Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - T-REX OIL, INC.ex32.txt
EX-31.1 - T-REX OIL, INC.ex31.txt

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D. C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

     [x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                              EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010

                                       OR

   [x] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                  ACT OF 1934

      For the transition period from _____________ to ___________________.
                        Commission file number: 000-51425

                              Rancher Energy Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

       Nevada                                    98-0422451
--------------------                            ------------


                          999 - 18th Street, Suite 3400
                                Denver, CO 80202
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (303) 629-1125
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements  for the past 90 days. Yes [x]  No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted  electronically  and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every  Interactive  Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of
this Chapter)  during the  preceding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large  accelerated  filer, an
accelerated  filer, or a  non-accelerated  filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [_]                     Accelerated filer [_]
Non-accelerated filer [_] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Small  reporting  company [x]



                                       1

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [_] No [x] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [_] No [x] As of February 14, 2011, 119,316,723 shares of Rancher Energy Corp. common stock, $.00001 par value, were outstanding. 2
Rancher Energy Corp. Table of Contents PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Unaudited Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.............................. 4 Unaudited Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.................................................................. 6 Unaudited Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the Nine Months ended December 31, 2010............................................................................ 8 Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009................................................................... 9 Notes to Financial Statements.................................................................... 10 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations............ 21 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk....................................... 29 Item 4. Controls and Procedures.......................................................................... 30 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings............................................................................... 30 Item 1A. Risk Factors................................................................................... 31 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds..................................... 31 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities................................................................. 31 Item 4. Rescinded and Reserved.......................................................................... 31 Item 5. Other Information............................................................................... 31 Item 6. Exhibits....................................................................................... 31 SIGNATURES............................................................................................... 32 3
Part I. Financial Information. Item 1. Financial Statements Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor in Possession Balance Sheets Unaudited ASSETS December 31, 2010 March 31, 2010 ----------------- -------------- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 307,178 $ 372,286 Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses 671,007 615,602 ---------------------- ------------------- Total current assets 978,185 987,888 ---------------------- ------------------- Oil and gas properties at cost (successful efforts method): Unproved 53,073,689 53,030,814 Proved 19,572,699 19,432,703 Less: Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment (57,299,336) (56,355,224) ---------------------- ------------------- Net oil and gas properties 15,347,052 16,108,293 ---------------------- ------------------- Other assets: Furniture and equipment net of accumulated depreciation of $683,731 and $568,529 respectively 461,622 574,938 Other assets 878,895 914,097 ---------------------- ------------------- Total other assets 1,340,517 1,489,035 ---------------------- ------------------- Total assets $17,665,754 $18,585,216 ====================== =================== (Continued) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 4
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor in Possession Balance Sheets Unaudited (Continued) LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY December 31, 2010 March 31, 2010 ----------------- -------------- Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities - post petition $ 4,845,033 $ 1,698,488 Asset retirement obligation 126,334 174,332 Note payable 10,089,987 10,089,987 --------------------- --------------------- Total current liabilities 15,061,354 11,962,807 --------------------- --------------------- Long-term liabilities: Asset retirement obligation 1,370,629 1,255,497 --------------------- --------------------- Total long-term liabilities 1,370,629 1,255,497 --------------------- --------------------- Total liabilities not subject to compromise 16,431,983 13,218,304 Liabilities subject to compromise 1,462,043 1,336,133 --------------------- --------------------- Total liabilities 17,894,026 14,554,437 --------------------- --------------------- Contingencies (Notes 2, 4, 7 and 8) Stockholders' (deficit) equity: Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 275,000,000 shares authorized, 119,316,700 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 1,194 1,194 Additional paid-in capital 93,193,008 93,025,876 Accumulated deficit (93,422,474) (88,996,291) --------------------- --------------------- Total stockholders' (deficit) equity (228,272) 4,030,779 --------------------- --------------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity $17,665,754 $18,585,216 ===================== ===================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 5
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor In Possession Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Three Months Ended December 31, Revenues: 2010 2009 ---- ---- Oil & gas sales $ 1,211,679 $ 970,502 Derivative losses - (6,809) ------------------------ ------------------------- 1,211,679 963,693 ------------------------ ------------------------- Operating expenses: Production taxes 149,295 143,769 Lease operating 545,150 411,150 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 338,678 299,184 Accretion 43,650 38,821 Impairment of unproved properties - 13,525,642 Exploration 6,568 3,340 General and administrative 420,848 568,717 ------------------------ ------------------------- Total operating expenses 1,504,189 14,990,623 ------------------------ ------------------------- Loss from operations (292,510) (14,026,930) ------------------------ ------------------------- Other income (expense): Amortization of deferred finance costs and discount on note payable - (239,106) Interest expense (735,733) (460,165) Interest and other income 5,684 7 ------------------------ ------------------------- Total other income (expense) (730,049) (699,264) ------------------------ ------------------------- Loss before reorganization items (1,022,559) (14,726,194) Reorganization items: Professional and legal fees 418,804 158,727 ------------------------ ------------------------- Net loss $ (1,441,363) $ (14,884,921) ======================== ========================= Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.01) $(0.12) ======================== ========================= Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 119,316,700 119,316,700 ======================== ========================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 6
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor In Possession Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Nine Months Ended December 31, Revenues: 2010 2009 ---- ---- Oil & gas sales $ 3,536,968 $ 2,498,376 Derivative losses - (357,582) ------------------------- ------------------------- 3,536,968 2,140,794 ------------------------- ------------------------- Operating expenses: Production taxes 444,303 338,547 Lease operating 1,837,267 1,088,163 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,065,425 868,263 Accretion 130,207 119,480 Impairment of unproved properties - 13,525,642 Exploration 25,655 15,172 General and administrative 1,656,417 2,066,226 ------------------------- ------------------------- Total operating expenses 5,159,274 18,021,493 ------------------------- ------------------------- Loss from operations (1,622,306) (15,880,699) ------------------------- ------------------------- Other income (expense): Amortization of deferred finance costs and discount on note payable - (1,770,789) Interest expense (1,682,787) (1,250,859) Interest and other income 17,250 731 ------------------------- ------------------------- Total other income (expense) (1,665,537) (3,020,917) ------------------------- ------------------------- Loss before reorganization items (3,287,843) (18,901,616) Reorganization items: Professional and legal fees 1,138,340 158,727 ------------------------- ------------------------- Net loss $(4,426,183) $(19,060,343) ========================= ========================= Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.04) $(0.16) ========================= ========================= Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding 119,316,700 119,357,245 ========================= ========================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 7
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor In Possession Statement of Changes in Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) Total Additional Stockholders' Paid-In Accumulated (Deficit) - Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity ------ ------ ------- ------- ------ Balance, April 1, 2010 119,316,700 $1,194 $93,025,876 $(88,996,291) $4,030,779 Stock-based compensation - - 167,132 - 167,132 Net loss - - - (4,426,183) (4,426,183) ---------------- ---------- --------------- ----------------- ----------------- Balance, December 31, 2010 119,316,700 $1,194 $93,193,008 $(93,422,474) $ (228,272) ================ ========== =============== ================= ================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 8
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor In Possession Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 2009 Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(4,426,183) $(19,060,343) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used for operating activities: Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 1,065,425 868,263 Impairment of unproved properties - 13,525,642 Reorganization items, net 1,138,340 158,727 Accretion expense 130,207 119,480 Interest expense converted to short-term debt - 188,112 Interest expense beneficial conversion feature, convertible notes payable - 105,000 Amortization of deferred financing costs and discount on note payable - 1,665,789 Unrealized losses on derivative activities - 455,960 Stock-based compensation expense 167,132 210,829 Services exchanged for common stock - directors - 51,700 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses (55,405) (199,375) Other assets 29,130 19,205 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 2,761,740 1,154,390 Asset retirement obligation settlements (63,074) - -------------------- ------------------------- Net cash from (used for) operating activities, before reorganization 747,312 (736,621) Cash effect of reorganization items (627,662) (56,519) -------------------- ------------------------- Net cash from (used for) operating activities 119,650 (793,140) -------------------- ------------------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Capital expenditures for oil and gas properties (182,872) (3,805) Proceeds from sale of other assets - 10,760 Increase in furniture and equipment (1,885) - -------------------- ------------------------- Net cash (used for) from investing activities (184,757) 6,955 -------------------- ------------------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Repayment of debt - (98,125) Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable - 140,000 Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options - 5 -------------------- ------------------------- Net cash from financing activities - 41,880 -------------------- ------------------------- Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (65,107) (744,305) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 372,285 917,160 -------------------- ------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $307,178 $172,855 ==================== ========================= Supplemental Statement of Cash Flow Information: Cash paid for interest - $613,479 ==================== ========================= Non-cash investing and financing activities: Deferred finance costs, conveyance net profits interest - $1,500,000 ==================== ========================= 9
Rancher Energy Corp. Debtor in Possession Notes to Financial Statements For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Organization Rancher Energy Corp. ("Rancher Energy" or the "Company") was incorporated in the state of Nevada on February 4, 2004. The Company acquires, explores for, develops and produces oil and natural gas, concentrating on applying secondary and tertiary recovery technology to older, historically productive fields in North America. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited financial statements include the accounts of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Rancher Energy Wyoming, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company that was formed on April 24, 2007. In management's opinion, the Company has made all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. They do not include all information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change in the information disclosed in the notes to financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Bankruptcy Filing On October 28, 2009, the Company filed a voluntary petition (the "petition") for reorganization relief ("the Bankruptcy Filing") in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Company will continue to operate its business as "debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. See Note 2 "Proceedings Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code" for details regarding the Bankruptcy Filing and the Chapter 11 case. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and extinguishment of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the petition raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to remain a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern may be contingent upon, among other things, its ability (i) to obtain Debtor-in-Possession financing; (ii) to reduce administrative, operating and interest costs and liabilities through the bankruptcy process; (iii) to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; (iv) to obtain confirmation of a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code; and (v) to obtain financing to facilitate an exit from bankruptcy. We are currently evaluating various courses of action to address the operational and liquidity issues the Company is facing and are in the process of formulating plans for improving operations. There can be no assurance that any of these efforts will be successful. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should we be unable to continue as a going concern. In the event the Company's restructuring activities are not successful, additional significant adjustments in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the revenues and expenses reported and the balance sheet classifications used may be necessary. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 852-10 "Financial Reporting During Reorganization Proceedings," which is applicable to companies in Chapter 11, generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared. However, it does 10
require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the filing of a Chapter 11 case distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization and restructuring of the business must be reported separately as reorganization items in the statements of operations beginning in the period ending December 31, 2009. The balance sheet must distinguish pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise from both those pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by a plan of reorganization must be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may settled for lesser amounts. In addition, cash provided by reorganization items, if any, must be disclosed separately in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted FASB ASC 852-10 effective on October 28, 2009 and currently segregates those items as outlined above for all reporting periods subsequent to such date. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of oil and gas reserves, assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates of oil and gas reserve quantities provide the basis for calculations of depletion, depreciation, and amortization (DD&A) and impairment, each of which represents a significant component of the financial statements. Oil and Gas Producing Activities The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. Under this method of accounting, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not find proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense. Exploratory dry hole costs are included in cash flows from investing activities as part of capital expenditures within the statements of cash flows. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether or not proved reserves are found. Costs of unproved leases, which may become productive, are reclassified to proved properties when proved reserves are discovered on the property. Unproved oil and gas interests are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value and are not subject to amortization. Geological and geophysical costs and the costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed as incurred. DD&A of capitalized costs related to proved oil and gas properties is calculated on a property-by-property basis using the units-of-production method based upon proved reserves. The computation of DD&A takes into consideration restoration, dismantlement, and abandonment costs and the anticipated proceeds from salvaging equipment. The Company complies with FASB ASC932-360 "Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas." The Company currently does not have any existing capitalized exploratory well costs, and has therefore determined that no suspended well costs should be impaired. The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairments when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The impairment test for proved properties compares the expected undiscounted future net cash flows on a property-by-property basis with the related net capitalized costs, including costs associated with asset retirement obligations, at the end of each reporting period. Expected future cash flows are calculated on all proved reserves using a discount rate and price forecasts selected by the Company's management. The discount rate is a rate that management believes is representative of current market conditions. The price forecast is based on NYMEX strip pricing, adjusted for basis and quality differentials, for the first three to five years and is held constant thereafter. Operating costs are also adjusted as deemed appropriate for these estimates. When the net capitalized costs exceed the undiscounted future net revenues of a field, the cost of the field is reduced to fair value, which is determined using discounted future net revenues. An impairment allowance is provided on unproved property when the Company determines the property will not be developed or the carrying value is not realizable. 11
Capitalized Interest The Company's policy is to capitalize interest costs to oil and gas properties on expenditures made in connection with exploration, development and construction projects that are not subject to current DD&A and that require greater than six months to be readied for their intended use ("qualifying projects"). Interest is capitalized only for the period that such activities are in progress. To date the Company has had no such qualifying projects during periods when interest expense has been incurred. Accordingly the Company has recorded no capitalized interest. Commodity Derivatives As of December 31, 2010, the Company has no hedges or other derivative positions in place. Net Profits Interest The Company assigned a 10% Net Profits Interest (NPI) to its Lender, under the terms of the Eighth Amendment to the Term Credit Agreement (see NOTE 6 - Short-Term Note Payable). Net profit is defined as the excess of the sum of crude oil proceeds plus hedge settlements, over the sum of lease operating, marketing, transportation and production tax expenses. The Company is obligated to pay to the Lender 10% of such excess, if any, on a monthly basis, so long as the NPI remains in effect. The Company records amounts due under the NPI as operating expense. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company recognized $143,710 and $107,681 respectively as NPI expense, including such amount as lease operating expense in its Statement of Operations. Net Loss Per Share Basic net loss per common share of stock is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted-average of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per common share is calculated by dividing adjusted net loss by the weighted-average of common shares outstanding, including the effect of other dilutive securities. The Company's potentially dilutive securities consist of in-the-money outstanding options and warrants to purchase the Company's common stock. Diluted net loss per common share does not give effect to dilutive securities as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The treasury stock method is used to measure the dilutive impact of stock options and warrants. The following table details the weighted-average dilutive and anti-dilutive securities related to stock options and warrants for the periods presented: For the Nine Months Ended December 31, -------------------------------------- 2010 2009 ---- ---- Dilutive - - Anti-dilutive 66,523,564 57,961,019 Reclassification Certain amounts in the fiscal 2010 financial statements have been re- classified to conform to the fiscal 2011 financial statement presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net loss. Other Significant Accounting Policies Other accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 1 to the Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, and are supplemented in the Notes to Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended December 31, 2010. These unaudited financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010. 12
Recent Accounting Pronouncement In January 2010, ASC guidance for fair value measurements and disclosure was updated to require additional disclosures related to transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and enhanced detail in the level 3 reconciliation. The guidance was amended to clarify the level of disaggregation required for assets and liabilities and the disclosures required for inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities that fall in either level 2 or level 3. The updated guidance was effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning April 1, 2010, with the exception of the level 3 disaggregation which is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning April 1, 2011. The adoption had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 5 "Fair Value Measurement" herein for further details regarding the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value. There were various other accounting standards and interpretations issued in 2010 and 2009, none of which had a material impact on the Company's financial position, operations or cash flows. Note 2 - Proceedings Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code As discussed in Note 1 above, on October 28, 2009 (the "Petition Date"), the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court. The Chapter 11 Case is being administered under the caption Rancher Energy Corp., Debtor, Chapter 11 Case No. 09-32943-MER. The Company continues to operate its business as debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. As debtors-in-possession, the Debtors are authorized to continue to operate as ongoing businesses, and may pay all debts and honor all obligations arising in the ordinary course of their businesses after the Petition Date. However, the Debtors may not pay creditors on account of obligations arising before the Petition Date or engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without approval of the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing. Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoins, or stays, the continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against the Company or its property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the Company, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the Company, or to collect on or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay with respect thereto. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Company may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including, without limitation, leases of real property and equipment, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. As of the date of the filing of the Chapter 11 Case, no party, subject to certain exceptions, may take any action, also subject to certain exceptions, to recover on pre-petition claims against the Debtors. Under the priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code, unless creditors agree otherwise, post-petition liabilities and pre-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before shareholders of the Company are entitled to receive any distribution or retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery, if any, to creditors and shareholders of the Company will not be determined until confirmation and consummation of a plan of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the Chapter 11 case to each of these constituencies or what types or amounts of distributions, if any, they would receive. At this time, it is not possible to predict with certainty the effect of the Chapter 11 Case on the Company's business or various creditors, or when the Company will emerge from these proceedings. The Company's future results depend upon the confirmation and successful implementation, on a timely basis, of a Plan of Reorganization. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern may depend upon, among other things, (i) the Company's ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the cash collateral orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court in 13
connection with the Bankruptcy Case; (ii) the ability of the Company to generate cash from operations; (iii) the ability of the Company to maintain adequate cash on hand; (iv) the ability of the Company to obtain confirmation of and to consummate a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code; and, (v) the cost, duration and outcome of the reorganization process. Uncertainty as to the outcome of these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has initiated specific actions related to obtaining Debtor in Possession (DIP) financing and sale of assets. While there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, the accompanying unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. (See Note 11 - Subsequent Events) The uncertainty resulting from the Bankruptcy Filing may hinder the Company's ongoing business activities and its ability to operate, fund and execute its business plan by impairing relations with property owners and potential lessees, vendors and service providers; negatively impact the ability of the Company to attract, retain and compensate key executives and employees and to retain employees generally; limit the Company's ability to obtain trade credit; and limit the Company's ability to maintain and exploit existing properties and acquire and develop new properties. As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities are subject to uncertainty. While operating as a debtor-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11, and subject to Bankruptcy Court approval or otherwise as permitted in the normal course of business, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts other than those reflected in the condensed financial statements. Our historical financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments to the carrying value of assets or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary as a consequence of confirmation of a plan of reorganization. In order to successfully exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Company will need to obtain Bankruptcy Court confirmation of, a plan of reorganization that satisfies the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. A plan of reorganization would, among other things, resolve the Debtors' pre-petition obligations, set forth the revised capital structure of the newly reorganized entity and provide for corporate governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy. On October 15, 2010, the Company filed with the Court its proposed Debtor's Plan of Reorganization and a proposed Disclosure Statement was filed simultaneously with the Plan. On December 13, 2010, the Company filed with the Court its First Amended Proposed Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement. The Disclosure Statement must be first approved by the Bankruptcy Court before creditors and shareholders are presented with the opportunity to vote on the Plan. Prior to confirmation and approval by the Court, the Proposed Plan of Reorganization is subject to amendment. On December 15, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to approve financing from a party not affiliated with its present lender. The purpose of the loan is to repay the existing lender in full and to pay certain past due ad valorem taxes owed to Converse County, Wyoming. Converse County has agreed that if it is paid by February 1, 2011, it will waive penalties and interest of approximately $93,000 (See Note 11 - Subsequent Events). On December 20, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to allow the Company to enter into an agreement and approve the sale of substantially all its assets to the same party providing the new financing for the price of approximately $20.0 million. (See Note 11 - Subsequent Events). Reorganization Items Reorganization items represent the direct and incremental costs related to the Company's Chapter 11 case, such as professional fees incurred, net of interest income earned on accumulated cash during the Chapter 11 process. These restructuring activities may result in additional charges and other adjustments for expected allowed claims (including claims that have been allowed by the Court) and other reorganization items that could be material to the Company's financial position or results of operations in any given period. Liabilities Subject to Compromise Liabilities subject to compromise at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 include the following pre-petition liabilities: December 31, March 31, 2010 2010 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accounts payable, trade $176,726 $164,390 Damages pursuant to claim settlements 375,000 - Other payables and accrued liabilities 243,358 265,516 Property and ad valorem taxes payable 526,959 766,227 Convertible notes payable 140,000 140,000 ------------------------------------------- Total liabilities subject to compromise $1,462,043 $1,336,133 =========================================== 14
Note 3--Oil and Gas Properties The Company's oil and gas properties are summarized in the following table: December 31, March 31, 2010 2010 Proved properties $19,572,699 $19,432,703 Unproved properties excluded from DD&A 52,738,557 52,716,480 Equipment and other 335,132 314,334 ------------------ -------------------- Total oil and gas properties 72,646,388 72,463,517 Less accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment (57,299,336) (56,355,224) ------------------ -------------------- $15,347,052 $16,108,293 ================== ==================== Note 4 - Asset Retirement Obligations The Company recognizes an estimated liability for future costs associated with the abandonment of its oil and gas properties. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation and a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset are recorded at the time a well is completed or acquired. The increase in carrying value is included in proved oil and gas properties in the balance sheets. The Company depletes the amount added to proved oil and gas property costs and recognizes accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining estimated economic lives of the respective oil and gas properties. Cash paid to settle asset retirement obligations are included in the operating section of the Company's statements of cash flows. The Company's estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on historical experience in abandoning wells, estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised, as appropriate. Revisions to the liability result from changes in estimated abandonment costs, changes in well economic lives, or if federal or state regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of wells. A reconciliation of the Company's asset retirement obligation liability during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows: 2010 2009 ---- ---- Beginning asset retirement obligations $1,429,830 $1,280,680 Liabilities incurred - - Liabilities settled (63,074) - Changes in estimates - - Accretion expense 130,207 119,480 ------------------- ----------------- Ending asset retirement obligation $1,496,963 $1,400,160 =================== ================= Current $126,334 $122,269 Long-term 1,370,629 1,277,891 ------------------- ----------------- $1,496,963 $1,400,160 =================== ================= 15
Note 5 -- Fair Value Measurements The Company complies with FASB ASC 820-10 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" which defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company's assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows: o Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; o Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or o Level 3: Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations. FASB ASC 820-10 requires financial assets and liabilities to be classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has no hedge or other derivative positions in place. The Company's sole derivative financial instrument, a participating cap costless collar agreement expired during in the prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2010. Prior to expiration, the fair value of the costless collar agreement was determined based on both observable and unobservable pricing inputs and therefore, the data sources utilized in these valuation models were considered level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. In the Company's adoption of FASB ASC 820-10-05, it considered the impact of counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its assets and its own credit risk in the valuation of its liabilities that are presented at fair value. The Company established the fair value of its derivative instruments using a published index price, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and other factors including volatility, time value and the counterparty's credit adjusted risk free interest rate. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy: 2010 2009 ------------ ------------- Balance as of April 1 $ - $455,960 Total gains (losses) (realized or unrealized): Included in earnings - (357,582) Included in other comprehensive income - - Purchased, issuances and settlements - (98,378) Transfers in and out of Level 3 - - ------------ ------------- Balance as of December 31 $ - $ - ============ ============= Note 6- Short-Term Note Payable On October 16, 2007, the Company issued a Note Payable (the "Note") in the amount of $12,240,000 pursuant to a Term Credit Agreement with a financial institution (the "Lender"). All amounts outstanding under the Note were originally due and payable on October 31, 2008 (the "Maturity Date") and bore interest at a rate equal to the greatest of (a) 12% per annum and (b) the 16
one-month LIBOR rate plus 6% per annum. The Note was amended on October 22, 2008, (the "First Amendment"), to extend the Maturity Date by six months from October 31, 2008 to April 30, 2009. In consideration of the six month extension and other terms included in First Amendment, the Company made a principal payment to the Lender in the amount of $2,240,000, resulting in a new loan balance of $10,000,000. The Note was amended six times between April 30, and May 27, 2009 to extend the Maturity Date for short periods of time while the Lender and the Company finalized the terms of a longer extension. On June 3, 2009 the Note was again amended (the "Eighth Amendment") to among other things extend the maturity date until October 15, 2009. The Company did not make payment of the principal and accrued interest on the maturity date, October 15, 2009. The Company's obligations under the Term Credit Agreement, as amended, are collateralized by a first priority security interest in its properties and assets, including all rights under oil and gas leases in its three producing oil fields in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and all of its equipment on those properties. Under the terms of the original Term Credit Agreement, the Company granted the Lender a 2% Overriding Royalty Interest (ORRI), proportionally reduced when the Company's working interest is less than 100%, in all crude oil and natural gas produced from its three Powder River Basin fields. The First Amendment granted an increase in the proportionate overriding royalty interests ("ORRI") assigned to the Lender from 2% to 3%. The Company estimated the fair value of the 2% ORRI granted to the Lender to be approximately $4,500,000 and the value of the increase ORRI to be approximately $1,050,000. These amounts were recorded as discounts to the Note Payable and as decreases of oil and gas properties. The Eighth Amendment granted a Conveyance of Net Profits to the Lender. The Company estimated the fair value of the 10% NPI to be approximately $1,500,000. This amount was recorded as deferred finance costs and was amortized over the term of the Note, as amended. As noted above, the Note Payable issued by the Company on October 16, 2007, matured on October 15, 2009. Payment of the principal balance of approximately $10,188,000, plus accrued interest, was not made on the maturity date, and therefore, an event of default occurred under the Term Credit Agreement, as amended. On November 16, 2009, the Lender presented to the Company a Notice of Event of Default, a Demand for Payment and a Notice of Intent to Foreclose (collectively "the Notice"). The Notice declared all of the obligations immediately due and payable and demands that the Company promptly pay to Lender all of the obligations within ten days of receipt of the Notice, and states that if the Company fails to pay the obligations in full as demanded, the Lender intends to foreclose on the secured properties under the terms of the Term Credit Agreement and other agreements. Effective as the date of the Notice, the Lender has claimed that interest under the Credit agreement will accrue at the default rate, 18% compounded monthly, and the percentage of net revenue to be applied for debt service and other obligations shall be 100%. (See Note 11 - Subsequent Events) On October 16, 2009, the Lender gave instructions to the Company's bank (the "Instruction") that under the terms of the Restricted Account and Securities Control Agreement executed in conjunction with the Term Credit Agreement, that as of the date of the Instruction, the Company shall no longer have access to any funds held in identified accounts, and the Lender now had exclusive right to direct the disposition of such funds. On October 21, 2009 the Company's bank transferred the all remaining funds from the Company's account to the Lender. Under the terms of the Term Credit Agreement, the Company is obligated to reimburse the Lender for all expenses, including reasonable legal fees incurred in connection with the administration, amendment, enforcement of the Agreement or Lender's rights and remedies under the Loan Documents. In connection with the Company's bankruptcy proceedings, the Lender has incurred legal fees and other expenses that could be covered by the above provisions. As of December 31, 2010 the Company had received invoices from the Lender requesting reimbursement of $673,000. These expenses are reported in reorganization expense for professional and legal fees in the consolidated statement of operations. A portion of these costs are being disputed by the Company and pending determination by the Bankruptcy Court, may become a part of the secured claim of the Lender, become a general unsecured claim, or disallowed as a claim against the Company. As discussed in Note 1 and Note 2 above, on October 28, 2009, the Company filed a voluntary petition (the "petition") for relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoins, or stays, the continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against the Company 17
or its property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the Company, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the Company, or to collect on or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay. Note 7- Convertible Promissory Notes Payable On October 27, 2009, the Company issued Convertible Promissory Notes (the "Promissory Notes") totaling $140,000 in consideration for money loaned to the Company of equal amount. One hundred thousand dollars of the Promissory Notes were issued to four officers and/or directors ($25,000 each). The remainder of the Promissory Notes were issued to existing shareholders. The Promissory Notes bear interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 12%, or (ii) the prime rate (as published in the Wall Street Journal) plus 3%. The Promissory Notes matured on November 1, 2010, and all obligations and payments due under the Promissory Notes are subordinate to the Company's senior debt. Principal and accrued interest were due on maturity date. The Promissory Notes are convertible, at the holder's option, into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $0.02 per share, at any time during the term of the Promissory Notes. The Company defaulted on these notes by failure to pay principal and accumulated interest when due. As discussed in Note 1 and Note 2 above, on October 28, 2009, the Company filed a voluntary petition (the "petition") for relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoins, or stays, the continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions against the Company or its property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Note 8 - Contingencies Pending Litigation On February 12, 2010, the Company filed an adversary action in the Bankruptcy Court against the holder of the senior secured note payable (see NOTE 6 - Short Term Note Payable) seeking to avoid certain ownership interests assigned to the Lender in connection with the Term Credit Agreement and amendments thereto. On March 18, 2010, the Lender filed a motion with the Court to dismiss the complaint. On October 21, 2010, the Court issued an order on the Motion to Dismiss dismissing three of the nine claims made in the adversary action. The Company plans to pursue the remaining six claims. The Company is unable to predict a likely outcome or estimate the possible benefit should the Company prevail in the litigation. Bankruptcy Proceedings: On October 29, 2009, the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company operates the business as a debtor-in-possession in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11, and will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. All pending or threatened litigation or claims involving the Company were automatically stayed as a result of this Bankruptcy Filing, and all such claims may be subject to compromise or modification through the terms of any Plan of Reorganization filed by the Company in the Chapter 11 proceedings. Threatened Litigation In a letter dated February 18, 2009 sent to each of the Company's Directors, attorneys representing a group of persons who purchased approximately $1,800,000 of securities (in the aggregate) in the Company's private placement offering commenced in late 2006, alleged that securities laws were violated in that offering. In April 2009, the Company entered into tolling agreements with the purchasers to toll the statutes of limitations applicable to any claims related to the private placement. The Company's Board of Directors directed the Special Committee to investigate these allegations. The Company denies the allegations and believes they are without merit. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of a lawsuit being filed, its possible outcome, or estimate a range of possible losses, if any, that could result in the event of an adverse verdict in any such lawsuit. Any suit against the Company is stayed by the Chapter 11 case, and, insofar as these claims are asserted against the Company, they are subject to the claim process imposed by the Bankruptcy Code and the possible subordination under Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. 18
Note 9 - Income Taxes As of December 31, 2010, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that its net deferred tax assets, consisting primarily of net operating losses, will not be utilized in the future, the Company has fully provided for a valuation of its net deferred tax assets. The Company is subject to United States federal income tax and income tax from multiple state jurisdictions. Currently, the Internal Revenue Service is not reviewing any of the Company's federal income tax returns, and agencies in states where the Company conducts business are not reviewing any of the Company's state income tax returns. All tax years remain subject to examination by tax authorities, including for the period from February 4, 2004 through March 31, 2010. Note 10--Share-Based Compensation Grant of Options to Directors On October 27, 2009, in conjunction with the execution of Management Retention Agreements (the "Retention Agreement"), each of the Company's four directors was granted options to purchase 2,500,000 share of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.035 per share. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense relating to the Director's options of $133,628 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010. There is no remaining compensation expense relating to the unvested options as of December 31, 2010. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan As of December 31, 2010, there were 1,441,000 options outstanding under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and 8,559,000 options are available for issuance. Total estimated unrecognized compensation cost from unvested stock options issues under the Plan as of December 31, 2010 was approximately $0. Note 11--Subsequent Events On January 26, 2011, the Court granted the Company's Motion to Approve Debtor-In-Possession Secured Financing. On January 28, 2011 the Company received debtor-in-possession financing ("DIP financing") pursuant to a credit agreement (the "DIP Credit Agreement") with a lender not related to the pre-petition credit facility provider. The DIP Credit Agreement provides for loan advances up to an aggregate of $14,700,000, and matures May 28, 2011 (120 days after closing date).. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay the allowed, secured claim for past due ad valorem property taxes, pay the allowed, secured claim of the current lender (see note 6) and fund $100,000 to be retained to the close the Bankruptcy Estate if no plan or reorganization is successful. The DIP Credit Agreement specifies interest at the rate of 10% for the 60 days following closing and 12% interest for the period commencing on the 61st day through loan maturity. Accumulated interest and principal is due in full at maturity. The Lender obtained a valid and perfected first priority security interest in and liens on all the collateral including, but not limited to: (a) Rancher's interests in oil and gas producing properties; (b) accounts receivable; (c)equipment; (d) general intangibles; (e) accounts; (f) deposit accounts; and (g) all other real and personal property of the Company. The Lender has the right to credit bid the loan balance against the purchase price of Rancher's assets. On February 16, the Bankruptcy Court approved the order authorizing the sale of substantially all of the Company's assets for a purchase price of approximately $20 million. The closing and settlement dates for the sale are yet to be determined. 19
Note 12--Related Party Transactions A director of the Company is a partner in the law firm that acts as counsel to the Company. The Company paid legal fees and expenses to the law firm in the amount of approximately $61,000 and $2,000 during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amount owed to the law firm was $59,000 and $0 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A director of the Company is a partner in a firm that provides field supervision and consulting services to the Company. The Company paid fees and expenses to the firm in the amount of approximately $84,000 and $9,000 during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amount owed to the firm was $43,000 and $28,000 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 20
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations - Need to update from here forward Forward-Looking Statements The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical are "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, among others, the following: o business strategy; o ability to raise debtor in possession financing and the terms thereof; o ability to develop a plan of reorganization acceptable to the Bankruptcy Court and to emerge from bankruptcy; o ability to complete a sale of the Company, all or a significant portion of its assets or financing or other strategic alternatives; o ability to obtain the financial resources to continue operations, to repay secured debt, to enhance current production and to conduct the EOR projects; o water availability and waterflood production targets; o carbon dioxide (CO2) availability, deliverability, and tertiary production targets; o construction of surface facilities for waterflood and CO2 operations and a CO2pipeline; o inventories, projects, and programs; o other anticipated capital expenditures and budgets; o future cash flows and borrowings; o the availability and terms of financing; o oil reserves; o reservoir response to water and CO2 injection; o ability to obtain permits and governmental approvals; o technology; o financial strategy; o realized oil prices; o production; o lease operating expenses, general and administrative costs, and finding and development costs; o availability and costs of drilling rigs and field services; o future operating results; o plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions; and These statements may be found under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as "may," "could," "should," "expect," "plan," "project," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "pursue," "target" or "continue," the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, although some forward-looking statements may be expressed differently. 21
The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are largely based on our expectations, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by our management. These estimates and assumptions reflect our best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors. Although we believe such estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. In addition, management's assumptions about future events may prove to be inaccurate. Management cautions all readers that the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and we cannot assure any reader that such statements will be realized or the forward-looking events and circumstances will occur. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements due to the factors listed in the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. Proceedings under Chapter 11 We acquired our oilfields in late 2006 and early 2007 with the intention of significantly increasing crude oil production through an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project utilizing modern CO2 injection techniques. The planned EOR project required a significant amount of capital to carry out. In October 2007, we borrowed $12.24 million from GasRock Capital LLC (GasRock), an investment bank, to serve as a "bridge loan" to enable us to complete plans for the EOR project while we sought a larger, longer-term source of capital to conduct the project. At least partially due to the severe disruptions in credit and financial markets, coupled with extreme volatility in crude oil prices, we were not successful in raising the capital to repay the bridge loan and commence the project. Following a series of amendments to the GasRock loan agreement and extensions of the maturity date, we were unable to repay the loan on the amended due date of October 15, 2009. On October 16, 2009, GasRock notified us the failure to repay the loan constituted an event of default and notified us of their intention to foreclose on the assets pledged as collateral for the loan. GasRock instructed our bank to transfer all cash we had on deposit to GasRock, leaving us without funds to operate the oilfields or pay overhead. On October 28, 2009, we filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado (the "Court") (Case number 09-32943) We will continue to operate our business as "debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the order of the Court, as we devote renewed efforts to resolve our liquidity problems and develop a reorganization plan. In November 2009, the Court granted our motion for interim use of cash collateral. We immediately took steps to reduce operating costs and overhead, including salary cuts of 10% - 20% for employees and the rejection of the office lease for our corporate headquarters. In addition we implemented a program of repair and remediation on a number wells that had become non-producing , resulting in a 25% increase in daily crude oil production as compared to pre-petition production levels. On October 15, 2010, the Company filed with the Court its proposed Debtor's Plan of Reorganization ("Proposed Plan of Reorganization"). A proposed Disclosure Statement was filed simultaneously with the Plan. On December 13, 2010, the Company filed with the Court its First Amended Proposed Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement for the amended Plan. The Disclosure Statement must be first approved by the Bankruptcy Court before it may be sent to creditors along with the proposed Plan for voting on the Plan. Prior to confirmation and approval by the Court, the Proposed Plan of Reorganization is subject to amendment. On December 15, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to approve financing from a party not affiliated with its present lender. The purpose of the loan is to repay the existing lender in full and to pay certain past due ad valorem taxes On December 20, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to approve the sale of substantially all its assets to the same third party providing the loan for the price of approximately $20.0 million. On February 16, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving the Motion to sell substantially all of the Company's assets. A closing and settlement date for the sale has not been determined, at the time of this filing. 22
On January 26, 2011, the Court granted the Company's Motion from December 15, 2010 to Approve Debtor-In-Possession Secured Financing ("DIP Financing"). The DIP Financing Agreement authorizes the Company to borrow up to a maximum of $14,700,000 from the lender, for the limited purposes of: (a) paying the prior lender secured debt in full; (b) holding a Carve-Out Reserve Amount ($100,000 to be used to pay actual administrative expenses) in a Carve-Out Account until the close of the Sale; (c) paying pre-petition ad valorem taxes with respect to property located in Wyoming; (d) funding the Escrow Amount into an interest bearing account to be maintained and disbursed pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Escrow Agreement; and (e) other purposes with the prior written consent of Lender, in its sole and absolute discretion. In exchange for such funds, the Company will grant to the Lender valid and perfected first priority security interests in and liens on all of Rancher's assets ("the Collateral"), which Collateral includes but is not limited to (a) Rancher's interests in oil and gas producing properties; (b) accounts receivable; (c) equipment; (d) general intangibles; (e) accounts; (f) deposit accounts; and (g) all other real and personal property of Rancher, except for the Carve-Out Amount. On January 28, 2011, the DIP Credit Agreement was closed and funded. On the date of loan closing proceeds of the loan were disbursed in accordance with the DIP Credit Agreement as follows: o To pay the allowed, secured claim for past due ad valorem property taxes in the amount of $532,000. o To pay the secured claim of the current lender in the amount of $13,653,698 (see note 6) representing principal outstanding, unpaid interest, and all fees and expenses allowed per the terms of the credit agreement. o To fund an escrow account established per the Order issued by the Bankruptcy Court granting the motion to approve debtor in possession secured financing. The escrow account was established with the Company, prior lender, and current lender as parties until the Bankruptcy Court enters a final order regarding certain fees and costs claimed by the prior lender. o The remaining balance was used to fund a portion of the Lender loan fees and expenses of $186,235. Organization We are an independent energy company that explores for and develops produces, and markets oil and gas in North America. We operate four oil fields in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Our long term business plan is to use CO2 injection to increase oil production in these oil fields. Since August 2008 we have been exploring alternatives to improve liquidity, including raising capital, refinancing outstanding debt, applying for a Department of Energy Grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or the potential sale of the Company or a significant portion of its assets. Due to volatile commodity prices and the global financial crisis, we have been unsuccessful to date. We did not repay our short term debt on its maturity date, October 15, 2009 resulting in an event of default and the commencement of foreclosure proceedings by GasRock Capital, the Lender. On October 28, 2009, we filed a voluntary petition for relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Code"). We continued to operate our business as a "debtor-in-possession" in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. We have submitted a plan of reorganization and, with Bankruptcy Court approval, emerge from bankruptcy and pursue our business plan. The following summarizes our goals and objectives for the next twelve months: o Minimize operating and administrative expenses to maximize return to the Company; o Increase crude oil production by repairing or rehabilitating existing wellbores that have experienced mechanical or other problems; o Successfully emerge from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy under the provisions of a Bankruptcy Court approved plan of reorganization. 23
Results of Operations Three months ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months December 31, 2009. The following is a comparative summary of our results of operations: Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 2009 ---- ---- Revenues: Oil production (in barrels) 16,242 14,484 Net oil price (per barrel) $ 74.60 $ 67.01 Oil sales $ 1,211,679 $ 970,502 Derivative gains (losses) - (6,809) ------------------------------------------------ Total revenues 1,211,679 963,693 ------------------------------------------------ Operating expenses: Production taxes 149,295 143,769 Lease operating 545,150 411,150 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 382,328 338,005 Impairment of unproved properties - 13,525,642 Exploration 6,568 3,340 General and administrative 420,848 568,717 ------------------------------------------------ Total operating expenses 1,504,189 14,990,623 ------------------------------------------------ Loss from operations (292,510) (14,026,930) ------------------------------------------------ Other income (expense): Interest expense and financing costs (735,733) (699,271) Interest and other income 5,684 7 ------------------------------------------------ Total other income (expense) (730,049) (699,264) ------------------------------------------------ Loss before reorganization items (1,022,559) (14,726,194) Reorganization items 418,804 158,727 ---------------------- ----------------------- Net loss $ (1,441,363) $ (14,884,921) =================================================== Overview. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we reported a net loss of $1,441,363, or $0.01 per basic and fully-diluted share, compared to a net loss of $14,884,921 or $0.02 per basic and fully-diluted share, for the corresponding three months of 2009. Discussions of individually significant period to period variances follow. Revenue, production taxes, and lease operating expenses. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded crude oil sales of $1,211,679 on 16,242 barrels of oil at an average price of $74.60, as compared to revenues of $963,693 on 14,484 barrels of oil at an average price of $67.01 per barrel in 2009. The year-to-year variance reflects a volume variance of $117,800 and a price variance of $123,400. The increased volume in 2010 reflects the positive results of repair and remediation work performed on non-productive wells following the bankruptcy filing and reaching agreement with our secured lender for the use of cash. Production taxes (including ad valorem and property taxes) of $149,295 in 2010 compared to $143,769 in 2009 remained constant at approximately 12.5% of crude oil sales revenues. Lease operating expenses increased to $545,150 ($33.56/bbl) in 2010 as compared to $411,150 ($28.39/bbl) in 2009. The year to year variance reflects a volume variance of $(49,900) and a cost variance of $(84,100). The per barrel increase in 2010 compared to 2009 reflects costs incurred in the aforementioned repair and remediation work to increase production. 24
Derivative losses. In connection with short term debt financing entered into in October 2007, we entered into a crude oil derivative contract with an unrelated counterparty to set a price floor of $63 per barrel for 75% of our estimated crude oil production for the next two years, and a price ceiling of $83.50 for 45% of the same level of production. A loss on derivative activities of $6,809 consisting of realized losses was recorded for the three months ended December 31, 2009. The derivative contract expired in October 2009 and was not renewed. Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of $382,328 comprised of $299,239 ($18.42/bbl) related to oil and gas properties, $39,439 related to other assets and accretion of the asset retirement obligation of $43,650. The comparable amounts for the 2009 period were $338,005 comprised of $252,368 ($17.42/bbl) related to oil and gas properties, $46,816 related to other assets and accretion of asset retirement obligation of $38,821. The year to year increase in DD&A per barrel reflects downward revisions to reserve estimates in 2010 compared to 2009. Reorganization items. The $418,804 of costs reflected as reorganization items in the three months ended December 31, 2010, include, those items of expense specifically related our reorganization following the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court on October 28, 2009. These costs consist primarily of $185,000 in reimbursable lender fees and $233,800 of professional fees to legal counsel for assistance with the filing process and the development of a reorganization plan. We expect these expenses to continue to be significant as we progress through the bankruptcy process. General and administrative expense. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected general and administrative expenses of $420,848 as compared to $568,716 for the corresponding three months ended December 31, 2009. Period to period comparisons and explanations of significant variances follow: Three Months Ended December 31, ----------------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Expense Category 2010 2009 Discussion ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Salaries, payroll taxes and Decrease in 2010 reflects reduced staff count and pay cuts for benefits $ 184,467 $242,081 remaining employees following bankruptcy filing. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Consultants 85,052 28,369 Increase in 2010 reflects costs associated with accounting, finance and land consultants to replacing employees. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Travel & entertainment 1,424 10,244 Decrease in 2010 reflects utilization of communication technology instead of travel for Board of Director meetings. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- IT 19,289 17,970 2010 costs are comparable to 2009. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Legal fees 50,259 103,822 Dramatic decrease in 2010 reflects new management's efforts to curtail legal fees. 2009 amount includes cost to investigate strategies and filing of Bankruptcy. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Audit, SOX and tax compliance 24,771 12,250 Increase in 2010 reflects quarterly financial procedures and annual tax preparation services compared to 2009 that included only quarterly financial services. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Investor relations, shareholders 3,942 6,856 Decrease in 2010 reflects reduction in shareholder correspondence meeting and mailings due to bankruptcy period. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office rent, communication & 132,518 129,084 2010 costs are comparable to 2009. other office expenses ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Insurance 24,404 32,988 Decrease in 2010 reflects lower D&O premiums reflecting reduced coverage in 2010. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Stock based compensation 21,667 84,066 Decrease in 2010 reflects completion of compensation related to vesting in stock options. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Director fees 15,000 15,000 Decrease in 2010 reflects changes to director compensation arrangements following election of new slate of directors in September 2009. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Field overhead recoveries (141,945) (114,013) Increased recoveries in 2010 reflect higher number of producing wells following repair and remediation work carried out. ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL G&A $420,848 $568,717 ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- 25
Interest expense and financing costs. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected interest expense and financing costs of $735,733 as compared to $699,271 for the corresponding three months ended December 31, 2009. The 2010 amount is comprised of interest accrued on the Note Payable issued in October 2007, as amended. The 2009 amount consists of $459,878 of interest on the Note Payable and $239,106 of deferred finance and discount amortization. The higher interest on Note Payable reflects the default interest rate (additional 2%) computed and compounded monthly since the occurrence of the event of default in October 2009. Nine months ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months December 31, 2009. The following is a comparative summary of our results of operations: Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 2009 ---- ---- Revenues: Oil production (in barrels) 50,609 41,447 Net oil price (per barrel) $ $ 69.89 $ 60.24 Oil sales $ 3,536,968 $ 2,498,376 Derivative gains (losses) - (357,582) ------------------------------------------------ Total revenues 3,536,968 2,140,794 Operating expenses: Production taxes 444,303 338,547 Lease operating 1,837,267 1,088,163 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 1,195,632 987,742 Impairment of unproved properties - 13,525,642 Exploration 25,655 15,173 General and administrative 1,656,417 2,066,226 ------------------------------------------------ Total operating expenses 5,159,274 18,021,493 ------------------------------------------------ Loss from operations (1,622,306) (15,880,699) ------------------------------------------------ Other income (expense): Interest expense and financing costs (1,682,787) (3,021,648) Interest and other income 17,250 731 ------------------------------------------------ Total other income (expense) (1,665,537) (3,020,917) ------------------------------------------------ Loss before reorganization items (3,287,843) (18,901,616) Reorganization items 1,138,340 158,727 ---------------------- ----------------------- Net loss $ (4,426,183) $ (19,060,343) =================================================== Overview. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we reported a net loss of $4,426,183 or $0.04 per basic and fully-diluted share, compared to a net loss of $19,060,343 or $0.14 per basic and fully-diluted share, for the corresponding nine months of 2009. Discussions of individually significant period to period variances follow. Revenue, production taxes, and lease operating expenses. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded crude oil sales of $3,536,968 on 50,609 barrels of oil at an average price of $69.89, as compared to revenues of $2,498,376 on 41,477 of oil at an average price of $60.24per barrel in 2009. The year-to-year variance reflects a volume variance of $550,068 and a price variance of $488,524. The increased volume in 2010 reflects the positive results 26
of repair and remediation work performed on non-productive wells following the bankruptcy filing and reaching agreement with our secured lender for the use of cash. Production taxes (including ad valorem and property taxes) of $444,303 in 2010 as compared to $338,547 in 2009 remained constant at approximately 12.6% of crude oil sales revenues. Lease operating expenses increased to $1,837,267 ($36.30/bbl) in 2010 as compared to $1,088,163 ($26.25/bbl) in 2009. The year to year variance reflects a volume variance of $(239,582) and a cost variance of $(509,522). The per barrel increase in 2010 compared to 2009 reflects costs incurred in the aforementioned repair and remediation work to increase production. Derivative losses. In connection with short term debt financing entered into in October 2007, we entered into a crude oil derivative contract with an unrelated counterparty to set a price floor of $63 per barrel for 75% of our estimated crude oil production for the next two years, and a price ceiling of $83.50 for 45% of the same level of production. A loss on derivative activities of $316,409 consisting of a realized gain of $95,113 and unrealized losses of $411,522 were recorded for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The derivative contract expired in October 2009 and was not renewed. Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected total depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion of $1,195,632 comprised of $944,112 ($18.66/bbl) related to oil and gas properties, $121,313 related to other assets and accretion of the asset retirement obligation of $130,207. The comparable amounts for the 2009 period were $987,742 comprised of $722,290 ($17.41/bbl) related to oil and gas properties, $145,973 related to other assets and accretion of asset retirement obligation of $119,480. The year to year increase in DD&A per barrel reflects downward revisions to reserve estimates in 2010 compared to 2009. Reorganization items. The $1,138,340 of costs reflected as reorganization items in the nine months ended December 31, 2010, include, those items of expense specifically related our reorganization following the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court on October 28, 2009. These costs consist primarily of $673,500 in reimbursable lender fees and $464,840 of professional fees to legal counsel for assistance with the filing process and the development of a reorganization plan. We expect these expenses to continue to be significant as we progress through the bankruptcy process. General and administrative expense. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected general and administrative expenses of $1,656,417 as compared to $2,066,226 for the corresponding nine months ended December 31, 2009. Period to period comparisons and explanations of significant variances follow: ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nine Months Ended December 31, ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Expense Category 2010 2009 Discussion ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Salaries, payroll taxes and Decrease in 2010 reflects reduced staff count and pay cuts for benefits $606,794 $ 825,239 remaining employees following bankruptcy filing. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Consultants 178,463 98,983 Increase in 2010 reflects costs associated with accounting and finance consultants to replace chief accounting officer and engineering consultants to review well files and identify production increase opportunities. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Travel & entertainment 15,400 21,525 Decrease in 2010 reflects utilization of communication technology instead of travel for Board of Diretor meeting. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT 55,638 55,619 2010 costs are comparable to 2009. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Legal fees 122,430 398,308 Decrease in 2010 reflects new management's efforts to curtail legal fees. 2009 amount includes cost to manage proxy and annual meeting process, not carried out in 2010. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit, SOX and tax compliance 70,053 96,430 Decrease in 2009 reflects lower level of activity to be reviewed by audit staff, coupled with increased efficiency in audit process in 4th year of audit, and lack of outside spending on SOX consultants in as compared to 2009. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Investor relations, shareholders 6,931 18,919 Decrease in 2010 reflects reduction in shareholder correspondence meeting and mailings due to bankruptcy period. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 27
Office rent, communication & 357,652 346,538 2010 costs are comparable to 2009. other office expenses ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Insurance 76,252 130,364 Decrease in 2010 reflects an $8,000 refund received from carrier on prior year general liability coverage, coupled with lower D&O premiums reflecting reduced coverage in 2010. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Stock based compensation 167,132 262,529 Decrease in 2010 reflects completion of compensation related to vesting in stock options. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Director fees 45,000 164,500 Decrease in 2010 reflects changes to director compensation arrangements following election of new slate of directors in September 2009. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Damages pursuant to pending claim 375,000 - Increase in 2010 reflects an expense for a pending claim settle- settlement ment of $375,000. This amount results from a dispute from a supplier that has negotiated and pending settlement by allowing the claim as a non-priority, unsecured claim in the bankcruptcy. The settlement is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court, which the Company has not yet requested. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Field overhead recoveries (420,328) (352,728) Increased recoveries in 2010 reflect a higher number of producing wells following repair and remediation work carried out. ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL G&A $1,656,417 $2,066,226 ----------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Interest expense and financing costs. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we reflected interest expense and financing costs of $1,682,787 as compared to $3,021,648 for the corresponding nine months ended December 31, 2009. The 2010 amount is comprised of interest accrued on the Notes Payable. The 2009 amount consists of $1,250,859 of interest on Notes Payable and $1,770,789 of deferred finance and discount amortization. The higher interest on Note Payable reflects the default interest rate (additional 2%) in effect since the occurrence of the event of default in October 2009. Liquidity and Capital Resources The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the uncertainty of our ability to continue as a going concern. We have incurred a cumulative net loss of $93.4 million for the period from inception (February 4, 2004) to December 31, 2010, have a working capital deficit of $12.8 million and have defaulted on our senior secured debt. On October 15, 2009, short term debt in the amount of approximately $10,188,000 matured. We were unable to repay the short term debt, which constituted an Event of Default under the terms of the Term Credit Agreement. On October 16, 2009 we received notice of the Event of Default from GasRock and notice of their intent to foreclose on the properties securing the debt. On October 21, 2009, GasRock swept the remaining $98,000 from our operating bank account, leaving us without the ability to meet operating expense obligations, or pay staff or other administrative expenses. On October 27, 2009, we raised $140,000 in cash through the issuance of convertible promissory notes to certain of our officers, directors and shareholders and used the funds to retain counsel to provide debtor advice and to provide working capital. The promissory notes matured on November 1, 2010 and bear interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 12%, or (ii) the prime rate (as published in the Wall Street Journal) plus 3%. All obligations and payments due under the promissory notes are subordinate to the Company's senior debt. Principal and accrued interest was due on the maturity date. The promissory notes are convertible, at the holder's option, into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $0.02 per share, at any time during the term of the promissory notes. The Company defaulted on these notes by failure to pay principal and accumulated interest when due. On October 28, 2009, we filed a voluntary petition for relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We reached agreement with GasRock, and the Bankruptcy Court approved an order for use of cash collateral. Under the terms 28
of the order we have been receiving the proceeds from crude oil sales and have been able to pay operating, and administrative costs in accordance with the approved cash collateral budget. This arrangement has enabled us to meet all allowable operating and administrative obligations and to build an operating cash reserve totaling $307,178 as of December 31, 2010. On January 28, 2011 the Company received debtor-in-possession financing ("DIP financing") pursuant to a credit agreement (the "DIP Credit Agreement") with a lender not related to the pre-petition credit facility provider. The DIP Credit Agreement provides for loan advances up to an aggregate of $14,700,000, and matures May 28, 2011 (120 days after closing date).. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay the allowed, secured claim for past due ad valorem property taxes, pay the allowed, secured claim of the current lender (see note 6) and fund $100,000 to be retained to the close the Bankruptcy Estate if no plan or reorganization is successful We continue to operate our business as "debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. As debtors-in-possession, the Company is authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business, and may pay all debts and honor all obligations arising in the ordinary course of its business after the Petition Date. However, the Company may not pay creditors on account of obligations arising before the Petition Date or engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without approval of the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing. On February 16, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving a motion to sell substantially all assets of the Company for $20 million. No sale closing date has been set, at the time of this filing, and the Company anticipates that such sale will occur within the next 30 to 45 days. Proceeds from the sale will be used to repay the principal and accrued interest on the DIP financing loan, bankruptcy administration costs and creditors. The following is a summary of Rancher Energy's comparative cash flows: For the Nine Months Ended December 31, ----------------------------------------- 2010 2009 --------------------- ------------------- Cash flows from (used for): $ 119,650 $(793,140) Operating activities, including reorganization items 184,757 Investing activities 6,955 - Financing activities 41,880 Positive cash flows from operating activities in 2010 reflects general and administrative as discussed above, coupled with stay on interest payments during the bankruptcy process. Funds used for investing activities in 2010 includes the cost of work performed to establish oil production in a new zone of an existing well as compared to a modest positive cash flow resulting from the sale of surplus field equipment in the period, in the 2009 period. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements nor do we have any unconsolidated subsidiaries. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Critical accounting policies and estimates are provided in Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010. Additional footnote disclosures are provided in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Financial Information, Item 1, Financial Statements to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010. 29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. Commodity Price Risk Because of our relatively low level of current oil and gas production, we are not exposed to a great degree of market risk relating to the pricing applicable to our oil production. However, our ability to raise additional capital at attractive pricing, our future revenues from oil and gas operations, our future profitability and future rate of growth depend substantially upon the market prices of oil and natural gas, which fluctuate widely. With increases to our production, exposure to this risk will become more significant. We expect commodity price volatility to continue. Financial Market Risk The debt and equity markets have recently exhibited adverse conditions. The unprecedented volatility and upheaval in the capital markets impacted our ability to refinance or extend our existing short term debt when it matured on October 15, 2009. Alternatively, market conditions may affect the availability of capital for prospective purchasers of our assets or equity. Item 4. Controls and Procedures. Disclosure Controls and Procedures We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its principal executive officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The conclusion by our Chief Executive Office is the identification of the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and, as a result of this material weakness, we concluded as of March 31, 2010 and as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. We did not adequately segregate the duties of different personnel within our Accounting Department due to an insufficient complement of staff and inadequate management oversight. We have limited accounting personnel with sufficient expertise in generally accepted accounting principles to enable effective segregation of duties with respect to recording journal entries and to allow for appropriate monitoring of financial reporting matters and internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, the Chief Accounting Officer resigned during the current fiscal year resulting in the creation and review of journal entries and note disclosures without adequate independent review and authorization. This control deficiency is pervasive in nature and impacts all significant accounts. This control deficiency also affects the financial reporting process including financial statement preparation and the related note disclosures. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION. Item 1. Legal Proceedings On October 28, 2009, the Company filed a voluntary petition (the "petition") for relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court (the "Court"), District of Colorado under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). The Bankruptcy proceedings are discussed in further detail in Part 1 of this filing. On February 12, 2010, the Company filed an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court against GasRock Capital LLC, Case No. 10-01173-MER. The complaint seeks to recover the 10% NPI conveyed to GasRock in connection with the Eighth Amendment to the Term Credit Agreement and the additional 1% ORRI conveyed to the Lender in October 2008 in connection with an extension of the short term note. The primary basis of the complaint is that the Lender gave less than fair equivalent value for the conveyances at a time when the Company was insolvent, or when the conveyances left the Company with insufficient capital. In other words, the Company has claimed that the value of the conveyances was in excess of a reasonable fee for the extensions, and, as a result, the conveyances were "constructively fraudulent" under both applicable Bankruptcy law and the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act. In addition, the Company has challenged the conveyance of the NPI and the 1% ORRI, together with the original 2% ORRI conveyed to Lender when its loan was first made, on the grounds that they should be recharacterized as security interests and not outright transfers of title. The Company has also claimed that the conveyances rendered the Loan usurious under Texas law. Further, the Company has sought to have the NPI and 1% ORRI avoided as preferences under Sections 547 of the Bankruptcy Code and to equitably subordinate the Lender's claim. Although the Company believes its claims are well-taken, the Company expects the Lender to vigorously defend against the complaint, and no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in whole or in part. On October 21, 2010, the Court issued an order dismissing three of nine claims made in the adversary action regarding recharacterization. The Company plans to pursue the remaining claims and may move to have the Bankruptcy Court reconsider the dismissal of the recharacterization claims. See also Note 8 - Contingencies, of Part 1 - Financial Information, of this quarterly filing for a description of threatened litigation Item 1A. Risk Factors Not applicable to smaller reporting companies. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES NONE. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES NONE. ITEM 4. RESERVED AND RESCINDED. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION NONE. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS Exhibits. The following is a complete list of exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q. Exhibit numbers correspond to the numbers in the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 31
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 32
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. RANCHER ENERGY CORP., Registrant Dated: February 18, 2011 By: /s/ Jon C. Nicolaysen ----------------------------------- Jon C. Nicolaysen, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Accounting Officer 33