AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd	amreitmigiii111388_ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd	amreitmigiii111388_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd	amreitmigiii111388_ex31-2.htm
EX-10.17 - REAL ESTATE CONTRACT - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd	amreitmigiii111388_ex10-17.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd	amreitmigiii111388_ex31-1.htm

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549



Form 10-K


(Mark One)
x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number 000-52619

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD.
(Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Texas		20-2964630

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000
Houston, TX		77046

(address of principle executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (713) 850-1400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Limited Partnership Interests
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
	(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $70,800,000.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


ITEM			PAGE

		PART I
	1	BUSINESS	2
	1A	RISK FACTORS	14
	1B	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	14
	2	PROPERTIES	14
	3	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	21
	4	REMOVED AND RESERVED	21

		PART II
	5	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	21
	6	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	23
	7	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	23
	7A	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	31
	8	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	32
	9	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	32
	9A	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	32
	9B	OTHER INFORMATION	33

		PART III
	10	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	33
	11	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	34
	12	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	34
	13	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	34
	14	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	38

		PART IV
	15	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	39
		SIGNATURES	42

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), all references to “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, LTD. and its subsidiaries, including joint ventures.

Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “believe,” “potential,” “continue” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this Annual Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the SEC. We make no representation or warranty, express or implied, about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report.

- 1 -

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Background

We are a Texas limited partnership formed in April 2005 to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture arrangements, commercial real estate consisting primarily of single-tenant and multi-tenant retail properties. Our investment strategy has been to retain approximately 50% of our properties as income-producing assets during our projected six-year operating period, and opportunistically sell the remaining properties under attractive market conditions and reinvest the net sales proceeds into additional property investments. Our principal office is located at 8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046. Our telephone number is (713) 850-1400.

We commenced our principal operations on June 30, 2005, when we raised the minimum offering of $2.0 million pursuant to the terms of a private placement memorandum dated April 19, 2005, which we refer to as the Offering Memorandum or Offering, and issued our initial 80 limited partnership units, or Units. As of October 31, 2006, we had received approximately $71.1 million for the sale of 2,844 Units and closed the Offering. We refer to the holders of our Units as Limited Partners.

On April 30, 2007 we filed a Form 10-SB with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to register our Units pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We are subject to the registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act because the aggregate value of our assets exceeds applicable thresholds and the Units of record are held by 500 or more persons. As a result of our obligations to register our securities with the SEC under the Exchange Act, we are subject to the requirements of the Exchange Act rules, including the filing of this Annual Report.

Our general partner is AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, a Texas corporation and subsidiary of AmREIT, Inc. (“AmREIT”), an SEC reporting, non-traded Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust. We refer to AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation as the General Partner. AmREIT and its predecessors have sponsored and advised 18 partnerships formed for the purpose of investing in properties during their 27-year history. Our General Partner has the exclusive right to manage our business and affairs on a day-to-day basis pursuant to our limited partnership agreement, which we refer to as the Partnership Agreement. The Limited Partners have the right to remove and replace our General Partner, with or without cause, by a vote of the Limited Partners owning a majority of the outstanding Units (excluding any Units held by our General Partner). Our General Partner is responsible for all of our investment decisions, including decisions relating to the properties to be developed, the method and timing of financing or refinancing the properties, the selection of tenants, the terms of the leases, the method and timing of the sale of the properties and the reinvestment of net sales proceeds. Our General Partner utilizes the services of AmREIT and its affiliates in performing its duties under the Partnership Agreement. Our General Partner has invested $1,000 in us for its general partner interest and has invested $800,000 in us for Limited Partner Units. We refer to our General Partner and our Limited Partners collectively as the Partners.

We issued Units in the Offering in reliance upon exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and state securities laws. As a result, our Limited Partners may not transfer the Units except pursuant to an effective registration statement or pursuant to an exemption from registration. The Units are not currently listed on a securities exchange and there currently is no established public trading market for the Units. We do not intend to list the Units at this time and have no plans to list the Units on an exchange in the future.

As of December 31, 2010, our investments included three wholly-owned properties comprising approximately 225,000 square feet of gross leasable area, one property in which we own a controlling interest through a joint venture comprising approximately 102,000 square feet of gross leasable area and seven properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprising approximately 1,142,000 square feet of gross leasable area. A majority of our properties are located in highly populated, suburban communities in Texas.

- 2 -

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, these properties were 77% leased. We acquired all of these properties subsequent to our formation.

The following is a summary of the eleven properties in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2010:


Property	Location		Percent Owned			Square Footage		Occupancy			Annualized Base Rent (1)
Market at Lake Houston (4)		Houston		60	%		101,799		100	%	$	1,581,000
Lantern Lane		Houston		100			79,462		88			1,296,000
Olmos Creek		San Antonio		100			102,178		86			854,000
Westside Plaza		Houston		100			43,021		43			526,000
Berkeley Square (5)		Dallas		20			125,333		88			1,983,000
Casa Linda Plaza (5)		Dallas		50			324,569		72			3,293,000
Preston Park Gold (5)		Dallas		20			101,096		84			791,000
Preston Towne Crossing (5)		Dallas		20			169,844		78			2,598,000
Woodlake Pointe (2)(5)(6)		Houston		30			82,120		100			216,000
Woodlake Square (3)(5)		Houston		3			205,522		62			1,564,000
5433 Westheimer (5)(7)		Houston		58			133,881		63			1,465,000
Totals							1,468,825				$	16,167,000


(1)	Annualized base rent represents base rents in place on leases with rent having commenced as of December 31, 2010 and does not reflect straight-line rent or other adjustments required under generally accepted accounting principles.

(2)	Property is planned for redevelopment.

(3)	Property is currently under redevelopment.

(4)	Property is 60% owned through a joint venture and is consolidated in our financial statements and was sold subsequent to December 31, 2010.

(5)	Property is owned through a joint venture that is not consolidated in our financial statements.

(6)	As of December 31, 2010 this property was occupied by a tenant with a temporary lease.

(7)	Property represents a mixed-use investment that includes a hotel and an 11 story office building. The information provided in this table is related to the office building only.

	See “Item 2. Properties” for a more detailed description of our investments in properties.

Investment Objectives

Our investment objectives are:


	•	to preserve and protect our Limited Partners’ capital contributions;

	•	to provide cash distributions to our Partners through the operation of our properties; and

	•	to add value to our properties in which we have invested during our operating period and to realize appreciation upon the ultimate sale of such properties.

Investment Strategy

We were formed to acquire, develop and operate a portfolio of commercial real estate consisting primarily of multi-tenant shopping centers and mixed-use developments. We will seek to maximize our income and capital growth during our operating period by (1) selling approximately 50% of our properties when appropriate and reinvesting the net sales proceeds into additional properties (we refer to this process as Active Management), and (2) owning the remaining properties as income-producing assets during our entire operating period. Our operating period will continue until October 31, 2012. The operating period may be extended to October 31, 2014 with the consent of the majority of Units held by our Limited Partners. At the end of our operating period, the General Partner will begin an orderly liquidation of our properties and will distribute the net proceeds from liquidation to our Partners. If our General Partner does not diligently pursue the liquidation of our properties at the end of our operating period, it will forfeit its $800,000 investment in Units.

- 3 -

Table of Contents

Equity Allocation

As of December 31, 2010, we had invested substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering in real properties. We have invested approximately 75% of our capital in existing commercial shopping centers, primarily multi-tenant properties and mixed-use properties. Approximately 25% of our capital is invested in the development and redevelopment of commercial shopping centers, consisting primarily of multi-tenant and mixed-use developments. However, if our General Partner determines that the risk/return dynamic of the development investment activities or the acquisition of existing retail centers dramatically improves or declines, our capital will be reallocated accordingly.

Investments in Properties with Operating Histories

We have invested approximately 75% of our capital in existing shopping centers leased to high quality tenants, consisting primarily of multi-tenant centers and mixed-use properties. These investments are primarily shopping centers that are grocery-anchored, strip center, mixed-use or lifestyle properties whose tenants consist of national, regional and local retailers. Our grocery-anchored shopping centers are anchored by an established grocery store operator in the region. Our other shopping centers are typically leased to national and regional tenants, as well as a mix of local and value retailers. Our lifestyle centers are typically anchored by a combination of national and regional tenants that provide customer traffic and tenant draw for specialty and restaurant tenants that support the local consumer. We also own shopping centers that are leased to national drug stores, national restaurant chains, national value-oriented retail stores and other regional and local retailers.

The majority of our properties have leases that are either leased directly to or guaranteed by the lessee’s parent company, not just the operator of the individual location, and are in areas of substantial retail shopping traffic. Our strategy is to acquire properties that attract tenants that provide basic staples and convenience items to local customers. We believe that sales of these items are less sensitive to business cycle fluctuations than higher priced retail items.

Development and Redevelopment Properties

We have invested approximately 25% of our capital in development and redevelopment properties, either directly or indirectly through joint ventures. Of the eleven properties in which we currently own an interest, we have initiated plans to redevelop Woodlake Square and Woodlake Pointe. The amount of equity committed to development and redevelopment projects is generally between 25% and 100% of the total cost of the project, with the remaining costs being funded through lines of credit, construction financing or other property level mortgage financing. We work closely with local development partners in these transactions throughout the development process.

We are currently redeveloping Woodlake Square, and we plan to redevelop Woodlake Pointe. It is likely that these properties will become mixed-use developments which may include office, residential, entertainment and hospitality components. It is possible that our future investments will have mixed-use components as well. Our General Partner will analyze the market surrounding each mixed-use development to determine the optimal mix of retail to non-retail components. We seek to develop properties in locations that provide limited competition, quality demographics and strong market fundamentals. We intend to commence the leasing process before construction of a particular development property.

- 4 -

Table of Contents

Our General Partner may hire a general contractor to provide construction and construction management services for each of our development and redevelopment projects. The general contractor will be entitled to fees for providing these services, and these fees may be paid on a fixed price basis or a cost plus basis. AmREIT Construction Company, an affiliate of our General Partner, has historically provided construction and construction management services for many of our development and redevelopment projects. During 2008, AmREIT Construction Company ceased providing these services. We may engage in the future AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation (“ARIC”), also an affiliate of our General Partner, for construction management services. In these cases, such services will be provided on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than can be obtained from independent third parties for comparable services in the same location.

Each of our development and redevelopment projects has and will have a project manager assigned to ensure all necessary functions are performed. The project manager is responsible for coordinating all phases of the project, including the feasibility study of each project prior to the commencement of development and much of the pre-development work. Each development also has a construction manager who is responsible for coordinating all the outsourced trades including architectural, engineering, environmental and construction contractors. The construction manager will be an employee of ARIC in the event that ARIC is providing construction management services to a development project. The project and construction managers are jointly responsible for the preparation and adherence to the development budgets. Capital inflows and outflows are carefully tracked and compared against budgets. Actual cost versus budget reports are prepared on a monthly basis for review by various parties including the development team, management team and lenders. The project and construction managers work in unison to ensure each project is built within budget and on a timely basis.

We may place our capital in certain, at-risk situations to secure land our General Partner deems suitable for development. We will utilize methods such as purchase agreements and/or options to tie up development properties. Such commitments may not necessarily result in the eventual acquisition of a land site as we may elect to forfeit funds after completing our due diligence.

Location of Properties

We seek investments in properties located throughout the United States, with a primary focus on markets with increasing population growth and urban density. As a result of our General Partner’s experience in developing, acquiring and managing retail real estate in Texas metropolitan markets, each of the eleven properties in which we currently own an interest is located in Texas. The economies of the Texas metropolitan markets where we own investments will have a significant impact on our cash flow and the value of our properties. Although a downturn in the economies of these metropolitan areas could adversely affect our business, general retail and grocery anchored shopping centers that provide necessity-type items tend to be less sensitive to macroeconomic downturns.

Although we intend to invest only in properties in the United States, we are not prohibited from making investments in foreign countries that meet our investment criteria.

Investment Decisions

Our General Partner uses commercially reasonable efforts to present to us suitable investments consistent with our investment objectives and policies. In pursuing our investment objectives and making investment decisions for us, our General Partner considers relevant real estate property and financial factors, including the location of the property, its suitability for any development contemplated or in progress, its income-producing capacity, prospects for long-range appreciation, liquidity and tax considerations. Moreover, to the extent feasible, our General Partner strives to select a diversified portfolio of properties in terms of type of property and industry of the tenants, although the number and mix of properties acquired will largely depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time properties are acquired.

Prior to acquiring a property, our General Partner undertakes an extensive site review. Our General Partner typically undertakes a long-term viability and market value analysis, including an inspection of the property and surrounding area by an acquisition specialist and an assessment of market area demographics, consumer demand, traffic patterns, surrounding land use, accessibility, visibility, competition and parking. Our General Partner may also take additional actions to evaluate the property, including without limitation, the following:

- 5 -

Table of Contents


	•	obtaining an independent appraisal of the property;

	•	obtaining an independent engineering report of the property’s mechanical, electrical and structural integrity;

	•	conducting an investigation of title;

	•	evaluating both the current and potential alternative uses of the property; and

	•	obtaining an independent Phase I environmental site assessment.

Our General Partner is not required to obtain an appraisal in connection with an acquisition, although it is anticipated that, if third-party financing is being provided by a commercial lender, such lender will obtain an independent appraisal.

Real Estate Fundamentals

Our General Partner believes that sound real estate fundamentals will allow us to attract the best tenants and produce the best results for our real estate portfolio. Our General Partner believes that factors such as corner locations, high automobile traffic counts, high populations, high household incomes and limited opportunities for competition produce favorable conditions for the success of the tenant and the retail property. Corner locations traditionally offer favorable access because these locations can access traffic in all directions. High traffic passing a retail property provides maximum exposure for retail tenants. A high population base surrounding a retail property provides a large consumer base for a tenant’s business. Areas that have high household income have more disposable income that is less affected by economic cycles. Locations that have few opportunities for new retail properties offer a limited supply of space and thus have the best likelihood of growing rental rates. Although a shopping center seldom offers all of these factors, our General Partner will use these criteria to measure the quality and relative value of opportunities relative to others in evaluating each proposed real estate investment.

Our General Partner also believes that its ability to obtain locations near national commercial tenants such as Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Target, which are major traffic generators for other commercial tenants, should enable us to attract brand name, high quality tenants.

Tenant Quality and Monitoring

We seek to attract high quality tenants for our properties. A tenant will be considered “high quality” if, at the time of acquisition or leasing, the tenant has a regional or national presence, operating history of 10 or more years and a net worth in excess of $50 million. When available, our General Partner will rely on national credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s to assist in such determination. If public data is not available, our General Partner will rely on its experience, its own credit analysis and resources provided by its lenders to qualify a prospective tenant.

If a tenant has a public debt rating, we will seek tenants that have (i) a debt rating by Moody’s of Baa3 or better or a credit rating by Standard & Poor’s of BBB- or better or (ii) a guaranty for its payments under the lease by a guarantor with a debt rating by Moody’s of Baa3 or a credit rating by Standard & Poor’s of BBB- or better.

Moody’s ratings are opinions of future relative creditworthiness incorporating an evaluation of franchise value, financial statement analysis and management quality. The rating given to a debt obligation describes the level of risk associated with receiving full and timely payment of principal and interest on that specific debt obligation and how that risk compares with that of all other debt obligations. The rating therefore measures the ability of a company to generate cash in the future. Standard & Poor’s assigns a credit rating both to companies as a whole and to each issuance or class of a company’s debt. A Standard & Poor’s credit rating of BBB-, which is the lowest investment grade rating given by Standard & Poor’s, is assigned to companies or issuances that exhibit adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the company to meet its financial commitments.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

Net Leases

We typically enter into net leases with our tenants. “Net leases” are leases that typically require tenants to pay all or a majority of the operating expenses, including real estate taxes, special assessments and sales and use taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs related to the property, in addition to the lease payments. There are various forms of net leases, typically classified as triple net, double net and bondable. Triple net and bondable leases typically require the tenant to pay all costs associated with a property in addition to the base rent and percentage rent, if any. Double net leases typically require the landlord to be responsible for the roof and structure of the building while the tenant is responsible for all remaining expenses associated with the real estate. Since each lease is an individually negotiated contract between two or more parties, each contract will have different obligations for both the landlord and tenant. Many large national tenants have standard lease forms that generally do not vary from property to property, and we will have limited ability to revise the terms of leases for those tenants.

Our leases have terms that vary. We have acquired and may in the future acquire properties under which the lease terms have partially run. We evaluate the lease term risk based on criteria such as whether the property is in an attractive location, difficult to replace or has other significant favorable real estate attributes. Our leases generally require our tenants to pay a predetermined annual base rent. Some of our leases contain provisions that increase the amount of base rent payable at points during the lease term and/or provide for percentage rent that can be calculated by a number of factors. In addition, our leases generally require that each tenant pay the cost of the liability insurance covering the property or provide such coverage. The third-party liability coverage will insure, among others, us, our General Partner, and any entity formed by us to hold the property. Our leases generally require that each tenant obtain, at its own expense, property insurance naming the above parties as an insured party for fire and other casualty losses in an amount that generally equals the full replacement value of such property. Our tenants are generally required to obtain our General Partner’s approval of all such insurance.

Ownership Structure

For our investments where we are the sole owner, we generally acquire, directly or indirectly, fee simple interests in the property. We may also acquire leasehold interests in real property subject to long-term ground leases. Our General Partner and its affiliates may purchase future investments in their own names or in entities that they control, assume loans in connection with the purchase of properties and temporarily hold title to properties for the purpose of facilitating the acquisition of properties by us.

For our future investments in development properties, we may enter into arrangements with the seller or developer, provided that the property is pre-leased to a high quality tenant. In these cases, we will be obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications and costs approved in advance by our General Partner. We will receive a certificate of an architect, engineer or other appropriate party, stating that the property complies with all plans and specifications. If renovation or remodeling is required prior to the purchase of a property, our General Partner expects to pay a negotiated maximum amount upon completion.

We may enter into sale and leaseback transactions under which we will purchase a property and lease the property back to the seller.

Joint Ventures

We currently own interests in eight properties through joint ventures with affiliates of our General Partner and non-affiliates. The joint ventures are structured as limited partnerships or limited liability companies in which we own interests. Each of these limited partnerships or limited liability companies directly owns one or more of the eight underlying properties. Each general partner or managing member is responsible for establishing policies and operating procedures with respect to the business and affairs of the underlying property. However, we and each of our joint venture partners must approve all significant decisions involving the properties.

- 7 -

Table of Contents

We may invest in additional properties through joint ventures with third-party developers and real estate investors, including our General Partner, its affiliates and entities owned or managed by its affiliates. Such joint ventures may include investments in limited liability companies or other co-ownership arrangements whose purpose is the acquisition or improvement of the properties. Our General Partner and its affiliates may provide services to the joint venture, including, but not limited to, acquisition, development, management, leasing and/or real estate disposition services. Our current joint venture investments contain, and we will not enter into future joint venture investments unless they contain, the following features:


	•	our right either to approve significant decisions of the joint venture or to control operations of the joint venture, subject to the right of the joint venture partner to approve sales or refinancing;

	•	the total compensation paid by us and the joint venture to our General Partner and its affiliates in connection with a joint venture will not exceed the compensation which would be permissible under the Partnership Agreement if we owned 100% of the joint venture;

	•	no duplication of joint venture costs and expenses or of costs and expenses relating to the joint venture business, including organization and syndication expenses, acquisition and development costs; and

	•	any purchase, sale or financing transactions between the joint venture partner and our General Partner or its affiliates must be on terms which are commercially reasonable and comparable to those relating to transactions between unrelated parties.

Our investments in Casa Linda Plaza, The Market at Lake Houston, Woodlake Square and Woodlake Pointe were made through joint ventures with affiliates of our General Partner. For any future investment with our General Partner, its affiliate, or an entity owned or managed by an affiliate, our General Partner or the managing member, largest shareholder, general partner or other controlling or majority owner of the affiliate or such other entity may contribute capital to the joint venture on the same terms and conditions as us. Allocable profits in a joint venture will be calculated based on the sum of net sale proceeds from the sale of a property (after repayment of debt) plus reserves less capital contributions of each joint venture partner plus actual origination and carrying costs of the additional financing incurred in connection with such property. Distributions will be pro rata to the joint venture partners based on their aggregate capital contributions.

Our General Partner or its affiliate may form another partnership or other investment vehicle with essentially the same investment objectives as us and such entity may acquire properties through a joint venture. Such other entities may have as investors controlling persons or other former and current investors in programs sponsored by affiliates. The terms and conditions upon which persons become investors in such other entities may differ from our terms and conditions.

Disposition Policies

Operating Period

During our operating period, our General Partner intends to hold our properties until such time as sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that such objectives will not be met. We have not yet sold any of our properties. We anticipate that we will hold 50% of our properties as income-producing assets during our entire operating period. We intend to sell the other 50% of our properties during favorable market conditions, and we will then reinvest the net proceeds in additional properties. When deciding whether to sell properties during our operating period, our General Partner will consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, cash flow, the availability of other attractive investment opportunities and federal income tax considerations.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

If we sell properties during our operating period, our General Partner anticipates reinvesting the net sales proceeds generated from the sales. In making the determination of whether to reinvest the net proceeds from a particular sale, our General Partner will determine whether we have adequate cash flow and reserves to pay our Limited Partners regular distributions and the special year-end tax distribution.

Liquidation Period

Our General Partner will in good faith actively market for sale all of our properties other than those in the development or redevelopment stage and commence an orderly Partnership liquidation on or before October 31, 2012. Properties in the development or redevelopment stage at the end of the operating period will be marketed for sale upon completion. The operating period may be extended to October 31, 2014 with the consent of Limited Partners owning a majority of the outstanding Units. If our General Partner does not take all commercially reasonable efforts to diligently pursue the portfolio sale and liquidation on our behalf as described above, it shall forfeit its $800,000 investment in our Units.

Once our General Partner has marketed for sale all of our properties, it may take months or years for our General Partner to sell all of our properties and wind up our operations. In connection with the sale of a property, we may take purchase money obligations secured by a mortgage on the property as partial payment, thereby delaying any distribution of sale proceeds to our Limited Partners over the term to maturity of such obligations. The terms of payment to be accorded by us will be affected by custom in the area in which the property is located and the then-prevailing economic conditions.

AmREIT’s Purchase Rights

We have granted AmREIT a limited right of first refusal to purchase our wholly-owned properties that our General Partner determines are in our best interests to sell. For properties we own through a joint venture, we will grant AmREIT this right of first refusal, subject to the approval of our joint venture partners. If our General Partner determines that it is in our best interests to sell one of our properties, our General Partner will notify AmREIT of our desire to sell such property. AmREIT will then have 30 days to determine whether to pay the market value to acquire the property for itself. To determine the market value of a property, both AmREIT and we, at our own cost and expense, shall appoint a real estate appraiser with at least five years full-time commercial appraisal experience and who is a member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI designation). If either of us fails to appoint an appraiser, the single appraiser appointed shall be the sole appraiser and shall determine the market value. Each appraiser shall conduct an independent appraisal of the property within 30 days after the two appraisers are appointed. If the appraised values are within five percent of each other, the market value of the property shall be the mean of the two appraisals. If the two appraisals are more than five percent apart, a third appraiser meeting the qualifications stated above and independent from each party shall be appointed by the existing appraisers. Each of the parties shall bear one-half of the cost of the third appraiser. Within 30 days after its selection, the third appraiser shall complete its appraisal of the property. Upon completion of the third appraisal, if the low appraisal and/or the high appraisal are/is more than five percent lower and/or higher than the middle appraisal, the low appraisal and/or the high appraisal shall be disregarded. If only one appraisal is disregarded, the remaining two appraisals shall be added together and their total divided by two, with the resulting quotient being the market value. If both the low appraisal and the high appraisal are disregarded as stated above, the middle appraisal shall be the market value. AmREIT will have 10 business days after the final determination of market value to elect to purchase the property. If AmREIT agrees to pay the market value for a property, as determined above, we will sell the property to AmREIT. If AmREIT declines to acquire a property or fails to notify us of its intent to acquire a property within the requisite time periods, then we will market the property to third parties.

During 2010, our General Partner notified AmREIT of its intent to sell our Market at Lake Houston property. Our General Partner and AmREIT followed the appraisal process outlined above, and AmREIT exercised its right of first refusal to acquire the property. In February 2011, we sold the Market at Lake Houston property to AmREIT for a combination of cash and the assumption of debt.

- 9 -

Table of Contents

Marketing

Our General Partner believes that relationships and networking are the two primary components of marketing properties for sale. Our General Partner will use its in-house staff along with its relationships with key commercial brokers across the country to sell our properties.

Leverage

We have leveraged and intend to leverage our investments in properties with operating histories using traditional, commercial real estate lending sources, as underwritten by our General Partner and the lender. We have not leveraged and do not intend to leverage equity contributed to joint venture developments, anticipating that local developers will employ construction financing consistent with that of traditional real estate projects and underwritten by the development partner, our General Partner and the lender.

We generally finance the acquisition of properties pursuant to new financing or assumption of existing indebtedness. We may refinance one of our properties after it has increased in value or when more favorable terms are available. Refinancing may permit us to retain such property and, at the same time, generate distributions to our Partners, enable us to engage in renovation or remodeling activities, or make further acquisitions. We may incur debt for expenditures related to our properties, including expenses to facilitate the sale or payment of capital expenditures. We may not incur indebtedness (or any refinancing thereof) to acquire or improve properties in an amount greater than 75% of our cash and cash equivalents plus the market value of our portfolio based on a cap rate approach applied to the net operating income of the property, with a target of 60% of the value of our assets.

We may borrow money from AmREIT or its affiliates if our General Partner, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, determines that the transaction is on terms that are fair and reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.

Other Investments

We currently own interests in eight properties through joint ventures. We may invest in other ownership interests in entities that own real estate, including in connection with joint ventures. We make these investments when our General Partner considers it more efficient to acquire an entity owning such real property rather than to acquire the properties directly.

Our General Partner invests our reserves and other available funds not committed to investments in properties in United States government securities, securities issued and fully guaranteed by United States government agencies, securities issued and fully guaranteed by states or municipalities, certificates of deposit and time or demand deposits in commercial banks, bankers’ acceptances, savings and loan association deposits or deposits in members of the Federal Home Loan Bank System or money market instrument funds.

Conflicts of Interest

Our General Partner is subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of its relationship with us, the Limited Partners and AmREIT. Our General Partner and its affiliates have and will continue to try to balance our interests with their duties to other AmREIT-sponsored programs. However, to the extent that our General Partner or its affiliates take actions that are more favorable to other entities than to us, these actions could have a negative impact on our financial performance and, consequently, on distributions to our Limited Partners. Some of these conflicts are described below.

Limited Financial Resources

Our General Partner has no assets other than its general partner interest in us and its investment in our Units. In the event we have substantial capital needs, our General Partner will not have sufficient financial resources to satisfy these needs. In addition, AmREIT, the parent of our General Partner, has substantial financial obligations related to its properties and its interest in other programs and may not be able to provide us financial assistance in the event we have capital needs.

- 10 -

Table of Contents

Interests in Other Real Estate Programs

AmREIT sponsors and manages real estate programs and ventures. The existing entities that our General Partner’s management also manages that have similar investment objectives and that may compete with us are AmREIT Income & Growth Fund, Ltd., AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund, Ltd., AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund II, Ltd., AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund IV, L.P. and AmREIT. In addition to identifying, originating and effecting property acquisitions and development projects for us, our General Partner’s management and its affiliates will continue to acquire and develop real estate for the account of other affiliated and unaffiliated investors. Conflicts of interest with our General Partner’s management may arise in its allocating opportunities between us and other programs, particularly where our General Partner’s profit or loss interest in such other investment is different than our General Partner’s interest in the Partnership.

Conflicts of interest may also arise in connection with our General Partner’s responsibilities to us and the responsibilities of its affiliates to other entities. For example, conflicts of interest could arise in management’s allocation of its time and access to resources, such as financing, goods, material or labor, or in connection with its access to the leasing or resale markets, particularly during times these resources are scarce or in short supply. Conflicts could also result in the selection and marketing of projects if shortages of properties, materials or labor are insufficient causing market demands to require our General Partner’s management to allocate project opportunities between us and its affiliates.

Because the management of our General Partner manages other investment funds and entities with similar investment strategies, including AmREIT, competition for properties will create a conflict of interest. Management expects to manage this conflict by providing a pipeline of real estate projects and opportunities to support all of its activities. All potential development and acquisition opportunities will initially be presented to AmREIT. If AmREIT elects not to make the investment, our General Partner’s management will determine which of the entities that it advises, including us would be most appropriate to make the proposed investment. To determine which entity should make the investment, management will first evaluate the investment objectives of each investment fund and determine if the opportunity is suitable for each fund. If the proposed investment is appropriate for more than one fund, management will then evaluate the portfolio of each fund, both in terms of geographic diversity and tenant concentration, to determine if the investment is most suitable to one fund. If the geographic diversity and tenant concentration analysis is not determinative, management will allocate the property to the fund with uncommitted funds available for the longest period of time. Our General Partner’s management may also allow multiple investment funds to enter into joint ventures for the purchase or acquisition of a property.

Competition for Management Services

Our General Partner’s management is engaged in substantial activities apart from our business, including their duties to AmREIT and other real estate programs sponsored by AmREIT. As such, they will devote only so much of their entire time to our affairs as is reasonably required in their judgment, and they could have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other entities. Our General Partner believes that it has sufficient staff to fully discharge its responsibilities to us.

Leasing Agents

Our General Partner retains the services of affiliated leasing agents to lease the properties in which we have invested. Because these leasing agents provide similar services to affiliates of our General Partner, including AmREIT, they face conflicts of interest if they are seeking to lease our properties and similar properties of its affiliates at the same time. In such an event, the affiliated leasing agent will seek to mitigate any potential conflict by presenting a potential tenant with all of the available properties so that the potential tenant can select the property with the size, rent, location and other characteristics most suitable to its needs.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

Properties

We rely on our General Partner and its affiliates in the selection, management and sale of the properties and do not have independent representation in this regard. Conflicts of interest could arise in connection with any interests affiliates of our General Partner may have in a particular property, including interests it may have as an affiliate of AmREIT in connection with any sale of a property to AmREIT, and those of the Limited Partners in operating the Partnership.

Sale of Properties

Our General Partner actively manages our Actively Managed properties during the operating period. During the operating period, our General Partner will sell our properties from time to time to third-party real estate investors. Our General Partner may receive compensation in the form of a brokerage commission for the work performed in the sale of the properties. Because there is potential for our General Partner to earn a brokerage commission on each property sale, there is a conflict of interest in that our General Partner may sell a property simply to earn a brokerage commission, even if it is not in our best interests or the best interests of the Limited Partners.

No Arm’s-Length Agreements

The compensation payable to our General Partner and its affiliates has not been determined by arm’s-length negotiations. Also, a significant portion of this compensation is payable irrespective of the quality of the services provided or our success or profitability. There is no assurance that the amounts or terms of such compensation will not exceed that which would be paid to unrelated persons under similar circumstances in arm’s-length transactions.

AmREIT’s Interests in Other Programs

AmREIT, our General Partner’s parent, engages for the account of others in other business ventures involving real estate development and investment. Moreover, AmREIT or its affiliates, including our General Partner, may in the future serve as management for the general partner of other companies or ventures, and acquire, develop and operate real estate related activities in the same areas as ours for their own account. Neither we nor any Limited Partner will be entitled to any interest in such other ventures.

Transactions with Affiliates

We may, from time to time, sell some of our properties to AmREIT. As a result of the inherent conflict in such a sale, we will only sell a property to AmREIT if it agrees to pay the market value or the amount of a bona fide final third-party offer for that property. See “Item 1. Business – Disposition Policies – AmREIT’s Purchase Rights” for a more detailed description of AmREIT’s rights. In addition, we may borrow money from AmREIT or its affiliates. Although our General Partner will only approve an affiliated borrowing transaction if, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, it determines that the terms are fair and reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated third parties, our General Partner could face conflicts of interest in connection with such a transaction that may not be resolved in the best interests of our Limited Partners.

In the event our General Partner or its affiliates receive compensation from us for any additional services performed on our behalf, such services will only be provided on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than can be obtained from independent third parties for comparable services in the same location. Such services may include, but are not limited to, leasing coordination fees, construction and construction management fees, including in connection with renovation and remodeling, and tax appeal fees. The fees for such services, if provided by affiliates, will be separately itemized and retained in our records.

Affiliated Property Manager and Construction Manager

ARIC, an affiliate of our General Partner, performs property management services for all of the properties in which we have an interest and may provide property management services for properties in which we acquire an interest in the future. ARIC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmREIT and the officers of our General Partner are also officers of ARIC. As a result, we might not always have the benefit of independent property management to the same extent as if our General Partner and the property manager were unaffiliated. In addition, given that ARIC is an affiliate of our General Partner, any agreements with ARIC are not negotiated at arm’s-length as they would between unrelated parties.

- 12 -

Table of Contents

AmREIT Construction Company, an affiliate of our General Partner, has historically provided construction and construction management services for certain of our development and redevelopment projects. AmREIT Construction Company completed our Westside Plaza and Casa Linda redevelopment projects in 2007 and 2009, respectively. During 2008, AmREIT Construction Company ceased providing general contracting services. We may engage ARIC in the future for construction management services. As a result of us using AmREIT Construction Company for these services, we have not had the benefit of independent construction management to the same extent as if AmREIT Construction Company was unaffiliated. Since ARIC is an affiliate of our General Partner, we do not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of any contracts we enter into with ARIC that would apply between unrelated parties.

Lack of Separate Representation

Our legal counsel acts and may in the future act as counsel to us, our General Partner, AmREIT and certain of our respective affiliates. There is a possibility that in the future, the interests of the various parties may become adverse, and under the Code of Professional Responsibility of the legal profession, our counsel may be precluded from representing any one or all of such parties. In the event that a dispute were to arise between us, our General Partner, AmREIT or any of our respective affiliates, separate counsel for such matters will be retained as and when appropriate.

Tax Matters Partner

In the event of an audit of our federal income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), it is possible that the interests of our General Partner in such an audit could become inconsistent with or adverse to the interests of the Limited Partners. Our expenses in contesting any such audit may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. Further, our General Partner, who is primarily responsible for contesting federal income tax adjustments proposed by the IRS, may be subject to various conflicts of interest in connection with the negotiation and settlement of issues raised by the IRS in a federal income tax audit.

Employees

We have no employees. Our affairs are managed by our General Partner, and our General Partner and its affiliates provide services to us related to acquisitions, property management, accounting, investor relations and other administrative services. We are dependent upon our General Partner and its affiliates for these services.

See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” for a discussion of our compensation arrangements.

Insurance

We believe that our properties are adequately insured.

Competition

As we purchase properties for our portfolio, we are in competition with other potential buyers, including our affiliates, for the same properties. As a result, we may either have to pay more to purchase the property than we would if there were no other potential acquirers or locate another property that meets our investment criteria. Although our retail properties have an average occupancy of 77%, and we have acquired, and intend to continue to acquire, properties subject to existing leases, the leasing of real estate is highly competitive, and we may experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects. As a result, we may have to provide free rent, incur charges for tenant improvements, or offer other inducements, or we might not be able to timely lease the space, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. At the time we elect to dispose of our properties, we will also be in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for their properties.

- 13 -

Table of Contents

Concentration of Credit Risk

We have geographic concentration in our property holdings. In particular, as of December 31, 2010, all of our properties were located in Texas. We have tenant concentration in our properties. Rental income generated from H-E-B Grocery represented 23% of our 2010 rental income.

Compliance with Governmental Regulations

Under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, as an owner or operator of real estate, we may be required to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances, asbestos-containing materials, or petroleum product releases at our properties. We may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred by those parties in connection with the contamination. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contaminations at any of our properties may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the properties or to borrow using the properties as collateral. We could also be liable under common law to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from environmental contamination coming from our properties.

All of our properties are acquired subject to satisfactory Phase I environmental assessments, which generally involve the inspection of site conditions without invasive testing such as sampling or analysis of soil, groundwater or other media or conditions; or satisfactory Phase II environmental assessments, which generally involve the testing of soil, groundwater or other media and conditions. Our General Partner may determine that we will acquire a property in which a Phase I or Phase II environmental assessment indicates that a problem exists and has not been resolved at the time the property is acquired, provided that (A) the seller has (1) agreed in writing to indemnify us and/or (2) established an escrow account with predetermined funds greater than the estimated costs to remediate the problem; or (B) we have negotiated other comparable arrangements, including, without limitation, a reduction in the purchase price. We cannot be sure, however, that any seller will be able to pay under an indemnity we obtain or that the amount in escrow will be sufficient to pay all remediation costs. Further, we cannot be sure that all environmental liabilities have been identified or that no prior owner, operator or current occupant has created an environmental condition not known to us. Moreover, we cannot be sure that (1) future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability or (2) the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by tenants and occupants of the properties, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the properties (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not applicable.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Overview

During the period from April 19, 2005 (inception) to December 31, 2010, we acquired interests in eleven properties. We directly own three properties and have investments in eight properties through joint venture arrangements. We have included a description of the types of real estate in which we have invested and will invest, and a summary of our investment policies and limitations on investment and the competitive conditions in which we operate under “Item 1. Business” above. We believe our properties are suitable for their intended use and are adequately insured.

- 14 -

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, we owned interests in the following properties, all of which are located in Texas:


Property	Location	Square Footage		Percent Owned		Annualized Base Rent (1)		Percentage of Total Annualized Base Rent (1)
Market at Lake Houston (2)	Houston		101,799		60	$	1,581,000		9.8
Lantern Lane	Houston		79,462		100		1,296,000		8.0
Olmos Creek	San Antonio		102,178		100		854,000		5.3
Westside Plaza	Houston		43,021		100		526,000		3.3
Berkeley Square (3)	Dallas		125,333		20		1,983,000		12.3
Casa Linda Plaza (3)	Dallas		324,569		50		3,293,000		20.4
Preston Park Gold (3)	Dallas		101,096		20		791,000		4.9
Preston Towne Crossing (3)	Dallas		169,844		20		2,598,000		16.0
Woodlake Pointe (3)(4)	Houston		82,120		30		216,000		1.3
Woodlake Square (3)	Houston		205,522		3		1,564,000		9.7
5433 Westheimer (3)	Houston		133,881		58		1,465,000		9.0
Totals			1,468,825			$	16,167,000		100.0


(1)	Annualized base rent represents base rents in place on leases with rent having commenced as of December 31, 2010 and does not reflect straight-line rent or other adjustments under generally accepted accounting principles.

(2)	Property is 60% owned through a joint venture which is consolidated in our financial statements and was sold subsequent to December 31, 2010.

(3)	Property is owned through a joint venture that is not consolidated in our financial statements.

(4)	As of December 31, 2010 this property was occupied by a tenant with a temporary lease.

Description of Our Real Estate Investments

Westside Plaza

On September 30, 2005, we purchased a 100% interest in the Westside Plaza property, a 43,021 square foot retail shopping center located in Houston, Texas. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and assumed two 20-year mortgage loans with a June 2015 maturity to fund the acquisition of the Westside Plaza property. The first loan in the amount of $10.2 million bears an annual interest rate of 5.62% and had an outstanding principal balance of $9.4 million as of December 31, 2010. The second loan in the amount of $640,000 bears an annual interest rate of 12.75% and had an outstanding principal balance of $635,000 as of December 31, 2010.

The Westside Plaza property was 43% leased at December 31, 2010 and is anchored by Fadi’s restaurant, which occupies 5,125 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire in January 2012. In December 2010, we entered into a lease agreement with a women's fashion retailer for 24,500 square feet. The lease expires in June 2016. We completed the redevelopment of the property by adding aesthetic enhancements during 2007.

- 15 -

Table of Contents

The Market at Lake Houston

On December 12, 2005, through a joint venture arrangement with an affiliate of our General Partner, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund, Ltd., we acquired a 60% interest in The Market at Lake Houston property, a 101,799 square foot retail shopping center located in Houston, Texas. Our joint venture partner owns the other 40% interest in the joint venture. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and obtained a 30-year mortgage loan to fund the acquisition of The Market at Lake Houston property. The loan was in the amount of $15.7 million, bears an annual interest rate of 5.75% and is interest-only until January 1, 2016.

This property was 100% leased as of December 31, 2010. H-E-B Grocery is the largest tenant occupying 80,641 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire February 2017. We acquired this property with the expectation that it would provide a stable stream of rental income.

In February 2011, we sold the Market at Lake Houston property to AmREIT for a combination of cash and the assumption of debt. The acquisition was subject to the appraisal process set forth in “Item 1. Business – Disposition Policies – AmREIT’s Purchase Rights.”

5433 Westheimer

On March 31, 2006, through a special purpose entity, 5433 Westheimer, LP, we purchased a 50% interest in the 5433 Westheimer property, a 133,881 square foot, 11 story office building located in Houston, Texas. Our joint venture partner, Songy Partners, purchased the other 50% interest in the joint venture. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We acquired our interest in the 5433 Westheimer property with proceeds from the Offering. In January 2008, we mortgaged our interest in this property with a $32.9 million, three-year variable-rate loan with a third-party lender. In December 2010, we elected to extend the loan for a term of one year. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 1.70%. The office building was 63% leased as of December 31, 2010. Prosperity Bank is the largest tenant occupying 17,185 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire in May 2011. We acquired this property with the intent to redevelop the site into a mixed use complex with retail shopping, office, and hospitality components. We extended a loan in the amount of approximately $7.0 million to 5433 Westheimer, LP in March 2006 in connection with our plans for redeveloping the site. This loan had a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 2%. During 2008, the property was refinanced with a third-party lender. In conjunction with that refinancing, the lender required an additional equity contribution of $7.0 million. This requirement was satisfied through conversion of our $7.0 million loan to an equity interest in the property. We established a note receivable with our joint venture partner for its portion of the additional equity contribution ($3.5 million). In November 2008, we converted $800,000 of that note into an additional 7.5% equity interest in the property. The balance of the note was paid in full during 2009. The property is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as it does not meet all conditions for consolidation outlined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810 Consolidation. We completed redevelopment of the office building and construction of a 152-room hotel in October 2009 at a total cost of approximately $31.7 million. During 2010, the hotel was approximately 72% occupied, and generated an average daily rate of $109.

Olmos Creek

On June, 30, 2006, through our wholly-owned special purpose entity, AmREIT Olmos Creek, LP, we purchased a 100% interest in the Olmos Creek property, a 102,178 square foot retail shopping center located in San Antonio, Texas. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering to fund the acquisition of Olmos Creek. Subsequent to the acquisition, we obtained a 10-year interest-only mortgage loan with a November 2011 call date in the amount of $11.2 million that bears an annual interest rate of 6.02%. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 86% leased. Major tenants include H-E-B Grocery as the largest tenant occupying 55,513 square feet, Subway, UPS Store and Edward Jones. Additionally, we have ground leases with Compass Bank through May 2017 and McDonald’s through June 2017. We acquired this property with the expectation that it would provide a stable stream of rental income. We currently do not have plans to renovate or redevelop the Olmos Creek property.

During 2006, we sold a parcel of the Olmos Creek property to an unaffiliated third-party for $775,000. We paid our General Partner $25,000 in real estate brokerage commissions on the sale.

- 16 -

Table of Contents

Lantern Lane

On September 29, 2006, through our wholly-owned special purpose entity, AmREIT Lantern Lane, LP, we purchased a 100% interest in the Lantern Lane property, a 79,462 square foot retail shopping center located in Houston, Texas. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and obtained a 5-year interest-only mortgage loan with a maturity of September 2011 in the amount of $13.4 million that bears an annual interest rate of 6.0% to fund the acquisition of the Lantern Lane property.

The property was 88% leased at December 31, 2010. Rice Food Market, Inc. is the largest tenant occupying 21,450 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire in January 2013. We acquired this property with the expectation that it would provide a stable stream of rental income and have no plans to redevelop the property.

Properties in Plano, Texas Owned Through a Joint Venture with an Affiliate of JPMorgan

Through our investment in PTC/BSQ Holding Company LLC (“PTC/BSQ”), we purchased a 20% interest in Preston Towne Crossing, Berkeley Square and Preston Park Gold. The joint venture, 80% owned by JPMorgan Asset Management, acquired each of these shopping centers from unrelated third parties. These retail centers, further described below, are adjacent to one another in Plano, Texas, and total 396,273 square feet. Preston Park Gold was acquired by PTC/BSQ on November 15, 2006 while Preston Towne Crossing and Berkeley Square were both acquired on December 7, 2006.

Preston Park Gold. The 101,096-square-foot Preston Park Gold, which is the former Target/Vineyard Antique Mall building, is located between Preston Towne Crossing and Berkeley Square and was retrofitted in 2007.

Major tenants of the Preston Gold property include Gold’s Gym which occupies 49,427 square feet and Chair King which occupies 27,438 square feet. Leases for these tenants are scheduled to expire in October 2024 and June 2017, respectively. The property was redeveloped in July 2007. The property is unencumbered and was 84% occupied as of December 31, 2010.

Preston Towne Crossing and Berkeley Square. The 169,844-square-foot Preston Towne Crossing and the 125,333-square-foot Berkeley Square were 78% and 88% occupied, respectively at December 31, 2010 and are located on 35 acres at the northeast corner of Preston Road and West Park Boulevard in Plano. PTC/BSQ assumed mortgage loans in the amount of $22.4 million and $18.1 million encumbering Preston Towne Crossing and Berkeley Square, respectively. Each of the loans matures in January 2012. The Preston Towne Crossing loan bears interest at 5.83% and had a balance of $20.7 million as of December 31, 2010. The Berkeley Square loan bears interest at 5.87% and had a balance of $16.8 million as of December 31, 2010.

Major tenants of the Preston Towne Crossing property include REI which occupies 27,000 square feet and Park Plaza Salon which occupies 20,000 square feet. Leases for these tenants are scheduled to expire in April 2015 and January 2012, respectively. Studio Movie Grill Concepts, Ltd. is the largest tenant of Berkeley Square occupying 30,977 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire in February 2015.

Developed during 1986 and 1987, the shopping centers underwent renovations during 2007 and 2008 to enhance the facades, complete store pop-ups, upgrade landscaping and add new signage. These enhancements were completed during 2008. The properties also include undeveloped land behind Berkeley Square that we believe can be sold to an office or residential developer.

Casa Linda Plaza

On December 8, 2006, through a joint venture arrangement with an affiliate of our General Partner, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (“MIG IV”), we acquired a 50% interest in the Casa Linda Plaza property, a 324,569 square foot retail shopping center located in Dallas, Texas. Our joint venture partner owns the remaining 50% interest in the joint venture. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and obtained a 7-year mortgage loan with a maturity of January 2014 to fund the acquisition of the Casa Linda Plaza property. The loan was in the amount of $38.0 million, bears an annual interest rate of 5.48% and is interest-only until maturity.

- 17 -

Table of Contents

The property was 72% leased at December 31, 2010. Albertson’s is the largest tenant occupying 59,561 square feet with a lease scheduled to expire in July 2016. Additional tenants are Petco, Starbucks, Wachovia, Chili’s, Blockbuster, and Supercuts. The property was originally built between 1946 and 1949. During 2009, the Casa Linda Plaza property completed a substantial renovation that has allowed the property to maintain its historical character and prominence in the community, while updating the property’s features. The renovation was completed in April 2009 at a cost of $7.1 million.

Woodlake Square

On August 31, 2007, through a joint venture arrangement with affiliates of our General Partner, MIG IV and ARIC, we acquired a 30% interest in the Woodlake Square property, a 205,522 square foot retail shopping center located in Houston, Texas. Our joint venture partners acquired the other 70% interest in the joint venture. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and obtained a 3-year mortgage loan from Frost Bank to fund the acquisition of the Woodlake Square property. The loan was in the amount of $24.0 million and was interest-only until maturity. The interest related to this debt was at a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.35%. In December 2007, the property entered into an interest rate swap to hedge its position on the mortgage, effectively fixing the investment rate at 5.465%.

In July 2010, we and our affiliated joint venture partners on our Woodlake Square property, MIG IV and ARIC, entered into a joint venture agreement with a third party on our Woodlake Square property. As part of this transaction, we and our affiliates sold 90% of our interest in the property and retained a 10% ownership interest, which carries a promoted interest in cash flows once an 11.65% preferred return threshold is met on the project. Prior to the transaction, we owned a 30% interest in the property, and we own a 3% interest, post-transaction. We recorded an impairment of approximately $185,000 on this investment which has been recorded as impairment in equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries in our consolidated statements of operations. The sale generated cash proceeds of approximately $3.4 million, and we, our affiliated partners, and our third party joint venture partner are responsible for funding our pro rata amount of the redevelopment costs on the project, which are currently estimated to be approximately $8.0 million. Additionally, as part of the transaction, the $23.8 million loan on the property, which was due to mature in September 2010, was paid in full at closing. The new entity in which we now own a 3% interest, VIF II/AmREIT Woodlake L.P., is the borrower on the new $20.9 million loan, which has a 3-year term with two one-year extension options, provided certain conditions are met. The maturity of the new loan is July 2017. We, along with our affiliate, MIG IV are joint and several repayment guarantors on the loan. We will continue to account for this investment using the equity method given our ability to significantly influence the property’s operations.

Redevelopment of the property began in July 2010 and the total cost of the project is estimated to be $8.0 million. The former Randall’s building has been demolished and the pad site was turned over to Randall’s on time and within budget. The redevelopment is on track to be completed in April 2011. The property was 62% leased at December 31, 2010. Randall’s, the largest tenant, signed a new lease in January 2010 that expires in 2035. Additional tenants are Walgreen’s, Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Ragin Cajun, and Woodlake Children’s Center.

Woodlake Pointe

On November 21, 2007, through a joint venture arrangement with affiliates of our General Partner, MIG IV and ARIC, we acquired a 30% interest in AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, L.P. which owns the Woodlake Pointe property, a 82,120 square foot retail shopping center located in Houston, Texas. Our joint venture partners own the other 70% interest in the joint venture. The property was purchased from an unaffiliated third-party. We used proceeds from the Offering and paid cash for the acquisition.

On May 29, 2008, through the same joint venture arrangement with affiliates of our General Partner, MIG IV and ARIC, we acquired a 30% interest in a tract of land adjacent to Woodlake Pointe. Our joint venture partners own the other 70% interest in the property. The acquisition is accounted for as part of AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, L.P. We used proceeds from the Offering and paid cash for the acquisition.

- 18 -

Table of Contents

We are currently evaluating options to redevelop this property. Louis Shanks was our sole tenant during the 2010 period. Because this property is under redevelopment, we recorded rental income as a reduction to the basis of the asset. The Louis Shanks lease represented a temporary lease that expired in January 2011. We are in the anchor leasing stage of development and currently are under letter of intent with a large national fitness tenant for a 45,000 square foot building on the unimproved land and are in discussions with an anchor tenant for the existing building. Phase I of the redevelopment is expected to commence in July 2011.

Portfolio Information

The following table shows our five highest tenant industry concentrations for all properties in which we own an interest as of December 31, 2010:


Industry	Total Number of Tenants		Annualized Base Rent		Percentage of Total Annualized Base Rent
Dining		45	$	3,470,000		21.5
Grocery		8		2,583,000		16.0
Specialty Retail		42		2,381,000		14.7
Services		47		1,371,000		8.5
Banking		14		1,189,000		7.4

The following table shows our tenants which occupy 10% or more of the rentable square feet for each property in which we own an interest and the lease expirations of such tenants as of December 31, 2010, assuming no exercise of renewal option or termination rights.


Property	Industry	Square Footage		Percentage of Property Rentable Square Footage		Year of Lease Expiration
Tenant
Market at Lake Houston (1)
H-E-B Grocery	Grocery		80,641		79		2017
Lantern Lane
Rice Food Markets, Inc.	Grocery		21,450		27		2013
Fidelity Investments	Banking		9,578		12		2013
Olmos Creek
H-E-B Grocery	Grocery		65,681		64		2020
Westside Plaza
Fadi’s Mediterranean Delight	Dining		5,125		12		2012
Berkeley Square
Movie Grill Concepts, Ltd.	Entertainment		30,977		25		2015
Casa Linda Plaza
Albertson’s	Grocery		59,561		18		2016
Preston Park Gold
Gold’s Gym	Gym		49,427		49		2025
Chair King	Specialty Retail		27,438		27		2017
Preston Towne Crossing
Recreational Equipment, Inc.	Sporting Goods		27,000		16		2015
Plaza Park Salon	Salon		20,000		12		2012
Woodlake Pointe
Louis Shanks of Texas (2)	Specialty Retail		82,120		100		2011
Woodlake Square
Randall’s	Grocery		56,430		28		2013


(1)	Property was sold subsequent to year end.

- 19 -

Table of Contents

(2)

This property is under development, and this lease represents a temporary lease that expired in January 2011. Because this property is under redevelopment, we recorded rental income as a reduction to the basis of the asset. We are in the anchor leasing stage of development and currently are under letter of intent with a large national fitness tenant for a 45,000 square foot building on the unimproved land and are in discussions with an anchor tenants for the existing building and pads. Phase I of the redevelopment is expected to commence in the middle of 2011.

The following table shows lease expirations for our four consolidated properties as of December 31, 2010, during each of the next ten years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or termination rights.


Year of Lease Expiration	Total Number of Leases		Rentable Square Feet		Annualized Base Rent		Percentage of Total Annualized Base Rent
2011		6		10,662	$	255,000		6.0
2012		10		27,023		566,000		13.3
2013		11		56,476		1,030,000		24.2
2014		6		11,118		251,000		5.9
2015		4		7,282		168,000		4.0
2016		1		1,172		77,000		1.8
2017		5		84,815		1,347,000		31.6
2018		2		7,000		161,000		3.8
2019		—		—		—		0.0
2020		3		68,644		393,000		9.2
Thereafter		1		4,550		8,400		0.2
Totals		49		278,742	$	4,256,400		100.0

The following table shows lease expirations for our seven non-consolidated properties as of December 31, 2010, during each of the next ten years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or termination rights.


Year of Lease Expiration	Total Number of Leases		Rentable Square Feet		Annualized Base Rent		Percentage of Total Annualized Base Rent
2011 (1)		56		195,147	$	2,611,000		21.9
2012		43		115,610		2,044,000		17.2
2013		37		140,316		1,854,000		15.6
2014		18		46,400		889,000		7.4
2015		31		142,579		2,126,000		17.9
2016		13		92,052		803,000		6.7
2017		1		27,438		338,000		2.8
2018		1		7,644		168,000		1.4
2019		4		9,594		189,000		1.6
2020		1		3,710		122,000		1.0
Thereafter		5		75,162		766,000		6.5
Totals		210		855,652	$	11,910,000		100.0


(1)	Includes the expiration of a short-term lease with Louis Shanks for 82,120 square feet of Woodlake Pointe.

As of December 31, 2010, we have invested substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering in real properties. Our dispositions have been limited to the sale of a parcel of land on our Olmos Creek property in San Antonio, Texas in 2006. This sale generated $775,000 in proceeds.

- 20 -

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. Neither we nor our properties are the subject of any non-routine pending legal proceeding, nor are we aware of any proceeding that a governmental authority is contemplating against us.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Holders

On April 19, 2005, we commenced the Offering. We closed the Offering on October 31, 2006 after having raised aggregate gross proceeds of $71,090,290 through the sale of 2,844 Units to 1,160 Limited Partners. As of March 31, 2011, we have 2,833 units outstanding held by 1,161 limited partners.

There is no established public trading market for our Units. The Units, which are “restricted securities” as defined in Rule 144 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act, must be held indefinitely unless they are subsequently registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws or unless, upon the advice of counsel satisfactory to us, the Units are sold in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of such laws. As of December 31, 2010, no Units were eligible for sale under Rule 144 or that we have agreed to register under the Securities Act for sale by Limited Partners and there were no Units that are being, or have been publicly proposed to be, publicly offered by us. No Units have been sold since we closed the Offering on October 31, 2006.

Distributions

The following table shows the distributions to our Limited Partners we have declared (including the total amount paid and the amount paid on a per Unit basis) from the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010:

- 21 -

Table of Contents


Period Paid (1)	Total Amount of Distributions Paid		Distribution Per Unit
January, 2009	$	177,101	$	62.50
February, 2009		177,026		62.50
March, 2009		177,026		62.50
April, 2009		177,026		62.50
May, 2009		177,026		62.50
June, 2009		177,026		62.50
July, 2009		177,026		62.50
August, 2009		—		—
September, 2009		—		—
October, 2009		—		—
November, 2009		—		—
December, 2009		—		—
January, 2010		—		—
February, 2010		—		—
March, 2010		—		—
April, 2010		—		—
May, 2010		—		—
June, 2010		—		—
July, 2010		—		—
August, 2010		—		—
September, 2010		—		—
October, 2010		—		—
November, 2010		—		—
December, 2010		—		—
Total	$	1,239,257


(1)	Distributions were paid 15 days in arrears. Distributions above, paid between January 2008 and July 2009 were declared between December 2007 and June 2009.

We declared monthly distributions to our Limited Partners at a rate of 7.5% per annum from January 2006 through November 2008. From December 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009, distributions were declared at a rate of 3.0% per annum. We suspended all distribution payments in July 2009, and do not anticipate reinstating distributions until improvements in the real estate and liquidity markets warrant such reinstatement. We have reported a cumulative net loss for GAAP and tax purposes, primarily due to the non-cash charges associated with depreciation of our real estate assets. Accordingly, all of the distributions we have paid through December 31, 2010 constitute a return of capital to our Limited Partners for tax purposes. The source of such distributions has been cash flows from operations as well as from our capital-raising activities. One of our primary goals is to pay regular (monthly) distributions to our Limited Partners. The funds we receive from operations that are available for distribution may be affected by a number of factors, including the following:


	•	our operating and interest expenses;

	•	the ability of tenants to meet their obligations under the leases associated with our properties;

	•	our ability to keep our properties occupied;

	•	our ability to maintain or increase rental rates when renewing or replacing current leases;

	•	capital expenditures and reserves for such expenditures;

- 22 -

Table of Contents


	•	the issuance of additional shares; and

	•	financings and refinancings.

We qualified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2005. For income tax purposes, distributions to our Limited Partners are characterized as ordinary income, capital gains, or as a return of a Limited Partner’s invested capital.

Since our inception, we have redeemed 11.2 Units. As of June 30, 2009, we suspended all future redemptions of Units.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


	Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” preceding Part I of this Annual Report.

Overview

We are a Texas limited partnership formed on April 19, 2005 to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture or other arrangements, commercial retail real estate consisting of single-tenant and multi-tenant properties throughout the United States net leased to investment grade and other creditworthy tenants. We focus on properties characterized by high automobile traffic counts, high populations, high household incomes and limited opportunities for competition.

We have no employees and are managed by AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth III Corporation, our General Partner, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Our General Partner is a subsidiary of AmREIT, Inc., an SEC reporting, non-traded Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust. In addition to owning its general partner interest in us for which it contributed $1,000, our General Partner contributed $800,000 to us in exchange for limited partnership units, or Units, which represent approximately 1% of the outstanding Units. The remaining Units are held by other Limited Partners. We qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from rental income from our properties, primarily from net leasing arrangements where most of the operating expenses of the properties are absorbed by our tenants. As a result, our operating results and cash flows are primarily influenced by rental income from our properties and interest expense on our property acquisition indebtedness. Rental income accounted for 100% of our total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. As of December 31, 2010, our properties had an average occupancy of 77%, and the average debt leverage ratio of the properties in which we have an investment was approximately 60%, with 70% of such debt carrying a fixed rate of interest.

We commenced our principal operations on June 30, 2005, when we raised the minimum offering of $2.0 million pursuant to the terms the Offering Memorandum and issued the initial 80 Units. AmREIT Securities Company served as the dealer manager for our Offering. As of October 31, 2006, we had received approximately $71.1 million for the sale of 2,844 Units and closed the Offering. Our Units were sold in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and are not currently listed on a national exchange. No established public trading market currently exists for the Units.

- 23 -

Table of Contents

On April 30, 2007 we filed a Form 10-SB to register our Units pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. We are subject to the registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act because the aggregate value of our assets exceeds applicable thresholds and the Units of record are held by 500 or more persons.

As of December 31, 2010, our investments included three wholly-owned properties comprising approximately 225,000 square feet of gross leasable area, one property in which we own a controlling interest through a joint venture comprising approximately 102,000 square feet of gross leasable area and seven properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprising approximately 1,142,000 square feet of gross leasable area. As of December 31, 2010, we have invested substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering in real properties. All of our properties are located in highly populated, suburban communities in Texas.

Selecting properties with high quality tenants and mitigating risk through diversifying our tenant base is at the forefront of our acquisition and leasing strategy. We believe our strategy of purchasing premier retail properties in high-traffic, highly-populated areas will produce stable earnings and growth opportunities in future years.

Given the current economic environment we ceased distributions beginning July 1, 2009. We will continue to monitor the real estate market to determine if it is in our Partners’ best interest to reinstate dividends at any point in the future. We believe the real estate market will improve prior to our expected liquidation commencement date of October 31, 2012; however, we will seek to postpone liquidation if we feel it is not in the best interests of the Partners at the time.

Our Units were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and are not currently listed on a national exchange. These Units will be transferable only if we register them under applicable securities laws (such registration is not expected) or pursuant to an exemption under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We do not anticipate that any public market for the Units will develop.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

Our results of operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, are subject to management’s evaluation and interpretation of business conditions, retailer performance, changing capital market conditions and other factors, which could affect the ongoing viability of our tenants. Management believes the most critical accounting policies in this regard are revenue recognition, regular evaluation of whether the value of a real estate asset has been impaired, accounting for the investment in real estate assets, accounting for the investment in non-consolidated entities, allowance for uncollectible accounts and accounting for real estate acquisitions. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience as well as various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from those estimates, perhaps in material adverse ways, and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. All of the leases are accounted for as operating leases and although certain leases of the properties provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or increases or decreases in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. In all cases, we have determined that we are the owner of the tenant improvements. In cases where tenant improvements are made prior to lease commencement, the leased asset is considered to be the finished space, and revenue recognition therefore begins when the improvements are substantially complete.

- 24 -

Table of Contents

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our real estate assets, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. When indicators of potential impairment are present that indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors which require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each property.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures related to the development of real estate are carried at cost which includes capitalized carrying charges, acquisition costs and development costs. Carrying charges, primarily interest and loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under construction are capitalized as part of construction in progress. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy.

We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments, which are based on estimates, have a direct impact on net income. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of up to 39 years for buildings and site improvements and over the term of the lease for tenant improvements and intangible lease costs.

Investment in Non-consolidated Entities

As of December 31, 2010, we had ownership interests in eleven real estate properties, four of which are consolidated into our financial statements. Although we exercise significant influence over the activities of the remaining seven properties, we do not have a controlling financial interest in them. Accordingly, all of our real estate investments in these properties are reported under the equity method of accounting pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our joint ventures recognize revenues from rents and tenant reimbursements in the same manner as discussed in the “Revenue Recognition” section above and account for real estate acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, as discussed in the “Real Estate Acquisitions” section below.

We review our investments in non-consolidated entities for other-than-temporary impairment. Accordingly, we review the investments held by the underlying investee entities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an impairment in value occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the investment, with the carrying value of the individual investment. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors which require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each investment. As discussed in Note 4, our Woodlake Square property recorded an impairment during the year ended December 31, 2010. Our portion of such impairment was approximately $185,000 and was recorded in equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries. No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008.

- 25 -

Table of Contents

Valuation of Receivables

We determine an appropriate allowance for the uncollectible portion of tenant receivables and accounts receivable based upon an analysis of balances outstanding, historical payment history, tenant credit worthiness, additional guarantees and other economic trends. Balances outstanding include base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributed to the accrual of straight line rents. Additionally, we consider estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims with respect to tenants in bankruptcy in our assessment of the likelihood of collecting the related receivables.

Real Estate Acquisitions

We account for real estate acquisitions pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations. We expense acquisition costs associated with operating properties as incurred. We capitalize costs associated with pending acquisitions of raw land as incurred. Such costs are expensed if and when such land acquisition becomes no longer probable. Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of the acquired properties to land, building and improvements, identifiable intangible assets and to the acquired liabilities based on their respective fair values. Identifiable intangibles include amounts allocated to acquired above and below market leases, the value of in-place leases and customer relationships, if any.

We determine fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic conditions that may affect the property.

Factors considered by management in our analysis of determining the as-if-vacant property value include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, tenant demand and other economic conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related expenses. Intangibles related to above market leases and in-place lease value are recorded as acquired lease intangibles and are amortized as an adjustment to rental revenue or amortization expense, as appropriate, over the remaining terms of the underlying leases. Below market lease amortization includes fixed-rate renewal periods. Any premiums or discounts on acquired out-of-market debt are amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of such debt.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) amended the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities in ASC 810, Consolidation. The amendments will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities–an interpretation of ARB No. 51, and changes the way entities account for securitizations and variable interest entities as a result of the elimination of the Qualified Special Purpose Entity (“QSPE”) concept in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.166. We adopted the provisions of ASC 810 on January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 167 did not have an effect on our results of operations or financial position.

- 26 -

Table of Contents

Factors Which May Influence Results of Operations

Rental Income

The amount of rental income generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease currently available space and space available from unscheduled lease terminations at levels not less than the existing rental rates. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect our rental income in future periods.

Scheduled Lease Expirations

During 2011, 3.8% of the total square footage of our consolidated properties expires, and 22.8% of the total square footage of our non-consolidated properties expires. Our leasing strategy for 2011 focuses on negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to expire during the year and identifying new tenants or existing tenants seeking additional space to occupy the square footage for which we are unable to negotiate such renewals.

Results of Operations

We commenced our principal operations on June 30, 2005, when we raised the minimum offering of $2.0 million pursuant to the terms of our Offering Memorandum and issued the initial 80 Units to investors. During 2005, we acquired one interest in a property through a consolidated joint venture on September 30, 2005 and acquired a direct interest in another property on December 12, 2005. During 2006, we acquired direct interests in two additional properties, one on June 30, 2006 and the other on September 29, 2006. In 2006, we also made investments in three joint ventures through which we obtained an ownership interest in five other properties. During 2007, we made investments in two other joint ventures through which we obtained an ownership interest in two additional properties. During 2008, we made an investment in one additional property through an existing joint venture and acquired an additional equity interest in another existing joint venture. We made no additional acquisitions of properties during 2009 or 2010. Our direct property acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and the results of their operations are included in our consolidated financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition. With the exception of our investment in Market at Lake Houston, LP, which we consolidate into our financial statements, we report our investments in joint ventures under the equity method of accounting given our ability to exercise significant influence over them.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2010 to the year ended December 31, 2009

Revenue. Revenue decreased approximately $617,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($6.2 million in 2010 versus $6.8 million in 2009). This decrease was due to the lease expiration of DSW on our Westside Plaza property and due to the move outs of Blockbuster on our Lantern Lane and Olmos Creek properties during the 2010 period. Also, a decrease in recoverable property tax expenses resulted in a corresponding decrease in expense recoveries billed to our tenants.

Property Expense. Property expense decreased approximately $290,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($1.6 million in 2010 versus $1.9 million in 2009). This decrease was primarily due to a 2009 property tax refund received during the 2010 period for our Lantern Lane property, as well as a reduction in property taxes for the 2010 tax year.

Property Management Fees – Related Party. Property management fees decreased approximately $49,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($248,000 in 2010 versus $297,000 in 2009). Property management fees are calculated based on tenant billings. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in expense recoveries that were billed to tenants during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased approximately $213,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($2.4 million in 2010 versus $2.6 million in 2009). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and in-place leases as a substantial portion of those costs were written off due to tenant vacancies during the 2009 period.

- 27 -

Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased approximately $29,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($8,000 in 2010 versus $37,000 in 2009). This decrease resulted from a lower outstanding balance on the note receivable from our joint venture partner on our investment in 5433 Westheimer, L.P. That note was paid in full during 2009. Interest income earned during the year ended December 31, 2010 was limited to interest earned on deposit accounts.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $109,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($3.2 million in 2010 versus $3.1 million in 2009). This increase resulted from interest accrued on borrowings from affiliates of our General Partner.

Equity in Losses from Non-consolidated Entities. Equity in losses from non-consolidated entities increased approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($3.6 million in 2010 versus $1.6 million in 2009). These amounts represent our ownership portion of our joint ventures’ net income or loss for the period. The increased loss is due to increased depreciation expense resulting from the redevelopment project at our Woodlake Square property. Our joint venture reassessed and shortened the estimated useful lives of various buildings consistent with the demolition of such buildings as part of the redevelopment.

Net Loss Attributable to Non-controlling Interest. Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest decreased approximately $51,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 ($43,000 in 2010 versus $94,000 in 2009). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the loss recorded at our Lake Houston property resulting from increased revenues from a new tenant and a decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2009 to the year ended December 31, 2008

Revenue. Revenue decreased approximately $413,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($6.8 million in 2009 versus $7.3 million in 2008). This decrease was due to tenant vacancies at Lake Houston and Olmos creek as well as a decrease in property taxes at Lantern Lane and Westside Plaza which led to a reduction in tenant recoveries at both properties.

General and Administrative. General and administrative fees decreased approximately $67,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($97,000 in 2009 versus $164,000 in 2008). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in marketing and conference expenses as well as cost savings initiatives implemented by our General Partner and its affiliates.

General and Administrative – Related Party. General and administrative – related party expenses paid to our affiliate increased approximately $157,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($459,000 in 2009 versus $302,000 in 2008). This increase was due to an increase in the compensation pool and to an increase in the allocation of those costs during the period to better reflect the level of effort expended by our affiliate’s financial personnel in providing accounting and financial reporting services to us.

Property Management Fees – Related Party. Property management fees increased approximately $47,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($297,000 in 2009 versus $250,000 in 2008). Property management fees are calculated based on tenant billings. This increase is primarily due to common area maintenance (“CAM”) true-up recoveries that were billed to tenants during the first quarter of 2009.

Legal and Professional Fees. Legal and professional fees decreased approximately $124,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($239,000 in 2009 versus $363,000 in 2008). This decrease was due to a reduction in forfeited costs associated with potential property acquisitions. We incurred no such costs during 2009 as we were not actively seeking acquisition opportunities.

- 28 -

Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased approximately $352,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($37,000 in 2009 versus $389,000 in 2008). This decrease resulted from a lower outstanding balance on the note receivable from our joint venture partner on our investment in 5433 Westheimer, L.P. (see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). The note was repaid in full during 2009.

Equity in Losses from Non-consolidated Entities. Equity in losses from non-consolidated entities decreased approximately $266,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($1.6 million in 2009 versus $1.8 million in 2008). This loss represents our ownership portion of our joint ventures’ net income or loss for the period, such loss being driven primarily by depreciation and amortization charges. The decrease in losses is being driven primarily by our Woodlake Square and 5433 Westheimer properties. The interest rate swap entered into by AmREIT Woodlake Square, L.P. was not considered a hedge for accounting purposes until the fourth quarter of 2008 (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements). Prior to then, our share of changes in the fair value of the swap were included in income. During 2009, changes in the fair value were included in other comprehensive loss on our consolidated statements of partners’ capital. We also completed construction of a hotel at our 5433 Westheimer property, which has improved the performance of the property.

Net Loss Attributable to Non-controlling Interest. Non-controlling interest in loss of consolidated subsidiaries increased approximately $35,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 ($94,000 in 2009 versus $59,000 in 2008). Non-controlling interest in loss of consolidated subsidiaries represents the 40% ownership interest that one of our affiliated investment funds has in a real estate partnership that we consolidate as a result of our controlling financial interest in such partnership. The partnership investment was made in December 2005 concurrent with the acquisition of The Market at Lake Houston. This increase was primarily due to an increase in amortization of in-place leases related to a tenant vacancy as well as increased property expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We expect to meet our liquidity requirements through cash on-hand, net cash provided by distributions from joint ventures, proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks and other lenders, the selective and strategic sale of properties and net cash flows from operations. We expect that our primary uses of capital will be for investment in real estate properties and related improvements, the payment of operating expenses, including interest expense on any outstanding indebtedness, and the payment of distributions to our Partners made available from sales of properties. As we sell properties during our operating period, we plan to strategically reinvest the proceeds from such sales rather than distributing the proceeds to our Partners. In February 2011, we sold our Market at Lake Houston property to AmREIT for net cash proceeds of $2.7 million.

The United States has undergone and may continue to experience economic weakness that has been marked by pervasive and fundamental disruptions in the financial markets. Continued concerns regarding the uncertainty of whether the U.S. economy will be adversely affected by inflation, deflation or stagflation and the systemic impact of increased unemployment, volatile energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market and a severely distressed real estate market have contributed to increased market volatility and weakened business and consumer confidence. The United States may not experience a sustained recovery and could suffer pronounced instability and decreased economic activity for an extended period of time. Our operations are sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact our tenants, including, among other things, increased bad debts due to such recessionary pressures. A general reduction in the level of tenant leasing or shifts in tenant leasing practices could adversely affect our revenues, profitability and results of operations. It is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the financial market problems and the many ways in which they may affect our tenants and our business in general. A significant additional deterioration in the U.S. economy or the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more of our significant tenants could cause our cash resources to be insufficient to meet our obligations over the next 12 months. Effective July 15, 2009, we suspended all distributions in an effort to conserve cash and to protect partners’ invested capital. As we have several projects that are mid-stream in redevelopment, we are conserving cash from operations to improve our ability to fund capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, and to meet our obligations, including debt service. We believe that the economy and real estate market may recover prior to our anticipated liquidation commencement date of October 31, 2012. However, if the economy remains in a protracted recession, we may seek to postpone liquidation if we believe such liquidation is not in the best interests of the Partners at that time.

- 29 -

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, our cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $2.6 million and approximately $3.3 million, respectively. Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):


	2010			2009			2008

Operating activities	$	177		$	2,338		$	971
Investing activities		337			(806	)		894
Financing activities		(1,165	)		847			(6,192	)

Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash flows provided by operating activities decreased approximately $2.2 million ($177,000 of cash provided by operating activities during the 2010 period versus $2.3 million during the same period in 2009). This decrease in cash flows was primarily due to the collection of accounts receivable – related party during the first quarter of 2009 for amounts that had been advanced during 2008. We had no such collections in 2010. In addition, cash collections from tenants decreased as a result of the timing of property tax recovery payments from our anchor tenants. The 2008 property tax recoveries were collected during the first quarter of 2009 while the 2009 property tax recoveries were billed and collected during the fourth quarter of 2009. Net cash flows provided by operating activities also decreased as a result of the timing of property tax payments. We deferred payment of 2009 property taxes for three of our properties until the first quarter of 2010. In 2009, we deferred payment for only two properties.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we received $897,000 in distributions from our non-consolidated joint venture entities compared to $173,000 during the same period in 2009. The increase in 2010 was primarily attributable to a $573,000 distribution we received from our Woodlake Square investment which resulted from the sale of 90% of our interest to a new joint venture partner. Additionally, we invested $435,000 in our non-consolidated joint ventures during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.2 million during the same period in 2009. Investments were lower in 2010 due to reduced working capital needs at our Casa Linda property, as that property has moved out of the redevelopment phase. The increase in cash from the reduction of investments and the increase in distributions received was offset by a decrease of $334,000 in payments received on notes receivable as the note was paid in full in December 2009.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we made net repayments on notes payable – related party of $1.0 million compared to net borrowings of $2.5 million during the 2009 period. During 2010, we had cash savings of $1.3 million due to the suspension of all distribution and redemption payments beginning July 2009.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2010, we had the following contractual debt obligations (see also Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding the specific terms of our debt) (in thousands):

- 30 -

Table of Contents


Scheduled payments by year	Principal		Loan maturities			Interest		Total payments
2011	$	175	$	24,615	(1)	$	2,818	$	27,608
2012		183		—			1,524		1,707
2013		196		—			1,508		1,704
2014		207		—			1,497		1,704
Thereafter		92		24,904			1,278		26,274
Total	$	853	$	49,519		$	8,625	$	58,997

(1)

The $24.6 million in debt maturities in 2011 consists of a $13.4 million mortgage on our Lantern Lane property which matures in September 2011 and a $11.2 million mortgage on our Olmos Creek property that matures in December 2011. In each case, we believe that we will be able to extend the mortgage with the current lender, refinance with a new lender, or dispose of the property in an orderly sale prior to the maturity date. If we are unable to extend or refinance the mortgage, we may be forced to sell the properties at a time when it is disadvantageous to do so, and such disposal could result in a loss.

We invest any excess cash in short-term investments. This investment strategy allows us to offset a portion of the interest costs from our fixed-rate mortgage loans and provides us with the liquidity to acquire properties at such time as those suitable for acquisition are located.

Indemnification of General Partner

The Partnership Agreement provides for indemnification of our General Partner for liabilities incurred by or claims made against our General Partner or its employees or agents in connection with business on our behalf, provided that our General Partner determined in good faith that the conduct which gave rise to the liabilities or claims was within the scope of our General Partner’s authority and was taken to promote our best interests. Amounts to be indemnified include judgments, fines, settlements, litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees, which may be paid as incurred. Only assets of the Partnership may be reached to indemnify our General Partner, its employees or agents. To the extent that this indemnification applies to liabilities under the Securities Act, such indemnification is contrary to public policy and therefore unenforceable.

Conflicts of Interest

Our General Partner is subsidiary of AmREIT, Inc., an SEC reporting, non-traded Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust. Affiliates of AmREIT act as sponsor, general partner or advisor to various private real estate programs. As such, there are conflicts of interest where AmREIT or its affiliates, while serving in the capacity as sponsor, general partner or advisor for another AmREIT-sponsored program, may be in competition with us in connection with property acquisitions, property dispositions and property management. The compensation arrangements between affiliates of AmREIT and these other AmREIT real estate programs could influence our General Partner’s management of us. See “Item 1. Business – Conflicts of Interest” above.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2010.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

- 31 -

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPLEMENTARY DATA

Our consolidated financial statements, including notes thereto, and the report of independent auditors are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning at page F-1 and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our General Partner’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2010. Based on that evaluation, our General Partner’s CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in causing material information relating to us to be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported by management on a timely basis and to ensure the quality and timeliness of our public disclosures in accordance with SEC disclosure obligations.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our General Partner and its affiliates maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, which is a process designed under the supervision of the AmREIT principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by AmREIT’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:


	•	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

	•	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund III, Ltd. and its subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of our General Partner; and

	•	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and, with the participation of AmREIT’s CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of AmREIT’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, we believe that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2010.

- 32 -

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Controls

There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Pursuant to the definitive consent solicitation statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on January 24, 2011, on behalf of our General Partner, we voluntarily solicited the consent of our Limited Partners to the proposed sale of a shopping center property known as “The Market at Lake Houston” to our affiliate AmREIT. The property, a 101,799 square foot grocery-anchored shopping center situated on 13.86 acres in Atascocita, Texas, a northern suburb of Houston, Texas, was built in 2001 and 2002 and is 100% leased and occupied. The anchor tenant is H-E-B Grocery and other major tenants include Five Guys Burgers, Payless ShoeSource and Subway. Prior to the sale, we owned 60% of the property and AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund, Ltd. (“MIG”) owned the remaining 40% of the property.

AmREIT owns 100% of our General Partner and the general partner of MIG. For any property that is sold by us to AmREIT, the transaction must be completed at fair market value pursuant to an independent appraisal process. While consent of our Limited Partners was not required by our Agreement of Limited Partnership or by Texas state law, our General Partner believed it to be in our best interest and the interest of our Limited Partners to voluntarily seek and procure the affirmative consent of our Limited Partners. The board of directors of AmREIT appointed two separate committees of its board of directors to represent its interests and the interests of us and MIG, respectively, in the transaction. Each committee was comprised of three independent directors from the board of directors of AmREIT and was led by an independent director who has substantial expertise in valuing commercial real estate. Each committee engaged its own independent, nationally-known appraiser. If the two appraised values were within five percent of each other, then the market value of the property would be deemed to be the average of the two appraisals. If the two appraisals were more than five percent apart, then a third appraiser would be appointed by the two existing appraisers.

On February 23, 2011, the consent solicitation expired, and our Limited Partners approved of the sale of The Market at Lake Houston to AmREIT. The following are the results for the solicitation of consents:

Consents	Withheld Consents
1,575.6 Units	35.5 Units

Based upon the number of Limited Partner consents and as a result of the appraisal process, effective as of February 25, 2011, we completed the sale of the property to AmREIT pursuant to a Sales Contract (the “Sales Contract”) for a combination of cash and the assumption of $15.7 million of our mortgage debt, which matures on January 1, 2016 and is payable interest-only at a fixed rate of 5.75% per year. The Sales Contract contains customary affirmative and negative covenants which are typical of sales contracts generally entered into by us in the ordinary course of business. The foregoing description of the Sales Contract does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Sales Contract, which is filed as Exhibit 10.17 to this Annual Report and incorporated by reference herein.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We have no directors or executive officers. We are managed by our General Partner, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation. Our General Partner does not have any employees and relies upon the personnel of AmREIT and its affiliates to perform services for us. Our Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership will continue until December 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the officers and director of our General Partner, all of whom are officers of AmREIT and are expected to make a significant contribution to us.


Name	Age	Position
H. Kerr Taylor	60	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Chad C. Braun	38	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Brett P. Treadwell	41	Managing Vice President – Finance

H. Kerr Taylor serves as our General Partner’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, and has served in this capacity since the formation of the Partnership. He is the founder of AmREIT and serves as its Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Taylor has guided the growth of AmREIT and its predecessors for over 27 years. His primary responsibilities include overseeing strategic initiatives as well as building, mentoring and leading AmREIT’s team of professionals. Mr. Taylor has over 31 years of experience within the real estate industry. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Trinity University, a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Southern Methodist University and his law degree from South Texas College of Law. Mr. Taylor is chairman of the board of Pathways for Little Feet and serves as a board member of Life House, Inc., Uptown District and as an Elder of First Presbyterian Church. Mr. Taylor is a lifetime member of the International Council of Shopping Centers and Urban Land Institute and is a member of the Texas Bar Association.

Mr. Taylor was selected and is qualified to serve as the sole director or our General Partner because of his intimate knowledge of AmREIT and its affiliated companies and his extensive experience within the real estate industry.

- 33 -

Table of Contents

Chad C. Braun serves as our General Partner’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, and has served in this capacity since the formation of the Partnership. He also serves in this same position for AmREIT. Mr. Braun is responsible for corporate finance, equity capital markets, debt structuring and placement, investor relations, accounting and SEC reporting, and he oversees investment sponsorship and product creation. Mr. Braun has over 16 years of accounting, financial and real estate experience. Prior to joining AmREIT in 1999, he served as a manager in the real estate advisory services group at Ernst & Young LLP. He has provided extensive consulting and audit services to a number of REITs and private real estate companies, including financial statement audits, portfolio acquisition and disposition, portfolio management, merger integration and process improvement, financial analysis and capital markets and restructuring transactions. Mr. Braun received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and Finance from Hardin Simmons University and subsequently earned the CPA designation and his Series 63, 7, 24 and 27 securities licenses. He is a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Brett P. Treadwell serves as our General Partner’s Managing Vice President — Finance and has served in this capacity since the formation of the Partnership. He also serves in this position for AmREIT. Within AmREIT he is responsible for its financial reporting function as well as for assisting in the establishment and execution of AmREIT’s strategic financial initiatives. Mr. Treadwell’s responsibilities also include overall risk management and treasury management functions and SEC reporting as well as periodic internal reporting to management. Mr. Treadwell has over 19 years of accounting, financial and SEC reporting experience, and, prior to joining AmREIT in August 2004, served as a senior manager with Arthur Andersen LLP and then with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Treadwell received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Baylor University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) of the Exchange Act during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we know of no reporting person who has failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above forms, any report required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Code of Ethics

We are managed by our General Partner, and we have no officers or employees to whom a Code of Ethics would apply.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are managed by our General Partner, and we have no directors or executive officers to whom we pay compensation.

See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” below for the fees and expenses we pay to our General Partner and its affiliates.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have any compensation plans under which we are authorized to issue equity securities.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

We know of no person (including a “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who is the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Units.

We have no officers or directors. Our General Partner owns our sole general partner interest and also owns limited partner Units in us. No person who is an officer of our General Partner as of the date of this filing owns any direct interest in us. None of the officers of our General Partner own any of our Units. AmREIT, the sole shareholder of our General Partner, has assigned the economic interest in 28.5% of our General Partner to certain of its management team. The address of the officers of our General Partner is 8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046.

As of March 31, 2011, there were 2,833 Units owned by 1,161 investors.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Compensation Arrangements

Our General Partner and its affiliates received the payments and fees from us described below. These payments and fees were not negotiated and may be higher than payments and fees that would have resulted from an arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated entity.

- 34 -

Table of Contents

In addition to the fees noted below, the non-consolidated entities in which we own an investment paid property management, leasing, development, and construction management fees of $1.2 million to one of our affiliated entities for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Our Casa Linda property paid a total of $6.2 million in construction costs to an affiliated entity who acted as a general contractor on the redevelopment during 2008 and 2009.


Type and Recipient	Determination of Amount	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
	Organization Stage

Organizational and Offering Cost Reimbursements	Reimbursement of the Partnership’s organizational and offering costs, including legal and accounting fees, printing costs, filing fees and distribution costs.	No amount to report	No amount to report

	Operating Stage

Asset Management Fee – General Partner	A monthly fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of net invested capital under management for accounting related services, investor relations, facilitating the deployment of capital, and other services provided by our General Partner to us.	$617,753	$617,753

Development and Acquisition Fees – General Partner	Between 4.0% and 6.0% of project costs depending on the size and the scope of the development.	No amount to report	No amount to report
Property Management and Leasing Fees – ARIC	Property management fees not to exceed 4.0% of the gross rentals for providing management, operating, maintenance and other services. Leasing fees not to exceed 2.0% of base rent on a lease renewal and 6.0% of base rent on an initial lease for procuring tenants and negotiating the terms of the tenant leases.	$338,487	$368,995

Reimbursement of Operating Expenses – General Partner	We reimburse the actual expenses incurred by our General Partner in connection with its provision of administrative services, including related personnel costs.	$437,473	$459,408

Financing Fees – General Partner	1.0% of the loan proceeds for procuring debt financing for us.	No amount to report	No amount to report

- 35 -

Table of Contents


Type and Recipient	Determination of Amount	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

Distributions During Operating Stage – General Partner	Our General Partner is entitled to monthly distributions during our operating period, in an amount equal to 1.0% of the each distribution made to the Partners.	No amount to report	$13,000

Real Estate Brokerage Commissions – General Partner or its affiliate(1)	Up to 6.0% of the sales price on co-brokered transactions and not to exceed 4.0% of the sales price on individually brokered transactions. Additionally, our General Partner and its affiliates will not be paid real estate brokerage commissions on the sale of a property if the property being sold has not generated an annual return of at least 10.0% per annum on the equity contributed to such property and if, in the aggregate, all of our properties that we have sold have not generated a property level return of at least 10.0% per annum on the equity contributed. No brokerage commission will be payable on sales of properties to AmREIT or its affiliates.	No amount to report	No amount to report

	Liquidating Stage

Distributions of Net Cash Flow – General Partner	Our General Partner is entitled to distributions after our operating period. Distributions of net cash after our operating period will be distributed 1% to our General Partner and 99% to our Limited Partners until our Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions equal to 100% of their invested capital plus an amount equal to 10% per annum uncompounded on their adjusted capital. At such time, our General Partner will receive 100% of distributions made until our General Partner has received cumulative distributions in an amount equal to 40% of net cash flow paid to date of our Limited Partners in excess of their invested capital. Thereafter, our General Partner will receive 40% of distributions and our Limited Partners will receive 60% of distributions.	No amount to report	No amount to report



(1)	Although we are most likely to pay real estate brokerage commissions in the event of our liquidation, these fees may also be earned during our operational stage.

- 36 -

Table of Contents

Joint Ventures with Affiliates

As of December 31, 2010, we had entered into five joint ventures with our affiliates.

In December 2005, we acquired a 60% interest in AmREIT Lake Houston, LP, which owns the multi-tenant retail property The Market at Lake Houston. The remaining 40% is owned by AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund, Ltd., our affiliate. In February 2011, we sold the Market at Lake Houston property to AmREIT for a combination of cash and the assumption of $15.7 million of our mortgage debt.The acquisition was subject to the appraisal process set forth in “Item 1. Business – Disposition Policies – AmREIT’s Purchase Rights.”

In December 2006, we acquired a 50% interest in AmREIT Casa Linda, LP, which owns Casa Linda Plaza, the multi-tenant retail property in Dallas, Texas. The remaining 50% is owned by AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., our affiliate.

In August 2007, we acquired a 30% interest in AmREIT Woodlake, LP, which owns Woodlake Square, the multi-tenant retail property in Houston, Texas. The remaining 70% is 40% owned by AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., our affiliate, and 30% owned by AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation, our affiliate.

In July 2010, we and our affiliated partners of AmREIT Woodlake, LP entered into a joint venture with a third-party institutional partner wherein the partner acquired a 90% interest in the joint venture. The sale to AEW generated $3.4 million in cash. In connection with the transaction with AEW, we refinanced the Woodlake Square loan with Frost which was due to mature in September 2010 with US Bank. As a result of this transaction, we now hold a 3% interest in Woodlake Square, which carries a promoted interest in profits and cash flows once an 11.65% return is met on the project. AmREIT Woodlake, LP recorded an impairment for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our portion of such impairment was $185,000 and has been recorded in equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries in our consolidated statements of operations. We will continue to account for this investment using the equity method.

In November 2007, we acquired a 30% interest in AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, LP, which owns Woodlake Pointe, a multi-tenant retail property in Houston, Texas. The remaining 70% is 40% owned by AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P., our affiliate, and 30% owned by AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation, our affiliate.

In May 2008, we acquired a 30% interest in a tract of land adjacent to Woodlake Pointe. The remaining 70% is owned by AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P. (40%) and by AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation (30%). The acquisition is accounted for as part of Westheimer Gessner, L.P.

Directors

We have no directors and are managed by our General Partner. H. Kerr Taylor is the sole director of our General Partner.

- 37 -

Table of Contents

Loan to an Affiliate

During 2007, we loaned $7.0 million to 5433 Westheimer, L.P., a joint venture entity in which we own a 57.5% interest. During 2008, the property was refinanced with a third-party lender in connection with the planned redevelopment. In conjunction with that refinancing, the $7.0 million note payable due to us was converted to equity in order to meet the lender’s equity contribution requirement of approximately $10.0 million. We established a note receivable with our joint venture partner for its portion of the additional equity contribution ($3.5 million). $800,000 of that note was converted into an additional 7.5% equity interest in the joint venture in 2008. The balance of the note was paid in full in 2009.

Loans from Affiliates

During 2009, we borrowed $2.5 million from affiliates of our General Partner in order to meet a guaranty agreement that required us, as guarantor of the mortgage of one of our affiliates, to maintain $3.0 million in liquid assets. Upon evidencing such liquidity and attaining substantial completion of the hotel, the lender decreased the requirement to $1.5 million. During 2010, we repaid $1.0 million of the $2.5 million.

AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation

ARIC is a fully integrated real estate development and operating business which is wholly owned by AmREIT, the parent of our General Partner. ARIC employs a full complement of brokers and real estate professionals who provide development, acquisition, brokerage, leasing, construction management, asset and property management services to AmREIT affiliated entities and to third parties. ARIC serves as one of our property managers, and is responsible for managing and leasing some of our properties. We pay ARIC property management and leasing fees as described above under “Item 1. Business.” ARIC hires, directs and establishes policies for employees who will have direct responsibility for the operations of each property it manages, which may include but is not limited to on-site managers and building and maintenance personnel. Certain employees of the property manager may be employed on a part-time basis and may also be employed by our General Partner or its affiliates. ARIC also directs the purchase of equipment and supplies and supervises all maintenance activity. The management fee paid to ARIC covers all of its general overhead costs.

We have historically engaged AmREIT Construction Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARIC, to provide construction and construction management services for our development and redevelopment projects. During 2008, AmREIT Construction Company ceased providing these services although it will see through to completion all work currently in process. We may engage ARIC in the future for construction management services. In these cases, such services are provided on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than can be obtained from independent third parties for comparable services in the same location.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

KPMG, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm and certified public accountants (“KPMG”), served as our independent accountants for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The following is an explanation of the fees billed to us by KPMG for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us for professional services related to the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q, or other services normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 totaled $130,500 and $133,000 respectively. Included in these amounts are $17,000 and $23,000 related to Sarbanes-Oxley testing fees for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

- 38 -

Table of Contents

Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees

The services that have been performed by KPMG have been limited to audit related services. Accordingly, we have paid no non-audit related fees, tax fees or other fees to KPMG for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Company does not have an independent audit committee. Our General Partner must approve any services to be performed by our independent auditors.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


1.	Financial Statements. The list of our financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on page F-1.

2.	Financial Statement Schedules. The list of our financial statement schedules filed as part of this Annual Report is set forth on page F-1.

3.	Exhibits.

It is inappropriate for readers to assume the accuracy of, or rely upon any covenants, representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as Exhibits to, or incorporated by reference in, this report. Any such covenants, representations or warranties may have been qualified or superseded by disclosures contained in separate schedules or exhibits not filed with or incorporated by reference in this report, may reflect the parties’ negotiated risk allocation in the particular transaction, may be qualified by materiality standards that differ from those applicable for securities law purposes, and may not be true as of the date of this report or any other date and may be subject to waivers by any or all of the parties. Where exhibits and schedules to agreements filed or incorporated by reference as Exhibits hereto are not included in these exhibits, such exhibits and schedules to agreements are not included or incorporated by reference herein.

The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit
Number

Description

Form

File
Number

Exhibit

Filing
Date

Filed
Herewith

3.1

Certificate of Limited Partnership of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd., dated April 19, 2005.

10-SB

000-52619

3.1

4/30/2007

3.2

Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmREIT Monthly & Income Growth Fund III, Ltd., dated April 19, 2005, between AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation and AmREIT, the initial limited partner.

10-SB

000-52619

3.1

4/30/2007

10.1

Fixed Rate Note (A Loan), dated May 2, 2005, between Shafer Plaza I, Ltd and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

10-SB

000-52619

10.1

4/30/2007

10.2

Fixed Rate Note (B Loan), dated May 2, 2005, between Shafer Plaza I, Ltd and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

10-SB

000-52619

10.2

4/30/2007

- 39 -

Table of Contents


		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	File Number	Exhibit	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
10.3	Loan and Assumption Agreement, dated September 30, 2005, among AmREIT Westside Plaza, LP, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd., AmREIT, Shafer Plaza I, Ltd., Steven G. Shafer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and CBA-Mezzanine Capital Finance, LLC.	10-SB	000-52619	10.3	4/30/2007

10.4	Second Amended and Restated Property Management and Leasing Agreement, dated December 28, 2005, between AmREIT Westside Plaza, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.	10-SB	000-52619	10.4	4/30/2007

10.5	Management and Leasing Agreement, dated November 22, 2005, between AmREIT Lake Houston, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.	10-SB	000-52619	10.5	4/30/2007

10.6	Promissory Note, dated December 12, 2005, between AmREIT Lake Houston, LP and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc.	10-SB	000-52619	10.6	4/30/2007

10.7	Commercial Property Management and Leasing Agreement, dated March 30, 2006, between 5433 Westheimer, LP and Songy Partners Limited.	10-SB	000-52619	10.7	4/30/2007

10.8	Promissory Note, dated September 28, 2006, between AmREIT Lantern Lane, LP and Differential Development — 1994, Ltd.	10-SB	000-52619	10.8	4/30/2007

10.9	Management and Leasing Agreement, dated September 28, 2006, between AmREIT Lantern Lane, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.	10-SB	000-52619	10.9	4/30/2007

10.10	Promissory Note, dated December 8, 2006, between AmREIT Casa Linda, LP and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc.	10-SB	000-52619	10.10	4/30/2007

10.11	Secured Promissory Note, dated September 29, 2006, between AmREIT Olmos Creek, LP and NLI Commercial Mortgage Fund, LLC.	10-SB	000-52619	10.11	4/30/2007

- 40 -

Table of Contents

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit
Number

Description

Form

File
Number

Exhibit

Filing
Date

Filed
Herewith

10.12

Management and Leasing Agreement, dated January 26, 2007, between AmREIT Olmos Creek, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.

10-SB

000-52619

10.12

4/30/2007

10.13

Management and Leasing Agreement, dated December 7, 2006, between AmREIT SSPF Preston Towne Crossing, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.

10-SB

000-52619

10.13

4/30/2007

10.14

Management and Leasing Agreement, dated December 7, 2006, between AmREIT SSPF Berkeley, LP and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.

10-SB

000-52619

10.14

4/30/2007

10.15

Loan Assumption Agreement, dated December 7, 2006, among Berkeley Center, Ltd., William Hutchinson, AmREIT SSPF Berkeley, LP, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd. and LaSalle Bank National Association.

10-SB

000-52619

10.15

4/30/2007

10.16

Loan Assumption Agreement, dated December 7, 2006, among PTC Dunhill Holdings, Ltd., William Hutchinson, AmREIT SSPF Preston Towne Crossing, LP, AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd. and LaSalle Bank National Association.

10-SB

000-52619

10.16

4/30/2007

10.17

Real Estate Sales Contract, effective as of January 14, 2011, between AmREIT Lake Houston, L.P., and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation.

31.1

Certification of H. Kerr Taylor pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chad C. Braun pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of H. Kerr Taylor pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chad C. Braun pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

- 41 -

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd.

	By:	AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, its General Partner

Date: March 31, 2011

	By:	/s/ H. Kerr Taylor
		H. Kerr Taylor
		President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

	By:	/s/ Chad C. Braun
		Chad C. Braun
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

- 42 -

Table of Contents

PART F/S

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME AND GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


		Page
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:

Schedule III – Consolidated Real Estate Owned and Accumulated Depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2010		S-1

All other financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information is either inapplicable or is included in the financial statements or related notes.

F-1

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners
AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund III, Ltd.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund III, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the related financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and related schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As such, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund III, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 31, 2011

F-2

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for unit data)


	December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Real estate investments at cost:
Land	$	18,446		$	18,446
Buildings		47,308			47,295
Tenant improvements		957			983
		66,711			66,724
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(8,372	)		(6,691	)
		58,339			60,033

Investment in non-consolidated entities		22,190			26,212
Acquired lease intangibles, net		1,285			1,804
Net real estate investments		81,814			88,049

Cash and cash equivalents		2,646			3,297
Tenant receivables, net		471			367
Accounts receivable - related party		163			132
Deferred costs, net		463			522
Other assets		642			706
TOTAL ASSETS	$	86,199		$	93,073

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Notes payable	$	50,372		$	50,537
Notes payable - related party		2,556			2,907
Accounts payable and other liabilities		1,235			1,292
Accounts payable - related party		30			10
Acquired below-market lease intangibles, net		181			324
Security deposits		164			125
TOTAL LIABILITIES		54,538			55,195

Capital:
Partners’ capital:
General partner		—			—
Limited partners, 2,833 units outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009		30,385			36,638
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		—			(79	)
TOTAL PARTNERS’ CAPITAL		30,385			36,559

Non-controlling interest		1,276			1,319
TOTAL CAPITAL		31,661			37,878
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL	$	86,199		$	93,073

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands, except for per unit data)


	2010			2009			2008
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases	$	6,222		$	6,839		$	7,252
Total revenues		6,222			6,839			7,252

Expenses:
General and administrative		109			97			164
General and administrative - related party		437			459			302
Asset management fees - related party		618			618			618
Property expense		1,589			1,879			1,946
Property management fees - related party		248			297			250
Legal and professional		232			239			363
Depreciation and amortization		2,365			2,578			2,598
Total operating expenses		5,598			6,167			6,241

Operating income		624			672			1,011

Other income (expense):
Interest and other income		8			37			418
Interest expense		(3,255	)		(3,146	)		(3,114	)
Equity in losses from non-consolidated entities		(3,639	)		(1,570	)		(1,836	)
Margin tax expense		(34	)		(26	)		(52	)
Total other expense		(6,920	)		(4,705	)		(4,584	)


Net loss, including non-controlling interest		(6,296	)		(4,033	)		(3,573	)

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		43			94			59
Net loss attributable to partners	$	(6,253	)	$	(3,939	)	$	(3,514	)

Weighted average units outstanding		2,833			2,833			2,842
Net loss per unit	$	(2,207.20	)	$	(1,390.40	)	$	(1,236.45	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(in thousands)


	Partners’ Capital
	General Partner			Limited Partners			Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)			Non-controlling interest			Total
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	—		$	50,961		$	—		$	2,146		$	53,107
Redemptions		—			(207	)		—			—			(207	)
Offering costs		—			(1	)		—			—			(1	)
Net loss (1)		54			(3,568	)		—			(59	)		(3,573	)
Distributions		(54	)		(5,328	)		—			(457	)		(5,839	)
Decrease in fair value of derivative		—			—			(253	)		—			(253	)
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	—		$	41,857		$	(253	)	$	1,630		$	43,234

Redemptions		—			(28	)		—			—			(28	)
Net loss (1)		13			(3,952	)		—			(94	)		(4,033	)
Distributions		(13	)		(1,239	)		—			(217	)		(1,469	)
Increase in fair value of derivative		—			—			174			—			174
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	—		$	36,638		$	(79	)	$	1,319		$	37,878

Net loss (1)		—			(6,253	)		—			(43	)		(6,296	)
Increase in fair value of derivative		—			—			79			—			79
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	30,385		$	—		$	1,276		$	31,661


(1)	The allocation of net loss includes a curative allocation to increase the General Partner capital account by $62, $52 and $89 for the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods. The cumulative curative allocation since inception of the Partnership is $321. The Partnership Agreement provides that no Partner shall be required to fund a deficit balance in their capital account.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands)


	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss, including non-controlling interest	$	(6,296	)	$	(4,033	)	$	(3,573	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in losses from non-consolidated entities		3,639			1,570			1,836
Depreciation and amortization		2,365			2,578			2,598
Amortization of above- and below-market leases, net		(95	)		(139	)		(120	)
Amortization of loan acquisition costs		75			76			76
Bad debt expense		200			155			25
Decrease (increase) in tenant receivables		(304	)		370			(287	)
Increase in accounts receivable		—			2			7
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable - related party		(31	)		1,161			1,025
Increase in deferred costs		(91	)		(72	)		(128	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets		64			130			(209	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities		(57	)		237			(223	)
Increase in accounts payable - related party		669			311			(66	)
Increase (decrease) in security deposits		39			(8	)		10
Net cash provided by operating activities		177			2,338			971

Cash flows from investing activities:
Improvements to real estate		(125	)		(102	)		(348	)
Payments received on notes receivable		—			334			2,375
Payments received on notes receivable - related party		—			—			537
Investments in non-consolidated entities		(435	)		(1,211	)		(2,775	)
Distributions from non-consolidated entities		897			173			1,105
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		337			(806	)		894

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on notes payable		(165	)		(156	)		(145	)
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		400			2,500			—
Payments on notes payable - related party		(1,400	)		—			—
Optional redemptions		—			(28	)		(207	)
Issuance costs		—			—			(1	)
Distributions		—			(1,252	)		(5,382	)
Distributions to non-controlling interest		—			(217	)		(457	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,165	)		847			(6,192	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(651	)		2,379			(4,327	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		3,297			918			5,245
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	2,646		$	3,297		$	918

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for interest	$	2,951		$	3,095		$	3,041
Cash paid during the period for taxes	$	39		$	23		$	65

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

During the year ended December 31, 2010, $162,000 in accrued interest on notes payable - related party was added to the note balances.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, $487,000 in accounts payable - related party was reclassified to notes payable - related party.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as the “Partnership,” “MIG III,” “we,” “us” or “our”), was formed on April 19, 2005 to acquire, develop and operate, directly or indirectly through joint venture arrangements, a portfolio of commercial real estate consisting primarily of multi-tenant shopping centers and mixed-use developments. The general partner of the Partnership is AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “General Partner”), which is a subsidiary of AmREIT, Inc., a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reporting, non-traded Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“AmREIT”). The General Partner maintains its principal place of business in Houston, Texas.

We commenced our principal operations on June 30, 2005, when we accepted subscriptions for the minimum offering of $2.0 million pursuant to the terms of our Offering Memorandum dated April 19, 2005 (the “Offering Memorandum”) and issued the initial 80 limited partnership units (the “Units”). As of October 31, 2006, we had received $71.1 million for the sale of 2,844 Units and closed the offering. As of December 31, 2010, our investments include three wholly-owned properties comprising 225,000 square feet of gross leasable area, one property in which we own a controlling interest comprising 102,000 square feet of gross leasable area and seven properties in which we own a non-controlling interest through joint ventures comprising 1,142,000 square feet of gross leasable area.

The United States has undergone and may continue to experience a prolonged recession that has been marked by pervasive and fundamental disruptions in the financial markets. Continued concerns regarding the uncertainty of whether the U.S. economy will be adversely affected by inflation, deflation or stagflation and the systemic impact of increased unemployment, volatile energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market and a severely distressed real estate market have contributed to increased market volatility and weakened business and consumer confidence. The United States may not experience a sustained recovery and could suffer pronounced instability and decreased economic activity for an extended period of time. Our operations are sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact our tenants, including, among other things, increased bad debts due to such recessionary pressures. A general reduction in the level of tenant leasing or shifts in tenant leasing practices could adversely affect our revenues, profitability and results of operations. It is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the financial market problems and the many ways in which they may affect our tenants and our business in general. A significant additional deterioration in the U.S. economy or the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more of our significant tenants could cause our cash resources to be insufficient to meet our obligations over the next 12 months. Effective July 15, 2009, we suspended all distributions in an effort to conserve cash and to protect partners’ invested capital. As we have several projects that are mid-stream in redevelopment, we are conserving cash from operations to improve our ability to fund capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, and to meet our obligations, including debt service. We believe that the economy and real estate market will recover prior to our anticipated liquidation commencement date of October 31, 2012. However, if the economy remains in a protracted recession, we may seek to postpone liquidation if we believe such liquidation is not in the best interests of the Partners at that time.

We have $24.6 million in debt that matures during 2011. This consists of a $13.4 million mortgage on our Lantern Lane property which matures in September 2011 and a $11.2 million mortgage on our Olmos Creek property which matures in December 2011. In each case, we believe that we will be able to extend the mortgage with the current lender, refinance with a new lender, or dispose of the property in an orderly sale prior to the maturity date. No assurance can be given that we will be able to generate such liquidity. In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient liquidity, we may be forced to sell one or more properties at a time when it is disadvantageous to do so, potentially resulting in losses on disposition of those properties.

F-7

Table of Contents

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts of any wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. Investments in joint ventures and partnerships where we have the ability to exercise significant influence but do not exercise financial and operating control are accounted for using the equity method (see Note 3). The significant accounting policies of our non-consolidated entities are consistent with those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. As applicable, we consolidate certain joint ventures and partnerships in which we own less than a 100% equity interest if the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary (as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation). As of December 31, 2010, we do not have any interests in variable interest entities. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. All of the leases are accounted for as operating leases, and, although certain leases of the properties provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or increases or decreases in the minimum lease payments over the terms of the leases, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, possession or control occurs on the lease commencement date. We have determined that we are the owner of any tenant improvements that we fund pursuant to the lease terms. In cases where significant tenant improvements are made prior to lease commencement, the leased asset is considered to be the finished space, and revenue recognition therefore begins when the improvements are substantially complete.

Accrued rents are included in tenant receivables. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of the lease agreements contain provisions that grant additional rents based on tenants’ sales volumes (contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, there were no percentage rents recognized. We recognize lease termination fees in the period that the lease is terminated and collection of the fees is reasonably assured. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we recognized no lease termination fees. Upon early lease termination, as applicable, we also provide for losses related to unrecovered intangibles and other assets and write off any assets or liabilities and the associated accumulated amortization.

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Development Properties - Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures related to the development of real estate are carried at cost which includes capitalized carrying charges, acquisition costs and development costs. Carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes, loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under construction, are capitalized as part of construction in progress. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for occupancy. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we did not capitalize any interest or taxes on properties under development.

F-8

Table of Contents

Acquired Properties and Acquired Lease Intangibles - We account for acquisitions of operating properties pursuant to ASC 805, Business Combinations, as we believe our operating real estate meets the definition of a “business” pursuant to this guidance. Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of the acquired operating properties to land, building and improvements, identifiable intangible assets and to the acquired liabilities based on their respective fair values. Identifiable intangibles include amounts allocated to acquired above- and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases and customer relationship value, if any. We determine fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic conditions that may affect the property. Factors considered by management in our analysis of determining the as-if-vacant property value include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, tenant demand and other economic conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related expenses. Intangibles related to above- and below-market leases and in-place lease value are recorded as acquired lease intangibles and are amortized as an adjustment to rental income or amortization expense, as appropriate, over the remaining terms of the underlying leases. Below-market leases include fixed-rate renewal periods. Premiums or discounts on acquired above- and below-market debt are amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of such debt.

We expense acquisition costs associated with operating properties as incurred in accordance with ASC 805. Prior to adoption of ASC 805, such costs were capitalized and then expensed if and when the acquisition became no longer probable. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we expensed acquisition costs of $0, $6,000 and $134,000, respectively.

Depreciation - Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of up to 39 years for buildings and site improvements and over the term of lease for tenant-specific improvements. We re-evaluate the useful lives of our buildings and improvements as warranted by changing conditions at our properties. As part of this re-evaluation, we may also consider whether such changes indicate a potential impairment, and we perform an impairment analysis as necessary, at the property level. In the case of a property redevelopment, we reassess the useful lives of specific buildings and other improvements to be demolished as part of that redevelopment once the redevelopment is probable to occur. During 2010, we reassessed the useful lives of certain buildings at our Woodlake Square property (non-consolidated investment) as a result of our redevelopment of the center, which included the demolition of several buildings. As a result of this change in estimate, our equity in losses from non-consolidated entities was $1.8 million higher ($645.11 per unit) for the year ended December 31, 2010 than it otherwise would have been.

Properties Held for Sale - Properties will be classified as held for sale if we have decided to market the property for immediate sale in its present condition with the belief that the sale will be completed within one year. Properties held for sale will be carried at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the held for sale period. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no properties held for sale.

Impairment - We review our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including acquired lease intangibles and accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an impairment in value occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Both the estimated undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination are based upon various factors which require complex and subjective judgments to be made by management. Such assumptions include projecting lease-up periods, holding periods, cap rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant creditworthiness, tenant improvement allowances, terminal sales value and certain macroeconomic factors among other assumptions to be made for each property. For our multi-building retail centers, we consider the entire retail center as the asset group for purposes of our impairment analysis. We review our investments in non-consolidated entities for impairment based of a similar review of the properties held by the investee entity. As discussed in Note 4, our Woodlake Square property recorded an impairment during the year ended December 31, 2010. Our portion of such impairment was recorded in equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries. No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008.

F-9

Table of Contents

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations as they apply to real estate pertaining to chemicals used by the dry cleaning industry, the existence of asbestos in older shopping centers, and underground petroleum storage tanks. We believe that the tenants who currently operate dry cleaning plants or gas stations do so in accordance with current laws and regulations. We believe that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not have a material affect on our financial position, liquidity, or operations (See Note 11). However, we can give no assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to the shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to it; that the current environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by unrelated third parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to the Partnership.

RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS

Tenant Receivables - Included in tenant receivables are base rents, tenant reimbursements and adjustments related to recording rents on a straight-line basis. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable is determined based upon customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery of our claim with respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt levels, and current economic trends. Bad debt expenses and any related recoveries are included in general and administrative expense. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, our allowance for uncollectible accounts related to our tenant receivables was $448,000 and $255,000, respectively.

Accounts Receivable – Related Party - included in accounts receivable related party are short-term cash advances provided to certain of our affiliated investment entities primarily for their development needs. These cash advances are due upon demand.

DEFERRED COSTS

Deferred costs include deferred leasing costs and loan acquisition costs, net of amortization. Loan acquisition costs are incurred in obtaining financing and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt agreements using a method that approximates the effective interest method. Deferred leasing costs consist of external commissions associated with leasing our properties and are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. If a lease is terminated early, or a loan is paid in full prior to maturity, the remaining deferred costs will be written off. Accumulated amortization related to loan acquisition costs as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $348,000 and $272,000, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to leasing costs as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, totaled $156,000 and $101,000, respectively.

INCOME TAXES

Federal - No provision for U.S. federal income taxes is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As a partnership, we are not subject to federal income tax, and the federal tax effect of our activities is passed through to our partners.

State - In May 2006, the State of Texas adopted House Bill 3, which modified the state’s franchise tax structure, replacing the previous tax based on capital or earned surplus with one based on margin (often referred to as the “Texas Margin Tax” effective with franchise tax reports filed on or after January 1, 2008. The Texas Margin Tax is computed by applying the applicable tax rate (1% for the Partnership) to the profit margin, which, generally, will be determined for us as total revenue less a 30% standard deduction. Although House Bill 3 states that the Texas Margin Tax is not an income tax, the Partnership believes that ASC 740 Income Taxes, applies to the Texas Margin Tax. The Texas Margin Tax accrued as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $43,000 and $48,000, respectively.

F-10

Table of Contents

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We account for assets and liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:


	•	Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

	•	Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

	•	Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on the Company’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

ASC 820 requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. Observable inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of our own. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Notes Payable – In determining the fair value of our debt instruments, we determine the appropriate Treasury Bill Rate based on the remaining time to maturity for each of the debt instruments. We then add the appropriate yield spread to the Treasury Bill Rate. The yield spread is a risk premium estimated by investors to account for credit risk involved in debt financing. The spread is typically estimated based on the property type and loan-to-value ratio of the debt instrument. The result is an estimate of the market interest rate a typical investor would expect to receive given the underlying subject asset (property type) and remaining time to maturity. We believe the fair value of our notes payable is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Based on these estimates, the fair value of notes payable was $52.0 million and $48.8 million at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

F-11

Table of Contents

The following table presents our notes payable and related valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Notes Payable	$	—	$	52,021	$	—

NEWACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2009, the FASB amended the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities in ASC 810, Consolidation. The amendments significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—an interpretation of ARB No. 51, and changes the way entities account for securitizations and variable interest entities as a result of the elimination of the Qualified Special Purpose Entity concept. We adopted the provisions of ASC 810 on January 1, 2010. Such adoption did not have an effect on our results of operations or financial position.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.

INTEREST

Interest is charged to interest expense as it accrues. No interest has been capitalized on any consolidated properties since inception of the Partnership.

SEGMENT REPORTING

ASC 280, Segment Reporting establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. We determined that we have one reportable segment with activities related to investing in real estate. Our investments in real estate generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of multi-tenant retail properties, which comprised 100% of our total consolidated revenues for all periods presented. We evaluate operating performance on an individual property level. However, as all of our properties have similar economic characteristics, tenants, products and services, our properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the current period consolidated financial statements.

F-12

Table of Contents

3. OPERATING LEASES

Our operating leases generally range from two to twenty-five years and generally include one or more five year renewal options. A summary of minimum future base rentals to be received, exclusive of any renewals, under non-cancelable operating leases in existence at December 31, 2010 is as follows:


Year	Minimum Base Rents
2011	$	4,355,000
2012		4,129,000
2013		3,443,000
2014		2,901,000
2015		2,601,000
Thereafter		5,018,000
Total	$	22,447,000

Future minimum rental revenue excludes amounts that may be received from tenants for reimbursements of operating costs, real estate taxes and insurance. Expense reimbursements recognized as revenue totaled $1.3 million, $1.7 million and $1.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

4. INVESTMENTS IN NON-CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

Since inception, we have made the following investments in five entities through which we own an interest in seven properties:


	•	In March 2006, we acquired a 50% interest in 5433 Westheimer, LP which owns an office building with a gross leasable area of 134,000 square feet and a 152-room hotel in Houston, Texas. In November 2008, we acquired an additional 7.5% interest in 5433 Westheimer, LP from our third party, joint-venture partner for $800,000. The remaining 42.5% is owned by that same party. The property is not consolidated into our financial statements as we and our joint venture partner share equally in decision making rights through our equal ownership in the general partner. Construction of the hotel was completed in August 2009, and we are currently evaluating opportunities to further develop the property.

	•	In December 2006, we acquired a 20% interest in PTC/BSQ Holding Company LLC which owns three multi-tenant retail properties located in Plano, Texas with a combined gross leasable area of 395,000 square feet. The remaining 80% is owned by an unaffiliated third party.

	•	In December 2006, we acquired a 50% interest in AmREIT Casa Linda, LP which owns a multi-tenant retail property located in Dallas, Texas with a combined gross leasable area of 325,000 square feet. The remaining 50% is owned by AmREIT Monthly Income and Growth Fund IV, LP (“MIG IV”), an affiliate of our General Partner.

	•	In August 2007, we acquired a 30% interest in AmREIT Woodlake Square, LP which owns a multi-tenant retail property located in Houston, Texas with a combined gross leasable area of 206,000 square feet. The remaining 70% interest was held by affiliated AmREIT entities, MIG IV and AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation (“ARIC”). In July 2010, we and our affiliated partners of AmREIT Woodlake, LP entered into a joint venture with a third-party institutional partner wherein the partner acquired a 90% interest in the joint venture. As a result of this transaction, we now hold a 3% interest in Woodlake Square, which carries a promoted interest in profits and cash flows once an 11.65% return is met on the project. AmREIT Woodlake, LP recorded an impairment for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our portion of such impairment was $185,000 and has been recorded in equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries in our consolidated statements of operations. We will continue to account for this investment using the equity method given our ability to significantly influence the property’s operations. The joint venture commenced redevelopment of this property in the third quarter of 2010. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $8.0 million, and it is scheduled to be completed in the second quarter of 2011.

F-13

Table of Contents


	•	In November 2007, we acquired a 30% interest in AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, LP which owns Woodlake Pointe, a multi-tenant retail property located in Houston, Texas with a combined gross leasable area of 82,120 square feet. The remaining 70% is owned by affiliated AmREIT entities, MIG IV and ARIC. In May 2008, AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, LP acquired an additional tract of land adjacent to Woodlake Pointe for $1.3 million.

We report our investments in these entities using the equity method of accounting due to our ability to exercise significant influence over them. Combined condensed financial information for our non-consolidated entities (at 100%) is summarized as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as follows:


Assets
Property, net	$	203,408	$	212,882
Cash		3,295		2,869
Other assets		17,657		19,311
Total assets	$	224,360	$	235,062
Liabilities and partners’ capital
Notes payable	$	128,435	$	131,697
Other liabilities		14,527		18,387
Partners’ capital		81,398		84,978
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	224,360	$	235,062

MIG III share of net assets	$	22,190	$	26,212


Combined statements of operations (in thousands)	Year ended December 31, 2010			Year ended December 31, 2009			Year ended December 31, 2008
Revenues
Total revenues	$	20,850		$	19,563		$	19,164
Expenses
Depreciation and amortization		14,145			8,925			9,817
Interest		6,024			6,023			5,910
Other		10,830			8,289			7,897
Total expenses		30,999			23,237			23,624
Net Loss	$	(10,149	)	$	(3,674	)	$	(4,460	)

MIG III share of net loss	$	(3,639	)	$	(1,570	)	$	(1,836	)

F-14

Table of Contents

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In December 2007, AmREIT Woodlake Square, LP, one of our non-consolidated investment entities, entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $23.8 million and a fixed rate of 5.465% in order to manage the volatility inherent in its variable-rate mortgage. On October 1, 2008, that interest rate swap was designated as a hedge for financial reporting purposes. In accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income. Prior to October 1, 2008, such changes in fair value were recorded as a loss from derivative on the property’s statement of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, our portion of the increase in fair value totaled $79,000 and $174,000, respectively and is included in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) on our consolidated statements of capital. This swap transaction was terminated, and the underlying mortgage was refinanced in conjunction with the new joint venture agreement on the Woodlake Square property. In accordance with ASC 815, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive gain was recorded to interest expense at the AmREIT Woodlake Square, LP level upon termination of the swap. We recorded our portion of this expense as a component of equity in losses from non-consolidated subsidiaries. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

5. ACQUIRED LEASE INTANGIBLES

In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, we have identified and recorded the value of acquired lease intangibles at the property acquisition date. Such intangibles include the value of acquired in-place leases and above- and below-market leases. Acquired lease intangible assets (in-place leases and above-market leases) are amortized over the leases’ remaining terms, which range from 1 year to 14 years. Acquired lease intangible liabilities (below-market leases) are accreted over the leases’ remaining non-cancelable lease term, plus any fixed-rate renewal options, if any, which range from 1 year to 14 years. The amortization (accretion) of above (and below) market leases is recorded as a reduction of (increase in) rental income, and the amortization of in-place leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense. The amortization expense related to in-place leases was approximately $471,000, $630,000 and $686,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amortization of above-market leases, which was recorded as a reduction of rental income, was approximately $48,000, $55,000 and $71,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Accretion of below market leases was approximately $143,000, $193,000 and $189,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Acquired in-place lease and above and below-market lease amounts and their respective accumulated amortization are as follows (in thousands):


	As of December 31, 2010			As of December 31, 2009
Acquired lease intangible assets:
In-place leases	$	3,871		$	4,462
In-place leases - accumulated amortization		(2,618	)		(2,738	)
Above-market leases		269			269
Above-market leases - accumulated amortization		(237	)		(189	)
Acquired lease intangibles, net	$	1,285		$	1,804

Acquired lease intangible liabilities:
Below-market leases	$	686		$	1,127
Below-market leases - accumulated accretion		(505	)		(803	)
Acquired below-market lease intangibles, net	$	181		$	324

F-15

Table of Contents

The estimated aggregate amortization amounts from acquired lease intangibles for each of the next five years are as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31,	Amortization expense (in-place leases)		Rental income (above and below- market leases)
2011	$	286	$	55
2012		264		51
2013		174		10
2014		149		10
2015		149		10
Totals	$	1,022	$	136

6. NOTES PAYABLE

Our outstanding debt at December 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted entirely of fixed-rate mortgage loans of approximately $50.4 million and $50.5 million, respectively. Our mortgage loans are secured by our real estate properties and may be prepaid, but could be subject to a yield-maintenance premium or prepayment penalty. Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly installments of interest and principal and our mortgages mature over various terms ranging from September 2011 through January 2036. As of December 31, 2010, the weighted-average interest rate on our fixed-rate debt is 5.9%, and the weighted average remaining life of such debt is 9.1 years.

As of December 31, 2010, scheduled principal repayments on notes payable were as follows (in thousands):


Scheduled payments by year	Principal		Loan maturities		Total payments
2011	$	175	$	24,615	$	24,790
2012		183		—		183
2013		196		—		196
2014		207		—		207
Thereafter		92		24,904		24,996
Total	$	853	$	49,519	$	50,372

We serve as guarantor on debt in the amount of $36.9 million that is the primary obligation of our non-consolidated joint ventures. This debt matures in 2013 and 2014. We have not accrued any liability with respect to these guarantees as we believe it is unlikely we would be required to perform and, therefore, the fair value of any obligation would be insignificant.

Notes Payable – Related Party - In September 2009, we borrowed $2.5 million from affiliates of our General Partner. In January of 2010, we repaid $1 million to ARIC and borrowed $400,000 from AmREIT. In August 2010, we repaid the $400,000 owed to AmREIT. Of the balance as of December 31, 2010, $1.6 million accrues interest monthly at LIBOR plus a spread of 4.0% with a floor of 7.0%, and the remaining amount accrues interest monthly at LIBOR plus a spread of 3.875%, with a floor of 5.375%. The notes are secured by our investment interests in the Woodlake Pointe property.

7. CONCENTRATIONS

As of December 31, 2010, each of our four consolidated properties individually comprised greater than 10% of our consolidated total assets. Consistent with our strategy of investing in geographic areas that we know well, three of our four properties are located in the Houston metropolitan area. These Houston properties represent 82% of our rental income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Houston is Texas’ largest city and the fourth largest city in the United States.

F-16

Table of Contents

Following are the base rents generated by our top five tenants during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 ($ in thousands):


	Year ended December 31,
Tenant	2010		2009		2008
H-E-B Grocery (1)	$	1,425	$	1,425	$	1,425
Designer Shoe Warehouse (2)		390		550		550
Rice Food Markets, Inc.		292		292		292
Fidelity Investments		193		211		211
Fadis Mediterranean Delight		131		131		131
Totals	$	2,431	$	2,609	$	2,609


(1)	HEB Grocery is the anchor tenant on two of our properties, Market at Lake Houston and Olmos Creek. We sold our Market at Lake Houston property in February 2011 to AmREIT. The HEB Grocery on this property accounted for $1.1 million in base rents for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

(2)	On September 15, 2010, Designer Shoe Warehouse (“DSW”), our second largest tenant as determined by base rents paid, vacated its space at our Westside Plaza property upon expiration of its lease. In December 2010, we entered into a lease agreement with a women’s fashion retailer. The lease expires in June 2016.

8. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND MINORITY INTEREST

The General Partner invested $800,000 as a limited partner and $1,000 as a general partner. We began raising capital in June 2005 and had raised approximately $71.1 million at the time of the Offering’s closing in October 2006. The General Partner’s $800,000 investment represents a 1.1% limited partner interest in the Partnership.

Limited Optional Redemption – Our Units were sold pursuant to exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 and are not currently listed on a national exchange or otherwise traded in an organized securities market. These Units may be transferred only with consent of the General Partner after delivery of required documents, and in any event, only if we register the offer and sale of the Units under applicable securities laws or if an exemption from such registration is available. We do not expect to register the offer and sale of the Units. Moreover, we do not anticipate that any public market for the Units will develop. In order to provide limited partners with the possibility of liquidity, limited partners who have held their units for at least three years may receive the benefit of interim liquidity by presenting all of those units to the Partnership for redemption. At that time, we may, at our sole election and subject to the conditions and limitations described below, redeem the Units presented for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemption. The redemption price to be paid will be 92% of the limited partner’s unreturned invested capital. At no time during a 12-month period, however, may the number of Units redeemed by us exceed 2% of the number of Units outstanding at the beginning of that 12-month period. We received no redemption requests during the year ended December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received five redemption requests from the holders of 11.4 Units. We granted one request to the holder of 1.2 units for $28,000. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we received and granted three redemption requests to the holders of nine Units for $207,000. All redemptions were paid using cash flows from operations. We suspended the optional redemption program during the second quarter of 2009 due to macroeconomic conditions and the need to preserve cash.

Distributions- During the operating stage of the Partnership, net cash flow, as defined, will be distributed 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner. Our distributions were paid at a rate of 3.0% per annum on invested capital through June 30, 2009. We suspended all distribution payments in July 2009 and do not anticipate reinstating distributions until improvements in the real estate and liquidity markets warrant such payment. All distributions to date have been a return of capital, and the source of such distributions has been cash flows from operations as well as our capital raising activities. During the liquidation stage of the Partnership (anticipated to commence in October 2012, unless extended), net cash flow, as defined, will be distributed among the limited partners and the General Partner in the following manner:

F-17

Table of Contents


	•	First - 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner until such time as the limited partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources (including monthly cash distributions during the operating stage of the Partnership) equal to 100% of their unreturned invested capital plus an amount equal to 10% per annum uncompounded on their invested capital.

	•	Second - 100% to the General Partner until it has received cumulative distributions from all sources (other than with respect to its limited partner units it purchased) in an amount equal to 40% of the net cash flow paid to date to the limited partners in excess of their adjusted capital.

	•	Thereafter - 60% to the limited partners and 40% to the General Partner.

Non-controlling Interest - Non-controlling interest represents a 40% ownership interest that one of our affiliate investment funds has in a real estate partnership that we consolidate as a result of our 60% controlling financial interest in such partnership.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Certain of our affiliates received fees and compensation during the organizational stage of the Partnership, including securities commissions and due diligence reimbursements, marketing reimbursements and reimbursement of organizational and offering expenses. These affiliates also receive fees for ongoing property management and administrative services. In the event that these companies are unable to provide us with the respective services, we would be required to find alternative providers of these services. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we did not make any payments to our affiliates for fees and compensation related to our organizational stage of the Partnership.

We have no employees or offices. Additionally, certain of our affiliates receive fees and compensation during the operating stage of the Partnership, including compensation for providing services to us in the areas of asset management, development and acquisitions, property management and leasing, financing, brokerage and administration. We reimburse our General Partner for an allocation of salary and other overhead costs. The following table summarizes the amount of such compensation paid to our affiliates during the 2010, 2009 and 2008 periods:


Type of Service	Service Description & Compensation	2010		2009		2008
Asset Management	1% of the net invested capital under management for accounting-related services, investor relations, facilitating the deployment of capital and other services provided by the General Partner in operating the Partnership	$	617,753	$	617,753	$	617,753
Development and Acquisitions	Between 3% and 6% of project costs for services provided by the affiliate in identifying, evaluating, procuring and, if applicable, developing properties (capitalized as part of real estate assets)		—		—		—
Property Management and Leasing	Property management fees are not to exceed 4% of gross rentals for providing property management, operating, maintenance and other services required to maintain a quality property. Leasing fees are not to exceed 2% of base rent on a lease renewal and 6% of based rent on an initial lease or procuring tenants and negotiating the terms of the tenant leases.		338,487		368,995		359,436
Additional Services	Financing coordination fee equal to 1% of the loan proceeds for procuring debt financing for Partnership		—		—		—
Brokerage	Brokerage fees are not to exceed 6% of the sales price for the sale of the property to an unaffiliated thirty party		—		—		—

F-18

Table of Contents


Type of Service	Service Description & Compensation	2010		2009		2008
Administration Costs Reimbursements	These costs represent actual expenses incurred by the General Partner in connection with its provision of administrative services, including personnel costs		437,473		459,408		301,822
	Total	$	1,393,713	$	1,446,156	$	1,279,011

In addition to the above fees paid by us, the non-consolidated entities in which we own an investment paid property management, leasing, development, and construction management fees of $1.2 million, $1.2 million, and $981,000 to one of our affiliated entities during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our Casa Linda property paid a total of $6.2 million in construction fees to an affiliated entity during 2008 and 2009.

10. REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

As discussed in Note 4 above, in July 2010, we and our affiliated partners of AmREIT Woodlake L.P. entered into a joint venture agreement with a third party whereby the new partner acquired a 90% interest in the sole property owned by AmREIT Woodlake L.P. As a result of this transaction, we now hold a 3% interest in the property.

We had no acquisitions or dispositions of properties in which we have a controlling financial interest during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. See Note 4 for a discussion of our investment activity with respect to our non-consolidated subsidiaries during the same periods. See also Note 12 for a subsequent event involving the sale of one of our consolidated properties subsequent to December 31, 2010.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation - In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. There
are no material pending legal proceedings known to be contemplated against us.

Environmental matters - In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, we may be potentially liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. We have not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim.

In conjunction with our acquisition of the Lantern Lane shopping center in September 2006, we identified an environmental exposure caused by a dry cleaning business that operated on the property prior to our ownership. Our agreement with the seller provides that, if the seller cannot provide satisfactory evidence that they have performed appropriate remediation, we can reduce our note payable to them by the lesser of the actual costs to remediate or $1.0 million. We believe that the remediation costs will not exceed $1.0 million based on our environmental investigation. We have not recorded a separate liability for this exposure as we believe that we are fully indemnified by the seller pursuant to this arrangement. To the extent that we are required to fund a portion of the remediation, such amount will be financed through the reduction of the note payable to the seller. We believe that this matter will not have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, and we are aware of no other environmental exposures.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

We have evaluated all events or transactions as of the date through which the financial statements were made available for issuance. Except as noted below, we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements during this period.

F-19

Table of Contents

AmREIT MONTHLY INCOME & GROWTH FUND III, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - Consolidated Real Estate Owned and Accumulated Depreciation
For the year ended December 31, 2010

Initial Cost

Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note A)

Total Cost

Property Description

Building and
Improvements

Land

Building and
Improvements

Land

Total

Accumulated
Depreciation

Date
Acquired

Encumbrances

Westside Plaza

8,631,610

4,750,000

1,233,525

9,855,532

4,759,603

14,615,135

(1,509,645

)

9/30/2005

10,081,959

Olmos Creek

9,829,663

4,261,553

(563,100

)

9,979,522

3,548,594

13,528,116

(1,747,830

)

6/30/2006

11,175,000

Lantern Lane

11,386,338

6,308,354

752,666

12,118,012

6,329,346

18,447,358

(2,482,790

)

9/29/2006

13,440,000

Lake Houston

15,968,495

3,800,000

351,800

16,311,782

3,808,513

20,120,295

(2,631,501

)

12/12/2005

15,675,000

Total

45,816,106

19,119,907

1,774,891

48,264,848

18,446,056

66,710,904

(8,371,766

)

50,371,959

Note A - The negative balance for costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition could be the result of out-parcels sold or disposals due to tenant vacancies.

Activity within real estate and accumulated depreciation during the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 is as follows:


	Cost			Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	66,435,339		$	3,115,040
Acquisitions / additions		347,962			—
Disposals		(52,079	)		(14,576	)
Depreciation expense		—			1,817,217
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	66,731,222		$	4,917,681
Acquisitions / additions		101,624			—
Disposals		(108,609	)		(42,812	)
Depreciation expense		—			1,816,496
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	66,724,237		$	6,691,365
Acquisitions / additions		124,467
Disposals		(137,800	)		(118,923	)
Depreciation expense					1,799,324
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	66,710,904		$	8,371,766

S-1

Attached files

AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Fund III Ltd Reports

Also read