Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INCc04675exv32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INCc04675exv31w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INCc04675exv31w1.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 3, 2010
Commission file number 0-6072
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Georgia   58-1035424
     
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
  (IRS Employer ID Number)
     
660 Engineering Drive, Norcross, Georgia   30092
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (770) 263-9200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the close of business on August 9, 2010:
     
Class   Number of Shares
Common Stock, $0.10 par value   15,299,423
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
    2  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    16  
 
       
    31  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    36  
 
       
    37  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32

 

 


Table of Contents

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.   Financial Statements
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Product net sales
  $ 73,350       75,906       140,909       144,698  
Service net sales
    15,127       21,032       30,470       44,518  
 
                       
Net sales
    88,477       96,938       171,379       189,216  
 
                       
Product cost of sales
    49,040       50,456       95,473       97,094  
Service cost of sales
    7,080       14,229       13,929       31,576  
 
                       
Cost of sales
    56,120       64,685       109,402       128,670  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    22,128       23,038       43,801       44,972  
Research and development expenses
    4,709       4,233       10,130       8,639  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                384        
Acquisition-related items
    346       1,627       563       5,522  
 
                       
Operating income
    5,174       3,355       7,099       1,413  
Interest income
    101       103       281       165  
Interest expense
    (542 )     (667 )     (1,019 )     (1,288 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net
    244       235       (449 )     (232 )
 
                       
Earnings before income taxes
    4,977       3,026       5,912       58  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (1,109 )     160       (1,453 )     160  
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 3,868       3,186       4,459       218  
 
                       
 
                               
Net earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.25       0.21       0.29       0.01  
Diluted
    0.25       0.21       0.29       0.01  
 
                               
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    15,191       15,159       15,185       15,152  
Diluted
    15,230       15,225       15,218       15,244  
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    July 3     December 31  
    2010     2009  
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 44,805       47,174  
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful account of $1,166 in 2010 and $1,208 in 2009
    75,706       60,959  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    19,054       25,290  
Inventories
    46,327       40,655  
Deferred income taxes
    4,198       4,306  
Other current assets
    15,056       19,117  
 
           
Total current assets
    205,146       197,501  
 
           
Property, plant and equipment:
               
Land
    1,150       1,150  
Buildings and leasehold improvements
    18,749       18,792  
Machinery and equipment
    110,721       107,712  
Furniture and fixtures
    10,513       10,542  
 
           
Total property, plant and equipment
    141,133       138,196  
Less accumulated depreciation
    94,399       90,256  
 
           
Net property, plant and equipment
    46,734       47,940  
Deferred income taxes
    9,411       9,421  
Goodwill
    60,343       60,336  
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $22,639 in 2010 and $18,817 in 2009
    44,858       49,256  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    14,449       7,771  
Other assets
    1,666       1,920  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 382,607       374,145  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited), continued
(in thousands, except share data)
                 
    July 3     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Current installments of long-term debt
  $ 1,450       1,398  
Accounts payable
    32,170       27,333  
Billings in excess of contract costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts
    12,276       9,380  
Accrued compensation and related costs
    14,122       13,946  
Deferred revenue
    10,852       9,805  
Contingent consideration arrangement liability
    6,833       13,729  
Other current liabilities
    15,446       23,763  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    93,149       99,354  
 
               
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
    37,613       26,352  
Deferred income taxes
    5,521       5,757  
Other liabilities
    7,172       5,591  
 
           
Total liabilities
    143,455       137,054  
 
           
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock of $1.00 par value per share; Authorized 10,000 shares; none issued
           
Common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized 75,000 shares, issued and outstanding 15,300 in 2010 and 15,249 in 2009
    1,530       1,525  
Additional paid-in capital
    136,954       136,112  
Accumulated other comprehensive income — foreign currency translation adjustment
    2,821       6,066  
Retained earnings
    97,847       93,388  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    239,152       237,091  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 382,607       374,145  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net earnings
  $ 4,459       218  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    9,819       10,160  
Deferred income taxes
    (119 )      
Stock-based compensation expense
    885       1,070  
Change in fair value of contingent cosideration liability
    304       1,767  
Payment for acquisition of business under contingent consideration arrangement
    (1,248 )        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
               
Trade accounts receivable
    (16,503 )     3,331  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    (545 )     4,607  
Billings in excess of contract costs
    2,890       536  
Inventories
    (6,112 )     3,211  
Accounts payable
    4,105       (2,140 )
Deferred revenue
    3,432       899  
Other
    4,816       (1,607 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities in continuing operations
    6,183       22,052  
Net cash used in operating activities in discontinued operations
    (8,810 )      
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    (2,627 )     22,052  
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (3,820 )     (8,064 )
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
          (87,264 )
Proceeds from sales of assets
    24       36  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (3,796 )     (95,292 )
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility
    12,000       28,501  
Repayment of other debt
    (687 )     (635 )
Deferred financing costs paid
    (28 )     (251 )
Payment for acquisition of business under contingent consideration arrangement
    (5,952 )      
Payments for repurchase and retirement of common shares
    (51 )     (110 )
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
    13       238  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    5,295       27,743  
 
           
 
               
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    (1,241 )     595  
 
           
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    (2,369 )     (44,902 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    47,174       86,979  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 44,805       42,077  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009
1. Basis of Presentation
EMS Technologies, Inc. (“EMS”) is a leading provider of wireless connectivity solutions over satellite and terrestrial networks. EMS keeps people and systems connected, wherever they are — on land, at sea, in the air or in space. Serving the aeronautical, asset-tracking, defense, and mobile computing industries, EMS products and services enable universal mobility, visibility and intelligence.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EMS Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of EMS (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. There are no other entities controlled by the Company, either directly or indirectly. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2009 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2010 presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and are based on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Regulation S-X and its instructions to Form 10-Q. They do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. We have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Management’s Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and reporting of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual future results could differ materially from those estimates.
Recently Issued Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance amending and clarifying requirements for fair value measurements and disclosures in the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. The new guidance requires disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 and a reconciliation of all activity in Level 3. The guidance also requires detailed disaggregation disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities in all levels, and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques for Level 2 and Level 3. The guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2010 and the disclosure reconciliation of all activity in Level 3 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009 the FASB issued two accounting standards updates that could result in revenue being recognized earlier in certain revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Both updates are effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If the Company adopts this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, the Company will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to the beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. The Company is evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, amends the accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Among other things, ASU 2009-13:
    Eliminates the requirement for objective evidence of fair value of an undelivered item for treatment of the delivered item as a separate unit of accounting;
    Requires use of the relative selling price method for allocating total consideration to elements of the arrangement instead of the relative-fair-value method or the residual method;
    Allows the use of an estimated selling price for any element within the arrangement to allocate consideration to individual elements when vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of selling price do not exist; and
    Expands the required disclosures.
ASU 2009-14, Software — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, amends the guidance for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software elements. ASU 2009-14 redefines the scope of arrangements that fall within software revenue recognition guidance by specifically excluding tangible products that contain software components that function together to deliver the essential functionality of the tangible product.
Under current guidance, products that contain software that is more than incidental to the product as a whole fall within the scope of software revenue recognition guidance, which requires, among other things, the existence of vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of all undelivered items to allow a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting. Such tangible products excluded from the requirements of software revenue recognition requirements under ASU 2009-14 would follow the revenue recognition requirements for other revenue arrangements, including the new requirements for multiple-deliverable arrangements contained in ASU 2009-13.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development arrangements in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances. This update is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If the Company adopts this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, the Company will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. The Company is evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Business Combinations
During the six months ended July 4, 2009, the Company completed the acquisitions of two businesses that expanded its technology base. The Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interest in Formation, Inc. (“Formation”), of Moorestown, New Jersey, and Satamatics Global Limited (“Satamatics”), of Tewkesbury, UK, on January 9, 2009 and February 13, 2009, respectively.
The Company was required to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141(R), Business Combinations, which is included in FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, effective January 1, 2009, and these acquisitions were reflected in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with these revised standards.
The aggregate cash purchase price for these two entities was approximately $90.7 million. Of this amount, $88.8 million was paid in the first quarter of 2009, and the remaining $1.9 million was paid in the second quarter of 2009 upon resolution of working capital and cash provisions in the purchase agreements. In addition, one of the purchase agreements included a contingent consideration arrangement of up to $15 million. The final payment amount under the contingent consideration arrangement has been determined and a total of $14.0 million is due to the sellers, payable in cash in 2010, of which $7.2 million was paid in the second quarter of 2010. The remaining $6.8 million is due December 31, 2010. Of the $7.2 million paid in the second quarter of 2010, $6.0 million is reflected in the financing activities section of the consolidated statement of cash flows since that amount was included in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability as of the acquisition date. The remaining $1.2 million, which is reflected as an acquisition-related charge in the consolidated statement of operations since the acquisition date, is reflected as an operating activity in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

7


Table of Contents

For the acquired companies, the results for the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 included net sales of $11.8 million and $26.1 million, respectively, and a loss before income taxes of $0.4 million for both periods. The results for the three and six months ended July 4, 2009 included net sales of $16.7 million and $31.6 million, and earnings before taxes of $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The Company recognized charges of $0.3 million and $0.6 million related to the acquisitions in the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 and $1.6 million and $5.5 million for the three and six months ended July 4, 2009, respectively, which are included in acquisition-related items in the consolidated statements of operations. The acquisition-related charges included in the first six months of 2010 were primarily for professional fees related to acquired research and development tax credits and an adjustment in the earn-out liability for changes in payments to be made under the contingent consideration arrangement. The acquisition-related charges recorded in the first six months of 2009 included acquisition-related expenses as a result of the adoption of SFAS 141(R), and accretion of the contingent consideration liability. The first six months of 2009 also included a $1.4 million foreign exchange loss related to the funding of the Satamatics acquisition, which was required to be paid in British pounds sterling. The loss resulted from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the date the Company funded the transaction to the date the acquisition was completed.
3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable operating segment during the six months ended July 3, 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
            Global              
    Aviation     Tracking     LXE     Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2009
  $ 35,108       23,429       1,799       60,336  
 
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                7       7  
 
                       
 
                               
Balance as of July 3, 2010
  $ 35,108       23,429       1,806       60,343  
 
                       
The Company had $18.9 million of accumulated impairment losses recorded on LXE’s goodwill as of July 3, 2010.
The following table presents the gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization, in total and by major intangible asset class, for the Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                         
    As of July 3, 2010  
    Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
 
                       
Developed technology
  $ 39,973       15,769       24,204  
Customer relationships
    18,944       3,556       15,388  
Trade names and trademarks
    6,152       1,432       4,720  
Other
    2,428       1,882       546  
 
                 
 
                       
 
  $ 67,497       22,639       44,858  
 
                 

 

8


Table of Contents

                         
    As of December 31, 2009  
    Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
 
Developed technology
  $ 40,385       13,460       26,925  
Customer relationships
    19,052       2,493       16,559  
Trade names and trademarks
    6,208       1,052       5,156  
Other
    2,428       1,812       616  
 
                 
 
                       
 
  $ 68,073       18,817       49,256  
 
                 
Amortization expense related to these intangible assets for the three months and six months ended July 3, 2010 was $2.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively, and for the three months and six months ended July 4, 2009 was $2.9 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Expected amortization expense for the remainder of 2010 and for each of the five succeeding years is as follows: 2010 - $4.1 million, 2011 — $7.5 million, 2012 — $7.8 million, 2013 — $7.1 million, 2014 — $3.8 million and 2015 — $3.6 million.
As of July 3, 2010, we had approximately $60.3 million of goodwill and $44.9 million of other intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet, collectively representing approximately 28% of our total assets. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year. We are also required to test goodwill and other long-lived assets on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate that an asset might be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include a sustained, significant decline in our share price and market capitalization, a decline in expected future cash flows for one or more of our business units (including our recently acquired businesses), a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition and/or slower-than-expected growth rates, among others. If we are required to recognize an impairment loss related to goodwill or long-lived assets, the related charge, although a noncash charge, could materially reduce reported earnings or result in a loss for the period in which the impairment loss is recognized.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures financial and non-financial assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This guidance states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, this guidance establishes a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
    Level 1 — Observable inputs consisting of quoted prices in active markets;
    Level 2 — Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
    Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

 

9


Table of Contents

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily in the form of foreign currency forward contracts, in order to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on future fair values of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. The fair values of foreign currency contracts of $558,000 net liability at July 3, 2010 and $39,000 net asset at December 31, 2009 are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments using the income approach (a level 2 input per the provisions of ASC Topic 820) and are recorded in other current liabilities and other current assets, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses related to these forward contracts are included in foreign exchange gain (loss), net, in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company has two fixed-rate mortgages and has borrowings under its revolving credit facility. One mortgage has an 8.0% interest rate and a carrying amount as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $6.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The other mortgage has a 7.1% interest rate and a carrying amount as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $2.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The Company’s outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility were $30.5 million and $18.5 million as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company’s total debt was $37.9 million at July 3, 2010 and is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments (a level 2 input).
Management believes that these assets and liabilities can be liquidated without restriction.
5. Interim Segment Disclosures
The Company is organized into four reportable operating segments: Aviation, Defense & Space, LXE and Global Tracking. The Company determines operating segments in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on products and services that share distinct operating characteristics. Each segment is separately managed and is evaluated primarily upon operating income and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).
The Aviation segment designs and develops satellite-based communications solutions through a broad array of terminals and antennas for the aeronautical market that enable end-users in aircraft and other mobile platforms to communicate over Inmarsat and Iridium satellites and air-to-ground links. This segment also designs and builds aircraft cabin equipment to process data on board aircraft, including rugged data storage, cabin-wireless connectivity, and air-to-ground connectivity.
The LXE segment manufactures mobile terminals and wireless data collection equipment for logistics management systems. The manufacturing cycle for each order is generally just a few days. Products are marketed directly to end-users, through distributors, and integrators (such as value-added resellers who provide inventory management software) that incorporate it with their products and services for sale and delivery to end users. LXE operates mainly in three markets: the Americas market, which is comprised of North, South and Central America; the International market, which is comprised of all other geographic areas with the highest concentration in Europe; and direct sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”).
The Defense & Space segment manufactures custom-designed, highly engineered subsystems for use in space, airborne, and terrestrial applications for communications, radar, surveillance, precision tracking and electronic countermeasures. Orders typically involve development and production schedules that can extend a year or more. Products are typically sold to prime contractors or systems integrators rather than to end-users.
The Global Tracking segment provides satellite-based machine-to-machine mobile communications equipment and services to track, monitor and control remote assets, regardless of whether they are fixed, semi-fixed or mobile.
Additionally, Global Tracking provides equipment for the Cospas-Sarsat search-and-rescue system and incident-management software for rescue coordination worldwide.
Prior to 2010, the Company operated under three reportable operating segments: Communications & Tracking, D&S and LXE. The Aviation and Global Tracking segments were previously included in our Communications and Tracking segment. The Company’s historical financial data has been recast in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to conform to its 2010 segment presentation.

 

10


Table of Contents

Following is a summary of the Company’s interim segment data (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net sales:
                               
Aviation
  $ 25,338       33,408     $ 51,524       67,920  
LXE
    36,365       29,807       66,938       53,751  
Defense & Space
    16,758       25,189       33,292       52,097  
Global Tracking
    10,526       8,534       20,386       15,448  
Less intercompany sales
    (510 )           (761 )        
 
                       
Global Tracking external sales
    10,016       8,534       19,625       15,448  
 
                       
Total
  $ 88,477       96,938     $ 171,379       189,216  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income (loss):
                               
Aviation
  $ 1,816       3,799     $ 2,125       8,865  
LXE
    2,077       214       2,969       (4,847 )
Defense & Space
    1,694       2,301       2,612       5,193  
Global Tracking
    684       (4 )     838       (763 )
Corporate & Other
    (1,097 )     (2,955 )     (1,445 )     (7,035 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 5,174       3,355     $ 7,099       1,413  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings (loss) before income taxes:
                               
Aviation
  $ 1,877       3,999     $ 1,805       9,555  
LXE
    2,050       (22 )     2,833       (5,160 )
Defense & Space
    1,694       2,301       2,616       5,193  
Global Tracking
    888       239       934       (168 )
Corporate & Other
    (1,532 )     (3,491 )     (2,276 )     (9,362 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 4,977       3,026     $ 5,912       58  
 
                       
The results before income taxes for Corporate & Other for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 includes $1.6 million and $5.5 million of acquisition-related charges, respectively. The first six months of 2009 also includes a $1.4 million foreign exchange loss related to the funding of the Satamatics acquisition and other expenses that are not allocated to operating segments in the financial data reviewed by the chief operating decision maker.
                 
    July 3     December 31  
    2010     2009  
Assets:
               
Aviation
  $ 143,780       144,483  
LXE
    83,227       71,632  
Defense & Space
    53,919       53,883  
Global Tracking
    78,573       75,922  
Corporate & Other
    23,108       28,225  
 
           
Total
  $ 382,607       374,145  
 
           
 
               
Concentration of net assets by geographic region:
               
United States
  $ 68,270       72,826  
Canada
    66,119       62,239  
Europe
    100,350       97,216  
Other
    4,413       4,810  
 
           
Total
  $ 239,152       237,091  
 
           

 

11


Table of Contents

Sales to no individual customer exceeded 10% of our net sales during the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, or July 4, 2009.
6. Earnings Per Share
Following is a reconciliation of the denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    15,191       15,159       15,185       15,152  
Dilutive potential shares using the treasury share method
    39       66       33       92  
 
                       
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    15,230       15,225       15,218       15,244  
 
                       
 
                               
Shares that were not included in computation of diluted earnings per share that could potentially dilute future basic earnings per share because their effect on the periods were antidilutive
    1,008       653       1,045       835  
 
                       
7. Comprehensive Income (loss)
Following is a summary of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Net earnings
  $ 3,868       3,186       4,459       218  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    (5,056 )     4,076       (3,245 )     2,896  
 
                       
 
  $ (1,188 )     7,262       1,214       3,114  
 
                       
8. Inventories
Inventories as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009 include the following (in thousands):
                 
    July 3     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Parts and materials
  $ 29,243       25,221  
Work-in-process
    5,727       5,142  
Finished goods
    11,357       10,292  
 
           
 
  $ 46,327       40,655  
 
           
Costs included in inventories related to long-term programs or contracts are primarily for materials and work performed on programs awaiting funding, or on contracts not yet finalized. Such costs were $2.2 million at July 3, 2010, and $1.1 million at December 31, 2009.

 

12


Table of Contents

9. Revolving Credit Facility
During the first six months of 2009, the Company completed two acquisitions and used borrowings under its revolving credit facility to fund a portion of the transactions. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company’s net borrowings increased by $11.5 million mainly to fund cash payments for award costs related to claims made by the purchasers of the Company’s former EMS Wireless division of $8.6 million (see Note 13 for additional information) and $7.2 million for earn-out amounts related to acquisitions completed in 2009. As of July 3, 2010, the Company had $30.5 million of borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
The Company has $2.1 million of standby letters of credit to satisfy performance guarantee requirements under certain customer contracts. While these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date should the Company fail to meet certain contractual requirements. After deducting outstanding letters of credit, at July 3, 2010 the Company had $29.5 million available for borrowing in the U.S. and $12.9 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit agreement.
10. Warranty Liability
The Company provides a limited warranty for a variety of its products. The specific terms and conditions of the warranties vary depending upon the specific products and markets. The Company records a liability at the time of sale for the estimated costs to be incurred under warranties, which is included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of this liability is based upon historical, as well as expected, experience.
The warranty liability is periodically reviewed for adequacy and adjusted as necessary. Following is a summary of the activity for the periods presented related to the Company’s liability for limited warranties (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of the period
  $ 4,510       3,380       4,085       2,789  
Additions at dates of acquisition for businesses acquired during period
                      516  
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
    849       1,285       2,056       2,284  
Settlements made during the period
    (835 )     (869 )     (1,617 )     (1,793 )
 
                       
Balance at end of period
  $ 4,524       3,796       4,524       3,796  
 
                       
11. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has granted nonvested restricted stock and nonqualified stock options to key employees and directors under several stock award plans. The Company granted stock awards with an aggregate fair value of approximately $2.4 million during the first six months of 2010 and the first six months of 2009. The Company recognized expense in the second quarter and first six months of $0.5 million and $0.9 million in 2010, and $0.6 million and $1.1 million in 2009, respectively, before income tax benefits, for all the Company’s stock plans.
12. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, the rate was impacted by tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions that have not been recognized. In addition, the effective rate in 2010 is higher than 2009 since the earnings in Canada in 2010 are expected to be subject to higher rates due to provincial taxes and the rate used for U.S. taxable income is higher since certain key provisions of the U.S. tax law, including the research and development credit, have not been extended to be in effect for tax year 2010.

 

13


Table of Contents

The Company is under audit in Canada at the federal level for the years 2006 and 2007. The Company expects the audits to be completed in the next twelve months. Any related unrecognized tax benefits could be adjusted based on the results of the audits. The Company cannot estimate the range of the change that is reasonably possible at this time.
13. Discontinued Operations
Prior to 2009, the Company disposed of its S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless divisions. The sales agreements for each of these disposals contained standard indemnification provisions for various contingencies that could not be resolved before the dates of closing and for various representations and warranties provided by the Company and the purchasers. The purchaser of EMS Wireless asserted claims under such representations and warranties. The parties agreed to arbitration, which commenced in the third quarter of 2009. In March of 2010, the Company received an interim decision from the arbitrator on these claims awarding the purchaser a total of approximately $9.2 million under the warranty provisions of the purchase agreement. As a result, the Company accrued a liability for the award costs, based on the interim decision, in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2009. On April 30, 2010, the arbitrator issued the final decision awarding the purchaser of the Company’s former EMS Wireless division $8.6 million. Based on this final award, the Company reduced its estimated liability by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2010. This favorable adjustment in discontinued operations in the three months ended April 3, 2010 was offset by additional charges related to estimated contingent liabilities associated with other divisions disposed of prior to 2009.
In conjunction with the sale of S&T/Montreal in 2005, an existing contractual requirement for the Company to post approximately $3 million to secure in-orbit incentive performance of the Radarsat-2 payload was eliminated, but the Company continues to warrant that amount in the event of specified in-orbit payload failures. Based upon the available information, management believes that the outcome for this particular contingency is not probable and cannot be estimated. As a result, the Company has not incurred any costs to date, and has not recorded a liability as of July 3, 2010, with respect to this contingency. The Company incurred no additional costs related to this disposition through the second quarter of 2010.
The Company has an agreement with the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to acquire a license for $8 million in payments over a seven-year period, beginning in December 2008, for the rights to a certain satellite territory. The Company and the purchaser have a corresponding sublicense agreement that granted the territory rights back to the purchaser, under which the Company is to receive a portion of the satellite service revenues from the specific market territory over the same period. The purchaser had previously guaranteed that the revenues derived under the sublicense would equal or exceed the acquisition cost of the license. As part of the agreement to sell the net assets of S&T/Montreal, the Company released the purchaser from this guarantee. Without the guarantee, the Company estimates that its portion of the satellite service revenues will be less than the acquisition cost, and the Company has accordingly reflected a liability for the net cost in its consolidated balance sheet. As of July 3, 2010, no payments have been made by the Company under this license agreement. The satellite service revenues from the specific market territory included under the sublicense agreement are considerably lower than expected. The Company believes that sufficient efforts are not being made by the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to market this satellite service. The parties are finalizing settlement under these agreements. The Company believes that the net liability recorded in its consolidated balance sheet is its best estimate of the settlement amount. If a settlement is reached, it is expected to be paid in the following twelve months, and therefore the net liability is recorded as a current liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of July 3, 2010.
14. Repurchases of Common Shares
On July 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $20 million of the Company’s common shares. As of July 3, 2010, the Company had repurchased 495,000 common shares for approximately $10.1 million. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s principal credit agreements. There were no repurchases of common shares under this program during the six months ended July 3, 2010.

 

14


Table of Contents

15. Litigation
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

15


Table of Contents

Item 2.   Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
We are a leading provider of wireless connectivity solutions over satellite and terrestrial networks. We keep people and systems connected, wherever they are — on land, at sea, in the air or in space. Serving the aeronautical, asset-tracking, defense, and mobile computing industries, our products and services enable universal mobility, visibility and intelligence. Our operations include the following four reportable operating segments:
    Aviation — Designs and develops satellite-based communications solutions through a broad array of terminals and antennas for the aeronautical market that enable end-users in aircraft and other mobile platforms to communicate over Inmarsat and Iridium satellites and air-to-ground links. This segment also designs and builds aircraft cabin equipment to process data on board aircraft, including rugged data storage, cabin-wireless connectivity, and air-to-ground connectivity;
    LXE — Provides rugged mobile terminals and wireless data networks used for logistics applications such as distribution centers, warehouses and container ports. LXE operates mainly in three markets: the Americas market, which is comprised of North, South and Central America; the International market, which is comprised of all other geographic areas, with the highest concentration in Europe; along with direct sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”);
    Defense & Space (“D&S”) — Supplies highly engineered subsystems for defense electronics and sophisticated satellite applications from military communications, radar, surveillance and countermeasures to commercial high-definition television, satellite radio, and live TV for innovative airlines; and
    Global Tracking — Provides satellite-based machine-to-machine mobile communications equipment and services to track, monitor and control remote assets, regardless of whether they are fixed, semi-fixed or mobile. Additionally, Global Tracking provides equipment for the Cospas-Sarsat search-and-rescue system and incident-management software for rescue coordination worldwide.
Following is a summary of significant factors affecting or related to our results of operations for the three months and six months ended July 3, 2010:
    Our earnings before income taxes were $5.0 million in the second quarter of 2010, an improvement of $4.0 million from the first quarter of 2010, with higher earnings reported by each of our four segments. Our earnings before income taxes improved by $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2010 from the second quarter of 2009, and by $5.9 million in the first six months of 2010 compared with the first six months of 2009. Both LXE and Global Tracking reported higher earnings than in the prior year and the combined acquisition-related charges and amortization expense were substantially lower in 2010. For the second quarter and first six months of 2010, acquisition-related charges were lower by $1.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively, and amortization expense was lower by $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, as compared with the same periods of 2009.
    LXE had its best quarterly sales quarter since 2008, with $36.4 million in revenues, up 19% from the first quarter and 22% higher than the second quarter a year ago. This revenue improvement was mainly due to a resurgent Americas market. International revenues also increased, but at a much lower rate, as revenue and gross margins were pressured by a weaker Euro.
    Net sales improved at Global Tracking mainly due to strong product sales in the security market and higher airtime revenues.

 

16


Table of Contents

    Defense & Space and Aviation each reported improved earnings in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter. Strong program execution drove the improvement at Defense & Space and strong demand for military SwiftBroadband provided the improvement at Aviation. However, each segment reported lower revenue and earnings compared to comparable periods in 2009. Defense & Space completed a large military satellite communications research project in 2009. Sales of aviation products in 2010 reflect the current state of commercial aviation markets — especially for business jets and for air-to-ground connectivity to airlines. Shipment of new military orders was a positive factor for Aviation as over one-third of Aviation’s orders in the second quarter of 2010 related to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance applications, underscoring EMS’s market strength in this strategic area.
    As certain of our markets continue to be impacted by the economy, they may face continuing pressures and risks. We expect that we will continue to be faced with these economic pressures at least through the end of 2010. These and other factors could cause a decline in expected future cash flows for one or more of our business units (including our recently acquired businesses), and as a result it is reasonably possible that we may be required to recognize an impairment loss related to goodwill or other long-lived assets in the future.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth items from the consolidated statements of operations as reported and as a percentage of net sales (or product net sales and service net sales for product cost of sales and service cost of sales, respectively) for each period (in thousands, except percentages):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                                                               
Product net sales
  $ 73,350       82.9 %   $ 75,906       78.3 %   $ 140,909       82.2 %   $ 144,698       76.5 %
Service net sales
    15,127       17.1       21,032       21.7       30,470       17.8       44,518       23.5  
 
                                               
Net sales
    88,477       100.0       96,938       100.0       171,379       100.0       189,216       100.0  
 
                                               
Product cost of sales
    49,040       66.9       50,456       66.5       95,473       67.8       97,094       67.1  
Service cost of sales
    7,080       46.8       14,229       67.7       13,929       45.7       31,576       70.9  
 
                                                       
Cost of sales
    56,120       63.4       64,685       66.7       109,402       63.9       128,670       68.0  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    22,128       25.1       23,038       23.7       43,801       25.6       44,972       23.8  
Research and development expenses
    4,709       5.3       4,233       4.4       10,130       5.9       8,639       4.6  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                            384       0.2              
Acquisition-related items
    346       0.4       1,627       1.7       563       0.3       5,522       2.9  
 
                                               
Operating income
    5,174       5.8       3,355       3.5       7,099       4.1       1,413       0.7  
Interest income
    101       0.1       103       0.1       281       0.2       165       0.1  
Interest expense
    (542 )     (0.6 )     (667 )     (0.7 )     (1,019 )     (0.6 )     (1,288 )     (0.7 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net
    244       0.3       235       0.2       (449 )     (0.3 )     (232 )     (0.1 )
 
                                               
Earnings before income taxes
    4,977       5.6       3,026       3.1       5,912       3.4       58        
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (1,109 )     (1.2 )     160       0.2       (1,453 )     (0.8 )     160       0.1  
 
                                               
Net earnings
  $ 3,868       4.4 %   $ 3,186       3.3 %   $ 4,459       2.6 %   $ 218       0.1 %
 
                                               
Three Months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009:
Net sales of $88.5 million in the second quarter of 2010 were 8.7% lower than the $96.9 million in the second quarter of 2009. Lower net sales from our D&S and Aviation segments were partially offset by higher net sales from our LXE and Global Tracking segments. Net sales were lower at D&S mainly due to the conclusion of work performed on a significant military communications research project in the fourth quarter of 2009, and therefore not included in the 2010 results. Net sales were lower at Aviation primarily due to a lower volume of connectivity products and of Inmarsat high-speed data and antenna product shipments reflecting a slow-down in the air-transport, military and business jet markets, and lower shipments of Aviation’s other products as a customer nears completion of a significant project in the second quarter of 2010. LXE’s net sales in the second quarter of 2010 were $6.6 million higher than in the same period in 2009, an increase of 22%, with higher net sales in the Americas market and to a lesser extent in the International and new OEM markets. The increase in net sales at Global Tracking was primarily a result of the timing of revenue recognized on two long-term emergency management programs and an increase in airtime revenue as a result of a higher number of terminals in use from our asset-tracking product lines.

 

17


Table of Contents

Product net sales of $73.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 were 3.4% lower than product net sales in the second quarter of 2009. This was primarily due to a lower volume of shipments of our connectivity and Inmarsat high-speed data and antenna products at Aviation, and lower product net sales at D&S, partially offset by an increase in product net sales from a higher number of terminals shipped by LXE, and additional net sales generated from our asset-tracking products at Global Tracking. Service net sales of $15.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 were 28.1% lower than service net sales in the same period in 2009, mainly due to the conclusion of significant work performed on a military communications research project by D&S partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue at Global Tracking generated from our asset-tracking product line acquired during the first quarter of 2009. As a result, product net sales comprised a higher percentage of total net sales in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the second quarter of 2009.
Overall cost of sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales was lower in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 due to lower cost-of-sales percentages reported by three of our four reportable operating segments and a higher percentage of net sales generated from our LXE and Global Tracking segments, which have lower cost-of-sales percentages than our other two segments. Service cost of sales as a percentage of respective net sales was lower and product cost of sales as a percentage of respective net sales was relatively unchanged in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. The decrease in the service cost-of-sales percentage was mainly due to a lower proportion of service revenues generated from our D&S segment, which has a higher service cost-of-sales percentage than our other three reportable operating segments.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of consolidated net sales was higher for the second quarter of 2010 compared with the second quarter in 2009. Actual expenses were $0.9 million lower in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly due to management’s cost reduction efforts, lower severances charges by approximately $0.4 million, and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our LXE international operations. These lower costs were partially offset by the additional marketing and selling costs related to the higher sales at LXE and Global Tracking, and the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on Aviation’s Canadian operations.
R&D expenses were $0.5 million higher in the second quarter of 2010 than in the comparable period in 2009 mainly due to additional R&D expenses at Aviation, D&S and LXE for the expansion of our technology base, and unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our Canadian operations.
Acquisition-related items included charges of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2010. These costs were primarily for professional fees related to acquired research and development tax credits and an adjustment in the earn-out liability for changes in payments to be made for one of the acquisitions completed in the first quarter of 2009. Acquisition-related charges were $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2009. These costs were primarily related to professional fees for legal, due-diligence, valuation, and integration services for the acquisition of our Formation and Satamatics businesses (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for additional information on these business acquisitions).
The second quarter of 2010 included a $0.2 million foreign exchange net gain related to the conversion of assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency and related to changes in the fair value of forward contracts used to hedge against currency exposure.
We recognized income tax expense of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 equal to 22% of earnings before income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the three months ended July 3, 2010, the rate was higher than it otherwise would have been since tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions have not been recognized. In addition, the effective rate in 2010 was higher than 2009 since the earnings in Canada in 2010 are expected to be subject to higher rates due to provincial taxes, and the rate used for U.S. taxable income is higher since certain key provisions of the U.S. tax law, including the research and development credit, have not been extended to be in effect for 2010 as of the end of the second quarter. If these provisions are extended, our effective tax rate will be lower for the remainder of 2010. However, we can make no assurances that these provisions will be extended to be in effect for 2010.

 

18


Table of Contents

Six Months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009:
Net sales of $171.4 million in the first six months of 2010 were 9.4% lower than the $189.2 million in the same period in 2009. Lower net sales from our D&S and Aviation segments were partially offset by higher net sales from our LXE and Global Tracking segments. Net sales were lower at D&S mainly due to the conclusion of work performed on a significant military communications research project in the fourth quarter of 2009, and therefore not included in the 2010 results. Net sales were lower at Aviation primarily due to a lower volume of connectivity products and of Inmarsat high-speed data and antenna product shipments reflecting a slow-down in the air-transport, military and business jet markets, and lower shipments of Aviation’s other products as a customer nears completion of a significant project in the second quarter of 2010. LXE’s net sales in the first six months of 2010 were $13.2 million higher than in the same period in 2009, an increase of 24.5%, mainly due to higher net sales in the Americas market. Net sales were also higher, but to a lesser extent, in the International market, and from a new source of revenue from sales made directly to OEMs. The increase in net sales at Global Tracking was primarily a result of additional net sales generated from our asset-tracking product line acquired in February 2009.
Product net sales of $140.9 million in the first six months of 2010 were 2.6% lower than product net sales in the first six months of 2009. This was primarily due to lower net sales from a lower volume of shipments of our connectivity and Inmarsat high-speed data and antenna products at Aviation, and lower product net sales at D&S partially offset by an increase in product net sales from a higher number of terminals shipped by LXE, and additional net sales generated from our asset-tracking products at Global Tracking. Service net sales of $30.5 million in the first six months of 2010 were 31.6% lower than service net sales in the same period in 2009, mainly due to the conclusion of significant work performed on a military communications research project by D&S partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue generated from our asset-tracking product line acquired during the first quarter of 2009. As a result, product net sales comprised a higher percentage of total net sales in the first six months of 2010 compared with the first six months of 2009.
Overall cost of sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales was lower in the first six months of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 due to lower cost-of-sales percentages reported by three of our four reportable operating segments and a higher percentage of net sales generated from our LXE and Global Tracking segments which have lower cost-of-sales percentages than our other two segments. Service cost of sales as a percentage of its respective net sales was lower and product cost of sales as a percentage of its respective net sales was relatively unchanged in the first six months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. The lower service cost-of-sales percentage was mainly due to a lower proportion of service revenues generated from our D&S segment, which has a higher service cost-of-sales percentage than our other three reportable operating segments.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of consolidated net sales increased for the first six months of 2010 compared with the first six months in 2009. Actual expenses were $1.2 million lower in the first six months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly due to management’s cost reduction efforts, lower severances charges by approximately $1.0 million, and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our LXE international operations. These lower costs were partially offset by the additional costs related to the acquired product lines, and the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on Aviation’s Canadian operations.
R&D expenses were $1.5 million higher in the first six months of 2010 than in the comparable period in 2009 mainly due to additional R&D spending by each of our segments for the expansion of our technology base, and unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our Canadian operations.
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges was $0.4 million in the first six months of 2010. The charges included in this category represent the costs of engaging outside professionals for valuation and audit services related to the goodwill impairment analysis conducted in the first six months of 2010.

 

19


Table of Contents

Acquisition-related items included charges of $0.6 million in the first six months of 2010. These costs were primarily for professional fees related to acquired research and development tax credits and an adjustment in the earn-out liability for changes in payments to be made for one of the acquisitions completed in the first quarter of 2009. Acquisition-related charges were $5.5 million in the first six months of 2009. These costs were primarily related to professional fees for legal, due-diligence, valuation, and integration services for the acquisition of our Formation and Satamatics businesses (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for additional information on these business acquisitions).
The first six months of 2010 included a $0.4 million foreign exchange net loss related to changes in the functional currency equivalent of assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency and related to changes in the fair value of forward contracts used to hedge against these currency exposures. The first six months of 2009 included a $1.4 million foreign exchange loss related to the funding of the Satamatics acquisition, which was required to be paid in British pounds sterling. The loss resulted from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the date we funded the transaction to the date the acquisition was completed. Partially offsetting this loss in the first six months of 2009 were net gains from changes in the functional currency equivalent of assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency and changes in the fair value of forward contracts.
We recognized income tax expense of $1.5 million in the first six months of 2010 equal to 25% of earnings before income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the six months ended July 3, 2010, the rate was higher than it otherwise would have been since tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions have not been recognized. In addition, the effective rate in 2010 was higher than 2009 since the earnings in Canada in 2010 are expected to be subject to higher rates due to provincial taxes and the rate used for U.S. taxable income is higher since certain key provisions of the U.S. tax law, including the research and development credit, have not been extended to be in effect for 2010 as of the end of the second quarter.

 

20


Table of Contents

Segment Analysis
Our segment net sales, cost of sales as a percentage of respective segment net sales, segment operating income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
                                                 
                                    Percentage  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     Increase (Decrease)  
    July 3     July 4     July 3     July 4     Three     Six  
    2010     2009     2010     2009     Months     Months  
 
                                               
Net sales:
                                               
Aviation
  $ 25,338       33,408       51,524       67,920       (24.2) %     (24.1 )
LXE
    36,365       29,807       66,938       53,751       22.0       24.5  
Defense & Space
    16,758       25,189       33,292       52,097       (33.5 )     (36.1 )
Global Tracking
    10,526       8,534       20,386       15,448       23.3       32.0  
Less intercompany sales
    (510 )           (761 )             2      
 
                                       
Global Tracking external sales
    10,016       8,534       19,625       15,448       17.4       27.0  
 
                                       
Total
  $ 88,477       96,938       171,379       189,216       (8.7 )     (9.4 )
 
                                       
 
                                               
Cost of sales percentage:
                                               
Aviation
    62.7 %     62.3       65.0       61.8       0.4       3.2  
LXE
    59.7       61.1       59.1       63.8       (1.4 )     (4.7 )
Defense & Space
    74.5       80.6       76.0       79.4       (6.1 )     (3.4 )
Global Tracking
    51.1       61.7       51.8       68.1       (10.6 )     (16.3 )
Total
    63.4       66.7       63.9       68.0       (3.3 )     (4.1 )
 
                                               
Operating income (loss):
                                               
Aviation
  $ 1,816       3,799       2,125       8,865       (52.2 )     (76.0 )
LXE
    2,077       214       2,969       (4,847 )     870.6         2
Defense & Space
    1,694       2,301       2,612       5,193       (26.4 )     (49.7 )
Global Tracking
    684       (4 )     838       (763 )       2       2
Corporate & Other
    (1,097 )     (2,955 )     (1,445 )     (7,035 )       2       2
 
                                       
Total
  $ 5,174       3,355       7,099       1,413       54.2       402.4  
 
                                       
 
                                               
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
                                               
Aviation
  $ 3,713       6,199       5,872       13,830       (40.1 )     (57.5 )
LXE
    3,076       1,037       4,783       (2,988 )     196.6         2
Defense & Space
    2,616       3,218       4,447       6,981       (18.7 )     (36.3 )
Global Tracking
    1,808       1,598       2,762       1,738       13.1       58.9  
Corporate & Other
    (84 )     (606 )     718       (93 )       2       2
 
                                       
Total
  $ 11,129       11,446       18,582       19,468       (2.8 )     (4.6 )
 
                                       
     
(1)   Adjusted EBITDA is considered a non-generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measure. See section entitled “Adjusted EBITDA” for an explanation of this measure and a reconciliation to net earnings on page 25.
 
(2)   The percentage change is not calculable.
Aviation: Net sales decreased by $8.1 million and $16.4 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2009. The decrease in net sales was mainly due to a lower volume of shipments of Aviation’s connectivity and Inmarsat products in the second quarter and first six months of 2010. Shipments were lower for Aviation’s air-to-ground in-cabin connectivity products into the air transport market due to delays in customer orders resulting from changes in the airline’s rollout schedule of connectivity, and to a transition to a new buying pattern by our customer to acquire inventory as needed to meet scheduled installations instead of maintaining a stock of inventory of on-hand. Shipments were lower for Aviation’s other products as a customer nears completion of a significant project in the second quarter of 2010. Shipments were lower for Aviation’s other connectivity products due to the completion of a significant project in the second quarter of 2010. Shipments were lower for Aviation’s Inmarsat high-speed-data terminal and antenna products into the air transport, military and business jet markets reflecting a slow-down in those markets in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the same periods of 2009. However, shipments of Inmarsat products to the military market were higher in the second quarter of 2010, approximately double, as compared with the first quarter of 2010, indicating a strong demand for Aviation’s products in that market.

 

21


Table of Contents

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was higher for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009. The cost-of-sales percentage was higher mainly due to lower production volume over which fixed costs were absorbed, and an unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates that affected our reported international costs in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, partially offset by a more favorable mix of Inmarsat products sold and lower amortization costs of intangible assets than the same periods of 2009.
Operating income decreased by $2.0 million and $6.7 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the same periods in 2009, primarily as a result of lower net sales, and a higher cost-of-sales percentage in the second quarter and first six months of 2010. In addition, operating income was lower due to the unfavorable effects of foreign currency exchange rates in the first six months of 2010 and approximately $0.5 million of severance charges recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 7.2% and 11.4% in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 4.1% and 13.1% in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $2.5 million and $8.0 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the same periods in 2009, respectively, due to a decrease in operating income. Adjusted EBITDA also decreased in the first six months of 2010 as compared with the same period of 2009 due to an unfavorable change in foreign currency gains and losses.
LXE: Net sales in the second quarter of 2010 were higher than each of the preceding five quarters, and increased by $5.8 million as compared with the first quarter of 2010, and $6.6 million as compared with the same period in 2009. Net sales were also higher in the first six months of 2010 by $13.2 million as compared with the first six months of 2009. Net sales increased in the Americas market and to a lesser extent in the International market in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, as compared with the same periods in 2009. The increase in net sales in the Americas market resulted primarily from a higher volume of terminals shipped in that market in response to a higher demand for rugged handheld computer products. The increase in net sales in the International market was mainly due to a higher volume of terminals shipped in that market partially offset by the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the reported net sales from LXE’s International market. Sales generated from handheld computer products introduced in the fourth quarter of 2009 to the OEM market gained acceptance in certain service industries in 2010 and represents $1.9 million or 5.4% and $4.4 million or 6.6% of net sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the same periods in 2009 mainly due to management’s efforts to reduce costs, a higher production volume over which fixed costs were absorbed, and a $0.7 million reduction in cost of sales for purchased items previously included in accounts payable that were determined to no longer be liabilities. Additional purchased items included in liabilities are being reviewed and are expected to be resolved in future periods, which could result in further reductions to cost of sales. The effects of these reductions in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales were partially offset by an unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates that affected our reported International net sales in the first six months of 2010. Revenues are generally denominated in the local functional currency but product costs are denominated in the U.S. dollar, which was stronger in the first six months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009.
LXE generated operating income of $2.0 million and $3.0 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with operating income of $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2009, and an operating loss of $4.8 million in the first six months of 2009. This increase in operating income in 2010 was mainly a result of the margin delivered by the higher net sales. In addition, operating income increased as a result of a more favorable cost-of-sales percentage. These increases in operating income were partially offset by higher R&D expenses reflecting the development of three new products to be released later in 2010. SG&A expenses were $0.6 million higher in the second quarter of 2010, but were lower in the first six months of 2010 by $0.4 million as compared with the same periods of 2009. SG&A expenses were higher in the second quarter of 2010 mainly due to increased commissions and other selling expenses as a result of higher sales. Lower SG&A expenses for the first six months of 2010 were primarily a result of staff reductions to reduce LXE’s cost structure, the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on reported costs, and lower severance charges. Severance charges were lower by approximately by $1.3 million in the first six months of 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 5.7% and 0.7% in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 4.4% and negative 9.0% in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

22


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA increased by $2.0 million and $7.8 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009, mainly due to an increase in operating income in 2010.
Defense & Space: Net sales decreased by $8.4 million and $18.8 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the same period of 2009 mainly due to work performed on military programs that were included in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, including a large military satellite communications research project, but that were completed in 2009 and will not contribute to net sales in future quarters. Order backlog of long-term contracts was $84.8 million at July 3, 2010, a decrease of $4.8 million from December 31, 2009. Order backlog consists of a higher percentage of production contracts than development contracts as of July 3, 2010 as compared with the order backlog as of July 4, 2009.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower in the second quarter of 2010 than each of the preceding seven quarters, and was lower in the first six months of 2010 as compared with the first six months of 2009, mainly due to a favorable mix of contracts and production efficiencies gained on certain long-term defense-related projects in the second quarter and first six months of 2010. The cost-of-sales percentage for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 included approximately $0.5 million of severance changes which were not included in the first six months of 2010.
Operating income was lower by $0.6 million and $2.6 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009. The lower operating income was mainly due to the decrease in net sales generated in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, and higher R&D expenses, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses. The lower SG&A costs reflect the impact of management’s cost reduction efforts initiated in 2009. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 10.1% and 9.1% in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 7.8% and 10.0% in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $0.6 million and $2.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009, mainly due to a decrease in operating income in 2010.
Global Tracking: Net sales increased by $2.0 million and $4.9 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2009. The increase in net sales in the second quarter of 2010 was primarily a result of the completion of two long-term emergency management programs that triggered revenue recognition and an increase in airtime revenue as a result of a higher number of terminals in use from our asset-tracking product lines. The increase in net sales in the first six months of 2010 was mainly due to the net sales generated from our new asset-tracking product lines acquired on February 13, 2009, which contributed $2.9 million of additional net sales in the first six months of 2010, including higher airtime revenue, compared to the same period of 2009. Net sales included a higher concentration of product shipments to the security market in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009, reflecting growth in that market.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 as compared with the same periods in 2009. The cost-of-sales percentage for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 included a more favorable sales mix, reflecting a growth in airtime revenue which has a lower cost-of-sales percentage than product net sales, and lower amortization costs of intangible assets than the same periods of 2009 mainly due to certain acquired intangible assets that were fully amortized after the second quarter of 2009.

 

23


Table of Contents

Operating income increased by $0.7 million and $1.6 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2009, primarily as a result of higher net sales and a lower cost-of-sales percentage, partially offset by higher SG&A costs. For the second quarter of 2010, these higher SG&A costs were mainly due to additional staff and marketing efforts to support the growth in the asset tracking business, and an increase in selling expenses resulting from the growth in net sales. For the first six months of 2010, these higher costs were primarily a result of the timing of the acquisition of our new product lines in the first quarter of 2009; the costs related to the newly acquired product lines were included in the operating results of our Global Tracking segment for the first six months of 2009 from the date of acquisition, but were included in the full six months of 2010. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 6.5% and breakeven in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively and was 4.3% and a negative 4.9% in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $0.2 million and $1.0 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2009 mainly due to an increase in operating income in 2010. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the first six months of 2010 as compared with the same period of 2009 was partially offset by an unfavorable change in foreign currency gains year over year.

 

24


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA
In addition to traditional GAAP financial measures, we also measure our performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and before impairment loss on goodwill related charges, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related items and acquisition-related foreign exchange adjustments (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The following table is a reconciliation of net earnings (which is the most directly comparable GAAP operating performance measure) and earnings (loss) before income taxes by segment to Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 and July 4, 2009 (in thousands):
                                                 
    Aviation     LXE     D&S     GT     Corp &
Other
    Total  
Three Months Ended July 3, 2010
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 3,868  
Income tax expense
                                            1,109  
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
  $ 1,877       2,050       1,694       888       (1,532 )     4,977  
Interest expense
    4       1             1       536       542  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,752       951       865       899       312       4,779  
Stock-based compensation
    80       74       57       20       254       485  
Acquisition-related items
                            346       346  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 3,713       3,076       2,616       1,808       (84 )   $ 11,129  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Six Months Ended July 3, 2010
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 4,459  
Income tax expense
                                            1,453  
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
  $ 1,805       2,833       2,616       934       (2,276 )     5,912  
Interest expense
    4       18             1       996       1,019  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,920       1,789       1,710       1,793       607       9,819  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                            384       384  
Stock-based compensation
    143       143       121       34       444       885  
Acquisition-related items
                            563       563  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 5,872       4,783       4,447       2,762       718     $ 18,582  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Three Months Ended July 4, 2009
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 3,186  
Income tax benefit
                                            (160 )
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
  $ 3,999       (22 )     2,301       239       (3,491 )     3,026  
Interest expense
    27       57                   583       667  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,129       942       849       1,353       280       5,553  
Stock-based compensation
    44       60       68       6       395       573  
Acquisition-related items
                            1,627       1,627  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 6,199       1,037       3,218       1,598       (606 )   $ 11,446  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Six Months Ended July 4, 2009  
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 218  
Income tax benefit
                                            (160 )
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
  $ 9,555       (5,160 )     5,193       (168 )     (9,362 )     58  
Interest expense
    70       142                   1,076       1,288  
Depreciation and amortization
    4,132       1,908       1,655       1,900       565       10,160  
Stock-based compensation
    73       122       133       6       736       1,070  
Acquisition-related items
                            5,522       5,522  
Acquisition-related foreign exchange adjustment
                            1,370       1,370  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 13,830       (2,988 )     6,981       1,738       (93 )   $ 19,468  
 
                                   
 
                                               

 

25


Table of Contents

We believe that earnings that are based on this non-GAAP financial measure provide useful information to investors, lenders and financial analysts because (i) this measure is more comparable with the results for prior fiscal periods, and (ii) by excluding the potential volatility related to the timing and extent of nonoperating activities, such as acquisitions or revisions of the estimated value of post-closing earn-outs, such results provide a useful means of evaluating the success of our ongoing operating activities. Also, we use this information, together with other appropriate metrics, to set goals for and measure the performance of our operating businesses, and to assess our compliance with debt covenants. Management further considers Adjusted EBITDA an important indicator of operational strengths and performance of our businesses. EBITDA measures are used historically by investors, lenders and financial analysts to estimate the value of a company, to make informed investment decisions and to evaluate performance. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our results of operations with those of companies having different capital structures. In addition, a measure similar to Adjusted EBITDA is a component of our bank lending agreement, which requires certain levels of Adjusted EBITDA to be achieved. This information should not be considered in isolation or in lieu of our operating and other financial information determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In addition, because EBITDA and adjustments to EBITDA are not determined consistently by all entities, Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Backlog
Backlog is very important for our D&S segment due to the long delivery cycles for its projects. Many customers of our LXE segment typically require short delivery cycles. As a result, LXE usually converts orders into revenues within a few weeks, and it generally does not build up an order backlog that extends substantially beyond one fiscal quarter except for annual or multi-year maintenance service agreements. Our Aviation and Global Tracking businesses have customer arrangments with both short delivery cycles and delivery cycles that extend beyond the next twelve months. Our segment backlog as of July 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows (in millions):
                 
    July 3     December 31  
    2010     2009  
Aviation
  $ 38.7       49.4  
LXE
    21.5       22.0  
Defense & Space
    84.8       89.6  
Global Tracking
    19.3       17.2  
 
           
Total
  $ 164.3       178.2  
 
           
Included in the backlog of firm orders for our D&S segment was approximately $5.1 million and $22.5 million of unfunded orders, mainly for military contracts, as of July 3, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. Of the orders in backlog as of July 3, 2010, the following are expected to be filled in the following twelve months: Aviation — 75%; LXE — 72%; D&S — 56%; and Global Tracking — 68%. LXE’s backlog as of July 3, 2010 was substantially the same as the backlog reported as of December 31, 2009, but was nearly 60% higher than the backlog as of July 4, 2009, mainly due to a shortage of certain component parts from LXE’s suppliers which caused a delay in the fulfillment of LXE’s orders received in the second quarter of 2010. LXE is working closely with suppliers to identify and implement ways to resolve the sourcing issues.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the first six months of 2010, net cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2.4 million to $44.8 million as of July 3, 2010. Of the $44.8 million of cash as of July 3, 2010, $41.2 million is held by subsidiaries outside of the U.S. These undistributed earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested and are not available for use in the U.S.
The primary cash flow activities during the period included the following:
    Operating activities from continuing operations contributed $6.7 million in positive cash flow;
    We borrowed a net $12.0 million from our revolving credit facility;
    On April 30, 2010, the arbitrator issued the final award related to claims made by the purchaser of our former EMS Wireless division. We paid the final award of $8.6 million to the purchaser in the second quarter of 2010;
    We made a payment of $7.2 million for the contingent consideration agreement related to one of the acquisitions completed in 2009; and
    We invested $4.3 million in property, plant and equipment.
Operating activities from continuing operations contributed $6.7 million in positive cash flows in the first six months of 2010. We reported net earnings for the period of $4.5 million and the level of noncash charges, primarily for depreciation and amortization, exceeded increases in working capital. The growth in our business in the second quarter of 2010 resulted in increases in receivables from customers and inventories. The large sales volume toward the end of the quarter resulted in strong cash collections after the end of the quarter and we were able to reduce our borrowings under our revolving credit facility by $5 million in July.

 

26


Table of Contents

During the first six months of 2009, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $44.9 million to $42.1 million at July 4, 2009. The primary factor contributing to the decrease during the period was cash utilized for our acquisitions of Formation and Satamatics.
Operating activities contributed $22.1 million in positive cash flows in the first six months of 2009. Although we reported net earnings for the period of only $0.2 million, we nevertheless generated positive cash flow due to the level of noncash charges for depreciation and amortization, and decreases in working capital. We experienced good customer collections during the period and were able to lower inventory levels. Acquisition-related charges of $2.8 million paid in the first six months of 2009 are included as reductions of cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
During the first six months of 2009, we used $87.3 million of cash to acquire Formation and Satamatics. These acquisitions were partially funded with approximately $33.8 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We subsequently repaid approximately $5.3 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and spent $8.1 million on capital expenditures during the first six months of 2009.
We have a revolving credit facility under an agreement with a syndicate of banks with a $60 million total capacity for borrowing in the U.S. and $15 million total capacity for borrowing in Canada. The agreement also has a provision permitting an increase in the total borrowing capacity of up to an additional $50 million, subject to additional commitments from the current lenders or from new lenders. The existing lenders have no obligation to increase their commitments. The credit facility provides for borrowings through February 28, 2013, with no principal payments required prior to that date. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets, with certain exceptions for real estate that secures existing mortgages, for other permitted liens, and for certain assets outside the U.S.
As of July 3, 2010, we had $30.5 million of borrowings outstanding, $2.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, and $42.4 million available borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility. At July 3, 2010, we were in compliance with all the covenants under the credit agreement.
We expect that capital expenditures in 2010 will range from $12 million to $14 million, excluding acquisitions of businesses. These expenditures are being used to purchase equipment that increases or enhances capacity and productivity, and to upgrade the enterprise reporting system of our LXE division.
Management believes that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, cash provided from operations, and borrowings available under our credit facility will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the operating and capital expenditure needs for existing operations during the next twelve months.
Our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $20 million of our common shares. As of July 3, 2010, we had repurchased approximately 495,000 of our common shares for approximately $10.1 million. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s credit agreement. There were no repurchases under the program during the six months ended July 3, 2010.

 

27


Table of Contents

A cash payment of $7.2 million was made in the second quarter of 2010 related to acquisitions completed in 2009 based upon the achievement of performance targets in 2009, and an additional $6.8 million is due December 31, 2010 based on an agreement to settle the 2010 earn-out amount. Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these acquisitions.
On April 30, 2010, the arbitrator issued the final award related to claims made by the purchaser of our former EMS Wireless division. The final award of $8.6 million was paid by EMS to the purchaser in the second quarter of 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have $2.1 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility to satisfy performance guarantee requirements under certain customer contracts. While these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date if we failed to meet certain contractual requirements. After deducting the outstanding letters of credit, at July 3, 2010 we had $29.5 million available for borrowing in the U.S. and $12.9 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit facility.
During 2009, we completed acquisitions of two entities. Of the total purchase price of these businesses, $4.7 million of cash is in escrow accounts as of July 3, 2010 and is payable to the sellers within specified periods following the respective dates of acquisition, subject to claims we may make against the sellers.
We have an agreement with the purchaser of our former S&T/Montreal division to warrant approximately $3 million in the event of specified in-orbit failures of the Radarsat-2 payload. Based upon the available information, management believes that the outcome for this particular contingency is not probable and cannot be estimated. As a result, we have not incurred any costs to date, and have not recorded a liability as of July 3, 2010, with respect to this contingency.
We also have an agreement with the purchaser of our former S&T/Montreal division to acquire a license for $8 million in payments over a seven-year period, beginning in December 2008, for the rights to a certain satellite territory. We have a corresponding sublicense agreement with the purchaser that granted the territory rights back to the purchaser, under which we are to receive a portion of the satellite service revenues from the specific market territory over the same period. The purchaser had previously guaranteed that the revenues derived under the sublicense would equal or exceed the acquisition cost of the license. As part of the agreement to sell the net assets of S&T/Montreal, we released the purchaser from this guarantee. Without the guarantee, we estimate that our portion of the satellite service revenues will be less than the acquisition cost, and we have accordingly reflected a liability for the net cost in our consolidated balance sheet. As of July 3, 2010, we have made no payments under this license agreement. The satellite service revenues from the specific market territory included under the sublicense agreement are considerably lower than expected. We believe that sufficient efforts are not being made by the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to market this satellite service. The parties are finalizing settlement under these agreements. We believe that the net liability recorded in our consolidated balance sheet is our best estimate of the settlement amount. If a settlement is reached, it is expected to be paid in the following twelve months, and therefore the net liability is recorded as a current liability in our consolidated balance sheet as of July 3, 2010.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of July 3, 2010, our material contractual cash commitments and material other commercial commitments have not changed significantly from those disclosed in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, other than an increase in long-term debt excluding capital lease obligations of $11.3 million mainly due to an increase in our net borrowings to fund cash payments for award costs related to claims made by the purchasers of the our former EMS Wireless division of $8.6 million (see Note 13 for additional information), and earnout amounts of $7.2 million paid in the second quarter of 2010. The earnout payment also decreased our obligation of acquisition costs for earn-out provisions by the same amount.

 

28


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which often require the judgment of management in the selection and application of certain accounting principles and methods. We discuss our critical accounting policies in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies since the end of 2009.
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements
The Company has included forward-looking statements in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, or that necessarily depend upon future events, including such matters as our expectations with respect to future financial performance, future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion, market and industry developments, and the growth of our businesses and operations, are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
    economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad and their effect on capital spending in our principal markets;
    difficulty predicting the timing of receipt of major customer orders, and the effect of customer timing decisions on our results;
    our successful completion of technological development programs and the effects of technology that may be developed by, and patent rights that may be held or obtained by, competitors;
    U.S. defense budget pressures on near-term spending priorities;
    uncertainties inherent in the process of converting contract awards into firm contractual orders in the future;
    volatility of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar and their effect on purchasing power by international customers, and on the cost structure of our operations outside the U.S., as well as the potential for realizing foreign exchange gains and losses associated with assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies;
    successful resolution of technical problems, proposed scope changes, or proposed funding changes that may be encountered on contracts;
    changes in our consolidated effective income tax rate caused by the extent to which actual taxable earnings in the U.S., Canada and other taxing jurisdictions may vary from expected taxable earnings, changes in tax laws, including the provisions of the U.S. tax law that have not been extended for 2010, such as the research and development credit, and the extent to which deferred tax assets are considered realizable;
    successful transition of products from development stages to an efficient manufacturing environment;
    changes in the rate at which our products are returned for repair or replacement under warranty;
    customer response to new products and services, and general conditions in our target markets (such as logistics, and space-based communications), and whether these responses and conditions develop according to our expectations;
    the increased potential for asset impairment charges as unfavorable economic or financial market conditions, or other developments, might affect the estimated fair value of one or more of our business units;
    the success of certain of our customers in marketing our line of high-speed commercial airline communications products as a complementary offering with their own lines of avionics products;

 

29


Table of Contents

    the continued availability of financing for various mobile and high-speed data communications systems;
    risk that credit market conditions may limit the ability of some customers to obtain financing and adversely affect their ability to pay, which in turn could have an adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition;
    development of successful working relationships with local business and government personnel in connection with the distribution and manufacture of products in foreign countries;
    the demand growth for various mobile and high-speed data communications services;
    our ability to attract and retain qualified senior management and other personnel, particularly those with key technical skills;
    our ability to effectively integrate our acquired businesses, products or technologies into our existing businesses and products, and the risk that any such acquired businesses, products or technologies do not perform as expected, are subject to undisclosed or unanticipated liabilities, or are otherwise dilutive to our earnings;
    the potential effects, on cash and results of discontinued operations, of final resolution of potential liabilities under warranties and representations that we made, and obligations assumed by purchasers, in connection with our dispositions of discontinued operations;
    the availability, capabilities and performance of suppliers of basic materials, electronic components and sophisticated subsystems on which we must rely in order to perform according to contract requirements, or to introduce new products on the desired schedule;
    uncertainties associated with U.S. export controls and the export license process, which restrict our ability to hold technical discussions with customers, suppliers and internal engineering resources and can reduce our ability to obtain sales from customers outside the U.S. or to perform contracts with the desired level of efficiency or profitability; and
    our ability to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Communications Commission, and with other government regulations affecting our products and their production, service and functioning.
Further information concerning relevant factors and risks are identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part II Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009 the FASB issued two accounting standards updates that could result in revenue being recognized earlier in certain revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Both updates will become effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If the Company adopts this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, the Company will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. The Company is evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, amends the accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Among other things, ASU 2009-13:
    Eliminates the requirement for objective evidence of fair value of an undelivered item for treatment of the delivered item as a separate unit of accounting;

 

30


Table of Contents

    Requires use of the relative selling price method for allocating total consideration to elements of the arrangement instead of the relative-fair-value method or the residual method;
    Allows the use of an estimated selling price for any element within the arrangement to allocate consideration to individual elements when vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of selling price do not exist; and
    Expands the required disclosures.
ASU 2009-14, Software — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, amends the guidance for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software elements. ASU 2009-14 redefines the scope of arrangements that fall within software revenue recognition guidance by specifically excluding tangible products that contain software components that function together to deliver the essential functionality of the tangible product.
Under current guidance, products that contain software that is more than incidental to the product as a whole fall within the scope of software revenue recognition guidance, which requires, among other things, the existence of vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of all undelivered items to allow a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting. Such tangible products excluded from the requirements of software revenue recognition requirements under ASU 2009-14 would follow the revenue recognition requirements for other revenue arrangements, including the new requirements for multiple-deliverable arrangements contained in ASU 2009-13.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development arrangements in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances. This update is effective for us in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If we adopt this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, we will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. We are evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As of July 3, 2010, we had the following market-risk sensitive instruments (in thousands):
         
Government-obligations money market funds, other money market instruments, and interest-bearing time deposits, with maturity dates of less than 3 months interest payable monthly at variable rates (a weighted-average rate of 0.45% at July 3, 2010)
  $ 20,987  
 
       
Revolving credit facility with U.S. and Canadian banks, maturing in February 2013, interest payable quarterly at a variable rate (4.0% at July 3, 2010)
  $ 30,500  
A 100 basis-point change in the interest rates of our market-risk sensitive instruments would have changed interest income by approximately $51,000 for the second quarter of 2010 based upon their respective average outstanding balances.
Our revolving credit agreement includes variable interest rates based on the lead bank’s prime rate or the then-published LIBOR for the applicable borrowing period. As of July 3, 2010, we had approximately $30.5 million of borrowings outstanding in the U.S., and no borrowings outstanding in Canada under our revolving credit agreement. A 100 basis-point change in the interest rate on our revolving credit facility would have changed interest expense by approximately $60,000 for the second quarter of 2010 based upon the average outstanding borrowings under these obligations.
At July 3, 2010, we also had intercompany accounts that eliminate in consolidation but that are considered market-risk sensitive instruments because they are denominated in a currency other than the local functional currency. These include short-term amounts due to the parent (payable by international subsidiaries arising from purchase of the

 

31


Table of Contents

parent’s products for sale), intercompany sales of products from foreign subsidiaries to a U.S. subsidiary, and cash advances to foreign subsidiaries as follows:
                 
    Exchange Rate     USD  
    (USD per unit of     in thousands  
    local currency)     (reporting currency)  
 
               
Australia
  0.8427 /AUD   $ 2,565  
Canada
  0.9413 /CAD     1,517  
Sweden
  0.1310 /SEK     1,027  
Belgium
  1.2550 /EUR     642  
United Kingdon
  1.5197 /GBP     262  
Netherlands
  1.2550 /EUR     193  
Italy
  1.2550 /EUR     171  
France
  1.2550 /EUR     149  
Germany
  1.2550 /EUR     125  
 
             
Total amount subject to foreign currency risk
          $ 6,651  
 
             
We had accounts receivable and accounts payable balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the local entity at July 3, 2010 as follows:
                         
            Exchange Rate        
            Functional        
            Currency per     USD  
Currency   Functional     Denominated     Equivalent  
Denomination   Currency     Currency     (in thousands)  
Accounts Receivable
                       
USD
  CAD     1.0624     $ 15,747  
USD
  EUR     0.7968       1,161  
USD
  GBP     0.6580       243  
Other currencies             407  
 
                     
 
                  $ 17,558  
 
                     
 
                       
Accounts Payable
                       
USD
  CAD     1.0624     $ 1,228  
GBP
  USD     1.5197       184  
EUR
  GBP     0.8286       182  
Other currencies
                192  
 
                     
 
                  $ 1,786  
 
                     

 

32


Table of Contents

We also had cash accounts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the local entity at July 3, 2010 as follows:
                         
            Exchange Rate        
            Functional        
            Currency per     USD  
Currency   Functional     Denominated     Equivalent  
Denomination   Currency     Currency     (in thousands)  
USD
  CAD     1.0624     $ 3,312  
GBP
  CAD     1.6163       1,561  
GBP
  USD     1.5197       1,289  
EUR
  CAD     1.3392       222  
AUD
  CAD     0.8980       180  
Other currencies
                    487  
 
                     
 
                  $ 7,051  
 
                     
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on future fair values of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. At July 3, 2010, we had forward contracts as follows (in thousands, except average contract rate):
                               
                  Average     Fair  
    Notional       Contract     Value  
    Amount       Rate     (USD)  
Foreign currency forward contracts:
                             
U.S. dollars (sell for Canadian dollars)
    12,700   USD         1.0210     $ (534 )
Australian dollars (sell for Canadian dollars)
    350   AUD     0.9074       (4 )
British pounds (sell for U.S. dollars)
    150   GBP     1.4770       (6 )
Euros (sell for U.S. dollars)
    950   EUR     1.2406       (14 )
 
                           
 
                        $ (558 )
 
                           

 

33


Table of Contents

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)). The objective of these controls and procedures is to ensure that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, and required to be filed by it in reports under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, is effectively communicated to the Company’s CEO and CFO, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.
The CEO and CFO have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 3, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including its CEO and CFO as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the second quarter of 2010, there were no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a — 15(f) under the Exchange Act).

 

34


Table of Contents

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its common shares for the three months ended July 3, 2010:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
                                 
                            (d) Maximum Number  
                    (c) Total Number     (or Approximate  
                    of Shares     Dollar Value) of  
                    Purchased as     Shares that May Yet  
                    Part of Publicly     Be Purchased  
    (a) Total Number     (b) Average     Announced     Under the Plans or  
    of Shares     Price Paid     Plans or     Programs (3)  
Period   Purchased (1)     Per Share     Program (2)     (in millions)  
Period 4 2010 (April 4 to May 1)
                         
Period 5 2010 (May 2 to May 29)
    2,386     $ 15.94                
Period 6 2010 (May 30 to July 3)
                         
 
                       
Total
    2,386     $ 15.94           $  
 
                       
     
(1)   The category includes 2,386 shares delivered to us by employees to pay withholding taxes due upon vesting of restricted share awards.
 
(2)   During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no shares were repurchased under the Company’s $20 million repurchase program (the Program) which was initially announced on July 30, 2008. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s credit agreement.
 
(3)   This balance represents the value of shares that could be repurchased under the Program as of July 3, 2010.

 

35


Table of Contents

Item 6.   Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
         
       
 
  3.1    
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of EMS Technologies, Inc., effective March 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009).
       
 
  3.2    
Bylaws of EMS Technologies, Inc. as amended through December 21, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
       
 
  32    
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
     
*   Filed herewith

 

36


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.    
 
       
By:
  /s/ Neilson A. Mackay
 
Neilson A. Mackay
President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
  Date: August 11, 2010 
 
       
By:
  /s/ Gary B. Shell
 
Gary B. Shell
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
  Date: August 11, 2010 
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
EMS Technologies, Inc. makes available free of charge, on or through its website at www.ems-t.com, its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on the Company’s website is not part of this report.

 

37