Attached files

file filename
8-K - FORM 8-K - WESTAR ENERGY INC /KSd8k.htm
1
UBS Electric Power Conference
March
2
&
3,
2011
Dallas, TX
UBS Utilities Conference
Exhibit 99.1


2
Forward Looking Disclosures
Forward-looking
statements:
Certain
matters
discussed
in
this
presentation
are
“forward-
looking
statements.”
The
Private
Securities
Litigation
Reform
Act
of
1995
has
established
that
these
statements
qualify
for
safe
harbors
from
liability.
Forward-looking
statements
may
include
words
like
“believe,”
“anticipate,”
“target,”
“expect,”
“pro
forma,”
“estimate,”
“intend,”
“guidance”
or
words
of
similar
meaning.
Forward-looking
statements
describe
future
plans,
objectives,
expectations
or
goals.
Although
Westar
Energy
believes
that
its
expectations
are
based
on
reasonable
assumptions,
all
forward-looking
statements
involve
risk
and
uncertainty.
The
factors
that
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
materially
from
these
forward-looking
statements
include
those
discussed
herein
as
well
as
(1)
those
discussed
in
the
company’s
Annual
Report
on
Form
10-K
for
the
year
ended
Dec.
31,
2010
(a)
under
the
heading,
“Forward-Looking
Statements,”
(b)
in
ITEM
1.
Business,
(c)
in
ITEM
1A.
Risk
Factors,
(d)
in
ITEM
7.
Management’s
Discussion
and
Analysis
of
Financial
Condition
and
Results
of
Operations,
and
(e)
in
ITEM
8.
Financial
Statements
and
Supplementary
Data:
Notes
13
and
15;
and
(2)
other
factors
discussed
in
the
company’s
filings
with
the
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission.
Any
forward-looking
statement
speaks
only
as
of
the
date
such
statement
was
made,
and
the
company
does
not
undertake
any
obligation
to
update
any
forward-looking
statement
to
reflect
events
or
circumstances after the date on which such statement was made.
UBS Utilities Conference


3
Recent Events
Reported strong 2010 results well above last year
Issued 2011 earnings guidance of $1.65 to $1.80
Dividend
increased
for
7
th
consecutive
year
Updated 3-year capital expenditures
Added $270 million revolving credit facility
Outlined active 2011 regulatory agenda
UBS Utilities Conference


4
EPS from continuing operations of $1.81 vs. $1.28 last year
Retail MWh sales increased 6%
Above plan
Warmer than normal weather
Signs of economic recovery
Industrials up 6%
Implemented all planned price adjustments (annualized amts):
Abbreviated rate case -
$17 million
Transmission adjustments -
$16 million
Environmental adjustment -
$14 million
Energy efficiency adjustment -
$6 million
No COLI proceeds in 2010
2010 Results Well Above 2009
UBS Utilities Conference


5
2011 Earnings Guidance of $1.65 to $1.80
Expect price adjustments via tracking adjustments
Weather
adjusted
retail
sales
grow
1%
O&M increase
1%
SG&A flat to decrease
1%
Depreciation increases
$15 million
AFUDC equity decreases
$2 million
COLI proceeds of $0.10 per share
Interest charges increases
$5 million
Effective tax rate of 29% -
31%
Funding 2011 construction program
Issue 12.7 million shares priced under forward sale agreements
Borrowing from revolving credit facilities and/or issuance of debt
UBS Utilities Conference


6
$0.92
$1.00
$1.08
$1.16
$1.20
$1.24
$1.28
$0.75
$0.85
$0.95
$1.05
$1.15
$1.25
$1.35
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Dividend
Quarterly dividend increased 3% effective April 1
Long-standing dividend payout target of 60%-75% of earnings
2011 guidance implies payout at upper end of range
Indicated
annual rate
UBS Utilities Conference


7
Capital Expenditure Forecast 2011 -
2013
Actual
Forecast
Forecast
Forecast
Forecast
2010
2011
2012
2013
2011 - 2013
Method of Cost Recovery
Generation  replacements and other
83.4
$      
130.4
$   
146.4
$   
150.6
$   
427.4
$   
General Rate Case (GRC)
Westar environmental
107.7
      
181.1
      
200.1
      
154.3
      
535.5
     
ECRR
La Cygne environmental
3.9
          
63.0
        
171.0
      
195.1
      
429.1
     
ECRR
Nuclear Fuel
35.3
        
25.1
        
30.1
        
41.7
        
96.9
       
Fuel adjustment clause
Transmission
197.3
      
192.7
      
161.3
      
164.1
      
518.1
     
FERC formula rate/TDC
Distribution
  New customers, replacements & other
78.7
        
95.9
        
102.2
      
106.4
      
304.5
     
GRC
Smart grid (a)
10.3
        
13.6
        
13.6
       
GRC
Other
23.5
        
19.8
        
15.0
        
11.0
        
45.8
       
GRC
Total
540.1
$    
721.6
$   
826.1
$   
823.2
$   
2,370.9
$
(a) net of DOE matching grant
In 2011, 2012 and 2013, Westar plans to incur additional expenditures related to the Prairie Wind Transmission joint venture (not inlcuded in above forecast amounts).
Prairie Wind Transmission joint venture
2.7
$        
22.5
$      
13.8
$      
39.0
$     
UBS Utilities Conference


8
Capital Expenditure Forecast 2011 -
2013
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
2010
2011
2012
2013
$540
$722
$826
$823
Environmental
Other
Transmission
62%
65%
61%
UBS Utilities Conference
57%


9
Four year maturity
2 options to extend term up to 1 year
Accordion option allows for increase up to $400 million
Increased total credit lines to $1 billion
Existing $730 million facility
New $270 million facility
New $270 Million Revolving Credit Facility
UBS Utilities Conference


10
Significant Planned Regulatory Agenda
Seek predetermination for 370MW of renewables
Update TDC tariff
KCC docket reviewing retrofit economics for coal plants
Request siting authority for Prairie Wind Transmission line
Update ECRR tariff
Update energy efficiency rider
Plan to file general rate case late spring or early summer
UBS Utilities Conference


11
2011 Plans
UBS Utilities Conference


12
Statute requires
200 MW additional renewables
Seeking
predetermination
from
KCC
for
370
MW
through
PPAs
Tentative agreements for 2 projects
Post Rock Wind Farm -
201 MW
Ironwood Wind Farm –
168 MW
Expect both projects to be in-service by end 2012
KCC Staff and CURB agree with company’s request
Expect decision in May 2011
Seeking Predetermination for 370 MW of Renewables
UBS Utilities Conference


13
Annualized Rate & Revenue Changes
Actual and Estimated
2010
2011
(Estimated)
2012
(Estimated)
Base rates
$17
million
Feb
(Abbreviated rate case)
TBD
Transmission rates
$16
million
Jan 1
$17
million
Jan 1
$17
million
Jan 1
ECRR
$14
million
June 1
$10
million
June 1
$29
million
June 1
Energy Efficiency
$6 million
November
$11 million
November
$13 million
November
UBS Utilities Conference


14
Major Construction Projects Underway
Environmental
Lawrence Energy Center
Install fabric filters, rebuild scrubbers, precipitator, low NOx
system
Jeffery Energy Center
Install SCR on 1 unit
La Cygne Energy Center
Scrubbers, fabric filters, common chimney, SCR and low NOx system
Transmission
Wichita to Oklahoma 345 kV
Planning and design Prairie Wind line
SmartStar Lawrence
$40 million project reduced by 50% DOE match
Advanced outage management
Automated metering infrastructure
UBS Utilities Conference


15
Projected Rate Base 2010 –
2015 (in billions)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Base
Environmental
Transmission
$6.7
$6.3
$5.9
$5.4
$5.0
$4.5
$3.5
$3.5
$3.5
$3.6
$3.7
$3.8
UBS Utilities Conference


16
Transmission
UBS Utilities Conference


17
Major Transmission Investments Underway
Rose Hill –
Oklahoma
Under  construction
Target completion mid 2012
Investment
$100 million
Prairie Wind Transmission
50/50 JV with ETA
Siting request Feb 2011
Begin construction mid 2012
Estimated completion 2014
Project cost
$225 million
UBS Utilities Conference


18
Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC
Joint venture formed between Westar Energy and Electric Transmission
America
Venture to develop high voltage transmission in Kansas
50% Westar / 50% ETA
ETA is joint venture between AEP Transmission Holding Company and MEHC
America Transco, LLC (wholly-owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Company)
Prairie Wind
Project
UBS Utilities Conference


19
Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC
Received FERC incentives
Abandonment costs
Recovery of pre-commercial development costs
CWIP recovery in rate base
50/50 capital structure
Allowed ROE of 12.8%
KCC
Siting request filed Feb 28, 2011
Southwest Power Pool
Regional cost allocation approved by FERC
“Notice to Construct”
accepted
JV became a member of the SPP
Awaiting SPP adoption of formula rate
UBS Utilities Conference


20
Next Steps and Tentative Schedule for Prairie Wind JV
Obtain siting authority from KCC
Engineer and design
Acquire rights-of-way
Construction
Anticipated to start by mid 2012
Target completion late 2014
UBS Utilities Conference


21
Profile
UBS Utilities Conference


22
Strategic Approach
Embrace uncertainty and acknowledge inability to predict the
future
Place a high value on flexibility
Operational
Financial
Regulatory
Leverage actions and strategies around intrinsic advantages
Seek collaborative and constructive approaches to regulation
Value proposition
Protect against downside while growing investor returns
UBS Utilities Conference


23
Pure-play, vertically integrated, rate-regulated
7,000 MW of generation
6,200 miles transmission
687,000 customers
Kansas’
Largest Electric Provider
UBS Utilities Conference


24
Favorable Supply Portfolio
$56.37
$17.45
$6.50
Uranium
Coal
Gas
Ave. Fuel Cost
$18.37/MWh
Fuel Mix
Coal
49%
Gas
39%
Wind
4%
Uranium
8%
MW Capacity
5.0¢
6.0¢
7.0¢
8.0¢
9.0¢
10.0¢
Westar Energy
Kansas City Power
and Light (KS)
Empire District
Electric (KS)
National
Average
7.6¢
8.4¢
8.4¢
Low Rates
Source: Edison Electric Institute 07/01/2010
Coal
74%
Gas
7%
Wind
3%
Uranium
16%
Cost of Fuel
UBS Utilities Conference


25
Diverse Energy Sales (MWh)
Chemical & oil
Food
processing
Aerospace
Consumer
manufacturing
Other
Commercial
38%
Residential
35%
Industrial
27%
39%
17%
16%
16%
12%
12%
18%
8%
7%
3%
4%
48%
Other
General
merchandise
Grocery/
Convenience
Real estate
Health care
Government
Education
UBS Utilities Conference


26
Strong Service Territory
Overall economic conditions
significantly better than nation
No real estate crash
State unemployment remains
2+ pts favorable to nation
Industrial sales showing signs
of recovery
’10 up 6% over ‘09 levels
Pentagon awards refueling
tanker contract to Boeing
Benefits Wichita and Kansas
economy
UBS Utilities Conference


27
Capitalization and Liquidity
Target
50/50 capital structure
Solid investment grade credit
Total credit facility capacity $1 billion
No bonds mature before 2014
December 31, 2010
(a)
(millions)
Long-term, net
$2,491
Preferred
21
Common
2,383
Total Capitalization
$4,895
Debt
51%
Equity
49%
Preferred
<1%
(a) Capitalization excludes short-term debt and
adjustments for VIEs
UBS Utilities Conference


28
Potential for High Voltage Transmission Growth
A.
JEC to Iatan
Energy Center
B.
JEC to Concordia
C.
Concordia to
Salina
D.
Salina to Hays
E.
JEC to Swissvale
F.
Hutchinson to
Spearville
G.
Wichita to Rose
Hill
H.
Wolf Creek to
Emporia
F
G
A
B
C
E
D
H
UBS Utilities Conference


29
Westar’s Value Proposition
Solid, transparent business strategy
Strong, experienced utility management team
Thoughtful, disciplined approach to operations, capital planning
and financing
Constructive regulatory and policy environment
Results in lower prices for customers
Provides investors clarity
Focus on containing risks and maintaining returns
Diverse customer base and stable service territory
UBS Utilities Conference


30
Rates and Regulation
UBS Utilities Conference


31
Regulatory Approach
A sound regulatory and energy policy platform
KCC and FERC
Ultimately results in lower rates for customers
Time
Traditional GRC
Riders coupled with GRC
Ultimately,
lower rates
UBS Utilities Conference


32
Methods of Cost Recovery
Revenue Requirement
Method of Recovery
Comment
1.
Fuel, purchased power and
environmental consumables
Quarterly adjustment based on
forecasted cost, with annual true-up
Adjusts prices for actual costs,
protecting both customers and
investors from mispricing
2.
Environmental capital
Environmental Cost Recovery Rider
adjusts annually
Allows annual price adjustment to
reflect capital costs for investments
in emission controls
3.
Transmission rate recovery
FERC formula rate adjusts annually;
companion retail tariff to reflect
current revenue requirement
Timely recovery of transmission
system operating and capital costs
4.
General capital investments
Traditional rate case, but with
predetermination and CWIP
Typical rate case reflects current
level of operating expenses and
most recent plant investment
5.
Property taxes
Annual adjustment to reflect current
property taxes
Allows timely recovery of actual
property tax costs in current rates
6.
Extraordinary storm damages
Traditionally deferred accounting
treatment as rate base
Smoothes period expenses for
extraordinary storm restoration costs
7.
Pension expenses
Deferred as a regulatory asset for
subsequent recovery
Smoothes period expenses in
excess of amount in base rates
8.
Energy efficiency programs
Deferred as a regulatory asset for
subsequent recovery
Smoothes period expenses for
energy efficiency programs
UBS Utilities Conference


33
Retail Energy Cost Adjustment (RECA)
Provides timely price adjustments for fuel and purchased power
costs
Retail rates based on forecast of fuel and purchased power costs
and retail sales
Set quarterly
Difference between forecast and actual is deferred
Quarterly approach produces more stable prices
Annual settlement of deferred balance
RECA also used to rebate wholesale margins as a credit to retail
cost of service
Energy Marketing (i.e., non-asset) margins continue to be excluded
from rate setting
UBS Utilities Conference


34
Environmental Cost Recovery Rider Mechanics
ECRR adjusts retail rates annually to reflect capital investments in 
emission controls
Investments as of December 31 recovered in rates subsequent June
Eliminates need to file a rate case to capture rate base additions
Return of
and on
capital that is in service December 31
Return on
capital not yet placed in service December 31 (i.e., CWIP)
ECRR reduces regulatory lag
Regulatory lag limited to months, rather than longer lag typically
associated with traditional rate case filings
UBS Utilities Conference


35
Illustrative ECRR Mechanics
(1)
Illustration reflects only the projects publicly announced and assumes one-half of annual investment in service at year end
(2)
Illustration uses
12% pretax return and 4% depreciation recovery
(3)
Annual ECRR Tariff is effective June 1; assume Jan-May at prior year revenue requirement and Jun-Dec at new revenue requirement
Clean Air Investment (1)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Year 1 Investment
238.4
$    
Year 2 Investment
85.2
$     
Year 3 Investment
111.7
$    
Year 4 Investment
244.1
$    
Year 5 Investment
375.1
$    
Year 6 Investment
349.4
$    
Environmental Investment
238.4
$    
323.6
$    
435.3
$    
679.4
$    
1,054.5
1,403.9
Accumulated Depreciation Clean Air Investment
Depreciation on Year 1 Investment
4.8
$       
9.5
$       
9.5
$       
9.5
$       
9.5
$       
9.5
$       
Depreciation on Year 2 Investment
1.7
         
3.4
         
3.4
         
3.4
         
3.4
         
Depreciation on Year 3 Investment
2.2
         
4.5
         
4.5
         
4.5
         
Depreciation on Year 4 Investment
4.9
         
9.8
         
9.8
         
Depreciation on Year 5 Investment
7.5
         
15.0
       
Depreciation on Year 6 Investment
7.0
         
Annual Depreciation
4.8
$       
11.2
$     
15.2
$     
22.3
$     
34.7
$     
49.2
$     
Total Accum Depreciation for Environmental Investment
4.8
$       
16.0
$     
31.2
$     
53.5
$     
88.2
$     
137.3
$    
Environmental Investment, net of Accum. Depreciation
233.6
$    
307.6
$    
404.1
$    
625.9
$    
966.3
$    
1,266.6
Return on
prior YE investment balance (2)
28.0
$     
36.9
$     
48.5
$     
75.1
$     
116.0
$    
Return of
prior YE investments completed
4.8
         
11.2
       
15.2
       
22.3
       
34.7
       
Annual ECRR Revenue Requirement
32.8
$     
48.2
$     
63.7
$     
97.4
$     
150.6
$    
Estimated calendar year revenue recognition (3)
19.1
$     
41.8
$     
57.2
$     
83.3
$     
128.5
$    
Cumulative ECRR revenue recognition
19.1
$     
60.9
$     
118.1
$    
201.4
$    
329.9
$    
UBS Utilities Conference


36
Transmission Cost Recovery
FERC formula transmission rate
Changes in cost of service reflected in annual update of FERC tariff
Update posted each October using projected test year
Capital expenditures
O&M
Tariff based on year-end consolidated capital structure
FERC transmission changes effective January 1
Allowed ROE 11.3%
Annual true-up compares projected revenue requirement to actual, with
difference incorporated into next update
Incentives on recently completed central Kansas line
12.3% ROE
Accelerated book depreciation of 15 vs. 45 years
Transmission Delivery Charge (TDC)
Retail rates adjusted to match changes to FERC tariff
UBS Utilities Conference


37
Transmission Formula Rate Mechanics
Fixed formula with changing inputs
Updated annually using Form 1 data
Established protocols for updates
Uses projected test year
Rate base (based on 13 month average)
O&M, depreciation and taxes
Cost of debt
Annual true-up
incorporated in subsequent year’s formula inputs
Establish
Proj. 2011
Rev.  Req.
Establish
Proj. 2012
Rev. Req.
Start of 2012
Rate Year
Start of 2011
Rate Year
FERC
Form 1
Released
True-up between ’10
Proj. Rev. Req. and
Actual Rev. Req.
Transmission Formula Rate Time Line
UBS Utilities Conference


38
Statutes for Predetermination and CWIP
Predetermination
Utilities can obtain order establishing ratemaking principles that will
apply over the life of the asset
Construction Work in Progress (CWIP)
Utilities can include CWIP in rate cases
UBS Utilities Conference


39
Pension Tracker
Defer as regulatory asset shortfall between funding of GAAP
pension/OPEB expense and pension/OPEB currently authorized
in rates
Maintain minimum funding level equal to GAAP pension/OPEB
expense
Recover deferred expenses through multi-year amortization as
part of next rate case
UBS Utilities Conference


40
Energy Efficiency Initiatives
SmartStar Lawrence smart grid project
Installing
48,000 “smart”
meters
Advanced outage management system
Total project cost of
$40 million
Reduced by 50% DOE match
Expect to implement over 2 -
3 years
Deferred accounting for the cost of energy efficiency initiatives,
such as
Smart thermostats
Customer educational programs
Demand response programs
UBS Utilities Conference


41
Kansas’
Renewable Requirements
Renewable Portfolio Standard established
Installed capability standard in lieu of energy standard
10%
of
peak
load
by
2011,
15%
by
2016
and
20%
after
2020
Implies additional 150 to 200 MW for Westar
If generated in Kansas, treated at 110% of requirement
Relief from standard possible if costs would increase prices >1%
Potential to offset with RECs for initial period
Limited net metering
Limited to 1% of peak demand
Customer’s net metered sales can’t produce net negative sales
Environmental predictability
Legislation precludes state air emission levels from being more
stringent than federal standards
UBS Utilities Conference


42
Capital Structure for Ratemaking (Per Recent Orders)
Capitalization
Ratio
Cost of
Capital
Weighted Cost
of Capital
Pre-tax Weighted
Cost of Capital
Long-term debt
48.66%
6.55%
3.19%
3.19%
Preferred
0.51
4.55
.02
.04
Common
50.83
10.40
5.29
8.77
100.00%
8.50%
12.00%
Capitalization
Ratio
Cost of
Capital
Weighted Cost
of Capital
Pre-tax Weighted
Cost of Capital
Long-term debt
52.38%
6.13%
3.21%
3.21%
Preferred
0.45
4.52
.02
.03
Common
47.17
11.30
5.33
8.82
100.00%
8.56%
12.06%
KCC
FERC Transmission
(1) Incentive ROE of 12.3% for applicable rate base
(1)
UBS Utilities Conference


43
Background
UBS Utilities Conference


44
Westar Energy Legal Structure
Kansas Gas and
Electric Company
Consolidated capital
structure is used for
ratemaking
(Rate regulated utility)
(Rate regulated utility)
Westar Energy, Inc.
Parent
Subsidiary
Combined company
does business under
the name “Westar
Energy”
UBS Utilities Conference


45
Westar’s Plants
Westar's
MW
Operator
Years Installed
Pulverized coal
Jeffrey Energy Center
1,992
Westar
1978, 1980, 1983
Lawrence Energy Center
531
Westar
1954, 1960, 1971
Tecumseh Energy Center
205
Westar
1957, 1962
LaCygne Station
709
KCPL
1973, 1977
Nuclear
Wolf Creek
544
WCNOC (1)
1985
Gas steam turbine
Gordon Evans Energy Center
539
Westar
1961, 1967
Hutchinson Energy Center
167
Westar
1965
Murray Gill Energy Center
293
Westar
1952, 1954, 1956, 1959
Gas combustion turbine
Abilene Energy Center
68
Westar
1973
Gordon Evans Energy Center
294
Westar
2000, 2001
Hutchinson Energy Center
230
Westar
1974, 1975
Spring Creek Energy Center
279
Westar
2001
Tecumseh Energy Center
37
Westar
1972
Emporia Energy Center
663
Westar
2008, 2009
Gas combined cycle
State Line
201
EDE Co.
2001
Wind
Meridian Way
96
Horizon (2)
2008
Central Plains
99
Westar
2009
Flat Ridge
100
Westar (3)
2009
Available generation
At Dec. 31, 2009
7,047
(1)
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Company is a company formed specifically to operate Wolf Creek
for its owners.  WCNOC is governed by a board of directors consisting of the CEO of WCNOC
and senior executives of the plant owners.
(2)
100% of generation purchased under Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
(3)
50% owned and 50% of generation purchased under PPA from BP Alternative Energy
Westar Energy
2010 Results
NERC
5-Year Average
Plant Performance
94.0%
88.0%
92.6%
89.3%
87.0%
90.1%
71.3%
73.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Coal Capacity
Factor
Wolf Creek
Capacity Factor
Coal Availability
Factor
Wolf Creek
Availability
Factor
UBS Utilities Conference


46
Low-Cost Coal Fleet
Very low fuel cost
PRB coal
Excellent rail arrangements
Proximity to mines
Low embedded capital cost
No high-heat rate obsolete
plants
LAC 2 subject to lease agreement
UBS Utilities Conference


47
Westar Energy Coal Fleet
Unit
Capacity
(MW)
WR Share
(MW)
Age
Heat Rate
(Btu/kWh)
Net Book
Value
(Millions)
$/KW
Jeffrey 2
725
          
667
          
30
11,256
200
$        
300
$        
Jeffrey 1
722
          
665
          
32
11,204
216
$        
325
$        
Jeffrey 3
716
          
659
          
27
11,265
325
$        
493
$        
Lawrence 5
371
          
371
          
39
10,713
72
$          
194
$        
La Cygne 1
736
          
368
          
37
10,497
117
$        
318
$        
La Cygne 2
(a)
682
          
341
          
33
10,500
14
$          
41
$          
Tecumseh 8
129
          
129
          
48
11,189
16
$          
124
$        
Lawrence 4
108
          
108
          
50
11,605
41
$          
380
$        
Tecumseh 7
73
            
73
            
53
11,749
28
$          
384
$        
Lawrence 3
50
            
50
            
56
11,707
26
$          
520
$        
3,431
       
(a)  Subject to lease agreement
UBS Utilities Conference


48
Westar Coal Fleet Emission Control Equipment
Unit
Scrubber
Precipitator
Fabric Filter
Low NOx
SCR
Jeffrey 1
Yes
Yes
No plans
Yes
Planned
Jeffrey 2
Yes
Yes
No plans
Planned
No plans
Jeffrey 3
Yes
Yes
No plans
Yes
No plans
La Cygne 1
Yes
NA
Planned
Yes
Yes
La Cygne 2
Planned
Yes
Planned
Planned
Planned
Lawrence 3
No plans
Yes
No plans
Planned
No plans
Lawrence 4
Yes
NA
Planned
Planned
No plans
Lawrence 5
Yes
NA
Planned
Planned
No plans
Tecumseh 7
No plans
Yes
No plans
Yes
No plans
Tecumseh 8
No plans
Yes
No plans
Planned
No plans
NA - Not Applicable
No present projects underway for CO2
UBS Utilities Conference


49
Dramatic Improvement in Air Quality
0
40
80
120
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
20
40
60
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Sulfur Dioxide
76%
(000 tons)
Nitrogen Oxide
49%
(000 tons)
UBS Utilities Conference


50
Westar-operated plant supply (80%)
JEC supply under contract through 2020 (10+ million tons/year)
70% has no market openers
30% reopened on price every 5 years
Next re-pricing will occur in 2013
All volumes have cost escalators
Rail contract through 2013
LEC/TEC supply under contract until 2012 (3.5 million tons/year)
100% at fixed price or capped through 2012
Rail contract through 2013
Co-owned plant supply managed by GXP (20%)
LAC supply (3 million tons/year)
Coal Supply
UBS Utilities Conference