UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
file number
001-33540
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1987014
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin
|
|
53051
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
|
|
(262) 253-9800
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
NYSE
Amex
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting
company x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ¨ No
x
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates, computed by
reference to the last sales price on December 31, 2009, which was the last
business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
was $14,609,833.
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of Common
Stock, as of the latest practicable date. 16,558,078 Common Shares ($0.01 par
value) as of September 8, 2010.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
In Part
III, portions of the registrant’s 2010 Proxy Statement to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the Registrant’s fiscal
year end.
Part
III – Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14
|
|
In
the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in connection with its 2010
annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission no later than October 28, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Part
IV - Certain exhibits listed in response to Item 15(a)
|
|
Prior
filings made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
2010 FORM
10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
PART
I
|
3
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
3
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
11
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
17
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
17
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
17
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
17
|
PART II
|
|
18
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
|
18
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
18
|
Item 7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.(restated)
|
18
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
|
26
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
27
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
47
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
47
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
47
|
PART III
|
48
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
48
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
48
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
48
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
48
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
48
|
PART IV
|
|
49
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
49
|
Signatures
|
50
|
PART
I
Forward-Looking
Statements
The following
discussion should be read in conjunction with our accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto included within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form
10-K and the following discussion contain statements that are not historical
facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking
statements contain projections of our future results of operations or of our
financial position or state other forward-looking information. In some cases you
can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,”
“believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will” and
“would” or similar words. We believe that it is important to communicate our
future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future
that we are not able to accurately predict or control and that may cause our
actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our
forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to rely on
forward-looking statements because they involve risks and uncertainties, and
actual results may differ materially from those discussed as a result of various
factors, including, but not limited to: the risk that unit
orders will not ship, be installed and/or convert to revenue, in whole or in
part; the cost and timing of developing our products and our ability to raise
the necessary capital to fund such development costs; the cost and availability
of raw materials for our products; market acceptance of ourZESS50 and PECC
systems; our ability to establish and maintain relationships with third parties
with respect to product development, manufacturing, distribution and servicing
and the supply of key product components; the cost and availability of
components and parts for our products; our ability to develop commercially
viable products; our ability to reduce product and manufacturing costs; our
ability to improve system reliability for both ZESS50 and PECC; our ability to
successfully expand our product lines; competitive factors, such as price
competition and competition from other traditional and alternative energy
companies; our ability to manufacture products on a large-scale commercial basis
our ability to protect our intellectual property; the cost of complying with
current and future federal, state and international governmental regulations;
the impact of deregulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry on
demand for ZBB Energy’s products; and other risks and uncertainties discussed
under Item IA—Risk Factors. Readers should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date on which the statements were made and are not guarantees of future
performance. Except as may be required by applicable law, we do not undertake or
intend to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Item
1.
Business
ZBB Energy Corporation and its
operating subsidiaries (“ZBB,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) designs,
develops, manufactures and markets distributed intelligent power management
platforms that integrate all types of renewable and conventional power sources
with advanced large format storage technology. ZBB’s mission is to utilize these
integrated systems to transform intermittent renewable energy sources into
reliable power plants. ZBB
is deploying its modular power platforms both off-grid, and in the
“distribution” portion of the grid-operating near the loads and distributed
renewable energy systems. Our ZESS POWR™ platforms are essential components for
successful expansion of a truly smart grid with renewable energy. They enable
customers to easily configure an intelligent power system that maximizes return
on investment, power quality and grid stability simultaneously. ZBB is focused
on serving the military, commercial building, electric vehicle (EV) charging and
off-grid telecom market segments.
The
Company was incorporated under the laws of Wisconsin in 1998. The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its wholly
owned subsidiaries, ZBB Technologies, Inc. which operates a manufacturing
facility in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, and ZBB Technologies, Ltd. which has its
advanced engineering and development facility in Perth, Australia. Our Corporate
website address is www.zbbenergy.com.
Products
ZBB’s
intelligent power management platforms are modular and custom configured to meet
a specific customer energy need. The building blocks of a system include our
proprietary Power and Energy Control Center (ZESS POWR PECC) combined with our
proprietary zinc-bromide rechargeable flow battery (ZESS). We will also purchase
and integrate other types of advanced energy storage in order to optimize the
energy storage traits of the system. Lithium ion, advanced lead acid and
ultra-capacitors are examples of storage technologies that are synergistic with
our flow battery design.
The ZESS
POWR is modular both in terms of electrical interfaces and packaging design.
This allows our solutions to be configured into energy storage systems of any
size and integrated with or without any generating source. Our systems fully
integrate with customer control systems, smart-grid instructions and can be
remotely monitored. In addition, various control options are available for the
integration with the customer’s existing electrical power system or as a
completely independent power plant. The ZESS POWR system enables the customer to
store energy from any renewable or conventional energy source and discharge
power as needed to meet their load, regardless of the generation source or real
time status. Our energy storage solutions will enable expansion of renewable
energy use by solving key customer problems:
CUSTOMER
PROBLEM
|
|
ZESS
POWR SOLUTION
|
|
|
|
Wind
and sun are unreliable energy sources
|
|
ZESS
POWR stores renewable energy and feeds load as needed
|
|
|
|
Must
use dirty and expensive diesel gensets during grid outages or when no grid
is available
|
|
ZESS
POWR can operate as back-up power and as off grid power, reducing diesel
run-times or eliminating them all together
|
|
|
|
Grid
becomes unstable when wind stops or clouds blow over solar
panels
|
|
ZESS
POWR acts as a “shock absorber” to rapid swings in renewable energy
sources.
|
|
|
|
Grid
needs voltage support during peaks and has congestion on “feeder lines”
into high density areas
|
|
The
distributed storage and intelligent power management system of ZESS POWR
can be called upon to provide energy during peaks
|
|
|
|
Remote
off-grid or micro-grid systems do not have reliable and cost effective
power sources. Diesel fuel is too expensive.
|
|
ZESS
POWR integrates solar, wind, gensets with storage, and then manages all
power flows to deliver reliable
power.
|
Product
Benefits
Distributed
Energy Applications
As
penetration of distributed solar and wind energy grows, problems with managing
peak demands and sudden drops due to renewable intermittency are growing. One
way for a utility company to address challenges in the grid is by using energy
provided by energy storage systems. The term “distributed energy” generally
refers to the deployment of energy generation and energy storage resources in
the distribution network of the grid. These assets are sited near the load
centers where they can provide an immediate source of energy. For electric
utilities our products provide a means to augment the functionality and
performance of the smart grid on a localized basis.
Load
management
The ZESS
systems, when located near the customer, can be used to manage power and energy
either controlled by the customer or the utility as a smart grid application.
This results in cost savings and allows local integration of renewables and
provides regulated distributed generation.
Power
quality
ZESS
systems provide a means to alleviate power quality problems by supplying active
and reactive power locally to stabilize voltage surges and sags. The scale of
the avoided costs is a major value driver for using distributed ZESS systems in
conjunction with the grid.
Benefits
to renewable energy generators
Renewable
energy generators would use our ZESS systems to manage the power and energy of
the intermittent nature of the renewable energy and dispatch as needed.
Distributed renewable energy sources such as wind and solar are interconnected
to the grid for optimal usage. ZESS systems enhance the value of distributed
renewable resources by providing energy management. ZESS systems can operate as
back-up power for grid outages, displacing diesel gensets and their associated
problems.
Competitive
Advantages
Since our
systems combine both advanced power electronics and storage technology, we
compete with both established power electronics platforms and multiple energy
storage technologies, such as lead acid batteries, Lithium ion batteries,
vanadium redox flow batteries and sodium sulfur batteries. We believe that the
benefits delivered by our POWR PECC system are unmatched in the industry, and
that our ability to integrate with storage to deliver an intelligent solution to
our customers gives us a distinct competitive advantage. For our target markets,
we believe our product has the following significant advantage over competing
products and technologies:
|
·
|
Modular Construction:
The ZESS flow battery is built in 50 kWh modules and the POWR PECC is
designed with standardized electronics modules. This allows the system to
be architected specifically to customer’s needs and easily modified to fit
future needs like EV charging.
|
|
·
|
Turnkey Solution: A
customer can outline their system requirements and we can deliver an
expandable solution that is “plug and
play”
|
|
·
|
Intelligent Direct Current (DC)
Buss on POWR PECC: Enables simple management of multiple power
inputs, multiple storage types, and any dynamic load profile. Also enables
simple expansion for future needs.
|
|
·
|
Energy density relative to lead
acid batteries or vanadium redox: A larger amount of energy can be
stored in a system of a given weight and size (measured in Watt Hours per
Kilogram or Wh/kg), recharge cycle and overall cycle
life.
|
|
· |
Lower cost than lithium
ion: It is unlikely that the Li ion storage will ever be sold for
less than about $600/kW-hr, whereas we expect that our flow
batteries will reach the $300-$400/kW-hr price range depending on size and
power electronics.
|
Markets
We
believe that our ZESS products are available at a time when major changes are
occurring in electricity supply and demand. We anticipate that the primary users
of our energy storage systems will be utility companies at the distribution
level, commercial/industrial users and off-grid applications. Our systems are
usually combined with renewable energy (solar, wind) and other power
generators.
Key areas
for the use of ZESS systems include:
|
·
|
On
and off grid wireless telecom towers installations that use renewable
energy to reduce or eliminate diesel run
time;
|
|
·
|
Off
grid power generation systems;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
military
and remote village power |
|
·
|
Commercial
and residential building integration with renewables and/or back-up power
needs; and
|
|
·
|
Small
community power systems and
micro-grids.
|
ZBB
technology enables alternative energy growth and deployment. Specifically, we
address the following issues in our target markets:
Renewable
Energy
ZESS
systems provide the necessary means to control intermittent renewable power
generation and to optimize energy utilization. They also allow photovoltaic (PV)
technology to store energy when the sun is shining and provide power when
sunlight is limited. Additionally, ZESS systems can be used to store power from
solar panels and shift the distribution of that power to align with the
customers’ needs.
The ZESS
system can also work in conjunction with distributed wind turbines to manage the
power and energy of the intermittent nature of wind.
As
penetration of renewable energy increases on the utility grid, the intermittent
nature will have negative impact on grid stability. Integrating distributed ZESS
systems eliminates this problem and allows wind and solar generation to become a
dependable power source.
Smart
Grid
|
·
|
The
goal of the Smart Grid is to maximize the efficiency and reliability of
the existing infrastructure and accommodate the continued integration of
renewable power resources.
|
|
·
|
Evolution
of the Smart Grid will depend on cost effective energy storage. Smart grid
without smart storage equals “dumb
grid”.
|
ZESS
deployment is the key to establishing “off-grid” and “smart-grid” electrical
systems. Since emission producing diesel generator sets are polluting, costly to
maintain and fuel costs are expected to rise, interest in renewable generation
for off-grid and back-up power applications has been accelerating. A combination
of ZESS systems with renewable energy sources being deployed as an integrated
solution, results in a reliable turn-key system capable of being independent
from the utility grid or as a smart-grid solution. Such systems can be used
anywhere including remote areas of the world where either no electricity exists
or where there are severe outages through poor supply and inconsistent delivery,
or for any consumer who prefers to be grid independent.
Commercial
Users
ZESS
systems can be charged during low cost off-peak periods when energy rates (kWh)
and peak demand charges (kW) are low and can be discharged during higher cost
on-peak hours. Demand charges (per kWh) and the differential between on peak and
off peak charges (per kW) are two of many factors in the cost/benefit analysis
of the ZESS. The economic advantages result from the reduction of peak
demand/capacity charges deferred during on peak hours and the difference in
energy prices from off peak to on peak.
Utility
Applications for Distribution Network Support
The ZESS
systems have distribution benefits to assist power sources that are constricted
by a maximum amount of power distribution capacity. When located near the end
user, the stored energy is used to supplement the load demand, reducing the
stress on the distribution network and/or preventing overloads that may cause
blackouts or brownouts as well in addition to potentially eliminating the need
to upgrade the distribution system supplying the customer load.
Market
Opportunities and Challenges
There is
little argument that intelligent energy storage is needed to scale renewable
energy on the grid. The renewable energy markets are growing quickly and
approaching saturation in markets like Hawaii and California. This will rapidly
increase the served available market for our products. Many places around the
world do not have a grid or have serious reliability issues. These segments need
cost effective, reliable renewable power sources for many basic needs like clean
water, refrigeration, communication and lighting.
The
primary challenge for the intelligent storage industry is meeting the lifecycle
cost and reliability targets needed for these markets. In our segments, it is
believed that broad adoption will require a sale price around $500/kW-hr. In
addition, the operating specifications needed to meet our customer’s
requirements, like military, can be severe.
We
continue to advance the sales and marketing process in the areas of network
structure, direct key accounts, strategic relationships, marketing and
industry/policy involvement. We continue to build a direct market pipeline of
opportunities which include companies involved in renewable energy; renewable
energy integrators involved in on-grid and off-grid applications, government
facilities, telecom, and other commercial and industrial
opportunities.
We have
advanced the ZBB presence and awareness in the market through involvement in
various conferences (energy storage, wind, solar and electric utility), direct
marketing, marketing materials and web content, as well as continued efforts in
media channels and highly visible applications.
Current
and recently completed projects include the following:
As
announced on September 8, 2010, we will partner with SunPower Corp. (Nasdaq:
SPWRA, SPWRB) to establish a pilot program for demonstrating integration of
advanced energy storage systems with existing PV systems for commercial
customers. Working with a major retailer, SunPower and ZBB will demonstrate the
economic and operational benefits of combining PV with a ZBB zinc bromide flow
battery storage technology platform rated at 500 KWh in a commercial building
application.
We have
received an order for ZESS 50 energy storage system(s) and ZESS POWR PECC
from:
|
o
|
SEI
for the integration of solar PV with energy storage for an on grid
dispatchable power plant for use at a US government
facility.
|
|
o
|
NIDON
for the integration of solar PV with energy storage for an elevator system
that utilizes power from the grid and renewable energy in “Pulani Manor”,
a mid rise, multi-family apartment located near downtown Honolulu. This
system will manage the energy usage from a 20kW PV array and allows the
elevator to be operated during emergency situations and extended power
outages. The scalability of the ZESS system enables future input and
storage from other renewable energy
sources.
|
|
o
|
BC
Hydro to be utilized as part of a demonstration project that uses multiple
components (power generation, utilization, storage, and dispatch
optimization) to provide electrical power to an isolated remote area grid
with the goal of reducing reliance on diesel generation and the reduction
of greenhouse gas emissions in remote communities in British Columbia. The
project objective is to increase the utilization of BC Hydro’s Clayton
Falls small hydro plant and reduce the reliance on diesel generators at
its Ah Sin Heek generating facility
|
|
o
|
General
Atomics to be utilized as a demonstration project at its headquarters in
San Diego, California. This fully integrated ZESS power system will be
used in an on-grid configuration with photovoltaic (PV) renewable energy
generation inputs and multiple connection points for both AC and DC power
requirements that will connect to the host building’s power distribution
system. The ZESS POWR PECC system controls energy and power inputs,
directs energy flow to and from energy storage, regulates clean power to
various demonstration loads, and when available, sends excess energy to
the sites larger electrical distribution
system.
|
|
·
|
The
development of a prototype off grid system consisting of ZESS 50 energy
storage and ZESS POWR PECC hybrid for cell tower application in Africa via
ZBB partner Likusasa.
|
|
·
|
The
shipment of a ZESS 500 in conjunction with existing wind energy assets at
the Dundalk Institute of Technology in the Republic of
Ireland.
|
|
·
|
The
deployment of the ZBB Hybrid ZESS POWR PECC and ZESS 50 energy storage to
Oregon State University for the advanced study of energy storage with wind
power.
|
|
·
|
Installation
of an order with Envinity, a renewable system integrator, for the delivery
of two ZESS 50 energy storage devices and ZESS POWR PECC designed to
integrate two solar PV arrays, ten wind turbines, a hydro generator, and a
conventional generator to provide a single output power plant for an off
grid application.
|
|
·
|
Completion
of a $230,000 funded project with the Wisconsin Energy Independence Fund
for the development of our own proprietary power conversion systems for
both AC to DC and DC to DC renewable energy
applications;
|
|
·
|
Research
and development project (Advanced Electricity Storage Technologies
project) with the Commonwealth of Australia represented by and acting
through the Department of Environment and Water Resources (the
“Department”) which included the production and delivery of one 500kWh
energy storage system for installation into a renewable energy site in
Australia. Under this contract which will be completed on September 30,
2010 the Department agreed to provide funding to us for the development of
an energy storage system that will be used to demonstrate the storage and
supply of renewable energy generated from photovoltaic solar panels and
wind turbines already operational at the Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organization’s Newcastle Energy Centre in New South
Wales, Australia. We received a total of $2.4 million (A$2.9 million) in
project funding under this contract through June 30,
2010.
|
ZBB is in
the process of furthering these marketing and networking efforts with additional
marketing activities that will continue to raise the profile of ZBB and the ZESS
brands.
We have
designed our products so that they can be combined for use in commercial storage
applications and/or integrated with renewable energy sources through the use of
the ZBB hybrid power electronics. Federal and State Government initiatives to
lessen the United States greenhouse gas emissions and dependency on oil and
increasing concerns surrounding CO2 emissions
are helping to drive this market sector.
We
believe that solar and wind energy production has grown over the past five years
and will continue to grow for so long as fossil fuel prices are increasing and
global warming is viewed as a threat to the environment. Because both solar and
wind are intermittent primary energy sources, both grid connected and off-grid
installations require energy storage devices to optimize their capabilities and
in many cases the energy storage devices are a necessity for the utilization of
renewable energy.
We are
currently addressing opportunities and engaged in fulfilling orders targeted to
renewable energy markets in the United States (including Hawaii), Europe,
Australia, and Africa with the intention of introducing products and services
into these markets. The United States and governments throughout the world are
implementing renewable energy mandates, tax credits, matching investments, and
other incentives related to renewable energy and energy efficiency including the
energy storage sector.
In
conjunction with our strategic partners we are actively involved in submitting
proposals to the Federal and State Governments in response to Funding
Opportunity announcements issued as a result of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act. These proposals cover opportunities for plant expansion, Smart
Grid initiative, Renewable Energy Initiatives as well as research and
development opportunities for applications where the Company’s technology could
bring a change to market applications that we currently do not
address.
We
believe that some of the biggest challenges we face will be gaining market
acceptance for our newer products and reaching the renewable energy, utility and
other markets that we target. In order to be successful we must also develop a
reputation of reliability, quality service and continually drive down the total
cost of ownership of our products.
Technology
ZESS 50
Flow Battery
The ZBB
Zinc Energy Storage System (ZESS) is a proprietary and patented flow cell
battery based on zinc/bromide technology, which is very different in concept and
design from more traditional methods of energy storage such as the lead/acid
battery. The ZESS technology is based on the reaction between the two chemicals,
zinc and bromide. ZESS is a trade mark protected name owned by ZBB Energy
Corporation.
Unlike
the lead acid and most other batteries, the ZESS uses electrodes that do not
take part in the reactions but merely serve as substrates for the reactions.
There is a minimal loss of performance, unlike most rechargeable batteries, from
repeated cycling causing electrode material deterioration. During the charge
cycle metallic zinc is plated from the electrolyte solution onto the negative
electrode surfaces in the cell stacks. Bromide is then converted to Bromine at
the positive electrode surface of the cell stack and is immediately stored as a
safe chemically complexed organic phase in the electrolyte tank. When the ZESS
discharges, the metallic zinc plated on the negative electrode dissolves in the
electrolyte and is available to be plated again at the next charge cycle. In the
fully discharged state the ZESS can be left indefinitely.
The ZESS
offers two to three times the energy density (75 to 85 watt-hours per kilogram)
and weight savings over present lead/acid batteries. The power characteristics
of the ZESS can be modified, for selected applications. Therefore, the ZESS has
operational capabilities which make it extremely useful as a multi-purpose
energy storage option.
Powr
PECC
ZBB’s
Power and Energy Control Center Technology (“PECC”) provides the ability to
independently optimize the control of each generating source (or to provide the
ability to increase energy production of renewable power sources by providing
optimization of multiple sub-sets of the renewable sources) while having the
ability to provide any combination (type, size and quantities) of controlled
output (AC grid connected, AC off grid, or combination thereof for backup power,
a variety of DC outputs or any combination of AC and DC outputs) all in a single
factory tested package. These modules also have the ability to produce multiple
output voltages, and can provide from 25 kW to 100 kW with ZESS 50 units and 125
kW to 2 MW of power coupled with multiple ZESS 50 units.
With
advancements in the ZESS energy storage products and the incorporation of the
ZESS POWR PECC, ZBB is now positioned to provide solutions to system integrators
that will eliminate the segmented approach currently experienced today. The POWR
PECC also provides a more economical integration that uses the complete value of
ZESS energy storage and consequently gains efficiencies in storing renewable
energy sources for time of use applications, providing a controlled renewable
energy power plant. The ZESS product portfolio remains focused on the control of
electrical power and energy with its core ZESS energy storage technology at the
heart of the system and complimented with the new power conversion solutions.
ZBB’s product line is ideally suited for a number of utility markets, remote
area power and renewable energy applications. ZBB also plans to sell the PECC
product line independent of the ZESS 50.
Product
Design
The ZESS
technology is composed of a module or a series of modules for increased power.
The ZESS 50 stores 50 kWh of electrical energy and the module contains three
stacks each containing 60 cells. The module dimensions are 4’ x 4’ x 6.5’,
weighing 3,200 pounds. The ZESS 50 is well suited for large residential
applications, commercial application with and without renewable energy sources.
The ZESS 50 has rapid charging capabilities and fully charges from 0% State of
Charge to 100% in approximately four hours. ZESS 50 modules can be connected in
parallel or series to scale up to storage capacities of 500kWh’s.
The ZESS
50 provides “Turnkey” capabilities at a product level based on the ease of
transporting, site locating and connecting the systems into the grid or other
alternative energy generating sources. Along with ZBB’s most recent addition to
the product portfolio, the ZESS POWR PECC, ZBB now provides the unique ability
to automatically optimize the energy from the generating source manages the
power and energy in the system and provides the customer required output whether
that is to the electric grid, or off grid.
Our
systems provide a fully integrated energy storage solution for direct connect
and integration of multiple units of ZESS and or multiple types and quantities
of energy generating sources including all renewable and conventional sources;
while providing the customer with a single point of connection and thus
eliminating system integration complexity and issues arising from variable
devices and coordinating/integrating such devices in an efficient and optimal
way.
The
battery stacks are predominantly manufactured with recyclable plastics, allowing
for low production costs and economical mass production while being
environmentally friendly both in the manufacturing process as well as throughout
the products lifecycle.
Competing
Technologies
Lead-acid — Lead-acid is one
of the oldest and most developed battery technologies. It is a low initial cost
and popular choice for energy storage, but its suitability for energy management
is very limited in applications that require deep discharge, long cycle life and
longer term energy storage. Furthermore, the base components (lead and sulfuric
acid) used in this type of battery are neither desirable to handle and recycle
or to have installed in a facility without more extensive infrastructure and
precautions.
Compared
to lead-acid battery technology, we believe the zinc-bromine flow battery
provides longer life-cycle, performance at a lower overall cost while utilizing
materials that are more environmentally friendly. In addition, lead acid life
time and performance is very sensitive to ambient temperature.
We
believe that our product has certain superior functionality characteristics over
the leading lead acid technology of comparable 50kWh system,
including:
Vanadium Redox — A flow
battery that stores energy by use of vanadium dissolved in sulfuric acid
solutions. Larger system foot print, toxicity, higher installation effort,
custom designed construction project.
Sodium Sulfur (NaS) — A
battery consisting of molten liquid sulfur at the positive electrode and molten
metallic sodium at the negative electrode, separated by a solid beta alumina
ceramic electrolyte. The battery for this device must always be maintained at
high temperatures of approximately 300° C to allow the process to occur. This
solution consists of significant installation effort and is typically of much
larger or centralized type of energy storage as opposed to a distributed
approach.
Sodium Nickel (NaNi) — A
twenty year old technology that offers broad temperature range and high energy
density but has a cost estimated 4 x lead acid pricing.
Polysulfide Bromide (PSB) — A
flow battery system based on a regenerative fuel cell technology that provides a
reversible electrochemical reaction between two salt solution electrolytes
(sodium bromide and sodium polysulfide).
Metal-Air — Potential high
energy density and low cost battery, but electrical recharging is very difficult
and is still in development.
Lithium Ion — Also known as
Li-ion, these batteries offer high energy density and high efficiency. Li-ion is
widely used in small portable markets, but high manufacturing cost presently
prohibits large scale industrial applications.
Flywheels — These primarily
consist of a massive rotating cylinder operating in a low vacuum environment to
improve efficiency. The main use for flywheels is for short-term uninterruptible
power supply (UPS) and aerospace applications. Large scale applications would
require a flywheel “farm” approach.
Pumped Hydro Storage — Pumped
hydro storage is not a battery device, but rather, uses two reservoirs to create
a limited amount of energy on demand. During off peak hours water is pumped from
the lower reservoir to the upper; the water flow is reversed to generate
electricity. This method is widely used but characterized by long construction
times and high capital expenditure and requires a large geographic area and
water supply.
CAES — A peaking gas turbine
power plant using compressed air stored in large underground caverns inside salt
rocks.
Super Capacitor Storage —
These are devices with high power density and primarily designed for shorter
duration higher power ratio of operation. Current focus is on small scale
applications. Large scale applications are still under development.
Recent
Developments
Manufacturing
operations were suspended for most of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 for
retooling of the stack manufacturing process related to our Version 2 module
(V2). V2 encompasses improvement in efficiencies and stack life and which began
manufacturing during the quarter ending September 30, 2010
We are
currently in the process of developing of our next generation module, the
version three (V3), which has substantial changes in design, function and
significant cost of ownership reduction. To date, this project is very close to
its original timeline and has generated substantial intellectual property
(IP).
In
addition we are currently addressing numerous opportunities in the renewable
energy markets within the United States along with a diverse international
marketplace with the intention of introducing products and services into these
markets.
Our AEST
project with CSIRO, an agency of the Australian Federal Government, continued
throughout fiscal 2010, as planned. At the core of this project is the
development of the next generation of our ZESS 50kWh module. As a development
project the work program is therefore set as a series of milestones that measure
and report upon the progress toward a successful outcome. This project has
achieved and reported every milestone on time and on budget. The system modules
have now been manufactured and assembled and this system shipped to the site in
late September 2009 and was commissioned the following month. The project was
underway through the end of June 2010, and will be completed with the submission
of the final project report by the Company in September 2010.
As
mentioned above, we extended our IP portfolio during fiscal 2010 with a new
patent application filed for the ZESS POWR PECC system and filed internationally
through the PTC. The Company is active in reviewing its IP portfolio together
with other key engineering designs to ensure we protect and expand our
intellectual position and to maintain this valuable technology as a cornerstone
of our enterprise valuation.
The
Company continues to develop its proprietary ZESS POWR Hybrid power electronics
product for integrating ZESS energy storage technology directly with all sizes,
types and numbers of renewable energy sources in a single product. This product
performs the renewable energy functions that traditional inverters have done
over the past while integrating with energy storage in an optimal way with a
single “power plant” output for use on the electric utility grid or as an off
grid power plant. With this, integrators, Independent Power Producers (IPP’s),
commercial customers and electric utilities can leverage all the existing ZESS
system benefits of peak demand shifting with the addition of providing a
controlled and regulated renewable energy power plant. After these confirming
technology efforts with our proven power electronics partners and product
research in the market, the Company filed for patent in January of 2009. The
combined flexibility and modularity of the ZESS energy storage combined with the
flexibility and modularity of the ZESS POWR Power and Energy Control Center
(PECC) has provide the Company and its customers with a “game changing solution”
as stated by multiple system integrators and by its power electronic
partners.
Marketing
and Sales
We
continue to establish our sales and marketing staff with the recent addition of
a VP of Business Development and Marketing. As such, several strategic
relationships have been established with additional strategic relationships in
the process of being established in the different market sectors in the form of
key system integrator relationships, distributors, sales representative
organizations and OEM arrangements. We are and have been focusing our sales
efforts on the Energy storage integration with Renewable Energy for Electric
utilities, system integrators and IPP’s, commercial and industrial customers.
Additionally, we continue our focus in developing the Remote Area Power Systems
and commercial customers. ZBB has introduced a fully integrated ZESS offering
that provides customers with additional value to utilize a modular format for
energy storage applications and/or when integrating different renewable energy
resources. We do not believe that all distribution networks are appropriate for
the sale of our products to utility or renewable energy companies and we
therefore deal directly or through key distributors with our
customers.
The
technical characteristics of the ZESS system make it a strong candidate for a
wide range of energy markets. Some markets are more established and defined than
others, while some are still developing. Our strategy in reaching these markets
is based on exceeding performance and cost thresholds of competing technologies
and solutions. We plan to continue pursuing appropriate distribution and sales
arrangements with suitably qualified channel partners with established
operations capable of selling, installing and maintaining our products. At
present, ZBB has established relationship in geographical areas in the
northwest, the southwest, the northeast and Hawaii as well as an extension of
key channels through our relationship with Eaton Corporation.
We have
commercialized our systems for smaller Remote Area Power Systems and have
established distributor relationships in developing areas. We believe these
relationships will prove to be beneficial to ZBB, utilizing ZBB’s ZESS energy
storage products as well as its patent pending ZESS POWR PECC. Commercial and
home owner use, we may be required to utilize services of distributors that sell
to regional and national chain stores and home energy product re-sellers. We do
not currently have any distribution relationships for our products in this
market; however these are presently being developed.
We have
completed the process to achieve ISO 9000 certification for our Wisconsin plant
and operations and are now certified as ISO 9000-2008. We have also completed
the process of UL certification for our ZESS controls and in process of
achieving the UL certification in the power electronics portion of the ZESS
products via our power electronic supplier. We intend to pursue the power
conversion market and continue to assess the demand for our products in this
market; however there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve this
strategic objective. To address the lower power/energy applications such as
residential and some remote power systems applications such as
telecommunications (“TELCO”), we are in the process of evaluating an optimal
product configuration that will address these markets in the
future.
Our
long-term strategic goal is to expand our customer base, enabling us to
ultimately produce and sell energy storage systems to residential and commercial
customers who want to possess an alternative energy system for their businesses
or homes. Alternative energy applications have driven the marketplace for energy
storage solutions to manage the power and energy being produced for either on or
off grid applications.
The
multi-faceted value of the ZESS product portfolio and system solutions for
renewable energy, utility grid demand management, commercial and off grid remote
power systems, backup power systems as well as Smart Grid applications have been
demonstrated by the increase in customer RFQs.
Intellectual
Property
A
description of the current patented technologies, processed number of patents
and patent applications, along with the jurisdiction of patent application/grant
is as follows:
While we
have not patented our flow channel technology, management believes that the
technology is sufficiently difficult to develop and would require years of
research to replicate. So far, we have not seen any competitor be successful in
implementing the technologies necessary for manufacturing zinc bromide systems.
If a competitor is able to discover our processes and manufacture this product
on a commercial level, we may be materially and adversely affected. Therefore,
management revisits its patent application process from time to time and may in
the future file one or more patents relating to our flow channel technology as
well as other technologies that we develop if it determines that the risks of
disclosure are outweighed by the risks of non-protection of the patent in
question.
ZBB has
recently filed for patent (patent pending) “Method and apparatus for controlling
a hybrid power system” for its unique modular, flexible and standardized power
electronics topology known as the ZESS POWR Power and Energy Control Center
(PECC) for providing a single product integration of any combination of ZESS
products, renewable energy sources and/or conventional generating sources; while
providing a single or multiple outputs for a customers use, whether that be a
grid connect system, and off grid system or a DC distribution system at any
voltage level or a combination of all of the above.
Advanced
Engineering and Development
The
primary advanced engineering initiatives that the company is engaged in are the
development of our Version Three (V3) ZESS flow battery module and new versions
of the POWR PECC. The goal of these projects is to substantially reduce the cost
of manufacture and to increase the performance of the products. In addition, new
versions of the PECC are needed to cost effectively serve market segments like
telecom. Our advanced
engineering and development expense and cost of engineering and development
revenues totaled $4.1 million and $2.9 million in years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. We also had engineering and development revenues of $.6
million $1.1 million in years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Employees
We
currently have an aggregate of 31 full time employees, of which 26 are located
at our U.S. manufacturing and corporate headquarters in Wisconsin, and five
employed at our Research and Development facility in Australia. We expect
staffing numbers to significantly increase as our business grows and new
production equipment is deployed in accordance with our business expansion
plans.
Sources
and Availability of Raw Materials
We
believe that the chemicals used in the electrolyte that we acquire are readily
available and that the mixing of these substances in accordance with our
specifications can be outsourced to various blending facilities. Currently, we
outsource our electrolyte sorting and blending to a company in New Jersey,
however, other blending facilities are also available in the United States.
Similar, basic chemical raw materials are secured from Israel by the blending
company on our behalf, however, the ingredients that comprise our electrolyte
are not rare substances and we believe that other suppliers are
available.
To
improve manufacturing process efficiency, we outsource all basic manufacturing
processes, such as injection and rotational molding for elementary component
parts, and the mixing of our zinc bromide electrolyte solution, and devote our
production capacity to the proprietary “value added” manufacturing of the cell
stacks. We have patented designs and own all molds for all of the major parts of
our cell stacks and tanks. All companies to which we outsource our manufacturing
work are subject to confidentiality agreements.
We have
developed unique, and in several cases, proprietary process technology and
equipment for manufacturing of our energy storage products, the principal
product components of which are electrodes, separators, flow frames and end
blocks. The core manufacturing undertaken by us is the construction of
hermetically sealed, leak proof cell stacks, which consist of nearly 100%
plastic materials. The equipment and general techniques used by our
manufacturers are generally well-known manufacturing techniques employed in
several fields, including the automotive industry, and we believe that
alternative sources of manufacturing are available.
Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any Current
Reports on Form 8-K that we may file or furnish to the SEC pursuant to Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as any amendments
to any of those reports are available free of charge on or through our website
as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with or furnish them to the
SEC electronically. Our website is located at www.zbbenergy.com. In addition,
you may receive a copy of any of our reports free of charge by contacting our
Investor Relations department at our corporate headquarters.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Item
1A.
The
following factors should be considered carefully in addition to the other
information in this Form 10-K. Except for the historical information contained
herein, the discussion contained in this Form 10-K contains “forward-looking
statements,” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section
21E of the Exchange Act, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in this Form 10-K.
Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include
those discussed below, as well as those discussed elsewhere
herein.
Risk
Factors
Our
stock price could be volatile and our trading volume may fluctuate
substantially.
The price
of our common stock has been and may in the future continue to be extremely
volatile, with the sale price fluctuating from a low of $0.20 to a high of $6.00
since June 18, 2007, the first day our stock was traded on the NYSE Amex
(formerly American Stock Exchange). Many factors could have a significant impact
on the future price of our common stock, including:
|
·
|
our
inability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, whether
through the issuance of equity securities or
debt;
|
|
·
|
our
failure to successfully advance the development of our programs or
otherwise implement our business
objectives;
|
|
·
|
issuance
of new or changed securities analysts’ reports or
recommendations;
|
|
·
|
significant
acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint
ventures or capital committees by or involving us or our
competitors;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to consummate a strategic transaction to ensure the continued
funding of our operations, including corporate collaborations, merger and
acquisition activities and
consolidations;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to successfully integrate our acquisitions and realize anticipated
benefits from acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
changes
or contemplated changes in U.S. and foreign governmental
regulations;
|
|
·
|
competitors’
publicity regarding actual or potential products under
development;
|
|
·
|
competitors
announcing technological innovations or new commercial
products;
|
|
·
|
changes
in our intellectual property portfolio or developments or disputes
concerning proprietary rights, including patent
litigation;
|
|
·
|
actual
or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating
results;
|
|
·
|
changes
in accounting policies or
practices;
|
|
·
|
news
reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in our
industry;
|
|
·
|
general
domestic and international economic conditions and other external
factors;
|
|
·
|
general
market conditions; and
|
|
·
|
the
degree of trading liquidity in our common
stock.
|
In
addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market
price of securities issued by many companies which may be unrelated to the
operating performance of those particular companies. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect our share price, notwithstanding our operating
results.
For the
three-month period ended June 30, 2010, the daily trading volume for shares of
our common stock ranged from 15,600 to 1,774,200 shares traded per day, and the
average daily trading volume during such three-month period was 189,103 shares
traded per day. Accordingly, our investors who wish to dispose of their shares
of common stock on any given trading day may not be able to do so or may be able
to dispose of only a portion of their shares of common stock.
We
have incurred losses and anticipate incurring continuing losses.
For the
year ended June 30, 2010, the Company had revenues of $1,545,980. During this
period, the Company had a net loss of $9,606,826. For the year ended June 30,
2009, the Company had revenues of $1,156,792. During this period, the Company
had a net loss of $5,561,056. There can be no assurance that the Company will
have income from operations or net income in the future. As of June 30, 2010 we
had an accumulated deficit of $46.9 million. We anticipate that we will continue
to incur losses until we can produce and sell a sufficient number of our systems
to be profitable. However, we cannot predict when we will operate profitably, if
ever. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or
increase our profitability in the future.
We
will need additional financing.
We will
need additional financing to maintain and expand our business, and such
financing may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. In the event that
we issue any additional equity securities, investors’ interests in the company
will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per
share depending on the price at which such securities are sold. If we issue any
such additional equity securities, such issuances also will cause a reduction in
the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. Further,
any such issuance may result in a change in control.
When we
need additional financing, we cannot provide assurance that it will be available
on favorable terms, if at all. If we need funds and cannot raise them on
acceptable terms, we may not be able to:
|
·
|
execute
our growth plan;
|
|
·
|
take
advantage of future opportunities, including synergistic
acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
respond
to customers and competition; or
|
We are
not restricted from issuing additional common stock, including any securities
that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to
receive, common stock. The issuance of any additional shares of common stock or
securities convertible into, exchangeable for or that represent the right to
receive common stock or the exercise of such securities could be substantially
dilutive to shareholders of our common stock. The market price of our common
stock could decline as a result of sales of shares of our common stock made
after this offering or the perception that such sales could occur. Because our
decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market
conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate
the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our shareholders
bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common
stock and diluting their interests in us.
We may
issue debt and/or senior equity securities in the future, including the
debentures and/or shares of Series A preferred stock issuable under our Amended
and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd which would be
senior to our common stock upon liquidation. Upon liquidation, holders of our
debt securities, senior equity securities and lenders with respect to other
borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the
holders of our common stock.
If
we fail to adequately manage our resources, it could have a severe negative
impact on our financial results or stock price.
We could
be subject to fluctuations in technology spending by existing and potential
customers. Accordingly, we will have to actively manage expenses in a rapidly
changing economic environment. This could require reducing costs during economic
downturns and selectively growing in periods of economic expansion. If we do not
properly manage our resources in response to these conditions, our results of
operations could be negatively impacted.
We
may be unsuccessful in our efforts to obtain federal government grants which
could harm our business and results of operations. We also may be unsuccessful
in our efforts to monetize government tax credits and other off balance sheet
assets.
We may
seek to obtain government grants and subsidies in the future to offset all or a
portion of the costs of maintaining and expanding our business. We cannot be
certain that we will be able to secure any such government grants or subsidies.
Any grants that we may obtain could be terminated, modified or recovered by the
granting governmental body under certain conditions. We also have $33 million of
net operating loss carryforwards and $14.675 million of Department of Energy
sponsored tax credits. We are exploring ways to monetize or to use these off
balance sheet assets. However, there can be no assurance that these efforts will
prove successful.
Our
success depends on our ability to retain our managerial personnel and to attract
additional personnel.
Our
success depends largely on our ability to attract and retain managerial
personnel. Competition for desirable personnel is intense, and there can be no
assurance that we will be able to attract and retain the necessary staff. We
currently have 31 full-time employees. The loss of members of managerial staff
could have a material adverse effect on our future operations and on successful
development of products for our target markets. The failure to maintain
management and to attract additional key personnel could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Businesses
and consumers might not adopt alternative energy solutions as a means for
obtaining their electricity and power needs, and therefore our revenues may not
increase, and we may be unable to achieve and then sustain
profitability.
On-site
distributed power generation solutions, such as fuel cell, photovoltaic and wind
turbine systems, which utilize our energy storage systems, provide an
alternative means for obtaining electricity and are relatively new methods of
obtaining electrical power that businesses may not adopt at levels sufficient to
grow this part of our business. Traditional electricity distribution is based on
the regulated industry model whereby businesses and consumers obtain their
electricity from a government regulated utility. For alternative methods of
distributed power to succeed, businesses and consumers must adopt new purchasing
practices and must be willing to rely upon less traditional means of purchasing
electricity. We cannot assure you that businesses and consumers will choose to
utilize on-site distributed power at levels sufficient to sustain our business
in this area. The development of a mass market for our products may be impacted
by many factors which are out of our control, including:
|
·
|
market
acceptance of fuel cell, photovoltaic and wind turbine systems that
incorporate our products;
|
|
·
|
the
cost competitiveness of these
systems;
|
|
·
|
regulatory
requirements; and
|
|
·
|
the
emergence of newer, more competitive technologies and
products.
|
If a mass
market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, we may be
unable to recover the losses we will have incurred to develop these
products.
Our
industry is highly competitive and we may be unable to successfully
compete.
We
compete in the market for renewable energy products and services which is
intensely competitive. Evolving industry standards, rapid price changes and
product obsolescence also impact the market. Our competitors include many
domestic and foreign companies, most of which have substantially greater
financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do. Our current
competitors or new market entrants could introduce new or enhanced technologies,
products or services with features that render our technologies, products or
services obsolete or less marketable. Our success will be dependent upon our
ability to develop products that are superior to existing products and products
introduced in the future, and which are cost effective. In addition, we may be
required to continually enhance any products that are developed as well as
introduce new products that keep pace with technological change and address the
increasingly sophisticated needs of the marketplace. Even if our technology
currently proves to be commercially feasible, there is extensive research and
development being conducted on alternative energy sources that may render our
technologies and protocols obsolete or otherwise non-competitive.
Technological
developments in any of a large number of competing processes and technologies
could make our technology obsolete and we have little ability to manage that
risk. There can be no assurance that we will be able to keep pace with the
technological demands of the marketplace or successfully develop products that
will succeed in the marketplace. As a small company, we will be at a competitive
disadvantage to most of our competitors, which include larger, established
companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing,
marketing, distribution and other resources than us.
There can
be no assurance that new products or technologies, presently unknown to
management, will not, at any time in the future and without warning, render our
technology less competitive or even obsolete. Technology advances claimed by
current or new competitors may ultimately prove to make our products obsolete.
Major companies, academic and research institutions, or others, for example,
could develop new products which could potentially render our products obsolete.
Moreover, our technology could be susceptible to being analyzed and
reconstructed by an existing or potential competitor. Although the Company may
be the license holder of certain United States patents respecting its products,
we may not have the financial resources to successfully defend such patents,
were it to become necessary, by bringing patent infringement suits against
parties that have substantially greater resources than those available to
us.
In
addition, competitors may develop technology and products that can be sold and
installed at a lower per unit cost. There can be no assurance that we will have
the capital resources available to undertake the research which may be necessary
to upgrade our equipment or develop new devices to meet the efficiencies of
changing technologies. Our inability to adapt to technological change could have
a materially adverse effect on our results of operations.
Unless
we keep pace with changing technologies, we could lose existing customers and
fail to win new customers.
Our
future success will depend upon our ability to develop and introduce a variety
of new products and services and enhancements to these new products and services
in order to address the changing needs of the marketplace. We may not be able to
accurately predict which technologies customers will support. If we do not
introduce new products, services and enhancements in a timely manner, if we fail
to choose correctly among technical alternatives or if we fail to offer
innovative products and services at competitive prices, customers may forego
purchases of our products and services and purchase those of our
competitors.
If
our products do not perform as promised, we could experience increased costs,
lower margins and harm to our reputation.
The
failure of our products to perform as promised could result in increased costs,
lower margins and harm to our reputation. This could result in contract
terminations and have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
results.
Our
relationships with our strategic partners may not be successful and we may not
be successful in establishing additional partnerships, which could adversely
affect our ability to commercialize our products and services.
An
important element of our business strategy is to enter into strategic
partnerships with partners who can assist us in achieving our business goals. If
we are unable to reach agreements with suitable strategic partners, we may fail
to meet our business objectives for the commercialization of our products. We
may face significant competition in seeking appropriate alliance partners.
Moreover, these development agreements and strategic alliances are complex to
negotiate and time consuming to document. We may not be successful in our
efforts to establish additional strategic partnerships or other alternative
arrangements. The terms of any additional strategic partnerships or other
arrangements that we establish may not be favorable to us. In addition, these
partnerships may not be successful, and we may be unable to sell and market our
products to these companies and their affiliates and customers in the future, or
growth opportunities may not materialize, any of which could adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Shortages
or delay of supplies of component parts may adversely affect our operating
results until alternate sources can be developed.
Our
operations are dependent on the ability of suppliers to deliver quality
components, devices and subassemblies in time to meet critical manufacturing and
distribution schedules. If we experience any constrained supply of any such
component parts, such constraints, if persistent, may adversely affect operating
results until alternate sourcing can be developed. There may be an increased
risk of supplier constraints in periods where we are increasing production
volume to meet customer demands. Volatility in the prices of these component
parts, an inability to secure enough components at reasonable prices to build
new products in a timely manner in the quantities and configurations demanded
or, conversely, a temporary oversupply of these parts, could adversely affect
our future operating results.
We
have no experience manufacturing our products on a large-scale basis and may be
unable to do so at our current facility.
To date,
we have achieved only very limited production of our energy storage systems and
have no experience manufacturing our products on a large-scale basis. In
February 2006 we acquired a building we were previously leasing in Menomonee
Falls, Wisconsin which provides up to 72,000 square feet for use as a
manufacturing facility. This facility is currently producing at less than 10% of
its expected capacity. However, we do not know whether our current manufacturing
facility, even if operating at full capacity, will be adequate to enable us to
produce the energy storage systems in sufficient quantities to meet hoped for
future orders. If there is demand for our products, our inability to manufacture
a sufficient number of units on a timely basis would have a material adverse
effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations.
We
market and sell, and plan to market and sell, our products in numerous
international markets. If we are unable to manage our international operations
effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could
be adversely affected.
We market
and sell, and plan to market and sell, our products in a number of foreign
countries, including Australia, South Africa, Canada, European Union countries,
the United Kingdom, Italy, Chile, Brazil, India, Mexico as well as Puerto Rico,
various Caribbean island nations and various southeast Asia countries, and we
are therefore subject to risks associated with having international operations.
Risks inherent in international operations include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
·
|
changes
in general economic and political conditions in the countries in which we
operate;
|
|
·
|
unexpected
adverse changes in foreign laws or regulatory requirements, including
those with respect to renewable energy, environmental protection,
permitting, export duties and
quotas;
|
|
·
|
trade
barriers such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other
restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of our products
and make us less competitive in some
countries;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in exchange rates may affect demand for our products and may adversely
affect our profitability in US dollars to the extent the price of our
products and cost of raw materials and labor are denominated in a foreign
currency;
|
|
·
|
difficulty
with staffing and managing widespread
operations;
|
|
·
|
difficulty
of, and costs relating to compliance with, the different commercial and
legal requirements of the overseas markets in which we offer and sell our
products;
|
|
·
|
inability
to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights;
and
|
|
·
|
difficulty
in enforcing agreements in foreign legal
systems.
|
Our
business in foreign markets requires us to respond to rapid changes in market
conditions in these countries. Our overall success as a global business depends,
in part, on our ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory, economic,
social and political conditions. We may not be able to develop and implement
policies and strategies that will be effective in each location where we do
business, which in turn could adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Currency
translation and transaction risk may adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Our
reporting currency is the US dollar, and we conduct our business and incur costs
in the local currency of most countries in which we operate. As a result, we are
subject to currency translation risk. We expect a portion of our revenues to be
generated outside the United States and denominated in foreign currencies in the
future. Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the US dollar
could affect our revenues and cost of revenues, and could result in exchange
losses. We cannot accurately predict the impact of future exchange rate
fluctuations on our results of operations. Currently, we do not engage in any
exchange rate hedging activities and, as a result, any volatility in currency
exchange rates may have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
The
success of our business depends on our ability to develop and protect our
intellectual property rights, which could be expensive.
Our
success depends to a significant extent on our ability to obtain patent
protection on technologies and products and preserve trade secrets and to
operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. There can be no
assurance that any patent applications or patents we are able to license will
afford any competitive advantages or will not be challenged or circumvented by
third parties. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will not
independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology developed
by us. Because of the extensive time required for development, testing and
regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that before any of our
potential products can be commercialized, any related patent may expire, or
remain in existence for only a short period following commercialization, thus
reducing any advantage of the patent.
We also
rely on trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how to develop, maintain
and strengthen our competitive positions. While we take steps to protect our
proprietary rights to the extent possible, there can be no assurance that third
parties will not know, discover or develop independently equivalent proprietary
information or techniques, that they will not gain access to our trade secrets
or disclose our trade secrets to the public. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that
we can maintain and protect unpatented proprietary information and trade
secrets. Misappropriation of our intellectual property would have an adverse
effect on our competitive position and may cause us to incur substantial
litigation costs.
We
may be subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of
others, and unfavorable outcomes could harm our business.
Our
future operations may be subject to claims, and potential litigation, arising
from our alleged infringement of patents, trade secrets or copyrights owned by
other third parties. We intend to fully comply with the law in avoiding such
infringements. However, we may become subject to claims of infringement,
including such claims or litigation initiated by existing, better-funded
competitors. We could also become involved in disputes regarding the ownership
of intellectual property rights that relate to our technologies. These disputes
could arise out of collaboration relationships, strategic partnerships or other
relationships. Any such litigation could be expensive, take significant time,
and could divert management’s attention from other business concerns. Our
failure to prevail in any such legal proceedings, or even the mere occurrence of
such legal proceedings, could substantially affect our ability to meet our
expenses and continue operations.
If
our common stock is de-listed from the NYSE AMEX, the common stock will become
less liquid.
Our
shares have been listed on the NYSE Amex (formerly the American Stock Exchange)
since June 18, 2007. We are required to comply with all reporting and
listing requirements on a timely manner and maintain our corporate governance
and independent director standards. If the NYSE Amex delists our common stock
from trading if we fail to satisfy their ongoing listing requirements including,
without limitation, corporate governance, financial condition, and financial
reporting rules and minimum price and market capitalization rules, we will be
adversely affected and our stock will become less liquid. There can be no
assurance that our securities will remain eligible for trading on the NYSE Amex.
If our common stock is delisted, our stockholders would not be able to sell the
common stock on the NYSE Amex, and their ability to sell any of their common
stock would be severely if not completely limited.
We
have never paid cash dividends and do not intend to do so.
We have
never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently plan to
retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business rather than to pay
cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements, as well as
other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff
Comments
|
Not
Applicable.
Wisconsin
U.S.A. Property
In
February 2006 ZBB Energy Corporation acquired the property on which its
manufacturing facility is located at N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls,
Wisconsin. The Company has occupied a portion of this space since 2002 pursuant
to a sub-lease arrangement and acquired the property in February 2006 for
$2.2 million pursuant to a land purchase option with the owner. The
appraised fair market value of this property at the time of acquisition was
$2.4 million. In connection with the purchase of this property, the Company
initially incurred mortgage indebtedness from Investors Bank in Milwaukee in the
amount of $1.8 million and on May 14, 2008 entered into loan agreements to
convert the indebtedness into two long-term loans with Investors Bank and
Wisconsin Business Development Corporation which are guaranteed in part by the
US Small Business Administration.
The
property is approximately 3.4 acres and has a facility with approximately
72,000 square feet of rentable manufacturing space, of which the Company
occupied approximately 35,000 square feet at the time of its acquisition.
This property is used to house our U.S. production, assembly and
administration headquarters. The existing facility in Menomonee Falls is
suitable to accommodate manufacturing capacity to up to 32MWh
annually.
Bibra
Lake, Western Australia (Leasehold)
In 2001
our Australian subsidiary, moved into new, leased, self-contained research and
development facilities in Bibra Lake, Western Australia after previously
occupying sub-leased laboratory and workshop facilities. This facility also
provides the engineering support for Australian and South East Asia sales as
well as a marketing base for the Company in this region. The current rental is
$63,261 per annum (A$72,431), subject to annual CPI adjustments and which was
based on a rental valuation obtained in November 2006 by an independent
certified real estate appraisal company. In October of 2006, ZBB Technologies,
Ltd exercised its option to renew the lease for five years, expiring on
October 31, 2011.
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Not
applicable.
Item 4.
|
(Removed and
Reserved)
|
PART II
Item
5.
|
Market for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
The
Common Stock of the Company has traded on the NYSE Amex (formerly the American
Stock Exchange) under the name ZBB Energy Corporation (Symbol: ZBB) since June
20, 2007. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the range of
high and low reported sales price per share of our common stock as reported on
NYSE Amex.
|
|
High ($)
|
|
|
Low ($)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
As of
August 31, 2010, the Company had 888 shareholders of record. These shareholders
of record do not include non-registered stockholders whose shares are held in
“nominee” or “street name”.
We have
not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered
Securities
Not
applicable.
Item
6. Selected Financial
Data
Not
applicable.
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in this report includes forward-looking statements
based on our current management’s expectations. There can be no
assurance that actual results, outcomes or business conditions will not differ
materially from those projected or suggested in such forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including, the risks and uncertainties discussed
in the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results
of Operations – Year Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Year Ended June 30,
2009
Revenue
and Other income:
Our
revenues for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $1,545,980 and
$1,156,792, respectively, an increase of $389,188 or 33.6%. This was
the result of an increase in revenues of $899,460 from commercial product sales
and revenues, and a $510,272 decrease in engineering and development revenues as
compared to the year ending June 30, 2009. The increase in commercial
product sales and revenues was primarily the result of the Company’s sale of a
500 Kwh system shipped to Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland in the first
quarter of 2010. The decrease in engineering and development revenues
is due to the completion of the Advanced Electricity Storage Technologies
project (“AEST”) with the Commonwealth of Australia in June 2010. Due
to the completion of the AEST contract, we currently do not expect significant
engineering and development revenues in fiscal 2011. Revenues include
estimates of earned revenue based on the Company’s performance on its
engineering and development contracts.
Other
income for the year ended June 30, 2010 reflects a decrease in interest income
of $84,895 compared to the year ended June 30, 2009, due primarily to decreasing
investment balances and lower interest rates on invested funds.
Cost
and Expenses and Other Expense:
Total
costs and expenses for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $11,057,919
and $6,667,934, respectively. This increase of $4,389,985 in the year ended June
30, 2010 was primarily due to the following:
|
·
|
increased
costs of product sales primarily resulting from $572,891 related to
the shipment to the Dundalk Institute of
Technology;
|
|
·
|
decrease
in cost of engineering and development revenues of $215,504 due to a
decrease in activities required under the AEST
contract;
|
|
·
|
increases
in advanced engineering and development expenses primarily resulting from
$1,368,000 due to an increase in the Company’s engineering and development
activities for its next generation battery module and the PECC
systems;
|
|
·
|
severance
pay to the Company’s former CEO of
$390,000;
|
|
·
|
increase
in non-cash directors fees of $182,500 and an increase of $38,584 cash
based directors fees due to an increase in the size of the Board of
Directors and an increase in directors
fees;
|
|
·
|
increase
in stock option expense of $188,575 for options issued to new employees
and for accelerated vesting of directors
options;
|
|
·
|
legal
and accounting fees increases of $258,249 related to the termination of
the Company’s former CEO and restatements of the Company’s financial
statements; and
|
|
·
|
fund
raising expenses of $177,918 for government grant proposals, section 48c
tax credit fees, and loan commitment
fees.
|
The
increase in costs and expenses in the year ended June 30, 2010 also included
equipment impairment expenses of $903,305 and an increase in deprecation of
$146,401 over the prior year due to new equipment purchases in late fiscal year
2010.
Other
expenses for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted primarily of
interest expenses of $149,521 and $182,074, respectively. This decrease of
$32,553 in interest expense for the period ended June 30, 2010 was primarily due
to scheduled reductions in principal balances.
Net
Loss.
Our net
loss for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $9,606,826 and $5,561,056,
respectively, resulting in a $4,045,770 increase in net loss as compared to the
year ended June 30, 2009. This increase in loss was primarily the
result of increases in advanced engineering and development expenses, selling,
general and administrative expenses, and equipment impairment expenses, totaling
$3,616,270, as described above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our
inception, our research, advanced engineering and development, and operations
were primarily financed through debt and equity financings, and government
research contracts. Total paid in capital as of June 30, 2010 was
$49,909,006. We had a cumulative deficit of $46,894,677 as of
June 30, 2010 compared to a cumulative deficit of $37,287,851 as of June 30,
2009. At June 30, 2010 we had a working capital deficit of $800,204
compared to a June 30, 2009 working capital surplus of
$3,784,491. Our shareholders’ equity as of June 30, 2010 and June 30,
2009 was $1,451,277 and $6,765,835, respectively.
On May 1,
2009 we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC for a $10
million universal shelf, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 13,
2009. We took this action as a measure in anticipation of our
possible future needs to raise additional investment capital to fund additional
working capital and further capital expenditures. On August 18, 2009,
we used this universal shelf registration statement to complete a registered
direct sale of 1,791,667 units at $1.20 per unit consisting of an aggregate of
1,791,667 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 358,333 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.33 per share. The proceeds to
ZBB after deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses were
approximately $1.9 million. On March 9, 2010, we used this universal
shelf registration statement to complete a registered direct sale 2,243,750
units at $.80 per unit consisting of an aggregate of 2,243,750 shares of common
stock and warrants to purchase 1,121,875 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $1.04 per share. The proceeds to ZBB after deducting
placement agent fees and offering expenses were approximately $1.6
million.
On March
19, 2010, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with each of the
Company’s directors and certain of its officers in connection with the private
issuance and sale to such investors of 337,346 shares of common stock (the
“Private Placement”). Through the Private Placement the Company’s
directors and officers purchased a total of $280,000 shares of common stock for
a price per share equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on
March 19, 2010.
In
December 2009 we were awarded a $1.3 million Wisconsin Clean Energy Business
Loan through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. We closed
this loan transaction in May 2010 and we received $490,000 on the loan in July
2010, with $810,000 remaining to draw. During the quarter ended March
31, 2010 we received a $1.5 million financing commitment from our bank to
supplement the Wisconsin Clean Energy Business Loan. The financings
have various restrictions and requirements, including a $1.5 million
compensating cash balance requirement and expire September and October
2010.
In
connection with Mr. Parry’s retirement as director and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, we have accrued the entire remaining severance expense to be
paid to Mr. Parry. As of June 30, 2010, the amount of this accrual was
$225,000.
In
conjunction with our strategic partners we are actively involved in submitting
proposals to the Federal Government in response to Funding Opportunity
announcements issued as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
These proposals cover opportunities for plant expansion, Smart Grid initiative,
and renewable energy initiatives as well as research and development
opportunities for applications where the Company’s technology could bring a
transformational change to market applications that we currently do not
address. However, there can be no assurance we will receive any
government funding through these activities.
We also
have $38 million of net operating loss carryforwards and $14.675 million of
Department of Energy sponsored tax credits. The tax credits require the Company
to invest approximately $50 million in plant and equipment, which the Company
has not done. We are exploring ways to monetize or to use these
benefits. However, there can be no assurance that these efforts will
prove successful.
On August
30, 2010 we entered into an amended and restated securities purchase agreement
(“Socius Securities Purchase Agreement”) with Socius CG II, Ltd. (“Socius”).
Pursuant to the Socius Securities Purchase Agreement we have the right over a
term of two years, subject to certain conditions, to require Socius to purchase
up to $10 million of redeemable subordinated debentures and/or shares of
redeemable Series A preferred stock in one or more tranches. The
debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 10% and the shares of Series A
preferred stock accumulate dividends at the same rate. Both the
debentures and the shares of Series A preferred stock are redeemable at our
election at any time after the one year anniversary of
issuance. Neither the debentures nor the Series A preferred shares
are convertible into common stock. Shares of Series A preferred stock
are not yet authorized. Upon authorization, any outstanding
debentures will be automatically converted into shares of Series A preferred
stock. Under the Socius Securities Purchase Agreement, in connection with each
tranche Socius will be obligated to purchase that number of shares of our common
stock equal in value to 135% of the amount of the tranche at a per share price
equal to the closing bid price of the common stock on the trading day preceding
our delivery of the tranche notice (the “Investment Price”). Socius may pay for
the shares it purchases at its option, in cash or with a secured promissory
note. Our ability to submit a tranche notice is subject to certain conditions
including that: (1) a registration statement covering our sale of shares of
common stock to Socius in connection with the tranche is effective and (2) the
issuance of such shares would not result in Socius and its affiliates
beneficially owning more than 9.99% of our common stock. As of June
30, 2010 we had not submitted any tranche notices under the Socius Securities
Purchase Agreement. On September 2, 2010 we delivered the first
tranche notice under the Socius Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which
Socius will be required to purchase from us $517,168 of
debentures. The closing of the sale of debentures, which is subject
to satisfaction of customary closing conditions, is anticipated to occur on
September 20, 2010. In connection with the tranche, (1) Socius
purchased 1,163,629 shares of common stock for a total purchase price of
$698,177 and at a per share purchase price of $0.60 and (2) we issued to Socius
490,196 shares of common stock in payment of the commitment fee payable by us to
Socius in connection with the initial tranche under the securities purchase
agreement. Socius paid for the shares of common stock it purchased with a
secured promissory note maturing September 2, 2014
We
believe we currently possess sufficient capital to pursue our current operations
through the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. We expect to raise
additional debt and equity capital, including through use of the Securities
Purchase Agreement, to support our current business and growth
plan. Our investment capital requirements will depend upon numerous
factors, including our ability to control expenses, the progress of our
engineering and development programs, the success of our marketing and sales
efforts and our ability to obtain alternative funding sources such as government
grants. In order to actively manage financing risk, the board of
directors has worked with management to carefully consider financing
alternatives and to implement cost containment measures. Actions
taken by the board of directors and management in fiscal 2010 and continuing
into the current quarter include: 1) execute an overall reduction in
controllable expenses to preserve cash resources including revising our
non-employee director compensation policy so that fees are paid in equity
compensation instead of cash; 2) actively pursue additional sources of capital
to fund working capital and operating needs; 3) pursue government grant and
federal stimulus package opportunities; and 4) leverage the $1.3
million Wisconsin Clean Energy Business Loan that was awarded in December, 2009
through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
We
believe we have the necessary financing vehicles in place, including the Socius
Securities Purchase Agreement described above and the remainder of the $1.3
million dollar Wisconsin Clean Energy Business loan to fund the Company for the
next fiscal year. However, there can be no assurances that unforeseen
circumstances will not jeopardize the Company’s ability to draw on these
financing vehicles. Therefore, we are continuing to seek additional
sources of funds to add to the financing vehicles already in
place. However, we have no commitments to obtain any additional
funds, and there can be no assurance such funds will be available on acceptable
terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain such needed capital, our
financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely
affected and we may not be able to continue
operations.
Operating
Activities
For the
year ended June 30, 2010, net cash used in operations was
$5,849,539. Cash used in operations resulted from a net loss of
$9,606,826, reduced by $2,013,940 in non-cash adjustments and $1,743,347 in net
changes to working capital. Reductions in accounts receivable and inventories
resulting from deferral of inventory purchases provided net cash of $1,332,279
and an increase in accounts payable, accrued compensation and benefits, and
accrued expenses resulting from deferral of payment of these obligations
provided net cash of $1,199,994. Working capital decreased by
$802,747 due to a decrease in deferred revenue that resulted from the
recognition of revenue upon shipment of the related
products. Non-cash adjustments to operations included $527,439 of
stock based compensation expense, $424,297 of depreciation expense, and
impairment and other equipment charges of $903,305. The Company
also increased its inventory allowance by $158,899 which was a non-cash charge
to operations.
Investing
Activities
For the
year ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by investing activities was
$681,755, resulting $1,000,000 of cash provided by a decrease in bank
certificates of deposits with maturities greater than three months, offset by
$318,245 of cash used in purchase of property and equipment.
Financing
Activities
For the
year ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was
$3,426,103 resulting from $3,737,442 in net proceeds from the issuance of equity
securities, and $156,000 in additional financing on manufacturing equipment,
offset by repayments of $456,203 of principal on notes payable.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and related disclosures
require management to make estimates and assumptions.
We
believe that the following are our most critical accounting estimates and
assumptions the Company must make in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures:
Foreign
Currency
The
Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and reporting currency,
while the Australian dollar is the functional currency of one of its foreign
subsidiaries. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are
translated into United States dollars at exchange rates that are in effect as at
the balance sheet date while equity accounts are translated at historical
exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange
rates which were applicable during the reporting period. Translation adjustments
are accumulated in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) as a separate
component of Shareholders’ Equity in the consolidated balance sheet. No gain or
loss on translation is included in the net loss.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
revenues and expenses during the period covered by the report. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used in accounting for, amongst
other things, revenue recognition, inventory valuation, impairment and
realizability of assets, depreciation, and valuations of debt and equity
instruments. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and
the effects of any revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Income
Tax
The
Company records deferred taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting Standard
Codification (“ASC”) topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This ASC requires
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they
are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. There were no net
deferred tax assets recorded as of June 30, 2010.
The
Company has adopted ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). ASC Topic 740 clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in companies’
financial statements in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes. As a result, the Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC Topic 740 only allows the recognition
of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. As a result of
implementing ASC Topic 740, the Company’s management has reviewed the Company’s
tax positions and determined there were no outstanding, or retroactive tax
positions with less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by
the taxing authorities, therefore the implementation of this standard has not
had a material affect on the Company.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Land,
building, equipment, computers and furniture and fixtures are recorded at
cost. Maintenance, repairs and betterments are charged to
expense.
Finished
goods normally held for sale to customers may sometimes be used in demonstration
and testing by customers. During the periods that the units are
transferred from Inventory to Plant and Equipment they are depreciated over the
period in use. Since the intent is for these units to be eventually sold they
are returned to inventory upon the completion of customer demonstration and
testing at their written down value.
Depreciation
Depreciation
is provided for all plant and equipment on a straight line basis over estimated
useful lives of the assets. The depreciation rate used for each class
of depreciable asset is:
|
|
Depreciation Life
|
Manufacturing
Equipment
|
|
3 -
7 years
|
Office
Equipment
|
|
3 -
7 years
|
Building
and improvements
|
|
7 -
40 years
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with FASB ASC topic 360, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," the Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets
including property, plant and equipment when there is evidence that events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
If such
an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is compared to the
asset’s carrying value. Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over its
recoverable amount is expensed to the statement of operations. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present
value using a pre-tax discount rate.
Goodwill
Goodwill
is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized
but reviewed for impairment annually as of June 30 or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may be
impaired. These conditions could include a significant change in the
business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition,
or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting
unit.
Testing
for the impairment of goodwill involves a two step process. The first step of
the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting units fair value to
its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no
impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is
higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and
the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In
the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all
recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and
comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying
amount of that unit’s goodwill. Based on this method, the Company
determined fair value as evidenced by market capitalization, and concluded that
there was no need for an impairment charge.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash
deposits with a few high credit quality financial institutions predominately in
the United States. At times such balances may exceed federally
insurable limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such
accounts.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market and
consist of raw materials, work in progress and finished goods held for
resale.
Costs
incurred in bringing each product to its present location and conditions are
accounted for as follows:
·
|
Raw
materials – purchased cost of direct
material
|
·
|
Finished
goods and work-in-progress – purchased cost of direct material plus direct
labor plus a proportion of manufacturing
overheads.
|
The
Company evaluates the recoverability of its slow moving or obsolete inventories
at least quarterly. The Company estimates the recoverable cost of such inventory
by product type while considering factors such as its age, historic and current
demand trends, the physical condition of the inventory as well as assumptions
regarding future demand. The Company’s ability to recover its cost for slow
moving or obsolete inventory can be affected by such factors as general market
conditions, future customer demand and relationships with suppliers.
Historically, the Company’s inventories have demonstrated long shelf lives, are
not highly susceptible to obsolescence and are eligible for return under various
supplier return programs.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are recognized when persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exits,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to
buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The
portion of revenue related to installation and final acceptance, is deferred
until such installation and final customer acceptance are completed. The Company
charges shipping and handling fees when products are shipped or delivered to a
customer, and includes such amounts in net sales. The Company reports its sales
net of actual sales returns.
For sales
arrangements containing multiple elements (products or services), revenue
relating to undelivered elements is deferred at the estimated fair value until
delivery of the deferred elements. To be considered a separate element, the
product or service in question must represent a separate unit under Staff
Accounting Bulletin 104, and fulfill the following criteria: the delivered
item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and
reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and, if the
arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered
item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered
probable and substantially in our control. If the arrangement does not meet all
criteria above, the entire amount of the transaction is deferred until all
elements are delivered. Revenue from time and materials based service
arrangements is recognized as the service is performed.
Revenues
from government funded research and development contracts are recognized
proportionally as costs are incurred and compared to the estimated total
research and development costs for each contract. In many cases, the Company is
reimbursed only a portion of the costs incurred or to be incurred on the
contract. Government funded research and development contracts are generally
multi-year, cost-reimbursement and/or cost-share type contracts. The Company is
reimbursed for reasonable and allocable costs up to the reimbursement limits set
by the contract.
Advanced
Engineering and Development Expenses
The
Company expenses advanced engineering and development costs as incurred. These
costs consist primarily of labor, overhead, and materials to build prototype
units, materials for testing, develop manufacturing processes and include
consulting fees and other costs.
To the
extent these costs are separately identifiable, incurred and funded by advanced
engineering and development type agreements with outside parties; they will be
shown separately on the statement of operations as a “cost of engineering and
development contract”.
Warranty
and Contract Reserves
The
Company typically warrants its products for twelve months after installation or
eighteen months after date of shipment, whichever first occurs. Warranty
reserves are evaluated quarterly to determine a reasonable estimate for the
replacement of potentially defective materials of all energy storage systems
that have been shipped to customers.
While the
Company actively engages in monitoring and improving its evolving battery and
production technologies, there is only a limited product history and relatively
short time frame available to test and evaluate the rate of product
failure. Should actual product failure rates differ from the
Company’s estimates, revisions are made to the estimated rate of product
failures and resulting changes to the warranty reserve. In addition,
from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen
technical problems arise.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2009, battery stack manufacturing issues were
discovered as result of an internal test failure. As a result, the
Company has implemented several manufacturing process changes to eliminate the
potential for future failures and will adjust its warranty reserves
accordingly. We will adjust our warranty rates in future periods as
these processes are implemented and tested.
Management
also reviews the status of all active contracts to determine if there are any
conditions due to warranty, costs to complete, and other commitments to
completing the contract. If indications are an adverse net financial
outcome is likely, a provision is made for the total loss
anticipated.
Loss
per Share
The
Company follows the FASB ASC topic 260 “Earnings per Share” provisions which
require the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
(net loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. In accordance with the FASB ASC topic 260, any anti-dilutive
effects on net income (loss) per share are excluded (as of the years ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 there were 4,163,023 and 1,790,167 underlying options and
warrants that are excluded).
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company measures all “Share-Based Payments", including grants of stock options
and restricted shares, to be recognized in its consolidated statement of
operations based on their fair values on the grant date, consistent with FASB
ASC topic 718 “Stock Compensation” guidelines.
Accordingly,
the Company measures share-based compensation cost for all share-based awards at
the fair value on the grant date and recognition of share-based compensation
over the service period for awards that are expected to vest. The fair value of
stock options is determined based on the number of shares granted and the price
of our ordinary shares, and calculated based on the Black-Scholes valuation
model.
The
Company only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of operations for
those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest, using two
attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants with
only service-based vesting or the graded-vesting method, which considers each
performance period or tranche separately, for all other awards.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note
3 in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Known
Trends, Market Opportunities and Challenges
According
to a new market report by Pike Research, revenues from installed, stationary
energy storage systems are expected to grow from $1.5 billion in 2010 to $35.3
billion annually by 2020. Within this growth market, we are pursuing the
distributed segments that generally require storage capacity of 1 MW-hr or
lower. This is the market segment that can utilize multiple value drivers of
intelligent storage and can offer the shortest ROI for our
customers. It is also the best fit with our current product
strengths.
We
believe that in North America the electric utilities markets’ increasing energy
demands on an increasingly fragile transmission and distribution network is
forcing both utilities and commercial and industrial customers to adopt
distributed storage and delivery systems to increase the reliability and the
capacity of the electrical grid. We have designed our products to meet these
needs in that they can be combined for use in larger storage applications.
Federal and State Government initiatives to lessen the United States greenhouse
gas emissions and dependency on oil and increasing concerns surrounding CO2
emissions are also driving this market sector. We believe that solar and wind
energy has grown over the past five years and will continue to grow for so long
as fossil fuel prices are increasing. Because both solar and wind are
intermittent primary energy sources, both grid connected and off-grid
installations require energy storage devices to optimize their
capabilities.
We
continue to build a direct market pipeline of opportunities which include
several electric utilities; companies involved in renewable energy; large
renewable energy integrators involved in on-grid and off-grid applications,
government facilities and other commercial and industrial opportunities such as
“big box” store chains.
We have
advanced the ZBB presence and awareness in the market through involvement in
various market conferences (energy storage, wind, and solar, electric utility),
direct marketing, marketing materials and web content, as well as continued
efforts in media channels and highly visible applications. ZBB is in
the process of furthering these marketing and networking efforts with additional
marketing activities that will continue to raise the profile of ZBB and the ZESS
brands. In addition, ZBB is in active discussions with
established partners in the major global growth markets of China, India and
Southeast Asia. These partnership discussions range from joint
product development to channel synergies.
We are
currently addressing opportunities and engaged in fulfilling orders targeted to
renewable energy markets in the United States, Europe, Australia, and Africa
with the intention of introducing products and services into these
markets. The United States and governments throughout the world are
implementing renewable energy mandates, tax credits, investments, and other
incentives related to renewable energy and energy efficiency including the
energy storage sector.
As
announced on September 8, 2010, we will partner with SunPower Corp. (Nasdaq:
SPWRA, SPWRB) to establish a pilot program for demonstrating integration of
advanced energy storage systems with existing PV systems for commercial
customers. Working with a major retailer, SunPower and ZBB will demonstrate the
economic and operational benefits of combining PV with a ZBB zinc bromide flow
battery storage technology platform rated at 500 KWh in a commercial building
application.
We are in
the process of writing the final report on our project (Advanced Electricity
Storage Technologies project) with the Commonwealth of Australia which commenced
July 2007 and ran through July 2010. This project included payment to the
Company of approximately $2.4 million for development costs and included the
production and demonstration of one 500kWh energy storage system for
installation into a renewable energy site in Australia. In December 2008 we
received an order for a Zess 500 system to be installed in conjunction with
existing wind energy assets at the Dundalk Institute of Technology in the
Republic of Ireland, which was produced and shipped in July 2010.
During
fiscal 2009 we signed a contract with the Wisconsin Energy Independence Fund to
secure $229,000 in support grant funding for the research and development of our
own proprietary power conversion systems for both AC to DC and DC to DC
renewable energy applications. We have contracted with a Wisconsin based partner
to build and package the power electronics components for two units for
evaluation with two ZESS 50 systems contracted to be built under this grant.
This grant lead to the development of the PECC system which has become a major
driver for future growth opportunities for ZBB.
In
addition to the other risk factors stated above, and other information relating
to our business as referenced in the “Business” section, we believe that some of
the biggest challenges we face will be gaining market acceptance for our newer
products and reaching the renewable energy, utility and other markets that we
target. In order to be successful we must also develop a reputation of
reliability, quality service and continually drive down the total cost of
ownership of our products.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
Not
applicable.
Item
8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
28
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
29
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
|
30
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years ended June 30,
2010 and 2009
|
|
31
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
|
32
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
33
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
ZBB Energy Corporation
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ZBB Energy Corporation
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ZBB Energy Corporation
and subsidiaries at June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to incur significant
operating losses and has an accumulated deficit of $46,894,677 that raises substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The
Company is dependent on future debt and equity fundraising, additional sales
orders, increase in margins, strategic partnerships, and/or government programs
to sustain continued operations and meet past obligations. Management’s
plans regarding these matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/PKF LLP
New York, NY
September 7, 2010
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,235,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,970,009 |
|
Bank
certificate of deposit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
614,154 |
|
Interest
receivable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,746 |
|
Inventories-net of $304,200 and $145,301
allowance
|
|
|
702,536 |
|
|
|
1,587,113 |
|
Prepaids
and other current assets
|
|
|
149,098 |
|
|
|
143,173 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
2,094,822 |
|
|
|
6,334,195 |
|
Long-term
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,568,823 |
|
|
|
4,578,180 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
803,079 |
|
|
|
803,079 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
6,466,724 |
|
|
$ |
11,715,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
loans
|
|
|
395,849 |
|
|
|
416,558 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
869,179 |
|
|
|
827,001 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
539,100 |
|
|
|
25,765 |
|
Deferred
revenues
|
|
|
325,792 |
|
|
|
1,128,539 |
|
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
765,106 |
|
|
|
151,841 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
2,895,026 |
|
|
|
2,549,704 |
|
Long-term
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
loans
|
|
|
2,120,421 |
|
|
|
2,399,915 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
$ |
5,015,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,949,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock ($0.01 par value);
150,000,000 authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,915,389
and 10,618,297 shares issued
|
|
|
149,155 |
|
|
|
106,183 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
49,770,987 |
|
|
|
45,549,079 |
|
Treasury
stock - 13,833 shares
|
|
|
(11,136 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
(1,563,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,601,576 |
) |
Accumulated
(deficit)
|
|
|
(46,894,677 |
) |
|
|
(37,287,851 |
) |
Total
shareholders' equity
|
|
$ |
1,451,277 |
|
|
$ |
6,765,835 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$ |
6,466,724 |
|
|
$ |
11,715,454 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
967,455 |
|
|
$ |
67,995 |
|
Engineering
and development revenues
|
|
|
578,525 |
|
|
|
1,088,797 |
|
Total
Revenues
|
|
|
1,545,980 |
|
|
|
1,156,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of product sales
|
|
|
899,287 |
|
|
|
56,468 |
|
Cost
of engineering and development revenues
|
|
|
1,836,299 |
|
|
|
2,051,803 |
|
Advanced
engineering and development
|
|
|
2,239,139 |
|
|
|
807,291 |
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
4,755,592 |
|
|
|
3,474,476 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
424,297 |
|
|
|
277,896 |
|
Impairment
and other equipment charges
|
|
|
903,305 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
11,057,919 |
|
|
|
6,667,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(9,511,939 |
) |
|
|
(5,511,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
60,193 |
|
|
|
145,088 |
|
Interest
(expense)
|
|
|
(149,521 |
) |
|
|
(182,074 |
) |
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
(5,559 |
) |
|
|
(12,928 |
) |
Total
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
(94,887 |
) |
|
|
(49,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(9,606,826 |
) |
|
|
(5,561,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$ |
(9,606,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,561,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss per share-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.74 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares-basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,924,362 |
|
|
|
10,547,621 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,924,362 |
|
|
|
10,547,621 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ZBB
Energy Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Add'l Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Note
Receivable
from
Shareholders
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
TOTAL
Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
Comprehensive
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance:
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
10,512,283 |
|
|
$ |
105,123 |
|
|
$ |
45,619,608 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(608,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,373,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,726,795 |
) |
|
$ |
12,016,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options expensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,114 |
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of restricted stock in payment of compensation
|
|
|
101,014 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
72,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,177 |
|
|
|
|
Deferred
stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,167 |
) |
|
|
|
Amortization
of deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,490 |
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of restricted stock - in payment of consulting
fees
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,250 |
|
|
|
|
Reduction
of note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
608,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,561,056 |
) |
|
|
(5,561,056 |
) |
|
|
(5,561,056 |
) |
Net
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,091 |
) |
|
|
(228,091 |
) |
Balance:
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
10,618,297 |
|
|
$ |
106,183 |
|
|
$ |
45,549,079 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,601,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,287,851 |
) |
|
$ |
6,765,835 |
|
|
$ |
(5,789,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock net of costs underwriting
fees
|
|
|
4,035,417 |
|
|
|
40,355 |
|
|
|
3,661,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,701,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of deferred equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
of stock purchase agreement
|
|
|
(28,750 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retired
restricted stock
|
|
|
(46,921 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of restricted common stock offering
|
|
|
337,346 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
276,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,606,826 |
) |
|
|
(9,606,826 |
) |
|
|
(9,606,826 |
) |
Net
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,524 |
|
|
|
38,524 |
|
Balance:
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
14,915,389 |
|
|
$ |
149,155 |
|
|
$ |
49,770,987 |
|
|
$ |
(11,136 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1,563,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,894,677 |
) |
|
$ |
1,451,277 |
|
|
$ |
(9,568,302 |
) |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
ZBB Energy Corporation
|
|
Year ended June 30,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(9,606,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,561,056 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash (used) in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
424,297 |
|
|
|
277,896 |
|
Change
in inventory allowance
|
|
|
158,899 |
|
|
|
(88,699 |
) |
Equipment
costs reclassified to expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
372,855 |
|
Impairment
and other equipment charges
|
|
|
903,305 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payments
applied to note receivable for consulting fees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
527,439 |
|
|
|
338,864 |
|
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
606,601 |
|
|
|
(609,987 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
725,678 |
|
|
|
(185,530 |
) |
Prepaids
and other current assets
|
|
|
(5,925 |
) |
|
|
(41,799 |
) |
Other
receivables-interest
|
|
|
19,746 |
|
|
|
61,083 |
|
Increase
(decrease) in operating liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
42,178 |
|
|
|
247,500 |
|
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
613,265 |
|
|
|
22,092 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
544,551 |
|
|
|
25,765 |
|
Deferred
revenues
|
|
|
(802,747 |
) |
|
|
717,539 |
|
Net
cash (used) in operating activities
|
|
|
(5,849,539 |
) |
|
|
(4,223,477 |
) |
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(318,245 |
) |
|
|
(889,658 |
) |
Bank
certificate of deposit
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
Net
cash provided (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
681,755 |
|
|
|
(1,889,658 |
) |
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from bank loan
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
Repayments
of bank loans
|
|
|
(456,203 |
) |
|
|
(306,984 |
) |
Proceeds
from stock issuance - net of fees and costs
|
|
|
3,737,442 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
(11,136 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,426,103 |
|
|
|
763,016 |
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
(131,192 |
) |
Net
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,734,374 |
) |
|
|
(5,481,311 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of year
|
|
|
2,970,009 |
|
|
|
8,451,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents - end of year
|
|
$ |
1,235,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,970,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
111,927 |
|
|
$ |
121,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in joint venture offset by unfulfilled deferred revenue
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
Equipment
costs reclassified to expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
372,855 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
June
30, 2010
NOTE 1 —
NATURE OF ORGANIZATION
ZBB
Energy Corporation (“ZBB” or the “Company”) develops and manufactures
distributed energy storage solutions based upon the Company’s proprietary
zinc-bromine rechargeable electrical energy storage technology. The
Company was incorporated under the laws of Wisconsin in 1998.
The
Company develops, manufactures and markets energy storage systems with electric
utility applications as its initial market. This scalable, mobile system is
ideally suited for a number of market applications including:
|
·
|
Load
management for generation, transmission and distribution utilities, energy
service companies and large industrial customers allowing peak shaving and
deferral of capital expenditures that otherwise would be required to
alleviate utility system
constraints.
|
|
·
|
Storage
of renewable wind and solar energy production in both grid connected and
grid independent environments.
|
|
·
|
Power
quality to alleviate downtime caused by voltage sags, voltage swells,
frequency fluctuations, and combined with uninterruptible power supply
(UPS) to eliminate power outages.
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those
of its wholly owned subsidiaries, ZBB Technologies, Inc. which operates a
manufacturing facility in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, and ZBB Technologies, Ltd.
which has its advanced engineering and development facility in Perth,
Australia.
NOTE
2 – GOING CONCERN
The
consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2010 and for the year then
ended have been prepared on the basis of a going concern which contemplates that
ZBB Energy Corporation and subsidiaries will be able to realize assets and
discharge liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, they do not
give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be
required to liquidate its assets. The Company incurred a net loss of $9,606,826 for the
year ended June 30, 2010 and has an accumulated deficit of $46.9 million. The
ability of the Company to meet its total liabilities of $5,015,447 and to
continue as a going concern is dependent upon the availability of future funding
and achieving profitability. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties.
The
Company believes, with the financing vehicles now in place and with other
potential financing sources, that it will be able to raise the capital necessary
to fund operations through fiscal year 2011. The Company’s sources of
capital in the year ending June 30, 2011 include the raising of up to $10
million from Socius CG II, Ltd., as described in Note 13 and $1.3 million under
the Wisconsin Department of Commerce loan, as described in Note 10. However,
these facilities place certain restrictions on our ability to draw on
them. For example, our ability to submit a tranche notice under the
Socius Agreement is subject to certain conditions including that: (1) a
registration statement covering our sale of shares of common stock to Socius in
connection with the tranche is effective and (2) the issuance of such shares
would not result in Socius and its affiliates beneficially owning more than
9.99% of our common stock. These limitations have been carefully
considered by the Company and notwithstanding such limitations management
believes it will be able to successfully utilize them. However, there
can be no assurances that unforeseen circumstances will not jeopardize the
Company’s ability to draw on these financing vehicles.
Accordingly,
the Company is currently exploring various alternatives including debt and
equity financing vehicles, strategic partnerships, and/or government programs
that may be available to the Company, as well as trying to generate additional
sales and increase margins. However, the Company has no commitments
to obtain any additional funds, and there can be no assurance such funds will be
available on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to
obtain additional funding and improve its operations, the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the
Company may not be able to continue operations.
NOTE 3 —
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated upon consolidation.
Foreign
Currency
The
Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and reporting currency,
while the Australian dollar is the functional currency of one of its foreign
subsidiaries. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are
translated into United States dollars at exchange rates that are in effect as at
the balance sheet date while equity accounts are translated at historical
exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange
rates which were applicable during the reporting period. Translation adjustments
are accumulated in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) as a separate
component of Shareholders’ Equity in the consolidated balance sheet. No gain or
loss on translation is included in the net loss.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
revenues and expenses during the period covered by the report. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used in accounting for, amongst
other things, revenue recognition, inventory valuation, impairment and
realizability of assets, depreciation, and valuations of debt and equity
instruments. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and
the effects of any revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Income
Tax
The
Company records deferred taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting Standard
Codification (“ASC”) topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This ASC requires
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they
are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized. There were no net
deferred tax assets recorded as of June 30, 2010.
The
Company has adopted ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). ASC Topic 740 clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in companies’
financial statements in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes. As a result, the Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC Topic 740 only allows the recognition
of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. As a result of
implementing ASC Topic 740, the Company’s management has reviewed the Company’s
tax positions and determined there were no outstanding, or retroactive tax
positions with less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by
the taxing authorities, therefore the implementation of this standard has not
had a material affect on the Company.
Based on
its evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant
uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. The
Company’s evaluation was performed for the tax periods ended June 30, 2007
through June 30, 2010 for U.S. Federal Income Tax and for the tax periods ended
June 30, 2005 through June 30, 2010 for the State of Wisconsin Income Tax, the
tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of
June 30, 2010.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Land,
building, equipment, computers and furniture and fixtures are recorded at
cost. Maintenance, repairs and betterments are charged to
expense.
Finished
goods normally held for sale to customers may sometimes be used in demonstration
and testing by customers. During the periods that the units are
transferred from Inventory to Plant and Equipment they are depreciated over the
period in use. Since the intent is for these units to be eventually sold they
are returned to inventory upon the completion of customer demonstration and
testing at their written down value.
Depreciation
Depreciation
is provided for all plant and equipment on a straight line basis over estimated
useful lives of the assets. The depreciation rate used for each class
of depreciable asset is:
|
|
Depreciation Life
|
Manufacturing
Equipment
|
|
3 -
7 years
|
Office
Equipment
|
|
3 -
7 years
|
Building
and improvements
|
|
7 -
40 years
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with FASB ASC topic 360, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," the Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets
including property, plant and equipment when there is evidence that events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
If such
an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is compared to the
asset’s carrying value. Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over its
recoverable amount is expensed to the statement of operations. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present
value using a pre-tax discount rate.
Goodwill
Goodwill
is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized
but reviewed for impairment annually as of June 30 or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may be
impaired. These conditions could include a significant change in the
business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition,
or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting
unit.
Testing
for the impairment of goodwill involves a two step process. The first step of
the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting units fair value to
its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no
impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is
higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and
the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In
the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all
recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and
comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying
amount of that unit’s goodwill. Based on this method, the Company
determined fair value as evidenced by market capitalization, and concluded that
there was no need for an impairment charge.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash
deposits with a few high credit quality financial institutions predominately in
the United States. At times such balances may exceed federally
insurable limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such
accounts.
Investments
The
Company occasionally invests in bank certificates of deposits with maturities of
more than three months. As of June 30, 2009 the Company held a nine
month certificate of deposit, interest accruing at 3.96%, which matured on
September 30, 2009.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market and
consist of raw materials, work in progress and finished goods held for
resale.
Costs
incurred in bringing each product to its present location and conditions are
accounted for as follows:
·
|
Raw
materials – purchased cost of direct
material
|
·
|
Finished
goods and work-in-progress – purchased cost of direct material plus direct
labor plus a proportion of manufacturing
overheads.
|
The
Company evaluates the recoverability of its slow moving or obsolete inventories
at least quarterly. The Company estimates the recoverable cost of such inventory
by product type while considering factors such as its age, historic and current
demand trends, the physical condition of the inventory as well as assumptions
regarding future demand. The Company’s ability to recover its cost for slow
moving or obsolete inventory can be affected by such factors as general market
conditions, future customer demand and relationships with suppliers.
Historically, the Company’s inventories have demonstrated long shelf lives, are
not highly susceptible to obsolescence and are eligible for return under various
supplier return programs.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are recognized when persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exits,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to
buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The
portion of revenue related to installation and final acceptance, is deferred
until such installation and final customer acceptance are completed. The Company
charges shipping and handling fees when products are shipped or delivered to a
customer, and includes such amounts in net sales. The Company reports its sales
net of actual sales returns.
For sales
arrangements containing multiple elements (products or services), revenue
relating to undelivered elements is deferred at the estimated fair value until
delivery of the deferred elements. To be considered a separate element, the
product or service in question must represent a separate unit under SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin 104, and fulfill the following criteria: the delivered
item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and
reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and, if the
arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered
item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered
probable and substantially in our control. If the arrangement does not meet all
criteria above, the entire amount of the transaction is deferred until all
elements are delivered. Revenue from time and materials based service
arrangements is recognized as the service is performed.
Revenues
from government funded research and development contracts are recognized
proportionally as costs are incurred and compared to the estimated total
research and development costs for each contract. In many cases, the Company is
reimbursed only a portion of the costs incurred or to be incurred on the
contract. Government funded research and development contracts are generally
multi-year, cost-reimbursement and/or cost-share type contracts. The Company is
reimbursed for reasonable and allocable costs up to the reimbursement limits set
by the contract.
Total
revenues of $1,545,980 and $1,156,792 were recognized for the years ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were comprised of two significant customers
in 2010 (29% and 40% of total revenues) and one significant customer in 2009
(85% of total revenues).
Advanced
Engineering and Development Expenses
The
Company expenses advanced engineering and development costs as incurred. These
costs consist primarily of labor, overhead, and materials to build prototype
units, materials for testing, develop manufacturing processes and include
consulting fees and other costs.
To the
extent these costs are separately identifiable, incurred and funded by advanced
engineering and development type agreements with outside parties; they will be
shown separately on the statement of operations as a “cost of engineering and
development revenues”.
Engineering
and Development Revenues
On June
29, 2007, ZBB Technologies Ltd (“ZBB Technologies”), an Australian subsidiary of
ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”), and the Commonwealth of Australia (the
“Commonwealth”) represented by and acting through the Department of Environment
and Water Resources (the “Department”), entered into an agreement for project
funding under the Advanced Electricity Storage Technologies (“AEST”) program
(the “Agreement”) whereby the Department agreed to provide funding to ZBB
Technologies for the development of an energy storage system that will be used
to demonstrate the storage and supply of renewable energy generated from
photovoltaic solar panels and wind turbines already operational at the
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization’s (“CSIRO”)
Newcastle Energy Centre in New South Wales, Australia.
The
Agreement provides for a three year term under which the Commonwealth will
provide $2.6 million (A$3.1 million) in project funding over several periods,
totaling $1.35 million in year one, $1.01 million in year two and $0.24 million
in year three, as certain development progress “milestones” are met by ZBB
Technologies to the satisfaction of the Commonwealth.
The
Agreement is subject to early termination or a reduction in scope by the
Commonwealth at any time or in the event of a default by ZBB
Technologies. If the Commonwealth decides to terminate early or
reduce the scope of the Agreement, the Commonwealth will be liable to ZBB
Technologies for the amount of funds that have been legally committed by ZBB
Technologies in accordance with the Agreement. However, the
Commonwealth is entitled to recover any part of the funds which have not been
legally committed by ZBB Technologies. The Commonwealth will also be
liable for reasonable costs of termination or reduction in scope incurred by ZBB
Technologies attributable to such action.
ZBB
Technologies has agreed to indemnify the Commonwealth against any loss or
liability incurred by the Commonwealth, including loss or expenses incurred in
dealing with any claim against the Commonwealth arising from the use of
materials provided by ZBB Technologies under the Agreement and any breach of the
Agreement by ZBB Technologies. The extent of liability is reduced
proportionately by any fault of the Commonwealth.
The
Company owns any assets, including battery storage systems, acquired with the
funding from the contract. The Company grants the government of
Australia a free, non-exclusive license to intellectual property created in the
project for their own internal use.
The AEST
project has total budgeted expenditure for operating and capital items of
approximately $4.7 million (A$5.9 million) exclusive of any Australian taxes.
The Company’s contribution of approximately $2.3 million (A$2.8 million) is the
value of any cash and in-kind contributions provided to the project by the
Company in undertaking the project activities. The Australian Government is
providing the project funding of approximately $2.6 million (A$3.1 million) to
be paid in accordance with the completion of contracted project milestones and
subject to the Company’s compliance with project reporting requirements and
demonstrating that the funds already provided to it have been fully spent or
will be fully spent in the near future. The Company has fulfilled its
required contributions to the project in cash and in-kind contributions as of
June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has received
$2,414,677 in total payments from the Australian Government for milestones
achieved to date. The Company expects to receive the final payment of
approximately $150,000 from AEST during the quarter ending December 31,
2010.
Included
in Engineering and Development revenues and costs of Engineering and development
revenues were $453,514 and $1,561,061, respectively, for the year ended June 30,
2010, and $984,807 and $1,843,824 respectively for the year ended June 30, 2009,
related to the AEST contract. There are no additional costs for the
Company to incur subsequent to June 30, 2010. The financial
statements also include engineering and development revenue and costs from
another engineering and development contract.
At June
30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no unbilled amounts from engineering and
development contracts. The Company had customer payments from engineering and
development contract revenue, representing deposits in advance of performance of
the allowable work, in the amount of $0 and $333,817 as of June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. These amounts are included in deferred revenue on
the consolidated balance sheet.
Warranty
and Contract Reserves
The
Company typically warrants its products for twelve months after installation or
eighteen months after date of shipment, whichever first occurs. Warranty
reserves are evaluated quarterly to determine a reasonable estimate for the
replacement of potentially defective materials of all energy storage systems
that have been shipped to customers.
While the
Company actively engages in monitoring and improving its evolving battery and
production technologies, there is only a limited product history and relatively
short time frame available to test and evaluate the rate of product
failure. Should actual product failure rates differ from the
Company’s estimates, revisions are made to the estimated rate of product
failures and resulting changes to the warranty reserve. In addition,
from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen
technical problems arise.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2009, battery stack manufacturing issues were
discovered as result of an internal test failure. As a result, the
Company has implemented several manufacturing process changes to eliminate the
potential for future failures and will adjust its warranty reserves
accordingly. We will adjust our warranty rates in future periods as
these processes are implemented and tested.
Management
also reviews the status of all active contracts to determine if there are any
conditions due to warranty, costs to complete, and other commitments to
completing the contract. If indications are an adverse net financial
outcome is likely, a provision is made for the total loss
anticipated.
As of
June 30, 2010, included in the Company’s accrued expenses were approximately
$520,000 in warranty reserves.
Loss
per Share
The
Company follows the FASB ASC topic 260 “Earnings per Share” provisions which
require the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
(net loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. In accordance with the FASB ASC topic 260, any anti-dilutive
effects on net income (loss) per share are excluded (as of the years ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 there were 4,163,023 and 1,790,167 underlying options and
warrants that are excluded).
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company measures all “Share-Based Payments", including grants of stock options
and restricted shares, to be recognized in its consolidated statement of
operations based on their fair values on the grant date, consistent with FASB
ASC topic 718 “Stock Compensation” guidelines.
Accordingly,
the Company measures share-based compensation cost for all share-based awards at
the fair value on the grant date and recognition of share-based compensation
over the service period for awards that are expected to vest. The fair value of
stock options is determined based on the number of shares granted and the price
of our ordinary shares, and calculated based on the Black-Scholes valuation
model.
The
Company only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of operations for
those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest, using two
attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants with
only service-based vesting or the graded-vesting method, which considers each
performance period or tranche separately, for all other awards. See Note 10
below.
Comprehensive
income (loss)
The
Company reports its comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with the FASB
ASC topic 220
“Comprehensive Income”, which requires presentation of the components of
comprehensive earnings. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income
(loss) for the period plus or minus any net currency translation adjustments
applicable for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and is presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk and Fair Value:
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash and U.S. treasury investments, and bank
certificates of deposit, and accounts receivable.
The
Company maintains significant cash investments primarily with three or four
financial institutions, which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The
Company has not previously experienced any losses on such deposits.
Additionally, the Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit
rating of these institutions as part of its investment strategy.
Concentrations
of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to
accelerated payment terms in current customer contracts and creditworthiness of
the current customer base. However, at June 30, 2010, primarily all of the
Company’s receivables pertain to one customer and revenues were concentrated
among two customers during the year then ended. At June 30, 2009, primarily all
of the Company’s receivables pertain to one customer and revenues were
concentrated among two customers during for the year then ended.
The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade
receivables, other current assets and accounts payable approximate fair value
due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of bank
loans and notes payable approximate fair value based on their terms which
reflect market conditions existing as of June 30, 2010.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s amounts to conform to the
presentation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 that included the
reclassification of Cost of engineering and development revenues from advanced
engineering and development expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13,
“Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“ASU 2009-13”), and ASU 2009-14,
“Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements” (“ASU 2009-14”).
ASU 2009-13 amends the revenue guidance under Subtopic 605-25, “Multiple Element
Arrangements,” and addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving
multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting and how
arrangement consideration shall be measured and allocated to the separate units
of accounting in the arrangement. ASU 2009-14 excludes tangible products
containing software components and non-software components that function
together to deliver the product’s essential functionality from the scope of
Subtopic 985-605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 are
effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after June 15, 2010, which for the
Company is the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact that ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 will have on its consolidated
financial statements
In April
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (Topic
605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. This ASU codifies the consensus
reached in EITF Issue No. 08-9, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” The
amendments to the Codification provide guidance on defining a milestone and
determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue
recognition for research or development transactions. Consideration that is
contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as
revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone
is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. Milestones
should be considered substantive in their entirety and may not be bifurcated. An
arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones, and each
milestone should be evaluated individually to determine if it is
substantive.
ASU
2010-17 is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15,
2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the
period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year, the entity
should apply 2010-17 retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption.
Vendors may also elect to adopt the amendments in this ASU retrospectively for
all prior periods. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-17 to
have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
NOTE
4 - INVENTORIES
Inventory
balances are comprised of the following amounts as of June 30:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
631,656 |
|
|
$ |
766,881 |
|
Work
in progress
|
|
|
375,080 |
|
|
|
402,001 |
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
563,532 |
|
Inventory
valuation allowance
|
|
|
(304,200 |
) |
|
|
(145,301 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
702,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,587,113 |
|
NOTE
5– PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
Property,
plant, and equipment balances are comprised of the following amounts as of June
30:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Office
equipment
|
|
$ |
119,779 |
|
|
$ |
115,809 |
|
Manufacturing
equipment
|
|
|
3,591,508 |
|
|
|
4,626,178 |
|
Building
and improvements
|
|
|
1,996,134 |
|
|
|
1,996,134 |
|
Land
|
|
|
217,000 |
|
|
|
217,000 |
|
|
|
|
5,924,421 |
|
|
|
6,955,121 |
|
Less,
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,355,598 |
) |
|
|
(2,376,941 |
) |
Net
Property, Plant & Equipment
|
|
$ |
3,568,823 |
|
|
$ |
4,578,180 |
|
During
the year ended June 30, 2010, manufacturing equipment previously used in
production and development activities were identified as impaired or had reached
the end of their respective useful lives due to changing product and
manufacturing technologies. Upon write-down the manufacturing
equipment and accumulated depreciation accounts were adjusted accordingly and
$903,305 was charged to operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, and were
reported as impairment and other equipment charges.
NOTE
6 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
In March
2005, the Company acquired a 49% interest in ZBB China Pty Ltd for a cost of
$175,000 (estimated for current period foreign exchange rates). The joint
venture company was licensed to distribute ZBB energy storage systems into the
Chinese market.
On
October 2, 2008 a mutual agreement was reached to terminate the co-operative
joint venture agreement between ZBB and China Century Capital
Limited. The effect of this termination is to cancel the exclusive
manufacturing, marketing, and distribution rights granted by ZBB to the joint
venture company, ZBB China Pty Ltd, and provided for ZBB to hold 100% ownership
in this subsidiary.
During
the year ended June 30, 2009 the Company dissolved the joint venture, realizing
a loss on the investment of $15,369.
NOTE
7 – GOODWILL
The
Company acquired ZBB Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, through a
series of transactions in March 1996. The goodwill amount of $1.134
million, the difference between the price paid for ZBB Technologies, Inc. and
the net assets of the acquisition, amortized through fiscal 2002, resulted in
the net goodwill amount of $803,079 as of June 30, 2010.
The
Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with FASB ASC topic 350-20,
“Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Goodwill” under which goodwill and other
intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are
subject to annual impairment tests. The implied fair value of goodwill is the
amount determined by deducting the estimated fair value of all tangible and
identifiable intangible net assets of the reporting unit to which goodwill has
been allocated from the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. If the
recorded value of goodwill exceeds its implied value, an impairment charge is
recorded for the excess.
NOTE
8 – NOTE RECEIVABLE-Shareholder
In July
2006, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement with 41
Broadway Associates, LLC. Under the terms of the agreement the
Company sold to 41 Broadway Associates, LLC a total of 294,118 shares for a
total consideration of $1,000,000. Payments were to be paid in annual
installments of $200,000 plus accrued interest at 4% over a five year
period.
Both
parties also entered into a five year consulting agreement, which would have
provided approximately $200,000 of annual services including assistance with
debt and equity financing, investor introductions, marketing,
etc. During 2009 the Company determined the service agreement to be a
minimal future value and effectively cancelled the agreement as of June 30,
2009.
In
accordance with the terns of the note agreement, the cancellation of the service
agreement, in effect relieved the remaining balance of the note
receivable. Accordingly, the $408,333 remaining balance of the note
receivable was written off and applied to additional paid in capital at June 30,
2009.
NOTE
9 – COMMON STOCK AND WARRANT OFFERINGS
On April
30, 2009 the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC for
a $10 million universal shelf, which was declared effective by the SEC on May
13, 2009. The Company took this action as a proactive measure in
anticipation of our possible future needs to raise additional investment capital
to fund additional working capital and further capital expenditures. On
August 18, 2009, the Company completed a registered direct sale of 1,791,667
units at $1.20 per unit, consisting of an aggregate of 1,791,667 shares of its
common stock and warrants to purchase 358,333 shares of its common stock at an
exercise price of $1.33 per share. The proceeds to ZBB after deducting
placement agent fees and offering expenses were approximately $1.9
million. Proceeds are to be used for capital expenditures and
general corporate purposes.
On March
9, 2010, the Company completed a registered direct sale of 2,243,750 units at
$.80 per unit, consisting of an aggregate of 2,243,750 shares of its common
stock and warrants to purchase 1,121,875 shares of its common stock at an
exercise price of $1.04 per share. The proceeds to ZBB after deducting
placement agent fees and offering expenses were approximately $1.6
million. Proceeds are to be used for general corporate
purposes.
On March
31, 2010, the Company completed the closing of a private placement of
unregistered common stock. The purchasers of the stock were the company’s
Directors, Officers, and key employees. The Company sold 337,346 shares at
$.83 per share. The proceeds to ZBB were $280,000.
Proceeds are to be used for general corporate purposes.
NOTE
10 – BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE
The
Company's debt consisted of the following as of June 30:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Bank
loans-current
|
|
$ |
395,849 |
|
|
$ |
416,558 |
|
Bank
loans-long term
|
|
|
2,120,421 |
|
|
|
2,399,915 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,516,270 |
|
|
$ |
2,816,473 |
|
On July
1, 2009 the Company entered into a loan agreement to finance new production
equipment. The $156,000 bank note is secured by specific equipment,
requiring monthly payments of $4,736 of principal and interest; rate equal to
5.99% per annum; maturity date of December 1, 2013. Principal balance is
$107,155 at June 30, 2010.
On
November 28, 2008 the Company entered into a loan agreement to finance new
production equipment. The $1,070,000 bank note is secured by specific
equipment, requiring monthly payments of $21,000 of principal and interest; rate
equal to the prime rate; maturity date of July 1, 2012. Principal balance is
$733,536 at June 30, 2010.
On May
14, 2008 the Company entered into two loan agreements to refinance its building
and land in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin:
The first
loan requires a fixed monthly payment of principal and interest at a rate of
.25% below the prime rate, subject to a prime rate floor of 5.25%, with any
principal balance due at maturity on June 1, 2018 and secured by the building
and land. Principal balance is $805,084 at June 30,
2010.
The
second loan is a secured promissory note guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business
Administration, requiring monthly payments of principal and interest at a rate
of 5.5% until May 1, 2028. Principal balance is $821,595 at
June 30, 2010.
On
January 22, 2007 the Company refinanced its equipment loan. The new
loan term requires monthly principal payments and interest at a rate equal to
the prime rate, maturity date of February 1, 2011. The loan is
secured by a first lien on all business personal property. Principal
balance is $48,900 at June 30, 2010.
On April
7, 2010 the Company entered into two loan agreements to partially finance the
Company’s manufacturing expansion and working capital projects which are
expected to total $4.5 million, including $1.7 million equity funding, at its
facility in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.
The first
loan is for $1.3 million with the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. Payments of
principal and interest under this loan are deferred until May 31, 2012. The
interest rate is 0% until May 31, 2012 and 2% thereafter. Payments of $22,800
per month are required starting June 1, 2012 with a final payment due on May 1,
2017. The loan is secured by equipment purchased with loan proceeds and with a
General Business Security Agreement on all assets of the Company. The Company is
required to maintain and increase a specified number of employees, and the
interest rate is increased in certain cases for failure to meet this
requirement. This loan commitment expires October 31, 2010. There were no
advances under this loan as June 30, 2010.
The
second loan is a three year term secured promissory note for $1.5 million with
Investors Bank, requiring monthly payments of principal and interest at a rate
of 6.25% totaling $22,093. The loan is secured by all business assets including
$1.5 million cash collateral requirement. This loan commitment expires September
30, 2010. There were no advances under this loan as of June 30,
2010.
The
balance of the expansion and working capital project funds are required by the
Wisconsin Department of Commerce loan agreement to be provided by the Company in
the amount of $1.7 million.
Maximum
aggregate annual principal payments
for years subsequent to June 30, 2010 are as
follows:
2011
|
|
$ |
395,849 |
|
2012
|
|
|
363,710 |
|
2013
|
|
|
322,618 |
|
2014
|
|
|
81,648 |
|
2015
|
|
|
86,020 |
|
2016
and thereafter
|
|
|
1,266,425 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,516,270 |
|
NOTE
11 – EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS
For the
years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s results of operations reflect
compensation expense for stock options granted and restricted shares vested
under its equity incentive plans. The amount recognized in the financial
statements related to stock-based compensation was $527,439 and $338,864, based
on the grant date fair value of all options vested during the years ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
In 2002
the Company established the 2002 Stock Option Plan (“SOP”) whereby a stock
option committee was given the discretion to grant up to 579,107 options to
purchase shares to key employees of the Company at exercise prices and dates to
be determined by the directors. No options were exercised and 16,793 options
expired during the year ended June 30, 2009. During the year ended June 30,
2010, 150,000 options to purchase shares were granted to employees exercisable
at prices from $0.49 to $0.75 based on vesting terms of April 2011 through June
2013, and exercisable through June 2018, options for 87,907 shares expired, and
options for 75,000 shares were cancelled. At June 30, 2010 there were 475,000
options outstanding with exercise prices from $0.49 to $3.59 and exercise dates
up to June 2018. A further 104,107 options are available to be issued under the
SOP.
During
2005 the Company established an Employee Stock Option Scheme (the “2005 Plan”)
that authorizes the board of directors or a committee thereof, to grant options
to employees and directors of the Company or any affiliate of the Company. The
maximum number of options that may be granted in aggregate at any time under
this option scheme or under any other employee option or share plan is the
number equivalent to 5% of the total number of issued shares of the Company
including all shares underlying options under the Company’s stock option and
incentive plans... Options issued expire five years after the vesting date. No
options were issued or exercised during the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, 200,000 options were cancelled. At June 30,
2010, options to purchase 50,000 shares with an exercise price of $3.82 and an
expiration date of June 2012 are outstanding. A further 405,838 options are
available to be issued under the SOP.
During
2007 the Company established the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”)
that authorizes the board of directors or a committee thereof, to grant options
to purchase up to a maximum of 1,500,000 shares to employees and directors of
the Company at exercise prices to be determined by the administrator but not
less than 100% (110% for a 10% shareholder) of the market value on the date
granted. During the year ended June 30, 2009 options to purchase 451,410 shares
were granted to employees and directors exercisable at prices from $1.35 to
$1.69 based on vesting terms of July 2009 through January 2012 and exercisable
at various dates through December 2016. Included in the year ended June 30, 2009
options were granted to purchase 266,410 shares which vest upon certain
contingent performance criteria, of which 93,248 vested and 39,963 forfeited
during the period. During the year ended June 30, 2010 options to purchase
821,500 shares were granted to employees and directors exercisable at prices
from $0.95 to $1.39 based on vesting terms of September 2010 through April 2013
and exercisable at various dates through April 2018. Options to purchase an
additional 208,008 shares are available to be issued under the 2007
plan.
The
Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors awarded two
inducement option grants to the Company’s new CEO in January
2010. The first grant is an option to purchase 400,000 shares which
vests as to one-third of the shares on January 7, 2011 and as to the balance in
24 monthly installments beginning on January 31, 2011 and ending on December 31,
2012. This option vests in full upon a “change of control.” The
second grant is an option to purchase 100,000 shares of ZBB common stock which
vests in two equal installments based on the achievement of certain performance
targets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. The June 30, 2010
performance targets have been met and management expects the December 31, 2010
performance targets to be met. Both options have an exercise price of
$1.33 per share which was equal to the closing price of ZBB’s common stock on
January 7, 2010 and are not exercisable as to any portion of the option after
the fifth anniversary of the date on which that portion vests. The
options are subject to other terms and conditions specified in the related
option agreements.
In
aggregate for all plans, at June 30, 2010, the Company has a total of 2,316,992
options outstanding and 717,953 options available for future grant under the
SOP, 2005 and the 2007 Plans.
Information
with respect to stock option activity under the employee and director plans is
as follows:
Stock Option Activity
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,029,700 |
|
|
$ |
4.03 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
451,410 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
Options
expired
|
|
|
(16,793 |
) |
|
|
5.61 |
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
(39,963 |
) |
|
|
1.35 |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance
at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,424,354 |
|
|
$ |
3.24 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
1,471,500 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
(578,862 |
) |
|
|
3.49 |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,316,992 |
|
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
The
following table summarizes information relating to the stock options outstanding
at June 30, 2010:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
$0.49
to $1.69
|
|
|
1,666,992 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
|
729,492 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
$3.59
to $3.82
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,316,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
|
|
1,329,492 |
|
|
$ |
2.38 |
|
During
the year ended June 30, 2010 options to purchase 1,471,500 shares were granted
to directors and employees exercisable at prices from $0.49 to $1.39
per share based on various service based vesting terms from November 2010
through June 2013 and exercisable at various dates through June
2018.
The fair
value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing method. The Company uses historical data to
estimate the expected price volatility, the expected option life and the
expected forfeiture rate. The Company has not made any dividend payments nor
does it have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. The following
assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the
years ended June 30 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Expected
life of option (years)
|
2.5-4.75
|
|
2.5-4.75
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
.8
- 1.4%
|
|
1.2
- 1.4%
|
Assumed
volatility
|
62
- 70%
|
|
62
- 70%
|
Expected
dividend rate
|
0
|
|
0
|
Expected
forfeiture rate
|
0
|
|
0
|
Time-vested
and performance-based stock awards, including stock options and restricted
stock, are accounted for at fair value at date of grant. Compensation
expense is recognized over the requisite service and performance
periods.
A summary
of the status of unvested employee stock options as of June 30, 2010 and 2009
and changes during the years then ended, is presented below:
Unvested Stock Option Activity
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Per
Share
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
284,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
451,410 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(323,914 |
) |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(39,963 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Balance
at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
371,533 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,471,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(662,328 |
) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(193,205 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
987,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Total
fair value of options granted in fiscal 2010 and 2009 amounted to $853,582 and
$331.413 respectively. At June 30, 2010 there was $397,110 in
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which is
expected to be recognized over the next 3 years.
During
fiscal 2010 the board of directors authorized the immediate vesting of all
outstanding options issued to directors. As a result the Company
realized additional stock compensation expense of approximately $72,196 during
the year ended June 30, 2010.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 the Company agreed to compensate its directors
with restricted stock units (“RSUs”) rather than cash. As a result
included in accrued compensation and benefits at June 30, 2010 is $182,500
related to these awards. The RSUs are classified as liability awards because the
RSUs will be paid in cash upon vesting. The RSU award liability is measured at
its fair value at the end of each reporting period and, therefore, will
fluctuate based on the performance of the Company’s stock.
In
addition, under the 2007 Plan and in conjunction with a salary reduction plan
implemented during 2009, 101,014 restricted shares were granted as payment of
compensation, of which vesting was 75% service based and 25% performance
based. During the year ended June 30, 2010, $29,284 (net of $19,500
in forfeitures) was recognized as expense.
NOTE 12 - NON RELATED PARTY
WARRANTS
At June
30, 2010 there were outstanding warrants to purchase 1,121,875 shares acquired
by certain purchasers of Company shares in March 2010 exercisable at $1.04 per
share and which expire in September 2015.
At June
30, 2010 there were outstanding warrants to purchase 358,333 shares acquired by
certain purchasers of Company shares in August 2009 exercisable at $1.33 per
share and which expire in August 2015.
At June
30, 2010 there were outstanding warrants to purchase 120,023 shares acquired by
Empire Financial Group, Ltd. in 2006 exercisable at $3.23 per share and which
expire on in September 2011.
At June
30, 2010 there were outstanding warrants to purchase 50,000 shares acquired by
Empire Financial Group, Ltd. as part of the underwriting compensation in
connection with our United States public offering which are exercisable at $7.20
per share and which expire in June 2012.
At June
30, 2010 there are warrants to purchase 195,800 shares issued and outstanding to
Strategic Growth International in connection with capital raising activities in
2006 and 2007, with expiration dates between March 2011 and June 2012 and
exercise prices of between $3.75 and $7.20.
The table
below summarizes non-related party warrant balances:
Stock Warrants
Non-related parties
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
365,823 |
|
|
$ |
4.41 |
|
Warrants
granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
expired
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Warants
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
365,823 |
|
|
$ |
4.41 |
|
Warrants
granted
|
|
|
1,480,208 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
Warrants
expired
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Warants
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,846,031 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
NOTE
13 – SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
On August
30, 2010 we entered into an amended and restated securities purchase agreement
(“Socius Securities Purchase Agreement”) with Socius CG II, Ltd. (“Socius”).
Pursuant to the Socius Securities Purchase Agreement we have the right over a
term of two years, subject to certain conditions, to require Socius to purchase
up to $10 million of redeemable subordinated debentures and/or shares of
redeemable Series A preferred stock in one or more tranches. The
debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 10% and the shares of Series A
preferred stock accumulate dividends at the same rate. Both the
debentures and the shares of Series A preferred stock are redeemable at our
election at any time after the one year anniversary of
issuance. Neither the debentures nor the Series A preferred shares
are convertible into common stock. Shares of Series A preferred stock
are not yet authorized. Upon authorization, any outstanding
debentures will be automatically converted into shares of Series A preferred
stock.
Under the
Socius Securities Purchase Agreement, in connection with each tranche Socius
will be obligated to purchase that number of shares of our common stock equal in
value to 135% of the amount of the tranche at a per share price equal to the
closing bid price of the common stock on the trading day preceding our delivery
of the tranche notice (the “Investment Price”). Socius may pay for
the shares it elects to purchase under this investment right at its option, in
cash or a secured promissory note. Any such promissory note will bear
interest at 2.0% per year and be secured by securities owned by Socius with a
fair market value equal to the principal amount of the promissory note. The
entire principal balance and interest on the promissory note is due and payable
on the fourth anniversary of the date of the promissory note, and may be applied
by us toward the redemption of debentures or shares of Series A preferred stock
held by Socius.
Our
ability to submit a tranche notice is subject to certain conditions including
that: (1) a registration statement covering our sale of shares of common stock
to Socius in connection with the tranche is effective and (2) the issuance of
such shares would not result in Socius and its affiliates beneficially owning
more than 9.99% of our common stock. As of June 30, 2010 we had not
submitted any tranche notices under the Socius Securities Purchase
Agreement.
Under the
terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay Socius a
commitment fee in the form of shares of common stock or cash, at the option of
the Company. The amount of the commitment fee will be $500,000 if it is paid in
cash and $588,235 if it is paid in shares of common stock. Payment of the
commitment fee will occur 50% at the time of the first tranche and 50% at the
time of the second tranche. If not earlier paid, the commitment fee is payable
in full on the six-month anniversary of the effective date of the Securities
Purchase Agreement.
See Note
17 Subsequent Events.
NOTE
14 – COMMITMENTS
The
Company leases its Australian research and development facility from a
non-related Australian company expiring October 31, 2011. The current
rental is $63,261 per annum (A$72,431) and is subject to an annual CPI
adjustment.
Rent
expense was $48,827 and $53,456 for the year ended June 30, 2010 and
2009. The future payments required under the terms of the lease are
as follows:
For
the twelve months ending June 30:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
63,261 |
|
2011
|
|
|
21,087 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
84,348 |
|
The
Company has entered into employment contracts with executives and management
personnel. The contracts provide for salaries, bonuses and stock option grants,
along with other employee benefits. The employment contracts generally have no
set term and can be terminated by either party. There is a provision for
payments of three months to eighteen months of annual salary as severance if we
terminate a contract without cause, along with the acceleration of certain
unvested stock option grants.
On
October 31, 2009, the Company entered into a Resignation and Indemnification
Agreement (the “Indemnification Agreement”) with Robert J. Parry, its outgoing
CEO. As of June 30, 2010 the Company has accrued the entire $225,000
of future severance payments to be paid to Mr. Parry, in connection with his
retirement.
NOTE
15 - RETIREMENT PLANS
All
Australian based employees are entitled to varying degrees of benefits on
retirement, disability, or death. The Company contributes to an
accumulation fund on behalf of the employees under an award which is legally
enforceable. For U.S. employees, the Company has a 401(k)
plan. All active participants are 100% vested
immediately. Expenses under these plans were $119,247 and $76,303 for
the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
NOTE
16— INCOME TAXES
The
Company did not record a provision for federal, state or foreign income taxes
for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The Company has not
recorded a benefit for deferred tax assets as its realizability is
uncertain.
The
Company’s combined effective income tax rate differed from the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Income
tax benefit computed at the federal statutory rate
|
|
|
-34 |
% |
|
|
-34 |
% |
Foreign
rate differential
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Change
in valuation allowance
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Significant
components of the Company's net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009
were as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
11,113,835 |
|
|
$ |
8,255,175 |
|
Foreign
loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,386,125 |
|
|
|
971,952 |
|
Deferred
tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(12,499,960 |
) |
|
|
(9,227,127 |
) |
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
As of
June 30, 2010, the Company had U.S net operating loss carry forwards of
approximately $33,100,000 which begins to expire in 2014 for federal tax
purposes. The Company also has gross foreign tax loss carry forwards of
approximately $4,600,000 that are available to offset future liabilities for
foreign income taxes. Substantially all of the foreign tax losses are carried
forward indefinitely, subject to certain limitations.
A
valuation allowance has been established for certain future income tax benefits
related to income tax loss carry forwards and temporary tax adjustments based on
an assessment that it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be
realized. During the year ended June 30, 2010 the valuation allowance increased
by $3.2 million
NOTE 17 —
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The
Company received $490,000 on the $1.3 million Wisconsin Department of Commerce
loan in July 2009.
On
September 2, 2010 we delivered the first tranche notice under the Socius
Securities Purchase Agreement (See Note 13) pursuant to which Socius will be
required to purchase from us $517,168 of debentures. The closing of
the sale of debentures, which is subject to satisfaction of customary closing
conditions, is anticipated to occur on September 20, 2010. In
connection with the tranche, (1) Socius purchased 1,163,629 shares of common
stock for a total purchase price of $698,177 and at a per share purchase price
of $0.60 and (2) we issued to Socius 490,196 shares of common stock in payment
of the commitment fee payable by us to Socius in connection with the initial
tranche under the securities purchase agreement. Socius paid for the shares of
common stock it purchased with a secured promissory note maturing September 2,
2014.
Item
9. Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Not
applicable.
Item 9A.
Controls
and Procedures
(a)
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as
such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation,
our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file
or submit, under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms.
(b)
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the
Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework, our management concluded that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010.
(c)
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to
attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to an exemption for smaller reporting companies under Section 989G of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. (d)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that
occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Item
9B. Other
Information
Not
applicable.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive
Officers and Corporate Governance
The
information required under this item is set forth in the Company’s Definitive
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on November 10, 2010 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
11. Executive
Compensation
The
information required under this item is set forth in the Company’s Definitive
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on November 10, 2010 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
12.
|
Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
|
The
information required under this item is set forth in the Company’s Definitive
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on November 10, 2010 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The
information required under this item is set forth in the Company’s Definitive
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on November 10, 2010 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees
and Services
The
information required under this item is set forth in the Company’s Definitive
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on November 10, 2010 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial
Statement Schedules
Financial
Statements
The
following financial statements are included in Item 8 of this Annual
Report:
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
28
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
29
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
30
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years ended June 30,
2010 and 2009
|
31
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
32
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
Financial
statement schedules have been omitted because they either are not applicable or
the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or
notes thereto.
Exhibits
The
Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits required to be filed with
this report is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K Annual Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned on September 10, 2010, thereunto duly
authorized.
ZBB
ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
/s/ Eric
C.Apfelbach
|
Eric C.Apfelbach
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
(Principal
Executive Officer) and
Director
|
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Form 10-K Annual Report has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
Position
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Eric C.
Apfelbach
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Eric
C. Apfelbach
|
|
(Principal
executive officer) and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott W.
Scampini
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Scott
W. Scampini
|
|
(Principal
financial officer and Principal
accounting
officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul F.
Koeppe
|
|
Director
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Paul
F. Koeppe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard A.
Abdoo
|
|
Director
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Richard A. Abdoo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Manfred
Birnbaum
|
|
Director
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Manfred Birnbaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard A.
Payne
|
|
Director
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
Richard A. Payne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
Mundell
|
|
Director
|
|
September
10, 2010
|
William Mundell
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
3.1
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of ZBB Energy Corporation as amended dated
February 16, 1998, as amended
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on
October 27, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of ZBB Energy Corporation (as of November 16,
2009)
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on
September 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form
of Stock Certificate
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed on April 13, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, attached as Exhibit C to Exhibit 10.7
attached hereto
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form
of Warrant
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form
of Debenture
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock Issued to Socius CG II, Ltd. dated August 30,
2010
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Letter
Agreement dated as of July 13, 2006 between ZBB Energy Corporation, 41
Broadway Associates, LLC
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed on March 19, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Contract
dated as of June 29, 2007 between ZBB Technologies Ltd and the
Commonwealth of Australia
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on
September 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment
agreement dated August 18, 2010 between ZBB Energy Corporation
and Scott Scampini
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
2002
Stock Option Plan of ZBB Energy Corporation
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on
April 16, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2005
Employee Stock Option Scheme of ZBB Energy Corporation
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on
October 27, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
2007
Equity Incentive Plan of ZBB Energy Corporation
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on
April 16, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement, dated August 13, 2009, entered into between ZBB
Energy Corporation and CapStone Investments and each purchaser signatory
thereto
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14,
2009
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
10.8
|
|
Resignation
and Indemnification Agreement by and between the Company and Robert J.
Parry dated as of October 31, 2009
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Director
Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement by and between the Company and Paul F.
Koeppe dated as of November 2, 2009
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Agreement
dated January 7, 2010 by and between the Company and Eric C.
Apfelbach
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Restrictive
Covenant Agreement dated January 7, 2010 by and between the Company and
Eric C. Apfelbach
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Nonstatutory
Stock Option Agreement dated January 7, 2010 by and between the Company
and Eric C. Apfelbach (performance-based)
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Nonstatutory
Stock Option Agreement dated January 7, 2010 by and between the Company
and Eric C. Apfelbach (time-based).
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Agreement
dated February 3, 2010 by and between the Company and Steven A.
Seeker
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Placement
Agent Agreement, dated March 1, 2010, by and between ZBB Energy
Corporation and Sutter Securities Incorporated
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 09,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated March 8, 2010, by and between ZBB Energy
Corporation and the purchasers signatory thereto
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 09,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Form
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 19, 2010
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amended
and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement by and between ZBB Energy
Corporation and Socius CG II, Ltd., dated August 30,
2010
|
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act, promulgated to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act, promulgated pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed
herewith
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed
herewith
|