Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv31w1.htm |
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w2.htm |
EX-10.9 - EX-10.9 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w9.htm |
EX-10.5 - EX-10.5 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w5.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.4 - EX-10.4 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w4.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.3 - EX-10.3 - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213exv10w3.htm |
10-Q - FORM 10-Q - CVR ENERGY INC | y91213e10vq.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
Risks
Related to the Petroleum Business
The
price volatility of crude oil, other feedstocks and refined
products may have a material adverse effect on our earnings,
profitability and cash flows.
Our petroleum business financial results are primarily
affected by the relationship, or margin, between refined product
prices and the prices for crude oil and other feedstocks. When
the margin between refined product prices and crude oil and
other feedstock prices narrows, our earnings, profitability and
cash flows are negatively affected. Refining margins
historically have been volatile and are likely to continue to be
volatile, as a result of a variety of factors including
fluctuations in prices of crude oil, other feedstocks and
refined products. Continued future volatility in refining
industry margins may cause a decline in our results of
operations, since the margin between refined product prices and
feedstock prices may decrease below the amount needed for us to
generate net cash flow sufficient for our needs. Although an
increase or decrease in the price for crude oil generally
results in a similar increase or decrease in prices for refined
products, there is normally a time lag in the realization of the
similar increase or decrease in prices for refined products. The
effect of changes in crude oil prices on our results of
operations therefore depends in part on how quickly and how
fully refined product prices adjust to reflect these changes. A
substantial or prolonged increase in crude oil prices without a
corresponding increase in refined product prices, or a
substantial or prolonged decrease in refined product prices
without a corresponding decrease in crude oil prices, could have
a significant negative impact on our earnings, results of
operations and cash flows.
Our profitability is also impacted by the ability to purchase
crude oil at a discount to benchmark crude oils, such as WTI, as
we do not produce any crude oil and must purchase all of the
crude oil we refine. These crude oils include, but are not
limited to, crude oil from our gathering system. Crude oil
differentials can fluctuate significantly based upon overall
economic and crude oil market conditions. Declines in crude oil
differentials can adversely impact refining margins, earnings
and cash flows.
Refining margins are also impacted by domestic and global
refining capacity. Continued downturns in the economy impact the
demand for refined fuels and, in turn, generate excess capacity.
In addition, the expansion and construction of refineries
domestically and globally can increase refined fuel production
capacity. Excess capacity can adversely impact refining margins,
earnings and cash flows.
Volatile prices for natural gas and electricity affect our
manufacturing and operating costs. Natural gas and electricity
prices have been, and will continue to be, affected by supply
and demand for fuel and utility services in both local and
regional markets.
Our
internally generated cash flows and other sources of liquidity
may not be adequate for our capital needs.
If we cannot generate adequate cash flow or otherwise secure
sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs or
support our short-term and long-term capital requirements, we
may be unable to meet our debt obligations, pursue our business
strategies or comply with certain environmental standards, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations. As of March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $165.9 million and $208.4 million
available under our asset-backed revolving credit facility
(ABL credit facility). Our availability under the
ABL credit facility is reduced by outstanding letters of credit.
Crude oil price volatility can significantly impact working
capital on a
week-to-week
and
month-to-month
basis.
We have short-term and long-term capital needs. Our short-term
working capital needs are primarily crude oil purchase
requirements, which fluctuate with the pricing and sourcing of
crude oil. Our long-term capital needs include capital
expenditures we are required to make to comply with Tier II
gasoline standards and the Consent Decree. The remaining costs
of complying with the Consent Decree are expected to be
approximately $49 million, of which approximately
$47 million is expected to be capital expenditures. We also
have budgeted capital expenditures for turnarounds at each of
our facilities, and from time to time we are
1
required to spend significant amounts for repairs when one or
more facilities experiences temporary shutdowns. We also have
significant debt service obligations. Our liquidity position
will affect our ability to satisfy any of these needs.
If we
are required to obtain our crude oil supply without the benefit
of a crude oil supply agreement, our exposure to the risks
associated with volatile crude oil prices may increase and our
liquidity may be reduced.
We currently obtain the majority of our crude oil supply through
the Supply Agreement with Vitol, which was entered into on
March 30, 2011 to replace an existing supply agreement with
Vitol. The Supply Agreement, whose initial term expires on
December 31, 2013, minimizes the amount of in-transit
inventory and mitigates crude oil pricing risks by ensuring
pricing takes place extremely close to the time when the crude
oil is refined and the yielded products are sold. If we were
required to obtain our crude oil supply without the benefit of
an intermediation agreement, our exposure to crude oil pricing
risks may increase, despite any hedging activity in which we may
engage, and our liquidity would be negatively impacted due to
the increased inventory and the negative impact of market
volatility.
Disruption
of our ability to obtain an adequate supply of crude oil could
reduce our liquidity and increase our costs.
In addition to the crude oil we gather locally in Kansas,
Oklahoma, Missouri, and Nebraska, we purchase an additional
85,000 to 100,000 bpd of crude oil to be refined into
liquid fuel. We obtain a portion of our non-gathered crude oil,
approximately 16% in 2010, from foreign sources. The majority of
these non-gathered foreign sourced crude oil barrels were
derived from Canada. In addition to Canadian crude oil, we have
access to crude oils from Latin America, South America, the
Middle East, West Africa and the North Sea. The actual amount of
foreign crude oil we purchase is dependent on market conditions
and will vary from year to year. We are subject to the
political, geographic, and economic risks attendant to doing
business with suppliers located in those regions. Disruption of
production in any of such regions for any reason could have a
material impact on other regions and our business. In the event
that one or more of our traditional suppliers becomes
unavailable to us, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply
of crude oil, or we may only be able to obtain our crude oil
supply at unfavorable prices. As a result, we may experience a
reduction in our liquidity and our results of operations could
be materially adversely affected.
Severe weather, including hurricanes along the U.S. Gulf
Coast, have in the past and could in the future interrupt our
supply of crude oil. Supplies of crude oil to our refinery are
periodically shipped from U.S. Gulf Coast production or
terminal facilities, including through the Seaway Pipeline from
the U.S. Gulf Coast to Cushing, Oklahoma. U.S. Gulf
Coast facilities could be subject to damage or production
interruption from hurricanes or other severe weather in the
future which could interrupt or materially adversely affect our
crude oil supply. If our supply of crude oil is interrupted, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely impacted.
If our
access to the pipelines on which we rely for the supply of our
feedstock and the distribution of our products is interrupted,
our inventory and costs may increase and we may be unable to
efficiently distribute our products.
If one of the pipelines on which we rely for supply of our crude
oil becomes inoperative, we would be required to obtain crude
oil for our refinery through an alternative pipeline or from
additional tanker trucks, which could increase our costs and
result in lower production levels and profitability. Similarly,
if a major refined fuels pipeline becomes inoperative, we would
be required to keep refined fuels in inventory or supply refined
fuels to our customers through an alternative pipeline or by
additional tanker trucks from the refinery, which could increase
our costs and result in a decline in profitability.
2
Our
petroleum business financial results are seasonal and
generally lower in the first and fourth quarters of the year,
which may cause volatility in the price of our common
stock.
Demand for gasoline products is generally higher during the
summer months than during the winter months due to seasonal
increases in highway traffic and road construction work. As a
result, our results of operations for the first and fourth
calendar quarters are generally lower than for those for the
second and third quarters. Further, reduced agricultural work
during the winter months somewhat depresses demand for diesel
fuel in the winter months. In addition to the overall
seasonality of our business, unseasonably cool weather in the
summer months
and/or
unseasonably warm weather in the winter months in the markets in
which we sell our petroleum products could have the effect of
reducing demand for gasoline and diesel fuel which could result
in lower prices and reduce operating margins.
We
face significant competition, both within and outside of our
industry. Competitors who produce their own supply of
feedstocks, have extensive retail outlets, make alternative
fuels or have greater financial resources than we do may have a
competitive advantage over us.
The refining industry is highly competitive with respect to both
feedstock supply and refined product markets. We may be unable
to compete effectively with our competitors within and outside
of our industry, which could result in reduced profitability. We
compete with numerous other companies for available supplies of
crude oil and other feedstocks and for outlets for our refined
products. We are not engaged in the petroleum exploration and
production business and therefore we do not produce any of our
crude oil feedstocks. We do not have a retail business and
therefore are dependent upon others for outlets for our refined
products. We do not have any long-term arrangements (those
exceeding more than a twelve-month period) for much of our
output. Many of our competitors in the United States as a whole,
and one of our regional competitors, obtain significant portions
of their feedstocks from company-owned production and have
extensive retail outlets. Competitors that have their own
production or extensive retail outlets with brand-name
recognition are at times able to offset losses from refining
operations with profits from producing or retailing operations,
and may be better positioned to withstand periods of depressed
refining margins or feedstock shortages.
A number of our competitors also have materially greater
financial and other resources than us. These competitors may
have a greater ability to bear the economic risks inherent in
all aspects of the refining industry. An expansion or upgrade of
our competitors facilities, price volatility,
international political and economic developments and other
factors are likely to continue to play an important role in
refining industry economics and may add additional competitive
pressure on us.
In addition, we compete with other industries that provide
alternative means to satisfy the energy and fuel requirements of
our industrial, commercial and individual consumers. The more
successful these alternatives become as a result of governmental
incentives or regulations, technological advances, consumer
demand, improved pricing or otherwise, the greater the negative
impact on pricing and demand for our products and our
profitability. There are presently significant governmental
incentives and consumer pressures to increase the use of
alternative fuels in the United States.
Changes
in our credit profile may affect our relationship with our
suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity and our ability to operate our refineries at full
capacity.
Changes in our credit profile may affect the way crude oil
suppliers view our ability to make payments and may induce them
to shorten the payment terms for our purchases or require us to
post security prior to payment. Given the large dollar amounts
and volume of our crude oil and other feedstock purchases, a
burdensome change in payment terms may have a material adverse
effect on our liquidity and our ability to make payments to our
suppliers. This, in turn, could cause us to be unable to operate
our refineries at full capacity. A failure to operate our
refinery at full capacity could adversely affect our
profitability and cash flows.
3
The
recent adoption of derivatives legislation by the U.S. Congress
could have an adverse effect on our ability to hedge risks
associated with our business.
The U.S. Congress adopted comprehensive financial reform
legislation, known as the Dodd-Frank Act, that establishes
federal oversight and regulation of the
over-the-counter
derivatives market and entities that participate in that market.
The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law by the President on
July 21, 2010, and requires the Commodities Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC) and the SEC to promulgate rules
and regulations implementing the new legislation within
360 days from the date of enactment. The act also requires
the CFTC to institute broad new position limits for futures and
options traded on regulated exchanges. Although certain of the
rules and regulations may be delayed, and we cannot predict the
ultimate outcome of the rulemakings, new regulations in this
area may result in increased costs and cash collateral for
derivative instruments we may use to hedge and otherwise manage
our financial risks related to volatility in oil and gas
commodity prices.
Risks
Related to the Nitrogen Fertilizer Business
The
nitrogen fertilizer business is, and nitrogen fertilizer prices
are, cyclical and highly volatile, and the nitrogen fertilizer
business has experienced substantial downturns in the past.
Cycles in demand and pricing could potentially expose the
nitrogen fertilizer business to significant fluctuations in its
operating and financial results, and have a material adverse
effect on our earnings, profitability and cash
flows.
The nitrogen fertilizer business is exposed to fluctuations in
nitrogen fertilizer demand in the agricultural industry. These
fluctuations historically have had and could in the future have
significant effects on prices across all nitrogen fertilizer
products and, in turn, our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Nitrogen fertilizer products are commodities, the price of which
can be highly volatile. The prices of nitrogen fertilizer
products depend on a number of factors, including general
economic conditions, cyclical trends in end-user markets, supply
and demand imbalances, and weather conditions, which have a
greater relevance because of the seasonal nature of fertilizer
application. If seasonal demand exceeds the projections on which
we base production, customers may acquire nitrogen fertilizer
products from competitors, and the profitability of the nitrogen
fertilizer business will be negatively impacted. If seasonal
demand is less than expected, the nitrogen fertilizer business
will be left with excess inventory that will have to be stored
or liquidated.
Demand for nitrogen fertilizer products is dependent on demand
for crop nutrients by the global agricultural industry.
Nitrogen-based fertilizers are currently in high demand, driven
by a growing world population, changes in dietary habits and an
expanded use of corn for the production of ethanol. Supply is
affected by available capacity and operating rates, raw material
costs, government policies and global trade. A decrease in
nitrogen fertilizer prices would have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The
costs associated with operating the nitrogen fertilizer plant
are largely fixed. If nitrogen fertilizer prices fall below a
certain level, the nitrogen fertilizer business may not generate
sufficient revenue to operate profitably or cover its
costs.
The nitrogen fertilizer plant has largely fixed costs compared
to natural gas-based nitrogen fertilizer plants. As a result,
downtime, interruptions or low productivity due to reduced
demand, adverse weather conditions, equipment failure, a
decrease in nitrogen fertilizer prices or other causes can
result in significant operating losses. Declines in the price of
nitrogen fertilizer products could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Unlike its competitors, whose primary costs are related to the
purchase of natural gas and whose costs are therefore largely
variable, the nitrogen fertilizer business has largely fixed
costs that are not dependent on the price of natural gas because
it uses pet coke as the primary feedstock in its nitrogen
fertilizer plant.
4
A
decline in natural gas prices could impact the nitrogen
fertilizer business relative competitive position when
compared to other nitrogen fertilizer producers.
Most nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers rely on natural gas as
their primary feedstock, and the cost of natural gas is a large
component of the total production cost for natural gas-based
nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers. The dramatic increase in
nitrogen fertilizer prices in recent years was not the direct
result of an increase in natural gas prices, but rather the
result of increased demand for nitrogen-based fertilizers due to
historically low stocks of global grains and a surge in the
prices of corn and wheat, the primary crops in the nitrogen
fertilizer business region. This increase in demand for
nitrogen-based fertilizers has created an environment in which
nitrogen fertilizer prices have disconnected from their
traditional correlation with natural gas prices. A decrease in
natural gas prices would benefit the nitrogen fertilizer
business competitors and could disproportionately impact
our operations by making the nitrogen fertilizer business less
competitive with natural gas-based nitrogen fertilizer
manufacturers. A decline in natural gas prices could impair the
nitrogen fertilizer business ability to compete with other
nitrogen fertilizer producers who utilize natural gas as their
primary feedstock, and therefore have a material adverse impact
on the cash flows of the nitrogen fertilizer business. In
addition, if natural gas prices in the United States were to
decline to a level that prompts those U.S. producers who
have permanently or temporarily closed production facilities to
resume fertilizer production, this would likely contribute to a
global supply/demand imbalance that could negatively affect
nitrogen fertilizer prices and therefore have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
Any
decline in U.S. agricultural production or limitations on the
use of nitrogen fertilizer for agricultural purposes could have
a material adverse effect on the market for nitrogen fertilizer,
and on our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
Conditions in the U.S. agricultural industry significantly
impact the operating results of the nitrogen fertilizer
business. The U.S. agricultural industry can be affected by
a number of factors, including weather patterns and field
conditions, current and projected grain inventories and prices,
domestic and international demand for U.S. agricultural
products and U.S. and foreign policies regarding trade in
agricultural products.
State and federal governmental policies, including farm and
biofuel subsidies and commodity support programs, as well as the
prices of fertilizer products, may also directly or indirectly
influence the number of acres planted, the mix of crops planted
and the use of fertilizers for particular agricultural
applications. Developments in crop technology, such as nitrogen
fixation, the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen into compounds
that plants can assimilate, could also reduce the use of
chemical fertilizers and adversely affect the demand for
nitrogen fertilizer. In addition, from time to time various
state legislatures have considered limitations on the use and
application of chemical fertilizers due to concerns about the
impact of these products on the environment.
A
major factor underlying the current high level of demand for
nitrogen-based fertilizer products is the expanding production
of ethanol. A decrease in ethanol production, an increase in
ethanol imports or a shift away from corn as a principal raw
material used to produce ethanol could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
A major factor underlying the current high level of demand for
nitrogen-based fertilizer products produced by the nitrogen
fertilizer business is the expanding production of ethanol in
the United States and the expanded use of corn in ethanol
production. Ethanol production in the United States is highly
dependent upon a myriad of federal and state legislation and
regulations, and is made significantly more competitive by
various federal and state incentives. Such incentive programs
may not be renewed, or if renewed, they may be renewed on terms
significantly less favorable to ethanol producers than current
incentive programs. Studies showing that expanded ethanol
production may increase the level of greenhouse gases in the
environment may reduce political support for ethanol production.
The elimination or significant reduction in ethanol incentive
programs, such as the 45 cents per gallon ethanol tax credit and
the 54 cents per gallon ethanol import tariff, could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
5
Further, most ethanol is currently produced from corn and other
raw grains, such as milo or sorghum especially in
the Midwest. The current trend in ethanol production research is
to develop an efficient method of producing ethanol from
cellulose-based biomass, such as agricultural waste, forest
residue, municipal solid waste and energy crops (plants grown
for use to make biofuels or directly exploited for their energy
content). This trend is driven by the fact that cellulose-based
biomass is generally cheaper than corn, and producing ethanol
from cellulose-based biomass would create opportunities to
produce ethanol in areas that are unable to grow corn. Although
current technology is not sufficiently efficient to be
competitive, new conversion technologies may be developed in the
future. If an efficient method of producing ethanol from
cellulose-based biomass is developed, the demand for corn may
decrease significantly, which could reduce demand for nitrogen
fertilizer products and have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Nitrogen
fertilizer products are global commodities, and the nitrogen
fertilizer business faces intense competition from other
nitrogen fertilizer producers.
The nitrogen fertilizer business is subject to intense price
competition from both U.S. and foreign sources, including
competitors operating in the Persian Gulf, the Asia-Pacific
region, the Caribbean, Russia and the Ukraine. Fertilizers are
global commodities, with little or no product differentiation,
and customers make their purchasing decisions principally on the
basis of delivered price and availability of the product.
Furthermore, in recent years the price of nitrogen fertilizer in
the United States has been substantially driven by pricing in
the global fertilizer market. The nitrogen fertilizer business
competes with a number of U.S. producers and producers in
other countries, including state-owned and government-subsidized
entities. Some competitors have greater total resources and are
less dependent on earnings from fertilizer sales, which makes
them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned
to pursue new expansion and development opportunities. The
nitrogen fertilizer business competitive position could
suffer to the extent it is not able to expand its resources
either through investments in new or existing operations or
through acquisitions, joint ventures or partnerships. An
inability to compete successfully could result in the loss of
customers, which could adversely affect the sales, profitability
and the cash flows of the nitrogen fertilizer business and
therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Adverse
weather conditions during peak fertilizer application periods
may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows, because the agricultural
customers of the nitrogen fertilizer business are geographically
concentrated.
The nitrogen fertilizer business sales to agricultural
customers are concentrated in the Great Plains and Midwest
states and are seasonal in nature. For example, the nitrogen
fertilizer business generates greater net sales and operating
income in the first half of the year, which is referred to
herein as the planting season, compared to the second half of
the year. Accordingly, an adverse weather pattern affecting
agriculture in these regions or during the planting season could
have a negative effect on fertilizer demand, which could, in
turn, result in a material decline in the nitrogen fertilizer
business net sales and margins and otherwise have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. The nitrogen fertilizer business
quarterly results may vary significantly from one year to the
next due largely to weather-related shifts in planting schedules
and purchase patterns. As a result, it is expected that the
nitrogen fertilizer business distributions to holders of
its common units (including us) will be volatile and will vary
quarterly and annually.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business is seasonal, which may result in it
carrying significant amounts of inventory and seasonal
variations in working capital. Our inability to predict future
seasonal nitrogen fertilizer demand accurately may result in
excess inventory or product shortages.
The nitrogen fertilizer business is seasonal. Farmers tend to
apply nitrogen fertilizer during two short application periods,
one in the spring and the other in the fall. The strongest
demand for nitrogen fertilizer products typically occurs during
the planting season. In contrast, the nitrogen fertilizer
business and other nitrogen fertilizer producers generally
produce products throughout the year. As a result, the nitrogen
fertilizer
6
business and its customers generally build inventories during
the low demand periods of the year in order to ensure timely
product availability during the peak sales seasons. The
seasonality of nitrogen fertilizer demand results in sales
volumes and net sales being highest during the North American
spring season and working capital requirements typically being
highest just prior to the start of the spring season.
If seasonal demand exceeds projections, the nitrogen fertilizer
business will not have enough product and its customers may
acquire products from its competitors, which would negatively
impact profitability. If seasonal demand is less than expected,
the nitrogen fertilizer business will be left with excess
inventory and higher working capital and liquidity requirements.
The degree of seasonality of the nitrogen fertilizer business
can change significantly from year to year due to conditions in
the agricultural industry and other factors. As a consequence of
such seasonality, it is expected that the distributions we
receive from the nitrogen fertilizer business will be volatile
and will vary quarterly and annually.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business operations are dependent on
third party suppliers, including Linde, which owns an air
separation plant that provides oxygen, nitrogen and compressed
dry air to its gasifiers, and the City of Coffeyville, which
supplies the nitrogen fertilizer business with electricity. A
deterioration in the financial condition of a third party
supplier, a mechanical problem with the air separation plant, or
the inability of a third party supplier to perform in accordance
with its contractual obligations could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
The operations of the nitrogen fertilizer business depend in
large part on the performance of third party suppliers,
including Linde for the supply of oxygen, nitrogen and
compressed dry air, and the City of Coffeyville for the supply
of electricity. With respect to Linde, operations could be
adversely affected if there were a deterioration in Lindes
financial condition such that the operation of the air
separation plant located adjacent to the nitrogen fertilizer
plant was disrupted. Additionally, this air separation plant in
the past has experienced numerous short-term interruptions,
causing interruptions in gasifier operations. With respect to
electricity, we recently settled litigation with the City of
Coffeyville regarding the price they sought to charge the
nitrogen fertilizer business for electricity and entered into an
amended and restated electric services agreement which gives the
nitrogen fertilizer business an option to extend the term of
such agreement through June 30, 2024. Should Linde, the
City of Coffeyville or any of its other third party suppliers
fail to perform in accordance with existing contractual
arrangements, operations could be forced to halt. Alternative
sources of supply could be difficult to obtain. Any shutdown of
operations at the nitrogen fertilizer plant, even for a limited
period, could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected by
the supply and price levels of pet coke.
The profitability of the nitrogen fertilizer business is
directly affected by the price and availability of pet coke
obtained from our crude oil refinery pursuant to a long-term
agreement and pet coke purchased from third parties, both of
which vary based on market prices. Pet coke is a key raw
material used by the nitrogen fertilizer business in the
manufacture of nitrogen fertilizer products. If pet coke costs
increase, the nitrogen fertilizer business may not be able to
increase its prices to recover these increased costs, because
market prices for nitrogen fertilizer products are not
correlated with pet coke prices.
The nitrogen fertilizer business may not be able to maintain an
adequate supply of pet coke. In addition, it could experience
production delays or cost increases if alternative sources of
supply prove to be more expensive or difficult to obtain. The
nitrogen fertilizer business currently purchases 100% of the pet
coke the refinery produces. Accordingly, if the nitrogen
fertilizer business increases production, it will be more
dependent on pet coke purchases from third party suppliers at
open market prices. There is no assurance that the nitrogen
fertilizer business would be able to purchase pet coke on
comparable terms from third parties or at all.
7
The
nitrogen fertilizer business relies on third party providers of
transportation services and equipment, which subjects it to
risks and uncertainties beyond its control that may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
The nitrogen fertilizer business relies on railroad and trucking
companies to ship finished products to its customers. The
nitrogen fertilizer business also leases railcars from railcar
owners in order to ship its finished products. These
transportation operations, equipment and services are subject to
various hazards, including extreme weather conditions, work
stoppages, delays, spills, derailments and other accidents and
other operating hazards.
These transportation operations, equipment and services are also
subject to environmental, safety and other regulatory oversight.
Due to concerns related to terrorism or accidents, local, state
and federal governments could implement new regulations
affecting the transportation of the nitrogen fertilizer
business finished products. In addition, new regulations
could be implemented affecting the equipment used to ship its
finished products.
Any delay in the nitrogen fertilizer business ability to
ship its finished products as a result of these transportation
companies failure to operate properly, the implementation
of new and more stringent regulatory requirements affecting
transportation operations or equipment, or significant increases
in the cost of these services or equipment could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business results of operations are
highly dependent upon and fluctuate based upon business and
economic conditions and governmental policies affecting the
agricultural industry. These factors are outside of our control
and may significantly affect our profitability.
The nitrogen fertilizer business results of operations are
highly dependent upon business and economic conditions and
governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry, which
we cannot control. The agricultural products business can be
affected by a number of factors. The most important of these
factors, for U.S. markets, are:
| weather patterns and field conditions (particularly during periods of traditionally high nitrogen fertilizer consumption); | |
| quantities of nitrogen fertilizers imported to and exported from North America; | |
| current and projected grain inventories and prices, which are heavily influenced by U.S. exports and world-wide grain markets; and | |
| U.S. governmental policies, including farm and biofuel policies, which may directly or indirectly influence the number of acres planted, the level of grain inventories, the mix of crops planted or crop prices. |
International market conditions, which are also outside of our
control, may also significantly influence the nitrogen
fertilizer business operating results. The international
market for nitrogen fertilizers is influenced by such factors as
the relative value of the U.S. dollar and its impact upon
the cost of importing nitrogen fertilizers, foreign agricultural
policies, the existence of, or changes in, import or foreign
currency exchange barriers in certain foreign markets, changes
in the hard currency demands of certain countries and other
regulatory policies of foreign governments, as well as the laws
and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade and
investment.
Ammonia
can be very volatile and extremely hazardous. Any liability for
accidents involving ammonia that cause severe damage to property
or injury to the environment and human health could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. In addition, the costs of transporting
ammonia could increase significantly in the
future.
The nitrogen fertilizer business manufactures, processes,
stores, handles, distributes and transports ammonia, which can
be very volatile and extremely hazardous. Major accidents or
releases involving ammonia
8
could cause severe damage or injury to property, the environment
and human health, as well as a possible disruption of supplies
and markets. Such an event could result in civil lawsuits,
fines, penalties and regulatory enforcement proceedings, all of
which could lead to significant liabilities. Any damage to
persons, equipment or property or other disruption of the
ability of the nitrogen fertilizer business to produce or
distribute its products could result in a significant decrease
in operating revenues and significant additional cost to replace
or repair and insure its assets, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows. The nitrogen fertilizer facility periodically
experiences minor releases of ammonia related to leaks from its
equipment. It experienced more significant ammonia releases in
August 2007 due to the failure of a high-pressure pump and in
August and September 2010 due to a heat exchanger leak and a UAN
vessel rupture. Similar events may occur in the future.
In addition, the nitrogen fertilizer business may incur
significant losses or costs relating to the operation of
railcars used for the purpose of carrying various products,
including ammonia. Due to the dangerous and potentially toxic
nature of the cargo, in particular ammonia, onboard railcars, a
railcar accident may result in fires, explosions and pollution.
These circumstances may result in sudden, severe damage or
injury to property, the environment and human health. In the
event of pollution, the nitrogen fertilizer business may be held
responsible even if it is not at fault and it complied with the
laws and regulations in effect at the time of the accident.
Litigation arising from accidents involving ammonia may result
in the nitrogen fertilizer business or us being named as a
defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for large amounts of
damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Given the risks inherent in transporting ammonia, the costs of
transporting ammonia could increase significantly in the future.
Ammonia is most typically transported by railcar. A number of
initiatives are underway in the railroad and chemical industries
that may result in changes to railcar design in order to
minimize railway accidents involving hazardous materials. If any
such design changes are implemented, or if accidents involving
hazardous freight increase the insurance and other costs of
railcars, freight costs of the nitrogen fertilizer business
could significantly increase.
Environmental
laws and regulations on fertilizer end-use and application and
numeric nutrient water quality criteria could have a material
adverse impact on fertilizer demand in the future.
Future environmental laws and regulations on the end-use and
application of fertilizers could cause changes in demand for the
nitrogen fertilizer business products. In addition, future
environmental laws and regulations, or new interpretations of
existing laws or regulations, could limit the ability of the
nitrogen fertilizer business to market and sell its products to
end users. From time to time, various state legislatures have
proposed bans or other limitations on fertilizer products. In
addition, a number of states have adopted or proposed numeric
nutrient water quality criteria that could result in decreased
demand for fertilizer products in those states. Similarly, a new
final EPA rule establishing numeric nutrient criteria for
certain Florida water bodies may require farmers to implement
best management practices, including the reduction of fertilizer
use, to reduce the impact of fertilizer on water quality. Any
such laws, regulations or interpretations could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business plans to address its
CO2 production
may not be successful.
The nitrogen fertilizer business has signed an agreement to sell
all of the high purity
CO2
produced by the nitrogen fertilizer plant (currently
approximately 850,000 tons per year) to an oil and gas
exploration and production company for purposes of enhanced oil
recovery. There can be no guarantee that this proposed
CO2
capture and storage system will be constructed successfully or
at all or, if constructed, that it will provide an economic
benefit and will not result in economic losses or additional
costs that may have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
If
licensed technology were no longer available, the nitrogen
fertilizer business may be adversely affected.
The nitrogen fertilizer business has licensed, and may in the
future license, a combination of patent, trade secret and other
intellectual property rights of third parties for use in its
business. In particular, the gasification
9
process it uses to convert pet coke to high purity hydrogen for
subsequent conversion to ammonia is licensed from General
Electric. The license, which is fully paid, grants the nitrogen
fertilizer business perpetual rights to use the pet coke
gasification process on specified terms and conditions and is
integral to the operations of the nitrogen fertilizer facility.
If this, or any other license agreements on which the nitrogen
fertilizer business operations rely were to be terminated,
licenses to alternative technology may not be available, or may
only be available on terms that are not commercially reasonable
or acceptable. In addition, any substitution of new technology
for currently-licensed technology may require substantial
changes to manufacturing processes or equipment and may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business may face third party claims of
intellectual property infringement, which if successful could
result in significant costs.
Although there are currently no pending claims relating to the
infringement of any third party intellectual property rights, in
the future the nitrogen fertilizer business may face claims of
infringement that could interfere with its ability to use
technology that is material to its business operations. Any
litigation of this type, whether successful or unsuccessful,
could result in substantial costs and diversions of resources,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. In the event a
claim of infringement against the nitrogen fertilizer business
is successful, it may be required to pay royalties or license
fees for past or continued use of the infringing technology, or
it may be prohibited from using the infringing technology
altogether. If it is prohibited from using any technology as a
result of such a claim, it may not be able to obtain licenses to
alternative technology adequate to substitute for the technology
it can no longer use, or licenses for such alternative
technology may only be available on terms that are not
commercially reasonable or acceptable. In addition, any
substitution of new technology for currently licensed technology
may require the nitrogen fertilizer business to make substantial
changes to its manufacturing processes or equipment or to its
products, and could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
There
can be no assurance that the transportation costs of the
nitrogen fertilizer business competitors will not
decline.
Our nitrogen fertilizer plant is located within the
U.S. farm belt, where the majority of the end users of our
nitrogen fertilizer products grow their crops. Many of our
competitors produce fertilizer outside of this region and incur
greater costs in transporting their products over longer
distances via rail, ships and pipelines. There can be no
assurance that our competitors transportation costs will
not decline or that additional pipelines will not be built,
lowering the price at which our competitors can sell their
products, which would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Risks
Related to Our Entire Business
Instability
and volatility in the capital, credit and commodity markets in
the global economy could negatively impact our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
The global capital and credit markets experienced extreme
volatility and disruption over the past two years. Our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
negatively impacted by difficult conditions and extreme
volatility in the capital, credit and commodities markets and in
the global economy. These factors, combined with volatile oil
prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased
unemployment, precipitated an economic recession in the
U.S. and globally during 2009 and 2010. The difficult
conditions in these markets and the overall economy affect us in
a number of ways. For example:
| Although we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our ABL credit facility, and that the nitrogen fertilizer business has sufficient liquidity under its revolving credit facility, to run the refinery and nitrogen fertilizer businesses, under extreme market conditions there can be no assurance that such |
10
funds would be available or sufficient, and in such a case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. |
| Market volatility could exert downward pressure on our stock price, which may make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital and thereby limit our ability to grow. | |
| Our ABL credit facility and the nitrogen fertilizer business revolving credit facility contain various covenants that must be complied with, and if we or the Partnership are not in compliance, there can be no assurance that we or the Partnership would be able to successfully amend the agreement in the future. Further, any such amendment could be very expensive. | |
| Market conditions could result in our significant customers experiencing financial difficulties. We are exposed to the credit risk of our customers, and their failure to meet their financial obligations when due because of bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons could result in decreased sales and earnings for us. |
Our
refinery and nitrogen fertilizer facilities face operating
hazards and interruptions, including unscheduled maintenance or
downtime. We could face potentially significant costs to the
extent these hazards or interruptions cause a material decline
in production and are not fully covered by our existing
insurance coverage. Insurance companies that currently insure
companies in the energy industry may cease to do so, may change
the coverage provided or may substantially increase premiums in
the future.
Our operations, located primarily in a single location, are
subject to significant operating hazards and interruptions. If
any of our facilities, including our refinery and the nitrogen
fertilizer plant, experiences a major accident or fire, is
damaged by severe weather, flooding or other natural disaster,
or is otherwise forced to significantly curtail its operations
or shut down, we could incur significant losses which could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows. Conducting all of our
refining operations and fertilizer manufacturing at a single
location compounds such risks.
Operations at our refinery and the nitrogen fertilizer plant
could be curtailed or partially or completely shut down,
temporarily or permanently, as the result of a number of
circumstances, most of which are not within our control, such as:
| unscheduled maintenance or catastrophic events such as a major accident or fire, damage by severe weather, flooding or other natural disaster; | |
| labor difficulties that result in a work stoppage or slowdown; | |
| environmental proceedings or other litigation that compel the cessation of all or a portion of the operations; and | |
| increasingly stringent environmental regulations. |
The magnitude of the effect on us of any shutdown will depend on
the length of the shutdown and the extent of the plant
operations affected by the shutdown. Our refinery requires a
scheduled maintenance turnaround every four to five years for
each unit, and the nitrogen fertilizer plant requires a
scheduled maintenance turnaround every two years. A major
accident, fire, flood, or other event could damage our
facilities or the environment and the surrounding community or
result in injuries or loss of life. For example, the flood that
occurred during the weekend of June 30, 2007 shut down our
refinery for seven weeks, shut down the nitrogen fertilizer
facility for approximately two weeks and required significant
expenditures to repair damaged equipment. In addition, the
nitrogen fertilizer business UAN plant was out of service
for approximately six weeks after the rupture of a high pressure
vessel in September 2010, which required significant
expenditures to repair. Our refinery experienced an equipment
malfunction and small fire in connection with its fluid
catalytic cracking unit on December 28, 2010, which led to
reduced crude throughput and required significant expenditures
to repair. The refinery returned to full operations on
January 26, 2011. Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance
could reduce our net income and cash flows during the period of
time that any of our units is not operating. Any unscheduled
future downtime could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
11
If we experience significant property damage, business
interruption, environmental claims or other liabilities, our
business could be materially adversely affected to the extent
the damages or claims exceed the amount of valid and collectible
insurance available to us. Our property and business
interruption insurance policies have a $1.0 billion limit,
with a $2.5 million deductible for physical damage and a
45-day
waiting period before losses resulting from business
interruptions are recoverable. The policies also contain
exclusions and conditions that could have a materially adverse
impact on our ability to receive indemnification thereunder, as
well as customary
sub-limits
for particular types of losses. For example, the current
property policy contains a specific
sub-limit of
$150.0 million for damage caused by flooding. We are fully
exposed to all losses in excess of the applicable limits and
sub-limits
and for losses due to business interruptions of fewer than
45 days.
The energy and nitrogen fertilizer industries are highly capital
intensive, and the entire or partial loss of individual
facilities can result in significant costs to both industry
participants, such as us, and their insurance carriers. In
recent years, several large energy industry claims have resulted
in significant increases in the level of premium costs and
deductible periods for participants in the energy industry. For
example, during 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused
significant damage to several petroleum refineries along the
U.S. Gulf Coast, in addition to numerous oil and gas
production facilities and pipelines in that region. As a result
of large energy industry insurance claims, insurance companies
that have historically participated in underwriting energy
related facilities could discontinue that practice or demand
significantly higher premiums or deductibles to cover these
facilities. Although we currently maintain significant amounts
of insurance, insurance policies are subject to annual renewal.
If significant changes in the number or financial solvency of
insurance underwriters for the energy industry occur, we may be
unable to obtain and maintain adequate insurance at a reasonable
cost or we might need to significantly increase our retained
exposures.
Environmental
laws and regulations could require us to make substantial
capital expenditures to remain in compliance or to remediate
current or future contamination that could give rise to material
liabilities.
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations relating to the
protection of the environment, including those governing the
emission or discharge of pollutants into the environment,
product specifications and the generation, treatment, storage,
transportation, disposal and remediation of solid and hazardous
waste and materials. Violations of these laws and regulations or
permit conditions can result in substantial penalties,
injunctive orders compelling installation of additional
controls, civil and criminal sanctions, permit revocations
and/or
facility shutdowns.
In addition, new environmental laws and regulations, new
interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased
governmental enforcement of laws and regulations or other
developments could require us to make additional unforeseen
expenditures. Many of these laws and regulations are becoming
increasingly stringent, and the cost of compliance with these
requirements can be expected to increase over time. The
requirements to be met, as well as the technology and length of
time available to meet those requirements, continue to develop
and change. These expenditures or costs for environmental
compliance could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, financial condition and profitability.
Our facilities operate under a number of federal and state
permits, licenses and approvals with terms and conditions
containing a significant number of prescriptive limits and
performance standards in order to operate. Our facilities are
also required to comply with prescriptive limits and meet
performance standards specific to refining
and/or
chemical facilities as well as to general manufacturing
facilities. All of these permits, licenses, approvals and
standards require a significant amount of monitoring, record
keeping and reporting in order to demonstrate compliance with
the underlying permit, license, approval or standard. Incomplete
documentation of compliance status may result in the imposition
of fines, penalties and injunctive relief. Additionally, due to
the nature of our manufacturing and refining processes, there
may be times when we are unable to meet the standards and terms
and conditions of these permits and licenses due to operational
upsets or malfunctions, which may lead to the imposition of
fines and penalties or operating restrictions that may have a
material adverse effect on our ability to operate our facilities
and accordingly our financial performance.
12
Our businesses are subject to accidental spills, discharges or
other releases of petroleum or hazardous substances into the
environment. Past or future spills related to any of our current
or former operations, including our refinery, pipelines, product
terminals, fertilizer plant or transportation of products or
hazardous substances from those facilities, may give rise to
liability (including strict liability, or liability without
fault, and potential cleanup responsibility) to governmental
entities or private parties under federal, state or local
environmental laws, as well as under common law. For example, we
could be held strictly liable under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or
CERCLA, and similar state statutes for past or future spills
without regard to fault or whether our actions were in
compliance with the law at the time of the spills. Pursuant to
CERCLA and similar state statutes, we could be held liable for
contamination associated with facilities we currently own or
operate, facilities we formerly owned or operated (if any) and
facilities to which we transported or arranged for the
transportation of wastes or byproducts containing hazardous
substances for treatment, storage, or disposal.
The potential penalties and cleanup costs for past or future
releases or spills, liability to third parties for damage to
their property or exposure to hazardous substances, or the need
to address newly discovered information or conditions that may
require response actions could be significant and could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. In addition, we may incur liability
for alleged personal injury or property damage due to exposure
to chemicals or other hazardous substances located at or
released from our facilities. We may also face liability for
personal injury, property damage, natural resource damage or for
cleanup costs for the alleged migration of contamination or
other hazardous substances from our facilities to adjacent and
other nearby properties.
In March 2004, CRRM and CRT entered into a Consent Decree to
address certain allegations of Clean Air Act violations by
Farmland (the prior owner) at our Coffeyville refinery and
Phillipsburg terminal facility in order to address the alleged
violations and eliminate liabilities going forward. The
remaining costs of complying with the Consent Decree are
expected to be approximately $49 million, which does not
include the cleanup obligations for historic contamination at
the site that are being addressed pursuant to administrative
orders issued under RCRA and described in Item 1
Business Environmental Matters
RCRA Impacts of Past Manufacturing in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. To date, CRRM and CRT
have materially complied with the Consent Decree and have not
had to pay any stipulated penalties, which are required to be
paid for failure to comply with various terms and conditions of
the Consent Decree. As described in Environmental, Health
and Safety (EHS) Matters and The Federal
Clean Air Act, CRRM and the EPA agreed to extend the
refinerys deadline under the Consent Decree to install
certain air pollution controls on its FCCU due to delays caused
by the June/July 2007 flood. Pursuant to this agreement, CRRM
would offset any incremental emissions resulting from the delay
by providing additional controls to existing emission sources
over a set timeframe. A number of factors could affect our
ability to meet the requirements imposed by the Consent Decree
and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition and profitability.
Two of our facilities, including our Coffeyville crude oil
refinery and the Phillipsburg terminal (which operated as a
refinery until 1991), have environmental contamination. We have
assumed Farmlands responsibilities under certain RCRA
administrative orders related to contamination at or that
originated from the refinery (which includes portions of the
nitrogen fertilizer plant) and the Phillipsburg terminal. If
significant unknown liabilities that have been undetected to
date by our soil and groundwater investigation and sampling
programs arise in the areas where we have assumed liability for
the corrective action, that liability could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition and may not be covered by insurance.
We may incur future costs relating to the off-site disposal of
hazardous wastes. Companies that dispose of, or arrange for the
transportation or disposal of, hazardous substances at off-site
locations may be held jointly and severally liable for the costs
of investigation and remediation of contamination at those
off-site locations, regardless of fault. We could become
involved in litigation or other proceedings involving off-site
waste disposal and the damages or costs in any such proceedings
could be material.
13
We may
be unable to obtain or renew permits necessary for our
operations, which could inhibit our ability to do
business.
We hold numerous environmental and other governmental permits
and approvals authorizing operations at our facilities. Future
expansion of our operations is also predicated upon securing the
necessary environmental or other permits or approvals. A
decision by a government agency to deny or delay issuing a new
or renewed material permit or approval, or to revoke or
substantially modify an existing permit or approval, could have
a material adverse effect on our ability to continue operations
and on our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
Climate
change laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash
flows.
Currently, various legislative and regulatory measures to
address greenhouse gas emissions (including
CO2,
methane and nitrous oxides) are in various phases of discussion
or implementation. At the federal legislative level, Congress
could adopt some form of federal mandatory greenhouse gas
emission reduction laws, although the specific requirements and
timing of any such laws are uncertain at this time. In June
2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that
would have created a nationwide
cap-and-trade
program designed to regulate emissions of
CO2,
methane and other greenhouse gases. A similar bill was
introduced in the U.S. Senate, but was not voted upon.
Congressional passage of such legislation does not appear likely
at this time, though it could be adopted at a future date. It is
also possible that Congress may pass alternative climate change
bills that do not mandate a nationwide
cap-and-trade
program and instead focus on promoting renewable energy and
energy efficiency.
In the absence of congressional legislation on greenhouse gas
emissions, the EPA is moving ahead administratively under its
Clean Air Act authority. On December 7, 2009, the EPA
finalized its endangerment finding that greenhouse
gas emissions, including
CO2,
pose a threat to human health and welfare. In October 2009, the
EPA finalized a rule requiring certain large emitters of
greenhouse gases to inventory and report their greenhouse gas
emissions to the EPA. In accordance with the rule, we have begun
monitoring our greenhouse gas emissions and will report the
emissions to the EPA beginning this year. In May 2010, the EPA
finalized the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, which
established new greenhouse gas emissions thresholds that
determine when stationary sources, such as our refinery and the
nitrogen fertilizer plant, must obtain permits under Prevention
of Significant Deterioration, or PSD, and Title V programs
of the federal Clean Air Act. The significance of the permitting
requirement is that, in cases where a new source is constructed
or an existing source undergoes a major modification, the
facility would need to evaluate and install best available
control technology, or BACT, to control greenhouse gas
emissions. Phase-in permit requirements will begin for the
largest stationary sources in 2011. We do not currently
anticipate that the nitrogen fertilizer business
previously announced UAN expansion project or any other
currently anticipated projects will result in a significant
increase in greenhouse gas emissions triggering the need to
install BACT. However, beginning in July 2011, a major
modification resulting in a significant expansion of production
at our facilities resulting in a significant increase in
greenhouse gas emissions may require the installation of BACT
controls. The EPAs endangerment finding, Greenhouse Gas
Tailoring Rule and certain other greenhouse gas emission rules
have been challenged and will likely be subject to extensive
litigation. In addition, a number of Congressional bills to
overturn or bar the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas
emissions, or at least to defer such action by the EPA under the
federal Clean Air Act, have been proposed, although President
Obama has announced his intention to veto any such bills, if
passed. In the meantime, in December 2010, the EPA reached
settlement agreements with numerous parties under which it
agreed to promulgate final decisions on New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS) for petroleum refineries by November 2012.
In addition to federal regulations, a number of states have
adopted regional greenhouse gas initiatives to reduce
CO2
and other greenhouse gas emissions. In 2007, a group of Midwest
states, including Kansas (where our refinery and the nitrogen
fertilizer facility are located), formed the Midwestern
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, which calls for the development
of a
cap-and-trade
system to control greenhouse gas emissions and for the inventory
of such emissions. However, the individual states that have
signed on to the accord must
14
adopt laws or regulations implementing the trading scheme before
it becomes effective, and the timing and specific requirements
of any such laws or regulations in Kansas are uncertain at this
time.
The implementation of EPA greenhouse gas regulations will result
in increased costs to (i) operate and maintain our
facilities, (ii) install new emission controls on our
facilities and (iii) administer and manage any greenhouse
gas emissions program. Increased costs associated with
compliance with any future legislation or regulation of
greenhouse gas emissions, if it occurs, may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
In addition, climate change legislation and regulations may
result in increased costs not only for our business but also
users of our refined and fertilizer products, thereby
potentially decreasing demand for our products. Decreased demand
for our products may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are
subject to strict laws and regulations regarding employee and
process safety, and failure to comply with these laws and
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, financial condition and
profitability.
We are subject to the requirements of the Federal Occupational
Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, and comparable state statutes
that regulate the protection of the health and safety of
workers. In addition, OSHA requires that we maintain information
about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and
that we provide this information to employees, state and local
governmental authorities, and local residents. Failure to comply
with OSHA requirements, including general industry standards,
record keeping requirements and monitoring and control of
occupational exposure to regulated substances, could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and the cash flows if we are subjected to significant
fines or compliance costs.
Both
the petroleum and nitrogen fertilizer businesses depend on
significant customers and the loss of one or several significant
customers may have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations and financial condition.
The petroleum and nitrogen fertilizer businesses both have a
high concentration of customers. Our five largest customers in
the petroleum business represented 47.6% of our petroleum sales
for the year ended December 31, 2010. Further in the
aggregate, the top five ammonia customers of the nitrogen
fertilizer business represented 44.2% of its ammonia sales for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and the top five UAN
customers of the nitrogen fertilizer business represented 43.3%
of its UAN sales for the same period. Several significant
petroleum, ammonia and UAN customers each account for more than
10% of sales of petroleum, ammonia and UAN, respectively. Given
the nature of our business, and consistent with industry
practice, we do not have long-term minimum purchase contracts
with any of our customers. The loss of one or several of these
significant customers, or a significant reduction in purchase
volume by any of them, could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The
acquisition and expansion strategy of our petroleum business and
the nitrogen fertilizer business involves significant
risks.
Both our petroleum business and the nitrogen fertilizer business
will consider pursuing acquisitions and expansion projects in
order to continue to grow and increase profitability. However,
acquisitions and expansions involve numerous risks and
uncertainties, including intense competition for suitable
acquisition targets, the potential unavailability of financial
resources necessary to consummate acquisitions and expansions,
difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition targets and
expansion projects or in completing any transactions identified
on sufficiently favorable terms and the need to obtain
regulatory or other governmental approvals that may be necessary
to complete acquisitions and expansions. In addition, any future
acquisitions and expansions may entail significant transaction
costs and risks associated with entry into new markets and lines
of business.
15
The nitrogen fertilizer business has announced that it intends
to move forward with an expansion of its nitrogen fertilizer
plant using a portion of the proceeds from the
Partnerships April 2011 initial public offering, which
will allow it the flexibility to upgrade all of its ammonia
production to UAN. This expansion is premised in large part on
the historically higher margin that it has received for UAN
compared to ammonia. If the premium that UAN currently earns
over ammonia decreases, this expansion project may not yield the
economic benefits and accretive effects that are currently
anticipated.
In addition to the risks involved in identifying and completing
acquisitions described above, even when acquisitions are
completed, integration of acquired entities can involve
significant difficulties, such as:
| unforeseen difficulties in the acquired operations and disruption of the ongoing operations of our petroleum business and the nitrogen fertilizer business; | |
| failure to achieve cost savings or other financial or operating objectives with respect to an acquisition; | |
| strain on the operational and managerial controls and procedures of our petroleum business and the nitrogen fertilizer business, and the need to modify systems or to add management resources; | |
| difficulties in the integration and retention of customers or personnel and the integration and effective deployment of operations or technologies; | |
| assumption of unknown material liabilities or regulatory non-compliance issues; | |
| amortization of acquired assets, which would reduce future reported earnings; | |
| possible adverse short-term effects on our cash flows or operating results; and | |
| diversion of managements attention from the ongoing operations of our business. |
In addition, in connection with any potential acquisition or
expansion project involving the nitrogen fertilizer business,
the nitrogen fertilizer business will need to consider whether
the business it intends to acquire or expansion project it
intends to pursue (including the
CO2
sequestration or sale project) could affect the nitrogen
fertilizer business tax treatment as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes. If the nitrogen fertilizer business
is otherwise unable to conclude that the activities of the
business being acquired or the expansion project would not
affect the Partnerships treatment as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes, the nitrogen fertilizer business
may elect to seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS). Seeking such a ruling could be costly or, in
the case of competitive acquisitions, place the nitrogen
fertilizer business in a competitive disadvantage compared to
other potential acquirers who do not seek such a ruling. If the
nitrogen fertilizer business is unable to conclude that an
activity would not affect its treatment as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes, the nitrogen fertilizer business
may choose to acquire such business or develop such expansion
project in a corporate subsidiary, which would subject the
income related to such activity to entity-level taxation.
Failure to manage these acquisition and expansion growth risks
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to consummate any acquisitions or
expansions, successfully integrate acquired entities, or
generate positive cash flow at any acquired company or expansion
project.
We are
a holding company and depend upon our subsidiaries for our cash
flow.
We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries conduct all of our
operations and own substantially all of our assets.
Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our
obligations or to pay dividends or make other distributions in
the future will depend upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries
and the payment of funds by our subsidiaries to us in the form
of dividends, tax sharing payments or otherwise. In addition,
CRLLC, our indirect subsidiary, which is the primary obligor
under our ABL credit facility, is a holding company and its
ability to meet its debt service obligations depends on the cash
flow of its subsidiaries (including the Partnership).
Furthermore, in future periods, as a result of the April 2011
initial public offering of the Partnership, public unitholders
will be entitled to approximately 30% of the available cash
generated by the nitrogen fertilizer business. The ability of
our subsidiaries to make any payments to us will depend on their
16
earnings, the terms of their indebtedness, including the terms
of our ABL credit facility, the Partnerships revolving
credit facility, tax considerations and legal restrictions. In
particular, our ABL credit facility and the Partnerships
revolving credit facility currently impose significant
limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to make
distributions to us and consequently our ability to pay
dividends to our stockholders.
Our
significant indebtedness may affect our ability to operate our
business, and may have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
As of May 6, 2011, CRLLC had senior secured notes
outstanding with an aggregate principal balance of
$472.5 million, $31.6 million in letters of credit
outstanding and borrowing availability of $218.4 million
available under the ABL credit facility, and CRNF, our
subsidiary that operates the nitrogen fertilizer business, had
$125.0 million in term loan borrowings outstanding and
borrowing availability of $25.0 million under its revolving
credit facility. We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur
significant additional indebtedness in the future. If new
indebtedness is added to our current indebtedness, the risks
described below could increase. Our high level of indebtedness
could have important consequences, such as:
| limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or for other purposes; | |
| limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service debt; | |
| limiting our ability to compete with other companies who are not as highly leveraged, as we may be less capable of responding to adverse economic and industry conditions; | |
| placing restrictive financial and operating covenants in the agreements governing our and our subsidiaries long-term indebtedness and bank loans, including, in the case of certain indebtedness of subsidiaries, certain covenants that restrict the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us; | |
| exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or waived) under financial and operating covenants contained in our or our subsidiaries debt instruments that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results; | |
| increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in pricing of our products; and | |
| limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in our industry and in our customers industries. |
In addition, borrowings under our ABL credit facility and the
Partnerships revolving credit facility bear interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, such
variable-rate debt will create higher debt service requirements,
which could adversely affect our cash flow.
Changes in our credit ratings may affect the way crude oil and
feedstock suppliers view our ability to make payments and may
induce them to shorten the payment terms of their invoices.
Given the large dollar amounts and volume of our feedstock
purchases, a change in payment terms may have a material adverse
effect on our liability and our ability to make payments to our
suppliers.
In addition to our debt service obligations, our operations
require substantial investments on a continuing basis. Our
ability to make scheduled debt payments, to refinance our
obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to fund capital
and non-capital expenditures necessary to maintain the condition
of our operating assets, properties and systems software, as
well as to provide capacity for the growth of our business,
depends on our financial and operating performance, which, in
turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, competitive, legal and other factors. In
addition, we are and will be subject to covenants contained in
agreements governing our present and future indebtedness. These
covenants include, and will likely include, restrictions on
certain payments, the granting of liens, the incurrence of
additional indebtedness, dividend restrictions affecting
subsidiaries, asset sales, transactions with affiliates and
mergers
17
and consolidations. Any failure to comply with these covenants
could result in a default under our ABL credit facility and the
Partnerships revolving credit facility. Upon a default,
unless waived, the lenders under our ABL credit facility and the
Partnerships revolving credit facility would have all
remedies available to a secured lender, and could elect to
terminate their commitments, cease making further loans,
institute foreclosure proceedings against our or our
subsidiaries assets, and force us and our subsidiaries
into bankruptcy or liquidation. In addition, any defaults could
trigger cross defaults under other or future credit agreements.
Our operating results may not be sufficient to service our
indebtedness or to fund our other expenditures and we may not be
able to obtain financing to meet these requirements.
A
substantial portion of our workforce is unionized and we are
subject to the risk of labor disputes and adverse employee
relations, which may disrupt our business and increase our
costs.
As of December 31, 2010, approximately 39% of our
employees, all of whom work in our petroleum business, were
represented by labor unions under collective bargaining
agreements. Our collective bargaining agreement with the United
Steelworkers will expire in March 2012 and our collective
bargaining agreement with the Metal Trades Unions will expire in
March 2013. We may not be able to renegotiate our collective
bargaining agreements when they expire on satisfactory terms or
at all. A failure to do so may increase our costs. In addition,
our existing labor agreements may not prevent a strike or work
stoppage at any of our facilities in the future, and any work
stoppage could negatively affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
Our
business may suffer if any of our key senior executives or other
key employees discontinues employment with us. Furthermore, a
shortage of skilled labor or disruptions in our labor force may
make it difficult for us to maintain labor
productivity.
Our future success depends to a large extent on the services of
our key senior executives and key senior employees. Our business
depends on our continuing ability to recruit, train and retain
highly qualified employees in all areas of our operations,
including accounting, business operations, finance and other key
back-office and mid-office personnel. Furthermore, our
operations require skilled and experienced employees with
proficiency in multiple tasks. In particular, the nitrogen
fertilizer facility relies on gasification technology that
requires special expertise to operate efficiently and
effectively. The competition for these employees is intense, and
the loss of these executives or employees could harm our
business. If any of these executives or other key personnel
resign or become unable to continue in their present roles and
are not adequately replaced, our business operations could be
materially adversely affected. We do not maintain any key
man life insurance for any executives.
New
regulations concerning the transportation of hazardous
chemicals, risks of terrorism and the security of chemical
manufacturing facilities could result in higher operating
costs.
The costs of complying with regulations relating to the
transportation of hazardous chemicals and security associated
with the refining and nitrogen fertilizer facilities may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. Targets such as refining and chemical
manufacturing facilities may be at greater risk of future
terrorist attacks than other targets in the United States. As a
result, the petroleum and chemical industries have responded to
the issues that arose due to the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001 by starting new initiatives relating to
the security of petroleum and chemical industry facilities and
the transportation of hazardous chemicals in the United States.
Future terrorist attacks could lead to even stronger, more
costly initiatives. Simultaneously, local, state and federal
governments have begun a regulatory process that could lead to
new regulations impacting the security of refinery and chemical
plant locations and the transportation of petroleum and
hazardous chemicals. Our business could be materially adversely
affected by the cost of complying with new regulations.
Compliance
with and changes in the tax laws could adversely affect our
performance.
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including United
States and state income taxes and transactional taxes such as
excise, sales/use, payroll, and franchise and withholding. New
tax laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or
proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax
liabilities in the future.
18
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
Shares
eligible for future sale may cause the price of our common stock
to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could
cause the market price of our common stock to decline. This
could also impair our ability to raise additional capital
through the sale of our equity securities. Under our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, we are authorized to
issue up to 350,000,000 shares of common stock, of which
86,413,781 shares of common stock were outstanding as of
May 1, 2011. Of these shares, CALLC currently owns
7,988,179 shares and has registration rights with respect
to the remainder of their shares that would allow them to be
sold in a secondary public offering.
Risks
Related to the Limited Partnership Structure Through Which
We Currently Hold Our Interest in the Nitrogen Fertilizer Business
We Currently Hold Our Interest in the Nitrogen Fertilizer Business
The
board of directors of the Partnerships general partner has
adopted a policy to distribute all of the available cash the
nitrogen fertilizer business generates each quarter, which could
limit its ability to grow and make acquisitions.
The board of directors of the Partnerships general partner
has adopted a policy to distribute all of the available cash the
Partnership generates each quarter to its unitholders, beginning
with the quarter ending June 30, 2011. As a result, the
Partnerships general partner will rely primarily upon
external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings
and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund
acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures at the nitrogen
fertilizer business. To the extent it is unable to finance
growth externally, the Partnerships cash distribution
policy will significantly impair its ability to grow. As of the
closing of the Partnerships initial public offering in
April 2011, we owned approximately 70% of the Partnerships
outstanding common units, and public unitholders owned the
remaining 30% of the Partnerships common units.
In addition, because the board of directors of the
Partnerships general partner will adopt a policy to
distribute all of the available cash it generates each quarter,
growth may not be as fast as that of businesses that reinvest
their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent
the Partnership issues additional units in connection with any
acquisitions or expansion capital expenditures, the payment of
distributions on those additional units will decrease the amount
the Partnership distributes on each outstanding unit. There are
no limitations in the partnership agreement on the
Partnerships ability to issue additional units, including
units ranking senior to the common units that we own. The
incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to
finance the Partnerships growth strategy would result in
increased interest expense, which, in turn, would reduce the
available cash that the Partnership has to distribute to
unitholders, including us.
The
Partnership may not have sufficient available cash to pay any
quarterly distribution on its common units.
The Partnership may not have sufficient available cash each
quarter to pay any distributions to its common unitholders,
including us. Furthermore, the partnership agreement does not
require it to pay distributions on a quarterly basis or
otherwise. The amount of cash the Partnership will be able to
distribute on its common units principally depends on the amount
of cash it generates from operations, which is directly
dependent upon operating margins, which have been volatile
historically. Operating margins at the nitrogen fertilizer
business are significantly affected by the market-driven UAN and
ammonia prices it is able to charge customers and pet coke-based
gasification production costs, as well as seasonality, weather
conditions, governmental regulation, unscheduled maintenance or
downtime at the nitrogen fertilizer plant and global and
domestic demand for nitrogen fertilizer products, among other
factors. In addition:
| The Partnerships revolving credit facility, and any credit facility or other debt instruments it may enter into in the future, may limit the distributions that the Partnership can make. The revolving credit facility provides that the Partnership can make distributions to holders of common units only if it is in compliance with leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio covenants on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any distribution, and there is no default or event of default under the facility. In addition, any future credit |
19
facility may contain other financial tests and covenants that must be satisfied. Any failure to comply with these tests and covenants could result in the lenders prohibiting Partnership distributions. |
| The amount of available cash for distribution to unitholders depends primarily on cash flow, and not solely on the profitability of the nitrogen fertilizer business, which is affected by non-cash items. As a result, the Partnership may make distributions during periods when it records losses and may not make distributions during periods when it records net income. | |
| The actual amount of available cash will depend on numerous factors, some of which are beyond the Partnerships control, including UAN and ammonia prices, operating costs, global and domestic demand for nitrogen fertilizer products, fluctuations in working capital needs, and the amount of fees and expenses incurred by us. |
Increases
in interest rates could adversely impact our unit price and the
Partnerships ability to issue additional equity to make
acquisitions, incur debt or for other purposes.
We expect that the price of the Partnerships common units
will be impacted by the level of the Partnerships
quarterly cash distributions and implied distribution yield. The
distribution yield is often used by investors to compare and
rank related yield-oriented securities for investment
decision-making purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates
may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in the
Partnerships common units, and a rising interest rate
environment could have a material adverse impact on the
Partnerships unit price (and therefore the value of our
investment in the Partnership) as well as the Partnerships
ability to issue additional equity to make acquisitions or to
incur debt.
We may
have liability to repay distributions that are wrongfully
distributed to us.
Under certain circumstances, we may, as a holder of common units
in the Partnership, have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or
distributed to us. Under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act, the Partnership may not make a distribution to
unitholders if the distribution would cause its liabilities to
exceed the fair value of its assets. Delaware law provides that
for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible
distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and
who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated
Delaware law will be liable to the company for the distribution
amount.
Public
investors own approximately 30% of the nitrogen fertilizer
business as a result of the Partnerships April 2011
initial public offering. Although we own the majority of the
Partnerships common units and the nitrogen fertilizer
business general partner, the general partner owes a duty
of good faith to public unitholders, which could cause it to
manage the nitrogen fertilizer business differently than if
there were no public unitholders.
As a result of the initial public offering of the
Partnerships common units which closed in April 2011,
public investors own approximately 30% of the nitrogen
fertilizer business common units. As a result of this
offering, we are no longer entitled to receive all of the cash
generated by the nitrogen fertilizer business or freely borrow
money from the nitrogen fertilizer business to finance
operations at the refinery, as we have in the past. Furthermore,
although we own the Partnerships general partner and
continue to own the majority of the Partnerships common
units, the Partnerships general partner is subject to
certain fiduciary duties, which may require the general partner
to manage the nitrogen fertilizer business in a way that may
differ from our best interests.
The
nitrogen fertilizer business will incur increased costs as a
result of being a publicly traded partnership.
As a subsidiary of a publicly traded partnership, the nitrogen
fertilizer business will incur significant legal, accounting and
other expenses that it did not incur prior to any such offering.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank
Act of 2010, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and the
New York Stock Exchange, require, or will require, publicly
traded entities to adopt various corporate governance practices
that will further increase its costs. Before it is able to make
distributions to us, it must first pay its expenses, including
the costs of being a public company and other operating
expenses. As a result,
20
the amount of cash it has available for distribution to us will
be affected by its expenses, including the costs associated with
being a publicly traded partnership. It is estimated that the
nitrogen fertilizer business will incur approximately
$3.5 million of estimated incremental costs per year, some
of which will be direct charges associated with being a publicly
traded partnership, and some of which will be allocated to the
nitrogen fertilizer business by us; however, it is possible that
the actual incremental costs of being a publicly traded
partnership will be higher than we currently estimate.
As a result of CVR Partners initial public offering, which
closed in April 2011, the nitrogen fertilizer business is now
subject to the public reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
These requirements will increase legal and financial compliance
costs and will make compliance activities more time-consuming
and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a publicly
traded partnership, the board of directors of the general
partner of the Partnership will be required to have at least
three independent directors by April 7, 2012 (it currently
has two). In addition, the Partnership will be required to adopt
policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and
procedures, including the preparation of reports on internal
control over financial reporting.
As a
stand-alone public company, the nitrogen fertilizer business
will be exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls
required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
The nitrogen fertilizer business is in the process of evaluating
its internal controls systems to allow management to report on,
and our independent auditors to audit, its internal control over
financial reporting. It will be performing the system and
process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation)
required to comply with the management certification and auditor
attestation requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, and under current rules will be required to comply with
Section 404 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Furthermore, upon completion of this process, the nitrogen
fertilizer business may identify control deficiencies of varying
degrees of severity under applicable SEC and Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, rules and regulations that
remain unremediated. Although the nitrogen fertilizer business
produces financial statements in accordance with
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP), internal accounting controls may not
currently meet all standards applicable to companies with
publicly traded securities. As a publicly traded partnership, it
will be required to report, among other things, control
deficiencies that constitute a material weakness or
changes in internal controls that, or that are reasonably likely
to, materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
If the nitrogen fertilizer business fails to implement the
requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, it might be
subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities
such as the SEC. If it does not implement improvements to its
disclosure controls and procedures or to its internal controls
in a timely manner, its independent registered public accounting
firm may not be able to certify as to the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting pursuant to an audit
of its internal control over financial reporting. This may
subject the nitrogen fertilizer business to adverse regulatory
consequences or a loss of confidence in the reliability of its
financial statements. It could also suffer a loss of confidence
in the reliability of its financial statements if its
independent registered public accounting firm reports a material
weakness in its internal controls, if it does not develop and
maintain effective controls and procedures or if it is otherwise
unable to deliver timely and reliable financial information. Any
loss of confidence in the reliability of its financial
statements or other negative reaction to its failure to develop
timely or adequate disclosure controls and procedures or
internal controls could result in a decline in the price of its
common units, which would reduce the value of our investment in
the nitrogen fertilizer business. In addition, if the nitrogen
fertilizer business fails to remedy any material weakness, its
financial statements may be inaccurate, it may face restricted
access to the capital markets and the price of its common units
may be adversely affected, which would reduce the value of our
investment in the nitrogen fertilizer business.
21