---

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [    ] to [    ]

Commission file number 000-52393

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	98-0494003
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1 Orchard, Suite 200, Lake Forest CA	92630
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:	949.748.8050

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
N/A	N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value of $0.001
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act.
Yes [   ]    No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
Yes [   ]    No [X]

---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
Yes [X]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [   ]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]	Accelerated filer                  [   ]
Non-accelerated filer   [   ]	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]    No [X]

State the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on October 31, 2009 was $5,850,000 based on a $0.13 closing price for the Common Stock on October 30, 2009. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

93,500,000 shares of common stock issued & outstanding as of August 13, 2010

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

2

---

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	14
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	21
Item 2.	Properties	21
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	21
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	21
Item 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	21
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	23
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	29
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	30
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	30
Item 9B.	Other Information	31
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	31
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	35
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	36
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	37
Item 14.	Principal Accountants Fees and Services	37
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	38

3

---

PART I

Item 1.             Business

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our company”, mean Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. a Nevada corporation, unless otherwise indicated.

Corporate History

We were incorporated on March 8, 2006, under the laws of the State of Nevada as "Pointstar Entertainment Corp." Effective September 28, 2007, we completed a merger with our subsidiary, "Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.", also a Nevada corporation. As a result, we changed our name from "Pointstar Entertainment Corp." to "Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc." Our stock symbol is "BSHF".

Our principal executive offices are located at 1 Orchard Drive, Suite 220, Lake Forest, CA 92630 and our telephone number is (949) 748-8050.

Since our incorporation, we had been in the process of establishing ourselves as a company that seeks to obtain distribution rights for television programming and movies from film studios, television network companies, and independent production houses. However, we were not successful in implementing our business plan and we considered various alternatives to ensure the viability and solvency of our company.

We do not have any subsidiaries.

Other than as set out herein, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

Our Current Business

On September 18, 2007, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Hans Bio Shaft Limited and Hassan Hans Badreddine, pursuant to which we acquired from Hans Bio Shaft U.K. Patent GB2390365 titled "Waste Water Treatment Plant and Method" and related United States and European patent applications for the design of a certain waste water treatment plant system. In consideration for the U.K. patent and related United States and European patent applications, we issued to Dr. Badreddine, the principal shareholder of Hans Bio Shaft, 27,000,000 restricted common shares of our common stock. In addition to the common shares, we paid Dr. Badreddine, a cash consideration in the amount of $750,000.

4

---

Furthermore, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement with Hans Bio Shaft and Dr. Badreddine, we agreed to pay Dr. Badreddine additional amounts of up to $1,750,000 on the following terms:

	(a)	$750,000 upon the due execution and delivery, within 90 days from the closing of the transactions contemplated under the asset purchase agreement, of contracts for the purchase of the waste water plant system in the aggregate amount of $6,000,000; and
	(b)	$1,000,000 upon the due execution and delivery, within 180 days from closing of the transactions contemplated under the asset purchase agreement, of additional contracts for the purchase of the waste water plant system in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000.

Subsequently, by written consent resolution of our directors effective March 12, 2008, we agreed to extend the date set out in paragraph (a) above to 365 days and the date set out in paragraph (b) above to 365 days.

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, on August 2, 2007, we closed a private placement consisting of 3,000,000 units of our securities at a price of $0.50 per unit for aggregate proceeds of $1,500,000. Each unit consisted of: (a) one common share; (b) one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one common share for a period of twenty-four months commencing from the closing of the Private Placement at an exercise price of $0.55 per common share; and (c) one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one common share for a period of thirty-six months commencing from the closing of the Private Placement at an exercise price of $0.60 per common share. We issued the units to a non-U.S. person (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the 1933 Act) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act.

Furthermore, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement with Hans Bio Shaft and Dr. Badreddine, our directors passed resolutions, whereby Dr. Badreddine was appointed as our president and a director as of September 18, 2008, and our corporate name was changed from "Pointstar Entertainment Corp." to "Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.", effective September 28, 2008.

With the completion of the asset purchase agreement, we changed our business to the business of designing and manufacturing domestic waste water treatment plant systems, using our patented Hans BioShaft unit – the Hans BioShaft System. We are currently engaged in a specific branch of waste water treatment known as domestic waste or sewage treatment. In the future, we plan to expand into the treatment of industrial waste.

On January 31, 2008, we entered into a teaming agreement with Rapid Impact Compaction Contracting LLC (RIC), a company based in Dubai, UAE. The agreement provides the basis for our company and RIC to jointly pursue sewage treatment projects in the Gulf Region, with exclusivity as to association in the UAE. Pursuant to the agreement with RIC, we will perform engineering and manufacturing services, provide our sewage treatment systems, supervise installation, start-up and commissioning thereof and assist RIC over a five-year period to develop a division within RIC that specializes in sewage treatment plants using our patented Hans BioShaft technology. RIC will sell, install and handle all construction matters, provide office space, in-country transportation and assist with business development. We will pay a commission payment to RIC of 5% of the contract value of sewage treatment plant contracts in respect of the Hans BioShaft technology.

On February 11, 2008, we entered into a license agreement with FPS International (FPS) based in the Kuwait. FPS was established in 1977 and is a leading provider in the Middle East of products and services for the water, oil and gas industries.

Pursuant to the license agreement with FPS, we had agreed to license the Hans BioShaft System to FPS for marketing and distribution in the Arab Gulf Countries Council and Egypt. In consideration for the grant of the license, FPS was to pay our company a royalty based on FPS’ annual gross revenues from the Hans BioShaft System, subject to a minimum annual royalty payment of $500,000.

5

---

Due to lack of payments of these royaly fees, the Licensing Agreement with FPS was terminated along with our relationship with FPS.

Our company has been chosen by the Mace group, a project management company with offices in Dubai, to bid on the Al Barari housing development in Dubai, UAE. The successful bidder will be required to install a waste water treatment plant capable of treating 32,000,000 cubic meters per day of tertiary and sewage.

We are in the process of bidding on the project as requested by the Mace group, a project management company with offices in Dubai.

The Al Barari development is being developed by Al Barari Development Company, a company founded by Mr. Zaal Mohamed Zaal in 2005 to provide high net worth individuals with innovative housing. Al Barari Development’s mission is to continuously raise the benchmark of the quality of property development in the UAE. through the development of eco-friendly sustainable communities and the implementation and utilization of new standards in estate planning, environment controls, and ongoing quality driven management.

Pursuant to a draft project construction contract between FPS International (FPS) and the municipality of Baghdad, the Hans BioShaft System has been selected as the technology for 13 domestic waste water treatment plants in the municipality of Baghdad in Iraq. The contract between FPS and the municipality of Baghdad is valued at $56 million and manufacturing, construction and installation of the plants by FPS is expected to begin after the new government is in place.

On August 11, 2008, we entered into a loan agreement with Premier Financial and Marketing Co. Ltd., in respect of the loan in the amount of $500,000 at the rate of interest of 15% per annum payable in full on August 11, 2009. The loan was used for general working capital purposes.

On November 11, 2008 we completed an sales agreement with RIC for a demo plant in Dubai, UAE. On July 14, 2009 completed the installation and commissioning the plant. This plant is for demo purposes. RIC paid 50% of the $100,000 cost.

On Dec 3, 2008 we received an order and down payment for a plant in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. On June 24, 2009 we completed the installation and commissioning of the plant sold in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

On February 10, 2009, we received our United States Patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office for our wastewater treatment plant and method. The patent number is 7,488,413. We currently hold a patent in the United Kingdom as well and we have filed a PCT application as well.

On February 27, 2009 we entered into a loan agreement with Imad Yassine, in respect of the loan in the amount of $75,000 at the rate of interest of 10% per annum payable in full on February 27, 2010. The loan is to be used for general working capital purposes. On February 27, 2010, the terms of this loan were extended for a period of 12 months and the loan is now due on February 27, 2011.

On March 6, 2009 we entered into a loan agreement with Premier Financial and Marketing Co. Ltd., in respect of the loan in the amount of $25,000 at the rate of interest of 15% per annum payable in full on March 6, 2010. The loan is to be used for general working capital purposes. On March 6, 2010, the terms of this loan were extended for a period of 12 months and the loan is now due on March 6, 2011.

On April 15, 2009 we completed the installation and commissioning of a pilot plant for the city of Wayne, Nebraska. If the test results are approved they will allow us to bid on a larger project to upgrade their existing municipal plant.

6

---

On June 8, 2009 we entered into a loan agreement with Imad Yassine, in respect of the loan in the amount of $25,000 at the rate of interest of 15% per annum payable in full on June 8, 2010. The loan is to be used for general working capital purposes. On June 8, 2010, the terms of this loan were extended for a period of 12 months and the loan is now due on June 8, 2011.

Principal Products

Our principal product is a domestic waste water treatment plant system. To date, there are currently 3 domestic waste water plants in use worldwide that use the BioShaft technology. This system is made using our patented Hans BioShaft unit. Hans BioShaft unit works by emulating and accelerating a natural process found in rivers. The waste water treatment plant system for which we use our Hans BioShaft unit is called the "Hans BioShaft System". The Hans BioShaft System comprises four treatment phases with Hans BioShaft unit being used in the second treatment phase. The four treatment phases are:

	(a)	Mechanical/Primary Treatment Phases (Pre-treatment phase) which includes:
		•	Delivery to the treatment
		•	Screening and maceration
	(b)	Biological/Secondary Treatment Phase which includes:
		•	Balance Tank (Aeration)
		•	Hans BioShaft units
		•	Clarification
	(c)	Tertiary Treatment Phase which includes:
		•	Effluent disinfection
	(d)	Sludge Treatment which includes:
		•	Biomass collecting tank (only for larger capacities >10,000 m3/day)

Figure 1

7

---

The Hans BioShaft System is an attached growth process for the biological treatment of the human (domestic) waste water. It is known that conventional suspended growth process requires large aeration and sedimentation volumes. These volumes can be reduced significantly with use of biomass carriers which have a high specific surface area. The application of a large number of biomass carriers instead of sedimentation by surface aeration has a positive effect on the efficiency and size of the required equipment.

The waste water enters the Hans BioShaft unit (see Figure 2) where it flows through the biological aeration filter chamber which contains the hollow plastic media (biomass carriers). Anoxic decomposition takes place on the inner surface (hollow area) of the biomass carrier, while on the outside, corrugated surface, the process is aerobic. This ensures a high level of sewage purification at fast speed.

The oxygen demand for the decomposition process is provided by the central air lift aerator. The air is supplied by a compressor and is dispersed by a special maintenance free membrane diffuser providing an enormous number of micro bubbles which saturate the sewage with oxygen and simultaneously force the sewage up to the surface. This oxygen rich fluid then passes back down through the aeration chamber in intimate contact with the carriers. Because the biomass carriers have a relative density less than unity they will always try to rise toward the surface, but are constantly forced downward under the pressure of the aerated sewage. These two forces ensure that there is constant upward and downward motion of the carriers within the aeration chamber.

8

---

Collision between the carriers will occur which will remove the excess microbial biomass by means of down current. This self-cleaning feature will protect the biological filter against any possible clogging, and makes the unit virtually maintenance free.

Treated water flows to final sedimentation compartment in the Hans BioShaft unit where suspended particles sink down to the bottom of the tank. This active biomass is then transferred back to the balance tank at periodic intervals by the airlift system which eliminates the need for sludge pumps.

Purified water rises up the outer compartment of the Hans BioShaft unit to the outlet and flows to the clarifier tank for final settlement and polishing before discharge. Any remaining biomass will settle to the bottom of the clarifier tank and will be periodically airlifted back to the balance tank.

Odors are eliminated due to the absorption of large quantities of oxygen in the system which converts odorous gases into dissolved chemicals.

On January 7, 2008, we launched a new product line of packaged domestic wastewater treatment systems ideal for emergency situations such as sewage overflow, system failure, natural disasters and military uses.

The new Hans BioShaft Packaged system is mobile and delivered ready for immediate installation. It is a pre-engineered, standard, packaged system designed as a complete domestic wastewater solution. The Hans BioShaft Packaged System is a compact and economic alternative that provides customers with a quick means of installation and commissioning in the event of a sewage emergency situation. The United States has many aging and overburdened sewage systems which result in regular sewage overflows and the Hans BioShaft Packaged System was designed for these emergency situations and can handle from 5,000 up to 30,000 gallons per day.

As of the date hereof, we have not announced any new products or services which have not been disclosed herein.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s own numbers, annual sewer overflows are staggering. For combined sewer systems, EPA estimates that 850 billion gallons of raw or partially treated sewage is discharged annually into local waters.

For separate sanitary sewer systems, the EPA estimates that between 23,000 and 75,000 sanitary sewage overflows occur per year in the United States, discharging a total volume of three to ten billion gallons per year. These discharges, laden with potentially harmful chemicals, pathogens, viruses, and bacteria, often wind up in local rivers and streams, city streets, parks, or in unfortunate cases, directly into peoples’ homes.

The Market

Our market for the Hans BioShaft System encompasses both the municipal and private sectors. We will make direct sales calls to private contractors and industrial companies. For municipal projects, it will be necessary to assign a local agent or who is familiar with the market and the environmental government entities. This effort will also be supported with trade shows, sales brochures, website and online marketing.

The potential market segments are:

• Middle East;
• United States;
• Central and Eastern Europe; and
• Asia.

9

---

Middle East Market Segment

Initially, we will target waste water operators of municipalities, land developers, and private enterprises in the Middle East and then move into international markets. Currently the countries in the Middle East are encountering severe water shortages, resulting from population growth caused by rapid economic development. We believe that, as water demand increases in the region, water efficiency will need to be improved in all sectors, including the agriculture sector, which is a major consumer of water in the Middle East.

United States Market Segment

We are headquartered in Lake Forest, California and we plan to focus on the United States market.

We believe the market trends in the United States favor us, particularly because we have many qualities that differentiate us from the competition, such as rapid manufacturing, lower costs, less space requirements and less odor emission. We believe the high costs for fresh water and tough discharge standards in the United States are forcing industries to seek cost effective methods to treat waste water and reuse it.

Central and Eastern European Market Segment

We plan to target the Central and Eastern European market segment. One of the biggest drivers in this steadily growing market is the European Union directive for candidate countries. European Union funding aims at assisting new member and candidate countries to improve the waste water infrastructure in their regions.

We believe that this market is very price sensitive, giving us a competitive advantage. The choice of treatment processes is often based on price. Price is more important in this market then the long term benefits of advanced treatment systems. Furthermore the low price equipment vendors in South Eastern Europe are offering stiff competition to suppliers coming in from the mature western markets. The key to success here is to adopt innovative pricing strategies such as Build Own Operate. The Build Own Operate method is expected to allow us to create cash flows for many years and secure positive income for our company.

We also plan to establish local partnerships and concentrate on niche regional markets such as treatment plants for smaller communities.

Asian Market Segment

We plan to target several countries in Asia, especially China and the Philippines.

In the Philippines market, we believe there is a large market for water and waste water treatment products and equipment and we expect it to grow over the next few years. We believe the best opportunities for U.S. exporters are products for municipal water systems.

The Philippine water and waste water problems can be attributed to staggering population growth and industrialization. The result of this is a booming market for water and waste water treatment products and equipment.

There are no restrictions on imports waste water treatment products and equipment. Tariff rates imposed on most waste water equipment range from 5% to 10%.

The other major market in Asia is the Chinese market. Currently, the percentage of foreign capital in the waste water treatment industry in China is low because of low level of Chinese government investment, lack of sewage standards, lack of sewage drainage networks, low sewage treatment prices.

10

---

However, in the coming years we expect the Chinese market to evolve and we believe that we can compete in this growing market due to the size of the market and close proximity of our manufacturing facilities, which are expected to be near Shanghai.

Competition

We believe the driving forces in the waste water treatment industry to be technology and the overall cost of the treatment system. Some important industry trends that we are currently well positioned for are a shift toward nonchemical and multi-barrier treatment and the use of package plants for smaller communities.

While there are many competitors providing waste water treatment systems, our major competitors are Zenon and Smith & Loveless. Smith & Loveless, in particular, has a technology called the membrane bio reactor. Even though there are many alternative technologies for sewage treatment, two major competing technologies for our Hans BioShaft System are the traditional technologies such as activated sludge and membrane reactor treatments.

We expect competition to become increasingly intensified in the future and there is no assurance that we can keep pace with the intense competition in this market. Many of our competitors have significantly greater brand recognition, customer bases, operating histories and financial and other resources. In addition, many companies have expanded the size of their operations by acquiring other complementary companies to form advantageous strategic alliances. Many of our competitors offer less effective but similar services at less cost than us and have the financial resources to create more attractive pricing.

The system we bring to the market has not been introduced previously. Because engineering professionals are generally cautious about recommending new products to the market if not familiar with them, we may have difficulties in gaining market share.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers

Our revenues are not dependent on one or a few major customers.

Raw Materials

We are not dependent on any one supplier for our raw materials.

Sales and Marketing

Initially, we intend to target waste water operators of municipalities, land developers, and private enterprises in the Middle East and then move into international markets. We will attempt to reach these segments through traditional marketing methodologies. These methodologies include attendance at business specific conferences, direct mailings of brochures, warm and cold calling, website and e-commerce approaches and advertisements in trade publications.

Besides direct sales effort to large users of our products, a major element of our marketing efforts will be to develop a network of 4 strategic alliances with several types of companies, including:

• contractors that specialize in the construction of water treatment plants;
• engineering firms that work with municipalities;
• firms that specialize in Build Own Operate project utilities;
• Chinese/Bahrain/Saudi manufacturers that we can outsource to.

Our marketing strategy will be to position ourselves as differentiated sewage treatment system provider. The primary goal of all marketing efforts will be to communicate these potential benefits to potential customers.

11

---

The sales strategy is to focus first on meeting the increased demand from our Middle East clients with whom Dr. Badreddine has established relationships for larger orders. These clients are critical to our ability to acquire additional accounts. Secondly we will focus on increasing the volume to the Middle East market. When we have reached maximum sales to existing channels we can then shift the majority of our focus to securing additional regions using our innovative contract pricing techniques such as Build Own Operate. This sales strategy is to concentrate on that segment of the market that can be most easily captured by our company.

Government Regulation

We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the sale and use of our product in the jurisdictions where our products are sold.

In the United States, the sale and provision of on-site commercial and domestic waste water treatment devices is regulated at the state level through product registration, advertising restrictions, water testing, product disclosure and other regulations specific to the water treatment industry. In addition, municipal governments such as cities and counties frequently can require more stringent regulation. The United States Environmental Protection Agency is generally not involved in the regulation of waste water treatment devices with flow rates less than 1,000 gallons per day. In some cases, industrial, municipal, and other facilities must obtain certain permits from governmental authorities.

Federal agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency, state agencies such as the Department of Health Services of various states, and local agencies such as regional pollution control boards, all have an interest in the quality of water discharged from sanitary sewer treatment plants. At a minimum, sewer treatment plants must protect the health and welfare of the local population by ensuring that raw or primary treated waste water does not contaminate the local potable water supply. At a maximum, some agencies must treat all inflows to tertiary standards, and then pump all treated water out of the drainage basin so that no effluent ever drains to a water supply.

Regulating agencies can compel sewer treatment enterprises to construct improvements to their plants by requiring higher standards in effluent quality. If not in compliance with regulations, sewer enterprises may be subject to heavy fines. Regulation is therefore often the driving force behind increasing sewer treatment costs in the United States,

Intellectual Property

We own the inventions covered by United Kingdom Patent GB2390365 titled "WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND METHOD". On February 10, 2009, we received our United States Patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office for our wastewater treatment plant and method. The patent number is 7,488,413. We also acquired the following related patent applications from Hans Bio Shaft Limited under the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Patent Assignment Agreement:

• PCT international patent application PCT/GB04/00002 (publication WO2005066081);
• European patent application EP20040700280 (publication EP1711440)

Although related, these patent applications are not linked by priority to our U.K. patent.

We intend to require our customers to enter into confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements before we disclose any sensitive aspects of our technologies or strategic plans, and we intend in the future to enter into proprietary information agreements with employees and consultants. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology. It is difficult, and can be expensive, to monitor unauthorized use of technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as laws in the United States and the United Kingdom. In addition, our competitors may independently develop technology similar to ours. Our precautions may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property.

12

---

No assurance can be given that any patents based on pending patent applications or any future patent applications by us, or any future licensors, will be issued, that the scope of any patent protection will exclude competitors or provide competitive advantages to us, that any of the provisional patent applications that have been or may be issued to us or our licensors will be held valid if subsequently challenged or that others will not claim rights in or ownership of the provisional patent applications and other proprietary rights held or licensed by us. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others have not developed or will not develop similar products, duplicate any of our technology or design around our patent or any patents that may be issued to us or our licensors.

Our success will also depend in part on our ability to commercialize our technology without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We have not conducted freedom of use patent searches and no assurance can be given that patents do not exist or could not be filed which would have an adverse affect on our ability to market our technology or maintain our competitive position with respect to our technology. If our technologies or subject matter are claimed under other existing United States or foreign patents or are otherwise protected by third party proprietary rights, we may be subject to infringement actions. In such event, we may challenge the validity of such patents or other proprietary rights or we may be required to obtain licenses from such companies in order to develop, manufacture or market our technology. There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such licenses or that such licenses, if available, may be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, the failure to either develop a commercially viable alternative or obtain such licenses may result in delays in marketing our technology or the inability to proceed with the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are required to defend ourselves against charges of patent infringement or to protect our proprietary rights against third parties, substantial costs will be incurred regardless of whether we are successful. Such proceedings are typically protracted with no certainty of success. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and force us to curtail or cease our development and commercialization of our technology.

Employees

Our company has retained 4 consultants including our President, Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Operations.

Research and Development

We have spent good amounts on which has been classified as research and development activities in our financial statements during the last two fiscal years. All the projects done so far are considered to be demo plants or pilots and a lot of research and development has been part of the scope of work.

Going Concern

We anticipate that additional funding will be required in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. At this time, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

Subsidiaries

We have do not have any subsidiaries.

REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We are not required to deliver an annual report to our stockholders but will voluntarily send an annual report, together with our annual audited financial statements upon request. We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.

13

---

The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

Item 1A.          Risk Factors

Much of the information included in this annual report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”. Such forward looking statements include any projections and estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements” involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of losses and no revenues, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

From inception to April 30, 2010, we have incurred aggregate net losses of $16,777,131 from operations. We can offer no assurance that we will ever operate profitably or that we will generate positive cash flow in the future. In addition, our operating results in the future may be subject to significant fluctuations due to many factors not within our control, such as the unpredictability of when customers will order products, the size of customers’ orders, the demand for our products, and the level of competition and general economic conditions.

Our company’s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. No assurance can be given that we may be able to operate on a profitable basis.

Due to the nature of our business and the early stage of our development, our securities must be considered highly speculative. We have not realized a profit from our operations to date and there is little likelihood that we wil lrealize any profits in the short or medium term. Any profitability in the future from our business will be dependent upon the successful commercialization or licensing of our core products, which themselves are subject to numerous risk factors as set forth below.

We expect to continue to incur development costs and operating costs. Consequently, we expect to incur operating losses and negative cash flows until our products gain market acceptance sufficient to generate a commercially viable and sustainable level of sales, and/or additional products are developed and commercially released and sales of such products made so that we are operating in a profitable manner. Our history of losses and no revenues raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have had negative cash flows from operations since inception. We will require significant additional financing, the availability of which cannot be assured, and if our company is unable to obtain such financing, our business may fail.

To date, we have had negative cash flows from operations and have depended on sales of our equity securities and debt financing to meet our cash requirements. We may continue to have negative cash flows. We have estimated that we will require approximately $250,000 to carry out our business plan for the next twelve months. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. We will require additional financing to finance working capital and pay for operating expenses and capital requirements until we achieve a positive cash flow.

14

---

Our ability to market and sell our waste water treatment plant system will be dependent upon our ability to raise significant additional financing. If we are unable to obtain such financing, we will not be able to fully develop our business. Specifically, we will need to raise additional funds to:

• support our planned growth and carry out our business plan;
• protect our intellectual property;
• hire top quality personnel for all areas of our business;
• address competing technological and market developments; and
• market and develop our technologies.

We may not be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing on acceptable terms as required. Even if financing is available, it may not be available on terms that are favorable to us or in sufficient amounts to satisfy our requirements. Any additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders. If we require, but are unable to obtain, additional financing in the future, we may be unable to implement our business plan and our growth strategies, respond to changing business or economic conditions, withstand adverse operating results and compete effectively. More importantly, if we are unable to raise further financing when required, we may be forced to scale down our operations and our ability to generate revenues may be negatively affected.

We have a limited operating history and if we are not successful in continuing to grow our business, then we may have to scale back or even cease our ongoing business operations.

We have no history of significant revenues from operations and have no significant tangible assets. We have yet to generate positive earnings and there can be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. We have only recently completed our acquisition of the U.K. patent in respect to the Hans BioShaft System and our company has limited operating history in the business of designing and manufacturing domestic waste water treatment plant system. Accordingly, we must be considered in the development stage. Our success is significantly dependent on a successful commercialization of our waste water treatment plant system. Our operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to develop a useful waste water treatment system or achieve commercial acceptance of our waste water treatment plant system or operate on a profitable basis. We are in the development stage and potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by enterprises in the development stage. If our business plan is not successful, and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in our company.

If we fail to effectively manage the growth of our company and the commercialization of our products and technology, our future business results could be harmed and our managerial and operational resources may be strained.

As we proceed with the commercialization of our products, technologies and the expansion of our marketing and commercialization efforts internationally, we expect to experience significant growth in the scope and complexity of our business. We will need to add staff to market our services, manage operations, handle sales and marketing efforts and perform finance and accounting functions. We anticipate that we will be required to hire a broad range of additional personnel in order to successfully advance our operations. This growth is likely to place a strain on our management and operational resources. The failure to develop and implement effective systems, or to hire and retain sufficient personnel for the performance of all of the functions necessary to effectively service and manage our potential business, or the failure to manage growth effectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

15

---

We do not have the ability to manufacture our product on a commercial scale and will need to rely on third-party manufacturers and other third parties for production of our products, and our dependence on these manufacturers may impair the development of our product candidates.

Currently, we do not have the ability to internally manufacture our product on a commercial scale. We are in the process of identifying manufacturers for long-term supply contracts of components and subassemblies of our product. There are several potential manufacturers capable of manufacturing components and subassemblies for our waste water treatment plant system. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully negotiate long-term agreements with any of such potential manufacturers at a reasonable price and on other acceptable terms.

If our third-party manufacturers fail to deliver our products on a timely basis, with sufficient quality, and at commercially reasonable prices, we may be required to delay, suspend or otherwise discontinue development and production of our product. While we may be able to identify replacement third-party manufacturers or develop our own manufacturing capabilities for our product, this process would likely cause a delay in the availability of our product and an increase in costs. We may also be required to enter into long-term manufacturing agreements that contain exclusivity provisions and/or substantial termination penalties. In addition, third-party manufacturers may have a limited number of facilities in which our product can be produced, and any interruption of the operation of those facilities due to events such as equipment malfunction or failure or damage to the facility by natural disasters could result in the cancellation of shipments, loss of product in the manufacturing process or a shortfall in available product.

We depend upon a number of third party suppliers for component parts for our products, and any disruption from such suppliers could prevent us from delivering our products to our customers within required timeframes or at scheduled prices, which could result in order cancellations and a decline in sales.

We assemble our products using materials and components procured from a number of third-party suppliers. If we fail to maintain our relationships with these suppliers, we may be unable to assemble our products or our products may be available only at a higher cost or after a long delay. We may be unable to obtain comparable materials and components from alternative suppliers. Our failure to obtain components that meet our quality, quantity, technological and cost requirements in a timely manner may interrupt or impair our ability to assemble our products or it may increase our manufacturing cost. We may be unable to identify new suppliers or qualify their products for use on our production lines in a timely manner and on commercially reasonable terms. Any of these factors could prevent us from delivering our products to our customers within required timeframes, and we may experience order cancellations which would adversely affect our business operations.

We may lose our competitiveness if we are not able to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights against infringement, and any related litigation may be time-consuming and costly.

Our success and ability to compete depends to a significant degree on our proprietary technology. If any of our competitors copy or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology or develop similar technologies independently, we may not be able to compete as effectively. The measures we have implemented to protect our proprietary technology and other intellectual property rights are currently based upon a combination of a patent, patent applications and trade secrets. These measures, however, may not be adequate to prevent the unauthorized use of our proprietary technology and our other intellectual property rights. Our pending patent applications may not result in the issuance of any patents or any issued patents that will offer protection against competitors with similar technology. Further, the laws of foreign countries may provide inadequate protection of such intellectual property rights. We may need to bring legal claims to enforce or protect such intellectual property rights. Any litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, may result in substantial costs and a diversion of our company’s resources. In addition, notwithstanding our rights to our intellectual property, other persons may bring claims against us alleging that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights or claims that our intellectual property rights are not valid. Any claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our attention and resources, result in the loss of goodwill associated with our business or require us to make changes to our technology.

16

---

The manufacture, use or sale of our waste water treatment plant system may infringe on the patent rights of others, and we may be forced to litigate if an intellectual property dispute arises.

If we infringe or are alleged to have infringed another party’s patent rights, we may be required to seek a license, defend an infringement action or challenge the validity of the patents in court. Patent litigation is costly and time consuming. We may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion. In addition, if we do not obtain a license, do not successfully defend an infringement action or are unable to have infringed patents declared invalid, we may:

• incur substantial monetary damages;
• encounter significant delays in marketing our waste water treatment plant system;
• be unable to conduct or participate in the manufacture, use or sale of our waste water treatment plant system;
• lose patent protection for our inventions and products; or
• find that our patents are unenforceable, invalid, or have a reduced scope of protection.

Parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive relief that could effectively block our ability to further develop or commercialize our waste water treatment plant system in United States, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia and Middle East and could result in the award of substantial damages. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any such license could substantially harm our company. Litigation, regardless of outcome, could result in substantial cost to and a diversion of efforts by our company.

Because our waste water treatment plant system has not been accepted as a recognized form of waste water treatment, we face significant barriers to acceptance of our services.

Our waste water treatment plant system has not been fully utilized in any particular market. The use of equipment such as ours is a relatively new form of waste water treatment. Traditionally, these services are provided through other treatment methodologies, such as chemicals or other aeration methods. Accordingly, we face significant barriers to overcome the consumer preferences of traditionally used treatment programs for the type of waste water treatment products and services that we offer.

Market acceptance of our products and services will depend in large part upon our ability to demonstrate the technical and operational advantages and cost effectiveness of our products and services as compared to alternative, competing products and services, and our ability to train customers concerning the proper use and application of our products. There can be no assurance that our products and services will achieve a level of market acceptance that will be profitable for us.

Our waste water treatment plant system may not achieve market acceptance at a level necessary for us to operate successfully.

Our waste water treatment plant system may not achieve market acceptance at a level necessary to enable production at a reasonable cost, to support the required sales and marketing effort, to effectively service and maintain, and to support continuing research and development costs. In addition, our waste water treatment plant system may:

• be difficult or overly expensive to produce;
• fail to achieve performance levels expected by customers;
• have a price level that is unacceptable in our targeted industries; or
• be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of others or other competitive forces.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully manufacture and market our waste water treatment plant system on a timely basis, achieve anticipated performance levels or throughputs, gain and maintain industry acceptance of our waste water treatment plant system or develop a profitable business. The failure to achieve any of these objectives would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

17

---

Because we face intense competition from larger and better-established companies that have more resources than we do, we may be unable to implement our business plan or increase our revenues.

The market for our waste water treatment products and services is intensely competitive and highly fragmented. Many of these competitors may have longer operating histories, greater financial, technical and marketing resources, and enjoy existing name recognition and customer bases. New competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. In addition, new technologies likely will increase the competitive pressures we face. Competitors may be able to respond more quickly to technological change, competitive pressures, or changes in consumer demand. As a result of their advantages, our competitors may be able to limit or curtail our ability to compete successfully.

In addition, many of our large competitors may offer customers a broader or superior range of services and technologies. Some of our competitors may conduct more extensive promotional activities and offer lower commercialization and licensing costs to customers than we do, which could allow them to gain greater market share or prevent us from establishing and increasing our market share. Increased competition may result in significant price competition, reduced profit margins or loss of market share, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues and successfully operate our business. Our competitors may develop technologies superior to those that our company currently possess. In the future, we may need to decrease our prices if our competitors lower their prices. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and customer requirements. Such competition will potentially affect our chances of achieving profitability, and ultimately affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we will incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our products.

We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that an individual is harmed because of the failure of our products to function properly. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against the product liability claim, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

• decreased demand for our products;
• injury to our reputation;
• costs of related litigation;
• substantial monetary awards to plaintiffs;
• loss of revenues; and
• the inability to commercialize our technologies.

We currently carry no product liability insurance. Although we expect to obtain product liability insurance coverage in connection with the commercialization of our products, such insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or such insurance, even if obtained, may not adequately cover any product liability claim. A product liability or other claim with respect to uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

Products which incorporate our waste water treatment technology will be subject to extensive regulation, which can be costly and time-consuming and could subject us to unanticipated delays or prevent us from obtaining the required approvals to commercialize our products.

Before we can market and sell products which incorporate our waste water treatment technology in the United States and abroad, extensive regulatory testing, inspection and approvals may be required. The regulatory process can be costly and time consuming. Our products which incorporate the waste water treatment technology may not receive necessary regulatory approval. Even if these products receive approval, the approval process might delay marketing and sale of our products, which may lead to a failure to meet our sales projections.

18

---

We will be subject to laws, regulations and other procedures with respect to government procurement.

Because we plan to sell some of our products to government agencies, we will be subject to laws, regulations and other procedures that govern procurement and contract implementation by those agencies. These agencies are likely to impose vendor qualification requirements, such as requirements with respect to financial condition, insurance and history. We have limited experience with government procurement and cannot assure you that we will be able to meet existing or future procurements laws, regulations and procedures or that we will be able to qualify as a vendor.

Substantially all of our assets and a majority of our directors and officers are outside the United States, with the result that it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or any of our directors or officers.

Although we are organized under the laws of the State of Nevada, United States, a majority of our directors and our officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce judgments against us that are obtained in the United States in any action, including actions predicated upon civil liability provisions of federal securities laws. In addition, as the majority of our assets are located outside of the United States, it may be difficult to enforce United States bankruptcy proceedings against us. Under bankruptcy laws in the United States, courts typically have jurisdiction over a debtor’s property, wherever it is located, including property situated in other countries. Courts outside of the United States may not recognize the United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, you may have trouble administering a United States bankruptcy case involving a Nevada company as debtor with most of its property located outside the United States. Any orders or judgments of a bankruptcy court obtained by you in the United States may not be enforceable.

Our by-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

Our by-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all expenses, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by him or her in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which they were made parties by reason of his or her being or having been one of our directors or officers.

Currency translation and transaction risk may negatively affect our net sales, cost of sales and gross margins, and could result in exchange losses.

Although our reporting currency is the United States dollar, we intend to conduct our business and incur costs in the local currency of the other countries in which we intend to operate. Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the United States dollar could affect our net sales and cost of sales figures, and could result in exchange losses. In addition, we incur currency transaction risk whenever we enter into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a dollar currency other than the United States.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital, it may adversely impact our ability to continue operations and we may go out of business.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because we may attempt to acquire a significant portion of the funds we need in order to conduct our planned operations through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be detrimental to our liquidity and our operations because the decline may cause investors to not choose to invest in our stock. If we are unable to raise the funds we require for all of our planned operations, we may be forced to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may suffer a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. As a result, our business may suffer and not be successful and we may go out of business. We also might not be able to meet our financial obligations if we cannot raise enough funds through the sale of our common stock and we may be forced to go out of business.

19

---

If we issue additional shares in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing shareholders.

We are authorized to issue up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 25,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more businesses or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares will result in a reduction of the book value and market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all current shareholders. Further, such issuance may result in a change of control of our company.

Trading on the OTC Bulletin Board may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board service of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Trading in stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC Bulletin Board is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTC Bulletin Board is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ or a stock exchange like Amex. Accordingly, shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations and FINRA’s sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in, and limit the marketability of, our common stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock.

20

---

OTHER RISKS

Trends, Risks and Uncertainties

We have sought to identify what we believe to be the most significant risks to our business, but we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks that might arise. Investors should carefully consider all of such risk factors before making an investment decision with respect to our common stock.

Item 1B.          Unresolved Staff Comments

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2.             Properties

We do not own any real property. Our principal business offices are located at 1 Orchard, Suite 200, Lake Forest CA 92630. We currently lease our space at an annual cost of $24,692. We believe that our current lease arrangements provide adequate space for our foreseeable future needs.

Item 3.             Legal Proceedings

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

Item 4.             [Removed and Reserved]

PART II

Item 5.             Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

21

---

⁽¹⁾ Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Our common shares are issued in registered form. Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501 (Telephone: 775-322-0626; Facsimile: 775-322-5623) is the registrar and transfer agent for our common shares

On August 3, 2010, the list of stockholders for our shares of common stock showed 30 registered stockholders and 93,500,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

Dividends

We have not declared any dividends on our common stock since the inception of our company on March 8, 2006. There is no restriction in our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws that will limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. However, we do not anticipate declaring and paying dividends to our shareholders in the near future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

On December 15, 2007 we adopted a stock option plan. This plan has not been approved by our security holders. Under the terms of the plan, our company can issue, in aggregate, up to a total of 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

The following table provides a summary of the securities authorized for issuance under Equity Compensation Plans, the weighted average price and number of securities remaining available for issuance, all as at April 30, 2010.

			Number of securities
			remaining available for
	Number of securities		future issuance under
	to be issued upon	Weighted average	equity compensation
	exercise of	exercise price of	plans (excluding
	outstanding options,	outstanding options,	securities reflected in
Plan category	warrants and rights	warrants and rights	column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	N/A	N/A	N/A
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	6,250,000	$ 0.30	6,000,000
Total	6,250,000	$   0.30	6,000,000

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during the year ended April 30, 2010.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

22

---

Item 6.             Selected Financial Data

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7.             Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes for the years ended April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009 that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this registration statement, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 14 of this annual report.

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Plan of Operation

During the next twelve month period, we intend to :

	(a)	penetrate the waste water treatment industry worldwide by stressing the cost advantages and space saving capabilities of the Hans BioShaft System;
	(b)	build up a network of strategic alliances with several types of companies, including contractors that specialize in the construction of water treatment plants, engineering firms that work with municipalities and firms that specialize in "build own operate" project utilities;
	(c)	form a partnership with a Chinese manufacturer that we can outsource to, and fabricate up to 2 Hans BioShaft units per month within the first 3 months;
	(d)	implement our pilot project in Southern California where we will setup and operate a packaged unit in order to complete the municipal permitting process for the California commission on environmental quality; and
	(e)	fill the positions of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Marketing and three sales engineers.

Not accounting for our working capital deficit of $1,349,046, we require additional funds of approximately $500,000 at a minimum to proceed with our plan of operation over the next twelve months. As we do not have the funds necessary to cover our projected operating expenses for the next twelve month period, we will be required to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, through loans or through debt financing. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising the required capital or that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. We intend to fulfill any additional cash requirement through the sale of our equity securities.

If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.

Capital Expenditures

We do not intend to invest in capital expenditures during the twelve-month period ending April 30, 2010.

23

---

General and Administrative Expenses

We expect to spend $250,000 during the twelve-month period ending April 30, 2010 on general and administrative expenses including legal and auditing fees, rent, office equipment and other administrative related expenses.

Product Research and Development

We do not anticipate expending any funds on research and development, manufacturing and engineering over the twelve months ending April 30, 2010.

Personnel Plan

We do not expect any material changes in the number of employees over the next 12 month period (although we may enter into employment or consulting agreements with our officers or directors). We do and will continue to outsource contract employment as needed.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended April 30, 2010 and 2009

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.

Our operating results for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

Revenues

Our revenues for the year ended April 30, 2010 were $29,000, compared to our revenue for the year ended April 30, 2009, which were $50,000, representing approximately a 42% decrease.

Cost of Sales

Our cost of sales for the year ended April 30, 2010 were $18,132 (62% of product sales), compared to our cost of sales for the year ended April 30, 2010, which were $50,000 (100% of product sales). The decrease in our cost of sales is mainly due to less overall sales volume. We expect that our cost of sales will increase over the next twelve months, mainly due to increased sales volume in the upcoming fiscal year.

Future cost of sales may be impacted by the effects of inflation and changing prices from our suppliers and fluctuations in foreign currency rates as certain costs are incurred in foreign currencies.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for the year ended April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009 are outlined in the table below:

24

---

The decrease in operating expenses for the year ended April 30, 2010, compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was mainly due to an overall decrease in activity in the company due to lack of funding.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

As of April 30, 2010, our total assets were $118,012 and our total current liabilities were $1,363,193 and we had a working capital deficit of $1,349,046. Our financial statements report a net loss of $651,760 for the year ended April 30, 2010, and a net loss of $16,777,131 for the period from March 8, 2006 (date of inception) to April 30, 2010.

We have suffered recurring losses from operations. The continuation of our company is dependent upon our company attaining and maintaining profitable operations and raising additional capital as needed. In this regard we have raised additional capital through equity offerings and loan transactions.

Cash Flows

We had cash in the amount of $14,147 as of April 30, 2010 as compared to $Nil as of April 30, 2009. We had a working capital deficit of $1,349,046 as of April 30, 2010 compared to working capital deficit of $907,855 as of April 30, 2009.

Our principal sources of funds have been from sales of our common stock.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Going Concern

The audited financial statements included with this annual report have been prepared on the going concern basis which assumes that adequate sources of financing will be obtained as required and that our assets will be realized and liabilities settled in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the consolidated audited financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

25

---

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Inflation

The effect of inflation on our revenue and operating results has not been significant.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our audited financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our consolidated financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. The more significant areas requiring the use of estimates include asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax amounts. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Reclassifications
Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statements.

Intangible Assets

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144” or “ASC 360”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations for a Disposal of a Segment of a Business.” The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used in accordance with SFAS 144. SFAS 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost of disposal.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instrument consists of an amount due to stockholder.

26

---

Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of computer equipment, an automobile and demonstration equipment and is recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as outlined in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104 or ASC 605-10), which requires that four basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the price is fixed or determinable; (iii) collectability is reasonably assured; and (iv) product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. Revenue from the sale of products is generally recognized after both the goods are shipped to the customer and acceptance has been received, if required. Our products are custom made for our customers, who primarily consist of original engineer manufacturers (OEMs), and we do not accept returns. Our products are shipped complete and ready to be incorporated into higher level assemblies by our customers. The terms of the customer arrangements generally pass title and risk of ownership to the customer at the time of shipment.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” (ASC 718). SFAS No. 123R establishes the accounting for grants of stock options and other transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R (1) revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (2) supersedes Accounting Principles Bulletin (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and (3) establishes fair value as the measurement objective for share-based payment transactions. The Company is following the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and has recorded compensation expenses related to the granting of stock options to employees.

Income Taxes

The Company provides for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect currently. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No provision for income taxes is included in the statement due to its immaterial amount, net of the allowance account, based on the likelihood of the Company to utilize the loss carry-forward.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128 or ASC 260), “Earnings per share”. SFAS No. 128 superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net income (loss) per share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Basic and diluted loss per share were $0.01 and $0.11 for the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, accounts receivable and other receivables arising from its normal business activities. The Company places its cash in what it believes to be credit-worthy financial institutions. The Company has a diversified customer base. The Company controls credit risk related to accounts receivable through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures.

27

---

The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, based upon factors surrounding the credit risk, establishes an allowance, if required, for uncollectible accounts and, as a consequence, believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowance is limited.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) during the year ended November 30, 2009 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements as of that date. In connection with the preparation of the accompanying financial statements as of April 30, 2010, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the SEC).

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. (“SFAS 168” or ASC 105-10) SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) establishes the Codification as the sole source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) was prospectively effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending on or after September 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) on July 1, 2009 did not impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. The Codification did not change GAAP, however, it did change the way GAAP is organized and presented.

As a result, these changes impact how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their significant accounting policies. The Company implemented the Codification in this Report by providing references to the Codification topics alongside references to the corresponding standards.

With the exception of the pronouncements noted above, no other accounting standards or interpretations issued or recently adopted are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, operations or cash flows.

Item 7A.           Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

28

---

Item 8.             Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

The following audited financial statements are filed as part of this annual report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Audited Balance Sheets as at April 30, 2010 and 2009.

Audited Statements of Operations for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.

Audited Statement of Stockholders' Deficit as of April 30, 2010.

Audited Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.

Notes to the Financial Statements.

29

---

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080
Fax (248) 281-0940
30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586
www.sucpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.
Lake Forest, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc., as of April 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements for the period March 8, 2006 (Inception) through April 30, 2009. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period March 8, 2006 (Inception) through April 30, 2010, insofar as it relates to the amounts for prior periods through April 30, 2009, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. The financial statements of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. as of and for the year ended April 30, 2009 and for the period from March 8, 2006 (Date of Inception) to April 30, 2009 were audited by other auditors whose report dated August 11, 2009 on those statements included an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc., as of April 30, 2010 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations, has negative working capital and is in need of additional capital to grow its operations so that it can become profitable. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are described in Note 8. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Bingham Farms, Michigan
August 11, 2010

F-1

30

---

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc.
(Formerly Poinstar Entertainment Corp.)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc. as of April 30, 2009 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the year ended April 30, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards required that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of April 30, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended April 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company had accumulated deficit of $16,125,371 as of April 30, 2009 and incurred a net loss of 903,433 during the year ended April 30, 2009. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are described in Note 7. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

August 11, 2009
/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.

Certified Public Accountants
Los Angeles, California

F-2

31

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF APRIL 30, 2010 AND 2009

		April 30,			April 30,
		2010			2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,147		$	25,560
Inventory		-			63,637
Other current assets		-			1,299
Total Current Assets		14,147			90,496
Property and equipment – net		51,617			26,883
Other Assets
Deposits		2,248			4,939
Investment		50,000			50,000
Total Other Assets		52,248			54,939
TOTAL ASSETS	$	118,012		$	172,318
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Customer deposit	$	16,000		$	18,950
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		722,193			379,401
Loans payable		525,000			525,000
Loans payable – related party		100,000			75,000
Total Current Liabilities		1,363,193			998,351
Stockholders’ Deficit
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized,     93,500,000 issued and outstanding (90,000,000 – 2009)		93,500			90,000
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized,     none issued and outstanding		-			-
Additional paid-in capital		15,438,450			15,209,338
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(16,777,131	)		(16,125,371	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(1,245,181	)		(826,033	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	118,012		$	172,318

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

F-3

32

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 8, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO APRIL 30, 2010

		Year			Year			Period from
		Ended			Ended			March 8, 2006
		April 30,			April 30,			(Inception) to
		2010			2009			April 30, 2010
REVENUES	$	29,000		$	50,000		$	79,000
COST OF SALES		18,132			50,000			68,132
GROSS PROFIT		10,868			-			10,868
OPERATING EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization		24,200			14,537			1,824,602
Impairment of assets		-			-			12,483,903
General and administrative		483,456			760,776			2,028,234
Stock-based compensation		57,612			57,611			291,983
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		565,268			832,923			16,628,722
NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(554,400	)		(832,923	)		(16,617,854	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other income		7,200			-			7,200
Interest expense		(104,560	)		(70,510	)		(166,477	)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(97,360	)		(70,510	)		(159,277	)
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(651,760	)		(903,433	)		(16,777,131	)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		0			0			0
NET LOSS	$	(651,760	)	$	(903,433	)	$	(16,777,131	)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		90,941,096			90,000,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

F-4

33

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 8, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO APRIL 30, 2010

											Deficit
											Accumulated			Total
											during the			Stockholders’
		Common Stock						Additional Paid			Development			Equity
		Shares			Amount			in Capital			Stage			(Deficit)
Inception, March 8, 2006		-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Initial capitalization
Sale of common stock		240,000,000			4,000			11,000			-			15,000
Net loss for the period		-			-			-			(4,077	)		(4,077	)
Balance, April 30, 2006		240,000,000			4,000			11,000			(4,077	)		10,923
Sale of common stock		30,000,000			500			49,500			-			50,000
Net loss for year		-			-			-			(35,730	)		(35,730	)
Balance, April 30, 2007		270,000,000			4,500			60,500			(39,807	)		25,193
Effect of forward stock split		-			265,500			(265,500	)		-			-
Returned to treasury		(210,000,000	)		(210,000	)		210,000			-			-
Shares issued for cash		3,000,000			3,000			1,496,967			-			1,499,967
Shares issued for patent purchase		27,000,000			27,000			13,473,000			-			13,500,000
Stock based compensation		-			-			176,760			-			176,760
Net loss for the year		-			-			-			(15,182,132	)		(15,182,132	)
Balance, April 30, 2008		90,000,000			90,000			15,151,727			(15,221,939	)		19,788
Stock based compensation		-			-			57,611			-			57,611
Net loss for the year		-			-			-			(903,433	)		(903,433	)
Balance, April 30, 2009		90,000,000			90,000			15,209,338			(16,125,371	)		(826,033	)
Shares issued for cash		3,500,000			3,500			171,500			-			175,000
Stock-based compensation		-			-			57,612			-			57,612
Net loss for the year		-			-			-			(651,760	)		(651,760	)
Balance, April 30, 2010		93,500,000		$	93,500		$	15,438,450		$	(16,777,131	)	$	(1,245,181	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

F-5

34

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 8, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO APRIL 30, 2010

		Year			Year			Period from
		Ended			Ended			March 8, 2006
		April 30,			April 30,			(Inception) to
		2010			2009			April 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period	$	(651,760	)	$	(903,433	)	$	(16,777,131	)
Adjustments To Reconcile Net Loss To Net Cash Used In
Operating Activities
Impairment of assets		-			-			12,483,903
Depreciation and amortization		24,200			14,537			1,824,602
Stock-based compensation		57,612			57,611			291,983
Change in operating assets & liabilities
Decrease in other current assets		1,299			4,377			-
(Increase) decrease in inventory		14,703			(63,637	)		-
(Increase) decrease in deposits		2,691			-			(2,248	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		342,792			271,265			722,193
Increase (decrease) in customer deposit		(2,950	)		18,950			16,000
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(211,413	)		(600,330	)		(1,440,698	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in joint venture		-			(50,000	)		(50,000	)
Purchase of equipment		-			(4,310	)		(110,072	)
Purchase of patent		-			-			(750,083	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(54,310	)		(910,155	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from loans payable		-			525,000			525,000
Proceeds from loans payable – related party		25,000			75,000			100,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		175,000			-			1,740,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		200,000			600,000			2,365,000
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period		(11,413	)		(54,640	)		14,147
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period		25,560			80,200			-
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	14,147		$	25,560		$	14,147
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Reclassification of inventory to demonstration equipment	$	48,934		$	-		$	48,934

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

F-6

35

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 1. GENERAL ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

The Company was originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on March 8, 2006. The Company owns world wide patented technology and is in the business of designing, manufacturing and installing wastewater (sewage) treatment plants using its technology.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES

Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. The more significant areas requiring the use of estimates include asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax amounts. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Reclassifications
Certain accounts and financial statement captions in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statements.

Intangible Assets
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144” or “ASC 360”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations for a Disposal of a Segment of a Business.” The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used in accordance with SFAS 144. SFAS 144 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost of disposal.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instrument consists of deposits, investments, customer deposits, accounts payable and accrued expenses, loans payable and loans payable to a related party.

The amount due to stockholder is non interest-bearing. It is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its other financial instruments and that their fair values approximate their carrying values except where separately disclosed.

Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of computer equipment, an automobile and demonstration equipment and is recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

36

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as outlined in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104 or ASC 605-10), which requires that four basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the price is fixed or determinable; (iii) collectability is reasonably assured; and (iv) product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. Revenue from the sale of products is generally recognized after both the goods are shipped to the customer and acceptance has been received, if required. Our products are custom made for our customers, who primarily consist of original engineer manufacturers (OEMs), and we do not accept returns. Our products are shipped complete and ready to be incorporated into higher level assemblies by our customers. The terms of the customer arrangements generally pass title and risk of ownership to the customer at the time of shipment.

Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” (ASC 718). SFAS No. 123R establishes the accounting for grants of stock options and other transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R (1) revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (2) supersedes Accounting Principles Bulletin (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and (3) establishes fair value as the measurement objective for share-based payment transactions. The Company is following the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and has recorded compensation expenses related to the granting of stock options to employees.

Income Taxes
The Company provides for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect currently. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No provision for income taxes is included in the statement due to its immaterial amount, net of the allowance account, based on the likelihood of the Company to utilize the loss carry-forward.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128 or ASC 260), “Earnings per share”. SFAS No. 128 superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net income (loss) per share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Basic and diluted loss per share were $0.01 and $0.01 for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, accounts receivable and other receivables arising from its normal business activities. The Company places its cash in what it believes to be credit-worthy financial institutions. The Company has a diversified customer base. The Company controls credit risk related to accounts receivable through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, based upon factors surrounding the credit risk, establishes an allowance, if required, for uncollectible accounts and, as a consequence, believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowance is limited.

37

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES (CONTINUED)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 165 (ASC 855-10) during the year ended November 30, 2009 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements as of that date. In connection with the preparation of the accompanying financial statements as of November 30, 2009, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the SEC).

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. (“SFAS 168” or ASC 105-10) SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) establishes the Codification as the sole source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) was prospectively effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending on or after September 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS 168 (ASC 105-10) on July 1, 2009 did not impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. The Codification did not change GAAP, however, it did change the way GAAP is organized and presented.

As a result, these changes impact how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their significant accounting policies. The Company implemented the Codification in this Report by providing references to the Codification topics alongside references to the corresponding standards.

With the exception of the pronouncements noted above, no other accounting standards or interpretations issued or recently adopted are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, operations or cash flows.

NOTE 3. INVESTMENT

During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company entered into a contract with a third party whereby it agreed to split the cost of producing a waste water treatment plant. The third party is responsible for and will incur all costs and risks to do with the operations and maintenance of the plant while the Company is responsible for technology support and engineering of the plant. In addition, the third party agrees to market and sell the plant and profit will be split at the time the plant is sold to end-user. Costs for the project are split evenly between the two parties and treated as capital contribution to the joint venture. As of April 30, 2010 and 2009, the company has recorded $50,000 in investment. The Company reviewed its carrying cost of this investment at April 30, 2010 and has determined that it is not impaired.

NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following at April 30, 2010 and April 30, 2009:

During the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, the company recorded depreciation expense of $24,200 and $14,537, respectively.

38

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 5. PATENTS ACQUISITION AND IMPAIRMENT OF PATENT

On September 18, 2007, the Company acquired certain patents for Waste Water Treatment Plant and Method in exchange for $750,083 cash and 27,000,000 shares, during the year-ended April 30, 2008. The shares were valued at $13,500,000 which was the fair market value on the date of acquisition. The patents will be amortized over the useful life of 5 years.

The Company evaluates intangible assets and other long-lived assets for impairment, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and goodwill is measured by comparing their net book value to the related projected undiscounted cash flows from these assets, considering a number of factors including past operating results, budgets, economic projections, market trends and product development cycles. If the net book value of the asset exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is considered impaired, and a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The Company assessed the carrying value of patents in accordance with the requirements of SFAS #142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (ASC 350). Based on its assessment, the Company determined that $12,483,903 of patents relating to Waste Water Treatment Plant and Method is impaired at April 30, 2008, due to uncertainty about recovery of projected cash flow from the patent.

NOTE 6. LOANS PAYABLE

On August 11, 2008, the Company secured a loan payable of $500,000 accruing interest at 15%, secured by the assets of the company, subject to a 3% financing fee and repayable on the one year anniversary date of the agreement. The term of this loan has been extended to August 11, 2011.

On March 6, 2009, the Company secured a loan payable of $25,000 accruing interest at 15%, due March 6, 2010 and secured by the assets of the company. As of April 30, 2010, the loan has not been repaid and the Company has renegotiated an additional term of eighteen months with the same terms of the original agreement. The term of this loan has been extended to September 6, 2011.

Interest expense on the above notes was $94,560 for the year ended April 30, 2010.

NOTE 7. LOANS PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

On February 27, 2009, the Company secured a loan payable from a related party for $75,000 accruing interest at 15%, due February 27, 2010 and secured by the assets of the company. The term of the loan has been extended to February 27, 2011.

On June 8, 2009, the Company secured a loan payable from a related party for $25,000 accruing interest at 15%, due June 8, 2010 and secured by the assets of the company. The term of the loan has been extended to June 8, 2011.

Interest expense on the above notes was $10,000 for the year ended April 30, 2010.

NOTE 8. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has net losses for the period from inception to January 31, 2010 of $16,777,131. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to meet its obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Management is planning to raise additional funds through an equity offering. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these efforts.

39

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Authorized

The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock and 25,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. All common stock shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company. The preferred shares may be issued in series, with the powers, rights and limitations of the preferred shares to be determined by the Board.

On June 14, 2007, the Nevada Secretary of State accepted for filing a Certificate of Amendment increasing the Company’s authorized common stock from 25,000,000 with a par value of $0.001 to 300,000,000 with a par value of $0.001. The amendment was approved by the shareholders and directors on May 21, 2007.

On July 10, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a 60 for one (1) forward stock split of issued and outstanding shares of common stock. In connection with the forward stock split, the issued and outstanding shares increased from 4,500,000 to 270,000,000.

Issued and Outstanding

On March 8, 2006 (inception), the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock to its Directors for cash of $15,000.

On August 22, 2007, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its common stock for cash of $1.5 million. The shares were part of a unit comprising of one share and two warrants. The warrants have exercise prices of $0.55 and $0.60.

On August 24, 2007 the Company cancelled 210,000,000 shares of its common stock and these shares were returned to treasury.

On September 18, 2007, the Company issued 27,000,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for the rights to the Waste Water Treatment Plant and Method. These shares have been valued at the fair market value on the date of acquisition of $0.50 per share for total proceeds of $13,500,000.

On March 1, 2010, the Company issued 3,500,000 at $0.05 per share for total proceeds of $175,000.

Stock-Based Compensation

On October 24, 2007, the Company granted 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.50 to a consultant in exchange for corporate communications services to be rendered by the consultant. These options were vested on the date of grant.

On January 21, 2008, the Company granted 150,000 options to a consultant for management and marketing services at an exercise price of $0.50 which have a vesting schedule extending over a period of 3 years from the date of grant. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value stock options granted. The Black- Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The model requires management to make estimates, which are subjective and may not be representative of actual results. Assumptions used to determine the fair value of the stock-based compensation is as follows:

The grant-date fair value of the options granted on January 21, 2008 was $1.15 and the grant-date fair value of the options issued on October 24, 2007 was $1.62. Total stock-based compensation for the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 was $57,612 and $57,611, respectively, and $291,983 from the period of inception to April 30, 2010.

40

---

BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Formerly Pointstar Entertainment Corp.)
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2010

NOTE 10. COMMITMENT

Operating Leases

In April 2009, Company entered into a lease for a new facility, commencing May 5, 2009. The lease expires on May 4, 2013 and carries a base rent of $24,692 per year.

The Company has the following rent commitment for the years ended April 30:

NOTE 11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On March 8, 2006 (inception), the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock to its Directors for cash of $15,000.During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company entered into a verbal loan agreement with an officer of the Company, whereby, the Company borrowed $75,000 at a finance charge of 4.99% per year. The Company paid off the loan during the period ended January 31, 2009.

During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company also entered into a loan agreement with an officer of the Company, whereby, the Company borrowed $75,000 at an interest rate of 10% per year. The term of the loan has been extended until February 27, 2011.

During the year ended April 30, 2010, the Company also entered into a loan agreement with an officer of the Company, whereby, the Company borrowed $25,000 at an interest rate of 10% per year. The term of the loan has been extended until June 8, 2011.

The Company incurred $90,000, $90,000 and $102,000 in consulting fees to the president, the COO and the COO’s son, consecutively during the year ended April 30, 2010. As of April 30, 2010, $116,500, $135,000 and $76,723 were due to the President, the COO of the Company and the COO’s son, respectively for their consulting fees and these amounts were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses of the accompanying financial statements.

Interest expense on the note payable – related party was $10,000 for the year ended April 30, 2010.

As of April 30, 2010, $1,552 was payable to a company controlled by the COO.

NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through August 12, 2010, the date on which the financial statements were issued, and has determined it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

41

---

Item 9.             Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On March 12, 2010, our board of directors dismissed Kabani & Company, Inc., our independent registered public accounting firm. On March 12, 2010, the accounting firm of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, was engaged as our new independent registered public accounting firm. Our board of directors and our audit committee approved of the dismissal of Kabani & Company, Inc. and the engagement of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, as our independent auditor. The report of Kabani & Company, Inc. for the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that our audited financial statements contained in our Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended 2009 and 2008, contained a going concern qualification in the registrant's audited financial statements.

During our two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods thereto, there were no disagreements with Kabani & Company, Inc. whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to Kabani & Company, Inc.’s satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on our financial statements.

On March 12, 2010, we engaged Silberstein Ungar, PLLC as our independent accountant. During the two most recent fiscal years and the interim periods preceding the engagement, we had not consulted with Silberstein Ungar, PLLC regarding any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A.           Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president (who is acting as our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As of April 30, 2010, the end of our fiscal year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president (who is acting as our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president (who is acting as our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control include providing management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2010. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of April 30, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles. Our management reviewed the results of their assessment with our Board of Directors.

42

---

Inherent limitations on effectiveness of controls

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors. Internal control over financial reporting is a process which involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three month period ended April 30, 2010 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B.           Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.           Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

All of the directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

			Date First Elected
Name	Position Held with the Company	Age	or Appointed
Hassan Hans Bedreddine	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	58	September 18, 1007
Imad Kamel Yassine	Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director	61	August 14, 2007
Bashar Amin	Vice President of Operations	50	June 2, 2008

43

---

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person's principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

Hassan Hans Badreddine – President, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Hassan Hans Badreddine was appointed as President, Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of our company on September 18, 2007.

Dr. Badreddine received his Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the technical university of Aachen, Germany. He worked in the water and waste water business since 1980. He was an assistant engineer at the University of Aachen until 1978, and was active in many countries including Europe and the Middle East for more than 25 years. He owned with other European partners three factories in Europe and was a consultant for many different companies in the fields of environment and process engineering. He applied for 6 patents in Europe between 1989 and 1994. He was the CEO of Mid Europe and Bude group in the Netherlands from 1992 till 1996 and served the group to a very high success in developing a simulation process for industrial production especially in the field of petrochemical industry.

In 2002 Dr. Badreddine applied in UK, PCT countries and USA for a patent developed by him under the name of Hans BioShaft. He was granted the patent in the UK.

In 2002 Dr. Badreddine entered into a partnership agreement with Shell services in UK to market and sell the patented technology of Hans BioShaft (the patent registered under his name). In 2004 the Kuwait government through the ministry of public work signed a contract to build a plant of STP by the technology of Hans BioShaft and assigned Dr. Badreddine as the designer and consultant for the plant in Kuwait city. The success of this project drew the attention of one of the largest industrial supply company in Kuwait, FPS international, and it asked Dr. Badreddine to join in forming a new company for the marketing and manufacture of the Hans BioShaft system in the Middle East. Dr. Badreddine has acted as CEO of this company since 2005.

In 2006 KBR of Texas, USA signed with Dr. Badreddine a memorandum of understanding to market, design, execute and manage projects under the Hans BioShaft technology in the Middle East and other countries. Dubai and Croatia are the active markets of cooperation between KBR and Dr. Badreddine up to this date.

In 2007 Dr. Badreddine decided to join our company by selling his patent for the Hans BioShaft System and to serve the American market by introducing his new technology.

Imad Kamel Yassine - Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

Imad Kamel Yassine was appointed as Chief Operating Officer on September 18, 2007, as a director of our company on August 14, 2007 and as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of our company on September 10, 2008.

Mr. Yassine received a B.S.C. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Alexandria University and is a member of the International Desalination Association. He has been involved in the water and waste water treatment industry for over thirty five years, with extensive experience in waste water recycling and desalination technologies. He has extensive experience in management, finance, international trade, manufacturing relating to the waste water treatment industry in addition to extensive knowledge of the U.S. and the international market.

44

---

In 2003 Mr. Yassine established Enviromatch Inc. and served as its CEO. Enviromatch is a water and waste water treatment consulting company. In 2005 he served as a director of Bauer International Corporation, which designs and manufactures water and waste water treatment systems. In 2005 he worked with Hussey, Gay, Bell & Deyoung Inc. Consulting Engineers. He provided business development and marketing services to identify and qualify potential clients for Hussey, Gay, Bell & Deyoung for water & waste water treatment and desalination. In 2007 he co-founded and served as a director for Enviromatch Co. Ltd. Enviromatch Co. Ltd. is a company specializing in the design and supply of standard and custom water and waste water treatment equipment and solutions. Enviromatch Co. Ltd combines the experience and reputation of American technology and the low cost of Chinese manufacturing and sales knowledge of the Asian market.

Bashar Amin – Vice President of Operations

Bashar Amin has been our vice president of operations since June 2, 2008.

Mr. Amin has more than 15 years of local and international experience in the water and wastewater treatment industry. Mr. Amin has received his Water Resources Control Board Engineer Classification for the State of California and has satisfied the academic qualifications for the Professional Engineers of Ontario, Canada.

Mr. Amin has completed more than 100 projects throughout his career. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Amin was the Operations Manager for Aquamatch Inc. and was responsible for the installation and operation of private and municipal water and wastewater treatment systems.

Mr. Amin completed his Masters of Science in Environmental Engineering at the California State University in Fresno.

From 2003 to June 2008 Mr. Amin was engaged as a private consultant in wastewater treatment engineering in Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors, executive officers and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1.           any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.           any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

3.           being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.           being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

45

---

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during the year ended April 30, 2010, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with, with the exception of the following:

(1)	The named officer, director or greater than 10% stockholder, as applicable, filed a late Form 3 – Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent" as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that apples to, among other persons, our company’s principal executive officers and senior financial executives, as well as persons performing similar functions. As adopted, our Code of Ethics sets forth written to promote:

• honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

• full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in all reports and documents that the Corporation files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and in other public communications made by the Corporation that are within the Senior Officer’s area of responsibility;

• compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

• the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code; and

46

---

• accountability for adherence to the Code.

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 14.1 to our annual report on Form 10-KSB/A on August 14, 2008. We will provide a copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: Bioshaft Water Technology, Inc., 1 Orchard Drive, Suite 220, Lake Forest, CA 92630.

Item 11.           Executive Compensation

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

• our principal executive officer;

• each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009; and

• up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended April 30, 2010 and 2009,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

Stock Options/SAR Grants

During the period from inception (March 8, 2006) to April 30, 2010, we did not grant any stock options to our executive officers.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Values

There were no options exercised during our fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 or April 30, 2009 by any officer or director of our company.

47

---

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

No equity awards were outstanding as of the year ended April 30, 2010.

Compensation of Directors

We reimburse our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings. We have not paid any director’s fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director since our inception to April 30, 2010.

We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase common shares as awarded by our board of directors or (as to future stock options) a compensation committee which may be established. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director. No director received and/or accrued any compensation for their services as a director, including committee participation and/or special assignments.

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

We have not entered into any employment agreement or consulting agreement with our directors and executive officers.

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. Our directors and executive officers may receive stock options at the discretion of our board of directors in the future. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors.

We have no plans or arrangements with respect to remuneration received or that may be received by our executive officers to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities following a change of control, where the value of such compensation exceeds $60,000 per executive officer.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of August 3, 2010, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

48

---

(1)

Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on August 13, 2010. As of August 13, 2010, there were 93,500,000 shares of our company’s common stock issued and outstanding.

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement or provisions of our Articles or Bylaws the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company. There are not any provisions in our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which would delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of our company.

Item 13.           Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as disclosed herein, there have been no transactions or proposed transactions in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last three completed fiscal years in which any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates, has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest.

The promoters of our company are our directors and officers.

Director Independence

We currently act with two directors, consisting of Hassan Hans Badreddine and Imad Kamel Yassine. We have determined that none of our directors are “independent directors” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors act in such capacity. We believe that our directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Our directors do not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining additional independent directors who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Item 14.           Principal Accountants Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and for fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

49

---

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

PART IV

Item 15.           Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

Exhibit
Number	Description
(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on June 13, 2006)
3.2	By-laws (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on June 13, 2006)
3.3	Certificate of Amendment (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2007)
3.4	Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on September 24, 2007 and which is effective September 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on September 28, 2007)
(10)	Material Contracts
10.1	Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2007).
10.2	Affiliate Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 20, 2007 between Imad Yassine, Altaf Alimohamed and Rafeh Hulays (incorporated by reference from Schedule 13D filed on August 24, 2007)
10.3	Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 18, 2007 between Hans Bio Shaft Limited, Hassan Hans Badreddine and our company (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2007)

50

---

Exhibit
Number	Description
10.4	Patent Assignment Agreement dated September 18, 2007 between Hans Bio Shaft Limited and our company (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2007)
10.5	Stock Option Plan of our company dated December 15, 2007 (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on March 17, 2008)
10.6	Consulting Agreement dated January 21, 2008 between our company and Tom Houston (incorporated from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 14, 2008)
10.7	Teaming Agreement dated January 31, 2008 between our company and Rapid Impact Compaction Contracting LLC (incorporated from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 14, 2008)
10.8	License Agreement dated February 14, 2008 between our company and FPS International (incorporated from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 14, 2008)
10.9	Draft Project Construction Contract between our company and FPS International (incorporated from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 14, 2008)
10.10	Loan Agreement made as of August 11, 2008 between our company and Premier Financial and Marketing Co. Ltd. (incorporated from our Quarterly Report filed on September 12, 2008)
10.11	General Security Agreement made as of August 11, 2008 between our company and Premier Financial and Marketing Co. Ltd. (incorporated from our Quarterly Report filed on September 12, 2008)
(14)	Code of Ethics
14.1	Code of Ethics and Business Conduct dates effective July 1, 2008 (incorporated from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 14, 2008)
(31)	Section 302 Certification
31.1*	Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Hassan Hans Badreddine
31.2*	Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Imad Kamel Yassine
(32)	Section 906 Certification
32.1*	Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Hassan Hans Badreddine
32.2*	Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Imad Kamel Yassine

*Filed herewith.

51

---

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BIOSHAFT WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	/s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine
	Hassan Hans Badreddine
	Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	Date: August 13, 2010
	/s/ Imad Kamel Yassine
	Imad Kamel Yassine
	Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
	Treasurer and Director
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
	Date: August 13, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
	Chief Executive Officer, President, and	August 13, 2010
/s/ Hassan Hans Badreddine	Director
Hassan Hans Badreddine
	Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial	August 13, 2010
	Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
/s/ Imad Kamel Yassine	Director
Imad Kamel Yassine

52

---