Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-53644
Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| Maryland | 32-0211624 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694
(Address of principal executive offices)
(877) 327-3485
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
| None | None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large Accelerated Filer ¨ | Accelerated Filer ¨ | Non-Accelerated Filer x | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $219,150,000 assuming a market value of $10 per share, as of June 30, 2010.
As of March 25, 2011, there were 29,056,340 outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Registrant incorporates by reference in Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Form 10-K portions of its Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., other than historical facts, may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and provide distributions to stockholders, and our ability to find suitable investment properties, may be significantly hindered.
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
1
Table of Contents
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
Overview
Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., a Maryland Corporation (the “Company”), was formed on August 14, 2007 for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in self storage facilities. The Company made an election to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2008. As used in this report, “we” “us” and “our” refer to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.
We are currently offering a maximum of 110,000,000 shares of common stock, consisting of 100,000,000 shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”).
On March 17, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared our registration statement effective. On May 22, 2008, we satisfied the minimum offering requirements of the Primary Offering and commenced formal operations. As of December 31, 2010, including shares sold through our distribution reinvestment plan, we had sold approximately 20.9 million shares of our common stock for gross offering proceeds of approximately $207.7 million. We intend to invest a substantial amount of the net proceeds from the Offering primarily in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments. We may continue to sell shares in the Offering until the earlier of 180 days after the third anniversary of the effective date of the Offering, September 17, 2011, or the effective date of the registration statement for our follow-on offering (SEC Registration No. 333-168905), which we initially filed with the SEC on August 17, 2010. We also reserve the right to terminate the Offering at any time.
As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned 45 self storage facilities located in 15 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia) and Canada comprising approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million rentable square feet. Of the 45 properties we wholly-owned as of December 31, 2010, 19 were acquired during 2010. We also had interests in 19 additional self storage facilities through preferred equity and/or minority interests. Additionally, we have an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
Strategic Storage Operating Partnership, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”) was formed on August 14, 2007. Our Operating Partnership owns, directly or indirectly through one or more special purpose entities, all of the self storage properties that we have acquired. As of December 31, 2010, we owned all of the general partnership units and 99.92% of the limited partnership units of our Operating Partnership and our advisor owned 0.08% of the limited partnership units.
Strategic Capital Holdings, LLC (our “Sponsor”), is the sponsor of our Offering. Our Sponsor was formed on July 21, 2004 to engage in private structured offerings of limited partnerships and other entities with respect to the acquisition, management and disposition of commercial real estate assets. Our Sponsor owns a majority of Strategic Storage Holdings, LLC, which is the sole member of our advisor, Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC (our “Advisor”), and our property manager, Strategic Storage Property Management, LLC (our “Property Manager”).
We have no paid employees. Our Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf under the terms of an advisory agreement with our Advisor. Our Advisor was formed on August 13, 2007.
2
Table of Contents
Our Property Manager was organized in August 2007 to manage our properties. Our Property Manager derives substantially all of its income from the property management services it performs for us. Our Property Manager may enter into sub-property management agreements with third party management companies and pay part of its management fee to such sub-Property Manager.
Investment Objectives
Overview
We will invest a substantial amount of the net proceeds of the Offering in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments. In the event we raise the maximum offering from our Primary Offering, we anticipate that approximately 88.25% of our gross offering proceeds will be used to primarily make investments in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments and pay real estate-related acquisition fees and acquisition expenses, while the remaining 11.75% will be used to pay sales commissions, dealer manager fees and other offering expenses. We may also use net offering proceeds to pay down debt or make distributions if our cash flows from operations are insufficient. Our investment objectives, strategy and policies may be amended or changed at any time by our board of directors. Although we have no plans at this time to change any of our investment objectives, our board of directors may change any and all such investment objectives, including our focus on self storage facilities, if our board believes such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, we may invest in real estate properties other than self storage facilities if our board deems such investments to be in the best interests of our stockholders. We cannot assure our stockholders that our policies or investment objectives will be attained or that the value of our common stock will not decrease.
Primary Investment Objectives
Our primary investment objectives are to:
| • | invest in income-producing real property in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes; |
| • | provide regular cash distributions to our stockholders; |
| • | preserve and protect our stockholders’ invested capital; and |
| • | achieve appreciation in the value of our properties over the long term. |
We cannot assure our stockholders that we will attain these primary investment objectives.
Exchange Listing and Other Liquidity Events
Our board will determine when, and if, to apply to have our shares of common stock listed for trading on a national securities exchange subject to satisfying then-existing applicable listing requirements. Subject to then-existing market conditions and the sole discretion of our board of directors, we intend to seek one or more of the following liquidity events within three to five years after completion of our follow-on offering:
| • | list our shares on a national securities exchange; |
| • | merge, reorganize or otherwise transfer our company or its assets to another entity with listed securities; |
| • | commence the sale of all of our properties and liquidate our company; or |
| • | otherwise create a liquidity event for our stockholders. |
3
Table of Contents
However, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will achieve one or more of the above-described liquidity events within the time frame contemplated or at all. This time frame represents our best faith estimate of the time necessary to build a portfolio sufficient enough to effectuate one of the liquidity events listed above. Our board of directors has the sole discretion to continue operations beyond five years after completion of the Offering if it deems such continuation to be in the best interests of our stockholders. Even if we do accomplish one or more of these liquidity events, we cannot guarantee that a public market will develop for the securities listed or that such securities will trade at a price higher than what our stockholders paid for their shares in our Offering. At the time it becomes necessary for our board of directors to determine which liquidity event, if any, is in the best interests of us and our stockholders, we expect that the board will take all relevant factors at that time into consideration when making a liquidity event decision. We expect that the board will consider various factors including, but not limited to, costs and expenses related to each possible liquidity event and the potential subordinated fees paid to our Advisor.
Our Self Storage Acquisition Strategy
We will focus on the acquisition, ownership, operation and development of self storage facilities and activities relating to this type of property. Self storage refers to properties that offer do-it-yourself, month-to-month storage space rental for personal or business use. According to the Self Storage Association’s Self Storage Industry Fact Sheet, the self storage industry in the United States consists of approximately 2.22 billion rentable square feet at approximately 50,000 facilities (where self storage is the primary source of revenue). The industry is highly fragmented, comprised mainly of local operators and a few national owners and operators, including, we believe, only four publicly traded self storage REITs. See “The Self Storage Industry” for more details regarding the self storage industry in general. We believe the following factors will allow us to achieve market penetration, name recognition and national brand awareness and loyalty in the self storage industry, which will result in greater economies of scale:
| • | the size and diversification of our self storage portfolio, which, as of December 31, 2010, consisted of 45 properties in 15 states and Canada with approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million square feet; |
| • | the management team of our Advisor and Property Manager which, in addition to our executive officers, includes regional and district property management professionals and on-site property management personnel; and |
| • | our self storage branding strategy whereby we intend to re-brand every self storage facility under the “SmartStopSM Self Storage” brand over the next several years and the roll-out of the new customer-friendly self storage website www.smartstopselfstorage.com, which allows potential self storage customers to locate available units at any of our properties. |
We intend to focus on pursuing acquisitions of self storage facilities in markets with varying economic and demographic characteristics, including large urban cities, densely populated suburban cities and smaller rural cities, as long as the property meets our acquisition criteria. We also intend to expand and develop certain facilities we purchase in order to capitalize on underutilization and excess demand. The development of certain facilities we purchase may include an expansion of the self storage units or the services and ancillary products offered as well as making units available for office space. However, future investments will not be limited to any geographic area, to a type of facility or to a specified percentage of our total assets. We may invest a portion of the net proceeds we raise in self storage facilities outside the United States. We will strategically invest in specific domestic or foreign markets when opportunities that meet our investment criteria are available. In general, when evaluating potential
4
Table of Contents
acquisitions of self storage facilities, the primary factor we will consider is the property’s current and projected cash flow.
General Acquisition and Investment Policies
While we intend to focus our investment strategy on self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments, we may invest in other storage-related investments such as storage facilities for automobiles, recreation vehicles and boats. We may additionally invest in other types of commercial real estate properties if our board of directors deems appropriate; however, we have no current intention of investing more than 20% of the net proceeds of the Offering in such other commercial real estate properties. We will seek to make investments that will satisfy the primary investment objective of providing regular cash distributions to our stockholders. However, because a significant factor in the valuation of income-producing real property is its potential for future appreciation, we anticipate that some properties we acquire may have the potential for both growth in value and for providing regular cash distributions to our stockholders.
Our Advisor will have substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific properties. However, each acquisition will be approved by our board of directors. The consideration paid for a property will ordinarily be based on the fair market value of the property as determined by a majority of our board of directors. In selecting a potential property for acquisition, we and our Advisor will consider a number of factors, including but not limited to the following:
| • | projected demand for self storage facilities in the area; |
| • | a property’s geographic location and type; |
| • | a property’s physical location in relation to population density, traffic counts and access; |
| • | construction quality and condition; |
| • | potential for capital appreciation; |
| • | proposed purchase price, terms and conditions; |
| • | historical financial performance; |
| • | rental rates and occupancy levels for the property and competing properties in the area; |
| • | potential for rent increases; |
| • | demographics of the area; |
| • | operating expenses being incurred and expected to be incurred, including but not limited to property taxes and insurance costs; |
| • | potential capital improvements and reserves required to maintain the property; |
| • | prospects for liquidity through sale, financing or refinancing of the property; |
| • | potential competitors for expanding the physical layout of the property; |
| • | the potential for the construction of new properties in the area; |
| • | treatment under applicable federal, state and local tax and other laws and regulations; |
| • | evaluation of title and obtaining of satisfactory title insurance; and |
| • | evaluation of any reasonably ascertainable risks such as environmental contamination. |
5
Table of Contents
There is no limitation on the number, size or type of properties that we may acquire or on the percentage of net offering proceeds that may be invested in any particular property type or single property. The number and mix of properties will depend upon real estate market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time of acquisition and the amount of proceeds raised in the Offering. In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may obtain an option on such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, is normally surrendered if the property is not purchased and may or may not be credited against the purchase price if the property is ultimately purchased.
Our Borrowing Strategy and Policies
As of December 31, 2010, our leverage was 39%. In light of the current debt and interest rate environment, we intend to use low leverage (less than 50%) to make our investments during the Offering. However, at certain times during the Offering, our debt leverage levels may be temporarily higher as we acquire properties in advance of funds being raised in the Offering. Our board of directors will regularly monitor our investment pipeline in relation to our projected fundraising efforts and otherwise evaluate market conditions related to our debt leverage ratios throughout the Offering.
We may incur our indebtedness in the form of bank borrowings, purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties and publicly or privately-placed debt instruments or financing from institutional investors or other lenders. We may obtain a credit facility or separate loans for each acquisition. Our indebtedness may be unsecured or may be secured by mortgages or other interests in our properties. We may use borrowing proceeds to finance acquisitions of new properties, to pay for capital improvements, repairs or buildouts, to refinance existing indebtedness, to pay distributions, to fund redemptions of our shares or to provide working capital.
There is no limitation on the amount we can borrow for the purchase of any property. Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, must be reasonable in relation to our net assets and must be reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. Our charter limits our borrowing to 300% of our net assets (approximately 75% of the cost of our assets, as defined) unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report, with a justification for such excess.
We may borrow amounts from our Advisor or its affiliates only if such loan is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, as fair, competitive, commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties under the circumstances.
Except as set forth in our charter regarding debt limits, we may re-evaluate and change our debt strategy and policies in the future without a stockholder vote. Factors that we could consider when re-evaluating or changing our debt strategy and policies include then-current economic and market conditions, the relative cost of debt and equity capital, any acquisition opportunities, the ability of our properties to generate sufficient cash flow to cover debt service requirements and other similar factors. Further, we may increase or decrease our ratio of debt to equity in connection with any change of our borrowing policies.
Acquisition Structure
Although we are not limited as to the form our investments may take, our investments in real estate will generally constitute acquiring fee title or interests in joint ventures or similar entities that own and operate real estate. We may also enter into the following types of leases relating to real property:
6
Table of Contents
| • | a ground lease in which we enter into a long-term lease (generally greater than 30 years) with the owner for use of the property during the term whereby the owner retains title to the land; or |
| • | a master lease in which we enter into a long-term lease (typically ten years with multiple renewal options) with the owner in which we agree to pay rent to the owner and pay all costs of operating and maintaining the property (a net lease) and typically have an option to purchase the property in the future. |
We will make acquisitions of our real estate investments directly or indirectly through our Operating Partnership. We will acquire interests in real estate either directly through our Operating Partnership or indirectly through limited liability companies or limited partnerships, or through investments in joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with other owners of properties, affiliates of our Advisor or other persons.
Conditions to Closing Acquisitions
We will not purchase any property unless and until we obtain at least a Phase I environmental assessment and history for each property purchased and we are sufficiently satisfied with the property’s environmental status. In addition, we will generally condition our obligation to close the purchase of any investment on the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or other independent professionals, including but not limited to, where appropriate:
| • | property surveys and site audits; |
| • | building plans and specifications, if available; |
| • | soil reports, seismic studies, flood zone studies, if available; |
| • | licenses, permits, maps and governmental approvals; |
| • | historical financial statements and tax statement summaries of the properties; |
| • | proof of marketable title, subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to us; and |
| • | liability and title insurance policies. |
Joint Venture Investments
As of December 31, 2010, we had entered into several joint venture arrangements (see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report). In the future we may acquire some of our properties in joint ventures, some of which may be entered into with affiliates of our Advisor. We may also enter into joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of owning and leasing real properties. Among other reasons, we may want to acquire properties through a joint venture with third parties or affiliates in order to diversify our portfolio of properties in terms of geographic region or property type or to co-invest with one of our property management partners. Joint ventures may also allow us to acquire an interest in a property without requiring that we fund the entire purchase price. In addition, certain properties may be available to us only through joint ventures. In determining whether to recommend a particular joint venture, our Advisor will evaluate the real property which such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this annual report.
7
Table of Contents
We may enter into joint ventures with affiliates of our Advisor for the acquisition of properties, but only provided that:
| • | a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us; and |
| • | the investment by us and such affiliate are on substantially the same terms and conditions. |
To the extent possible and if approved by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, we will attempt to obtain a right of first refusal or option to buy if such venture partner elects to sell its interest in the property held by the joint venture. In the event that the venture partner were to elect to sell property held in any such joint venture, however, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise our right of first refusal to buy the venture partner’s interest in the property held by the joint venture. Entering into joint ventures with affiliates of our Advisor will result in certain conflicts of interest.
Co-Investment with Tenant-In-Common Programs and Delaware Statutory Trusts
Persons selling real estate held for investment often seek to reinvest the proceeds of that sale in another real estate investment in an effort to obtain favorable tax treatment under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Strategic Capital Holdings, LLC, our Sponsor, is a sponsor of tenant-in-common programs and Delaware Statutory Trusts (“DSTs”), and regularly facilitates these transactions, referred to as like-kind exchanges.
For each tenant-in-common program, our Sponsor or one of its affiliates will create a single member limited liability company (each of which we refer to as a Strategic Capital Exchange Entity). A Strategic Capital Exchange Entity will acquire all or part of a real estate property to be owned in co-tenancy arrangements with persons wishing to engage in like-kind exchanges (tenant-in-common participants). Generally, a Strategic Capital Exchange Entity will acquire the subject property, and through a registered broker-dealer, market a private placement memorandum for the sale of co-tenancy interests in that property. In many instances, affiliates of our Advisor will sell or contribute a property to a Strategic Capital Exchange Entity for the purpose of selling off the property. Properties acquired in connection with the tenant-in-common program, if any, initially may be partially or entirely financed with debt. When a tenant-in-common participant wishes to acquire a co-tenancy interest, the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity will deed an undivided co-tenancy interest in the subject property to a newly formed single-member limited liability company that is owned by the tenant-in-common participant.
A DST is a separate legal entity created as a trust under Delaware law that allows persons wishing to engage in like-kind exchanges to reinvest their proceeds in commercial real estate. The DST acquires title to the property or properties and borrows money from the lender secured by such properties. The exchange participant owns a beneficial interest in the DST.
On September 24, 2009, we closed on two mergers with REIT I and REIT II, two private real estate investments trusts sponsored by our Sponsor (“Merger Transactions”). In connection with the Merger Transactions we acquired minority interests in several DSTs affiliated with our Sponsor. In 2010, we increased our investment in two such DSTs. (See Notes 2 and 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report). We may in the future invest in other similar programs or increase our ownership position in a DST in which we already have an ownership interest, but will only do so if our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, determines that our participation or increase in ownership is in the best interest of our stockholders. In the event that our
8
Table of Contents
board of directors determines that it is in our best interest to so participate, we may co-invest in the property or DST.
We may co-invest in a property or DST only if a majority of our directors not otherwise interested in the transaction and a majority of our independent directors approves of the transaction as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable to us. We anticipate that in the event we purchase a tenant-in-common or DST interest from a Strategic Capital Exchange Entity, generally we will purchase the interest at the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity’s cost (before offering expenses and fees). However, if the price to us is in excess of the cost paid by our affiliate for the asset, a majority of our directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, including a majority of our independent directors, must determine that substantial justification for such excess exists and that such excess is reasonable. In no event shall the cost of such asset to us exceed the greater of the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity’s cost or the current appraised value for the property or DST interest as determined by an independent appraiser. Although the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity will charge fees and expenses to tenant-in-common participants and/or will sell the tenant-in-common or DST interests at a price above the price it paid for the property, we will not pay any fees or expenses to the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity. We intend however, to pay our Advisor the acquisition fees and reimburse our Advisor for its expenses to the same extent as with other types of property acquisitions.
All purchasers of co-tenancy interests, including our Operating Partnership if it purchases co-tenancy interests, will be required to execute a tenant-in-common agreement with the other purchasers of co-tenancy interests in that particular property. For a DST investment, each investor is required to execute a trust agreement. If we purchase these co-ownership interests, we will be subject to various risks associated with co-ownership arrangements which are not otherwise present in real estate investments, such as the risk that the interests of the non-affiliated investors will become adverse to our interests.
In any co-ownership arrangement, our Sponsor, the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity, or the other investors may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. For instance, our Sponsor will receive substantial fees in connection with its sponsoring of a co-ownership arrangement (although we will not be required to pay such fees) and our participation in such a transaction likely would facilitate its consummation. For these reasons, our Advisor may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interest of our Sponsor or the Strategic Capital Exchange Entity. As a result, agreements and transactions between the parties with respect to the property will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.
Construction and Development Activities
As of December 31, 2010, we had not undertaken any construction or development activities; however, subsequent to December 31, 2010 we acquired an industrial building in Canada, which we intend to convert into a self storage facility and have subsequently initiated development thereon. From time to time, we may construct and develop real estate assets or render services in connection with these activities. We may be able to reduce overall purchase costs by constructing and developing a property versus purchasing a completed property. Developing and constructing properties would, however, expose us to risks such as cost overruns, carrying costs of projects under construction or development, availability and costs of materials and labor, weather conditions and government regulation. To comply with the applicable requirements under federal income tax law, we intend to limit our construction and development activities to performing oversight and review functions, including reviewing the construction design proposals, negotiating and contracting for feasibility studies and supervising compliance with local, state or federal laws and regulations, negotiating contracts, overseeing construction, and obtaining financing. In addition, we may use “taxable REIT subsidiaries” or certain
9
Table of Contents
independent contractors to carry out these oversight and review functions. We will retain independent contractors to perform the actual construction work.
Government Regulations
Our business will be subject to many laws and governmental regulations. Changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and courts, occur frequently.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all public accommodations and commercial facilities are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. Complying with the ADA requirements could require us to remove access barriers. Failing to comply could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or an award of damages to private litigants. Although we intend to acquire properties that substantially comply with these requirements, we may incur additional costs to comply with the ADA. In addition, a number of additional federal, state and local laws may require us to modify any properties we purchase, or may restrict further renovations thereof, with respect to access by disabled persons. Additional legislation could impose financial obligations or restrictions with respect to access by disabled persons. Although we believe that these costs will not have a material adverse effect on us, if required changes involve a greater amount of expenditures than we currently anticipate, our ability to make expected distributions could be adversely affected.
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be held liable for the costs of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances. These laws often impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator was responsible for, or even knew of, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigating, removing or remediating these substances may be substantial, and the presence of these substances may adversely affect our ability to rent units or sell the property or to borrow using the property as collateral and may expose us to liability resulting from any release of or exposure to these substances. If we arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at another location, we may be liable for the costs of removing or remediating these substances at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by us. We may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site that we own or operate. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, pursuant to which third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials and other hazardous or toxic substances.
Other Regulations
The properties we acquire likely will be subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as zoning and state and local fire and life safety requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or awards of damages to private litigants. We intend to acquire properties that are in material compliance with all such regulatory requirements. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that these requirements will not be changed or that new requirements will not be imposed which would require significant unanticipated expenditures by us and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
10
Table of Contents
Disposition Policies
As of December 31, 2010, we had not disposed of any investments. We generally intend to hold each property we acquire for an extended period. However, we may sell a property at any time if, in our judgment, the sale of the property is in the best interests of our stockholders.
The determination of whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will generally be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, other investment opportunities and considerations specific to the condition, value and financial performance of the property. In connection with our sales of properties, we may lend the purchaser all or a portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale.
We may sell assets to third parties or to affiliates of our Advisor. Our nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors, which is comprised solely of independent directors, must review and approve all transactions between us and our Advisor and its affiliates.
Investment Limitations in our Charter
Our charter places numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds, most of which are required by various provisions of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts published by the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA REIT Guidelines). So long as our shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, the NASAA REIT Guidelines apply to us, and we will not:
| • | Invest in equity securities unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approve such investment as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable. |
| • | Invest in commodities or commodity futures contracts, except for future contracts when used solely for the purpose of hedging in connection with our ordinary business of investing in real estate assets and mortgages. |
| • | Invest in real estate contracts of sale, otherwise known as land sale contracts, unless the contract is in recordable form and is appropriately recorded in the chain of title. |
| • | Make or invest in mortgage loans unless an appraisal is obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency. In cases where our independent directors determine, and in all cases in which the transaction is with any of our directors or our Advisor and its affiliates, we will obtain an appraisal from an independent appraiser. We will maintain such appraisal in our records for at least five years and it will be available to our stockholders for inspection and duplication. We will also obtain a mortgagee’s or owner’s title insurance policy as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. |
| • | Make or invest in mortgage loans, including construction loans, on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans on such property would exceed an amount equal to 85% of the appraised value of such property, as determined by an appraisal, unless substantial justification exists for exceeding such limit because of the presence of other loan underwriting criteria. |
| • | Make or invest in mortgage loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of any of our directors, our Advisor or their respective affiliates. |
11
Table of Contents
| • | Make investments in unimproved property or indebtedness secured by a deed of trust or mortgage loans on unimproved property in excess of 10% of our total assets. |
| • | Issue equity securities on a deferred payment basis or other similar arrangement. |
| • | Issue debt securities in the absence of adequate cash flow to cover debt service. |
| • | Issue equity securities that are assessable after we have received the consideration for which our board of directors authorized their issuance. |
| • | Issue “redeemable securities” redeemable solely at the option of the holder, which restriction has no effect on our ability to implement our share redemption program. |
| • | When applicable, grant warrants or options to purchase shares to our Advisor or its affiliates or to officers or directors affiliated with our Advisor except on the same terms as options or warrants that are sold to the general public. Further, the amount of the options or warrants cannot exceed an amount equal to 10% of outstanding shares on the date of grant of the warrants and options. |
| • | Lend money to our directors, or to our Advisor or its affiliates, except for certain mortgage loans described above. |
Changes in Investment Policies and Limitations
Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interests of our stockholders. Each determination and the basis therefor is required to be set forth in the applicable meeting minutes. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary as new investment techniques are developed. The methods of implementing our investment objectives and policies, except as otherwise provided in our charter, may be altered by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, without the approval of our stockholders. The determination by our board of directors that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to be qualified as a REIT shall require the concurrence of two-thirds of the board of directors. Investment policies and limitations specifically set forth in our charter, however, may only be amended by a vote of the stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding shares.
Investments in Mortgages
As of December 31, 2010, we had not invested in any mortgages. While we intend to emphasize equity real estate investments and, hence, operate as what is generally referred to as an “equity REIT,” as opposed to a “mortgage REIT,” we may invest in first or second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans secured by an interest in the entity owning the real estate or other similar real estate loans consistent with our REIT status. We may make such loans to developers in connection with construction and redevelopment of self storage facilities. Such mortgages may or may not be insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, the Veterans Benefits Administration or another third party. We may also invest in participating or convertible mortgages if our directors conclude that we and our stockholders may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the subject property. Such mortgages are similar to equity participation.
Affiliate Transaction Policy
On September 24, 2009, we completed the Merger Transactions. (See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report). In connection with the Merger Transactions,
12
Table of Contents
we acquired minority interests in several DSTs affiliated with our Sponsor. In May and November of 2010 we increased our ownership from 3.05% to 19.75% in Self Storage I DST, a DST sponsored by our Sponsor. Subsequent to December 31, 2010 we acquired the remaining interests, such that we owned 100% of the interests as of February 2011.
We may purchase properties from one or more affiliates of our Advisor in the future. Our board of directors has established a nominating and corporate governance committee, which will review and approve all matters the board believes may involve a conflict of interest. This committee is composed solely of independent directors. This committee of our board of directors will approve all transactions between us and our Advisor and its affiliates.
Investment Company Act and Certain Other Policies
We intend to operate in such a manner that we will not be subject to regulation under the 1940 Act. Our Advisor will continually review our investment activity to attempt to ensure that we do not come within the application of the 1940 Act. Among other things, our Advisor will attempt to monitor the proportion of our portfolio that is placed in various investments so that we do not come within the definition of an “investment company” under the 1940 Act. If at any time the character of our investments could cause us to be deemed as an investment company for purposes of the 1940 Act, we will take all necessary actions to attempt to ensure that we are not deemed to be an “investment company.” In addition, we do not intend to underwrite securities of other issuers or actively trade in loans or other investments.
Subject to the restrictions we must follow in order to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we may make investments other than as previously described, although we do not currently intend to do so. We have authority to purchase or otherwise reacquire our common shares or any of our other securities. We have no present intention of repurchasing any of our common shares except pursuant to our share redemption program, and we would only take such action in conformity with applicable federal and state laws and the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Code.
Employees
We have no paid employees. The employees of the Advisor provide management, acquisition, advisory and certain administrative services for us.
Competition
The extent of competition in a market area depends significantly on local market conditions. The primary factors upon which competition in the self storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property’s design and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. We believe we compete successfully on these bases.
Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources then we do. Such competitors may, among other possible advantages, be capable of paying higher prices for acquisitions and obtaining financing on better terms then us.
Industry Segments
We internally evaluate all of our properties and interests therein as one industry segment and, accordingly, we do not report segment information.
13
Table of Contents
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Below are risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our operations that we believe are material to stockholders. Other risks and uncertainties may exist that we do not consider material based on the information currently available to us at this time.
Risks Related to an Investment in Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.
We have a limited operating history and limited established financing sources, and we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be successful in the marketplace.
We were incorporated in August 2007 and commenced active business operations on May 22, 2008. As of December 31, 2010, we owned 45 properties in 15 states and Canada. Our stockholders should consider our prospects in light of the risks uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that are, like us, in their early stage of development.
To be successful in this market, we must, among other things:
| • | identify and acquire investments that further our investment objectives; |
| • | increase awareness of the “Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.” name within the investment products market; |
| • | expand and maintain our network of participating broker-dealers; |
| • | attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations; |
| • | respond to competition for our targeted real estate properties and other investments as well as for potential investors; and |
| • | continue to build and expand our operational structure to support our business. |
We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could cause stockholders to lose a portion of their investment.
The prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of our Advisor may not be an indication of our future results.
Stockholders should not rely upon the past performance of other real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of our Advisor to predict our future results. Although members of our Advisor’s management team have significant experience in the acquisition, finance, management and development of commercial real estate, including self storage properties and REITs, our Offering is the first publicly offered REIT sponsored by our Advisor or its affiliates. Accordingly, the prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by our Advisor and its affiliates may not be indicative of our future results.
We have incurred operating losses to date, have an accumulated deficit and our operations may not be profitable in 2011.
We incurred a net loss of approximately $1.5 million for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our initial year of operations, a net loss of approximately $7.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and a net loss of approximately $12.8 million for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Our accumulated deficits were $1.5 million, $8.8 million and $21.6 million as of December 31, 2008, 2009
14
Table of Contents
and 2010, respectively. Given that we are still early in our fundraising and acquisition stage of development, our operations may not be profitable in 2011.
If we, through our Advisor, are unable to find suitable investments, then we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions is dependent upon the performance of our Advisor in selecting our investments and arranging financing. As of December 31, 2010, we owned 45 properties in 15 states and Canada. Our stockholders will essentially have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments prior to the time we make them. Our stockholders must rely entirely on the management ability of our Advisor and the oversight of our board of directors. We cannot be sure that our Advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if it makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved. If we are unable to find suitable investments, we will hold the proceeds of the Offering in an interest-bearing account or invest the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade investments. In such an event, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders would be adversely affected.
To date, we have paid a majority of our distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations; therefore, we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties, and our stockholders’ overall return may be reduced.
In the event we do not have enough cash from operations to fund our distributions, we may borrow, issue additional securities or sell assets in order to fund the distributions or make the distributions out of net proceeds from the Offering. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies, and we may use an unlimited amount from any source to pay our distributions. Through December 31, 2010, we had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of approximately $207.7 million from the sale of approximately 20.9 million shares in our Offering. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, we funded 100% of our distributions using proceeds from our Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we funded 6.5% of our distributions using cash flow from operations and 93.5% using proceeds from our Offering. If we continue to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations, we will have fewer funds available for acquiring properties, which may reduce our stockholders’ overall returns. Additionally, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock may be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize a capital gain.
We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions and the value of stockholders’ investment.
We could suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, particularly as a result of our reliance on our Advisor at times when management of our Advisor is simultaneously seeking to locate suitable investments for other affiliated programs. Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of income-producing properties are likely to adversely affect our ability to make distributions and may also adversely affect the value of stockholders’ investment. In such event, we may pay all or a substantial portion of our distributions from the proceeds of the Offering or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow, which may constitute a return of stockholders’ capital. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies. We have established no maximum of distributions to be paid from such funds. Distributions from the proceeds of the Offering or from borrowings also could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in properties. This, in turn, would reduce the value of stockholders’ investment. In particular, if we acquire properties prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take
15
Table of Contents
several months to complete construction and rent available storage space. Therefore, our stockholders could suffer delays in the receipt of cash distributions attributable to those particular properties.
If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment objectives could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to make distributions and the value of stockholders’ investment.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain of our executive officers and other key personnel of our Advisor, including H. Michael Schwartz, Paula Mathews, Michael S. McClure, Wayne Johnson, and Robert Cerrone, each of whom would be difficult to replace. Our Advisor does not have an employment agreement with any of these key personnel and we cannot guarantee that all, or any particular one, will remain affiliated with us and/or our Advisor. If any of our key personnel were to cease their affiliation with our Advisor, our operating results could suffer. Further, we do not intend to separately maintain key person life insurance on any of these individuals. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our Advisor’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure our stockholders that our Advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of key personnel or does not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of stockholders’ investment may decline.
Our ability to operate profitably will depend upon the ability of our Advisor to efficiently manage our day-to-day operations and the ability of our Property Manager to effectively manage our properties.
We will rely on our Advisor to manage our business and assets. Our Advisor will make all decisions with respect to our day-to-day operations. In addition, we will rely on our Property Manager to effectively manage our properties. Thus, the success of our business will depend in large part on the ability of our Advisor and Property Manager to manage our operations. Any adversity experienced by our Advisor or our Property Manager or problems in our relationship with our Advisor or Property Manager could adversely impact our operations and, consequently, our cash flow and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We may loan a portion of the proceeds of the Offering to fund the development or purchase of self storage facilities, and we may invest in mortgage or other loans, but if these loans are not fully repaid, the resulting losses could reduce the expected cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of stockholders’ investment.
We will use the net proceeds of the Offering primarily to purchase self storage facilities, to repay debt financing that we may incur when acquiring properties, and to pay real estate commissions, acquisition fees and acquisition expenses relating to the selection and acquisition of properties, including amounts paid to our Advisor and its affiliates. In addition, we may loan a portion of the net offering proceeds to entities developing or acquiring self storage facilities, including affiliates of our Advisor, subject to the limitations in our charter. We may also invest in first or second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans secured by an interest in the entity owning the real estate or other similar real estate loans consistent with our REIT status. We may also invest in participating or convertible mortgages if our directors conclude that we and our stockholders may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the subject property. There can be no assurance that these loans will be repaid to us in part or in full in accordance with the terms of the loan or that we will receive interest payments on the outstanding balance of the loan. We anticipate that these loans will be secured by mortgages on the underlying properties, but in the event of a foreclosure, there can be no assurances that we will recover the outstanding balance of the loan. If there are defaults under these loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying
16
Table of Contents
properties quickly. The resulting time delay and associated costs could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our officers, directors and our Advisor are limited, which could reduce stockholders’ and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.
Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter, in the case of our directors, officers, employees and agents, and the Advisory agreement, in the case of our Advisor, requires us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents, and our Advisor and its affiliates, for actions taken by them in good faith and without negligence or misconduct. Additionally, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents, and our Advisor and its affiliates, than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce stockholders’ and our recovery against them. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents or our Advisor in some cases which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
If we merge with our Advisor, the percentage of our outstanding common stock owned by our other stockholders could be reduced, and we could incur additional costs associated with being self-administered.
In the future, our board of directors may consider internalizing the functions performed for us by our Advisor. One method by which we could internalize these functions would be to merge with our Advisor and issue shares to the Advisor as merger consideration. A merger with our Advisor could result in dilution of stockholders’ interests as a stockholder and could reduce earnings per share and funds from operation per share. Internalization transactions have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims, which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in properties or other investments and to pay distributions. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Our Advisor, Property Manager and their officers and certain of our key personnel will face competing demands relating to their time, and this may cause our operating results to suffer.
Our Advisor, Property Manager and their officers and certain of our key personnel and their respective affiliates are key personnel, advisors, managers and sponsors of other real estate programs having investment objectives and legal and financial obligations similar to ours, and may have other business interests as well. Because these persons have competing demands on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our stockholders’ investments may suffer.
17
Table of Contents
Our officers and one of our directors face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with affiliated entities, which could hinder our ability to successfully implement our investment objectives and to generate returns to our stockholders.
Our executive officers and one of our directors are also officers of our Advisor, our Property Manager, and other affiliated entities. As a result, these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their owners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to our stockholders and us. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment objectives. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (1) allocation of new investments and management time and services between us and the other entities, (2) our purchase of properties from, or sale of properties to, affiliated entities, (3) the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset, (4) development of our properties by affiliates, (5) investments with affiliates of our Advisor, (6) compensation to our Advisor, and (7) our relationship with our Dealer Manager and Property Manager. If we do not successfully implement our investment objectives, we may be unable to generate cash needed to make distributions to our stockholders and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
Our Advisor will face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor, which could adversely affect our investment opportunities.
We may be buying properties at the same time as one or more of the other programs managed by officers and key personnel of our Advisor. Our Advisor and its affiliates are actively involved in 14 other real estate programs (six of which invest in or own self storage properties) that may compete with us or otherwise have similar business interests. Our Advisor and our Property Manager will have conflicts of interest in allocating potential properties, acquisition expenses, management time, services and other functions between various existing enterprises or future enterprises with which they may be or become involved. There is a risk that our Advisor will choose a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by another program sponsored by our Sponsor. We cannot be sure that officers and key personnel acting on behalf of our Advisor and on behalf of these other programs will act in our best interests when deciding whether to allocate any particular property to us. Such conflicts that are not resolved in our favor could result in a reduced level of distributions we may be able to pay to our stockholders and a reduction in the value of stockholders’ investment. If our Advisor or its affiliates breach their legal or other obligations or duties to us, or do not resolve conflicts of interest, we may not meet our investment objectives, which could reduce the expected cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of stockholders’ investment.
We may face a conflict of interest if we purchase properties from affiliates of our Advisor.
On September 24, 2009, we completed the Merger Transactions. In May and November of 2010 we increased our ownership from 3.05% to 19.75% in Self Storage I DST, a DST sponsored by our Sponsor. Subsequent to December 31, 2010 we acquired the remaining interests in Self Storage I DST, such that we owned 100% of the interests as of February 2011. We may purchase properties from one or more affiliates of our Advisor in the future. A conflict of interest may exist if such acquisition occurs. The business interests of our Advisor and its affiliates may be adverse to, or to the detriment of, our interests. Additionally, the prices we pay to affiliates of our Advisor for our properties may be equal to, or in excess of, the prices paid by them plus the costs incurred by them relating to the acquisition and financing of the properties. These prices will not be the subject of arm’s-length negotiations, which could mean that the acquisitions may be on terms less favorable to us than those negotiated in an arm’s-length transaction. Even though we will use an independent third-party appraiser to determine fair market value when acquiring properties from our Advisor and its affiliates, we may pay more for particular properties
18
Table of Contents
than we would have in an arm’s-length transaction, which would reduce our cash available for investment in other properties or distribution to our stockholders. For the Merger Transactions, we obtained a fairness opinion from Robert A. Stanger & Co.
Furthermore, because any agreement that we enter into with affiliates of our Advisor will not be negotiated in an arm’s-length transaction, and as a result of the affiliation between our Advisor and its affiliates, our Advisor may be reluctant to enforce the agreements against such entities. Our nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors approved the Merger Transactions and the acquisition of the remaining interests in Self Storage I DST discussed above and will approve all future transactions between us and our Advisor and its affiliates.
Our Advisor will face conflicts of interest relating to the incentive fee structure under our advisory agreement, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
Pursuant to our advisory agreement, our Advisor and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of our shares and the selection, acquisition and management of our properties. Our Advisor will be entitled to fees that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our Advisor to perform in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. The amount of such compensation has not been determined as a result of arm’s-length negotiations, and such amounts may be greater than otherwise would be payable to independent third parties. However, because our Advisor does not maintain a significant equity interest in us and is entitled to receive substantial minimum compensation regardless of performance, our Advisor’s interests will not be wholly aligned with those of our stockholders. In that regard, our Advisor could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative investments in order for us to generate the specified levels of performance or sales proceeds that would entitle our Advisor to fees. In addition, our Advisor’s entitlement to receive fees upon the sale of our assets and to participate in sale proceeds could result in our Advisor recommending sales of our investments at the earliest possible time at which such sales would produce the level of return that would entitle our Advisor to compensation from the sales, even if continued ownership of those investments might be in our best long-term interest.
Our advisory agreement will require us to pay a performance-based fee to our Advisor in the event that we terminate our Advisor prior to the listing of our shares for trading on an exchange or, absent such listing, in respect of its participation in net sale proceeds. To avoid paying this fee, our independent directors may decide against terminating the advisory agreement prior to our listing of our shares or disposition of our investments even if, but for the performance fee, termination of the Advisory agreement would be in our best interest. In addition, the requirement to pay the fee to our Advisor at termination could cause us to make different investment or disposition decisions than we would otherwise make in order to satisfy our obligation to pay the fee to the terminated Advisor.
At the time it becomes necessary for our board of directors to determine which liquidity event, if any, is in the best interests of us and our stockholders, our Advisor may not agree with the decision of our board as to which liquidity event, if any, we should pursue. If there is a substantial difference in the amount of subordinated fees the Advisor may receive for each liquidity event, our Advisor may prefer a liquidity event with higher subordinated fees. If our board of directors decides to list our shares for trading on an exchange, our board may also decide to merge with our Advisor in anticipation of the listing process. Such merger may result in substantial compensation to the Advisor which may create certain conflicts of interest.
19
Table of Contents
Our Advisor will face conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures that we may form with affiliates of our Advisor, which conflicts could result in a disproportionate benefit to other joint venture partners at our expense.
We may enter into joint ventures with other programs sponsored by our sponsor for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties. Our Advisor may have conflicts of interest in determining which program should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. The co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, our Advisor may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interest of the affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Since our Advisor and its affiliates will control both the affiliated co-venturer and, to a certain extent, us, agreements and transactions between the co-venturers with respect to any such joint venture will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers, which may result in the co-venturer receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive. In addition, we may assume liabilities related to the joint venture that exceed the percentage of our investment in the joint venture, and this could reduce the returns on stockholders’ investment.
There is no separate counsel for us and our affiliates, which could result in conflicts of interest.
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (“Baker Donelson”) acts as legal counsel to us and also represents our sponsor, Advisor and some of their affiliates. There is a possibility in the future that the interests of the various parties may become adverse and, under the code of professional responsibility of the legal profession, Baker Donelson may be precluded from representing any one or all of such parties. If any situation arises in which our interests appear to be in conflict with those of our Advisor or its affiliates, additional counsel may be retained by one or more of the parties to assure that their interests are adequately protected. Moreover, should a conflict of interest not be readily apparent, Baker Donelson may inadvertently act in derogation of the interest of the parties, which could affect our ability to meet our investment objectives.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
The limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover that could otherwise result in a premium price to our stockholders.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% of our outstanding stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain types of entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year. To ensure that we do not fail to qualify as a REIT under this test, our charter restricts ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of any class of our outstanding stock. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that might result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 900,000,000 shares of capital stock. In addition, our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue. Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any
20
Table of Contents
unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have a priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
We will not be afforded the protection of Maryland law relating to business combinations.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
| • | any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s shares; or |
| • | an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. |
These prohibitions are intended to prevent a change of control by interested stockholders who do not have the support of our board of directors. Since our articles of incorporation contain limitations on ownership of 9.8% or more of our common stock, we opted out of the business combinations statute in our charter. Therefore, we will not be afforded the protections of this statute and, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the ownership limitations in our articles of incorporation would provide the same measure of protection as the business combinations statute and prevent an undesired change of control by an interested stockholder.
The investment return of our stockholders may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940; if we become an unregistered investment company, we will not be able to continue our business.
We do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). Currently, our investments in real estate will represent the substantial majority of our total asset mix, which would not subject us to the 1940 Act. In order to maintain an exemption from regulation under the 1940 Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year after the Offering ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of the Offering in properties within one year of the termination of the Offering, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly lower stockholders’ returns.
To maintain compliance with our 1940 Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may be required to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire. If we are required to register as an investment company but fail to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our
21
Table of Contents
contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
Our stockholders are bound by the majority vote on matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote and, therefore, each stockholder’s vote on a particular matter may be superseded by the vote of other stockholders.
Our stockholders may vote on certain matters at any annual or special meeting of stockholders, including the election of directors. However, each stockholder will be bound by the majority vote on matters requiring approval of a majority of the stockholders even if the stockholder does not vote with the majority on any such matter.
If one of our stockholders does not agree with the decisions of our board of directors, the stockholder only has limited control over changes in our policies and operations and may not be able to change such policies and operations, except as provided for in our charter and under applicable law.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding investments, financing, growth, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of our stockholders. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on the following:
| • | the election or removal of directors; |
| • | any amendment of our charter (including a change in our primary investment objectives), except that our board of directors may amend our charter without stockholder approval to increase or decrease the aggregate number of our shares, to increase or decrease the number of our shares of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, or to classify or reclassify any unissued shares by setting or changing the preferences, conversion or other rights, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications or terms and conditions of redemption of such shares, provided however, that any such amendment does not adversely affect the rights, preferences and privileges of the stockholders; |
| • | our liquidation or dissolution; and |
| • | any merger, consolidation or sale or other disposition of substantially all of our assets. |
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors. Therefore, our stockholders are limited in stockholders’ ability to change our policies and operations.
Our board of directors may change any of our investment objectives, including our focus on self storage facilities.
Our board of directors may change any of our investment objectives, including our focus on self storage facilities. If our stockholders do not agree with a decision of our board to change any of our investment objectives, our stockholders only have limited control over such changes. Additionally, we cannot assure our stockholders that we would be successful in attaining any of these investment objectives, which may adversely impact our financial performance and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
22
Table of Contents
We will not calculate the net asset value per share for our shares until 18 months after completion of our last offering; therefore, our stockholders will not be able to determine the net asset value of their shares on an ongoing basis during the Offering.
We do not intend to calculate the net asset value per share for our shares until 18 months after the completion of our last offering. Beginning 18 months after the completion of the last offering of our shares (excluding offerings under our distribution reinvestment plan), our board of directors will determine the value of our properties and our other assets based on such information as our board determines appropriate, which may or may not include independent valuations of our properties or of our enterprise as a whole. We will disclose this net asset value to stockholders in our filings with the SEC. Therefore, our stockholders will not be able to determine the net asset value of their shares on an ongoing basis during the Offering.
Our stockholders’ interests in us will be diluted as we issue additional shares.
Our stockholders will not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may increase the number of authorized shares of stock (currently 900,000,000 shares), increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock designated, or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All such shares may be issued in the discretion of our board of directors. Therefore, as we (1) sell shares in the Offering or sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, (2) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock, (3) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors, (4) issue shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the options granted to our independent directors, (5) issue shares to our Advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation as set forth under our Advisory agreement, or (6) issue shares of our common stock in a merger or to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership, existing stockholders and investors purchasing shares in the Offering will experience dilution of their equity investment in us. Because the limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section, our stockholders should not expect to be able to own a significant percentage of our shares.
Payment of fees to our Advisor and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and distribution.
Our Advisor and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of our shares, the selection and acquisition of our investments, and the management of our properties. They will be paid substantial fees for these services, which will reduce the amount of cash available for investment in properties or distribution to stockholders.
We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.
There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders. During the term of the Offering, distributions will be based principally on distribution expectations of our potential investors and cash available from our operations. The amount of cash available for distribution will be affected by many factors, such as our ability to buy properties as offering proceeds become available, the yields on securities of other real estate programs that we invest in and our
23
Table of Contents
operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. Actual cash available for distribution may vary substantially from estimates. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to pay or maintain distributions or that distributions will increase over time. Nor can we give any assurance that rents from the properties will increase, that the securities we buy will increase in value or provide constant or increased distributions over time, or that future acquisitions of real properties will increase our cash available for distribution to stockholders. Our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of directors in establishing the distribution rate to stockholders.
We are uncertain of our sources of debt or equity for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain funding on acceptable terms, our ability to make necessary capital improvements to our properties may be impaired or delayed.
The gross proceeds of the Offering will be used to purchase real estate investments and to pay various commissions, fees and expenses. In addition, in order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income each year, excluding capital gains. Because of this distribution requirement, it is not likely that we will be able to fund a significant portion of our future capital needs from retained earnings. We have not identified any sources of debt or equity for future funding, and such sources of funding may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may not be able to make necessary capital improvements to our properties, pay other expenses or expand our business.
Risks Related to the Self Storage Industry
Because we are focused on the self storage industry, our rental revenues will be significantly influenced by demand for self storage space generally, and a decrease in such demand would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.
Because our portfolio of properties will consist primarily of self storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. A decrease in the demand for self storage space would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. Demand for self storage space has been and could be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies and changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing self storage facilities in an area. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for self storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue. Any such decrease could impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We do not expect to invest in other real estate or businesses to hedge against the risk that industry trends might decrease the profitability of our self storage-related investments.
We will face significant competition in the self storage industry, which may increase the cost of acquisitions or developments or impede our ability to retain customers or re-let space when existing customers vacate.
We will face intense competition in every market in which we purchase self storage facilities. We will compete with numerous national, regional, and local developers, owners and operators in the self storage industry, including other REITs, some of which own or may in the future own facilities similar to, or in the same markets as, the self storage properties we acquire, and some of which will have greater capital resources, greater cash reserves, less demanding rules governing distributions to stockholders and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire facilities. In addition, due to the low cost of each individual self storage facility, other developers, owners and operators have the capability to build additional facilities that may compete with our facilities. This competition for investments may reduce the number
24
Table of Contents
of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self storage space in certain areas where our facilities are located, all of which may adversely affect our operating results. Additionally, an economic slowdown in a particular market could have a negative effect on our self storage revenues.
If competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below the rental rates we charge our customers, we may lose potential or existing customers and we may be pressured to discount our rental rates to retain customers. As a result, our rental revenues may become insufficient to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to facilities that we would not otherwise make, which could reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be unable to promptly re-let units within our facilities at satisfactory rental rates.
Generally our leases will be on a month-to-month basis. Delays in re-letting units as vacancies arise would reduce our revenues and could adversely affect our operating performance. In addition, lower than expected rental rates upon re-letting could adversely affect our rental revenues and impede our growth.
We will depend on our on-site personnel to maximize customer satisfaction at each of our facilities, and any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training and retaining skilled field personnel may adversely affect our rental revenues.
The customer service, marketing skills, knowledge of local market demand and competitive dynamics of our facility managers will be contributing factors to our ability to maximize our rental income and to achieve the highest sustainable rent levels at each of our facilities. If we are unable to successfully recruit, train and retain qualified field personnel, our rental revenues may be adversely affected, which could impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Legal claims related to moisture infiltration and mold could arise in one or more of our properties, which could adversely affect our revenues.
There has been an increasing number of claims and litigation against owners and managers of rental and self storage properties relating to moisture infiltration, which can result in mold or other property damage. We cannot guarantee that moisture infiltration will not occur at one or more of our properties. When we receive a complaint concerning moisture infiltration, condensation or mold problems and/or become aware that an air quality concern exists, we will implement corrective measures in accordance with guidelines and protocols we have developed with the assistance of outside experts. We cannot assure our stockholders that material legal claims relating to moisture infiltration and the presence of, or exposure to, mold will not arise in the future. These legal claims could require significant expenditures for legal defense representation which could adversely affect our revenues.
Delays in development and lease-up of our properties would reduce our profitability.
With certain properties we plan to acquire, our business plan contemplates repositioning or redeveloping that property with the goal of increasing its cash flow, value or both. Construction delays to new or existing self storage properties due to weather, unforeseen site conditions, personnel problems, and other factors could delay our anticipated tenant occupancy plan which could adversely affect our profitability. Furthermore, our estimate of the costs of repositioning or redeveloping an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate, which may result in our failure to meet our profitability goals. Additionally, we may acquire new properties not fully leased, and the cash flow from existing operations may be
25
Table of Contents
insufficient to pay the operating expenses associated with that property until the property is fully leased. If one or more of these properties do not perform as expected or we are unable to successfully integrate new properties into our existing operations, our financial performance and our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected.
The risks associated with storage contents may increase our operating costs or expose us to potential liability that may not be covered by insurance, which may have adverse effects on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
The self storage facilities we own and operate are leased directly to tenants who store their belongings without any immediate inspections or oversight from us. We may unintentionally lease space to groups engaged in illegal and dangerous activities. Damage to storage contents may occur due to, among other occurrences, the following: war, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, environmental matters or events caused by fault of a tenant, fault of a third party or fault of our own. Such damage may or may not be covered by insurance maintained by us, if any. Our customers are required to acquire their own insurance coverage on storage contents or assume all of the risk. Our Advisor will determine the amounts and types of insurance coverage that we will maintain, including any coverage over the contents of any properties in which we may invest. Such determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis by our Advisor based on the type, value, location and risks associated with each investment, as well as any lender requirements, and any other factors our Advisor may consider relevant. Historically, our Sponsor has maintained coverage that includes comprehensive property and general liability coverage, including customer goods legal liability coverage, which covers damage to customer goods due to liability on our part. However, there is no guarantee that such insurance will be obtained for any investments that we may make and there is no guarantee that any particular damage to storage contents would be covered by such insurance, even if obtained. The costs associated with maintaining such insurance, as well as any liability imposed upon us due to damage to storage contents, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Additionally, although we will require our tenants to sign an agreement stating that they will not store flammable, hazardous, illegal or dangerous contents in the self storage units, we cannot ensure that our tenants will abide by such agreement. The storage of such materials might cause destruction to a facility or impose liability on us for the costs of removal or remediation if these various contents or substances are released on, from or in a facility, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Our operating results may be affected by regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on our specific facilities, which may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Certain regulatory changes may have a direct impact on our self storage facilities, including but not limited to, land use, zoning and permitting requirements by governmental authorities at the local level, which can restrict the availability of land for development, and special zoning codes which omit certain uses of property from a zoning category. These special uses (i.e., hospitals, schools, and self storage facilities) are allowed in that particular zoning classification only by obtaining a special use permit and the permission of local zoning authority. If we are delayed in obtaining or unable to obtain a special use permit where one is required, new developments or expansion of existing developments could be delayed or reduced. Additionally, certain municipalities require holders of a special use permit to have higher levels of liability coverage than is normally required. The acquisition of, or the inability to obtain, a special use permit and the possibility of higher levels of insurance coverage associated therewith may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
26
Table of Contents
If we enter into non-compete agreements with the sellers of the self storage properties that we acquire, and the terms of those agreements expire, the sellers may compete with us within the general location of one of our self storage facilities, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and returns to our stockholders.
We may enter into non-compete agreements with the sellers of the self storage properties that we acquire in order to prohibit the seller from owning, operating, or being employed by a competing self storage property for a predetermined time frame and within a geographic radius of a self storage facility we acquire. When these non-compete agreements expire, we may face the risk that the seller will develop, own, operate or become employed by a competing self storage facility within the general location of one of our properties, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and returns to our stockholders.
General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Our operating results will be affected by economic and regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general, and we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties.
Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
| • | changes in general economic or local conditions; |
| • | changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area; |
| • | changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive; |
| • | changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; |
| • | changes in property tax assessments and insurance costs; and |
| • | increases in interest rates and tight money supply. |
These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our real estate properties.
We may suffer reduced or delayed revenues for, or have difficulty selling, properties with vacancies.
We anticipate that many of the properties we acquire will have stabilized occupancy levels (generally at or above 80%). However, certain of the real properties we acquire may have a higher level of vacancy at the time of closing either because the property is in the process of being developed and constructed, it is newly constructed and in the process of obtaining tenants, or because of economic or competitive or other factors. Shortly after a new property is opened, during a time of development and construction, or because of economic or competitive or other factors, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in lower cash distributions to our stockholders due to a lack of an optimum level of tenants. In addition, the resale value of the real property could be diminished because the market value may depend principally upon the value of the leases of such real property. In addition, because a property’s market value depends principally upon its occupancy rate, the resale value of properties with prolonged low occupancy rates could suffer, which could further reduce stockholders’ return.
27
Table of Contents
We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property.
The seller of a property will often sell such property in its “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. Also, many sellers of real estate are single purpose entities without significant other assets. The purchase of properties with limited warranties or from undercapitalized sellers increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property as well as rental income from that property.
Our inability to sell a property when we desire to do so could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. Real estate generally cannot be sold quickly. Also, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our facilities for investment, rather than for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of facilities that otherwise would be in our best interest. Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or on favorable terms, in response to economic or other market conditions, and this may adversely impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
In addition, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
In acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These provisions would also restrict our ability to sell a property.
We may not be able to sell our properties at a price equal to, or greater than, the price for which we purchased such properties, which may lead to a decrease in the value of our assets.
We may be purchasing our properties at a time when capitalization rates are at historically low levels and purchase prices are high. Therefore, the value of our properties may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell our properties, or in the event we are able to sell such property, may lead to a sale price less than the price that we paid to purchase the properties.
We may acquire or finance properties with lock-out provisions, which may prohibit us from selling a property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.
Lock-out provisions are provisions that generally prohibit repayment of a loan balance for a certain number of years following the origination date of a loan. Such provisions are typically provided for by the Code or the terms of the agreement underlying a loan. Lock-out provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing properties. These provisions would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Lock-out provisions may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with
28
Table of Contents
respect to any properties, refinancing such indebtedness on a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness with respect to such properties.
Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take actions during the lock-out period that would otherwise be in stockholders best interests and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of the shares, relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control, even though that disposition or change in control might be in stockholders best interests.
Rising expenses could reduce cash available for distribution.
Any properties that we buy in the future will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating expenses, we could be required to expend funds for that property’s operating expenses. Our properties will be subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance and administrative expenses.
If we are unable to offset such cost increases through rent increases, we could be required to fund those increases in operating costs which could adversely affect cash available for distribution.
Adverse economic conditions will negatively affect our returns and profitability.
Recent geopolitical events have exacerbated the general economic slowdown that has affected the nation as a whole and the local economies where our properties may be located. Economic weakness and higher unemployment, combined with higher costs, especially for energy, food and commodities, has put considerable pressure on consumer spending, which, along with reduced availability of debt financing, has resulted in many U.S. companies experiencing poorer financial and operating performance over the past few years than in prior periods. The following market and economic challenges may adversely affect our operating results:
| • | poor economic times may result in tenant defaults under leases or bankruptcy; |
| • | re-leasing may require reduced rental rates under the new leases; and |
| • | increased insurance premiums, resulting in part from the increased risk of terrorism and natural disasters, may reduce funds available for distribution. |
A continuing environment of declining prices could further weaken real estate markets. We do not know how long the slowdown will last, or when, or even if, real estate markets will return to more normal conditions. Since we cannot predict when real estate markets may recover, the value of our properties may decline if market conditions persist or worsen. Further, the results of operations for a property in any one period may not be indicative of results in future periods, and the long-term performance of such property generally may not be comparable to, and cash flows may not be as predictable as, other properties owned by third parties in the same or similar industry. The already weak conditions in the real estate markets could be further exacerbated by a deterioration of national or regional economic conditions. Our property values and operations could be negatively affected to the extent that the current economic downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
29
Table of Contents
If we suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of insurance coverage, we could lose invested capital and anticipated profits.
Material losses may occur in excess of insurance proceeds with respect to any property, as insurance may not be sufficient to fund the losses. However, there are types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, which are either uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that commercial property owners purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our potential properties. In these instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure our stockholders that will have adequate coverage for such losses. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 is designed for a sharing of terrorism losses between insurance companies and the federal government. We cannot be certain how this act will impact us or what additional cost to us, if any, could result. If such an event damaged or destroyed one or more of our properties, we could lose both our invested capital and anticipated profits from such property.
Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of real properties could adversely affect stockholders returns. Although we expect that we will invest primarily in properties that have operating histories or in which construction is complete, from time to time we may acquire unimproved real property, properties that are in need of redevelopment, or properties that are under development or construction. Investments in such properties will be subject to the uncertainties associated with the development and construction of real property, including those related to re-zoning land for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builders’ ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgets and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control.
Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and lease available space. Therefore, our stockholders could suffer delays in the receipt of cash distributions attributable to those particular real properties. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of a property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a purchase price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and the return on our investment could suffer.
Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental matters, may adversely affect our income and the cash available for distribution.
All real property, including any self storage properties we acquire, and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater
30
Table of Contents
discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. This liability could be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent a property, or to pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings.
Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and that may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. Any material expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and may reduce the value of stockholders investment.
We cannot assure our stockholders that any environmental assessment that we obtain will reveal all environmental liabilities or that a prior owner of a property did not create a material environmental condition not known to us. We cannot predict what other environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or what environmental conditions may be found to exist in the future. We cannot assure our stockholders that our business, assets, results of operations, liquidity or financial condition will not be adversely affected by these laws, which may adversely affect cash available for distribution, and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for distribution.
Our properties will be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services, including restaurants and retail stores, be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties, or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third party to ensure compliance with the ADA. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for ADA compliance may affect cash available for distribution and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows.
In some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to stockholders. Additionally, the distribution of the proceeds of
31
Table of Contents
sales to our stockholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Increases in interest rates may adversely affect the demand for our shares.
One of the factors that influences the demand for purchase of our shares is the annual rate of distributions that we pay on our shares, as compared with interest rates. An increase in interest rates may lead potential purchasers of our shares to demand higher annual distribution rates, which could adversely affect our ability to sell our shares and raise proceeds in the Offering. This could also result in us owning a less diversified portfolio of real estate.
Property taxes may increase, which will adversely affect our net operating income and cash available for distributions.
Each of our properties is subject to real property taxes. Some local real property tax assessors may seek to reassess some of our properties as a result of our acquisition of the property. From time to time, our property taxes may increase as property values or assessment rates change or for other reasons deemed relevant by the assessors. Recent local government shortfalls in tax revenue may cause pressure to increase tax rates or assessment levels. Increases in real property taxes will adversely affect our net operating income and cash available for distributions.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of stockholders investment.
Although, technically, our board may approve unlimited levels of debt, our charter generally limits us to incurring debt no greater than 300% of our net assets before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves (approximately 75% leverage), unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with a justification for such excess borrowing. High debt levels would cause us to incur higher interest charges, would result in higher debt service payments, and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of stockholders investment.
We have incurred, and intend to continue to incur, mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks.
We have placed, and intend to continue to place, permanent financing on our properties or obtain a credit facility or other similar financing arrangement in order to acquire properties as funds are being raised in the Offering. We may also decide to later further leverage our properties. We may incur mortgage debt and pledge all or some of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire real properties. We may borrow if we need funds to pay a desired distribution rate to our stockholders. We may also borrow if we deem it necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from our properties and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt, then the amount available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced.
32
Table of Contents
We have incurred, and intend to continue to incur indebtedness secured by our properties, which may result in foreclosure.
Most of our borrowings to acquire properties have been and will be secured by mortgages on our properties. If we default on our secured indebtedness, the lender may foreclose and we could lose our entire investment in the properties securing such loan, which could adversely affect distributions to our stockholders. To the extent lenders require us to cross-collateralize our properties, or our loan agreements contain cross-default provisions, a default under a single loan agreement could subject multiple properties to foreclosure.
High interest rates may make it difficult for us to refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make.
For mortgage debt we have placed on our properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties and our income could be reduced. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.
Lenders have required and will likely continue to require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, lenders often impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into typically contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage or replace our Advisor or our Property Manager. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We have incurred indebtedness and expect that we will incur further indebtedness in the future. Interest we pay will reduce cash available for distribution. Additionally, if we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which could reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
Continued disruptions in the credit markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Domestic and international financial markets are currently experiencing significant disruptions which have been brought about in large part by failures in the U.S. banking system. These disruptions have severely impacted the availability of credit and have contributed to rising costs associated with obtaining credit. If debt financing is not available on terms and conditions we find acceptable, we may not be able to obtain financing for investments. If these disruptions in the credit markets persist, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be negatively impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase may be lower. In addition, if we pay fees to lock in a favorable interest rate, falling
33
Table of Contents
interest rates or other factors could require us to forfeit these fees. All of these events would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions.
Risks Associated with Co-Ownership of Real Estate
We may have increased exposure to liabilities from litigation as a result of our participation in a tenant-in-common program.
Strategic Capital Holdings, LLC, our sponsor and an affiliate of our Advisor, has developed tenant-in-common programs to facilitate the acquisition of real estate properties to be owned in co-tenancy arrangements with persons who are looking to invest proceeds from a sale of real estate to qualify for like-kind exchange treatment under Section 1031 of the Code. We may participate in the tenant-in-common program by either co-investing in the property with the exchange investors or purchasing a tenant-in common interest from an affiliate of our Advisor, generally at the cost of the property paid by such affiliate. Changes in tax laws may result in tenant-in-common programs no longer being available, which may adversely affect such programs or cause them not to achieve their intended value. Even though we will not sponsor these tenant-in-common programs, we may be named in or otherwise required to defend against any lawsuits brought by tenant-in-common participants because of our affiliation with sponsors of such transactions. Furthermore, in the event that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) conducts an audit of the purchasers of co-tenancy interests and successfully challenges the qualification of the transaction as a like-kind exchange, purchasers of co-tenancy interests may file a lawsuit against the entity offering the co-tenancy interests, its sponsors, and/or us. In such event, we may be involved in one or more such offerings and could therefore be named in or otherwise required to defend against lawsuits brought by other tenant-in-common participants. Any amounts we are required to expend defending any such claims will reduce the amount of funds available for investment by us in properties or other investments and may reduce the amount of funds available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, disclosure of any such litigation may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the future through the sale of stock.
We may be subject to risks associated with tenant-in-common programs inherent in ownership of co-tenancy interests with non-affiliated third parties.
In connection with some of our property acquisitions, we currently or subsequently may become tenant-in-common owners of properties in which an affiliate of our Advisor sells tenant-in-common interests to tenant-in-common participants. As an owner of tenant-in-common interests in properties, we will be subject to the risks inherent to the ownership of co-tenancy interests with unrelated third parties. In a substantial majority of these transactions, the underlying property serves as collateral for the mortgage loan to finance the purchase of the property. To the extent the loan is not repaid in full as part of the tenant-in-common program, the loan remains outstanding after the sale of the co-tenancy interests to the tenant-in-common participants. Each co-tenant is a borrower under the loan agreements. These loans generally are non-recourse against the tenant-in-common participants’ interests and are secured by the real property. However, the tenant-in-common participants are required to indemnify, and become liable to, the lender for customary carve-outs under the applicable financing documents, including but not limited to fraud or intentional misrepresentation by a co-tenant or a guarantor of the loan, physical waste of the property, misapplication or misappropriation of insurance proceeds, and failure to pay taxes.
We will be subject to risks associated with the co-tenants in our co-ownership arrangements that otherwise may not be present in other real estate investments.
We may enter into tenant-in-common, Delaware Statutory Trust (“DST”), or other co-ownership arrangements with respect to a portion of the properties we acquire. In connection with the Merger Transactions, we acquired minority interests in several DSTs affiliated with our Sponsor. In May and
34
Table of Contents
November of 2010 we increased our ownership from 3.05% to 19.75% in Self Storage I DST, a DST sponsored by our Sponsor. Subsequent to December 31, 2010 we acquired the remaining interests in Self Storage I DST, such that we owned 100% of the interests as of February 2011. Ownership of co-ownership interests involves risks generally not otherwise present with an investment in real estate, such as the following:
| • | the risk that a co-owner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our business interests or goals; |
| • | the risk that a co-owner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives; |
| • | the possibility that an individual co-owner might become insolvent or bankrupt, or otherwise default under the applicable mortgage loan financing documents, which may constitute an event of default under all of the applicable mortgage loan financing documents or allow the bankruptcy court to reject the tenants-in-common agreement or management agreement entered into by the co-owner owning interests in the property; |
| • | the possibility that a co-owner might not have adequate liquid assets to make cash advances that may be required in order to fund operations, maintenance and other expenses related to the property, which could result in the loss of current or prospective tenants and may otherwise adversely affect the operation and maintenance of the property, and could cause a default under the mortgage loan financing documents applicable to the property and may result in late charges, penalties and interest, and may lead to the exercise of foreclosure and other remedies by the lender; |
| • | the risk that a co-owner could breach agreements related to the property, which may cause a default under, or result in personal liability for, the applicable mortgage loan financing documents, violate applicable securities law and otherwise adversely affect the property and the co-ownership arrangement; or |
| • | the risk that a default by any co-owner would constitute a default under the applicable mortgage loan financing documents that could result in a foreclosure and the loss of all or a substantial portion of the investment made by the co-owner. |
Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce the amount available for distribution to our stockholders.
In the event that our interests become adverse to those of the other co-owners, we will not have the contractual right to purchase the co-ownership interests from the other co-owners. Even if we are given the opportunity to purchase such co-ownership interests in the future, we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available at the time to purchase co-ownership interests from the co-owners.
We might want to sell our co-ownership interests in a given property at a time when the other co-owners in such property do not desire to sell their interests. Therefore, we may not be able to sell our interest in a property at the time we would like to sell. In addition, we anticipate that it will be much more difficult to find a willing buyer for our co-ownership interests in a property than it would be to find a buyer for a property we owned outright.
35
Table of Contents
Federal Income Tax Risks
Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions, as we would incur additional tax liabilities.
Baker Donelson, our legal counsel, has rendered its opinion that we have been organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT pursuant to Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008, and that our organization and method of operation will enable us to meet the qualifications and requirements for taxation as a REIT under the Code, based upon our representations as to the manner in which we are and will be owned and our investment in assets and manner of operation, among other things. However, our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, through investments, actual operating results, distributions and satisfaction of specific stockholder rules, the various tests imposed by the Code. Baker Donelson will not review these operating results or compliance with the qualification standards on an ongoing basis. This means that we may fail to satisfy the REIT requirements in the future. Also, this opinion represents Baker Donelson’s legal judgment based on the law in effect as of the date of the opinion. Baker Donelson’s opinion is not binding on the IRS or the courts and we will not apply for a ruling from the IRS regarding our status as a REIT. Future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the federal income tax laws could be applied retroactively, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax and any applicable alternative minimum tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the distributions paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.
To qualify as a REIT, and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes and maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (including the Offering), or sell assets to pay distributions, which may result in our distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.
To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income, and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on acquisitions of properties, and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (including the Offering) or sell assets in order to distribute enough of our taxable income to maintain our REIT status and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes. These methods of obtaining funding could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs and decreasing available cash. In addition, such distributions may constitute a return of investors’ capital.
36
Table of Contents
If any of our partnerships fails to maintain its status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, its income would be subject to taxation and our REIT status would be terminated.
We intend to maintain the status of our partnerships, including our operating partnership, as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of any of our partnerships as a partnership, it would be taxable as a corporation. Such an event would reduce the amount of distributions that such partnership could make to us. This would also result in our losing REIT status and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the return on stockholders investment. In addition, if any of the entities through which any of our partnerships owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to such partnership. Such a recharacterization of any of our partnerships or an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.
Our stockholders may have tax liability on distributions our stockholders elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If our stockholders participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, our stockholders will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of investors’ capital. As a result, unless our stockholders are a tax-exempt entity, our stockholders may have to use funds from other sources to pay our stockholders’ tax liability on the value of the common stock received.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly, at the level of the operating partnership, or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be required to pay some taxes due to actions of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax. We have elected to treat Strategic Storage TRS, Inc. as a taxable REIT subsidiary, along with a Canadian taxable REIT subsidiary and two taxable REIT subsidiaries acquired in the Merger Transactions, and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future. In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation. For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. Finally, some state and
37
Table of Contents
local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income, because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs. To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.
Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock nor gain from the sale of common stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:
| • | part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common stock may be treated as unrelated business taxable income if shares of our common stock are predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, we are required to rely on a special look-through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT share ownership tests, and we are not operated in a manner to avoid treatment of such income or gain as unrelated business taxable income; |
| • | part of the income and gain recognized by a tax exempt investor with respect to our common stock would constitute unrelated business taxable income if the investor incurs debt in order to acquire the common stock; and |
| • | part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to our common stock by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17) or (20) of the Code may be treated as unrelated business taxable income. |
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, or we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments in order to comply with the REIT tests. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.
The tax rate applicable to qualifying corporate distributions received by individuals prior to 2013 has been reduced to a maximum rate of 15%. This special tax rate is generally not applicable to distributions paid by a REIT, unless such distributions represent earnings on which the REIT itself has been taxed. As a result, distributions (other than capital gain distributions) we pay to individual investors generally will be subject to the tax rates that are otherwise applicable to ordinary income, which currently are as high as 35%. This change in law may make an investment in our shares comparatively less attractive to individual investors than an investment in the shares of non-REIT corporations, and could have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock. Stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on our stockholders’ investment in our common stock and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common stock.
38
Table of Contents
Foreign purchasers of our common stock may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the sale of their shares.
A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50% of the REIT’s stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence.
We cannot assure our stockholders that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by foreign investors on a sale of our shares would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless our shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5% of the value of our outstanding common stock.
ERISA Risks
There are special considerations that apply to pension or profit-sharing trusts or IRAs investing in our shares which could cause an investment in our company to be a prohibited transaction and could result in additional tax consequences.
If our stockholders are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), Keogh or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in our common stock, stockholders should satisfy themselves that, among other things:
| • | their investment is consistent with their fiduciary obligations under ERISA and the Code; |
| • | their investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing their plan or IRA, including their plan’s investment policy; |
| • | their investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of ERISA; |
| • | their investment will not impair the liquidity of the plan or IRA; |
| • | their investment will not produce UBTI for the plan or IRA; |
| • | they will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements; and |
| • | their investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. |
Persons investing the assets of employee benefit plans should consider ERISA risks of investing in our shares.
ERISA and Code Section 4975 prohibit certain transactions that involve (1) certain pension, profit-sharing, employee benefit, or retirement plans or individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans, and (2) any person who is a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to such a plan. Consequently, the fiduciary of a plan contemplating an investment in the shares should consider whether we, any other person associated with the issuance of the shares, or any of their affiliates is or might become a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to the plan and, if so, whether an exception from such prohibited transaction rules is applicable. In addition, the Department of Labor plan asset regulations provide that, subject to certain exceptions, the assets of an entity in which a plan holds
39
Table of Contents
an equity interest may be treated as assets of an investing plan, in which event the underlying assets of such entity (and transactions involving such assets) would be subject to the prohibited transaction provisions. We intend to take such steps as may be necessary to qualify us for one or more of the exceptions available, and thereby prevent our assets as being treated as assets of any investing plan.
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Not Applicable.
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned 45 self storage facilities located in 15 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia) and Canada comprising approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million rentable square feet. Of the 45 properties we wholly-owned as of December 31, 2010, 19 were acquired during 2010. We also had interests in 19 additional self storage facilities through preferred equity and/or minority interests. Additionally, we have an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
As of December 31, 2010, our self storage portfolio was comprised as follows:
| State/Province |
No. of Properties |
Units | Sq. Ft. (net) |
|||||||||
| Alabama(1) |
2 | 1,075 | 144,500 | |||||||||
| Arizona |
4 | 1,970 | 242,850 | |||||||||
| California(1) |
3 | 2,900 | 425,700 | |||||||||
| Florida |
6 | 5,850 | 602,150 | |||||||||
| Georgia(1) |
2 | 1,170 | 128,500 | |||||||||
| Illinois |
4 | 2,475 | 370,400 | (2) | ||||||||
| Kentucky |
5 | 2,800 | 401,000 | |||||||||
| Mississippi |
1 | 600 | 66,600 | |||||||||
| Nevada |
5 | 2,690 | 356,700 | |||||||||
| New Jersey |
3 | 2,900 | 250,900 | |||||||||
| Ontario, Canada |
1 | 1,060 | 110,000 | |||||||||
| Pennsylvania |
2 | 1,290 | 155,200 | |||||||||
| South Carolina |
1 | 460 | 65,200 | |||||||||
| Tennessee |
1 | 800 | 100,400 | |||||||||
|
Texas(1) |
4 | 3,100 | 479,500 | |||||||||
| Virginia |
1 | 500 | 49,900 | |||||||||
| Total |
45 | 31,640 | 3,949,500 | |||||||||
| (1) | Does not include any property where we owned a minority interest, including the interests owned in the Montgomery County Self Storage, DST properties, the San Francisco Self Storage DST property, the Hawthorne property, the Self Storage I DST properties, the WP Baltimore Self Storage property and the Southwest Colonial, DST properties. |
| (2) | Includes approximately 85,000 rentable square feet of industrial warehouse/office space at the Chicago – Ogden Ave. property. |
40
Table of Contents
The map below shows the geographic location of our self storage portfolio as of December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned the following 45 self storage facilities:
| Property |
Acquisition Date |
Year Built | Approx. Units |
Approx. Sq. Ft. (net) |
%
Physical Occupancy(1) |
%
Climate Controlled(2) |
||||||||||||||
| Biloxi - MS |
9/25/2008 | 1980/1984/1992 | 600 | 66,600 | 64.4 | % | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Gulf Breeze I - FL |
9/25/2008 | 1978/1982/2004 | 700 | 80,000 | 85.6 | % | 61.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Manassas - VA |
12/19/2008 | 1996/2000 | 500 | 49,900 | 78.2 | % | 51.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Walton - KY |
2/12/2009 | 1991 | 430 | 72,000 | 87.8 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Crescent Springs - KY |
2/12/2009 | 1999/2003 | 350 | 57,200 | 87.1 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Florence I - KY |
2/12/2009 | 1996 | 520 | 81,800 | 93.9 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Alpharetta - GA |
6/1/2009 | 2003 | 670 | 76,500 | 75.5 | % | 59.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Marietta - GA |
6/1/2009 | 2006 | 500 | 52,000 | 80.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Erlanger - KY |
7/17/2009 | 1987 | 610 | 63,700 | 83.9 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Florence II - KY |
7/17/2009 | 1982/1995 | 890 | 126,300 | 77.4 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Jersey City - NJ |
8/21/2009 | 1985 | 1,090 | 91,500 | 70.5 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Montgomery - AL |
9/3/2009 | 1995/2004 | 600 | 94,600 | 73.8 | % | 22.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Phoenix I - AZ |
9/4/2009 | 1974 | 520 | 38,750 | 54.6 | % | 83.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Seabrook - TX |
9/24/2009 | 2001-2003 | 680 | 78,000 | 87.4 | % | 51.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Greenville - SC |
9/24/2009 | 1948/1995 | 460 | 65,200 | 89.7 | % | 66.0 | % | ||||||||||||
41
Table of Contents
| Property |
Acquisition Date |
Year Built | Approx. Units |
Approx. Sq. Ft. (net) |
%
Physical Occupancy(1) |
%
Climate Controlled(2) |
||||||||||||||
| Kemah - TX |
9/24/2009 | 1985/2005/ 1999/ 2002 | 1,300 | 239,000 | 85.4 | % | 19.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tallahassee - FL |
9/24/2009 | 1979-1987 | 1,550 | 203,700 | 69.0 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Memphis - TN |
9/24/2009 | 1987/1994 | 800 | 100,400 | 80.8 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Houston - TX |
9/24/2009 | 1984/2005 | 480 | 73,300 | 78.3 | % | 38.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas I - NV |
9/24/2009 | 2006 | 520 | 66,000 | 70.0 | % | 78.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas II - NV |
9/24/2009 | 1998 | 190 | 21,100 | 74.4 | % | 33.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Pearland - TX |
9/24/2009 | 2004/2005 | 640 | 89,200 | 87.0 | % | 60.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Daphne - AL |
9/24/2009 | 2000 | 475 | 49,900 | 56.7 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Lake Forest - CA |
9/24/2009 | 2003 | 1,300 | 251,700 | 85.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Pittsburgh - PA |
12/11/2009 | 1990 | 470 | 55,200 | 73.5 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| West Mifflin - PA |
12/11/2009 | 1983 | 820 | 100,000 | 66.2 | % | 20.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Fort Lee - NJ |
2/24/2010 | 2000 | 990 | 98,000 | 86.2 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Weston - FL |
2/24/2010 | 2005 | 650 | 52,000 | 94.4 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Gulf Breeze II - FL |
3/10/2010 | 2004/2005 | 290 | 39,750 | 45.5 | % | 72.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Mesa - AZ |
4/9/2010 | 2002 | 570 | 75,600 | 75.2 | % | 27.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Oakland Park - FL |
4/16/2010 | 1987 | 1,620 | 104,000 | 86.0 | % | 95.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Phoenix II - AZ |
5/6/2010 | 1974 | 440 | 73,000 | 67.9 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tempe - AZ |
5/6/2010 | 1973 | 440 | 55,500 | 73.6 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Riverdale - NJ |
5/14/2010 | 2007 | 820 | 61,400 | 49.9 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Davie - FL |
7/14/2010 | 1988 | 1,040 | 122,700 | 68.7 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Chicago - 95th St. - IL |
10/22/2010 | 2002 | 690 | 72,000 | 80.3 | % | 20.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Chicago - Western Ave. - IL |
10/22/2010 | 2004 | 590 | 59,000 | 64.7 | % | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Chicago - Ogden Ave. - IL |
10/26/2010 | 2002 | 750 | 194,400 | (3) | 62.8 | % | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
| Las Vegas III - NV |
10/29/2010 | 2005 | 700 | 94,000 | 65.4 | % | 69.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Chicago - Roosevelt Rd. - IL |
11/16/2010 | 2004 | 445 | 45,000 | 90.0 | % | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Dufferin - Toronto - Ontario, Canada |
11/23/2010 | 1965/2008 | 1,060 | 110,000 | 57.8 | % | 96.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| La Cienega - LA - CA |
12/16/2010 | 2004 | 770 | 87,000 | 82.2 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Long Beach - CA |
12/16/2010 | 1999 | 830 | 87,000 | 88.7 | % | 80.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas IV - NV |
12/21/2010 | 1996 | 540 | 81,600 | 83.7 | % | 95.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas VI - NV |
12/29/2010 | 2006 | 740 | 94,000 | 68.2 | % | 65.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total |
31,640 | 3,949,500 | 76.3 | % | 38.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2010. |
| (2) | Represents the percentage of rentable square feet in climate-controlled units as of December 31, 2010. |
| (3) | Includes approximately 85,000 rentable square feet of industrial warehouse/office space. |
The above physical occupancy includes acquisitions of lease-up properties, defined as properties that as of the acquisition date had physical occupancy of less than 60%; excluding those properties, the physical occupancy for the portfolio was 78.1% as of December 31, 2010.
42
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2010, we owned a minority interest in the following investments:
| Property |
% Owned |
Acquisition Date(1) |
Year Built | Approx. Units |
Approx. Sq. Ft. (net) |
Physical Occupancy (%)(2) |
%
Climate- Controlled(3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| WP Baltimore Self Storage - MD |
11.5 | % | 9/24/2009 | 2004 | 500 | 70,900 | 84.4 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| San Francisco Self Storage DST - CA |
12.26 | % |
|
9/24/2009 and 1/07/2010 |
|
1909/ 2000 | 1,100 | 77,900 | 76.7 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Hawthorne Property (4) - CA |
12.0 | % | 9/24/2009 | 1943-1966 | n/a | 356,000 | 100.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
| Self Storage I DST (5) |
19.753 | % | |
9/24/2009 through 11/30/10 |
|
1996-2004 | 5,440 | 726,000 | 80.2 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Southwest Colonial, DST TX |
0.28 | % | 9/24/2009 | 1981-2007 | 2,850 | 369,600 | 81.0 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Montgomery County Self Storage, DST – AL |
1.49 | % | 9/24/2009 | 1997-2005 | 1,600 | 152,900 | 80.9 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total / Average |
11,490 | 1,753,300 | 83.9 | % | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the date we acquired the interest in such investment. |
| (2) | Represents occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2010. |
| (3) | Represents the percentage of rentable square feet in climate-controlled units as of December 31, 2010. |
| (4) | Not a self storage facility. We have a 12% direct investment in Westport LAX, the entity owning the property, and an indirect interest in Westport LAX through a preferred equity investment in USA Hawthorne, LLC, which has a direct investment in Westport LAX. |
| (5) | In February 2011, we acquired all of the remaining interests in Self Storage I DST. |
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the average monthly rent per occupied square foot for the 45 self storage facilities we wholly-owned was $0.83. The weighted average capitalization rate at acquisition for these 45 self storage facilities we owned as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 7.74%. The weighted average capitalization rate is calculated as the estimated first year annual net operating income at the respective property divided by the property purchase price, exclusive of offering costs, closing costs and fees paid to the Advisor. This calculation includes several properties in their lease-up period. Upon stabilization of these properties, we expect the weighted average capitalization rate to increase.
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
| (a) | From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities. |
| (b) | None. |
| ITEM 4. | RESERVED |
43
Table of Contents
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
As of March 25, 2011, we had approximately 29.1 million shares of common stock outstanding, including approximately 1.06 million shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, held by a total of approximately 8,700 stockholders of record. There is no established trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder, or at all. We are currently selling shares of our common stock to the public at a price of $10.00 per share and at a price of $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. Additionally, we provide discounts in our Offering for certain categories of purchasers, including based on volume discounts. Pursuant to the terms of our charter, certain restrictions are imposed on the ownership and transfer of shares.
Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, it is not expected that a public market for our shares will develop. To assist fiduciaries of plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA and IRA trustees or custodians to prepare reports relating to an investment in our shares, we intend to provide reports of our quarterly and annual determinations of the current value of our net assets per outstanding share to those fiduciaries (including IRA trustees and custodians) who identify themselves to us and request the reports. Until 18 months after the completion of any subsequent offerings of our shares, we intend to use the offering price of shares in our most recent offering as the per share net asset value (unless we have made a special distribution to stockholders of net sales proceeds from the sale of one or more properties prior to the date of determination of net asset value, in which case we will use the offering price less the per share amount of the special distribution). Beginning 18 months after the completion of the last offering of our shares, our board of directors will determine the value of the properties and our other assets based on such information as our board determines appropriate, which may or may not include independent valuations of our properties or of our enterprise as a whole.
We will provide annual reports of our determination of value (1) to IRA trustees and custodians not later than January 15 of each year, and (2) to other plan fiduciaries within 75 days after the end of each calendar year. Each determination may be based upon valuation information available as of October 31 of the preceding year, updated, however, for any material changes occurring between October 31 and December 31.
There can be no assurance, however, with respect to any estimate of value that we prepare, that:
| • | the estimated value per share would actually be realized by our stockholders upon liquidation, because these estimates do not necessarily indicate the price at which properties can be sold; |
| • | our stockholders would be able to realize estimated net asset values if they were to attempt to sell their shares, because no public market for our shares exists or is likely to develop; or |
| • | that the value, or method used to establish value, would comply with ERISA or Code requirements described above. |
44
Table of Contents
Distributions
We made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2008. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
For income tax purposes, distributions to common stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain dividends, or as nontaxable distributions. To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be a non-taxable return of capital, reducing the tax basis in each U.S. stockholder’s shares, and the amount of each distribution in excess of a U.S. stockholder’s tax basis in its shares will be taxable as gain realized from the sale of its shares. For 2008 and 2009 all of our distributions constituted non-taxable returns of capital, which were paid from our Offering. For 2010, we paid a total of approximately $14.6 million in distributions, of which approximately $12.7 million constituted a non-taxable return of capital. In addition, $6.2 million of distributions in 2010 were re-invested pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan.
The following table shows the distributions we have declared and paid through December 31, 2010:
| Quarter |
Total Distributions Declared and Paid (1) |
Distributions Declared per Common Share |
Annualized Percentage Return |
|||||||||
|
2nd Quarter 2008 |
$ | 2,249 | $ | .070 | (2) | 7.00 | % | |||||
|
3rd Quarter 2008 |
$ | 78,260 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
4th Quarter 2008 |
$ | 225,356 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
1st Quarter 2009 |
$ | 379,674 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
2nd Quarter 2009 |
$ | 638,944 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
3rd Quarter 2009 |
$ | 1,005,791 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
4th Quarter 2009 |
$ | 2,234,958 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
1st Quarter 2010 |
$ | 2,930,892 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
2nd Quarter 2010 |
$ | 3,466,545 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
3rd Quarter 2010 |
$ | 3,927,846 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
4th Quarter 2010 |
$ | 4,286,896 | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | ||||||
|
1st Quarter 2011 |
n/a | $ | .175 | 7.00 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Declared distributions are paid monthly in arrears. All declared amounts were paid as of December 31, 2010, except for distributions related to shares owned during December 2010, which were paid on January 18, 2011. |
| (2) | We commenced paying distributions to our stockholders on June 16, 2008 for the period from May 22, 2008 through May 31, 2008. May 22, 2008 is the date we satisfied the minimum offering requirements. |
45
Table of Contents
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides details of our Employee and Director Long-Term Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2010, under which shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance.
| Plan Category |
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Number of Securities Remaining for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans |
|||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
– | – | 2,655,806 | |||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders |
– | – | – | |||||||||
| Total |
– | – | 2,655,806 | |||||||||
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We registered 110,000,000 shares of our common stock in the Offering (SEC File No. 333-146959, effective March 17, 2008), of which we registered 100,000,000 shares at $10.00 per share to be offered to the public in the Primary Offering and 10,000,000 shares offered to our investors pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share. As of December 31, 2010, we had issued approximately 20.9 million shares of common stock in our Offering, raising gross offering proceeds of approximately $207.7 million. From this amount, we paid $4.9 million in acquisition fees to our Advisor, approximately $19.8 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees to our Dealer Manager (of which approximately $15.8 million was reallowed to third party broker dealers), and approximately $3.4 million in organization and offering costs to our Advisor. With the net offering proceeds and indebtedness, we acquired approximately $179 million in self storage facilities and made the other payments reflected under “Cash Flows from Financing Activities” in our consolidated statements of cash flows included in this report.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
As noted in Notes 2 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report, and more fully described in our prospectus dated October 28, 2009, as supplemented from time to time, our board of directors adopted a share redemption program on February 25, 2008, which enables our stockholders to have their shares redeemed by us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations described in our prospectus. Our share redemption program has no set termination date, but our ability to redeem shares under the program is limited as described in the prospectus. As of December 31, 2010, the maximum amount that may yet be redeemed under our publicly announced program is approximately $4.3 million. As of December 31, 2010, there were approximately 203,000 shares that were requested to be redeemed but could not be as we had reached our annual maximum redemption amount under our share redemption program. The aforementioned shares not redeemed, as well as any additional qualifying requests received in the first quarter of 2011, will be treated as requests for redemption in the first quarter of 2011. Our board of directors may choose to amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice at any time.
46
Table of Contents
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we redeemed shares as follows:
| For the Quarter Ended(1) |
Total Number of Shares Redeemed as Part of Publicly Announced Plans |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Cumulative Number of Shares Redeemed as Part of Publicly Announced Plans |
|||||||||
| March 31, 2010 |
18,232 | $ | 9.24 | 30,148 | ||||||||
| June 30, 2010 |
96,767 | $ | 9.63 | 126,915 | ||||||||
| September 30, 2010 |
138,713 | $ | 9.52 | 265,628 | ||||||||
| December 31, 2010 |
128,122 | $ | 9.64 | 393,750 | ||||||||
| (1) | We redeem shares on a quarterly basis, therefore, no shares were redeemed in other months not listed on this table. |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected financial and operating information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
For the Period from August 14, 2007 through December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
| Operating Data |
||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues |
$ | 26,161,182 | $ | 7,875,143 | $ | 365,651 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Loss from continuing operations |
(13,247,015 | ) | (7,404,519 | ) | (1,595,043 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Net loss attributable to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. |
(12,790,815 | ) | (7,302,896 | ) | (1,504,293 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Loss from continuing operations per common share-basic and diluted |
(0.59 | ) | (1.00 | ) | (2.50 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Dividends declared per common share (annualized) |
0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | — | ||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data |
||||||||||||||||
| Real estate facilities |
$ | 274,568,200 | $ | 155,058,360 | $ | 15,166,724 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Total assets |
307,361,213 | 203,701,303 | 19,819,983 | 201,000 | ||||||||||||
| Total debt |
119,811,948 | 78,256,583 | 4,000,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total liabilities |
126,805,993 | 82,997,383 | 5,532,519 | — | ||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
176,224,923 | 119,068,866 | 14,287,464 | 201,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other Data |
||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | 944,256 | $ | (2,595,891 | ) | $ | (1,106,248 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(124,477,551 | ) | (44,300,463 | ) | (16,311,595 | ) | — | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities |
106,192,928 | 68,060,180 | 19,831,475 | 201,000 | ||||||||||||
47
Table of Contents
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” above and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I.
Overview
The Company was formed on August 14, 2007 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments. Our year end is December 31.
On August 24, 2007, our Advisor purchased 100 shares of common stock for $1,000 and became our initial stockholder. Our charter authorizes 700,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. We are currently offering a maximum of 110,000,000 shares of common stock in the Offering, consisting of 100,000,000 shares for sale to the public in the Primary Offering and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan.
On March 17, 2008, the SEC declared our registration statement effective. On May 22, 2008, we satisfied the minimum offering requirements of the Primary Offering and commenced formal operations. As of December 31, 2010, in connection with our Offering, we had issued approximately 20.9 million shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $207.7 million. We may continue to sell shares in the Offering until the earlier of 180 days after the third anniversary of the effective date of the Offering, September 17, 2011, or the effective date of the registration statement for our follow-on offering (SEC Registration No. 333-168905), which we initially filed with the SEC on August 17, 2010. We also reserve the right to terminate the Offering at any time. In addition to the Offering, in September 2009 we also issued approximately 6.2 million shares in connection with the Merger Transactions (See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements accompanying this report).
In addition to sponsoring our Offering, our Sponsor owns a majority of Strategic Storage Holdings, LLC, which is the sole member of our Advisor and our Property Manager.
On September 25, 2008, we acquired our first two self storage facilities. On September 24, 2009, through the Merger Transactions, we acquired 11 of our wholly-owned facilities and all of the preferred equity and/or minority interests (see See Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements accompanying this report). As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned 45 self storage facilities located in 15 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia) and Canada comprising approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million rentable square feet. We also had interests in 19 additional self storage facilities through preferred equity and/or minority interests. Additionally, we have an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
We derive revenues principally from rents received from our customers who rent units at our self storage facilities under month-to-month leases. Therefore, our operating results depend significantly on our ability to retain our existing customers and lease our available self storage units to new customers, while maintaining and, where possible, increasing the prices for our self storage units. Additionally, our operating results depend on our customers making their required rental payments to us. We believe that our Property Manager’s approach to the management and operation of our facilities, which emphasizes
48
Table of Contents
local market oversight and control, results in quick and effective response to changes in local market conditions, including increasing rents and/or increasing occupancy levels where appropriate.
Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects the occupancy levels, rental rates, rental revenues and operating expenses of our facilities. Development of any new self storage facilities would intensify competition of self storage operators in markets in which we operate.
We believe that we will experience minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which we believe will be slightly higher over the summer months due to increased moving activity.
We have no employees and are externally advised and managed by our Advisor.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We have established accounting policies which conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. Following is a discussion of the estimates and assumptions used in setting accounting policies that we consider critical in the presentation of our financial statements. Many estimates and assumptions involved in the application of GAAP may have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance, or on the comparability of such information to amounts reported for other periods, because of the subjectivity and judgment required to account for highly uncertain items or the susceptibility of such items to change. These estimates and assumptions affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and our reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period covered by this report. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied or different amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses would have been recorded, thus resulting in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may use different estimates and assumptions that may impact the comparability of our financial condition and results of operations to those companies.
We believe that our critical accounting policies include the following: real estate purchase price allocations; the evaluation of whether any of our long-lived assets have been impaired; the determination of the useful lives of our long-lived assets; and the evaluation of the consolidation of our interests in joint ventures. The following discussion of these policies supplements, but does not supplant the description of our significant accounting policies, as contained in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report, and is intended to present our analysis of the uncertainties involved in arriving upon and applying each policy.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation
We allocate the purchase prices of acquired properties based on a number of estimates and assumptions. We allocate the purchase prices to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. These estimated fair values are based upon comparable market sales information for land and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment, building and site improvements. Acquisitions of portfolios of properties are allocated to the individual properties based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which we estimate based upon the relative size, age, and location of the individual property along with actual historical and estimated occupancy and rental rate levels, and other relevant factors. If available,
49
Table of Contents
and determined by management to be appropriate, appraised values are used, rather than these estimated values. Because we believe that substantially all of the leases in place at properties we will acquire will be at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts, we do not expect to allocate any portion of the purchase prices to above or below market leases. The determination of market rates is also subject to a number of estimates and assumptions. Our allocations of purchase prices could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as such allocations may vary dramatically based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The majority of our assets consist of long-lived real estate assets as well as intangible assets related to our acquisitions. We will continually evaluate such assets for impairment based on events and changes in circumstances that may arise in the future and that may impact the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets. When indicators of potential impairment are present, we will assess the recoverability of the particular asset by determining whether the carrying value of the asset will be recovered, through an evaluation of the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. This evaluation is based on a number of estimates and assumptions. Based on this evaluation, if the expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived asset and recognize an impairment loss. Our evaluation of the impairment of long-lived assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the amount of impairment loss, if any, recognized may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
Estimated Useful Lives of Long-Lived Assets
We assess the useful lives of the assets underlying our properties based upon a subjective determination of the period of future benefit for each asset. We will record depreciation expense with respect to these assets based upon the estimated useful lives we determine. Our determinations of the useful lives of the assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as such determinations, and the corresponding amount of depreciation expense, may vary dramatically based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
Consolidation of Investments in Joint Ventures
We evaluate the consolidation of our investments in joint ventures in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. This evaluation requires us to determine whether we have a controlling interest in a joint venture through a means other than voting rights, and, if so, such joint venture may be required to be consolidated in our financial statements. Our evaluation of our joint ventures under such accounting guidance could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the entities included in our financial statements may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
REIT Qualification
We made an election under Section 856(c) of the Code to be taxed as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2008. By qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal
50
Table of Contents
income tax purposes for four years following the year in which our qualification is denied. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, we believe that we are organized and will operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the year ended December 31, 2008, and we intend to continue to operate as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Results of Operations
Overview
As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned 45 self storage facilities located in 15 states and Canada comprising approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million rentable square feet. We also had interests in 19 additional self storage facilities through preferred equity and/or minority interests. Of those interests, one has been deemed to be a controlling interest and is therefore consolidated in our consolidated financial statements as discussed in Note 2 therein. As of December 31, 2009, we wholly-owned 26 self storage facilities located in 14 states comprising approximately 17,665 units and approximately 2.34 million rentable square feet. We also held interests in the aforementioned 19 additional self storage facilities. Additionally, as of both December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
As of December 31, 2010, our wholly-owned self storage portfolio was comprised as follows:
| State |
No. of Properties |
Units | Sq. Ft. (net) |
% of Total Rentable Sq. Ft. |
Physical Occupancy %(3) |
Climate Controlled %(4) |
Revenue % (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Alabama (1) |
2 | 1,075 | 144,500 | 3.7 | % | 67.9 | % | 49.1 | % | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Arizona |
4 | 1,970 | 242,850 | 6.1 | % | 69.4 | % | 21.8 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| California (1) |
3 | 2,900 | 425,700 | 10.8 | % | 85.2 | % | 21.5 | % | 15.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Florida |
6 | 5,850 | 602,150 | 15.2 | % | 74.7 | % | 59.5 | % | 17.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Georgia (1) |
2 | 1,170 | 128,500 | 3.3 | % | 77.3 | % | 75.6 | % | 3.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Illinois |
4 | 2,475 | 370,400 | (2) | 9.4 | % | 69.8 | % | 7.0 | % | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky |
5 | 2,800 | 401,000 | 10.2 | % | 85.0 | % | 2.0 | % | 8.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Mississippi |
1 | 600 | 66,600 | 1.7 | % | 64.4 | % | 12.2 | % | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Nevada |
5 | 2,690 | 356,700 | 9.0 | % | 71.7 | % | 73.6 | % | 6.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| New Jersey |
3 | 2,900 | 250,900 | 6.4 | % | 71.6 | % | 63.5 | % | 12.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Ontario, Canada |
1 | 1,060 | 110,000 | 2.8 | % | 57.8 | % | 96.7 | % | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania |
2 | 1,290 | 155,200 | 3.9 | % | 68.8 | % | 18.4 | % | 3.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| South Carolina |
1 | 460 | 65,200 | 1.7 | % | 89.7 | % | 66.0 | % | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee |
1 | 800 | 100,400 | 2.5 | % | 80.8 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Texas (1) |
4 | 3,100 | 479,500 | 12.1 | % | 84.9 | % | 35.2 | % | 10.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Virginia |
1 | 500 | 49,900 | 1.2 | % | 78.2 | % | 51.0 | % | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Total |
45 | 31,640 | 3,949,500 | 100 | % | 76.3 | % | 38.2 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Does not include properties in which we own a minority interest, including the interests owned in the Montgomery County Self Storage, DST properties, the San Francisco Self Storage DST property, the Hawthorne property, the Self Storage I DST properties, the WP Baltimore Self Storage property and the Southwest Colonial, DST properties. |
51
Table of Contents
| (2) | Includes approximately 85,000 rentable square feet of industrial warehouse/office space at the Chicago – Ogden Ave. property. |
| (3) | Represents the occupied square feet of all facilities we own in a state divided by total rentable square feet of all the facilities we own in such state as of December 31, 2010. |
| (4) | Represents the percentage of rentable square feet in climate-controlled units as of December 31, 2010 for each state. |
| (5) | Represents rental income (excludes ancillary income) for the month of December 2010 for all facilities we wholly-owned in a state divided by our total rental income for the month of December 2010. |
A summary of the wholly-owned facilities that we have acquired in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 is as follows:
Our Facilities by Year Acquired-Average Physical Occupancy
| Year Acquired |
Number of Facilities |
Current Rentable Square Feet |
Average Physical Occupancy % (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 |
3 | 196,500 | 81 | % | 84 | % | 85 | % | ||||||||||||
| 2009 |
23 | 2,147,050 | N/A | 81 | % | 79 | % | |||||||||||||
| 2010 |
19 | 1,605,950 | N/A | N/A | 75 | % | ||||||||||||||
| All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010 |
45 | 3,949,500 | 81 | % | 82 | % | 79 | % | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Determined by dividing the sum of the month-end occupied square feet for the applicable group of facilities for each applicable period by the sum of their month-end rentable square feet for the period. |
Our Facilities by Year Acquired – Annual Rent Per Occupied Square Foot
| Year Acquired |
Number of Facilities |
Current Rentable Square Feet |
Annual Rent Per Occupied Square Foot (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 |
3 | 196,500 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 |
23 | 2,147,050 | N/A | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.74 | |||||||||||||
| 2010 |
19 | 1,605,950 | N/A | N/A | $ | 1.22 | ||||||||||||||
| All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010 |
45 | 3,949,500 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Determined by dividing the aggregate rental revenue for each applicable period by the aggregate of the month-end occupied square feet for the period. Properties are included in the calculation in their first full month of operations. Rental revenue includes rental income, but excludes ancillary income. |
Our Facilities by Year Acquired – Rental Income
| Year Acquired |
Number of Facilities |
Current Rentable Square Feet |
Rental Income by Year of Acquisition (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 |
3 | 196,500 | $ | 363,006 | $ | 1,694,939 | $ | 1,702,807 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 |
23 | 2,147,050 | N/A | $ | 5,563,439 | $ | 15,811,047 | |||||||||||||
| 2010 |
19 | 1,605,950 | N/A | N/A | $ | 6,468,368 | ||||||||||||||
| All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010 |
45 | 3,949,500 | $ | 363,006 | $ | 7,258,378 | $ | 23,982,222 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | The rental income attributable to our consolidated joint venture is excluded from the above table. |
52
Table of Contents
A comparison of rental income, occupancy and the number of wholly-owned self storage facilities that were owned for the entire respective period in both 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| 2010 Rental Income |
2009 Rental Income |
Increase % |
2010 Physical Occupancy (1) |
2009 Physical Occupancy (1) |
No.
Of Facilities(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31 |
$ | 435,225 | $ | 427,057 | 1.9 | % | 76.5 | % | 76.9 | % | 3 | |||||||||||||
| June 30 |
777,086 | 716,015 | 8.5 | % | 85.8 | % | 82.6 | % | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| September 30 |
1,152,662 | 1,074,622 | 7.3 | % | 82.8 | % | 80.5 | % | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| December 31 |
4,254,815 | 4,235,234 | 0.5 | % | 79.4 | % | 79.3 | % | 24 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 6,619,788 | $ | 6,452,928 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet as of the end of the respective period. |
| (2) | Number of facilities is as of the end of the period shown. |
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we owned 45, 26 and 3 self storage facilities, respectively. The comparability of our results of operations is significantly affected by acquisition activity in 2010, 2009 and 2008 as listed below.
| • | In 2010, we acquired 19 self storage facilities for consideration of approximately $126 million. |
| • | In 2009, we acquired 23 self storage facilities for consideration of approximately $136 million. |
| • | In 2008, we acquired 3 self storage facilities for consideration of approximately $16 million. |
Of the 45 properties we owned as of December 31, 2010, we owned them for an average of approximately 9 months. Of the 26 properties we owned as of December 31, 2009, we owned them for an average of approximately 6 months. Given this significant growth through acquisitions in both of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we believe there is little basis for comparison between the years.
Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Self Storage Rental Income
Rental income for the year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $25.6 million , as compared to rental income for the year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately $7.7 million. The increase in rental income arises primarily from the acquisition of 19 properties during 2010 and a full year of rental income from the 23 properties acquired in 2009. We expect rental income to increase in future
53
Table of Contents
periods as we derive rental income for the entire year for properties acquired during 2010 and as we acquire additional self storage facilities.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $12.8 million as compared to property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately $4.0 million. Of these amounts, approximately $2.7 million and approximately $0.9 million, respectively, were paid to affiliates. The increase in property operating expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 19 properties during 2010 and a full year of property operating expenses from the 23 properties acquired in 2009. Property operating expenses include the costs to operate our facilities including payroll, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, marketing, property management fees and asset management fees. We expect property operating expenses to increase in future periods as such expenses are incurred for the entire year for properties acquired during 2010 and as we acquire additional self storage facilities.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $2.8 million as compared to general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately $1.9 million. Such expenses consist primarily of legal and accounting expenses, directors’ and officers’ insurance expense, marketing expenses, transfer agent costs, an allocation of a portion of our Advisor’s payroll related costs and board of directors related costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses arises primarily from increased payroll, legal, accounting, marketing, transfer agent costs and professional expenses incurred to support our additional operations. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in future periods as we acquire additional self storage facilities, but expect such expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenues.
Depreciation and Intangible Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $13.1 million, as compared to depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 of approximately $4.3 million. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 19 properties during 2010 and a full year of such expenses on the 2009 acquisitions. Depreciation expense consists primarily of deprecation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of intangible assets resulting from our acquisitions, including the Merger Transactions. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to increase in future periods as such expenses are incurred for the entire year for properties acquired during 2010 and as we acquire additional self storage facilities.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $6.0, as compared to interest expense of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in interest expense is due to a full year of interest expense on the debt assumed in the Merger Transactions, interest expense related to debt on two of the 2010 acquisitions and interest expense incurred as a result of additional debt financing provided by two financing transactions. We expect interest expense to increase in future periods as interest expense is incurred for the entire year for debt obligations entered into during 2010 and as we acquire additional self storage facilities subject to debt obligations.
54
Table of Contents
Property Acquisition Expenses
Property acquisition expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $5.2 million, as compared to approximately $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in property acquisition expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 19 properties during 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred approximately $1.2 million of non-recurring costs related to the Merger Transactions. Under GAAP, beginning January 1, 2009, such acquisition costs are required to be expensed as incurred compared to the prior practice of capitalizing such costs and amortizing them over the estimated life of the assets acquired. We expect property acquisition expenses to increase in future periods as we acquire additional self storage facilities.
Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Ventures
Equity in earnings of real estate ventures for the year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $0.9 million compared to approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase between 2010 and 2009 is primarily due to a fully year of ownership in 2010 compared to approximately one quarter in 2009.
Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2008 include results for partial year periods for three self storage facilities that we owned as of December 31, 2008, while our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include full year periods for those three self storage facilities plus partial year periods for 23 other wholly-owned self storage facilities, interests in 19 additional self storage facilities and our interest in the net leased industrial property; therefore, we believe there is little basis for comparison between the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Self Storage Rental Income
Rental income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $7.7 million, as compared to rental income for the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $0.4 million. The increase in rental income arises primarily from the acquisition of 23 properties during 2009, which we owned for an average of 4.1 months, compared to the three properties we owned during 2008 for an average of 2.3 months.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were approximately $4.0 million, as compared to property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $0.2 million. Of these amounts, approximately $0.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were paid to affiliates. The increase in property operating expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 23 properties during 2009, which we owned for an average of 4.1 months, compared to the three properties we owned during 2008 for an average of 2.3 months. Property operating expenses include the costs to operate our facilities including payroll, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, marketing, property management fees and asset management fees.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were approximately $1.9 million, as compared to general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $1.2 million. Such expenses consist primarily of legal and accounting expenses,
55
Table of Contents
directors’ and officers’ insurance expense, marketing expenses, transfer agent costs, an allocation of a portion of our Advisor’s payroll related costs and board of directors related costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses arises primarily from increased payroll, legal, accounting and professional expenses incurred to support our additional operations.
Depreciation and Intangible Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were approximately $4.3 million, as compared to depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 of approximately $0.3 million. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 23 properties during 2009. Depreciation expense consists primarily of deprecation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of intangible assets resulting from our acquisitions, including the Merger Transactions.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.9 million, as compared to interest expense of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in interest expense arises from the increase in the number of our properties subject to debt obligations, primarily as a result of debt assumed in the Merger Transactions.
Property Acquisition Expenses
Property acquisition expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were approximately $3.3 million, as compared to none for the year ended December 31, 2008. Of these expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately $2.2 million relates to acquisition related transaction costs incurred in connection with both closed and potential acquisitions. The increase in property acquisition expenses arises primarily from the acquisition of 23 properties during 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred approximately $1.2 million of non-recurring costs related to the Merger Transactions. Under GAAP, beginning January 1, 2009, such acquisition costs are required to be expensed as incurred compared to the prior practice of capitalizing such costs and amortizing them over the estimated life of the assets acquired.
Other Financing Costs
Other financing costs were none for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to approximately $0.1 for the year ended December 31, 2008, which represents costs incurred in seeking financing for the acquisition of two self storage facilities, which closed on September 25, 2008, which financing was ultimately not obtained.
Funds From Operations
We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net income and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. Because FFO calculations exclude such factors as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and gains from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), they facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs. We believe that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have
56
Table of Contents
considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities. Other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently from us.
Our calculation of FFO, and reconciliation to net loss, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is presented in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
| Year
Ended December 31, 2010 |
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 |
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 |
||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. |
$ | (12,790,815 | ) | $ | (7,302,896 | ) | $ | (1,504,293 | ) | |||
| Add: |
||||||||||||
| Depreciation |
4,943,856 | 1,643,642 | 89,516 | |||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets |
8,143,379 | 2,601,212 | 148,735 | |||||||||
| Deduct: |
||||||||||||
| Adjustment for noncontrolling interest – consolidated entity (1) |
(737,227 | ) | (195,379 | ) | — | |||||||
| FFO |
$ | (440,807 | ) | $ | (3,253,421 | ) | $ | (1,266,042 | ) | |||
| (1) | Relates to our consolidated joint venture. The noncontrolling interest holder’s share of our consolidated venture’s real estate depreciation and amortization of intangible assets was $210,648 and $526,579, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $58,027 and $137,352, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Cash Flows
A comparison of cash flows for operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
| Net cash flow provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||
| Operating activities |
$ | 944,256 | $ | (2,595,891 | ) | $ | 3,540,147 | |||||
| Investing activities |
(124,477,551 | ) | (44,300,463 | ) | (80,177,088 | ) | ||||||
| Financing activities |
106,192,928 | 68,060,180 | 38,132,748 | |||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $0.9 million and for the year ended December 31, 2009 cash used by operating activities was approximately $2.6 million, a decrease in the use of cash year to year of approximately $3.5 million. The decreased use of cash compared to the prior period primarily relates to an improvement in the net loss, adjusted for depreciation and amortization.
57
Table of Contents
Cash flows used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $124.5 million and $44.3 million, respectively, an increase in the use of cash of approximately $80.2 million. The increase compared to the prior period primarily relates to the acquisition of additional self storage facilities purchased with cash in 2010.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $106.2 million and $68.1 million, respectively, an increase in the cash provided of approximately $38.1 million. The increase in cash provided by financing activities over the prior period primarily relates to an increase in proceeds from debt financings and proceeds from our Offering, net of increase in both distributions and redemptions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Short-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
We generally expect that we will meet our short-term operating liquidity requirements from the combination of proceeds of the Offering, proceeds from secured or unsecured financing from banks or other lenders, net cash provided by property operations and advances from our Advisor which will be repaid, without interest, as funds are available after meeting our current liquidity requirements, subject to the limitations on reimbursement set forth in our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor. Per the Advisory Agreement, all advances from our Advisor shall be reimbursed no less frequently than monthly, although our Advisor has indicated that it may waive such a requirement on a month-by-month basis. The organizational and offering costs associated with the Offering will initially be paid by us or our Advisor. Our Advisor must reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which the Offering terminates to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as properties are added to our portfolio.
Distribution Policy and Distributions
Our board of directors will determine the amount and timing of distributions to our stockholders and will base such determination on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of distributions, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code. Distributions will be paid to our stockholders as of the record date selected by our board of directors. We declare and pay distributions monthly based on daily declaration and record dates so that investors may be entitled to distributions immediately upon purchasing our shares. We expect to continue to regularly pay distributions unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions, or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Distributions will be authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which will be directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. The funds we receive from operations that are available for distribution may be affected by a number of factors, including the following:
| • | the amount of time required for us to invest the funds received in the offering; |
| • | our operating and interest expenses; |
| • | the amount of distributions or dividends received by us from our indirect real estate investments; |
| • | our ability to keep our properties occupied; |
| • | our ability to maintain or increase rental rates; |
58
Table of Contents
| • | capital expenditures and reserves for such expenditures; |
| • | the issuance of additional shares; and |
| • | financings and refinancings |
Our distributions paid over the last four quarters and the sources of such distributions are detailed below.
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2010 |
September 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions paid in cash |
$ | 2,463,666 | $ | 2,266,448 | $ | 2,003,364 | $ | 1,696,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions reinvested |
1,823,230 | 1,661,398 | 1,463,181 | 1,234,525 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total distributions |
$ | 4,286,896 | $ | 3,927,846 | $ | 3,466,545 | $ | 2,930,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source of distributions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows provided by (used in) operations |
$ | (1,263,697 | ) | (29.5 | %) | $ | 1,386,895 | 35.3 | % | $ | 940,956 | 27.1 | % | ($119,898 | ) | (4.1 | %)(1) | |||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
3,727,363 | 86.9 | % | 879,553 | 22.4 | % | 1,062,408 | 30.7 | % | 1,816,265 | 62.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions reinvested |
1,823,230 | 42.5 | % | 1,661,398 | 42.3 | % | 1,463,181 | 42.2 | % | 1,234,525 | 42.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total sources |
$ | 4,286,896 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,927,846 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,466,545 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,930,892 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Percentages listed in the table above were calculated by dividing the total sources of distributions by the source indicated. Where negative percentages exist, we used, rather than generated, cash flows from operations. At these times, the percentage of cash flows provided by operations used as a source of distributions appears as a negative number. |
Cash flows provided by (used in) operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 include approximately $2.8 million, $0.5 million, $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of real estate acquisition related expenses expensed in accordance with GAAP. We consider the real estate acquisition related expenses to have been funded by proceeds from our ongoing public offering of shares of our common stock because the expenses were incurred to acquire our real estate investments.
During our Offering, when we may raise capital more quickly than we acquire income-producing assets, and for some period after our Offering, we may not be able to pay distributions from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from debt financing or from proceeds from the issuance of common stock.
Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flows from operations. However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including our ability to raise and invest capital at favorable yields, the financial performance of our investments in the current real estate and financial environment and the types and mix of investments in our portfolio. As a result, future distributions declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operations.
Indebtedness
As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $121.5 million of outstanding consolidated indebtedness (excluding net unamortized debt discounts of approximately $1.7 million). The weighted average interest rate on our consolidated fixed rate indebtedness as of December 31, 2010 was
59
Table of Contents
approximately 5.9%. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $4.9 million of our total consolidated indebtedness was variable rate debt.
Long-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for property acquisitions, either directly or through equity interests, for the payment of operating expenses and distributions, and for the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness. Generally, cash needs for items, other than property acquisitions, will be met from operations and proceeds received from the Offering. However, there may be a delay between the sale of our shares and our purchase of properties that could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our investment operations. Our Advisor will evaluate potential additional property acquisitions and engage in negotiations with sellers on our behalf. After a purchase contract is executed that contains specific terms, the property will not be purchased until the successful completion of due diligence, which includes, among other items, review of the title insurance commitment, an appraisal and an environmental analysis. In some instances, the proposed acquisition will require the negotiation of final binding agreements, which may include financing documents. During this period, we may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from the Offering in certain investments that could yield lower returns than the properties. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions.
Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from the Offering, proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from operations. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures. To the extent we are not able to secure additional financing in the form of a credit facility or other third party source of liquidity, we will be heavily dependent upon the proceeds of the Offering and income from operations in order to meet our long-term liquidity requirements and to fund our distributions.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
| Payments due by period: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years | 3- 5 Years | More than 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage interest (1) |
$ | 38,900,500 | $ | 6,766,951 | $ | 12,551,084 | $ | 11,402,095 | $ | 8,180,370 | ||||||||||
| Mortgage principal |
121,540,216 | 6,084,313 | 10,084,382 | 12,684,429 | 92,687,092 | |||||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations |
$ | 160,440,716 | $ | 12,851,264 | $ | 22,635,466 | $ | 24,086,524 | $ | 100,867,462 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Interest expense was calculated based upon the contractual rates. The interest expense on variable rate debt was calculated based on the rate currently in effect. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Except as disclosed in the Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements accompanying this report, we do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships. Such entities are often referred to as structured finance or special purposes entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, except as disclosed in the notes to our financial statements, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitments or intent to provide funding to any such entities.
60
Table of Contents
Subsequent Events
Please see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements accompanying this report.
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk.
As of December 31, 2010, our debt consisted of approximately $116.6 million in fixed rate debt and approximately $4.9 million in variable rate debt. These instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes. Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable portions of our debt portfolio. A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of our debt portfolio impacts its fair value but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in interest rates on the variable portion of our debt portfolio, which includes a note with an interest rate floor, could impact the interest incurred and cash flows and its fair value.
The following table summarizes annual debt maturities, average interest rates and estimated fair values on our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2010:
| Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate debt |
$ | 6,027,242 | $ | 3,797,487 | $ | 1,404,411 | $ | 8,287,214 | $ | 4,397,215 | $ | 92,687,092 | $ | 116,600,661 | $ | 117,993,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average interest |
5.92 | % | 5.83 | % | 5.75 | % | 5.81 | % | 6.11 | % | 6.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable rate debt |
$ | 57,071 | $ | 4,882,484 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,939,555 | $ | 4,939,555 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average interest |
6.50 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the future, we may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and fund acquisition, expansion, and financing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed rates or variable rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or foreign currency hedges to mitigate our risk to foreign currency exposure. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this annual report are set forth below beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.
61
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
There were no changes in or disagreements with our independent registered public accountant during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for us. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2010, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010. This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to a permanent exemption provided by the SEC that permits non-accelerated filers to provide only management’s report in their annual reports.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, there was no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K which was not disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.
62
Table of Contents
We expect to file a definitive Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2011 Proxy Statement”) with the SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year. Accordingly, certain information required by Part III has been omitted under General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K and is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement. Only those sections of the 2011 Proxy Statement that specifically address the items required to be set forth herein are incorporated by reference.
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) List of Documents Filed.
1. The list of the financial statements contained herein is set forth on page F-1 hereof.
2. Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is set forth beginning on page S-1 hereof. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.
3. The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index below.
(b) See (a) 3 above.
(c) See (a) 2 above.
63
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Ladera Ranch, State of California, on March 31, 2011.
| STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ H. Michael Schwartz | |
| H. Michael Schwartz | ||
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
| Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
| /s/ H. Michael Schwartz |
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | March 31, 2011 | ||
| H. Michael Schwartz | ||||
| /s/ Michael S. McClure |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
March 31, 2011 | ||
| Michael S. McClure | ||||
| /s/ Harold “Skip” Perry |
Independent Director | March 31, 2011 | ||
| Harold “Skip” Perry | ||||
| /s/ Timothy S. Morris |
Independent Director | March 31, 2011 | ||
| Timothy S. Morris | ||||
64
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
| Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
| F-2 | ||||
| F-3 | ||||
| F-4 | ||||
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss |
F-5 | |||
| F-7 | ||||
| F-8 | ||||
| Financial Statement Schedule |
||||
| S-1 | ||||
F-1
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. Strategic Storage Trust’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
| /s/ REZNICK GROUP, P.C. |
| Baltimore, Maryland |
| March 31, 2011 |
F-2
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2010 and 2009
| December 31, |
||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,438,091 | $ | 23,778,458 | ||||
| Real estate facilities: |
||||||||
| Land |
89,547,785 | 53,116,165 | ||||||
| Buildings |
166,256,905 | 89,798,903 | ||||||
| Site improvements |
18,763,510 | 12,143,292 | ||||||
| 274,568,200 | 155,058,360 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation |
(6,677,014 | ) | (1,733,158 | ) | ||||
| 267,891,186 | 153,325,202 | |||||||
| Construction in process |
540,966 | — | ||||||
| Real estate facilities, net ($17,186,388 and $17,419,600 related to VIEs) |
268,432,152 | 153,325,202 | ||||||
| Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization |
2,326,519 | 991,916 | ||||||
| Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization |
14,153,572 | 13,717,520 | ||||||
| Restricted cash |
1,921,058 | 1,847,847 | ||||||
| Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
11,528,669 | 8,896,642 | ||||||
| Other assets |
2,561,152 | 1,143,718 | ||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 307,361,213 | $ | 203,701,303 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
| Secured promissory notes ($10,161,523 and $10,115,853 related to VIEs) |
$ | 119,811,948 | $ | 78,256,583 | ||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
4,690,570 | 3,155,174 | ||||||
| Due to affiliates |
746,108 | 610,110 | ||||||
| Distributions payable |
1,557,367 | 975,516 | ||||||
| Total liabilities |
126,805,993 | 82,997,383 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
||||||||
| Redeemable common stock |
4,330,297 | 1,635,054 | ||||||
| Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
| Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
| Common stock, $0.001 par value; 700,000,000 shares authorized; 26,658,061 and 16,638,556 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
26,659 | 16,639 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
211,685,569 | 125,714,066 | ||||||
| Distributions |
(20,734,778 | ) | (5,540,748 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated deficit |
(21,598,004 | ) | (8,807,189 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income |
124,412 | — | ||||||
| Total Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. stockholders’ equity |
169,503,858 | 111,382,768 | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest in operating partnership |
39,598 | 63,533 | ||||||
| Other noncontrolling interests |
6,681,467 | 7,622,565 | ||||||
| Total noncontrolling interests |
6,721,065 | 7,686,098 | ||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity |
176,224,923 | 119,068,866 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 307,361,213 | $ | 203,701,303 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Revenues: |
||||||||||||
| Self storage rental income |
$ | 25,576,080 | $ | 7,706,662 | $ | 363,006 | ||||||
| Ancillary operating income |
585,102 | 168,481 | 2,645 | |||||||||
| Total revenues |
26,161,182 | 7,875,143 | 365,651 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
| Property operating expenses |
10,114,722 | 3,123,018 | 119,540 | |||||||||
| Property operating expenses – affiliates |
2,667,357 | 857,864 | 54,485 | |||||||||
| General and administrative |
2,837,481 | 1,882,260 | 1,247,654 | |||||||||
| Depreciation |
5,002,442 | 1,690,189 | 111,256 | |||||||||
| Intangible amortization expense |
8,143,379 | 2,601,212 | 148,735 | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses |
28,765,381 | 10,154,543 | 1,681,670 | |||||||||
| Operating loss |
(2,604,199 | ) | (2,279,400 | ) | (1,316,019 | ) | ||||||
| Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
(5,957,460 | ) | (1,877,750 | ) | (141,555 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred financing amortization expense |
(314,637 | ) | (165,121 | ) | (88,427 | ) | ||||||
| Property acquisition expenses – affiliates |
(3,206,832 | ) | (1,564,792 | ) | — | |||||||
| Other property acquisition expenses |
(2,036,772 | ) | (1,765,090 | ) | — | |||||||
| Equity in earnings of real estate ventures |
867,178 | 240,956 | — | |||||||||
| Interest income |
26,174 | 5,217 | 27,126 | |||||||||
| Other financing costs |
— | — | (48,490 | ) | ||||||||
| Other |
(20,467 | ) | 1,461 | (27,678 | ) | |||||||
| Net loss |
(13,247,015 | ) | (7,404,519 | ) | (1,595,043 | ) | ||||||
| Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest in our operating partnership |
9,935 | 23,186 | 90,750 | |||||||||
| Net loss attributable to other noncontrolling interests |
446,265 | 78,437 | — | |||||||||
| Net loss attributable to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. |
$ | (12,790,815 | ) | $ | (7,302,896 | ) | $ | (1,504,293 | ) | |||
| Net loss per share – basic |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (1.00 | ) | $ | (2.50 | ) | |||
| Net loss per share – diluted |
$ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (1.00 | ) | $ | (2.50 | ) | |||
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic |
21,706,053 | 7,272,042 | 601,403 | |||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted |
21,706,053 | 7,272,042 | 601,403 | |||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
| Number of Shares |
Common Stock Par Value |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Distributions | Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
100 | $ | 1 | $ | 999 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 200,000 | $ | 201,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
2,068,042 | 2,068 | 20,664,901 | — | — | — | — | 20,666,969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Offering costs |
— | — | (4,675,728 | ) | — | — | — | — | (4,675,728 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions ($0.70 per share annualized) |
— | — | — | (419,171 | ) | — | — | — | (419,171 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions for noncontrolling interests |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (8,530 | ) | (8,530 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
12,417 | 12 | 117,955 | — | — | — | — | 117,967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss |
— | — | — | — | (1,504,293 | ) | — | (90,750 | ) | (1,595,043 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
2,080,559 | 2,081 | 16,108,127 | (419,171 | ) | (1,504,293 | ) | — | 100,720 | 14,287,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
8,188,873 | 8,188 | 81,717,624 | — | — | — | — | 81,725,812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Offering costs |
— | — | (9,488,920 | ) | — | — | — | — | (9,488,920 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to redeemable common stock |
— | — | (1,803,450 | ) | — | — | — | — | (1,803,450 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemptions of common stock |
(11,916 | ) | (12 | ) | (114,283 | ) | — | — | — | — | (114,295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock |
1,250 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions ($0.70 per share) |
— | — | — | (5,121,577 | ) | — | — | — | (5,121,577 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions for noncontrolling interests |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (138,999 | ) | (138,999 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
189,451 | 189 | 1,799,596 | — | — | — | — | 1,799,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued in mergers with private REITs |
6,190,339 | 6,190 | 37,468,810 | — | — | — | — | 37,475,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest acquired in mergers with private REITs |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 7,826,000 | 7,826,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation expense |
— | — | 26,562 | — | — | — | — | 26,562 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss |
— | — | — | — | (7,302,896 | ) | — | (101,623 | ) | (7,404,519 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
F-5
Table of Contents
| Number of Shares |
Common Stock Par Value |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Distributions | Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
16,638,556 | 16,639 | 125,714,066 | (5,540,748 | ) | (8,807,189 | ) | — | 7,686,098 | 119,068,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
9,748,692 | 9,749 | 97,232,099 | — | — | — | — | 97,241,848 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Offering costs |
— | — | (11,282,720 | ) | — | — | — | — | (11,282,720 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additions to redeemable common stock |
— | — | (2,526,838 | ) | — | — | — | — | (2,526,838 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemptions of common stock |
(381,834 | ) | (382 | ) | (3,655,114 | ) | — | — | — | — | (3,655,496 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock |
1,875 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions ($0.70 per share) |
— | — | — | (15,194,030 | ) | — | — | — | (15,194,030 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions for noncontrolling interests |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (324,582 | ) | (324,582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
650,772 | 651 | 6,181,683 | — | — | — | — | 6,182,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reduction of noncontrolling interests through additional investment |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (184,251 | ) | (184,251 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation expense |
— | — | 22,393 | — | — | — | — | 22,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
— | — | — | — | — | — | (456,200 | ) | (456,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. |
— | — | — | — | (12,790,815 | ) | — | — | (12,790,815 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | — | 124,412 | — | 124,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive loss |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (12,666,403 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
26,658,061 | $ | 26,659 | $ | 211,685,569 | $ | (20,734,778 | ) | $ | (21,598,004 | ) | $ | 124,412 | $ | 6,721,065 | $ | 176,224,923 | |||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
| Net loss |
$ | (13,247,015 | ) | $ | (7,404,519 | ) | $ | (1,595,043 | ) | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense |
13,460,458 | 4,456,522 | 348,417 | |||||||||
| Noncash interest expense |
288,684 | 98,506 | — | |||||||||
| Expense related to issuance of restricted stock |
22,396 | 26,565 | — | |||||||||
| Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
(726,958 | ) | (208,212 | ) | — | |||||||
| Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
448,623 | 201,353 | — | |||||||||
| Foreign currency exchange gain |
(106,427 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
| Restricted cash |
(73,211 | ) | 272,886 | — | ||||||||
| Other assets |
(478,356 | ) | (104,807 | ) | (125,290 | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
1,703,801 | 158,115 | 247,199 | |||||||||
| Due to affiliates |
(347,739 | ) | (92,300 | ) | 18,469 | |||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
944,256 | (2,595,891 | ) | (1,106,248 | ) | |||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Purchase of real estate |
(118,405,477 | ) | (44,847,171 | ) | (16,043,813 | ) | ||||||
| Cash acquired in mergers with private REITs |
— | 712,692 | — | |||||||||
| Additional investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(2,353,692 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Additional investment in noncontrolling interest |
(184,251 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Additions to construction in process |
(540,966 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Additions to real estate facilities |
(1,923,964 | ) | (165,984 | ) | — | |||||||
| Deposits on acquisition of real estate facilities |
(1,069,201 | ) | — | (267,782 | ) | |||||||
| Net cash flows used in investing activities |
(124,477,551 | ) | (44,300,463 | ) | (16,311,595 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Payments on secured promissory notes |
(3,895,927 | ) | (5,184,737 | ) | — | |||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of secured promissory notes |
37,585,000 | 4,975,000 | 4,000,000 | |||||||||
| Deferred financing costs |
(1,649,241 | ) | (1,079,663 | ) | (165,800 | ) | ||||||
| Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
97,241,848 | 81,725,812 | 20,666,969 | |||||||||
| Redemptions of common stock |
(3,655,496 | ) | (114,295 | ) | — | |||||||
| Offering costs |
(11,282,720 | ) | (9,488,920 | ) | (4,675,728 | ) | ||||||
| Escrow receivable |
120,154 | 508,710 | (809,214 | ) | ||||||||
| Due to affiliates |
483,737 | (509,159 | ) | 1,011,676 | ||||||||
| Distributions paid |
(8,429,845 | ) | (2,633,569 | ) | (187,898 | ) | ||||||
| Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests |
(324,582 | ) | (138,999 | ) | (8,530 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
106,192,928 | 68,060,180 | 19,831,475 | |||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(17,340,367 | ) | 21,163,826 | 2,413,632 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
23,778,458 | 2,614,632 | 201,000 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 6,438,091 | $ | 23,778,458 | $ | 2,614,632 | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosures and non-cash transactions: |
||||||||||||
| Cash paid for interest |
$ | 5,494,139 | $ | 1,350,752 | $ | 141,555 | ||||||
| Distributions payable |
$ | 1,557,367 | $ | 975,516 | $ | 113,306 | ||||||
| Issuance of shares pursuant to distribution reinvestment plan |
$ | 6,182,334 | $ | 1,799,785 | $ | 117,967 | ||||||
| Purchase of furniture and equipment |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 141,869 | ||||||
| Seller notes payable issued in connection with purchase of real estate |
$ | 4,800,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | — | ||||||
| Assumption of notes payable issued in connection with purchase of real estate |
$ | 3,199,696 | $ | 2,986,555 | $ | — | ||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment – Real estate facilities, net |
$ | 220,547 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Investing activities related to Merger Transactions and acquisitions of real estate: |
||||||||||||
| Real estate investments |
$ | — | $ | (99,917,829 | ) | $ | — | |||||
| Intangible assets |
$ | — | $ | (10,818,000 | ) | $ | — | |||||
| Investments in unconsolidated entities |
$ | — | $ | (8,889,783 | ) | $ | — | |||||
| Other assets |
$ | — | $ | (2,333,227 | ) | $ | — | |||||
| Other liabilities |
$ | — | $ | 2,795,006 | $ | — | ||||||
| Debt assumed |
$ | — | $ | 74,575,525 | $ | — | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interests |
$ | — | $ | 7,826,000 | $ | — | ||||||
| Common stock issued |
$ | — | $ | 37,475,000 | $ | — | ||||||
| Cash acquired in Merger Transactions |
$ | — | $ | 712,692 | $ | — | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Note 1. Organization
Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), was formed on August 14, 2007 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in self storage facilities. The Company’s year end is December 31. As used in this report, “we” “us” and “our” refer to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.
Strategic Capital Holdings, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (our “Sponsor”), is the sponsor of our initial public offering. Our Sponsor was formed on July 21, 2004 to engage in private structured offerings of limited partnerships and other entities with respect to the acquisition, management and disposition of commercial real estate assets. Our Sponsor owns a majority of Strategic Storage Holdings, LLC, which is the sole member of our advisor and our property manager.
Our advisor is Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (our “Advisor”) which was formed on August 13, 2007. Our Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf under the terms of an advisory agreement we have with our Advisor (our “Advisory Agreement”). Some of the officers of our Advisor are also officers of our Sponsor and of us.
On August 24, 2007, our Advisor purchased 100 shares of our common stock for $1,000 and became our initial stockholder. Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement authorize 700,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. We are currently offering a maximum of 110,000,000 shares of common stock, consisting of 100,000,000 shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”).
On March 17, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared our registration statement effective. On May 22, 2008, we satisfied the minimum offering requirements of the Primary Offering and commenced formal operations. As of December 31, 2010, in connection with our Offering, we had issued approximately 20.9 million shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $207.7 million. We intend to invest a substantial amount of the net proceeds from the Offering primarily in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments. We may continue to sell shares in the Offering until the earlier of 180 days after the third anniversary of the effective date of the Offering, September 17, 2011, or the effective date of the registration statement for our follow-on offering (SEC Registration No. 333-168905), which we initially filed with the SEC on August 17, 2010. We also reserve the right to terminate the Offering at any time. In addition to the Offering, in September 2009 we also issued approximately 6.2 million shares in connection with two mergers with private real estate investment trusts sponsored by our Sponsor (See Note 3).
Our dealer manager, U.S. Select Securities LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (our “Dealer Manager”) is an affiliate of our Sponsor. Our Dealer Manager is responsible for marketing our shares being offered pursuant to the Offering.
Our operating partnership, Strategic Storage Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (our “Operating Partnership”), was formed on August 14, 2007. On August 24, 2007, our Advisor purchased a limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership for $200,000 and on August 24, 2007, we contributed the initial $1,000 capital contribution we received to our Operating Partnership in exchange for the general partner interest. Our Operating Partnership owns, directly or
F-8
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
indirectly through one or more special purpose entities, all of the self storage properties that we have acquired. We will conduct certain activities (such as selling packing supplies and locks and renting trucks or other moving equipment) through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (the “TRSs”), which are our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Our property manager is Strategic Storage Property Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (our “Property Manager”), which was formed in August 2007 to manage our properties. Our Property Manager derives substantially all of its income from the property management services it performs for us.
As we accept subscriptions for shares of our common stock, we transfer substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering to our Operating Partnership as capital contributions in exchange for additional units of interest in our Operating Partnership. However, we are deemed to have made capital contributions in the amount of the gross offering proceeds received from investors and the Operating Partnership is deemed to have simultaneously paid the sales commissions and other costs associated with the Offering. In addition, our Operating Partnership is structured to make distributions with respect to limited partnership units that will be equivalent to the distributions made to holders of our common stock. Finally, a limited partner in our Operating Partnership may later exchange his or her limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership for shares of our common stock at any time after one year following the date of issuance of their limited partnership units, subject to certain restrictions as outlined in the limited partnership agreement. We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, and as of December 31, 2010 our Advisor was the only limited partner of our Operating Partnership. Our Advisor is prohibited from exchanging or otherwise transferring its limited partnership units so long as it is acting as our Advisor pursuant to our Advisory Agreement.
On September 25, 2008, we acquired our first two self storage facilities and as of December 31, 2010 we owned 45 self storage facilities. On September 24, 2009, through mergers with two private real estate investment trusts sponsored by our Sponsor, we acquired 11 of our wholly-owned facilities and certain preferred equity and/or minority interests described below. As of December 31, 2010, we wholly-owned 45 self storage facilities located in 15 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia) and Canada comprising approximately 31,640 units and approximately 3.9 million rentable square feet. We also had interests in 19 additional self storage facilities through preferred equity and/or minority interests. Of those interests, one has been deemed to be a controlling interest and is therefore consolidated in our consolidated financial statements as discussed in Note 2. Additionally, we have an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Effective September 15, 2009, the ASC was established as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Prior to the issuance of the ASC, all GAAP pronouncements were issued in separate topical pronouncements in the form of statements, staff positions or Emerging Issues Task Force
F-9
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Abstracts, and were referred to as such. While the ASC does not change GAAP, it introduces a new structure and supersedes all previously issued non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. In addition to the ASC, the Company is still required to follow SEC rules and regulations relating to the preparation of financial statements. The Company’s accounting policies are consistent with the guidance set forth by both ASC and the SEC.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported in our 2009 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2010 presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
Our financial statements, the financial statements of our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the financial statements of Self Storage REIT, Inc. (“REIT I”) and Self Storage REIT II, Inc. (“REIT II”), and the accounts of variable interest entities (VIEs) for which we are the primary beneficiary are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The portion of these entities not wholly-owned by us is presented as noncontrolling interests both as of and during the periods presented. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Consolidation Considerations for Our Investments in Joint Ventures
Recently amended accounting guidance provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of activities of the VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is an entity or other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. Generally, a VIE should be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual, or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) has the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must initially record all of the VIE’s assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interest at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were consolidated based on majority voting interest. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had entered into contracts/interests that are deemed to be variable interests in VIEs, those variable interests include both lease agreements and equity investments. We have evaluated those variable interests against the criteria for consolidation and determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of certain investments discussed further in the “Equity Investments” section of this note.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had an equity interest in a self storage property located in San Francisco, California (“SF property”) which was deemed to be a VIE of which we are the primary beneficiary. As such, the SF property has been consolidated in our consolidated financial statements since we acquired our interest in the property through the REIT I merger. In January 2010, we acquired an approximately 2% additional interest in the SF property, bringing our total interest to approximately 12%. The SF property is owned by a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST), and by virtue of the trust agreement the investors in the trust have no direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the DST’s significant activities. The REIT I operating partnership (the “REIT I Operating
F-10
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Partnership”) has also entered into a lease agreement for the SF property, in which the REIT I Operating Partnership is the tenant, which exposes it to losses of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE and also allows it to direct activities of the VIE that determine its economic performance by means of its operation of the leased facility. The lease has an initial term of ten years which commenced on December 19, 2006. The initial term of the lease may be extended at the option of the REIT I Operating Partnership for up to four successive five year terms. As of December 31, 2010, the consolidated joint venture had net real estate assets of approximately $17.2 million and net intangible assets of approximately $0.5 million. Such assets are only available to satisfy the obligations of the SF property. We have also consolidated approximately $10.2 million of secured promissory notes and approximately $6.7 million of noncontrolling interest related to this entity. The lenders of the secured promissory notes have no recourse to other Company assets. Our Sponsor has entered into an agreement to indemnify us for any losses as a result of potential shortfalls in the lease payments required to be made by the REIT I Operating Partnership. Despite such indemnification, we continue to be deemed the primary beneficiary as our Sponsor is not deemed to have a variable interest in the SF property.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. Management adjusts such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. The most significant estimates made include the allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, the determination if certain entities should be consolidated, the evaluation of potential impairment of long-lived assets and of assets held by equity method investees, and the useful lives of real estate assets and intangibles. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
We may maintain cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believe this risk is mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of impound reserve accounts for property taxes, insurance and capital improvements in connection with the requirements of certain of our loan agreements.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation
As of January 1, 2009, we account for acquisitions in accordance with amended accounting guidance which requires that we allocate the purchase price of the property to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. This guidance requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the acquisition date and to adjust those estimates as necessary during the measurement period (defined as the period, not to exceed one year, in which we may adjust the provisional amounts recognized for an acquisition). Acquisitions of portfolios of facilities are allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash
F-11
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which take into account the relative size, age, and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available. Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment, building and site improvements. In allocating the purchase price, we determine whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired properties are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. Accordingly, to date we have not allocated any portion of the purchase price to above or below market leases. We also consider whether in-place, market leases represent an intangible asset. We recorded approximately $8.6 million (including approximately $3.1 million related to provisional purchase accounting) and approximately $14.7 million in intangible assets to recognize the value of in-place leases related to our acquisitions in 2010 and 2009, respectively. We do not expect, nor to date have we recorded, intangible assets for the value of tenant relationships because we will not have concentrations of significant tenants and the average tenant turnover is fairly frequent. Our acquisition-related transaction costs are required to be expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we expensed approximately $5.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of acquisition related transaction costs.
Should the initial accounting for an acquisition be incomplete by the end of a reporting period that falls within the measurement period, we report provisional amounts in our financial statements. During the measurement period, we adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date and we record those adjustments to our financial statements. We apply those measurement period adjustments that we determine to be significant retrospectively to comparative information in our financial statements, potentially including adjustments to interest, depreciation and amortization expense.
Evaluation of Possible Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Management will continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, including those held through joint ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present that indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable, we will assess the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the long-lived assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived assets to the fair value and recognize an impairment loss. As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, no impairment losses have been recognized.
Equity Investments
Our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures and VIEs in which we are not the primary beneficiary, where we have significant influence, but not control, are recorded under the equity method of accounting in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Under the equity method, our investments in real estate ventures are stated at cost and adjusted for our share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings of real estate ventures is generally recognized based on the allocation of cash distributions upon liquidation of the investment in accordance with the joint venture agreements.
F-12
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Investments representing passive preferred equity and/or minority interests (less than 20%) are accounted for under the cost method. Under the cost method, our investments in real estate ventures are carried at cost and adjusted for other-than-temporary declines in fair value, distributions representing a return of capital and additional investments.
Through the mergers with REIT I and REIT II, we acquired five preferred equity and/or minority interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, all of which were deemed to be VIEs. We have evaluated each variable interest against the amended criteria for consolidation and determined that we are not the primary beneficiary, generally due to our inability to direct significant activities that determine the economic performance of the VIE. Four of those investments were passive or limited partner interests in self storage facilities, (three of which properties are owned by DSTs, and by virtue of the related trust agreements, the investors have no direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the DSTs significant activities) and are therefore accounted for under the cost method; our aggregate investment therein is approximately $3.5 million. Individually our ownership interest in those investments ranges from .28% to 19.8%; the carrying value of the investments ranged from approximately $27,000 to $2,800,000 and our risk of loss is limited to our individual investment therein.
The remaining interest is in a net leased industrial property (“Hawthorne property”) in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and our risk of loss is limited to our investment, including our maximum exposure under the terms of a debt guarantee. We own a 12% interest in Westport LAX LLC, the joint venture that acquired the Hawthorne property. Hawthorne LLC, an affiliate of our Sponsor, owns 78% of Westport LAX LLC, and we have a preferred equity interest in Hawthorne LLC which entitles us to distributions equal to 10% per annum on our investment of approximately $6.6 million. The preferred equity interest has a redemption date in November 2011, subject to extension at our sole discretion. The preferred equity interest may be called at any time in whole or part by Hawthorne LLC or redeemed at any time by us. The remaining 10% interest in Westport LAX LLC is owned by a third party, who is also the co-manager, along with our Sponsor, of the Hawthorne property. Such third party is the acting property manager and directs the operating activities of the property that determine its economic performance. We, along with other non-affiliated parties, are guarantors on the approximately $19.9 million loan used to secure the Hawthorne property; the loan has a maturity date of August 1, 2020. As of December 31, 2010, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this VIE, consisting of our investment balance and our guarantee of the secured debt, totaled approximately $26.5 million.
Revenue Recognition
Management believes that all of our leases are operating leases. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues from any long-term operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents received over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and contractually due but unpaid rent is included in other assets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Tenant accounts receivable are reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Management’s estimate of the allowance is based upon a review of the current status of tenant accounts receivable. It is reasonably possible that management’s estimate of the allowance will change in the future.
F-13
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Depreciation of Real Property Assets
Our management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives.
Depreciation of our real property assets is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as follows:
| Description |
Standard Depreciable Life | |
| Land |
Not Depreciated | |
| Buildings |
25 to 40 years | |
| Site Improvements |
7 to 15 years |
Depreciation of Personal Property Assets
Personal property assets, consisting primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 5 years, and are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
Intangible Assets
We have allocated a portion of our real estate purchase price to in-place leases. We are amortizing in-place leases on a straight-line basis over the estimated future benefit period. As of December 31, 2010 and, 2009, accumulated amortization of in-place lease intangibles totaled approximately $10.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
The total estimated amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 is approximately $10 million, $3.5 million, $0.5 million, $50,000 and $50,000, respectively.
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs
Costs incurred in connection with obtaining financing are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan, which is not materially different than the effective interest method. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs totaled approximately $402,000 and $88,000, respectively.
Organizational and Offering Costs
Our Advisor may fund organization and offering costs on our behalf. We are required to reimburse our Advisor for such organization and offering costs; provided, however, our Advisor must reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which the Offering terminates to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. Such costs will be recognized as a liability when we have a present responsibility to reimburse our Advisor, which is defined in our Advisory Agreement as the date we satisfied the minimum offering requirements of the Primary Offering (which occurred on May 22, 2008). If at any point in time we determine that the total organization and offering costs are expected to exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds anticipated to be received from the Primary Offering, we will recognize such excess as a capital contribution from our
F-14
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Advisor. As of December 31, 2010, we do not believe total organization and offering costs will exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds anticipated to be received from the Primary Offering. Offering costs are recorded as an offset to additional paid-in capital, and organization costs are recorded as an expense.
Redeemable Common Stock
We have adopted a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances.
There are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares under the share redemption program including, but not limited to:
| • | Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” (as defined under the share redemption program) or bankruptcy, we may not redeem shares until the stockholder has held his or her shares for one year. |
| • | During any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. |
| • | The cash available for redemption is limited to the proceeds from the sale of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. |
| • | We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. |
See Note 7 for further discussion of our share redemption program.
Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program with 30 days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or by a separate mailing to our stockholders.
We record amounts that are redeemable under the share redemption program as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets since the shares are mandatorily redeemable at the option of the holder and therefore their redemption is outside our control. The maximum amount redeemable under our share redemption program is limited to the number of shares we could repurchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan. However, accounting guidance states that determinable amounts that can become redeemable but that are contingent on an event that is likely to occur (e.g., the passage of time) should be presented as redeemable when such amount is known. Therefore, the net proceeds from the distribution reinvestment plan are considered to be temporary equity and are presented as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In addition, current accounting guidance requires, among other things, that financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation of us to repurchase shares be classified as liabilities and reported at settlement value. Our redeemable common shares are contingently redeemable at the option of the holder. When we determine we have a mandatory obligation to repurchase shares under the share redemption program, we will reclassify such obligations from temporary equity to a liability based upon their respective settlement values.
During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we redeemed 381,834 shares for approximately $3.7 million and 11,916 shares for approximately $0.1 million, respectively. As of
F-15
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2010, there were approximately 203,000 shares that were requested to be redeemed but could not be as we had reached our annual maximum redemption amount under our share redemption program. Pursuant to the share redemption program, when qualifying requests exceed the then remaining amount available to be redeemed all such pending requests are redeemed on a pro rata basis. The aforementioned shares not redeemed, as well any additional qualifying requests received in the first quarter of 2011, will be treated as requests for redemption in the first quarter of 2011.
Foreign Currency Translation
For non-U.S. functional currency operations, assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates for the period. All related adjustments are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the related operation are recorded at rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded in other income (expense). In the year ending December 31, 2010 there was a net gain recorded of approximately $106,000. There was no such activity in 2009 or 2008.
Accounting for Equity Awards
The cost of restricted stock is required to be measured based on the grant-date fair value and the cost to be recognized over the relevant service period.
Fair Value Measurements
The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs and hierarchy of fair value we use when measuring fair value:
| • | Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access; |
| • | Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and |
| • | Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions as there is little, if any, related market activity. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement will fall within the lowest level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and
F-16
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the fair values we present herein are indicative of amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or other disposition of these assets.
Financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements consist of real estate and related assets and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and related liabilities assumed and common stock issued related to acquisitions we made during 2010 and 2009. The fair values of these assets, liabilities and common stock were determined as of the acquisition dates using widely accepted valuation techniques, including (i) discounted cash flow analysis, which considers, among other things, leasing assumptions, growth rates, discount rates and terminal capitalization rates, (ii) income capitalization approach, which considers prevailing market capitalization rates, and (iii) comparable sales activity. In general, we consider multiple valuation techniques when measuring fair values. However, in certain circumstances, a single valuation technique may be appropriate. All of the fair values of the assets, liabilities and common stock as of the acquisition dates were derived using Level 3 inputs.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, tenant accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, distributions payable and amounts due to affiliates approximate fair value because of the relatively short-term nature of these instruments.
The table below summarizes our fixed rate notes payable at December 31, 2010. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and is dependent on a number of important assumptions, including discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The fair value of the fixed rate notes payable was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
| Fair Value | Carrying Value | |||||||
| Fixed Rate Secured Promissory Notes |
$ | 117,993,000 | $ | 114,872,393 | ||||
Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Entities
We account for the noncontrolling interest in our Operating Partnership in accordance with amended accounting guidance. Due to our control through our general partnership interest in our Operating Partnership and the limited rights of the limited partner, our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is consolidated with the Company and the limited partner interest is reflected as a noncontrolling interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interest was initially reported as the $200,000 capital investment from the Advisor and was subsequently adjusted for the limited partner’s share of losses and distributions. In addition, we account for the noncontrolling interest in the SF property in accordance with the amended accounting guidance. The noncontrolling interests shall continue to be attributed their share of income and losses, even if that attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance.
F-17
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Income Taxes
We made an election to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we will be organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition or disclosure in our consolidated financial statements.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
We have filed an election to treat the TRSs as taxable REIT subsidiaries. In general, the TRSs may perform additional services for our tenants and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business. The TRSs are subject to corporate federal and state income tax. The TRSs follow accounting guidance which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes will represent the tax effect of future differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share attributable for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, including all restricted stock grants as though fully vested. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 6,875, 6,250 and 0 shares, respectively, of unvested restricted stock were not included in the diluted weighted average shares as such shares were antidilutive.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. This amended guidance requires an enterprise to evaluate former qualified special purpose entities for consolidation, changes the approach to determining a VIE’s primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment designed to identify a controlling financial interest, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. It also clarifies, but does not significantly change, the characteristics that identify a VIE. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard effective January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
F-18
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
In June 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to accounting for transfers of financial assets, which requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The amended guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard effective January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance related to accounting for distributions with components of both stock and cash. This amended guidance clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limit on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard effective January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 3. Merger with Private REITs
On September 24, 2009, we closed on two mergers with REIT I and REIT II, two private real estate investment trusts sponsored by our Sponsor (“Merger Transactions”). The Merger Transactions contained a closing condition requiring REIT I and REIT II, the acquired entities, to obtain any and all consents required by loan documents relating to properties owned by them. Without acknowledging whether consent was required, REIT I and REIT II attempted to notify or obtain consent from the various loan servicers for each property. In light of the structure of the Merger Transactions whereby the legal structure of REIT I and REIT II and each special purpose entity borrower remained unchanged and the length of time it was taking the loan servicers to take definitive action, our board of directors and the boards of directors of REIT I and REIT II decided to waive this last remaining closing condition and proceed to close the Merger Transactions. All but one of the loan consents have been obtained and we are uncertain as to when the remaining consent will be received, if at all.
We exchanged 1.05 and 1.0 shares of our common stock for each 1.0 share of REIT I and REIT II common stock, respectively, as consideration for the Merger Transactions.
Through the Merger Transactions we acquired 11 wholly-owned self storage facilities in Alabama, California, Florida, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, comprising approximately 8,395 units and approximately 1.2 million rentable square feet, including drive-up, climate-controlled, RV, store-front and office units. We also acquired preferred equity and/or minority interests in 19 self storage facilities located in Alabama, California, Georgia, North Carolina, Maryland and Texas, comprising approximately 11,550 units and approximately 1.4 million rentable square feet, and an interest in a net leased industrial property in California with 356,000 rentable square feet leased to a single tenant.
In connection with the REIT I Merger Transaction, our Advisor was reimbursed $250,000 for its actual costs associated with the transaction.
F-19
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
The following summarizes the final purchase price accounting for assets and liabilities assumed in the Merger Transactions:
| Description |
||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 712,692 | ||
| Real estate facilities |
92,440,000 | |||
| Intangible assets |
10,818,000 | |||
| Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
8,889,783 | |||
| Other assets |
2,333,227 | |||
| Other liabilities |
(2,795,006 | ) | ||
| Secured promissory notes |
(67,097,696 | ) | ||
| Noncontrolling interest |
(7,826,000 | ) | ||
| Total allocated purchase price to net assets acquired |
$ | 37,475,000 | ||
Note 4. Acquisitions of Real Estate Facilities
The following summarizes the activity in real estate facilities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| Real estate facilities |
||||
| Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 15,166,724 | ||
| Facility acquisitions |
47,285,652 | |||
| Mergers |
92,440,000 | |||
| Improvements and additions |
165,984 | |||
| Balance at December 31, 2009 |
155,058,360 | |||
| Facility acquisitions |
117,365,329 | |||
| Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
220,547 | |||
| Improvements and additions |
1,923,964 | |||
| Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 274,568,200 | ||
| Accumulated depreciation |
||||
| Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | (89,516 | ) | |
| Depreciation expense |
(1,643,642 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2009 |
(1,733,158 | ) | ||
| Depreciation expense |
(4,943,856 | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | (6,677,014 | ) | |
F-20
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
2010 and 2009 Acquisitions
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation for our acquisitions, excluding the Merger Transactions for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| Property |
Acquisition Date |
Real Estate Assets |
Intangibles | Other Assets |
Total | Debt Assumed or Issued (1) |
Revenue (2) |
Operating Income (2) (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Walton – Walton, KY |
2/12/2009 | $ | 3,284,959 | $ | 366,410 | $ | 3,305 | $ | 3,654,674 | $ | 1,707,412 | $ | 344,229 | $ | 181,082 | |||||||||||||||||
| Crescent Springs – Crescent Springs, KY |
2/12/2009 | 1,917,801 | 208,667 | 1,398 | 2,127,866 | 763,074 | 275,551 | 134,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florence – Florence, KY |
2/12/2009 | 3,531,629 | 375,811 | 2,309 | 3,909,749 | 1,821,803 | 450,458 | 272,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alpharetta – Alpharetta, GA |
6/1/2009 | 4,812,736 | 560,000 | 5,670 | 5,378,406 | — | 368,436 | 192,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marietta – Marietta, GA |
6/1/2009 | 3,765,806 | 450,000 | 5,788 | 4,221,594 | — | 367,779 | 194,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Erlanger – Erlanger, KY |
7/17/2009 | 3,029,059 | 392,575 | 3,783 | 3,425,417 | — | 228,811 | 122,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florence II – Florence, KY |
7/17/2009 | 5,748,225 | 522,938 | 3,420 | 6,274,583 | — | 365,413 | 211,328 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey City – Jersey City, NJ |
8/21/2009 | 10,625,000 | 974,681 | 25,319 | 11,625,000 | — | 558,186 | 312,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montgomery – Montgomery, AL |
9/3/2009 | 3,587,773 | 209,713 | 2,514 | 3,800,000 | 2,977,829 | 138,159 | 83,924 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix – Phoenix, AZ |
9/4/2009 | 1,940,000 | 59,106 | 894 | 2,000,000 | — | 56,551 | 2,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pittsburgh – Pittsburgh, PA |
12/11/2009 | 2,059,214 | 303,668 | — | 2,362,882 | — | 24,441 | 6,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Mifflin – West Mifflin, PA |
12/11/2009 | 2,983,450 | 353,668 | — | 3,337,118 | — | 36,359 | 9,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 Total |
$ | 47,285,652 | $ | 4,777,237 | $ | 54,400 | $ | 52,117,289 | $ | 7,270,118 | $ | 3,214,373 | $ | 1,723,384 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fort Lee – Fort Lee, NJ |
2/24/2010 | $ | 15,630,000 | $ | 1,120,000 | $ | — | $ | 16,750,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,763,474 | $ | 1,158,408 | |||||||||||||||||
| Weston – Weston, FL |
2/24/2010 | 5,830,000 | 470,000 | — | 6,300,000 | — | 778,423 | 469,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gulf Breeze II – Gulf Breeze, FL |
3/10/2010 | 1,165,000 | 60,000 | — | 1,225,000 | — | 142,187 | 46,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mesa – Mesa, AZ |
4/9/2010 | 3,233,728 | 320,000 | 39,827 | 3,593,555 | 3,118,251 | 381,055 | 188,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oakland Park – Oakland Park, FL |
4/16/2010 | 13,260,000 | 1,090,000 | — | 14,350,000 | — | 1,294,139 | 829,414 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tempe – Tempe, AZ |
5/6/2010 | 1,640,000 | 160,000 | — | 1,800,000 | — | 220,080 | 108,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix II – Phoenix, AZ |
5/6/2010 | 1,535,000 | 165,000 | — | 1,700,000 | — | 225,020 | 126,373 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Riverdale – Riverdale, NJ |
5/14/2010 | 5,844,357 | 190,000 | — | 6,034,357 | 4,459,357 | 413,951 | 156,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Davie – Davie, FL |
7/14/2010 | 4,880,000 | 590,000 | — | 5,470,000 | — | 505,737 | 286,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago – 95th St. – Chicago, IL |
10/22/2010 | 5,830,000 | 470,000 | — | 6,300,000 | — | 189,474 | 109,157 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago – Western Ave. – Chicago, IL |
10/22/2010 | 1,300,000 | 100,000 | — | 1,400,000 | — | 96,040 | 36,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago – Ogden Ave. – Chicago, IL |
10/26/2010 | 3,470,000 | 530,000 | — | 4,000,000 | — | 175,883 | 66,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas III – Las Vegas, NV |
10/29/2010 | 4,115,000 | 160,000 | — | 4,275,000 | — | 73,974 | 30,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F-21
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
| Property |
Acquisition Date |
Real Estate Assets |
Intangibles | Other Assets |
Total | Debt Assumed or Issued (1) |
Revenue (2) |
Operating Income (2) (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago – Roosevelt Rd. – Chicago, IL |
11/16/2010 | 1,710,000 | 90,000 | — | 1,800,000 | — | 69,920 | 26,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dufferin – Toronto – Ontario, Canada |
11/23/2010 | 13,697,244 | 452,756 | — | 14,150,000 | — | 116,121 | 50,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| La Cienega – LA – Los Angeles, CA |
12/16/2010 | 12,250,000 | 850,000 | — | 13,100,000 | — | 57,553 | 28,621 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long Beach – Long Beach, CA |
12/16/2010 | 11,850,000 | 1,050,000 | — | 12,900,000 | — | 65,180 | 36,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas IV – Las Vegas, NV |
12/21/2010 | 6,305,000 | 570,000 | — | 6,875,000 | — | 21,403 | 8,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas VI – Las Vegas, NV |
12/29/2010 | 3,820,000 | 180,000 | — | 4,000,000 | — | 2,658 | (5,054 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 Total |
$ | 117,365,329 | $ | 8,617,756 | $ | 39,827 | $ | 126,022,912 | $ | 7,577,608 | $ | 6,592,272 | $ | 3,758,143 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | - See Note 5 for specific terms of the Company’s debt. |
| (2) | - The operating results of the facilities acquired above have been included in the Company’s statement of operations since their respective acquisition date. The revenue and operating income in the table above represents such metrics from the respective acquisition date through the end of the respective fiscal year. |
| (3) | - Operating income excludes asset management fees, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense. |
All of the above transactions were acquired from unaffiliated third parties.
Total acquisition fees paid to our Advisor for the above acquisitions for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $3,161,000 and $1,308,000, respectively.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company finalized the purchase price accounting for the 2010 acquisitions purchased through November 16, 2010, and made revisions to preliminary estimates including real estate facilities and intangible assets as further evaluations were completed and additional information was received from third parties subsequent to the acquisition dates. The purchase price accounting for the remaining 2010 acquisitions will be finalized within the measurement period as further evaluations are completed and additional information obtained.
For the 2010 acquisitions where the purchase price accounting was finalized, the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations and the adjustments required upon finalization of the purchase price accounting to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the respective acquisition dates:
| Preliminary | Measurement Period Adjustments |
Final | ||||||||||
| Real estate facilities |
$ | 67,537,357 | $ | 1,905,728 | $ | 69,443,085 | ||||||
| Intangible assets |
7,542,000 | (2,027,000 | ) | 5,515,000 | ||||||||
| Other assets |
— | 39,827 | 39,827 | |||||||||
| Secured promissory notes |
(7,659,053 | ) | 81,445 | (7,577,608 | ) | |||||||
| Total allocated purchase price to net assets acquired |
$ | 67,420,304 | $ | — | $ | 67,420,304 | ||||||
In accordance with accounting guidance, the quarterly information disclosed in Note 10 has been revised to reflect the finalization of purchase price accounting retroactive to the date of acquisition.
F-22
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
For acquisitions where the purchase price accounting was finalized in 2010 the weighted-average amortization period of the intangibles as of the date of acquisition was 21 months. The weighted-average amortization period of the intangibles acquired in 2009, excluding the properties acquired in the Merger Transactions, as of the acquisition date was 28 months.
Note 5. Secured Promissory Notes
The Company’s secured promissory notes are summarized as follows:
| Carrying value as of: | Stated Interest Rate |
Maturity Date |
||||||||||||||
| Encumbered Property | December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||
| Crescent Springs |
$ | 800,000 | $ | 800,000 | 5.00 | % | 2/11/2014 | |||||||||
| Florence, Walton |
3,700,000 | 3,700,000 | 5.00 | % | 2/11/2014 | |||||||||||
| Biloxi, Gulf Breeze |
4,939,555 | 4,975,000 | 6.50 | %(1) | 4/1/2012 | |||||||||||
| Montgomery |
2,905,005 | 2,967,038 | 6.42 | % | 7/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Seabrook |
4,648,475 | 4,709,307 | 5.73 | % | 1/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Greenville |
2,329,399 | 2,359,937 | 5.65 | % | 3/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Kemah |
9,086,648 | 9,191,016 | 6.20 | % | 6/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Memphis |
2,572,089 | 2,604,000 | 5.67 | % | 12/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Tallahassee |
7,650,000 | 7,650,000 | 6.16 | % | 8/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Houston |
2,087,590 | 2,119,313 | 5.67 | % | 2/1/2017 | |||||||||||
| San Francisco (consolidated VIE) |
10,500,000 | 10,500,000 | 5.84 | % | 12/1/2016 | |||||||||||
| Lake Forest |
18,000,000 | 18,000,000 | 6.47 | % | 10/1/2017 | |||||||||||
| Las Vegas I |
1,540,000 | 1,540,000 | 5.72 | % | 6/1/2017 | |||||||||||
| Pearland |
3,500,000 | 3,500,000 | 5.93 | % | 7/1/2017 | |||||||||||
| Daphne |
1,844,445 | 1,982,622 | 5.47 | % | 8/1/2020 | |||||||||||
| Mesa |
3,161,123 | — | 5.38 | % | 4/1/2015 | |||||||||||
| Riverdale |
4,800,000 | — | 4.00 | % | 5/14/2014 | |||||||||||
| Prudential Portfolio Loan(2) |
32,475,887 | — | 5.42 | %(3) | 9/5/2019 | |||||||||||
| Long Beach |
5,000,000 | — | 10.00 | %(4) | 1/31/2011 | |||||||||||
| Loans maturing after 12/31/09 |
— | 3,255,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Net fair value adjustment |
(1,728,268 | ) | (1,596,650 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans and notes payable |
$ | 119,811,948 | $ | 78,256,583 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | The interest rate on this debt resets monthly, based on three-month LIBOR plus 450 basis points (4.5%) and has a floor of 6.50%. The rate in effect as of December 31, 2010 was 6.50%. In January 2011, this loan was paid in full. |
| (2) | This portfolio loan is comprised of 11 discrete mortgage loans on 11 respective properties (Manassas, Marietta, Erlanger, Pittsburgh, Weston, Fort Lee, Oakland Park, Tempe, Phoenix II, Davie, Las Vegas II). Each of the individual loans is cross-collateralized by the other ten. |
| (3) | Ten of the loans in this portfolio loan bear an interest rate of 5.43% and the remaining loan bears an interest rate of 5.31%. The weighted average interest rate of this portfolio is 5.42%. |
| (4) | On December 20, 2010, we encumbered the Long Beach property with a loan for a total principal amount of $5.0 million. In January 2011, this loan was paid in full. |
F-23
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s secured promissory notes shown above were secured by the properties shown above, which properties had net book values of approximately $192.5 million and $127.4 million, respectively.
On August 25, 2010, through certain property-owning special purpose entities, we entered into a loan agreement and various promissory notes in connection with eleven individual loans obtained from The Prudential Insurance Company of America (collectively, the “Prudential Portfolio Loan”) for a total principal amount of approximately $32.6 million. The proceeds from the Prudential Portfolio Loan were used to make future acquisitions of self storage facilities. Each of the individual loans comprising the Prudential Portfolio Loan has a term of nine years and matures on September 5, 2019. Ten of the loans bear a fixed interest rate of 5.43% per annum, and the remaining loan bears a fixed interest rate of 5.31% per annum, all on a 30-year amortization schedule. Payments of principal and interest are due on a monthly basis, and we may prepay all or any portion of the Prudential Portfolio Loan upon 30 days’ written notice, subject to a prepayment premium.
Each of the loans is secured by a first priority mortgage or deed of trust on one of the encumbered properties and carries with it a Promissory Note, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Supplemental Guaranty and Recourse Liabilities Guaranty. The terms of these five agreements are identical other than information that specifically relates to the properties individually. The Prudential Portfolio Loan contains a number of other customary terms and covenants.
The following table presents the future principal payment requirements on outstanding secured promissory notes at December 31, 2010:
| 2011 |
$ | 6,084,313 | ||
| 2012 |
8,679,971 | |||
| 2013 |
1,404,411 | |||
| 2014 |
8,287,214 | |||
| 2015 |
4,397,215 | |||
| 2016 and thereafter |
92,687,092 | |||
| Total payments |
121,540,216 | |||
| Unamortized fair value adjustment |
(1,728,268 | ) | ||
| Total |
$ | 119,811,948 | ||
We record the amortization of debt discounts related to fair value adjustments to interest expense. The weighted average interest rate of our fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 5.92%.
Note 6. Related Party Transactions
Fees to Affiliates
Our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor and dealer manager agreement (“Dealer Manager Agreement”) with our Dealer Manager entitle our Advisor and our Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and investment of funds in real estate properties, among other services, as well as reimbursement for organizational and offering costs incurred
F-24
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
by our Advisor on our behalf and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by our Advisor in providing services to us.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements described above, the following summarizes the related party costs incurred for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
||||||||||
| Expensed |
||||||||||||
| Reimbursement of operating expenses |
$ | 850,691 | $ | 761,117 | $ | 1,206,272 | ||||||
| Asset management fees |
1,400,962 | 474,010 | 32,067 | |||||||||
| Property management fees |
1,266,395 | 383,854 | 22,418 | |||||||||
| Acquisition fees and acquisition expenses |
3,206,832 | 1,564,792 | — | |||||||||
| Capitalized |
||||||||||||
| Acquisition fees |
69,016 | (1) | — | 419,700 | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets |
— | — | 184,282 | |||||||||
| Additional Paid-in Capital |
||||||||||||
| Selling commissions |
6,681,016 | 5,699,761 | 1,443,133 | |||||||||
| Dealer management fee |
2,863,292 | 2,442,755 | 618,486 | |||||||||
| Reimbursements of offering costs |
435,712 | 328,917 | 2,614,110 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 16,773,916 | $ | 11,655,206 | $ | 6,540,468 | ||||||
| (1) | Acquisition fees paid to our Advisor in connection with the additional investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. |
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had amounts due to affiliates totaling $746,108 and $610,110, respectively.
Organizational and Offering Costs
Organizational and offering costs of the Offering may be paid by our Advisor on our behalf and will be reimbursed to our Advisor from the proceeds of the Offering. Organizational and offering costs consist of all expenses (other than sales commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with the Offering, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charges of our escrow holder and other accountable offering expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse our Advisor for all marketing related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of our Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our shares; (ii) technology costs associated with the Offering; (iii) our costs of conducting our training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v) payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. Our Advisor must reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month which the Offering terminates to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering.
F-25
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Advisory Agreement
We do not expect to have any employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the directives of our board of directors. Our Advisor receives various fees and expenses under the terms of our Advisory Agreement. As discussed above, we are required under our Advisory Agreement to reimburse our Advisor for organization and offering costs; provided, however, our Advisor must reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which the Offering terminates to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. As of December 31, 2010, we do not believe that total organizational and offering costs will exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds anticipated to be received from the Primary Offering. Our Advisory Agreement also requires our Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering expenses are in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the Offering. Our Advisor receives acquisition fees equal to 2.5% of the contract purchase price of each property we acquire plus reimbursement of any acquisition expenses the Advisor incurs. Our Advisor also receives a monthly asset management fee for managing our assets equal to 0.0833% of the aggregate asset value, as defined, of our assets. The monthly asset management fees for our properties acquired through our September 24, 2009 mergers are equal to 2.0% of the gross revenues from the properties and are paid to affiliates of our Sponsor. Under our Advisory Agreement, our Advisor receives fees in an amount equal to up to one-half of the total real estate commission paid but in no event to exceed an amount equal to 3.0% of the contract sale price for each property we sell as long as our Advisor provides substantial assistance in connection with the sale. The total disposition fees paid (including fees paid to third parties) may not exceed the lesser of a competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract sale price of the property. Our Advisor may also be entitled to various subordinated fees if we (1) list our shares of common stock on a national exchange, (2) terminate our Advisory Agreement, or (3) liquidate our portfolio. The advisors of REIT I and REIT II are entitled to various fees related to their properties if we (1) dispose of a property, (2) liquidate our portfolio, or (3) terminate their advisory agreement.
Our Advisory Agreement provides for reimbursement of our Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. Beginning October 1, 2009 (four fiscal quarters after the acquisition of our first real estate asset), our Advisor must pay or reimburse us the amount by which our aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income, as defined, unless a majority of our independent directors determine that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For any fiscal quarter for which total operating expenses for the 12 months then ended exceed the limitation, we will disclose this fact in our next quarterly report or within 60 days of the end of that quarter and send a written disclosure of this fact to our stockholders. In each case the disclosure will include an explanation of the factors that the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the excess expenses were justified. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2010, our aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, did not exceed the thresholds described above.
Dealer Manager Agreement
Our Dealer Manager receives a sales commission of up to 7.0% of gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering and a dealer manager fee equal to up to 3.0% of gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering under the terms of our Dealer Manager Agreement. Our Dealer Manager has entered into participating dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers which authorizes them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager will re-allow all of the sales commissions paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager may also
F-26
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of the 3.0% dealer manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses. Our Dealer Manager also receives reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses up to 0.5% of the gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering.
Property Management Agreement
Our Property Manager receives a fee for its services in managing our properties, except for those properties acquired in the REIT I merger transaction, generally equal to 6.0% of the gross revenues from the properties plus reimbursement of the direct costs of managing the properties under our property management agreement. The properties acquired in the REIT I merger transaction are managed by an affiliate of our Sponsor and a portion of those property management fees were paid to a third party property manager. As a condition of the REIT II merger transaction, the monthly property management fees for properties acquired through the REIT II merger transaction have been waived until the FFO, as defined in the merger agreement relating to the REIT II merger transaction, reaches $0.70 per share. In the event that our Property Manager assists with the development or redevelopment of a property, we may pay a separate market-based fee for such services.
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan that allows our stockholders to have distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our common stock. We have registered 10,000,000 shares of common stock for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. The plan became effective on the effective date of our initial public offering. The purchase price per share is to be the higher of $9.50 per share or 95% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock. No sales commission or dealer manager fee will be paid on shares sold through the distribution reinvestment plan. We may amend or terminate the distribution reinvestment plan for any reason at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. As of December 31, 2010, we have sold 852,640 shares through our distribution reinvestment plan.
Share Redemption Program
We have adopted a share redemption program that enables our stockholders to sell their stock to us in limited circumstances. As long as our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market, our stockholders who have held their stock for at least one year may be able to have all or any portion of their shares of stock redeemed by us. We may redeem the shares of stock presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to fund such redemption. The amount that we may pay to redeem stock is expected to be the redemption price set forth in the following table which is based upon the number of years the stock is held:
| Number Years Held |
Redemption Price | |
| Less than 1 |
No Redemption Allowed | |
| 1 or more but less than 2 |
92.5% of purchase price | |
| 2 or more but less than 3 |
95.0% of purchase price | |
| 3 or more but less than 4 |
97.5% of purchase price | |
| 4 or more |
100.0% of purchase price |
F-27
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
The purchase price shall equal the amount paid for the shares until the price in the Primary Offering changes or a net asset value is calculated. The redemption price is subject to adjustment as determined from time to time by our board of directors. At no time will the redemption price exceed the price at which we are offering our common stock for sale.
See Note 2 for further discussion of redeemable common stock and our share redemption program.
Operating Partnership Redemption Rights
The limited partners of our Operating Partnership will have the right to cause our Operating Partnership to redeem their limited partnership units for cash equal to the value of an equivalent number of our shares, or, at our option, we may purchase their limited partnership units by issuing one share of our common stock for each limited partnership unit redeemed. These rights may not be exercised under certain circumstances which could cause us to lose our REIT election. Furthermore, limited partners may exercise their redemption rights only after their limited partnership units have been outstanding for one year. Our Advisor is prohibited from exchanging or otherwise transferring its limited partnership units so long as it is acting as our Advisor pursuant to our Advisory Agreement.
Las Vegas III and VI Properties
We purchased these properties through judicial foreclosure proceedings. We have been advised by local counsel that, although the court ordered that the original property owners (the “borrowers”) would have no right of redemption, pursuant to Nevada law, the borrowers may still have the right to elect to redeem the properties during a one-year period following the date the properties were sold at foreclosure. Should either borrower elect to redeem their properties within one year following the foreclosure sale, we may be obligated to return the property to the borrower, provided certain other conditions are met, including repayment of our purchase price. Although the borrowers may have a right to redeem, we believe that it is highly unlikely that this will occur.
La Cienega – LA Property Conditional Use Permit
Our use of the La Cienega - LA property as a self storage facility is subject to a Conditional Use Permit granted by the Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning which must be renewed six months prior to the current termination date in 2012. We and the seller of the La Cienega - LA property have entered into agreements whereby it is the seller’s responsibility to apply for and obtain approval of the permit renewal. If the renewal application is not approved, we may force the seller to repurchase the property from us on certain terms and conditions. As part of the permit renewal process and right to purchase, the seller has put $500,000 into an escrow account, which amounts may be withdrawn subject to certain conditions.
Note 8. Declaration of Distributions
On December 16, 2010, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the first quarter of 2011 of $0.00191781 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock (equivalent to an annual distribution rate of 7% assuming the share was purchased for $10) payable to stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on January 1, 2011 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including March 31, 2011.
F-28
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Note 9. Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The table set forth below summarizes on an unaudited pro forma basis the combined results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as if the Company’s acquisitions discussed in Notes 3 and 4 were completed as of January 1, 2010 and 2009. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been for the periods indicated, nor do they purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.
The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 based on the assumptions described above:
| Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
| Pro forma revenue |
$ | 36,211,885 | $ | 35,228,744 | ||||
| Pro forma operating expenses |
$ | 39,013,528 | $ | 39,135,310 | ||||
| Pro forma net loss attributable to the Company |
$ | (14,840,795 | ) | $ | (18,958,466 | ) | ||
| Pro forma net loss per common share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.55 | ) | $ | (0.75 | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
27,056,820 | 25,445,932 | ||||||
Note 10. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years ended December, 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
| Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) March 31, 2010 |
(1) June 30, 2010 |
(1) September 30, 2010 |
(1) December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
| Total revenues |
$ | 5,150,232 | $ | 6,312,933 | $ | 6,937,875 | $ | 7,760,142 | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses |
$ | 6,159,498 | $ | 6,979,505 | $ | 7,390,800 | $ | 8,235,578 | ||||||||
| Net loss |
$ | (3,275,180 | ) | $ | (2,708,719 | ) | $ | (2,310,354 | ) | $ | (4,952,762 | ) | ||||
| Net loss attributable to the Company |
$ | (3,167,991 | ) | $ | (2,589,556 | ) | $ | (2,199,012 | ) | $ | (4,834,256 | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share-basic and diluted |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||
| (1) | – As discussed in Note 4, the Company completed its purchase price accounting for certain current year acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2010. Accounting guidance requires the Company to revise previously reported financial information as if the purchase price accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date. Such revisions to operating expenses, related to increased depreciation and amortization expense, resulted in additional expenses of $5,057, $9,314 and $36,674 for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2010, respectively. Net income was further revised, as interest expense was increased by $2,514 and $3,837 for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2010, respectively. |
F-29
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
| Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2009 |
June 30, 2009 |
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
| Total revenues |
$ | 582,436 | $ | 822,520 | $ | 1,755,600 | $ | 4,714,587 | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses |
$ | 1,117,333 | $ | 1,462,534 | $ | 2,305,635 | $ | 5,269,041 | ||||||||
| Net loss |
$ | (1,281,051 | ) | $ | (2,822,790 | ) | $ | (2,368,402 | ) | $ | (932,276 | ) | ||||
| Net loss attributable to the Company |
$ | (1,271,480 | ) | $ | (1,841,945 | ) | $ | (1,993,751 | ) | $ | (2,195,720 | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share-basic and diluted |
$ | (0.49 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||
Note 11. Subsequent Events
Acquisitions
USA Self Storage I, DST
On February 1, 2011, we through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, closed on the purchase of an additional 73.824% in beneficial interests (the “Interests”) in USA Self Storage I, DST (the “DST”), a Delaware Statutory Trust sponsored by our Sponsor, from 36 third-party sellers pursuant to separate purchase agreements with each seller. None of the purchases was contingent upon any of the others. The agreed upon purchase price of the properties relating to the Interests acquired was approximately $27.7 million ($37.55 million total purchase price multiplied by 73.824%), consisting of $10.2 million in cash and the ratable portion of approximately $17.5 million of three separate bank loans held by the three property owning subtrusts (the “Subtrusts”) of the DST (the “Bank of America Loans”).
The acquisition brought our ownership of the DST to 93.577%, including 19.753% in Interests that were acquired previously in unrelated transactions. We closed on the purchase of the remaining 6.423% in Interests on February 15, 2011, with the majority of the consideration being provided in the form of approximately 70,000 limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership. We paid our Advisor approximately $377,000 in acquisition fees in connection with these acquisitions.
The DST, through the Subtrusts, owns ten self storage facilities located in Georgia, North Carolina and Texas with an aggregate of approximately 5,440 units and 726,000 rentable square feet.
The three Subtrusts lease their respective properties to master tenants (the “Tenants”) on a triple-net basis pursuant to master leases (the “Leases”) that have terms of ten years and expire on November 1, 2015. The Tenants are owned by affiliates of the Sponsor. Under the Leases, the Tenants pay a stated monthly rent equivalent to the monthly debt service payment under the Bank of America Loans, which is paid directly to the lender on behalf of the Subtrusts, a monthly stated rent equivalent to an investor return of 7.0% per annum, and may pay certain annual bonus rent per the terms of the Leases, both of which stated rent and bonus rent are remitted to the Subtrusts. As an Interest holder, we are entitled to our pro rata share of the total rent less the debt service under the Bank of America Loans. The Tenants are entitled to retain any cash flow in excess of these rent payments. Upon acquiring 100% of the Interests, we initiated the process to seek lender approval to terminate the Leases. In any event, we and our Sponsor have agreed to assign 100% of the economic benefits and obligations from these properties to us in exchange for indemnification by us for any potential liability incurred subsequent to the assignment by the Sponsor in connection with the Leases.
F-30
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
The properties owned by the Subtrusts are subject to the three Bank of America Loans, which had an aggregate principal balance of approximately $23.8 million as of February 1, 2011. The Bank of America Loans bear a fixed interest rate of 5.18%, had original terms of ten years and mature on November 1, 2015. The Bank of America Loans required monthly interest-only payments during the first three years of their terms and now require monthly principal-and-interest payments based on a 30-year amortization period. Each of the Bank of America Loans is secured only by the DST properties owned by the respective Subtrust that obtained such loan.
Mississauga
On March 11, 2011, we acquired a self storage facility located in Mississauga, Ontario - Canada, from an unaffiliated third party for a total purchase price of approximately $5.6 million, plus closing costs and acquisition fees. We paid cash for the entire purchase price and paid our Advisor an acquisition fee of approximately $140,000 in connection with this acquisition. The Mississauga property is a conversion project that, when completed, will be an approximately 800-unit self storage facility that sits on approximately 4.8 acres and will contain approximately 101,000 rentable square feet of self storage space. Construction is expected to be completed in the third or fourth quarter of 2011.
El Paso I
On March 17, 2011, we acquired a self storage facility located in El Paso, Texas from an unaffiliated third party for a total purchase price of approximately $1.25 million, plus closing costs and acquisition fees. We paid cash for the entire purchase price and paid our Advisor an acquisition fee of $31,250 in connection with this acquisition. The acquisition of the El Paso I property is subject to an “earn out” provision that could increase the acquisition price up to an additional $450,000. The El Paso I property was built in 2010, and as a result of recent renovations, has approximately 40,800 rentable square feet, consisting of approximately 290 units of self storage space, including 25 RV spaces.
Las Vegas VII and Las Vegas VIII
On March 25, 2011, we, through a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, closed on the acquisition of 99.34% in ownership interests (the “LLC Interests”) in AMS IV Las Vegas Investments, LLC, which owns a self storage facility located in Las Vegas, Nevada (“Las Vegas VII”) and a self storage facility located in Henderson, Nevada (“Las Vegas VIII”). In exchange for the LLC Interests, we caused our Operating Partnership to issue approximately 114,000 Class D limited partnership units (“Class D Units”), paid approximately $30,000 in cash and paid off the existing debt encumbering the properties of approximately $9.73 million, plus closing costs and acquisition fees. The sellers of the LLC Interests were unaffiliated third parties. We paid our Advisor an acquisition fee of $275,000 in connection with this acquisition.
On the date of the acquisition, we adopted Amendment No. 1 to our Operating Partnership’s First Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, which established the Class D Units. The Class D Units have all of the rights, powers, duties and preferences of the Operating Partnership’s other limited partnership units, except that the Class D Units are subject to an annual distribution limit that sets the amount of annual cash distributions paid with respect to the Class D Units initially at zero percent (0%).
The Las Vegas VII property was built in 1996 and has approximately 58,400 rentable square feet, consisting of approximately 720 units of self storage space, including 150 RV spaces. The Las Vegas VII property is located on approximately 5.2 acres.
The Las Vegas VIII property was built in 1997 and has approximately 60,600 rentable square feet, consisting of approximately 510 units of self storage space, including approximately 50 RV spaces. The Las Vegas VIII property is located on approximately 3.9 acres.
F-31
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
SF Bay Area – Morgan Hill and SF Bay Area Vallejo
On September 14, 2010, we entered into four purchase and sale agreements for four properties located in the San Francisco Bay area (the “SF Bay Area Portfolio”), including the SF Bay Area - Morgan Hill property and the SF Bay Area - Vallejo property. On March 30, 2011, we acquired two self storage facilities located in Morgan Hill, California and Vallejo, California from two unaffiliated third parties for a total purchase price of $14.09 million, plus closing costs and acquisition fees. We assumed two loans for approximately $7.6 million and paid cash for the remainder, and paid our Advisor an acquisition fee of $352,250 in connection with these acquisitions. One of the assumed loans has a remaining principal balance of approximately $4.55 million, bears a fixed rate of interest of 6.04% and matures in 2014. The other assumed loan has a remaining principal balance of approximately $3.05 million, bears a fixed rate of interest of 5.75% and matures in 2013. We expect to close on the acquisition of the other two properties in the SF Bay Area Portfolio before the end of the second quarter of 2011.
The SF Bay Area - Morgan Hill property is an approximately 490-unit self storage facility that sits on approximately 3.0 acres and contains approximately 61,000 rentable square feet of self storage space. It was constructed in 1997.
The SF Bay Area - Vallejo property is an approximately 860-unit self storage facility that sits on approximately 4.1 acres and contains approximately 75,000 rentable square feet of self storage space. It was constructed in 2001.
With the addition of these acquisitions subsequent to December 31, 2010, as of March 31, 2011, our portfolio now includes 61 properties in 16 states and Canada.
Potential Acquisitions
In addition to the acquisitions of self storage facilities that we completed during the year ended December 31, 2010 and subsequent to such date through March 25, 2011, we entered into purchase and sale agreements for the acquisitions of 16 additional self storage facilities in seven states, which have not closed as of March 31, 2011. We expect to close each of these acquisitions before the end of the second or third quarter of 2011.
The table below is a summary of our 16 potential acquisitions:
| Property |
Date of Purchase and Sale Agreement |
Acquisition Price |
Year Built/ Converted |
Approx. Units |
Approx. Rentable Sq. Ft. (net) |
|||||||||||||
| SF Bay Area – San Lorenzo – CA |
9/14/10 | $ | 2,850,000 | 2000 | 640 | 62,000 | ||||||||||||
| SF Bay Area – Gilroy – CA |
9/14/10 | $ | 6,560,000 | 1999 | 610 | 63,500 | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas V – NV |
10/15/10 | $ | 4,600,000 | 1997 | 790 | 69,000 | ||||||||||||
| Ladera Ranch – CA |
12/22/10 | $ | 20,900,000 | 2002 | 980 | 102,000 | ||||||||||||
| Neptune – NJ |
2/28/11 | $ | 3,760,000 | 1990/2000 | 530 | 54,500 | ||||||||||||
| Peachtree City – GA |
3/25/11 | $ | 5,290,000 | 1989-2004 | 670 | 123,400 | ||||||||||||
| Buford – GA |
3/25/11 | $ | 2,500,000 | 2004 | 520 | 68,900 | ||||||||||||
| Jonesboro – GA |
3/25/11 | $ | 2,440,000 | 1998-2002 | 730 | 106,400 | ||||||||||||
| Ellenwood – GA |
3/25/11 | $ | 2,260,000 | 1998 | 300 | 40,700 | ||||||||||||
| Marietta II – GA |
3/25/11 | $ | 2,620,000 | 1998/2005/2007 | 480 | 61,200 | ||||||||||||
| Collegeville – PA |
3/25/11 | $ | 3,030,000 | 1996-2007 | 540 | 58,400 | ||||||||||||
| Skippack – PA |
3/25/11 | $ | 2,340,000 | 2003 | 390 | 56,300 | ||||||||||||
| Ballston Spa – NY |
3/25/11 | $ | 5,030,000 | 2002-2007 | 690 | 82,800 | ||||||||||||
| Trenton – NJ |
3/25/11 | $ | 7,620,000 | 2004 | 660 | 85,100 | ||||||||||||
| Fredericksburg – VA |
3/25/11 | $ | 4,180,000 | 2002 | 630 | 59,600 | ||||||||||||
| Sandston – VA |
3/25/11 | $ | 6,720,000 | 2005/2006 | 680 | 78,100 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 82,700,000 | 9,840 | 1,171,900 | ||||||||||||||
There can be no assurance that we will complete any of the acquisitions in the table above. In some circumstances, if we fail to complete an acquisition, we may forfeit earnest money as a result.
F-32
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
Financing
On January 12, 2011, we encumbered the Toronto property with a loan from Roynat Inc. for a total principal amount of CAD $7.0 million (approximately US $7.1 million based on the exchange rate as of the loan date), which matures on January 12, 2014. Such loan bears a variable interest rate that commences at Roynat Inc.’s floating base rate plus 3.50% per annum.
On January 28, 2011, we repaid the loan outstanding on the Long Beach property in the amount of $5,000,000.
On January 28, 2011, we encumbered eleven of our self storage facilities (the “Encumbered Properties”) in connection with a loan obtained from The Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (the “Citi Loan”) in the principal amount of approximately $29.1 million. The proceeds from the Citi Loan were used to repay the existing debt obligations of approximately $5 million related to two of our existing Encumbered Properties, to make future acquisitions of self storage facilities and for other general corporate purposes. The Citi Loan has a term of ten years and matures on February 6, 2021. The Citi Loan bears a fixed rate of 5.77% per annum on a 30-year amortization schedule. Payments of principal and interest are due on a monthly basis. We may prepay the Citi Loan without penalty in the last three months of the ten-year term. We have guaranteed the obligations under the Citi loan in limited circumstances set forth in the loan documents. The Citi loan contains a number of other customary terms and covenants. The net book value of the Encumbered Properties as of December 31, 2010 was approximately $52 million. Such amounts are only available to satisfy the obligations of the Citi Loan.
On March 21, 2011 we entered into a loan with The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) in the principal amount of $6,800,000 (the “Prudential – Long Beach Loan). Such loan has a term of approximately 8.5 years and matures on September 5, 2019. This loan has a fixed rate of interest of 5.27% per annum on a 30 year amortization schedule with principal and interest payments due monthly. The Prudential – Long Beach Loan is secured by a deed of trust and first priority security interest in the Long Beach property and is cross-collateralized by eleven other loans entered into with Prudential on August 25, 2010. We have guaranteed the Prudential – Long Beach Loan under certain circumstances.
Offering Status
As of March 25, 2011, in connection with our Offering we have issued approximately 23.3 million shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $231.6 million.
Declaration of Dividends
On March 25, 2011, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the second quarter of 2011 of $0.00191781 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock (equivalent to an annual distribution rate of 7% assuming the share was purchased for $10) payable to stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on April 1, 2011 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including June 30, 2011.
F-33
Table of Contents
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2010
| Initial Cost to Company | Cost Capitalized subsequent to Acquisition |
Gross Carrying Amount at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
ST | Encumbrance | Land | Building and Improvements |
Total | Building and Improvements |
Land | Building and Improvements |
Total | Accumulated Depreciation |
Date of Construction |
Date Acquired |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Biloxi |
MS | $ | 987,911 | $ | 518,701 | $ | 2,847,676 | $ | 3,366,377 | $ | 22,800 | $ | 518,701 | $ | 2,870,476 | $ | 3,389,177 | ($ | 291,222 | ) | 1980/1984/1992 | 09/25/08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gulf Breeze |
FL | 3,951,644 | 1,943,144 | 5,043,905 | 6,987,049 | 22,172 | 1,943,144 | 5,066,077 | 7,009,221 | (440,694 | ) | 1978/1982/2004 | 09/25/08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manassas |
VA | 1,544,820 | 1,050,519 | 3,741,305 | 4,791,824 | 31,066 | 1,050,519 | 3,772,371 | 4,822,890 | (267,677 | ) | 1996/2000 | 12/19/08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Walton |
KY | 1,787,617 | 650,000 | 2,634,959 | 3,284,959 | 47,227 | 650,000 | 2,682,186 | 3,332,186 | (199,961 | ) | 1991 | 2/12/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Crescent Springs |
KY | 800,000 | 280,000 | 1,637,801 | 1,917,801 | 64,920 | 280,000 | 1,702,721 | 1,982,721 | (110,890 | ) | 1999/2003 | 2/12/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florence |
KY | 1,912,383 | 840,000 | 2,691,629 | 3,531,629 | 49,315 | 840,000 | 2,740,944 | 3,580,944 | (202,904 | ) | 1996 | 2/12/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alpharetta |
GA | — | 1,060,107 | 3,752,629 | 4,812,736 | 40,185 | 1,060,107 | 3,792,814 | 4,852,921 | (204,138 | ) | 2003 | 6/1/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marietta |
GA | 2,242,480 | 1,060,000 | 2,705,806 | 3,765,806 | 53,445 | 1,060,000 | 2,759,251 | 3,819,251 | (138,171 | ) | 2006 | 6/1/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Erlanger |
KY | 1,594,652 | 565,790 | 2,463,269 | 3,029,059 | 109,680 | 565,790 | 2,572,949 | 3,138,739 | (148,763 | ) | 1987 | 7/17/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florence II |
KY | — | 871,200 | 4,877,025 | 5,748,225 | 126,129 | 871,200 | 5,003,154 | 5,874,354 | (263,316 | ) | 1982/1995 | 7/17/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey City |
NJ | — | 3,625,048 | 6,999,952 | 10,625,000 | 404,235 | 3,625,048 | 7,404,187 | 11,029,235 | (303,798 | ) | 1985 | 8/21/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montgomery |
AL | 2,905,005 | 1,197,900 | 2,389,873 | 3,587,773 | 30,009 | 1,197,900 | 2,419,882 | 3,617,782 | (121,258 | ) | 1995/2004 | 9/3/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix |
AZ | — | 680,620 | 1,259,380 | 1,940,000 | 308,738 | 680,620 | 1,568,118 | 2,248,738 | (65,808 | ) | 1974 | 9/4/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seabrook |
TX | 4,648,475 | 1,520,000 | 3,860,000 | 5,380,000 | — | 1,520,000 | 3,860,000 | 5,380,000 | (190,779 | ) | 2001-2003 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greenville |
SC | 2,329,399 | 530,000 | 2,570,000 | 3,100,000 | 73,100 | 530,000 | 2,643,100 | 3,173,100 | (102,618 | ) | 1948/1995 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kemah |
TX | 9,086,648 | 2,510,000 | 8,970,000 | 11,480,000 | 1,787 | 2,510,000 | 8,971,787 | 11,481,787 | (457,037 | ) |
|
1985/2005/ 1999/2002 |
|
9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tallahassee |
FL | 7,650,000 | 1,230,000 | 6,310,000 | 7,540,000 | 2,979 | 1,230,000 | 6,312,979 | 7,542,979 | (267,927 | ) | 1979-1987 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Memphis |
TN | 2,572,089 | 790,000 | 2,560,000 | 3,350,000 | 1,894 | 790,000 | 2,561,894 | 3,351,894 | (159,201 | ) | 1987/1994 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Houston |
TX | 2,087,590 | 420,000 | 1,650,000 | 2,070,000 | 23,704 | 420,000 | 1,673,704 | 2,093,704 | (105,973 | ) | 1984/2005 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas |
NV | 1,519,903 | 1,460,000 | 4,220,000 | 5,680,000 | — | 1,460,000 | 4,220,000 | 5,680,000 | (174,821 | ) | 2006 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas II |
NV | 1,540,000 | 1,050,000 | 970,000 | 2,020,000 | — | 1,050,000 | 970,000 | 2,020,000 | (46,969 | ) | 1998 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pearland |
TX | 3,500,000 | 1,060,000 | 4,540,000 | 5,600,000 | 3,773 | 1,060,000 | 4,543,773 | 5,603,773 | (232,828 | ) | 2004/2005 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daphne |
AL | 1,844,445 | 1,530,000 | 2,510,000 | 4,040,000 | 17,068 | 1,530,000 | 2,527,068 | 4,057,068 | (100,105 | ) | 2000 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lake Forest |
CA | 18,000,000 | 15,840,000 | 8,860,000 | 24,700,000 | 44,938 | 15,840,000 | 8,904,938 | 24,744,938 | (572,204 | ) | 2003 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| San Francisco |
CA | 10,500,000 | 9,280,000 | 8,200,000 | 17,480,000 | 10,940 | 9,284,075 | 8,206,865 | 17,490,940 | (304,551 | ) | 1909/2000 | 9/24/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pittsburgh |
PA | 1,345,488 | 680,189 | 1,379,025 | 2,059,214 | 25,889 | 680,189 | 1,404,914 | 2,085,103 | (61,887 | ) | 1990 | 12/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West Mifflin |
PA | — | 868,872 | 2,114,578 | 2,983,450 | 44,429 | 868,872 | 2,159,007 | 3,027,879 | (81,965 | ) | 1983 | 12/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fort Lee |
NJ | 8,670,923 | 2,000,000 | 13,630,000 | 15,630,000 | 109,104 | 2,000,000 | 13,739,104 | 15,739,104 | (352,918 | ) | 2000 | 02/24/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weston |
FL | 3,288,971 | 1,500,000 | 4,330,000 | 5,830,000 | — | 1,500,000 | 4,330,000 | 5,830,000 | (111,085 | ) | 2005 | 02/24/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gulf Breeze II |
FL | — | 270,000 | 895,000 | 1,165,000 | 6,989 | 270,000 | 901,989 | 1,171,989 | (34,069 | ) | 2004/2005 | 03/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mesa |
AZ | 3,161,123 | 600,000 | 2,633,728 | 3,233,728 | 1,650 | 600,000 | 2,635,378 | 3,235,378 | (70,615 | ) | 2002 | 4/9/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oakland Park |
FL | 7,699,181 | 4,530,650 | 8,729,350 | 13,260,000 | 59,955 | 4,530,650 | 8,789,305 | 13,319,955 | (188,300 | ) | 1987 | 4/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix II |
AZ | 847,159 | 1,020,000 | 515,000 | 1,535,000 | 195,381 | 1,020,000 | 710,381 | 1,730,381 | (23,621 | ) | 1974 | 5/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-1
Table of Contents
| Initial Cost to Company | Cost Capitalized subsequent to Acquisition |
Gross Carrying Amount at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
ST | Encumbrance | Land | Building and Improvements |
Total | Building and Improvements |
Land | Building and Improvements |
Total | Accumulated Depreciation |
Date of Construction |
Date Acquired |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tempe |
AZ | 996,658 | 900,000 | 740,000 | 1,640,000 | 89,455 | 900,000 | 829,455 | 1,729,455 | (24,907 | ) | 1973 | 5/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Riverdale |
NJ | 4,800,000 | 1,050,000 | 4,794,357 | 5,844,357 | 20,283 | 1,050,000 | 4,814,640 | 5,864,640 | (90,312 | ) | 2007 | 5/14/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Davie |
FL | 2,725,652 | 2,840,000 | 2,040,000 | 4,880,000 | — | 2,840,000 | 2,040,000 | 4,880,000 | (36,565 | ) | 1988 | 7/14/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 95th St. |
IL | — | 1,600,000 | 4,230,000 | 5,830,000 | 13,131 | 1,600,000 | 4,243,131 | 5,843,131 | (30,468 | ) | 2002 | 10/22/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Western |
IL | — | 900,000 | 400,000 | 1,300,000 | 7,353 | 900,000 | 407,353 | 1,307,353 | (3,620 | ) | 2004 | 10/22/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ogden |
IL | — | 1,703,370 | 1,766,630 | 3,470,000 | 44,845 | 1,703,370 | 1,811,475 | 3,514,845 | (15,404 | ) | 2002 | 10/26/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas III |
NV | — | 1,130,000 | 2,985,000 | 4,115,000 | — | 1,130,000 | 2,985,000 | 4,115,000 | (15,543 | ) | 2005 | 10/29/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Roosevelt |
IL | — | 1,207,135 | 502,865 | 1,710,000 | 2,854 | 1,207,135 | 505,719 | 1,712,854 | (2,883 | ) | 2004 | 11/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dufferin |
(1 | ) | — | 4,576,772 | 9,120,472 | 13,697,244 | 220,547 | (2) | 4,650,465 | 9,267,326 | 13,917,791 | (29,726 | ) | 1965/2008 | 11/23/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| La Cienega |
CA | — | 3,260,000 | 8,990,000 | 12,250,000 | — | 3,260,000 | 8,990,000 | 12,250,000 | (11,948 | ) | 2004 | 12/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long Beach |
CA | 5,000,000 | 4,810,000 | 7,040,000 | 11,850,000 | — | 4,810,000 | 7,040,000 | 11,850,000 | (11,849 | ) | 1999 | 12/16/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Las Vegas IV |
NV | — | 1,470,000 | 4,835,000 | 6,305,000 | — | 1,470,000 | 4,835,000 | 6,305,000 | (4,950 | ) | 1996 | 12/21/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rancho |
NV | — | 990,000 | 2,830,000 | 3,820,000 | — | 990,000 | 2,830,000 | 3,820,000 | (766 | ) | 2006 | 12/29/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 121,540,216 | $ | 89,470,017 | $ | 182,766,214 | $ | 272,236,231 | $ | 2,331,969 | $ | 89,547,785 | $ | 185,020,415 | $ | 274,568,200 | $ | (6,677,014 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | This property is located in Ontario, Canada. |
| (2) | The increase in cost at this self storage facility is due to the impact of foreign exchange rate changes. |
Activity in real estate facilities during 2010 was as follows:
| 2010 | ||||
| Real estate facilities |
||||
| Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 155,058,360 | ||
| Acquisitions |
117,365,329 | |||
| Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
220,547 | |||
| Improvements |
1,923,964 | |||
| Balance at end of year |
$ | 274,568,200 | ||
| Accumulated depreciation |
||||
| Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 1,733,158 | ||
| Depreciation expense |
4,943,856 | |||
| Balance at end of year |
$ | 6,677,014 | ||
| Real estate facilities, net |
$ | 267,891,186 | ||
S-2
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on April 29, 2008, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 3.2 | Bylaws of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on March 7, 2008, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 4.1 | Form of Subscription Agreement and Subscription Agreement Signature Page, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on March 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.1 | First Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Strategic Storage Operating Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on April 29, 2008, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.2 | Advisory Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on April 29, 2008, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.3 | Amendment to Advisory Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on March 30, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.4 | Employee and Director Long-Term Incentive Plan of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on March 7, 2008, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.5 | Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. Distribution Reinvestment Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on October 14, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.6 | Promissory Note in favor of Garrard Street Enterprises, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 13, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.7 | Promissory Note in favor of Crescent Springs Storage, L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 13, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.8 | Cross Collateralization and Cross Default Agreement for Benefit of Garrard Street Enterprises, LLC and Crescent Springs Storage, L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 13, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 10.9 | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., SS REIT I Acquisition, Inc. and Self Storage REIT, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on July 7, 2009, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.10 | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., SS REIT II Acquisition, Inc. and Self Storage REIT II, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on July 7, 2009, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.11 | Promissory Note in favor of LaSalle Bank National Association dated September 5, 2007 related to the Lake Forest Property, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on March 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.12 | Guaranty for the benefit of LaSalle Bank National Association dated September 5, 2007 related to the Lake Forest Property, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on March 30, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
Table of Contents
| Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 10.13 | Collateral Loan Agreement by and among The Prudential Life Insurance Company of America and Eleven Special-Purpose Entities dated August 25, 2010 (“Prudential Loan”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.14 | Form of Promissory Note for Prudential Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.15 | Form of Mortgage or Deed of Trust and Security Agreement for Prudential Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.16 | Form of Assignment of Leases and Rents for Prudential Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.17 | Form of Supplemental Guaranty for Prudential Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.18 | Form of Recourse Liabilities Guaranty for Prudential Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2010, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.19 | Promissory Note in favor of The Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. dated January 28, 2011 (“Citi Loan”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2011, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.20 | Loan Agreement for Citi Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2011, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.21 | Limited Recourse Guaranty for Citi Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2011, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.22 | Loan Agreement between EP Rhino, DST and Bank of America, N.A. dated November 1, 2005 (“Bank of American Loan”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 7, 2011, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 10.23 | Promissory Note for Bank of America Loan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 7, 2011, Commission File No. 000-53644 | |
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on October 14, 2009, Commission File No. 333-146959 | |
| 31.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 31.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| * | Filed herewith. |