Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - SMF ENERGY CORPv222131_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - SMF ENERGY CORPv222131_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - SMF ENERGY CORPv222131_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
 
OR
 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Commission File Number 000-21825
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
65-0707824
(State of Incorporation)
 
(IRS Employer Identification Number)

200 West Cypress Creek Road, Suite 400, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
33309
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

(954) 308-4200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes x     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨
 
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes ¨    No x

As of May 6, 2011 there were 8,401,213 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 
 

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION
 
FORM 10-Q
 
INDEX
 
Form 10-Q Part and Item No.
 
Part I
Financial Information:
 
     
 
Item 1.
Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
       
   
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 (unaudited) and June 30, 2010
3
       
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine-months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
4
       
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine-months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
5
       
   
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
7
       
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
18
       
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
33
       
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
34
       
Part II
Other Information:  
       
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
35
       
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
35
       
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
35
       
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
35
       
 
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
35
       
 
Item 5.
Other Information
36
       
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
36
       
 
Signatures
37
     
 
Certifications
39
 
 
2

 
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(in 000’s, except share and per share data)

   
March 31, 2011
   
June 30, 2010
 
 
 
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 109     $ 115  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,101 and $1,025
    21,309       17,530  
Inventories, net of reserves of $91 and $98
    2,288       1,744  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    397       644  
Total current assets
    24,103       20,033  
                 
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $18,154 and $16,947
    7,119       7,226  
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,959 and $1,790
    1,494       1,662  
Goodwill
    228       228  
Deferred debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $286 and $169
    237       355  
Other assets
    70       74  
Total assets
  $ 33,251     $ 29,578  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Line of credit payable
  $ 8,198     $ 6,896  
Current portion of term loan
    1,000       1,000  
Accounts payable
    9,064       7,301  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    3,594       3,191  
Total current liabilities
    21,856       18,388  
Long-term liabilities:
               
Term loan, net of current portion
    2,333       3,083  
Promissory notes
    800       800  
Other long-term liabilities
    836       251  
Total liabilities
    25,825       22,522  
Contingencies
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000 Series A shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding
    -       -  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 Series B shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding
    -       -  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 Series C shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding
    -       -  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000 Series D shares authorized, 599 issued and outstanding
    -       -  
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 8,453,103 and 8,557,314 issued and outstanding
    85       86  
Additional paid-in capital
    36,491       36,657  
Accumulated deficit
    (29,150 )     (29,687 )
Total shareholders’ equity
    7,426       7,056  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 33,251     $ 29,578  
 
The accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited financial statements are an integral part of these condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
 
3

 
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
 
(in 000’s, except per share data)
 
   
For the Three Months
   
For the Nine Months
 
   
Ended March 31,
   
Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
Petroleum product sales and service revenues
  $ 55,521     $ 43,181     $ 147,186     $ 121,764  
Petroleum product taxes
    6,133       5,971       18,093       17,379  
Total revenues
    61,654       49,152       165,279       139,143  
                                 
Cost of petroleum product sales and service
    51,386       39,783       135,425       110,888  
Petroleum product taxes
    6,133       5,971       18,093       17,379  
Total cost of sales
    57,519       45,754       153,518       128,267  
                                 
Gross profit
    4,135       3,398       11,761       10,876  
                                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    3,579       3,555       10,445       10,067  
                                 
Operating income (loss)
    556       (157 )     1,316       809  
                                 
Interest expense
    (228 )     (260 )     (683 )     (751 )
Interest and other income
    4       6       16       12  
                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    332       (411 )     649       70  
                                 
Income tax expense
    (43 )     (8 )     (112 )     (24 )
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ (419 )   $ 537     $ 46  
                                 
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computation:
                               
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.03     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.06     $ 0.01  
Diluted
  $ 0.03     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.06     $ 0.01  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    8,491       8,557       8,515       8,455  
Diluted
    8,627       8,557       8,650       8,693  
 
The accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited financial statements are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
 
 
4

 
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
 
(in 000’s)

   
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income
  $ 537     $ 46  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization within:
               
Cost of sales
    628       682  
Selling, general and administrative
    868       952  
Amortization of deferred debt costs
    117       128  
Amortization of stock-based compensation
    80       179  
Write-off of unamortized acquisition costs
    -       187  
Gain from sale of assets
    (8 )     (3 )
Inventory (recovery) reserve provision
    (7 )     14  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    12       88  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Increase in accounts receivable
    (3,791 )     (1,176 )
(Increase) decrease in inventories, prepaid expenses and other assets
    (286 )     71  
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    2,033       514  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    183       1,682  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals
    (442 )     (296 )
Proceeds from sale of equipment
    24       3  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (418 )     (293 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Proceeds from line of credit
    167,901       144,430  
Repayments of line of credit
    (166,599 )     (144,827 )
Principal payments on term loan
    (750 )     (667 )
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    (237 )     -  
Capital lease payments
    (63 )     (47 )
Payment of preferred stock dividends
    (13 )     -  
Common stock, preferred stock, and warrants issuance costs
    (10 )     (116 )
Debt issuance costs
    -       (20 )
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities
    229       (1,247 )
                 
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (6 )     142  
                 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
    115       123  
                 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
  $ 109     $ 265  

(Continued)

 
5

 
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
 
(in 000’s)

(Continued)
 
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
           
             
Cash paid for interest
  $ 598     $ 590  
                 
Cash paid for income tax
  $ 51     $ -  
                 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
               
                 
Capital leases
  $ 794     $ 43  
 
The accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows.

 
6

 
 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS

SMF Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) provides petroleum product distribution services, transportation logistics and emergency response services to the trucking, manufacturing, construction, shipping, utility, energy, chemical, telecommunications, and government services industries.  The Company generates its revenues from commercial mobile and bulk fueling; the packaging, distribution and sale of lubricants; integrated out-sourced fuel management; transportation logistics, and emergency response services.  The Company’s fleet of custom specialized tank wagons, tractor-trailer transports, box trucks and customized flatbed vehicles delivers diesel fuel and gasoline to customers’ locations on a regularly scheduled or as needed basis, refueling vehicles and equipment, re-supplying fixed-site and temporary bulk storage tanks, and emergency power generation systems; and distributes a wide variety of specialized petroleum products, lubricants and chemicals to its customers.
 
The Company is a Delaware corporation formed in 2006.  In December 2006, the shareholders of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc. (“Streicher”), a Florida corporation formed in 1996, approved changing Streicher’s name to SMF Energy Corporation and the reincorporation of Streicher in Delaware by merger into the Company.  The merger was effective February 14, 2007.
 
At March 31, 2011, the Company was conducting operations through 34 service locations in the eleven states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.
 
2. 
CONDENSED SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation - The condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SMF Energy Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, SMF Services, Inc., H & W Petroleum Company, Inc., and Streicher Realty, Inc.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, and do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles; however, they do include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the Company as of and for the interim periods presented.

Operating results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any subsequent period or the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.  These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “2010 Form 10-K”).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - In fiscal 2010, the Company adopted ASC 825 Financial Instruments which establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels which distinguish between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs).  The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the respective fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.  Level 1 inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2 inputs are other than quotable market prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly through corroboration with observable market data.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities that reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 
7

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
3. 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Total cash and cash availability was approximately $5.3 million and $4.7 million at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, and was approximately $5.7 million on May 6, 2011.  Total cash and cash availability includes cash and cash equivalents as presented in the Company’s balance sheet and cash available to the Company through its line of credit, described in Note 5 – $25.0 Million Loan Facility.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains its cash balances at financial institutions, which at times may exceed federally insured limits.  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation currently insures balances up to $250,000.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such bank accounts.
 
4. 
OUTSTANDING SHARES AND NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
As of March 31, 2011 there were 8,453,103 issued and outstanding shares.  Basic net income per share is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
 
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued.  Conversion or exercise of the potential common shares is not reflected in diluted earnings per share unless the effect is dilutive.  The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding common share equivalents is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the if-converted and the treasury stock method, as applicable.  In determining whether outstanding stock options, and common stock warrants should be considered for their dilutive effect, the average market price of the common stock for the period has to exceed the exercise price of the outstanding common share equivalent.

 
8

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Diluted net income per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, was diluted by additional common stock equivalents as follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Three Months
   
For the Nine Months
 
   
ended March 31,
   
ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
Incremental shares due to stock options awarded to employees and directors
    3       -       2       2  
Incremental shares due to preferred stock conversion rights
    133       -       133       236  
                                 
Total dilutive shares
    136       -       135       238  
 
 Diluted net loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 did not include any common stock equivalents in the computation since the Company incurred a net loss in that period.
 
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share consisted of (in thousands):
 
   
For the Three Months
   
For the Nine Months
 
   
ended March 31,
   
ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
Stock options
    250       418       251       416  
Common stock warrants
    141       141       141       141  
Promissory note conversion rights
    89       89       89       89  
Preferred stock conversion rights
    -       133       -       -  
Total common stock equivalents outstanding
    480       781       481       646  
 
 
9

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

   
For the Three Months Ended,
 
   
March 31, 2011
   
March 31, 2010
 
         
Weighted
               
Weighted
       
         
Average
               
Average
       
         
Common
   
Per Share
         
Common
   
Per Share
 
   
Earnings
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Earnings
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
                                     
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders
  $ 289       8,491     $ 0.03     $ (419 )     8,557     $ (0.05 )
                                                 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                                               
Stock options
    -       3               -       -          
Preferred stock conversion  rights
    -       133               -       -          
                                                 
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders
  $ 289       8,627     $ 0.03     $ (419 )     8,557     $ (0.05 )
 
   
For the Nine Months Ended,
 
   
March 31, 2011
   
March 31, 2010
 
         
Weighted
               
Weighted
       
         
Average
               
Average
       
         
Common
   
Per Share
         
Common
   
Per Share
 
   
Earnings
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Earnings
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
                                     
Basic net income per share attributable to common shareholders
  $ 537       8,515     $ 0.06     $ 46       8,455     $ 0.01  
                                                 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                                               
Stock options
    -       2               -       2          
Preferred stock conversion rights
    -       133               -       236          
                                                 
Diluted net income per share attributable to common shareholders
  $ 537       8,650     $ 0.06     $ 46       8,693     $ 0.01  

On February 11, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors extended the exercise period for certain of the Company’s outstanding common stock purchase warrants (the “Warrants”).  The Warrants were originally issued by the Company in connection with private placements of debt and equity securities in February 2007 (the “February 2007 Warrants”) and August 2007 (the “August 2007 Warrants”) and were scheduled to expire on February 15, 2011 and August 8, 2011, respectively.   

There are 123,297 February 2007 Warrants currently outstanding, each bearing an exercise price of $8.55 per share.  The exercise period for the February 2007 Warrants, which was scheduled to expire on February 15, 2011, was extended by the Board’s action for two years, or until February 15, 2013.
   
The 17,575 August 2007 Warrants currently outstanding bear an exercise price of $7.884 per share.  The exercise period for the August 2007 Warrants, which was scheduled to expire on August 8, 2011, was also extended for two years, or until August 8, 2013.

 
10

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
5.
$25.0 MILLION LOAN FACILITY

The Company has a $25.0 million loan facility, comprised of a three year $20.0 million asset based lending revolving line of credit coupled with a $5.0 million, 60 month, fully amortized term loan and co-terminus with the asset based lending revolving line of credit whichever occurs first.  The Company’s $20.0 million line of credit has a maturity date of July 1, 2012 and permits the Company to borrow up to 85% of the total amount of eligible accounts receivable and 65% of eligible inventory, both as defined.  Outstanding stand-by letters of credit reduce the maximum amount available for borrowing.  Outstanding borrowings under the loan facility are secured by substantially all Company assets.

Interest is payable monthly based on a LIBOR rate and a pricing matrix.  At March 31, 2011, the interest rate for the line of credit was 4.00%.  This rate was priced using a minimum LIBOR floor of 0.75%, plus the applicable margin of 3.25%.

As of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $8.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively, under its line of credit which does not include stand-by letters of credit which reduces the availability.  The line of credit is classified as a current liability in accordance with ASC 470, Debt. Based on eligible receivables and inventories, and reduction from letters of credit outstanding at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the Company had $5.2 million and $4.6 million of cash availability under the line of credit, respectively.  The line of credit primarily enables the Company to satisfy its obligations during the time gap created between the payment for its products and the time when it collect from its customers. As such, due to the volatile nature of the petroleum products, the outstanding borrowings fluctuate as the petroleum market prices change as well as any change in demand from its customers.

The $20.0 million line of credit provides for certain affirmative and negative covenants that may limit the total availability based upon the Company’s ability to meet these covenants.  At March 31, 2011, the financial covenants included a minimum daily availability of $250,000, a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0, and a capital expenditure limitation for fiscal year 2011 of $750,000.  At March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the Company had a sublimit for letters of credit under its $20.0 million line of credit of $1.75 million, on both dates.  At March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, had been issued in letters of credit.  The line of credit was not limited at any time during either period by these covenants.

The Company’s loan agreement for the line of credit and the term loan requires the Company to obtain the consent of the lender prior to incurring additional debt, paying any cash dividends or distributions, repurchasing shares of its capital stock or entering into mergers, consolidations or sales of assets outside the ordinary course of business.  Failure to comply with one or more of the covenants in the future could affect the amount the Company can borrow and thereby adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and financial condition.  At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the loan facility agreement.  See Note 6 for further details on the $5.0 million term loan which balance was $3.333 million at March 31, 2011.

 
11

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
6. 
LONG-TERM DEBT (INCLUDES TERM LOAN AND PROMISSORY NOTES)

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

   
As of
 
   
March 31, 2011
   
June 30, 2010
 
June 2009 term loan (the “Term Loan”), fully amortized, 60 monthly principal payments of approximately $83,333 commencing on August 1, 2009; variable interest due monthly, 4.75% at March 31, 2011; secured by substantially all Company assets and subject to co-terminus provisions under the revolver line of credit.
  $ 3,333     $ 4,083  
                 
June 2009 unsecured convertible subordinated promissory note (the “June 2009 Note”) (5.5% interest due semi-annually, January 15 and July 15, beginning January 15, 2011; interest accrued for first 13 months was deferred and paid on August 12, 2010); matures July 1, 2014 in its entirety.
    800       800  
                 
Total long-term debt
    4,133       4,883  
                 
Less: current portion (Term Loan)
    (1,000 )     (1,000 )
                 
Long-term debt, net
  $ 3,133     $ 3,883  

On June 29, 2009, the Company restructured all of its investor debt and preferred equity (the “Recapitalization”).  In connection therewith, the Company and its principal lender, Wachovia Bank, N.A., amended the Company’s existing $25.0 million loan agreement to provide for a $25.0 million loan facility, which included a $5.0 million, fully amortized, 60 month term loan (the “Term Loan”) which is co-terminus with the revolving line of credit under the $25.0 Million Loan Facility terms if such revolver is not extended beyond June 29, 2012.  The proceeds of the Term Loan were used to pay down $4.867 million of certain promissory notes issued in August 2007 (the “August 2007 Notes”) and $125,000 of certain promissory notes issued in September 2008.  At March 31, 2011, the variable interest rate on the Term Loan was 4.75%.

In the Recapitalization, the Company also extinguished $800,000 of the August 2007 Notes through the issuance of a 5.5% interest only, unsecured convertible subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $800,000 (the “June 2009 Note”).  The June 2009 Note is subordinated to all other existing debt of the Company, including any amounts owed now or in the future to its principal lender.  The holder of the June 2009 Note entered into a debt subordination agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) with the Company and its principal lender, whereby it expressly subordinated its rights under the June 2009 Note to its principal lender.  

The principal balance of the June 2009 Note is due at maturity on July 1, 2014.  Subject to the limitations in the Subordination Agreement, interest is paid semi-annually, except that the interest payment for the first thirteen months was required to be paid on August 12, 2010.  Thereafter, semi-annual interest payments are scheduled on or about each January 15th and July 15th.  All required interest payments have been paid timely.  Unpaid amounts under the June 2009 Note will become due and payable upon the occurrence of customary events of default, provided, however, that the deferral of any payment in accordance with the Subordination Agreement will not constitute an event of default.  If permitted under the Subordination Agreement, the Company may pre-pay the June 2009 Note, in whole or in part, without prepayment penalty or premium.

Twenty-five percent (25%) of the original principal amount of the June 2009 Note, or $200,000, may be converted into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $2.25 per share (the “Conversion Price”) at the option of the noteholder.  The number and kind of securities purchasable upon conversion and the Conversion Price remain subject to additional adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits and other similar events.

 
12

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

7. 
CAPITAL LEASE COMMITMENTS

Certain non-cancelable leases are capital leases and recorded in other long-term liabilities, and the leased assets are included as part of property and equipment, at cost.  Such leasing arrangements include machinery, computer equipment and trucks.  As of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, $132,000 and $45,000, respectively, of the capital leases were classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and $668,000 and $33,000, respectively, were classified in other long-term liabilities.  During fiscal 2011, the increase in the amount of capital leases is primarily attributable to the purchase of four new mobile fueling vehicles (similar to the existing specialized tank wagon truck fleet used by the Company).

 
13

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

8. 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
The following reflects the change in shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands, except share data):

    
Preferred Stock
   
Preferred Stock
   
Preferred Stock
   
Preferred Stock
         
Additional
             
   
Series A
   
Series B
   
Series C
   
Series D
   
Common Stock
   
Paid-In
   
Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
Balance at June 30, 2010
    -     $ -       -     $ -       -     $ -       599     $ -       8,557,314     $ 86     $ 36,657     $ (29,687 )   $ 7,056  
Net income
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       537       537  
                                                                                                         
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (153,711 )     (1 )     (236 )     -       (237 )
                                                                                                         
Issuance cost related to repurchase of common stock
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (10 )     -       (10 )
                                                                                                         
Issuance of common shares as stock-based compensation
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       49,500       -       70       -       70  
                                                                                                         
Stock-based compensation amortization expense
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       10       -       10  
Balance at March 31, 2011
    -     $ -       -     $ -       -     $ -       599     $ -       8,453,103     $ 85     $ 36,491       (29,150 )     7,426  
 
 
14

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Repurchase Program

On July 28, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a share repurchase program (the “Program”) under which the Company may elect to purchase up to five percent of its outstanding capital stock, or approximately 435,000 shares of common stock or common stock equivalents, with available cash to the extent permitted by its revolving line of credit with its principal lender.

The Company’s principal lender had consented to such repurchases on July 1, 2010, conditioned upon the Company’s maintenance  of (i) a ratio of EBITDA to Fixed Charges of 1.3 to 1.0, based on the most recent twelve month period for which financial statements have been provided to the Lender, after giving pro forma effect to any repurchases; and (ii) Excess Availability of at least $2.25 million (A) immediately after making any repurchase and (B) for the ninety days preceding any repurchase, for a total of $840,000 in capital stock repurchases,  including up to $200,000 in any one fiscal quarter.  The Company’s repurchases of its shares are also limited by applicable SEC regulations, including but not limited to SEC Rule 10b-18 and  Regulation M, and by the Company’s insider trading policy.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the Company purchased an aggregate of 153,711 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $237,255 at an average cost of $1.54 per share.  The Board of Directors has elected to retire all of the repurchased shares and any future shares repurchased, so those shares are no longer outstanding and their cost is reflected as a reduction to Additional Paid-in Capital in the Shareholders’ Equity section of the Balance Sheet. Subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2011 through May 2, 2011, the Company purchased an additional 51,890 shares of its common stock at an average cost of $1.62.

Share-Based Compensation
 
The Company currently has the authority to grant stock options and other equity awards to employees and other eligible persons under its 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), which currently has 2,004 options outstanding and 848,496 available for future grants.  The Company no longer grants stock options under its 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (“2000 Plan”) but stock options to purchase 165,231 shares of Common Stock remain outstanding under the 2000 Plan.  Options granted under the 2000 Plan generally vest over three years of continuous service and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant.  As of March 31, 2011, 163,897 of the 165,231 options that remain outstanding under the 2000 Plan are vested and exercisable.
 
The Company also no longer grants any stock options under its Directors Stock Options Plan but stock options to purchase 85,777 shares of Common Stock remain outstanding under the Directors Plan.  All outstanding stock options under the Directors Plan are fully vested and presently exercisable.
 
In September 2009, the exercise prices of all outstanding employee stock options previously granted under the 2000 Stock Option Plan were amended by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to have an exercise price of $2.48 per share after the October 1, 2009 reverse stock split, or $0.55 per share before the reverse stock split (the “Amendments”).  The Amendments did not change the vesting schedules or any of the other terms of the respective stock options.  As a result of the repricing of the options effected by the Amendments, the Company incurred a non-cash charge of $93,000 to stock-based compensation amortization expense during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and an additional $5,000 which is being amortized over the remaining vesting period of the related options.  This modification affected 31 employees who held 327,614 stock options on June 30, 2009, adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of October 1, 2009.

During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, the Company issued a total of 18,000 (6,000 in each fiscal quarter) fully vested shares to the six non-employee members of the Board of Directors under the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan valued at $1.40, $1.47 and $1.53 per share, respectively, the market closing price on the last trading day prior to their issuance.  The Company also issued 31,500 shares of restricted stock to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, valued at $1.31 per share, the market closing price on the last trading day prior to their issuance, which shares became fully vested on December 21, 2010.  On that date, 111,113 stock options previously granted to the Chief Executive Officer under the 2000 Plan expired.  The cost of the grant of restricted stock was recognized as stock-based compensation expense over their vesting period.  In order to encourage the Directors and the Chief Executive Officer to retain the stock when it vested notwithstanding the tax burden created thereby, the Company made aggregate payments of $4,200, $25,043 and $4,650 in the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2011, respectively, to grantees equal to 50% of the market value of the shares on the vesting date.

 
15

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
9. 
CONTINGENCIES

The Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time parties to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims incident to their business activities.  Such matters may include, among other things, assertions of contract breach, claims for indemnity arising in the course of the business and claims by persons whose employment with us has been terminated.  Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance.  Consequently, management is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability, amounts which may be covered by insurance or recoverable from third parties, or the financial impact with respect to these matters as of March 31, 2011.  Therefore no contingency gains or losses have been recorded as of March 31, 2011.
 
On May 26, 2009, the Company filed a Demand for Arbitration with the American Arbitration Association in Broward County, Florida, under which the Company brought claims against various members of the Harkrider family arising out of the Company’s October 1, 2005 purchase of H & W Petroleum Company, Inc. (“H & W”) from the Harkrider family and H & W’s purchase of certain assets of Harkrider Distributing Company, Inc. (“HDC”) immediately prior to the Company’s purchase of H & W.  In that action, Case No. 32 198 Y 00415 09 (the “Arbitration”), the Company and H & W, which is now the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, sought damages for breaches of, and indemnification under, the October 1, 2005, Stock Purchase Agreement between various Harkrider family members and the Company and under the September 29, 2005, Asset Purchase Agreement between HDC and various members of the Harkrider family, on the one hand, and H & W on the other, along with various other claims arising from the transaction.  Also on May 26, 2009, H & W filed a second action against various members of the Harkrider family in the District Court in Harris County, Texas, Civil Action No. 2009-32909 (the “Harris County Action”), seeking damages and declaratory relief for various breaches of H & W’s lease of its Houston, Texas, facility by H & W’s landlord, the Harkrider Family Partnership, and other related claims.  On June 24, 2009, the parties to the Arbitration and the Harris County Action agreed that all of the claims brought in the Arbitration would be dismissed and all of those claims would be added to the Harris County Action.  On June 29, 2009, in accordance with the stipulation of the parties to consolidate the Arbitration with the Harris County Action, the American Arbitration Association closed the Arbitration.  The Harris County Action is currently in the discovery phase but the case is inactive, since the parties have entered into a standstill agreement while they engage in settlement discussions.

 
16

 

SMF ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

10. 
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(Included in ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing”, previously FAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to FAS No. 140”)

In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS Statement No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to FAS No. 140” (“FAS No. 166”).  FAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets including limiting the circumstances in which a company can derecognize a portion of a financial asset, and requires additional disclosures.  FAS No. 166 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company’s adoption of this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU No. 2010-06”), which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.  This update provides amendments to Topic 820 that will provide more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3.  The new disclosures and clarification of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlement in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company’s adoption of the ASU No. 2010-06 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 
17

 

ITEM 2.   
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward Looking Statements

This report, including but not limited to this Item 2 and the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1, contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These statements concern expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts.  Statements preceded by, followed by, or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” or similar expressions are generally considered to be forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements reflect our current view about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  A number of important factors may affect our actual results and could cause them to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement.  In addition to the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the inaccuracy of any of the following assumptions could prevent us from achieving our goals, and cause the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements and the actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by those forward-looking statements:

 
·
Our continuing success in minimizing the negative impact on our operations, revenues and profitability from current and future unfavorable economic and market conditions;
 
 
·
The avoidance of significant provisions for bad debt reserves on our accounts receivable;
 
 
·
The avoidance of negative customer reactions to new or existing marketing strategies;
 
 
·
The avoidance of significant inventory reserves for slow moving products;
 
 
·
Our continuing ability to acquire sufficient trade credit from fuel and lubricants suppliers and other vendors; and
 
 
·
The successful execution of our acquisition and diversification strategy, including the availability of sufficient capital to acquire additional businesses and to support the infrastructure requirements of a larger combined company.
 
OUR BUSINESS

We are a supplier of specialized transportation and distribution services for petroleum products and chemicals.  We provide commercial mobile and bulk fueling, lubricant and chemical distribution, emergency response services and transportation logistics to the trucking, manufacturing, construction, shipping, utility, energy, chemical, telecommunications and government services industries.  At March 31, 2011, we were conducting operations through 34 service locations in eleven states:  Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.

We provide commercial mobile and bulk fueling, integrated out-sourced fuel management, packaging, distribution and sale of lubricants and chemicals, transportation logistics, and emergency response services.  Our specialized equipment fleet distributes diesel fuel and gasoline to customer locations on a regularly scheduled or as needed basis, refueling vehicles and equipment, re-supplying bulk storage tanks, and providing fuel for emergency power generation systems.  Our fleet also handles the movement of customer equipment as well as storage tanks we provide for use by our customers.  We also distribute a wide variety of specialized petroleum products, lubricants and chemicals to our customers in Texas and in certain other markets.
 
 
18

 

We compete with several large and numerous small distributors, jobbers and other companies offering services and products in the same markets in which we operate.  We believe that the industry and these markets offer us opportunities for consolidation, as customers increasingly demand one-stop shopping for their petroleum based needs and seek reliable supply distribution services particularly to prevent business interruptions during emergencies.  We believe that certain factors, such as our ability to provide a range of services and petroleum based products and services, create advantages for us when compared to our competitors.
 
A principal objective of our business strategy is to become the leading “single source” provider of petroleum products and services in the markets we currently operate in, as well as expanding into additional contiguous markets.  To achieve this objective we plan to focus on increasing revenues in our core operations and in expanding through selective acquisitions.
 
 
19

 

OVERVIEW
 
 Despite the challenges of a stagnant economic environment adversely affecting our customer base, we are reporting yet another bottom line profit for the quarter.  In the three months ended March 31, 2011, our net income was $289,000, our operating income was $556,000, and our EBITDA1, a non-GAAP measure, was $1.0 million.  Our net margin per gallon for the quarter was $0.25.  We have now achieved positive net income for six of the last seven quarters, generating an aggregate of $6.9 million in EBITDA and net income of $1.0 million during the seven quarters.  Since the beginning of that twenty-one month period, we have increased our shareholders’ equity by $1.1 million or 17%, exclusive of a $237,000 reduction in shareholders' equity from the retirement of common stock acquired in our stock repurchase program, and we have reduced our long term debt by $1.7 million, or 29%.  As we have previously explained, our steady improvement in financial condition and operating results  had its roots in 2006, when we started investing in infrastructure and was solidified by the financial resources generated from  our June 2009 Recapitalization of $40.0 million in debt and equity.

We remain focused on maintaining this record of profitability and a strengthened balance sheet.  So far, for the first nine fiscal months, our gallons sold have increased 2% over the same period a year ago.  Most of this increase is attributable to new customers, since we have still not seen a substantial rebound from the drop in same customer demand that we saw at the beginning of the economic downturn.  We are preparing for continuing growth by investing in our fleet, with ten new specialized fueling trucks expected by summer 2011.  This investment of approximately $2.0 million, through capital leases, will support an even higher level of organic growth in both existing and potential new markets, while reducing operating expenses, improving efficiencies and satisfying new California emissions standards.  Our balance sheet was further bolstered by continuing paydowns of term debt and contributions to equity from bottom line performance.  We paid down $250,000 in principal of our long-term debt this third fiscal quarter, for a total of $750,000 this fiscal year to date.  Our debt to equity ratio was 1.7 at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the fixed charge coverage ratio1 was 1.51 for the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2011, well above the fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 required by our bank covenants.

We continue to actively investigate and evaluate opportunities for growth through mergers and acquisitions.  We believe that, notwithstanding the continued weakness in economic conditions, we can take advantage of the opportunities for synergies presented by our scalable front and back office system and management structure, which was built for a high level of growth and quick integration.  The access to equity capital at reasonable prices, however, is a lynchpin to most acquisition activity.  Along those lines, we continue to believe that, in light of our bottom line performance and solid balance sheet and the inapposite weakness in the price of our common stock, repurchases of that stock at prevailing market prices remains a worthwhile use of our capital.  Via our open market stock repurchase program, which began this fiscal year, we had purchased a total of 153,711 shares of common stock for approximately $237,000 as of March 31, 2011, and we are continuing the program in the quarter ending June 30, 2011.  It should be noted that, while our board of directors and our principal lender authorized the purchase of up to $840,000 of capital stock, our purchases have been constrained by market blackout periods and limitations imposed by SEC regulations, including Securities Exchange Act  Rule 10b-18 and Regulation M an insider trading policy.  We expect to continue this program, however, so long as we believe that the cost of acquiring shares of our common stock at prevailing market prices is a reasonable allocation of our financial resources.  Needless to say, we would prefer to see market prices that better reflect our financial performance, as they would facilitate future acquisition activity by reducing unwarranted dilution to existing shareholders from such activity.
 
1EBITDA, fixed charges and fixed charge coverage ratio are non-GAAP measures within the meaning of SEC Regulation G.  See “Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions” below.
 
 
20

 
 
The following table presents certain operating results for the last eight sequential quarters (in thousands, except net margin per gallon):

    
For the Three Months Ended,
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2009
   
2009
   
2009
 
                                                 
Revenues
  $ 61,654     $ 52,564     $ 51,061     $ 53,704     $ 49,152     $ 46,305     $ 43,686     $ 39,884  
                                                                 
Gross profit
  $ 4,135     $ 3,788     $ 3,838     $ 4,320     $ 3,398     $ 3,381     $ 4,097     $ 3,539  
                                                                 
Selling, general and administrative
  $ 3,579     $ 3,374     $ 3,492     $ 3,678     $ 3,555     $ 2,673     $ 3,839     $ 3,401  
                                                                 
Operating income (loss)
  $ 556     $ 414     $ 346     $ 642     $ (157 )   $ 708     $ 258     $ 138  
                                                                 
Interest expense and other income, net
  $ (224 )   $ (222 )   $ (221 )   $ (215 )   $ (254 )   $ (255 )   $ (230 )   $ (454 )
                                                                 
Non-cash ASC 470-20 (formerly FAS No. 84) inducement on extinguishment 2
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ (1,651 )
                                                                 
Gain on extinguishment of promissory notes
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 27  
                                                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ 134     $ 114     $ 419     $ (419 )   $ 445     $ 20     $ (1,948 )
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash write-off of unamortized acquisition costs
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 187     $ -  
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash stock options repricing costs
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 93     $ -  
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash ASC 470-20 (formerly FAS No. 84) inducement on extinguishment 1
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 1,651  
                                                                 
Adjusted net income (loss) before non-cash, non-recurring charges 1
  $ 289     $ 134     $ 114     $ 419     $ (419 )   $ 445     $ 300     $ (297 )
                                                                 
EBITDA 1
  $ 1,026     $ 929     $ 953     $ 1,189     $ 398     $ 1,289     $ 1,134     $ 876  
                                                                 
Net margin
  $ 4,317     $ 3,969     $ 4,103     $ 4,529     $ 3,616     $ 3,609     $ 4,333     $ 3,795  
                                                                 
Net margin per gallon 1
  $ 0.25     $ 0.23     $ 0.23     $ 0.25     $ 0.21     $ 0.21     $ 0.26     $ 0.23  
                                                                 
Gallons sold
    17,335       17,025       17,912       18,385       17,382       16,956       16,945       16,709  

1 Non-GAAP measure.  See “Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions” below.
 
2 See “Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions” below.
 
Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions
 
EBITDA.  EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We believe that EBITDA provides useful information to investors because it excludes transactions not related to the core cash operating business activities, allowing meaningful analysis of the performance of our core cash operations.  To the extent that gain and the non-cash ASC 470-20 (formerly FAS No. 84) inducement on extinguishment of promissory notes constitutes the recognition of previously deferred interest or finance cost, it is considered interest expense for the calculation of certain interest expense amounts.  Both stock-based compensation amortization expense and the write-off of unamortized acquisition costs are considered amortization items to be excluded in the EBITDA calculation.
 
 
21

 
 
The following table reconciles EBITDA (Non-GAAP measure) to the reported Net income (loss) for each of the eight quarterly periods presented above (in thousands):
 
    
For the Three Months Ended,
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2009
   
2009
   
2009
 
                                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ 134     $ 114     $ 419     $ (419 )   $ 445     $ 20     $ (1,948 )
                                                                 
Add back:
                                                               
                                                                 
Interest expense
    228       232       223       227       260       261       230       545  
                                                                 
Income tax expense
    43       58       11       8       8       8       8       8  
                                                                 
Depreciation and amortization expense within:
                                                               
                                                                 
Cost of sales
    182       180       266       208       218       228       236       254  
                                                                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    274       276       318       316       316       316       320       344  
                                                                 
Stock-based compensation amortization expense
    10       49       21       11       15       31       133       49  
                                                                 
Write-off of unamortized acquisition costs
    -       -       -       -       -       -       187       -  
                                                                 
Non-cash ASC 470-20 (formerly FAS No. 84) inducement on extinguishment
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       1,651  
                                                                 
Gain on extinguishment of promissory notes
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (27 )
                                                                 
EBITDA
  $ 1,026     $ 929     $ 953     $ 1,189     $ 398     $ 1,289     $ 1,134     $ 876  
 
Adjusted Net Income (Loss).  Adjusted net income (loss) before non-cash, non-recurring charges is a non-GAAP measure that demonstrates the economic performance of the Company before the impact of charges that do not reflect the ongoing performance of its operations, such as the non-cash accounting charge of $1.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 resulting from the Company’s June 2009 recapitalization, non cash stock option repricing costs and the write-off incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 resulting from the application of a new accounting ruling.  We believe that this non-GAAP measure, like EBITDA, is a meaningful representation of the ongoing performance of the operations.
 
The following table reconciles Adjusted net income (loss) before non-cash, non-recurring charges (non-GAAP measure) to the reported Net income (loss) for each of the eight quarterly periods presented above (in thousands):
 
    
For the Three Months Ended,
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2010
   
2009
   
2009
   
2009
 
                                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ 134     $ 114     $ 419     $ (419 )   $ 445     $ 20     $ (1,948 )
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash write-off of unamortized acquisition costs
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 187     $ -  
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash stock options repricing costs
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 93     $ -  
                                                                 
Less:  Non-cash ASC 470-20 (formerly FAS No. 84) inducement on extinguishment
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 1,651  
                                                                 
Adjusted net income (loss) before non-cash, non-recurring charges
  $ 289     $ 134     $ 114     $ 419     $ (419 )   $ 445     $ 300     $ (297 )

 
22

 
 
Fixed Charges Coverage Ratio.  Fixed charges and the fixed charges coverage ratio are non-GAAP measures that are used by our principal lender and others to help assess the Company’s ability to satisfy cash payments other than those made for operating activities.  Fixed charges are comprised of repayments of principal on debt, purchases of property and equipment, cash paid for interest and income taxes, payments for dividends and repurchases of stock.  The fixed charge coverage ratio generally measures the extent to which EBITDA exceeds the cash requirements, or fixed charges, of the business.  These measurements are made on a trailing twelve month basis.
 
The following table reconciles fixed charges and the fixed charges coverage ratio (non-GAAP measures) to the Net income for the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
 
   
Trailing Twelve Months
 
   
Ended March 31, 2011
 
       
Net income
  $ 956  
Add back:
       
Interest expense
    910  
Income tax expense
    120  
Depreciation and amortization expense within:
       
Cost of sales
    836  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    1,184  
Stock-based compensation amortization expense
    91  
EBITDA
  $ 4,097  
         
Less fixed charges:
       
Principal payments on term loan
    1,000  
Cash paid for interest
    773  
Purchases of property and equipment
    561  
Repurchase of common shares
    237  
Capital lease payments
    78  
Cash paid for income tax
    51  
Payment of preferred stock dividends
    13  
Total fixed charges
  $ 2,713  
         
Difference (EBITDA less fixed charges)
  $ 1,384  
         
Fixed charge coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by fixed charges)
    1.51  
 
Net Margin Per Gallon.  Net margin per gallon is one of the most important measures of our financial performance.  It is calculated by adding gross profit to the cost of sales depreciation and amortization and dividing that sum by the number of gallons sold.
  
Non-cash ASC 470-20 inducement on extinguishment.  Non-cash ASC 170-20 inducement on extinguishment is a non-cash charge we incurred as a result of the June 29, 2009 Recapitalization.  The Company extinguished a portion of the August 2007 and the September 2008 Notes (“the Notes”) through the issuance of approximate 1.2 million shares and approximate 278,000 shares, respectively, at the negotiated price of $1.71 per share, which was greater than the $1.67 per share closing bid price the day prior to the Recapitalization, but lower than the conversion price applicable to the convertible debt instruments, which resulted in the issuance of more shares in the exchange than would have been issued upon a conversion.  The prevalent interpretation of ASC 470-20 is that an inducement occurs any time when additional shares are issued in the extinguishment of convertible debt regardless of the absence of an economic loss or economic intent of the parties to the transaction.  As a result, irrespective of the economic reality of the transaction, ASC 470-20 required the recording of a non-cash “conversion inducement” charge of $1.7 million, based on the difference between the approximate aggregate 471,000 common shares issuable to the applicable note holder under the original conversion rights that existed upon a conversion and the approximate 1.5 million common shares exchanged at $1.71 cents in the transaction that extinguished all of the Notes.  This non-cash charge is deemed a financing expense to extinguish the Notes.  To the extent that the ASC 470-20 inducement on extinguishment of promissory notes constitutes the recognition of a finance cost, it is considered interest expense for the calculation of EBITDA and other interest expense amounts.
 
 
23

 
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

To monitor our results of operations, we review key financial information, including net revenues, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expenses, net income or losses, and non-GAAP measures, such as EBITDA and net margin per gallon.  We continue to seek ways to more efficiently manage and monitor our business performance.  We also review other key operating metrics, such as the number of gallons sold and net margin per gallon sold.  We calculate our net margin per gallon by adding gross profit and the depreciation and amortization components of cost of sales, and dividing that sum by the number of gallons sold. Since our business is dependent on the supply of fuel and lubricants, we also monitor pricing and fuel availability from suppliers in order to make the most cost effective purchases of these products for our customers.

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 (“third quarter of fiscal 2011”) to Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 (“third quarter of fiscal 2010”)

Revenues

Revenues were $61.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to $49.2 million in the same period of the prior year, an increase of $12.5 million, or 25%.  Price variances in market prices of petroleum products provided $12.7 million of the increase in revenues.  The increase in revenues from higher prices was partially offset by a decrease of $200,000 due to a 47,000 decrease in gallons sold compared to a year ago.
 
Gross Profit

Gross profit was $4.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to $3.4 million in the same period of the prior year, an increase of approximately $700,000 or 22%.  Net margins per gallon were 24.9 cents and 20.8 cents for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, an increase of 4.1 cents.  The increase primarily relates to improved pricing and better efficiencies, based on lower direct operating expenses from reducing expenses such as employee expense by $143,000 and repairs and maintenance expense by $187,000.  We continue to identify opportunities to reduce costs and obtain further operational efficiency through the use of our enhanced cost measurement and tracking systems.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) remained flat resulting in $3.6 million in both third quarters of fiscals 2011 and 2010 as a result of the Company’s efforts to continue to contain costs.

 
24

 
 
Interest Expense

Interest expense was $228,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to $260,000 in the same period a year ago, a decrease of $32,000, or 12%.  Since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we have paid down approximately $1.0 million of our term loan.  Our interest rate terms remain basically the same for both periods, which is currently 4.0% for our line of credit, 4.75% for our term loan, and 5.5% for our unsecured convertible subordinated promissory note.

The components of interest expense were as follows (in thousands):

   
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Stated Rate Interest Expense:
           
Line of credit
  $ 115     $ 112  
Long-term debt
    51       64  
Other
    24       43  
Total stated rate interest expense
    190       219  
                 
Non-Cash Interest Amortization:
               
Amortization of deferred debt costs
    38       41  
Total non-cash interest amortization
    38       41  
                 
Total interest expense
  $ 228     $ 260  
 
Income Taxes
 
Total income tax expense of $43,000 and $8,000 was recorded for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We adopted the provisions of ASC No. 740 “Income Taxes” on January 1, 2007.  As of March 31, 2011, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows were required for income tax expense.

As of March 31, 2011, we had net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $34.7 million which expire in various years and for federal income tax purposes of approximately $23.5 million which will begin to expire in the year 2012.
 
Net Income (loss)
 
 Net income was $289,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to a net loss of $419,000 in the same period in the prior year.  The $708,000 increase in net income was primarily attributable to the increase of $737,000 in gross profit.
 
EBITDA
 
EBITDA was $1.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to $398,000 in the same period of the prior year, an increase of $628,000.  The increase was primarily attributable to the increase of $737,000 in gross profit.

 
25

 

The reconciliation of EBITDA to Net income (loss) for the third quarters of fiscals 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ (419 )
Add back:
               
Interest expense
    228       260  
Income tax expense
    43       8  
Depreciation and amortization expense within:
               
Cost of sales
    182       218  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    274       316  
Stock-based compensation amortization expense
    10       15  
EBITDA
  $ 1,026     $ 398  
 
As noted above, EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We believe that EBITDA provides useful information to investors because it excludes transactions not related to the core cash operating business activities.  We believe that excluding these transactions allows investors to meaningfully trend and analyze the performance of our core cash operations.  EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G.  Recapture of previously deferred interest expense is considered interest expense and stock-based compensation amortization is considered an amortization item for purposes of the EBITDA calculation.
 
Comparison of Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 to Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010

Revenues

Revenues were $165.3 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $139.1 million a year earlier, an increase of $26.2 million, or 19%, primarily as a result of $23.0 million attributable to higher market prices of petroleum products during the first nine months of fiscal 2011.  The increase in revenues also reflects an increase of approximately 1.0 million gallons sold, which resulted in an increase of approximately $3.2 million in revenues compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting the expansion of our business into new markets during the second and third quarters of the prior fiscal year.
 
Gross Profit

Gross profit was $11.8 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $10.9 million in the same period last year, an increase of approximately $900,000, or 8%.  The net margin per gallon for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was 23.7 cents and 22.5 cents, respectively, an increase of 1.2 cents.  The increase is partially attributable to the increase in gallons sold but also to improved efficiencies such as reductions of direct operating costs such as employee expense by $207,000 and travel expense by $95,000, as well as lower depreciation expense of $54,000.

 
26

 
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $10.4 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $10.1 million in the same period of the prior year, an increase of approximately $378,000, or 4%.  The increase in SG&A is primarily due to a net $400,000 reduction in SG&A last year resulting from our recovery of legal and professional fees in a litigation settlement.  The settlement  lowered our SG&A costs last year by approximately $587,000, but that one time benefit was partially offset by the $187,000 write-off of unamortized acquisition costs that we incurred last fiscal year as a result of the adoption of ASC 805.  In the first nine months of fiscal year 2011, we also had higher employee expense of $300,000 versus a year ago, as we expanded our operations, and we paid higher credit card fees of $137,000 due to higher fuel prices, offset by lower bad debt expense of $75,000 and a $175,000 reduction in other expenses, such as professional fees, travel, communications expense, property tax and other taxes.  SG&A expenses were also affected by changes to non-cash categories, such as lower depreciation expense of $84,000, and lower stock option compensation expense of $99,000.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $683,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $751,000 in the same period of the prior year, a decrease of approximately $68,000, or 9%.  Since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we have continued to pay down approximately $250,000 of our term loan every quarter, or $1.0 million per year.  Our interest rate terms were generally the same for both periods, around 4.0% for our line of credit, 4.75% for our term loan, and 5.5% for our unsecured convertible subordinated promissory note.
 
The components of interest expense were as follows (in thousands):

   
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Stated Rate Interest Expense:
           
Line of credit
  $ 343     $ 336  
Long-term debt
    166       200  
Other
    57       87  
Total stated rate interest expense
    566       623  
                 
Non-Cash Interest Amortization:
               
Amortization of deferred debt costs
    117       128  
Total non-cash interest amortization
    117       128  
                 
Total interest expense
  $ 683     $ 751  
 
Income Taxes
 
Total income tax expense of $112,000 and $24,000 was recorded for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We adopted the provisions of ASC No. 740 “Income Taxes” on January 1, 2007.  As of March 31, 2011, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows were required.
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $34.7 million which expire in various years and for federal income tax purposes of approximately $23.5 million which will begin to expire in the year 2012.

 
 
27

 
 
Net Income
 
Net income was $537,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to a net income of $46,000 in the same period in the prior year.  The $491,000 increase was primarily attributable to higher gross profit of approximately $900,000 reflecting the expansion of our business, improved margins and efficiencies, offset by $378,000 higher SG&A expense as discussed above.

EBITDA

EBITDA was $2.9 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $2.8 million in the same period of the prior year, an increase of approximately $100,000.  The increase in EBITDA was primarily attributable to the increase of approximately $900,000 in gross profit, offset by higher SG&A expense primarily as a result of last year’s $587,000 recovery of legal expenses and other SG&A expenses as discussed above.

The reconciliation of EBITDA to net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Net income
  $ 537     $ 46  
Add back:
               
Interest expense
    683       751  
Income tax expense
    112       24  
Depreciation and amortization expense within:
               
Cost of sales
    628       682  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    868       952  
Stock-based compensation amortization expense
    80       179  
Write-off of unamortized acquisition costs
    -       187  
EBITDA
  $ 2,908     $ 2,821  

As noted above, EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G.  Also as noted above, we believe that EBITDA provides useful information to investors because it excludes transactions not related to the core cash operating business activities.  We believe that excluding these transactions allows investors to meaningfully trend and analyze the performance of our core cash operations.  EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Recapture of previously deferred interest expense is considered interest expense and stock-based compensation amortization is considered an amortization item for purposes of the EBITDA calculation.
 
Capital Resources and Liquidity

At March 31, 2011, we had total cash and cash availability of approximately $5.3 million, which consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $109,000 and additional cash availability of approximately $5.2 million through our line of credit.  As of May 6, 2011, our cash availability was approximately $5.7 million.  We are able to draw on our line of credit on a daily basis subject to debt covenant requirements.

 
28

 

At March 31, 2011, our trailing twelve months EBITDA was $4.1 million and our fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.51 and the trailing twelve months EBITDA after fixed charges was $1.4 million.  We have a $8.8 million deferred tax asset at March 31, 2011 that remains fully reserved but we have used approximately $1.0 million of the net operating loss carryforward to offset taxable income due in the last two years.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011 we purchased, under capital lease obligations, four new specialized mobile fueling trucks to modernize and increase the size of our fleet.  We plan to purchase six more of these vehicles during this fiscal year.  The  additional equipment we have already acquired has expanded capacity to our system and has helped us improve our own fleet fuel economy and satisfy new California emission standards, giving us further opportunity to expand in new markets and lowering our repair and maintenance expense going forward.  Our principal lender has given us approval to incur up to $2.0 million in new debt to finance this fleet expansion, conditioned upon our continuing satisfaction of specified financial thresholds.
 
On July 28, 2010, our Board of Directors  approved a share repurchase program (the “Program”) under which we may elect to purchase up to five percent of our outstanding capital stock, or approximately 435,000 shares of common stock or common stock equivalents.  Repurchases of capital stock, including shares of common stock and Series D convertible preferred stock, may be made on the open market at prevailing market prices or in block trades, subject to the restrictions relating to volume, price, and timing set forth in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-18, or in privately negotiated transactions.  We have been funding the repurchases from our available cash under our revolving line of credit with our principal lender.  During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, we purchased 153,711 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $237,255.  We intend to continue to purchase additional shares pursuant to the Program. The Board of Directors has determined that all shares so repurchased will not be held in treasury but will be immediately retired.

Our principal lender has approved a total of $840,000 in capital stock repurchases under the Program, including up to $200,000 in any one fiscal quarter, conditioned upon our  maintenance of (i) a ratio of EBITDA to Fixed Charges of 1.3 to 1.0, based on the most recent twelve (12) month period for which financial statements have been provided to the lender, after giving pro forma effect to any repurchases; and (ii) Excess Availability of at least $2.25 million (A) immediately after making any repurchase and (B) for the ninety (90) days preceding any repurchase.

We do not believe that our purchases of capital stock under the Program will meaningfully impair our capital resources or our ability to support the cash needs of our business.  Moreover, while there can be no certainty, we believe that, as a result of the current trend and last year’s net income, EBITDA and cash flow as well as the June 2009 Recapitalization, we have established adequate credit enhancements to meaningfully respond to potential increases in volumes, irrespective of whether they are accompanied by fuel price increases.

Sources and Uses of Cash

We currently have a $25.0 million loan facility with our principal lender, comprised of a $20.0 million revolver coupled with a $5.0 million, 60 month, fully amortized term loan and co-terminus with the asset based lending revolving line of credit whichever occurs first.  

 
29

 

Our $20.0 million line of credit permits us to borrow up to 85% of the total amount of eligible accounts receivable and 65% of eligible inventory, both as defined.  Outstanding letters of credit reduce the maximum amount available for borrowing.  Outstanding borrowings under the line are secured by substantially all Company assets including our transportation fleet and related field equipment.  Our line of credit finances the timing difference between petroleum product purchases payable generally in 10 to 12 days from date of delivery and the collection of receivables from our customers, generally in 10 to 45 days from date of service.  The line of credit has a renewal date of July 1, 2012.

Interest is payable monthly based on a pricing matrix.  At March 31, 2011, the interest rate for the line of credit was 4.0%.  This rate was priced using a minimum LIBOR floor of 0.75%, plus the applicable margin of 3.25%.  The applicable margin is determined quarterly based on a predetermined fixed charge coverage ratio pricing matrix with the applicable margins ranging from 3.00% to 3.75%.

As of March 31, 2011, we have outstanding letters of credit for an aggregate amount of $1.2 million.  These letters of credit were issued so that we could obtain better purchasing terms and pricing than were otherwise available in certain markets.  The letters of credit have twelve-month expirations and renew automatically.  No amounts have been drawn on any of the letters of credit; however, as described above, outstanding letters of credit reduce our cash availability under our line of credit facility.

As of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings of $8.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively, under our line of credit.  Outstanding borrowings under the line of credit are classified as a current liability in accordance with ASC 470, Debt. Based on eligible receivables and inventories, and letters of credit outstanding at March 31, 2011, and June 30, 2010, we had approximately $5.2 million and $4.6 million of cash availability under the line of credit.  The line of credit primarily enables us to satisfy our obligations during the time gap created between the payment for our products and the time when we collect from our customers. As such, due to the volatile nature of the petroleum products, the outstanding borrowings fluctuate as the petroleum market prices change as well as any change in demand from our customers.  The $1.3 million increase in the line obligation principally relates to the recent escalation of petroleum products in the market place.  This market price increase is also evidenced in both higher accounts receivable and payable balances compared to June 30, 2010.

The term loan, with an original amount of $5.0 million, is fully amortized, requiring 60 monthly principal payments of approximately $83,333, which payments commenced on August 1, 2009, with variable interest due monthly (4.75% at March 31, 2011).  The term loan is secured by substantially all of our assets and, under the agreement with our lender for the total $25.0 million credit facility, is co-terminus with the revolving line of credit if that line is not extended.  During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, we have paid down $750,000 of the principal balance of the term loan so that, at March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance was $3.333 million.

In the June 2009 Recapitalization, we also extinguished $800,000 of the August 2007 Notes through the issuance of a 5.5% interest only, unsecured convertible subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $800,000 (the “June 2009 Note”).  The June 2009 Note is subordinated to all our other existing debt, including any amounts owed now or in the future to our principal lender.  The holder of the June 2009 Note entered into a debt subordination agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) with the us and our principal lender, whereby it expressly subordinated its rights under the June 2009 Note to the principal lender.  

The principal balance of the June 2009 Note is due at maturity on July 1, 2014.  Subject to the limitations in the Subordination Agreement, interest is paid semi-annually, except that the interest payment for the first thirteen months was not required to be paid until August 12, 2010.  Thereafter, semi-annual interest payments are scheduled on or about each January 15th and July 15th.  All required interest payments to date have been timely paid.  Unpaid amounts under the June 2009 Note will become due and payable upon the occurrence of customary events of default, provided, however, that the deferral of any payment in accordance with the Subordination Agreement will not constitute an event of default.  If permitted under the Subordination Agreement, the Company may pre-pay the June 2009 Note, in whole or in part, without prepayment penalty or premium.

 
30

 

Twenty-five percent (25%) of the original principal amount of the June 2009 Note, or $200,000, may be converted into shares of our common stock at $2.25 per share (the “Conversion Price”) at the option of the noteholder.  The number and kind of securities purchasable upon conversion and the Conversion Price remain subject to additional adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits and other similar events.

The June 2009 Recapitalization of all of our debt and equity securities strengthened our balance sheet and financial position, immediately lowering our total debt by $4.5 million, increasing shareholders’ equity by approximately $4.1 million and reducing our debt to equity ratio from approximately 9:1 to 2:1 over the prior year.  The June 2009 Recapitalization reduced our cash interest expense and dividends cash usage, as reflected in our results for fiscal 2010 and the first nine months of fiscal 2011.
 
Our debt agreements have covenants that define certain financial requirements and operating restrictions.  Our failure to comply with any covenant or material obligation contained in these debt agreements, absent a waiver or forbearance from the lenders, would result in an event of default which could accelerate debt repayment terms under the debt agreements.  Due to cross-default provisions contained in our debt agreements, an event of default under one agreement could accelerate repayment terms under the other agreements, which would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources.  At the date of this filing, we are in compliance with the requirements of the applicable covenants required by our debt agreements.

On November 23, 2009, the Company entered into a confidential settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) finally resolving all claims in the lawsuit entitled, SMF Energy Corporation vs. Financial Accounting Solutions Group, Inc., Mitchel Kramer, Alex Zaldivar and Kramer Professional Staffing, Inc.  Pursuant to the Agreement, SMF received a payment of $1,050,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.  The payment was a partial recovery of the professional fees incurred in connection with the lawsuit.  The proceeds from the settlement were used to pay down the line of credit and then in turn used to pay for the professional fees incurred with the settlement, and for working capital purposes.  The settlement of this lawsuit had a positive impact on our operating performance and our working capital requirements.

Cash Flows

During the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash and cash equivalents decreased $6,000 and increased $142,000, respectively. 

We generated cash from the following sources (in thousands):

   
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Net proceeds from line of credit payable
  $ 1,302     $ -  
Cash provided by operating activities
    183       1,682  
Proceeds from sale of equipment
    24       3  
Total of generated cash
  $ 1,509     $ 1,685  

 
31

 

We used cash primarily for (in thousands):

   
For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Principal payments on term loan
    750       667  
Purchases of property and equipment
    442       296  
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    237       -  
Capital lease payments
    63       47  
Payment of preferred stock dividends
    13       -  
Payments of debt and equity issuance costs
    10       136  
Net payments on line of credit payable
    -       397  
Total of used cash
  $ 1,515     $ 1,543  
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (6 )   $ 142  
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had $8.2 million outstanding under our line of credit.  The amounts disclosed in the captions titled “Proceeds from line of credit” and “Repayments of line of credit” in the accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 include the cumulative activity of the daily borrowings and repayments, $167.9 million and $166.6 million, respectively, under the line of credit.  The net cash borrowings from, or repayments of, the line of credit during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, have been included as sources or uses of cash in the tables above.
 
Adequacy of Capital Resources

Our liquidity and ability to meet financial obligations is dependent on, among other things, the generation of cash flow from operating activities, obtaining or maintaining sufficient trade credit from vendors, complying with our debt covenants, continuing renewal of our line of credit facility and, if necessary,  raising additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities or additional borrowings.

Our sources of cash during the remainder of fiscal 2011 are expected to be cash on hand, cash generated from operations, borrowings under our revolving line of credit, and any other capital sources that may be deemed necessary.  There is no assurance, however, that if additional capital is required, it will be available to us or available on acceptable terms.

Our uses of cash over the next twelve months are expected to be principally for operating working capital needs, maintaining our line of credit, and servicing any principal and interest on our debt, our ongoing stock repurchase program, payment of preferred stock dividends, and costs incurred to expand or enhance our operations including the purchase of new trucks.  Our line of credit with our principal lender matures on July 1, 2012.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At March 31, 2011, we do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

 
32

 
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
See Note 10 in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q for pronouncements that have already been effective.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
We believe there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding our historical and future performance as these policies affect the reported amount of revenues and expenses and other significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates.  On an ongoing basis, management evaluates and adjusts its estimates and judgments, if necessary.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingencies.  Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be materially different from those estimates.  There were no changes to our critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
 
ITEM 3.  QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

 
33

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

    No change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
 
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.  The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Furthermore, due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake.  Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.  The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any system’s design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

 
34

 

PART II   Other Information

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

  Not applicable.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

  Not applicable.
 
ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On July 28, 2010, our Board of Directors  approved a share repurchase program (the “Program”) under which we may elect to purchase up to five percent of our outstanding capital stock, or approximately 435,000 shares of common stock or common stock equivalents.  Repurchases of capital stock, including shares of common stock and Series D convertible preferred stock, may be made on the open market at prevailing market prices or in block trades, subject to the restrictions relating to volume, price, and timing set forth in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-18, or in privately negotiated transactions.  Repurchases are funded from our available cash under our revolving line of credit with our principal lender.  During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, we purchased 153,711 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $237,255.

Stock repurchases for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:

               
Total number of
   
Approximate dollar
 
               
shares purchased
   
value of shares that
 
   
Total number of
   
Average price
   
as part of publicly
   
may yet be purchased
 
Period
 
shares purchased
   
paid per share
   
announced programs
   
under the program
 
August 1 through August 31, 2010
    8,141     $ 1.30       8,141        
September 1 through September 30, 2010
    21,006     $ 1.37       21,006          
October 1 through October 31, 2010
    38,331     $ 1.41       38,331          
December 1 through December 31, 2010
    28,098     $ 1.66       28,098          
January 1 through January 31, 2011
    15,000     $ 1.74       15,000          
February 1 through February 28, 2011
    1,750     $ 1.84       1,750          
March 1 through March 31, 2011
    41,385     $ 1.64       41,385     $ 430,372  
Total
    153,711     $ 1.54       153,711          

During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, each of the six non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors received a grant of 3,000 shares of restricted stock under the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan pursuant to an automatic grant program calling for such a grant on the last day of each fiscal quarter.  The Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President was granted 31,500 shares of restricted stock that vested on December 21, 2010, when his existing stock options expired.  These grant were made pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

ITEM 3.    DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.    (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

 
35

 

ITEM 5.    OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS

  Exhibits

Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
31.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
31.2
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
36

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 
SMF ENERGY CORPORATION
     
May 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Richard E. Gathright
   
Richard E. Gathright
   
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
   
President (Principal Executive Officer)
     
 
By:
/s/ Michael S. Shore
   
Michael S. Shore
   
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice
   
President (Principal Financial Officer)

 
37

 

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

31.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
31.2
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
38