Exhibit 99.1

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended

December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity, and consolidated statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of White Mountains Re Group, Ltd. (the “Company”), at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010  in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board (United States) and in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York

April 29, 2011

1

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

See notes to the consolidated financial statements including Note 15 for Commitments and Contingencies.

2

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

3

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of  Shareholders’ Equity

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

4

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

5

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of White Mountains Re Group, Ltd. (“the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively with the Company, “White Mountains Re”) and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The Company is a subsidiary of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (“White Mountains” or the “Parent”). White Mountains’ shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol “WTM”. The Company is an exempted Bermuda limited liability company whose wholly-owned subsidiaries provide insurance and reinsurance on a worldwide basis.  White Mountains Re provides insurance and reinsurance products for property, accident and health, aviation and space, trade credit, marine, casualty, agriculture and certain other exposures on a worldwide basis through its subsidiaries, Sirius International Insurance Corporation (“WMRe Sirius”) and White Mountains Reinsurance Company of America (“WMRe America”, formerly known as Folksamerica Reinsurance Company). In addition, WMRe Sirius and WMRe America participate in a quota share reinsurance arrangement with Esurance Insurance Company (“Esurance”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of White Mountains (see Note 14). White Mountains Re also specializes in the acquisition and management of run-off insurance and reinsurance companies both in the United States and internationally through White Mountains Re Solutions, Ltd.  White Mountains Re also includes Scandinavian Reinsurance Company, Ltd. (“Scandinavian Re”), which is in run-off, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (“Central National”), which was acquired during the first quarter of 2010 and is in run-off (See Note 2), and the consolidated results of the Tuckerman Capital II, LP fund (“Tuckerman Fund II”) prior to January 1, 2010 (see Recently Adopted Changes in Accounting Principles).

In September 2009, White Mountains Re reorganized its reinsurance operations by transferring the in-force business of White Mountains Re Bermuda Ltd. (“WMRe Bermuda”) to WMRe Sirius, which in turn, established a branch office in Bermuda to maintain the group’s presence in the Bermuda market.

WMRe Sirius is a reinsurance company that is domiciled in Sweden with its home office in Stockholm, Sweden; and branch offices in London, United Kingdom; Zurich, Switzerland; Singapore; Liege, Belgium; Copenhagen, Denmark; Hamburg, Germany; and Bermuda.

WMRe America is a reinsurance company domiciled in the state of New York with offices in New York, New York; Danbury, Connecticut; Miami, Florida; and Toronto, Ontario.

White Mountains Re Solutions, Ltd., with offices in Glastonbury, Connecticut, was formed in 2000, and is comprised of financial, actuarial and claims professionals experienced in the management and resolution of complex insurance liabilities as well as the structuring of transactions designed to enable owners to exit an insurance business and extract trapped capital.

Scandinavian Re is a multi-line reinsurance company that was acquired in 2004 along with WMRe Sirius and has been in run-off since 2002.

Central National, which was acquired during the first quarter of 2010, is in run-off (See Note 2).

White Mountains Re purchased Tuckerman Fund II from White Mountains effective June 30, 2008. Tuckerman Fund II is consolidated in White Mountains Re’s financial results for all periods subsequent to its purchase through the year ended 2009. Effective January 1, 2010, White Mountains Re deconsolidated its investment in Tuckerman Fund II (See Note 12). See Recently Adopted Changes in Accounting Principles.

Galileo Weather Risks Advisors Limited, Galileo Weather Risk Management Ltd., and Galileo Weather Risk Management Advisors LLC (collectively, “Galileo”) were White Mountains Re’s weather risk management businesses. During the second quarter of 2009, White Mountains Re sold Galileo to its management for nominal consideration (See Note 2). The outstanding weather derivative contracts were retained by White Mountains Re

6

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

through two new subsidiaries:  Stratos Weather Risk Bermuda Ltd. and Stratos Weather Risks LLC (collectively, “Stratos”).  Effective December 2009, White Mountains Re entered into an agreement to novate the remaining outstanding weather derivative contracts to an unrelated third party.

Through October 2008, Commercial Casualty Insurance Company (“CCIC”) was a wholly-owned subsidiary of White Mountains Holding Company, Inc. (“WM Holdings”), the parent company of WMRe America. CCIC is a California domiciled insurance company that was acquired in 2004 and subsequently placed into voluntary run-off. During 2008, White Mountains Re sold its investment in CCIC as a part of the Berkshire Exchange (See Note 2).

As of December 31, 2010, White Mountains Re had two investments in unconsolidated affiliates. White Mountains Re holds investments in OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. (“OneBeacon”), a majority-owned subsidiary of White Mountains, which owns 76.0% of OneBeacon’s outstanding common shares at December 31, 2010. OneBeacon is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “OB.” White Mountains Re also holds investments in common shares and warrants to purchase common shares of Symetra Financial Corporation (“Symetra”). Symetra is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SYA.” In 2010, White Mountains Re sold its investment in Lightyear Delos Acquisition Corporation (“Delos”) (See Note 11).

All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Marketing and Distribution

Virtually all non-affiliated assumed reinsurance is obtained through reinsurance intermediaries. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, White Mountains Re received approximately 64%, 60% and 48% of its non-affiliated gross reinsurance written premiums from three major, third-party reinsurance intermediaries as follows:

(1)  AON Re acquired Benfield during 2008

During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, White Mountains Re received no more than 10% of its gross reinsurance premiums from any individual ceding company (excluding amounts assumed from subsidiaries of Esurance — See Note 14).

7

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Geographic Concentration

The following table shows White Mountains Re’s net written premiums by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008:

White Mountains Re conducts a significant portion of its business outside of the United States. As a result, a significant portion of White Mountains Re’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and are therefore subject to foreign currency risk. White Mountains Re’s foreign currency risk cannot be eliminated entirely and significant changes in foreign exchange rates may adversely affect White Mountains Re’s results of operations and financial condition. Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the risk that White Mountains Re will incur losses on a U.S. dollar basis due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Recently Adopted Changes in Accounting Principles

Accounting Standards Codification

On June 29, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“FAS 168”), which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification” or Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)) as the source of authoritative accounting principles to be applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. FAS 168 (ASC 105-10) is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards were superseded by the Codification. White Mountains Re adopted the Codification for the year ended December 31, 2009. Adoption did not have any effect on White Mountains Re’s accounting policies or financial statement presentation. However, because the Codification changes the basis for reference to authoritative GAAP guidance, White Mountains Re’s footnote disclosures that reference such guidance reflect references to the Codification. New accounting guidance is now issued by the FASB in the form of Accounting Standard Updates (“ASUs”). New guidance that became effective in 2009 prior to the adoption of Codification has been described below using the original FASB Statement reference with a parenthetical reference to the principal Codification section into which the Statement has been incorporated.

Transfers of Financial Assets and Amendments to FIN 46R

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (included in ASC 860) and ASU 2009-17, Amendments to FIN46(R)(included in ASC 810). Both ASU 2009-16 and ASU 2009-17 became effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that began after November 15, 2009. White Mountains Re adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2010.

ASU 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”). Under the new guidance, the appropriateness of de-recognition of assets held by an entity formerly considered QSPE is evaluated based on whether or not the transferor has surrendered control of the transferred assets. The evaluation must consider any continuing involvement by the transferor. White Mountains Re did not have any entities that were considered a QSPE under guidance prior to the amendments to ASC 860 and there was no effect resulting from adoption.

ASU 2009-17 amends ASC 810-10 to clarify the application of consolidation accounting for entities for which the controlling financial interest might not be solely indentified through voting rights.  Under the new guidance a

8

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

variable interest represents a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) when it has both of the following:  (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. A reporting entity must assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining if it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance. ASC 810-10 as amended requires ongoing reassessments of whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Upon adoption, White Mountains Re determined that its ownership interest in Tuckerman Fund II did not meet the criteria for consolidation under the revised guidance for variable interest entities and, accordingly, effective January 1, 2010, White Mountains Re deconsolidated its investment in Tuckerman Fund II. Upon deconsolidation, White Mountains Re made the fair value election for its investment in Tuckerman Fund II and recognized an adjustment to decrease opening retained earnings of $0.4 million.

Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements

White Mountains Re adopted ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (included in ASC 820-10), effective January 1, 2010. The ASU clarifies existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and requires the disclosure of (1) the amounts and nature of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements; (2) purchase, sale, issuance and settlement activity for Level 3 measurements presented on a gross rather than a net basis; (3) fair value measurements by Level presented on a more disaggregated basis, by asset or liability class; and (4) more detailed disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques for Level 2 and Level 3 measurements for interim and annual reporting periods. White Mountains Re has expanded its fair value disclosures to meet the requirements of the ASU effective for the year ended December 31, 2010 (see Note 5).

Alternative Investments

Effective December 31, 2009, White Mountains Re adopted ASU 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). Alternative investments include ownership interests in hedge funds and private equity funds, which White Mountains Re includes in other long-term investments. Under the ASU, the fair value of an alternative investment may be estimated based on net asset value per share (“NAV”) as reported by the investee, subject to certain requirements. The investee must calculate its NAV in accordance with the measurement principles of ASC Topic 946 (“US GAAP for Investment Companies”), meaning that the investee’s underlying investments have been measured at fair value. In addition, in circumstances where the investor intends to sell the investment for an amount that differs from the NAV, NAV may not be used to estimate fair value. The ASU also expands required disclosures, including the amount of unfunded commitments, a description of the terms and conditions upon which the investor may redeem investments, the circumstances in which an otherwise redeemable investment might not be redeemable (for instance, investment subject to a lockup period) as well as an estimate of when the restriction will lapse and, in circumstances where the investment cannot be redeemed but the investor receives distributions through the liquidation of the underlying assets, an estimate of the period of time over which the underlying assets are expected to be liquidated. Adoption did not have a material effect on White Mountains Re’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value

Effective December 31, 2009, White Mountains Re adopted ASU 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (included in ASC 820-10). The ASU provides additional guidance for circumstances where a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. The ASU permits use of the quoted price for an identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as an asset. The ASU also notes that valuation techniques consistent with the fair value principles of ASC 820-10 may be used, including a present value technique or market approach based on the amount that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into an identical liability at the measurement date.

White Mountains Re measures its variable annuity guarantee liabilities at fair value. There is no active market for these liabilities and, accordingly, White Mountains Re uses a valuation technique that incorporates actuarial and capital market assumptions related to the projected cash flows over the term of the contracts. Some of the assumptions are based on observable market data, such as those related to capital markets inputs, and some are based on inputs not readily observable, such as mortality, surrender and lapse rates. Where observable inputs are available, White Mountains Re uses the most current inputs available.

9

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material effect on White Mountains Re’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or measurement of the fair value of its variable annuity guarantee liability.

Subsequent Events

On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“FAS 165”). FAS 165 (included in ASC 855-10) defines the period after the balance sheet date during which a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which a reporting entity should recognize events or transaction occurring after the balance sheet date and the disclosures required for events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. Subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are to be recognized in the financial statements. Subsequent events that are conditions that arose after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements are not recognized in the financial statements, but should be disclosed if failure to do so would render the financial statements misleading. FAS165 requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. For subsequent events not recognized, disclosures should include a description of the nature of the event and either an estimate of its financial effect or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. White Mountains Re adopted FAS 165 effective June 30, 2009. Adoption did not affect the recognition or disclosure of subsequent events. White Mountains Re evaluates subsequent events up to the date of this report.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

On January 1, 2009, White Mountains Re adopted FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (included in ASC 320-10), which amends the guidance for other-than temporary impairments for debt securities classified as held-to-maturity (“HTM”) or available-for-sale (“AFS”). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 requires that, when evaluating whether an impairment of a debt security is other than temporary, the reporting entity is to assess whether it has the intent to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the security, a credit loss is deemed to exist and the security is considered to be other than temporarily impaired. The portion of the impairment loss related to a credit loss is to be recognized in earnings. The portion of the impairment loss related to factors other than credit loss is recognized as an unrealized loss.

White Mountains Re has made the fair value election for its investments in debt securities and, accordingly, all changes in the fair value of its debt securities are recognized in earnings regardless of whether such changes in fair value represent a temporary or other than temporary decline in value. As a result, adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 did not impact White Mountains Re’s method of accounting for its portfolio of investment securities.

Determining Fair Values in an Inactive Market and Distressed Transactions

On January 1, 2009, White Mountains Re adopted FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP 157-4”). FSP 157-4 (included in ASC 820-10-65) outlines factors to be considered by a reporting entity in determining whether a market for an asset or liability is active.  In circumstances where the reporting entity concludes that there has been a significant decrease in the volume of market activity for an asset or liability as compared to normal market activity, transactions or quoted prices may not reflect fair value. In such circumstances, FSP 157-4 requires analysis of the transactions or quoted prices and, where appropriate, adjustment to market inputs to estimate fair value. In addition, FSP 157-4 requires interim disclosures to include a description of the inputs and valuation techniques used to estimate fair value and a discussion of changes during the period. Adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have a material effect on the White Mountains Re’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flow statement.

Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests

On January 1, 2009, White Mountains Re adopted FAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 141 (“FAS 141R”) (included in ASC 805-10) and FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests-an amendment to ARB 51 (“FAS 160”) (included in ASC 810-10-65).

FAS 141R requires an acquiring company to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values at the acquisition date, with certain exceptions. This represents a basic change in

10

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

approach from the cost allocation method originally described in FAS 141, Business Combinations (“FAS 141”). In addition, FAS 141R changes the accounting for “step” acquisitions since it requires recognition of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, regardless of the acquirer’s percentage of ownership in the acquired company. This means that the acquirer will measure and recognize all of the assets, liabilities and goodwill, not just the acquirer’s share. Changes subsequent to the acquisition date in the amount of deferred tax valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties arising from a business combination are generally recognized in income.  Prior to adoption such changes were recognized through goodwill. FAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations effective January 1, 2009. There was no effect on White Mountains Re’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows upon adoption.

FAS 160 requires all companies to account for noncontrolling interests (formerly referred to as “minority interests”)  in subsidiaries as equity, clearly identified and presented separately from White Mountains Re’s equity. Once a controlling interest has been acquired, any subsequent acquisitions or dispositions of noncontrolling interests that do not result in a change of control are accounted for as equity transactions. Assets and liabilities acquired are measured at fair value only once, at the original acquisition date (i.e., the date at which the acquirer gained control). The recognition and measurement requirements of FAS 160 are applicable prospectively upon adoption; the presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied. Accordingly, upon adoption of FAS 160, White Mountains Re changed the presentation of its financial statements for prior periods to conform to the required presentation, as follows:  noncontrolling interests are now presented on the balance sheets within equity, separate from White Mountains Re’s common shareholders’ equity; the portion of net income, extraordinary items and comprehensive income attributable to White Mountains Re’s common shareholders and the noncontrolling interests are presented separately on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income; and the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity includes a reconciliation of the noncontrolling interests at the beginning and end of each reporting period.

Fair Value Measurements

On January 1, 2008, White Mountains Re adopted FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”) (included in ASC 820-10). FAS 157 provides a revised definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statement disclosure requirements for fair value information. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an exit price) at the measurement date. The Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external market data is limited or unavailable (“unobservable inputs”). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities have the highest priority (“Level 1”), followed by prices determined based on observable inputs including prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities (“Level 2”) and followed by prices based on assumptions that include significant unobservable inputs, having the lowest priority (“Level 3”).

White Mountains Re carries certain financial instruments at fair value with changes therein recognized in earnings. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value include substantially all of the investment portfolio and reinsurance assumed liabilities associated with variable annuity benefit guarantees. Valuation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value require management to make estimates and apply judgment to matters that may carry a significant degree of uncertainty. In determining its estimates of fair value, White Mountains Re uses a variety of valuation approaches and inputs. Whenever possible, White Mountains Re estimates fair value using valuation methods that maximize the use of observable prices and other inputs. Where appropriate, assets and liabilities measured at fair value have been adjusted for the effect of counterparty credit risk.

White Mountains Re’s invested assets measured at fair value include fixed maturity securities, convertible fixed maturity securities, common and preferred equity securities and other long-term investments, which include interests in hedge funds and private equity funds.

Where available, the estimated fair value of investments is based upon quoted prices in active markets. In circumstances where quoted prices are unavailable, White Mountains Re uses fair value estimates based upon other observable inputs including matrix pricing, benchmark interest rates, market comparables, and other relevant inputs. Where observable inputs are not available, the estimated fair value is based upon internal pricing models using

11

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

assumptions that include inputs that may not be observable in the marketplace but which reflect management’s best judgment given the circumstances and consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments.

White Mountains Re’s process to validate the market prices obtained from outside pricing sources include, but are not limited to, periodic evaluation of model pricing methodologies and monthly analytical reviews of certain prices. White Mountains Re also periodically performs back-testing of selected sales activity to determine whether there are any significant differences between the market price used to value the security prior to sale and the actual sale price.

Fair Value Option

On January 1, 2008, White Mountains Re adopted FAS 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“FAS 159”), (included in ASC 825-10), which allows companies to make an election on an individual instrument basis to report financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The election must be made at the inception of a transaction and may not be reversed. The election may also be made for existing financial assets and liabilities at the time of adoption. White Mountains Re made the fair value election for its portfolio of available for sale (“AFS”) securities which were reclassified to trading upon adoption, its investments in convertible fixed maturities, its investments in investment partnerships and for its assumed variable annuity Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits (“GMDB”) liabilities. Changes in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities for which the fair value election has been made are reported pre-tax in revenues.

Upon adoption, White Mountains Re recorded an adjustment to increase opening retained earnings and decrease accumulated other comprehensive income by $15.2 million to reclassify net unrealized gains and net unrealized foreign currency translation gains related to AFS securities and investments in limited partnerships and limited liability corporations.

White Mountains Re believes that making the election for its portfolio of investment securities and investments in hedge funds and private equity funds will result in reporting its investment results on a basis consistent with one of its operating principles, namely to manage investments for total return.

Significant Accounting Policies

Investment securities

At December 31, 2010, White Mountains Re’s invested assets were comprised of securities and other investments held for general investment purposes. White Mountains Re’s portfolio of fixed maturity investments and common equity securities held for general investment purposes were classified as AFS for the year ended December 31, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of FAS 159, the portfolio of fixed maturity investments and common equity securities held for general investment purposes were reclassified as trading.  See Recently Adopted Changes in Accounting Principles section of Note 1 for further discussion. AFS and trading securities are reported at fair value as of the balance sheet date.  Net unrealized investment gains and losses on AFS securities were reported net, after-tax, as a separate component of shareholders’ equity with changes therein, net of the effect of adjustments for noncontrolling interest and taxes, reported as a component of other comprehensive income. Changes in unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are reported, pre-tax, in revenues. Realized investment gains and losses on AFS and trading securities are accounted for using the specific identification method and are reported pre-tax in revenues. Premiums and discounts on all fixed maturity investments are accreted to income over the anticipated life of the investment.

White Mountains Re’s invested assets measured at fair value include fixed maturity securities, common and preferred equity securities, convertible fixed maturity securities and other long-term investments, such as interests in hedge funds and private equity funds. In determining its estimates of fair value, White Mountains Re uses a variety of valuation approaches and inputs. Whenever possible, White Mountains Re estimates fair value using valuation methods that maximize the use of quoted prices and other observable inputs.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately 95% and 93% of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon quoted market prices or other observable inputs. Investments valued using Level 1

12

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

inputs include fixed maturities, primarily investments in U.S. Treasuries, common equities and short-term investments, which include U.S. Treasury Bills. Investments valued using Level 2 inputs comprise fixed maturities including corporate debt, state and other governmental debt, convertible fixed maturity securities and mortgage and asset-backed securities. Fair value estimates for investments that trade infrequently and have few or no observable market prices are classified as Level 3 measurements. Level 3 fair value estimates based upon unobservable inputs include White Mountains Re’s investments in hedge funds and private equity funds, as well as investments in debt securities, including certain asset-backed securities, where quoted market prices are unavailable. White Mountains Re uses brokers and outside pricing services to assist in determining fair values. White Mountains Re’s process to validate the market prices obtained from the outside pricing sources includes, but is not limited to, periodic evaluation of model pricing methodologies and monthly analytical reviews of certain prices. White Mountains Re also periodically performs back-testing of selected sales activity to determine whether there are any significant differences between the market price used to value the security prior to sale and the actual sale price.

White Mountains Re’s investments in debt securities, including asset-backed securities, are generally valued using matrix and other pricing models. Key inputs include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, issuer spreads, bids, offers, credit ratings and prepayment speeds.  Income on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities is recognized using an effective yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When actual prepayments differ significantly from anticipated prepayments, the estimated economic life is recalculated and the remaining unamortized premium or discount is amortized prospectively over the remaining economic life.

Investment securities are regularly reviewed for impairment based on criteria that include the extent to which cost exceeds market value, the duration of the market decline, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer and the ability and intent to hold the investment to recovery. Investment losses that are other than temporary are recognized in earnings.

Short-term investments consist of money market funds, certificates of deposit and other securities which, at the time of purchase, mature or become available for use within one year.  Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximated fair value as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Other long-term investments

White Mountains Re’s other long-term investments are comprised primarily of hedge funds and private equity funds. Prior to January 1, 2008, changes in White Mountains Re’s interest in hedge funds and private equities accounted for using the equity method were included in net realized investment gains and losses and changes in White Mountains Re’s interest in hedge funds and private equities not accounted for under the equity method were reported, after-tax, as a component of shareholders’ equity, with changes therein reported as a component of other comprehensive income. Effective January 1, 2008, in connection with its adoption of FAS 159 (See Recently Adopted Changes in Accounting Principles section of Note 1 for further discussion) White Mountains Re made the fair value election for most of its investments in hedge funds and private equity interests. For the hedge fund and private equity investments for which White Mountains Re has made the fair value election, changes in fair value are reported in revenues as unrealized gains on a pre-tax basis. For those hedge fund and private equity investments for which White Mountains Re has not made the fair value election, White Mountains Re continues to account for its interests under the equity method.

13

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Securities lending

During 2009, White Mountains Re exited its securities lending program. White Mountains Re had participated in securities lending as a mechanism for generating additional investment income. Under the security lending arrangements, certain securities that White Mountains Re owned were loaned to other institutions for short periods of time through a lending agent. White Mountains Re retained the earnings and cash flows associated with the loaned securities and received a fee from the borrower for the temporary use of the asset. The security lending counterparty was required to provide collateral for the loaned securities, which was then invested by the lending agent. The collateral was required at a rate of 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities.  For White Mountains Re’s program, the collateral was fully controlled by the lending agent and could not be sold or re-pledged.  The fair value of the securities lending collateral was recorded as both an asset and as a liability; however, other than in the event of a default by the borrower, the collateral was not available to White Mountains Re and would have been remitted to the borrower by the lending agent upon return of the loaned securities. Because of these restrictions, White Mountains Re considered the securities lending activities to be non-cash transactions.

As of December 31, 2009, all loaned securities under the White Mountains Re program had been returned to White Mountains Re and all collateral held by White Mountains Re had been returned to borrowers.

Warrants

White Mountains Re holds warrants to acquire common shares of Symetra. White Mountains Re also holds warrants that it has received in the restructuring (e.g., securities received from bankruptcy proceedings) of certain of its common equity and/or fixed maturity investments. The Symetra warrants held by White Mountains Re are entitled to dividends declared to common shareholders. White Mountains Re accounts for its investments in warrants as derivatives.

White Mountains Re uses a Black Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of the Symetra warrants. The major assumptions used in valuing the Symetra warrants at December 31, 2010 were a risk-free rate of 1.29%, volatility of 25%, an expected life of 3.58 years, a strike price of $11.49 per share and a share price of $13.70 per share.

Interest rate lock

In anticipation of the issuance of the Company’s Senior Notes (the “WMRe Senior Notes”), White Mountains Re entered into an interest rate lock agreement to hedge its interest rate exposure from the date of the agreement until the pricing of the WMRe Senior Notes. The agreement was terminated on March 15, 2007 and the resulting loss of $2.4 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The loss is being reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense over the life of the WMRe Senior Notes using the interest method. See Note 6.

Derivatives—Variable annuity reinsurance

WMRe Sirius has entered into an agreement to reinsure death and living benefit guarantees associated with certain variable annuities in Japan. The accounting for benefit guarantees differs depending on whether or not the guarantee is classified as a derivative or an insurance liability.

Guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMABs”) are paid to an annuitant for any shortfall between accumulated account value at the end of the accumulation period and the annuitant’s total deposit, less any withdrawal payments made to the annuitant during the accumulation period. GMABs meet the definition of a derivative for accounting purposes. Therefore, GMABs are carried at fair value, with changes thereon recognized in income in the period of the change. The liability for the reinsured GMAB contracts has been determined using internal valuation models that use assumptions for interest rates, equity markets, foreign exchange rates and market volatilities at the valuation date, as well as annuitant-related actuarial assumptions, including surrender and mortality rates.

14

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

If an annuitant dies during the accumulation period of an annuity contract, GMDBs are paid to the annuitant’s beneficiary for shortfalls between accumulated account value at the time of an annuitant’s death and the annuitant’s total deposit, less any living benefit payments or withdrawal payments previously made to the annuitant. The life insurance liability for the reinsured GMDB contracts is calculated based on investment returns, mortality, surrender rates and other assumptions and is recognized over the contract period. Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of FAS 159, White Mountains Re elected to measure its GMDB liabilities at fair value.

The valuation of these liabilities involves significant judgment and is subject to change based upon changes in capital market assumptions and emerging surrender and mortality experience of the underlying contracts in force.

Concurrent with the agreement to reinsure death and living benefit guarantees associated with certain variable annuities in Japan, WMRe Sirius entered into an agreement with White Mountains Life Reinsurance (Bermuda) Ltd. (“WM Life Re”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of White Mountains, whereby 100% of the liability of White Mountains Re is retroceded to WM Life Re. As of December 31, 2010, annuity contracts mature within 5 years on average (with a maximum of 5½ years and a minimum of 4½ years remaining).

Under the terms of its reinsurance contracts, WMRe Sirius is required to maintain or cause an affiliate to maintain eligible assets (generally cash, short-term investments and derivative contracts such as options and futures) equal to the fair value of the liability, as defined in the reinsurance contract, for the benefit of the cedent. WM Life Re funded these eligible assets in 2010 and 2009.  Increases in the fair value of the liability in excess of the increase in value of the hedge assets, such as a decrease in surrender assumptions or underperformance of the hedging portfolio, must therefore be funded by White Mountains Re or an affiliate on a current basis. The actual amounts that must be paid to settle the contracts may not be known and generally will not become payable for a number of years.

WMRe Sirius had amounts due from WM Life Re in the amount of $610.2 million and $380.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009. White Mountains Re also has amounts due to the Japanese ceding company in regards to the variable annuities of $610.2 million and $380.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, White Mountains Re recorded fee income of $0.4 million for both periods from WM Life Re.

Cash

Cash includes amounts on hand and demand deposits with banks and other financial institutions. Amounts presented in the statement of cash flows are shown net of balances acquired and sold in the purchase or sale of White Mountains Re’s consolidated subsidiaries and exclude changes in amounts of restricted cash (See Note 10).

Insurance and reinsurance

White Mountains Re accounts for insurance policies and reinsurance contracts that it writes in accordance with ASC 944. Premiums written are recognized as revenues and are earned ratably over the term of the related policy or reinsurance treaty. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that are applicable to future insurance or reinsurance coverage provided by policies or treaties in force.

Deferred acquisition costs represent commissions and brokerage expenses which are directly attributable to and vary with the production of business. These costs are deferred and amortized over the applicable premium recognition period as insurance and reinsurance acquisition expenses. Deferred acquisition costs are limited to the amount expected to be recovered from future earned premiums and anticipated investment income. This limitation is referred to as a premium deficiency. A premium deficiency is recognized if the sum of expected loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”), expected dividends to policyholders, unamortized acquisition costs, and maintenance costs exceeds related unearned premiums and anticipated investment income. A premium deficiency is recognized by charging any unamortized acquisition costs to expense to the extent required in order to eliminate the deficiency. If the premium deficiency exceeds unamortized acquisition costs then a liability is accrued for the excess deficiency.

Losses and LAE are charged against income as incurred. Unpaid insurance losses and LAE are based on estimates (generally determined by claims adjusters, legal counsel and actuarial staff) of the ultimate costs of settling claims, including the effects of inflation and other societal and economic factors. Unpaid reinsurance losses and LAE are based primarily on reports received from ceding companies and actuarial projections. Unpaid loss and LAE

15

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

reserves represent management’s best estimate of ultimate losses and LAE, net of estimated salvage and subrogation recoveries, if applicable. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any adjustments resulting there from are reflected in current operations. The process of estimating loss and LAE involves a considerable degree of judgment by management and the ultimate amount of expense to be incurred could be considerably greater than or less than the amounts currently reflected in the financial statements.

In connection with purchase accounting for WMRe Sirius and Stockbridge Insurance Company (“Stockbridge”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of WMRe America until it was sold on November 1, 2007, after substantially all of its assets and liabilities were transferred to WMRe America through a Transfer and Assumption Agreement, White Mountains Re was required to adjust to fair value the loss and LAE reserves on WMRe Sirius’ acquired balance sheet by $58.1 million and on Stockbridge’s acquired balance sheet by $6.7 million. This fair value adjustment is being accreted through a statement of operations charge ratably with and over the period the claims are settled (See Note 3).

White Mountains Re enters into ceded reinsurance contracts from time to time to protect their businesses from losses due to concentration of risk, to manage their operating leverage ratios and to limit losses arising from catastrophic events. Such reinsurance contracts are executed through excess of loss treaties and catastrophe contracts under which the reinsurer indemnifies for a specified part or all of certain types of losses over stipulated amounts arising from any one occurrence or event. White Mountains Re has also entered into quota share treaties with reinsurers under which all risks meeting prescribed criteria are covered on a pro-rata basis. The amount of each risk ceded by White Mountains Re is subject to maximum limits which vary by line of business and type of coverage.

Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are estimated in a manner consistent with the claim liability associated with the reinsured policies. The collectability of reinsurance recoverables is subject to the solvency of the reinsurers. White Mountains Re is selective in regard to its reinsurers, principally placing reinsurance with those reinsurers with a strong financial condition, industry ratings and underwriting ability. Management monitors the financial condition and ratings of its reinsurers on an ongoing basis.

Reinsurance premiums, commissions, expense reimbursements and reserves related to reinsured business are accounted for on a basis consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Premiums ceded to other companies are reported as a reduction of premiums written. Expense allowances received in connection with reinsurance ceded have been accounted for as a reduction of the related policy acquisition costs and are deferred and amortized accordingly. Funds held by ceding companies represent amounts due to White Mountains Re in connection with certain assumed reinsurance agreements in which the ceding company retains a portion of the premium to provide security against future loss payments. The funds held by ceding companies are generally invested by the ceding company and a contractually agreed interest amount is credited to White Mountains Re and recognized as investment income. Funds held under reinsurance treaties represent contractual payments due to the reinsurer that White Mountains Re has retained to secure obligations of the reinsurer. Such amounts are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.

Accruals for contingent commission liabilities are established for reinsurance contracts that provide for the stated commission percentage to increase or decrease based on the loss experience of the contract. Changes in the estimated liability for such arrangements are recorded as contingent commissions. Accruals for contingent commission liabilities are determined through the review of the contracts that have these adjustable features and are estimated based on expected loss and LAE.

Federal and foreign income taxes

The Company is domiciled in Bermuda but has subsidiaries domiciled in several countries, and is therefore subject to file consolidated tax returns in the United States, Sweden, Luxembourg, Gibraltar, and Bermuda. Income earned or losses generated by companies outside the United States are generally subject to an overall effective tax rate lower than that imposed by the United States.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded when a difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts for tax purposes exists, and for other temporary differences. The deferred tax asset or liability is recorded based on tax rates expected to be in effect when the difference reverses. The deferred tax asset is recognized when it is more likely than not that it will be realized.

16

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Foreign currency exchange

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all of White Mountains Re’s businesses except for WMRe Sirius, and the Canadian reinsurance operations of WMRe America.  White Mountains Re also invests in securities denominated in foreign currencies. Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are converted using the average exchange rates for the period. Net foreign exchange gains and losses arising from translation are generally reported in shareholders’ equity, in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, White Mountains Re had an unrealized foreign currency translation gains of $61.7 million and $12.2 million recorded on its consolidated balance sheet.

Assets and liabilities relating to foreign operations are translated into the functional currency using current exchange rates; revenues and expenses are translated into the functional currency using the weighted average exchange rate for the period.  The resulting exchange gains and losses are reported as a component of net income in the period in which they arise.

The following rates of exchange for the U.S. dollar have been used for the most significant operations:

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests consist of the ownership interests of noncontrolling shareholders in consolidated subsidiaries, and are presented separately on the balance sheet. The portion of comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests is presented net of related income taxes in the statement of operations and comprehensive income

Preference shares

On May 24, 2007, the Company issued 250,000 non-cumulative perpetual preference shares with a $1,000 per share liquidation preference (the “WMRe Preference Shares”). Proceeds of $245.7 million, net of $4.3 million of issuance costs and commissions, were received from the issuance. These shares were issued in an offering that was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. Holders of the WMRe Preference Shares receive dividends on a non-cumulative basis when and if declared by the Company. The holders of the WMRe Preference Shares have the right to elect two directors to the Company’s board in the event of non-payment of dividends for six quarterly dividend periods. The right ceases upon the payment of dividends for four quarterly periods or the redemption of the WMRe Preference Shares. In addition, the Company may not declare or pay dividends on its common shares (other than stock dividends and dividends paid for purposes of any employee benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries) unless it is current on its most recent dividend period. The dividend rate is fixed at an annual rate of 7.506% until June 30, 2017. After June 30, 2017, the dividend rate will be paid at a floating annual rate, equal to the greater of 3 month LIBOR plus 3.20% or 7.506%. The WMRe Preference Shares are redeemable solely at the discretion of the Company on or after June 30, 2017 at their liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus any declared but unpaid dividends. Prior to June 30, 2017, the Company may elect to redeem the WMRe Preference Shares at an amount equal to the greater of 1) the aggregate liquidation preference of the shares to be redeemed and 2) the sum of the present values of the aggregate liquidation preference of the shares to be redeemed and the remaining scheduled dividend payments on the shares to be redeemed (excluding June 30, 2017), discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the rate on a comparable treasury issue, plus 45 basis points.

In the event of a liquidation of the Company, the holders of the WMRe Preference Shares would have preference over the common shareholders and would receive a distribution equal to the liquidation preference per share, subject to availability of funds.

17

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Policy Acquisition Costs

On October 13, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (ASC 944). The new standard changes the types of policy acquisition costs that are eligible for deferral. Specifically, the new guidance limits deferrable costs to those that are incremental direct costs of contract acquisition and certain costs related to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection costs and sales force contract selling. The ASU defines incremental direct costs as those costs that result directly from and were essential to the contract acquisition and would not have been incurred absent the acquisition. Accordingly, under the new guidance, deferrable acquisition costs are limited to costs related to successful contract acquisitions. Acquisition costs that are not eligible for deferral are to be charged to expense in the period incurred.

ASU 2010-26 is effective for interim periods and annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively.  White Mountains Re believes the adoption of ASU 2010-26 will not have a significant effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE 2. Significant Transactions

White Mountains Re has completed the following transactions:

·      On July 1, 2010, White Mountains exchanged 8,051,530 common shares of Symetra with a book value of $159.6 million to White Mountains Re for cash and investments equal to the fair value of the Symetra common shares of $100.0 million. As a result of this transaction, White Mountains Re recognized $21.1 million in additional paid-in capital and $28.1 million in unrealized gains through other comprehensive income (net of deferred taxes of $10.4 million).

·      On February 26, 2010, White Mountains Re acquired Central National for $5.0 million in cash. Central National ceased writing business in 1989 and has operated under the control of the Nebraska Department of Insurance since 1990. The transaction resulted in a gain of $12.8 million recorded in other revenues.

·      During 2009, White Mountains Re sold Galileo Weather Risk Management Advisors LLC, Galileo Weather Risk Management Ltd and Galileo Weather Risks Advisors Limited for nominal consideration. White Mountains Re retained the outstanding weather derivative contracts and stopped writing any new contracts. Effective December 2009, White Mountains Re entered into an agreement to novate the remaining outstanding weather derivative contracts to an unrelated third party. White Mountains Re was released from any liability related to the weather derivative contracts and all guaranties related to the weather business were terminated.

·      On August 15, 2008, White Mountains exchanged 5,524,862 shares of OneBeacon to White Mountains Re for $100.0 million in cash. As a result of this transaction, White Mountains Re recorded its investment in OneBeacon at its book value of $93.1 million, resulting in a $6.9 million return of capital to White Mountains (See Note 11).

·      At June 30, 2008, White Mountains Re purchased White Mountains’ investment in Tuckerman Fund II (See Note 12).

·      During the first quarter of 2008, White Mountains entered into an exchange agreement with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire”) to transfer certain run-off business and a substantial amount of cash to Berkshire in exchange for substantially all of the common shares of White Mountains owned by Berkshire (the “Berkshire Exchange”). As part of the Berkshire Exchange, on October 31, 2008, White Mountains Re sold its investment in CCIC to White Mountains for a $53.0 million promissory note.

18

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

·      On January 7, 2008, White Mountains Re acquired Helicon Re Holdings, Ltd. for $150.2 million, which resulted in the recognition of an extraordinary gain of $4.2 million.  Helicon Re Holdings, Ltd. is the parent of Helicon Reinsurance Company, Ltd. (“Helicon”), which in 2006 and 2007 provided quota share retrocessional coverage to White Mountains Re.  In the fourth quarter of 2008, Helicon Re Holdings, Ltd. and Helicon were both dissolved.

NOTE 3. Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

White Mountains Re establishes loss and LAE reserves that are estimates of amounts needed to pay claims and related expenses in the future for reinsured events that have already occurred. White Mountains Re also obtains reinsurance whereby another reinsurer contractually agrees to indemnify White Mountains Re for all or a portion of the reinsurance risks underwritten by White Mountains Re. Such arrangements, where one reinsurer provides reinsurance to another reinsurer, are usually referred to as “retrocessional reinsurance” arrangements. White Mountains Re establishes estimates of amounts recoverable from retrocessional reinsurance in a manner consistent with the loss and LAE liability associated with reinsurance contracts offered to its customers (the “ceding companies”), net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. Net reinsurance loss reserves represent loss and LAE reserves reduced by retrocessional reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses.

The estimation of net reinsurance loss and LAE reserves is subject to the same risk as the estimation of insurance loss and LAE reserves. In addition to those risk factors which give rise to inherent uncertainties in establishing insurance loss and LAE reserves, the inherent uncertainties of estimating such reserves are even greater for the reinsurer, due primarily to: (1) the claim-tail for reinsurers being further extended because claims are first reported to the original primary insurance company and then through one or more intermediaries or reinsurers, (2) the diversity of loss development patterns among different types of reinsurance treaties or facultative contracts, (3) the necessary reliance on the ceding companies for information regarding reported claims and (4) the differing reserving practices among ceding companies.

As with insurance reserves, the process of estimating reinsurance reserves involves a considerable degree of judgment by management and, as of any given date, is inherently uncertain. Based on the above, such uncertainty may be larger relative to the reserves for a company that principally writes reinsurance compared to an insurance company, and certainty may take a longer time to emerge.

Upon notification of a loss from an insured (typically a ceding company), White Mountains Re establishes case reserves, including LAE reserves, based upon White Mountains Re’s share of the amount of reserves established by the insured and White Mountains Re’s independent evaluation of the loss. In cases where available information indicates that reserves established by a ceding company are inadequate, White Mountains Re establishes case reserves or incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) in excess of its share of the reserves established by the ceding company. In addition, specific claim information reported by insureds or obtained through claim audits can alert management to emerging trends such as changing legal interpretations of coverage and liability, claims from unexpected sources or classes of business, and significant changes in the frequency or severity of individual claims where customary. Generally, ceding company audits are not customary outside the United States. This information is often used to supplement estimates of IBNR.

Although loss and LAE reserves are initially determined based on underwriting and pricing analyses, White Mountains Re regularly reviews the adequacy of its recorded reserves by using a variety of generally accepted actuarial methods, including historical incurred and paid loss development methods. If actual loss activity differs substantially from expectations, an adjustment to recorded reserves may be warranted. As time passes, loss reserve estimates for a given year will rely more on actual loss activity and historical patterns than on initial assumptions based on pricing indications.

The actuarial methods described above are used to calculate a point estimate of loss and LAE reserves for each company within White Mountains Re. These point estimates are then aggregated to produce an actuarial point estimate for the entire segment. Once a point estimate is established, White Mountains Re’s actuaries estimate loss reserve ranges to measure the sensitivity of the actuarial assumptions used to set the point estimates. These ranges are calculated from historical variations in loss ratios, payment and reporting patterns by class and type of business.

19

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Loss and loss adjustment expense reserve summary

The following table summarizes the loss and LAE reserve activities of White Mountains Re for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

Loss and LAE development —2010

During the year ended December 31, 2010, White Mountains Re experienced $72.4 million of net favorable loss reserve development, primarily related to short-tailed lines, such as property, accident and health and marine, in recent underwriting years. Included in the $72.4 million favorable loss reserve development was the recognition of $16.3 million in deferred gains from a retrocessional reinsurance contract that incepted in 2000 and was fully collected in 2010. Partially offsetting the favorable loss reserve development were $7.3 million of additional losses related to asbestos and environmental (“A&E”) exposures. In addition, there was $15.3 million of net favorable loss reserve development arising from the Esurance quota share arrangement.

Loss and LAE development — 2009

During the year ended December 31, 2009, White Mountains Re experienced $34.0 million of net favorable loss reserve development, due mainly to a $20.0 million cession under a retrocessional contract related to the 2001 accident year and favorable commutation activity on certain old casualty treaties, partially offset by $17.7 million of additional losses related to A&E exposures. These retroceded losses were substantially offset in pre-tax income by $10.0 million of ceded premiums and $7.2 million of interest charges on funds held under the contract. In addition, there was $3.6 million of net favorable loss reserve development arising from the Esurance quota share arrangement.

Loss and LAE development — 2008

During the year ended December 31, 2008, White Mountains Re experienced $84.2 million of net adverse loss reserve development, primarily resulting from a comprehensive loss reserve review performed in the second quarter of 2008, as described below, and $40.5 million of construction defect losses from accident years 2001 and prior recorded in the first quarter of 2008, offset by net favorable loss reserve development from recent accident years.

20

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

White Mountains Re management commenced a comprehensive loss reserve review (the “Reserve Review”) in the second quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of the $40.5 million adverse loss reserve development recorded in the first quarter of 2008 referred to above. The Reserve Review was conducted by management, including internal underwriting, claims and actuarial personnel, with assistance from external consultants. The Reserve Review included all of WMRe America’s non-asbestos and environmental (“A&E”) casualty loss reserves as well as certain lines of business at WMRe Sirius. The Reserve Review resulted in $140.0 million of additional adverse loss reserve development at WMRe America, partially offset by $85.0 million of favorable loss reserve development at WMRe Sirius during the second quarter of 2008. The adverse loss reserve development at WMRe America was predominantly attributable to its casualty reinsurance book written in the 1996-2002 underwriting years, whereas the favorable loss reserve development at WMRe Sirius was predominantly attributable to its property reinsurance book.  In addition, there was $4.3 million of net adverse loss reserve development arising from the Esurance quota share arrangement.

Fair value adjustment to loss and LAE reserves

In connection with purchase accounting for the acquisitions of Scandinavian Re and Stockbridge, White Mountains Re was required to adjust to fair value the loss and LAE reserves and the related reinsurance recoverables to fair value on their respective acquired balance sheets. The net reduction to loss and LAE reserves is being recognized through an income statement charge ratably with and over the period the claims are settled.

White Mountains Re recognized $8.5 million, $6.8 million and $4.9 million of such charges, recorded as loss and LAE during 2010, 2009 and 2008. As of December 31, 2010, the pre-tax un-accreted adjustment was $21.1 million.

The fair values of Scandinavian Re’s loss and LAE reserves and related reinsurance recoverables acquired on April 16, 2004, and Stockbridge’s loss and LAE reserves and related reinsurance recoverables acquired on December 22, 2006 were based on the present value of their expected cash flows with consideration for the uncertainty inherent in both the timing of, and the ultimate amount of, future payments for losses and receipts of amounts recoverable from reinsurers. In estimating fair value, management discounted the nominal loss reserves of Scandinavian Re and Stockbridge to their present value using an applicable risk-free discount rate. The series of future cash flows related to such loss payments and reinsurance recoveries were developed using Scandinavian Re’s and Stockbridge’s historical loss data. The resulting discount was reduced by the “price” for bearing the uncertainty inherent in Scandinavian Re’s and Stockbridge’s net loss reserves in order to estimate fair value. This was approximately 12% and 2% of the present value of the expected underlying cash flows of the loss reserves and reinsurance recoverables of Scandinavian Re and Stockbridge, respectively, which is believed to be reflective of the cost Scandinavian Re and Stockbridge would incur if they had attempted to reinsure the full amount of its net loss and LAE reserves with a third-party reinsurer.

Asbestos and environmental loss and loss adjustment expense reserve activity

White Mountains Re’s reserves include provisions made for claims that assert damages from asbestos and environmental related exposures. Asbestos claims relate primarily to injuries asserted by those who came in contact with asbestos or products containing asbestos. Environmental claims relate primarily to pollution and related clean-up cost obligations, particularly as mandated by U.S. federal and state environmental protection agencies. In addition to the factors described above regarding the reserving process, White Mountains Re estimates its A&E reserves based upon, among other factors, facts surrounding reported cases and exposures to claims, such as policy limits and deductibles, current law, past and projected claim activity and past settlement values for similar claims, as well as analysis of industry studies and events, such as recent settlements and asbestos-related bankruptcies. The cost of administering A&E claims, which is an important factor in estimating loss reserves, tends to be higher than in the case of non-A&E claims due to the higher legal costs typically associated with A&E claims.

In the third quarter 2010, WMRe America completed an in-depth analysis of its asbestos exposure, which was an update to the 2007 asbestos study described below. The main focus of the analysis was on the internal claims analysis of all treaty and facultative contracts likely to have asbestos exposure at June 30, 2010.  This analysis entailed examining total expected asbestos losses and LAE from a variety of information sources, including asbestos studies, data reported to WMRe America and external benchmarking scenarios.  The combined effect of all these

21

White Mountains Re Group, Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

estimates resulted in no further increase in IBNR for asbestos losses and LAE as a result of the 2010 in-depth analysis.

In 2007, White Mountains Re completed a detailed, ground-up asbestos exposure study. The study analyzed potential exposure to loss of all insureds that had reported at least $250,000 in losses to WMRe America through reinsurance contracts as of June 30, 2007 and a significant sample of all other insureds that had reported losses of less than $250,000, whose sample findings were extrapolated to the entire population. The combined effect of all these estimates resulted in an increase of $51.6 million in IBNR for asbestos losses and LAE in 2007.

In 2008, White Mountains Re recorded $11.0 million of IBNR losses and LAE, reflecting an increase in paid losses and LAE recorded during the year.  This amount was developed by analyzing the claim payment activity WMRe America experienced and comparing this activity to what was expected to emerge since the December 2007 asbestos study.  In 2009, White Mountains Re recorded $18.4 million of asbestos losses based on a similar claims payment review. In 2010, prior to the in-depth analysis described above, White Mountains Re recognized $7.3 million of additional asbestos losses, also based on a claims payment review.

White Mountains Re reviewed WMRe America’s exposure to environmental losses using industry benchmarks such as “survival ratios”, IBNR to case reserve ratios, and reported and paid environmental claim activity. Based on this information, management did not increase environmental reserves.  White Mountains Re’s A&E three year survival ratio was 12.5 years at December 31, 2010 and 12.3 years at December 31, 2009.

White Mountains Re’s reserves for A&E losses at December 31, 2010 represent management’s best estimate of its ultimate liability based on information currently available. However, as case law expands, and medical and clean-up costs increase and industry settlement practices change, White Mountains Re may be subject to asbestos and environmental losses beyond currently estimated amounts. White Mountains Re cannot reasonably estimate at the present time loss reserve additions arising from any such future adverse developments and cannot be sure that allocated loss reserves will be sufficient to cover additional liability arising from any such adverse developments.

The following table summarizes reported asbestos and environmental loss and LAE reserve activities (gross and net of reinsurance) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively: