Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-10.3 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-3.htm |
EX-10.4 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-4.htm |
EX-10.5 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-5.htm |
EX-32.1 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex32-1.htm |
EX-10.6 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-6.htm |
EX-32.2 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex32-2.htm |
EX-31.2 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex31-2.htm |
EX-10.2 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex31-1.htm |
EX-10.1 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-1.htm |
EX-10.7 - ZONZIA MEDIA, INC. | v194043_ex10-7.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from:_________________ to:
________________
Commission
File Number 2-75313
INDIGO-ENERGY,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA
|
84-0871427
|
(State
of or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer
I.D.
No.)
|
701 N.
Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 200
Henderson,
Nevada 89074
(Address
of Principal Executive Office)
(702)
990-3387
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. þ Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 if Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files) o Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding
as of August 13, 2010
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value
|
891,193,045
|
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|||
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
1
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
F-1
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF
OPERATION
|
2
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISKS.
|
6
|
|
ITEM
4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
6
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
7
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
7
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS.
|
7
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR
SECURITIES
|
8
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
8
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
8
|
|
EXHIBITS
|
9
|
||
SIGNATURE |
10
|
i
PART
I FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Index
to Financial Statements
Condensed
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
F–1 | |||
Condensed
Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
F–2 | |||
F–3 | ||||
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
|
F–4 |
1
INDIGO-ENERGY,
INC.
Condensed
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 127,028 | $ | 411,042 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
2,955 | 7,960 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
5,697 | 9,825 | ||||||
Deferred
loan costs, net
|
101,250 | - | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
236,930 | 428,827 | ||||||
Proved
oil and gas properties, net
|
412,914 | 426,635 | ||||||
Unproved
oil and gas properties
|
4,232,946 | 3,743,736 | ||||||
Total
oil and gas properties, net
|
4,645,860 | 4,170,371 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
||||||||
Deferred
loan costs, net - related party
|
- | 498,319 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 4,882,790 | $ | 5,097,517 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 3,121,302 | $ | 3,617,056 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses - related party
|
112,500 | 493,569 | ||||||
Liability
due to operator
|
67,177 | 83,767 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of discount
|
548,244 | 1,218,334 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of discount - related party
|
- | 375,000 | ||||||
Convertible
notes, net of discount
|
766,667 | 666,667 | ||||||
Current
portion of long term notes payable - related party
|
- | 987,761 | ||||||
Derivative
liability
|
525,754 | 310,789 | ||||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest
|
- | 262,660 | ||||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest - related party
|
- | 329,984 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
5,141,644 | 8,345,587 | ||||||
Long
term liabilities
|
||||||||
Liability
due to operator
|
373,673 | 382,621 | ||||||
Accrued
interest - related party
|
81,435 | 426,129 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of discount - related party
|
4,587,879 | 2,656,543 | ||||||
Asset
retirement obligation
|
303,109 | 290,580 | ||||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest
|
- | 239,220 | ||||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest - related party
|
- | 300,536 | ||||||
Total
long term liabilities
|
5,346,096 | 4,295,629 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
10,487,740 | 12,641,216 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders'
deficit
|
||||||||
Common
stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
881,193,045
and 700,251,299 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
and
December 31, 2009, respectively
|
881,193 | 700,251 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
79,476,413 | 73,800,774 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(85,962,556 | ) | (82,044,724 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(5,604,950 | ) | (7,543,699 | ) | ||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 4,882,790 | $ | 5,097,517 |
See notes
to these condensed financial statements.
F-1
INDIGO-ENERGY,
INC.
Condensed
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
June 30, |
Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Restated
|
Restated
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 99,599 | $ | 15,487 | $ | 129,971 | $ | 90,305 | ||||||||
Revenues
- related party
|
- | - | - | 19,271 | ||||||||||||
Net
revenues
|
99,599 | 15,487 | 129,971 | 109,576 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
26,538 | 16,725 | 43,488 | 36,565 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses - related party
|
- | - | - | 5,604 | ||||||||||||
Depletion
|
7,698 | 10,749 | 13,722 | 27,469 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative - related party
|
297,500 | 80,000 | 362,500 | 2,145,000 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
329,160 | 386,876 | 832,582 | 895,921 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
660,896 | 494,350 | 1,252,292 | 3,110,559 | ||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(561,297 | ) | (478,863 | ) | (1,122,321 | ) | (3,000,983 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income (expenses)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
and forbearance expense, net
|
(280,683 | ) | (149,411 | ) | (657,540 | ) | (324,067 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
expense, net - related party
|
(153,905 | ) | (407,591 | ) | (820,747 | ) | (898,209 | ) | ||||||||
Loss
on settlement of payable
|
(146,172 | ) | - | (772,162 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(230,594 | ) | - | (412,871 | ) | - | ||||||||||
(Loss)
gain on extinguishment of debt - related party, net
|
- | 119,500 | (318,418 | ) | 119,500 | |||||||||||
Gain
on derivative (restated)
|
876,708 | 170,921 | 297,299 | 670,830 | ||||||||||||
Excess
derivative value expense
|
(9,811 | ) | - | (111,071 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Total
other expense, net
|
55,543 | (266,581 | ) | (2,795,510 | ) | (431,946 | ) | |||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (505,754 | ) | $ | (745,444 | ) | $ | (3,917,831 | ) | $ | (3,432,929 | ) | ||||
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
835,129,687 | 666,511,629 | 782,234,146 | 618,980,249 |
See notes
to these condensed financial statements.
F-2
INDIGO-ENERGY,
INC.
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six
Months Ended
June 30, |
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Restated
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss (restated)
|
$ | (3,917,831 | ) | $ | (3,432,929 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
||||||||
Share-based
compensation for consulting services
|
252,500 | - | ||||||
Stock
warrants issued - related party
|
- | 2,020,000 | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred loan costs
|
355,350 | 6,667 | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred loan costs - related party
|
213,318 | 31,260 | ||||||
Amortization
of discount on notes
|
54,980 | 42,973 | ||||||
Amortization
of discount on notes - related party
|
468,188 | 338,709 | ||||||
Amortization
of discount on convertible notes
|
100,000 | 152,770 | ||||||
Depletion
expense
|
13,722 | 27,469 | ||||||
Share-based
interest expense - related party
|
- | 198,000 | ||||||
Loss
on settlement of payable
|
772,162 | - | ||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
412,871 | - | ||||||
(Gain)
loss on extinguishment of debt - related party
|
318,418 | (119,500 | ) | |||||
Gain
on deravitive (restated)
|
(297,299 | ) | (670,830 | ) | ||||
Excess
derivative value expense
|
111,071 | - | ||||||
Settlement
expense
|
- | 2,246 | ||||||
Settlement
expense - related party
|
- | 2,822 | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Advances
to related party
|
- | (425 | ) | |||||
Accounts
receivable
|
5,005 | 183,816 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable - related party
|
- | 13,570 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
9,825 | 98,283 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(169,798 | ) | (4,773 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses - related party
|
150,015 | 410,543 | ||||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest
|
16,727 | (88,640 | ) | |||||
Obligation
to former noncontrolling interest - related party
|
13,314 | (111,360 | ) | |||||
Asset
retirement obligation
|
12,529 | 51,390 | ||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,104,933 | ) | (847,939 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Tangible
and intangible drilling costs for oil and gas properties
|
(540,581 | ) | (792,283 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(540,581 | ) | (792,283 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of debt
|
- | 25,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of debt - related party
|
75,000 | 990,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of convertible debt
|
1,136,500 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of convertible debt - related party
|
150,000 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,361,500 | 1,015,000 | ||||||
Net
(decrease) in cash
|
(284,014 | ) | (625,222 | ) | ||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
411,042 | 625,222 | ||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$ | 127,028 | $ | - |
See notes
to these condensed financial statements.
F-3
NOTE
1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
unaudited condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by
Indigo-Energy, Inc. (the “Company” or “Indigo”), without audit, pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial
statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to fairly present such information. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature, except the modification of certain notes payable that
were accounted for as a Troubled Debt Restructuring (see Note 4) and in 2009,
the modification of certain notes payable that were accounted for as a Troubled
Debt Restructuring. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information
and footnote disclosures, including a description of significant accounting
policies normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US
GAAP”), have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2010. The results
of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
for any subsequent quarter or for the entire fiscal year ending December 31,
2010.
For
comparability purposes, certain figures for the prior periods have been
reclassified where appropriate to conform to the financial statements
presentation used in the current reporting period. These
reclassifications have no effect on the reported net loss, except as disclosed
in Note 2.
Selected
Accounting Policies
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of
accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“US GAAP”) and have been presented on a going concern
basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Management periodically reviews its
estimates, including those related to the determination of proved reserves, well
completion percentage under the drilling program, estimates of future
dismantlement costs, estimates of average expected life and annual forfeitures
of stock options and warrants, estimates of fair market value of debt used in
evaluating whether the accounting for debt modifications should be accounted for
as a troubled debt restructuring or as an extinguishment or modification of
debt, estimates for the liability for variable conversion features on its
convertible debt, estimates of future cash flows in valuing oil and gas
properties, income taxes and litigation and estimates of the fair value of the
derivatives associated with some of our warrants, certain non-employee stock
options, and convertible debt instruments. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Management
believes that it is reasonably possible the following material estimates
affecting the financial statements could significantly change in the coming
year: (1) estimates of proved gas reserves and (2) estimates as to the expected
future cash flows from proved gas properties (3) estimates of the fair value of
the derivatives associated with certain warrants, non-employee stock options,
and convertible debt instruments.
F-4
Cash
Cash
includes cash on hand. The Company did not have any cash equivalents during the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31,
2009.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
Company applies the fair value hierarchy as established by US
GAAP. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the balance
sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the
inputs used to measure the fair value as follows.
•
|
Level
1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
•
|
Level
2 – other significant observable inputs for the assets or liabilities
through corroboration with market data at the measurement
date.
|
•
|
Level
3 – significant unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best
estimate of what market participants would use to price the assets or
liabilities at the measurement
date.
|
US
GAAP requires that embedded derivative instruments be bifurcated and
assessed, along with free-standing derivative instruments such as warrants and
non-employee stock-options to determine whether they should be considered a
derivative liability and subject to re-measurement at their fair value. In
estimating the appropriate fair value, the Company uses a Black-Scholes
option pricing model.
The
following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2010 for
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Level I
|
Level II
|
Level III
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 127,028 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 127,028 | ||||||||
Convertible
notes, net of discount
|
- | - | (766,667 | ) | (766,667 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivative
liability
|
- | - | (525,754 | ) | (525,754 | ) |
Derivative
liability was valued under the Black-Scholes model, with the following
assumptions:
Risk
free interest rate
|
0.4%
|
||
Expected
life
|
0.08
to 7.34 years
|
||
Dividend
yield
|
0%
|
||
Volatility
|
170%
to 181%
|
F-5
The
following tables provides a reconciliation between beginning and ending balances
of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis that used significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Notes
|
||||||||
Payable,
|
||||||||
Derivative
|
Net of
|
|||||||
|
Liability
|
Discount
|
||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
(310,789
|
)
|
$
|
(2,796,528
|
)
|
||
Additions
to liability
|
(1,285,746
|
)
|
(500,000
|
)
|
||||
Subtractions
from liability
|
773,482
|
2,529,861
|
||||||
Gain
included in earnings
|
297,299
|
-
|
||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
$
|
(525,754
|
)
|
$
|
(766,667
|
)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
There are
no recent accounting pronouncements that we expect to have a material impact on
our financial statements.
NOTE
2 - RESTATEMENT TO PRIOR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This
restatement is to correct an error in the application of certain accounting
principles related to the issuance of some of the Company’s previously issued
and vested non-employee stock options and warrant transactions resulting from
the Global Settlement Agreement with the former partners of Indigo-Energy
Partners, LP which occurred during prior periods. These vested non-employee
options and warrants were previously recorded in equity. Due to the
Company having other instruments outstanding that were convertible into an
indeterminate number of shares of common stock at the grant date of the vested
non-employee options and warrants, these options and warrants should have been
classified as liabilities. The net effect of the restatement on the balance
sheet as of June 30, 2009 is not material.
The net
effect of the restatement related to valuation adjustments of the derivative
liabilities on the consolidated statements of operations for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Reported
|
Restated
|
|||||||||||
For
the
|
For
the
|
|||||||||||
Three
Months
|
Three
Months
|
|||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||||||||
June
30,
|
Effect
of
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
Restatement
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Other
income (expenses)
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on derivative
|
$ | - | $ | 170,921 | $ | 170,921 | ||||||
Total
other expense, net
|
(437,502 | ) | 170,921 | (266,581 | ) | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (916,365 | ) | $ | 170,921 | $ | (745,444 | ) | ||||
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
F-6
The net
effect of the restatement related to valuation adjustments of the derivative
liabilities on the consolidated statements of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Reported
|
Restated
|
|||||||||||
For
the
|
For
the
|
|||||||||||
Six
Months
|
Six
Months
|
|||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||||||||
June
30,
|
Effect
of
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
Restatement
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Other
income (expenses)
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on derivative
|
$ | - | $ | 670,830 | $ | 670,830 | ||||||
Total
other expense, net
|
(1,102,776 | ) | 670,830 | (431,946 | ) | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (4,103,759 | ) | $ | 670,830 | $ | (3,432,929 | ) | ||||
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | - | $ | (0.01 | ) |
The net
effect of the restatement on the consolidated statements of cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 was a decrease in net loss of $670,830 and an
increase in gain on derivative of $670,830 resulting in no change to our
previously reported cash used in operations, investing, or financing
activities.
NOTE
3 - OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
Oil and
gas properties consisted of the following:
June
30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Acquisition,
exploration and development costs
|
$
|
13,999,355
|
$
|
13,510,144
|
||||
Impairment
charge
|
(8,992,130
|
)
|
(8,992,130
|
)
|
||||
Depletion
|
(361,365
|
)
|
(347,643
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
4,645,860
|
$
|
4,170,371
|
A
significant portion of the Company’s oil and gas assets located in the
Illinois Basin are subject to mechanics’ liens filed by certain oil and gas
subcontractors.
NOTE
4 - NOTES PAYABLE
We have
significant notes payable obligations with various parties, the additional
details of which are included in the financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2010.
Convertible
Notes - Series 1
As of
June 30, 2010, the Company has $666,667 of convertible notes, which includes
$266,667 of liability for variable conversion features on the notes, and
$114,324 of accrued interest which is recorded in accounts payable and accrued
expenses. The convertible notes were originally due in September and October of
2009. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has failed to pay its obligations on this
series of notes, and as such, was in default on the obligations.
F-7
Other
Convertible Notes
In March
2010, the Company borrowed $674,500 from various lenders, of which $50,000 was
due to an entity controlled by James Walter, Jr., a related party, and issued
promissory notes in the amount of $424,500 with interest at 9% per annum, and
promissory notes in the amount of $250,000 with interest at 12% per
annum. These promissory notes have a maturity date of March 2011.
Under the terms of these promissory notes, the lenders have the option to
convert the principal and then outstanding interest thereon at a conversion rate
of $0.025 per share of common stock prior to April 1, 2010, and $0.05 per share
of common stock between April 1, 2010 and the due date of the notes. Within
thirty days of the funding of the loan, the lender is also entitled to receive
shares of the Company’s common stock equal to ten times and four times,
respectively, of the numerical dollars of the principal of such promissory
notes. The shares were issued in March 2010. At the option of the Company, the
due date of the notes may be extended for one year on an aggregate of $424,500
of notes. If the notes are extended, the Company shall make an interest payment
equal to the accrued interest payable at the due date. In the event the notes
are unpaid within ten days of their maturity date, the Company will incur a late
charge equal to 10% of the amount outstanding on the notes and on $424,500
of notes the Company will be required to issue 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock per note within thirty days of default, and on $250,000 of notes
the Company will be required to pay a late payment penalty of $3,000 for every
60 days after the due date until the obligation is paid. In March 2010, lenders
holding an aggregate of $424,500 of notes converted their notes into 16,980,000
shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in March 2010. As
of June 30, 2010, $250,000 of these notes was still outstanding.
In April,
May and June 2010, the Company borrowed $612,000 from various lenders, of which
$100,000 was due to James C. Walter, Sr., a related party, and issued promissory
notes that provided for interest at 9% per annum on $412,000 of notes and 12%
per annum on $200,000 of notes, with a maturity dates in April, May and June
2011. The lenders have the option to convert the principal and then outstanding
interest at between $0.015 and $0.030 per share of common stock, depending on
the particular note, prior to approximately one month from the date of the note
and between $0.04 and $0.05 per share of common stock, depending on the
particular note, after approximately one month from the date of the
note until the due date of the notes. Within thirty days of the funding of
the loan, the lender is also entitled to receive shares of the Company’s common
stock equal to between zero and ten times, depending on the particular note, the
numerical dollars of the principal of the loan. The shares were issued in April,
May and June 2010. At the option of the Company, the due date of the notes may
be extended for one year on an aggregate of $412,000 of notes. If the notes are
extended, the Company shall make an interest payment equal to the accrued
interest payable at the due date. In the event the notes are unpaid within ten
days of their maturity date, the Company will incur a late charge equal to 10%
of the amount outstanding on the notes and on $577,000 of notes the Company will
be required to issue 5,000,000 shares per note of the Company’s common stock
within thirty days of default, and on $35,000 of notes the Company will be
required to pay a late payment penalty of $3,000 for every 60 days after the due
date until the obligation is paid. In May and June 2010, lenders holding an
aggregate of $362,000 of notes converted their notes into 17,983,333 shares of
the Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in May and June 2010. As of
June 30, 2010, $250,000 of these notes was still outstanding.
We valued
the 9,750,000 shares issued with the notes at $456,600 based on our stock
trading price on the dates of the promissory notes and recorded the amount to
deferred loan fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded
amortization of deferred loan fees in the amount of $355,350.
Since
other outstanding convertible notes were potentially convertible into an
unlimited number of shares that could exceed the Company’s authorized shares,
the Company recorded a derivative liability related to the conversion feature of
the new notes. Upon the issuance of the convertible notes, the Company has
ascribed a value of the derivative liability in the amount of $1,285,746 of
which $111,072 exceeded the total proceeds of the notes and has been recognized
as excess derivative value expense.
F-8
Notes
- Series 2
On
February 26, 2010, the lenders on this series of notes agreed to settle all
outstanding obligations amounting to $207,276, which includes $82,276 of
accrued interest, of which $124,212, which includes $49,212 of accrued interest,
is due to the Braatz family, a related party, in exchange for 5,000,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in March 2010. For the six
months ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of
debt in the amount of $42,721, of which $25,788 was due to a related
party.
Promissory
Notes
Note
Payable 1
On April
20, 2010, the lender on this note agreed to settle all outstanding
obligations amounting to $428,370, which includes $100,317 of accrued
interest, in exchange for 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,
10,000,000 of which are to be issued within 14 days of the agreement and
5,000,000 of which were to be issued on or before June 30, 2010. The 10,000,000
shares were issued in April 2010 and 5,000,000 shares were issued in June 2010.
For the six months ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt in the amount of $221,313.
Note
Payable 2 – Related Party
On
February 26, 2010, the lender, a related party, agreed to settle all outstanding
obligations amounting to $200,000 in exchange for 8,000,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in March 2010. For the six months
ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt to a
related party, in the amount of $200,000, and issued 400,000 penalty shares to
the noteholder which were valued at $14,000 and recorded as an interest
expense.
Note
Payable 5
On
February 26, 2010, the lender agreed to settle all outstanding obligations
amounting to $110,000, which includes $10,000 of accrued interest, in exchange
for 4,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in
March 2010. For the six months ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss
on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $110,000, and issued 220,000 penalty
shares to the noteholder, which were valued at $7,700 and recorded as an
interest expense.
Other
Promissory Notes
In 2007,
we borrowed $165,000 from various individual lenders and issued promissory
notes. In February and March 2010, lenders holding notes in the aggregate amount
of $75,000 agreed to settle all outstanding obligations, including $40,857 of
accrued interest, in exchange for 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock. The shares were issued in March 2010. In May 2010, a lender holding a
note in the amount of $25,000 agreed to settle all outstanding obligations
including $1,719 of accrued interest, in exchange for 900,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. The shares were issued in May 2010. For the six months
ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt in
the amount of $43,424. As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in default on
$65,000 of these notes.
On March
18, 2009, the Company borrowed $125,000 from two lenders, of which $100,000 was
due to James C. Walter, Sr., a related party. During the first quarter of 2010,
the lenders agreed to settle all outstanding obligations including $15,131 of
accrued interest in exchange for 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The shares were issued in March and April of 2010. For the six months ending
June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt in the
amount of $109,869, of which $87,836 was ascribed to a related
party.
On
December 10, 2009, the Company borrowed $500,000 from an individual lender and
issued promissory notes that provided for interest at 9% per annum with a
maturity date of December 10, 2010. As part of consideration for the note, the
Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to the lender. These shares
were issued in December 2009. In the event this note is unpaid within ten days
of its maturity date, the Company will incur a late charge equal to 10% of the
note amount, and issue 5,000,000 shares within 30 days of default. In the event
of default, up to 50% of the net revenue in the Company’s 4-well DuBois drilling
program which is actually received by the Company, net of expenses, liens, and
related obligations, shall be used to repay any remaining balance due under this
note and at the option of the Maker, can be accelerated and due on
demand.
F-9
We valued
the 1,000,000 shares issued with the note at $40,000 based on our stock trading
price on the date of the promissory note. We allocated the proceeds from the
issuance of the note and common stock based on the proportional fair value for
each item. Consequently, we recorded a discount of $37,000 on the promissory
notes, which is being amortized over the term of the note. For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, amortization of the discount amounted to $18,193, which was
recorded as interest expense. The Company also recorded an additional interest
expense of $22,500 during 2010 which was accrued at June 30, 2010.
Carr
Miller Modification
and Consolidation Agreement – Related Party
As of
December 31, 2009 the Company had obligations due to Carr Miller Capital, LLC
(“Carr Miller”) aggregating $7,246,218 under multiple agreements previously
entered into with Carr Miller, the details of which are included in our Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on April 15,
2010. Prior to the Modification and Consolidation Agreement discussed
below, the Company recognized amortization and interest related to these Carr
Miller obligations totaling $716,867 for the six months ended June 30,
2010.
On March
12, 2010, the Parties agreed to enter into a Global Financing Agreement
Extension with Carr Miller, whereby Carr Miller’s commitment to provide the
Company with the remaining funding shall be extended to June 30, 2010. In
satisfaction of its commitment under the GFA, Carr Miller shall, prior to June
30, 2010, have the option to (a) return an aggregate of 14,250,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock currently registered under Carr Miller’s name to the
Company for cancellation; (b) cancel and forgive certain debts owed by the
Company to Carr Miller in the amount of $1,425,000; or (c) provide the Company
with the remaining funding as set forth under the December 2008 GFA. On July 30,
2010, Carr Miller agreed to return the 14,250,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock and the Parties agreed that Carr Miller will return the shares no later
than September 30, 2010.
Additionally,
on March 25, 2010, the Company entered into a Modification and Consolidation
Agreement with Carr Miller whereby all outstanding Carr Miller promissory notes
in the aggregate principal amount of $7,321,218, plus all accrued interest and
penalties thereon, were consolidated into one new promissory note (“New Note”).
The New Note has a principal amount of $8,376,169 and states that commencing
March 25, 2012, the Company is required to make equal monthly installment
payments of principal and interest on the note. The New Note has a maturity date
of March 25, 2014 and bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum. In the event
this note is unpaid within ten days of its maturity date, the Company will incur
a late charge equal to 10% of the note amount. As an inducement to enter into
the Modification and Consolidation Agreement, within thirty days of the
agreement, the lender is also to receive one share of the Company’s common stock
for every dollar of the principal amount of the loan. In accordance
therewith, Carr Miller was issued 8,376,169 shares of the Company’s common stock
in March 2010.
This
transaction has been accounted for as a Troubled Debt Restructuring
(“TDR”). The transaction was determined to be a TDR based on the
creditor being deemed to have granted a concession since the debtor’s effective
borrowing rate on the restructured debt is less than the effective borrowing
rate of the old debt immediately prior to the restructuring. In addition, on the
modification date it was determined that the total future cash payments under
the terms of the modified note were greater than the carrying amount of the
original note. Accordingly, the effects of the restructuring were accounted for
prospectively from the time of the restructuring, and the difference between the
total future cash payments under the terms of the modified note and the carrying
amount of the original note were amortized to interest expense. Accordingly, the
Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $98,125 for the six months
ending June 30, 2010.
F-10
Summary
The
following summarizes the Company’s notes and loan payable as of June 30,
2010:
Instrument
|
Maturity Dates
|
Principal
Amount Owed
|
Debt Discount
|
Amount
Reflected on
Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||
Convertible
Notes
|
||||||||||||||
Convertible
Notes Series 1
|
September
- October 2009
|
$
|
666,667
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
666,667
|
|||||||
Other
Convertible Notes
|
March
- June 2011
|
500,000
|
(400,000
|
)
|
100,000
|
|||||||||
Non-Convertible
Notes
|
||||||||||||||
Other
Promissory Notes
|
January
2008 - December 2010
|
565,000
|
(16,756
|
)
|
548,244
|
|||||||||
Long-Term
Notes Payable
|
||||||||||||||
- related
party
|
March
2014
|
8,376,169
|
(3,788,290
|
)
|
4,587,879
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
10,107,836
|
$
|
(4,205,046
|
)
|
$
|
5,902,790
|
|||||||
Less
long-term portion
|
4,587,879
|
|||||||||||||
Current
portion
|
$
|
1,314,911
|
The
current portion is reflected in the balance sheet as follows:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Notes
payable, net
|
$
|
548,244
|
$
|
1,218,334
|
||||
Notes
payable, net – related party
|
-
|
375,000
|
||||||
Convertible
notes, net
|
766,667
|
666,667
|
||||||
Current
portion of long term notes payable – related party
|
-
|
987,761
|
||||||
$
|
1,314,911
|
$
|
3,247,762
|
F-11
NOTE
5 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - NOT DISCLOSED ELSEWHERE
Common
Stock
In
February 2010, the Company issued 803,137 shares of common stock for legal
services performed in 2009 valued at $0.02 per share.
On
February 26, 2010, the Company settled the remaining monthly payments to the
partners of Indigo-Energy Partners, LP aggregating $1,350,000 by issuing
54,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.025 per share, a 50%
discount to the closing share price on the date of the agreement. The shares
were issued in March 2010.
On June
17, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to certain of its
board members, Brad Hoffman, Everett Miller and Hercules Pappas. The shares were
valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of
issuance resulting in a compensation expense of $22,500 for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of
19,029,107 shares of common stock to settle outstanding professional
fees.
Shares
Issued Pursuant to Various Consulting Agreements
On
January 5, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to
provide various services in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of its restricted
common stock. The term of this agreement is three months commencing January 1,
2010. The shares were issued in March 2010. For the six months ending June 30,
2010, the Company recorded $60,000 of general and administrative expenses
related to such issuance.
On March
24, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide
various services in exchange for a consulting fee of $20,000 for each three
month period and 250,000 shares of its restricted common stock. The shares were
issued in April 2010. The term of this agreement is three months commencing
March 1, 2010 and shall automatically renew for subsequent three month terms
unless terminated with 30 days notice by either party. For the six months ending
June 30, 2010, the Company recorded $35,000 of general and administrative
expenses.
On April
20, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide
various services in exchange for a consulting fee of $500 per month and 100,000
shares of its restricted common stock. The shares were issued in April 2010. The
term of this agreement is three months commencing April 21, 2010 and shall
automatically renew month to month unless terminated with 30 days notice by
either party. For the six months ending June 30, 2010, the Company recorded
$6,000 of general and administrative expenses related thereto.
NOTE
8 - GOING CONCERN
The
Company has incurred significant losses since its inception and is delinquent on
many of its obligations to its creditors. Also, its current liabilities exceed
its current assets. The Company has been borrowing money and has assigned
certain net revenue interests in oil and gas properties as collateral or
consideration for these loans. The Company needs to raise a significant amount
of cash to fund current operations and current capital commitments. There are no
assurances the Company will receive funding necessary to implement its business
plan. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern.
The
Company plans to raise funds from private offerings of equity and debt
securities in addition to expected revenue from its gas wells in order to fund
its operations through June 30, 2011. The Company will need to raise additional
funds in the event it locates additional prospects for acquisition, experiences
cost overruns at its current prospects, or fails to generate projected
revenues.
F-12
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company
raising additional financing on terms desirable to the Company. If the Company
is unable to obtain additional funds when they are required or if the funds
cannot be obtained on terms favorable to the Company, management may be required
to delay, scale back or eliminate its well development program or even be
required to relinquish its interest in one or more properties or in the extreme
situation, cease operations. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
NOTE
8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - NOT DISCLOSED ELSEWHERE
On March
25, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Everett Miller to provide
various services including assisting in the raising short and long-term
financing, the development of the Company’s Strategic Marketing and Business
Plan, and other duties in his role as Chief Operating Officer. As compensation,
Everett Miller will be reimbursed for all approved business-related expenses. In
addition, he will receive an annual consulting fee of $250,000, which will be
phased in, in accordance with available cash flow and operational
considerations. The term of this agreement is six months commencing April 1,
2010 and shall automatically renew for subsequent three month terms unless
terminated with 30 days notice by either party. For the six months ended June
30, 2010, the company recorded compensation expense and a corresponding accrued
expense in the amount of $62,500.
F-13
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
This
Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act. All statements other than statements of historical facts, included in this
Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that we expect or
anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as future
capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business
strategy and measures to implement strategy, competitive strength, goals,
expansion and growth of our business and operations, plans, references to future
success, reference to intentions as to future matters and other such matters are
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions
and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our perception of
historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well
as other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. However,
whether actual results and developments will conform to our expectations and
predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control. Consequently, all of the
forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are qualified by these
cautionary statements and we cannot assure you that the actual results or
developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if realized, that they
will have the expected consequences to or effects on us, our business or
operations. We have no intention, and disclaim any obligation, to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future results or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, all references to “Indigo,”” the” Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” and
similar terms refer to Indigo-Energy, Inc.
General
We are an
independent energy company, currently engaged in the exploration of natural gas
and oil. Our strategy is to profitably grow reserves and production, primarily
through acquiring oil and gas leasehold interests and participating in or
actively conducting drilling operations in order to exploit those
interests.
We have
incurred losses since our inception. We are delinquent on many of our
obligations to our creditors. Our current liabilities exceed our current assets
and we will need additional capital to fund operations. There are no assurances
that we will receive funding to implement our business plan and our independent
registered accountant indicated in their opinion on our 2009 annual financial
statements that there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern.
The
Company has enjoyed substantial progress in development of its strategic
operating plan as developed at the last shareholders’ meeting. We had
set target goals in three specific areas: (1) new drilling and operating wells;
(2) improving our balance sheet and improving our cash flow; and (3) securing
sufficient capital to move the Company forward through a combination of debt and
equity instruments.
·
|
In
new well development, our hub and spoke gas well is in the final stages of
completion. We have connected the wells to the gas cleaning
plant which is also connected to the purchasing pipeline. We believe this
well is within weeks of production and early indications are very
promising. Also in the Dubois field in the Illinois basin, we have
successfully drilled a vertical oil well which is just coming into
production and is generating revenue.
|
|
·
|
As
to balance sheet improvements, we have restructured a number of toxic
promissory notes, worked out settlements with 2 of our 3 operating
drillers to improve cash flow, and converted a number of notes to equity
at a favorable exchange rate. The Company continues to
restructure notes and obligations to favorable longer term
liabilities.
|
|
·
|
Regarding
the search for partnership in development of additional drilling
opportunities, the Company is in various stages of securing commitments to
follow the successful Dubois drilling program with similar programs as
well as the potential acquisition of a current operating
field.
|
2
The
Company needs to raise significant funds for future drilling and operating
costs. Any fundraising conducted by the Company will most likely result in the
issuance of additional shares of common stock which will dilute the ownership
interests of the Company’s current shareholders. The Company’s expectation of
its cash needs is approximately $9,000,000 to fund its current obligations under
the various agreements to which the Company is a party.
During
the next 12 months, we do not anticipate any significant changes in the number
of our employees other than to add adequate field operating personnel to enable
us to monitor and further develop our drilling and operating
opportunities.
Results
of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009
We
incurred a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010 in the amount of
$3,917,831 compared to a net loss of $3,432,929 for the six months ended June
30, 2009. The increase in net loss of $484,902 was primarily attributable to a
$1,845,839 decrease in general and administrative expenses offset by an increase
of $256,011 in interest and forbearance expense, an increase of $772,162 in loss
on settlement of payables, an increase of $850,789 on loss on extinguishment of
debt, an increase of $373,531 in loss on derivatives and an increase of $111,071
in excess derivative value expense.
Revenues
We had
revenue in the amount of $129,971 for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to $109,576 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in
revenue of $20,395 was primarily attributable to the commencement of production
on the DuBois wells which was offset by reduced oil and gas production as well
as a decrease in the demand and pricing for gas from the Company’s other
operating wells.
Depletion
Expense
We
recorded a depletion expense on our proved properties of $13,722 for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $27,469 for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The decrease of $13,747 in depletion expense was primarily due to our
reduced oil and gas production, as well as a decrease in oil and gas carrying
costs at June 30, 2010.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was
$1,195,082 compared to $3,040,921 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease of $1,845,839 in general and administrative expenses was primarily due
to a $2,000,000 decrease in professional fees to a related party. General and
administrative expenses of $1,195,082 for the six months ended June 30, 2010
were primarily comprised of $451,499 of consulting fees, $347,205 of accounting
and auditing fees, and $118,417 of salaries.
3
Interest
and Forbearance Expense
Interest
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1,478,287 compared to
$1,222,276 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense of
$1,478,287 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily comprised of
$568,668 on amortization of deferred loan fees and $852,178 of interest on
various notes payable, including amortization of discounts on the
notes.
Loss
on the Settlement of Payable
Loss on
the settlement of payable for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $772,162
compared to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The loss
related to the settlement of accounts payable through the exchange of common
stock.
Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt
Loss on
the extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $731,289
compared to a gain on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $119,500 for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. The loss was the result of
extinguishment of notes payable and other debt through the exchange of common
stock.
Gain
/ Loss on Derivative
We
incurred a gain on derivatives in the amount of $297,299 for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to a gain on derivative in the amount of $670,830
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The change in value is a
result of the change in the quoted market price for our common stock partially
offset by the shortening of the remaining term for conversion.
Results
of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months
Ended June 30, 2009
We
incurred a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 in the amount of
$505,754 compared to a net loss of $745,444 for the three months ended June 30,
2009. The decrease in net loss of $239,690 was primarily attributable to an
$876,708 increase in gain on derivatives and a $122,414 decrease in interest and
forbearance expense, offset by a $159,784 increase in general and administrative
expenses, a $146,172 increase in loss on settlement of payables, and an increase
of $350,094 on net loss on extinguishment of debt.
Revenues
We had
revenue in the amount of $99,599 for the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared to $15,487 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in
revenue of $84,112 was primarily attributable to the commencement of production
on the DuBois wells.
Depletion
Expense
We
recorded a depletion expense on our proved properties of $7,698 for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $10,749 for the three months ended June
30, 2009. The decrease of $3,051 in depletion expense was primarily due to our
reduced oil and gas production, as well as a decrease in oil and gas carrying
costs at June 30, 2010.
4
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was
$626,660 compared to $466,876 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase of $159,784 in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to
an increase in professional fees. General and administrative expenses of
$606,660 for the three month ended June 30, 2010 were primarily comprised of
$315,500 of consulting fees, $61,583 of salaries, $55,552 of accounting and
auditing fees, and 51,083 of legal fees.
Interest
and Forbearance Expense
Interest
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $434,588 compared to
$557,002 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense of
$434,588 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily comprised of
$121,200 on amortization of deferred loan fees and $307,829 of interest on
various notes payable, including amortization of discounts on the
notes.
Loss
on the Settlement of Payable
Loss on
the settlement of payable for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $146,172
compared to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The loss
related to the settlement of accounts payable through the exchange of common
stock.
Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt
Loss on
the extinguishment of debt for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $230,594
compared to an $119,500 gain on extinguishment of debt for the three months
ended June 30, 2009. The loss and gain were the result of
extinguishment of notes payable and other debt through the exchange of common
stock.
Gain
/ Loss on Derivative
We
incurred a gain on derivative in the amount of $876,708 for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to a gain on derivative in the amount of $170,921
for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The change in value is a
result of the change in the quoted market price for our common stock partially
offset by the shortening of the remaining term for conversion.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our
inception, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of our
common stock and the use of debt and convertible debt. As of June 30, 2010, we
had a cash balance of $127,028.
We
require a minimum of approximately $9,000,000 for the next 12 months, which
includes approximately $510,000 to pay for our outstanding professional fees,
$1,530,000 to pay for outstanding drilling costs to various drillers, $1,320,000
to pay our notes payable obligations, including convertible notes and
$300,000 to pay accrued interest, and $740,000 to fund other operating
costs. In addition to the minimum amount required, the Company expects to spend
approximately $4,600,000 for drilling activities. Moreover, in the event we
locate additional prospects for acquisition, experience cost overruns at our
current prospects, or fail to generate projected revenues, we will need
additional funds during the next month. We currently do not have sufficient
resources to fund our current operations or capital calls, pay our debts and
other liabilities, and operate at our current levels for the next twelve months.
Accordingly, we need to raise additional funds through sales of our securities
or otherwise, immediately.
5
If we are
unable to obtain additional funds on terms favorable to us, if at all, we may be
required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our exploration and
well development programs and may be required to relinquish our interest in one
or more of our projects or, in the extreme case, cease operations.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
There
have been no material changes in our critical estimates from those contained in
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on April 15,
2010.
Off
Balance Sheet Reports
The
Company had no off balance sheet transactions during the six months ended June
30, 2010.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
There
have been no significant changes in our market risks since the year ended
December 31, 2009. For more information, please read the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 15, 2010.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have carried out an evaluation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act)) as of June 30, 2010.
Based on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) are not effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure
Material
Weaknesses
In our
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 under Item 9-A- Controls
and Procedures, we identified material weaknesses in our system of internal
control over financial reporting. A material weakness is defined as a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis.
6
Changes in Internal Control
over Financial Reporting
There
were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting in the six months ending June 30,
2010.
We are
committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment,
we intend to create a position to segregate duties consistent with control
objectives and further intend to increase our personnel resources and technical
accounting expertise within the accounting function as soon as funds become
available to us for such purpose. We intend to prepare and
implement sufficient written policies and checklists which will set forth
procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the
requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure
requirements.
PART
II OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is not a party to any litigation. However, on May 6, 2009, Akerman
Construction Co., Inc., (“Akerman”) a subcontractor of Epicenter, filed a
Mechanic’s Lien against Indigo and two other parties on the four wells drilled
by it on the Dubois Field of Indiana (the “Wells”) for claims aggregating
$875,969. Such claim was predicated on Epicenter’s failure to pay
obligations for the drilling costs.
On July
30, 2009, Akerman filed a Complaint against the Company for Breach of Contract
and to Foreclose Mechanic’s Lien. On September 14, 2009, Akerman
filed a Motion for Leave to Amend its complaint, seeking judgment against the
defendants, jointly and severally, in the sum of $875,969, plus interest thereon
as well as reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of action. The
complaint further seeks an order foreclosing the plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien on
the Wells and an order for the sale of the defendant’s interest therein, the
improvements thereon and the defendant’s leasehold mineral interest to satisfy
the amounts allegedly owing and due to Akerman. Such Motion for Leave
to Amend the complaint was granted on September 14, 2009.
The
Company has engaged counsel to resolve the above claims and a trial date has
been set for December 2010.
On May
12, 2009, M&M Pump & Supply, Inc., a subcontractor of Epicenter, filed a
Mechanic’s Lien against Indigo, Epicenter and four other parties on the four
wells drilled on the Dubois Field of Indiana for claims aggregating
$125,160. Such claim was predicated on Epicenter’s failure to pay
obligations for the drilling costs. The Company has engaged counsel
to resolve these lien claims. To date, no further action has been
taken by M&M Pump & Supply Co.
On July 15, 2010, M&M Pump
& Supply, Inc. filed a Motion to Consolidate its claims with that filed by
Akerman. A hearing on such Motion to Consolidate is scheduled for September 9,
2010.
Our
address for service of process in Nevada is 2857 Sumter Valley Dr., Henderson,
NV 89052.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In April,
May and June 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,904,306 shares of common
stock to settle outstanding professional fees in the amount of
$175,000.
In April,
May and June 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,505,000 shares of common
stock as part of the consideration for convertible promissory notes previously
issued by the Company in the amount of $612,000.
7
In May
and June 2010, the Company issued 17,983,333 shares of common stock to convert
convertible promissory notes previously issued by the Company in the amount of
$362,000.
In April,
May and June 2010, the Company issued 16,900,000 shares of common stock to
settle promissory notes previously issued by the Company in the amount of
$500,000.
In April
and June 2010, the Company issued 10,350,000 shares of common stock as part of
the consideration for a consulting agreements.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
As of
August 13, 2010, the Company was in default of the following senior
securities:
Name of Debtor
|
Type of Obligation
|
Principal
Amount
|
Amount Outstanding
As of August
10,
2010
|
|||||||
Convertibles
Note - Series 1
|
||||||||||
James
Walgreen
|
Promissory
Note
|
$
|
300,000
|
$
|
385,743
|
|||||
Mary
Walgreen
|
Promissory
Note
|
$
|
100,000
|
$
|
128,581
|
|||||
Other
Promissory Notes
|
||||||||||
Robert
Rosania
|
Promissory
Note
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
35,458
|
|||||
Raymond
& Gerri Garonski
|
Promissory
Note
|
$
|
40,000
|
$
|
67,605
|
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
8
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Identification
of Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation*
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws*
|
|
10.1
|
Promissory
Note issued to David C. Stang dated April 9, 2010
|
|
10.2
|
Promissory
Note issued to James C. Walter dated May 18, 2010
|
|
10.3
|
Promissory
Note issued to James and Joan Spears dated June 2, 2010
|
|
10.4
|
Extension
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Carr Miller Capital, LLC
dated
July 30, 2010
|
|
10.5
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Gary A. Greenberg, LLC dated
April
21, 2010
|
|
10.6
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and J. Cory Martelli dated March 1,
2010
|
|
10.7
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Infinity Investments, LLC dated
April
1, 2010
|
|
31.1
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 302 Certification
|
|
31.2
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 302 Certification
|
|
32.1
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 906 Certification
|
|
32.2
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 906 Certification
|
|
*
|
Previously
filed
|
9
SIGNATURE
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly
authorized.
INDIGO-ENERGY, INC. | |||
By:
|
/s/ Steven P. Durdin | ||
Steven P. Durdin | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
(Principal executive officer) |
Date:
August 16, 2010
10
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No.
|
Identification
of Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation*
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws*
|
|
10.1
|
Promissory
Note issued to David C. Stang dated April 9, 2010
|
|
10.2
|
Promissory
Note issued to James C. Walter dated May 18, 2010
|
|
10.3
|
Promissory
Note issued to James and Joan Spears dated June 2, 2010
|
|
10.4
|
Extension
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Carr Miller Capital, LLC
dated
July 30, 2010
|
|
10.5
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Gary A. Greenberg, LLC dated
April
21, 2010
|
|
10.6
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and J. Cory Martelli dated March 1,
2010
|
|
10.7
|
Consulting
Agreement between Indigo-Energy, Inc. and Infinity Investments, LLC dated
April
1, 2010
|
|
31.1
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 302 Certification
|
|
31.2
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 302 Certification
|
|
32.1
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 906 Certification
|
|
32.2
|
Sarbanes
Oxley Section 906 Certification
|
|
*
Previously filed
|
11