Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. | c07166exv10w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. | c07166exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. | c07166exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. | c07166exv32w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33347
Aruba Networks, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
02-0579097 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1344 Crossman Ave.
Sunnyvale, California 94089-1113
(408) 227-4500
Sunnyvale, California 94089-1113
(408) 227-4500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.0001, outstanding as of
November 30, 2010 was 98,330,472
ARUBA NETWORKS INC.
INDEX
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements |
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 54,384 | $ | 31,254 | ||||
Short-term investments |
120,071 | 124,167 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
42,980 | 41,269 | ||||||
Inventory |
18,072 | 15,159 | ||||||
Deferred costs |
4,672 | 5,451 | ||||||
Prepaids and other |
3,742 | 5,108 | ||||||
Total current assets |
243,921 | 222,408 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
10,617 | 9,919 | ||||||
Goodwill |
32,498 | 7,656 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
24,610 | 9,287 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,673 | 1,437 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 313,319 | $ | 250,707 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,647 | $ | 8,082 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
49,048 | 36,458 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
575 | 519 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, current |
43,247 | 43,422 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
97,517 | 88,481 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, long-term |
13,730 | 10,976 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
596 | 595 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
111,843 | 100,052 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock: $0.0001 par value; 350,000 shares authorized at
October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively; 97,592 and 93,606 shares issued
shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively |
10 | 9 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
374,787 | 326,178 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
174 | 98 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(173,495 | ) | (175,630 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
201,476 | 150,655 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 313,319 | $ | 250,707 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Product |
$ | 69,204 | $ | 47,198 | ||||
Professional services and support |
13,800 | 10,143 | ||||||
Ratable product and related
professional services and support |
143 | 255 | ||||||
Total revenues |
83,147 | 57,596 | ||||||
Cost of revenues |
||||||||
Product |
22,063 | 16,432 | ||||||
Professional services and support |
2,905 | 2,079 | ||||||
Ratable product and related
professional services and support |
10 | 86 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues |
24,978 | 18,597 | ||||||
Gross profit |
58,169 | 38,999 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||
Research and development |
17,113 | 11,796 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
33,415 | 24,740 | ||||||
General and administrative |
7,188 | 7,132 | ||||||
Litigation reserves |
| 19,750 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
57,716 | 63,418 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
453 | (24,419 | ) | |||||
Other income (expense), net |
||||||||
Interest income |
233 | 211 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net |
1,645 | (96 | ) | |||||
Total other income (expense), net |
1,878 | 115 | ||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
2,331 | (24,304 | ) | |||||
Provision for income taxes |
196 | 372 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 2,135 | $ | (24,676 | ) | |||
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per
common share |
96,037 | 87,489 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share, basic |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.28 | ) | |||
Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per
common share |
113,271 | 87,489 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share, diluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.28 | ) | |||
Stock-based compensation expense included in above: |
||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ | 475 | $ | 318 | ||||
Research and development |
3,901 | 2,131 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
5,102 | 3,021 | ||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 2,090 | $ | 2,349 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 2,135 | $ | (24,676 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,299 | 2,494 | ||||||
Provision for (benefit from) doubtful accounts |
(8 | ) | 21 | |||||
Write downs for excess and obsolete inventory |
661 | 446 | ||||||
Compensation related to stock options and share awards |
11,568 | 7,819 | ||||||
Accretion of purchase discounts on short-term investments |
334 | 81 | ||||||
Loss/ (gain) on disposal of fixed assets |
(8 | ) | 8 | |||||
Change in carrying value of contingent rights liability |
(1,777 | ) | | |||||
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation |
(55 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
822 | 467 | ||||||
Inventory |
(1,996 | ) | (1,469 | ) | ||||
Prepaids and other |
(304 | ) | (850 | ) | ||||
Deferred costs |
780 | (1,816 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
(85 | ) | 36 | |||||
Accounts payable |
(5,190 | ) | 1,346 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
1,239 | 6,339 | ||||||
Other current and noncurrent liabilities |
4,701 | 20,107 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
(82 | ) | 179 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
16,034 | 10,486 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(28,159 | ) | (15,730 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments |
7,376 | | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments |
24,480 | 5,820 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(2,861 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
14 | | ||||||
Cash paid in purchase acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(1,258 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(408 | ) | (10,407 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
7,447 | 2,631 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation |
55 | 46 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
7,502 | 2,677 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
23,130 | 2,758 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
31,254 | 41,298 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 54,384 | $ | 44,056 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 409 | $ | 281 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Common stock issued for purchase acquisition |
$ | 28,691 | $ | | ||||
Contingent rights issued for purchase acquisition |
9,486 | | ||||||
Advance on
purchase price of acquisition |
$ | 2,000 | $ | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies
The Company
Aruba Networks, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 11,
2002. The Company securely connects local and remote users to corporate IT resources via
distributed enterprise networks. The Companys portfolio of campus, branch office, teleworker, and
mobile solutions simplifies operations and provides secure access to all corporate applications and
services regardless of a users device, location, or network. The products the Company licenses
and sells include high-speed 802.11n wireless local area networks, Virtual Branching Networking
solutions for branch offices and teleworkers, and network operations tools, including spectrum
analyzers, wireless intrusion prevention systems, and the AirWave Wireless Management Suite for
managing wired, wireless, and mobile device networks. The Company has offices in North America,
Europe, the Middle East and the Asia Pacific region and employs staff around the world.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The
accompanying statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed on September 24, 2010. The July 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet data were
derived from audited financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.).
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). They do not include all of the financial
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The Company believes
the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as its audited
financial statements as of and for the year ended July 31, 2010 and include all adjustments
necessary for the fair statement of the Companys financial position as of October 31, 2010, its
results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, and its cash flows for
the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009. The results for the three months ended October
31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or
for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2011.
Other than the adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-14, Software
(Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, and ASU 2009-13, Revenue
Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, there have been no significant
changes in the Companys accounting policies during the three months ended October 31, 2010, as
compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010.
Revenue Recognition
In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove
tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together
to deliver the products essential functionality from the scope of industry-specific software
revenue recognition guidance. In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting standards for
multiple-element revenue arrangements to:
(i) | provide updated guidance on how the elements in a multiple-element arrangement should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated; | ||
(ii) | require an entity to allocate revenue amongst the elements in an arrangement using estimated selling prices (ESP) if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the selling price or third-party evidence (TPE) of the selling price; and | ||
(iii) | eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. |
The Company adopted this accounting guidance at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal
2011 on a prospective basis for applicable arrangements originating or materially modified after
August 1, 2010. The impact of this adoption was not material to the Companys financial position
and results of operations in the three months ended October 31, 2010.
6
Table of Contents
This guidance does not generally change the units of accounting for the Companys revenue
transactions. Most non-software products and services qualify as separate units of accounting
because they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and the Companys revenue
arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to delivered products.
The majority of the Companys products are hardware appliances containing software components
that function together to provide the essential functionality of the product. Therefore, the
Companys hardware appliances are considered non-software elements and have been removed from the
industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
The Companys product revenue also includes revenue from the sale of stand-alone software
products. Stand-alone software products may operate on the Companys hardware appliance, but are
not considered essential to the functionality of the hardware. Sales of stand-alone software
generally include a perpetual license to the Companys software. Sales of stand-alone software
continue to be subject to the industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
For all arrangements originating or materially modified after July 31, 2010, the Company
recognizes revenue in accordance with the amended accounting guidance. Certain arrangements with
multiple-elements may continue to have stand-alone software elements that are subject to the
existing software revenue recognition guidance along with non-software elements that are subject to
the amended revenue accounting guidance. The revenue for these multiple deliverable arrangements is
allocated to the stand-alone software elements as a group and the non-software elements based on
the relative selling prices of all of the elements in the arrangement using the fair value
hierarchy in the amended revenue accounting guidance.
For sales of stand-alone software after July 31, 2010 and for all transactions entered into
prior to the first quarter of 2011, the Company recognizes revenue based on software revenue
recognition guidance. Under the software revenue recognition guidance, the Company uses the
residual method to recognize revenue when a product agreement includes one or more elements to be
delivered at a future date and VSOE of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. In the
majority of the Companys contracts, the only element that remains undelivered at the time of
delivery of the product is support services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the
undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the contract fee is recognized as
product revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist,
all revenue is generally deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when
fair value can be established. When the undelivered element for which the Company does not have
VSOE of fair value is support, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably
over the support period.
VSOE for elements of an arrangement is based upon the normal pricing and discounting practices
for those services when sold separately, and VSOE for support services is measured by the
stand-alone renewal rate offered to the customer. In determining VSOE, the Company requires that a
substantial majority of the selling prices for an element falls within a reasonably narrow pricing
range, generally evidenced by a substantial majority of such historical stand-alone transactions
falling within a reasonably narrow range of the median rates. In addition, the Company considers
major service groups, geographies, customer classifications, and other variables in determining
VSOE.
The Company is typically not able to determine TPE for the Companys products or services. TPE
is determined based on competitor prices for similar elements when sold separately. Generally, the
Companys go-to-market strategy differs from that of the Companys peers and the Companys
offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of
products with similar functionality cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the Company is unable to
reliably determine what similar competitor products selling prices are on a stand-alone basis.
When the Company is unable to establish selling price of its non-software elements using VSOE
or TPE, the Company uses ESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP
is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were
sold on a stand-alone basis. The Company determines ESP for a product or service by considering
multiple factors including, but not limited to, cost of products, gross margin objectives, pricing
practices, geographies, customer classes and distribution channels.
The Company regularly reviews VSOE and ESP and maintains internal controls over the
establishment and updates of these estimates. There was not a material impact during the quarter
nor does the Company currently expect a material impact in the near term from changes in VSOE or
ESP.
Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of the Companys hardware appliances and
perpetual software licenses. The Company recognizes product revenue when all of the following have
occurred: (1) the Company has entered into a legally binding arrangement with a customer;
(2) delivery has occurred; (3) customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of
contingencies and significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is reasonably assured.
7
Table of Contents
For sales to direct end-users and channel partners, including value-added resellers,
value-added distributors, and OEMs, the Company recognizes product revenue upon delivery, assuming
all other revenue recognition criteria are met. For the Companys hardware appliances, delivery
occurs upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. It is the
Companys practice to identify an end-user prior to shipment to a channel partner. For end-users
and channel partners, the Company generally has no significant obligations for future performance
such as rights of return or pricing credits. A portion of the Companys sales are made through
distributors under agreements allowing for stocking of the Companys products in their inventory,
pricing credits and limited rights of return for stock rotation. Product revenue on sales made
through these distributors is initially deferred and revenue is recognized upon sell-through as
reported by the
distributors to the Company. Shipping charges billed to customers are included in product
revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of product revenue.
Support and services consist of support agreements, professional services, and training.
Support services include repair and replacement of defective hardware appliances, software updates
and access to technical support personnel. Software updates provide customers with rights to
unspecified software product upgrades and to maintenance releases and patches released during the
term of the support period. Revenue for support services is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the service contract term, which is typically one to three years. Professional services are
recognized upon delivery or completion of performance. Professional service arrangements are
typically short term in nature and are largely completed within 90 days from the start of service.
Training services are recognized upon delivery of the training.
The Companys fees are typically considered to be fixed or determinable at the inception of an
arrangement, generally based on specific products and quantities to be delivered. Substantially all
of the Companys contracts do not include rights of return or acceptance provisions. To the extent
that the Companys agreements contain such terms, the Company recognizes revenue once the customer
has accepted, or once the acceptance provisions or right of return lapses. Payment terms to
customers generally range from net 30 to 60 days. In the event payment terms are provided that
differ from the Companys standard business practices, the fees are deemed to not be fixed or
determinable and revenue is recognized when the payments become due, provided the remaining
criteria for revenue recognition have been met.
The Company assesses the ability to collect from its customers based on a number of factors,
including credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history of the customer. If the
customer is not deemed credit worthy, the Company defers revenue from the arrangement until payment
is received and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
2. Acquisition
On September 2, 2010, the Company completed its acquisition of Azalea Networks (Azalea) for
a total purchase price of $42.0 million. Azalea is a leading supplier of outdoor mesh networks and
includes an operations center in Beijing, China which will complement the Companys existing
research and development centers. The results of Azaleas operations have been included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements since the acquisition date.
The Company accounted for this acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business
Combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were
recorded at fair value on the acquisition date.
The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands):
Stock (1,524,517 shares at $18.82) |
$ | 28,691 | ||
Cash |
1,808 | |||
Contingent rights |
9,486 | |||
Advance on
purchase price |
2,000 | |||
Total consideration |
$ | 41,985 | ||
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
managements estimates of their fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase
consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. Goodwill
is not being amortized but reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment
indicators arise. In part, goodwill reflected the competitive advantages the Company expected to
realize from Azaleas standing in the China service provider industry.
8
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the estimated purchase price allocation (in thousands,
except estimated useful lives). Estimates of liabilities are subject to change, pending the
Companys final review of Azaleas obligations.
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 550 | ||||||
Accounts Receivable |
2,525 | |||||||
Inventory |
1,794 | |||||||
Prepaids and other assets |
331 | |||||||
PP&E |
265 | |||||||
Total tangible assets acquired |
5,465 |
Estimated | ||||||||
Useful Lives | ||||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: |
||||||||
Existing Technology |
11,800 | 5 years | ||||||
Patents/Core Technology |
2,300 | 6 years | ||||||
Customer Contracts |
1,800 | 6 years | ||||||
Tradenames/Trademarks |
100 | 1 year | ||||||
Non-Compete Agreements |
100 | 2 years | ||||||
In-process research and development |
900 | |||||||
Goodwill |
24,842 | |||||||
Total assets acquired |
47,307 | |||||||
Liabilities |
(5,322 | ) | ||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
(5,322 | ) | ||||||
Total |
$ | 41,985 | ||||||
The purchased intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of 5.2 years from the date
of the acquisition.
A portion of the purchase price was allocated to developed product technology and in-process
research and development (IPR&D). They were identified and valued through an analysis of data
provided by Azalea concerning developmental products, their stage of development, the time and
resources needed to complete them, target markets, their expected income generating ability and
associated risks. The Income Approach, which is based on the premise that the value of an asset is
the present value of its future earning capacity, was the primary valuation technique employed. A
discount rate of 16% was applied to developed product technology and IPR&D. The Company recognizes
IPR&D at fair value as of the acquisition date, and subsequently accounts for it as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset until completion or abandonment of the associated research and
development efforts. IPR&D is tested for impairment during the period it is considered an
indefinite lived asset.
Developed product technology, which includes products that are already technologically
feasible, is primarily comprised of a portfolio of outdoor mesh routers. Developmental projects
that had not reached technological feasibility are recognized as identifiable intangible assets.
The principal project at the acquisition date relates to developing multi-radio outdoor mesh
routers for the core network for even the largest enterprises. This technology would enable faster
internet access for higher throughput performance, covering greater distances for both mesh and
video networks. The Company expects to incur post-acquisition costs of approximately $0.3 million
during fiscal 2011. The Company expects to complete all work by the end of the second quarter of
fiscal 2011.
The Company expensed $0.7 million of acquisition-related costs incurred as general and
administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period the expense was
incurred.
Based on its evaluation of the materiality of Azaleas stand-alone financial statements to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Aruba Networks taken as a whole, the Company determined that
the acquisition does not meet the requirements needed to disclose pro forma financial statements
for the acquisition.
Contingent Rights Liability
Contingent rights were issued to each Azalea shareholder as part of the purchase
consideration. For each share received, the Azalea shareholder also received a right to receive an
amount of cash equal to the shortfall generated if a share is sold below the target value within
the payment period, as specified in the arrangement. For shares not held in escrow, the payment
period begins August 1, 2011 and ends on December 31, 2011. For shares held in escrow the payment
period begins April 2, 2012 and ends on May 1, 2012. The rights are subject to forfeiture in
certain circumstances.
9
Table of Contents
At the acquisition date, the Company recorded a liability for the estimated fair value of
the contingent rights of $9.5 million. This liability was estimated using a lattice model and was
based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represented a Level 3 instrument.
Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and reflect the Companys own assumptions in measuring fair value. The inputs
included:
| stock price as of the valuation date; |
| strike price of the contingent right; | ||
| maximum payoff per share; |
| number of shares held in and outside of escrow; |
| exercise period; |
| historical volatility of the Companys stock price based on weekly stock price returns; and |
| risk-free rate interpolated from the Constant Maturity Treasury Rate. |
The change in fair value from the acquisition date to October 31, 2010 was primarily driven by
an increase in the Companys stock price. Gains and losses on the remeasurement of the contingent
rights liability are included in other income (expense), net. As the fair value of the contingent
rights liability will largely be determined based on the Companys closing stock price as of future
fiscal periods, it is not possible to determine a probable range of possible outcomes of the
valuation of the contingent rights liability. However, the maximum contingent rights liability
will be no more than $13.5 million as defined in the acquisition agreement.
The following table represents the change in the contingent rights liability:
Amount | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
$ | | ||
Acquisition date fair value measurement |
9,486 | |||
Adjustments to fair value |
(1,777 | ) | ||
Balance as of October 31, 2010 |
$ | 7,709 | ||
3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents details of the Companys goodwill: |
Amount | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
$ | 7,656 | ||
Goodwill acquired in acquisition |
24,842 | |||
As of October 31, 2010 |
$ | 32,498 | ||
The following table presents details of the Companys total purchased intangible assets:
Estimated | Gross | Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||||
Useful Lives | Value | Amortization | Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Existing Technology |
4 to 5 years | $ | 21,083 | $ | (6,887 | ) | $ | 14,196 | ||||||||
In-process research
and development |
NA | 900 | | 900 | ||||||||||||
Patents/Core Technology |
4 to 6 years | 5,346 | (2,194 | ) | 3,152 | |||||||||||
Customer Contracts |
6 to 7 years | 6,883 | (2,279 | ) | 4,604 | |||||||||||
Support Agreements |
5 to 6 years | 2,717 | (1,420 | ) | 1,297 | |||||||||||
Tradenames/Trademarks |
1 to 5 years | 700 | (330 | ) | 370 | |||||||||||
Non-Compete Agreements |
2 years | 812 | (721 | ) | 91 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 38,441 | $ | (13,831 | ) | $ | 24,610 | |||||||||
10
Table of Contents
Estimated | Gross | Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||
Useful Lives | Value | Amortization | Value | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||
Existing Technology |
4 years | $ | 9,283 | $ | (5,914 | ) | $ | 3,369 | ||||||
Patents/Core Technology |
4 years | 3,046 | (1,940 | ) | 1,106 | |||||||||
Customer Contracts |
6 to 7 years | 5,083 | (2,020 | ) | 3,063 | |||||||||
Support Agreements |
5 to 6 years | 2,717 | (1,284 | ) | 1,433 | |||||||||
Tradenames/Trademarks |
5 years | 600 | (284 | ) | 316 | |||||||||
Non-Compete Agreements |
2 years | 712 | (712 | ) | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,441 | $ | (12,154 | ) | $ | 9,287 | |||||||
The Company recorded approximately $1.7 million and $1.2 million of amortization expense
related to its purchased intangible assets during each of the three months ended October 31, 2010
and 2009. Amortization expense is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations under the
following:
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cost of product revenues |
$ | 1,228 | $ | 771 | ||||
Cost of professional services and support revenues |
77 | 135 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
372 | 327 | ||||||
Total amortiztaion expense |
$ | 1,677 | $ | 1,233 | ||||
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of October 31,
2010 is as follows:
Amount | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Remaining nine months of fiscal 2011 |
$ | 5,805 | ||
Years ending July 31, |
||||
2012 |
6,023 | |||
2013 |
4,303 | |||
2014 |
3,599 | |||
2015 |
3,043 | |||
Thereafter |
937 | |||
Total |
$ | 23,710 | ||
11
Table of Contents
4. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss)
per common share is calculated by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares,
including stock options and awards, unless the result is anti-dilutive. The following tables set
forth the computation of net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended | ||||
October 31, 2010 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 2,135 | ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding- basic |
96,037 | |||
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans |
17,234 | |||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding- diluted |
$ | 113,271 | ||
Net income per share, basic |
$ | 0.02 | ||
Net income per share, diluted |
$ | 0.02 | ||
Three months ended | ||||
October 31, 2009 | ||||
Net loss |
$ | (24,676 | ) | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding net of
weighted-average common shares subject to repurchase |
87,489 | |||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
$ | (0.28 | ) | |
The following outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards were excluded from the
computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended October 31, 2009
because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
Three months ended | ||||
October 31, 2009 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Options to purchase common stock |
22,391 | |||
Restricted stock awards |
2,784 | |||
Common stock subject to repurchase |
111 |
5. Short-term Investments
Short-term investments consist of the following:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Basis | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes |
$ | 23,722 | $ | 103 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 23,822 | |||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
71,050 | 109 | (6 | ) | 71,153 | |||||||||||
U.S. treasury bills |
18,327 | 64 | | 18,391 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
4,440 | 5 | | 4,445 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
2,255 | 5 | | 2,260 | ||||||||||||
Total
short-term investments |
$ | 119,794 | $ | 286 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 120,071 | |||||||
12
Table of Contents
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Basis | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes |
$ | 23,802 | $ | 69 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 23,867 | |||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
80,683 | 78 | (9 | ) | 80,752 | |||||||||||
U.S. treasury bills |
12,816 | 57 | | 12,873 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
4,495 | | | 4,495 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
2,179 | 1 | | 2,180 | ||||||||||||
Total short-term investments |
$ | 123,975 | $ | 205 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 124,167 | |||||||
The cost basis and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity, are presented below:
Cost | Fair | |||||||
Basis | Value | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
||||||||
One year or less |
$ | 85,184 | $ | 85,353 | ||||
One to two years |
34,610 | 34,718 | ||||||
Total short-term investments |
$ | 119,794 | $ | 120,071 | ||||
The Company reviews the individual securities in its portfolio to determine whether a decline
in a securitys fair value below the amortized cost basis is other than temporary. The Company
determined that there were no investments in its portfolio, related to credit losses or otherwise,
that were other-than temporarily impaired during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 or 2010.
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the Companys
investments with unrealized losses aggregated by type of investment instrument and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 Months | ||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | |||||||
Value | Loss | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes |
$ | 2,178 | $ | (3 | ) | |||
U.S. government agency securities |
2,519 | (6 | ) | |||||
$ | 4,697 | $ | (9 | ) | ||||
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of bank deposits with third-party financial
institutions and highly liquid money market securities with original maturities at date of purchase
of 90 days or less and are stated at cost which approximates fair value.
Short-term investments are recorded at fair value, defined as the exit price in the
principal market in which the Company would transact representing the amount that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. Level 1 instruments are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets for
identical instruments and include the Companys investments in money market funds. Level 2
securities are valued using quoted market prices for similar instruments, nonbinding market prices
that are corroborated by observable market data, or discounted cash flow techniques and include the
Companys investments in corporate bonds and notes, U.S. government agency securities, treasury
bills, and commercial paper. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Companys own assumptions in measuring
fair value. The Company has no short-term investments classified as level 3 instruments.
13
Table of Contents
As of October 31, 2010, the fair value measurements of the Companys cash, cash equivalents
and short-term investments consisted of the following:
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes |
$ | 23,823 | $ | | $ | 23,823 | ||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
71,153 | | 71,153 | |||||||||
U.S. treasury bills |
18,391 | | 18,391 | |||||||||
Commercial paper |
4,444 | | 4,444 | |||||||||
Money market funds |
17,276 | 17,276 | | |||||||||
Total cash equivalents and short-term investments |
135,087 | $ | 17,276 | $ | 117,811 | |||||||
Certificates of deposit |
2,260 | |||||||||||
Cash deposits with third-party financial institutions |
37,108 | |||||||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments |
$ | 174,455 | ||||||||||
6. Balance Sheet Components
The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet items:
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Accounts Receivable, net |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
$ | 43,295 | $ | 41,731 | ||||
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(315 | ) | (462 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 42,980 | $ | 41,269 | ||||
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Inventory |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 191 | $ | 294 | ||||
Finished goods |
17,881 | 14,865 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 18,072 | $ | 15,159 | ||||
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Accrued Liabilities |
||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
$ | 10,451 | $ | 11,363 | ||||
Inventory |
12,223 | 9,381 | ||||||
Marketing |
7,183 | 7,176 | ||||||
Contingent rights |
7,709 | | ||||||
Other |
11,482 | 8,538 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 49,048 | $ | 36,458 | ||||
14
Table of Contents
7. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net consists of the following:
Estimated | October 31, | July 31, | ||||||||||
Useful Lives | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Computer equipment |
2 years | $ | 9,431 | $ | 7,993 | |||||||
Computer software |
2-5 years | 4,654 | 4,558 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
2 years | 10,947 | 10,441 | |||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
5 years | 2,471 | 2,397 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
2-6 years | 2,316 | 2,174 | |||||||||
Total property and equipment, gross |
29,819 | 27,563 | ||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(19,202 | ) | (17,644 | ) | ||||||||
Total property and equipment, net |
$ | 10,617 | $ | 9,919 | ||||||||
8. Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue consists of the following:
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Product |
$ | 13,191 | $ | 16,087 | ||||
Professional services and support |
29,469 | 27,298 | ||||||
Ratable product and related services and support |
587 | 37 | ||||||
Total deferred revenue, current |
43,247 | 43,422 | ||||||
Professional services and support, long-term |
13,083 | 10,976 | ||||||
Ratable product and related services and support, long-term |
647 | | ||||||
Total deferred revenue, long-term |
13,730 | 10,976 | ||||||
Total deferred revenue |
$ | 56,977 | $ | 54,398 | ||||
Deferred product revenue relates to arrangements where not all revenue recognition criteria
have been met. Deferred professional services and support revenue primarily represents customer
payments made in advance for support contracts. Support contracts are typically billed on an annual
basis in advance and revenue is recognized ratably over the support period, typically one to five
years.
Deferred ratable product and related services and support revenue consists of revenue on
transactions where VSOE of fair value of support has not been established and the entire
arrangement is being recognized ratably over the support period, which typically ranges from one
year to three years. The increase in ratable product and related services and support is due to
the acquisition of Azalea Networks.
9. Income Taxes
For the three months ended October 31, 2010, the Company generated operating income. The
Company also generated consolidated book and taxable income in U.S. and foreign jurisdictions for
the three months ended October 31, 2010. For the three months ended October 31, 2009, the Company
generated consolidated book losses but generated taxable income in most U.S. and foreign
jurisdictions.
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Based on the available objective evidence, including
the fact that the Company has historically generated losses, management believes it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, management has applied a
full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets generated primarily in the U.S.
The Company files annual income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S.
state and local jurisdictions, and in various foreign jurisdictions. The Company remains subject to
tax authority review for all jurisdictions for all years.
15
Table of Contents
10. Equity Incentive Plans
Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes the information about shares available for grant and
outstanding stock option activity:
Options Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise | Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available for | Number of | Price | Fair Value | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||||||
Grant | Shares | per Share | per Share | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
635,877 | 23,640,524 | $ | 5.00 | 5.9 | $ | 283,285,534 | |||||||||||||||||
Shares reserved for issuance |
4,680,314 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards granted |
(1,081,325 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards cancelled |
79,899 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options granted |
(973,760 | ) | 973,760 | 20.51 | $ | 10.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised |
| (1,210,963 | ) | 3.68 | 19,326,834 | |||||||||||||||||||
Options cancelled |
151,651 | (151,651 | ) | 7.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
3,492,656 | 23,251,670 | $ | 5.70 | 5.7 | $ | 377,342,306 | |||||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price
of the underlying stock option awards and the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date
of each option exercise. Stock-based compensation expense recognized for stock
options was $4.4 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Restricted Stock Award Activity
The following table summarizes the non-vested restricted stock awards activity:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | per Share | |||||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
2,215,932 | $ | 9.74 | |||||
Awards granted |
1,081,325 | 20.38 | ||||||
Awards vested |
(259,782 | ) | 12.03 | |||||
Awards cancelled |
(79,899 | ) | 12.20 | |||||
As of October 31, 2010 |
2,957,576 | $ | 13.37 | |||||
The estimated fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the market price of the
Companys stock on the grant date. Stock-based compensation expense recognized for restricted stock
awards for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $5.6 million and $3.8 million,
respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Activity
During the three months ended October 31, 2010, 990,512 shares were purchased at an average
per share price of $3.02. Compensation expense recognized in connection with the ESPP for the three
months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $1.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
During the three months ended October 31, 2010, the Company modified the terms of certain
existing awards under its ESPP as a result of employees who previously participated in ESPP and
subsequently elected to increase their contribution. Consequently, the Company will recognize $1.2 million in incremental stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period. The Company
recognized $0.3 million in incremental stock-based compensation expense arising from the award
modification for the three months ended October 31, 2010.
Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
model with the following weighted average assumptions:
16
Table of Contents
Employee Stock Options
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.7 | % | 1.9 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
4 | 4.3 | ||||||
Dividend yield |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Volatility |
70 | % | 70 | % |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.2% to 1.0% | 0.2% to 1.0% | ||||||
Expected term (in years) |
0.5 to 2.0 | 0.5 to 2.0 | ||||||
Dividend yield |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Volatility |
41% to 101% | 63% to 81% |
The expected term of the stock-based awards represents the period of time that the Company
expects such stock-based awards to be
outstanding, giving consideration to the contractual term of the awards, vesting schedules and
expectations of future employee behavior. The Company gave consideration to its historical
exercises, the vesting term of its stock options, the post vesting cancellation history of its
stock options and the stock options contractual terms. The contractual term of stock options
granted from inception of the Company through August 16, 2007 was generally 10 years. On August 17,
2007, the Companys Compensation Committee revised the 2007 Plan to provide for a contractual term
of seven years on all option grants on or after such date. Given the Companys limited operating
history, the Company then compared this estimated term to those of comparable companies from a
representative peer group, the selection of which was based on industry data to determine the
expected term. Similarly, the Company computes expected volatility based on its historical
volatility and the historical volatility of these comparable companies. The Company made an
estimate of expected forfeitures, and is recognizing stock-based compensation only for those equity
awards that it expects to vest. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is
based on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate as of the date of grant.
Stock-based Expenses
Total stock-based compensation for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $11.6
million and $7.8 million, respectively. The Company did not capitalize stock-based compensation
during the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, due to the amount qualifying for
capitalization being immaterial.
11. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the following:
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 2,135 | $ | (24,676 | ) | |||
Change in unrealized gain on
short term investments, net of taxes |
76 | 28 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 2,211 | $ | (24,648 | ) | |||
12. Segment Information and Significant Customers
The Company operates in one industry segment selling fixed and modular mobility controllers,
wired and wireless access points, and related software and services.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or
decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
Companys chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Companys Chief
Executive Officer reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of
allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The Company has one business activity,
and there are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, operating results and
plans for products or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, the Company
reports as a single operating segment. The Company and its Chief Executive Officer evaluate
performance based primarily on revenue in the geographic locations in which the Company operates.
Revenue is attributed by geographic location based on the ship-to location of the Companys
customers. The Companys assets are primarily located in the U.S. and not allocated to any specific
region. Therefore, geographic information is presented only for total revenue.
17
Table of Contents
The following presents total revenue by geographic region:
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
United States |
$ | 51,752 | $ | 33,616 | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
13,153 | 7,632 | ||||||
Asia Pacific |
14,507 | 12,506 | ||||||
Rest of World |
3,735 | 3,842 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 83,147 | $ | 57,596 | ||||
The following table presents significant channel partners as a percentage of total revenues (*
represents less than 10%):
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Partner A |
20.3 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||
Partner B |
14.4 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||
Partner C |
11.2 | % | 10.6 | % | ||||
Partner D |
* | 11.2 | % |
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
The Company could become involved in litigation from time to time relating to claims arising
out of its ordinary course of business. There were no claims as of October 31, 2010 that, in the
opinion of management, might have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Lease Obligation
The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration
dates through July 2016. The terms of certain operating leases provide for rental payments on a
graduated scale. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the respective
lease periods and has accrued for rent expense incurred but not paid.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
Operating | ||||
Leases | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Nine months remaining in fiscal 2011 |
$ | 2,008 | ||
Year ending July 31, |
||||
2012 |
2,701 | |||
2013 |
2,775 | |||
2014 |
2,820 | |||
2015 |
2,809 | |||
2016 |
2,442 | |||
Total minimum payments |
$ | 15,555 | ||
18
Table of Contents
Non-cancelable purchase commitments
The Company outsources the production of its hardware to third-party contract manufacturers.
In addition, the Company enters into various inventory related purchase commitments with its
contract manufacturers and other suppliers. The Company had $20.7 million and $20.3 million in
non-cancelable purchase commitments with these providers as of October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010,
respectively. The Company expects to sell all products that it has committed to purchase from these
providers.
Warranties
The Company provides for future warranty costs upon product delivery. The specific terms and
conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which the
Company does business. In the case of hardware, the warranties are generally for 12-15 months from
the date of purchase. The Company also has a lifetime warranty program on certain access points
purchased subsequent to the announcement of the program.
The Company warrants that any media on which its software products are recorded will be free
from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of 90 days from the date
the products are delivered to the end customer. In addition, the Company warrants that its hardware
products will substantially conform to the Companys published specifications. Historically, the
Company has experienced minimal warranty costs. Factors that affect the Companys warranty
liability include the number of installed units, historical experience and managements judgment
regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. The Company assesses the
adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities every period and makes adjustments to the liability
as necessary.
The warranty liability is included as a component of accrued liabilities on the balance sheet.
Changes in the warranty liability are as follows:
Warranty | ||||
Amount | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
As of July 31, 2010 |
$ | 210 | ||
Provision |
63 | |||
Obligations fulfilled during period |
(53 | ) | ||
As of October 31, 2010 |
$ | 220 | ||
Indemnifications
In its sales agreements, the Company may agree to indemnify its indirect sales channels and
end user customers for any expenses or liability resulting from claimed infringements of patents,
trademarks or copyrights of third parties. The terms of these indemnification agreements are
generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum amount of potential
future indemnification is unlimited. To date the Company has not paid any amounts to settle claims
or defend lawsuits pursuant to any indemnification obligation. The Company is unable to reasonably
estimate the maximum amount that could be payable under these arrangements since these obligations
are not capped but are conditional to the unique facts and circumstances involved. Accordingly, the
Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010.
14. Subsequent Event
On November 19, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an Australian-based company,
pursuant to which Aruba acquired substantially all of the assets of the Australian-based company.
The asset purchase was completed on December 3, 2010. The total consideration was $5.8 million and
included $3.8 million in cash and 86,852 shares of common stock valued at $2.0 million.
19
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations |
In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. These statements include, among other things, statements concerning our expectations:
| that revenues from our indirect channels will continue to constitute a
significant majority of our future revenues; |
|
| that our product offerings, in particular our products that
incorporate 802.11n wireless LAN standard technologies, will enable
broader networking initiatives by both our current and potential
customers; |
|
| that, within our indirect channel, sales through our VADs will grow,
which will negatively impact our gross margins as VADs experience a
larger net effective discount than our other channel partners; |
|
| that international revenues will remain consistent or increase in
absolute dollars and remain consistent or decrease as a percentage of
total revenues in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010; |
|
| that we will continue to hire employees throughout the company; |
|
| that we will continue to invest significantly in our research and
development efforts; |
|
| that research and development expenses for fiscal 2011 will increase
on an absolute dollar basis and remain consistent or increase as a
percentage of revenue compared with fiscal 2010; |
|
| that we will continue to invest strategically in our sales and
marketing efforts; |
|
| that sales and marketing expenses for fiscal 2011 will continue to be
our most significant operating expense and will increase on an
absolute dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue compared
with fiscal 2010; |
|
| that general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2011 will increase
on an absolute dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue
compared with fiscal 2010; |
|
| that ratable product and related professional services and support
revenues will decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
total revenues in future periods; |
|
| that, as we expand internationally, we may incur additional costs to
conform our products to comply with local laws and product
specifications and plan to continue to hire additional technical
support personnel to support our growing international customer base; |
|
| regarding the sufficiency of our existing cash, cash equivalents,
short-term investments and cash generated from operations, and |
|
| that we will increase our market penetration and extend our geographic
reach through our network of channel partners, |
as well as other statements regarding our future operations, financial condition and prospects and
business strategies. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but
are not limited to, those discussed in this report, and in particular, the risks discussed under
the heading Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this report and those discussed in other
documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to revise
or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements. Given these
risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read together with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
report.
20
Table of Contents
Overview
We are a global leader in distributed enterprise networks that securely connect local and
remote users to corporate IT resources. Our award-winning portfolio of campus, branch office,
teleworker, and mobile solutions simplify operations and provide secure access to all corporate
applications and services regardless of a users device, location, or network. The result is
improved productivity and lower capital and operating costs.
Our product portfolio encompasses: industry-leading high-speed 802.11a/b/g/n WLANs,
Virtual Branching Networking solutions for branch offices and teleworkers, network operations
tools, including spectrum analyzers, wireless intrusion prevention systems, and the AirWave
Wireless Management Suite for managing wired, wireless, and mobile device networks. These products
are key to our rightsizing initiative which allows companies to move toward a low-cost IT
infrastructure solution by funding wireless projects rather than wired LANs.
Our products have been sold to nearly 12,000 end customers worldwide (not including
customers of Alcatel-Lucent), including some of the largest and most complex global organizations.
We have implemented a two-tier distribution model in most areas of the world, including the United
States, with VADs selling our portfolio of products, including a variety of our support services,
to a diverse number of VARs. Our focus continues to be management of our channel including
selection and growth of high prospect partners, activation of our VARs and VADs through active
training and field collaboration, and evolution of our channel programs in consultation with our
partners.
Our ability to increase our product revenues will depend significantly on continued
growth in the market for enterprise mobility and remote networking solutions, continued acceptance
of our products in the marketplace, our ability to continue to attract new customers, our ability
to compete, the willingness of customers to displace wired networks with wireless LANs, in
particular, wireless LANs that utilize our 802.11n solution, and our ability to continue to sell
into our installed base of existing customers. Our growth in support revenues is dependent upon
increasing the number of products under support contracts, which is dependent on both growing our
installed base of customers and renewing existing support contracts. Our future profitability and
rate of growth, if any, will be directly affected by the continued acceptance of our products in
the marketplace, as well as the timing and size of orders, product and channel mix, average selling
prices, costs of our products and general economic conditions. Our future profitability will also
be affected by our ability to effectively implement and generate incremental business from our
two-tier distribution model, the extent to which we invest in our sales and marketing, research and
development, and general and administrative resources to grow our business, and current economic
conditions.
While we began to see improvements in the overall macroeconomic environment, and our
revenues have increased over the last six quarters, economic conditions worldwide have negatively
impacted our business since 2008. While we believe in the long-term growth prospects of the WLAN
market, the deterioration in overall economic conditions and in particular, tightening in the
credit markets and reduced spending by both enterprises and consumers have significantly impacted
various industries on which we rely for purchasing our products. This has led to our customers
deferring purchases in response to tighter credit, negative financial news and delayed budget
approvals. These factors could create significant and increasing uncertainty for the future as they
could continue to negatively impact technology spending for the products and services we offer and
materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
The revenue growth that we have experienced has been driven primarily by an expansion of
our customer base coupled with increased purchases from existing customers. We believe the growth
we have experienced is the result of business enterprises needing to provide secure mobility to
their users in a manner that we believe is more cost effective than the traditional approach of
using port-centric networks. While we have experienced both longer sales cycles and seasonality,
both of which have slowed our revenue growth, we believe that our product offerings, in particular
our products that incorporate 802.11n wireless LAN standard technologies, will enable broader
networking initiatives by both our current and potential customers.
Each quarter, our ability to meet our product revenue expectations is dependent upon (1)
new orders received, shipped, and recognized in a given quarter, (2) the amount of orders booked
but not shipped in the prior quarter that are shipped in the current quarter, and (3) the amount of
deferred revenue entering a given quarter. Our product deferred revenue is comprised of:
| product orders that have shipped but where the terms of the agreement, typically with
our large customers, contain acceptance terms and conditions or other terms that require
that the revenue be deferred until all revenue recognition criteria are met; |
|
| product orders shipped to our VADs for which we have not yet received persuasive
evidence from the VADs of a sale to an end customer; and |
|
| customer contracts that we entered into prior to our establishment of VSOE of fair value. |
We typically ship products within a reasonable time period after the receipt of an order.
On September 2, 2010, we completed our acquisition of Azalea Networks for a total
purchase price of $42.0 million which included common stock, cash, and contingent rights. Azalea is
a leading supplier of outdoor mesh networks and includes an operations center in Beijing, China
that will complement our existing research and development centers. As part of the acquisition, we
recorded $5.5 million of tangible assets, $17.0 million of intangible assets and $24.8 million of
goodwill. We recorded a liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent rights which was
based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 instrument.
Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and reflect our own assumptions in measuring fair value. Gains and losses on the
remeasurement of the liability are included in other income (expense), net.
21
Table of Contents
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses
Revenues
We derive our revenues from sales of our ArubaOS operating system, controllers, wired and
wireless access points, application software modules, multi-vendor management solution software,
and professional services and support. Professional services revenues consist of consulting and
training services. Consulting services primarily consist of installation support services. Training
services are instructor led courses on the use of our products. Support services typically consist
of software updates, on a when-and-if available basis, telephone and internet access to technical
support personnel and hardware support. We provide customers with rights to unspecified software
product upgrades and to maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support
period.
We sell our products directly through our sales force and indirectly through VADs, VARs,
and OEMs. We expect revenues from indirect channels to continue to constitute a significant
majority of our future revenues.
We sell our products to channel partners and end customers located in the Americas,
Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. Shipments to our channel partners that are
located in the United States are classified as U.S. revenue regardless of the location of the end
customer. We continue to expand into international locations and introduce our products in new
markets, and we expect international revenues to remain consistent or increase in absolute dollars
and remain consistent or decrease as a percentage of total revenues in fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010. For more information about our international revenues, see Note 12 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of product revenues consists primarily of manufacturing costs for our products,
shipping and logistics costs, and expenses for inventory obsolescence and warranty obligations. We
utilize third parties to manufacture our products and perform shipping logistics. We have
outsourced the substantial majority of our manufacturing, repair and supply chain operations.
Accordingly, the substantial majority of our cost of revenues consists of payments to our contract
manufacturers. Our contractor manufacturers produce our products in China and Singapore using
quality assurance programs and standards that we jointly established. Manufacturing, engineering
and documentation controls are conducted at our facilities in Sunnyvale, California, Bangalore,
India and Beijing, China. Cost of product revenues also includes amortization expense from our
purchased intangible assets.
Cost of professional services and support revenues is primarily comprised of personnel
costs, including stock-based compensation, of providing technical support, including personnel
costs associated with our internal support organization. In addition, we employ a third-party
support vendor to complement our internal support resources, the costs of which are included within
costs of professional services and support revenues.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin has been, and will continue to be, affected by a variety of factors,
including:
| the proportion of our products that are sold through direct versus indirect channels; |
|
| product mix and average selling prices; |
|
| new product introductions, such as our value-priced, high performance 802.11n access
point, and product enhancements made by us as well as those made by our competitors; |
|
| pressure to discount our products in response to our competitors discounting practices; |
|
| demand for our products and services; |
|
| our ability to attain volume manufacturing pricing from our contract manufacturers and our
component suppliers; |
|
| losses associated with excess and obsolete inventory; |
|
| growth in our headcount and other related costs incurred in our customer support organization; |
|
| costs associated with manufacturing overhead; |
|
| our ability to manage freight costs; and |
|
| amortization expense from our purchased intangible assets. |
22
Table of Contents
Due to higher net effective discounts for products sold through our indirect channel, our
overall gross margins for indirect channel sales are typically lower than those associated with
direct sales. We expect product revenues from our indirect channel to continue to constitute a
significant majority of our total revenues, which, by itself, negatively impacts our gross margins.
Further, we expect that within our indirect channel, sales through our VADs will grow which will
negatively impact our gross margins as VADs experience a larger net effective discount than our
other channel partners.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and
administrative expenses. The largest component of our operating expenses is personnel costs.
Personnel costs consist of salaries, benefits and incentive compensation for our employees,
including commissions for sales personnel and stock-based compensation for all employees.
Our headcount increased to 868 (including 87 employees from the Azalea acquisition) at
October 31, 2010 from 681 at July 31, 2010. Going forward, we expect to continue to hire employees
throughout the company as well as invest in research and development.
Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel costs and facilities
costs. We expense research and development expenses as incurred. We are devoting substantial
resources to the continued development of additional functionality for existing products and the
development of new products. We intend to continue to invest significantly in our research and
development efforts because we believe it is essential to maintaining our competitive position. For
fiscal 2011, we expect research and development expenses to increase on an absolute dollar basis
and remain consistent or increase as a percentage of revenue compared to fiscal 2010.
Sales and marketing expenses represent the largest component of our operating expenses
and primarily consist of personnel costs, sales commissions, marketing programs and facilities
costs. Marketing programs are intended to generate revenue from new and existing customers and are
expensed as incurred.
We plan to continue to invest strategically in sales and marketing with the intent to add
new customers and increase penetration within our existing customer base, expand our domestic and
international sales and marketing activities, build brand awareness and sponsor additional
marketing events. We expect future sales and marketing expenses to continue to be our most
significant operating expense. Generally, sales personnel are not immediately productive, and thus,
the increase in sales and marketing expenses that we experience as we hire additional sales
personnel is not expected to immediately result in increased revenues and reduces our operating
margins until such sales personnel become productive and generate revenue. Accordingly, the timing
of sales personnel hiring and the rate at which they become productive will affect our future
performance. For fiscal 2011, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase on an absolute
dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue compared to fiscal 2010.
General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel and facilities costs
related to our executive, finance, human resource, information technology and legal organizations,
as well as insurance, investor relations, and IT infrastructure costs related to our ERP system.
Further, our general and administrative expenses include professional services consisting of
outside legal, audit, Sarbanes-Oxley and information technology consulting costs. We have incurred
in the past, and continue to incur, significant legal costs defending ourselves against claims made
by third parties. These expenses are expected to continue as part of our ongoing operations and
depending on the timing and outcome of lawsuits and the legal process, can have a significant
impact on our financial statements. For fiscal 2011, we expect general and administrative expenses
to increase on an absolute dollar basis and decrease as a percentage of revenue compared to fiscal
2010.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net includes interest income on cash balances, accretion of discount
or amortization of premium on short-term investments, losses or gains on remeasurement of non-U.S.
dollar transactions into U.S. dollars, and in connection with our acquisition of Azalea, changes in
the fair value of our contingent rights liability. Cash has historically been invested in money
market funds and marketable securities.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These
accounting principles require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. We believe that the
estimates and judgments upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at
the time that these estimates and judgments are made. To the extent there are material differences
between these estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.
The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates and judgments and which we
believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial
results include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, inventory valuation, allowances for
doubtful accounts, income taxes, and goodwill and purchased intangible assets.
23
Table of Contents
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,
2010. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 except for the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU
2009-14. In October 2009, the FASB
amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to remove tangible products containing
software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the products
essential functionality from the scope of industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
In October 2009, the FASB also amended the accounting standards for multiple-element revenue
arrangements to:
(i) | provide updated guidance on how the elements in a
multiple-element arrangement should be separated, and how the
consideration should be allocated; |
||
(ii) | require an entity to allocate revenue amongst the elements in an
arrangement using estimated selling price (ESP) if a vendor
does not have VSOE of the selling price or third-party evidence
(TPE) of the selling price; and |
||
(iii) | eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. |
We
adopted this accounting guidance at the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal 2011 on a
prospective basis for applicable arrangements originating or materially modified after August 1,
2010. The impact of this adoption was not material to our financial position and results of
operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
This guidance does not generally change the units of accounting for our revenue transactions.
Most non-software products and services qualify as separate units of accounting because they have
value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and our revenue arrangements generally do not include
a general right of return relative to delivered products.
The majority of our products are hardware appliances containing software components that
function together to provide the essential functionality of the product. Therefore, our hardware
appliances are considered non-software elements and have been removed from the industry-specific
software revenue recognition guidance.
Our product revenue also includes revenue from the sale of stand-alone software products.
Stand-alone software products may operate on our hardware appliance, but are not considered
essential to the functionality of the hardware. Sales of stand-alone software generally include a
perpetual license to our software. Sales of stand-alone software continue to be subject to the
industry-specific software revenue recognition guidance.
For all arrangements originating or materially modified after July 31, 2010, we recognize
revenue in accordance with the amended accounting guidance. Certain arrangements with multiple-
elements may continue to have stand-alone software elements that are subject to the existing
software revenue recognition guidance along with non-software elements that are subject to the
amended revenue accounting guidance. The revenue for these multiple deliverable arrangements is
allocated to the stand-alone software elements as a group and the non-software elements based on
the relative selling prices of all of the elements in the arrangement using the fair value
hierarchy in the amended revenue accounting guidance.
For sales of stand-alone software after July 31, 2010 and for all transactions entered into
prior to the first quarter of 2011, we recognize revenue based on software revenue recognition
guidance. Under the software revenue recognition guidance, we use the residual method to recognize
revenue when a product agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and
VSOE of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. In the majority of our contracts, the
only element that remains undelivered at the time of delivery of the product is support services.
Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining
portion of the contract fee is recognized as product revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one
or more undelivered elements does not exist, all revenue is generally deferred and recognized when
delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be established. When the undelivered
element for which we do not have VSOE of fair value is support, revenue for the entire arrangement
is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.
VSOE for elements of an arrangement is based upon the normal pricing and discounting practices
for those services when sold separately, and VSOE for support services is measured by the
stand-alone renewal rate offered to the customer. In determining VSOE, we require that a
substantial majority of the selling prices for an element falls within a reasonably narrow pricing
range, generally evidenced by a substantial majority of such historical stand-alone transactions
falling within a reasonably narrow range of the median rates. In addition, we consider major
service groups, geographies, customer classifications, and other variables in determining VSOE.
We are typically not able to determine TPE for our products or services. TPE is determined
based on competitor prices for similar elements when sold separately. Generally, our go-to-market
strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings contain a significant level of
differentiation such that the comparable pricing of products with similar functionality cannot be
obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor products
selling prices are on a stand-alone basis.
24
Table of Contents
When we are unable to establish selling price of our non-software elements using VSOE or TPE,
we use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the
price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis.
We determine ESP for a product or service by considering multiple factors including, but not
limited to, cost of products, gross margin objectives, pricing practices, geographies, customer
classes and distribution channels.
We regularly review VSOE and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment
and updates of these estimates. There was not a material impact during the quarter nor do we
currently expect a material impact in the near term from changes in VSOE or ESP.
Product revenue consists of revenue from sales of our hardware appliances and perpetual
software licenses. We recognize product revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) we
have entered into a legally binding arrangement with a customer; (2) delivery has occurred; (3)
customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and significant
uncertainties; and (4) collection is reasonably assured.
For sales to direct end-users and channel partners, including value-added resellers,
value-added distributors, and OEMs, we recognize product revenue upon delivery, assuming all other
revenue recognition criteria are met. For our hardware appliances, delivery occurs upon transfer of
title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. It is our practice to identify an
end-user prior to shipment to a channel partner. For end-users and channel partners, we generally
have no significant obligations for future performance such as rights of return or pricing credits.
A portion of our sales are made through distributors under agreements allowing for stocking of our
products in their inventory, pricing credits and limited rights of return for stock rotation.
Product revenue on sales made through these distributors is initially deferred and revenue is
recognized upon sell-through as reported by the distributors to us. Shipping charges billed to
customers are included in product revenue and the related shipping costs are included in cost of
product revenue.
Support and services consist of support agreements, professional services, and training.
Support services include repair and replacement of defective hardware appliances, software updates
and access to technical support personnel. Software updates provide customers with rights to
unspecified software product upgrades and to maintenance releases and patches released during the
term of the support period. Revenue for support services is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the service contract term, which is typically one to three years. Professional services are
recognized upon delivery or completion of performance. Professional service arrangements are
typically short term in nature and are largely completed within 90 days from the start of service.
Training services are recognized upon delivery of the training.
Our fees are typically considered to be fixed or determinable at the inception of an
arrangement, generally based on specific products and quantities to be delivered. Substantially all
of our contracts do not include rights of return or acceptance provisions. To the extent that our
agreements contain such terms, we recognize revenue once the customer has accepted, or once the
acceptance provisions or right of return lapses. Payment terms to customers generally range from
net 30 to 60 days. In the event payment terms are provided that differ from our standard business
practices, the fees are deemed to not be fixed or determinable and revenue is recognized when the
payments become due, provided the remaining criteria for revenue recognition have been met.
We assess the ability to collect from our customers based on a number of factors, including
credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history of the customer. If the customer is
not deemed credit worthy, we defer revenue from the arrangement until payment is received and all
other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
25
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table presents our historical operating results as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated:
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Product |
83.2 | % | 82.0 | % | ||||
Professional services and support |
16.6 | % | 17.6 | % | ||||
Ratable product and related
professional services and
support |
0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||
Product |
26.5 | % | 28.5 | % | ||||
Professional services and support |
3.5 | % | 3.6 | % | ||||
Ratable product and related
professional services and
support |
0.0 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
Gross margin |
70.0 | % | 67.7 | % | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Research and development |
20.6 | % | 20.5 | % | ||||
Sales and marketing |
40.2 | % | 42.9 | % | ||||
General and administrative |
8.7 | % | 12.4 | % | ||||
Litigation reserves |
0.0 | % | 34.3 | % | ||||
Total operating expenses |
69.5 | % | 110.1 | % | ||||
Operating margin |
0.5 | % | (42.4 | %) | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
||||||||
Interest income |
0.3 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
2.0 | % | (0.2 | %) | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
2.8 | % | (42.2 | %) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
0.2 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||
Net income (loss) |
2.6 | % | (42.8 | %) | ||||
Revenues
The following table presents our revenues, by revenue source, for the periods presented:
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 83,147 | $ | 57,596 | ||||
Type of revenues: |
||||||||
Product |
69,204 | 47,198 | ||||||
Professional services and support |
13,800 | 10,143 | ||||||
Ratable product and related
professional services and support |
143 | 255 | ||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 83,147 | $ | 57,596 | ||||
Revenues by geography: |
||||||||
United States |
51,752 | 33,616 | ||||||
Europe, the Middle East and Africa |
13,153 | 7,632 | ||||||
Asia Pacific |
14,507 | 12,506 | ||||||
Rest of World |
3,735 | 3,842 | ||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 83,147 | $ | 57,596 | ||||
26
Table of Contents
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, total revenues increased 44.4% over the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 due to a $25.7 million increase in product and professional services and support
revenues. The increase in revenues was attributable to strong demand across all of our key
verticals and major geographies, and the significant growth in our customer base as we added
approximately 800 new customers during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Our right-sizing
initiative continues to gain momentum as companies move toward a low-cost IT infrastructure
solution, which we believe is due in part to the economic downturn and the rapid proliferation of
wi-fi enabled mobile devices. Historically, we have driven a majority of our growth from the
education, government, healthcare and high tech sectors. While we saw year-over-year growth in each
of these areas in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our largest gains were in the general
enterprise.
Our product revenues were bolstered by an increase in revenue related to our 802.11n access
points as new customers are rolling out 802.11n networks almost exclusively. The 11n access points
accounted for over 73.6% of overall access point shipments during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The increase in professional services and support revenues is a result of increased product and
first year support sales combined with the renewal of support contracts by existing customers.
Ratable product and related professional services and support revenues decreased in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to the run-off in the
amortization of deferred revenue associated with those customer contracts that we entered into
prior to our establishment of VSOE of fair value. The current balance of ratable deferred revenue,
and subsequent ratable revenue, relates entirely to our acquisition of Azalea. We expect ratable
product and related professional services and support revenues to continue to decrease in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of total revenues in future periods.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we derived 89.6% of our total revenues from indirect
channels, which consist of VADs, VARs and OEMs. In the same period of fiscal 2010, 91.4% of our
total revenues were generated from indirect channels. Going forward, we expect to continue to
derive a significant majority of our total revenues from indirect channels as we continue to focus
on improving the efficiency of marketing and selling our products through these channels.
Revenues from shipments to locations outside the United States increased $7.4 million during
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 largely due to strong
demand across all of our international markets. Most notably, revenue in our Europe, Middle East
and Africa region grew 72.3% year over year. We continue to expand into international locations
and introduce our products in new markets, and we expect international revenues to remain
consistent or increase in absolute dollars, and remain consistent or decrease as a percentage of
total revenues in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 83,147 | $ | 57,596 | ||||
Cost of product |
22,063 | 16,432 | ||||||
Cost of professional services and support |
2,905 | 2,079 | ||||||
Cost of ratable product and related professional services and support |
10 | 86 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues |
24,978 | 18,597 | ||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 58,169 | $ | 38,999 | ||||
Gross margin |
70.0 | % | 67.7 | % |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 cost of revenues increased 34.3% compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 due to the corresponding increase in our product revenue. The substantial
majority of our cost of product revenues consists of payments to Flextronics, our largest contract
manufacturer. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, payments to Flextronics and Flextronics-related
costs constituted more than 70% of our cost of product revenues.
Cost of professional services and support revenues increased 39.7% during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to the increase in professional
services and support revenue. We have benefitted from economies of scale within our professional
services department which has kept our costs down despite the large increase in professional
services and support revenues.
Cost of ratable product and related professional services and support revenues decreased
during these periods consistent with the decrease in ratable product and related professional
services and support revenues.
As we expand internationally, we may incur additional costs to conform our products to comply
with local laws or local product specifications. In addition, we plan to continue to hire
additional technical support personnel to support our growing international customer base.
Gross margins increased 2.3% during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 as we benefit from the higher margins associated with our 802.11n products.
Product gross margin increased 2.9% year over year due in part to product mix as more of our
product shipments were weighted toward our 802.11n family of access points and new lines of
controllers.
27
Table of Contents
Research and Development Expenses
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | 17,113 | $ | 11,796 | ||||
Percent of total revenues |
20.6 | % | 20.5 | % |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, research and development expenses increased 45.1%
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase of $3.7 million in
personnel and related costs, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.9 million. We
added 161 employees to our research and development team year over year, including 52 employees
from our acquisition of Azalea Networks. Expenses for consulting and outside agencies increased by
$0.7 million due to design and compliance work for our 11n access point and controllers.
Depreciation expenses increased $0.3 million due to an increase in tooling and equipment used in
research and development activities. Facilities expenses also increased $0.7 million related to
the increase in headcount.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Sales and marketing expenses |
$ | 33,415 | $ | 24,740 | ||||
Percent of total revenues |
40.2 | % | 42.9 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses increased 35.1% during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Personnel and related costs increased $5.3 million primarily
due to an increase in headcount of 90 new employees, including 6 employees from our Azalea
acquisition. An increase in stock-based compensation of $2.2 million contributed to the increase
in personnel and related costs. Facilities expenses increased $0.4 million as a result of the
increase in headcount. Recruiting expenses also increased $0.4 million as we hired more employees.
Commission expense increased $1.8 million year over year corresponding to the increase in revenue.
Lastly, marketing expenses increased $0.8 million due to website redesign fees and user-group
conventions we hosted.
General and Administrative Expenses
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
$ | 7,188 | $ | 7,132 | ||||
Percent of total revenues |
8.7 | % | 12.4 | % |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, general and administrative remained flat compared to
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Personnel expenses increased $0.1 million due to an increase in
headcount of 22 new employees, including 7 employees from our Azalea acquisition. Consequently,
facilities increased by $0.1 million. Expenses for outside services increased $0.1 million due to
fees paid to consultants working on our internal systems. These increases were offset by a
decrease of $0.5 million in legal fees as we completed the litigation with Motorola in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010.
Litigation Settlement
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we entered into a Patent Cross License and Settlement
Agreement with Motorola. As part of the Settlement Agreement, we agreed to pay Motorola
$19.8 million.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income and foreign currency
exchange gains and losses.
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 233 | $ | 211 | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
1,645 | (96 | ) | |||||
Total other income (expense), net |
$ | 1,878 | $ | 115 | ||||
28
Table of Contents
Interest income during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 remained flat from the first quarter
of fiscal 2010. Our average yield-to-maturity rate decreased slightly from 0.74% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 to 0.71% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Other income (expense), net increased during the during the first quarter of fiscal 2011
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as a result of the change in the valuation of our
contingent rights liability related to the acquisition of Azalea Networks. See Note 2 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the first quarter of fiscal 2011 we generated operating income. We also generated
consolidated book and taxable income in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions for the three months
ended October 31, 2010. For the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we generated consolidated book
losses but generated taxable income in most U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.
As of July 31, 2010, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $97.4 million and
$74.4 million for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively. We also had research and
development credit carryforwards of $6.4 million for federal and $8.0 million for state income tax
purposes as of July 31, 2010. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings,
if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, all federal and state deferred
tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. If not utilized, the federal and state
net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2013 and 2022. Utilization of
these net operating losses and credit carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation due to
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that are applicable if we have
experienced an ownership change in the past, or if an ownership change occurs in the future.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 146,404 | $ | 133,927 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
54,384 | 31,254 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 120,071 | $ | 124,167 |
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 16,034 | $ | 10,486 | ||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(408 | ) | (10,407 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by financing activities |
$ | 7,502 | $ | 2,677 |
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash, sweep funds and money market funds with an
original maturity of 90 days or less at the time of the purchase. Short-term investments include
corporate bonds, U.S. government agency securities, U.S. treasury bills, commercial paper and other
money market securities. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased $19.0 million
during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from $155.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments as of July 31, 2010 to $174.5 million as of October 31, 2010.
Most of our sales contracts are denominated in United States dollars including sales contracts
with international customers. As such, the increase in our revenues derived from international
customers has not affected our cash flows from operations as these are not affected by movement in
exchange rates. As we fund our international operations, our cash and cash equivalents are affected
by changes in exchange rates.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash flows from operating
activities will continue to be affected principally by our working capital requirements and the extent to which we increase spending on personnel. The timing of hiring sales personnel in particular affects cash flows as there is a lag between the hiring of sales personnel and the generation of revenue and cash flows from sales personnel. Our largest source of operating cash flows is cash collections
from our customers. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are for personnel related expenditures, purchases of inventory, and rent payments.
Cash provided by operating activities increased $5.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to increases in deferred revenue and other accrued liabilities, an increase in the amount of non-cash adjustments relating to stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization, and an increase in our net income. Cash provided
by operating activities was offset by decreases in accounts payable, increases in inventory and the change in the carrying value of our contingent liability resulting from the Azalea Networks acquisition.
29
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased $10.0
million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We continue to invest our excess cash
balances in short-term investments. Some of the proceeds from the sale and maturity of these
investments were used to purchase property and equipment of $2.9 million during the first quarter
of fiscal 2011. Further, on September 2, 2010, we completed the acquisition of Azalea Networks for
a purchase price of $42.0 million including $1.8 million in cash. See Note 2 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities increased $4.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The cash proceeds from the issuance of common
stock in conjunction with our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan increased
substantially year over year primarily due to increased exercise in stock options by our employees
as a result of the increase in our stock price, and the increase in the amount of contributions to
our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Based on our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments we expect that we will
have sufficient resources to fund our operations for the next 12 months. However, we may need to
raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness to continue to fund our operations in the
future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue
growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of expansion
into new territories, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing
products, and the continuing market acceptance of our products. Although we have no current
agreements, commitments, plans, proposals or arrangements, written or otherwise, with respect to
any material acquisitions, we may enter into these types of arrangements in the future, which could
also require us to seek additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available
on terms favorable to us or at all.
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations:
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | 1 - 3 years | 3 - 5 years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
$ | 15,556 | $ | 2,686 | $ | 5,496 | $ | 5,534 | $ | 1,840 | ||||||||||
Non-cancellable inventory purchase commitments (1) |
20,739 | 20,739 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 36,295 | $ | 23,425 | $ | 5,496 | $ | 5,534 | $ | 1,840 | ||||||||||
(1) | We outsource the production of our hardware to third-party manufacturing suppliers. We enter into various inventory related purchase agreements with these suppliers. Generally, under these agreements, 40% of the order quantities can be rescheduled or are cancelable by giving notice 60 days prior to the expected shipment date, and 20% of the order quantities can be rescheduled or are cancelable by giving notice 30 days prior to the expected shipment date. Orders are not cancelable within 30 days prior to the expected shipment date. |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Foreign Currency Risk
Most of our sales contracts are denominated in United States dollars, and therefore, our
revenue is not subject to significant foreign currency risk. Our operating expenses and cash flows
are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes
in the British Pound, Euro and Japanese Yen. To date, we have not entered into any hedging
contracts because expenses in foreign currencies have been insignificant to date, and exchange rate
fluctuations have had little impact on our operating results and cash flows.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $174.5 million and
$155.4 million at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments are held for working capital purposes. We do not use derivative financial
instruments in our investment portfolio. We have an investment portfolio of fixed income securities
that are classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities, like all fixed income
instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates
increase. We attempt to limit this exposure by investing primarily in short-term securities. Due to
the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, a movement of 10% in market
interest rates would not have a material impact on our operating results and the total value of the
portfolio over the next fiscal year. If overall interest rates had fallen by 10% in fiscal 2010,
our interest income on cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments would have declined less
than $0.1 million assuming consistent investment levels.
30
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule
13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and
procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures
relative to their costs.
Based on our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded
that, as of October 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable
assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required
to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial
reporting means a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles.
31
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are involved in claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary
course of business. We expect that the number and significance of these matters will increase as
our business expands. Any claims or proceedings against us, whether meritorious or not, could be
time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time, result
in the diversion of significant operational resources, or require us to enter into royalty or
licensing agreements which, if required, may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all.
If management believes that a loss arising from these matters is probable and can be reasonably
estimated, we record the amount of the loss. As additional information becomes available, any
potential liability related to these matters is assessed and the estimates revised. Based on
currently available information, management does not believe that the ultimate outcomes of these
unresolved matters, individually and in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainties, and our view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable
outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial
position and results of operations or liquidity for the period in which the unfavorable outcome
occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our business, operating results and growth rates may be adversely affected by unfavorable
economic and market conditions.
While we have seen improvements in the overall macroeconomic environment and our revenues
have increased, economic conditions worldwide have negatively impacted our business in our recent
history. While we believe in the long-term growth prospects of the WLAN market, the deterioration
in overall economic conditions and, in particular, tightening in the credit markets and reduced
spending by both enterprises and consumers have significantly impacted various industries on which
we rely for purchasing our products. This has led to reductions in capital expenditures by end user
customers for our products, longer sales cycles, the deferral or delay of purchase commitments for
our products, increased competition, and the deferral or delay of reviews by end user customers of
their existing infrastructure that could have otherwise driven demand for our products. These
factors have impacted our operating results and could create uncertainty for the future. For
example, as the U.S. and global economies weakened, in the second and third quarters of fiscal
2009, our total revenues decreased sequentially over the same period. In addition, our business
depends on the overall demand for IT and on the economic health of our current and prospective
customers. We cannot be assured of the level of IT spending, the deterioration of which could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations and growth rates. The purchase of our
products or willingness to replace existing infrastructure in some vertical markets may be
discretionary and may involve a significant commitment of capital and other resources. Therefore,
weak economic conditions, or a reduction in IT spending would likely adversely impact our business,
operating results and financial condition in a number of ways, including longer sales cycles, lower
prices for our products and services, and reduced unit sales. In addition, if interest rates rise
or foreign exchange rates weaken for our international customers, overall demand for our products
and services could be further dampened, and related IT spending may be reduced.
We compete in new and rapidly evolving markets and have a limited operating history, which
makes it difficult to predict our future operating results.
We were incorporated in February 2002 and began commercial shipments of our products in
June 2003. As a result of our limited operating history, it is very difficult to forecast our
future operating results. In addition, we operate in an industry characterized by rapid
technological change. Our prospects should be considered and evaluated in light of the risks and
uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in rapidly evolving markets characterized by
rapid technological change, changing customer needs, evolving industry standards and frequent
introductions of new products and services. These risks and difficulties include challenges in
accurate financial planning as a result of limited historical data and the uncertainties resulting
from having had a relatively limited time period in which to implement and evaluate our business
strategies as compared to older companies with longer operating histories.
In addition, our products are designed to be compatible with industry standards for
secure communications over wireless and wireline networks. As we encounter changing standards,
customer requirements and competitive pressures, we likely will be required to reposition our
product and service offerings and introduce new products and services. We may not be successful in
doing so in a timely and appropriately responsive manner, or at all. Our failure to address these
risks and difficulties successfully could materially harm our business and operating results.
32
Table of Contents
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our future results difficult to
predict and could cause our operating results to fall below expectations.
Our annual and quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate
significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control.
Furthermore, our product revenues generally reflect orders shipped in the same quarter
they are received, and a substantial portion of our orders are often received in the last month of
each fiscal quarter, a trend that may continue. As a result, if we are unable to ship orders
received in the last month of each fiscal quarter, even though we may have business indicators
about customer demand during a quarter, we may experience revenue shortfalls, and such shortfalls
may materially adversely affect our earnings because we may not be able to adequately and timely
adjust our expense levels.
In addition to other risk factors listed in this Risk Factors section, factors that may
cause our operating results to fluctuate include:
| the impact of unfavorable worldwide economic and market conditions, including the restricted credit environment impacting the credit of our channel partners and end user customers; | |
| our ability to develop and maintain our relationship with our VARs, VADs, OEMs and other partners; | |
| fluctuations in demand, sales cycles and prices for our products and services; | |
| reductions in customers budgets for information technology purchases and delays in their purchasing cycles; | |
| the sale of our products in the timeframes we anticipate, including the number and size of orders in each quarter; | |
| our ability to develop, introduce and ship in a timely manner, new products and product enhancements that meet customer requirements; | |
| our dependence on several large vertical markets, including the government, healthcare and education vertical markets; | |
| the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or by our competitors; | |
| any significant changes in the competitive dynamics of our markets, including new entrants, or further consolidation; | |
| our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses, and the costs of the components we purchase; | |
| product mix and average selling prices, as well as increased discounting of products by us and our competitors; | |
| the proportion of our products that are sold through direct versus indirect channels; | |
| our ability to maintain volume manufacturing pricing from our contract manufacturers, and our component suppliers; | |
| our contract manufacturers and component suppliers ability to meet our product demand forecasts; | |
| the potential need to record incremental inventory reserves for products that may become obsolete due to our new product introductions; | |
| growth in our headcount and other related costs incurred in our customer support organization; | |
| the timing of revenue recognition in any given quarter as a result of revenue recognition rules; | |
| the regulatory environment for the certification and sale of our products; and | |
| seasonal demand for our products, some of which may not be currently evident due to our revenue growth during fiscal 2010. |
Our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict even in the near term. In one or
more future quarterly periods, our operating results may fall below the expectations of securities
analysts and investors. In this event, the trading price of our common stock could decline
significantly.
33
Table of Contents
We have a history of losses and may not sustain profitability in the future.
We have a history of losses and only recently achieved profitability. As of October 31,
2010 and July 31, 2010, our accumulated deficit was $173.5 million and $175.6 million,
respectively. Expenses associated with the continued development and expansion of our business,
including expenditures to hire additional personnel for sales and marketing and technology
development, could limit our ability to sustain operating profits. If we fail to increase revenues
or manage our cost structure, we may not sustain profitability in the future. As a result, our
business could be harmed, and our stock price could decline.
Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable
time and expense. As a result, our sales are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from
quarter to quarter, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly.
The timing of our revenues is difficult to predict. Our sales efforts involve educating
our customers about the use and benefits of our products, including the technical capabilities of
our products and the potential cost savings achieved by organizations that utilize our products.
Customers typically undertake a significant evaluation process, which frequently involves not only
our products but also those of our competitors and can result in a lengthy sales cycle, which
typically ranges four to nine months in length but can be as long as 18 months. We spend
substantial time, effort and money in our sales efforts without any assurance that our efforts will
produce any sales. Over the last year, we have experienced longer sales cycles in connection with
customers evaluating our 802.11n solution and in light of general economic conditions in certain
verticals. In addition, product purchases are frequently subject to budget constraints, multiple
approvals, and unplanned administrative, processing and other delays. For example, during the
second quarter of fiscal 2008, we experienced a significant decrease in revenue in our federal
vertical market, which represents sales to United States governmental entities. We view the federal
vertical as highly dependent on large transactions, and therefore we could experience fluctuations
from period to period in this vertical. If sales expected from a specific customer for a particular
quarter are not realized in that quarter or at all, our business, operating results and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
The market in which we compete is highly competitive, and competitive pressures from existing and
new companies may have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues, growth rates and market
share.
The market in which we compete is highly competitive and is influenced by the following
competitive factors:
| comprehensiveness of the solution; | |
| performance of software and hardware products; | |
| ability to deploy easily into existing networks; | |
| interoperability with other devices; | |
| scalability of solution; | |
| ability to provide secure mobile access to the network; | |
| speed of mobile connectivity offering; | |
| return on investment; | |
| ability to allow centralized management of products; and | |
| ability to obtain regulatory and other industry certifications. |
We expect competition to intensify in the future as other companies introduce new
products in the same markets we serve or intend to enter and as the market continues to
consolidate. This competition could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins,
increased sales and marketing expenses and failure to increase, or the loss of, market share, any
of which would likely seriously harm our business, operating results or financial condition. If we
do not keep pace with product and technology advances, there could be a material adverse effect on
our competitive position, revenues and prospects for growth.
A number of our current or potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater
name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales,
marketing and other resources than we do. Potential customers may prefer to purchase from their
existing suppliers rather than a new supplier, regardless of product performance or features.
Currently, we compete with a number of large and well established public companies, including Cisco
Systems (primarily through its Wireless Networking Business Unit), Hewlett-Packard and Motorola, as
well as smaller companies and new market entrants, any of which could reduce our market share,
require us to lower our prices, or both.
34
Table of Contents
We expect increased competition from other established and emerging companies if our
market continues to develop and expand. Our channel partners could market products and services
that compete with our products and services. In addition, some of our competitors have made
acquisitions or entered into partnerships or other strategic relationships with one another to
offer a more comprehensive solution than they individually had offered. We expect this trend to
continue as companies attempt to strengthen or maintain their market positions in an evolving
industry and as companies enter into partnerships or are acquired. Many of the companies driving
this consolidation trend have significantly greater financial, technical and other resources than
we do and are better positioned to acquire and offer complementary products and technologies. The
companies resulting from these possible consolidations may create more compelling product offerings
and be able to offer greater pricing flexibility, making it more difficult for us to compete
effectively, including on the basis of price, sales and marketing programs, technology or product
functionality. Continued industry consolidation may adversely impact customers perceptions of the
viability of smaller and even medium-sized technology companies and, consequently, customers
willingness to purchase from such companies. These pressures could materially adversely affect our
business, operating results and financial condition.
We sell a majority of our products through VADs, VARs, and OEMs. If these channel partners on which
we rely do not perform their services adequately or efficiently, or if they exit the industry or
have financial difficulties, there could be a material adverse effect on our revenues and our cash
flow.
Our future success is highly dependent upon establishing and maintaining successful
relationships with a variety of VADs, VARs, and OEMs, which we refer to as our indirect channel. In
recent quarters, we have dedicated a significant amount of effort to increase the use of our VADs
and VARs in each of our theatres of operations. The percentage of our total revenues fulfilled from
sales through our indirect channel was 89.6% and 91.4% for the first quarter of fiscal years 2011
and 2010, respectively. We expect that over time, indirect channel sales will continue to
constitute a significant majority of our total revenues. Accordingly, our revenues depend in large
part on the effective performance of our channel partners. Three of our channel partners accounted
for more than 10% of total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The table below
represents the percentage of total revenues from our top channel partners (* represents less than
10%):
Three months ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Partner A |
20.3 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||
Partner B |
14.4 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||
Partner C |
11.2 | % | 10.6 | % | ||||
Partner D |
* | 11.2 | % |
Our agreements with our partners provide that they use reasonable commercial efforts to sell
our products on a perpetual basis unless the agreement is otherwise terminated by either party. Our
agreement with Alcatel-Lucent contains a most-favored nations clause, pursuant to which we agreed
to lower the price at which we sell products to Alcatel-Lucent in the event that we agree to sell
the same or similar products at a lower price to a similar customer on the same or similar terms
and conditions. However, the specific terms of this most-favored nations clause are narrow and
specific, and we have not to date incurred any obligations related to this term in the agreement.
Some of our indirect channel partners may have insufficient financial resources and may
not be able to withstand changes in worldwide business conditions, including economic downturns,
abide by our inventory and credit requirements, or have the ability to meet their financial
obligations to us. As of October 31, 2010, two of our channel partners individually accounted for
more than 10% of accounts receivable. Partner A accounted for 17.5% and Partner C accounted for
14.5% of total accounts receivable. As of July 31, 2010, Partner A accounted for 31.6% and Partner
B accounted for 18.2% of total accounts receivable. If the indirect channel partners on which we
rely do not perform their services adequately or efficiently, fail to meet their obligations to us,
or if they exit the industry and we are not able to quickly find adequate replacements, there could
be a material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flow and market share. By relying on these
indirect channels, we may have less contact with the end users of our products, thereby making it
more difficult for us to establish brand awareness, ensure proper delivery and installation of our
products, service ongoing customer requirements and respond to evolving customer needs. In
addition, our indirect channel partners may receive pricing terms that allow for volume discounts
off of list prices for the products they purchase from us, which reduce our margins to the extent
revenues from such channel partners increase as a proportion of our overall revenues.
Recruiting and retaining qualified channel partners and training them in our technology
and product offerings requires significant time and resources. In order to develop and expand our
distribution channel, we must continue to scale and improve our processes and procedures that
support our channel partners, including investment in systems and training, and those processes and
procedures may become increasingly complex and difficult to manage. We have no minimum purchase
commitments with any of our VADs, VARs, or OEMs, and our contracts with these channel partners do
not prohibit them from offering products or services that compete with ours or from terminating our
contract on short notice. Our competitors may be effective in providing incentives to existing and
potential channel partners to favor their products or to prevent or reduce sales of our products.
Our channel partners may choose not to focus primarily on the sale of our products or offer our
products at all. Our failure to establish and maintain successful relationships with indirect
channel partners would likely materially adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition.
35
Table of Contents
We depend upon the development of new products and enhancements to our existing products. If we
fail to predict and respond to emerging technological trends and our customers changing needs, we
may not be able to remain competitive.
We may not be able to anticipate future market needs or be able to develop new products
or product enhancements to meet such needs. For example, we anticipate a need to continue to
increase the mobility of our solution, and certain customers have delayed, and may in the future
delay, purchases of our products until either new versions of those products are available or the
customer evaluations are completed. If we fail to develop new products or product enhancements, our
business could be adversely affected, especially if our competitors are able to introduce solutions
with such increased functionality. In addition, as new mobile applications are introduced, our
success may depend on our ability to provide a solution that supports these applications.
We are active in the research and development of new products and technologies and
enhancing our current products. However, research and development in the enterprise mobility
industry is complex and filled with uncertainty. If we expend a significant amount of resources on
research and development and our efforts do not lead to the successful introduction of products
that are competitive in the marketplace, there could be a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results, financial condition and market share. In addition, it is common for research and
development projects to encounter delays due to unforeseen problems, resulting in low initial
volume production, fewer product features than originally considered desirable and higher
production costs than initially budgeted, which may result in lost market opportunities. In
addition, any new products or product enhancements that we introduce may not achieve any
significant degree of market acceptance or be accepted into our sales channel by our channel
partners. There could be a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial
condition and market share due to such delays or deficiencies in the development, manufacturing and
delivery of new products.
Once a product is in the marketplace, its selling price often decreases over the life of
the product, especially after a new competitive product is publicly announced. To lessen the effect
of price decreases, our product management team attempts to reduce development and manufacturing
costs in order to maintain or improve our margins. However, if cost reductions do not occur in a
timely manner, there could be a material adverse effect on our operating results and market share.
Further, the introduction of new products may decrease the demand for older products currently
included in our inventory balances. As a result, we may need to record incremental inventory
reserves for the older products that we do not expect to sell. This may have a material adverse
effect on our operating results and market share.
We manufacture our products to comply with standards established by various standards
bodies, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). If we are
not able to adapt to new or changing standards that are ratified by these bodies, our ability to
sell our products may be adversely affected. For example, prior to the ratification of the 802.11n
wireless LAN standard (11n) by the IEEE in 2009, we had been developing and were offering for
sale products that complied with the draft standard that the IEEE had not yet ratified. Although
the IEEE ratified the 11n standard and did not modify the draft of the 11n standard, the IEEE could
modify the standard in the future. We remain subject to any changes adopted by various standards
bodies, which would require us to modify our products to comply with the new standards, require
additional time and expense and could cause a disruption in our ability to market and sell the
affected products.
We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our
stockholders and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
In December 2010, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of an
Australian company and in September 2010, we completed our acquisition of Azalea Networks. We are
currently integrating the acquired products into our secure mobility solutions, as well as
providing products and continuing support to existing customers and partners of the acquired
businesses. The acquisition of Azalea was our first significant international acquisition, and, as
a result, our ability as an organization to complete and integrate international acquisitions is
unproven. In the future we may acquire other businesses, products or technologies. However, we may
not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete
acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately
strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals. These acquisitions and future
acquisitions may be viewed negatively by customers, financial markets or investors. In addition,
these acquisitions any future acquisitions that we make could lead to difficulties in integrating
personnel and operations from the acquired businesses and in retaining and motivating key personnel
from these businesses. Acquisitions may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from
day-to-day responsibilities, increase our expenses and adversely impact our business, operating
results and financial condition. Future acquisitions may reduce our cash available for operations
and other uses and could result in an increase in amortization expense related to identifiable
assets acquired, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt,
which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
As a result of the fact that we outsource the manufacturing of our products to contract
manufacturers, we do not have the ability to ensure quality control over the manufacturing process.
Furthermore, if there are significant changes in the financial or business condition of our
contract manufacturers, our ability to supply quality products to our customers may be disrupted.
As a result of the fact that we outsource the manufacturing of our products to contract
manufacturers, we are subject to the risk of supplier failure and customer dissatisfaction with the
quality or performance of our products. Quality or performance failures of our products or changes
in the financial or business condition of our contract manufacturers could disrupt our ability to
supply quality products to our customers and thereby have a material adverse effect on our
business, revenues and financial condition.
36
Table of Contents
Our orders with our contract manufacturers represent a relatively small percentage of the
overall orders received by them from their customers. As a result, fulfilling our orders may not be considered a priority in the event
our contract manufacturers are constrained in their abilities to fulfill all of their customer
obligations in a timely manner. We provide demand forecasts to our contract manufacturers. If we
overestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may assess charges, or we may have
liabilities for excess inventory, each of which could negatively affect our gross margins.
Conversely, because lead times for required materials and components vary significantly and depend
on factors such as the specific supplier, contract terms and the demand for each component at a
given time, if we underestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may have inadequate
materials and components required to produce our products. This could result in an interruption of
the manufacturing of our products, delays in shipments and deferral or loss of revenue. In
addition, on occasion we have underestimated our requirements, and, as a result, we have been
required to pay additional fees to our contract manufacturers in order for manufacturing to be
completed and shipments to be made on a timely basis.
If any of our contract manufacturers suffer an interruption in their business, or
experiences delays, disruptions or quality control problems in their manufacturing operations, or
we have to change or add additional contract manufacturers, our ability to ship products to our
customers would be delayed, and our business, operating results and financial condition would be
adversely affected.
Our contract manufacturers purchase some components, subassemblies and products from a single
supplier or a limited number of suppliers, and with respect to some of these suppliers, we have
entered into license agreements that allow us to use their components in our products. The loss of
any of these suppliers or the termination of any of these license agreements may cause us to incur
additional set-up costs, result in delays in manufacturing and delivering our products, or cause us
to carry excess or obsolete inventory.
Shortages in components that we use in our products are possible, and our ability to
predict the availability of such components may be limited. While components and supplies are
generally available from a variety of sources, we currently depend on a limited number of suppliers
for several components for our equipment and certain subassemblies and products. We rely on our
contract manufacturers to obtain the components, subassemblies and products necessary for the
manufacture of our products, including those components, subassemblies and products that are only
available from a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers.
For example, our solution incorporates both software products and hardware products,
including a series of high-performance programmable mobility controllers and a line of wired and
wireless access points. The chipsets that our contract manufacturers source and incorporate in our
hardware products are currently available only from a limited number of suppliers, with whom
neither we nor our contract manufacturers have entered into supply agreements. All of our access
points incorporate components from Atheros, and some of our mobility controllers incorporate
components from Broadcom and Netlogic. We have entered into license agreements with Atheros,
Broadcom and Netlogic, the termination of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business. Our license agreements with Atheros, Broadcom and Netlogic have perpetual terms in that
they will automatically be renewed for successive one-year periods unless the agreement is
terminated prior to the end of the then-current term. As there are no other sources for identical
components, in the event that our contract manufacturers are unable to obtain these components from
Atheros, Broadcom or Netlogic, we would be required to redesign our hardware and software in order
to incorporate components from alternative sources. All of our product revenues are dependent upon
the sale of products that incorporate components from Atheros, Broadcom or Netlogic.
In addition, for certain components, subassemblies and products for which there are
multiple sources, we are still subject to potential price increases and limited availability due to
market demand for such components, subassemblies and products. In the past, unexpected demand for
communication products caused worldwide shortages of certain electronic parts. If such shortages
occur in the future, our business would be adversely affected. We carry very little to no inventory
of our product components, and we and our contract manufacturers rely on our suppliers to deliver
necessary components in a timely manner. We and our contract manufacturers rely on purchase orders
rather than long-term contracts with these suppliers. As a result, even if available, we or our
contract manufacturers may not be able to secure sufficient components at reasonable prices or of
acceptable quality to build products in a timely manner and, therefore, may not be able to meet
customer demands for our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that may adversely
affect our operating results.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from customers outside the United States.
We have sales and technical support personnel in numerous countries worldwide. In addition, a
portion of our engineering and order management efforts are currently handled by personnel located
in India, and we expect to expand our offshore development efforts within India and possibly in
other countries. We expect to continue to add personnel in additional countries. Our international
operations subject us to a variety of risks, including:
| the difficulty of managing and staffing international offices and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with multiple international locations; | |
| difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable, and longer payment cycles, especially in emerging markets; | |
| the need to localize our products for international customers; | |
| tariffs and trade barriers, export regulations and other regulatory or contractual limitations on our ability to sell or develop our products in certain foreign markets; | |
| increased exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk; |
37
Table of Contents
| limited protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; and | |
| increased cost of terminating international employees in some countries. |
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in large part,
on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our
international operations. Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our
international operations and reduce our international sales, adversely affecting our business,
operating results and financial condition.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could
be harmed or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce our rights.
We depend on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We protect our
proprietary information and technology through licensing agreements, third-party nondisclosure
agreements and other contractual provisions, as well as through patent, trademark, copyright and
trade secret laws in the United States and similar laws in other countries. There can be no
assurance that these protections will be available in all cases or will be adequate to prevent our
competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise obtaining and using our technology,
proprietary rights or products. For example, the laws of certain countries in which our products
are manufactured or licensed do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws
of the United States. In addition, third parties may seek to challenge, invalidate or circumvent
our patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, or applications for any of the foregoing.
There can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are
substantially equivalent or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In
each case, our ability to compete could be significantly impaired. To prevent substantial
unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to prosecute actions for
infringement and/or misappropriation of our proprietary rights against third parties. Any such
action could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources and managements attention,
and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such action. Furthermore, many of our
current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to
enforce their intellectual property rights than we do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not
be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual
property.
Claims by others that we infringe their proprietary technology could harm our business.
Third parties have asserted and may in the future assert claims of infringement of
intellectual property rights against us or against our customers or channel partners for which we
may be liable. For example, in August 2007, Symbol Technologies, Inc. and Wireless Valley
Communications, Inc., both subsidiaries of Motorola, Inc., filed suit against us asserting
infringement of certain U.S. patents, and, in November 2009, we entered into a settlement agreement
with Motorola, Inc., Symbol Technologies, Inc. and Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
(collectively Motorola), pursuant to which we paid Motorola $19.8 million. Due to the rapid pace
of technological change in our industry, much of our business and many of our products rely on
proprietary technologies of third parties, and we may not be able to obtain, or continue to obtain,
licenses from such third parties on reasonable terms. As our business expands and the number of
products and competitors in our market increases and overlaps occur, we expect that infringement
claims may increase in number and significance. Intellectual property lawsuits are subject to
inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, and we cannot be
certain that we will be successful in defending ourselves against intellectual property claims.
Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial
damages or prevents us from distributing certain products or performing certain services. In
addition, we might be required to seek a license for the use of such intellectual property, which
may not be available on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Alternatively, we may be required
to develop non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense and may
ultimately not be successful. Any claims or proceedings against us, whether meritorious or not,
could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management
time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources, or require us to enter into
royalty or licensing agreements.
Impairment of our goodwill or other assets would negatively affect our results of operations.
Our acquisitions of Azalea Networks and AirWave Wireless, Inc. resulted in total goodwill
of $32.5 million. Together with our purchase of certain assets of Network Chemistry, Inc., we have
purchased intangible assets of $24.6 million as of October 31, 2010. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment at least annually or sooner under certain circumstances. Other intangible assets that
are deemed to have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives but must be reviewed
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these
assets may not be recoverable. Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist, or
if events or changes in circumstances have occurred, including market conditions, operating
fundamentals, competition and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment.
Therefore, we cannot assure you that a charge to operations will not occur as a result of future
goodwill and intangible asset impairment tests. If impairment is deemed to exist, we would write
down the recorded value of these intangible assets to their fair values. If and when these
write-downs do occur, they could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
38
Table of Contents
If we lose members of our senior management or are unable to recruit and retain key employees on a
cost-effective basis, we may not be able to successfully grow our business. If we fail to effectively integrate new officers into our
organization, our business could be harmed.
Our success is substantially dependent upon the performance of our senior management. All
of our executive officers are at-will employees, and we do not maintain any key-man life insurance
policies. The loss of the services of any members of our management team may significantly delay or
prevent the achievement of our product development and other business objectives and could harm our
business. Our success also is substantially dependent upon our ability to attract additional
personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly in our sales, research and development,
and customer service departments. For example, unless and until we hire a Vice President of
Worldwide Sales, our Chief Executive Officer will fill this role in addition to his other
responsibilities. Experienced management and technical, sales, marketing and support personnel in
the IT industry are in high demand, and competition for their talents is intense. We may not be
successful in attracting and retaining such personnel on a timely basis, on competitive terms, or
at all. The loss of, or the inability to recruit, such employees could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our future performance will depend in part on our ability to successfully integrate any
new executive officers into our management team and develop an effective working relationship among
senior management. If we fail to integrate these individuals and create effective working
relationships among them and other members of management, our business operating results and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
If we fail to manage future growth effectively, our business would be harmed.
We have expanded our operations significantly since inception and anticipate that further
significant expansion will be required. We intend to increase our market penetration and extend our
geographic reach through our network of channel partners. We also plan to increase offshore
operations by establishing additional offshore capabilities for certain engineering functions. This
future growth, if it occurs, will place significant demands on our management, infrastructure and
other resources. To manage any future growth, we will need to hire, integrate and retain highly
skilled and motivated employees. If we do not effectively manage our growth, our business,
operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our ability to sell our products is highly dependent on the quality of our support and
services offerings, and our failure to offer high quality support and services would have a
material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.
Once our products are deployed within our end customers networks, they depend on our
support organization to resolve any issues relating to our products. A high level of support is
critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products. If we or our channel partners do
not effectively assist our end customers in deploying our products, succeed in helping our end
customers quickly resolve post-deployment issues, or provide effective ongoing support, it would
adversely affect our ability to sell our products to existing customers and could harm our
reputation with potential customers. In addition, as we expand our operations internationally, our
support organization will face additional challenges including those associated with delivering
support, training and documentation in languages other than English. As a result, our failure, or
the failure of our channel partners, to maintain high quality support and services would have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Enterprises are increasingly concerned with the security of their data, and to the extent they
elect to encrypt data between the end user and the server, our products will become less effective.
Our products depend on the ability to identify applications. Our products currently do
not identify applications if the data is encrypted as it passes through our mobility controllers.
Since most organizations currently encrypt most of their data transmissions only between sites and
not on the LAN, the data is not encrypted when it passes through our mobility controllers. If more
organizations elect to encrypt their data transmissions from the end user to the server, our
products will offer limited benefits unless we have been successful in incorporating additional
functionality into our products that address those encrypted transmissions. At the same time, if
our products do not provide the level of network security expected by our customers, our reputation
and brand would be damaged, and we would expect to experience decreased sales. Our failure to
provide such additional functionality and expected level of network security could adversely affect
our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our products are highly technical and may contain undetected hardware errors or software bugs,
which could cause harm to our reputation and adversely affect our business.
Our products are highly technical and complex and, when deployed, are critical to the
operation of many networks. Our products have contained and may contain undetected errors, bugs or
security vulnerabilities. Some errors in our products may only be discovered after a product has
been installed and used by customers. Any errors, bugs, defects or security vulnerabilities
discovered in our products after commercial release could result in loss of revenues or delay in
revenue recognition, loss of customers, damage to our brand and reputation, and increased service
and warranty cost, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition. In addition, we could face claims for product liability, or breach of
warranty, including claims relating to changes to our products made by our channel partners. Our
contracts with customers contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability
limitations, which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and
may divert managements attention and adversely affect the markets perception of us and our
products. In addition, if our business liability insurance coverage proves inadequate or future
coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our business, operating results and
financial condition could be adversely impacted.
39
Table of Contents
Our use of open source software could impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our
products.
We incorporate open source software into our products. Although we monitor our use of
open source closely, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S.
courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose
unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products. In such
event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our
products, to re-engineer our products or to discontinue the sale of our products in the event
re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis, any of which could adversely affect our
business, operating results and financial condition.
We rely on the availability of third-party licenses.
Many of our products are designed to include software or other intellectual property
licensed from third parties. It may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating
to various aspects of these products. There can be no assurance that the necessary licenses would
be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses or other
rights or to obtain such licenses or rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in litigation
regarding these matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results,
and financial condition. Moreover, the inclusion in our products of software or other intellectual
property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis could limit our ability to protect our
proprietary rights in our products.
Enterprises may have slow WAN connections between some of their locations that may cause our
products to become less effective.
Our mobility controllers and network management software were initially designed to
function at LAN-like speeds in an office building or campus environment. In order to function
appropriately, our mobility controllers synchronize with each other over network links. The ability
of our products to synchronize may be limited by slow or congested data-links, including DSL and
dial-up. Our failure to provide such additional functionality could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
New safety regulations or changes in existing safety regulations related to our products may
result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and future sales, and could place additional burdens on the
operations of our business.
Radio emissions are subject to regulation in the United States and in other countries in
which we do business. In the United States, various federal agencies including the Center for
Devices and Radiological Health of the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Communications
Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and various state agencies have
promulgated regulations that concern the use of radio/electromagnetic emissions standards. Member
countries of the European Union (EU) have enacted similar standards concerning electrical safety
and electromagnetic compatibility and emissions standards.
If any of our products becomes subject to new regulations or if any of our products
becomes specifically regulated by additional government entities, compliance with such regulations
could become more burdensome, and there could be a material adverse effect on our business and our
results of operations.
In addition, our wireless communication products operate through the transmission of
radio signals. Currently, operation of these products in specified frequency bands does not require
licensing by regulatory authorities. Regulatory changes restricting the use of frequency bands or
allocating available frequencies could become more burdensome and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and future sales.
Compliance with environmental matters and worker health and safety laws could be costly, and
noncompliance with these laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
expenses and financial condition.
Some of our operations use substances regulated under various federal, state, local and
international laws governing the environment and worker health and safety, including those
governing the discharge of pollutants into the ground, air and water, the management and disposal
of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of our products are
subject to various federal, state, local and international laws governing chemical substances in
electronic products. We could be subject to increased costs, fines, civil or criminal sanctions,
third-party property damage or personal injury claims if we violate or become liable under
environmental and/or worker health and safety laws.
We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could subject us to liability
or impair our ability to compete in international markets.
Because we incorporate encryption technology into our products, our products are subject
to U.S. export controls and may be exported outside the United States only with the required level
of export license or through an export license exception. In addition, various countries regulate
the import of certain encryption technology and radio frequency transmission equipment and have
enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products or could limit our customers
ability to implement our products in those countries. Changes in our products or changes in export
and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our products in international
markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our products throughout
their global systems or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain
countries altogether. Any change in export or import regulations or related legislation, shift in
approach to the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, persons or
technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by, or in
our decreased ability to export or sell our products to, existing or potential customers with
international operations.
40
Table of Contents
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, floods and other natural
catastrophic events, and to interruption by manmade problems such as computer viruses or terrorism.
Our corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for
seismic activity. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or a flood, occurring
at our headquarters or in either China or Singapore, where our major contract manufacturers are
located, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial
condition. In addition, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar
disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. In addition, acts of terrorism
could cause disruptions in our or our customers businesses or the economy as a whole. To the
extent that such disruptions result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, or the
deployment of our products, our business, operating results and financial condition would be
adversely affected.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
Our stock price may be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile and could
be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our
control. Factors that could affect the trading price of our common stock could include:
| variations in our operating results; | |
| announcements of technological innovations, new products or product enhancements, strategic alliances or significant agreements by us or by our competitors; | |
| the gain or loss of significant customers; | |
| recruitment or departure of key personnel; | |
| the impact of unfavorable worldwide economic and market conditions; | |
| falling short of guidance on our financial results; | |
| changes in estimates of our operating results or changes in recommendations by any securities analysts who follow our common stock; | |
| significant sales, or announcement of significant sales, of our common stock by us or our stockholders; and | |
| adoption or modification of regulations, policies, procedures or programs applicable to our business. |
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in
particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Broad market and industry factors
may seriously affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating
performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and
the market price of a particular companys securities, securities class action litigation has often
been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our managements attention and resources.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or
if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading
volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports
that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who
cover us issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price would likely
decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports
on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our
stock price or trading volume to decline.
Insiders have substantial control over us and will be able to influence corporate matters.
As of October 31, 2010, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates
beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 23.7% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to
exercise significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the
election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other
sale of our company or its assets. This concentration of ownership could limit stockholders
ability to influence corporate matters and may have the effect of delaying or preventing a third
party from acquiring control over us.
41
Table of Contents
We may choose to raise additional capital. Such capital may not be available, or may be
available on unfavorable terms, which would adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
We expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents balances will be sufficient to meet
our working capital and capital expenditure needs for the foreseeable future. If we choose to raise
additional funds, due to unforeseen circumstances or material expenditures, we cannot be certain
that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all, and any
additional financings could result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders.
Provisions in our charter documents, Delaware law, employment arrangements with certain of our
executive officers, and our OEM supply agreement with Alcatel-Lucent could discourage a takeover
that stockholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying
or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include but are
not limited to the following:
| our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors; | |
| our stockholders may not act by written consent or call special stockholders meetings; as a result, a holder, or holders, controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be able to take certain actions other than at annual stockholders meetings or special stockholders meetings called by the board of directors, the chairman of the board, the Chief Executive Officer or the president; | |
| our certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates; | |
| stockholders must provide advance notice and additional disclosures in order to nominate individuals for election to the board of directors or to propose matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirors own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company; and | |
| our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock; the ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us. |
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to certain Delaware anti-takeover
provisions. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not engage in a business combination with any
holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or,
among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. Our board of directors
could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of us.
Certain of our executive officers may be entitled to accelerated vesting of their stock
options pursuant to the terms of their employment arrangements upon a change of control of Aruba.
In addition to the arrangements currently in place with some of our executive officers, we may
enter into similar arrangements in the future with other officers. Such arrangements could delay or
discourage a potential acquisition of Aruba.
In addition, our OEM supply agreement with Alcatel-Lucent provides that, in the event of
a change of control that would cause Alcatel-Lucent to purchase our products from an entity that is
an Alcatel-Lucent competitor, we must, without additional consideration, (1) provide Alcatel-Lucent
with any information required by Alcatel-Lucent to make, test and support the products that we
distribute through our OEM relationship with Alcatel-Lucent, including all hardware designs and
software source code, and (2) otherwise cooperate with Alcatel-Lucent to transition the
manufacturing, testing and support of these products to Alcatel-Lucent. We are also obligated to
promptly inform Alcatel-Lucent if and when we receive an inquiry concerning a bona fide proposal or
offer to effect a change of control and will not enter into negotiations concerning a change of
control without such prior notice to Alcatel-Lucent. Each of these provisions could delay or result
in a discount to the proceeds our stockholders would otherwise receive upon a change of control or
could discourage a third party from making a change of control offer.
42
Table of Contents
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant increased costs as a result of
operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to
new compliance initiatives.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Stock Market, have imposed various requirements
on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management
and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover,
these rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and will make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations
to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial
costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our
board committees or as executive officers.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to furnish a report by our management on
our internal control over financial reporting. Such report contains, among other matters, an
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of
our fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial
reporting is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting identified by management. While we were able to assert in
our Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010, filed on September 24, 2010 that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of July 31, 2010, we must continue to monitor and
assess our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to assert in any future
reporting period that our internal control over financial reporting is effective (or if our
independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness
of our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of
our financial reports, which would have an adverse effect on our stock price.
43
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities
On May 7, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase Azalea Networks. The
acquisition subsequently closed on September 2, 2010. In connection with the closing, the Company
issued 1,524,517 shares of its common stock to the former Azalea shareholders and certain Azalea
debtholders, subject to certain adjustments and an escrow holdback. The issuance of such shares of
common stock by the Company is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) thereof.
(b) Purchases of Equity Securities by
the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4.
Reserved.
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
44
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
2.2 | Scheme of Arrangement between Azalea Networks, Aruba Networks, Inc., the Scheme Shareholders (as
defined therein) and the Bridge Noteholders (as defined therein) (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3,
2010) |
|||
10.1 | * | Executive Officer Bonus Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2010) |
||
10.2 | * | Consulting Agreement, dated August 1, 2010, by and between Aruba Networks, Inc. and Bernard Guidon |
||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.1 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: December 10, 2010
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Dominic P. Orr | |||
Dominic P. Orr | ||||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Dated: December 10, 2010 | ||||
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Steffan Tomlinson | |||
Steffan Tomlinson | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
46
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
2.2 | Scheme of Arrangement between Azalea Networks, Aruba Networks, Inc., the Scheme Shareholders (as
defined therein) and the Bridge Noteholders (as defined therein) (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3,
2010) |
|||
10.1 | * | Executive Officer Bonus Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2010) |
||
10.2 | * | Consulting Agreement, dated August 1, 2010, by and between Aruba Networks, Inc. and Bernard Guidon |
||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.1 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
47