Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc.c63008exv32w1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc.c63008exv31w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc.c63008exv32w2.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Reliance Bancshares, Inc.c63008exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                     to                    
Commission file number: 000-52588
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Missouri   43-1823071
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
     
10401 Clayton Road
Frontenac, Missouri

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  63131
(Zip Code)
(314) 569-7200
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
     o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer: o   Accelerated filer: o   Non-accelerated filer: o   Smaller reporting company þ
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 11, 2010, the Registrant had 21,023,694 shares of outstanding Class A common stock, $0.25 par value; 40,000 shares of outstanding Class A preferred stock, no par value; 2,000 shares of outstanding Class B preferred stock, no par value; and 380 shares of outstanding Class C preferred stock, no par value.
 
 

 


Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE — RESTATEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q (Amendment No. 1) is being filed by Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) to amend and restate its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 14, 2010 (the Initial Form 10-Q). For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, and in accordance with Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), Items 1 and 2 under Part I of our Initial Form 10-Q have been amended and restated in their entirety. In addition, Item 4T is being amended solely to add new certifications in accordance with Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. Other than the Items outlined above, there are no changes to the Initial Form 10-Q. Except as otherwise specifically noted, all information contained herein is as of March 31, 2010 and does not reflect any events or changes that have occurred subsequent to that date. We are not required to and we have not updated any forward-looking statements previously included in the Initial Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2010. We have not amended, and do not intend to amend, any of our other previously filed reports for the periods affected by the restatement. Our previously issued interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in those reports should no longer be relied upon.
This Amendment No. 1 is required due to certain disclosure omissions in the Initial Form 10-Q related to net losses available to common shareholders after increasing the net loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, which required an adjustment of the previously reported net loss per share data included in the Company’s interim condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
These restatements had no effect on the Company’s consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or its consolidated stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2010. Net loss available to common shareholders, after increasing the loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, increased from the $(0.12) per share originally disclosed to $(0.15) per share as restated, for both basic and fully-diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
For the convenience of the reader, this Quarterly Report sets forth the original filing in its entirety.
For additional information regarding the restatement, see Note 1 to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report.
This Amendment No. 1 includes changes in “Item 4T — Controls and Procedures” and reflects management’s restated assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2010. This restatement of management’s assessment regarding disclosure controls and procedures results from material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the above described restatements. The information required in this restatement was previously omitted and, while it had no effect on the Company’s consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2010, such information should have been disclosed in our March 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements. The Company has implemented certain changes in our internal controls as of the date of this report to address these material weaknesses, and believe such weaknesses have been remediated. There can be no assurance that our remedial efforts will be effective nor can there be any assurances that the Company will not incur losses due to internal or external acts intended to defraud, misappropriate assets, or circumvent applicable law or our system of internal controls. See “Item 4T — Controls and Procedures.”

 


 

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
    Page
   
   
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  15
  34
  35
   
  36
  36
  36
  36
  36
  36
  36
  37
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2010 and 2009 and December 31, 2009
                         
    March 31,        
                    December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009  
    (unaudited)          
ASSETS
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 11,488,611       9,900,850       11,928,668  
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
    43,486,792       2,820,878       15,767,862  
Federal funds sold
          1,351,000        
Investments in available-for-sale debt and equity securities, at fair value
    238,712,309       288,723,123       284,119,556  
Loans
    1,104,653,035       1,235,360,011       1,140,881,275  
Less — Deferred loan fees/costs
    (43,964 )     (612,034 )     (84,741 )
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (32,717,084 )     (14,196,047 )     (32,221,569 )
 
                 
Net loans
    1,071,891,987       1,220,551,930       1,108,574,965  
 
                 
Premises and equipment, net
    41,686,176       43,687,967       42,210,536  
Accrued interest receivable
    5,290,542       6,653,744       5,647,887  
Other real estate owned
    33,451,884       15,489,980       29,085,943  
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $111,301, $95,013 and $107,229 at March 31, 2010 and 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively
    133,018       149,306       137,090  
Goodwill
    1,149,192       1,149,192       1,149,192  
Other assets
    37,724,360       16,681,404       38,085,885  
 
                 
 
  $ 1,485,014,871       1,607,159,374       1,536,707,584  
 
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Deposits:
                       
Non-interest-bearing
  $ 57,287,630       52,601,034       71,829,581  
Interest-bearing
    1,155,394,912       1,214,792,775       1,194,230,616  
 
                 
Total deposits
    1,212,682,542       1,267,393,809       1,266,060,197  
Short-term borrowings
    19,776,971       17,157,546       12,696,932  
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
    99,000,000       136,000,000       104,000,000  
Accrued interest payable
    1,954,220       3,591,620       2,194,952  
Other liabilities
    3,377,511       2,771,897       2,086,079  
 
                 
Total liabilities
    1,336,791,244       1,426,914,872       1,387,038,160  
 
                 
Commitments and contingencies
                       
Stockholders’ equity:
                       
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized:
                       
Series A, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding
    40,000,000       40,000,000       40,000,000  
Series B, 2,000 shares issued and outstanding
    2,000,000       2,000,000       2,000,000  
Series C, 380 and 300 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    380,000             300,000  
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized, 20,972,091, 20,770,781, and 20,972,091 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively
    5,243,023       5,192,696       5,243,023  
Surplus
    121,888,348       122,331,181       122,334,757  
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
    (22,295,101 )     10,753,950       (19,796,396 )
Treasury stock, 24,514 shares at March 31, 2009
          (335,280 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive income — net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities
    1,007,357       301,955       (411,960 )
 
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    148,223,627       180,244,502       149,669,424  
 
                 
 
  $ 1,485,014,871       1,607,159,374       1,536,707,584  
 
                 
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
                 
    (restated)
2010
    2009  
Interest income:
               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 15,452,027       17,671,243  
Interest on debt securities:
               
Taxable
    1,833,350       1,955,985  
Exempt from Federal income taxes
    306,262       340,054  
Interest on short-term investments
    16,555       16,963  
 
           
Total interest income
    17,608,194       19,984,245  
 
           
Interest expense:
               
Interest on deposits
    5,790,589       9,482,976  
Interest on short-term borrowings
    30,419       260,288  
Interest on long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
    968,919       1,231,970  
 
           
Total interest expense
    6,789,927       10,975,234  
 
           
Net interest income
    10,818,267       9,009,011  
Provision for possible loan losses
    7,692,000       2,250,000  
 
           
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses
    3,126,267       6,759,011  
 
           
Noninterest income:
               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    224,476       207,638  
Net gains on sale of debt securities
    64,691        
Other noninterest income
    365,415       327,131  
 
           
Total noninterest income
    654,582       534,769  
 
           
Noninterest expense:
               
Salaries and employee benefits
    3,264,982       3,880,456  
Occupancy and equipment expense
    1,087,020       1,125,932  
Other real estate expense
    1,373,787       309,663  
FDIC assessments
    784,518       503,533  
Data processing
    432,543       474,674  
Amortization of intangible assets
    4,072       4,072  
Other noninterest expenses
    807,590       942,802  
 
           
Total noninterest expense
    7,754,512       7,241,132  
 
           
Income (loss) before applicable income taxes
    (3,973,663 )     52,648  
Applicable income tax benefit
    (1,474,958 )     (38,226 )
 
           
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     90,874  
 
           
 
               
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     90,874  
Preferred stock dividends
    (548,891 )      
 
           
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
    (3,047,596 )     90,874  
 
           
Per share amounts:
               
Basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ (0.15 )     < 0.01  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    20,972,091       20,746,267  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ (0.15 )     <0.01  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    20,972,091       20,818,840  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     90,874  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income before tax:
               
 
               
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities
    2,215,171       616,492  
 
               
Reclassification adjustments on available-for-sale security gains included in net loss
    (64,691 )      
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income before tax
    2,150,480       616,492  
 
               
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income
    731,163       209,607  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
    1,419,317       406,885  
 
           
 
               
Total comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (1,079,388 )     497,759  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
                                                         
                                            Accumulated     Total  
                            Retained earnings             other     stock-  
    Preferred     Common             (accumulated     Treasury     comprehensive     holders’  
    stock     stock     Surplus     deficit)     stock     income     equity  
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $       5,192,696       124,193,318       10,663,076       (335,280 )     (104,930 )     139,608,880  
 
                                                       
Net income
                      90,874                   90,874  
 
                                                       
Issuance of 40,000 shares of Series A preferred stock
    40,000,000                                     40,000,000  
 
                                                       
Exercise of warrants for 2,000 shares of Series B preferred stock
    2,000,000             (2,000,000 )                        
 
                                                       
Stock issuance costs
                (7,422 )                       (7,422 )
 
                                                       
Compensation cost recognized for stock options granted
                137,785                         137,785  
 
                                                       
Amortization of restricted stock
                7,500                         7,500  
 
                                                       
Change in valuation of available-for-sale securities, net of related tax effect
                                  406,885       406,885  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 42,000,000       5,192,696       122,331,181       10,753,950       (335,280 )     301,955       180,244,502  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 42,300,000       5,243,023       122,334,757       (19,796,396 )           (411,960 )     149,669,424  
 
                                                       
Net loss
                      (2,498,705 )                 (2,498,705 )
 
                                                       
Issuance of 80 shares of Series C preferred stock
    80,000                                     80,000  
 
                                                       
Dividends on preferred stock
                (548,891 )                       (548,891 )
 
                                                       
Stock issuance costs
                (8,906 )                       (8,906 )
 
                                                       
Stock option expense
                96,857                         96,857  
 
                                                       
Amortization of restricted stock
                14,531                         14,531  
 
                                                       
Change in valuation of available-for-sale securities, net of related tax effect
                                  1,419,317       1,419,317  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 42,380,000       5,243,023       121,888,348       (22,295,101 )           1,007,357       148,223,627  
 
                                         
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
                 
    2010     2009  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     90,874  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    946,072       1,288,475  
Provision for possible loan losses
    7,692,000       2,250,000  
Net gains on sale of debt securities
    (64,691 )      
Net losses on sales and writedowns of other real estate owned
    774,301       110,000  
Stock option compensation cost
    96,857       137,785  
Amortization of restricted stock expense
    14,531       7,500  
Mortgage loans originated for sale in the secondary market
    (5,082,589 )     (10,770,860 )
Mortgage loans sold in the secondary market
    4,802,789       11,366,360  
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
    357,345       (1,229,636 )
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (240,732 )     (313,321 )
Other operating activities, net
    921,794       (535,429 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    7,718,972       2,401,748  
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchase of available-for-sale debt securities
    (11,087,421 )     (153,186,749 )
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale debt securities
    51,565,291       58,177,906  
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale debt securities
    6,738,269        
Net decrease in loans
    23,513,337       16,271,700  
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
    617,199       222,972  
Construction expenditures to finish other real estate owned
          (12,308 )
Purchase of premises and equipment, net
    (11,361 )     (126,296 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    71,335,314       (78,652,775 )
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
    (53,377,655 )     39,346,510  
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
    7,080,039       (46,761,298 )
Payments of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
    (5,000,000 )      
Issuance of preferred stock
    80,000       40,000,000  
 
           
Dividends on preferred stock
    (548,891 )      
Payment of stock issuance costs
    (8,906 )     (7,422 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (51,775,413 )     32,577,790  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    27,278,873       (43,673,237 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    27,696,530       57,745,965  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 54,975,403       14,072,728  
 
           
Supplemental information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 7,030,659       11,288,555  
Noncash transactions:
               
Warrant exercise and issuance of Series B preferred stock
          2,000,000  
Transfers to other real estate owned in settlement of loans
    5,757,441       672,985  
Loans made to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned
          151,511  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, F.S.B. (hereinafter referred to as “the Banks”). The Company also has loan production offices in Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona.
The Company and Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing financial products throughout the St. Louis, Houston and Phoenix metropolitan areas and southwestern Florida. Additionally, the Company and Banks are subject to the regulations of certain Federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and Banks conform to generally accepted accounting principles within the banking industry. In compiling the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in a short period of time include the determination of the reserve for possible loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned and stock options, and determination of possible impairment of intangible assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain amounts in the 2009 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net loss or stockholders’ equity.
Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Company’s previously issued Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
Principles of Consolidation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Banks. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Accounting
The Company and Banks utilize the accrual basis of accounting, which includes in the total of net income all revenues earned and expenses incurred, regardless of when actual cash payments are received or paid. The Company is also required to report comprehensive income, of which net income is a component. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances arising from non-owner sources, including all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments by, and distributions to, owners.
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include due from banks, interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions (all of which are payable on demand), and Federal funds sold. Certain balances are maintained in other financial institutions that participate in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Under this program, these balances are fully guaranteed by the FDIC through December 31, 2013. After this period, these balances would generally exceed the level of deposits insured by the FDIC.

8


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock Issuance Costs
The Company incurs certain costs associated with the issuance of its common stock. Such costs are recorded as a reduction of equity capital.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events after the consolidated balance sheet date of March 31, 2010 through May 14, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued with the filing of this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of earnings per share which could occur under the treasury stock method if contracts to issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised. The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    (restated)
2010
    2009  
Basic
               
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  $ (3,047,596 )     90,874  
 
           
 
               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,972,091       20,746,267  
 
           
 
               
Basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ (0.15 )     < 0.01  
 
           
 
               
Diluted
               
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  $ (3,047,596 )     90,874  
 
           
 
               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,972,091       20,746,267  
Effect of dilutive stock options
          72,573  
 
           
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,972,091       20,818,840  
 
           
 
               
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ (0.15 )     < 0.01  
 
           

9


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Restatement
On March 4, 2011, the Company determined that it needed to restate its previously issued interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and that these previously issued interim condensed consolidated financial statements should no longer be relied upon, as a result of the identification of certain omitted disclosures from the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements issued for those particular periods.
This restatement is required due to certain disclosure omissions in the previously issued interim condensed consolidated financial statements related to net losses available to common shareholders after increasing the net loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, which required an adjustment of the previously reported net loss per share data included in the Company’s interim condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
These restatements had no effect on the Company’s consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010, or its consolidated stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2010. Net loss available to common shareholders, after increasing the loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, increased from the $(0.12) per share originally disclosed to $(0.15) per share as restated, for both basic and fully-diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The effects of the restatement for additional disclosures and recalculation of per share information regarding the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders after payment of preferred dividends, by financial statement line item on the interim condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are as follows:
                         
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
    As reported     As restated          
Noninterest Expense
                       
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 3,264,982       3,264,982       3,880,456  
Occupancy and equipment expense
    1,087,020       1,087,020       1,125,932  
Other real estate expense
    1,373,787       1,373,787       309,663  
FDIC assessment
    784,518       784,518       503,533  
Data processing
    432,543       432,543       474,674  
Amortization of intangible assets
    4,072       4,072       4,072  
Other interest expenses
    807,590       807,590       942,802  
 
                 
Total noninterest expense
    7,754,512       7,754,512       7,241,132  
 
                 
Loss before income taxes
    (3,973,663 )     (3,973,663 )     52,648  
Applicable income tax benefit
    (1,474,958 )     (1,474,958 )     (38,226 )
 
                 
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     (2,498,705 )     90,874  
 
                 
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (2,498,705 )     (2,498,705 )     90,874  
Preferred stock dividends
            (548,891 )      
 
                   
Net loss attributed to common shareholders
            (3,047,596 )     90,874  
 
                   
 
                       
Per share amounts
                       
Basic loss per share
  $ (0.12 )     (0.15 )     <0.01  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 20,972,091       20,972,091       20,746,267  
Diluted loss per share
  $ (0.12 )     (0.15 )     <0.01  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 20,972,091       20,972,091       20,818,840  
NOTE 2 — INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets include the core deposit premium relating to the Company’s acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey, which is being amortized into noninterest expense on a straight-line basis over 15 years. Amortization of the core deposit intangible assets existing at March 31, 2010 will be $4,072 per quarter until completely amortized.
The excess of the Company’s consideration given in its acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill, an intangible asset on the consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is the Company’s only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, and the Company is required to test the intangible asset for impairment on an annual basis. Impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of an intangible asset with an indefinite life. No impairment writedown has thus far been required on this intangible asset.
NOTE 3 — STOCK OPTIONS
Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements over the period of service to which such compensation relates (generally the vesting period), and are measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The grant date values of share options are estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost would be recognized in an amount equal to

10


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.
No value was ascribed to the options granted in the first quarter of 2009 as the option price significantly exceeded the market value of the stock on the grant date; however, the Company’s common stock is not actively traded on any exchange. Accordingly, the availability of fair value information for the Company’s common stock is limited. In using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the options, several assumptions have been made in arriving at the estimated fair value of the options granted, including minimal or no volatility in the Company’s common stock price, expected forfeitures of 10%, no dividends paid on the common stock, an expected weighted average option life of six years, and a risk-free interest rate approximating the U.S. Treasury rates for the applicable duration period. Any change in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the effects of determining compensation costs.
Following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                                 
    Options Granted Under     Options Granted to Directors  
    Incentive Stock Option Plans     Under Nonqualified Plans  
    Weighted             Weighted        
    Average             Average        
    Option Price     Number     Option Price     Number  
    per Share     of Shares     per Share     of Shares  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009:
                               
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $ 7.61       1,553,450     $ 7.98       673,000  
Granted
    7.50       102,250       7.50       500  
Exercised
    8.81       (59,500 )            
 
                           
Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 7.56       1,596,200     $ 7.98       673,500  
 
                       
 
                               
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010:
                               
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 8.05       1,424,450     $ 8.41       666,816  
Forfeited
    10.44       (12,250 )     11.88       (5,816 )
 
                           
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 8.03       1,412,200     $ 8.38       661,000  
 
                       
The weighted average option prices for the 2,073,200 and 2,269,700 options outstanding at March 31, 2010 and 2009, were $8.14 and $7.68, respectively. At March 31, 2010, options to purchase an additional 522,050 shares of Company common stock were available for future grants under the various plans.
NOTE 4 — DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Banks issue financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of the business of meeting the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Banks have in particular classes of these financial instruments.
The Banks’ exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Banks use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as they do for financial instruments included on the balance sheets. Following is a summary of the Banks’ off-balance-sheet financial instruments at March 31, 2010:
         
Financial instruments for which contractual amounts represent:
       
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 117,792,139  
Standby letters of credit
    13,172,904  
 
     
 
  $ 130,965,043  
 
     

11


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Of the total commitments to extend credit at March 31, 2010, $22,089,331 were made at fixed rates of interest. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Banks evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Banks upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally residential or income-producing commercial property or equipment, on which the Banks generally have a superior lien.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Banks to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, for which draw requests have historically not been made thereon. Such guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at March 31, 2010:
                     
    Carrying     Estimated     Fair value
    amount     fair value     measurements
Balance sheet assets:
                   
Cash and due from banks
  $ 54,975,403     $ 54,975,403     Carrying value
Investment in debt securities
    238,712,309       238,712,309     Level 2 and 3 inputs
Loans, net
    1,071,891,987       1,081,954,920     Level 3 inputs
Accrued interest receivable
    5,290,542       5,290,542     Carrying value
 
               
 
  $ 1,370,870,241     $ 1,380,933,174      
 
               
 
                   
Balance sheet liabilities:
                   
Deposits
  $ 1,212,682,542     $ 1,223,712,780     Level 3 inputs
Short-term borrowings
    19,776,971       19,776,971     Carrying value
Long-term Federal Home
                   
Loan Bank borrowings
    99,000,000       120,234,818     Level 3 inputs
Accrued interest payable
    1,954,220       1,954,220     Carrying value
 
               
 
  $ 1,333,413,733     $ 1,365,678,789      
 
               
The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair value disclosures. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability regardless of the valuation techniques used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same, i.e., fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
  Level 1 — Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities and federal agency mortgage-backed securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are

12


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
      obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
 
    Level 2 – Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
 
    Level 3 – Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer, or value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value:
Cash and Other Short-Term Instruments – For cash and due from banks (including interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions), Federal funds sold, accrued interest receivable (payable), and short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value, as such instruments are due on demand and/or reprice in a short time period.
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities – Investments in available-for-sale debt securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s available-for-sale debt securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 and 3 valuations. For all debt securities other than the other debt securities described below, the market valuation utilizes several sources which include observable inputs rather than “significant unobservable inputs” and therefore, fall into the Level 2 category.
Included in other debt securities are collateralized debt obligation securities that are backed by trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, and insurance companies (TRUP CDOs). Given conditions in the debt markets at March 31, 2010, and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and new issue markets for TRUP CDOs, the few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are not reliable for the purpose of determining fair value at March 31, 2010, and an income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs is more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation techniques. Accordingly, the TRUP CDOs have been classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because significant adjustments are required to determine fair value at the measurement date, particularly regarding estimated default probabilities based on the credit quality of the specific issuer institutions for the TRUP CDOs. The TRUP CDOs are the only assets measured on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs. Following is further information regarding such assets:
         
Balance, at fair value on December 31, 2009
  $ 1,237,737  
Increase in fair value
    27,328  
Payments in kind
    4,572  
Principal payments received
    (3,550 )
 
     
Balance, at fair value on March 31, 2010
  $ 1,266,087  
 
     
Loans – The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans that are considered impaired. At March 31, 2010, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the underlying collateral is based upon an observable market price or current appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these assets in the nonrecurring Level 2 category. The total principal balance of impaired loans measured at fair value at March 31, 2010 was $107,178,682.
Deposits – The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and interest-bearing transaction account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Long-Term Borrowings – Rates currently available to the Company with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing long-term debt.

13


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit – The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements, the likelihood of the counterparties drawing on such financial instruments, and the present creditworthiness of such counterparties. The Company believes such commitments have been made on terms that are competitive in the markets in which it operates.

14


Table of Contents

Part I – Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following presents management’s discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) as of and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. This discussion and analysis is intended to review the significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, and provides a more comprehensive review which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements alone. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report and the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K/A.
The Company has prepared all of the consolidated financial information in this report in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. No assurances can be given that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
Forward-Looking Statements
Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, some of the information in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “could”, and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as updated from time to time in our subsequent SEC filings. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report, unless otherwise required by applicable rules.
Overview
The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida through the 23 locations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB (hereinafter referred to as the “Banks”). The Company was incorporated and began its development stage activities on July 24, 1998. Such development stage activities (i.e., applying for a banking charter, raising capital, acquiring property, and developing policies and procedures, etc.) led to the opening of Reliance Bank (as a new bank) upon receipt of all regulatory approvals on April 16, 1999. Since its opening in 1999 through March 31, 2010, Reliance Bank has added 20 branch locations in the St. Louis metropolitan area of Missouri and Illinois and Loan Production Offices (“LPOs”) in Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona and has grown its total assets, loans and deposits to $1.4 billion, $1.0 billion, and $1.1 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
Effective May 31, 2003, the Company purchased The Bank of Godfrey, a Godfrey, Illinois state banking institution. The Godfrey bank was merged with and into Reliance Bank on October 31, 2005. Reliance Bank also opened an LPO in Ft. Myers, Florida on July 1, 2004. Effective January 17, 2006, the Company opened a new Federal Savings Bank, Reliance Bank, FSB, in Ft. Myers, Florida, and loans totaling approximately $14 million that were originated by the Reliance Bank LPO were transferred to Reliance Bank, FSB. Since its opening in 2006, Reliance Bank, FSB has added three branch locations in southwestern Florida, and has grown its total assets, loans, and deposits to $99.3 million, $64.1 million, and $76.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, Reliance Bank’s total assets, total revenues, and net loss represented 93.35%, 93.94%, and 35.13%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated total assets, total revenue, and net loss. Reliance Bank, FSB’s total assets, total revenues, and net loss represented 6.68%, 6.07%, and 56.85%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated totals. The Company incurred a net loss of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
During 2008, the Company completed building its St. Louis metropolitan branch network. The Company plans to continue building its branch network in southwestern Florida at some time in the future, with four additional branches planned; however, the building of these branches has been suspended while management focuses on Reliance Bank, FSB’s profitability in light of the

15


Table of Contents

stressful market conditions in southwestern Florida. The Company’s branch expansion plans were designed to increase the Company’s market share in the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida and to allow the Company’s banking subsidiaries to compete with much larger financial institutions in these markets. The Houston and Phoenix LPOs are intended to benefit from commercial and residential lending and fee income generation opportunities in these larger and historically higher-growth markets.
The St. Louis metropolitan, southwestern Florida, Houston and Phoenix markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate are highly competitive in the financial services area. The Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing financial products throughout these markets.
The Company’s total consolidated assets were $1.5 billion at March 31, 2010, with loans and deposits totaling $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. The branch locations of the Banks have provided the Company with excellent strategic locations from which depositors and borrowers can be accessed. Three Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2008, six Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2006, one branch was opened in 2005, four branches were opened in 2004, two branches were opened in 2003, and one branch was opened each year in 2002, 2001, and 1999. Three Reliance Bank, FSB branches were opened in 2007 and one branch was opened in 2006, while one temporary branch was closed in 2009 due to local economic conditions.
The Company has funded its Banks’ branch expansion with several private placement stock offerings made to accredited investors since its inception. The Company has made a total of 12 such offerings since its inception and has sold 20,972,091 shares of Company Common Stock through March 31, 2010.
The Company’s consolidated net income (loss) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $(2,498,705) and $90,874, respectively. While the Company’s net interest income has grown, the provision for possible loan losses has increased, reflecting an increase in nonperforming loans, which has resulted from a substantial decline in the real estate and local economic markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate. These factors and their effect on the Company’s results of operations are discussed in more detail below.
Net interest income before provision for possible loan losses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $10,818,267 and $9,009,011, respectively. This growth in year-to-date net interest income resulted from a decrease in the rates paid on deposits and a shift in funding composition toward lower cost deposit products, reduced by increasing nonearning problem assets.
Interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $6,789,927 and $10,975,234, respectively. The Company continues to restructure its mix of deposits away from higher rate time deposits and short-term borrowings to lower cost savings and money market accounts. Also, the Company has been able to lower rates on retail deposits and still retain customer balances.
The substantial decline in the real estate market that has occurred over the past several years on a national scale has also been experienced in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. Residential home building and sales have declined significantly from the levels enjoyed in prior years. As a result, the Company has experienced a significant and continual increase in nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned). Nonperforming assets totaled $110.3 million at March 31, 2010 compared with $54.7 million at March 31, 2009. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans was 2.96% at March 31, 2010 compared with 1.15% at March 31, 2009. Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $7.2 million compared with $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The provision for possible loan losses charged to expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $7,692,000 and $2,250,000, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2010 was a direct reaction to the significant and continued decline of the real estate market. The Company believes it has identified existing problems in the portfolio and worked to address those issues; however, the economy continues to present challenges to our borrowers and it could be likely that others will experience difficulties in meeting obligations. See further discussion regarding the Company’s management of credit risk in the section below entitled “Risk Management.”
Total noninterest income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $654,582 and $534,769, respectively. A portion of the increase is attributed to a net gain of $64,691 from investment securities sold during the first quarter of 2010. No investment security sales occurred during the first quarter of 2009. Income generated from other real estate properties for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $80,860 and $14,101, respectively. Offsetting this gain was a decline in secondary mortgage fees for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, which were $43,173 and $110,642,

16


Table of Contents

respectively. Deposit service charge income increased by $16,838, or 8.11%, to $224,476 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $207,638 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to a larger transaction deposit base.
Total noninterest expense was $7,754,512 and $7,241,132 for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Increased expenses relating to other real estate owned (including losses on sales of foreclosed property and writedowns on properties still held, as well as holding costs on such properties), and increased FDIC insurance assessments more than offset the cost savings achieved in other operational expenses such as personnel and occupancy expenses.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was (37.12%) and (72.61%), respectively. The change in effective tax rates during these periods is a result of the level of tax-exempt interest income and its effect on the pre-tax income/loss.
Basic and fully-diluted loss per common share for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 were both $(0.15) (restated) per share. Basic and fully-diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 were both less than $0.01 per share.
Following are certain of the Company’s ratios generally followed in the banking industry for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                 
    As of and for the  
    Quarters Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Percentage of net income to:
               
Average total assets
    (0.67 %)     0.02 %
Average stockholders’ equity
    (6.73 %)     0.23 %
Percentage of common dividends declared to net income per common share
           
Percentage of average stockholders’ equity to average total assets
    9.97 %     9.98 %
Critical Accounting Policies
The impact and any associated risks related to the Company’s critical accounting policies on business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for year ended December 31, 2009 and the related “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our annual report in Form 10-K, which was filed March 26, 2010. Management believes there have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the first quarter of 2010.
Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net Interest Income
The Company’s net interest income increased $1,809,256 (20.08%) to $10,818,267 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 from the $9,009,011 earned during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. The Company’s net interest margin for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 3.13% and 2.41%, respectively. This increase in margin percentage is primarily attributed to lower cost of funds on the Company’s retail deposit products and a shift in funding composition toward lower cost deposit products.
Average interest earning assets for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $117,910,809 (7.67%) to $1,418,667,963 from the level of $1,536,578,772 for the first quarter of 2009. The decline was primarily due to a decrease in loan balances. Total average loans for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $119,744,586 (9.62%) to $1,125,419,848 from the level of $1,245,164,434 for the first quarter of 2009. The depressed economy has reduced the Company’s opportunities for loan growth in its current markets.
Total average investment securities for the first quarter of 2010 increased $4,810,972 (1.88%) to $260,488,350 from the level of $255,677,378 for the first quarter of 2009. The Company uses its investment portfolio to (a) provide support for borrowing arrangements for securities sold under repurchase agreements, (b) provide support for pledging purposes for deposits of governmental and municipal deposits over FDIC insurance limits, (c) provide a secondary source of liquidity through “laddered” maturities of such securities and their marketability, and (d) provide increased interest income over that which would be earned on

17


Table of Contents

overnight/daily fund investments. The total carrying value of securities pledged to secure public funds and repurchase agreements was approximately $169.1 million at March 31, 2010. The Banks have also pledged letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Banks totaling $1,690,974 as additional collateral to secure public funds at March 31, 2010.
Average short-term investments can fluctuate significantly from day to day based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the collected balances of customer deposits, loan demand and investment security maturities. Excess funds not invested in loans or investment securities are invested in overnight funds with various unaffiliated financial institutions. The average balances of such short-term investments for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $32,759,765 and $35,736,960, respectively.
A key factor in attempting to increase the Company’s net interest margin is to maintain a higher percentage of earning assets in the loan category, which is the Company’s highest earning asset category. However, average loans as a percentage of average earning assets were 79.33% for the first quarter of 2010, which was a 170 basis point decrease over the 81.03% achieved in the first quarter of 2009. This decline resulted from the depressed economic environment in the Banks’ market areas, resulting in fewer lending opportunities for the Banks.
Total average interest-bearing deposits for the first quarter of 2010 were $1,173,098,490, a decrease of $33,932,419 (2.81%) from the level of $1,207,030,909 for the first quarter of 2009. The Company has sought to lower its percentage of higher cost time deposit balances while increasing lower cost savings and interest bearing transaction account balances. Total average time deposits decreased $242,651,407 (28.02%) to $623,381,028 from a level of $866,032,435 for the first quarter of 2009. The Company increased average savings account deposits by $137,524,647 (76.01%) to $318,459,696 from $180,935,049 for the first quarter of 2009. Also, interest bearing transaction accounts increased $71,194,341 (44.48%) to $231,257,766 from a level of $160,063,425 for the first quarter of 2009.
The Company’s short-term borrowings consist of overnight funds borrowed from unaffiliated financial institutions and securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements with larger deposit customers. Average short term borrowings declined $25,758,765 (65.14%) to $13,783,129 from $39,541,894 at March 31, 2009. Short-term borrowings can fluctuate significantly based on short-term liquidity needs and growth in deposits.
The Company also uses longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a less expensive alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market, particularly when such longer-term fixed rate advances can be matched with longer-term fixed rate assets. The average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances declined $32,537,634 (23.92%) to $103,462,366 for the first quarter of 2010, compared with the $136,000,000 average balance for the first quarter of 2009. The decline is the result of the Company’s efforts to increase core retail deposits and reduce its percentage of wholesale funding.
The overall mix of the Company’s funding sources has a significant impact on the Company’s net interest margin. Following is a summary of the percentage of the various components of average interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all average interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits (hereinafter described as “total funding sources”) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31  
    2010     2009  
Average deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing
    4.71 %     4.02 %
 
           
Interest-bearing:
               
Transaction accounts
    17.08       11.11  
Savings
    23.52       12.56  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    20.01       25.21  
Other time deposits
    26.02       34.91  
 
           
Total average interest-bearing deposits
    86.63       83.79  
 
           
Total average deposits
    91.34       87.81  
 
           
Short-term borrowings
    1.02       2.75  
Longer-term advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
    7.64       9.44  
 
           
 
    100.00 %     100.00 %
 
           

18


Table of Contents

The composition of the Company’s deposit portfolio will fluctuate as recently added branches help to diversify the Company’s deposit base. The overall level of interest rates will also cause fluctuations between categories. The Company has sought to increase the percentage of its noninterest-bearing deposits to total funding sources and increase its percentage of lower cost savings and interest bearing transaction accounts. Through deposit campaigns, the Company increased its percentage of average savings accounts to 23.52% of total average funding sources, compared to 12.56% at March 31, 2009. Also, average interest bearing transaction accounts increased to 17.08% of total average funding sources from 11.11% at March 31, 2009. These increases allowed the Company to reduce the percentage of short term borrowings and longer term advances. Higher cost certificates of deposits declined as well, but continue to be the Company’s most significant funding source, which comprised 46.03% of total average funding sources during the first three months of 2010, as compared with 60.12% during the first three months of 2009. Certificates of deposit have a lagging effect with interest rate changes, as most certificates of deposit have longer maturities at fixed rates.
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the period indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and changes in yield/rates:
                         
    Amount of Increase (Decrease)  
    Change from 2010 to 2009 Due to  
            Yield/        
    Volume (1)     Rate (2)     Total  
Interest income:
                       
Loans
  $ (1,652,324 )     (566,757 )     (2,219,081 )
Investment securities:
                       
Taxable
    69,444       (192,079 )     (122,635 )
Exempt from Federal income taxes
    (48,501 )     18,885       (29,616 )
Short-term investments
    (1,330 )     922       (408 )
 
                 
Total interest income
    (1,632,711 )     (739,029 )     (2,371,740 )
 
                 
Interest Expense:
                       
Interest bearing transaction accounts
    211,400       (261,029 )     (49,629 )
Savings accounts
    663,810       (915,591 )     (251,781 )
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    (669,308 )     (717,097 )     (1,386,405 )
Other time deposits
    (1,207,784 )     (796,788 )     (2,004,572 )
 
                 
Total deposits
    (1,001,882 )     (2,690,505 )     (3,692,387 )
Short-term borrowings
    (113,930 )     (115,939 )     (229,869 )
Long-term borrowings
    (305,072 )     42,021       (263,051 )
 
                 
Total interest expense
    (1,420,884 )     (2,764,423 )     (4,185,307 )
 
                 
Net interest income
  $ (211,827 )     2,025,394       1,813,567  
 
                 
 
(1)   Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior year.
 
(2)   Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior year.
NOTE: The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
Provision for Possible Loan Losses
The provision for possible loan losses charged to earnings for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $7,692,000 and $2,250,000, respectively. Net charge-offs for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $7,196,485 and $2,359,775, respectively. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans was 2.96% and 1.15%, respectively. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (comprised of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and loans still accruing interest that were 90 days delinquent) was 42.55% and 36.24% at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The continued significant decline in the real estate market has resulted in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and a higher provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2010. See further discussion regarding the Company’s credit risk management in the section below entitled “Risk Management.”

19


Table of Contents

Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income for the first quarter of 2010, excluding security sale gains and losses, increased $55,122 (10.31%) to $589,891, from the $534,769 earned for the first quarter of 2009. Rental income generated from other real estate properties increased $66,759 (473.43%) to $80,860 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 from $14,101 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Offsetting this gain was a decline in secondary mortgage fees of $67,469 (60.98%) to $43,173 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 from $110,642 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, resulting from less mortgage refinance activity. Deposit service charge income increased by $16,838 (8.11%) to $224,476 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $207,638 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to a larger transaction deposit base.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $513,380 (7.09%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $7,754,512 from the $7,241,132 during the first quarter of 2009. Increased expenses relating to other real estate owned (including losses on sales of foreclosed property and writedowns on properties still held, as well as holding costs on such properties), and increased FDIC insurance assessments more than offset the cost savings achieved in other operational expenses such as personnel and occupancy expenses.
Other real estate expense increased to $1,373,787, which was an increase of $1,064,124 (343.64%) over the $309,663 incurred during the first quarter of 2009. The increase is due to higher levels of foreclosed assets and the continued decline in real estate values. Net losses and writedowns for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 were $774,301.
FDIC assessment expense increased $280,985 (55.80%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $784,518 from the $503,533 incurred during the first quarter of 2009, due to increased assessment rates on deposits.
Total personnel costs decreased $615,474 (15.86%) for the first quarter of 2010 to $3,264,982 from the $3,880,456 of personnel costs incurred for the first quarter of 2009. At the end of the first quarter of 2009, the Company implemented a plan to reduce operating costs, which included a reduction in staffing levels, and a reduction in certain benefits.
Total occupancy and equipment expenses decreased $38,912 (3.46%) to $1,087,020 for the first quarter of 2010 from the $1,125,932 incurred in the first quarter of 2009, as certain assets became fully depreciated and a temporary facility was closed.
Total data processing expenses for the first quarter of 2010 decreased $42,131 (8.88%) to $432,543 for the first quarter of 2010, as compared with the $474,674 of expenses incurred for the first quarter of 2009, due to cost reduction efforts.
Income Taxes
Applicable income tax benefits totaled $1,474,958 and $38,226 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were (37.12%) and (72.61%), respectively. The change in effective tax rates during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is a result of the level of tax-exempt interest income and its effect on the pre-tax income/loss.
Financial Condition
Total assets of the Company declined $51,692,713 (3.36%) in the first three months of 2010 to $1,485,014,871 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,536,707,584 at December 31, 2009. The depressed economy has reduced the Company’s opportunities for loan growth in its current markets.
Total deposits of the Company declined $53,377,655 (4.22%) in the first three months of 2010 to $1,212,682,542 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,266,060,197 at December 31, 2009. The Company has sought to lower its percentage of higher cost time deposit balances while increasing lower cost savings and interest bearing transaction account balances. The overall decline is consistent with the decline in total assets.

20


Table of Contents

Short-term borrowings at March 31, 2010 increased $7,080,039 (55.76%) to $19,776,971 from the level of $12,696,932 at December 31, 2009. Short-term borrowings will fluctuate significantly based on short-term liquidity needs and certain seasonal deposit trends. Longer-term borrowings declined $5,000,000 (4.81%) in the first three months of 2010 to $99,000,000 at March 31, 2010, form a level of $104,000,000. These longer-term fixed rate advances were used as an alternative funding source and are matched with longer-term fixed rate assets.
Total loans decreased $36,228,240 (3.18%) in the first three months of 2010 to $1,104,653,035 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $1,140,881,275 at December 31, 2009. The depressed economy has reduced the Company’s opportunities for loan growth in its current markets.
Investment securities, all of which are maintained as available-for-sale, decreased $45,407,247 (15.98%) in the first three months of 2010 to $238,712,309 at March 31, 2010, from the level of $284,119,556 at December 31, 2009. The Company’s investment portfolio growth is dependent upon the level of deposit growth and the funding requirements of the Company’s loan portfolio, as described above.
Total capital decreased $1,445,797 (0.97%) to $148,223,627 at March 31, 2010 from the level of $149,669,424 at December 31, 2009. The Company’s capital-to-asset percentage was 9.98% at March 31, 2010.
Recent Developments
The Company and the Banks have recently entered into a certain Agreement and memoranda of understanding (“MOU”) with regulatory authorities as listed below and discussed in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010. The Agreement and MOUs are informal administrative agreements pursuant to which the Company and the Banks have agreed to take various actions and comply with certain requirements to facilitate improvement in financial condition.
On November 30, 2009, Reliance Bank’s Board of Directors entered into an Agreement with the Missouri Division of Finance and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to, among other things, (a) develop a plan to reduce the level of risk in each criticized asset aggregating $2,000,000 or more included in the September 21, 2009 Missouri Division of Finance examination report; (b) maintain the reserve for possible loan losses at a level which is reasonable in relation to the degree of risk inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio; (c) develop and adopt policies and procedures designed to identify and monitor concentrations of credit, including out-of-territory loans and loan participations purchased; (d) formulate plans to reduce the Bank’s concentrations of credit, particularly in commercial real estate and land acquisition and development lending; (e) review and revise the Bank’s formal loan policy to address weaknesses noted in the September 21, 2009 Missouri Division of Finance examination report; (f) cease making or extending any loans which might violate the Bank’s written loan policy, except in those instances in which the Board of Directors has made a prior determination that a variance from loan policy is in the best interests of the Bank, with such Board decisions appropriately documented in the minutes of the Board of Director meetings; (g) develop a formal written profit plan, which will provide a three-year budget projection for asset growth and dividend payouts to ensure Tier 1 leverage capital is maintained at least a 7% level; and (h) maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 7%, and other capital ratios such that the Bank will remain well-capitalized, and not pay any dividends, management fees or bonuses, or increase any executive salary or other compensation that would reduce the Bank to a level below a well-capitalized status.
On February 10, 2010, Reliance Bank, FSB’s Board of Directors entered into a MOU with the Office of Thrift Supervision “OTS” to, among other things, (a) develop a business plan for the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012 which shall include (1) strategies to preserve and enhance the Bank’s capital sufficient to meet its needs and support its risk profile; (2) achieve core profitability by the end of 2010; and (3) establish and maintain Board-approved loan concentration limits expressed as a percentage of risk-based capital that takes into account the Bank’s current capital position, local and regional market conditions, and the credit risks posed by higher risk loans; (b) continue to take steps to identify, classify, and properly account for problem assets, including but not limited to: (1) conducting periodic asset quality reviews to identify and assign appropriate classifications to all problem assets; (2) performing analyses on all impaired assets identified by the review required by subparagraph (b)(1) above; and (3) estimating potential losses in identified problem assets, while establishing an appropriate reserve for loan losses for all classified assets; (c) develop a detailed, written plan with specific strategies, targets, and timeframes to reduce the Bank’s level of criticized assets; (d) review the adequacy of the Bank’s reserve for loan losses policies, procedures and methodologies on at least an annual basis to ensure the timely establishment and maintenance of an adequate reserve for loan losses account balance; (e) identify and monitor all loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings, with delinquent loans that are modified being classified as substandard and placed on nonaccrual status for at least six months; (f) prohibit the increase in the dollar amount of brokered deposits; (g) analyze the major differences in and bases for significant differences in the value of assets, liabilities, and

21


Table of Contents

off-balance-sheet positions calculated by the OTS Net Portfolio Value and the Bank’s internal economic value of equity model; and (h) correct all deficiencies and weaknesses identified in the October 5, 2009 OTS report of examination.
On March 16, 2010, the Company entered into a MOU with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (“Federal Reserve”) requiring the Company to, among other things, (a) utilize its financial and managerial resources to assist the Banks in addressing weaknesses identified during their most recent regulatory examinations, and achieving/maintaining compliance with any supervisory action between the Banks and their primary regulators; (b) declare no corporate dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve; (c) incur no additional debt without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve; and (d) make no distributions of interest or other sums on its preferred stock without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve.
The Agreement and MOUs will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the applicable regulatory authority. We do not expect the actions called for by the Agreement and MOUs to change our business strategy in any material respect, although they may have the effect of limiting or delaying our ability or plans to expand. Management has taken various actions to comply with the Agreement and MOUs and will diligently endeavor to take all actions necessary for compliance. Management believes that the Company and the Banks are currently in compliance with the Agreement and MOUs, although formal determination of compliance with the Agreement and MOUs can only be made by the applicable regulatory authority.

22


Table of Contents

The following tables show the condensed average balance sheets for the periods reported and the percentage of each principal category of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity to total assets. Also shown is the average yield on each category of interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on each category of interest-bearing liabilities for each of the periods reported.
                                 
    Quarter Ended March 31, 2010  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 1,125,419,848       74.53 %   $ 15,458,032       5.57 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    230,871,686       15.29 %     1,833,350       3.22 %
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    29,616,664       1.96 %     435,462       5.96 %
Short-term investments
    32,759,765       2.17 %     16,555       0.20 %
 
                       
Total earning assets
    1,418,667,963       93.95 %     17,743,399       5.07 %
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    4,923,591       0.33 %                
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (32,373,486 )     (2.14 )%                
Premises and equipment
    42,020,773       2.78 %                
Other assets
    75,688,483       5.00 %                
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    1,132,714       0.08 %                
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    91,392,075       6.05 %                
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 1,510,060,038       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 231,257,766       15.31 %     545,609       0.96 %
Savings
    318,459,696       21.09 %     1,024,281       1.30 %
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    270,925,947       17.94 %     1,640,112       2.46 %
Other time deposits
    352,455,081       23.34 %     2,580,587       2.97 %
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    1,173,098,490       77.68 %     5,790,589       2.00 %
Long-term borrowings
    103,462,366       6.85 %     968,919       3.80 %
Short-term borrowings
    13,783,129       0.91 %     30,419       0.90 %
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,290,343,985       85.44 %     6,789,927       2.13 %
 
                             
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    63,826,553       4.23 %                
Other liabilities
    5,268,643       0.36 %                
 
                           
Total liabilities
    1,359,439,181       90.03 %                
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    150,620,857       9.97 %                
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,510,060,038       100.00 %                
 
                         
Net interest income
                  $ 10,953,472          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            3.13 %
 
                             
(continued)

23


Table of Contents

                                 
    Quarter Ended March 31, 2009  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 1,245,164,434       77.45 %   $ 17,677,113       5.76 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    222,727,051       13.85 %     1,955,985       3.56 %
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    32,950,327       2.05 %     465,078       5.72 %
Short-term investments
    35,736,960       2.22 %     16,963       0.19 %
 
                       
Total earning assets
    1,536,578,772       95.57 %     20,115,139       5.31 %
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    5,117,201       0.32 %                
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (14,929,468 )     (0.93 )%                
Premises and equipment
    44,025,461       2.74 %                
Other assets
    37,297,792       2.32 %                
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    (396,148 )     (0.02 )%                
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    71,114,838       4.43 %                
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 1,607,693,610       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 160,063,425       9.96 %     595,238       1.51 %
Savings
    180,935,049       11.25 %     1,276,062       2.86 %
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    363,195,741       22.59 %     3,026,517       3.38 %
Other time deposits
    502,836,694       31.28 %     4,585,159       3.70 %
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    1,207,030,909       75.08 %     9,482,976       3.19 %
Long-term borrowings
    136,000,000       8.46 %     1,231,970       3.67 %
Short-term borrowings
    39,541,894       2.46 %     260,288       2.67 %
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,382,572,803       86.00 %     10,975,234       3.22 %
 
                             
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    57,886,059       3.60 %                
Other liabilities
    6,719,860       0.42 %                
 
                           
Total liabilities
    1,447,178,722       90.02 %                
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    160,514,888       9.98 %                
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,607,693,610       100.00 %                
 
                           
Net interest income
                  $ 9,139,905          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            2.41 %
 
                             
 
(1)   Interest includes loan fees, recorded as discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our annual report on Form 10-K, which was filed March 26, 2010.
 
(2)   Average balances include nonaccrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest, but is recognized only upon receipt.
 
(3)   Interest yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Nontaxable income has been adjusted upward by the amount of Federal income tax that would have been paid if the income had been taxed at a rate of 34%, adjusted downward by the disallowance of the interest cost to carry nontaxable loans and securities.
Risk Management
Management’s objective in structuring the balance sheet is to maximize the return on average assets while minimizing the associated risks. The major risks concerning the Company are credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. The following is a discussion concerning the Company’s management of these risks.

24


Table of Contents

Credit Risk Management
Managing risks that the Company’s banking subsidiaries assume in providing credit products to customers is extremely important. Credit risk management includes defining an acceptable level of risk and return, establishing appropriate policies and procedures to govern the credit process and maintaining a thorough portfolio review process.
Of equal importance in the credit risk management process are the ongoing monitoring procedures performed as part of the Company’s loan review process. Credit policies are examined and procedures reviewed for compliance each year. Loan personnel also continually monitor loans after disbursement in an attempt to recognize any deterioration which may occur so that appropriate corrective action can be initiated on a timely basis.
Net charge-offs for the first three months of 2010 were $7,196,485, compared to $2,359,775 for the first three months of 2009. The increased charge-off levels result from the increased levels of nonperforming loans and the decline in the overall valuation of real estate securing such loans. The Company’s banking subsidiaries had no loans to any foreign countries at March 31, 2010 and 2009, nor did they have any concentration of loans to any industry on these dates, although a significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by commercial and residential real estate in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. The Company has also refrained from financing speculative transactions such as highly leveraged corporate buyouts, or thinly-capitalized speculative start-up companies.
In the normal course of business, the Company’s practice is to consider and act upon borrowers’ requests for renewal of loans at their maturity. Evaluation of such requests includes a review of the borrower’s credit history, the collateral securing the loan, and the purpose of such requests. In general, loans which the Banks renew at maturity may require payment of accrued interest, a reduction in the loan balance, and/or the pledging of additional collateral and a potential adjustment of the interest rate to reflect changes in economic conditions.
The continued significant decline of the real estate markets in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas has caused an increase in the Company’s nonperforming assets. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, nonperforming loans totaled $76,896,651 and $39,168,715 respectively, comprised of nonaccrual loans of $65,837,410 and $37,228,499, respectively, and loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing interest of $1,998,599 and $1,940,216, respectively, and restructured loans totaling $9,060,642 at March 31, 2010. The increase in non-performing loans is due to the continued weakness in the economy, particularly regarding commercial and construction real estate in the Banks’ markets. The Company has recently taken a more aggressive approach toward collection and resolution of such problem credits. Such loans are continually reviewed for impairment as the underlying real estate values have declined, resulting in additional loan charge-offs. Once foreclosure occurs, additional declines in the value of the properties result in other real estate owned write-downs. The Company believes the reserve for loan losses calculation at March 31, 2010 adequately considers the current fair value of the underlying collateral on its problem loan portfolio; however, the values of these properties have continued to deteriorate, requiring the additional provision for loan losses. Additional provisions and other real estate write-downs may be required in subsequent quarters if the values of such properties continue to decline.

25


Table of Contents

Of the Company’s $1.1 billion of loans outstanding at March 31, 2010, 6.8% were originated in Florida and 93.2% outside of Florida. However, loans originated outside of Florida continue to account for a smaller portion of the nonperforming loans and assets of the Company compared to those loans originated in Florida, as the following table illustrates:
                         
    Originated In        
    Florida     All other     Total  
Net Charge-offs (quarter ended 3/31/2010)
  $ 2.1 million   $ 5.1 million   $ 7.2 million
Net Charge-offs (quarter ended 3/31/2009)
  $ 2.0 million   $ 0.4 million   $ 2.4 million
Nonperforming Loans (3/31/2010)
  $ 26.9 million   $ 50.0 million   $ 76.9 million
Nonperforming Loans (12/31/2009)
  $ 25.4 million   $ 46.7 million   $ 72.1 million
Nonperforming Loans (3/31/2009)
  $ 31.4 million   $ 7.8 million   $ 39.2 million
Nonperforming Assets* (3/31/2010)
  $ 46.5 million   $ 63.8 million   $ 110.3million
Nonperforming Assets* (12/31/2009)
  $ 44.5 million   $ 56.7 million   $ 101.2million
Nonperforming Assets* (3/31/2009)
  $ 39.3 million   $ 15.4 million   $ 54.7 million
Outstanding Loans Originated In
                       
Respective Markets (3/31/10)
  $ 75.2 million   $ 1.030 billion   $ 1.105 billion
Outstanding Loans Originated In
                       
Respective Markets (3/31/09)
  $ 120.0 million   $ 1.115 billion   $ 1.235 billion
 
*   Included in nonperforming assets are nonperforming loans and other real estate owned
Nonperforming loans are defined as loans on nonaccrual status, loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing, and restructured loans. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loans are well secured and in process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately, rather than delaying such action until the loans become 90 days past due. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal balance of the loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal for financial reporting purposes.
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are also included in nonperforming loans. Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are classified as such when the underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value is sufficient to cover principal and accrued interest) and are in the process of collection. Also included in nonperforming loans are “restructured” loans. Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest rate.
The continued significant decline of the real estate markets in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas has caused a significant increase in the Company’s nonperforming loans in 2009 and 2010. At March 31, 2010, nonperforming loans had increased $4,819,217 to $76,896,651, from $72,077,434 at December 31, 2009, the largest components of which were primarily comprised of the following loan relationships:
    A loan for approximately $1.4 million to an individual Florida investor that is in default and in the process of foreclosure prior to being suspended by a forbearance agreement. The loan is secured by an undeveloped real estate parcel in southwestern Florida.
 
    A loan for approximately $1.5 million to a single purpose entity controlled by a group of investors that is in default. The loan is secured by a building and improved commercial lots in Florida. The Company is negotiating with the borrower and guarantors to develop a plan for the property. Recent interest has been expressed by several potential lessees of the building.
 
    A loan for approximately $2.2 million to an individual, secured by the individual’s primary residence in Florida, that is in default. The borrower entered into a forbearance agreement but has now defaulted under that negotiated plan. Foreclosure proceedings have been initiated again.

26


Table of Contents

    A loan for approximately $1.4 million to a single purpose entity, secured by six improved commercial lots in Florida. The Company continues to negotiate with the borrower and guarantor to develop a marketing plan for the lots.
 
    A loan for approximately $2.0 million to a single purpose entity secured by unimproved property in Florida that is in default. The Company has been negotiating with the borrower and guarantor to determine the best course of action.
 
    Loans totaling approximately $2.0 million to entities controlled by a Florida real estate investor that were in default and for which foreclosure proceedings have commenced. Foreclosure is now moving forward uncontested based on an agreement reached among the Bank, borrowers and guarantors. These loans are secured by commercial real estate properties in southwestern Florida.
 
    A loan for approximately $1.4 million to an individual investor for future residential and commercial development. Development has not been started as planned. The loan is secured by approximately 240 acres of ground in Florida currently in agricultural production. The Company is in the process of foreclosure. Concurrent with the foreclosure, the Company has negotiated a sale of the note and mortgage to the junior lien holder.
 
    A loan for approximately $2.2 million to two Florida investors for future commercial development. Development has not started, as recent changes in FEMA flood maps have impacted the value and future development options. The borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement as it works through its options for the property, which now include action against Lee County, Florida for damages.
 
    A loan for approximately $1.4 million to a single purpose entity for commercial development, which has been delayed. The loan is secured by 3.4 acres of ground in Florida. The Company, borrower, and guarantors continue to negotiate a resolution to the delay in development.
 
    A loan for approximately $2.9 million for ground development of a proposed commercial retail strip center and self-storage facility in southwestern Florida. The entity was established by an experienced real estate developer; however, with the deterioration of the real estate market, the project did not begin construction, and the real estate downturn has affected the cash flow of the guarantor. The Company is working on obtaining a signed deed for the property in lieu of foreclosure.
 
    A loan for approximately $13.2 million to acquire a manufacturing/distribution center and to provide funding for a future addition to the facility. Due to the low current occupancy, the Company is in discussion with the borrower to determine the best plan of action.
 
    A loan for approximately $1.3 million to a corporation for the development of a commercial real estate parcel. The loan is secured by 6.2 acres of ground in Florida. The borrower and guarantor are negotiating with the Company and two other financial institutions to resolve all claims.
 
    A $4.5 million loan to a single purpose entity. The operation is a retail commercial center in St Charles, Missouri. Exterior construction of the building is complete; interior configuration continues and is dictated by tenant needs. The borrower continues to work to find new tenants to fill up unleased space. The borrower is currently working on getting three new potential tenants to move in. Also, the Company and borrower are working on collecting past due rents from a select few tenants.
 
    A loan for approximately $1.2 million to a Texas limited partnership. The loan is secured by a newly constructed retail commercial property in Dallas, Texas. The borrower has entered into bankruptcy protection. The Company is seeking a dismissal of the case in court so that it can foreclose on the property. Court hearings have occurred and will continue through the second quarter of 2010. The Company is still working through the legal issues with the bankruptcy and is waiting on the court’s decision.

27


Table of Contents

    A loan participation totaling approximately $2.5 million to entities controlled by a group of Missouri real estate investors for the purchase and development of a parcel of land in St. Charles, Missouri. The majority of the proposed entitlements and development have been completed. The loans are secured by the property. The lead bank reached an agreement with the borrower to move the project forward with a new home builder. The new builder has a good reputation and is qualified for the project, and has already completed five inventory homes. The Company and the builder are developing a marketing plan to increase sales prospects.
 
    A $17.2 million loan to a commercial real estate developer in Houston, Texas. The loan is secured by three office buildings and developed commercial land. The borrower recently refinanced a tract of land that provided a principal loan reduction, payment of past due interest and real estate taxes. Additionally, the borrower has another tract of ground that is bank collateral under contract to a national home builder. Home building and sales are expected to be positive for the overall development.
 
    A loan for approximately $4.0 million to a non-profit organization for the purchase of 482 acres and a 7,000 square foot residence in St. Louis, Missouri. The property is well located in a natural setting that abuts a river. The nonprofit organization has experienced financial setbacks, most notably a decline in contributions. Additional fund raising has started from “friends of conservation” for the purchase of the collateral.
 
    A loan of approximately $1.1 million, the proceeds of which were used for the purchase of a commercial real estate property that is located in Fairview Heights, Illinois. The building is occupied by a credit union under a long-term lease. The Company financed the purchase and improvements of the building.
The Company also has nonperforming assets in the form of other real estate owned. The Banks maintained other real estate owned totaling $33,451,884, $29,085,943 and $15,489,980 at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Other real estate owned represents property acquired through foreclosure, or deeded to the Banks in lieu of foreclosure for loans on which borrowers have defaulted on payment of principal and interest. The following table details the activity within other real estate owned since December 31, 2009:
         
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 29,085,943  
Foreclosures
    5,757,441  
Cash proceeds from sales
    (617,199 )
Losses and writedowns
    (774,301 )
 
     
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 33,451,884  
 
     
During this period of a declining real estate market, the Company has sought to add loans to its portfolio with increased collateral margins or excess payment capacity from proven borrowers to maintain the quality of the loan portfolio, and has often had to offer a competitively lower interest rate on such loans. Given the collateral values maintained on its loan portfolio, including the nonperforming loans discussed above, the Company believes the reserve for possible loan losses is adequate to absorb losses in the portfolio existing at March 31, 2010; however, should the real estate market continue to decline, the Company may require additional provisions to the reserve for possible loan losses to address the declining collateral values.
Potential Problem Loans
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had 30 loans with a total principal balance of $50,293,602 that were identified by management as having possible credit problems that raise doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the current repayment terms. These loans were continuing to accrue interest and were less than 90 days past due on any scheduled payments. However, various concerns, including, but not limited to, payment history, loan agreement compliance, adequacy of collateral coverage, and borrowers’ overall financial condition caused management to believe that these loans may result in reclassification at some future time as nonaccrual, past due or restructured. Such loans are not necessarily indicative of future nonaccrual loans, as the Company continues to work on resolving issues with both nonperforming and potential problem credits on its watch list.
The Company’s credit management policies and procedures focus on identifying, measuring, and controlling credit exposure. These procedures employ a lender-initiated system of rating credits, which is ratified in the loan approval process and subsequently tested in internal loan review and regulatory bank examinations. The system requires rating all loans at the time they are made, at each renewal date and as conditions warrant.

28


Table of Contents

Adversely rated credits, including loans requiring close monitoring, are included on a monthly loan watch list. Other loans are added whenever any adverse circumstances are detected which might affect the borrower’s ability to meet the terms of the loan. This could be initiated by any of the following:
    Delinquency of a scheduled loan payment;
 
    Deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition identified in a review of periodic financial statements;
 
    Decrease in the value of collateral securing the loan; or
 
    Change in the economic environment in which the borrower operates.
Loans on the watch list require periodic detailed loan status reports, including recommended corrective actions, prepared by the responsible loan officer, which are discussed at each monthly loan committee meeting.
Downgrades of loan risk ratings may be initiated by the responsible loan officer, internal loan review, the Watch List Committee, the Loan Committee, or senior lending personnel at any time. Upgrades of certain risk ratings may only be made with the concurrence of both the Chief Credit Officer and Chief Operating Officer.
The Company’s loan underwriting policies limit individual loan officers to specific amounts of lending authority, over which various committees must get involved and approve a credit. The Company’s underwriting policies require an analysis of a borrower’s ability to pay the loan and interest on a timely basis in accordance with the loan agreement. Collateral is then considered as a secondary source of payment, should the borrower not be able to pay.
The Company conducts weekly loan committee meetings with all of its loan officers, including the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. This committee may approve individual credit relationships up to $2,500,000. Larger credits must go to the Loan Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of three Directors on a rotating basis. The Company’s legal lending limit was $39,298,803 at March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the reserve for possible loan losses was $32,717,084 and $14,196,047, respectively, or 2.96% and 1.15% of net outstanding loans, respectively. The following table summarizes the Company’s loan loss experience for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The increase in the reserve is attributed to a number of factors, including the elevated levels of nonperforming loans and continued declines in the value of real estate securing the Banks’ loans. The economy continues to present challenges to our borrowers and it could be likely that others will meet with difficulty in meeting obligations.

29


Table of Contents

                 
    Three-Month Periods  
    Ended March 31,  
(in thousands of dollars)   2010     2009  
Average loans outstanding
  $ 1,125,420     $ 1,245,164  
 
           
Reserve at beginning of year
  $ 32,221     $ 14,306  
Provision for possible loan losses
    7,692       2,250  
 
           
 
    39,913       16,556  
 
           
 
               
Charge-offs:
               
Commercial loans:
               
Real estate
    (1,999 )     (409 )
Other
    (27 )     (28 )
Real estate:
               
Construction
    (4,962 )     (2,031 )
Residential
    (307 )     (250 )
Consumer
          (14 )
Overdrafts
           
 
           
Total charge-offs
    (7,295 )     (2,732 )
 
           
Recoveries:
               
Commercial loans:
               
Real estate
    36        
Other
    32        
Real estate:
               
Construction
    14       364  
Residential
    9       2  
Consumer
    8       6  
Overdrafts
           
 
           
Total recoveries
    99       372  
 
           
Reserve at end of period
  $ 32,717     $ 14,196  
 
           
Net charge-offs to average loans
    2.59 %     0.77 %
 
           
Ending reserve to net outstanding loans at end of period
    2.96 %     1.15 %
 
           
Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.
In determining the reserve and the related provision for loan losses, three principal elements are considered:
    Specific allocations based upon probable losses identified during a quarterly review of the loan portfolio;
    Allocations based principally on the Company’s risk rating formulas; and
    An unallocated allowance based on subjective factors.
The first element reflects management’s estimate of probable losses based upon a systematic review of specific loans considered to be impaired. These estimates are based upon collateral exposure, using the most current fair values of collateral.
The second element reflects the application of our loan rating system. This rating system is similar to those employed by state and Federal banking regulators. In addition, the analysis considers the following internal and external factors that may cause estimated losses to differ from historical loss experience. Those factors include (a) changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices; (b) changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments; (c) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; (d) changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff; (e) changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications; and (f) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations and the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the Banks’ current portfolio.
The unallocated allowance is based on management’s evaluation of conditions that are not directly reflected in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher

30


Table of Contents

degree of uncertainty because they may not be identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance include the following:
    General economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas;
 
    Credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions);
 
    Collateral values;
 
    Loan volumes and concentrations;
 
    Competitive factors resulting in shifts in underwriting criteria;
 
    Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments;
 
    Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio;
 
    Bank regulatory examination results; and
 
    Findings of our internal loan review department.
Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our entire lending staff. To the extent that any of these conditions are evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such conditions may be reflected as a specific reserve allocation applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions are not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the probable loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.
Based on this quantitative and qualitative analysis, provisions are made to the reserve for possible loan losses. Such provisions are reflected in our consolidated statements of income.
The allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses by loan category is a result of the above analysis. The allocation methodology applied by the Company, designed to assess the adequacy of the reserve for possible loan losses, focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, and historical losses normally experienced in our banking market for each portfolio category. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular loan category.
The total reserve for possible loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the portfolio. Management continues to target and maintain the reserve for possible loan losses equal to the allocation methodology plus an unallocated portion, as determined by economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the Company’s borrowers, as described above.
In determining an adequate balance in the reserve for possible loan losses, management places its emphasis as follows: evaluation of the loan portfolio with regard to potential future exposure on loans to specific customers and industries; reevaluation of each watch list loan or loan classified by supervisory authorities; and an overall review of the remaining portfolio in light of loan loss experience normally experienced in our banking market. Any problems or loss exposure estimated in these categories is provided for in the total current period reserve.
Management views the reserve for possible loan losses as being available for all potential or as yet presently unidentifiable loan losses which may occur in the future. The risk of future losses that is inherent in the loan portfolio is not precisely attributable to a particular loan or category of loans.
The perception of risk with respect to particular loans within the portfolio will change over time as a result of the characteristics and performance of those loans, overall economic and market trends, and the actual and expected trends in nonperforming loans. Consequently, while there are no specific allocations of the reserve resulting from economic or market conditions or actual or expected trends in nonperforming loans, these factors are considered in the initial assignment of risk ratings to loans, subsequent changes to those risk ratings and to a lesser extent in the size of any unallocated allowance amount.

31


Table of Contents

The unallocated portion of the reserve for loan losses is based on factors that cannot necessarily be associated with a specific loan or loan category. Management focuses on the following factors and conditions:
    There is a level of imprecision necessarily inherent in the estimates of expected loan losses, and the unallocated reserve gives reasonable assurance that this level of imprecision in our formula methodologies is adequately provided for.
    Pressures to maintain and grow the loan portfolio with increasing competition from de novo institutions and larger competitors have to some degree affected credit granting criteria adversely. The Company monitors the disposition of all credits, which have been approved through its Executive Loan Committee, in order to better understand competitive shifts in underwriting criteria.
While the Company has no significant specific industry concentration risk, analysis showed that over 91% of the loan portfolio was dependent on real estate collateral at March 31, 2010, including commercial real estate, residential real estate, and construction and land development loans. The following table details the significant categories of real estate loans as a percentage of total regulatory capital:
                         
    Real Estate Loan Balances as a Percentage  
    of Total Regulatory Capital  
    3/31/2010     12/31/2009     3/31/2009  
Construction, land development and other other land loans
    96 %     112 %     97 %
Nonfarm nonresidential:
                       
Owner occupied
    130 %     112 %     71 %
Non-owner occupied
    331 %     340 %     296 %
1-4 family closed end loans
    39 %     40 %     45 %
Multi-family
    85 %     86 %     61 %
Other
    22 %     22 %     19 %
The Company has policies, guidelines, and individual risk ratings in place to control this exposure at the transaction level; however, given the volatile nature of interest rates and their affect on the real estate market and the likely adverse impacts on borrowers’ debt service coverage ratios, management believes it is prudent to maintain an unallocated allowance component.
Additionally, the Company continues to be committed to a strategy of acquiring relationships with larger commercial and industrial companies. Management believes it is prudent to increase the percentage of the unallocated reserve to cover the risks inherent in the higher average loan size of these relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of the Banks’ ability to meet the borrowing needs and the deposit withdrawal requirements of their customers. The composition of assets and liabilities is actively managed to maintain the appropriate level of liquidity in the balance sheet. Management is guided by regularly-reviewed policies when determining the appropriate portion of total assets which should be comprised of readily-marketable assets available to meet conditions that are reasonably expected to occur.
Liquidity is primarily provided to the Banks through earning assets, including Federal funds sold and maturities and principal payments in the investment portfolio, all funded through continued deposit growth and short-term borrowings. Secondary sources of liquidity available to the Banks include the sale of securities included in the available-for-sale category (with a carrying value of $238,712,309 at March 31, 2010, of which approximately $169,103,313 is pledged to secure deposits and repurchase agreements) and borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the Federal Home Loan Banks. Maturing loans also provide liquidity on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, Bank management believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal requirements or increases in loan demand.
The Banks have borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the Federal Home Loan Banks of Des Moines and Atlanta. The Banks have Federal funds lines of credit totaling $23,000,000 through correspondent banks, of which $23,000,000 was available at March 31, 2010. Also, Reliance Bank has a credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines in the amount of $175,299,159 and availability under that line was $78,708,185 as of March 31, 2010. Reliance Bank, FSB maintained a credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta in the amount of $10,410,000, of which $6,310,000 was available at

32


Table of Contents

March 31, 2010. In addition, Reliance Bank maintained a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank in the amount of $33,573,652, all of which was available at March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, the combined availability under these arrangements totaled $141,591,837. Bank management believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal requirements or increases in loan demand. However, availability of the funds noted above is subject to the Banks’ maintaining a satisfactory rating by their regulators. If the Banks were to become increasingly distressed and the Banks’ ratings lowered, it could negatively impact the ability of the Banks to borrow the funds.
The Federal Reserve Board established risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies, which require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of “Tier 1 Capital” and “Total Capital.” Tier 1 Capital consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders’ equity and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and 50% of investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries. Total capital consists of, in addition to Tier 1 Capital, mandatory convertible debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 Capital, subordinated and other qualifying term debt and a portion of the reserve for possible loan losses, less the remaining 50% of qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated with reference to risk-weighted assets, which include both on-and off-balance sheet exposures to capital. The minimum required ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of Tier 1 Capital.
In addition, Federal Reserve guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to average total assets (net of goodwill) of 3%. The Federal Reserve guidelines state that all of these capital ratios constitute the minimum requirements for the most highly-rated banking organizations, and other banking organizations are expected to maintain capital at higher levels.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company and Banks were each in compliance with the Tier 1 Capital ratio requirement and all other applicable regulatory capital requirements, as calculated in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company, Reliance Bank, and Reliance Bank, FSB at March 31, 2010 are presented in the following table:
                                                 
                                    To Be a Well  
                                    Capitalized Bank Under  
            For Capital             Prompt Corrective  
    Actual     Adequacy Purposes             Action Provision  
(in thousands of dollars)   Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 142,998       11.47 %   $ 99,725       ³ 8.0 %     N/A       N/A  
Reliance Bank
    122,611       10.41 %     94,233       ³ 8.0 %   $ 117,791       ³ 10.0 %
Reliance Bank, FSB
    12,173       16.03 %     6,076       ³ 8.0 %     7,596       ³ 10.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 126,824       10.17 %   $ 49,862       ³ 4.0 %     N/A       N/A  
Reliance Bank
    107,746       9.15 %     47,116       ³ 4.0 %   $ 70,675       ³ 6.0 %
Reliance Bank, FSB
    11,186       14.73 %     3,038       ³ 4.0 %     4,557       ³ 6.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 126,824       8.52 %   $ 59,559       ³ 4.0 %     N/A       N/A  
Reliance Bank
    107,746       7.71 %     55,879       ³ 4.0 %   $ 69,849       ³ 5.0 %
Reliance Bank, FSB
    11,186       12.13 %     3,689       ³ 4.0 %     4,611       ³5.0 %
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized banking institutions. The extent of the regulators’ powers depend on whether the banking institution in question is “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” which are defined by the regulators as follows:
                         
    Total     Tier 1     Tier 2  
    Risk-Based     Risk-Based     Leverage  
    Ratio     Ratio     Ratio  
Well capitalized
    10 %     6 %     5 %
Adequately capitalized
    8       4       4  
Undercapitalized
    <8       <4       <4  
Significantly undercapitalized
    <6       <3       <3  
Critically undercapitalized
    *       *       *  
 
*   A critically undercapitalized institution is defined as having a tangible equity to total assets ratio of 2% or less.

33


Table of Contents

Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators’ corrective powers include: requiring the submission of a capital restoration plan; placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities; requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; restricting transactions with affiliates; restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits; ordering a new election of directors of the institution; requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and ultimately, appointing a receiver of the institution. The capital category of an institution also determines in part the amount of the premium assessed against the institution for FDIC insurance. At March 31, 2010, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB were considered “well capitalized” banks.
Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
Through the normal course of operations, the Banks have entered into certain contractual obligations and other commitments. Such obligations relate to funding of operations through deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for premises and equipment. As financial services providers, the Banks routinely enter into commitments to extend credit. While contractual obligations represent future cash requirements of the Banks, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes accorded to loans made by the Banks.
The required contractual obligations and other commitments at March 31, 2010 were as follows:
                                 
                    Over 1 Year        
    Total Cash     Less Than 1     Less Than 5     Over 5  
    Commitment     Year     Years     Years  
Operating leases
  $ 7,757,611     $ 716,022     $ 2,208,765     $ 4,832,824  
Time deposits
    593,445,592       402,076,716       183,074,140       8,294,736  
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
    99,000,000       6,000,000       26,000,000       67,000,000  
Commitments to extend credit
    117,792,139       60,375,663       25,712,325       31,704,151  
Standby letters of credit
    13,172,904       4,679,750       8,493,154        
Impact of New and Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
None
Part I – Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management of rate sensitive earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities remains a key to the Company’s profitability. The Company’s operations are subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations to the extent that there is a difference between the amount of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid or withdrawn, mature or are repriced in specified periods. The principal objective of the Company’s asset/liability management activities is to provide maximum levels of net interest income while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and facilitating the funding needs of the Company. The Banks utilize gap analyses as the primary quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk that is present at the end of each quarter. Reliance Bank management also monitors, on a quarterly basis the variability of earnings and fair value of equity in various interest rate environments. Bank management evaluates the Banks’ risk position to determine whether the level of exposure is significant enough to hedge a potential decline in earnings and value or whether the Banks can safely increase risk to enhance returns.

34


Table of Contents

The asset/liability management process, which involves structuring the balance sheet to allow approximately equal amounts of assets and liabilities to reprice at the same time, is a dynamic process essential to minimize the effect of fluctuating interest rates on net interest income. The following table reflects the Company’s interest rate gap (rate-sensitive assets minus rate-sensitive liabilities) analysis as of March 31, 2010, individually and cumulatively, through various time horizons:
                                         
    Remaining Maturity if Fixed Rate;  
    Earliest Possible Repricing Interval if Floating Rate  
            Over 3 months     Over 1 year              
    3 months     through     through              
    or less     12 months     5 years     Over 5 years     Total  
Interest-earning assets
                                       
Loans
  $ 441,805,666       135,471,944       490,330,237       37,045,188       1,104,653,035  
Investment securities, at amortized cost
    44,377,578       48,912,265       120,930,098       22,966,069       237,186,010  
Other interest-earnings assets
    43,486,792                         43,486,792  
 
                             
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 529,670,036       184,384,209       611,260,335       60,011,257       1,385,325,837  
 
                             
Interest bearing-liabilities
                                       
Savings and interest bearing transaction accounts
  $ 561,917,746       31,574                   561,949,320  
Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
    59,122,375       129,761,23       66,081,184       3,490,799       258,455,589  
All other time deposits
    63,616,380       149,576,730       116,992,956       4,803,937       334,990,003  
Nondeposit interest-bearing liabilities
    19,645,803       6,131,168       26,000,000       67,000,000       118,776,971  
 
                             
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  $ 704,302,304       285,500,703       209,074,140       75,294,736       1,274,171,883  
 
                             
Gap by period
  $ (174,632,268 )     (101,116,494 )     402,186,195       (15,283,479 )     111,153,954  
 
                             
Cumulative gap
  $ (174,632,268 )     (275,748,762 )     126,437,433       111,153,954       111,153,954  
 
                             
Ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest- sensitive liabilities
    0.75x       0.65x       2.92x       0.80x       1.09x  
 
                             
Cumulative ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest-sensitive liabilities
    0.75x       0.72x       1.11x       1.09x       1.09x  
 
                             
A gap report is used by Bank management to review any significant mismatch between the repricing points of the Banks’ rate sensitive assets and liabilities in certain time horizons. A negative gap indicates that more liabilities reprice in that particular time frame and, if rates rise, these liabilities will reprice faster than the assets. A positive gap would indicate the opposite. Management has set policy limits specifying acceptable levels of interest rate risk as measured by the gap report. Gap reports can be misleading in that they capture only the repricing timing within the balance sheet, and fail to capture other significant risks such as basis risk and embedded options risk. Basis risk involves the potential for the spread relationship between rates to change under different rate environments and embedded options risk relates to the potential for the alteration of the level and/or timing of cash flows given changes in rates. As indicated in the above table, the Company operates on a short-term basis similar to most other financial institutions, as its liabilities, with savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts included, could reprice more quickly than its assets. However, the process of asset/liability management in a financial institution is dynamic. Bank management believes its current asset/liability management program will allow adequate reaction time for trends in the marketplace as they occur, allowing maintenance of adequate net interest margins.
Bank management also uses fair market value of equity analyses to help identify longer-term risk that may reside on the current balance sheet. The fair market value of equity is represented by the present value of all future income streams generated by the current balance sheet. The Company measures the fair market value of equity as the net present value of all asset and liability cash flows discounted at forward rates suggested by the current Treasury curve plus appropriate credit spreads. This representation of the change in the fair market value of equity under different rate scenarios gives insight into the magnitude of risk to future earnings due to rate changes. Management has set policy limits relating to declines in the market value of equity. The results of these analyses at March 31, 2010 indicate that the Company’s fair market value of equity would decrease 1.5% and 1.7% from an immediate and sustained parallel decrease in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points, respectively, and increase 2.6% from a corresponding increase in interest rates of either 100 or 200 basis points.
Part I — Item 4T — Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)).
As a result of material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to net losses available to common shareholders after increasing the net loss for preferred dividends paid by the Company, which require an adjustment to the previously reported net loss per share data reported by the Company, our management has reassessed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2010.
On March 4, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as interim financial statements in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ending March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2010, did not properly account for certain items referred to in the preceding paragraph and, as a result, should not be relied upon. The Audit Committee has authorized and directed the officers of the Company to restate its audited financial statements and interim quarterly financial statements included in the above referenced filing as of and for the periods covered by such filings.
The Company has implemented certain changes in our internal controls as of the date of this report to address the material weaknesses and believes that such weaknesses have been remediated.

35


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Part II — Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Part II — Item 1A — Risk Factors
There have not been any material changes in the risk factors as disclosed in the Company’s annual report in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Part II — Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company sold 80 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, no par value, Series C, at the offering price of $1,000 per share for the period ended on March 31, 2010. The offering was extended to existing shareholders who are accredited investors (as such term is defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and to other accredited investors to subscribe for and purchase shares of this series, and was intended to qualify for exemption from registration pursuant to Regulation D. The purpose of the Offering, which is still active, is to generate capital, as well as to remain well capitalized.
Part II — Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Part II — Item 4 — [Removed and Reserved]
Part II — Item 5 — Other Information
(a) None.
(b) There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors implemented during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Part II — Item 6 — Exhibits
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
31.1
  Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

36


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
32.1
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
 
 
  By:   /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IV    
    Allan D. Ivie, IV  
    Chief Executive Officer   
 
     
  By:   /s/ Dale E. Oberkfell    
    Dale E. Oberkfell   
    Chief Financial Officer   
 
Date: March 16, 2011

37