Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - Sputnik Enterprises, Inc | v202249_ex31-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - Sputnik Enterprises, Inc | v202249_ex32-1.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30,
2010
oTRANSITION REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the
transition period from _____________________ to ______________
Commission
file number 333-126158
SPUTNIK
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
52-2348956
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
650 5th
Street, Suite 301
San
Francisco, CA 94107
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(415)
355-9500
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
x No
¨
As of
November 10, 2010 there were 295,286 shares issued and
outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.
INDEX
Page
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Unaudited
Financial Statements
|
3
|
Balance
Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Statements
of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, and from re-entering the development stage, February 29,
2008 to September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, and from re-entering the development stage, February 29, 2008 to
September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
|
9
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
|
10
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
10
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
11
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
11
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
12
|
Item
4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved).
|
12
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
12
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
12
|
Signatures
|
12
|
2
PART
I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial
Statements.
SPUTNIK
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE
SHEETS
(unaudited)
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Total
Current Assets
|
- | - | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Note
payable
|
25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Deficit
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 295,286 shares issued and
outstanding in both periods
|
295 | 295 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
1,953,290 | 1,943,601 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit from development stage
|
(65,722 | ) | (56,033 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
deficit from prior operations
|
(1,912,863 | ) | (1,912,863 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(25,000 | ) | (25,000 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | - | $ | - |
3
SPUTNIK
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Re-entering
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
Development
Stage to
September
|
||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative costs
|
1,982 | 1,705 | 8,190 | 5,599 | 62,222 | |||||||||||||||
Total
operating expense
|
1,982 | 1,705 | 8,190 | 5,599 | 62,222 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
Loss
|
(1,982 | ) | (1,705 | ) | (8,190 | ) | (5,599 | ) | (62,222 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
500 | 500 | 1,500 | 1,500 | 3,500 | |||||||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (2,482 | ) | $ | (2,205 | ) | $ | (9,690 | ) | $ | (7,099 | ) | $ | (65,722 | ) | |||||
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
$ | ( 0.01 | ) | $ | ( 0.01 | ) | $ | ( 0.03 | ) | $ | ( 0.02 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
295,286 | 295,286 | 295,286 | 295,286 |
See notes
to financial statements.
4
SPUTNIK
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
Re-entering
Development Stage
to September 30,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss from operations
|
$ | (9,690 | ) | $ | (7,099 | ) | $ | (65,722 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Imputed
interest on note payable
|
1,500 | 1,500 | 4,499 | |||||||||
Donated
capital
|
8,190 | 5,599 | 36,223 | |||||||||
Note
payable issued for legal expenses
|
- | - | 25,000 | |||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from advance from shareholder
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Net
change in cash
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
- | ||||||||||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
- | - | - |
5
SPUTNIK
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to
Financial Statements
(unaudited)
NOTE 1 -
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Sputnik Enterprises, Inc.
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and should be read in conjunction with Sputnik’s audited 2009 annual
financial statements and notes thereto filed with the SEC on form 10-K. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the
result of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected
herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the
financial statements, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure
required in Sputnik’s 2009 annual financial statements have been
omitted.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard issued by the FASB
related to the disclosure requirements of the fair value of the financial
instruments. This standard expands the disclosure requirements of fair value
(including the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value)
of certain financial instruments to interim period financial statements that
were previously only required to be disclosed in financial statements for annual
periods. In accordance with this standard, the disclosure requirements have been
applied on a prospective basis and did not have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
On
September 30, 2009, Sputnik adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) to the authoritative hierarchy of GAAP. These
changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as
the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements
in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue
Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not
be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the
Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change
GAAP. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is
referenced, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Financial
Statements.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In August
2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the
measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair
value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a
liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities
within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on
October 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the impact of its adoption to be
material to its financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related
to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables
including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and
undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard
eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement
considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to
each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual
deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific
objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the
undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to
determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in
applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the
timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is
currently assessing the impact, will become effective for the Company on January
1, 2011.
6
In
October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related
to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard
clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that
contain both software and non-software components that function together to
deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope
of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of
these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards
or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of
the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This
standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become
effective for the Company on January 1, 2011.
In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about
Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure
requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and
employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In
February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic
855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No.
2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate
subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and
removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and
revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent
events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position
and results of operations.
In
February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10),
“Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.” The
amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting
entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim
periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted.
The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material
effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In March
2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU2010-11), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):
Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” The amendments in this
Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the
beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this
Update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a
material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company.
NOTE 2 -
GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Sputnik will
continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements,
Sputnik suffered losses of $9,690 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and has an accumulated deficit of $1,978,585 at September 30, 2010. These
conditions raise substantial doubt as to Sputnik's ability to continue as a
going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might be necessary if Sputnik is unable to continue as a going
concern.
NOTE 3 –
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
Company is now considered a development stage enterprise pursuant to FASB
Literature, which focuses on development stage companies. Users of the financial
statements should be familiar with this Literature and its effect on the
financial statements.
NOTE 4 –
NOTE PAYABLE
On July
1, 2008, the Company issued a note in the amount of $25,000 to legal counsel,
Michael T. Williams, for legal expenses. The note is due on demand and has no
stated interest rate. Imputed interest in the amount of $500 is reflected as an
increase to additional paid-in capital for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and $1,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
7
As of
January 1, 2010, for additional consideration consisting of further legal
services, we agreed that the promissory note in the amount of $25,000 dated July
1, 2008 from us to Michael T. Williams can be converted on or after July 1, 2010
into common stock with such conversion terms and rights as may be agreed by the
parties in the future; provided, however, that the number of shares of common
stock to be issued upon conversion shall not exceed the total authorized but
unissued shares of common stock at the date of conversion and the conversion
price will not be below market price at the date of conversion.
NOTE 5–
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
There
were no subsequent events from the end of the quarter to the date of issuance of
this filing.
8
Item 2.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
This
10−Q contains forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ
materially from those set forth as a result of general economic conditions and
changes in the assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read together with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes and the other financial information appearing
else where in this report. The analysis set forth below is provided pursuant to
applicable Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and is not intended to
serve as a basis for projections of future events. Refer also to "Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements" and “Risk Factors”
below.
The
following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations as of
September 30, 2010 should be read in conjunction with our financial statements
and the related notes as provided under Item 1. With respect to the discussion
within this Item 2, the terms “Sputnik,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Sputnik
Enterprises, Inc.
Overview
Sputnik,
Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on September 27, 2001. On February
10, 2005, we filed Articles of Conversion and new Articles of Incorporation in
Nevada and became a Nevada corporation due to lower corporate filing
fees.
On
November 13, 2007, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Laika, Inc., and
transferred all of our assets and liabilities to Laika. On February 29, 2008, we
closed the sale of the stock of our wholly owned subsidiary, Laika, Inc. to
AstroChimp, Inc., leaving us as a shell company. We also changed our name to
Sputnik Enterprises on February 29, 2008.
Results of Operations for
the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009
Due to
the fact that we were a shell company in both periods, we had revenues of $0 for
the three months ended September 30, 2010, which was unchanged from our revenue
of $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Also related to our
continuing status as a shell company, our cost of goods sold and gross profits
were $0 in both periods.
Our net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $2,482, which was an
increase of $277 from our net loss of $2,205 in the three-month period ended
September 30, 2009. The increase is due to a difference in accounting expense
and is immaterial.
Results of Operations for
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
Due to
the fact that we were a shell company in both periods, we had revenues of $0 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, which was unchanged from our revenue
of $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Also related to our
continuing status as a shell company, our cost of goods sold and gross profits
were $0 in both periods.
Our net
loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $9,690, which was an
increase of $2,591 from our net loss of $7,099 in the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009. The increase is due to a difference in accounting expense
and is immaterial.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
On
February 29, 2008, we closed the sale of the stock of our wholly owned
subsidiary, Laika, Inc. to AstroChimp, Inc., leaving us as a shell
company. All expenses will be funded as an advance by our officers as
we have no assets, liabilities or source of revenues.
9
Cautionary
Note About Forward-Looking Statements
The
information contained in this Report includes some statements that are not
purely historical and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and as
such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements
relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which
we operate, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding our
mission and vision. In addition, any statements that refer to projections,
forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances,
including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. You can
generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words
“anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,”
“intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “predicts,”
“projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions, or the
negatives of such terms, but the absence of these words does not mean that a
statement is not forward-looking. For example, our forward-looking statements
may include statements regarding:
|
·
|
Our
projected sales and profitability,
|
|
·
|
Our
growth strategies,
|
|
·
|
Anticipated
trends in our industry,
|
|
·
|
Our
future financing plans, and
|
|
·
|
Our
anticipated needs for working
capital.
|
In light
of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the future events, developments
or results described by our forward-looking statements herein could turn to be
materially different from those we discuss or imply.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Not
applicable.
Item 4.
Controls and
Procedures.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act
(defined below)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our
internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
Nonetheless, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Accordingly, management
believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in
all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows for the periods presented and has concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level set forth
above.
10
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In
addition, our management with the participation of our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer have determined that no change in our
internal control over financial reporting occurred during or subsequent to the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is (as that
term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal
Proceedings.
None.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a)
|
Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities.
|
The
Registrant did not sell any unregistered securities during the three months
ended September 30, 2010.
(b)
|
Use of
Proceeds.
|
The
Registrant did not sell any unregistered securities during the three months
ended September 30, 2010.
11
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None.
Item
4. (Removed
and Reserved).
Item 5.
Other
Information.
Not
applicable.
Item 6.
Exhibits.
(a)
Exhibits.
Exhibit
|
Item
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
* This
exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language in any filings.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SPUTNIK ENTERPRISES,INC.
|
||
Date: November 12, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ David LaDuke
|
(Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)
|
12
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
|
Item
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
* This
exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
13