Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x      Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

o         Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from                  to                  

Commission File Number 001-33625

VIRTUSA CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

2000 West Park Drive

Westborough, Massachusetts 01581

(508) 389-7300

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,

Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s class of common stock, as of October 26, 2010:

Table of Contents

Virtusa Corporation and Subsidiaries

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Virtusa Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

Virtusa Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

Virtusa Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

Virtusa Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(1) Nature of Business

Virtusa Corporation (the “Company” or “Virtusa”) is a global information technology services company. The Company uses an offshore delivery model to provide a broad range of information technology, or IT, services, including IT consulting, technology implementation and application outsourcing. Using its enhanced global delivery model, innovative platforming approach and industry expertise, the Company provides cost-effective services that enable its clients to accelerate time to market, improve service and enhance productivity. Headquartered in Massachusetts, Virtusa has offices in the United States, the United Kingdom, Hungary and the Netherlands, and global delivery centers in Hyderabad, Chennai and Bangalore, India and Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(2) Unaudited Interim Financial Information

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Virtusa in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements (and notes thereto) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on May 27, 2010. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included, and all material adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected to occur for the entire fiscal year. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, Virtusa (India) Private Limited, Virtusa Consulting Services, Private Limited and Virtusa Software Services, Private Limited, each organized and located in India; Virtusa (Private) Limited, organized and located in Sri Lanka; Virtusa UK Limited, organized and located in the United Kingdom; Virtusa Securities Corporation, a Massachusetts securities corporation; InSource Holdings, Inc. incorporated and located in Connecticut; InSource LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company located in Connecticut; Virtusa International, B.V., organized and located in the Netherlands and Virtusa Hungary Kft., incorporated and located in Hungary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including the recoverability of tangible assets, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Management reevaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis. The most significant estimates relate to the recognition of revenue and profits based on the percentage of completion method of accounting for fixed-price contracts, share-based compensation, income taxes, including reserves for uncertain tax positions, deferred taxes and liabilities and intangible assets, contingent consideration and valuation of financial instruments including derivative contracts and investments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The actual amounts may vary from the estimates used in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which included cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued employee compensation and benefits, contingent consideration and other accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of the items. In addition, investment securities and derivative instruments are also financial instruments (see Note 6).

(3) Net Income per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, and diluted earnings per share is computed by including common stock equivalents outstanding for the period in the denominator. Unvested awards of share-based payments with non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities for purposes of calculating earnings per share. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods set forth below:

During the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, options to purchase 1,247,657 and 1,231,326 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

During the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, options to purchase 1,161,329 and 1,175,945 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

(4) Acquisitions

On November 4, 2009, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with InSource Holdings, Inc., a privately held Connecticut corporation (“InSource”) and its shareholders, to acquire all of the issued and outstanding stock of InSource and each of its subsidiaries (the “InSource Acquisition”). The Company completed the InSource Acquisition on November 4, 2009, and InSource is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The InSource Acquisition was consummated to expand Virtusa’s service offerings in the insurance and health care industries.

The InSource Acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the purchase price for the InSource Acquisition was $7,250 in cash, subject to post-closing adjustments. Ten percent (10%), or $725, of the purchase price was subject to a holdback by the Company for a period of 12 months as security for the sellers’ indemnification obligations under the Stock Purchase Agreement. This amount is included in short term restricted cash at September 30, 2010.

The purchase price was subject to adjustment after the closing for up to an additional $500 in earn-out consideration based on the achievement of certain revenue and operating margin targets for InSource’s calendar year and fourth quarter 2009.  At December 31, 2009, the Company determined that InSource met 100% of the performance targets.  The earn-out consideration was paid as of March 31, 2010.  The purchase price is also subject to an adjustment that would reimburse the InSource sellers if their tax burden from a specified tax election made by the Company exceeds $120. Upon the closing of the InSource Acquisition, the Company estimated the fair value of the purchase price adjustment related to this tax election to be $208. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company and InSource sellers agreed upon a final purchase price adjustment of $164 and the resulting decrease in fair value of the purchase price adjustment of $44 was recorded to goodwill.

7

Table of Contents

On February 1, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with ConVista Consulting LLC, a privately held Virginia limited liability corporation (“ConVista”), to acquire all of assets of ConVista (the “ConVista Acquisition”). The Company completed the ConVista Acquisition on February 1, 2010. The ConVista Acquisition was consummated to expand the Company’s enterprise service offerings.

The ConVista Acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the purchase price for the ConVista Acquisition was $24,846 in cash, subject to post-closing adjustments. Ten percent (10%), or $2,500, of the purchase price was subject to a holdback by the Company for a period of 12 months as security for the sellers’ indemnification obligations under the Asset Purchase Agreement. This amount is included in short term restricted cash at September 30, 2010.

The purchase price was subject to adjustment after the closing for up to an additional $2,000 in earn-out consideration based on the achievement of certain revenue and operating margin targets for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration upon the closing of ConVista Acquisition based on the probability of ConVista attaining the specified performance targets and assigned a fair value of $1,620 to the purchase price. As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the present value of the contingent consideration was $1,664 and $1,807 respectively. The change in the present value of $74 and $143 was recorded to selling, general and administration expenses during the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

The following unaudited, pro forma information assumes the InSource Acquisition and ConVista Acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma results of the acquisitions were combined as the InSource Acquisition was not material to the consolidated financial results.

(1)          Pro forma net income for the three and six  months ended September 30, 2009 does not include amortization expense or acquisition related bonuses.

Intangible Assets

The following are details of the Company’s intangible asset carrying amounts acquired as a result of the InSource and ConVista acquisitions, at September 30, 2010 and accumulated amortization at September 30, 2010:

The components included in the gross carrying amounts at September 30, 2010 reflect the consummation of the InSource Acquisition on November 4, 2009, and the ConVista Acquisition on February 1, 2010.  The intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.

Goodwill:

The Company has one reportable segment at September 30, 2010. The following are details of the changes in goodwill balance at September 30, 2010:

8

Table of Contents

The goodwill balance is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The Company performed the annual assessment of its goodwill during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, and determined that the estimated fair value of its reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and therefore goodwill was not impaired. The Company evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of its long lived assets, including intangible assets, may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. There was no indication of impairment during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

(5) Investment Securities

At September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, all of the Company’s investment securities were classified as available-for-sale or trading and were carried on its balance sheet at their fair market value. A fair market value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs was used to measure each security (see Note 6).

The following is a summary of investment securities at September 30, 2010:

The following is a summary of investment securities at March 31, 2010:

9

Table of Contents

The Company evaluates investments with unrealized losses to determine if the losses are other than temporary. The Company has determined that the gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 are temporary. In making this determination, the Company considered the financial condition, credit ratings and near-term prospects of the issuers, the underlying collateral of the investments, and the magnitude of the losses as compared to the cost and the length of time the investments have been in an unrealized loss position. Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell such investments, and it is more likely than not the Company will not be required to sell such investments prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis, except as disclosed in Note 6.

(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company uses a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflected in the consolidated financial statements at carrying value include marketable securities and other financial instruments which approximate fair value. Fair value for marketable securities is determined using a market approach based on quoted market prices at period end in active markets. The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

·                  Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

·                  Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

·                  Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

An entity is allowed to elect to record financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition on a contract-by-contract basis. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, the Company elected the fair value option to account for the Put Option (as defined and described in this Note 6 below) related to certain of the Company’s auction-rate securities.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2010:

In November 2008, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with UBS AG, the investment firm that had sold the Company auction-rate securities at a par value of $6,675. Under the Agreement, the Company (1) received the right to sell

10

Table of Contents

(the “Put Option”) these auction-rate securities back to the investment firm at par, at the Company’s sole discretion, any time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012, and (2) provided the investment firm the right to purchase these auction-rate securities or sell these securities on the Company’s behalf at par any time after the execution of the Agreement through July 2, 2012. During the six months ended September 30, 2010, the Company sold certain auction rate securities, subject to the Put Option under the Agreement, in the amount of $6,675 at par value.

The Company’s investments in auction-rate securities and the related Put Option were classified within Level 3 because there were currently no active markets or observable market prices. Therefore, the auction-rate securities and related Put Option were valued primarily based on an income approach using an estimate of future cash flows. The Company had estimated the fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis which considered the following key inputs: (i) the underlying structure and maturity of each security; (ii) the timing of expected future principal and interest payments; and (iii) discount rates that are believed to reflect current market conditions and the relevant risk associated with each security.

Level 3 assets as listed in the table above include auction-rate securities whose underlying assets are generally student loans which are substantially backed by the U.S. federal government. In February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail and each auction since then has continued to fail. The Company classifies its investment in auction-rate securities as long-term investments, reflecting the fact that the Company’s auction-rate securities have underlying final maturities of greater than one year and based on the Company’s intent and ability to hold the securities until final maturity. These investments were recorded at fair value at September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets at September 30, 2010:

During the six months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a gain on the sale of certain auction-rate securities, which was fully offset by the loss recognized on the Put Option.

The Company determines the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the ConVista Acquisition based on the probability of ConVista attaining certain revenue and operating margin targets for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as at September 30, 2010:

(7) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its foreign exchange policy on an ongoing basis to assess its ability to address foreign exchange exposures on its consolidated balance sheets, statements of income and consolidated statement of cash flows from all foreign currencies, including most significantly, the U.K. pound sterling, Indian rupee and Sri Lankan rupee. The Company enters into hedging contracts in accordance with its foreign exchange policy (as approved by the Company’s audit committee and board of directors) which permits hedging of material, known foreign currency exposures. Currently, the Company maintains three hedging programs, each with varying contract types, duration and purposes. The Company’s “Cash Flow Program” is designed to mitigate the impact of volatility in the U.S. dollar equivalent of the Company’s Indian rupee denominated expenses over a rolling 24 month period. The Cash Flow Program transactions currently meet the criteria for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges. The Company’s “Balance Sheet Program” involves the use of 30-day derivative instruments designed to mitigate the monthly impact of foreign exchange gains/losses on certain intercompany balances. The Company’s “U.K. Revenue and Cost Program” involves the purchase of derivative instruments with maturities of up to 90 days designed to mitigate the impact of foreign exchange movement on U.K. pound sterling denominated revenue and costs. The Balance Sheet Program and the U.K. Revenue and Cost Program currently do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting and all changes in the fair value of the derivatives purchased under these programs are recognized in the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

11

Table of Contents

Changes in fair value of the designated cash flow hedges for our Cash Flow Program are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), net of tax, until the forecasted hedged transactions occur and are then recognized in the consolidated statement of income. The Company evaluates hedge effectiveness at the inception of each contract, as well as on an ongoing basis. If and when hedge relationships are discontinued because the forecasted transaction is deemed probable of not occurring by the end of the originally specified period, or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, any unrealized gains or losses recorded in AOCI are reclassified to earnings. There were no gains (losses) that were reclassified from AOCI into earnings as a result of forecasted transactions that were considered probable of not occurring for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

Changes in the fair value for all other derivative contracts and the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges, if any, are recognized in the same line item as the underlying exposure being hedged or in foreign currency transaction gain or loss for the Balance Sheet Program. The Company values its derivatives based on market observable inputs including both forward and spot prices for currencies. Any significant change in the forward or spot prices for hedged currencies would have a significant impact on the value of the Company’s derivatives.

The U.S. dollar notional equivalent market value, which consists of the notional value and net unrealized gain or loss, of all outstanding foreign currency derivative contracts, was $45,360 and $43,173, at September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Unrealized net gains related to these contracts which are expected to be reclassified from AOCI to earnings during the next 12 months are $1,363 at September 30, 2010. At September 30, 2010, the maximum outstanding term of any derivative instrument was 21 months.

The following tables set forth the fair value of derivative instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010:

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

The following tables set forth the effect of the Company’s foreign currency exchange contracts on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

12

Table of Contents

(8) Income Taxes

Including discrete items, the Company’s effective tax rate was 7.7% and 7.1% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to an effective tax rate of 10.8% and 11.1% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to tax benefits related to the reversal of certain tax reserves, prior years’ refund claims as well as  the geographic mix of the Company’s forecasted taxable profit partially offset by the expiration of the Hyderabad STP holiday (discussed below). The effective income tax rate is based on the estimated composition of income in different jurisdictions for the fiscal year and adjustments, if any, in the unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain income tax positions.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, the Company reduced the amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to its uncertain tax positions in the United Kingdom and India by $56 and $312, respectively due to lapse in statutory limits and settlements agreed to for pending appeals, respectively.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2010, the Company finalized its estimates of prior years’ refunds to be filed for research and development deductions and recognized a $269 tax benefit.

No other events, other than those noted above, occurred since March 31, 2010 that the Company believes would have a material effect on the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to its uncertain income tax positions.

The Company’s Indian subsidiaries are export-oriented companies under the Indian Income Tax Act of 1961 and are entitled to claim tax exemption for a period of ten consecutive years for export profits related to each Software Technology Park, or STP, which they operate. The Company’s Indian subsidiaries currently operate two STPs, one in Chennai and one in Hyderabad. The STP holiday for the Hyderabad unit expired on March 31, 2010 and the STP holiday for Chennai is set to expire on March 2011. When the holiday ends, the taxable profit is taxed at the full statutory rate, currently 33.22%. The Company’s Indian subsidiaries also operate two development centers in areas designated as a Special Economic Zone, or SEZ, under the SEZ Act of 2005. The Company’s profits from the Hyderabad and Chennai SEZ operations are eligible for certain income tax exemptions for a period of up to 15 years beginning in fiscal 2010. In addition, the Company was also approved as an SEZ Co-developer and is building a campus on a 6.3 acre parcel of land in Hyderabad, India that has been designated as an SEZ. As an SEZ co-developer, the Company is also entitled to certain tax benefits for any consecutive period of 10 years during the 15 year period starting in fiscal year March 2009. The Company has not yet claimed any SEZ co-developer income tax benefits. In addition, the Company has leased facilities in an SEZ designated location in Chennai, India.

The Company’s Sri Lankan subsidiary, referred to as Virtusa SL, was approved as an export computer software developer by the Sri Lanka Board of Investment in 1998 and has negotiated multiple extensions of the original holiday period in exchange for further capital investments in Sri Lanka facilities. The most recent 12-year agreement, which is set to expire on March 31, 2019, requires that the Company meet certain new job creation and investment criteria in Sri Lanka. The current agreement provides income tax exemption for all business income.

13

Table of Contents

(9) Concentration of Revenue and Assets

Total revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on location of the client. Net assets represent total assets less total liabilities and are attributed to geographic area based on their location. Geographic information is summarized as follows:

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, revenue from two significant clients accounted for 14.8% and 11.3% respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. During the six months ended September 30, 2010, revenue from two significant clients accounted for 14.7% and 10.8% respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, revenue from four significant clients accounted for 17.1%, 12.6%, 11.5% and 10.4% respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, revenue from these four clients represented 15.5%, 13.6%, 12.0% and 10.7% respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue.

(10) Treasury Stock

On August 5, 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved a stock repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $15,000 of shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock on or prior to August 5, 2010, subject to certain price and other trading restrictions. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock under this program.  The stock repurchase program expired on August 5, 2010.

(11) Debt

On July 30, 2010, the Company entered into a new $3,000 credit agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPM”) which expires on July 31, 2013. The primary purpose of the new credit agreement is to support the Company’s foreign currency hedging programs. The credit agreement is secured by a grant of a security interest in the Company’s U.S. assets in favor of JPM as well as other collateral. The agreement contains financial and reporting covenants and limitations. The Company is currently in compliance with all covenants contained in its credit facility and believes that the credit facility provides sufficient flexibility so that it will remain in compliance with its terms. In connection with the execution of the new credit facility, the Company terminated its existing $3,000 amended and restated line of credit agreement with RBS Citizens, N.A. and JPM.

Beginning in fiscal 2009, the Company’s U.K. subsidiary entered into an agreement with a financial institution to sell, without recourse, certain of its Europe-based accounts receivable balances to such financial institution. During the six months ended September 30, 2010, $9,446 of receivables were sold under the terms of the financing agreement. Fees paid pursuant to this agreement were immaterial during the six-months ended September 30, 2010. No amounts were outstanding under the financing agreement at September 30, 2010, but the Company may elect to use this program again in future periods. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances that this or any other financing facilities will be available or used in the future.

(12) Subsequent Events

On October 1, 2010, the Company purchased multiple foreign currency forward contracts designed to hedge fluctuation in the U.K. pound sterling against the U.S. dollar. The contracts have an aggregate notional amount of approximately £2,235 and will expire on various dates during the period ending December 30, 2010. The weighted average U.K. pound sterling settlement rate associated with these contracts is approximately $1.57.

On October 21, 2010, the Company purchased multiple foreign currency forward contracts designed to hedge fluctuation in the Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling and to minimize volatility in Indian rupee denominated expenses. The U.S dollar contracts have an aggregate notional amount of approximately 436,609 Indian rupees (approximately $9,566) and an average settlement rate of 45.64 Indian rupees per U.S. dollar. The U.K. pound sterling contracts have an aggregate notional amount of approximately 229,080 Indian rupees (approximately £3,215) and have an average settlement rate of 71.26 Indian rupees per U.K. pound sterling. These contracts will expire at various dates during the period ending on September 30, 2012. Upon expiration, the

14

Table of Contents

Company will be obligated to settle these contracts based upon the Reserve Bank of India published Indian rupee exchange rates. Based on the U.S. dollar to U.K. pound sterling spot rate on October 21, 2010 of $1.58, the blended weighted average Indian rupee rate associated with both the U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling contracts would be approximately 45.48 Indian rupees per U.S. dollar. Such blended, weighted average Indian rupee rate is subject to change, to the extent of any appreciation or depreciation in the U.K. pound sterling against the U.S. dollar, as compared to the spot rate listed above. Because these foreign currency forward contracts are designed to reduce volatility in the Indian rupee exchange rates, on the Company’s Indian rupee denominated expenses they not only reduce the negative impact of a stronger Indian rupee but also reduce the positive impact of a weaker Indian rupee.

15

Table of Contents

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of Virtusa Corporation should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Forward looking statements

The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements (within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements, such as statements regarding anticipated future revenue, contract percentage completions, capital expenditures, management’s plans and objectives and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts, involve predictions. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those factors set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010. We urge you to consider those risks and uncertainties in evaluating our forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Business overview

Virtusa Corporation (the “Company”, “Virtusa”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a global information technology services company. We use an offshore delivery model to provide a broad range of information technology (“IT”) services, including IT consulting, technology implementation and application outsourcing. Using our enhanced global delivery model, innovative platforming approach and industry expertise, we provide cost-effective services that enable our clients to use IT to enhance business performance, accelerate time-to-market, increase productivity and improve customer experience. Headquartered in Massachusetts, we have offices in the United States, United Kingdom, Hungary and the Netherlands and global delivery centers in Hyderabad, Chennai, and Bangalore, India and Colombo, Sri Lanka.  At September 30, 2010, we had 4,522 employees, or team members.

In our three months ended September 30, 2010, our revenue increased by 40.5% to $52.7 million, compared to $37.5 million in our three months ended September 30, 2009. In our six months ended September 30, 2010, our revenue increased by 39.0% to $104.1 million, compared to $74.9 million in our six months ended September 30, 2009.

Net income increased by 24.4%, or $0.7 million, to $3.7 million in our three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $3.0 million in our three months ended September 30, 2009. Net income increased by 20.6%, or $1.2 million, to $6.8 million in our six months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $5.6 million in our six months ended September 30, 2009.

The increase in revenue for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, primarily resulted from:

·                  Higher revenue contribution from our clients existing as of September 30, 2009, including our largest client; and

·                  Revenue from clients obtained in connection with the acquisition of InSource LLC (“InSource”) in November 2009 and ConVista Consulting LLC (“ConVista”) in February 2010.

The key drivers of the increase in our net income for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, were as follows:

·                  Higher revenue contribution from new and existing clients, including those clients acquired in the recent acquisitions;

·                  Decreased operating expenses as a percentage of revenue due to our ability to leverage operating efficiencies over a larger revenue base; and

16

Table of Contents

·                  Foreign exchange gains due to changes in the U.K. pound sterling and Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar, driven primarily by our hedging program.

These increases were partially offset by:

·                  Annual compensation increases effective April 1, 2010;

·                  Increase in expense related to use of subcontractors to satisfy demand for new project starts; and

·                  Acquisition related amortization expense and retention bonuses resulting from our acquisitions of InSource and ConVista.

High repeat business and client concentration are common in our industry. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, 77% of our revenue was derived from clients who had been using our services for more than one year (91% when excluding revenue from clients recently acquired as a result of the InSource and ConVista acquisitions), as compared to 90% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. During the six months ended September 30, 2010, 77% of our revenue was derived from clients who had been using our services for more than one year (93% when excluding revenue from those clients recently acquired as a result of the InSource and ConVista acquisitions), as compared to 92% for the six months ended September 30, 2009. Accordingly, our global account management and service delivery teams focus on expanding client relationships and converting new engagements to long-term relationships to generate repeat revenue and expand revenue streams from existing clients.

We also have a dedicated business development team focused on generating engagements with new clients to expand our client base and, over time, reduce client concentration. In the three months ended September 30, 2010, recent client additions and expansions, including business acquired from InSource and ConVista, have comprised a larger percent of our total revenue as compared to three months ended September 30, 2009.

In the three months ended September 30, 2010, our European revenue increased 14.4%, or  $1.4 million, to $10.9 million, or 20.7% of total revenue, from $9.6 million, or 25.5% of total revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2009. In the six months ended September 30, 2010, our European revenue increased 23.1%, or $4.1 million, to $21.6 million, or 20.8% of total revenue, from $17.6 million, or 23.5% of total revenue, in the six months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is primarily due to the increase in revenue from one of our largest clients, British Telecommunications plc (“British Telecom”), in the three and six month period ended September 30, 2010, by 21.9% and 31.8% as compared to three and six month period ended September 30, 2009. Our European revenue, excluding British Telecom, was relatively unchanged for the three month period ended September 30, 2010, but increased 6.1% for the six months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three and six months ended September 30, 2009.

Our gross profit increased by $4.0 million, or 24.2%, to $20.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $16.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2009. Our gross profit increased by $7.0 million, or 21.2%, to $39.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $32.9 million in the six months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in gross profit during the six months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2009, was primarily due to higher revenue, partially offset by increased cost of revenue which includes annual compensation increases and higher subcontractor expenses.

We derive our revenue from two types of service offerings; application outsourcing, which is recurring in nature, and consulting, including technology implementation, which is non-recurring in nature.  During the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, our application outsourcing and consulting revenue represented 47% and 53%, respectively, of our total revenue. We perform our services under both time-and-materials and fixed-price contracts. Revenue from fixed-price contracts represented 18% and 19% of total revenue in the three and six months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to 16% and 17% of total revenue for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The increased revenue earned from fixed-price contracts in the three and six months ended September 30, 2010 primarily reflects our client preferences and revenue from new clients acquired in the ConVista acquisition.

As an IT services company, our revenue growth is highly dependent on our ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain skilled IT professionals. We monitor our overall attrition rates and patterns to align our people management strategy with our growth objectives. At September 30, 2010, our attrition rate for the trailing twelve months, which reflects voluntary and involuntary attrition, was 27.7%. These attrition rates reflect a higher rate of voluntary and involuntary attrition as compared to prior periods and reflects increased volatility as regional and global economic conditions improve. We remain committed to improving our attrition levels. There remains intense competition for IT professionals with the specific domain skills necessary to provide the type of services we offer. If our attrition rate increases or is sustained at higher levels, our growth may slow and our cost of attracting and retaining IT professionals could increase.

17

Table of Contents

We engage in a foreign currency hedging strategy using foreign currency forward contracts designed to hedge fluctuation in the Indian Rupee and Sri Lankan Rupee against the U.S. dollar and U.K. pound sterling, as well as the U.K. pound sterling against the U.S. dollar, to reduce the effect of change in these foreign currency exchange rate changes on our foreign operations and intercompany balances. There is no assurance that these hedging programs or hedging contracts will be effective. Because these foreign currency forward contracts are designed to reduce volatility in the Indian rupee and U.K. pound sterling exchange rates, they not only reduce the negative impact of a stronger Indian rupee and weaker U.K. pound sterling but also could reduce the positive impact of a weaker Indian rupee and stronger U.K. pound sterling on our Indian rupee expenses and U.K. pound sterling denominated revenue and expenses. In addition, to the extent that these hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting, we may have to recognize gains or losses on the aggregate amount of hedges placed earlier and in larger amounts than expected.

We are entitled to claim tax exemption for a period of ten consecutive years for export profits related to each Software Technology Park, or STP, which we operate. The STP holiday for the Hyderabad unit expired on March 31, 2010 and the STP holiday for our Chennai unit is set to expire on March 31, 2011. When the Chennai holiday ends, the taxable profit will be taxed at the full statutory rate, currently 33.22%. As a result of the expiration, our effective tax rate will increase.

Application of critical accounting estimates and risks

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, in particular those related to revenue recognition, income taxes, valuation of financial instruments and share-based compensation. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates. Our management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Additional information about these critical accounting policies may be found in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC.

Results of operations

Three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009

The following table presents an overview of our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.