Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - VIKING ENERGY GROUP, INC.v216591_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - VIKING ENERGY GROUP, INC.v216591_ex32-1.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2010

OR

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 000-29219

SINOCUBATE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nevada
99-0199508
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

65 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, New York 10006
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

(347) 329-2954
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x        No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes x        No ¨

As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $109,049. Shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director and each by each person who owns 10 percent or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the Registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of March 7, 2011 there were 995,655 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.
 
 
 

 
 

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements." These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of predictive, future-tense or forward-looking terminology like "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "estimates," "may," or similar terms. These statements appear in a number of places in this annual report and include statements regarding the Company’s intent, belief or current expectations and those of its directors or officers with respect to, among other things:(i) trends affecting its financial condition or results of operations, (ii) its business and growth strategies, and (iii) its financing plans. You are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Factors that could adversely affect actual results and performance include, among others, the Company’s need for additional capital, its history of losses, the intense competition the Company faces in its business, the fact that its stock is a “penny stock” and the other material risks described under “Risk Factors”. The accompanying information contained in this annual report, including, without limitation, the information set forth under the heading "Item 1.  Business" identifies important additional factors that could materially adversely affect actual results and performance. You are urged to carefully consider these factors. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statement.
 
 
 

 

SINOCUBATE, INC.
(the “Company”)

FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
 
   
Page
 
       
PART I
   
2
 
Item 1.
Business
   
3
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
   
7
 
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
   
7
 
Item 2.
Properties
   
7
 
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
   
7
 
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
   
7
 
         
PART II
   
8
 
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
   
8
 
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
   
8
 
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
   
8
 
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
   
11
 
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
   
F-1
 
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
   
12
 
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
   
12
 
         
PART III
   
12
 
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
   
12
 
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
   
15
 
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
   
16
 
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
   
17
 
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
   
18
 
         
PART IV
   
19
 
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
   
19
 
         
SIGNATURES
   
20
 
 
 
1

 

PART I

Item 1.
Business

Overview

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on May 3, 1989 as Sparta Ventures Corp. and remained inactive until June 27, 1998.  The name of the Company was changed to Thermal Ablation Technologies Corporation on October 8, 1998 and then to Poker.com, Inc. on August 10, 1999.  On September 15, 2003, the Company changed its name to LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. and on November 8, 2006, the name of the Company was changed to Synthenol Inc.  Effective November 3, 2008, the Company merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary, SinoCubate, Inc., which remained the surviving entity of the merger.  SinoCubate was formed in the State of Nevada on September 11, 2008.  The merger resulted in a change of name of the Company from Synthenol Inc. to SinoCubate, Inc. and a change in the state of incorporation of the Company from Florida to Nevada.  

Business

Since November 2008, the Company has sought to enter into contractual arrangements with entities that allow the Company to either purchase outright the assets and/or business operations of such entities or to enter into business arrangements, such as joint ventures or similar combinations with such entities to manage and operate such entities.  The Company is a development stage company as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board AccountingStandards Codification, or FASB ASC 915, “Development Stage Entities.”

On December 19, 2009, Viking Investments, LLC, an entity controlled and managed by Tom Simeo, the Company’s chairman, chief executive officer and president, announced a strategic partnership with Viking, whereby Viking, in exchange for a fee, and SinoCubate will work together and assist various business entities in the Peoples Republic of China  or the PRC in their endeavors to become publicly listed companies in the United States.  In connection with the strategic agreement, the Company was to newly issue 4,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares ofcommon stock ofRenhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Renhuang owned by Viking, and newly issue 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for entry into the strategic partnership agreement.  In connection with the foregoing transactions, Philip Wan and Yung Kong Chin were appointed directors and officers of the Company and were each granted warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.26 per share exercisable in whole or in part at any time during the 3 years after issuance.  Effective, March 26, 2010, the parties elected to terminate the strategic partnership agreement and the directors and officers appointed thereby, Messrs. Wan and Chin, resigned as directors and officers of the Company and agreed not to exercise their warrants to purchase the Company’s shares.  The Company has subsequently cancelled the warrants.  No shares were issued to Viking and neither the Company nor Viking has monetary or other demand on the other related to the cancellation.

As of the date of this Report, the Company has not entered into an agreement with any entity and there can be no assurance that the Company will ever be able to identify and enter into an agreement with an entity or whether, if the Company successful enters into an agreement with a suitable entity, such combination may become successful and/or profitable.
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There are several material risks associated with the Company. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, which all constitute material risks relating to the Company. If any of the following risks are realized, the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed. This means investors could lose all or a part of their investment.

 Conflicts of Interest

Certain conflicts of interest may exist between the Company and its sole officer and director and its principal shareholder, Viking.  The Company’s sole officer and director, Tom Simeo is also the principal officer of Viking and has other business interests to which he devotes his attention, and he may devote only limited time to the business of the Company. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through exercise of such judgment as is consistent with fiduciary duties to the Company. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

 
2

 
 
Need for Additional Financing

The Company currently has little or no funds and the lack of funds may negatively impact the Company’s ability to pursue it business strategy of seeking to acquire or enter into contractual arrangements with an entity to either acquire such entity or to enter into a contract arrangement that will enable the Company to manage such an entity. Even if the Company’s funds prove to be sufficient to acquire an interest in, or complete a transaction with, an entity, the Company may not have enough capital to exploit the opportunity. The ultimate success of the Company may depend upon its ability to raise additional capital. The Company may investigate the availability, source, or terms that might govern the acquisition of additional capital but will not do so until it determines a need for additional financing. If additional capital is needed, there is no assurance that funds will be available from any source or, if available, that they can be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company. If not available, the Company’s operations will be limited to those that can be financed with its modest capital.

Regulation of Penny Stocks

The Company’s securities may be subject to a SEC rule that imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers or accredited investors. For purposes of the rule, the phrase “accredited investors” means, in general terms, institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000, or individuals having a net worth, or joint net worth with spouse, in excess of $1,000,000 excluding the value of the person’s primary residence or having an annual income that exceeds $200,000 (or that, when combined with a spouse’s income, exceeds $300,000). For transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s securities and also may affect the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell their securities in any market that might develop.

In addition, the SEC has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks.” Such rules include Rules 3a51-1, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6, 15g-7, and 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Exchange Act. Because the securities of the Company may constitute “penny stocks” within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to the Company and to its securities. The rules may further affect the ability of owners of shares to sell the securities of the Company in any market that might develop for them.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) “boiler room” practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses.

Lack of Operating History

The majority interest in the Company was purchased in August 2008 for the purpose of seeking a business opportunity. Due to the special risks inherent in the investigation, acquisition, or involvement in a new business opportunity, the Company must be regarded as a new or start-up venture with all of the unforeseen costs, expenses, problems, and difficulties to which such ventures are subject.
 
No Assurance of Success or Profitability

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to acquire or consummate a favorable business opportunity. Even if the Company should become involved in a business opportunity, there is no assurance that it will generate revenues or profits, or that the market price of the Company’s common stock will be increased thereby.

 
3

 
 
Possible Business – Not Identified and Highly Risky

The Company has not identified and has no commitments to enter into or acquire a specific business opportunity and therefore can only disclose the risks and hazards of a business or opportunity that it may enter into in only a general manner, and cannot disclose the risks and hazards of any specific business or opportunity that it may enter into. An investor can expect a potential business opportunity to be quite risky. The Company’s acquisition of or participation in a business opportunity will likely be highly illiquid and could result in a total loss of investment to the Company and its stockholders if the business or opportunity proves to be unsuccessful. See Item 1 “Business.”

Type of Business Acquired

The type of business to be acquired may be one that desires to avoid effecting its own public offering and the accompanying expense, delays, uncertainties, and federal and state requirements which purport to protect investors. Because of the Company’s limited capital, it is more likely than not that any acquisition by the Company will involve other parties whose primary interest is the acquisition of control of a publicly traded company. Moreover, any business opportunity acquired may be currently unprofitable or present other negative factors.

Impracticality of Exhaustive Investigation

The Company has limited or no funds and, this, coupled with the lack of full-time management will likely make it impracticable to conduct a complete and exhaustive investigation and analysis of a business opportunity before the Company commits its capital or other resources to such venture. Decisions will therefore likely be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analysis, market surveys and the like which, if the Company had more funds available to it, would be desirable. The Company will be particularly dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoter, owner, sponsor, or others associated with the business opportunity seeking the Company’s participation. A significant portion of the Company’s available funds may be expended for investigative expenses and other expenses related to preliminary aspects of completing an acquisition transaction, whether or not any business opportunity investigated is eventually acquired.

Lack of Diversification

Because of the limited financial resources that the Company has, it is unlikely that the Company will be able to diversify its acquisitions or operations. The Company’s probable inability to diversify its activities into more than one area will subject the Company to economic fluctuations within a particular business or industry and therefore increase the risks associated with the Company’s operations.

Reliance upon Financial Statements

The Company generally will require audited financial statements from companies that it proposes to acquire or to which it seeks to enter into a contractual arrangement.  In cases where no audited financials are available, the Company will have to rely upon interim period unaudited information received from a target company’s management that has not been verified by outside auditors. The lack of the type of independent verification which audited financial statements would provide increases the risk that the Company, in evaluating an acquisition or contractual arrangement with such a target company, will not have the benefit of full and accurate information about the financial condition and recent interim operating history of the target company. This risk increases the prospect that the acquisition of or the contractual arrangement with such a company might prove to be an unfavorable one for the Company or the holders of the Company’s securities.
 
Moreover, the Company will be subject to the reporting provisions of the Exchange Act, and thus will be required to furnish certain information about significant acquisitions or contractual arrangements, including audited financial statements for any business that it acquires or with which it enters into a contractual arrangement for control. Consequently, prospects that do not have, or are unable to provide reasonable assurances that they will be able to obtain, the required audited statements would not be considered by the Company to be appropriate for an acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable. Should the Company, during the time it remains subject to the reporting provisions of the Exchange Act, complete an acquisition or enters into a contract for control of an entity for which audited financial statements prove to be unobtainable, the Company would be exposed to enforcement actions by the SEC and to corresponding administrative sanctions, including permanent injunctions against the Company and its management. The legal and other costs of defending an SEC enforcement action would have material, adverse consequences for the Company and its business. The imposition of administrative sanctions would subject the Company to further adverse consequences. In addition, the lack of audited financial statements would prevent the securities of the Company from becoming eligible for listing on NASDAQ, or on any existing stock exchange.

 
4

 
 
Moreover, the lack of such financial statements is likely to discourage broker-dealers from becoming or continuing to serve as market makers in the securities of the Company. Without audited financial statements, the Company would almost certainly be unable to offer securities under a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act, and the ability of the Company to raise capital would be significantly limited until such financial statements were to become available.

Other Regulation

An acquisition or a contractual arrangement for control of an entity made by the Company may be of a business that is subject to rules and regulation by federal, state, local or foreign authorities. Compliance with such rules and regulations can be expected to be a time-consuming, expensive process and may limit other opportunities of the Company.

Limited Participation of Management

The Company is heavily dependent upon the skills, talents, and abilities of its sole officer and director, Mr. Simeo, who currently serves on a very limited-time basis, to manage and implement its business plan.

Lack of Continuity in Management

The Company does not have any employment agreements with its sole officer, Mr. Simeo, and as a result, there is no assurance Mr. Simeo will continue to be associated with the Company in the future. In connection with acquisition of a business opportunity, it is likely that Mr. Simeo may resign as an officer and director of the Company subject to compliance with Section 14f of the Exchange Act.  A decision to resign will be based upon the identity of the business opportunity and the nature of the transaction, and is likely to occur without the vote or consent of the stockholders of the Company.

No Independent Audit Committee

The Company does not have an independent Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. The entire Board of Directors functions as the Company’s Audit Committee. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended or the SOX and rules and regulations adopted by the SEC to implement the SOX impose certain standards on listed companies relative to the maintenance and operations of Board of Directors Audit Committees, including but not limited to the requirement that Audit Committees be appointed, that membership of such committees comprise only independent directors, that a financial professional be among the membership of such committee and that such committee be afforded an adequate operating budget and be able to employ independent professional advisors. The SOX also requires that the Audit Committee oversee the work of a company’s outside auditors and that the outside auditors be responsible to the Audit Committee. At this time, the Company is not in compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as they relate to independent Board of Directors Audit Committees. The Company believes that under rules and regulations adopted by the SEC to implement these provisions of the SOX it is not required to comply with its requirements relating to the appointment of an Audit Committee of its Board of Directors and conforming with the enumerated standards and guidelines because the Company is not a “Listed Company” as defined therein. Notwithstanding, the Company may ultimately be determined not to be in compliance therewith and may therefore face penalties and restrictions on its operations until it comes into full compliance. Additionally, the Company’s failure to comply with the provisions of the SOX could preclude it from being listed on NASDAQ or any other stock exchanges until it can show that it is in compliance. The Company’s failure to be in compliance with the SOX could also present an impediment to a potential business combination where the target company intends that the Company apply for listing on NASDAQ or any other applicable stock exchanges.
 
 
5

 
 
Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Nevada statutes provide for the indemnification of the Company’s directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with or activities on behalf of the Company. The Company will also bear the expenses of such litigation for any of its directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person’s promise to repay the Company if it is ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by the Company which it may be unable to recoup.

Dependence upon Outside Advisors

To supplement the Company’s officers, directors and principal shareholders, the Company may be required to employ accountants, technical experts, appraisers, attorneys, or other consultants or advisors. The selection of any such advisors will be made by the Company without any input from stockholders. Furthermore, it is anticipated that such persons may be engaged on an “as needed” basis without a continuing fiduciary or other obligation to the Company. In the event the Company considers it necessary to hire outside advisors, such persons may be affiliates of the Company, if they are able to provide the required services.

Competition

The search for potentially profitable business opportunities of the type sought by the Company is intensely competitive. The Company expects to be at a disadvantage when competing with many firms that have substantially greater financial and management resources and capabilities than the Company. These competitive conditions will exist in any industry in which the Company may become interested.

No Foreseeable Dividends

The Company has not paid dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future.

Loss of Control by Present Management and Shareholders

The Company may consider an acquisition in which the Company would issue as consideration for the business opportunity to be acquired an amount of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock that would, upon issuance, represent the great majority of the voting power and equity of the Company. The result of such an acquisition would be that the acquired company’s stockholders and management would control the Company, and the Company’s Board of Directors and management could be replaced by persons unknown at this time. Such a merger would result in a greatly reduced percentage of ownership of the Company by its current shareholders.
 
Rule 144 Sales

The majority of the outstanding shares of common stock held by present stockholders are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. As restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Securities Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 in general requires restricted securities to be held for a particular length of time, and prescribes the conditions which must be satisfied prior to the sale of the securities.  Under new amendments to Rule 144, if an issuer of securities, such as the Company, has been subject to reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act for at least 90 days, then the restricted securities of such issuer are subject to a six-month holding period.  Under the amendments, a non-affiliate that has held restricted securities of a reporting issuer for more than six months but less than one year can resell the securities in reliance on Rule 144, if current information is available for the issuer.  After one year, the non-affiliate may freely resell the restricted securities without regard to any Rule 144 condition.  A non-affiliate of a non-reporting issuer must hold the securities for one year before any public resale.  After one year, a non-affiliate may freely resell such securities without regard to Rule 144 conditions.  Under the new amendments, Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by a shell company (reporting or non-reporting) or a former shell company unless certain conditions detailed under Rule 144 are met.  A sale under Rule 144 or under any exemption from the Securities Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the Company’s common stock.

 
6

 
 
Other Information

Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries engaged in any research and development activities during 2010.  The Company does not manufacture any products or engage in any activity that requires compliance with environmental laws.

Employees

The Company currently does not have any employees other than the Company’s sole officer, Mr. Simeo.

Reports to Securities Holders

The Company provides an annual report that includes its audited financial information to its shareholders upon written request.  The Company also makes its financial information equally available to any interested parties or investors through compliance with the disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. The Company is subject to disclosure filing requirements including filing a Form 10-K annually and Form 10-Q quarterly. In addition, the Company will file Form 8-K and other proxy and information statements from time to time as required.

The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.
Properties

The principal executive office of the Company is located at 65 Broadway, 7th floor, New York, New York 10006 where it shares an office space provided by its sole officer, Tom Simeo.  The Company does not pay rent for the use of the offices.


Item 3.
Legal Proceedings

As of December 31, 2010, the Company was not a party to any pending or threatened legal proceedings.


Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)

PART II

Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

There is no "established trading market" for shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s common stock was quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "SBAT.OB". No assurance can be given that any "established trading market" for the Company’s common stock will develop or be maintained.

 
7

 
 
The range of high and low closing bid quotations for the Company’s common stock during each quarter of the calendar years ended December 31 2010 and 2009, is shown below, as quoted by http://finance.yahoo.com .   Prices are inter-dealer quotations, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

Stock Quotations
 
Quarter Ended
 
High Bid
   
Low Bid
 
March 31, 2009
   
0.20
     
0.20
 
June 30, 2009
   
0.20
     
0.20
 
September 30, 2009
   
0.21
     
0.21
 
December 31, 2009
   
0.30
     
0.30
 
March 31, 2010
   
0.30
     
0.30
 
June 30, 2010
   
0.30
     
0.30
 
September 30, 2010
   
0.20
     
0.20
 
December 31, 2010
   
0.30
     
0.30
 

The future sale of the Company’s presently outstanding "unregistered" and "restricted" common stock by present members of management and persons who own more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities may have an adverse effect on any "established trading market" that may develop in the shares of the Company’s common stock.

Holders

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 34 shareholders of record of common stock, including shares held by brokerage clearing houses, depositories or otherwise in unregistered form.  The Company does not know the beneficial owners of such shares.

Item 6.
Selected Financial Data

The Company, as a smaller reporting company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), is not required to furnish information required by this item.
 
Item 7. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

In preparing the management’s discussion and analysis, the registrant presumes that you have read or have access to the discussion and analysis for the preceding fiscal year.
 
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended or the Reform Act.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earning, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions of performance; and statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.  Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: the Company’s ability to raise capital and the terms thereof; and other factors referenced in the Form 10-K.

 
8

 
 
The use in this Form 10-K of such words as “believes”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. These forward-looking statements present the Company’s estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report.  Except for the Company’s ongoing obligation to disclose material information as required by the federal securities laws, the Company does not intend, and undertakes no obligation, to update any forward-looking statements.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in any of the forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed or any of the Company’s forward-looking statements.  The Company’s future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company’s business plan is to seek, investigate, and, if warranted, enter into contractual arrangements with entities that enables the Company to either purchase outright the assets and and/or business operations of such entities or to enter into business arrangements, such as joint ventures or similar combinations with such entities to manage and operate such entities as affiliated entities of the Company.

As of the date of this Report, the Company has not entered into an agreement with any such entity and there can be no assurance that the Company will ever be able to identify and enter into an agreement with an entity or whether, if the Company successful enters into an agreement with an entity, such combination may become successful and/or profitable.

The Company is in immediate need of further working capital and options are being explored with respect to financing in the form of debt, equity or a combination thereof.

Investigation and Selection of Business Opportunities

To a large extent, a decision to participate in a specific contractual arrangement may be made upon the analysis of the quality of the other company’s management and personnel, the anticipated acceptability of new products or marketing concepts, the merit of technological changes, the perceived benefit the Company will derive from entering into such an arrangement, and numerous other factors which are difficult, if not impossible, to analyze through the application of any objective criteria. In many instances, it is anticipated that the historical operations of a specific business opportunity may not necessarily be indicative of the potential for the future because of the possible need to access capital, shift marketing approaches substantially, expand significantly, change product emphasis, change or substantially augment management, or make other changes. The Company will be dependent upon the owners of a business opportunity to identify any such problems which may exist and to implement, or be primarily responsible for the implementation of, required changes. Because the Company may participate in a business opportunity with a newly organized firm or with a firm which is entering a new phase of growth, it should be emphasized that the Company will incur further risks, because management in many instances will not have proved its abilities or effectiveness, the eventual market for such company’s products or services will likely not be established, and such company may not be profitable when acquired.
 
It is emphasized that the Company may effect transactions having a potentially adverse impact upon the Company’s shareholders pursuant to the authority and discretion of the Company’s management and board of directors without submitting any proposal to the stockholders for their consideration. Holders of the Company’s securities should not anticipate that the Company will necessarily furnish such holders, prior to any contractual arrangement or combination, with financial statements, or any other documentation, concerning a target company or its business. In some instances, however, a proposed arrangement may be submitted to the stockholders for their consideration, either voluntarily by such directors to seek the stockholders’ advice and consent or because federal and/or state law so requires.

 
9

 
 
The Company is unable to predict when it may participate in a business opportunity. Prior to making a decision to participate in a business opportunity, the Company will generally request that it be provided with written materials regarding the business opportunity containing such items as a description of products, services and company history; management resumes; financial information; available projections, with related assumptions upon which they are based; an explanation of proprietary products and services; evidence of existing patents, trademarks, or services marks, or rights thereto; present and proposed forms of compensation to management; a description of transactions between such company and its affiliates during relevant periods; a description of present and required facilities; an analysis of risks and competitive conditions; a financial plan of operation and estimated capital requirements; audited financial statements, or if they are not available, unaudited financial statements, together with reasonable assurances that audited financial statements would be able to be produced within a reasonable period of time following completion of a merger transaction; and other information deemed relevant.

As part of the Company’s investigation, the Company’s officers may meet personally with management and key personnel of the target entity may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company’s limited financial resources.

There are no loan arrangements or arrangements for any financing whatsoever relating to any business opportunities currently available.

Going Concern Qualification

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.  Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but considers that the Company will be able to obtain additional funds by equity financing and/or related party advances; however there is no assurance of additional funding being available.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2009

General Description

The Company’s business strategy is to seek to enter into contractual arrangements with entities that enables the Company to either purchase outright the assets and/or business operations of such entities or to enter into business arrangements, such as joint ventures or similar combinations with such entities to manage and operate such entities.

General and Administrative Operating Expenses

The total general and administrative operating expenses for the Company were $25,198 in fiscal 2010, compared to $52,024 in fiscal 2009.  The decrease was mainly due to lower consulting and professional fees.
 
Net Loss

The Company incurred a net loss of $25,198 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as compared with net loss of $52,024 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in net loss is attributable to the fact that the company did not accrue any management and consultant fees in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
 
 
10

 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no cash or working capital.  The Company is in immediate need of further working capital and it may consider options with respect to financing in the form of debt, equity or a combination thereof.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
The Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor in the Company’s securities.
 
Seasonality
 
Our operating results are not affected by seasonality.
 
Inflation
 
Our business and operating results are not affected in any material way by inflation.
 
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
The Company, as a smaller reporting company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), is not required to furnish information required by this item.
 
 
11

 
 
 
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accountants Firm
 
F-2
Balance Sheet
 
F-3
Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
 
F-4
Statement of Cash Flows (audited)
 
F-5
Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency (audited)
 
F-6 - F-7
Notes to Financial Statements
 
F-8 –F12
 
 
F-1

 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
SinoCubate, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of SinoCubate, Inc. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ deficiency for the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  We did not audit the financial statements of the Company from the date of inception to December 31, 2007, which statements reflect cumulative total assets of $66,273 and cumulative expenses of $1,057,305 for the period from inception to December 31, 2007.  Those statements were audited by another auditor whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the cumulative financial information from inception of the development stage on January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2007, is based solely on the report of the other auditor.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
The Company is not required to have nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditing firm, these financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended  December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from inception of the development stage on January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2010 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in note 1 to the financial statements, the Company is a development stage company and has no established source of revenues.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
 
 
“SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP”
   
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Chartered Accountants
April 13, 2011
Licensed Public Accountants
 
1167 Caledonia Road
Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1
Tel:  416 785 5353
Fax:  416 785 5663
 
 
F-2

 
 
SINOCUBATE INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
(Audited)
(Amounts expressed in US dollars)
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
ASSETS
           
Current
           
Cash
 
$
   
$
 
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
               
                 
Current
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
$
   
$
 
                 
Capital stock
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2009
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 995,655 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009: 995,655 common shares)
   
996
     
    996
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
2,359,863
     
2,334,665
 
Deficit
   
(1,305,454
)
   
(1,305,454)
 
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
   
(1,055,405
)
   
(1,030,207)
 
                 
   
$
   
$
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

 
F-3

 
  
SINOCUBATE INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Audited)
(Amounts expressed in US dollars)
 
   
Twelve months ended
   
January 1, 2004
(Date of
Inception
of the
Development
Stage) to
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
 
General and administrative expenses
                 
Amortization
 
$
   
$
   
$
27,077
 
Bad debt
   
     
     
525
 
Corporate promotion
   
     
     
13,920
 
Finance charges
           
     
27,397
 
Insurance
           
     
15,901
 
Interest on notes payable
           
     
34,648
 
Management and consultant fees
 
     
24,020
     
314,374
 
Office supplies and services
   
3,198
     
4,504
     
50,942
 
Professional fees
   
22,000
     
23,500
     
331,517
 
Rent
                   
16,311
 
Wages
   
    
     
    
     
84,258
 
                         
Loss before other items
   
(25,198
)
   
(52,024
)
   
(916,870
                         
Other items
                       
Loss on disposition of equipment
           
     
(15,028
Write-down of intangible assets
           
     
(50,001
Write-off of payables
           
     
73,607
 
Write-off of notes payable
           
     
14,823
 
Gain on settlement of lawsuit
           
     
44,445
 
Gain on sale of investment
           
     
31,874
 
Other income
           
     
42,530
 
                         
Loss from continuing operations
   
(25,198
)
   
(52,024)
     
(774,620
)
                         
Operating loss from discontinued operations
                   
(388,905
                         
Gain on sales of discontinued operations
           
     
108,120
 
                         
Net loss
 
$
(25,198
)
 
$
(52,024)
   
$
(1,055,405
                         
Basic and diluted loss per
                       
                         
 Common share – continuing operations
   
(0.03
)
   
 (0.05)
         
 – discontinued operations
   
     
 —
         
 – total 
   
(0.03
)
   
(0.05)
     
  
  
                         
Weighted average number of common share outstanding – basic and diluted
   
995,655
     
995,655
         
                         
Comprehensive loss
                       
Net loss
 
$
(25,198
)
 
$
(52,024)
   
$
(1,055,405
Foreign currency translation adjustment
           
     
 
Total comprehensive loss
 
$
(25,198
)
 
$
(52,024)
   
$
(1,055,405
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
 
 
F-4

 
 
SINOCUBATE INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Audited)
(Amounts expressed in US dollars)
 
   
Twelve months ended
   
January 1,
2004 (Date of
Inception of 
the
Development
Stage) to
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
 
Cash flows from operating activities
                 
Net loss
 
$
(25,198)
   
$
(52,024)
   
$
(1,055,405
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                       
Finance charges
           
     
27,387
 
Accrued interest on notes payable
           
     
31,414
 
Amortization
           
     
27,077
 
Accrued expenses and service costs assumed by majority shareholder
   
25,198
     
28,004
     
102,508
 
Foreign exchange effect on notes payable
           
     
5,303
 
Issuance of common stock for services
                   
1,000
 
Stock-based compensation
           
       24,020
     
28,480
 
Loss on disposition of equipment
                   
225,184
 
Write-down of intangible assets
                   
360,001
 
Write-off of payables
                   
(73,607
Write-off of notes payable
                   
(18,729
)
Gain on settlement of lawsuit
                   
(44,445
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
                   
(108,121
)
    Gain on sale of investments
                   
(31,874
)
    Other income
                   
(42,530
)
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
                       
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
                   
143,521
 
Cash used in continuing operations
                   
(422,836
Discontinued operations
                   
(171,213
                         
Net cash used in operating activities
   
     
     
(594,049
)
                         
Cash flows from investing activities
                       
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary
                   
1
 
Proceeds from assets disposition
   
     
     
5,458
 
Purchase of equipment
                   
(5,808
Net cash used in investing activities
   
     
     
(349
)
                         
Cash flows from financing activities
                       
Settlement of notes payable
   
     
     
398,614
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
   
     
     
1,000
 
                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
     
     
399,614
 
                         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
   
     
     
(14,734
)
                         
Change in cash
   
     
     
(209,518
                         
Cash, beginning of period
   
     
     
209,518
 
                         
Cash, ending of period
 
$
   
$
   
$
 
 
Supplemental cash flow information (Note 5).
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 

 
F-5

 
 
SINOCUBATE INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
(Audited)
(Amounts expressed in US dollars)
 
                                       
Deficit
       
                           
Accumulated
         
Accumulated
       
               
Additional
         
Other
         
During the
       
   
Common Shares
   
Treasury
   
Paid-in
   
Subscriptions
   
Comprehensive
         
Development
       
   
Number
   
Amount
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Received
   
Income
   
Deficit
   
Stage
   
Total
 
May 3, 1989 (Inception) through December 31, 1997
    60,022     $ 600     $     $ 9,400     $     $     $ (10,000 )   $     $  
Net loss
                                        (148,931 )           (148,931 )
Shares issued for cash
    180,000       1,800             148,200       2,000                         152,000  
Balance at December 31, 1998
    240,022       2,400             157,600       2,000             (158,931 )           3,069  
Net loss
                                        (511,587 )           (511,587 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  (14,130 )                 (14,130 )
Share issued for services
    15,000       150             124,850                               125,000  
Subscription receivable
    12,000       120             99,880       8,000                         108,000  
Share issued for intangible assets
    15,000       150             124,850                               125,000  
Balance at December 31, 1999
    282,022       2,820             507,180       10,000       (14,130 )     (670,518 )           (164,648 )
Net loss
                                        (339,063 )           (339,063 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  18,885                   18,885  
Shares issued for cash
    21,600       216             259,784                               260,000  
Shares issued for settlement of debt
    4,500       45             174,955                               175,000  
Subscription receivable
    600       6             9,994       (200 )                       9,800  
Subscription received
    30,000       300             499,700       (9,350 )                       490,650  
Stock option benefit
                      14,235                               14,235  
Balance at December 31, 2000
    338,722       3,387             1,465,848       450       4,755       (1,009,581 )           464,859  
Net loss
                                        375,621             375,621  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  13,629                   13,629  
Shares issued for cash
    300       3             2,247                               2,250  
Subscription received
                            200                         200  
Stock option benefit
                      118,920                               118,920  
Repurchase of common stock for treasury
                (270 )     (6,611 )                             (6,881 )
Balance at December 31, 2001
    339,022       3,390       (270 )     1,580,404       650       18,384       (633,960 )           968,598  
Net loss
                                          (63,864 )           (63,864 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                    (1,155 )                   (1,155 )
Shares issued for cash
    4,500       45             33,705                               33,750  
Balance at December 31, 2002
    343,522     $ 3,435     $ (270 )   $ 1,614,109     $ 650     $ 17,229     $ (697,824 )   $     $ 937,329  
 
 
F-6

 
 
SINOCUBATE INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
(Audited)
(Amounts expressed in US dollars)
 
                                             
Deficit
       
                                 
Accumulated
         
Accumulated
       
                     
Additional
         
Other
         
During the
       
   
Common Shares
   
Treasury
   
Paid-in
   
Subscriptions
   
Comprehensive
         
Development
       
   
Number
   
Amount
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Received
   
Income
   
Deficit
   
Stage
   
Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2002
   
343,522
     
3,435
     
(270
)
   
1,614,109
     
650
     
17,229
     
(697,824
)
   
     
937,329
 
Net loss
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
(607,630
)
   
     
(607,630
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
1,752
     
     
     
1,752
 
Stock option benefit
   
     
     
     
11,800
             
     
     
     
11,800
 
Cancellation of agreement
   
     
     
             
(650
)
   
     
     
     
(650
)
Share issues for cash on exercise of options
   
12,000
     
120
     
     
11,880
     
     
     
     
     
12,000
 
Share issues for consulting services
   
45,000
     
450
     
     
49,675
     
     
     
     
     
50,125
 
Share issues for intangible assets
   
60,000
     
600
     
     
104,400
     
     
     
     
     
105,000
 
Share issued for software
   
60,000
     
600
     
     
53,400
     
     
     
     
     
54,000
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
   
520,522
     
5,205
     
(270
)
   
1,845,264
     
     
18,981
     
(1,305,454
)
   
     
563,726
 
Net loss
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
(795,364
)
   
(795,364
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
(238
)
   
     
     
(238
)
Stock-based compensation
   
     
     
     
4,460
     
     
     
     
     
4,460
 
Shares issued for cash on exercise of options
   
1,000
     
10
     
     
990
     
     
     
     
     
1,000
 
Share issued for debt
   
140,000
     
1,400
     
     
68,600
     
     
     
     
     
70,000
 
Share issued for consulting services
   
2,000
     
20
     
     
980
     
     
     
     
     
1,000
 
Balance at December 31, 2004
   
663,522
     
6,635
     
(270
)
   
1,920,294
     
     
18,743
     
(1,305,454
)
   
(795,364
)
   
(155,416
)
Net loss
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
(54,416
)
   
(54,416
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
(702
)
   
     
     
(702
)
Share issues for consulting services
   
18,000
     
180
     
     
8,820
     
     
     
     
     
9,000
 
Balance at December 31, 2005
   
681,522
     
6,815
     
(270
)
   
1,929,114
     
     
18,041
     
(1,305,454
)
   
(849,780
)
   
(201,534
)
Net loss
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
(36,575
)
   
(36,575
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
563
     
     
     
563
 
Share issues for debt
   
50,000
     
500
     
     
24,500
     
     
     
     
     
25,000
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
   
731,522
   
$
7,315
   
$
(270
)
 
$
1,953,614
   
$
   
$
18,604
   
$
(1,305,454
)
 
$
(886,355
)
 
$
(212,546
)
Net loss
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
(170,950
)
   
(170,950
)
Discount on notes payable
   
     
     
     
20,573
     
     
     
     
     
20,573
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
(13,391
)
   
     
     
(13,391
)
Balance at December 31, 2007
   
731,522
     
7,315
     
(270
)
   
1,974,187
     
     
5,213
     
(1,305,454
)
   
(1,057,305
)
   
(376,314
)
Issuance of new shares
   
284,637
     
2,846
             
267,559
                                     
270,405
 
Cancellation of shares
   
(20,504
)
   
(205
   
270
     
(65
)
                                   
 
Services assumed by majority stockholder
                           
32,000
                                     
32,000
 
Change in par value of common share from $0.01 per share to $0.001 per share
           
(8,960
)
           
8,960
                                         
Net income
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
79,122
     
79,122
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
     
     
     
     
     
(5,213
)
   
             
(5,213
)
Balance at December 31, 2008 (audited)
   
995,655
   
$
996
   
$
   
$
2,282,641
                   
$
(1,305,454
)
 
$
(978,183
)
 
$
 
Services assumed by majority stockholder
                           
28,004
                               
  
   
28,004
 
Stock-based compensation 
                           
24,020
                                     
24,020
 
Net Loss
                                                           
(52,024
)
   
(52,024
)
Balance at December 31, 2009 (audited)
   
995,655
   
$
996
   
$
   
$
2,334,665
   
$
   
$
   
$
(1,305,454
 
$
(1,030,207
   
 
Services assumed by majority stockholder
   
     
     
     
25,198
                                     
25,198
 
Net Loss
   
     
     
     
 
                             
(25,198
   
(25,198
Balance at December 31, 2010 (audited)
   
995,655
     
996
     
   
$
2,359,863
     
     
     
(1,305,454
   
(1,055,405
   
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 

 
F-7

 

SINOCUBATE INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
 
Note 1
Financial Statements and Going Concern Assumption
 
These audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.  Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these audited financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  At December 31, 2010, the Company has accumulated losses of $2,360,859 since its inception and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.  Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but considers that the Company will be able to obtain additional funds by equity financing and/or related party advances; however there is no assurance of additional funding being available.

Note 2
Nature of business
 
Since November 2008, the Company has sought to enter into contractual arrangements with entities that allows the Company to either purchase outright the assets and/or business operations of such entities or to enter into business arrangements, such as joint ventures or similar combinations with such entities to manage and operate such entities.  The Company is a development stage company as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board  Accounting Standards Codification , or FASB ASC 915, “Development Stage Entities.”

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on May 3, 1989 as Sparta Ventures Corp. and remained inactive until June 27, 1998.  The name of the Company was changed to Thermal Ablation Technologies Corporation on October 8, 1998 and then to Poker.com, Inc. on August 10, 1999.  On September 15, 2003, the Company changed its name to LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. and on November 8, 2006, the name of the Company was changed to Synthenol Inc.  Effective November 3, 2008, the Company merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary, SinoCubate, Inc., which remained the surviving entity of the merger.  SinoCubate was formed in the State of Nevada on September 11, 2008.  The merger resulted in a change of name of the Company from Synthenol Inc. to SinoCubate, Inc. and a change in the state of incorporation of the Company from Florida to Nevada. 

On December 19, 2009, Viking Investments, LLC, an entity controlled and managed by Tom Simeo, the Company’s chairman, chief executive officer and president, announced a strategic partnership with Viking , whereby Viking, in exchange for a fee, and SinoCubate will work together and assist various business   entities in the Peoples Republic of China  or the PRC in their endeavors to become publicly listed companies in the United States of America.  In connection with the strategic agreement, the Company was to newly issue 4,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for  One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of   common stock of   Renhuang Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Renhuang owned by Viking, and newly issue 15,000,000  shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for entry into the strategic partnership agreement.  In connection with the foregoing transactions, Philip Wan and Yung Kong Chin were appointed directors and officers of the Company and were each granted warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.26 per share exercisable in whole or in part at any time during the 3 years after issuance.  Effective, March 26, 2010, the parties elected to terminate the strategic partnership agreement and the directors and officers appointed thereby, Messrs. Wan and Chin, resigned as directors and officers of the Company and agreed not to exercise their warrants to purchase the Company’s shares. The Company has subsequently cancelled the warrants.  No shares were issued to Viking and neither the Company nor Viking has monetary or other demand on the other related to the cancellation.
 
 
F-8

 

SINOCUBATE INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
 
As of the date of this Report, the Company has not entered into an agreement with any entity and there can be no assurance that the Company will ever be able to identify and enter into an agreement with an entity or whether, if the Company successful enters into an agreement with a suitable entity, such combination may become successful and/or profitable.

Note 3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 
a)
Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

 
b)
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and timing of revenues and expenses, the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company’s actual results could vary materially from management’s estimates and assumptions. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination expected tax rates for future income tax recoveries and the warrants.
 
 
c)
Other Comprehensive Income

FASB ASC 220 “Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. For the fiscal years ended December, 2010 and 2009, comprehensive income (loss) was ($25,198) and $(52,024), respectively.

 
d)
Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets likely. The Company did not incur any material impact to its financial condition or results of operations due to the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company is subject to U.S federal jurisdiction income tax examinations for the tax years 2006 through 2009. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2006 through 2009.

 
e)
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company may issue stock options to employees and stock options or warrants to non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company has adopted ASC Topic 718 (formerly SFAS 123R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, which establishes a fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans. In accordance with guidance now incorporated in ASC Topic 718, the cost of stock options and warrants issued to employees and non-employees is measured on the grant date based on the fair value. The fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The resulting amount is charged to expense on the straight-line basis over the period in which the Company expects to receive the benefit, which is generally the vesting period.
 
The fair value of stock warrants was determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option model requires management to make various estimates and assumptions, including expected term, expected volatility, risk-free rate, and dividend yield. The expected term represents the period of time that stock-based compensation awards granted are expected to be outstanding and is estimated based on considerations including the vesting period, contractual term and anticipated employee exercise patterns. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in relation to the contractual life of stock-based compensation instrument. The dividend yield assumption is based on historical patterns and future expectations for the Company dividends.
 
Assumption used to estimate the fair value of stock warrants on the granted date are as follows:
 
Issuance Date
 
Expected volatility
   
Risk-free rate
   
Expected term (years)
   
Dividend yield
 
December 16, 2009
    204.70 %     0.11 %     3       0.00 %
 
The stock warrants granted during 2009 were exercisable immediately, the fair value on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $24,020, and have been recorded as compensation costs. The Company did not issue any stock options or warrants during the year 2010 in which the Company cancelled all warrants issued in 2009.
 
 
f)
Financial Instruments
 
FASB defines fair value of a financial instrument as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:
 
·     Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
 
·     Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
·     Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
 
The Company has no financial instruments as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
 
g)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued Topic 105, which became the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Topic, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This Topic identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing the financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP and arranged these sources of GAAP in a hierarchy for users to apply accordingly. This Topic is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this topic did not have a material impact on the Company’s disclosure of the financial statements.
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 
F-9

 

SINOCUBATE INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
 
In September 2009, FASB amended ASC 605, as summarized in ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. As summarized in ASU 2009-13, ASC Topic 605 has been amended: (1) to provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated; (2) to require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have VSOE or third-party evidence of selling price; and (3) to eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The accounting changes in ASU 2009-13 are both effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. Adoption may either be on a prospective basis or by retrospective application. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of this statement will have on its financial position and results from operations and will adopt the provision of this statement in fiscal 2011.

In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.” The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. This ASU codifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 08-9, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” The amendments to the Codification provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. Consideration that is contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. Milestones should be considered substantive in their entirety and may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones, and each milestone should be evaluated individually to determine if it is substantive.

ASU 2010-17 is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year, the entity should apply 2010-17 retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. Vendors may also elect to adopt the amendments in this ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-17 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset, codifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-I, “Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset.” The amendments to the Codification provide that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40. ASU 2010-18 is effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of ASU 2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-18 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The ASU clarified the question of whether options granted to the Company’s Chinese employees which are denominated in United States dollars should be treated as equity or as a liability. The ASU provides that such options may be treated as equity if they are otherwise qualified for treatment as equity. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-13 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19, Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010 and require certain disclosure when an issuer’s subsidiary operates in a country in which there are multiple exchange rates. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-20 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-21, Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-21 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
There are no other Accounting Standards updates adopted by the Company or issued during the year, that had a material effect on the financial statements or that are expected to have a material impact on the financial statements in future periods.
 
Note 4
Related Party Transactions
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, Viking assumed professional and other service fee in the aggregate amount of $25,198.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Viking assumed professional and other service fee in the aggregate amount of $28,004.
 
 
F-10

 
 
SINOCUBATE INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
 
On April 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Viking, providing that effective August 15, 2008, Viking will pay for any services performed on behalf of the Company by third parties until such time that Viking is no longer the majority shareholder of the Company.
 
On December 19, 2009, the Company announced a strategic partnership with Viking , whereby Viking, in exchange for a fee, and SinoCubate will work together and assist various business   entities in the Peoples Republic of China  or the PRC in their endeavors to become publicly listed companies in the United States .  In connection with the strategic agreement, the Company was to newly issue 4,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for  One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of   common stock of   Renhuang Pharmaceutical, Inc. or Renhuang owned by Viking, and newly issue 15,000,000  shares of the Company’s common stock to Viking in exchange for entry into the strategic partnership agreement.  In connection with the foregoing transactions, Philip Wan and Yung Kong Chin were appointed directors and officers of the Company and were each granted warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.26 per share exercisable in whole or in part at any time during the 3 years after issuance.  Effective, March 26, 2010, the parties elected to terminate the strategic partnership agreement and the directors and officers appointed thereby, Messrs. Wan and Chin, resigned as directors and officers of the Company and agreed not to exercise their warrants to purchase the Company’s shares. The Company has subsequently cancelled the warrants.  No shares were issued to Viking and neither the Company nor Viking has monetary or other demand on the other related to the cancellation.
 
Note 5
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 
         
January 1,
 
         
2004 (Date
 
         
of
 
         
Inception of
 
         
the
 
         
Development
 
   
Fiscal years ended
   
Stage) to
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
 
Cash paid for:
                 
Interest
 
$
   
$
   
$
 
Income taxes (recovery)
 
$
   
$
   
$
(3,934
)
                         
Common shares issued to settle notes payable
 
$
   
$
   
$
295,405
 
Expenses assumed by principal stockholders
 
$
25,198
   
$
28,004
   
$
102,508
 
 
 
F-11

 

SINOCUBATE INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
 
Note 6 
Income Tax

The Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:
 
   
2010
   
2009