CAN CAL RESOURCES LTD - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - CAN CAL RESOURCES LTD	v218571_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - CAN CAL RESOURCES LTD	v218571_ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - CAN CAL RESOURCES LTD	v218571_ex31-1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-26669

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		86-0865852
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8205 Aqua Spray Ave.
Las Vegas, Nevada		89128
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (702) 243-1849

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 5% cumulative

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed first fiscal quarter. $2,342,128 based on a share value of $0.0790.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 35,066,203 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on April 14, 2011.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

None.

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

PART I		2
	Item 1. Business (and Information for Item 2 on Properties)	2
	Item 1A. Risk Factors	4
	Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	9
	Item 2. Properties	9
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings	27
	Item 4. Removed and Reserved	27

PART II		27
	Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	27
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data	30
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis	31
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	35
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	36
	Item 9. Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	37
	Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures	37
	Item 9B. Other Information	39

Part III		39
	Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	39
	Item 11. Executive Compensation	42
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	43
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	44
	Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services	44

Part IV		46
	15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	46

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the dates they are made. You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

·	the unavailability of funds for capital expenditures;

·	inability to efficiently manage our operations;

·	inability to achieve future operating results;

·	inability to raise additional financing for working capital;

·	the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans;

·	our ability to recruit and hire key employees;

·	our ability to diversify our operations;

·	actions and initiatives taken by both current and potential competitors;

·	deterioration in general or regional economic, market and political conditions;

·	the fact that our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we report our financial condition and results of operations, and they may require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain;

·	adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;

·	changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate; and

·	the other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report.

In this form 10-K references to “Can-Cal”, “the Company”, “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Can-Cal Resources Ltd.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Can-Cal files annual, quarterly, current and special reports and other information with the SEC. You can read these SEC filings and reports over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or on our website at www.can-cal.com. You can also obtain copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operations of the public reference facilities. We will provide a copy of our annual report to security holders, including audited financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us at Can-Cal Resources Ltd., 8205 Aqua Spray Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada 89128.

PART I

Item 1. Business (and Information for Item 2 on Properties).

Business Development

Can-Cal Resources Ltd. (“Can-Cal” or the “Company” ) is a Nevada corporation incorporated on March 22, 1995 under the name of British Pubs USA, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary of 305856 B.C., Ltd. d/b/a N.W. Electric Carriage Company (“NWE”), a British Columbia, Canada company (“NWE”). On April 12, 1995, NWE exchanged shares of British Pubs USA, Inc. for shares of NWE held by its existing shareholders, on a share for share basis. NWE changed its name to Can-Cal Resources Ltd. on July 2, 1996.

In January 1999, the company sold its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Scotmar Industries, Inc., which was engaged in the business of buying and salvaging damaged trucks from insurance companies for resale of guaranteed truck part components. The subsidiary was sold for a profit and the proceeds used to acquire and explore mineral properties, as the Company determined that the subsidiary would lose money in the vehicle salvage business unless more capital was obtained at that time specifically for that business.

Business of Issuer

The Company is an exploration company. Since 1996, we have examined various mineral properties prospective for precious metals and minerals and acquired those deemed promising. We own, lease or have mining interest in four mineral properties in the southwestern United States (California and Arizona, as follows: Wikieup, Arizona; Cerbat, Arizona; Owl Canyon, California; and Pisgah, California).

Prior to 2003, we performed more than 1,000 “in-house” assays on mineral samples from our properties in the United States. An assay is a test performed on a sample of minerals to determine the quantity of one or more elements contained in the sample. The in-house work was conducted with our equipment by persons under Can-Cal contract who are experienced in performing assays, but who were not independent of us. We also sent samples of materials from which we obtained the most promising results to outside independent assayers to confirm in-house results.

In 2003, the Company incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary in Mexico, Sierra Madre Resources S.A. de C.V. (“SMR”), to be an operating entity for mining-related acquisitions and activities in Mexico. In February 2004, SMR acquired a 100 % interest in a gold-silver mineral concession, in Durango State, Mexico. In July 2004, SMR applied to the Mexican Government for a gold-silver concession, also in Durango State, Mexico. These were exploration stage properties, referred to in previous Company reports as “Arco Project” and “Arco 2 Project”. In November 2004, SMR applied to Mexico’s Director of Mines for three grass roots, gold-silver exploration concessions located in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico. These applications were subsequently cancelled in February 2005 due to incomplete application filings. SMR may reapply for one or more of these concessions in the future, but has currently ceased operations in Mexico.

The Company’s current focus has changed from Mexico to the United States with present emphasis on the Pisgah Mountain material and Wikieup material.

All the United States properties are considered “grass roots” because they are not known to contain reserves of precious metals or other minerals (a reserve is that portion of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination). None of these properties is in production.

In 2005, we sold $11,500 of volcanic cinder materials arising from the Pisgah, California property to industrial users. As of June 1, 2005, we have discontinued sales of volcanic cinder materials.

Can-Cal is currently an exploration stage company. An entity remains in the exploration stage until such time as proven or probable reserves have been established for its deposits. Upon the location of commercially mineable reserves, if we are successful in locating commercially mineable reserves, the Company plans to prepare for mineral extraction and enter the development stage. To date, the exploration stage of the Company’s operations consists of contracting with geologists who sample and assess the mining viability of the Company’s claims.

To the extent that financing is available, we intend to explore, develop, and, if producible and warranted, bring into production precious metals properties for either on our own account or in conjunction with joint venture partners (in those instances where we acquire less than a 100% interest in a property). However, either due to a combination of a lack of available financing, the number of properties which merit development, and/or the scope of the exploration and development work of a particular property being beyond the Company’s financial and administrative capabilities, the Company may contract out one or more of its properties to other mining companies.

Executive offices are located at 8205 Aqua Spray Ave, Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 (tel. 702.243.1849; fax 702.243.1869).

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks that are inherent to our industry specifically, and to early stage companies and for investments in securities, generally. The following discusses some of the key inherent risk factors that could affect our business and operations, as well as other risk factors which are particularly relevant to us in the current period of significant economic and market disruption. Other factors besides those discussed below or elsewhere in this report also could adversely affect our business and operations, and these risk factors should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that may affect us.

Losses to Date and General Risks Faced by the Company.

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of precious metals mineral properties. To date, we have no producing properties. As a result, we have had minimal sources of operating revenue and we have historically operated and continue to operate at a loss. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the company recorded a net loss of $572,855 and had an accumulated deficit of $10,255,583 at that date. Our ultimate success will depend on our ability to generate profits from our properties.

We lack material operating cash flow and rely on external funding sources. If we are unable to continue to obtain needed capital from outside sources, we will be forced to reduce, curtail or cease our operations. Furthermore the, planned exploration and development of the mineral properties in which we hold interests depends upon our ability to obtain financing through:

	-	Bank or other debt financing,
	-	Equity financing, or
	-	Other means.

As a mineral exploration company, our ability to commence production and generate profits is dependent on our ability to discover viable and economic mineral reserves. Our ability to discover such reserves are subject to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control and are not predictable.

Exploration for gold is speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently unsuccessful. Any gold exploration program entails risks relating to:

	-	The location of economic ore bodies,
	-	Development of appropriate metallurgical processes,
	-	Receipt of necessary governmental approvals, and
		Construction of mining and processing facilities at any site chosen for mining.

The commercial viability of a mineral deposit is dependent on a number of factors including:

	-	The price of gold,
	-	Exchange rates,
	-	The particular attributes of the deposit, such as its size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, financing costs, taxation, royalties, land tenure, land use, water use, power use, and foreign government regulations restricting importing and exporting gold and environmental protection requirements.

All of the mineral properties in which we have an interest or right are in the exploration stages only and are without reserves of gold or other precious metals minerals. We cannot assure that current or proposed exploration or development programs on properties in which we have an interest will result in the discovery of gold or other mineral reserves or will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

The audit report on the financial statements at December 31, 2010 has a “going concern” qualification, which means we may not be able to continue operations unless we obtain additional funding and are successful with our strategic plan.

The Company has experienced losses since inception. The extended period over which losses have been experienced is principally attributable to the fact that a lot of money has been spent on exploring grass roots mineral properties to determine if precious metals might be present in economic quantities. In order to fund future activities the Company must identify and verify the presence of precious metals in economic quantities, which is currently ongoing “In House” in addition to independent third party testing. If economic results are identified, the Company then would either seek to raise capital itself, to put the Pisgah property and the Wikieup into production, or sell the properties to another company, or place the properties into a joint venture with another company.

Attaining these objectives will require capital, which the Company will have to obtain principally by selling stock or other equity in the company. However, we have currently have no definitive arrangements in place to raise the necessary capital to continue operations for any extended period of time, and have generally relied upon relatively small, and intermittent infusions to sustain operations.

As an exploration company, we are subject to the risks of the minerals business.

The exploration for minerals is highly speculative and involves risks different from and in some instances greater than risks encountered by companies in other industries. Without extensive technical and economic feasibility studies, no one can know if any property can be mined at a profit. Most exploration programs do not result in the discovery of mineralization that leads to commercially viable mining activities, and most exploration programs never recover the funds invested in them. Furthermore, even with promising reserve reports and feasibility studies, profits cannot be assured.

The British Columbia Securities Commission has required us to obtain a report by an independent consultant qualified under the standards of the BCSC.

The British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) has required the Company to obtain a report by an independent consultant qualified under the standards of the BCSC. Under British Columbia securities laws, all disclosure of scientific or technical information, including disclosure of a mineral resource or mineral reserve must be based on information prepared by or under the supervision of an independent third party who is “qualified” under the terms of that law. The Company is under order to supply such verification by a “qualified” third party consultant, and its stock may not trade in British Columbia until such verification is accepted by the BCSC. The BCSC has also requested documentation regarding all subscribers to the Company stock who are residents in British Columbia. The Company has retained such a “qualified” third party consultant who is in the process of preparing and filing the necessary reports with the BCSC and have provided documentation regarding substantially all subscribers, and continues to attempt to locate the remaining subscribers. If the BCSC continues with additional investigatory proceedings, it will require the Company to expend additional funds on legal and accounting fees, which will have a negative impact on our resources available for exploration and general operating activities.

We have not systematically drilled and sampled any of our properties to confirm the presence of any concentrations of precious metals, and drilling and sampling results to date have been inconclusive.

There is substantial risk that such testing on the United States properties would show limited concentrations of precious metals, and such testing may show a lack of precious metals in the properties. Any positive test results will only confirm the presence of precious metals in the samples, and it cannot be assumed that precious metals-bearing materials exist outside of the samples tested.

Policy Changes.

Changes in regulatory or political policy could adversely affect our exploration and future production activities. Any changes in government policy, in the United States or other countries where properties are or may be held, could result in changes to laws affecting ownership of assets, land tenure, mining policies, taxation, environmental regulations, and labor relations.

Environmental costs.

Compliance with environmental regulations could adversely affect our exploration and future production activities. There can be no assurance that future changes to environmental legislation and related regulations, if any, will not adversely affect our operations.

Future reserve estimates.

All of the mineral properties in which we have an interest or right are in the exploration stages only and are without reserves of gold or other minerals. Even if and when we can prove such reserves, reserve estimates may not be accurate. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to any calculation of reserves or resources. Until reserves or resources are actually mined and processed, the quantity of reserves or resources must be considered as estimates only. In addition, the quantity of reserves or resources may vary depending on metal prices. Any material change in the quantity of reserves, resource grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of our properties. In addition, there can be no assurance that mineral recoveries in small-scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in large tests under on-site conditions or during production.

Risks Related to Our Securities

Because our common stock is deemed a low-priced “Penny” stock, an investment in our common stock should be considered high risk and subject to marketability restrictions.

Since our common stock is a penny stock, as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Exchange Act, it will be more difficult for investors to liquidate their investment even if and when a market develops for the common stock. Until the trading price of the common stock rises above $5.00 per share, if ever, trading in the common stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the Securities Exchange Act specified in rules 15g-1 through 15g-10. Those rules require broker-dealers, before effecting transactions in any penny stock, to:

Deliver to the customer, and obtain a written receipt for, a disclosure document;

Disclose certain price information about the stock;

Disclose the amount of compensation received by the broker-dealer or any associated person of the broker-dealer;

Send monthly statements to customers with market and price information about the penny stock; and

In some circumstances, approve the purchaser’s account under certain standards and deliver written statements to the customer with information specified in the rules.

Consequently, the penny stock rules may restrict the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell the common stock and may affect the ability of holders to sell their common stock in the secondary market and the price at which such holders can sell any such securities. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.

If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, our common stock could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board, which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. More specifically, FINRA has enacted Rule 6530, which determines eligibility of issuers quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board by requiring an issuer to be current in its filings with the Commission. Pursuant to Rule 6530(e), if we file our reports late with the Commission three times in a two-year period or our securities are removed from the OTC Bulletin Board for failure to timely file twice in a two-year period then we will be ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

We have a limited number of personnel that are required to perform various roles and duties as well as be responsible for monitoring and ensuring compliance with our internal control procedures. As a result, our internal controls may be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

GENERAL

We own or have interests in four United States properties. They are:

Pisgah, San Bernadino County, California

Owl Canyon, California

Cerbat, Arizona

Wikieup, Arizona

A summary of important features about each of these properties is set forth in Exhibit 99.1 to our Form 10-KSB/A filed on March 11, 2009, and investors should take care to review this summary.

On September 26, 2006, the Company signed a letter of intent with E.R.S. Ltd., an Israeli owned Cyprus corporation with offices located in Tel Aviv. The letter of intent was to expand testing by E.R.S. on material from Can-Cal’s Pisgah property. The Company and E.R.S. did not enter into a definitive agreement in 2007.

In May and June 2006, Can-Cal acquired an additional 66 20-acre lode claims for the filing cost of $1,200. This increased the Company’s property holding to 1,900 acres or 2.97 square miles of 95 lode claims.

In April, June, July and September 2006, the Company conducted further surface sampling and rock wall sampling on its Wikieup, Arizona property. These samples were shipped to ALS Chemex, an internationally recognized assayer for fire assays (process of testing the original head ore material at high temperatures to determine the recoverability of precious metals) and I.C.P. tests. The preliminary assay results were encouraging and the Company will continue with further surface sampling from various areas of the approximate six square miles of claimed land.

On August 28, 2006, Can-Cal acquired an additional 1,800 acres from the Rose Trust in exchange for 1,000,000 restricted shares of its common stock. This increased the Company’s property holding on its Wikieup, Arizona property to 3,700 acres or approximately six square miles of 185 lode claims. The area is accessed by gravel road just off highway 93 approximately eight miles from the town of Wikieup, Arizona.

Adits (A type of entrance to underground mine shafts), tunnels and open pit locations following what may be a trend (direction that an ore body may follow) or vein structure (faults and cracks caused by shifts in the earth that had filled in with silica fluids and other magma volcanics which solidified leaving minerals behind) over a large region have been found on the property. The legacy of previous mining activity including; abandoned equipment, stone built homes, a cement water reservoir and numerous tailings piles, or piles of dirt left over from previous mining operations, can be seen from various locations.

The geology of the Wikieup area claims is comprised of Precambrian ganoids and gneiss. Outcrop is extensive on the property and rock units include diorite, gabbro and granitic dikes. The Company is continuing the surface sampling program and plans to hire an independent geologist for continued exploration.

In the United States, one property is owned (patented mining claims on a volcanic cinders property at Pisgah, California), one is leased with an option to purchase (the Cerbat property in Mohave County, Arizona), and two properties are groups of unpatented mining claims located on federal public land and managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”): the Owl Canyon property (23 miles northeast of Baker, California); and the Wikieup property (in Mohave County, Arizona).

In the United States, unpatented claims are “located” or “staked” by individuals or companies on federal public land. Each placer claim covers 160 acres and each lode claim covers 20 acres. The Company is obligated to pay a maintenance fee of $140 per claim per year to the BLM and file an Affidavit of Assessment Work with the County showing labor and improvements of at least $100 for each claim yearly.

If the statutes and regulations for the location and maintenance of a mining claim in the United States are complied with, the locator obtains a valid possessory right, or claim, to the contained minerals. Failure to pay such fees or make the required filings may render the mining claim void or voidable. We believe we have valid claims, but, because mining claims are self-initiated and self-maintained, it is impossible to ascertain their validity solely from public real estate records. If the government challenges the validity of an unpatented mining claim, we would have the burden of proving the present economic feasibility of mining minerals located on the claims.

PISGAH, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY

GENERAL TESTING. In 1997 we acquired fee title to a “volcanic cinders” property at Pisgah, San Bernardino County, California, for $567,000. The cinders material resulted from a geologically recent volcanic eruption.

The property is privately owned and is comprised of approximately 120 acres located 10 miles southwest of Ludlow, California, with a very large hill of volcanic cinders, accessible by paved road from Interstate 40. An independent survey service hired by the Company reported that there are approximately 13,500,000 tons of volcanic cinders above the surface. Approximately 3,500,000 tons of the cinders have been screened and stockpiled, the result of prior operations by Burlington Northern Railroad Co. It processed the cinders from the hill for railroad track ballast, taking all cinders above about one inch diameter and leaving the rest on the ground surface within one-quarter mile of the hill. The remaining material in the hill and the material left over from Burlington’s operations can easily be removed by front end loaders and loaded into dump trucks for hauling. The Cinder and Cinder #2 patented mining claims contain morphologically young alkali basalt and hawaiite lava flows and cinder (rock types created by volcanic activity). The cinder and spatter cone is about 100 meters high and has a basal diameter (circumference area at the base of the volcanic material) of about 500 meters, and was formed by the splattering of lava into a cone shape during volcanic activity. The volcanic cone and crater consists of unsorted basalis tephra (volcanic material), ranging from finest ash, through scoriascious cinders and blocks, or slag like structures born from igneous rock, to dense and broken bombs up to two meters in dimension.

The Company owns equipment which was acquired with the property, and is located on the property: a ball mill used for crushing cinders, truck loading pads, two buildings, large storage tanks, conveyors to load trucks, material silos and screening equipment.

The Pisgah property consists of patented claims we own; no fees have to be paid to the BLM or work performed on the claims to retain title to the property.

From 2000 through 2002, the Company ran numerous tests on the volcanic cinders property to determine if the material contains precious metals. Although the program indicated precious metals might exist in material taken from the Pisgah property, overall the program results were inconclusive.

Pisgah Property - Mining Lease

To generate working capital, as of May 1, 1998, we signed a Mining Lease Agreement for the Pisgah property with Twin Mountain Rock Venture, a California general partnership (“Twin Mountain,”). The Agreement is for an initial term of 10 years, with an option to renew for an additional ten-year term. Twin Mountain has the right to take 600,000 tons of volcanic cinders during the initial term, and 600,000 more tons during the additional term, for processing and sale as decorative rock. The material would be removed from the original cinder deposit, not the stockpiled material. Twin Mountain has not removed any material to date.

The agreement provides that Twin Mountain will pay minimum annual rental payments of $22,500 for the initial term and $27,500 per year for the additional term. Twin Mountain is also obligated to pay us a monthly production royalty for all material removed from the premises: The greater of 5% of gross sales f.o.b. Pisgah, or $.80 per ton for material used for block material; plus 10% of gross sales f.o.b. Pisgah for all other material. Against these payments, Twin Mountain will be credited for minimum royalty payments previously made.

Twin Mountain is current in payments, which are pledged to service company debt. Twin Mountain has not yet removed any material from the property and has not indicated when it would do so. Twin Mountain does not have the right to remove or extract any precious metals from the property; it does have the right to remove cinder material, which could contain precious metals (and Twin Mountain would have title to the removed cinder material), but it cannot process the materials for precious metals either on or off site.

Mining and reclamation permits, and an air quality permit have been issued by the California regulatory agencies in the names of both Twin Mountain and the Company. We posted a cash bond in the amount of $1,379 (1% of the total bond amount) and Twin Mountain has posted the remainder of the $137,886 bond. If Twin Mountain defaults, we would be responsible for reclamation of the property, but reclamation costs incurred in that event would be paid in whole or part by the bond posted by us and Twin Mountain. Reclamation costs are not presently determinable.

Pisgah Property - Debt Transactions

At December 31, 2009, we owed a second private lender (First Colony Merchant) a total of $760,291 including accrued interest, on three notes payable secured by a deed of trust and assignment of rents (payments under the Twin Mountain lease) on the Pisgah property. For additional consideration for part of the amounts loaned, the Company granted the lender a five-year option to purchase 300,000 restricted shares of common stock, at the lower of $0.65 per share or 50% of the lowest trading price during the month before exercise, payable in cash. The option was exercised in 2000 at $0.52 per share. In addition, in fiscal year 2000, as further consideration, we issued 45,000 restricted shares of common stock to a corporate affiliate of the lender as a loan placement fee. As of the filing date of this Annual Report, the Company is in default of principal and interest payments totaling $760,291.

Location and Access

The Pisgah Project is located in San Bernardino County, 72 kilometers (45 miles) east of the city of Barstow, California, and 307 kilometers (192 miles) south-southeast of Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Barstow lies near the southwest border of California, east of the junction of Interstate 15, Interstate 40 and U.S. Route 66. The Project is centered at Latitude 34o 44’ 47” North, Longitude 116o 22’ 29” West (See Figures 1, 2 and 3), or UTM (metric) co-ordinates 55700 E/384500 N in Zone 11, datum point NAD 27. It lies within the NW ¼ of Section 32, Township 8 North, Range 6 East from San Bernardino Meridian and has an area of 48.4 hectares (120.2 acres).

Access to the Pisgah Project is by the paved 2-lane paved road. From the junction of Interstate 15 and Interstate 40 just east of Barstow, California travel east along Interstate 40 for 52 kilometers (32.5 miles). Take the Hector Rd. Exit and turn right onto Hector Rd. From here turn left onto Historic Route 66 for 7.4 kilometers (4.6 miles), and then turn right (south) onto the Pisgah Crater road. Follow this road for 3.2 kilometers (2.0 miles) to the Pisgah Crater workings.

Pisgah Project

General Location Map

Pisgah Project

Regional Location Map

Pisgah Project

Township Location Map

Pisgah Project

Topography Map

OWL CANYON - S & S JOINT VENTURE

In 1996, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the Schwarz family covering approximately 425 acres of unpatented placer and lode mining claims in the Silurian Hills of California, known as Owl Canyon (the “S&S Joint Venture.”) The S & S Joint Venture has since reduced its holdings to 160 acres of lode claims and a five-acre mill site claim. These claims are prospective for precious metals and some base metals. The property is located approximately 23 miles northeast of Baker, California, accessible by 23 miles of paved and dirt road. The Company and the Schwarz family each have a 50% interest in the venture which is operated by a management committee, comprised of G. Michael Hogan, a director of the company, and Ms. Robin Schwarz.

Holding costs are approximately $160 per year for county and BLM filing fees for each of the eight lode claims, in accordance with filings under provisions of the “Small Miner Waiver”. Work must be performed on the property each year to keep title to the claims.

Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, we are funding the venture’s operations. Any income from the venture will first be paid to the Company to repay funds advanced to the venture or spent on its account, with any additional income divided 50% to the Company and 50% to the Schwarz family.

As the acquisition price of its 50% interest in the S & S Joint Venture, in 1996 the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of common stock to the Schwarz family.

Prior to 2003, the Company conducted extensive preliminary testing and assaying on the Owl Canyon property. Results indicate precious metals are present in material located on the Owl Canyon property, and further exploration is warranted. Upon conclusion of the trenching program conducted by Geochemist, Bruce Ballantyne, the assay results confirmed that the “Papa Hill” section of Owl Canyon should be a designated drill target in the future.

Geology Of Owl Canyon

Mineralization on the property migrates along north/south oriented faulting and at the contact point between metamorphic and dolomite rocks. Metalliferous deposits, or deposits filled with fine metal particles, along these fractures are prevalent near the central area of Owl Canyon. Along the southern side of the property, fault contact areas exhibit localized zone alteration from migrating hydrothermal fluids, or areas altered from hot lava and hydrothermal fluids due to volcanic activity, producing a mineralized vein ranging in width from approximately 18 to 36 inches.

We have performed external and in-house fire assays on material from the Owl Canyon property, sending both trench and rock samples to independent laboratories. Approximately 15 tons of material was removed to a depth of 3 to 4 feet to expose a continuation of one of the veins. An independent laboratory analyzed samples from this material.

A detailed structural and geologic mapping survey has been completed on the property, indicating some zones in certain areas are suitable exploration targets. Currently, work on this property has been suspended. This property is without known reserves and future work would be exploratory in nature. There was no significant activity on this property in 2007.

Location

The Silurian Hills are located in the Silurian Hills 15-minute quadrangle. The property is located in the northeastern corner of the 7.5 minute series topographic map entitled North of Bank Quadrangle California - San Bernardino County in Section 9, Township 16N, Range 9E. It is centered along the topographic feature known as Owl Canyon.

The area lies within the California Desert Conservation Area administered by the Bureau of Land Management. This agency identified the Silurian Hills as having high mineral potential for silver (1980) which led the County of San Bernardino to zone the area for mining and mineral exploration.

Access

From Interstate 15 at Baker, California, access is via California State Highway 127 for a distance of nine miles north of the service center town of Baker. At the Powerline Road junction turn right and travel on a USGS class 3 road generally under the Power Transmission Line for a further 9 miles. At this point turn to the left and head north to the Silurian Hills until metal gates are reached after 5 miles of slow, track-road, travel. This is the eastern boundary of the Owl Canyon Mineral Property.

Topography

Relief at the Owl Canyon Mineral Property area ranges from 650 meters to about 775 meters (elevation 2,000 to 3,000 feet above sea level). Locally, topographic relief is on the order of 1,000 feet in less than one half a mile along the Owl Canyon topographic feature.

CERBAT PROPERTY

On March 12, 1998, we signed a Lease and Purchase Option Agreement covering six patented mining claims in the Cerbat Mountains, Hualapai Mining District, and Mohave County, Arizona. The patented claims cover approximately 120 acres. We paid $10,000 as the initial lease payment and are obligated to pay $1,500 per quarter as minimum advance royalties. The Company has the option to purchase the property for $250,000, less payments already made. In the event of production before purchase, we will pay the lessor a production royalty of 5% of the gross returns received from the sale or other disposition of metals produced. Except for limited testing and evaluation work performed in mid- 2002, no work has been performed on this property since 1999. Access is north 15 miles from Kingman, Arizona on Highway 93, east from the historical market to Mill Ranch, then left three miles to a locked gate.

The country rock is pre-Cambrian granite, gneiss and schist complex. It is intruded by dikes of minette, granite porphyry, diabase, rhyolite, basalt and other rocks, some of which are associated with workable veins and are too greatly serieitized (altered small particles within the material) for determination. The complex is also flanked on the west by masses of the tertiary volcanic rocks, principally rhyolite. The mineralized body contains principally gold, silver and lead. They occur in fissure veins, which generally have a north-easterly trend and a steep north-easterly or south-westerly dip. Those situated north of Cerbat wash are chiefly gold bearing while those to the south principally contain silver and lead. The gangue (material that is considered to have base metals that are not precious or worth recovering for market value) is mainly quartz and the values usually favor the hanging wall. The Company has been informed by the owner that the property contains several mine shafts of up to several hundred feet in depth and tailings piles containing thousands of tons of tailings. The property has not produced since the late 1800’s.

The buildings on the property are practically valueless, owing to being in disuse for so many years.

We conducted (in late June and July 2002) a limited number of preliminary tests and assays on material taken from mine dumps (material left on the property from mining by others many years ago). It was anticipated that this material could be economically processed. However, the dump material tonnage will not support a small-scale operation without being supplemented with additional underground ore. We are considering selling or farming out the property, as there have been expressions of interest in the property from time to time. We have had no significant activity on Cerbat as of the date of this annual report.

Location and Access

The Cerbat Group of claims is located in the Hualapai Mining District about 15 miles north from Kingman which is the nearest railroad and supply point. The state highway from Kingman to Boulder Dam and Las Vegas passes within 4 miles of the property and a good County road connects the highway with the mining site. The County road passes through the Rolling Wave and Red Dog claims making transportation available to the lower workings. An old road connects the New Discovery shaft with the Cerbat workings near the crest of the hill. This group of claims is favorably situated for trucking and transportation purposes.

WIKIEUP PROPERTY

The Wikieup property consists of 2,400 acres or approximately 3.8 square miles of 120 lode claims. The lode claims are accessed via gravel road approximately eight miles just off Highway 93 at the town of Wikieup, Arizona.

Holding costs are approximately $155 per year for county and BLM filing fees, and work must be performed on the property each year to keep title to the claims.

The geology of the area is comprised of Precambrian ganoids and gneiss. Outcrop is extensive on the property and rock units include diorite, gabbro and granitic dikes. The Company has kept the claims in good standing by submission of the required rental fees. During the past nine months, the Company has conducted surface sampling of the rock units on the property for “In House” and independent third party companies’ analytical evaluation and assay tests. We are currently holding the property for further exploration. At the present time the property is without known reserves.

Location and Access

The Wikieup Project is located in southern Mohave County, 88 kilometers (55 miles) south of the city of Kingman, Arizona, and 253 kilometers (158 miles) southeast of Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Wikieup lies on Interstate 93. It occurs at Latitude 34o 44’ 47” North, Longitude 116o 22’ 29” West, the site of Wikieup, and west from there for approximately 19 kilometres (12 miles; Figures 1, 2 and 3). The Project is located 37 kilometers (23 miles) northwest of the mining camp of Bagdad, Arizona and 25 kilometers (16 miles) northwest of the mining camp of Bagdad, Arizona.

Access to the Wikieup Project is by the paved 2-lane Interstate 93 from the village of Wikieup. A few claims straddle the highway at Wikieup, but the main body of mining claims is accessed by heading west from the junction of Interstate 93 at Wikieup onto Chicken Springs Road and following various secondary and tertiary gravel and sand roads. Many of the tertiary roads require a 4-wheeldrive vehicle for access.

Wikieup Project

General Location Map

Wikieup Project

Regional Location Map

Wikieup Project

District Location Map

Wikieup Project

Geology Map

(b)(2) Distribution methods of products or services. Not applicable.

(b)(3) The Company has not publicly announced any new product(s) or service(s).

(b)(4) The evaluation and acquisition of precious metals, mining properties and mineral properties is competitive; as there are numerous companies involved in the mining and minerals business.

Exploration for and production of minerals is highly speculative and involves greater risks than exist in many other industries. Many exploration programs do not result in the discovery of mineralization and any mineralization discovered may not be of a sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. Also, because of the uncertainties in determining metallurgical amenability of any minerals discovered, the mere discovery of mineralization may not warrant the mining of the minerals on the basis of available technology.

The Company’s decision as to whether any of the mineral properties it now holds, or which it may acquire in the future, contain commercially mineable deposits, and whether such properties should be brought into production, will depend upon the results of the exploration programs and independent feasibility analysis and the recommendation of engineers and geologists. The decision will involve the consideration and evaluation of a number of significant factors, including, but not limited to: 1. The ability to obtain all required permits; 2. Costs of bringing the property into production, including exploration and development or preparation of feasibility studies and construction of production facilities; 3. Availability and costs of financing; 4. Ongoing costs of production; 5. Market prices for the metals to be produced; and 6. The existence of reserves or mineralization with economic grades of metals or minerals. No assurance can be given that any of the properties the Company owns, leases or acquires contain (or will contain) commercially mineable mineral deposits, and no assurance can be given that the Company will ever generate a positive cash flow from production operations on such properties.

(b)(5) The Company has processed and tested mineralized materials and produced very small amounts of precious metals on a testing basis. These have come primarily from testing material from the Pisgah Mountain, Wikieup, Cerbat and the Owl Canyon properties.

(b)(6) The Company is not dependent upon one or a few major customers.

(b)(7) The Company holds no patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, concessions, and has no labor contracts.

(b)(8) Exploration and mining operations in the United States are subject to statutory and agency requirements which address various issues, including: (i) environmental permitting and ongoing compliance, including plans of operations which are supervised by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and state and county regulatory authorities and agencies (e.g., state departments of environmental quality) for water and air quality, hazardous waste, etc.; (ii) mine safety and OSHA generally; and (iii) wildlife (Department of Interior for migratory fowl, if attractive standing water is involved in operations). See (b)(11) below. The Company has been added by San Bernardino County as a party to the Approved Mining/ Reclamation Plan and related permits, which have been issued for the Pisgah property. See Item 2, Description of Properties - Pisgah, California - Pisgah Property Mining Lease.

(b)(9) Because any exploration (and future mining) operations of the Company would be subject to the permitting requirements of one or more agencies, the commencement of any such operations could be delayed, pending agency approval (or a determination that approval is not required because of size, etc.), or the project might even be abandoned due to prohibitive costs.

Generally, the effect of governmental regulations on the Company cannot be determined until a specific project is undertaken by the Company.

(b)(10) The Company has expended a significant amount of funds on consulting, geochemical analytical testing, metallurgical processing and extracting, and precious metal assaying of material, however, the Company does not consider those activities as research and development activities. All those expenses are borne by the Company.

(b)(11) Federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of material into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Liability Act (“Superfund”) affect mineral operations. For exploration and mining operations, applicable environmental regulation includes a permitting process for mining operations, an abandoned mine reclamation program and a permitting program for industrial development. Other non- environmental regulations can impact exploration and mining operations and indirectly affect compliance with environmental regulations. For example, a state highway department may have to approve a new access road to make a project accessible at lower costs, but the new road itself may raise environmental issues. Compliance with these laws, and any regulations adopted there under, can make the development of mining claims prohibitively expensive, thereby frustrating the sale or lease of properties, or curtailing profits or royalties which might have been received there from. In 1997, the S & S Joint Venture spent approximately $32,000 to clean up areas of the Owl Canyon properties as requested by the BLM. The Company cannot anticipate what the further costs and/or effects of compliance with any environmental laws might be. The BLM approved the S&S Joint Venture trenching program at Owl Canyon without a requirement for bonding. The BLM approved the reclamation of this trenching program in 2000. BLM demanded further clean up of the mill site and surrounding area, and the Joint Venture complied with their request in 2000.

(b)(12) The Company presently has one full-time employee and relies on outside subcontractors, consultants and agents, to perform various administrative, legal and technical functions, as required.

OTHER FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company sold 2,926,600 units each consisting of one share and one warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s restricted common stock. The units were sold to various accredited Canadian investors for a total of $340,825 The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.15 per share and expire approximately two years from the date of issuance. These securities were issued in private transactions, with respect to the Canadian residents, in reliance on the exemption from registration with the SEC provided by Regulation S and with respect to the United States investor, in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Securities Act.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is not currently a party to litigation. The British Columbia Securities Commission previously required the Company to obtain a report by an independent consultant qualified under the standards of the BCSC. Under British Columbia securities laws, all disclosure of scientific or technical information, including disclosure of a mineral resource or mineral reserve must be based on information prepared by or under the supervision of an independent third party who is “qualified” under the terms of that law. The Company is under order to supply such verification by a “qualified” third party consultant, and its stock may not trade in British Columbia until such verification is accepted by the BCSC. The BCSC has also requested documentation regarding all subscribers to the Company stock who are resident in British Columbia. The Company retained such a “qualified” third party consultant who prepared and filed the necessary reports with the BCSC.

On April 24, 2009, the BCSC notified the Company of its decision to partially revoke the cease trade order (the “CTO”) that the BCSC issued on February 4, 2008, as to all outstanding shares of the Company trading to, from or within British Columbia. The BCSC had previously determined that the Company engaged in the sale on securities to various individuals and entities during the period between October 2004 through December 2007, and that a portion of these sales were sold without an exemption to the British Columbia, Canada, securities laws that require the delivery of a prospectus in connection with the sale of securities.

In revoking the CTO, the BSCS required that Can-Cal rescind all sales to British Columbia residents who purchased the securities of Can-Cal without the required exemptions (“Non-accredited Purchasers”). In meeting this condition, Can-Cal rescinded the sale of an approximate total of 263,748 shares of common stock of the Company and returned a total of approximately $67,913 of investment funds to the Non-accredited Purchasers. Through the date of this Annual Report, Can-Cal has rescinded of $55,788 of these investments. The Company continues to affect the rescission of the remaining outstanding shares.

Item 4. Removed and Reserved.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

(a) Market Information

Our Common Stock trades sporadically on the over-the-counter bulletin board market (OTC:BB) under the symbol CCRE. Our common stock has traded infrequently on the OTC:BB, which limits our ability to locate accurate high and low bid prices for each quarter within the last two fiscal years. Therefore, the following table lists the quotations for the high and low bid prices as reported by a Quarterly Trade and Quote Summary Report of the OTC Bulletin Board for the calendar years 2010 and 2009. The quotations from the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, markdown, or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

	2010				2009
	High		Low		High		Low
1st Quarter	$	0.14	$	0.04	$	0.013	$	0.001
2nd Quarter	$	0.13	$	0.07	$	0.035	$	0.007
3rd Quarter	$	0.09	$	0.04	$	0.019	$	0.006
4th Quarter	$	0.12	$	0.05	$	0.270	$	0.007

(b) Holders of Common Stock

As of March 31, 2011, there were approximately 564 holders of record of our Common Stock and 33,877,869 shares outstanding.

In the future we intend to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any, to finance the growth of the business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future dividends on the Common Stock will be the sole discretion of board of directors and will depend on our profitability and financial condition, capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

STOCK OPTION PLANS

THE CAN-CAL 2003 QUALIFIED INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN: The 2003 Qualified Incentive Stock Option Plan was established by the Board of Directors in June 2003 and approved by shareholders in October 2003. A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under this plan, which will be used to compensate senior executives and mid-level employees in the future. An option on 500,000 shares had been granted to Mr. Ciali under this plan. These options expired unexercised in 2006. An option on 300,000 shares had been granted to Anthony F. Ciali when he was appointed an officer of the company in March 2003. These options expired unexercised in 2006.

An option on 500,000 shares has been granted to Mr. Ronald Sloan with an exercise price of $0.20 in June 2006 under this plan. This option was exercisable upon issuance and expires in 2011. An option on 125,000 shares has been granted to Mr. James Dacyszyn with an exercise price of $0.20 in June 2006 under this plan. This option was exercisable upon issuance and expired in June 2008. An option on 125,000 shares has been granted to Mr. John Brian Wolfe with an exercise price of $0.20 in June 2006 under this plan. This option was exercisable upon issuance and expired in June 2008.

THE CAN-CAL 2003 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES, OUTSIDE DIRECTORS, AND CONSULTANTS: The 2003 Non-Qualified Option Plan was established by the Board of Directors in June 2003 and approved by shareholders in October 2003. A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under this plan. An option on 300,000 shares had been granted to Anthony F. Ciali, a former officer of the Company, when he was appointed an officer of the company in March 2003. These options expired unexercised in 2006. An option on 100,000 shares had been granted to Luis Vega when he signed a consulting agreement with the company in April 2003. Mr. Vega’s options expired unexercised in 2006.

The total number of options issued and outstanding at any time, under both the Qualified and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans will not exceed 10% of the company’s issued and outstanding common stock, calculated on a pro forma basis.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On December 31, 2010, Can-Cal and certain debenture holders of the Company agreed to exchange $128,800 in convertible debentures for Units a 2011 Private Placement, at a rate of US$0.06 per Unit (the “Debenture Exchange”). Under the 2011 Private Placement issued pursuant to exemptions under Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, Can-Cal completed the sale of 2,146,666 units of securities (each, a “Unit”) of the Company, which were issued on January 5, 2011, (the “2011 Private Placement”), at a price of US$0.06 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock (“Common Share”) and one Common Share purchase warrant (“Warrant”). Finders acting in connection with the private placement are entitled to receive aggregate fees of $2,790 and 46,500 Common Shares. The cancelled debentures exchanged in this Debenture Exchanged had provided 12% interest per annum and were convertible into common stock of Can-Cal, at the holder’s option, at US$0.25 per share (the “Debentures”).

On February 23, 2011, Can-Cal completed the sale of a second tranche of the 2011 Private Placement, including 1,020,000 Units of the Company at a price of US$0.06 per Unit, under the terms detailed, above. The Company received total aggregate gross proceeds of US$61,200.00 in the February 2011 sale. Finders acting in connection with the private placement are entitled to receive aggregate fees of $510 and 8,500 Common Shares.

The Company plans to use the proceeds of the sale for: ( i) the completion of its work-up of two extraction processes to determine which process, if either, will be used in the Company’s efforts to potentially prove up any precious metals, platinum groups elements and/or other base metals on the Company’s Pisgah, California site and Wikieup, Arizona site; (ii) conducting a drill program to potentially prove up potential tonnages and subsequently any precious metals and/or other base metals on the Wikieup, Arizona property; (iii) the undertaking of a comprehensive research and development program to ascertain the potential for any rare earth elements on the Owl Canyon, California site; (iv) the potential engagement of a qualified and comprehensive US and Canadian investor relations and shareholder communications group, and; (v) strategic working capital reserve.

Prior to the Debenture Exchange, the Company, pursuant to Regulation S, issued several tranches of securities, all of which were exchanged in the Debenture Exchange for securities in the January 2011 Unit Offering at $0.06 per Unit. The Debentures, totaling $128,800.00 in principal investments previously issued and exchanged for the Units are as follows:

·	December 31, 2010, $15,800 in Debentures

·	December 16, 2010, $45,500 in Debentures

·	October 6, 2010, a $5,000 in Debentures

·	October 5, 2010, a $2,500 Debenture

·	September 2, 2010, a $10,000 Debenture

·	August 30, 2010, $20,000 in Debentures

·	August 10, 2010, a $5,000 Debenture

·	June 10, 2010, a $25,000 Debenture

On February 19, 2010, pursuant to a private placement exemptions under Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, completed the final tranche of is US$350,000 non-brokered private placement, which was oversubscribed. The final tranche consisted of 1,144,000 units ("Units") at a price of US$0.125 per Unit for gross proceeds of US$143,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock of the Company ("Warrant"). Each Warrant is exercisable into one Common Share at US$0.15 per share until March 31, 2011. Including this tranche, the total gross proceeds that the Company received from the private placement, which commenced in May 2009 and ended February 19, 2010, was $370,825 in exchange for which the Company issued of a total of 2,966,600 shares of common stock and an equal number of Warrants.

The Company used the proceeds of the sale (i) for exploration and development of Can-Cal’s current properties, including ongoing laboratory processing and metallurgy testing in relation to precious metal extraction from Can-Cal’s Pisgah and Wikieup properties; (ii) to fund the rescission of certain prior sales of shares as detailed in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, and; (iii) for general working capital requirements.

The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decisions, including the Company’s financial statements and 1934 Act reports. The Company reasonably concluded that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their respective investments.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion of the business, financial condition and results of operation of the Company should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the section titled “Risk Factors.”

Overview

Can-Cal Resources Ltd. is a publicly traded exploration stage company engaged in seeking the acquisition and exploration of metals mineral properties. As part of its growth strategy, the Company will focus its future activities in the USA, with an emphasis on the Pisgah Mountain, California property and the Wikieup, Arizona property.

At December 31, 2010, we had approximately $17,000 cash available to sustain operations. Accordingly, we are uncertain as to whether the Company may continue as a going concern. While we may seek additional investment capital, or possible funding or joint venture arrangements with other mining companies, we have no assurance that such investment capital or additional funding and joint venture arrangements will be available to the Company.

We expect in the near term to continue to rely on outside financing activities to finance our operations. We used investment proceeds realized during 2010 for (i) completion of work-up of 2 potential extraction processes to determine which process we will employ to potentially prove up any precious metals, platinum groups elements and/or other base metals on the Pisgah, California property and the Wikieup, Arizona property, if any; (ii) the development of a drill program to potentially prove up any tonnages and precious metals and/or other base metals on the Wikieup, Arizona property, if any; (iii) the continued development a comprehensive research and development program to ascertain the potential for any rare earth elements on the Owl Canyon, California property; (v) strategic working capital reserve and (vi) to finance our operations. We expect that any additional funds received from financing activities that may occur in 2011 will be similarly deployed.

In addition to our historic exploration activities, we are currently analyzing potential, alternative revenue producing opportunities at our properties. The nature of such opportunities, if available, would provide relatively short term revenue. At Pisgah, for example, we are evaluating surface material that may have commercial use in connection with environmentally favorable agricultural products. We are currently in discussions with a potential partner for the production of these materials.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

	Years Ended December 31,						Increase /
	2010			2009			(Decrease)
	Amount			Amount			$			%
Expenses:
General & administrative	$	315,102		$	310,390		$	4,712		2	%
Exploration costs		12,981			44,044			(31,063	)	(71	%)
Depreciation		9,381			10,396			(1,015	)	(10	%)
Officer salary		120,000			110,000			10,000		9	%
Impairment of operating assets		-			1,248			(1,248	)	(100	%)
Total operating expenses		457,464			476,078			(18,614	)	(4	%)

Net operating loss		(457,464	)		(476,078	)		(18,614	)	(4	%)

Other income (expense):
Other income		3,598			-			3,598		100	%
Interest income		23			8			15		188	%
Rental revenue		29,791			31,900			(2,109	)	(7	%)
Interest expense		(148,803	)		(151,384	)		(2,581	)	(2	%)
Total other income (expense)		(115,391	)		(119,476	)		(4,085	)	(3	%)

Net loss	$	(572,855	)	$	(595,554	)	$	(22,699	)	(4	%)

Revenues:

We are an exploration stage company and had no revenue to recognize in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. As such, there were no comparative revenues or cost of revenues.

General and Administrative:

General and administrative expenses were $315,102 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $310,390 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $4,712 or approximately 2%. The increase in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 was due to increased rates related to professional services provided during 2010.

Exploration Costs:

For the year ended December 31, 2010, exploration costs were $12,981 compared to $44,044 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $31,063, or 71%. The decrease in exploration costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 is due to reductions in exploration activities at our Pisgah and Wikieup locations, however, we expect to significantly increase our exploration activities over the next twelve months.

Depreciation:

For the year ended December 31, 2010, depreciation expense was $9,381 compared to $10,396 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,015, or 10%. The decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 is due to diminishing depreciation expense as assets have become fully depreciated and have not been replaced.

Officer Salary:

For the year ended December 31, 2010, officer salary expense was $120,000 compared to $110,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $10,000, or 9%. The increase in officer salary expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 is due to a one month gap in compensation in 2009 as we transitioned to a new CEO. All salaries payable in 2010 were accrued, but not paid, and remain an obligation of the Company.

Impairment of Operating Assets:

Impairment of operating assets for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $-0- compared to $1,248 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,248, due to a one time impairment of an asset in 2009.

Net Operating Loss:

Net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $457,464, or ($0.02) per share, compared to a net operating loss of $476,078 for the year ended December 31, 2009, or ($0.02) per share, a decrease of $18,614 or 4%. Net operating loss decreased primarily due to reductions in exploration activities in 2010 compared to 2009.

Other Income:

Other income was $3,598 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $-0- for the year ended December 31, 2009. Other income was comprised entirely of debt forgiveness related to the conversion of previously issued convertible debentures settled through the issuance of equity outside of the terms of the convertible debentures. The note holders agreed to forgive all unpaid interest as part of the conversions.

Interest Income:

Interest income was $23 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $8 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $15, or 188%. The increase in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 is due to greater cash held in interest bearing savings accounts throughout 2010, compared to 2009.

Rental Revenue:

Rental revenue was $29,791 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $31,900 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $2,109, or 7%. The decrease in rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 is due to slightly less revenues received from special leasing projects in 2010 compared to 2009. Such revenues include, but are not limited to, sub-leasing land for video shoots and television commercials.

Interest Expense:

Interest expense was $148,803 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $151,384 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $2,581, or 2%, which included $74,403 and $78,961 of interest expense related to debt conversions pursuant to the issuance of warrants and related estimated valuations in from Black-Scholes calculations, during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Net Loss:

The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $572,855 compared to a net loss of $595,554 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decreased net loss of $22,699, or 4%. Net loss decreased primarily due to reductions in exploration activities in 2010 compared to 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes total assets, accumulated deficit, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and working capital at December 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009.

	December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
Total Assets	$	74,115		$	65,907

Accumulated (Deficit)	$	(10,255,583	)	$	(9,682,728	)

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	(1,385,448	)	$	(1,060,711	)

Working Capital (Deficit)	$	(1,423,934	)	$	(1,107,811	)

At December 31, 2010, we had total assets of $74,115, consisting principally of cash, prepaid expenses and property and equipment. We have implemented financial controls in the business to ensure each expense is warranted and needed.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind.

Contractual Obligations

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments. The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 and for the future periods identified. The exploration of our properties, changes in our business needs and other factors may result in our incurring significant future obligations which would impact our cash and liquidity position and requirements. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments.

Payments Due By Period
Contractual Cash Obligations	Total	Less than One Year	1-3 Years	3-5 Years	After 5 Years
Repayment of debt (1)	$888,273	$888,273	$ --	$ --	$ --

Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$888,273	$888,273	$ --	$ --	$ --

(1) Includes total principal amounts of $417,741 and interest of $470,532.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, business combination purchase price allocations, our review for impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense. Actual results may differ from these judgments and estimates, and they may be adjusted as more information becomes available. Any adjustment may be significant.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably may have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur may materially impact the financial statements. We refer readers to Note 1 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with this Annual Report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 contained in the “Notes to the Financial Statements” for a discussion of new and recently adopted accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-1

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-2

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-3

Statement of Stockholders' (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-4

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-5

Notes to Financial Statements			F-6

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Can-Cal Resources Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Can-Cal Resources Ltd. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the period from inception (March 22, 1995) to December 31, 2010. Can-Cal Resources Ltd.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Can-Cal Resources Ltd. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the period from inception (March 22, 1995) to December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statement, the Company suffered net losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ L. L. Bradford & Company, LLC

Las Vegas, Nevada

April 15, 2011

F-1

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash	$	17,202		$	17,507
Other current assets		18,427			1,300
Total current assets		35,629			18,807

Property and equipment (net of accumulated
depreciation of $27,454 and $146,743, respectively)		38,486			47,100

Total assets	$	74,115		$	65,907


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	98,795		$	55,598
Accounts payable, related parties		60,000			-
Accrued interest		470,532			417,008
Accrued salaries		403,328			282,004
Notes payable, including related party amounts of $57,191
and $-0- at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		417,741			360,550
Unearned rental revenues		9,167			11,458
Total current liabilities		1,459,563			1,126,618

Total liabilities		1,459,563			1,126,618

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 30,711,203 and 30,698,196 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		30,711			30,698
Subscription receivable, -0- and 200,000 shares at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		-			(25,000	)
Subscriptions payable, 2,193,166 and -0- shares at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		131,590			-
Rescission liability receivable		-			(12,125	)
Additional paid-in capital		8,707,834			8,628,444
(Deficit) accumulated during exploration stage		(10,255,583	)		(9,682,728	)
Total stockholders' (deficit)		(1,385,448	)		(1,060,711	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit)	$	74,115		$	65,907

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-2

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							March 22, 1995
	For the year ended						(inception) to
	December 31,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2010

Material sales	$	-		$	-		$	245,500
Cost of sales		-			-			263,400

Gross loss		-			-			(17,900	)

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		315,102			310,390			6,698,728
Exploration costs		12,981			44,044			549,350
Depreciation		9,381			10,396			250,554
Officer salary		120,000			110,000			961,176
Impairment of operating assets		-			1,248			443,772
Total operating expenses		457,464			476,078			8,903,580

Net operating loss		(457,464	)		(476,078	)		(8,921,480	)

Other income (expense):
Other income		3,598			-			50,798
Interest income		23			8			52,945
Rental revenue		29,791			31,900			355,908
Gain on sale of fixed assets		-			-			26,801
Interest expense		(148,803	)		(151,384	)		(1,346,955	)
Total other income (expense)		(115,391	)		(119,476	)		(860,503	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(572,855	)		(595,554	)		(9,781,983	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-

Net loss from continuing operations		(572,855	)		(595,554	)		(9,781,983	)

Income from discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations		-			-			116,400
Loss on disposal of operations (net of taxes)		-			-			(590,000	)


Net (loss)	$	(572,855	)	$	(595,554	)	$	(10,255,583	)


Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic and fully diluted		30,733,602			27,365,972

Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-3

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

																								(Deficit)
																		Foreign						accumulated
	Common stock											Rescission						currency			Additional			during			Total
	Number of						Subscription			Subscription		liability			Unamortized			translation			paid-in			exploration			stockholders'
	shares			Amount			receivable			payable		receivable			equity grants			adjustment			capital			stage			equity (deficit)
Balance, March 22, 1995		-		$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Common shares issued for services		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			-			-			-
Net loss																									(1,000	)		(1,000	)

Balance, December 31, 1995		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			-			(1,000	)		(1,000	)

Common shares issued for services		3,441,217			3,400			-			-		-			-			-			625,000			-			628,400
Prior period adjustment, investment in joint venture		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			-			497,900			497,900
Net loss																									(497,000	)		(497,000	)

Balance, December 31, 1996		3,441,217			3,400			-			-		-			-			-			625,000			(100	)		628,300

Common shares issued for services		3,006,435			3,000			-			-		-			-			-			1,051,400			-			1,054,400
Net loss																									(1,044,700	)		(1,044,700	)

Balance, December 31, 1997		6,447,652			6,400			-			-		-			-			-			1,676,400			(1,044,800	)		638,000

Common shares issued for cash		557,509			600			-			-		-			-			-			211,200			-			211,800
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-			-			-			-		-			-			8,500			-			-			8,500
Net loss																									(353,000	)		(353,000	)

Balance, December 31, 1998		7,005,161			7,000			-			-		-			-			8,500			1,887,600			(1,397,800	)		505,300

Common shares issued for cash		1,248,621			1,200			-			-		-			-			-			572,600			-			573,800
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-			-			-			-		-			-			(11,800	)		-			-			(11,800	)
Realized foreign currency translation loss		-			-			-			-		-			-			3,300			-			-			3,300
Prior period Adjustment		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			-			15,000			15,000
Elimination of subsidiary upon disposal		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			-			116,400			116,400
Net loss																									(1,038,500	)		(1,038,500	)

Balance, December 31, 1999		8,253,782			8,200			-			-		-			-			-			2,460,200			(2,304,900	)		163,500

Common shares issued for cash		1,119,009			1,200			-			-		-			-			-			948,400			-			949,600
Net loss																									(962,500	)		(962,500	)

Balance, December 31, 2000		9,372,791			9,400			-			-		-			-			-			3,408,600			(3,267,400	)		150,600

Common shares issued for cash		785,947			800			-			-		-			-			-			81,500			-			82,300
Net loss																									(704,500	)		(704,500	)

Balance, December 31, 2001		10,158,738			10,200			-			-		-			-			-			3,490,100			(3,971,900	)		(471,600	)

Common shares issued for cash		1,093,280			1,100			-			-		-			-			-			269,900			-			271,000
Common shares issued for services		92,292			100			-			-		-			-			-			23,800			-			23,900
Options granted for services		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			7,100			-			7,100
Common shares issued for repayment of note
payable, related party in the amount of
$119,800, including accrued interest of $71,800		309,677			300			-			-		-			-			-			119,500			-			119,800
Warrants granted for loan fees on
convertible notes payable, related party		-			-			(16,700	)		-		(16,700	)		(16,700	)		-			16,700			-			(33,400	)
Common shares issued for loan fees on
convertible notes payable, related party		30,000			-			(13,500	)		-		(13,500	)		(13,500	)		-			13,500			-			(27,000	)
Deemed interest on beneficial conversion
feature of notes payable, related party		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			20,500			-			20,500
Amortization of loan fees		-			-			8,200			-		8,200			8,200			-			-			-			24,600
Net loss																									(709,300	)		(709,300	)

Balance, December 31, 2002		11,683,987			11,700			(22,000	)		-		(22,000	)		(22,000	)		-			3,961,100			(4,681,200	)		(774,400	)

Common shares issued for cash		823,410			800			-			-		-			-			-			163,900			-			164,700
Common shares issued for services		381,260			400			-			-		-			-			-			63,800			-			64,200
Options granted for services		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			61,300			-			61,300
Common shares issued for repayment of note
payable, related party common shares issued for
repayment of note payable, related party in the
amount of $78,300, including accrued interest of $43,300		364,305			400			-			-		-			-			-			77,900			-			78,300
Deemed interest on beneficial conversion
feature of notes payable, related party		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			38,300			-			38,300
Amortization of loan fees		-			-			15,000			-		15,000			15,000			-			-			-			45,000
Net loss																									(711,100	)		(711,100	)

Balance, December 31, 2003		13,252,962			13,300			(7,000	)		-		(7,000	)		(7,000	)		-			4,366,300			(5,392,300	)		(1,033,700	)

Common shares issued for cash		1,564,311			1,600			-			-		-			-			-			306,400			-			308,000
Common shares issued for exercise of warrants		701,275			700			-			-		-			-			-			124,900			-			125,600
Common shares issued for services		390,224			400			-			-		-			-			-			73,800			-			74,200
Warrants granted for services		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			12,200			-			12,200
Interest expense for warrants granted		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			280,200			-			280,200
Common shares issued in satisfaction of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities in the amount of $229,400		917,747			900			-			-		-			-			-			228,500			-			229,400
Common shares issued for repayment of note
payable in the amount of $99,700, including accrued interest of $14,700		702,760			700			-			-		-			-			-			99,000			-			99,700
Common shares issued for repayment of note
payable, related party in the amount of $82,700		330,747			300			-			-		-			-			-			82,400			-			82,700
Deemed interest on beneficial conversion
feature of notes payable, related party		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			17,600			-			17,600
Amortization of loan fees		-			-			7,000			-		7,000			7,000			-			-			-			21,000
Net loss																									(1,030,500	)		(1,030,500	)

Balance, December 31, 2004		17,860,026			17,900			-			-		-			-			-			5,591,300			(6,422,800	)		(813,600	)

Common shares issued for cash		762,500			800			-			-		-			-			-			152,700			-			153,500
Common shares issued for exercise of warrants		349,545			300			-			-		-			-			-			69,500			-			69,800
Net loss																									(421,800	)		(421,800	)

Balance, December 31, 2005		18,972,071			19,000			-			-		-			-			-			5,813,500			(6,844,600	)		(1,012,100	)

Common shares issued for cash		2,448,213			2,400			-			-		-			-			-			642,100			-			644,500
Common warrants exercised for cash		174,000			200			-			-		-			-			-			43,300			-			43,500
Common shares issued for services		19,500			-			-			-		-			-			-			5,000			-			5,000
Common shares issued in satisfaction of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities		385,714			400			-			-		-			-			-			80,600			-			81,000
Common shares issued in satisfaction of notes
payable-related parties		56,821			100			-			-		-			-			-			11,800			-			11,900
Common shares issued in satisfaction of convertible
debenture, (including accrued interest of $1,895)		206,767			200			-			-		-			-			-			41,700			-			41,900
Common shares issued for asset acquisition		1,000,000			1,000			-			-		-			-			-			399,000			-			400,000
Option granted to officers and directors		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			123,500			-			123,500
Warrants granted for services		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			2,200			-			2,200
Warrants granted in satisfaction of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			65,400			-			65,400
Warrants granted in satisfaction of notes
payable-related parties		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			9,600			-			9,600
Warrants granted in satisfaction of convertible
debenture		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			40,000			-			40,000
Net loss																									(621,000	)		(621,000	)

Balance, December 31, 2006 (Restated)		23,263,086			23,264			-			-		-			-			-			7,277,736			(7,465,600	)		(164,600	)

Common shares issued for cash		492,795			492			-			-		-			-			-			188,698			-			189,190
Common warrants exercised for cash		745,372			745			-			-		-			-			-			185,598			-			186,343
Common shares issued for services		4,000			4			-			-		-			-			-			2,010			-			2,014
Common shares issued in satisfaction of
accrued wages of $22,000, related party		50,000			50			-			-		-			-			-			21,950			-			22,000
Debt forgiveness, related party		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			147,419			-			147,419
Net loss																									(604,913	)		(604,913	)

Balance, December 31, 2007 (Restated)		24,555,253			24,555			-			-		-			-			-			7,823,411			(8,070,513	)		(222,547	)

Common shares issued for cash		32,500			33			-			-		-			-			-			8,091			-			8,124
Net loss																									(1,016,661	)		(1,016,661	)

Balance, December 31, 2008		24,587,753			24,588			-			-		-			-			-			7,831,502			(9,087,174	)		(1,231,084	)

Common shares issued for cash		2,926,600			2,926			(25,000	)		-		-			-			-			362,899			-			340,825
Common shares issued for debt conversion to related
parties of $398,593, including accrued interest of $29,093		3,188,741			3,189			-			-		-			-			-			395,404			-			398,593
Warrants granted in connection with debt conversion		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			78,961			-			78,961
Common shares issued for services		122,000			122			-			-		-			-			-			15,338			-			15,460
Common shares cancelled per rescission order		(126,898	)		(127	)		-			-		-			-			-			(55,660	)		-			(55,787	)
Rescission liability receivable		-			-			-			-		(12,125	)		-			-			-			-			(12,125	)
Net loss																						-			(595,554	)		(595,554	)

Balance, December 31, 2009		30,698,196			30,698			(25,000	)		-		(12,125	)		-			-			8,628,444			(9,682,728	)		(1,060,711	)

Common shares issued for cash		40,000			40			25,000			-		-			-			-			4,960			-			30,000
Receipt of payment on rescission liability receivable		-			-			-			-		12,125			-			-			-			-			12,125
Common shares awarded for debt conversion, 2,146,666 shares		-			-			-			128,800		-			-			-			-			-			128,800
Finance costs on inducement of conversion, 2,146,666 warrants		-			-			-			-		-			-			-			74,403			-			74,403
Common shares awarded for commissions, 46,500 shares		-			-			-			2,790		-			-			-			-			-			2,790
Common shares cancelled		(26,993	)		(27	)		-			-		-			-			-			27			-			-
Net loss																									(572,855	)		(572,855	)

Balance, December 31, 2010		30,711,203		$	30,711		$	-		$	131,590	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	8,707,834		$	(10,255,583	)	$	(1,385,448	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-4

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							March 22, 1995
	For the year ended						(inception) to
	December 31,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(572,855	)	$	(595,554	)	$	(10,255,583	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		9,381			10,396			267,554
Bad debts		-			-			207,100
Gain on sale of fixed assets		-			-			(6,501	)
Stock based compensation granted for services		2,790			15,460			551,064
Stock based compensation granted for financing and interest		74,403			78,961			676,564
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debenture		-			-			25,200
Loss on disposal of investment property		-			-			938,600
Undistributed earnings of affiliate		-			-			(174,300	)
Gain on discontinued operations		-			-			(116,400	)
Loss on foreign currency translation		-			-			8,500
Impairment of operating assets		-			3,143			445,667
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Other current assets		(17,127	)		(1,200	)		(111,022	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		43,197			(45,670	)		30,883
Accounts payable, related parties		60,000			-			60,000
Accrued interest		53,524			69,983			499,625
Accrued salaries		121,324			70,315			403,328
Unearned revenues		(2,291	)		-			9,167
Net cash used in operating activities		(227,654	)		(394,166	)		(6,540,554	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of investment property		-			-			(1,083,600	)
Proceeds from sale of investment property		-			-			319,300
Puchase of property and equipment		(767	)		-			(769,411	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		-			-			26,100
Net cash used in investing activities		(767	)		-			(1,507,611	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from convertible debentures		128,800			-			128,800
Proceeds from notes payable		-			-			948,400
Principal payments on notes payable		-			-			(689,900	)
Proceeds from notes payable, related parties		62,191			31,800			907,791
Principal payments on notes payable, related parties		(5,000	)		(6,800	)		(379,050	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		42,125			340,825			7,149,326
Net cash provided by financing activities		228,116			365,825			8,065,367

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(305	)		(28,341	)		17,202
Cash, beginning of period		17,507			45,848			-
Cash, end of period	$	17,202		$	17,507		$	17,202

Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Shares issued for debt conversion	$	128,800		$	398,594
Shares and warrants issued for financing	$	-		$	78,961
Recission liability	$	-		$	67,912

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-5

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

Can-Cal Resources Ltd. (“Can-Cal” or the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation incorporated on March 22, 1995.

The Company is an exploration company engaged in the exploration for precious metals, specifically focused on gold exploration projects. We have examined various prospective mineral properties for precious metals and acquired those deemed promising. We currently own, lease or have mining interest in four mineral properties in the southwestern United States (California and Arizona, as follows: Wikieup, Arizona; Cerbat, Arizona; Owl Canyon, California; and Pisgah, California).

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar (USD). Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ASC 820, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in the Canadian dollar (CDN). The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

Certain amounts in the prior periods presented have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.

Exploration Stage Company

The Company is currently an exploration stage company. As an exploration stage enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the exploration stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception to the current balance sheet date. The Company has incurred net losses of $10,255,583 and used net cash in operations of $6,540,554 for the period from inception (March 22, 1995) through December 31, 2010. An entity remains in the exploration stage until such time as proven or probable reserves have been established for its deposits. Upon the location of commercially mineable reserves, the Company plans to prepare for mineral extraction and enter the development stage. To date, the exploration stage of the Company’s operations consists of contracting with geologists who sample and assess the mining viability of the Company’s claims.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include money market accounts which have maturities of three months or less. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates market value.

Long-Lived Assets

Fixed assets are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated net recoverable amount, and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset as follows:

Machinery and equipment	7-15 years
Transportation equipment	5 years
Furniture and fixtures	7 years

F-6

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Maintenance and repairs will be charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments will be capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation will be removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, will be reflected in operations.

The Company will assess the recoverability of equipment by determining whether the depreciation and amortization of these assets over their remaining life can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of equipment impairment, if any, will be measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which such impairment is determined by management.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, the Financial Accounting Standards Board establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement reaffirms that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements as reflected herein. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheets are estimated by management to approximate fair value primarily due to the short term nature of the instruments. The Company had no items that required fair value measurement on a recurring basis.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For 2010, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted FASB guidance on stock based compensation. Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Stock and stock options issued for services and compensation totaled $77,193 and $94,421 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, based on the fair value of the common stock at the grant date.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

Uncertain Tax Positions

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be capable of withstanding examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. These standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. The Company has not yet undergone an examination by any taxing authorities.

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

Mineral Claim Payments and Exploration Expenditures

The Company is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred. We assess the carrying cost for impairment under the FASB ASC topic 360 at each fiscal quarter end. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs subsequently incurred to develop such property are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the established life of the proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.

F-7

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations.” This update changes the disclosure of pro forma information for business combinations. These changes clarify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. Also, the existing supplemental pro forma disclosures were expanded to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. These changes become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011. The Company’s adoption of this update did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangible –Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts.” This update requires an entity to perform all steps in the test for a reporting unit whose carrying value is zero or negative if it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that a goodwill impairment exists based on qualitative factors, resulting in the elimination of an entity’s ability to assert that such a reporting unit’s goodwill is not impaired and additional testing is not necessary despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate otherwise. These changes become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 – Receivable – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“Subtopic 310-30”). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)" (“ASU 2010-13”). ASU 2010-13 clarifies that a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an award should not be classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. This clarification of existing practice is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010, with early application permitted. The Company’s adoption of this update did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 regarding subsequent events and amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements. Under this ASU, a public company that is a SEC filer, as defined, is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU is effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers. Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.

F-8

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2 – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $572,855 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and had a working capital deficit of $1,423,934 at December 31, 2010. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its new business opportunities. Management has plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offerings of its common stock. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on securing additional sources of capital and the success of the Company’s plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Related Party

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we received a total of $28,191 in exchange for an unsecured note payable to our CEO, G. Michael Hogan, due on demand, bearing interest at 8.00%.

On November 12, 2010, we received a short term loan of $9,000 in exchange for a non-interest bearing, unsecured note payable to an employee, due on demand. On December 30, 2010 the Company repaid $5,000, and the remaining $4,000 was subsequently repaid in February of 2011.

On July 1, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month employment agreement, subject to automatic monthly renewals, with the Company’s CEO, G. Michael Hogan. The terms of the agreement include a fixed annual salary of $120,000. The Company may elect to satisfy payment in shares of common stock in lieu of cash at a market value equal to $0.10 above the average closing trading price of the common stock for the preceding five (5) days from the date of such election. No payments have been made in cash or stock as of September 30, 2010.

We owed $282,004 and $282,004 of accrued salaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to our former CEO, respectively. In addition, we owed $120,000 of accrued salaries to our current CEO as of December 31, 2010.

On June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement, with a Board of Director’s consulting firm, Futureworth Capital Corp. The terms of the agreement include annual compensation of $60,000, payable monthly. The Company may elect to satisfy payment in shares of common stock in lieu of cash at a market value equal to $0.10 above the average closing trading price of the common stock for the preceding five (5) days from the date of such election. No payments have been made in cash or stock as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010 we owed Futureworth Capital Corp. $60,000, as included in accounts payable, for service prior to, and during the service period under the consulting agreement.

On September 1, 2010, we received $25,000 in exchange for an unsecured note payable to a Board of Director’s consulting firm, Futureworth Capital Corp, due on demand, bearing interest at 8.25%.

Note 4 – Capitalized Mineral Costs

Mineral rights are recorded at cost of acquisition. When there is little likelihood of a mineral right being exploited; the value of mineral rights have diminished below cost, or the economic feasibility of extraction is limited, a write-down is affected against income in the period that such determination is made. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded a write down in the amount of $-0- and $1,248, respectively. Non-mining assets are recorded at cost of acquisition. These assets include the assets of the mining operation not included in the previous categories and all the assets of the non-mining operations. Mining assets, including mine development and infrastructure costs and mine plant facilities, are recorded at cost of acquisition. Expenditure incurred to evaluate and develop new ore bodies, to define mineralization in existing ore bodies, to establish or expand productive capacity, is capitalized until commercial levels of production are achieved, at which time the costs will be amortized.

F-9

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 – Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment consists of the following:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009

Machinery and equipment	$	33,386		$	140,023
Transportation equipment		31,787			39,084
Furniture and fixtures		767			14,736
		65,940			193,843
Less accumulated depreciation		(27,454	)		(146,743	)
	$	38,486		$	47,100

Depreciation expense totaled $9,381 and $10,396 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

During 2010, we disposed of a total of $128,671 of fully depreciated property and equipment that was no longer in service. No proceeds were received from the disposals. The disposals by classification of property and equipment are as follows:

	December 31,
	2010

Machinery and equipment	$	106,638
Transportation equipment		7,298
Furniture and fixtures		14,735
	$	128,671

Note 6 – Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2010		2009

Note payable to a stockholder, secured by real property, bearing interest at 16.0% per annum, interest only payments payable in semi-annual payments, matured November 2005 (Note: The Company is in default of interest payments totaling $424,000 and $388,000 of principal, respectively).	$	300,000	$	300,000

Note payable to a stockholder, secured by real property, bearing interest at 8.0% per annum, matured July 2008, and is currently in default.		25,114		25,114

Note payable to a stockholder, secured by real property, bearing interest at 8.0% per annum, matured June 2008, and is currently in default.		35,436		35,436

Note payable, unsecured, non-interest bearing note to an employee due on demand, related party.		4,000		-

Note payable to a member of the Board of Directors, unsecured, due on demand, bearing interest at 8.25%, related party.		25,000		-

Note payable to the CEO, unsecured, non-interest bearing, due on demand, related party.		28,191		-

Total notes payable		417,741		360,550

Less: current portion		417,741		360,550

Notes payable, less current portion	$	-	$	-

F-10

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Future maturities of long-term debt are as follows as of December 31, 2010:

2011	$	417,741
2012		-
2013		-
2014		-
Thereafter		-
	$	417,741

Interest expense totaled $148,803 and $151,384 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company is in default of its semi-annual interest payment of $24,000 for 2002 through 2010 (a total of $436,000) and the principal on a note payable of $300,000.

Note 7 – Unearned Rental Revenues

On May 1, 1998, we entered into an agreement with Twin Mountain Rock Venture (“Twin Mountain”) to lease our property located in San Bernardino County, California for a period of ten years. Further, we will make available to Twin Mountain a minimum of 600,000 tons of finished material during the term of the agreement in exchange for a minimum annual royalty payment in the amount of $22,500. The initial agreement expired on April 30, 2008. Twin Mountain elected to utilize the renewal option for an additional ten-year period with an increased minimum annual royalty of $27,500. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had unearned revenue from this agreement totaling $9,167 and $11,458, respectively.

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Mining claims - The Company has a lease and purchase option agreement covering six patented claims in the Cerbat Mountains, Hualapai Mining District and Mohave County Arizona. The Company pays $1,500 per quarter as minimum advance royalties. The Company has the option to purchase the property for $250,000 plus interest at a rate of 8% compounded annually from and after the date of its exercise of the option to purchase the property. If the Lessee exercises its option to purchase, all funds paid to Lessors shall be credited toward the purchase price as of the date the payments were made.

F-11

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9 – Changes in Securities

1996

During 1996 the Company issued 3,441,217 shares of Can-Cal common stock to various investors resulting in cash proceeds of $628,400.

1997

On January 15, 1997 the Company issued 500,000 shares of Can-Cal common stock along with a cash payment of $100,000 in exchange for a 50% interest in S&S Joint Venture. Additionally, the Company agreed to loan the joint venture up to $48,000.

On February 13, 1997 the Board approved the acquisition of Scotmar Industries, Inc. 200,000 shares of Can-Cal common stock were issued in return for all of the issued and outstanding stock of the acquired company.

On October 27, 1997 the Board approved the issuance of 2,181,752 restricted common shares to ARUM, LLC to repay an existing debt of $315,046 and to purchase a property located in San Bernadino County, California, known as the Pisgah property.

During November, 1997 the Board approved the sale of 124,683 restricted common shares to various investors.

During December, 1997 the Board approved the issuance of 42,000 restricted common shares in return for services rendered.

1998

In July, 1998 the Board approved the issuance 122,000 restricted common shares to various investors.

In October, 1998 the Board approved the sale of 172,450 restricted common shares to various investors.

During December, 1998 the Board approved the sale of 263,059 restricted common shares to various investors.

1999

On February 1, 1999, the Board of Directors approved the Sale of 62,500 shares of Can-Cal common stock to a Board member.

On February 8, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 70,000 shares of Can-Cal common stock to a Board member.

On March 1, 1999 the Board approved the issuance of 32,121 shares of Can-Cal common stock in return for services rendered.

On March 15, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 86,000 shares of Can-Cal common stock to various investors.

On March 17, 1999 the Board approved the issuance of 40,000 shares of Can-Cal common stock in return for equipment.

On March 10, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 295,500 shares of Can-Cal common stock to various investors.

On April 1, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 1,000 shares of restricted common stock in return for equipment.

On July 21, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 357,500 shares of common stock to various investors.

On August 24, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 274,000 shares of common stock to various investors.

On September 7, 1999 the Board approved the sale of 20,000 shares of common stock to an investor.

On November 9, 1999 the board approved the issuance of 10,000 shares of common stock to an investor.

F-12

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2000

On February 27, 2000, the Board of Directors approved the sale of 500,000 shares of common stock to three of its directors (all of whom reside in Canada), an offshore trust and another person affiliated with the Company.

On July 3, 2000, the Board of Directors exercised the option to acquire technology related to the extraction and processing of ore and, in accordance with the agreement with the two owners of that technology, issued 200,000 shares of Can-Cal’s common stock to them.

On November 24, 2000, the Company borrowed $300,000 from a lender. As part of the transaction, the Company issued 45,000 shares of its common stock as a loan placement fee and granted the lender an option to purchase up to 300,000 shares of its common stock. On November 24, 2000, the lender exercised its option in full and purchased 300,000 shares of Can-Cal’s common stock.

In July 2000 the Board of Directors authorized the sale of 74,009 shares of its common stock to eight persons, all of whom reside outside the United States. During the third quarter 46,670 shares were sold and the remaining 27,339 shares were sold during the fourth quarter. All of those shares were issued on December 15, 2000.

2001

In September, 2001, the Board of Directors authorized the sale of 20,000 shares of its common stock to an individual.

During October, 2001 the Company signed an Investment Agreement with two funds (Dutchess Private Equities Fund LP and DRH Investment Company LLC) to sell to those funds up to $8,000,000 in common stock of the Company, for a period of three years. In connection with the Investment Agreement, the Company issued 606,059 shares of restricted common stock to Dutchess Fund and its advisor, and to a broker-dealer firm, for services valued at $400,000, to induce those entities to enter into the Investment Agreement and perform services contemplated under such agreement. The Company also issued 37,000 shares of restricted common stock to the attorney for Dutchess Fund.

On November 2, 2001 the Board of Directors approved the sale of 82,888 shares of restricted common stock.

On December 12, 2001 the Board of Directors approved the sale of 40,000 shares of restricted common stock.

2002

On January 8, 2002, we sold 36,000 restricted common shares to three investors (one Canadian resident, and two private companies controlled and owned by Canadian residents) for $12,600 cash ($0.35 per share, representing a discount of approximately 50% from market price). These investors also were issued warrants to purchase 36,000 additional restricted shares, at a price of $0.35 per share; the warrants will expire January 8, 2004.

On February 11, 2002, 10,000 restricted common shares were sold to one investor (a Canadian resident) for $3,500 cash ($0.35 per share, representing a discount of approximately 50% from market price). This investor also was issued warrants to purchase 10,000 additional restricted shares, at a price of $0.35 per share; the warrants will expire February 11, 2004. Complete information about the Company was provided to these investors. These shares and warrants were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act. No commissions were paid.

On January 31, 2002, we issued 309,677 restricted common shares to a lender (First Colony Merchant) for payment of past due and current interest on debt, $119,800. No commissions were paid.

From March 1, 2002 through June 3, 2002, 369,600 restricted common shares were issued to 48 investors (all Canadian residents or companies controlled and owned by Canadian residents) for $92,400 cash ($0.25 per share, representing discounts ranging from 0% to approximately 50% from market prices at the time of issuance). These investors also were issued warrants to purchase 369,600 additional restricted shares, at a price of $0.25 per share; the warrants will expire two years from the date of issuance. No commissions were paid.

F-13

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On June 21, 2002, 40,000 restricted common shares were issued to Financial Communications Corp. for public relations services, valued at approximately $14,000.

From July 1, 2002 through December 24, 2002, 609,720 restricted common shares were issued to 20 investors (19 whom are Canadian residents or companies controlled and owned by Canadian residents, and one who is a resident of Great Britain) for $152,400 cash ($0.25 per share, representing prices that ranged from 22% over market to approximately 40% below market prices at the time of issuance). The investors also were issued warrants to purchase a total of 609,720 additional restricted shares, at a price of $0.25 per share; the warrants will expire two years from the date of issuance. No commissions were paid.

During September 2002, the Company issued 32,281 shares of the Company’s common stock for $5,500 in cash related to the Dutchess Private Equities Fund, net of offering costs of $200, and issued 30,000 shares to Joseph B. LaRocco, attorney for Dutchess Fund and DRH Investment Company, LLC for legal services to such entities.

During October 2002, the Company issued 35,679 shares of the Company’s common stock for $4,600 in cash related to the Dutchess Private Equities Fund, net of offering costs of $700.

In November 2002, the Company issued 52,292 restricted common shares to four individuals in exchange for various services, valued at approximately $9,900.

2003

During 2003, 673,410 restricted common shares were issued to 19 Canadian residents or companies controlled and owned by Canadian resident investors for $134,682 and 150,000 restricted common shares were issued to 12 U.S. resident investors for $30,000 (all shares were priced at $0.20 per share, representing premiums of up to 25% and discounts ranging from 0% to approximately 25% from market prices at the time of issuance). With respect to 237,410 restricted common shares, the investors were also issued warrants to purchase 474,820 additional restricted common shares and with respect to 473,500 restricted common shares, the investors were also issued warrants to purchase 473,500 additional restricted common shares; all warrants were priced at $0.20 per share and will expire two years from the date of issuance. With respect to 112,500 restricted common shares, the investors were also issued 112,500 warrants to purchase additional restricted common shares, at a price of $0.25 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance. The shares and warrants were sold to Canadian investors pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act, and the shares and warrants sold to U.S. investors were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

During 2003, 364,305 restricted common shares were issued in conversion of $35,000 principal and interest on a debenture held by Dutchess Fund. The conversion prices were $0.099 for 50,710 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); $0.112 for 44,643 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); $0.061 for 81,433 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); $0.067 for 75,075 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); and $0.1334 for 112,444 shares ($15,000 of the debenture). All of the prices were determined by the conversion formula in the debenture (80% of the average bid prices for the three lowest (out of 15) trading days before conversion. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

During 2003, 205,166 restricted common shares in payment of $31,500 of services by Luis Vega, consulting geologist. The price per share was determined by dividing the amount owed by the average closing price of the Company’s stock for each day’s service. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

On March 14, 2003, 24,960 restricted common shares were issued to Catherine Nichols, a Canadian resident, for marketing services amounting to $5,000. The price per share was based on the average closing share price for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

During the period from July 15 to December 31, 2003, 112,326 restricted common shares in payment of $22,250 of investor relations services by Jeffrey Whitford, a Canadian resident who is a consultant to the Company. The price per share was based on the average monthly closing share prices for the period. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

33,600 restricted common shares were issued to pay $4,200 of legal services provided by Stephen E. Rounds, outside company counsel. The price per share was based on the average closing share price for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

F-14

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 30, 2003, 5,208 restricted common shares were issued to Terry Brown, a Mexican resident, for technical consulting services amounting to $1,250. The price per share was based on the average closing share price for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

2004

During 2004, 2,255,586 restricted common shares were issued to 107 Canadian residents or companies controlled and owned by Canadian resident investors for $431,425 and 10,000 restricted common shares were issued to one U.S. resident investor for $2,000 (245,000 shares were priced at $0.18 per share, 1,620,131 shares were priced at $0.20 per share, 261,200 shares were priced at $0.25 per share, and 139,255 shares were issued as a 25% premium on the conversion of warrants, representing premiums of up to 25% and discounts ranging from 0% to approximately 25% from market prices at the time of issuance). With respect to 1,319,308 of these restricted common shares, the investors were also issued warrants to purchase 1,259,308 additional restricted common shares at $0.25 per share and 60,000 additional restricted common shares at $0.20 per share. With respect to 245,000 restricted common shares, the investors were also issued warrants to purchase 245,000 additional restricted common shares at $0.25, and with respect to another 245,000 restricted common shares, the investors were also issued warrants to purchase 245,000 additional restricted common shares at $0.50 per share. Of these, we also sold 5,000 shares to a director of the Company for proceeds of $1,000 and issued warrants to purchase 5,000 restricted common shares, exercisable at $0.25 per share for a two year period. All warrants will expire two years from the date of issuance. The shares and warrants were sold to Canadian investors pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act, and the shares and warrants sold to U.S. investors were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

During 2004, 702,760 restricted common shares were issued in conversion of $99,657 principal and interest on a debenture held by Dutchess Fund. The conversion prices were $0.216 for 92,593 shares ($20,000 of the debenture); $0.160 for 31,250 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); $0.144 for 34,722 shares ($5,000 of the debenture); $0.128 for 544,195 shares ($69,657 of the debenture). All of the prices were determined by the conversion formula in the debenture (80% of the average bid prices for the three lowest (out of 15) trading days before conversion). These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

During 2004, 215,336 restricted common shares were issued in payment of $40,932 of services by Luis Vega, consulting geologist. The price per share was determined by dividing the amount owed by the average closing price of the Company’s stock for each day’s service. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

On February 4, 2004, 10,000 restricted common shares were issued to Yvonne St. Pierre, a Canadian resident, for computer-related services, in the amount of $2,500. These shares were issued pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

Between February 10 and March 31, 2004, 75,000 restricted common shares were issued to Jeff Whitford, a Canadian resident, for investor relation services, in the amount of $15,000. In addition, Mr. Whitford received 50,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.20 per share; the warrants will expire between February 2006 and March 2006. The warrants were valued at $12,200 utilizing the Black Scholes model. These shares were issued pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

On December 22, 2004, 2,500 restricted common shares were issued to Karen Barra, a U.S. resident, for services amounting to $500. The price per share was $0.20 based on private placement offering for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

During 2004, 15,367 restricted common shares were issued in payment of accounts payable amounting to $3,842. The price per share was based on the average closing share price for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

During 2004, 87,388 restricted common shares were issued to Terry Brown, a Mexican resident, for technical consulting services amounting to $15,247. The price per share was based on the average closing share price for the period during which the services were rendered. These shares were sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S of the 1933 Act.

On March 1, 2004, in connection with the conversion of $82,687 in notes payable and $225,595 in accrued officers’ salary payable, we issued 1,233,127 restricted common shares at $0.25 per share and 1,233,127 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.30 and expiring on March 1, 2006, to two officers, two directors, and a former director and his insurance agency. These persons and the insurance agency are accredited investors.

F-15

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2005

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, we sold 712,500 restricted common shares to 21 Canadian residents for a total of $142,500, and issued warrants to purchase 712,500 restricted common shares, exercisable at $0.25 per share. These securities were issued in private transactions in reliance on the exemption from registration with the SEC provided by Regulation S.

A prior U.S. shareholder exercised other warrants, at exercise prices ranging from $0.22, for proceeds of $11,000, which resulted in the issuance of 50,000 restricted common shares. These securities were issued in private transactions in reliance on the exemption available under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

We also issued, for services, 349,545 restricted common shares for a total value of $69,800 valued at fair market value at date of issuance and granted 13,575 warrants (exercisable for two years at $0.25 per share) valued at fair market value at date of issuance. These securities were issued to two Canadian residents, and one Mexican Corporation in reliance on the exemption from registration available under Regulation S, and one U.S. resident, in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

2006

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, we sold 2,622,213 restricted common shares to 76 Canadian residents, 8 US residents, 5 Israeli Nationals and 1 Swiss National for a total of $688,000, and issued warrants to purchase 2,348,213 restricted common shares, exercisable between $0.25 to $.45 per share. These securities were issued in private transactions, with respect to the Canadian residents, in reliance on the exemption from registration with the SEC provided by Regulation S, and with respect to the U.S. citizen, in reliance on the exemption available under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

We also issued, for services, 8,500 restricted common shares for a total value of $2,325 and these securities were issued to one U.S. resident in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

On July 3, 2006, the Company issued 2,200 shares of its par value common stock for services received by an individual. As of September 30, 2006, the Company recorded consulting expense in the amount of $462, the fair value of the shares issued on the date of grant. Additionally, the Company granted a warrant to purchase 2,200 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 for a period of 2 years. The Company recorded an expense in the amount of $373, the fair value of the warrant on the date of grant. Fair value was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividends: $-0-; volatility: 187%; risk free interest rate: 5.12%.

On July 3, 2006, the Company issued 8,800 shares of its par value common stock for services received from an individual. As of September 30, 2006, the Company recorded consulting expense in the amount of $2,200, the fair value of the shares issued on the date of grant. Additionally, the Company granted a warrant to purchase up to 8,800 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 for a period of 2 years. The Company recorded an expense in the amount of $1,812, the fair value of the warrant on the date of grant. Fair value was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividends: $-0-; volatility: 187%; risk free interest rate: 5.12%.

On July 3, 2006, an officer of the Company elected to convert half of his accrued salary in exchange for 385,714 shares of common stock valued at $81,000, the fair value of the shares issued on the date of grant. Additionally, the Company granted a warrant to purchase up to 385,714 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 for a period of two years. The Company recorded an expense in the amount of $65,418, the fair value of the warrant on the date of grant. Fair value was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividends: $-0-; volatility: 187%; risk free interest rate: 5.12%.

On July 3, 2006, the Company issued 56,821 shares of its common stock for conversion of a note in the amount of $11,932 from a shareholder of the Company. Additionally, the Company granted a warrant to purchase up to 56,821 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 for a period of two years. The Company recorded an expense in the amount of $9,637, the fair value of the warrant on the date of grant. Fair value was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected dividends: $-0-; volatility: 187%; risk free interest rate: 5.12%.

F-16

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On July 11, 2006, the Company issued 206,767 shares of its par value common stock pursuant to the convertible debenture agreement entered into on January 24, 2006 whereby the Company received a $40,000 convertible at a rate of $0.20 per share bearing interest of 10% per annum. The note holder elected to convert all accrued interest totaling $1,895 into 6,767 shares of the Company’s par value common stock.

On August 22, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s par value common stock. The Company recorded an asset totaling $400,000, the fair value of the underlying shares.

2007

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, we sold 1,238,167 restricted common shares to 72 Canadian residents and 4 US residents for a total of $375,534 and issued warrants to purchase 492,795 restricted common shares, exercisable between $0.35 and $.65 per share. These securities were issued in private transactions, with respect to the Canadian residents, in reliance on the exemption from registration with the SEC provided by Regulation S, and with respect to the U.S. citizen, in reliance on the exemption available under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

On April 30, 2007, the Company also issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock as part of a settlement agreement with a former officer of the Company for compensation of accrued salaries. The common stock was rendered to a U.S. citizen, in reliance on the exemption available under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. The shares were valued at a total of $22,000. In addition to monthly cash payments of $3,500 per month the Company has recorded debt forgiveness of $147,419 in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement. Due to the related party nature of the transaction the gain has been recorded to additional paid in capital, therefore there has been no impact on the Company’s net loss.

On June 29, 2007, the Company also issued 4,000 shares of restricted common stock for services rendered to a U.S. citizen, in reliance on the exemption available under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. The shares were valued at a total of $2,000.

2008

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 32,500 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 32,500 shares common stock for cash totaling $8,124. The warrants are fully vested upon grant, expire in two years and have an exercise price of $0.35 per share.

2009

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 2,926,600 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering whereby each recipient received one share of common stock and one warrant certificate for a unit price of $0.125. The Company recorded proceeds from the offering of $340,825 and a subscription receivable in the amount of $25,000, subsequently paid in January 2010.

On June 30, 2009, certain note holders elected to convert the principal balance of their notes together with accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.125 per share. In addition, the Company agreed to issue a warrant to purchase two shares of the Company’s common stock for each share converted. The total principal balance converted was $369,500 and was converted into 2,956,000 common shares. Total accrued interest converted was $29,093 or 232,741 common shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued a total of 107,000 shares of its restricted common stock to individuals for services rendered to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, the Company recorded an expense of $14,260 representing the fair value of the grant.

On December 31, 2009, the Company authorized the issuance of 9,000 and 6,000 shares of its restricted common stock to a director and officer of the Company, respectively for services performed for the Company. As of December 31, 2009, we recorded an expense of $1,200, representing the fair value of the issuance on the date of grant.

F-17

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2010

On January 20, 2010, the Company issued 40,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The warrants are exercisable over fifteen months at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

On January 20, 2010, the Company received $25,000 in payment on a subscription receivable outstanding at December 31, 2009.

On March 17, 2010, the Company received $12,125 in payment on a rescission receivable outstanding at December 31, 2009.

On December 31, 2010, the Company cancelled 26,993 previously granted shares to related parties.

On December 31, 2010, the Company converted $128,800 of previously issued convertible debentures to a total of nine investors in exchange for a total of 2,146,666 shares, at $0.06 per share, and a total of 2,146,666 warrants exercisable at $0.08 per share over a two year term, that were not issued until January 5, 2011. The shares were presented as a subscription payable of $128,800 at December 31, 2010. A total of $3,598 of accrued interest was forgiven by the note holders, as presented in other income. The total estimated value of the warrants granted as an inducement for conversion using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model, based on a volatility rate of 179% and a call option value of $0.0347, was $74,403, as presented in the income statement as interest expense.

Finders acting in connection with the conversion are entitled to receive aggregate fees of $2,790 and 46,500 shares of common stock. The fair market value of the common stock payable based on the closing stock price at the grant date was $2,790.

Note 10 – Options and Warrants

Options

Options granted for employee and consulting services - The 2003 Non-Qualified Option Plan was established by the Board of Directors in June 2003 and approved by shareholders in October 2003. A total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under this plan.

In June 2006, the Company granted options to buy 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 with terms ranging from two to five years from the date of issuance to the Directors of the Company, of these options, 250,000 expired in June 2008. Additionally, the Company granted options to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 with a term of three years from the date of issuance to an unrelated consultant. On June 19, 2006, the consultant exercised 100,000 options in exchange for cash of $20,000. In June of 2009, the remaining 150,000 options expired.

In accordance with ASC 505, “Share-Based Payment”; the Company recognized the fair value of the options in the statement of operations on the date of grant. The following is a summary of information about the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010.

Shares Underlying

Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Range of

Underlying

Remaining

Average

Underlying

Average

Exercise

Options

Contractual

Exercise

Options

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

$0.16 – $0.20

1,000,000

1.59 years

$0.18

1,000,000

$0.18

F-18

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The fair value of each option and warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

	December 31,			December 31
	2010			2009

Average risk-free interest rates		1.02	%		4.97	%
Average expected life (in years)		1.0			7.5
Volatility		179	%		86	%

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. During 2010 and 2009, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

There were no options issued during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s option activity related to employees and consultants:

	Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance, January 1, 2009		1,150,000	$	0.18
Granted		-		-
Cancelled		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Expired		150,000		0.20
Balance, December 31, 2009		1,000,000		0.18
Granted		-		-
Cancelled		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Expired		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2010		1,000,000	$	0.18

Warrants

On January 22, 2010, the Company granted 40,000 stock warrants with an exercise price of $0.15 per share for its common stock. These stock warrants were granted in connection with financing activities relating to stock sold on January 22, 2010. These warrants were exercisable upon issuance and expire on March 31, 2011.

On December 31, 2010, the Company granted 2,146,666 stock warrants with an exercise price of $0.08 per share for its common stock. These stock warrants were granted in connection with the conversion of $128,800 of previously issued convertible debentures on December 31, 2010 to a total of nine investors in exchange for a total of 2,146,666 shares. These warrants were exercisable upon issuance and expire on December 31, 2012.

A total of 2,129,812 warrants expired during the year ended December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes the Company’s warrant activities:

F-19

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following is a summary of information about the common stock warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010:

				Shares Underlying
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
		Weighted
	Shares	Average	Weighted	Shares	Weighted
Range of	Underlying	Remaining	Average	Underlying	Average
Exercise	Options	Contractual	Exercise	Options	Exercise
Prices	Outstanding	Life	Price	Exercisable	Price

$0.08 – $0.15	9,588,162	0.79 years	$0.13	9,588,162	$0.13

The following is a summary of the common stock warrant activity as of December 31, 2010.

	Warrants Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance, January 1, 2009		525,295		$	0.50
Granted		9,304,096			0.15
Cancelled		(492,795	)		0.61
Exercised		-			-
Expired		-			0.20
Balance, December 31, 2009		9,336,596			0.15
Granted		2,186,666			0.085
Cancelled		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Expired		(1,935,100	)		0.17
Balance, September 30, 2010		9,588,162		$	0.13

Note 12 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company incurred a net operating loss and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. The Company had approximately $8,266,900 and $7,817,000 of federal net operating losses at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2029.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	2,893,415		$	2,536,476
Stock-based compensation		-			5,411
Asset impairment		-			1,100
Total deferred tax assets:		2,893,415			2,542,987
Less: Valuation allowance		(2,893,415	)		(2,542,987	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

F-20

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of its loss, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009

Federal and state statutory rate		35	%		35	%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(35	%)		(35	%)

In accordance with FASB ASC 740, the Company has evaluated its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

On January 4, 2011, the Company issued 680,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $40,800. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On January 4, 2011, the Company issued 170,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $10,200. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On January 5, 2011, the Company issued 2,146,666 shares for the subscription payable pursuant to the $128,800 of previously converted debentures.

On January 26, 2011, the Company issued 85,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,100. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On February 25, 2011, the Company issued 170,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $10,200. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On March 16, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $6,000. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On March 16, 2011, the Company issued 85,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,100. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On March 16, 2011, the Company issued 170,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $10,200. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On March 16, 2011, the Company issued 343,334 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $20,600. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On April 1, 2011, the Company issued 85,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,100. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

On April 1, 2011, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $9,000. The warrants are exercisable over two years at an exercise price of $0.08 per share.

In accordance with ASC 855, all subsequent events have been reported through the filing date.

F-21

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our President has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the identification of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which is identified below, which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control

We have also evaluated our internal control over financial reporting, and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls as of December 31, 2010.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

CEO and CFO Certifications

Appearing immediately following the Signatures section of this report there are Certifications of the CEO and the CFO. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

The management of the Company assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on this assessment, management determined that, during the year ended December 31, 2010, our internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules, as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies in the design or operation of the Company’s internal control that adversely affected the Company’s internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

Management identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:

1. The Company has limited segregation of duties, which is not consistent with good internal control procedures.

2. The Company does not have a written internal control procedurals manual which outlines the duties and reporting requirements of the Directors and any staff to be hired in the future. This lack of a written internal control procedurals manual does not meet the requirements of the SEC or good internal controls.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items 1 and 2 above did not have an affect on the Company’s financial results.

The Company and its management will endeavor to correct the above noted weaknesses in internal control once it has adequate funds to do so.

Management will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and procedures and its internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only the management’s report in this annual report.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Officers and directors of the Company are listed below. Directors are elected to hold offices until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified. Officers are appointed by the board of directors until a successor is elected and qualified or until resignation, removal or death.

Name	Age	Position and Tenure

G. Michael Hogan	72	President and Chief Executive Officer since November 17, 2009, and a Director.

William J. Hogan	61	Secretary and a Director since July 31, 2009

G. MICHAEL HOGAN. Mr. G. Michael Hogan spent the majority of his career in various senior management positions at Texaco Canada Ltd and Imperial Oil Ltd. He began his career as an Industrial/Lubrication Engineer for Texaco Canada. Shortly thereafter, he was promoted to District Supervisor making him the youngest supervisor in the company. After graduating with a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto, Ontario and an MBA in Finance from the University of Western Ontario in 1971, he returned to Texaco as the Assistant Manager in Strategic Planning at the corporate office of Texaco Canada. After several promotions, he was appointed Manager of Budgets and Long Range Strategic Planning, where he managed the team that computerized the budget and planning process. Prior to the merger with Imperial Oil, he served on the Corporate M&A team for two years. After the merger with Imperial Oil, he served as the Manager of Retail Pricing.

Mr. Hogan joined Equion Securities in 1991, as a Financial Advisor (FA) serving high net worth individual investors. After joining Equion, the company merged with Loring Ward and the combined company changed its name to Assante Corp. Assante then grew by purchasing 15 Independent Financial Advisory firms. Subsequently, Assante was purchased by CI Financial, during the second half of 2003, for approximately $900 million.

Mr. Hogan sold his prosperous FA practice in 2004, and went into semi-retirement and ultimately into full retirement in 2007. Mr. G. Michael Hogan has a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto, Ontario and an MBA in Finance from the University of Western Ontario.

WILLIAM J. HOGAN. Mr. Hogan specializes in business development and has a track record of adding shareholder value to his endeavors in both the public and private sectors, with over 33 years experience in the areas of development, operations, fund raising and strategic planning for startup and growth level companies. Mr. Hogan currently holds the position of Vice Chairman, Founder of Vacci-Test Corporation, a Calgary, Alberta developing food safety pathogen testing company.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We currently have two directors. Our chairman of the board of directors, William J. Hogan, currently receives annual compensation in the amount of $60,000 to be paid in a combination of cash and restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The board can approve to award the compensation in a combination of cash or common stock as agreed upon to be computed utilizing the trading price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) on the last trading day of each month. In the past, the Company has not compensated outside (non-employee) directors for service but has reimbursed them for travel costs to attend Board meetings. In the future, the Board of Directors may issue non- qualified options to non-executive directors. The terms of such options to be granted have not yet been established.

Our other director, Mr. G. Michael Hogan, who also acts as CEO and President, receives compensation for acting as CEO in the amount of $120,000 annually. The board can approve to award the compensation in a combination of cash or common stock as agreed upon to be computed utilizing the trading price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) on the last trading day of each month.

William J. Hogan’s and G. Michael Hogan’s salaries for 2010 were accrued, but not paid.

(b) Identification of Certain Significant Employees and Consultants

None.

Not applicable.

(d) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.

During the past five years, no director, person nominated to become a director, or executive officer of the Company:

(1) has filed or had filed against him, a petition under the federal bankruptcy law or any state insolvency law, nor has any court appointed a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer by or against any business of which such person was a general partner, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing;

(2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is the named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

(3) was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring or suspending him from, or otherwise limiting his involvement in, any type of business, securities or banking activities, or

(4) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 furnished to the company pursuant to Rule 16a-3(a) and written representations referred to in Item 405(b) (2)(i) of Regulation S-K, no directors, officers, beneficial owners of more than 10% of the company’s common stock, or any other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act failed for the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 to file on a timely basis the reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided to any person, without charge, upon written request addressed to Ronald D. Sloan, President/Chairman, 2500 Vista Mar Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89128.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth summary compensation information for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for our chief executive officer’s and directors, who we refer to throughout this report as former executive officer. We did not have any other executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)			Bonus ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
G Michael Hogan	2010	$	120,000	(1)	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	120,000
President, CEO, Director	2009	$	--		$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--

William J. Hogan	2010	$	60,000	(1)	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	60,000
Secretary, Chairman	2009	$	--		$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--

Ronald D. Sloan	2010	$	--		$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--
Former President, CEO	2009	$	110,000	(2)	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	110,000

(1)	Accrued but not paid.

(2)	Former Chief Executive Officer/President. From April 2006 to present accrued at the rate of $10,000 per month. As of December 31, 2009, Mr. Sloan was owed $211,689. Mr. Sloan resigned in 2009.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010

We did not grant any plan-based awards to our named executive officer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Fiscal Year-End

The following table lists the outstanding equity incentive awards held by our named executive officer as of December 31, 2010.

	Option Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Un-exercisable	Option Exercise Price	Option Expiration Date

Ronald D. Sloan	500,000	-	$1.00	12/31/11

Option Exercises for 2010

There were no options issued or exercised by our former executive officer in fiscal 2010.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table presents information, to the best of Can-Cal’s knowledge, about the ownership of Can-Cal’s common stock on December 31, 2010 relating to those persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of Can-Cal’s capital stock and by Can-Cal’s directors and executive officers. The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following table is based on 30,711,203 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the shareholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes shares of common stock that the shareholder has a right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2010 pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other right. The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of Can-Cal’s common stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner, Officer or Director(1)	Number of Shares			Percent of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock(2)
G. Michael Hogan, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (3)		2,513,635	(4)		8.2	%

William J. Hogan, Director(3)		1,020,656	(5)		3.3	%

Ronald D. Sloan, former Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (3)		1,760,785	(6)		5.7	%

Directors, Officers and Beneficial Owners as a Group		5,295,076			17.2	%

(1)	As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security).

(2)	Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.

(3)	The address of each person is care of Can-Cal: 2500 Vista Mar Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89128.

(4)	Excludes warrants to purchase an additional 2,439,920 shares.

(5)	Excludes warrants to purchase an additional 1,381,312 shares.

(6)	Excludes options to purchase an additional 500,000 shares, and warrants to purchase an additional 348,320 shares.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2010 regarding outstanding options granted under the plans, warrants issued to consultants and options reserved for future grant under the plan.

Plan Category	Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares reflected in column (a)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		900,000	$	0.20		600,000

2003 Qualified ISOP (1,500,000 shares)		--		--		1,500,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		--		--		--

Total		900,000	$	0.20		2,100,000

Total shares underlying unexercised options (both plans) cannot exceed 10% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock, calculated on a pro forma basis.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Can-Cal was not a party to any transactions or series of similar transactions that have occurred during fiscal 2010 in which:

	•	The amounts involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years ($3,631); and
	•	A director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(5)(i) The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee. However, the Board of Directors, as a group, carries out the responsibilities, which an audit committee would have. In this respect the Board of Directors has the responsibility of reviewing our financial statements, exercising general oversight of the integrity and reliability of our accounting and financial reporting practices, and monitoring the effectiveness of our internal control systems. The Board of Directors also recommends selection of the auditing firm and exercises general oversight of the activities of our independent auditors, principal financial and accounting officers and employees and related matters.

The Board of Directors delegates to management of Mr. G. Michael Hogan and the Board of Directors, the terms of engagement, before we engage independent auditor for audit and non-audit services, except as to engagements for services outside the scope of the original terms, in which instances the services have been provided pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures, established by management. These pre-approval policies and procedures are detailed as to the category of service and the Board of Directors is kept informed of each service provided.

(7) L.L. Bradford & Company was retained as our auditing firm by the Board of Directors for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. L.L. Bradford & Company billed us as follows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:

	For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Audit Fees (a)		$	24,000		$	23,500
Audit-Related Fees (b)			-0-			-0-
Tax Fees (c)			-0-			-0-
All Other Fees (d)			750			755
Total fees paid or accrued to our principal accountants		$	24,750		$	24,255

(a)

Includes fees for audit of the annual financial statements and review of quarterly financial information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(b)

For assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements, which are not included in the Audit Fees category. The Company had no Audit-Related Fees for the periods ended December 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

(c)

For tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning services, relating to any and all federal and state tax returns as necessary for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(d)

For services in respect of any and all other reports as required by the SEC and other governing agencies.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report:

(a) 1. Financial Statements

	Page
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		34
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Balance Sheets		F-2
Statements of Operations		F-3
Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit)		F-4
Statements of Cash Flows		F-5
Notes to Financial Statements		F-6

(b) 2. Financial Statement Schedules

None.

Incorporated by reference

Exhibit

Exhibit Description

Filed herewith

Form

Period ending

Exhibit

Filing date

31.1

Certification of G. Michael Hogan pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2

Certification of G. Michael Hogan pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.1

Certification of G. Michael Hogan pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

99.1

Summary of Significant Details Regarding Pigsah, Wikeiup, Cerbat and the Owl Canyon Properties

10-KSB/A

12/31/07

99.1

03/11/09

99.2

Press Release dated April 28, 2009

8-K

04/29/09

99.3

Press Release dated May 28, 2009

8-K

06/03/09

99.4

Press Release dated July 31, 2009

8-K

08/11/09

99.5

Press Release dated November 13, 2009

8-K

11/17/09

99.6

Press Release dated November 17, 2009

8-K

11/17/09

99.7

Press Release dated February 19, 2010

8-K

02/25/10

99.8

Press Release dated January 4, 2011

8-K

01/04/11

99.9

Press Release dated February 23, 2011

8-K

03/03/11

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD.

By:	/s/ G. Michael Hogan
	G. Michael Hogan, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 15, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated have signed this report below.

Name	Title	Date

/s/ G. Michael Hogan	Chief Executive Officer, President & Director	April 15, 2011
G. Michael Hogan	(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ William J Hogan	Director	April 15, 2011
William J. Hogan

Attached files

CAN CAL RESOURCES LTD Reports

Also read