Savoy Energy Corp - FORM 10-Q - November 15, 2010

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - Savoy Energy Corp	v202470_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - Savoy Energy Corp	v202470_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - Savoy Energy Corp	v202470_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

¨	Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 333-151960

Savoy Energy Corporation

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada	26-0429687
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

11200 Westheimer, Suite 900

Houston, TX 77042

(Address of principal executive offices)

(713) 243-8788

(Issuer’s telephone number)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

¨ Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer	¨ Accelerated filer
¨ Non-accelerated filer	x Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 59,696,000 common shares as of November 1, 2010.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:	Financial Statements	3

Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16

Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19

Item 4T:	Controls and Procedures	20

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	21

Item 1A:	Risk Factors	21

Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	21

Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	21

Item 4:	(Removed and Reserved)	21

Item 5:	Other Information	22

Item 6:	Exhibits	22

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009;		4

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009;		5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009;		6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).		7

SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28,787		$	60,345
Accounts receivable		-			2,372
Total current assets		28,787			62,717

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Oil and gas properties, using the full cost method		721,819			761,987
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment		(656,264	)		(650,813	)
Property and equipment, net		65,555			111,174

TOTAL ASSETS	$	94,342		$	173,891

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	171,308		$	354,088
Advances from related party		151,003			151,003
Accrued interest payable		52,139			57,996
Notes payable		402,500			447,500
Total current liabilities		776,950			1,010,587

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Asset retirement obligations		12,461			9,683
TOTAL LIABILITIES		789,411			1,020,270

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 59,696,000 and 31,296,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		59,696			31,296
Additional paid-in-capital		1,760,967			704,317
Accumulated deficit		(2,515,732	)		(1,581,992	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(695,069	)		(846,379	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	94,342		$	173,891

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009

REVENUE
Oil and gas revenues	$	12,650		$	5,862		$	48,043		$	25,005
Total revenues		12,650			5,862			48,043			25,005

COSTS AND EXPENSES
Lease operating expenses		10,420			8,890			36,516			51,463
General and administrative expense		116,291			173,426			997,605			605,531
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment expense		934			452			5,451			2,317
Accretion expense		926			-			2,778			-
Gain on sale of assets		(76,944	)		-			(310,264	)		-
Total costs and expenses		51,627			182,768			732,086			659,311
Operating loss		(38,977	)		(176,906	)		(684,043	)		(634,306	)

OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		(3,054	)		(6,031	)		(7,597	)		(34,331	)
Loss on settlement of debt		-			-			(242,100	)		-
Total other expenses		(3,054	)		(6,031	)		(249,697	)		(34,331	)

Net loss	$	(42,031	)	$	(182,937	)	$	(933,740	)	$	(668,637	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		59,696,000			28,996,000			52,198,198			39,352,835

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	For the Nine			For the Nine
	Months Ended			Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(933,740	)	$	(668,637	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment		5,451			2,317
Accretion expense		2,778			-
Stock based compensation		611,950			368,570
Loss on settlement of debt		242,100			-
Gain on sale of assets		(310,264	)		-
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		2,372			16,672
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		190			100,529
Advances from related party		-			14,655
Net cash used in operating activities		(379,163	)		(165,894	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties		409,048			-
Capital expenditures for development of oil and gas properties		(40,043	)		-
Purchase of oil and gas properties		(28,900	)		-
Net cash provided by investment activities		340,105			-

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt		120,000			191,003
Return of capital		(15,000	)		-
Repayment of debt		(97,500	)		(20,629	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		7,500			170,374

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		(31,558	)		4,480
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year		60,345			-
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year	$	28,787		$	4,480

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income tax	$	-		$	-
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Return of capital	$	52,800		$	-
Common stock issued for debt	$	67,500		$	-
Common stock issued for accrued expenses	$	178,500		$	-

See notes to consolidated financial statements

SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Savoy Energy Corporation ("the Company") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in Savoy’s annual report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent year 2009 as reported in Form 10-K have been omitted.

NOTE 2 – ORGANIZATION AND HISTORY

Savoy Energy Corporation (the “Company” or “we”) was incorporated as “Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics, Inc.” on June 25, 2007, in the State of Nevada. Our principal offices are located at 11200 Westheimer, Suite 900, Houston, TX 77042 and our telephone number is (713) 243-8788.

On March 31, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Plantation Exploration, Inc., a privately held Texas corporation (“Plantation Exploration”), and Plantation Exploration Acquisition, Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”), a newly formed wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary. In connection with the closing of this merger transaction, Acquisition Sub merged with and into Plantation Exploration (the “Merger”) on April 2, 2009, with the filing of articles of merger with the Texas Secretary of State. As a result of the Merger, Plantation Acquisition no longer exists and Plantation Exploration became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

On April 3, 2009, we merged with another wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, known as Savoy Energy Corporation in a short-form merger transaction under Nevada law and, in connection with this short form merger, changed our name to Savoy Energy Corporation.

Effective June 2, 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved a forward split of the Company’s common stock on the basis of four shares for each share issued and outstanding (4:1 split). The total number of authorized shares was not changed. The Company’s financial statements reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.

The results of operations and cash flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 included within the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 reflect only the results of Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics, Inc., as the acquisition of Plantation Exploration, Inc., occurred on April 2, 2009. The following (unaudited) pro forma consolidated results of operations have been prepared as if the acquisition of Plantation Exploration, Inc. had occurred as of the first day of the period presented:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Total revenues	$	40,469
Net loss		(700,728	)
Net loss per share—Basic		(0.02	)
Net loss per share—Diluted		(0.02	)

The pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of that time, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.

Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are based on a number of significant estimates, including oil and gas reserve quantities which are the basis for the calculation of depreciation, depletion and impairment of oil and gas properties, and timing and costs associated with its retirement obligations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and financial instruments which mature within three months of the date of purchase.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As at September 30, 2010, the fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable approximate carrying values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its oil and natural gas properties, whereby all costs incurred in connection with the acquisition, exploration for and development of petroleum and natural gas reserves are capitalized. Such costs include lease acquisition, geological and geophysical activities, rentals on non-producing leases, drilling, completing and equipping of oil and gas wells and administrative costs directly attributable to those activities and asset retirement costs. Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capital costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized to income.

Depletion and depreciation of proved oil and gas properties is calculated on the units-of-production method based upon estimates of proved reserves. Such calculations include the estimated future costs to developed proved reserves. Oil and gas reserves are converted to a common unit of measure based on the energy content of 6,000 cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil. Costs of undeveloped properties are not included in the costs subject to depletion. These costs are assessed periodically for impairment.

The fair value of an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The present value of the estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. For the Company, asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) relate to the plugging and abandonment of drilled oil and gas properties. The amounts recognized are based upon numerous estimates including future retirement costs; future recoverable reserve quantities and reserve lives; and the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.

Ceiling test

In applying the full cost method, The Company performs an impairment test (ceiling test) at each reporting date, whereby the carrying value of property and equipment is compared to the value of its proved reserves discounted at a 10-percent interest rate of future net revenues, based on current economic and operating conditions, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties included in costs being amortized, less the income tax effects related to book and tax basis differences of the properties.

Oil and gas properties, not subject to amortization

The amortization of the oil and gas properties not classified as proved begins when the oil and gas properties become proved, or their values become impaired. The Company assesses the realizability of its properties not characterized as proved on at least an annual basis or when there is or has been an indication that an impairment in value may have occurred. The impairment of properties not classified as proved is assessed based on management’s intention with regard to future exploration and development of individually significant properties, and the Company’s ability to secure capital funding to finance such exploration and development. If the result of an assessment indicates that a property is impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs in its full cost pool and they are amortized over production from proved reserves

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sale of oil and natural gas are recognized when the product is delivered at a fixed or determinable price, title has transferred, and collectability is reasonably assured and evidenced by a contract. For oil sales, this occurs when the customer's truck takes delivery of oil from the operators’ storage tanks.

The Company follows the “sales method” of accounting for oil and natural gas revenue, so it recognizes revenue on all natural gas or crude oil sold to purchasers, regardless of whether the sales are proportionate to its ownership in the property. A receivable or liability is recognized only to the extent that the Company has an imbalance on a specific property greater than its share of the expected remaining proved reserves.

Costs associated with production are expensed in the period incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated fair value of equity awards vested during the reporting period. The expense for equity awards vested during the reporting period is determined based upon the grant date fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period of the stock award using the straight-line method.

Deferred Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and accrued tax liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Earnings per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During the reporting period when they are anti-dilutive, common share equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect recent accounting standards or interpretations issued or recently adopted to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operations or cash flows.

Dividends

Dividends declared on our common stock are reflected as adjustments to retained earnings to the extent a surplus of retained earnings will exist after giving effect to the dividends. To the extent retained earnings are insufficient to fund the distributions; such payments constitute a return of contributed capital rather than earnings and are accounted for as a reduction to paid-in capital.

NOTE 4 - GOING CONCERN

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has a working capital deficit, has generated limited revenues and has an accumulated deficit. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In order to continue as a going concern and achieve a profitable level of operations, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources and to develop a consistent source of revenues sufficient to meet operating expenses. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the ability to raise equity or debt financing, and the attainment of profitable operations from the Company's operations.

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern

NOTE 5 – OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

On March 31, 2010, the Company secured a 2.75% working interest in the Glass 59 #2 well in Sterling County, Texas that is operated by Bright & Company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company made payments totaling $24,891 for drilling and completion costs.

In June 2010, the Company acquired the Davis-Cornell oil and gas lease for $28,900. The lease acreage is located in Gonzales County, Texas, and is comprised of 144 acres. The Company acquired a 75% undivided working interest in the unproven reserves, and the sellers retained a 25% undivided working interest.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred additional development costs on its Ali-O, Rozella Kifer and Zavadil oil and gas properties totaling $15,152.

During June 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement with a shareholder and working interest participant in certain oil and gas properties located in Gonzales County, Texas to allow the shareholder to put their interest in the properties to the Company. Pursuant to the option agreement, Savoy agreed to issue 2,640,000 shares of common stock to the shareholder, together with future monthly payments of $5,000 per month to the shareholder until the holding period lapses and the restrictive legend can be removed from the face of the share certificate. Upon the restriction removal, the monthly payment will cease and the shareholder has the option to assign their interest in the oil and gas properties to Savoy. The 2,640,000 shares of common stock granted to the shareholder were valued at $52,800, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant and was recorded as a return of capital to the shareholder. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid $15,000 to the shareholder under the agreement which was recorded as a return of capital to the shareholder.

In May 2010, the Company sold certain overriding royalty interests to Lucas Energy, Inc. for $92,568. The overriding royalty interests are associated with the Company’s producing wells in the Austin Chalk formation. The Company retained its existing working interests in the Austin Chalk producing formation. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the proceeds of $92,568 were recognized as a gain on sale of assets. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, management re-assessed its initial accounting for the gain of $92,558 recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and determined that a gain of $68,902 was the gain on sale of assets. Management evaluated the impact of recording the adjustment to the gain during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as opposed to the three months ended June 30, 2010 and concluded that it did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In June 2010, the Company sold a 92.5% undivided interest in its Eagle Ford formation “deep rights” located in Gonzales County, Texas to Lucas Energy, Inc. for $140,752. The “deep rights” sold are unevaluated oil and gas properties associated with the Company’s producing wells in the Austin Chalk formation. The Company retained its existing working interests in the Austin Chalk producing formation. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the proceeds of $140,752 were recognized as a gain on sale of assets. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, management re-assessed its initial accounting for the gain of $140,752 recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and determined that a gain of $104,104 was the gain on sale of assets. Management evaluated the impact of recording the adjustment to the gain during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as opposed to the three months ended June 30, 2010 and concluded that it did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In July 2010, the Company sold a 92.5% undivided interest in its Eagle Ford formation “deep rights” located in Gonzales County, Texas to Lucas Energy, Inc. for $123,228. The “deep rights” sold are unevaluated oil and gas properties. The Company retained its existing working interests in the Austin Chalk producing formation. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a gain of $94,381 on sale of assets.

In September 2010, the Company sold its 51.5% working and revenue interest and the support equipment on the Ali-O No. 1 well in Gonzales County, Texas to Lucas Energy, Inc. for cash proceeds of $52,500 and forgiveness of payables in the amount of $10,327. The proceeds associated with the support equipment and forgiveness of payable totaling $42,877 was recorded as a gain on sale of assets. The proceeds associated with working and revenue interest totaling $19,950 were accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized.

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE

On September 24, 2008, Plantation Exploration, Inc. entered into a financing agreement with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) for cash advances totaling $290,000. On January 27, 2009 and May 4, 2009, the Company amended the September 24, 2008 agreement with OIL for advance cash payments under the demand loan and to assign the debt from Plantation Exploration to Savoy. The amended agreements provided for total borrowings of $335,000 and $360,000, respectively, due on demand. The interest is payable in-kind at 5,000 shares of common stock of the Company for each month the debt remains unpaid. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company has made payment reductions totaling $77,500. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 7,350,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $309,600 based on the quoted market value on the grant date. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of advances from OIL was $282,500.

On December 17, 2009, the Company borrowed $37,500 from a non-related third party bearing interest at 6% per annum. The loan is unsecured and the principal and accrued and unpaid interest was payable at maturity on June 30, 2010. The Company used the proceeds for working capital. On July 1, 2010 the outstanding balance on this loan plus accrued interest was repaid in full.

On December 29, 2009, the Company borrowed $50,000 from two non-related third parties bearing interest at 5% per annum. The loans are unsecured and the principal and accrued and unpaid interest was payable at maturity on June 30, 2010. The Company used the proceeds for working capital. One of the notes with an outstanding principal balance of $25,000 plus accrued interest was repaid on July 1, 2010; the other note with an outstanding principal balance of $25,000 plus accrued interest was repaid in full on July 6, 2010.

On March 19, 2010, the Company borrowed $40,000 from non-related third parties bearing interest at 5% per annum. The loans are unsecured and the principal and accrued and unpaid interest is payable at maturity on November 30, 2010. The Company used the proceeds for working capital. The outstanding balance of $40,000 has been classified as current debt at September 30, 2010.

On March 22, 2010, the Company borrowed $40,000 from non-related third parties bearing interest at 5% per annum. The loans are unsecured and the principal and accrued and unpaid interest is payable at maturity on November 30, 2010. The Company used the proceeds for working capital. The outstanding balance of $40,000 has been classified as current debt at September 30, 2010.

On April 21, 2010, the Company borrowed $40,000 from non-related third parties bearing interest at 5% per annum. The loans are unsecured and the principal and accrued and unpaid interest is payable at maturity on December 31, 2010. The Company used the proceeds for working capital. The outstanding balance of $40,000 has been classified as current debt at September 30, 2010.

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

From time to time, the Company receives cash advances from related parties, including stockholders and their affiliates, to cover operating expenses. The advances do not bear interest and are due upon demand. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company received no cash advances. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of advances from related party was $151,003.

NOTE 8 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Summary information regarding stock option activity is as follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at 12/31/09		8,000,000	$	1.00
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Cancelled/Expired		-		-
Outstanding at 09/30/10		8,000,000	$	1.00

Options outstanding and their relative exercise price at June 30, 2010 are as follows:

Exercise Price	Number of shares		Remaining life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In-the- money) Options
1.00		8,000,000	3.25 years	$	-
		8,000,000		$	-

NOTE 9 - COMMON STOCK

On January 26, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares valued at $56,000, based on the fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Excelsus Capital Partners, LLC for services rendered. The value of the shares were recognized in the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

On February 1, 2010, the Company issued 800,000 common shares valued at $44,800, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Rio Sterling Holdings, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $12,500 and recorded a realized loss of $32,300 on settlement of debt.

On February 1, 2010, the Company issued 800,000 common shares valued at $44,800, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Barclay Lyons, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $12,500 and recorded a realized loss of $32,300 on settlement of debt.

On February 1, 2010, the Company issued 1,250,000 common shares valued at $70,000, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Tombstone Capital, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $12,500 and recorded a realized loss of $57,500 on settlement of debt.

On March 4, 2010, the Company issued 10,000,000 common shares valued at $330,000, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Arthur Bertagnolli in satisfaction of accrued but unpaid employment compensation due to Arthur Bertagnolli of $43,500 and recorded compensation expense of $286,500 in exchange for services rendered.

On March 4, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares valued at $66,000, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to for investment banking services rendered.

On March 4, 2010, the Company issued 3,000,000 common shares valued at $99,000, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant for investment banking services rendered.

On March 4, 2010, the Company issued 500,000 common shares valued at $16,500, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant for legal services rendered.

On March 18, 2010, the Company issued 1,500,000 common shares valued at $52,500, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Rio Sterling Holdings, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $10,000 and recorded a realized loss of $42,500 on settlement of debt.

On March 18, 2010, the Company issued 1,500,000 common shares valued at $52,500, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Barclay Lyons, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $10,000 and recorded a realized loss of $42,500 on settlement of debt.

On April 15, 2010, the Company issued 1,500,000 common shares valued at $45,000, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Rio Sterling Holdings, LLC for payment on the Company’s note payable with Oil Investment Leases, Inc. (OIL) in the amount of $10,000 and recorded a realized loss of $35,000 on settlement of debt.

On April 26 and May 26, 2010, the Company issued 2,350,000 common shares valued at $58,500, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant for consulting services rendered.

On May 26, 2010, the Company issued 1,700,000 common shares valued at $153,400, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant to Directors in satisfaction of accrued but unpaid director fees of $133,726 and recorded an expense of $19,674, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, in exchange for services rendered.

On May 26, 2010, the Company issued 500,000 common shares valued at $11,500, based on fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant for legal services rendered.

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LITIGATION

During January 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party and paid the consultant a commitment fee of $5,000 and issued the consultant 1,000,000 fully vested shares of common stock (see Note 9). The Company amended the consulting agreement in March 2010 that extended the term for twelve months from the date of the amendment and issued the consultant 5,000,000 fully vested shares of common stock (2,000,000 shares on March 4, 2010 valued at $66,000 and 3,000,000 shares on March 4, 2010 valued at $99,000 – See Note 9). As amended, the consulting agreement includes the following commitments:

i.	The consultant will receive $5,000 per month for twelve months;

ii.	The consultant will receive a referral fee of 10% cash and 10% equity of the aggregate amount of each successful equity financing;

iii.	The consultant will receive a referral fee of 5% cash and 5% equity of the aggregate amount of each successful debt financing.

During March 2010, the Company executed an investor relations agreement whereby the Company, agreed to pay $120,000 in cash and 600,000 shares in common stock with an initial payment of $15,000 and issue 100,000 shares of common stock to be paid upon execution of the agreement. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has paid a total of $45,000 cash and issued 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $6,600, based on the fair market value using quoted market prices on the date of grant. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company terminated the agreement.

The Company’s Employment Agreement with Arthur Bertagnolli provides for certain compensation and benefits based on the Company’s achievement of specified milestones. As of September 30, 2010, none of those milestones have been achieved. Under certain circumstances, Mr. Bertagnolli is also entitled to an additional payment upon sale of the Company.

Panos Industries, LLC v. Savoy Energy Corporation, et. al., District Court, Clark County, Nevada Case # A-10-612340-C.

On March 19, 2010, this action was filed in the above-entitled Court seeking damages “…in excess of $50,000” based upon monies which the Plaintiff claims were advanced by Plaintiff on behalf of the Company. This action is in its very early stages and as of this date the Company has not been served with the Summons and Complaint and has therefore not filed any Answer to the Complaint. While the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted, the Company specifically denies that it is indebted to Plaintiff and believes that any claims purportedly asserted in the lawsuit are without merit. The Company further believes that it has meritorious claims against Plaintiff which arose in connection with the merger of the Company’s predecessor (Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics, Inc.) with Plantation Exploration, Inc. and in connection with the aftermath of the merger. The Company intends to vigorously defend any claims asserted by the Plaintiff and to aggressively prosecute its claims against the Plaintiff. Even if the Company is ultimately successful in defending this action, it will incur legal fees and other expenses in connection with such defense, the amount of which cannot be predicted at this time. Such expenses could have a material impact on the Company’s future operating results and have an adverse impact on the Company’s funds available for its operations.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with ASC 855, the Company evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were available to be issued. With the exception of those matters discussed below, there were no material subsequent events that required recognition or additional disclosure in these financial statements.

On October 25, 2010, an unrelated third party advanced $63,000 to the Company under the terms of a convertible promissory note. The convertible promissory note bears interest at 10% per annum and matures July 27, 2011, at which date the $63,000 and any accrued interest is payable. The convertible promissory note has a conversion price equal to 60% of the quoted market price for the Company’s common stock using the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the conversion date. The Company is required at all times to have authorized and reserved three times the number of shares that are actually issuable upon full conversion of the convertible promissory note. So long as the Company is not in default, the lender cannot exercise its conversion right for 180 days following the issuance date of the convertible promissory note. The Company has the right to prepay the convertible promissory note under certain specified terms and conditions. The terms and conditions to prepay the convertible promissory note are as follows: (i) the Company has not received a notice of conversion from the lender; (ii) from the date of issuance of the convertible promissory note up to one hundred twenty (120) days following the issuance date, the Company has the right, after giving the lender three days prior written notice, to prepay the outstanding principal and accrued interest, in full, in cash equal to 140% of the sum of the outstanding principal plus accrued and unpaid interest; (iii) from one hundred twenty one (121) days following the issuance date up to one hundred eighty (180) days following the issuance date, the Company has the right, after giving the lender three days prior written notice, to prepay the outstanding principal and accrued interest, in full, in cash equal to 150% of the sum of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest; (iv) after one hundred eighty (180) days following issuance date, the Company does not have right of prepayment. The Company’s management is currently assessing the terms of the convertible promissory to determine if its terms include any embedded derivatives that will need to be accounted for separately.

On October 21, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company unanimously adopted the following resolutions: (1) to seek shareholder approval to an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation to increase the Company's authorized capital to 310,000,000 shares comprising 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock par value $.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock par value $0.001 per share; and (2) to seek shareholder approval to amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's Common Stock. None of the aforementioned resolutions have become effective as of the date of this report.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Overview

We are in the business of re-entering, re-completing, extracting oil, and selling oil from previously undeveloped and drilled wells in the United States. Our plan of operations is to economically extract a significant amount of the “left-behind” oil from previously drilled sites.

We currently hold leases on or are producing oil from the following unproven and proven developed and undeveloped wells: our working interests in, Rozella Kifer No. 1, Zavadil No.1 and our 5.0% overriding royalty interest in W.L. Barnett ET AL #1 & #2. We also own a 2.75% working interest in the Glass 59 #2 well and a 75% working interest in the Davis-Cornell oil and gas lease. We will continue our workover efforts on these wells, and seek to duplicate our successful efforts with other wells. We have retained a petroleum consulting firm specializing in geological analyses of oil wells, to work with us to locate and screen a number of abandoned oil wells prospects for viability. Our evaluations include an assessment of production potential of each well using geological evaluations including the use of seismic data as available.

Once we have determined which wells have the greatest production potential and are most likely to respond to our workover efforts, we will then pursue acquiring interests in those wells. We will then engage in workover operations as with our previous wells, primarily through horizontal drilling and acidization. We intend to extract and sell crude oil through a third party purchaser.

Our strategy is to concentrate on existing low maintenance production, exploit low risk sidetrack drilling opportunities as and when identified, and use the accumulated information and results to advance operations.

Large oil companies with high overhead costs require high production rates for wells to be economically viable. Our small size and lower overhead allows profitably extraction of oil at low production rates. Our goal is to turn wells rendered uneconomical and abandoned by large companies into profitable ones.

On March 27, 2010 the Zavadil #1 well was placed online and closely monitored under full electric power. This is the second producing well that the Company has operating under full electric power.

Developments in Expansion of Wells

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred additional development costs on its Ali-O, Rozella Kifer and Zavadil oil and gas properties totaling $15,152.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

Revenues. Our total revenue reported for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $12,650 compared to $5,862 in the comparable period for the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increased pricing and production from our wells and the addition of new wells.

Lease Operating Expenses. The lease operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $10,420, compared to $8,890 in the comparable period of the prior year.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairment. Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $934 compared to $452 in the comparable period the prior year.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased to $116,291 from $173,426 for the comparable quarter in 2009, a decrease of $57,135. The decrease in general and administrative expense was largely attributable to the recognition of stock compensation expense in the prior year’s comparable quarter.

Gain on Sale of Assets. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the sale by the Company of certain oil and gas properties netted the Company an aggregate of $76,944 (see Developments in Expansion of Wells, above).

Other Income (Expenses). We recorded interest expense of $3,054 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $6,031 in the comparable quarter the prior year.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

Revenues. Our total revenue reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $48,043 compared to $25,005 in the comparable period for the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increased pricing and production from our wells and the addition of new wells.

Lease Operating Expenses. The lease operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $36,516, compared to $51,463 in the comparable period of the prior year.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairment. Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $5,451, compared to $2,317 in the comparable period the prior year.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $997,605 compared to $605,531 for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in general and administrative expense was largely attributable to the recognition of stock compensation expense in the current year period.

Gain on Sale of Oil and Gas Properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the sale by the Company of certain oil and gas properties netted the Company an aggregate of $310,264 (see Developments in Expansion of Wells, above).

Other Income (Expenses). We recorded interest expense of $7,597 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $34,331 in the comparable period the prior year. In addition, the Company recorded a loss on the settlement of certain debt of $242,100.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2010, we had total current assets of $28,787. Our total current liabilities as of September 30, 2010 were $776,950. Thus, we had a working capital deficit of $748,163 as of September 30, 2010.

Operating activities used $379,163 in cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our net loss of $933,740 was the primary component of our negative operating cash flow, offset by non-cash expenses—common stock-based compensation and loss on the settlement of a debt. Cash flows provided by investing activities were $340,105 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $0 in the comparable nine months of the prior year related to proceeds from the sale of assets slightly offset by the acquisition of oil and gas interests. Cash flows provided by financing activities during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was $7,500 consisting of proceeds from notes payable of $120,000, less repayments of $97,500 and a return of capital of $15,000.

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We have negative working capital and rely on proceeds from equity and loans to fund our operations. We intend to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Going Concern

Our financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have generated losses from operations, have an accumulated deficit and a working capital deficiency. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

In order to continue as a going concern and achieve a profitable level of operations, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources and to develop a consistent source of revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise equity or debt financing, and the attainment of profitable operations from our planned business.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to successfully accomplish the plan described in the preceding paragraph and eventually attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2010, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2010. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process and procedures designed under the supervision of the Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer who is also our Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures over financing reporting were not effective. This conclusion was based on the existence of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting previously disclosed and discussed below. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. To address the need for more effective internal controls, management has plans to improve the existing controls and implement new controls as our financial position and capital availability improves. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We identified and continue to have the following material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting:

There is a lack of segregation of duties and technical accounting expertise. Our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by an external consultant with no oversight by a professional with accounting expertise. Our management does not possess accounting expertise and hence our controls over the selection and application of accounting policies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles were inadequate and constitute a material weakness in the design of internal control over financial reporting. This weakness is due to the Company’s lack of working capital to hire additional staff.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving our objectives and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is a party to the following litigation:

Panos Industries, LLC v. Savoy Energy Corporation, et. al., District Court, Clark County, Nevada Case # A-10-612340-C.

On March 19, 2010, this action was filed in the above-entitled Court seeking damages “…in excess of $50,000” based upon monies which the Plaintiff claims were advanced by Plaintiff on behalf of the Company. As of this date, the Company has filed an Answer to the complaint and has filed a Cross-Complaint against the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Cross-Complaint, which is pending. While the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted, the Company specifically denies that it is indebted to Plaintiff and believes that any claims purportedly asserted in the lawsuit are without merit. The Company further believes that it has meritorious claims against Plaintiff which arose in connection with the merger of the Company’s predecessor (Arthur Kaplan Cosmetics, Inc.) with Plantation Exploration, Inc. and in connection with the aftermath of the merger. The Company intends to vigorously defend any claims asserted by the Plaintiff and to aggressively prosecute its claims against the Plaintiff. Even if the Company is ultimately successful in defending this action, it will incur legal fees and other expenses in connection with such defense, the amount of which cannot be predicted at this time. Such expenses could have a material impact on the Company’s future operating results and have an adverse impact on the Company’s funds available for its operations.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

None

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION

Date:	November 15, 2010

	By:	/s/ Arthur Bertagnolli
		Arthur Bertagnolli
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

Savoy Energy Corp Reports