Attached files

file filename
EX-10.8 - EX-10.8 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-10_8.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-23_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-31_2.htm
EX-10.7 - EX-10.7 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-10_7.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-32_1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - NORTECH SYSTEMS INCa2202512zex-31_1.htm

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)    

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                            

NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

Commission file number 0-13257
State of Incorporation: Minnesota
IRS Employer Identification No. 
41-1681094
Executive Offices:
1120 Wayzata Blvd E., Suite 201, Wayzata, MN 55391
Telephone number:
(952) 345-2244

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o    No ý

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

  Large Accelerated Filer o   Accelerated Filer o   Non-accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
  Smaller Reporting Company ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

         The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of $3.75 per share, was $4,571,370 on June 30, 2010.

         Shares of common stock outstanding at March 9, 2011: 2,742,992.

         (The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank.)


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Shareholders' Meeting have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. The Proxy Statement is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year.

        (The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank)

2


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  PAGE

PART I

       

Item 1.

 

Business

 
4-7

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 
7-9

Item 2.

 

Properties

 
9-10

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 
10

PART II

       

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 
10

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 
11-15

Item 8.

 

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 
16-39

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 
40

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures (Including Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting)

 
40

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 
40

PART III

       

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 
41

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 
41

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 
41

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 
42

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 
42

PART IV

       

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

 
42

 

Signatures

 
43

 

Index to Exhibits

 
44

3


Table of Contents

NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

PART I

ITEM 1.        BUSINESS

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

        We are a Minnesota corporation organized in December 1990, filing annual reports, quarterly reports, proxy statements, and other documents with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 340 Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including us, who file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that we file with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

        We make available free of charge through our Internet website (http://www.nortechsys.com) our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Press Releases, and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

GENERAL

        We are an Electronic Manufacturing Service (EMS) contract manufacturing company with our headquarters in Wayzata, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota. We maintain manufacturing facilities in Minnesota including Bemidji, Blue Earth, Milaca, Baxter, and Merrifield as well as Augusta, Wisconsin; Monterrey, Mexico; and as of January 1, 2011, Mankato, Minnesota. We manufacture wire harness cable and printed circuit board assemblies, electronic sub-assemblies, higher level assemblies and complete devices. We provide value added services and technical support including design, testing, prototyping and supply chain management. The vast majority of our revenue is derived from products built to the customer's design specifications.

        We provide a high degree of manufacturing expertise using statistical process controls to ensure product quality, total supply chain solution management, lean manufacturing practices, and the systems necessary to effectively manage the business. This level of sophistication enables us to attract major original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and to expand and diversify our customer base across several markets to avoid the effects of fluctuations within a given industry. Our primary focus is in three major markets: Aerospace and Defense, Medical and Industrial Equipment.

        We believe the EMS industry will provide growth for contract manufacturing as the macro economy improves along with further industry consolidations. Outsourcing remains a strong option for OEMs as they prefer to invest and focus on marketing and product development, and rely on EMS providers for their production and supply chain requirements.

ACQUISITIONS

        On May 4, 2010, we acquired all of the intellectual property and assets, excluding cash and receivables, of Trivirix Corporation, Milaca, MN for $403,000 which consisted of $303,000 in inventory and $100,000 in property and equipment. This operation specializes in design, manufacturing and post-production services of complex electronic and electromechanical medical devices for diagnostic, analytical and other life-science applications. This acquisition expands our capabilities and expertise serving medical electronics manufacturers. The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination and results of operations for Milaca since the date of acquisition are included in the consolidated financial statements.

        On January 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of the EMS business unit of Winland Electronics, Inc., (Winland) a Minnesota corporation. We paid $1,042,389 in cash at closing and will make deferred payments of $250,000 each on July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2011 for substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of their EMS operations. We have also agreed to a six year agreement with Winland to lease office and manufacturing space in Mankato, Minnesota and sublease a portion of it back to them through December 31, 2011.

        In connection with the acquisition, we agreed to purchase a minimum of $2,200,000 of inventory as consumed over the next 24 months. We also entered into an agreement to manufacture certain products related to the production of Winland's proprietary monitoring devices business unit. See note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on this acquisition.

        We continue to investigate potential acquisition opportunities as a normal course of business and a strategy for growth.

4


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENT

        All of our operations fall under the Contract Manufacturing segment within the Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) industry. We strategically direct production between our various manufacturing facilities based on a number of considerations to best meet our customers' requirements. We share resources for sales, marketing, information services, cash and risk management, banking, credit and collections, human resources, payroll, internal control, audit, taxes, SEC reporting and corporate accounting. Our financial information is consolidated and evaluated regularly by the chief decision maker in assessing performance and allocating resources.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

        The EMS industry has evolved into a dynamic, high tech global electronics contract services industry. We continue to expand our capabilities to better meet these changing market requirements. Along with offering technical expertise in our quality processes, design applications and testing, we are also increasing our focus on supplier-managed inventory services and the cost drivers throughout the supply chain. Our international operation and international partnerships allow us to take advantage of lower-cost alternatives for our customers and remain competitive in the marketplace.

        We continue to pursue acquisitions, mergers, and/or joint ventures of companies in the EMS industry to remain competitive, grow our customer base and increase revenues. Our strategic objectives and our history have been based on both organic and acquired growth.

        Our quality systems and processes are based on ISO standards with all facilities certified to the latest version of the ISO 9001 and/or AS 9100 Aerospace standards. We also have ISO 13485 certification which recognizes our quality management systems applicable to contract design, manufacture and repair of assemblies for the medical industry. Our Milaca operation is an FDA registered facility. We believe these certifications and registrations benefit our customer base and increase our chances of attracting new business opportunities.

        We are committed to quality, cost effectiveness and responsiveness to customer requirements. To achieve these objectives we have invested in ROHS (lead free) processing, equipment, plant capacity studies, people, ERP systems, and lean manufacturing and supply chain management techniques at our facilities. We are committed to continuous improvement in order to provide competitive and comprehensive manufacturing service solutions to our customers. We will maintain a diversified customer base, and expand into other capabilities and services when they fit our core competencies and strategic vision.

MARKETING

        We concentrate our marketing efforts in the Aerospace and Defense, Medical and Industrial Equipment markets. Our marketing strategy emphasizes the breadth of our manufacturing, supply chain and engineering services and reflects the complete turnkey solution for meeting our customers' current and future requirements.

        Our customer emphasis continues to be on mature companies, which require a contract manufacturer with a high degree of manufacturing and quality sophistication, including statistical process control (SPC), statistical quality control (SQC), International Standards Organization (ISO), Military Specifications (Mill Spec), Aerospace Systems 9100 (AS) and FDA facility registration. We continue efforts to penetrate our existing customer base and expand new market opportunities with participation in industry publications and selected trade shows. We target customers who value proven manufacturing performance, design and application engineering expertise and who value the flexibility to manage the supply chain of a high mix of products and services. We market our services through our in-house sales force and independent manufacturers' representatives.

SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS

        We currently purchase the majority of our electronic components directly from electronic component manufacturers and large electronic distributors. On occasion some of our components may be placed on a stringent allocation basis; however, we are not experiencing any major material purchasing or availability problems.

PATENTS AND LICENSES

        We are not presently dependent on a proprietary product requiring licensing, patent, copyright or trademark protection. There are no revenues derived from a service-related business for which patents, licenses,

5


Table of Contents


copyrights and trademark protection are necessary for successful operations.

COMPETITION

        The contract manufacturing EMS industry's competitive makeup includes small closely held contract manufacturing companies, large global full-service contract manufacturers, company-owned in-house manufacturing facilities and foreign contract manufacturers. We do not believe that the small closely held operations pose a significant competitive threat in the markets and customers we serve, as they generally do not have the complete manufacturing services or capabilities required by our target customers. We do believe the larger global full service and foreign manufacturers do provide a substantial competitive environment as their technical support has improved greatly along with their ability to be more responsive to engineering and schedule changes. We continue to see opportunities with OEM companies that have their own in-house electronic manufacturing capabilities as they evaluate their internal costs and investments against outsourcing to contract manufacturers. The willingness of foreign manufacturers to "stock" finished product at warehouse locations in the United States is another of their competitive advantages, however, their inability to react to engineering, product or schedule changes is a disadvantage and plays into our strength. To mitigate foreign competition, we operate a manufacturing operation in Mexico and have other sourcing solutions to support our customers with a "Low Cost" supply chain solution.

MAJOR CUSTOMERS

        Two divisions of General Electric, Co. (G.E.) accounted for 10% or more of our net sales during the past two years. G.E.'s Medical Division accounted for 19% and 13% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. G.E.'s Transportation Division accounted for 8% and 12% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Together, G.E.'s Medical and Transportation Divisions accounted for 27% and 25% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Accounts receivable from G.E.'s Medical and Transportation Divisions at December 31, 2010 and 2009 represented 14% and 16% of total accounts receivable, respectively.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

        We perform research and development for customers on an as requested and program basis for development of conceptual engineering and design activities prior to manufacturing the products. We did not expend significant dollars in 2010 or 2009 on company-sponsored product research and development.

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW COMPLIANCE

        We believe that our manufacturing facilities are currently operating under compliance with local, state, and federal environmental laws. We have incurred, and plan to continue incurring, the necessary expenditures for compliance with applicable laws. Any environmental-oriented equipment is capitalized and depreciated over a seven-year period. The annualized depreciation expense for this type of environmental equipment is insignificant.

EMPLOYEES

        We have 667 full-time and 42 part-time/temporary employees as of December 31, 2010. Manufacturing personnel, including direct, indirect support and sales functions, comprise 681 employees, while general administrative employees total 28. At December 31, 2009 we had 515 full-time and 23 part-time/temporary employees.

FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES

        We have a leased manufacturing facility in Monterrey, Mexico with approximately $192,000 in long-term assets at December 31, 2010. Export sales represent 6% and 4% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 7, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements in other reports filed with the SEC, in materials delivered to stockholders and in press releases. Such statements generally will be accompanied by words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "possible," "potential," "predict," "project," or other similar words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Although we believe these forward-looking statements are

6


Table of Contents


reasonable, they are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions, any or all of which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

    Volatility in the marketplace which may affect market supply and demand of our products;

    Increased competition;

    Changes in the reliability and efficiency of our operating facilities or those of third parties;

    Risks related to availability of labor;

    Increase in certain raw material costs such as copper and oil;

    Commodity and Energy cost instability;

    General economic, financial and business conditions that could affect our financial condition and results of operations:

    Successful integration of recent acquisitions

        The factors identified above are believed to be important factors (but not necessarily all of the important factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us. Discussion of these factors is also incorporated in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors", and should be considered an integral part of Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed herein could also have material adverse effects on forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K are expressly qualified in their entirety by the forgoing cautionary statements. We undertake no obligations to update publicly any forward-looking statement (or its associated cautionary language) whether as a result of new information or future events.

ITEM 1A.        RISK FACTORS

        In evaluating us as a company, careful consideration should be given to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each of these risk factors could adversely affect our business, operating results and/or financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock. In addition to the following disclosures, please refer to the other information contained in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes.

The economic conditions in the United States and around the world could adversely affect our financial results.

        Demand for our products and services depends upon worldwide economic conditions, including but not limited to overall economic growth rates, construction, consumer spending, financing availability, employment rates, interest rates, inflation, consumer confidence, defense spending levels, and the profits, capital spending, and liquidity of industrial companies.

We operate in the highly competitive EMS industry.

        We compete against many EMS companies. The larger global competitors have more resources and greater economies of scale. We also compete with OEM in-house operations that are continually evaluating manufacturing products internally against the advantages of outsourcing. We may also be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to price when compared to manufacturers with excess capacity, lower cost structures and availability of lower cost labor.

        The availability of excess manufacturing capacity of our competitors also creates competitive pressure on price and winning new business. We must continue to provide a quality product, be responsive and flexible to customers' requirements, and deliver to customers' expectations. Our lack of execution could have an adverse effect on our operations.

A large percentage of our sales have been made to a small number of customers, and the loss of a major customer, if not replaced, would adversely affect us.

        G.E.'s Medical and Transportation Divisions accounted for 27% and 25% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We are dependent on suppliers for electronic components and may experience shortages, extended lead times, cost premiums and shipment delays that would adversely affect our customers and us.

        We purchase raw materials, commodities and components for use in our production. Increased costs of these materials could have an adverse effect on our production costs if we are unable to pass along price increases or reduce the other cost of goods produced through cost improvement initiatives. Fuel and energy

7


Table of Contents


cost increases could also adversely affect our freight and operating costs. Due to customer specifications and requirements, we are dependent on suppliers to provide critical electronic components and materials for our operations that could result in shortages of some of the electronic components needed for their production. Component shortages may result in expedited freight, overtime premiums and increased component costs. In addition to the financial impact on operations from lost revenue and increased cost, there could potentially be harm to our customer relationships.

Our customers cancel orders, change order quantity, timing and specifications that if not managed would have an adverse affect on inventory carrying costs.

        We do face, through the normal course of business, customer cancellations and rescheduled orders and are not always successful in recovering the costs of such cancellations or rescheduling. In addition, excess and obsolete inventory losses as a result of customer order changes, cancellations, product changes and contract termination could have an adverse effect on our operations. We estimate and reserve for any known or potential impact from these possibilities.

The manufacture and sale of our products carries potential risk for product liability claims.

        We represent and warrant the goods and services we deliver are free from defects in material and workmanship for one year from ship date. We make no other guarantees or warranties, expressed or implied, of any nature whatsoever as to the goods including without limitation, warranties to merchantability, fit for a particular purpose, non-infringement of patent or the like unless agreed upon in writing. If a product liability claim results in our being liable and the amount is in excess of our insurance coverage or there is no insurance coverage for the claim then it could have an adverse effect on our business and financial position.

We depend heavily on our people and may from time to time have difficulty attracting and retaining skilled employees.

        Our operations depend upon the continued contributions of our key management, marketing, technical, financial, accounting, product development engineers, sales people and operational personnel. We also believe that our continued success will depend upon our ability to attract, retain and develop highly skilled managerial and technical resources within the highly competitive EMS industry. Not being able to attract or retain these employees could have a material adverse effect on revenues and earnings.

Operating in foreign countries exposes our operations to risks that could adversely affect our operating results.

        We've operated a manufacturing facility in Mexico since 2002. Our operation there is subject to risks that could adversely impact our financial results, such as economic or political volatility, crime, severe weather, employee turnover, staffing, managing personnel in diverse culture, labor instability, transportation delays, and foreign currency fluctuations.

Non-compliance with environmental laws may result in restrictions and could adversely affect operations.

        Our operations are regulated under a number of federal, state, and foreign environmental and safety laws and regulations that govern the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water, as well as the handling, storage, and disposal of such materials. These laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; as well as analogous state and foreign laws. Compliance with these environmental laws is a major consideration for us due to our manufacturing processes and materials. It is possible we may be subject to potential financial liability for costs associated with the investigation and remediation at our sites; this may have an adverse effect on operations. We have not incurred significant costs related to compliance with environmental laws and regulations and we believe that our operations comply with all applicable environmental laws.

        Environmental laws could also become more stringent over time, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with violation. We operate in environmentally sensitive locations and are subject to potentially conflicting and changing regulatory agendas of political, business, and environmental groups. Changes or restrictions on discharge limits; emissions levels; or material storage, handling, or disposal might require a high level of unplanned capital investment or relocation. It is possible that environmental compliance costs and penalties from new or existing regulations may harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

8


Table of Contents


We may be subject to risks associated with our acquisitions, and the risks could adversely affect our operating results.

        Our strategy is to grow our business organically and through acquisitions, alliances and joint venture arrangements. We will continue to pursue and acquire additional businesses in the EMS industry that fit our long-term objectives for growth and profitability. The success of our acquisitions will depend on our ability to integrate the new operations with the existing operations.

If we fail to comply with the covenants contained in our revolving credit facility we may be unable to secure additional financing and repayment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness may be accelerated.

        Our revolving credit facility and debt agreements contain financial and operating covenants with which we must comply. As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with these covenants. However, our continued compliance with these covenants is dependent on our financial results, which are subject to fluctuation as described elsewhere in these risk factors. If we fail to comply with the covenants in the future or if our lender does not agree to waive any future non-compliance, we may be unable to borrow funds and any outstanding indebtedness could become immediately due and payable, which could materially harm our business.

We are dependent on our management information systems for order, inventory and production management, financial reporting, communications and other functions. If our information systems fail or experience major interruptions, our business and our financial results could be adversely affected.

        We rely on our management information systems to effectively manage our operational and financial functions. Our computer systems, Internet web sites, telecommunications, and data networks are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from power loss, natural disasters and attacks from viruses or hackers. These types of system failures or interruption could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business may be impacted by natural disasters.

        Tornadoes, blizzards and other natural disasters could negatively impact our business and supply chain. In countries that we rely on for operations and materials, such as Mexico, China and Thailand, potential natural disasters could disrupt our manufacturing operations, reduce demand for our customers' products and increase supply chain costs.

ITEM 2.        PROPERTIES

ADMINISTRATION

        Our Corporate Headquarters consists of approximately 5,000 square feet located in Wayzata, Minnesota, a western suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Corporate Headquarters has a lease with a five-year term that expires on July 31, 2015. A portion of the Bemidji facility is used for corporate financial and information systems shared services.

MANUFACTURING FACILITIES

        Our manufacturing facilities as described below are in good operating condition and are suitable for our needs. We believe our overall productive capacity is sufficient to handle our foreseeable manufacturing needs and customer requirements.

        We own our Bemidji, Minnesota facility consisting of eight acres of land and a building of approximately 69,000 square feet consisting of 56,000 square feet designated for manufacturing space, and the remaining space is used for offices.

        In November 2009, we sold a 14,000 square foot building in Fairmont, Minnesota. We still own two buildings in Fairmont which together contain approximately 37,000 square feet. Both buildings are held for sale.

        We own a building in Blue Earth, Minnesota, of approximately 140,000 square feet consisting of 92,000 square feet designated for manufacturing space. The remaining space is being used for offices and warehouse.

        We own a building in Merrifield, Minnesota, of approximately 46,000 square feet consisting of 34,000 square feet designated for manufacturing; the remaining space is used for offices and warehouse.

        In Baxter, Minnesota we lease 9,000 square feet in one building and 8,000 square feet in another building. Together the buildings contain 13,000 square feet designated for electronic board repair of medical equipment with the remaining space being used for offices and warehouse. We are leasing these buildings on a month-to-month basis.

        We own our Augusta, Wisconsin facility consisting of five acres of land and a building of approximately 20,000 square feet. 15,000 square feet are designated for manufacturing space, and the remaining space is used for offices.

9


Table of Contents

        We lease a 30,000 square foot building in Monterrey, Mexico consisting of 29,000 square feet designated for manufacturing space with the remaining space being used for offices. The lease expires on June 30, 2011 at which point we expect to renew.

        In Garner, Iowa we lease a 38,000 square foot building. The lease expires on June 30, 2011. In connection with the restructuring activities during 2009, this facility was sub-leased on August 26, 2009 through the remaining term of the lease.

        We lease a 20,000 square foot building in Milaca, Minnesota consisting of 15,000 square feet designated for manufacturing space with the remaining space being used for offices. The lease expires on July 31, 2011 at which point we intend to renew.

        As part of the acquisition of the EMS business unit of Winland in January 2011, we agreed to lease a 58,000 square foot building consisting of 43,000 square feet designated for manufacturing and the remaining space used for offices. The lease expires on January 1, 2017 at which point we have the right of first refusal and an option to purchase the building. A portion of this facility will be subleased back to Winland through December 31, 2011.

ITEM 3.        LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        From time to time, we are involved in ordinary, routine or regulatory legal proceedings incidental to the business. When a loss is deemed probable and reasonably estimable an amount is recorded in our financial statements. We currently are not a party to any material legal proceeding.


PART II

ITEM 5.        MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        As of March 3, 2011, there were 752 shareholders of record. Our stock is listed on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System ("NASDAQ") Small Cap Market under the symbol "NSYS". We intend to invest our profits into the growth of our operations and, therefore, do not plan to pay out dividends to shareholders in the foreseeable future. We did not declare or pay a cash dividend in 2010 or 2009. Future dividend policy and payments, if any, will depend upon earnings and our financial condition, our need for funds, any limitations on payments of dividends present in our current or future debt agreements, and other factors.

        Stock price comparisons (NASDAQ):

During the Three Months Ended
  Low   High  
 

March 31, 2010

  $ 3.07   $ 3.77  
 

June 30, 2010

  $ 3.32   $ 3.99  
 

September 30, 2010

  $ 3.10   $ 3.75  
 

December 31, 2010

  $ 3.32   $ 4.62  
 

March 31, 2009

 
$

2.80
 
$

4.69
 
 

June 30, 2009

  $ 2.50   $ 3.53  
 

September 30, 2009

  $ 2.40   $ 3.00  
 

December 31, 2009

  $ 2.74   $ 3.29  

        Sales of Unregistered Securities:

        We did not have any unregistered sales of equity securities in 2010.

        Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers:

        We did not make any purchases of our equity securities in 2010.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        Certain information with respect to our equity compensation plans are contained in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

10


Table of Contents

ITEM 7.        MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

        We are a Wayzata, Minnesota based full-service EMS contract manufacturer of wire and cable assemblies, printed circuit board assemblies, higher-level assemblies and box builds for a wide range of industries. We serve three major markets within the EMS industry: Aerospace and Defense, Medical, and the Industrial market which includes industrial equipment, transportation, vision, agriculture, oil and gas. In Minnesota, we have facilities in Baxter, Bemidji, Blue Earth, Fairmont, Merrifield, Milaca and Wayzata. We also have facilities in Augusta, Wisconsin; Monterrey, Mexico; and as of January 1, 2011, Mankato, Minnesota.

        The vast majority of our revenue is derived from products that are built to the customer's design specifications and consist of a wide range of simple to highly complex manufacturing processes. During 2010, we continued our supply chain and lean manufacturing initiatives designed to reduce costs, improve asset utilization and increase responsiveness to customers. Our initiatives focused on improving our ability to promise based on our capabilities and scheduling as well as improving our manufacturing processes and yields by doing it right the first time. Our goal is to expand and diversify our customer base by focusing on sales and marketing efforts that fit our value-added service strategy. Our Mexico operation allows for medium volume and mix with lower cost production alternatives when the opportunities are presented. We also benefit from our relationships with Asian manufacturers and suppliers that allow us to meet higher volume, lower mix and lower cost customer requirements when lead times and product stability are not as critical.

        In the first half of 2010 we saw our revenues stabilize and customer confidence improve. Our 90 day backlog increased steadily leading to a double digit revenue growth for the year.

        Our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $99.8 million, an increase of 25% compared to 2009. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 11.5% and 7.2% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The cost reduction and capacity consolidation efforts which were completed in third quarter 2009, account for the significant improvements in gross profit performance in 2010. Our net income in 2010 was $506,766 or $0.18 per diluted common share compared to net loss of $3,835,041 or $1.40 per diluted common share in 2009.

        We continued to focus on cash management and cash conservation throughout 2010. Cash from Operating Activities was $2,890,000 for the year. On January 6, 2011 we entered into the first amendment to the third amended and restated credit and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank (WFB) which provides a $13.5 million line of credit through May 31, 2013. We believe our financing arrangements and cash flows provided by operations will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs through the foreseeable future.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

        Our significant accounting policies and estimates are summarized in the footnotes to our annual consolidated financial statements. Some of the accounting policies require us to exercise significant judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. Such judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on historical experience, known trends in the industry, terms of existing contracts and other information from outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Certain of the most critical estimates that require significant judgment are as follows:

Revenue Recognition:

        We recognize revenue upon shipment of manufactured products to customers, when title has passed, all contractual obligations have been satisfied and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We also provide engineering services separate from the manufacture of a product. Revenue for engineering services is recognized upon completion of the engineering process, providing standalone fair value to our customers. Our engineering services are short-term in nature. In addition, we have another separate source of revenue that comes from short-term repair services, which are recognized upon completion of the repairs, and the repaired products are shipped back to the customer. Shipping and handling costs charged to our customers are included in net sales, while the corresponding shipping expenses are included in cost of goods sold.

11


Table of Contents

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts:

        When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze accounts receivable, historical write-offs of bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount estimated to be sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses resulting from collecting less than full payment on outstanding accounts receivable. A considerable amount of judgment is required when assessing the realizability of accounts receivable, including assessing the probability of collection and the current credit-worthiness of each customer. If the financial condition of our customers was to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, an additional provision for uncollectible accounts may be required. We have historically not experienced significant bad debts expense and believe the reserve is adequate for any exposure to loss in the December 31, 2010 accounts receivable.

Inventory Reserves:

        Inventory reserves are maintained for the estimated value of the inventory that may have a lower value than stated or quantities in excess of future production needs. We have an evaluation process that is used to assess the value of the inventory that is slow moving, excess or obsolete on a quarterly basis. We evaluate our inventory based on current usage and the latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from our customers. We believe the total reserve at December 31, 2010 is adequate.

Long-Lived and Intangible Asset Impairment:

        We evaluate long-lived assets and intangible assets with finite lives for impairment, as well as the related amortization periods, to determine whether adjustments to these amounts or useful lives are required based on current events and circumstances. The evaluation is based on our projection of the undiscounted future operating cash flows of the underlying assets. To the extent such projections indicate that future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying amounts of related assets, a charge might be required to reduce the carrying amount to equal estimated fair value. In 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $56,000 on a building held for sale. In connection with the closing of two facilities in 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $502,000 on certain property and equipment that were no longer being used in operations.

Valuation Allowance:

        We record valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets when necessary. Realization of deferred tax assets (such as net operating loss carry forwards) is dependent on future taxable earnings and therefore uncertain. At least quarterly, we assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance against these assets, thereby increasing income tax expense or decreasing the income tax benefit in the period the determination is made. As of December 31, 2010 we expect to recover our deferred tax assets in their entirety, and thus no valuation allowance was deemed necessary.

        Based on a critical assessment of our accounting estimates and the underlying judgments and uncertainties of those estimates, we believe that our consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations. This is not to suggest that other general risk factors, such as changes in worldwide economic conditions, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in materials costs, performance of acquired businesses and others, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.

        No matters have come to our attention since December 31, 2010 that would cause the estimates included in the consolidated financial statements to change materially.

12


Table of Contents

OPERATING RESULTS

        The following table presents statement of operations data as percentages of net sales for the indicated year:

 
  2010   2009  

Net Sales

    100.00 %   100.00 %

Cost of Goods Sold

    88.50     92.80  
           

Gross Profit

    11.50     7.20  

Selling Expenses

   
3.10
   
5.60
 

General and Administrative Expenses

    7.00     7.30  

Restructuring Charges

    0.10     1.20  
           

Income (Loss) from Operations

   
1.30
   
(6.90

)

Other Expenses, Net

    0.40     0.90  

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

    0.40     (3.00 )
           

Net Income (Loss)

   
0.50

%
 
(4.80

)%
           

Net sales:

        For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had net sales of $99.8 million and $79.9 million, respectively, an increase of 25%. The Milaca medical device operation acquired in May 2010 accounted for $3.6 million of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010. Net sales by our major EMS industry markets for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 
  Year Ended
December 31
   
 
(in thousands)
  2010
$
  2009
$
  %
Change
 

Aerospace and Defense

    16,152     26,515     (39 )

Medical

    29,329     17,493     68  

Industrial

    54,339     35,932     51  
               

Total Net Sales

    99,820     79,940     25  
               

        We saw sales to our Aerospace and Defense customers decline 39% due to the end of major contracts and the timing of new replacement business. Sales to our Medical and Industrial customers increased 68% and 51%, respectively as the overall economy stabilized and we began to see more new business opportunities and improved buying confidence from our existing customer base.

Backlog:

        Our 90 day backlog as of December 31, 2010 was approximately $18.5 million compared to approximately $17.7 million on December 31, 2009. Our backlog consists of firm purchase orders and we expect a major portion of the current 90 day backlog to be realized as revenue during the following quarter.

 
  Backlog as of the Year Ended    
 
(in thousands)
  December 31
2010
  December 31
2009
  %
Change
 

Aerospace and Defense

  $ 4,453   $ 4,494     (1 )

Medical

    4,216     3,638     16  

Industrial

    9,813     9,614     2  
               

Total Backlog

  $ 18,482   $ 17,746     4  
               

Gross Profit:

        For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had gross profit of $11.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 11.5% and 7.2% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The year over year increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was a direct result of the increase in sales volume in 2010 and the restructuring which occurred in the third quarter of 2009 resulting in better utilization of our fixed cost structure.

Selling:

        Selling expenses were $3.1 million or 3.1% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $4.4 million or 5.6% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009. The majority of the $1.3 million decrease was due to approximately $0.7 million less commissions and $0.6 million in cost reductions.

General and Administrative:

        General and administrative expenses were $7.0 million or 7.0% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $5.9 million or 7.3% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009. The 2010 increase of $1.1 million is mainly attributed to the reversal of wage decreases and the re-instatement of merit increases, 401K matching and incentive programs on July 1, 2010.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges:

        We recognized $0.1 million and $1.0 million of restructuring and impairment charges in Income (Loss) from Operations during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2010 costs relate to the impairment of a Fairmont building that is held for

13


Table of Contents


sale. The 2009 restructuring and impairment costs included $0.5 million in non-cash impairment charges for property and equipment that are no longer being used in operations and $0.5 million related to employee benefits, contract termination costs, and other expenses incurred to relocate production. The 2009 restructuring and impairment charges were the result of the facility closings and consolidation efforts taken throughout the year to better align our capacity to current customer demand levels.

Other Income (Expense):

        Other expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Interest expense and foreign exchange transaction losses make up the majority of the other expense in 2010.

Income Taxes:

        Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $375,000. Due to the loss incurred in 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 was 42.5% compared to 38.4% in fiscal 2009. The increase in effective tax rate from 2009 to 2010 relates primarily to the true-up of our net operating loss (NOL) carryback which resulted in additional tax expense of approximately $103,000 partially offset by state and federal research credits.

Net Income (Loss):

        Our net income in 2010 was $506,766 or $0.18 per diluted common share compared to net loss of $3,835,041 or $1.40 per diluted common share in 2009. We returned to profitability in 2010 primarily due to increased sales and the cost reductions experienced from the prior year restructuring activities.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

        We believe that our existing financing arrangements and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investments, and debt repayments for the foreseeable future.

Credit Facility:

        On May 27, 2010 we entered into a third amended and restated credit and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank which provides a $12 million line of credit through May 31, 2013 and a real estate note maturing on May 31, 2012. On January 6, 2011, we entered into the first amendment to this agreement which provides a $13.5 million line of credit through May 31, 2013, a new $475,000 equipment term loan tied to equipment purchased in the recent acquisition announced January 3, 2011 and a new term loan of up to $1.0 million for capital expenditures to be made in 2011. Under the new agreement, both the line of credit and real estate term note are subject to variations in the LIBOR rate. Advances on our line of credit will bear interest at three-month LIBOR + 4.00% (4.30% at December 31, 2010). The weighted-average interest rate on our line of credit and other long-term debt was 4.63% and 5.04%, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        The line of credit and other installment debt with WFB contain certain covenants which, among other things, require us to adhere to regular reporting requirements, abide by annual shareholder dividend limitations, maintain certain financial performance, and limit the amount of annual capital expenditures. The availability under the line is subject to borrowing base requirements, and advances are at the discretion of the lender. The line is secured by substantially all of our assets. This commitment is summarized as described below:

Other Commercial Commitment
  Total
Amount
Committed
  Outstanding at
December 31, 2010
  Date of
Expiration
 

Line of credit

  $ 13,500,000   $ 5,615,121     May 31, 2013  

        As of December 31, 2010 we have net unused availability under our line of credit agreement of approximately $5.2 million as supported by our borrowing base. Under the terms of our new agreement, our unused availability increased to $6.5 million on January 6, 2011.

14


Table of Contents

Cash Flow:

 
  December 31  
 
  2010   2009  

Cash flows provided by (used in):

             

Operating activities

  $ 2,890,254   $ (853,495 )

Investing activities

    (1,029,599 )   (76,609 )

Financing activities

    (1,876,092 )   371,860  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

    638     584  
           

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

  $ (14,799 ) $ (557,660 )
           

        On December 31, 2010, we had working capital of approximately $13.1 million as compared to $13.2 million at the end of 2009. During 2010, we generated approximately $2.9 million of cash flow from operating activities. The cash flow from operations is primarily due to net income of $0.5 million plus $2.1 million of noncash charges, including depreciation, amortization, property and equipment impairment charges, restructuring charges, the change in deferred taxes and other miscellaneous noncash expenses. The cash flow from operating assets and liabilities was $0.3 million. This was driven by a decrease in income taxes receivable of $2.1 million and an increase in accounts payable and accruals of $1.8 million offset in part by a $3.5 million increase in accounts receivable.

        Our net cash used in investing activities of $1.0 million is due to $0.6 million of capital equipment purchases and $0.4 million for the acquisition in May 2010. Net cash used in financing activities of $1.9 million consisted of $2.0 million reduction of long-term debt offset by $0.1 million line of credit increase.

15


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

ITEM 8.        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

        (The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank.)

16


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 11, 2011

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

17


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

ASSETS
  2010   2009  

CURRENT ASSETS

             
 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

  $ 230,582   $ 245,381  
 

Accounts Receivable, Less Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

    15,562,277     12,021,378  
 

Inventories

    16,108,773     15,806,669  
 

Prepaid Expenses

    596,363     542,643  
 

Income Taxes Receivable

    376,001     2,515,906  
 

Deferred Income Taxes

    594,000     753,000  
           
   

Total Current Assets

    33,467,996     31,884,977  
           

Property and Equipment, Net

   
7,157,543
   
8,239,161
 

Finite Life Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization

    202,150     343,549  

Deferred Income Taxes

    219,000     348,000  

Other Assets

    514,235     313,518  
           
   

Total Assets

  $ 41,560,924   $ 41,129,205  
           

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

18


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHNOLDERS' EQUITY
  2010   2009  

CURRENT LIABILITIES

             
 

Line of Credit

  $ 5,615,121   $ 5,490,607  
 

Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt

    841,760     1,013,920  
 

Accounts Payable

    10,727,907     9,050,684  
 

Accrued Payroll and Commissions

    2,584,108     1,449,528  
 

Accrued Health and Dental Claims

    35,000     310,000  
 

Other Accrued Liabilities

    599,655     1,354,438  
           
   

Total Current Liabilities

    20,403,551     18,669,177  
           

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

             
 

Long-Term Debt (Net of Current Maturities)

    1,731,318     3,572,264  
 

Other Long-Term Liabilities

    137,236     160,912  
           
   

Total Long-Term Liabilities

    1,868,554     3,733,176  
           
     

Total Liabilities

    22,272,105     22,402,353  
           

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

             
 

Preferred Stock, $1 par value; 1,000,000 Shares Authorized; 250,000 Shares Issued and Outstanding

    250,000     250,000  
 

Common Stock—$0.01 par value; 9,000,000 Shares Authorized; 2,742,992 and 2,738,992 Shares Issued and Outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

    27,430     27,390  
 

Additional Paid-In Capital

    15,698,348     15,654,160  
 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

    (62,936 )   (73,909 )
 

Retained Earnings

    3,375,977     2,869,211  
           
   

Total Shareholders' Equity

    19,288,819     18,726,852  
           
     

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

  $ 41,560,924   $ 41,129,205  
           

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

19


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
  2010   2009  

Net Sales

  $ 99,820,069   $ 79,939,839  

Cost of Goods Sold

    88,389,803     74,141,269  
           

Gross Profit

    11,430,266     5,798,570  
           

Operating Expenses:

             
 

Selling Expenses

    3,120,202     4,449,184  
 

General and Administrative Expenses

    7,024,087     5,865,380  
 

Restructuring Charges

    55,786     967,991  
           
   

Total Operating Expenses

    10,200,075     11,282,555  
           

Income (Loss) From Operations

    1,230,191     (5,483,985 )
           

Other Income (Expense)

             
 

Miscellaneous Income (Expense)

    80,698     (225,784 )
 

Interest Expense

    (429,123 )   (512,272 )
           
   

Total Other Expense

    (348,425 )   (738,056 )
           

Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes

    881,766     (6,222,041 )

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

    375,000     (2,387,000 )
           

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 506,766   $ (3,835,041 )
           

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share:

             

Basic and Diluted

 
$

0.18
 
$

(1.40

)
           

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding

    2,742,389     2,738,982  
           

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

20


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
  Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained Earnings   Total
Shareholders'
Equity
 

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2008

  $ 250,000   $ 27,390   $ 15,525,981   $ (89,598 ) $ 6,704,252   $ 22,418,025  
 

Net loss

                    (3,835,041 )   (3,835,041 )
 

Issuance of stock upon exercise of stock options

            132             132  
 

Compensation on stock-based awards

            128,047             128,047  
 

Translation gain, net of tax

                15,689         15,689  
                           

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2009

    250,000     27,390     15,654,160     (73,909 )   2,869,211     18,726,852  
 

Net income

                    506,766     506,766  
 

Issuance of stock upon exercise of stock options

        40     12,460             12,500  
 

Compensation on stock-based awards

            31,728             31,728  
 

Translation gain, net of tax

                10,973         10,973  
                           

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2010

  $ 250,000   $ 27,430   $ 15,698,348   $ (62,936 ) $ 3,375,977   $ 19,288,819  
                           

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

21


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

 
  2010   2009  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Net income (Loss)

  $ 506,766   $ (3,835,041 )
 

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:

             
   

Depreciation

    1,554,577     1,773,917  
   

Amortization

    141,399     150,121  
   

Compensation on Stock-Based Awards

    31,728     128,047  
   

Interest on Swap Valuation

    (27,772 )   (18,893 )
   

Restructuring Charges

        466,455  
   

Fixed Asset Impairment

    55,786     501,536  
   

Deferred Income Taxes

    288,000     188,000  
   

Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment

    901     4,955  
   

Foreign Currency Transaction Loss

    8,333     10,131  
 

Changes in Current Operating Items, Net of Effects of Business Acquisition

             
   

Accounts Receivable

    (3,532,471 )   1,146,371  
   

Inventories

    865     4,896,475  
   

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

    (53,207 )   203,114  
   

Income Taxes Receivable

    2,139,543     (2,095,733 )
   

Accounts Payable

    1,674,954     (1,696,872 )
   

Accrued Payroll and Commissions

    1,127,119     (1,973,657 )
   

Accrued Health and Dental Claims

    (275,000 )   (136,102 )
   

Other Accrued Liabilities

    (751,267 )   (566,319 )
           
     

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

    2,890,254     (853,495 )
           

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Proceeds from Sale of Property and Equipment

        176,350  
 

Restricted Cash

        427,500  
 

Business Acquisition

    (402,969 )    
 

Purchases of Property and Equipment

    (626,630 )   (680,459 )
           
     

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

    (1,029,599 )   (76,609 )
           

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Net Borrowings on Line of Credit

    124,514     1,123,045  
 

Proceeds from Long-Term Debt

        616,397  
 

Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt

    (2,013,106 )   (1,367,714 )
 

Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock

    12,500     132  
           
     

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

    (1,876,092 )   371,860  
           

Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

    638     584  
           

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   
(14,799

)
 
(557,660

)

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Beginning of Year

    245,381     803,041  
           

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—END OF YEAR

 
$

230,582
 
$

245,381
 
           

22


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

        We manufacture wire harnesses, cables and electromechanical assemblies, printed circuit boards and higher-level assemblies for a wide range of commercial and defense industries. We provide a full "turn-key" contract manufacturing service to our customers. All products are built to the customer's design specifications. Products are sold to customers both domestically and internationally. We also provide engineering services separate from the manufacture of a product and repair service on circuit boards used in machines in the medical industry.

        Our manufacturing facilities are located in Bemidji, Blue Earth, Merrifield, Milaca and Baxter, Minnesota as well as Augusta, Wisconsin; Monterrey, Mexico; and as of January 1, 2011, Mankato, Minnesota.

        A summary of our significant accounting policies follows:

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiary, Manufacturing Assembly Solutions of Monterrey, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the valuation allowance for inventories, allowance for doubtful accounts and realizability of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        For purposes of reporting cash flows, we consider cash equivalents to be short-term, highly liquid interest-bearing accounts readily convertible to cash and whose original maturity is three months or less.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        We grant credit to customers in the normal course of business. Accounts receivable are unsecured and are presented net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The allowance for uncollectible accounts was $86,000 and $138,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We determine our allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, our previous loss history, the customers' current ability to pay their obligations to us, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. We write-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for uncollectible accounts.

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (based on the lower of replacement cost or net realizable value). Costs include material, labor, and overhead required in the warehousing and production of our products. Inventory reserves are maintained for the estimated value of the inventory that may have a lower value than stated or quantities in excess of future production needs.

        Inventories are as follows:

 
  2010   2009  

Raw materials

  $ 11,277,741   $ 11,137,853  

Work in process

    3,477,236     3,304,725  

Finished goods

    2,395,843     2,459,521  

Reserves

    (1,042,047 )   (1,095,430 )
           

Total

  $ 16,108,773   $ 15,806,669  
           

23


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1  NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Property, Equipment and Depreciation

        Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Additions, improvements and major renewals are capitalized, while maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated use lives or their remaining lease terms. All other property and equipment are depreciated by the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, as follows:

Buildings

  39 Years

Leasehold improvements

  3-7 Years

Manufacturing equipment

  5-7 Years

Office and other equipment

  3-7 Years

        Property and equipment at December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 
  2010   2009  

Land

  $ 260,000   $ 272,500  

Building and Leasehold Improvements

    6,316,133     6,543,066  

Manufacturing Equipment

    11,816,653     11,751,996  

Office and Other Equipment

    3,523,526     3,827,542  

Accumulated Depreciation

    (14,758,769 )   (14,155,943 )
           
 

Net Property and Equipment

  $ 7,157,543   $ 8,239,161  
           

Assets Held for Sale

        Assets held for sale consists of property related to closed facilities that are currently being marketed for disposal. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying value or estimated fair value less costs to sell. At December 31, 2010, land of $27,000 and two buildings, net of accumulated depreciation, of $405,000 are classified as held for sale and shown in Other Assets on the balance sheet.

Finite Life Intangible Assets

        Finite life intangible assets are primarily related to acquired customer base and bond issuance costs and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Finite life intangible assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 
  December 31, 2010  
 
  Remaining
Lives
(Years)
  Gross
Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
Amount
  Net Book
Value
Amount
 

Bond Issue Costs

    11   $ 79,373   $ 23,814   $ 55,559  

Customer Base

    2     676,557     529,966     146,591  

Other intangibles

    0     28,560     28,560      
                     

Totals

        $ 784,490   $ 582,340   $ 202,150  
                     

 

 
  December 31, 2009  
 
  Remaining
Lives
(Years)
  Gross
Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
Amount
  Net Book
Value
Amount
 

Bond Issue Costs

    12   $ 79,373   $ 18,522   $ 60,851  

Customer Base

    3     676,557     394,655     281,902  

Other intangibles

    1     28,560     27,764     796  
                     

Totals

        $ 784,490   $ 440,941   $ 343,549  
                     

24


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1  NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        Amortization expense related to these assets was as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2010

  $ 141,399  

Year ended December 31, 2009

    150,121  

        Estimated future annual amortization expense related to these assets for the years ending December 31, is as follows:

2011

  $ 141,000  

2012

    17,000  

2013

    5,000  

2014

    5,000  

2015

    5,000  

Thereafter

    29,000  
       

  $ 202,000  
       

Impairment Analysis

        We evaluate property and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives for impairment and for propriety of the related amortization periods, to determine whether adjustments to these amounts or useful lives are required based on current events and circumstances. The evaluation is based on our projection of the undiscounted future operating cash flows of the underlying assets. To the extent such projections indicate that future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying amounts of related assets, a charge might be required to reduce the carrying amount to the asset's estimated fair value. In 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $56,000 on a building held for sale. In connection with the 2009 restructuring plan, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $502,000 on certain property and equipment that will no longer be used in operations (see Note 11).

Preferred Stock

        Preferred stock issued is non-cumulative and nonconvertible. The holders of the preferred stock are entitled to a non-cumulative dividend of 12% when and as declared. In liquidation, holders of preferred stock have preference to the extent of $1.00 per share plus dividends accrued but unpaid. No preferred stock dividends were declared or paid during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue upon shipment of manufactured products to customers, when title has passed, all contractual obligations have been satisfied and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We also provide engineering services separate from the manufacture of a product. Revenue for engineering services, which are short term in nature, is recognized upon completion of the engineering process, providing standalone fair value to our customers. In addition, we have another separate source of revenue that comes from short-term repair services, which are recognized upon completion of the repairs, and the repaired products are shipped back to the customer. Shipping and handling costs charged to our customers are included in net sales, while the corresponding shipping expenses are included in cost of goods sold.

Product Warranties

        We provide limited warranty for the replacement or repair of defective product at no cost to our customers within a specified time period after the sale. We make no other guarantees or warranties, expressed or implied, of any nature whatsoever as to the goods including, without limitation, warranties to merchantability, fit for a particular purpose or non-infringement of patent or the like unless agreed upon in writing. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under our limited warranty and reserve based on actual historical warranty claims coupled with an analysis of unfulfilled claims at the balance sheet date. Our warranty claims costs are not material given the nature of our products and services which normally result in repair and return in the same accounting period.

Advertising

        Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred. The total amount charged to expense was $167,000 and $136,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

25


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1  NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Income Taxes

        We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized annually for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The carrying amounts of all financial instruments approximate their fair values. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the line of credit approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to us for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities, the carrying value of our long-term debt approximates its fair value.

        Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

        The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into one of three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used in valuing the asset or liability.

        Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

        Level 1:    Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

        Level 2:    Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

        Level 3:    Unobservable inputs reflecting management's own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

        Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities being measured and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. We endeavor to use the best available information in measuring fair value. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As of December 31, 2010, our only asset or liability accounted for at fair value is our interest rate swap which is included in Other Long-Term Liabilities. We have determined that the fair value of the swap, based on LIBOR and swap rates, falls within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Stock-Based Compensation

        We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense was $32,000 ($.01 per diluted common share) for 2010 and $128,000 ($.05 per diluted common share) for 2009. See Note 8 for additional information.

Derivative Financial Instruments

        On June 28, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to effectively convert our industrial revenue bond debt from a variable rate to a fixed rate. The change in market value of an interest rate swap is recognized in the statements of operations by a charge or credit to interest expense. Further information related to our interest rate swap is disclosed in Note 4.

26


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

        Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, no outstanding options were included in the computation of per-share amounts as the effect of all stock-based awards were antidilutive.

Supplemental Cash Flow and Noncash Investing Information

        We received income tax refunds, net of $2,027,951 and $519,397 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We paid interest expense of $450,180 and $548,733 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        We had noncash transfers of certain property and equipment with a value of $201,000 and $231,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively from Property and Equipment to Other Assets due to their classification as held for sale.

Enterprise-Wide Disclosures

        Our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 represent a single reportable segment referred to as Contract Manufacturing within the Electronic Manufacturing Services industry. We strategically direct production between our various manufacturing facilities based on a number of considerations to best meet our customers' requirements. We share resources for sales, marketing, information services, cash and risk management, banking, credit and collections, human resources, payroll, internal control, audit, taxes, SEC reporting and corporate accounting. Consolidated financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in assessing performance and allocating resources. Export sales represent approximately 6% and 4% of consolidated sales for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Net sales by our major EMS industry markets for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 
  Year Ended
December 31
 
(in thousands)
  2010   2009  

Aerospace and Defense

  $ 16,152   $ 26,515  

Medical

    29,329     17,493  

Industrial

    54,339     35,932  
           

Total Net Sales

  $ 99,820   $ 79,940  
           

        Noncurrent assets, excluding deferred tax assets, by country are as follows:

 
  United States   Mexico   Total  

2010

                   
 

Net property and equipment

  $ 6,965,816   $ 191,727   $ 7,157,543  
 

Other assets

    708,659     7,726     716,385  

2009

                   
 

Net property and equipment

  $ 8,038,406   $ 200,755   $ 8,239,161  
 

Other assets

    649,341     7,726     657,067  

Foreign Currency Translation

        During the fourth quarter of 2010, we reevaluated the reporting currency and determined that the functional currency for our operations in Mexico is the U.S. Dollar. As a result, the Company is no longer recording translation adjustments related to assets and liabilities or income and expense items that are transacted in the local currency as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in shareholders' equity. Foreign exchange transaction gains and losses attributable to exchange rate movements related to transactions made in the local currency and on intercompany receivables and payables not deemed to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded in other income (expense).

27


NOTE 2 MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

        Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. With regard to cash, we maintain our excess cash balances in checking accounts at one high-credit quality financial institution. These accounts may at times exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in any of the short-term investment instruments we have used for excess cash balances. We do not require collateral on our receivables.

        Two divisions of General Electric, Co. (G.E.) accounted for 10% or more of our net sales during the past two years. G.E.'s Medical Division accounted for 19% and 13% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. G.E.'s Transportation Division accounted for 8% and 12% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Together, G.E.'s Medical and Transportation Divisions accounted for 27% and 25% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Accounts receivable from G.E.'s Medical and Transportation Divisions at December 31, 2010 and 2009 represented 14% and 16% of total accounts receivable, respectively.

NOTE 3 ACCRUED HEALTH AND DENTAL CLAIMS

        In 2009 and through September 2010, we were self-insured for our employee health and dental plans. In September 2010, we entered into a co-employment agreement with Administaff Services, who now provides premium based health and dental plans to our employees. At December 31, 2010 we have an accrual of $35,000 for estimated unpaid health and dental claims related to the run-out of our self-insured plans. Estimated unpaid claims for incurred health and dental services at December 31, 2009 were $310,000.

NOTE 4 FINANCING AGREEMENTS

        On May 27, 2010 we entered into a third amended and restated credit and security agreement with Wells Fargo Bank which provides a $12 million line of credit through May 31, 2013 and a real estate note maturing on May 31, 2012. On January 6, 2011, we entered into the first amendment to this agreement which provides a $13.5 million line of credit through May 31, 2013, a new $475,000 equipment term loan tied to equipment purchased in the recent acquisition announced January 3, 2011 and a new term loan of up to $1.0 million for capital expenditures to be made in 2011. Under the new agreement, both the line of credit and real estate term note are subject to variations in the LIBOR rate. Our line of credit bears interest at three-month LIBOR + 4.00% (4.30% at December 31, 2010). The weighted-average interest rate on our line of credit was 4.63% for the year ended December 31, 2010. We had borrowings of $5,615,121 and $5,490,607 outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        The line of credit and other installment debt with WFB contain certain covenants which, among other things, require us to adhere to regular reporting requirements, abide by annual shareholder dividend limitations, maintain certain financial performance, and limit the amount of annual capital expenditures.

        The availability under the line is subject to borrowing base requirements, and advances are at the discretion of the lender. At December 31, 2010, we have net unused availability under our line of credit of approximately $5.2 million. Under the terms of our new agreement, our unused availability increased to $6.5 million on January 6, 2011. The line is secured by substantially all of our assets.

28


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 4 FINANCING AGREEMENTS (Continued)

        A summary of long-term debt balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

Description
  2010   2009  

Term notes payable—Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., one note bears interest at three month LIBOR + 4.50% (approx. 4.8%) and three month LIBOR + 5.00% (approx 5.375%) at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Two notes bear interest at 4.95%, combined monthly principal payments of approximately $31,000 plus interest, maturities range from June 2011 to May 2012; secured by substantially all assets

  $ 1,848,078   $ 3,736,184  

Industrial revenue bond payable to the City of Blue Earth, Minnesota which bears interest at 4.07% and has a maturity date of June 1, 2021, with principal of $125,000 payable on June 1, 2011 and $80,000 payable annually on June 1 thereafter

   
725,000
   
850,000
 
           
 

Total long-term debt

   
2,573,078
   
4,586,184
 
   

Current maturities of long-term debt

    (841,760 )   (1,013,920 )
           
 

Long-term debt—net of current maturities

  $ 1,731,318   $ 3,572,264  
           

        Future maturity requirements for long-term debt are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,
  Amount  

2011

  $ 841,760  

2012

    1,211,318  

2013

    80,000  

2014

    80,000  

2015

    80,000  

Future

    280,000  
       

  $ 2,573,078  
       

        On June 28, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $1,440,000 to effectively convert our industrial revenue bond debt from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 4.07% for five years, maturing on June 28, 2011. The amortized notional amount outstanding at December 31, 2010 was approximately $873,000. We do not use this interest rate swap for speculative purposes. The fair value of the swap of $18,140 and $45,912 was recorded in Other Long-Term Liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in the fair value of ($27,772) and ($18,893) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively have been recorded as a component of interest expense.

NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES

        The income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following:

 
  2010   2009  

Current taxes—Federal

  $ 128,000   $ (2,500,000 )

Current taxes—State

    (41,000 )   (73,000 )

Current taxes—Foreign

    19,000     10,000  

Deferred taxes—Federal

    253,000     324,000  

Deferred taxes—State

    16,000     (148,000 )
           
 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  $ 375,000   $ (2,387,000 )
           

29


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The statutory rate reconciliation for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

 
  2010   2009  

Statutory federal tax provision (benefit)

  $ 298,000   $ (2,115,000 )

State income taxes (benefit)

    34,000     (147,000 )

Effect of foreign operations

    (5,000 )    

Income tax credits

    (95,000 )   (109,000 )

NOL carryback true up

    106,000      

Other, including benefit of income taxed at lower rates

    37,000     (16,000 )
           
 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  $ 375,000   $ (2,387,000 )
           

        Income (loss) from operations before income taxes was derived from the following sources:

 
  2010   2009  

Domestic

  $ 820,000   $ (6,251,000 )

Foreign

    62,000     29,000  
           
 

Total

  $ 882,000   $ (6,222,000 )
           

        Deferred tax assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2010 and 2009, consist of the following:

 
  2010   2009  

Allowance for uncollectable accounts

  $ 31,000   $ 50,000  

Inventories reserve

    383,000     400,000  

Accrued vacation

    308,000     262,000  

Health insurance reserve

    13,000     113,000  

Non-compete amortization

    397,000     400,000  

Stock-based compensation

    59,000     47,000  

Other

    425,000     607,000  
           
 

Deferred tax assets

    1,616,000     1,879,000  
           

Prepaid expenses

    (211,000 )   (188,000 )

Property and equipment

    (592,000 )   (590,000 )
           
 

Deferred tax liabilities

    (803,000 )   (778,000 )
           
 

Net deferred tax assets

  $ 813,000   $ 1,101,000  
           

Net current deferred tax assets

  $ 594,000   $ 753,000  

Net non-current deferred tax assets

    219,000     348,000  
           
 

Net deferred tax assets

  $ 813,000   $ 1,101,000  
           

        We have determined that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized, principally through anticipated taxable income in future tax years. As a result, we have determined that establishing a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets is not necessary.

30


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 5  INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The tax effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in our consolidated financial statements, only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The following table sets forth changes in our total gross unrecognized tax benefit liabilities, excluding accrued interest, for the year ended December 31, 2010:

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  $ 115,000  

Tax positions related to current year:

       
 

Additions

    27,000  
 

Reductions

    (28,000 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 114,000  
       

        The $114,000 of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010 includes amounts which, if ultimately recognized, will reduce our annual effective tax rate.

        Our policy is to accrue interest related to potential underpayment of income taxes within the provision for income taxes. The liability for accrued interest as of December 31, 2010 was not significant. Interest is computed on the difference between our uncertain tax benefit positions and the amount deducted or expected to be deducted in our tax returns.

        Due to statute expiration, an approximate $35,000 decrease could occur with respect to our reserve in the next twelve months. This reserve, including associated interest, relates to federal research tax credits and section 199 deductions.

        We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply.

        With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2007. We are currently under audit by the IRS related primarily to the 2009 NOL carry back claim. We are not aware of any significant items as a result of the IRS audit that should either be incorporated into the FIN 48 analysis or tax projections for the year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE 6 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

        Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes income or losses resulting from foreign currency translations. The details of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

 
  Year Ended
December 31
2010
  Year Ended
December 31
2009
 

Net income (loss), as reported

  $ 506,766   $ (3,835,041 )

Other comprehensive income

    10,973     15,689  
           

Comprehensive income (loss)

  $ 517,739   $ (3,819,352 )
           

NOTE 7 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN

        We have a 401(k) profit sharing plan (the "Plan") for our employees. The Plan is a defined contribution plan covering all of our employees except for employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement and non-resident aliens earning non-U.S. source income. Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after completing three months of service and attaining the age of 18. Employees are allowed to contribute up to 60% of

31


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 7  401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)


their wages to the Plan. Historically we have matched 25% of the employees' contribution up to 6% of covered compensation. We suspended this benefit from the second quarter of 2009 thru June 2010. We made contributions of approximately $79,000 and $84,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

NOTE 8 INCENTIVE PLANS

Employee Profit Sharing

        During 1993, we adopted an employee profit sharing plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to provide a bonus for increased output, improved quality and productivity and reduced costs. We have authorized 50,000 common shares to be available under this Plan. In accordance with the terms of the Plan, employees could acquire newly issued shares of common stock for 90% of the current market value. During 2009, 37 common shares were issued in connection with this plan and zero were issued in 2010. Through December 31, 2010, 22,118 common shares had been issued under this Plan.

Stock Options

        In 1992, we approved the adoption of a fixed stock based compensation plan. In February 2003, we reached the maximum options allowed to be granted under that plan.

        During 2003, our shareholders approved the adoption of the Nortech Systems Incorporated 2003 Stock Option Plan (the "2003 Plan"). On May 3, 2005, the shareholders approved the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan") and eliminated the remaining 172,500 option shares available for grant under the 2003 Plan effective February 23, 2005. The total number of shares of common stock that may be granted under the 2005 Plan is 200,000, of which 23,750 remain available for grant at December 31, 2010. The 2005 Plan provides that option shares granted come from our authorized but unissued common stock. The price of the option shares granted under the plan will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. Options are generally exercisable after one or more years and expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant.

        During 2007, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the FOCUS Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan"). The purpose of the 2007 Plan was to provide incentives to our employees to increase our return on sales "ROS" performance measurement. The FOCUS plan is unique from the preceding Plans in that vesting of options is conditional upon our achievement of established performance measurements as follows:

    If we achieve 1.95% ROS for any of the three years ending 2007, 2008, or 2009, one-third of the options will vest.

    If we achieve 3% ROS for either of the two calendar years 2008 or 2009, an additional one-third of the options will vest.

    If we achieve 4% ROS for the calendar year 2009, the remaining one-third of the options will vest.

        As these performance measures were not met, no options granted through December 31, 2010 from the 2007 Plan will ever vest.

        We estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in the consolidated statement of operations over the requisite service periods. Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, share-based compensation expense will be reduced to account for estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise the estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

        We used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of option-based awards. Our determination of fair value of option-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables as noted in the following table. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, risk-free interest rate, and the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury

32


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 8  INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)


instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of our stock options. The expected volatility and holding period are based on our historical experience. For all grants, the amount of compensation expense recognized has been adjusted for an estimated forfeiture rate, which is based on historical data. The variables used for the grants for the year ended December 31, 2009 are below. There were no grants during the year ended December 31, 2010.

 
  2009

Expected volatility

  49.0%

Expected dividends

  None

Expected term (in years)

  7

Risk-free rate

  2.6 - 2.7%

Stock Options with Time-Based Vesting

        Total compensation expense related to stock options with time-based vesting for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $31,728 and $128,047, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 there was approximately $27,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested option awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 0.85 years.

Stock Options with Performance-Based Vesting

        As mentioned previously, the vesting of options granted under the 2007 Plan was conditional upon the Company meeting established performance measurements. At December 31, 2009, the performance measures were not met and the measurement period expired. Therefore, no options granted to date from the 2007 Plan will ever vest, although the options will remain outstanding until the earlier of the option expiration date or the termination of the employee. No compensation expense has been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and no expense is expected to be recorded in the future related to these option grants.

        A summary of option activity under all plans as of December 31, 2010, and changes during the year then ended is presented below.

 
  Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding—January 1, 2010

    736,750   $ 7.20              

Granted

                     

Exercised

    (4,000 )   3.13              

Forfeited

    (69,600 )   6.21              
                         

Outstanding—December 31, 2010

    663,150   $ 7.32     5.54   $ 4,627  
                       

Exercisable on December 31, 2010

    303,250   $ 7.30     4.31   $  
                       

        The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2009 was $1.92. There were no grants during the year ended December 31, 2010. The weighted-average fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $3.69 and $3.70, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2010 was $20. There were no options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009. Cash received from option exercise under all share-based payment arrangements for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $12,500. We recognize the tax benefit from the exercise of options in the statement of cash flows as a cash inflow from financing activities.

33


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 8 INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)

Equity Appreciation Rights Plan

        In November 2010, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Nortech Systems Incorporated Equity Appreciation Rights Plan (the "2010 Plan"). The total number of Equity Appreciation Right Units (Units) the Plan can issue shall not exceed an aggregate of 750,000 Units, of which 100,000 Units were issued during the year. The 2010 Plan provides that Units issued shall fully vest three years from the grant date unless terminated earlier. Units give the holder a right to receive a cash payment equal to the appreciation in book value per share of common stock from the base date, as defined, to the redemption date. Unit redemption payments under this plan shall be paid in cash within 90 days after we determine the book value of the Units as of the calendar year immediately preceding the redemption date. The Units issued during the year ended December 31, 2010 have a book value per Unit of $6.84 and have a weighted average life remaining of two years at December 31, 2010. Total compensation expense related to these Units based on the estimated appreciation over their remaining term for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $5,096.

NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

        We have various operating leases for production and office equipment, office space, and buildings under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring on various dates through 2017.

        In connection with the restructuring activities during 2009, the Garner, Iowa facility was sub-leased through the remaining term of the lease which expires on June 30, 2011. At December 31, 2010 future minimum lease payments, net of sublease income, was $0.

        Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to approximately $914,000 and $875,000 respectively.

        Approximate future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable leases are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,
  Amount  

2011

  $ 303,000  

2012

    461,000  

2013

    461,000  

2014

    458,000  

2015

    398,000  

Thereafter

    328,000  
       

Total

  $ 2,409,000  
       

Litigation

        We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

Executive Life Insurance Plan

        During 2002, we set up an Executive Bonus Life Insurance Plan (the "Plan") for our key employees ("participants"). Pursuant to the Plan, we will pay a bonus to officer participants of 15% and a bonus to all other participants of 10% of the participants' base annual salary, as well as an additional bonus to cover federal and state taxes incurred by the participants. The participants are required to purchase life insurance and retain ownership of the life insurance policy once it is purchased. The Plan provides a five-year graded vesting schedule in which the participants vest at a rate of 20% each year. Should a participant terminate employment prior to the fifth year of vesting, that participant may be required to reimburse us for any unvested amounts, under certain circumstances. Expenses under the Plan were $338,000 and $44,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Due to the economic downturn and cost reduction efforts this benefit was reduced in 2009 and reinstated in its entirety in 2010.

34


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 9  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Change of Control Agreements

        During 2002, we entered into Change of Control Agreements (the "Agreement(s)") with certain key executives ("the Executive(s)"). The Agreements provide an inducement for each Executive to remain as an employee in the event of any proposed or anticipated change of control in the organization, including facilitating an orderly transition, and to provide economic security for the Executive after a change in control has occurred.

        In the event of an involuntarily termination, each Executive would receive their base salary, annual bonus at time of termination, and continued participation in health, disability and life insurance plans for a period of three years for officers and two years for all other participants. Participants would also receive professional outplacement services up to $10,000, if applicable. Each Agreement remains in full force until the Executive terminates employment or we terminate the employment of the Executive.

NOTE 10 NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

        The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the diluted net income per common share computations.

 
  2010   2009  

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

             

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 506,766   $ (3,835,041 )
           

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    2,742,389     2,738,982  

Stock options

         
           

Weighted average common shares for diluted net income (loss) per common share

    2,742,389     2,738,982  
           

Diluted net income (loss) per common share*

  $ 0.18   $ (1.40 )
           

        For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the effect of all stock options is antidilutive either due to net loss incurred in 2009 or because to include them would be antidilutive in 2010. Therefore, no outstanding options were included in the computation of per-share amounts.

NOTE 11 RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

        To better align our cost structure with changes in customer demand, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. This restructuring resulted in the closing of our Garner, Iowa facility at the end of August 2009 with production moving to Merrifield, Minnesota and closing our Fairmont Aerospace assembly production facilities and moving these activities to Blue Earth, Minnesota. One building in Fairmont was sold and another was held for sale at December 31, 2009 and was reclassified to Other Assets on the balance sheet. As a result of these moves, we recognized approximately $968,000 of restructuring and impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2009, in Income (Loss) from Operations.

        The restructuring and impairment costs included $502,000 of non-cash property and equipment charges and $466,000 in cash charges related to employee benefits, contract termination costs, and other expenses incurred to relocate production. The property and equipment impairment charges were for certain assets identified that are no longer being used in our operations as a result of the restructuring.

        In 2010, we abandoned a second building in Fairmont and recognized an impairment charge of $56,000 based on a real estate appraisal completed. At December 31, 2010 the two remaining buildings are classified as held for sale and included in Other Assets on the balance sheet.

NOTE 12 BUSINESS ACQUISITION

        On May 4, 2010, we acquired all of the intellectual property and assets, excluding cash and receivables, of Trivirix Corporation, Milaca, MN for cash of $403,000. The fair value of assets acquired included $303,000 in inventory and $100,000 in property and equipment. This operation specializes in design, manufacturing and post-production services of complex electronic and electromechanical medical devices for diagnostic,

35


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 12  BUSINESS ACQUISITION (Continued)


analytical and other life-science applications. This acquisition expands our capabilities and expertise serving medical electronics manufacturers. The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination and results of operations for Milaca since the date of acquisition are included in the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 13 SUBSEQUENT EVENT (UNAUDITED)

        On November 15, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Winland Electronics, Inc. (Winland) to acquire substantially all of Winland's EMS assets and assume certain liabilities relating to their EMS operations located in Mankato, MN. The purchase was completed on January 1, 2011. Winland is a designer and manufacturer of custom electronic control products and systems. This purchase will provide needed manufacturing capacity, particularly for supporting medical and industrial customers with printed circuit board assemblies and higher-level builds.

        We paid $1,042,389 in cash at closing and will make deferred payments of $250,000 on each July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2011. We also agreed to purchase a minimum of $2,200,000 of inventory as consumed over the next 24 months.

        In connection with the acquisition, Nortech also entered into an agreement to manufacture certain products related to the production of Winland's remaining proprietary monitoring devices business unit and Nortech also agreed to a six year agreement to lease office and manufacturing space at 1950 Excel Drive, Mankato, Minnesota, 56001, and sublease 1,000 square feet back to Winland for one year.

        The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values at the time of the acquisition:

Accounts receivable

  $ 1,914,723  

Property, plant and equipment

    2,451,000  

Accounts payable assumed

    (1,772,334 )

Lease payoff

    (259,385 )
       
 

Net assets acquired

  $ 2,334,004  
       

Cash Paid at Closing

   
1,042,389
 

Due to Winland

    500,000  
       
 

Purchase price

    1,542,389  

Bargain purchase gain

    791,615  
       
 

Net assets acquired

  $ 2,334,004  
       

        We will recognize a $791,615 bargain purchase gain related to the excess fair value over the purchase price for the assets acquired.

        The Mankato operations results are not included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition was after December 31, 2010; however the table below reflects our unaudited pro forma combined results of operations as if the acquisition had taken place as of January 1, 2010:

 
  Pro Forma
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 

Net Sales

  $ 114,473,000  

Net Loss

  $ (291,000 )
       

Basic Loss per Common Share

  $ (0.11 )
       

        Combined results for the two companies for the year ended December 31, 2010 were adjusted for the following in order to create the unaudited proforma results in the table above:

    Additional rent expense of approximately $178,000 for the lease of the facility from Winland,

    Additional depreciation expense of approximately $158,000 resulting from the adjustment of property and equipment to their fair values,

36


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 13  SUBSEQUENT EVENT (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

    Elimination of inventory obsolescence charges of approximately $297,000 as we did not acquire Winland's inventory as part of the acquisition,

    Tax benefit of approximately $489,000 using an effective tax rate of 38 percent,

    The impact of these adjustments on outstanding shares of 2,742,389 was to decrease proforma loss per share by $0.29.

        The pro forma unaudited results do not purport to be indicative of the results which would have been obtained had the acquisition been completed as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. In addition they do not include any benefits that may result from the acquisition due to synergies that may be derived from the elimination of any duplicative costs.

37


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplementary Information

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary

        Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated March 11, 2011, (included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary, listed in Item 15(a) of this Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility of Nortech Systems Incorporated and Subsidiary's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits of the consolidated financial statements.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 11, 2011

38


Table of Contents


NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

SCHEDULE II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

Classification
  Balance at
Beginning
of Year
  Additions Charged
to Costs
and Expenses
  Deductions   Balance at
End of
Year
 

Year Ended December 31, 2010:

                         
 

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

  $ 138,000   $ 58,000   $ (110,000 ) $ 86,000  
 

Inventory Reserves

    1,095,000     1,243,000     (1,296,000 )   1,042,000  
 

Self-insurance Accrual

    310,000     3,110,000     (3,385,000 )   35,000  

Year Ended December 31, 2009:

                         
 

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

  $ 492,000   $ 226,000   $ (580,000 ) $ 138,000  
 

Inventory Reserves

    1,340,000     966,000     (1,211,000 )   1,095,000  
 

Self-insurance Accrual

    446,000     4,663,000     (4,799,000 )   310,000  

39


Table of Contents

ITEM 9.        CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

        None.

ITEM 9A.        CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        (a)    Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.    In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company's management evaluated, with the participation of the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the date of such evaluation in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        (b)    Changes in internal control.    There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the effectiveness of our internal control processes over the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

        All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

        We have assessed the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

        This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B.        OTHER INFORMATION

        None.

40


Table of Contents


PART III

ITEM 10.        DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

        Information regarding the directors and executive officers of the Registrant will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statement are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.        EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        Information regarding executive compensation of the Registrant will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statement are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management of the Registrant will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statements are incorporated herein by reference.

        Information regarding executive compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) as of the end of the last fiscal year, on two categories of equity compensation plans (that is, plans that have been approved by security holders and plans that have not been approved by security holders) will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statements are incorporated herein by reference.

        The following table provides information about our equity compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) as of December 31, 2010.

Plan category
  Number of
securities to be
issued upon
the exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the first
column)(2)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    663,150   $ 7.32     167,950  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

    0     0     0  
               

Total

    663,150   $ 7.32     167,950  
               

(1)
Represents common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted under our 1992 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the "1992 Plan"), the 2003 Stock Option Plan (the "2003 Plan"), the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan") and the 2007 FOCUS Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2007 Plan").

(2)
Represents common shares remaining available for issuance under the 2005 and 2007 Plans.

41


Table of Contents

ITEM 13.        CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        The information required by this Item will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statements are incorporated herin by reference.

ITEM 14.        PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

        The information required by this Item will be included in the Registrant's 2010 proxy statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2010, the end of our fiscal year, and said portions of the proxy statement are incorporated herin by reference.


PART IV

ITEM 15.        EXHIBITS, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES

(a)1.

      Consolidated Financial Statements—Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes are included in Part II, Item 8, and are identified in the Index on Page 23.  

(a)2.

     

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule—The following financial statement schedule and the Auditors' report thereon is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 
 
   
   
  Page  

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplementary Information

    38  

 

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended December 31,2010 and 2009:

       

 

    Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

    39  

        All other schedules are omitted because the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(a)3.   The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:

  10.7   First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

 

10.8

 

Winland Asset Purchase Agreement

 

23.1

 

Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP.

 

31.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

32.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

42


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    NORTECH SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ RICHARD G. WASIELEWSKI

Richard G. Wasielewski
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ MICHAEL J. DEGEN

Michael J. Degen
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated have signed this report.

March 11, 2011   /s/ MICHAEL J. DEGEN

Michael J. Degen
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ MYRON KUNIN

Myron Kunin
Chairman and Director

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ RICHARD W. PERKINS

Richard W. Perkins,
Director

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ C. TRENT RILEY

C. Trent Riley,
Director

March 11, 2011

 

/s/ KEN LARSON

Ken Larson,
Director

43


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

DESCRIPTIONS OF EXHIBITS

10.7   First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

10.8

 

Winland Asset Purchase Agreement

23.1

 

Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

31.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

44