Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Symetra Financial CORP | v59133exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Symetra Financial CORP | v59133exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Symetra Financial CORP | v59133exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Symetra Financial CORP | v59133exv32w2.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - Symetra Financial CORP | v59133exv10w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-33808
SYMETRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0978027 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
777 108th Avenue NE, Suite 1200
Bellevue, Washington 98004
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(425) 256-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Bellevue, Washington 98004
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(425) 256-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 6, 2011, the Registrant had 118,538,606 common voting shares outstanding, with a par
value of $0.01 per share.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
56 | ||||||||
EX-10.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to
we, our, us and the Company are to Symetra Financial Corporation together with its
subsidiaries. References to Symetra refer to Symetra Financial Corporation on a stand-alone,
non-consolidated basis.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains statements, which constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of
current or historical facts included or referenced in this report that address activities, events
or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, are forward-looking
statements. The words will, believe, intend, plan, expect, anticipate, project,
estimate, predict, potential and similar expressions also are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with
respect to Symetra Financial Corporations:
| estimates or projections of revenues, net income, net income per share, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income per share, market share or other financial forecasts; | ||
| trends in operations, financial performance and financial condition; | ||
| financial and operating targets or plans; and | ||
| business and growth strategy. |
These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by Symetra in light of its
experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments, as well as other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. Whether
actual results and developments will conform to Symetras expectations and predictions is subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and contingencies that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations, including, among others:
| general economic, market or business conditions, including further economic downturns or other adverse conditions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets; | ||
| the availability of capital and financing; | ||
| potential investment losses; | ||
| the effects of fluctuations in interest rates and a prolonged low interest rate environment; | ||
| recorded reserves for future policy benefits and claims subsequently proving to be inadequate or inaccurate; | ||
| deviations from assumptions used in setting prices for insurance and annuity products; | ||
| continued viability of certain products under various economic and other conditions; | ||
| market pricing and competitive trends related to insurance products and services; | ||
| changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements; | ||
| financial strength or credit ratings downgrades; | ||
| the continued availability and cost of reinsurance coverage; | ||
| changes in laws or regulations, or their interpretation, including those that could increase Symetras business costs and required capital levels; | ||
| the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends to Symetra; | ||
| the ability of the new executive leadership team to successfully implement business strategies; | ||
| the effects of implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA); | ||
| the effects of implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd Frank Act); and |
3
Table of Contents
| the risks that are described in Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors in this report; and Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. |
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these
cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments
anticipated by Symetra will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the
expected consequences to, or effects on, Symetra or its business or operations. Symetra assumes no
obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
4
Table of Contents
PART I Financial Information
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
(In millions, except share and per share data)
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: $20,911.1 and $20,416.5, respectively) |
$ | 21,785.4 | $ | 21,281.8 | ||||
Marketable equity securities, at fair value (cost: $52.8 and $52.8, respectively) |
46.4 | 45.1 | ||||||
Trading securities: |
||||||||
Marketable equity securities, at fair value (cost: $192.2 and $168.0, respectively) |
224.7 | 189.3 | ||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
1,862.0 | 1,713.0 | ||||||
Policy loans |
70.4 | 71.5 | ||||||
Investments in limited partnerships (includes $34.9 and $36.5 measured at fair value,
respectively) |
198.8 | 186.9 | ||||||
Other invested assets |
12.8 | 12.6 | ||||||
Total investments |
24,200.5 | 23,500.2 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
307.9 | 274.6 | ||||||
Accrued investment income |
267.3 | 257.6 | ||||||
Accounts receivable and other receivables |
63.6 | 65.6 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverables |
283.9 | 280.8 | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
262.5 | 250.0 | ||||||
Goodwill |
28.9 | 28.4 | ||||||
Other assets |
106.2 | 98.0 | ||||||
Separate account assets |
901.5 | 881.7 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 26,422.3 | $ | 25,636.9 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Funds held under deposit contracts |
$ | 21,553.4 | $ | 20,953.3 | ||||
Future policy benefits |
399.3 | 398.4 | ||||||
Policy and contract claims |
108.2 | 116.6 | ||||||
Unearned premiums |
12.5 | 12.2 | ||||||
Other policyholders funds |
112.9 | 111.0 | ||||||
Notes payable |
449.1 | 449.0 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities, net |
110.2 | 99.0 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
344.2 | 235.1 | ||||||
Separate account liabilities |
901.5 | 881.7 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
23,991.3 | 23,256.3 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 118,535,188 issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2011; 118,216,470 issued and 118,215,701 outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 |
1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,451.1 | 1,450.2 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
544.7 | 496.7 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
434.0 | 432.5 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,431.0 | 2,380.6 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 26,422.3 | $ | 25,636.9 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 120.9 | $ | 119.0 | ||||
Net investment income |
310.0 | 286.9 | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
44.7 | 40.5 | ||||||
Net realized investment gains: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
(0.9 | ) | (17.9 | ) | ||||
Less: portion of losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
| 8.2 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(0.9 | ) | (9.7 | ) | ||||
Other net realized investment gains |
16.5 | 16.5 | ||||||
Total net realized investment gains |
15.6 | 6.8 | ||||||
Total revenues |
491.2 | 453.2 | ||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
92.3 | 86.2 | ||||||
Interest credited |
228.3 | 218.5 | ||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
66.0 | 59.6 | ||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
20.1 | 15.4 | ||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
414.7 | 387.7 | ||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
76.5 | 65.5 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes: |
||||||||
Current |
11.2 | 9.9 | ||||||
Deferred |
10.4 | 9.3 | ||||||
Total provision for income taxes |
21.6 | 19.2 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | ||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 | ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
137.292 | 131.018 | ||||||
Diluted |
137.300 | 131.038 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.05 | $ | |
See accompanying notes.
6
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2010 |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 1,165.7 | $ | 316.4 | $ | (49.7 | ) | $ | 1,433.3 | |||||||||
Common stock issued (net of issuance costs of $20.4) |
0.3 | 282.4 | | | 282.7 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 46.3 | | 46.3 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (net of taxes: $112.7) |
| | | 209.2 | 209.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes |
255.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 0.2 | | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 1,448.3 | $ | 362.7 | $ | 159.5 | $ | 1,971.7 | ||||||||||
Balances as of January 1, 2011 |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 1,450.2 | $ | 496.7 | $ | 432.5 | $ | 2,380.6 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 54.9 | | 54.9 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (net of taxes: $0.8) |
| | | 1.5 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes |
56.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 0.9 | | | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| | (6.9 | ) | | (6.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balances as of March 31, 2011 |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 1,451.1 | $ | 544.7 | $ | 434.0 | $ | 2,431.0 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
7
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net realized investment gains |
(15.6 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||
Accretion and amortization of invested assets, net |
9.8 | 8.8 | ||||||
Accrued interest on bonds |
(7.8 | ) | (11.5 | ) | ||||
Amortization and depreciation |
6.0 | 4.2 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision |
10.4 | 9.3 | ||||||
Interest credited on deposit contracts |
228.3 | 218.5 | ||||||
Mortality and expense charges and administrative fees |
(26.7 | ) | (25.4 | ) | ||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Accrued investment income |
(9.7 | ) | (10.3 | ) | ||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net |
(16.2 | ) | (14.1 | ) | ||||
Other receivables |
(2.0 | ) | 0.2 | |||||
Future policy benefits |
0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||
Policy and contract claims |
(8.4 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||
Current income taxes |
4.0 | 0.6 | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(14.7 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
1.0 | 0.2 | ||||||
Total adjustments |
159.3 | 163.3 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
214.2 | 209.6 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities and marketable equity securities |
(1,089.7 | ) | (1,024.8 | ) | ||||
Other invested assets and investments in limited partnerships |
(5.4 | ) | (8.9 | ) | ||||
Issuances of mortgage loans |
(183.5 | ) | (45.8 | ) | ||||
Issuances of policy loans |
(3.1 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||
Maturities, calls, paydowns, and other |
559.4 | 387.5 | ||||||
Sales of: |
||||||||
Fixed maturities and marketable equity securities |
125.0 | 176.4 | ||||||
Other invested assets and investments in limited partnerships |
4.1 | 4.9 | ||||||
Repayments of mortgage loans |
32.9 | 18.8 | ||||||
Repayments of policy loans |
3.9 | 4.8 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term investments |
0.2 | (51.9 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
(2.1 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(558.3 | ) | (544.1 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Policyholder account balances: |
||||||||
Deposits |
722.8 | 495.3 | ||||||
Withdrawals |
(332.4 | ) | (295.2 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
| 282.7 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid on common stock |
(6.9 | ) | | |||||
Other, net |
(6.1 | ) | (16.8 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
377.4 | 466.0 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
33.3 | 131.5 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
274.6 | 257.8 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 307.9 | $ | 389.3 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
||||||||
Non-cash transactions during the period: |
||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships and capital obligations incurred |
$ | 13.4 | $ | 18.6 | ||||
Bond exchanges |
18.8 | 6.0 |
See accompanying notes.
8
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Symetra Financial Corporation is a Delaware corporation that, through its subsidiaries, offers
group and individual insurance products and retirement products, including annuities, marketed
through benefits consultants, financial institutions and independent agents and advisors in all
states and the District of Columbia. The Companys principal products include medical stop-loss
insurance, fixed and variable deferred annuities, single premium immediate annuities and individual
life insurance.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for interim reporting. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that may
affect the amounts reported in the interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited but in managements opinion
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary for a
fair presentation.
The accompanying interim financial statements include, on a consolidated basis, the accounts
of Symetra Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as
Symetra Financial or the Company. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated.
These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC. The consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2010 was derived from audited consolidated financial statements as of that date,
but certain information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements have been
excluded. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company revised its estimate for bonus interest reserves
on one of its universal life products. This bonus interest is not earned by the contract holder if
the policys credited rate is equal to the guaranteed minimum. Due to the negative impact the low
interest rate environment has had on investment yields, the credited interest rate was adjusted
downward to the guaranteed minimum rate over the past 12 months, beginning in first quarter 2010.
As a result, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, income from operations before income taxes
was $7.4 higher than it would have been without this adjustment. The impact on net income for the
same period was $4.8, or $0.03 per share of common stock.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurement. The guidance in this ASU requires additional disclosures about an
entitys fair value measurements, including information about inputs to Level 2 measurements, gross
transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, and information about activity for Level 3 measurements
on a gross basis. It also clarifies the level of disaggregation required for existing fair value
disclosures. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2010, except for the provisions
regarding activity for Level 3 measurements presented on a gross basis, which was adopted on
January 1, 2011, as provided for in the guidance. See Note 6 for the Companys disclosures related
to fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-15, How Investments Held through Separate Accounts Affect an Insurers Consolidation
Analysis of Those Investments
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-15, Financial Services Insurance (Topic 944) How
Investments Held through Separate Accounts Affect an Insurers Consolidation Analysis of Those
Investments. This guidance clarifies that an insurer should only consider its ownership interests
held within its general account when determining if it holds a controlling interest, thus excluding
9
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
interests held in a separate account from the analysis. It does not change the guidance for
consolidating investments when the general account holds a controlling interest. The Company
adopted this guidance on January 1, 2011, which did not change the Companys current practice of
excluding ownership interests held in its separate account from its consolidation analysis.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts
In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Financial Services Insurance (Topic 944)
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts. This guidance
limits the amount of deferrable acquisition costs to those incremental costs directly related to
the successful acquisition of an insurance contract and clarifies which costs are included in that
definition. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.
Retrospective application, as well as early adoption, are permitted, but not required. The Company
expects to retrospectively adopt this guidance on January 1, 2012, and is currently evaluating the
impact of adoption on its financial statements.
ASU 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt
Restructuring
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310) A Creditors
Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This guidance aims to
eliminate diversity in practice by clarifying the criteria for whether a troubled debt
restructuring has occurred when a creditor modifies a financing receivable for a borrower. The
guidance is effective for the interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2011. Application
is required to be retrospective to the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is
adopted. Upon adoption of ASU 2011-02, additional disclosures required by the guidance in ASU
2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses must be provided if a loan modification is determined to be a troubled debt restructuring.
The Company will adopt this guidance on July 1, 2011, and expects to apply the guidance
retrospectively to the January 1, 2011 at that time. The Company does not expect this guidance will
have a material impact on its financial statements.
3. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represents the amount of earnings for the period available to each
share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share
represents the earnings available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting
period, adjusted for potential issuance of dilutive common stock.
The Companys outstanding warrants and certain restricted stock granted to employees are
included in weighted-average common shares outstanding for the purposes of computing basic and
diluted earnings per share, using the two-class method. These are considered participating or
potential common stock securities because the terms of the agreements entitle the holders to
receive any dividends declared concurrently with the holders of outstanding shares of common stock,
on a one-to-one basis. Non-participating restricted stock is included in diluted earnings per share
based on the application of the treasury stock method.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, 2.950 stock options were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share, based on the application of the treasury stock method,
because they were antidilutive. There were no stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
10
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents information relating to the Companys calculations of basic and
diluted earnings per share:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding basic |
137.292 | 131.018 | ||||||
Add: dilutive effect of restricted stock |
0.008 | 0.020 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding diluted |
137.300 | 131.038 | ||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 |
4. Investments
The following tables summarize the Companys available-for-sale fixed maturities and
marketable equity securities. The other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) in accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI) represent the amount of cumulative non-credit OTTI losses transferred
to, or recorded in, AOCI for securities that also had a credit-related impairment.
Cost or | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 154.8 | $ | 2.8 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | 156.7 | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
471.2 | 5.3 | (13.7 | ) | 462.8 | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
14,344.6 | 820.7 | (168.4 | ) | 14,996.9 | (18.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,711.1 | 140.1 | (35.9 | ) | 3,815.3 | (39.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,706.6 | 108.1 | (11.8 | ) | 1,802.9 | (3.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
522.8 | 34.9 | (6.9 | ) | 550.8 | (4.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
20,911.1 | 1,111.9 | (237.6 | ) | 21,785.4 | (66.0 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
52.8 | 0.3 | (6.7 | ) | 46.4 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,963.9 | $ | 1,112.2 | $ | (244.3 | ) | $ | 21,831.8 | $ | (66.0 | ) | ||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 30.3 | $ | 2.8 | $ | | $ | 33.1 | $ | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
462.9 | 5.3 | (15.4 | ) | 452.8 | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
13,891.7 | 855.3 | (205.6 | ) | 14,541.4 | (26.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,707.2 | 148.9 | (54.5 | ) | 3,801.6 | (40.0 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,782.2 | 115.2 | (10.1 | ) | 1,887.3 | (3.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
542.2 | 35.8 | (12.4 | ) | 565.6 | (6.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
20,416.5 | 1,163.3 | (298.0 | ) | 21,281.8 | (76.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
52.8 | 0.1 | (7.8 | ) | 45.1 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,469.3 | $ | 1,163.4 | $ | (305.8 | ) | $ | 21,326.9 | $ | (76.2 | ) | ||||||||
The following tables summarize gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
available-for-sale investments. For fixed maturities, gross unrealized losses include the portion
of OTTI recorded in AOCI. The tables are aggregated by investment
11
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
category and present separately those securities that have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | # of | Fair | Unrealized | # of | |||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 124.1 | $ | (0.9 | ) | 4 | $ | | $ | | | |||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
141.2 | (3.2 | ) | 20 | 126.7 | (10.5 | ) | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
2,483.2 | (79.5 | ) | 227 | 844.3 | (88.9 | ) | 93 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
659.2 | (21.9 | ) | 50 | 199.0 | (14.0 | ) | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
167.7 | (4.5 | ) | 24 | 61.2 | (7.3 | ) | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
37.3 | (0.7 | ) | 7 | 81.6 | (6.2 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 3,612.7 | $ | (110.7 | ) | 332 | $ | 1,312.8 | $ | (126.9 | ) | 167 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities,
available-for-sale |
19.2 | (1.2 | ) | 1 | 25.6 | (5.5 | ) | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,631.9 | $ | (111.9 | ) | 333 | $ | 1,338.4 | $ | (132.4 | ) | 169 | ||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | # of | Fair | Unrealized | # of | |||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
$ | 139.1 | $ | (3.3 | ) | 19 | $ | 146.9 | $ | (12.1 | ) | 24 | ||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
2,191.5 | (92.2 | ) | 203 | 897.7 | (113.4 | ) | 105 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
525.8 | (18.6 | ) | 37 | 273.1 | (35.9 | ) | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
160.5 | (2.9 | ) | 26 | 63.2 | (7.2 | ) | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
41.4 | (0.8 | ) | 7 | 94.9 | (11.6 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 3,058.3 | $ | (117.8 | ) | 292 | $ | 1,475.8 | $ | (180.2 | ) | 198 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities,
available-for-sale |
19.9 | (0.7 | ) | 2 | 24.1 | (7.1 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,078.2 | $ | (118.5 | ) | 294 | $ | 1,499.9 | $ | (187.3 | ) | 201 | ||||||||||||
Based on National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) ratings, as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company held below-investment-grade fixed maturities with fair
values of $1,337.5 and $1,257.5, respectively, and amortized costs of $1,371.4 and $1,321.2,
respectively. These holdings amounted to 6.1% and 5.9% of the Companys investments in fixed
maturities at fair value as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities as of
March 31, 2011, by contractual years to maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without
prepayment penalties.
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
One year or less |
$ | 492.6 | $ | 502.3 | ||||
Over one year through five years |
3,310.4 | 3,510.5 | ||||||
Over five years through ten years |
6,290.3 | 6,622.4 | ||||||
Over ten years |
4,919.7 | 5,030.0 | ||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,711.1 | 3,815.3 | ||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,706.6 | 1,802.9 | ||||||
Other asset-backed securities |
480.4 | 502.0 | ||||||
Total fixed maturities |
$ | 20,911.1 | $ | 21,785.4 | ||||
12
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Companys net investment income:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Fixed maturities |
$ | 286.7 | $ | 271.0 | ||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.9 | 0.7 | ||||||
Mortgage loans |
27.9 | 18.8 | ||||||
Policy loans |
1.0 | 1.1 | ||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
(2.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||
Other |
1.3 | 1.1 | ||||||
Total investment income |
315.8 | 292.1 | ||||||
Investment expenses |
(5.8 | ) | (5.2 | ) | ||||
Net investment income |
$ | 310.0 | $ | 286.9 | ||||
The following table summarizes the Companys net realized investment gains:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Fixed maturities: |
||||||||
Gross gains on sales |
$ | 2.7 | $ | 10.4 | ||||
Gross losses on sales |
(6.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary impairments |
(0.9 | ) | (9.7 | ) | ||||
Other(1) |
8.2 | 2.3 | ||||||
Total fixed maturities |
3.9 | 1.9 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading(2) |
12.2 | 7.6 | ||||||
Other invested assets |
0.5 | (1.4 | ) | |||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment |
(1.0 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||
Net realized investment gains |
$ | 15.6 | $ | 6.8 | ||||
(1) | This includes net gains on calls and redemptions and changes in the fair value of the Companys convertible securities held as of period end totaling $1.8 and $2.5 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. | |
(2) | This includes changes in fair value of trading securities held as of period end, totaling $11.6 and $4.8 of net gains for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
The Companys review of investment securities for OTTI includes both quantitative and
qualitative criteria. Quantitative criteria include the length of time and amount that each
security is in an unrealized loss position (i.e., is underwater) and, for fixed maturities, whether
expected future cash flows indicate that a credit loss exists.
While all securities are monitored for impairment, the Companys experience indicates that
securities for which the cost or amortized cost exceeds fair value by less than 20% do not
represent a significant risk of impairment and, often, fair values recover over time as the factors
that caused the declines improve. If the estimated fair value has declined and remained below cost
or amortized cost by 20% or more for at least six months, the Company further analyzes the decrease
in fair value to determine whether it is an other-than-temporary decline. To make this
determination for each security, the Company considers, among other factors:
| Extent and duration of the decline in fair value below cost or amortized cost; | ||
| The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the security, including any specific events that may affect its operations, earnings potential or compliance with terms and covenants of the security; | ||
| Changes in the financial condition of the securitys underlying collateral; | ||
| Any downgrades of the security by a rating agency; |
13
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
| Any reduction or elimination of dividends or non-payment of scheduled interest payments; | ||
| Other indications that a credit loss has occurred; and | ||
| For fixed maturities, the Companys intent to sell or whether it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity prior to recovery of its amortized cost, considering any regulatory developments and the Companys liquidity needs. |
For fixed maturities, if the Company determines that the present value of the cash flows
expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the security (i.e., a credit loss
exists), the Company concludes that an OTTI has occurred. In order to determine the amount of the
credit loss, the Company calculates the recovery value by discounting the current expectations of
future cash flows it expects to recover. The discount rate is the effective interest rate implicit
in the underlying fixed maturity. The effective interest rate is the original effective yield for
corporate securities, or current effective yield for mortgage-backed securities.
Determination of OTTI on Corporate Securities
To determine the recovery value, credit loss or intent to sell for a corporate security, the
Company performs an analysis related to the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the
following:
| Expected cash flows of the issuer; | ||
| Fundamentals of the industry in which the issuer operates; | ||
| Fundamentals of the issuer to determine what the Company would recover if the issuer were to file for bankruptcy, compared to the price at which the market is trading; | ||
| Earnings multiples for an issuers industry or sector of the industry, divided by the outstanding debt to determine an expected recovery value of the security in the case of a liquidation; | ||
| Expectations regarding defaults and recovery rates; | ||
| Changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; and | ||
| Additional market information. |
Determination of OTTI on Structured Securities
To determine the recovery value, credit loss or intent to sell for a structured security,
including residential mortgage-, commercial mortgage- and other asset-backed securities, the
Company performs an analysis related to the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the
following:
| Discounted cash flow analysis based on the future cash flows the Company expects to recover; | ||
| Level of creditworthiness; | ||
| Delinquency ratios and loan-to-value ratios; | ||
| Average cumulative collateral loss, vintage year and level of subordination; | ||
| Susceptibility to fair value fluctuations due to changes in the interest rate environment; | ||
| Susceptibility to variability of prepayments; and | ||
| Susceptibility to reinvestment risk. |
14
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the severity and duration of the gross unrealized losses on the
Companys underwater available-for-sale securities, after the recognition of OTTI:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturities | ||||||||||||||||
Underwater by 20% or more: |
||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 consecutive months |
$ | 25.4 | $ | (7.7 | ) | $ | 69.1 | $ | (23.7 | ) | ||||||
6 consecutive months or more |
29.6 | (12.5 | ) | 93.9 | (36.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater by 20% or more |
55.0 | (20.2 | ) | 163.0 | (59.9 | ) | ||||||||||
All other underwater fixed maturities |
4,870.5 | (217.4 | ) | 4,371.1 | (238.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater fixed maturities |
$ | 4,925.5 | $ | (237.6 | ) | $ | 4,534.1 | $ | (298.0 | ) | ||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
Underwater by 20% or more: |
||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 consecutive months |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
6 consecutive months or more |
1.7 | (4.4 | ) | 1.7 | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater by 20% or more |
1.7 | (4.4 | ) | 1.7 | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||||
All other underwater marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
43.1 | (2.3 | ) | 42.3 | (3.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total underwater marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
$ | 44.8 | $ | (6.7 | ) | $ | 44.0 | $ | (7.8 | ) | ||||||
The Company reviewed its available-for-sale investments with unrealized losses as of
March 31, 2011 in accordance with its impairment policy and determined, after the recognition of
other-than-temporary impairments, that the remaining declines in fair value were temporary. The
Company did not intend to sell its underwater fixed maturities and it was not more likely than not
that the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturities before recovery of amortized cost.
This conclusion is supported by the Companys spread analysis, cash flow modeling and expected
continuation of contractually required principal and interest payments.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company did not intend to sell its underwater
available-for-sale marketable equity securities, primarily consisting of non-redeemable preferred
stocks, and based on its analysis of its underwater available-for-sale marketable equity
securities, including an evaluation of the near term prospects of the issuers, it had the intent
and ability to hold them until recovery. Therefore, the Company concluded that the declines in fair
value of these securities were temporary.
Changes in the amount of credit-related OTTI recognized in net income where the portion
related to other factors was recognized in other comprehensive income were as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 68.0 | $ | 69.6 | ||||
Increases recognized in the current period: |
||||||||
For which an OTTI was not previously recognized |
0.4 | 6.0 | ||||||
For which an OTTI was previously recognized |
| 1.5 | ||||||
Decreases attributable to: |
||||||||
Securities sold or paid down during the period |
(16.2 | ) | (7.6 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 52.2 | $ | 69.5 | ||||
5. Mortgage Loans
The Company originates and manages a portfolio of mortgage loans which are secured by
first-mortgage liens on income-producing commercial real estate, primarily in the retail,
industrial and office building sectors. All loans are underwritten consistently using standards
based on loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-service coverage ratios (DSCR) as well as detailed
market, property and borrower analyses. The Companys mortgage loan portfolio is considered a
single portfolio segment and class of financing receivable,
15
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
which is consistent with how the Company assesses and monitors the risk and performance of the
portfolio. A large majority of these loans have personal guarantees and all loans are inspected and
evaluated annually. The Companys mortgage loan portfolio is diversified by geographic region, loan
size and scheduled maturities. As of March 31, 2011, 32.3% of our commercial mortgage loans were
located in California, 15.0% were located in Washington and 9.9% were located in Texas. Individual
loans generally do not exceed $15.0.
Allowance for Mortgage Loans
The allowance for losses on mortgage loans provides for the risk of credit loss inherent in
the lending process. The allowance includes a portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not
specifically identified losses and, as needed, specific reserves for non-performing loans. The
allowance for losses on mortgage loans is evaluated as of each reporting period and adjustments are
recorded when appropriate. To assist in its evaluation of the allowance for loan losses the Company
utilizes the following credit quality indicators to categorize its loans as lower, medium or higher
risk:
| Lower Risk Loans Loans with an LTV ratio of less than 65%, and a DSCR of greater than 1.50. | ||
| Medium Risk Loans Loans that have an LTV ratio of less than 65% but a DSCR below 1.50, or loans with an LTV ratio between 65% and 80%, and a DSCR of greater than 1.50. | ||
| Higher Risk Loans All loans with an LTV ratio greater than 80%, or loans which have an LTV ratio between 65% and 80%, and a DSCR of less than 1.50. |
The following table sets forth the Companys mortgage loans by risk category:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
% of Total | Carrying Value |
% of Total | |||||||||||||
Lower Risk |
$ | 1,020.4 | 54.6 | % | $ | 917.5 | 53.3 | % | ||||||||
Medium Risk |
380.8 | 20.4 | 430.4 | 25.0 | ||||||||||||
Higher Risk |
468.6 | 25.0 | 372.3 | 21.7 | ||||||||||||
Credit quality indicator total |
1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other (1) |
(7.8 | ) | (7.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,862.0 | $ | 1,713.0 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Other includes the allowance for loan losses, deferred fees and costs, and a 2004 purchase accounting adjustment. |
In developing its portfolio reserve for incurred but not specifically identified losses
the Company evaluates loans by risk category as well as its past loan experience, commercial real
estate market conditions, and third party data for expected losses on loans with similar LTV ratios
and DSCRs. For existing loans, the Companys LTV ratios and DSCRs are updated each year between
June 1 and September 30.
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for mortgage loan losses, which
includes portfolio and specific reserves:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Allowance at beginning of period |
$ | 7.1 | $ | 8.2 | ||||
Provision for loans not specifically identified |
| 0.1 | ||||||
Allowance at end of period |
$ | 7.1 | $ | 8.3 | ||||
Specific reserves are established for non-performing loans, which are those loans that
are more than 90 days past due on payment or for which the Company considers it probable that
amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement will not be
collected. As of March 31, 2011, no loans were considered non-performing or were specifically
evaluated and identified as impaired. As of March 31, 2010, the $8.3 reserve included a $2.2
specific reserve associated with one non-performing loan.
16
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value
hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize its use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company has categorized its financial
instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into the three-level
hierarchy, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level within
which a fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest-level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys financial assets recorded at fair value on
the consolidated balance sheets are categorized as follows:
| Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. This level primarily consists of exchange-traded marketable equity securities and actively traded mutual fund investments. | ||
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. This level includes those financial instruments that are valued using industry-standard pricing methodologies, models or other valuation methodologies. All significant inputs are observable, derived from observable information in the marketplace or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the market place. Financial instruments in this category primarily include certain corporate fixed maturities, government or agency securities and certain mortgage-backed securities. | ||
| Level 3 Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable. This comprises financial instruments for which fair value is estimated based on industry-standard pricing methodologies and internally developed models utilizing significant inputs not based on or corroborated by readily available market information. In limited circumstances, this category may also utilize non-binding broker quotes. This category primarily consists of certain less liquid fixed maturities, including certain corporate private placement securities, and investments in private equity funds. |
The following tables present the financial assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis, classified by the valuation hierarchy described above. The Company has no financial
liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Percent | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 156.7 | $ | | $ | 156.7 | $ | | | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
462.8 | | 462.8 | | | |||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
14,996.9 | | 14,227.5 | 769.4 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,815.3 | | 3,815.3 | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,802.9 | | 1,785.2 | 17.7 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
550.8 | | 400.4 | 150.4 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
21,785.4 | | 20,847.9 | 937.5 | 4.1 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
46.4 | 44.6 | | 1.8 | | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
224.7 | 224.0 | | 0.7 | | |||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(1) |
34.9 | | | 34.9 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
6.7 | 2.3 | | 4.4 | | |||||||||||||||
Total investments carried at fair value |
22,098.1 | 270.9 | 20,847.9 | 979.3 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
901.5 | 901.5 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,999.6 | $ | 1,172.4 | $ | 20,847.9 | $ | 979.3 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||
(1) | Includes investments in private equity funds. |
17
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Percent | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
$ | 33.1 | $ | | $ | 33.1 | $ | | | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
452.8 | | 452.8 | | | |||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
14,541.4 | | 13,786.8 | 754.6 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,801.6 | | 3,801.6 | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,887.3 | | 1,868.2 | 19.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
565.6 | | 412.4 | 153.2 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
21,281.8 | | 20,354.9 | 926.9 | 4.1 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
45.1 | 43.3 | | 1.8 | | |||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
189.3 | 188.7 | | 0.6 | | |||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(1) |
36.5 | | | 36.5 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
6.4 | 2.6 | | 3.8 | | |||||||||||||||
Total investments carried at fair value |
21,559.1 | 234.6 | 20,354.9 | 969.6 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
881.7 | 881.7 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,440.8 | $ | 1,116.3 | $ | 20,354.9 | $ | 969.6 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||
(1) | Includes investments in private equity funds. |
Fixed Maturities
The vast majority of the Companys fixed maturities have been classified as Level 2
measurements. To make this assessment, the Company determines whether the market for a security is
active and if significant pricing inputs are observable. The Company predominantly utilizes third
party independent pricing services to assist management in determining the fair value of its fixed
maturity securities. As of both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, pricing services provided
prices for 95.6% of the Companys fixed maturities.
The pricing services provide prices where observable inputs are available. The Companys
pricing services utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset class. If sufficient
objectively verifiable information about a securitys valuation is not available, the pricing
services will not provide a valuation for the security.
The Company performs an analysis on the prices received from the pricing services to ensure
they represent a reasonable estimate of fair value and to gain assurance on the overall
reasonableness and consistent application of input assumptions, valuation methodologies and
compliance with accounting standards for fair value determination. This analysis is performed
through evaluation of pricing methodologies and inputs, analytical reviews of certain prices
between reporting periods, and back-testing of selected sales activity to determine whether there
were significant differences between the market price used to value the security prior to sale and
the actual sales price. Based upon this analysis, the Company has not adjusted prices obtained from
the pricing services, and multiple prices for these securities are not obtained.
In situations where the Company is unable to obtain sufficient market-observable information
to estimate the fair value of a security, the securitys fair value is determined using internal
pricing models. These models typically utilize significant, unobservable market inputs or inputs
that are difficult to corroborate with observable market data, and the resulting value is
considered a Level 3 measurement. This is generally the case for private placement securities and
other securities the pricing services are unable to price.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $866.3, or 4.0%, and $892.9, or
4.2%, respectively, of its fixed maturities invested in private placement securities. The valuation
of certain private placement securities requires significant judgment by management due to the
absence of quoted market prices, the inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such
assets. The use of significant unobservable inputs in determining the fair value of the Companys
investments in private placement securities resulted in the classification of $812.3, or 93.8%, and
$815.4, or 91.3%, as Level 3 measurements as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
18
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Corporate Securities
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Companys corporate
securities classified as Level 2 measurements was $14,227.5 and $13,786.8, respectively. The
following table presents additional information about the composition of the Level 2 corporate
securities:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total | # of Securities | Amount | % of Total | # of Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Significant Security Sectors: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
$ | 2,551.2 | 17.9 | % | 201 | $ | 2,444.7 | 17.7 | % | 225 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer staples |
2,273.8 | 16.0 | 155 | 2,118.0 | 15.4 | 157 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financials |
1,892.2 | 13.3 | 221 | 1,862.1 | 13.5 | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,721.7 | 12.1 | 170 | 1,738.2 | 12.6 | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average coupon rate |
6.21 | % | 6.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average remaining years to contractual maturity |
12.0 | 12.2 |
Corporate securities classified as Level 2 measurements are priced by independent pricing
services utilizing evaluated pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations
include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets,
benchmark securities, bids, offers and other reference data, including market research
publications. Because many corporate securities do not trade on a daily basis, evaluated pricing
applications apply available information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking
of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to prepare evaluations.
As of March 31, 2011, 91.4% of corporate securities classified as Level 3 were privately
placed securities. These securities were issued by entities primarily in the financial sector,
21.2%, the industrial sector, 21.0%, and the consumer discretionary sector, 16.2%.
As of December 31, 2010, 94.7% of corporate securities classified as Level 3 were privately
placed securities. These securities were issued by entities primarily in the industrial sector,
21.6%, the financial sector, 21.2%, and the consumer discretionary sector, 15.9%.
The valuation of these privately placed Level 3 corporate securities requires significant
judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, the inherent lack of liquidity and the
duration of such assets. The fair values of these securities were determined using a discounted
cash flow approach. The discount rate was based on the current Treasury curve, adjusted for credit
and liquidity factors. The credit factor adjustment, which is based on credit spreads to the
Treasury curve for similar securities, varies for each security based on its quality and industry
or sector. The illiquidity adjustment is estimated based on illiquidity spreads observed in
transactions involving similar securities. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the range of
illiquidity adjustments varied from 0 to 50 basis points.
The following table presents additional information about the quality of the Level 3 privately
placed corporate securities:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||
NAIC Rating: | Comparable Standard & Poors rating: | Fair Value | % of Total | Fair Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
1 | AAA, AA, A |
$ | 88.0 | 12.5 | % | $ | 118.6 | 16.6 | % | |||||||||
2 | BBB |
524.7 | 74.6 | 497.5 | 69.6 | |||||||||||||
3 - 6 | BB & below |
90.8 | 12.9 | 98.7 | 13.8 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 703.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 714.8 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
Residential Mortgage-backed Securities
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Companys residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) classified as Level 2 measurements was $3,815.3 and $3,801.6,
respectively. These securities were primarily fixed-rate, with a weighted-average coupon rate of
5.04% and 5.13% as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Agency securities
comprised 88.6% and 88.4% of the Companys Level 2 RMBS as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
The following table presents additional information about the composition of the Level 2
non-agency RMBS securities:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Standard & Poors equivalent rating: | Fair Value | % of Total | Fair Value | % of Total | ||||||||||||
AAA |
$ | 161.7 | 37.0 | % | $ | 166.6 | 37.8 | % | ||||||||
AA through BBB |
85.4 | 19.6 | 89.0 | 20.2 | ||||||||||||
BB & below |
189.3 | 43.4 | 185.4 | 42.0 | ||||||||||||
Total non-agency RMBS |
$ | 436.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | 441.0 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency RMBS with super senior subordination |
$ | 261.8 | 60.0 | % | $ | 259.2 | 58.8 | % |
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys non-agency Level 2 RMBS had a
weighted-average credit enhancement of 9.8%, and $176.3 and $181.8, or 40.4% and 41.2%,
respectively, had an origination or vintage year of 2004 and prior.
Level 2 RMBS securities are priced by independent pricing services, who utilize evaluated
pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers
and other reference data, including market research publications. Because many RMBS do not trade on
a daily basis, evaluated pricing applications apply available information through processes such as
benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing to prepare
evaluations. In addition, the pricing services use models and processes to develop prepayment and
interest rate scenarios. The pricing services monitor market indicators, industry and economic
events, and their models take into account market convention.
Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Companys commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) classified as Level 2 measurements was $1,785.2 and $1,868.2,
respectively. These were primarily non-agency securities, which comprised 70.2% and 68.3% of Level
2 CMBS as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The non-agency CMBS had an
estimated weighted-average credit enhancement of 28.7% and 28.5% as of March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively, and 94.3% were in the most senior tranche as of both March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
The Companys Level 2 CMBS had a weighted-average coupon rate of 5.44% and 5.50% as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, 18.6% and 18.2% of the underlying collateral for these securities was located in New
York, 13.0% and 13.3% was located in California, and 7.1% was located in Texas as of both periods.
The underlying collateral primarily consisted of retail shopping centers, comprising 33.3% and
33.7%, and office buildings comprising 30.8% and 30.5%, respectively, of these securities as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Level 2 CMBS securities are priced by independent pricing services, who utilize evaluated
pricing models. The significant inputs for security evaluations include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids,
offers, new issues, monthly payment information and other reference data, including market research
publications. Because many CMBS do not trade on a daily basis, evaluated pricing applications apply
available information through processes, such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities,
sector groupings and matrix pricing to prepare evaluations.
Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable equity securities are investments in common stock and certain nonredeemable
preferred stocks, which primarily consist of investments in publicly traded companies and actively
traded mutual fund investments. The fair values of the Companys
20
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
marketable equity securities are primarily based on quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets, which are classified as Level 1 measurements.
Investments in Limited Partnerships
Investments in limited partnerships recorded at fair value are investments in private equity
funds. The Company utilizes the fair value option for these investments, regardless of ownership
percentage, to standardize the related accounting and reporting.
The fair value for the Companys investments in private equity funds is based upon the
Companys proportionate interest in the underlying partnership or funds net asset value (NAV),
which approximates fair value. The Company is generally unable to liquidate these investments
during the term of the partnership or fund, which range from five to twelve years. As such, the
Company classifies these securities as Level 3 measurements.
Separate Accounts
Separate account assets are primarily invested in mutual funds with published NAVs, which are
classified as Level 1 measurements.
Rollforward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were utilized to determine
fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers | Included in: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as | In and/or | Other | Realized | Balance as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of January 1, | (Out) of | Net | Comprehensive | Gains | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | Purchases | Sales | Level 3(1) | Other(2) | Income(3) | Income | (Losses)(3) | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
$ | 754.6 | $ | 29.1 | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | (2.5 | ) | $ | | $ | 5.1 | $ | (3.9 | ) | $ | 769.4 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage backed securities |
19.1 | | | | (1.4 | ) | | | | 17.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
153.2 | 9.0 | (10.8 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | 1.5 | (1.7 | ) | 150.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
926.9 | 38.1 | (19.3 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (4.7 | ) | | 6.6 | (5.6 | ) | 937.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities,
available-for-sale |
1.8 | | | | | | | | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.6 | | | | | 0.1 | | | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
36.5 | 0.1 | | | (3.8 | ) | 1.3 | | 0.8 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
3.8 | | | | | 0.6 | | | 4.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Level 3 |
$ | 969.6 | $ | 38.2 | $ | (19.3 | ) | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | 2.0 | $ | 6.6 | $ | (4.8 | ) | $ | 979.3 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are reported at the value as of the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. Gross transfers out of Level 3 were $4.5 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. | |
(2) | Other is comprised of transactions such as pay downs, calls, amortization and redemptions. | |
(3) | Realized and unrealized gains and losses for investments in limited partnerships are included in net investment income. |
21
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and for which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were utilized to
determine fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers | Included in: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as | In and/or | Other | Realized | Balance as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of January 1, | (Out) of | Net | Comprehensive | Gains | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Purchases | Sales | Level 3(1) | Other(2) | Income(3) | Income | (Losses)(3) | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Types of Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
$ | 7.2 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.2 | $ | | $ | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
847.1 | 16.0 | (17.3 | ) | 8.2 | (1.9 | ) | | 12.2 | (1.7 | ) | 862.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
250.5 | | | | 2.7 | | 7.6 | | 260.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage backed securities |
24.0 | | | | (1.9 | ) | | 1.0 | | 23.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
54.7 | | | (0.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | | 1.3 | | 55.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
1,183.5 | 16.0 | (17.3 | ) | 8.1 | (2.0 | ) | | 22.3 | (1.7 | ) | 1,208.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
1.8 | | | | | | | | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
0.3 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships |
24.7 | 0.6 | (1.0 | ) | | | 0.8 | | 0.1 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
4.6 | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | 0.2 | | 0.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Level 3 |
$ | 1,214.9 | $ | 16.6 | $ | (18.6 | ) | $ | 8.1 | $ | (2.6 | ) | $ | 1.0 | $ | 22.3 | $ | (1.5 | ) | $ | 1,240.2 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are reported at the value as of the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. Gross transfers into and out of Level 3 were $10.3 and $(2.2), respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2010. | |
(2) | Other is comprised of transactions such as pay downs, calls, amortization, and redemptions. | |
(3) | Realized and unrealized gains and losses for investments in limited partnerships are included in net investment income. |
The following table summarizes the carrying or reported value and corresponding fair
value of financial instruments subject to fair value disclosure requirements:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
$ | 21,785.4 | $ | 21,785.4 | $ | 21,281.8 | $ | 21,281.8 | ||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
46.4 | 46.4 | 45.1 | 45.1 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
224.7 | 224.7 | 189.3 | 189.3 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans |
1,862.0 | 1,929.6 | 1,713.0 | 1,772.2 | ||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships: |
||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
34.9 | 34.9 | 36.5 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||
Tax credit investments |
163.9 | 165.5 | 150.4 | 152.6 | ||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
12.8 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
307.9 | 307.9 | 274.6 | 274.6 | ||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
901.5 | 901.5 | 881.7 | 881.7 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Funds held under deposit contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred annuities |
9,343.2 | 9,142.6 | 8,795.8 | 8,694.2 | ||||||||||||
Immediate annuities |
6,680.0 | 7,144.7 | 6,670.4 | 7,188.9 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable: |
||||||||||||||||
Capital Efficient Notes (CENts) |
149.9 | 150.0 | 149.8 | 140.9 | ||||||||||||
Senior notes |
299.2 | 311.2 | 299.2 | 301.6 |
Other Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand bank deposits and short-term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Cash
equivalents are reported at cost, which approximates fair value, and were $294.7 and $261.0 as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Cash equivalents of $291.4 and $257.9 were held
in a single highly rated overnight money market fund as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
22
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
The fair values of the Companys mortgage loans were measured by discounting the projected
future cash flows using the current rate at which the loans would be made to borrowers with similar
credit ratings and for the same maturities.
Investments in limited partnerships associated with tax credit investments are carried at
amortized cost. Fair value was estimated based on the discounted cash flows over the remaining life
of the tax credits. The discount rate used was the original internal rate of return for each
investment.
The Company estimates the fair values of funds held under deposit contracts related to
investment-type contracts using an income approach, based on the present value of the discounted
cash flows. Cash flows were projected using best estimates for lapses, mortality and expenses, and
discounted at a risk-free rate plus a nonperformance risk spread. The carrying value of this
balance excludes $5,530.2 and $5,487.1 of liabilities related to insurance contracts as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The fair values of the Companys notes payable were based on nonbinding quotes provided by
third-parties. The fair value measurement assumes that liabilities were transferred to a market
participant of equal credit standing and without consideration for any optional redemption
features.
7. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for deferred
policy acquisition costs:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Unamortized balance at beginning of period |
$ | 387.4 | $ | 325.7 | ||||
Deferral of acquisition costs |
37.0 | 30.5 | ||||||
Adjustments related to investment gains |
(0.7 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||
Amortization |
(20.1 | ) | (15.4 | ) | ||||
Unamortized balance at end of period |
403.6 | 339.8 | ||||||
Accumulated effect of net unrealized investment gains |
(141.1 | ) | (112.3 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 262.5 | $ | 227.5 | ||||
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for
deferred sales inducements, which are included in other assets:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Unamortized balance at beginning of period |
$ | 105.8 | $ | 67.6 | ||||
Capitalizations |
17.1 | 13.3 | ||||||
Adjustments related to investment gains |
(0.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Amortization |
(6.2 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||
Unamortized balance at end of period |
116.4 | 76.7 | ||||||
Accumulated effect of net unrealized investment gains |
(46.8 | ) | (29.7 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 69.6 | $ | 47.0 | ||||
23
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
8. Stockholders Equity
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||
Changes in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities(1) |
9.5 | 244.9 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net realized investment (gains) losses included in net income (2) |
(10.4 | ) | (6.1 | ) | ||||
Adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements valuation allowance(3) |
(4.2 | ) | (31.4 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary-impairments on fixed maturities not related to credit losses(4) |
6.6 | 1.8 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
1.5 | 209.2 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 56.4 | $ | 255.5 | ||||
(1) | Net of taxes of $5.1 and $131.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. | |
(2) | Net of taxes of $(5.6) and $(3.3) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, $6.6 (net of taxes of $3.6) of the reclassification adjustment is related to losses previously classified as OTTI not related to credit losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, $7.1 (net of taxes of $3.9) of the reclassification adjustment is related to losses previously classified as OTTI not related to credit losses. | |
(3) | Net of taxes of $(2.3) and $(16.9) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. | |
(4) | Net of taxes of $3.6 and $1.0 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in outstanding shares of common
stock:
Common Shares | ||||
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
92.729 | |||
Common stock, issued in initial public offering |
25.260 | |||
Restricted stock issued, net |
0.243 | |||
Employee stock purchase plan shares issued |
0.033 | |||
Treasury stock acquired(1) |
(0.001 | ) | ||
Treasury stock retired(2) |
(0.048 | ) | ||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
118.216 | |||
Balance as of January 1, 2011 |
118.216 | |||
Restricted stock issued, net |
0.295 | |||
Employee stock purchase plan shares issued |
0.024 | |||
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
118.535 | |||
(1) | Represents shares repurchased to satisfy employee income tax withholding, pursuant to the Companys Equity Plan. | |
(2) | Represents shares repurchased and subsequently retired, pursuant to the Companys Equity Plan. |
9. Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes the Companys restricted stock activity for the three months
ended March 31, 2011:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Number of | Average Fair | |||||||
Shares | Value | |||||||
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011 |
0.192 | $ | 12.61 | |||||
Shares granted |
0.297 | 13.81 | ||||||
Shares vested |
(0.001 | ) | 12.48 | |||||
Shares forfeited |
(0.002 | ) | 12.48 | |||||
Outstanding as of March 31, 2011 |
0.486 | $ | 13.14 | |||||
24
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
Because of the nature of its business, the Company is subject to legal actions filed or
threatened in the ordinary course of its business operations. The Company does not expect that any
such litigation, pending or threatened, as of March 31, 2011, will have a material adverse effect
on its consolidated financial condition, future operating results or liquidity.
Other Commitments
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, unfunded mortgage loan commitments were $41.5 and
$39.2, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had no other material new or changes to
commitments or contingencies since December 31, 2010.
11. Segment Information
The following tables present selected financial information by segment and reconcile segment
pre-tax adjusted operating income (loss) to amounts reported in the consolidated statements of
income.
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group | Annuities | Annuities | Life | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 110.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10.9 | $ | | $ | 120.9 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
4.2 | 123.1 | 105.0 | 71.2 | 6.5 | 310.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
3.3 | 5.1 | 0.2 | 30.7 | 5.4 | 44.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment gains on fixed index
annuity (FIA) options |
| 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
117.5 | 128.7 | 105.2 | 112.8 | 11.9 | 476.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
74.3 | (0.1 | ) | | 18.1 | | 92.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest credited |
| 77.6 | 89.7 | 61.7 | (0.7 | ) | 228.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
27.3 | 12.4 | 5.9 | 14.4 | 6.0 | 66.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | 8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs |
2.1 | 15.6 | 0.7 | 1.7 | | 20.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
103.7 | 105.5 | 96.3 | 95.9 | 13.3 | 414.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income
(loss) |
$ | 13.8 | $ | 23.2 | $ | 8.9 | $ | 16.9 | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | 61.4 | |||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 117.5 | $ | 128.7 | $ | 105.2 | $ | 112.8 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 476.1 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net realized investment gains,
excluding FIA options |
| 2.9 | 9.9 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 15.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
117.5 | 131.6 | 115.1 | 113.2 | 13.8 | 491.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
103.7 | 105.5 | 96.3 | 95.9 | 13.3 | 414.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 13.8 | $ | 26.1 | $ | 18.8 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 76.5 | ||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 214.8 | $ | 10,883.1 | $ | 6,963.3 | $ | 6,055.7 | $ | 2,305.4 | $ | 26,422.3 |
25
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
(All amounts in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Group | Annuities | Annuities | Life | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 108.8 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10.2 | $ | | $ | 119.0 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income |
4.6 | 107.8 | 104.0 | 66.1 | 4.4 | 286.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
2.9 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 29.1 | 3.5 | 40.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment gains on fixed index
annuity (FIA) options |
| 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
116.3 | 112.7 | 104.2 | 105.4 | 7.9 | 446.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
75.0 | 0.1 | | 11.1 | | 86.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest credited |
| 68.5 | 92.0 | 58.5 | (0.5 | ) | 218.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
23.7 | 13.6 | 5.3 | 12.7 | 4.3 | 59.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | 8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs |
1.9 | 13.2 | 0.5 | (0.2 | ) | | 15.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
100.6 | 95.4 | 97.8 | 82.1 | 11.8 | 387.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income
(loss) |
$ | 15.7 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 23.3 | $ | (3.9 | ) | $ | 58.8 | |||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 116.3 | $ | 112.7 | $ | 104.2 | $ | 105.4 | $ | 7.9 | $ | 446.5 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net realized investment gains
(losses), excluding FIA options |
(0.2 | ) | 3.0 | 4.7 | 0.2 | (1.0 | ) | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
116.1 | 115.7 | 108.9 | 105.6 | 6.9 | 453.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
100.6 | 95.4 | 97.8 | 82.1 | 11.8 | 387.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 15.5 | $ | 20.3 | $ | 11.1 | $ | 23.5 | $ | (4.9 | ) | $ | 65.5 | |||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 258.8 | $ | 8,809.0 | $ | 6,717.7 | $ | 5,226.4 | $ | 2,349.7 | $ | 23,361.6 |
12. Subsequent Events
On May 11, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.06 per common share, or approximately
$8.3 in total, to shareholders and warrant holders of record as of May 25, 2011. The dividend will
be paid on or about June 10, 2011.
26
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Our
actual results may differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any of the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those
listed under Forward-Looking Statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction
with the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying condensed notes
included in Item 1 Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, our Annual Report for the
year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2011 (2010 10-K), as well as our
current reports on Form 8-K and other publicly available information. Our fiscal year ends on
December 31 of each calendar year.
Management considers certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted operating income,
adjusted operating income per common share, adjusted book value, adjusted book value per common
share, adjusted book value per common share, as converted and operating ROAE to be useful to
investors in evaluating our financial performance and condition. These measures have been
reconciled to their most comparable GAAP financial measures. For a definition and further
discussion of these non-GAAP measures, see Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures in our 2010 10-K.
All amounts, except per share data, are in millions unless otherwise stated.
Overview
We are a financial services company in the life insurance industry focused on profitable
growth in selected group health, retirement, life insurance and employee benefits markets. Our
operations date back to 1957 and many of our agency and distribution relationships have been in
place for decades.
Our Operations
We manage our business through three divisions composed of four operating segments and one
non-operating segment:
Group Division
| Group. We offer medical stop-loss insurance, limited benefit medical plans, group life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance and disability income insurance mainly to employer groups of 50 to 5,000 individuals. In addition to our insurance products, we offer managing general underwriting, or MGU, services. |
Retirement Division
| Deferred Annuities. We offer fixed and variable deferred annuities to consumers who want to accumulate tax-deferred assets for retirement. | ||
| Income Annuities. We offer single premium immediate annuities, or SPIAs, to customers seeking a reliable source of retirement income or to protect against outliving their assets during retirement, and structured settlement annuities to fund third party personal injury settlements. In addition, we offer funding services options to existing structured settlement clients. |
Life Division
| Life. We offer a wide array of individual products such as term and universal life insurance, including single premium life insurance as well as bank-owned life insurance, or BOLI. |
Other
| Other. This segment consists of unallocated corporate income, composed primarily of investment income on unallocated surplus, unallocated corporate expenses, interest expense on debt, earnings related to our limited partnership interests, the results of small, non-insurance businesses that are managed outside of our divisions, and inter-segment elimination entries. |
See Note 11 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for
the financial results of our segments.
27
Table of Contents
Current Outlook
We have entered 2011 with positive momentum and an energized executive team that is focused on
growing and diversifying the Company. We are diversifying our product offerings to profitably grow
in a wider variety of economic environments. In April 2011, we launched a new fixed indexed annuity
product with certain banking and independent financial planning distribution partners. Also in
April 2011, we updated our single premium life product and brought in seasoned talent to expand our
life insurance product portfolio. To help with this effort, we have also been focused on expanding
our field sales force for life insurance and annuities. We also made progress in the first quarter
on expanding our group life business by hiring additional leadership for this initiative and
beginning to build an administrative infrastructure. As we focus on these and other efforts to
grow and diversify our business, the pace of the economic recovery may impact our ability to
effectively deploy capital.
The slow economic recovery experienced during 2010 continued at a slow pace during the first
quarter of 2011. Although interest rates have increased from the recent historic low levels, low
interest rate conditions and tight credit spreads continue to be a challenge for our asset-based
businesses. To mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this environment, such as spread
compression or instances where our returns on investments are not enough to support the interest
rate guarantees on the inforce business, we remain proactive in our investment and product
strategies, interest crediting strategies and overall asset-liability management practices.
The lack of supply of investments with attractive risk-return profiles and yields continues to
be a challenge as we try to invest cash. To improve our asset yield in this environment, we have
been and plan to continue increasing our investments in commercial mortgage loans. In addition, we
also plan to continue managing our cash levels through temporary investments in U.S. Treasury
securities until more permanent investments with attractive risk-return profiles can be acquired.
To navigate our way through this environment and provide profitable growth and long-term ROE
expansion to our shareholders, we continue to focus on the strategies outlined in our 2010 10-K.
Our focus in 2011 is on executing our strategic growth initiatives. We expect to organically deploy
some of our excess capital as we grow through sales of new and refreshed products. Sales of our
fixed deferred annuities in the first quarter of 2011 represented one of our highest quarters, and
we expect them to remain solid for the rest of 2011. However, fixed deferred annuity sales will
likely be at levels lower than the first quarter because we recently changed to a more level
crediting rate strategy on our most popular fixed deferred annuity, which we believe will improve
our positioning in a rising interest rate environment. In addition to organic growth, we will look
for acquisition opportunities that fit our strategies and help us drive improved earnings.
However, the success of these and other strategies may be affected by the factors discussed in Item
1A Risk Factors and other factors as discussed herein.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to adopt
accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. The following accounting policies are those we
consider to be particularly critical to understanding our financial statements because their
application places the most significant demands on our ability to judge the effect of inherently
uncertain matters on our financial results:
| The evaluation of OTTI of investments; | ||
| The valuation of investments at fair value; | ||
| The balance, recoverability and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs; and | ||
| The liabilities for future policy benefits and policy and contract claims. |
In applying the Companys accounting policies, management makes subjective and complex
judgments that frequently require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of
these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services
industries; others are specific to the Companys businesses and operations. For all of these
policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and our best estimates
may require adjustment.
There have been no material changes to the above critical accounting estimates, which are
described in Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Note 2 of the notes to the audited
financial statements included in the 2010 10-K.
28
Table of Contents
New Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2
in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
Sources of Revenues and Expenses
Our primary sources of revenues from our insurance operations are premiums and net investment
income. Our primary sources of expenses from our insurance operations are policyholder benefits and
claims, interest credited to policyholder reserves and account balances, and general business and
operating expenses, net of DAC. We allocate shared service operating expenses to each segment using
multiple factors, including employee headcount, allocated investments, account values and time
study results. We also generate net realized investment gains (losses) on sales or impairment of
our investments and changes in fair value on our equity trading portfolio.
Each of our four operating segments maintains its own portfolio of invested assets, which are
managed in accordance with specific guidelines. The net investment income and realized investment
gains (losses) are reported in the segment in which they occur. We also allocate surplus net
investment income to each segment using a risk-based capital formula. The unallocated portion of
net investment income is reported in the Other segment.
Revenues
Premiums
Premiums consist primarily of premiums from our medical stop-loss and individual term and
whole life insurance products.
Net investment income
Net investment income represents the income earned on our investments, net of investment
expenses, including gains or losses from changes in the fair value of our investments in private
equity fund limited partnerships. Further, we account for our investments in limited partnerships
that operate affordable housing projects and state tax credit funds under the equity method and
record them at amortized cost, with the amortization recorded as a decrease to net investment
income with an offsetting benefit to our income tax expense.
Policy fees, contract charges and other
Policy fees, contract charges and other includes cost of insurance (COI) charges on our
universal life insurance and BOLI policies, mortality expense, surrender and other administrative
charges to policyholders, revenues from our non-insurance businesses, and reinsurance allowance
fees.
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Net realized investment gains (losses) mainly consists of realized gains (losses) from sales
of our investments, realized losses from investment impairments and changes in fair value on our
trading portfolio and FIA options.
Benefits and Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims
Policyholder benefits and claims consist of benefits paid and reserve activity on medical
stop-loss and individual life products.
29
Table of Contents
Interest credited
Interest credited represents interest credited to policyholder reserves and contract holder
general account balances in addition to the impact of mortality and funding services activity
within our Income Annuities segment and the amortization of deferred sales inducement assets.
Other underwriting and operating expenses
Other underwriting and operating expenses represent non-deferrable costs related to the
acquisition and ongoing maintenance of insurance and investment contracts, including certain
non-deferrable commissions, policy issuance expenses and other business operating costs.
Interest expense
Interest expense primarily includes interest on corporate debt, the impact of interest rate
hedging activities on the debt and amortization of debt issuance costs.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
We defer as assets certain commissions, distribution costs and other underwriting costs, that
vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of new and renewal business. Amortization
of previously capitalized DAC is recorded as an expense.
Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures
Certain tables and related disclosures in this report include non-GAAP financial measures. We
believe these measures provide useful information to investors in evaluating our financial
performance or condition. The non-GAAP financial measures discussed below are not a substitute for
their most directly comparable GAAP measures. The adjustments made to derive these non-GAAP
measures are important to understanding our overall results of operations and financial position
and, if evaluated without proper context, these non-GAAP measures possess material limitations.
For a full discussion of each non-GAAP measure, see Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures in
our 2010 10-K.
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 2,431.0 | $ | 2,380.6 | ||||
Less: AOCI |
434.0 | 432.5 | ||||||
Adjusted book value* |
1,997.0 | 1,948.1 | ||||||
Add: Assumed proceeds from exercise of warrants |
218.1 | 218.1 | ||||||
Adjusted book value, as converted* |
$ | 2,215.1 | $ | 2,166.2 | ||||
Book value per common share (1) |
$ | 17.68 | $ | 17.35 | ||||
Adjusted book value per common share (2)* |
$ | 16.85 | $ | 16.48 | ||||
Adjusted book value per common share, as converted (3)* |
$ | 16.11 | $ | 15.79 | ||||
30
Table of Contents
For the Twelve Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Return on stockholders equity, or ROE |
8.8 | % | 9.3 | % | ||||
Net income (4) |
$ | 209.5 | $ | 200.9 | ||||
Average stockholders equity (5) |
2,367.5 | 2,167.9 | ||||||
Operating return on average equity, or ROAE* |
9.4 | % | 9.8 | % | ||||
Adjusted operating income (6)* |
$ | 178.4 | $ | 175.2 | ||||
Average adjusted book value (7)* |
1,898.2 | 1,795.4 |
* | Represents a non-GAAP measure. | |
(1) | Book value per common share is calculated as stockholders equity divided by outstanding common shares and shares subject to outstanding warrants totaling 137.511 and 137.192 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(2) | Adjusted book value per common share is calculated as adjusted book value divided by outstanding common shares totaling 118.535 and 118.216 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(3) | Adjusted book value per common share, as converted is calculated as adjusted book value plus the assumed proceeds from exercise of warrants, divided by outstanding common shares and shares subject to outstanding warrants totaling 137.511 and 137.192 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(4) | Net income for the most recent twelve months is used in the calculation of ROE. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, this consisted of quarterly net income of $54.9, $62.2, $56.6 and $35.8. | |
(5) | Ending stockholders equity balances for the most recent five quarters are used in the calculation of ROE. As of March 31, 2011, stockholders equity for the most recent five quarters was $2,431.0, $2,380.6, $2,711.3, $2,342.8, and $1,971.7. As of December 31, 2010, stockholders equity for the most recent five quarters was $2,380.6, $2,711.3, $2,342.8, $1,971.7, and $1,433.3. | |
(6) | Adjusted operating income for the most recent twelve months is used in the calculation of operating ROAE. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, this consisted of quarterly adjusted operating income of $45.1, $48.0, $43.8, and $41.5. Adjusted operating income consists of net income, less after-tax net realized gains, plus after-tax net realized and unrealized investment gains on our FIA options. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, this consisted of net quarterly reconciling amounts of $9.8, $14.2, $12.8, and $(5.7). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, this consisted of quarterly adjusted operating income of $48.0, $43.8, $41.5, and $41.9, and net quarterly reconciling amounts of $14.2, $12.8, $(5.7), and $4.4. | |
(7) | Ending adjusted book values for the most recent five quarters are used in the calculation of operating ROAE. Adjusted book value consists of stockholders equity, less AOCI. As of March 31, 2011, adjusted book value for the most recent five quarters was $1,997.0, $1,948.1, $1,891.9, $1,841.7, and $1,812.2. AOCI, for the most recent five quarters was $434.0, $432.5, $819.4, $501.1, and $159.5. As of December 31, 2010, adjusted book value of the most recent five quarters was $1,948.1, $1,891.9, $1,841.7, $1,812.2, and $1,483.0. AOCI, for the most recent five quarters was $432.5, $819.4, $501.1, $159.5, and $(49.7). |
31
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements and the related condensed notes.
Total Company
Set forth below is a summary of our consolidated financial results. The variances noted in the
total company and segment tables should be interpreted as increases or (decreases), respectively.
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 120.9 | $ | 119.0 | 1.6 | % | ||||||
Net investment income |
310.0 | 286.9 | 8.1 | |||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
44.7 | 40.5 | 10.4 | |||||||||
Net realized investment gains: |
||||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(0.9 | ) | (9.7 | ) | 90.7 | |||||||
Other net realized investment gains |
16.5 | 16.5 | | |||||||||
Total net realized investment gains |
15.6 | 6.8 | * | |||||||||
Total revenues |
491.2 | 453.2 | 8.4 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
92.3 | 86.2 | 7.1 | |||||||||
Interest credited |
228.3 | 218.5 | 4.5 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
66.0 | 59.6 | 10.7 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 8.0 | | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
20.1 | 15.4 | 30.5 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
414.7 | 387.7 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Income from operations before income taxes |
76.5 | 65.5 | 16.8 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Current |
11.2 | 9.9 | 13.1 | |||||||||
Deferred |
10.4 | 9.3 | 11.8 | |||||||||
Total provision for income taxes |
21.6 | 19.2 | 12.5 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | 18.6 | % | ||||||
Net income per common share(1): |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 | 14.3 | % | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.35 | 14.3 | |||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
137.292 | 131.018 | 4.8 | |||||||||
Diluted |
137.300 | 131.038 | 4.8 | |||||||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures: |
||||||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 45.1 | $ | 41.9 | 7.6 | % | ||||||
Adjusted operating income per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | 3.1 | % | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | 3.1 | |||||||
Reconciliation to net income: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54.9 | $ | 46.3 | 18.6 | |||||||
Less: Net realized investment gains (net of taxes of $5.5 and $2.3) |
10.1 | 4.5 | * | |||||||||
Add: Net investment gains on FIA options (net of taxes of $0.2 and $0.0) |
0.3 | 0.1 | * | |||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 45.1 | $ | 41.9 | 7.6 | % | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
32
Table of Contents
(1) | Basic and diluted net income per common share includes all participating securities, such as warrants and unvested restricted shares, based on the application of the two-class method. Diluted net income per common share also includes the dilutive impact of non-participating securities, to the extent dilutive, such as stock options and shares estimated to be issued under the employee stock purchase plan, based on application of the treasury stock method. Antidilutive awards were excluded from the computation of dilutive net income per share. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Net income increased $8.6 as a result of an increase in adjusted operating income and net
realized investment gains. Adjusted operating income increased $3.2, which was primarily driven by
a $9.5 increase in the investment margin (net investment income less interest credited) in our
Deferred Annuities and Income Annuities segments. In addition, improvements in our Life segments
BOLI return on assets (ROA) increased earnings $2.4 and we saw improvement in our Group segments
loss ratio. These favorable drivers were partially offset by a $6.4 increase in other underwriting
and operating expenses primarily driven by increased employee-related expenses, and a first quarter
2010 reserve release causing a reduction in benefits and expenses in our Life segment.
Net realized investment gains increased $8.8, to $15.6 from $6.8. This was primarily driven by
a reduction in impairments, which were $0.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared
to $9.7 for the same period in 2010, an improvement of $8.8. For further discussion of our
investment results and portfolio refer to Investments below.
The provision for income taxes increased $2.4 primarily due to higher income from operations
before income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to the same period in
2010. The increase in the provision was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate,
which was 28.3% and 29.3%, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
reduction in the effective tax rate was primarily due to an increase in low income housing tax
credits.
Further discussion of adjusted operating income drivers described above:
Our Group segments profitability decreased $1.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same period in 2010, which was primarily due to higher other underwriting and
operating expenses. The Group loss ratio improved to 67.6% for the three months ended March 31,
2011 from 68.9% for the same period in 2010 on slightly increased premiums, which partially offset
the increase in other underwriting and operating expenses.
Our Deferred Annuities segments investment margin increased $6.2 and DAC amortization
increased on a $1.8 billion increase in our fixed account values, driven by strong sales over the
past twelve months. In addition, we deployed more cash on average, as we held lower daily average
cash balances over the prior period. This was partially offset by a lower interest spread due to
decreased investment yields as a result of a lower interest rate environment in addition to lower
targeted spreads on new sales over the past twelve months as a result of lowering new product
acquisition costs and guarantees.
Our Income Annuities segments investment margin increased, primarily due to an increase in
the interest spread and favorable mortality. The increase in the interest spread was driven by
higher investment yields due in part to favorable prepayment speed adjustments on mortgage-backed
securities which were $1.8 during the first quarter 2011, compared to $(0.2) for the same period in
2010 and the positive effects of our commercial mortgage loan investment strategy. Mortality gains
were $0.7 during the first quarter 2011, compared to mortality losses of $(0.1) for the same period
in 2010.
Our Life segments pre-tax adjusted operating income decreased primarily due to a first
quarter 2010 $7.4 reserve release related to one of our UL products, which resulted in a reduction
in benefits and expenses, and a $1.8 increase in Individual life claims. This was partially offset
by an increase in the BOLI ROA, which increased earnings $2.4 driven by higher net investment
income and favorable claims experience.
Division Operating Results
The results of operations and selected operating metrics for our five segments, (Group,
Deferred Annuities, Income Annuities, Life and Other), for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 are set forth in the following respective sections.
33
Table of Contents
Group
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Group segment:
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 110.0 | $ | 108.8 | 1.1 | % | ||||||
Net investment income |
4.2 | 4.6 | (8.7 | ) | ||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
3.3 | 2.9 | 13.8 | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
117.5 | 116.3 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
74.3 | 75.0 | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
27.3 | 23.7 | 15.2 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
2.1 | 1.9 | 10.5 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
103.7 | 100.6 | 3.1 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 13.8 | $ | 15.7 | (12.1 | )% | ||||||
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Group segment as of, or for the three months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Group loss ratio(1) |
67.6 | % | 68.9 | % | ||||
Expense ratio(2) |
25.9 | % | 23.1 | % | ||||
Combined ratio(3) |
93.5 | % | 92.0 | % | ||||
Medical stop-loss loss ratio(4) |
69.3 | % | 70.1 | % | ||||
Total sales(5) |
$ | 48.7 | $ | 41.4 |
(1) | Group loss ratio represents policyholder benefits and claims incurred divided by premiums earned. | |
(2) | Expense ratio is equal to other underwriting and operating expenses of our insurance operations and amortization of DAC divided by premiums earned. | |
(3) | Combined ratio is equal to the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio. | |
(4) | Medical stop-loss loss ratio represents medical stop-loss policyholder benefits and incurred claims divided by medical stop-loss premiums earned. | |
(5) | Total sales represents annualized first-year premiums net of first year policy lapses. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income decreased $1.9, primarily the result of higher other
underwriting and operating expenses. This was partially offset by an improved loss ratio. For first
quarter 2011, the loss ratio was 67.6%, down from 68.9% for the same period in 2010, which was
driven by a focus on pricing discipline during our 2010 renewals. Our first quarter 2011 results
included a higher frequency of large claims. On a quarter-to-quarter basis, the loss ratio can
fluctuate widely.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Benefits and Expenses
The $3.6 increase in other underwriting and operating expenses was primarily the result of
higher commissions on strong sales and improved profits, and higher employee-related expenses,
compared with unusually low administrative expenses in first quarter 2010.
34
Table of Contents
Deferred Annuities
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Deferred Annuities
segment:
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 123.1 | $ | 107.8 | 14.2 | % | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
5.1 | 4.8 | 6.3 | |||||||||
Net investment gains on FIA options |
0.5 | 0.1 | * | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
128.7 | 112.7 | 14.2 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
(0.1 | ) | 0.1 | * | ||||||||
Interest credited |
77.6 | 68.5 | 13.3 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
12.4 | 13.6 | (8.8 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
15.6 | 13.2 | 18.2 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
105.5 | 95.4 | 10.6 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 23.2 | $ | 17.3 | 34.1 | % | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Deferred Annuities segment as of, or for the three months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Account values Fixed annuities |
$ | 9,793.9 | $ | 8,005.4 | ||||
Account values Variable annuities |
809.2 | 768.0 | ||||||
Interest spread on average account values(1) |
1.82 | % | 1.86 | % | ||||
Total sales(2) |
$ | 618.4 | $ | 377.5 |
(1) | Interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate to policyholders. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets in the general account attributed to the segment. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on policyholder fixed account values within the segment. Interest credited is subject to contractual terms, including minimum guarantees. | |
(2) | Total sales represent deposits for new policies net of first year policy lapses and/or surrenders. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $5.9, primarily driven by a $6.2 increase
in the investment margin offset by a $2.4 increase in DAC amortization from higher account values
driven by strong sales over the past 12 months. In addition, we carried lower cash balances.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Operating Revenues
Net investment income increased $15.3, which was driven by a $1.8 billion increase in average
invested assets from increased fixed annuities account values. Average daily cash balances
decreased $64.4 to $113.2 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $177.6 for the same period in
2010.
35
Table of Contents
Benefits and Expenses
Interest credited increased $9.1, which is primarily due to a $1.8 billion increase in fixed
annuities account values.
Income Annuities
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Income Annuities
segment:
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 105.0 | $ | 104.0 | 1.0 | % | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
0.2 | 0.2 | | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
105.2 | 104.2 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest credited |
89.7 | 92.0 | (2.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
5.9 | 5.3 | 11.3 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
0.7 | 0.5 | 40.0 | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
96.3 | 97.8 | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 8.9 | $ | 6.4 | 39.1 | % | ||||||
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our
Income Annuities segment as of, or for the three months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Reserves(1) |
$ | 6,681.4 | $ | 6,726.7 | ||||
Interest spread on reserves(2) |
0.58 | % | 0.41 | % | ||||
Mortality gains (losses)(3) |
$ | 0.7 | $ | (0.1 | ) | |||
Prepayment speed adjustment on mortgage-backed securities(4) |
1.8 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Total sales(5) |
64.5 | 66.3 |
(1) | Reserves represent the present value of future income annuity benefits and assumed expenses, discounted by the assumed interest rate. This metric represents the amount of our in-force book of business. | |
(2) | Interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate on policyholder reserves. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets, excluding equities, in the general account attributed to the segment. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on policyholder reserves and excludes the gains and losses from funding services and mortality. | |
(3) | Mortality gains (losses) represent the difference between actual and expected reserves released on our life contingent annuities. | |
(4) | Prepayment speed adjustment on mortgage-backed securities is the impact to net investment income due to the change in prepayment speeds on the underlying collateral of mortgage-backed securities. | |
(5) | Sales represent deposits for new policies net of first year policy lapses and/or surrenders. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income increased $2.5 primarily due to a $3.3 increase in
the investment margin on an increased interest spread and mortality gains of $0.7 during first
quarter 2011 compared to losses of $0.1 during first quarter 2010. Our interest spread primarily
increased due to favorable prepayment speed adjustments and the positive effects of our commercial
mortgage loan investment strategy, which delivered higher yields relative to other types of
investments. We are focused on improving our yield by increasing mortgage loan originations, which
currently offer attractive yields. Reserves, while relatively stable, fell slightly as benefit
payments exceeded deposits and interest credited.
36
Table of Contents
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Benefits and Expenses
Interest credited decreased $2.3 driven primarily by a reduction in interest credited due to
slightly lower reserves and favorable mortality experience as we experienced mortality gains of
$0.7 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to losses of $(0.1) in the first quarter of 2010.
Life
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Life segment:
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Premiums |
$ | 10.9 | $ | 10.2 | 6.9 | % | ||||||
Net investment income |
71.2 | 66.1 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
30.7 | 29.1 | 5.5 | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
112.8 | 105.4 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims |
18.1 | 11.1 | 63.1 | |||||||||
Interest credited |
61.7 | 58.5 | 5.5 | |||||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
14.4 | 12.7 | 13.4 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
1.7 | (0.2 | ) | * | ||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
95.9 | 82.1 | 16.8 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income |
$ | 16.9 | $ | 23.3 | (27.5 | )% | ||||||
* | Represents percentage variances that are not meaningful or are explained through the discussion of other variances. |
The following table sets forth selected historical operating metrics relating to our Life
segment as of, or for the three months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Individual insurance: |
||||||||
Individual insurance in force(1) |
$ | 37,689.0 | $ | 38,640.5 | ||||
Individual claims(2) |
15.7 | 13.9 | ||||||
UL account value(3) |
617.3 | 585.3 | ||||||
UL interest spread (4) |
1.59 | % | 1.37 | % | ||||
Individual sales(5) |
$ | 2.4 | $ | 2.8 | ||||
BOLI: |
||||||||
BOLI insurance in force(1) |
$ | 12,681.3 | $ | 11,416.0 | ||||
BOLI account value (3) |
4,403.0 | 3,853.2 | ||||||
BOLI ROA (6) |
1.14 | % | 1.08 | % | ||||
BOLI sales (7) |
$ | | $ | 2.7 |
(1) | Insurance in force represents dollar face amounts of policies. | |
(2) | Individual claims represents incurred claims on our term and universal life policies. | |
(3) | UL account value and BOLI account value represent our liabilities to our policyholders. |
37
Table of Contents
(4) | UL interest spread is the difference between net investment yield earned and the credited interest rate to policyholders. The investment yield is the approximate yield on invested assets in the general account attributed to the UL policies. The credited interest rate is the approximate rate credited on UL policyholder fixed account values. Interest credited to UL policyholders account values is subject to contractual terms, including minimum guarantees. Interest credited tends to move gradually over time to reflect actions by management to respond to competitive pressures and profit targets. The 2010 first quarter credited rate to policyholders was adjusted to exclude a reserve adjustment related to a persistency bonus. Without this adjustment the 2010 first quarter UL interest spread of 1.37% would have been 5.40%. | |
(5) | Individual sales represents annualized first year premiums for recurring premium products, and 10% of new single premium deposits net of first year policy lapses and/or surrenders. | |
(6) | BOLI ROA is a measure of the gross margin on our BOLI book of business. This metric is calculated as the difference between our BOLI revenue earnings rate and our BOLI policy benefits rate. The revenue earnings rate is calculated as revenues divided by average invested assets. The policy benefits rate is calculated as total policy benefits divided by average account value. The policy benefits used in this metric do not include expenses. | |
(7) | BOLI sales represent 10% of new BOLI total deposits. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating income decreased $6.4 primarily due to a first quarter 2010
$7.4 reserve release causing a reduction in benefits and expenses, discussed in further detail
below, and a $1.8 increase in Individual claims. These were partially offset by a $2.4 increase in
BOLI profitability driven by a higher BOLI ROA, primarily a result of a growing block of business.
In addition to the drivers discussed above, we consider the following information regarding
operating revenues and benefits and expenses useful in understanding our results.
Operating Revenues
Net investment income increased $5.1 as both UL and BOLI account values grew from sales in the
past twelve months, and a $0.8 increase from prepayment speed adjustments and fees. These were
partially offset by lower yields in the first quarter of 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
The reduction in yields was driven by lower yields on asset purchases over the past twelve months
and the impact of carrying higher levels of cash.
Benefits and Expenses
Due to the continued low interest rate environment in 2010, the credited interest rate on a
universal life product was adjusted downward to the guaranteed minimum rate. For this product,
bonus interest is not earned if the credited rate equals the guaranteed minimum. As a result,
during the first quarter of 2010, we released bonus interest reserves of $6.0 recorded in
policyholder benefits and claims, benefited from a $1.7 reduction in DAC amortization due to the
unlocking of future assumptions and recorded a $(0.3) adjustment to policy fees, contract charges
and other.
Excluding the effects of this reserve release, our benefit related expenses (policyholder
benefits and claims, and interest credited) increased $4.2. This was driven by higher interest
credited on increased BOLI account values, partially offset by favorable BOLI claims experience. In
addition, we had higher Individual claims in the first quarter of 2011, compared to the same period
in 2010.
38
Table of Contents
Other
The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Other segment:
Three Months Ended | QTD | |||||||||||
March 31, | Variance (%) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ | 6.5 | $ | 4.4 | 47.7 | % | ||||||
Policy fees, contract charges, and other |
5.4 | 3.5 | 54.3 | |||||||||
Total operating revenues |
11.9 | 7.9 | 50.6 | |||||||||
Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest credited |
(0.7 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (40.0 | ) | ||||||
Other underwriting and operating expenses |
6.0 | 4.3 | 39.5 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
8.0 | 8.0 | | |||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
13.3 | 11.8 | 12.7 | |||||||||
Segment pre-tax adjusted operating loss |
$ | (1.4 | ) | $ | (3.9 | ) | 64.1 | % | ||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Summary of Results
Our Other segment reported pre-tax adjusted operating losses of $1.4 for the first quarter of
2011 compared with losses of $3.9 for the same period in 2010. This reduction in losses was due
primarily to an increase in investment income from increased average invested assets. The IPO
proceeds received during the first quarter of 2010 were initially invested in cash and ultimately
invested in higher yielding assets over a period of time. In addition, broker-dealer revenues
increased $1.8 as a result of increased production. This is offset by a $1.5 increase in other
underwriting and operating expenses from broker-dealer related commissions.
Investments
Our investment portfolio is structured with the objective of supporting the expected cash
flows of our liabilities and producing stable returns over the long term. The composition of our
portfolio reflects our asset management philosophy of protecting principal and receiving
appropriate reward for risk. Our investment portfolio mix as of March 31, 2011 consisted in large
part of high quality fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans, as well as a smaller
allocation of high yield fixed maturities, marketable equity securities, investments in limited
partnerships (primarily tax credit investments and private equity funds) and other investments. We
believe that prudent levels of investments in marketable equity securities within our investment
portfolio offer enhanced long term, after-tax total returns to support a portion of our longest
duration liabilities.
The following table presents the composition of our investment portfolio:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Public |
$ | 20,919.1 | 86.4 | % | $ | 20,388.9 | 86.8 | % | ||||||||
Private |
866.3 | 3.6 | 892.9 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale(1) |
46.4 | 0.2 | 45.1 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading(2) |
224.7 | 0.9 | 189.3 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
1,862.0 | 7.7 | 1,713.0 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Policy loans |
70.4 | 0.3 | 71.5 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships(3): |
||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
34.9 | 0.1 | 36.5 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Tax credit investments |
163.9 | 0.7 | 150.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Other invested assets |
12.8 | 0.1 | 12.6 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24,200.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 23,500.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Amount primarily represents non-redeemable preferred stock. |
39
Table of Contents
(2) | Amount represents investments in common stock. | |
(3) | Investments in private equity funds are carried at fair value, while our limited partnership interests related to tax credit investments are carried at amortized cost. |
The increase in invested assets during the first three months of 2011 is primarily due to
portfolio growth generated by sales of fixed deferred annuities and BOLI during the preceding
twelve months.
Investment Returns
Net Investment Income
Return on invested assets is an important element of our financial results. The following
table sets forth the income yield and net investment income, excluding realized investment gains
(losses) for each major investment category:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Yield(1) | Amount | Yield(1) | Amount | |||||||||||||
Types of Investments |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
5.55 | % | $ | 286.7 | 5.76 | % | $ | 271.0 | ||||||||
Marketable equity securities, available-for-sale |
4.44 | 0.6 | 4.43 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities, trading |
2.10 | 0.9 | 1.68 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans, net |
6.22 | 27.9 | 6.17 | 18.8 | ||||||||||||
Policy loans |
5.73 | 1.0 | 5.99 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Investments in limited partnerships: |
||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
8.25 | 0.7 | 11.70 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Tax credit investments(2) |
(6.68 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (6.96 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||
Other income producing assets(3) |
1.52 | 1.3 | 0.89 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Gross investment income before investment expenses |
5.42 | 315.8 | 5.58 | 292.1 | ||||||||||||
Investment expenses |
(0.10 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (5.2 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income |
5.32 | % | $ | 310.0 | 5.48 | % | $ | 286.9 | ||||||||
(1) | Yields are determined based on monthly averages calculated using beginning and end-of-period balances. Yields are based on carrying values except for fixed maturities and equity securities, and private equity funds. Yields for fixed maturities and private equity funds are based on amortized cost. Yields for equity securities are based on cost. | |
(2) | The negative yield from tax credit investments is offset by U.S. federal income tax benefits. The resulting overall impact to net income was $2.1 and $1.5 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. | |
(3) | Other income producing assets includes income from other invested assets, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net investment income increased 8.1%
compared to the same period in 2010, driven by an increase in invested assets on strong
sales of our fixed deferred annuities in 2010 and the first quarter of 2011. In addition, income
from mortgage loans increased as we continue to grow our mortgage loan portfolio. The income
increase driven by growth in invested assets was partially offset by a decrease in the total net
investment yield, which decreased to 5.32% in 2011 from 5.48% in 2010. The
reduction in yields is the effect of the low interest rate environment in 2010 and 2011 as overall
yields on purchases were 100 basis points lower than the average yield on existing investments.
Although first quarter 2011 yields included 5 basis points of income related to the prepayment
speed adjustment on mortgage-backed securities, the effect of the low interest rate environment
drove overall investment yields down year over year.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, and 2010 the Company had average daily
cash and cash equivalent balances of $244.1 and $368.3, respectively. The decrease in average daily
cash balances is primarily attributable to a slight improvement in the credit markets, and our
strategy to temporarily invest in treasury securities as we look for high quality, higher yielding
investments. In the first quarter of 2010, we received proceeds from our initial public offering,
which resulted in a higher average daily cash and cash equivalents balance.
40
Table of Contents
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
In the first quarter 2011, our portfolio produced net realized gains of $15.6, as compared to
net realized gains of $6.8 for the same period in 2010, primarily due to a reduction in
impairments. In the first quarter of 2011, equity markets continued to rebound which led to net
gains on our trading securities for the quarter, outpacing net gains on our trading portfolio for
the first quarter of 2010, as illustrated in the following table. These realized gains were offset
by higher realized losses on sales of fixed maturities driven by the opportunistic sale of a few
distressed bonds.
The following table sets forth the detail of our net realized investment gains (losses) before
taxes:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Gross realized gains on sales of fixed maturities |
$ | 2.7 | $ | 10.4 | ||||
Gross realized losses on sales of fixed maturities |
(6.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||
Impairments: |
||||||||
Public fixed maturities(1) |
(0.4 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||
Private fixed maturities |
| (5.1 | ) | |||||
Total credit-related |
(0.4 | ) | (7.5 | ) | ||||
Other |
(0.5 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||
Total impairments |
(0.9 | ) | (9.7 | ) | ||||
Net gains on trading securities |
12.2 | 7.6 | ||||||
Other net investment gains (losses)(2): |
||||||||
Other gross gains |
10.0 | 3.8 | ||||||
Other gross losses |
(2.3 | ) | (4.2 | ) | ||||
Net realized investment gains before taxes |
$ | 15.6 | $ | 6.8 | ||||
(1) | Public fixed maturities includes publicly traded securities and highly marketable private placements for which there is an actively traded market. | |
(2) | This primarily consists of changes in fair value on derivatives instruments, gains (losses) on calls and redemptions, and the impact of net realized investment gains (losses) on DAC and deferred sales inducements. |
Impairments
Impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $0.9 and $9.7,
respectively. This decrease was primarily attributable to reduced credit concerns as credit-related
impairments decreased $7.1. For those issuers in which we recorded an impairment during 2011, we
had remaining holdings with an amortized cost of $10.7 and a fair value of $10.7 as of March 31,
2011. When evaluating a security for possible impairment, we consider several factors, which are
described in more detail in Note 4 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements.
Fixed Maturity Securities
Fixed maturities represented approximately 90% and 91% of invested assets as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, publicly traded and privately placed
fixed maturities represented 96.0% and 4.0%, respectively, of our total fixed maturity portfolio at
fair value. We invest in privately placed fixed maturities to enhance the overall value of the
portfolio, increase diversification and obtain higher yields than can ordinarily be obtained with
comparable public market securities.
Fixed Maturity Securities Credit Quality
The Securities Valuation Office, or SVO, of the NAIC, evaluates the investments of insurers
for regulatory reporting purposes and assigns fixed maturities to one of the six categories called
NAIC Designations. NAIC designations of 1 or 2 include fixed maturities considered investment
grade, which generally include securities rated BBB- or higher by Standard & Poors. NAIC
designations of 3 through 6 are referred to as below investment grade, which generally include
securities rated BB+ or lower by Standard & Poors.
41
Table of Contents
The following table presents our fixed maturities by NAIC designation and S&P equivalent
credit ratings, as well as the percentage of total fixed maturities, based upon fair value that
each designation comprises:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | % of Total | Amortized | Fair | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Fair Value | Cost | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
NAIC: | S&P Equivalent: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AAA, AA, A |
$ | 12,577.6 | $ | 13,141.0 | 60.3 | % | $ | 12,453.2 | $ | 13,042.4 | 61.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2 | BBB |
6,962.1 | 7,306.9 | 33.6 | 6,642.1 | 6,981.9 | 32.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total investment grade |
19,539.7 | 20,447.9 | 93.9 | 19,095.3 | 20,024.3 | 94.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | BB |
728.8 | 719.5 | 3.3 | 700.3 | 679.0 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | B |
477.9 | 462.7 | 2.1 | 420.6 | 393.8 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | CCC & lower |
156.5 | 146.6 | 0.7 | 178.4 | 164.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | In or near default |
8.2 | 8.7 | | 21.9 | 19.9 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total below investment grade |
1,371.4 | 1,337.5 | 6.1 | 1,321.2 | 1,257.5 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 20,911.1 | $ | 21,785.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,416.5 | $ | 21,281.8 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities with an amortized cost of $819.9
and $847.3, and fair value of $869.0 and $891.9, respectively, had no rating from a nationally
recognized securities rating agency. We derived the equivalent S&P credit quality rating for these
securities based on the securities NAIC rating designation.
Below investment grade securities comprised 6.1% and 5.9% of our fixed maturities portfolio as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We had NAIC 5 and 6 designated securities
with gross unrealized losses of $16.5 as of March 31, 2011, of which $14.8, or 89.7%, related to
three issuers. These issuers are current on their contractual payments and our analysis supports
the recoverability of amortized cost.
Certain of our fixed maturities are supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers. The
credit ratings of our fixed maturities set forth in the table above reflect, where applicable, the
guarantees provided by monoline bond insurers. As of March 31, 2011, fixed maturities with monoline
guarantees had an amortized cost of $551.5 and a fair value of $543.8, with gross unrealized losses
of $17.5. As of December 31, 2010, fixed maturities with monoline guarantees had an amortized cost
of $555.1 and a fair value of $547.5, with gross unrealized losses of $19.3. The majority of these
securities were municipal bonds. As of March 31, 2011, $513.3, or 94.4%, of the fair value of
fixed maturities supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers had investment grade credit
ratings both when including and excluding the effect of the monoline insurance.
42
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity Securities and Unrealized Gains and Losses by Security Sector
The following table sets forth the fair value of our fixed maturities by sector, as well as
the associated gross unrealized gains and losses and the percentage of total fixed maturities that
each sector comprises as of the dates indicated:
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Total Fair | OTTI | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | in AOCI | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Sector |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer discretionary |
$ | 1,625.7 | $ | 70.9 | $ | (14.5 | ) | $ | 1,682.1 | 7.7 | % | $ | (1.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer staples |
2,271.1 | 139.4 | (18.8 | ) | 2,391.7 | 11.0 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Energy |
668.5 | 46.9 | (4.4 | ) | 711.0 | 3.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Financials |
2,027.8 | 75.0 | (59.6 | ) | 2,043.2 | 9.4 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Health care |
1,243.2 | 88.5 | (6.7 | ) | 1,325.0 | 6.1 | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
2,545.1 | 173.0 | (14.7 | ) | 2,703.4 | 12.4 | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Information technology |
451.6 | 41.5 | (1.6 | ) | 491.5 | 2.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Materials |
1,231.5 | 65.5 | (22.7 | ) | 1,274.3 | 5.8 | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Telecommunication services |
573.8 | 30.0 | (7.8 | ) | 596.0 | 2.7 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,706.3 | 90.0 | (17.6 | ) | 1,778.7 | 8.2 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total corporate securities |
14,344.6 | 820.7 | (168.4 | ) | 14,996.9 | 68.9 | (18.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
154.8 | 2.8 | (0.9 | ) | 156.7 | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
471.2 | 5.3 | (13.7 | ) | 462.8 | 2.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
3,275.3 | 125.5 | (21.9 | ) | 3,378.9 | 15.5 | | |||||||||||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime |
327.0 | 9.7 | (9.2 | ) | 327.5 | 1.5 | (30.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A |
108.8 | 4.9 | (4.8 | ) | 108.9 | 0.5 | (8.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total residential mortgage-backed
securities |
3,711.1 | 140.1 | (35.9 | ) | 3,815.3 | 17.5 | (39.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,706.6 | 108.1 | (11.8 | ) | 1,802.9 | 8.3 | (3.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
522.8 | 34.9 | (6.9 | ) | 550.8 | 2.5 | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,911.1 | $ | 1,111.9 | $ | (237.6 | ) | $ | 21,785.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | (66.0 | ) | ||||||||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we increased our investments in corporate
securities with cash generated from sales, primarily of fixed deferred annuities. We have mainly
purchased new issues of investment grade corporate securities, with a focus on obtaining
appropriate yields and duration to match our policyholder liabilities while retaining quality.
Our fixed maturities holdings are diversified by industry and issuer. The portfolio does not
have significant exposure to any single issuer. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
fair value of our ten largest corporate securities holdings was $1,298.9 and $1,276.9, or 8.7% and
8.8%, respectively. The fair value of our largest exposure to a single issuer of corporate
securities was $162.7, or 1.1%, as of March 31, 2011. All of the securities related to this issuer
have an NAIC rating of 2 or higher. As of December 31, 2010, the fair value of our largest exposure
to a single issuer of corporate securities was $140.4, or 1.0%, all of which had an NAIC rating of
2 or higher. As of March 31, 2011, we had $1.3 in direct exposure to the sovereign and local debt
of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain.
43
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Gross | Gross | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Total Fair | OTTI | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | in AOCI | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Sector |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer discretionary |
$ | 1,526.6 | $ | 77.4 | $ | (15.0 | ) | $ | 1,589.0 | 7.4 | % | $ | (2.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer staples |
2,085.3 | 145.9 | (15.1 | ) | 2,216.1 | 10.4 | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Energy |
675.5 | 49.1 | (4.3 | ) | 720.3 | 3.4 | | |||||||||||||||||
Financials |
2,028.9 | 68.7 | (83.9 | ) | 2,013.7 | 9.5 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Health care |
1,218.9 | 99.6 | (6.2 | ) | 1,312.3 | 6.2 | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Industrials |
2,446.8 | 176.4 | (19.6 | ) | 2,603.6 | 12.2 | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Information technology |
450.9 | 40.2 | (1.7 | ) | 489.4 | 2.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Materials |
1,176.7 | 64.8 | (30.6 | ) | 1,210.9 | 5.7 | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Telecommunication services |
569.3 | 32.6 | (10.1 | ) | 591.8 | 2.8 | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
1,712.8 | 100.6 | (19.1 | ) | 1,794.3 | 8.4 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total corporate securities |
13,891.7 | 855.3 | (205.6 | ) | 14,541.4 | 68.3 | (26.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agencies |
30.3 | 2.8 | | 33.1 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
462.9 | 5.3 | (15.4 | ) | 452.8 | 2.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
3,239.9 | 139.3 | (18.6 | ) | 3,360.6 | 15.8 | | |||||||||||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime |
351.6 | 6.1 | (28.0 | ) | 329.7 | 1.5 | (31.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A |
115.7 | 3.5 | (7.9 | ) | 111.3 | 0.5 | (8.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total residential mortgage-backed
securities |
3,707.2 | 148.9 | (54.5 | ) | 3,801.6 | 17.8 | (40.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,782.2 | 115.2 | (10.1 | ) | 1,887.3 | 8.9 | (3.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations |
542.2 | 35.8 | (12.4 | ) | 565.6 | 2.7 | (6.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,416.5 | $ | 1,163.3 | $ | (298.0 | ) | $ | 21,281.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | (76.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Fixed Maturity Securities by Contractual Maturity Date
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 26% and 27% of the fair value of our
fixed maturity portfolio was held in mortgaged-backed securities, and 23% and 24% of our portfolio
was due after ten years, which we consider to be longer duration assets. Fixed maturities in these
categories primarily back long duration reserves in our Income Annuities segment, which can exceed
a period of 30 years. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 71% and 75%,
respectively, of the gross unrealized losses on our investment portfolio related to these longer
duration assets, which fluctuate more significantly with changes in interest rates and credit
spreads.
Mortgage-Backed Securities
As of March 31, 2011, our fixed maturity securities portfolio included $5.6 billion of
residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities at fair value. Approximately 70% of these
securities are agency securities and approximately 21% are AAA rated non-agency securities in the
most senior tranche of the structure type.
All of our RMBS and CMBS securities have prepayment options. Prepayments that vary in amount
or timing from our estimates cause fluctuations in our yields due to an acceleration or
deceleration of unamortized premium or discount associated with the securities in our portfolio.
Such adjustment is recorded in net investment income in our results of operations. These
adjustments, which relate primarily to RMBS, create volatility in our net investment income. Refer
to the RMBS section below for additional discussion.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS)
We classify our investments in RMBS as agency, prime, Alt-A, and subprime. Agency RMBS are
guaranteed or otherwise supported by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation, or the Government National Mortgage Association. Prime RMBS are loans to
the most credit-worthy customers with high quality credit profiles. Alt-A RMBS
44
Table of Contents
have overall credit quality between prime and subprime, based on a review of their underlying
mortgage loans and factors such as credit scores and financial ratios.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Companys investment in agency, prime,
and Alt-A RMBS and the percentage of total invested assets they represent:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
% of Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Invested Assets | Fair Value | Invested Assets | |||||||||||||
Agency |
$ | 3,378.9 | 14.0 | % | $ | 3,360.6 | 14.3 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency: |
||||||||||||||||
Prime |
327.5 | 1.4 | 329.7 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Alt-A |
108.9 | 0.4 | 111.3 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal non-agency |
436.4 | 1.8 | 441.0 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,815.3 | 15.8 | % | $ | 3,801.6 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the total fair value, and amortized cost of our non-agency
RMBS by credit quality and year of origination (vintage). There were seven securities with a total
amortized cost and fair value of $77.7 and $70.6, respectively, that were rated below investment
grade by either Moodys, S&P or Fitch, while at least one other agency rated them investment
grade.
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Total | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 34.4 | $ | 34.4 | $ | 41.1 | ||||||||||||||
2006 |
| | | 5.3 | 111.2 | 116.5 | 127.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
| 9.2 | 7.4 | 56.1 | 39.5 | 112.2 | 115.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 and prior |
158.7 | 13.4 | | | 0.6 | 172.7 | 183.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortized cost |
$ | 158.7 | $ | 22.6 | $ | 7.4 | $ | 61.4 | $ | 185.7 | $ | 435.8 | $ | 467.3 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
3.0 | (2.6 | ) | 0.1 | (3.5 | ) | 3.6 | 0.6 | (26.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total fair value |
$ | 161.7 | $ | 20.0 | $ | 7.5 | $ | 57.9 | $ | 189.3 | $ | 436.4 | $ | 441.0 | ||||||||||||||
On a fair value basis as of March 31, 2011, our Alt-A portfolio was 85.8% fixed rate
collateral and 14.2% hybrid adjustable rate mortgages, or ARMs, with no exposure to option ARMs.
Generally, fixed rate mortgages have performed better with lower delinquencies and defaults on the
underlying collateral than both option ARMs and hybrid ARMs in the current economic environment. As
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, $63.9, or 58.7%, and $62.6, or 56.2%, of the
total Alt-A portfolio had an S&P equivalent credit rating of AAA.
As of March 31, 2011, our Alt-A, prime and total non-agency RMBS had an estimated
weighted-average credit enhancement of 13.5%, 8.5% and 9.8%, respectively. Credit enhancement
refers to the weighted-average percentage of the outstanding capital structure that is subordinate
in the priority of cash flows and absorbs losses first. We monitor delinquency rates associated
with these securities, and as of March 31, 2011, we believe that our credit enhancements are
sufficient to cover potential delinquencies.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 60.0% and 58.8%, respectively, of the fair value
of our non-agency RMBS had super senior subordination. The super senior class has priority over all
principal and interest cash flows and will not experience any loss of principal until lower levels
are written down to zero. Therefore, the majority of our RMBS investments have less exposure to
defaults and delinquencies in the underlying collateral than if we held the more subordinated
classes.
As of March 31, 2011, our RMBS had gross unamortized premiums and discounts of $72.9 and
$78.8, respectively. Changes in prepayment speeds, which are based on prepayment activity of the
underlying mortgages, create volatility in our net investment income because they accelerate or
decelerate our amortization of the unamortized premiums and discounts. The impact to net investment
income is dependent both on whether the securities are at a discount or premium and whether the
prepayment speeds increase or decrease.
45
Table of Contents
In our RMBS portfolio, certain vintage years have overall higher interest rates than current
market rates. Certain collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) in our RMBS portfolio with a
vintage year of 2003 and an average yield of 5.39% are creating the most volatility in our net
investment income. These securities are carried at an overall discount of $26.9 as of March 31,
2011. We recently experienced an overall increase in the underlying prepayment speeds of these
securities resulting in additional net investment income of $2.9 or 5 basis points in the first
quarter 2011. This additional income represented approximately 94% of our total prepayment speed
adjustment of $3.1. If prepayment speeds on these securities decelerate 50% in future periods, we
estimate an overall decrease in net investment income in the range of $3.0 to $4.5.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS)
The following table sets forth the fair value of our investment in CMBS and the percentage of
total invested assets they represent:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
% of Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Invested Assets | Fair Value | Invested Assets | |||||||||||||
Agency |
$ | 545.6 | 2.2 | % | $ | 607.4 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
Non-Agency |
1,257.3 | 5.2 | 1,279.9 | 5.4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,802.9 | 7.4 | % | $ | 1,887.3 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
The disruptions in the CMBS market that began in 2009 and continued through the first
quarter of 2011 were attributable to weakness in commercial real estate market fundamentals, and
previously reduced underwriting standards by some originators of commercial mortgage loans,
particularly within the more recent vintage years (2006 through 2008). This has reduced market
liquidity and availability of capital, increased market belief that default rates will increase,
and increased spreads and the repricing of risk, which impacted lower-quality CMBS the most. As a
result of the high concentrations of our portfolio in the most senior tranches, the spreads on our
non-agency CMBS have largely returned to levels seen prior to the market disruption. As of March
31, 2011, on an amortized cost basis, 97.4% of our entire CMBS portfolio were rated AAA, 1.3% were
rated AA or A, and 1.3% were rated B and below.
The following table sets forth the total fair value, and amortized cost of our non-agency CMBS
by credit quality and year of origination (vintage). There were 13 securities having a fair value
of $309.3 and an amortized cost of $286.4 that were rated A by S&P, while Moodys and/or Fitch
rated them AAA.
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highest Rating Agency Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB and | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA | AA | A | BBB | Below | Total | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 51.0 | $ | 18.5 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 69.5 | $ | 69.5 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
442.3 | | | | 1.3 | 443.6 | 444.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
157.5 | | | | 11.4 | 168.9 | 168.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
277.7 | | | | | 277.7 | 283.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 and prior |
197.0 | | 3.9 | | 9.5 | 210.4 | 224.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortized cost |
$ | 1,125.5 | $ | 18.5 | $ | 3.9 | $ | | $ | 22.2 | $ | 1,170.1 | $ | 1,190.8 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
93.3 | (2.3 | ) | | | (3.8 | ) | 87.2 | 89.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total fair value |
$ | 1,218.8 | $ | 16.2 | $ | 3.9 | $ | | $ | 18.4 | $ | 1,257.3 | $ | 1,279.9 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. CMBS securities have historically utilized a senior/subordinate credit structure to
allocate cash flows and losses. The structure was changed in late 2004 and was in transition into
early 2005 when fully implemented to include super-senior, mezzanine and junior AAA tranches. This
change resulted in increasing the credit enhancement (subordination) on the most senior tranche
(super-senior) to 30%. The mezzanine AAAs were structured to typically have 20% credit enhancement
and the junior AAAs 14% credit enhancement. Credit enhancement refers to the weighted-average
percentage of outstanding capital structure that is subordinate in the priority of cash flows and
absorbs losses first. Credit enhancement does not include any equity interest or property value in
46
Table of Contents
excess of outstanding debt. The super senior class has priority over the mezzanine and junior
classes to all principal and interest cash flows and will not experience any loss of principal
until both the entire mezzanine and junior tranches are written down to zero.
The following tables set forth the amortized cost of our AAA non-agency CMBS by type and year
of origination (vintage):
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total AAA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super Senior (Post 2004) | Other Structures (2005 and Prior) | Securities at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super | Other | Other | Amortized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior | Mezzanine | Junior | Senior | Subordinate | Other | Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 51.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 51.0 | ||||||||||||||
2007 |
442.3 | | | | | | 442.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
157.5 | | | | | | 157.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
134.7 | 29.7 | | 113.3 | | | 277.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 and prior |
| | | 168.5 | 28.5 | | 197.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 785.5 | $ | 29.7 | $ | | $ | 281.8 | $ | 28.5 | $ | | $ | 1,125.5 | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 787.0 | $ | 30.6 | $ | | $ | 298.3 | $ | 28.9 | $ | | $ | 1,144.8 | ||||||||||||||
As the table above indicates, our CMBS holdings are predominantly in the most senior
tranche of the structure type. As of March 31, 2011, on an amortized cost basis, 94.8% of our
AAA-rated CMBS were in the most senior tranche. The weighted-average credit enhancement of our CMBS
was 28.8% as of March 31, 2011. Adjusted to remove defeased loans, which are loans whose cash
flows have been replaced by U.S. Treasury securities, the weighted-average credit enhancement of
our CMBS as of March 31, 2011 was 30.2%. We believe this additional credit enhancement is
significant in a deep real estate downturn during which losses are expected to increase
substantially.
Return on Equity-Like Investments
Prospector Partners, LLC, or Prospector, manages a portfolio of equity and equity-like
investments, including publicly traded common stock and convertible securities. We believe that
these equity and equity-like investments are suitable for funding certain long duration liabilities
in our Income Annuities segment, and, on a limited basis, in our surplus portfolio. As of March 31,
2011 and 2010, convertible securities made up $85.1 or 28.3%, and $65.2 or 30.2% of the portfolio,
respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our convertible securities
yielded gross returns of 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively.
The following table compares our total gross return on the equity component of our Prospector
portfolio to the benchmark S&P 500 Total Return Index for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Common stock |
6.7 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||
S&P 500 Total Return Index |
5.9 | 5.4 | ||||||
Difference |
0.8 | % | | % | ||||
Mortgage Loans
Our mortgage loan department originates commercial mortgages and manages our existing
commercial mortgage loan portfolio. The commercial mortgage loan holdings are secured by
first-mortgage liens on income-producing commercial real estate, primarily in the retail,
industrial and office building sectors. All loans are underwritten consistently to our standards
based on loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage ratios based on income and detailed market,
property and borrower analysis using our long-term experience in commercial mortgage lending. A
substantial majority of our loans have personal guarantees and all loans are inspected and
evaluated annually. We diversify our mortgage loans by geographic region, loan size and scheduled
maturities. On our consolidated balance sheets, mortgage loans are reported net of an allowance for
losses, deferred loan origination costs, unearned mortgage loan fees, and a purchase accounting
adjustment; however, the following tables are reported excluding these items.
47
Table of Contents
The stress experienced in the U.S. financial markets and unfavorable credit market conditions
led to a decrease in overall liquidity and availability of capital in the commercial mortgage loan
market, which has led to greater opportunities for more selective loan originations, especially
those loans in our range of specialization, $2.0 to $5.0. We believe a disciplined increase in our
mortgage loan portfolio will help maintain the overall quality of our investment portfolio and
obtain appropriate yields to match our policyholder liabilities. We continue to prudently increase
our investments in mortgage loans primarily in our Income Annuities and Deferred Annuities segments
to improve our overall investment yields. This strategy has resulted in increased net investment
income when compared to fixed maturity investments. We originated approximately $185 of mortgage
loans during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and expect to continue strong originations for
the remainder of 2011.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 73.3% and 73.6%, respectively, of our mortgage
loans were under $5.0 and our average loan balance was $2.2. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010 our largest loan balance was $12.8 and $13.0, respectively.
Credit Quality
We use the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) as our primary
metrics to assess mortgage loan quality. The following table sets forth the LTV ratios for our
gross mortgage loan portfolio:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | % of Total | Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Loan-to-Value Ratio: |
||||||||||||||||
< or = 50% |
$ | 575.9 | 30.8 | % | $ | 596.2 | 34.7 | % | ||||||||
51% - 60% |
418.1 | 22.4 | 369.8 | 21.5 | ||||||||||||
61% - 70% |
564.5 | 30.2 | 463.7 | 26.9 | ||||||||||||
71% - 75% |
123.2 | 6.6 | 120.4 | 7.0 | ||||||||||||
76% - 80% |
60.9 | 3.2 | 46.3 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
81% - 100% |
92.4 | 4.9 | 90.7 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
> 100% |
34.8 | 1.9 | 33.1 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The loan-to-value ratio compares the amount of the loan to the estimated fair value of
the underlying property collateralizing the loan. In the year of funding, LTV ratios are calculated
using independent appraisals performed by Member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI) designated
appraisers. Subsequent to the year of funding, LTV ratios are updated annually using internal
valuations based on property income and market capitalization rates. Property income estimates are
typically updated between June 1st and September 30th. Market capitalization
rates are updated during the first quarter based on geographic region, property type and economic
climate. LTV ratios greater than 100% indicate that the loan amount is greater than the collateral
value. A smaller LTV ratio generally indicates a higher quality loan.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the mortgage loan portfolio had weighted-average
LTV ratios of 57.9% and 57.0%, respectively. The slight increase in the LTV ratio is driven by a
reduction in the market values of the underlying properties, which is the result of higher
capitalization rates due to a distressed commercial real estate market and originations of new
mortgage loans. The weighted average LTV ratio was 56.5% and 55.2% for loans funded during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. For loans
originated in the three months ended March 31, 2011, 22.4% had a loan-to-value ratio of 50% or
less, and no loans had a loan-to-value ratio of more than 71%. For loans originated in the year
ended December 31, 2010, 31.7% had a loan-to-value ratio of 50% or less, and no loans had a
loan-to-value ratio of more than 75%. The following table sets forth the DSCR for our gross
mortgage loan portfolio:
48
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | % of Total | Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Debt Service Coverage Ratio: |
||||||||||||||||
> or = 1.60 |
$ | 987.7 | 52.8 | % | $ | 896.4 | 52.1 | % | ||||||||
1.40 - 1.59 |
370.9 | 19.9 | 327.1 | 19.0 | ||||||||||||
1.20 - 1.39 |
312.5 | 16.7 | 295.7 | 17.2 | ||||||||||||
1.00 - 1.19 |
116.2 | 6.2 | 117.7 | 6.8 | ||||||||||||
0.85 - 0.99 |
31.6 | 1.7 | 32.0 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
< 0.85 |
50.9 | 2.7 | 51.3 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The DSCR compares the amount of rental income a property is generating to the amount of
the mortgage payments due on the property. DSCRs are calculated using the most current annual
operating history for the collateral. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the mortgage
loan portfolio had weighted-average DSCRs of 1.74 and 1.73, respectively. For loans originated
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, 57.4% and 58.4%,
respectively, had a debt-service coverage ratio of 1.60 or more.
Composition of Mortgage Loans
The following table sets forth the gross carrying value of our investments in mortgage loans
by geographic region:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | % of Total | Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Region: |
||||||||||||||||
California |
$ | 604.4 | 32.3 | % | $ | 533.6 | 31.0 | % | ||||||||
Washington |
280.4 | 15.0 | 270.4 | 15.7 | ||||||||||||
Texas |
185.4 | 9.9 | 168.9 | 9.8 | ||||||||||||
Oregon |
96.0 | 5.1 | 95.6 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
Florida |
62.1 | 3.3 | 54.9 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Other |
641.5 | 34.4 | 596.8 | 34.7 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the gross carrying value of our investments in mortgage
loans by property type:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | % of Total | Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Property Type: |
||||||||||||||||
Shopping Centers and Retail |
$ | 782.0 | 41.8 | % | $ | 735.7 | 42.8 | % | ||||||||
Office Buildings |
522.2 | 27.9 | 460.8 | 26.8 | ||||||||||||
Industrial |
457.9 | 24.5 | 433.9 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||
Multi-Family |
50.6 | 2.7 | 46.8 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Other |
57.1 | 3.1 | 43.0 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
49
Table of Contents
Maturity Date of Mortgage Loans
The following table sets forth our gross carrying value of our investments in mortgage loans
by contractual maturity date:
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | % of Total | Value | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Years to Maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 9.7 | 0.5 | % | $ | 6.3 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
99.2 | 5.3 | 107.1 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
1,001.6 | 53.6 | 871.9 | 50.7 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
759.3 | 40.6 | 734.9 | 42.7 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,869.8 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,720.2 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
For more information and further discussion of our allowance of mortgage loans, see Note
5 to our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
Investments in Limited Partnerships Affordable Housing Investments
We invest in limited partnership interests related to tax credit investments, which are
typically 15-year investments that provide tax credits in years one through ten. As of March 31,
2011, we were invested in 17 limited partnership interests related to the federal affordable
housing projects and other various state tax credit funds. We accounted for these investments under
the equity method and are recorded at amortized cost in investments in limited partnerships, with
the present value of unfunded contributions recorded in other liabilities.
Although these investments decrease our net investment income over time on a pre-tax basis,
they provide us with significant tax benefits, which decrease our effective tax rate. The following
table sets forth the impact the amortization of our investments and related tax credits had on net
income:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amortization related to affordable housing investments, net of taxes |
$ | (2.2 | ) | $ | (1.3 | ) | ||
Affordable housing tax credits |
4.3 | 2.8 | ||||||
Impact to net income |
$ | 2.1 | $ | 1.5 | ||||
The following table provides the future estimated impact to net income:
Impact to Net | ||||
Income | ||||
Remainder of 2011 |
$ | 6.2 | ||
2012 |
14.1 | |||
2013 |
14.6 | |||
2014 and beyond |
50.0 | |||
Estimated impact to net income |
$ | 84.9 | ||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Symetra conducts all of its operations through its operating subsidiaries, and our liquidity
requirements primarily have been and will continue to be met by funds from such subsidiaries.
Dividends from its subsidiaries are Symetras principal sources of cash to pay dividends and meet
its obligations, including payments of principal and interest on notes payable and tax obligations.
We have historically paid quarterly cash dividends on our common stock and warrants at a rate
of approximately $0.05 per share, and plan to pay approximately $0.06 per share beginning with the
dividend declared in the second quarter of 2011. The
50
Table of Contents
declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the
discretion of our board of directors. See Dividends below for further discussion.
Over the past few years, the global financial markets experienced unprecedented disruption,
adversely affecting the business environment in general, and financial services companies in
particular. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the economy continued to slowly recover.
The credit markets remain tight, and, although interest rates began to rise in late 2010, we
continue to experience a low interest rate environment. In managing the challenging market
conditions over the past couple of years, we benefited from the diversification of our business and
strong financial fundamentals. We actively manage our liquidity in light of changing market,
economic and business conditions and we believe that our liquidity levels are more than adequate to
cover our exposures, as evidenced by the following:
| Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were solid and exceeded levels for the same period in 2010. Sales on our deposit contracts (annuities and universal life policies, including BOLI) continue to generate strong cash inflows. | ||
| We continued to generate strong cash flows from operations, which grew slightly by $4.6 to $214.2 as of March 31, 2011, from $209.6 for March 31, 2010. | ||
| While certain lapses and surrenders occur in the normal course of business, these lapses and surrenders have not deviated materially from management expectations. | ||
| As of March 31, 2011, we had the ability to borrow, on an unsecured basis, up to a maximum principal amount of $200.0 under a revolving line of credit arrangement. | ||
| To support the sales of our products and maintain financial strength ratings, we target a risk-based capital level of at least 350% in our life insurance company, Symetra Life Insurance Company. As of March 31, 2011, Symetra Life Insurance Company had an estimated risk-based capital ratio of 475%. This capital level provides more than adequate capital levels for growth of our business. |
Liquidity Requirements and Sources of Liquidity
The liquidity requirements of our insurance subsidiaries principally relate to the liabilities
associated with their various insurance and investment products, operating costs and expenses, the
payment of dividends to the holding company, and payment of income taxes. Liabilities arising from
insurance and investment products include the payment of benefits, as well as cash payments in
connection with policy and contract surrenders and withdrawals and policy loans. Historically,
Symetras insurance subsidiaries have used cash flows from operations, cash flows from invested
assets and sales of investment securities to fund their liquidity requirements.
In managing the liquidity of our insurance operations, we also consider the risk of
policyholder and contract holder withdrawals of funds earlier than assumed when selecting assets to
support these contractual obligations. We use surrender charges and other contract provisions to
mitigate the extent, timing and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by customers from
annuity contracts and deposit liabilities. The following table sets forth withdrawal
characteristics of our general account policyholder liabilities, composed of annuity reserves,
deposit liabilities and policy and contract claim liabilities, net of reinsurance recoverables. The
total represents the sum of funds held under deposit contracts, future policy benefits and policy
and contract claims on the consolidated balance sheets, excluding other policyholder related
liabilities and reinsurance recoverables of $234.2 and $234.3 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively.
51
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total | |||||||||||||
Illiquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Structured settlements & other SPIAs(1) |
$ | 6,679.8 | 30.6 | % | $ | 6,670.4 | 31.4 | % | ||||||||
Deferred annuities with 5-year payout provision or MVA(2) |
377.9 | 1.7 | 377.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Traditional insurance (net of reinsurance)(3) |
185.8 | 0.9 | 185.6 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Group health & life (net of reinsurance)(3) |
90.6 | 0.4 | 95.9 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Total illiquid liabilities |
7,334.1 | 33.6 | 7,329.0 | 34.5 | ||||||||||||
Somewhat Liquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI)(4) |
4,482.7 | 20.5 | 4,444.0 | 20.9 | ||||||||||||
Deferred annuities with surrender charges of 5% or higher |
6,671.8 | 30.6 | 6,176.8 | 29.1 | ||||||||||||
Universal life with surrender charges of 5% or higher |
192.7 | 0.9 | 181.7 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Total somewhat liquid liabilities |
11,347.2 | 52.0 | 10,802.5 | 50.9 | ||||||||||||
Fully Liquid Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred annuities with surrender charges of: |
||||||||||||||||
3% up to 5% |
494.8 | 2.3 | 462.6 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Less than 3% |
188.0 | 0.9 | 231.2 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
No surrender charges(5) |
2,006.0 | 9.1 | 1,946.9 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||
Universal life with surrender charges less than 5% |
439.8 | 2.0 | 439.9 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Other (6) |
16.8 | 0.1 | 21.9 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Total fully liquid liabilities |
3,145.4 | 14.4 | 3,102.5 | 14.6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,826.7 | 100.0 | % | $ | 21,234.0 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | These contracts cannot be surrendered. The benefits are specified in the contracts as fixed amounts, primarily to be paid over the next several decades. | |
(2) | In a liquidity crisis situation, we could invoke the five-year payout provision so that the contract value with interest is paid out ratably over five years. | |
(3) | The surrender value on these contracts is generally zero. Represents incurred but not reported claim liabilities. | |
(4) | The biggest deterrent to surrender is the taxation on the gain within these contracts, which includes a 10% non-deductible penalty tax. Banks can exchange certain of these contracts with other carriers, tax-free. However, a significant portion of this business does not qualify for this tax-free treatment due to the employment status of the original covered employees and charges may be applicable. | |
(5) | Approximately half of this business has been with the Company for over a decade, contains lifetime minimum interest guarantees of 4.0% to 4.5%, and has been free of surrender charges for many years. This business has experienced high persistency given the high lifetime guarantees that have not been available in the market on new issues for many years. | |
(6) | Represents BOLI, traditional insurance, and Group health and life reported claim liabilities. |
Liquid Assets
Symetras insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate
funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. Products having liabilities with longer
durations, such as certain life insurance policies and structured settlement annuities, are matched
with investments having similar estimated lives such as long-term fixed maturities, mortgage loans
and marketable equity securities. Shorter-term liabilities are matched with fixed maturities that
have short- and medium-terms. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries hold highly liquid, high
quality, shorter-term investment securities and other liquid investment-grade fixed maturities and
cash equivalents to fund anticipated operating expenses, surrenders and withdrawals.
We define liquid assets to include cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, publicly
traded fixed maturities and public equity securities. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
our insurance subsidiaries had liquid assets of $21.4 billion and $20.8 billion, respectively, and
Symetra had liquid assets of $115.9 and $89.7, respectively. The portion of total company liquid
assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was $309.1 and $277.1 as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The increase in our insurance subsidiaries
liquid assets was primarily the result of sales of deferred annuities during the first quarter of
2011.
We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset
and credit quality) in evaluating the adequacy of our insurance operations liquidity under a
variety of stress scenarios. We believe that the liquidity profile of our assets is sufficient to
satisfy liquidity requirements, including under foreseeable stress scenarios.
52
Table of Contents
Given the size and liquidity profile of our investment portfolio, we believe that claim
experience varying from our projections does not constitute a significant liquidity risk. Our
asset/liability management process takes into account the expected maturity of investments and
expected claim payments as well as the specific nature and risk profile of the liabilities.
Historically, there has been limited variation between the expected maturities of our investments
and the payment of claims.
Capitalization
Our capital structure consists of notes payable and stockholders equity. The following table
summarizes our capital structure:
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 449.1 | $ | 449.0 | ||||
Stockholders equity |
2,431.0 | 2,380.6 | ||||||
Total capital |
$ | 2,880.1 | $ | 2,829.6 | ||||
Our capitalization increased $50.5 as of March 31, 2011, as compared to December 31,
2010 due to an increase in stockholders equity from our net income of $54.9. We believe our
capital levels position us well to capitalize on organic growth as well as pursue any potentially
favorable acquisition opportunities.
Dividends
We declared and paid a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share during the first quarter
of 2011, for a total payout of $6.9. On May 11, 2011, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per
common share to shareholders and warrant holders as of May 25, 2011, for an approximate total of
$8.3 to be paid on or about June 10, 2011.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated cash flows for the dates
indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 214.2 | $ | 209.6 | ||||
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
(558.3 | ) | (544.1 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
377.4 | 466.0 |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from our operating activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received for premiums on our group medical stop-loss and term life insurance products, income
on our investments, including dividends and interest, as well as the amounts and timing of cash
disbursed for our payment of policyholder benefits and claims, underwriting and operating expenses
and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for three months ended March 31, 2011 increased $4.6
over the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily the result of increased net investment
income driven by an increase in average assets, partially offset by an increase in paid commissions
related to our deferred annuity products on higher sales, and an increase in group medical
stop-loss paid claims.
Investing Activities
Cash flows from our investing activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received from our sales of investments and from maturities and calls of fixed maturity
securities, as well as the amounts and timing of cash disbursed for purchases of investments and
funding of mortgage loan originations.
53
Table of Contents
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased
$14.2 over the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily the result of higher originations
of mortgage loans as we deployed cash generated from sales of fixed deferred annuities. These
increases were partially offset by an increase in cash received from prepayments, maturities and
calls on fixed maturities.
Financing Activities
Cash flows from our financing activities are primarily driven by the amounts and timing of
cash received from deposits into certain life insurance and annuity policies and proceeds from our
issuances of debt and common stock, as well as the amounts and timing of cash disbursed to fund
withdrawals from certain life insurance and annuity policies, and dividend distributions to our
stock and warrant holders.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased
$88.6 over the same period in 2010. This was primarily due to net IPO proceeds of $282.5 million
received during the first quarter of 2010, offset by an increase in policyholder deposits during
the first quarter of 2011 related to the sales of fixed deferred annuities.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of change in the value of financial instruments as a result of
absolute or relative changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, or equity or
commodity prices. To varying degrees, the investment and trading activities supporting all of our
products and services generate market risks. There have been no material changes in our market risk
exposures from December 31, 2010, a description of which may be found in Part II, Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our 2010 10-K. See Item 1A Risk
Factors of Part II in this report for a discussion of how changes to the operating and investing
markets may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act),
under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a15(e) of the 1934 Act, as of March 31, 2011. Based on this
evaluation our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of
March 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Limitations on Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors or fraud. Any control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, is based on certain assumptions and can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
54
Table of Contents
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Disclosure concerning material legal proceedings can be found in Item 1 Financial Statements,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies under the
caption, Litigation, which is incorporated here by this reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, consideration should be given
to the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2010 10-K. If any of those
factors were to occur, they could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or
future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
forward-looking statements in this report. There have been no material changes to the risk factors
set forth in the above-referenced filings as of March 31, 2011.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.1
|
Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement Pursuant to the Symetra Financial Corporation Equity Plan 2011-2013 Grant* | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended* | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended* | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
* | Filed herewith. |
55
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
SYMETRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
||||
Date: May 12, 2011 | By: | /s/ Thomas M. Marra | ||
Name: | Thomas M. Marra | |||
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: May 12, 2011 | By: | /s/ Margaret A. Meister | ||
Name: | Margaret A. Meister | |||
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
56