Attached files
Exhibit
13
Annual
Report to Stockholders
First
Bancshares, Inc.
2010
Annual Report
First
Home Savings Bank
A
wholly owned subsidiary
of First Bancshares, Inc.
www.fhsb.com
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|
Letter
to Shareholders
|
1
|
Business
of the Company
|
3
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Information
|
4
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|
and
Results of Operations
|
6
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
27
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
28
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
33
|
Common
Stock Information
|
66
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
67
|
Corporate
Information
|
68
|
Letter To
Shareholders
Dear
Shareholders:
As we
anticipated, our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 proved to be another
challenging year for First Bancshares, the financial institutions industry in
general, and for the nation overall, as we continued to work our way through
these unprecedented economic conditions. Throughout the year, a
record number of financial institutions were placed into receivership by federal
and state regulatory agencies and acquired by stronger
institutions. In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act was enacted by Congress. This new
law will significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and affect
the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial
institutions and their holding companies.
During
the year ended June 30, 2010, we continued to take action to comply with the
terms of the Cease and Desist Order First Home and First Bancshares entered into
with our primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, on August
17, 2009. We believe that as of June 30, 2010, we were in substantial
compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order and First Home was
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action
First
Bancshares had a net loss of $1.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2010,
compared to a net loss of $4.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. We are disappointed with our results for fiscal 2010 and there
remains a great deal of work to be done to return the Savings Bank and the
Company to profitability. Asset quality remains our primary concern and
continues to affect our financial performance. Non-performing loans increased by
$615,000, or 18.6%, to $3.9 million at June 30, 2010 from $3.3 million at June
30, 2009. We believe that our performance will improve considerably
after we resolve our asset quality issues. Another significant issue facing the
Company is the current structure of market interest rates and the economy in
general. Fewer businesses and individuals are looking to borrow money which,
along with our efforts to resolve asset quality issues, has resulted in a
substantial shrinkage in our loan portfolio. The results of the shrinkage
include a narrowing of interest rate spreads and a reduction in net interest
income.
Recognizing
these challenges that remain to be addressed, our focus will continue to be
improving the overall performance and earnings of First Bancshares through the
implementation of the following strategies:
· Improving
credit quality;
· Managing
capital and liquidity;
· Attracting
and building core banking relationships;
· Deepening
customer relationships;
· Establishing
better loan and deposit pricing; and
· Improving
efficiency and expense management.
1
We are
committed to taking the necessary actions in fiscal 2011 to assure the Company’s
strong foundation and future growth opportunities which we anticipate will
develop once the operating environment improves. We must not forget
that the strength of our franchise is inextricably linked to the customers we
have served in Mountain Grove (and surrounding communities) since 1911 when
First Home was founded. Those customer relationships developed over
these many years will survive the current environment and provide the impetus
for future growth. In the near-term, however, we will continue to
implement our strategy to improve First Bancshares’ earnings and to satisfy the
constituencies we serve: depositors, borrowers, shareholders, employees and
regulators.
Thank you
for your continued support during these difficult times, and I look forward to
building our future success together.
/s/Lannie E. Crawford
Lannie E.
Crawford
President
2
Business
of the Company
First
Bancshares, Inc. (“Company”), a Missouri corporation, was incorporated on
September 30, 1993 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for First
Home Savings Bank (“First Home” or the “Savings Bank”) upon the conversion of
First Home from a Missouri mutual to a Missouri stock savings and loan
association. That conversion was completed on December 22,
1993. At June 30, 2010, the Company had total consolidated assets of
$211.7 million and consolidated stockholders’ equity of $22.6
million.
The
Company is not engaged in any significant business activity other than holding
the stock of First Home. Accordingly, the information set forth in
this report, including the consolidated financial statements and related data,
applies primarily to First Home.
First Home is a Missouri-chartered, federally-insured stock savings bank organized in 1911. The Savings Bank is regulated by the Missouri Division of Finance and the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). New financial reform legislation, entitled the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has, however, recently been enacted by Congress that will change the banking regulatory framework and create an independent consumer protection bureau that will assume the consumer protection responsibilities of the various federal banking agencies. First Home’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. First Home also is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) System.
First
Home conducts its business from its home office in Mountain Grove and ten full
service branch facilities in Marshfield, Ava, Gainesville, Sparta, Theodosia,
Crane, Galena, Kissee Mills, Rockaway Beach, and Springfield, Missouri. First
Home provides its customers with a full array of community banking services and
is primarily engaged in the business of attracting deposits from, and making
loans to, the general public, including individuals and small to medium size
businesses. First Home originates real estate loans, including
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, multi-family residential loans,
commercial real estate loans and home equity loans, as well as, non-real estate
loans, including commercial business loans and consumer loans. First
Home also invests in mortgage-backed securities, United States Government and
agency securities and other assets.
At June
30, 2010, First Home’s total gross loans were $111.0 million, or 52.4% of total
consolidated assets, including residential first mortgage loans of $60.2
million, or 54.3% of total gross loans and other mortgage loans, secured by
commercial properties, land and multi-family properties, of $43.4
million, or 39.1% of total gross loans. Of the gross mortgage loans,
over 65.5% are adjustable-rate loans.
3
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The
following table sets forth certain information concerning the consolidated
financial position and operating results
of the Company as of and for the dates indicated. The Company is
primarily in the business of directing, planning
and coordinating the business activities of First Home. The
consolidated data is derived in part from, and
should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company and its subsidiaries presented
herein.
At
June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||
FINANCIAL
CONDITION DATA:
|
|||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
211,657
|
$
|
229,915
|
$
|
249,232
|
$
|
241,331
|
$
|
228,395
|
|
Loans
receivable, net
|
108,683
|
133,162
|
167,035
|
158,993
|
141,987
|
||||||
Cash,
interest-bearing deposits
|
|||||||||||
and
securities
|
90,156
|
81,335
|
64,195
|
65,498
|
69,007
|
||||||
Deposits
|
180,075
|
189,218
|
194,593
|
190,090
|
179,141
|
||||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
5,352
|
5,713
|
4,648
|
2,103
|
-
|
||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
3,000
|
10,000
|
22,000
|
22,000
|
22,000
|
||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
22,611
|
23,764
|
27,100
|
26,468
|
26,291
|
||||||
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(In
thousands, except per share information)
|
|||||||||||
OPERATING
DATA:
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
9,777
|
$
|
12,366
|
$
|
14,828
|
$
|
13,724
|
$
|
12,913
|
|
Interest
expense
|
3,266
|
5,443
|
7,451
|
7,354
|
5,987
|
||||||
Net
interest income
|
6,511
|
6,923
|
7,377
|
6,370
|
6,926
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
852
|
5,314
|
1,291
|
426
|
1,520
|
||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
|||||||||||
for
loan losses
|
5,659
|
1,609
|
6,086
|
5,944
|
5,406
|
||||||
Impairment
of and gains/(losses) on
securities
|
-
|
143
|
-
|
177
|
(421)
|
||||||
Non-interest
income, excluding
|
|||||||||||
gains
(losses) on securities
|
1,535
|
2,514
|
2,903
|
2,127
|
1,902
|
||||||
Non-interest
expense
|
7,637
|
9,834
|
8,557
|
8,094
|
7,151
|
||||||
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
(443)
|
(5,568)
|
432
|
154
|
(264)
|
||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
1,041
|
(1,532)
|
69
|
(118)
|
(91)
|
||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(1,484)
|
$
|
(4,036)
|
$
|
363
|
$
|
272
|
$
|
(173)
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
(0.96)
|
$
|
(2.60)
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.18
|
$
|
(0.11)
|
|
$
|
(0.96)
|
$
|
(2.60)
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.18
|
$
|
(0.11)
|
||
Dividends
per share
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
0.16
|
4
At
or For the Years Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
KEY
OPERATING RATIOS:
|
|||||||||||||
Return
on average assets
|
N/A
|
%
|
N/A
|
%
|
0.15
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
N/A
|
%
|
|||
Return
on average equity
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1.34
|
0.77
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Average
equity to average assets
|
11.07
|
10.70
|
11.05
|
11.32
|
11.52
|
||||||||
Interest
rate spread for period
|
3.11
|
2.94
|
3.01
|
2.71
|
2.96
|
||||||||
Net
interest margin for period
|
3.28
|
3.16
|
3.30
|
3.01
|
3.21
|
||||||||
Non-interest
expense to average
assets
|
3.52
|
4.00
|
3.49
|
3.46
|
2.88
|
||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets to
|
|||||||||||||
interest-bearing
liabilities
|
109.81
|
108.87
|
108.95
|
108.66
|
108.98
|
||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans
|
|||||||||||||
at
end of period
|
2.28
|
3.05
|
1.65
|
1.59
|
1.67
|
||||||||
Net
charge-offs to average loans
|
|||||||||||||
outstanding
during the period
|
2.21
|
2.63
|
0.74
|
0.14
|
1.29
|
||||||||
Ratio
of non-performing assets to total
assets
|
6.19
|
5.23
|
1.56
|
1.47
|
2.21
|
||||||||
Ratio
of loan loss allowance to
|
|||||||||||||
non-performing
assets
|
30.13
|
83.40
|
72.10
|
79.08
|
184.52
|
||||||||
Dividend
payout ratio
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
-
|
44.44
|
N/A
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||
OTHER
DATA:
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||
Number
of:
|
|||||||||||||
Loans
outstanding
|
2,370
|
2,802
|
3,388
|
3,450
|
3,644
|
||||||||
Deposit
accounts
|
20,163
|
21,965
|
23,221
|
23,983
|
24,724
|
||||||||
Full
service offices
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
10
|
||||||||
|
5
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. The information contained in this section
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, the
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the other sections
contained in this report.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Annual Report contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of words such as "believe," "expect,"
"anticipate," "intend," "should," "plan," "project," "estimate," "potential,"
"seek," "strive," or "try" or other conditional verbs such as "will," "would,"
"should," "could," or "may" or similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the business
environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived
opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements
regarding our strategies. Our ability to predict results or the actual effects
of our plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that our
plans, intentions and expectations, as reflected in these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these plans, intentions
or expectations will be achieved or realized. Our actual results, performance,
or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or
implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of
factors including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities,
including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs
that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate
markets and may lead to increased losses and non-performing assets in our loan
portfolio, resulting in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to
cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our reserves; changes
in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas;
changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences
between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net
interest margin and funding sources; deposit flows; fluctuations in the demand
for loans, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in
real estate values in our market areas; adverse changes in the securities
markets; results of examinations of us by the OTS, the Missouri Division of
Finance (“Division”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") or
other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory
authority may, among other things, require us to increase our reserve for loan
losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our
ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely
affect our liquidity and earnings; the possibility that we will be unable to
comply with the conditions imposed upon us by the Order to Cease and Desist
issued by the OTS, including but not limited to our ability to reduce our
non-performing assets, which could result in the imposition of additional
restrictions on our operations; our ability to control operating costs and
expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our
assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant
declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans
on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the
implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential
associated charges; computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience
a security breach, or the implementation of new technologies may not be
successful; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; our ability to retain
key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation,
including settlements and judgments; increased competitive pressures among
financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and
savings habits; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business including the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act changes in regulatory
polices and principles, including the interpretation of regulatory capital or
other rules; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or
regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the
securities markets; the inability of key third-party providers to perform
6
their
obligations to us; changes in accounting policies, principles and practices, as
may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on
accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods;
the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic,
competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our
operations; pricing, products and services; our ability to lease excess space in
Company-owned buildings; and other risks detailed in this Annual Report. Any of
the forward-looking statements that we make in this Annual Report and in the
other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of the
inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above
or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Additionally, the timing and
occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond
our control. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any
obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of
anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such
statements. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us, and
could negatively affect the Company's operating and stock
performance.
As used
throughout this report, the terms "we", "our", or "us" refer to First
Bancshares, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiary, First Home Savings
Bank.
Recent
Developments and Corporate Overview
Economic
Conditions
The
economic decline that began in calendar 2008 and that has continued to varying
degrees into calendar 2010 has created significant challenges for financial
institutions such as First Home Savings Bank. Dramatic declines in
the housing market, marked by falling home prices and increasing levels of
mortgage foreclosures, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values
by many financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and
major commercial and investment banks. In addition, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases ceased to provide,
funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions, as a result of
concern about the stability of the financial markets and the strength of
counterparties. While the economy has recently shown some small signs of
improvement, no upward trend seems to have been established.
TARP
In
response to the crises affecting the U.S. banking system and financial markets
and attempts to bolster the distressed economy and improve consumer confidence
in the financial system, on October 3, 2008, the U.S. Congress passed, and the
President signed into law, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
(“EESA”). The EESA authorizes the U.S. Treasury Department to
purchase from financial institutions and their holding companies up to $700
billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other
financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial
institutions and their holding companies in a troubled asset relief program
(“TARP”). The purpose of TARP is to restore confidence and stability
to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase
their lending to customers and to each other. Under the TARP Capital
Purchase Program (“CPP”), the Treasury may purchase debt or equity securities
from participating institutions. The TARP also allows direct
purchases or guarantees of troubled assets of financial
institutions. Participants in the CPP are subject to executive
compensation limits and are encouraged to expand their lending and mortgage loan
modifications. First Bancshares elected not to participate in
TARP.
7
New
Federal Legislation
Congress
has recently enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act which will significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and
affect the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial
institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will
eliminate our current primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, and will require First Home Savings Bank to be regulated by the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for
national banks) and the Missouri Division of Finance. The Dodd-Frank
Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to
supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like First
Bancshares, Inc., in addition to bank holding companies which it currently
regulates. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board’s current
regulations applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company
capital requirements, will apply to savings and loan holding companies like
First Bancshares, Inc. These capital requirements are substantially
similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to the Savings
Bank. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve Board to
set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as
those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of
Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments that are currently
considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository
institutions. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500
million are exempt from these capital requirements. Under the
Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded from
Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank
or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of
assets. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of
insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in
effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new
leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account
off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to
securitized products and derivatives.
The
Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with
broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide
range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings
institutions such as the Bank, including the authority to prohibit “unfair,
deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and
savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and
savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by
their applicable bank regulators, in the Savings Bank’s case, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency.
The
legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average
consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial
institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit
unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and
non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance
through December 31, 2013. Additionally, effective July 6, 2010,
regulatory changes in overdraft and interchange fee restrictions may reduce our
noninterest income. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give
stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden
parachute” payments, and authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to
promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates
using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the
Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation
paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is
publicly traded or not.
8
Federal
Deposit Insurance
The
Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for
banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor,
retroactive to January 1, 2009. Non-interest bearing transaction
accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31,
2013.
Pursuant
to the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is authorized to set the reserve ratio for
the Deposit Insurance Fund annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of estimated
insured deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that the statutory minimum reserve
ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund increase from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured
deposits by September 30, 2020. Banks with assets of less than $10
billion, such as First Home Savings Bank, are exempt from any additional
assessments necessary to increase the reserve fund above 1.15%.
As part
of a plan to restore the reserve ratio to 1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation imposed a special assessment equal to five basis points of assets
less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was payable on September 30,
2009. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
increased its quarterly deposit insurance assessment rates and amended the
method by which rates are calculated. Beginning in the second quarter
of 2009, institutions are assigned an initial base assessment rate ranging from
12 to 45 basis points of deposits depending on risk category. The initial base
assessment is then adjusted based upon the level of unsecured debt, secured
liabilities, and brokered deposits to establish a total base assessment rate
ranging from seven to 77.5 basis points.
On
November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final
rule requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009,
their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009,
and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for
the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 are based upon the assessment
rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011
and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth in the
assessment base is assumed. Prepaid assessments are to be applied
against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not be applied
to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused
prepayments will be returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On
December 30, 2009, we prepaid $1.6 million in estimated assessment fees for the
fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012. Because the prepaid assessments
represent the prepayment of future expense, they do not affect our tax
obligations or regulatory capital (the prepaid asset will have a risk-weighting
of 0%).
The
preceding is a summary of recently enacted laws and regulations that could
materially impact our results of operations or financial
condition. For further information, see “Regulation of First Home”
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2010.
On August
17, 2009, the Company and the Savings Bank each entered into a Stipulation and
Consent to the Issuance of Order to
Cease and
Desist from the OTS.
Under the
terms of the OTS orders, the Bank and the Company, without the prior written
approval of the OTS, may not:
·
|
Increase
assets during any quarter;
|
·
|
Pay
dividends;
|
·
|
Increase
brokered deposits;
|
·
|
Repurchase
shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock;
and
|
·
|
Issue
any debt securities or incur any debt (other than that incurred in the
normal course of business).
|
Other
material provisions of the order require the Savings Bank and the Company
to:
9
·
|
develop
a business plan for enhancing, measuring and maintaining profitability,
increasing earnings, improving liquidity, maintaining capital levels,
acceptable to the OTS;
|
·
|
ensure
the Savings Bank’s compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations and
agency guidelines, including the terms of the
order;
|
·
|
not
appoint any new director or senior executive officer or change the
responsibilities of any current senior executive officers without
notifying the OTS;
|
·
|
not
enter into, renew, extend or revise any compensation or benefit agreements
for directors or senior executive
officers;
|
·
|
not
make any indemnification, severance or golden parachute
payments;
|
·
|
enhance
its asset classification policy;
|
·
|
provide
progress reports to the OTS regarding certain classified
assets;
|
·
|
submit
a comprehensive plan for reducing classified
assets;
|
·
|
develop
a plan to reduce its concentration in certain loans contained in the loan
portfolio and that addresses the assessment, monitoring and control of the
risks associated with the commercial real estate
portfolio;
|
·
|
not
enter into any arrangement or contract with a third party service provider
that is significant to the overall operation or financial condition of the
Savings Bank, or that is outside the normal course of business;
and
|
·
|
prepare
and submit progress reports to the OTS. The OTS orders will remain in
effect until modified or terminated by the
OTS.
|
All
customer deposits remain insured to the fullest extent permitted by the FDIC
since entering into the order. The Savings Bank has continued to serve its
customers in all areas including making loans, establishing lines of credit,
accepting deposits and processing banking transactions. Neither the Company nor
the Savings Bank admitted any wrongdoing in entering into the respective
Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Cease and Desist Order. The OTS did
not impose or recommend any monetary penalties.
For
additional information regarding the terms of the orders, please see our Form
8-K that we filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009. Further, we may be subject to
more severe future regulatory enforcement actions, including but not limited to
civil money penalties, if we do not comply with the terms of the
order.
Review
of Loan Portfolio
Since
November 2008, in light of a continually worsening economy and the departure of
several loan officers, the Savings Bank has conducted ongoing, in depth reviews
and analyses of the loans in its portfolio, primarily focusing on its commercial
real estate, multi-family, development and commercial business loans. During the
year ended June 30, 2009, based primarily on this ongoing loan review, and in
light of the economic conditions, the Savings Bank recorded a provision for loan
losses of $5.3 million for the year. During the year ended June 30, 2010, an
additional provision for loan losses totaling $852,000 was recorded by the
Company.
Beginning
with the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company has engaged the services
of a consultant with an extensive background in commercial real estate,
multi-family, development and commercial business lending. The purpose of hiring
the consultant was to assist the Company and the Savings Bank in meeting
reporting deadlines established in the Orders and, to validate the methodology
used internally to review, evaluate and analyze loans. This consultant performed
an extensive review of the Company’s credits of $250,000 or larger during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 and performed follow up reviews during the
quarters ended December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.
10
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
At its
December 19, 2008 meeting, the Board of Directors, following extensive
discussions over several months, determined that it was in the best interest of
both the Savings Bank and the Company to cash out the bank owned life insurance
(“BOLI”) owned by the Savings Bank. This decision resulted in an additional tax
provision of $562,000. However, the benefits from the transaction in the form of
additional liquidity provided by the proceeds, the elimination of a non-cash
flowing asset and a reduction in the Company’s exposure to the increased risk
that has been a significant factor in the marketplace over the last several
months, more than offset the cost. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had received
the cash proceeds from two of the three insurance companies that had issued
policies under the BOLI plan. The remaining BOLI funds were received during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Operating
Strategy
The
primary goals of management, during fiscal 2010 and for the immediate future,
have been to improve profitability, reduce and manage risk and take whatever
steps necessary to satisfy the terms and conditions of the Cease and Desist
orders under which both the Company and the Savings Bank are currently
conducting business, with the stated purpose of having those orders
lifted. Operating results depend primarily on net interest income,
which is the difference between the income earned on interest-earning assets,
consisting of loans and securities, and the cost of interest-bearing
liabilities, consisting of deposits and borrowings. Net income is
also affected by, among other things, provisions for loan losses and operating
expenses. Operating results are also significantly affected by
general economic and competitive conditions, primarily changes in market
interest rates, governmental legislation and policies concerning monetary and
fiscal affairs and housing, as well as, by other financial institutions and the
actions of the regulatory authorities. Management’s strategy is to
strengthen First Home’s presence in its primary market area.
Management
has implemented various general strategies with the intent of improving
profitability while maintaining, and as necessary, improving safety and
soundness. Primary among those strategies are, to the extent that
market conditions allow, increasing the volume of originated one-to-four family
loans, actively seeking high quality commercial real estate loans, continuing
improvement in, and maintaining, asset quality, and managing interest-rate
risk. Historically, First Home has been primarily an originator of
adjustable rate loans. However, the Savings Bank, on a limited basis, continues
to originate fixed-rate, single-family mortgages for sale into the secondary
market.
Lending. Historically,
First Home predominantly originated one-to-four family residential
loans. One-to-four family residential loans were 46% of the mortgage
loans originated, or 36% of total loan originations, during fiscal year 2010,
compared with 80% of the mortgage loans originated, or 76% of total loan
originations, during fiscal 2009. At June 30, 2010, residential
mortgage loans as a percent of the Savings Bank’s total gross loan portfolio
were approximately 54% compared to approximately 52% at June 30,
2009. Commercial real estate and land loan originations were
approximately 20% of mortgage loan originations in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2010,
the total amount of commercial real estate and land loans originated decreased
to $5.1 million from $7.6 million in fiscal 2009. However, the ratio of
originations of such loans to total mortgage loan originations increased to
approximately 54%. The increase in this number was due primarily to the decrease
in one-to-four family mortgage loan originations, which was the result of the
closing of the loan production office in June 2009, and the general lack of
demand for such loans in the existing economic
environment. Commercial real estate and land loans will continue to
be a part of the real estate loans originated by the Savings Bank, but it is not
anticipated they will exceed 25% of total originations.
Asset Quality. Asset quality
remains a significant concern of the Company’s management and Board of
Directors. The Savings Bank’s asset quality is monitored and measured
using various bench-marks. The two key items are non-performing loans
and classified loans. Non-performing loans consist of non-
11
accrual
loans, loans past due over 90 days and impaired loans not past due or past due
less than 60 days. Classified loans are loans internally identified
as having greater credit risk and requiring additional monitoring. Past due and
non-accrual loans, including loans 30-89 days delinquent, at June 30, 2010
were $4.8 million, or 4.32% of the total loan portfolio, and included
$312,000, or 0.52% of total residential loans, $31,000, or 0.70% of total second
mortgage loans, $4.3 million, or 12.48% of total commercial real estate loans,
$40,000, or 0.92%, of total land loans, $83,000, or 1.85%, of total commercial
business loans, and $46,000; or 1.59% of total consumer loans.
The table
below shows the risk classification of the Savings Bank’s loan portfolio at the
dates indicated. Non-performing loans increased by $615,000, or
18.6%, to $3.9 million at June 30, 2010 from $3.3 million at June 30,
2009. During fiscal 2010, real estate owned and repossessed assets
increased by $2.2 million from $1.7 million to $3.9 million. Net charge-offs for
fiscal 2010 decreased by $1.2 million from net charge-offs for fiscal 2009, to
$2.7 million from $3.9 million. Classified loans decreased by $2.6 million, or
25.2%, to $7.7 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $10.3 million at June 30,
2009. Stricter internal policies relating to the identification and
monitoring of loans resulted in a significant increase in classified loans by
June 30, 2009. Many of the loans identified as problems in fiscal
2009 were resolved through foreclosures, repossessions and refinancing by other
lenders. In addition to the classified loans, the Savings Bank has identified an
additional $1.6 million of credits at June 30, 2010 as ”special mention” on its
internal watch list including $623,000, $70,000, and $909,000 of commercial real
estate, land, and commercial business, respectively. Management has identified
these loans as high risk credits and any deterioration in their financial
condition could increase the classified loan totals.
Of the
$7.7 million in classified loans as of June 30, 2010, three loans with
outstanding balances totaling $520,000 were outside the Savings Bank’s market
area. The allowance for loan losses related to these three loans totaled
$302,000 as of June 30, 2010. One of these loans totaling $288,000, with related
allowances for loan losses of $48,000, was located in another area of the state
of Missouri the other two loans were located in Tennessee and
Arkansas.
Asset
quality: (in thousands)
At
or for the
Year
Ended June 30,
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||
Non-performing assets:
|
|||||
Past
due over 90 days
|
$
-
|
$ 288
|
|||
Non-accrual
loans
|
3,927
|
3,024
|
|||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Total
non-performing loans
|
3,927
|
3,312
|
|||
Real
estate owned
|
3,885
|
1,549
|
|||
Repossessed
assets
|
61
|
158
|
|||
Impaired
loans not past due
|
5,228
|
7,013
|
|||
Total
non-performing assets
|
$ 13,101
|
$
12,032
|
|||
Classified loans:
|
|||||
Loss
|
$
-
|
$ -
|
|||
Doubtful
|
-
|
4,189
|
|||
Substandard
|
7,678
|
6,137
|
|||
Total
classified loans
|
7,678
|
10,326
|
|||
Special
Mention loans
|
1,477
|
-
|
|||
Total
loans of concern
|
$ 9,155
|
$ 10,326
|
|||
Net
charge-offs
|
$ 2,661
|
$ 3,925
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses
|
$
852
|
$ 5,314
|
12
The
Savings Bank’s provision for loan losses for the year ended June 30, 2010
decreased $4.4 million to $852,000 from $5.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2009. The large provision for loan losses during fiscal 2009 was primarily the
result of management’s efforts to identify problem loans and provide the
necessary level of loan loss reserves. Customer cash flows are strained and loan
evaluations reflect an increased awareness of the potential for problems in the
loan portfolio. While the Savings Bank has addressed loan quality issues over
the past couple of years, it became clear that the magnitude of problem loans,
both in terms of their number and the total dollars, was significantly greater
than initially realized when the in-depth loan review process began in November
2008. Steps were taken on each loan, as appropriate for the type of credit, to
determine the current status, the magnitude of the problem, current net value,
updated cash flows, proper classification, accrual status and necessary
reserves. This process resulted in significant increases in classified assets,
watch list credits, the provision for loan losses and net charge offs during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and, with the exception of the provision for
loan losses, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
Managing Interest-Rate
Risk. First Home has relied primarily on adjustable interest
rate loans and short-term fixed-rate loans to manage the inherent risks of
interest rate changes. During fiscal 2006, in order to compete in the
current interest rate environment, First Home began offering long-term fixed
rate mortgages to borrowers with good credit quality. With the goal
of mitigating risk on these long-term fixed rate products, management monitors
the number, outstanding balance and other amounts related to these loans to
determine when changes should be made to the terms of the loans
offered. While a small number of fixed-rate loans are retained in
portfolio, most fixed rate loans originated during the fiscal years ended June
30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were originated for sale in the secondary
market.
Critical Accounting
Policies. The Company uses estimates and assumptions in its
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Material or critical estimates that are susceptible to
significant change include the determination of the allowance for loan losses
and the associated provision for loan losses, the estimation of fair value for a
number of the Company’s assets, and valuing deferred tax assets.
Allowance for
Loan Losses. Management
recognizes that loan losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the
allowance for loan losses must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb
specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. Management of the Savings Bank assesses the allowance for loan losses
on a monthly basis, through the analysis of several different factors including
delinquency, charge-off rates and the changing risk profile of the Company’s
loan portfolio, as well as local economic conditions such as unemployment rates,
bankruptcies and vacancy rates of business and residential
properties.
Management
believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses
is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to change
from period to period. This may require management to make
assumptions about losses on loans; and the impact of a sudden large loss could
require increased provisions, which would negatively affect
earnings.
The
allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is
based on management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in
light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio,
adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the
estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic
conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information
becomes available.
As
mentioned above, one of the factors taken into consideration in the analysis is
charge-off rates which are calculated by loan type. Early in fiscal 2010, the
Savings Bank shortened the historical time period (“look-back period”) reviewed
to calculate these rates from five years to three years. During the Savings
13
Bank’s
most recent examination, the OTS requested that the “look-back period” be
shortened to one year. As a result of the recent charge-off history, this change
resulted in the recording of an additional $359,000 in provision for loan losses
during fiscal 2010. This amount represents approximately 42% of the
provision for fiscal 2010. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, information regarding
one of the Savings Bank’s commercial real estate loans became known which led to
a further evaluation of the Savings Bank’s collateral position on the loan. As a
result of the evaluation, it was determined that a loan loss provision of
$300,000 was needed. These additional provisions for loan losses were
required by applicable standards to be included in the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2010, and resulted in a net loss for the period.
Net
losses in three of the past five fiscal years, and a significant cumulative loss
over that period, required the Company to provide a reserve against its net
deferred tax asset. Please see the discussion below regarding deferred tax
assets.
The
allowance for loan losses includes allowance allocations calculated in
accordance with ASC Topic 310, Receivables and allowance allocations calculated
in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Accounting for
Contingencies. The level of the allowance reflects
management’s continuing evaluations of delinquencies, charge-offs and
recoveries, loan volumes and terms, changes in underwriting procedures, depth of
the Company’s lending management, national and local economy, industry
conditions, credit concentrations, and other external factors, including
competition and legal and regulatory requirements, as well as trends in the
foregoing.
The
allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged
against current period operating results and decreased by the amount of actual
loan charge-offs, net of recoveries.
Estimation of
Fair Value. The estimation of
fair value is significant to a number of the Company’s assets, including
securities and real estate owned. These assets are all recorded at
either fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value.
Declines
in the fair value of equity securities below their amortized cost basis that are
deemed to be other-than-temporary impairment losses are reflected as realized
losses. To determine if an other-than-temporary impairment exists on
an equity security, the Company considers (a) the length of time and the extent
to which the fair value has been less than cost, (b) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer and (c) the intent and ability of the Company
to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow
for an anticipated recovery in fair value. To determine if an
other-than-temporary-impairment exists on a debt security, the Company first
determines if (a) it intends to sell the security or (b) it is more likely than
not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated
recovery. If either of the conditions is met, the Company will
recognize a other-than-temporary-impairment in earnings equal to the difference
between the fair value of the security and its adjusted cost
basis. If neither of the conditions is met, the Company determines
(a) the amount of the impairment related to credit loss and (b) the amount of
the impairment due to all other factors. The difference between the
present values of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost
basis is the credit loss. The amount of the credit loss is included
in the consolidated statements of income as a other-than-temporary-impairment on
securities and is an adjustment to the cost basis of the
security. The portion of the total impairment that is related to all
other factors is included in other comprehensive income (loss).
Real
estate owned is recorded at fair value less the estimated costs to sell the
asset. Any write down at the time of foreclosure is charged against
the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, net expenses related to
holding the property and declines in the market value are charged against
income.
Deferred Tax
Assets. The
Company accounts for income taxes according to the asset and liability method.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing
14
assets
and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates applicable to taxable
income for the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s
judgment that realization is more-likely-than-not. An estimate of probable
income tax benefits that will not be realized in future years is required in
determining the necessity for a valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets.
Due to
the cumulative operating losses over the last five years, which resulted in $3.1
million of loss carry-forwards, the Company was required to provide a reserve of
approximately $1.1 million against its net deferred tax assets
Comparison
of Financial Condition at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009
General. The most
significant change in the Company’s financial condition during the year ended
June 30, 2010 was a decrease in net loans receivable of $24.5 million or
18.4%. This decrease in loans provided the funding to increase our
investment in securities by $14.4 million, increase our investment in
certificates of deposit by $1.6 million, reduce our borrowings from the FHLB of
Des Moines by $7.0 million and fund net outflows of $9.1 million and $361,000 in
deposits and retail repurchase agreements, respectively. Additional funding was
provided by cashing in $2.2 million in BOLI.
Total Assets. Total assets
decreased $18.2 million, or 7.9%, to $211.7 million at June 30, 2010 from $229.9
million at June 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to
the $24.5 million decrease in loans receivable, a $6.0 million decrease in cash
and cash equivalents, and a $2.2 million decrease in BOLI which were partially
offset by increases of $1.6 million in certificates of deposit purchases and
$14.4 million in securities. Additionally, deposits decreased by $9.1 million
and borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines decreased by $7.0
million.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were $20.2 million at
June 30, 2010 compared to $26.2 million at June 30, 2009, a decrease of $6.0
million, or 23.0%. While positive cash flows from loan payments and
repayments was more than needed to fund deposit outflows, management purchased
securities in order to maximize the Savings Bank’s return on its liquidity.
These purchases included the use of both positive cash flows and existing cash
and cash equivalents.
Certificates of Deposit
Purchased. Certificates of deposit purchased as investments
increased $1.6 million to $7.2 million at June 30, 2010 from $5.6 million at
June 30, 2009. The decision to invest in certificates of deposit was
based on a comparison of market interest rates and attendant risk for various
alternative short-term investments. All certificates of deposit are covered by
deposit insurance and had terms of 16 months or less.
Securities. Securities
increased $14.4 million to $62.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $47.9 million at
June 30, 2009. Proceeds from the sales, maturities, calls and
prepayments on securities and payments on loans were reinvested, along with
other excess funds, primarily in United States agency securities and some
mortgage-backed securities issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The
available-for-sale portfolio increased by $15.0 million, or 33.1%, to $60.3
million at June 30, 2010 from $45.3 million at June 30, 2009. The held to
maturity portfolio decreased by $579,000, or 22.3%, to $2.0 million at June 30,
2010 from $2.6 million at June 30, 2009. This change was the result of a
decision, made in fiscal 2007, to allow the held to maturity portfolio to run
off through maturities while new purchases were categorized as
available-for-sale, providing the greatest level of flexibility in the
investment portfolio. There were no sales of securities during fiscal
2010.
Loans
Receivable. Net loans receivable decreased from $133.2 million
at June 30, 2009 to $108.7 million at June 30, 2010. The $24.5 million, or
18.4%, decrease was the result of several factors. The origination of new loans
during fiscal 2010 remained at the low levels experienced during fiscal 2009.
15
The
decline also was the result of the ongoing economic downturn, which both
decreased demand and resulted in a tightening of the Savings Bank’s underwriting
standards. Subsequent to the November 2008 management changes, the Savings Bank
made a concerted effort to remove certain credits from the Savings Bank’s loan
portfolio. There was an increase in foreclosures and repossessions, and a high
level of net charge-offs for the second consecutive fiscal year.
Commercial
real estate loans decreased by $5.2 million, or 13.2%, to $34.6 million at June
30, 2010 from $39.8 million at June 30, 2009. Land loans decreased by $3.0
million, or 41.1%, to $4.4 million at June 30, 2010 from $7.4 million at June
30, 2009. Commercial business loans decreased by $5.3 million, or 54.3%, to $4.5
million at June 30, 2010 from $9.8 million at June 30, 2009. Consumer loans,
including personal and automobile loans, overdrafts, loans on deposit accounts
and second mortgages, decreased by $1.6 million, or 17.7%, to $7.3 million at
June 30, 2010 from $8.9 million at June 30, 2009. One-to-four family loans
decreased by $10.9 million, or 15.4%, to $60.2 million at June 30, 2010 from
$71.1 million at June 30, 2009.
The
origination of loans for portfolio decreased by $8.1 million, or 41.1%, to $11.6
million in fiscal 2010 from $19.7 million in fiscal 2009. Real estate loan
originations, including loans originated for sale, decreased by $29.3 million,
or 75.4%, to $9.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010 compared to $38.9
million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Commercial real estate, multi-family
and land loan originations decreased by $2.4 million, while one-to-four family
loan originations decreased by $26.9 million. Consumer loan originations
decreased by $134,000 to $1.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2010 from $1.6
million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Commercial business loan originations
decreased by $1.0 million to $1.3 million in fiscal 2010, as compared to
originations of $2.3 million in fiscal 2009. The primary reason for the
reduction in loan volume was the nationwide deteriorating economic climate that
prevailed during most of fiscal 2008, all of fiscal 2009 and through the end of
fiscal 2010. In addition, the Savings Bank began to tighten its underwriting
standards in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. This process continued
throughout fiscal 2009 and 2010. While the Savings Bank’s local market areas
have not been impacted to the same degree as other areas of the country, the
slowdown in business activity, the decline in real estate values and the
increased level of unemployment have been readily apparent in the increase in
delinquencies, non-performing assets, classified assets, foreclosures and
repossessions.
Non-accrual Loans. Non-accrual
loans increased from $3.0 million at June 30, 2009 to $3.9 million at June 30,
2010. The $904,000 increase in non-accrual loans was due to an increase of $3.3
million in non-accrual commercial real estate loans. This increase was partially
offset by decreases of $335,000 in non-accrual residential mortgages, $1.5
million in non-accrual land loans and $635,000 in non-accrual commercial
business loans
Non-performing Assets. Non-performing assets
decreased $300,000, from $13.4 million at June 30, 2009 to $13.1 million at June
30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, the ratio of non-performing assets to
total assets was 6.19% compared to 5.23% at June 30, 2009. The Savings Bank’s
non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans and past due loans over 90
days. Non-performing assets also include real estate owned and other repossessed
assets.
The
Savings Bank has identified an additional $1.6 million of credits at June 30,
2010 as “special mention”, including $623,000, $70,000 and $909,000 of
commercial real estate, land and commercial business loans, respectively.
Management has identified these loans as high risk credits and any deterioration
in their financial condition could increase the classified loan totals.
Deposits. Deposits decreased
$9.1 million, or 4.8%, to $180.1 million at June 30, 2010 from $189.2 million at
June 30, 2009. The decrease in deposit balances during fiscal 2010
included decreases of $9.0 million in certificates of deposit, $3.0 million in
non-interest-bearing checking account balances and $628,000 in savings accounts.
These decreases were partially offset by increases of $1.3 million in money
market savings accounts and $2.1 million in NOW account balances. The money
market savings account
16
had $36.0
million in balances at June 30, 2010. Generally, the rates paid by the Savings
Bank on deposits, with the exception of special offerings and specifically
designed accounts, usually fall in the lower half of the range of rates offered
by the Savings Bank’s competitors. However, during fiscal 2010, the Savings Bank
structured its offering rates on certificates of deposit to make longer term
certificates more attractive with limited success.
Retail Repurchase
Agreements. The Savings Bank began to offer retail repurchase
agreements in December 2006. This was done to provide an additional product for
our existing customer base and to attract new customers who would find the
product beneficial. Customers with large balances in checking accounts benefit
by having those balances which exceed a predetermined level “swept” out of the
checking account and into a repurchase account. The repurchase account earns
interest at a floating market rate and is uninsured. However, the balance is
collateralized by designated investment securities of the Savings Bank. At June
30, 2010, the balances of retail repurchase agreements totaled $5.4 million,
representing a decrease of $361,000, or 6.3%, from $5.7 million at June 30,
2009. During most of fiscal 2010, the balances of the retail
repurchase agreements remained relatively stable because there was very little
change in the balances maintained by the largest user of the
program.
Borrowings. Advances
from the FHLB of Des Moines decreased by $7.0 million from $10.0 million at June
30, 2009 to $3.0 million at June 30, 2010. During the year ended June 30, 2010,
the Savings Bank did not borrow any funds from the FHLB of Des
Moines. A $7.0 million short-term advance taken down in fiscal 2009,
came due in November 2009, and was repaid. There were no other borrowed funds
during the year ended June 30, 2010.
Stockholders’
Equity. Stockholders’ equity was $22.6 million at June 30,
2010 compared to $23.8 million at June 30, 2009. The $1.2 million decrease was
the result of the net loss of $1.5 million, which was partially offset by an
increase in paid-in-capital of $9,000, which resulted from stock based
compensation, and an improvement of $322,000 in other comprehensive income,
related to net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities. At June 30, 2010, there were 1,550,815 shares of stock
outstanding, or the same number of shares that were shares outstanding at June
30, 2009. The book value per share decreased to $14.58 at June 30,
2010 from $15.32 at June 30, 2009.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30,
2009
Net Income. The
Company recorded a net loss of $1.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2010, as compared to a net loss of $4.0 million for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009. The primary reason for the $2.5 million reduction in the
net loss was a decrease of $4.4 million in the provision for loan losses in
fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. In addition, non-interest expense decreased
by $2.2 million in fiscal 2010 to $7.6 million from $9.8 million in fiscal 2009,
These positive changes were partially offset by a decrease in net interest
income of $412,000 to $6.5 million in fiscal 2010 from $6.9 million in fiscal
2009, and a decrease in non-interest income of $1.1 million to $1.5 million
during fiscal 2010 from $2.6 million during fiscal 2009. Additionally, the
Company recorded a tax provision of $1.0 million during fiscal 2010 compared to
recording a benefit of $1.5 million during fiscal 2009.
Net Interest
Income. Net interest income decreased $412,000, or 6.0%, to
$6.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $6.9 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Total interest income decreased $2.6
million, while total interest expense decreased by $2.2 million.
Interest
Income. Interest income decreased $2.8 million, or 20.9%, to
$9.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $12.4 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Interest income on loans receivable
decreased by $2.3 million, or 23.0%, to $7.5 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010 from $9.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the average balance of net
loans outstanding decreased $28.8 million, or 19.3%, to $120.5 million from
$149.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. In addition, the yield
on net loans outstanding
17
decreased
to 6.24% in fiscal 2010 from 6.54% in fiscal 2009 due to the continuing reduced
level of market interest rates that took place in fiscal 2009, and to
substantial decreases in the outstanding balances of commercial real estate and
commercial business loans during 2010. These types of loans generally have
higher rates. Total loan originations were $12.3 million during the year ended
June 30, 2010, while sales of loans totaled $1.4 million and repayments on loans
were $31.7 million.
Interest
income from securities decreased $407,000, or 16.6% to $2.0 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 from $2.5 million for the year ended June 30,
2009. The decrease was the result of a decrease in the yield on
securities to 3.88% for fiscal 2010 from 4.97% for fiscal 2009, which was
partially offset by an increase of $2.7 million, or 5.4%, in the average balance
of securities to $52.0 million in fiscal 2010 from $49.3 million in fiscal
2009.
Interest
income from other interest-earning assets (primarily overnight funds) increased
$71,000, or 49.5%, to $214,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from
$143,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase is
attributable to an increase in the yield on other interest-earning assets from
0.69% for the year ended June 30, 2009 to 0.91% for the year ended June 30,
2010, and to an increase in the average balance of other interest-earning assets
from $20.7 million in fiscal 2009 to $26.3 million during fiscal
2010.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2010 decreased $2.2 million, or 40.0%, to $3.2 million from $5.4 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Expense on interest-bearing customer
deposits decreased by $1.2 million, or 27.9%, to $3.0 million for fiscal 2010
from $4.2 million for fiscal 2009. This decrease was the result of a decrease of
$3.1 million, or 1.8%, in the average balance of deposits to $170.5 million for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $173.6 million for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2009, and by a decrease in the average cost of deposits to 1.77%
for fiscal 2010 from 2.41% for fiscal 2009. The decrease in the
average cost of deposits was the result of low short-term interest rates during
fiscal 2010 and maturities of higher costing time deposits.
Interest
expense on retail repurchase agreements decreased by $16,000 to $70,000 during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $86,000 for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009. The decrease was the result of a decrease in the average balance of
retail repurchase agreements of $192,000 to $4.8 million for fiscal 2010 from
$5.0 million for fiscal 2009, and by a decrease in the average cost on retail
repurchase agreements to 1.45% for fiscal 2010 from 1.71% for fiscal 2009.
Interest expense on other interest-bearing liabilities decreased $994,000, or
84.6%, to $181,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $1.2 million for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was the result of a decrease
in the average cost of these liabilities to 3.18% in fiscal 2010 from 5.14% in
fiscal 2009, and by a decrease in the average balance of these liabilities of
$17.2 million to $5.7 million for fiscal 2010 from $22.8 million for fiscal
2009.
Provision for Loan
Losses. The provision for loan losses decreased $4.4 million,
or 84.0%, to $852,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $5.3 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The allowance for loan
losses was $4.2 million, or 3.05%, of gross loans at June 30, 2009 compared to
$2.5 million, or 2.28%, of gross loans at June 30, 2010. Loan
charge-offs, net of recoveries was $2.7 million for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2010 compared to $3.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. While net loan charge-offs decreased in fiscal 2010 compared to
fiscal 2009, the amount for both years was significantly greater than the charge
offs in recent previous years. This was the result of an extensive loan review
which began in November 2008 which identified a significant number of problem
loans, both in terms of numbers of loans and total dollars Many
of the loans identified as problems during the twenty month period ended June
30, 2010 were or became delinquent, migrated to classified assets, became
subject to specific impairment analysis and were written down, or taken into
real estate owned or repossessed collateral at some amount less than the loan
balances.
18
Non-interest
Income. Non-interest income decreased $1.1 million, or 42.2%,
to $1.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 compared to $2.6 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. During fiscal 2010, there
were decreases of $397,000, or 20.8%, in service charges and other fee income,
$136,000 in income from BOLI, $487,000, or 91.6%, in gain on the sale of loans,
$55,000, or 33.0%, in other operating income. In addition, during fiscal 2009,
there was a profit on the sale of securities available-for-sale of $143,000
which did not repeat in fiscal 2010. These decreases were slightly offset by a
decrease of $85,000, or 31.8%, in the provision for losses on real estate owned.
The decrease in service charges and other fee income seems to reflect a higher
level of caution on the part of checking customers in a difficult economic
period. The decrease in income on BOLI is the result of the liquidation during
calendar 2009, of the Savings Bank’s BOLI policies with approximately two thirds
of the proceeds received in fiscal 2009 and the balance in fiscal 2010. The
write downs on real estate owned are the result of decreases in real estate
values during the ongoing economic downturn, and a decrease in the number of
active buyers for such properties. The decrease in gain on the sale of loans was
the result of closing the loan production office in June
2009.
Non-interest
Expense. Non-interest expense decreased $2.2 million, or
22.4%, to $7.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 from $9.8 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. There were decreases of $796,000,
$252,000 and $1.6 million in compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment
and other expenses, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by
increases of $85,000 and $347,000 in professional fees and deposit insurance
premiums, respectively.
Compensation
and employee benefits decreased $796,000, or 18.0%, to $3.6 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in compensation and benefits
included a decrease of $696,000, or 20.2%, in compensation and a decrease of
$67,000, or 17.7%, in related payroll taxes. The decrease in compensation and
payroll taxes was due primarily to staff reductions during the year. At the
beginning of fiscal 2010, the Company had 102 full-time equivalent employees,
and at the end of the year the Company had 90 full-time equivalent employees, a
reduction 11.8%. In addition, the cost of group health insurance decreased by
$48,000, or 9.5%. These decreases were partially offset by a decrease of
$35,000, or 28.7%, in the amount of compensation costs deferred on loan
originations under ASC 310-02 and an increase of $24,000, or 24.4%, in costs
related to retirement plans.
Occupancy
and equipment expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 decreased
$252,000, or 15.5%, to $1.4 million from $1.6 million for fiscal 2009. The
largest decreases were $78,000 in depreciation on fixed assets, $48,000 in
maintenance expense, $47,000 in rent expense, $27,000 in repairs and $18,000 in
utilities. The decreases in rent and utilities was partially attributable to the
Savings Bank discontinuing its use of the original loan production facility at
the end of calendar 2008, and subleasing the second loan production facility in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease in depreciation expense was due
primarily to furniture, fixtures and equipment that became fully depreciated,
but continues in use. Maintenance and repair expenses were higher than usual in
fiscal 2009 due to a number of items that required attention. The only
significant increase in costs was in computer expense as the Savings Bank
continued to make improvements to its systems.
Professional
fees increased $85,000, or 19.1%, from $446,000 in fiscal 2009 to $531,000 in
fiscal 2010. The increase in professional fees includes increases in
external audit fees, internal audit fees and costs related to compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
Deposit
insurance premiums increased $347,000, or 135.6%, from $256,000 in fiscal 2009
to $603,000 in fiscal 2010, primarily as the result of higher premium
assessments from the FDIC and a special 5 basis point assessment levied by the
FDIC on the June 30, 2009 calculation base. In light of the costs to the
insurance fund of financial institution failures during calendar 2009 and the
first half of calendar 2010, it is possible that additional future special
assessments will be levied.
19
Other
non-interest expense decreased by $1.6 million, or 51.7%, from $3.1 million for
fiscal 2009 to $1.5 million for fiscal 2010. The decrease in this category,
which covers all other operating expense of the Company, was primarily due to a
$1.2 million penalty incurred in fiscal 2009 related to the prepayment of $19.0
million in borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines. This penalty was not incurred
during fiscal 2010.
Income
Taxes. Income tax benefit for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009 totaled $1.5 million which was primarily the result of a pre-tax loss of
$5.6 million in fiscal 2009. The income tax expense of $1.0 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. This was the result of the reversal of
current year and previously recorded net deferred tax benefits. In light of the
cumulative net losses the Company has experienced over the last five fiscal
years, current accounting standards required that the net deferred tax asset be
reserved. Future earnings are expected to enable the Company to recover these
reserved deferred tax assets.
Net Interest
Margin Net interest margin for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2010 was 3.28% compared to 3.16% for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. The increase in the net interest margin was the result of a
decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities that was only partially
offset by a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets. The ratio of
average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
increased from 108.9% during fiscal 2009 to 109.8% during fiscal 2010 and the
interest rate spread between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities increased 17 basis points from 2.94% during fiscal 2009 to 3.11%
during fiscal 2010.
Average
Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Costs
The
earnings of the Savings Bank depend largely on the spread between the yield on
interest-earning assets (primarily loans and securities) and the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities (primarily deposit accounts and FHLB advances), as
well as the relative size of the Savings Bank's interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liability portfolios.
20
Yields
Earned and Rates Paid
The
following table sets forth (on a consolidated basis) for the periods and at the
date indicated, the weighted average yields earned on the Company’s and First
Home's assets, the weighted average interest rates paid on First Home's
liabilities, together with the net yield on interest-earning
assets.
At
June 30,
|
Years
Ended June 30
|
|||||||
2010
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Weighted
average yield
|
||||||||
on
loan portfolio
|
6.16
|
%
|
6.24
|
%
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
|
Weighted
average yield
|
||||||||
on
securities
|
3.83
|
3.88
|
4.97
|
|||||
Weighted
average yield on other
|
||||||||
interest-earning
assets
|
0.71
|
0.91
|
0.69
|
|||||
Weighted
average yield
|
||||||||
on
all interest-earning assets
|
4.76
|
4.92
|
5.64
|
|||||
Weighted
average rate
|
||||||||
paid
on total deposits
|
1.39
|
1.77
|
2.41
|
|||||
Weighted
average rate paid on retail
|
||||||||
repurchase
agreements
|
1.47
|
1.45
|
1.71
|
|||||
Weighted
average rate paid on other
|
||||||||
interest-bearing
liabilities
|
4.94
|
3.18
|
5.14
|
|||||
Weighted
average rate paid on
|
All
interest-bearing liabilities
|
1.45
|
1.80
|
2.70
|
|||||
Interest
rate spread (spread
|
||||||||
between
weighted average
|
||||||||
rate
on all interest-earning assets
|
||||||||
and
all interest-bearing liabilities)
|
3.31
|
3.11
|
2.94
|
|||||
Net
interest margin (net interest
|
||||||||
income
(expense) as a percentage
|
||||||||
of
average interest-earning assets)
|
N/A
|
3.28
|
3.16
|
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding
average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts
of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on
average interest-bearing liabilities, resultant yields, interest rate spread,
net interest margin, and ratio of average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities.
21
Years
Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
|
Interest
|
|||||||||||||
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||
Balance(2)
|
Dividends
|
Cost
|
Balance(2)
|
Dividends
|
Cost
|
|||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||
Loans(1)
|
$ 120,468
|
$ 7,518
|
6.24
|
%
|
$
149,325
|
$ 9,770
|
6.54
|
%
|
||||||
Securities
|
51,995
|
2,020
|
3.88
|
49,320
|
2,452
|
4.97
|
||||||||
Other
|
26,336
|
239
|
0.91
|
20,747
|
144
|
0.69
|
||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
198,799
|
9,777
|
4.92
|
219,392
|
12,366
|
5.64
|
||||||||
Non-interest
earning assets
|
||||||||||||||
Office
properties and equipment, net
|
6,311
|
6,793
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate, net
|
3,016
|
1,651
|
||||||||||||
Other
non-interest earning assets
|
8,766
|
13,757
|
||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ 216,892
|
$ 241,593
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Savings
and Money Market savings accounts
|
$ 46,738
|
631
|
1.35
|
$ 46,210
|
913
|
1.98
|
||||||||
Checking
and Super Saver accounts
|
42,459
|
362
|
0.85
|
41,835
|
407
|
0.97
|
||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
81,319
|
2,022
|
2.49
|
85,598
|
2,862
|
3.34
|
||||||||
Total
deposits
|
170,516
|
3,015
|
1.77
|
173,643
|
4,182
|
2.41
|
||||||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
4,837
|
70
|
1.45
|
5,029
|
86
|
1.71
|
||||||||
Advances from
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,692
|
181
|
3.18
|
22,846
|
1,175
|
5.14
|
||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
181,045
|
3,266
|
1.80
|
201,518
|
5,443
|
2.70
|
||||||||
Non-interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
11,837
|
14,217
|
||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
192,882
|
215,735
|
||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
24,010
|
25,858
|
||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
||||||||||||||
stockholders'
equity
|
$ 216,892
|
$ 241,593
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ 6,511
|
$ 6,923
|
||||||||||||
Interest
rate spread
|
3.11
|
%
|
2.94
|
%
|
||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.28
|
%
|
3.16
|
%
|
||||||||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning
|
||||||||||||||
assets
to average interest-
|
||||||||||||||
bearing
liabilities
|
109.8%
|
108.9%
|
(1)
|
Average
balances include non-accrual loans and loans 90 days or more past due. The
corresponding interest up to the date of non-accrual status has been
included in the "Interest and Dividends"
column.
|
(2)
|
Average
balances for a period have been calculated using the average monthly
balances for the respective
year.
|
22
Rate/Volume
Analysis
The
following table presents certain information regarding changes in interest
income and interest expense of the Company and Savings Bank for the periods
indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to (i)
effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in
volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) effects on interest
income and interest expense attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate
multiplied by prior volume); (iii) the net changes (the sum of the previous
columns). The effects on interest income and interest expense
attributable to changes in both rate and volume are allocated to the change in
volume variance and the change in the rate variance on a pro rated
basis.
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
Due
to
|
Due
to
|
||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
||||||
(In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|||||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
$ (1,820)
|
$ (432)
|
$ (2,252)
|
$ (844)
|
$ (1,306)
|
$ (2,150)
|
|||||
Securities
|
133
|
(565)
|
(432)
|
230
|
(148)
|
82
|
|||||
Other
|
44
|
51
|
95
|
95
|
(489)
|
(394)
|
|||||
Total
net change in income on
|
|||||||||||
interest-earnings
assets
|
(1,643)
|
(946)
|
(2,589)
|
(519)
|
(1,943)
|
(2,462)
|
|||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
(74)
|
(1,093)
|
(1,167)
|
(260)
|
(1,687)
|
(1,947)
|
|||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
(3)
|
(13)
|
(16)
|
77
|
(27)
|
50
|
|||||
Other
interest-bearing liabilities
|
(659)
|
(335)
|
(994)
|
49
|
(160)
|
(111)
|
|||||
Total
net change in expense on
|
|||||||||||
interest-bearing
liabilities
|
(736)
|
(1,441)
|
(2,177)
|
(134)
|
(1,874)
|
(2,008)
|
|||||
Net
change in net interest income
|
$ (907)
|
$ 495
|
$ (412)
|
$ (385)
|
$ (69)
|
$ (454)
|
|||||
(1) Includes
interest on loans 90 days or more past due not on non-accrual
status.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
First
Home’s primary sources of funds are proceeds from principal and interest
payments on loans and securities, customer deposits, customer retail repurchase
agreements and FHLB advances. While maturities and scheduled
amortization of loans and securities are a relatively predictable source of
funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general
interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The
primary investing activity of First Home is the origination of mortgage loans.
Mortgage loans originated by First Home decreased by $29.3 million to $9.6
million for the year ended June 30, 2010 from $38.9 million for the year ended
June 30, 2009. Other investing activities include the purchase of
securities and certificates of deposit, which totaled $45.4 million and $30.0
million for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the
origination of non-mortgage loans, which totaled $2.7 million and $3.9 million
for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These
activities were funded primarily by principal repayments and prepayments on
loans and maturities and calls on securities.
23
During
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s cash and securities increased
by $10.0 million to over $89.7 million from $79.8 million at June 30, 2009. This
resulted primarily from the decrease in the loan portfolio, partially offset by
a moderate decrease in the deposit base. Management believed that an increase in
liquid assets would serve the Company well in the current economic
climate.
OTS
regulations require First Home to maintain an adequate level of liquidity to
ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit
withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of
investment opportunities. First Home’s sources of funds include
customer deposits, retail repurchase agreements, principal and interest payments
from loans and securities, FHLB advances and other credit lines. During both
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, First Home used its sources of funds primarily to
purchase securities and domestic certificates of deposit, repay advances from
the FHLB of Des Moines, fund loan commitments and to pay maturing savings
certificates and deposit withdrawals. At June 30, 2010, First Home had approved
customer loan commitments totaling $594,000 and unused lines of credit totaling
$3.7 million.
Liquid
funds necessary for the normal daily operations of First Home are maintained in
checking accounts, a daily time account with the FHLB of Des Moines and a
repurchase agreement account at a regional bank. It is the Savings
Bank’s current policy to maintain adequate collected balances in checking
accounts to meet daily operating expenses, customer withdrawals, and fund loan
demand. Funds received from daily operating activities are deposited,
on a daily basis, in one of the checking accounts and transferred, when
appropriate, to the daily time account, used to purchase investments or reduce
FHLB advances to enhance net interest income.
At June
30, 2010, certificates of deposit of customers amounted to $77.2 million, or
42.9%, of First Home’s total deposits, including $55.9 million which are
scheduled to mature by June 30, 2011. Historically, First Home has
been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they
mature. Management of First Home believes it has adequate resources
to fund all loan commitments with savings deposits and FHLB advances and that it
can adjust the offering rates of savings certificates to retain deposits in
changing interest rate environments.
Capital
OTS
regulations require First Home to maintain specific amounts of
capital. As of June 30, 2010, First Home was in compliance with all
current regulatory capital requirements with tangible, core and risk-based
capital ratios of 9.7%, 9.7% and 20.0%, respectively. These ratios
exceed the 1.5%, 4.0% and 8.0% tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios
required by OTS regulations. In addition, the OTS amended its capital
regulations that require savings institutions to maintain specified amounts of
regulatory capital based on the estimated effects of changes in market rates and
that could further increase the amount of regulatory capital required to be
maintained by the Savings Bank.
Consistent
with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we
actively seek to maintain a "well capitalized" institution in accordance with
regulatory standards. Total equity capital was $22.8 million at June
30, 2010, or 10.75%, of total assets on that date. As of June 30, 2010, we
exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. Our regulatory capital
ratios at June 30, 2010 were as follows: Tier 1 (core) capital 9.65%; Tier 1
risk-based capital 18.81%; and total risk-based capital 19.99%. The
regulatory capital requirements to be considered well capitalized are 5%, 6% and
10%, respectively.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the
normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of our
customers. These financial instruments generally include commitments
to originate mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, and involve to varying
24
degrees,
elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the balance sheet. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss in
the event of nonperformance by the borrower is represented by the contractual
amount of those instruments. Since some commitments may expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company uses the same credit
policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments. Collateral is not required to support
commitments.
Undisbursed
balances of loans closed include funds not disbursed but committed for
construction projects. Unused lines of credit include funds not
disbursed but committed to, on home equity, commercial and consumer lines of
credit.
Commercial
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee
the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are
primarily used to support public and private borrowing
arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit
is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. Collateral held varies as specified above and is required
in instances where we deem it necessary.
The
following is a summary of commitments and contingent liabilities with
off-balance sheet risks as of June 30, 2010:
Commitments:
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
||
Fixed
rate loans
|
$ 232
|
|
Adjustable
rate loans
|
362
|
|
Undisbursed
balance of loans closed
|
912
|
|
Unused
lines of credit
|
3,659
|
|
Commercial
standby letters of credit
|
132
|
|
Total
|
$ 5,297
|
|
Accounting
Policies
Various
elements of the Company’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently
subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective
assessments. In particular, management has identified several
accounting policies that, as a result of the judgments, estimates and
assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of the
financial statements of the Company. These policies relate to the
methodology for the determination of the provision and allowance for loan
losses, the valuation of real estate held for sale and the allowance for
deferred income taxes. These policies and the judgments, estimates
and assumptions are described in greater detail in this Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section and in the
section entitled “New accounting standards” contained in Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes that the
judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial
statements are appropriate based on the factual circumstances at the
time. However, because of the sensitivity of the financial statements
to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and
assumptions could result in material differences in the results of operations or
financial condition.
Effect
of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial data presented herein
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, which require the measurement of financial
position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without
25
considering
the changes in relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation. The primary impact of inflation on operations of First
Home is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most
industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates
generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s
performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do
not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices
of goods and services. During the current interest rate environment,
management believes that the liquidity and the maturity structure of First
Home’s assets and liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable
profitability.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity of Net
Portfolio Value. The following table sets forth the change in
the Savings Bank’s net portfolio value at June 30, 2010, based on (OTS) models.
Net portfolio value is the present value of expected cash flows from assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The calculation is intended to
illustrate the change in net portfolio value that will occur upon an immediate
and permanent change in interest rates at the various levels of change
indicated. There is no effect given to any steps that management might take to
counter the effect of that interest rate movement.
Net
Portfolio as % of
|
||||||||||||
Net
Portfolio Value
|
Portfolio
Value of Assets
|
|||||||||||
Basis
Point ("bp")
|
Dollar
|
Dollar
|
Percent
|
Net
Portfolio
|
||||||||
Change
in Rates
|
Amount
|
Change(1)
|
Change
|
Value
Ratio(2)
|
Change(3)
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
300
|
bp
|
$
31,041
|
$
1,473
|
5
|
%
|
14.15
|
%
|
70
|
bp
|
|||
200
|
30,949
|
1,381
|
5
|
14.07
|
62
|
|||||||
100
|
30,558
|
990
|
3
|
13.88
|
43
|
|||||||
50
|
29,862
|
294
|
1
|
13.58
|
13
|
|||||||
-
|
39,568
|
-
|
-
|
13.45
|
-
|
|||||||
(50)
|
28,727
|
(841)
|
(3)
|
13.10
|
(35)
|
|||||||
(100)
|
28,068
|
(1,500)
|
(5)
|
12.83
|
(62)
|
(1)
|
Represents
the increase (decrease) of the estimated net portfolio value at the
indicated change in interest rates compared to the net portfolio value
assuming no change in interest
rates.
|
(2)
|
Calculated
as the estimated net portfolio value divided by the portfolio value of
total assets.
|
(3)
|
Calculated
as the increase (decrease) of the net portfolio value ratio assuming the
indicated change in interest rates over the estimated net portfolio value
ratio assuming no change in interest
rates.
|
The above
table illustrates, for example, that at June 30, 2010 an instantaneous 200 basis
point increase in market interest rates would increase the Savings Bank’s net
portfolio value by approximately $1.4 million, or approximately 5%, and an
instantaneous 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would decrease
the Savings Bank’s net portfolio value by $1.5 million, or approximately
5%.
26
The
following summarizes key exposure measures for the dates
indicated. They measure the change in net portfolio value ratio for a
200 basis point increase and for a 100 basis point decrease in interest
rates.
June
30,
|
March
31,
|
June
30,
|
||||
2010
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||
Pre-shock
net portfolio
|
||||||
Value
ratio
|
13.45%
|
16.73%
|
15.26%
|
|||
Post-shock
net portfolio
|
||||||
Value
ratio (Up 200 bp)
|
14.07%
|
16.70%
|
15.83%
|
|||
Increase
(decrease) in portfolio
|
||||||
Value
ratio (Up 200 bp)
|
62
bp
|
(3)
bp
|
57
bp
|
|||
Post-shock
net portfolio
|
||||||
Value
ratio (Down 100 bp)
|
12.83%
|
16.29%
|
14.61%
|
|||
Increase
(decrease) in portfolio
|
||||||
Value
ratio (Down 100 bp)
|
(62)
bp
|
(44)
bp
|
(65)
bp
|
The
calculated risk exposure measures of the Savings Bank’s interest rate risk at
June 30, 2010 indicate that the “shock” increase in market rates would increase
the net portfolio value while the “shock” decrease in market rates would
decrease the net portfolio value. This is consistent with the exposure measures
calculated at June 30, 2009. There was an improvement of 5 basis points, to 62
basis points, for the up 200 basis point scenario at June 30, 2010 compared to
57 basis points for the same scenario at June 30, 2009. There was an improvement
of three basis points, to a negative 62 basis points, for the down 100 basis
point scenario at June 30, 2010 compared to a negative 65 basis points for the
same scenario at June 30, 2009.
The OTS
uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of thrift
institutions. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan
prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets
under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any
method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the
method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example,
although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or period to
re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest
rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and
liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while
interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market interest
rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage
loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term
basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a
change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early
withdrawals from certificates of deposit could deviate significantly from those
assumed in calculating the table.
27
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
First
Bancshares, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of First
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no
such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of First Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Kansas
City, Missouri
October
13, 2010
28
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|||||||
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | |||||||
June
30, 2010 and 2009
|
|||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 20,182,593 | $ | 26,217,607 | |||
Certificates
of deposit purchased
|
7,221,578 | 5,628,062 | |||||
Securities
available-for-sale
|
60,304,479 | 45,316,804 | |||||
Securities
held to maturity. fair value at:
|
|||||||
June 30, 2010, $2,072,084; June 30, 2009, $2,626,106
|
2,012,940 | 2,591,510 | |||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
434,000 | 1,580,800 | |||||
Loans
receivable, net allowance for loan losses at:
|
|||||||
June 30, 2010, $2,526,862; June 30, 2009, $4,185,326
|
108,683,381 | 133,162,106 | |||||
Loans
held for sale
|
- | 820,270 | |||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
819,752 | 955,037 | |||||
Prepaid
FDIC insurance premiums
|
1,196,465 | 82,548 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
380,487 | 317,205 | |||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
6,051,423 | 6,669,373 | |||||
Real
estate owned and other repossessed assets, net
|
3,945,628 | 1,706,615 | |||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
135,241 | 185,355 | |||||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
- | 1,838,785 | |||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
152,975 | 274,583 | |||||
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
- | 2,154,025 | |||||
Other
assets
|
136,031 | 414,608 | |||||
Total assets
|
$ | 211,656,973 | $ | 229,915,293 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 180,075,425 | $ | 189,217,878 | |||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
5,352,402 | 5,713,382 | |||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
3,000,000 | 10,000,000 | |||||
Accrued
expenses
|
617,915 | 1,220,142 | |||||
Total liabilities
|
189,045,742 | 206,151,402 | |||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|||||||
none issued
|
- | - | |||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 8,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|||||||
issued 2,895,036 in 2010 and in 2009, outstanding
|
|||||||
1,550,815 in 2010 and in 2009
|
28,950 | 28,950 | |||||
Paid-in
capital
|
18,056,714 | 18,047,257 | |||||
Retained
earnings – substantially restricted
|
22,538,555 | 24,022,637 | |||||
Treasury
stock, at cost - 1,344,221 shares in 2010 and in 2009
|
(19,112,627 | ) | (19,112,627 | ) | |||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,099,639 | 777,674 | |||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
22,611,231 | 23,763,891 | |||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 211,656,973 | $ | 229,915,293 | |||
See
notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
29
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
|
||||||||||||||
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
Income:
|
||||||||||||||
Loans
receivable
|
$ 7,517,826
|
$ 9,770,332
|
||||||||||||
Securities
|
2,045,358
|
2,452,442
|
||||||||||||
Other
interest-earning assets
|
213,568
|
142,832
|
||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
9,776,752
|
12,365,606
|
||||||||||||
Interest
Expense:
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
3,015,281
|
4,181,951
|
||||||||||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
69,778
|
85,577
|
||||||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
181,183
|
1,175,562
|
||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
3,266,242
|
5,443,090
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
6,510,510
|
6,922,516
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
852,182
|
5,313,801
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income after
|
||||||||||||||
provision
for loan losses
|
5,658,328
|
1,608,715
|
||||||||||||
Non-interest
Income:
|
||||||||||||||
Service
charges and other fee income
|
1,510,334
|
1,907,418
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on the sale of loans
|
44,937
|
531,865
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of securities
|
-
|
142,783
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of property and equipment
|
||||||||||||||
and
real estate owned
|
35,257
|
24,011
|
||||||||||||
Write-down
on real estate owned
|
(181,115)
|
(265,654)
|
||||||||||||
Income
from bank-owned life insurance
|
15,064
|
150,616
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
110,908
|
165,476
|
||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
1,535,385
|
2,656,515
|
||||||||||||
Non-interest
Expense:
|
||||||||||||||
Compensation
and employee benefits
|
3,630,094
|
4,425,787
|
||||||||||||
Occupancy
and equipment
|
1,374,441
|
1,626,520
|
||||||||||||
Professional
fees
|
531,380
|
446,095
|
||||||||||||
Deposit
insurance premiums
|
603,419
|
256,157
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
1,497,530
|
3,078,882
|
||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
7,636,864
|
9,833,441
|
||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(443,151)
|
(5,568,211)
|
||||||||||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
1,040,931
|
(1,531,751)
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ (1,484,082)
|
$ (4,036,460)
|
||||||||||||
Basic
loss per share
|
$
(0.96)
|
$ (2.60)
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Diluted
loss per share
|
$
(0.96)
|
$
(2.60)
|
||||||||||||
See
notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||||||||||||||
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Accumulated
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Treasury
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||
Balances
at June 30, 2008
|
1,550,815
|
$
|
28,950
|
$
|
18,019,852
|
$
|
28,214,183
|
$
|
(19,112,627)
|
$
|
(50,786)
|
$
|
27,099,572
|
||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4,036,460)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,036,460)
|
||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
securities
available-for-sale, net of deferred
|
|||||||||||||||||||
income
taxes of $426,782
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
922,696
|
922,696
|
||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment net of deferred
|
|||||||||||||||||||
income
taxes of $48,547
|
(94,236)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
(3,208,000)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid ($0.10 per share)
|
(155,086)
|
(155,086)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
-
|
-
|
27,405
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
27,405
|
||||||||||||
Balances
at June 30, 2009
|
1,550,815
|
28,950
|
18,047,257
|
24,022,637
|
(19,112,627)
|
777,674
|
23,763,891
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,484,082)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,484,082)
|
||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
securities
available-for-sale, net of deferred
|
|||||||||||||||||||
income
taxes of $165,861
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
321,965
|
321,965
|
||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
(1,162,117)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
-
|
-
|
9,457
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,457
|
||||||||||||
Balances
at June 30, 2010
|
1,550,815
|
$
|
28,950
|
$
|
18,056,714
|
$
|
22,538,555
|
$
|
(19,112,627)
|
$
|
1,099,639
|
$
|
22,611,231
|
||||||
See
notes to the consolidated financial
statements
|
31
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
|
||||||
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$ (1,484,082)
|
$ (4,036,460)
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net
|
||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
552,515
|
658,854
|
||||
Amortization
|
50,114
|
50,115
|
||||
Net
premium amortization and (discount accretion) on
securities
|
(43,485)
|
(199,427)
|
||||
Stock
based compensation
|
9,457
|
27,405
|
||||
Gain
on sale of securities
|
-
|
(142,783)
|
||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
852,182
|
5,313,801
|
||||
Write
down on real estate owned
|
181,115
|
265,654
|
||||
Gain
on the sale of loans
|
(44,937)
|
(531,865)
|
||||
Proceeds
from the sale of loans originated for sale
|
1,576,243
|
23,883,603
|
||||
Loans
originated for sale
|
(691,130)
|
(23,036,252)
|
||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,672,924
|
(1,469,879)
|
||||
Gain
on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
||||
and
real estate owned
|
(39,236)
|
(9,993)
|
||||
(Gain)
loss on the sale of other repossessed assets
|
3,176
|
(14,018)
|
||||
Increase
in cash surrender value on bank-owned
|
||||||
life
insurance
|
(15,064)
|
(150,616)
|
||||
Net
change in operating accounts:
|
||||||
Accrued
interest receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets
|
330,674
|
150,243
|
||||
Deferred
loan costs
|
21,171
|
69,441
|
||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
121,608
|
(216,930)
|
||||
FDIC
insurance
|
(1,113,917)
|
(55,828)
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(602,227)
|
328,822
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
1,337,101
|
883,887
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||
Purchase
of certificates of deposit purchased
|
(8,725,856)
|
(5,256,669)
|
||||
Maturities
of certificates of deposit purchased
|
7,132,340
|
195,407
|
||||
Purchase
of securities available-for-sale
|
(36,691,737)
|
(24,756,669)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of securities available-for-sale
|
-
|
6,120,121
|
||||
Proceeds
from maturities of securities
|
||||||
available-for-sale
|
22,235,498
|
15,749,618
|
||||
Proceeds
from maturities of securities
|
||||||
held
to maturity
|
578,445
|
1,581,238
|
||||
Purchase
of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
-
|
(261,500)
|
||||
Proceeds
from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
1,146,800
|
293,900
|
||||
Net
(increase) decrease in loans receivable
|
19,716,395
|
26,161,802
|
||||
Proceeds
from surrender of bank owned life insurance
|
2,169,089
|
4,117,951
|
||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(248,035)
|
(502,403)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
313,471
|
84,257
|
||||
Capital
expenditures on real estate owned
|
(22,000)
|
-
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate owned and other repossessed
assets
|
1,526,908
|
1,261,270
|
||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
9,131,318
|
24,788,323
|
||||
Continued
|
32
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
|||||
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
|
|||||
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||
Net
change in deposits
|
$ (9,142,453)
|
$ (5,375,405)
|
|||
Net
change in retail repurchase agreements
|
(360,980)
|
1,065,795
|
|||
Payments
on borrowed funds
|
(7,000,000)
|
(19,000,000)
|
|||
Proceeds
from borrowed funds
|
-
|
7,000,000
|
|||
Cash
dividends paid
|
-
|
(155,086)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(16,503,433)
|
(16,464,696)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6,035,014)
|
9,207,514
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents -
|
|||||
Beginning
of period
|
26,217,607
|
17,010,093
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents -
|
|||||
end
of period
|
$ 20,182,593
|
$ 26,217,607
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||
Interest
on deposits and
|
|||||
other
borrowings
|
$ 3,448,021
|
$ 5,398,180
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$ (754,601)
|
$ -
|
|||
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and
|
|||||
financing
activities:
|
|||||
Loans
transferred to real estate owned
|
$ 3,888,976
|
$ 2,325,576
|
|||
See
notes to consolidated financial
statements
|
33
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of b
|
usiness
– First Bancshares, Inc., a Missouri corporation
(“Company”), was organized onSeptember 30, 1993 for the purpose
of becoming a unitary savings and loan holding company for First Home
Savings Bank (”Savings Bank”). The Savings Bank is primarily
engaged in providing a full range of banking and mortgage services to
individual and corporate customers in southern Missouri. The
Company and Savings Bank are also subject to the regulation of certain
federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
|
Principles o
|
f
consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include
the accountsof the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Savings
Bank and SCMG, Inc. (formerly South Central Missouri Title, Inc.) and the
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Savings Bank, Fybar Service Corporation
and First Home Investments. In consolidation, all significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
|
Estimates –
|
In
preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible
to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the
fair value of financial instruments, the allowance for loan losses and the
deferred tax valuation.
|
Segment re
|
porting
- An operating segment is defined as a component of a business for which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources
and evaluate performance. The Company has one operating segment, community
banking.
|
Consolidat
|
ed
statements of cash flows – For purposes of the consolidated statements of
cash flows, cash consists of cash on hand and deposits with other
financial institutions. Cash equivalents include highly-liquid
instruments with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash flows
from loans and deposits are reported
net.
|
Certificate
|
s
of deposit purchased – These are funds placed on deposit at other
financial institutions which mature in one year or less and do not, at any
one financial institution, aggregate to more than the insurance of
accounts limitation.
|
Securities
|
–
Securities which are designated as held-to-maturity are designated as such
because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities to
maturity. Such securities are reported at amortized
cost.
|
|
All
other securities are designated as available-for-sale, a designation which
provides the Company with certain flexibility in managing its investment
portfolio. Such securities are reported at fair value; net
unrealized gains and losses are excluded from income and reported net of
applicable income taxes as a separate component of stockholders’
equity.
|
34
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1)
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
|
Interest
income on securities is recognized on the interest method according to the terms
of the security. Gains or losses on sales of securities are recognized in
operations at the time of sale and are determined by the difference between the
net sales proceeds and the cost of the securities using the specific
identification method, adjusted for any unamortized premiums or discounts.
Premiums or discounts are amortized or accreted to income using the interest
method over the period to maturity.
Declines
in the fair value of equity securities below their amortized cost basis that are
deemed to be other-than-temporary impairment losses are reflected as realized
losses. To determine if an other-than-temporary impairment exists on
an equity security, the Company considers (a) the length of time and the extent
to which the fair value has been less than cost, (b) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer and (c) the intent and ability of the Company
to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow
for an anticipated recovery in fair value. To determine if an
other-than-temporary-impairment exists on a debt security, the Company first
determines if (a) it intends to sell the security or (b) it is more likely than
not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated
recovery. If either of the conditions is met, the Company will
recognize an other-than-temporary-impairment in earnings equal to the difference
between the fair value of the security and its adjusted cost
basis. If neither of the conditions is met, the Company determines
(a) the amount of the impairment related to credit loss and (b) the amount of
the impairment due to all other factors. The difference between the
present values of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized sot
basis is the credit loss. The amount of the credit loss is included in the
consolidated statements of income as an other-than-temporary impairment on
securities and is an adjustment to the cost basis of the
security. The portion of the total impairment that is related to all
other factors is included in other comprehensive income (loss).
Federal Home
|
Loan
Bank stock - The Savings Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
(“FHLB”) system, is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of
the FHLB of Des Moines. The stock does not have a readily
determinable fair market value and, as such, is carried at cost and
evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 942-325-35. In accordance
with the guidance, the stock’s value is determined by the ultimate
recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary
declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be
recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (a) The
significance of the decline in net assets of the Federal Home Loan Bank as
compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time the situation
has persisted; (b) Commitments by the Federal home Loan Bank to make
payments in relation to the operating performance; (c) The impact of
legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the Federal
Home Loan Bank, and; (d) The liquidity position of the Federal Home Loan
Bank.
|
Prepaid insur
|
ance
assessment – In November 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) adopted a final rule amending the assessment regulations to require
depository institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based assessment
for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The
payment of $1.6 million, which was made December 30, 2009, was recorded as
a prepaid asset and is being amortized over the assessment
period.
|
Loans receiv
|
able –
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the
foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their
principal amount outstanding, net of deferred
loan
|
35
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1)
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
|
origination
fees and certain direct costs. Loan origination fees and certain
direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized in interest income
over the contractual lives of the related loans using the interest
method. When a loan is paid-off, the unamortized balance of these
deferred fees and costs is recognized in income.
Interest
income on loans is recognized on the effective interest method.
A loan is
considered to be delinquent when payments are not made according to the
contractual terms, typically evidenced by non-payment of a monthly installment
by the date the installment is due.
The
accrual of interest on other homogeneous loans is discontinued at the time the
loan is 90 days delinquent, unless the credit is well secured and in the process
of collection. Other personal loans are typically charged off no later than 180
days delinquent. The accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued
when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful of
collection, or when interest or principal is past due 90 days or
more. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis
method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Any accrued but
uncollected interest previously recorded on such loans is generally reversed in
the current period and interest income is subsequently recognized upon
collection.
Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably
assured.
Allowance for
|
loan
losses – The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are
estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to
earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when
management believes the collectability of a loan balance is unlikely.
Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance.
|
|
The
allowance is an amount management believes will be adequate to absorb probable
losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of
the collectability of loans and prior loss experience. The allowance for loan
losses includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic
310, Receivables and
allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Accounting for
Contingencies. The level of the allowance reflects
management’s continuing evaluations of delinquencies, charge-offs and
recoveries, loan volumes and terms, changes in underwriting procedures, depth of
the Company’s lending management, national and local economy, industry
conditions, credit concentrations, and other external factors, including
competition and legal and regulatory requirements, as well as trends in the
foregoing.
A loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that the Savings Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments
of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting
scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that
experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not
classified as
36
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1)
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
|
impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a
case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the
reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of
the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest
owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for all loans by
either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value
of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Loans held for
|
sale
– Loans held for sale are originated and intended for sale on the
secondary market on a loan by loan basis with terms established with both
the borrower and the investor prior to commitment and closing. Funding by
the investor, based on the established terms, generally takes place in
three to four weeks. Loans held for sale are carried at cost, which
approximates fair value, due to the short term nature of the loans. Gains
on loans sold are recognized based on the net cash flow of each sale.
Loans are generally sold with servicing rights
released.
|
Property and e
|
quipment
and related depreciation – Land is stated at cost. Property and equipment
are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Property
and equipment depreciation is principally computed by applying the
following methods and estimated
lives:
|
Category | Estimated Life | Method | ||
Automobiles | 5 Years | Straight-line | ||
Office furniture, fixtures | ||||
and equipment | 3-10 Years | Straight-line | ||
Buildings | 15-40 Years | Straight-line | ||
Investment real estate | 15-40 Years | Straight-line |
Intangible ass
|
ets
– The intangible asset relates to customer relationships that were
acquired in connection with the acquisition of two
branches. The premium paid by the Savings Bank for the branches
is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15
years.
|
Bank-owned l
|
ife
insurance – Bank-owned life insurance is carried at its cash surrender
value. Changes in cash surrender value are recorded in
non-interest income.
|
Income taxes
|
– Deferred
taxes are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method whereby
deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences
and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards and deferred tax
liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary
differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of
enactment. As a result of the Company’s operating results over the five
year period ended June 30, 2010, management provided a valuation allowance
for the deferred tax assets of both the Company and the Savings Bank as of
June 30, 2010.
|
37
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1)
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
|
On of
July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the accounting standard on accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes, which addresses the determination of whether tax
benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on tax returns should be recorded in
the financial statements. Under this guidance, the Company may recognize the tax
benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it more-likely-than-not that the
tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based
on the technical merits of the tax position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest
benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. The guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes also
includes de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes,
and accounting in interim periods. The Company recognizes interest and penalties
on income taxes as a component of income tax expense. As a result of the
Company’s evaluation of the implementation of this guidance, no significant
income tax uncertainties were identified. Therefore, the Company recognized no
adjustment for unrecognized income tax benefits during the years ended June 30,
2010 and June 30, 2009.
|
The
Company is no longer subject to U. S. federal or state and local income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal
2008.
|
Real estate ow
|
ned
and repossessed assets – Includes real estate and other assets acquired in
the settlement of loans, which is recorded at the estimated fair value
less the estimated costs to sell the asset. Any write down at
the time of foreclosure/repossession is charged against the allowance for
loan losses. Subsequently, net expenses related to holding the
property and declines in the market value are charged against
income.
|
Earnings per s
|
hare
– Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or resulted in the issuance
of common stock that would share in the earnings of the
Company. Dilutive potential common shares are added to weighted
average shares used to compute basic earnings per share. The
number of shares that would be issued from the exercise of stock options
has been reduced by the number of shares that could have been purchased
from the proceeds at the average market price of the Company’s
stock.
|
Comprehensiv
|
e income
– Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue,
expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although
certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and
losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate
component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along
with net income, are components of comprehensive
income.
|
Employee sto
|
ck
options – The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans which
are described more fully in Note 10, Employee Benefit
Plans.
|
Compensation
costs for all stock-based awards are measured at fair value on the grant date
and are recognized over the requisite service period for awards expected to
vest. Management makes an estimate of expected forfeitures and
recognizes compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to
vest. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to
38
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
|
estimate
the fair value of stock option grants. Cash flows resulting
from the tax benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost
recognized for those options are presented as financing cash
flows.
|
Revenue recog
|
nition
– Deposit account transaction fees and other ancillary non-interest income
related to the Savings Bank’s deposit and lending activities are
recognized as services are
performed.
|
Transfers of fin
|
ancial
assets – Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales only
when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when: (1) the assets have
been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right to
pledge or exchange the assets it received, and no condition both
constrains the transferee from taking advantage of its right to pledge or
exchange and provides more than a modest benefit to the transferor, and
(3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred
assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or
the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific
assets.
|
Impairment of l
|
ong-lived
assets – Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment
to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of
the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets.
|
New accountin
|
g standards
– Accounting Standards
Codification. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became effective on July 1,
2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of
authoritative U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)
applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities,
superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (“AICPA”), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related
literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority
federal securities laws are also sources of GAAP for SEC registrants. All
other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to
the ASC affects the way companies refer to U. S. GAAP in financial
statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC
involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the
Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph
structure.
|
FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments – Debt and Equity
Securities,” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320,
“Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” (i) changes existing guidance for
determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and
(ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it
has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with
a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell
the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the
security before the recovery of its cost basis. Under ASC Topic 320, declines in
the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their
costs that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as
realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The
amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive income. The Company adopted the provisions of the new
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320
39
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
during
fiscal year 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not significantly impact the
Company’s financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation.” New
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” amended
prior guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Under ASC Topic 810, a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary,
which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in
the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the
consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, ASC Topic 810
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It
also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of
the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
non-controlling interest. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC
Topic 810 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Further
new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810 amends prior guidance
to change how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently
capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate
an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a
company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entity’s economic performance. The new authoritative accounting
guidance requires additional disclosures about the reporting entity’s
involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk
exposure due to that involvement as well as its effect on the entity’s financial
statements. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810 became
effective January 1, 2010 and has not had a significant impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures,” New authoritative accounting guidance
under ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” affirms that the
objective of fair value when the market price of an asset is not active is the
price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and
clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been
a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that
asset is not active. ASC Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion
about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The
new accounting guidance amended prior guidance to expand certain disclosure
requirements. The Company adopted the new authoritative accounting guidance
under ASC Topic 820 during the first fiscal quarter of 2010. Adoption of the
guidance did not significantly impact the Company’s financial
statements.
Further
new authoritative accounting guidance (Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-5)
under ASC Topic 820 provides guidance for measuring the fair value of a
liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available. In such instances, a reporting entity is
required to measure fair value utilizing a valuation technique that uses (i) the
quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) quoted
prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or
(iii)
40
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
another
valuation technique that is consistent with the existing principles of ASC Topic
820, such as an income approach or market approach. The new authoritative
accounting guidance also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a
liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or
adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that
prevents the transfer of the liability. The foregoing new authoritative
accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 became effective for the Company’s
financial statements beginning October 1, 2009 and has not had a significant
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820); Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures on transfers into and out of Level 1
and 2 measurements of the fair value hierarchy and requires separate disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3
measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures relating to the
level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair
value. It is effective for the first reporting period (including interim
periods) beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to
provide the Level 3 activity of purchase, sales, issuances, and settlements on a
gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2010. The adoption of this pronouncement has not had a significant impact on
the Company’s financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial
Statements,” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 825,
“Financial Statements,” requires an entity to provide disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim financial information and amends prior
guidance to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. The new interim disclosures required under Topic 825
are included in Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements.
FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent
Events,” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 855,
“Subsequent Events,” establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Events occurring
subsequent to June 30, 2010, have been evaluated as to their potential impact to
these financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and
Servicing,” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 860,
“Transfers and Servicing,” amends prior accounting guidance to enhance reporting
about transfers of financial assets, including securitizations, and where
companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial
assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance eliminates the concept of a
“qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance also
requires additional disclosures about all continuing involvements with
transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses from
transfers during the period. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC
Topic 860 became effective January 1, 2010 and has not had a significant impact
on the Company’s financial statements.
In April
2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When
the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset—a consensus
of the FASB Emerging
41
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(1)
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
|
Issues Task Force (Topic
310). ASU No. 2010-18 clarifies that a creditor should not
apply specific guidance in ASC 310, Receivables, 40, Troubled Debt Restructurings by
Creditors, to acquired loans accounted for as a pooled asset under ASC
310-30, Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. However,
that guidance in ASC 310-30 continues to apply to acquired loans within the
scope of ASC 310-30 that a creditor accounts for individually. This
amended guidance is effective for a modification of a loan(s) accounted for
within a pool under ASC 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period
ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amended guidance must be
applied prospectively, and early application is permitted. Upon
initial application of the amended guidance, an entity may make a one-time
election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under ASC
310-30. An entity may make the election on a pool-by-pool
basis. The election does not preclude an entity from applying pool
accounting to future acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The
implementation of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
(2) SECURITIES
A summary
of the securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2010 is as
follows:
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||
United States Government and | ||||||||
Federal agency obligations | $ | 26,652,246 | $ | 375,853 | $ | - | $ | 27,028,099 |
Obligations of states and | ||||||||
political subdivisions | 130,000 | 2,064 | - | 132,064 | ||||
Mutual funds | 17,952 | - | - | 17,952 | ||||
Federal agency residential | ||||||||
mortgage-backed securities | 31,580,162 | 1,418,516 | (130,314) | 32,868,364 | ||||
Common and preferred stocks | 258,000 | - | - | 258,000 | ||||
Total | $ | 58,638,360 | $ | 1,796,433 | $ | (130,314) | $ | 60,304,479 |
A summary
of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2010 is as
follows:
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||
Obligations of states and | ||||||||
political subdivisions | $ | 1,442,742 | $ | 34,961 | $ | (187) | $ | 1,477,516 |
Federal agency residential | ||||||||
mortgage-backed securities | 570,198 | 24,370 | - | 594,568 | ||||
Total | $ | 2,012,940 | $ | 59,331 | $ | (187) | $ | 2,072,084 |
The
amortized cost and estimated market value of securities at June 30, 2010, by
contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will
differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call
or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
42
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(2)
SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
Available for Sale | ||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair Value | |||
Due in one year or less | $ | 20,000 | $ | 20,136 |
Due after one year through five years | 10,996,126 | 11,207,850 | ||
Due after five years through ten years | 14,766,120 | 14,928,737 | ||
Due after ten years | 1,000,000 | 1,003,440 | ||
Subtotal | 26,782,246 | 27,160,163 | ||
Mutual funds | 17,952 | 17,952 | ||
Federal agency residential | ||||
mortgage-backed securities | 31,580,162 | 32,868,364 | ||
Common and preferred stocks | 258,000 | 258,000 | ||
Total | $ | 58,638,360 | $ | 60,304,479 |
Held to Maturity | ||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair Value | |||
Due in one year or less | $ | 269,974 | $ | 272,680 |
Due after one year through five years | 969,914 | 1,002,170 | ||
Due after five years through ten years | 202,854 | 202,666 | ||
Subtotal | 1,442,742 | 1,477,516 | ||
Federal agency residential | ||||
mortgage-backed securities | 570,198 | 594,568 | ||
Total | $ | 2,012,940 | $ | 2,072,084 |
A summary
of the securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2009 is as
follows:
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||
United States Government and | ||||||||
Federal agency obligations | $ | 8,506,234 | $ | 110,311 | $ | (7,480) | $ | 8,609,065 |
Obligations of states and | ||||||||
political subdivisions | 150,000 | 975 | - | 150,975 | ||||
Mutual funds | 19,904 | - | - | 19,904 | ||||
Federal agency residential | ||||||||
mortgage-backed securities | 35,204,373 | 1,126,185 | (51,698) | 36,278,860 | ||||
Common and preferred stocks | 258,000 | - | - | 258,000 | ||||
Total | $ | 58,638,360 | $ | 1,237,471 | $ | (59,178) | $ | 45,316,804 |
A summary of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2009 is as
follows:
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||
Obligations of states and | ||||||||
political subdivisions | $ | 1,703,035 | $ | 29,062 | $ | (1,208) | $ | 1,730,889 |
Federal agency residential | ||||||||
mortgage-backed securities | 888,475 | 13,326 | (6,584) | 895,217 | ||||
Total | $ | 2,591,510 | $ | 42,388 | $ | (7,792) | $ | 2,626,106 |
43
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(2)
|
SECURITIES
(CONTINUED)
|
The
following tables present the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the
Company’s securities with unrealized losses aggregated by category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, at June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Available
for Sale as of June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
|||
Federal
agency
|
||||||||
residential
mortgaged
|
||||||||
-backed
securities
|
$3,092,027
|
$(121,661)
|
$324,307
|
$
(8,653)
|
$3,416,334
|
$(130,314)
|
||
Total
temporarily
|
||||||||
impaired
securities
|
$3,092,027
|
$(121,661)
|
$ 324,307
|
$ (8,653)
|
$3,416,334
|
$(130,314)
|
||
Held
to Maturity as of June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
|||
Obligations
of states
|
||||||||
and
political
|
||||||||
subdivisions
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$
202,666
|
$ (187)
|
$ 202,666
|
$ (187)
|
||
Total
temporarily
|
||||||||
impaired
securities
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$
202,666
|
$ (187)
|
$ 202,666
|
$ (187)
|
Available
for Sale as of June 30, 2009
|
||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
|||
United
States
|
||||||||
Government
and
|
||||||||
Federal
Agency
|
||||||||
Obligations
|
$3,002,500
|
$(7,480)
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$3,002,500
|
$(7,480)
|
||
Federal
agency
|
||||||||
residential
mortgaged
|
||||||||
-backed
securities
|
1,580,242
|
(14,501)
|
512,235
|
(37,197)
|
2,092,477
|
(51,698)
|
||
Total
temporarily
|
||||||||
impaired
securities
|
$4,582,742
|
$(21,981)
|
$512,235
|
$(37,197)
|
$5,094,977
|
$(59,178)
|
44
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(2)
|
SECURITIES
(CONTINUED)
|
Held
to Maturity as of June 30, 2009
|
||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
(Losses)
|
|||
Obligations
of states
|
||||||||
and
political
|
||||||||
Subdivisions
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$
202,019
|
$ (1,288)
|
$ 202,666
|
$ (1,208)
|
||
Federal
agency
|
||||||||
residential
mortgaged
|
||||||||
-backed
securities
|
173,519
|
(5,028)
|
134,470
|
(187)
|
307,989
|
(6,584)
|
||
Total
temporarily
|
||||||||
impaired
securities
|
$ 173,519
|
$ (5,028)
|
$
336,489
|
$ (187)
|
$ 510,008
|
$ (7,792)
|
The
Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a periodic
basis. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than cost, and the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the
Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the Federal government
or its agencies or sponsored entities, whether downgrades by bond rating
agencies have occurred, and the results of review of the issuer’s financial
condition.
For all
of the above securities, the unrealized losses are generally due to changes in
interest rates and not from deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer
and, as such, are considered temporary. In addition, the Company the intent and
ability to hold these investment securities for a period of time sufficient to
allow for an anticipated recovery. Investment categories above include the
following number of individual securities with gross losses for 12 months or
more at June 30, 2010: Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
- One; Obligations of states and political subdivisions -
One
The
following table presents proceeds from sales of securities and the gross
realized securities gains and losses.
June 30, | ||||
2010 | 2009 | |||
Proceeds from sales | $ | - | $ | 6,120,121 |
Realized gains | $ | - | $ | 142,783 |
Realized (losses) | - | - | ||
Net realized | $ | - | $ | 142,783 |
The
carrying value of securities pledged on retail repurchase agreements at June 30,
2010 and June 30, 2009 was $6,518,000 and $7,006,000, respectively.
45
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(3) LOANS
RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable at June 30 consisted of the following:
2010
|
2009
|
||
Residential
real estate
|
$
60,217,252
|
$
71,140,655
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
34,572,677
|
39,816,588
|
|
Land
|
4,358,033
|
7,395,477
|
|
Loans
to depositors, secured by savings accounts
|
1,181,204
|
1,164,602
|
|
Consumer
and automobile loans
|
1,670,353
|
2,800,247
|
|
Second
mortgage loans
|
4,468,596
|
4,899,841
|
|
Commercial
business loans
|
4,489,728
|
9,816,666
|
|
Overdrafts
|
38,098
|
79,078
|
|
Total
gross loans
|
110,995,941
|
137,113,154
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(2,526,862)
|
(4,185,326)
|
|
Loans
in process
|
-
|
(1,195)
|
|
Unamortized
deferred loan costs, net of
origination
fees
|
214,302
|
235,473
|
|
Net
loans receivable
|
$108,683,381
|
$133,162,106
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows for the years
ended June
30:
2010
|
2009
|
|||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$
|
4,185,326
|
$
|
2,796,836
|
Provision
charged to income
|
852,182
|
5,313,801
|
||
Charge-offs
|
(2,914,620)
|
(4,171,171)
|
||
Recoveries
|
253,974
|
245,860
|
||
Transfer
from reserve on Letters of Credit
|
150,000
|
-
|
||
Balance
at end of year
|
$
|
2,526,862
|
$
|
4,185,326
|
The
Savings Bank primarily originates loans to customers throughout southern
Missouri. The loans are typically secured by real estate or personal
property.
46
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(3)
|
LOANS RECEIVABLE
(CONTINUED)
|
Loans
receivable at June 30, 2010 and 2009 that are past 90 days due or non-accrual
consist of the following:
June
30,
|
||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||
Past
due 90 days or more and still accruing interest
|
$ |
-
|
$
|
288,255
|
Non-accrual
|
3,927,197
|
3,023,647
|
||
$ |
3,927,197
|
$
|
3,311,902
|
The
following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:
June
30,
|
||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
9,155,119
|
$
|
10,325,380
|
Total
impaired loans without an allowance
|
$
|
1,627,010
|
$
|
1,455.333
|
Total
impaired loans with an allowance
|
$
|
7,528,109
|
$
|
8,870,047
|
Valuation
allowance related to impaired loans
|
$
|
1,236,518
|
$
|
3,143,447
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||
Average
investment in impaired loans
|
$
|
7,039,932
|
$
|
6,028,491
|
Interest
income recognized on impaired loans
|
$
|
318,894
|
$
|
96,402
|
Interest
income recognized on a cash basis
|
||||
On
impaired loans
|
$
|
299,447
|
$
|
94,759
|
The
corrected disclosure above related to total impaired loans as of June 30, 2009
reflects that impaired loans have been increased by approximately $7.0 million
from the amount reported in our previously issued 2009 annual report. In
addition, the valuation allowance related to impaired loans as of June 30, 2009
has been increased by approximately $2.1 million from the amount reported in our
previously issued 2009 annual report. However, there has been no
adjustment to the total allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2009.
These $7.0 million of loans were evaluated by management as impaired in
the prior year and the calculated specific allowance was included in the total
allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2009.
As
described in Note 1, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to
the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include
non-performing commercial loans and can also include loans modified in troubled
debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers
experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction
in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal,
forbearance or other action intended to maximize collection.
Included
in impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) totaling $2.8 million
at June 30, 2010. These troubled debt restructurings were performing in
accordance with their modified terms at June 30, 2010. There are no significant
commitments for additional funding on any of the loans that are TDRs at June 30,
2010.
47
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(4) PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at June 30 consists of the
following:
2010 | ||||||
Category |
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Net | |||
Land | $ | 643,704 | $ | - | $ | 643,704 |
Buildings | 5,912,409 | 2,586,224 |
3,326,185
|
|||
Office furniture, fixtures | ||||||
and equipment | 4,422,335 |
3,485,481
|
936,854
|
|||
Automobiles | 132,530 |
96,060
|
36,470
|
|||
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|||
Total | $ |
12,856,790
|
$ |
6,805,367
|
$ |
6,051,423
|
2009 | ||||||
Category |
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Net | |||
Land | $ | 643,704 | $ | - | $ | 643,704 |
Buildings | 5,874,079 | 2,404,076 |
3,470,003
|
|||
Office furniture, fixtures | ||||||
and equipment | 4,231,316 |
3,200,682
|
1,030,634
|
|||
Automobiles | 132,530 |
70,379
|
62,151
|
|||
Investment real estate |
|
|
|
|||
Total | $ |
13,022,810
|
$ |
6,353,437
|
$ |
6,669,373
|
Depreciation
charged to operations for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $552,515
and $658,854, respectively.
The
Savings Bank’s full-service branch office in Springfield is leased. The lease on
the Springfield full-service branch office was assumed and it has five years
remaining on the initial term. The Savings Bank also leases three ATM drive-up
kiosks located in the parking lots of a major retailer in Mountain Grove,
Marshfield and Ava, Missouri. These leases were entered into in the third
quarter of fiscal 2008, and were for a four year term. During fiscal 2009, the
Savings Bank acquired, at a sheriff’s sale, the small strip mall in which its
Theodosia branch office is located. The operations of the Loan Origination
Office, which was also located in Springfield, were discontinued in mid-June
2009. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2009, the Savings Bank, through a local
realtor, found a new tenant, and negotiated a buy-out on the remaining term of
the lease. The cost of the buyout totaled approximately $57,000.
Minimum future lease payments for the Springfield, Missouri branch office and
the three leased ATMs for the years ending June 30 are as follows:
2655
South
|
||||||||
Campbell
|
||||||||
ATMs
|
Springfield,
MO
|
Totals
|
||||||
2011
|
$
64,620
|
$
90,528
|
$155,148
|
|||||
2012
|
64,620
|
90,528
|
155,148
|
|||||
2013
|
43,080
|
90,528
|
133,608
|
|||||
2014
|
-
|
90,528
|
90,528
|
|||||
2015
|
-
|
90,528
|
90,528
|
|||||
Thereafter
|
-
|
3,772
|
3,772
|
|||||
Total
|
$172,320
|
$456,412
|
$628,732
|
48
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(4) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
(CONTINUED)
Rent
expense for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $172,571 and $220,370,
respectively.
(5)
INTANGIBLE
ASSET
A summary of the intangible asset at June 30 is as
follows:
2010 | 2009 | |||
Premium on branch acquisition | $ | 1,020,216 | $ | 1,020,216 |
Accumulated amortization | (884,975) |
(834,861)
|
||
Net premium on branch acquisition | $ | 135,241 | $ | 185,355 |
|
Amortization
expense relating to this premium was $50,114 for the year ended June 30,
2010 and $50,115 for the year ended June 30,
2009.
|
|
Estimated
future amortization expense is as follows for the years ending June
30:
|
2011 | $ 50,115 | |
2012 | 50,115 | |
2013 | 35,011 | |
$ 135,241 |
(6)
|
DEPOSITS
|
|
A
summary of deposit accounts at June 30 is as
follows:
|
2010 | 2009 | ||
Non-interest-bearing
checking
|
$ 11,773,833
|
$ 14,739,628
|
|
Interest-bearing
checking
|
34,632,542
|
32,484,889
|
|
Super
Saver money market
|
11,379,774
|
11,778,495
|
|
Savings
|
9,086,554
|
9,315,558
|
|
Money
Market savings accounts
|
36,031,680
|
34,711,303
|
|
Certificates
of Deposit
|
77,171,042
|
86,188,005
|
|
Total
|
$180,075,425
|
$189,217,878
|
The
aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of
$100,000 was $25,760,428 and $28,730,992 at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
At June
30, 2010, scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as
follows:
Fiscal
|
2011
|
$ 55,853,279
|
|
2012 | 10,558,851 | ||
2013 | 4,706,477 | ||
2014 | 3,464,573 | ||
2015 | 2,572,862 | ||
Thereafter | 15,000 | ||
$ 77,171,042 |
49
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(7)
|
RETAIL REPURCHASE
AGREEMENTS
|
|
The
Savings Bank offers retail repurchase agreements as an additional item in
its product mix. Retail repurchase agreements allow customers to have
excess checking account balances “swept” from the checking accounts into a
non-insured interest bearing account. The customers’ investment in these
non-insured accounts is collateralized by securities of the Savings Bank
pledged at FHLB for that purpose.
|
|
(8)
ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL
HOME LOAN BANK AND OTHER BRROWED MONEY
|
The
advances listed below were obtained from the FHLB of Des
Moines. The advances are secured by FHLB stock and a blanket
pledge of qualifying one-to-four family mortgage
loans. Advances from the FHLB at June 30 are summarized as
follows:
|
2010 |
Weighted
Average
Rate
|
2009 | Weighted
Average
Rate
|
|||||||
Term Advances: | ||||||||||
Long-term; fixed-rate; | ||||||||||
callable quarterly | $ | - | - | % | $ | - | - | % | ||
Short-term, fixed-rate, | ||||||||||
Non-callable | - | - | 7,000,000 | 1.12 | ||||||
Long-term; fixed-rate; | ||||||||||
non-callable | 3,000,000 | 4.94 | 3,000,000 | 4.94 | ||||||
Total | $ | 3,000,000 | 4.94 | % | $ | 10,000,000 | 3.05 | % |
As of
June 30, 2010 the fixed-rate term advance shown above were subject to a
prepayment fee equal to 100 percent of the present value of the monthly lost
cash flow to the FHLB based upon the difference between the contract rate on the
advance and the rate on an alternative qualifying investment of the same
remaining maturity. Advances may be prepaid without a prepayment fee
if the rate on an advance being prepaid is equal to or below the current rate
for an alternative qualifying investment of the same remaining
maturity.
Maturities
of FHLB advances are as follows:
Year Ended June 30
|
Aggregate
Annual
Maturities
|
|
2011 | $ | - |
2012 | - | |
2013 | - | |
2014 | 3,000,000 | |
$ | 3,000,000 |
At June
30, 2010, the Savings Bank had irrevocable letters of credit issued on its
behalf from the FHLB totaling $1,845,000, as collateral for public entity
deposits in excess of federal insurance limits. The letters of credit
expire through April 2011. At June 30, 2010, the Savings Bank had collateralized
borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $30.7 million.
While the
Company had no outstanding borrowed money from other lenders as of June 30,
2010, the Company does have available a $5.0 million line of credit from another
financial institution.
50
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(9) INCOME
TAXES
The provision for income taxes
(benefit) for the years ended June 30 is as follows:
2010 | 2009 | |||
Current | $ | (631,992) | $ | (61,872) |
Deferred | 1,672,923 | (1,469,879) | ||
Total | $ | 1,040,931 | $ | (1,531,751) |
The
provision for income taxes (benefit) differs from that computed at the statutory
corporate rate, 34%, for the years ended June 30 as follows:
2010
|
2009
|
||
Tax
at statutory rate
|
$ (150,671)
|
$(1,893,192)
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|||
State
taxes, net of federal benefit
|
(7,682)
|
(34,725)
|
|
Tax-exempt
income
|
(24,206)
|
(32,873)
|
|
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
46,671
|
355,451
|
|
Dividends
received deduction
|
(2,979)
|
(2,851)
|
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
1,126,326
|
15,722
|
|
Stock
based compensation
|
3,215
|
9,318
|
|
Net
effect of other book/tax differences
|
50,257
|
51,399
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
$1,040,931
|
$(1,531,751)
|
The
components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2010 and 2009
consisted of:
2010 | 2009 | ||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 932,648 | $ | 1,603,916 | |
Book amortization in excess of tax amortization | 17,873 | 19,882 | |||
Compensated employee absences | 24,385 | 29,157 | |||
State net operating loss carry-forwards | 89,788 | 89,500 | |||
Federal net operating loss carry-forwards | 917,858 | 852,964 | |||
Capital loss carry-forwards | - | 1,080 | |||
Charitable contributions | 21,162 | 14,937 | |||
Other | 130,956 | 99,649 | |||
Total gross deferred tax assets | 2,134,670 | 2,711,085 | |||
Valuation allowance | (1,216,906) | (90,580) | |||
$ | 917,764 | $ | 2,620,505 | ||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||
Premises and equipment | $ | (86,747) | $ | (107,737) | |
FHLB stock dividends | (60,936) | (60,936) | |||
Prepaid expenses | (124,308) | (125,313) | |||
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | (566,481) | (400.619) | |||
Unamortized deferred loan costs, net of fees | (79,292) | (87,125) | |||
Total gross deferred tax liabilities | $ | (917,764) | $ | (781,720) | |
Total net deferred tax assets | $ | - | $ | 1,838,785 |
51
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(9) INCOME TAXES
(CONTINUED)
In
accordance with FASB ASC Topics 740-10 and 740-30, a deferred tax liability has
not been recognized for tax basis bad debt reserves of $2,190,825 of the Savings
Bank that arose in tax years that began prior to December 31,
1987. At June 30, 2010, the amount of the deferred tax liability that
had not been recognized was approximately $811,000. This deferred tax
liability could be recognized if, in the future, there is a change in federal
tax law, the Savings Bank fails to meet the definition of a “qualified savings
institution,” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, certain distributions are
made with respect to the stock of the Savings Bank, or the bad debt reserves are
used for any purpose other than absorbing bad debts.
During
the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded a valuation
allowance of $1,216,906 and $90,580, respectively. As of June 30, 2010,
management has provided a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets
as a result of the Company’s cumulative net losses for the last five
years. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary
differences and carry forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable
income.
At June
30, 2010. the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately
$3,129,000 which are available to offset future taxable income through
2029.
(10) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLANS
|
The
Savings Bank had participated in a multiple-employer defined benefit
pension plan covering substantially all employees. In fiscal
2006, the Savings Bank opted to freeze the plan. Participants in the plan
became entitled to their vested benefits at the date it was frozen. The
Savings Bank limited its future obligations to the funding amount required
by the annual actuarial evaluation of the plan and administrative costs.
No participants will be added to the plan. Pension expense for the years
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $72,000 and $47,000,
respectively. This plan is not subject to the requirements of
FASB ASC Topics 715 and 958.
|
The First
Home Savings Bank Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) Plan covers all employees
that are age 21 and have completed six months of service. The Company
makes contributions on a matching basis of up to 3% on employee deferrals.
Expense for the ESOP and 401(k) plan for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
was $49,976 and $51,136, respectively.
|
Effective
July 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB ASC Topics 718 and 505,
Share-based Payments, using the modified prospective transition method.
Prior to that date the Company accounted for stock option awards under APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. In
accordance with
FASB ASC Topics 718 and 505, compensation expense for stock-based awards
is recorded over the vesting period at the fair values of the award at the
time of the grant. The recording of such compensation
began on July 1, 2006 for shares not yet vested as of that date and for
all new grants subsequent to that date. The exercise price of options
granted under the Company’s incentive plans is equal to the fair market
value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The Company assumes no
projected forfeiture rates on its stock-based
compensation.
|
52
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(10)
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
(CONTINUED)
|
The
Company’s 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan has authorized the grant of
options to certain officers, employees and directors for up to 100,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock. All options granted have 10 year terms and vest and
become exercisable ratably over five years following the date of
grant. The plan was approved by shareholders in October 2004. At June
30, 2010, there were 78,000 shares of stock available for grant under the
plan
|
The
Company’s 2004 Management Recognition Plan has authorized the award of
shares to certain officers, employees and directors for up to 50,000
shares of the Company’s common stock. All shares awarded will
have a restricted period to be determined by the Corporation’s
Compensation Committee. The restricted period shall not be less
than three years if the award is time based, or not less than one year if
performance based. The plan was approved by shareholders in
October 2004. No shares have been issued from this
plan.
|
The
Company uses historical data to estimate the expected term of the options
granted, volatilities, and other factors. Expected volatilities
are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over
a period of time equal to the expected life of the option. The risk-free
rate for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The dividend rate is equal to the dividend rate in
effect on the date of grant. The Company used the following
assumptions for the most recent grants made, which were in fiscal 2007,
respectively: dividend rates of .00% to .99%, price volatility
of 18.36% to 20.29%, risk-free interest rates of 4.58% to 5.02%, and an
expected life of 7.5 to 10 years. The weighted average grant date fair
value for options granted in fiscal 2007, the last year options were
granted, was $5.92 per share. No options were granted during either fiscal
2010 or fiscal 2009.
|
|
A
summary of the Company’s stock option activity, and related information
for the years ended June 30
follows:
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||
Exercise
|
Exercise
|
|||||||
Options
|
Price
|
Options
|
Price
|
|||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
22,000
|
$ 16.85
|
60,500
|
$ 16.72
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
(38,500)
|
16.64
|
||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
22,000
|
16.85
|
22,000
|
16.85
|
||||
Exercisable
at end of year
|
15,600
|
$ 16.83
|
11,200
|
$ 16.83
|
53
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(10) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
(CONTINUED)
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Outstanding at
June
30
|
Number
Exercisable at
June
30
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(Months)
|
|||||
$ | 17.50 | 2,000 | 1,600 | 68 | ||||
17.00 | 10,000 | 6,000 | 81 | |||||
16.78 | 10,000 | 8,000 | 72 |
As of
June 30, 2010, there was $6,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested share-based compensation agreements granted under the plan. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 8 months.
|
There
is no intrinsic value of vested options on Company stock as of June 30,
2010.
|
(11)
|
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
|
The
following information shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and
the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive
potential common stock. The amounts in the income columns represent
the numerator and the amounts in the shares columns represent the denominator.
There was no dilutive effect since the exercise price of all stock options at
June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010 exceeded the market price of the Company’s
common shares on both of those dates.
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Per
|
Per
|
||||||||||
Share
|
Share
|
||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||
Basic
EPS:
|
|||||||||||
Income
(loss) available
|
|||||||||||
to
common
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders
|
$(1,484,082)
|
1,550,815
|
$(
0.96)
|
$(4,036,463)
|
1,550,815
|
$(
2.60)
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive
|
|||||||||||
securities:
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Diluted
EPS:
|
|||||||||||
Income
(loss) available
|
|||||||||||
to
stockholders
|
|||||||||||
plus
stock options
|
$(1,484,082)
|
1,550,815
|
$(
0.96)
|
$(4,036,463)
|
1,550,815
|
$
(2.60)
|
(12)
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
Certain
employees, officers and directors are engaged in transactions with the Savings
Bank in the ordinary course of business. It is the Savings Bank’s
policy that all related party transactions are conducted at “arm’s length” and
all loans and commitments included in such transactions are made on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other
customers.
54
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(12)
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
|
A summary
of the changes in outstanding loans to officers and directors for the fiscal
years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
2010 | 2009 | |||
Beginning balances | $ | 104,792 | $ | 222,608 |
Originations and advances | 92,000 | - | ||
Principal repayments | (70,810) | (117,816) | ||
Ending balances | $ | 125,982 | $ | 104,792 |
The
Company has one director whose law firm performs legal services, primarily on
behalf of the Savings Bank. These legal services relate primarily to
foreclosures and bankruptcies. During the years ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, the Savings Bank paid $86,660 and $79,967, respectively, for legal
services performed by this director’s law firm.
The
Company also has one director with ownership interests in a number of related
companies that purvey lumber and hardware, and provide other related services.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Savings Bank made purchases of goods
and services from four of the related companies totaling $8,936.
(13) COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
In
the ordinary course of business, the Savings Bank has various outstanding
commitments that are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. The principal commitments of the Savings
Bank are as follows:
|
|
Letters
of Credit – Outstanding standby letters of credit were approximately
$132,000 and $437,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
Loan
Commitments – The Savings Bank had outstanding firm commitments to
originate loans of $594,000 and $121,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
Lines
of Credit – The unused portion of lines of credit was approximately $3.4
million and $6.5 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may
require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each
customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral
obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based
on management’s credit evaluation of the party. Collateral held
varies, but may include accounts receivable, crops, livestock, inventory,
property and equipment, residential and commercial real estate as well as
income-producing commercial properties.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee
the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are
primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including
commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions.
55
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
(13) COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
None of
the guarantees extend longer than one year. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers. Collateral held varies as specified above
and is required in instances which the Company deems necessary. All
of the standby letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2010 were
collateralized. No amounts were recorded as liabilities at June 30,
2010 or 2009 for the Company’s potential obligations under these
guarantees.
In the
normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings.
In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings
would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
(14) CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT
RISK
The
Savings Bank maintains its primary bank accounts with institutions in Missouri
and Iowa. On June 30, 2010, the individual balances of these accounts
exceeded standard insurance limits established by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The Savings Bank has not experienced any losses in such
accounts.
(15) REGULATORY
MATTERS
|
The
Savings Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by its primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision (“OTS”). Failure to meet the minimum regulatory
capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible
additional discretionary, actions by regulators that if undertaken, could
have a direct material affect on the Savings Bank and the consolidated
financial statements. Under the regulatory capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Savings Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative
measures of the Savings Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Savings Bank’s capital amounts and
classification under the prompt corrective action guidelines are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings, and other factors.
|
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the
Savings Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table
below) of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
(as defined in the regulations), Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets (as
defined), and tangible capital to adjusted total assets (as
defined).
Management
believes, as of June 30, 2010, that the Savings Bank meets all capital adequacy
requirements to which it is subject.
As of
June 30, 2010, the most recent notification from the OTS, the Savings Bank was
categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Savings
Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and core capital
leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or
events since that notification that management believes have changed the
institution’s category.
56
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(15)
|
REGULATORY
MATTERS (CONTINUED)
|
The
Savings Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the
table.
Actual |
Minimum
For
Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
|
Minimum
to Be
Well-Capitalized
Under
Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions
|
|||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2010: | |||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 21,419 | 19.99 | % | $ | 8,572 | 8.0 | % | $ | 10,715 | 10.0 | % | |||
Core Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Adjusted Tangible Assets) | 20,153 | 9.65 | % | 8,354 | 4.0 | % | 10,443 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Tangible Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Adjusted Tangible Assets) | 20,153 | 9.65 | % | 3,133 | 1.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) | 20,153 | 18.81 | % | 4,286 | 4.0 | % | 6,429 | 6.0 | % | ||||||
As of June 30, 2009: | |||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 22,737 | 17.57 | % | $ | 10,351 | 8.0 | % | $ | 12,939 | 10.0 | % | |||
Core Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Adjusted Tangible Assets) | 21,140 | 9.32 | % | 9,071 | 4.0 | % | 11,339 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Tangible Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Adjusted Tangible Assets) | 21,140 | 9.32 | % | 3,402 | 1.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | |||||||||||||||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) | 21,140 | 16.34 | % | 5,176 | 4.0 | % | 7,763 | 6.0 | % |
On August
17, 2009, the Company and the Bank each entered into a Stipulation and Consent
to the Issuance of Order to Cease and Desist with the OTS.
Under the
terms of the OTS orders, the Bank and the Company, without the prior written
approval of the OTS, may not:
· Increase
assets during any quarter;
· Pay
dividends;
· Increase
brokered deposits;
· Repurchase
shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock; and
· Issue
any debt securities or incur any debt (other than that incurred in the normal
course of business).
Other
material provisions of the order require the Bank and the Company
to:
·
|
develop
a business plan for enhancing, measuring and maintaining profitability,
increasing earnings, improving liquidity, maintaining capital levels,
acceptable to the OTS;
|
·
|
ensure
the Bank’s compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations and agency
guidelines, including the terms of the
order;
|
57
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(15)
|
REGULATORY MATTERS
(CONTINUED)
|
·
|
not
appoint any new director or senior executive officer or change the
responsibilities of any current senior executive officers without
notifying the OTS;
|
·
|
not
enter into, renew, extend or revise any compensation or benefit agreements
for directors or senior executive
officers;
|
·
|
not
make any indemnification, severance or golden parachute
payments;
|
·
|
enhance
its asset classification policy;
|
·
|
provide
progress reports to the OTS regarding certain classified
assets;
|
·
|
submit
a comprehensive plan for reducing classified
assets;
|
·
|
develop
a plan to reduce its concentration in certain loans contained in the loan
portfolio and that addresses the assessment, monitoring and control of the
risks association with the commercial real estate
portfolio;
|
·
|
not
enter into any arrangement or contract with a third party service provider
that is significant to the overall operation or financial of the Bank, or
that is outside the normal course of business;
and
|
·
|
prepare
and submit progress reports to the OTS. The OTS orders will remain in
effect until modified or terminated by the
OTS.
|
All
customer deposits remain insured to the fullest extent permitted by the FDIC.
The Bank expects to continue to serve its customers in all areas including
making loans, establishing lines of credit, accepting deposits and processing
banking transactions. Neither the Company nor the Bank admitted any wrongdoing
in entering into the respective Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a
Cease and Desist Order. The OTS did not impose or recommend any monetary
penalties.
For
additional information regarding the terms of the orders, please see our Form
8-K that we filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009. Further, we may be subject to
more severe future regulatory enforcement actions, including but not limited to
civil money penalties, if we do not comply with the terms of the
order.
(16)
COMMON
STOCK
As
provided in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, record holders of Common
Stock who beneficially own, either directly or indirectly, in excess of 10% of
the Company’s outstanding shares are not entitled to any vote with respect to
the shares they hold in excess of the 10% limit.
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
Effective
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820-10,
"Fair Value Measurements," for financial assets and financial liabilities. In
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820-10," the Company delayed application of FASB
ASC Topic 820-10 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured
on a non-recurring basis, until July 1, 2009. FASB ASC Topic
820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements.
The fair
value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A
fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or
transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or
liability
58
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
or, in
the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to
measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for
transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure
to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing
activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets
and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers
and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent,
(ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to
transact.
Valuation
techniques require the use of inputs that are consistent with the market
approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses
prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving
identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses
valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings,
to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on
the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of
an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently
applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be
observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the
reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best
information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy for
valuation inputs gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1
Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date.
Level 2
Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These
might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit
risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3
Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or
liabilities that reflect an entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
A
description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair
value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were
applied to all of the Company's financial assets and financial liabilities
carried at fair value effective July 1, 2008.
In
general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such
quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally
developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based
parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial
instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Company's creditworthiness, among other
things, as well as unobservable parameters.
59
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
Any such
valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company's
valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be
indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While
management believes the Company's valuation methodologies are appropriate and
consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or
assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could
result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities
Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at
fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For equity securities,
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are utilized to
determine fair value at the measurement date. For all other
securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent
pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may
include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield
curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment
speeds, credit information and the bond's terms and conditions, among other
things.
Impaired
Loans. The Company does not record impaired loans at fair value on a recurring
basis. However, periodically, a loan is considered impaired and is
reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to
sell, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Impaired loans
measured at fair value typically consist of loans on non-accrual status and
loans with a portion of the allowance for loan losses allocated specifically to
the loan. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 inputs, including recent
appraisals and Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria. As a
result of the significance of the Level 3 inputs, impaired loans fair values
have been classified as Level 3.
Real
Estate Owned. Real estate owned represents property acquired through
foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower
of the principal amount of the loan outstanding at the time of acquisition, plus
any acquisition costs, or the estimated fair value of the property, less
disposal costs. The Company considers third party appraisals, as well as,
independent fair value assessments from realtors or persons involved in selling
real estate owned in determining the fair value of particular properties.
Accordingly, the valuation of real estate owned is subject to significant
external and internal judgment. The Company periodically reviews real estate
owned to determine whether the property continues to be carried at the lower of
the recorded book value or the fair value of the property, less disposal costs.
As such, the Company classifies real estate owned subjected to non-recurring
fair value adjustments as Level 3.
The
following tables summarize financial assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, segregated by the level
of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair
value:
60
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
June 30, 2010
|
Level
1
Inputs
|
Level
2
Inputs
|
Level 3
Inputs
|
Total
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.
S. Agency Securities
|
$5,100
|
$21,928
|
|
$ -
|
$27,028
|
||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage-
|
|||||||||||||||||
backed
Securities
|
-
|
32,868
|
-
|
32,868
|
|||||||||||||
Municipal
Securities
|
-
|
132
|
-
|
132
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
276
|
-
|
276
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$5,100
|
$55,204
|
$ -
|
$60,304
|
|
|||||||||||
June
30, 2009
|
Level
1
Inputs
|
Level
2
Inputs
|
Level 3
Inputs
|
Total
Fair Value
|
|||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|||||||||||
U.
S. Agency Securities
|
$ -
|
|
$ 8,609
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 8,609
|
||||
Residential
mortgage-
|
|||||||||||
backed
Securities
|
-
|
36,279
|
-
|
36,279
|
|||||||
Municipal
Securities
|
-
|
151
|
-
|
151
|
|||||||
Other
|
-
|
278
|
-
|
278
|
|||||||
Total
|
$ -
|
$45,317
|
$ -
|
$45,317
|
Certain
financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on
an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain
circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Financial
assets and financial liabilities, excluding impaired loans, measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis were not significant at June 30,
2010.
The
following tables summarize financial assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, segregated by the
level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to
measure fair value:
June
30, 2010
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Impaired
Loans
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$8,360
|
|
$8,360
|
|||
Real
estate owned
|
-
|
-
|
3,885
|
3,885
|
||||||
Other
repossessed assets
|
61
|
61
|
||||||||
Total
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$7,282
|
$7,282
|
61
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
June
30, 2009
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Impaired
Loans
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
$ 611
|
|
$ 611
|
||||
Real
estate owned
|
-
|
-
|
1,549
|
1,549
|
||||||
Other
repossessed assets
|
158
|
158
|
||||||||
Total
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$2,318
|
$2,318
|
Non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
include reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill
impairment test. Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis include non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at
fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, as well as
intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair
value for impairment assessment.
.
ASC Topic
820-10, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair
value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial
assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair
value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies
for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed
above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial
liabilities are discussed below.
June
30, 2010
|
||||
Approximate
Carrying
|
Approximate
|
|||
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|||
Financial
assets:
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
20,183,000
|
$
|
20,183,000
|
Certificates
of deposit purchased
|
7,222,000
|
7,222,000
|
||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
60,304,000
|
60,304,000
|
||
Held-to-maturity
securities
|
2,013,000
|
2,072,000
|
||
Investment
in FHLB stock
|
434,000
|
434,000
|
||
Loans,
net of allowance for loan losses
|
108,683,000
|
109,417,000
|
||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
820,000
|
820,000
|
||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||
Deposits
|
180,075,000
|
180,946,000
|
||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
5,352,000
|
5,352,000
|
||
FHLB
advances
|
3,000,000
|
3,402,000
|
||
Accrued
interest payable
|
203,000
|
203,000
|
62
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
June
30, 2009
|
||||
Approximate
Carrying
|
Approximate
|
|||
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|||
Financial
assets:
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
26,218,000
|
$
|
26,218,000
|
Certificates
of deposit purchased
|
5,628,000
|
5,628,000
|
||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
45,317,000
|
45,317,000
|
||
Held-to-maturity
securities
|
2,592,000
|
2,626,000
|
||
Investment
in FHLB stock
|
1,581,000
|
1,581,000
|
||
Loans,
net of allowance for loan losses
|
133,162,000
|
134,947,000
|
||
Loans
held for sale
|
820,000
|
820,000
|
||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
955,000
|
955,000
|
||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||
Deposits
|
189,218,000
|
190,096,000
|
||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
5,713,000
|
5,713,000
|
||
FHLB
advances
|
10,000,000
|
10,450,000
|
||
Accrued
interest payable
|
385,000
|
385,000
|
||
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents and certificates of deposit purchased – For these
short-term instruments, the carrying amount approximates fair
value.
Loans r
|
eceivable
– The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash
flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining
maturities. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for purposes
of the calculations.
|
|
Loans h
|
eld
for sale – The carrying amounts of loans held for sale approximate the
fair value due to the short term nature of these
loans.
|
Investm
|
ent
in FHLB stock – Fair value of the Savings Bank’s investment in FHLB stock
approximates the carrying value as no ready market exists for this
investment and the stock could only be sold back to the FHLB at
par.
|
Accrued
interest – The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair
value.
Deposits
|
–
The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and interest-bearing
demand deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(i.e., their carrying amount). The fair value of fixed-maturity
time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that
applies the market rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
|
Retail re
|
purchase
agreements – The fair value of retail repurchase agreements is the amount
payable at the reporting date.
|
FHLB a
|
dvances
– Rates currently available to the Savings Bank for advances with similar
terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing
advances by discounting the future cash
flows.
|
63
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(17)
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
(CONTINUED)
|
Commit
|
ments
to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit – The fair value
of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into
similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the
agreements and the present credit worthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value
also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and
the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit and
lines of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements
or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations
with the counterparties at the reporting date and are
insignificant.
|
|
(18)
|
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
The
following condensed statements of financial condition and condensed
statements of operations and cash flows for First Bancshares, Inc. are as
follows:
|
Condensed
Statements of Financial Condition
|
||||
June
30,
|
||||
ASSETS
|
2010
|
2009
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ 233,958
|
$ 102,882
|
|||
Certificates
of deposit
|
10,000 | 10,000 | |||
Securities
available-for-sale
|
248,000
|
248,000 | |||
Investment
in subsidiaries
|
21,402,171 |
22,224,633
|
|||
Property
and equipment, net
|
1,108,209
|
1,462,881
|
|||
Real
estate owned
|
75,600 |
-
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
-
|
183,163 | |||
Other
assets
|
51,490
|
169,611
|
|||
Total assets | $23,129,428 |
|
$24,401,170
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|||||
Notes
payable, subsidiaries
|
$ 501,588
|
|
$ 623,717
|
||
Accrued
expenses
|
16,609
|
13,562
|
|||
Total
Liabilities
|
518,197
|
637,279
|
|||
Stockholders'
equity
|
22,611,231
|
23,763,891
|
|||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$23,129,428
|
|
$24,401,170
|
64
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(18)
|
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(CONTINUED)
|
Condensed
Statements of Operations
|
||||||
Year
ended June 30,
|
||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||
Income:
|
||||||
Equity
in loss of subsidiaries
|
$ (1,108,365)
|
|
$(3,852,354)
|
|||
Interest
and dividend income
|
12,665
|
8,642
|
||||
Gain/(loss)
on sale or write-down
of
property and equipment
|
-
|
(3,044)
|
||||
Other
|
31,209
|
56,358
|
||||
Total
income (loss)
|
(1,064,491)
|
(3,790,398)
|
||||
Expenses:
|
||||||
Professional
fees
|
106,294
|
193,474
|
||||
Printing
and office supplies
|
7,504
|
15,429
|
||||
Interest
|
40,634
|
53,616
|
||||
Other
|
84,218
|
66,279
|
||||
Income
tax benefit
|
180,941
|
(82,736)
|
||||
Total
expenses
|
419,591
|
246,062
|
||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ (1,484,082)
|
|
$(4,036,460)
|
65
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Years
Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(18)
|
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(CONTINUED)
|
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||||
Year
ended June 30.
|
|||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ (1,484,082)
|
|
$(4,036,460)
|
||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to
|
|||||||||
net
cash provided from operating activities:
|
|||||||||
Equity
in earnings of subsidiaries
|
1,153,884
|
4,552,354
|
|||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
56,476
|
60,676
|
|||||||
(Gain)/loss
on sale or write down
of
property and equipment
|
-
|
3,044
|
|||||||
Net
change in operating accounts:
|
|||||||||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
183,163
|
(93,025)
|
|||||||
Other
assets and liabilities
|
121,169
|
(323,635)
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
30,610
|
162,954
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(15,276)
|
(63,003)
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales of property and equipment
|
313,471
|
84,257
|
|||||||
Purchase
of real estate owned
|
(75,600)
|
-
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
222,595
|
21,254
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
on notes payable
|
(122,129)
|
(12,764)
|
||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
-
|
(155,086)
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(122,129)
|
(167,850)
|
||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
131,076
|
16,358
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents-beginning of period
|
102,882
|
86,524
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents-end of period
|
|
$ 233,958
|
|
$
102,882
|
66
FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
COMMON
STOCK INFORMATION
The
common stock of First Bancshares, Inc. is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
under the symbol “FBSI”. As of September 15, 2010, there were 430
registered stockholders and 1,550,815 shares of common stock
outstanding. This does not reflect the number of persons or entities
who hold stock in nominee or “street name.”
At its
February 2007 meeting, the Board of Directors decided to suspend dividend
payments until the Company’s earnings improved. As a result, there were no
dividend payments made during fiscal 2008. Primarily as a result of the
operating results for fiscal 2008, on July 31, 2008, the Board of Directors
declared a special dividend of $0.10 per share payable on August 29, 2008 to
stockholders of record on August 15, 2008. There were no dividend payments
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
Dividend
payments by the Company are dependent on its cash flows, which include
reimbursement from its subsidiaries for the income tax savings created by its
stand alone operating loss, the operation of real estate owned by the Company
and dividends received by the Company from the Savings Bank. Under
Federal regulations, the dollar amount of dividends a savings and loan
association may pay is dependent upon the association’s capital position and
recent net income. Generally, if an association satisfies its
regulatory capital requirements, it may make dividend payments up to the limits
prescribed in the OTS regulations. However, institutions that have
converted to stock form of ownership may not declare or pay a dividend on, or
repurchase any of, its common stock if the effect thereof would cause the
regulatory capital of the institution to be reduced below the amount required
for the liquidation account which was established in accordance with the OTS
regulations and the Savings Bank’s Plan of Conversion. The Cease and Desist
orders to both the Company and the Savings Bank require a 30 day advance
notification to the OTS of the proposed dividend and receipt of a non-objection
letter from the OTS. In addition, under Missouri law, the Company is
generally prohibited from declaring and paying dividends at a time when the
Company’s net assets are less than its stated capital or when the payment of
dividends would reduce the Company’s net assets below its stated
capital.
The
following table sets forth market price and dividend information for the
Company’s common stock.
Fiscal 2010 | High | Low | Dividend |
First Quarter | $12.48 | $7 .33 | N/A |
Second Quarter | $ 8.97 | $ 7.28 | N/A |
Third Quarter | $10.95 | $ 6.80 | N/A |
Fourth Quarter | $ 9.70 | $ 8.30 | N/A |
Fiscal 2009 | High | Low | Dividend |
First Quarter | $16.99 | $11.33 | $0.10 |
Second Quarter | $15.95 | $10.26 | N/A |
Third Quarter | $15.64 | $ 8.08 | N/A |
Fourth Quarter | $14.90 | $ 6.12 | N/A |
67
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
FIRST BANCSHARES, INC. | FIRST HOME SAVINGS BANK |
DIRECTORS:
Thomas M. Sutherland, Chairman
One of the owners and operators of
Sutherlands
Home Improvement Centers group of stores
|
DIRECTORS:
Thomas M. Sutherland, Chairman
One of the owners and operators of
Sutherlands
Home Improvement Centers group of
stores
|
D. Mitch
Ashlock
Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer
First Federal Savings Bank of Olathe
|
D. Mitch Ashlock
Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer
First Federal Savings Bank of Olathe
|
Harold F.
Glass
Partner
Millington, Glass & Love, Attorneys at
Law
|
Harold F.
Glass
Partner
Millington, Glass & Love, Attorneys at
Law
|
Billy E.
Hixon
Retired partner from regional CPA firm
of BKD, LLP
|
Billy E.
Hixon
Retired partner from regional CPA firm
of BKD, LLP
|
Robert J.
Breidenthal
Director
Security Bank of Kansas City
|
Robert J.
Breidenthal
Director
Security Bank of Kansas City
|
John G.
Moody
Elected Official
|
John G.
Moody
Elected Official
|
OFFICERS: | OFFICERS: |
Thomas M.
Sutherland,
Chief Executive Officer
|
Thomas M.
Sutherland
Chief Executive Officer
|
Lannie E.
Crawford
President
|
Lannie E.
Crawford
President
|
Ronald J.
Walters, CPA
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
|
Ronald J.
Walters, CPA
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
|
Dale W.
Keenan
Executive Vice President
|
Dale W.
Keenan
Executive Vice President and
Senior Lending Officer
|
Shannon
Peterson
Secretary
|
Shannon
Peterson
Secretary
|
68
CORPORATE
INFORMATION
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS | TRANSFER AGENT |
142 East
First Street
P.O. Box 777
Mountain Grove,
Missouri 65711
|
Registrar
and Transfer Company
10 Commerce Drive
Cranford, New Jersey 07016
(800) 866-1340
|
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | |
McGladrey
& Pullen, LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
GENERAL COUNSEL |
Traded on
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Nasdaq Symbol: FBSI
|
Harold F.
Glass
Springfield, Missouri
|
|
SPECIAL
COUNSEL
|
|
Breyer
& Associates PC
McLean, Virginia
|
|
ANNUAL
MEETING
The
Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held Friday, November 19, 2010, at 1:00
p.m., Central Time, at the Days Inn Conference Room, 300 East 19th
Street, Mountain Grove, Missouri.
FORM
10-K
A COPY OF
THE FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WILL BE
FURNISHED WITHOUT CHARGE TO STOCKHOLDERS AS OF THE RECORD DATE FOR VOTING AT THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY, FIRST
BANCSHARES, INC., P.O. BOX 777, MOUNTAIN GROVE,
MISSOURI 65711.
THE
COMPANY’S FORMS 10-K, 10-Q AND OTHER DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE SEC HOME PAGE ON THE
WORLD WIDE WEB AT http://www.sec.gov.
69