Attached files

file filename
EX-31 - ATLAS FUTURES FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPatlas10k2010ex31.txt
EX-32 - ATLAS FUTURES FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPatlas10k2010ex32.txt

                                   FORM 10-K

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the year ended  12-31-2010

OR

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from	to

Commission file number  333-53111

                    ATLAS FUTURES FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	Delaware			51-0380494
	State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization	Identification No.)

                     505 Brookfield Drive, Dover, DE	19901
              (Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (800) 331-1532

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None			None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                           Limited Partnership Units
                               (Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No	[X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec 232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [ ] No [
] N/A

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (Sec 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer 	[ ]
Accelerated filer 		[ ]
Non-accelerated filer 		[X] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company 	[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common
equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common
equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently
completed second fiscal quarter.:  Not Applicable.  There is no market for the
Units of partnership interests and none is expected to develop.  The
Registrant is a commodity pool.  The Units are registered to permit the
initial sale of Units at month end net asset value.


Documents Incorporated by Reference Audited Financial Statements for Registrant filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for the years ended December 31, 1998 through 2009 at Registration Nos. 333-61217, 333-53111 and 333-59976. Registration Statement on Form S-1 and all amendments thereto filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission at Registration Nos. 333- 61217, 333-59976 and 333-170235 are incorporated by reference to Parts I, II, III, and IV. PART I Item 1. Business On September 3, 1999, the registration statement filed by Atlas Futures Fund, L. P., (the 'Fund') with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC'), which incorporated the disclosure document filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 'CFTC') was declared effective. Offers and sales of the Fund's limited partnership interests (the 'Units') at the initial price of $1,000 per Unit commenced on that date to residents of the states selected by the General Partner. On October 15, 1999, the Fund had sold in excess of the $700,000 in face amount of Units, the amount required to break escrow and deliver the sales proceeds to the Fund accounts to permit it to commence the speculative trading of commodity futures. Trading commenced on November 18, 1999. On May 1, 2001, the Registrant registered $8,000,000 in additional Units. Units are offered and sold at the net asset value per Unit ('NAV') determined after addition of profits and deduction of losses, expenses, and reserves, at the close on the last business day of each month. See the financial statements for the total value of the Fund and the NAV as of the date of the statements. The trades for the Fund are selected and placed with the futures commission merchant ('FCM'), i.e., clearing broker, for the account of the Fund by one or more CTAs selected by the General Partner of the Fund. Since the inception of trading through February 1, 2005, the Fund account was traded by a single CTA, Clarke Capital Management, Inc. 116 W. 2nd Street, Hinsdale, Illinois 60521 (630) 323-5913. As of February 1, 2005, NuWave Investment Company, 1099 Mount Kemble Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey 07960, Telephone: (973) 425-9192, Fax: (973) 425-9190, E-mail: info@NuWavecorp.com was added as a CTA. As of October 1, 2007, NuWave was removed as CTA. The books and records of the trades placed by the CTA in the Fund's trading account are kept and are available for inspection by the Limited Partners at the office of the corporate General Partner, 5914 N. 300 West, Fremont, IN 46737. Clarke is not paid a management fee of the equity assigned to it to manage, but is paid an incentive fee of twenty-five percent (25%) of New Net Profit that it generates, as that term is defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement which governs the operation of the Fund, payable quarterly. The Fund Limited Partnership Agreement is included as Exhibit A to the prospectus delivered to the prospective investors and filed as part of the Registration Statement. The Limited Partnership Agreement defines the terms of operation of the Fund and is incorporated herein by reference. None of the purchasers of Limited Partnership Units ('Limited Partners') has a voice in the management of the Fund or ownership in the General Partner or the trading advisor. Reports of the NAV are sent to the Partners within twenty days following the end of each month. Ashley Capital Management, Inc., the corporate General Partner and Commodity Pool Operator, is paid monthly fixed brokerage commissions of eleven twelfths of one percent (11/12%) of the total value of the funds available for trading in the Fund's accounts at the FCM [eleven percent (11%) per year], from which it pays seven percent (7%) of the eleven percent (11%) to Futures Investment Company as introducing broker, which in turn pays all clearing costs, including pit brokerage fees, which includes floor brokerage, NFA and exchange fees for trades. The FCM is selected by the General Partner and holds a portion of the Fund's trading equity and places the trades as directed by the CTA pursuant to a power of attorney and advisory agreement granted by the Fund. The CTA agreements are terminable at the will of the parties. The sale of Units is regulated by Securities Act of 1933 and the Commodity Exchange Act. Once the Units are issued, the operation of the Fund is subject to regulation pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Commodity Exchange Act. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Securities Commissions and securities acts of the several States where its Units are offered and sold have jurisdiction over the operation of the Fund. The National Futures Association has jurisdiction over the operation of the General Partner and the Commodity Trading Advisors. This regulatory structure is not intended, nor does it, protect investors from the risks inherent in the trading of futures and options. 2
On October 29, 2010, the Registrant filed a registration statement to register $10,000,000 in Units which, upon effectiveness, will be used to offer such Units for sale to the public under similar terms to the previous offering; however, there will be compensation to the affiliated selling agent, Futures Investment Company, of an up front selling commission of 1% calculated on the gross subscription amount in addition to $2,000 paid by the Fund for legal fees associated with the review of the offering by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). until Such offering will continue until the total dollar amount of Units is sold, or the offering terminates as permitted or required by the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Item 1A. Risk Factors The trading of futures, options on futures and other commodities related investments is highly speculative and risky. You should make an investment in the Fund only after consulting with independent, qualified sources of investment and tax advice and only if your financial condition will permit you to bear the risk of a total loss of your investment. You should consider an investment in the Units only as a long-term investment. Moreover, to evaluate the risks of this investment properly, you must familiarize yourself with the relevant terms and concepts relating to commodities trading and the regulation of commodities trading, which are discussed in the Risk Factors section of the Prospectus, which is incorporated herein by reference. You should carefully consider all the information we have included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K and our subsequent periodic filings with the SEC. In particular, you should carefully consider the risk factors described above and read the risks and uncertainties as set forth in the 'Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations' Section of this Form 10-K. Any of the heretofore mentioned risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect the Fund, its trading activities, operating results, financial condition and Net Asset Value and therefore could negatively impact the value of your investment. You should not invest in the Units unless you can afford to lose all of your investment. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties The general partner has sole authority to determine the percentage of Fund assets that will be held on deposit with the futures commission merchant (FCM), used for other investments, and held in bank accounts to pay current obligations. As of December 31, 2010, the Fund maintained approximately: 44% of its assets in a Treasury Direct Account maintained with the United States Department of the Treasury, 45% at the futures commission merchant (FCM) to be available for trading by the trading advisor, and 9% in a cash management fund that invests only in U.S. Treasurys and has high liquidity. All such accounts are held in the name of the partnership and not commingled with those of any other entity. Approximately 2% of the previous month's net assets are retained in the Fund's bank accounts to pay expenses and redemptions. Throughout the periods covered by this report, the FCM was MF Global Inc. (see Subsequent Events, below), which is a member of the National Futures Association and registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act as a FCM. The trading of futures, options on futures and other commodities is highly speculative and the Fund has an unlimited risk of loss, including the pledge of all of its assets to the FCM to secure the losses on the trades made on its behalf by the commodity trading advisor or advisors selected, from time to time, by the General Partner. Subsequent Events: Effective February 10, 2011, the trades selected by the Fund's trading advisor, Clarke Capital Management, Inc., began to be cleared by Vision Financial Markets LLC. Trades continue to be introduced by Futures Investment Company. No further trades will be placed through MF Global Inc. All trading decisions continue to be made by Clarke and this change will not have any impact on its trading decisions. 3
Item 3. Legal Proceedings There have been no legal proceedings against the Fund, its General Partner, the CTA, the IB or any of their Affiliates, directors or officers. The FCM, MF Global Inc. ('MFG'), (MFG was formerly known as Man Financial Inc. ('MFI') until the change of name to MFG was effected on July 19, 2007), has had the following described reportable events, none of which, in the opinion of the FCM, is material to the performance of the FCM on behalf of the Fund's account (see Subsequent Events at the end of this section): In May 2006, MFI was sued by the Receiver for Philadelphia Alternate Asset Fund ('PAAF') and associated entities for common law negligence, common law fraud, violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and RICO violations (the 'Litigation'). In December 2007, without admitting any liability of any party to the Litigation to any other party to the Litigation, the Litigation was settled with MFI agreeing to pay $69 million, plus $6 million of legal expenses, to the Receiver, in exchange for releases from all applicable parties and the dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice. In a related action, MFI settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In the Matter of MF Global, f/k/a Man Financial Inc., and Thomas Gilmartin) brought by the CFTC against MFI and one of its employees for failure to supervise and recordkeeping violations. Without admitting or denying the allegations, MFI agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $2 million and accept a cease and desist order. On February 20, 2007, MFI settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In the Matter of Steven M. Camp and Man Financial Inc., CFTC Docket No. 07-04) in which MFI was alleged to have failed to supervise one of its former associated persons ('AP') who was charged with fraudulently soliciting customers to open accounts at MFI. The CFTC alleged that the former AP misrepresented the profitability of a web-based trading system and of a purported trading system to be traded by a commodity trading advisor. Without admitting or denying the allegation, MFI agreed to pay restitution to customers amounting to $196,900.44 and a civil monetary penalty of $120,000. MFI also agreed to a cease and desist order and to strengthen its supervisory system for overseeing sales solicitations by employees in connection with accounts to be traded under letters of direction in favor of third party system providers. On March 6, 2008, and thereafter, 5 virtually identical proposed class action securities suits were filed against MFG's parent, MF Global Ltd. (now, MF Global Holdings Ltd.) ('MF Global'), certain of its officers and directors, and Man Group plc. These suits have now been consolidated into a single action. The complaints seek to hold defendants liable under Secs. 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by alleging that the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with MF Global's initial public offering in July 2007 were materially false and misleading to the extent that representations were made regarding MF Global's risk management policies, procedures and systems. The allegations are based upon MF Global's disclosure of $141.5 million in trading losses incurred in a single day by an AP in his personal trading account ('Trading Incident'), which losses MFG was responsible to pay as an exchange clearing member. The consolidated cases have been dismissed on a motion to dismiss by defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed. In January 2011, the parties reached a preliminary agreement to settle whereby MF Global will contribute $2.5 million to an overall settlement amount of $90 million. The preliminary settlement will be subject to Court review and final approval. On December 17, 2009, MFG settled a CFTC administrative proceeding in connection with the Trading Incident and three other matters without admitting or denying any allegations and accepting a charge of failing to supervise (In the Matter of MF Global Inc. CFTC Docket No. 10-03). The three additional matters that were settled involved allegations that MF Global failed to implement procedures to ensure proper transmissions of price information for certain options that were sent to a customer, specifically that the price indications reflected a consensus taken on [a particular] time and date and were derived from different sources in the market place; failed to diligently supervise the proper and accurate preparation of trading cards and failed to maintain appropriate written authorization to conduct trades for a certain customer. Under the Commission's order, MFG agreed to pay an aggregate civil monetary penalty of $10 million (which it had previously accrued) and agreed to a cease and desist order. In addition, MFG agreed to specific undertakings related to its supervisory practices and procedures and MFG agreed that it would engage an independent outside firm to review and assess the implementation of the undertakings and certain recommendations that MFG previously accepted. At the same time, MFG, without admitting or denying the allegations made by the CME, settled a CME disciplinary action relating to the Trading Incident by paying a fine of $495,000. 4
On August 28, 2009, Bank of Montreal ('BMO') instituted suit against MFG and its former broker, Joseph Saab ('Saab') (as well as a firm named Optionable, Inc. and five of its principals or employees), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In its complaint, BMO asserts various claims against all defendants for their alleged misrepresentation of price quotes to BMO's Market Risk Department ('MRD') as independent quotes when defendants knew, or should have known, that David Lee ('Lee'), BMO's trader, created the quotes which, in circular fashion, were passed on to BMO through MFG's broker, thereby enabling Lee substantially to overvalue his book at BMO. BMO further alleges that MFG and Saab knew that Lee was fraudulently misrepresenting prices in his options natural gas book and aided and abetted his ability to do so by MFG's actions in sending price indications to the BMO MRD, and substantially assisted Lee's breach of his fiduciary duties to BMO as its employee. The Complaint seeks to hold all defendants jointly and severally liable and, although it does not specify an exact damage claim, it claims CAD 680.0 million (approximately $635.9 million) as a pre-tax loss for BMO in its natural gas trading, claims that it would not have paid brokerage commissions to MFG (and Optionable), would not have continued Lee and his supervisor as employees at substantial salaries and bonuses, and would not have incurred substantial legal costs and expenses to deal with the Lee mispricing. MFG has made a motion to dismiss, which was denied. In or about October 2003, MFI uncovered an apparent fraudulent scheme conducted by third parties unrelated to MFI that may have victimized a number of its clients. CCPM, a German Introducing Broker, introduced to MFI all the clients that may have been victimized. An agent of CCPM, Michael Woertche (and his asssociates), apparently engaged in a Ponzi scheme in which allegedly unauthorized transfers from and trading in accounts maintained at MFI were utilized to siphon money out of these accounts, on some occasions shortly after they were established. MFI was involved in two arbitration proceedings relating to these CCPM introduced accounts. The first arbitration involved claims made by two claimants before a NFA panel. The second arbitration involves claims made by four claimants before a FINRA panel. The claims in both arbitrations are based on allegations that MFI and an employee assisted CCPM in engaging in, or recklessly or negligently failed to prevent, unauthorized transfers from, and trading in, accounts maintained by MFI. Damages sought in the NFA arbitration proceeding were approximately $1,700,000 in compensatory damages, unspecified punitive damages and attorney's fees in addition to the rescission of certain deposit agreements. The NFA arbitration was settled for $200,000 as to one claimant and a net of $240,000 as to the second claimant during fiscal 2008. Damages sought in the FINRA proceeding were approximately $6,000,000 in compensatory damages and $12,000,000 in punitive damages. During the year ended March 31, 2009, the FINRA arbitration was settled for an aggregate of $800,000. The Liquidation Trustee ('Trustee') for Sentinel Management Group, Inc. ('Sentinel') sued MFG in June 2009 on the theory that MFG's withdrawal of $50.2 million within 90 days of the filing of Sentinel's bankruptcy petition on August 17, 2007 is a voidable preference under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, recoverable by the Trustee, along with interest and costs. In May 2009, investors in a venture set up by Nicholas Cosmo ('Cosmo') sued Bank of America and MFG, among others, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging that MFG, among others, aided and abetted Cosmo and related entities in a Ponzi scheme in which investors lost $400 million. MFG has made a motion to dismiss which was granted and cannot be appealed by plaintiffs until the conclusion of the case against the Bank of America. In December 2010, the Court-appointed receiver for Joseph Forte, L.P., ('Forte Partnership') filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that MFG was negligent in the handling of a futures account the Forte Partnership maintained at MFG. The Complaint alleges that as a result of MFG's negligence, Joseph Forte ('Forte') was able to operate a Ponzi scheme in which he misappropriated at least $25,000,000 from limited partners in the Forte Partnership. The Complaint seeks damages 'in excess of $150,000.' MFG has not been served with the complaint. 5
In the late spring of 2009, MFG was sued in Oklahoma State Court by customers who were substantial investors with Mark Trimble ('Trimble') and/or Phidippides Capital Management ('Phidippides'). Trimble and Phidippides may have been engaged in a Ponzi scheme. Plaintiffs allege that MFG 'materially aided and abetted' Trimble's and Phidippides' violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Oklahoma securities laws and they are seeking damages 'in excess of' $10,000 each. MFG made a motion to dismiss which was granted by the court. Plaintiffs have appealed. In the late spring of 2009, MFG was sued in Oklahoma State Court by customers who were substantial investors with Mark Trimble ('Trimble') and/or Phidippides Capital Management ('Phidippides'). Trimble and Phidippides may have been engaged in a Ponzi scheme. Plaintiffs allege that MFG 'materially aided and abetted' Trimble's and Phidippides' violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Oklahoma securities laws and they are seeking damages 'in excess of' $10,000 each. MFG made a motion to dismiss which was granted by the court. Plaintiffs have appealed. On August 4, 2010, MFG was added as a defendant to a consolidated class action complaint filed against Moore Capital Management and related entities in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims of manipulation and aiding and abetting manipulation, in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. Specifically, the complaint alleges that, between October 25, 2007 and June 6, 2008, Moore Capital directed MFG, as its executing broker, to enter 'large' market on close orders (at or near the time of the close) for platinum and palladium futures contracts, which allegedly caused artificially inflated prices. On August 10, 2010, MFG was added as a defendant to a related class action complaint filed against the Moore'related entities on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who traded the physical platinum and palladium in the relevant time frame, which alleges price fixing under the Sherman Act and violations of the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. On September 30, 2010 plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated class action complaint that includes all of the allegations and claims identified above on behalf of subclasses of traders of futures contracts of platinum and palladium and physical platinum and palladium. Plaintiffs' claimed damages have not been quantified. This matter is in its earliest stages. MFG and an affiliate, MF Global Market Services LLC ('Market Services'), are currently involved in litigation with a former customer of Market Services, Morgan Fuel & Heating Co., Inc. ('Morgan Fuel') and its principals, Anthony Bottini, Jr., Brian Bottini and Mark Bottini (the 'Bottinis'). The litigations arise out of trading losses incurred by Morgan Fuel in over-the-counter derivative swap transactions, which were unconditionally guaranteed by the Bottinis. On October 6, 2008, Market Services commenced an arbitration against the Bottinis to recover $8.3 million, which is the amount of the debt owed to Market Services by Morgan Fuel after the liquidation of the swap transactions. MF Global Market Services LLC v. Anthony Bottini, Jr., Brian Bottini and Mark Bottini, FINRA No. 08-03673. Each of the Bottinis executed a guaranty in favor of Market Services personally and unconditionally guaranteeing payment of the obligations of Morgan Fuel upon written demand by Market Services. Market Services asserted a claim of breach of contract based upon the Bottinis' failure to honor the guarantees. On October 21, 2008, Morgan Fuel commenced a separate arbitration proceeding before FINRA against MFG and Market Services. Morgan Fuel claims that MFG and Market Services caused Morgan Fuel to incur approximately $14.2 million in trading losses. Morgan Fuel v. MFG and Market Services, FINRA No. 08-03879. Morgan Fuel seeks recovery of $5.9 million in margin payments that it allegedly made to Market Services and a declaration that it has no responsibility to pay Market Services for the remaining $8.3 million in trading losses because Market Services should not have allowed Morgan Fuel to enter into, or maintain, the swap transactions. On MFG's motion, the Supreme Court of the State of New York determined that there was no agreement to arbitrate such claims. Morgan Fuel appealed and all appeals were denied. The Bottinis also asserted a third-party claim against Morgan Fuel, which in turn asserted a fourth-party claim against MFG, Market Services and Steven Bellino (an MFG employee) in the arbitration proceeding commenced by Market Services. The Supreme Court of the State of New York denied a motion to stay the fourth party claim but the denial to stay was reversed. Morgan Fuel filed a motion to appeal with the New York Court of Appeals which was denied. On December 12, 2008, MFG settled three CME Group disciplinary actions involving allegations that on a number of occasions in 2006 and 2007, MFG employees engaged in impermissible pre-execution communications in connection with trades executed on the e-cbot electronic trading platform, withheld customer orders that were executable in the market for the purpose of soliciting, and brokering contra-orders and crossed orders on the e-cbot 6
trading platform without allowing for the minimum required exposure period between the entry of the orders. MFG was also charged with failing to properly supervise its employees in connection with these trades. Without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, MFG consented to an order of a CME Business Conduct Committee Panel which found that MFG violated legacy CBOT Rule 504.00 and Regulations 480.10 and 9B.13 and 9B.13(c) and ordered MFG to pay a $400,000 fine, cease and desist from similar conduct and, in consultation with CME Market regulation Staff, enhance its training practices and supervisory procedures regarding electronic trading practices. MFG acts only as clearing broker for the Fund's futures accounts and as such is paid commissions for executing and clearing trades. MFG has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the Fund's prospectus or this report and will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to the CPO or the CTA, as the case may be, nor participate in the management of the CPO or of the Fund or of the CTA. Therefore, investors should not rely on MFG in deciding whether or not to participate in the Fund. The Fund is not aware of any threatened or potential claims or legal proceedings to which the Fund is a party or to which any of its assets are subject. MFG has represented to the General Partner that that none of the events it has reported will not now, or at any time in the future, interfere with its performance as the FCM for the Fund's account. Subsequent Events: Effective February 10, 2011, the trades selected by the Fund's trading advisor, Clarke Capital Management, Inc., began to be cleared by Vision Financial Markets LLC. No further trades will be placed through MF Global Inc. There have been no legal proceedings against Vision Financial Markets LLC or any of its affiliates, directors or officers. Item 4. (Removed and Reserved) N/A PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Limited Partnership Units, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The Fund desires to be taxed as a partnership and not as a corporation. In furtherance of this objective, the Limited Partnership Agreement, subject to certain exceptions upon the death of a Limited Partner, requires all Limited Partners to obtain the approval of the General Partner prior to the transfer of any Units of partnership interest. Accordingly, there is no trading market for the Fund Units and none is likely to develop. The Limited Partners must rely upon the right of Redemption provided in the Limited Partnership Agreement to liquidate their interest. The Fund has fewer than 300 holders of its securities. Limited Partners are required to represent to the issuer that they are able to understand and accept the risks of investment in a commodity pool for which no market of interests will develop and that the right of redemption will be the sole expected method of withdrawal of equity from the Fund. The General Partner has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Fund will make to the Partners. The Fund has not made any distributions as of the date hereof. The Fund has no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. See the Limited Partnership Agreement attached as Exhibit A to the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference, for a complete explanation of the limitations upon transfer and right of redemption provided to Partners. Item 6. Selected Financial Data The Fund is not required to pay dividends or otherwise make distributions and none are expected. The Limited Partners must rely upon their right of redemption to obtain their return of equity after consideration of profits, if any, and losses from the Fund. See the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference, for a complete explanation of the allocation of profits and losses to a Limited Partner's capital account. Following is a summary of certain financial information for the Registrant for the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2010. 7
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2007 2008 2007 2006 Performance per unit (2) Net unit value, beginning of the year $4,083.24 $5,404.76 $3,489.87 $4,175.12 $3,489.87 $3,357.08 Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency 609.02 (753.79) 1,365.97 2,355.63 1,365.97 505.12 Investment income 3.26 6.44 151.43 64.59 151.43 139.17 Expenses (1) (464.38) (574.17) (832.15) (1,190.58) (832.15) (511.50) Net increase (decrease) for the year 147.90 (1,321.52) 685.25 1,229.64 685.25 132.79 Net unit value at the end of the year $4,231.14 $4,083.24 $4,175.12 $5,404.76 $4,175.12 $3,489.87 Net assets at the end of the year ($000) $11,248 $14,711 $18,637 $22,691 $18,637 $17,015 Total return (1) 3.62% (24.45%) 19.64% 29.45% 19.64% 3.94% Number of units outstanding at the end of the year 2,658.37 3,602.89 4,463.75 4,198.35 4,463.75 4,875.48 Supplemental Data: Ratio to average net assets Investment and other income (2) 0.08% 0.13% 4.14% 1.30% 4.14 % 4.22 % Expenses (12.09%) (12.02%) (22.47%) (24.03%) (22.47%) (4.36%) Total return is calculated based on the change in value of a unit during the period. An individual partner's total return and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of additions and redemptions. (1) Includes brokerage commissions (2) For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, investments in other income and expenses and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity transactions are calculated based on a single unit outstanding during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2006, investment and other income and expenses are calculated using the average number of units outstanding during the year. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity transactions is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net unit value. 8
The following summarized quarterly financial information presents the results of operations for the quarterly periods during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009: 2010 2009 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Investment Gain -834,258 -38,405 1,621,977 710,299 -999,419 121,517 -1,136,120 -884,422 Net Income (Loss) -1,243,076 -395,012 1,306,698 381,672 -1,646,440 -477,424 -1,665,087 -1,341,912 Net Income (Loss) per limited partnership unit -349.81 -121.83 476.83 142.71 -393.09 -126.62 -437.54 -364.27 Net Income (Loss) per general partnership unit (if any) - - - - - - - - Net asset value per partnership unit at the end of period. 3,733.43 3,611.60 4,088.43 4,231.14 5,011.67 4,885.05 4,447.51 4,083.24 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The Fund records all investments at market value in its financial statements, with changes in market value reported as a component of realized and change in unrealized trading gain (loss) in the Statements of Operations. In certain circumstances, estimates are involved in determining market value in the absence of an active market closing price (e.g. swap and forward contracts which are traded in the inter-bank market). Capital Resources The Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering, and does not intend to raise any capital through resale of Units once issued or borrowing. Due to the nature of the Fund's business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets. Liquidity Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in commodity futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as 'daily price fluctuation limits' or 'daily limits'. During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has reached the daily limit for that day, positions in that contract can neither be taken nor liquidated. Commodity futures prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if commodity futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices, if little trading in such contracts is taking place. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund's commodity futures trading operations, the Fund's assets are expected to be highly liquid. 9
The entire offering proceeds will be credited to the Fund's bank and brokerage accounts to engage in trading activities and as reserves for that trading. The Fund meets its margin requirements by depositing U.S. government securities or cash or both with the futures broker and the over-the-counter counterparties. In this way, substantially all (i.e., approximately 99% or more) of the Fund's assets, whether used as margin for trading purposes or as reserves for such trading, can be invested in U.S. government securities and time deposits with U.S. banks. Investors should note that maintenance of the Fund's assets in U.S. government securities and banks does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures, forward and swap contracts. The Fund receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Fund assets. Approximately 10% to 40% of the Fund's assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures broker, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury bills in segregated accounts with the futures broker pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. When combined with the previously described assets committed to margin, a total of up to approximately 40% of the Fund's assets may be deposited with over-the- counter counterparties in order to initiate and maintain forward and swap contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparties. The remaining 60% to 90% of the Fund's assets are normally invested in cash equivalents, such as U.S. Treasury bills, and held by the futures broker or the over-the-counter counterparties. The Fund's assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested with or loaned to the Fund, the General Partner or any affiliated entities. Results of Operations The Fund is subject to ongoing offering and operating expenses; however, profits or losses are primarily generated by the commodity trading advisor by methods that are proprietary to it. These results are not to be construed as an expectation of similar profits in the future. The initial start-up costs attendant to the sale of Units by use of a prospectus which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are substantial. The results of the partial year 1999 and the years 2000 through 2010 reflect the absorption of these costs by the Fund. See the Registration Statements, incorporated by reference herein, for an explanation of the operation of the Fund. Registrant's average net assets during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were approximately $21,745,173 , $18,779,313 and $11,737,287 , respectively. The decrease in average net assets of 13.64% from 2008 to 2009 was due to operational (losses) in 2009 of $(5,130,863) and redemptions of $(3,194,039) [offset partially by capital contributions of $345,345]. The decrease in average net assets of 37.50% from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to redemptions of $(3,554,185) [offset partially by $40,361 in capital contributions and $50,282 in operational profits]. The Fund is charged fixed brokerage commissions of 11%, which are calculated on the Fund's total trading equity as of the beginning of each month and, therefore, vary according to monthly trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. The same factors that contribute to increases or decreases in average net assets, therefore, contribute to changes in brokerage commissions paid. The Limited Partnership Agreement grants solely to the General Partner the right to select the trading advisor or advisors and to otherwise manage the operation of the Fund. Clarke Capital Management, Inc. was responsible for the selection of all trades during the three year period covered by this report. Most of the operational profits and losses are directly due to the trading activity of Clarke, though interest income also contributes. As evidenced by the increase in net unit value since inception, from $1,000 in October, 1999 to $4,231 as of December 31, 2010, the Clarke has been successful overall. Over the three year period covered by this report, net unit value changed from $4,175 as of the beginning of 2008, to $5,405 as of December 31, 2008, to $4,083 as of December 31, 2009 to $4,231 as of December 31, 2010. Returns for the years ended December 31 2008, 2009 and 2010 of 29.45%, (24.45)% and 3.62% in 2010 resulted in a net increase of 1.34% in net asset value over the three year period. This corresponds to results after payment and accrual of expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 of profits (losses) of $5,461,179 [1,226.64 per Unit], $(5,130,863) [$(1,321.52) per Unit] and $50,282 [$147.90 per Unit], respectively. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, however. 10
The above described performance was primarily due to the trading of Clarke, which trades for the Fund via its proprietary methods. The general trading strategy of all of Clarke's programs is trend following. Most, but not all, trade initiations and liquidations are in the direction of the trend. All Clarke programs employ techniques that utilize a number of trading models acting independently. Each model generates its own entry and exit signals and trades both sides of the market (long and short). With minor differences only for long or short positions, a particular model trades all markets with the same rules and parameters, regardless of the program. Clarke reserves the right to make adjustments in the exact entry or exit price a model uses for any program or pool, or to delay entry or exit on any order, in order to attempt to reduce the impact of slippage from large block orders being executed at the same or similar prices. The models vary from intermediate through long-term to very long-term in timeframe focus and testing has been done in order to select only those models that have good performance characteristics across a wide range of conditions and complementary performance with all other models in a program. Clarke trades its Alpha program for the Fund, which trades approximately 37 domestic and international commodity interests utilizing twelve models with a medium-to-long time frame, risk control and profit-taking characteristics. Twelve of these commodity interests are either long or short interest rate contracts, reflecting interest rates in Europe, the US, Canada, Japan and Australia. The balance of commodity interests traded include currencies, grains, softs, metals, meats and fuels, both foreign and domestic. These models have been selected for their ability as a group to provide a high return for the amount of exposure or time that a position is held. It should be noted that there will be times when there is significant correlation between markets within a market sector or between market sectors, possibly in an adverse direction to positions held in the client's account. This factor alone, although there are others, will lead to periods of extreme volatility and possibly very large drawdowns in Fund equity. The Alpha program will, at times, have a significantly higher margin to equity ratio than other Clarke programs, and at other times will trade very lightly due to the selectivity of its models. If a large price movement occurs in a sector that a trading advisor trades, such as agriculture, financials, metals or softs, it does not necessarily mean that the trading advisor will engage in trades that capture such moves. Accordingly, market movements and conditions are not necessarily correlated with Fund performance. As always, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Notwithstanding these caveats, commencing with the second quarter of 2011, Clarke will provide to the Fund an analysis of sector by sector trades, which the Fund will summarize in subsequent quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC. Pursuant to the Trading Advisory Agreement, the Fund pays a quarterly incentive fee to Clarke on new net profits, or those profits achieved on a per unit basis above the advisor's previous high water mark. See Note 5 to the financial statements herein for the current incentive fees. As a result of trading profits earned for the Fund in the first two quarters in 2008, Clarke was paid total incentive fees of $2,562,761. Because Clarke has not recouped trading losses incurred since then, it has not been paid an incentive fee in the intervening quarters covered by this report. Operating expenses include accounting, audit, tax, and legal fees, as well as regulatory costs and printing and postage costs related to reports sent to limited partners. Operating expenses during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were $187,552, $149,138 and $124,263, respectively. The decrease over the comparative years from 2008 to 2010 is primarily due to reduction in state registration costs and the fact that accounting costs fluctuate with Fund net assets, which trended lower. As a percentage of net asset value, operational expenses during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were 0.83%, 1.01% and 1.10%, respectively. The balance of the Fund's income that does not derive from the trading activity of Clarke comes from interest income, the rate of which tracks that of the 13 week T-Bill. Interest income is earned on the Fund's assets, either through investment in short-term securities or through its deposits with the clearing broker. The amount of interest income to the Fund varies monthly according to the prevailing short term interest rates themselves and the net assets of the Fund, which fluctuate with Fund performance, subscriptions and redemptions. The 13 week T-Bill rate trended lower over the three year period covered by this report, and was on average 1.33% for the year ended December 31, 2008, 0.14% for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 0.13% for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a percentage of net assets, interest income to the Fund correspondingly trended lower over the same three years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, at 1.24%, 0.17% and 0.09%, respectively. 11
The impact of inflation with respect to the operations or on the financial condition of the Fund is limited to its effect on interest income, inasmuch as short term interest rate policy set by the Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") is, in part, influenced by price inflation measures. Beginning with the September 18, 2007 meeting, the FOMC began lowering the overnight Federal Funds Target Rate from 5.25% to reach an eventual 0.00% to 0.25% target range set on December 16, 2008, where it has been kept since. This has put significant downward pressure on 13 week T-Bill rates, which is closely correlated to the Federal Funds rate, and is the approximate rate at which the Fund receives interest income. Accordingly, inflation has not had a direct material impact with respect to the Fund's operations or financial condition, but decreased reported inflation levels over the three years covered by this report have been concurrent with an accommodative FOMC policy, which has in turn been concurrent with low interest income. Off-Balance Sheet Risk The term 'off-balance sheet risk' refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures, forward and swap contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Fund, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if the Fund's trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Fund, the Fund could lose all of its assets and the Limited Partners would realize a 100% loss. The Fund, the General Partner and the CTAs minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 40%. In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, forward and swap contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. In the case of forward and swap contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions; thus there may be a greater counterparty credit risk. The CTAs trade for the Fund only with those counterparties which they believe to be creditworthy. All positions of the Fund are valued each day on a mark-to-market basis. There can be no assurance that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk The securities of the Fund are not traded and no market for the Fund securities is expected to develop. The Fund is engaged in the speculative trading of futures and options on futures. The risks are fully explained in the Fund prospectus delivered to each prospective partner prior to their investment. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The Fund financial statements as of December 31, 2010 were audited by Patke & Associates, Ltd., 300 Village Green Drive Ste 210, Lincolnshire, IL 60069, and are provided in this Report beginning on page F-1. The supplementary financial information specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is included in Item 6. Selected Financial Data in this Report. 12
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Registrant has adopted procedures in connection with the operation of its business including, but not limited to, the review of account statements sent to the General Partner before the open of business each day that disclose the positions held overnight in the Fund accounts, the margin to hold those positions, and the amount of profit or loss on each position, and the net balance of equity available in each account. The Fund brokerage account statements and financial books and records accounts are prepared by an independent CPA Firm and then are reviewed each quarter and audited each year by a different independent CPA firm. The General Partner of the Fund, under the actions of its sole principal, Michael Pacult, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) with respect to the Fund as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on their evaluation, Mr. Pacult has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the General Partner to evaluate annually the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in all annual reports. There were no changes in the General Partner's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Fund. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Fund's financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by a company's board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The General Partner's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: * pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Fund's assets; * provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the Fund's financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Fund's receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the General Partner's management and directors; and * provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Fund's assets that could have a material effect on the Fund's financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 13
The Fund securities are not publicly traded so that there can be no insider trading or leaks of confidential information to the public. All Fund money is on deposit either with a bank or a futures commission merchant. See Subsequent Events in Item 1 of this Report. There is an audit trail produced by both. A certified public accountant prepares the monthly financial statements. The Fund units are sold during the month at a net asset value to be determined as of the close of business on the last day of trading each month. No information related to the value of the units during the month is available to the Fund sales force or the prospects. All quarterly financial statements are reviewed by an independent certified public accountant who audits the Fund financial statements at the end of each calendar year. The Fund maintains its subscription agreements and other records for six years. The management of the General Partner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting with respect to the Fund as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control ' Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, the General Partner's internal control over financial reporting with respect to the Fund is effective based on those criteria. Item 9B. Other Information. None. Part III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance The Fund is a Delaware Limited Partnership which acts through its corporate and individual general partner. Accordingly, the Registrant has no Directors or Executive Officers. The General Partners of the Registrant are Ashley Capital Management, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, and Mr. Michael P. Pacult. The General Partners are both registered with the National Futures Association as commodity pool operators pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act, and Mr. Pacult, age 66, is the sole shareholder, director, registered principal and executive officer of the corporate General Partner. The background and qualifications of Mr. Pacult are disclosed in the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference. There has never been a material administrative, civil or criminal action brought against the Fund, the General Partner or any of its directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons. No Forms 3, 4, or 5 have been furnished to the Registrant since inception. To the best of the Fund's knowledge, no such forms have been or are required to be filed. Audit Committee Financial Expert Mr. Pacult, in his capacity as the sole principal for the General Partner of the Fund, has determined that he qualifies as an 'audit committee financial expert' in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. He is not independent of management. Code of Ethics The Fund General Partner is registered with the National Futures Association as a Commodity Pool Operator and its President, Michael P. Pacult is registered as its principal. Both the Fund and the General Partner are subject to Federal Commodity Exchange Act and audit for compliance and the rules of good practice of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the industry self regulatory organization, the National Futures Association. Having said that, neither the Commodity Futures Trading Commission nor the National Futures Association is responsible for the quality of the Fund disclosures or its operation, as those functions are exclusively the responsibility of the Fund and its General Partner. 14
Item 11. Executive Compensation. Although there are no executives of the Fund, the corporate General Partner is paid compensation that the Fund has elected to disclose on this Form 10-K. The Fund pays its corporate General Partner fixed brokerage commissions of eleven percent (11%) per year, payable monthly, from which it pays its affiliated introducing broker, Futures Investment Company, seven percent (7%) of the eleven percent (11%) to cover the cost of the trades entered by the CTA. The corporate General Partner retains the difference between the seven percent (7%) it pays to the introducing broker and the eleven percent (11%) it is paid. All compensation is disclosed in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. (a) The following Partners owned more than five percent (5%) of the total equity of the Fund as of December 31, 2010: Name Percent Ownership None N/A (b) As of December 31, 2010, neither the individual nor corporate General Partner owned any Units of Limited Partnership Interests. (c) The Limited Partnership Agreement governs the terms upon which control of the Fund may change. No change in ownership of the Units will, alone, determine the location of control. The Limited Partners must have 120 days advance notice and the opportunity to redeem prior to any change in the control from the General Partner to another general partner. Control of the management of the Fund may never vest in one or more Limited Partners. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. See Item 11, Executive Compensation and Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. The General Partner has sole discretion over the selection of trading advisors. Ashley Capital Management, Inc., the corporate General Partner, is paid a fixed commission for trades and, therefore, both General Partners have a potential conflict in the selection of a trading advisor who makes few trades rather than produces profits for the Fund. This conflict and others are fully disclosed in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Only fees to the Principal Accountant, or Auditor, and not fees for other accounting, are required to be disclosed in this section. (1) Audit Fees The fees and costs paid to Patke and Associates, Ltd. for the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements, for review of financial statements included in the Fund's Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filing or engagements (i.e., consents related to SEC registration statements) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $20,090 and $25,127, respectively. (2) Audit Related Fees None 15
(3) Tax Fees The aggregate fees paid to Patke and Associates, Ltd. for tax compliance services including tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $5,500 and $5,000, respectively. (4) All Other Fees None (5) The Board of Directors of Ashley Capital Management, Inc., General Partner of the Fund, approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors has determined that the payments made to its independent certified public accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors' independence. The Board of Directors explicitly pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms. (6) Close to 100% of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time permanent employees. However, all work performed was supervised by a full-time permanent employee. Part IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: 1. All Financial Statements The Financial Statements begin on page F-1 of this report. 2. Financial Statement Schedules required to be filed by Item 8 of this form, and by paragraph (b) below. Not applicable, not required, or included in the Financial Statements. 3. List of those Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K (Sec 229.601 of this chapter) and by paragraph (b) below. Incorporated by reference from the Fund's Registration Statement on Form S-1, and all amendments at file Nos. 333-61217 and 333-59976 previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 31.1 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 302 32.2 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 (b) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K (Sec 229.601 of this chapter). See response to 15(a)(3), above. (c) Financial statements required by Regulation S-X (17 CFR 210) which are excluded from the annual report to shareholders by Rule 14a-3(b) including (1) separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated and fifty percent or less owned persons; (2) separate financial statements of affiliates whose securities are pledged as collateral; and (3) schedules. None. 16
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Registrant: Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership By Ashley Capital Management, Inc. Its General Partner By: /s/ Michael Pacult Mr. Michael P. Pacult Sole Director, Sole Shareholder President and Treasurer Date: March 30, 2011 17
ATLAS FUTURES FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (A Delaware Limited Partnership) ANNUAL REPORT December 31, 2010 GENERAL PARTNER: Ashley Capital Management, Inc. % Corporate Systems, Inc. 505 Brookfield Drive Dover, Kent County, Delaware 19901
Index to the Financial Statements Page Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2 Statements of Assets and Liabilities F-3 Condensed Schedule of Investments - December 31, 2010 F-4 Condensed Schedule of Investments - December 31, 2009 F-5 Statements of Operations F-6 Statements of Changes in Net Assets F-7 Statements of Cash Flows F-8 Notes to the Financial Statements F-9 - F-15 Affirmation of the Commodity Pool Operator F-16 F-1
Patke & Associates, Ltd. Certified Public Accountants Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Partners of Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership Dover, Delaware We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (a Delaware limited partnership), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion of the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. An audit includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations, its changes in net assets and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Patke & Associates, Ltd. Patke & Associates, Ltd. Lincolnshire, Illinois February 24, 2011 300 Village Green Drive, Suite 210 * Lincolnshire, Illinois 60069 *(847)913-5400 F-2
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Statements of Assets and Liabilities December 31, 2010 and 2009 2010 2009 Assets Investments Cash and cash equivalents at broker $4,513,906 $4,359,494 Net unrealized gain on open futures contracts 647,664 - Total equity in broker trading accounts 5,161,570 4,359,494 U.S. Treasury Bills (cost $4,998,420 and $9,997,725) 4,999,789 9,998,497 Cash 196,788 120,240 Money market fund 1,001,067 501,014 Prepaid expenses 4,124 11,395 Total assets 11,363,338 14,990,640 Liabilities Partner redemptions payable 64,059 168,311 Accrued commissions payable to related parties 36,291 86,485 Other accrued liabilities 15,052 24,366 Total liabilities 115,402 279,162 Net assets $11,247,936 $14,711,478 Analysis of net assets Limited partners $11,247,936 $14,711,478 General partners - - Net assets (equivalent to $4,231.14 and $4,083.24 per unit) $11,247,936 $14,711,478 Partnership units outstanding Limited partners units outstanding 2,658.37 3,602.89 General partners units outstanding - - Total partnership units outstanding 2,658.37 3,602.89 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-3
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Condensed Schedule of Investments December 31, 2010 Face Value Fair Value Percent of Net Assets United States Treasury bills United States Treasury bills, matures January 2011 (cost $4,998,420) $5,000,000 $4,999,789 44.45% Futures contracts Futures contracts held long Agriculture $279,103 2.48% Metals 900 0.01% Energy 90,000 0.80% Currency 233,955 2.08% Total futures contracts held long 603,958 5.37% Futures contracts held short Currency 43,706 0.39% Total futures contracts held short 43,706 0.39% Net unrealized gain on open futures contracts $647,664 5.76% The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-4
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Condensed Schedule of Investments December 31, 2009 Face Value Fair Value Percent of Net Assets United States Treasury bills United States Treasury bills, matures January 2010 $5,000,000 $4,999,872 United States Treasury bills, matures April 2010 5,000,000 4,998,625 Total United States Treasury bills (cost $9,997,725) $9,998,497 67.96% The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-5
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 2010 2009 2008 Investment income Interest income $9,957 $25,287 $282,259 Total investment income 9,957 25,287 282,259 Expenses Commission expense 1,295,025 2,108,568 2,474,512 Management fees - - - Incentive fees - - 2,562,761 Professional fees 102,900 135,300 150,500 Other operating expenses 21,363 13,838 37,052 Total expenses 1,419,288 2,257,706 5,224,825 Net investment (loss) (1,409,331) (2,232,419) (4,942,566) Realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments 814,678 (2,928,481) 10,385,993 Foreign currency transactions (2,729) 30,037 17,752 Net realized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions 811,949 (2,898,444) 10,403,745 Net unrealized appreciation on investments 647,664 - - Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency 1,459,613 (2,898,444) 10,403,745 Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations $50,282 $(5,130,863) $5,461,179 Net income (loss) per unit (for a single unit outstanding during the entire year) Limited partnership unit $147.90 $(1,321.52) $1,229.64 General partnership unit $- $- $- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-6
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Statements of Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 2010 2009 2008 Units Net Assets Units Net Assets Units Net Assets Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations Net investment (loss) $(1,409,331) $(2,232,419) $(4,942,566) Net realized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions 811,949 (2,898,444) 10,403,745 Net unrealized appreciation on investments 647,664 - - Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations 50,282 (5,130,863) 5,461,179 Capital contributions from limited partners 10.44 40,361 65.09 345,345 78.15 411,613 Redemptions by limited partners (954.96) (3,554,185) (660.55) (3,194,039) (343.56) (1,818,467) Total increase (decrease) in net assets (944.52) (3,463,542) (595.46) (7,979,557) (265.41) 4,054,325 Net assets at the beginning of the year 3,602.89 14,711,478 4,198.35 22,691,035 4,463.76 18,636,710 Net assets at the end of the year 2,658.37 $11,247,936 3,602.89 $14,711,478 4,198.35 $22,691,035 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-7
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 2010 2009 2008 Cash Flows from Operating Activities Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations $50,282 $(5,130,863) $5,461,179 Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Unrealized (appreciation) on investments (647,664) - - (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses 7,271 (11,395) - Decrease in interest receivable - 203 43,906 Increase (decrease) in accrued commissions payable to related parties (50,194) (65,452) 144,593 (Decrease) in incentive fees payable - (57,490) (599,788) Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities (9,314) 466 1,820 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (649,619) (5,264,531) 5,051,710 Cash Flows from Financing Activities Proceeds from sale of units 40,361 345,345 411,613 Partner redemptions (3,658,437) (3,026,755) (1,871,257) Net cash (used in) financing activities (3,618,076) (2,681,410) (1,459,644) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (4,267,695) (7,945,941) 3,592,066 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 14,979,245 22,925,186 19,333,120 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $10,711,550 $14,979,245 $22,925,186 End of period cash and cash equivalents consist of: Cash at broker $4,513,906 $4,359,494 $7,826,204 Treasury bills 4,999,789 9,998,497 14,997,985 Cash 196,788 120,240 99,988 Money market fund 1,001,067 501,014 1,009 Total cash and cash equivalents $10,711,550 $14,979,245 $22,925,186 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. F-8
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 1. Nature of the Business Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (the "Fund") was formed January 12, 1998 under the laws of the state of Delaware. The Fund is engaged in the speculative trading of futures contracts in commodities, which commenced in October, 1999. Ashley Capital Management, Inc. (the "Corporate General Partner") and Michael Pacult (the "Individual General Partner" and collectively the "General Partner") are the General Partners and the commodity pool operators ("CPO's") of the Fund. The sole registered commodity trading advisor ("CTA") of the fund is Clarke Capital Management, Inc. ("Clarke"). The Fund has filed an S-1 registration statement to register an additional $10,000,000 in Units. Upon effectiveness, the Units will be offered and sold pursuant to a prospectus under similar terms to the previous offering; however, there will be compensation to the affiliated selling agent, Futures Investment Company, of an up front selling commission of 1% calculated on the gross subscription amount in addition to $2,000 paid by the Fund for legal fees associated with the review of the offering by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). The Fund is a registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"). The Fund is subject to the regulations of the SEC and the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Fund is also subject to the regulations of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), an agency of the U.S. government which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry, the rules of the National Futures Association and the requirements of various commodity exchanges where the Fund executes transactions. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the requirements of futures commission merchants ("FCM's") and interbank market makers through which the Fund trades and regulated by commodity exchanges and by exchange markets that may be traded by the advisor. 2. Significant Accounting Policies Registration Costs - Costs incurred for the initial filings with the SEC, FINRA and the states where the offering was made were accumulated, deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of offering at the initial closing as part of the offering expense. The Fund remains open to new partners, and incurs costs required to retain the ability to issue new units. Such costs, in addition to the costs of recurring annual and quarterly filings with regulatory agencies are expensed as incurred. Revenue Recognition - Commodity futures contracts are recorded on the trade date and are reflected in the statement of assets and liabilities at the difference between the original contract amount and the market value on the last business day of the reporting period. Market value of commodity futures contracts is based upon exchange or other applicable market best available closing quotations. Interest income is recognized when it is earned. Use of Accounting Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. F-9
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 2. Significant Accounting Policies - Continued Foreign Currency - The accounting records of the Fund are denominated in U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the valuation date. Commodity futures contract transactions are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. On the accompanying financial statements, effects of changes in exchange rates from all transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are disclosed separately. Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures - Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability, including the Fund?s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Fund did not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities. The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Fund?s investments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Fair Value at December 31, 2010 Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Money Market Accounts $1,001,067 $- $- $1,001,067 U.S. Treasury Bills - 4,999,789 - 4,999,789 Exchange Traded - Futures Contracts 647,664 - - 647,664 Total $1,648,731 $4,999,789 $- $6,648,520 Fair Value at December 31, 2009 Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Money Market Accounts $501,014 $- $- $501,014 U.S. Treasury Bills - 9,998,497 - 9,998,497 Total $501,014 $9,998,497 $- $10,499,511 In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 ("ASU 2010-06") for improving disclosure about fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 adds new disclosure requirements about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). It also clarifies existing disclosure requirements relating to the levels of disaggregation for fair value measurement and inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. As of January 1, 2010, the Fund adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-06 except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Fund?s financial statements. Income Taxes - The Fund prepares calendar year U.S. Federal and applicable state information tax returns and reports to the partners their allocable shares of the Fund?s income, expenses and trading gains or losses. No provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements as each partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on such partner?s respective share of the Fund?s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes. Management has continued to evaluate the application of ASC 740, ?Income Taxes" to the Fund, and has determined that ASC 740 does not have a material impact on the Fund?s financial statements. The Fund files federal and state tax returns. The 2007 through 2010 tax years generally remain subject to examination by the U.S. federal and most state tax authorities. Statement of Cash Flows - For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Fund considers money market funds and U.S. Treasury Bills to be cash equivalents. Net cash provided by operating activities includes no cash payments for interest or income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Reclassifications - Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to current year presentation. F-10
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 3. General Partner Duties The responsibilities of the General Partner, in addition to directing the trading and investment activity of the Fund, include executing and filing all necessary legal documents, statements and certificates of the Fund, retaining independent public accountants to audit the Fund, employing attorneys to represent the Fund, reviewing the brokerage commission rates to determine reasonableness, maintaining the tax status of the Fund as a limited partnership, maintaining a current list of names, addresses and numbers of units owned by each limited partner and taking such other actions as deemed necessary or desirable to manage the business of the Fund. If the daily net unit value of the Fund falls to less than 50% of the highest value earned through trading at the close of any month, then the General Partner will immediately suspend all trading, provide all limited partners with notice of the reduction and give all limited partners the opportunity, for fifteen days after such notice, to redeem partnership interests. No trading will commence until after the lapse of the fifteen day period. 4. Limited Partnership Agreement The Limited Partnership Agreement provides, among other things, that: Capital Account - A capital account shall be established for each partner. The initial balance of each partner's capital account shall be the amount of the initial contributions to the Fund. Monthly Allocations - Any increase or decrease in the Fund's net asset value as of the end of a month shall be credited or charged to the capital account of each partner in the ratio that the balance of each account bears to the total balance of all accounts. Any distribution from profits or partners' capital will be made solely at the discretion of the General Partner. Federal Income Tax Allocations - As of the end of each fiscal year, the Fund's realized capital gain or loss and ordinary income or loss shall be allocated among the partners, after having given effect to the fees and expenses of the Fund. Subscriptions - Investors must submit subscription agreements and funds at least five business days prior to month end. Subscriptions must be accepted or rejected by the General Partner within five business days. The investor also has five business days to withdraw his subscription. Funds are deposited into an interest bearing subscription account and will be transferred to the Fund's account on the first business day of the month after the subscription is accepted. Interest earned on the subscription funds will accrue to the account of the investor. Redemptions - After holding the investment for a minimum of twelve months, a limited partner may request any or all of his investment be redeemed at the net asset value as of the end of a month. The written request must be received by the General Partner no less than ten days prior to a month end. Redemptions will generally be paid within twenty days of the effective month end. However, in various circumstances due to liquidity, etc. the General Partner may be unable to comply with the request on a timely basis. 5. Fees The Fund charged the following fees: The Corporate General Partner is entitled to a fixed annual brokerage commission of 11% of assets on deposit with the FCM for domestic trades plus actual commissions charged by the FCM for trades made on foreign exchanges and forward markets, if any. It receives 4% of the commissions and the Fund pays the introducing broker the remaining 7%. A quarterly incentive fee of 25% of "new net profits" is paid to Clarke. There were no incentive fees for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The General Partner reserves the right to change the fee structure at its sole discretion. F-11
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 6. Related Party Transactions The Fund pays commissions to the Corporate General Partner and Futures Investment Company, the introducing broker. These related parties are 100% and 50%, respectively, owned by Michael Pacult. Related party commissions were as follows: Commissions included in expense: For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Corporate General Partner $470,434 $766,090 $898,144 Futures Investment Company 792,054 1,251,360 1,423,668 Total related party expenses $1,262,488 $2,017,450 $2,321,812 Commissions included in accrued expenses: December 31, December 31, 2010 2009 Corporate General Partner $6,173 $51,924 Futures Investment Company 30,118 34,561 Total accrued commissions payable to related parties $36,291 $86,485 In the normal course of business, the Fund has provided general indemnifications to the General Partner, its CTA and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of the Fund. The Fund is unable to develop an estimate for future payments resulting from hypothetical claims, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these indemnifications to be remote. F-12
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 7. Trading Activities and Related Risks The Fund is engaged in speculative trading of U.S. and foreign futures contracts in commodities. The Fund is exposed to both market risk, the risk arising from changes in market value of the contracts, and credit risk, the risk of failure by another party to perform according to the terms of a contract. A certain portion of cash in trading accounts are pledged as collateral for commodities trading on margin. Additional deposits may be necessary for any loss on contract value. The Commodity Exchange Act requires a broker to segregate all customer transactions and assets from such broker's proprietary activities. Each U.S. commodity exchange with the approval of the CFTC establishes minimum margin requirements for each traded contract. The FCM may increase the margin requirements above these minimums for any or all contracts. The Fund maintains cash and cash equivalents to satisfy these margin requirements. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $10,711,550 and $14,979,245, respectively. Based upon the types and amounts of contracts traded and the amount of liquid assets of the Fund, the General Partner believes there is minimal risk of not being able to meet its margin requirement. Trading in futures contracts involves entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell a particular commodity at a specified date and price. The gross or face amount of the contract, which is typically many times that of the Fund's net assets being traded, significantly exceeds the Fund's future cash requirements since the Fund intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, the Fund is generally subject only to the risk of loss arising from the change in the value of the contracts. The market risk is limited to the gross or face amount of the contracts held of approximately $47,695,198 and $0 on long positions at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. However, when the Fund enters into a contractual commitment to sell commodities, it must make delivery of the underlying commodity at the contract price and then repurchase the contract at prevailing market prices or settle in cash. Since the repurchase price to which a commodity can rise is unlimited, entering into commitments to sell commodities exposes the Fund to unlimited potential risk. Market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors including government programs and policies, political and economic events, the level and volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, the diversification effects among the derivative instruments the Fund holds and the liquidity and inherent volatility of the markets in which the Fund trades. The net unrealized gains on open commodity futures contracts at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $647,664 and $0 respectively. Open contracts generally mature within three months of December 31, 2010. The latest maturity for open futures contracts is in March 2011. However the Fund intends to close all contracts prior to maturity. F-13
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 7. Trading Activities and Related Risks - Continued The following tables disclose the fair values of derivative and hedging activities in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities and the Statements of Operations. Derivative Instruments Statement of Assets and Liabilities Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives at December31, at December 31, Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location 2010 Fair Value 2010 Fair Value Net Derivatives not designated as Futures contracts Net unrealized gain (loss) on open $651,883 $(4,219) $647,664 hedge instruments under ASC 815 futures contracts Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives at December31, at December 31, Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location 2009 Fair Value 2009 Fair Value Net Derivatives not designated as Futures contracts Net unrealized gain (loss) on open $- $- $- hedge instruments under ASC 815 futures contracts Derivative Instruments Statement of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, Line Item in the Statement of Operations 2010 2009 2008 Derivatives not designated as Futures contracts Net realized gain (loss) from investments $811,949 $(2,898,444) $10,403,745 hedge instruments under ASC 815 and foreign currency transactions Derivatives not designated as Futures contracts Net unrealized appreciation from $647,664 $- $- hedge instruments under ASC 815 investments Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counter party to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Fund has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions. In the event of a financial institution's insolvency, recovery of Fund deposits may be limited to account insurance or other protection afforded deposits. The Fund has established procedures to actively monitor market risk and minimize credit risk although there can be no assurance that it will succeed. The basic market risk control procedures consist of continuously monitoring open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a desirable margin-to-equity ratio. The Fund seeks to minimize credit risk primarily by depositing and maintaining its assets at financial institutions and brokers which it believes to be creditworthy. 8. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Credit and Market Risk All financial instruments are subject to market risk, the risk that future changes in market conditions may make an instrument less valuable or more onerous. As the instruments are recognized at fair market value, those changes directly affect reported income. Included in the definition of financial instruments are securities, restricted securities and derivative financial instruments. Theoretically, the investments owned by the Fund directly are exposed to a market risk (loss) equal to the notional value of the financial instruments purchased and substantial liability on certain financial instruments purchased short. Generally, financial instruments can be closed. However, if the market is not liquid, it could prevent the timely close-out of any unfavorable positions or require the Fund to hold those positions to maturity, regardless of the changes in their value or the trading advisor?s investment strategies. Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. 9. Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments A derivative financial instrument is a financial agreement whose value is linked to, or derived from, the performance of an underlying asset. The underlying asset can be currencies, commodities, interest rates, stocks, or any combination. Changes in the underlying asset indirectly affect the value of the derivative. As the instruments are recognized at fair value, those changes directly affect reported income. All investment holdings are recorded in the statement of assets and liabilities at their net asset value (fair value) at the reporting date. Financial instruments (including derivatives) used for trading purposes are recorded in the statement of assets and liabilities at fair value at the reporting date. Realized and unrealized changes in fair values are recognized in net investment gain (loss) in the period in which the changes occur. Interest income arising from trading instruments is included in the statement of operations as part of interest income. Notional amounts are equivalent to the aggregate face value of the derivative financial instruments. Notional amounts do not represent the amounts exchanged by the parties to derivatives and do not measure the Fund?s exposure to credit or market risks. The amounts exchanged are based on the notional amounts and other terms of the derivatives. F-14
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership) Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010 10. Indemnifications In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Fund?s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. The Fund expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote. 11. Subsequent Events Effective February 10, 2011 the trades selected by Clarke began being cleared by Vision Financial Markets LLC. Trades continue to be introduced by Futures Investment Company. No further trades will be placed through MF Global Inc. All trading decisions continue to be made by Clarke and this change will not have any impact on its trading decisions. 12. Financial Highlights For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2007 2008 2007 2006 Performance per unit (2) Net unit value, beginning of the year $4,083.24 $5,404.76 $3,489.87 $4,175.12 $3,489.87 $3,357.08 Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency 609.02 (753.79) 1,365.97 2,355.63 1,365.97 505.12 Investment income 3.26 6.44 151.43 64.59 151.43 139.17 Expenses (1) (464.38) (574.17) (832.15) (1,190.58) (832.15) (511.50) Net increase (decrease) for the year 147.90 (1,321.52) 685.25 1,229.64 685.25 132.79 Net unit value at the end of the year $4,231.14 $4,083.24 $4,175.12 $5,404.76 $4,175.12 $3,489.87 Net assets at the end of the year ($000) $11,248 $14,711 $18,637 $22,691 $18,637 $17,015 Total return (1) 3.62% (24.45%) 19.64% 29.45% 19.64% 3.94% Number of units outstanding at the end of the year 2,658.37 3,602.89 4,463.75 4,198.35 4,463.75 4,875.48 Supplemental Data: Ratio to average net assets Investment and other income (2) 0.08% 0.13% 4.14% 1.30% 4.14 % 4.22 % Expenses (12.09%) (12.02%) (22.47%) (24.03%) (22.47%) (4.36%) Total return is calculated based on the change in value of a unit during the period. An individual partner's total return and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of additions and redemptions. (1) Includes brokerage commissions (2) For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, investments in other income and expenses and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity transactions are calculated based on a single unit outstanding during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2006, investment and other income and expenses are calculated using the average number of units outstanding during the year. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity transactions is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net unit value. F-15
Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership Affirmation of the Commodity Pool Operator For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 200 ***************************************************************************** To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained in this report is accurate and complete. /s/ Michael Pacult Michael Pacult President, Ashley Capital Management, Inc. General Partner Atlas Futures Fund, Limited Partnership F-16