Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - FURMANITE CORPd75055exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FURMANITE CORPd75055exv31w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FURMANITE CORPd75055exv31w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - FURMANITE CORPd75055exv32w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the transition period from                                         to                     
Commission File Number 001-05083
 
FURMANITE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   74-1191271
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
     
2435 North Central Expressway    
Suite 700    
Richardson, Texas   75080
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(972) 699-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former
Fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þYes     o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes     o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ  Non-accelerated filer o  Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 40,752,815 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of August 2, 2010.
 
 

 


 

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
         
    Page
    Number
    3  
 
       
       
 
       
       
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    8  
 
       
    9  
 
       
    19  
 
       
    29  
 
       
    29  
 
       
       
 
       
    30  
 
       
    30  
 
       
    31  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, savings and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe” or “continue” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. The Company bases its forward-looking statements on reasonable beliefs and assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about itself and its industry. The Company cautions that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted. In addition, the Company based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. One is cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Unless otherwise required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise.

3


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)          
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 31,837     $ 36,117  
Accounts receivable, trade (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,394 and $1,617 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
    57,936       52,021  
Receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders
    1,443       1,443  
Inventories:
               
Raw materials and supplies
    17,103       18,226  
Work-in-process
    7,563       8,231  
Finished goods
    154       370  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    5,174       7,642  
 
           
Total current assets
    121,210       124,050  
Property and equipment
    66,976       66,909  
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (37,503 )     (36,741 )
 
           
Property and equipment, net
    29,473       30,168  
Goodwill
    13,148       13,148  
Deferred tax assets
    4,341       3,707  
Intangible and other assets
    3,656       3,916  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 171,828     $ 174,989  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ 139     $ 174  
Accounts payable
    16,722       17,077  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    22,135       25,599  
Income taxes payable
    1,140       1,589  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    40,136       44,439  
Long-term debt, non-current
    30,076       30,139  
Net pension liability
    11,500       12,358  
Other liabilities
    2,760       2,723  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
               
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Series B Preferred Stock, unlimited shares authorized, none outstanding
           
Common stock, no par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 40,742,815 and 40,682,815 shares issued as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    4,723       4,723  
Additional paid-in capital
    132,600       132,106  
Accumulated deficit
    (17,908 )     (21,859 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (14,046 )     (11,627 )
Treasury stock, at cost (4,008,963 shares as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009)
    (18,013 )     (18,013 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    87,356       85,330  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 171,828     $ 174,989  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Revenues
  $ 77,513     $ 69,726     $ 143,948     $ 132,758  
Costs and expenses:
                               
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    51,922       47,261       97,584       89,839  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    1,572       1,447       3,121       2,790  
Selling, general and administrative expense
    18,493       20,212       37,256       37,683  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    71,987       68,920       137,961       130,312  
 
                       
Operating income
    5,526       806       5,987       2,446  
Interest income and other income (expense), net
    (246 )     313       96       219  
Interest expense
    (241 )     (299 )     (482 )     (592 )
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    5,039       820       5,601       2,073  
Income tax expense
    (1,479 )     (589 )     (1,650 )     (962 )
 
                       
Net income
  $ 3,560     $ 231     $ 3,951     $ 1,111  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
Diluted
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares used in computing net income per common share:
                               
Basic
    36,734       36,615       36,711       36,609  
Diluted
    36,932       36,795       36,871       36,763  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and Year Ended December 31, 2009
(in thousands, except share data)
                                                                 
                                            Accumulated        
                            Additional           Other        
    Common Shares   Common   Paid-In   Accumulated   Comprehensive   Treasury    
    Issued   Treasury   Stock   Capital   Deficit   Income (Loss)   Stock   Total
     
Balances at
January 1, 2009
    40,612,815       4,008,963     $ 4,715     $ 131,418     $ (19,029 )   $ (7,774 )   $ (18,013 )   $ 91,317  
Net loss
                            (2,830 )                 (2,830 )
Stock-based compensation and stock option exercises
    70,000             8       688                         696  
Change in pension net actuarial loss and prior service credit, net of tax
                                  (8,918 )           (8,918 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  5,065             5,065  
     
Balances at December 31, 2009
    40,682,815       4,008,963     $ 4,723     $ 132,106     $ (21,859 )   $ (11,627 )   $ (18,013 )   $ 85,330  
     
Net income
                            3,951                   3,951  
Stock-based compensation and stock option exercises
    60,000                   494                         494  
Change in pension net actuarial loss and prior service credit, net of tax
                                  1,137             1,137  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  (3,556 )           (3,556 )
     
Balances at
June 30, 2010
    40,742,815       4,008,963     $ 4,723     $ 132,600     $ (17,908 )   $ (14,046 )   $ (18,013 )   $ 87,356  
     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 3,951     $ 1,111  
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    3,121       2,790  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    327       205  
Deferred income taxes
    (86 )     (145 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    494       281  
Other, net
    441       (643 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (6,850 )     5,506  
Inventories
    1,842       (1,756 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1,316       (243 )
Accounts payable
    (496 )     (2,817 )
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    (3,142 )     (2,023 )
Income taxes payable
    (352 )     2,901  
Other, net
    (47 )     (596 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    519       4,571  
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (3,451 )     (3,018 )
Acquisition of assets
    (350 )     (500 )
Proceeds from sale of assets
    195       162  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (3,606 )     (3,356 )
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Payments on debt
    (99 )     (224 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (99 )     (224 )
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    (1,094 )     (200 )
 
           
 
               
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (4,280 )     791  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    36,117       30,793  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 31,837     $ 31,584  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 400     $ 606  
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net of refunds received
  $ 1,577     $ (726 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net income
  $ 3,560     $ 231     $ 3,951     $ 1,111  
Other comprehensive income:
                               
Change in pension net actuarial loss and prior service credit,
net of tax
    205       (579 )     1,137       (530 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (1,356 )     4,720       (3,556 )     3,699  
 
                       
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
    (1,151 )     4,141       (2,419 )     3,169  
 
                       
Comprehensive income
  $ 2,409     $ 4,372     $ 1,532     $ 4,280  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
1. General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
The consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Furmanite Corporation (the “Parent Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnote disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) and accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements have been made. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the “Distribution”) to its stockholders in the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (“KSL”). On June 29, 2001, the Distribution was completed, with each shareholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL for each three shares of the Company’s common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, resulting in the distribution of 10,850,000 KSL common shares. Pursuant to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with KSL, whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or (ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSL’s common shares and the operations of KSL’s businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination, administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSL’s obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in 2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At each of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition, when realized or realizable, and earned.
Revenues are based primarily on time and materials. Substantially all projects are generally short term in nature. Revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services to customers have been rendered or products have been delivered and risk of ownership has passed to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues are recorded, net of sales tax. The Company provides limited warranties to customers, depending upon the service performed. Warranty claim costs were not material during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Revenues under long-term service contracts, generally greater than six months, are accounted for using a proportional performance method or on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes revenues on a proportional basis when a contract consists of milestones or activities that are process-related and has no other material deliverables. The Company recognizes revenues on a straight-line basis when billing terms and performance of the contract are substantially equivalent throughout the life of the contract.

9


Table of Contents

Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method. Inventory quantities on hand are reviewed regularly based on related service levels and functionality, and carrying cost is reduced to net realizable value for inventories in which their cost exceeds their utility, due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price levels or other causes. Inventories consumed or products sold are included in operating costs.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 provides more robust disclosures about the transfers between Levels 1 and 2, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements and clarifies the level of disaggregation and disclosure related to the valuation techniques and inputs used. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the Level 3 activity disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. There was not a material impact from the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends the guidance issued in ASC 855, Subsequent Events, by not requiring SEC filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events. ASU 2010-09 was effective upon issuance. There was not a material impact from the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are calculated as net income divided by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and restricted stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes issuance of the net incremental shares from stock options when dilutive. The weighted-average common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents including options to purchase shares of common stock, using the treasury stock method.
Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding and earnings per share include the following (in thousands, except per share data):
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net income
  $ 3,560     $ 231     $ 3,951     $ 1,111  
 
                               
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
    36,734       36,615       36,711       36,609  
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
    198       180       160       154  
 
                       
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
    36,932       36,795       36,871       36,763  
 
                       
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
Dilutive
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
 
                               
Stock options excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect:
    515       672       560       592  

10


Table of Contents

3. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Compensation and benefits1
  $ 12,858     $ 11,085  
Estimated potential uninsured liability claims
    1,886       3,405  
Taxes other than income
    1,601       1,393  
Value added tax payable
    1,562       1,612  
Professional, audit and legal fees
    1,050       948  
Customer deposit
    936       2,731  
Other employee related expenses
    598       634  
Rent
    559       600  
Interest
    33       42  
Payments due on purchased assets
          350  
Other2
    1,052       2,799  
 
           
 
  $ 22,135     $ 25,599  
 
           
 
1   Includes restructuring accruals of $0.6 million and $0.7 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and $0.3 million of retirement related costs as of June 30, 2010.
 
2   Includes restructuring accruals of $0.2 million as of June 30, 2010.
4. Indebtedness
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
  $ 30,000     $ 30,000  
Capital leases
    215       313  
 
           
Total long-term debt
    30,215       30,313  
Less: current portion of long-term debt
    (139 )     (174 )
 
           
Total long-term debt, non-current
  $ 30,076     $ 30,139  
 
           
On August 4, 2009, Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (“FWI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent Company, and certain foreign subsidiaries (the “designated borrowers”) of FWI entered into a new credit agreement dated July 31, 2009 with Bank of America, N.A. (the “credit agreement”). The credit agreement, which matures on January 31, 2013, provides a revolving credit facility of up to $50.0 million. A portion of the amount available under the credit agreement (not in excess of $20.0 million) is available for the issuance of letters of credit. In addition, a portion of the amount available under the credit agreement (not in excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate) is available for swing line loans to FWI. The loans outstanding under the credit agreement may not exceed $35.0 million in the aggregate to the designated borrowers.
The proceeds from the initial borrowing on the credit agreement were $35.0 million and were used to pay the amounts outstanding under the previous loan agreement, which was scheduled to mature in January 2010, at which time the previous loan agreement was terminated by the Company. Letters of credit issued from the previous loan agreement were replaced with similar letters of credit by the credit agreement. There were no material circumstances surrounding the termination and no material early termination penalties were incurred by FWI.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $30.0 million was outstanding under the credit agreement. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at variable rates (based on the prime rate, federal funds rate or Eurocurrency rate, at the option of the borrower, including a margin above such rates, and subject to an adjustment based on a calculated funded debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the credit agreement)) which were 2.6% and 2.5% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The credit

11


Table of Contents

agreement contains a commitment fee, which ranges between 0.25% to 0.30% based on the funded debt to EBITDA ratio, and was 0.25% at June 30, 2010, on the unused portion of the amount available under the credit agreement. All obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by FWI and certain of its subsidiaries under a guaranty and collateral agreement, and are secured by a first priority lien on certain of FWI and its subsidiaries’ assets (which approximates $121.5 million of current assets and property and equipment as of June 30, 2010) and is without recourse to the Parent Company. FWI is subject to certain compliance provisions including, but not limited to, maintaining certain funded debt and fixed charge coverage ratios, tangible asset concentration levels, and capital expenditure limitations as well as restrictions on indebtedness, guarantees and other contingent obligations and transactions. Events of default under the credit agreement include customary events, such as change of control, breach of covenants or breach of representations and warranties. At June 30, 2010, FWI was in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement.
Considering the outstanding borrowings of $30.0 million, and $5.5 million related to outstanding letters of credit, the unused borrowing capacity under the credit agreement was $14.5 million at June 30, 2010, with a limit of $5.0 million of this capacity remaining for the designated borrowers.
5. Retirement Plan
Two of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans, one plan covering certain of its United Kingdom employees (the “U.K. Plan”) and the other covering certain of its Norwegian employees (the “Norwegian Plan”). Since the Norwegian Plan represents approximately two percent of the Company’s total pension plan assets and liabilities, only the schedule of net periodic pension cost includes combined amounts from the two plans, while assumption and narrative information relates solely to the U.K. Plan.
Net pension cost for the U.K. and Norwegian Plans includes the following components (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Service cost
  $ 198     $ 126     $ 404     $ 237  
Interest cost
    879       842       1,779       1,586  
Expected return on plan assets
    (862 )     (770 )     (1,745 )     (1,450 )
Amortization of prior service cost
    (23 )     (25 )     (46 )     (47 )
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    260       47       526       89  
 
                       
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 452     $ 220     $ 918     $ 415  
 
                       
The expected long-term rate of return on invested assets is determined based on the weighted average of expected returns on asset investment categories as follows: 6.8% overall, 8.5% for equities and 5.1% for bonds. Estimated annual pension plan contributions are assumed to be consistent with the current expected contribution level of $0.8 million for 2010.
6. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has stock option plans and agreements which allow for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the total compensation cost charged against income and included in selling, general and administrative expenses for stock-based compensation arrangement was $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 includes $0.2 million associated with accelerated vesting of awards in connection with the retirement of the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company during the first quarter of 2010. Tax effects from stock-based compensation are insignificant due to the Company’s current domestic tax position. The Company uses authorized but unissued shares of common stock for stock option exercises and restricted stock issuances pursuant to the Company’s share-based compensation plan and treasury stock for issuances outside of the plan. As of June 30, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

12


Table of Contents

7. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets includes the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Net actuarial loss and prior service credit
  $ (16,325 )   $ (17,902 )
Less: deferred tax benefit
    4,551       4,991  
 
           
Net of tax
    (11,774 )     (12,911 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    (2,272 )     1,284  
 
           
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ (14,046 )   $ (11,627 )
 
           
8. Income Taxes
The Company maintains a valuation allowance to adjust the basis of net deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 740 Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). As a result, substantially all domestic federal income taxes, as well as certain state and foreign income taxes, recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were fully offset by a corresponding change in valuation allowance. The income tax expense recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted primarily of income taxes due in foreign and state jurisdictions of the Company.
Income tax expense differs from the expected tax at statutory rates due primarily to the change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and different tax rates in the various foreign jurisdictions. Additionally, the aggregate tax expense is not always consistent when comparing periods due to the changing income before income taxes mix between domestic and foreign operations and within the foreign operations. In concluding that a full valuation allowance on domestic federal and certain state and foreign income taxes was required, the Company primarily considered such factors as the history of operating losses and the nature of the deferred tax assets. Interim period income tax expense or benefit is computed at the estimated annual effective tax rate, unless adjusted for specific discrete items as required.
Income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes was approximately 29.5% and 46.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes was approximately 29.4% and 71.8%, respectively. The changes in the rates are related to changes in the mix of income before income taxes between countries whose income taxes are offset by full valuation allowance and those that are not. The difference in mix, combined with the lower level of income before income taxes, resulted in a significantly higher effective income tax rate in 2009.
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company recognizes the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the applicable taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit recognized is based on the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority.
Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax rate because non-current unrecognized tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of the income tax provision. The Company incurred no significant interest or penalties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and would impact the effective tax rate for certain foreign jurisdictions if recognized.

13


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
         
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 1,007  
Additions based on tax positions
    131  
Reductions due to lapses of statutes of limitations
    (31 )
 
     
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 1,107  
 
     
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The Company has recorded, in other liabilities, an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities related to the remediation of site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount of $1.2 million and $1.3 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Furmanite America, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, is involved in disputes with two customers, who are each negotiating with a governmental regulatory agency and claim that the subsidiary failed to provide them with satisfactory services at the customers’ facilities. On April 17, 2009, a customer, INEOS USA LLC, initiated legal action against the subsidiary in the Common Pleas Court of Allen County, Ohio, alleging that the subsidiary and one of its former employees, who performed data services at one of the customer’s facilities, breached its contract with the customer and failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information to support the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facility from 1998 through the second quarter of 2005. The customer’s complaint seeks damages in an amount that the subsidiary believes represents the total proposed civil penalty, plus the cost of unspecified supplemental environmental projects requested by the regulatory agency to reduce air emissions at the customer’s facility, and also seeks unspecified punitive damages. The subsidiary believes that it provided the customer with adequate and timely information to support the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facilities and will vigorously defend against the customer’s claim.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35 million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believed that the sales broker was an affiliate of another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its affiliates, against the subsidiary. The action to vacate the arbitration award terminated and in January 2010, the subsidiary paid the full amount of the arbitration award plus accrued interest to the sales broker. In separate actions, the subsidiary was seeking to enforce the prior settlement agreement executed by the sales broker’s affiliate and obtain an equitable offset of the arbitration award, however, upon mutual agreement by all parties, these separate actions were dismissed in July 2010.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $1.9 million and $3.4 million were recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
10. Business Segment Data and Geographical Information
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. For financial reporting purposes, the Company operates in a single segment.
The technical services segment provides technical services to an international client base that includes petroleum refineries, chemical plants, pipelines, offshore drilling and production platforms, steel mills, food and beverage processing facilities, power generation, and other flow-process industries.

14


Table of Contents

Geographical areas are the Americas (which includes operations in North America and Latin America), EMEA (which includes operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa) and Asia-Pacific. For comparative purposes, the Americas geographical area is formerly known as the United States. The geographical area was renamed to incorporate operations in Canada and expected future expansion in North America and Latin America. The following geographical area information includes revenues by major service line based on the physical location of the operations (in thousands):
                                 
                    Asia-        
    Americas     EMEA     Pacific     Total  
Three months ended June 30, 2010:
                               
Under pressure services
  $ 12,359     $ 8,049     $ 4,174     $ 24,582  
Turnaround services
    15,678       14,654       6,863       37,195  
Other services
    9,513       5,143       1,080       15,736  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 37,550     $ 27,846     $ 12,117     $ 77,513  
 
                       
 
                               
Three months ended June 30, 2009:
                               
Under pressure services
  $ 11,191     $ 8,416     $ 4,533     $ 24,140  
Turnaround services
    14,206       13,507       3,772       31,485  
Other services
    6,905       6,291       905       14,101  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 32,302     $ 28,214     $ 9,210     $ 69,726  
 
                       
 
                               
Six months ended June 30, 2010:
                               
Under pressure services
  $ 23,737     $ 17,604     $ 8,238     $ 49,579  
Turnaround services
    31,041       25,290       10,581       66,912  
Other services
    14,339       11,213       1,905       27,457  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 69,117     $ 54,107     $ 20,724     $ 143,948  
 
                       
 
                               
Six months ended June 30, 2009:
                               
Under pressure services
  $ 20,582     $ 18,147     $ 7,195     $ 45,924  
Turnaround services
    29,688       24,281       6,176       60,145  
Other services
    12,106       12,985       1,598       26,689  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 62,376     $ 55,413     $ 14,969     $ 132,758  
 
                       

15


Table of Contents

Historically, the Company has not allocated headquarter costs to its operating locations. However, if the headquarter costs had been allocated to all the operating locations, the operating income by geographical area based on physical location would have been as follows (in thousands):
                                 
                    Asia-        
    Americas     EMEA     Pacific     Total  
Three months ended June 30, 2010:
                               
Operating income1
  $ 515     $ 1,569     $ 3,442     $ 5,526  
Allocation of headquarter costs
    2,187       (1,536 )     (651 )      
 
                       
Adjusted operating income
  $ 2,702     $ 33     $ 2,791     $ 5,526  
 
                       
 
                               
Three months ended June 30, 2009:
                               
Operating income (loss)
  $ (2,015 )   $ 883     $ 1,938     $ 806  
Allocation of headquarter costs
    1,969       (1,487 )     (482 )      
 
                       
Adjusted operating income (loss)
  $ (46 )   $ (604 )   $ 1,456     $ 806  
 
                       
 
                               
Six months ended June 30, 2010:
                               
Operating income (loss)2
  $ (169 )   $ 933     $ 5,223     $ 5,987  
Allocation of headquarter costs
    4,317       (3,146 )     (1,171 )      
 
                       
Adjusted operating income (loss)
  $ 4,148     $ (2,213 )   $ 4,052     $ 5,987  
 
                       
 
                               
Six months ended June 30, 2009:
                               
Operating income (loss)
  $ (2,920 )   $ 2,958     $ 2,408     $ 2,446  
Allocation of headquarter costs
    3,337       (2,625 )     (712 )      
 
                       
Adjusted operating income
  $ 417     $ 333     $ 1,696     $ 2,446  
 
                       
 
1   Includes restructuring charges totaling $0.2 million and $0.7 million in the Americas and EMEA, respectively.
 
2   Includes restructuring charges totaling $0.4 million and $2.3 million in the Americas and EMEA, respectively.
The following geographical area information includes total long-lived assets (which consist of all non-current assets, other than goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and deferred tax assets) based on physical location (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Americas
  $ 17,165     $ 17,050  
EMEA
    10,570       11,248  
Asia-Pacific
    3,356       3,717  
 
           
 
  $ 31,091     $ 32,015  
 
           
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Risk
Fair value is defined under FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820-10”), as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820-10 must maximize the use of the observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard established a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.
  Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets.
  Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments.

16


Table of Contents

  Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The Company currently does not have any assets or liabilities that would require valuation under ASC 820-10, except for pension assets. The Company does not have any derivatives or marketable securities. The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of all debt as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 approximated the carrying value. These fair values were estimated based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, when quoted market prices were not available. The estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange.
The Company provides services to an international client base that includes petroleum refineries, chemical plants, offshore energy production platforms, steel mills, nuclear power stations, conventional power stations, pulp and paper mills, food and beverage processing plants, other flow process facilities as well as the U.S. government. The Company does not believe that it has a significant concentration of credit risk at June 30, 2010, as the Company’s accounts receivable are generated from these business industries with customers located throughout the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific.
12. Restructuring
During the fourth quarter of 2009 and in the first half of 2010, the Company committed to cost reduction initiatives, including planned workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions. The Company has taken these specific actions in order to more strategically align the Company’s operating, selling, general and administrative costs relative to revenues.
2009 Cost Reduction Initiative
The Company has completed a substantial portion of this cost reduction initiative, which began in the fourth quarter of 2009, however, certain lease termination costs related to this initiative, are expected to be recognized over the next several quarters. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, restructuring costs of $0.3 million were incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, restructuring costs of $0.7 million and $1.4 million were incurred and are included in operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively. The total restructuring costs estimated to be incurred in connection with this cost reduction initiative are $3.4 million. As of June 30, 2010, the costs incurred since inception of this cost reduction initiative totaled approximately $3.2 million, with approximately $0.2 million remaining related to lease termination costs expected to be incurred during the remainder of 2010 and into 2011.
2010 Cost Reduction Initiative
In 2010, the Company continued to review its business for operating efficiencies. As a result of this review, additional selling, general and administrative cost reduction opportunities were identified, which resulted in further restructuring costs. These additional cost reduction opportunities relate primarily to improving the operational and administrative efficiency of the Company’s EMEA operations, while providing a structure which will allow for future expansion of operations within the region. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, restructuring costs, related to the 2010 cost reduction initiative, of $0.6 million were incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Although all costs associated with this restructuring initiative have not yet been determined, the Company expects to incur total costs of approximately $4.0 million in connection with this cost reduction initiative.
In connection with these initiatives, the Company has recorded estimated expenses for severance, lease cancellations, and other restructuring costs in accordance with FASB ASC 420-10, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” and FASB ASC 712-10, “Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.

17


Table of Contents

The activity related to reserves associated with the cost reduction initiatives for the six months ended June 30, 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
                                         
    Reserve at                           Reserve at
    December 31,                   Foreign currency   June 30,
    2009   Charges   Cash payments   adjustments   2010
     
2009 Initiative
                                       
Severance and benefit costs
  $ 690     $ 1,286     $ (1,633 )   $ (61 )   $ 282  
Lease termination costs
          405       (290 )     (1 )     114  
Other restructuring costs
          441       (416 )           25  
 
                                       
2010 Initiative
                                       
Severance and benefit costs
          592       (264 )     17       345  
     
 
  $ 690     $ 2,724     $ (2,603 )   $ (45 )   $ 766  
     
Restructuring costs associated with the cost reduction initiatives consist of the following (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009  
Severance and benefit costs
  $ 692     $     $ 1,878     $  
Lease termination costs
    89             405        
Other restructuring costs
    89             441        
 
                       
 
  $ 870     $     $ 2,724     $  
 
                       
Restructuring costs were incurred in the following geographical areas (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009  
Americas
  $ 180     $     $ 367     $  
EMEA
    690             2,357        
 
                       
 
  $ 870     $     $ 2,724     $  
 
                       
Total workforce reductions related to the cost reduction initiatives included terminations for 117 employees, which include reductions of 27 employees in the Americas, 89 employees in EMEA, and one employee in Asia-Pacific.

18


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Furmanite Corporation included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Business Overview
Furmanite Corporation (the “Parent Company”) together with its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) provides specialized technical services, including under pressure services which include leak sealing, hot tapping, line stopping, line isolation, composite repair and valve testing; turnaround services which include on-site machining, heat treatment, bolting, valve repair; and other services which includes heat exchanger design and repair, concrete repair and valve and other product manufacturing. These products and services are provided primarily to electric power generating plants, petroleum refineries and other process industries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa (collectively “EMEA”), North America and Latin America (collectively “Americas”), and Asia-Pacific through Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and its domestic and international subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Furmanite”).
Financial Overview
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, consolidated revenues increased by $7.8 million and $11.2 million, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily related to increases in leak sealing, hot tapping, line stopping and bolting services. The Company’s net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $3.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net income was a result of the increase in revenues as well as operational improvements realized as a result of the cost reduction initiatives which began in late 2009 and have continued through the first half of 2010.
In December 2009, the Company committed to a cost reduction initiative, including planned workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions, in order to more strategically align the Company’s operating, selling, general and administrative costs relative to revenues. The Company expects to incur total costs of approximately $3.4 million in connection with this cost reduction initiative. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has completed a substantial portion of the 2009 cost reduction initiative with total restructuring costs incurred since its inception of approximately $3.2 million, of which $0.3 million and $2.1 million were incurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Additional lease termination costs of $0.2 million related to this initiative are expected to be incurred throughout the remainder of 2010 and into 2011.
In May 2010, the Company committed to an additional cost reduction initiative, primarily related to the consolidation of certain functions within the Company’s EMEA operations. The Company has taken and continues to take specific actions in order to improve the operational and administrative efficiency of its EMEA operations, while providing a structure which will allow for future expansion of operations within the region. Although all costs associated with this restructuring initiative have not yet been determined, the Company expects to incur total costs of approximately $4.0 million in connection with this cost reduction initiative, which are expected to be primarily related to severance and benefit costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, restructuring costs of $0.6 million were incurred as a result of this additional cost reduction initiative. The Company expects to complete the 2010 cost reduction initiative in 2011, with the majority of these costs expected in the second half of 2010. Upon completion of the 2010 cost reduction initiative, the Company estimates the effects of the initiative to result in annual cost reductions of approximately $5.0 million, primarily compensation costs, half of which will affect operating costs with the other half impacting selling, general and administrative costs.
As a result of these two initiatives, total restructuring costs negatively impacted operating income by $0.9 million and $2.7 million and net income by $0.8 million and $2.4 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
The Company’s diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $0.10 and $0.11, respectively, compared to $0.01 and $0.03 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

19


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (in thousands, except per share data)  
Revenues
  $ 77,513     $ 69,726     $ 143,948     $ 132,758  
Costs and expenses:
                               
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    51,922       47,261       97,584       89,839  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    1,572       1,447       3,121       2,790  
Selling, general and administrative expense
    18,493       20,212       37,256       37,683  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    71,987       68,920       137,961       130,312  
 
                       
Operating income
    5,526       806       5,987       2,446  
Interest income and other income (expense), net
    (246 )     313       96       219  
Interest expense
    (241 )     (299 )     (482 )     (592 )
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    5,039       820       5,601       2,073  
Income tax expense
    (1,479 )     (589 )     (1,650 )     (962 )
 
                       
Net income
  $ 3,560     $ 231     $ 3,951     $ 1,111  
 
                       
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  
Diluted
  $ 0.10     $ 0.01     $ 0.11     $ 0.03  

20


Table of Contents

Geographical Information
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Revenues:
                               
Americas
  $ 37,550     $ 32,302     $ 69,117     $ 62,376  
EMEA
    27,846       28,214       54,107       55,413  
Asia-Pacific
    12,117       9,210       20,724       14,969  
 
                       
Total revenues
    77,513       69,726       143,948       132,758  
 
                               
Costs and expenses:
                               
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
                               
Americas
    25,260       21,745       46,024       41,981  
EMEA
    19,805       20,267       39,732       38,890  
Asia-Pacific
    6,857       5,249       11,828       8,968  
 
                       
Total operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    51,922       47,261       97,584       89,839  
Operating costs as a percentage of revenue
    67.0 %     67.8 %     67.8 %     67.7 %
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization expense
                               
Americas, including corporate
    846       812       1,658       1,602  
EMEA
    453       394       920       745  
Asia-Pacific
    273       241       543       443  
 
                       
Total depreciation and amortization expense
    1,572       1,447       3,121       2,790  
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue
    2.0 %     2.1 %     2.2 %     2.1 %
 
                               
Selling, general and administrative expense
                               
Americas, including corporate
    10,929       11,760       21,604       21,713  
EMEA
    6,019       6,670       12,522       12,820  
Asia-Pacific
    1,545       1,782       3,130       3,150  
 
                       
Total selling general and administrative expense
    18,493       20,212       37,256       37,683  
Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue
    23.9 %     29.0 %     25.9 %     28.4 %
 
                               
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
  $ 71,987     $ 68,920     $ 137,961     $ 130,312  
 
                       
Geographical areas are the Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific. The following discussion and analysis, as it relates to geographic information, excludes any allocation of headquarter costs to EMEA or Asia-Pacific.
Revenues
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, consolidated revenues increased by $11.2 million, or 8.4%, to $143.9 million, compared to $132.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted revenues by $2.9 million, of which $2.7 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million were related to favorable impacts from Asia-Pacific, EMEA, and Americas, respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, revenues increased by $8.3 million, or 6.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year. This $8.3 million increase in revenues consisted of a $6.6 million increase in the Americas and a $3.1 million increase in Asia-Pacific, partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in EMEA. The increase in revenues in the Americas was due to increases in under pressure services, which included volume increases in leak sealing and line stopping of approximately 14.8% when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year. Additionally, revenues increased within other services by approximately 14.7% related to volume increases in product and other manufacturing services, including a $4.7 million hot tapping equipment package sale. The increase in revenues in Asia-Pacific was primarily attributable to increases in turnaround services in Australia, which included volume increases in bolting services of approximately 39.6% when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year. The decrease in revenues in EMEA was

21


Table of Contents

primarily attributable to volume decreases in other services of approximately 14.4% and primarily related to decreases within product and other manufacturing services. Partially offsetting this decrease were increases in turnaround services, which included volume increases in bolting services of approximately 6.4%, when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, consolidated revenues increased by $7.8 million, or 11.2%, to $77.5 million, compared to $69.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenues by $0.4 million, of which $1.6 million was related to unfavorable impacts in EMEA which were partially offset by favorable impacts of $1.2 million in Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, revenues increased by $8.2 million, or 11.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year. This $8.2 million increase in revenues consisted of increases of $5.3 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEA, respectively. The increase in revenues in the Americas was due to increases in under pressure, turnaround and other services, which primarily included volume increases in leak sealing services of approximately 11.1%, bolting services of approximately 6.5% and product and other manufacturing services of approximately 39.3% when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year. The increase in manufacturing and product sales includes a $4.7 million hot tapping equipment package sale. The increase in revenues in Asia-Pacific was primarily attributable to increases in turnaround services in Australia, which included volume increases in bolting services of approximately 46.6% when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year. The increase in revenues in EMEA was attributable to volume increases in turnaround services of approximately 15.8%, which included volume increases in bolting and on-site machining services. Partially offsetting this increase were decreases in other services of approximately 13.8% and primarily related to decreases within product and other manufacturing services, when compared to revenues in the same period in the prior year.
Operating Costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, operating costs, including $0.7 million of restructuring costs, increased $7.7 million, or 8.6%, to $97.5 million, compared to $89.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted costs by $1.9 million, of which $1.7 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million were related to unfavorable impacts from Asia-Pacific, EMEA and the Americas, respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, operating costs increased $5.8 million, or 6.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This change consisted of a $3.9 million, $1.2 million, and a $0.7 million increase in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEA, respectively. The increase in operating costs in the Americas was primarily related to higher material and labor costs of approximately 6.5% when compared to the same period in the prior year, which were attributable to the increase in revenue. The increase in operating costs in Asia-Pacific was primarily attributable to an increase in labor and material costs of approximately 9.5% when compared to the same period in the prior year associated with the increased revenues in Australia. The increase in EMEA was primarily due to $0.7 million of severance related restructuring costs.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, operating costs increased $4.6 million, or 9.7%, to $51.9 million, compared to $47.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted costs by $0.4 million, of which $1.2 million related to favorable impacts from EMEA but were partially offset by unfavorable impacts of $0.8 million in Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, operating costs increased $5.0 million, or 10.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This change consisted of a $3.5 million, $0.8 million, and a $0.7 million increase in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEA, respectively. The increase in operating costs in the Americas was primarily related to higher material and labor costs of approximately 11.6% as well as a slight increase in travel costs, when compared to the same period in the prior year, which were attributable to the increase in revenue. The increase in operating costs in Asia-Pacific was primarily attributable to an increase in labor and material costs of approximately 11.9% when compared to the same period in the prior year associated with the increased revenues in Australia. The increase in EMEA was primarily due increased labor and material costs of approximately 1%, when compared to the same period in the prior year, consistent with the increase in revenue.
Operating costs as a percentage of revenue were 67.8% and 67.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 67.0% and 67.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.1 million, or 8.6% and $0.3 million, or 11.8%, respectively, when compared to the same periods in the prior year. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted depreciation and amortization expense by $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, with minimal impact for the three months ending June 30, 2010. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, depreciation and

22


Table of Contents

amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million higher compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively, due to capital expenditures of approximately $7.0 million over the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2010.
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue were 2.2% and 2.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 2.0% and 2.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses, including $2.0 million of restructuring costs, decreased $0.4 million, or 1.1%, to $37.3 million compared to $37.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted costs by $0.4 million, which were related to unfavorable impacts in Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate differences, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.8 million, or 2.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This $0.8 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs consisted of a $0.4 million, $0.3 million and a $0.1 million decrease in Asia-Pacific, EMEA and the Americas, respectively. In Asia-Pacific, decreases in selling, general and administrative costs were primarily a result of reductions in salary and related cost and travel expenses of approximately 8.3% when compared to the same period in the prior year. In EMEA, decreases in selling, general and administrative costs were primarily a result of reductions in salary and related costs of approximately 9.5% when compared to the same period in the prior year. These decreases were substantially offset by restructuring costs of $1.6 million incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010, which included $1.0 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million related to severance and benefit costs, lease termination costs and other restructuring costs, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expense in the Americas declined slightly as reductions in costs of approximately 4.7% were substantially offset by $0.5 million of costs incurred in connection with the retirement of the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as severance related restructuring charges of $0.4 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses, including $0.9 million of restructuring costs, decreased $1.7 million, or 8.5%, to $18.5 million compared to $20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Changes related to foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted costs by $0.2 million, of which $0.3 million were related to favorable impacts in EMEA and were partially offset by unfavorable impacts of $0.1 million in Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate differences, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 7.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This $1.5 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs consisted of a $0.8 million, $0.4 million and a $0.3 million decrease in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and EMEA, respectively. The Americas decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was related to reductions in salary and related costs, rent and travel expenses and other professional fees of approximately 5.7%, but was partially offset by additional severance related restructuring charges of $0.2 million when compared to the same period in the prior year. In Asia-Pacific, decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses were primarily a result of reductions in salary and related cost and travel expenses of approximately 14.8% when compared to the prior year. Decreases in selling, general and administrative costs in EMEA were primarily a result of reductions in salary and related costs of approximately 15.7% when compared to the same period in the prior year. These decreases were offset by restructuring costs of $0.7 million incurred in the three months ended June 30, 2010, which included $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million related to severance and benefit costs, lease termination costs and other restructuring costs, respectively.
As a result of the above factors, selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues decreased to 23.9% and 25.9% for the three and six months ending June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 29.0% and 28.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Other Income
Interest Expense
For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, consolidated interest expense decreased by $0.1 million, when compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in interest expense for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, resulted from a decrease in average outstanding debt and interest rates when compared to the same periods in 2009.
Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, interest income and other income (expense) decreased $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, when compared to the same periods in the prior year. Interest income and other income (expense) primarily

23


Table of Contents

relates to foreign currency exchange gains and losses, however, the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 include approximately $0.3 million of income related to a release of environmental liabilities.
Income Taxes
The Company maintains a valuation allowance to adjust the basis of net deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 Income Taxes (“ASC 740). As a result, substantially all domestic federal income taxes, as well as certain state and foreign income taxes, recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were fully offset by a corresponding change in valuation allowance. The income tax expense recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted primarily of income taxes due in foreign and state jurisdictions of the Company.
Income tax expense differs from the expected tax at statutory rates due primarily to the change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and different tax rates in the various foreign jurisdictions. Additionally, the aggregate tax expenses are not always consistent when comparing periods due to the changing income before income taxes mix between domestic and foreign operations and within the foreign operations. In concluding that a full valuation allowance on domestic federal and certain state and foreign income taxes was required, the Company primarily considered such factors as the history of operating losses and the nature of the deferred tax assets. Interim period income tax expense or benefit is computed at the estimated annual effective tax rate, unless adjusted for specific discrete items as required.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes decreased to 29.4% and 29.5%, respectively, compared to 71.8% and 46.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The changes in the rates are related to changes in the mix of income before income taxes between countries whose income taxes are offset by full valuation allowance and those that are not. The difference in mix, combined with the lower level of income before income taxes, resulted in a significantly higher effective income tax rate in 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s liquidity and capital resources requirements include the funding of working capital needs, the funding of capital investments and the financing of internal growth.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to changes in working capital requirements, driven by an increase in accounts receivable, that decreased cash flows by $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an increase of approximately $1.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. The changes are primarily due to the increase in revenues compared to the same period in 2009. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were partially offset by a $2.8 million increase in net income in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in prior year. In addition, the Company paid approximately $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 related to an arbitration award settlement.
Net cash used in investing activities was $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Investing activities primarily consist of capital expenditures which totaled $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $3.0 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in capital expenditures compared to the prior year is due to the deferment of certain capital projects in 2009 due to the difficult economic environment, as well as expenditures in the current year associated with the consolidation of certain facilities as part of the Company’s cost reduction initiatives.
Consolidated capital expenditures for fiscal year 2010 have been budgeted at $9.0 million to $11.0 million. Such expenditures, however, will depend on many factors beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, demand for services as well as domestic and foreign government regulations. No assurance can be given that required capital expenditures will not exceed anticipated amounts during 2010 or thereafter. Capital expenditures during the year are expected to be funded from existing cash and anticipated cash flows from operations.
Net cash used in financing activities was $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Financing activities primarily consisted of principal payments on long-term capital leases.
While the Company’s operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 have improved as compared to the same period last year, the effect of the global financial crisis continues to impact the worldwide economy, including the markets in which the Company operates, in varying degrees, and as such, the Company believes that the risks to its business and its customers remain heightened.

24


Table of Contents

Lower levels of liquidity and capital adequacy affecting lenders, increases in defaults and bankruptcies by customers and suppliers, and volatility in credit and equity markets could continue to negatively affect the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition in a number of ways, including reductions in revenues and profits, increased bad debts, and financial instability of suppliers and insurers.
On August 4, 2009, Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (“FWI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent Company, and certain foreign subsidiaries (the “designated borrowers”) of FWI entered into a new credit agreement dated July 31, 2009 with Bank of America, N.A. (the “credit agreement”). The credit agreement, which matures on January 31, 2013, provides a revolving credit facility of up to $50.0 million. A portion of the amount available under the credit agreement (not in excess of $20.0 million) is available for the issuance of letters of credit. In addition, a portion of the amount available under the credit agreement (not in excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate) is available for swing line loans to FWI. The loans outstanding under the credit agreement may not exceed $35.0 million in the aggregate to the designated borrowers.
The proceeds from the initial borrowing on the credit agreement were $35.0 million and were used to pay the amounts outstanding under the previous loan agreement, which was scheduled to mature in January 2010, at which time the previous loan agreement was terminated by the Company. Letters of credit issued from the previous loan agreement were replaced with similar letters of credit by the credit agreement. There were no material circumstances surrounding the termination and no material early termination penalties were incurred by FWI.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $30.0 million was outstanding under the credit agreement. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at variable rates (based on the prime rate, federal funds rate or Eurocurrency rate, at the option of the borrower, including a margin above such rates, and subject to an adjustment based on a calculated funded debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the credit agreement)) which were 2.6% and 2.5% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The credit agreement contains a commitment fee, which ranges between 0.25% to 0.30% based on the funded debt to EBITDA ratio, and was 0.25% at June 30, 2010, on the unused portion of the amount available under the credit agreement. All obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by FWI and certain of its subsidiaries under a guaranty and collateral agreement, and are secured by a first priority lien on certain of FWI and its subsidiaries’ assets (which approximates $121.5 million of current assets and property and equipment as of June 30, 2010) and is without recourse to the Parent Company. FWI is subject to certain compliance provisions including, but not limited to, maintaining certain funded debt and fixed charge coverage ratios, tangible asset concentration levels, and capital expenditure limitations as well as restrictions on indebtedness, guarantees and other contingent obligations and transactions. Events of default under the credit agreement include customary events, such as change of control, breach of covenants or breach of representations and warranties. At June 30, 2010, FWI was in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement.
Considering the outstanding borrowings of $30.0 million, and $5.5 million related to outstanding letters of credit, the unused borrowing capacity under the credit agreement was $14.5 million at June 30, 2010, with a limit of $5.0 million of this capacity remaining for the designated borrowers.
The Company committed to cost reduction initiatives at the end of 2009 and in the first half of 2010 in order to more strategically align the Company’s operating, selling, general and administrative costs relative to revenues. As of June 30, 2010, the costs incurred since the inception of these cost reduction initiatives totaled approximately $3.8 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred restructuring charges of $2.7 million and made cash payments of $2.6 million related to these initiatives. As of June 30, 2010, the remaining reserve associated with these initiatives totaled $0.8 million with estimated additional charges to be incurred of approximately $3.6 million, all of which are expected to require cash payments. Total workforce reductions, which began in the fourth quarter of 2009, included terminations for 117 employees, which include reductions of 27 employees in the Americas, 89 employees in EMEA, and one employee in Asia-Pacific.
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the “Distribution”) to its stockholders in the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (“KSL”). On June 29, 2001, the Distribution was completed, with each shareholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL for each three shares of the Company’s common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, resulting in the distribution of approximately 10,850,000 KSL common shares. Pursuant to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with KSL, whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or (ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSL’s common shares and the operations of

25


Table of Contents

KSL’s businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination, administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSL’s obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in 2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At each of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
The Company does not anticipate paying any dividends as it believes investing earnings back into the Company will provide a better long-term return to stockholders in increased per share value. The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and available credit under existing debt facilities, will be sufficient to finance current operations, including the Company’s cost reduction initiative obligations, planned capital expenditure requirements and internal growth for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant policies are presented in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and under Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. These policies require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates, for which no significant changes have occurred except for restructuring accruals in the six months ended June 30, 2010, include revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill and intangible assets, stock-based compensation, income taxes, defined benefit pension plan, and contingencies. Critical accounting policies are discussed regularly, at least quarterly, with the Company’s Audit Committee.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, when realized or realizable, and earned.
Revenues are based primarily on time and materials. Substantially all projects are generally short term in nature. Revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services to customers have been rendered or products have been delivered and risk of ownership has passed to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues are recorded, net of sales tax. The Company provides limited warranties to customers, depending upon the service performed.
Revenues under long-term service contracts, generally greater than six months, are accounted for using a proportional performance method or on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes revenues on a proportional basis when a contract consists of milestones or activities that are process-related and has no other material deliverables. The Company recognizes revenues on a straight-line basis when billing terms and performance of the contract are substantially equivalent throughout the life of the contract.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Credit is extended to customers based on evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and generally collateral is not required. Accounts receivable outstanding longer than contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company regularly evaluates and adjusts accounts receivable as doubtful based on a combination of write-off history, aging analysis and information available on specific accounts. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible. Any payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance in the period the payment is received.

26


Table of Contents

Goodwill, Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). Under ASC 350, intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal or other means are amortized over their useful lives. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no significant intangible assets subject to amortization under ASC 350. Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Examples of such events or circumstances include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or a loss of key personnel.
FASB ASC 350 requires a two-step process for testing goodwill impairment. First, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication of impairment exists. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). Two or more components of an operating segment shall be aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. The Company has two reporting units, Furmanite and Xtria for the purpose of testing goodwill impairment, as the operating results of these components are reviewed separately by management and cannot be aggregated. All goodwill of the Company relates to Furmanite, accordingly, impairment of goodwill is tested for that reporting unit. Second, if an impairment is indicated, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by allocating the unit’s fair value to its assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The amount of impairment for goodwill and other intangible assets is measured as the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value.
The Company uses market capitalization as the basis for its measurement of fair value, and reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units to the enterprise market capitalization. Management considers this approach the most meaningful measure as substantially all of the Company’s fair value is attributable to the Furmanite reporting unit and the quoted market price provides the best evidence of fair value. In performing the reconciliation, the Company uses the stock price on December 31 of each year as the valuation date. On December 31, 2009, Furmanite’s fair value substantially exceeded its carrying value.
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”). Under ASC 360, the Company reviews long-lived assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Factors that may affect recoverability include changes in planned use of equipment, closing of facilities and discontinuance of service lines. Property and equipment to be held and used is reviewed at least annually for possible impairment. The Company’s impairment review is based on an estimate of the undiscounted cash flow at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset and the impairment is viewed as other than temporary. When impairment is indicated, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its fair market value. Depending on the asset, fair market value may be determined either by use of a discounted cash flow model or by reference to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition.
Stock-Based Compensation
All stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense in the financial statements and such costs are measured at the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price on the date of the grant as well as other assumptions. Assumptions utilized in the fair value calculations include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards (estimated using the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price), the risk free interest rate (based on the U.S. Treasury Note rate over the expected term of the option), the dividend yield (assumed to be zero, as the Company has not paid, nor anticipates paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future), and employee stock option exercise behavior and forfeiture assumptions (based on historical experience and other relevant factors).
Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740-10-65 on January 1, 2007. The adoption of ASC 740-10-65 had no net impact on the Company’s tax reserves during 2007. Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax rate because unrecognized non-current tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of the income tax provision.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the U.S. GAAP and tax treatment of certain income and expense items. The Company must assess and make estimates regarding the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered.

27


Table of Contents

To the extent that it is determined the deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance must be established for such assets. In making such a determination, the Company must take into account positive and negative evidence including projections of future taxable income and assessments of potential tax planning strategies.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Pension benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, expected investment return on plan assets, mortality rates and retirement rates. These rates are renewed annually and adjusted to reflect current conditions. These rates are determined based on reference to yields. The compensation increase rate is based on historical experience. The expected return on plan assets is derived from detailed periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated future long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks (standard deviations) and correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans’ asset mix. While the studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns, the assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return. Mortality and retirement rates are based on actual and anticipated plan experience. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect pension and postretirement obligation and future expense.
Contingencies
Environmental
Liabilities are recorded when site restoration or environmental remediation and cleanup obligations are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of environmental costs through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources are recognized when such recoveries become certain.
The Company capitalizes environmental costs only if the costs are recoverable and the costs extend the life, increase the capacity, or improve the safety or efficiency of property owned by the Company as compared with the condition of that property when originally constructed or acquired, or if the costs mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur and that otherwise may result from future operations or activities and the costs improve the property compared with its condition when constructed or acquired. All other environmental costs are expensed.
Other
The Company establishes a liability for all other loss contingencies, when information indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Restructuring
In the fourth quarter of 2009 and in the first half of 2010, the Company committed to cost reduction initiatives, including planned workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions. The Company has taken these specific actions in order to more strategically align its operating, selling, general and administrative costs relative to revenues. The Company has recorded estimated expenses related to these cost reduction initiatives for severance, lease cancellations, and other restructuring costs in accordance with FASB ASC 420-10, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” and FASB ASC 712-10, “Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 provides more robust disclosures about the transfers between Levels 1 and 2, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements and clarifies the level of disaggregation and disclosure related to the valuation techniques and inputs used. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the Level 3 activity disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. There was not a material impact from the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends the guidance issued in ASC 855, Subsequent Events, by not requiring SEC filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events. ASU 2010-09 was effective upon issuance. There was not a material impact from the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

28


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
The Company was not a party to any off-balance sheet transactions at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, or for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Inflation and Changing Prices
The Company does not operate or conduct business in hyper-inflationary countries nor enter into long-term supply contracts that may impact margins due to inflation. Changes in prices of goods and services are reflected on proposals, bids or quotes submitted to customers.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s principal market risk exposures (i.e., the risk of loss arising from the adverse changes in market rates and prices) are to changes in interest rates on the Company’s debt and investment portfolios and fluctuations in foreign currency.
The Company centrally manages its debt, considering investment opportunities and risks, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Based on the amount of variable rate debt, $30.0 million at June 30, 2010, an increase in interest rates by one hundred basis points would increase annual interest expense by approximately $0.3 million.
A significant portion of the Company’s business is exposed to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to foreign currencies as a result of the operations of the Company in Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Malaysia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Overall volatility in currency exchange rates has increased over the past couple of years, and while currencies in the first half of 2010 were not as volatile as in recent periods, foreign currencies exchange rate changes, primarily the Euro, the Australian Dollar and British Pound, relative to the U.S. dollar resulted in an unfavorable impact on the Company’s U.S. dollar reported revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010, but a slightly favorable impact for the three months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same periods of 2009. The revenue impact was somewhat mitigated with similar exchange effects on operating costs thereby reducing the exchange rate effect on operating income. The Company does not use interest rate or foreign currency rate hedges.
Based on the six months ended June 30, 2010, foreign currency-based revenues and operating income of $75.8 million and $6.0 million, respectively, a ten percent fluctuation of all applicable foreign currencies would result in a change in revenues and operating income of $6.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2010. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, our most recently completed fiscal quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

29


Table of Contents

FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II — Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The Company has recorded, in other liabilities, an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities related to the remediation of site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount of $1.2 million and $1.3 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Furmanite America, Inc, a subsidiary of the Company, is involved in disputes with two customers, who are each negotiating with a governmental regulatory agency and claim that the subsidiary failed to provide them with satisfactory services at the customers’ facilities. On April 17, 2009, a customer, INEOS USA LLC, initiated legal action against the subsidiary in the Common Pleas Court of Allen County, Ohio, alleging that the subsidiary and one of its former employees, who performed data services at one of the customer’s facilities, breached its contract with the customer and failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information to support the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facility from 1998 through the second quarter of 2005. The customer’s complaint seeks damages in an amount that the subsidiary believes represents the total proposed civil penalty, plus the cost of unspecified supplemental environmental projects requested by the regulatory agency to reduce air emissions at the customer’s facility, and also seeks unspecified punitive damages. The subsidiary believes that it provided the customer with adequate and timely information to support the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facilities and will vigorously defend against the customer’s claim.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35 million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believed that the sales broker was an affiliate of another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its affiliates, against the subsidiary. The action to vacate the arbitration award terminated and in January 2010, the subsidiary paid the full amount of the arbitration award plus accrued interest to the sales broker. In separate actions, the subsidiary was seeking to enforce the prior settlement agreement executed by the sales broker’s affiliate and obtain an equitable offset of the arbitration award, however, upon mutual agreement by all parties, these separate actions were dismissed in July 2010.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $1.9 million and $3.4 million were recorded in accrued expenses as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no material changes to the risk factors reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

30


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
     
3.1
  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 26, 1979, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-16.
 
   
3.2
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated April 30, 1981, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981.
 
   
3.3
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated May 28, 1985, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1985.
 
   
3.4
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 17, 1985, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1985.
 
   
3.5
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated July 10, 1990, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990.
 
   
3.6
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 21, 1990, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1990.
 
   
3.7
  Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated August 8, 2001, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2001.
 
   
3.8
  By-laws of the Registrant, as amended and restated June 14, 2007, filed as Exhibit 3.8 to the Registrant’s 10-K for the year then ended December 31, 2007, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference.
 
   
4.1
  Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights related to the Registrant’s Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
 
   
4.2
  Rights Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2008, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, as Rights Agent, which includes as exhibits, the Form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Stock, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A/A filed on April 18, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
 
   
4.3
  Letters to stockholders of the Registrant, dated April 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A/A filed on April 18, 2008).
 
   
4.4
  Consulting Agreement, dated April 7, 2010, among Furmanite Corporation and Michael L. Rose, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, as Consultant, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
 
   
10.1
  Credit Agreement, dated July 31, 2009, among Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Compass Bank as Syndication Agent and the Lenders party thereto, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009.
 
   
10.2
  Guaranty and Collateral Agreement, dated July 31, 2009, among Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and each of the other grantors (as defined therein) in favor of Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009.
 
   
31.1*
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of August 6, 2010.
 
   
31.2*
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of August 6, 2010.
 
   
32.1*
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of August 6, 2010.
 
   
32.2*
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of August 6, 2010.
 
*   Filed herewith.

31


Table of Contents

Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  FURMANITE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
 
  /s/ ROBERT S. MUFF    
  Robert S. Muff   
  Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 
 
Date: August 6, 2010

32