Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc. | c63008exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc. | c63008exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc. | c63008exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc. | c63008exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q/A
(Amendment
No. 1)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-52588
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Missouri | 43-1823071 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
10401 Clayton Road Frontenac, Missouri (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
63131 (Zip Code) |
(314) 569-7200
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer: o | Accelerated filer: o | Non-accelerated filer: o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 11, 2010, the Registrant had 21,023,694 shares of outstanding Class A common stock, $0.25
par value; 40,000 shares of outstanding Class A preferred stock, no par value; 2,000 shares of
outstanding Class B preferred stock, no par value; and 380 shares of outstanding Class C preferred
stock, no par value.
Table of Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE RESTATEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q (Amendment No. 1) is being filed by Reliance Bancshares, Inc.
(the Company) to amend and restate its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 14, 2010 (the
Initial Form 10-Q). For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, and in accordance with
Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), Items 1 and 2 under Part I of
our Initial Form 10-Q have been amended and restated in their entirety. In addition, Item 4T is
being amended solely to add new certifications in accordance with Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange
Act. Other than the Items outlined above, there are no changes to the Initial Form 10-Q. Except as
otherwise specifically noted, all information contained herein is as of March 31, 2010 and does not
reflect any events or changes that have occurred subsequent to that date. We are not required to
and we have not updated any forward-looking statements previously included in the Initial Form 10-Q
filed on May 14, 2010. We have not amended, and do not intend to amend, any of our other previously
filed reports for the periods affected by the restatement. Our previously issued interim condensed
consolidated financial statements included in those reports should no longer be relied upon.
This Amendment No. 1 is required due to certain disclosure omissions in the Initial Form 10-Q
related to net losses available to common shareholders after increasing the net loss for preferred
dividends paid by the Company, which required an adjustment of the previously reported net loss per
share data included in the Companys interim condensed consolidated statement of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
These restatements had no effect on the Companys consolidated net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 or its consolidated stockholders equity as of March 31, 2010. Net loss available to
common shareholders, after increasing the loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company,
increased from the $(0.12) per share originally disclosed to $(0.15) per share as restated, for
both basic and fully-diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
For the convenience of the reader, this Quarterly Report sets forth the original filing in its
entirety.
For additional information regarding the restatement, see Note 1 to our interim condensed
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report.
This Amendment No. 1 includes changes in Item 4T Controls and Procedures and reflects
managements restated assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31,
2010. This restatement of managements assessment regarding disclosure controls and procedures
results from material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the
above described restatements. The information required in this restatement was previously omitted
and, while it had no effect on the Companys consolidated net loss for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and stockholders equity as of March 31, 2010, such information should have been disclosed
in our March 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements. The Company has implemented certain
changes in our internal controls as of the date of this report to address these material
weaknesses, and believe such weaknesses have been remediated. There can be no assurance that our
remedial efforts will be effective nor can there be any assurances that the Company
will not incur losses due to internal or external acts intended to defraud, misappropriate assets,
or circumvent applicable law or our system of internal controls. See Item 4T Controls and
Procedures.
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
Part I
Item 1 Financial Statements
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2010 and 2009 and December 31, 2009
March 31, | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 11,488,611 | 9,900,850 | 11,928,668 | ||||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions |
43,486,792 | 2,820,878 | 15,767,862 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold |
| 1,351,000 | | |||||||||
Investments in available-for-sale debt and equity securities, at fair value |
238,712,309 | 288,723,123 | 284,119,556 | |||||||||
Loans |
1,104,653,035 | 1,235,360,011 | 1,140,881,275 | |||||||||
Less Deferred loan fees/costs |
(43,964 | ) | (612,034 | ) | (84,741 | ) | ||||||
Reserve for possible loan losses |
(32,717,084 | ) | (14,196,047 | ) | (32,221,569 | ) | ||||||
Net loans |
1,071,891,987 | 1,220,551,930 | 1,108,574,965 | |||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
41,686,176 | 43,687,967 | 42,210,536 | |||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
5,290,542 | 6,653,744 | 5,647,887 | |||||||||
Other real estate owned |
33,451,884 | 15,489,980 | 29,085,943 | |||||||||
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $111,301, $95,013 and $107,229 at March 31, 2010 and 2009,
and December 31, 2009, respectively |
133,018 | 149,306 | 137,090 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
1,149,192 | 1,149,192 | 1,149,192 | |||||||||
Other assets |
37,724,360 | 16,681,404 | 38,085,885 | |||||||||
$ | 1,485,014,871 | 1,607,159,374 | 1,536,707,584 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing |
$ | 57,287,630 | 52,601,034 | 71,829,581 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing |
1,155,394,912 | 1,214,792,775 | 1,194,230,616 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
1,212,682,542 | 1,267,393,809 | 1,266,060,197 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
19,776,971 | 17,157,546 | 12,696,932 | |||||||||
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
99,000,000 | 136,000,000 | 104,000,000 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,954,220 | 3,591,620 | 2,194,952 | |||||||||
Other liabilities |
3,377,511 | 2,771,897 | 2,086,079 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,336,791,244 | 1,426,914,872 | 1,387,038,160 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized: |
||||||||||||
Series A, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding |
40,000,000 | 40,000,000 | 40,000,000 | |||||||||
Series B, 2,000 shares issued and outstanding |
2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||||||||
Series C, 380 and 300 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively |
380,000 | | 300,000 | |||||||||
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized,
20,972,091, 20,770,781, and 20,972,091 shares issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively |
5,243,023 | 5,192,696 | 5,243,023 | |||||||||
Surplus |
121,888,348 | 122,331,181 | 122,334,757 | |||||||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
(22,295,101 | ) | 10,753,950 | (19,796,396 | ) | |||||||
Treasury stock, 24,514 shares at March 31, 2009 |
| (335,280 | ) | | ||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income net unrealized
holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities |
1,007,357 | 301,955 | (411,960 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
148,223,627 | 180,244,502 | 149,669,424 | |||||||||
$ | 1,485,014,871 | 1,607,159,374 | 1,536,707,584 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
(restated) 2010 |
2009 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 15,452,027 | 17,671,243 | |||||
Interest on debt securities: |
||||||||
Taxable |
1,833,350 | 1,955,985 | ||||||
Exempt from Federal income taxes |
306,262 | 340,054 | ||||||
Interest on short-term investments |
16,555 | 16,963 | ||||||
Total interest income |
17,608,194 | 19,984,245 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
5,790,589 | 9,482,976 | ||||||
Interest on short-term borrowings |
30,419 | 260,288 | ||||||
Interest on long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
968,919 | 1,231,970 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
6,789,927 | 10,975,234 | ||||||
Net interest income |
10,818,267 | 9,009,011 | ||||||
Provision for possible loan losses |
7,692,000 | 2,250,000 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses |
3,126,267 | 6,759,011 | ||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
224,476 | 207,638 | ||||||
Net gains on sale of debt securities |
64,691 | | ||||||
Other noninterest income |
365,415 | 327,131 | ||||||
Total noninterest income |
654,582 | 534,769 | ||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
3,264,982 | 3,880,456 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
1,087,020 | 1,125,932 | ||||||
Other real estate expense |
1,373,787 | 309,663 | ||||||
FDIC assessments |
784,518 | 503,533 | ||||||
Data processing |
432,543 | 474,674 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,072 | 4,072 | ||||||
Other noninterest expenses |
807,590 | 942,802 | ||||||
Total noninterest expense |
7,754,512 | 7,241,132 | ||||||
Income (loss) before applicable income taxes |
(3,973,663 | ) | 52,648 | |||||
Applicable income tax benefit |
(1,474,958 | ) | (38,226 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Preferred
stock dividends |
(548,891 | ) | | |||||
Net income
(loss) available to common shareholders |
(3,047,596 | ) | 90,874 | |||||
Per share amounts: |
||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.15 | ) | < 0.01 | ||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
20,972,091 | 20,746,267 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.15 | ) | <0.01 | ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
20,972,091 | 20,818,840 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Other comprehensive income before tax: |
||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities |
2,215,171 | 616,492 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustments on available-for-sale security
gains included in net loss |
(64,691 | ) | | |||||
Other comprehensive income before tax |
2,150,480 | 616,492 | ||||||
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income |
731,163 | 209,607 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
1,419,317 | 406,885 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (1,079,388 | ) | 497,759 | ||||
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
Accumulated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings | other | stock- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | (accumulated | Treasury | comprehensive | holders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
stock | stock | Surplus | deficit) | stock | income | equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | | 5,192,696 | 124,193,318 | 10,663,076 | (335,280 | ) | (104,930 | ) | 139,608,880 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 90,874 | | | 90,874 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 40,000 shares of
Series A preferred stock |
40,000,000 | | | | | | 40,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants for 2,000
shares of Series B preferred stock |
2,000,000 | | (2,000,000 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuance costs |
| | (7,422 | ) | | | | (7,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation cost recognized for
stock options granted |
| | 137,785 | | | | 137,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock |
| | 7,500 | | | | 7,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation of
available-for-sale securities,
net of related tax effect |
| | | | | 406,885 | 406,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 42,000,000 | 5,192,696 | 122,331,181 | 10,753,950 | (335,280 | ) | 301,955 | 180,244,502 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 42,300,000 | 5,243,023 | 122,334,757 | (19,796,396 | ) | | (411,960 | ) | 149,669,424 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (2,498,705 | ) | | | (2,498,705 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 80 shares of
Series C preferred stock |
80,000 | | | | | | 80,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
| | (548,891 | ) | | | | (548,891 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuance costs |
| | (8,906 | ) | | | | (8,906 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense |
| | 96,857 | | | | 96,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock |
| | 14,531 | | | | 14,531 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation of
available-for-sale securities,
net of related tax effect |
| | | | | 1,419,317 | 1,419,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 42,380,000 | 5,243,023 | 121,888,348 | (22,295,101 | ) | | 1,007,357 | 148,223,627 | |||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
946,072 | 1,288,475 | ||||||
Provision for possible loan losses |
7,692,000 | 2,250,000 | ||||||
Net gains on sale of debt securities |
(64,691 | ) | | |||||
Net losses on sales and writedowns of other real estate owned |
774,301 | 110,000 | ||||||
Stock option compensation cost |
96,857 | 137,785 | ||||||
Amortization of restricted stock expense |
14,531 | 7,500 | ||||||
Mortgage loans originated for sale in the secondary market |
(5,082,589 | ) | (10,770,860 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans sold in the secondary market |
4,802,789 | 11,366,360 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable |
357,345 | (1,229,636 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
(240,732 | ) | (313,321 | ) | ||||
Other operating activities, net |
921,794 | (535,429 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
7,718,972 | 2,401,748 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of available-for-sale debt securities |
(11,087,421 | ) | (153,186,749 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale debt securities |
51,565,291 | 58,177,906 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale debt securities |
6,738,269 | | ||||||
Net decrease in loans |
23,513,337 | 16,271,700 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
617,199 | 222,972 | ||||||
Construction expenditures to finish other real estate owned |
| (12,308 | ) | |||||
Purchase of premises and equipment, net |
(11,361 | ) | (126,296 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
71,335,314 | (78,652,775 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
(53,377,655 | ) | 39,346,510 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
7,080,039 | (46,761,298 | ) | |||||
Payments of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
(5,000,000 | ) | | |||||
Issuance of preferred stock |
80,000 | 40,000,000 | ||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(548,891 | ) | | |||||
Payment of stock issuance costs |
(8,906 | ) | (7,422 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(51,775,413 | ) | 32,577,790 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
27,278,873 | (43,673,237 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
27,696,530 | 57,745,965 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 54,975,403 | 14,072,728 | |||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 7,030,659 | 11,288,555 | |||||
Noncash transactions: |
||||||||
Warrant exercise and issuance of Series B preferred stock |
| 2,000,000 | ||||||
Transfers to other real estate owned in settlement of loans |
5,757,441 | 672,985 | ||||||
Loans made to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned |
| 151,511 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) provides a full range of banking services to individual
and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and
southwestern Florida through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, F.S.B.
(hereinafter referred to as the Banks). The Company also has loan production offices in Houston,
Texas and Phoenix, Arizona.
The Company and Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions
providing financial products throughout the St. Louis, Houston and Phoenix metropolitan areas and
southwestern Florida. Additionally, the Company and Banks are subject to the regulations of
certain Federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and Banks conform to generally accepted
accounting principles within the banking industry. In compiling the consolidated financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in a short period of time include
the determination of the reserve for possible loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned and
stock options, and determination of possible impairment of intangible assets. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information
and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Certain amounts in the 2009 consolidated financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. Such reclassifications have
no effect on previously reported net loss or stockholders equity.
Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31,
2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Companys previously issued Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.
Principles of Consolidation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
Banks. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Basis of Accounting
The Company and Banks utilize the accrual basis of accounting, which includes in the total of net
income all revenues earned and expenses incurred, regardless of when actual cash payments are
received or paid. The Company is also required to report comprehensive income, of which net income
is a component. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances arising from
non-owner sources, including all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investments by, and distributions to, owners.
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include due from banks,
interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions (all of which are payable on demand), and
Federal funds sold. Certain balances are maintained in other financial institutions that
participate in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations (FDIC) Transaction Account Guarantee
Program. Under this program, these balances are fully guaranteed by the FDIC through December 31,
2013. After this period, these balances would generally exceed the level of deposits insured by
the FDIC.
8
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock Issuance Costs
The Company incurs certain costs associated with the issuance of its common stock. Such costs are
recorded as a reduction of equity capital.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events after the consolidated balance sheet date of March 31,
2010 through May 14, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued with the filing of this
Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution of earnings per share which could occur under the treasury stock method if contracts to
issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised. The following table presents a summary
of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(restated) 2010 |
2009 | |||||||
Basic |
||||||||
Net income
(loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (3,047,596 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
20,972,091 | 20,746,267 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.15 | ) | < 0.01 | ||||
Diluted |
||||||||
Net income
(loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (3,047,596 | ) | 90,874 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
20,972,091 | 20,746,267 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
| 72,573 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
20,972,091 | 20,818,840 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.15 | ) | < 0.01 | ||||
9
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Restatement
On March 4, 2011, the Company determined that it needed to restate its previously issued interim
condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
that these previously issued interim condensed consolidated financial statements should no longer
be relied upon, as a result of the identification of certain omitted disclosures from the Companys
interim condensed consolidated financial statements issued for those particular periods.
This restatement is required due to certain disclosure omissions in the previously issued interim
condensed consolidated financial statements related to net losses available to common shareholders
after increasing the net loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, which required an
adjustment of the previously reported net loss per share data included in the Companys interim
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
These restatements had no effect on the Companys consolidated net loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, or its consolidated stockholders equity as of March 31, 2010. Net loss available
to common shareholders, after increasing the loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company,
increased from the $(0.12) per share originally disclosed to $(0.15) per share as restated, for
both basic and fully-diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The effects of the restatement for additional disclosures and recalculation of per share
information regarding the Companys net loss available to common shareholders after payment of
preferred dividends, by financial statement line item on the interim condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
As reported | As restated | |||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 3,264,982 | 3,264,982 | 3,880,456 | ||||||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
1,087,020 | 1,087,020 | 1,125,932 | |||||||||
Other real estate expense |
1,373,787 | 1,373,787 | 309,663 | |||||||||
FDIC assessment |
784,518 | 784,518 | 503,533 | |||||||||
Data processing |
432,543 | 432,543 | 474,674 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,072 | 4,072 | 4,072 | |||||||||
Other interest expenses |
807,590 | 807,590 | 942,802 | |||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
7,754,512 | 7,754,512 | 7,241,132 | |||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(3,973,663 | ) | (3,973,663 | ) | 52,648 | |||||||
Applicable income tax benefit |
(1,474,958 | ) | (1,474,958 | ) | (38,226 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,498,705 | ) | (2,498,705 | ) | 90,874 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(548,891 | ) | | |||||||||
Net loss attributed to common shareholders |
(3,047,596 | ) | 90,874 | |||||||||
Per share amounts |
||||||||||||
Basic loss per share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | (0.15 | ) | <0.01 | ||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
$ | 20,972,091 | 20,972,091 | 20,746,267 | ||||||||
Diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | (0.15 | ) | <0.01 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
$ | 20,972,091 | 20,972,091 | 20,818,840 |
NOTE 2 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets include the core deposit premium relating to the Companys
acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey, which is being amortized into noninterest expense on a
straight-line basis over 15 years. Amortization of the core deposit intangible assets existing at
March 31, 2010 will be $4,072 per quarter until completely amortized.
The excess of the Companys consideration given in its acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey over the
fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill, an intangible asset on the
consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is the Companys only intangible asset with an indefinite
useful life, and the Company is required to test the intangible asset for impairment on an annual
basis. Impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of an intangible
asset with an indefinite life. No impairment writedown has thus far been required on this
intangible asset.
NOTE 3 STOCK OPTIONS
Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the Companys
consolidated financial statements over the period of service to which such compensation relates
(generally the vesting period), and are measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. The grant date values of share options are estimated using option-pricing
models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market
prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after
the grant date, incremental compensation cost would be recognized in an amount equal to
10
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
the excess
of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately
before the modification.
No value was ascribed to the options granted in the first quarter of 2009 as the option price
significantly exceeded the market value of the stock on the grant date; however, the Companys
common stock is not actively traded on any exchange. Accordingly, the availability of fair value
information for the Companys common stock is limited. In using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to value the options, several assumptions have been made in arriving at the estimated fair
value of the options granted, including minimal or no volatility in the Companys common stock
price, expected forfeitures of 10%, no dividends paid on the common stock, an expected weighted
average option life of six years, and a risk-free interest rate approximating the U.S. Treasury
rates for the applicable duration period. Any change in these assumptions could have a significant
impact on the effects of determining compensation costs.
Following is a summary of the Companys stock option activity for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Options Granted Under | Options Granted to Directors | |||||||||||||||
Incentive Stock Option Plans | Under Nonqualified Plans | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Option Price | Number | Option Price | Number | |||||||||||||
per Share | of Shares | per Share | of Shares | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 7.61 | 1,553,450 | $ | 7.98 | 673,000 | ||||||||||
Granted |
7.50 | 102,250 | 7.50 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
8.81 | (59,500 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 7.56 | 1,596,200 | $ | 7.98 | 673,500 | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 8.05 | 1,424,450 | $ | 8.41 | 666,816 | ||||||||||
Forfeited |
10.44 | (12,250 | ) | 11.88 | (5,816 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 8.03 | 1,412,200 | $ | 8.38 | 661,000 | ||||||||||
The weighted average option prices for the 2,073,200 and 2,269,700 options outstanding at
March 31, 2010 and 2009, were $8.14 and $7.68, respectively. At March 31, 2010, options to
purchase an additional 522,050 shares of Company common stock were available for future grants
under the various plans.
NOTE 4 DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Banks issue financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of the
business of meeting the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and may involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets. The contractual
amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Banks have in particular classes
of these financial instruments.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented
by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Banks use the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as they do for financial instruments included on the
balance sheets. Following is a summary of the Banks off-balance-sheet financial instruments at
March 31, 2010:
Financial instruments for which contractual amounts represent: |
||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 117,792,139 | ||
Standby letters of credit |
13,172,904 | |||
$ | 130,965,043 | |||
11
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Of the total
commitments to extend credit
at March 31, 2010, $22,089,331 were made at fixed rates of interest. Commitments generally have
fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since
certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Banks evaluate
each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if
deemed necessary by the Banks upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation
of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally residential or income-producing
commercial property or equipment, on which the Banks generally have a superior lien.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Banks to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party, for which draw requests have historically not been made
thereon. Such guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing
arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments at March 31, 2010:
Carrying | Estimated | Fair value | ||||||||
amount | fair value | measurements | ||||||||
Balance sheet assets: |
||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 54,975,403 | $ | 54,975,403 | Carrying value | |||||
Investment in debt securities |
238,712,309 | 238,712,309 | Level 2 and 3 inputs | |||||||
Loans, net |
1,071,891,987 | 1,081,954,920 | Level 3 inputs | |||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
5,290,542 | 5,290,542 | Carrying value | |||||||
$ | 1,370,870,241 | $ | 1,380,933,174 | |||||||
Balance sheet liabilities: |
||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 1,212,682,542 | $ | 1,223,712,780 | Level 3 inputs | |||||
Short-term borrowings |
19,776,971 | 19,776,971 | Carrying value | |||||||
Long-term Federal Home |
||||||||||
Loan Bank borrowings |
99,000,000 | 120,234,818 | Level 3 inputs | |||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,954,220 | 1,954,220 | Carrying value | |||||||
$ | 1,333,413,733 | $ | 1,365,678,789 | |||||||
The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair value disclosures. Fair value is
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the
Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these
approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the
inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or
generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Even if there has been a
significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability regardless of
the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same, i.e.,
fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market
conditions. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company
is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. Financial
assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the
following three categories:
| Level 1 Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities and federal agency mortgage-backed securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are |
12
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. | |||
| Level 2 Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 3 Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer, or value assigned to such assets or liabilities. |
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value:
Cash and Other Short-Term Instruments For cash and due from banks (including interest-earning
deposits in other financial institutions), Federal funds sold, accrued interest receivable
(payable), and short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value,
as such instruments are due on demand and/or reprice in a short time period.
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities Investments in available-for-sale debt
securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Companys available-for-sale debt
securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 and 3 valuations. For all debt securities
other than the other debt securities described below, the market valuation utilizes several sources
which include observable inputs rather than significant unobservable inputs and therefore, fall
into the Level 2 category.
Included in other debt securities are collateralized debt obligation securities that are backed by
trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, and insurance companies (TRUP CDOs). Given
conditions in the debt markets at March 31, 2010, and the absence of observable transactions in the
secondary and new issue markets for TRUP CDOs, the few observable transactions and market
quotations that are available are not reliable for the purpose of determining fair value at March
31, 2010, and an income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that maximizes the
use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs is more
representative of fair value than the market approach valuation techniques. Accordingly, the TRUP
CDOs have been classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because significant
adjustments are required to determine fair value at the measurement date, particularly regarding
estimated default probabilities based on the credit quality of the specific issuer institutions for
the TRUP CDOs. The TRUP CDOs are the only assets measured on a recurring basis using Level 3
inputs. Following is further information regarding such assets:
Balance, at fair value on December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,237,737 | ||
Increase in fair value |
27,328 | |||
Payments in kind |
4,572 | |||
Principal payments received |
(3,550 | ) | ||
Balance, at fair value on March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,266,087 | ||
Loans The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans
that are considered impaired. At March 31, 2010, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the
fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the underlying collateral is based upon an
observable market price or current appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these
assets in the nonrecurring Level 2 category. The total principal balance of impaired loans
measured at fair value at March 31, 2010 was $107,178,682.
Deposits The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and interest-bearing transaction
account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of
fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits
of similar remaining maturities.
Long-Term Borrowings Rates currently available to the Company with similar terms and remaining
maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing long-term debt.
13
Table of Contents
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit The fair value of commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter
into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements, the likelihood
of the counterparties drawing on such financial instruments, and the present creditworthiness of
such counterparties. The Company believes such commitments have been made on terms that are
competitive in the markets in which it operates.
14
Table of Contents
Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following presents managements discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial
condition and results of operations of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) as of and for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. This discussion and analysis is intended to
review the significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company, and provides a more comprehensive review which is not otherwise apparent from the
consolidated financial statements alone. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the
accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report and the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our most recent
annual report on Form 10-K/A.
The Company has prepared all of the consolidated financial information in this report in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). In preparing the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company makes estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. No assurances can be given that actual results
will not differ from those estimates.
Forward-Looking Statements
Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, some of the
information in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as
may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, potential, could, and similar words,
although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of
which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in our most
recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as updated from time to
time in our subsequent SEC filings. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this
report, unless otherwise required by applicable rules.
Overview
The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers
throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida
through the 23 locations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB
(hereinafter referred to as the Banks). The Company was incorporated and began its development
stage activities on July 24, 1998. Such development stage activities (i.e., applying for a banking
charter, raising capital, acquiring property, and developing policies and procedures, etc.) led to
the opening of Reliance Bank (as a new bank) upon receipt of all regulatory approvals on April 16,
1999. Since its opening in 1999 through March 31, 2010, Reliance Bank has added 20 branch locations
in the St. Louis metropolitan area of Missouri and Illinois and Loan Production Offices (LPOs) in
Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona and has grown its total assets, loans and deposits to $1.4
billion, $1.0 billion, and $1.1 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
Effective May 31, 2003, the Company purchased The Bank of Godfrey, a Godfrey, Illinois state
banking institution. The Godfrey bank was merged with and into Reliance Bank on October 31, 2005.
Reliance Bank also opened an LPO in Ft. Myers, Florida on July 1, 2004. Effective January 17, 2006,
the Company opened a new Federal Savings Bank, Reliance Bank, FSB, in Ft. Myers, Florida, and loans
totaling approximately $14 million that were originated by the Reliance Bank LPO were transferred
to Reliance Bank, FSB. Since its opening in 2006, Reliance Bank, FSB has added three branch
locations in southwestern Florida, and has grown its total assets, loans, and deposits to $99.3
million, $64.1 million, and $76.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, Reliance Banks total assets, total revenues, and net loss represented 93.35%,
93.94%, and 35.13%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated total assets, total revenue, and
net loss. Reliance Bank, FSBs total assets, total revenues, and net loss represented 6.68%,
6.07%, and 56.85%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated totals. The Company incurred a net
loss of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
During 2008, the Company completed building its St. Louis metropolitan branch network. The Company
plans to continue building its branch network in southwestern Florida at some time in the future,
with four additional branches planned; however, the building of these branches has been suspended
while management focuses on Reliance Bank, FSBs profitability in light of the
15
Table of Contents
stressful market conditions in southwestern Florida. The Companys branch expansion plans were
designed to increase the Companys market share in the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and
Illinois and southwestern Florida and to allow the Companys banking subsidiaries to compete with
much larger financial institutions in these markets. The Houston and Phoenix LPOs are intended to
benefit from commercial and residential lending and fee income generation opportunities in these
larger and historically higher-growth markets.
The St. Louis metropolitan, southwestern Florida, Houston and Phoenix markets in which the
Companys banking subsidiaries operate are highly competitive in the financial services area. The
Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing
financial products throughout these markets.
The Companys total consolidated assets were $1.5 billion at March 31, 2010, with loans and
deposits totaling $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. The branch locations of the Banks
have provided the Company with excellent strategic locations from which depositors and borrowers
can be accessed. Three Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2008, six Reliance Bank branches were
opened in 2006, one branch was opened in 2005, four branches were opened in 2004, two branches were
opened in 2003, and one branch was opened each year in 2002, 2001, and 1999. Three Reliance Bank,
FSB branches were opened in 2007 and one branch was opened in 2006, while one temporary branch was
closed in 2009 due to local economic conditions.
The Company has funded its Banks branch expansion with several private placement stock offerings
made to accredited investors since its inception. The Company has made a total of 12 such offerings
since its inception and has sold 20,972,091 shares of Company Common Stock through March 31, 2010.
The Companys consolidated net income (loss) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 totaled $(2,498,705) and $90,874, respectively. While the Companys net interest income has
grown, the provision for possible loan losses has increased, reflecting an increase in
nonperforming loans, which has resulted from a substantial decline in the real estate and local
economic markets in which the Companys banking subsidiaries operate. These factors and their
effect on the Companys results of operations are discussed in more detail below.
Net interest income before provision for possible loan losses for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $10,818,267 and $9,009,011, respectively. This growth in
year-to-date net interest income resulted from a decrease in the rates paid on deposits and a shift
in funding composition toward lower cost deposit products, reduced by increasing nonearning problem
assets.
Interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 totaled $6,789,927 and $10,975,234, respectively. The Company continues to restructure its
mix of deposits away from higher rate time deposits and short-term borrowings to lower cost savings
and money market accounts. Also, the Company has been able to lower rates on retail deposits and
still retain customer balances.
The substantial decline in the real estate market that has occurred over the past several years on
a national scale has also been experienced in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida
areas. Residential home building and sales have declined significantly from the levels enjoyed in
prior years. As a result, the Company has experienced a significant and continual increase in
nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned).
Nonperforming assets totaled $110.3 million at March 31, 2010 compared with $54.7 million at March
31, 2009. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans was 2.96%
at March 31, 2010 compared with 1.15% at March 31, 2009. Net charge-offs for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 totaled $7.2 million compared with $2.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The provision for possible loan losses charged to expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $7,692,000 and $2,250,000, respectively. The increase in the
provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2010 was a direct reaction to the significant and
continued decline of the real estate market. The Company believes it has identified existing
problems in the portfolio and worked to address those issues; however, the economy continues to
present challenges to our borrowers and it could be likely that others will experience difficulties
in meeting obligations. See further discussion regarding the Companys management of credit risk
in the section below entitled Risk Management.
Total noninterest income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $654,582 and
$534,769, respectively. A portion of the increase is attributed to a net gain of $64,691 from
investment securities sold during the first quarter of 2010. No investment security sales occurred
during the first quarter of 2009. Income generated from other real estate properties for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $80,860 and $14,101, respectively.
Offsetting this gain was a decline in secondary mortgage fees for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, which were $43,173 and $110,642,
16
Table of Contents
respectively. Deposit service charge income increased by $16,838, or 8.11%, to $224,476 for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $207,638 for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
due to a larger transaction deposit base.
Total noninterest expense was $7,754,512 and $7,241,132 for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Increased expenses relating to other real estate owned (including losses on
sales of foreclosed property and writedowns on properties still held, as well as holding costs on
such properties), and increased FDIC insurance assessments more than offset the cost savings
achieved in other operational expenses such as personnel and occupancy expenses.
The Companys effective tax rate for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was
(37.12%) and (72.61%), respectively. The change in effective tax rates during these periods is a
result of the level of tax-exempt interest income and its effect on the pre-tax income/loss.
Basic and
fully-diluted loss per common share for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 were both
$(0.15) (restated) per share. Basic and fully-diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 were both less than $0.01 per share.
Following are certain of the Companys ratios generally followed in the banking industry for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
As of and for the | ||||||||
Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Percentage of net income to: |
||||||||
Average total assets |
(0.67 | %) | 0.02 | % | ||||
Average stockholders equity |
(6.73 | %) | 0.23 | % | ||||
Percentage of common dividends declared to net income per common share |
| | ||||||
Percentage of average stockholders equity to average total assets |
9.97 | % | 9.98 | % |
Critical Accounting Policies
The impact and any associated risks related to the Companys critical accounting policies on
business operations are discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial
results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see
the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for year ended December 31, 2009 and the
related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our annual report in Form 10-K, which was filed March 26, 2010. Management believes
there have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the first quarter of
2010.
Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net Interest Income
The Companys net interest income increased $1,809,256 (20.08%) to $10,818,267 for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 from the $9,009,011 earned during the three-month period ended March
31, 2009. The Companys net interest margin for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 was 3.13% and 2.41%, respectively. This increase in margin percentage is primarily attributed
to lower cost of funds on the Companys retail deposit products and a shift in funding composition
toward lower cost deposit products.
Average interest earning assets for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $117,910,809 (7.67%) to
$1,418,667,963 from the level of $1,536,578,772 for the first quarter of 2009. The decline was
primarily due to a decrease in loan balances. Total average loans for the first quarter of 2010
decreased $119,744,586 (9.62%) to $1,125,419,848 from the level of $1,245,164,434 for the first
quarter of 2009. The depressed economy has reduced the Companys opportunities for loan growth in
its current markets.
Total average investment securities for the first quarter of 2010 increased $4,810,972 (1.88%) to
$260,488,350 from the level of $255,677,378 for the first quarter of 2009. The Company uses its
investment portfolio to (a) provide support for borrowing arrangements for securities sold under
repurchase agreements, (b) provide support for pledging purposes for deposits of governmental and
municipal deposits over FDIC insurance limits, (c) provide a secondary source of liquidity through
laddered maturities of such securities and their marketability, and (d) provide increased
interest income over that which would be earned on
17
Table of Contents
overnight/daily fund investments. The total carrying value of securities pledged to secure public
funds and repurchase agreements was approximately $169.1 million at March 31, 2010. The Banks have
also pledged letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Banks totaling $1,690,974 as additional
collateral to secure public funds at March 31, 2010.
Average short-term investments can fluctuate significantly from day to day based on a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, the collected balances of customer deposits, loan demand
and investment security maturities. Excess funds not invested in loans or investment securities
are invested in overnight funds with various unaffiliated financial institutions. The average
balances of such short-term investments for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were
$32,759,765 and $35,736,960, respectively.
A key factor in attempting to increase the Companys net interest margin is to maintain a higher
percentage of earning assets in the loan category, which is the Companys highest earning asset
category. However, average loans as a percentage of average earning assets were 79.33% for the
first quarter of 2010, which was a 170 basis point decrease over the 81.03% achieved in the first
quarter of 2009. This decline resulted from the depressed economic environment in the Banks
market areas, resulting in fewer lending opportunities for the Banks.
Total average interest-bearing deposits for the first quarter of 2010 were $1,173,098,490, a
decrease of $33,932,419 (2.81%) from the level of $1,207,030,909 for the first quarter of 2009.
The Company has sought to lower its percentage of higher cost time deposit balances while
increasing lower cost savings and interest bearing transaction account balances. Total average
time deposits decreased $242,651,407 (28.02%) to $623,381,028 from a level of $866,032,435 for the
first quarter of 2009. The Company increased average savings account deposits by $137,524,647
(76.01%) to $318,459,696 from $180,935,049 for the first quarter of 2009. Also, interest bearing
transaction accounts increased $71,194,341 (44.48%) to $231,257,766 from a level of $160,063,425
for the first quarter of 2009.
The Companys short-term borrowings consist of overnight funds borrowed from unaffiliated financial
institutions and securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements with larger deposit customers.
Average short term borrowings declined $25,758,765 (65.14%) to $13,783,129 from $39,541,894 at
March 31, 2009. Short-term borrowings can fluctuate significantly based on short-term liquidity
needs and growth in deposits.
The Company also uses longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a less expensive
alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market, particularly when such longer-term fixed
rate advances can be matched with longer-term fixed rate assets. The average balance of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances declined $32,537,634 (23.92%) to $103,462,366 for the first quarter of
2010, compared with the $136,000,000 average balance for the first quarter of 2009. The decline is
the result of the Companys efforts to increase core retail deposits and reduce its percentage of
wholesale funding.
The overall mix of the Companys funding sources has a significant impact on the Companys net
interest margin. Following is a summary of the percentage of the various components of average
interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all average
interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits (hereinafter described as total
funding sources) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Average deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
4.71 | % | 4.02 | % | ||||
Interest-bearing: |
||||||||
Transaction accounts |
17.08 | 11.11 | ||||||
Savings |
23.52 | 12.56 | ||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
20.01 | 25.21 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
26.02 | 34.91 | ||||||
Total average interest-bearing deposits |
86.63 | 83.79 | ||||||
Total average deposits |
91.34 | 87.81 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1.02 | 2.75 | ||||||
Longer-term advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
7.64 | 9.44 | ||||||
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||
18
Table of Contents
The composition of the Companys deposit portfolio will fluctuate as recently added branches
help to diversify the Companys deposit base. The overall level of interest rates will also cause
fluctuations between categories. The Company has sought to increase the percentage of its
noninterest-bearing deposits to total funding sources and increase its percentage of lower cost
savings and interest bearing transaction accounts. Through deposit campaigns, the Company
increased its percentage of average savings accounts to 23.52% of total average funding sources,
compared to 12.56% at March 31, 2009. Also, average interest bearing transaction accounts
increased to 17.08% of total average funding sources from 11.11% at March 31, 2009. These
increases allowed the Company to reduce the percentage of short term borrowings and longer term
advances. Higher cost certificates of deposits declined as well, but continue to be the Companys
most significant funding source, which comprised 46.03% of total average funding sources during the
first three months of 2010, as compared with 60.12% during the first three months of 2009.
Certificates of deposit have a lagging effect with interest rate changes, as most certificates of
deposit have longer maturities at fixed rates.
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the period indicated, a
summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and
changes in yield/rates:
Amount of Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||
Change from 2010 to 2009 Due to | ||||||||||||
Yield/ | ||||||||||||
Volume (1) | Rate (2) | Total | ||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | (1,652,324 | ) | (566,757 | ) | (2,219,081 | ) | |||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
69,444 | (192,079 | ) | (122,635 | ) | |||||||
Exempt from Federal income taxes |
(48,501 | ) | 18,885 | (29,616 | ) | |||||||
Short-term investments |
(1,330 | ) | 922 | (408 | ) | |||||||
Total interest income |
(1,632,711 | ) | (739,029 | ) | (2,371,740 | ) | ||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||
Interest bearing transaction accounts |
211,400 | (261,029 | ) | (49,629 | ) | |||||||
Savings accounts |
663,810 | (915,591 | ) | (251,781 | ) | |||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
(669,308 | ) | (717,097 | ) | (1,386,405 | ) | ||||||
Other time deposits |
(1,207,784 | ) | (796,788 | ) | (2,004,572 | ) | ||||||
Total deposits |
(1,001,882 | ) | (2,690,505 | ) | (3,692,387 | ) | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
(113,930 | ) | (115,939 | ) | (229,869 | ) | ||||||
Long-term borrowings |
(305,072 | ) | 42,021 | (263,051 | ) | |||||||
Total interest expense |
(1,420,884 | ) | (2,764,423 | ) | (4,185,307 | ) | ||||||
Net interest income |
$ | (211,827 | ) | 2,025,394 | 1,813,567 | |||||||
(1) | Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior year. | |
(2) | Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior year. |
NOTE: The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate
changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
Provision for Possible Loan Losses
The provision for possible loan losses charged to earnings for the three-month periods ended March
31, 2010 and 2009 was $7,692,000 and $2,250,000, respectively. Net charge-offs for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $7,196,485 and $2,359,775, respectively. At March
31, 2010 and 2009, the reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans
was 2.96% and 1.15%, respectively. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of
nonperforming loans (comprised of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and
loans still accruing interest that were 90 days delinquent) was 42.55% and 36.24% at March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The continued significant decline in the real estate market has resulted
in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and a higher provision for loan losses in the
first quarter of 2010. See further discussion regarding the Companys credit risk management in
the section below entitled Risk Management.
19
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income for the first quarter of 2010, excluding security sale gains and losses,
increased $55,122 (10.31%) to $589,891, from the $534,769 earned for the first quarter of 2009.
Rental income generated from other real estate properties increased $66,759 (473.43%) to $80,860
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 from $14,101 for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Offsetting this gain was a decline in secondary mortgage fees of $67,469 (60.98%) to $43,173
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 from $110,642 for the three months ended March 31,
2009, resulting from less mortgage refinance activity. Deposit service charge income increased by
$16,838 (8.11%) to $224,476 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $207,638 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, due to a larger transaction deposit base.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $513,380 (7.09%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $7,754,512 from the
$7,241,132 during the first quarter of 2009. Increased expenses relating to other real estate
owned (including losses on sales of foreclosed property and writedowns on properties still held, as
well as holding costs on such properties), and increased FDIC insurance assessments more than
offset the cost savings achieved in other operational expenses such as personnel and occupancy
expenses.
Other real estate expense increased to $1,373,787, which was an increase of $1,064,124 (343.64%)
over the $309,663 incurred during the first quarter of 2009. The increase is due to higher levels
of foreclosed assets and the continued decline in real estate values. Net losses and writedowns
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 were $774,301.
FDIC assessment expense increased $280,985 (55.80%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $784,518 from
the $503,533 incurred during the first quarter of 2009, due to increased assessment rates on
deposits.
Total personnel costs decreased $615,474 (15.86%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $3,264,982 from
the $3,880,456 of personnel costs incurred for the first quarter of 2009. At the end of the first
quarter of 2009, the Company implemented a plan to reduce operating costs, which included a
reduction in staffing levels, and a reduction in certain benefits.
Total occupancy and equipment expenses decreased $38,912 (3.46%) to $1,087,020 for the first
quarter of 2010 from the $1,125,932 incurred in the first quarter of 2009, as certain assets became
fully depreciated and a temporary facility was closed.
Total data processing expenses for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $42,131 (8.88%) to $432,543
for the first quarter of 2010, as compared with the $474,674 of expenses incurred for the first
quarter of 2009, due to cost reduction efforts.
Income Taxes
Applicable income tax benefits totaled $1,474,958 and $38,226 for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 were (37.12%) and (72.61%), respectively. The change in effective tax
rates during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is a result of the level of
tax-exempt interest income and its effect on the pre-tax income/loss.
Financial Condition
Total assets of the Company declined $51,692,713 (3.36%) in the first three months of 2010 to
$1,485,014,871 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,536,707,584 at December 31, 2009. The
depressed economy has reduced the Companys opportunities for loan growth in its current markets.
Total deposits of the Company declined $53,377,655 (4.22%) in the first three months of 2010 to
$1,212,682,542 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,266,060,197 at December 31, 2009. The
Company has sought to lower its percentage of higher cost time deposit balances while increasing
lower cost savings and interest bearing transaction account balances. The overall decline is
consistent with the decline in total assets.
20
Table of Contents
Short-term borrowings at March 31, 2010 increased $7,080,039 (55.76%) to $19,776,971 from the level
of $12,696,932 at December 31, 2009. Short-term borrowings will fluctuate significantly based on
short-term liquidity needs and certain seasonal deposit trends. Longer-term borrowings declined
$5,000,000 (4.81%) in the first three months of 2010 to $99,000,000 at March 31, 2010, form a level
of $104,000,000. These longer-term fixed rate advances were used as an alternative funding source
and are matched with longer-term fixed rate assets.
Total loans decreased $36,228,240 (3.18%) in the first three months of 2010 to $1,104,653,035 at
March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,140,881,275 at December 31, 2009. The depressed economy has
reduced the Companys opportunities for loan growth in its current markets.
Investment securities, all of which are maintained as available-for-sale, decreased $45,407,247
(15.98%) in the first three months of 2010 to $238,712,309 at March 31, 2010, from the level of
$284,119,556 at December 31, 2009. The Companys investment portfolio growth is dependent upon the
level of deposit growth and the funding requirements of the Companys loan portfolio, as described
above.
Total capital decreased $1,445,797 (0.97%) to $148,223,627 at March 31, 2010 from the level of
$149,669,424 at December 31, 2009. The Companys capital-to-asset percentage was 9.98% at March
31, 2010.
Recent Developments
The Company and the Banks have recently entered into a certain Agreement and memoranda of
understanding (MOU) with regulatory authorities as listed below and discussed in our most recent
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010. The Agreement and MOUs are informal administrative
agreements pursuant to which the Company and the Banks have agreed to take various actions and
comply with certain requirements to facilitate improvement in financial condition.
On November 30, 2009, Reliance Banks Board of Directors entered into an Agreement with the
Missouri Division of Finance and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to, among other
things, (a) develop a plan to reduce the level of risk in each criticized asset aggregating
$2,000,000 or more included in the September 21, 2009 Missouri Division of Finance examination
report; (b) maintain the reserve for possible loan losses at a level which is reasonable in
relation to the degree of risk inherent in the Banks loan portfolio; (c) develop and adopt
policies and procedures designed to identify and monitor concentrations of credit, including
out-of-territory loans and loan participations purchased; (d) formulate plans to reduce the Banks
concentrations of credit, particularly in commercial real estate and land acquisition and
development lending; (e) review and revise the Banks formal loan policy to address weaknesses
noted in the September 21, 2009 Missouri Division of Finance examination report; (f) cease making
or extending any loans which might violate the Banks written loan policy, except in those
instances in which the Board of Directors has made a prior determination that a variance from loan
policy is in the best interests of the Bank, with such Board decisions appropriately documented in
the minutes of the Board of Director meetings; (g) develop a formal written profit plan, which will
provide a three-year budget projection for asset growth and dividend payouts to ensure Tier 1
leverage capital is maintained at least a 7% level; and (h) maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital
ratio of at least 7%, and other capital ratios such that the Bank will remain well-capitalized, and
not pay any dividends, management fees or bonuses, or increase any executive salary or other
compensation that would reduce the Bank to a level below a well-capitalized status.
On February 10, 2010, Reliance Bank, FSBs Board of Directors entered into a MOU with the Office of
Thrift Supervision OTS to, among other things, (a) develop a business plan for the years ending
December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012 which shall include (1) strategies to preserve and enhance the
Banks capital sufficient to meet its needs and support its risk profile; (2) achieve core
profitability by the end of 2010; and (3) establish and maintain Board-approved loan concentration
limits expressed as a percentage of risk-based capital that takes into account the Banks current
capital position, local and regional market conditions, and the credit risks posed by higher risk
loans; (b) continue to take steps to identify, classify, and properly account for problem assets,
including but not limited to: (1) conducting periodic asset quality reviews to identify and assign
appropriate classifications to all problem assets; (2) performing analyses on all impaired assets
identified by the review required by subparagraph (b)(1) above; and (3) estimating potential losses
in identified problem assets, while establishing an appropriate reserve for loan losses for all
classified assets; (c) develop a detailed, written plan with specific strategies, targets, and
timeframes to reduce the Banks level of criticized assets; (d) review the adequacy of the Banks
reserve for loan losses policies, procedures and methodologies on at least an annual basis to
ensure the timely establishment and maintenance of an adequate reserve for loan losses account
balance; (e) identify and monitor all loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings, with
delinquent loans that are modified being classified as substandard and placed on nonaccrual status
for at least six months; (f) prohibit the increase in the dollar amount of brokered deposits; (g)
analyze the major differences in and bases for significant differences in the value of assets,
liabilities, and
21
Table of Contents
off-balance-sheet positions calculated by the OTS Net Portfolio Value and the Banks internal
economic value of equity model; and (h) correct all deficiencies and weaknesses identified in the
October 5, 2009 OTS report of examination.
On March 16, 2010, the Company entered into a MOU with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Federal Reserve) requiring the Company to, among other things, (a) utilize its financial and
managerial resources to assist the Banks in addressing weaknesses identified during their most
recent regulatory examinations, and achieving/maintaining compliance with any supervisory action
between the Banks and their primary regulators; (b) declare no corporate dividends without the
prior written approval of the Federal Reserve; (c) incur no additional debt without the prior
written approval of the Federal Reserve; and (d) make no distributions of interest or other sums on
its preferred stock without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve.
The Agreement and MOUs will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the applicable
regulatory authority. We do not expect the actions called for by the Agreement and MOUs to change
our business strategy in any material respect, although they may have the effect of limiting or
delaying our ability or plans to expand. Management has taken various actions to comply with the
Agreement and MOUs and will diligently endeavor to take all actions necessary for compliance.
Management believes that the Company and the Banks are currently in compliance with the Agreement
and MOUs, although formal determination of compliance with the Agreement and MOUs can only be made
by the applicable regulatory authority.
22
Table of Contents
The following tables show the condensed average balance sheets for the periods reported and the
percentage of each principal category of assets, liabilities and stockholders equity to total
assets. Also shown is the average yield on each category of interest-earning assets and the average
rate paid on each category of interest-bearing liabilities for each of the periods reported.
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Percent | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||
Average | of Total | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||
Balance | Assets | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
$ | 1,125,419,848 | 74.53 | % | $ | 15,458,032 | 5.57 | % | ||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
230,871,686 | 15.29 | % | 1,833,350 | 3.22 | % | ||||||||||
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
29,616,664 | 1.96 | % | 435,462 | 5.96 | % | ||||||||||
Short-term investments |
32,759,765 | 2.17 | % | 16,555 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
Total earning assets |
1,418,667,963 | 93.95 | % | 17,743,399 | 5.07 | % | ||||||||||
Nonearning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
4,923,591 | 0.33 | % | |||||||||||||
Reserve for possible loan losses |
(32,373,486 | ) | (2.14 | )% | ||||||||||||
Premises and equipment |
42,020,773 | 2.78 | % | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
75,688,483 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
1,132,714 | 0.08 | % | |||||||||||||
Total nonearning assets |
91,392,075 | 6.05 | % | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,510,060,038 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 231,257,766 | 15.31 | % | 545,609 | 0.96 | % | |||||||||
Savings |
318,459,696 | 21.09 | % | 1,024,281 | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
270,925,947 | 17.94 | % | 1,640,112 | 2.46 | % | ||||||||||
Other time deposits |
352,455,081 | 23.34 | % | 2,580,587 | 2.97 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,173,098,490 | 77.68 | % | 5,790,589 | 2.00 | % | ||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
103,462,366 | 6.85 | % | 968,919 | 3.80 | % | ||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
13,783,129 | 0.91 | % | 30,419 | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,290,343,985 | 85.44 | % | 6,789,927 | 2.13 | % | ||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
63,826,553 | 4.23 | % | |||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
5,268,643 | 0.36 | % | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,359,439,181 | 90.03 | % | |||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
150,620,857 | 9.97 | % | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,510,060,038 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 10,953,472 | ||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
3.13 | % | ||||||||||||||
(continued)
23
Table of Contents
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Percent | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||
Average | of Total | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||
Balance | Assets | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
$ | 1,245,164,434 | 77.45 | % | $ | 17,677,113 | 5.76 | % | ||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
222,727,051 | 13.85 | % | 1,955,985 | 3.56 | % | ||||||||||
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
32,950,327 | 2.05 | % | 465,078 | 5.72 | % | ||||||||||
Short-term investments |
35,736,960 | 2.22 | % | 16,963 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
Total earning assets |
1,536,578,772 | 95.57 | % | 20,115,139 | 5.31 | % | ||||||||||
Nonearning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
5,117,201 | 0.32 | % | |||||||||||||
Reserve for possible loan losses |
(14,929,468 | ) | (0.93 | )% | ||||||||||||
Premises and equipment |
44,025,461 | 2.74 | % | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
37,297,792 | 2.32 | % | |||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
(396,148 | ) | (0.02 | )% | ||||||||||||
Total nonearning assets |
71,114,838 | 4.43 | % | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,607,693,610 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 160,063,425 | 9.96 | % | 595,238 | 1.51 | % | |||||||||
Savings |
180,935,049 | 11.25 | % | 1,276,062 | 2.86 | % | ||||||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
363,195,741 | 22.59 | % | 3,026,517 | 3.38 | % | ||||||||||
Other time deposits |
502,836,694 | 31.28 | % | 4,585,159 | 3.70 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,207,030,909 | 75.08 | % | 9,482,976 | 3.19 | % | ||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
136,000,000 | 8.46 | % | 1,231,970 | 3.67 | % | ||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
39,541,894 | 2.46 | % | 260,288 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,382,572,803 | 86.00 | % | 10,975,234 | 3.22 | % | ||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
57,886,059 | 3.60 | % | |||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
6,719,860 | 0.42 | % | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,447,178,722 | 90.02 | % | |||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
160,514,888 | 9.98 | % | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,607,693,610 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 9,139,905 | ||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
2.41 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Interest includes loan fees, recorded as discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our annual report on Form 10-K, which was filed March 26, 2010. | |
(2) | Average balances include nonaccrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest, but is recognized only upon receipt. | |
(3) | Interest yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Nontaxable income has been adjusted upward by the amount of Federal income tax that would have been paid if the income had been taxed at a rate of 34%, adjusted downward by the disallowance of the interest cost to carry nontaxable loans and securities. |
Risk Management
Managements objective in structuring the balance sheet is to maximize the return on average assets
while minimizing the associated risks. The major risks concerning the Company are credit, liquidity
and interest rate risks. The following is a discussion concerning the Companys management of these
risks.
24
Table of Contents
Credit Risk Management
Managing risks that the Companys banking subsidiaries assume in providing credit products to
customers is extremely important. Credit risk management includes defining an acceptable level of
risk and return, establishing appropriate policies and procedures to govern the credit process and
maintaining a thorough portfolio review process.
Of equal importance in the credit risk management process are the ongoing monitoring procedures
performed as part of the Companys loan review process. Credit policies are examined and procedures
reviewed for compliance each year. Loan personnel also continually monitor loans after disbursement
in an attempt to recognize any deterioration which may occur so that appropriate corrective action
can be initiated on a timely basis.
Net charge-offs for the first three months of 2010 were $7,196,485, compared to $2,359,775 for the
first three months of 2009. The increased charge-off levels result from the increased levels of
nonperforming loans and the decline in the overall valuation of real estate securing such loans.
The Companys banking subsidiaries had no loans to any foreign countries at March 31, 2010 and
2009, nor did they have any concentration of loans to any industry on these dates, although a
significant portion of the Companys loan portfolio is secured by commercial and residential real
estate in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. The Company has also refrained
from financing speculative transactions such as highly leveraged corporate buyouts, or
thinly-capitalized speculative start-up companies.
In the normal course of business, the Companys practice is to consider and act upon borrowers
requests for renewal of loans at their maturity. Evaluation of such requests includes a review of
the borrowers credit history, the collateral securing the loan, and the purpose of such requests.
In general, loans which the Banks renew at maturity may require payment of accrued interest, a
reduction in the loan balance, and/or the pledging of additional collateral and a potential
adjustment of the interest rate to reflect changes in economic conditions.
The continued significant decline of the real estate markets in the St. Louis metropolitan and
southwestern Florida areas has caused an increase in the Companys nonperforming assets. At March
31, 2010 and 2009, nonperforming loans totaled $76,896,651 and $39,168,715 respectively, comprised
of nonaccrual loans of $65,837,410 and $37,228,499, respectively, and loans 90 days delinquent and
still accruing interest of $1,998,599 and $1,940,216, respectively, and restructured loans totaling
$9,060,642 at March 31, 2010. The increase in non-performing loans is due to the continued
weakness in the economy, particularly regarding commercial and construction real estate in the
Banks markets. The Company has recently taken a more aggressive approach toward collection and
resolution of such problem credits. Such loans are continually reviewed for impairment as the
underlying real estate values have declined, resulting in additional loan charge-offs. Once
foreclosure occurs, additional declines in the value of the properties result in other real estate
owned write-downs. The Company believes the reserve for loan losses calculation at March 31, 2010
adequately considers the current fair value of the underlying collateral on its problem loan
portfolio; however, the values of these properties have continued to deteriorate, requiring the
additional provision for loan losses. Additional provisions and other real estate write-downs may
be required in subsequent quarters if the values of such properties continue to decline.
25
Table of Contents
Of the Companys $1.1 billion of loans outstanding at March 31, 2010, 6.8% were originated in
Florida and 93.2% outside of Florida. However, loans originated outside of Florida continue to
account for a smaller portion of the nonperforming loans and assets of the Company compared to
those loans originated in Florida, as the following table illustrates:
Originated In | ||||||||||||
Florida | All other | Total | ||||||||||
Net Charge-offs (quarter ended 3/31/2010) |
$ | 2.1 million | $ | 5.1 million | $ | 7.2 million | ||||||
Net Charge-offs (quarter ended 3/31/2009) |
$ | 2.0 million | $ | 0.4 million | $ | 2.4 million | ||||||
Nonperforming Loans (3/31/2010) |
$ | 26.9 million | $ | 50.0 million | $ | 76.9 million | ||||||
Nonperforming Loans (12/31/2009) |
$ | 25.4 million | $ | 46.7 million | $ | 72.1 million | ||||||
Nonperforming Loans (3/31/2009) |
$ | 31.4 million | $ | 7.8 million | $ | 39.2 million | ||||||
Nonperforming Assets* (3/31/2010) |
$ | 46.5 million | $ | 63.8 million | $ | 110.3million | ||||||
Nonperforming Assets* (12/31/2009) |
$ | 44.5 million | $ | 56.7 million | $ | 101.2million | ||||||
Nonperforming Assets* (3/31/2009) |
$ | 39.3 million | $ | 15.4 million | $ | 54.7 million | ||||||
Outstanding Loans Originated In |
||||||||||||
Respective Markets (3/31/10) |
$ | 75.2 million | $ | 1.030 billion | $ | 1.105 billion | ||||||
Outstanding Loans Originated In |
||||||||||||
Respective Markets (3/31/09) |
$ | 120.0 million | $ | 1.115 billion | $ | 1.235 billion |
* | Included in nonperforming assets are nonperforming loans and other real estate owned |
Nonperforming loans are defined as loans on nonaccrual status, loans 90 days or more past due but
still accruing, and restructured loans. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when contractually
past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loans are well secured
and in process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or
circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is
managements practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately, rather than delaying
such action until the loans become 90 days past due. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on
such loans is reversed and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are
subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal balance of the
loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied
to loan principal for financial reporting purposes.
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are also included in nonperforming
loans. Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are classified as such when the
underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value is sufficient to cover principal and
accrued interest) and are in the process of collection. Also included in nonperforming loans are
restructured loans. Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower
involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest
rate.
The continued significant decline of the real estate markets in the St. Louis metropolitan and
southwestern Florida areas has caused a significant increase in the Companys nonperforming loans
in 2009 and 2010. At March 31, 2010, nonperforming loans had increased $4,819,217 to $76,896,651,
from $72,077,434 at December 31, 2009, the largest components of which were primarily comprised of
the following loan relationships:
| A loan for approximately $1.4 million to an individual Florida investor that is in default and in the process of foreclosure prior to being suspended by a forbearance agreement. The loan is secured by an undeveloped real estate parcel in southwestern Florida. | ||
| A loan for approximately $1.5 million to a single purpose entity controlled by a group of investors that is in default. The loan is secured by a building and improved commercial lots in Florida. The Company is negotiating with the borrower and guarantors to develop a plan for the property. Recent interest has been expressed by several potential lessees of the building. | ||
| A loan for approximately $2.2 million to an individual, secured by the individuals primary residence in Florida, that is in default. The borrower entered into a forbearance agreement but has now defaulted under that negotiated plan. Foreclosure proceedings have been initiated again. |
26
Table of Contents
| A loan for approximately $1.4 million to a single purpose entity, secured by six improved commercial lots in Florida. The Company continues to negotiate with the borrower and guarantor to develop a marketing plan for the lots. | ||
| A loan for approximately $2.0 million to a single purpose entity secured by unimproved property in Florida that is in default. The Company has been negotiating with the borrower and guarantor to determine the best course of action. | ||
| Loans totaling approximately $2.0 million to entities controlled by a Florida real estate investor that were in default and for which foreclosure proceedings have commenced. Foreclosure is now moving forward uncontested based on an agreement reached among the Bank, borrowers and guarantors. These loans are secured by commercial real estate properties in southwestern Florida. | ||
| A loan for approximately $1.4 million to an individual investor for future residential and commercial development. Development has not been started as planned. The loan is secured by approximately 240 acres of ground in Florida currently in agricultural production. The Company is in the process of foreclosure. Concurrent with the foreclosure, the Company has negotiated a sale of the note and mortgage to the junior lien holder. | ||
| A loan for approximately $2.2 million to two Florida investors for future commercial development. Development has not started, as recent changes in FEMA flood maps have impacted the value and future development options. The borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement as it works through its options for the property, which now include action against Lee County, Florida for damages. | ||
| A loan for approximately $1.4 million to a single purpose entity for commercial development, which has been delayed. The loan is secured by 3.4 acres of ground in Florida. The Company, borrower, and guarantors continue to negotiate a resolution to the delay in development. | ||
| A loan for approximately $2.9 million for ground development of a proposed commercial retail strip center and self-storage facility in southwestern Florida. The entity was established by an experienced real estate developer; however, with the deterioration of the real estate market, the project did not begin construction, and the real estate downturn has affected the cash flow of the guarantor. The Company is working on obtaining a signed deed for the property in lieu of foreclosure. | ||
| A loan for approximately $13.2 million to acquire a manufacturing/distribution center and to provide funding for a future addition to the facility. Due to the low current occupancy, the Company is in discussion with the borrower to determine the best plan of action. | ||
| A loan for approximately $1.3 million to a corporation for the development of a commercial real estate parcel. The loan is secured by 6.2 acres of ground in Florida. The borrower and guarantor are negotiating with the Company and two other financial institutions to resolve all claims. | ||
| A $4.5 million loan to a single purpose entity. The operation is a retail commercial center in St Charles, Missouri. Exterior construction of the building is complete; interior configuration continues and is dictated by tenant needs. The borrower continues to work to find new tenants to fill up unleased space. The borrower is currently working on getting three new potential tenants to move in. Also, the Company and borrower are working on collecting past due rents from a select few tenants. | ||
| A loan for approximately $1.2 million to a Texas limited partnership. The loan is secured by a newly constructed retail commercial property in Dallas, Texas. The borrower has entered into bankruptcy protection. The Company is seeking a dismissal of the case in court so that it can foreclose on the property. Court hearings have occurred and will continue through the second quarter of 2010. The Company is still working through the legal issues with the bankruptcy and is waiting on the courts decision. |
27
Table of Contents
| A loan participation totaling approximately $2.5 million to entities controlled by a group of Missouri real estate investors for the purchase and development of a parcel of land in St. Charles, Missouri. The majority of the proposed entitlements and development have been completed. The loans are secured by the property. The lead bank reached an agreement with the borrower to move the project forward with a new home builder. The new builder has a good reputation and is qualified for the project, and has already completed five inventory homes. The Company and the builder are developing a marketing plan to increase sales prospects. | ||
| A $17.2 million loan to a commercial real estate developer in Houston, Texas. The loan is secured by three office buildings and developed commercial land. The borrower recently refinanced a tract of land that provided a principal loan reduction, payment of past due interest and real estate taxes. Additionally, the borrower has another tract of ground that is bank collateral under contract to a national home builder. Home building and sales are expected to be positive for the overall development. | ||
| A loan for approximately $4.0 million to a non-profit organization for the purchase of 482 acres and a 7,000 square foot residence in St. Louis, Missouri. The property is well located in a natural setting that abuts a river. The nonprofit organization has experienced financial setbacks, most notably a decline in contributions. Additional fund raising has started from friends of conservation for the purchase of the collateral. | ||
| A loan of approximately $1.1 million, the proceeds of which were used for the purchase of a commercial real estate property that is located in Fairview Heights, Illinois. The building is occupied by a credit union under a long-term lease. The Company financed the purchase and improvements of the building. |
The Company also has nonperforming assets in the form of other real estate owned. The Banks
maintained other real estate owned totaling $33,451,884, $29,085,943 and $15,489,980 at March 31,
2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Other real estate owned represents
property acquired through foreclosure, or deeded to the Banks in lieu of foreclosure for loans on
which borrowers have defaulted on payment of principal and interest. The following table details
the activity within other real estate owned since December 31, 2009:
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 29,085,943 | ||
Foreclosures |
5,757,441 | |||
Cash proceeds from sales |
(617,199 | ) | ||
Losses and writedowns |
(774,301 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 33,451,884 | ||
During this period of a declining real estate market, the Company has sought to add loans to
its portfolio with increased collateral margins or excess payment capacity from proven borrowers to
maintain the quality of the loan portfolio, and has often had to offer a competitively lower
interest rate on such loans. Given the collateral values maintained on its loan portfolio,
including the nonperforming loans discussed above, the Company believes the reserve for possible
loan losses is adequate to absorb losses in the portfolio existing at March 31, 2010; however,
should the real estate market continue to decline, the Company may require additional provisions to
the reserve for possible loan losses to address the declining collateral values.
Potential Problem Loans
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had 30 loans with a total principal balance of $50,293,602 that
were identified by management as having possible credit problems that raise doubts as to the
ability of the borrower to comply with the current repayment terms. These loans were continuing to
accrue interest and were less than 90 days past due on any scheduled payments. However, various
concerns, including, but not limited to, payment history, loan agreement compliance, adequacy of
collateral coverage, and borrowers overall financial condition caused management to believe that
these loans may result in reclassification at some future time as nonaccrual, past due or
restructured. Such loans are not necessarily indicative of future nonaccrual loans, as the Company
continues to work on resolving issues with both nonperforming and potential problem credits on its
watch list.
The Companys credit management policies and procedures focus on identifying, measuring, and
controlling credit exposure. These procedures employ a lender-initiated system of rating credits,
which is ratified in the loan approval process and subsequently tested in internal loan review and
regulatory bank examinations. The system requires rating all loans at the time they are made, at
each renewal date and as conditions warrant.
28
Table of Contents
Adversely rated credits, including loans requiring close monitoring, are included on a monthly loan
watch list. Other loans are added whenever any adverse circumstances are detected which might
affect the borrowers ability to meet the terms of the loan. This could be initiated by any of the
following:
| Delinquency of a scheduled loan payment; | ||
| Deterioration in the borrowers financial condition identified in a review of periodic financial statements; | ||
| Decrease in the value of collateral securing the loan; or | ||
| Change in the economic environment in which the borrower operates. |
Loans on the watch list require periodic detailed loan status reports, including recommended
corrective actions, prepared by the responsible loan officer, which are discussed at each monthly
loan committee meeting.
Downgrades of loan risk ratings may be initiated by the responsible loan officer, internal loan
review, the Watch List Committee, the Loan Committee, or senior lending personnel at any time.
Upgrades of certain risk ratings may only be made with the concurrence of both the Chief Credit
Officer and Chief Operating Officer.
The Companys loan underwriting policies limit individual loan officers to specific amounts of
lending authority, over which various committees must get involved and approve a credit. The
Companys underwriting policies require an analysis of a borrowers ability to pay the loan and
interest on a timely basis in accordance with the loan agreement. Collateral is then considered as
a secondary source of payment, should the borrower not be able to pay.
The Company conducts weekly loan committee meetings with all of its loan officers, including the
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. This committee may
approve individual credit relationships up to $2,500,000. Larger credits must go to the Loan
Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of three Directors on a rotating basis.
The Companys legal lending limit was $39,298,803 at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the reserve for possible loan losses was $32,717,084 and $14,196,047,
respectively, or 2.96% and 1.15% of net outstanding loans, respectively. The following table
summarizes the Companys loan loss experience for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009. The increase in the reserve is attributed to a number of factors, including the elevated
levels of nonperforming loans and continued declines in the value of real estate securing the
Banks loans. The economy continues to present challenges to our borrowers and it could be likely
that others will meet with difficulty in meeting obligations.
29
Table of Contents
Three-Month Periods | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Average loans outstanding |
$ | 1,125,420 | $ | 1,245,164 | ||||
Reserve at beginning of year |
$ | 32,221 | $ | 14,306 | ||||
Provision for possible loan losses |
7,692 | 2,250 | ||||||
39,913 | 16,556 | |||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||
Real estate |
(1,999 | ) | (409 | ) | ||||
Other |
(27 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Construction |
(4,962 | ) | (2,031 | ) | ||||
Residential |
(307 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||
Consumer |
| (14 | ) | |||||
Overdrafts |
| | ||||||
Total charge-offs |
(7,295 | ) | (2,732 | ) | ||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||
Commercial loans: |
||||||||
Real estate |
36 | | ||||||
Other |
32 | | ||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Construction |
14 | 364 | ||||||
Residential |
9 | 2 | ||||||
Consumer |
8 | 6 | ||||||
Overdrafts |
| | ||||||
Total recoveries |
99 | 372 | ||||||
Reserve at end of period |
$ | 32,717 | $ | 14,196 | ||||
Net charge-offs to average loans |
2.59 | % | 0.77 | % | ||||
Ending reserve to net outstanding loans at end of period |
2.96 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||
Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve
maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.
In determining the reserve and the related provision for loan losses, three principal elements are
considered:
| Specific allocations based upon probable losses identified during a quarterly review of the loan portfolio; |
| Allocations based principally on the Companys risk rating formulas; and |
| An unallocated allowance based on subjective factors. |
The first element reflects managements estimate of probable losses based upon a systematic review
of specific loans considered to be impaired. These estimates are based upon collateral exposure,
using the most current fair values of collateral.
The second element reflects the application of our loan rating system. This rating system is
similar to those employed by state and Federal banking regulators. In addition, the analysis
considers the following internal and external factors that may cause estimated losses to differ
from historical loss experience. Those factors include (a) changes in lending policies and
procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices;
(b) changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments, including the
condition of various market segments; (c) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; (d)
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff; (e) changes in the
trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, and trends in the volume of
non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications; and (f) the existence
and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations and the
effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level
of estimated credit losses in the Banks current portfolio.
The unallocated allowance is based on managements evaluation of conditions that are not directly
reflected in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the
inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher
30
Table of Contents
degree of uncertainty because they may not be identified with specific problem credits or portfolio
segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance include the
following:
| General economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas; | ||
| Credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions); | ||
| Collateral values; | ||
| Loan volumes and concentrations; | ||
| Competitive factors resulting in shifts in underwriting criteria; | ||
| Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments; | ||
| Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio; | ||
| Bank regulatory examination results; and | ||
| Findings of our internal loan review department. |
Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our entire lending
staff. To the extent that any of these conditions are evidenced by a specifically identifiable
problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, managements estimate of the effect
of such conditions may be reflected as a specific reserve allocation applicable to such credit or
portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions are not evidenced by a specifically identifiable
problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, managements evaluation of the
probable loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.
Based on this quantitative and qualitative analysis, provisions are made to the reserve for
possible loan losses. Such provisions are reflected in our consolidated statements of income.
The allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses by loan category is a result of the above
analysis. The allocation methodology applied by the Company, designed to assess the adequacy of
the reserve for possible loan losses, focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan
portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, the risk inherent in
specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic
conditions, and historical losses normally experienced in our banking market for each portfolio
category. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the reserve for
possible loan losses is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend
of future loan losses in any particular loan category.
The total reserve for possible loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the
portfolio. Management continues to target and maintain the reserve for possible loan losses equal
to the allocation methodology plus an unallocated portion, as determined by economic conditions and
other qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the Companys borrowers, as described above.
In determining an adequate balance in the reserve for possible loan losses, management places its
emphasis as follows: evaluation of the loan portfolio with regard to potential future exposure on
loans to specific customers and industries; reevaluation of each watch list loan or loan classified
by supervisory authorities; and an overall review of the remaining portfolio in light of loan loss
experience normally experienced in our banking market. Any problems or loss exposure estimated in
these categories is provided for in the total current period reserve.
Management views the reserve for possible loan losses as being available for all potential or as
yet presently unidentifiable loan losses which may occur in the future. The risk of future losses
that is inherent in the loan portfolio is not precisely attributable to a particular loan or
category of loans.
The perception of risk with respect to particular loans within the portfolio will change over time
as a result of the characteristics and performance of those loans, overall economic and market
trends, and the actual and expected trends in nonperforming loans. Consequently, while there are no
specific allocations of the reserve resulting from economic or market conditions or actual or
expected trends in nonperforming loans, these factors are considered in the initial assignment of
risk ratings to loans, subsequent changes to those risk ratings and to a lesser extent in the size
of any unallocated allowance amount.
31
Table of Contents
The unallocated portion of the reserve for loan losses is based on factors that cannot necessarily
be associated with a specific loan or loan category. Management focuses on the following factors
and conditions:
| There is a level of imprecision necessarily inherent in the estimates of expected loan losses, and the unallocated reserve gives reasonable assurance that this level of imprecision in our formula methodologies is adequately provided for. |
| Pressures to maintain and grow the loan portfolio with increasing competition from de novo institutions and larger competitors have to some degree affected credit granting criteria adversely. The Company monitors the disposition of all credits, which have been approved through its Executive Loan Committee, in order to better understand competitive shifts in underwriting criteria. |
While the Company has no significant specific industry concentration risk, analysis showed that
over 91% of the loan portfolio was dependent on real estate collateral at March 31, 2010, including
commercial real estate, residential real estate, and construction and land development loans. The
following table details the significant categories of real estate loans as a percentage of total
regulatory capital:
Real Estate Loan Balances as a Percentage | ||||||||||||
of Total Regulatory Capital | ||||||||||||
3/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | 3/31/2009 | ||||||||||
Construction, land development and other
other land loans |
96 | % | 112 | % | 97 | % | ||||||
Nonfarm nonresidential: |
||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
130 | % | 112 | % | 71 | % | ||||||
Non-owner occupied |
331 | % | 340 | % | 296 | % | ||||||
1-4 family closed end loans |
39 | % | 40 | % | 45 | % | ||||||
Multi-family |
85 | % | 86 | % | 61 | % | ||||||
Other |
22 | % | 22 | % | 19 | % |
The Company has policies, guidelines, and individual risk ratings in place to control this
exposure at the transaction level; however, given the volatile nature of interest rates and their
affect on the real estate market and the likely adverse impacts on borrowers debt service coverage
ratios, management believes it is prudent to maintain an unallocated allowance component.
Additionally, the Company continues to be committed to a strategy of acquiring relationships with
larger commercial and industrial companies. Management believes it is prudent to increase the
percentage of the unallocated reserve to cover the risks inherent in the higher average loan size
of these relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of the Banks ability to meet the borrowing needs and the deposit
withdrawal requirements of their customers. The composition of assets and liabilities is actively
managed to maintain the appropriate level of liquidity in the balance sheet. Management is guided
by regularly-reviewed policies when determining the appropriate portion of total assets which
should be comprised of readily-marketable assets available to meet conditions that are reasonably
expected to occur.
Liquidity is primarily provided to the Banks through earning assets, including Federal funds sold
and maturities and principal payments in the investment portfolio, all funded through continued
deposit growth and short-term borrowings. Secondary sources of liquidity available to the Banks
include the sale of securities included in the available-for-sale category (with a carrying value
of $238,712,309 at March 31, 2010, of which approximately $169,103,313 is pledged to secure
deposits and repurchase agreements) and borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the
Federal Home Loan Banks. Maturing loans also provide liquidity on an ongoing basis. Accordingly,
Bank management believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal
requirements or increases in loan demand.
The Banks have borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the Federal Home Loan Banks
of Des Moines and Atlanta. The Banks have Federal funds lines of credit totaling $23,000,000
through correspondent banks, of which $23,000,000 was available at March 31, 2010. Also, Reliance
Bank has a credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines in the amount of $175,299,159
and availability under that line was $78,708,185 as of March 31, 2010. Reliance Bank, FSB
maintained a credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta in the amount of $10,410,000,
of which $6,310,000 was available at
32
Table of Contents
March 31, 2010. In addition, Reliance Bank maintained a line of credit with the Federal Reserve
Bank in the amount of $33,573,652, all of which was available at March 31, 2010. As of March 31,
2010, the combined availability under these arrangements totaled $141,591,837. Bank management
believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal requirements or
increases in loan demand. However, availability of the funds noted above is subject to the Banks
maintaining a satisfactory rating by their regulators. If the Banks were to become increasingly
distressed and the Banks ratings lowered, it could negatively impact the ability of the Banks to
borrow the funds.
The Federal Reserve Board established risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies,
which require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of Tier 1 Capital and Total
Capital. Tier 1 Capital consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders equity and
minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and 50% of
investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries. Total capital consists of, in addition to Tier 1
Capital, mandatory convertible debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 Capital, subordinated
and other qualifying term debt and a portion of the reserve for possible loan losses, less the
remaining 50% of qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated with reference
to risk-weighted assets, which include both on-and off-balance sheet exposures to capital. The
minimum required ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of
Tier 1 Capital.
In addition, Federal Reserve guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio
of Tier 1 Capital to average total assets (net of goodwill) of 3%. The Federal Reserve guidelines
state that all of these capital ratios constitute the minimum requirements for the most
highly-rated banking organizations, and other banking organizations are expected to maintain
capital at higher levels.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company and Banks were each in compliance with the Tier 1 Capital ratio
requirement and all other applicable regulatory capital requirements, as calculated in accordance
with risk-based capital guidelines. The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company, Reliance
Bank, and Reliance Bank, FSB at March 31, 2010 are presented in the following table:
To Be a Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Bank Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Action Provision | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 142,998 | 11.47 | % | $ | 99,725 | ³ 8.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank |
122,611 | 10.41 | % | 94,233 | ³ 8.0 | % | $ | 117,791 | ³ 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank, FSB |
12,173 | 16.03 | % | 6,076 | ³ 8.0 | % | 7,596 | ³ 10.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 126,824 | 10.17 | % | $ | 49,862 | ³ 4.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank |
107,746 | 9.15 | % | 47,116 | ³ 4.0 | % | $ | 70,675 | ³ 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank, FSB |
11,186 | 14.73 | % | 3,038 | ³ 4.0 | % | 4,557 | ³ 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 126,824 | 8.52 | % | $ | 59,559 | ³ 4.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank |
107,746 | 7.71 | % | 55,879 | ³ 4.0 | % | $ | 69,849 | ³ 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Reliance Bank, FSB |
11,186 | 12.13 | % | 3,689 | ³ 4.0 | % | 4,611 | ³5.0 | % |
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective
action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized banking institutions. The extent of the
regulators powers depend on whether the banking institution in question is well capitalized,
adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized, which are defined by the regulators as follows:
Total | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | ||||||||||
Risk-Based | Risk-Based | Leverage | ||||||||||
Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | ||||||||||
Well capitalized |
10 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | ||||||
Adequately capitalized |
8 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
Undercapitalized |
<8 | <4 | <4 | |||||||||
Significantly undercapitalized |
<6 | <3 | <3 | |||||||||
Critically undercapitalized |
* | * | * |
* | A critically undercapitalized institution is defined as having a tangible equity to total assets ratio of 2% or less. |
33
Table of Contents
Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators corrective
powers include: requiring the submission of a capital restoration plan; placing limits on asset
growth and restrictions on activities; requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock
(including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; restricting transactions with affiliates;
restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits; ordering a new election of
directors of the institution; requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed;
prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; requiring the
institution to divest certain subsidiaries; prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on
subordinated debt; and ultimately, appointing a receiver of the institution. The capital category
of an institution also determines in part the amount of the premium assessed against the
institution for FDIC insurance. At March 31, 2010, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB were
considered well capitalized banks.
Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
Through the normal course of operations, the Banks have entered into certain contractual
obligations and other commitments. Such obligations relate to funding of operations through
deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for premises and equipment. As financial services
providers, the Banks routinely enter into commitments to extend credit. While contractual
obligations represent future cash requirements of the Banks, a significant portion of commitments
to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same
credit policies and approval processes accorded to loans made by the Banks.
The required contractual obligations and other commitments at March 31, 2010 were as follows:
Over 1 Year | ||||||||||||||||
Total Cash | Less Than 1 | Less Than 5 | Over 5 | |||||||||||||
Commitment | Year | Years | Years | |||||||||||||
Operating leases |
$ | 7,757,611 | $ | 716,022 | $ | 2,208,765 | $ | 4,832,824 | ||||||||
Time deposits |
593,445,592 | 402,076,716 | 183,074,140 | 8,294,736 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
99,000,000 | 6,000,000 | 26,000,000 | 67,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
117,792,139 | 60,375,663 | 25,712,325 | 31,704,151 | ||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
13,172,904 | 4,679,750 | 8,493,154 | |
Impact of New and Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
None
Part I Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management of rate sensitive earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities remains a key to
the Companys profitability. The Companys operations are subject to risk resulting from interest
rate fluctuations to the extent that there is a difference between the amount of the Companys
interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid or
withdrawn, mature or are repriced in specified periods. The principal objective of the Companys
asset/liability management activities is to provide maximum levels of net interest income while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and facilitating the funding
needs of the Company. The Banks utilize gap analyses as the primary quantitative tool in measuring
the amount of interest rate risk that is present at the end of each quarter. Reliance Bank
management also monitors, on a quarterly basis the variability of earnings and fair value of equity
in various interest rate environments. Bank management evaluates the Banks risk position to
determine whether the level of exposure is significant enough to hedge a potential decline in
earnings and value or whether the Banks can safely increase risk to enhance returns.
34
Table of Contents
The asset/liability management process, which involves structuring the balance sheet to allow
approximately equal amounts of assets and liabilities to reprice at the same time, is a dynamic
process essential to minimize the effect of fluctuating interest rates on net interest income. The
following table reflects the Companys interest rate gap (rate-sensitive assets minus
rate-sensitive liabilities) analysis as of March 31, 2010, individually and cumulatively, through
various time horizons:
Remaining Maturity if Fixed Rate; | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earliest Possible Repricing Interval if Floating Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Over 3 months | Over 1 year | |||||||||||||||||||
3 months | through | through | ||||||||||||||||||
or less | 12 months | 5 years | Over 5 years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 441,805,666 | 135,471,944 | 490,330,237 | 37,045,188 | 1,104,653,035 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities, at amortized cost |
44,377,578 | 48,912,265 | 120,930,098 | 22,966,069 | 237,186,010 | |||||||||||||||
Other interest-earnings assets |
43,486,792 | | | | 43,486,792 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 529,670,036 | 184,384,209 | 611,260,335 | 60,011,257 | 1,385,325,837 | ||||||||||||||
Interest bearing-liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 561,917,746 | 31,574 | | | 561,949,320 | ||||||||||||||
Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more |
59,122,375 | 129,761,23 | 66,081,184 | 3,490,799 | 258,455,589 | |||||||||||||||
All other time deposits |
63,616,380 | 149,576,730 | 116,992,956 | 4,803,937 | 334,990,003 | |||||||||||||||
Nondeposit interest-bearing liabilities |
19,645,803 | 6,131,168 | 26,000,000 | 67,000,000 | 118,776,971 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 704,302,304 | 285,500,703 | 209,074,140 | 75,294,736 | 1,274,171,883 | ||||||||||||||
Gap by period |
$ | (174,632,268 | ) | (101,116,494 | ) | 402,186,195 | (15,283,479 | ) | 111,153,954 | |||||||||||
Cumulative gap |
$ | (174,632,268 | ) | (275,748,762 | ) | 126,437,433 | 111,153,954 | 111,153,954 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest-
sensitive liabilities |
0.75x | 0.65x | 2.92x | 0.80x | 1.09x | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative ratio of interest-sensitive assets to
interest-sensitive liabilities |
0.75x | 0.72x | 1.11x | 1.09x | 1.09x | |||||||||||||||
A gap report is used by Bank management to review any significant mismatch between the
repricing points of the Banks rate sensitive assets and liabilities in certain time horizons. A
negative gap indicates that more liabilities reprice in that particular time frame and, if rates
rise, these liabilities will reprice faster than the assets. A positive gap would indicate the
opposite. Management has set policy limits specifying acceptable levels of interest rate risk as
measured by the gap report. Gap reports can be misleading in that they capture only the repricing
timing within the balance sheet, and fail to capture other significant risks such as basis risk and
embedded options risk. Basis risk involves the potential for the spread relationship between rates
to change under different rate environments and embedded options risk relates to the potential for
the alteration of the level and/or timing of cash flows given changes in rates. As indicated in the
above table, the Company operates on a short-term basis similar to most other financial
institutions, as its liabilities, with savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts included,
could reprice more quickly than its assets. However, the process of asset/liability management in a
financial institution is dynamic. Bank management believes its current asset/liability management
program will allow adequate reaction time for trends in the marketplace as they occur, allowing
maintenance of adequate net interest margins.
Bank management also uses fair market value of equity analyses to help identify longer-term risk
that may reside on the current balance sheet. The fair market value of equity is represented by the
present value of all future income streams generated by the current balance sheet. The Company
measures the fair market value of equity as the net present value of all asset and liability cash
flows discounted at forward rates suggested by the current Treasury curve plus appropriate credit
spreads. This representation of the change in the fair market value of equity under different rate
scenarios gives insight into the magnitude of risk to future earnings due to rate changes.
Management has set policy limits relating to declines in the market value of equity. The results of
these analyses at March 31, 2010 indicate that the Companys fair market value of equity would
decrease 1.5% and 1.7% from an immediate and sustained parallel decrease in interest rates of 100
and 200 basis points, respectively, and increase 2.6% from a corresponding increase in interest
rates of either 100 or 200 basis points.
Part I Item 4T Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)).
As a result of material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to net
losses available to common shareholders after increasing the net loss for preferred dividends paid
by the Company, which require an adjustment to the previously reported net loss per share data
reported by the Company, our management has reassessed the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of March 31, 2010.
On March 4, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that the
Companys audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as interim
financial statements in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ending March 31, June
30 and September 30, 2010, did not properly account for certain items referred to in the preceding
paragraph and, as a result, should not be relied upon. The Audit Committee has authorized and
directed the officers of the Company to restate its audited financial statements and interim
quarterly financial statements included in the above referenced filing as of and for the periods
covered by such filings.
The Company has implemented certain changes in our internal controls as of the date of
this report to address the material weaknesses and believes that such weaknesses have been
remediated.
35
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15) that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Part II Item 1 Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings
arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such proceedings pending or
threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries which, if determined adversely, would have a
material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Part II Item 1A Risk Factors
There have not been any material changes in the risk factors as disclosed in the Companys
annual report in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Part II Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company sold 80 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, no par value,
Series C, at the offering price of $1,000 per share for the period ended on March 31, 2010. The
offering was extended to existing shareholders who are accredited investors (as such term is
defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and to other accredited
investors to subscribe for and purchase shares of this series, and was intended to qualify for
exemption from registration pursuant to Regulation D. The purpose of the Offering, which is still
active, is to generate capital, as well as to remain well capitalized.
Part II Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Part II Item 4 [Removed and Reserved]
Part II Item 5 Other Information
(a) None.
(b) There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to the Companys Board of Directors implemented during the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Part II Item 6 Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IV | |||
Allan D. Ivie, IV | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ Dale E. Oberkfell | |||
Dale E. Oberkfell | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date:
March 16, 2011
37