SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

Commission File Number 0-50264 and
2-84126

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		94-6260018
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 413-2600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Units of Beneficial Interest
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o    No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o    No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ    No o

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part II of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes o No þ

The Registrant has no voting stock. As of December 31, 2010 there were 27,273.338 Series A Units, 99,363.213 Series B Units and 4,160.119 for Series W Units of Beneficial Interest issued and outstanding.

Total number of pages 69. Consecutive page numbers on which exhibits commence: 5.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

				Page
PART I
ITEM 1.		BUSINESS			1-6
ITEM 1A.		RISK FACTORS			6-16
ITEM 1B.		UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS			16
ITEM 2.		PROPERTIES			16
ITEM 3.		LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			16
ITEM 4.		(REMOVED AND RESERVED)			16
PART II
ITEM 5.		MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES			17
ITEM 6.		SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA			17-18
ITEM 7.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			19-29
ITEM 7A.		QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			29-35
ITEM 8.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA			35
ITEM 9.		CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE			35
ITEM 9A.		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			36
ITEM 9B.		OTHER INFORMATION			36
PART III
ITEM 10.		DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			37-40
ITEM 11.		EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			40
ITEM 12.		SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS			40
ITEM 13.		CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE			41

				Page
ITEM 14.		PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES			41
PART IV
ITEM 15.		EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES			41 – 42
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS
EX-31.01
EX-31.02
EX-32.01
EX-32.02

PART I

Item 1.		Business

General development of business

          The Campbell Fund Trust (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized on January 2, 1996 under the Delaware Business Trust Act, which was replaced by the Delaware Statutory Trust Act as of September 1, 2002. The Trust is a successor to the Campbell Fund Limited Partnership (formerly known as the Commodity Trend Fund) and began trading operations in January 1972. The Trust currently trades in the U.S. and international futures and forward markets under the sole direction of Campbell & Company, Inc. (“Campbell & Company” or the “managing operator”). Specifically, the Trust trades a portfolio primarily focused on financial futures and forwards, with a secondary emphasis on metals, energy and agricultural products. The Trust is an actively managed account with speculative trading profits as its objective.

          As a registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Fund is subject to the regulatory requirements under the Securities Act of 1934. As a commodity investment pool, the Fund is subject to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, an agency of the United States (U.S.) government which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry; rules of the National Futures Association, an industry self-regulatory organization; and the requirements of the various commodity exchanges where the Fund executes transactions. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the requirements of futures commission merchants (brokers) and interbank market makers through which the Fund trades.

          U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking corporation, (the “Trustee”), is the sole trustee of the Trust. The Trustee is unaffiliated with the managing operator and the Trust’s selling agents, and its duties and liabilities with respect to the offering of the Units of Beneficial Interest (the “Units”) are limited to its express obligations under the Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement.

          Under the Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement, the Trustee has delegated the exclusive management of all aspects of the business and administration of the Trust to Campbell & Company, a Maryland corporation organized in April 1978 as a successor to a partnership originally organized in January 1974. Campbell & Company is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a commodity pool operator and a commodity trading advisor, and is a member of the National Futures Association in such capacities. In addition to managing all aspects of business and administration, Campbell & Company makes all trading decisions for the Trust. Campbell & Company uses a systematic trading approach combined with quantitative portfolio management analysis and seeks to identify and profit from price movements in the futures, forward and option markets. Multiple trading models are utilized across most markets traded. Each model analyzes market movements and internal market and price configurations in order to generate signals to be executed through a variety of execution platforms.

          The Trust’s funds are traded pursuant to Campbell & Company’s Global Diversified Large Portfolio. Prior to June 1997, Campbell & Company had one Global Diversified Portfolio. In June 1997, the Global Diversified Portfolio was split into two separate portfolios, the Global Diversified Large Portfolio (which generally is used for accounts greater than $10 million) and the Global Diversified Small Portfolio (which is generally used for accounts less than $10 million). From inception through June 1997, the Trust’s account was traded pursuant to Campbell & Company’s Global Diversified Portfolio. Between June 1997 and August 1999, the Trust’s account was traded pursuant to the Global Diversified Small Portfolio, and since August 1, 1999, has been traded pursuant to the Global Diversified Large Portfolio.

          Effective August 31, 2008, the Trust began offering Series A, Series B, and Series W units. The units in the Trust prior to that date became Series B units. Series B units are only available for additional investment by existing holders of Series B units.

          As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate capitalization of the Trust was $346,449,628 with Series A, Series B and Series W comprising $71,343,164, $263,959,495 and $11,146,969, respectively, of the total. The Net Asset Value per Unit was $2,615.86 for Series A, $2,656.51 for Series B, and $2,679.48 for Series W.

Financial information about segments

          The Trust’s business constitutes only one segment for financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative “commodity pool.” The Trust does not engage in sales of goods or services.

Narrative description of business

General

          The purpose of the Trust is to engage in the speculative trading, buying, selling, or otherwise acquiring, holding or disposing of commodities, including futures contracts, option contracts, forward contracts and any other rights pertaining thereto, and for such other purposes as may be incidental or related thereto.

          The Trust trades speculatively in the U.S. and international futures, forward, and option markets. Specifically, the Trust trades in a portfolio that is primarily focused on financial futures, forwards, and options, with a secondary emphasis on metal, energy and agricultural products. The Trust has entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company whereby it trades the Trust’s assets pursuant to Campbell & Company’s Global Diversified Large Portfolio. The portfolio trades commodity interests which include energy products, agricultural products, precious and base metals, stock market indices, interest rates and foreign currencies. The Global Diversified Large Portfolio seeks exposure to these markets by following signals generated by a series of systematic computer models. The Global Diversified Large Portfolio employs a broad spectrum of models including traditional and factor-based trend following models, as well as a number of macroeconomic-based models. As of December 2010, the percentage of component risk for each major sector was as follows: 42% to commodities, 21% to currencies, 21% to stock indices, and 16% to interest rates.

Use of Proceeds and Cash Management Income

Subscription Proceeds and Available Assets.

          The entire offering proceeds, without deductions, will be credited to the Trust‘s bank and brokerage accounts to engage in trading activities and as reserves for that trading. The Trust meets its margin requirements by depositing U.S. government securities with the futures broker and the over-the-counter counterparty. In this way, substantially all (i.e., 95% or more) of the Trust‘s assets, whether used as margin for trading purposes or as reserves for such trading, may be invested in U.S. government securities and time deposits with U.S. banks. Investors should note that maintenance of the Trust‘s assets in U.S. government securities and banks does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures, forward and option contracts. The Trust receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Trust assets.

          Approximately 10% to 30% of the Trust‘s assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures broker, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury bills in segregated accounts with the futures broker pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. Approximately 10% to 30% of the Trust‘s assets are deposited with the over-the-counter counterparty in order to initiate and maintain currency forward and option contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in cash, U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S. regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparty. The remaining 40% to 80% of the Trust‘s assets will be invested in cash, cash equivalents or other liquid positions in its cash management program over and above that needed to post as collateral for trading.

          The Trust‘s assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested with or loaned to Campbell & Company or any affiliated entities.

          In the event net asset value per unit as of the end of any business day declines by 50% or more from either the prior year-end or the prior month-end unit value, Campbell & Company will suspend trading activities, notify all unitholders of the relevant facts within seven business days and declare a special redemption period.

Cash Manager and Custodian.

          During 2009, The Trust appointed Wilmington Trust Investment Management LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Wilmington Trust Corporation as cash manager (the “Cash Manager”) under the Non-Custody Investment Advisory Agreement dated July 8, 2009. During 2010, The Trust appointed Horizon Cash Management LLC as cash manager (the “Cash Manager”) under the Investment Advisory Agreement dated December 22, 2010 to manage and control the liquid assets of the Trust. Both Cash Managers are registered as investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Cash Managers specialize in investments which are predominately short-term in maturity and high grade, high quality in nature with particular emphasis on U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government Agencies’ issues. The Trust has terminated the Non-Custody Investment Advisory Agreement appointing Wilmington Trust Investment Management LLC as cash manager, effective December 31, 2010.

     The Trust opened a custodial account at The Northern Trust Company (the “Custodian”), and has granted the Cash Manager a limited power of attorney over such accounts. Such power of attorney gives the Cash Manager authority to make certain investments on behalf of the Trust provided such investments are consistent with the investment guidelines created by the managing operator to the Trust. Such investments include, but are not limited to, U.S. Treasury securities, securities issued by U.S. Government Agencies, high quality money-market securities and repurchase agreements. All securities purchased by the Cash Manager on behalf of the Trust or other liquid funds of the Trust will be held in its custody account at the custodian. The Cash Manager will have no beneficial or other interest in the securities and cash in such custody account.

Market Sectors.

          Campbell & Company’s Global Diversified Large Portfolio trades in a fully diversified portfolio of futures, forward and option markets, including energy products (Brent crude, gas oil, heating oil, natural gas, unleaded gasoline and WTI Crude), agricultural products (coffee, corn, cotton and wheat), precious and base metals (aluminum, copper, gold, and zinc), stock market indices (DAX, DJ Euro Stoxx 50, FTSE, Hang Seng, IBEX, MSCI, NASDAQ, Nikkei and S&P 500), interest rates (short-term and long-term) and foreign currencies (majors, minors and cross rates).

Market Types.

          The Trust trades on a variety of United States and foreign futures exchanges. Approximately 50% of the Trust’s trading takes place in the off-exchange highly liquid, institutionally-based currency forward and options markets. The remaining 50% takes place on futures exchanges.

          As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Trust’s commitments to different types of markets — U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and non regulated — differ substantially from time to time, as well as over time, and may change at any time if Campbell & Company determines such change to be in the best interests of the Trust. No one market exceeds 10% of the total portfolio allocation.

Charges

          The following is a description of current charges to the Trust.

RECIPIENT		NATURE OF PAYMENT		AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
Campbell & Company		Management Fee		A monthly management fee of 1/12 of 4% of the month-end net assets of the Series A units and Series B units, totaling approximately 4% of the average month-end net assets per year of the Series A units and Series B units; a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 2% of the month-end net assets of the Series W units, totaling approximately 2% of average month-end net assets per year of the Series W units. The managing operator may pay a portion or all of its monthly management fee either upfront (with respect to Series A units) or on an ongoing basis with respect to Series B units (commencing with the 13th month with respect to Series A units) to selected selling agents who have sold the Series A units and the Series B units, in return for their provision of ongoing services to the Series A and/or the Series B unitholders. It is intended that, in most cases, the ongoing payment paid to selling agents will be 2% per annum, paid monthly, on the then current net asset value of units sold by the selling agents, net of redemptions.
Campbell & Company		Performance Fee		A quarterly performance fee of 20% of the aggregate cumulative appreciation (if any) in the net asset value per unit of the Series A units, Series B units and Series W units at the end of each quarter, exclusive of appreciation attributable to interest income.
Campbell & Company		Organization and Offering Expenses		The Series A units and Series W units each bear offering expenses incurred in relation to the offering of the Series A units and Series W units, respectively, up to an amount equal to approximately 1/12 of 0.50% of the month-end net assets of each of the Series A units and Series W units, totaling a maximum of 0.50% of average month-end net assets per year each of the Series A units and Series W units. Such organization and offering expenses of the Trust include all fees and expenses in connection with the distribution of the units, including legal, accounting, printing, mailing, filing fees, escrow fees, salaries and bonuses of employees while engaged in sales activities, and marketing expenses of Campbell & Company and the selling agents which are paid by the Trust.
Selling Agents		Administrative Fee		The selling agents (the firm and not the individual representatives) who sell Series W units receive a monthly administrative fee of 1/12 of 0.50% of the month-end net assets of the Series W units, totaling approximately 0.50% of average month-end net assets per year of the Series W units.

RECIPIENT		NATURE OF PAYMENT		AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
UBS SECURITIES, LLC		Brokerage Commissions		Brokerage commissions are paid at a rate of approximately $3 for each round-turn trade executed for the Trust, or approximately 0.20% of average month-end net assets per year of each Series of Units, although there is no limit on the amount of such commissions.
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS)		Over-the-Counter Counterparty Execution Costs		The over-the-counter counterparty’s execution costs are included in the price of each forward or option contract purchased or sold, and, accordingly, such costs cannot be determined but are charged. In addition, RBS charges approximately $4 per $1 million, plus any additional electronic platform charges, for forward or option contracts it facilitates on behalf of the Trust with third party banks. These prime brokerage fees, combined with the futures broker’s charges, usually equal approximately 0.25% of the Trust’s net assets.
Wilmington Trust Investment Management, LLC & Horizon Cash Management, LLC (the “Cash Managers”)		Cash Managers and the Custodian		The Trust pays the Cash Managers and Northern Trust Company a combined annualized fee equal to approximately 0.10% per annum of the funds managed by the Cash Managers based on a percentage of the principal amount of the Trust’s non-margin assets under management by the Cash Managers, computed and accrued on the average daily market value maintained in the Northern Trust Company custodial account by the Trust. The Cash Managers and Northern Trust Company are not affiliated with Campbell & Company. The Trust may engage other firms which are unaffiliated with Campbell & Company from time to time to provide cash management and custodial services. Such services would be provided pursuant to similar terms and fees as those that apply to the Cash Managers and Northern Trust Company. The Trust may also terminate all types of cash management services at any time.
Other		Operating Expenses		The Trust pays operating expenses (other than the cost of the Units), including, but not limited to, administrative, legal and accounting fees and any taxes or extraordinary expenses payable by the Trust. These expenses are estimated at approximately 0.10% of the Trust’s net assets annually, although there is no limit on the amount of such expenses.

Regulation

          The U.S. futures markets are regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, which is administered by the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions (the “CFTC”), a federal agency created in 1974. The CFTC licenses and regulates commodity exchanges, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors and clearing firms which are referred to in the futures industry as “futures commission merchants.” Campbell & Company is licensed by the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor. Futures professionals are also regulated by the National Futures Association (the “NFA”), a self-regulatory organization for the futures industry that supervises the dealings between futures professionals and their customers. If its pertinent CFTC licenses or NFA memberships were to lapse, be suspended, or be revoked, Campbell & Company would be unable to act as the Trust’s commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor.

          The CFTC has adopted disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for commodity pool operators and disclosure and recordkeeping requirements for commodity trading advisors. The reporting rules require pool operators to furnish to the participants in their pools a monthly statement of account, showing the pool’s income or loss and change in net asset value, and an annual financial report, audited by an independent certified public accountant.

          The CFTC and the exchanges have pervasive powers over the futures markets, including the emergency power to suspend trading and order trading for liquidation of existing positions only. The exercise of such powers could adversely affect the Trust’s trading.

          The CFTC does not regulate forward contracts. Federal and state banking authorities also do not regulate forward trading or forward dealers. Trading in foreign currency forward contracts may be less liquid and the Trust’s trading results may be adversely affected.

          The Trust has no employees. The Trust trades on a number of foreign commodity exchanges. The Trust does not engage in the sales of goods or services.

Other Information

          The Trust files quarterly, annual and current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports are available to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Facilities in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC’s toll free number, 1-800-SEC-0330, for further information. The Trust does not maintain a website where these reports are posted. However, the Trust’s filings are posted on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors

Market Risks

You Could Possibly Lose Your Total Investment in the Trust

     Futures, forward and option contracts have a high degree of price variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes. Consequently, you could lose all or a substantial amount of your investment in the Trust.

The Trust is Highly Leveraged

     Because the amount of margin funds necessary to be deposited in order to enter into a futures, forward or option contract position is typically about 2% to 10% of the total value of the contract, Campbell & Company is able to hold positions in the Trust’s account with face values equal to several times the Trust’s net asset value. The ratio of margin to equity is typically 10% to 30%. As a result of this leveraging, even a small movement in the price of a contract can cause major losses.

Changes in Financing Policies or the Imposition of Other Credit Limitations or Restrictions Could Compel the Trust to Liquidate Positions at Disadvantageous Prices

     The Trust may utilize leverage and may depend on the availability of credit in order to finance its portfolio. There can be no assurance that the Trust will be able to maintain adequate financing arrangements under all market circumstances. As a general matter, the dealers that provide financing to the Trust can apply essentially discretionary margin, haircut, financing security and collateral valuation policies. Changes by dealers in such financing policies, or the imposition of other credit limitations or restrictions, whether due to market circumstances or governmental, regulatory or judicial action, may result in large margin calls, loss of financing, forced liquidation of positions at disadvantageous prices, termination of swap and repurchase agreements and cross-defaults to agreements with other dealers. Any such adverse effects may be exacerbated in the event that such limitations or restrictions are imposed suddenly and/or by multiple market participants at or about the same time. The imposition of such limitations or restrictions could compel the Trust to liquidate all or part of its portfolio at disadvantageous prices. In 2009, banks and dealers substantially curtailed financing activities and increased collateral requirements, forcing many hedge funds to liquidate.

Your Investment Could be Illiquid

     Futures, forward and option positions cannot always be liquidated at the desired price; this can occur when the market is thinly traded (i.e., a relatively small volume of buy and sell orders) or in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events in which historical pricing relationships become materially distorted. The Trust may incur material losses and the risk of loss from pricing distortions is compounded by the fact that in disrupted markets many positions become illiquid making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving. The financing available to the Trust from banks, dealers and other counterparties is likely to be restricted in disrupted markets. For example, in 1994, 1998 and again from 2007—2009 there was a sudden restriction of credit by the dealer community that resulted in forced liquidations and major losses for a number of private investment funds. It is possible that in the future, in such situations, Campbell & Company may be unable for some time to liquidate certain unprofitable positions thereby increasing the loss to the Trust from the trade. Additionally, foreign governments may take or be subject to political actions which disrupt the markets in their currency or major exports, such as energy products or metals. Market disruptions caused by unexpected political, military and terrorist events may from time to time cause dramatic losses for the Trust, and such events can result in otherwise historically low-risk strategies performing with unprecedented volatility and risk. Any of these actions could also result in losses to the Trust. A subscription for Units should be considered only by persons financially able to maintain their investment and who can afford the loss of all or substantially all of such investment.

Suspension of Redemptions

     Also, there is no secondary market for the units and none is expected to develop. While the units have redemption rights, there are restrictions. For example, redemptions can occur only at the end of a month. If a large number of redemption requests were to be received at one time, the Trust might have to liquidate positions to satisfy the requests. Such a forced liquidation could adversely affect the Trust and consequently your investment.

     Transfers of interest in the units are subject to limitations, such as 30 days’ advance notice of any intent to transfer. Also, Campbell & Company may deny a request to transfer if it determines that the transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Trust.

Market Disruptions: Governmental Intervention; The Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”)

     The global financial markets have in the past few years gone through pervasive and fundamental disruptions that have led to extensive and unprecedented governmental intervention. Such intervention has in certain cases been implemented on an “emergency” basis, suddenly and substantially eliminating market participants’ ability to continue to implement certain strategies or manage the risk of their outstanding positions. In addition, as one would expect given the complexities of the financial markets and the limited time frame within which governments have felt compelled to take action, these interventions have typically been unclear in scope and application, resulting in confusion and uncertainty which in itself has been materially detrimental to the efficient functioning of the markets as well as previously successful investment strategies.

     The Trust may incur major losses in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events in which historical pricing relationships become materially distorted. The risk of loss from pricing distortions is compounded by the fact that in disrupted markets many positions become illiquid, making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving. The financing available to the Trust from its banks, dealers and other counterparties is typically reduced in disrupted markets. Such a reduction may result in substantial losses to the Trust. Market disruptions may from time to time cause dramatic losses for the Trust, and such events can result in otherwise historically low-risk strategies performing with unprecedented volatility and risk.

     In response to the recent financial crises, the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress proposed sweeping reform of the U.S. financial regulatory system. After over a year of debate, the Reform Act became law in July 2010. The Reform Act seeks to regulate markets, market participants and financial instruments that previously have been unregulated and substantially alters the regulation of many other markets, market participants and financial instruments. Because many provisions of the Reform Act require rulemaking by the applicable regulators before becoming fully effective and the Reform Act mandate multiple agency reports and studies (which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action), it is difficult to predict the impact of the Reform Act on the Trust, Campbell & Company, and the markets in which they trade and invest. The Reform Act could result in certain investment strategies in which the Trust engages or may have otherwise engaged becoming non-viable or non-economic to implement. The Reform Act and regulations adopted pursuant to the Reform Act could have material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Trust.

Speculative Position Limits

     The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and certain exchanges have established position limits on the maximum net long or short futures and options positions which any person or group of persons acting in concert may hold or control in particular futures contracts. The CFTC has adopted a rule generally requiring each domestic U.S. exchange to set speculative position limits, subject to CFTC approval, for all futures contracts and options traded on such exchanges which are not already subject to speculative position limits established by the CFTC or such exchange. The CFTC has jurisdiction to establish speculative position limits with respect to all futures contracts and options traded on exchanges located in the United States, and any such exchange may impose additional limits on positions on that exchange. Generally, no speculative position limits are in effect with respect to the trading of forward contracts or trading on non-U.S. exchanges. All trading accounts owned or managed by Campbell & Company acting on behalf of the Trust, its respective principals and affiliates will be combined for speculative position limit purposes. Because future position limits allow a commodity trading advisor and its principals to control only a limited number of contracts in any one commodity, Campbell & Company and their principals are potentially subject to a conflict among the interests of all accounts the Trust and its principals control which are competing for shares of that limited number of contracts. Although Campbell & Company may be able to achieve the same performance results with OTC substitutes for futures contracts, the OTC market may be subject to differing prices, lesser liquidity and greater counterparty risks than the regulated U.S. commodities exchanges. Campbell & Company may in the future reduce the size of the positions which would otherwise be taken or not trade in certain markets on behalf of the Trust in order to avoid exceeding such limits. Modification of such trades that would otherwise be made by Campbell & Company, if required, could adversely affect the Trust’s operations and profitability. Such modification, if required, could require the Trust to liquidate certain positions more rapidly than might otherwise be desirable, and could adversely affect the performance of the Trust. A violation of speculative position limits by the Trust could lead to regulatory action materially adverse to the Trust’s prospects for profitability.

     The CFTC has proposed and invited public comment regarding a new rule to implement speculative position limits for futures and options contracts in certain energy commodities. Such speculative position limits may apply to traders engaged in trading that is neither for bona fide hedging nor swap dealer risk management purposes. Depending on the outcome of this or any future CFTC regulatory action, the rules concerning speculative position limits may be amended in a manner that is either detrimental or favorable to the Trust. For example, if the amended rules are detrimental to the Trust, the Trust’s ability to invest in additional commodity futures contracts may be limited to the extent these activities would cause the Trust to exceed the applicable speculative position limits.

     In addition, it is possible that the CFTC may propose new rules that would consider futures contracts underlying OTC transactions in calculating position limits. Such a change could alter, perhaps to a material extent the nature of an investment in the Trust to continue to implement its investment approach.

Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets

     The Reform Act includes provisions that comprehensively regulate the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives markets for the first time.

     The Reform Act will mandate that a substantial portion of OTC derivatives must be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. OTC trades submitted for clearing will be subject to minimum initial and variation margin requirements set by the relevant clearinghouse, as well as possible SEC- or CFTC-mandated margin requirements. The regulators also have broad discretion to impose margin requirements on non-cleared OTC derivatives and new requirements will apply to the holding of customer collateral by OTC derivatives dealers. These requirements may increase the amount of collateral the Trust is required to provide and the costs associated with providing it. Although the Reform Act includes limited exemptions from the clearing and margin requirements for so-called “end-users,” the Trust does not expect to be able to rely on such exemptions. In addition, the OTC derivatives dealers with which the Trust executes the majority of its OTC derivatives will not be able to rely on the end-user exemptions under the Reform Act and therefore such dealers will be subject to clearing and margin requirements irrespective of whether the Trust is subject to such requirements. OTC derivative dealers also will be required to post margin to the clearinghouses through which they clear their customers’ trades instead of using such margin in their operations, as is currently permitted. This will increase the OTC derivative dealers’ costs, and these increased costs are expected to be passed through to other market participants in the form of higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trade pricing, and the possible imposition of new or increased fees.

     The SEC and CFTC may also require a substantial portion of derivative transactions that are currently executed on a bi-lateral basis in the OTC markets to be executed through a regulated securities, futures, or swap exchange or execution facility. Such requirements may make it more difficult and costly for investment funds, including the Trust, to enter into highly tailored or customized transactions. They may also render certain strategies in which the Trust might otherwise engage impossible or so costly that they will no longer be economical to implement.

     OTC derivative dealers and major OTC derivatives market participants will be required to register with the SEC and/or CFTC. The Trust or Campbell & Company may be required to register as major participants in the OTC derivatives markets. Dealers and major participants will be subject to minimum capital and margin requirements. These requirements may apply irrespective of whether the OTC derivatives in question are exchange-traded or cleared. OTC derivatives dealers will also be subject to new business conduct standards, disclosure requirements, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, transparency requirements, position limits, limitations on conflicts of interest, and other regulatory burdens. These requirements may further increase the overall costs for OTC derivatives dealers, which costs are also likely to be passed along to market participants. The overall impact of the Reform Act on the Trust is highly uncertain and it is unclear how the OTC derivatives markets will adapt to this new regulatory regime.

Options on Futures and Over-the-Counter Contracts are Speculative and Highly Leveraged

     Options on futures and over-the-counter contracts may be used by the Trust to generate premium income or capital gains. The buyer of an option risks losing the entire purchase price (the premium as well as any commissions and fees) of the option. The writer (seller) of an option risks losing the difference between the premium received for the option and the price of the commodity, futures or forward contract underlying the option which the writer must purchase or deliver upon exercise of the option (which losses can be unlimited). Specific market movements of the commodity, futures or forward contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. Successful options trading requires an accurate assessment of near-term volatility in the underlying instruments, as that volatility is immediately reflected in the price of the option. Correct assessment of market volatility can therefore be of much greater significance in trading options than it is in trading futures and forwards, where volatility may not have as great an effect on price.

An Investment in the Trust May Not Diversify an Overall Portfolio

     Historically, alternative investments such as managed futures funds have been generally non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is no statistically valid relationship between the past performance of futures, forward and option contracts, on the one hand, and stocks or bonds, on the other hand. Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be exactly opposite.

     Because of this non-correlation, the Trust cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market or vice versa. The futures, forward and option markets are fundamentally different from the securities markets in that for every gain made in futures, forward and option trading, there is an equal and offsetting loss. If the Trust does not perform in a manner non-correlated with the general financial markets or does not perform successfully, you will obtain no diversification benefits by investing in the units and the Trust may have no gains to offset your losses from other investments.

Trading Risks

There are Disadvantages to Making Trading Decisions Based Primarily on Technical Market Data

     The trading systems used by the managing operator for the Trust are primarily technical. The profitability of trading under these systems depends on, among other things, the occurrence of significant price movements, up or down, in futures, forward and option prices. Such price movements may not develop; there have been periods in the past without such price movements.

     The likelihood of the units being profitable could be materially diminished during periods when events external to the markets themselves have an important impact on prices. During such periods, Campbell & Company’s historic price analysis could establish positions on the wrong side of the price movements caused by such events.

Increased Competition from Other Trend-Following Traders Could Reduce Campbell & Company’s Profitability

     There has been a dramatic increase in the volume of assets managed by trend-following trading systems like some of the Campbell & Company programs. For example, in 1980, the assets in the managed futures industry were estimated at approximately $300 million; by the end of 2009, this estimate had risen to approximately $213.6 billion. Increased trading competition from other trend-following traders could operate to the detriment of the Trust. It may become more difficult for the Trust to implement its trading strategy if other trading advisors using technical systems are, at the same time, also attempting to initiate or liquidate futures, forward or option positions, or otherwise alter trading patterns.

Limits Imposed by Futures Exchanges or Other Regulatory Organizations, Such As Speculative Position Limits and Daily Price Fluctuation Limits, May Alter Trading Decisions for the Trust

     The CFTC and U.S. futures exchanges have established limits, known as speculative position limits, on the maximum net long or net short positions that any person may hold or control in certain futures and option on futures contracts. Most U.S. futures exchanges also have established “daily price fluctuation limits” which preclude the execution of trades at prices outside of the limit. Contract prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. All accounts controlled by Campbell & Company, including the account of the Trust, are combined for speculative position limit purposes. If positions in those accounts were to approach the level of the particular speculative position limit, or if prices were to approach the level of the daily limit, these limits could cause a modification of Campbell & Company’s trading decisions for the Trust or force the liquidation of certain futures or options on futures positions. Either of these actions may not be in the best interest of the investors. From time to time, the CFTC or the exchanges may suspend trading in market disruption circumstances. In these cases, it is possible that Campbell & Company, as trading advisor, could be required to maintain a losing position that it otherwise would exit and miss a profit opportunity.

Increase in Assets Under Management May Make Profitable Trading More Difficult

     The managing operator has not agreed to limit the amount of additional equity which it may manage, and is actively engaged in raising assets for existing and new accounts, including the Trust. Should the amount of equity Campbell & Company manages increase, it may be more difficult for Campbell & company to trade profitably because of the difficult of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance. Accordingly, such increases in equity under management may require Campbell & Company to modify its trading decisions for the Trust which could have a detrimental effect on your investment. Such considerations may also cause Campbell & Company to eliminate smaller markets from consideration for inclusion in its Global Diversified Large Portfolio, reducing the range of markets in which trading opportunities may be pursued. Campbell & Company reserves the right to make distributions of profits to unitholders in an effort to control asset growth. In addition, Campbell & Company may have an incentive to favor other accounts because the compensation received from some other accounts does exceed the compensation it receives from managing the Trust’s account. Because records with respect to other accounts are not accessible to unitholders in the Trust, the unitholders will not be able to determine if Campbell & Company is favoring other accounts.

Investors Will Not be Able to View the Trust’s Holdings on a Daily Basis, Which May Result in Unanticipated Losses

        The managing operator makes the Trust’s trading decisions. While the managing operator receives daily trade confirmations from the futures broker and over-the-counter counterparty, the Trust’s trading results are reported to unitholders monthly. Accordingly, an investment in the Trust does not offer unitholders the same transparency, i.e., an ability to review all investment positions daily, that a personal trading account offers.

Tax Risks

Investors are Taxed Based on Their Share of Trust Income and Gain

     Investors are taxed each year on their share of the Trust’s income and gain, if any, irrespective of whether they redeem any units or receive any cash distribution from the Trust. The managing operator has the authority to make such distributions at any time in its sole discretion.

     All performance information is presented on a pre-tax basis; the investors (other than tax-exempt investors) who experienced such performance had to pay the related taxes from other sources.

Tax Could be Due from Investors on Their Share of the Trust’s Ordinary Income Despite Overall Losses

     Investors may be required to pay tax on their allocable share of the Trust’s ordinary income, which in the case of the Trust is the Trust’s interest income, gain on some foreign futures contracts, and certain other investment assets, even though the Trust incurs overall losses. Capital losses of individual taxpayers can be used only to offset capital gains and, in the case of non-corporate investors, $3,000 of ordinary income each year. Consequently, if an individual investor were allocated $5,000 of ordinary income and $10,000 of capital losses, the investor would owe tax on $2,000 of ordinary income even though the investor would have a $5,000 economic loss for the year. The remaining $7,000 capital loss could be used in subsequent years to offset capital gain and ordinary income, but subject to the same annual limitation on its deductibility against ordinary income.

There Could be a Limit on the Deductibility of Management and Performance Fees

     Although the Trust treats the management and performance fees paid to the managing operator as ordinary and necessary business expenses, upon an IRS audit, the Trust may be required to treat such fees as “investment advisory fees” if the Trust’s trading activities did not constitute a trade or business for tax purposes. Investment advisory fees are subject to substantial restrictions on deductibility for federal income tax purposes. Such treatment would likely create or increase the tax liability of non-corporate unitholders.

Other Risks

Fees and Commissions are Charged Regardless of Profitability and are Subject to Change

     The Trust is subject to substantial charges payable irrespective of profitability, in addition to performance fees which are payable based on the Trust’s profitability. Included in these charges are brokerage fees and operating expenses. On the Trust’s forward and option trading, “bid-ask” spreads and prime brokerage fees are incorporated into the pricing of forward and option contracts by the counterparties in addition to the brokerage fees paid by the Trust. It is not possible to quantify the “bid-ask” spreads paid by the Trust because the Trust cannot determine the profit its counterparty is making on the forward and option transactions. Such spreads can at times be significant.

The Trust’s Service Providers Could Fail

     The institutions with which the Trust trades or invests may encounter financial difficulties that impair the operational capabilities or the capital position of the Trust. A futures broker is generally required by U.S. law to segregate all funds received from such broker’s customers from such broker’s proprietary assets. If the futures broker did not do so to the full extent required by law, the assets of the Trust might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the futures broker. Furthermore, in the event of the futures broker’s bankruptcy, the Trust could be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the futures broker’s combined customer accounts, even though certain property specifically traceable to the Trust (for example, Treasury bills deposited by the Trust with the futures broker as margin) was held by the futures broker. Furthermore, dealers in forward contracts are not regulated by the Commodity Exchange Act and are not obligated to segregate customer assets. The futures brokers have been the subject of regulatory and private causes of action.

          Although the managing operator regularly monitors the financial condition of the counterparties it uses, if the Trust’s counterparties were to become insolvent or the subject of liquidation proceedings in the United States (either under the Securities Investor Protection Act of the United States Bankruptcy Code), there exists the risk that the recovery of the Trust’s assets from such counterparty will be delayed or be a value less than the value of the assets originally entrusted to such counterparty.

Inadequate Models Could Negatively Affect the Trust’s Portfolio

     Campbell & Company’s trading is highly model driven, and is materially subject to possible flaws in the models. As market dynamics (for example, due to changed market conditions and participants) shift over time, a previously highly successful model often becomes outdated and inaccurate, sometimes without Campbell & Company recognizing that fact before substantial losses are incurred. In particular, the Trust may incur major losses in the event of disrupted markets and other extraordinary events that cause Campbell & Company’s pricing models to generate prices which deviate from the market. The risk of loss to the Trust in the case of disrupted markets is compounded by the number of different investment models of pricing, each of which may independently become wholly unpredictable during market disruptions. In addition, in disrupted derivatives markets, many positions may become illiquid, making it difficult or impossible to close out positions against which the markets are moving. There can be no assurance that Campbell & Company will be successful in continuing to develop and maintain effective quantitative models.

Investors Must Not Rely on the Past Performance of Either Campbell & Company or the Trust in Deciding Whether to Buy Units

     The future performance of the Trust is not predictable, and no assurance can be given that the Trust will perform successfully in the future in as much as past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The managing operator’s trading systems are continually evolving and the fact that the Trust and the managing operator may have traded successfully in the past does not mean that they will do so in the future. Additionally, the markets in which the Trust operates have been severely disrupted over the past year or more, so results observed in earlier periods may have little relevance to the results observable in the current environment.

     The past performance of the Trust may not be construed as an indication of future results. The personnel of Campbell & Company responsible for managing the investment portfolio have substantial experience in managing investments and private investment funds and have provided and continue to provide advisory and management services to clients and private and registered investment funds.

Parties to the Trust Have Conflicts of Interest

     Campbell & Company has not established any formal procedures to resolve the following conflicts of interest. Consequently, there is no independent control over how Campbell & Company resolves these conflicts which can be relied upon by investors as ensuring that the Trust is treated equitably with other Campbell & Company clients.

     Campbell & Company has a conflict of interest because it acts as the managing operator and sole trading advisor for the Trust. Since Campbell & Company acts as both trading advisor and managing operator for the Trust, it is very unlikely that its advisory contract will be terminated by the Trust. The fees payable to Campbell & Company were established by it and were not the subject of arm’s-length negotiation. These fees consist of a management fee of up to 4% (of which 2% is retained) and a 20% performance fee. Campbell & Company, as managing operator, determines whether or not distributions are made and it receives increased fees to the extent distributions are not made. Campbell & Company, as managing operator, has the authority to make such distributions at any time in its sole discretion.

     Selling agents will be entitled to ongoing compensation as a result of their clients remaining in the Trust, so a conflict exists between the selling agent’s interest in maximizing compensation and in advising its clients to make investment decisions in the client’s best interest.

There are No Independent Experts Representing Investors

     Campbell & Company has consulted with counsel, accountants and other experts regarding the formation and operation of the Trust. No counsel has been appointed to represent the unitholders in connection with the offering of the units. Accordingly, each prospective investor should consult his own legal, tax and financial advisers regarding the desirability of an investment in the Trust.

The Trust Places Significant Reliance on Campbell & Company and the Incapacity of its Principals Could Adversely Affect the Trust

     Unitholders are not entitled to participate in the management of the Trust or the conduct of its business. Rather, the Trust is wholly dependent upon the services of the managing operator. There can be no assurance that such services will be available for any length of time following the term of the Advisory Agreement. Furthermore, the incapacity of the managing operator’s principals could have a material and adverse effect on the managing operator’s ability to discharge its obligations under the Advisory Agreement. However, there is no individual principal at Campbell & Company whose absence would result in a material adverse effect on Campbell & Company’s ability to adequately carry out its advisory responsibilities.

The Trust Could Terminate Before You Achieve Your Investment Objective Causing Potential Loss of Your Investment or Upsetting Your Investment Portfolio

     The managing operator may withdraw from the Trust upon 90 days’ notice, which would cause the Trust to terminate. Other events, such as a long-term substantial loss suffered by the Trust, could also cause the Trust to terminate before the expiration of its stated term. This could cause you to liquidate your investments and upset the overall maturity and timing of your investment portfolio. If the registrations with the CFTC or memberships in the National Futures Association of Campbell & Company or the futures broker were revoked or suspended, such entity would no longer be able to provide services to the Trust.

The Trust Is Not A Regulated Investment Company and Therefore Is Subject to Different Protections Than a Regulated Investment Company

     Although the Trust and Campbell & Company are subject to regulation by the CFTC, the Trust is not an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Campbell & Company is not registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Accordingly, you do not have the protections afforded by those statutes which, for example, requires investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulates the relationship between the adviser and the investment company.

Forwards, Options, Swaps, Hybrids and Other Derivatives are Not Subject to CFTC Regulation; Therefore, the Trust Will Not Receive the Same Protections on These Transactions

     The Trust trades foreign exchange contracts and options in the interbank market. In the future, the Trust may also trade swap agreements, hybrid instruments and other off-exchange contracts. Swap agreements involve trading income streams such as fixed rate for floating rate interest. Hybrids are instruments which combine features of a security with those of a futures contract. At this time, there is no exchange or clearinghouse for these contracts and they are not regulated by the CFTC. The Trust will not receive the protections which are provided by the Commodity Exchange Act or CFTC regulations in respect of these transactions.

The Trust is Subject to Foreign Market Credit and Regulatory Risk

     A substantial portion of Campbell & Company’s trades takes place on markets or exchanges outside the United States. From time to time, over 50% of the Trust’s overall market exposure could involve positions taken on foreign markets. The risk of loss in trading foreign futures contracts and foreign options can be substantial. Participation in foreign futures contracts and foreign options transactions involves the execution and clearing of trades on, or subject to the rules of, a foreign board of trade. Non-U.S. markets may not be subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts. None of the CFTC, NFA or any domestic exchange regulates activities of any foreign boards of trade, including the execution, delivery and clearing of transactions, nor do they have the power to compel enforcement of the rules of a foreign board of trade or any applicable foreign laws. Trading on foreign exchanges also presents the risks of exchange controls, expropriation, taxation, and government disruptions.

The Trust is Subject to Foreign Exchange Risk

     The price of any foreign futures or foreign options contract and, therefore, the potential profit and loss thereon, may be affected by any variance in the foreign exchange rate between the time a position is established and the time it is liquidated, offset or exercised. Certain foreign exchanges may also be in a more or less developmental stage so that prior price histories may not be indicative of current price dynamics. In addition, the Trust may not have the same access to certain positions on foreign exchanges as do local traders, and the historical market data on which Campbell & Company bases its strategies may not be as reliable or accessible as it is in the United States. The rights of clients (such as the Trust) in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a non-U.S. market or broker are also likely to be more limited than in the case of U.S. markets or brokers.

Transfers Could be Restricted

     Unitholders may transfer or assign units only upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the managing operator and only if the managing operator is satisfied that the transfer complies with applicable laws and would not result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Trust. A transferee shall not become a substituted unitholder without the written consent of the managing operator.

Restrictions on Investment by ERISA Plans, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

     The managing operator anticipates that the underlying assets of the Trust may be considered for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended, to be assets of certain employee benefit plans and other Plans that purchase units. Under such circumstances, the investments of the Trust and the activities of the managing operator will be subject to and, in certain cases, limited by, ERISA and the Code.

     When considering an investment in the Trust of the assets of an ERISA Plan, a fiduciary with respect to such plan should consider, among other things: (i) the definition of “Plan assets” under ERISA and regulations issued by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) regarding the definition of Plan assets; (ii) whether the investment satisfies the diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1) of ERISA; (iii) whether the investment satisfies the prudence requirements of Section 404(a)(1) of ERISA; and (iv) that there will be no secondary market in which such fiduciary can sell or otherwise dispose of the units.

A Single-Advisor Fund May be More Volatile Than a Multi-Advisor Fund

     The Trust is a single-advisor managed futures fund. Potential investors should understand that many managed futures funds are structured as multi-advisor funds in order to attempt to control risk and reduce volatility through combining advisors whose historical performance records have exhibited a significant degree of non-correlation with each other. As a single-advisor managed futures fund, the Trust may have increased performance volatility and a higher risk of loss than investment vehicles employing multiple advisors.

The Performance Fee Could be an Incentive to Make Riskier Investments

     Campbell & Company employs a speculative strategy for the Trust, and receives performance fees based on the trading profits earned by it for the Trust. Campbell & Company would not agree to manage the Trust’s account in the absence of such a performance fee arrangement. Accordingly, Campbell & Company may make investments that are riskier than might be made if the Trust’s assets were managed by a trading advisor that did not require performance-based compensation.

The Trust May Distribute Profits to Unitholders at Inopportune Times

     Campbell & Company reserves the right to make distributions of profits of the Trust to the unitholders at any time in its sole discretion in order to control the growth of the assets under Campbell & Company’s management. Unitholders will have no choice in receiving these distributions as income, and may receive little notice that these distributions are being made. Distributions may be made at an inopportune time for the unitholders.

Potential Inability to Trade or Report Due to Systems Failure Could Adversely Affect the Trust

     Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the proper functioning of its internal computer systems. Accordingly, systems failures, whether due to third party failures upon which such systems are dependent or the failure of Campbell & Company’s hardware or software, could disrupt trading or make trading impossible until such a failure is remedied. Any such failure, and consequential inability to trade (even for a short time), could, in certain market conditions, cause the Trust to experience significant trading losses or to miss opportunities for profitable trading. Additionally, any such failures could cause a temporary delay in reports to investors.

Failure to Receive Timely and Accurate Market Data from Third Party Vendors Could Cause Disruptions or the Inability to Trade

     Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the receipt of timely and accurate market data from third party vendors. Accordingly, the failure to receive such data in a timely manner or the receipt of inaccurate data, whether due to the acts or omissions of such third party vendors or otherwise, could disrupt trading to the detriment of the Trust or make trading impossible until such failure or inaccuracy is remedied. Any such failure or inaccuracy could, in certain market conditions, cause the Trust to experience significant trading losses, effect trades in a manner which it otherwise would not have done, or miss opportunities for profitable trading. For example, the receipt of inaccurate market data may cause Campbell & Company to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would not have established (or exited), or fail to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would have established (or exited), and any subsequent correction of such inaccurate data may cause Campbell & Company to reverse such action or inaction, all of which may ultimately be to the detriment of the Trust.

Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments

          None.

Item 2.		Properties

          The Registrant does not use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. Its assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash, short-term time deposits and other fixed income securities.

Item 3.		Legal Proceedings

          Campbell & Company is not aware of any material legal proceedings to which the Registrant is a party or to which any of their assets are subject.

Item 4.		(Removed and Reserved)

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

          Units of Beneficial Interest are not publicly traded. Units may be transferred or redeemed subject to the conditions imposed by the Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement. As of December 31, 2010, there were 783 Unitholders and 27,273.338 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in the Series A, 978 Unitholders and 99,363.213 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in the Series B and 130 Unitholders and 4,160.119 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in the Series W Registrant.

          Campbell & Company has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Registrant will make to its Unitholders. Campbell & Company has not made any distributions as of the date hereof.

The Registrant has no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data

Dollars in thousands, except per Unit amounts

          The following summarized financial information is for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006.

						For the Year Ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006
Total Assets		$	354,307			$	375,584			$	533,225			$	832,931			$	1,179,711
Total Unitholders’ Capital			346,450				365,318				501,507				774,739				1,153,999
Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions)			46,833				(10,341	)			25,343				(136,663	)			64,620
Net Income (Loss)			34,157				(27,085	)			10,211				(135,306	)			63,249
Net Income (Loss) Per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit *
Series A**			390.52				(58.14	)			(32.19	)			n/a				n/a
Series B			218.49				(158.24	)			41.60				(360.46	)			153.91
Series W***			386.22				79.02				n/a				n/a				n/a
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit
Series A**			250.82				(159.98	)			(35.35	)			n/a				n/a
Series B			276.71				(148.25	)			31.11				(370.14	)			168.95
Series W***			279.59				(164.27	)			n/a				n/a				n/a

The following summarized quarterly financial information (unaudited) presents the results of operations for the three-month periods ending March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2010 and 2009.

		1st Qtr.				2nd Qtr.				3rd Qtr.				4th Qtr.
		2010				2010				2010				2010
Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions)		$	(10,161	)		$	646			$	27,788			$	28,560
Net Income (Loss)			(13,470	)			(2,582	)			25,177				25,032
Net Income (Loss) per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit *
Series A**			(55.42	)			(24.59	)			194.08				181.01
Series B			(92.20	)			(17.52	)			184.09				194.21
Series W***			(30.26	)			(12.07	)			191.96				180.85

		1st Qtr.				2nd Qtr.				3rd Qtr.				4th Qtr.
		2010				2010				2010				2010
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit
Series A**			(89.20	)			(22.72	)			184.12				178.62
Series B			(86.88	)			(20.05	)			188.82				194.82
Series W***			(81.80	)			(14.50	)			197.64				178.25
Net Asset Value per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit at the End of the Period
Series A**			2,275.84				2,253.12				2,437.24				2,615.86
Series B			2,292.92				2,272.87				2,461.69				2,656.51
Series W***			2,318.09				2,303.59				2,501.23				2,679.48

		1st Qtr.				2nd Qtr.				3rd Qtr.				4th Qtr.
		2009				2009				2009				2009
Total Net Trading Gain (Loss) (includes brokerage commissions)		$	2,461			$	(27,874	)		$	16,387			$	(1,315	)
Net Income (Loss)			(2,502	)			(32,170	)			12,495				(4,908	)
Net Income (Loss) per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit *
Series A**			(21.39	)			(147.19	)			90.04				(37.35	)
Series B			(12.89	)			(179.53	)			73.55				(30.79	)
Series W***			(47.16	)			(149.28	)			119.32				(18.04	)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit
Series A**			(17.42	)			(180.76	)			72.37				(34.17	)
Series B			(14.29	)			(178.27	)			75.67				(31.36	)
Series W***			(48.18	)			(172.55	)			82.00				(25.54	)
Net Asset Value per Managing Operator and Other Unitholder Unit at the End of the Period
Series A**			2,507.60				2,326.84				2,399.21				2,365.04
Series B			2,513.76				2,335.49				2,411.16				2,379.80
Series W***			2,515.98				2,343.43				2,425.43				2,399.89

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction

          The offering of its Units of Beneficial Interest commenced on January 2, 1996 at the time the Trust succeeded to the operations of the Campbell Fund Limited Partnership as described in Item 1. The offering of Units is continuous and ongoing.

          Effective August 31, 2008, the Trust began offering Series A, Series B, and Series W units. The units in the Trust prior to that date became Series B units. Series B units are only available for additional investment by existing holders of Series B units.

Critical Accounting Policies

          The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Management believes that the estimates utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable and prudent; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The Trust’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 of the Financial Statements.

          The Trust records all investments at fair value in its financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of realized and change in unrealized trading gain (loss) in the Statements of Operations. Generally, fair values are based on market prices; however, in certain circumstances, estimates are involved in determining fair value in the absence of an active market closing price (e.g. forward and option contracts which are traded in the inter-bank market).

Capital Resources

          The Trust will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering, and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Trust’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

          The Trust maintains 40-80% of its net asset value in cash, cash equivalents or other liquid positions in its cash management program over and above that needed to post as collateral for trading. These funds are available to meet redemptions each month. After redemptions and additions are taken into account each month, the trade level of the Trust are adjusted and positions in the instruments the Trust trades are added or liquidated on a pro-rata basis to meet those increases or decreases in trade levels.

Liquidity

          Most United States futures exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits”. During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has reached the daily limit for that day, positions in that contract can neither be taken nor liquidated. Futures prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Trust from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Trust to substantial losses which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Trust may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices, if little trading in such contracts is taking place. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Trust’s futures trading operations, the Trust’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

          The entire offering proceeds, without deductions, will be credited to the Trust’s bank, brokerage and/or cash management accounts. The Trust meets margin requirements for its trading activities by depositing cash or U.S. government securities with the futures broker and the over-the-counter counterparties. This does not reduce the risk of loss from trading activities. The Trust receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Trust assets.

          Approximately 10% to 30% of the Trust’s assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures broker, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury bills in segregated accounts with the futures broker pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. Approximately 10% to 30% of the Trust’s assets are deposited with over-the-counter counterparties in order to initiate and maintain forward contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparties.

          The managing operator deposits the majority of those assets of the Trust that are not required to be deposited as margin with the futures broker and over-the-counter counterparty in a custodial account with Northern Trust Company. The assets deposited in the custodial account with Northern Trust Company are segregated. The custodial account constitutes approximately 40% to 80% of the Trust’s assets and is invested directly by Wilmington Trust Investment Management LLC (“Wilmington”) and Horizon Cash Management LLC (“Horizon”). Wilmington and Horizon are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Wilmington and Horizon do not guarantee any interest or profits will accrue on the Trust’s assets in the custodial account. Wilmington and Horizon will invest according to agreed upon investment guidelines that are modeled after those investments allowed by the futures broker as defined under The Commodity Exchange Act, Title 17, Part 1, § 1.25 Investment of customer funds. Investments can include, but are not limited to, (i) U.S. Government Securities, Government Agency Securities, Municipal Securities, banker acceptances and certificates of deposits; (ii) commercial paper; and (iii) corporate debt.

          The Trust occasionally receives margin calls (requests to post more collateral) from its futures broker or over-the-counter counterparties, which are met by moving the required portion of the assets held in the custody account at Northern Trust to the margin accounts. In the past three years, the Trust has not needed to liquidate any position as a result of a margin call.

          The Trust’s assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested with or loaned to Campbell & Company or any affiliated entities.

Off-Balance Sheet Risk

          The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Trust trades in futures, forward and option contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Trust, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Trust at the same time, and if the Trust’s trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Trust, the Trust could lose all of its assets and the Unitholders would realize a 100% loss. Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator (who also acts as trading advisor), minimizes market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 30%.

          In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, forward and option contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Trust. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

          In the case of forward and option contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions; thus there may be a greater counterparty credit risk. Campbell & Company trades for the Trust only with those counterparties which it believes to be creditworthy. All positions of the Trust are valued each day on a mark-to-market basis. There can be no assurance that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Trust.

Disclosures About Certain Trading Activities that Include Non-Exchange Traded Contracts Accounted for at Fair Value

          The Trust invests in futures, forward currency and option on forward currency contracts. The fair value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is determined by the various futures exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period. The Fair value of forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) of the last business day of the reporting period or based on the market value of its exchange-traded equivalent. The fair value of option (non-exchange traded) contracts is calculated by applying an industry-standard adaptation of the Black-Scholes options valuation model to foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates and option implied volatilities quoted as of 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period.

Results of Operations

          The returns for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 for Series B were 11.63%, (5.86)%, and 1.25%, respectively. The returns for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period October 1, 2008 (commencement of trading) through December 31, 2008 for Series A was 10.61%, (6.34)%, and (1.38)%, respectively. The return for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period March 1, 2009 (commencement of trading) through December 31, 2009 for Series W was 11.65% and (6.41)%, respectively.

          The following is a discussion of the management and performance fees accrued and paid. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Trust accrued management fees in the amount of $13,137,518, $16,971,300, and $25,405,845, respectively, and paid management fees in the amounts of $13,224,458, $17,509,152, and $26,410,933, respectively.

          During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Trust accrued performance fees in the amount of $381,483, $0, and $0, respectively, and paid performance fees in the amounts of $0, $0, and $0, respectively.

2010

          Of the 10.61% return for year ended 2010 for Series A, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.43% due to investment income, offset by approximately 5.55% due to brokerage fees, management fees, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

          Of the 11.63% return for year ended 2010 for Series B, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.40% due to investment income, offset by approximately 4.50% due to brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B.

          Of the 11.65% return for year ended 2010 for Series W, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.43% due to investment income, offset by approximately 4.51% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and offering costs borne by Series W.

          An analysis of the 15.73% gross trading gains for the Trust for the year by sector is as follows:

Sector		% Gain (Loss)
Interest Rates			12.12	%
Commodities			3.21
Currencies			2.94
Stock Indices			(2.54	)
			15.73	%

          The New Year began with an equity sell-off in the second half of the month as global confidence in a steady recovery, again, begins to waver, resulting in trading losses for the Trust’s net long equity indices positions. Primary drivers were related to: (1) China’s efforts to manage growth; (2) questionable stability of the European Union as Greece potentially defaults on sovereign debt; and (3) the potential heavy-handed regulation of the U.S. banking system. As the global risk trade unwound, the Trust’s commodity positions also produced losses, largely in the energy complex and in base metals. The global negative news detracted from a relative positive earnings season and signs of improved economic data. Further losses were recorded in currency trading as the U.S. Dollar was, once again, seen as a safe haven as the economic health of several nations was called into question. Marginal gains were recorded in fixed income as we were able to benefit from the steepening of the yield curve as a result of short-term interest rates being kept at extremely low levels by global central banks.

          The first half of February was somewhat subdued as the market digested mixed U.S. employment numbers versus the unemployment rate. By mid-month, the Federal Reserve surprised the markets by decided to hike the discount rate, in a clear sign that the pace of their exit strategy may be more aggressive than originally anticipated. Our long position in short-term rates, both in the U.S. and Europe, fueled strong gains in the sector for the remainder of the month. Gains were also recorded in currency trading as the Euro currency weakened against most majors on accelerated sovereign fears evidenced by the record high cost of insuring Greek and Portuguese debt. Global equity indices trading produced small losses for the Trust as a result of dealing with diverse global macroeconomic challenges (weakening Euro, China central bank intervention and U.S. employment and earnings season results). While the market finished generally negative in Europe and Asia, the U.S. managed to record a gain on largely upbeat fourth quarter earnings announcements with many S&P constituents beating consensus expectations. Commodity trading resulted in generally negative results as the structural imbalances in Europe, and the strong relative performance of the U.S. economy versus the Eurozone helped “de-link” Europe from the risk trade, keeping commodities in alignment with U.S. stocks. While energy prices rallied for most of the month, precious metals sold off early only to turn positive as the market used gold as a safe haven against Eurozone turmoil.

          March proved to be a very strong month for trends as our long positions in energies and base metals benefited from prices moving higher on climbing global economic growth prospects. Global equity indices also provided gains for the Trust’s long positions as prices surged on renewed merger and acquisition activity, positive news centered on economic releases, and subdued fears regarding Greece’s finances. Marginal gains were recorded in the foreign exchange markets as the return of the carry trade pushed commodity linked currencies higher. Almost all central banks have acknowledged that the worst has passed; however, the lack of flexibility to induce fresh fiscal or monetary stimulus has forced a lower for longer interest rate policy globally. The Trust’s net gains were partially offset by losses in the fixed income markets from long positions in U.S. Treasury futures as prices fell during the month. In the U.S. fixed income market, heavy supply put pressure on bond prices, and U.S. Treasury yields were higher than swap yields for the first time on record.

          April performance was led by strong gains in the fixed income markets from long positions in Europe and from U.S. bond prices that moved higher during the month as the Greece sovereign debt concerns and fears of contagion played center stage in global markets. Currency trading also benefited from the sovereign debt fears and from perceived signs of positive economic growth beginning to materialize. Further gains were recorded in energy and precious metals, as energy markets continued its high correlation to the S&P and investor demand for precious metals continued to grow. Marginal losses were incurred in base metals trading as these markets moved lower on U.S. dollar strength. Global equity indices trading produced flat performance, with net longs across the board producing positive results in the U.S., negative results in Europe, and flat performance in Asia.

          As European sovereign debt concerns persisted and China tightened credit in an attempt to cool overheating in its property sector, the decline in equity markets by the end of May was wide-spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Certainly the “flash crash” on May 6^th only added to the unsettling nature of equity market price behavior throughout the month. While the Trust experienced losses in equity indices, gains in fixed income help offset the flight from risky assets in favor of government debt. Commodity trading was difficult for the Trust, particularly in the energy sector, as the complex fell in tandem with the equity markets until a late month bounce. While BP’s spill in the Gulf continued to flow uncontrollably, the disaster has not significantly affected the supply of oil into the U.S. to date. Along with the scare in Greece, the Euro came under pressure against the U.S. Dollar as comments from Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke raised concerns over the Eurozone’s bank funding. The U.S. Dollar was, once again, viewed as a safe position trade as risk aversion, volatility and liquidity dominated currency markets contributing to gains in the foreign exchange sector for the Trust.

          In June, another month of the “risk off” trade gave government bonds a bid, which produced healthy gains from long global fixed income positions. Unfortunately, these gains were offset by losses in equity indices, foreign exchange and commodities. Long equity positions suffered from an equity sell-off, which primarily stemmed from weaker than expected U.S. and Chinese economic data, negative corporate news and interbank funding concerns in the European region. Foreign exchange trading generated losses primarily from the Trust’s short Swiss Franc position as the currency rallied 7% vs. the U.S. Dollar based on Swiss National Bank comments softening its intervention language. Commodity trading produced minimal losses, largely from our trading in natural gas futures which ended up 3.6% after finally breaking out of a three-month range. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has not been a significant factor on short-term price movements but most analysts agree that the real impact will be long-term as the cost of production is almost sure to go higher on the back of tighter regulation.

          Catalysts for the equity rally in July hinged on strong economic data out of Europe, positive results from European bank stress tests and an increase in positive sentiment out of China. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones recorded gains of approximately 7% in July, adding another twist to their rollercoaster paths. Small gains were recorded in the European and U.S. equity markets from long positions in stock index futures as over-sold conditions paved the way for a reversal higher. Stocks rallied on better-than-expected second quarter earnings, increased M&A activity, higher dividends and additional buybacks. The Trust experienced losses in commodities, primarily from short positions in crude oil and long positions in precious metals. The correlation between equities and energies remained high and the rally in global equities sparked profit taking, reducing investor demand for gold as a safe haven. The Trust had additional losses in foreign exchange from short positions in the Euro/Yen cross, as the Euro showed renewed signs of life, appreciating more than 4% against the Yen. Losses were offset by gains in equities trading and in short-term fixed income markets from long positions in Eurodollar interest rate futures. Weaker-than-expected U.S. economic data led the market to believe that the U.S. Federal Reserve will need to keep interest rates low for an extended period.

          The release of the August U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes resulted in yet another sell-off of “risk assets,” which helped contributed to the rise in fixed income prices. Yields reached multi-year lows in the U.S., Europe, and U.K., resulting in gains from the Trust’s long fixed income positions, especially on the long end of the curve. Smaller gains were realized in the commodity markets, primarily in precious metals. Gold fully retraced July’s corrective sell-off, with its August month-end market value closing several ticks higher than the June close. The Trust’s long gold position benefitted from gold’s safe-haven status, as well as from news out of China, the world’s largest consumer and producer of gold, that they will allow greater access to trading of the metal. The Trust’s long silver position also produced favorable results due to its lock-step trading with gold. Long global equity indices holdings resulted in losses for the month. Weak labor and housing data releases, coupled with the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s downgrade of its assessment of the U.S. economic outlook, contributed to the poor performance of U.S. market indices. Japanese equities fared worse, as the stubbornly strong Japanese Yen weighs on Japanese exporters. By month-end, the Euro Stoxx 50 lost nearly 4.5%, the S&P 500 fell about 4.75%, and the Japanese Nikkei lost almost 7.5%. Additional losses were recorded in the foreign exchange markets from short positions in the Euro/Yen cross as the Euro appreciated more than 4% against the Japanese Yen. The Euro moved higher against most currencies as investors covered short positions as the Euro showed renewed signs of life.

          Asset prices during the month of September were driven by FOMC hinting that the Federal Reserve is ready and willing to undergo a second round of quantitative easing. While the U.S. Dollar and interest rates fell, equities and commodities rose significantly. Commodity trading was the dominant contributor to positive performance for the month, particularly in precious and base metals, grains and soft commodities. Gold prices reached all-time highs, while silver rallied 12% to levels not seen since the early 1980s. Aluminum and nickel prices also posted double-digit increases during the month. Elevated demand and weather-related supply concerns pushed sugar, cotton and corn prices up over 22%, 17% and 10%, respectively. While commodity trading was a strong driver, foreign exchange was also a material contributor to performance, particularly from commodity-linked currencies. The month brought U.S. Dollar weakness against all major currencies as investors bet the Federal Reserve would implement a fresh round of asset purchases to jump-start the slowing U.S. economy. Smaller gains were recorded in the equity markets as prices surged higher on fewer concerns of a “double-dip” U.S. recession and a continued increase in M&A activity. Stocks in Asia took the lead, followed by the U.S. and Europe, which lagged due to ongoing sovereign debt level concerns. A portion of the Portfolio’s gains were offset by losses in fixed income markets as bond prices were extremely volatile during September.

          Financial markets in October were fixated on the U.S. Federal Reserve’s intentions to engage in a second round of Quantitative Easing (“QE2”). In September, markets began pricing in the anticipated QE2 stimulus, which clearly continued into October. Over the course of the month the U.S. Treasury markets shifted from speculating on a future deflationary environment to pricing in future inflation in the TIPS market. Perhaps the markets were reacting to Chairman Bernanke’s comments that inflation is too low and unemployment is too high. Commodity trading was a primary driver of gains for the Trust as silver and gold reached new highs mid-month, and zinc and copper surged higher in the base metal category. Sugar and cotton both rose over 22% on supply/demand imbalances, while grains continued their upward trend with corn leading the way in performance for the sector. The growing expectations of QE2 in the U.S., third quarter earnings that largely beat analyst estimates and market expectations for a congressional change of power at the mid-term elections, propelled the global equity markets higher. The Trust recorded strong gains in stock index trading, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. QE2 also took center stage in currency trading, allowing the Trust to benefit from a weaker U.S. Dollar against most major currencies. Asian-based currencies and commodity-linked currencies were, in particular, profitable. Minimal losses were recorded in the fixed income markets as positive intra-month economic data caused market participants to question if additional QE on a global level was warranted on such a massive scale.

          After much anticipation and debate, the second effort by the U.S. Federal Reserve to stimulate the U.S. economy through government bond purchases. Perhaps a case of “buy the rumor, sell the fact,” bond prices fell following the announcement and continued to fall for the remainder of the month generating losses for the Trust in fixed income trading. In currency trading, once QE2 was announced, the U.S. Dollar never looked back. The Trust’s short U.S. Dollar position was significantly reduced during the month; however, small losses in currency trading were incurred. In Europe, the Euro dropped below 1.30 for the first time in more than 10 weeks as speculation leaned toward a worsening debt crisis, and unemployment in the region rose to the highest level in more than 12 years. Commodities were volatile and mixed, generating small gains in the sector for Campbell on the month. Gains in energy trading and metals were dampened by losses in grains and soft commodities. While the energy complex made new highs for the year, primarily on the Chinese inflation story, cotton prices fell 26% from the mid-November high. It seems to be all about China these days as they attempt to dampen growth for fear of inflation. Equity trading was marginally positive despite mixed performance around the globe. While major U.S. indices finished slightly lower on the month, Japan’s Nikkei was up 8%, primarily driven by the weakening Yen. Global Central Bank intervention has made trading based solely on macroeconomic measures difficult. The Trust’s models have naturally tilted to technical indicators until the value of fundamental information is once again relevant to asset prices.

          The appetite for risk-based assets was clearly back in vogue during the month of December. Commodities were the strongest performing sector during the month for the Trust as the rally in energies, metals, soft commodities and grain markets continued. The petroleum and industrial metal complexes closed December near the year’s highs on steady demand and a healthy global economic picture. Cotton rallied over 25% during the month to finish up over 90% on the year. Additional gains were recorded in stock index trading as global equity markets staged a strong rally during the month on better than expected economic data, including strong consumer spending during the 2010 holiday season, and increased M&A activity. Despite signs of a stronger economy and higher interest rates, the U.S. Dollar weakened against all major currencies in December, fueling gains for the Trust in the currency sector. Commodity-linked currencies, in particular, enjoyed a strong rally with the Australian Dollar reaching its strongest level since 1982. Despite its strong year-to-date performance, Fixed Income was the only losing sector for the Trust in December, as economic conditions improved and Central Bank policies across the globe remained unchanged.

2009

          Of the (6.34)% return for year ended 2009 for Series A, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.85% due to brokerage fees, management fees, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A offset by approximately 0.22% due to investment income.

          Of the (5.86)% return for year ended 2009 for Series B, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.27% due to brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B offset by approximately 0.12% due to investment income.

          Of the (6.41)% return for Series W for the period March 1, 2009 (commencement of trading) through December 31, 2009, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.93% was due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and offering costs borne by Series W offset by approximately 0.23% due to investment income.

          An analysis of the (1.71)% gross trading losses for the Trust for the year by sector is as follows:

Sector		% Gain (Loss)
Currencies			3.74	%
Commodities			(0.21	)
Stock Indices			(0.47	)
Interest Rates			(4.77	)
			(1.71)	%

          President Obama’s stimulus plan took center stage in January; however, weak economic data continued to negatively impact global stock markets into the start of the New Year. An early month rally fizzled quickly, causing notable declines in major global indices. The Trust gained in equity indices trading on net short positions across each region. Gains were recorded in fixed income trading as the world’s central banks continued to lower interest rates. Mounting fiscal deficits and huge issuance needs begin to weigh heavy on the long-end; however, credit markets generally improved in January with yield spreads continuing to contract. Foreign exchange trading finished slightly negative on the month. Risk aversion and capital preservation benefited the Trust’s net long U.S. Dollar position; however, the U.K. government’s unprecedented move to give the Bank of England power to increase their stake in Royal Bank of Scotland to 70% helped fuel a late month rally in the British Pound, eliminating gains from a previous decline. Commodity trading was generally flat on volatility across precious and base metals and a slowing of the negative energy trend.

          In February, the U.S. government’s ability to address the economic crisis was met with skepticism by Wall Street. Economic data remained persistently weak, especially on the employment and housing fronts. The U.S. was not alone in reporting negative news, as European and Asian economies also continued with the release of dismal economic data such as declining exports and falling dividends. The majority of February gains in the Trust resulted from equity indices trading, particularly from short positions in the U.S. and Asia. Additional gains were recorded in foreign exchange trading as investors continued to feed U.S. Dollar strength, particularly relative to the Japanese Yen. The U.S. Dollar continues to be the safe haven pick as the risk aversion theme continued, as evidenced by the U.S. treasury yields recording all-time lows.

          Stock markets rallied in March as the 2008 fourth quarter earnings announcements subsided and large U.S. banks announced they would be profitable for the first two months of 2009. The majority of the Trust’s losses in March resulted from equity indices trading, as the equity rally adversely impacted net short positions globally. Commodities recorded losses as energy price swings have become correlated with equities and metals surged on news of China’s economic stimulus plan. Gains from fixed income markets were recorded from the Trust’s long global bond positions as prices moved significantly higher on announcements from the Swiss, British and American Central Banks on their intentions of adding liquidity by purchasing medium to long-term bonds in the market. Foreign exchange trading resulted in gains as investors sought currencies whose home central banks were not keen on engaging in quantitative easing.

          While equity index trading produced the most profitable sector results for the Trust for 2008, the Trust’s net exposure on the short side of global stock indices through April 2009 has hurt performance as markets continued to stage rallies that began in mid-March. U.S. economic indicators, including housing and manufacturing, showed signs of improvement and stabilization rather than further deterioration. In addition, the G-20 agreed to trust more than $1 trillion in emergency aid to help cushion the economic fallout of the current international financial crisis. While the general tone of the economic outlook was more upbeat, officials have still been cautious in their assessment. April saw a continuation of the March risk-seeking rally leading to several growth currencies registering solid gains against the dollar. Losses were realized in the foreign exchange sector due to the Trust’s general bias to be long in the dollar against most major currencies. In fixed income, the equity market rally helped general investor sentiment, driving bond prices lower across the board which produced losses for the Trust in this sector. Commodity trading finished relatively flat with gains from the energy sector offsetting small losses in base and precious metals.

          In May, conflicting signals on global recovery weighed on the direction of the markets as increased risk appetite and signs of stabilization in the global economy emerged. Equity markets continued their rally, particularly in Asia, generating small gains in the stock index sector. Fixed income trading generated a marginal positive return as short-term rates in Europe climbed higher following the European Central Bank rate cut of 25 basis points. The gains in the stock index and fixed income sectors were offset by losses in the foreign exchange sector. The U.S. Dollar suffered a broad based decline in May on a combination of stronger risk appetite and growing fears over structural deficiencies in the U.S. Investors moved dormant dollar denominated assets overseas to capture growth and risk in commodity block currencies. Smaller losses were also recorded in the commodities sector as natural gas finished a volatile month higher.

          During June, a surprise payroll number to the upside for May prompted an aggressive sell-off in short-term U.S. rates and raised market expectations of a rate hike in 2009. The price reaction was swift and caused particular difficulty for systematic trading. Losses for the Trust in the fixed income sector were offset by marginal gains in the foreign exchange sector. The Trust’s currency positions were generally mixed, thus hedging some U.S. Dollar risk, as investors crowded the Dollar as a safe-haven trade, pushing it higher on the month. Marginal gains were also recorded in the commodities sector, primarily from long positions in the energy complex. As geo-political headlines were plentiful, energies traded in a highly correlated fashion to global equity markets. The stock index sector finished basically flat for the month as global equity markets reflected mixed results congruent with both positive and negative economic data relating to global recovery.

          Contrary to investor fears, global stock market returns in 2009 have fueled improved risk appetite as economic data and corporate earnings support the rally for yet another month in July. The Trust’s trading performance was relatively flat, with positive results from long stock and short U.S. Dollar positions being offset by losses incurred from short interest rate positions. For the first half of 2009, many “trend-following” strategies struggled to curb losses and eked out small gains in a market environment that is in a classic “consolidation” (trendless and choppy) period.

          While risk appetite was generally strong in August, investors’ risk behavior was a bit random as fixed income initially sold off on better than expected payroll data, but spent the rest of the month rallying. Bernanke’s nomination for a second term and continued “lower rates for longer” comments from Fed officials helped support Treasury prices against the Trust’s general positioning across the curve. Smaller losses were recorded in currency trading as investors appeared unwilling to chase growth currencies higher, at the expense of the dollar, from already stretched levels. Gains were recorded in commodity markets as the Trust increased its exposure to this sector with the launch of more agile models providing more efficient holding period diversification. Trading in base and precious metals was a primary driver as the “risk on” trade prevailed on improving economic data. Equity indices trading yielded a marginal gain as positioning geographically and across model groups remains mixed.

          During the month of September, the Trust’s technical and fundamental strategies both recorded healthy gains in the foreign exchange sector from short positions in the U.S. Dollar vs. most major currencies. Commodity-linked currencies were particularly profitable for the Trust, as both the Australian and New Zealand Dollars rose in value close to 5%. Technical and fundamental signals were also effective in the equity index sector, where the Trust benefited from primarily long positions across global stock indices. With the exception of Japan, global equities moved higher by 2 — 3% during the month on healthy M&A activity, as well as favorable signs of a manufacturing rebound and consumer spending renewal. Results were mixed in fixed income trading as gains earned from short-term rates were largely offset by losses on the long end of the curve. Commodities trading resulted in marginal losses overall, primarily due to short positions in natural gas. The price of natural gas rallied over 20% during the month as a result of significant short covering in the market despite record storage levels.

          The risk pendulum continued to swing between “risk on” and “risk off” during the month of October, culminating in “risk off” at month-end and impacting all sectors of the portfolio. As global equity markets fell, commodities fell in tandem and the U.S. Dollar rallied along with fixed income in a thematic trade tied to central bank activity. While the Trust’s risk exposure to equity indices was relatively low, our net long position yielded the largest sector loss during the month. The high volatility environment for mean-reversion equity trading was quite favorable, resulting in gains in the cash equities statistical models in both U.S. and Japan. The perseverance of the “risk off” trade at month-end resulted in modest losses in foreign exchange, modest gains in commodities.

          November saw strong trends generate a return of 3.03%, with solid gains in interest rates, foreign exchange, and commodities. Weaker than expected new home sales to start the month, the Federal Open Market Committee’s retention of “extended period” language at mid-month, and a flight to quality at month-end fueled by fears over Dubai debt pushed bond prices higher throughout the month. Thus, trading in fixed income contributed to strong gains from both the short and long end of the curve; foreign exchange trading profited from a continued downward trend of the U.S. Dollar; and commodity trading benefitted from gains in precious metals.

          In December, the markets saw a rapid reversal in fixed income and the U.S. Dollar. Inflationary fears subsided as better than expected U.S. economic data fueled equity prices higher and bond prices lower. While market participants seemed to be trading at reduced risk levels, price trends were inconsistent leading into the holiday break, causing losses for many systematic managers, including Campbell. Sharp losses in fixed income trading and modest losses in foreign exchange outweighed solid gains in cash equities and equity indices trading, resulting in a net loss for the month.

2008

          Of the decrease of 1.38% for Series A for the period October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009, approximately 0.27% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 1.15% was due to brokerage fees, management fees, and offering costs borne by Series A offset by approximately 0.04% due to interest income.

          Of the 2008 year-to-date increase of 1.25% for Series B, approximately 3.82% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.68% due to interest income offset by approximately 4.25% due to brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B.

          An analysis of the 3.82% gross trading gains for the Trust for the year by sector is as follows:

Sector		% Gain (Loss)
Stock Indices			8.68	%
Commodities			0.43
Currencies			(0.60	)
Interest Rates			(4.69	)
			3.82	%

          The first quarter of 2008 began where 2007 left off, with the credit crisis causing more write-downs, more credit downgrades, and a growing realization that sub-prime issues would have broader and longer-lasting impacts than initially suspected. In January, weak economic data caused the Federal Open Market Committee to cut short-term rates by a total of 1.25%, which included an unprecedented 0.75% emergency cut. The S&P 500 recorded one of its worst monthly performances in the history of the index. The Trust’s performance in January was a small loss, with gains in equity indices trading more than offset by losses in currencies and flat performance in fixed income and commodities.

          February saw the U.S. dollar weaken against most major currencies, as U.S. economic data disappointed, stagflation concerns grew and U.S. interest rate expectations declined dramatically. The Trust’s currency trading profited from these moves, generating a positive return for the month. The Trust also recorded gains in equity indices trading, as the S&P 500, Dow, and NASDAQ continued to slide. Overall, the Trust had a positive month.

          March brought more Federal Reserve intervention, which resulted in a slight recovery by U.S. stocks from mid-month slides to finish flat for the month, but still significantly negative for the year. The US dollar continued to weaken. The Trust’s performance was close to flat for the month at (0.23)%, with gains in equity indices and currencies offset by losses in commodities and fixed income. The Trust closed the first quarter of 2008 with a year-to-date small gain.

          In April, the U.S. Dollar rallied against key funding currencies, despite a generally weak global economy. The Trust realized gains in foreign exchange and commodities. However, those gains were overshadowed by losses in the fixed income and equity indices sectors, as prior trends in both sectors reversed course. For the month of April, the Trust suffered a loss.

          May was a strong month for the Trust. Positive commodity trading led the charge as crude oil breached new technical levels, touching $135 mid-month. Foreign exchange models also posted gains, as high-yielding currencies performed well. These gains, together with modest gains in the fixed income sector more than offset a loss in equity indices. The Trust achieved a positive return on the month.

          In June the Trust realized its best month of the year. Equity indices trading produced strong gains as short positions benefitted from the negative news that roiled the markets around the globe. Signs of commodity-based inflation were constantly in the headlines. Consumer confidence fell to a 16-year low, as U.S., European, and Asian equities markets fell in tandem. Fixed income trading produced additional gains for the Trust, in response to fears of inflation and the ECB’s increasingly hawkish stance. Commodities also posted gains as crude oil hit new highs on the back of increased tensions in the Middle East and among OPEC members. In addition, the Trust had modest gains in foreign exchange sector. The Trust concluded the second quarter with a gain of 4.43% for the quarter, and a year-to-date gain of 5.19%.

          The month of July was characterized by reversals in many asset classes. The Dow and S&P hit technical bear market territory early in the month, while Japanese equities saw their longest back-to-back losing streak in 54 years. Equity markets seemed to find a bottom mid-month after the U.S. announced the Government-Sponsored Enterprises bailout plan. Commodity prices also reversed, with crude oil declining almost 12% on fears that a weakened economy would reduce global demand. The Trust earned profits in equity indices trading. Those gains were offset by losses in fixed income and commodities. All-in, the Trust finished the month with a loss.

          In August, sub-prime fallout continued to plague the global financial markets. The U.S. unemployment rate hit a four-year high. Commodity prices continued to decline, with natural gas leading the way with a decline of 12.75% and gold falling to its lowest level in eight months. The Trust experienced losses in foreign exchange and commodities sectors as currencies linked to commodities fell in tandem with metal and energy markets, while the U.S. Dollar Index posted unusually strong gains. Those losses edged out gains in fixed income, resulting in a loss for the month.

          September saw concern over the widening credit crises come to a boiling point. Equity markets in the U.S., Europe, and Asia declined sharply. Investors fled high-yielding currencies in response to the global decline in equity markets. The Trust posted a loss of 1.37%. Gains in equity indices were offset by losses in foreign exchange, fixed income, and commodities. Diversification of positions by sector and geography played an important role in dampening losses to the Trust, as did a decrease in risk levels across the portfolio. The Trust concluded the third quarter with a loss for the quarter.

          At the time, the month of October seemed like a month to remember, as equity markets around the world plummeted, fueling further anxiety about the length and depth of a global recession and further exacerbating the liquidity, growth, and confidence crisis. With the benefit of hindsight, it was but the beginning of a quarter to remember. For the Trust, the month was about the benefits and disadvantages of diversification. Modest gains in equity indices trading were more than offset by losses in foreign exchange and fixed income, resulting in a loss for the month.

          November brought further global economic panic, as governments around the world continued to announce plans to help bolster sagging economies. The U.S. reversed course on its bailout effort, from buying troubled assets to facilitating lending flow. Economic data reflected another sharp drop in manufacturing, rising unemployment, and the largest drop in retail sales since 1992, prompting wild swings in both equity and bond markets. The Trust maintained a relatively low risk profile during the month, which resulted in marginal losses and gains across the sectors. For the Trust, losses in fixed income offset marginal gains in other sectors, resulting in a loss for the month.

          December saw more of the same on the global economic front. The Trust, however, took advantage of dramatic moves in the British Pound, particularly against the Euro, to achieve gains in foreign exchange. Likewise, fixed income trading was profitable as central banks across the globe continued to lower interest rates on persistent negative data. Overall, the Trust had a gain for December.

Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Introduction

Past Results Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance

          The Trust is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Trust’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Trust’s main line of business.

          Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Trust’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Trust’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Trust’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

          The Trust rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Trust’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Standard of Materiality

          Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, and multiplier features of the Trust’s market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Trust’s Trading Value at Risk

Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements

          The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Trust’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact (such as the dollar amount of maintenance margin required for market risk sensitive instruments held at the end of the reporting period).

          The Trust’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded is estimated in terms of Value at Risk (VaR). The Trust estimates VaR using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 97.5%) which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear exposures to risks, including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices or other market factors to which the portfolio is sensitive. The Trust’s VaR at a one day 97.5% confidence level corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 40 trading days or one day in 40. VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome.

          The Trust uses approximately one quarter of daily market data and revalues its portfolio for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily “simulated profit and loss” outcomes. The VaR is the 2.5 percentile of this distribution.

          The VaR for a sector represents the one day downside risk for the aggregate exposures associated with this sector. The current methodology used to calculate the aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Trust’s open positions across all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes.

          The Trust’s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and does not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. It is also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements.

          VaR models, including the Trust’s, are continually evolving as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by the Trust in its daily risk management activities. Please further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities.

          Because the business of the Trust is the speculative trading of futures, forwards and options, the composition of the Trust’s trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading day, which could positively or negatively materially impact market risk as measured by VaR.

The Trust’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

          The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Trust’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and the trading gains/losses by market category for the years then ended.

		December 31, 2010
Market Sector		Value at Risk*				Gain/(Loss)**
Commodities			0.83	%			3.21	%
Stock Indices			0.48	%			(2.54)	%
Currencies			0.46	%			2.94	%
Interest Rates			0.45	%			12.12	%
Aggregate/Total			1.72	%			15.73	%

Of the 10.61% return for year ended 2010 for Series A, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.43% due to investment income, offset by approximately 5.55% due to brokerage fees, management fees, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

Of the 11.63% return for year ended 2010 for Series B, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.40% due to investment income, offset by approximately 4.50% due to brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B.

Of the 11.65% return for year ended 2010 for Series W, approximately 15.73% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.43% due to investment income, offset by approximately 4.51% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and offering costs borne by Series W.

		December 31, 2009
Market Sector		Value at Risk*				Gain/(Loss)**
Currencies			0.90	%			3.74	%
Interest Rates			0.68	%			(4.77)	%
Stock Indices			0.45	%			(0.47	)%
Commodities			0.41	%			(0.21	)%
Aggregate/Total			1.62	%			(1.71)	%

Of the (6.34)% return for year ended 2009 for Series A, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.85% was due to brokerage fees, management fees, and offering costs borne by Series A offset by approximately 0.22% due to investment income.

Of the (5.86)% return for year ended 2009 for Series B, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.27% due to brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B offset by approximately 0.12% due to investment income.

Of the (6.41)% return for Series W for the period March 1, 2009 (commencement of trading) through December 31, 2009, approximately 1.71% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 4.93% was due to brokerage fees, management fees, Sales commissions and offering costs borne by Series W offset by approximately 0.23% due to investment income.

		December 31, 2008
						Trading
Market Sector		Value at Risk*				Gain/(Loss)**
Currencies			0.50	%			(0.60	)%
Interest Rates			0.29	%			(4.69)	%
Stock Indices			0.17	%			8.68	%
Commodities			0.06	%			0.43	%
Aggregate/Total			0.59	%			3.82	%

Of the return for the period October 1, 2008 (commencement of trading) to December 31, 2008 for Series A, approximately 0.27% was due to trading losses (before commissions) and approximately 1.15% was due to brokerage fees, management fees, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A offset by interest income of approximately 0.04% giving a net return of (1.38)%.

Of the return for the year ended December 31, 2008 for Series B, approximately 3.82% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.68% was due to interest income offset by approximately 4.25% in brokerage fees, management fees and operating costs borne by Series B giving a net return of 1.25%.

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The following limitations of VaR as an assessment of market risk should be noted:

1)		Past changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market movements;
2)		Changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the VaR model;
3)		VaR results reflect past trading positions while future risk depends on future positions;
4)		VaR using a one day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and
5)		The historical market risk factor data for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements.

VaR is not necessarily representative of historic risk nor should it be used to predict the Trust’s future financial performance or its ability to manage and monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Trust’s actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated or that such losses will not occur more than once in 40 trading days.

Non-Trading Risk

The Trust has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are immaterial. The Trust also has non-trading market risk as a result of investing a substantial portion of its available assets in U.S. Treasury Bills held at the broker and over-the-counter counterparty. The market risk represented by these investments is minimal. Finally, the Trust has non-trading market risk on fixed income securities held as part of its cash management program. The cash managers will use their best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Trust but provide no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Trust as a result of such management.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

          The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Trust’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Trust manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Trust’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by Campbell & Company for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Trust’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Trust. There can be no assurance that the Trust’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Trust.

          The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Trust as of December 31, 2010, by market sector.

Currencies

          Exchange rate risk is the principal market exposure of the Trust. The Trust’s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The Trust trades in a large number of currencies, including cross-rates — i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Campbell & Company does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Trust’s currency sector will change significantly in the future.

Interest Rates

          Interest rate risk is a significant market exposure of the Trust. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond positions held by the Trust and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Trust’s profitability. The Trust’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and the other G-7 countries. Campbell & Company anticipates that G-7 interest rates will remain the primary market exposure of the Trust for the foreseeable future. The changes in interest rates which have the most effect on the Trust are changes in long-term, as opposed to short-term rates. Changes in the interest rate environment will have the most impact on longer dated fixed income positions, at points of time throughout the year. The majority of the speculative positions held by the Trust may be held in medium to long-term fixed income positions.

Stock Indices

          The Trust’s primary equity exposure is to equity price risk in the G-7 countries and several other countries (Hong Kong, Spain, Taiwan and Netherlands). The stock index futures traded by the Trust are limited to futures on broadly based indices. The Trust is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. Markets that trade in a narrow range could result in the Trust’s positions being “whipsawed” into numerous small losses.

Energy

          The Trust’s primary energy market exposure is to natural gas, crude oil and derivative product price movements often resulting from international political developments and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the perceived outcome. Oil and gas prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

Metals

          The Trust’s metals market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of aluminum, copper, gold, nickel, platinum, silver, and zinc.

Agricultural

     The Trust’s agricultural exposure is to fluctuations of the price of wheat, corn, coffee, cocoa, sugar, soy, hogs, cattle, canola, and cotton.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

          The following were the non-trading risk exposures of the Trust as of December 31, 2010.

Foreign Currency Balances

          The Trust’s primary foreign currency balances are in Australian Dollar, Japanese Yen, British Pounds and Euros. The Trust controls the non-trading risk of these balances by regularly converting these balances back into dollars (no less frequently than twice per month, and more frequently if a particular foreign currency balance becomes unusually large).

Fixed Income Securities

          The Trust’s primary market exposure in instruments (other than treasury positions described in the subsequent section) held other than for trading is in its fixed income portfolio. The cash managers, Wilmington and Horizon, have authority to make certain investments on behalf of the Trust. All securities purchased by the cash managers on behalf of the Trust will be held in the Trust’s custody account at the custodian. The cash managers will use their best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Trust but provide no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Trust as a result of such management.

Treasury Bill Positions for Margin Purposes

          The Trust also has market exposure in its Treasury Bill portfolio. The Trust holds Treasury Bills (interest bearing and credit risk-free) with maturities no longer than six months. Violent fluctuations in prevailing interest rates could cause minimal mark-to-market losses on the Trust’s Treasury Bills, although substantially all of these short-term investments are held to maturity.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

          The means by which the Trust and Campbell & Company, severally, attempt to manage the risk of the Trust’s open positions is essentially the same in all market categories traded. Campbell & Company applies risk management policies to its trading which generally limit the total exposure that may be taken per “risk unit” of assets under management. In addition, Campbell & Company follows diversification guidelines (often formulated in terms of the balanced volatility between markets and correlated groups), as well as precalculating “stop-loss” points at which systems will signal to close out open positions.

     Campbell & Company manages the risk of the Trust’s non-trading instruments of Treasury Bills held for margin purposes by limiting the duration of such instruments to no more than six months. Campbell & Company manages the risk of the Trust’s fixed income securities held for cash management purposes by restricting the cash managers to investing in securities that are modeled after those investments allowed by the futures broker as defined under The Commodity Exchange Act, Title 17, Part 1, § 1.25 Investment of customer funds. Investments can include, but are not limited to, (i) U.S. Government Securities, Government Agency Securities, Municipal Securities, banker acceptances and certificates of deposits; (ii) commercial paper; and (iii) corporate debt.

General

          The Trust is unaware of any (i) anticipated known demands, commitments or capital expenditures; (ii) material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources; or (iii) trends or uncertainties that will have a material effect on operations. From time to time, certain regulatory agencies have proposed increased margin requirements on futures contracts. Because the Trust generally will use a small percentage of assets as margin, the Trust does not believe that any increase in margin requirements, as proposed, will have a material effect on the Trust’s operations.

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

          Financial statements meeting the requirements of Regulation S-X appear beginning on Page 44 of this report. The supplementary financial information specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is included in Item 6 — Selected Financial Data.

Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

		None.

Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures

          Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator of the Trust, with the participation of the managing operator’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) with respect to the Trust as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on their evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in the managing operator’s internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Trust identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the last fiscal quarterly that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Trust.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

          Campbell & Company, Inc. (“CCI”), the managing operator of the Trust, is responsible for the management of the Trust. Management of CCI (“Management”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Trust’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

	•		Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Trust;
	•		Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the partnership’s transactions are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and;
	•		Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Trust’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

     Management assessed the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, Management used the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Item 9B.		Other Information

          There was no information required to be disclosed in a report on form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2010.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

          The Registrant has no directors or executive officers. The Registrant has no employees. It is managed by Campbell & Company in its capacity as managing operator. Campbell & Company has been registered as a commodity pool operator (CPO) since September 1982. Its main business address is 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland, 21209, (410) 413-2600. Campbell & Company’s directors and executive officers are as follows:

          G. William Andrews, born in 1972, has been employed by Campbell & Company since April 1997 and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in January 2010, was Vice President: Director of Operations from April 2007 to January 2010, and was Vice President: Director of Research Operations from March 2006 to April 2007 and Research Assistant from March 2005 to February 2006. As Chief Operating Officer, he is involved in all operational aspects of the firm. In March 2010, Mr. Andrews was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee, and in that capacity is responsible for the management of the research and investment process at the firm. In March 2010, Mr. Andrews was appointed the Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of both Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC registered investment adviser, and The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company. Mr. Andrews holds an M.B.A. in Finance from Loyola College in Maryland and a Bachelor of Social Science from Waikato University, New Zealand. Mr. Andrews became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company effective June 21, 2006. Mr. Andrews became listed as Principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective March 29, 2010.

          Theresa D. Becks, born in 1963, joined Campbell & Company in June 1991 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2007, Secretary since May 1992, Director since January 1994, and was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer until July 2008. Since April 2007, Ms. Becks has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser; she previously served as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary commencing December 2005. Ms. Becks has served since April 2007 as Trustee, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company; she previously served as Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary commencing June 2005. In May 2010, Ms. Becks was incorporated in The Bahamas. Ms. Becks served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Managed Funds Association from November 2002 to November 2006. Ms. Becks is a C.P.A. and has a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Delaware. Ms. Becks became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective May 7, 1999, March 10, 1993 and April 21, 1999, respectively. Ms. Becks became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective December 14, 2005, December 12, 2005 and December 14, 2005, respectively.

          D. Keith Campbell, born in 1942, has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company since it began operations in 1972, was President until January 1994, and was Chief Executive Officer until January 1998. Mr. Campbell is the majority voting stockholder of Campbell & Company. Mr. Campbell has acted as a commodity trading advisor since January 1972 when, as general partner of the Campbell Fund, a limited partnership engaged in commodity futures trading, he assumed sole responsibility for trading decisions made on its behalf. Since then, he has applied various technical trading models to numerous discretionary futures trading accounts. Mr. Campbell is registered with the CFTC and NFA as a commodity pool operator. Mr. Campbell became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective October 29, 1997, September 29, 1978 and September 29, 1997, respectively. Mr. Campbell became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective July 9, 2008. Mr. Campbell became listed as a Principal of his Commodity Pool Operator effective March 10, 1975.

          Bruce L. Cleland, born in 1947, joined Campbell & Company in January 1993 and has served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company since April 2007, was President from January 1994 to April 2007, and Chief Executive Officer from January 1998 to April 2007. From December 2005 until April 2007, Mr. Cleland was also the President and Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment advisor. From June 2005 until April 2007, Mr. Cleland also served as Trustee, Chief Executive Officer and President of The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company. In March 2010, Mr. Cleland was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee, and in that capacity is responsible for the management of the research and investment process at the firm. Mr. Cleland is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the National Futures Association, and previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Managed Futures Association and as a member of the Board of Governors of the COMEX, in New York. Mr. Cleland is a graduate of Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand where he earned a Bachelor of Commerce and Administration degree. Mr. Cleland again became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective December 15, 1993, September 15, 1993 and December 15, 1993, respectively. Mr. Cleland was an Associated Person, Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC from December 2005 to April 2007. Effective July 9, 2008, Mr. Cleland again became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC.

          Gregory T. Donovan, born in 1972, joined Campbell & Company in October 2006 and has served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Campbell & Company since July 2008, and was Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance from October 2006 to July 2008. His duties include oversight of accounting and finance functions and review of accounting policies and procedures. Mr. Donovan is also, since April 2007, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of both Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment advisor, and The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company, and since May 2010 as Treasurer of Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited, an international business company incorporated in The Bahamas. From November 2003 to October 2006, Mr. Donovan was employed by Huron Consulting Services, a managing consulting firm, serving as Director in the Financial and Economic Consulting Practice. Mr. Donovan is a C.P.A. and has a B.S. in Business Administration with concentrations in Accounting and Management from Castleton State College and holds a M.S. in Finance from the University of Baltimore. Mr. Donovan became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective July 5, 2007, May 9, 2007 and July 2, 2007, respectively. Mr. Donovan became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective May 16, 2007.

          Michael S. Harris, born in 1975, has been employed by Campbell & Company since July 2000, was appointed Deputy Manager of Trading in September 2004 and has served as Vice President and Director of Trading since June 2006. His duties include managing daily trade execution for the assets under Campbell & Company’s management. In March 2010, Mr. Harris was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee, and in that capacity is responsible for the management of the investment process of the firm. Mr. Harris holds a B.A. in Economics and Japanese Studies from Gettysburg College. He also spent time studying abroad at Kansai Gaidai University in Osaka, Japan. Mr. Harris became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective September 21, 2000, June 15, 2006 and August 19, 2000, respectively.

          Xiaohua Hu, born in 1963, joined Campbell & Company in April 1994 and was appointed Research Director in March 2010. Since he joined the firm, Mr. Hu has had a major role in the ongoing research and development of Campbell & Company’s trading systems. In March 2010, Mr. Hu was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee, and in that capacity is responsible for the management of the research and investment process at the firm. Mr. Hu holds a B.A. in Manufacturing Engineering from Changsha University of Technology in China. He went on to receive an M.A. and Ph.D. in Systems and Information Engineering from the Toyohashi University of Technology, in Japan. During his studies at Toyohashi, Mr. Hu was also a Visiting Researcher in Computer Science and Operations Research and published several research papers. Mr. Hu was listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company from February 1998 to December 2001. Mr. Hu again became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company effective April 7, 2010.

     Thomas P. Lloyd, born in 1959, joined Campbell & Company in September 2005 as General Counsel and Executive Vice President-Legal and Compliance. In this capacity, he is involved in all aspects of legal affairs, compliance and regulatory oversight. Since April 2007, Mr. Lloyd has also overseen Campbell & Company’s fund administration function. Mr. Lloyd is also, since September 2005, the Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Treasurer of both Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor, and an SEC-registered investment adviser, and The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company, and since May 2010 as Secretary of Campbell & Company International Bahamas Limited, an international business company incorporated in The Bahamas. From July 1999 to September 2005, Mr. Lloyd was employed by Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (“DBSI”) in several positions, including Managing Director and head of the legal group for Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the Private Client Division of DBSI. Mr. Lloyd holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Maryland, and a J.D. from the University of Baltimore School of Law. Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Bars of the State of Maryland and the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Lloyd became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective August 30, 2010, October 20, 2005 and August 30, 2010, respectively. Mr. Lloyd became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective December 12, 2005.

     Robert W. McBride, born in 1970, has been employed by Campbell & Company since January 2004 and was appointed Director – Software Development and Research Operations in May 2010, was Director of Research Operations & Trade Operations from January 2010 to May 2010, Research Operations – Code Management Manager from March 2006 to January 2010, and Research Programmer from January 2004 to March 2006. Mr. McBride holds a M.S. in Computer Science from South Dakota Schools of Mines and Technology and a B.S. in Computer Science from Minnesota State University Mankato. Mr. McBride became listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company effective May 25, 2010.

     Tracy Wills-Zapata, born in 1971, joined Campbell & Company in February 2006 and has served as Managing Director – Business Development since January 2007 and was Managing Director of Institutional Business Development from February 2006 to January 2007. Ms. Wills-Zapata is also, since December 2008, Vice President of both Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser, and The Campbell Multi-Strategy Trust, a registered investment company. Prior to joining Campbell, Ms. Wills-Zapata was a Managing Director of DB Advisors LLC, and affiliates, from September 2002 to December 2005, where she was responsible for distribution of Deutsche Bank’s single manager hedge fund platform. Ms. Wills-Zapata was registered as an Associated Person from January 2005 to December 2005 with DB Capital Advisers Inc., and from February 2003 to January 2005 with DB Advisors LLC. Ms. Wills-Zapata was listed as a Principal with DB Advisors LLC from February 2003 to February 2004. Ms. Wills-Zapata was an NFA Associate Member from December 2004 to December 2005 with DB Capital Advisers Inc., and from January 2003 to January 2005 with DB Advisors LLC. Ms. Wills-Zapata is currently a member of the Board of Directors and a Member of the Executive Committee for the Managed Funds Association. Ms. Wills-Zapata became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company effective March 27, 2006, July 21, 2008 and March 27, 2006, respectively. Ms. Wills-Zapata became registered as an Associated Person and listed as a Principal and NFA Associate Member of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective February 18, 2009.

          There has never been a material administrative, civil or criminal action brought against Campbell & Company or any of its directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons.

          No Forms 3, 4, or 5 have been furnished to the Registrant since inception. To the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, no such forms have been or are required to be filed.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

          The Board of Directors of Campbell & Company, in its capacity as the audit committee for the Trust, has determined that Gregory T. Donovan qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. He is not independent of management.

Code of Ethics

          Campbell & Company has adopted a code of ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, director of fund accounting, accounting managers and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to Campbell & Company’s corporate secretary, 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21209 or by calling 1-800-698-7235.

Item 11.		Executive Compensation

          The Trust does not itself have any officers, directors or employees. The Trust pays management fees and performance fees to Campbell & Company. The directors and managing officers of Campbell & Company are remunerated by Campbell & Company in their respective positions. The directors and managing officers receive no “other compensation” from the Trust. There are no compensation plans or arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Trust or Campbell & Company.

          Campbell & Company receives from the Trust a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 4% of the month-end net assets of the Series A units and Series B units, totaling approximately 4% of the average month-end net assets per year of the Series A units and Series B units; a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 2% of the month-end net assets of the Series W units, totaling approximately 2% of average month-end net assets per year of the Series W units. The managing operator may pay a portion or all of its monthly management fee either upfront (with respect to Series A units) or on an ongoing basis with respect to Series B units (commencing with the 13^th month with respect to Series B units) to selected selling agents who have sold the Series A units and the Series B units, in return for their provision of ongoing services to the Series A and/or the Series B unitholders. It is intended that, in most cases, the ongoing payment paid to selling agents will be 2% per annum, paid monthly, on the then current net asset value of units sold by the selling agents, net of redemptions. In addition, Campbell & Company receives a quarterly performance fee of 20% of the aggregate cumulative appreciation (if any) in the net asset value per unit of the Series A units, Series B units and Series W units at the end of each quarter, exclusive of appreciation attributable to interest income. The performance fee is paid on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Net Asset Value per Unit over the highest previous cumulative Net Asset Value per Unit (commonly referred to as a “High Water Mark”). In determining the fees in this paragraph, adjustments shall be made for capital additions and withdrawals and Net Assets shall not be reduced by the fees being calculated for such current period. The performance fee is not subject to any clawback provisions. The brokerage fee and performance fee are typically paid in the month following the month in which they are earned. The brokerage fee and performance fee are paid from the available cash at the Fund’s bank, broker or cash management accounts.

Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

	(a)		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners. As of December 31, 2010, no Units of Beneficial Interest are owned or held by an officer of Campbell & Company.
	(b)		Security Ownership of Management. As of December 31, 2010, Campbell & Company owned 20.360 Units of Beneficial Interest in Series B having a value of $54,087. The amounts are summarized in the table below:

				Amount and Nature
		Name of		of Beneficial
Title of Class		Beneficial Owner		Ownership		Percentage of Class
Units of Beneficial Interest in Series B		Campbell & Company, Inc.		20.360 Units		0.02% of Units outstanding

Campbell & Company did not own any units of Series A and Series W at December 31, 2010.

Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

          See Item 11, Executive Compensation and Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

Item 14.		Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The principal accountant for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was Deloitte & Touche LLP.

	(a)		Audit Fees
			The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Trust’s annual financial statements, for review of financial statements included in the Trust’s Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $108,488 and $85,050, respectively.
	(b)		Audit Related Fees
			The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $0 and $11,830, respectively.
	(c)		Tax Fees
			None.
	(d)		All Other Fees
			None.
	(e)		The Board of Directors of Campbell & Company approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors has determined that the payments made to its independent accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors’ independence. The Board of Directors explicitly pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms.

PART IV

Item 15.		Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

The Following documents are filed as part of this report:

	(1)		See Financial Statements beginning on page 43 thereof.
	(2)		Schedules:
			Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not included in the financial statements or notes hereto applicable or because equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
	(3)		Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description of Document
1.01		Form of Selling Agreement among the Registrant, Campbell & Company and the Selling Agent. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
3.01		Articles and Plan of Merger of the Campbell Fund Limited Partnership with and into the Registrant dated January 2, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
3.02		Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of the Registrant dated January 2, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
3.03		Certificate of Trust of the Registrant dated January 2, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)

Exhibit Number		Description of Document
10.01		Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Campbell & Company. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
10.02		Customer Agreement between the Registrant, Campbell & Company and ABN AMRO Incorporated. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
10.03		Form of Subscription Agreement and Power of Attorney. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
10.04		International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement between the Registrant, Campbell & Company and ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., Chicago Branch. (Incorporated by reference to the respective exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 10 (No. 0-50264) filed on April 30, 2003.)
31.01		Certification of Theresa D. Becks, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securites Exchange Act of 1934.
31.02		Certification of Gregory T. Donovan, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securites Exchange Act of 1934.
32.01		Certification of Theresa D. Becks, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.02		Certification of Gregory T. Donovan, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	(b)		Reports on Form 8-K
			None.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 31, 2011.

		THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST
		By:		CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.
		Managing Operator
		By:		/s/ Theresa D. Becks
		Theresa D. Becks
		Chief Executive Officer and Director

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities of Campbell & Company, Inc., the Managing Operator of the Registrant, indicated on March 31, 2011.

Signature		Capacity
/s/ D. Keith Campbell
D. Keith Campbell		Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ Bruce L. Cleland
Bruce L. Cleland		Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ Theresa D. Becks
Theresa D. Becks		Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Gregory T. Donovan
Gregory T. Donovan		Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer

THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST

ANNUAL REPORT

December 31, 2010

THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST

INDEX

		PAGES
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP		46
Financial Statements
Condensed Schedules of Investments December 31, 2010 and 2009		47-52
Statements of Financial Condition December 31, 2010 and 2009		53
Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008		54-55
Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008		56
Statements of Changes in Unitholders’ Capital (Net Asset Value) For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008		57-58
Financial Highlights For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008		59-61
Notes to Financial Statements		62-70

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Unitholders of
The Campbell Fund Trust

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of The Campbell Fund Trust (the “Trust”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, cash flows, changes in unitholders’ capital (net asset value) and financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Campbell Fund Trust as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the results of its operations, its cash flows, changes in its unitholders’ capital (net asset value) and financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2011

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010

FIXED INCOME SECURITIES

Maturity										% of Net
Face Value				Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
				Certificate Of Deposit
				Canada
				Financials (cost $7,215,000)		$	7,221,421				2.08	%
				Commercial Paper
				Netherlands
				Industrials (cost $9,958,946)		$	9,987,542				2.88	%
				Panama
				Consumer Discretionary (cost $9,998,139)		$	9,998,275				2.89	%
				United Kingdom
				Consumer Staples (cost $5,716,634)		$	5,718,658				1.65	%
				United States
				Consumer Discretionary		$	41,051,450				11.85	%
				Consumer Staples		$	3,315,853				0.96	%
				Energy		$	17,387,305				5.02	%
				Financials		$	10,981,734				3.17	%
				Health Care		$	12,885,538				3.72	%
				Industrials		$	10,978,667				3.17	%
				Municipal		$	4,717,562				1.36	%
				Utilities		$	34,470,422				9.95	%
				Total United States (cost $135,762,709)		$	135,788,531				39.20	%
				Total Commercial Paper (cost $161,436,428)		$	161,493,006				46.62	%
				Corporate Bonds
				United States
				Financials (cost $37,464,778)		$	37,589,108				10.85	%
				Government And Agency Obligations
				United States
				US Government Agency		$	14,585,360				4.21	%
				US Treasury Bill
				U.S. Treasury Bills*
$	12,000,000			Due 01/06/2011		$	11,999,817				3.46	%

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010

Maturity										% of Net
Face Value				Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
				U.S. Treasury Bills*
$	50,000,000			Due 01/13/2011		$	49,998,833				14.43	%
				Total United States (cost $76,597,690)		$	76,584,010				22.10	%
				Short Term Investment Funds
				United States
				Short Term Investment Funds (cost $941)		$	941				0.00	%
				Total Fixed Income Securities (cost $282,714,837)		$	282,888,486				81.65	%

LONG FUTURES CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Agricultural		$	2,226,611				0.64	%
Energy		$	743,689				0.21	%
Metals		$	2,581,189				0.75	%
Stock indices		$	(39,120	)			(0.01	)%
Short-term interest rates		$	400,606				0.12	%
Long-term interest rates		$	45,692				0.01	%
Total long futures contracts		$	5,958,667				1.72	%

SHORT FUTURES CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Agricultural		$	(14,930	)			0.00	%
Energy		$	(239,450	)			(0.07	)%
Metals		$	(573,456	)			(0.17	)%
Stock indices		$	48,337				0.01	%
Short-term interest rates		$	(9,188	)			0.00	%
Long-term interest rates		$	(644,303	)			(0.19	)%
Total short futures contracts		$	(1,432,990	)			(0.42	)%
Total futures contracts		$	4,525,677				1.30	%

FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Various long forward currency contracts		$	26,630,262				7.69	%
Various short forward currency contracts		$	(21,482,235	)			(6.20	)%
Total forward currency contracts		$	5,148,027				1.49	%

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010

PURCHASED OPTIONS ON FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Purchased options on forward currency contracts (premiums paid — $1,091,379)		$	1,500,007				0.43	%

WRITTEN OPTIONS ON FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Written options on forward currency contracts (premiums received — $237,756)		$	(693,506	)			(0.20	)%

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2009

FIXED INCOME SECURITIES

Maturity										% of Net
Face Value				Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
				Bank Deposits
				United States
				Financials (cost $13,350,000)		$	13,357,610				3.66	%
				Commercial Paper
				Germany
				Materials (cost $7,142,188)		$	7,145,178				1.96	%
				Netherlands
				Consumer Discretionary (cost $10,878,552)		$	10,878,625				2.98	%
				United States
				Consumer Discretionary		$	41,353,531				11.32	%
				Consumer Staples		$	19,579,580				5.36	%
				Energy		$	11,644,613				3.19	%
				Financials		$	22,628,225				6.19	%
				Industrials
				Avery Dennison Corporation
$	30,060,000			Due 01/04/2010		$	30,058,964				8.23	%
				Municipal		$	76,574,854				20.96	%
				Telecommunications		$	14,985,483				4.10	%
				Total United States (cost $216,781,978)		$	216,825,250				59.35	%
				Total Commercial Paper (cost $234,802,718)		$	234,849,053				64.29	%
				Corporate Bonds
				United States
				Financials (cost $7,661,972)		$	7,680,054				2.10	%
				Government And Agency Obligations
				United States
				Financials
				US Government Agency		$	54,732,604				14.98	%
				U.S. Treasury Bills *
$	17,000,000			Due 03/25/2010		$	16,997,648				4.65	%
				Total United States (cost $71,704,748)		$	71,730,252				19.63	%

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2009

Maturity										% of Net
Face Value				Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
				Short Term Investment Funds
				United States
				Short Term Investment Funds (cost $3,061)		$	3,061				0.00	%
				Total Fixed Income Securities (cost $327,522,499)		$	327,620,030				89.68	%

LONG FUTURES CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Agricultural		$	(2,825	)			0.00	%
Energy		$	166,195				0.05	%
Metals		$	847,192				0.23	%
Stock indices		$	2,707,780				0.74	%
Short-term interest rates		$	(1,205,283	)			(0.33	)%
Long-term interest rates		$	(3,107,032	)			(0.85	)%
Total long futures contracts		$	(593,973	)			(0.16	)%

SHORT FUTURES CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Agricultural		$	12,863				0.00	%
Metals		$	(570,225	)			(0.16	)%
Long-term interest rates		$	119,654				0.03	%
Total short futures contracts		$	(437,708	)			(0.13	)%
Total futures contracts		$	(1,031,681	)			(0.29	)%

FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Various long forward currency contracts		$	(13,342,441	)			(3.65	)%
Various short forward currency contracts		$	10,265,262				2.81	%
Total forward currency contracts		$	(3,077,179	)			(0.84	)%

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Condensed Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2009

PURCHASED OPTIONS ON FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Purchased options on forward currency contracts (premiums paid — $847,190)		$	855,611				0.23	%

WRITTEN OPTIONS ON FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS

						% of Net
Description		Values ($)				Asset Value
Written options on forward currency contracts (premiums received — $264,078)		$	(230,427	)			(0.06	)%

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

The Campbell Fund Trust

Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2010 And 2009

		2010				2009
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts
Cash		$	43,929,635			$	18,882,546
Restricted cash			0				24,115,214
Fixed income securities (cost $49,998,833 and $0, respectively)			49,998,833				0
Net unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts			4,525,677				(1,031,681	)
Total equity in broker trading accounts			98,454,145				41,966,079
Cash and cash equivalents			15,906,463				8,129,710
Fixed income securities (cost $232,716,004 and $327,522,499, respectively)			232,889,653				327,620,030
Options purchased, at fair value (premiums paid — $1,091,379 and $847,190, respectively)			1,500,007				855,611
Net unrealized gain (loss) on open forward currency contracts			5,148,027				(3,077,179	)
Interest receivable			81,415				90,033
Subscriptions receivable			327,332				0
Total assets		$	354,307,042			$	375,584,284
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable		$	116,724			$	114,739
Management fee			1,142,475				1,229,415
Service fee			4,423				1,729
Options written, at fair value (premiums received — $237,756 and $264,078, respectively)			693,506				230,427
Accrued commissions and other trading fees on open contracts			47,113				41,418
Performance fee payable			381,483				0
Offering costs payable			32,432				10,230
Redemptions payable			5,439,258				8,638,173
Total liabilities			7,857,414				10,266,131
UNITHOLDERS’ CAPITAL (Net Asset Value)
Series A Units — Redeemable
Other Unitholders - 27,273.338 and 10,227.868 units outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			71,343,164				24,189,310
Series B Units — Redeemable
Managing Operator - 20.360 units outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			54,087				48,453
Other Unitholders - 99,342.853 and 141,411.145 units outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			263,905,408				336,529,754
Series W Units — Redeemable
Other Unitholders - 4,160.119 and 1,896.181 units outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			11,146,969				4,550,636
Total unitholders’ capital (Net Asset Value)			346,449,628				365,318,153
Total liabilities and unitholders’ capital (Net Asset Value)		$	354,307,042			$	375,584,284

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

Statements of Operations
For The Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 And 2008

		2010				2009				2008
TRADING GAINS (LOSSES)
Futures trading gains (losses)
Realized		$	33,286,029			$	(22,697,082	)		$	33,097,735
Change in unrealized			5,557,358				(1,008,960	)			(4,652,238	)
Brokerage commissions			(908,818	)			(585,700	)			(856,401	)
Net gain (loss) from futures trading			37,934,569				(24,291,742	)			27,589,096
Forward currency and options on forward currency trading gains (losses)
Realized			849,090				19,731,296				(19,095,861	)
Change in unrealized			8,136,012				(5,710,372	)			16,933,839
Brokerage commissions			(86,785	)			(70,270	)			(84,502	)
Net gain (loss) from forward currency and options on forward currency trading			8,898,317				13,950,654				(2,246,524	)
Total net trading gain (loss)			46,832,886				(10,341,088	)			25,342,572
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)
Investment income
Interest income			1,168,374				451,367				10,467,453
Realized gain (loss) on fixed income securities			89,402				(15,455	)			0
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on fixed income securities			76,118				97,531				0
Total investment income			1,333,894				533,443				10,467,453
Expenses
Management fee			13,137,518				16,971,300				25,405,845
Service fee			41,210				8,487				0
Performance fee			381,483				0				0
Operating expenses			449,559				297,133				193,586
Total expenses			14,009,770				17,276,920				25,599,431
Net investment income (loss)			(12,675,876	)			(16,743,477	)			(15,131,978	)
NET INCOME (LOSS)		$	34,157,010			$	(27,084,565	)		$	10,210,594
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER MANAGING OPERATOR AND OTHER UNITHOLDERS UNIT (1,2) (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the year)
Series A		$	390.52			$	(58.14	)		$	(32.19	)
Series B		$	218.49			$	(158.24	)		$	41.06
Series W		$	386.22			$	79.02				N/A