Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - Sentio Healthcare Properties Inc | v203902_8k.htm |
EXHIBIT
99.1
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. See also
“Special Note about Forward Looking Statements” preceding Item 1 of this
report.
Overview
We were
incorporated on October 16, 2006 for the purpose of engaging in the business of
investing in and owning commercial real estate. We intend to invest the net
proceeds from the Offering primarily in investment real estate including health
care, multi-tenant industrial, net-leased retail properties and other real
estate related assets located in major metropolitan markets in the United
States. As of December 31, 2009, we raised approximately $49.1 million of gross
proceeds from the sale of approximately 4.9 million shares of our common stock,
and we had acquired four real estate properties.
Our
revenues, which are comprised largely of rental income, include rents reported
on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Our growth depends,
in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income
from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels; (ii) maximize
tenant recoveries given the underlying lease structures; and (iii) control
operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific,
market specific, general economic and other conditions.
Our
results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 reflect
growing operational revenues and expenses resulting from the acquisition of
properties and interest expense resulting from the use of acquisition
financing.
2009
Transaction Overview
Caruth
Haven Court, Highland Park, Texas
On
January 22, 2009, we purchased an existing assisted–living facility, Caruth
Haven Court, from SHP II Caruth, LP, a non-related party, for a purchase price
of approximately $20.5 million. Caruth Haven Court consists of 91 assisted
living units in a 74,647 square foot building built in 1999, located on
approximately 2.2 acres of land in the Highland Park area north of Dallas,
Texas.
The
acquisition was funded with net proceeds raised from our ongoing public offering
and a $14.0 million secured bridge loan obtained from Cornerstone Operating
Partnership, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cornerstone Core Properties
REIT, Inc., a publicly offered, non-traded REIT sponsored by affiliates of our
sponsor. The $14.0 million loan was repaid on December 16, 2009 without
incurring any prepayment penalty, with the proceeds from our offering and a new
$10.0 million first mortgage loan. The $10.0 million loan bears a fixed rate of
6.43% per annum and amortized on a 30-year basis.
The
Oaks Bradenton, Bradenton, Florida
On May 1,
2009, we purchased an existing assisted–living facility, The Oaks Bradenton,
from Oaks Holding LLC, a non-related party, for a purchase price of
approximately $4.5 million. The Oaks Bradenton consists of 36 assisted living
units in two buildings with total rentable square footage of approximately
18,172 square feet, both built in 1996, located on approximately 2.0 acres of
land in Bradenton, Florida.
The
acquisition was funded with net proceeds raised from our ongoing public offering
and a $2.8 million loan from an unaffiliated lender. The loan matures on May 1,
2014 with no option to extend and bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% per
annum. We may repay the loan, in whole or in part, on or before May 1, 2014,
subject to prepayment premiums.
GreenTree,
Columbus, Indiana
On
December 30, 2009, we purchased an existing assisted–living facility, GreenTree
at Westwood, from GreenTree at Westwood, LLC, an unaffiliated party, for a
purchase price of approximately $5.2 million. GreenTree at Westwood consists of
58 assisted living units in a 50,249 square foot building built in 1998, located
on approximately 4.0 acres of land in Columbus, Indiana.
1
The
acquisition was funded with net proceeds raised from our ongoing public offering
but we may later place mortgage debt on the property. Under the purchase and
sale agreement executed in connection with the acquisition, a portion of the
purchase price for the property is to be calculated and paid to the seller as
earnout payments based upon the net operating income, as defined, of the
property during each of the three-years following our acquisition of the
property. The maximum aggregate amount that the seller may receive under the
earnout provision is $1.0 million.
Mesa
Vista Inn Health Center, San Antonio, TX
On
December 31, 2009, we purchased a skilled nursing facility, Mesa Vista Inn
Health Center from SNF Mesa Vista, LLC, an unaffiliated party, for a purchase
price of approximately $13.0 million. Mesa Vista Inn Health Center is a 96-unit,
144-bed, skilled nursing facility situated on approximately 6.4 acres of land in
San Antonio, TX. The approximately 55,525 square-foot facility, which was built
in 2008, is 100% net-leased to PM Management – Babcock NC, LLC, an affiliate of
Harden Healthcare, LLC.
The
acquisition was funded with net proceeds of approximately $5.5 million raised
from our ongoing public offering and the assumption of $7.5 million of existing
debt financing on the property. The loan matures on January 5, 2015 and bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum. We may repay the loan, in whole or
in part, on or before January 5, 2015 without incurring any prepayment
penalty.
Results
of Operations
We began
accepting subscriptions for shares under our initial public offering on June 20,
2008. Operating results in future periods will depend on the results of the
operation of the real estate properties that we acquire. As of December 31,
2008, we had not purchased any properties. We did not engage in any real estate
operations and, accordingly, had no income nor property expenses.
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Net
operating income, as defined (1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Senior
living operations
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Triple-net
leased properties
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
Total
portfolio net operating income
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Reconciliation
to net loss:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
operating income, as defined (1)
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Unallocated
(expenses) income:
|
||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,206,000
|
)
|
(875,000
|
)
|
331,000
|
37.8
|
||||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
(211,000
|
)
|
-
|
211,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
Real
estate acquisitions costs
|
(1,814,000
|
)
|
(358,000
|
)
|
1,456,000
|
406.7
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
(1,367,000
|
)
|
-
|
1,367,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
13,000
|
7,000
|
(6,000
|
)
|
85.7
|
|||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,053,000
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
1,052,000
|
1,052.0
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,227,00
|
)
|
$
|
2,922,000
|
238.1
|
(1) Net operating income is defined as
total revenue less property operating and maintenance
expenses.
Senior Living
Operations
Net
operating income for senior living operations is defined as total revenue less
property operating and maintenance expenses. Total revenue includes rental
revenue and resident fees and service income. Property operating and maintenance
includes expenses such as labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and
other property operating costs. Net operating income increased to $1.5
million from $0 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the
comparable period of 2008. The increase is primarily due to new acquisitions
completed during the year ended December 31, 2009.
2
Triple-Net Leased
Properties
Net
operating income for triple-net leased properties is defined as total revenue
less property operating and maintenance expenses. Total revenue includes rental
revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no net operating income for our triple-net
leased properties.
Unallocated
(expenses)income
General
and administrative expenses increased to $1.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from $0.9 million for the 2008 year, primarily due to
increased tax and accounting fees, higher board of director fees associated with
increased operating activity in 2009 and reimbursement of operating costs to the
advisor related to the services performed on our behalf.
Interest
expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 increased to $1.1 million from
$1,000 for the comparable period of 2008 due to financing of three real estate
acquisitions in 2009.
Interest
and other income is comparable for year ended December 31, 2009 and
2008.
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Net
operating income, as defined (1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Senior
living operations
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Triple-net
leased properties
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
Total
portfolio net operating income
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Reconciliation
to net loss:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
operating income, as defined (1)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Unallocated
(expenses) income:
|
||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(875,000
|
)
|
(209,000
|
)
|
666,000
|
318.7
|
||||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate acquisitions costs
|
(358,000
|
)
|
-
|
358,000
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
7,000
|
6,000
|
(1,000
|
)
|
16.7
|
|||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(3,000
|
)
|
2,000
|
66.7
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
$
|
(206,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,021,000
|
495.6
|
(1) Net operating income is defined as
total revenue less property operating and maintenance
expenses.
Senior Living
Operations
Net
operating income for senior living operations is defined as total revenue less
property operating and maintenance expenses. Total revenue includes rental
revenue and resident fees and service income. Property operating and maintenance
includes expenses such as labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and
other property operating costs. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, we did not own any properties, and accordingly, had no net operating
income.
3
Triple-Net Leased
Properties
Net
operating income for triple-net leased properties is defined as total revenue
less property operating and maintenance expenses. Total revenue includes rental
revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. Property operating and
maintenance includes expenses such as insurance and property taxes that tenants
are required to pay on our behalf. During the twelve months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, we did not own any properties, and accordingly, had no net
operating income.
Unallocated
(expenses)income
General
and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased to
$0.9 million from $0.2 million for the 2007 year. The increase is due to higher
professional, legal and accounting fees and increased expense reimbursements to
our Advisor associated with the commencement of our operations. Real estate
acquisition costs for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased to $0.4 million
from $0 for the 2007 year. The increase is due to acquisition fees paid to our
Advisor, based on proceeds from our public offering raised in 2008. We did not
raise any offering proceeds in our public offerings during 2007.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
We expect
that primary sources of capital over the long term will include net proceeds
from the sale of our common stock and net cash flows from operations. We expect
that our primary uses of capital will be for property acquisitions, for the
payment of tenant improvements, for the payment of operating expenses, including
interest expense on any outstanding indebtedness, reducing outstanding
indebtedness and for the payment of distributions.
As of
December 31, 2009, we had approximately $14.9 million in cash and cash
equivalents on hand. Our liquidity will increase as additional subscriptions for
shares are accepted in our initial public offering and decrease as net offering
proceeds are expended in connection with the acquisition, operation of
properties and distributions made in excess of cash available from operating
cash flows.
As of
December 31, 2009, our Advisor had incurred approximately $3.3 million in
organization and offering expenses, including approximately $0.1 million of
organizational costs that has been expensed. Of this amount, we have reimbursed
$1.9 million to our Advisor. Our Advisor has advanced us money for these
organization and offering expenses or pays these expenses on our behalf. Our
Advisor does not charge us interest on these advances. At times during our
offering stage, before the maximum amount of gross proceeds has been raised, the
amount of organization and offering expenses that we incur, or that our advisor
and its affiliates incur on our behalf, may exceed 3.5% of the gross offering
proceeds then raised. However, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the
extent that our organization and offering expenses exceed 3.5% of aggregate
gross offering proceeds at the conclusion of our offering. Our Advisor will pay
all of our organization and offering expenses described above that are in excess
of this 3.5% limitation. At December 31, 2009, organization and offering costs
reimbursed to our Advisor are approximately 3.8% of the gross proceeds of our
primary offering. In addition, our Advisor will pay all of our organization and
offering expenses that, when combined with the sales commissions and dealer
manager fees that we incur exceed 13.5% of the gross proceeds from our initial
public offering.
We will
not rely on advances from our Advisor to acquire properties but our Advisor and
its affiliates may loan funds to special purposes entities that may acquire
properties on our behalf pending our raising sufficient proceeds from our
initial public offering to purchase the properties from the special purpose
entity.
As of
December 31, 2009, a total of approximately 4.9 million shares of our common
stock had been sold in our initial public offering for aggregate gross proceeds
of approximately $49.1 million.
We intend
to own our core plus properties with low to moderate levels of debt financing.
We will incur moderate to high levels of indebtedness when acquiring our
value-added and opportunistic properties and possibly other real estate
investments. The debt levels on core plus properties during the offering period
may exceed the long-term target range of debt percentages on these types of
properties. However, we intend to reduce the percentage to fall within the 40%
to 50% range no later than the end of our offering stage. To the extent
sufficient proceeds from our public offering, debt financing, or a combination
of the two are unavailable to repay acquisition debt financing down to the
target ranges within a reasonable time as determined by our board of directors,
we will endeavor to raise additional equity or sell properties to repay such
debt so that we will own our properties with low to moderate levels of permanent
financing. In the event that our public offering is not fully sold, our ability
to diversify our investments may be diminished.
There may
be a delay between the sale of our shares and the purchase of properties. During
this period, our public offering net offering proceeds will be temporarily
invested in short-term, liquid investments that could yield lower returns than
investments in real estate.
Until
proceeds from our public offering are invested and generating operating cash
flow sufficient to fully fund distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay a
portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offering or from
borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009, distributions to stockholders were paid from proceeds of our
offering in anticipation of future cash flow.
4
Potential
future sources of capital include proceeds from future equity offerings,
proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders,
proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from
operations.
Financial
markets have recently experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. Liquidity
has tightened in all financial markets, including the debt and equity markets.
Our ability to fund property acquisitions or development projects, as well as
our ability to repay or refinance debt maturities could be adversely affected by
an inability to secure financing at reasonable terms, if at all.
Election
as a REIT
For
federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code) beginning with our taxable year ending December 31, 2008. Under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, we are not subject to federal income tax on
income that we distribute to our stockholders. REITs are subject to numerous
organizational and operational requirements in order to avoid taxation as a
regular corporation, including a requirement that they generally distribute at
least 90% of their annual taxable income to their stockholders. If we fail to
qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year, our income will be taxed at regular
corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT
for the four-year period following our failure to qualify. Our failure to
qualify as a REIT could result in us having a significant liability for
taxes.
REIT
status imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties.
Generally, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly operate assisted-living
facilities. However, such facilities may generally be operated by a taxable REIT
subsidiary (“TRS”) pursuant to a lease with the REIT. Therefore, we have formed
Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CGI Healthcare
Operating Partnership, LP, to lease any assisted-living properties we acquire
and to operate the assisted-living properties pursuant to contracts with
unaffiliated management companies. Master TRS and the REIT have made the
applicable election for Master TRS to qualify as a TRS. Under the management
contracts, the management companies will have direct control of the daily
operations of these assisted-living properties.
Other
Liquidity Needs
Property
Acquisitions
We expect
to purchase properties and have expenditures for capital improvements and tenant
improvements in the next twelve months; however, those amounts cannot be
estimated at this time. We cannot be certain however, that we will have
sufficient funds to make any acquisitions or related capital
expenditures.
Debt
Service Requirements
On
December 16, 2009 we entered into $10.0 million first mortgage loan secured by
our interest in the Caruth Haven Court property. The loan has a 10-year term,
maturing on December 16, 2019. The effective interest rate on the loan is fixed
at 6.43% per annum, with fixed monthly payments of approximately $63,000 based
on a 30-year amortization schedule. If we prepay the loan prior to June 16, 2019
we would be required to pay a variable yield maintenance prepayment fee. The new
loan is secured by a deed of trust on Caruth Haven Court, and by an assignment
of the leases and rents payable to the borrower.
On May 1,
2009, in connection with the acquisition of The Oaks Bradenton, we borrowed a
total of $2.76 million pursuant to two loan agreements. Of the total loan
amount, $2.4 million matures on May 1, 2014 with no option to extend and bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% per annum. The remaining $360,000 matures on
May 1, 2014 and bears interest at a variable rate equivalent to prevailing
market certificate deposits rate plus a 1.5% margin. We may repay the loan, in
whole or in part, on or before May 1, 2014, subject to prepayment premiums.
Monthly payments for the first twelve months will be interest only. Monthly
payments beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal
based on a 25-year amortization period.
On
December 31, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of the Mesa Vista Inn
Health Center, we entered into an assumption and amendment of an existing
mortgage loan. Pursuant to the assumption agreement, we assumed the outstanding
principal balance of $7.5 million. The loan matures on January 5, 2015 and bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum with fixed monthly payments of
approximately $56,000 based on a 20 year amortization schedule.
5
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table reflects our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009,
specifically our obligations under long-term debt agreements and purchase
obligations:
Payment due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes
Payable (1)
|
$ | 20,260,000 | $ | 288,000 | $ | 725,000 | $ | 3,373,000 | $ | 15,874,000 | ||||||||||
Interest
Expense related to long term debt (2)
|
$ | 9,116,000 | $ | 1,211,000 | $ | 2,539,000 | $ | 2,335,000 | $ | 3,031,000 | ||||||||||
Payable
to related parties (3)
|
$ | 1,629,000 | $ | 1,629,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
(1) These
obligations represent four loans outstanding as of December 31, 2009: (1) a
$10.0 million first mortgage loan related to Caruth Haven Court (2) a $2.4
million mortgage loan related to The Oaks Bradenton (3) a $0.36 million loan
related to The Oaks Bradenton and (4) a $7.5 million mortgage loan related to
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center.
(2)
Interest expense related to the $10.0 million first mortgage loan bears a fixed
rate of 6.43% per annum calculated based on an actual over 360 schedule
multiplied by the loan balances outstanding. Interest expense related to $2.4
million mortgage loan agreement bears a fixed rate of 6.25% per annum. Monthly
payments for the first twelve months are interest-only. Monthly payments
beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal based on a
25-year amortization period. Interest expense for the $0.36 million loan is
calculated based on a variable interest rate equivalent to prevailing market
certificate deposits rate of 1.45% at December 31, 2009 plus margin of 1.5%.
Interest expense for the $7.5 million mortgage loan is calculated based on a
fixed rate of 6.50% per annum.
(3)
Payable to related parties consists of offering costs, acquisition fees, expense
reimbursement payable, sales commissions and dealer manager fees to our Advisor
and PCC.
6
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
There are
no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations (including
contingent obligations) that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current
or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in the financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources.
Inflation
Although
the real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the
recent past due to the relatively low inflation rate, we expect that the
majority of our tenant leases will include provisions that would protect us to
some extent from the impact of inflation. Where possible, our leases will
include provisions for rent escalations and partial reimbursement to us of
expenses. Our ability to include provisions in the leases that protect us
against inflation is subject to competitive conditions that vary from market to
market.
Subsequent
Events
Property
Acquisition and Related Financing
On
January 12, 2010, through a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, the Company
contributed into an investment in a joint venture along with Cornerstone Private
Equity Fund Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Cornerstone Co-Investor”), an
affiliate of the Company’s advisor that is also advised by Cornerstone Leveraged
Realty Advisors, LLC, and affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated
entity, to develop a $16.3 million long-term acute care medical facility on the
campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia.
We
invested approximately $2.7 million to acquire an 83.3% equity interest in
Cornerstone Rome LTH Partners LLC (the “Cornerstone JV Entity”) through a
wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The Cornerstone
Co-Investor invested approximately $532,000 to acquire the remaining 16.7%
interest in the Cornerstone JV Entity. The aggregate budgeted development cost
for the proposed development of the long-term acute care medical facility is
approximately $16.3 million. The Cornerstone JV Entity contributed approximately
$3.2 million of capital to acquire a 90% limited partnership interest in Rome
LTH Partners, LP (the “Rome Joint Venture”). The development cost will be funded
with approximately $3.54 million of initial capital from the Rome Joint Venture
and a $12.75 million construction loan. We expect to fund our portion of any
future required capital contributions using proceeds raised in our ongoing
public offering.
7
In
connection with this development, the Rome Joint Venture entered into a $12.75
million construction loan. The loan will mature on December 18, 2012, with two
1-year extension options dependent on certain financial covenants. The loan
bears a variable interest rate with a spread of 300 basis points over 1-month
LIBOR with a floor of 6.15%. Monthly payments for the first twelve months will
be interest-only. Monthly payments beginning the thirteenth month will include
interest and principal based on a 25-year amortization period.
Sale
of Shares of Common Stock
As of
March 12, 2010, we had raised approximately $58.4 million through the issuance
of approximately 5.9 million shares of our common stock under our Offering,
excluding, approximately 132,000 shares that were issued pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan reduced by approximately 28,000 shares pursuant
to our stock repurchase program.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. We believe that our critical accounting policies are those that
require significant judgments and estimates such as those related to fair value,
real estate purchase price allocation, evaluation of possible impairment of real
property assets, revenue recognition and valuation of receivables, income taxes,
and uncertain tax positions. These estimates are made and evaluated on an
on-going basis using information that is currently available as well as various
other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could vary from those estimates, perhaps in material adverse ways, and
those estimates could be different under different assumptions or
conditions.
Investments
in Real Estate
Upon
acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property based
upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land,
buildings, site improvements, furniture fixtures and equipment and intangible
lease assets or liabilities including in-place leases, above market and below
market leases, tenant relationships and goodwill. We allocated the purchase
price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by
valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value of the building is
depreciated over an estimated useful life of 39 years.
Tenant
relationships and in-place lease values are calculated based on management’s
evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our
overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of tenant
relationships and in-place lease intangibles, which are included as a component
of investments in real estate, is amortized to expense over the average expected
lease term.
Acquired
above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the
difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the
remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is
amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an
adjustment to rental revenue on our consolidated statements of
operations.
Goodwill
represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of identifiable
net assets of the business acquired.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
On
January 1, 2008, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standard Codification (“ASC”) 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair
value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies prospectively to all other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The ASC
825-10, Financial
Instruments, requires the disclosure
of fair value information about financial instruments whether or not recognized
on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that
value.
We
generally determine or calculate the fair value of financial instruments using
quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or
using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as
discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate
information for similar types of instruments and our estimates for
non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected
by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and
estimates of future cash flow.
8
Our
consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash
and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, deferred costs and other
assets payable to related parties, prepaid rent, security deposits, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, restricted cash and notes payable. We consider
the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant and
other receivables, deferred costs and other assets, payable to related parties,
prepaid rent, security deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to
approximate fair value for these financial instruments because of the short
period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected
payment.
The fair
value of notes payable is estimated using lending rates available to us for
financial instruments with similar terms and maturities and had been calculated
to approximate the carrying value at December 31, 2009.
Impairment
of Real Estate Assets and Goodwill
Real
Estate Assets
Rental
properties, properties undergoing development and redevelopment, land held for
development and intangibles are individually evaluated for impairment in
accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant &
Equipment, when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable
that the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the
carrying amount. Impairment indicators for our rental properties, properties
undergoing development and redevelopment, and land held for development is
assessed by project and include, but is not limited to, significant fluctuations
in estimated net operating income, occupancy changes, construction costs,
estimated completion dates, rental rates and other market factors. We assess the
expected undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not
limited to, appropriate capitalization rates, construction costs, available
market information, historical operating results, known trends and
market/economic conditions that may affect the property and our assumptions
about the use of the asset, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted
approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration. Upon determination that
impairment has occurred and that the future undiscounted cash flows are less
than the carrying amount, a write-down will be recorded to reduce the carrying
amount to its estimated fair value.
Goodwill
Goodwill
and intangibles with infinite lives must be tested for impairment annually or
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related
asset might be impaired. Management uses all available information to make these
fair value determinations, including the present values of expected future cash
flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
Impairment testing entails estimating future net cash flows relating to the
asset, based on management's estimate of market conditions including market
capitalization rate, future rental revenue, future operating expenses and future
occupancy percentages. Determining the fair value of goodwill involves
management judgment and is ultimately based on management's assessment of the
value of the assets and, to the extent available, third party assessments. We
perform our annual impairment test as of December 31 of each year. We completed
the required annual impairment test and no impairment was recognized and none of
our reporting units are at risk based on the results of the annual goodwill
impairment test.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is recorded in accordance with ASC 840-10, Leases, and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, as amended” (“SAB 104”). Revenue is recognized when four
basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of
service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability.
Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a
straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability
assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is
generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the
period. Because our leases may provide for free rent, lease incentives, or other
rental increases at specified intervals, we straight-line the recognition of
revenue, which results in the recording of a receivable for rent not yet due
under the lease terms. Our revenues are comprised largely of rental income and
other income collected from tenants.
Consolidation
Considerations for Our Investments in Joint Ventures
ASC
810-10, Consolidation,
which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a
controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and
accordingly should consolidate the entity. Before concluding that it is
appropriate to apply the voting interest consolidation model to an entity, an
enterprise must first determine that the entity is not a variable interest
entity. We evaluate, as appropriate, our interests, if any, in joint ventures
and other arrangements to determine if consolidation is
appropriate.
9
Income
Taxes
For
federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ending
December 31, 2008. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and
operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at
least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we
generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we
distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at
regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during
which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief
under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely
affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders.
However, we believe that we will be organized and operate in such a manner as to
qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future
in such a manner so that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes. Although we had net operating loss carryovers from years prior to
our electing REIT status for the current year, the deferred tax asset associated
with such net operating loss carryovers may not be utilized by us as a REIT. As
a result, a valuation allowance for 100% of the deferred tax asset generated has
been recorded as of December 31, 2009.
We have
formed Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), and Master TRS has made the applicable
election to be subject to state and federal income tax as a C corporation. The
operating results from Master TRS are included in the consolidated results of
operations. With respect to Master TRS, we account for income taxes under the
asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the
financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which the difference are expected to reverse.
The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
We record
net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely
than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available
positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies
and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would
be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of
their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation
allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
A net
operating loss in the amount of approximately $293,000 was generated by Master
TRS as of December 31, 2009. Since the realization of the benefit of this net
operating loss cannot be reasonably assured, we have provided a valuation
allowance in the full amount of the deferred tax asset associated with such
loss. If our assumptions change and we determine we will be able to realize the
tax benefit relating to such loss, the tax benefit associated with such loss
will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense at such time. We have no
deferred tax liabilities.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Reference
is made to Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which begin on page
F-1 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See
the following Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
10
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Equity (Deficit)
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-6
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
Schedule
II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
F-24
|
Schedule
III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
|
F-25
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cornerstone
Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cornerstone Healthcare
Plus REIT, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity (deficit)
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009. Our audit also included the financial statement schedules listed in the
index. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
As
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1,
2009, the Company adopted a new accounting provision with respect to
noncontrolling interests and retrospectively adjusted all periods presented in
the financial statements.
Also, as
discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the disclosures
in the accompanying 2009, 2008 and 2007 consolidated financial statements have
been retrospectively adjusted for a change in the composition of reportable
segments.
/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa
Mesa, California
March 17,
2010
(November
29, 2010 as to Note 13)
F-2
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December
31, 2009 and 2008
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
14,900,000
|
$
|
7,449,000
|
||||
Investments
in real estate
|
||||||||
Land
|
7,370,000
|
—
|
||||||
Buildings
and improvements, net
|
30,640,000
|
—
|
||||||
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment, net
|
1,009,000
|
—
|
||||||
Intangible
lease assets, net
|
1,869,000
|
—
|
||||||
40,888,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Deferred
financing costs, net
|
228,000
|
41,000
|
||||||
Tenant
and other receivable
|
481,000
|
10,000
|
||||||
Deferred
costs and other assets
|
338,000
|
472,000
|
||||||
Restricted
cash
|
364,000
|
—
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
1,141,000
|
—
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
58,340,000
|
$
|
7,972,000
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$
|
20,260,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
932,000
|
64,000
|
||||||
Payable
to related parties
|
1,734,000
|
2,478,000
|
||||||
Prepaid
rent and security deposits
|
911,000
|
—
|
||||||
Distributions
payable
|
305,000
|
61,000
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
24,142,000
|
2,603,000
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 9)
|
||||||||
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares were
issued or outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 580,000,000 shares authorized; 4,993,751 shares
and 1,058,252 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
50,000
|
11,000
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
39,551,000
|
6,597,000
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(5,403,000
|
)
|
(1,239,000
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
34,198,000
|
5,369,000
|
||||||
Noncontrolling
interests
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total
equity
|
34,198,000
|
5,369,000
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
58,340,000
|
$
|
7,972,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$
|
4,964,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Tenant
reimbursements and other income
|
1,697,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
6,661,000
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Property
operating and maintenance
|
5,172,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,206,000
|
875,000
|
209,000
|
|||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
211,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Real
estate acquisition costs
|
1,814,000
|
358,000
|
—
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,367,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
9,770,000
|
1,233,000
|
209,000
|
||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(3,109,000
|
)
|
(1,233,000
|
)
|
(209,000
|
)
|
||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||
Interest
and other income
|
13,000
|
7,000
|
6,000
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,053,000
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(3,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
(4,149,000
|
)
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
(206,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
15,000
|
(121,000
|
)
|
(73,000
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(4,164,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,106,000
|
)
|
$
|
(133,000
|
)
|
|||
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common
stockholders
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
$
|
(12.90
|
)
|
$
|
(1,330.00
|
)
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common shares
|
1,999,747
|
85,743
|
100
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Common Stock
Par Value
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
Total
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
- December 31,
2006
|
100
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,000
|
$
|
200,000
|
$
|
201,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(133,000
|
)
|
(133,000
|
)
|
(73,000
|
)
|
(206,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance
– December 31, 2007
|
100
|
—
|
1,000
|
(133,000
|
)
|
(132,000
|
)
|
127,000
|
(5,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
1,058,152
|
11,000
|
10,568,000
|
—
|
10,579,000
|
—
|
10,579,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemed
shares
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Offering
costs
|
—
|
—
|
(3,787,000
|
)
|
—
|
(3,787,000
|
)
|
—
|
(3,787,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Distributions
|
—
|
—
|
(185,000
|
)
|
—
|
(185,000
|
)
|
(6,000
|
)
|
(191,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,106,000
|
)
|
(1,106,000
|
)
|
(121,000
|
)
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance
– December 31, 2008
|
1,058,252
|
11,000
|
6,597,000
|
(1,239,000
|
)
|
5,369,000
|
—
|
5,369,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
3,953,744
|
39,000
|
39,451,000
|
—
|
39,490,000
|
—
|
39,490,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemed
shares
|
(18,245
|
)
|
—
|
(182,000
|
)
|
—
|
(182,000
|
)
|
—
|
(182,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Offering
costs
|
—
|
—
|
(4,352,000
|
)
|
—
|
(4,352,000
|
)
|
—
|
(4,352,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Distributions
|
—
|
—
|
(1,963,000
|
)
|
—
|
(1,963,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
(1,978,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(4,164,000
|
)
|
(4,164,000
|
)
|
15,000
|
(4,149,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
– December 31, 2009
|
4,993,751
|
$
|
50,000
|
$
|
39,551,000
|
$
|
(5,403,000
|
)
|
$
|
34,198,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
34,198,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
$
|
(206,000
|
)
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
111,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,367,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Provision
for bad debt
|
11,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Tenant
and other receivables
|
(492,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Deferred
costs and deposits
|
(127,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(14,000
|
)
|
(24,000
|
)
|
(73,000
|
)
|
||||||
Prepaid
rent and tenant security deposits
|
78,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Payable
to related parties
|
239,000
|
32,000
|
48,000
|
|||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
53,000
|
(51,000
|
)
|
115,000
|
||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(2,923,000
|
)
|
(1,270,000
|
)
|
(116,000
|
)
|
||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate acquisitions
|
(34,278,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Additions
to real estate
|
(91,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Restricted
cash
|
(364,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Acquisition
deposits
|
385,000
|
(385,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(34,348,000
|
)
|
(385,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
38,621,000
|
10,516,000
|
—
|
|||||||||
Redeemed
shares
|
(182,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from note payable to related party
|
14,000,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Repayment
of note payable to related party
|
(14,000,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
12,760,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Offering
costs
|
(5,283,000
|
)
|
(1,389,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
(339,000
|
)
|
(41,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Distributions
paid
|
(840,000
|
)
|
(61,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Distributions
paid to noncontrolling interest
|
(15,000
|
)
|
(6,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
44,722,000
|
9,019,000
|
—
|
|||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,451,000
|
7,364,000
|
(116,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of period
|
7,449,000
|
85,000
|
201,000
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents - end of period
|
$
|
14,900,000
|
$
|
7,449,000
|
$
|
85,000
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
941,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Distributions
declared not paid
|
$
|
305,000
|
$
|
61,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Distributions
reinvested
|
$
|
879,000
|
$
|
63,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Offering
costs payable to related parties
|
$
|
82,000
|
$
|
2,398,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Accrued
real estate addition
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Note
payable assumed at property acquisition
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Assets
acquired at property acquisition
|
$
|
71,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Liabilities
assumed at property acquisition
|
$
|
1,594,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
1. Organization
Cornerstone
Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. (formerly known as Cornerstone Growth & Income
REIT, Inc.), a Maryland corporation, was formed on October 16, 2006 under the
General Corporation Law of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the business
of investing in and owning commercial real estate. As used in this report, the
“Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where context otherwise requires. We
are newly formed and are subject to the general risks associated with a start-up
enterprise, including the risk of business failure. Subject to certain
restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by an affiliate,
Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
that was formed on October 16, 2006 (the “Advisor”), pursuant to an advisory
agreement.
Cornerstone
Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
“Operating Partnership”) was formed on October 17, 2006. At December 31, 2009,
we owned approximately a 99.6% general partner interest in the Operating
Partnership while the Advisor owned approximately a 0.4% limited partnership
interest. In addition, the Advisor owned approximately a 0.9% limited
partnership interest in CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P., a subsidiary
of the Operating Partnership. We anticipate that we will conduct all or a
portion of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Our financial
statements and the financial statements of the Operating Partnership are
consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
For
federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust, (“REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) beginning with our taxable year
ending December 31, 2008. REIT status imposes limitations related to operating
assisted-living properties. Generally, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly
operate assisted-living facilities. However, such facilities may generally be
operated by a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) pursuant to a lease with the REIT.
Therefore, we have formed Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), a wholly owned
subsidiary of CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, LP, to lease any
assisted-living properties we acquire and to operate the assisted-living
properties pursuant to contracts with unaffiliated management companies. Master
TRS and the REIT have made the applicable election for Master TRS to qualify as
a TRS. Under the management contracts, the management companies will have direct
control of the daily operations of these assisted-living
properties.
2. Public Offering
On
November 14, 2006, Terry G. Roussel, our President and CEO, purchased 100 shares
of common stock for $1,000 and became our initial stockholder. Our articles of
incorporation authorize 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of
$0.01 and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. We are
offering a maximum of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, consisting of
40,000,000 shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and 10,000,000
shares for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan (collectively,
the “Offering”).
On June
20, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") declared our
amended registration statement (SEC Registration No. 333-139704) effective, and
we began accepting subscriptions for shares under our Primary
Offering.
As of
December 31, 2009, we had sold a total of approximately 4.9 million shares of
our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $49.1 million. We
intend to use the net proceeds of the Offering to invest in real estate
including healthcare, multi-tenant industrial, net-leased retail properties and
other real estate investments where we believe there are opportunities to
enhance cash flow and value. Effective as of January 8, 2010, we amended our
charter to change our name from “Cornerstone Growth & Income REIT, Inc.” to
“Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.”
F-7
We
retained Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. (“PCC”), an affiliate of the Advisor,
to serve as our dealer manager for the Offering. PCC is responsible for
marketing our shares being offered pursuant to the Offering. PCC and Terry G.
Roussel, the majority owner of our dealer manager and one of our officers and
directors, has been the subject of a non-public inquiry by FINRA focused on
private placements conducted by our dealer manager during the period from
January 1, 2004 through May 30, 2009. We are not the issuer of any of the
securities offered in the private placements that are the subject of FINRA’s
investigation. One such issuer is, however, the managing member of our Advisor.
Without admitting or denying the findings, our dealer manager and Terry Roussel
have settled the FINRA inquiry, which alleged that they violated NASD rules
relating to communications with the public (Rule 2210); supervision (Rule 3010)
and standards of commercial honor and principles of trade (Rule 2110). FINRA’s
allegations, in sum, focus on claimed material misstatements and omissions with
respect to certain performance targets. Our dealer manager consented to a
censure and fine of $700,000. Mr. Roussel consented to a fine of $50,000,
suspension from association with a FINRA member in all capacities for 20
business days, and suspension from association with a FINRA member firm in a
principal capacity for an additional three months. Terry Roussel served as our
dealer manager’s president and chief compliance officer until October 1, 2009,
when he resigned as president. In January 2010, Terry Roussel transferred his
chief compliance officer responsibilities to a qualified registered principal.
He presently serves as one of our dealer manager’s two directors. Our dealer
manager has also provided additional disclosures, satisfactory to FINRA, to
investors in the private offerings.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
The
summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist
in understanding our consolidated financial statements. Such financial
statements and accompanying notes are the representations of our management, who
is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies
conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied
in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We
consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible
to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be
cash equivalents. Cash is generally invested in government backed securities and
investment-grade short-term instruments and the amount of credit exposure to any
one commercial issuer is limited.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted
cash represents cash held in an interest bearing certificate of deposit account
as required under the terms of a mortgage loan.
Real
Estate Purchase Price Allocation
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued
Accounting Standard Codification (the “ASC”) ASC 805-10, Business Combinations. In
summary, ASC 805-10 requires the acquirer of a business combination to measure
at fair value the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, with limited
exceptions. In addition, this standard requires acquisition costs to be expensed
as incurred. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008, and is to be applied prospectively, with no earlier adoption
permitted. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2009 and have expensed
acquisition costs accordingly.
We
allocate the purchase price of our properties in accordance with ASC 805-10.
Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property
based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of
land, buildings, site improvements, furniture fixtures and equipment and
intangible lease assets or liabilities including in-place leases, above market
and below market leases, tenant relationships and goodwill. We allocated the
purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property
by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value of the building is
depreciated over an estimated useful life of 39 years.
Tenant
relationships and in-place lease values are calculated based on management’s
evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our
overall relationship with the respective tenant. The value of tenant
relationships and in-place lease intangibles, which are included as a component
of investments in real estate, is amortized to expense over the weighted average
expected lease term.
Acquired
above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the
difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the
remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is
amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an
adjustment to rental revenue on our consolidated statements of
operations.
Goodwill
represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of identifiable
net assets of the business acquired.
F-8
Amortization
associated with the intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 were $0.9 million, $0 and $0, respectively.
Anticipated
amortization for each of the five following years ended December 31 is as
follows:
Intangible assets
|
||||
2010
|
$
|
1,255,000
|
||
2011
|
$
|
531,000
|
||
2012
|
$
|
83,000
|
||
2013
|
$
|
—
|
||
2014
|
$
|
—
|
The
estimated useful lives for intangible assets range from approximately one to 2.5
years. As of December 31, 2009, the weighted-average amortization period for
intangible assets was 2.1 years.
As of
December 31, 2009, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to
real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows:
Buildings and
Improvements
|
Site
Improvements
|
Furniture,
Fixtures &
Vehicles
|
Identified
Intangible
Assets
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
$
|
30,630,000
|
$
|
415,000
|
$
|
1,076,000
|
$
|
2,764,000
|
||||||||
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
(394,000
|
)
|
(11,000
|
)
|
(67,000
|
)
|
(895,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
|
$
|
30,236,000
|
$
|
404,000
|
$
|
1,009,000
|
$
|
1,869,000
|
Depreciation
expense associated with buildings and improvements, site improvements and
furniture and fixtures for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately
$472,000.
As of
December 31, 2008, no cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related
to real estate assets and related lease intangibles was recorded.
Impairment
of Real Estate Assets and Goodwill
Real
Estate Assets
Rental
properties, properties undergoing development and redevelopment, land held for
development and intangibles are individually evaluated for impairment in
accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant &
Equipment, when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable
that the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the
carrying amount. Impairment indicators for our rental properties, properties
undergoing development and redevelopment, and land held for development is
assessed by project and include, but is not limited to, significant fluctuations
in estimated net operating income, occupancy changes, construction costs,
estimated completion dates, rental rates and other market factors. We assess the
expected undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not
limited to, appropriate capitalization rates, construction costs, available
market information, historical operating results, known trends and
market/economic conditions that may affect the property and our assumptions
about the use of the asset, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted
approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration. Upon determination that
impairment has occurred and that the future undiscounted cash flows are less
than the carrying amount, a write-down will be recorded to reduce the carrying
amount to its estimated fair value.
Goodwill
Goodwill
and intangibles with infinite lives must be tested for impairment annually or
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related
asset might be impaired. Management uses all available information to make these
fair value determinations, including the present values of expected future cash
flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets.
Impairment testing entails estimating future net cash flows relating to the
asset, based on management's estimate of market conditions including market
capitalization rate, future rental revenue, future operating expenses and future
occupancy percentages. Determining the fair value of goodwill involves
management judgment and is ultimately based on management's assessment of the
value of the assets and, to the extent available, third party assessments. We
perform our annual impairment test as of December 31 of each year. We completed
the required annual impairment test and none of our reporting units are at risk
and no impairment was recognized based on the results of the annual goodwill
impairment test.
F-9
Income
Taxes
For
federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ending
December 31, 2008. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and
operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at
least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we
generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we
distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at
regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during
which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief
under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely
affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders.
However, we believe that we will be organized and operate in such a manner as to
qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future
in such a manner so that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes. Although we had net operating loss carryovers from years prior to
our election as a REIT the deferred tax asset associated with such net operating
loss carryovers may not be utilized by us as a REIT. As a result, a valuation
allowance for 100% of the deferred tax asset generated has been recorded as of
December 31, 2009.
We have
formed Master TRS, and Master TRS has made the applicable election to be subject
to state and federal income tax as a C corporation. The operating results from
Master TRS are included in the consolidated results of operations. With respect
to Master TRS, we account for income taxes under the asset and liability method,
which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax
basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which the difference are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax
rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date.
We record
net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely
than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available
positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies
and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would
be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of
their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation
allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
A net
operating loss in the amount of approximately $293,000 was generated by Master
TRS as of December 31, 2009. Since the realization of the benefit of this net
operating loss cannot be reasonably assured, we have provided a valuation
allowance in the full amount of the deferred tax asset associated with such
loss. If our assumptions change and we determine we will be able to realize the
tax benefit relating to such loss, the tax benefit associated with such loss
will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense at such time. We have no
deferred tax liabilities.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
In
accordance with the requirements of ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, favorable tax
positions are included in the calculation of tax liabilities if it is more
likely than not that the Company’s adopted tax position will prevail if
challenged by tax authorities. As a result of our REIT status, we are able to
claim a dividends-paid deduction on our tax return to deduct the full amount of
common dividends paid to stockholders when computing our annual taxable income,
which results in our taxable income being passed through to our stockholders. A
REIT is subject to a 100% tax on the net income from prohibited transactions. A
“prohibited transaction” is the sale or other disposition of property held
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.
There is a safe harbor which, if met, expressly prevents the IRS from asserting
the prohibited transaction test. We have not had any sales of properties to
date. We have no income tax expense, deferred tax assets or deferred tax
liabilities associated with any such uncertain tax positions for the operations
of any entity included in the consolidated results of
operations.
F-10
Tenant
and Other Receivables
Tenant
and other receivables are comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due
from tenants. Tenant receivables are recorded at the original amount earned,
less an allowance for any doubtful accounts. Management assesses the
realizability of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provides for
allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. For the
year ended December 31, 2009 provisions for bad debts amounted to approximately
$11,000 which is included in property operating and maintenance expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No bad debt expense was
recorded during the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2007.
Deferred
Costs and Other Assets
Other
assets consist primarily of prepaid expenses, real estate deposits and utility
deposits.
Deferred
Financing Costs
Costs
incurred in connection with debt financing are recorded as deferred financing
costs. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight-line basis
which approximates the effective interest rate method, over the contractual
terms of the respective financings.
Consolidation
Considerations for Our Investments in Joint Ventures
ASC
810-10, Consolidation,
which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a
controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and
accordingly should consolidate the entity. Before concluding that it is
appropriate to apply the voting interest consolidation model to an entity, an
enterprise must first determine that the entity is not a variable interest
entity. We evaluate, as appropriate, our interests, if any, in joint ventures
and other arrangements to determine if consolidation is
appropriate.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is recorded in accordance with ASC 840-10, Leases, and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, as amended” (“SAB 104”). Revenue is recognized when four
basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of
service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability.
Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a
straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability
assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is
generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the
period. Because our leases may provide for free rent, lease incentives, or other
rental increases at specified intervals, we straight-line the recognition of
revenue, which results in the recording of a receivable for rent not yet due
under the lease terms. Our revenues are comprised largely of rental income and
other income collected from tenants.
Future
Minimum Lease Payments
Our
leases are on a month to month basis except for the net lease held with the
single tenant. The future minimum lease payments to be received under the single
tenant as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Years ending December 31,
|
||||
2010
|
$
|
1,495,000
|
||
2011
|
1,532,000
|
|||
2012
|
1,571,000
|
|||
2013
|
1,610,000
|
|||
2014
|
1,650,000
|
|||
2015
and thereafter
|
$
|
30,331,000
|
Organizational
and Offering Costs
The
Advisor funds organization and offering costs on our behalf. We are required to
reimburse the Advisor for such organization and offering costs up to 3.5% of the
cumulative capital raised in the Primary Offering. Organization and offering
costs include items such as legal and accounting fees, marketing, due diligence,
promotional and printing costs and amounts to reimburse our Advisor for all
costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of the
Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our
shares. All offering costs are recorded as an offset to additional paid-in
capital, and all organization costs are recorded as an expense at the time we
become liable for the payment of these amounts. At times during our offering
stage, the amount of organization and offering expenses that we incur, or that
the Advisor and its affiliates incur on our behalf, may exceed 3.5% of the gross
offering proceeds then raised, but the Advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the
extent that our organization and offering expenses exceed 3.5% of aggregate
gross offering proceeds at the conclusion of the Offering. In addition, the
Advisor will also pay any organization and offering expenses to the extent that
such expenses, plus sales commissions and the dealer manager fee (but not the
acquisition fees or expenses) are in excess of 13.5% of gross offering
proceeds.
F-11
Noncontrolling
Interest in Consolidated Subsidiaries
Noncontrolling
interests relate to the interests in the consolidated entities that are not
wholly-owned by us.
On
January 1, 2009, we adopted ASC 810-10-65, Consolidation, which
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
consolidated financial statements. ASC 810-10-65 also requires consolidated net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest and requires disclosure, on the face
of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest.
ASC
810-10-65 was required to be applied prospectively after adoption, with the
exception of the presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied
retrospectively for all periods presented. As a result of the adoption of ASC
810-10-65, we reclassified noncontrolling interests to permanent equity in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. We
will periodically evaluate individual noncontrolling interests for the ability
to continue to recognize the noncontrolling interest as permanent equity in the
consolidated balance sheets. Any noncontrolling interest that fails to qualify
as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the
greater of (a) the carrying amount, or (b) its redemption value as of the end of
the period in which the determination is made.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit
risk are primarily cash investments; cash is generally invested in
investment-grade short-term instruments. Currently, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, generally insures amounts up to $250,000 per
depositor per insured bank. This amount is scheduled to be reduced to $100,000
after December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2009 we had cash accounts in excess
of FDIC insured limits.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
On
January 1, 2008, we adopted ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair
value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies prospectively to all other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
We
adopted ASC 820-10 with respect to our non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10 with respect to our
non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
The ASC
825-10, Financial
Instruments, requires the disclosure
of fair value information about financial instruments whether or not recognized
on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that
value.
We
generally determine or calculate the fair value of financial instruments using
quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or
using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as
discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate
information for similar types of instruments and our estimates for
non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected
by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and
estimates of future cash flow.
Our
consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash
and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, deferred costs and other
assets, payable to related parties, prepaid rent, security deposits, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, restricted cash and notes payable. We consider
the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant and
other receivables, deferred costs and other assets, payable to related parties,
prepaid rent, security deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to
approximate fair value for these financial instruments because of the short
period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected
payment.
The fair
value of notes payable is estimated using lending rates available to us for
financial instruments with similar terms and maturities and had been estimated
to approximate the carrying value at December 31, 2009.
F-12
Basic
and Diluted Net Loss per Common Share Attributable to Common
Stockholders
Basic and
diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders per share
is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholder by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. For the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, there were no potential dilutive
common shares.
Basic and
diluted net loss per share is calculated as follows:
Year Ended
December
31, 2009
|
Year Ended
December
31, 2008
|
Year Ended
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(4,164,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,106,000
|
)
|
$
|
(133,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss per common share attributable to common stockholders — basic and
diluted
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
$
|
(12.90
|
)
|
$
|
(1,330.00
|
)
|
|||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding — basic and diluted
|
1,999,747
|
85,743
|
100
|
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of the assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could
materially differ from those estimates.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
“Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized
by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All
guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The
Codification became effective for interim or annual financial periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued new accounting literature with respect to the
consolidation of VIEs. The new guidance impacts the consolidation guidance
applicable to VIEs and among other things require a qualitative rather than a
quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE, continuous
assessments of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and
enhanced disclosures about a company’s involvement with a VIE. The new guidance
applies to our fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2010 and early adoption is
prohibited. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standard Update to address
implementation issues associated with the accounting for decreases in the
ownership of a subsidiary. The new guidance clarified the scope of the entities
covered by the guidance related to accounting for decreases in the ownership of
a subsidiary and specifically excluded in-substance real estate or conveyances
of oil and gas mineral rights from the scope. Additionally, the new guidance
expands the disclosures required for a business combination achieved in stages
and deconsolidation of a business or nonprofit activity. The new guidance became
effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 31, 2009
and must be applied on a retrospective basis to the first period that an entity
adopted the new guidance related to noncontrolling interests. The adoption of
this new guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
4. Investments in Real
Estate
On
January 22, 2009, we purchased an existing assisted-living facility, Caruth
Haven Court, for a purchase price of approximately $20.5 million. The
acquisition was funded with net proceeds raised from our ongoing public offering
and a bridge loan obtained from Cornerstone Operating Partnership, L.P., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc., a publicly
offered, non-traded REIT sponsored by affiliates of our sponsor. We repaid the
bridge loan on December 16, 2009 with the proceeds from a $10.0 million loan
obtained from an unaffiliated entity and proceeds from our
offering.
F-13
On May 1,
2009, we purchased an existing assisted-living facility, Oaks Bradenton, for a
purchase price of $4.5 million. The acquisition was funded with net proceeds of
approximately $1.7 million raised from our ongoing public offering and financing
of $2.8 million.
On
December 30, 2009, we purchased an existing assisted-living facility, GreenTree
at Westwood, for a purchase price of approximately $5.2 million. The acquisition
was funded with net proceeds raised from our ongoing public offering. The
property was purchased with no debt financing; however, we may later elect to
place mortgage debt on the property.
On
December 31, 2009, we purchased a skilled nursing facility, Mesa Vista Inn
Health Center, for a purchase price of $13.0 million. The acquisition was funded
with net proceeds of approximately $5.5 million raised from our ongoing public
offering and the assumption of $7.5 million of debt financing under the existing
mortgage loan on the property.
Mesa
Vista Inn Health Center is leased to a single tenant, PM Management – Babcock
NC, LLC, which is an affiliate of Harden Healthcare Inc., on a long-term basis
under a net lease that transfers substantially all of the operating costs
obligations to the tenant.
5.
Payable to Related Parties
Payable
to related parties at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $1.7 million
and $2.5 million, respectively, which consists of offering costs, acquisition
fees, expense reimbursement payable, sales commissions and dealer manager fees
to our Advisor and PCC.
6. Equity
Common
Stock
Our
articles of incorporation authorize 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a
par value of $0.01 and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of
$0.01. As of December 31, 2009, we had cumulatively issued approximately 4.9
million shares of common stock for a total of approximately $49.1 million of
gross proceeds. As of December 31, 2008, we had cumulatively issued
approximately 1.1 million shares of common stock for a total of approximately
$10.5 million of gross proceeds. This excludes shares issued under the
distribution reinvestment plan.
Distribution
Reinvestment Plan
We have
adopted a distribution reinvestment plan that allows our stockholders to have
dividends and other distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in
additional shares of our common stock. We have registered 10,000,000 shares of
our common stock for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. The
purchase price per share is 95% of the price paid by the purchaser for our
common stock, but not less than $9.50 per share. As of December 31, 2009, we
have issued approximately 99,000 shares under the distribution reinvestment
plan. We may amend or terminate the distribution reinvestment plan for any
reason at any time upon 10 days prior written notice to
participants.
Stock
Repurchase Program
We have
adopted a share redemption program for investors who have held their shares for
at least one year, unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a
stockholder’s death. Under our current stock repurchase program, the repurchase
price will vary depending on the purchase price paid by the stockholder and the
number of years the shares were held. Our board of directors may amend, suspend
or terminate the program at any time upon thirty (30) days prior notice to our
stockholders.
During
the years ended 2008 and 2007, we did not redeem any shares pursuant to our
stock repurchase program. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we redeemed
shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows (in thousands, except
per-share amounts):
F-14
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Redeemed
(1)
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
|
Approximate
Dollar
Value of Shares
Available That
May Yet Be
Redeemed
Under the
Program (1)
|
|||||||||
January2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||
February
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||
March
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||
April
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||
May
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||
June
2009
|
17,245 | $ | 9.99 | $ | — | |||||||
July
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
August
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
September
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
October
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
November
2009
|
1,000 | $ | 9.95 | $ | — | |||||||
December
2009
|
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
18,245 |
(1) As
long as our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or
traded on an over-the-counter market, our stockholders who have held their stock
for at least one year may be able to have all or any portion of their shares
redeemed in accordance with the procedures outlined in the prospectus relating
to the shares they purchased. Under our current stock repurchase program, the
repurchase price will vary depending on the purchase price paid by the
stockholder and the number of years these shares were held. During this offering
and each of the first seven years following the closing of this offering, (i) we
will have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would cause total
redemptions to exceed the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment program in
the prior year, and (ii) we may not, except to repurchase the shares of a
deceased shareholder, redeem more than 5% of the number of shares outstanding at
the end of the prior calendar year. With respect to redemptions requested within
two years of the death of a stockholder, we may, but will not be obligated to,
redeem shares even if such redemption causes the number of shares redeemed to
exceed 5% of the number of shares outstanding at the end of the prior calendar
year. Beginning seven years after termination of this primary offering, unless
we have commenced another liquidity event, such as an orderly liquidation or
listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, we will modify our
stock repurchase program to permit us to redeem up to 10% of the number of
shares outstanding at the end of the prior year, using proceeds from any source,
including the sale of assets.
Our board
of directors may modify our stock repurchase program so that we can redeem stock
using the proceeds from the sale of our real estate investments or other
sources.
Employee
and Director Incentive Stock Plan
We have
adopted an Employee and Director Incentive Stock Plan (“the Plan”) which
provides for the grant of awards to our directors and full-time employees, as
well as other eligible participants that provide services to us. We have no
employees, and we do not intend to grant awards under the Plan to persons who
are not directors of ours. Awards granted under the Plan may consist of
nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock, share
appreciation rights, and dividend equivalent rights. The term of the Plan is 10
years. The total number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
the Plan is equal to 10% of our outstanding shares of stock at any time. As of
December 31, 2009 we have not granted any awards under the
Plan.
F-15
Tax
Treatment of Distributions
The
income tax treatment for the distributions per share to common stockholders
reportable for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 as
follows:
Per Common Shares
|
2009
|
2008 (1)
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Return
of capital
|
$
|
0.75
|
100.00
|
%
|
$
|
0.29
|
100.00
|
%
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
(1) Dividend per common share for 2008 is
calculated based on 139 days outstanding during the year.
7. Related Party
Transactions
Our
company has no employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our
business affairs and carrying out the directives of our board of directors. We
have an Advisory agreement with the Advisor and a dealer manager agreement with
PCC which entitle the Advisor and PCC to specified fees upon the provision of
certain services with regard to the Offering and investment of funds in real
estate projects, among other services, as well as reimbursement for
organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and PCC on our behalf
and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in
providing services to us.
Advisory
Agreement
Under the
terms of the Advisory agreement, our Advisor will use commercially reasonable
efforts to present to us investment opportunities to provide a continuing and
suitable investment program consistent with the investment policies and
objectives adopted by our board of directors. The Advisory agreement calls for
our Advisor to provide for our day-to-day management and to retain property
managers and leasing agents, subject to the authority of our board of directors,
and to perform other duties.
The fees
and expense reimbursements payable to our Advisor under the Advisory agreement
are described below.
Organizational and Offering
Costs. Costs of the Offering have been paid by the Advisor on our behalf
and will be reimbursed to the Advisor from the proceeds of the Offering.
Organizational and offering costs consist of all expenses (other than sales
commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with the
offering, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees,
charges of our escrow holder and other accountable offering expenses, including,
but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse our Advisor for all marketing
related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of
our Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our
shares (ii) technology costs associated with the offering of our shares; (iii)
our costs of conducting training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of
attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v)
payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. In no event will
we have any obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering
costs totaling in excess of 3.5% of the gross proceeds from the Primary
Offering. As of December 31, 2009, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred
on our behalf organizational and offering costs totaling approximately $3.3
million in organization and offering expenses, including approximately $0.1
million of organizational costs that have been expensed, of which, approximately
$1.9 million had been reimbursed to the Advisor. As of December 31, 2008, the
Advisor and its affiliates had incurred on our behalf organizational and
offering costs totaling approximately $2.8 million, of which, $0.4 million had
been reimbursed to the Advisor. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 3.8% of
organizational and offerings costs had been reimbursed to the Advisor. As of
December 31, 2008, approximately 4.1% of organizational and offerings costs had
been reimbursed to the Advisor.
Acquisition Fees and
Expenses. The Advisory Agreement requires us to pay the Advisor
acquisition fees in an amount equal to 2% of the investments acquired, including
any debt attributable to such investments. A portion of the acquisition fees
will be paid upon receipt of the offering proceeds after reaching the minimum
offering amount, and the balance will be paid at the time we acquire a property.
However, if the Advisory Agreement is terminated or not renewed, the Advisor
must return acquisition fees not yet allocated to one of our investments. In
addition, we are required to reimburse the Advisor for direct costs the Advisor
incurs and amounts the Advisor pays to third parties in connection with the
selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. For
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Advisor earned approximately
$1.1 million and $0.2 million in acquisition fees, respectively. No acquisition
fees were earned in 2007.
Management Fees. The
Advisory agreement requires us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee
of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the aggregate basis book carrying values of
our assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in and loans
secured by real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other
similar non-cash reserves, calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, we
will reimburse the Advisor for the direct costs and expenses incurred by the
Advisor in providing asset management services to us, including personnel and
related employment costs related to providing asset management services on our
behalf and amounts paid by our Advisor to Servant Investments, LLC and Servant
Healthcare Investments, LLC for portfolio management services provided on our
behalf. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees that we
expect to pay to third party property managers. For the year ended 2009, the
Advisor earned approximately $211,000 of asset management fees which were
expensed. In addition, we reimbursed our Advisor for approximately $0.1 million
of direct and indirect costs incurred by our Advisor in providing asset
management services. No such costs were incurred in 2008 or
2007.
F-16
Operating Expenses.
The Advisory agreement provides for reimbursement of our Advisor’s direct and
indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. For
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, $585,000, $448,000 and $41,000 of
such costs were incurred, respectively. Four fiscal quarters after the
acquisition of our first real estate asset, and every fiscal quarter thereafter,
our advisor must reimburse us the amount by which our total operating expenses
for the prior 12 months exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets
or 25% of our net income unless our independent directors committee determines
that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring
factors.
Disposition Fee. The
Advisory agreement provides that if the Advisor or its affiliate provides a
substantial amount of the services (as determined by a majority of our
directors, including a majority of our independent directors) in connection with
the sale of one or more properties, we will pay the Advisor or such affiliate
shall receive at closing a disposition fee up to 3% of the sales price of such
property or properties. This disposition fee may be paid in addition to real
estate commissions paid to non-affiliates, provided that the total real estate
commissions (including such disposition fee) paid to all persons by us for each
property shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 6% of the
aggregate contract sales price of each property or (ii) the competitive real
estate commission for each property. We will pay the disposition fees for a
property at the time the property is sold. No such costs were incurred in 2009,
2008 and 2007.
Subordinated Participation
Provisions. The Advisor is entitled to receive a subordinated
participation upon the sale of our properties, listing of our common stock or
termination of the Advisor, as follows:
|
·
|
After we pay stockholders
cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 6%
cumulative, non-compounded return, the Advisor will be paid a subordinated
participation in net sale proceeds ranging from a low of 5% of net sales
provided investors have earned annualized return of 6% to a high of 15% of
net sales proceeds if investors have earned annualized returns of 10% or
more.
|
|
·
|
Upon termination of the advisory
agreement, the Advisor will receive the subordinated performance fee due
upon termination. This fee ranges from a low of 5% of the amount by which
the sum of the appraised value of our assets minus our liabilities on the
date the advisory agreement is terminated plus total distributions (other
than stock distributions) paid prior to termination of the advisory
agreement exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns
of 6%, to a high of 15% of the amount by which the sum of the appraised
value of our assets minus its liabilities plus all prior distributions
(other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital
plus annualized returns of 10% or
more.
|
|
·
|
In the event we list our stock
for trading, the Advisor will receive a subordinated incentive listing fee
instead of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds. This fee
ranges from a low of 5% of the amount by which the market value of our
common stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions)
exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 6%, to a
high of 15% of the amount by which the sum of the market value of our
stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions)
exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 10% or
more.
|
No such
costs were incurred in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Dealer
Manager Agreement
PCC, as
Dealer Manager, is entitled to receive a sales commission of up to 7% of gross
proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering. PCC, as Dealer Manager, is also
entitled to receive a dealer manager fee equal to up to 3% of gross proceeds
from sales in the Primary Offering. The Dealer Manager is also entitled to
receive a reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses up to 0.5% of the
gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering. The Advisory agreement
requires the Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses
including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering
expenses (but excluding acquisition fees and acquisition expenses discussed
above) to the extent are in excess of 13.5% of gross proceeds from the Offering.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we incurred approximately
$3.8 million, $1.0 million and $0, respectively, payable to PCC for dealer
manager fees and sales commissions.
F-17
8. Notes Payable
Caruth
Haven Court
On
January 22, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of the Caruth Haven Court,
we entered into a $14.0 million acquisition bridge loan with Cornerstone
Operating Partnership, L.P. Cornerstone Operating Partnership, L.P. is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc., a publicly
offered, non-traded REIT sponsored by affiliates of our sponsor. The loan which
bore interest at a variable rate of 300 basis points over prime rate was repaid
on December 16, 2009 using cash from our ongoing offering and proceeds from a
new $10.0 million first mortgage loan.
The $10.0
million first mortgage loan has a 10-year term, maturing on December 16, 2019
and bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.43% per annum, with fixed monthly
payments of approximately $62,747 based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The
loan is secured by a deed of trust on Caruth Haven Court, and by an assignment
of the leases and rents payable to the borrower.
During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we incurred approximately
$29,000, $0 and $0 of interest expense, respectively, related to this loan.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we incurred
approximately $802,000, $0 and $0 of interest expense, respectively, related to
the bridge loan. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan had a
balance of approximately $10.0 million and $0, respectively.
The
Oaks Bradenton
On May 1,
2009, in connection with the acquisition of The Oaks Bradenton, we borrowed a
total of $2.76 million pursuant to two loan agreements. Of the total loan
amount, $2.4 million matures on May 1, 2014 with no option to extend and bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% per annum. The remaining $360,000 matures on
May 1, 2014 and bears interest at a variable rate equivalent to prevailing
market certificate deposits rate plus a 1.5% margin. We may repay the loan, in
whole or in part, on or before May 1, 2014, subject to prepayment premiums.
Monthly payments for the first twelve months will be interest only. Monthly
payments beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal
based on a 25-year amortization period. The loan agreement contains various
covenants including financial covenants with respect to debt service coverage
ratios, fixed charge coverage ratio and tenant rent coverage ratio. As of
December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all these financial
covenants.
During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we incurred approximately
$111,000, $0 and $0 of interest expense, respectively, related to the loan
agreements. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fixed rate loan
agreement had a balance of approximately $2.4 million and $0, respectively and
the variable rate loan agreement had a balance of $360,000 and $0,
respectively.
Mesa
Vista Inn Health Center
On
December 31, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of the Mesa Vista Inn
Health Center, we entered into an assumption and amendment of an existing
mortgage loan. Pursuant to the assumption agreement, we assumed the outstanding
principal balance of $7.5 million. The loan matures on January 5, 2015 and bears
interest at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum. We may repay the loan, in whole or
in part, on or before January 5, 2015 without incurring any prepayment penalty.
Principal and interest on the loan are due and payable in monthly installments
of $56,335 until the maturity date, when the entire remaining balance of
principal and accrued interest is due, assuming no prior principal
prepayment.
During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we incurred approximately
$1,000, $0 and $0 of interest expense, respectively, related to this loan
agreement. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the loan agreement had
a balance of approximately $7.5 million and $0, respectively.
In
connection with our notes payable, we had incurred financing costs totaling
approximately $339,000 and $41,000, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. These financing costs have been capitalized and are being
amortized over the life of the agreements. For the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, approximately $111,000, $0 and $0, respectively, of
deferred financing costs were amortized and included in interest expense in the
consolidated statements of operations.
The
principal payments due on our notes payable as of December 31, 2009 for each of
the next five years are as follows:
F-18
Year
|
Principal
amount
|
|||
2010
|
$
|
288,000
|
||
2011
|
$
|
352,000
|
||
2012
|
$
|
373,000
|
||
2013
|
$
|
401,000
|
||
2014
|
$
|
2,972,000
|
||
2015
and thereafter
|
$
|
15,874,000
|
9. Commitments and
Contingencies
Commitments
Under the
purchase and sale agreement executed in connection with the GreenTree at
Westwood acquisition, a portion of the purchase price for the property is to be
calculated and paid to the seller as earnout payments based upon the net
operating income, as defined, of the property during each of the three-years
following our acquisition of the property. The maximum aggregate amount that the
seller may receive under the earnout provision is $1.0 million. As of December
31, 2009, we had accrued approximately $394,000, which represents the present
value of our estimated liability under this earnout provision.
We
monitor our property for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While
there can be no assurance that a material environment liability does not exist,
we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to the
properties that would have a material effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any environmental
liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental
liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording
of a loss contingency.
Our
commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate
owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of
management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are
not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, are any
material litigation threatened against the Company which if determined
unfavorably to us would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows,
financial condition or results of operations.
Litigation
We are
not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, any
material litigation threatened against us which if determined unfavorably to us
would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated cash flows, financial
condition or results of operations.
10.
Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)
Set forth
below is certain unaudited quarterly financial information. We believe that all
necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have
been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly, and in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, the selected quarterly
information when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements.
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2009
|
September 30,
2009
|
June 30,
2009
|
March 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
2,072,000
|
$
|
1,889,000
|
$
|
1,645,000
|
$
|
1,055,000
|
||||||||
Expenses
|
3,030,000
|
2,428,000
|
2,329,000
|
1,983,000
|
||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
$
|
(958,000
|
)
|
$
|
(539,000
|
)
|
$
|
(684,000
|
)
|
$
|
(928,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,244,000
|
)
|
$
|
(829,000
|
)
|
$
|
(958,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,118,000
|
)
|
||||
Noncontrolling
interest
|
$
|
(57,000
|
)
|
$
|
8,000
|
$
|
24,000
|
$
|
10,000
|
|||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(1,301,000
|
)
|
$
|
(821,000
|
)
|
$
|
(934,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,108,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss per common share attributable to common stockholders — basic and
diluted
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
||||
Weighted
average shares
|
4,160,842
|
2,775,594
|
1,838,828
|
1,240,370
|
F-19
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2008
|
September 30,
2008
|
June 30,
2008
|
March 31,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||
Expenses
|
471,000
|
389,000
|
177,000
|
196,000
|
||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
$
|
(471,000
|
)
|
$
|
(389,000
|
)
|
$
|
(177,000
|
)
|
$
|
(196,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(466,000
|
)
|
$
|
(387,000
|
)
|
$
|
(177,000
|
)
|
$
|
(197,000
|
)
|
||||
Noncontrolling
interest
|
$
|
(3,000
|
)
|
$
|
(3,000
|
)
|
$
|
19,000
|
$
|
108,000
|
||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(469,000
|
)
|
$
|
(390,000
|
)
|
$
|
(158,000
|
)
|
$
|
(89,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss per common share attributable to common stockholders — basic and
diluted
|
$
|
(0.63
|
)
|
$
|
(3.62
|
)
|
$
|
(1,580.00
|
)
|
$
|
(890.00
|
)
|
||||
Weighted
average shares
|
748,006
|
107,743
|
100
|
100
|
11. Business
Combinations
We
completed four properties acquisitions during 2009. The following summary
provides the allocation of the acquired assets and liabilities of Caruth Haven
Court, The Oaks Bradenton, GreenTree at Westwood and Mesa Vista Inn Health
Center (the “2009 Acquisitions”) as of the respective dates of acquisitions. We
have accounted for the acquisitions as a business combination under U.S. GAAP.
Under business combination accounting, the assets and liabilities of acquired
properties were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair
values, and consolidated in our financial statements. The break down of the
purchase price of the four acquired properties:
Caruth
Haven
Court
|
The Oaks
Bradenton
|
GreenTree
at
Westwood
|
Mesa Vista Inn
Health Center
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Land
|
$
|
4,256,000
|
$
|
390,000
|
$
|
714,000
|
$
|
2,010,000
|
$
|
7,370,000
|
||||||||||
Buildings
& improvements
|
13,871,000
|
2,733,000
|
3,670,000
|
10,264,000
|
30,538,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Site
improvements
|
115,000
|
86,000
|
47,000
|
166,000
|
414,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Furniture
& fixtures
|
273,000
|
112,000
|
131,000
|
559,000
|
1,075,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Intangible
assets
|
1,370,000
|
773,000
|
619,000
|
-
|
2,762,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
42,000
|
-
|
18,000
|
11,000
|
71,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Note
payable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(7,500,000
|
)
|
(7,500,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Security
deposits and other liabilities
|
(237,000
|
)
|
(12,000
|
)
|
(597,000
|
)
|
(747,000
|
)
|
(1,593,000
|
)
|
||||||||||
Goodwill
|
363,000
|
406,000
|
372,000
|
-
|
1,141,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Real
estate acquisitions
|
$
|
20,053,000
|
$
|
4,488,000
|
$
|
4,974,000
|
$
|
4,763,000
|
$
|
34,278,000
|
||||||||||
Acquisition
Expenses
|
$
|
845,000
|
$
|
271,000
|
$
|
163,000
|
$
|
434,000
|
$
|
1,713,000
|
The
Company recorded revenues and net losses for the year ended December 31, 2009 of
approximately $6.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, related to the 2009
Acquisitions. The following unaudited pro forma information for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 has been prepared to reflect the incremental effect
of the 2009 Acquisitions as if such acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2009
and 2008.
Year ended
December 31, 2009
|
Year ended
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
10,724,000
|
$
|
10,909,000
|
||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,071,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,499,000
|
)
|
||
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common
stockholders
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
$
|
(1.28
|
)
|
F-20
12. Subsequent
Event
On
January 12, 2010, through a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, we contributed
into a joint venture along with Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating
Partnership, L.P., an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor that is also advised by
Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, and affiliates of The Cirrus Group,
an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $16.3 million free-standing medical
facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome,
Georgia.
We
invested approximately $2.7 million to acquire an 83.3% equity interest in
Cornerstone Rome LTH Partners LLC (the “Cornerstone JV Entity”) through a
wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, Cornerstone Healthcare
Plus Operating Partnership, L.P. The Cornerstone Co-Investor invested
approximately $532,000 to acquire the remaining 16.7% interest in the
Cornerstone JV Entity. The aggregate budgeted development cost for the proposed
development of the long-term acute care medical facility is approximately $16.3
million. The Cornerstone JV Entity contributed approximately $3.2 million of
capital to acquire a 90% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP
(the “Rome Joint Venture”). The development cost will be funded with
approximately $3.54 million of initial capital from the Rome Joint Venture and a
$12.75 million construction loan. We expect to fund our portion of any future
required capital contributions using proceeds raised in our ongoing public
offering.
In
connection with this development, the Rome Joint Venture entered into a $12.75
million construction loan. The loan will mature on December 18, 2012, with two
1-year extension options dependent on certain financial covenants. The loan
bears a variable interest rate with a spread of 300 basis points over 1-month
LIBOR with a floor of 6.15%. Monthly payments for the first twelve months will
be interest-only. Monthly payments beginning the thirteenth month will include
interest and principal based on a 25-year amortization period.
Sale
of Shares of Common Stock
As of
March 12, 2010, we had raised approximately $58.4 million through the issuance
of approximately 5.9 million shares of our common stock under our Offering,
excluding, approximately132,000 shares that were issued pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan reduced by approximately 28,000 shares pursuant
to our stock repurchase program.
13. Segment
Reporting
During
the third quarter of 2010, we realigned our business operations to have two
reportable business segments: senior living operations and triple-net leased
properties. As a result of the realignment, segment information for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, have been recast to reflect the
realigned segment structure. Our senior living operations segment primarily
consists of investments in senior housing communities located in the United
States for which we engage independent third parties to manage the operations.
Our triple-net leased properties segment consists of acquiring and owning
healthcare properties in the United States and leasing those properties to
healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases,
which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses.
We
evaluate performance of the combined properties in each segment based on net
operating income. Net operating income is defined as total revenue less property
operating and maintenance expenses. There are no intersegment sales or
transfers.
The
following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated net income for
the year ended December 31, 2009:
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Senior
living
operations
|
Triple-net
leased
properties
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
6,661,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,661,000
|
||||||
Less:
Property operating and maintenance
|
5,172,000
|
-
|
5,172,000
|
|||||||||
Net
operating income
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,489,000
|
||||||
Less:
|
||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,206,000
|
|||||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
211,000
|
|||||||||||
Real
estate acquisition costs
|
1,814,000
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,367,000
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
(13,000
|
)
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,053,000
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,149,000
|
)
|
F-21
The
following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated net income for
the year ended December 31, 2008:
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Senior
living
operations
|
Triple-net
leased
properties
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Less:
Property operating and maintenance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
operating income
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Less
|
||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
|
|
875,000
|
|||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||
Real
estate acquisition costs
|
|
|
358,000
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
|
|
1,000
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,227,000
|
)
|
The
following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated net income for
the year ended December 31, 2007:
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Senior
living
operations
|
Triple-net
leased
properties
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Less:
Property operating and maintenance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
operating income
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Less
|
||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
|
|
209,000
|
|||||||||
Asset
management fees
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||
Real
estate acquisition costs
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
|
|
3,000
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(206,000
|
)
|
F-22
The
following tables reconcile the segment activity to consolidated financial
position as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
December 31, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Senior
living operations:
|
||||||||
Total
investment in real estate
|
$ | 27,888,000 | $ | - | ||||
Triple-net
leased facilities
|
||||||||
Total
investment in real estate
|
13,000,000 | - | ||||||
Total
reportable segments
|
40,888,000 | - | ||||||
Reconciliation
to consolidated assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
14,900,000 | 7,449,000 | ||||||
Deferred
financing costs, net
|
228,000 | 41,000 | ||||||
Tenant
and other receivables,
|
481,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Deferred
costs and other assets
|
338,000 | 472,000 | ||||||
Restricted
cash
|
364,000 | - | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,141,000 | - | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 58,340,000 | $ | 7,972,000 |
As of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, goodwill had a balance of approximately
$1.1 million and $0 million, respectively. The increase is due to the
acquisition of Caruth Haven Court on January 22, 2009, The Oaks Bradenton on May
1, 2009 and Greentree on December 31, 2009. All goodwill was derived from senior
living operations as of December 31, 2009.
F-23
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE
II
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December
31, 2009
Description
|
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
|
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
|
Deductions
|
Balance at
End of
Period
|
||||||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
11,000
|
$
|
(11,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
F-24
CORNERSTONE
HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Schedule
III
REAL
ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December
31, 2009
Initial Cost
|
Costs
Captialized
|
Gross Amount Invested
|
Life on which
Depreciation in
Latest Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Building &
|
Subsequent to
|
Building and
|
Accumulated
|
Date of
|
Date
|
Statement is
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Encumbrances
|
Land
|
Improv.
|
Acquisition
|
Land
|
Improv.
|
Total
|
Depreciation
|
Construct
|
Acquired
|
Computed
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Caruth
Haven
Court
Highland
Park,
TX
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
$
|
4,256,000
|
$
|
13,986,000
|
$
|
91,000
|
$
|
4,256,000
|
$
|
14,077,000
|
$
|
18,333,000
|
$
|
354,000
|
1999
|
01/22/09
|
39
years
|
||||||||||||
The
Oaks Bradenton Bradenton, FL
|
$
|
2,760,000
|
390,000
|
2,819,000
|
2,000
|
390,000
|
2,820,000
|
3,210,000
|
51,000
|
1996
|
05/01/09
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||
GreenTree
Columbus, IN
|
—
|
714,000
|
3,717,000
|
—
|
714,000
|
3,717,000
|
4,431,000
|
—
|
1998
|
12/30/09
|
39
years
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mesa
Vista Inn Health Center San Antonio, TX
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
2,010,000
|
10,430,000
|
—
|
2,010,000
|
10,431,000
|
12,441,000
|
—
|
2008
|
12/31/09
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$
|
20,260,000
|
$
|
7,370,000
|
$
|
30,952,000
|
$
|
93,000
|
$
|
7,370,000
|
$
|
31,045,000
|
$
|
38,415,000
|
$
|
405,000
|
(a) The
changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2009 are as
follows.
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
2009
Acquisitions
|
30,952,000
|
399,000
|
||||||
2009
Additions
|
93,000
|
6,000
|
||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
31,045,000
|
$
|
405,000
|
(b) For
federal income tax purposes, the aggregate cost of our four properties is
approximately $43.2 million.
F-25