---

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest event Reported): May 16, 2011 (May 16, 2011)

KRANEM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado	000-53563	02-0585306
(State or other jurisdiction of	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[     ]    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[     ]    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[     ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[     ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors described in the section captioned “Risk Factors” below. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

Also, forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference and filed as exhibits to this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

USE OF CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

Except where the context otherwise requires and for the purposes of this report only, references to:

• the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” are to the combined business of Kranem Corporation (d/b/a Learningwire), a Colorado corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, Xalted Networks and Xalted Information;

• “Xalted Holding” are to Xalted Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation;

• “Xalted” is the combination of Xalted Networks and Xalted Information.

• “Xalted Networks” are to Xalted Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

• “Xalted Information” are to Xalted Information Systems (Pvt.) Ltd., an Indian company;

• “India” are to the Republic of India;

• “SEC” are to the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• “Securities Act” are to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

• “Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

• “Rupees” and “Rs.” are to the legal currency of India; and

• “U.S. dollars,” “dollars” and “$” are to the legal currency of the United States.

MARKET DATA AND FORECAST

Unless otherwise indicated, information in this current report on Form 8-K concerning economic conditions and our industry is based on information from independent industry analysts and publications, as well as our estimates. Except where otherwise noted, our estimates are derived from publicly available information released by third-party sources, as well as data from our internal research, and are based on such data and knowledge of our industry, which we believe to be reasonable. None of the independent industry publications used in this report was prepared on our or our affiliates’ behalf. We have not independently verified the underlying information in such publications and reports and you should not unduly rely upon it.

1

---

ITEM 1.01	ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT

On May 13, 2011, we executed agreements to acquire three convertible promissory notes issued by Xalted Holding, or the Notes, in exchange for the issuance of 2,094,159 newly issued shares of our common stock, to Imprenord ME, the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $1,750,000; 598,331 newly issued shares of our common stock, to Empire Capital Partners, L.P., the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $500,000; and 299,166 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value [$0.0001], to Peter Richards, the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $250,000.

On May 12, 2011, we entered into an agreement, or the Share Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which we acquired the wholly-owned subsidiary of Xalted Holding, Xalted Networks, in exchange for the issuance to Xalted Holding of 2,326,844 newly issued shares of our common stock, and the cancellation of the Notes.

The shares issued Xalted Holding and to the holders of the Notes constituted 35% (Xalted Holding), 31.5% (Imprenord ME), 9% (Empire Capital Partners, L.P.) and 4.5% (Peter Richards), of our issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement.

The foregoing description of the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Assignment of Note Agreements is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement and Assignment of Note Agreements filed collectively as Exhibit 10.1 hereto.

ITEM 2.01

COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS

On May 13, 2011, we completed the acquisition of the Notes and of Xalted Networks described in Item 1.01 above.

FORM 10 DISCLOSURE

As disclosed elsewhere in this report, we acquired Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011. Item 2.01(f) of Form 8-K states that if the registrant was a shell company, as we were immediately before the acquisition transaction disclosed under Item 2.01, then the registrant must disclose the information that would be required if the registrant were filing a general form for registration of securities on Form 10.

Accordingly, we are providing below the information that would be included in a Form 10 if we were to file a Form 10. Please note that the information provided below relates to the combined enterprises after the acquisition of Xalted Networks, except that information relating to periods prior to the date of the acquisition only relate to Xalted Networks unless otherwise specifically indicated.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business Overview

Xalted provides advanced software solutions that enable companies and public organizations, including governments and law enforcement agencies, to capture, manage and analyze structured and unstructured data to enhance business and operational performance and address security threats. The two principal markets that our software solutions address are the telecom security market and the homeland security market. Xalted includes law enforcement as part of the homeland security market. Our current and past geographic focus is on India and the surrounding countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

In the telecom security market, we provide four software modules that address different aspects of the telecom security market: revenue maximization, revenue assurance, fraud management and OSS/BSS (short for operations support systems and business support systems). The revenue maximization module allows a telecom service provider to identify trends in the usage of various services provided, so that it can tailor its service offering to maximize revenue. Revenue assurance locates potential users that are trying to use portions of the telecom service provider’s system capabilities without being a valid user of those services. The software module identifies illegal users, allowing the telecom service provider to take appropriate measures, generally comprised of locking the user out of a specific service or service package within the service network. The fraud management system module, or FMS, identifies a larger scale attempted use of the telecom service provider’s network by an individual or individuals who are not valid network users. The operations support systems, or OSS, and business support systems, or BSS, are business management tools that allow a telecom service provider to develop and deploy a new service offering more rapidly. The module automatically accounts for potential equipment limitations in the roll-out of a new service offering. The term OSS is commonly used to describe network systems dealing with the telecom network itself, as well as supporting processes such as maintaining network inventory, provisioning services, configuring network components and managing faults.

2

---

Our telecom security customers include major telecom companies and organizations in India, such as Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., or BSNL, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, or MTNL, and the Centre for Development of Telematics, or CDOT, the telecom technology development center of the Government of India. BSNL is India’s oldest and largest communications service provider and one of its largest cellular service providers. It has footprints throughout India, except for the metropolitan cities of Mumbai and New Delhi, which are managed by MTNL. Telecom customers outside of India include Mozambique Cellular, or Mcel, Nepal Telecom, Nepal Satellite Telecom, Telecom Italia and Hutchison 3G.

In the homeland security market, our security solutions are used by governments and law enforcement agencies in their efforts to protect people and property and combat terrorism and crime. Our homeland security customers include the national Government of India and local and regional law enforcement agencies and bodies in India, such as the Anti-Terrorist Squads in Mumbai, Maharashtra and Goa, the STF or special task force in Uttarakand, and the Cyber Crime division of the Thane District Police.

Our corporate headquarters are located in Menlo Park, CA. We also have two operational centers in India. The telecom security operations group is located in Bangaluru, India. The homeland security operations are located in Mumbai, India. The Company’s sales offices are located in Delhi, India.

Our Corporate History and Background

Background and History of Kranem Corporation

We were incorporated in the State of Colorado on April 18, 2002 under the name Kranem Corporation. We previously offered high-quality office and office supply products to businesses, educational institutions, government agencies and individuals through our website, www.learningwire.com. We operated our business under our “Learningwire” trade name, which is registered with the Colorado Secretary of State. However, we ceased our online operations in January 2006 and from that time until the acquisition of Xalted Networks described below, we did not engage in any active operations, other than our search for a privately owned corporation to merge with or acquire. On May 13, 2011, we cancelled 2,185,000 shares of our common stock held by Stephen K. Smith, 185,000 shares of our common stock, held by Michael Grove, and 542,500 shares of our common stock held by Anne Brady.

Acquisition of Xalted Networks

On May 13, 2011, we executed agreements to acquire three convertible promissory notes issued by Xalted Holding, or the Notes, in exchange for the issuance of 2,094,159 newly issued shares of our common stock, to Imprenord ME, the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $1,750,000; 598,331 newly issued shares of our common stock, to Empire Capital Partners, L.P., the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $500,000; and 299,166 newly issued shares of our common stock, to Peter Richards, the holder of a Note in the principal amount of $250,000. On May 13, 2011, we acquired the wholly-owned subsidiary of Xalted Holding, Xalted Networks, in exchange for the issuance to Xalted Holding of 2,326,844 newly issued shares of our common stock, and the cancellation of the Notes. The shares issued Xalted Holding and to the holders of the Notes constituted 35% (Xalted Holding), 31.5% (Imprenord ME), 9% (Empire Capital Partners, L.P.) and 4.5% (Peter Richards), of our issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement.

As a result of our acquisition of Xalted Networks, we now own all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Xalted Networks. Xalted Networks is an investment holding company with no operations or liabilities, and together with its nominees is the 100% owner of Xalted Information. Xalted Information was established in India during 2003. Its principal activities include the development of security software for the telecom and homeland security markets, which includes the continuing support of the software. See "—Our Corporate Structure" below.

3

---

Upon the closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011, Michael Grove, our Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, submitted a resignation letter pursuant to which he resigned from all offices held by him, effective immediately; and Stephen K. Smith, our President and director, submitted a resignation letter pursuant to which he resigned from all offices that he held, effective immediately, and from his position as our director effective on the tenth day following our mailing of an information statement complying with the requirements of Section 14f-1 of the Exchange Act, or the Information Statement, to our stockholders, which will be mailed on or about May 20, 2011. On the same date, our board of directors increased its size from one to three members and appointed Mr. Ajay Batheja, Mr. Luigi Caramico and Mr. V.R. Ranganath, to fill the vacancies created by such increase and Mr. Smith’s resignation. Mr. Batheja’s appointment became effective upon the closing of the acquisition on May 13, 2011, and the remaining appointments will become effective upon the tenth day following our mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders. In addition, Mr. Batheja became our Chairman, Chief Executive Office and President effective as of the closing of the acquisition. Mr. Batheja was and remains the Chief Executive Officer of Xalted Information.

As a result of the acquisition, we have assumed the business and operations of Xalted Networks and Xalted Information and we plan to change our name to “Xalted” to more accurately reflect our new business operations.

Our Corporate Structure

All of our business operations are conducted through Xalted Information, which is wholly owned by Xalted Networks and its nominees. The chart below presents our current corporate structure.

Our Industry

Telecom Security Solutions Market and Trends

We believe that the key trends driving demand for our telecom security solutions are:

Increasing revenue generation. Increasing the company’s revenue stream is the single greatest challenge in the telecom industry today. The telecom industry can improve most of its operating metrics by simply increasing revenue while controlling costs. The fastest method to increasing revenue is through its service and package offering to its users. The best possible revenue solution for the industry is to revise its service offering in such a manner, so that it requires minimal changes in the network but provides increased revenue generation. Inherently implied in this trend is that the existing revenue cannot be compromised, which is to say eliminate the potential for fraudulent use of the service providers network. To address this trend, Xalted has developed the two modules revenue maximization and revenue assurance.

4

---

Increased focus on productivity, operational performance and profitability. In today’s economy, companies are increasingly focused on improving productivity and increasing profitability by creating better-quality customer experiences and through achieving higher efficiencies across the enterprise. These objectives require organizations to better manage their customer, partner and employee relationships, analyze critical customer data, maximize the value of customer interactions and execute customer-focused business processes. Considering the high cost of acquiring new customers and the maturation of many industries, it is increasingly important to maximize revenue from the retention and continued satisfaction of current customers. Similarly, due to the high cost of upgrading the telecom network with new equipment and technologies is very expensive. Accordingly, the telecom industry would prefer to minimize capital costs while improving the overall performance of its network. The solution is have a system that can integrate new technologies and capabilities on top of the existing equipment and network capabilities or at a minimum replace the least amount of equipment possible for a new capability. To address the industry’s needs Xalted has developed its OSS/BSS software module. Within the OSS portion of the module exists tools that will allow the user to assess the networks capabilities in modifying legacy systems and equipment.

Heightened regulatory and compliance requirements and the need for dispute resolution. Compliance and regulatory pressures have increased for corporations and public organizations worldwide. These include both internal and external regulations, such as compliance and regulations that may be driven by accounting scandals (e.g., the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), security concerns (e.g., anti-money laundering legislation) and recent events in the financial industry (e.g., the increase in fraud attempts related to wire transfers). In addition, it is important to be able to eliminate and/or resolve communication disputes, such as between counterparties in a securities trade, in an efficient and definitive manner. Existing business intelligence and other IT solutions have addressed these growing challenges to some degree. However, institutions require improved solutions that not only provide better compliance and surveillance, but also more current, real-time information with increased operational visibility. Advanced FMS and OSS/BSS enable the reduction of the costs associated with ongoing compliance, improved customer service, while creating the required audit trail for regulatory purposes.

Homeland Security Solutions Market and Trends

We believe that terrorism and organized crime, which includes drug trafficking, and other security threats, combined with an expanding range of communication and information media, are driving demand for innovative security solutions that collect, integrate, and analyze information from voice, video, and data communications, as well as from other sources, such as private and public databases. We believe that the key trends driving demand for our homeland security solutions are:

Increasing complexity of communications networks and growing network traffic. Law enforcement and certain other government agencies are typically given the authority to intercept communication transmissions to and from specified targets for the purpose of generating evidence. National security and intelligence agencies intercept communications, often in massive volumes, for the purpose of generating intelligence and supporting investigations. We believe that these agencies are seeking technically advanced solutions to help them to keep pace with increasingly complex communications networks and the growing amount of network traffic.

Improved ease of use, processing capabilities and reduced size of handheld communication devices. The advent of advanced handheld technology devices such as the iPhone and Blackberry have increased the communication capabilities of both terrorists and organized crime organizations. These new devices can send and receive telephone calls, text messages, emails, data files, pictures, and videos. These devices can browse the Internet, store data and provide GPS information. These handheld devices have only increased the complexities for the law enforcement community, intelligence and national security agencies. These organizations are looking for solutions to be able to track terrorists/criminals and their communication devices. Counter terrorist agencies and law enforcement organizations are looking for solutions that allow them to monitor multiple communication mediums, store and process the complexity of information that has been obtained into a useable source of information for fact based decision making.

Growing demand for advanced intelligence and investigative solutions. Investigations related to criminal and terrorist networks, drugs, financial crimes, and other illegal activities are highly complex and often involve collecting and analyzing information from multiple sources. We believe that law enforcement, national security, intelligence, and other government agencies are seeking advanced solutions that enable them to integrate and analyze information from multiple sources and collaborate more efficiently with various other agencies in order to unearth suspicious activity, optimize investigative workflows, and make investigations more effective.

5

---

Emerging needs for holistic situational awareness and event management. The number and variety of physical security sensors is growing substantially, with public and private organizations deploying security systems, such as surveillance cameras and access control and intrusion detection sensors. Organizations, municipalities and governmental entities are struggling to eliminate the number of information silos created by deployment of redundant security systems. These silos limit the control room operators’ ability to gain a cohesive and unified picture of situations. The lack of unified solutions undermines the ability to take decisive actions; furthermore, the lack of adequate tools for sharing information in real time between the various field security personnel, emergency forces and law enforcement agencies, among others, can substantially prolong response time and reduce the probability of successful event mitigation.

Increased urbanization raises rates of crime and risks of terror attacks. Increased urbanization in both developed and developing countries results in higher rates of various types of crime (such as robbery, theft, murder and other assaults) and greater fears of terror attacks in city centers and other metropolitan areas and systems (such as mass transit). These growing concerns are driving large-scale security projects in these areas, aiming at improving the security of the citizens. These large-scale projects include installation and implementation of wide-scale security systems, which better synchronize and correlate multimedia data sources in order to assist law enforcement officials to detect and prevent crimes and terror attacks and investigate quickly in order to apprehend the suspects.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that the following competitive strengths enable us to compete effectively and to capitalize on the growth of the telecom and homeland information security industries:

• We have established business relationships. We have established relationships with national and local governments and law enforcement agencies, as well as major telecom companies. We have been working with the Government of India since 2006 to create homeland security solutions. As a result this collaboration, our InteliANALYZER solution was deployed in four metro areas in India. We also have established relationships with local and regional law enforcement agencies and bodies in India, such as the Anti-Terrorist Squads in Mumbai, Maharashtra and Goa, a special law enforcement task force in Uttarakand, and the Cyber Crime Division of Thane District Police. We have been able to build upon our established relationships in both the government and telecom sectors by obtaining introductions to potentially new customers/users of our products. In the government sector, as we roll-out our products to the state and local law enforcement agencies; we are opening new opportunities for additional product sales. In the telecom security sector, we have been providing OSS/BSS services to MTNL since 2004 and to BSNL since 2005. Other customers include Mcel, Nepal Telecom, Nepal Satellite Telecom, Telecom Italia and Hutchison 3G.

• We have developed highly scalable advanced solutions. We believe that the data capture, retention, and retrieval system that we have developed is one of the fastest, most secure, and scalable systems in the world. This system was initially developed to track the demanding requirements of wireless telecom operators, including Telecom Italia, Fastweb and Albacom (British telecom) for their billing systems. Because it was built with linear scalability in mind, with high retrieval rates, it turned out to be the perfect platform to supply the increasingly complex needs of Government clients, whose data needs are demanding.

• We have a broad portfolio of information security solutions. We have worked closely with our customers over the past three years and developed twenty-eight proprietary, configurable modules that deliver “out of the box” value for customers. Our solutions can be deployed stand-alone or collectively as part of a large-scale system to address the needs of our clients that require advanced, comprehensive solutions. Our homeland security solutions are designed to handle massive amounts of unstructured and structured information from different sources (including fixed and mobile networks, IP networks, and the Internet), can quickly make sense of complex scenarios and generate evidence and intelligence. These highly specialized, unique, domain expertise-filled modules have helped our clients foil or mitigate over ten terrorist plans in last two years.

Our Growth Strategy

We are committed to enhancing profitability and cash flows through the following strategies:

• We plan to continue our penetration of the homeland information security market in India. We believe that our current penetration of the homeland information security market in India is less than 1% of its total market opportunity. Given our established business relationships, advanced product offerings and proven track record, we expect sustained growth in this market. We are currently negotiating an incremental $30 million agreement with the Government that we expect to close in the second half of 2011.

6

---

• We plan to continue to expand our market presence outside of India. We intend to continue expanding our existing relationships outside of India while creating new ones. We are currently in discussions with key agencies and governments in Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Oman to expand our homeland security business. We also plan to leverage our current relationships in other areas such as Italy and the Middle East to develop significant customer relationships over time.

• We plan to augment our organic grown with strategic acquisitions. We examine acquisition opportunities regularly as a means to add technology, increase our geographic presence or expand into adjacent markets. We hope to complete one such acquisition in the second half of 2011. Among our potential acquisition targets are a company with a complementary code base, which we believe will immediately add functionality to our platform and provide us with new customers and new channel partners. We are also looking at three other potential acquisition candidates that could provide the Company with both new products as well as new customers. All these potential acquisition targets are in the early stages of discussions.

Our Products

Telecom Information Security Solutions

We provide integrated, end to end, flexible and multi-purpose OSS/BSS solutions to telecom companies, which accelerate the order to bill cycle, reduce integration costs and minimize error rates. Our solutions automate all processes from order to cash for any service, on any technology. They are designed to support multiple services and technologies, both existing and evolving, and also support new content-based service components.

Following is a summary of our telecom security solutions:

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately 69.9% and 53.7%, respectively, of our revenues were generated from sales of our telecom security solutions.

7

---

Homeland Information Security Solutions

In the homeland security sector, we have developed our Actionable Intelligence System, or InteliCENTER. InteliCENTER is a sophisticated data analytics and monitoring platform for intelligence agencies that acquires, correlates and analyzes large volumes of structured and unstructured data received from varied information sources (such as telecommunications service providers, internet service providers, government agencies and other information systems) and provides actionable intelligence to proactively counter criminal activities. Unstructured data includes cross-channel analysis of phone calls, internet sessions, email, chat, instant messaging, video captured by closed circuit cameras and radio communications.

InteliCENTER empowers intelligence agencies with strategic, operational and tactical information to bring out unforeseen intelligence, which can lead to proactive measures to thwart any criminal activity endangering public safety. It helps intelligence agencies to gain insight into data by analyzing the data patterns, uncovering the links within the data, discern relationships, monitor target movements, etc. InteliCENTER can be customized to a significant extent to cater to the requirements of clients.

InteliCENTER was the Company’s first product to address the homeland security market needs. Since the development of InteliCENTER, we have developed three additional modules based upon the request of our customers.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately 30.1% and 46.3%, respectively, of our revenues were generated from sales of our homeland security solutions.

8

---

Customer Service and Support

We offer a range of customer services, including implementation, training, consulting and maintenance to help our customers maximize their return on investment in our solutions. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fees that the Company received were less than 1% of total revenues. While we did double our customer service and support fees from 2009 to 2010; the fees are well below that of our competition and an area that we would like to significantly improve the revenue generation going forward.

Our solutions are implemented and installed by our service organizations Our implementation services include project management, system installation, and commissioning, including integrating our applications with our customers’ environments and third-party solutions. Our training programs are designed to enable our customers to effectively utilize our solutions and to certify our partners to sell, install, and support our solutions. Customer and partner training are provided at the customer site, at our training centers, or remotely through webinars. Our consulting services are designed to enable our customers to maximize the value of our solutions in their own environments.

We offer a range of customer maintenance support programs to our customers and resellers, including phone, Web, and email access to technical personnel up to 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Our support programs are designed to ensure long-term, successful use of our solutions. We believe that customer support is critical to retaining and expanding our customer base. Our solutions are sold with a warranty of generally one year for hardware and 90 days for software. In addition, customers are typically provided the option to purchase maintenance plans that provide a range of services, such as telephone support, advanced replacement, upgrades when and if available, and on-site repair or replacement.

Our Customers

We sell our products domestically and internationally. Historically, a small number of customers have accounted for a substantial portion of our revenue. Due to nondisclosure agreements with certain key customers, we cannot disclose the exact percentages that their sales would impact the Company As we target new markets, we expect that our customer composition as well as the identity and concentration of our top customers will change from period to period.

In the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 67.7% and 75.2% of our revenue, respectively, from domestic customers, and approximately 32.3% and 24.8% of our revenue, respectively, from international customers.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 30% of our business was generated from contracts with various governments, including federal, state, and local government agencies. Some of the customer engagements on which we work require us to have the necessary security credentials or to participate in the project through an approved legal entity. In addition, because of the unique nature of the terms and conditions associated with government contracts generally, our government contracts may be subject to renegotiation or termination at the election of the government customer. For a more detailed discussion of the risks associated with our government customers, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We are dependent on contracts with governments for a significant portion of our revenue and these contracts also expose us to additional business risks and compliance obligations” and “—Indian and foreign governments could refuse to buy our homeland security solutions or could deactivate our security clearances in their countries thereby restricting or eliminating our ability to sell these solutions in those countries and perhaps influence other countries by such a decision.”

Sales and Marketing

We sell our software and services primarily through our direct sales teams and a small portion through our indirect channel, consisting mostly of resellers.

Each of our solutions is sold by trained, dedicated, regionally organized direct and indirect sales teams. Our direct sales teams are focused on large and mid-sized customers and, in many cases, co-sell with our sales agents. Our indirect sales teams are focused on developing and supporting relationships with our indirect channels, which provide us with broader market coverage, including access to their customer base, integration services, and presence in certain geographies and vertical markets. Our sales teams are supported by our internal implementation and installation specialists, who, during the sales process, determine customer requirements and develop technical responses to those requirements. While we sell directly and indirectly in both of our segments, sales of our telecom security solutions are primarily direct, and sales of our homeland security solutions is exclusively direct.

9

---

Research and Development

We continue to enhance the features and performance of our existing software solutions and to introduce new solutions through extensive software development activities, including the development of new software modules and features, as well as enhancements and customer requests to the Company’s existing software offering. We also offer consulting services, which allows us to evaluate and determine our customers’ needs and customize our software to meet those needs. In some instances, our customers will identify particular requirements that they have and we will customize our products to meet the particular requirements of our customers. We believe that our future success depends on a number of factors, which include our ability to:

• identify and respond to emerging technological trends in our target markets;

• develop and maintain competitive solutions that meet our customers’ changing needs and requirements;

• enhance our existing products by adding features and functionality to meet specific customer needs or differentiate our products from those of our competitors;

• constantly evaluate external opportunities to accelerate our product offering through key acquisitions of businesses, business units and technology licenses; and

• attract, recruit, and retain highly skilled and experienced employees.

To support these efforts, we make significant investments in research and development every year. In the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we spent approximately 25% of the cost of revenues on research and development. We allocate our research and development resources in response to market research and customer demand for additional features and solutions. Our development strategy involves rolling out initial releases of our products and adding features over time. We incorporate product feedback received from our customers into our product development process. While the majority of our products are developed internally, in some cases, we also acquire or license technologies, products, and applications from third parties based on timing and cost considerations.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and protect our proprietary technology and to conduct our business without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We rely primarily on a combination of proprietary technology and trade secrets, as well as employee and third-party confidentiality agreements, to safeguard our intellectual property.

We license certain software, technology, and related rights for use in the marketing of our software. We believe that our rights under such licenses and other agreements are sufficient for the marketing of our products and, in the case of licenses, extend for periods at least equal to the estimated useful lives of the related technology and know-how.

Our licenses are designed to prohibit unauthorized use, copying, and disclosure of our software technology. When we license our software to customers, we require license agreements containing restrictions and confidentiality terms customary in the industry in order to protect our proprietary rights in the software. These agreements generally warrant that the software and propriety hardware will materially comply with written documentation and assert that we own or have sufficient rights in the software we distribute and have not violated the intellectual property rights of others. We license our products in a format that does not permit users to change the software code.

We protect our trade secrets through confidentiality provisions of the employment contracts we enter into with our employees. In addition, our software engineers and programmers are generally divided into different project groups, each of which generally handles only a portion of the project software. As a result, no one software engineer or programmer generally has access to the entire design process and documentation for a particular product.

We cannot give any assurance that the protection afforded for our intellectual property will be adequate. It may be possible for third parties to obtain and use, without our consent, intellectual property that we own or are licensed to use. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property by third parties, and the expenses incurred in protecting our intellectual property rights, may adversely affect our business. We may also be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement or violation of other intellectual property rights of third parties. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our intellectual property may not be adequately protected,” “—Our products may infringe or may be alleged to infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, which could lead to costly disputes or disruptions for us and may require us to indemnify our customers and resellers for any damages they suffer” and —Reliance on or loss of third-party licensing agreements could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.”

10

---

Our Competition

We face strong competition in all of our markets, and we expect that competition will persist and intensify. Our primary competitors are i2 Limited (U.K.), Narus, Inc., Verint Systems Inc., NICE Systems Ltd. (Israel), Septier Communication Ltd. (Israel), SS8 Networks, Inc., Visual Analytics Inc., and many smaller companies, which can vary across regions. Some of our competitors have superior brand recognition and greater financial resources than we do, which may enable them to increase their market share at our expense. Furthermore, we expect that competition will increase as other established and emerging companies enter markets and as new products, services, and technologies are introduced.

We believe that we compete principally on the basis of:

• product performance and functionality;

• product quality and reliability;

• breadth of product portfolio and interoperability;

• high-quality customer service and support;

• specific industry knowledge, vision, and experience; and

• price.

We believe that our success depends primarily on our ability to provide technologically advanced and cost-effective solutions and services. We expect that competition will increase as other established and emerging companies enter our market and as new products, services, and technologies are introduced. In recent years, there has also been significant consolidation among our competitors, which has improved the competitive position of several of these companies and enabled new competitors to emerge in all of our markets. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Intense competition in our markets and competitors with greater resources than us may limit our market share, profitability, and growth” for a more detailed discussion of the competitive risks we face.

Employees

As of December 31, 2010, we employed 151 full-time employees. The following table sets forth the number of our full-time employees by function.

Function	Number of Employees
Senior Management	5
Research and Development	116
Sales and Marketing	9
Human Resource & Administration	19
Accounting	3
TOTAL	151

We maintain a satisfactory working relationship with our employees, and we have not experienced any significant labor disputes or any difficulty in recruiting staff for our operations. None of our employees is represented by a labor union.

Regulation

Because most of our operations are in India, we are subject to national and local laws in India. This section summarizes the major regulations relating to our business.

Employment, Health and Safety Laws

We are subject to various labor, health and safety laws which govern the terms of employment of the our employees, their working conditions, the benefits available to them and the general relationship between our management and such employees. These include:

11

---

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“IDA”)

The IDA seeks to preempt industrial tensions in an establishment and provide the mechanics of dispute resolution, collective bargaining and the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes between unions and companies. While the IDA provides for the voluntary reference of disputes to arbitration, it also empowers the appropriate government agency to refer disputes for compulsory adjudication and prohibit strikes and lock-outs during the pendency of conciliation proceedings before a board of conciliation or adjudication proceedings before a labor court.

Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (“CLRA”)

The CLRA was enacted to regulate the employment of contract labor. The CLRA applies to every establishment in which 20 or more persons are employed or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months as contract labor. The CLRA vests the responsibility on the principal employer of an establishment to register as an establishment that engages contract labor. Likewise, every contractor to whom the CLRA applies must obtain a license and may not undertake or execute any work through contract laborers except in accordance with the license issued.

To ensure the welfare and health of contract labor, the CLRA imposes certain obligations on the contractor in relation to establishment of canteens, rest rooms, drinking water, washing facilities, first aid and other facilities and payment of wages. However, in the event the contractor fails to provide these amenities, the principal employer is under an obligation to provide these facilities within a prescribed time period.

Employee State Insurance Act, 1948 (“ESIA”)

The ESIA requires the provision of certain benefits to employees or their beneficiaries in the event of sickness, maternity, disability or employment injury. Every factory or establishment to which the ESIA applies is required to be registered in the manner prescribed under the ESIA. Every employee, including casual and temporary employees, whether employed directly or through a contractor, who is in receipt of wages up to Rs. 6,500 per month, is entitled to be insured under the ESIA. The ESIA contemplates the payment of a contribution by the principal employer and each employee to the Employee State Insurance Corporation.

Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (“PWA”)

The PWA regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of employed persons and makes every employer responsible for the payment of wages to persons employed by such employer. No deductions are permitted from, nor is any fine permitted to be levied on, wages earned by a person employed except as provided under the PWA.

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (“MWA”)

The MWA provides for a minimum wage payable by employers to employees. Under the MWA, every employer is required to pay the minimum wage to all employees, whether for skilled, unskilled, manual or clerical work, in accordance with the minimum rates of wages that have been fixed and revised under the MWA. Workers are to be paid for overtime at overtime rates stipulated by the appropriate government. Contravention of the provisions of this legislation may result in imprisonment up to six months, a fine up to Rs. 500 or both.

Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (“WCA”)

The WCA makes every employer liable to pay compensation if injury, disability or death is caused to a workman (including those employed through a contractor) due to an accident arising out of or in the course of his employment. If the employer fails to pay the compensation due under the WCA within one month from the date it falls due, the commissioner may direct the employer to pay the compensation amount along with interest and impose a penalty for non-payment.

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (“PGA”)

Under the PGA, an employee who has been in continuous service for a period of five years is eligible for gratuity upon retirement or resignation. The entitlement to gratuity in the event of superannuation or death or disablement due to accident or disease, will not be contingent on an employee having completed five years of continuous service. The maximum amount of gratuity payable must not exceed Rs. 350,000.

12

---

An employee is said to be in “continuous service” for a certain period notwithstanding that his service has been interrupted during that period by sickness, accident, leave, absence without leave, lay-off, strike, lock-out or cessation of work not due to the fault to of the employee. The employee is also deemed to be in continuous service if the employee has worked (in an establishment that works for at least six days in a week) for at least 240 days in a period of 12 months or 120 days in a period of six months immediately preceding the date of reckoning.

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (“PBA”)

The PBA provides for the payment of a minimum annual bonus to all employees regardless of whether the employer has made a profit or a loss in the accounting year in which the bonus is payable. Under the PBA, every employer is bound to pay to every employee, in respect of the relevant accounting year, a minimum bonus equal to 8.33% of the salary or wage earned by the employee during the accounting year or Rs. 100, whichever is higher. If the allocable surplus, as defined in the PBA, available to an employer in any accounting year exceeds the aggregate amount of minimum bonus payable to the employees, the employer is bound to pay bonuses at a higher rate which is in proportion to the salary or wage earned by the employee and the allocable surplus during the accounting year, subject to a maximum of 20% of such salary or wage. Contravention of the provisions of the PBA by a company will be punishable by imprisonment for up to six months or a fine of up to Rs. 1,000, or both, against persons in charge of, and responsible to the company for, the conduct of the business of the company at the time of contravention.

Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPFA”)

The EPFA creates provident funds for the benefit of employees in factories and other establishments. Contributions are required to be made by employers and employees to a provident fund and pension fund established and maintained by the Government of India. The employer is responsible for deducting employees’ contributions from the wages of employees and remitting the employees’ as well as its own contributions to the relevant fund. The EPFA empowers the Government of India to frame various funds such as the “Employees Provident Fund Scheme,” the “Employees Deposit-linked Insurance Scheme” and the “Employees Family Pension Scheme.”

Other Regulations

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (“Land Acquisition Act”)

As per the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, the central government or appropriate state government is empowered to acquire any land from private persons for ‘public purpose’ subject to payment of compensation to the persons from whom the land is so acquired. The Land Acquisition Act further prescribes the manner in which such acquisition may be made by the central government or the appropriate state government. Additionally, any person having an interest in such land has the right to object to such proposed acquisition.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this report, before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You should read the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” above for a discussion of what types of statements are forward-looking statements, as well as the significance of such statements in the context of this report.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

Our business is impacted by changes in general economic conditions and information technology spending in particular.

Our business is subject to risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global economic conditions. Slowdowns or recessions around the world may cause companies and governments to delay, reduce, or even cancel planned spending. Customers or partners who are facing business challenges or liquidity issues are also more likely to delay purchase decisions or cancel orders, as well as to delay or default on payments. If customers or partners significantly reduce their spending with us or significantly delay or fail to make payments to us, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. Moreover, as a result of recent economic conditions, like many companies, we engaged in significant cost-saving measures over the last two years. We cannot assure you that these measures will not negatively impact our ability to execute on our objectives and grow in the future, particularly if we are not able to invest in our business as a result of a protracted economic downturn.

13

---

If the pace of spending by the governments and security organizations is slower than anticipated, our homeland security business will likely be adversely affected.

The market for our homeland security solutions is highly dependent on the spending cycle and spending scope of the Government of India, as well as local, state and municipal governments and security organizations in international markets. We cannot be sure that the spending cycle will materialize as we expect and that we will be positioned to benefit from the potential opportunities, especially in light of the current unfavorable economic and market conditions.

Intense competition in our markets and competitors with greater resources than us may limit our market share, profitability, and growth.

We face aggressive competition from numerous and varied competitors in all of our markets, making it difficult to maintain market share, remain profitable, and grow. Even if we are able to maintain or increase our market share for a particular product, revenue or profitability could decline due to pricing pressures, increased competition from other types of products, or because the product is in a maturing industry.

Our competitors may be able to more quickly develop or adapt to new or emerging technologies, better respond to changes in customer requirements or preferences, or devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of their products. Some of our competitors have, in relation to us, longer operating histories, larger customer bases, longer standing relationships with customers, greater name recognition, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, customer service, public relations, distribution, or other resources. Some of our competitors are also significantly larger than us and some of these companies have increased their presence in our markets in recent years through internal development, partnerships, and acquisitions. There has also been significant consolidation among our competitors, which has improved the competitive position of several of these companies and enabled new competitors to emerge in all of our markets. In addition, we may face competition from solutions developed internally by our customers or partners. To the extent we cannot compete effectively, our market share and, therefore, results of operations, could be materially adversely affected. Because price and related terms are key considerations for many of our customers, we may have to accept less-favorable payment terms, lower the prices of our products and services, and/or reduce our cost structure, including reducing headcount or investment in research and development, in order to remain competitive. Certain of our competitors have become increasingly aggressive in their pricing strategy, particularly in markets where they are trying to establish a foothold. If we are forced to take these kinds of actions to maintain market share, our revenue and profitability may suffer or we may adversely impact our longer-term ability to execute or compete.

In order to grow at the pace expected by management, we will require additional capital to support our long-term business plan. If we are unable to obtain additional capital in future years, we may be unable to proceed with our long-term business plan, and we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations.

We will require additional working capital to support our long-term business plan, which includes identifying suitable targets for horizontal or vertical mergers or acquisitions, so as to enhance the overall productivity and benefit from economies of scale. Our working capital requirements and the cash flow provided by future operating activities, if any, will vary greatly from quarter to quarter, depending on the volume of business during the period and payment terms with our customers. We may not be able to obtain adequate levels of additional financing, whether through equity financing, debt financing or other sources. Additional financings could result in significant dilution to our earnings per share or the issuance of securities with rights superior to our current outstanding securities. In addition, we may grant registration rights to investors purchasing our equity or debt securities in the future. If we are unable to raise additional financing, we may be unable to implement our long-term business plan, develop or enhance our products and services, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures on a timely basis, if at all. In addition, a lack of additional financing could force us to substantially curtail or cease operations.

Our liquidity may be materially adversely affected by continuing constraints in the capital markets.

We must have sufficient sources of liquidity to fund our working capital requirements, service our outstanding indebtedness and finance investment opportunities. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be forced to curtail our operations or we may not be able to pursue promising business opportunities. The principal sources of our liquidity are funds generated from operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings under credit facilities and other debt financings. For the past several quarters, global financial markets have experienced diminished liquidity, constrained credit availability and volatility in securities prices. If our sources of liquidity do not satisfy our requirements, we may have to seek additional financing. The future availability of financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as economic and market conditions, the availability of credit and our credit ratings, as well as the possibility that lenders could develop a negative perception of us or the retail industry generally. If required, we may not be able to obtain additional financing, on favorable terms, or at all.

14

---

Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of the risks associated with acquisitions and investments. In particular, we may not succeed in making additional acquisitions or be effective in integrating such acquisitions.

As part of our growth strategy, we have made and expect to continue to make acquisitions. We frequently evaluate the tactical or strategic opportunities available related to complementary businesses, products or technologies. The process of integrating an acquired company’s business into our operations and/or of investing in new technologies, may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and large expenditures and may absorb significant management attention that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business, and which may result in the loss of key customers and/or personnel and expose us to unanticipated liabilities.

Other risks commonly encountered with acquisitions include the effect of the acquisition on our financial and strategic position and reputation, the failure of the acquired business to further our strategies, the inability to successfully integrate or commercialize acquired technologies and achieve expected synergies or economies of scale on a timely basis, and the potential impairment of acquired assets. Further, we may not be able to retain the key employees that may be necessary to operate the business we acquire, and, we may not be able to timely attract new skilled employees and management to replace them. From time to time, we may also need to acquire complementary technologies, whether to execute our strategies or in order to comply with customer needs. There are no assurances that we will be able to acquire or successfully integrate an acquired company, business or technology, or successfully leverage such complementary technology in the market.

Moreover, there can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition or investment will be realized. Future acquisitions or investments could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, and amortization expenses related to intangible assets, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in making additional acquisitions or effective in integrating such acquisitions into our existing business. We may also compete with others to acquire companies, and such competition may result in decreased availability of, or increased prices for, suitable acquisition candidates. In addition, for possible commercial and economic considerations, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions that we have identified as crucial to the implementation of our strategy. We may not be able to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, including those of competition authorities and foreign investment authorities, in countries where we seek to consummate acquisitions. For those and other reasons, we may ultimately fail to consummate an acquisition, even if we announce that we plan to acquire a company.

The industry in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological changes and evolving industry standards, and if we cannot anticipate and react to such changes our results may suffer.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technology and the emergence of new industry standards can exert pricing pressure on existing products and/or can render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. It is critical to our success that, in all of our markets, we are able to:

• anticipate and respond to changes in technology and industry standards;

• successfully develop and introduce new, enhanced, and competitive products which meet our customers’ changing needs; and

• deliver these new and enhanced products on a timely basis while adhering to our high quality standards.

We may not be able to successfully develop new products or introduce new applications for existing products. In addition, new products and applications that we introduce may not achieve market acceptance. If we are unable to introduce new products that address the needs of our customers or that achieve market acceptance, there may be a material adverse impact on our revenue and on our financial results.

15

---

Because many of our solutions are sophisticated, we must invest greater resources in sales and installation processes with greater risk of loss if we are not successful.

In many cases, it is necessary for us to educate our potential customers about the benefits and value of our solutions because many of our solutions are not simple, mass-market items with which customers are already familiar. In addition, many of our solutions are sophisticated and may not be readily usable by customers without our assistance in training, system integration, and configuration. The greater need to work with and educate customers as part of the sales process and, after completion of a sale, during the installation process for many of our products, increases the time and difficulty of completing transactions, makes it more difficult to efficiently deploy limited resources, and creates risk that we will have invested in an opportunity that ultimately does not come to fruition. If we are unable to demonstrate the benefits and value of our solutions to customers and efficiently convert our sales leads into successful sales and installations, our results may be adversely affected.

Many of our sales are made by competitive bid, which often requires us to expend significant resources, which we may not recoup.

Many of our sales, particularly in larger installations, are made by competitive bid. Successfully competing in competitive bidding situations subjects us to risks associated with the frequent need to bid on programs in advance of the completion of their design, which may result in unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns, as well as making substantial investments of time and money in research and development and marketing activities for contracts that may not be awarded to us. If we do not ultimately win a bid, we may obtain little or no benefit from these expenditures and may not be able to recoup these costs on future projects.

Even where we are not involved in a competitive bidding process, due to the intense competition in our markets and increasing customer demand for shorter delivery periods, we must in some cases begin the implementation of a project before the corresponding order has been finalized, increasing the risk that we will have to write off expenses associated with potential orders that do not come to fruition.

The nature of our business and our varying business models may impact and make it difficult for us to predict our operating results.

It is difficult for us to forecast the timing of revenue from product sales because customers often need a significant amount of time to evaluate our products before a purchase, and sales are dependent on budgetary and, in the case of government customers, other bureaucratic processes. The period between initial customer contact and a purchase by a customer may vary from as little as a few weeks to more than a year. During the evaluation period, customers may defer or scale down proposed orders for various reasons, including:

• changes in budgets and purchasing priorities;

• reductions in need to upgrade existing systems;

• deferrals in anticipation of enhanced or new products;

• introduction of new products by our competitors; or

• lower prices offered by our competitors.

In addition, we have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from contracts for large system installations with major customers and we continue to emphasize sales to larger customers in our product development and marketing strategies. Contracts for large installations typically involve a lengthy and complex bidding and selection process, and our ability to obtain particular contracts is inherently difficult to predict. The timing and scope of these opportunities are difficult to forecast, and the pricing and margins may vary substantially from transaction to transaction. As a result, our future operating results may be volatile and vary significantly from period to period.

While we have no single customer that is material to our total revenue, we do have many significant customers. The deferral or loss of one or more significant orders or customers or a delay in an expected implementation of such an order could materially adversely affect our segment operating results.

Under applicable accounting standards and guidance, revenue for some of our software and hardware transactions is recognized at the time of delivery, while revenue from other software and hardware transactions is required to be deferred over a period of years. To a large extent, this depends on the terms we offer to customers and resellers, including terms relating to pricing, future deliverables, and post-contract customer support . As a result, it is difficult for us to accurately predict at the outset of a given period how much of our future revenue will be recognized within that period and how much will be required to be deferred over a longer period.

16

---

We base our current and future expense levels on our internal operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating costs are, to a large extent, fixed. As a result, we may not be able to sufficiently reduce our operating costs in any period to compensate for an unexpected near-term shortfall in revenue.

Due to our rapid growth in recent years, our past results may not be indicative of our future performance so evaluating our business and prospects may be difficult.

Our business has grown and evolved rapidly in the past two years as demonstrated by our growth in sales revenue from approximately $5.3 million in 2009 to $7.9 million in 2010. We may not be able to achieve similar growth in future periods, and our historical operating results may not provide a meaningful basis for evaluating our business, financial performance and prospects. Therefore, you should not rely on our past results or our historical rate of growth as an indication of our future performance.

Our products may contain undetected defects which could impair their market acceptance and may result in customer claims for substantial damages if our products fail to perform properly.

Our products are complex and involve sophisticated technology that performs critical functions to highly demanding standards. Our existing and future products may develop operational problems. In addition, new products or new versions of existing products may contain undetected defects or errors. If we do not discover such defects, errors, or other operational problems until after a product has been released and used by the customer or partner, we may incur significant costs to correct such defects, errors, or other operational problems, including product liability claims or other contract liabilities to customers or partners. In addition, defects or errors in our products may result in claims for substantial damages and questions regarding the integrity of the products, which could cause adverse publicity and impair their market acceptance.

If the regulatory environment does not evolve as expected or does not favor our products, our results may suffer.

The regulatory environment relating to our solutions is still evolving and, in the homeland security market in particular, has been driven to a significant extent by legislative and regulatory actions, such as standards established by ETSI in Europe, as well as initiatives to strengthen security for critical infrastructure, such as airports. These actions and initiatives are evolving and are at all times subject to change based on factors beyond our control, such as political climate, budgets, and even current events. While we attempt to anticipate these actions and initiatives through our product offerings and refinements thereto, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in these efforts, that our competitors will not do so more successfully than us, or that changes in these actions or initiatives or the underlying factors which affect them will not occur which will reduce or eliminate this demand. If any of the foregoing should occur, or if our markets do not grow as anticipated for any other reason, our results may suffer. In addition, changes to these actions or initiatives, including changes to technical requirements, may require us to modify or redesign our products in order to maintain compliance, which may subject us to significant additional expense.

Conversely, as the telecommunications industry continues to evolve, state, federal, and foreign governments (including supranational government organizations such as the European Union) and industry associations may increasingly regulate the monitoring of telecommunications and telephone or internet monitoring and recording products such as ours. We believe that increases in regulation could come in a number of forms, including increased regulations regarding privacy or protection of personal information such as social security numbers, credit card information, and employment records. The adoption of these types of regulations or changes to existing regulations could cause a decline in the use of our solutions or could result in increased expense for us if we must modify our solutions to comply with these regulations. Moreover, these types of regulations could subject our customers or us to liability. Whether or not these kinds of regulations are adopted, if we do not adequately address the privacy concerns of consumers, companies may be hesitant to use our solutions. If any of these events occur, our business could be materially adversely affected.

17

---

Because we have significant foreign operations, we are subject to geopolitical and other risks that could materially adversely affect our business.

We have significant operations in foreign countries. The countries in which we have our most significant foreign operations include India, Nepal and Mozambique, and we intend to continue to expand our operations internationally. We believe our business may suffer if we are unable to successfully expand into new regions, as well as maintain and expand existing foreign operations. Our foreign operations are, and any future foreign expansion will be, subject to a variety of risks, many of which are beyond our control, including risks associated with:

• foreign currency fluctuations;

• political, security, and economic instability in foreign countries;

• changes in and compliance with local laws and regulations, including export control laws, tax laws, labor laws, employee benefits, customs requirements, currency restrictions, and other requirements;

• differences in tax regimes and potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in foreign countries;

• customizing products for foreign countries;

• legal uncertainties regarding liability and intellectual property rights;

• hiring and retaining qualified foreign employees; and

• difficulty in accounts receivable collection and extended collection periods.

Any or all of these factors could materially affect our business or results of operations.

We are dependent on contracts with governments for a significant portion of our revenue and these contracts also expose us to additional business risks and compliance obligations.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 30.4% of our business was generated from contracts with various governments, including federal, state, and local government agencies. We expect that government contracts will continue to be a significant source of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Our business generated from government contracts may be materially adversely affected if:

• our reputation or relationship with government agencies is impaired;

• we are suspended or otherwise prohibited from contracting with a domestic or foreign government or any significant law enforcement agency;

• levels of government expenditures and authorizations for law enforcement and security related programs decrease or shift to programs in areas where we do not provide products and services;

• we are prevented from entering into new government contracts or extending existing government contracts based on violations or suspected violations of laws or regulations, including those related to procurement;

• we are not granted security clearances that are required to sell our products to domestic or foreign governments or such security clearances are deactivated;

• there is a change in government procurement procedures; or

• there is a change in political climate that adversely affects our existing or prospective relationships or

• there is a change in strategy and all software is to be developed internally by government personnel.

In addition, we must comply with domestic and foreign laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of government contracts. These laws and regulations affect how we do business with government agencies and may impose added costs on our business. Our government contracts may contain, or under applicable law may be deemed to contain, provisions not typically found in private commercial contracts, including provisions enabling the government party to:

• terminate or cancel existing contracts for convenience;

• suspend us from doing business with a foreign government or prevent us from selling our products in certain countries;

18

---

• audit and object to our contract-related costs and expenses, including allocated indirect costs; and

• unilaterally change contract terms and conditions, including warranty provisions, schedule, quantities, and scope of work, in advance of our agreement on corresponding pricing adjustments.

The effect of these provisions may significantly increase our cost to perform the contract or defer our ability to recognize revenue from such contracts. In some cases, this may mean that we must begin recording expenses on a contract in advance of being able to recognize the corresponding revenue. If a government customer terminates a contract with us for convenience, we may not recover our incurred or committed costs, receive any settlement of expenses, or earn a profit on work completed prior to the termination. If a government customer terminates a contract for default, we may not recover these amounts, and, in addition, we may be liable for any costs incurred by the government customer in procuring undelivered items and services from another source. Further, an agency within a government may share information regarding our termination with other agencies. As a result, our ongoing or prospective relationships with other government agencies could be impaired.

If our subcontractors fail to perform their contractual obligations, our ability to provide services and products to our customers, as well as our ability to obtain future business, may be harmed.

Many of our contracts involve subcontracts with other companies upon which we rely to perform a portion of the services that we must provide to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors, including disputes regarding the quality and timeliness of work performed by those subcontractors. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily perform the agreed-upon services may materially and adversely impact our ability to perform our obligations to our customers, could expose us to liability and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers, and if these relationships are interrupted, we may not be able to obtain substitute suppliers or manufacturers on favorable terms or at all.

We rely on non-affiliated suppliers for certain components which may be critical to our products, including both hardware and software, and on manufacturers of assemblies that are incorporated into our products. While we endeavor to use larger, more established suppliers and manufacturers wherever possible, in some cases, these providers may be smaller, more early-stage companies, particularly with respect to suppliers of new technologies we may incorporate into our products that we have not developed internally. Although we do have agreements in place with most of these providers, which include appropriate protections such as source code escrows where needed, these agreements are generally not long-term and these contractual protections offer limited practical benefits to us in the event our relationship with a key provider is interrupted. If these suppliers or manufacturers experience financial, operational, manufacturing capacity, or quality assurance difficulties, or cease production and sale of the products we buy from them entirely, or there is any other disruption in our relationships with these suppliers or manufacturers, we will be required to locate alternative sources of supply or manufacturing, to internally develop the applicable technologies, to redesign our products to accommodate an alternative technology, or to remove certain features from our products. This could increase the costs of, and create delays in, delivering our products or reduce the functionality of our products, which could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Risks associated with our distribution channels and key strategic partners, or our ability to develop such partnerships, may materially adversely affect our financial results.

We have agreements in place with many distributors, dealers and resellers to market and sell our products and services in addition to our direct sales force. We derive a significant percentage of our revenues from one of our distributor channels and new channels may, in the future, account for a significant percentage of our revenues. If our relationship in any of these sales channels deteriorates or terminates, we may lose important sales and marketing opportunities. In pursuing new partnerships and strategic alliances, we must often compete for the opportunity with similar solution providers. In order to effectively compete for such opportunities, we must introduce products tailored not only to meet specific partner needs, but also to evolving customer and prospective customer needs, and include innovative features and functionality easy for partners to sell and install. Even if we are able to win such opportunities on terms we find acceptable, there is no assurance that we will be able to realize the benefits we anticipate. Our competitors often seek to establish exclusive relationships with these sales channels or, at a minimum, to become a preferred partner for these sales channels. Some of our sales channel partners also partner with our competitors and may even offer our products and those of our competitors as alternatives when presenting bids to end customers. Our ability to achieve revenue growth depends to a significant extent on maintaining and adding to these sales channels and if we are unable to do so our revenue could be materially adversely affected.

19

---

Certain provisions in agreements that we have entered into may expose us to liability that is not limited in amount by the terms of the contract.

Certain contract provisions, principally confidentiality and indemnification obligations in certain of our license agreements, could expose us to risks of loss that, in some cases, are not limited to a specified maximum amount. Even where we are able to negotiate limitation of liability provisions, these provisions may not always be enforced depending on the facts and circumstances of the case at hand. If we or our products fail to perform to the standards required by our contracts, we could be subject to uncapped liability for which we may or may not have adequate insurance and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our results of operations could materially deteriorate if we fail to attract, develop and retain qualified employees.

Our performance is dependent on attracting and retaining qualified employees who are able to meet the wants and needs of our customers. We believe our competitive advantage is providing unique solutions for each individual customer, which requires us to have highly trained and engaged employees. Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including sales, service and administrative personnel. There is often intense competition to recruit highly skilled employees in the technology industry and the turnover rate is high. An inability to attract and retain highly qualified employees may have an adverse effect on our ability to develop new products and enhancements for existing products and to successfully market such products. Further, if we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees, on reasonable economic and other terms or at all, our ability to grow could be impaired, our ability to timely report our financial results could be adversely affected, and our operations and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our senior executives and other key personnel, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lost their services.

Our future success heavily depends on the continued service of our senior executives and other key employees. In particular, we rely on the expertise, experience, and business contacts of Mr. Ajay Batheja, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President; Mr. A.C. Narang, Vice President Government Strategy of Xalted Information; Mr. Luigi Caramico, Vice President Corporate Strategy; and Ms. Kamini Rupani, Vice President Marketing of Xalted Information. If one or more of our senior executives are unable or unwilling to continue to work for us in their present positions, we may have to spend a considerable amount of time and resources searching, recruiting, and integrating the replacements into our operations, which would substantially divert management’s attention from our business and severely disrupt our business. This may also adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy. Moreover, if any of our senior executives joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose customers, suppliers and key employees.

We may not be able to receive or retain the necessary licenses or authorizations required for us to export some of our products that we develop or manufacture in specific countries.

We are required to obtain export licenses or qualify for other authorizations from India to export some of the products that we develop in the country and, in any event, are required to comply with applicable export control laws of each country generally. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining or maintaining the licenses and other authorizations required to export our products from applicable government authorities. In addition, export laws and regulations are revised from time to time and can be extremely complex in their application; if we are found not to have complied with applicable export control laws, we may be fined or penalized by, among other things, having our ability to obtain export licenses curtailed or eliminated, possibly for an extended period of time. Our failure to receive or maintain any required export licenses or authorizations or our penalization for failure to comply with applicable export control laws would hinder our ability to sell our products and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

20

---

Indian and foreign governments could refuse to buy our homeland security solutions or could deactivate our security clearances in their countries thereby restricting or eliminating our ability to sell these solutions in those countries and perhaps influenced other countries by such a decision.

We maintain security clearances in India and other countries in connection with the development, marketing, sale, and support of our homeland security solutions. These clearances are reviewed from time to time by the applicable government agencies in these countries and, following these reviews, our security clearances are either maintained or deactivated. Our security clearances can be deactivated for many reasons, including that the clearing agencies in some countries may object to the fact that we do business in certain other countries. In the event that our security clearances are deactivated in any particular country, we would lose the ability to sell our homeland security solutions in that country for projects that require security clearances. Additionally, any inability to obtain or maintain security clearances in a particular country may affect our ability to sell our homeland security solutions in that country generally (even for non-secure projects). Any inability to obtain or maintain clearances can materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Whether or not we are able to maintain our security clearances, law enforcement and intelligence agencies in certain countries may decline to purchase homeland security solutions if they were not developed or manufactured in that country. As a result, because our homeland security solutions are developed or manufactured in whole or in part in India, there may be certain countries where some or all of the law enforcement and intelligence agencies are unwilling to purchase our homeland security solutions. If we are unable to sell our homeland security solutions in certain countries for this reason, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The mishandling or even the perception of mishandling of sensitive information could harm our business.

Our products are in some cases used by customers to compile and analyze highly sensitive or confidential information and data, including in some cases, information or data used in intelligence gathering or law enforcement activities. Customers are also increasingly focused on the security of our products. While our customers’ use of our products in no way affords us access to the customer’s sensitive or confidential information or data, we may come into contact with such information or data when we perform services or support functions for our customers. We have implemented policies and procedures to help ensure the proper handling of such information and data, including background screening of services personnel, non-disclosure agreements, access rules, and controls on our information technology systems. We also work to ensure the security of our products, including through the use of encryption, access rights, and other customary security features. However, these measures are designed to mitigate the risks associated with handling or processing sensitive data and cannot safeguard against all risks at all times. The improper handling of sensitive data, or even the perception of such mishandling or other security lapses or risks by us or our products, whether or not valid, could reduce demand for our products or otherwise expose us to financial or reputational harm.

Our intellectual property may not be adequately protected.

We have not filed any patent applications on our technology, and there can be no assurance that we will file any patent, trademark, or copyright applications, that any future applications will be approved, that any existing or future patents, trademarks or copyrights will adequately protect our intellectual property or that any existing or future patents, trademarks, or copyrights will not be challenged by third parties. Our intellectual property rights may not be successfully asserted in the future or may be invalidated, designed around, or challenged.

In order to safeguard our unpatented proprietary know-how, source code, trade secrets, and technology, we rely primarily upon trade secret protection and non-disclosure provisions in agreements with employees and other third parties having access to our confidential information. There can be no assurance that these measures will adequately protect us from improper disclosure or misappropriation of our proprietary information.

Preventing unauthorized use or infringement of our intellectual property rights is difficult. The laws of certain countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of India. Therefore, in certain jurisdictions we may be unable to protect our intellectual property adequately against unauthorized third-party use or infringement, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

Our products may infringe or may be alleged to infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, which could lead to costly disputes or disruptions for us and may require us to indemnify our customers and resellers for any damages they suffer.

The technology industry is characterized by frequent allegations of intellectual property infringement. Any allegation of infringement against us could be time consuming and expensive to defend or resolve, result in substantial diversion of management resources, cause product shipment delays, or force us to enter into royalty or license agreements. If patent holders or other holders of intellectual property initiate legal proceedings against us, we may be forced into protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the merits of these claims. We may not be successful in defending such litigation, in part due to the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation, and may not be able to procure any required royalty or license agreements on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Third parties may also assert infringement claims against our customers. Subject to certain limitations, we generally indemnify our customers and resellers with respect to infringement by our products of the proprietary rights of third parties. These claims may require us to initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the merits of these claims. If any of these claims succeed, we may be forced to pay damages, be required to obtain licenses for the products our customers or partners use, or incur significant expenses in developing non-infringing alternatives. If we cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our customers may be forced to stop using or, in the case of resellers and other partners, stop selling our products.

21

---

Reliance on or loss of third-party licensing agreements could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

While most of our products are developed internally, we also purchase technology, license intellectual property rights, and oversee third-party development and localization of certain products or components. If we lose or are unable to maintain licenses or distribution rights, we could incur additional costs or experience unexpected delays until an alternative solution can be internally developed or licensed from another third party and integrated into our products or we may be forced to redesign our products or remove certain features from our products. See “—We rely on a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers, and if these relationships are interrupted, we may not be able to obtain substitute suppliers or manufacturers on favorable terms or at all” above for additional information. Additionally, when purchasing or licensing products and services from third parties, we endeavor to negotiate appropriate warranties, indemnities, and other protections. We cannot assure you, however, that all such third-party contracts contain adequate protections or that all such third parties will be able to provide the protections we have negotiated. To the extent we are not able to negotiate adequate protections from these third parties or these third parties are unwilling or unable to provide the protections we have negotiated, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Use of free or open source software could expose our products to unintended restrictions and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Some of our products contain free or open source software and we anticipate making use of open source software in the future. Open source software is generally covered by license agreements that permit the user to use, copy, modify, and distribute the software without cost, provided that the users and modifiers abide by certain licensing requirements. The original developers of the open source software generally provide no warranties on such software or protections in the event the open source software infringes a third party’s intellectual property rights. Although we endeavor to monitor the use of open source software in our product development, we cannot assure you that past, present, or future products will not contain open source software elements that impose unfavorable licensing restrictions or other requirements on our products. In addition, the terms of many open source software licenses have not yet been interpreted by Indian or foreign courts and as a result there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on products that use such software. The introduction of certain kinds of open source software into our products or a court decision construing an open source software license in an unexpected way could require us to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering affected products, to re-engineer affected products, to discontinue sales of affected products, or to release all or portions of the source code of affected products under the terms of the applicable open source software licenses. Any of these developments could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have no insurance coverage in India, and any business disruption or litigation we experience may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources.

Insurance companies in India offer limited business interruption and liability insurance. While business interruption insurance is available to a limited extent in India, we have determined that the risks of disruption, cost of such insurance and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms had made it economically impractical for us to have such insurance. As a result, we do not have any business liability, disruption or litigation insurance coverage for our operations in India. Any business disruption or litigation may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources.

22

---

We may be exposed to potential risks relating to our internal controls over financial reporting and our ability to have those controls attested to by our independent auditors. If we are unable to receive a positive attestation from our independent auditors with respect to our internal controls when we are required under applicable laws, investors and others may lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements which could affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX 404, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on their internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm auditing the financial statements of a company that is not a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act must also attest to the operating effectiveness of the company’s internal controls. Since we just completed the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011, we have not evaluated Xalted Networks and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control systems in order to allow our management to report on our internal controls on a consolidated basis as required by these requirements of SOX 404. Under current law, we will be required to complete such evaluation and include the report of management in our annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

We can provide no assurance that our management will conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, or that our independent registered public accounting firm will issue a positive opinion on our internal controls over financial reporting when we are required under applicable laws. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could result in our not being able to accurately report our financial results, prevent or detect fraud or provide timely and reliable financial and other information pursuant to the reporting obligations we have as a public company, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, it could cause our investors to lose confidence in the information we report, which could adversely affect the price of our stock price.

Xalted Information is involved in litigation in India which, if successful, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, operations and prospects.

On or about March 3, 2010, Arasor Corporation, or Arasor, a California corporation no longer in good standing, filed a petition in the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore (the relevant court of original jurisdiction in India) seeking the winding up of Xalted Information based on alleged breaches of contract and other claims. The petition was admitted by a Single Bench Judge of that Court. The lower court’s action was appealed by Xalted Information to a Two Bench Judge in the Karnataka High Court, which stayed the operation of the lower court’s order. A further hearing in the case is anticipated in May 2011. At that hearing, Xalted Information will seek the dismissal of all claims against it not only based on a substantive defense to the allegations made in Arasor’s petition, but as a threshold matter based on the fact that because Arasor is no longer in good standing in California, it no longer has legal authority to prosecute or defend any litigation. Because of the inherent uncertainties involved in any litigation, however, we cannot assure you that our defenses will be successful or that the claims against Xalted Information will be dismissed. If the claims are not dismissed and there is eventually a judgment entered against Xalted Information, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and prospects.

RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN INDIA

A substantial portion of our assets and operations are located in India, and we are subject to regulatory, economic and political uncertainties in India.

Our principal operating subsidiary is incorporated in India, and a majority of our assets and our professionals are located in India. In the early 1990s, India experienced significant inflation, low growth in gross domestic product and shortages of foreign currency reserves. The Indian government, however, has exercised and continues to exercise significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy. India’s government has provided significant tax incentives and relaxed certain regulatory restrictions in order to encourage investment in specified sectors of the economy, including the telecom and homeland information security industries. Certain of those programs, which have benefited us, include tax holidays, liberalized import and export duties and preferential rules on foreign investment and repatriation. We cannot assure you that liberalization policies will continue. Various factors, such as changes in the current government, could trigger significant changes in India’s economic liberalization and deregulation policies and disrupt business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular.

23

---

In addition, the Government of India is considering introducing a reservation policy to the private sector in India, pursuant to which all private sector companies operating in India, including our subsidiary, would be required to reserve a certain percentage of jobs for the economically underprivileged population in the states where such companies are incorporated. If this policy is adopted, our ability to hire employees of our choice may be affected due to restrictions on our pool of potential employees and competition for these professionals.

Our financial performance may be adversely affected by general economic conditions and economic and fiscal policy in India, including changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates and taxation policies, as well as social stability and political, economic or diplomatic developments affecting India in the future. In particular, India has experienced significant economic growth over the last several years, but faces major challenges in sustaining that growth in the years ahead. These challenges include the need for substantial infrastructure development and improving access to healthcare and education. Our ability to recruit, train and retain qualified employees, develop and operate our operations centers, and attract and retain clients could be adversely affected if India does not successfully meet these challenges.

Currency fluctuations among the Indian Rupee and the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

A substantial portion of our revenues are denominated in Rupees. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. The exchange rates among the Rupee and the U.S. dollar have changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the future. The average Rupee/US. dollar exchange rate in 2010 was approximately 45.7159 (based on the Bloomberg Composite Rate), representing depreciation of the Rupee of 5.48% compared to the average exchange rate in 2009. Although we take steps to hedge a substantial portion of our Rupee/US. dollar foreign currency exposures, our results of operations may be adversely affected if the Rupee fluctuates significantly against the U.S. dollar, our hedging strategy is unsuccessful or if the hedging markets have insufficient liquidity or depth to allow us to implement our hedging strategy in a cost-effective manner. Any failure by our hedging counterparties to meet their contractual obligations there under could materially and adversely affect our profitability. We are subject to legal restrictions on hedging activities as well as the convertibility of currencies in India. This could limit our ability to use cash generated in one country in another country and could limit our ability to hedge our exposures. Finally, our hedging policies only provide near term protection from exchange rate fluctuations.

Our financial condition could be negatively affected if the Government of India reduces or withdraws tax benefits and other incentives currently provided to companies within our industry, or if the same are not available for other reasons.

Under the Income-Tax Act, 1961 of India, we have benefited from holidays from Indian corporate income taxes. We applied for and received tax holidays covering our telecom security business and our homeland security business. Both tax holidays were approved by the Government and run for a period of 10 years. The company also has a 10 year tax holiday for starting a new company in India in 2001. As a result, our service operations have to date been subject to relatively lower tax liabilities. We incurred minimal income tax expense in 2010 as a result of the tax holidays, compared to approximately $480,000 that we would have additionally incurred if the tax holidays had not been available for that period (without accounting for double taxation treaty set-offs). Our current tax holidays expire in 2011, 2015 and 2019. Consequently, our tax expense will materially increase in 2012 with the first tax holiday expiring and our after-tax profitability will be materially reduced.

In May 2007, the Government of India adopted the Indian Finance Act, 2007, with effect from April 1, 2007, that imposed a minimum alternative tax, or MAT, on Indian companies that have book profits but no tax profit which could be for various reasons, including tax holidays, tax deductions or significant depreciation. Any MAT paid by us can be carried forward for a maximum period of ten years and can be used as a credit against corporate income taxes payable by us after expiration of the tax holiday, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

24

---

If more stringent labor laws or other industry standards in India become applicable to us, our profitability may be adversely affected.

India has stringent labor legislation that protects the interests of workers, including legislation that sets forth detailed procedures for dispute resolution and employee removal and legislation that imposes financial obligations on employers upon retrenchment. In addition, we are subject to certain industry standards regarding our employees, particularly with regard to overtime and transportation of employees. Our employees may also in the future form unions. If these labor laws or industry standards become more stringent or are more strictly enforced, or if our employees unionize, it may become difficult for us to maintain flexible human resource policies, discharge employees or downsize, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The Government of India has recently focused on the occupational health and safety concerns experienced by workers in the outsourcing industry. The introduction of legislation imposing restrictions on working hours or conditions of professionals in the outsourcing industry could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Investors may have difficulty effecting service of process or enforcing judgments obtained in the United States against our subsidiary in India or our executive officers.

Our primary operating subsidiary and the majority of our operating assets are located in India. As a result, you may be unable to effect service of process upon our affiliates who reside in India outside their jurisdiction of residence. In addition, you may be unable to enforce against these persons outside the jurisdiction of their residence judgments obtained in courts of the United States, including judgments predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States.

Sections 44A and Section 13 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1908, or the Civil Code, govern recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Section 44A of the Civil Code provides for recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment without having to file an original suit in India, provided such judgments have been rendered by courts in a country or territory outside India which the Government of India has declared to be a reciprocating territory. We have been advised by our Indian counsel that the United States and India do not currently have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than certain arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not it is predicated upon the federal securities laws of the United States, would not be enforceable in India as such.

However, if the party in whose favor such final judgment is rendered brings a new suit in a competent court in India based on a final judgment that has been obtained in the United States, Section 13 of the Civil Code provides that the foreign judgment will be conclusive as to certain matters. The suit must be brought in India within three years of the date of the foreign judgment. It is unlikely, however, that a court in India would award damages on the same basis as a court in the United States if an action is brought in India. It is also unlikely that an Indian court would enforce judgments obtained in the United States if it viewed the amount of damages awarded as excessive or inconsistent with Indian practice.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence involving India could adversely affect the financial markets, result in a loss of client confidence and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may adversely affect worldwide financial markets and could potentially lead to economic recession. Such events could precipitate sudden significant changes in regional and global economic conditions and cycles, as well as pose risks to our people and to our operations centers. At the same time, an increased level of terrorism and other acts of violence could lead to increased demand for our products. If India were to become engaged in armed hostilities, however, particularly hostilities that were protracted or involved the threat or use of nuclear weapons, we might not be able to continue to operate. Our insurance policies may not insure us against losses and interruptions caused by terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war.

An outbreak of an infectious disease or any other serious public health concerns in Asia or elsewhere could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The outbreak of an infectious disease in Asia or elsewhere or any other serious public health concerns could have a negative impact on the economies, financial markets and business activities in the countries in which our end markets are located, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Past outbreaks of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, avian influenza, or bird flu, or H1N1 across Asia and Europe have adversely affected a number of countries and companies. Although we have not been adversely impacted by these recent outbreaks, we can give no assurance that a future outbreak of an infectious disease among humans or animals or any other serious public health concerns will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

25

---

We are vulnerable to natural disasters that could severely disrupt the normal operation of our business and adversely affect our business, results of operation and financial condition.

India is susceptible to natural disasters, including typhoons, tsunamis, floods and earthquakes. Substantially all of our operations and employees are located in India. If our operations centers are damaged by a typhoon, tsunami, flood, earthquake or other natural disaster, our operations and our ability to provide services to our clients could be interrupted or delayed significantly. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses. In addition, although all of our operations have access to other power sources, disaster management facilities in India may not be adequate to protect against potential losses. In addition, clients may terminate their contracts with us if we cannot resume providing services quickly enough. As a result, a natural disaster in India could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK GENERALLY

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The OTC Bulletin Board is a significantly more limited market than the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ. The quotation of our shares on the OTC Bulletin Board may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future. We plan to list our common stock as soon as practicable. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of any stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain any such listing.

We may be subject to penny stock regulations and restrictions and you may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock.

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define so-called “penny stocks” to be an equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. Our common stock is a “penny stock” and is subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act, or the Penny Stock Rule. This rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” (generally, individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouses). For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to sale. As a result, this rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and may affect the ability of purchasers to sell any of our securities in the secondary market, thus possibly making it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require delivery, prior to any transaction in penny stock, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. Disclosure is also required to be made about sales commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements are required to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stock.

There can be no assurance that our common stock will qualify for exemption from the Penny Stock Rule. In any event, even if our common stock were exempt from the Penny Stock Rule, we would remain subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the authority to restrict any person from participating in a distribution of penny stock, if the SEC finds that such a restriction would be in the public interest.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Accordingly, investors must be prepared to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation to earn an investment return, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board deems relevant.

26

---

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation may make it more difficult for a third party to effect a change-of-control.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes the board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the board of directors without further action by the stockholders. These terms may include preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of any preferred stock could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and therefore could reduce the value of such common stock. In addition, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with, or sell assets to, a third party. The ability of the board of directors to issue preferred stock could make it more difficult, delay, discourage, prevent or make it more costly to acquire or effect a change-in-control, which in turn could prevent our stockholders from recognizing a gain in the event that a favorable offer is extended and could materially and negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are an information security company based in Mumbai, India. We provide advanced solutions that enable companies and public organizations, including governments and law enforcement agencies, to capture, manage and analyze structured and unstructured data to enhance business and operational performance and address security threats. Our current geographic focus is on India and surrounding countries in Asia, as well as Africa, the Middle East and South America.

In the telecom security market, we provide FMS, OSS and BSS solutions to major telecommunications service providers. Our telecom security customers include major telecom companies and organizations in India, such as BSNL, MTNL and CDOT, the telecom technology development center of the Government of India. BSNL is India’s oldest and largest communications service provider and one of its largest cellular service providers. It has footprints throughout India, except for the metropolitan cities of Mumbai and New Delhi, which are managed by MTNL. Telecom customers outside of India include Mcel, Nepal Telecom, Nepal Satellite Telecom, Telecom Italia and Hutchison 3G.

In the homeland security market, our security solutions are vital to governments and law enforcement agencies in their efforts to protect people and property and neutralize terrorism and crime. Our homeland security customers include the Government of India and local and regional law enforcement agencies and bodies in India, such as the Anti-Terrorist Squads in Mumbai, Maharashtra and Goa, the STF (Special Task Force) in Uttarakand, and the Cyber Crime Division of Thane.

Our corporate headquarters is located in Mumbai. We also have development centers in Mumbai and Bangalore and sales offices in Mumbai and New Delhi.

Recent Developments

On May 13, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Xalted Networks in exchange for 2,326,844 shares of our common stock, which constituted 35% of our issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the acquisition.

See “Description of Business—Our Corporate History and Background” for more details regarding this transaction.

Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance

Our operating results are primarily affected by the following factors:

• Information technology spending. Our growth is dependent on information technology spending, which is influenced by changes in domestic and global economic conditions. Slowdowns or recessions around the world may cause companies and governments to delay, reduce, or even cancel planned spending. In addition, the market for our homeland security solutions is highly dependent on the spending cycle and spending scope of the Government of India, as well as local, state and municipal governments and security organizations in international markets.

27

---

 

• Product offering and pricing. Our business depends, in large part, on our ability to successfully introduce new products, services and technologies to consumers, the frequency of such introductions, the level of consumer acceptance, and the related impact on the demand for existing products, services and technologies. We strive to offer new products to address changing consumer tastes and preferences and intend to maintain competitive pricing in order to gain additional market share and revenue growth.

• Market acceptance of our homeland security solutions. Our homeland security solutions are in an early market stage where the value of our products and services is still in the process of gaining market acceptance. We believe that our future growth depends in part on the continued and increasing acceptance of the value of our homeland security solutions.

Taxation

Kranem Corporation and Xalted Networks are subject to United States tax. No provision for income taxes in the United States has been made as these companies have no income taxable in the United States.

In India the corporate income tax rate for a domestic company is a flat rate of 30%. For companies with a gross revenue in excess of Indian Rupees 1 crore, approximately US$ 10 million, there is a 5% surcharge. There is also an education fee of 3%, which is applied to both the corporate tax and surcharge. The combination of these three corporate taxation items produces an effective tax rate for domestic companies with gross revenue in excess of Indian Rupees 1 crore of 32.5% . Due to the various tax holidays enjoyed by Xalted Information Systems, Xalted is currently paying a corporate tax rate of approximately 12%. However, the current tax rate will begin to increase during 2011 as the first of the tax holidays begins to expire.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, both in dollars and as a percentage of our revenues. Since Xalted Networks was not established until March 14, 2011 and did not acquire Xalted Information until May 13, 2011, the results of operations below refer only to that of Xalted Information.

	2010						2009
					% of						% of
		Amount			Revenues			Amount			Revenues
Revenues	$	7,922,315			100.0		$	5,309,083			100.0
Cost of revenues		5,078,414			64.1			3,277,246			61.7
Gross profit		2,843,901			35.9			2,031,837			38.3
Operating expenses
Selling and marketing expenses		418,451			5.3			509,287			9.6
General and administrative expenses		545,648			6.9			1,093,036			20.6
Total operating expenses		964,099			12.2			1,602,323			30.2
Income from operations		1,879,802			23.7			429,514			8.1
Other income (expenses)
Interest income
Interest expense		20,634			0.3			75,255			1.4
Other income, net		416,378			5.3			439,459			8.3
Total other income (expenses)		395,744			5.0			364,204			6.9
Income before income taxes		2,275,546			28.7			793,718			15.0
Provision for income taxes		276,175			3.5			-14,347			-0.3
Net income	$	1,999,371			25.2		$	808,065			15.2

28

---

Revenues. We generate revenues from sales of our integrated information security products and through the related after-sales services. Our revenues were $7.9 million for 2010, compared to $5.3 million for 2009, an increase of $2.6 million, or 49%. Such increase was primarily due to an increase in sales the telecom security market through a combination of increased sales to both new and existing customers. The most dramatic increase was seen in one of the Company’s existing telecom security customers, who’s sales increased by 187%. Accordingly, the single area of greatest increase was in the telecom security with existing customers. For 2010, sales from our telecom security solutions and homeland security solutions accounted for 69.9% and 30.1%, respectively, of our revenues, as compared to 53.7% and 46.3% for 2009. In 2009, the Company saw a significant increase in its homeland security products, primarily with existing customers. In 2010, the Company saw a shift in the revenue growth from homeland security products to telecom security. The Company believes that the shift in revenue was driven by the release of new products in 2009 and their initial deployment in late 2009 that carried through into 2010. We anticipate that we will see a significant increase in the homeland security products with the release of two new modules in the first quarter of 2011.

Cost of revenue. Our cost of revenue primarily consists of software development and deployment costs . Cost of revenue increased $1.8 million, or 55%, to $5.1 million in 2010 from $3.3 million in 2009. This increase was mainly due to the development of new product modules and the more time-consuming installation and integration requirements of the homeland security product modules. The Company does not segregate its development and deployment costs by industry group served, but rather as a lump sum figure for the Company.

Gross profit and gross margin. Our gross profit is equal to the difference between our revenues and our cost of revenue. Our gross profit increased $812,000, or 40%, to $2.8 million in 2010 from $2.0 million in 2009. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (gross margin) was 35.9% and 38.3% for 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in the gross margin was primarily due to the dramatic increase in the sales of telecom security products to existing customers.

Selling and marketing expenses. Our selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits to our sales and marketing staffs, business travels after-sale support, transportation costs and other sales related costs. Selling and marketing expenses decreased $91,000, or 17.8%, to $418,000 in 2010, from $509,000 in 2009. As a percentage of revenues, our selling expenses decreased to 5.3% for 2010 from 9.6% for 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the rapid increase in telecom security product sales to existing customers, while controlling certain marketing and sales expenses in 2010. There was no one dominate area of expense reduction versus an overall controlling of costs.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits to our general management, finance and administrative staff, professional advisor fees, audit fees and other expenses incurred in connection with general operations. General and administrative expenses decreased by $547,000, or 50%, to $546,000 in 2010, from $1.1 million in 2009. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 6.9% for 2010 from 20.6% for 2009. Such decrease was primarily due to no reserves for bad debts being taken in 2010 versus a reserve of $589,000 in 2009. The Company was also able to control administrative expenses in 2010, which also helped. The combination of the increased sales for 2010, the elimination of the reserve for bad debts partially associated with the hardware business and the control of expenses in 2010; all aided in the improvement of the general and administrative expenses in 2010.

Total other income (expenses). We had $396,000 in total other income in 2010, as compared to other income of $364,000 in 2009. The largest component of other income is the currency fluctuation between the Indian Rupee and the U.S. Dollar. In both 2010 and 2009, the Indian Rupee strengthened against the U.S. Dollar providing us with additional income. The amounts of the additional income in 2010 and 2009 were very similar at $236,000 and $251,000, respectively. The one component providing the increase in other income between 2010 and 2009 was the reduction in interest expenses by $50,000 from 2009 to 2010.

Income before income taxes. Our income before income taxes increased by $1.5 million, or 186.7%, to $2.3 million in 2010 from $794,000 in 2009. Such increase was mainly due to the increased revenue from the telecom security product line; however, of secondary importance was the reduction in the Company’s operating expenses.

Income tax expense. Income tax expense increased by $291,000, to $276,000 in 2010, from ($140,000 in 2009. The increase was mainly due to the increase in revenue associated with the telecom security product offering.

29

---

Net income. As a result of the factors described above, net income increased by $1.2 million, or 147.4%, to $2.0 million for 2010 from $808,000 for 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $718,000. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through cash flows from operations, augmented by equity contributions by our stockholders.

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated
Cash Flow
		Year Ended December 31,
		2010			2009
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	-1,006,014		$	1,207,076
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,136,793			-912,887
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		0			0
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balance		16,608			3,792
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		147,387			297,981
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		397,987			100,006
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period		545,374			397,987

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was ($1.0 million) in 2010, as compared to $1.2 million net cash provided by operating activities in 2009. The decrease in net cash used by the operating activities was mainly due to the Company’s conclusion in the sale of its hardware businesses and the payment of the associated accounts payable to the various suppliers. While the completion of the sale of hardware business had a negative cash effect on the Company’s operations, the long-term financial benefits will be significant with the elimination of a business unit that consistently required cash investments. The greatest benefit associated with the completion of the sale of the hardware business is the Company’s profitability in 2009 and further improved profitability in 2010. The elimination of the hardware businesses and the Company’s ability to focus on its software businesses exclusively lead to the dramatic turnaround in the Company’s overall financial performance.

Investing Activities

Net cash used provided by investing activities in 2010 was $1.1 million, as compared to ($913,000) in net cash used in investing activities in 2009. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities was mainly attributable to the Company’s profitable operation in 2009 and 2010.

Loan Commitments

The Company does not have any loan commitments:

We believe that our cash on hand and cash flow from operations will meet our present ongoing cash needs. The Company may require additional cash resources, including loans, to meet its working capital needs for the next 12 months; should the Company decide to pursue a potential acquisition. We may, however, in the future, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions, implementation of our strategy to ramp up our marketing efforts and increase brand awareness, or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our own financial resources are insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit facilities. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could require us to agree to operating and financial covenants that would restrict our operations. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by us to raise additional funds on terms favorable to us, or at all, could limit our ability to expand our business operations and could harm our overall business prospects.

Obligations under Material Contracts

We have no other long term debt, capital or operating lease or fixed purchase obligations.

30

---

Inflation

Inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our business in the foreseeable future. However, our management will closely monitor price changes in our industry and continually maintain effective cost control in operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor in our securities.

Seasonality

Our operating results and operating cash flows historically have not been subject to seasonal variations. This pattern may change, however, as a result of new market opportunities or new product introduction.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported, including the notes thereto, and related disclosures of commitments and contingencies, if any. We have identified certain accounting policies that are significant to the preparation of our financial statements. These accounting policies are important for an understanding of our financial condition and results of operation. Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s difficult, subjective, or complex judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting the estimate may differ significantly from management’s current judgments. We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements:

Basis of preparation: The financial statements of Xalted are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States ("US GAAP"). The financial statements are presented in United States Dollars ($). The financial statements are prepared for the calendar year ended December 31, 2010 with comparatives for the previous calendar year (2009). The purpose of preparation of these financial statements is for submission to the parent company for consolidation purpose. It being the first time that the financial statements are prepared as per US GAAP, the balances of assets and liabilities as on January 1, 2009 have been reinstated to conform with the recognition and measurement principles of US GAAP.

Use of estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as on the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Examples of such estimates include: project completion dates, time and cost required to complete projects for purposes of revenue recognition and future revenue, expense and cash flow estimates for purposes of impairment analysis and loss contract evaluation, allowance for doubtful debts, obligations under employee benefit plans, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, useful lives of premises and equipment (fixed assets) and income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Foreign Currency:

Initial measurement: The transactions in foreign currency are recorded in functional currency at the exchange rates between foreign currency and functional currency prevailing as on the date of the transactions.

Subsequent measurement: Foreign Currency monetary Assets and liabilities are translated into functional currency at year end exchange rates. Gains or losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in the Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) within other income (expense), net.

31

---

As the functional currency of the company is Indian Rupee (Rs), to present the financial statement in United States Dollars ($), the results and financial position are translated as follows:

• Assets and liabilities except equity and retained earnings are translated at the closing exchange rate at the date of the Balance Sheet.

• Income and expenditure for each income statement are translated at quarterly average exchange rate during each period.

• Equities are translated at the rate of date of acquisition. The retained earnings as at December 31, 2008 are translated at closing rate of December, 31, 2008 which is not expected to have any material variance.

All resulting exchange differences are recognized as a component of equity.

Revenue Recognition: Revenue from software services consist of revenues earned from services performed either on a time-and-material basis or under fixed price contracts. Revenues earned from services performed on a "time and material" basis are recognized as services are performed on the basis of billable time spent by employees working on the project, priced at the contracted rate. Revenue from Software development on fixed-price, where there is no uncertainty as to the measurement or collectability of consideration that will be derived on completion of the contract, is recognized as per the percentage of completion method as determined based on the certification of the Technical Head of the respective project. Revenue recognition using the percentage of-completion method in conformity with ASC Topic 605, is based on the guidance in ASC Topic 985, Software Revenue Recognition, to account for revenues under fixed price arrangements for software development and related services. Losses on such contracts are recognized when probable. Revenues in excess of billings are recognized as accrued income in the balance sheet; to the extent billings are in excess of revenues recognized, the excess is reported as deferred revenues in the balance sheet. In accordance with ASC Topic 605, "Income Statement Characterization of reimbursements received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred", Xalted accounts for reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenues in the Statement of Income.

All revenues are recognized only when collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, and are reported net of discounts and indirect and service taxes.

Deferred revenue includes payments that have been received and recorded prior to performance.

Cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses: Cost of revenues primarily include the compensation cost of technical staff, consultancy charges, depreciation and amortization on dedicated assets and system software, application software costs, travel costs, data communication expenses and other attributable expenses incurred that are related to the generation of revenue. Selling, general and administrative expenses generally include the compensation costs of sales, management and administrative personnel, travel costs, advertising, professional charges, rent, repairs, electricity, office maintenance expenses and other general expenses not attributable to cost of revenues.

Cash and cash equivalents: Xalted considers investments in highly liquid instruments that are purchased with remaining maturities, of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and claims to cash that are restricted as to withdrawal or use in the ordinary course of business is classified separately under other current and non-current assets.

Fair value of financial instruments: Effective April 1, 2009, Xalted adopted SFAS No. 157 (ASC No 820) limited to financial assets and liabilities, which primarily relate to Xalted's investments. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable and consists of the following three levels:

Level 1- Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2- Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3- Inputs which are unobservable reflecting internal assumptions are used in pricing assets or liabilities.

Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents the Company’s best estimate of receivables that are doubtful of recovery based on a specific identification basis. The Company currently has $ 2,728,869/- and $ 6,420,077/- of accounts receivable that has been outstanding for more than a year as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively, out of which $ 216,284/- and $ 216,284/- is covered by the allowance for doubtful accounts as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively.

32

---

Inventories: Inventories are work in progress, which are valued based on the percentage of work completed / consumption. Cost includes cost of hardware/ software, related employees costs and overhead costs up to the date of financial statement.

Premises, equipment and depreciation: Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:

	Estimated Useful Life
Computer & Peripherals	3 to 5 years
Communication Equipments	3 to 7 years
Lab Equipment	5 to 10 years
Office Equipment	5 years
Motor Vehicle	6 years
Air Conditioner	7 years
Furniture and Fittings	10 years
Digital Loop Carriers	3 years
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of Lease period or estimated useful life

Intangible Assets: Xalted amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis unless such life is deemed indefinite. The intangible asset of the Company comprises of internal use softwares. Software product development costs are expensed as incurred unless technical and commercial feasibility of the project is demonstrated, future economic benefits are probable, we have the intention and ability to complete and use or sell the software and the costs can be measured reliably. The costs which can be capitalized include the cost of material, direct labour, overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Research and development costs and software development costs incurred under contractual arrangements with customers are accounted as cost of sales. During 2010 and 2009, software amounts capitalized on account of internal use were $ 20,104 and $1,613 respectively. Amortization of internal use software begins when the software is placed in use and continues on the straight-line method generally over a life of five years.

Amortizable intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits consumed in each period. The estimated useful life of the Intangible assets is 5 years.

Impairment of long-lived assets: Long-lived assets and assets group, including certain identifiable intangible assets, to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Such assets are considered to be impaired if the carrying amount of the assets is higher than the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the assets. The impairment amount to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair value. Assets held-for-sale is reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less costs to sell. However, based on the above exercise no adjustment on account of impairment is required.

Investments: Xalted classifies investments in mutual funds with readily determinable fair market values as available-for-sale securities and is recorded at fair value. Accordingly, such securities are carried at fair value. Realized gains and losses and decline in value considered to be other-than-temporary are included in other income. The cost of securities sold is determined on the first-in-first-out (FIFO) method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in other income. The company does not have any securities classified as trading.

Borrowing Cost: Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition of qualifying asset are capitalized, till the asset is put to use, as part of the cost of the asset. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.

Income taxes: Income tax expense comprises current tax expense and the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability during the year.

Current income taxes: The current income tax expense includes Indian income taxes payable for Xalted after taking credit for benefits available for operations in Software Technology Parks (or STPs) and export earnings, and after offsetting benefits under tax avoidance treaties for foreign taxes payable in overseas jurisdictions. Current income tax payable is computed in accordance with the tax laws applicable in India. The amounts paid are generally available for offset as tax credits in India towards the income tax liability. Payments of advance taxes and income taxes payable in the same tax jurisdictions are offset.

33

---

Deferred income taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating loss carry forwards and tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period of change.

Uncertain tax positions are recognized using the more likely-than-not threshold determined solely based on technical merits that the tax positions will sustain upon examination. Tax positions that meet the recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement with relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information.

Earnings per share: In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share", basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income attributable to shareholders of Xalted by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.

Cash flow statement : The cash flow statement has been drawn up in accordance with the indirect method, classifying cash flows as cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. The effect of currency translation has been given to various items of cash flow statement. The difference between the net cash flow and the change in Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet due to exchange rate differences are disclosed separately as part of the reconciliation of the net cash flow and the balance sheet change in Cash and cash equivalents.

Employment benefits:

Provident fund: In accordance with Indian law, all employees are entitled to receive benefits under the Provident Fund, which is a defined contribution plan. Both the employee and the employer make monthly contributions to the plan at a predetermined rate (presently 12%) of the employees' basic salary. Xalted has no further obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions. These contributions are made to fund administered and managed by the Government of India. Xalted's monthly contributions are charged to income in the period it is incurred.

Employees state insurance fund: In addition to the above benefit, all employees in India who are drawing gross salary of less than Rs. 15,000 per month are entitled to receive benefit under employee state insurance fund scheme. The employer makes contribution to the scheme at a predetermined rate (presently 4.75%) of employee's gross salary. Xalted has no further obligations under the scheme beyond its monthly contributions. These contributions are made to fund administered and managed by the Government of India. Xalted’s monthly contributions are charged to income in the year it is incurred.

Gratuity plan: In addition to the above benefits, Xalted provides for a gratuity obligation, a defined benefit retirement plan (the "Gratuity Plan") covering all its employees in India. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or termination of employment based on the respective employee's salary, and the years of employment with Xalted. Xalted provides for the Gratuity Plan on the basis of actuarial valuation. Xalted makes yearly contributions under the gratuity plan administered and managed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India ('LIC'). Gratuity payable is recognized in the Balance Sheet. Gratuity payable is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets with LIC and the projected benefit obligation at December 31, the measurement date. (Gains)/losses arise as a result of differences between actual experience and assumptions or as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions. These are recognized as and when they arise. Net periodic gratuity cost is recorded in the Statement of Income and includes service cost, interest cost, and return on plan assets. Actuarial gains/losses are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income statement.

Leave Encashment: The Company has other long term employee benefits in the nature of leave encashment (Compensated Absences). The liability in respect of leave encashment is provided for on the basis of actuarial valuation made at end of the calendar year, as the said schemes meet the requirement of relevant ASC.

Dividends: Final dividend on the common stock is recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the stockholders. Interim dividends are recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the board of directors.

Warranty Costs: The Company provides for the estimated costs of fulfilling their obligations for contracts under warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. The Company regularly evaluates the estimates to assess the adequacy of the recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amount as necessary.

34

---

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" (the "Codification"). The Codification does not alter current U.S. GAAP, but rather integrates existing accounting standards with other authoritative guidance. Under the Codification, there is a single source of authoritative US GAAP for non governmental entities and it supersedes all other previously issued non-SEC accounting and reporting guidance. The Codification is effective for financial statement periods ending after September 15, 2009. Our adoption of the Codification did not have a material effect on our financial condition.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 855-10 "Subsequent events", which is effective for interim and Annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The guidance is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations r cash flows. See note 29 for further details.

In December 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 132(R)-1, Disclosures about Employers' Plan Assets. Through this FSP, amendments were made in Statement 132 (R) (ASC Topic 715), “Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.” The FSP enhances the disclosures required about employers' plan assets, including employers' investment strategies, major categories of plan assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets, and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets. This FSP is effective on December 30, 2008. An entity must provide the FSP's disclosures in financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Because the guidance applies only to financial statement disclosures, the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On 30 September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, “Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share.” ASU 2009-12 amends ASC 820 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) by providing additional guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. Under the amended guidance, entities are permitted, as a practical expedient, to estimate the fair value of investments within its scope using the net asset value (NAV) per share of the investment as of the reporting entities measurement dates. The amended guidance applies only to investments in entities that calculate NAV consistent with the measurement principles of ASC 946 (i.e., entities that measure investment assets at fair value on a recurring basis). Our adoption of the ASU did not have a material effect on our financial condition or consolidated results of operations.

PROPERTIES

We currently lease 10 different office properties in four different locations in India with a total of 43,700 square feet of space. Each property is under a separate lease agreement comprised of a combination of administrative offices and areas that operate the Company’s servers and computers systems. The various lease agreements begin to expire in June 2011 through March 2015. For leases expiring in 2011, we have already begun the renewal negotiations. Under the current lease agreements, we pay an aggregate monthly rent of Rs. 2.8 million (approximately $64,000) per month. We believe that all leased space is in good condition and that the property is adequately insured by the owner.

35

---

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 16, 2011 (i) by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company at the address on the front page of this filing.

			Amount and
			Nature of	Percent
Name and Address of			Beneficial	of
Beneficial Owner	Office, If Any	Title of Class	Ownership(1)	Class(2)
Officers and Directors
Ajay Batheja	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President	Common Stock	0	0
Edward Miller	Treasurer, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer	Common Stock	0	0
Stephen K. Smith 5425 Petticoat Lane Austin, TX 78746	Director	Common Stock	45,000	<1%
All officers and directors as a group (persons named above)		Common Stock	45,000	<1%
5% Security Holders
Xalted Holding Corporation(3)		Common Stock	2,326,843	35.0%
Imprenord ME(4)		Common Stock	2,094,159	31.5%
Empire Capital, L.P. (5)		Common Stock	598,331	9.0%
Peter Richards(6)		Common Stock	299,166	4.5%

(1)	Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to our common stock.
(2)	A total of 6,648,125 shares of our common stock are considered to be outstanding pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1) as of May 16, 2011. For each beneficial owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been included in the denominator.
(3)	Voting and investment authority with regard to the shares held by Xalted Holding Corporation is held by Ajay Betheja, the President of Xalted Holding Corporation. Mr. Batheja is also our Chairman and CEO.
(4)	Voting and investment authority with regard to the shares held by Imprenord ME is held by Jeetendra Chauhan, the Treasurer of Imprenord ME.
(5)	Voting and investment authority with regard to the shares held by Empire Capital, L.P. is held by Peter Richards, a partner in and the fund manager of Empire Capital. Peter Richards also directly holds 4.5% shares of our common stock.
(6)	Peter Richards also holds voting and investment authority with regard to the shares of our common stock held by Empire Capital, L.P.

36

---

Changes in Control

We are aware of no arrangements which if consummated may result in a change of control of our Company.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

Directors and Executive Officers

The following sets forth information about our directors and executive officers as of the date of this report

NAME	AGE	POSITION
Ajay Batheja	55	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (1)
Edward Miller	59	Treasurer, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer (2)
V.R. Ranganath	56	Director (3)
Luigi Caramico	45	Director; V.P., Corporate Strategy (3)
Stephen K. Smith	69	Director (4)
B.T. Jumani	60	Chief Operating Officer, Xalted Information
A.C. Narang	76	V.P. Government Strategy, Xalted Information
Kamini Rupani	50	V.P. Marketing
B.N. Ramakrishnan	50	Vice President Controller

(1)	Became our Chief Executive Officer and a director upon our acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011.
(2)	Became an officer upon our acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011.
(3)	Will become a director on the 10th day following our mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders.
(4)	Former President prior to closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011and current director until the 10th day following our mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders.

Ajay Batheja. Mr. Batheja became our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011 and has been the Chief Executive Officer of Xalted Information since 2003. Mr. Batheja He has over three decades of extensive international experience in sales & marketing, operations management and partnership development; within the telecommunications and software sector. Prior to joining Xalted, he had worked in various capacities at Rockwell International, OAZ Communications, Incoda Corporation, and Ricoh Corporation. Mr. Batheja holds an MBA Degree from Pepperdine University and an MSEE Degree in Electrical Engineering from the Clemson University.

Edward Miller. Mr. Miller became our Treasurer, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer upon the completion of our acquisition of Xalted Networks. Mr. Miller has over 30 years of experience in both financial and operational management. He worked for General Instrument for 8 years in various financial capacities with 5 of years working in Europe. He left General Instrument with the sale of its optoelectronics business, which he oversaw. During 1994-1998, Mr. Miller worked for SteriGenics International a start-up that went public in 1997 on the NASDAQ. He left in 1998 and joined Digital Video Systems a NASDAQ listed company, playing an instrumental role in the restructuring while promoted to CEO. He streamlined the business leading the increase if share price from $0.25 to $2.25 in les than 9 months. Ed has assisted startups and early stage companies with their business planning and fund raising activities. Mr. Miller has held senior executive positions as CEO, CFO & Secretary, VP of Finance & Administration, Controller and Consultant. His experience included working for MUSIC Semiconductors, Analect Consulting Group and SemIndia USA, Inc. Mr. Miller holds a Bachelors Degree from Ohio University in Finance.

37

---

Luigi Caramico. Mr. Caramico became our Vice President Corporate Strategy upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011. Mr. Caramico will also become a member of our board of directors on the tenth day following the mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders, which will be mailed on or about May 20, 2011. Luigi serves as the President & CEO of DRS Lab. Previously, he was the president of Intelligentias Inc. From 2006 to 2003, he was the President and CEO of Systeam US, Inc., (the holding company of Systeam Italy SpA). From 2003 to 1998, he was Chief Technical Officer and a board member of Systeam Italy SpA. Mr. Caramico holds five patents and his expertise in the areas of computer security, broadband and digital video technology are important to the future success of Xalted. Mr. Caramico is a graduate of the University of Rome and holds a degree in computer science.

V.R. Ranganath. Mr. Ranganath will become a member of our board of directors on the tenth day following the mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders, which will be mailed on or about May 20, 2011. He has been a member of the board of directors of Xalted Information since 2000. Mr. Ranganath is experienced in Venture Capital Fund Management and Technology Sector executive with over 25 years of accomplishments in technology investments. Mr. Ranganath was the founder and president of Alliance Venture Management managing a $192M venture fund which had significant financial success. He was responsible for all aspects of the traditional venture fund over 9 years, which ranked among the top 5%of the vintage 1999 funds. Mr. Ranganath helped established Sandalwood Partners, a traditional venture fund for cross border investments, and served as Advisor to VCM Capital Management GMBH, Germany, and a European Fund of funds for investment into India funds. Mr. Ranganath holds a BSEE from Bengaluru University in India and a MSEE from Utah State University.

B.T. Jumani. Mr. Jumani became our Chief Operating Officer – Xalted India upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011 and has been the Chief Operating Officer of Xalted Information since 2011. Mr. Jumani has over three decades of experience in IT and Telecom Industries. He has worked in the sunrise areas throughout his career in various senior positions principally in the areas of systems development and implementation. Mr. Jumani has worked in well-known companies in India and abroad, such as the Tata Group, HCL, NEC, Motorola, Hinduja, and Etisalat. Mr. Jumani holds a B.Tech degree in Electrical Engineering majoring in Computers and Digital Electronics from IIT Mumbai.

A.C. Narang. Mr. Narang became our Vice President Government Strategies upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011 and has been in the same capacity with Xalted Information since 2004. Prior to joining Xalted Information Systems, Mr. Narang has over three decades of top management experience in leading organizations engaged in power, petrochemicals, instrumentation, telecom and spearheading the growth of multi-disciplinary business units. He is empanelled as a Consultant with the World Bank, ADB and AfDB. Narang worked as a whole time Director on the Board of TCIL and was the founder Director of telecom companies set up in joint venture with Bellsouth, Essex Technologies, Vanguard USA and Nepostel Holland.

B.N. Ramakrishnan. Mr. Ramakrishnan became our Vice President Controller upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011 and is the Chief Financial Officer of Xalted Information since 2005. Prior to joining Xalted, Mr. Ramakrishnan was CFO & Company Secretary and as Vice President & Company Secretary in several companies including Unisys, Monsanto and the Garden Vareli Group. He holds a Masters Degree and a Bachelors Degree in Law and Accounting.

Kamini Rupani. Ms. Rupani became our Vice President Marketing upon closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011 and has served in the same position with Xalted Information since 2009.Prior to joining Xalted, Ms. Rupani established an impressive background in international marketing for widely recognized information technology and telecom software companies in the United States, including Avocent (acquired by Emerson Power), Callipso, LongBoard and Go Remote (acquired by Ipass). She has held several senior product management and marketing leadership positions responsible for various product lines’ life cycle management and revenue growth. Ms. Rupani holds an MBA degree from Stuart School of Business, Chicago concentrating in IT & Marketing and a Bachelor’s degree in Marketing and Economics from the Osmania University.

38

---

Stephen K. Smith. Mr. Smith served as our President and director since January 21, 2004. On May 13, 2011, he submitted a resignation letter pursuant to which he resigned as our President, effective immediately, and from our board of directors, effective on the tenth day following the mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders, which will be mailed on or about May 20, 2011. Between 2000 and his association with our Company, Mr. Smith was managing his investments. Prior to that, he held the following positions with Dell Computer Corporation: Director of Operations, from 1997 to 2000; Director of Worldwide Product Development, from 1995 to 1997; Director of Customer Service and Technical Support, from 1992 to 1995; and Senior Manufacturing Manager, from 1989 to 1992. Between 1964 and 1989, Mr. Smith was in the United States Marine Corps. Mr. Smith received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Hanover College in 1964 and his Master of Arts degree from the University of Northern Colorado in 1978.

Directors are elected until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Except as noted above, there are no other agreements or understandings for any of our executive officers or directors to resign at the request of another person and no officer or director is acting on behalf of nor will any of them act at the direction of any other person.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Transactions with Related Persons,” none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Significant Employees

In addition to the foregoing named officers and directors, the following employees are also key to our business and operations:

NAME	AGE	POSITION
G. Venkateswarlu	45	Director, Engineering, Xalted Information
Deepak Nandwani	38	Director, Program Management, Xalted Information
Hrishikesh Kulkarni	35	Principle Architect, Xalted Information

G. Venkateswarhu. Mr. Venkateswarhu has over 15 years in the field of Software Development Delivery & Project Management in the telecom industry. He is responsible for streamlining the development schedule and processes in Xalted while also managing the software development and QA teams. Mr. Venkateswarhu has previously worked with companies such as Teleonto Technologies, Metaminds Software, Kido Software, where he held various positions including General Manager – Software Delivery.

Deepak Nandwani. Mr. Nandwani has over 17 years of experience in managing and delivering software system, integration projects, implementation of OSS/BSS, applications and analytics in the telecom industry. Prior to joining Xalted, Mr. Nandwani was the Program Delivery Manager for Soma Networks, Project/Program Manager at Satyam Computers and worked in various capacities in software consulting firms in both the U.S. & India. He holds a Masters degree from Delhi University in Software Technology and an undergraduate degree in Systems Management from NIIT.

Hrisikesh Kulkami. Mr. Kulkami oversees the Technology Office Activities at Xalted Information Systems Pvt. Ltd. and has been involved with Xalted since 2003 in conception, development and implementation of Xalted products and solutions. Hrishi has been also involved in product and process innovation initiatives at Xalted. Prior to joining Xalted, Mr. Kulkami was the Senior Systems Engineer at Incoda Corporation and Software Elements India Pvt. Ltd. He holds a degree in Electronics Engineering from Mumbai University, Post Graduate Diplomas in Advanced Computing from CDAC, Embedded Systems from Department of Atomic Energy and certificates in Bio-Informatics from IIT Mumbai.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

39

---

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

• been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

• had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

• been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

• been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

• been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

• been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table — Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

The following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named persons for services rendered in all capacities during the noted periods. No other executive officer received total annual salary and bonus compensation in excess of $100,000.

				Stock	Option	All Other
	Fiscal	Salary	Bonus	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Total
Name and Principal Position	Year	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Ajay Batheja,	2010	39,000					39,000
Chief Executive Officer and President (1)	2009	39,000					39,000
Stephen K. Smith,	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
former President (2)	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-

(1)	On May 13, 2011, in connection with our acquisition of Xalted Networks, Mr. Ajay Batheja became our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior to the acquisition of Xalted Networks, Mr. Batheja held also held the position of Chief Executive Officer of Xalted Information, a position he continues to hold. The annual, long term and other compensation shown in this table include the amounts Mr. Batheja received from both companies.
(2)	Stephen K. Smith resigned from all offices he held with us upon the closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011.

40

---

Summary of Employment Agreements and Material Terms

All of our employees, including Mr. Ajay Batheja, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. B.T. Jamani, Chief Operating Officer – Xalted Information Systems, Mr. A.C. Narang, Vice President Government Strategy – Xalted Information Systems, B.N. Ramakrishnan, Vice President & Controller – Xalted Information Systems, and Ms. Kamini Rupani, our Vice President Marketing – Xalted Information Systems, have executed our standard employment agreement.

Other than the salary and necessary social benefits required by the government, which are defined in the employment agreement, we currently do not provide other benefits to our officers at this time.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

No unexercised options or warrants were held by any of our named executive officers at December 31, 2010. No equity awards were made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Compensation of Directors

No member of our board of directors received any compensation for his services as a director during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS,
AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions With Related Persons

We did not have any transactions since the beginning of the 2009 year, or any currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation”).

Xalted Information sold services, software and licenses to its parent company, Xalted Networks, in 2010 in a total amount of $2,154,535. Xalted Information also made loans and/or advances during 2010 to SEM India Systems (Pvt.) Ltd. in the amount of $627,529 and to KM Assets Management (Pvt.) Ltd. in the amount of $208,882, and sold certain assets and liabilities to SEM India Systems in the amount of $170,089, all entities over which directors of Xalted Information are able to exercise significant influence. As of December 31, 2010, Xalted Information had a receivable in the amount of $430,298 in respect of an interest-free loan made by Xalted Information to Pratap Kondamoori, a former director of Xalted Information and one of the nominee shareholders of Xalted Information

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

We did not have any promoters at any time during the past five fiscal years.

Director Independence

We currently do not have any independent directors, as the term “independent” is defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

On or about March 3, 2010, Arasor Corporation, a California corporation no longer in good standing, or Arasor, filed a petition in the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore (the relevant court of original jurisdiction in India) seeking the winding up of Xalted Information based on alleged breaches of contract and other claims. The petition was admitted by a Single Bench Judge of that Court. The lower court’s action was appealed by Xalted Information to a Two Bench Judge in the Karnataka High Court, which stayed the operation of the lower court’s order. A further hearing in the case is anticipated in May 2011. At that hearing, Xalted Information will seek the dismissal of all claims against it not only based on a substantive defense to the allegations made in Arasor’s petition, but as a threshold matter based on the fact that because Arasor is no longer in good standing in California, it no longer has legal authority to prosecute or defend any litigation.
 

41

---

We are currently not aware of any other legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON EQUITY
 AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “KRAN” on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, however there is not currently, nor has there ever been, an active trading market for our common stock, and no information is available for the prices of our common stock, as reported by www.quotemedia.com.

Holders

As of May 16, 2011 there were approximately 45 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include shares held by brokerage clearing houses, depositories or others in unregistered form.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid a cash dividend. Any future decisions regarding dividends will be made by our board of directors. We currently intend to retain and use any future earnings for the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have in effect any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance and we do not have any outstanding stock options.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

Reference is made to the disclosure set forth under Item 3.02 of this report, which disclosure is incorporated by reference into this section.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Capital Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote per share on all matters. Our bylaws provide that any vacancy occurring in the board of directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of the board of directors. Stockholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase shares in any future issuance of our common stock.

The holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to dividends out of funds legally available when and as declared by our board of directors. Our board of directors has never declared a dividend and does not anticipate declaring a dividend in the foreseeable future. Should we decide in the future to pay dividends, as a holding company, our ability to do so and meet other obligations depends upon the receipt of dividends or other payments from our operating subsidiary and other holdings and investments. In addition, our operating subsidiary, from time to time, may be subject to restrictions on its ability to make distributions to us, including as a result of restrictive covenants in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive, ratably, the net assets available to stockholders after payment of all creditors.

42

---

To the extent that additional shares of our common stock are issued, the relative interests of existing stockholders will be diluted.

We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value, in one or more classes or series within a class as may be determined by our board of directors, who may establish, from time to time, the number of shares to be included in each class or series, may fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such class or series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. Any preferred stock so issued by the board of directors may rank senior to the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us, or both. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or the existence of the unissued preferred stock might tend to discourage or render more difficult a merger or other change of control.

No shares of our preferred stock are currently outstanding. The issuance of additional shares preferred stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of our outstanding voting stock.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Our independent stock transfer agent is First American Stock Transfer, Inc. Their mailing address is 4747 North 7th Street, Suite 170, Phoenix, AZ 85014 and their phone number is (602) 485-1346.

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Our bylaws provide for the indemnification of our present and prior directors and officers or any person who may have served at our request as a director or officer of another corporation in which we own shares of capital stock or of which we are a creditor, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with the defense of any actions, suits or proceedings in which they, or any of them, are made parties, or a party, by reason of being or having been director(s) or officer(s) of us or of such other corporation, in the absence of negligence or misconduct in the performance of their duties. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditure by us, which we may be unable to recoup.

Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities arising under the Exchange Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification by such director, officer or controlling person of us in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being offered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

At the present time, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer, employee or other agent of ours in which indemnification would be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding, which may result in a claim for such indemnification.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Our independent registered public accounting firm is De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC, or De Joya Griffith. De Joya Griffith’s reports on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that its reports for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 contained a qualification as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

43

---

ITEM 3.02	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

On May 13, 2011, we issued 2,094,159 shares of our common stock to Imprenord ME, 598,331 shares of our common stock to Empire Capital Partners, L.P., and 299,166 shares of our common stock to Peter Richards to acquire from them convertible promissory notes issued by Xalted Holding, which we refer to as the Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000.

On May 13, 2011, we issued 2,326,844 shares of our common stock to Xalted Holding, the sole shareholder of Xalted Networks, and cancelled the Notes, in consideration for the acquisition of 100 shares of Xalted Networks, which is all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Xalted Networks

The number of our shares of our common stock issued to Xalted Holding , Imprenord ME, Empire Capital Partners, L.P. and Peter Richards was determined based on an arms-length negotiation. The issuance of these shares was made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering.

Our reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act was based upon the following factors: (a) the issuance of the securities was an isolated private transaction by us which did not involve a public offering; (b) there were only a limited number of offerees; (c) there were no subsequent or contemporaneous public offerings of the securities by us; (d) the securities were not broken down into smaller denominations; and (e) the negotiations for the sale of the shares took place directly between the offerees and us.

ITEM 5.01

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Reference is made to the disclosure set forth under Item 2.01 of this report, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

As a result of the closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks, Xalted Holding, the former shareholder of Xalted Networks, owns 35% , Imprenord ME owns 31.5%, Empire Capital Partners, L.P. owns 95, and Peter Richards owns 4.5%, of our total outstanding common stock total voting power of all our outstanding voting securities.

ITEM 5.02.

DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS

Upon the closing of our acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011, Michael Grove, our Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, submitted a resignation letter pursuant to which he resigned from all offices that he held effective immediately and Stephen K. Smith, our President and director, submitted a resignation letter pursuant to which he resigned from all offices that he held effective immediately and from his position as our director that will become effective on the tenth day following our mailing the Information Statement to our stockholders, which will be mailed on or about May 20, 2011. Such resignations were not in connection with any known disagreement with us on any matter.

On the same date, our board of directors increased its size from one to three members and appointed Mr. Luigi Caramico, Mr. Ajay Batheja and Mr. V.R. Ranganath, to fill the vacancies created by such increase and Mr. Smith’s resignation. Mr. Batheja’s appointment became effective upon the closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks on May 13, 2011, and the remaining appointments will become effective upon the tenth day following our mailing of the Information Statement to our stockholders.

In addition, our board of directors appointed Mr. Ajay Batheja as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Mr. Edward Miller as our Treasurer, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer, effective immediately at the closing of the acquisition of Xalted Networks.

For certain biographical and other information regarding the newly appointed officers and directors, see the disclosure under Item 2.01 of this report, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 5.06

CHANGE IN SHELL COMPANY STATUS

Reference is made to the disclosure set forth under Item 2.01 and 5.01 of this report, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

44

---

ITEM 9.01

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(a) Financial Statements of Business Acquired

Filed herewith are audited consolidated financial statements of Xalted Information for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

(b) Pro Forma Financial Information

Filed herewith is unaudited pro forma combined financial information of Kranem Corporation and its subsidiaries.

(d) Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description
2.1	Share Exchange Agreement, dated May 12, 2011, among the Company, Xalted Networks, Inc. and Xalted Holding Corporation
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Company [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on December 8, 2004]
3.2	Bylaws of the Company [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on December 8, 2004]
10.1	Assignment of Note Agreement, executed as of May 13, 2011, among the Company, Xalted Holding Corporation, Imprenord, ME, Empire Capital Partners, L.P., and Peter Richards
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Company

45
 

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 16, 2011

KRANEM CORPORATION

By: /s/ Ajay Batheja                                                  
Ajay Batheja
Chief Executive Officer

46

---

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Page
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Xalted Information Systems (PVT.) Ltd. for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009	F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income	F-4
Consolidated Statements Equity	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash flows	F-5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information	F-39

F-1

---

(on Letterhead of T R Chadha & Co)

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Xalted Information Systems Private Limited.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Xalted Information Systems Private Limited (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the related statements of operations, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

For and on behalf of
T R Chadha & Co
Chartered Accountants
(FRN. 006711N)

Vikas Kumar
Partner
M. No. 75363

Mumbai
April 15, 2011

F-2

---

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009
		Note			31-Dec-10			31-Dec-09
					US $			US $
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		1			545,374			397,987
Available for Sale Financial Assets		2			172,538			-
Financial Assets		3			455,856			1,353,199
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful debts		4			5,422,724			8,669,951
Accounts receivable - related parties		24			-			525,000
Inventories		5			145,023			2,231,823
Deferred tax assets, net		19			123,838			100,240
Current tax assets net of provision for income tax		6			463,021			437,541
Prepaid Expenses and Other current assets		7			176,712			3,856,301
Total Current Assets					7,505,086			17,572,042
Non-Current Assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net		8			1,001,511			1,047,041
Intangible assets, net		9			47,730			53,379
Financial assets		3			81,925			478,460
Deferred tax assets, net		19			3,202			-
Other non-current assets		10			173,071			421,819
Total Non-Current Assets					1,307,439			2,000,699
TOTAL ASSETS					8,812,525			19,572,741
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Currrent Liabilities:
Accounts payable		11			1,473,734			13,474,567
Accounts payable - related parties		24			1,078,831			925,403
Deferred Revenues					88,215			883,869
Current tax Liability, net of tax assets		12			156,451			47,172
Other Current liabilities		13			904,661			1,324,579
Total Current Liabilities					3,701,892			16,655,590
Non-Currrent Liabilities:
Long- term Provisions		14			92,862			64,981
Total non-current liabilities					92,862			64,981
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock- par value Rs 10/- ($ 0.22) per share (5,000,000 and 5,000,000 equity shares authorised and 2,205,000 and 2,205,000 equity shares issued as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively)		27			472,004			472,004
Retained Earnings					4,249,737			2,250,366
Currency Translation Reserve					281,015			117,082
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income					15,015			12,718
Total Stockholders' Equity					5,017,771			2,852,170
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S
EQUITY					8,812,525			19,572,741

The accompanying Accounting Policies and Notes are an integral part of the Financial Statements

For and on behalf of Board of Directors

	Pratap Kondamoori
	Chairman	/s/ Pratap Kondamoori
	Rajendra Manikonda
	Director	/s/ Rajendra Manikonda
Place : Mumbai	Ajay Batheja
Date : April 15, 2011	Director & CEO	/s/ Ajay Batheja

F-3
 

---

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited Statement of Income for the year ended on 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009
		Note			31-Dec-10			31-Dec-09
					US $			US $
REVENUES
Income from Operations					7,922,315			5,309,083
COST OF REVENUES		15			5,078,414			3,277,246
GROSS PROFIT					2,843,901			2,031,837
OPERATING EXPENSES
Selling and Marketing		16			418,451			509,287
General and Administrative Expenses		17			545,648			1,093,036
Total Operating Expenses					964,099			1,602,323
OPERATING INCOME					1,879,802			429,514
Finance Costs					(20,634	)		(75,255	)
Non Operating Income		18			416,378			439,459
Income before Income Taxes					2,275,546			793,718
Tax Expenses		19			276,175			(14,347	)
Net Income					1,999,371			808,065
Earnings per Equity share		20
Basic					0.91			0.37
Diluted					0.91			0.37
Weighted average number of equity shares used in computing earnings per equity share
Basic					2,205,000			2,205,000
Diluted					2,205,000			2,205,000

Xalted Information Systems Pvt. Ltd. Statement of Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended on 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009
		31-Dec-10			31-Dec-09
		US $			US $
Net Income		1,999,371			808,065
Actuarial Gains /(Losses) on Employee benefits, net of
income tax effects		2,297			12,718
Foreign Currency Translation Reserve		163,933			133,978
Total Comprehensive Income		2,165,600			954,761

The accompanying Accounting Policies and Notes are an integral part of the Financial Statements

For and on behalf of Board of Directors

	Pratap Kondamoori
	Chairman	/s/ Pratap Kondamoori
	Rajendra Manikonda
	Director	/s/ Rajendra Manikonda
Place : Mumbai	Ajay Batheja
Date : April 15, 2011	Director & CEO	/s/ Ajay Batheja

F-4
 

---

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended on 31 December 2010 and 31 December 2009
		31-Dec-10			31-Dec-09
		US $			US $
Cash flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income		1,999,371			808,065
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization		153,818			197,422
Deferred Taxes		(22,648	)		(108,180	)
Fair value of interest free Director's Loan		(48,894	)		(42,096	)
Changes in Asset / Liabilities
(Increase)/Decrease in Accounts Receivables		3,949,390			2,413,634
(Increase)/Decrease in Inventories		2,081,035			(2,002,551	)
(Increase)/Decrease in Current Tax Assets		(10,353	)		(416,988	)
(Increase)/Decrease in Prepaid and other current Assets		3,685,362			(1,180,555	)
(Increase)/Decrease in Other non-current assets		254,402			(157,738	)
Increase/(Decrease) in Accounts Payable		(11,930,799	)		882,786
Increase/(Decrease) in Deferred Revenues		(798,535	)		796,706
Increase/(Decrease) in Current Tax Liabilities		104,167			9,286
Increase/(Decrease) in Other Current Liabilities		(449,474	)		16,878
Increase/(Decrease) in Long term Provisions		27,144			(9,593	)
Net Cash from Operating Activities		(1,006,014	)		1,207,076
Cash flows from Investing Activities:
Investments in Fixed Deposits placed with Banks, net		1,360,342			(879,946	)
Investment in Mutual Fund Units, net		(166,901	)		-
Proceeds from Sale of Fixed Assets		2,008			53,760
Expenditure on property, plant and equipment		(58,656	)		(86,700	)
Net Cash from Investing Activities		1,136,793			(912,887	)
Cash flows from Financing Activities:
Net Cash from Financing Activities		-			-
Net Increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period		130,779			294,189
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		397,987			100,006
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		16,608			3,792
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the period		545,374			397,987

The accompanying Accounting Policies and Notes are an integral part of the Financial Statements

For and on behalf of Board of Directors

	Pratap Kondamoori
	Chairman	/s/ Pratap Kondamoori
	Rajendra Manikonda
	Director	/s/ Rajendra Manikonda
Place : Mumbai	Ajay Batheja
Date : April 15, 2011	Director & CEO	/s/ Ajay Batheja

F-5
 

---

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited
Statement of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income

														Amounts in $
		Common Stock Shares			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Currency Translation Reserve			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance as at 1 January 2009		472,004			-			(16,896	)		1,442,301			1,897,409
Net Income		-			-			-			808,065			808,065
Other Comprehensive Income
Actuarial Gains and Losses on Employee benefits		-			12,718			-			-			12,718
Translation Effect of exchange rate changes		-			-			133,978			-			133,978
Balance as at 31 December 2009		472,004			12,718			117,082			2,250,366			2,852,170
Net Income		-
					-						1,999,371			1,999,371
Other Comprehensive Income
Actuarial Gains and Losses on Employee benefits		-			2,297						-			2,297
Translation Effect of exchange rate changes		-			-			163,933			-			163,933
Balance as at 31 December 2010		472,004			15,015			281,015			4,249,737			5,017,771

The accompanying Accounting Policies and Notes are an integral part of the Financial Statements

For and on behalf of Board of Directors

	Pratap Kondamoori
	Chairman	/s/ Pratap Kondamoori
	Rajendra Manikonda
	Director	/s/ Rajendra Manikonda
Place : Mumbai	Ajay Batheja
Date : April 15, 2011	Director & CEO	/s/ Ajay Batheja

F-6
 

---

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited

Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements A. Description of business

Xalted Information Systems Private Limited (hereinafter refer to as “Xalted” or “the company”) was incorporated on September 12, 2001 in Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Xalted is the wholly owned subsidiary company of Xalted Networks Inc., a company based in United States of America (USA). Xalted is engaged in providing Operation Support Systems (OSS) /Business Support Systems (BSS), Telecom Security and managed services to Telecom Industry.

The Corporate office of Xalted is situated at 2^nd Floor, MGM Building, Charni Road, Mumbai, India. The Company has got development facilities situated at Bengaluru, Baddi (Himachal Pradesh) and Mumbai in India.

Xalted brings several National Security offerings to the Law Enforcement / Intelligence Agencies to empower them with proactive intelligence. The National Security product portfolio of Xalted consists of Interception and Monitoring, Knowledge Curation, Tactical Analysis and Strategic Modeling systems. These solutions assist Law Enforcement/ Intelligence Agencies in their investigation as well as decision making process while equipping them with Information Superiority.

The Company provides solutions for managing increasing network complexities and reducing costs for leading telcos and communication service providers worldwide. With scalable and integrated solutions provided by the Company, communication service providers can maximize revenues despite a competitive business environment. With Xalted’s solution offerings, legacy systems can co-exist with new generation systems and benefit from markedly reduced CAPEX without compromise on service quality standards

The Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares having par value of Rs. 10 each ($ 0.22/ -).

B. Summary of significant accounting policies

a)	Basis of preparation: The financial statements of Xalted are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States ("US GAAP"). The financial statements are presented in United States Dollars ($). The financial statements are prepared for the calendar year ended December 31, 2010 with comparatives for the previous calendar year (2009). The purpose of preparation of these financial statements is for submission to the parent company for consolidation purpose. It being the first time that the financial statements are prepared as per US GAAP, the balances of assets and liabilities as on January 1, 2009 have been reinstated to conform with the recognition and measurement principles of US GAAP.
b)	Use of estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as on the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Examples of such estimates include: project completion dates, time and cost required to complete projects for purposes of revenue recognition and future revenue, expense and cash flow estimates for purposes of impairment analysis and loss contract evaluation, allowance for doubtful debts, obligations under employee benefit plans, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, useful lives of premises and equipment (fixed assets) and income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

F-7

---

c)	Foreign Currency:
	Initial measurement: The transactions in foreign currency are recorded in functional currency at the exchange rates between foreign currency and functional currency prevailing as on the date of the transactions.
	Subsequent measurement: Foreign Currency monetary Assets and liabilities are translated into functional currency at year end exchange rates. Gains or losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded in the Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) within other income (expense), net.
	As the functional currency of the company is Indian Rupee (Rs), to present the financial statement in United States Dollars ($), the results and financial position are translated as follows:
		Assets and liabilities except equity and retained earnings are translated at the closing exchange rate at the date of the Balance Sheet.
		Income and expenditure for each income statement are translated at quarterly average exchange rate during each period.
		Equities are translated at the rate of date of acquisition. The retained earnings as at December 31, 2008 are translated at closing rate of December, 31, 2008 which is not expected to have any material variance.
	All resulting exchange differences are recognized as a component of equity.
d)	Revenue Recognition:
	Revenue from software services consist of revenues earned from services performed either on a time- and-material basis or under fixed price contracts. Revenues earned from services performed on a "time and material" basis are recognized as services are performed on the basis of billable time spent by employees working on the project, priced at the contracted rate. Revenue from Software development on fixed-price, where there is no uncertainty as to the measurement or collectability of consideration that will be derived on completion of the contract, is recognized as per the percentage of completion method as determined based on the certification of the Technical Head of the respective project. Revenue recognition using the percentage of-completion method in conformity with ASC Topic 605, is based on the guidance in ASC Topic 985, Software Revenue Recognition, to account for revenues under fixed price arrangements for software development and related services. Losses on such contracts are recognized when probable. Revenues in excess of billings are recognized as accrued income in the balance sheet; to the extent billings are in excess of revenues recognized, the excess is reported as deferred revenues in the balance sheet.
	In accordance with ASC Topic 605, "Income Statement Characterization of reimbursements received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred", Xalted accounts for reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenues in the Statement of Income.
	All revenues are recognized only when collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, and are reported net of discounts and indirect and service taxes.
	Deferred revenue includes payments that have been received and recorded prior to performance.

F -8

---

e)	Cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses: Cost of revenues primarily include the compensation cost of technical staff, consultancy charges, depreciation and amortization on dedicated assets and system software, application software costs, travel costs, data communication expenses and other attributable expenses incurred that are related to the generation of revenue. Selling, general and administrative expenses generally include the compensation costs of sales, management and administrative personnel, travel costs, advertising, professional charges, rent, repairs, electricity, office maintenance expenses and other general expenses not attributable to cost of revenues.
f)	Cash and cash equivalents: Xalted considers investments in highly liquid instruments that are purchased with remaining maturities, of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and claims to cash that are restricted as to withdrawal or use in the ordinary course of business is classified separately under other current and non-current assets.
g)	Fair value of financial instruments:
	Effective April 1, 2009, Xalted adopted SFAS No. 157 (ASC No 820) limited to financial assets and liabilities, which primarily relate to Xalted's investments. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable and consists of the following three levels:
	Level 1- Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	Level 2- Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
	Level 3- Inputs which are unobservable reflecting internal assumptions are used in pricing assets or liabilities.
h)	Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents the Company’s best estimate of receivables that are doubtful of recovery based on a specific identification basis. The Company currently has $ 2,728,869/- and $ 6,420,077/- of accounts receivable that has been outstanding for more than a year as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively, out of which $ 216,284/- and $ 216,284/- is covered by the allowance for doubtful accounts as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively.
i)	Inventories: Inventories are work in progress, which are valued based on the percentage of work completed / consumption. Cost includes cost of hardware/ software, related employees costs and overhead costs upto the date of financial statement.

F -9

---

j)	Premises, equipment and depreciation: Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:

		Estimated Useful Life
	Computer & Peripherals	3 to 5 years
	Communication Equipments	3 to 7 years
	Lab Equipment	5 to 10 years
	Office Equipment	5 years
	Motor Vehicle	6 years
	Air Conditioner	7 years
	Furniture and Fittings	10 years
	Digital Loop Carriers	3 years
	Leasehold improvements	Shorter of Lease period or estimated useful life

k)	Intangible Assets: Xalted amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful life on a straight- line basis unless such life is deemed indefinite. The intangible asset of the Company comprises of internal use softwares. Software product development costs are expensed as incurred unless technical and commercial feasibility of the project is demonstrated, future economic benefits are probable, we have the intention and ability to complete and use or sell the software and the costs can be measured reliably. The costs which can be capitalized include the cost of material, direct labour, overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Research and development costs and software development costs incurred under contractual arrangements with customers are accounted as cost of sales. During 2010 and 2009, software amounts capitalized on account of internal use were $ 20,104 and $1,613 respectively. Amortization of internal use software begins when the software is placed in use and continues on the straight-line method generally over a life of five years.
	Amortizable intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits consumed in each period. The estimated useful life of the Intangible assets is 5 years.
l)	Impairment of long-lived assets: Long-lived assets and assets group, including certain identifiable intangible assets, to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Such assets are considered to be impaired if the carrying amount of the assets is higher than the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the assets. The impairment amount to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair value. Assets held-for-sale is reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less costs to sell. However, based on the above exercise no adjustment on account of impairment is required.
m)	Investments: Xalted classifies investments in mutual funds with readily determinable fair market values as available-for-sale securities and is recorded at fair value. Accordingly, such securities are carried at fair value. Realized gains and losses and decline in value considered to be other-than- temporary are included in other income. The cost of securities sold is determined on the first-in-first- out (FIFO) method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in other income. The company does not have any securities classified as trading.

F -10

---

n)	Borrowing Cost: Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition of qualifying asset are capitalized, till the asset is put to use, as part of the cost of the asset. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
o)	Income taxes: Income tax expense comprises current tax expense and the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability during the year.
	(i) Current income taxes: The current income tax expense includes Indian income taxes payable for Xalted after taking credit for benefits available for operations in Software Technology Parks (or STPs) and export earnings, and after offsetting benefits under tax avoidance treaties for foreign taxes payable in overseas jurisdictions. Current income tax payable is computed in accordance with the tax laws applicable in India. The amounts paid are generally available for offset as tax credits in India towards the income tax liability.
	Payments of advance taxes and income taxes payable in the same tax jurisdictions are offset.
	(ii) Deferred income taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating loss carry forwards and tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period of change.
	Uncertain tax positions are recognized using the more likely-than-not threshold determined solely based on technical merits that the tax positions will sustain upon examination. Tax positions that meet the recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement with relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information.
p)	Earnings per share: In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share", basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income attributable to shareholders of Xalted by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
q)	Cash flow statement : The cash flow statement has been drawn up in accordance with the indirect method, classifying cash flows as cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. The effect of currency translation has been given to various items of cash flow statement. The difference between the net cash flow and the change in Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet due to exchange rate differences are disclosed separately as part of the reconciliation of the net cash flow and the balance sheet change in Cash and cash equivalents.
r)	Employment benefits:
	(i) Provident fund: In accordance with Indian law, all employees are entitled to receive benefits under the Provident Fund, which is a defined contribution plan. Both the employee and the employer make monthly contributions to the plan at a predetermined rate (presently 12%) of the employees' basic salary. Xalted has no further obligations under the plan beyond its monthly contributions. These contributions are made to fund administered and managed by the Government of India. Xalted's monthly contributions are charged to income in the period it is incurred.

F -11

---

	(ii) Employees state insurance fund: In addition to the above benefit, all employees in India who are drawing gross salary of less than Rs. 15,000 per month are entitled to receive benefit under employee state insurance fund scheme. The employer makes contribution to the scheme at a predetermined rate (presently 4.75%) of employee's gross salary. Xalted has no further obligations under the scheme beyond its monthly contributions. These contributions are made to fund administered and managed by the Government of India. Xalted’s monthly contributions are charged to income in the year it is incurred.
	(iii) Gratuity plan: In addition to the above benefits, Xalted provides for a gratuity obligation, a defined benefit retirement plan (the "Gratuity Plan") covering all its employees in India. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or termination of employment based on the respective employee's salary, and the years of employment with Xalted. Xalted provides for the Gratuity Plan on the basis of actuarial valuation. Xalted makes yearly contributions under the gratuity plan administered and managed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India ('LIC'). Gratuity payable is recognized in the Balance Sheet. Gratuity payable is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets with LIC and the projected benefit obligation at December 31, the measurement date. (Gains)/losses arise as a result of differences between actual experience and assumptions or as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions. These are recognized as and when they arise. Net periodic gratuity cost is recorded in the Statement of Income and includes service cost, interest cost, and return on plan assets. Actuarial gains/losses are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income statement.
	(iv) Leave Encashment: The Company has other long term employee benefits in the nature of leave encashment (Compensated Absences). The liability in respect of leave encashment is provided for on the basis of actuarial valuation made at end of the calendar year, as the said schemes meet the requirement of relevant ASC.
s)	Dividends:
	Final dividend on the common stock is recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the stockholders. Interim dividends are recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the board of directors.
t)	Warranty Costs: The Company provides for the estimated costs of fulfilling their obligations for contracts under warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. The Company regularly evaluates the estimates to assess the adequacy of the recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amount as necessary.
u)	Recently announced accounting pronouncements:
	In April 2010, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a final consensus on milestone method of revenue recognition and published ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (ASC Topic 605). The scope of this ASU is limited to arrangements that include milestones relating to research or development deliverables. The consensus specifies guidance that must be met for a vendor to recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. The guidance applies to milestones in arrangements within the scope of this consensus regardless of whether the arrangement is determined to have single or multiple deliverables or units of accounting. The final consensus will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. Companies can apply this guidance prospectively to milestones achieved after adoption. However, retrospective application to all prior periods is also permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2010-17 in fiscal year 2011 and its effect on future periods is presently being evaluated by the Company.

F -12

---

In October 2009, the FASB published FASB ASU 2009-14, Software (ASC Topic 985) - Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements. ASU 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under this guidance, tangible Products containing software components and non software components that function together to deliver the tangible product's essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in ASC Subtopic 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the software revenue guidance. The amendments also provide additional guidance on how to determine which software, if any, relating to the tangible products would be excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. These amendments significantly expand the disclosure requirements of multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009-14 are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a company elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the company's fiscal year, the company is required to apply the amendments in this Update retrospectively from the beginning of that fiscal year. Additionally, a company is required to adopt the amendments in this Update in the same period and using the same transition methods used to adopt ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) - Multiple- Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. The Company will adopt ASU 2009-14 in fiscal year 2011 and its effect on future periods is presently being evaluated by the Company.

In October 2009, the FASB published FASB ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (ASC Topic 605) -Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance amends the criteria in ASC Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements, for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence if available; (b) third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective is not available; or (c) estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009- 13 are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted.

The adoptions of following ASUs are not expected to have any impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Update No. 2011-01—Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20. This update delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will be coordinated. That guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after 15 June 2011 which would otherwise been applicable from 15 December 2010.

F -13

---

Update No. 2010-29—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The Update specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combinations that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments in this update also expand the supplemental proforma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non-recurring proforma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported proforma revenue and earnings. The amendments in the Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after 15 December 2010. Early adoption is permitted. As there is no business combination transaction, the update is not applicable to the company.

Update No. 2010-28—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The amendments in this Update affect entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. As the company has no such recognized goodwill, this Update is not applicable.

Update No. 2010-27—Other Expenses (Topic 720): Fees Paid to the Federal Government by Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The objective of this update is to address questions concerning how pharmaceutical manufacturers should recognize and classify in their income statement fees mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. The amendments in this Update affect reporting entities that are subject to the pharmaceutical fee mandated by the Acts. As the company is not in pharmaceutical industry, this update has no effect on the company’s financial position.

Update No. 2010-26—Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this update affect insurance entities that are within the scope of Topic 944 – Financial Services – Insurance that incur costs in the acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts. As the company is not in insurance sector, this update has no effect on its financial position.

Update No. 2010-25—Plan Accounting—Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962): Reporting Loans to Participants by Defined Contribution Pension Plans (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The objective of the amendments in this update is to clarify how loans to participants should be classified and measured by defined contribution plans. As the company does not administer any defined contribution pension plans, the amendments in this update do not have any effect on its financial position.

Update No. 2010-24—Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this update affect health care entities within the scope of FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM Topic 954, Health Care Entities. As the company does not fall within the scope of Topic 954, The amendments in this update do not have any effect on its financial position.

F -14

---

Update No. 2010-23—Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Measuring Charity Care for Disclosure—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The amendments in this update affect any health care entity that provides charity care. As the company does not fall within the scope of Topic 954, the amendments in this update do not have any effect on its financial position.

Update No. 2010-22—Accounting for Various Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs (SEC Update). This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs. As all applicable SEC guidances have been taken care of, this update has no effect on the company’s financial position.

Update No. 2010-21—Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies (SEC Update). This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs. As all applicable SEC guidances have been taken care of, this update has no effect on the company’s financial position.

Update No. 2010-20—Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The amendments in this update require an entity to provide following additional disclosures about its financing receivables:

	1.	Credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables
	2.	The aging of past due financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables
	3.	The nature and extent of troubled debt restructuring that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and their effect on the allowance for credit losses
	4.	The nature and extent of financing receivables modified as trouble debt restructurings within the previous 12 months that defaulted during the reporting period by class of financing receivables and their effect on the allowance for credit losses.
	5.	Significant purchases and sales of financing receivables during the reporting period disaggregated by portfolio segment.

The update defines a financing receivable as a financing arrangement that has both the following characteristics:

	1.	It represents a contractual right to receive money in either of the following ways:
		a.	On demand
		b.	On fixed or determinable dates
	2.	It is recognized as an asset in the entity’s statement of financial position.

As the company is a commercial entity into software sector, this update does not have any material effect on its financial position.

Update No. 2010-19—Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates (SEC Update). The purpose of this update is to codify the SEC Staff Announcement on certain foreign currency issues related to investments in Venezuela. As the company does not have any investments in Venezuela, the amendments in this update do not have any significant effect on the entity’s financial position.

Update No. 2010-18—Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The update addresses the diversity in practice regarding modifications of acquired loans that fall under the scope of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM Subtopic 310-30, Receivables

F -15

---

	– Loans and Debt securities acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. As the subtopic does not apply to the company, the amendments in this update do not have any effect on its financial position.
	Update No. 2010-16, Entertainment – Casinos (Topic 924) Accruals for Casino Jackpot Liabilities – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The amendments in this update affect entities that generate revenues from gaming activities that involve base jackpots and hence does not have any effect on the company’s financial position.
	Update 2010-15, Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944) – How Investments Held through Separate Accounts Affect an Insurer’s Consolidation Analysis of Those Investments – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The amendment in the update affect insurance entities and hence does not have any effect on the company’s financial position.
	Update 2010-14, Accounting for Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas – Amendments to Paragraph 932-10-S99-1 – an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM. The amendments in this update relate to entities in Oil and Gas Sector and hence does not have any effect on the company’s financial position
	Update No. 2010-13, Compensation - Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718); Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share- Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. The amendments in this update affect entities that issue employee share-based payment awards with an exercise price denominated in a currency of a market in which substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades that differs from the functional currency of the employer entity or payroll currency of the employee. As the company has not issue any such share-based payment awards, the amendments in this update do not have any effect on its financial position.
	Update 2010-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Accounting for certain tax effects of the 2010 Health Reform Acts – an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM. This update adds paragraph 740-10-S99-4 being the SEC staff announcement on Accounting for the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Since the company is not in health care sector, this update has no relevance to the financial position of the company.
	Update No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815) – Scope Exception related to Embedded Credit Derivatives to clarify the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. The amendments in this update affect entities that enter into contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is not only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another. As the company has not entered into any such contract nor does it have any plans to enter into such contracts in the foreseeable future, the amendments in this update do not have any effect on the financial position of the company.
v)	Recently adopted accounting pronouncements:
	In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" (the "Codification"). The Codification does not alter current U.S. GAAP, but rather integrates existing accounting standards with other authoritative guidance. Under the Codification, there is a single source of authoritative US GAAP for non governmental entities and it supersedes all other previously issued non-SEC accounting and reporting guidance. The Codifications effective for financial statement periods ending after September 15, 2009. Our adoption of the Codification did not have a material effect on our financial condition.

F -16

---

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 855-10 "Subsequent events", which is effective for interim and Annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The guidance is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations r cash flows. See note 29 for further details.

In December 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 132(R)-1, Disclosures about Employers' Plan Assets. Through this FSP, amendments were made in Statement 132 (R) (ASC Topic 715), “Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.” The FSP enhances the disclosures required about employers' plan assets, including employers' investment strategies, major categories of plan assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets, and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets. This FSP is effective on December 30, 2008. An entity must provide the FSP's disclosures in financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Because the guidance applies only to financial statement disclosures, the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On 30 September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, “Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share.” ASU 2009-12 amends ASC 820 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) by providing additional guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. Under the amended guidance, entities are permitted, as a practical expedient, to estimate the fair value of investments within its scope using the net asset value (NAV) per share of the investment as of the reporting entities measurement dates. The amended guidance applies only to investments in entities that calculate NAV consistent with the measurement principles of ASC 946 (i.e., entities that measure investment assets at fair value on a recurring basis). Our adoption of the ASU did not have a material effect on our financial condition or consolidated results of operations.

F -17

---

C. Notes to Financial Statements

1.	Cash and Cash Equivalent
	Cash and Cash Equivalent consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Cash in Hand		4,775			12,791
	Cash at Bank		540,599			385,196
	Cash and Cash Equivalents		545,374			397,987

2.	Available for Sale Financial Assets:
	Investment in Mutual Fund units is classified as available for sale financial assets for which details are as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Cost		167,373			-
	Cost of Dividend Reinvested		5,165			-
	Total Cost		172,538			-
	Fair Value		172,538			-

3.	Financial Assets:
	The components of financial assets are given hereunder:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	1. Financial Assets-Current
	Interest free Loan given to Director (Note a)		430,298			-
	Fixed Deposits placed with Banks with residual maturity less than one year (Note b)		25,558			1,353,199
			455,856			1,353,199
	2. Financial Assets-Non-Current
	Interest free Loan given to Director (Note a)		-			381,404
	Fixed Deposits placed with Banks with residual maturity more than one year (Note c)		81,925			97,056
			81,925			478,460
	Total Financial Assets		537,781			1,831,659

Note a: The Company has given Interest free loan to a Director, which is repayable in 2011. The Board of Directors of the Company has decided that no further loan will be granted to any of the Directors of the Company in the future.

F -18

---

	Note b: Current Fixed Deposits amounting to $ 25,558/- as on December 31, 2010 and $78,530 as on December 31, 2009 are placed with Bank as margin for performance /financial guarantees given by the company, as such not considered as cash equivalents.
	Note c: Entire amounts of Non-current Fixed Deposits as on December 31, 2010 and as on December 31, 2009 are placed with Bank as margin for performance/ financial guarantees given by the company
4.	Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful debts
	Accounts Receivables consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Accounts Receivables
	-From customer		3,900,248			7,343,884
	-From Related Parties		-			525,000
	Accrued Income (Refer Note a)		1,738,760			1,542,351
	Total Accounts Receivables (Gross)		5,639,008			9,411,235
	Less: Allowance for Doubtful Debts (Refer Note b)		(216,284	)		(216,284	)
	Accounts Receivable, Net		5,422,724			9,194,951

Note a: Accrued Income consists of amounts representing the recognized sales value of performance and such amounts that had not been billed and were not billable to customers at the date of the balance sheet.

Note b: The Company had billed a customer in Africa amounting to $ 216,284. In view of the uncertainty in realization of this amount from the Customer, the Company as a prudent and conservative measure, had made a Provision in the books for the entire amount

Xalted is exposed to foreign currency risk on its Account Receivables. Foreign currency risk is market risk due to effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The contracts with some clients are typically priced in U.S. dollars which represents foreign exchange exposure. Net Foreign currency receivable aggregated to $ 8,750/- and $ 551,576/- as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively.

Bad debts written off aggregated to $ Nil and $ 375,594/- for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively.

The allowance for doubtful debts are established at amounts considered to be appropriate based primarily upon Xalted's past credit loss experience with the customers and an evaluation of potential losses on the outstanding receivable balances.

F -19

---

The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is given below:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	At the beginning of the year		216,284			-
	Additions		-			216,284
	Deductions		-			-
	At the end of the year		216,284			216,284

5.	Inventories
	Inventories consists Work in Progress of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Major classes of Inventories:
	-Inventories cost relating to long term contracts in progress		145,023			2,231,823

6.	Current Tax Assets (net of provision for income tax)
	Current Tax Assets (net of provision for income tax) consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Tax Deducted at Source Receivable		838,845			664,090
	Less: Provision for Income Tax		(375,824	)		(226,549	)
	Current Tax Assets net of provision for income tax		463,021			437,541

7.	Prepaid Expenses and Other current Assets
	Prepaid Expenses and Other current Assets consist of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Prepaid Expenses		8,020			60
	Advances
	- to related parties		19,296			1,861,825
	- to employees		55,001			33,410
	Advance paid to Vendors		80,911			1,947,614
	Statutory Taxes Receivable		13,484			13,392
	Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets		176,712			3,856,301

F -20

---

8.	Property, plant and equipment, net
	Property, plant and equipment consist of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Computer & Peripherals		1,113,637			1,049,173
	Communication Equipments		31,102			29,856
	Electrical Equipments		137,752			132,235
	Lab Equipment		78,388			75,248
	Office Equipment		9,901			8,948
	Motor Vehicle		63,730			73,313
	Air Conditioner		76,712			73,639
	Furniture and Fittings		95,652			91,820
	Digital Loop Carriers		73,849			70,890
	Land (Refer Note 27 below)		803,412			771,227
	Leasehold improvements		33,909			25,698
	Total		2,518,044			2,402,047
	Less: Accumulated Depreciation		(1,516,533	)		(1,355,006	)
	Property, plant and equipment, net.		1,001,511			1,047,041

	Net Depreciation expense aggregated to $107,678 /- and $ 152,583/- for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
9.	Intangible Assets, net
	The following table presents details of Xalted's total other intangible assets:

 

			As of December 31, 2010
						Accumulated			Net carrying
			Gross Cost			amortization			value
			$			$			$
	Software		304,612			256,882			47,730
	Total		304,612			256,882			47,730

 

			As of December 31, 2009
						Accumulated			Net carrying
			Gross Cost			amortization			value
			$			$			$
	Software		273,111			219,732			53,379
	Total		273,111			219,732			53,379

Amortization of intangible assets aggregated to $ 46,140/- and $ 44,839/- for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively.

F -21

---

The weighted average amortization period for intangibles in total is 5 years.

The estimated amortization for each of the 5 fiscal years subsequent to December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	Year ending December 31,	Amortization
		Expense ($)
	2011	17,986
	2012	15,163
	2013	10,199
	2014	4,084
	2015	298

10.	Other Non-Current Assets
	Other (non-Current Assets) consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Security Deposits with service providers		38,307			35,333
	Rental Deposits		112,056			354,702
	Prepaid Rent		22,708			31,784
	Other Non-Current Assets		173,071			421,819

	Security deposits relate principally to leased telephone lines and electricity supplies and other deposits with Tax Authorities in respect of appeal filed to Tax authorities against the demand of additional tax. Rental deposits are mainly pertaining to deposits towards Rental Agreements entered with various owners for premises taken on rent basis; the risk element is relatively low, since there is a separate clause for repayment/adjustment of these deposits
11.	Accounts Payable
	Trade Accounts payable consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Trade Accounts payable
	-To Vendors		1,473,734			13,474,567
	-To Related Parties		1,078,831			925,403
	Total		2,552,565			14,399,970

F -22

---

12.	Current tax Liability, net of tax assets
	Current tax Liability consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Provision for Taxation		342,783			171,231
	Less : Tax deducted at source		186,332			124,059
	Net Current Tax Liability		156,451			47,172

13.	Other Current Liabilities
	Other Current Liabilities consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Amount payable to employees		79,175			127,731
	Accrued Expenses		183,362			121,750
	Statutory Payments (Net)		139,458			135,101
	Advance received from Related Parties		502,666			939,997
	Other Current Liabilities		904,661			1,324,579

14.	Long Term Provisions
	Long Term Provisions consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Liability Accrual for Gratuity		51,110			39,680
	Liability Accrual for Leave Encashment
	(Compensated Absences)		32,714			25,301
	Provision for Warranty Expenses		9,038			-
	Total		92,862			64,981

15.	Major expenses included in Cost of Revenues head for the year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively are as follows:

	Year ended December 31, 2010		Cost of Revenues
			$			%
	Cost of Hardware/software		2,562,456			50%
	Staff Cost		1,517,163			30%
	Travelling Expenses		270,506			5%
	Rent Expenses		214,087			4%

F -23

---

	Year ended December 31, 2009		Cost of Revenues
			$			%
	Cost of Hardware/software		1,164,193			36%
	Staff Cost		1,162,352			35%
	Rent Expenses		246,440			8%
	Travelling Expenses		206,345			6%

16.	Major expenses included in Selling & Marketing expenses head for the year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively are as follows:

			Selling and Marketing
	Year ended December 31, 2010		Expenses
			$			%
	Staff Cost		232,331			56%
	Consultancy		80,650			19%
	Travelling Expenses		33,183			8%
	Sales Commission		7,903			2%
			Selling and Marketing
	Year ended December 31, 2009		Expenses
			$			%
	Staff Cost		263,710			52%
	Consultancy		82,983			17%
	Travelling Expenses		66,895			13%
	Sales Commission		17,810			4%

17.	Major Expenses included in General and Administration expenses head for the year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively are as follows

			General and Administrative
	Year ended December 31, 2010		Expenses
			$			%
	Staff Cost		214,780			39%
	Professional Charges		96,814			18%
	Consultancy		74,698			14%
	Travelling Expenses		27,320			5.%

F -24

---

			General and Administrative
	Year ended December 31, 2009		Expenses
			$			%
	Provision for Bad & Doubtful Debts and Bad debts written off		589,179			53%
	Staff Cost		192,014			18%
	Professional Charges		79,773			7%
	Consultancy		74,610			7%

18.	Non Operating income
	Other income consists of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Profit on sale of Fixed Assets		2,110			50,107
	Dividend income on Mutual Fund Investments		8,366			-
	Foreign Currency Gains (net)		236,187			251,108
	Interest Received on Fixed Deposits		11,674			33,923
	Interest Income		40,656			95,893
	Miscellaneous Balances Written back		117,267			7,777
	Others		118			651
	Total		416,378			439,459

Income taxes

Income taxes consist of:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Domestic Income Taxes
	Current		262,334			100,198
	Earlier Years		37,111			-
	Deferred		(23,270	)		(114,545	)
	Aggregate Income taxes		276,175			(14,347	)

Under Section 10A of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Xalted is entitled to tax holidays for its Software Technology Park unit located at Bengaluru. 100% tax holidays of profits are available for a period of first five consecutive fiscal years from the date of commencement of operations and 50% exemption of profits for the next five consecutive fiscal years respectively. These holidays expire in fiscal 2011.

Also, under Section 80-IC on the Income Tax Act, 1961, Xalted is entitled to tax holidays for its Software units located at Himachal Pradesh. 100% tax holidays of profits are available for a period of first five consecutive fiscal years from the date of commencement of operations and 30% exemption of profits for the next five consecutive fiscal years respectively. These holidays expire in fiscal 2015 for the first unit and fiscal 2019 for the second unit.

F -25

---

The reconciliation of estimated income tax expense at Indian statutory income tax rate to income tax expense reported in statement of income is as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Income before income taxes		2,275,546			793,718
	Indian statutory income tax rate		33.2175%			33.99%
	Expected income tax expense		755,879			269,785
	Adjustments to reconcile expected income tax expense to
	reported income tax expense:
	Tax effect of temporary differences:
	Deferred Taxes-
	on Fair value on assets and liabilities		14,289			23,413
	on Property, Plant and Equipment		(22,128	)		(39,999	)
	on Salaries Payable		10,592			(23,854	)
	on Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts		4,664			(70,658	)
	on Others (net)		(30,687	)		(3,447	)
	Tax effect of permanent differences:
	Tax holidays and income exempt from tax		(41,685	)		-
	Income taxed at different rates on account of MAT provisions		(460,506	)		(151,186	)
	Others (net)		9,233			(18,401	)
	Earlier Year Taxes		36,524			-
	Total taxes recognized in the statement of income		276,175			(14,347	)

Under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Xalted is liable to pay Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT). The excess tax paid as per MAT over and above the regular tax liability can be carried forward for a period of 10 years and can be set off against the future tax liabilities computed under regular tax provisions. Consequently, Xalted has recognized a deferred tax asset of $18,500/- on the same as of December 31, 2010.

The aggregate dollar and per share (basic) effects of tax exemptions are $ 42,355/- and $ 0.02 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $ Nil and $ Nil, since Xalted was liable to pay MAT under the Income tax laws for the year ended December 31, 2009.

In assessing the realizibility of deferred tax assets, Xalted considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible or utilizable. Xalted considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, Xalted believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of these deductible differences as on December 31, 2010. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are reduced.

F-26

---

The components of net deferred tax asset are as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Deferred tax assets:
	Employee benefits
	Gratuity		10,867			8,600
	Leave Encashment		16,977			13,487
	Fair Value of Director Loan		11,863			22,413
	Provision for Doubtful Accounts		71,844			73,515
	MAT credit available as per Income Tax Act, 1961		18,500			-
	Accrued Liabilities		22,058			28,113
	Others		9,589			12,117
	Gross deferred tax assets		161,698			158,245
	Less: Valuation allowance		-			-
	Total deferred tax assets		161,698			158,245
	Deferred tax liabilities:
	Property, plant and equipment		26,688			47,202
	Prepaid Rent		7,970			10,803
	Total deferred tax liabilities		34,658			58,005
	Net deferred income tax assets/(liabilities)		127,040			100,240

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48") (ASC Topic 740). The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 (ASC Topic 740) is effective from fiscal year beginning on April 1, 2007. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, (ASC Topic 740) Xalted did not have to recognize any increase/decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior periods.

Xalted has ongoing disputes with Indian Income tax authorities relating to tax treatment of certain items. These mainly include disallowed expenses, tax treatment of certain expenses claimed by Xalted as deductions, and computation of, or eligibility of certain tax incentives or allowances. Xalted is contesting the Income Tax Officer's order for the denial of section 10A benefits claimed by the Company under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The estimated contingency amounts to $ 224,949 as of December 31, 2010 and $ 141,592 as on December 31, 2009. The management believes that it has strong merits for this petition and hence it will not have the material adverse affect on Xalted's results of operations, liquidity or financial position.

The Company’s tax assessment is open for financial year 2008-2009 and 2009-10 for which the income tax authorities can review / audit Company's income tax filings.

F-27

---

19.	Earnings per share
	Basic earnings per share and Diluted earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Net income attributable to Xalted Information
	Systems Private Limited’s shareholders		1,999,371			808,065
	Average outstanding shares
	Basic		2,205,000			2,205,000
	Diluted		2,205,000			2,205,000
	Earnings per share
	Basic		0.91			0.37
	Diluted		0.91			0.37

20.	Financial instruments

Fair value of financial instruments:

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, investments in bank deposits, investments in mutual funds, accounts receivables, loans to others and other non-current assets, deposits, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to their short maturity.

The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with SFAS No. 157 as of December 31, 2010:

			Level-1			Level-2			Level-3
			$			$			$
	Assets and liabilities measured at fair values
	Investment in Mutual Funds		172,538			-			-
	Rent Deposits (Refer Note a)		-			-			112,057
	Interest Free Loan to Director (Refer Note a)		-			-			430,298

Note a: Discounting rate used is based on fixed deposit interest rate offered by Bankers of the Company.

F-28

---

The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with SFAS No. 157 as of December 31, 2009:

			Level-1			Level-2			Level-3
			$			$			$
	Assets and liabilities measured at fair values
	Rent Deposits (Refer Note a)		-			-			354,703
	Interest Free Loan to Director (Refer Note a)		-			-			381,404

Note a: Discounting rate used is based on fixed deposit interest rate offered by Bankers of the Company.

Disclosure for fair value measurement of Investment in Mutual Funds as required by ASU 2009-12.

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Liquid Mutual funds –Debt Based		172,538			-

The above category includes investments in debt funds that invest mainly into Debt instruments and Money Market Instruments and other form of liquid investments and dividend is being received and reinvested on daily basis. The fair values of the investments in this category have been estimated using the net asset value per share of the investments.

The Company has not entered into any type of derivative contracts as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

21.	Employee Benefits

The Gratuity Plan

The following table sets forth the funded status of the gratuity plan of Xalted Information Systems Private Limited, and the amounts recognized in the balance sheet.

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Accumulated benefit obligation		39,578			32,701
	Change in projected benefit obligation
	Projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year		82,502			72,731
	Service Cost		26,107			24,263
	Interest Cost		6,358			5,576
	Actuarial loss/(gain)		(7,331	)		(10,684	)
	Benefits paid		(13,630	)		(12,689	)
	Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year Plan asset at fair value		94,006			79,197

F-29

---

			2010			2009
	Plan assets at the beginning of the year		56,145			33,139
	Actual return on plan assets		3,572			(61	)
	Employer contribution		15,203			33,507
	Benefits paid		(13,630	)		(12689	)
	Plan asset at fair value at the end of the year		61,292			53,896
	Funded status of the plan		(32,714	)		(25,301	)
	Accrued benefit cost		(32,714	)		(25,301	)
	The components of net gratuity cost are reflected below:
	Service cost		26,107			24,263
	Interest cost		6,358			5,576
	Expected return on plan assets		(5,124	)		(3,920	)
	Amortization of transition obligation		-			-
	Gratuity Cost recognized in Statement of Income		27,341			25,919
	Actuarial loss/(gain) recognized in Other
	Comprehensive Income		(5,781	)		(6,703	)
	Net gratuity cost		21,560			19,216
	Weighted average assumptions used to determine net gratuity cost and benefit obligations:
	Discount rate		8.40% p.a.			8.40% p.a.
	Long-term rate of compensation increase		7.00% p.a.			7.00% p.a.
	Rate of return on plan assets		9.00% p.a.			9.00% p.a.

The company assesses these assumptions with its projected long term plans of growth and prevalent industry standards. The company estimates the long-term return on plan assets based on the average rate of return expected to prevail over the next 15 to 20 years in the types of investments held. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the entire plan assets were invested with Gratuity plan funds managed by LIC.

Accumulated benefit obligation was $ 39,578/- and $32,701/- as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively.

Leave Encashment

The following table sets forth the funded status of the leave liability of Xalted, and the amounts recognized in the balance sheet.

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Accumulated benefit obligation		22,336			17,145
	Change in projected benefit obligation
	Projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year		41,336			47,843
	Service Cost		14,819			14,172
	Interest Cost		3,030			3,438
	Actuarial loss/(gain)		2,461			(11,935	)

F-30

---

			2010			2009
	Benefits paid		(10,536	)		(13,838	)
	Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year		51,109			39,680
	Plan asset at fair value
	Plan assets at the beginning of the year		-			-
	Actual return on plan assets		-			-
	Employer contribution		10,536			13,838
	Benefits paid		(10,536	)		(13,838	)
	Plan asset at fair value at the end of the year		-			-
	Funded status of the plan		(51,109	)		(39,680	)
	Accrued benefit cost		(51,109	)		(39,680	)
	The components of leave encashment cost are reflected below:
	Service cost		14,819			14,172
	Interest cost		3,030			3,438
	Expected return on plan assets		-			-
	Amortization of transition obligation		-			-
	Leave Encashment cost recognized in Statement of Income		17,849			17,610
	Actuarial loss/(gain) recognized in Other
	Comprehensive Income		2,461			(11,935	)
	Net leave encashment cost		20,309			5,675
	Weighted average assumptions used to determine net gratuity cost and benefit obligations:
	Discount rate		8.40% p.a.			8.40% p.a.
	Long-term rate of compensation increase		7.00% p.a.			7.00% p.a.

The contributions made to various employee benefit contribution funds are as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	Provident fund		100,621			88,270
	Employee State Insurance (ESI) scheme		2,414			584
	Total		103,035			88,854

22.	Segmental reporting
	SFAS 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about business segments and related disclosures about products and services, geographical areas and major customers.
	The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) as defined by ASC Topic 280. The CEO of the Company evaluates the segments based on their revenue growth, operating income and return on capital employed. Management of the Company is of the view that Xalted has only one business vertical, i.e. Telecom Industry and hence the disclosure requirements as per SFAS 131 are not applicable to the Company.

F-31

---

Geographic segment

The revenues that are attributable to countries based on location of customers are as follows:

			2010			2009
			$			$
	India		5,361,525			3,992,740
	USA		2,260,010			696,470
	Nepal		176,405			249,459
	South Africa		124,375			343,678
	Singapore		-			26,736
	Total		7,922,315			5,309,083

23.	Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject Xalted to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and unbilled revenues. Accounts receivable balances are typically unsecured and are derived from revenues earned from customers primarily located in India, United States of America and Nepal. The company monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to which it grants credit terms in the normal course of business

The following table gives details in respect of percentage of revenues generated from top five and top ten customers:

	Year ended December 31, 2010
			Percentage
	Revenues generated from top Five customers
	Customer I- India		32%
	Customer II- India		30%
	Customer III- United States of America		27%
	Customer IV- India		4%
	Customer V- South Africa		2%
	Total revenues from top ten customers		99%
	Year ended December 31, 2009
			Percentage
	Revenues generated from top five customers
	Customer I- India		47%
	Customer II- India		16%
	Customer III- United States of America		11%
	Customer IV- India		7%
	Customer V- South Africa		4%
	Total revenues from top ten customers		97%

F-32

---

Xalted has a customer concentration of risk, as illustrated in the table below showing the aggregated accounts receivable and unbilled revenues for five largest customers as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

			Year ended December 31, 2010
			Total accounts
			receivable and			Percentage
			Accrued Income
	Customer A		2,388,976			44%
	Customer B		1,592,132			29%
	Customer C		1,052,790			19%
	Customer D		202,183			4%
	Customer E		83,980			2%
	Others		102,663			2%
	Total		5,422,724			100%
			Year ended December 31, 2009
			Total accounts
			receivable and			Percentage
			Accrued Income
	Customer F		4,225,606			46%
	Customer G		2,017,293			22%
	Customer B		1,528,351			17%
	Customer H		525,000			6%
	Customer D		307,455			3%
	Others		591,246			6%
	Total		9,194,951			100%

Xalted also has a geographical concentration of credit risk relating to cash and equivalent held with banks in India comprising 100% of the balances as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

F-33

---

24.	Related Party Transactions
	List of related parties where control exists and related parties with whom transactions have taken place and relationships:

	Sr
	No.	Name of the Related Party	Relationship
	1	Xalted Networks Inc	Holding Company
	2	KM Assets Management Private Limited	Entities over which Directors are able to exercise significant influence
	3	Sandalwood Consulting Private Limited	Entities over which Directors are able to exercise significant influence
	4	Sandalwood Partners	Entities over which Directors are able to exercise significant influence
	5	SEM India Systems Private Limited	Entities over which Directors are able to exercise significant influence
	6	Xalted Technologies Private Limited	Entities over which Directors are able to exercise significant influence
	7	Shri Pratap Kondamoori	Key Managerial Personnel
	8	Shri Ajay Batheja	Key Managerial Personnel

Transactions during the year with related parties

				Year ended December 31, 2010
	Sr	Nature of	Holding	Entities over	Key	Total
	No	Transactions	Company	which Directors	Managerial
				are able to	Personnel
				exercise
				significant
				influence
			$	$	$	$
	1	Revenue
		Transactions-
		-Service Fees	2,154,535	-	-	2,154,535
		-Fair Value on	-	-	32,459	32,459
		interest free Loan to
		Director
	2	Loans and Advances	-	836,411	4,017	840,427
		given
	3	Consultancy Charges	-	-	39,539	39,539
	4	Sale of Identified	-	170,089	-	170,089
		assets and liabilities

F-34

---

												Year ended December 31, 2009
	Sr		Nature of Transactions			Holding			Entities over			Key			Total
	No					Company			which Directors			Managerial
									are able to			Personnel
									exercise
									significant
									influence
						$			$			$			$
	1		Revenue Transactions-
			- Service Fees			591,773			-			-			591,773
			- Fair value on interest			-			-			28,105			28,105
			free Loan to Director
	2		Loans and Advances			-			1,047,491			11,140			1,058,631
			given
	3		Loans and Advances			-			611,450			-			611,450
			taken
	4		Consultancy Charges			-			-			37,076			37,076
	5		Sale of Fixed Assets			-			54,857			-			54,857

Closing Balance as on December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

									December 31, 2010
	Sr		Nature of			Holding			Entities over			Key			Total
	No		Transactions			Company			which Directors			Managerial
									are able to			Personnel
									exercise
									significant
									influence
						$			$			$			$
	1		Financial Assets			-			-			430,298			430,298
			(Loan)
	2		Other Current Assets			-			3,674			15,622			19,296
	3		Other Current			-			502,666			-			502,666
			Liabilities
	4		Accounts Payable			922,500			156,331			-			1,078,831
	5		Deferred Revenue-			10,000			-			-			10,000
			Current

F-35

---

									December 31, 2009
	Sr		Nature of Transactions			Holding			Entities over			Key			Total
	No					Company			which Directors			Managerial
									are able to			Personnel
									exercise
									significant
									influence
						$			$			$			$
	1		Account Receivable			525,000			-			-			525,000
	2		Financial Assets (Loan)			-			-			381,404			381,404
	3		Other current Assets			-			1,947,614			11,140			1,958,754
	4		Other Current			-			939,997			-			939,997
			Liabilities
	5		Accounts Payable			925,403			-			-			925,403

Disclosure in respect of Material Related Party Transactions during the year:

	1.	Revenue transactions (Service fees) include Xalted Network Inc $ 2,154,535/- (December 31, 2009, $ 591,773/-).
	2.	Loan and Advances given include SEM India Systems Private limited $ 627,529/- (December 31, 2009, $ 6,390 /-) and KM Assets Management Private Limited. $ 208,882/- (December 31, 2009 $ 1,033,147/-)
	3.	Loan and Advance taken include SEM India Systems Private Limited $ Nil (December 31, 2009 , $ 611,450 /-)
	4.	Consultancy Charges include Ajay Batheja $ 39,539/- (December 31, 2009, $ 37,076/-).
	5.	Sales of fixed assets include SEM India Systems Private Limited $ Nil (December 31, 2009 $ 54,857/-)

24.	Contingencies and commitments Contingencies

	i.	The Income Tax Assessing Officer has raised a demand for additional Tax liability for A.Y. 06- 07, AY 07-08 and AY 08-09. The Company has made additional provision for Income Tax Demand Liability in respect of AY 2008-09 of $ 95,998/-. The Company is contesting the order of denial of section 10A benefits claimed by the Company in AY 2006-07, 07-08 and 08-09 under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The estimated contingency amounts to $ 224,949/- as of December 31, 2010 and $ 141,592/- as on December 31, 2009. The management believes that it has strong merits for this petition and hence it will not have the material adverse affect on Xalted's results of operations, liquidity or financial position and has filed an Appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax.

Legal Proceedings

(a)

The Company has an ongoing dispute with one of their Customers in Africa in view of the SOW changing at regular intervals and new requirements being added regularly against what has been agreed as per Contract. The Company had received a Notice from the Customer about the cancellation of the Contract almost more than 6 months back and has not heard from them thereafter.

F-36

---

(b)

A Winding Up Petition filed against the Company by Arasor Corporation, USA for an outstanding amount of $ 4.56 Millions has been admitted by a Single Bench Judge in the High Court, Karnataka. The Company has disputed the outstanding amount and filed an appeal against the said Order to a Two Bench Judge in the High Court, Karnataka., as no amount is due to Arasor Corporation, USA against the supplies and the matter being of a Civil nature, the Petition needs to be dismissed. The Two Bench Judge based on Xalted’s submission has passed an Interim Stay Order against the admission. The Company’s Lawyers have informed that the Company has a reasonably strong stand and a good chance of success in the present proceedings before the Division Bench.

Operating leases

Rental expense for operating leases amounted to $237,754 and $294,262 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The future minimum lease commitments of Xalted under operating lease period are as follows:

			2010
	Year ended December 31,	$
	2011		79,002
	2012		-
	Total obligation		79,002
			2009
	Year ended December 31,	$
	2010		128,351
	2011		75,837
	Total obligation		204,188

26.	Stockholder’s Equity
	Common Stock
	As at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, company has issued 2,205,000 equity shares of par value of Rs 10/- ($ 0.22) each to Xalted Networks Inc. (Parent company) and its nominees. The Company has not paid any cash dividends on common stock. There is no current anticipation of paying cash dividends in future.

F-37

---

27.	Subsequent events
	On April 15, 2011, the Board of Directors have authorized the financial statements as per US GAAP. Hence, events between January 1, 2011 to April 15, 2011 have been considered as subsequent events for ascertaining the adjustment to be made to the financial statements.
	The Company owned a leasehold land in Whitefield, Bangalore which was allotted to the Company by Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) in 2004. The Company being unable to fulfill the conditions laid down by KIADB, sold the leasehold land on 14th January, 2011 to Krishil Tech Park Private Ltd., Bengaluru, (a related party) with Mr. Pratap. S. Kondamoori and Mr. Rajendra Manikonda, Directors of the Company being also nominated Directors in Krishil Tech Park Pvt. Ltd., in order to fulfill the conditions laid down by KIADB with no vested interest, for a total consideration of $ 781,076/-.The Book Value of Land as on 31st December, 2010 is $ 803,412/-.

	For and on behalf of Board of Directors
	/s/ Pratap Kondamoori
	Pratap Kondamoori
	Chairman
	/s/ Rajendra Manikonda
	Rajendra Manikonda
	Director
	/s/ Ajay Batheja
Place : Mumbai	Ajay Batheja
Date : April 15, 2011	Director & CEO

F-38

---

Kranem Corporation

Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)

On May 13, 2011, Kranem Corporation (“Kranem”) issued 2,326,844 shares of its common stock, for all of the outstanding common stock of Xalted Networks, Inc. (“Xalted Networks”), an investment holding company with no operations and the controlling shareholder of Xalted Information Systems (Pvt.) Ltd.

The unaudited pro forma information is based upon the historical financial statements of Kranem and the consolidated historical financial statements of Xalted Information Systems (Pvt.) Ltd.

		December 31, 2010
					Xalted			Xalted			Pro Forma
		Kranem			Networks			Information			Combined
		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount
Revenues	$						$	7,922,315			7,922,315
Cost of revenues								5,078,414			5,078,414
Gross profit								2,843,901			2,843,901
Operating expenses
Selling and marketing expenses								418,451			418,451
General and administrative expenses		9,557						545,648			555,205
Total operating expenses		9,557						964,099			973,656
Income from operations		(9,557	)					1,879,802			1870,245
Other income (expenses)
Interest income
Interest expense								20,634			20,634
Other income, net								416,378			416,378
Total other income (expenses)								395,744			395,744
Income before income taxes		(9,557	)					2,275,546			2,265,989
Provision for income taxes								276,175			276,175
Net income	$	(9,557	)				$	1,999,371			1,989,814

F-39

---

Kranem Corporation
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
(Stated in US Dollars)

		December 31, 2010
					Xalted			Xalted			Proforma
		Kranem			Networks			Information			Consolidated
		Amount			Amount			Amount			Amount
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	143		$	1		$	545,374		$	545,518
Available for sale financial assets								172,538,			172,538,
Financial assets								455,856			455,856
Accounts receivables, net of allowances								5,422,724			5,422,724
Accounts receivables, related parties
Inventories								145,023			145,023
Deferred tax assets, net								123,838			123,838
Current tax assets net of provisions for income tax								463,021			463,021
Prepaid expenses and other current assets								176,712			176,712
Total Current Assets		143			1			7,505,086			7,505,229
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment, net								1,001,511			1,001,511
Intangible assets, net								47,730			47,730
Financial assets								81,925			81,925
Deferred tax assets, net								3,202			3,202
Other Non-Current Assets								173,071			173,071
Total Non-Current Assets								1,307,439			1,307,439
TOTAL ASSETS	$	143		$	1		$	8,812,525		$	8,812,669
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	11,692		$			$	1,473,734		$	1,485,436
Accounts payable – related parties		112,600						1,078,831			1,191,431
Deferred revenues								88,215			88,215

F-40

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
2.1	Share Exchange Agreement, dated May 12, 2011, among the Company, Xalted Networks, Inc. and Xalted Holding Corporation
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Company [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on December 8, 2004]
3.2	Bylaws of the Company [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on December 8, 2004]
10.1	Assignment of Note Agreement, executed as of May 13, 2011, among the Company, Xalted Holding Corporation, Imprenord, ME, Empire Capital Partners, L.P., and Peter Richards
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Company

 

---