UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-49885

 

Kirkland’s, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tennessee		62-1287151
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)
2501 McGavock Pike, Suite 1000, Nashville, TN		37214
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Title of each class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, no par value per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes þ No

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No

     Note — Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes þ No

     The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2010 the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $289,525,000 based on the last sale price of the common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market.

     As of April 4, 2011, there were 19,917,819 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

     Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Kirkland’s, Inc. to be held June 1, 2011, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-K

		Page
Forward-Looking Statements			3
PART I
Item 1. Business			4
Item 1A. Risk Factors			11
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			16
Item 2. Properties			16
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			17
Item 4. Reserved			17
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			18
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			19
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			20
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk			29
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			29
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			29
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			29
Item 9B. Other Information			30
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance			31
Item 11. Executive Compensation			31
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			31
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			31
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			31
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			32
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			33
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010			35
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			36
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			37
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			39
Exhibits			48
Signatures			49
Index of Exhibits Filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K			50
EX-23.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be found throughout this Form 10-K, particularly under the headings “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” among others. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. You should consider statements that contain these words carefully because they describe our expectations, plans, strategies and goals and our beliefs concerning future business conditions, our results of operations, financial position and our business outlook or state other “forward-looking” information based on currently available information. The factors listed below under the heading “Risk Factors” and in the other sections of this Form 10-K provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements.

     The forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

     The terms “Kirkland’s,” “we,” “us,” and “our” as used in this Form 10-K refer to Kirkland’s, Inc.

PART I

Item 1.		Business

General

     We are a specialty retailer of home décor and gifts in the United States, operating 300 stores in 30 states as of January 29, 2011. Our stores present a broad selection of distinctive merchandise, including framed art, mirrors, wall décor, candles and related items, lamps, decorative accessories, accent furniture, textiles, garden-related accessories and artificial floral products. Our stores also offer an extensive assortment of holiday merchandise during seasonal periods as well as items carried throughout the year suitable for gift-giving. In addition, we use innovative design and packaging to market home décor items as gifts. We provide our predominantly female customers an engaging shopping experience characterized by a diverse, ever-changing merchandise selection at prices which provide discernable value to the customer. Our stores offer a unique combination of style and value that has led to our emergence as a leader in home décor and has enabled us to develop a strong customer franchise.

Business Strategy

     Our goal is to be one of the leading specialty retailers of home décor in each of our markets. We believe the following elements of our business strategy both differentiate us from our competitors and position us for growth:

     Item-focused merchandising. While our stores contain items covering a broad range of complementary product categories, we emphasize traditionally-styled, high quality and fashionable key items within our targeted categories rather than merchandising complete, themed product classifications. Our buyers work closely with our vendors to identify and develop stylish merchandise that appeals to a broad base of customers while reflecting the latest trends. We test-market products where appropriate and monitor individual item sales, which enables us to identify and quickly reorder bestselling items in order to maximize sales. We constantly evaluate market trends and merchandise sales data and work with vendors to develop new products to be sold in our stores, frequently on an exclusive basis. In most cases, this exclusive merchandise is the result of our buying team’s experience in interpreting market and merchandise trends in a way that appeals to our customers.

     Ever-changing merchandise mix. We believe our ever-changing merchandise mix and method of display create an exciting “treasure hunt” environment, encouraging strong customer loyalty and frequent return visits to our stores. The merchandise in our stores is traditionally-styled for broad market appeal, yet it reflects an understanding of our customer’s desire for fashion and novelty. Our information systems permit close tracking of individual item sales, enabling us to react quickly to both fast-selling and slow-moving items. Accordingly, our inventory turns rapidly and we actively change our merchandise throughout the year in response to market trends, sales results and changes in seasons. We also strategically increase selling space devoted to gifts and seasonal merchandise in advance of holidays.

     Stimulating visual presentation. Through our marketing and in-store presentation, we seek to help customers visualize our merchandise in their own homes and inspire decorating and gift-giving ideas. We creatively group complementary merchandise throughout the store. We believe this cross-category merchandising encourages customers to browse for longer periods of time, promoting add-on sales. We adjust our visual presentation frequently to take advantage of sales trends and enhance our ever-changing merchandise mix.

     Strong value proposition. Our customers regularly experience the satisfaction of paying noticeably less for items similar to those sold by other retail stores or through other retail channels. This strategy of providing a unique combination of style, quality and value is an important element in making Kirkland’s a destination store. While we carry some items in our stores that sell for several hundred dollars, most items sell for under $20 and are perceived by our customers as very affordable home décor and gifts. Our longstanding relationships with vendors and our ability to place and sell-through large orders of a single item enhance our ability to attain favorable product pricing from vendors.

     Broad market appeal. Our stores operate successfully across different geographic regions and market sizes. As of January 29, 2011, we operated stores in 30 states. Although originally focused in the Southeast, approximately 54% of our stores are now located outside that region. The flexibility of our concept enables us to select the most promising real estate opportunities that meet requisite economic and demographic criteria within the target markets where our customers live and shop. In November 2010, we launched a new and improved website providing for direct-to-customer selling at www.kirklands.com. We view this new channel as an important part of our business strategy, allowing us to introduce our concept to new customers and complement our “brick-and-mortar” business.

     Opening new stores. We returned to net store growth during fiscal 2010, ending the year with 300 stores versus 279 stores at the end of fiscal 2009. Our approach to new store growth in fiscal 2011 will continue to focus on replacements of successful mall and smaller-sized off-mall stores with new, larger off-mall locations that have proved to produce higher sales. Additionally,

we expect to open stores in existing, underpenetrated markets and selected new geographical markets. During fiscal 2011, we expect to open a total of 40 to 45 stores, and expect to close approximately 15 to 20 stores. Many of these expected closings are currently in markets where we are pursuing or have identified a relocation opportunity. Fiscal 2011 new store openings will be weighted toward the back half of the year while store closings for fiscal 2011 are expected to occur at fairly regular intervals over the course of the entire fiscal year.

Merchandising

     Merchandising strategy. Our merchandising strategy is to (i) offer unique, distinctive and often exclusive, high quality home décor and gifts at affordable prices representing great value to our customers, (ii) maintain a breadth of productive merchandise categories, (iii) provide a carefully edited selection of key items within targeted categories, rather than merchandising complete, themed product classifications, (iv) emphasize new and fresh-to-market merchandise by continually updating our merchandise mix, and (v) present merchandise in a visually appealing manner to create an inviting atmosphere which inspires decorating and gift-giving ideas and encourages frequent store visits.

     Our information systems permit close tracking of individual item sales, which enables us to react quickly to market trends and best or slow sellers. This daily sales and gross margin information helps us to maximize the productivity of successful products and categories, and minimize the accumulation of slow-moving inventory. Our core merchandise assortment is relatively consistent across the chain. We address regional differences by tailoring inventories to geographic considerations and specific store sales results in selected categories.

     We continuously introduce new and often exclusive products to our merchandise assortment in order to (i) maintain customer interest due to the freshness of our product selections, encouraging frequent return visits to our stores, (ii) enhance our reputation as a source for identifying or developing high quality, fashionable products, and (iii) allow merchandise which has peaked in sales to be quickly discontinued and replaced by new items. In addition, we strategically increase selling space devoted to gifts and holiday merchandise during the third and fourth quarters of the calendar year. Our flexible store design and display fixtures allow us to adjust our selling space as needed to capitalize on sales trends.

     Our average store generally carries approximately 4,000-5,000 Stock Keeping Units (“SKUs”). We regularly monitor the sell-through on each item, and therefore, the number and make-up of our active SKUs is continuously changing based on changes in selling trends. New and different SKUs are introduced to our stores constantly.

     We purchase merchandise from approximately 200 vendors, and our buying team works closely with vendors to differentiate Kirkland’s merchandise from that of our competitors. For products that are not manufactured specifically for Kirkland’s, we may create custom packaging as a way to differentiate our merchandise offering and reinforce our brand. Exclusive or proprietary products distinguish us from our competition, enhance the value of our merchandise and provide the opportunity to improve our net sales and gross margin. Our strategy is to continue to increase the amount of exclusive and proprietary products within our merchandise mix.

     Product assortment. Our major merchandise categories include wall décor (framed art, mirrors, metal and other wall ornaments), lamps, decorative accessories, accent furniture, candles and related items, textiles, garden-related accessories, and artificial floral products. Our stores also offer an extensive assortment of holiday merchandise, as well as items carried throughout the year suitable for gift-giving. Consistent with our item-focused strategy, a vital part of the product mix is a variety of home décor and other assorted merchandise that does not necessarily fit into a specific product category. Decorative accessories consist of such varied products as vases and clocks. Throughout the year and especially during the fourth quarter of the calendar year, our buying team uses its experience in home décor to develop products that are equally appropriate for gift-giving.

     The following table presents the percentage of net sales contributed by our major merchandise categories over the last three fiscal years:

		% of Net Sales
Merchandise Category		Fiscal 2010				Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2008
Wall Décor (including framed art, mirrors, metal and other wall ornaments)			30	%			31	%			32	%
Decorative Accessories			13				14				13
Candles and Accessories			9				9				11
Accent Furniture			9				9				9
Holiday			7				7				7
Lamps			7				7				8
Gifts			7				6				4
Frames			6				6				4
Textiles			5				5				5
Floral			4				4				4

		% of Net Sales
Merchandise Category		Fiscal 2010				Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2008
Garden			3				2				3
Total			100	%			100	%			100	%

     Value to customer. We continually strive to increase the perceived value of Kirkland’s products to our customers through our distinctive merchandising, carefully coordinated in-store signage, visual presentation and product packaging. Our shoppers regularly experience the satisfaction of paying noticeably less for items similar to those sold by other retail stores, through catalogs, or on the Internet. Our stores typically have two major semi-annual sale events, one in January and one in July. We also use temporary promotions throughout the year featuring specific items or categories of merchandise. We believe our value-oriented pricing strategy, coupled with an adherence to high quality standards, is an important element in establishing our distinct brand identity and solidifying our connection with our customers.

Buying and Inventory Management

     Merchandise sourcing and product development. Our merchandise team purchases inventory on a centralized basis to take advantage of our consolidated buying power and our technology to closely control the merchandise mix in our stores. Our buying team selects all of our products, negotiates with vendors and works closely with our planning and allocation team to optimize store-level merchandise quantity and mix by category, classification and item.

     We purchase merchandise from approximately 200 vendors. Approximately 95% of our total purchases are from importers of merchandise manufactured primarily in China, with the balance purchased from domestic manufacturers and wholesalers. For our purchases of merchandise manufactured abroad, we have historically bought from importers or U.S.-based representatives of foreign manufacturers rather than dealing directly with foreign manufacturers. This process has enabled us to maximize flexibility and minimize product liability and credit risks. As we execute our growth strategy, we are continually evaluating the best ways to source and differentiate our merchandise while attaining our sales and gross margin objectives. For certain categories and items, the strategic use of domestic manufacturers and wholesalers enables us to reduce the lead times between ordering products and presenting them for sale in our stores.

     Planning and allocation. Our merchandise planning and allocation team works closely with our buying team, field management and store personnel to meet the requirements of individual stores for appropriate merchandise in sufficient quantities. This team also manages inventory levels, allocates merchandise to stores and replenishes inventory based upon information generated by our information systems. Our inventory control systems monitor current inventory levels at each store, by operating district, and for the total company. We also continually monitor recent selling history within each store by category, classification and item to properly allocate future purchases to maximize sales and gross margin.

     Each of our stores is internally classified for merchandising purposes based on certain criteria including sales volume, size, location and historical performance. Although all of our stores carry similar merchandise, the variety and depth of products in a given store may vary depending on the store’s rank and classification. Where applicable, inventory purchases and allocation are also tailored based on regional or demographic differences between stores in selected categories.

Store Operations

     General. As of January 29, 2011, we operated 300 stores in 30 states, with stores operating seven days a week. In addition to corporate management and two Zone Vice Presidents, approximately 20 District Managers (who generally have responsibility for approximately 12-18 stores within a geographic district) manage store operations. A Store Manager and one to three Assistant Store Managers manage individual stores. The Store Manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the store, including sales, guest service, merchandise display, human resource functions and store security. A typical store operates with an average of eight to 10 employees including a full or part-time stock person and a combination of full and part-time employees, depending on the volume of the store and the season. Additional part-time employees are typically hired to assist with increased traffic and sales volume in the fourth quarter of the calendar year.

     Formats. We operate stores in enclosed malls and a variety of off-mall venues. As of January 29, 2011, we operated 59 stores in enclosed malls and 241 stores in off-mall venues including “lifestyle” centers, “power” strip centers, outlet centers and freestanding locations. Off-mall stores are generally larger than mall stores and tend to have a lower occupancy cost per square foot. The average size of our mall stores was approximately 4,800 square feet, and the average size of our off-mall stores was approximately 6,800 square feet. The average size of the new stores we opened in fiscal 2010 was approximately 8,400 square feet, and we currently expect our fiscal 2011 new stores to be of similar average size.

     Visual merchandising. Merchandise is generally displayed according to guidelines and directives given to each store from the Visual Merchandising and Marketing teams with input from Store Operations. This procedure promotes somewhat uniform display standards throughout the chain depending upon store configuration. Using multiple types of fixtures, we group complementary

merchandise creatively throughout the store, and also display certain products strictly by category or product type.

     Because of the nature of our merchandise and our focus on identifying and developing best-selling items, we emphasize our visual merchandising standards. Our Visual Merchandising and Marketing teams provide Store Managers with recommended directives such as photographs, diagrams and placement guides. Augmenting this centralized approach, each Store Manager has flexibility to creatively highlight those products that are expected to have the greatest appeal to local shoppers. Effective and consistent visual merchandising enhances a store’s ability to reach its full sales potential.

     Personnel recruitment and training. We believe our continued success is dependent in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate quality employees. In particular, the success of our growth strategy depends on our ability to promote and/or recruit qualified District and Store Managers and maintain quality full- and part-time sales associates. A multi-week training program is provided for new District Managers and Store Managers. Many Store Managers begin their Kirkland’s career as sales associates, but complete a formal three week training program before taking responsibility for a store. This three week training program includes two weeks in a designated “training store,” working directly with a qualified Training Store Manager. District Managers are primarily responsible for recruiting new Store Managers. Store Managers are responsible for the hiring and training of new associates, assisted where appropriate by a Human Resources Manager. We constantly look for motivated and talented people to promote from within Kirkland’s, in addition to recruiting outside Kirkland’s.

     Compensation and incentives. District and Store Managers are compensated with a base salary or on an hourly basis, plus a monthly sales bonus combined with a quarterly performance bonus based on store-level profit contribution. Sales associates are compensated on an hourly basis. In addition, we periodically run a variety of contests that reward associates for outstanding achievement in sales and other corporate initiatives.

Real Estate

     Strategy. Our real estate strategy is to identify dominant retail properties that are convenient and attractive to our target female customer. The flexibility and broad appeal of our stores and our merchandise allow us to operate successfully in major metropolitan markets such as Houston, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia; middle markets such as Birmingham, Alabama, Nashville, Tennessee, and Fresno, California; and smaller markets such as Lafayette, Louisiana, and Amarillo, Texas. As we execute our store growth strategy, we are increasingly focused on under-penetrated markets in the United States such as the Mid-Atlantic states, California and the Midwest to provide us with the unit growth to achieve our goals.

     Site selection. Our current strategy is to locate our stores in venues which are destinations for large numbers of shoppers and which reinforce our quality image and brand. To assess potential new locations, we review financial and demographic criteria and infrastructure for access. We also analyze the quality and relative location of co-tenants and competitive factors, square footage availability, frontage space and other relevant criteria to determine the overall acceptability of a property and the optimal locations within it.

     Historically, we preferred to locate stores in regional or super-regional malls with a history of high sales per square foot and multiple national department stores as anchors. Beginning in fiscal 2003, we increased our exploration of off-mall real estate alternatives. We have generally experienced better financial results in these off-mall venues, primarily due to higher sales volumes and lower occupancy costs, although recently, the difference in occupancy costs between these two venues has lessened. We also believe that our target shopper prefers the off-mall location for convenience in her shopping experience. As of January 29, 2011, of our 300 stores, 241 were in a variety of off-mall venues including “lifestyle” strip centers, “power” centers, outlet centers and freestanding locations. Off-mall stores tend to be slightly larger than mall stores. We currently anticipate that most of the new stores opening in fiscal 2011 and beyond will be located in off-mall power center venues.

     We believe we are a desirable tenant to developers because of our long and successful operating history, sales productivity, ability to attract customers, financial strength and our strong position with co-tenants in the home décor category. The following table provides a history of our store openings and closings by venue for the last five fiscal years.

		Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal
		2006				2007				2008				2009				2010
Mall
Stores open at beginning of period			210				168				121				91				66
Store openings			1				—				—				—				2
Store closings			(43	)			(47	)			(30	)			(25	)			(9	)
Stores open at end of period			168				121				91				66				59
Off-Mall

		Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal				Fiscal
		2006				2007				2008				2009				2010
Stores open at beginning of period			137				181				214				208				213
Store openings			48				35				3				18				36
Store closings			(4	)			(2	)			(9	)			(13	)			(8	)
Stores open at end of period			181				214				208				213				241
Total
Stores open at beginning of period			347				349				335				299				279
Store openings			49				35				3				18				38
Store closings			(47	)			(49	)			(39	)			(38	)			(17	)
Stores open at end of period			349				335				299				279				300

Distribution and Logistics

     We have implemented a comprehensive approach to the management of our merchandise supply chain. This approach entails a thorough evaluation of all parts of the supply chain, from the manufacturer to the store selling floor. In order to develop a more scalable infrastructure for our supply chain, during fiscal 2003 we leased a new, 771,000-square-foot distribution center in Jackson, Tennessee. This building was built to our specifications and opened in May 2004. The commencement of operations in the new distribution center was accompanied by the implementation of a new warehouse management system as well as investments in material handling equipment designed to streamline the flow of goods within the distribution center.

     In addition to making improvements to our distribution center operation, we have taken important steps to improve our efficiency in transporting merchandise to stores. We currently utilize third-party carriers to transport merchandise from our Jackson distribution center to our stores. Prior to fiscal 2006, the majority of our merchandise deliveries were handled by either less-than-truckload (“LTL”) carriers or full truckload deliveries to regional “pool points”, with local delivery agents handling the actual store delivery function. By the end of fiscal 2010, we had migrated 93% of our stores to less-frequent, full truckload deliveries. This alternative results in lower distribution costs and allows our field personnel to better schedule payroll for the receiving process. The optimal delivery method for a given store depends on the store’s sales volume, square footage, geographic location and other factors. This shift to direct store delivery methods has resulted in lower annual outbound freight costs both on a dollar basis and as a percentage of sales compared to LTL and pool point delivery methods used in the past.

     An important part of our efforts to achieve efficiencies, cost reductions and net sales growth is the continued identification and implementation of improvements to our planning, logistical and distribution infrastructure and our supply chain, including merchandise ordering, transportation and receipt processing. We also need to ensure that our distribution infrastructure and supply chain are kept in sync with our anticipated growth and increased number of stores. For the foreseeable future, we believe our current distribution infrastructure is adequate to support our operational needs.

Information Systems

     Our store information systems include a server in each store that runs our automated point-of-sale (“POS”) application on multiple POS registers. The server provides Store Managers with convenient access to detailed sales and inventory information for the store. Our POS registers provide a price look-up function (all merchandise is bar-coded), time and attendance, and automated check, credit card, debit card and gift card processing. Through nightly two-way electronic communication with each store, we upload SKU-level sales, gross margin information and payroll hours to our home office system and download new merchandise pricing, price changes for existing merchandise, purchase orders and system maintenance tasks to the store server. Based upon the evaluation of information obtained through daily polling, our planning and allocation team implements merchandising decisions regarding inventory levels, reorders, price changes and allocation of merchandise to our stores. We have completed a vendor selection process for new POS software, along with integrated workforce management capabilities. This new software will be tested during fiscal 2011 with a planned roll-out to stores in the second half of fiscal 2011 to early 2012.

     Our current merchandise management system integrates all merchandising and inventory management applications, including category, classification and SKU inventory tracking, purchase order management, automated ticket making, and sales audit. We completed a vendor selection process for this foundational merchandising system and are in the design phase of the new system implementation. Testing of the new system will occur throughout 2011 with an implementation targeted for early fiscal 2012. Our financial system applications, including general ledger and accounts payable, have already been upgraded to new software in February 2011 after a year-long design and testing phase.

     We moved into our new distribution center during the second quarter of 2004. Concurrent with this move, we implemented a new warehouse management system (WMS). The WMS was tailored to our specifications and provides us with a fully automated solution for all operations within the distribution center.

Marketing

     Although our overall marketing efforts encompass various different techniques, in recent years, we have had a specific focus on e-mail communication. We now manage a database of over 3 million e-mail addresses that have been provided by our customers, primarily through in-store collection processes. We use this database to communicate at least weekly with our loyal customer base about new products, in-store events and special offers. We are actively evaluating ways to enhance our marketing to customers through the testing of other forms of media advertising. For example, during fiscal 2009, we launched a new community web site at www.mykirklands.com that allows customers to interact with each other and provide commentary on our merchandise and stores. We also have a presence on social media sites such as Facebook.

     We utilize marketing efforts and other in-store activity to promote specific events in our stores, including our major semi-annual sale events. Our marketing efforts emphasize in-store signage, store and window banners and displays and other techniques to attract customers and provide an exciting shopping experience. Historically, we have not engaged in extensive media advertising because we believe that we have benefited from our strategic locations in high-traffic shopping centers and valuable “word-of-mouth” advertising by our customers.

     To drive customer loyalty, we provide our customers with the option to utilize Kirkland’s private-label credit card. This program is administered by a third-party, who bears the credit risk associated with the card program without recourse to us. As cardholders, customers are automatically enrolled in a loyalty program whereby they earn loyalty points for their purchases. Customers attaining specified levels of loyalty points are eligible for special discounts on future purchases. We believe that customers using the card visit our stores and purchase merchandise more frequently as well as spend more per visit than our customers not using the card. As of January 29, 2011, there were approximately 317,000 Kirkland’s private-label credit card holders, representing approximately 7% of total sales during fiscal 2010.

Internet and Social Media

     We believe the Internet offers opportunities to complement our “brick-and-mortar” stores, increase sales and increase consumer brand awareness of our products. In November of 2010, we launched a new and improved website at www.kirklands.com, which provides our customers with the ability to purchase Kirkland’s merchandise online and have it delivered directly to their homes or their nearest Kirkland’s store. Customers may also use the website as a resource to locate a store, preview our merchandise, apply for a Kirkland’s credit card, and purchase gift cards online. We are also very active in social media and have developed a social community website at www.mykirklands.com for home décor discussions, photographs, and reviews of Kirkland’s product. Over 150,000 customers have joined the site and regularly interact with each other and with professional designers with whom we have partnered to contribute content to the site. In addition, we maintain a presence on Facebook, where we have a growing fan base of over 140,000.

     The information contained or incorporated in our websites is not a part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Trademarks

     All of our stores operate under the names “Kirkland’s”, “Kirkland’s Home”, “Kirkland’s Home Outlet”, and “Kirkland’s Outlet.”

     We have registered several trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register that are used in connection with the Kirkland’s stores, including KIRKLAND’S^® logo design, THE KIRKLAND COLLECTION^®, HOME COLLECTION BY KIRKLAND’S^®, KIRKLAND’S OUTLET^®, KIRKLAND’S HOME^®, as well as several trademark registrations for Kirkland’s private label brand, the CEDAR CREEK COLLECTION^®. In addition to the registrations, Kirkland’s also is the common law owner of the trademark BRIAR PATCH^TM. These marks have historically been very important components in our merchandising and marketing strategy. We are not aware of any claims of infringement or other challenges to our right to use our marks in the United States.

Competition

     The retail market for home décor and gifts is highly competitive. Accordingly, we compete with a variety of specialty stores, department stores, discount stores and catalog and Internet retailers that carry merchandise in one or more categories also carried by our stores. Our product offerings also compete with a variety of national, regional and local retailers, including such retailers as HomeGoods, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Hobby Lobby, Pier 1 Imports and Target. Department stores typically have higher prices than our stores for similar merchandise. Specialty retailers tend to have higher prices and a narrower assortment of home décor products. Wholesale clubs may have lower prices than our stores, but the product assortment is generally more limited. We believe that the principal competitive factors influencing our business are merchandise novelty, quality and selection, price,

customer service, visual appeal of the merchandise and the store, and the convenience of our store locations.

     The number of companies offering a selection of home décor products that overlaps generally with our product assortment has increased over the last 10 years. However, we believe that our stores still occupy a distinct niche in the marketplace: traditionally-styled, quality merchandise, reflective of current market trends, offered at a value price combined with a unique store experience. We believe we compete effectively with other retailers due to our experience in identifying a broad collection of distinctive merchandise, pricing it to be attractive to the target Kirkland’s customer, presenting it in a visually appealing manner, and providing a quality store experience.

     In addition to competing for customers, we compete with other retailers for suitable store locations and qualified management personnel and sales associates. Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. See Item 1A of this Annual Report, “Risk Factors.”

Employees

     We employed 3,948 employees at March 24, 2011. The number of employees fluctuates with seasonal needs. None of our employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.

Availability of SEC Reports

     We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and other information with the SEC. Members of the public may read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Members of the public may also obtain information on the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including Kirkland’s, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and other information filed by us with the SEC are available, without charge, on our Internet web site, http://www.kirklands.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Copies are also available, without charge, by written request to: Secretary, Kirkland’s, Inc., 2501 McGavock Pike, Suite 1000, Nashville, TN 37214.

Executive Officers of Kirkland’s

     The name, age as of March 31, 2011, and position of each of our executive officers is as follows:

     Robert E. Alderson, 64, has been a Director of Kirkland’s since September 1986 and has been Chief Executive Officer since February 2006. He also served as Chief Executive Officer from March 2001 to May 2005. He currently serves as President of Kirkland’s and he also served as President of Kirkland’s both from February 2006 to March 2006 and from November 1997 to May 2005. Mr. Alderson served as Chief Operating Officer of Kirkland’s from November 1997 through March 2001 and as Vice President or Senior Vice President of Kirkland’s upon joining in 1986 through November 1997. He also served as Chief Administrative Officer of Kirkland’s from 1986 to 1997. Prior to joining Kirkland’s, Mr. Alderson was a senior partner at the law firm of Menzies, Rainey, Kizer & Alderson.

     W. Michael Madden, 41, has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2008 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2006. Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Madden served as Vice President of Finance from May 2005 to April 2006. From July 2000 to May 2005, he served as Director of Finance. Prior to joining Kirkland’s, Mr. Madden served as Assistant Controller with Trammell Crow Company and was with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. At PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, he served in positions of increasing responsibility over six years culminating as Manager-Assurance and Business Advisory Services where he worked with various clients, public and private, in the retail and consumer products industries.

     Michelle R. Graul, 45, has been Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Stores since January 2010 and Senior Vice President of Human Resources since August 2008. Prior to her appointment as Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Mrs. Graul served as Vice President of Human Resources from March 2005 to July 2008. Prior to joining Kirkland’s, Mrs. Graul was employed with Pier 1 Imports and served in various positions of increasing responsibility over 13 years culminating as Zone Human Resources Director. Prior to joining Pier 1 Imports, Mrs. Graul had positions with four other retailers serving in various store operational roles and as a buyer.

     No family relationships exist among any of the above-listed officers, and there are no arrangements or understandings between any

of the above-listed officers and any other person pursuant to which they serve as an officer. All officers are elected to hold office for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors

     Investing in our common stock involves risk. You should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, before investing in our common stock.

If We Do Not Generate Sufficient Cash Flow, We May Not Be Able to Implement Our Growth Strategy.

The rate of our expansion will depend on, among other factors, the availability of adequate capital, which in turn will depend in large part on cash flow generated by our business and the availability of equity and debt capital. The cost of opening new stores or expanding, remodeling and relocating existing stores — which is at the heart of our growth strategy — may increase in the future compared to historical costs. There can be no assurance that our business will generate adequate cash flow or that we will be able to obtain equity or debt capital on acceptable terms, or at all. Moreover, our senior credit facility contains provisions that restrict the amount of debt we may incur in the future. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital, we may be unable to open additional stores or expand, remodel and relocate existing stores as planned, which may adversely affect our growth strategy resulting in a decrease in net sales. There can be no assurances that we will be able to achieve our current plans for the opening of new stores and the expansion, remodeling or relocation of existing stores.

If We Are Unable to Profitably Open and Operate New Stores, We May Not Be Able to Adequately Execute Our Growth Strategy, Resulting in a Decrease in Net Sales and Net Income.

A key element of our growth strategy is to open new stores, both in existing markets and in new geographic markets that we select based on customer data and demographics. During fiscal 2010, we opened 38 new stores, and our future operating results will depend to a substantial extent on whether we are able to continue to open and operate new stores successfully.

Our ability to open new stores and to expand, remodel and relocate existing stores depends on a number of factors, including the preveiling conditions in the commercial real-estate market and our ability to:

•		Maintain or obtain adequate capital resources for leasehold improvements, fixtures and inventory on acceptable terms;
•		locate and obtain favorable store sites and negotiate acceptable lease terms;
•		construct or refurbish store sites;
•		obtain and distribute adequate product supplies to our stores;
•		maintain adequate warehousing and distribution capability at acceptable costs;
•		hire, train and retain skilled managers and personnel; and
•		continue to upgrade our information and other operating systems to control the anticipated growth and expanded operations.

There also can be no assurance that we will be able to open, expand, remodel and relocate stores at the anticipated rate, if at all. Furthermore, if we are unable to open new stores, there is no assurance that these new stores will generate net sales levels necessary to achieve store-level profitability. New stores that we open in our existing markets may draw customers away from our existing stores and may have lower net sales growth compared to stores opened in new markets.

New stores also may face greater competition and have lower anticipated net sales volumes relative to previously opened stores during their comparable years of operations. New stores opened in new markets, where we are less familiar with the target customer and less well known, may face different or additional risks and increased costs compared to stores operated in existing markets. Also, stores opened in off-mall locations may require greater marketing costs in order to attract customer traffic. These factors, together with increased pre-opening expenses at our new stores, may reduce our average store contribution and operating margins. If we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores and maintain the profitability of our existing stores, our net income could suffer.

The success of our growth plan will be dependent on our ability to promote and/or recruit enough qualified district managers, store managers and sales associates to support the expected growth in the number of our stores, and the time and effort required to train and supervise a large number of new managers and associates may divert resources from our existing stores and adversely affect our

operating and financial performance. Our operating expenses would also increase as a result of any increase in the minimum wage or other factors that would require increases in the compensation paid to our employees.

Our Success Depends Upon our Marketing, Advertising and Promotional Efforts. If We are Unable to Implement them Successfully, or if Our Competitors are More Effective Than We are, Our Revenue May Be Adversely Affected.

We use marketing and promotional programs to attract customers to our stores and to encourage purchases by our customers. We use various media for our promotional efforts, including print, database marketing, email communications and other electronic communications such as online social networks. If we fail to choose the appropriate medium for our efforts, or fail to implement and execute new marketing opportunities, our competitors may be able to attract some of our customers. Changes in the amount and degree of promotional intensity or merchandising strategy by our competitors could cause us to have difficulties in retaining existing customers and attracting new customers.

Weather Conditions Could Adversely Affect Our Sales and/or Profitability by Affecting Consumer Shopping Patterns.

Our operating results may be adversely affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Frequent or unusually have snow, ice or rain storms or extended periods of unseasonable temperatures in our markets could adversely affect our performance by affecting customer shopping patterns or diminishing demand for seasonal merchandise.

Our Performance May be Affected by General Economic Conditions.

Our performance is subject to worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of consumer spending. Some of the factors that have had, any may in the future have an impact on discretionary consumer spending include national or global economic downturns, an increase in consumer debt (and a corresponding decrease in the availability of affordable consumer credit), reductions in net worth based on recent severe market declines, softness in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, changes in taxation, increases in fuel and energy prices, fluctuation in interest rates, low consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors.

Specialty retail is a cyclical industry that is heavily dependent upon the overall level of consumer spending. Purchases of home décor and gifts tend to be highly correlated with cycles in consumers’ disposable income and trends in the housing market both new and existing. A weak retail environment could impact customer traffic in our stores and also adversely affect our net sales. Because of the seasonality of our business, economic downturns, increased sourcing costs, or in scarcity in equipment during the last quarter of our fiscal year could adversely affect us to a greater extent than if such downturns occurred at other times of the year. Purchases of home décor items may decline during recessionary periods, and a prolonged recession, and any related decrease in consumers’ disposable incomes, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the event of a tightening of credit markets or turmoil in the financial markets as we experienced in recent years, our ability to access funds, refinance our existing indebtedness (if necessary), enter into agreements for new indebtedness or obtain funding through the issuance of our securities would be adversely impacted.

The impact of any such credit crisis or market turmoil on our major suppliers cannot be predicted. The inability of key suppliers to access liquidity, or the insolvency of key suppliers, could lead to their failure to deliver our merchandise. Worsening economic conditions could also result in difficulties for financial institutions (including bank failures) and other parties that we may do business with, which could potentially, impair our ability to access financing under existing arrangements or to otherwise recover amounts as they become due under our other contractual arrangements. Additionally, both as a result and independent of the current financial crisis in the United States, material fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a negative impact on our business.

We May Not Be Able to Successfully Anticipate Consumer Trends and Our Failure to Do So May Lead to Loss of Consumer Acceptance of Our Products Resulting in Reduced Net Sales.

Our success depends on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing merchandise trends and consumer demands in a timely manner. If we fail to identify and respond to emerging trends, consumer acceptance of the merchandise in our stores and our image with our customers may be harmed, which could reduce customer traffic in our stores and materially adversely affect our net sales. Additionally, if we misjudge market trends, we may significantly overstock unpopular products and be forced to take significant inventory markdowns, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit and cash flow. Conversely, shortages of items that prove popular could reduce our net sales. In addition, a major shift in consumer demand away from home décor could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our Freight Costs and thus Our Cost of Goods Sold are Impacted by Changes in Fuel Prices.

Our freight cost is impacted by changes in fuel prices through surcharges. Fuel prices and surcharges affect freight costs both on inbound freight from vendors to our distribution center and outbound freight from our distribution center to our stores. Increased fuel prices or surcharges may increase freight costs and thereby increase our cost of goods sold.

New Legal Requirements Could Adversely Affect Our Operating Results.

Our sales and results of operations may be adversely affected by new legal requirements, including health care reform and proposed climate change and other environmental legislation and regulations.

In 2010, the Patient Protection Act and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were signed into law in the U.S. This legislation expands health care coverage to many uninsured individuals and expands coverage to those already insured. The changes required by this legislation could cause us to incur additional health care and other costs, but we do not expect any material short-term impact on our financial results as a result of the legislation and are currently assessing the extent of any long-term impact.

The costs and other effects of other new legal requirements cannot be determined with certainty. For example, new legislation or regulations may result in increased costs directly for our compliance or indirectly to the extent such requirements increase prices of goods and services because of increased compliance costs or reduced availability of raw materials.

The Market Price for Our Common Stock Might Be Volatile and Could Result in a Decline in the Value of Your Investment.

The price at which our common stock trades may be volatile. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to our operating results, general trends and prospects for the retail industry, announcements by our competitors, analyst recommendations, our ability to meet or exceed analysts’ or investors’ expectations, the condition of the financial markets and other factors. In addition, the stock market in recent years has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies. These fluctuations, as well as general economic and market conditions, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock notwithstanding our actual operating performance.

Our Comparable Store Net Sales Fluctuate Due to a Variety of Factors.

Numerous factors affect our comparable store net sales results, including among others, weather conditions, retail trends, the retail sales environment, economic conditions, the impact of competition and our ability to execute our business strategy efficiently. Our comparable store net sales results have historically experienced fluctuations, including declines some fiscal periods. Our comparable store net sales may not increase from quarter to quarter, or may decline. As a result, the unpredictability of our comparable store net sales may cause our revenues and operating results to vary quarter to quarter, and an unanticipated decline in revenues or comparable store net sales may cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

Failure to Protect the Integrity and Security of Individually Identifiable Data of Our Customers and Employees Could Expose Us to Litigation and Damage Our Reputation.

We receive and maintain certain personal information about our customers and employees. Our use of this information is regulated at the international, federal and state levels, as well as by certain third-party contracts. If our security and information systems are compromised or our business associates fail to comply with these laws and regulations and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately, it could adversely affect our reputation, as well as operations, results of operations, and financial condition, and could result in litigation or the imposition of penalties. As privacy and information security laws and regulations change, we may incur additional costs to ensure we remain in compliance.

We Face an Extremely Competitive Specialty Retail Business Market, and Such Competition Could Result in a Reduction of Our Prices and a Loss of Our Market Share.

The retail market is highly competitive. We compete against a diverse group of retailers, including specialty stores, department stores, discount stores and catalog retailers, which carry merchandise in one or more categories also carried by us. Our product offerings also compete with a variety of national, regional and local retailers, including such retailers as HomeGoods, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Hobby Lobby, Pier 1 Imports and Target. We also compete with these and other retailers for suitable retail locations, suppliers, qualified employees and management personnel. One or more of our competitors are present in substantially all of the markets in which we have stores. Many of our competitors are larger and have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. This competition could result in the reduction of our prices and a loss of our market share. Our net sales are also impacted by store liquidations of our competitors. We believe that our stores compete primarily on the basis of merchandise quality and selection, price, visual appeal of the merchandise and the store and convenience of location.

We Depend on a Number of Vendors to Supply Our Merchandise, and Any Delay in Merchandise Deliveries from Certain Vendors May Lead to a Decline in Inventory Which Could Result in a Loss of Net Sales.

We purchase our products from approximately 200 vendors with which we have no long-term purchase commitments or exclusive contracts. Historically, we have retained our vendors and we have generally not experienced difficulty in obtaining desired merchandise from vendors on acceptable terms. However, our arrangements with these vendors do not guarantee the availability of merchandise, establish guaranteed prices or provide for the continuation of particular pricing practices. Our current vendors may not continue to sell products to us on current terms or at all, and we may not be able to establish relationships with new vendors to ensure delivery of products in a timely manner or on terms acceptable to us. In addition, a period of unfavorable financial performance may make it difficult for some of our vendors to arrange for the financing or factoring of their orders with manufacturers, which could result in our inability to obtain desired merchandise from those vendors.

We may not be able to acquire desired merchandise in sufficient quantities on terms acceptable to us in the future. Also, our business would be adversely affected if there were delays in product shipments to us due to freight difficulties, strikes or other difficulties at our principal transport providers or otherwise. We have from time to time experienced delays of this nature. We are also dependent on vendors for assuring the quality of merchandise supplied to us. Our inability to acquire suitable merchandise in the future or the loss of one or more of our vendors and our failure to replace any one or more of them may harm our relationship with our customers resulting in a loss of net sales.

We Are Dependent on Foreign Imports for a Significant Portion of Our Merchandise, and Any Changes in the Trading Relations and Conditions Between the United States and the Relevant Foreign Countries May Lead to a Decline in Inventory Resulting in a Decline in Net Sales, or an Increase in the Cost of Sales Resulting in Reduced Gross Profit.

Most of our merchandise is purchased through vendors in the United States who import the merchandise from foreign countries, primarily China. Our vendors are subject to the risks involved with relying on products manufactured abroad, and we remain subject to those risks to the extent that their effects are passed through to us by our vendors or cause disruptions in supply. These risks include changes in import duties, quotas, loss of “most favored nation” trading status with the United States for a particular foreign country, work stoppages, delays in shipments, first cost price increases, freight cost increases, exchange rate fluctuations, terrorism, war, economic uncertainties (including inflation, foreign government regulations and political unrest) and trade restrictions (including the United States imposing antidumping or countervailing duty orders, safeguards, remedies or compensation and retaliation due to illegal foreign trade practices). If any of these or other factors were to cause a disruption of trade from the countries in which the suppliers of our vendors are located, our inventory levels may be reduced or the cost of our products may increase.

Historically, instability in the political and economic environments of the countries in which our vendors obtain our products has not had a material adverse effect on our operations. However, we cannot predict the effect that future changes in economic or political conditions in such foreign countries may have on our operations. Although we believe that we could access alternative sources in the event of disruptions or delays in supply due to economic, political or health conditions in foreign countries on our vendors, such disruptions or delays may adversely affect our results of operations unless and until alternative supply arrangements could be made. In addition, merchandise purchased from alternative sources may be of lesser quality or more expensive than the merchandise we currently purchase abroad.

Countries from which our vendors obtain these products may, from time to time, impose new or adjust prevailing quotas or other restrictions on exported products, and the United States may impose new duties, quotas and other restrictions on imported products. This could disrupt the supply of such products to us and adversely affect our operations. The United States Congress periodically considers other restrictions on the importation of products obtained for us by vendors. The cost of such products may increase for us if applicable duties are raised or import quotas with respect to such products are imposed or made more restrictive.

We are also subject to the risk that the manufacturers abroad who ultimately manufacture our products may employ labor practices that are not consistent with acceptable practices in the United States. In any such event we could be hurt by negative publicity with respect to those practices and, in some cases, face liability for those practices.

Our Success Is Highly Dependent on Our Planning and Control Processes and Our Supply Chain, and Any Disruption in or Failure to Continue to Improve These Processes May Result in a Loss of Net Sales and Net Income.

An important part of our efforts to achieve efficiencies, cost reductions and net sales growth is the continued identification and implementation of improvements to our planning, logistical and distribution infrastructure and our supply chain, including merchandise ordering, transportation and receipt processing. In addition, recent increases in energy prices have resulted, and are expected to continue to result, in increased merchandise and freight costs, which cannot readily be offset through higher prices because of competitive factors.

A significant portion of the distribution of products to our stores is coordinated through our distribution facility in Jackson, Tennessee. We depend on the orderly operation of this receiving and distribution process, which depends on adherence to shipping schedules and

effective management of the distribution center. We cannot assure that events beyond our control, such as disruptions due to fire or other catastrophic events, labor disagreements or shipping problems, will not result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores. We also cannot guarantee that our insurance will be sufficient, or that insurance proceeds will be timely paid to us, in the event our distribution center is shut down for any reason. Any significant disruption in the operations of this facility would have a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain proper inventory levels in our stores which could result in a loss of net sales and net income.

Our Business Is Highly Seasonal and Our Fourth Quarter Contributes a Disproportionate Amount of Our Net Sales, Net Income and Cash Flow, and Any Factors Negatively Impacting Us During Our Fourth Quarter Could Reduce Our Net Sales, Net Income and Cash Flow, Leaving Us with Excess Inventory and Making It More Difficult for Us to Finance Our Capital Requirements.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, substantial seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results, which are typical of many specialty retailers and common to most retailers generally. Due to the importance of the fall selling season, which includes Thanksgiving and Christmas, the last quarter of our fiscal year has historically contributed, and is expected to continue to contribute, a disproportionate amount of our net sales, net income and cash flow for the entire fiscal year. We expect this pattern to continue during the current fiscal year and anticipate that in subsequent fiscal years, the last quarter of our fiscal year will continue to contribute disproportionately to our operating results and cash flow. Any factors negatively affecting us during the last quarter of our fiscal year, including unfavorable economic or weather conditions, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, reducing our cash flow, leaving us with excess inventory and making it more difficult for us to finance our capital requirements.

We May Experience Significant Variations in Our Quarterly Results.

Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly based upon such factors as the timing of new store openings, pre-opening expenses associated with new stores, the relative proportion of new stores to mature stores, net sales contributed by new stores, increases or decreases in comparable store net sales, adverse weather conditions, shifts in the timing of holidays, the timing and level of markdowns, changes in fuel and other shipping costs, changes in our product mix and actions taken by our competitors.

Our Hardware and Software Systems Are Vulnerable to Damage that Could Harm Our Business.

We rely upon our existing information systems for operating and monitoring all major aspects of our business, including sales, warehousing, distribution, purchasing, inventory control, merchandise planning and replenishment, as well as various financial functions. These systems and our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

	•		fire, flood and other natural disasters;
	•		power loss, computer systems failures, internet and telecommunications or data network failure, operator negligence, improper operation by or supervision of employees, physical and electronic loss of data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar events; and
	•		computer viruses.

Any disruption in the operation of our information systems, the loss of employees knowledgeable about such systems or our failure to continue to effectively modify such systems could interrupt our operations or interfere with our ability to monitor inventory, which could result in reduced net sales and affect our operations and financial performance. We also need to ensure that our systems are consistently adequate to handle our anticipated store growth and are upgraded as necessary to meet our needs. The cost of any such system upgrades or enhancements would be significant.

We Depend on Key Personnel, and if We Lose the Services of Any Member of Our Senior Management Team, We May Not Be Able to Run Our Business Effectively.

We have benefited substantially from the leadership and performance of our senior management team. Our success will depend on our ability to retain our current senior management members and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and there can be no assurances that we will be able to retain our personnel. The loss of a member of senior management would require the remaining executive officers to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement.

Our Charter and Bylaw Provisions and Certain Provisions of Tennessee Law May Make It Difficult in Some Respects to Cause a Change in Control of Kirkland’s and Replace Incumbent Management.

Our charter authorizes the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock with such designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors is empowered, without shareholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could materially adversely affect

the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. Holders of the common stock do not have preemptive rights to subscribe for a pro rata portion of any capital stock which may be issued by us. In the event of issuance, such preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of Kirkland’s. Although we have no present intention to issue any new shares of preferred stock, we may do so in the future.

Our charter and bylaws contain certain corporate governance provisions that may make it more difficult to challenge management, may deter and inhibit unsolicited changes in control of Kirkland’s and may have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium over the prevailing market price of our common stock in the event of an attempted hostile takeover. First, the charter provides for a classified Board of Directors, with directors (after the expiration of the terms of the initial classified board of directors) serving three year terms from the year of their respective elections and being subject to removal only for cause and upon the vote of 80% of the voting power of all outstanding capital stock entitled to vote (the “Voting Power”). Second, our charter and bylaws do not generally permit shareholders to call, or require that the Board of Directors call, a special meeting of shareholders. The charter and bylaws also limit the business permitted to be conducted at any such special meeting. In addition, Tennessee law permits action to be taken by the shareholders by written consent only if the action is consented to by holders of the number of shares required to authorize shareholder action and if all shareholders entitled to vote are parties to the written consent. Third, the bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring other business before meetings of the shareholders. Only those shareholder nominees who are nominated in accordance with this procedure are eligible for election as directors of Kirkland’s, and only such shareholder proposals may be considered at a meeting of shareholders as have been presented to Kirkland’s in accordance with the procedure. Finally, the charter provides that the amendment or repeal of any of the foregoing provisions of the charter mentioned previously in this paragraph requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the Voting Power. In addition, the bylaws provide that the amendment or repeal by shareholders of any bylaws made by our Board of Directors requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the Voting Power.

Furthermore, Kirkland’s is subject to certain provisions of Tennessee law, including certain Tennessee corporate takeover acts that are, or may be, applicable to us. These acts include the Investor Protection Act, the Business Combination Act and the Tennessee Greenmail Act, and these acts seek to limit the parameters in which certain business combinations and share exchanges occur. The charter, bylaws and Tennessee law provisions may have an anti-takeover effect, including possibly discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for our common stock.

Concentration of Ownership among Our Existing Directors, Executive Officers, and Their Affiliates May Prevent New Investors from Influencing Significant Corporate Decisions.

As of the date of this filing, our current directors, executive officers and their affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 17% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these shareholders are able to exercise a controlling influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, and will have significant control over our management and policies. These shareholders may support proposals and actions with which you may disagree or which are not in your interests.

If We Fail to Maintain an Effective System of Internal Control, We May Not be Able to Accurately Report Our Financial Results.

We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, but there are limitations inherent in internal control systems. If we are unable to maintain adequate and effective internal control over financial reporting, our financial reporting could be adversely affected. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be appropriate relative to their costs.

Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.		Properties

     We lease all of our store locations and expect to continue our practice of leasing rather than owning. Our leases typically provide for 5-10 year initial terms, many with the ability for us (or the landlord) to terminate the lease at specified points during the term if net sales at the leased premises do not reach a certain annual level. Many of our leases provide for payment of percentage rent (i.e., a percentage of net sales in excess of a specified level) and the rate of increase in key ancillary charges is generally capped.

     As current leases expire, we believe we have the option to obtain favorable lease renewals for present store locations or obtain new leases for equivalent or better locations in the same general area. To date, we have not experienced unusual difficulty in either renewing or extending leases for existing locations or securing leases for suitable locations for new stores. A majority of our store

leases contain provisions permitting the landlord to terminate the lease upon a change in control of Kirkland’s.

     We currently lease one central distribution facility, consisting of 771,000 square feet, located in Jackson, Tennessee. This lease has a 15-year initial term, with two five-year options. On March 1, 2007, we entered into an Office Lease Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2007 with a landlord, whereby we leased 27,547 square feet of office space in Nashville, Tennessee for a seven-year term with an option to renew the lease for an additional seven years. On December 3, 2009, we amended the Office Lease Agreement to include an additional 9,798 square feet of adjoining office space. The combined Nashville office houses the merchandising, marketing, store operations and real estate teams, as well as certain other senior management personnel.

     The following table indicates the states where our stores are located and the number of stores within each state as of January 29, 2011:

Alabama			16
Arizona			13
Arkansas			7
California			12
Colorado			1
Delaware			1
Florida			37
Georgia			17
Illinois			6
Indiana			5
Iowa			1
Kansas			2
Kentucky			8
Louisiana			11
Maryland			4
Michigan			3
Minnesota			4
Mississippi			10
Missouri			6
Nevada			2
New York			7
North Carolina			19
Ohio			7
Oklahoma			5
Pennsylvania			5
South Carolina			8
Tennessee			15
Texas			56
Virginia			9
Wisconsin			3
Total			300

Item 3.		Legal Proceedings

     We are involved in various routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe any resulting liability from existing legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition. Although the outcome of such proceedings and claims cannot be determined with certainty, we believe that it is unlikely that these proceedings and claims in excess of insurance coverage will have a material effect on our operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Item 4.		Reserved

     Reserved.

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer of Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “KIRK.” We commenced trading on Nasdaq on July 11, 2002. On March 30, 2011, there were approximately 75 holders of record and approximately 4,700 beneficial owners, of our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low last sale prices of our common stock for the periods indicated.

		Fiscal 2010								Fiscal 2009
		High				Low				High				Low
First Quarter		$	24.53			$	14.20			$	7.00			$	2.65
Second Quarter		$	23.65			$	14.93			$	14.42			$	5.74
Third Quarter		$	18.20			$	11.15			$	15.40			$	11.18
Fourth Quarter		$	14.73			$	10.79			$	18.95			$	12.68

Dividend Policy

     There have been no dividends declared on any class of our common stock during the past two fiscal years. Our senior credit facility restricts the payment of cash dividends. Future cash dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors and will be based upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, debt covenants and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

Stock Price Performance Graph

     This graph shows, from the end of fiscal year 2005 to the end of fiscal 2010, changes in the value of Kirkland’s stock as compared to Standard and Poor’s 500 Composite Index (“S&P 500”).

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data

     The following selected financial data is derived from our consolidated financial statements. The data below should be read in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

		Fiscal Year
(numbers in thousands, except per share amounts)		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006 (11)
Summary of Operations
Total revenue (1)		$	415,300			$	406,194			$	391,277			$	396,701			$	446,828
Gross profit			170,536				168,506				133,991				112,714				137,321
Operating expenses (2)			115,745				107,063				105,581				118,261				119,915
Depreciation and amortization			12,817				14,505				18,741				20,391				18,084
Operating income (loss)			41,974				46,938				9,669				(25,938	)			(678	)
Other (income) and expenses, net			(194	)			(47	)			(419	)			328				(521	)
Income (loss) before income taxes			42,168				46,985				10,088				(26,266	)			(157	)
Net income (loss) (3)		$	26,431			$	34,570			$	9,305			$	(25,906	)		$	(140	)
GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	1.28			$	1.71			$	0.47			$	(1.33	)		$	(0.01	)
Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share (4)		$	1.24			$	1.42			$	0.30			$	(0.91	)		$	(0.01	)
Other Financial Data
Comparable store sales increase (decrease) (5)			(0.5	%)			8.4	%			3.6	%			(13.3	%)			(6.6	%)
Number of stores at year end			300				279				299				335				349
Average total revenue per store		$	1,419				1,374				1,218				1,126				1,272
Average net sales per square foot (6)		$	231				224				210				204				247
Average square footage per store at fiscal year end			6,425				6,073				5,823				5,755				5,458
Merchandise margin as a percentage of total revenue (7)			54.0	%			55.2	%			51.0	%			47.5	%			48.4	%
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue			41.1	%			41.5	%			34.2	%			28.4	%			30.7	%
Compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue			18.0	%			17.6	%			17.8	%			18.5	%			17.3	%
Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue			9.9	%			8.8	%			9.2	%			10.4	%			9.3	%
Effective tax rate			37.3	%			26.4	%			7.8	%			(1.4	%)			(10.8	%)
Inventory yield (8)			372.7	%			396.5	%			297.0	%			226.0	%			275.0	%
Return on assets (ROA) (9)			14.7	%			23.7	%			7.5	%			(21.4	%)			(0.1	%)
Return on equity (ROE) (10)			25.6	%			49.1	%			19.6	%			(46.9	%)			(1.0	%)
Balance Sheet Data
Current assets		$	146,670				123,650				81,322				57,934				78,220
Working capital		$	100,781				75,572				37,491				16,582				30,856

		Fiscal Year Ended
		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006 (11)
		(numbers in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total assets		$	195,077				165,541				126,764				122,132				151,466
Current liabilities		$	45,889				48,078				43,831				41,352				47,364
Total liabilities		$	76,788				77,056				74,413				79,562				83,484
Shareholders’ equity		$	118,289				88,485				52,351				42,570				67,982

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The following discussion should be read with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. A number of the matters and subject areas discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K are not limited to historical or current facts and deal with potential future circumstances and developments and are accordingly “forward-looking statements.” You are cautioned that such forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions, are only predictions and that actual events or results may differ materially.

     Our fiscal year is comprised of the 52 or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. Accordingly, fiscal 2010 represented the 52 weeks ended on January 29, 2011. Fiscal 2009 represented the 52 weeks ended on January 30, 2010. Fiscal 2008 represented the 52 weeks ended on January 31, 2009.

Introduction

     We are a specialty retailer of home décor and gifts in the United States, operating 300 stores in 30 states as of January 29, 2011. Our stores present a broad selection of distinctive merchandise, including framed art, mirrors, wall décor, candles and related items, lamps, decorative accessories, accent furniture, textiles, garden-related accessories and artificial floral products. Our stores also offer an extensive assortment of holiday merchandise, as well as items carried throughout the year suitable for gift-giving. Our stores offer a unique combination of style and value that has led to our emergence as a leader in home décor and has enabled us to develop a strong customer franchise. As a result, we have achieved substantial growth during our 45-year history and have expanded our store base into different regions of the country.

Overview of Key Financial Measures

     Total revenue and gross profit are the most significant drivers to our operating performance. Total revenue consists of all merchandise sales to customers, gift card breakage and shipping revenue associated with internet sales, net of estimated returns and exclusive of sales taxes. Our total revenue for fiscal 2010 increased by 2.2% to $415.3 million from $406.2 million in fiscal 2009. The net sales increase in fiscal 2010 resulted primarily from the strong sales performance of our new store openings partially offset by store closings and a decrease in our comparable store sales. Comparable store sales decreased 0.5% for fiscal 2010. We use comparable store sales to measure our ability to achieve sales increases from stores that have been open for at least 13 full fiscal months. Increases in comparable store sales are an important factor in maintaining or increasing the profitability of existing stores.

     Gross profit is the difference between total revenue and cost of sales. Cost of sales has four distinct components: product cost (including inbound freight), outbound freight cost, store occupancy costs, and central distribution costs. Product costs comprise the majority of cost of sales, while central distribution costs are the least significant of these four elements. Product and outbound freight costs are variable, while occupancy and central distribution costs are largely fixed. Accordingly, gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue can be influenced by many factors including overall sales performance. For fiscal 2010, gross profit increased 1.2% to $170.5 million from $168.5 million for fiscal 2009. Gross profit percentage for fiscal 2010 decreased to 41.1% of total revenue from 41.5% of total revenue for fiscal 2009, primarily due to higher inbound freight cost coupled with a slightly higher rate of promotional activity and markdowns compared to the prior year period.

     Operating expenses, including the costs of operating our stores and corporate headquarters, are also an important component of our operating performance. Compensation and benefits comprise the majority of our operating expenses. Operating expenses contain fixed and variable costs, and managing the operating expense ratio (operating expenses expressed as a percentage of net sales) is an important focus of management as we seek to increase our overall profitability. Operating expenses include cash costs as well as non-cash costs such as depreciation and amortization. Because many operating expenses are fixed costs, and because operating costs tend to rise over time, increases in comparable store sales typically are necessary to prevent meaningful increases in the operating expense ratio. Operating expenses can also include certain costs that are of a one-time or non-recurring nature. While these costs must be considered to understand fully our operating performance, we typically identify such costs separately where significant in the consolidated statements of income so that we can evaluate comparable expense data across different periods.

     For fiscal 2010, we reported net income of $26.4 million, or $1.28 per diluted share, compared with net income of $34.6 million or $1.71 per diluted share for fiscal 2009. We believe that expressing net income and earnings per share for quarterly and annual fiscal 2010 results using a normalized tax rate is instrumental in judging our performance for future periods when we expect to incur such normalized tax rates. Excluding adjustments to our valuation allowance on deferred taxes and certain income tax credits related to prior periods, we would have reported net income of $25.6 million, or $1.24 per share, and $28.7 million, or $1.42 per share, for fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures is presented on page 24.

Strategic Areas of Emphasis

     We returned to net store growth during fiscal 2010, ending the year with 300 stores versus 279 stores at the end of fiscal 2009. Our approach to new store growth in fiscal 2011 will continue to focus on replacements of successful mall stores and smaller-sized off-mall stores with new, larger off-mall locations that we believe have better long-term sales potential. Additionally, we expect to open stores in existing underpenetrated markets and selected new geographical markets. During fiscal 2011, we expect to open a total of 40 to 45 stores, and expect to close approximately 15 to 20 stores. Many of these expected closings are currently in markets where we are pursuing or have identified a relocation opportunity. Fiscal 2011 new stores openings will be weighted toward the back half of the year while store closings for fiscal 2011 are expected to occur at fairly regular intervals over the course of the entire fiscal year.

     The following table summarizes our stores in terms of size as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010:

		As of				As of
		January 29, 2011				January 30, 2010
Number of Stores			300				279
Square footage			1,927,454				1,694,364
Average square footage per store			6,425				6,073

     An important part of our growth strategy includes investing in technology to provide the infrastructure to support our future needs. During fiscal 2010, we launched a new ecommerce website — www.kirklands.com — which allows customers to preview and purchase Kirkland’s merchandise online and have it delivered to their home or nearest Kirkland’s store. We also launched a new financial and general ledger platform in February, 2011.

     Looking forward, we are also planning for enhancements or replacements of other key software applications in the areas of point-of-sale (“POS”), workforce management, merchandising, planning and allocation and customer relationship management. We also plan to further develop our e-commerce capabilities by adding vendor “drop-ship” to customer functionality, allowing us to expand our product assortment on the website. These projects are in various phases and will be implemented in stages over the next two fiscal years. We view these technology projects as essential and supportive to the execution of our growth strategy.

     Our cash balances increased from $76.4 million at January 30, 2010 to $91.2 million at January 29, 2011 primarily due to maintaining a strong gross margin during fiscal 2010. Our objective is to finance all of our operating and investing activities for fiscal 2011 with cash provided by operations. We expect that capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 will range from $25 million to $28 million,

and will be used primarily to fund leasehold improvements of approximately 40 to 45 new stores and to maintain our investments in existing stores and our distribution center, as well as to improve our information technology infrastructure.

Fiscal 2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009

     Results of operations. The table below sets forth selected results of our operations both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:

		Fiscal 2010								Fiscal 2009								Change
		$				%				$				%				$				%
Net sales		$	414,719				99.9	%		$	405,676				99.9	%		$	9,043				2.2	%
Gift card breakage revenue			581				0.1	%			518				0.1	%			63				12.2	%
Total revenue			415,300				100.0	%			406,194				100.0	%			9,106				2.2	%
Cost of sales			244,764				58.9	%			237,688				58.5	%			7,076				3.0	%
Gross profit			170,536				41.1	%			168,506				41.5	%			2,029				1.2	%
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits			74,799				18.0	%			71,300				17.6	%			3,498				4.9	%
Other operating expenses			40,946				9.9	%			35,763				8.8	%			5,183				14.5	%
Depreciation			12,817				3.1	%			14,505				3.6	%			(1,688	)			(11.6	%)
Operating income			41,974				10.1	%			46,938				11.6	%			(4,964	)			(10.3	%)
Interest expense, net			137				0.0	%			209				0.1	%			(72	)			(34.6	%)
Other income, net			(331	)			(0.1	)%			(256	)			(0.1	)%			(75	)			29.3	%
Income before income taxes			42,168				10.2	%			46,985				11.6	%			(4,817	)			(10.3	%)
Income tax expense			15,737				3.8	%			12,415				3.1	%			3,322				26.8	%
Net income		$	26,431				6.4	%		$	34,570				8.5	%		$	(8,139	)			(23.5	%)

     Net sales. Net sales increased by 2.2% to $414.7 million for fiscal 2010 from $405.7 million for fiscal 2009. The net sales increase in fiscal 2010 resulted primarily from the strong sales performance of our new store openings partially offset by store closings. We opened 38 new stores in fiscal 2010 and 18 new stores in fiscal 2009, and we closed 17 stores in fiscal 2010 and 38 stores in fiscal 2009. Additionally, during November 2010, we launched kirklands.com for “direct-to-customer” selling. This accounted for $1.2 million in sales during fiscal 2010. The positive impact of these factors was offset somewhat by a decline of 0.5% in comparable stores sales for fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2009, comparable store sales increased 8.4%. The comparable store sales decrease accounted for a $1.9 million decline in overall sales, while the net growth of the store base and the launch of internet selling accounted for a $10.9 million increase in sales. The comparable store sales decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average ticket, partially offset by an increase in customer traffic and transactions. The decrease in the average ticket was the result of a lower average retail selling price, partially offset by an increase in items per transaction. Merchandise categories that performed the strongest in fiscal 2010 were floral, gift/novelty, wall décor and seasonal. Categories performing below fiscal 2009 levels were art, candles and accessories, decorative accessories and frames.

     Gross profit. Gross profit increased $2.0 million, or 1.2%, to $170.5 million for fiscal 2010 from $168.5 million for fiscal 2009. Gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 41.1% for fiscal 2010, from 41.5% for fiscal 2009. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of total revenue was primarily driven by lower merchandise margins, which declined from 55.2% in fiscal 2009 to 54.0% in fiscal 2010. Merchandise margin is calculated as total revenue minus product cost of sales. Merchandise margin excludes outbound freight, store occupancy and central distribution costs. The decrease in merchandise margin was primarily the result of increased ocean freight costs and a slight increase in the rate of markdown as compared to the prior year period. Store occupancy costs as a percentage of total revenue decreased from $38.0 million, or 9.4% of total revenue in fiscal 2009 to $35.4 million, or 8.5% of total revenue in fiscal 2010. This decline resulted from favorable lease renewal or extension terms, strong new store performance and the closure of underperforming stores. Outbound freight costs increased as a percentage of total revenue reflecting an increase in diesel costs. Central distribution expenses were flat as a percentage of total revenue.

     Compensation and benefits. Compensation and benefits, including both store and corporate personnel, was $74.8 million, or 18.0% of total revenue, for fiscal 2010, as compared to $71.3 million, or 17.6% for fiscal 2009. The increase in the compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenue was primarily due to the increase in stock compensation expense due to higher equity valuations.

     Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses, including both store and corporate costs, were $40.9 million, or 9.9% of total revenue, for fiscal 2010 as compared to $35.8 million, or 8.8% of total revenue, for fiscal 2009. Operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue increased primarily due to higher marketing expenses, meeting expenses, travel expenses and information technology maintenance expenses as compared to the prior year period.

     Depreciation. Depreciation expense was $12.8 million, or 3.1% of total revenue, for fiscal 2010 as compared to $14.5 million, or 3.6% of total revenue, for fiscal 2009. The decrease in depreciation reflects the large reduction in capital expenditures during fiscal

2008, and the relatively low amount of capital expenditures during fiscal 2009 relative to prior periods as well as the related decline in the store count during those periods. The decrease in depreciation as a percentage of total revenue was also impacted by lease extensions for store locations in which the majority of fixed assets are fully depreciated.

     Income tax expense. Income tax expense was 37.3% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2010 as compared to 26.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2009. This fiscal 2010 income tax expense included a net benefit of $0.8 million related to an adjustment to the Company’s prior year income tax provision, partially offset by an adjustment to the state tax rate applied to the Company’s deferred tax assets. The most significant reconciling item between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate of 35% during fiscal 2009 was the reversal of $5.4 million of the valuation allowance previously established against deferred tax assets primarily related to net operating losses generated in fiscal 2007. We were able to reverse the amounts of the previously established valuation allowance as we achieved positive operating performance in fiscal 2009. At January 30, 2010, there was no remaining valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

     Net income. As a result of the foregoing, we reported net income of $26.4 million, or $1.28 per diluted share for fiscal 2010 compared to net income of $34.6 million, or $1.71 per diluted share for fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008

     Results of operations. The table below sets forth selected results of our operations both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:

		Fiscal 2009								Fiscal 2008								Change
		$				%				$				%				$				%
Net sales		$	405,676				99.9	%		$	390,640				99.8	%		$	15,036				3.8	%
Gift card breakage revenue			518				0.1	%			637				0.2	%			(119	)			(18.7	)%
Total revenue			406,194				100.0	%			391,277				100.0	%			14,917				3.8	%
Cost of sales			237,688				58.5	%			257,286				65.8	%			(19,598	)			(7.6	)%
Gross profit			168,506				41.5	%			133,991				34.2	%			34,515				25.8	%
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits			71,300				17.6	%			69,508				17.8	%			1,792				2.6	%
Other operating expenses			35,763				8.8	%			35,721				9.1	%			43				0.1	%
Impairment charge			—				0.0	%			352				0.1	%			(352	)			(100.0	)%
Depreciation			14,505				3.6	%			18,741				4.8	%			(4,236	)			(22.6	)%
Operating income			46,938				11.6	%			9,669				2.5	%			37,269				385.4	%
Interest expense, net			209				0.1	%			50				0.0	%			159				318.0	%
Other income, net			(256	)			(0.1	)%			(469	)			(0.1	)%			213				(45.4	)%
Income before income taxes			46,985				11.6	%			10,088				2.6	%			36,897				365.8	%
Income tax expense			12,415				3.1	%			783				0.2	%			11,632				1485.6	%
Net income		$	34,570				8.5	%		$	9,305				2.4	%		$	25,265				271.5	%

     Net sales. Net sales increased by 3.8% to $405.7 million for fiscal 2009 from $390.6 million for fiscal 2008. The net sales increase in fiscal 2009 resulted primarily from the increase in comparable store sales and average store sales, partially offset by a decrease in store count. We opened 18 new stores in fiscal 2009 and 3 new stores in fiscal 2008, and we closed 38 stores in fiscal 2009 and 39 stores in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, comparable store sales increased 8.4% as compared to a 3.6% increase in fiscal 2008. The comparable store sales increase accounted for a $29.5 million increase in overall sales, while the net reduction of the store base accounted for a $14.4 million decline in sales. The comparable store sales increase was primarily due to an increase in customer conversion rate coupled with an increase in customer traffic, and an increase in the average ticket. The increase in the average ticket was the result of a higher average retail selling price, partially offset by a decline in items per transaction. Merchandise categories that performed the strongest in fiscal 2009 were wall décor, seasonal, gift/novelty, and frames.

     Gross profit. Gross profit increased $34.5 million, or 25.8%, to $168.5 million for fiscal 2009 from $134.0 million for fiscal 2008. Gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue increased to 41.5% for fiscal 2009, from 34.2% for fiscal 2008. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of total revenue was primarily driven by improved merchandise margins, which increased from 51.0% in fiscal 2008 to 55.2% in fiscal 2009. Merchandise margin is calculated as total revenue minus product cost of sales. Merchandise margin excludes outbound freight, store occupancy and central distribution costs. The increase in merchandise margin was the result of a lower markdown rate, a more productive merchandise assortment, and higher initial markups. Strong sell-through of merchandise resulting from a more compelling merchandise mix led to lower markdown rates. Initial markups increased primarily due to significantly lower ocean freight costs. Store occupancy costs as a percentage of net sales decreased from $45.1 million, or 11.5% of total revenue in fiscal 2008 to $38.0 million, or 9.4% of total revenue in fiscal 2009. This decline resulted from favorable lease renewal or extension terms, comparable store sales leverage and the closure of underperforming stores. Outbound freight costs decreased as a percentage of sales reflecting a decline in diesel costs and leverage from the sales increase. Central distribution expenses declined slightly as a percentage of sales, reflecting leverage from the sales increase.

     Compensation and benefits. Compensation and benefits, including both store and corporate personnel, was $71.3 million, or 17.6% of total revenue, for fiscal 2009, as compared to $69.5 million, or 17.8% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in the compensation and benefits ratio was primarily due to the positive comparable store sales performance. The decrease in the compensation and benefits ratio was offset somewhat by an increase in stock compensation expense.

     Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses, including both store and corporate costs, were $35.6 million, or 8.8% of total revenue, for fiscal 2009 as compared to $35.7 million, or 9.1% of total revenue, for fiscal 2008. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased due to positive comparable store sales performance and the leveraging effect on the fixed components of store and corporate operating expenses. This decrease was slightly offset by higher marketing expenses and professional fees related to information technology projects in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008.

     Depreciation. Depreciation expense was $14.5 million, or 3.6% of total revenue, for fiscal 2009 as compared to $18.7 million, or 4.8% of total revenue, for fiscal 2008. The decrease in depreciation was the result of a smaller store base in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 as well as extensions of certain store leases beyond their initial terms where the related leasehold improvements are generally fully depreciated, the large reduction in capital expenditures during fiscal 2008, and the relatively low amount of capital expenditures during fiscal 2009.

     Income tax expense. Income tax expense was 26.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2009 as compared to 7.8% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2008. The most significant reconciling item between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate of 35% during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was the reversal of $5.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of the valuation allowance previously established against deferred tax assets primarily related to net operating losses generated in fiscal 2007. We were able to reverse these amounts of the previously established valuation allowance as we achieved positive operating performance in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. At January 29, 2011, there was no remaining valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

     Net income. As a result of the foregoing, we reported net income of $34.6 million, or $1.71 per diluted share for fiscal 2009 compared to net income of $9.3 million, or $0.47 per diluted share for fiscal 2008.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures

     “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includes certain financial measures not derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (Non-GAAP measures). The non-GAAP measures are “adjusted net income” and “adjusted earnings per share” and are equal to net income, and earnings per share, as the case may be, excluding adjustments to the Company’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, adjustments related to the prior year tax provision, adjustments to the state tax rate applied to the Company’s deferred tax assets and certain income tax credits related to prior periods. Management uses these financial measures to focus on normalized operations, and believes that it is useful to investors because it enables them to perform more meaningful comparisons of past, present and future operating results. The Company believes that using this information, along with the corresponding GAAP measures, provides for a more complete analysis of the results of operations by fiscal year. Net income and earnings per share, respectively, are the most directly comparable GAAP measures to these non-GAAP measures. Below is a reconciliation of each of these non-GAAP measures to the corresponding most comparable GAAP measure:

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Information

		52 Weeks Ended
		January				January				January				February
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)		29, 2011				30, 2010				31, 2009				2, 2008
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) in accordance with GAAP		$	26,431			$	34,570			$	9,305			$	(25,906	)
Adjustments to income tax expense (benefit)		$	(814	)		$	(5,881	)		$	(3,376	)		$	8,168
Adjusted net income (loss)		$	25,617			$	28,689			$	5,929			$	(17,738	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Diluted EPS in accordance with GAAP		$	1.28			$	1.71			$	0.47				($1.33	)
Adjustments to income tax expense (benefit)		$	(0.04	)		$	(0.29	)		$	(0.17	)		$	0.42

		52 Weeks Ended
		January				January				January				February
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)		29, 2011				30, 2010				31, 2009				2, 2008
Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	1.24			$	1.42			$	0.30				($0.91	)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Our principal capital requirements are for working capital and capital expenditures. Working capital consists mainly of merchandise inventories offset by accounts payable, which typically reach their peak by the end of the third quarter of each fiscal year. Capital expenditures primarily relate to new store openings; existing store expansions, remodels or relocations; and purchases of equipment or information technology assets for our stores, distribution facilities or corporate headquarters. Historically, we have funded our working capital and capital expenditure requirements with internally generated cash and borrowings under our credit facility.

     Cash flows from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $36.7 million, $50.0 million and $29.6 million for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities depends heavily on operating performance, changes in working capital and the timing and amount of payments for income taxes. The decline in the amount of cash from operations from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily due to the year-over-year decline in operating performance, an increase in working capital due to the increase in store count, as well as an increase in income taxes paid. The increase in the amount of cash from operations from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily the result of significantly improved operating performance.

     Cash flows from investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $22.6 million and $10.2 million for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. In fiscal 2008, we recorded $960,000 in cash flow provided by investing activities. In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the amounts of cash used in investing activities consisted principally of capital expenditures related to new store construction and information technology projects. The increase in cash flows used in investing activities from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was the result of an increase in the amount of new store projects combined with the ramp-up in information technology projects. During fiscal 2010, we opened 38 stores compared to 18 stores in fiscal 2009. During 2010, we also completed information technology projects in the e-commerce and finance areas, and launched an initiative to replace our current merchandise management system with new software. During fiscal 2008, we only added 3 new stores, and we sold two corporate assets — our former headquarters building and corporate aircraft — resulting in sale proceeds of $3.7 million.

     Cash flows from financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $0.7 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, respectively. These amounts were comprised of cash received from employees for stock purchases and stock option exercises. During fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, we did not make any draws on our revolving credit facility.

     Revolving credit facility. Effective October 4, 2004, we entered into a five-year senior secured revolving credit facility with a revolving loan limit of up to $45 million. On August 6, 2007, we entered into the First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amendment”) which provided the Company with additional availability under our borrowing base through higher advance rates on eligible inventory. As a result of the Amendment, the aggregate size of the overall credit facility remained unchanged at $45 million, but the term of the facility was extended two years making the new expiration date October 4, 2011. Amounts outstanding under the amended facility, other than First In Last Out (“FILO”) loans, bear interest at a floating rate equal to the 60-day LIBOR rate (0.29% at January 29, 2011) plus 1.25% to 1.50% (depending on the amount of excess availability under the borrowing base). FILO loans, which apply to the first approximate $2 million borrowed at any given time, bear interest at a floating rate equal to the 60-day LIBOR rate plus 2.25% to 2.50% (depending on the amount of excess availability under the borrowing base). Additionally, we pay a quarterly fee to the bank equal to a rate of 0.2% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving line of credit. Borrowings under the facility are collateralized by substantially all of our assets and guaranteed by our subsidiaries. The maximum availability under the credit facility is limited by a borrowing base formula, which consists of a percentage of eligible inventory and receivables less reserves. The facility also contains provisions that could result in changes to the presented terms or the acceleration of maturity. Circumstances that could lead to such changes or acceleration include a material adverse change in the business or an event of default under the credit agreement. The facility has one financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain excess availability under the borrowing base, as defined in the credit agreement, of at least $3.0 million to $4.5 million depending on the size of the borrowing base, at all times.

     As of January 29, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants in the facility and there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, with approximately $25.5 million available for borrowing (net of the availability block as described above).

     At January 29, 2011, our balance of cash and cash equivalents was approximately $91.2 million and the borrowing availability under our facility was $25.5 million (net of the availability block as described above). We did not borrow from our credit facility during fiscal 2010, nor do we expect any borrowings during fiscal 2011. We believe that the combination of our cash balances, line of credit availability and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our planned capital expenditures and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations

     A summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of January 29, 2011 as listed below (in thousands):

		Amount of Commitment per Period
		Total
		Contractual				Less than 1												More than 5
		Obligations				year				1 to 3 years				3 to 5 years				years
Operating leases(1)		$	231,152			$	40,160			$	68,760			$	56,666			$	65,566
Purchase obligations(2)		$	60,990			$	60,990			$	—			$	—			$	—
Construction commitments		$	783			$	783			$	—			$	—			$	—
Total		$	292,925			$	101,933			$	68,760			$	56,666			$	65,566

(1)		These amounts represent future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases.
(2)		Purchase obligations consist entirely of open purchase orders of merchandise inventory as of January 29, 2011; such orders are generally cancelable at the discretion of the Company until the order has been shipped.

Related Party Transactions

     In July 2009, the Company entered into a Vendor Agreement with a related party vendor to purchase merchandise inventory. The vendor is considered a related party because one of its principals is the spouse of the Company’s Vice President of Merchandising. During fiscal 2010, the Company’s purchases from this vendor totaled approximately $20.9 million, or 11% of total merchandise purchases. During fiscal 2009, the Company’s purchases from this vendor totaled approximately $3.5 million, or 2% of total merchandise purchases. Payable amounts outstanding to this vendor were approximately $1.5 million as of January 29, 2011 and $800,000 as of January 30, 2010. The Company’s payable terms with this vendor are consistent with the terms offered by other vendors in the ordinary course of business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

Seasonality and Quarterly Results

     We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience substantial seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating income. We believe this is the general pattern typical of our segment of the retail industry and, as a result, expect that this pattern will continue in the future. Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of other factors, including the timing of new store openings, net sales contributed by new stores, shifts in the timing of certain holidays and competition. Consequently, comparisons between quarters are not necessarily meaningful and the results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of future results.

     Our strongest sales period is the fourth quarter of our fiscal year when we generally realize a disproportionate amount of our net sales and a substantial majority of our operating and net income. In anticipation of the increased sales activity during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, we purchase large amounts of inventory and hire temporary staffing help for our stores. Our operating performance could suffer if net sales were below seasonal norms during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.

     The following table sets forth certain unaudited financial and operating data for Kirkland’s in each fiscal quarter during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. The unaudited quarterly information includes all normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair statement of the information shown.

		Fiscal 2010 Quarter Ended
		May 1,				July 31,				October 30,				January 29,
		2010				2010				2010				2011
Total revenue		$	93,465			$	89,504			$	92,725			$	139,606
Gross profit			40,636				34,822				35,993				59,085
Operating income			10,953				5,064				3,766				22,191
Net income			6,518				3,252				2,279				14,382
Earnings per share:
Basic			0.33				0.16				0.11				0.72
Diluted			0.32				0.16				0.11				0.70
Stores open at end of period			281				286				296				300
Comparable store net sales increase (decrease)			12.6	%			1.0	%			(2.4	)%			(7.9	)%

		Fiscal 2009 Quarter Ended
		May 2,				August 1,				October 31,				January 30,
		2009				2009				2009				2010
Total revenue		$	83,320			$	87,688			$	92,389			$	142,797
Gross profit			32,108				33,473				37,930				64,995
Operating income			4,028				4,776				7,643				30,491
Net income (1)			3,478				3,444				5,570				22,078
Earnings per share:
Basic			0.18				0.18				0.28				1.12
Diluted			0.17				0.17				0.27				1.08
Stores open at end of period			292				291				296				279
Comparable store net sales increase			5.2	%			6.1	%			11.3	%			10.2	%

Inflation

     We do not believe that our operating results have been materially affected by inflation during the preceding three fiscal years. There can be no assurance, however, that our operating results will not be adversely affected by inflation in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of our operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates that affect the reported amounts contained in the financial statements and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies are discussed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Certain judgments and estimates utilized in implementing these accounting policies are likewise discussed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion aggregates the various critical accounting policies addressed throughout the financial statements, the judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under varying conditions and assumptions.

     Inventory valuation — Our inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, net of reserves and allowances, with cost determined using the average cost method with average cost approximating current cost. The carrying value of our inventory is affected by reserves for shrinkage and obsolescence.

     We estimate as a percentage of sales the amount of shrinkage that has occurred between the most recently completed store physical count and the end of the financial reporting period based upon historical physical inventory count results. Management adjusts these estimates based on changes, if any, in the trends yielded by our physical inventory counts, which occur throughout the fiscal year. Historically the variation between our recorded estimates and observed results has been insignificant, and although possible, significant future variation is not expected. If our estimated shrinkage percentage varied by 10% from the amount recorded, the carrying value of inventory would have changed approximately $140,000 as of January 29, 2011.

     We also evaluate the cost of our inventory by category and class of merchandise in relation to the estimated sales price. This evaluation is performed to ensure that we do not carry inventory at a value in excess of the amount we expect to realize upon the sale of the merchandise. Our reserves for excess inventory and inventory obsolescence (in connection with which we reduce merchandise inventory to the lower of cost or market) are also estimated based upon our historical experience of selling goods below cost. Historically, the variation between our estimates to account for excess and obsolete inventory and actual results has been insignificant. As of January 29, 2011, our reserve for obsolescence was $26,000.

     Impairments — In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment”, we evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amounts of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. This review includes the evaluation of individual underperforming retail stores and assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets related to such stores. Future cash flows are projected for the remaining lease life. The key assumptions used to determine the estimated cash flows for these stores include net sales and gross margin performance, payroll and related items, occupancy costs and other costs to operate. If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, the Company records an impairment charge equal to the difference, if any, between the assets’ fair value and carrying value. Based on the estimated fair values of certain long-lived assets, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $352,000 during fiscal 2008.

     We have not made any material changes in our impairment loss assessment methodology in the financial periods presented. Additionally, we do not believe that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.

     Depreciation — Approximately 24% of our assets at January 29, 2011, represent investments in property and equipment. Determining appropriate depreciable lives requires judgments and estimates.

•

We utilize the straight-line method of depreciation and a variety of depreciable lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated over 5 years. Computer software and equipment is depreciated over 3-7 years. Leasehold improvements

			are amortized over the shorter of the useful lives of the assets or the original non-cancelable lease term. Our lease terms typically range from 5 to 10 years.
	•		To the extent we replace or dispose of fixtures or equipment prior to the end of its assigned depreciable life, we could realize a loss or gain on the disposition. To the extent our assets are used beyond their assigned depreciable life, no depreciation expense is being realized. We reassess the depreciable lives in an effort to reduce the risk of significant losses or gains arising from either the disposition of our assets or the utilization of assets with no depreciation charges.

     Insurance reserves — Workers’ compensation, general liability and employee medical insurance programs are partially self-insured. It is our policy to record a self-insurance liability using estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported or paid, based on historical claims experience and trends. As of January 29, 2011, our self-insurance reserve estimates totaled $3.1 million, of which $700,000 was reflected as a current liability in accrued expenses and $2.4 million was reflected as a noncurrent liability in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. As of January 30, 2010, $800,000 was reflected as a current liability in accrued expenses and $2.6 million was reflected as a noncurrent liability in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The assumptions made by management in estimating our self-insurance reserves include consideration of historical cost experience, judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim and retention levels. We utilize various methods, including analyses of historical trends and actuarial methods, to estimate the cost to settle reported claims, and claims incurred, but not yet reported. As we obtain additional information and refine our methods regarding the assumptions and estimates we use to recognize liabilities incurred, we will adjust our reserves accordingly. In recent years, we have experienced unfavorable claims development, particularly related to workers compensation, and have adjusted our estimates accordingly.

     Actuarial methods are used to develop estimates of the future ultimate claim costs based on the claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. Management believes that the various assumptions developed and actuarial methods used to determine our self-insurance reserves are reasonable and provide meaningful data and information that management uses to make its best estimate of our exposure to these risks. Arriving at these estimates, however, requires a significant amount of subjective judgment by management; and, as a result, these estimates are uncertain and our actual exposure may be different from our estimates. For example, changes in our assumptions about health care costs, the severity of accidents, the average size of claims and other factors could cause actual claim costs to vary materially from our assumptions and estimates, causing our reserves to be understated or overstated. For instance, a 10% change in our self-insurance liability would have affected net income by approximately $310,000 for fiscal 2010.

     Income taxes — We record income tax liabilities utilizing known obligations and estimates of potential obligations. A deferred tax asset or liability is recognized whenever there are future tax effects from existing temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the balance that is more likely than not to be realized. We must make estimates and judgments on future taxable income, considering feasible tax planning strategies and taking into account existing facts and circumstances, to determine the proper valuation allowance. When we determine that deferred tax assets could be realized in greater or lesser amounts than recorded, the asset balance and income statement reflects the change in the period such determination is made. Due to changes in facts and circumstances and the estimates and judgments that are involved in determining the proper valuation allowance, differences between actual future events and prior estimates and judgments could result in adjustments to this valuation allowance. We use an estimate of our annual effective tax rate at each interim period based on the facts and circumstances available at that time while the actual effective tax rate is calculated at year-end. During fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, as a result of generating positive operating performance, we were able to reverse $5.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of previously established valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. At January 30, 2010, there was no remaining valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

     Additionally, our income tax returns are periodically audited by U.S. federal and state tax authorities which include questions regarding our tax filing positions including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the tax exposures associated with our filing positions, we record reserves for probable exposures. We adjust our tax contingencies reserve and income tax provision in the period in which actual results of a settlement with tax authorities differs from our established reserve, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant tax authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. Our tax contingencies reserve contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions and whether or not the minimum requirements for recognition of tax benefits have been met. We do not believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the reserves established for tax benefits not recognized. Although we believe our judgments and estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our unrecognized tax benefit reserve at January 29, 2011 would have affected net earnings by approximately $54,000 in fiscal 2010.

     Stock-based compensation — We have stock-based compensation plans which include incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units, and an employee stock purchase plan. See Note 7, Employee Benefit Plans, to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. We recognize stock-based compensation expense based on the fair

value of the respective awards. We estimated the fair value of our stock option awards as of the grant date based upon a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock units as of the grant date utilizing the average market price of our stock on that date. The compensation expense associated with these awards is recorded in the consolidated statements of income with a corresponding credit to common stock.

     The Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their stock options before exercising them (“expected term”), the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term and the number of options that will ultimately not complete their vesting requirements (“forfeitures”). Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

     We update our assumptions at each grant date. Historically, there have not been significant changes in our estimates or assumptions used to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, in fiscal 2010, we did experience a significant increase in the estimated fair value of awards granted ($11.30 per share in 2010 compared to $5.29 per share in 2009) because of the increase in our stock price during 2010 when compared to previous years and the related impact to the computation of fair value. Consequently, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material. A 10% change in our stock-based compensation expense for the year ended January 29, 2011, would have affected net earnings by approximately $0.3 million.

Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

     As of January 29, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We did not borrow from our credit facility during fiscal 2010, nor do we expect any borrowings during fiscal 2011.

     We were not engaged in any foreign exchange contracts, hedges, interest rate swaps, derivatives or other financial instruments with significant market risk as of January 29, 2011.

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     The financial statements and schedules are listed under Item 15(a) and filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

     The supplementary financial data is set forth under Item 7 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     None

Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of January 29, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 29, 2011.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a and 15d- 15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011 based on the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 29, 2011. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, as stated in their

report which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.		Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

     Information concerning directors, appearing under the caption “Board of Directors” in our Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on June 1, 2011; information concerning executive officers, appearing under the caption “Item 1. Business — Executive Officers of Kirkland’s” in Part I of this annual report on Form 10-K; information concerning our nominating and audit committees, appearing under the caption “Information About the Board of Directors” in our Proxy Statements; and information under the caption “Other Matters — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 10.

     The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which has been posted on the “Investor Relations” section of our web site. We intend to satisfy the amendment and waiver disclosure requirements under applicable securities regulations by posting any amendments of, or waivers to, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our web site.

Item 11.		Executive Compensation

     The information contained in the sections titled “Executive Compensation” and “Information About the Board of Directors — Board of Directors Compensation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 11.

Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     The information contained in the section titled “Security Ownership of Kirkland’s — Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” in the Proxy Statement, with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 12.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

(c)

Number of securities

(a)

(b)

remaining available for

Number of securities to

Weighted-average

future issuance under equity

be issued upon exercise of

exercise price of

compensation plans

outstanding options,

Outstanding options,

(excluding securities

Plan category

warrants and rights

warrants and rights

reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

1,807,818

$

9.78

1,094,430

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—

—

—

Total

1,807,818

$

9.78

1,094,430

Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     Information contained in the section titled “Related Party Transactions” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 13.

     The information contained in the section titled “Information About the Board of Directors — Independence” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 13.

Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     The information contained in the section titled “Other Matters- Audit Fees” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 14.

PART IV

Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     (a) 1. Financial Statements

     The financial statements set forth below are filed on the indicated pages as part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			33
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010			35
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			36
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			37
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009			38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			39

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Kirkland’s, Inc.

     We have audited Kirkland’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Kirkland’s, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

     We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

     In our opinion, Kirkland’s, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.

     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Kirkland’s, Inc. as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 29, 2011, of Kirkland’s, Inc. and our report dated April 14, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
April 14, 2011

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Kirkland’s, Inc.

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kirkland’s, Inc. as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 29, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Kirkland’s, Inc. as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 29, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

     We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Kirkland’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 14, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
April 14, 2011

KIRKLAND’S, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

		January 29, 2011				January 30, 2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	91,222			$	76,412
Inventories, net			44,452				39,355
Deferred income taxes			3,528				3,552
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			7,468				4,331
Total current assets			146,670				123,650
Property and equipment, net			46,231				36,856
Non-current deferred income taxes			1,440				4,395
Other assets			736				640
Total assets		$	195,077			$	165,541
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	20,236			$	15,589
Income taxes payable			1,289				7,087
Accrued expenses			24,364				25,402
Total current liabilities			45,889				48,078
Deferred rent			27,259				25,399
Other liabilities			3,640				3,579
Total liabilities			76,788				77,056
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)			—				—
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at January 29, 2011, and January 30, 2010			—				—
Common stock, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 19,910,963 and 19,749,148 shares issued and outstanding at January 29, 2011, and January 30, 2010, respectively			146,747				143,374
Accumulated deficit			(28,458	)			(54,889	)
Total shareholders’ equity			118,289				88,485
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	195,077			$	165,541

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

KIRKLAND’S, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

		52 Weeks Ended
		January 29, 2011				January 30, 2010				January 31, 2009
Net sales		$	414,719			$	405,676			$	390,640
Gift card breakage revenue			581				518				637
Total revenue			415,300				406,194				391,277
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation as shown below)			244,764				237,688				257,286
Gross profit			170,536				168,506				133,991
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits			74,799				71,300				69,508
Other operating expenses			40,946				35,763				35,721
Impairment charges			—				—				352
Depreciation			12,817				14,505				18,741
Total operating expenses			128,562				121,568				124,322
Operating income			41,974				46,938				9,669
Interest expense			137				209				123
Interest income			(80	)			—				(73	)
Other income, net			(251	)			(256	)			(469	)
Income before income taxes			42,168				46,985				10,088
Income tax expense			15,737				12,415				783
Net income		$	26,431			$	34,570			$	9,305
Earnings per share:
Basic		$	1.33			$	1.76			$	0.47
Diluted		$	1.28			$	1.71			$	0.47
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share			19,855				19,696				19,628
Effect of dilutive stock equivalents			723				553				63
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share			20,578				20,249				19,691

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

KIRKLAND’S, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

														Total
		Common Stock								Accumulated				Shareholders’
		Shares				Amount				Deficit				Equity
		(In thousands, except share data)
Balance at February 2, 2008			19,585,093			$	141,334			$	(98,764	)		$	42,570
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases			68,177				103								103
Stock-based compensation expense											373				373
Net income											9,305				9,305
Balance at January 31, 2009			19,653,270				141,810				(89,459	)			52,351
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases			95,878				241								241
Stock-based compensation expense											1,323				1,323
Net income											34,570				34,570
Balance at January 30, 2010			19,749,148				143,374				(54,889	)			88,485
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases			161,815				706								706
Stock-based compensation expense											2,667				2,667
Net income											26,431				26,431
Balance at January 29, 2011			19,910,963			$	146,747			$	(28,458	)		$	118,289

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

KIRKLAND’S, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS