UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended June
30,
2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
000-50866
DOLLAR FINANCIAL
CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-2636866
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or
Organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1436 Lancaster Avenue
|
|
19312-1288
|
Berwyn, Pennsylvania
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(610) 296-3400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
Not applicable
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files) Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K: þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2009, 24,228,074 shares of the
registrants common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were
outstanding. As of such date the aggregate market value of
voting stock (based upon the last reported sales price in The
Nasdaq Global Select Market) held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was approximately $572,751,669. As of July 31,
2010, the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding was
24,360,615.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed in
connection with its solicitation of proxies for its Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 11, 2010, is
incorporated by reference to Part III of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K,
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
Table of
Contents
2010
Report on
Form 10-K
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the documents incorporated herein contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Those statements are therefore entitled to the
protection of the safe harbor provisions of these laws. These
forward-looking statements, which are usually accompanied by
words such as may, might,
will, should, could,
intends, estimates,
predicts, potential,
continue, believes,
anticipates, plans, expects
and similar expressions, involve risks and uncertainties, and
relate to, without limitation, statements about our market
opportunities, anticipated improvements in operations, our
plans, earnings, cash flow and expense estimates, strategies and
prospects, both business and financial. There are important
factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity,
performance or achievements to differ materially from those
expressed or forecasted in, or implied by, such forward-looking
statements, particularly those factors discussed in
Item 1A - Risk Factors in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these
forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions, no assurance can be given that such expectations
will be attained or that any deviations will not be material. In
light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the
forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
may not occur and our actual results could differ materially and
adversely from those anticipated or implied in the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as
otherwise required by law, we disclaim any obligation or
undertaking to disseminate any update or revision to any
forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change
in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is
based. If we do update or modify one or more forward-looking
statements, you should not conclude that we will make additional
updates or modifications with respect thereto or with respect to
other forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
(i) the terms fiscal year and
fiscal refer to (i) the twelve-month period
ended on June 30 of the specified year, (ii) references to
$, dollars, United States
dollars or U.S. dollars refer to the
lawful currency of the United States of America,
(iii) references to CAD refer to the lawful
currency of Canada, and (iv) references to GBP
refer to the British Pound Sterling, the lawful currency of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
1
General
We are a leading international diversified financial services
company serving primarily unbanked and under-banked consumers.
Through our retail storefront locations as well as by other
means, such as via the Internet, we provide a range of consumer
financial products and services in five countries, Canada, the
United Kingdom, the United States, the Republic of Ireland
and Poland, to customers who, for reasons of convenience and
accessibility, purchase some or all of their financial services
from us rather than from banks and other financial institutions.
We believe that our customers, many of whom receive income on an
irregular basis or from multiple employers, are drawn to our
convenient neighborhood locations and Internet sites, extended
operating hours and high-quality customer service. Our products
and services, principally our short-term consumer loans, check
cashing services, secured pawn loans and gold buying services,
provide customers with immediate access to cash for living
expenses or other needs. We strive to offer our customers
additional high-value ancillary services, including Western
Union®
money order and money transfer products, electronic tax filing,
reloadable prepaid
VISA®
and
MasterCard®
debit cards, foreign currency exchange and prepaid local and
long-distance phone services.
During fiscal 2010, we completed several acquisitions in
furtherance of our objective to expand upon and diversify from
our core retail financial services businesses in Canada, the
United Kingdom and the United States described in the
preceding paragraph. Through our branded Military Installment
Loan and Education Services, or
MILES®,
program offered by our Dealers Financial Services, LLC
subsidiary, which we acquired in December 2009, we provide fee
based services to enlisted military personnel applying for loans
to purchase new and used vehicles that are funded and serviced
under an exclusive agreement with a major third-party national
bank. In April 2010, we expanded our pawn lending activities in
the United Kingdom through our acquisition of
Suttons & Robertsons, the fourth largest pawn lending
business in the United Kingdom whose three London-based stores
focus on retail and pawn lending for high value gold jewelry,
watches and diamonds. We also expanded our offerings for small
business retail customers through our October 2010 acquisition
of a U.K.-based provider of merchant cash advances which are
repaid by the borrowers future credit card receipts. In
late fiscal 2009, we acquired both a business that offers
longer-term installment consumer loans in Poland with an in-home
servicing feature, as well as an Internet-based short-term
consumer loan business in the United Kingdom.
As we continue to diversify our organization, we expect the
contributions to our revenue and profitability from fee-based
financial processing and origination services to increase.
During fiscal 2010, approximately 50% of our total consolidated
revenue was comprised of products and services which generally
carry little or no credit risk, such as check cashing, money
transfers, gold purchasing, secured pawn lending and fee-based
income generated from the MILES program.
We believe that our networks of retail locations in Canada and
the United Kingdom are the largest of their kind in each of
those countries, and that we have a strong presence in states
with favorable regulations in the United States. As of
June 30, 2010, our global retail operations consisted of
1,180 locations, of which 1,058 are company-owned, conducting
business primarily under the names Money
Mart®,
Money
Shop®,
Loan
Mart®,
Money
Corner®,
Insta-Cheques®
and The Check Cashing
Store®
in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and the
Republic of Ireland.
We manage our business as five operating segments
our financial services offerings in each of Canada, the United
Kingdom, the United States and Poland, as well as our recently
acquired Dealers Financial Services, LLC subsidiary,
which we operate independently of our other businesses.
Information regarding total assets, operating results and other
financial information regarding each of our reporting segments
for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008, 2009 and
2010 is set forth in Item 8. Financial
Data Note 18 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
2
Our
Industry
We operate in a sector of the financial services industry that
serves the basic needs of individuals and small businesses
needing quick and convenient access to cash and other financial
services. These needs are primarily evidenced by consumer demand
for short-term consumer and small business loans, check cashing,
secured pawn lending, money transfers, prepaid debit cards,
foreign currency exchange and other services. Consumers who use
these services are often underserved by banks and other
financial institutions.
Service sector and self-employed individuals represent the
largest portion of the population in each of the countries in
which we operate. Many of these individuals do not maintain
regular banking relationships. They use services provided by our
industry for a variety of reasons, including that they lack
sufficient assets to maintain minimum balance requirements or to
achieve the benefits of savings with banks, do not write enough
checks to make a bank account beneficial, have a dislike or
distrust of banks, or do not have a neighborhood bank in close
proximity to them. Many of these individuals periodically
require short-term loans to provide cash necessary for living
and other episodic expenses. They may not be able, or even
desire, to obtain loans from banks as a result of their
immediate need for cash, the irregular receipt of payments from
their employers, or the unavailability of bank loans in small
denominations for short time periods. For those who do maintain
banking relationships, our industry provides an alternative to
the generally high cost of overdraft fees charged by their banks
for overdrawn accounts.
Despite the demand for basic financial services, access to banks
has become increasingly difficult for a significant segment of
consumers. Many banks have chosen to close their less profitable
or lower-traffic locations and to otherwise reduce the hours
during which they operate at such locations. Typically, these
closings have occurred in neighborhoods where the branches have
failed to attract a sufficient base of customer deposits. This
trend has resulted in fewer convenient alternatives for basic
financial services in many neighborhoods. Furthermore,
traditional banks have tended in recent years to eliminate, or
have made it difficult or relatively expensive to obtain, many
of the services that under-banked consumers desire.
As a result of these developments, a significant number of
businesses offer financial services to service sector and
self-employed individuals. The providers of these services are
generally fragmented, and range from specialty finance offices
to retail stores in other industries that offer ancillary
financial services.
While the mix of products offered may vary, we believe that the
under-banked consumer markets in each of the countries in which
we operate will continue to grow as a result of a diminishing
supply of competing banking services as well as underlying
demographic trends. These demographic trends include an overall
increase in the population in each of our markets and an
increase in the number of self-employed, small business and
service sector jobs as a percentage of the total workforce.
The demographics of the typical customers for non-banking
financial services vary somewhat in each of the markets in which
we operate. The type of store and services that appeal to
customers in each market differs based on cultural, social,
geographic, economic and other factors. The composition of
providers of these services in each market results, in part,
from the historical development and regulatory environment in
that market.
Our
Markets
We operate primarily in three geographical markets, Canada, the
United Kingdom and the United States. In addition to operating
our traditional storefront locations in the United States, we
also provide, through our Dealers Financial Services, LLC
subsidiary and its MILES program, fee-based services to
U.S. enlisted military personnel applying for automotive
loans through a third party national bank. In addition to our
storefront locations in the United Kingdom, we also provide
Internet based lending. We also entered the Polish market in
fiscal 2009 through our acquisition of a controlling interest
(76%) in Optima, S.A., a consumer installment lender based in
Gdansk, Poland.
3
Canada
We believe that we are the leading financial services company in
Canada serving unbanked and under-banked consumers. We estimate
that, across Canada, there are approximately 1,500 individual
outlets offering single-payment consumer loans
and/or check
cashing, including only two other networks of stores exceeding
100 locations in Canada. We operate the largest store network in
Canada based upon store revenues and profitability, and thereby
we believe that we have the largest market share in Canada in
our sector.
As of June 30, 2010, our Canadian network consists of 465
financial services stores, of which 403 are company-owned and 62
are operated by franchisees. We are located in 12 of the 13
Canadian provinces and territories, with 228 locations in
Ontario, 83 locations in British Columbia, 73 locations in
Alberta, 20 locations in Manitoba and 61 locations in the
other Canadian provinces and territories. We have at least one
store in nearly every Canadian city with a population exceeding
50,000.
Our Canadian stores typically offer short-term consumer loans,
check cashing, Western Union money orders and money transfer
products, prepaid debit cards, gold buying and other ancillary
products and services. We also recently opened our first pawn
broking store in Toronto and offer short term consumer loans via
the Internet as well. All of our stores in Canada operate under
the name Money Mart, except our locations in
Québec, which operate under the name Instant
Cheques and do not offer short-term consumer loans.
United
Kingdom
Based on information from the British Cheque Cashers
Association, we believe that our U.K. stores represent
approximately 30% of all stores in the United Kingdom operating
in our sector. In addition, we believe that our
382 company-operated and franchised and agent-operated
stores account for approximately 40% of the total check cashing
transactions performed at check cashing stores in the United
Kingdom as of June 30, 2010. Like in Canada, we believe we
operate the largest store network in our sector based upon store
revenues and profitability and thereby we believe we have the
largest market share in our sector.
As of June 30, 2010, our United Kingdom network consisted
of 382 stores, of which 329 are operated by us and 53 are
operated by franchisees or agents. We believe this to be the
largest store network in the United Kingdom in our sector.
Our stores are located in each of the constituent countries of
the United Kingdom, with 325 locations in England, 27
locations in Scotland, 13 locations in Wales and 17 locations in
Northern Ireland. We also currently have one store in the
Republic of Ireland which we include in our United Kingdom
operating segment.
Our financial services stores in the United Kingdom typically
offer short-term consumer loans, check cashing, Western Union
money transfers, secured pawn lending, foreign currency
exchange, gold buying and other ancillary products and services.
Most of our stores in the United Kingdom operate under the name
Money Shop, with the exception of certain franchises
which operate under the name Cash A Cheque. In
addition to our traditional financial services stores, we also
operate two traditional pawn shops located in Edinburgh and
Glasgow, Scotland under the name Robert Biggar Ltd.
and three high-end pawn shops in London, England under the names
T.M. Suttons, Robertsons, and
Suttons & Robertsons. We also provide
Internet-based consumer lending products in the United Kingdom
under the name Payday Express and merchant cash
advances which are repaid by future credit card receipts under
the name Business Cash Advance.
United
States Retail
We believe that we operate one of the largest U.S. check
cashing store networks. Depending on location, our financial
services store locations offer a range of financial products and
services, including check cashing, short-term consumer loans,
Western Union transfers and money orders, prepaid debit cards,
gold buying and other ancillary services. As of June 30,
2010, we operated a total of 325 financial services stores in
the United States in 15 states, including 104 stores
in Florida, 99 stores in California, 19 stores in Arizona,
18 stores in Louisiana and 85 stores in 11 other states. We
operate our stores in the United States primarily under the
names Money Mart and The Check Cashing
Store.
4
DFS
and the MILES Program
In addition to our network of storefront retail financial
services stores in the United States, we also offer our branded
Military Installment Loan and Education Services, or MILES
program through our Dealers Financial Services, LLC
subsidiary (DFS). DFS provides fee-based services to junior
enlisted military personnel seeking to purchase new and used
vehicles, including access to loans through an exclusive
agreement with a major third-party national bank and other
ancillary products and services including service contracts and
guaranteed asset protection (GAP) insurance. DFS operates
through an established network with approximately 600 franchised
and independent new and used car dealerships, in 23 states,
that are in close proximity to significant military
installations in the United States. Notwithstanding this
extensive presence, we believe that there are opportunities to
expand the MILES program geographically, to increase its
penetration in certain markets, to expand its product offerings
and to increase its penetration with more tenured enlisted
military personnel with higher pay grade levels. We operate DFS
as a stand-alone business within our corporate structure that is
separate from our United States retail store operations, and we
report its results of operations as a separate operating segment.
Poland
Through our 76% controlling interest in Optima, S.A. (Optima),
an established installment consumer lending business, we offer
relatively longer-term consumer installment loans with terms of
approximately
40-50 weeks
in duration with an average loan amount of $250 to $500. These
loans include an in-home servicing feature. Customer sales and
service activities are managed through an extensive network of
local commission based representatives across seven provinces in
Poland. Poland has a population of nearly 40 million
people, with a significant percentage of the population
currently underserved by the traditional banking industry. Our
investment in Optima represents a planned first step into
mainland Europe which we believe will also provide a platform
for further expansion throughout Poland and other Eastern
European countries. The demographics of neighboring Eastern
European countries are similar to that of Poland, with the
entire population of Eastern Europe approaching 200 million
people across several countries, with a significant percentage
of the population residing in urban-industrial areas.
Our
Strategy
Our business strategy is designed to capitalize on our
competitive strengths and enhance our leading position in each
of the markets in which we operate, to enter new markets and to
strengthen our overall business. Key elements of our strategy
include:
Growth through Disciplined Expansion and
Acquisition Since 1990, we have completed
nearly 100 acquisitions worldwide that have added over
790 company-owned financial services stores to our network,
as well as new products, lending and other services platforms
and expansion into additional countries, in each case with a
continuing focus on serving the service sector workforce, small
businesses and under-banked consumers generally. We intend to
continue to grow our network through the addition of new stores
and acquisitions and expansion of our financial services
platforms, including fee based processing and origination
services, while adhering to a disciplined selection process. We
seek to carefully assess potential markets by analyzing
demographic, competitive and regulatory factors, site selection
and availability and growth potential. With respect to our core
financial services businesses in Canada and the United Kingdom
in particular, we intend and continue to add storefront
locations that offer consumer lending, check cashing, debit
cards, foreign currency, secured pawn lending, gold buying and
other services, or a combination of any of these products and
services.
In addition to expanding our existing networks of financial
services stores in Canada and the United Kingdom, we also
intend to continue our efforts both to expand our business
geographically as well as to diversify into new business lines
and financial platform delivery methods that complement our
existing businesses, or that otherwise present an opportunity to
leverage our knowledge of our core customer segments. For
example, in fiscal 2009, we entered the growing Eastern European
market with our acquisition of Poland-based Optima, which
specializes in consumer installment loans. With our fiscal
5
2009 acquisition of a U.K.-based online consumer lending
platform, we leveraged our credit analytics knowledge and
increased our expertise within the Internet lending arena, which
expertise we believe can be leveraged and exported to other
European countries as well as to Canada.
With our acquisition of DFS and its MILES program in December
2009, we have diversified into a business that operates in an
entirely different market than our core retail financial
services stores, yet adheres to our core focus of serving credit
challenged individuals. DFS revenue comes both from fees
which are paid by a major third-party national bank and fees
from auto dealers as well as from fees generated by the sale of
ancillary products such as warranty service contracts and GAP
insurance coverage. At present, DFS business is solely
focused on providing services to U.S. enlisted military
personnel applying for auto loans to purchase new and late
model, low mileage used vehicles. Through DFS, we currently
provide services to approximately 110 U.S. military
communities covering the majority of all U.S. military
bases. We operate DFS as a standalone business unit in order to
foster DFS focus on leveraging its existing dealership
network and lending platform to other related customer segments
through a number of planned proprietary strategic growth
initiatives.
We continue to actively seek to acquire targeted competitor
operations in selected expansion markets in Canada, the United
Kingdom and Europe as well as attractive fee-based financial
services businesses like DFS.
Introduction of Related Products and
Services We offer a wide range of consumer
financial products and services to meet the demands of our
customers in each of the areas in which we do business,
including short-term consumer loans, check cashing, money orders
and money transfer services, and secured pawn lending. To
supplement these core products, we seek to provide high-value
ancillary products and services, including electronic tax
filing, bill payment, foreign currency exchange, reloadable VISA
and MasterCard brand debit cards, gold buying, and prepaid local
and long-distance phone services. These products and services
enable our customers to manage their personal finances more
effectively, and we continue to expand our service offerings to
our customers. For example, during fiscal 2009, we began
providing gold buying services in the United Kingdom and expand
these services to Canada and the United States in fiscal 2010.
Our broad product and geographic mix provides a diverse stream
of revenue growth opportunities that we believe distinguishes us
from others in our industry.
Capitalizing on our Enhanced Network and System
Capabilities With our networks of stores
across Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, we
believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on economies
of scale. Our centralized core support functions, including
credit analytics, collections, call centers, field operations
and service, loan processing and tax filing, enable us to
generate efficiencies by improving collections and leveraging
purchasing power with our vendors. We use our proprietary
systems to support our customer relations, consumer lending and
loan servicing activities, as well as to provide an efficient
means to manage our internal reporting requirements and
regulatory compliance activities. We plan to continue to take
advantage of these efficiencies to further enhance our network
and store-level profitability.
Maintaining our Customer-Driven Retail
Philosophy We strive to maintain our
customer-service-oriented approach and to meet the basic and
diversified financial service needs of our customers. We believe
our approach differentiates us from many of our competitors and
is a key tenet of our employee training programs. We offer
extended operating hours in clean, attractive and secure store
locations to enhance appeal and stimulate store traffic. In
certain locations, we operate stores that are open 24 hours
a day. To ensure customer satisfaction, we periodically send
anonymous market researchers posing as shoppers to our stores to
measure customer service performance. We intend to continue to
develop ways to improve our performance, including incentive
programs that reward employees for exceptional customer service.
Community Involvement, Ethics and Customer
Education We believe that we strengthen our
relationships with our business partners through ethical
behavior and with our customers through community involvement.
We encourage the management of each of our stores to involve
themselves with
6
their respective local communities. During fiscal 2010 our
global business units contributed approximately
$1.0 million in charitable contributions, including over
$0.3 million to the Haiti earthquake relief effort and over
$0.5 million to various childrens health and welfare
organizations.
We believe that it is our responsibility, and in the best
interests of us and our customers, to provide our customers
guidance on financial matters and education about our products
and services. As a part of our commitment to the long-term
financial health of our customers, in the majority of our
markets we encourage our customers to contact our consumer
education department for guidance or to report any concerns
related to our company loan and other products. We have
undertaken consumer education initiatives to advance and support
financial education and literacy programs in the communities
that we serve, as well as to promote responsible use of our
products. Core components of the program include consumer
brochures, social media posts, non-profit and charitable grant
offerings to support financial education programs, free
on-line
financial literacy training, and the creation of a consumer
education section on our websites.
Our
Products and Services
Short-Term
Consumer Lending
We offer a variety of short-term loan products and credit
services in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and
Poland to customers who typically cannot access other
traditional sources of credit such as from banks and family
members. Many customers find our short loan products to be a
more attractive alternative than borrowing from friends or
family or incurring insufficient fund fees, overdraft protection
fees, utility reconnect fees and other charges imposed when they
have insufficient cash. By utilizing our loan products, our
customers can exercise greater control of their personal
finances without damaging the relationship they have with their
merchants, service providers and family members.
We originate unsecured, single-payment short-term consumer loans
at most of our retail financial service locations in Canada, the
United Kingdom and the United States. We bear the entire risk of
loss related to these loans. We originated approximately
$1.7 billion of single-payment, short-term consumer loans
during fiscal 2009 and approximately $1.8 billion during
fiscal 2010.
Our single-payment short-term consumer loan products provide
customers with cash in exchange for a promissory note or other
repayment agreement supported, in most cases, by the
customers personal check or an authorization to debit the
customers account via an Automated Clearing House (ACH)
transaction for the amount due. The customer may repay the loan
in cash or by allowing the check to be presented for collection
by manual deposit or an electronic debit ACH for the amount due.
In Canada, single-payment short-term consumer loans are issued
to qualified borrowers based on a percentage of the
borrowers income in amounts up to CAD 1,500, with typical
repayment terms of 1 to 35 days. We issue single payment
short-term consumer loans in the United Kingdom for up to GBP
750, with a maximum term of 30 days. In the United States,
these loans are made for amounts up to $1,000, with terms of 7
to 45 days.
We also offer single payment short-term consumer loans via the
Internet in the United Kingdom and in the provinces of Ontario
and Alberta, Canada. We intend to increase our presence in the
Internet-based short-term consumer lending space in Canada and
the United Kingdom, as well as throughout Europe, through both
strategic acquisitions as well as by leveraging our experience
in credit analytics and the online lending marketplace.
In addition to our lending activities in Canada, the United
Kingdom and the United States, we offer unsecured loans in
Poland of generally 40 to 50 week durations with average
loan amounts of $250 to $500. The loan transaction includes a
convenient in-home servicing feature, whereby loan disbursement
and collection activities take place in the customers home
according to a mutually agreed upon and pre-arranged schedule.
The in-home loan servicing concept is well established and
accepted within Poland and Eastern Europe, and was initially
established in Britain nearly a century ago. Customer sales and
service activities are managed through an extensive network of
local commission based representatives and market managers
across seven provinces in northwestern Poland.
7
Because our revenue from our consumer lending activities is
generated through a high volume of small-dollar financial
transactions, our exposure to loss from a single customer
transaction is minimal. Collection activities are, however, an
important aspect of our operations, particularly with respect to
our consumer loan products due to the relatively high incidence
of unpaid balances beyond stated terms. We have instituted
control mechanisms and a credit analytics function that have
been very effective in managing risk in our consumer lending
activities. We operate centralized collection centers to
coordinate a consistent approach to customer service and
collections in each of our markets. Our risk control mechanisms
include, among others, the daily monitoring of initial return
rates with respect to payments made on our consumer loan
portfolio. We have also implemented proprietary predictive
scoring models that are designed to limit the amount of loans we
offer to customers who statistically would likely be unable to
repay their loan. As a result, we believe that we are less
likely to sustain a significant credit loss from a series of
transactions or launch of a new product.
We had approximately $114.7 million and $138.3 million
of net consumer loans outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively. These amounts are reflected on our audited
balance sheets included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as loans receivable, net. Loans receivable, net at June 30,
2009 and 2010 are reported net of a reserve of
$12.1 million and $16.8 million, respectively, related
to consumer lending. Loans in default as of June 30, 2009
was $6.4 million, net of a $17.0 million allowance,
and was $7.3 million, net of a $14.4 million allowance
at June 30, 2010. See Item 8. Financial
Statements Note 2 in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for more information regarding our company-funded loan loss
reserve policy.
The following table presents a summary of our consumer lending
originations, including loan extensions and revenues, for the
following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Retail company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
$
|
535,542
|
|
|
$
|
582,074
|
|
|
$
|
500,329
|
|
Canadian company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
953,157
|
|
|
|
776,345
|
|
|
|
792,331
|
|
U.K. company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
330,331
|
|
|
|
358,728
|
|
|
|
500,363
|
|
Poland company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
$
|
1,819,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,147
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,804,709
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Retail servicing revenues, gross
|
|
$
|
2,556
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. Retail company-funded consumer loan revenues
|
|
|
77,282
|
|
|
|
77,625
|
|
|
|
65,675
|
|
Canadian company-funded consumer loan revenues
|
|
|
147,313
|
|
|
|
121,518
|
|
|
|
147,851
|
|
U.K. company-funded consumer loan revenues
|
|
|
55,329
|
|
|
|
65,376
|
|
|
|
98,889
|
|
Poland company-funded consumer loan revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer lending revenues
|
|
$
|
282,480
|
|
|
$
|
266,506
|
|
|
$
|
319,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross charge-offs of company-funded consumer loans
|
|
$
|
217,476
|
|
|
$
|
185,563
|
|
|
$
|
164,019
|
|
Recoveries of company-funded consumer loans
|
|
|
(163,719
|
)
|
|
|
(130,912
|
)
|
|
|
(122,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs on company-funded consumer loans
|
|
$
|
53,757
|
|
|
$
|
54,651
|
|
|
$
|
41,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross charge-offs of company-funded consumer loans as a
percentage of total company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
Recoveries of company-funded consumer loans as a percentage of
total company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Net charge-offs on company-funded consumer loans as a percentage
of total company-funded consumer loan originations
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
8
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the United States Retail, the increase for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2009 is primarily related to our
acquisitions of The Check Cashing Store and American Payday
Loans in fiscal 2008, partially offset by a reduction in the
number of our U.S. stores. In Canada and the United Kingdom,
fiscal 2009 includes a net decline of $112.1 million and
$94.6 million, respectively, over fiscal 2008 as a result
of the translational impact of exchange rates for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009. The effects of the global
economic recession also resulted in diminished loan originations
for the 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. |
|
(2) |
|
The increase for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 is
primarily due to the acquisitions of Express Finance Limited in
the United Kingdom and Optima, S.A. in Poland, partially offset
by a decrease in the United States related to a reduction in the
number our of U.S. stores. Additionally, in fiscal 2010, there
was a $69.8 million increase in Canada and an
$8.7 million decrease in the United Kingdom compared to
fiscal 2009 as a result of the impact of exchange rates for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The effects of the global
economic recession also resulted in diminished loan originations
for the 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. |
Check
Cashing
Customers may cash all types of checks at our check cashing
locations, including payroll checks, insurance proceeds checks,
government checks and personal checks. In exchange for a
verified check, customers receive cash immediately and do not
have to wait several days for the check to clear. Before we
distribute cash, we verify both the customers
identification and the validity of the check, occasionally using
multiple sources, as required by our standard verification
procedures. Customers are charged a fee for this service, which
is typically calculated as a percentage of the face value of the
check. The fee varies depending on the size and type of check
cashed as well as the customers check cashing history at
our stores.
Since the beginning of fiscal 2009, the number and aggregate
face value of checks that we have cashed at our stores has
declined in all of our geographical core markets. Studies by the
Federal Reserve Board and others suggest that payments made by
electronic means may be displacing a portion of the paper checks
traditionally cashed by our customers. Moreover, we believe that
the recent significant global downturn, which has affected all
of the countries in which we operate, and the continuing high
unemployment rates, have significantly contributed to the
decline in our check cashing business. In response to these
developments, we have increased our focus on cashing payroll and
commercial checks, which tend to have higher face values and
therefore result in higher check cashing fees than government
checks.
Other
Retail Services and Products
In addition to short-term consumer loans and check cashing
services, we offer our customers a variety of financial and
other products and services at our retail locations. These
services, which vary from store to store, include Western Union
money order and money transfer products, secured pawn lending,
gold buying, electronic tax filing, bill payment, foreign
currency exchange, VISA and MasterCard branded reloadable debit
cards, and prepaid local and long-distance phone services. Among
our most significant other financial services products and
services are:
Money Transfers. Through a strategic alliance
with Western Union in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United
States, our customers can transfer funds to any location in the
world providing Western Union money transfer services.
Western Union currently has approximately 430,000 agents in more
than 200 countries throughout the world. We receive a percentage
of the commission charged by Western Union for each money
transfer transaction. For fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, we
generated total revenues from money transfers of
$26.8 million and $27.5 million, respectively,
primarily at our financial services stores in Canada, the United
Kingdom and the United States.
Secured Pawn Lending. We offer secured pawn
loans at most of our retail financial services locations in the
United Kingdom and at two locations in Toronto, Canada. We also
operate two traditional pawn shops in Edinburgh and Glasgow,
Scotland, and three pawn shops in London, England specializing
9
in high value gold jewelry, watches and diamonds. For fiscal
2009 and fiscal 2010, we generated total revenues from secured
pawn lending of $13.8 million and $19.9 million,
respectively.
When receiving a pawn loan from us, a customer pledges personal
property to us as security for the loan. We deliver a pawn
transaction agreement to the customer, along with the proceeds
of the loan. If the customer does not repay the loan and redeem
the property, the customer forfeits the property to us, and we
dispose of the property. We do not have recourse against the
customer for the pawn loan. We rely on the disposition of pawned
property to recover the principal amount of an unpaid pawn loan,
plus a yield on the investment. As a result, the customers
creditworthiness is not a significant factor in the loan
decision, and a decision not to redeem pawned property does not
affect the customers personal credit status. Goods pledged
to secure pawn loans are principally jewelry items, but in a few
of our stores includes tangible personal property items such as
tools, televisions and other electronics, musical instruments,
and other miscellaneous items.
We contract for a finance and service charge to compensate us
for the use of the funds loaned and to cover direct operating
expenses related to the pawn transaction. The finance and
service charge is typically calculated as a percentage of the
pawn loan amount based on the size and duration of the
transaction and generally ranges from 12% to 300% on an
annualized basis, as permitted by applicable laws.
We sell the merchandise that pawn customers forfeit when they do
not repay or renew their pawn loans. We sell most of this
merchandise at our stores offering pawn loans, but we also
dispose of some items through wholesale sources, or, in the case
of some gold jewelry, through sale to a smelter.
We also sell previously-owned merchandise primarily acquired
from customers who do not redeem their pawned goods. Our pawn
lending locations may also sell items purchased from
third-parties or directly from customers.
Money Orders. Most of our stores offer money
orders for a minimal fee. Customers who do not have checking
accounts typically use money orders to pay rent and utility
bills. During fiscal 2010, money order transactions had an
average face amount of $376.40 and an average fee of $5.35. Our
customers purchased 5.1 million money orders in fiscal 2010.
DFS
and the MILES Program
Through our MILES program, which is offered through our DFS
subsidiary acquired in December 2009, we provide fee based
services to enlisted U.S. military personnel applying for
auto loans to purchase new and late-model,
low-mileage
used vehicles that are funded and serviced under an exclusive
agreement with a major third-party national bank. Our partner
third-party national bank approves the loans, funds and
maintains the loan portfolio on its balance sheet, and bears any
risk of repayment default. We derive revenue from the fees
related to the loan application, an interest rate spread between
the rate that the third-party lender receives and the rate that
the borrower pays and fees from the auto dealers, as well as
commission fees from the sale of warranty service contracts and
GAP insurance coverage.
DFS, which is headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, and which
has been in operation since 1996, operates through an
established network of approximately 600 franchised and
independent new and used car dealerships according to
underwriting protocols specified by the major third-party bank
lender and servicer. DFS maintains relationships with this
network of car dealerships through an experienced group of local
DFS sales representatives. To be part of the DFS network,
dealerships must first be certified by DFS and agree to comply
with a number of vehicle quality and sale stipulations. In
particular, the vehicle being financed by the bank lender
through the MILES program must be less than five years old, have
fewer than 65,000 miles on the odometer and pass a
comprehensive quality inspection.
The bank lenders unique underwriting standards and the
ability to purchase service contracts and GAP insurance
policies at a discount are designed to help insulate the
borrower from events that typically lead to a loan default. GAP
insurance covers the difference between the outstanding loan
amount and the retail value of the automobile, in the event the
vehicle is classified as a total loss due to
unforeseen events such as
10
a collision, mechanical failure or theft. As part of the MILES
program, the borrower is also required to complete, at no
charge, an educational course administered by DFS covering such
topics as credit counseling, personal budgeting, and vehicle
purchase and maintenance training.
Operations
Facilities
and Hours of Operation
As part of our retail and customer-driven strategy, we seek to
present a clean, attractive and secure environment, and an
appealing format for our retail financial services stores. We
follow a strict set of market survey and location guidelines
when selecting store sites in order to ensure that our stores
are placed in desirable locations near our core customers. Size
varies by location, but our stores are generally 1,000 to
1,400 square feet, with approximately half of that space
allocated to the customer service representative and back office
areas. Operating hours vary by location, but are typically
extended and designed to cater to those customers who, due to
work schedules, cannot make use of normal banking
hours. In certain locations, we operate stores, seven days per
week and twenty-four hours a day.
Structure
Our senior management resides at our corporate headquarters in
Berwyn, Pennsylvania, and is responsible for our overall
strategic direction. This corporate staff includes our global
executive management, global strategy, business development and
acquisitions, corporate finance, investor relations, global
compensation and benefits, global credit and legal functions, as
well as compliance functions, including internal audit, risk
management, and privacy. We also maintain administrative offices
in Victoria, British Columbia, Toronto, Ontario, Nottingham,
England and Gdansk, Poland. We maintain separate management and
store support operations and other centralized functions such as
information systems, treasury, accounting, human resources, loss
prevention and marketing for each of the countries in which we
operate.
We maintain in each country in which we operate a network of
stores, a store-management organization that is responsible for
the
day-to-day
operations of the stores in that country. District managers are
directly responsible for the oversight of our store managers and
store operations. Typically, each district manager oversees
eight to ten stores. Each district manager reports to a market
manager who typically supervises approximately five district
managers. The market managers report to the head of operations
in each of our divisional corporate offices.
We have centralized facilities in Canada, the United Kingdom,
Poland and the United States to support our consumer lending
activities in each of those countries. Our staff at each of
these locations performs inbound and outbound customer service
for current and prospective consumer loan customers, including
collections for past-due consumer loans. Our management at these
facilities includes experienced call-center operations, customer
service, information technology and collections personnel. We
believe that these centralized facilities have helped us both to
improve our loan servicing significantly and to reduce credit
losses on loans originated by us, and significantly enhances our
ability to manage the compliance responsibilities related to our
consumer lending operations in the markets in which we operate.
We believe that our ongoing investment in, and organization-wide
focus on, our compliance practices provides us with a
competitive advantage relative to many other companies in our
industry.
Technology
We maintain an enterprise-wide transaction processing computer
network. We believe that this system improves our customer
service by reducing transaction time and allows us both to
manage our loan-collection efforts and returned-check losses
better and to comply with regulatory recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
We continue to enhance our
point-of-sale
transaction processing systems, which are composed of a
networked hardware and software package with integrated database
and reporting capabilities. Our
point-of-sale
systems provide our stores with instantaneous customer
information, thereby reducing transaction
11
time and improving the efficiency of our credit-verification and
check cashing processes. We also utilize an enhanced centralized
loan-management and collection system that provides improved
customer service processing and management of loan transactions.
The loan-management system and collection system uses integrated
automated clearinghouse payment and returns processing, which
facilitates faster notification of returns and faster clearing
of funds as well as utilizing fax server document-processing
technology to reduce both processing and loan-closing times. Our
point-of-sale
systems, together with the loan-management and collection
systems, have enhanced our ability to offer new products and
services and overall customer service.
Security
Robbery and employee theft are significant operational risks
that we face. We have sought to deploy extensive security and
surveillance systems, dedicated loss prevention and security
personnel and management information systems throughout our
operations to address areas of potential risk. We believe that
our systems are among the most effective in our industry.
Accordingly, net security losses represented 0.5% and 0.3% of
total revenues for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, respectively.
To protect against robbery, most store employees work behind
bullet-resistant glass and steel partitions, with back office,
safe and computer areas locked and closed to customers. Security
measures in each of our stores include safes, electronic alarm
systems monitored by third parties, control over entry to teller
areas, detection of entry through perimeter openings, walls, and
ceilings and tracking of all employee movement in and out of
secured areas. Employees use devices to ensure safety and
security whenever they are outside the secure teller area.
Additional security measures include sophisticated alarm
systems, remote control over alarm systems, arming/disarming and
changing user codes and mechanically and electronically
controlled time-delay safes. Because we handle high volumes of
cash and negotiable instruments at our locations, daily
monitoring, an internal auditing program including periodic
unannounced store audits and cash counts at randomly selected
locations, and immediate responses to irregularities are
critical in combating defalcations.
Advertising
and Marketing
We employ a variety of media to advertise the products and
services that we offer in our financial services stores,
including point of purchase and in-store promotions, mass media
including television and radio advertisements, electronic media
including text messaging,
e-mail
campaigns, search engine marketing and web site marketing, and
community activities, which we believe allows us to become a
trusted part of the community with locally designed and executed
programs like charity fundraisers and sponsorship of community
events. The nature and type of advertising employed differs by
geographical market and the products we are seeking to
emphasize. Our in-store transaction database allows us to
develop direct marketing strategies to communicate to existing
customers and prospective customers who have similar demographic
characteristics. We actively measure and conduct testing of our
advertising programs to ensure we achieve a positive return on
investment.
Proprietary
Rights
We hold the rights to a variety of service marks relating to the
financial services that we provide in our financial services
stores and in our other businesses. In addition, we maintain
service marks relating to the various names under which our
stores operate. Our registered trademarks include Money
Mart®,
Money
Shop®,
Loan
Mart®,
Money
Corner®,
Money
MartExpress®,
Insta-Cheques®,
Check
Mart®,
The Check Cashing
Store®,
Cash Til
Payday®,
CustomCash®,
Momentum®,
Qwicash®,
Payday
Express®,
Cheque In Cash
Out®,
Real People. Fast
Cash®,
EasyTax®,
Zap-It®,
Fast Cash
Advance®,
Advance
Canada®,
CC®,
iii
optima®,
mce®,
and
MILES®.
Insurance
Coverage
We maintain insurance coverage against losses, including theft,
to protect our assets and properties. We also maintain insurance
coverage against criminal acts with a deductible of $50,000 per
occurrence in the United States and the United Kingdom and CAD
25,000 per occurrence in Canada.
12
Franchises
As of June 30, 2010, we had 62 franchise locations in
Canada and 53 in the United Kingdom. These franchised locations
are subject to franchise agreements with us that have varying
durations and have been negotiated individually with each
franchisee. We are not, however, actively marketing franchises
in any of our markets.
Employees
As of June 30, 2010, we employed approximately
4,966 persons worldwide, consisting of 593 persons in
our accounting, management information systems, legal, human
resources, treasury, finance and administrative departments, and
4,373 persons in our stores and other operational
functions, including customer service representatives, store
managers, regional supervisors, operations directors and store
administrative personnel. None of our employees are represented
by a labor union, and we believe that our relations with our
employees are good.
Seasonality
Our business is seasonal primarily due to the impact of several
tax-related services, including cashing tax refund checks,
making electronic tax filings and processing applications of
refund anticipation loans. Historically, we have generally
experienced our highest revenues and earnings during our third
fiscal quarter ending March 31, when revenues from these
tax-related services peak. Due to the seasonality of our
business, results of operations for any fiscal quarter are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be
achieved for the full fiscal year. In addition, quarterly
results of operations depend significantly upon the timing and
amount of revenues and expenses associated with the addition of
new stores.
Competition
We face significant competition in each of the countries in
which we operate, and for each of the services and products that
we offer in those countries. Our industry includes companies
that offer automated check cashing machines and franchised kiosk
units that provide check cashing and money order services to
customers, which can be located in places such as convenience
stores, bank lobbies, grocery stores, discount retailers and
shopping malls. We believe that, ultimately, convenience, hours
of operations, accessibility and other aspects of customer
service are the principal factors influencing customers
selection of a financial services company in our industry, and
that the pricing of products and services is a secondary
consideration.
Because we operate primarily in three countries, Canada, the
United Kingdom and the United States, and intend to enter into
additional markets, we face different competitive conditions
across our operations. Competition is driven in part by the
demographics of the potential customer base in each market, laws
and regulations affecting the products and services we offer in
a particular country or regional jurisdiction, platforms from
which services are provided, and socio-economic factors present
in each market.
The finalization of new provincial regulations in Canada for
single-payment short-term consumer loans has caused certain
existing competitors to expand their operations, in particular
encouraging some
U.S.-based
competitors to begin to enter the Canadian market.
Notwithstanding this increased competition, we believe that the
new regulations adopted by a majority of the Canadian provinces
in which we do business, including Ontario, British Columbia and
Alberta, present an opportunity to leverage our multi-product
platform and to improve our share of the Canadian market by
continuing to offer the lowest product pricing as compared to
our competitors. Furthermore, we believe that many of the less
efficient mono-line operators in Canada will likely struggle
under the new more restrictive provincial regulations,
presenting a potential opportunity for us to purchase their
stores or customer accounts at attractive prices.
Recent research indicates that the U.K. market for small,
short-term single-payment loans is served by approximately 1,200
store locations, which include check cashers, pawn brokers and
home-collected credit companies, in addition to approximately 20
on-line lenders.
13
In the United States, our industry is highly fragmented.
According to Financial Service Centers of America, Inc., there
are approximately 7,000 neighborhood check cashing stores and,
according to published equity research estimates by Stephens
Inc., there are approximately 22,000 short-term lending stores.
There are several public companies in the United States with
large networks of stores offering single-payment consumer loans,
as well as several large pawn shop chains offering such loans in
their store networks in the United States. Like check cashing,
there are also many local chains and
single-unit
operators offering single-payment consumer loans as their
principal business product.
In addition to other check cashing stores and consumer lending
stores and financial services platforms in each of the countries
in which we operate, our competitors include banks and other
financial services entities, as well as retail businesses, such
as grocery and liquor stores, which often cash checks for their
customers. Some competitors, primarily grocery stores, do not
charge a fee to cash a check. However, these merchants generally
provide this service to certain customers with solid credit
ratings or for checks issued by highly recognized companies, or
those written on the customers account and made payable to
the store.
Regulation
We are subject to regulation by foreign, federal and state
governments that affects the products and services we provide.
In general, this regulation is designed to protect consumers who
deal with us and not to protect the holders of our securities,
including our common stock. In particular, we are subject to the
regulations described below as well as regulations governing
currency reporting, privacy and other matters described
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including under Item 1A Risk
Factors.
Consumer
Lending
Prior to 2007, our consumer lending activities in Canada were
subject to a federal usury ceiling and provincial licensing in
Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland.
Effective May 3, 2007, the Canadian Parliament amended the
federal usury law to permit each province to assume jurisdiction
over, and the development of, laws and regulations of short-term
consumer loan products such as ours. To date, the provinces of
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and
Nova Scotia have passed legislation regulating short-term
consumer lenders and each has, or is in the process of adopting,
regulations and rates consistent with those laws. In general,
the regulations proposed and implemented to date are similar to
those in effect in the United States which require lenders to be
licensed, set maximum limits on the charges to the consumer for
a loan and regulate collection practices. We believe that the
short-term consumer loan products that we currently offer in
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and
Nova Scotia conform with the applicable regulations of such
provinces. We do not offer short-term consumer loans in Quebec.
In the United Kingdom, consumer lending is governed by the
Consumer Credit Act of 1974, and related rules and regulations.
As required by the Consumer Credit Act of 1974, we have obtained
licenses from the Office of Fair Trading, which is responsible
for regulating competition, policy, and for consumer protection.
The Consumer Credit Act of 1974 also contains rules regarding
the presentation, form and content of loan agreements, including
statutory warnings and the layout of financial information.
Beginning July 31, 2009, The Money Laundering Regulations
2007 were enhanced to include consumer credit lenders, and all
consumer credit lenders not authorized by the Financial Services
Authority or HM Revenue and Customs as a Money Service Business
are now required to register with the Office of Fair Trading. We
believe we have complied with these regulations where we were
not already registered by HM Revenue and Customs.
Short-term consumer loan products are subject to a variety of
regulations at the federal, state and local levels in the United
States. Currently, short-term consumer loan products are
primarily regulated at the state level. Several states prohibit
certain short-term consumer loan products and, as a result, we
only offer check cashing and other non-loan products in those
states. In other states in which operate, applicable laws and
regulations typically limit the principal amount that we may
offer and the maximum fees that we may charge on our short-term
consumer loans. Some states also limit a customers ability
to renew an advance and otherwise require certain consumer
disclosures. These regulations in many cases also specify
minimum and
14
maximum maturity dates and, in some case, impose mandatory
cooling off periods between transactions. We believe
that our short-term consumer loan products are in compliance
with the applicable laws and regulations of the states in which
we offer such products.
At the federal level, the
Truth-in-Lending
Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and the regulations promulgated pursuant
to each, impact our short-term loan products. Among other
things, these laws and regulations require disclosure of the
principal terms of each transaction to every customer, including
the dollar amount of finance charges and the applicable imputed
annual percentage rate, prohibit false or misleading
advertising, prohibit discriminatory lending practices and
prohibit unfair credit practices.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama in the United States
signed into law the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010
which, among other things, creates a federal Bureau of Consumer
Protection which will have regulatory jurisdiction over large
non-depository financial companies, including us. Under this
law, the Bureau of Consumer Protection has broad authority to
prescribe regulations over what it determines to be unfair,
deceptive or abusive practices, including the ability to curtail
or make unlawful any products falling within its regulatory
authority. We cannot predict what, if any, action the Bureau of
Consumer Protection might take with respect to short-term
consumer loans.
Short-term consumer loans have also been the subject of several
other proposed bills in the U.S. House and Senate that
would impose limits on the interest and fees on such products.
To date, none of these bills have moved past committee review.
In addition to state and federal laws and regulations, we are
also subject to various local rules and regulations such as
local zoning regulations and licensing requirements. These local
rules and regulations are subject to change and vary by location.
Check
Cashing
In Canada, the federal government generally does not regulate
check cashing activities, nor do the provincial governments
generally impose any regulations specific to the check cashing
industry. The exceptions are the provinces of Québec and
Saskatchewan, where check cashing stores are not permitted to
charge a fee to cash government checks, and Manitoba, where the
province imposes a maximum fee to cash government checks.
In the United Kingdom, as a result of the Cheques Act of 1992,
banks must refund the fraudulent or dishonest checks that they
clear to the maker. For this reason, banks have invoked more
stringent credit inspection and indemnity criteria for
businesses such as ours. Additionally, in 2003, the Money
Laundering Regulations of 1993 were enhanced, requiring check
cashing, money transfer and foreign currency exchange providers
to be licensed, and in 2007, they were further enhanced to
require background checks of persons running such businesses as
a requirement of granting a license. We believe that we
currently comply with these rules and regulations.
To date, regulation of check cashing fees in the United States
has occurred on the state level. We are currently subject to fee
regulation in seven states in which we operate: Arizona,
California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida,
where regulations set maximum fees for cashing various types of
checks. Our check cashing fees comply with applicable state
regulations. Some states, including California, Ohio,
Pennsylvania and Washington, have enacted licensing requirements
for check cashing stores. Other states, including Ohio, require
the conspicuous posting of the fees charged by each store. A
number of states, including Ohio, have also imposed
recordkeeping requirements, while other states require check
cashing stores to file fee schedules with state regulators.
Currency
Reporting
The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada
is responsible for ensuring that money services businesses
comply with the legislative requirements of the Proceeds of
Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act. The
Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act
requires
15
the reporting of large cash transactions involving amounts of
$10,000 or more received in cash and international electronic
funds transfer requests of $10,000 or more. This act also
requires submitting suspicious transactions reports where there
are reasonable grounds to suspect that a transaction is related
to the commission of a money laundering offense or to the
financing of a terrorist activity. We believe that we are in
compliance with the requirements of the Proceeds of Crime (Money
Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act.
The Terrorism Act of 2000 and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
expanded, reformed and consolidated the United Kingdoms
criminal money laundering offenses. The Money Laundering
Regulations of 2003 impose certain reporting and record keeping
requirements on persons and businesses in the regulated sector.
Her Majestys Revenue and Customs has the responsibility
for enforcing the regulations. The regulations require that
identity is taken for any person carrying out single or multiple
foreign exchange transactions exceeding the GBP equivalent of
EUR 15,000 and for the cashing of any third-party check, in
any amount. Additionally, regulations require the submission of
suspicious transaction reports to the Serious Organized Crime
Agency whenever there is a transaction which is inconsistent
with a customers known legitimate business activities or
with normal business for that type of account. We have existing
procedures to remain in compliance with these requirements and
believe that we are in compliance with these regulatory
requirements.
Regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department
under the Bank Secrecy Act require reporting of transactions
involving currency in an amount greater than $10,000, and
maintenance of records regarding the purchase of money orders
and wire transfers for cash in amounts from $3,000 to $10,000.
In general, every financial institution must report each
deposit, withdrawal, exchange of currency or other payment or
transfer that involves currency in an amount greater than
$10,000. In addition, multiple currency transactions must be
treated as a single transaction if the financial institution has
knowledge that the transactions are by, or on behalf of, any one
person and result in either cash in or cash out totaling more
than $10,000 during any one business day. We believe that our
point-of-sale
system and employee training programs support our compliance
with these regulatory requirements.
Also, money services businesses are required by the Money
Laundering Suppression Act of 1994 to register with the
U.S. Treasury Department. Money services businesses include
check cashers and sellers of money orders. Money services
businesses must renew their registrations every two years,
maintain a list of their agents, update the agent list annually
and make the agent list available for examination. In addition,
the Bank Secrecy Act requires money services businesses to file
a Suspicious Activity Report for any transaction conducted or
attempted involving amounts individually or in total equaling
$2,000 or greater, when the money services businesses knows or
suspects that the transaction involves funds derived from an
illegal activity, the transaction is designed to evade the
requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act or the transaction is
considered so unusual that there appears to be no reasonable
explanation for the transaction. The Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the PATRIOT Act, includes a
number of anti-money-laundering measures designed to assist in
the identification and seizure of terrorist funds, including
provisions that directly impact check cashers and other money
services businesses. Specifically, the PATRIOT Act requires all
check cashers to establish certain programs designed to detect
and report money laundering activities to law enforcement. We
believe we are in compliance with the PATRIOT Act. The
U.S. Treasury Departments Office of Foreign Assets
Control administers economic sanctions and embargo programs that
require assets and transactions involving target countries and
their nationals (referred to as specially designated
nationals and blocked persons) be frozen. We maintain
procedures to assure compliance with these requirements.
Privacy
of Personal Information
We are subject to a variety of state, federal and foreign laws
and regulations restricting the use and seeking to protect the
confidentiality of identifying and other personal consumer
information. We believe that the procedures and systems that we
maintain safeguard such information as required.
16
Corporate
Information
Dollar Financial Corp. is a Delaware corporation formed in 1990.
We operate our store networks through our direct and indirect
wholly-owned foreign and domestic subsidiaries. Our principal
executive offices are located at 1436 Lancaster Avenue, Berwyn,
Pennsylvania 19312, and our telephone number is
(610) 296-3400.
Available
Information
We file annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K
and other information with the SEC. Members of the public may
read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Members of the public may
also obtain information on the Public Reference Room by calling
the SEC at
1-800-732-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with
the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov. Our annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K
and other information filed by us with the SEC are available,
without charge, on our Internet web site, www.dfg.com as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with
the SEC.
Our current business and future results may be affected by a
number of risks and uncertainties, including those described
below. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the
only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any
of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could suffer. The risks
discussed below also include forward-looking statements and our
actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in
these forward-looking statements.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
If we
do not generate a sufficient amount of cash from operations,
which depends on many factors beyond our control, we may not be
able to satisfy our debt service or other liquidity
requirements.
As of June 30, 2010, we had an aggregate of
$728.6 million in outstanding indebtedness. If our cash
flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt
service obligations and to satisfy our working capital and other
liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital
expenditures, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or
refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not
be successful or may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt
service obligations. In the absence of such operating results
and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and
might be required to sell material assets or operations to
attempt to meet our debt service and other obligations. If we
are unable to make the required payments on our debt
obligations, we would be in default under the terms of our
indebtedness which could result in an acceleration of our
repayment obligations. Any such default, or any attempt to alter
our business plans and operations to satisfy our obligations
under our indebtedness, could materially adversely affect our
business, prospects, results of operations and financial
condition.
Changes
in applicable laws and regulations governing our business may
have a significant negative impact on our results of operations
and financial condition.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, local and
foreign laws, ordinances and regulations in each of the
countries in which we operate which are subject to change and
which may impose significant costs or limitations on the way we
conduct or expand our business. These regulations govern or
affect, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
lending practices, such as truth in lending and installment and
single-payment lending;
|
|
|
|
interest rates and usury;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
loan amount and fee limitations;
|
|
|
|
check cashing fees;
|
|
|
|
licensing and posting of fees;
|
|
|
|
currency reporting;
|
|
|
|
privacy of personal consumer information;
|
|
|
|
prompt remittance of proceeds for the sale of money
orders; and
|
|
|
|
the location of our stores through various rules and regulations
such as local zoning regulations and requirements for special
use permits.
|
As we develop and introduce new products and services, we may
become subject to additional laws and regulations. Future
legislation or regulations may restrict our ability to continue
our current methods of operation or expand our operations and
may have a negative effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Governments at the national
and local levels may seek to impose new licensing requirements
or interpret or enforce existing requirements in new ways. We
and other participants in our industry are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to litigation and regulatory proceedings
which could generate adverse publicity or cause us to incur
substantial expenditures or modify the way we conduct our
business. Changes in laws or regulations, or our failure to
comply with applicable laws and regulations, may have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of
operations, and financial condition.
Our consumer lending products in particular are subject to
regulations in each of the markets in which we operate that
significantly impact the manner in which we conduct our
business. In Canada, the Canadian Parliament amended the federal
usury law in 2007 to permit each province to assume jurisdiction
over and the development of laws and regulations regarding our
industry. To date, Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba,
Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia have passed legislation regulating
short-term consumer lenders and each has, or is in the process
of adopting, regulations and rates consistent with those laws.
In general, these regulations require lenders to be licensed,
set maximum fees and regulate collection practices. There can be
no assurance that these regulations will not have a detrimental
effect on our consumer lending business in Canada in the future.
In the United Kingdom, our consumer lending activities must
comply with the Consumer Credit Act of 1974 and related rules
and regulations which, among other things, require us to obtain
governmental licenses and prescribe the presentation, form and
content of loan agreements, including statutory warnings and the
layout of financial information. Our non-compliance with these
rules could render a loan agreement unenforceable.
Short-term consumer loans have come under heightened regulatory
scrutiny in the United States in recent years resulting in
increasingly restrictive regulations and legislation at the
state and federal levels that makes offering such loans less
profitable or attractive to us. Regulations adopted by some
states require that all borrowers of certain short-term loan
products be listed on a database and limit the number of such
loans that a borrower may have outstanding. Legislative or
regulatory activities may also limit the amount of interest and
fees to levels that do not permit the offering of cash advance
loans to be feasible, may limit the number of short-term loans
that customers may receive or have outstanding, or may prohibit
entirely short-term loan products. Additionally, the
U.S. Congress continues to receive significant pressure
from consumer advocates and other industry opposition groups to
adopt such legislation at the federal level. In July 2010,
President Obama in the United States signed into law the
Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 which, among other
things, creates a federal Bureau of Consumer Protection which
will have regulatory jurisdiction over large non-depository
financial companies, including us. Under this law, the Bureau of
Consumer Protection has broad authority to prescribe regulations
over what it determines to be unfair, deceptive or abusive
practices, including the ability to curtail or make unlawful any
products falling within its regulatory authority. We cannot
predict what, if any, action the Bureau of Consumer Protection
may take with respect to short-term consumer loans, and any such
actions could have an adverse impact on our business, prospects,
results of operations and financial condition.
18
The modification of existing laws or regulations in any of the
jurisdictions in which we operate or in which we contemplate new
operations, or the adoption of new laws or regulations
restricting or imposing more stringent requirements, on our
consumer lending or check cashing activities in particular,
could increase our operating expenses, significantly limit our
business activities in the effected markets limit our expansion
opportunities
and/or could
result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, and financial condition.
We
have engaged, and may engage in the future, in acquisitions or
investments which present many risks, and we may not realize the
anticipated financial and strategic goals for any of these
transactions.
We have historically grown our business through strategic
acquisitions, and a key component of our growth strategy is to
continue to pursue acquisition opportunities. We may not,
however, be able to achieve the anticipated benefits from the
acquisition or investment due to a number of factors. The
success of our acquisitions is dependent, in part, upon our
effectively integrating the management, operations and
technology of acquired businesses into our existing management,
operations and technology platforms, of which there can be no
assurance, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or
multiple acquisitions completed in a short period of time. The
failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses into our
organization could materially adversely affect our business,
prospects, results of operations and financial condition. From
time to time, we may enter into negotiations for acquisitions or
investments that are not ultimately consummated. These
negotiations could result in a significant diversion of our
managements time, as well as
out-of-pocket
costs.
The consideration paid for an acquisition or investment may also
affect our financial results. If we were to proceed with one or
more significant acquisitions in which the consideration
included cash, we could be required to use a substantial portion
of our available cash or to obtain debt or equity financing. To
the extent that we issue shares of our capital stock or other
rights to purchase shares of our capital stock as consideration
for an acquisition or in connection with the financing of an
acquisition, including options or other rights, our existing
stockholders may be diluted, and our earnings per share may
decrease. In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence
of debt, large one-time write-offs, including write-offs of
acquired in-process research and development costs, and
restructuring charges. Acquisitions may require us to incur
additional indebtedness to finance our working capital and may
also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are
subject to impairment tests, which could result in future
impairment charges.
Adverse
economic conditions may significantly and adversely affect our
business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition
and access to liquidity.
The ongoing current global economic downturn may adversely
affect our business in several ways. For example, continued high
levels of unemployment in the markets in which we operate will
likely reduce the number of customers who qualify for our
products and services, which in turn may reduce our revenues.
Similarly, reduced consumer confidence and spending may decrease
the demand for our products. Also, we are unable to predict how
the widespread loss of jobs, housing foreclosures, and general
economic uncertainty may affect our loss experience.
If internal funds are not available from our operations and
after utilizing our excess cash, we may be required to rely on
the banking and credit markets to meet our financial commitments
and short-term liquidity needs. Disruptions in the capital and
credit markets, as have been experienced since 2008, could
adversely affect our ability to draw on our revolving loans. Our
access to funds under our credit facility is dependent on the
ability of the banks that are parties to the facility to meet
their funding commitments. Those banks may not be able to meet
their funding commitments to us if they experience shortages of
capital and liquidity or if they experience excessive volumes of
borrowing requests from us and other borrowers within a short
period of time.
Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a
result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation, reduced
alternatives, or failures of significant financial institutions
could adversely affect our ability to refinance our outstanding
indebtedness on favorable terms, if at all. The lack of
availability under, and the inability to subsequently refinance,
our indebtedness could require us to take measures to conserve
cash until
19
the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements
or other funding for our business needs can be arranged. Such
measures could include deferring capital expenditures, including
acquisitions, and reducing or eliminating other discretionary
uses of cash.
Public
perception and press coverage of single-payment consumer loans
as being predatory or abusive could negatively affect our
revenues and results of operations.
Consumer advocacy groups, certain media reports, and a number of
regulators and elected officials in the several jurisdictions in
which we conduct business have from time to time advocated
governmental action to prohibit or severely restrict certain
types of short-term consumer lending. These efforts have often
focused on lenders that charge consumers imputed interest rates
and fees that are higher than those charged by credit card
issuers to more creditworthy consumers and otherwise
characterize our products and services as being predatory or
abusive toward consumers. This difference in credit cost may
become more pronounced if a consumer does not repay a loan
promptly, instead electing to renew the loan for one or more
additional short-term periods. If consumers accept this negative
characterization of certain single-payment consumer loans and
believe that the loans we provide to our customers fit this
characterization, demand for our loans could significantly
decrease. In addition, media coverage and public statements that
assert some form of corporate wrongdoing can lower morale, make
it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
employees, management and directors, divert management attention
and increase expenses. These trends could materially adversely
affect our business, prospects, results of operations and
financial condition.
If our
estimates of loan losses are not adequate to absorb losses, our
results of operations and financial condition may be adversely
affected.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses for anticipated losses
on company-funded loans and loans in default. To estimate the
appropriate level of loan loss reserves, we consider known and
relevant internal and external factors that affect loan
collectability, including the amount of outstanding loans owed
to us, historical loans charged off, current collection patterns
and current economic trends. Our current allowance for loan
losses is based on our charge-offs, expressed as a percentage of
loan amounts originated for the last twelve months applied
against the principal balance of outstanding loans. As of
June 30, 2010, our allowance for loan losses on
company-funded consumer loans that were not in default was
$16.8 million and our allowance for losses on loans in
default was $14.4 million. These reserves, however, are
estimates, and if actual loan losses are materially greater than
our loan loss reserves, our results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
Legal
proceedings may have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations or cash flows in future periods.
We are currently subject to several legal proceedings. We are
vigorously defending these proceedings. In addition, we are
likely to be subject to additional legal proceedings in the
future. The resolution of any current or future legal proceeding
could cause us to have to refund fees
and/or
interest collected, refund the principal amount of advances, pay
damages or other monetary penalties
and/or
modify or terminate our operations in particular local and
federal jurisdictions. We may also be subject to adverse
publicity. Defense of any legal proceedings, even if successful,
requires substantial time and attention of our senior officers
and other management personnel that would otherwise be spent on
other aspects of our business and requires the expenditure of
significant amounts for legal fees and other related costs.
Settlement of lawsuits may also result in significant payments
and modifications to our operations. Any of these events could
have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
results of operations and financial condition.
Competition
in the financial services industry could cause us to lose market
share and revenues.
The industry in which we operate is highly fragmented and very
competitive, and we believe that the market may become more
competitive as the industry consolidates. In addition to other
consumer lending and check cashing stores in the markets in
which we operate, we compete with banks and other financial
services entities and retail businesses that offer consumer
loans, cash checks, sell money orders, provide money transfer
20
services or offer other products and services offered by us.
Some of our competitors have larger and more established
customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing
and other resources than we have. As a result, we could lose
market share and our revenues could decline, thereby affecting
our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to service our
indebtedness and fund our operations.
Foreign
currency fluctuations and unexpected changes in foreign tax
rates may adversely affect our reported results of
operations.
We currently generate a majority of our revenue outside the
United States. Our foreign subsidiaries accounted for 70.7% and
76.6% of our total revenues for the years ended June 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively. As a result, our reported results
of operations are vulnerable to currency exchange rate
fluctuations, principally in the Canadian dollar and the British
pound against the United States dollar. Upon consolidation, as
exchange rates vary, net sales and other operating results may
differ materially from expectations, and we may record
significant gains or losses on the remeasurement of intercompany
balances. We estimate that a 10.0% change in foreign exchange
rates by itself would have impacted reported pre-tax earnings
from continuing operations (exclusive of losses on
extinguishment of debt of $8.4 million, unrealized foreign
exchange losses of $10.2 million, losses on derivatives not
designated as hedges of $12.9 million, litigation expense
of $22.6 million and losses on store closings of
$0.9 million) by approximately $9.2 million for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and $9.7 million
(exclusive of the unrealized foreign exchange gain of
$5.5 million, litigation expense of $57.5 million and
losses on store closings of $3.2 million) for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2009. This impact represents 11.3% of
our consolidated foreign pre-tax earnings for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2010 and 13.7% of our consolidated foreign
pre-tax earnings for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009.
The
international scope of our operations may contribute to
increased costs that could negatively impact our
operations.
Since international operations increase the complexity of an
organization, we may face additional administrative costs in
managing our business than we would if we only conducted
operations domestically. In addition, most countries typically
impose additional burdens on non-domestic companies through the
use of local regulations, tariffs and labor controls. Unexpected
changes to the foregoing could negatively impact our operations.
Furthermore, our financial results may be negatively impacted to
the extent tax rates in foreign countries where we operate
increase
and/or
exceed those in the United States and as a result of the
imposition of withholding requirements on foreign earnings.
A
reduction in demand for our products and services, and failure
by us to adapt to such potential reduction, could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
The demand for a particular product or service we offer may be
reduced due to a variety of factors, such as regulatory
restrictions that decrease customer access to particular
products, the availability of competing products, changes in
customers preferences or financial conditions.
Furthermore, any changes in economic factors that adversely
affect consumer transactions and employment could reduce the
volume or type of transactions that we process and have an
adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. Should
we fail to adapt to significant changes in our customers
demand for, or access to, our products or services, our revenues
could decrease significantly and our operations could be harmed.
Each modification, new product or service, and alternative
method of conducting business is subject to risk and uncertainty
and requires significant investment in time and capital,
including additional marketing expenses, legal costs, and other
incremental
start-up
costs. Even if we do make changes to existing products or
services or introduce new products or services to fulfill
customer demand, customers may resist or may reject such
products or services. The effect of any product change on the
results of our business may not be fully ascertainable until the
change has been in effect for some time and by that time it may
be too late to make further modifications to such product or
service without causing further harm to our business and results
of operations.
21
Our
check cashing services may further diminish because of
technological advances.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from fees
associated with cashing payroll, government and personal checks.
In fiscal 2010, we generated approximately 24.5% of our total
consolidated revenues from fees associated with check cashing.
Recently, there has been increasing penetration of electronic
banking services into the check cashing and money transfer
industry, including direct deposit of payroll checks and
electronic transfer of government benefits. To the extent that
checks received by our customer base are replaced with such
electronic transfers, demand for our check cashing services
could decrease.
Our
business and results of operations may be adversely affected if
we are unable to manage our growth effectively.
Our expansion strategy, which in part contemplates the addition
of new stores, the acquisition of competitor stores and
acquiring or developing new distribution channels for our
products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the
Republic of Ireland, Poland and other international markets, is
subject to significant risks. Our continued growth in this
manner is dependent upon a number of factors, including the
ability to hire, train and retain an adequate number of
experienced management employees, the availability of adequate
financing for our expansion activities, the ability to
successfully transition acquired stores or their historical
customer base to our operating platform, the ability to obtain
any government permits and licenses that may be required, the
ability to identify and overcome cultural and linguistic
differences which may impact market practices within a given
geographic region, and other factors, some of which are beyond
our control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
successfully grow our business or that our current business,
results of operations and financial condition will not suffer if
we are unable to do so. Expansion beyond the geographic areas
where the stores are presently located will increase demands on
management and divert their attention. In addition, expansion
into new products and services will present new challenges to
our business and will require additional management time.
Our
ability to open and acquire new stores is subject to outside
factors and circumstances over which we have limited control or
that are beyond our control which could adversely affect our
growth potential.
Our expansion strategy includes acquiring existing retail
financial services stores and opening new ones. The success of
this strategy is subject to numerous outside factors, such as
the availability of attractive acquisition candidates, the
availability of acceptable business locations, the ability to
access capital to acquire and open such stores, the ability to
obtain required permits and licenses and continuing favorable
legal and regulatory conditions. We have limited control, and in
some cases, no control, over these factors. Moreover, the
start-up
costs and the losses we likely would incur from initial
operations attributable to each newly opened store places
demands upon our liquidity and cash flow, and we cannot assure
you that we will be able to satisfy these demands. The failure
to execute our expansion strategy would adversely affect our
ability to expand our business and could materially adversely
affect our revenue, profitability and results of operations and
our ability to service our indebtedness.
Our
MILES program relies upon exclusive and non-exclusive
contractual relationships with its service providers, the loss
of any of which could adversely affect the performance of the
MILES business and our results of operations
generally.
Our MILES program, which is offered by our recently acquired DFS
subsidiary, provides fee-based services to junior enlisted
military personnel applying for automobile loans. The MILES
program generates its operating revenue from fees paid by a
major third-party national bank funding the loans, fees from
auto dealers and fees from the sale of ancillary products such
as warranty service contracts and GAP insurance coverage. We
rely upon exclusive contractual relationships with the
third-party national bank for the funding and servicing of auto
loans made in connection with the MILES program, and
non-exclusive arrangement with other providers for warranty
service contracts and GAP insurance contracts. However, if any
or all of these contractual relationships were terminated, or if
events were to occur which resulted in a material reduction in
the services provided, a material increase in the cost of the
services provided or a material reduction in the fees earned by
it for the services provided under these contractual
relationships, we could be required to locate
22
new or alternate service providers for our MILES program. In
such event, and until we would be able to locate new or
alternate service providers, our MILES program business could be
significantly disrupted. In addition, such new or alternate
service providers may offer services that are more costly to
MILES customers or that pay premiums or fees below the
level that we currently receive. These changes could have a
material adverse effect on our business and negatively affect
our revenues and results of operations.
Unites
States defense budget cuts that reduce enlistments or the number
of active duty military personnel could harm our MILES program
business.
The number of enlisted active duty military personnel and the
number of recruits joining the military each year are subject to
the U.S. defense budget. Cuts in the U.S. defense
budget may result in reductions in recruitment targets,
reductions in the number of active duty military personnel or
both, any of which would reduce the overall number of potential
MILES program customers or potentially reduce demand for the
services offered by us through our MILES program which would
cause our revenue to decline and could otherwise harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
business is seasonal in nature, which causes our revenues and
earnings to fluctuate.
Our business is seasonal due to the impact of several
tax-related services, including cashing tax refund checks and
making electronic tax filings. Historically, we have generally
experienced our highest revenues and earnings during the third
fiscal quarter ending March 31, when revenues from these
tax-related services peak. This seasonality requires us to
manage our cash flows over the course of the year. If our
revenues were to fall substantially below what we would normally
expect during certain periods, our financial results could be
adversely impacted.
Because
we maintain a significant supply of cash in our stores, we may
be subject to cash shortages due to robbery, employee error and
theft.
Since our business requires us to maintain a significant supply
of cash in each of our retail financial services stores, we are
subject to the risk of cash shortages resulting from robberies,
as well as employee errors and theft. Although we have
implemented various programs to reduce these risks, maintain
insurance coverage for theft and provide security, systems and
processes for our employees and facilities, we cannot assure you
that robberies, employee error and theft will not occur and lead
to cash shortages that could adversely affect our results of
operations.
If we
lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the
talent required for our business, our operating results could
suffer.
Our future success depends to a significant degree upon the
members of our executive management team, which have been
instrumental in procuring capital to assist us in executing our
growth strategies, identifying and negotiating domestic and
international acquisitions, and providing expertise in managing
our developing international operations. The loss of the
services of one or more members of our executive management team
could harm our business and future development. Our continued
growth also will depend upon our ability to attract and retain
additional skilled management personnel. If we are unable to
attract and retain the requisite personnel as needed in the
future, our operating results and growth could suffer.
A
catastrophic event or security breach at our corporate or
international headquarters or our centralized call-center
facilities in Canada, the United Kingdom or the United States
could significantly disrupt our operations and adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our global business management processes are primarily provided
from our corporate headquarters in Berwyn, Pennsylvania, and our
operations headquarters in Victoria, British Columbia, and
Nottingham, England. We also maintain centralized call-center
facilities in each of these locations as well as in Salt Lake
City, Utah, that perform customer service, collection and
loan-servicing functions for our consumer lending business. We
have in place disaster recovery plans for each of these sites,
including data redundancy and remote information
23
back-up
systems, but if any of these locations were severely damaged by
a catastrophic event, such as a flood, significant power outage
or act of terror, our operations could be significantly
disrupted and our business, results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely impacted.
A security breach of our computer systems could also interrupt
or damage our operations or harm our reputation, and could
subject to us to significant liability if confidential customer
information is misappropriated from our computer systems.
Despite the implementation of significant security measures,
these systems may still be vulnerable to physical break-ins,
computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties
or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of security could
deter people from entering into transactions that involve
transmitting confidential information to our systems, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Any
disruption in the availability of our information systems could
adversely affect our business operations.
We rely upon our information systems to manage and operate our
retail financial services stores and other businesses. Each
store is part of an information network that is designed to
permit us to maintain adequate cash inventory, reconcile cash
balances on a daily basis and report revenues and expenses to
our headquarters. Our
back-up
systems and security measures could fail to prevent a disruption
in our information systems. Any disruption in our information
systems could adversely affect our business, prospects, results
of operations and financial condition.
We
have a significant amount of goodwill which is subject to
periodic review and testing for impairment.
As of June 30, 2010, we had goodwill of
$609.0 million, representing a significant portion of the
$1.2 billion in total assets reflected on our consolidated
balance sheet as of such date. A substantial portion of our
goodwill represents assets capitalized in connection with our
historical acquisitions and business combinations. Accounting
for intangible assets such as goodwill requires us to make
significant estimates and judgments, and as a result we make not
realize the value of such intangible assets. In accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, we conduct an
impairment analysis of our goodwill annually and at such other
times when an event or change in circumstances occurs which
would indicate potential impairment. A variety of factors could
cause the carrying value of an intangible asset to become
impaired, including that our cash flow from operations is not
sufficient to meet our future liquidity needs. Should such a
review indicate impairment, a write-down of the carrying value
of the intangible asset would occur, resulting in a non-cash
charge, which could adversely affect our reported results of
operations and could materially impact the reported balance of
our total stockholders equity.
The
price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been subject to
significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or
decline. Over the course of the twelve months ended
June 30, 2010, the market price of our common stock has
been as high as $27.21, and as low as $12.88. The market price
of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be,
subject to significant fluctuations due to a variety of factors,
including global economic and market conditions, quarterly
variations in operating results, operating results which vary
from the expectations of securities analysts and investors,
changes in financial estimates, changes in market valuations of
competitors, announcements by us or our competitors of a
material nature, additions or departures of key personnel,
changes in applicable laws and regulations governing consumer
protection and lending practices, the effects of litigation,
future sales of common stock, and general stock market price and
volume fluctuations. In addition, general political and economic
conditions such as a recession, or interest rate or currency
rate fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the
common stock of many companies, including our common stock. A
significant decline in our stock price could result in
substantial losses for individual stockholders and could lead to
costly and disruptive securities litigation.
24
We
have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain any future earnings for use
in the growth and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future.
Our
anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in
control of our company, even if such change of control would be
beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws as well as
provisions of Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a
merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company,
even if such change in control would be beneficial to our
stockholders. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
a board of directors that is classified such that only one-third
of directors are elected each year;
|
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of blank check preferred
stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase
the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special
meetings of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent and requiring
all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for
election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that
can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law limits business combination transactions with
15% stockholders that have not been approved by the board of
directors. These and similar provisions make it more difficult
for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These
provisions may apply even if the transaction may be considered
beneficial by some stockholders.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
All of our company-operated stores and our administrative
offices are leased, generally under leases providing for an
initial multi-year term and renewal terms from one to five
years. The leases for our company-operated stores may contain
provisions for additional rental charges based on revenue and
payment of real estate taxes and common area charges. We
generally assume the responsibility for required leasehold
improvements, including signage, customer service representative
partitions, alarm and recovery systems, computers, time-delayed
safes and other office equipment. With respect to leased
locations open as of June 30, 2010, the following table
shows the total number of leases expiring during the periods
indicated, assuming the exercise of our renewal options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
Period Ending June 30,
|
|
Leases Expiring
|
|
2011
|
|
|
238
|
|
2012 - 2014
|
|
|
512
|
|
2015 - 2019
|
|
|
298
|
|
2020 - 2024
|
|
|
65
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Store
Operations
Locations
The following chart sets forth the number of company-operated
and franchised stores in operation as of the specified dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
Markets/Reporting Segments
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
UNITED STATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WE THE PEOPLE*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchised locations
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Franchised locations
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM/EURO-ZONE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Franchised/agent locations
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stores
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Included in our Other reporting segment. |
We generally assume the responsibility for required leasehold
improvements, including signage, customer service representative
partitions, alarm and security systems, computers, time-delayed
safes and other office equipment. We adhere to a strict set of
market survey and location guidelines when selecting store sites
in order to ensure that our stores are placed in desired
locations near our customers.
The following table reflects the change in the number of stores
during fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Number of stores at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
New stores opened
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Stores acquired
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Stores closed
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Net change in franchise/agent stores
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of stores at end of period
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The information required by this Item 3 is incorporated by
reference herein to the section in Part II, Item 8
Note 13. Contingent Liabilities of this Annual
Report on Form 10K.
|
|
Item 4.
|
REMOVED
AND RESERVED
|
26
|
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol DLLR. Below is a summary of the
high and low prices of our common stock for each quarterly
period during the two-year period ending June 30, 2010 as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
July 1, 2008 until September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
21.91
|
|
|
$
|
14.92
|
|
October 1, 2008 until December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
$
|
5.89
|
|
January 1, 2009 until March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
|
$
|
4.83
|
|
April 1, 2009 until June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
8.41
|
|
July 1, 2009 until September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
18.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.88
|
|
October 1, 2009 until December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
25.50
|
|
|
$
|
14.98
|
|
January 1, 2010 until March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
25.31
|
|
|
$
|
20.30
|
|
April 1, 2010 until June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
27.21
|
|
|
$
|
17.59
|
|
Holders
On July 31, 2010, there were approximately 109 holders of
record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently expect to retain any future earnings for use
in the operation and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends on our common
stock will be dependent upon the ability of Dollar Financial
Group, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, to pay dividends or
make cash payments or advances to us. Our credit agreement, as
amended and restated as of December 23, 2009, contains
restrictions on our declaration and payment of dividends. See
Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the notes to consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this Annual Report as
Form 10-K.
For example, Dollar Financial Group, Inc.s ability to pay
dividends or to make other distributions to us, and thus our
ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock, will depend
upon, among other things, its level of indebtedness at the time
of the proposed dividend or distribution, whether it is in
default under its financing agreements and the amount of
dividends or distributions made in the past. Our future dividend
policy will also depend on the requirements of any future
financing agreements to which we may be a party and other
factors considered relevant by our board of directors, including
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which
provides that dividends are only payable out of surplus or
current net profits.
27
Stock
Performance Graph
The rules of the Securities Exchange Commission require us to
present a chart comparing the cumulative total stockholder
return on our common stock with the cumulative total stockholder
return of (i) a broad equity index and (ii) a
published industry or peer group index. Set forth below is a
graph and table indicating the value at the end of the specified
time periods of a $100 investment made on June 30, 2005 in
our common stock and similar investments made in the Nasdaq
Composite Index and securities of companies in a peer group of
financial services companies comprised of Advance America Cash
Advance Centers, Inc., Cash America International, Inc., EZCorp
Inc., First Cash Financial Services, Inc., and QC Holdings, Inc.
The graph and table assume the reinvestment of any dividends
received.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/05
|
|
|
|
12/05
|
|
|
|
6/06
|
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
|
6/07
|
|
|
|
12/07
|
|
|
|
6/08
|
|
|
|
12/08
|
|
|
|
6/09
|
|
|
|
12/09
|
|
|
|
6/10
|
|
Dollar Financial Corp.
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
113.01
|
|
|
|
|
169.65
|
|
|
|
|
262.58
|
|
|
|
|
268.61
|
|
|
|
|
289.26
|
|
|
|
|
142.41
|
|
|
|
|
97.08
|
|
|
|
|
129.97
|
|
|
|
|
222.81
|
|
|
|
|
186.52
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
107.58
|
|
|
|
|
107.08
|
|
|
|
|
120.84
|
|
|
|
|
130.99
|
|
|
|
|
131.77
|
|
|
|
|
114.02
|
|
|
|
|
78.16
|
|
|
|
|
90.79
|
|
|
|
|
112.82
|
|
|
|
|
105.54
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
96.99
|
|
|
|
|
141.15
|
|
|
|
|
163.82
|
|
|
|
|
158.09
|
|
|
|
|
113.29
|
|
|
|
|
97.32
|
|
|
|
|
90.82
|
|
|
|
|
84.05
|
|
|
|
|
118.77
|
|
|
|
|
116.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are
derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be
read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The consolidated statements of operations data for each of the
years June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 are derived
from, and qualified by reference to, our audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in
this Annual Report as
Form 10-K.
The consolidated statements of operations data for each of the
years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of results
for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
$
|
142,470
|
|
|
$
|
166,754
|
|
|
$
|
196,580
|
|
|
$
|
164,598
|
|
|
$
|
149,474
|
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
158,299
|
|
|
|
221,775
|
|
|
|
282,480
|
|
|
|
266,506
|
|
|
|
319,465
|
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
17,205
|
|
|
|
20,879
|
|
|
|
27,512
|
|
|
|
26,823
|
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
Pawn service fees and sales
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
7,390
|
|
|
|
12,116
|
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
19,899
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35,461
|
|
|
|
38,934
|
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
|
|
56,132
|
|
|
|
94,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
358,888
|
|
|
|
455,732
|
|
|
|
572,184
|
|
|
|
527,853
|
|
|
|
610,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
106,823
|
|
|
|
129,522
|
|
|
|
159,363
|
|
|
|
145,716
|
|
|
|
153,976
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
30,367
|
|
|
|
45,799
|
|
|
|
58,458
|
|
|
|
52,136
|
|
|
|
45,876
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
27,914
|
|
|
|
32,270
|
|
|
|
43,018
|
|
|
|
41,812
|
|
|
|
43,280
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
9,455
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
13,075
|
|
|
|
14,334
|
|
Other
|
|
|
69,024
|
|
|
|
83,195
|
|
|
|
98,452
|
|
|
|
93,310
|
|
|
|
107,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
241,962
|
|
|
|
300,241
|
|
|
|
372,954
|
|
|
|
346,049
|
|
|
|
364,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
116,926
|
|
|
|
155,491
|
|
|
|
199,230
|
|
|
|
181,804
|
|
|
|
246,340
|
|
Corporate and other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
41,051
|
|
|
|
53,327
|
|
|
|
70,859
|
|
|
|
68,217
|
|
|
|
86,824
|
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
7,325
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
29,702
|
|
|
|
31,462
|
|
|
|
44,378
|
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
|
|
68,932
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,784
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
Goodwill impairment and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
10,145
|
|
Provision for (proceeds from) litigation settlements
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
(3,256
|
)
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
57,920
|
|
|
|
29,074
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
12,948
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
5,487
|
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
34,479
|
|
|
|
5,532
|
|
|
|
79,379
|
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
|
|
16,177
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
27,514
|
|
|
|
37,735
|
|
|
|
36,015
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
21,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6,965
|
|
|
$
|
(32,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,192
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dollar Financial Corp.
|
|
$
|
6,965
|
|
|
$
|
(32,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Dollar
Financial Corp:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Shares used to calculate net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,280,131
|
|
|
|
23,571,203
|
|
|
|
24,106,392
|
|
|
|
24,012,705
|
|
|
|
24,106,565
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,722,753
|
|
|
|
23,571,203
|
|
|
|
24,563,229
|
|
|
|
24,012,705
|
|
|
|
24,106,565
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operating and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
20,870
|
|
|
$
|
29,277
|
|
|
$
|
80,756
|
|
|
$
|
59,204
|
|
|
$
|
86,704
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(39,415
|
)
|
|
$
|
(170,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
(166,956
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,954
|
)
|
|
$
|
(184,447
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
39,696
|
|
|
$
|
307,358
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
$
|
2,669
|
|
|
$
|
169,791
|
|
Stores in operation at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-owned
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
Franchised stores/agents
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
118,653
|
|
|
$
|
290,945
|
|
|
$
|
209,714
|
|
|
$
|
209,602
|
|
|
$
|
291,294
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
551,825
|
|
|
$
|
831,775
|
|
|
$
|
941,412
|
|
|
$
|
921,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,214,621
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
311,037
|
|
|
$
|
521,150
|
|
|
$
|
535,586
|
|
|
$
|
536,305
|
|
|
$
|
728,592
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
161,953
|
|
|
$
|
199,899
|
|
|
$
|
239,432
|
|
|
$
|
209,078
|
|
|
$
|
218,343
|
|
30
|
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Executive
Summary
Overview
We are a leading international diversified financial services
company serving primarily unbanked and under-banked consumers.
Through our retail storefront locations as well as by other
means, such as via the Internet, we provide a range of consumer
financial products and services in five countries; Canada, the
United Kingdom, the United States, the Republic of Ireland and
Poland, to customers who, for reasons of convenience and
accessibility, purchase some or all of their financial services
from us rather than from banks and other financial institutions.
We believe that our networks of retail locations in Canada and
the United Kingdom are the largest of their kind in each of
those countries, and that we operate the second-largest network
of its kind in the United States. As of June 30, 2010, our
global retail operations consisted of 1,180 retail locations, of
which 1,058 are company-owned, conducting business primarily
under the names Money
Mart®,
Money
Shop®,
Loan
Mart®,
Money
Corner®,
Insta-Cheques®
and The Check Cashing
Store®
in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and the
Republic of Ireland. Through our branded Military Installment
Loan and Education Services, or
MILES®,
program offered by our Dealers Financial Services, LLC
subsidiary which we acquired in December 2009, we also provide
services to enlisted military personnel applying for loans to
purchase new and used vehicles that are funded and serviced
under an exclusive agreement with a major third-party national
bank.
Historically, we have derived our revenues primarily from
providing check cashing services, consumer lending and other
consumer financial products and services, including money
orders, money transfers, foreign currency exchange, branded
debit cards, pawn lending, gold buying and bill payment. For our
check cashing services, we charge our customers fees that are
usually equal to a percentage of the amount of the check being
cashed and are deducted from the cash provided to the customer.
For our consumer loans, including pawn lending, we receive
interest and fees on the loans.
Our expenses primarily relate to the operations of our store
network, including the provision for loan losses, salaries and
benefits for our employees, occupancy expense for our leased
real estate, depreciation of our assets and corporate and other
expenses, including costs related to opening and closing stores.
In each foreign country in which we operate, local currency is
used for both revenues and expenses. Therefore, we record the
impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to
our foreign net income.
As we continue to diversify our organization, we expect the
contributions to our revenue and profitability from fee-based
financial processing and origination services to increase.
During fiscal 2010, approximately 50% of our total consolidated
revenue was comprised of products and services which generally
carry little or no credit risk, such as check cashing, money
transfers, gold purchasing, secured pawn lending and fee-based
income generated from the MILES program.
We manage our business as five operating segments
our financial services offerings in each of Canada, the United
Kingdom, the Unites States and Poland, as well as our
Dealers Financial Services, LLC subsidiary, which we
operate independently of our other businesses.
Recent
Events
On June 30, 2008, as part of a process to rationalize our
United States markets, we made a determination to close 24 of
our unprofitable stores in various United States markets. In
August 2008, we identified another 30 stores in the United
States and 17 stores in Canada that were under-performing and
which were closed or merged into a geographically proximate
store. The primary cease-use date for these stores was in
September 2008. Customers from these stores were transitioned to
our other stores in close proximity to the stores affected. We
recorded costs for severance and other retention benefits of
$0.6 million and store closure costs of $4.9 million
consisting primarily of lease obligations and leasehold
improvement write-offs. Subsequent to
31
the initial expense amounts recorded, we recorded
$0.9 million of additional lease obligation expense for
these locations. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2009, we announced the closing of an
additional 60 under-performing U.S. store locations. We
recorded costs for severance and other retention benefits of
approximately $0.4 million and store closure related costs
of approximately $3.2 million consisting primarily of lease
obligations and leasehold improvement write-offs. For the twelve
months ended June 30, 2010 (fiscal 2010), we
recorded an additional $1.4 million of current year store
closure related costs. We also recorded $1.9 million of
store closure related expenses associated with prior year store
closures and the buy-out of certain We The People
franchises. The closure of stores in the United States and
Canada did not result in any impairment of goodwill since the
store closures will be accretive to cash flow.
On July 21, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors
had approved a stock repurchase plan, authorizing us to
repurchase in the aggregate up to $7.5 million of our
outstanding common stock and by October 13, 2008, we had
repurchased 535,799 shares of our common stock at a cost of
approximately $7.5 million, thus completing our stock
repurchase plan.
On April 21, 2009, we completed the acquisition of an
established profitable U.K. internet-based consumer lending
business which was immediately accretive to earnings. The
acquired company is competitively positioned in a rapidly
growing market and further expands our expertise within the
internet lending arena. Moreover, we believe we can export and
leverage this expertise to other European countries as well as
our Canadian business unit.
On June 29, 2009, we completed the acquisition of two
market-leading traditional pawn shops located in Edinburgh and
Glasgow, Scotland. The two stores were established in the year
1830 and primarily deal in loans securitized by gold jewelry and
fine watches, while offering traditional secured pawn lending
for an array of other items. Both stores are located in
prominent locations on major thoroughfares and high pedestrian
traffic zones.
On June 30, 2009, we completed the acquisition of four
stores in Northern Ireland. Three of the stores are located in
central Belfast, with the fourth store situated in the town of
Lisburn, the third largest city in Northern Ireland. The
acquired stores are multi-product locations offering check
cashing, single payment consumer lending and pawn broking
services.
On June 30, 2009, we completed the acquisition of 76% of
the outstanding equity of an established consumer lending
business in Poland. The acquired company, Optima, S.A., founded
in 1999 and headquartered in Gdansk, offers unsecured loans of
generally 40 50 week durations with an average
loan amount of $250 to $500. The loan transaction includes a
convenient in-home servicing feature, whereby loan disbursement
and collection activities take place in the customers home
according to a mutually agreed upon and pre-arranged schedule.
The in-home loan servicing concept is well accepted within
Poland and Eastern Europe, and was initially established in the
United Kingdom approximately 100 years ago. Customer sales
and service activities are managed through an extensive network
of local commission-based representatives across six provinces
in northwestern Poland.
On October 3, 2009, we entered into an agreement to acquire
a merchant cash advance business in the United Kingdom. The
acquired company primarily services the working capital needs of
small retail businesses by providing cash advances secured
against a percentage of future credit card sales. The purchase
price for the acquired company, which currently manages a
receivable portfolio of approximately $3.5 million, was
$4.6 million.
On December 21, 2009, we commenced the closing of an
exchange offer with certain holders of our 2.875% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2027, which we refer to as the 2027 Notes,
pursuant to the terms of privately negotiated exchange
agreements with such holders. Pursuant to the terms of the
exchange agreements, the holders exchanged an aggregate of
$120.0 million principal amount of the 2027 Notes held by
such holders for an equal aggregate principal amount of our new
3.0% Senior Convertible Notes due 2028, which we refer to
as the 2028 Notes. The 2028 Notes are senior, unsecured
obligations and rank equal in right of payment to all of our
other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and are
effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future
secured debt and to the indebtedness and other liabilities of
its subsidiaries.
32
On December 23, 2009, our indirect wholly-owned Canadian
subsidiary, National Money Mart Company, which we refer to as
Money Mart, sold $600.0 million aggregate principal amount
of its 10.375% Senior Notes due 2016, which we refer to as
the 2016 Notes. The 2016 Notes were issued pursuant to an
indenture, dated as of December 23, 2009, among Money Mart,
as issuer, Dollar Financial Corp. and certain of our direct and
indirect wholly-owned U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, as
guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.
The 2016 Notes bear interest at the rate of 10.375% per year.
On December 23, 2009, we acquired Military Financial
Services, LLC, including its subsidiaries, Dealers
Financial Services, LLC and Dealers Financial Services
Reinsurance Ltd., which we collectively refer to as DFS. DFS is
an established business that provides fee based services to
enlisted military personnel seeking to purchase new and used
vehicles. DFS markets its services through its branded Military
Installment Loan and Education Services, or MILES,
program. DFS provides services to enlisted military personnel
who make applications for auto loans to purchase new and used
vehicles that are funded and serviced under an exclusive
agreement with a major third-party national bank based in the
United States. Additionally, DFS provides ancillary services
such as service contracts and guaranteed asset protection, or
GAP insurance, along with consultations regarding new and used
automotive purchasing, budgeting and credit and ownership
training. We paid a purchase price of approximately
$117.8 million plus approximately $5.5 million on
account of the working capital as of the closing date.
In February 2010, we repurchased $35.2 million aggregate
principal amount of 2027 Notes in privately negotiated
transactions with three of the holders of the 2027 Notes. We
paid 91% of the stated principal amount of the repurchased 2027
Notes for an aggregate price of $32.0 million. As a result
of these repurchase transactions and the exchange transactions
described above, $44.8 million aggregate principal amount
of the 2027 Notes remains outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
Effective March 3, 2010, the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice approved the settlement of the pending class action
against OPCO and Money Mart in Ontario commenced on behalf of a
purported class of Ontario borrowers who, it was alleged, were
subjected to usurious charges in payday loan transactions in
violation of Canadian federal law proscribing usury.
On March 4, 2010, Money Mart and OPCO reached an agreement
to settle their outstanding British Columbia class action
litigation in which the plaintiffs claimed that the business
model used by Money Mart resulted in the collection of fees in
excess of the statutory limit for loans made since 1997. Under
the terms of the British Columbia settlement, Money Mart will
create a settlement fund in an amount of CAD 24.8 million,
consisting of CAD 12.4 million in cash and CAD
12.4 million in vouchers. Fees payable to plaintiffs
counsel will be paid from this fund. The settlement is set forth
in a definitive settlement agreement executed on May 7,
2010 which received final court approval on July 19, 2010.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, Money Mart
recorded a charge of CAD 23.2 million in relation to the
pending settlements of the British Columbia Litigation and for
the potential settlement of the other pending and purported
Canadian class action proceedings described above. During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, Money Mart recorded a
charge of CAD 64.7 million in relation to then pending
settlement of the Ontario Litigation and for the potential
settlement of the other pending and purported Canadian class
action proceedings described above. As of June 30, 2010, an
aggregate of approximately CAD 77.5 million is included in
the Companys accrued expenses relating to the Canadian
proceedings described above. Of those expenses, approximately
CAD 37.7 million is expected to be non-cash. Although we
believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims in the
pending and purported class proceedings described above and
intend vigorously to defend against such remaining pending
claims, the ultimate cost of resolution of such claims may
exceed the amount accrued at June 30, 2010 and additional
accruals may be required in the future.
On April 13, 2010, we entered into a purchase agreement to
acquire all of the shares of Suttons & Robertsons
(S&R). S&R is the fourth largest pawn
lending business in the United Kingdom. S&Rs three
London-based stores focus on high value gold jewelry, watches
and diamonds. The purchase price of the acquisition, including
approximately GBP 6.0 million of net assets, was GBP
16.9 million.
33
Discussion
of Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of
estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results
of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. We evaluate these estimates on
an ongoing basis, including those related to revenue
recognition, loan loss reserves and goodwill and intangible
assets. We base these estimates on the information currently
available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe
are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
vary from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies
affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our financial statements:
Revenue
Recognition
With respect to company-operated stores, revenues from our check
cashing, money order sales, money transfer, foreign currency
exchange and other miscellaneous services reported in other
revenues on our statement of operations are all recognized when
the transactions are completed at the
point-of-sale
in the store.
With respect to the Companys franchised locations, the
Company recognizes initial franchise fees upon fulfillment of
all significant obligations to the franchisee. Royalties from
franchisees are recognized as earned. The Companys
standard franchise agreement grants to the franchisee the right
to develop and operate a store and use the associated trade
names, trademarks, and service marks within the standards and
guidelines established by the Company. As part of the franchise
agreement, the Company provides certain pre-opening assistance
and after the franchised location has opened, the Company also
provides updates to software, samples of certain advertising and
promotional materials and other post-opening assistance.
For single-payment consumer loans (company-funded loans), which
have terms ranging from 1 to 45 days and for longer-term
consumer installment loans, revenues are recognized using the
interest method. Loan origination fees are recognized as an
adjustment to the yield on the related loan. Our reserve policy
regarding these loans is summarized below in
Company-Funded Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy.
Secured pawn loans are offered at most of our retail financial
services locations in the United Kingdom. We also operate two
traditional pawn shops in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Scotland, and
three pawn shops in London, England specializing in high value
gold jewelry, watches and diamonds. Pawn loans are short-term in
nature and are secured by the customers personal property
(pledge). At the time of pledge, the loan is
recorded and interest and fees are accrued for over the life of
the loan. If the loan is not repaid, the collateral is deemed
forfeited and the pawned item will go up for auction. If the
item is sold, proceeds are used to recover the loan value,
interest accrued and fees. Excess funds received from the sale
are repaid to the customer. As with our single-payment consumer
loans, revenues are recognized using the interest rate method
and loan origination fees are recognized as an adjustment to the
yield on the related loan.
DFS fee income associated with originated loan contracts is
recognized as revenue by the Company concurrent with the funding
of loans by the lending financial institution. The Company also
earns additional fee income from sales of service agreement and
guaranteed asset protection (GAP) insurance
contracts. DFS may be charged back (chargebacks) for
service agreement and GAP fees in the event contracts are
prepaid, defaulted or terminated. Service agreement and GAP
contract fees are recorded at the time the contracts are sold
and a reserve for future chargebacks are established based on
historical operating results and the termination provisions of
the applicable contracts. Service warranty and GAP contract
fees, net of estimated chargebacks, are included in Other
Revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Company-Funded
Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy
We maintain a loan loss reserve for probable losses inherent in
the outstanding loan portfolio for single-payment and other
consumer loans that we make directly through our
company-operated locations. To estimate the appropriate level of
loan loss reserves, we consider known and relevant internal and
external factors that affect loan collectability, including the
amount of outstanding loans owed to us, historical loans charged
off,
34
current collection patterns and current economic trends. Our
current loan loss reserve is based on our net charge-offs,
typically expressed as a percentage of loan amounts originated
for the last twelve months applied against the total amount of
outstanding loans that we make directly. As these conditions
change, we may need to make additional allowances in future
periods. Despite the economic downturn in the United States and
the foreign markets in which we operate, we have not experienced
any material increase in the defaults on outstanding loans,
although we have tightened lending criteria. Accordingly, we
have not modified our approach to determining our loan loss
reserves.
When a loan is originated, the customer receives the cash
proceeds in exchange for a post-dated customer check or a
written authorization to initiate a charge to the
customers bank account on the stated maturity date of the
loan. If the check or the debit to the customers account
is returned from the bank unpaid, the loan is placed in default
status and an additional reserve for this defaulted loan
receivable is established and charged to operating expenses in
the period that the loan is placed in default status. This
reserve is reviewed monthly and any additional provision to the
loan loss reserve as a result of historical loan performance,
current collection patterns and current economic trends is
charged to operating expenses. If the loans remain in defaulted
status for 180 days, a reserve for the entire amount of the
loan is recorded and the receivable and corresponding reserve is
ultimately removed from the balance sheet. The receivable for
defaulted single-payment loans, net of the allowance of
$14.4 million at June 30, 2010 and $17.0 million
at June 30, 2009, is reported on our balance sheet in loans
in default, net, and was $7.3 million at June 30, 2010
and $6.4 million at June 30, 2009.
Check
Cashing Returned Item Policy
We charge operating expense for losses on returned checks during
the period in which such checks are returned, which generally is
three to five business days after the check is cashed in our
store. Recoveries on returned checks are credited to operating
expense during the period in which recovery is made. This direct
method for recording returned check losses and recoveries
eliminates the need for an allowance for returned checks. These
net losses are charged to other store and regional expenses in
the consolidated statements of operations.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net
assets of the business acquired. In accordance with the
Intangibles Topic of the FASB Codification, goodwill is assigned
to reporting units, which we have determined to be our
reportable operating segments of the United States Retail,
Canada, the United Kingdom, DFS and Poland (which is reported in
Other). We also have a corporate reporting unit which consists
of costs related to corporate management, oversight and
infrastructure, investor relations and other governance
activities. Because of the limited activities of the corporate
reporting unit, no goodwill has been assigned to it. Goodwill is
assigned to the reporting unit that benefits from the synergies
arising from each particular business combination. The
determination that the operating segments are equivalent to the
reporting units for goodwill allocation purposes is based upon
our overall approach to managing our business along operating
segment lines, and the consistency of the operations within each
operating segment. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an
annual basis on June 30 or between annual tests if events occur
or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. To
accomplish this, we are required to determine the carrying value
of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities,
including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those
reporting units. We are then required to determine the fair
value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying
amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount
of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting
unit, we would be required to perform a second step to the
impairment test because this is an indication that the reporting
unit goodwill may be impaired. If after the second step of
testing, the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
fair value of the individual tangible and identifiable
intangible assets, an impairment loss would be recognized in an
amount equal to the excess of the implied fair value of the
reporting units goodwill over its carrying value.
35
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of reacquired
franchise rights and DFS MILES program, which are deemed
to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized.
Non-amortizable
intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment
annually as of December 31, or whenever events or changes
in business circumstances indicate that an asset may be
impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying
amount of the intangible assets with indefinite lives, then an
impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the asset to its
estimated fair value.
We consider this to be one of the critical accounting estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units
using a discounted cash flow analysis. This analysis requires us
to make various assumptions about revenues, operating margins,
growth rates, and discount rates. These assumptions are based on
our budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated
future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions are also
made for perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the period
covered by our long term business plan. We perform our goodwill
impairment test annually as of June 30, and our
non-amortizable
intangibles with indefinite lives are tested annually as of
December 31. At the date of our last evaluations, there was
no impairment of goodwill or reacquired franchise rights.
However, we may be required to evaluate the recoverability of
goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required
annual assessment if we experience a significant disruption to
our business, unexpected significant declines in our operating
results, divestiture of a significant component of our business,
a sustained decline in market capitalization, particularly if it
falls below our book value, or a significant change to the
regulatory environment in which we operate. While we believe we
have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the
fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets,
it is possible that a material change could occur, including if
actual experience differs from the assumptions and
considerations used in our analyses. These differences could
have a material adverse impact on the consolidated results of
operations and cause us to perform the second step impairment
test, which could result in a material impairment of our
goodwill. We will continue to monitor our actual cash flows and
other factors that may trigger a future impairment in the light
of the current global recession.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Derivative and Hedging Topic of the FASB Codification
requires companies to provide users of financial statements with
an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments
and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. This Topic also requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and
losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
instruments.
As required by the Derivative and Hedging Topic of the FASB
Codification, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at
fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of
derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative,
whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging
relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging
relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge
accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of
the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset,
liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk,
such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure
to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of
forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign
currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the
timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument
with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the
hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged
risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged
forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We may enter into
derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge
certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not
apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
36
Put
Options
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada expose the Company
to shifts in currency valuations. From time to time, we purchase
put options in order to protect aspects of our operations in the
United Kingdom and Canada against foreign currency fluctuations.
Out of the money put options are generally used because they
cost less than completely averting risk using at the money put
options, and the maximum loss is limited to the purchase price
of the contracts. We have designated the purchased put options
as cash flow hedges of the foreign exchange risk associated with
the forecasted purchases of foreign-currency-denominated
investment securities. These cash flow hedges have maturities of
less than twelve months. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portions of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument are
initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as
a separate component of stockholders equity and are
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during
which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. Any
ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in other
income/expense on the statement of operations. For options
designated as hedges, hedge effectiveness is measured by
comparing the cumulative change in the hedge contract with the
cumulative change in the hedged forecasted transactions, both of
which are based on forward rates.
Cross-Currency
Interest Rate Swaps
From time to time, we enter into cross-currency interest rate
swaps to protect against changes in cash flows attributable to
changes in both the benchmark interest rate and foreign exchange
rates on its foreign denominated variable rate term loan
borrowing. In the past, the Company designated derivative
contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. We
recorded foreign exchange re-measurement gains and losses
related to the term loans and also records the changes in fair
value of the cross-currency swaps each period in loss/gain on
derivatives not designated as hedges in our consolidated
statements of operations. Because these derivatives were
designated as cash flow hedges, we recorded the effective
portion of the after-tax gain or loss in other comprehensive
income, which was subsequently reclassified to earnings in the
same period that the hedged transactions affect earnings.
At such time that the derivatives no longer met the requirements
of hedge accounting and to the extent that third party debt
remained outstanding, we concluded that the original hedged
transactions were still probable of occurring. Therefore, in
accordance with the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB
Codification, we continued to report the net gain or loss
related to the discontinued cash flow hedges in other
accumulated comprehensive income and is subsequently
reclassifying such amounts into earnings over the remaining
original term of the derivative as the hedged forecasted
transactions are recognized in earnings.
Income
Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial
statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each
of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves
estimating the actual current tax liability together with
assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which
are included within our consolidated balance sheet. An
assessment is then made of the likelihood that the deferred tax
assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the
extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a
valuation allowance. We intend to reinvest our foreign earnings
and a result, we do not provide a deferred tax liability on
foreign earnings.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes pursuant to Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) Accounting
Codification Statement (ASC) 740, Income Taxes
(ASC 740), (formerly FIN 48). We recognize
the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is
more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on
examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such positions are then measured based
on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of
being realized upon settlement. Interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, are recognized in the
income tax provision.
37
Results
of Operations
The percentages presented in the following table are based on
each respective fiscal years total consolidated revenues
as well as the reportable segment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
$
|
196,580
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
164,598
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
149,474
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
282,480
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
%
|
|
|
266,506
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
%
|
|
|
319,465
|
|
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
27,512
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
26,823
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Pawn service fees and sales
|
|
|
12,116
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
19,899
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
56,132
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
94,625
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenues
|
|
|
572,184
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
527,853
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
610,927
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Retail revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
|
57,438
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
56,378
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
46,459
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
79,838
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
79,612
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
65,675
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,926
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
10,954
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Retail revenues
|
|
|
150,907
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
152,870
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
127,754
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DFS revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DFS revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
|
81,806
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
67,830
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
69,414
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
147,313
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
121,518
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
147,851
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
15,092
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
16,439
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
34,248
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
31,827
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
43,116
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Canadian revenues
|
|
|
279,491
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
236,267
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
276,820
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
|
57,336
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
40,390
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
33,601
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
55,329
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
65,376
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
98,871
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
6,184
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Pawn service fees and sales
|
|
|
12,116
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
19,899
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
8,537
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
11,363
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
25,484
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United Kingdom revenues
|
|
|
138,962
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
136,728
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
184,039
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
7,068
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other revenues
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
159,363
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
145,716
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
153,976
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
58,458
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
52,136
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
45,876
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
43,018
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
41,812
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
43,280
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
13,075
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
14,334
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
98,452
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
93,310
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
107,121
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
372,954
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
|
346,049
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
%
|
|
|
364,587
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
199,230
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
%
|
|
|
181,804
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
246,340
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
70,859
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
68,217
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
86,824
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,325
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
44,378
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
68,932
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
10,145
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Loss (gain) on derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
12,948
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Provision for litigation settlements
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
57,920
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
29,074
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Loss on store closings
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
10,340
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4,853
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
79,379
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
16,177
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
36,015
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
21,369
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(5,192
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-contolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dollar Financial Corp.
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant
Currency Analysis
We maintain operations primarily in the United States, Canada
and United Kingdom. Approximately 70% of our revenues are
originated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar,
principally the Canadian Dollar and British Pound Sterling. As a
result, changes in our reported revenues and profits include the
impacts of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. As
additional information to the reader, we provide constant
currency assessments in the following discussion and
analysis to remove
and/or
quantify the impact of the fluctuation in foreign exchange rates
and utilize constant currency results in our analysis of segment
performance. Our constant currency assessment assumes foreign
exchange rates in the current fiscal periods remained the same
as in the prior fiscal year periods. For the year ended
June 30, 2010, the actual average exchange rates used to
translate the Canadian and United Kingdoms results were
0.9484 and 1.5811, respectively. For our constant currency
reporting for comparing fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the average
exchange rates used for the year ended June 30, 2009 to
translate the Canadian and United Kingdoms results were
0.8625 and 1.6125, respectively. For our constant currency
reporting for comparing fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, the average
exchange rates used for the year ended June 30, 2008 to
translate the Canadian and United Kingdoms results
were 0.9907 and 2.0036, respectively. All conversion rates are
based on the U.S. Dollar equivalent to one Canadian Dollar
and one Great British Pound.
We believe that our constant currency assessments are a useful
measure, indicating the actual growth and profitability of our
operations. Earnings from our subsidiaries are not generally
repatriated to the United States; therefore, we do not
incur significant economic gains or losses on foreign currency
transactions with our subsidiaries. To the extent funds are
transmitted between countries, we may be subject to realized
foreign exchange gains or losses. To the extent liabilities are
paid or assets are received in a currency other than the local
currency, we would incur realized transactional foreign exchange
gains or losses. Cash accounts are maintained in Canada and the
U.K. in local currency, and as a result, there is little, if any
diminution in value from the changes in currency rates.
Therefore, cash balances are available on a local currency basis
to fund the daily operations of the Canadian and U.K. business
units.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Revenues Total revenues for the year ended
June 30, 2010 increased $83.1 million, or 15.7%, as
compared to the year ended June 30, 2009. The impact of
foreign currency accounted for $22.5 million of the
increase and the impact of new stores and acquisitions
contributed $68.2 million of the increase. On a constant
39
currency basis and excluding the impacts of new stores and
acquisitions, total revenues decreased by $7.6 million or
1.4%. The decrease was primarily the result of a
$25.5 million decrease in the U.S. revenues primarily
related to the closure of 60 under-performing store locations
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Relative to our products, consolidated check cashing revenue
decreased $15.1 million or 9.2% for the year ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the prior year. There was an
increase of approximately $5.3 million related to foreign
exchange rates and increases from new stores and acquisitions of
$2.6 million. The remaining check cashing revenues were
down $23.0 million or 14.0% for the year ended
June 30, 2010. Check cashing revenues from our
U.S. Retail business segment decreased 17.9%, again heavily
influenced by the closure of under-performing stores during
fiscal 2009 and the economic downturn. On a constant currency
basis and excluding the impacts of new stores and acquisitions,
the Canadian check cashing revenues declined 6.7% and the U.K.
check cashing revenues were down 20.7% for the year ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the prior year, reflecting the
continuing global recession. Further, studies by the Federal
Reserve Board and others suggest that payments made by
electronic means may be displacing a portion of the paper checks
traditionally cashed by our customers. On a consolidated
constant currency basis, the face amount of the average check
cashed decreased 0.6% to $484 for the year ended June 30,
2010 compared to $487 for the prior year period, while the
average fee per check cashed increased by 3.8% to $18.46. There
was also a decline of 15.6% in the number of checks cashed for
the year ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the year ended
June 30, 2009 down from 9.3 million in the
prior year to 7.8 million in the current year.
Consolidated fees from consumer lending were $319.5 million
for the year ended June 30, 2010 compared to
$266.5 million for the year earlier period, an increase of
$53.0 million or 19.9%. The impact of foreign currency
fluctuations accounted for an increase of approximately
$11.9 million and the impact of new stores and acquisitions
was an increase of $38.9 million. On a constant currency
basis and excluding the impacts of new stores and acquisitions,
consumer lending revenues increased by approximately
$2.2 million. The U.S. Retail consumer lending
revenues were down approximately $14.0 million while both
the Canadian and U.K.s consumer lending revenues were up
by $12.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively (on a
constant currency basis and excluding the impacts of new stores
and acquisitions). Consumer lending revenues in the
Other segment which is almost entirely comprised of
the results from our Polish lending operations, for the year
ended June 30, 2010 were approximately $7.1 million.
Pawn service fees were $19.9 million for the year ended
June 30, 2010, representing an increase of
$6.1 million or 44.3% compared to prior year period. The
impact of foreign currency fluctuations accounted for a nominal
decrease of $0.4 million and increases of approximately
$3.8 million related to the impact from new stores and
acquisitions. The remaining increase of $2.7 million or
19.6% is primarily due to managements increased emphasis
on promoting and growing the U.K. pawn business.
For the year ended June 30, 2010, money transfer fees,
scrap gold sales and all other revenues increased by
$39.1 million. On a constant currency basis and excluding
the impacts of new stores and acquisitions, these revenues
increased by $10.3 million, or 12.5%, for the year ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the prior year. The increase
was primarily due to the success of the foreign exchange
product, the debit card business and scrap gold sales in both
the United Kingdom and Canada.
Operating Expenses Operating expenses were
$364.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010
compared to $346.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2009, an increase of $18.6 million or 5.4%. The impact of
foreign currency accounted for an increase of
$11.7 million. There was an increase in the current
years operating expenses related to new stores and
acquisitions of approximately $52.7 million. On a constant
currency basis and excluding the impacts of new stores and
acquisitions, operating expenses decreased by $45.8 million
as compared to the prior year. For the year ended June 30,
2010, total operating expenses decreased to 59.7% of total
revenue compared to 65.6% of total revenue in the prior year.
After adjusting for constant currency reporting and excluding
the impacts of new stores and acquisitions, the percentage of
total operating expenses as compared to total revenue was 57.7%.
Relative to our primary business units, after excluding the
impacts of foreign currency and acquisitions, operating expenses
decreased in United States Retail, Canada and the United Kingdom
by $34.6 million,
40
$4.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively. These
decreases were a result of a focus on cost reductions in
addition to the closure of approximately 114 United States
stores during fiscal 2009.
Corporate Expenses Corporate expenses were
$86.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2010
compared to $68.2 million for the prior year or an increase
of $18.6 million. On a constant currency basis, corporate
expenses increased by approximately $16.9 million
reflecting an increased investment in our global infrastructure
to support global store, product and platform expansion plans as
well our investment in our global business development team
which is focused on acquisition and business development
strategies and execution.
Other Depreciation and Amortization Other
depreciation and amortization was $7.3 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $3.8 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009. The increase of $3.5 million
is primarily related to DFS amortization of identifiable
intangible assets.
Extinguishment of Debt In connection with our
refinancing activities during the year ended June 30, 2010,
certain non-recurring expenses have been reported in the current
periods results. There were $9.5 million of expenses
related to the repayment of our term loan debt and the exchange
of $120.0 million and repurchase of $35.2 million of
our 2.875% Senior Convertible Debt due 2027 that have been
reported as Extinguishment of Debt. Of that amount,
approximately $7.0 million related to the write-off of
pre-existing deferred term debt costs that were being amortized
over the life of the term debt. The other primary element of
this expense was a $3.9 million non-cash charge related to
our U.K. cross-currency interest rate swaps that had been
terminated in May 2009. Because the termination of the debt
caused management to conclude that the future cash flows
originally hedged would no longer occur, the net loss related to
the discontinued cash flow hedge that was included in other
comprehensive income was reclassified to the income statement.
Offsetting these charges in part was a $1.5 million gain on
the repurchase of the 2027 Notes.
Interest Expense Interest expense, net was
$68.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30,
2010 compared to $43.7 million for the same period in the
prior year. Interest related to our newly issued
$600.0 million principal 10.375% Senior Notes due 2016
accounted for $19.2 million of the increase, net of a
decrease in interest expense associated with our repayment of
all of our U.K. and Canadian term debt. In addition, interest
expense associated with our revolving credit facility and the
reduction in the amount of interest income earned by us
accounted for $1.3 million of the net increase.
Non-cash interest accounted for $4.7 million of the overall
increase. This increase is comprised of $4.2 million
related to the amortization of accumulated charges related to
the discontinuance of hedge accounting for our cross currency
interest rate swaps and $0.5 million related to the
amortization of deferred issuance costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to the prepayment of the majority of the Canadian
term debt on December 23, 2009, with the proceeds from our
$600.0 million senior note offering completed in December
2009 we discontinued hedge accounting on these cross-currency
swaps because we no longer achieved the requirements of hedge
accounting. However, in accordance with the Derivatives and
Hedging Topic of the FASB Codification, we continue to report
the net loss that existed at the time of the discontinuance of
the cash flow hedge in other accumulated comprehensive income
and are reclassifying this amount into earnings over the
remaining original term of the derivative when the hedged
forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings. This
resulted in a $3.3 million non-cash interest charge for
Fiscal 2010. Changes in the fair value of the cross-currency
swaps subsequent to the discontinuance of hedge accounting are
charged to the statement of operations.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to the early settlement in May 2009 of its two
cross-currency interest rate swaps hedging variable-rate
borrowings at our foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom, we
discontinued hedge accounting on these cross-currency swaps. In
accordance with the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB
Codification, we were required to continue to report the net
loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedge in other
comprehensive income included in shareholders equity and
subsequently reclassify such amounts into earnings over the
remaining original term of the derivative when the hedged
forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings. This
resulted in a $0.9 million non-cash interest
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
charge for Fiscal 2010. As a result of the repayment of all of
the United Kingdoms term debt, we reclassified all of the
U.K.s remaining net loss from other comprehensive income
into earnings. This charge to earnings is included as Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt which is included in the
Statement of Operations.
|
Unrealized Foreign Exchange
Gain/Loss Unrealized foreign exchange loss of
$10.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010 is due
primarily to the unrealized foreign exchange losses associated
with our newly issued $600 million senior notes and the
remaining term debt balance related to the Companys 2006
Credit Agreement, as amended. All of this debt was issued by our
indirectly wholly-owned Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries and is
denominated in currencies other than the reporting currency of
those entities. Near the end of the fiscal year, we retired the
remaining term debt related to the 2006 Credit Agreement, as
amended, leaving only the Canadian subsidiarys
$600 million in senior notes outstanding. The impact of all
prospective changes in the exchange rate between the
U.S. Dollar and the Canadian Dollar will be reflected in
our earnings as unrealized foreign exchange gains and
losses. The unrealized foreign exchange gain recorded for
the year ended June 30, 2009 was related to the term debt
outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreement, as amended.
Loss on Derivatives not Designated as
Hedges Loss on derivatives not designated as
hedges was $12.9 million for the year ended June 30,
2010 related to the change in fair value and the net additional
cash payments to the swap counter parties associated with our
cross-currency interest rate swaps in Canada related to the
legacy term loans. The change in fair value related to both the
changes in market interest and foreign exchange rates and
amendments that were made to the swap agreements required in
connection with the debt offerings completed during fiscal 2010.
Provision for Litigation Settlements Provision
for litigation settlements during the year ended June 30,
2010 was $29.1 million, primarily related to the
settlements of our class action litigation during the current
fiscal year in British Columbia and the Canadian Maritimes
province and for the potential settlement of other pending and
purported Canadian class action proceedings. During the year
ended June 30, 2009, we recorded $57.9 million of
Canadian litigation settlement provisions primarily related to
the settlement of our class action litigation in the province of
Ontario.
Loss on Store Closings During the year ended
June 30, 2010, we recorded additional expense related to
stores closed during fiscal 2009 of approximately
$1.0 million. This additional expense was related to
adjustment assumptions related to the
sub-lease
potential of some of the locations and the closure of other
non-performing U.S. store locations. We also incurred
additional expenses of approximately $1.4 million for
current period store closures. Lastly, we incurred approximately
$0.9 million of expense in relation to the buy-out of
certain We the People franchises. During the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009, we recorded store closure
expenses of $10.3 million of which $7.2 million
related to the U.S. Retail business, $3.0 million
related to the Canadian business and the remaining
$0.2 million related to the U.K. operations.
Income Tax Provision The provision for income
taxes was $21.4 million for fiscal 2010 compared to a
provision of $15.0 million for fiscal 2009. Our effective
tax rate for fiscal 2010 is 132.1%, which is a combination of an
effective rate of 96.1% on continuing operations and other
one-time charges increased by the impact of a change in the
reserve for an uncertain tax position related to transfer
pricing, and the impact of the convertible debt discount. The
impact to our fiscal 2010 provision for income taxes related to
these two items was $5.8 million. Our effective tax rate
differs from the statutory rate of 35% due to foreign taxes,
permanent differences and a valuation allowance on U.S. and
foreign deferred tax assets and the aforementioned changes to
our reserve for uncertain tax positions.
We believe that our ability to utilize pre-2007 net
operating losses in a given year will be limited to
$9.0 million under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code, which we refer to as the Code, because of changes of
ownership resulting from our June 2006 follow-on equity
offering. In addition, any future debt or equity transactions
may reduce our net operating losses or further limit our ability
to utilize the net operating losses under the Code. The net
operating loss carry forward as of June 30, 2010 is
$68.3 million. The deferred tax asset related to excess
foreign tax credits is also fully offset by a valuation
allowance of $54.6 million. Additionally, we maintain
foreign deferred tax assets in the amount of $24.6 million.
Of this amount,
42
$1.1 million was recorded by our Canadian affiliate during
fiscal 2007 related to a foreign currency loss sustained in
connection with the hedge of its term loan. This deferred tax
asset was offset by a full valuation allowance of
$1.1 million since the foreign currency loss is capital in
nature and at this time we have not identified any potential for
capital gains against which to offset the loss. This deferred
tax asset and valuation allowance was utilized in connection
with the repayment of the 2006 Canadian term debt in December
2009, but was replaced by a $1.0 million deferred tax asset
and valuation allowance related to the Canadian cross-currency
interest rate swap.
Effective July 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
ASC 740 (formerly FIN 48), which prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in
the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, ASC 740
provides guidance on the recognition, classification, accounting
in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax
positions. The implementation of ASC 740 did not result in
any adjustment in our liability for unrecognized income tax
benefits. At June 30, 2010, we had $10.3 million of
unrecognized tax benefits, primarily related to transfer pricing
matters, which if recognized, would affect our effective tax
rate.
The tax years ending June 30, 2006 through 2009 remain open
to examination by the taxing authorities in the United States,
United Kingdom and Canada.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2010, we
had approximately $0.9 million of accrued interest related
to uncertain tax positions which remained materially unchanged
from the prior year. The provision for unrecognized tax
benefits, including accrued interest, is included in income
taxes payable.
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Revenues Total revenues for the year ended
June 30, 2009 decreased $44.3 million, or 7.7% as
compared to the year ended June 30, 2008. The impact of
foreign currency accounted for a decrease of approximately
$67.2 million which was offset by new store openings and
acquisitions of approximately $36.3 million. On a constant
currency basis and after eliminating the impact of new stores
and acquisitions, total revenues decreased by $13.4 million
or 2.3%.
Relative to our products, consolidated check cashing revenue
decreased $32.0 million or 16.3% for the year ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in the prior
year. There was a decrease of $19.0 million related to
foreign exchange rates and increases from new stores and
acquisitions of $10.5 million. The remaining check cashing
revenues were down $23.5 million or 11.9% for the current
year, reflecting the effects of the global recession.
Eliminating the impacts of foreign exchange rates and new stores
and acquisitions, check cashing revenues from our
U.S. Retail business segment decreased 14.1%, while the
Canadian business declined 6.9% over the previous years
period. Similarly, check cashing fees in the United Kingdom
decreased 17.0% over the prior years period. On a
consolidated constant currency basis, the face amount of the
average check cashed increased 0.5% to $534 for the year ended
June 30, 2009 compared to $531 for the prior year period
while the average fee per check cashed remained consistent at
approximately $19.85. During fiscal 2009, global check counts
declined by approximately 6.6%.
Consolidated fees from consumer lending were $275.3 million
for the year ended June 30, 2009 compared to
$292.5 million for the year earlier period which is a
decrease of $17.2 million or 5.9%. The impact of foreign
currency fluctuations accounted for a decrease of approximately
$35.3 million that was partially offset by new stores and
acquisitions of $17.4 million. The remaining increase of
$0.7 million was primarily provided by our operations in
the United Kingdom which increased by 33.3% offset in part by
both the U.S. Retail and Canadian consumer lending
businesses, which decreased by 12.4% and 7.6%, respectively,
reflecting the effects of the global recession. The increase in
the United Kingdom is in part related to the strong growth in
that countrys pawn lending business, which is included as
pawn service fees and sales in the statement of
operations.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, money transfer fees
decreased in reported amounts by $0.7 million, when
adjusted for currency and excluding the impact from new stores
and acquisitions, increased by
43
$1.1 million or 4.1% for the year ended June 30, 2009
as compared to the year earlier period. On a constant currency
basis and excluding the impact from new stores and acquisitions,
other revenue, increased by $8.3 million, or 15.0% in the
current fiscal year, principally due to the success of the
foreign exchange product, the debit card business, gold sales
and other ancillary products.
Operating Expenses Operating expenses were
$346.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009
compared to $373.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2008, a decrease of $26.9 million or 7.2%. The impact of
foreign currency accounted for a decrease of approximately
$38.7 million which was partially offset by the impact
associated with the two acquisitions during the first half of
fiscal 2008 of approximately $16.1 million. On a constant
currency basis and after eliminating the impact of new stores
and acquisitions, operating expenses decreased by
$4.3 million. For the year ended June 30, 2009, total
operating expenses increased to 65.6% of total revenue compared
to 65.2% of total revenue for the year earlier period. After
adjusting for constant currency reporting and eliminating the
impact of new stores and acquisitions, the percentage of total
operating expenses as compared to total revenue increased from
the reported amount of 65.6% in fiscal 2008 to 66.0% for fiscal
2009.
Relative to our business units, after excluding the impacts of
foreign currency and acquisitions, U.S. Retail operating
expenses decreased by $20.5 million and Canadas
expenses remained relatively flat. The results in the United
States and Canada are consistent with the closure of
approximately 70 U.S. and Canadian stores that was
announced earlier in the year ended June 30, 2009. In
addition, there were an additional 60 U.S. stores that were
closed during June 2009. The adjusted operating expenses in the
United Kingdom were up approximately $16.0 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year. The
U.K. increase was primarily attributable to the categories of
salary and benefits, occupancy, loan loss provision,
depreciation and advertising which are all commensurate with
growth in that country.
Corporate Expenses Corporate expenses were
$68.2 million for fiscal 2009 compared to
$70.9 million for fiscal 2008, a decrease of
$2.7 million or 3.8%. On a constant currency basis,
corporate expenses increased by approximately $2.7 million.
The increase is primarily due to increased regulatory and
lobbying costs, increased investment in global management
capabilities, additional investment in infrastructure to support
our global de novo store growth, acquisitions strategy and
management and integration of recent acquisitions.
Other Depreciation and Amortization Other
depreciation and amortization expenses remained relatively
unchanged and were $3.8 million for fiscal 2009 and
$3.9 million for fiscal 2008.
Provision for Litigation
Settlements Provisions for legal settlement were
$57.9 million for fiscal 2009 compared to $0.3 million
in the prior year. The increase was almost solely driven as a
result of a fourth quarter charge of $57.4 million by our
Canadian subsidiary, Money Mart, on account of the Ontario class
action settlement and for the potential settlement of certain of
the similar class action proceedings pending in other Canadian
provinces.
Loss on Store Closings The Company recognized
loss on store closing expense of $10.3 million for the year
ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the year earlier period
amount of $1.0 million. Of the fiscal 2009 amount,
$7.2 million was recognized in the United States,
$$3.0 million in Canada and $0.2 million in the United
Kingdom. These expenses were related to the Companys
actions to close under-performing locations as well as closing
stores in states with uncertain or less favorable regulation or
that are located in areas where the Company had only a few
locations resulting in an inefficient cost infrastructure.
Unrealized Foreign Exchange Gain In May 2009,
we executed an early settlement of its U.K. cross currency
interest rate swaps that had been in place since December, 2006.
These cross currency interest rate swaps had the impact of
synthetically converting the foreign denominated debt into the
local currency of the United Kingdom at a fixed rate of
interest. As a result of that early settlement, the foreign
currency impacts associated with the bank debt outstanding in
both U.S. Dollars and Euros on the U.K.s balance
sheet is now recorded through our income statement
resulting in gain of $5.5 million for the year ended
June 30, 2009.
Interest Expense Interest expense was
$43.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009
compared to $44.4 million for the preceding year. On
June 27, 2007, we issued $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of the 2027 Notes in a private offering for
resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A under
44
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The proceeds from the
2027 Notes were initially invested until approximately
$131.4 million was utilized during fiscal 2008 for the
American Payday Loans and The Check Cashing Store acquisitions.
For the year ended June 30, 2009, there was an increase in
net interest expense of approximately $3.0 million
resulting from a decrease of interest income related to the
lower amount of short-term invested cash due to the
aforementioned fiscal 2008 acquisitions, as compared to the
prior year. This was offset by a decrease of approximately
$4.5 million in interest expense resulting primarily from
the impact of foreign currency translation of interest expense
in our Canadian and U.K. operations. With the early settlement
of the U.K.s cross-currency interest rate swaps that were
executed during the fourth quarter of this fiscal year, the
interest rate for our U.K. debt will now be recorded at the
variable interest rates provided for in the credit agreement.
Income Tax Provision The provision for income
taxes was $15.0 million for fiscal 2009 compared to a
provision of $36.0 million for fiscal 2008. Our effective
tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 183.2%, which is a combination of
an effective rate of 106.4% on continuing operations and other
one-time charges reduced by the impact of a favorable settlement
granted in a competent authority tax proceeding between the
United States and Canadian tax authorities related to
transfers pricing matters for years 2000 through 2003, the
import of the convertible debt discount and an adjustment to our
reserve for uncertain tax benefits related to years for which a
settlement has not yet been received. The impact to our fiscal
2009 provision for income taxes related to these two items was
$2.9 million. Our effective tax rate differs from the
statutory rate of 35% due to foreign taxes, permanent
differences and a valuation allowance on U.S. and foreign
deferred tax assets and the aforementioned changes to our
reserve for uncertain tax positions. The principal reason for
the significant difference in the effective tax rate between
periods was the $57.4 million charge to earnings in
connection with the pending Ontario settlement and for the
potential settlement of certain of the similar class action
proceedings pending in other Canadian provinces. This charge
caused a significant reduction in pre-tax income resulting in a
material difference in the effective tax rate on continuing
operations for fiscal 2009. Without the provision for legal
settlements, the impact of the convertible debt discount and
Competent Authority settlement the effective tax rate for fiscal
2009 would have been 48.6%.
The Company believes that its ability to utilize
pre-2007 net operating losses in a given year will be
limited to $9.0 million under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code, which we refer to as the Code, because of
changes of ownership resulting from our June 2006 follow-on
equity offering. In addition, any future debt or equity
transactions may reduce our net operating losses or further
limit our ability to utilize the net operating losses under the
Code. The deferred tax asset related to excess foreign tax
credits is also fully offset by a valuation allowance of
$45.6 million. Additionally, we maintain foreign deferred
tax assets in the amount of $28.4 million. Of this amount
$1.3 million was recorded by our Canadian affiliate during
fiscal 2007 related to a foreign currency loss sustained in
connection with the hedge of its term loan. This deferred tax
asset was offset by a full valuation allowance of
$1.3 million since the foreign currency loss is capital in
nature and at this time we have not identified any potential for
capital gains against which to offset the loss.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2009, we
had approximately $0.5 million of accrued interest related
to uncertain tax positions which remained materially unchanged
from the prior year. The provision for unrecognized tax
benefits, including accrued interest, is included in income
taxes payable.
45
Fiscal
2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Inc/Dec -
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Thousands of US$
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Retail
|
|
$
|
127,754
|
|
|
$
|
152,870
|
|
|
|
−16.4
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.1 pts.
|
|
DFS
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
65.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.0 pts.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
276,820
|
|
|
|
236,267
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.7 pts.
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
184,039
|
|
|
|
136,728
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.2 pts.
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,619
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
283.2
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
−20.9
|
%
|
|
|
−96.8
|
%
|
|
|
75.9 pts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
610,927
|
|
|
$
|
527,853
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
$
|
246,340
|
|
|
$
|
181,804
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin %
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.9 pts.
|
|
The following table represents each reportable segments
revenue as a percentage of total segment revenue and each
reportable segments pre-tax income as a percentage of
total segment pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States Retail
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
−19.5
|
%
|
DFS
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
45.3
|
%
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
57.9
|
%(1)
|
|
|
96.1
|
%(3)
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
59.7
|
%(2)
|
|
|
51.0
|
%(4)
|
Other
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
−26.6
|
%
|
|
|
−27.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $22.6 million in provisions for litigation
settlements, $12.2 million of loss on derivatives,
$3.6 million in loss on extinguishment of debt and
$2.2 million of unrealized foreign exchange loss. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes $8.1 million of unrealized foreign exchange loss
and $4.7 million in loss on extinguishment of debt. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes $57.5 million in provisions for litigation
settlements. |
|
(4) |
|
Excludes $5.5 million of unrealized foreign exchange gain. |
United
States Retail
Total U.S. Retail revenues were $127.8 million for the
year ended June 30, 2010 compared to $152.9 million
for the year ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of
$25.1 million or 16.4%. The Company closed 114
under-performing U.S. stores during fiscal year 2009 and
significantly reduced the related field management and store
support functions. The closure of these locations was the
primary factor in the
period-over-period
decrease. From a product perspective, this decline is primarily
related to decreases of $9.9 million and $13.9 million
in check cashing and consumer lending revenue, respectively. The
economic downturn contributed to the decrease in check cashing
revenue, as there were decreases in both the number of checks as
46
well as the face amount of checks that were presented in the
United States. The number of checks decreased year over year by
approximately 784 thousand with a corresponding decrease in face
value of approximately $361.9 million primarily related to
the closure of 114 U.S. stores during fiscal 2009 and the
economic downturn. The face amount of the average check cashed
by the Company decreased by 0.4%, and the average fee per
transaction increased from $13.59 to $13.81.
The continued high rate of unemployment through all sectors of
the U.S. economy negatively impacts consumer lending
volumes. Despite the initial signs of economic improvement, the
Company has continued to take a more cautious approach to
lending in all of our segments, including United States Retail.
U.S. Retail funded loan originations decreased 14.0% or
$81.7 million, for the year ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to the year ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to
the closure of 114 stores in fiscal 2009.
Operating margins in United States Retail increased to 21.2% for
the year ended June 30, 2010 compared to 15.1% for the
prior year. The U.S. Retail operating margins are
significantly lower than the other segments. The primary drivers
for this disparity are greater competition in the United States,
which effects revenue per store, higher U.S. salary costs,
somewhat higher occupancy costs and marginally higher loan loss
provisions. The closure of 60 underperforming stores during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 is consistent with the
Companys U.S. Retail strategy of closing unprofitable
locations and focusing on states with more favorable and stable
regulatory environments. This action has shown to be positive,
resulting in improved
year-over-year
operating margins.
U.S. Retail pre-tax profit was $2.3 million for the
year ended June 30, 2010 compared to a pre-tax loss of
$11.8 million for the prior year. The improvement was the
result of $3.9 million in increased operating profits,
lower store closure costs by $5.0 million and a reduction
in net corporate expenses of $4.8 million.
Dealers
Financial Services (DFS)
We acquired Dealers Financial Services, LLC on
December 23, 2009 and therefore the Companys
consolidated results for the year ended June 30, 2010
include 189 days of DFS results. DFS provides fee based
services to enlisted military personnel seeking to purchase new
and used vehicles. DFSs revenue comes from fees which are
paid by a third-party national bank and fees from the sale of
ancillary products such as service contracts and guaranteed
asset protection (GAP insurance). DFS operates through an
established network of arrangements with approximately 600 new
and used car dealerships (both franchised and independent),
according to underwriting protocols specified by the third-party
national bank. DFS operating expenses are primarily
compensation/benefits, amortization of its identifiable
intangible assets, professional service fees and field
management expenses. Since the DFS business model is based on
receiving fees for services, it is unlike the Companys
store-based businesses and will be reported as a stand-alone
segment.
Canada
Total Canadian revenues were $276.8 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010, an increase of 17.2%, or
$40.6 million as compared to the year ended June 30,
2009. The impact of foreign currency rates accounted for
$25.7 million of this increase. On a constant currency
basis, revenues increased by $14.9 million. On a constant
currency basis, check cashing revenues were down
$4.6 million in Canada with the effects of higher
unemployment resulting in decreases in the number of checks and
the total value of checks cashed - down by 11.0% and
10.7%, respectively. The average face amount per check increased
marginally from $491.03 for the year ended June 30, 2009 to
$492.80 for the current year, while the average fee per check
increased by 4.9% for the year ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to the year ended June 30, 2009. Consumer lending
revenues in Canada increased by $12.8 million or 10.5% (on
a constant currency basis) for the year ended June 30, 2010
as compared to the prior year.
Operating expenses in Canada increased $9.7 million or 7.3%
from $132.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009
to $141.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2010.
The impacts of changes in foreign currency rates resulted in an
increase of $13.5 million. The constant currency decrease
of approximately $3.8 million is primarily related to
decreases in provision for loan losses and returned check
expenses, offset in part by increased expenses in advertising in
relation to the new regulatory environment in Canada and a
slight increase
47
in salaries and benefits costs. On a constant currency basis,
provision for loan losses, as a percentage of loan revenues
decreased by 8.4 pts from 19.1% to 10.7%. Overall Canadas
operating margin percentage increased from 44.1% for the year
ended June 30, 2009 to 48.8% for the year ended
June 30, 2010. The solid improvement in this area is the
result of increased consumer lending revenues and lower consumer
lending losses, in addition to efforts to reduce costs and
promote efficiencies. To date, provinces which comprise more
than 95% of our Canadian company-operated store base have all
announced maximum lending rates that are above our existing
price structure, but generally below the pricing of many
competitors. As a result, we have resumed our television
advertising campaign in certain Canadian provinces and are
beginning to experience an increase in the number of new
customers conducting transactions in our Canadian stores.
The Canadian pre-tax income was $3.7 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 compared to pre-tax income of
$5.8 million for the prior year, a decrease of
$2.1 million. On a constant currency basis, pre-tax income
was $6.7 million or an increase of approximately
$1.0 million. On a constant currency basis, the positive
impacts of increased operating margins of $18.7 million and
lower litigation reserve provisions of $39.3 were principally
offset by increased net corporate expenses of
$13.2 million, additional interest expense of
$25.8 million and $17.5 million of expenses related to
the extinguishment of debt, non-cash valuation loss on the cross
currency interest rate swaps and foreign exchange losses related
to the Companys senior notes.
United
Kingdom
Total U.K. revenues were $184.0 million for the year ended
June 30, 2010 compared to $136.7 million for the year
earlier period, an increase of $47.3 million or 34.6%. On a
constant currency basis and excluding the impact of acquisitions
in the current fiscal year, U.K.
year-over-year
revenues have increased by $4.6 million, or 3.4%. In
addition, on a constant currency basis and excluding the impact
of acquisitions in the current and previous fiscal year, organic
revenues increased by $8.5 million, or 7.0%. Consumer
lending, pawn service fees and other revenues (gold scrap sales,
foreign exchange products and debit cards) were up by
$3.6 million, $2.7 million and $6.7 million,
respectively. As in the U.S. Retail and Canadian business
segments, U.K. check cashing revenues was impacted by the
recession and the gradual migration away from paper checks,
decreased by approximately $8.4 million, or 20.7% (also on
a constant currency basis and excluding new stores and
acquisitions).
U.K. operating expenses increased by $27.5 million, or
34.2% from $80.4 million for the year ended June 30,
2009 as compared to $107.8 million for the current year. On
a constant currency basis and excluding new stores and
acquisitions, U.K. operating expenses decreased by
$5.4 million or 6.7%. The decrease is consistent with the
Companys overall cost reduction focus. There was an
increase of 5.3 pts relating to the provision for loan losses as
a percentage of loan revenues primarily due to the mix of
lending products including the Internet-based lending business
acquired in April 2009. On a constant currency basis, the loan
loss rate for the year ended June 30, 2009 was 12.4% while
for the current year, the rate increased to 17.7%. On a constant
currency basis, the U.K. operating margin percentage has
improved from 41.2% for the year ended June 30, 2009 to
41.5% for the current year due to the strong revenue growth
offset in part with a marginal increase in costs.
The U.K. pre-tax income was $33.8 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $36.4 million for the
prior year, a decrease of $2.6 million on a
constant currency basis, the decrease was $2.1 million. In
addition to increased operating margins of $19.9 million
and a reduction in interest expense of $3.1 million,
pre-tax income was negatively impacted by expenses related to
the Companys recent refinancing efforts of
$4.7 million, increased net corporate expenses of
$4.8 million and a net change of $16.3 million in
realized/unrealized foreign exchange losses prior
fiscal year had $7.4 million of gains and current fiscal
year results include losses of $8.9 million.
48
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Inc/Dec -
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Thousands of US$
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Retail
|
|
$
|
152,870
|
|
|
$
|
150,907
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.8 pts.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
236,267
|
|
|
|
279,491
|
|
|
|
−15.5
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
(1.8) pts.
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
136,728
|
|
|
|
138,962
|
|
|
|
−1.6
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.3 pts.
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
−29.6
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
−96.8
|
%
|
|
|
−52.7
|
%
|
|
|
44.1 pts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
527,853
|
|
|
$
|
572,184
|
|
|
|
−7.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
$
|
181,804
|
|
|
$
|
199,230
|
|
|
|
−8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin %
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.8
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4) pts.
|
|
The following table represents each reportable segments
revenue as a percentage of total segment revenue and each
reportable segments pre-tax income as a percentage of
total segment pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Income
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States Retail
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
−19.5
|
%
|
|
|
−6.5
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%(1)
|
|
|
86.6
|
%
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
51.0
|
%(2)
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
−27.6
|
%
|
|
|
−8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $57.5 million of provision for legal settlements. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes $5.5 million unrealized foreign exchange gain. |
United
States Retail
Total U.S. Retail revenues were $152.8 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009 compared to $150.9 million
for the year ended June 30, 2008, an increase of 1.3%.
Excluding the impacts of acquisitions and new store activity,
U.S. Retail revenues decreased by $20.0 million. This
decline is primarily related to decreases of $8.1 million
and $9.9 million in check cashing and consumer lending
revenue, respectively. Excluding acquisition-related impacts,
the face value of checks cashed and the number of checks cashed
was down 17.3% and 21.9%, respectively. In addition to a general
decrease in our U.S. Retail check cashing business and the
continuing effects of the recession, the closure of 54 stores in
the first quarter of the current fiscal year also negatively
impacted U.S. Retail check cashing revenues on a year over
year basis. However, as a result of the closure of these
unprofitable stores, we increased our overall U.S. Retail
margins. Check cashing revenues as reported are also lower as a
result of lower average fees per check associated with the CCS
operations acquired during December of 2007.
Increasing unemployment through all sectors of the
U.S. economy in fiscal 2009 negatively impacted consumer
lending volumes. As a result of current economic conditions, we
took a more cautious approach to lending in all of our segments,
including United States Retail. Additionally, the closure of
underperforming stores during the first quarter of the fiscal
2009 contributed to lower
year-over-year
lending volumes. Lastly,
49
excluding the impacts of acquisitions, U.S. funded loan
originations decreased 14.8% or $51.5 million in fiscal
2009 as compared to the year earlier period.
Operating expenses in United States Retail decreased by
$4.5 million, or 3.2%, from fiscal year 2008 as compared to
fiscal 2009. Excluding the impacts of acquisitions,
U.S. Retail operating expenses decreased by approximately
$20.6 million. The decrease was due primarily to the
closure of 54 underperforming stores and the Companys
efforts in the area of expense control. Further, the
U.S. Retail provision for loan losses as a percentage of
loan revenues decreased by 5.0 pts from 31.2% for the year ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to 26.2% for the 2009 fiscal year
due to improved collections and a tightening of our lending
criteria.
Operating margins in United States Retail increased to 13.7% for
the year ended June 30, 2009 compared to 10.1% for the
prior fiscal year. U.S. Retail operating margins are
significantly lower than the other segments. The primary drivers
for this disparity are higher U.S. salary costs, somewhat
higher occupancy costs and higher loan loss provisions.
Management addressed the lower U.S. Retail margins, with
the closure of 114 underperforming stores during the 2009
fiscal year. It is anticipated that the closure of these mostly
underperforming stores will be accretive to earnings.
The U.S. Retail pre-tax loss was $11.8 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009 compared to a pre-tax loss of
$5.1 million for the same period in the prior year. The
$6.7 million decline for fiscal 2009 can be primarily
attributed to additional costs related to the closure of
approximately 114 underperforming stores during the 2009 fiscal
year.
Canada
Total Canadian revenues were $236.3 million for the year
ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of 15.5% or
$43.2 million as compared to the year earlier period. The
impact of foreign currency rates accounted for
$34.4 million of this decrease offset by $5.5 million
of acquisitions and new stores. In constant currency and
excluding the impacts of acquisitions and new stores, the net
decrease of Canadian revenues from fiscal year 2008 compared to
the 2009 fiscal year is $14.3 million and was impacted by
the recession in 2009. Constant currency decreases of
$5.6 million in check cashing revenues and
$11.3 million in consumer lending revenues were offset by
increases of $0.8 million in money transfer fees and
$1.8 million in other revenues. On a constant currency
basis, check cashing revenues in Canada were impacted by the
recession and decreases in the number of checks and the face
value of checks - down by 11.6% and 8.1%,
respectively. The average face amount per check increased by
3.9%, while the average fee per check increased by 7.2% for the
year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the year ended
June 30, 2008.
The decrease in Canadian consumer lending revenue is consistent
with some of the same factors that were mentioned in relation to
the U.S. Retail business, regarding the effects of the
global recession on the Canadian economy and employment. In
addition, our Canadian subsidiary diminished the scale and tone
of its Canadian marketing and advertising campaigns, as many of
the Canadian provinces were actively engaged in formulating
and/or
instituting their respective consumer lending regulations and
rate structures. Accordingly, as expected, new customer growth
in Canada softened. On a constant currency basis, company funded
loan originations in Canada decreased $64.5 million or 6.8%
in fiscal 2009 as compared to the fiscal year 2008.
Operating expenses in Canada decreased $19.3 million or
12.8% from $151.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2008 to $132.0 million in fiscal 2009. The entire decrease
is related to the impacts of changes in foreign currency rates.
On a constant currency basis, provision for loan losses, as a
percentage of loan revenues, increased modestly by 0.8 pts from
18.4% to 19.2%. Overall Canadas operating margin
percentage decreased from 45.9% to 44.0%. The decrease in
operating margin percentage is primarily due to lower revenues
offset in part by lower expenses through continued focus on our
cost controls.
The Canadian pre-tax income was $0.8 million for the year
ended June 30, 2009 compared to pre-tax income of
$68.7 million for the same period in the prior year or a
$67.9 million decline
year-over-year.
On a constant currency basis, pre-tax income decreased
$66.3 million. The primary reason for the large decrease in
pre-tax income was the $57.4 million expense related to the
then pending, class action settlement and for the potential
settlement of certain of the similar class action proceedings
pending in the other Canadian provinces.
50
Other factors impacting the Canadian pre-tax income were lower
operating margins and expenses related to the closure of
approximately 20 under-performing locations. These additional
expenses were primarily offset by lower corporate-related
expenses, lower net interest expense and the benefit from an
exercise of its
in-the-money
puts which are designated as cash flow hedges as well as gains
from the revaluation of foreign currencies related to its
foreign exchange product. The balance of the increase relates to
a transfer pricing adjustment in the prior year.
United
Kingdom
Total U.K. revenues were $136.7 million for the year ended
June 30, 2009 compared to $139.0 million for the year
earlier period, a decrease of $2.3 million. The current
year results were impacted by foreign currency translation
decreases of $32.8 million offset by revenue from
acquisitions and new stores of $9.7 million. On a constant
currency basis and excluding the impact of acquisitions and new
stores, the U.K.s revenues increased by $20.9 million
or 15.0%. U.K. revenues exhibited growth in consumer lending and
other revenues (pawn broking, gold scrap sales and foreign
exchange products). As in the U.S. Retail and Canadian
business segments, U.K. check cashing revenues on a
constant currency basis and excluding acquisitions and new
stores decreased by approximately $9.8 million,
or 17.0%. The U.K. recession and rising unemployment and the
shrinking construction industry in the London area, principally
due to the slower housing market, were the primary drivers of
the decreased check cashing fees in the United Kingdom.
The U.K. business showed strong growth in both consumer lending
and other revenues. On a constant currency basis and excluding
the impacts of acquisitions and new stores, consumer lending
revenues increased by $21.8 million or 33.3% and other
revenues increased by $8.0 million or 74.9%. The increase
in other revenues is principally due to the success of the
foreign exchange product, the debit card business, gold sales
and other ancillary products. On a constant currency basis, U.K.
loan originations for the current quarter increased by
$122.5 million or 33.9%. Consumer lending in the U.K.
continues to benefit from a growing market for its loan
products, in addition to strong growth in the pawn business,
which primarily consists of loans on collateralized gold jewelry.
Operating expenses in the United Kingdom decreased by
$3.1 million, or 3.7% from $83.5 million for the year
ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $80.3 million for
the 2009 fiscal year. Excluding the impacts of changes in
foreign currency translation rates, U.K. store and regional
expenses increased by $16.0 million. The primary factors in
the increased expenses were in the areas of salary/benefits,
occupancy and depreciation all areas that are
consistent with an operation that is in a growth mode and has
added approximately 25 new stores through either acquisition or
de novo store builds. There was an increase of 1.0 pt relating
to the provision for loan losses as a percentage of loan
revenues. On a constant currency basis, the rate for the year
ended June 30, 2008 was 9.9% while for the current fiscal
year, the rate has increased to 10.9%. On a constant currency
basis, U.K. operating margin percentage has improved from 39.9%
for the year earlier period to 41.3% for fiscal 2009 ended
June 30, 2009 due to the strong revenue growth offset in
part with a marginal increase in costs.
The U.K. pre-tax income was $36.4 million for the year
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $22.7 million for the
same period in the prior year or an increase of
$13.7 million. On a constant currency basis the increase
year-over-year
was $22.8 million. In addition to the aforementioned
increase in operating margins, the U.K. business benefited from
the exercise of its
in-the-money
put options which are designated as cash flow hedges.
Furthermore, the unrealized gain of its term loans which are not
denominated in GBP and the revaluation of foreign currencies
held in U.K. stores for its foreign currency exchange product
contributed to the balance of the increase.
Balance
Sheet Variations
June 30,
2010 compared to June 30, 2009
The Companys cash balances increased from
$209.6 million at June 30, 2009 to $291.3 million
at June 30, 2010 primarily as the result of excess cash
generated from the Companys December 2009 refinancing
activities.
51
Loans receivable, net increased by $23.6 million to
$138.3 million at June 30, 2010 from
$114.7 million at June 30, 2009. Loans receivable,
gross increased by $28.3 million and the related allowance
for loan losses increased by $4.7 million. The U.K.,
Canadian and Poland business units showed increases in their
loan receivable balances of $20.2 million,
$4.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The
significant increase in the U.K. receivable balance was
primarily related to the Internet loan business as well as the
recently acquired S&R business. The U.S. Retail
business had a decrease of $1.1 million. In constant
dollars, the allowance for loan losses increased by
$5.7 million and increased to 11.0% of the outstanding
principal balance at June 30, 2010 as compared to 9.6% at
June 30, 2009. The following factors impacted this area:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued improvements in U.S. collections and our actions,
taken in an effort to decrease our risk exposure by reducing the
amount that we are willing to loan to certain customer segments.
The historical loss rates (expressed as a percentage of loan
amounts originated for the last twelve months applied against
the principal balance of outstanding loans) have continued to
decline. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses related to
U.S. short-term consumer loans decreased by 9.7% from 4.6%
at June 30, 2009 compared to 4.1% at June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
In constant currency, the Canadian ratio of allowance for loan
losses as a percentage of loans outstanding has decreased from
3.3% at June 30, 2009 to 2.7% at June 30, 2010. The
Loans receivable, net continues to show improvement with the
loan loss reserve as a percentage of outstanding principle
dropping from 2.9% at June 30, 2009 to 1.9% at
June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
In constant currency, the U.K.s allowance for loan losses
decreased from approximately 8.5% of outstanding principal at
June 30, 2009 to 6.4% at June 30, 2010. A significant
factor in this improvement is the increasing pawn receivable
balances which carry a much lower loan loss reserve percentage.
|
|
|
|
The impact of a larger loan portfolio in Poland, which carries a
higher loan loss reserve percentage than our single payment CTP
portfolio, impacted the overall loan loss reserve as a
percentage of gross loans receivable.
|
Other receivables increased by $10.0 million from
$7.3 million at June 30, 2009 to $17.3 million at
June 30, 2010. The Companys recent acquisitions
accounted for $5.7 million of the increase. The remaining
increase was primarily related to the timing of settlements with
vendors associated with our money order business and foreign
currency translation impacts.
Goodwill and other intangibles increased $154.7 million,
from $454.3 million at June 30, 2009 to
$609.0 million at June 30, 2010, due to
$150.0 million of additional goodwill and intangibles
associated with acquisitions during the current fiscal year and
foreign currency translation impacts of approximately
$7.9 million, partially offset by amortization of
$3.2 million.
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization increased
from $9.9 million at June 30, 2009 to
$18.7 million at June 30, 2010 in connection with the
Companys refinancing activities in December 2009.
Accounts Payable increased $8.6 million from
$36.3 million at June 30, 2009 to $44.9 million
at June 30, 2010 due primarily to timing of settlements
with vendors and an accrual of an earn-out payment related to
the Express Finance acquisition.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased
$22.0 million from $70.6 million at June 30, 2009
to $92.6 million at June 30, 2010 due primarily to a
$10.9 million increase in accrued payroll, increases in
accrued interest expense of $3.2 million and an increase of
$2.9 million to legal settlement reserves. Foreign currency
translation adjustments also accounted for approximately
$3.2 million of the increase.
The fair value of derivatives increased from a liability
position of $10.2 million at June 30, 2009 to a
liability of $47.4 million as of June 30, 2010, a
change of $37.2 million. The change in the fair value of
these cross-currency interest rate swaps are a result of the
change in the foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates
related to the legacy tranche of 2006 Canadian term loans.
52
Other long-term liabilities increased $27.1 million
primarily due to accrued legal settlement reserves related to
the Canadian provinces class action litigation.
Long-term debt increased by $194.9 million from
$530.4 million at June 30, 2009 to $725.3 million
at June 30, 2010 as the result of the Companys
refinancing activities in December 2009.
Changes
in Financial Condition
On a constant currency basis, cash and cash equivalent balances
and the revolving credit facilities balances fluctuate
significantly as a result of seasonal, intra-month and
day-to-day
requirements for funding check cashing and other operating
activities. For the year ended June 30, 2010, cash and cash
equivalents increased $81.7 million which is net of a
$9.6 million increase as a result of the effect of exchange
rate changes on foreign cash and cash equivalents. However, as
these foreign cash accounts are maintained in Canada and the
U.K. in local currency, there is little, if any, actual
diminution in value from changes in currency rates, and as a
result, the cash balances are available on a local currency
basis to fund the daily operations of the U.K. and Canadian
business units.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been from operations,
borrowings under our credit facilities and issuance of debt
securities. We anticipate that our primary uses of cash will be
to provide working capital, finance capital expenditures, meet
debt service requirements, fund company originated consumer
loans, finance store expansion, finance acquisitions and finance
the expansion of our products and services.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $80.8 million
for fiscal 2008, $59.2 million in fiscal 2009 and
$86.7 million for fiscal 2010. The increase in net cash
provided by operations was primarily the result of strong
operating results, the impact of foreign exchange rates on
translated net income and timing differences in payments to
third party vendors.
Net cash used in investing activities was $167.0 million in
fiscal 2008, $42.0 million in fiscal 2009 and
$184.4 million in fiscal 2010. Our investing activities
primarily related to acquisitions, purchases of property and
equipment for our stores and investments in technology. The
actual amount of capital expenditures each year depends in part
upon the number of new stores opened or acquired and the number
of stores remodeled. For fiscal 2008, we made capital
expenditures of $23.5 million and acquisitions of
$143.4 million compared to capital expenditures of
$15.7 million and acquisitions of $26.2 million in
fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2010, we made capital expenditures of
$29.4 million and acquisitions of $155.1 million. The
actual amount of capital expenditures each year will depend in
part upon the number of new stores opened or acquired and the
number of stores remodeled.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.3 million
for fiscal 2008 compared to net cash provided by financing
activities of $2.7 million for fiscal 2009 and
$169.8 million in fiscal 2010. The cash provided by
financing activities during fiscal 2010 was primarily a result
of $596.4 million in proceeds from the 10.375% Senior
Notes due 2016, in part offset by a repayment of our term debt
in the amount of $369.2 million, $32.0 million for the
repurchase of 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027 and
payment of debt issuance costs of $19.8 million. The cash
provided by financing activities during fiscal 2009 was
primarily a result of the proceeds from termination of the U.K.
cross currency swaps of $14.4 million and $3.3 million
proceeds from the exercise of stock options. This was partially
offset by $7.4 million in debt payments of and
$7.5 million for stock repurchased in fiscal 2009. The cash
provided by financing activities during fiscal 2008 was
primarily a result of the use of the overdraft facility in the
United Kingdom in the amount of $5.3 million, proceeds from
of the exercise of stock options of $1.1 million and
$1.0 million due to the decrease of restricted cash. This
was partially offset by scheduled principal payments on our
legacy long term debt obligations which totaled
$6.5 million.
Senior Secured Credit Facility On
December 23, 2009, we amended and restated our senior
credit facility and repaid a substantial portion of our term
indebtedness thereunder. Subsequently, in June 2010, we repaid
all of the remaining outstanding legacy term indebtedness under
our credit facility. Our revolving credit
53
facility contains certain financial and other restrictive
covenants, which among other things, requires us to achieve
certain financial ratios, limits capital expenditures, restricts
the magnitude of payment of dividends and obtain certain
approvals if we want to increase borrowings. As of June 30,
2010, we are in compliance with all such covenants.
After giving effect to such amendments and prepayments, our
senior credit facility is comprised of a $75.0 million
revolving loan facility to which Dollar Financial Group, Inc,
our U.S. subsidiary, would be the borrower, which we refer
to as the U.S. Revolving Loan, and a CAD 28.5 million
revolving loan facility, to which National Money Mart Company,
our Canadian operating subsidiary would be the borrower, which
we refer to as the Canadian Revolving Loan.
A portion of the U.S. Revolving Loan ($7.5 million)
terminates on October 30, 2011, and the remainder
($67.5 million) will terminate on December 31, 2014.
The portion of the U.S. Revolving Loan that expires on
October 30, 2011 bears an interest rate of LIBOR (but not
less than 2%) plus 375 basis points, subject to reductions
as we reduce our leverage. The portion that expires on
December 31, 2014 bears an interest rate of LIBOR (but not
less than 2%) plus 500 basis points, subject to reductions
as we reduce our leverage. The U.S. Revolving Loan may be
subject to mandatory reduction and to mandatory prepayment,
principally in an amount equal to 50% of excess cash flow (as
defined in the credit agreement). Our borrowing capacity under
the U.S. Revolving Loan is limited to the lesser of the
total commitment of $75.0 million or 85% of certain
domestic liquid assets plus $30.0 million. Up to
$30.0 million may be used in connection with letters of
credit. At June 30, 2010, our borrowing capacity under the
U.S. Revolving Loan was $65.4 million. There was no
indebtedness outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Loan as
of June 30, 2010 and $13.6 million outstanding in
letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. which
guarantee the performance of certain of our contractual
obligations.
A portion of the Canadian Revolving Loan (CAD 2.7 million)
terminates on October 30, 2011, and the remainder (CAD
25.8 million) will terminate on December 31, 2014. The
portion that expires on October 30, 2011 bears an interest
rate of CDOR (but not less than 2%) plus 375 basis points,
subject to reductions as we reduce our leverage. The portion
that expires on December 31, 2014 bears an interest rate of
CDOR (but not less than 2%) plus 500 basis points, subject
to reductions as we reduce our leverage. The facility may be
subject to mandatory reduction and mandatory prepayment,
principally in an amount equal to 50% of excess cash flow (as
defined in the credit agreement). Our borrowing capacity under
the Canadian Revolving Loan is limited to the lesser of the
total commitment of CAD 28.5 million or 85% of certain
combined liquid assets of our Canadian and United Kingdom
subsidiaries, National Money Mart Company and Dollar Financial
U.K. Limited, and their respective subsidiaries. At
June 30, 2010, the borrowing capacity was CAD
28.5 million. There was no outstanding indebtedness under
the Canadian Revolving Loan at June 30, 2010.
United Kingdom Overdraft Facility In the third
quarter of fiscal 2008, our U.K subsidiary entered into an
overdraft facility which provides for a commitment of up to GBP
5.0 million. There was no outstanding indebtedness under
the United Kingdom facility at June 30, 2010. We have the
right of offset under the overdraft facility, by which we net
our cash bank accounts with our lender and the balance on the
overdraft facility. Amounts outstanding under the United Kingdom
overdraft facility bear interest at a rate of the Bank Base Rate
(0.5% at June 30, 2010) plus 2.0%. Interest accrues on
the net amount of the overdraft facility and the cash balance.
Long-Term Debt As of June 30, 2010, our
long term debt consisted of $596.7 million of
10.375% senior notes due 2016, which we refer to as the
2016 notes, issued by our Canadian subsidiary, National Money
Mart Company, $38.3 million of our 2.875% convertible notes
due 2027, which we refer to as the 2027 notes,
$84.9 million of our 3.00% convertible notes due 2028,
which we refer to as the 2028 notes and $5.4 million of
term loan owed by the recently acquired pawn business by our
U.K. subsidiary in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Through a series of privately negotiated transactions with
certain holders of our 2027 notes in December 2009,
pursuant to which such the holders exchanged an aggregate of
$120.0 million principal amount of the 2027 notes held by
such holders for an equal aggregate principal amount of our new
2028 notes. Holders have the right to convert the 2028 notes
into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common
54
stock upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. The initial
conversion rate of the 2028 notes is 34.5352 per $1,000
principal amount of 2028 notes (equivalent to an initial
conversion price of approximately $28.956 per share). The
2028 notes accrue interest at a rate of 3.00% per annum and
mature on April 1, 2028.
In February 2010, we repurchased $35.2 million aggregate
principal amount of our 2027 notes in privately negotiated
transactions with three of the holders of the 2027 notes. The
purchase price paid was 91% of the stated principal amount of
the repurchased 2027 notes for an aggregate price of
$32.0 million.
On December 23, 2009, our Canadian subsidiary, National
Money Mart Company, sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, $600 million aggregate
principal amount of the 2016 notes. The 2016 notes will mature
on December 15, 2016.
Operating Leases. Operating leases are
scheduled payments on existing store and other administrative
leases. These leases typically have initial terms of five years
and may contain provisions for renewal options, additional
rental charges based on revenue and payment of real estate taxes
and common area charges.
We entered into the commitments described above and other
contractual obligations in the ordinary course of business as a
source of funds for asset growth and asset/liability management
and to meet required capital needs. Our principal future
obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2010, excluding
periodic interest payments, include the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.375% Senior Notes due 2016
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027
|
|
|
44,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,800
|
|
3.0% Senior Convertible Notes due 2028
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Other Notes Payable
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
5,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under Canadian Class Action Settlement Agreements
Payable in Cash
|
|
|
32,283
|
|
|
|
25,211
|
|
|
|
7,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
154,046
|
|
|
|
36,734
|
|
|
|
54,259
|
|
|
|
32,532
|
|
|
|
30,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
959,830
|
|
|
$
|
65,228
|
|
|
$
|
66,749
|
|
|
$
|
32,532
|
|
|
$
|
795,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that, based on current levels of operations and
anticipated improvements in operating results, cash flows from
operations and borrowings available under our credit facilities
will allow us to fund our liquidity and capital expenditure
requirements for the foreseeable future, build de novo stores
and effectuate various acquisitions and make payment of interest
and principal on our indebtedness. This belief is based upon our
historical growth rate and the anticipated benefits we expect
from operating efficiencies. We also expect operating expenses
to increase, although the rate of increase is expected to be
less than the rate of revenue growth for existing stores.
Furthermore, we do not believe that additional acquisitions or
expansion are necessary to cover our fixed expenses, including
debt service.
Impact of
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has a material impact on our
earnings from operations.
Impact of
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There are no material recently issued accounting pronouncements
that we have not yet adopted.
55
|
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Generally
In the operations of our subsidiaries and the reporting of our
consolidated financial results, we are affected by changes in
interest rates and currency translation exchange rates. The
principal risks of loss arising from adverse changes in market
rates and prices to which we and our subsidiaries are exposed
relate to:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rates on revolving credit facilities; and
|
|
|
|
foreign exchange rates generating translation gains and losses.
|
We and our subsidiaries have no market risk sensitive
instruments entered into for trading purposes, as defined by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP.
Information contained in this section relates only to
instruments entered into for purposes other than trading.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our outstanding indebtedness, and related interest rate risk, is
managed centrally by our finance department by implementing the
financing strategies approved by our Board of Directors. Our
revolving credit facilities carry variable rates of interest.
With the repayment of its legacy variable rate term credit
facilities during fiscal 2010 with the proceeds of a fixed rate
bond issuance without termination of its Canadian cross currency
swaps hedging the debt, we are exposed to adverse changes in
interest rates through the swap that will likely have an impact
on our future consolidated statement of financial position. See
the section entitled Cross Currency Interest Rate
Swaps.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Put
Options
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada have exposed us to
shifts in currency valuations. From time to time, we may elect
to purchase put options in order to protect certain earnings in
the United Kingdom and Canada against the translational impact
of foreign currency fluctuations. Out of the money put options
may be purchased because they cost less than completely averting
risk, and the maximum downside is limited to the difference
between the strike price and exchange rate at the date of
purchase and the price of the contracts. At June 30, 2010,
we did not hold any put options. At times throughout the year we
used purchased options designated as cash flow hedges to protect
against certain of the foreign currency exchange rate risks
inherent in our forecasted earnings denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. These cash flow hedges have a
duration of less than 12 months. For derivative instruments
that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the
effective portions of the gain or loss on the derivative
instrument are initially recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income as a separate component of
stockholders equity and subsequently reclassified into
earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or
loss is reported in other expense (income), net on the statement
of operations. For options designated as hedges, hedge
effectiveness is measured by comparing the cumulative change in
the hedge contract with the cumulative change in the hedged
item, both of which are based on forward rates. As of
June 30, 2010, no amounts were excluded from the assessment
of hedge effectiveness. There was no ineffectiveness from these
cash flow hedges for fiscal 2010.
Canadian operations (exclusive of unrealized foreign exchange
losses of $2.2 million, loss on extinguishment of debt of
$3.6 million, litigation expense of $22.6 million,
loss on derivatives not designated as hedges of
$12.9 million and the loss on store closings of
$0.9 million) accounted for approximately 56.7% of
consolidated pre-tax earnings, adjusted for the items referred
to above, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and
93.3% of consolidated pre-tax earnings (exclusive of litigation
expense of $57.5 million and the loss on store closings of
$3.0 million) for the twelve months ended June 30,
2009. U.K. operations (exclusive of the loss on extinguishment
of debt of $4.7 million and unrealized foreign exchange
translation losses of $8.0 million) accounted for
approximately 57.2% of consolidated pre-tax earnings for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 43.9% of consolidated
pre-tax earnings (exclusive of the unrealized foreign exchange
translation gain of $5.5 million) for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009. U.S. operations (exclusive of the
loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million, litigation
expense of $6.4 million and losses on store closings
56
of $2.4 million) accounted for approximately 12.7% of
consolidated pre-tax earnings for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2010 and 37.2% of consolidated pre-tax earnings
(exclusive of litigation expense of $0.4 million and losses
on store closings of $7.2 million) for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009. As currency exchange rates change,
translation of the financial results of the Canadian and U.K.
operations into U.S. dollars will be impacted. Changes in
exchange rates have resulted in cumulative translation
adjustments increasing our net assets by $13.3 million.
These gains and losses are included in other comprehensive
income.
We estimate that a 10.0% change in foreign exchange rates by
itself would have impacted reported pre-tax earnings from
continuing operations (exclusive of losses on extinguishment of
debt of $8.4 million, unrealized foreign exchange
translation losses of $10.2 million, losses on derivatives not
designated as hedges of $12.9 million, litigation expense
of $22.6 million and losses on store closings of
$0.9 million) by approximately $9.2 million for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and $9.7 million
(exclusive of the unrealized foreign exchange translation gain
of $5.5 million, litigation expense of $57.5 million
and losses on store closings of $3.2 million) for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2009. This impact represents
11.3% of our consolidated foreign pre-tax earnings for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 13.7% of our
consolidated foreign pre-tax earnings for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2009. It should also be noted that a 10%
change in the Canadian exchange rate would additionally impact
reported pre-tax earnings from continuing operations by
approximately $21.8 million for the year ended
June 30, 2010 related to the translational effect of net
Canadian liabilities denominated in a currency other than the
Canadian Dollar.
Cross-Currency
Interest Rate Swaps
In December 2006, we entered into cross-currency interest rate
swaps to hedge against the changes in cash flows of our legacy
U.K. and Canadian term loans denominated in a currency other
than our foreign subsidiaries functional currency.
In December 2006, our U.K. subsidiary, Dollar Financial U.K.
Limited, entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap with a
notional amount of GBP 21.3 million that was set to mature
in October 2012. Under the terms of this swap, Dollar Financial
U.K. Limited paid GBP at a rate of 8.45% per annum and Dollar
Financial U.K. Limited received a rate of the three-month
EURIBOR plus 3.00% per annum on EUR 31.5 million. In
December 2006, Dollar Financial U.K. Limited also entered into a
cross-currency interest rate swap with a notional amount of GBP
20.4 million that was set to mature in October 2012. Under
the terms of this cross-currency interest rate swap, we paid GBP
at a rate of 8.36% per annum and we received a rate of the
three-month LIBOR plus 3.00% per annum on US$40.0 million.
On December 23, 2009, the Company used a portion of the net
proceeds of its $600 million Senior Note Offering to prepay
$350 million of the $368.6 million outstanding term
loans. As a result, the Company discontinued prospectively hedge
accounting on its Canadian cross-currency swaps. In accordance
with the provisions of FASB Codification Topic Derivatives and
Hedging, we will continue to report the net gain or loss related
to the discontinued cash flow hedge in other comprehensive
income and will subsequently reclassify such amounts into
earnings over the remaining original term of the derivative when
the hedged forecasted transactions are recognized in earnings.
On a quarterly basis, the cross-currency interest rate swap
agreements call for the exchange of 0.25% of the original
notional amounts after giving effect to the $350 million
prepayment. Upon maturity, these cross-currency interest rate
swap agreements call for the exchange of the remaining notional
amounts. Prior to December 23, 2009 these derivative
contracts were designated as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. Because these derivatives were designated as cash flow
hedges, we recorded the effective portion of the after-tax gain
or loss in other comprehensive income, which is subsequently
reclassified to earnings in the same period that the hedged
transactions affect earnings. Subsequent to December 23,
2009, the swaps are no longer designated as hedges therefore we
record foreign exchange re-measurement gains and losses related
to the term loans and also record the changes in fair value of
the cross-currency swaps each period in loss/gain on derivatives
not designated as hedges in our consolidated statements of
operations. The aggregate fair market value of the
cross-currency interest rate swaps at June 30, 2010 is a
liability of $47.4 million and is included in fair value of
derivatives on the balance sheet. During fiscal 2010 we recorded
$12.9 million in earnings related to the ineffective
portion of these cash flow hedges.
57
On January 14, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the
ISDA Master Agreement governing the outstanding cross-currency
interest rate swap relating to a notional amount of CAD
183.6 million to which National Money Mart Company is a
party to hedge its variable-rate Canadian term loans denominated
in U.S. dollars. The amendment eliminates financial
covenants and allows the underlying swap to remain outstanding
(with a similar collateral package in place) in the event that
we elect to terminate our revolving credit facility prior to the
maturity of the swap in October 2012. On February 8, 2010,
we entered into an amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement
governing the outstanding cross-currency interest rate swap
relating to a notional amount of CAD 145.3 million to which
National Money Mart Company is a party to hedge its
variable-rate Canadian term loans denominated in
U.S. dollars. The amendment includes financial covenants
identical to those in the Companys amended credit facility
and allows the underlying swap to remain outstanding (with a
similar collateral package in place) in the event that we elect
to terminate our revolving credit facility prior to the maturity
of the swap in October 2012. We agreed to pay a higher rate on
both of the interest rate swaps in order to secure these
amendments, the impact of which resulted in a non-cash
$9.2 million charge in the statement of operations.
58
|
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Dollar Financial Corp. (the Company)
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
by, or under the supervision of, the Companys principal
executive and principal financial officers and effected by the
Companys Board of Directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is
supported by written policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
Companys transactions and dispositions of the
Companys assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of the financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of the Companys management and
directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitation, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
In connection with the preparation of the Companys annual
consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based
on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO Framework). Managements
assessment included an evaluation of the design of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and
testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of
June 30, 2010, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm, which audited our financial
statements included in this report, has audited the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of June 30, 2010. Their report is included herein.
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey A. Weiss
|
|
/s/ Randy Underwood
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Weiss
|
|
Randy Underwood
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
August 31, 2010
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
August 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
/s/ William M. Athas
|
|
/s/ Pete Sokolowski
|
|
|
|
William M. Athas
|
|
Pete Sokolowski
|
Senior Vice President of Finance and
|
|
Senior Vice President of Finance
|
Corporate Controller
|
|
and Corporate Treasurer
|
August 31, 2010
|
|
August 31, 2010
|
59
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dollar Financial Corp.
We have audited Dollar Financial Corp.s internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Dollar Financial
Corp.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Dollar Financial Corp. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Dollar Financial Corp. as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2010 of Dollar Financial Corp. and our report
dated August 31, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 31, 2010
60
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dollar Financial Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Dollar Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2010. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Dollar Financial Corp. at June 30,
2010 and 2009 and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Dollar Financial Corp.s internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 31,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
August 31, 2010
61
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
209,602
|
|
|
$
|
291,294
|
|
Loans receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
126,826
|
|
|
|
155,158
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(12,132
|
)
|
|
|
(16,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
114,694
|
|
|
|
138,312
|
|
Loans in default, net of an allowance of $17,000 and $14,448
|
|
|
6,436
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
17,263
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
22,794
|
|
|
|
25,766
|
|
Current deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $4,816
and $4,861
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
360,864
|
|
|
|
480,873
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance of $84,972 and
$80,153
|
|
|
27,062
|
|
|
|
22,585
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$99,803 and $117,169
|
|
|
58,614
|
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
454,347
|
|
|
|
608,986
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6,815
and $3,510
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
|
|
18,654
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,709
|
|
|
|
15,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
921,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,214,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
36,298
|
|
|
$
|
44,885
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
14,834
|
|
|
|
6,192
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
70,588
|
|
|
|
92,573
|
|
Debt due within one year
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
Current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
127,671
|
|
|
|
147,228
|
|
Fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
47,381
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liability
|
|
|
18,876
|
|
|
|
24,046
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
530,425
|
|
|
|
725,309
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
25,192
|
|
|
|
52,314
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value: 55,500,000 shares
authorized; 24,102,985 shares and 24,359,459 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2010, respectively
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
311,301
|
|
|
|
331,090
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(110,581
|
)
|
|
|
(115,480
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dollar Financial Corp. stockholders equity
|
|
|
208,762
|
|
|
|
218,320
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
209,078
|
|
|
|
218,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
921,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,214,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
62
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check cashing
|
|
$
|
196,580
|
|
|
$
|
164,598
|
|
|
$
|
149,474
|
|
Fees from consumer lending
|
|
|
282,480
|
|
|
|
266,506
|
|
|
|
319,465
|
|
Money transfer fees
|
|
|
27,512
|
|
|
|
26,823
|
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
Pawn service fees and sales
|
|
|
12,116
|
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
19,899
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
|
|
56,132
|
|
|
|
94,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
572,184
|
|
|
|
527,853
|
|
|
|
610,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
159,363
|
|
|
|
145,716
|
|
|
|
153,976
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
58,458
|
|
|
|
52,136
|
|
|
|
45,876
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
43,018
|
|
|
|
41,812
|
|
|
|
43,280
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
13,075
|
|
|
|
14,334
|
|
Returned checks, net and cash shortages
|
|
|
20,360
|
|
|
|
16,021
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
Maintenance and repairs
|
|
|
11,962
|
|
|
|
11,836
|
|
|
|
11,867
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
9,398
|
|
|
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
16,692
|
|
Bank charges and armored carrier service
|
|
|
13,494
|
|
|
|
13,357
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
Other
|
|
|
43,238
|
|
|
|
43,737
|
|
|
|
55,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
372,954
|
|
|
|
346,049
|
|
|
|
364,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
199,230
|
|
|
|
181,804
|
|
|
|
246,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
70,859
|
|
|
|
68,217
|
|
|
|
86,824
|
|
Other depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
7,325
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
44,378
|
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
|
|
68,932
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
10,145
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
12,948
|
|
Provision for litigation settlements
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
57,920
|
|
|
|
29,074
|
|
Loss on store closings
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
10,340
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(4,853
|
)
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
79,379
|
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
|
|
16,177
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
36,015
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
21,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,192
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dollar Financial Corp.
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Dollar Financial
Corp.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
24,106,392
|
|
|
|
24,012,705
|
|
|
|
24,106,565
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
24,563,229
|
|
|
|
24,012,705
|
|
|
|
24,106,565
|
|
See accompanying notes.
63
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2007
|
|
|
24,133,800
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
305,376
|
|
|
$
|
(147,123
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,622
|
|
|
$
|
199,899
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,870
|
)
|
|
|
(7,870
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,796
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
53,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
79,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
Vested portion of granted restricted stock and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(37,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
24,229,178
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
309,113
|
|
|
|
(103,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,054
|
|
|
|
239,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,884
|
)
|
|
|
(17,884
|
)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,152
|
)
|
|
|
(8,152
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,858
|
)
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
180,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
260,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,317
|
|
Vested portion of granted restricted stock and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
Purchase and retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
(535,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,492
|
)
|
Retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(31,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
Purchase of Optima, S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
24,102,985
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
311,301
|
|
|
|
(110,581
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
209,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,753
|
)
|
|
|
(7,753
|
)
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,231
|
)
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
231,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
88,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
Vested portion of granted restricted stock and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
Retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(63,118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Debt Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,897
|
|
Retirement of Debt Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010
|
|
|
24,359,459
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
331,090
|
|
|
|
(115,480
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
218,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
64
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20,624
|
|
|
|
19,912
|
|
|
|
25,027
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives not desginated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
58,458
|
|
|
|
52,136
|
|
|
|
45,876
|
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Losses on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
9,914
|
|
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
(10,549
|
)
|
|
|
651
|
|
Accretion of debt discount and deferred issuance costs
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
|
13,423
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities (net of effect of acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in loans and other receivables
|
|
|
(76,478
|
)
|
|
|
(44,342
|
)
|
|
|
(66,738
|
)
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(9,943
|
)
|
|
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
|
(3,611
|
)
|
Provision for litigation settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,219
|
|
|
|
24,603
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
|
|
27,320
|
|
|
|
(7,816
|
)
|
|
|
22,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
80,756
|
|
|
|
59,204
|
|
|
|
86,704
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(143,428
|
)
|
|
|
(26,219
|
)
|
|
|
(155,052
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(23,528
|
)
|
|
|
(15,735
|
)
|
|
|
(29,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(166,956
|
)
|
|
|
(41,954
|
)
|
|
|
(184,447
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 10.375% Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,388
|
|
Proceeds from termination of cross currency swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
3,317
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term loan notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(369,241
|
)
|
Other debt payments
|
|
|
(4,391
|
)
|
|
|
(3,619
|
)
|
|
|
(6,992
|
)
|
Repayment of 9.75% Senior Notes due 2011
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of 2.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,032
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
5,243
|
|
|
|
(3,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(19,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
169,791
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
(20,031
|
)
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(81,231
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
81,692
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
290,945
|
|
|
|
209,714
|
|
|
|
209,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
209,714
|
|
|
$
|
209,602
|
|
|
$
|
291,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
37,843
|
|
|
$
|
32,946
|
|
|
$
|
48,349
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
29,241
|
|
|
$
|
25,788
|
|
|
$
|
22,852
|
|
See accompanying notes.
65
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Business
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are those of
Dollar Financial Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). Dollar Financial Corp.
is the parent company of Dollar Financial Group, Inc.
(OPCO). The activities of Dollar Financial Corp.
consist primarily of its investment in OPCO. Dollar Financial
Corp. has no employees or operating activities.
Dollar Financial Corp. is a Delaware corporation incorporated in
April 1990 as DFG Holdings, Inc. The Company operates a store
network through OPCO. The Company, through its subsidiaries,
provides retail financial services to the general public through
a network of 1,180 locations (of which 1,058 are company owned)
operating principally as Money
Mart®,
The Money Shop, Loan
Mart®,
Insta-Cheques®
and The Check Cashing Store in 17 states, Canada, the
United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. This network
includes 1,173 locations (including 1,058 company-owned) in
15 states, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Republic of
Ireland offering financial services including check cashing,
single-payment consumer loans, sale of money orders, money
transfer services, foreign currency exchange and various other
related services. The Company also provides financial services
to the general public in Poland through in-home servicing. The
Companys network also includes a U.K. and Canadian
Internet-based consumer lending business as well as a U.K. based
merchant cash advance business that primarily provides working
capital to small retail businesses by providing cash advances
against a future receivable calculated as a percentage of future
credit card receipts.
Through Dealers Financial Services, LLC and its wholly
owned subsidiary, Dealers Financial Services Reinsurance
Ltd. (together, DFS), the Company provides fee based
services to enlisted military personnel seeking to purchase new
and used vehicles who make applications for auto loans that are
funded and serviced under an exclusive agreement with a major
third-party national bank based in the United States.
The Companys common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol DLLR.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates
its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue
recognition, loss reserves, valuation allowance for income
taxes, litigation reserves and impairment assessment of goodwill
and other intangible assets and litigation reserves. Management
bases its estimates on historical experience and various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
current year presentation. These reclassifications have no
effect on net income or stockholders equity.
66
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Revenue
Recognition
With respect to company-operated stores, revenues from the
Companys check cashing, money order sales, money transfer
and other miscellaneous services reported in other revenues on
its statement of operations are all recognized when the
transactions are completed at the
point-of-sale
in the store.
With respect to the Companys franchised locations, the
Company recognizes initial franchise fees upon fulfillment of
all significant obligations to the franchisee. Royalties from
franchisees are recognized as earned. The Companys
standard franchise agreement grants to the franchisee the right
to develop and operate a store and use the associated trade
names, trademarks, and service marks within the standards and
guidelines established by the Company. As part of the franchise
agreement, the Company provides certain pre-opening assistance
and after the franchised location has opened, the Company also
provides updates to the software, samples of certain advertising
and promotional materials and other post-opening assistance.
For single-payment consumer loans that the Company makes
directly (company-funded loans), which have terms ranging from 1
to 45 days, revenues are recognized using the interest
method. Loan origination fees are recognized as an adjustment to
the yield on the related loan. The Companys reserve policy
regarding these loans is summarized below in
Company-Funded Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy.
Secured pawn loans are offered at most of our retail financial
services locations in the United Kingdom. We also operate two
traditional pawn shops in Edinburgh and Glasgow, Scotland, and
three pawn shops in London, England specializing in high value
gold jewelry, watches and diamonds. Pawn loans are short-term in
nature and are secured by the customers personal property
(pledge). At the time of pledge, the loan is
recorded and interest and fees are accrued for over the life of
the loan. If the loan is not repaid, the collateral is deemed
forfeited and the pawned item will go up for auction. If the
item is sold, proceeds are used to recover the loan value,
interest accrued and fees. Excess funds received from the sale
are repaid to the customer. As with our single-payment consumer
loans, revenues are recognized using the interest rate method
and loan origination fees are recognized as an adjustment to the
yield on the related loan.
DFS fee income associated with originated loan contracts is
recognized as revenue by the Company concurrent with the funding
of loans by the lending financial institution. The Company also
earns additional fee income from sales of service agreement and
guaranteed asset protection (GAP) insurance
contracts. DFS may be charged back (chargebacks) for
service agreement and GAP fees in the event contracts are
prepaid, defaulted or terminated. Service agreement and GAP
contract fees are recorded at the time the contracts are sold
and a reserve for future chargebacks is established based on
historical operating results and the termination provisions of
the applicable contracts. Service warranty and GAP contract
fees, net of estimated chargebacks, are included in Other
Revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash in stores and demand deposits with financial
institutions. Cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly
liquid investments both readily convertible to known amounts of
cash and so near maturity that there is insignificant risk of
changes in value because of changes in interest rates.
Loans
Receivable, Net
Unsecured short-term and longer-term installment loans that the
Company originates on its own behalf are reflected on the
balance sheet in loans receivable, net. Loans receivable, net
are reported net of a reserve related to consumer lending as
described below in the company-funded consumer loan loss
reserves policy.
67
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Loans
in Default
Loans in default consist of short-term consumer loans originated
by the Company which are in default status. An allowance for the
defaulted loans receivable is established and is included in the
loan loss provisions in the period that the loan is placed in
default status. The reserve is reviewed monthly and any
additional provision to the loan loss reserve as a result of
historical loan performance, current and expected collection
patterns and current economic trends is included with the
Companys loan loss provisions. If the loans remain in a
defaulted status for an extended period of time, an allowance
for the entire amount of the loan is recorded and the receivable
is ultimately charged off.
Other
receivables
Other receivables consist primarily of franchise and other
third-party receivables.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which vary
from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease
term (including renewal options that are reasonably assured) or
the estimated useful life of the related asset.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of the net
assets of the business acquired. In accordance with
ASC 350, (formerly, Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets,) goodwill is assigned to reporting units,
which the Company has determined to be its reportable operating
segments of United States Retail, Canada, the United Kingdom,
DFS and Poland (which is reported in Other). The Company also
has a corporate reporting unit which consists of costs related
to corporate management, oversight and infrastructure, investor
relations and other governance activities. Because of the
limited activities of the corporate reporting unit, no goodwill
has been assigned. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit
that benefits from the synergies arising from each particular
business combination. The determination of the operating
segments being equivalent to the reporting units for goodwill
allocation purposes is based upon our overall approach to
managing our business along operating segment lines, and the
consistency of the operations within each operating segment.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis on June
30 or between annual tests if events occur or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
a reporting unit below its carrying amount. To accomplish this,
the Company is required to determine the carrying value of each
reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities,
including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those
reporting units. The Company is then required to determine the
fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying
amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount
of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting
unit, the Company is required to perform a second step to the
impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting
unit goodwill may be impaired. If, after the second step of
testing, the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
fair value of the individual tangible and identifiable
intangible assets, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to the excess of the implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill over its carrying value.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of reacquired
franchise rights and DFS MILES program, which are deemed
to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized.
Non-amortizable
intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment
annually as of December 31, or whenever events or changes
in business
68
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. If the
estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the
intangible assets with indefinite lives, then an impairment
charge would be recognized to reduce the asset to its estimated
fair value.
The Company considers the goodwill impairment and indefinite
intangible impairment process to be one of the critical
accounting estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements. The Company estimates the fair value of
its reporting units using a discounted cash flow analysis. This
analysis requires the Company to make various judgmental
assumptions about revenues, operating margins, growth rates, and
discount rates. These assumptions are based on the
Companys budgets, business plans, economic projections,
anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions
are also made for perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the
Companys long-term business plan period. The Company
performs its goodwill impairment test annually as of
June 30, and its reacquired franchise rights impairment
test annually as of December 31. At the date of its last
evaluations, there was no impairment of goodwill or reacquired
franchise rights. However, the Company may be required to
evaluate the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible
assets prior to the required annual assessment if it experiences
a significant disruption to its business, unexpected significant
declines in its operating results, divestiture of a significant
component of its business, a sustained decline in market
capitalization, particularly if it falls below the
Companys book value, or a significant change to the
regulatory environment in which the Company operate. While the
Company believes that it has made reasonable estimates and
assumptions to calculate the fair value of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets, it is possible a material
change could occur, including if actual experience differs from
the assumptions and considerations used in the Companys
analyses. These differences could have a material adverse impact
on the consolidated results of operations, and cause the Company
to perform the second step impairment test, which could result
in a material impairment of the Companys goodwill. The
Company will continue to monitor its actual cash flows and other
factors that may trigger a future impairment in the light of the
continuing global downturn.
Debt
Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective yield
method over the remaining term of the related debt (see
Note 7).
Operating
Expenses
The direct costs incurred in operating the Companys
business have been classified as operating expenses. Operating
expenses include salaries and benefits of store and regional
employees, provisions for loan losses, rent and other occupancy
costs, depreciation of property and equipment used to operate
our business, bank charges, armored carrier services, returned
checks, net and cash shortages, advertising, maintenance and
repairs and other costs incurred by the stores. Excluded from
operating expenses are the corporate expenses of the Company,
which include salaries and benefits of corporate employees,
professional fees and travel costs.
Company-Funded
Consumer Loan Loss Reserves Policy
The Company maintains a loan loss reserve for anticipated losses
for consumer loans that the Company directly originates. To
estimate the appropriate level of loan loss reserves, the
Company considers known relevant internal and external factors
that affect loan collectability, including the amount of
outstanding loans owed to the Company, historical loans charged
off, current collection patterns and current economic trends.
The Companys current loan loss reserve is based on its net
charge-offs, typically expressed as a percentage of loan amounts
originated for the last twelve months applied against the
principal balance of outstanding loans
69
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Company-Funded
Consumer Loan Loss Reserves
Policy (continued)
that the Company makes directly. As these conditions change, the
Company may need to make additional allowances in future periods.
Generally, when a loan is originated, the customer receives the
cash proceeds in exchange for a post-dated check or a written
authorization to initiate a charge to the customers bank
account on the stated maturity date of the loan. If the check or
the debit to the customers account is returned from the
bank unpaid, the loan is placed in default status and an
allowance for this defaulted loan receivable is established and
is included in loan loss provision expense in the period that
the loan is placed in default status. This reserve is reviewed
monthly and any additional provision to the loan loss reserve as
a result of historical loan performance, current collection
patterns and current economic trends is included in loan loss
provision expense. If a loan remains in defaulted status for an
extended period of time, an allowance for the entire amount of
the loan is recorded and the receivable is ultimately charged
off.
Check
Cashing Returned Item Policy
The Company charges operating expense for losses on returned
checks during the period in which such checks are returned.
Recoveries on returned checks are credited to operating expense
in the period during which recovery is made. This direct method
for recording returned check losses and recoveries eliminates
the need for an allowance for returned checks.
Income
Taxes
As part of the process of preparing the consolidated financial
statements, the Company is required to estimate our income taxes
in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process
involves estimating the actual current tax liability together
with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which
are included within our consolidated balance sheet. An
assessment is then made of the likelihood that the deferred tax
assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the
extent we believe that recovery is not likely, the Company
establishes a valuation allowance. The Company intends to
reinvest our foreign earnings and a result, they do not provide
a deferred tax liability on foreign earnings.
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes pursuant to
Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB)
Accounting Codification Statement (ASC) 740,
Income Taxes (ASC 740). The Company
recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only
if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained
on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such positions are then measured based
on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of
being realized upon settlement. Interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, are recognized in the
income tax provision.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
costs charged to expense were $9.4 million,
$8.4 million and $16.7 million for the three years
ended June 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Companys 2.875% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2027 issued by Dollar Financial Corp. (the
2027 Notes), the 3.00% Senior Convertible Notes
due 2028 (the 2028 Notes) and the
70
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
103/8% Senior
Notes due 2016 issued by the Companys Canadian subsidiary,
National Money Mart Company (the 2016 Notes), are
based on broker quotations.
The total fair value of the 2027 Notes and the 2028 Notes were
approximately $40.0 million and $143.5 million,
respectively, at June 30, 2010. These fair values relate to
the face value of the 2027 Notes and the 2028 Notes, and not the
carrying value recorded on the Companys balance sheet. The
fair value of the 2016 Notes was approximately
$609.0 million at June 30, 2010.
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and
cash equivalents, derivatives, loan and other consumer lending
receivables, which are short-term in nature and their fair value
approximates their carrying value net of allowance for loan loss.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Derivative and Hedging Topic of the FASB Codification
requires companies to provide users of financial statements with
an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments
and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. This Topic also requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and
losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
instruments.
As required by the Derivative and Hedging Topic of the FASB
Codification, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at
fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of
derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative,
whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging
relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging
relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge
accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of
the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset,
liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk,
such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure
to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of
forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign
currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the
timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument
with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the
hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged
risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged
forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We may enter into
derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge
certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not
apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
Put
Options
Operations in the United Kingdom and Canada expose the Company
to shifts in currency valuations. From time to time, the Company
purchases put options in order to protect aspects of the
Companys operations in the United Kingdom and Canada
against foreign currency fluctuations. Out of the money put
options are generally used because they cost less than
completely averting risk using at the money put options, and the
maximum loss is limited to the purchase price of the contracts.
The Company has designated the purchased put options as cash
flow hedges of the foreign exchange risk associated with the
forecasted purchases of foreign-currency-denominated investment
securities. These cash flow hedges have maturities of less than
twelve months. For derivative instruments that are designated
and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the
gain or loss on the derivative instrument are initially recorded
in accumulated other
71
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging
Activities (continued)
comprehensive income as a separate component of
stockholders equity and are subsequently reclassified into
earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is
recognized in earnings. Any ineffective portion of the gain or
loss is reported in other income/expense on the statement of
operations. For options designated as hedges, hedge
effectiveness is measured by comparing the cumulative change in
the hedge contract with the cumulative change in the hedged
forecasted transactions, both of which are based on forward
rates.
Cross-Currency
Interest Rate Swaps
From time to time, the Company enters into cross-currency
interest rate swaps to protect against changes in cash flows
attributable to changes in both the benchmark interest rate and
foreign exchange rates on its foreign denominated variable rate
term loan borrowing. In the past, the Company designated
derivative contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. The Company recorded foreign exchange re-measurement
gains and losses related to the term loans and also records the
changes in fair value of the cross-currency swaps each period in
loss/gain on derivatives not designated as hedges in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations. Because
these derivatives were designated as cash flow hedges, the
Company recorded the effective portion of the after-tax gain or
loss in other comprehensive income, which was subsequently
reclassified to earnings in the same period that the hedged
transactions affect earnings.
At such time that the derivatives no longer met the requirements
of hedge accounting and to the extent that third party debt
remained outstanding, the Company concluded that the original
hedged transactions were still probable of occurring. Therefore,
in accordance with the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB
Codification, the Company continued to report the net gain or
loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedges in other
accumulated comprehensive income and is subsequently
reclassifying such amounts into earnings over the remaining
original term of the derivative as the hedged forecasted
transactions are recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
The Company operates financial service outlets in Canada, the
United Kingdom and Poland. The financial statements of these
foreign businesses have been translated into U.S. dollars
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. All balance sheet accounts are translated at the
current exchange rate at each period end and income statement
items are translated at the average exchange rate for the
period; resulting translation adjustments are made directly to a
separate component of stockholders equity. Gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions including the
revaluation of non-functional denominated debt are included in
other expense (income), net.
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net
income/loss by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed by
dividing net income/loss by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, after adjusting for the
dilutive effect of
72
DOLLAR
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Earnings
per Share (continued)
stock options. The following table presents the reconciliation
of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of
basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Dollar Financial Corp.
|
|
$
|
43,364
|
|
|
$
|
(6,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,899
|
)
|
Reconciliation of denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
basic(1)
|
|
|
24,106
|
|
|
|
24,013
|
|
|
|
24,107
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options(2)
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit
grants(2)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|