CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-K - EX-13 - EXHIBIT 13

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP	ex32.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP	ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP	ex31-2.htm
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP	ex23-1.htm
10-K - FORM 10-K - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP	t69956a_10k.htm

Exhibit 13

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS


	2010 Annual Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page


President’s Letter to Shareholders and Customers	1

Business of Cheviot Financial Corp.	2

Financial Highlights	3

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	5

Financial Statements:
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	26
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	27
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition	28
Consolidated Statements of Earnings	29
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	30
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	31
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	32-33
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	34

Directors and Officers	69

Investor and Corporate Information	70

Office Locations	71

LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

To Our Shareholders and Customers:

We are pleased to present the Annual Report to Shareholders of Cheviot Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”), the holding company which owns 100% of the outstanding stock of Cheviot Savings Bank (the “Bank”). This is the seventh annual report to reflect the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of the Corporation and Bank. During 2010 we entered into an agreement to acquire First Franklin Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Franklin Savings and Loan Company. We believe this acquisition will significantly enhance the Cheviot Savings Bank franchise and provide our customers with a broader array of services and products. We welcome the First Franklin customers to Cheviot Savings. We look forward to completing the acquisition during the first quarter of 2011.

During a difficult year for the national and local economy, the Corporation had net earnings of $2.0 million during 2010 and ended the year with assets of $358.1 million.

On February 15, 2011 Cheviot Financial Corp. declared its dividend of $0.12 per share to stockholders of record March 15, 2011. The dividend will be paid March 31, 2011. This is the seventh consecutive year that Cheviot Financial Corp. has increased its dividend.

In a period of time when companies have reduced or eliminated dividends, Cheviot Financial Corp. has had the ability to sustain and increase its dividend to shareholders.

2011 will be an exciting year for Cheviot Savings Bank. Upon completion of the purchase of Franklin Savings and Loan, the footprint of Cheviot Savings Bank will double to 12 branches. This will give the Company a presence in new markets to enhance growth and opportunity.

Cheviot Savings Bank continues to help the community through involvement and participation in various community organizations and groups.

The Cheviot Savings Bank Charitable Foundation has demonstrated their support in the community through various contributions. Through 2010, the Foundation has donated over $629,000 to various charities and organizations.

I want to personally thank you for your support as a shareholder and pledge to continue to advance the interests of the Corporation, the Bank, the community, our customers and shareholders.

	Sincerely,

	Cheviot Financial Corp.

	By	/s/ Thomas J. Linneman
		Thomas J. Linneman
		President and Chief Executive Officer

-1-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

BUSINESS OF CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

Cheviot Savings Bank (the “Savings Bank”) was established in 1911 as an Ohio chartered mutual savings and loan association. As an Ohio-chartered savings association, the Savings Bank is subject to the regulation and supervision of the Ohio Department of Financial Institutions and the Office of Thrift Supervision.

In 2004, the Savings Bank reorganized into a two-tier mutual holding company structure (the “Reorganization”) and established Cheviot Financial Corp. (“Cheviot Financial” or the “Corporation”) as the parent of the Savings Bank. Pursuant to the Plan, Cheviot Financial issued 9,918,751 common shares, of which approximately 55.0% was issued to Cheviot Mutual Holding Company, a federally chartered mutual holding company. Cheviot Financial sold 4,388,438 common shares, representing approximately 44.0% of the outstanding common stock, to the Savings Bank’s depositors and a newly formed Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) at an initial issuance price of $10.00 per share. In addition, 75,000 shares, or approximately one percent of the outstanding shares, were issued to a charitable foundation established by the Savings Bank. Cheviot Financial’s issuance of common shares resulted in proceeds, net of offering costs and shares issued to the ESOP, totaling $39.3 million. At December 31, 2010, Cheviot Financial had 3,409,595 shares issued and outstanding to persons other than Cheviot Mutual Holding Company.

The Savings Bank is a community and customer-oriented savings and loan operating six full-service offices, all of which are located in Hamilton County, Ohio, which we consider our primary market area. We emphasize personal service and customer convenience in serving the financial needs of the individuals, families and businesses residing in our markets.

Cheviot Financial’s executive offices are located at 3723 Glenmore Avenue, Cheviot, Ohio 45211-4744, and our telephone number is (513) 661-0457.

The following are highlights of Cheviot Savings Bank’s operations:

●

a 99-year history of providing financial products and services to individuals, families and small business customers in southwestern Ohio;

●

a commitment to single family residential mortgage lending;

●

maintaining capital strength and exceeding regulatory “well capitalized” capital requirements; and

●

a business strategy designed to expand our banking relationships with existing and future customers.

-2-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following tables set forth selected financial and other data of Cheviot Financial Corp. at the dates and for the periods presented.


	At December 31,
	2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
	(In thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	358,069	$	341,860	$	332,000	$	319,060	$	309,780
Cash and cash equivalents		18,149		11,283		10,013		9,450		5,490
Investment securities available for sale		88,382		55,851		23,909		12,178		9,085
Investment securities held to maturity – at cost		-		-		7,000		23,000		25,099
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		4,279		4,920		648		814		1,042
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity – at cost		4,779		5,744		6,915		9,500		14,237
Loans receivable, net (1)		225,438		247,002		268,483		249,832		241,178
Deposits		257,852		235,904		216,048		219,526		205,450
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		27,300		33,672		44,604		28,665		29,236
Shareholders’ equity		69,419		68,750		68,231		67,920		72,200

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Selected Operating Data:
Total interest income	$	15,438	$	16,473	$	18,058	$	17,791	$	16,509
Total interest expense		4,698		6,585		8,445		9,499		7,782
Net interest income		10,740		9,888		9,613		8,292		8,727
Provision for losses on loans		550		853		668		116		25
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		10,190		9,035		8,945		8,176		8,702
Total other income		1,323		813		503		545		538
Total general, administrative and other expense		8,540		8,141		7,440		7,367		6,770
Earnings before income taxes		2,973		1,707		2,008		1,354		2,470
Federal income taxes		995		606		592		428		774
Net earnings	$	1,978	$	1,101	$	1,416	$	926	$	1,696

Earnings per share – basic and diluted	$	0.23	$	0.13	$	0.16	$	0.10	$	0.18

(1) Includes loans held for sale, net of allowance for loan losses and deferred loan costs.

-3-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA (CONTINUED)

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006

Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:(1)
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		0.56	%		0.32	%		0.43	%		0.29	%		0.56	%
Return on average equity		2.82			1.60			2.09			1.33			2.32
Average equity to average assets		19.99			20.26			20.75			22.16			24.21
Equity to total assets at end of period		19.39			20.11			20.55			21.29			23.31
Interest rate spread (2)		3.04			2.67			2.49			2.00			2.27
Net interest margin (2)		3.33			3.10			3.11			2.78			3.03
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		119.68			120.80			122.59			124.51			128.42
Total general, administrative and other expenses to average total assets		2.43			2.40			2.28			2.34			2.24
Efficiency ratio (3)		70.79			76.08			73.55			83.37			73.07
Dividend payout ratio		191.30			307.69			225.00			320.00			155.56
Asset Quality Ratios:
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans (4)		2.15			0.99			0.69			0.26			0.12
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets (4)		1.93			1.31			0.88			0.40			0.09
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans		0.55			0.41			0.26			0.24			0.35
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
nonperforming assets		18.10			22.82			24.36			46.39			296.44
Regulatory Capital Ratios:
Tangible capital		16.24			16.24			16.84			16.75			16.60
Core capital		16.24			16.24			16.84			16.75			16.60
Risk-based capital		34.92			32.39			32.53			32.67			33.29
Number of:
Banking offices		6			6			6			6			6

(1)	With the exception of end of period ratios, all ratios are based on average monthly balances during the periods.

(2)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(3)	Efficiency ratio represents the ratio of general, administrative and other expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and total other income.

(4)	Nonperforming loans consist of non-accrual loans and accruing loans greater than 90 days delinquent, while nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure.

-4-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis reflects Cheviot Financial’s financial statements and other relevant statistical data and is intended to enhance your understanding of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with Cheviot Financial’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Annual Report. The preparation of financial statements involves the application of accounting policies relevant to the business of Cheviot Financial. Certain of Cheviot Financial’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of Cheviot Financial’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers.

General

Our results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on our loans and securities and our cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by the provision for losses on loans, loan sales and servicing activities, and service charges and fees collected on our loan and deposit accounts. Our general, administrative and other expense primarily consists of employee compensation and benefits, advertising expense, data processing expense, other operating expenses, FDIC expense, and federal income taxes. Results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

Recent Developments

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the financial regulatory reform act entitled the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” that implements changes to the regulation of the financial services industry, including provisions that, among other things:

	o	Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws.
	o	Apply the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions to bank holding companies.
	o	Require the FDIC to seek to make its capital requirements for banks countercyclical so that the amount of capital required to be maintained increases in times of economic expansion and decreases in times of economic contraction.
	o	Change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible capital.
	o	Implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders that apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions.
	o	Make permanent the $250 thousand limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100 thousand to $250 thousand, and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013, for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions.
	o	Repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts.
	o	Increase the authority of the Federal Reserve to examine the Company and its non-bank subsidiaries.

-5-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Recent Developments (continued)

Cheviot Financial would become a bank holding company subject to regulation and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Savings Bank will be regulated by the FDIC, in each case, instead of the Office of Thrift Supervision. As a bank holding company, Cheviot Financial may become subject to regulatory capital requirements it is not currently subject to as a savings and loan holding company and certain additional restrictions on its activities. In addition, compliance with new regulations and being supervised by one or more new regulatory agencies could increase our expenses.

Many aspects of the act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on the Corporation, its customers or the financial industry. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance assessments and payment of interest on demand deposits could increase the costs associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may generate.

On October 12, 2010, the Corporation, its wholly owned subsidiary, the Savings Bank, and Cheviot Merger Subsidiary, Inc. (“Merger Subsidiary”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with First Franklin Corporation (“First Franklin”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Franklin Savings and Loan Company (“Franklin Savings”).

The Merger Agreement provides for a business combination whereby Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into First Franklin (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger Subsidiary will cease and First Franklin will continue as the surviving corporation in the Merger. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of First Franklin (other than shares owned by First Franklin, the Corporation, Savings Bank and Merger Subsidiary) will be converted into the right to receive $14.50 in cash. Each First Franklin stock option outstanding at the time of the closing will be converted into an amount of cash equal to the positive difference, if any, between $14.50 and the exercise price of such stock option.

On January 31, 2011, the stockholders of First Franklin approved the Merger. The acquisition is expected is expected to close on or about March 16, 2011. The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Corporation, Savings Bank, Merger Subsidiary, First Franklin and Franklin Savings.

First Franklin and Franklin Savings have generally agreed not to solicit proposals relating to, or enter into discussions concerning, alternative mergers, consolidations, acquisitions or other business combination transactions.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Corporation and First Franklin, including allowing First Franklin to terminate the Merger Agreement if First Franklin has received an acquisition proposal that First Franklin’s board of directors reasonably determines to be superior to the Merger from a financial point-of-view to First Franklin’s stockholders. Further, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, First Franklin may be required to pay the Corporation a termination fee of $980,000.

As a result of the acquisition we anticipate that components of our non-interest expense will increase as we integrate the personnel and operations of First Franklin. We believe however that these costs will more than be offset by the synergies which can be expected from a larger financial institution and the enhanced profitability potential we will have operating as an institution with over $500 million in assets.

-6-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the accounting method used for the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy.

The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover inherent, but unconfirmed, credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for losses on loans which is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management makes significant estimates and has identified this policy as one of the most critical accounting policies for Cheviot Financial.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the allowance for loan losses. Consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

The analysis has two components, specific and general allocations. Specific percentage allocations can be made for unconfirmed losses related to loans that are determined to be impaired. Impairment is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. If the fair value of the loan is less than the loan’s carrying value, a charge-off is recorded for the difference. The general allocation is determined by segregating the remaining loans by type of loan, risk weighting (if applicable) and payment history. We also analyze historical loss experience, delinquency trends, general economic conditions and geographic and industry concentrations. This analysis establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of the general reserve. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowances we have established which could result in a material negative effect on our financial results.

We classify our investments in debt and equity securities as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Securities classified as held-to maturity are recorded at cost or amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. We obtain our fair values from a third party service. This service’s fair value calculations are based on quoted market prices when such prices are available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimates of fair value are computed using a variety of techniques, including extrapolation from the quoted prices of similar instruments or recent trades for thinly traded securities, fundamental analysis, or through obtaining purchase quotes. Due to the subjective nature of the valuation process, it is possible that the actual fair values of these investments could differ from the estimated amounts, thereby affecting our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. If the estimated value of investments is less than the cost or amortized cost, we evaluate whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. If such an event or change has occurred and we determine that the impairment is other-than-temporary, we expense the impairment of the investment in the period in which the event or change occurred. We also consider how long a security has been in a loss position in determining if it is other than temporarily impaired. Management also assesses the nature of the unrealized losses taking into consideration factors such as changes in risk –free interest rates, general credit spread widening, market supply and demand, creditworthiness of the issuer, and quality of the underlying collateral.

-7-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of such words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include:

●

statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

●

statements regarding our business plans and prospects and growth and operating strategies;

●

statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

●

estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including, among other things, the following important factors that could affect the actual outcome of future events:

●

significantly increased competition among depository and other financial institutions;

●

inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments;

●

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, which are worse than expected;

●

adverse changes in the securities markets;

●

legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business;

●

our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

●

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

●

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and

●

changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans.

Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements.

-8-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

AVERAGE BALANCES, NET INTEREST INCOME AND YIELDS EARNED AND RATES PAID

Net interest income represents the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income also depends on the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rate earned or paid on them, respectively.

The following tables set forth certain information for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. For the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, is expressed both in dollars and rates. No tax equivalent adjustments were deemed necessary based on materiality. Average balances are based on monthly averages. In the opinion of management, monthly averages do not differ materially from daily averages.


	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010							2009							2008
	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net (1)	$	240,224	$	13,285		5.53	%	$	253,302	$	14,643		5.78	%	$	260,708	$	15,436		5.92	%
Mortgage-backed securities		9,871		289		2.93			11,080		437		3.94			8,505		464		5.46
Investment securities		67,633		1,714		2.53			42,562		1,197		2.81			35,488		2,074		5.84
Interest-earning deposits and other (2)		5,237		150		2.86			12,103		196		1.62			4,507		84		1.86
Total interest-earning assets		322,965		15,438		4.78			319,047		16,473		5.16			309,208		18,058		5.84

Total non-interest-earning assets		28,312							19,786							17,289

Total assets	$	351,277						$	338,833						$	326,497

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	236,704		3,435		1.45		$	224,324		4,844		2.16		$	212,963		6,727		3.16
FHLB advances		33,152		1,263		3.81			39,783		1,741		4.38			39,257		1,718		4.38
Total interest-bearing liabilities		269,856		4,698		1.74			264,107		6,585		2.49			252,220		8,445		3.35

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities		11,208							6,069							6,535

Total liabilities		281,064							270,176							258,755

Shareholders’ equity		70,213							68,657							67,742

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	351,277						$	338,833						$	326,497

Net interest income			$	10,740						$	9,888						$	9,613

Interest rate spread (3)						3.04	%						2.67	%						2.49	%

Net interest margin (4)						3.33	%						3.10	%						3.11	%

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						119.68	%						120.80	%						122.59	%

(1)	Includes nonaccruing loans. Interest income on loans receivable, net includes amortized loan origination fees.
(2)	Includes interest-earning demand deposits, other interest-earning deposits and FHLB stock.
(3)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate on interest-bearing liabilities.
(4)	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

-9-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) the net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.


	Year ended December 31,
	2010 vs. 2009									2009 vs. 2008
	Increase (decrease) due to									Increase (decrease) due to
	Volume			Rate			Net Change			Volume			Rate			Net Change
	(In thousands)
Interest-earnings assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	(739	)	$	(619	)	$	(1,358	)	$	(434	)	$	(359	)	$	(793	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(44	)		(104	)		(148	)		120			(147	)		(27	)
Investment securities		645			(128	)		517			354			(1,231	)		(877	)
Interest-earning assets		(147	)		101			(46	)		124			(12	)		112

Total interest-earning assets		(285	)		(750	)		(1,035	)		164			(1,749	)		(1,585	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits		255			(1,664	)		(1,409	)		343			(2,226	)		(1,883	)
FHLB advances		(268	)		(210	)		(478	)		23			-			23
Total interest-bearing liabilities		(13	)		(1,874	)		(1,887	)		366			(2,226	)		(1,860	)

Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	(272	)	$	1,124		$	852		$	(202	)	$	477		$	275

-10-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

At December 31, 2010, Cheviot Financial had total assets of $358.1 million, an increase of $16.2 million, or 4.7%, from $341.9 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in total assets reflects an increase in investment securities totaling $32.5 million and an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $6.9 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in loans receivable of $21.6 million.

Cash, federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions totaled $18.1 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $6.9 million, or 60.9%, from $11.3 million at December 31, 2009. Investment securities totaled $88.4 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $32.5 million, or 58.2%, from $55.9 million at December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, investment securities purchases consisted of $118.7 million of U.S. Government agency obligations, which were partially offset by $85.1 million of maturities. At December 31, 2010, all of our investment securities were classified as available for sale. As of December 31, 2010, none of the investment securities are considered impaired.

Mortgage-backed securities totaled $9.1 million at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 15.1%, from $10.7 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in mortgage-backed securities was due to $1.7 million of principal repayments. At December 31, 2010, $4.8 million of mortgage-backed securities were classified as held to maturity, while $4.3 million were classified as available for sale. As of December 31, 2010, none of the mortgage-backed securities are considered impaired.

Loans receivable, including loans held for sale, totaled $225.4 million at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $21.6 million, or 8.7%, from $247.0 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease resulted from loan repayments of $58.6 million and loans sales of $29.7 million, which were partially offset by loan originations of $34.0 million. The change in the composition of the Corporation’s assets reflects management’s decision to take advantage of opportunities to obtain a higher rate of return by selling certain mortgage loans and recording gains, as well as lower levels of one-to-four-family loans and multi-family loan originations. Cheviot Savings Bank will sell selected one- to four-family residential fixed-rate loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. Loans sold and serviced totaled $44.6 million at December 31, 2010. There were approximately $4.4 million of loans held for sale in our loan portfolio at December 31, 2010.

At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses totaled $1.2 million, or 0.55% of net loans, compared to $1.0 million, or 0.41% of net loans at December 31, 2009. In determining the appropriate level of our allowance for loan losses at any point in time, management and the board of directors apply a systematic process focusing on the risk of loss in the portfolio. First, the loan portfolio is segregated by loan types to be evaluated collectively and loan types to be evaluated individually. Delinquent multi-family and commercial loans are evaluated individually for potential impairments in their carrying value. Second, the allowance for loan losses entails utilizing our three year historic loss experience by applying such loss percentage to the loan types to be collectively evaluated in the portfolio. The $550,000 provision for losses on loans during the year ended December 31, 2010 is a reflection of the following factors: weak economic conditions in the greater Cincinnati area, loan charge-offs of $155,000 and the need to allocate approximately $178,000 in specific reserves for seven properties with principal balances totaling $617,000 which were acquired through foreclosure. The analysis of the allowance for loan losses requires an element of judgment and is subject to the possibility that the allowance may need to be increased, with a corresponding reduction in earnings. To the best of management’s knowledge, all known and inherent losses that are probable and that can be reasonably estimated have been recorded at December 31, 2010.

-11-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (continued)

Nonperforming and impaired loans totaled $4.9 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $2.4 million at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, nonperforming and impaired loans were comprised of forty-seven loans secured by one-to-four family residential real estate and one loan secured by land. At both December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, real estate acquired through foreclosure totaled $2.0 million, respectively. The Corporation has an allowance for loan losses intended to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled 25.6% and 41.9% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Based on individual analyses of these loans, management believes that the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses conforms to generally accepted accounting principles based upon the available facts and circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that additions to the allowance will not be necessary in future periods, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Deposits totaled $257.9 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $21.9 million, or 9.3%, from $235.9 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in deposits consisted of a $22.2 million increase in demand transaction and passbook accounts offset by a decrease in certificates of deposits of $213,000.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati decreased by $6.4 million, or 18.9%, to a total of $27.3 million at December 31, 2010. During 2010, FHLB advances were not used as a funding source for loan originations as the Corporation sold more loans to the FHLB.

Shareholders’ equity totaled $69.4 million at December 31, 2010, a $669,000, or 1.0%, increase from December 31, 2009. The increase in shareholders’ equity resulted primarily from net earnings of $2.0 million and an increase in shares acquired by stock benefit plans of $767,000, which was partially offset the payment of dividends of $1.4 million paid during 2010. At December 31, 2010, Cheviot Financial had the ability to purchase an additional 360,818 shares under its announced stock repurchase plan.

Cheviot Savings Bank is required to maintain minimum regulatory capital pursuant to federal regulations. At December 31, 2010, Cheviot Savings Bank’s regulatory capital substantially exceeded all minimum regulatory capital requirements.

-12-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

General

Cheviot Financial’s net earnings totaled $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $877,000, or 79.7%, compared to the net earnings recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in net earnings reflects an $852,000 increase in net interest income, a $303,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses and an increase of $510,000 in other income, which was partially offset by a $399,000 increase in general, administrative and other expenses and a $389,000 increase in the provision for federal income taxes.

Interest Income

Total interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, totaled $15.4 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 6.3%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in interest income reflects the impact of a 38 basis point decrease in the average yield to 4.78% from 5.16%, which was partially offset by a $3.9 million increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

Interest income on loans decreased by $1.4 million, or 9.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in interest income on loans reflects a $13.1 million, or 5.2%, decrease in the average balance outstanding during 2010 and a decrease of 25 basis points in the average yield to 5.53%. Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased by $148,000, or 33.9%, during the year ended December 31, 2010, due primarily to a decrease in the average yield of 101 basis points from 2009 and a decrease in the average balance outstanding of $1.2 million.

Interest income on investment securities increased by $517,000, or 43.2%, during the year ended December 31, 2010, due to an increase of $25.1 million, or 58.9%, increase in the average balance outstanding which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield of 28 basis points from 2009. Interest income on other interest-earning assets decreased by $46,000, or 23.5%, during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was due to a $6.9 million decrease in the average balance outstanding, which was partially offset by a 124 basis point increase in the average yield.

-13-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (continued)

Interest Expense

Interest expense totaled $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 28.7%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities outstanding increased by $5.7 million during 2010, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average cost of liabilities of 75 basis points to 1.74% for the year ended December 31, 2010. Interest expense on deposits totaled $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 29.1%, from the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease was a result of a decrease of 71 basis points in the average cost of deposits to 1.45% for 2010, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding of $12.4 million, or 5.5%, for 2010. Interest expense on borrowings totaled $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $478,000, or 27.5%, from the 2009 period. This decrease resulted from a decrease in the average balance of borrowings outstanding of $6.6 million, or 16.7% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in the average cost of deposits and borrowings reflects lower short term interest rates in 2010 as compared to 2009, as actions by the Federal Reserve to reduce short term interest rates resulted in a steepening of the yield curve and a reduction of short term and medium term interest rates.

Net Interest Income

As a result of the foregoing changes in interest income and interest expense, net interest income increased by $852,000, or 8.6%, during the year ended December 31, 2010 from the year ended December 31, 2009. The Savings Bank’s cost of its liabilities decreased more significantly than the yield on its assets during 2010. The average interest rate spread increased to 3.04% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 2.67% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The net interest margin increased to 3.33% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 3.10% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

-14-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (continued)

Provision for Losses on Loans

As a result of an analysis of historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Savings Bank, the status of past due principal and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the Savings Bank’s market area, and other factors related to the collectability of the Savings Bank’s loan portfolio, management recorded a $550,000 provision for losses on loans for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management’s analysis of the allowance resulted in an $853,000 provision for losses on loans for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decision to make a smaller provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to recent periods, reflects the amount necessary to maintain an adequate allowance based on historical loss experience, changes in the local economy, and other external factors. These other external factors, economic conditions, increase in delinquent loans, and collateral value changes, have had a negative impact on non-owner occupied loans in the portfolio. There can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on nonperforming loans in the future. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses totaled $1.2 million, or 0.55% of net loans, compared to $1.0 million, or 0.41% of net loans at December 31, 2009. Management believes all nonperforming loans are adequately collateralized; however, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be adequate to absorb losses on known nonperforming loans or that the allowance will be adequate to cover losses on nonperforming loans in the future.

Other Income

Other income totaled $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $510,000, or 62.7%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase is due primarily to an increase in the gain on sale of loans of $308,000, an increase in other operating income of $110,000 and by a decrease in loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure of $79,000.

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense totaled $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $399,000, or 4.9%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase is a result of a $447,000, or 100.7% increase in legal and professional expense and an increase of $92,000, or 16.1% in occupancy and equipment expense, which was partially offset by a $115,000, or 2.5% decrease in employee compensation and benefits. The increase in legal and professional expenses reflects the additional costs associated with entering into the agreement to acquire First Franklin Corporation and prepare the necessary regulatory applications associated with the transaction. The increase in occupancy and equipment is the result of annual maintenance contracts for the new equipment instituted for the new core computer operating system. The decrease in employee compensation and benefits is a result of the expense vesting period expiring on prior stock-based compensation grants.

-15-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (continued)

FDIC Premiums

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) imposes an assessment against institutions for deposit insurance. This assessment is based on the risk category of the institution and currently ranges from 5 to 43 basis points of the institution’s deposits. Federal law requires that the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund be established by the FDIC at 1.15% to 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. If this reserve ratio drops below 1.15% or the FDIC expects that it to do so within six months, the FDIC must, within 90 days, establish and implement a plan to restore the designated reserve ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits within five years (absent extraordinary circumstances).

These actions increased our FDIC insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $291,000 from $248,000 for the same period in 2009.

Federal Income Taxes

The provision for federal income taxes totaled $995,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $389,000, or 64.2%, compared to the provision recorded for the 2009 period. The effective tax rates were 33.5% and 35.5% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The difference between the Corporation’s effective tax rate in the 2010 and 2009 periods and the 34% statutory corporate rate reflects adjustments caused by the tax-exempt earnings on bank-owned life insurance, tax-exempt interest on municipal obligations and tax benefits for the contribution to the Cheviot Savings Bank Foundation offset by the difference in the stock compensation deduction for tax purposes.

-16-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

General

Cheviot Financial’s net earnings totaled $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $315,000, or 22.2%, compared to the net earnings recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in net earnings reflects a $701,000 increase in general, administrative and other expenses, a $185,000 increase in the provision for loan losses and an increase of $14,000 in the provision for federal income taxes, which was partially offset by a $275,000 increase in net interest income and a $310,000 increase in other income.

Interest Income

Total interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009, totaled $16.5 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 8.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in interest income reflects the impact of a 68 basis point decrease in the average yield to 5.16% from 5.84%, which was partially offset by a $9.8 million increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets during the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.

Interest income on loans decreased by $793,000, or 5.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in interest income on loans reflects a $7.4 million, or 2.8%, decrease in the average balance outstanding during 2009 and a decrease of 14 basis points in the average yield to 5.78%. Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased by $27,000, or 5.8%, during the year ended December 31, 2009, due primarily to a decrease in the average yield of 152 basis points from 2008, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding of $2.6 million.

Interest income on investment securities decreased by $877,000, or 42.3%, during the year ended December 31, 2009, due to a decrease in the average yield of 303 basis points from 2008, which was partially offset by an increase of $7.1 million, or 19.9%, increase in the average balance outstanding. Interest income on other interest-earning assets increased by $112,000, or 133.3%, during the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was due to a $7.6 million increase in the average balance outstanding, which was partially offset by a 24 basis point decrease in the average yield.

-17-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (continued)

Interest Expense

Interest expense totaled $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 22.0%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities outstanding increased by $11.9 million during 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average cost of liabilities of 86 basis points to 2.49% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Interest expense on deposits totaled $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 28.0%, from the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was a result of a decrease in the average cost of deposits of 100 basis points to 2.16% for 2009, which was partially offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding of $11.4 million, or 5.3%, for 2009. Interest expense on borrowings totaled $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $23,000, or 1.3%, from the 2008 period. This increase resulted from an increase in the average balance of borrowings outstanding of $526,000, or 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in the average cost of deposits and borrowings reflects lower shorter term interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008, as actions by the Federal Reserve to reduce shorter term interest rates resulted in a steepening of the yield curve and a reduction of short term and medium term interest rates.

Net Interest Income

As a result of the foregoing changes in interest income and interest expense, net interest income increased by $275,000, or 2.9%, during the year ended December 31, 2009 from the year ended December 31, 2008. The Savings Bank’s cost of its liabilities decreased more significantly than the yield on its assets during 2009. The average interest rate spread increased to 2.67% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 2.49% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The net interest margin decreased to 3.10% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 3.11% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

-18-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (continued)

Provision for Losses on Loans

As a result of an analysis of historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Savings Bank, the status of past due principal and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the Savings Bank’s market area, and other factors related to the collectability of the Savings Bank’s loan portfolio, management recorded a $853,000 provision for losses on loans for the year ended December 31, 2009. Management’s analysis of the allowance resulted in a $668,000 provision for losses on loans for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decision to make a larger provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to recent periods, reflects the amount necessary to maintain an adequate allowance based on historical loss experience, changes in the local economy, and other external factors. These other external factors, economic conditions, increase in delinquent loans, and collateral value changes, have had a negative impact on non-owner occupied loans in the portfolio. These other external factors, economic conditions and collateral value changes, have had a negative impact on all types of loans in the portfolio. There can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on nonperforming loans in the future. At December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses totaled $1.0 million, or 0.41% of net loans, compared to $709,000, or 0.26% of net loans at December 31, 2008. Management believes all nonperforming loans are adequately collateralized; however, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance will be adequate to absorb losses on known nonperforming loans or that the allowance will be adequate to cover losses on nonperforming loans in the future.

Other Income

Other income totaled $813,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $310,000, or 61.6%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase is due primarily to an increase in the gain on sale of loans of $333,000 and an increase in other operating income of $11,000, which was partially offset by a an increase in loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure of $54,000.

General, Administrative and Other Expense

General, administrative and other expense totaled $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $701,000, or 9.4%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase is a result of a $273,000, or 6.3%, increase in employee compensation and benefits, an increase of $217,000, or 700.0%, in FDIC insurance premium expense and an increase of $133,000, or 20.6% in other operating expense. The increase in employee compensation and benefits is a result of the increase in compensation expense as we increased our number of full time equivalent employees to accommodate the Corporation’s growth. The increase in FDIC expense is a result of the special assessment from the FDIC to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund of approximately $140,000. The increase in other operating expense is a result of real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance expense on properties acquired through foreclosure.

-19-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (continued)

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) temporarily increased the limit on FDIC insurance coverage for deposits to $250,000 through December 31, 2013, and the FDIC took action to provide coverage for newly-issued senior unsecured debt and non-interest bearing transaction accounts in excess of the $250,000 limit, for which institutions will be assessed additional premiums.

On February 27, 2009, the FDIC announced an amendment to its restoration plan for the Deposit Insurance Fund by imposing an emergency special assessment on all insured financial institutions. This special assessment of $140,000 occurred on June 30, 2009, and was payable by us on September 30, 2009. In September 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would require insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011. The Corporation’s prepayment of FDIC assessments is approximately $968,000 which will be amortized to expense over three years.

Federal Income Taxes

The provision for federal income taxes totaled $606,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $14,000, or 2.4%, compared to the provision recorded for the 2008 period. The effective tax rates were 35.5% and 29.5% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The difference between the Corporation’s effective tax rate in the 2009 and 2008 periods and the 34% statutory corporate rate is due primarily to the tax-exempt earnings on bank-owned life insurance, tax-exempt interest on municipal obligations and tax benefits for the contribution to the Cheviot Savings Bank Foundation offset by the difference in the stock compensation deduction for tax purposes.

-20-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management of Market Risk

Qualitative Analysis

Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. The primary objective of our interest rate risk policy is to manage the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates. Our board of directors and management evaluates the interest rate risk inherent in certain assets and liabilities, determines the level of risk appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives and modifies lending, investing, deposit and borrowing strategies accordingly. Our board of directors reviews management’s activities and strategies, the effect of those strategies on the net portfolio value, and the effect that changes in market interest rates would have on net portfolio value. During 2010, short term interest rates declined, which are used to price our deposit products and are used in determining our cost of borrowings, medium and long term interest rates increased, which are used to determine the pricing of our loan products. This has resulted in an increase of our interest rate spread. Consequently, our net interest income increased in 2010 as compared to 2009.

We actively monitor interest rate risk in connection with our lending, investing, deposit and borrowing activities. We emphasize the origination of residential and multi-family fixed-rate mortgage loans, including 15, 20 and 30 year first mortgage loans, residential, multi-family and commercial real estate adjustable-rate loans, construction loans and consumer loans. Depending on market interest rates and our capital and liquidity position, we may sell our newly originated fixed-rate mortgage loans on a servicing-retained or servicing-released basis. We also invest in short-term securities, which generally have lower yields compared to longer-term investments.

Quantitative Analysis

As part of its monitoring procedures, the Asset and Liability Management Committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by analyzing the impact of alternative interest rate environments on the market value of portfolio equity, which is defined as the net present value of an institution’s existing assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet instruments, and evaluating such impacts against the maximum potential changes in market value of portfolio equity that are authorized by the Savings Bank’s board of directors.

The Office of Thrift Supervision provides the Savings Bank with the information presented in the following tables. They present the change in the Savings Bank’s net portfolio value (“NPV”) at December 31, 2010 and 2009 that would occur upon an immediate change in interest rate based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions, but without effect to any steps that management might take to counteract that change. The application of the methodology attempts to quantify interest rate risk as the change in NPV which would result from a theoretical change in market interest rates of 100, 200 and 300 basis points. Generally, NPV is the discounted present value of the difference between incoming cash flows on interest-earning assets and outgoing cash flows on interest-bearing liabilities.

-21-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quantitative Analysis (continued)
				December 31, 2010
	Change in
	Interest Rates in
	Basis Points
	(“bp”)											Net Portfolio Value
	(Rate Shock			Net Portfolio Value(3)								as % of PV of Assets(4)
	in Rates)(1)			$ Amount		$ Change			% Change			NPV Ratio(5)			Change
				(In thousands)

		+300	bp	$	46,083	$	(26,275	)		(36.3	%)		13.52	%		(584	) bp
		+200	bp		56,788		(15,570	)		(21.5	)		16.06			(330	)
		+100	bp		66,217		(6,141	)		(8.5	)		18.13			(123	)
		0	bp		72,358		--			--			19.36			--
		-100	bp		75,593		3,235			4.5			19.94			58
		-200	bp(2)		--		--			--			--			--


				December 31, 2009
	Change in
	Interest Rates in
	Basis Points
	(“bp”)											Net Portfolio Value
	(Rate Shock			Net Portfolio Value(3)								as % of PV of Assets(4)
	in Rates)(1)			$ Amount		$ Change			% Change			NPV Ratio(5)			Change
				(In thousands)

		+300	bp	$	46,959	$	(20,354	)		(30.2	%)		14.44	%		(462	) bp
		+200	bp		55,227		(12,086	)		(18.0	)		16.44			(262	)
		+100	bp		62,446		(4,867	)		(7.2	)		18.07			(99	)
		0	bp		67,313		--			--			19.06			--
		-100	bp		69,839		2,526			3.8			19.48			42
		-200	bp(2)		--		--			--			--			--

(1)	Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.

(2)	Not meaningful because some market rates would compute at a rate less than zero.

(3)	Net portfolio value represents the discounted present value of the difference between incoming cash flows on interest-earning and other assets and outgoing cash flows on interest-bearing liabilities.

(4)	Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on interest-earning assets.

(5)	NPV Ratio represents the net portfolio value divided by the present value of assets.

The model reflects that the Savings Bank’s NPV is more sensitive to an increase in interest rates than a decrease in interest rates. The above table indicates that as of December 31, 2010, in the event of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience an 8.5%, or $6.1 million, decrease in net portfolio value. In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 4.5%, or $3.2 million, increase in net portfolio value. However, given the current level of market interest rates and the low probability of further significant declines in absolute rates, we did not calculate net portfolio value for interest rate decreases of greater than 200 basis points.

-22-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quantitative Analysis (continued)

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in the above interest rate risk measurement. Modeling changes in net portfolio value requires the making of certain assumptions regarding prepayment and deposit decay rates, which may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. While we believe such assumptions to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that assumed prepayment rates and decay rates will approximate actual future loan prepayment and deposit withdrawal activity. Moreover, the NPV table presented assumes that the composition of our interest- sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the NPV table provides an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurement is not intended to and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net portfolio value and will differ from actual results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of securities and funds provided by our operations. In addition, we may borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $27.3 million and $33.7 million, respectively, in outstanding borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and had the capacity to increase such borrowings at those dates by approximately $115.3 million and $109.3 million, respectively.

Loan repayments and maturing securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of these sources of funds.

Our primary investing activities are the origination of one- to four-family real estate loans, commercial real estate, construction and consumer loans, and the purchase of securities. For the year ended December 31, 2010, loan originations totaled $63.7 million, compared to $65.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Purchases of investment securities totaled $118.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $76.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Total deposits increased $21.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, while total deposits increased $19.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2009. Deposit flows are affected by the level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by competitors and other factors. At December 31, 2010, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature within one year totaled $94.5 million. Our ability to retain these deposits will be determined in part by the interest rates we are willing to pay on such deposits.

-23-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity and Capital Resources (continued)

The following table sets forth information regarding the Corporation’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contract as of December 31, 2010.

			Payments due by period
	Less		More than		More than		More
	than		1-3		3-5		than
	1 year		years		years		5 years		Total
	(In thousands)

Contractual obligations:
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank	$	-	$	1,150	$	8,256	$	17,894	$	27,300
Certificates of deposit		94,541		37,013		10,066		-		141,620

Amount of loan commitments and expiration
per period:
Commitments to originate one- to four-family
loans		2,532		-		-		-		2,532
Home equity lines of credit		13,550		-		-		-		13,550
Commercial lines of credit		199		-		-		-		199
Undisbursed loans in process		4,482		-		-		-		4,482

Total contractual obligations	$	115,304	$	38,163	$	18,322	$	17,894	$	189,683

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital requirements. Our core (Tier 1) capital was $57.9 million and $54.6 million, or 16.2% of total assets, at both December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In order to be classified as “well-capitalized” under federal banking regulations, we were required to have core capital of at least $21.3 million, or 6.0% of assets, as of December 31, 2010. To be classified as a well-capitalized savings bank, we must also have a ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.0%. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had a total risk-based capital ratio of 34.9% and 32.9%, respectively.

-24-

Cheviot Financial Corp.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein regarding Cheviot Financial have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of Cheviot Financial’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on Cheviot Financial’s performance than does the effect of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services, because such prices are affected by inflation to a larger extent than interest rates.

-25-

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Cheviot Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

The Corporation’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, the Corporation’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, the Corporation’s management believes that as of December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Corporation’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Corporation to provide only management’s report in this annual report.



Thomas J. Linneman			Scott T. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer			Chief Financial Officer
			(principal financial officer and principal
			accounting officer)

March 16, 2011

-26-

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Cheviot Financial Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Cheviot Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cheviot Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.

Cincinnati, Ohio

March 16, 2011

105 east fourth street, ste. 1500

cincinnati, oh 45202

www.cshco.com

p. 513.241,3111

f. 513.241.1212

cincinnati | columbus | dayton | middletown | springfield

-27-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(In thousands)

ASSETS	2010			2009

Cash and due from banks	$	5,776		$	3,217
Federal funds sold		5,924			4,582
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions		6,449			3,484
Cash and cash equivalents		18,149			11,283

Investment securities available for sale - at fair value		88,382			55,851
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale - at fair value		4,279			4,920
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity - at cost, approximate market value of $4,916 and $5,816 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		4,779			5,744
Loans receivable - net		220,998			245,905
Loans held for sale-at lower of cost or market		4,440			1,097
Real estate acquired through foreclosure - net		2,007			2,048
Office premises and equipment - at depreciated cost		4,610			4,889
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - at cost		3,375			3,369
Accrued interest receivable on loans		925			1,074
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities		23			36
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-bearing deposits		392			322
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,510			1,591
Bank-owned life insurance		3,791			3,653
Prepaid federal income taxes		409			78

Total assets	$	358,069		$	341,860

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Deposits	$	257,852		$	235,904
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		27,300			33,672
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		1,440			1,501
Accrued interest payable		99			136
Accounts payable and other liabilities		1,955			1,625
Deferred federal income taxes		4			272
Total liabilities		288,650			273,110

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock - authorized 5,000,000 shares, $.01 par value; none issued
Common stock - authorized 30,000,000 shares, $.01 par value; 9,918,751 shares issued at December 31, 2010 and 2009		99			99
Additional paid-in capital		43,878			43,819
Shares acquired by stock benefit plans		(1,302	)		(2,069	)
Treasury stock - at cost, 1,053,843 and 1,050,045 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009		(12,860	)		(12,828	)
Retained earnings - restricted		40,655			40,109
Accumulated comprehensive loss, unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax benefits		(1,051	)		(380	)
Total shareholders’ equity		69,419			68,750

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	358,069		$	341,860

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-28-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands, except per share data)


	2010			2009			2008
Interest income
Loans	$	13,285		$	14,643		$	15,436
Mortgage-backed securities		289			437			464
Investment securities		1,714			1,197			2,074
Interest-earning deposits and other		150			196			84
Total interest income		15,438			16,473			18,058

Interest expense
Deposits		3,435			4,844			6,727
Borrowings		1,263			1,741			1,718
Total interest expense		4,698			6,585			8,445

Net interest income		10,740			9,888			9,613

Provision for losses on loans		550			853			668

Net interest income after provision for losses on loans		10,190			9,035			8,945

Other income
Rental		64			51			51
Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		(23	)		(102	)		(48	)
Gain (loss) on sale of office premises and equipment		-			1			(15	)
Gain on sale of loans		694			386			53
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		138			137			133
Other operating		450			340			329
Total other income		1,323			813			503

General, administrative and other expense
Employee compensation and benefits		4,489			4,604			4,331
Occupancy and equipment		664			572			582
Property, payroll and other taxes		965			984			960
Data processing		238			314			311
Legal and professional		891			444			382
Advertising		197			195			196
FDIC expense		291			248			31
Other operating		805			780			647
Total general, administrative and other expense		8,540			8,141			7,440

Earnings before income taxes		2,973			1,707			2,008

Federal income taxes (benefits)
Current		917			623			724
Deferred		78			(17	)		(132	)
Total federal income taxes		995			606			592

NET EARNINGS	$	1,978		$	1,101		$	1,416

Earnings per share - basic and diluted	$	0.23		$	0.13		$	0.16

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-29-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands)

	2010			2009			2008

Net earnings	$	1,978		$	1,101		$	1,416

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit:
Unrealized holding losses on securities during the period, net of tax benefits of $346, $123 and $96 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively		(671	)		(239	)		(187	)

Comprehensive income	$	1,307		$	862		$	1,229

Accumulated comprehensive loss	$	(1,051	)	$	(380	)	$	(141	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-30-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital			Shares acquired by stock benefit plans			Treasury stock			Retained earnings			Unrealized gains (losses)on on securities available for sale			Total shareholders’ equity

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	99	$	43,418		$	(3,582	)	$	(12,074	)	$	40,013		$	46		$	67,920

Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008		-		-			-			-			1,416			-			1,416
Cash dividends of $.36 per share		-		-			-			-			(1,153	)		-			(1,153	)
Amortization expense of stock benefit plans		-		(38	)		753			-			-			-			715
Stock option expense		-		245			-			-			-			-			245
Treasury stock repurchases		-		-			-			(725	)		-			-			(725	)
Unrealized gains on securities designated as available for sale, net of related tax benefits		-		-			-			-			-			(187	)		(187	)

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	99	$	43,625		$	(2,829	)	$	(12,799	)	$	40,276		$	(141	)	$	68,231

Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009		-		-			-			-			1,101			-			1,101
Cash dividends of $.40 per share		-		-			-			-			(1,268	)		-			(1,268	)
Amortization expense of stock benefit plans		-		(54	)		760			-			-			-			706
Stock option expense		-		248			-			-			-			-			248
Treasury stock repurchases		-		-			-			(29	)		-			-			(29	)
Unrealized gains on securities designated as available for sale, net of related tax benefits		-		-			-			-			-			(239	)		(239	)

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	99	$	43,819		$	(2,069	)	$	(12,828	)	$	40,109		$	(380	)	$	68,750

Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2010		-		-			-			-			1,978			-			1,978
Cash dividends of $.44 per share		-		-			-			-			(1,432	)		-			(1,432	)
Amortization expense of stock benefit plans		-		(37	)		767			-			-			-			730
Stock option expense		-		96			-			-			-			-			96
Treasury stock repurchases		-		-			-			(32	)		-			-			(32	)
Unrealized gains on securities designated as available for sale, net of related tax benefits		-		-			-			-			-			(671	)		(671	)

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	99	$	43,878		$	(1,302	)	$	(12,860	)	$	40,655		$	(1,051	)	$	69,419

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-31-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands)


	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings for the period	$	1,978		$	1,101		$	1,416
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment and mortgage-backed securities, net		18			29			(21	)
Depreciation		317			317			301
Amortization expense related to stock benefit plans		730			706			715
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees		105			(13	)		1
Proceeds from sale of loans in the secondary market		26,771			23,486			3,836
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market		(29,734	)		(23,100	)		(3,783	)
Gain on sale of loans		(694	)		(386	)		(53	)
Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		23			102			48
Impairment on real estate acquired through foreclosure		107			-			-
Loss on sale of office premises and equipment		-			-			15
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(6	)		-			(131	)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		(138	)		(137	)		(133	)
Provision for losses on loans		550			853			668
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in:
Accrued interest receivable on loans		149			85			(40	)
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities		13			(4	)		19
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-bearing deposits		(70	)		144			(48	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		81			(1,294	)		(143	)
Accrued interest payable		(37	)		(36	)		55
Accounts payable and other liabilities		330			556			130
Federal income taxes
Current		(331	)		82			(16	)
Deferred		78			(17	)		(132	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		240			2,474			2,704

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Principal repayments on loans		58,585			63,429			45,625
Loan disbursements		(33,991	)		(42,662	)		(65,784	)
Loans purchased		(541	)		(1,700	)		(455	)
Purchase of investment securities – available for sale		(118,720	)		(76,936	)		(18,973	)
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities – available for sale		85,101			44,000			7,000
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities – held to maturity		-			7,000			16,000
Proceeds from maturity of municipal obligations – held to maturity		-			565			-
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities – available for sale		-			(5,267	)		-
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities – available for sale		694			1,033			146
Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities – held to maturity		965			1,171			2,585
Additions to real estate acquired through foreclosure		(107	)		(222	)		(9	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		531			710			839
Purchase of office premises and equipment		(38	)		(238	)		(154	)
Proceeds from the sale of office premises and equipment		-			1			-
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(7,521	)		(9,116	)		(13,180	)

Net cash flows used in operating and investing activities balance carried forward	$	(7,281	)	$	(6,642	)	$	(10,476	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-32-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands)



	2010			2009			2008

Net cash flows used in operating and investing activities balance brought forward	$	(7,281	)	$	(6,642	)	$	(10,476	)

Cash flows provided by financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		21,948			19,856			(3,478	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		10,000			-			25,500
Repayments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(16,372	)		(10,932	)		(9,561	)
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		(61	)		37			211
Stock option expense, net		96			248			245
Treasury stock repurchases		(32	)		(29	)		(725	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(1,432	)		(1,268	)		(1,153	)
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		14,147			7,912			11,039

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		6,866			1,270			563

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		11,283			10,013			9,450

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	18,149		$	11,283		$	10,013


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Federal income taxes	$	1,238		$	537		$	744

Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	4,661		$	6,549		$	8,390


Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing activities:
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	513		$	1,574		$	1,294

Loans originated upon sales of real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	-		$	193		$	185

Recognition of mortgage servicing rights	$	206		$	182		$	23

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

-33-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In January 2004, the Board of Directors of Cheviot Savings Bank (the “Savings Bank”) completed a Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan” or the “Reorganization”) pursuant to which the Savings Bank reorganized into a two-tier mutual holding company structure with the establishment of a stock holding company, Cheviot Financial Corp. (“Cheviot Financial” or the “Corporation”) as parent of the Savings Bank, which converted to stock form, followed by the issuance of all the Savings Bank’s outstanding stock to Cheviot Financial. Pursuant to the Plan, Cheviot Financial issued 9,918,751 common shares, of which approximately 55% were issued to Cheviot Mutual Holding Company, a federally-chartered mutual holding company. Cheviot Financial sold 4,388,438 common shares, representing approximately 44% of the outstanding common stock to the Savings Bank’s depositors and a newly formed Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) at an initial issuance price of $10.00 per share. In addition, 75,000 shares, or approximately one percent of the outstanding shares, were issued to a charitable foundation established by Cheviot Financial. The Reorganization and related stock offering resulted in cash proceeds, net of offering costs and shares issued to the ESOP, totaling approximately $39.3 million.

The Corporation conducts a general banking business in southwestern Ohio which consists of attracting deposits from the general public and applying those funds to the origination of loans for residential, commercial and consumer purposes. The Corporation’s profitability is significantly dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income generated from interest-earning assets (i.e. loans and investments) and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities (i.e. customer deposits and borrowed funds). Net interest income is affected by the relative amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest received or paid on these balances. The level of interest rates paid or received by the Corporation can be significantly influenced by a number of environmental factors, such as governmental monetary policy, that are outside of management’s control.

The financial information presented herein has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and general accounting practices within the financial services industry. In preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies which, with the exception of the policy described in Note A-15, have been consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements.

1. Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Savings Bank. All significant intercompany items have been eliminated.

-34-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

2. Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities

The Corporation accounts for investment and mortgage-backed securities using 3 categories: held to maturity, trading, or available for sale. Securities classified as held to maturity are carried at cost only if the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value with resulting unrealized gains or losses recorded in shareholders’ equity. Realized gains or losses on sales of securities are recognized using the specific identification method.

3. Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are stated at the principal amount outstanding, adjusted for deferred loan origination fees and the allowance for loan losses. Interest is accrued as earned unless the collectability of the loan is in doubt. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they are contractually past due 90 days or more. Interest on loans that are contractually past due more than 90 days is charged off, or an allowance is established based on management’s periodic evaluation. The allowance is established by a charge to interest income equal to all interest previously accrued, and income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received until, in management’s judgment, the borrower’s ability to make periodic interest and principal payments has returned to normal, in which case the loan is returned to accrual status. If the ultimate collectability of the loan is in doubt, in whole or in part, all payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied to reduce principal until such doubt is eliminated.

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost (less principal payments received) or fair value (market value), calculated on an aggregate basis. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had $4.4 million in loans held for sale.

The Corporation recognizes, as separate assets, rights to service mortgage loans for others, regardless of how those servicing rights are acquired. An institution that acquires mortgage servicing rights through either the purchase or origination of mortgage loans and sells those loans with servicing rights retained must allocate some of the cost of the loans to the mortgage servicing rights at fair value. The Corporation has opted to account for the capitalized servicing rights as being amortized in proportion to and over the estimated period of servicing income.

The Corporation recorded mortgage servicing rights totaling $144,000, $147,000 and $(2,000), net of amortization of $62,000, $35,000 and $25,000, during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The carrying value of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights totaled approximately $366,000 and $222,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

-35-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

3. Loans Receivable (continued)

The Corporation was servicing mortgage loans of approximately $44.5 million and $27.9 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, all of which had been sold to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati.

4. Loan Origination Fees and Costs

Origination fees received from loans, net of direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized to interest income using the level-yield method, giving effect to actual loan prepayments. Additionally, loan origination costs are limited to the direct costs attributable to originating a loan, i.e., principally actual personnel costs. Fees received for loan commitments that are expected to be drawn upon, based on the Corporation’s experience with similar commitments, are deferred and amortized over the life of the loan using the level-yield method. Fees for other loan commitments are deferred and amortized over the loan commitment period on a straight-line basis.

5. Allowance for Loan Losses

It is the Corporation’s policy to provide valuation allowances for estimated losses on loans primarily based on past loan loss experience and economic factors such as level of delinquencies, collateral values and overall employment and economy in the market area. Additionally, the Corporation considers changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, trends in the level of delinquent and problem loans, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral and current and anticipated economic conditions in the primary lending area. When the collection of a loan becomes doubtful, or otherwise troubled, the Corporation records a charge-off equal to the difference between the fair value of the property securing the loan and the loan’s carrying value. Major loans and major lending areas are reviewed periodically to determine potential problems at an early date. The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to earnings and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries).

Impaired loans are measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as an alternative, at the loan’s observable market price or fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral- dependent.

A loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Corporation considers its investment in existing one- to four-family residential loans and consumer installment loans to be homogeneous and therefore excluded from separate identification for evaluation of impairment. With respect to the Corporation’s investment in construction, commercial and multi-family residential real estate loans, and its evaluation of impairment thereof, such loans are generally collateral-dependent and, as a result, are carried as a practical expedient at the lower of cost or fair value of collateral.

-36-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

5. Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Collateral-dependent loans which are more than ninety days delinquent are considered to constitute more than a minimum delay in repayment and are evaluated for impairment.

6. Real Estate Acquired through Foreclosure

Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of the loan’s unpaid principal balance (cost) or fair value less estimated selling expenses at the date of acquisition. A loan loss provision is recorded for any write down in the loan’s carrying value to fair value at the date of acquisition. Real estate loss provisions are recorded if the properties’ fair values subsequently decline below the value determined at the recording date. In determining the lower of cost or fair value at acquisition, costs relating to development and improvement of property are considered. Costs relating to holding real estate acquired through foreclosure, net of rental income, are charged against earnings as incurred.

7. Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The Corporation is required as a condition of membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) to maintain an investment in FHLB common stock. The stock is redeemable at par and, therefore, its cost is equivalent to its redemption value. The Corporation’s ability to redeem FHLB shares is dependent on the redemption practices of the FHLB of Cincinnati. At December 31, 2010, the FHLB of Cincinnati placed no restrictions on redemption of shares in excess of a member’s required investment in the stock.

8. Office Premises and Equipment

Office premises and equipment are carried at cost. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. For financial reporting, depreciation and amortization are provided on the straight-line and accelerated methods over the useful lives of the assets, estimated to be between fifteen and forty years for buildings and improvements, five to ten years for furniture and equipment and five years for automobiles. An accelerated method is used for tax reporting purposes.

9. Federal Income Taxes

The Corporation uses an asset and liability approach to accounting for income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A deferred tax liability or deferred tax asset is computed by applying the current statutory tax rates to net taxable or deductible temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements that will result in net taxable or deductible amounts in future periods. Deferred tax assets are recorded only to the extent that the amount of net deductible temporary differences or carryforward attributes may be utilized against current period earnings, carried back against prior years’ earnings, offset against taxable temporary differences reversing in future periods, or utilized to the extent of management’s estimate of future taxable income. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets to the extent that the value of net deductible temporary differences and carryforward attributes exceeds management’s estimates of taxes payable on future taxable income. Deferred tax liabilities are provided on the total amount of net temporary differences taxable in the future.

-37-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

9. Federal Income Taxes (continued)

The Corporation’s principal temporary differences between pretax financial income and taxable income result from different methods of accounting for deferred loan origination fees and costs, Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends, the general loan loss allowance, charitable contributions, deferred compensation and stock benefit plans. Additional temporary differences result from depreciation computed using accelerated methods for tax purposes.

As required by Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, the Corporation recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, January 1, 2007, the Corporation applied this standard to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. As a result of the implementation, the Corporation was not required to record any liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007. There have been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits since January 1, 2007.

The Corporation is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the tax years before 2007.

The Corporation will recognize, if applicable, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. No interest or penalties were recognized in the financial statements for 2010, 2009 and 2008.

10. Benefit Plans

The Corporation has a 401(k) retirement savings plan, which covers all employees who have attained the age of 21 and have completed one year of service. The Corporation is annually required to contribute 3% of eligible employees’ salaries, plus the lesser of 3% of each participant’s salary or 50% of each participant’s contributions, to the plan. Additional employer contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Employer contributions totaled $231,000, $195,000, and $177,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Corporation has a nonqualified directors deferred compensation plan (the “compensation plan”) which provides for the payment of benefits to its directors upon termination of service with the Corporation. The Corporation recorded expense of approximately $36,000, $21,000, and $21,000 for the directors deferred compensation plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

-38-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

10. Benefit Plans (continued)

In connection with the Reorganization, the Corporation implemented an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) which provides retirement benefits for substantially all full-time employees who have completed one year of service and have attained the age of 21. The Corporation records a compensation expense equal to the fair value of ESOP shares allocated to participants during a given year. Allocation of shares to the ESOP participants is predicated upon the repayment of a loan to Cheviot Financial Corp. totaling $1.2 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Dividends paid on the unallocated shares are used to fund the loan payment. The Corporation recorded expense related to the ESOP of approximately $301,000, $275,000 and $300,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The fair value of the unearned ESOP shares approximated $953,000 at December 31, 2010.

In 2005, the Corporation initiated a Management Recognition Plan (“MRP” or the “Plan”) which provided for awards of 194,408 shares to members of the board of directors, management and certain employees. Common shares awarded under the MRP vest over a five year period, commencing with the date of the grant. Expense recognized under the MRP totaled $156,000, $407,000 and $400,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, 3,375 shares, 3,025 shares and 3,025 shares were awarded under the Corporation’s MRP, respectively at a weighted average grant price of $11.57. During the year ended December 31, 2010, 35,605 shares vested at an average price of $8.24. At December 31, 2010 total non-vested shares were 37,131 at a weighted average grant date fair value of $11.57.

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate the value, is based upon the characteristics of the instruments and relevant market information. Financial instruments include cash, evidence of ownership in an entity or contracts that convey or impose on an entity the contractual right or obligation to either receive or deliver cash for another financial instrument. These fair value estimates are based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Fair value estimates are intended to represent the price for which an asset could be sold or liability could be settled. However, given there is no active market or observable market transactions for many of the Corporation’s financial instruments, it has made estimates of many of these fair values which are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimated values.

-39-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents are deemed to approximate fair value.

Investment and mortgage-backed securities: For investment and mortgage-backed securities, fair value is deemed to equal the quoted market price, where available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans receivable: The loan portfolio was segregated into categories with similar characteristics, such as one-to four-family residential, multi-family residential and commercial real estate. These loan categories were further delineated into fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans. The fair values for the resultant loan categories were computed via discounted cash flow analysis, using current interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. For loans on deposit accounts, fair values were deemed to equal the historic carrying values. The historical carrying amount of accrued interest on loans is deemed to approximate fair value.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair market value, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors, on an aggregated basis. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, market value approximates cost.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The carrying amount presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.

Deposits: The fair value of NOW accounts, passbook accounts, and money market demand deposits is deemed to approximate the amount payable on demand at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit have been estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using the interest rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of these advances is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances of similar remaining maturities or, when available, quoted market prices.

Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance: The carrying amount of advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance is deemed to approximate fair value.

Commitments to extend credit: For fixed-rate loan commitments, the fair value estimate considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and committed rates. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of loan commitments was not material.

-40-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Based on the foregoing methods and assumptions, the carrying value and fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments were as follows at December 31:

	2010				2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	value		value		value		value
	(In thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18,149	$	18,149	$	11,283	$	11,283
Investment securities		88,382		88,382		55,851		55,851
Mortgage-backed securities		9,058		9,195		10,664		10,736
Loans receivable - net and loans held for sale		225,438		233,272		247,002		258,986
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,375		3,375		3,369		3,369

	$	344,402	$	352,373	$	328,169	$	340,225

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	257,852	$	257,672	$	235,904	$	235,771
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		27,300		30,597		33,672		37,807
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		1,440		1,440		1,501		1,501

	$	286,592	$	289,709	$	271,077	$	275,079

12. Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.

13. Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions with original terms to maturity of ninety days or less.

The Corporation maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Corporation believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

14. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the year less shares in the ESOP that are unallocated and not committed to be released. Weighted-average common shares deemed outstanding gives effect to a reduction for 107,126, 142,833 and 178,540 unallocated shares held by the ESOP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

-41-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

14. Earnings Per Share (continued)

	December 31,
	2010		2009		2008

Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic)		8,723,463		8,691,554		8,684,509

Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of stock options		8,441		17,242		44,527

Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted)		8,731,904		8,708,796		8,729,036

Options to purchase 412,340 shares of common stock ranging in price from $8.48 to $13.63 were outstanding during the year but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

15. Stock Option Plan

On April 26, 2005, the Corporation approved a Stock Incentive Plan that provides for grants of up to 486,018 stock options. During 2010, 2009, and 2008 approximately 8,860, 8,060, and 8,060 option shares were granted subject to five year vesting.

The Corporation follows FASB Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718 (ASC 718), “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” for its stock option plans, and accordingly, the Corporation recognizes the expense of these grants as required. Stock-based employee compensation costs pertaining to stock options is reflected as a net increase in equity, for both any new grants, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005, in both cases using the fair values established by usage of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, expensed over the vesting period of the underlying option.

The Corporation elected the modified prospective transition method in applying ASC 718. Under this method, the provisions of ASC 718 apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption, as well as for all unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005. The compensation cost recorded for unvested equity-based awards is based on their grant-date fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded $96,000 in after-tax compensation cost for equity-based awards that vested during year. The Corporation has $68,000 unrecognized pre-tax compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based awards granted under its stock incentive plan as of December 31, 2010, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately 0.2 years. There is no intrinsic value on the vested outstanding options due to the strike price exceeding the market price at December 31, 2010.

A summary of the unvested stock awards is as follows:

				Weighted Average Fair Value
	Shares			on Award Date
Unvested at December 31, 2009		97,548		$	3.23
Awarded		8,860			4.83
Vested		(82,468	)		3.32
Unvested at December 31, 2010		23,940		$	3.52

-42-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

15. Stock Option Plan (continued)

A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plan as of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

	2010				2009				2008
	Shares		Weighted- average exercise price		Shares		Weighted- average exercise price		Shares		Weighted- average exercise price

Outstanding at beginning of year		412,340	$	11.17		404,280	$	11.16		396,220	$	11.21
Granted		8,860		8.07		8,060		8.48		8,060		9.03
Exercised		-		-		-		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-		-		-		-

Outstanding at end of year		421,200	$	11.05		412,340	$	11.11		404,280	$	11.16

Options exercisable at year-end		397,260	$	11.16		314,792	$	11.17		233,936	$	11.17

Fair value of options granted during the year			$	4.83			$	3.31			$	1.93

Cumulative option compensation cost over service period			$	1,238			$	1,195			$	1,169
(in thousands)

Weighted average remaining vesting period			2 months				7 months				18 months

The following information applies to options outstanding at December 31, 2010:


Number outstanding		421,200
Exercise price		$8.07 - $13.63
Weighted-average exercise price		$11.16
Weighted-average remaining contractual life	4.7 years

The expected term of options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at grant date. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2010, 2009 and 2008: dividend yield of 5.45%, 4.48% and 3.65%; expected volatility of 44.55%, 56.38% and 26.13%; risk-free interest rates of 3.38%, 3.25% and 3.78%; and expected lives of 10 years. The effects of expensing stock options are reported in “cash provided by financing activities” in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

-43-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

16. Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists for fair value measurements based upon the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Fair value methods and assumptions are set forth below for each type of financial instrument.

Securities available for sale: Fair value on available for sale securities were based upon a market approach. Securities which are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are valued using prices obtained from our custodian, which used third party data service providers and classified as level 2 assets. Management compares the fair values to another third party report for reasonableness. Available for sale securities includes U.S. agency securities, municipal bonds and mortgage-backed agency securities.

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)	Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant other unobservable inputs (Level 3)

Securities available for sale at December 31, 2010:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	87,009
Municipal obligations		$	1,373
Mortgage-backed securities		$	4,279

Securities available for sale at December 31, 2009:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	54,455
Municipal obligations		$	1,396
Mortgage-backed securities		$	4,920

-44-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

16. Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities (continued)

The Corporation is predominately an asset-based lender with real estate serving as collateral on a substantial majority of loans. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair values of the underlying real estate collateral. Such fair values are obtained using independent appraisals based on comparable sales, which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate carrying amount of impaired loans at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were approximately $4.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

The Corporation has real estate acquired through foreclosure totaling $2.0 million at both December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of the cost or fair value less estimated selling expenses at the date of acquisition. Fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, based on comparable sales which the Corporation considers to be Level 2 inputs. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure that is carried at fair value was approximately $1.1 million and $732,000 at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The aggregate amount of real estate acquired through foreclosure that is carried at cost was approximately $936,000 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

17. Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted the following accounting guidance in 2010, none of which had a material effect, if any, on our year-end consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01 “Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash,” which updated the Codification on accounting for distributions to shareholders that offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” as the guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures. The guidance in ASU 2010-06 requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. Furthermore, ASU 2010-06 requires a reporting entity to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs; clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value; and amends guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets to require that disclosures be provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of assets. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective January 1, 2011 and for interim periods thereafter. In the period of initial adoption, entities will not be required to provide the amended disclosures for any previous periods presented for comparative purposes. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to significantly impact our annual and interim financial statement disclosures and will not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

-45-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

17. Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for companies that are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. All of the amendments in the ASU were effective upon issuance, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors, which will be effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” which clarifies that the only type of embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is exempt from derivative bifurcation requirements is one that is in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination will need to assess those embedded credit derivatives to determine if bifurcation and separate accounting as a derivative is required. This guidance is effective on July 1, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of an entity’s first interim reporting period beginning after issuance of this guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Codification Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-18 (ASU No. 2010-18) Effect of Loan Modification when the Loan is Part of a Pool that is accounted for as a Single Asset (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this update affect any entity that acquires loans subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASU No. 2010-18 is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the interim period ending September 30, 2010, and the amendments are to be applied prospectively. . The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

-46-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

17. Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The ASU amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “Codification” or “ASC”) Topic 310, Receivables, to improve the disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate, by portfolio segment or class of financing receivable, certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses.

In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-20, “Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This purpose of this Update is to improve transparency by companies that hold financing receivables, including loans, leases and other long-term receivables. The Update requires such companies to disclose more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables and the credit reserves against them. This guidance became effective during the three month period ended December 31, 2010, with the exception of certain disclosures which include information for activity that occurs during a reporting period (activity in the allowance for credit losses and modifications of financing receivables) which will be effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2010.

The following accounting guidance will be adopted in 2011, and is not expected to have a material impact, if any, on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

-47-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

17. Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-1, “Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20”, which delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20 in order to allow the FASB time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of the remaining amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

18. Subsequent Events

The Corporation evaluates events and transactions occurring subsequent to the date of the financial statements for matters requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

NOTE B - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of investment securities at December 31 are shown below.

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized cost			Gross unrealized holding gains			Gross unrealized holding losses			Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	88,529		$	102		$	1,622		$	87,009
Municipal obligations			1,545			5			177			1,373

		$	90,074		$	107		$	1,799		$	88,382

-48-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE B - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (continued)


	December 31, 2009
				Gross		Gross		Estimated
		Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		fair
		cost		holding gains		holding losses		value
	(In thousands)
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government agency securities		$	54,915	$	67	$	527	$	54,455
Municipal obligations			1,545		4		153		1,396

		$	56,460	$	71	$	680	$	55,851

An investment security with a carrying value of approximately $500,000 at December 31, 2010 was pledged to secure an investment in the Senior Housing Crime Prevention Foundation.

The amortized cost of investment securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, by contractual term to maturity, are shown below.

	December 31,
	2010		2009
	(In thousands)
Less than one year	$	20,997	$	24,919
One to five years		53,345		22,996
Five to ten years		4,497		2,310
More than ten years		11,235		6,235

	$	90,074	$	56,460

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown below.

	December 31, 2010
				Gross			Gross			Estimated
	Amortized			unrealized			unrealized			fair
	cost			holding gains			holding losses			value
	(In thousands)
Available for sale:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates		$	723		$	13		$	-		$	736
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			548			17			-			565
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			2,908			70			-			2,978

		$	4,179		$	100		$	-		$	4,279

-49-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE B - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (continued)


Held to maturity:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificate	$	464	$	10	$	1	$	473
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates		515		7		-		522
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificate		3,800		121		-		3,921

	$	4,779	$	138	$	1	$	4,916

	December 31, 2009
				Gross			Gross			Estimated
	Amortized			unrealized			unrealized			fair
	cost			holding gains			holding losses			value
	(In thousands)
Available for sale:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates		$	829		$	1		$	-		$	830
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			700			9			-			709
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			3,358			24			1			3,381

		$	4,887		$	34		$	1		$	4,920

Held to maturity:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation adjustable-rate participation certificates		$	603		$	1		$	7		$	597
Federal National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			640			3			1			642
Government National Mortgage Association adjustable-rate participation certificates			4,501			76			-			4,577

		$	5,744		$	80		$	8		$	5,816

The amortized cost of mortgage-backed securities, including those designated as available for sale, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, by contractual terms to maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may generally prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.

-50-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE B - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (continued)

	December 31,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Due in one year or less		$	359		$	611
Due in one year through five years			1,543			2,704
Due in five years through ten years			2,199			4,047
Due in more than ten years			4,857			3,269

		$	8,958		$	10,631

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010 and 2009:

									December 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months								12 months or longer								Total
Description of securities	Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses			Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses			Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

U.S. Government agency securities		17		$	61,360		$	1,622		-		$	-		$	-		17		$	61,360		$	1,622
Municipal obligations		-			-			-		2			1,058			177		2			1,058			177
Mortgage-backed securities		-			-			-		1			9			1		1			9			1

Total temporarily impaired securities		17		$	61,360		$	1,622		3		$	1,067		$	178		20		$	62,427		$	1,800

									December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 months								12 months or longer								Total
Description of securities	Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses			Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses			Number of investments		Fair value			Unrealized holding losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

U.S. Government agency securities		13		$	26,996		$	523		1		$	1,000		$	4		14		$	27,996		$	527
Municipal obligations		-			-			-		2			1,235			153		2			1,235			153
Mortgage-backed securities		3			137			5		13			1,537			4		16			1,674			9

Total temporarily impaired securities		16		$	27,133		$	528		16		$	3,772		$	161		32		$	30,905		$	689

Management does not intend to sell any of the debt securities with an unrealized loss and does not believe that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position prior to a recovery in value. The fair values are expected to recover as securities approach maturity dates. The Company has evaluated these securities and has determined that the decline in their values is temporary.

-51-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE B - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (continued)

All of the Corporation’s agency and mortgage-backed securities are backed by either a U.S. Government agency or government-sponsored agency and are not considered to have credit quality issues and the decline in fair value is due to interest rate changes.

The Corporation’s municipal bond securities have all been rated investment grade or higher by various rating agencies or have been subject to an annual internal review process by management. This annual review process for non-rated securities considers a review of the issuers’ current financial statements, including the related cash flows and interest payments. We concluded that the unrealized loss positions on these securities is a result of the level of market interest rates and not a result of the underlying issuers’ ability to repay.

We do not intend to sell any of the debt securities with an unrealized loss and do not believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position prior to a recovery in its value. The fair value of these debt securities is expected to recover as the securities approach maturity. Accordingly, we have not recognized any other-than-temporary impairment in our consolidated statements of income.

NOTE C - LOANS RECEIVABLE

The composition of the loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, at December 31 was as follows:


	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

One- to four-family residential	$	195,801		$	220,714
Multi-family residential		8,594			9,114
Construction		7,081			4,868
Commercial		19,329			15,925
Consumer		207			51
		231,012			250,672
Less:
Undisbursed portion of loans in process		4,482			2,696
Deferred loan origination fees		(150	)		(51	)
Allowance for loan losses		1,242			1,025

	$	225,438		$	247,002

-52-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE C – LOAN RECEIVABLE (continued)

The Corporation’s lending efforts have historically focused on one- to four-family and multi-family residential real estate loans, which comprise approximately $207.0 million, or 92% of the net loan portfolio, at December 31, 2010 and approximately $232.0 million, or 94% of the net loan portfolio, at December 31, 2009. Generally, such loans have been underwritten on the basis of no more than an 85% loan-to-value ratio, which has historically provided the Corporation with adequate collateral coverage in the event of default. Nevertheless, the Corporation, as with any lending institution, is subject to the risk that real estate values could deteriorate in its primary lending area of southwestern Ohio, thereby impairing collateral values.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has made loans to its executive officers and directors. Loans to these officers and directors, as well as employees, are made at reduced interest rates and closing costs. These loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability. The aggregate dollar amount of loans to executive officers and directors totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, one new line of credit was originated to a director totaling $100,000. During the year ended December 31, 2010, there were repayments of approximately $91,000.

The Company participates in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati’s Mortgage Purchase Program which provides the Company the ability to sell conventional mortgage loans in the secondary market. The program utilizes a Lender Risk Account (LRA) which is funded through the proceeds of individual mortgages sold. One LRA is established for each master commitment and the amount deposited into the LRA is approximately thirty to fifty basis points of each original loan balance.

If a loss on an individual loan is in excess of homeowner equity and (if applicable) primary mortgage insurance, funds are withdrawn from the related LRA to cover the shortfall. The Company is eligible to receive LRA funds, net of any losses, beginning in the sixth year from the date a master commitment is fulfilled and ending in the eleventh year or when all of the loans sold under a master commitment have been paid in full. The Company’s LRA totaled $292,000 at December 31, 2010 and $182,000 at December 31, 2009. The amount is reported in other assets and as deferred income until the FHLB remits amounts to the Company based on loan performance, at which time revenue will be recognized. During 2010 and 2009, the Company received payments of $5,000 and $3,000 which were recognized in other income.

-53-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE D - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

	Real Estate Loans – mortgage
	One-to four
	Family			Multi-family
2010	Residential			Residential		Construction		Commercial			Consumer		Total

Allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance	$	892		$	30	$	28	$	75		$	-	$	1,025
Provision		364			19		5		161			1		550
Charge-offs		(277	)		-		-		(56	)		-		(333	)
Recoveries		-			-		-		-			-		-

Ending balance	$	979		$	49	$	33	$	180		$	1	$	1,242

Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	217		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	217

Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	762		$	49	$	33	$	180		$	1	$	1,025

Ending balance:
loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	--		$	-	$	-

Loans receivable:

Ending balance	$	195,801		$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329		$	207	$	231,012

Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,989		$	-	$	-	$	222		$	-	$	5,211

Ending balance:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	190,812		$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,107		$	207	$	225,801

Ending balance:
loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		-			-		-		--			-		-


2009 and 2008	2009				2008
	(In thousands)

Beginning balance		$	709			$	596
Provision for losses on loans			853				668
Charge-offs of loans			(537	)			(572	)
Recoveries			-				17

Ending balance		$	1,025			$	709

-54-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE D - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)

Credit Quality Indicators

As of December 31, 2010

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

	Real Estate Loans – mortgage
	One-to four Family Residential		Multi-family Residential		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	190,812	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,107	$	207	$	225,801
Special mention		-		-		-		-		-		-
Substandard		4,989		-		-		222		-		5,211
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	195,801	$	8,594	$	7,081	$	19,329	$	207	$	231,012

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans Receivable As of December 31, 2010
																			Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing
	30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			Greater than 90 Days			Total Past Due			Current			Total Loan Receivables


Real Estate:
1-4 family
Residential		$	588		$	429		$	4,695		$	5,712		$	190,089		$	195,801		-
Multi-family
Residential			-			-			-			-			8,594			8,594		-
Construction			-			-			-			-			7,081			7,081		-
Commercial			-			46			160			206			19,123			19,329		-
Consumer			-			-			-			-			207			207		-
Total		$	588		$	475		$	4,855		$	5,918		$	225,094		$	231,012		-

Impaired Loans

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010


	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized

With no related
allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	4,038	$	4,038	$	-	$	104	$	126
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		-		-		-		-		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		222		222		-		111		2
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	4,260	$	4,260	$	-	$	215	$	128

-55-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE D - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized

With an allowance recorded:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	734	$	951	$	217	$	56	$	9
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		-		-		-		-		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	734	$	951	$	217	$	56	$	9
Total:
Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	4,772	$	4,989	$	217	$	92	$	135
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		-		-		-		-		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		222		222		-		111		2
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	4,994	$	5,211	$	217	$	203	$	137

Loan Receivable on Nonaccrual Status

As of December 31, 2010


Real Estate:
1-4 family	$	4,695
Residential
Multi-family
Residential		-
Construction		-
Commercial		160
Consumer		-
Total	$	4,855

At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses was comprised of a general loan loss allowance of $1.0 million, $876,000 and $679,000, respectively, which is includible as a component of regulatory risk-based capital, and a specific loan loss allowance totaling $217,000 at December 31, 2010, $149,000 at December 31, 2009 and $30,000 at December 31, 2008. Nonperforming and impaired loans totaled approximately $4.9 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, impaired loans of approximately $951,000 had specific reserves of $217,000. At December 31, 2010, all loans past due more than 90 days were non-accrual. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, interest income of approximately $199,000, $92,000 and $126,000, respectively, would have been recognized had nonperforming loans been performing in accordance with contractual terms.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation had total troubled debt restructurings of $2.4 million. These loans were modified due to short term concessions with no impairment as the Corporation expects to recognize the full amount of the commitment. The Corporation has no commitments to lend additional funds to these debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.

-56-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE E - OFFICE PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Office premises and equipment are comprised of the following at December 31:


	2010		2009
	(In thousands)

Land	$	1,044	$	1,044
Buildings and improvements, including construction-in-progress		5,875		5,875
Furniture and equipment		1,283		1,245
Automobiles		45		45
		8,247		8,209
Less accumulated depreciation		3,637		3,320

	$	4,610	$	4,889

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had capitalized interest costs of approximately $11,000 related to the construction of branch offices.

NOTE F - DEPOSITS

Deposits consist of the following major classifications at December 31:


Deposit type and weighted-average	2010		2009
interest rate	(In thousands)

NOW accounts
2010 - 0.22%	$	32,929
2009 - 0.29%			$	24,426
Passbook accounts
2010 - 0.15%		14,994
2009 - 0.24%				15,096
Money market demand deposit
2010 – 0.76%		68,309
2009 – 0.92%				54,549

Total demand, transaction and passbook deposits		116,232		94,071

-57-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE F - DEPOSITS (continued)


Certificates of deposit
Original maturities of:
Less than 12 months
2010 – 0.66%		20,403
2009 – 1.11%				30,012
12 to 18 months
2010 – 1.21%		60,649
2009 – 2.03%				61,231
24 months – 36 months
2010 – 1.88%		35,054
2009 – 2.58%				28,033
Over 36 months
2010 - 3.85%		25,514
2009 - 4.27%				22,557

Total certificates of deposit		141,620		141,833

Total deposits	$	257,852	$	235,904

The Savings Bank had deposit accounts with balances in excess of $100,000 totaling $81.2 million and $61.6 million, including intercompany accounts totaling $8.0 million and $6.7 million, which are eliminated in consolidation, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act permanently raised the standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000.

Interest expense on deposits is summarized as follows at December 31:


	2010		2009		2008
			(In thousands)

Passbook savings and money market demand deposits	$	512	$	546	$	695
NOW deposits		69		75		98
Certificates of deposit		2,854		4,223		5,934

	$	3,435	$	4,844	$	6,727

Maturities of outstanding certificates of deposit at December 31 are summarized as follows:



	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Less than six months		$	53,405		$	57,144
Six months to one year			41,136			42,906
Over one year to three years			37,013			30,770
Over three years			10,066			11,013
		$	141,620		$	141,833

-58-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE F - DEPOSITS (continued)

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation accepted deposits from officers and directors. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, total deposits from officers and directors totaled approximately $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

NOTE G - ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, collateralized at December 31, 2010 and 2009 by pledges of certain residential mortgage loans totaling $34.1 million and $42.1 million, respectively, and the Savings Bank’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock are summarized as follows:


Interest rate range	Maturing year ending December 31,	2010			2009
(at fixed rates)		(Dollars in thousands)

2.98% - 4.61%	2010	$	-		$	9,000
3.89% - 5.44%	2012		1,150			2,023
3.75% - 4.84%	2014		2,291			3,027
4.31% - 5.36%	2015		5,965			7,733
5.25%	2016		667			868
5.27% - 5.35%	2017		1,969			2,643
3.29% - 4.18%	2018		6,024			8,378
1.81%	2020		9,234			-

		$	27,300		$	33,672

Weighted-average interest rate			3.64	%		4.33	%

The borrowings require principal payments as follows:

2011	$	4,274
2012		4,409
2013		4,254
2014		4,061
2015		3,166
Thereafter		7,136

	$	27,300

-59-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE H - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

Federal income tax on earnings differs from that computed at the statutory corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 as follows:


	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)

Federal income taxes at statutory rate	$	1,011		$	580		$	683
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting primarily from:
Stock compensation		66			117			68
Charitable contributions carryforwards		-			(57	)		(74	)
Nontaxable interest income		(22	)		(24	)		(30	)
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(47	)		(47	)		(45	)
Other		(13	)		37			(10	)

Federal income taxes per financial statements	$	995		$	606		$	592

Effective tax rate		33.5	%		35.5	%		29.5	%

The composition of the Corporation’s net deferred tax liability at December 31 is as follows:


Taxes (payable) refundable on temporary	2010			2009
differences at statutory rate:	(In thousands)

Deferred tax assets:
General loan loss allowance	$	347		$	298
Deferred compensation		86			97
Stock benefit plans		152			212
Unrealized losses on securities available for sale		541			196
Merger related transaction costs		90			-
Other		5			2
Total deferred tax assets		1,221			805

Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred loan origination costs		(250	)		(216	)
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(784	)		(784	)
Book/tax depreciation		(67	)		(1	)
Mortgage servicing rights		(124	)		(76	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(1,225	)		(1,077	)

Net deferred tax liability	$	(4	)	$	(272	)

The Corporation was allowed a special bad debt deduction, generally limited to 8% of otherwise taxable income, subject to certain limitations based on aggregate loans and deposit account balances at the end of the year. If the amounts that qualified as deductions for federal income taxes are later used for purposes other than bad debt losses, including distributions in liquidation, such distributions will be subject to federal income taxes at the then current corporate income tax rate. Retained earnings at December 31, 2010 include approximately $3.0 million for which federal income taxes have not been provided. The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to the cumulative bad debt deduction at December 31, 2010 was approximately $1.0 million. During 2006, the Corporation elected to file a consolidated federal tax return with the Bank. This enabled the Corporation to utilize approximately $217,000 of charitable contribution carryforwards for both years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had fully utilized the charitable contribution carryforwards.

-60-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE I - COMMITMENTS

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers, including commitments to extend credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statements of financial condition. The contract or notional amounts of the commitments reflect the extent of the Corporation’s involvement in such financial instruments.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as those utilized for on-balance-sheet instruments.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had outstanding commitments to originate fixed-rate loans with interest rates ranging from 3.95% to 5.25% totaling $2.3 million and $2.3 million in fixed rate loans and $276,000 and $463,000 in variable rate loans, respectively, secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. Additionally, the Corporation had unused lines of credit under home equity loans totaling $13.6 million and $12.8 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In the opinion of management, all loan commitments equaled or exceeded prevalent market interest rates as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and such commitments have been underwritten on the same basis as that of the existing loan portfolio. Management believes that all loan commitments are able to be funded through cash flow from operations and existing excess liquidity. Fees received in connection with these commitments have not been recognized in earnings.

In 2009, the Savings Bank entered into contract with COCC for the next six and a half years. COCC will provide the CORE banking services for the Savings Bank at a minimum annual cost of $245,000.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Savings Bank had a $1.0 million line of credit with another local bank. No funds have been drawn on this line of credit as of December 31, 2010.

-61-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE J - REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Savings Bank is subject to minimum regulatory capital standards promulgated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on its financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Savings Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Savings Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Savings Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The minimum capital standards of the OTS generally require the maintenance of regulatory capital sufficient to meet each of three tests, hereinafter described as the tangible capital requirement, the core capital requirement and the risk-based capital requirement. The tangible capital requirement provides for minimum tangible capital (defined as shareholders’ equity less all intangible assets) equal to 1.5% of adjusted total assets. The core capital requirement provides for minimum core capital (tangible capital plus certain forms of supervisory goodwill and other qualifying intangible assets) generally equal to 4.0% of adjusted total assets, except for those associations with the highest examination rating and acceptable levels of risk. The risk-based capital requirement provides for the maintenance of core capital plus general loss allowances equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. In computing risk-weighted assets, the Corporation multiplies the value of each asset on its statement of financial condition by a defined risk-weighting factor, e.g., one- to four-family residential loans carry a risk-weighted factor of 50%.

During 2009, the Savings Bank was notified by the OTS that it was categorized as “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Additionally, management is not aware of any recent event that would cause this classification to change. To be categorized as “well-capitalized,” the Savings Bank must maintain minimum capital ratios as set forth in the following table.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Savings Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.

-62-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE J - REGULATORY CAPITAL (continued)

	As of December 31, 2010
	Actual					For capital adequacy purposes			To be “well- capitalized” under prompt corrective action provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)

Tangible capital	$	57,854		16.2	%	≥$	5,320	≥1.5 %	≥$	17,735	≥ 5.0 %

Core capital	$	57,854		16.2	%	≥$	14,188	≥4.0 %	≥$	21,282	≥ 6.0 %

Risk-based capital	$	58,876		34.9	%	≥$	13,488	≥8.0 %	≥$	16,860	≥10.0 %

	As of December 31, 2009
	Actual					For capital adequacy purposes			To be “well- capitalized” under prompt corrective action provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)

Tangible capital	$	54,612		16.2	%	≥$	5,035	≥1.5 %	≥$	16,785	≥ 5.0 %

Core capital	$	54,612		16.2	%	≥$	13,428	≥4.0 %	≥$	20,142	≥ 6.0 %

Risk-based capital	$	55,488		32.9	%	≥$	13,442	≥8.0 %	≥$	16,803	≥10.0 %

The Savings Bank’s management believes that, under the current regulatory capital regulations, the Savings Bank will continue to meet its minimum capital requirements in the foreseeable future. However, events beyond the control of the Savings Bank, such as increased interest rates or a downturn in the economy in the Savings Bank’s market area, could adversely affect future earnings and, consequently, the ability to meet future minimum regulatory capital requirements.

The Savings Bank is subject to regulations imposed by the OTS regarding the amount of capital distributions payable by the Savings Bank to Cheviot Financial. Generally, the Savings Bank’s payment of dividends is limited, without prior OTS approval, to net earnings for the current calendar year plus the two preceding calendar years, less capital distributions paid over the comparable time period. Insured institutions are required to file an application with the OTS for capital distributions. Dividends totaling $3.5 million were paid to Cheviot Financial Corp. in 2009.

Regulations of the OTS governing mutual holding companies permit Cheviot Mutual Holding Company (the “Holding Company”) to waive the receipt by it of any common stock dividend declared by Cheviot Financial or the Savings Bank, provided the OTS does not object to such waiver. Pursuant to these provisions, the Holding Company waived $2.4 million in dividends during 2010.

-63-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE K - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following condensed financial statements summarize the financial position of the Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(In thousands)

ASSETS	2010			2009

Cash in Cheviot Savings Bank	$	8,015		$	6,705
Cash and due from banks		32			33
Investment securities available for sale – at fair value		3,011			6,036
Loan receivable - ESOP		1,223			1,600
Investment in Cheviot Savings Bank		56,833			54,241
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-bearing deposits		12			20
Prepaid federal income taxes		442			134

Total assets	$	69,568		$	68,769

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	70		$	12
Deferred federal income taxes		79			7
Total liabilities		149			19

Common stock		99			99
Additional paid-in capital		43,878			43,819
Shares acquired by stock benefit plans		(1,302	)		(2,069	)
Treasury stock		(12,860	)		(12,828	)
Retained earnings		40,655			40,109
Accumulated comprehensive loss,
Unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax benefits		(1,051	)		(380	)

Total shareholders’ equity	$	69,419		$	68,750

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	69,568		$	68,769

-64-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE K - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

STATEMENT OF EARNINGS

Year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands)

	2010			2009			2008

Income
Interest income	$	166		$	68		$	70
Equity in earnings of Cheviot Savings Bank		2,429			1,218			1,528
Total income		2,595			1,286			1,598

General, administrative and other expense		849			245			240

Earnings before federal income tax benefits		1,746			1,041			1,358

Federal income tax benefits		(232	)		(60	)		(58	)

Net earnings	$	1,978		$	1,101		$	1,416

-65-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE K - CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued)

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In thousands)

	2010			2009			2008

Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities:
Net earnings for the year	$	1,978		$	1,101		$	1,416
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment securities, net		17			21			-
Equity in undistributed earnings of Cheviot Savings Bank		(2,901	)		1,664			(2,143	)
Amortization of expense related to stock benefit plans		730			706			715
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in
Accrued interest receivable on investments and interest-bearing deposits		8			(20	)		-
Prepaid expenses and other assets		19			466			(466	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		58			(87	)		4
Prepaid federal income taxes
Current		(308	)		(59	)		(62	)
Deferred		75			-			-
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(324	)		3,792			(536	)

Cash flows provided (used) by investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities – available for sale		(6,999	)		(8,039	)		-
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities – available for sale		10,000			2,000			-
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities		3,001			(6,039	)		-

Cash flows used in financing activities:
Stock option expense, net		96			248			245
Treasury stock repurchases		(32	)		(29	)		(725	)
Dividends paid		(1,432	)		(1,268	)		(1,153	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,368	)		(1,049	)		(1,633	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,309			(3,296	)		(2,169	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		6,738			10,034			12,203

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	8,047		$	6,738		$	10,034

-66-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE L - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
2010:	(In thousands, except per share data)

Total interest income	$	3,597	$	3,841	$	3,993	$	4,007
Total interest expense		1,066		1,130		1,221		1,281

Net interest income		2,531		2,711		2,772		2,726
Provision for losses on loans		300		150		60		40
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,231		2,561		2,712		2,686
Other income		481		473		187		182
General, administrative and other expense		2,415		2,061		1,966		2,098

Earnings before income taxes		297		973		933		770
Federal income taxes		83		290		355		267

Net earnings	$	214	$	683	$	578	$	503

Earnings per share:
Basic and diluted	$	.03	$	.08	$	.06	$	.06

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
2009:	(In thousands, except per share data)

Total interest income	$	3,955	$	4,081	$	4,105	$	4,332
Total interest expense		1,431		1,591		1,718		1,845

Net interest income		2,524		2,490		2,387		2,487
Provision for losses on loans		50		351		115		337
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,474		2,139		2,272		2,150
Other income		160		179		243		231
General, administrative and other expense		2,097		1,883		2,181		1,980

Earnings before income taxes		537		435		334		401
Federal income taxes		195		194		109		108

Net earnings	$	342	$	241	$	225	$	293

Earnings per share:
Basic and diluted	$	.04	$	.03	$	.03	$	.03

-67-

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

NOTE M –SUBSEQUENT EVENT AND POTENTIAL ACQUISITION

On March 1, 2011 the Corporation received approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision to acquire First Franklin Corporation (First Franklin) and its subsidiary Franklin Savings and Loan Company, an Ohio chartered savings and loan association. At December 31, 2010, First Franklin had approximately $271.4 million in assets, $250.7 million in liabilities and $20.7 million in equity. First Franklin’s subsidiary operates 7 full service branch offices in the Cincinnati, Ohio area. The acquisition is expected to close on or about March 16, 2011.

Under the terms of the agreement the shareholders of First Franklin will receive in cash, $14.50 for each share of common stock held on the closing date. In addition, the merger agreement provides that all options to purchase First Franklin stock that are outstanding and unexercised, immediately prior to the closing under First Franklin’s various stock option plans, will be cancelled in exchange for a cash payment equal to the positive difference between $14.50 and the exercise price. The estimated aggregate cost of the transaction is $24.4 million.

-68-

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Directors of Cheviot
Financial Corp. and	Officers of	Officers of
Cheviot Savings Bank	Cheviot Financial Corp.	Cheviot Savings Bank

Thomas J. Linneman	Thomas J. Linneman	Thomas J. Linneman
President and Chief	President and Chief	President and Chief
Executive Officer	Executive Officer	Executive Officer

James E. Williamson	Scott T. Smith	Jeffrey J. Lenzer
Executive Secretary,	Chief Financial Officer	Vice President, Operations
Retired District Administrator	(principal financial officer
of Oak Hills Local	and principal accounting	Kevin M. Kappa
School District	officer)	Vice President, Compliance

Edward L. Kleemeier		Deborah A. Fischer
Retired District Fire Chief,		Vice President, Lending
City of Cincinnati
		Scott T. Smith
John T. Smith		Chief Financial Officer
Secretary/Treasurer		(principal financial officer
of Hawkstone Associates		and principal accounting
		officer)
Robert L. Thomas
Owner/Operator
R&R Quality Meats
and Catering

Steven R. Hausfeld
CPA/Owner
Steven R. Hausfeld, CPA

-69-

INVESTOR AND CORPORATE INFORMATION

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of shareholders will be held at 3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time, on April 26, 2011 at the Cheviot Savings Bank Corporate Offices located at 3723 Glenmore Avenue, Cheviot, Ohio.

Stock Listing

Cheviot Financial Corp. common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CHEV.”

As of March 2, 2011, there were 9,918,751 shares of Cheviot Financial Corp. common stock issued (including unallocated ESOP shares) and there were approximately 775 registered holders of record.

Set forth below are the high and low prices of our common stock for the year, as well as our quarterly dividend payment history.

Quarter Ended	High		Low		Dividend paid

March 31, 2010	$	9.22	$	7.22	$	0.11
June 30, 2010	$	9.50	$	7.55	$	0.11
September 30, 2010	$	8.95	$	7.53	$	0.11
December 31, 2010	$	9.49	$	8.09	$	0.11

March 31, 2009	$	7.69	$	5.89	$	0.10
June 30, 2009	$	9.80	$	6.65	$	0.10
September 30, 2009	$	9.00	$	7.18	$	0.10
December 31, 2009	$	8.32	$	7.01	$	0.10

Shareholder and General Inquiries	Transfer Agent

Cheviot Financial Corp.	Registrar and Transfer Company
3723 Glenmore Avenue	10 Commerce Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45211	Cranford, New Jersey 07016
(513) 661-0457	(800) 525-7686
Attn: Kimberly A. Siener
Investor Relations

Registered Independent Auditors	Corporate Counsel

Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.	Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.
105 East Fourth Street	5335 Wisconsin Avenue NW
Suite 1500	Suite 400
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202	Washington, DC 20015
(513) 241-3111	(202) 274-2000

Annual Reports

A copy, without exhibits, of the Cheviot Financial Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be obtained without charge by contacting Kimberly A. Siener, Investor Relations, Cheviot Financial Corp., 3723 Glenmore Avenue, Cheviot, Ohio 45211. It may also be accessed through our website at www.cheviotsavings.com.

-70-

OFFICE LOCATIONS

Full Service Banking Locations

Main Office:	Cheviot	Branch Offices:	Monfort Heights
	3723 Glenmore Avenue		5550 Cheviot Road
	Cheviot, Ohio 45211		Cincinnati, Ohio 45247
	(513) 661-0457		(513) 389-3325

			Bridgetown
			6060 Bridgetown Road
			Cincinnati, Ohio 45248
			(513) 389-3333

			Harrison
			1194 Stone Drive
			Harrison, Ohio 45030
			(513) 202-5490

			Delhi
			585 Anderson Ferry Road
			Cincinnati, Ohio 45238
			(513) 347-4991

			Taylor Creek
			7072 Harrison Avenue
			Cincinnati, Ohio 45247
			(513) 353-5140

-71-


	3723 Glenmore Avenue Cheviot, OH 45211

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

CHEVIOT FINANCIAL CORP Reports