SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS	ex32_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS	ex31_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS	ex31_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS	ex32_1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED:	March 31, 2011
	-------------------------

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:	000-50224
	------------------

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

MISSISSIPPI	64-0681198
(STATE OF INCORPORATION)	(I. R. S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)

295 HIGHWAY 6 WEST/ P. O. BOX 690
BATESVILLE, MISSISSIPPI	38606
--------------------------------------------------------	----------------------------------------------------------
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL	(ZIP CODE)
EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

662-563-9311

(ISSUER’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

NONE

(FORMER NAME, ADDRESS AND FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE ISSUER: (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.

[ X ] YES [ ] NO

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER OR A NON-ACCELERATED FILER. SEE DEFINITION OF “ACCELERATED FILER AND LARGE ACCELERATED FILER” IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. (CHECK ONE):

LARGE ACCELERATED FILER [ ] ACCELERATED FILER [ X ] NON-ACCELERATED FILER [ ]

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.)

[ ] YES [ X ] NO

INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF EACH OF THE ISSUER’S CLASSES OF COMMON STOCK AS OF MARCH 31, 2011.

TITLE	OUTSTANDING
COMMON STOCK, $5.00 PAR VALUE	2,883,209

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

FIRST QUARTER 2011 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	March 31, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010

	Consolidated Statements of Income
	Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
	Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Item 2.	Changes in Securities

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5.	Other Information

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM NO. 1

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollar amounts presented in thousands)
	(Unaudited)
	Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	16,523		$	14,822
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		955			442
Total cash and cash equivalents		17,478			15,264
Federal funds sold		38,270			31,270
Certificates of deposit with other banks		1,538			1,778
Securities available-for-sale		131,353			124,447
Securities held-to-maturity, estimated fair value of		43,667			33,095
$43,379 in 2011 and $32,541 in 2010
Securities, other		1,933			1,933
Total securities		176,953			159,475
Loans, less allowance for loan losses of
$4,809 in 2011 and $4,477 in 2010		241,751			243,287
Interest receivable		3,038			2,902
Premises and equipment		22,679			22,922
Other real estate		19,809			20,272
Intangible assets		3,874			3,874
Cash surrender value of life insurance		6,716			6,650
Customers' liability acceptances		1,126			1,142
Other assets		3,260			3,646
Total Assets	$	536,492		$	512,482
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	77,616		$	74,022
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		75,639			80,885
Other interest-bearing deposits		279,826			253,836
Total deposits		433,081			408,743
Interest payable		267			419
Acceptances outstanding		1,126			1,142
Borrowed funds		25,290			26,970
Other liabilities		3,997			3,295
Total Liabilities		463,761			440,569

Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock - $1,000 par value, 25,000 shares
authorized, 17,910 shares issued		17,805			17,742
Common stock - $5 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,890,811 shares issued		14,454			14,454
Surplus		38,518			40,733
Retained earnings (deficit)		461			(2,214	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,531			1,236
Treasury stock, at par, 7,602 shares		(38	)		(38	)
Total Shareholders' Equity		72,731			71,913
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	536,492		$	512,482

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollar amounts presented in thousands)
	(Unaudited)
	For the three months
	ended March 31,
	2011			2010
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans	$	3,468		$	3,701
Interest and dividends on securities		1,148			1,135
Federal funds sold		18			10
Other		1			27
Total interest income		4,635			4,873

INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits		604			862
Interest on borrowings		175			189
Total interest expense		779			1,051

Net Interest Income		3,856			3,822

Provision for loan losses		430			276
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses		3,426			3,546

OTHER INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts		971			1,044
Trust Department income		224			231
Other income		399			219
Total other income		1,594			1,494

OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		2,519			2,623
Occupancy expense		563			603
Other operating expense		1,346			1,188
Total other expenses		4,428			4,414

INCOME BEFORE PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES		592			626

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES		(36	)		11

NET INCOME		628			615
Preferred Dividends		(167	)		(289	)

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO
COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	461		$	326

BASIC NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.16		$	0.11


SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollar amounts presented in thousands)

	(Unaudited)
	For the three months
	ended March 31,
		2011		2010

Net income		$	628	$	615

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Unrealized holding gains/(losses)			295		585

Comprehensive Income		$	923	$	1,200

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollar amounts presented in thousands)
	(Unaudited)
	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
NET INCOME	$	628		$	615
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		430			276
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net		429			379
Depreciation and amortization		302			305
FHLB stock dividend		(1	)		(2	)
(Gain) loss on sale/disposal of other assets, net		(34	)		(18	)
Changes in:
Interest receivable		(136	)		81
Cash value of life insurance, net		(66	)		(56	)
Other assets		436			(55	)
Interest payable		(152	)		(112	)
Other liabilities		496			832
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,332			2,245

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(12,626	)		(32,161	)
Proceeds of maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale		5,847			11,962
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity		(13,278	)		-
Proceeds of maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity		2,620			245
Additions to premises and equipment		(27	)		(8	)
Proceeds from sale of other assets		808			464
Changes in:
Loans		730			3,055
Federal funds sold		(7,000	)		(17,450	)
Certificates of deposits with other banks		240			-
Net cash used in investing activities		(22,686	)		(33,893	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(90	)		(229	)
Changes in:
Deposits		24,338			33,474
Repayment of debt		(2,044	)		(2,194	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		364			382
Net cash provided by financing activities		22,568			31,433

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,214			(215	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		15,264			17,045

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	17,478		$	16,830

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	931		$	1,163
Income taxes		-			-

Non-cash activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate and repossessed inventory	$	422		$	723

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. For further information, please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 15, 2011, which includes the consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE B – SUMMARY OF ORGANIZATION

Security Capital Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated September 16, 1982, under the laws of the State of Mississippi for the purpose of acquiring First Security Bank and serving as a one-bank holding company.

First Security Bank (the “Bank” or the “subsidiary Bank”) and Batesville Security Building Corporation are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

First Security Bank was originally chartered under the laws of the State of Mississippi on October 25, 1951, and engages in a wide range of commercial banking activities and emphasizes its local management, decision-making and ownership. The Bank offers a full range of banking services designed to meet the basic financial needs of its customers. These services include checking accounts, NOW accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, and individual retirement accounts. The Bank also offers a wide range of personal and corporate trust services and commercial, agricultural, mortgage and personal loans. First Security Bank has branch locations in the following Mississippi communities: Batesville, Pope, Sardis, Como, Crenshaw, Tunica, Hernando, Marks, Olive Branch, Robinsonville, Southaven and Barton.

Batesville Security Building Corporation, the non-bank subsidiary, was chartered under the laws of the State of Mississippi on June 23, 1971, generally, to deal in and manage real estate and personal property.

NOTE C – SECURITIES

A summary of amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, follows:

Securities
Amortized Cost and Fair Values

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
March 31, 2011
Securities available-for-sale:
U. S. Government agencies	$	27,659	$	43	$	100	$	27,602
Mortgage-backed securities		40,615		1,629		64		42,180
State and local political subdivisions		60,635		1,190		269		61,556
Other equity securities		4		11		-		15

	$	128,913	$	2,873	$	433	$	131,353

Securities held-to-maturity:
U. S. Government agencies	$	35,221	$	17	$	421	$	34,817
State and local political subdivisions		8,446		119		3		8,562
	$	43,667	$	136	$	424	$	43,379

December 31, 2010
Securities available-for-sale:
U. S. Government agencies	$	21,242	$	51	$	143	$	21,150
Mortgage-backed securities		41,733		1,688		112		43,309
State and local political subdivisions		59,497		929		451		59,975
Other equity securities		4		9		-		13

	$	122,476	$	2,677	$	706	$	124,447

Securities held-to-maturity:
U. S. Government agencies	$	25,578	$	5	$	600	$	24,983
State and local political subdivisions		7,517		84		43		7,558
	$	33,095	$	89	$	643	$	32,541

The details concerning securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity with unrealized losses as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were as follows:

Securities
Unrealized Losses < and > 12 Months

Available-for-Sale


	Losses < 12 Months				Losses 12 Months or >				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
March 31, 2011
U. S. Government
agencies	$	17,217	$	101	$	-	$	-	$	17,217	$	101
Mortgage-backed
securities		11,830		63		-		-		11,830		63
State and local political
subdivisions		9,619		199		1,717		70		11,336		269
	$	38,666	$	363	$	1,717	$	70	$	40,383	$	433

December 31, 2010
U. S. Government
agencies	$	8,924	$	143	$	-	$	-	$	8,924	$	143
Mortgage-backed
securities		11,524		112		-		-		11,524		112
State and local political
subdivisions		17,202		369		1,236		82		18,438		451
	$	37,650	$	624	$	1,236	$	82	$	38,886	$	706

Held-to-Maturity

	Losses < 12 Months				Losses 12 Months or >				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
March 31, 2011
U. S. Government
agencies	$	29,786	$	421	$	-	$	-	$	29,786	$	421
State and local political
subdivisions		503		3		-		-		503		3
	$	30,289	$	424	$	-	$	-	$	30,289	$	424

December 31, 2010
U. S. Government
agencies	$	19,675	$	600	$	-	$	-	$	19,675	$	600
State and local political
subdivisions		2,144		43		-		-		2,144		43
	$	21,819	$	643	$	-	$	-	$	21,819	$	643

NOTE D - LOANS

Loans
Major Classifications

Major classifications of loans were as follows:
	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(In thousands)

Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	36,450		$	33,347
Real estate - construction and development		58,544			56,673
Real estate - mortgage		129,387			134,964
Installment loans to individuals		20,793			20,186
Other		1,386			2,594
		246,560			247,764
Less allowance for loan losses		(4,809	)		(4,477	)
	$	241,751		$	243,287

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,477		$	4,352
Provision for loan losses		430			276
Loans charged-off		(300	)		(711	)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off		202			226
Balance at end of period	$	4,809		$	4,143

The following table provides the ending balances in the Company’s loans and allowance for loan losses, broken down by portfolio segment as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The table also provides additional detail as to the amount of our loans and allowance that corresponds to individual versus collective impairment evaluation. The impairment evaluation corresponds to the Company’s systematic methodology for estimating its Allowance for Loan Losses.

March 31, 2011
			Installment		Commercial,
			and		Financial
	Real Estate		Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Loans
Individually evaluated	$	43,586	$	28	$	1,075	$	44,689
Collectively evaluated		144,345		22,151		35,375		201,871
Total	$	187,931	$	22,179	$	36,450	$	246,560

Allowance for Loan Losses
Individually evaluated	$	3,280	$	1	$	11	$	3,292
Collectively evaluated		1,076		235		206		1,517
Total	$	4,356	$	236	$	217	$	4,809

December 31, 2010
			Installment		Commercial,
			and		Financial
	Real Estate		Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Loans
Individually evaluated	$	44,284	$	28	$	950	$	45,262
Collectively evaluated		147,359		22,752		32,391		202,502
Total	$	191,643	$	22,780	$	33,341	$	247,764

Allowance for Loan Losses
Individually evaluated	$	2,870	$	1	$	8	$	2,879
Collectively evaluated		1,136		215		247		1,598
Total	$	4,006	$	216	$	255	$	4,477

At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, loans lines of $250,000 and greater, rated substandard or lower, were analyzed for impairment. The following is a summary comparison of the analysis for impairment.

	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In thousands)
Loans analyzed for impairment
without a valuation allowance	$	25,464,559	$	28,171,248
Loans analyzed for impairment
with a valuation allowance		19,224,857		17,090,793
Total impaired loans	$	44,689,416	$	45,262,041
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	3,292,000	$	2,879,000

The following table provides additional detail of loans lines of $250,000 and greater, rated substandard or lower which were analyzed for impairment and reflects the breakdown according to class as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The recorded investment included in the following table represents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loans, net of any deferred fees and costs. As a majority of these loans at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are on nonaccrual status, recorded investment excludes any insignificant amount of accrued interest receivable on loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing. The unpaid balance represents the recorded balance prior to any partial charge-offs.

March 31, 2011
							Average		Interest
							Recorded		Income
	Recorded		Unpaid		Related		Investment		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		YTD		YTD
	(In thousands)
Loans analyzed for
impairment with
no related allowance:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	772	$	772	$	-	$	761	$	10
Real estate-construction and development		17,163		17,163		-		17,262		171
Real estate-mortgage		7,530		7,530		-		7,474		86
Installment loans and other		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	25,465	$	25,465	$	-	$	25,497	$	267
Loans analyzed for
impairment with
a related allowance:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	283	$	303	$	11	$	319	$	3
Real estate-construction and development		12,687		12,687		2,085		12,486		65
Real estate-mortgage		6,226		6,502		1,195		6,000		32
Installment loans and other		28		28		1		28		-
Total	$	19,224	$	19,520	$	3,292	$	18,833	$	100
Total loans analyzed for
impairment:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	1,055	$	1,075	$	11	$	1,080	$	13
Real estate-construction and development		29,850		29,850		2,085		29,748		236
Real estate-mortgage		13,756		14,032		1,195		13,474		118
Installment loans and other		28		28		1		28		-
Total Impaired Loans	$	44,689	$	44,985	$	3,292	$	44,330	$	367

December 31, 2010
							Average		Interest
							Recorded		Income
	Recorded		Unpaid		Related		Investment		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		YTD		YTD
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans with
no related allowance:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	623	$	623	$	-	$	580	$	29
Real estate-construction and development	$	17,886	$	17,886		-		20,360		762
Real estate-mortgage	$	9,662	$	9,662		-		9,759		377
Installment loans and other	$	-	$	-		-		-		-
Total	$	28,171	$	28,171			$	30,699	$	1,168
Impaired loans with
a related allowance:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	327	$	347	$	8	$	338	$	12
Real estate-construction and development	$	12,030	$	12,030		1,667		10,788		364
Real estate-mortgage	$	4,706	$	4,982		1,203		4,784		192
Installment loans and other	$	28	$	28		1		31		1
Total	$	17,091	$	17,387	$	2,879	$	15,941	$	569
Total Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	950	$	970	$	8	$	918	$	41
Real estate-construction and development		29,916		29,916		1,667		31,148		1,126
Real estate-mortgage		14,368		14,644		1,203		14,543		569
Installment loans and other		28		28		1		31		1
Total Impaired Loans	$	45,262	$	45,558	$	2,879	$	46,640	$	1,737

The following table summarizes by class the Company’s loans classified as past due in excess of 30 days or more in addition to those loans classified as non-accrual:

March 31, 2011
			90 Days +
		30-89	Past Due
	Days Past		and Still		Non-Accrual		Total		Total
	Due		Accruing		Loans		Past Due		Loans
	(In thousands)

Commercial, financial	$	762	$	-	$	276	$	1,038	$	36,450
and agricultural
Real estate - construction
and development		722		-		4,626		5,348		58,544
Real estate - mortgage		3,247		-		4,633		7,880		129,387
Installment loans to individuals		688		-		87		775		20,793
Other		14		1		-		15		1,386
Total	$	5,433	$	1	$	9,622	$	15,056	$	246,560

December 31, 2010
			90 Days +
		30-89	Past Due
	Days Past		and Still		Non-Accrual		Total		Total
	Due		Accruing		Loans		Past Due		Loans
	(In thousands)

Commercial, financial	$	238	$	29	$	326	$	593	$	33,347
and agricultural
Real estate - construction
and development		1,016		-		3,856		4,872		56,673
Real estate - mortgage		2,070		-		5,237		7,307		134,964
Installment loans to individuals		842		-		165		1,007		20,186
Other		67		34		-		101		2,594
Total	$	4,233	$	63	$	9,584	$	13,880	$	247,764

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings, which are consistent with the definitions used in supervisory guidance:

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

March 31, 2011
	Real Estate				Installment
	Commercial &		Real Estate		and		Financial
	Development		Mortgage		Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Pass	$	16,181	$	101,386	$	21,071	$	27,229	$	165,867
Special Mention		11,742		11,131		614		7,653		31,140
Substandard		30,621		16,876		494		1,570		49,561
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		58,544		129,393		22,179		36,452		246,568
Less: Unearned
Discount		-		6		-		2		8
Loans, net of
unearned discount	$	58,544	$	129,387	$	22,179	$	36,450	$	246,560

December 31, 2010

	Real Estate				Installment		Commercial,
	Commercial &		Real Estate		and		Financial
	Development		Mortgage		Other		and Agriculture		Total
	(In thousands)
Pass	$	15,545	$	107,179	$	21,514	$	24,098	$	168,336
Special Mention		10,261		10,329		643		7,811		29,044
Substandard		30,867		17,456		623		1,443		50,389
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		56,673		134,964		22,780		33,352		247,769
Less: Unearned
Discount		-		-		-		5		5
Loans, net of
unearned discount	$	56,673	$	134,964	$	22,780	$	33,347	$	247,764

NOTE E – EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted per share data includes any dilution from potential common stock outstanding, such as the exercise of stock options. For the periods presented below, there were no potential dilutive common shares. All weighted average, actual shares or per share information in the financial statements have been adjusted retroactively for the effect of stock dividends.

For the Three Months Ended

March 31, 2011

Basic income

applicable to

common

shareholders

Per Share

(Numerator)

(Denominator)

Data

Basic per Share

461,265

2,883,209

0.16

For the Three Months Ended

March 31, 2010

Basic income

applicable to

common

shareholders

Per Share

(Numerator)

(Denominator)

Data

Basic per Share

326,518

2,883,159

0.11

NOTE F – FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Company follows the guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

ASC Topic 820 defines the fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:


	Level 1	Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

	Level 2	Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities which use observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities.

	Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets.

Available-for-Sale Securities

The fair value of available-for-sale securities is determined by various valuation methodologies. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1. The Company has no securities classified within Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 2 securities include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Company has no securities classified within Level 3.

The following table presents the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the ASC Topic 820 hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (in thousands):

	Quoted		Models with		Models with		Carrying
	market		significant		significant		value
	prices in		observable		unobservable		in the
	active		market		market		Balance
	markets		parameters		parameters		Sheet

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

March 31, 2011:
Available-for-sale securities
U. S. Government agencies	$	-	$	27,606	$	-	$	27,606
State and local political subdivisions		-		61,556		-		61,556
Mortgage-backed securities		-		42,191		-		42,191
	$	-	$	131,353	$	-	$	131,353

	Quoted		Models with		Models with		Carrying
	market		significant		significant		value
	prices in		observable		unobservable		in the
	active		market		market		Balance
	markets		parameters		parameters		Sheet

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

December 31, 2010:
Available-for-sale securities
U. S. Government agencies	$	-	$	21,164	$	-	$	21,164
State and local political subdivisions		-		59,975		-		59,975
Mortgage-backed securities		-		43,308		-		43,308
	$	-	$	124,447	$	-	$	124,447

There were no transfers of financial assets among Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during 2011.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

Impaired Loans

Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 310, Receivables. Allowable methods for estimating fair value include using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans or, where a loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, using the discounted cash flow method.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value. If the impaired loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, then the discounted cash flow method is used. This method requires the impaired loan to be recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate of a loan is the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs, premiums or discount existing at origination or acquisition of the loan. Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the ASC Topic 820 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (in thousands):

March 31, 2011

	Carrying		Quoted		Models with		Models with
	value		market		significant		significant
	in the		prices in		observable		unobservable
	Balance		active		market		market
	Sheet		markets		parameters		parameters

	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Impaired Loans
Real estate - construction
and development	$	12,687	$	-	$	-	$	12,687
Real estate - farmland		132		-		-		132
Real estate - 1-4 family
residential		4,019		-		-		4,019
Nonfarm/Nonresidential		2,208		-		-		2,208
Commerical and industrial		151		-		-		151
Consumer		28		-		-		28
Total impaired loans	$	19,225	$	-	$	-	$	19,225

December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Quoted		Models with		Models with
	value		market		significant		significant
	in the		prices in		observable		unobservable
	Balance		active		market		market
	Sheet		markets		parameters		parameters

	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Impaired Loans	$	17,091	$	-	$	-	$	17,091

Total loans analyzed for impairment had a carrying amount of $44,689,000 at March 31, 2011. Of this amount, $19,225,000 had a reserve allocated of $3,292,000. Total loans analyzed for impairment at December 31, 2010 totaled $45,262,000 of which $17,091,000 had a reserve allocated of $2,879,000.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned acquired through loan foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the allowance for loan losses. Due to the subjective nature of establishing the fair value when the asset is acquired, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned or foreclosed asset could differ from the original estimate. If it is determined the fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through non-interest expense. Operating costs associated with the assets after acquisition are also recorded as non-interest expense. Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets are netted and posted to other non-interest expense. Other real estate owned measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $9.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively, with the remainder carried at cost. Write-downs and sales resulted in a decrease of $843 thousand and $2.1 million in the three months ending March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Increases to other real estate owned occurred due to additional loan foreclosures and capital expenditures made to improve individual properties. These increases totaled $380 thousand for the period ending March 31, 2011 and $892 thousand for the period ending March 31, 2010.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of other real estate measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the ASC Topic 820 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (in thousands):

March 31, 2011

Carrying

Quoted

Models with

value

market

significant

in the

prices in

observable

unobservable

Balance

active

market

Sheet

markets

parameters

Fair Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Other real estate owned

9,765

December 31, 2010

Carrying

Quoted

Models with

value

market

significant

in the

prices in

observable

unobservable

Balance

active

market

Sheet

markets

parameters

Fair Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Other real estate owned

8,233

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with ASC Topic 825 Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – For such short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities – For securities held as investments, fair value equals market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Fair value of other securities, which consist of FHLB and First National Banker’s Bankshares, is estimated to be the carrying value, which is par.

Loans – The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Deposits – The fair values of demand deposits are, as required by ASC Topic 825, equal to the carrying value of such deposits. Demand deposits include noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and money market demand accounts. The fair value of variable rate term deposits, those repricing within six months or less, approximates the carrying value of these deposits. Discounted cash flows have been used to value fixed rate term deposits and variable rate term deposits repricing after six months. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered on comparable deposits as to amount and term.

FHLB and Other Borrowings – The fair value of the fixed rate borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flows, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount of any variable rate borrowings approximates their fair values.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments – Fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements. However, commitments to extend credit do not represent a significant value until such commitments are funded or closed. Management has determined that these instruments do not have a distinguishable fair value and no fair value has been assigned.

The estimated fair values of the financial instruments, none of which are held for trading purposes, were as follows:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,478	$	17,478	$	15,264	$	15,264
Federal funds sold		38,270		38,269		31,270		31,269
Certificates of deposit with
other banks		1,538		1,538		1,778		1,778
Securities available-for-sale		131,353		131,353		124,447		124,447
Securities held-to-maturity		43,667		43,379		33,095		32,541
Securities, other		1,933		1,933		1,933		1,933
Loans		246,560		248,684		247,764		249,898
Financial liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits		77,616		60,830		74,022		58,013
Interest-bearing deposits		355,465		338,515		334,721		318,760
FHLB and other borrowings		25,290		26,885		26,970		28,671

NOTE G – NON-PERFORMING ASSETS

Risk of nonpayment exists with respect to all loans, which could result in the classification of such loans as non-performing. At March 31, 2011, NPA balances were comparable to year-end 2010 primarily due to the continued effect of the adverse economy and real estate downturn on residential land development and construction loan portfolios.

The Company has a significant concentration in real estate lending, including loans to real estate developers secured by real estate located in Desoto County, Mississippi. Declining real estate values and a severe constriction in the availability of mortgage financing has negatively impacted real estate sales, which has resulted in customers' inability to repay loans. In addition, the value of collateral underlying such loans has decreased materially. During 2011, the Company has continued to experience significant levels of non-performing assets relating to real estate lending, primarily in our residential real estate portfolio.

As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $5.0 million identified as Troubled Debt Restructured ("TDR") assets. At December 31, 2010, the Company had $5.01 million TDR assets. The Company’s policy in managing TDRs is to include the asset in NPAs and reserve appropriately with management working with the borrower on a plan to either return the obligation to an accruing status or take appropriate measures to secure the collateral for disposition.

The following table presents information with respect to non-performing assets at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands, except for selected ratios):


	Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,		Sept. 30,		Jun. 30,
	2011		2010		2010		2010
Loans on non-accrual status	$	9,622	$	9,584	$	12,268	$	13,169
Loans past due 90 days or more but
not non-accrual status		1		63		27		104
OREO - non-performing		16,424		16,887		16,691		15,853
Total NPAs	$	26,047	$	26,534	$	28,986	$	29,126

Operating commercial real
estate OREO	$	3,385	$	3,385	$	3,450	$	3,536
OREO - non-performing		16,424		16,887		16,691		15,853
Total OREO	$	19,809	$	20,272	$	20,141	$	19,389

Selected ratios:
NPLs to total gross loans		3.903		3.894		4.808		5.088
NPAs to total gross loans and OREO		9.779		9.899		10.489		10.392
NPAs to total assets		4.855		5.178		5.556		5.503

NOTE H – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

The following tables reflect the activity in the asset, income and expense accounts during the three month periods ending March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011. The first table summarizes the activity in the other real estate asset account. Additions to other real estate owned include property gained through loan foreclosures as well as capital expenditures since foreclosure. Sales proceeds represent amounts received on a completion of a sale of property as well as lease purchase payments. Losses and gains are recognized on the closing of a sale of property and write-downs are incurred as the value reflected on recent appraisals fall below the carrying value of the property. The second table shows the costs of holding the properties as well as the net losses incurred on the disposition of the properties.

CHANGES IN CARRYING VALUE OF ORE

Balance as of December 31, 2009:		$	20,770
Additions to OREO			892
Sales Proceeds			(2,033	)
Losses and write-downs, net of gains			(155	)
Balance as of March 31, 2010:		$	19,474

Balance as of December 31, 2010:		$	20,272
Additions to OREO			380
Sales Proceeds			(708	)
Losses and write-downs, net of gains			(135	)
Balance as of March 31, 2011:		$	19,809


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010

Writedowns, net of gains on sale	$ 135	$	155
Operating expenses, net of rental income	1		101
Total expenses related to foreclosed assets	$ 136	$	256

NOTE I – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated the effects of subsequent events on these financial statements through the date the financial statements were issued.

NOTE J – RECLASSIFICATION

Certain amounts in the 2010 financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.

ITEM NO. 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion contains “forward-looking statements” relating to, without limitation, future economic performance, plan and objectives of management for future operations, and projections of revenues and other financial items that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company’s management. The words “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” and “believe,” as well as similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company’s actual results may differ and the Company’s operating performance each quarter is subject to various risks and uncertainties that are discussed in detail in the Company’s filing of the Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, contained in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.

Economic Conditions:

The Company's business is affected by the economy of the Desoto County area in northern Mississippi, which is adjacent to Memphis, Tennessee. The uncertain depth and duration of the present economic downturn could continue to cause further deterioration of the local economy in Desoto County, resulting in an adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Real estate values in this area have declined and may continue to fall. Unemployment rates in this area remain elevated and could increase further. Business activity in the real estate development has been impacted and local governments and many businesses are facing serious challenges due to the lack of consumer spending driven by the elevated unemployment and uncertainty.

The Company’s financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the declining value of collateral securing those loans, is reflective of the business environment in the markets where the Company operates. The present significant downturn in economic activity and declining real estate values has had a direct and adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This is particularly evident in the residential land development and residential construction segments of the Company’s loan portfolio. Developers or home builders whose cash flows are dependent on the sale of lots or completed residences have reduced ability to service their loan obligations and the market value of underlying collateral has been and continues to be adversely affected. The impact on the Company has been an elevated level of impaired loans, an associated increase in the provision for loan losses expense and charge-offs for the Company leading to a decrease in net income. The local and regional economy also has a direct impact on the volume of bank deposits.

On June 26, 2009, the Company completed a transaction with the United States Treasury Department (the “Treasury”) under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (the “TARP CPP”). The Company issued 17,388 shares of its Series UST, Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock. In addition, the Treasury received a warrant to purchase 522 shares of the Company’s Series UST/W, Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, which was immediately exercised by the Treasury for a nominal exercise price. The Series UST Preferred Stock is a senior cumulative perpetual preferred stock that has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. Dividends are payable quarterly. The Series UST Preferred Stock is generally non-voting. The Series UST/W Preferred Stock is a cumulative perpetual preferred stock that has the same rights, preferences, privileges, voting rights and other terms as the Series UST Preferred Stock, except that dividends will be paid at the rate of 9% per year. The aggregate sales price of the Series UST Preferred Stock and warrant to purchase Series UST/W Preferred Stock was $17,388,000. The securities offered and sold in the TARP CPP transaction were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance upon the exemption provided under Section 4(2) of that Act for transactions not involving any public offering.

On September 29, 2010, the Company closed a transaction whereby the Treasury exchanged its 17,910 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series UST and Series UST/W for 17,910 shares of a new series of preferred stock designated Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CD (the “CDCI Preferred Shares”). As a result of the Exchange, the Company is no longer participating in the TARP Capital Purchase Program being administered by Treasury and is now participating in Treasury’s TARP Community Development Capital Initiative (the “CDFI”). In comparison with the rates required by the TARP CPP, the CDCI Preferred Shares entitle the holder to an annual dividend of 2% of the liquidation value of the shares, payable quarterly in arrears, for a period of eight years or until repayment of the principal, whichever expires first. If the principal remains outstanding at the end of eight years, the annual dividend rate will rise to 9%. In addition, if the Company fails to retain its certification as a Community Development Financial Institution, the annual rate will be 5% when noncompliance exceeds 180 days and 9% for noncompliance exceeding 270 days. Certification requires the Company to have a primary mission of promoting community development in targeted areas with a goal to serve the “unserved” markets.

The subsidiary Bank represents the primary assets of the Company. On March 31, 2011, First Security Bank had approximately $523.3 million in assets compared to $509.9 million at March 31, 2010. Loans decreased to $240.0 million at March 31, 2011, from $258.5 million at March 31, 2010. Deposits increased by $15.4 million from March 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011, for a total of $434.5 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2010, the Bank reported net income of approximately $744,062 and $642,071, respectively.

CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

The cash and cash equivalents of $17.5 million at March 31, 2011, reflected an increase of $2.2 million from the cash position of $15.3 million at December 31, 2010. This increase is attributed to a seasonal fluctuation in normal bank transactions. The cash management team readily invests available cash and assesses the investment tools for the most desirable yield and the funding needs of the Company.

The earning assets at December 31, 2010, were $420.0 million and at March 31, 2011, were $436.6 million. The increase is attributable to the growth in short-term investments such as fed funds sold and growth in investment securities. The premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, at March 31, 2011, totaled approximately $22.7 million – reflecting a decrease of $243 thousand for the first three months in 2011. Investment securities were $175.0 million at March 31, 2011. Other assets were $3.2 million at March 31, 2011 and $3.6 million at December 31, 2010.

Deposit liabilities of $433.0 million at March 31, 2011, reflected an increase of $24.3 million from the $408.7 million at December 31, 2010. The fluctuation in deposits during the first three months is attributable to a normal seasonal increase and an increase in public funds. An increase in deposits decreases the amount of long-term borrowings and short-term borrowings needed for funding investments in loans and facilities. Short-term borrowings provide a tool in providing the funding for unforeseen deposit withdrawals and seasonal loan demands. Due to the increase in deposits, the need for short-term funding was eliminated at March 31, 2011.

The net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2010, was $1.2 million. At March 31, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive income reflected a net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities of $1.5 million. The change over these reporting periods reflects the nature of the market. The changes in the market affected accumulated other comprehensive income with a net after tax increase of $295 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and $585 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

The consolidated statements of cash flows summarize the changes in the financial condition of the Company. The following identify some of the changes for the three months ended March 31, 2011: purchase of available-for-sale securities totaling $17.5 million and purchases of held-to-maturity securities totaling $8.4 million; maturities, calls and pay-downs of securities of available-for-sale securities totaling $7.7 million and $982 thousand in held-to-maturity securities; an increase of $24 million in deposits; and an increase of $7 million in federal funds sold.

PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The Company has developed policies and procedures for evaluating the overall quality of its credit portfolio and the timely identification of potential problem loans. On a quarterly basis, the Company’s Board of Directors reviews and approves the appropriate level for the Company’s allowance for loan losses based upon management’s recommendations, the results of the internal monitoring and reporting system, and an analysis of economic conditions in its market. The Company has implemented an improved loan review program, which includes an internal loan review officer position and the engagement of an external loan review firm and the establishment of a new system for tracking borrower financial statements and the structure of our watch reports.

Additions to the allowance for loan losses, which are expensed through the provision for loan losses on the Company’s income statement, are made periodically to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level based on management’s analysis of the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Loan losses and recoveries are charged or credited directly to the allowance. The amount of the provision is a function of the level of loans outstanding, the level of non-performing loans, historical loan loss experience, the amount of loan losses actually charged against the allowance during a given period, and current and anticipated economic conditions.

The Company’s allowance for loan losses is based upon judgments and assumptions about risk elements in the portfolio, trends in past due loans and charge offs, local and national economic conditions, and other factors affecting borrowers. The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses includes identification and analysis of loss potential in various portfolio segments utilizing a credit risk grading process and historical loss factors and specific reviews and evaluations of significant problem credits. An appropriate allowance for loan losses covers estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans that are determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. However, there is no precise method of estimating credit losses, since any estimate of loan losses is necessarily subjective. If charge-offs in future periods increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses, which would decrease our net income and possibly our capital.

In addition, the downturn in the real estate market has resulted in an increase in loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and we believe these trends are likely to continue. In some cases, this downturn has resulted in a significant impairment to the value of our collateral and the subsidiary Bank’s ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure, and there is a risk that this trend will continue. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If real estate values continue to decline, it is also more likely that the Bank would be required to increase the allowance for loan losses. The value of real estate collateral is determined by using a current appraisal. Contrary to any other relevant information an appraisal is considered current if it is less than 12 months old except when economic or market changes have caused values to rise or fall significantly. If a current appraisal is not maintained, the Bank will generally order a new appraisal prior to accepting the property as a result of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or completion of a foreclosure action. Based on present information and an ongoing evaluation, management considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to meet presently known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment about the adequacy of the allowance is based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which it believes to be reasonable but which may or may not be accurate. Estimated credit losses means an estimate of the current amount of loans that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect given facts and circumstances as of the evaluation date. Thus, estimated credit losses represent net charge-offs that are likely to be realized for a loan or group of loans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will not be required, especially considering the overall weakness in the commercial real estate market in our market areas. The Company does not allocate the allowance for loan losses to specific categories of loans but evaluates the adequacy on an overall portfolio basis utilizing a risk grading system.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND RISK ELEMENTS

Diversification within the loan portfolio is an important means of reducing inherent lending risks. The loan portfolio is represented by the following mix: Commercial 7.77%; Agricultural 1.68%; Real Estate 81.66%; Consumer 8.37% and Other .52%. The major components of the real estate loans are 27.35% for construction and land development property, 6.07% for farmland, 37.84% for first liens on 1-4 family residential property, .36% for multi-family property and 28.38% for nonfarm and nonresidential property.

At March 31, 2011, the subsidiary Bank had loans past due as follows:

	(in thousands)
Past due 30 days through 89 days	$ 5,606
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing	$ 1

The accrual of interest is discontinued on loans which become ninety days past due unless the loans are adequately secured and in the process of collection. The non-accrual loans at March 31, 2011, totaled $9.6 million. Any other real estate owned is carried at lower of cost or current appraised value less cost to dispose. Other real estate at March 31, 2011, totaled $19.8 million. A loan is classified as a restructured loan when the interest rate is materially reduced or the term is extended beyond the original maturity date because of the inability of the borrower to service the debt under the original terms. The subsidiary Bank had $5.0 million in restructured loans as of March 31, 2011.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company experienced $300 thousand in charge-offs of loans and $202 thousand in recoveries of loans for a net decrease effect to the allowance for loan losses of $98 thousand. The net charge-offs represent .41% of average loans. Of the $300 thousand charge to the allowance for loan losses, the breakdown, per loan category, is: 1% for construction and land development; 27% for 1-4 family residential loans; 3% for commercial loans and 69% for consumer loans. Consumer loan collections of $184 thousand represent the major component of the $202 thousand in recoveries.

LIQUIDITY

The Company has an asset and liability management program that assists management in maintaining net interest margins during times of both rising and falling interest rates and in maintaining sufficient liquidity. The asset and liability reports for March 31, 2011, substantiate that the Company remains in a neutral position to changes in rates. A 1% increase or decrease in market rates will basically not affect net interest income. The Company’s policy allows for no more than a 10% movement in NII (net interest income) in a 200 basis point ramp of market rates over a one-year period. When funds exceed the needs for reserve requirements or short-term liquidity needs, the Company will increase its security investments or invest in federal funds. It is management’s policy to maintain an adequate portion of its portfolio of assets and liabilities on a short-term basis to ensure rate flexibility and to meet loan funding and liquidity needs.

The financial status at March 31, 2011, reflects a net interest margin of 3.411. This ratio is consistent with prior periods and represents the continuing effort of management in managing the rates and the funding. At March 31, 2011, the regulatory liquidity ratio of 44.81% is well within the Bank’s policy requirement of a minimum liquidity ratio of 15%. In addition, the core deposits represent 67.54% of total assets and temporary investments represent 19.93% of total assets and volatile liabilities represent 1.55% of total assets.

The company’s participation in the United States Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program (CPP) contributed to the excellent liquidity status reflected in the ratios listed below. The CPP funds were invested at March 31, 2011 in short-term products in anticipation of a recovery in the market.

At March 31, 2011, the tools to meet funding needs are the secured and unsecured lines of credit with the correspondent banks totaling $22 million (to borrow federal funds) and a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $109.9 million. At March 31, 2011, the Company had available (unused) lines of credit of approximately $119.5 million.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Total consolidated equity capital at March 31, 2011, was $72.7 million or approximately 13.56% of total assets. The main source of capital for the Company has been the retention of net income.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Leverage Capital. The Company and the Bank have adequate capital positions as of March 31, 2011, as reflected below:

	Company	Bank
Risk-Based Capital Ratio	Ratio	Ratio	Requirements
Total Capital	22.51%	18.55%	8%
Tier 1 Capital	21.26%	17.29%	4%
Leverage Capital	13.27%	10.31%	4%

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – YEAR-TO-DATE

The consolidated net income for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $628 thousand which reflects an increase of $13 thousand in consolidated net income for the same period in 2010. The increase in the consolidated net income can be attributed mainly to a decrease in interest expense.

Interest income decreased to $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, indicating a decrease of $238 thousand from the $4.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in interest income signifies the management decision to decrease the rate pricing of the loan products. This decision was stimulated by current market conditions.

Interest expense reflects a decrease of $272 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $1.1 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease in interest expense can be attributed to the low rates that existed during the period ended March 31, 2011.

The increase in the provision for loan losses of $154 thousand is attributed to the evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio and the quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses, which determine the requirements for and the adequacy of the provision.

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $1.6 million, which is an increase of $100 thousand from the income for the same period in 2010. The service charges on deposit accounts, for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2010, were $971 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively.

Other expenses, consisting primarily of salaries, employee benefits and occupancy expense, for the three months ended March 31, 2011, reveal an increase of $14 thousand or .32% from the same period in 2010. Salaries and employee benefits of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, represent the largest component of other expenses and the small decrease represents a conservative response to the 2010 Bank performance and the current economy.

Income tax benefit of $36 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011, reflects an increase of $47 thousand from the same period in 2010.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance requires increased fair value disclosures. There are two components to the increased disclosure requirements set forth in the update: (1) a description of, as well as the disclosure of, the dollar amount of transfers in or out of level one or level two and (2) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, gross amounts shall be disclosed as opposed to a single net figure). Increased disclosures regarding the transfers in/out of level one and two were required for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Increased disclosures regarding the level three fair value reconciliation are required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. Where necessary, the Company has added the required disclosures to our financial statement footnotes.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This standard modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. This guidance provides clarification regarding the acquisition date that should be used for reporting the pro forma financial information disclosures required by Topic 805 when comparative financial statements are presented. ASU 2010-29 also requires entities to provide a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments that are directly attributable to the business combination. ASU 2010-29 is effective for the Company prospectively for business combinations occurring after December 15, 2010.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings. The accounting standard was an update to amend previous guidance with respect to troubled debt restructurings. This updated guidance is designed to assist creditors with determining whether or not a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. In particular, additional guidance has been added to help creditors determine whether a concession has been granted and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Both of these conditions are required to be met for a restructuring to constitute a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in the update are effective for the first interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the possible effects of this guidance on its financial statement disclosures.

ITEM NO. 3

QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in market risk exposures that affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented as of December 31, 2010, in the Company’s Form 10-K and Annual Report.

ITEM NO. 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Within 90 days prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation under the direction and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer was performed to determine the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures. The principal executive officer and the principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors subsequent to the date of the evaluation that could significantly affect these controls.

PART II--

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Out of the normal course of business, First Security Bank may be a defendant in a lawsuit. In regard to any legal proceedings, which occurred during the reporting period, management expects no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM NO. 1A RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes to the Company’s risk factors from what was previously disclosedin the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 2.

CHANGES IN SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 3.

DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

Exhibits

Exhibit No. 31.1 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 31.2 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 32.1 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 32.2 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)

The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

BY /s/ Frank West	BY /s/ Connie Woods Hawkins
Frank West	Connie Woods Hawkins
President and Chief Executive Officer	Executive Vice-President, Cashier
	and Chief Financial Officer



DATE: May 9, 2011	DATE: May 9, 2011

SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS - FORM 10-Q - May 9, 2011

Attached files

SECURITY CAPITAL CORP/MS Reports