Attached files

file filename
EX-5 - EXHIBIT 5.1 LEGAL CONSENT - Liberty Gold Corp.exhibit51_legalconsentapg.htm
EX-23 - EXHIBIT 23.1 AUDITOR CONSENT - Liberty Gold Corp.exhibit231_auditorconsentapg.htm


As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2010

 

Registration No. 333-161365

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549


 Amendment Number 3 to

FORM S-1

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 [ibosforms1a3_080610apg002.gif]

iBOS Inc.

 

Delaware

7389

80-0372385

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code)

(IRS Employer Identification Number.)

 

4879 E. La Palma Ave., Suite 201

Anaheim, CA 92807

(714) 292-1070

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Mr. Deepak Danavar

4879 E. La Palma Ave., Suite 201

Anaheim, CA 92807

(650) 521-6893

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service of process)

 

Copies of all communication to:

Frank J. Hariton, Esq.

1065 Dobbs Ferry Road

White Plains, New York 10607

Telephone: (914) 674-4373

Fax: (914) 693-2963


APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: From time to time after the effective date of this prospectus

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box.  [  ]




 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [  ]

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [  ]

 

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [  ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, a “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer [  ] 

Accelerated Filer   [  ]

Non-accelerated Filer [  ] 

Smaller Reporting Company  [X] 


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title Of Each Class

Of Securities To

Be Registered

Amount To

Be Registered

Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share

Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price

Amount of Registration Fee (1)

Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share (1)

1,240,000

$0.10

$124,000

$7.92



(1) The offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o). Our common stock is not traded on any national exchange and in accordance with Rule 457; the offering price was determined by the price shares were sold to our shareholders in a private placement memorandum. The selling shareholders may sell shares of our common stock at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common stock is quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB.  The fixed price of $0.10 has been determined as the selling price based upon the original purchase price paid by the selling shareholders of $0.10.   There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which operates the OTCBB, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved.


REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON DATES AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING UNDER SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.



- 2 -




THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION,

DATED August 6, 2010


[ibosforms1a3_080610apg004.gif]
iBOS INC.


Up to 1,240,000 Shares of Common Stock

Offering Price: $0.10 per share

As of August 6 , 2010, we had 9,520,000 shares of our common shares outstanding.

 

This is a resale prospectus for the resale offering by non-affiliate selling stockholders for up to 320,000 shares of our common stock and for the offering by our affiliates for up to 920,000 shares of our common stock .  We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares.

 

Our common stock is not traded on any public market and, although we have contacted Glendale Securities, Inc. (“Glendale”) to apply to have our common stock quoted on the OTCBB maintained by FINRA upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, they may not be successful in such efforts, and our common stock may never trade in any market.  We do not have a written agreement with Glendale Securities, Inc., regarding an application to FINRA.

 

Non-affiliate selling stockholders of 320,000 shares will sell at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common shares are quoted on the OTCBB and thereafter at prevailing market prices, or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their 920,000 shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB.

 

INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES VERY HIGH RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7.

 

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.


WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR REPRESENT ANYTHING NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANY UNAUTHORIZED INFORMATION. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT OFFER TO SELL OR BUY ANY SHARES IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL. THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS CURRENT AS OF THE DATE ON THE COVER.

 

The date of this prospectus is August 6 , 2010.



- 3 -




SUMMARY OF OUR OFFERING


The following summary information is qualified in its entirety by the detailed information and financial statements appearing elsewhere in the Prospectus.

iBOS Inc. (“iBOS”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) was initially formed as a California Corporation in April 2006 and became a Delaware Corporation in March 2009.

We provide a web-based comprehensive selection of electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry as described in our Business Services section on page 29 . Our services can help doctors, clinics, surgical or hospital based practices, and other healthcare providers and their vendors significantly improve daily insurance claims transaction administration and management as follows:

 

 

Increase office efficiencies and lower collection costs;

 

Reduce administrative workload;

 

Improve claims accuracy before submission to, and increase acceptance by, third party payers;

 

Reduce payment cycle time;

 

Improve cash flow management;

 

Increase revenue control;

 

Improve information management, financial security and provider regulatory compliance;

 

‘‘End-to-end’’ solution for claims management; and

 

Fully automate the revenue process by the use of electronic claims and remittance advice, and payment reconciliation

  

iBOS has been in operations since April 2006.  Since our inception, the appropriate people, repeatable business processes, and technology based services have been put in place with a goal to ensure financial stability and earnings growth.  Our current mission is to provide best-of-industry electronic indexing of paper medical records into a purchased EHR (Electronic health record) product for medical groups and hospitals.  Our past and present revenues have been generated solely by our electronic indexing service to our sole customer , although we are capable of providing and plan to provide our additional services in the future when our sole customer or prospective customers are ready and willing to hire us for these additional services .  We presently use a third party vendor to provide our electronic indexing service, however we plan to bring that work in-house when we have necessary funds to reasonably do so.  When a medical group and/or hospital purchases the EHR product, all of its present and future medical information is added to the patient health record within our system to streamline patient care, reduce costs and decrease errors in prescriptions given.  Standard practice requires medical groups and hospitals update and retain these electronic charts/records going back 5-7 years depending on the age and medical history of the patient.


Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain financing and upon our ability to achieve future profitable operations from the development of our business model.  Our independent registered public accounting firm (our auditors) issued its audit report including an explanatory paragraph as to an uncertainty with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.  If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose their investment.


The Offering


Securities being offered:

Up to 1,240,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 by selling stockholders.

Offering price per share:

$0.10.

Offering period:

The shares will be offered on a time to time basis by the selling stockholders.

Net proceeds:

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares.

Use of proceeds:

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares.

Number of Shares of Common Stock Authorized and Outstanding:

9,520,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized.

5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized – none issued or outstanding.

 



- 4 -




There is no trading market for our shares. We have contacted Glendale Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer, to sponsor us for inclusion on the OTCBB and thereafter we hope that a trading market will develop. Selling stockholders will sell at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common shares are quoted on the OTCBB and thereafter at prevailing market prices, or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB.

Selected Financial Information

  

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2010

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2009

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

 

 

 

Current Assets:

$            53,452  

$             76,415 

 

Total Assets:

$            53,452  

$             76,415 

 

Total Liabilities:

$            33,140  

$             76,010 

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

$            20,312  

$                  405 



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2010

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2009

Net  Revenues :

$           208,461 

$           241,212 

Cost of Services:

$           191,151 

$            218,321 

Gross Profit:

$             17,310 

$              22,891 

Operating Expenses:

$             38,533 

$              35,416 

Loss before income tax:

$          (21,223)

$           (12,525)

Income tax expenses:

$               1,600 

$                        - 

Net Loss :

$           (22,823)

$            (12,525)

Net Loss Per Common Share :

$               (0.00)

$               (0.00)

The foregoing summary information is qualified by and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying footnotes, appearing elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

RISK FACTORS


You should carefully consider the following factors in evaluating our business, operations and financial condition.  The occurrence of any the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a very limited operating history, making it difficult to accurately forecast our revenues and appropriately plan our expenses.

 

We began operations as iBOS , Inc. in April 2006.  We incurred net losses of ($22,823) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and net losses of ( $12,525 ) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 .

 

Because we have had a limited operating history, it is difficult to accurately forecast our revenues and expenses. Additionally, our operations will continue to be subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a developing new business, including, among other things, efficiently deploying our capital, developing our product and services offerings, developing and implementing our marketing campaigns and strategies and developing awareness and acceptance of our products. Our ability to generate future revenues will be dependent on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the pricing of other services, overall demand for our products, market competition and government regulation. As with any investment in a company with a limited operating history, ownership of our securities may involve a high degree of risk and is not recommended if an investor cannot reasonably bear the risk of a total loss of his or her investment.



- 5 -




Because of our limited resources and the speculative nature of our business, there is substantial doubt as to our ability to operate as a going concern.


Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain financing and upon our ability to achieve future profitable operations from the development of our business model.  Our independent registered public accounting firm (our auditors) issued its audit report including an explanatory paragraph as to an uncertainty with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.  If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose their investment.


While we are attempting to generate sufficient revenues, our cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the daily operations beyond December 2010.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private offering, but no private offering will be effected for at least six months after the date of this prospectus unless current rules are modified to shorten such period.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for us to continue as a going concern.  While we believe in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of us to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.


While we are attempting to generate sufficient revenues, our cash position may not be sufficient enough to support daily operations beyond December 2010 .  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private offering , but no private offering will be effected for at least six months after the date of this prospectus unless current rules are modified to shorten such period .  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for us to continue as a going concern.  While we believe in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of us to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.


If we do not receive additional funding to expand operations the value of our stock could be adversely affected.


As of March 31, 2010, we had cash of $29,591.  We estimate that such cash reserves are not sufficient to fund our daily operations. To fund our daily operations we must raise additional capital or employ other financing alternatives.  No assurance can be given that we will receive additional funds required to fund our daily operations.  In addition, in the absence of the receipt of additional funding we may be required to scale back current operations or cease operations completely.


As of March 31, 2010 , we had cash of $29,591 .  We estimate that such cash reserves are not sufficient to fund our daily operations. To fund our daily operations we must raise additional capital or employ other financing alternatives .  No assurance can be given that we will receive additional funds required to fund our daily operations.  In addition, in the absence of the receipt of additional funding we may be required to scale back current operations or cease operations completely .


Competition from providers of similar products and services could adversely affect our revenues and financial condition.


We compete in a rapidly evolving, highly competitive and fragmented market. We expect competition to intensify in the future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively. We believe that the main competitive factors in the medical transactions processing, billing and payment industry include effective marketing and sales, brand recognition, product quality, ease of product use, niche marketing and segmentation and value propositions. Competitive factors also include the features, functionality and cost of product and services. Many of our competitors are established, profitable and have strong attributes in many, most or all of these areas. They may be able to leverage their existing relationships to provide alternative products or services on more attractive terms or with better customer support. Other companies may also enter our markets with better products or services, greater financial and human resources and/or greater brand recognition. Competitors may continue to improve or expand current products and introduce new products. We may be perceived as relatively too small or untested to be awarded business relative to the competition. To be competitive, we will have to invest significant resources in business development, advertising and marketing. We may also have to rely on forming personal and business relationships for critical branding and rely on existing personal or business relationship leverage, which relationships may or may not be available or sufficient. We cannot assure that we will have sufficient resources to make these investments or that we will be able to make the advances necessary to be competitive. Increased competition may result in fee reductions, reduced gross margin and loss of market share. Failure to compete successfully against current or future competitors will result in less revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.



- 6 -




If our sole customer terminated our Service Agreement or if the service agreement were not renegotiated or extended past the October 1, 2011 expiration date, our business could be adversely affected.


We currently have one customer for which we rely upon for all of our revenue generation.  Unless we attract additional customers in the future to increase the number of revenue streams into us, our business success will be completely dependent upon the relationship and agreement we have with this sole customer.  Our agreement with the customer can be terminated at any time by either party with a 90-day notice.  At this time, or any time before attracting additional customers, losing our customer would result in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition and we would have to curtail operations or discontinue operations completely.


If our technology is not operational and usable it could adversely affect our business.

 

We rely almost exclusively on the technology of the third party .  We believe that we cannot operate as a stand-alone business without the operations and usability of third party software. As a result, the success of our business is materially and substantially dependent on third party software (and the availability, operability and use of such technology in whole or in part). If the technology is not usable, we will be unable to operate.

 

Our services were designed to rely upon third-party software that is non-proprietary to us, which we do not own currently.  The software is owned and operated by our third party vendor, with whom we have a Subcontract Agreement that expires October 1, 2011, and is terminable by either party with 90-day notice and is compatible with the indexing service we provide.  We will depend on these other companies for software updates, technical support and possibly for system management or for new product development. Although we believe there might be alternative suppliers for some or all of these technologies, it would take a significant period of time and money to establish relationships with alternative suppliers and substitute their technologies for technologies currently being used. The loss of any of our relationships or agreements with these suppliers could result in system shut downs and/or the inability to provide services, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. 


If our systems fail, it could interrupt operations and could adversely impact us.

 

Our operations are dependent upon our ability to support our complex network infrastructure and avoid damage from fires, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, power losses, war, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures and similar natural or manmade events. The occurrence of a natural disaster, intentional or unintentional human error or action, or other unanticipated problem could cause interruptions in the services that we provide. Any damage or failure that causes interruptions in our operations could result in loss of revenues from our customer or prospective customers, loss of our customer or prospective customers, monetary damage, or increased costs of operations, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.


If the partnership retained with our third party vendor is discontinued, or if they become insolvent, dissolve, or the quality of work becomes substandard, our ability to provide services will be greatly hindered.


The failure of our third-party vendor backbone providers to provide the data communications capacity that we require, as a result of natural disaster, operational disruption, insolvency, dissolution, or any other reason would certainly cause interruptions in the services that we provide and hinder our operations.


If our provided  technological services are replaced with newer technologies or methodologies that are more competitive and better accepted by our sole customer, potential customers, and future regulations, our ability to compete will be diminished.


Newer technologies such as encrypted medical records on computer chip cards, barcoding systems, and other methodologies could inhibit our company from continuing its services in the capacity of electronic indexing of files.  Our revenue stream would be substantially, if not completely affected and we could lose our current customer if they accepted a different process to the electronic indexing that we provide , as this is the only service we presently generate revenue from.



- 7 -




Our services were designed to rely upon third-party software that is non-proprietary to us, which we do not own currently.  The software is owned and operated by our third party vendor, with whom we have a Subcontract Agreement that expires October 1, 2011, and is terminable by either party with 90-day notice and is compatible with the indexing service we provide.  We will depend on these other companies for software updates, technical support and possibly for system management or for new product development. Although we believe there might be alternative suppliers for some or all of these technologies, it would take a significant period of time and money to establish relationships with alternative suppliers and substitute their technologies for technologies currently being used. The loss of any of our relationships or agreements with these suppliers could result in system shut downs and/or the inability to provide services, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

If our systems fail, it could interrupt operations and could adversely impact us.

 

Our operations are dependent upon our ability to support our complex network infrastructure and avoid damage from fires, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, power losses, war, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures and similar natural or manmade events. The occurrence of a natural disaster, intentional or unintentional human error or action, or other unanticipated problem could cause interruptions in the services that we provide. Any damage or failure that causes interruptions in our operations could result in loss of revenues from our customer or prospective customers, loss of our customer or prospective customers, monetary damage, or increased costs of operations, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.


If the partnership retained with our third party vendor is discontinued, or if they become insolvent, dissolve, or the quality of work becomes substandard, our ability to provide services will be greatly hindered.


The failure of our third-party vendor backbone providers to provide the data communications capacity that we require, as a result of natural disaster, operational disruption, insolvency, dissolution, or any other reason would certainly cause interruptions in the services that we provide and hinder our operations.


If our provided technological services are replaced with newer technologies or methodologies that are more competitive and better accepted by our sole customer, potential customers, and future regulations, our ability to compete will be diminished.


Newer technologies such as encrypted medical records on computer chip cards, barcoding systems, and other methodologies could inhibit our company from continuing its services in the capacity of electronic indexing of files.  Our revenue stream would be substantially, if not completely affected and we could lose our current customer if they accepted a different process to the electronic indexing that we provide, as this is the only service we presently generate revenue from.


If we are unable to retain key personnel it will have an adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain ‘‘key man’’ life insurance policies on our key personnel.

 

Our operations have been and will continue be dependent on the efforts of Mr. Deepak Danavar, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ravi Sharma, our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, and Mr. James Villalobos, our Vice President of Sales and Marketing. The development of improvements to our products and services, as well as the development of new products is dependent on retaining the services of certain technical personnel who were involved in the development of our products and services. The loss of key management, the inability to secure or retain such key personnel with unique knowledge of our products and services and the technology and programming employed as part of our products and services, or an inability to attract and retain sufficient numbers of other qualified management personnel would adversely affect our business, products and services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

We do not have ‘‘key man’’ life insurance policies for Mr. Danavar, Mr. Sharma or Mr. Villalobos. Even if we were to obtain ‘‘key man’’ insurance for Mr. Danavar, Mr. Sharma or Mr. Villalobos of which there can be no assurance, the amount of such policies may not be sufficient to cover losses experienced by us as a result of the loss of Mr. Danavar, Mr. Sharma or Mr. Villalobos.


Our management serves us on a part time basis and conflicts may arise.




- 8 -




Mr. Danavar, Mr. Sharma, and Mr. Villalobos perform employee like services for our company on a part time basis.  Mr. Danavar and the other officers work approximately 10 hours each per week for the benefit of iBOS.  Employee-like services provided by the officers and directors of iBOS were not compensated in the fiscal year ended 2010 or at any time since and no employee contracts with them have been entered into.  These individuals have other employment and responsibilities outside of iBOS.  While they will each seek to give us sufficient time to allow us to operate on a basis that is beneficial to our shareholders, this goal may not be accomplished and our operating results may be negatively impacted by the unavailability of our key personnel.

 

If we fail to attract skilled personnel it could adversely affect our business.

 

Our future success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. If we are unable to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future or there are any delays in hiring required personnel, particularly technical, sales, marketing and financial personnel, it could have a material adverse affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

We will need to expand our sales operations and marketing operations in order to increase market awareness of our products and generate revenues. New sales personnel and marketing personnel will require training and it will take time to achieve full productivity. Competition for such personnel is intense. We cannot be certain that we will successfully attract and retain additional qualified personnel.

 

We are subject to substantial government regulation which may adversely affect the way we conduct our business and the costs of conducting our business.  The United States healthcare industry is currently changing and new legislation, offered incentives, and regulations may inhibit our business.


The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences.  Federal and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to reform or amend the U.S. healthcare system at both the federal and state level and to change healthcare financing and reimbursement systems, such as the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare, lower reimbursement rates or otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. Current or future government regulations or healthcare reform measures, such as the healthcare reform legislation that was enacted in 2010, may affect our business. Healthcare industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our products and services.


The healthcare industry and standards of medical record keeping may be currently changing due to proposed healthcare reform and passed legislation.  There are many companies that have electronic medical record technologies that have incentives to replace paper and electronically indexed recordkeeping.  A healthcare bill was passed by the Unites States Congress and Senate recently that will open pathways for an evolving healthcare industry that could be detrimental to our current method of indexing medical records.  On January 13, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology published two much-anticipated and coordinated sets of regulations.  These regulations establish the requirements for eligible providers to earn Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record (EHR) incentives.  The Department of Health and Human Services accepted comments on these regulations through March 15, 2010.  Eligible hospitals and professionals, vendors, would-be certifying bodies and others interested in or affected by the regulations should thus consider submitting comments to HHS, with a particular emphasis on requesting the “grandfathering” of existing, successful EHR technology.

 

Our medical billing and collection activities, for which we have no current customer utilizing, are governed by numerous federal and state civil and criminal laws. Federal and state regulators use these laws to investigate healthcare providers and companies that provide lending, billing and collection services. In connection with these laws, we may be subjected to federal or state government investigations and possible penalties may be imposed, false claims actions may have to be defended, private payers may file claims against us, and we may be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other government-funded healthcare programs. Some of these laws may carry strict liability provisions that impose responsibilities and liabilities on us without any wrongdoing or negligence on our part.

 

We may become the subject of false claims litigation or additional investigations relating to our possible future lending, billing and collection activities, even when simply passing on claims originating from and edited by third parties for content. Any such proceeding or investigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 



- 9 -




Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, final rules were published regarding standards for electronic transactions as well as standards for privacy and security of individually identifiable health information. The HIPAA rules set new or higher standards for the healthcare industry in handling healthcare transactions and information, with penalties for noncompliance. We have incurred and we will continue to incur costs to comply with these rules. Compliance with these rules may prove to be more costly than we currently anticipate. Failure to comply with such rules may have a material adverse effect on our business and may subject us to civil and criminal penalties as well as loss of our sole customer or any prospective customers.

 

We will rely upon third parties to provide data elements to process electronic medical claims in a HIPAA compliant format. While we believe we will be fully and properly prepared to process electronic medical claims in a HIPAA-compliant format, there can be no assurance that third parties, including healthcare providers and payers, will likewise be prepared to supply all the data elements required to process electronic medical claims and make electronic remittance under HIPAA's standards. We have made and expect to continue to make investments in product enhancements to support customer operations that are regulated by HIPAA. Responding to HIPAA's impact may require us to make investments in new products or charge higher prices.

 

HIPAA, in part, governs the collection, use, storage and disclosure of health information for the purpose of safeguarding the privacy and security of such information. Persons who believe health information has been misused or disclosed improperly may file complaints against offending parties, which may lead to investigation and potential civil and criminal penalties from Federal or state governments.


The passage of HIPAA is part of a wider healthcare reform initiative. We expect that the debate on healthcare reform will continue. We also expect that the federal government as well as state governments will pass laws and issue regulations addressing healthcare issues and reimbursement of healthcare providers. We cannot predict whether the governmental-bodies regulators will enact new legislation and regulations, and, if enacted, whether such new developments will have an adverse affect on our business, operating results or financial condition.


In addition, recent proposed legislation enacted by the United States Congress and regulations thereunder, if enacted, may place substantial burdens upon us and require that we invest in additional software and equipment.  In addition, this law will force us to ensure that we have the following protocols in place to comply with its strict security guidelines:


Security breach notification is one of the key measures of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act designed to further the adoption of electronic health records systems by providing more stringent protections for patient information.

HIPAA covered entities and their business associates must report security breaches in compliance with the new rules.

Covered Entities must timely notify affected individuals if their unsecured protected health information was the subject of a security breach. In doing so, Covered Entities also must report such breaches to the Department of Health & Human Services (either concurrently or annually) and, in certain circumstances, the media.

Business Associates must timely notify their covered entities of reportable security breaches such that the covered entities can make reports to affected individuals and others as required by the regulations.  The regulations require business associates to provide notice to covered entities without unreasonable delay, and no later than 60 days from the date that the business associates discovers the breach, or should have discovered it using reasonable diligence. Business associates, to the extent possible, must identify each affected individual and provide such information to the Covered Entity.


We currently have these protocols in place for compliance with the HITECH act.  However, if there are changes made in the future to legislation or regulations, we need to review our processes for compliance.

Many healthcare providers who are potential customers may have existing systems that do not generate electronic files in a HIPAA-compliant format, which will limit the amount of services we can provide to and the amount of revenues that can be generated from such healthcare providers.

 



- 10 -




Many healthcare providers have practice management systems that do not have electronic interfaces which produce a HIPAA compliant form. If the interface doesn't exist, they must purchase a new system from a third party, which may be expensive and not a desirable business proposition for such healthcare providers. If claims cannot be submitted electronically, the claims data must be manually entered into our system, which can be time consuming and duplicative of work already done by a healthcare provider. Manually entering the data also subjects claims to greater risk of human error in the data entry process. While we believe we can provide solutions to healthcare providers to enable them to establish electronic interfaces to submit claims electronically in a HIPAA compliant manner, there can be no assurance healthcare providers will be willing to implement the solutions that we propose. If healthcare providers can not supply electronic medical claims and such claims are processed manually rather than electronically, services that we can provide will be greatly limited and our ability to generate revenues from such providers will be curtailed which could result in a material adverse affect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

 

We may make errors in processing information provided by our sole customer or future customers and, as a result, we may suffer losses.

 

We will receive detailed information provided by our customer or future customers.  Even if our customer or future customer provides full and accurate disclosure of all material information to be submitted as part of a claim for payment, such information may be misinterpreted or incorrectly analyzed. Mistakes by our systems or personnel may cause us to incur liability to our customer or future customers in connection with such mistakes.

 

Solutions and services that we offer may subject us to product liability claims.

 

Solutions that we sell may fail to perform in a variety of ways, and services that we provide may not meet our sole customer’s expectations or any future customers’ expectations, or which faces frequent internet service interruptions, which take it off-line. Such problems would seriously harm our credibility, market acceptance of our products and the value of our brands. In addition, such problems may result in liability for damages arising out of service interruption. The occurrence of some of these types of problems may seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.


Our systems are subject to certain security risks which can adversely affect our operations.


Despite the implementation of security measures, our systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses and other disruptive problems. Companies have experienced, and may experience, interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or intentional actions of internet users, current and former employees or others. Unauthorized access could also potentially jeopardize the security of our sole customer or security of future customers and our confidential information stored in our computer systems, which may result in liability to customers and also may deter potential customers from using our products and services. Although we intend to continue to implement industry-standard security measures, such measures have been circumvented in the past, and there can be no assurance that measures that we implement will not be circumvented in the future. Eliminating computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service to our customers, such interruptions, delays or cessation of services may result in a loss of customers or subject us to potential liability for actions out of such interruptions, delays or cessation of services.


We intend to become a public company subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that will require us to incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of such reports.  These additional costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit. 


Following the effective date of our  registration  statement  of which  this prospectus is a art,  we will be required to file  periodic  reports with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and the  rules and  regulations  promulgated thereunder.  In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis.  Moreover, our legal counsel will have to review and assist in the preparation of such reports.  The costs charged by these professionals for such services cannot be accurately predicted at this time because factors such as the number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major affect on the amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys.  However, our incurring these costs will obviously be an expense to our operations and thus have a negative effect on our ability to meet our overhead requirements and earn a profit. We may be exposed to potential risks resulting from new requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

  



- 11 -




Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended by SEC Release 33-8934 on June 26, 2008 we will be required, beginning with our fiscal year ending March 31, 2011, to include in our annual report our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. Furthermore, in the following year, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to report separately on whether it believes that we have maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting. We have not yet completed any assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We expect to incur additional expenses and diversion of management’s time as a result of performing the system and process evaluation, testing and remediation required in order to comply with the management certification and auditor attestation requirements.


Our officers have no experience in managing a public company.


Our officers have no previous experience in managing a public company and we do not have a sufficient number of employees to segregate responsibilities and may be unable to afford increasing our staff or engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. During the course of our testing, we may identify other deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.


Our officers do not have employment agreements with us and could cease working for us at any time causing us to cease our operations. 


Our officers do not have employment agreements with us.  In the absence of employment agreements with a restrictive covenant on the part of the employee, any of our officers could leave us at any time or commence working for a competitive company.  Furthermore, California law, under which we operate, may cast substantial doubt on the enforceability of any restrictive covenant that we may obtain from our officers in the future.  Accordingly, the continued services of our officers cannot be assured. If any of our officers were to cease working for us, we may have to cease operations.


Dependence on Key Customer


One (1) customer accounted for all of total sales for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.   Currently, a reduction in sales from or loss of this sole customer would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.


Risks Related to Our Common Stock


Currently, there is no public market for our securities, and there can be no assurances that any public market will ever develop or that our common stock will be quoted for trading and, even if quoted, it is likely to be subject to significant price fluctuations.


Prior to the date of this prospectus, there has not been any established trading market for our common stock, and there is currently no public market whatsoever for our securities. We have requested that Glendale Securities, Inc.  file an application with FINRA on our behalf so as to be able to quote the shares of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") maintained by FINRA commencing upon the effectiveness of our registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. There can be no assurance as to whether such market maker will actually file the application or if that application will be accepted by FINRA. We are not permitted to file such application on our own behalf. If the application is accepted, there can be no assurances as to whether any market for our shares will develop or the prices at which our common stock will trade. If the application is accepted, we cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to the development of an active, liquid trading market. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders for investors.




- 12 -




In addition, our common stock is unlikely to be followed by any market analysts, and there may be few institutions acting as market makers for the common stock. Either of these factors could adversely affect the liquidity and trading price of our common stock. Until our common stock is fully distributed and an orderly market develops in our common stock, if ever, the price at which it trades is likely to fluctuate significantly. Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors, including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business, including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these Risk Factors, investor perception, and general economic and market conditions. No assurances can be given that an orderly or liquid market will ever develop for the shares of our common stock.  Because of the anticipated low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in these securities. See "Plan of Distribution" subsection entitled "Selling Shareholders and any purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions."

 

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock, which may have rights and preferences detrimental to the rights of the holders of our common shares.

We are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not issued any shares of preferred stock. Our preferred stock may bear such rights and preferences, including dividend and liquidation preferences, as the Board of Directors may fix and determine from time to time. Any such preferences may operate to the detriment of the rights of the holders of the common stock being offered hereby.

Our articles of incorporation provide for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limit their liability which may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.


Our articles of incorporation and applicable Delaware law provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against attorney's fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with or activities on our behalf. We will also bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person's promise to repay us, therefore if it is ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by us, which we will be unable to recoup.

 

We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against these types of liabilities, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will (unless in the opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter if it were to occur is likely to be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, either of which factors are likely to materially reduce the market and price for our shares, if such a market ever develops.

 

We anticipate our stock being quoted on the OTCBB which may result in limited liquidity and the inability of our stockholders to maintain accurate price quotations of their stock.


Until our shares of common stock qualify for inclusion in the NASDAQ system, if ever, the trading of our securities, if any, will be in the over-the-counter market which is commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of our securities.

 

Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions which will create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.


SEC Rule 15g-9 (as most recently amended and effective on September 12, 2005) establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks for the immediately foreseeable future. This classification severely and adversely affects the market liquidity for our common stock. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker-dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker-dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

  



- 13 -




In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker-dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.


The broker-dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

 

 

the basis on which the broker-dealer made the suitability determination, and

 

that the broker-dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.


Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.


Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell their shares in the secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our securities, if and when our securities become publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our securities. Our shares in all probability will be subject to such penny stock rules for the foreseeable future and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their securities.


We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock.


As a privately held Subchapter S Corporation we made distributions to our shareholders in the nature of dividends. However, in 2009 we became a publicly held Subchapter C Corporation. Since converting to C Corporation status we have not paid any dividends on our common stock and there are no plans for paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.


We intend to retain earnings, if any, to provide funds for the implementation of our business plan. We do not intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that holders of our common stock will receive any additional cash, stock or other dividends on their shares of our common stock until we have funds which the Board of Directors determines can be allocated to dividends.


If a market develops for our shares, sales of our shares relying upon rule 144 may depress prices in that market by a material amount.


All of the outstanding shares of our common stock are "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who has held restricted securities for a prescribed period may, under certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed 1.0% of a company's outstanding common stock. The alternative average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior to the sale is not available to our shareholders being that the OTCBB (if and when listed thereon) is not an "automated quotation system" and, accordingly, market based volume limitations are not available for securities quoted only over the OTCBB. As a result of revisions to Rule 144 which became effective on or about February 15, 2008, there is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affiliate (i.e., a stockholder who has not been an officer, director or control person for at least 90 consecutive days) after the restricted securities have been held by the owner for a period of one year. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Act, if available, or pursuant to registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.


Any trading market that may develop may be restricted by virtue of state securities "Blue Sky" laws which prohibit trading absent compliance with individual state laws.




- 14 -




These restrictions may make it difficult or impossible to sell shares in those states. There is no public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any public market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or securities regulations laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as "Blue Sky" laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the “Blue Sky” laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state “Blue Sky” law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. These restrictions prohibit the secondary trading of our common stock. We currently do not intend and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in approximately 17 states which do not offer manual exemptions and require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one.


Dilution


We are not offering any shares in this registration statement. All shares are being registered on behalf of our selling shareholders who may offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common shares are quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board or another quotation medium and thereafter at prevailing market prices, or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB..  Accordingly, we have not included information on dilution in this Prospectus.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of the common stock offered by the selling stockholders. We are registering 1,240,000 of our 9,520,000 currently outstanding shares for resale to provide the holders thereof with freely tradable securities, but the registration of such shares does not necessarily mean that any of such shares will be offered or sold by the holders thereof.


SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

 

From March 2009 through July 2009, 9,520,000 shares of common stock were issued to 36 individuals in increments as follows :


-

On March 7, 2009, 9,000,000 shares were issued to our CEO, CFO, and VP of Sales and Marketing, in exchange for all of their ownership interests in iBOS, Inc, a California corporation which became our wholly owned subsidiary.

 

-

On March 8, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares to our counsel and promoter, Frank J. Hariton.


-

During July 2009 an additional 320,000 shares were issued to 32 individuals for $32,000 in cash or $0.10 per share. These shares were issued in a private offering pursuant to Regulation D Rule 506 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that began in May of 2009 and closed in August of 2009, and each of the investors therein represented in writing that such investor was an accredited investor as that term is defined in Regulation D and that he/she was acquiring the shares for his/her own account and for investment. A copy of such subscription agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.


No underwriter participated in the foregoing transactions, and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid, nor was any general solicitation or general advertising conducted. The securities bear a restrictive legend and stop transfer instructions are noted on our stock transfer records.

 

All shares offered under this prospectus are being offered by selling shareholders and may be sold from time to time for the account of the selling stockholders named in the following table. The table also contains information regarding each selling stockholder's beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of September 4, 2009, and as adjusted to give effect to the sale of the shares offered hereunder.


Other than the relationships described below, none of the selling stockholders had or have any material relationship with us.  6 of the 33 non-affiliate selling stockholders are a family member of the current directors and officers of our company, and such individuals contacted each of the selling stockholders on an individual basis.




- 15 -




The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders as of the date of this prospectus, and the number of shares of common stock covered by this prospectus.


SELLING SECURITYHOLDER

AND RELATIONSHIP TO

THE COMPANY OR ITS

AFFILIATES, IF ANY

SHARES OWNED

(NUMBER AND

PERCENTAGE)

BEFORE OFFERING

SHARES OFFERED

SHARES OWNED

(NUMBER AND

PERCENTAGE)

AFTER OFFERING

 

 

 

 

Deepak Danavar

President and CEO

3,000,000 

31.51%

240,000 

2,760,000 

29.0%

Ravi Sharma

CFO and Secretary

3,000,000 

31.51%

240,000 

2,760,000 

29.0%

James Villalobos (1)

VP Sales and Marketing

3,000,000 

31.51%

240,000 

2,760,000 

29.0%

Frank J. Hariton (2)

Counsel and Promoter

200,000 

2.10%

200,000 

0%

Mansi Mehta

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Dipti Chaudhari

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Komal Chaudhari

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Naimesh Chaudhari

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Inder Sharma (3)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Nicole Sharma (4)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Rama Sharma (5)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Pritesh Kothary

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Amit Verma

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Kinnari Bhavsar

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Vipul Bhavsar

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Shanta Dandappanavar (6)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Akash Dandappanavar (7)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Arvin Taneja

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Sachin Taneja

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Michael Hamilton

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Andrew Nash

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Pamela Nash

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Jonathan Alcabes

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Jermichael Webster

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Sarah Villalobos (8)

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Caryle Jones

10,000 

10,000 

0%

John Jones

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Anthony Gonzalez

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Jason Altunian

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Eleanor Altunian

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Louise Rodriguez

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Carolyn Peterson

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Cary Farrell

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Kerry Kreczmer

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Cameron Carty

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Kelly Carty

10,000 

10,000 

0%

Total

9,520,000 

100.00%

1,240,000 

8,280,000 

87.0%

 *Percentage is only indicated if greater than 1%


(1)  Mr. James Villalobos’ shares listed here do not include 10,000 shares owned by his wife, Sarah Villalobos, that he is considered to be a beneficial owner of.



- 16 -





(2)  Mr. Frank J. Hariton is the corporate counsel to our company and a promoter, he is deemed an affiliate.


(3)  Mr. Inder Sharma is the father of CFO and Secretary, Ravi Sharma.


(4)  Nicole Sharma is the sister of CFO and Secretary, Ravi Sharma.


(5)  Mrs. Rama Sharma is the mother of CFO and Secretary, Ravi Sharma.


(6)  Mrs. Shanta Dandappanavar is the mother of President and CEO, Deepak Danavar.


(7)  Mr. Akash Dandappanavar is the brother of President and CEO, Deepak Danavar.


(8)  Mrs. Sarah Villalobos is the wife of the VP of Sales and Marketing, James Villalobos.


None of the Selling Stockholders are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers.


Mr. Deepak Danavar, Mr. Ravi Sharma, and Mr. James Villalobos, our officers and directors, and Mr. Frank J. Hariton, our corporate counsel and a promoter, are Selling Stockholders and will be considered to be statutory underwriters for purposes of this offering and the other selling shareholders may be deemed underwriters.  Mr. Deepak Danavar’s, Mr. Ravi Sharma’s, Mr. Hariton’s, and Mr. James Villalobos’ intentions are to remain with us regardless of whether they sell all or a substantial portion of their stockholdings in us.  Mr. Deepak Danavar, Mr. Ravi Sharma, and Mr. James Villalobos are nevertheless offering 8.3% of their shareholder interest, (240,000 shares out of their total holdings of 3,000,000 shares) in this offering, and Mr. Hariton is offering 100% of his shareholder interest (200,000 shares out of his holdings of 200,000 shares).  The 10,000 shares being offered for resale by Mr Villalobos’ wife, Sarah Villalobos, are not included in this total.  In aggregate, 9.66% of all outstanding common shares (9.77% including Sarah Villalobos’) are being offered by affiliates, since otherwise sales by Mr. Deepak Danavar, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Hariton, and Mr. James Villalobos would be restricted to 1% (or approximately 380,800 shares) of all outstanding shares every three months in accordance with Rule 144. As officers, control persons, or affiliates of iBOS, Mr. Deepak Danavar, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Hariton, and Mr. James Villalobos may not avail themselves of the provisions of Rule 144(k) which otherwise would permit a non-affiliate to sell an unlimited number of restricted shares provided that the one-year holding period requirement is met.

 

Selling Stockholders will sell at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common shares are quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board or another quotation medium and thereafter at prevailing market prices, or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB.

 

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

 

There is no established public market for the common equity being registered. Our shares that were issued at $0.10 per share were issued in July of 2009 as part of an offering that began in May of 2009 and closed in August of 2009.  Accordingly, in determining the offering price, we selected $0.10 per share, which was the highest and most recent price at which we have issued our shares.


DIVIDEND POLICY

 

As a privately held Subchapter S Corporation we made distributions to our shareholders in the nature of dividends. However, in 2009 we became a publicly held Subchapter C Corporation. Since converting to C Corporation status we have not paid any dividends on our common stock and there are no plans for paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.  Moreover, any future credit facilities might contain restrictions on our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock. We plan to retain all earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future for use in the operation of our business and to fund the pursuit of future growth. Future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, capital requirements and on such other factors as our Board of Directors, in its discretion, may consider relevant.

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 



- 17 -




The selling stockholders may offer the shares at various times in one or more of the following transactions:

 

on any market that might develop;

  

in transactions other than market transactions;

  

by pledge to secure debts or other obligations;

  

Purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account; or

  

in a combination of any of the above.


Selling stockholders will sell at a fixed price of $0.10 per share until our common shares are quoted on the Over- the-Counter Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices, with the exception of our three officers and a promoter, who are deemed to be underwriters and must offer their shares at a fixed price of $0.10 per share even if our shares are quoted on the OTCBB. In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, the shares may be sold only through registered or licensed brokers-dealers.


The selling stockholders may use broker-dealers to sell shares. If this happens, broker-dealers will either receive discounts or commissions from the selling stockholders, or they will receive commissions from purchasers of shares for whom they have acted as agents. To date, no discussions have been held or agreements reached with any broker-dealers. No broker–dealer participating in the distribution of the shares covered by this prospectus may charge commissions in excess of 8% on any sales made hereunder.


Our affiliates and/or promoters who are offering their shares for resale and any broker-dealers who act in connection with the sale of the shares hereunder will be deemed to be "underwriters" of this offering within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commissions they receive and proceeds of any sale of the shares may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.


Selling shareholders and any purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our common stock will be subject to "penny stock" restrictions.


We will pay all expenses incident to the registration, offering and sale of the shares other than commissions or discounts of underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. We have also agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.


This offering will terminate on the earlier of the:

a) date on which the shares are eligible for resale without restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or

b) date on which all shares offered by this prospectus have been sold by the selling stockholders.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.


If any of the selling shareholders enter into an agreement after the effectiveness of our registration statement to sell all or a portion of their shares in the Company to a broker-dealer as principal and the broker-dealer is acting as underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to its registration statement identifying the broker-dealer, providing the required information on the Plan of Distribution, revising disclosures in its registration statement as required and filing the agreement as an exhibit to its registration statement.

 

Until our shares of common stock qualify for inclusion in the NASDAQ system, if ever, the trading of our securities, if any, will be in the over-the-counter markets, which are commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the price of, our securities.


SEC Rule 15g-9 (as most recently amended and effective September 12, 2005) establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks for the immediate foreseeable future. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker-dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker-dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

 



- 18 -




In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker-dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.


The broker-dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the suitability determination, and that the broker-dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.


Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stock in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. The above-referenced requirements may create a lack of liquidity, making trading difficult or impossible, and accordingly, shareholders may find it difficult to dispose of our shares.


STATE SECURITIES – BLUE SKY LAWS

 

There is no public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or securities regulations laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as "Blue Sky" laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the “Blue Sky” laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state “Blue Sky” law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Accordingly, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold the common stock for an indefinite period of time.


Selling Security holders may contact us directly to ascertain procedures necessary for compliance with Blue Sky Laws in the applicable states relating to Sellers and/or Purchasers of our shares of common stock.

 

We intend to apply for listing in a nationally recognized securities manual which, once published, will provide us with "manual" exemptions in 33 states as indicated in CCH Blue Sky Law Desk Reference at Section 6301 entitled "Standard Manuals Exemptions."


Thirty-three states have what is commonly referred to as a "manual exemption" for secondary trading of securities such as those to be resold by selling stockholders under this registration statement. In these states, so long as we obtain and maintain a Standard and Poor's Corporate Manual or another acceptable manual, secondary trading of our common stock can occur without any filing, review or approval by state regulatory authorities in these states. These states are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. We cannot secure this listing, and thus this qualification, until after our registration statement is declared effective. Once we secure this listing, secondary trading can occur in these states without further action.

 

We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in other states which require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders.


LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY REGULATION M

 

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to our common stock for a period of two business days prior to the commencement of such distribution. In addition and without limiting the foregoing, each selling stockholder will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the associated rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M, which provisions may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the selling stockholders and have informed them of the need for delivery of copies of this prospectus to purchasers at or prior to the time of any sale of the shares offered hereby. We assume no obligation to deliver copies of this prospectus or any related prospectus supplement.




- 19 -




LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We are not a party to any pending litigation and, to the best of our knowledge, none is threatened or anticipated.


DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS


Our directors, officers and significant employees are as follows:


Name

Age

Position

Deepak Danavar

36

President, CEO, Chairman

Ravi Sharma

26

CFO, Secretary, Director

James Villalobos

40

Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Director

Business Experience


Deepak Danavar, Chairman, President and CEO - Mr. Danavar earned a B.S. in Biology from University of California, Irvine, a Master of Public Health, Health Services Administration degree from San Diego State University, and an M.B.A from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.  Mr. Danavar joined iBOS with 15 years of health care industry experience.  He held various positions at Merck pharmaceuticals from 2001 to 2003 coordinating market development and sales teams for new product launches, and from 2003 to 2008, held several positions with Boston Scientific CRM and Guidant Corporation with responsibilities for sales development and marketing of cardiac medical devices.  From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Danavar was a product manager for the Global Marketing Group at St. Jude Medical where he managed the strategic marketing efforts and development of various cardiac medical devices.   Currently, and for the last six months, he has been the Director of Sales at Signostics Medical.


Ravi Sharma, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director - Mr. Sharma graduating from the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business, where his emphasis focused on management and organization; he also received a minor from the School of International Relations to deal with the global needs of today’s businesses.  He joined iBOS with significant expertise in transactional and financial experience.  From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Sharma worked at the Trust Company of the West analyzing the RMBS group’s portfolio of debt securities, then worked at Union Bank of California for the remainder of the year in the position of Institutional Sales, and then worked as an Associate for Bank of America Securities (formerly, Countrywide Securities) from 2005 to 2008.  Finally, from 2008 to the present, Mr. Sharma has been an independent consultant in the renewable energy sector with Silo Energy, LLC, to help large institutions, municipalities, and agencies “go green”: promoting environmentally sensitive solutions that also have a dramatic effect on increasing these entities’ bottom-line.


James Villalobos, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Director - Mr. Villalobos joined iBOS with 21 years of experience within the health care industry.  He spent four years in the United States Navy from February 15th 1988, to March 15th 1992.  The four years of active duty included eight months of service in the Persian Gulf War in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm.  These duties included working at Naval Hospital Long Beach for two years, and then serving in the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing Division in El Toro California his last two years.  Starting in 1992, he worked as a nurse assistant in various health care facilities, until graduating in 1997 from the University of Southern California with a Bachelor's Degree in Science and Nursing.  From 1997-1999, he worked as a RN in various health care environments such as the ER/Trauma, and the Cardiopulmonary floor at St. Mary Medical Center, Long Beach California.  Also during this time Mr. Villalobos worked as a Home Health Nurse and an Inpatient Hospice nurse at Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital in Whittier, California. In 1999, he started working at Merck and Co, Inc, in Pharmaceutical sales.  In 2001, he earned promotion to establish market development for Merck's four billion dollar cardiovascular market.  In this role he established key thought leaders, analyzed key managed care segments critical for successful product launch, and performed extensive market development including managed care penetration.  In 2004, Mr. Villalobos earned a promotion into Merck Vaccine Infectious Diseases.  Here he performed a market development role, which including the successful launch of Rotavirus vaccine and Cervical Cancer Vaccine.  He also acted as the point employee for GPO contracts and Physician Order contracts.  Now, still employed by Merck, he presently performs duties relating to market share management and growth for all Merck Vaccines.


American Commercial Lighting, Inc. is partially owned by our officer Ravi Sharma’s father.  American Commercial Lighting, Inc. holds a formal lease to the premises, providing office space to us at no cost.  No formal lease exists between us and American Commercial Lighting, Inc.  The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize rent expense in its financial statements.  The office space provides office equipment and services needed to operate our business, including furniture, phones, internet connection, supplies, and printer use.




- 20 -




SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITY HOLDERS


The information in the following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our shares of common stock as of the date of this prospectus, by: (i) the highest paid person who is our officers and directors (or in the alternative, each officer and director); (ii) all officers and directors as a group; (iii) each shareholder who beneficially owns more than 5% of any class of our securities, including those shares subject to outstanding options. A person deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities that such a person has a right to acquire within 60 days.


Name and address of owner

Amount owned before the offering

Amount owned after the offering

Percent of Class After Offering

Deepak Danavar

3,000,000 Shares

2,760,000 Shares

29.0%

Ravi Sharma

3,000,000 Shares

2,760,000 Shares

29.0%

James Villalobos(1)

3,000,000 Shares

2,760,000 Shares

29.0%

All officers and directors as a group (three [3] persons)

9,000,000 Shares

8,280,000 Shares

87.0%

(1)  James Villalobos’ shares listed here do not include 10,000 shares owned by his wife, Sarah Villalobos, that he is considered to be a beneficial owner of.


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

 

Introduction

 

iBOS, Inc. was incorporated in April, 2006 as a California  corporation and was reincorporated in Delaware in March 2009 in a transaction in which the newly-formed corporation issued 9,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of iBOS, Inc. iBOS is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

 

Preferred Stock

 

iBOS is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. No shares of preferred stock have been designated, issued or outstanding. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with voting, liquidation, conversion, or other rights that could adversely affect the rights of the holders of the common stock. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.


Among other rights, our Board of Directors may determine, without further vote or action by our stockholders:

 

 

the number of shares and the designation of the series;

 

whether to pay dividends on the series and, if so, the dividend rate, whether dividends will be cumulative and, if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights of priority of payment of dividends on shares of the series;

 

whether the series will have voting rights in addition to the voting rights provided by law and, if so, the terms of the voting rights;

 

whether the series will be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any other class or series of stock and, if so, the terms and conditions of conversion or exchange;

 

whether or not the shares of the series will be redeemable and, if so, the dates, terms and conditions of redemption and whether there will be a sinking fund for the redemption of that series and, if so, the terms and amount of the sinking fund; and

 

the rights of the shares of the series in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the relative rights or priority, if any, of payment of shares of the series.

 



- 21 -




We presently do not have plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. However, preferred stock could be used to dilute a potential hostile acquirer. Accordingly, any future issuance of preferred stock or any rights to purchase preferred shares may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. This may delay, defer or prevent a change of control in our Company or an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The issuance of preferred stock also could decrease the amount of earnings attributable to, and assets available for distribution to, the holders of our common stock and could adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of our common stock.


Common Stock


iBOS Inc. is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock. There are 9,520,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding at September 4, 2009 which shares are held by 36 shareholders. The holders of our common stock:

 

 

Have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available for payment of dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors;

 

are entitled to share ratably in all of the assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs;

 

do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights, or redemption; and

 

are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters submitted to stockholders for a vote at any meeting of stockholders.

 

See also “Plan of Distribution” and “Risk Factors” regarding negative implications of being classified as a "Penny Stock."


Authorized but Un-issued Capital Stock

 

Delaware law does not require stockholder approval for any issuance of authorized shares. However, the marketplace rules of the NASDAQ, which would apply only if our common stock were listed on the NASDAQ and we have no present plans for any such listing application, require stockholder approval of certain issuances of common stock equal to or exceeding 20% of the then-outstanding voting power or then-outstanding number of shares of common stock, including in connection with a change of control of iBOS, the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company or the sale or issuance of common stock below the book or market value price of such stock. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital or to facilitate corporate acquisitions.


One of the effects of the existence of un-issued and unreserved common stock may be to enable our Board of Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, which issuance could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of our board by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of our management and possibly deprive the stockholders of opportunities to sell their shares of our common stock at prices higher than prevailing market prices.


Delaware Anti-Takeover Law

 

We will be subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. This section prohibits, subject to exceptions, publicly-traded Delaware corporations from engaging in a business combination, which includes a merger or sale of more than 10% of the corporation's assets, with any interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is generally defined as a person who, with its affiliates and associates, owns or, within three years before the time of determination of interested stockholder status, owned 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting securities. This prohibition does not apply if: the transaction is approved by the Board of Directors before the time the interested stockholder attained that status; upon the closing of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interest stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the start of the transaction; or at or after the time the stockholder became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.


A Delaware corporation may opt out of this provision with an express provision in its original certificate of incorporation or an express provision in its certificate of incorporation or bylaws resulting from an amendment approved by at least a majority of the outstanding voting shares. However, we have not opted out of this provision. This provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law could prohibit or delay a merger or other takeover or change-in-control attempts and may discourage attempts to acquire us.




- 22 -




Shareholder Matters

 

Certain provisions of Delaware law create rights that might be deemed material to our shareholders. Other provisions might delay or make more difficult acquisitions of our stock or changes in our control or might also have the effect of preventing changes in our management or might make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that some of our shareholders may believe to be in their best interests.

 

Dissenters' Rights

 

Among the rights granted under Delaware law which might be considered as material is the right for shareholders to dissent from certain corporate actions and obtain payment for their shares (see Delaware Revised Statutes ("DRS") 92A.380-390). This right is subject to exceptions, summarized below, and arises in the event of mergers or plans of exchange. This right normally applies if shareholder approval of the corporate action is required either by Delaware law or by the terms of the articles of incorporation.

 

A shareholder does not have the right to dissent with respect to any plan of merger or exchange, if the shares held by the shareholder are part of a class of shares which are:

 

*

listed on a national securities exchange,

 

*

included in the national market system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, or

 

*

held of record by not less than 2,000 holders.

 

This exception notwithstanding, a shareholder will still have a right of dissent if it is provided for in the articles of incorporation (our certificate of incorporation does not so provide) or if the shareholders are required under the plan of merger or exchange to accept anything but cash or owner's interests, or a combination of the two, in the surviving or acquiring entity, or in any other entity falling in any of the three categories described above in this paragraph.

 

Inspection Rights

 

Delaware law also specifies that shareholders are to have the right to inspect company records. This right extends to any person who has been a shareholder of record for at least six months immediately preceding his demand. It also extends to any person holding, or authorized in writing by the holders of, at least 5% of our outstanding shares. Shareholders having this right are to be granted inspection rights upon five days' written notice. The records covered by this right include official copies of: the articles of incorporation, and all amendments thereto, bylaws and all amendments thereto; and a stock ledger or a duplicate stock ledger, revised annually, containing the names, alphabetically arranged, of all persons who are stockholders of the corporation, showing their places of residence, if known, and the number of shares held by them, respectively.


In lieu of the stock ledger or duplicate stock ledger, Delaware law provides that the corporation may keep a statement setting out the name of the custodian of the stock ledger or duplicate stock ledger, and the present and complete post office address, including street and number, if any, where the stock ledger or duplicate stock ledger specified in this section is kept.


Transfer Agent


The transfer agent for our common stock is Island Stock Transfer. Its telephone number is 727-289-0010.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in “Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition.”


OVERVIEW

 

Revenue Recognition

 



- 23 -




The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its sole customer and any potential future customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customer or future customer; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.  The Company receives a fee for each document indexed on a charge per page basis, or a minimum base fee of $252 (the “Base Fee”) for each 24 hour period except holidays and weekends if a certain number of indexed pages are not met.


The Company outsources all of its services to an unrelated third party and follows paragraph 605-45-45-4 through 14 (formerly paragraphs 7 through 14 of EITF 99-19) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition to report revenue gross as a principal for its services since the Company (1) acts as principal contractor in the transaction, (2) takes title to the products and services, (3) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and (4) does not act as an agent or broker (including performing services, in substance, as an agent or broker) with compensation on a commission or fee basis on its document indexing services.  The management of the Company determined that the Company should report revenue based on the gross amount billed to a customer when considering each of the following eight (8) indicators of gross revenue reporting listed in ASC 605-45-45-4 through 605-45-45-14 as specified (1) The entity is the primary obligor in the arrangement — The Company signed a service agreement with its customer and represented in writing that the Company is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the product(s) or service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer; (2) The entity has general inventory risk (before customer order is placed or upon customer return) — Not applicable; (3) The entity has latitude in establishing price — The Company has reasonable latitude, within economic constraints, to establish the exchange price with a customer for the product or service; (4) The entity changes the product or performs part of the service — Not applicable; (5) The entity has discretion in supplier selection — The Company has multiple suppliers for the services ordered by a customer and discretion to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer; (6) The entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications — The Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, or specifications of the product(s) or service(s) ordered by the customer; (7) The entity has physical loss inventory risk — after customer order or during shipping — Not applicable; and (8) The entity has credit risk — The Company is responsible for collecting the sales price from its customer but must pay the amount owed to its supplier after the supplier performs, regardless of whether the sales price is fully collected


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 .

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain statement of operations data:


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2010

For the Fiscal Year ended

March 31, 2009

Net  Revenues:

$              208,461  

$                241,212 

Cost of Services:

$              191,151  

$                218,321 

Gross Profit:

$                17,310  

$                  22,891 

Operating Expenses:

$                38,533  

$                  35,416 

Loss before income tax:

$               (21,223)

$               (12,525)

Income tax expense:

$                  1,600  

$                          - 

Net Loss: :

$               (22,823)

$               (12,525)

Net Loss Per Common Share :

$                    (0.00)

$                    (0.00)


 Segment information


We report information about operating segments, as well as disclosures about our services, geographic areas, and sole major customer .  Operating segments are defined as revenue-producing components of the enterprise, which are generally used internally for evaluating segment performance.


Our revenue base is derived from providing a web based section of electronic medical claims processing. We have concluded that we have only one reportable segment.



- 24 -





OPERATIONS


Net Revenues


A summary of revenue generated for the fiscal years ending March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:


 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

 

2010

2009

Net Revenues

$208,461

$241,212


Total revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 was $208,461 compared to $241,212 for the year ended March 31, 2009 .   This represents a decrease of $32,751 from that of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 , or 86.4% . This decrease reflects a decrease in the number of pages processed for our sole customer. We do not expect any revenue increase or further decrease over the 2011 fiscal year period.


Our periodic revenues directly correlate to the number of pages processed within that period.  Although we expect to generate revenue in the future from subscription fees, billing solution fees, support fees, customization , and consulting fees, as discussed in the Business Services section and the Revenue Generation section on page 29 of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation, our primary and sole revenue source during these periods has been through indexing fees, where we bill a per page processing fee to our sole customer .  This service is currently provided by an independent third-party subcontractor.  


In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, we processed approximately 2,080,000  pages, as compared to processing approximately 2,410,000 pages for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.  This is a decrease of about 13.7% of pages processed between the two periods.  We experienced a decrease during this time, but we do not expect a decrease from fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 to fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. We believe we have achieved maximum revenue generation from our sole customer and expect it to continue on an even trend and not decrease or increase substantially , unless certain matters as discussed in the risk factors section with regards to new government regulations or industry methodology changes were to be enacted and make our services unnecessary for our customer .  If we were to lose this customer’s business, our revenue stream would be greatly affected and decrease completely until we found other customers or generated income elsewhere.   We are not aware of any factors that may mitigate an increase or decrease in the future.


In the fourth quarter of the year ended March 31, 2009, 38% of the annual revenues were earned, 38% of the costs of services were incurred, and approximately 60% of our annual operating expenses were incurred.  This period represented a disproportionally large percentage of our revenues, costs, and expenses.  Revenue increase was due to a sudden increased volume of services provided during this period and we do not expect that trend to continue in future similar periods.  Costs of service during this time directly correlated to our revenues because of the way we earn revenues from services being dependent upon our third party vendor.  We do not expect that to happen in the corresponding future periods.  Operating expenses went up substantially during this period as a result of approximately $20,000 in professional fees incurred.  We did not expect professional fees to similarly increase in future corresponding periods.


For the fourth quarter of the year ended March 31, 2010, only 16.5% of the annual revenues were earned, while 16.4% of the annual costs of services were incurred and 37.9% of our annual operating expenses were incurred.  Revenues and costs of services were not disproportionately high during this period as seen in the previous year.  Operating expenses increased during this period due to an approximately $9,000 increase in professional fees and an approximately $6,000 increase in advertising and promotion, but we do not expect to see this trend in the future.


Cost of Services 


 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

 

2010

2009

Cost of Services

$191,151

$218,321

% of Revenue

91.7%

90.5%




- 25 -




Our cost of services is comprised solely of the cost of the third party vendor that provides all of the services to our sole customer on a subcontractor basis.  Total cost of services for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 was $191,151 compared to $218,321 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 .  This represents a decrease of $27,170 from that of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 , or 12.4% . This decrease reflects a decrease in the number of pages and documents processed for our sole customer.  We expect the costs of services to remain the same in the 2011 fiscal year as in the previous fiscal year, we are not aware of any factors that may mitigate an increase or decrease in the future.


Gross Profit



 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

 

2010


2009


  Gross Profit

$17,310

$22,891

  % of Revenue

8.3%

9.5%

 

Gross profit decreased by $5,581 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. The decrease was due to an overall higher cost of services per page and document processed , making the ratio of costs of services over net revenues higher in 2010. The gross margins were 8.3% for the fiscal year ended March, 31, 2010, and 9.5% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of 1.2%.  We expect the gross profits to remain the same in the 2011 fiscal year as in the previous year.  We are not aware of any factors that may mitigate an increase or decrease in the future.


Operating Expenses


 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

 

2010

2009

  Operating Expenses

$38,533

$35,416

  % of Revenue

18.5%

14.7%


Operating expenses for the period ended March 31, 2010 were $38,533 and $35,416 for the period ended March 31, 2009.   This increase was due to increasing professional costs such as accounting fees related to the preparation of our private placement documents and Registration Statement on Form S-1, auditing fees, attorney fees related to the preparation of offering documents and the Registration Statement on Form S-1, as well as transfer agent fees that were not present in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, and increased advertising and Promotion expenses .  These increases were due to increased activity and S-1 Registration Statement costs as illustrated by the chart below.  We had no officer compensation expenses in the fiscal year ended march 31, 2010, and we had $12,000 in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009.   We expect the operating expenses to remain the same in the 2011 fiscal year.



 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

EXPENSES

2010

2009

Professional Fees

$23,410

$19,700

Advertising and Promotion

$  6,063

$  1,714

General and Administrative

$  9,060

$  2,002

Officers Compensation

$         -

$12,000



 

Fiscal Year Ended

March 31,

INCOME TAXES

2010

2009

Income Taxes

$  1,600

$         0




- 26 -




We incurred an aggregate of $23,410 and $19,700 in professional fees related to our S-1 filing in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively .


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Since our inception, we have financed our operations through loans , equity sales , and funds generated by our business.  From time to time, our major stockholders and chief executive officer advance funding to the Company for our working capital purpose. As of March 31, 2010 advances from stockholders totaled $401 .  The advances from the major stockholders and chief executive officer bear no interest and have no formal repayment terms. However, our major stockholders and chief executive officer have no contractual obligations to fund our operations and no assurance can be given that future funding to be available through advances or loans from or the sale of equity to from our major stockholders and chief executive officer.  They have no contractual obligations to fund our operations.  As of March 31, 2010 , we had $29,591 in cash. We believe that cash on hand may not be adequate to satisfy our ongoing working capital needs past December 2010 . During Fiscal Year 20 10 , our primary objectives in managing liquidity and cash flows will be to ensure financial flexibility to keep the Company operating and support growth.


Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities amounted to $(14,553) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $ 15,100 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 .   This change is primarily due to increases in stock compensation and accounts payable, and decreases by accrued expenses and an increase in accounts receivable.  We have accrued $ 23,410 in professional fees in connection with the filing of this registration statement.  On March 8, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of its common stock to its SEC attorney for past legal services rendered, valued at $10,000 (the estimated fair value on the date of grant).


Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities.  None.


Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $32,633 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $(4,953) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 .   The change in financing activity is the result of $32,000 from proceeds from the private placement of common stock.  Also, the stockholders advancing funds to us for the period ending March 31, 2008 and in the subsequent year were paid down.



Given our recent rate of negative cash flow in our operations, which is approximately $2,000 per month, as well as the likelihood that our cash burn rate will increase once we become a reporting company due to increased accounting, audit, attorney, and EDGAR professional fees of approximately $5,000 per quarter , we believe that unless gross profits increase we do not have sufficient capital to carry on operations past December of 2010, but we plan to raise additional capital in a Regulation D Rule 505 exemption private placement equity offering six months after the effective date of this prospectus, or if current proposed regulations are adopted, three months from the date of this prospectus, to secure the funds needed to finance our plan of operation for 2011 and overcome the uncertainty of our ability to continue as a going concern. This $50,000 raise would allow us to continue for approximately 12 months past December 2010 at the current burn rate.   However, this is a forward-looking statement, and there may be changes that could consume available resources before such time.   Our contingency plan if the funds cannot be raised is to; 1) have the company seek a bank credit line; 2) receive loans from our officers; 3) private equity investments or debt financing from individuals or entities.   Our long term capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the eventual reporting company costs and public relations fees, among others.  If we are unable to raise additional capital or generate sufficient revenue we will have to curtail or cease our operations.


Management plans to also seek additional capital to fund operations, growth, and expansion through additional equity financing, debt financing, or credit facilities. We have had early stage discussions with investors about potential investment in our firm at a future date. No assurance can be made that such financing would be available on acceptable terms, and if available, it may take either the form of debt or equity. In either case, the financing could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our shareholders.


Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain financing and upon our ability to achieve future profitable operations from the development of our business model.  Our independent registered public accounting firm (our auditors) issued its audit report including an explanatory paragraph as to an uncertainty with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.  If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose their investment.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements




- 27 -




None


Forward-Looking Statements

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors," that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements


While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

 

INFLATION

 

Inflation can be expected to have an impact on our operating costs. A prolonged period of inflation could cause interest rates, wages and other costs to increase which would adversely affect our results of operations unless event planning rates could be increased correspondingly. However, the effect of inflation has been minimal over the past two years.


FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Our future operating results and financial condition are dependent on our ability to successfully provide our only current service generating revenue, electronic document indexing, but our indexing revenue can be supplemented or replaced with revenue from other services we are capable of providing, such as medical claims processing and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry. Inherent in this process are a number of factors that we must successfully manage in order to achieve favorable future operating results and financial condition. Potential risks and uncertainties that could affect future operating results and financial condition include, without limitation, the factors discussed below.

 

OUR BUSINESS


iBOS Inc. (“iBOS”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) was initially formed as a California Corporation in April 2006 and became and Delaware Corporation in March 2009.


We currently can perform and provide electronic document indexing, a web-based comprehensive selection of electronic medical claims processing, and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry. Our current customer, with whom we have entered into an open-ended non-expiring but terminable service agreement, only utilizes document indexing, but we have the ability to perform other services that can help doctors, clinics, surgical or hospital based practices, and other healthcare providers and their vendors significantly improve daily insurance claims transaction administration and management as follows:

 

 

Increase office efficiencies and lower collection costs;

 

Reduce administrative workload;

 

Improve claims accuracy before submission to, and increase acceptance by, third party payers;

 

Reduce payment cycle time;

 

Improve cash flow management;

 

Increase revenue control;

 

Improve information management, financial security and provider regulatory compliance;

 

‘‘End-to-end’’ solution for claims management; and

 

Fully automate the revenue process by the use of electronic claims and remittance advice, and payment reconciliation

 



- 28 -




iBOS has been in operations since April, 2006.  Since our inception, the appropriate people, repeatable business processes, and technology have been put in place with a goal to ensure financial stability and earnings growth.  Our current mission is to provide best-of-industry electronic indexing of paper medical records into a purchased EHR (Electronic health record) product for medical groups and hospitals.  Our past and present revenues have been generated solely by our electronic indexing service .  We are capable of providing, and plan to provide, our additional services in the future when our sole customer or prospective future customers are ready and willing to hire us for these additional services.  We presently use a third party vendor that is based in Southern California to perform work for us, the exact name of said vendor is confidential to protect our competitive interest,  This vendor provide s our electronic indexing service, however we plan to bring that work in-house when we have necessary funds to reasonably do so.  When a medical group and/or hospital purchases the EHR product all of its present and future medical information is added to the patient health record within our system to streamline patient care, reduce costs and decrease errors in prescriptions given.  Standard practice requires that medical groups and/or hospitals update and retain these electronic charts and records going back 5-7 years depending on the age and medical history of the patient.


BUSINESS SERVICES


Our iBOS solutions and services improve a healthcare provider’s ability to electronically index documents, process and manage claims, and streamline office workflow. The burden of medical records in a physician practice is extreme. Overcrowded offices lead to inaccessible charts; whether misplaced, lost, or in use by another staff member. Physician practices continue to seek a solution to reduce or eliminate the increasing volumes of paper within their organizations. The optimal product would eliminate the issues of overcrowded office space and storage facilities as well as the problems associated with paper medical records like lost or misplaced patient charts. Physicians demand a flexible, easy-to-use solution, yet one capable of standardization for consistency and compliance. In short, physician practices need a solution that increases staff efficiency, productivity, and patient satisfaction, all while reducing operational costs.  Following are the services provided by iBOS to meet these needs.

 

Our iBOS billing solution provides value added for improved efficiencies. As part of our solution, the billing platform offers collections and appeals services, as well as solutions for the collection of old existing medical claim submissions. Our billing solution is designed to operate in an integrated fashion with the other iBOS solutions and services. There are fewer manual and paper functions to be performed in the combined claims management processing/billing solutions process. This can reduce a healthcare provider’s claims related operations. Although we are only currently providing document indexing to our sole customer, the range of services we can provide include:


Document Indexing: electronic indexing of paper medical records to allow for easy access of patient information with a touch of a button

Billing: focused on managing and optimizing the revenue cycle for healthcare providers

Collections: specialized in collection of small balance accounts, managed care verification, payments and profit line analysis for hospitals

Accounting: seamless extension for accounting departments enabling operations to be more efficient

Consulting: information for best practices on a multitude of practice issues ranging from new practice start-ups to cost containment on overhead expenses

Record Management: Electronic Medical Record (“EMR”) Services to provide a paperless back-office


Our past and present revenues have been generated solely by our electronic document indexing service, which is currently provided by a third party subcontractor.  We plan to bring this service in house once sufficient capital is raised to purchase the required software and computer equipment.  We can perform, and plan to provide , our additional services in the future and to take on more customers.   We are capable of providing, and plan to provide, our additional services in the future when our sole customer or prospective future customers are ready and willing to hire us for these additional services.   When our company’s capital resources are sufficient to hire additional employees, we shall expand accordingly to increase business operations and revenues.


Consulting Services


Although we provide solutions that do not require our customer or prospective customers to purchase new hardware or software, healthcare providers can take advantage of customized and premium enhancements through our third party associates, including enhanced billing and collection services. Consulting services are also available to enhance healthcare provider practices or business operations.


Revenue Generation




- 29 -




Current Business


 Backscanning and Electronic Indexing Fees.   Customers would be charged a per page fee to scan paper medical records, and electronically index the documents into the appropriate sections of electronic health records , with a minimum daily fee of $252 for each 24 hour period except holidays and weekends if a certain number of indexed pages are not met.


Future Business


We plan to provide services and generate revenues from the following:


Examples of other services we can perform and plan to earn revenue from in the future as we expand include the following:


Subscription Fees:  Healthcare providers are typically charged a percentage of the value of every claim that we process for administration of claims, including claims remittances through various accounts .

 

Billing Solution Fees:  Providers are typically charged a percentage of the value of every claim that is collected by our service for collections, appeals and patient letter billing services; occasionally, other payment arrangements are made.

 

Support Fees:  Healthcare providers and financial institutions are typically charged a one-time setup and training fee.


Customization and Consulting Fees:   Our sole customer or future customers would be charged for any non-standard customer support, consulting and any customization, such as for electronic interfaces from the healthcare provider’s existing legacy management system to our systems.


MARKET FOR OUR SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES

 

Healthcare providers face serious challenges in processing claims submitted to third party payers, as well as in getting correct and prompt payment from payers. Claims must be prepared by gathering data from the front office to the back, with processing often occurring at different times and locations for each procedure. Many healthcare providers’ current billing systems require the performance of different steps by different third party sources. Claims can move among the healthcare provider’s internal staff, through a practice management system and across multiple offices, to billing, editing engines, clearinghouse, contract management, banking and other resources.

 

The need for security and privacy of patient information requires complex data management. Claims may be processed on the payer end through out-of-network claims administrators, re-pricing organizations, third party administrators, managed care organizations, independent physician associations, and preferred provider organizations. Further, healthcare providers face continuing pressure from payers to accept lower fees on changing definitions of covered claims, with variations in customary remittance values. At the same time, payers require precise documentation and justification for covered claims.

 

Claims may be rejected for a variety of reasons including medical necessity, eligibility, coding errors, tardiness, deductibles, referrals, pre-certifications and improper documentation. Lack of access to basic, but important, claim information and the lack of real-time data and feedback may waste office hours and affect reimbursement. Repetitive paperwork and phone conversations dealing with disputes, errors and rejections may be typical occurrences in the provider’s office. Additionally, the failure, or inability, to match claims against existing contracts, when added to these other factors, can make it extremely difficult to determine how much and when the healthcare provider will be paid.

 

Management of the status of claims and valuation, remittance and validation of proper payment and disbursement requires detailed real time information. If claims are not being compared to contracts in real time, and if robust tracking and auditing mechanisms are not in place, then the availability and transparency of data cannot be optimized. As a result, the healthcare provider’s financial managers may only estimate results, with varying degrees of volatility, cash flow predictability and accuracy. Moreover, they may miss, ignore or abandon incorrect or partial payments.




- 30 -




The challenges faced in connection with claims management can result in lost revenue, volatile and unsatisfactory cash flow, inaccurate reporting, inefficient management of operations and attendant increases in office workload, expenses and costs of borrowing. Healthcare providers have used a patchwork of internal and third party resources to address these problems. For example, billing and practice management systems attempt to address the claims processing market predominantly by selling proprietary hardware and software products (and maintenance and upgrades or customization), with various features and benefits. They may or may not generate Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (‘‘HIPAA’’) compliant electronic forms from their systems, and if they do, such forms may be mapped and formatted in different ways, leading to potential errors and problems with acceptance and payment. Ultimately, they offer tools that require office staff and/or external resources to perform critical claims management functions.


Claims-related management challenges have also greatly impacted the borrowing abilities of healthcare providers. Healthcare providers typically borrow by factoring their receivables arising out of non-Medicare insurance claims, personally guarantying a loan with their own credit or taking an expensive asset-based loan against claims receivables at a significant discount with significant required reserves. Lenders typically have not been able to offer short term, revolving credit lines on receivables arising out of insurance claims, because of the existing difficulty in qualifying them as low risk, high quality, and commoditized collateral. Lenders remain concerned about safely and accurately assessing either the true value or the payment risk associated with any given claim or group of claims. Any solution to this problem is further complicated by the lender’s resistance to risking the purchase of an inadequate or expensive customized solution to serve this market.

 

We believe our integrated suite of solutions and services offer healthcare providers and their lenders comprehensive, cost efficient and superior claims processing and management solutions over the internet. Our system can become a healthcare provider’s single source platform for integrating claims management and funding functions. Our solutions and services quickly improve claims accuracy, valuation and remittance success, enable outsourced payer contract management, facilitate prompt financing of claims, and produce superior cash and information management. Our technology based services also offer benefits to small and medium healthcare provider practices with limited resources and staff, allowing them to perform or facilitate the performance of tasks and functions previously only available to much larger practices capable of purchasing more sophisticated and expensive tools and hiring more people to use them. It also allows many financial institutions to lend to healthcare providers on qualified receivables, at risk and cost factors not previously available. With our products and services, healthcare providers of a variety of specialties and sizes have the ability to leverage an ‘‘end-to-end’’ claims management solution.

 

By combining automated batched and real time functionality into a proprietary ‘‘end to end’’ claims management, we believe that our solutions and services offer superior value and competitive advantages, including the following:

 

 

Reduced Workload

 

 

‘‘Pay As You Go”


 

Increased Efficiency/Lower Costs

 

 

Superior Information Management

 

 

Web-based, User Friendly Technology

 

 

Integrated Functions

 

 

Features Appeal to Lenders

 

 

Contract management is critical to maximizing reimbursement

 

 

Superior Claims Engine

 

 

Module Independence



INDUSTRY ANALYSIS


Industry Size:

 



- 31 -




Healthcare has been called the single largest U.S. industry. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), it is expected to reach $3.0 trillion plus over the next three years. The National healthcare expenditure projections are produced annually by the Office of the Actuary at the CMS. They are based on historical national health expenditures and a model framework that incorporates actuarial, econometric and judgmental factors. National health expenditures are forecast to reach $3.3 trillion by 2012, growing at a mean annual rate of 7.3%. During this period, health spending is expected to grow 2.5% per year faster than nominal gross domestic product (GDP), so that by 2012 it will constitute approximately 18.8% of GDP compared to its 2000 level of 13.8%. (statistics available free of charge on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website located at www.cmr.hhs.gov)

[ibosforms1a3_080610apg005.jpg]

Market Needs

 

Technology has provided increased efficiency, especially in the delivery of healthcare. However, one of the most troubled areas is the medical claims billing, processing, and payment area. This segment continues to suffer errors and inefficiencies, as well as large amounts of paper transactions and piecemeal solutions, leaving a significant claims management burden in the provider’s back office.

 

Claims processing is a chief contributor, since the vast majority of claim transactions require a large amount of manual intervention. Healthcare is unlike many other businesses in that the value of the service is determined retrospectively. This negative aspect of the business becomes more evident and pronounced when coupled with Workers Compensation and Personal Injury medical services, which have additional administrative hurdles to overcome to receive payment. These facts, combined with a paper and manual work dependent system, result in significant inefficiencies in the claims filing, payment and reconciliation process. Our system can reduce these inefficiencies by automating and replacing many manual labor intensive paper-ridden processes with fully electronic processes, which increase the information available to manage and collect outstanding claims.


Payers realize the importance of moving claim transactions to electronic media through the internet. From the payers’ perspective, administrative costs could be substantially lowered if claims were submitted electronically and were accurate enough to be adjudicated by a computer system without any requirement for manual intervention and/or resubmission. Payers could also save administrative costs by implementing electronic payment systems, including electronic explanation of payments.


HIPAA requires payers to move to electronic claim transactions and establish format standards. As HIPAA compliance is now enforceable by fines, the pressure for secure and compliant solutions has become greater than ever.


HIPAA has compelled health plans, clearing houses and other healthcare providers to move to a uniform electronic format. Specifically, HIPAA requires standard electronic formats for the following transactions:


 

Healthcare claims or equivalent encounter information;

 

Healthcare payment and remittance advice;

 

Coordination of benefits when separate plans have differing payment responsibilities;

 

Health claims status when providers inquire about claims they have submitted;

 

Plan enrollment and dis-enrollment;

 

Health plan eligibility;

 

Health plan premium payments;

 

Referral certifications and authorizations;



- 32 -







 

First reports of injuries or illnesses;

 

Health claims attachments used to justify services; and

 

Other transactions the federal government may specify in the future.


We view this highly inefficient market as our primary opportunity. Our solutions and services can significantly decrease the cost of claims processing for both providers and payers, and can also create a new asset class consisting of claims, against which financial institutions can lend.


MARKET STRATEGY


We plan to sell our services to physician and clinical service group practices, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes and certain related practice vendors by using internal and external resources. Internal resources will consist mainly of specialized sales executives with industry knowledge and/or a portfolio of contacts.


Our marketing is based on prioritizing potential subscribers by size, location and density, need for our products and services and distribution opportunities. Accordingly, we expect to focus our marketing efforts in geographic areas that contain high concentrations of prospective customers, such as California. Since part of our business involves management and review of healthcare provider contracts with payers, and their contracts tend to be similar by region, we believe that a concentration of marketing efforts in areas with high concentrations of prospective customers will also reduce costs (for example, by reducing processing of repetitive contract pricing and increasing set-up efficiencies for field reps) as well as increasing revenues.


Media Marketing


Our advertising strategy prioritizes spending to facilitate sales goals. We expect to utilize internal and external resources to develop advertising mediums to open the appropriate sales opportunities, which may include the following:

 

Business-to-business advertising;

 

Search engine and Web-site advertising;

 

Direct marketing;

 

Magazine/trade journal advertising;

 

Trade-show advertising; and

 

Media Advertising (television, radio, billboards, Internet, etc.).


Sales Methods

 

Sales will be generated by conventional methods, which may include direct sales calls, trade shows, seminars, dinners, Webcasts and direct mail. Lead generation will include internet presence and third party referral sources.


Mr. James Villalobos is currently our Vice President of Sales and Marketing.  Mr. Villalobos’ duties include managing our current customer as well as soliciting potential new customers.  As we expand and gain additional customers outside of our sole current customer, James will be responsible for building and managing a sales team to go through a national expansion of iBOS services to medical groups and hospitals country wide.


COMPETITION

 

The market for medical claims-related products and services is generally highly competitive and subject to constant change as a result of new product introductions, technological developments and market activities of industry participants. We anticipate competition from a number of public and private companies involved in the business of medical claims transaction processing and solutions, including editing engines, claims management and/or practice management systems, clearinghouses, and medical receivable funding companies. We are also aware that other companies offer products and services with some or many features similar to those that we are capable of providing and have proven track records across a substantial customer base.




- 33 -




We initially plan to compete on price and service, meaning we will offer competitive prices to keep our sole current customer enrolled with us and will offer lower service prices to potential future customers than they might find elsewhere.  We feel potential customers in our industry base a lot of their decision on which company to hire on the cost of services.  Therefore we feel that if we can beat the prices quoted by competing companies and save potential customers 5-10% in costs, we will have a competitive edge when marketing our services to potential new customers and keeping our current customer using our services.  Because we are a boutique company, we have a small office and work very closely with our sole customer and will work closely with any additional future customers.  By keeping our overhead low, which is accomplished in part by free office space, we can keep our service costs low as well.  We feel our customer service is of a higher caliber than what other larger firms offer because we have minimal layers of intra-business departments and when we have one key person communicating business needs with our customer there is no communication loss or confusion that might arise like in a larger firm that might use several different people on each customer .  We also are available to speak with our sole customer and any additional future customers after normal business hours end and that is better customer service than many other competitors offer.


PRINCIPAL CUSTOMER


One (1) customer accounted for all of total sales for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  The sole customer is a growing non-profit, community based health care delivery network in Southern California that includes multiple hospitals and thousands of affiliated physicians.  A reduction in sales from or loss of such customer would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.  We are not aware of any negative trends, impeding business issue, or uncertainties related to their business that would adversely impact us.


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT


None.


EMPLOYEES


We currently have no employees, however Mr. Danavar, Mr. Sharma, and Mr. Villalobos perform employee like services for our company on a part time basis.  Mr. Danavar and the other officers work approximately 10 hours each per week for the benefit of iBOS.  Employee-like services provided by the officers and directors of iBOS are not compensated at this time and no employee contracts with them have been entered into.  These individuals have other employment and responsibilities outside of iBOS.  We plan to expand our operations and to hire employees in the future when economically feasible.


OUR OFFICES


Free office space from American Commercial Lighting, Inc.


American Commercial Lighting, Inc. is partially owned by our officer Ravi Sharma’s father.  American Commercial Lighting, Inc. holds a formal lease to the premises, providing office space to us at no cost.   No formal lease exists between our Company and American Commercial Lighting, Inc.  The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize rent expense in its financial statements.  The office space provides office equipment and services needed to operate our business, including furniture, phones, internet connection, supplies, and printer use.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash annual remuneration of our officers as a group during our last two fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 :


Name of individual

or identity of group

Capacities in which

remuneration

was received

Year

Salary

Bonus

Stock Awards

All Other Compensation

Aggregate remuneration

Deepak Danavar

President and CEO

2010

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

2009

$4,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

Ravi Sharma

CFO and Secretary

2010

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

2009

$4,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

James Villalobos

Vice President of Sales and Marketing

2010

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

2009

$4,000

$0

$0

$0

$0



- 34 -








We do not intend to pay compensation to our officers in the future until such time as our capital resources are sufficient in the judgment of our Board of Directors.


No compensation to Directors.


No director has received any cash or other compensation for serving as a director and we do not plan to pay any cash or other compensation to any person for serving as a director.


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS, AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS


On March 7, 2009, Deepak Danavar, our President, CEO, and Chairman, Ravi Sharma, our CFO, Secretary, and a director, and James Villalobos, our VP Sales and Marketing and a director, were issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares (3,000,000 each) of our common stock upon formation of the Company in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares in the Company’s predecessor, Ibos, Inc., a California S corporation.  No cash consideration was paid.  No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation.  Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $.0001 par value and additional paid-in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($900).


On March 8, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock to our counsel and a promoter, Frank J. Hariton, for past legal services rendered, valued at $10,000 (the estimated fair value of legal services rendered on the date of grant).  Mr. Hariton has also been paid an aggregate of $5,000 for his counsel services as of this date.


The advances from stockholders bear no interest and have no formal repayment terms.  Advances from stockholders at March 31, 2008 were $15,451.  On May 5, 2008, August 11, 2008, December 3, 2008, and March 18, 2009, the Company repaid $500, $5,000, $500 and $304 of the advances, respectively.  On November 6, 2008 and March 23, 2009, stockholders advanced $1,000 and $351 to the Company, respectively.


On April 28, 2009, the Company repaid $200 of the advances. On December 11, 2009 and March 25, 2010, stockholders advanced $432 and $401 to the Company, respectively. On March 31, 2010, stockholders forgave $10,730 of advances and contributed the same to capital.


PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS


The promoters of our company were Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, James Villalobos, and Frank J. Hariton.  Our promoters received nothing of value in return for being a promoter.  Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, and James Villalobos were issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares (3,000,000 each) of our common stock upon formation of the Company in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares in the Company’s predecessor, Ibos, Inc., a California S corporation.  No cash consideration was paid.  No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation.  On March 8, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock to our counsel and a promoter, Frank J. Hariton, for past legal services rendered, valued at $10,000 (the estimated fair value of legal services rendered on the date of grant).


LEGAL MATTERS


The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Frank J. Hariton, Esq., 1065 Dobbs Ferry Road, White Plains, New York 10607. Frank J. Hariton, Esq. owns 200,000 shares of our common stock.


EXPERTS


The financial statements of iBOS Inc. as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 included in this prospectus have been audited by Li & Company, PC, an independent registered public accounting firm, and have been so included in reliance upon the report of Li & Company, PC, given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION


We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1, including exhibits, schedules and amendments, under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all the information included in the registration statement. For further information about us and the shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering, please refer to this registration statement.




- 35 -




As of the date of this prospectus, we became subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, we will file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N. E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You should call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings will also be available to the public at the SEC's web site at "http:/www.sec.gov."


iBOS Inc.

4879 E. Palma Ave., #201

Anaheim, CA 92807

714-292-1070

www.ibos.com






- 36 -




iBOS, Inc.


March 31, 2010 and 2009


Index to Financial Statements




Contents                                                                                                                                                   Page(s)


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

38


Balance Sheets

39


Statements of Operations

40


Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

41


Statements of Cash Flows

42


Notes to the Financial Statements

43-51





- 37 -




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

IBOS, Inc.

Anaheim, California


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of IBOS, Inc. (“IBOS” or the “Company”) as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.   


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit and a net loss from operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 3.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




/s/Li & Company, PC

Li & Company, PC


Skillman, New Jersey

August 6, 2010




- 38 -





IBOS, INC.

 

 BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2010

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash

 

 

29,591 

 

 

11,511 

 

 Accounts receivable

 

 

23,861 

 

 

 

64,290 

 

 Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

 

 

614 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Current Assets

 

 

53,452 

 

 

 

76,415 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Assets

 

53,452 

 

 

76,415 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

24,639 

 

 

58,012 

 

 Accrued expenses

 

 

8,100 

 

 

 

7,500 

 

 Advances from stockholders

 

 

401 

 

 

 

10,498 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Current Liabilities

 

 

33,140 

 

 

 

76,010 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Preferred stock at $0.0001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 none issued or outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Common stock at $0.0001 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 9,520,000 and 9,200,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

952 

 

 

 

920 

 

 Additional paid-in capital

 

 

57,456 

 

 

 

14,758 

 

 Accumulated deficit

 

 

(38,096)

 

 

 

(15,273)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Stockholders' Equity

 

 

20,312 

 

 

 

405 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

 

53,452 

 

 

76,415 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.




- 39 -





IBOS, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year

 

For the Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2010

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET REVENUES

 

 

208,461 

 

241,212 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 COST OF SERVICES

 

 

 

191,151 

 

 

218,321 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 GROSS PROFIT

 

 

 

17,310 

 

 

22,891 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Advertising and promotion

 

 

 

6,063 

 

 

1,714 

 

 Professional fees

 

 

 

23,410 

 

 

19,700 

 

 Officers' compensation

 

 

 

 

 

12,000 

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

 

9,060 

 

 

2,002 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total operating expenses

 

 

 

38,533 

 

 

35,416 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

 

(21,223)

 

 

(12,525)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 INCOME TAXES

 

 

 

1,600 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS

 

 

(22,823)

 

(12,525)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - BASIC AND DILUTED:

 

 

(0.00)

 

(0.00)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Weighted common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - basic and diluted

 

 

 

9,440,000 

 

 

9,012,600 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements




- 40 -





IBOS, INC.

 

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value

 

 Additional

 

 

 

 Total

 

 

 

 

 Number of

 

 

 

 

 Paid-in

 

 Accumulated

 

 Stockholders'

 

 

 

 

 Shares

 

 Amount

 

 Capital

 

 Deficit

 

 Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balance, March 31, 2008

 

9,000,000 

 

900 

 

7,800 

 

(5,770)

 

2,930 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net income for the period from April 1, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 through March 5, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,748 

 

 

2,748 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Reclassification of undistributed earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 and income as of March 5, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 to additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,022)

 

 

3,022 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 on March 8, 2009

 

200,000 

 

 

20 

 

 

9,980 

 

 

 

 

 

10,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss for the period from March 6, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 through March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,273)

 

 

(15,273)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balance, March 31, 2009

 

9,200,000 

 

 

920 

 

 

14,758 

 

 

(15,273)

 

 

405 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 at $0.10 per share from July 6, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 through July 27, 2009

 

320,000 

 

 

32 

 

 

31,968 

 

 

 

 

 

32,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Forgiveness of debt by stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,730 

 

 

 

 

 

10,730 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22,823)

 

 

(22,823)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balance, March 31, 2010

 

9,520,000 

 

952 

 

57,456 

 

(38,096)

 

20,312 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.




- 41 -





IBOS, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year

 

For the Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2010

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

 

 

 

(22,823)

 

(12,525)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Stock based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,000 

 

 Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts receivable

 

 

 

 

40,429 

 

 

(26,777)

 

 

 Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

 

614 

 

 

199 

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

 

 

 

(33,373)

 

 

47,298 

 

 

 Accrued expenses  

 

 

 

 

600 

 

 

(3,095)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

(14,553)

 

 

15,100 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Amounts received from (paid to) stockholders

 

 

 

 

633 

 

 

(4,953)

 

 Proceeds from sale of common stock

 

 

 

 

32,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

32,633 

 

 

(4,953)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CHANGE IN CASH

 

 

 

 

18,080 

 

 

10,147 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

11,511 

 

 

1,364 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash at end of year

 

 

 

29,591 

 

11,511 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest paid

 

 

 

 

 

 Taxes paid

 

 

 

1,600 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Forgiveness of debt by stockholders

 

 

 

10,730 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for services

 

 

 

 

10,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



- 42 -




IBOS, Inc.

March 31, 2010 and 2009

Notes to the Financial Statements



NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS


IBOS, Inc. (“IBOS” or the “Company”) was incorporated as a Subchapter S corporation on April 11, 2006 under the laws of the State of California.  It was converted into a C corporation, incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 5, 2009, in a transaction in which the newly-formed corporation issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock to the former stockholders of the S corporation for all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.  All shares were held by and all shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s stockholders and President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  No cash consideration was paid.  No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation.  Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $.0001 par value and additional paid-in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($900).  The Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)), by reclassifying all of the Company’s undistributed earnings and losses to additional paid-in capital as of March 5, 2009.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared as if the Company had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.


The Company provides web-based comprehensive selection of electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of presentation


The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).


Reclassification


Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.   These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Significant estimates include the estimated useful lives of property and equipment, software copyright and technology.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Fiscal year end


The Company elected March 31 as its fiscal year ending date.


Cash equivalents


The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.


Accounts receivable


Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.  Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.




- 43 -




Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability.  Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.  To date, the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection.


The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.


Fair value of financial instruments


The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:


 

 

 

Level 1

 

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

 

 

 

Level 2

 

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

 

 

 

Level 3

 

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.


The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.


The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2010 or 2009, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.


Revenue recognition


The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  .  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customers; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.  The Company receives a fee for each document indexed on a charge per page basis, or a minimum base fee of $252 (the “Base Fee”) for each 24 hour period except holidays and weekends if a certain number of indexed pages are not met.




- 44 -




The Company outsources all of its services to an unrelated third party and follows paragraph 605-45-45-4 through 14 (formerly paragraphs 7 through 14 of EITF 99-19) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition to report revenue gross as a principal for its services since the Company (1) acts as principal contractor in the transaction, (2) takes title to the products and services, (3) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and (4) does not act as an agent or broker (including performing services, in substance, as an agent or broker) with compensation on a commission or fee basis on its document indexing services.  The management of the Company determined that the Company should report revenue based on the gross amount billed to a customer when considering each of the following eight (8) indicators of gross revenue reporting listed in ASC 605-45-45-4 through 605-45-45-14 as specified (1) The entity is the primary obligor in the arrangement — The Company signed a service agreement with its customer and represented in writing that the Company is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the product(s) or service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer; (2) The entity has general inventory risk (before customer order is placed or upon customer return) — Not applicable; (3) The entity has latitude in establishing price — The Company has reasonable latitude, within economic constraints, to establish the exchange price with a customer for the product or service; (4) The entity changes the product or performs part of the service — Not applicable; (5) The entity has discretion in supplier selection — The Company has multiple suppliers for the services ordered by a customer and discretion to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer; (6) The entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications — The Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, or specifications of the product(s) or service(s) ordered by the customer; (7) The entity has physical loss inventory risk — after customer order or during shipping — Not applicable; and (8) The entity has credit risk — The Company is responsible for collecting the sales price from its customer but must pay the amount owed to its supplier after the supplier performs, regardless of whether the sales price is fully collected


Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services


The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Section 505-50-30”).  Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.


Income taxes


The Company was a Subchapter S corporation, until March 5, 2009 during which time the Company was treated as a pass through entity for federal income tax purposes.  Under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code stockholders of an S corporation are taxed separately on their distributive share of the S corporation’s income whether or not that income is actually distributed.


Effective March 6, 2009, the Company follows paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.


The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.





- 45 -




Net income (loss) per common share


Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.   Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period.  There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding at the reporting date for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.


Commitments and contingencies


The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies.  Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.


Cash flows reporting


The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.


Subsequent events


The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.


Recently issued accounting pronouncements


On June 5, 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009.  Under the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, public companies and their independent auditors are each required to report to the public on the effectiveness of a company’s internal controls.  The smallest public companies with a public float below $75 million have been given extra time to design, implement and document these internal controls before their auditors are required to attest to the effectiveness of these controls.  This extension of time will expire beginning with the annual reports of companies with fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010.  Commencing with its annual report for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011, the Company will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting.  The internal control report must include a statement


·

Of managements responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting;


·

Of managements assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of fiscal year end; and


·

Of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.




- 46 -




Furthermore, it is required to file the auditor’s attestation report separately on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)).  Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25-14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification.  The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification.  The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary.  That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders.  It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:


1.

A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

2.

A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

3.

An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).


The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:


1.

Sales of in substance real estate.  Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

2.

Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights.  Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.


If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.  The amendments in this Update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that require new disclosures as follows:

1.

Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.

2.

Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number).


This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:

1.

Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities.



- 47 -




2.

Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.


This Update also includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers' disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (Subtopic 715-20). The conforming amendments to Subtopic 715-20 change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to the guidance in Subtopic 820-10 on how to determine appropriate classes to present fair value disclosures. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.


In February 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 as follows:


1.

An entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or(b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.

2.

An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC's requirements.

3.

The scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only. The term revised financial statements is added to the glossary of Topic 855. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.


In April 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17 “Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (Topic 605) Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition”, which provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive.


Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment made at the inception of the arrangement. The following criteria must be met for a milestone to be considered substantive. The consideration earned by achieving the milestone should:


1.

Be commensurate with either of the following:

a.

The vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

b.

The enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

2.

Relate solely to past performance

3.

Be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.


A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety. An individual milestone may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated separately to determine whether the milestone is substantive. Accordingly, an arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones.


A vendor's decision to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of the amendments in this Update is a policy election. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.


A vendor that is affected by the amendments in this Update is required to provide all of the following disclosures:


1.

A description of the overall arrangement



- 48 -




2.

A description of each milestone and related contingent consideration

3.

A determination of whether each milestone is considered substantive

4.

The factors that the entity considered in determining whether the milestone or milestones are substantive

5.

The amount of consideration recognized during the period for the milestone or milestones.


The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity's fiscal year, the entity should apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. Additionally, a vendor electing early adoption should disclose the following information at a minimum for all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption:


1.

Revenue

2.

Income before income taxes

3.

Net income

4.

Earnings per share

5.

The effect of the change for the captions presented.


A vendor may elect, but is not required, to adopt the amendments in this Update retrospectively for all prior periods.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $38,096 at March 31, 2010, a net loss from operations of $22,823 and net cash used in operations of $14,553 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, respectively.


While the Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.


The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.


NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


Advances from stockholders


Advances from stockholders at March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2010

 

 

March 31, 2009

 

Advances from stockholders

 

$

401

 

 

$

10,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

401

 

 

$

10,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The advances from stockholders bear no interest and have no formal repayment terms.  Advances from stockholders at March 31, 2008 were $15,451.  On May 5, 2008, August 11, 2008, December 3, 2008 and March 18, 2009, the Company repaid $500, $5,000, $500 and $304 of the advances, respectively.  On November 6, 2008 and March 23, 2009, stockholders advanced $1,000 and $351 to the Company, respectively.




- 49 -




On April 28, 2009, the Company repaid $200 of the advances. On December 11, 2009 and March 25, 2010, stockholders advanced $432 and $401 to the Company, respectively. On March 31, 2010, stockholders forgave $10,730 of advances and contributed the same to capital.


Free office space from American Commercial Lighting, Inc.


The Company has been provided office space at no cost by American Commercial Lighting, Inc., an entity under common control of the stockholders of the Company, which holds a formal lease to the premises.  No formal lease exists between the Company and American Commercial Lighting, Inc.  The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize rent expense in its financial statements.


NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Common stock


IBOS, Inc., a Subchapter S corporation incorporated on April 11, 2006 under the laws of the State of California, was converted into a C corporation, incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 5, 2009, in a transaction in which the newly-formed corporation issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock to the former stockholders of the S corporation for all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.  All shares were held by and all shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s President and stockholders and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  No cash consideration was paid.  No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation.  Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $.0001 par value and additional paid-in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($900).


On March 8, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock for service rendered valued at $10,000 (the estimated fair value on the date of grant).


For the period from July 6, 2009 through July 27, 2009, the Company sold 320,000 shares of its common stock to 32 individuals at $0.10 per share or $32,000 in aggregate.


Additional paid-in capital


On March 31, 2010, the stockholders and officers of Company forgave $10,730 of the advances and contributed the same to capital.


NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES


Deferred tax assets


At March 31, 2010, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of $38,096 that may be used to offset future taxable income through the fiscal year ending March 31, 2030.  No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements since the Company believes that the realization of its net deferred tax asset of approximately $12,953 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a valuation allowance of $12,953.


Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards.  The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.  The valuation allowance increased approximately $7,760 and $5,193 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and for the period from March 6, 2009 through March 31, 2009.


Components of deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2010 are as follows:


 

 

March 31, 2010

 

 

March 31, 2009

 

Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards

 

 

12,953

 

 

 

5,193

 

Less valuation allowance

 

 

(12,953

)

 

 

(5,193

)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 



- 50 -








Income taxes in the statements of operations


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:


 

 

For the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2010

 

 

For the Period from March 6, 2009 through March 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal statutory income tax rate

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

(34.0

)%

 

 

(34.0

)%

Effective income tax rate

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%


NOTE 7 – CONCENTRATIONS AND CREDIT RISK


Customers and Credit Concentrations


One (1) customer accounted for all of the sales and accounts receivable for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  A reduction in sales from or loss of such sole customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.


Vendors and Credit Concentrations


One (1) third party vendor provided all of the services to its sole customer on a subcontractor basis and accounted for all of its accounts payable for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.


NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT


The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of March 31, 2010 through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported.  The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.




- 51 -





TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

RISK FACTORS

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

USE OF PROCEEDS

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

DIVIDEND POLICY

PLAN OF DISTRUBTION

STATE SECURITIES – BLUE SKY LAWS

LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY REGULATION M

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITY HOLDERS

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

INFLATION

OUR BUSINESS

EXCUTIVE COMPENSATION

LEGAL MATTERS

EXPERTS

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation


Until _____________ (90 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.


The selling stockholders are offering and selling shares of our common stock only to those persons and in those jurisdictions where these offers and sales are permitted.


You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus, as amended and supplemented from time to time. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. The information in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date of the front cover regardless of the time of delivery or of any sale of shares. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall under any circumstances create an implication that there has not been a change in our affairs since the date hereof.


This prospectus has been prepared based on information provided by us and by other sources that we believe are reliable. This prospectus summarizes information and documents in a manner we believe to be accurate, but we refer you to the actual documents or the agreements we entered into for additional information of what we discuss in this prospectus.



- 52 -




PART II. INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS


ITEM 13.  OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

 

The following table sets forth costs and expenses payable by iBOS in connection with the sale of common shares being registered.  All amounts except the SEC filing fee are estimates.

 

SEC registration fee

  

$

8.84

 

Accounting fees and expenses

  

  

13,500.00

 

Legal fees and expenses

  

  

10,000.00

 

Miscellaneous

  

  

145.20

 

  

  

  

  

  

Total

  

23,654.04

 


The foregoing are estimates only.


ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.


Our certificate of incorporation provides to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, that our directors or officers shall not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for damages for breach of such director’s or officer’s fiduciary duty. The effect of this provision of our certificate of incorporation is to eliminate the right of us and our stockholders (through stockholders’ derivative suits on behalf of our company) to recover damages against a director or officer for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director or officer (including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior, except under certain situations defined by statute. We believe that the indemnification provisions in our certificate of incorporation are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suite or proceeding) is asserted by such director officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we willfulness in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

 ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

On March 7, 2009, we issued 9,000,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Deepak Danavar, Mr. Ravi Sharma and Mr. James Villalobos in exchange for their ownership interest in iBOS, Inc a California corporation. On March 8, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock to Frank J. Hariton, Esq. for past legal services rendered, valued at $10,000 (the estimated fair value on the date of grant). All of such transactions with our officers, directors, and affiliates were exempt from registration by reason of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. All of the shares issued in such transactions bear an appropriate restrictive legend.

During July 2009, 320,000 shares of our common stock were issued to 32 investors for $32,000 or $0.10 per share. These shares were issued in a private offering pursuant to Regulation D Rule 506 under the Act, and each of the investors therein represented in writing that such investor was an accredited investor as that term is defined in Regulation D and that he was acquiring the shares for his own account and for investment. A copy of such subscription agreement is filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. No underwriter or placement agent participated in the foregoing transactions, and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid, nor was any general solicitation or general advertising conducted. The securities bear a restrictive legend and stop transfer instructions are noted on our stock transfer records. The offering was, accordingly, exempt by reason of Section 4(6) of the Act.


ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.


The following exhibits are filed with this Registration Statement on Form S-1.




- 53 -







Exhibit No.

Description

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation**

3.2

Bylaws**

4.1

Form of Subscription Agreement**

5.1

Opinion of Frank J Hariton

23.1

Consent of Li & Company, PC

23.2

Consent of Frank J. Hariton (included in Exhibit 5.1)

** Previously filed.


UNDERTAKINGS


We hereby undertake to:

 

1.  File, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

 

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:


(i) To include any prospectus required by section 10(a) (3) of the Securities Act of 1933;


(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) (§230.424(b) of this chapter) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

 

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;


(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.


(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:


(i) Each prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) (§230.424(b)(3) of this chapter) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and




- 54 -




(ii) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) (§230.424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) of this chapter) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) (§230.415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) of this chapter) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date;


(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:


The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:


(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 (§230.424 of this chapter);


(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;


(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and


(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.


2.  Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in a successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issuer.



- 55 -





SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing on Form S-1 and authorized this amendment to this registration statement to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, in the City of Anaheim, State of California, on August 6, 2010.

iBOS INC.,

By: /s/ Deepak Danavar 

Name: Deepak Danavar 

 

Title: Chairman and CEO 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

Know all men by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all further amendments to this Registration Statement and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this amendment to this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Person

Capacity

Date

 

By: /s/ Deepak Danavar 

Deepak Danavar 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 6, 2010  

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Ravi Sharma

Ravi Sharma

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and a Director  

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

August 6, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ James Villalobos

James Villalobos

VP of Sales and Marketing

and a Director  

August 6, 2010

 



- 56 -