Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| 8-K/A - VANITY EVENTS FORM 8-K/A - Thinspace Technology, Inc. | form8ka.htm |
| EX-99.2 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - Thinspace Technology, Inc. | ex992.htm |
| EX-99.3 - EXHIBIT 99.3 - Thinspace Technology, Inc. | ex993.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
Shogun Energy, Inc.
|
Index to Financial Statements
|
||
|
Page
|
||
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
|
|
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
|
F-2
|
|
|
Statement of Operations for the period from September 25, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009
|
F-3
|
|
|
Statement of Deficiency in Stockholders' Equity for the period from September 25, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009
|
F-4
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows for the period from September 25, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009
|
F-5
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
F-6 to F-12
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Shogun Energy, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Shogun Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2009, and the related statements of operations, deficiency of stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from September 25, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We have conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shogun Energy, Inc. as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from September 25, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements, the Company has suffered losses since inception and is experiencing difficulty in generating sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations and sustain its operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to this matter are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
|
/s/ RBSM LLP
|
|||
New York, New York
March 11, 2010
F-1
SHOGUN ENERGY, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Assets
|
||||
|
Current assets:
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ |
1,592
|
||
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
||||
|
of $0
|
2,126
|
|||
|
Inventory
|
5,059
|
|||
|
Receivable from related party
|
7,112
|
|||
|
Total current assets
|
15,889
|
|||
|
Property and equipment, net
|
34,045
|
|||
|
Total assets
|
$ |
49,934
|
||
|
Liabilities and deficiency in stockholders' equity
|
||||
|
Current liabilities:
|
||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ |
36,145
|
||
|
Notes payable - bank, current portion
|
139,000
|
|||
|
Notes payable - related parties
|
69,341
|
|||
|
Advances payable - related parties
|
18,446
|
|||
|
Total current liabilities
|
262,932
|
|||
|
Deficiency in stockholders' equity:
|
||||
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
|
||||
|
426,160 shares issued and outstanding
|
426
|
|||
|
Additional paid in capital
|
574
|
|||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(213,998)
|
|||
|
Total deficiency in stockholders' equity
|
(212,998)
|
|||
|
Total liabilities and deficiency in stockholders' equity
|
$ |
49,934
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-2
SHOGUN ENERGY, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
Period from
|
||||
|
September 25, 2009
|
||||
|
(Inception)
|
||||
|
Through December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | 10,351 | ||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
144,043 | |||
|
Gross profit
|
(133,692 | ) | ||
|
Operating expense
|
80,306 | |||
|
Loss from operations
|
(213,998 | ) | ||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
- | |||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (213,998 | ) | |
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
$ | (0.50 | ) | |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding,
|
||||
|
Basic and diluted
|
426,160 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
SHOGUN ENERGY, INC.
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCY IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
Additional
|
Deficiency in
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Paid In
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, September 25, 2009
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
Sale of common stock
|
426,160 | 426 | 574 | - | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
- | - | (213,998 | ) | (213,998 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
426,160 | $ | 426 | $ | 574 | $ | (213,998 | ) | $ | (212,998 | ) | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
SHOGUN ENERGY, INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
Period from
|
||||
|
September 25, 2009
|
||||
|
(Inception)
|
||||
|
Through December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (213,998 | ) | |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
|
||||
|
cash used in operating activities:
|
||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,171 | |||
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
(2,126 | ) | ||
|
Inventory
|
(5,059 | ) | ||
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
36,145 | |||
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
(183,867 | ) | ||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||
|
Cash paid for fixed assets
|
(35,216 | ) | ||
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
(35,216 | ) | ||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||
|
Sale of common stock
|
1,000 | |||
|
Proceeds from notes payable - bank
|
139,000 | |||
|
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties
|
69,341 | |||
|
Advances to related party
|
(7,112 | ) | ||
|
Advances from related party
|
18,446 | |||
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
220,675 | |||
|
Net increase in cash
|
1,592 | |||
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
- | |||
|
Cash, end of period
|
$ | 1,592 | ||
|
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | - | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Shogun Energy, Inc. (“Shogun” or the “Company” or “we”) was incorporated in the state of South Dakota on September 25, 2009 under the name “Abstract Nationwide Distributing, Inc.” On September 20, 2010, Shogun changed its name from “Abstract Nationwide Distributing, Inc.” to “Shogun Energy, Inc.”
Shogun’s goal is to produce a premium line of energy drinks that are unique and appealing to all demographics, which adds to the allure of its product and the value of its brand. Shogun operates with the four warrior attributes in mind: loyalty to our customers; honor and pride in ourselves to produce an excellent product; confidence to promote our energy drink; and determination to toil long hours in order to perfect our product.
Currently, Shogun’s only product is the Shogun Energy® drink which is available in both regular and sugar-free varieties. Shogun packages its Shogun Energy® drinks in 8.4-ounce and/or 16-ounce aluminum cans.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN
As of December 31, 2009, Shogun has incurred net losses of $213,998, has negative working capital of $247,043, and has an accumulated deficit of $213,998 and stockholders’ deficiency of $212,998. As a result, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern at December 31, 2009.
Management’s plan regarding these matters is to increase sales, resulting in reduced losses and raise additional debt and/or equity financing to cover operating costs as well as its obligations as they become due.
There can be no assurances that funds will be available to the Company when needed or, if available, that such funds would be available under favorable terms. In the event that the Company is unable to generate adequate revenues to cover expenses and cannot obtain additional funds in the near future, the Company may seek protection under bankruptcy laws. To date, management has not considered this alternative, nor does management view it as a likely occurrence, since the Company is progressing with various potential sources of new capital and we anticipate a successful outcome from these activities. However, capital markets remain difficult and there can be no certainty of a successful outcome from these activities.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company’s assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business and does not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-6
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is not recognized on product sales transacted on a test or pilot basis. Instead, receipts from these types of transactions offset marketing expenses.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
We perform a regular review of our customer activity and associated credit risks and do not require collateral from our customers. At December 31, 2009, based on our review of customer activity, we have not recorded any allowance for doubtful accounts.
INVENTORY
We value our inventory at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. We use estimates and judgments regarding the valuation of inventory to properly value inventory. Inventory adjustments are made for the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated realizable value and charged to cost of goods sold in the period in which the facts that give rise to the adjustments become known. Inventory at December 31, 2009 consists of finished goods inventory.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Shogun assesses the carrying value of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment". We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, the following: a significant underperformance to expected historical or projected future operating results, a significant change in the manner of the use of the acquired asset or the strategy for the overall business, or a significant negative industry or economic trend.
MAJOR CUSTOMERS
Three customers accounted for 73% of our accounts receivable at December 31, 2009.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Shogun provides for depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of five years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains or losses on the sale of property and equipment are reflected in the statements of operations.
F-7
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities, the fair value of which, based on management’s estimates, reasonably approximate their book value. The fair value of our notes and advances payable is based on management estimates and reasonably approximates their book value based on their current maturity.
Fair value measurements
ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the amount that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes the following three levels of inputs that may be used:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
In accordance with ASC 820, the following table represents Shogun’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,592
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,592
|
||||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
1,592
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,592
|
||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Notes payable
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
208,341
|
$
|
208,341
|
||||||||
|
Total Liabilities
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
208,341
|
$
|
208,341
|
||||||||
LOSS PER SHARE
We utilize ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. There were no common share equivalents at December 31, 2009.
F-8
INCOME TAXES
We utilize ASC 740 “Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.
The Company made a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established by the guidance. As a result of this review, the Company concluded that at this time there are no uncertain tax positions that would result in tax liability to the Company. There was no cumulative effect on retained earnings as a result of applying the provisions of this guidance.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-28—When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This update provides amendments to ASC Topic 350—Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to perform Step 2 impairment test even if a reporting unit has zero or negative carrying amount. Step 1 tests whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Previously reporting units with zero or negative carrying value passed Step 1 because the fair value was generally greater than zero. Step 2 requires impairment testing and impairment valuation be calculated in between annual tests if an event or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill has been impaired. ASU 2010-28 is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this standard, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice. We do not expect ASU 2010-28 to have any impact on our financial statements.
ASU No. 2010-13 was issued in April 2010, and will clarify the classification of an employee share based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying security trades. This ASU will be effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-13 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, under ASC Topic 605 on Revenue Recognition. This standard provides that the milestone method is a valid application of the proportional performance model for revenue recognition if the milestones are substantive and there is substantive uncertainty about whether the milestones will be achieved. Determining whether a milestone is substantive requires judgment that should be made at the inception of the arrangement. To meet the definition of a substantive milestone, the consideration earned by achieving the milestone (1) would have to be commensurate with either the level of effort required to achieve the milestone or the enhancement in the value of the item delivered, (2) would have to relate solely to past performance, and (3) should be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement. No bifurcation of an individual milestone is allowed and there can be more than one milestone in an arrangement. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of this guidance to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (Topic 855)” (“2010-09”). 2010-09 clarifies the interaction of Accounting Standards Codification 855 “Subsequent Events” (“Topic 855”) with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as well as the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events found in paragraph 855-10-50-4 in Topic 855. This update is effective for annual or interim periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of this guidance to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F-9
In February 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-08 “Technical Corrections to Various Topics” (“2010-08”). 2010-08 represents technical corrections to SEC paragraphs within various sections of the Codification. The Company does not expect the provisions of this guidance to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-05 “Compensation—Stock Compensation—Escrowed Share Arrangements and Presumption of Compensation” (“2010-05”). 2010-05 re-asserts that the Staff of the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC Staff”) has stated the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share represent a compensatory arrangement. 2010-05 further clarifies the criteria required to be met to establish a position different from the SEC Staff’s position. The Company does not believe this pronouncement to have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to ASC Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures that requires additional disclosures about significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 in the fair value measurements, as well as reasons for the transfers. It also clarifies existing disclosures related to the level of disaggregation in the disclosures as well as the required disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The adoption of this portion of the standard which was effective January 1, 2010, has not had a material impact on our financial statements. See Note 2 below for further discussion of this statement and its effect on the financial statements presented herein. Additionally a portion of this standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This portion requires disclosure of purchases, sales, issuance and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. We do not expect this portion of the standard to have any impact on our financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which amends ASC Topic 605— Revenue Recognition, to require companies to allocate revenue in multiple-element arrangements based on an element’s estimated selling price if vendor-specific or other third-party evidence of value is not available. ASU 2009-13 is effective beginning January 1, 2011. We do not expect ASU 2009-13 to have any impact on our financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.
Property and equipment at December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:
|
December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Delivery equipment
|
$
|
15,270
|
||
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
7,733
|
|||
|
Leasehold improvements
|
12,213
|
|||
|
35,216
|
||||
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(1,171
|
)
|
||
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
34,045
|
||
Depreciation expense was $1,171 for the period ended December 31, 2009.
F-10
NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE - BANK
At December 31, 2009, Shogun was indebted to Dacotah Bank pursuant to two promissory notes with an aggregate principal balance of $139,000. The notes mature at various dates through December 21, 2010. Interest rates range from 6.5% to 7.0% per year, with a weighted average rate of 6.7% per year at December 31, 2009. The notes are secured by all of our assets and the personal guarantee of our shareholder.
NOTE 5 – NOTES AND ADVANCES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES
Shawn Knapp, Shogun’s chief executive officer, has funded Shogun on an ongoing basis through loans made by him personally, by his wife and by affiliated entities. The aggregate amounts due to Mr. Knapp, his wife and the affiliated entities were $87,787 at December 31, 2009. The principal is due on demand. Subsequent to September 30, 2010, these advances and loans were converted into notes bearing interest at 5% per year with repayment beginning in June 2011.
NOTE 6 – ADVANCES RECEIVABLE – RELATED PARTY
Shogun has made advances to an entity affiliated with Shawn Knapp. These advances aggregated $7,112 at December 31, 2009.
NOTE 7 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company utilizes ASC 740 “Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between consolidated financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
At December 31, 2009, Shogun has available for U.S federal income tax purposes a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $214,000 expiring in the year 2029 that may be used to offset future taxable income. The deferred tax asset related to the carry forward is approximately $73,000. The Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the earnings history of the Company it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized. Components of deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2010 are presented below.
The provision for income taxes differ from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S statutory rate to losses before income tax expense for the period ended December 31, 2009 as follows:
|
December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
34 | % | ||
|
State and local tax rate
|
0 | % | ||
|
Net operating losses and other tax benefits for which no current benefit is being realized
|
(34 | %) | ||
|
Effective tax rate
|
0.00 | % | ||
F-11
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expenses for the financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences representing deferred tax asset and liabilities result principally from the following:
|
December 31,
|
||||
|
2009
|
||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
$ | 73,000 | ||
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
$ | (73,000 | ) | |
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | ||
Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities at the applicable tax rates. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEASE
Shogun’s corporate offices and distribution facility are both located in Brookings SD. Shogun leases approximately 12,000 square feet of space from Shawn Knapp, Shogun’s chief executive officer, for its entire operation with approximately 2,000 devoted to office space and 10,000 devoted to warehousing, refurbishment, and distribution operations for $4,400 per month. The lease expires December 31, 2015 however Shogun has the option to renew the lease for an additional five year term upon written notice. These facilities are suitable for our purposes and are expected to accommodate our needs for the foreseeable future.
Rent expense was $17,600 for the period ended December 31, 2009.
LITIGATION
To date, Shogun has never been a party to and has never been involved with any litigation. However, in the future, Shogun, like any other business or individual, may become subject to litigation some of which we can control and other litigation that we cannot control. If Shogun were to become involved in any litigation, management would have to assess whether or not such litigation would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to December 31, 2009:
We increased our borrowings from Dacotah Bank by approximately $66,000.
We received additional advances and loan from related parties of approximately $224,000.
The Shareholders and Board of Directors issued a resolution on February 25, 2011 in authorizing a 426.1 to 1 common stock split effective as of December 1, 2010 to increase the then current shares owned, issued and outstanding common stock of Shogun from 1, 000 to 426,160 shares. In addition, the Shareholders and Board of Directors as of the effective date, December 1, 2010 intended to amend the Article of Incorporation to reflect a new par value of $0.001 per share in conjunction with the above referenced stock split.
All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated in the accompanying financial statements.
We received $432,700 in cash as payments for common stock. We also incurred liabilities for leasehold improvements during October and November of 2010 aggregating $100,000. These liabilities were applied as a payment for common stock. We issued an aggregate of 106,540 post-split shares of common stock for cash and liabilities aggregating $532,700.
On December 31, 2010, Shogun entered into a share exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) by and among Shogun, Vanity Event Holdings, Inc., a Delaware publicly held corporation (“Vanity”), Shawn Knapp, the principal shareholder of Shogun (the “Principal Shareholder”) and the other shareholders of Shogun (the “Shogun Shareholders” and collectively with the Principal Shareholder, the “Shareholders”). Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Shareholders exchanged an aggregate of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Shogun in exchange for 500,000 shares of Vanity’s series A preferred stock. Each share of series A preferred stock shall be entitled to 1,604 votes per share and shall be convertible into 1,604 shares of Vanity’s common stock. Upon filing an amendment to Vanity’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of authorized common stock so that there is an adequate amount of shares of authorized common stock for issuance upon conversion of the series A preferred stock, the shares of series A preferred stock will be automatically converted into an aggregate of 802,000,000 shares of Vanity’s common stock. As a result of this transaction, Shogun has become a wholly owned subsidiary of Vanity, and the Shareholders will own approximately 93% of Vanity’s common stock after the series A preferred stock conversion.
F-12