Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Archrock Partners, L.P. | h81866exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Archrock Partners, L.P. | h81866exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Archrock Partners, L.P. | h81866exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Archrock Partners, L.P. | h81866exv32w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 001-33078
EXTERRAN
PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
22-3935108 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
16666 Northchase Drive Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
77060 (Zip Code) |
(281) 836-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated
filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 28, 2011, there were 27,407,215 common units and 4,743,750 subordinated units
outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit amounts)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for unit amounts)
(unaudited)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15 | $ | 50 | ||||
Accounts receivable, trade, net of allowance of $1,007 and $1,232, respectively |
25,128 | 24,550 | ||||||
Due from affiliates, net |
7,553 | 3,759 | ||||||
Total current assets |
32,696 | 28,359 | ||||||
Compression equipment |
925,319 | 953,759 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(296,065 | ) | (316,806 | ) | ||||
Net compression equipment |
629,254 | 636,953 | ||||||
Goodwill |
124,019 | 124,019 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps |
7,304 | 5,769 | ||||||
Intangibles and other assets, net |
18,532 | 18,245 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 811,805 | $ | 813,345 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable, trade |
$ | 175 | $ | 166 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
8,812 | 9,347 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
842 | 983 | ||||||
Current portion of interest rate swaps |
3,284 | 3,112 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
13,113 | 13,608 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
450,000 | 449,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
463,113 | 462,608 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
||||||||
Partners capital: |
||||||||
Limited partner units: |
||||||||
Common units, 27,407,215 and 27,363,451 units issued and outstanding, respectively |
373,519 | 379,748 | ||||||
Subordinated units, 4,743,750 units issued and outstanding |
(30,269 | ) | (30,702 | ) | ||||
General partner units, 2% interest with 653,318 equivalent units issued and outstanding |
10,733 | 10,638 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(4,736 | ) | (8,673 | ) | ||||
Treasury units, 25,601 and 15,756 common units, respectively |
(555 | ) | (274 | ) | ||||
Total partners capital |
348,692 | 350,737 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 811,805 | $ | 813,345 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 68,729 | $ | 52,710 | ||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) |
37,052 | 25,851 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,149 | 11,878 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
10,216 | 7,695 | ||||||
Interest expense |
7,075 | 5,692 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(221 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
Total costs and expenses |
68,271 | 51,111 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
458 | 1,599 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
235 | 173 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
General partner interest in net income |
$ | 572 | $ | 340 | ||||
Common units interest in net income |
$ | (297 | ) | $ | 798 | |||
Subordinated units interest in net income |
$ | (52 | ) | $ | 288 | |||
Weighted average common units outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
27,363 | 17,546 | ||||||
Diluted |
27,363 | 17,551 | ||||||
Weighted average subordinated units outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
4,744 | 6,325 | ||||||
Diluted |
4,744 | 6,325 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
Diluted |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
Earnings (loss) per subordinated unit: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
Diluted |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||
Interest rate swap gain (loss) |
1,363 | (174 | ) | |||||
Amortization of payments to terminate interest rate swaps |
2,574 | | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 4,160 | $ | 1,252 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(In thousands, except for unit amounts)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(In thousands, except for unit amounts)
(unaudited)
Partners Capital | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Partner | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Units | Subordinated Units | Units | Treasury Units | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | Units | $ | Units | $ | Units | $ | Units | Loss | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
$ | 298,010 | 17,541,965 | $ | (33,194 | ) | 6,325,000 | $ | 8,457 | 486,243 | $ | (108 | ) | (8,426 | ) | $ | (14,857 | ) | $ | 258,308 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common units for
vesting of phantom units |
33,373 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury units purchased |
(166 | ) | (7,330 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction costs for the
public offering of common
units by Exterran Holdings |
(4 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution of capital |
2,914 | 2,011 | 139 | 5,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions |
(8,112 | ) | (2,925 | ) | (543 | ) | (11,580 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit based compensation expense |
185 | 185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap loss |
(174 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
798 | 288 | 340 | 1,426 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
$ | 293,791 | 17,575,338 | $ | (33,822 | ) | 6,325,000 | $ | 8,393 | 486,243 | $ | (274 | ) | (15,756 | ) | $ | (15,031 | ) | $ | 253,057 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Partners Capital | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Partner | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Units | Subordinated Units | Units | Treasury Units | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | Units | $ | Units | $ | Units | $ | Units | Loss | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 379,748 | 27,363,451 | $ | (30,702 | ) | 4,743,750 | $ | 10,638 | 653,318 | $ | (274 | ) | (15,756 | ) | $ | (8,673 | ) | $ | 350,737 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common units for
vesting of phantom units |
43,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury units purchased |
(281 | ) | (9,845 | ) | (281 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction costs for the
public offering of common
units by Exterran Holdings |
(261 | ) | (261 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution of capital |
6,890 | 2,726 | 360 | 9,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions |
(12,925 | ) | (2,241 | ) | (837 | ) | (16,003 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit based compensation expense |
364 | 364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap gain |
1,363 | 1,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of payments to
terminate interest rate swaps |
2,574 | 2,574 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
(297 | ) | (52 | ) | 572 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
$ | 373,519 | 27,407,215 | $ | (30,269 | ) | 4,743,750 | $ | 10,733 | 653,318 | $ | (555 | ) | (25,601 | ) | $ | (4,736 | ) | $ | 348,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,149 | 11,878 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance cost |
294 | 235 | ||||||
Amortization of fair value of acquired interest rate swaps |
| 37 | ||||||
Amortization of payments to terminate interest rate swaps |
2,574 | | ||||||
Unit based compensation expense |
364 | 190 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
33 | | ||||||
Gain on sale of compression equipment |
(212 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade |
(611 | ) | 2,744 | |||||
Accounts payable, trade |
9 | 109 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(936 | ) | (830 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
15,887 | 15,773 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,891 | ) | (2,570 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of compression equipment |
1,036 | 530 | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
| (1,111 | ) | |||||
Increase in amounts due from affiliates, net |
(2,932 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(8,787 | ) | (3,595 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Borrowings under long-term debt |
300,000 | 7,000 | ||||||
Repayments under long-term debt |
(299,000 | ) | (9,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions to unitholders |
(16,003 | ) | (11,580 | ) | ||||
Debt issuance costs |
(980 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of treasury units |
(281 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||
Capital contribution from limited partners and general partner |
9,129 | 2,794 | ||||||
Decrease in amounts due to affiliates, net |
| (1,293 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(7,135 | ) | (12,245 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(35 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
50 | 203 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 15 | $ | 136 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Non-cash capital contribution from limited and general partner |
$ | 361 | $ | 428 | ||||
Non-cash capital contribution for contract operations equipment acquired/exchanged, net |
$ | 486 | $ | 1,842 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
7
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Exterran Partners, L.P.
(we, or the Partnership) included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.) for interim financial
information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) are not required in
these interim financial statements and have been condensed or omitted. It is the opinion of
management that the information furnished includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, that are necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. That report contains a more comprehensive summary of our accounting policies. These interim
results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
Exterran General Partner, L.P. is our general partner and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Exterran Holdings, Inc. (individually, and together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Exterran
Holdings). As Exterran General Partner, L.P. is a limited partnership, its general partner,
Exterran GP LLC, conducts our business and operations, and the board of directors and officers of
Exterran GP LLC make decisions on our behalf.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist of cash, trade receivables and payables, interest rate swaps and
long-term debt. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values of such
financial instruments approximated their carrying values as reflected in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. The fair value of our debt has been estimated based on similar debt transactions
that occurred near the valuation date.
Earnings Per Common and Subordinated Unit
The computations of earnings per common and subordinated unit are based on the weighted average
number of common and subordinated units, respectively, outstanding during the applicable period.
Our subordinated units meet the definition of a participating security and therefore we are
required to use the two-class method in the computation of earnings per unit. Basic earnings per
common and subordinated unit are determined by dividing net income allocated to the common units
and subordinated units, respectively, after deducting the amount allocated to our general partner
(including distributions to our general partner on its incentive distribution rights), by the
weighted average number of outstanding common and subordinated units, respectively, during the
period.
When computing earnings per common and subordinated unit under the two-class method in periods when
distributions are greater than
earnings the amount of the incentive distribution rights
is deducted from net income and allocated to our general partner for the period to which the
calculation relates. The remaining amount of net income, after deducting the incentive distribution
rights, is allocated between the general partner, common and subordinated units based on how our
partnership agreement allocates net losses.
When computing earnings per common and subordinated unit under the two-class method in periods when
earnings are greater than distributions, earnings are allocated to the general partner, common and
subordinated units based on how our partnership agreement would allocate earnings if the full
amount of earnings for the period had been distributed. This allocation of net income does not
impact our total net income, consolidated results of operations or total cash distributions;
however, it may result in our general partner being allocated additional incentive distributions
for purposes of our earnings per unit calculation, which could reduce net income per common and
subordinated unit. However, as defined in our partnership agreement, we determine cash
distributions based on available cash and determine the actual incentive distributions allocable to
our general partner based on actual distributions. When computing earnings per common and
subordinated unit, the amount of the assumed incentive distribution rights is deducted from net
income and allocated to our general partner for the period to which the calculation relates. The
remaining amount of net income, after deducting the assumed incentive distribution rights, is
allocated between the general partner, common and subordinated units based on how our partnership
agreement allocates net income.
8
Table of Contents
The potentially dilutive securities issued by us include phantom units, which do not require an
adjustment to the amount of net income used for dilutive earnings (loss) per common unit purposes.
The table below indicates the potential common units that were included in computing the dilutive
potential common units used in diluted earnings (loss) per common unit (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted average common units outstanding used in basic earnings (loss) per common unit |
27,363 | 17,546 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common units issuable: |
||||||||
Phantom units |
** | 5 | ||||||
Weighted average common units and dilutive potential common units used in diluted earnings
(loss) per common unit |
27,363 | 17,551 | ||||||
** | Excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per common unit as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
The table below indicates the potential number of common units that were excluded from net dilutive
potential units of common units as their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net dilutive potential common units issuable: |
||||||||
Phantom units |
61 | 67 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common units issuable |
61 | 67 | ||||||
2. AUGUST 2010 CONTRACT OPERATIONS ACQUISITION
In August 2010, we acquired from Exterran Holdings contract operations customer service agreements
with 43 customers and a fleet of approximately 580 compressor units used to provide compression
services under those agreements having a net book value of $121.8 million, net of accumulated
depreciation of $53.6 million, and comprising approximately 255,000 horsepower, or 6% (by then
available horsepower) of the combined U.S. contract operations business of Exterran Holdings and us
(the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition) for approximately $214.0 million, excluding
transaction costs. In connection with this acquisition, we issued approximately 8.2 million common
units to Exterran Holdings and approximately 167,000 general partner units to Exterran Holdings
wholly-owned subsidiaries.
In connection with this acquisition, we were allocated $5.9 million finite life intangible assets
associated with customer relationships of Exterran Holdings North America contract operations
segment. The amounts allocated were based on the ratio of fair value of the net assets transferred
to us to the total fair value of Exterran Holdings North America contract operations segment.
These intangible assets are being amortized through 2024, based on the present value of expected
income to be realized from these intangible assets.
An acquisition of a business from an entity under common control is generally accounted for under
GAAP by the acquirer with retroactive application as if the acquisition date was the beginning of
the earliest period included in the financial statements. Retroactive effect to the August 2010
Contract Operations Acquisition was impracticable because such retroactive application would have
required significant assumptions in a prior period that cannot be substantiated. Accordingly, our
financial statements include the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, revenues and direct
operating expenses associated with the acquisition beginning on the date of such acquisition.
However, the preparation of pro forma financial information allows for certain assumptions that do
not meet the standards of financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.
9
Table of Contents
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
Pro forma financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 has been included to give
effect to the expansion of our compressor fleet and service contracts as a result of the August
2010 Contract Operations Acquisition. The August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition is presented
in the pro forma financial information as though the transaction occurred as of January 1, 2010.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 reflects
the following transactions:
| our acquisition in August 2010 of certain contract operations customer service agreements and compression equipment from Exterran Holdings; and |
| our issuance in connection with the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition of approximately 8.2 million common units and approximately 167,000 general partner units to Exterran Holdings wholly-owned subsidiaries. |
The unaudited pro forma financial information below is presented for informational purposes only
and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the
transaction been consummated at the beginning of the period presented, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future results. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information below was
derived by adjusting our historical financial statements.
The following table presents unaudited pro forma financial information for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except per unit amounts):
Three Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||
Revenue |
$ | 65,857 | ||
Net income |
$ | 4,885 | ||
Basic earnings per common and subordinated limited partner unit |
$ | 0.14 | ||
Diluted earnings per common and subordinated limited partner unit |
$ | 0.14 | ||
Pro forma net income per limited partner unit is determined by dividing the pro forma net income
that would have been allocated to the common and subordinated unitholders by the weighted average
number of common and subordinated units expected to be outstanding after the completion of the
transactions included in the pro forma consolidated financial statements. All units issued in
connection with the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition were assumed to have been
outstanding since the beginning of the period presented. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, to
the extent that the quarterly distributions exceed certain targets, our general partner is entitled
to receive certain incentive distributions that will result in more net income proportionately
being allocated to our general partner than to the holders of our common and subordinated units.
The pro forma net earnings per limited partner unit calculations reflect pro forma incentive
distributions to our general partner, including an additional pro forma reduction of net income
allocable to our limited partners of approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, which includes the amount of additional incentive distributions that would have occurred
during the period.
3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We are a party to an omnibus agreement with Exterran Holdings and others (as amended and restated,
the Omnibus Agreement), the terms of which include, among other things:
| certain agreements not to compete between Exterran Holdings and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our affiliates, on the other hand; |
| Exterran Holdings obligation to provide all operational staff, corporate staff and support services reasonably necessary to operate our business and our obligation to reimburse Exterran Holdings for the provision of such services, subject to certain limitations and the cost caps discussed below; |
| the terms under which we, Exterran Holdings, and our respective affiliates may transfer compression equipment among one another to meet our respective contract operations services obligations; |
10
Table of Contents
| the terms under which we may purchase newly-fabricated contract operations equipment from Exterran Holdings affiliates; |
| Exterran Holdings grant of a license of certain intellectual property to us, including our logo; and |
| Exterran Holdings obligation to indemnify us for certain liabilities and our obligation to indemnify Exterran Holdings for certain liabilities. |
The Omnibus Agreement will terminate upon a change of control of our general partner or the removal
or withdrawal of our general partner, and certain provisions of the Omnibus Agreement will
terminate upon a change of control of Exterran Holdings.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, pursuant to the terms of the Omnibus Agreement, we
transferred ownership of 26 compressor units, totaling approximately 4,800 horsepower with a net
book value of approximately $2.1 million, to Exterran Holdings. In exchange, Exterran Holdings
transferred ownership of 28 compressor units, totaling approximately 5,200 horsepower with a net
book value of approximately $2.7 million, to us. During the three months ended March 31, 2010,
pursuant to the terms of the Omnibus Agreement, we transferred ownership of 31 compressor units,
totaling approximately 21,200 horsepower with a net book value of approximately $9.3 million, to
Exterran Holdings. In exchange, Exterran Holdings transferred ownership of 78 compressor units,
totaling approximately 16,500 horsepower with a net book value of approximately $10.9 million, to
us. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded capital contributions of
approximately $0.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related to the differences in net book
value on the compression equipment that was exchanged with us. No customer contracts were included
in the transfers. Under the terms of the Omnibus Agreement, such transfers must be of equal
appraised value, as defined in the Omnibus Agreement, with any difference being settled in cash. As
a result, Exterran Holdings paid to us a nominal amount for the difference in fair value of the
equipment in connection with the transfers.
Under the Omnibus Agreement, Exterran Holdings has agreed that, for a period that will terminate on
December 31, 2011, our obligation to reimburse Exterran Holdings for (i) any cost of sales that it
incurs in the operation of our business will be capped (after taking into account any such costs we
incur and pay directly); and (ii) any cash selling, general and administrative (SG&A) costs
allocated to us will be capped (after taking into account any such costs we incur and pay
directly). Cost of sales was capped at $21.75 per operating horsepower per quarter from July 30,
2008 through March 31, 2011. SG&A costs were capped at $6.0 million per quarter from July 30, 2008
through November 9, 2009, and at $7.6 million per quarter from November 10, 2009 through March 31,
2011. These caps may be subject to future adjustment or termination in connection with expansions
of our operations through the acquisition or construction of new assets or businesses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our cost of sales exceeded the cap provided in
the Omnibus Agreement by $6.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, our SG&A expenses exceeded the cap provided in the Omnibus Agreement by $2.3
million. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our SG&A expenses did not exceed the cap
provided in the Omnibus Agreement. The excess amounts over the caps are included in the
consolidated statements of operations as cost of sales or SG&A expense. The cash received for the
amounts over the caps has been accounted for as a capital contribution in our consolidated balance
sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows.
Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, we are permitted to purchase newly fabricated compression
equipment from Exterran Holdings or its affiliates at Exterran Holdings cost to fabricate such
equipment plus a fixed margin of 10%, which may be modified with the approval of Exterran Holdings
and the conflicts committee of Exterran GP LLCs board of directors. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not purchase any new compression equipment from Exterran Holdings.
Under GAAP, transfers of assets and liabilities between entities under common control are to be
initially recorded on the books of the receiving entity at the carrying value of the transferor.
Any difference between consideration given and the carrying value of the assets or liabilities is
treated as a capital distribution or contribution. Transactions between us and Exterran Holdings
and its affiliates are transactions between entities under common control. During each of the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Exterran Holdings contributed to us $0.4 million,
respectively, primarily related to the completion of overhauls on compression equipment that was
exchanged with us or contributed to us and where overhauls were in progress on the date of exchange
or contribution.
Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement, in the event that Exterran Holdings determines in good faith
that there exists a need on the part of Exterran Holdings contract operations services business or
on our part to lease compression equipment between Exterran Holdings
11
Table of Contents
and us to fulfill the
compression services obligations of either Exterran Holdings or us, such equipment may be leased if
it will not cause us to breach any existing compression services contracts or to suffer a loss of
revenue under an existing compression services contract or to incur any unreimbursed costs. At March 31, 2011, we had equipment on lease to
Exterran Holdings with an aggregate cost and accumulated depreciation of $15.0 million and $2.5
million, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we had revenues of $0.2 million and $0.3
million, respectively, from Exterran Holdings related to the lease of our compression equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we had cost of sales of $3.9 million and $3.1
million, respectively, with Exterran Holdings related to the lease of Exterran Holdings
compression equipment.
4. DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility due November 2015 |
$ | 300,000 | $ | 299,000 | ||||
Term loan facility due November 2015 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 450,000 | $ | 449,000 | ||||
On November 3, 2010, we entered into an amendment and restatement of our senior secured credit
agreement (as so amended and restated, the Credit Agreement) to provide for a new five-year,
$550.0 million senior secured credit facility consisting of a $400.0 million revolving credit
facility and a $150.0 million term loan facility. In March 2011, the revolving borrowing capacity
under this facility was increased by $150.0 million to $550.0 million.
As of March 31, 2011, we had undrawn capacity of $250.0 million under our revolving credit
facility. Our Credit Agreement limits our Total Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) to not greater than 4.75 to 1.0. The Credit Agreement allows for our Total Debt to
EBITDA ratio to be increased from 4.75 to 1.0 to 5.25 to 1.0 during a quarter when an acquisition
meeting certain thresholds is completed and for the following two quarters after such an
acquisition closes. Therefore, because the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition closed in
the third quarter of 2010, the maximum allowed ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA was 5.25 to 1.0
through March 31, 2011, reverting to 4.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 and
subsequent quarters. Due to this limitation, $200.9 million of the $250.0 million of
undrawn capacity under our revolving credit facility was available for additional borrowings as of
March 31, 2011. If the maximum allowed ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA had been 4.75 to 1.0 at March
31, 2011, then $138.9 million of the $250.0 million of undrawn capacity under our revolving credit
facility would have been available for additional borrowings as of March 31, 2011.
5. CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
We will make distributions of available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) from
operating surplus for any quarter during any subordination period in the following manner:
| first, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; |
| second, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior quarters during the subordination period; |
| third, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; |
| fourth, 98% to all common and subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, until each unit has received a distribution of $0.4025; |
12
Table of Contents
| fifth, 85% to all common and subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general partner, until each unit has received a distribution of $0.4375; |
| sixth, 75% to all common and subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general partner, until each unit has received a total of $0.525; and |
| thereafter, 50% to all common and subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to our general partner. |
The following table summarizes our distributions per unit for 2010:
Distribution per | ||||||||
Limited Partner | ||||||||
Period Covering | Payment Date | Unit | Total Distribution (1) | |||||
1/1/2010 3/31/2010
|
May 11, 2010 | $ | 0.4625 | $ 11.6 million | ||||
4/1/2010 6/30/2010
|
August 10, 2010 | 0.4625 | 11.6 million | |||||
7/1/2010 9/30/2010
|
November 9, 2010 | 0.4675 | 15.7 million | |||||
10/1/2010 12/31/2010
|
February 14, 2011 | 0.4725 | 16.0 million |
(1) | Including distributions to our general partner on its incentive distribution rights. |
On April 29, 2011, Exterran GP LLCs board of directors approved a cash distribution of $0.4775 per
limited partner unit, or approximately $16.2 million, including distributions to our general
partner on its incentive distribution rights. The distribution covers the time period from January
1, 2011 through March 31, 2011. The record date for this distribution is May 10, 2011 and payment
is expected to occur on May 13, 2011.
6. UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION
Long-Term Incentive Plan
We have a long-term incentive plan that was adopted by Exterran GP LLC, the general partner of our
general partner, in October 2006 for employees, directors and consultants of us, Exterran Holdings
or our respective affiliates. The long-term incentive plan currently permits the grant of awards
covering an aggregate of 1,035,378 common units, common unit options, restricted units and phantom
units. The long-term incentive plan is administered by the board of directors of Exterran GP LLC or
a committee thereof (the Plan Administrator).
Unit options have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the units on the
date of grant and become exercisable over a period determined by the Plan Administrator. Phantom
units are notional units that entitle the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the
phantom unit or, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, cash equal to the fair value of a
common unit.
Phantom Units
Exterran GP LLCs practice is to grant equity-based awards (i) to its officers once a year, in late
February or early March around the time the compensation committee of the board of directors of
Exterran Holdings grants equity-based awards to Exterran Holdings officers, and (ii) to its
directors once a year in October or November, around the anniversary of our initial public
offering. The schedule for making equity-based awards is typically established several months in
advance and is not set based on knowledge of material nonpublic information or in response to our
unit price. This practice results in awards being granted on a regular, predictable annual cycle.
Equity-based awards are occasionally granted at other times during the year, such as upon the
hiring of a new employee or following the promotion of an employee. In some instances, Exterran GP
LLCs board of directors may be aware, at the time grants are made, of matters or potential
developments that are not ripe for public disclosure at that time but that may result in public
announcement of material information at a later date.
13
Table of Contents
The following table presents phantom unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Phantom | Fair Value | |||||||
Units | per Unit | |||||||
Phantom units outstanding, December 31, 2010 |
98,537 | $ | 19.23 | |||||
Granted |
20,851 | 28.50 | ||||||
Vested |
(43,764 | ) | 18.90 | |||||
Phantom units outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
75,624 | $ | 21.98 | |||||
As of March 31, 2011, $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested phantom
units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
Unit Options
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no unit options outstanding.
7. ACCOUNTING FOR INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS
We are exposed to market risks primarily associated with changes in interest rates. We use
derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and costs associated with financial
activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our debt
obligations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
At March 31, 2011, we were party to interest rate swaps pursuant to which we pay fixed payments and
receive floating payments on a notional value of $250.0 million. We entered into these swaps to
offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in the associated variable interest
rates. Our interest rate swaps expire in November 2015. As of March 31, 2011, the weighted average
effective fixed interest rate on our interest rate swaps was 1.8%. We have designated these
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedging instruments so that any change in their fair values is
recognized as a component of comprehensive income and is included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss to the extent the hedge is effective. The swap terms substantially coincide with
the hedged item and are expected to offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in
the variable rate, and, therefore, we currently do not expect a significant amount of
ineffectiveness on these hedges. We perform quarterly calculations to determine whether the swap
agreements are still effective and to calculate any ineffectiveness. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no ineffectiveness related to interest rate swaps. We estimate
that $3.3 million of deferred pre-tax losses from existing interest rate swaps will be realized as
an expense during the next twelve months. Cash flows from derivatives designated as hedges are
classified in our consolidated statements of cash flows under the same category as the cash flows
from the underlying assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.
In November 2010, we paid $14.8 million to terminate interest rate swap agreements with a total
notional value of $285.0 million and a weighted average effective fixed interest rate of 4.4%.
These swaps qualified for hedge accounting and were previously included on our balance sheet as a
liability and in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The liability was paid in connection with
the termination, and the associated amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be
amortized into interest expense over the original term of the swaps. We estimate that $8.0 million
of deferred pre-tax losses from these terminated interest rate swaps will be amortized into
interest expense during the next twelve months.
14
Table of Contents
The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on our consolidated financial
position and results of operations (in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Asset | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | (Liability) | |||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
Interest rate swaps | $ | 7,304 | |||||
Interest rate hedges |
Current portion of interest rate swaps | (3,284 | ) | |||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 4,020 | ||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Asset | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | (Liability) | |||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
Interest rate swaps | $ | 5,769 | |||||
Interest rate hedges |
Current portion of interest rate swaps | (3,112 | ) | |||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 2,657 | ||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Location of Gain | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Reclassified from | ||||||||||
Recognized in Other | from Accumulated | Accumulated Other | ||||||||||
Comprehensive | Other Comprehensive | Comprehensive | ||||||||||
Income (Loss) on | Income (Loss) into | Income (Loss) into | ||||||||||
Derivatives | Income (Loss) | Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
$ | 589 | Interest expense | $ | (3,348 | ) | ||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Location of Gain | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Reclassified from | ||||||||||
Recognized in Other | from Accumulated | Accumulated Other | ||||||||||
Comprehensive | Other Comprehensive | Comprehensive | ||||||||||
Income (Loss) on | Income (Loss) into | Income (Loss) into | ||||||||||
Derivatives | Income (Loss) | Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
$ | (3,079 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (2,905 | ) | |||||
The counterparties to our derivative agreements are major international financial institutions. We
monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and do not expect non-performance by any
counterparty, although such non-performance could have a material adverse effect on us. We have no
specific collateral posted for our derivative instruments. The counterparties to our interest rate
swaps are also lenders under our credit facility and, in that capacity, share proportionally in the
collateral pledged under the credit facility.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) accounting standard for fair value measurements
and disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value into the following three broad categories.
| Level 1 Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement. |
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers. |
15
Table of Contents
| Level 3 Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information. |
The following table summarizes the valuation of our interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2011 with
pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in thousands):
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Market | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps asset (liability)
|
$ | 4,020 | $ | | $ | 4,020 | $ | |
The following table summarizes the valuation of our interest rate swaps and impaired long-lived
assets as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 with pricing levels as of the date of
valuation (in thousands):
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Market | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps asset (liability) |
$ | (15,809 | ) | $ | | $ | (15,809 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Impaired long-lived assets |
21 | | | 21 |
Our interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value utilizing a combination of the market and income
approach to fair value. We use discounted cash flows and market based methods to compare similar
interest rate swaps. Our estimate of the fair value of the impaired long-lived assets was based on
the estimated component value of the equipment that we plan to use.
9. UNIT TRANSACTIONS
In March 2011, Exterran Holdings sold, pursuant to a public underwritten offering, 5,914,466 common
units representing limited partner interests in us, including 664,466 common units sold pursuant to
an over-allotment option. We did not sell any common units in this offering and did not receive any
proceeds from the sale of the common units by Exterran Holdings. In connection with our initial
issuance of these units to Exterran Holdings, we agreed to pay certain costs relating to their
future public sale. These costs have been recorded as a reduction to partners capital.
As of March 31, 2011, Exterran Holdings owned 7,751,641 common units, 4,743,750 subordinated units
and 653,318 general partner units, collectively representing a 40% interest in us.
10. RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma
Information for Business Combinations. This standard update clarifies that, when presenting
comparative financial statements, public companies should disclose revenue and earnings of the
combined entity as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning
of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The update also expands the supplemental pro
forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro
forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro
forma revenue and earnings. The update is effective prospectively for business combinations entered
into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Our adoption of this new guidance did
not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
16
Table of Contents
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions.
In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows; however, because of the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot
provide assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows for the period in which that resolution occurs.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this report are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), including, without limitation, statements regarding our
business growth strategy and projected costs; future financial position; the sufficiency of
available cash flows to fund continuing operations; the sufficiency of available cash flows to make
cash distributions; the expected amount of our capital expenditures; future revenue, gross margin
and other financial or operational measures related to our business; the future value of our
equipment; plans and objectives of our management for our future operations; and any potential
contribution of additional assets from Exterran Holdings, Inc. (individually, and together with its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Exterran Holdings) to us. You can identify many of these statements by
looking for words such as believe, expect, intend, project, anticipate, estimate, will
continue or similar words or the negative thereof.
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct.
These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and those set forth from time to time in
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are available through our
website at www.exterran.com and through the SECs Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval
System at www.sec.gov. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements include, among other
things:
| conditions in the oil and natural gas industry, including a sustained decrease in the level of supply or demand for oil or natural gas and the impact on the price of oil or natural gas, which could cause a decline in the demand for our natural gas compression services; | ||
| reduced profit margins or the loss of market share resulting from competition or the introduction of competing technologies by other companies; | ||
| our dependence on Exterran Holdings to provide services and compression equipment, including its ability to hire, train and retain key employees and to timely and cost effectively obtain compression equipment and components necessary to conduct our business; | ||
| our dependence on and the availability of cost caps from Exterran Holdings to generate sufficient cash to enable us to make cash distributions at our current distribution rate; | ||
| changes in economic or political conditions, including terrorism and legislative changes; | ||
| the inherent risks associated with our operations, such as equipment defects, impairments, malfunctions and natural disasters; | ||
| an Internal Revenue Service challenge to our valuation methodologies, which may result in a shift of income, gains, losses and/or deductions between our general partner and our unitholders; | ||
| loss of our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes; | ||
| the risk that counterparties will not perform their obligations under our financial instruments; | ||
| the financial condition of our customers; | ||
| our ability to implement certain business and financial objectives, such as: |
| growing our asset base and asset utilization, particularly for our fleet of compressors; | ||
| integrating acquired businesses; |
18
Table of Contents
| generating sufficient cash; | ||
| accessing the capital markets at an acceptable cost; and | ||
| purchasing additional contract operations contracts and equipment from Exterran Holdings; |
| liability related to the provision of our services; | ||
| changes in governmental safety, health, environmental or other regulations, which could require us to make significant expenditures; and | ||
| our level of indebtedness and ability to fund our business. |
All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on
the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained throughout this report.
GENERAL
We are a publicly held Delaware limited partnership formed in 2006 to acquire certain contract
operations customer service agreements and a compressor fleet used to provide compression services
under those agreements. We completed our initial public offering in October 2006.
August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition
In August 2010, we acquired from Exterran Holdings contract operations customer service agreements
with 43 customers and a fleet of approximately 580 compressor units used to provide compression
services under those agreements, comprising approximately 255,000 horsepower, or approximately 6%
(by available horsepower) of the combined U.S. contract operations business of Exterran Holdings
and us (the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition), for approximately $214.0 million,
excluding transaction costs. In connection with this acquisition, we issued to Exterran Holdings
wholly-owned subsidiaries approximately 8.2 million common units and approximately 167,000 general
partner units.
Omnibus Agreement
We are a party to an omnibus agreement with Exterran Holdings, our general partner, and others (as
amended and restated, the Omnibus Agreement), the terms of which include, among other things:
| certain agreements not to compete between Exterran Holdings and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us and our affiliates, on the other hand; | ||
| Exterran Holdings obligation to provide all operational staff, corporate staff and support services reasonably necessary to operate our business and our obligation to reimburse Exterran Holdings for the provision of such services, subject to certain limitations and the cost caps discussed below; | ||
| the terms under which we, Exterran Holdings and our respective affiliates may transfer compression equipment among one another to meet our respective contract operations services obligations; and | ||
| the terms under which we may purchase newly-fabricated contract operations equipment from Exterran Holdings affiliates. |
For further discussion of the Omnibus Agreement, please see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I, Item 1 (Financial Statements) of this report.
19
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW
Industry Conditions and Trends
Our business environment and corresponding operating results are affected by the level of energy
industry spending for the exploration, development and production of natural gas reserves in the
U.S. Spending by natural gas exploration and production companies is dependent upon these
companies forecasts regarding the expected future supply, demand and pricing of, oil and natural
gas products as well as their estimates of risk-adjusted costs to find, develop and produce
reserves. Although we believe our business is typically less impacted by commodity prices than
certain other oil and natural gas service providers, changes in natural gas exploration and
production spending will normally result in changes in demand for our services.
Natural gas consumption in the U.S. for the twelve months ended January 31, 2011 increased by
approximately 5% over the twelve months ended January 31, 2010, is expected to increase by 1.0% in
2011 and is expected to increase by an average of 0.3% per year thereafter until 2035 according to
the Energy Information Administration (EIA). In 2009, the U.S. accounted for an estimated annual
production of approximately 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. The EIA expects total U.S.
marketed natural gas production to increase by 0.8% in 2011. The EIA estimates that the natural gas
production level in the U.S. will be approximately 23 trillion cubic feet in calendar year 2035.
Natural gas marketed production in the U.S. for the twelve months ended January 31, 2011 increased
by approximately 5% compared to the twelve months ended January 31, 2010.
Our Performance Trends and Outlook
Our results of operations depend upon the level of activity in the U.S. energy market. Oil and
natural gas prices and the level of drilling and exploration activity can be volatile. For example,
oil and natural gas exploration and development activity and the number of well completions
typically decline when there is a significant reduction in oil and natural gas prices or
significant instability in energy markets.
Our revenue, earnings, financial position and capital spending are affected by, among other things,
(i) market conditions that impact demand and pricing for natural gas compression, (ii) our
customers decisions to utilize our services rather than utilize products or services from our
competitors, and (iii) the timing and consummation of acquisitions of additional contract
operations customer contracts and equipment from Exterran Holdings. In particular, many of our
contracts with customers have short initial terms; we cannot be certain that these contracts will
be renewed after the end of the initial contractual term, and any such nonrenewal, or renewal at a
reduced rate, could adversely impact our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
As we believe there will be increased activity in certain U.S. natural gas plays, we anticipate
investing more capital in 2011 for new fleet units than we have in the recent past.
In the second half of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, we saw an increase in drilling activity
and an increase in our compression order activity. We believe the activity levels around the
natural gas industry in the U.S. will continue to increase in 2011, particularly in shale plays and
areas focused on the production of oil and natural gas liquids. However, we believe that due to (i)
the continued uncertainty around natural gas supply and demand and natural gas prices and (ii) the
current available supply of idle and underutilized compression equipment in the industry, as well
as new investment of capital in equipment, combined with (iii) the modest growth in demand in the
U.S., we may not be able to significantly improve our horsepower utilization and pricing and
therefore revenues in the near term (excluding the impact of potential transfers of additional
contract operations customer contracts and equipment from Exterran Holdings to us). Our contract
operations services business has historically experienced more stable demand than that of certain
other energy service products and services. A 1% decrease in average utilization of our contract
operations fleet would result in a decrease in our revenue and gross margin (defined as revenue
less cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense) for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 of approximately $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Pursuant to the Omnibus Agreement between us and Exterran Holdings, our obligation to reimburse
Exterran Holdings for cost of sales and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses is
capped through December 31, 2011 (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements). During the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our cost of sales exceeded this cap by $6.9 million and $2.8
million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our SG&A expenses exceeded the
cap provided in the Omnibus Agreement by $2.3 million. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, SG&A expenses did not exceed the cap provided in the Omnibus Agreement.
20
Table of Contents
Exterran Holdings intends for us to be the primary long-term growth vehicle for its U.S. contract
operations business and intends to offer us the opportunity to purchase the remainder of its U.S.
contract operations business over time, but is not obligated to do so. Likewise, we are not
required to purchase any additional portions of such business. The consummation of any future
purchase of additional portions of Exterran Holdings U.S. contract operations business and the
timing of any such purchase will depend upon, among other things, our reaching an agreement with
Exterran Holdings regarding the terms of such purchase, which will require the approval of the
conflicts committee of our board of directors. The timing of such transactions would also depend
on, among other things, market and economic conditions and our access to debt and equity capital.
Future contributions of assets to us upon consummation of transactions with Exterran Holdings may
increase or decrease our operating performance, financial position and liquidity. Unless otherwise
indicated, this discussion of performance trends and outlook excludes any future potential
transfers of additional contract operations customer contracts and equipment from Exterran Holdings
to us.
Operating Highlights
The following table summarizes total available horsepower, total operating horsepower, average
operating horsepower and horsepower utilization percentages (in thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
Total Available Horsepower (at period end)(1) |
1,590 | 1,572 | 1,318 | |||||||||
Total Operating Horsepower (at period end)(1) |
1,384 | 1,384 | 1,060 | |||||||||
Average Operating Horsepower |
1,387 | 1,364 | 1,060 | |||||||||
Horsepower Utilization: |
||||||||||||
Spot (at period end) |
87 | % | 88 | % | 80 | % | ||||||
Average |
88 | % | 82 | % | 81 | % |
(1) | Includes compressor units with an aggregate horsepower of 304 thousand, 278 thousand and 183 thousand leased from Exterran Holdings as of March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Excludes compressor units with an aggregate horsepower of 27 thousand, 18 thousand and 17 thousand leased to Exterran Holdings as of March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. |
Summary of Results
Net income. We recorded net income of $0.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in net income during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily caused by an
increase in our field operating expenses, partially offset by the benefit of the inclusion of the
results from the assets acquired in the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition.
EBITDA, as further adjusted. Our EBITDA, as further adjusted, was $31.2 million and $22.4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in EBITDA, as
further adjusted, during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was primarily caused by the inclusion of the results from the August 2010 Contract
Operations Acquisition, partially offset by an increase in our field operating expenses. For a
reconciliation of EBITDA, as further adjusted, to net income, its most directly comparable
financial measure, calculated and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. (GAAP), please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
21
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010
The following table summarizes our revenue, gross margin, gross margin percentage, expenses and net
income (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 68,729 | $ | 52,710 | ||||
Gross margin(1) |
31,677 | 26,859 | ||||||
Gross margin percentage |
46 | % | 51 | % | ||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 14,149 | $ | 11,878 | ||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
10,216 | 7,695 | ||||||
Interest expense |
7,075 | 5,692 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(221 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
235 | 173 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
(1) | For a reconciliation of gross margin to net income, its most directly comparable financial measure, calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Revenue. Average monthly operating horsepower was approximately 1,387,000 and 1,060,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in revenue and average
monthly operating horsepower was primarily due to the inclusion of the results from the assets
acquired in the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition.
Gross Margin. The increase in gross margin (defined as revenue less cost of sales, excluding
depreciation and amortization expense) during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily due to the inclusion of results from the assets
acquired in the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition. The decrease in gross margin
percentage was primarily caused by an increase in our field operating expenses, the primary driver
of which were costs to make idle units ready to be placed back into operation.
Depreciation and Amortization. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily
due to the additional depreciation on compression equipment additions, including the assets
acquired in the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition.
Long-lived Asset Impairment. We recorded approximately $0.2 million of long-lived asset impairment
on idle compression units during the three months ended March 31, 2010. This impairment was
recorded on compression units that had been previously removed from our available fleet and were to
be disposed of.
SG&A. SG&A expenses are primarily comprised of an allocation of expenses, including costs for
personnel support and related expenditures, from Exterran Holdings. The increase in SG&A expense
was primarily due to increased costs associated with the impact of the August 2010 Contract
Operations Acquisition. SG&A expenses represented 15% of revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010.
Interest Expense. The increase in interest expense was primarily due an increase in our average
effective interest rate, including the impact of interest rate swaps, to 6.3% for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 from 5.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and a higher average
balance of long-term debt for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010. Our average effective interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011
includes the impact of $2.6 million of interest expense related to the amortization of terminated
interest rate swaps. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of our interest
rate swap agreements.
22
Table of Contents
Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other (income) expense, net for each of the three month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 included a $0.2 million gain on the sale of used compression equipment.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense primarily reflects taxes recorded under the Texas margins
tax and the Michigan business tax. The increase in income tax expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily due to an increase
in our revenue earned within the state of Texas.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following tables summarize our sources and uses of cash for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, and our cash and working capital as of the end of the periods presented (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 15,887 | $ | 15,773 | ||||
Investing activities |
(8,787 | ) | (3,595 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(7,135 | ) | (12,245 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (35 | ) | $ | (67 | ) | ||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15 | $ | 50 | ||||
Working capital |
19,583 | 14,751 |
Operating Activities. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due
to higher business levels after the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition in the three months
ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, partially offset by an
increase in working capital in the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Investing Activities. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable
to an increase in capital expenditures and an increase in amounts due from affiliates for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. Capital expenditures
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $6.9 million, consisting of $1.4 million for fleet
growth capital and $5.5 million for compressor maintenance activities.
Financing Activities. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was the result of an
increase in net borrowings under our debt facilities and an increase in capital contributions,
partially offset by an increase in distributions to unitholders during the three months ended March
31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Capital Requirements. The natural gas compression business is capital intensive, requiring
significant investment to maintain and upgrade existing operations. Our capital spending is
dependent on the demand for our services and the availability of the type of compression equipment
required for us to render those services to our customers. Our capital requirements have consisted
primarily of, and we anticipate that our capital requirements will continue to consist of, the
following:
| maintenance capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and related cash flows further extending the useful lives of the assets; and | ||
| expansion capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to expand or to replace partially or fully depreciated assets or to expand the operating capacity or revenue generating capabilities of existing or new assets, whether through construction, acquisition or modification. |
Without giving effect to any equipment we may acquire pursuant to any future acquisitions, we
currently plan to spend approximately $22.0 million to $26.0 million on equipment maintenance
capital during 2011. Exterran Holdings manages its and our respective U.S. fleets as one pool of
compression equipment from which we can each readily fulfill our respective customers service
needs. When we or Exterran Holdings are advised of a contract operations services
opportunity, Exterran Holdings reviews both our and its fleet for an available and appropriate compressor unit.
Given that the substantial majority of the idle compression equipment has been and is currently
held by Exterran Holdings, much of the idle compression equipment required for these contract
operations services
23
Table of Contents
opportunities has been held by Exterran Holdings. Under the Omnibus Agreement,
the owner of the equipment being transferred is
required to pay the costs associated with making the idle equipment suitable for the proposed
customer and then has generally leased the equipment to the recipient of the equipment or exchanged
the equipment for other equipment of the recipient. Because Exterran Holdings has owned the
substantial majority of such equipment, Exterran Holdings has generally had to bear a larger
portion of the maintenance capital expenditures associated with making transferred equipment ready
for service. For equipment that is then leased, the maintenance capital cost is a component of the
lease rate that is paid under the lease. As we acquire more compression equipment, we expect that
more of our equipment will be available to satisfy our or Exterran Holdings customer requirements.
As a result, we expect that our maintenance capital expenditures will increase (and that lease
expense will be reduced).
In addition, our capital requirements include funding distributions to our unitholders. We
anticipate such distributions will be funded through cash provided by operating activities and
borrowings under our credit facility and that we have the ability to generate adequate amounts of
cash to meet our short-term needs and needs for the foreseeable future. Given our objective of long-term growth through
acquisitions, expansion capital expenditure projects and other internal growth projects, we
anticipate that over time we will continue to invest capital to grow and acquire assets. We expect
to actively consider a variety of assets for potential acquisitions and expansion projects. We
expect to fund future capital expenditures with borrowings under our credit facility, the issuance
of additional partnership units, and future debt offerings as appropriate, given market conditions.
The timing of future capital expenditures will be based on the economic environment, including the
availability of debt and equity capital.
Our Ability to Grow Depends on Our Ability to Access External Expansion Capital. We expect that we
will rely primarily upon external financing sources, including our senior secured credit facility
and the issuance of debt and equity securities, rather than cash reserves established by our
general partner, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures. Our ability to access
the capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which could
have an impact on our ability to grow.
We expect that we will distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders. Available cash is
reduced by cash reserves established by our general partner to provide for the proper conduct of
our business, including future capital expenditures. To the extent we are unable to finance growth
externally and we are unwilling to establish cash reserves to fund future acquisitions, our cash
distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to grow. Because we distribute all of our
available cash, we may not grow as quickly as businesses that reinvest their available cash to
expand ongoing operations. To the extent we issue additional units in connection with any
acquisitions or expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on those additional
units may increase the risk that we will be unable to maintain or increase our per unit
distribution level, which in turn may impact the available cash that we have to distribute for each
unit. There are no limitations in our partnership agreement or in the terms of our credit facility
on our ability to issue additional units, including units ranking senior to our common units.
Long-term Debt. On November 3, 2010, we entered into an amendment and restatement of our senior
secured credit agreement (as so amended and restated, the Credit Agreement) to provide for a new
five-year, $550.0 million senior secured credit facility consisting of a $400.0 million revolving
credit facility and a $150.0 million term loan facility. In March 2011, the revolving borrowing
capacity under this facility was increased by $150.0 million to $550.0 million.
As of March 31, 2011, we had undrawn capacity of $250.0 million under our revolving credit
facility. Our Credit Agreement limits our Total Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) to not greater than 4.75 to 1.0. The Credit Agreement allows for our Total Debt to
EBITDA ratio to be increased from 4.75 to 1.0 to 5.25 to 1.0 during a quarter when an acquisition
meeting certain thresholds is completed and for the following two quarters after such an
acquisition closes. Therefore, because the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition closed in
the third quarter of 2010, the maximum allowed ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA was 5.25 to 1.0
through March 31, 2011, reverting to 4.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 and
subsequent quarters. Due to this limitation, $200.9 million of the $250.0 million of
undrawn capacity under our revolving credit facility was available for additional borrowings as of
March 31, 2011. If the maximum allowed ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA had been 4.75 to 1.0 at March
31, 2011, then $138.9 million of the $250.0 million of undrawn capacity under our revolving credit
facility would have been available for additional borrowings as of March 31, 2011.
The revolving credit facility bears interest at a base rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus an
applicable margin. Depending on our leverage ratio, the applicable margin for revolving loans
varies (i) in the case of LIBOR loans, from 2.25% to 3.25% and (ii) in the case of base rate loans,
from 1.25% to 2.25%. The base rate is the highest of the prime rate announced by Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%. At
March 31, 2011, all amounts
24
Table of Contents
outstanding under the revolving credit facility were LIBOR loans and
the applicable margin was 2.5%. The weighted average annual interest rate on the outstanding
balance of our revolving credit facility at March 31, 2011, excluding the effect of interest rate
swaps, was 2.8%.
The term loan facility bears interest at a base rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus an applicable
margin. Depending on our leverage ratio, the applicable margin for term loans varies (i) in the
case of LIBOR loans, from 2.5% to 3.5% and (ii) in the case of base rate loans, from 1.5% to 2.5%.
At March 31, 2011, all amounts outstanding under the term loan facility were LIBOR loans and the
applicable margin was 2.75%. The average annual interest rate on the outstanding balance of the
term loan at March 31, 2011, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps, was 3.1%.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the U.S. personal
property assets of us and our Significant Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit
Agreement), including all of the membership interests of our Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in
the Credit Agreement).
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants with which we must comply, including restrictions
on the use of proceeds from borrowings and limitations on our ability to incur additional
indebtedness, engage in transactions with affiliates, merge or consolidate, sell assets, make
certain investments and acquisitions, make loans, grant liens, repurchase equity and pay dividends
and distributions. We must maintain various consolidated financial ratios, including a ratio of
EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to Total Interest Expense (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) of not less than 3.0 to 1.0 (which will decrease to 2.75 to 1.0 following the occurrence
of certain events specified in the Credit Agreement), a ratio of Total Senior Debt (as defined in
the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of Total Debt (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of not greater than 4.75 to 1.0. As discussed above, our
Total Debt to EBITDA ratio was temporarily increased from 4.75 to 1.0 to 5.25 to 1.0 at March 31,
2011 because the August 2010 Contract Operations Acquisition closed in the third quarter of 2010,
reverting to 4.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 and subsequent quarters. As of March
31, 2011, we maintained a 6.2 to 1.0 EBITDA to Total Interest Expense ratio and a 3.6 to 1.0 Total
Debt to EBITDA ratio. The Credit Agreement also contains various covenants requiring mandatory
prepayments from the net cash proceeds of certain asset transfers and debt issuances. If we
experience a material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, financial condition, business or
operations that, taken as a whole, impacts our ability to perform our obligations under the Credit
Agreement, this, among other things, could lead to a default under that agreement. As of March 31,
2011, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to a portion of our variable rate debt.
In November 2010, we paid $14.8 million to terminate interest rate swap agreements with a total
notional value of $285.0 million and a weighted average rate of 4.4%. These swaps qualified for
hedge accounting and were previously included on our balance sheet as a liability and in
accumulated other comprehensive loss. The liability was paid in connection with the termination,
and the associated amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be amortized into interest
expense over the original term of the swaps. Of the total amount included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss, $2.6 million was amortized into interest expense during the first quarter of
2011 and we expect $7.7 million to be amortized into interest expense during the remainder of 2011.
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of our interest rate swap agreements.
Distributions to Unitholders. Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
available cash quarterly. Under the partnership agreement, available cash is defined generally to
mean, for each fiscal quarter, (i) our cash on hand at the end of the quarter in excess of the
amount of reserves our general partner determines is necessary or appropriate to provide for the
conduct of our business, to comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements or to provide for future distributions to our unitholders for any one or more of the
upcoming four quarters, plus, (ii) if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of our
cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter.
On April 29, 2011, Exterran GP LLCs board of directors approved a cash distribution of $0.4775 per
limited partner unit, or approximately $16.2 million, including distributions to our general
partner on its incentive distribution rights. The distribution covers the time period from January
1, 2011 through March 31, 2011. The record date for this distribution is May 10, 2011 and payment
is expected to occur on May 13, 2011.
25
Table of Contents
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
We define gross margin as total revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense). Gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary measure
used by our management as it represents the results of revenue and cost of sales (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense), which are key components of our operations. We believe
gross margin is important because it focuses on the current performance of our operations and excludes
the impact of the prior historical costs of the assets acquired or constructed that are utilized in
those operations, the indirect costs associated with our SG&A activities, the impact of our
financing methods and income tax expense. Depreciation and amortization expense may not accurately
reflect the costs required to maintain and replenish the operational usage of our assets and
therefore may not portray the costs from current operating activity. As an indicator of our
operating performance, gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful
than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our gross margin may not be comparable to a
similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not calculate gross margin
in the same manner.
Gross margin has certain material limitations associated with its use as compared to net income.
These limitations are primarily due to the exclusion of interest expense, depreciation and
amortization expense and SG&A expense. Each of these excluded expenses is material to our
consolidated results of operations. Because we intend to finance a portion of our operations
through borrowings, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to
generate revenue. Additionally, because we use capital assets, depreciation expense is a necessary
element of our costs and our ability to generate revenue, and SG&A expenses are necessary costs to
support our operations and required corporate activities. To compensate for these limitations,
management uses this non-GAAP measure as a supplemental measure to other GAAP results to provide a
more complete understanding of our performance.
The following table reconciles our net income to our gross margin (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,149 | 11,878 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
10,216 | 7,695 | ||||||
Interest expense |
7,075 | 5,692 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(221 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
235 | 173 | ||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 31,677 | $ | 26,859 | ||||
We define EBITDA, as further adjusted, as net income plus income taxes, interest expense (including
debt extinguishment costs and gain or loss on termination of interest rate swaps), depreciation and
amortization expense, impairment charges, non-cash SG&A costs and any amounts by which cost of
sales, other charges, and SG&A costs are reduced as a result of caps on these costs contained in
the Omnibus Agreement, which amounts are treated as capital contributions from Exterran Holdings
for accounting purposes. We believe EBITDA, as further adjusted, is an important measure of
operating performance because it allows management, investors and others to evaluate and compare
our core operating results from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure
(interest expense from our outstanding debt), asset base (depreciation and amortization expense,
impairment charges), tax consequences, caps on operating and SG&A costs, non-cash SG&A costs and
reimbursements. Management uses EBITDA, as further adjusted, as a supplemental measure to review
current period operating performance, comparability measures and performance measures for period to
period comparisons. Our EBITDA, as further adjusted, may not be comparable to a similarly titled
measure of another company because other entities may not calculate EBITDA in the same manner.
EBITDA, as further adjusted, is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and should not
be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income, cash flows from operating activities
and other measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Items excluded from EBITDA, as further
adjusted, are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and,
therefore, EBITDA, as further adjusted, should only be used as a supplemental measure of our
operating performance.
26
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles our net income to EBITDA, as further adjusted (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
Income tax expense |
235 | 173 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,149 | 11,878 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Cap on operating and selling, general and administrative costs provided by Exterran Holdings |
9,129 | 2,794 | ||||||
Non-cash selling, general and administrative costs |
364 | 190 | ||||||
Interest expense |
7,075 | 5,692 | ||||||
EBITDA, as further adjusted |
$ | 31,175 | $ | 22,384 | ||||
We define distributable cash flow as net income plus depreciation and amortization expense,
impairment charges, non-cash SG&A costs, interest expense and any amounts by which cost of sales
and SG&A costs are reduced as a result of caps on these costs contained in the Omnibus Agreement,
which amounts are treated as capital contributions from Exterran Holdings for accounting purposes,
less cash interest expense (excluding amortization of deferred financing fees and costs incurred to
early terminate interest rate swaps) and maintenance capital expenditures, and excluding
gains/losses on asset sales and non-recurring items. We believe distributable cash flow is an
important measure of operating performance because it allows management, investors and others to
compare basic cash flows we generate (prior to the establishment of any retained cash reserves by
our general partner) to the cash distributions we expect to pay our unitholders. Using
distributable cash flow, management can quickly compute the coverage ratio of estimated cash flows
to planned cash distributions. Our distributable cash flow may not be comparable to a similarly
titled measure of another company because other entities may not calculate distributable cash flow
in the same manner.
Distributable cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and should not be
considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income, cash flows from operating activities
and other measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Items excluded from distributable cash flow
are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore,
distributable cash flow should only be used as a supplemental measure of our operating performance.
The following table reconciles our net income to distributable cash flow (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 223 | $ | 1,426 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,149 | 11,878 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 231 | ||||||
Cap on operating and selling, general and administrative costs provided by Exterran Holdings |
9,129 | 2,794 | ||||||
Non-cash selling, general and administrative costs |
364 | 190 | ||||||
Interest expense |
7,075 | 5,692 | ||||||
Less: Gain on sale of compression equipment |
(212 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||
Less: Cash interest expense |
(4,207 | ) | (5,420 | ) | ||||
Less: Maintenance capital expenditures |
(5,457 | ) | (2,147 | ) | ||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 21,064 | $ | 14,397 | ||||
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Variable Rate Debt
We are exposed to market risk due to variable interest rates under our financing arrangements.
27
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011, after taking into consideration interest rate swaps, we had approximately
$200.0 million of outstanding indebtedness that was effectively subject to floating interest rates.
A 1% increase in the effective interest rate on our outstanding debt subject to floating interest
rates at March 31, 2011 would result in an annual increase in our interest expense of approximately
$2.0 million.
For further information regarding our use of interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure
to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our debt obligations, see Note 7 to the Financial
Statements.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act), which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that we
are able to record, process, summarize and report the information required to be disclosed in our
reports under the Exchange Act within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on the evaluation, as of March 31, 2011, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be
disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to management, and made known to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
on a timely basis to ensure that it is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions.
While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, it believes that any
ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, because of the
inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any
particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operation or cash flows for the period in which the resolution
occurs.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors that were previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
29
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | |||
No. | Description | ||
2.1
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Corp., Exterran General Holdings LLC, Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009 | ||
2.2
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2010 | ||
3.1
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Universal Compression Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 27, 2006 | ||
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (now Exterran Partners, L.P.), dated as of August 20, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2007 | ||
3.3
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Exterran Partners, L.P., as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 | ||
3.4
|
Certificate of Partnership of UCO General Partner, LP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 27, 2006 | ||
3.5
|
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of UCO General Partner, LP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2006 | ||
3.6
|
Certificate of Formation of UCO GP, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 27, 2006 | ||
3.7
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of UCO GP, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2006 | ||
4.1
|
Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2009, by and between EXLP ABS 2009 LLC, as Issuer, EXLP ABS Leasing 2009 LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, with respect to the $150,000,000 ABS facility consisting of $150,000,000 of Series 2009-1 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2009 | ||
4.2
|
Series 2009-1 Supplement, dated as of October 13, 2009, to Indenture dated as of October 13, 2009, by and between EXLP ABS 2009 LLC, as Issuer, EXLP ABS Leasing 2009 LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, with respect to the $150,000,000 of Series 2009-1 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2009 | ||
31.1
|
* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
31.2
|
* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
32.1
|
** | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
** | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
May 5, 2011 | By: | EXTERRAN GENERAL PARTNER, L.P. its General Partner |
||
By: | EXTERRAN GP LLC its General Partner |
|||
By: | /s/ MICHAEL J. AARONSON | |||
Michael J. Aaronson | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ KENNETH R. BICKETT | |||
Kenneth R. Bickett | ||||
Vice President, Finance and Accounting (Principal Accounting Officer) |
31
Table of Contents
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit | |||
No. | Description | ||
2.1
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Corp., Exterran General Holdings LLC, Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009 | ||
2.2
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2010 | ||
3.1
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Universal Compression Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 27, 2006 | ||
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Universal Compression Partners, L.P. (now Exterran Partners, L.P.), dated as of August 20, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2007 | ||
3.3
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Exterran Partners, L.P., as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 | ||
3.4
|
Certificate of Partnership of UCO General Partner, LP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 27, 2006 | ||
3.5
|
Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of UCO General Partner, LP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2006 | ||
3.6
|
Certificate of Formation of UCO GP, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 27, 2006 | ||
3.7
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of UCO GP, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2006 | ||
4.1
|
Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2009, by and between EXLP ABS 2009 LLC, as Issuer, EXLP ABS Leasing 2009 LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, with respect to the $150,000,000 ABS facility consisting of $150,000,000 of Series 2009-1 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2009 | ||
4.2
|
Series 2009-1 Supplement, dated as of October 13, 2009, to Indenture dated as of October 13, 2009, by and between EXLP ABS 2009 LLC, as Issuer, EXLP ABS Leasing 2009 LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, with respect to the $150,000,000 of Series 2009-1 Notes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2009 | ||
31.1
|
* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
31.2
|
* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
32.1
|
** | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
** | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Exterran GP LLC (as general partner of the general partner of Exterran Partners, L.P.) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Filed herewith. | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
32