Smartag International, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Smartag International, Inc.	exhibit31_2.htm
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - Smartag International, Inc.	exhibit32.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Smartag International, Inc.	exhibit31_1.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-53792

SMARTAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada		81-0554149
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1328 West Balboa Boulevard Suite C, Newport Beach, CA 92661
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s phone number, including area code (949) 903-0468

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES ý NO 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding twelve months (or shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES  NO ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  Accelerated Filer  Non-accelerated Filer  Smaller reporting company ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at August 13, 2010
Common Stock, $.001 par value		10,137,151

INDEX

		Page No.
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
	Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	4
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009	5
	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	6
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	13
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	16
ITEM 4T.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	16
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	17

ITEM 1A	RISK FACTORS	17

ITEM 2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	17

ITEM 3	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	17

ITEM 4	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	17

ITEM 5	OTHER INFORMATION	17

ITEM 6	EXHIBITS	17

- 2 -

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM I — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Smartag International, Inc.

(a development stage company)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,				December 31,
	2010				2009
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		$	6,086			$	10,298

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			6,086				10,298
TOTAL ASSETS		$	6,086			$	10,298

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable			11,840				3,090
Secured revolving note payable, related party			86,274				77,568
Convertible note payable, related party			25,000				25,000
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			123,114				105,658


STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, 25,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively			-				-
Common stock, $.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 10,137,151 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively			10,137				10,137
Additional paid in capital			1,203,861				1,203,861
Accumulated deficit			(1,331,026	)			(1,309,358	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT			(117,028	)			(95,360	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT		$	6,086			$	10,298

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

- 3 -

Smartag International, Inc.

(a development stage company)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Inception (March 24, 1999) through June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010
REVENUES	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
COST OF SALES		-			-			-			-			-
GROSS PROFIT		-			-			-			-			-
OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative expenses		15,667			15,314			21,667			41,664			1,331,026
Total operating expenses		15,667			15,314			21,667			41,664			1,331,026
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(15,667	)		(15,314	)		(21,667	)		(41,664	)		(1,331,026	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Other income		-			-			-			-			-
Total other expense		-			-			-			-			-
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(15,667	)		(15,314	)		(21,667	)		(41,664	)		(1,331,026	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-			-

NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	(15,667	)	$	(15,314	)	$	(21,667	)	$	(41,664	)	$	(1,331,026	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK — Basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING — Basic and diluted		10,137,151			10,137,151			10,137,151			10,137,151

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

- 4 -

Smartag International, Inc.

(Formerly Known as Art4Love, Inc.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Inception (March 24, 1999) through June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(15,667	)	$	(15,314	)	$	(21,667	)	$	(41,664	)	$	(1,331,026	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Debt issued in exchange for services with related party		-			-			-			-			25,000
Shares issued in exchange for debt with related party		-			-			-			-			50,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities;
Accounts payable		2,750			229			8,750			229			11,840
Net cash used in operating activities		(12,917	)		(15,085	)		(12,917	)		(41,435	)		(1,244,186	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net cash provided by investing activities		-			-			-			-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for cash		-			-			-			-			1,148,300
Capital contribution, related party		-			-			-			-			15,698
Proceeds from secured revolving note payable, related party		8,705			20,000			8,705			47,568			86,274
Net cash provided by financing activities		8,705			20,000			8,705			47,568			1,250,272
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(4,212	)		4,915			(4,212	)		6,133			6,086
CASH, Beginning of period		10,298			1,218			10,298			-			-
CASH, End of period	$	6,086		$	6,133		$	6,086		$	6,133		$	6,086
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash received/(paid) during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

- 5 -

Smartag International, Inc.

(a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of Smartag International Inc. (the "Company") are presented in accordance with the requirements for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which were of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company on a consistent basis, have been made.

These results have been determined on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and practices applied consistently with those used in the preparation of the Company's financial statements. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

The Company recommends that the accompanying condensed financial statements for the interim period be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Current Operations and Background

Smartag International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Smartag,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), was formed as Theca Corporation on March 24, 1999 in Colorado. The Company is in the development stage as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7. On November 29, 2004, we merged with Art4Love, Inc., a Delaware corporation, into Art4Love, Inc. a Nevada corporation. Art4love, Inc. attempted to sell and lease art to companies and individuals from artists’ collections worldwide. The Company ceased operations in December 2006. On February 19, 2009, Art4Love changed its name to Smartag International, Inc.

Business

Currently, the Company seeks suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company has made no efforts to identify a possible business combination. As a result, the Company has not conducted negotiations or entered into a letter of intent concerning any target business. The business purpose of the Company is to seek the acquisition of or merger with, an existing company. The Company selected December 31 as its fiscal year end.

The Company is currently considered to be a "blank check" company. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) defines those companies as "any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies." Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, the Company also qualifies as a “shell company,” because it has no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of "blank check" companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as it is subject to those requirements.

The Company’s principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict its potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

- 6 -

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the officers and directors of the Company. As of this date the Company has not entered into any definitive agreement with any party, nor have there been any specific discussions with any potential business combination candidate regarding business opportunities for the Company. The Company has unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In its efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, the Company will consider the following kinds of factors:

(a)	Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

(b)	Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

(c)	Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;

(d)	Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;

(e)	The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

(f)	The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

(g)	The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

(h)	Other relevant factors.

In applying the foregoing criteria, no one of which will be controlling, management will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to the Company's limited capital available for investigation, the Company may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.

Form of Acquisition

The manner in which the Company participates in an opportunity will depend upon the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and the promoters of the opportunity, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such promoters.

It is likely that the Company will acquire its participation in a business opportunity through the issuance of common stock or other securities of the Company. Although the terms of any such transaction cannot be predicted, it should be noted that in certain circumstances the criteria for determining whether or not an acquisition is a so-called "tax free" reorganization under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") depends upon whether the owners of the acquired business own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. If a transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other "tax free" provisions provided under the Code, all prior stockholders would in such circumstances retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. Under other circumstances, depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, prior stockholders may retain substantially less than 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. This could result in substantial additional dilution to the equity of those who were stockholders of the Company prior to such reorganization.

- 7 -

The present stockholders of the Company will likely not have control of a majority of the voting securities of the Company following a reorganization transaction. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of the Company's directors, may resign and one or more new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.

In the case of an acquisition, the transaction may be accomplished upon the sole determination of management without any vote or approval by stockholders. In the case of a statutory merger or consolidation directly involving the Company, it will likely be necessary to call a stockholders' meeting and obtain the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding securities. The necessity to obtain such stockholder approval may result in delay and additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain appraisal rights to dissenting stockholders. Most likely, management will seek to structure any such transaction so as not to require stockholder approval.

It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation might not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to the Registrant of the related costs incurred.

We presently have no employees apart from our management. Our officers and directors are engaged in outside business activities and anticipate that they will devote to our business very limited time until the acquisition of a successful business opportunity has been identified. We expect no significant changes in the number of our employees other than such changes, if any, incident to a business combination.

Basis of Presentation — The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern — Since inception, the Company and has a cumulative net loss of $1,331,026. Since inception, the Company has also been dependent upon the receipt of capital investment or other financing to fund its operations. The Company currently has no source of operating revenue, and has only limited working capital with which to pursue its business plan, which contemplates the completion of a business combination with an operating company. The amount of capital required to sustain operations until the successful completion of a business combination is subject to future events and uncertainties. It may be necessary for the Company to secure additional working capital through loans or sales of common stock, and there can be no assurance that such funding will be available in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying financial statements have been presented on the basis of the continuation of the Company as a going concern and do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Income Taxes — The Company records income taxes in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The standard requires, among other provisions, an asset and liability approach to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are provided if based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents, if any, include all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.

- 8 -

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - On July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("Topic 820"). Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:

·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

·	Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.

The fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accrued liabilities and accounts payable approximate carrying value because of the short-term nature of these items.

Stock-Based Compensation — The Company records transactions under share based payment arrangements in accordance with the provisions of the FASB ASC Topic 718, “Share Based Payment Arrangements”. The standard requires recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements over the period the employee is required to perform the services in exchange for the award. The standard also requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award. The Company is using the modified prospective method allowed under this standard. Accordingly, upon adoption, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of compensation expense for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption and recorded compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption.

The standard provides that income tax effects of share-based payments are recognized in the financial statements for those awards that will normally result in tax deduction under existing law. Under current U.S. federal tax law, the Company would receive a compensation expense deduction related to non-qualified stock options only when those options are exercised and vested shares are received. Accordingly, the financial statement recognition of compensation cost for non-qualified stock options creates a deductible temporary difference which results in a deferred tax asset and a corresponding deferred tax benefit in the income statement. The Company does not recognize a tax benefit for compensation expense related to incentive stock options unless the underlying shares are disposed in a disqualifying disposition.

Net Loss Per Share — The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” Under the provisions of the standard, basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares related to stock options and warrants have been excluded from the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 because their effect is anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Loss - Comprehensive loss is defined as all changes in stockholders' equity, exclusive of transactions with owners, such as capital investments. Comprehensive loss includes net loss, changes in certain assets and liabilities that are reported directly in equity such as translation adjustments on investments in foreign subsidiaries and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company's comprehensive loss was the same as its net loss.

Concentration of Credit Risk — Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash. The Company maintains its cash with high credit quality financial institutions; at times, such balances with any one financial institution may exceed FDIC insured limits.

Financial Instruments — Our financial instruments consist of cash, accounts payable, and notes payable. The carrying values of cash, accounts payable, and notes payable are representative of their fair values due to their short-term maturities.

- 9 -

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new standard regarding the accounting for transfers of financial assets amending the existing guidance on transfers of financial assets to, among other things, eliminate the qualifying special-purpose entity concept, include a new unit of account definition that must be met for transfers of portions of financial assets to be eligible for sale accounting, clarify and change the derecognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale, and require significant additional disclosure. This standard was effective for new transfers of financial assets beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued a new standard that revises the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities. The modifications include the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force , that provides amendments to the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of these amendments, multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. The ASU does this by establishing a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available. A vendor will be required to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. This ASU also eliminates the residual method of allocation and will require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the overall arrangement proportionally to each deliverable based on its relative selling price. Expanded disclosures of qualitative and quantitative information regarding application of the multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement guidance are also required under the ASU. The ASU does not apply to arrangements for which industry specific allocation and measurement guidance exists, such as long-term construction contracts and software transactions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, that reduces the types of transactions that fall within the current scope of software revenue recognition guidance. Existing software revenue recognition guidance requires that its provisions be applied to an entire arrangement when the sale of any products or services containing or utilizing software when the software is considered more than incidental to the product or service. As a result of the amendments included in ASU No. 2009-14, many tangible products and services that rely on software will be accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance rather than under the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the ASU, the following components would be excluded from the scope of software revenue recognition guidance: the tangible element of the product, software products bundled with tangible products where the software components and non-software components function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, and undelivered components that relate to software that is essential to the tangible product’s functionality. The ASU also provides guidance on how to allocate transaction consideration when an arrangement contains both deliverables within the scope of software revenue guidance (software deliverables) and deliverables not within the scope of that guidance (non-software deliverables). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-6, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements , that amends existing disclosure requirements under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 by adding required disclosures about items transferring into and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation. For 3M this ASU is effective for the first quarter of 2010, except for the requirement to provide level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective beginning the first quarter of 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition— a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force that recognizes the milestone method as an acceptable revenue recognition method for substantive milestones in research or development arrangements. This standard would require its provisions be met in order for an entity to recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a substantive milestone as revenue in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. In addition, this ASU would require disclosure of certain information with respect to arrangements that contain milestones. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our financial statements.

- 10 -

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible Note

On November 18, 2008, Smartag issued a Convertible Note (the " Convertible Note ") for $25,000 to Ventana Capital Partners, Inc. (“Ventana”) in connection with $10,000 cash and $15,000 in professional services paid by Ventana. The Convertible Note is due on December 31, 2010 and bares no interest. The Convertible Note may be converted at a time, at the option of the holder, into 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Smartag at $0.005 per share.

Secured Note

On March 17, 2009, we entered into a Secured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Secured Note”) with Smartag Solutions Bhd, a Malaysian corporation, the majority stockholder of the Company. Under the terms of the Note, Smartag Solutions Bhd, agreed to advance to the Company, from time to time and at the request of the Company, amounts up to an aggregate of $200,000 until December 31, 2010. All advances shall be paid on or before December 31, 2010 and interest shall accrue from the date of any advances on any principal amount withdrawn, and on accrued and unpaid interest thereon, at the rate of zero percent (0%) per annum, compounded annually. As of June 30, 2010, Smartag Solutions Bhd advanced us $86,274. The Secured Note ranks senior to all current and future indebtedness of Smartag and is secured by substantially all of the assets of Smartag.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On December 9, 2008, the Company converted $50,000 owed for consulting services to Chad Love Lieberman, the Company’s then President and sole director into 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On December 31, 2008, Chad Love Lieberman, the Company’s then President and sole director, paid $15,698 of the Company’s expenses. This amount was charged to paid in capital.

On November 18, 2008, Smartag issued a Convertible Note (the " Convertible Note ") for $25,000 to Ventana Capital Partners, Inc. (“Ventana”) in connection with cash, cash equivalents and professional services paid by Ventana. The Convertible Note is due on December 31, 2010 and bares no interest. The Convertible Note may be converted at a time, at the option of the holder, into shares of common stock of Smartag at $0.005 per share.

On December 31, 2008, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement Chad Love Lieberman, the Company’s former majority stockholder and President, sold to Smartag Solutions Bhd. an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of Company common stock which amounted to 98.6% of the Company. On December 31, 2008, Mr. Lieberman resigned as President.

On March 17, 2009, we entered into a Revolving Promissory Note (the “Secured Note”) with Smartag Solutions Bhd, a Malaysian corporation, the majority stockholder of the Company. Under the terms of the Note, Smartag Solutions Bhd., agreed to advance to the Company, from time to time and at the request of the Company, amounts up to an aggregate of $200,000 until December 31, 2010. All advances shall be paid on or before December 31, 2010 and interest shall accrue from the date of any advances on any principal amount withdrawn, and on accrued and unpaid interest thereon, at the rate of zero percent (0%) per annum, compounded annually. As of June 30, 2010, Smartag Solutions Bhd advanced us $86,274. The Secured Note ranks senior to all current and future indebtedness of Smartag and is secured by substantially all of the assets of Smartag.

NOTE 5 – EQUITY

Authorized Stock:

As of December 31, 2009, there were authorized 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Each common share entitles the holder to one vote, in person or proxy, on any matter on which action of the stockholder of the corporation is sought.

On December 8, 2008, a reverse split of 1 for 200 was effectuated.

- 11 -

Share Issuance:

On November 1, 2008, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”) with Ventana under which was issued 2,000,000 (10,000 post-split) restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for services to be rendered.

On December 9, 2008, the Company converted $50,000 owed for consulting services to Chad Love Lieberman, the Company’s President and sole director into 10,000,000 (post-split shares) of the Company’s common stock.

Outstanding Options and Warrants:

None

NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On January 7, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Venor, Inc. to provide consulting services on a month to month basis. Eric Stoppenhagen, a principle of Venor, Inc., will provide executive financial services to the Company. Venor, Inc. will be paid $5,000 every month. This contract was terminated as of September 30, 2009.

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through August 13, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued. As of this date, nothing has happened that requires disclosure.

- 12 -

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information contained in this Form 10-Q is intended to update the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and presumes that readers have access to, and will have read, the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other information contained in such Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis also should be read together with our financial statements and the notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

The following discussion contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements appear in a number of places in this Report, including, without limitation, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and requirements that are difficult to predict or are beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We strongly encourage investors to carefully read the factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in the section entitled “Risk Factors” for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements. We assume no responsibility to update the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The following should also be read in conjunction with the unaudited Financial Statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this report.

Business Development

Smartag International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Smartag,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), was formed as Theca Corporation on March 24, 1999 in Colorado. The Company is in the development stage as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 915. On November 29, 2004, we merged with Art4Love, Inc., a Delaware corporation, into Art4Love, Inc. a Nevada corporation. Art4love, Inc. attempted to sell and lease art to companies and individuals from artists’ collections worldwide. The Company ceased operations in December 2006.

On December 31, 2008, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement Chad Love Lieberman, the Company’s former majority stockholder and President, sold to Smartag Solutions Bhd. an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of Company common stock (the “Sale”) which amounted to 98.6% of the Company.

On February 19, 2009, Art4Love changed its name to Smartag International, Inc.

Business of Issuer

Currently, the Company seeks suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company has made no efforts to identify a possible business combination. As a result, the Company has not conducted negotiations or entered into a letter of intent concerning any target business. The business purpose of the Company is to seek the acquisition of, or merger with, an existing company. The Company selected December 31 as its fiscal year end.

- 13 -

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the officers and directors of the Company. As of this date, the Company has not entered into any definitive agreement with any party, nor have there been any specific discussions with any potential business combination candidate regarding business opportunities for the Company. The Company has unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In its efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, the Company will consider the following kinds of factors:

a)	Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

b)	Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

c)	Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;

d)	Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;

e)	The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

f)	The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

g)	The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

h)	Other relevant factors.

Form of Acquisition

- 14 -

The present stockholders of the Company will likely not have control of a majority of the voting securities of the Company following a reorganization transaction. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of the Company's directors may resign and one or more new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.

Results of Operation

For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no revenues from continuing operations. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance. It is management's assertion that these circumstances may hinder the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had a net loss of $21,667, as compared with a net loss of $41,664 for the corresponding period in 2009. The decreases in operating expense for the current period are mainly due to a decrease in consulting and travel expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following is a summary of the Company's cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

Six months ended June 30,

	2010			2009
Operating Activities	$	(12,917	)	$	(41,435	)
Investing Activities		-			-
Financing Activities		8,705			47,568
Net Effect on Cash	$	(4,212	)	$	6,133

In the current period ending June 30, 2010, the Company incurred a net loss of $21,667 which was offset by an increase in accounts payable for the period. For the period ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred a net loss of $41,664. The Company received proceeds from its secured revolving note payable, related party to cover its operational losses.

Going Concern

We currently have no source of operating revenue, and have only limited working capital with which to pursue our business plan, which contemplates the completion of a business combination with an operating company. The amount of capital required to sustain operations until the successful completion of a business combination is subject to future events and uncertainties. It may be necessary for us to secure additional working capital through loans or sales of common stock, and there can be no assurance that such funding will be available in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditor has issued a "going concern" qualification as part of his opinion in the Audit Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, and our unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 include a "going concern" footnote.

- 15 -

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The SEC has defined a company's critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company's financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances; however, actual results may vary from these estimates and assumptions. We have identified in Note 2 - "Summary of Accounting Policies" to the Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report certain critical accounting policies that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered material to investors.

Contractual Obligations

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item

Item 4T Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules, regulations and related forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.

- 16 -

PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

To the best knowledge of our sole officer and director, the Company is not a party to any legal proceeding or litigation.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item. See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission which identifies and discloses certain risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, those "Risk Factors" included in Item 1A of the Annual Report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

ITEM 6.	Exhibits
	31	Certification of President pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

- 17 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SMARTAG INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Date: August 13, 2010	/s/ PENG KEONG LIM
	Name: Peng Keong Lim
	Title: Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: August 13, 2010	/s/ SIM KAY WAH
	Name: Sim Kay Wah Title: Chief Financial Officer

- 18 -

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

- 19 -

Attached files

Smartag International, Inc. Reports

Also read