UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549-1004

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x               Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2010

or

o                  Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-21681

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1440 CORPORATE DRIVE

IRVING, TEXAS 75038

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(972) 819-0700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES x  NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  o     No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES o  NO x

As of August 3, 2010, 26,555,280 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

(Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited and in thousands)

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

The Company paid interest of $847 and $659 during six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company paid income taxes of $67 and $79 during six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

1.        GENERAL

The condensed consolidated balance sheet of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc., at December 31, 2009, presented within this Report on Form 10-Q, has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six  months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results, and cash flows for the interim periods presented in this quarterly report. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results of operations and cash flows for the three and six  months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for any other period or the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.

Unless the context otherwise provides, all references to “the Company,”  “we,” “us,” and “our” include EF Johnson Technologies, Inc., its predecessor entity and its subsidiaries, including E.F. Johnson Company, Transcrypt International, Inc., and 3e Technologies International, Inc. on a consolidated basis. All references to “EF Johnson” refer to E.F. Johnson Company, all references to “Transcrypt” refer to Transcrypt International, Inc., and all references to “3eTI” refer to 3e Technologies International, Inc.

On April 1, 2009, Transcrypt International, Inc. merged into E.F. Johnson Company.

The Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Original Merger Agreement”) dated as of May 15, 2010, with FP-EF Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and FP-EF Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), as amended by that Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 19, 2010 (the “Amendment,” together with the Original Merger Agreement, the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation (“Surviving Corporation”) and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.  Parent is an affiliate of Francisco Partners II, L.P., a global technology-focused private equity fund.

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders will receive $1.50 per share in cash for their shares of stock of the Company, at which time the Company will be privately held. Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, among others, (i) approval of the Company’s stockholders, (ii) expiration or termination of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino Act waiting period, if applicable, (iii) absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (iv) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to the Company’s business and compliance by the Company with its covenants contained in the Merger Agreement, and (v) stockholders owning no more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock dissenting from the Merger and seeking appraisal rights.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Parent, and further provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the Company will be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $1.5 million and/or reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses up to $1.0 million.  Additionally, the Company’s only recourse if Parent breaches the Merger Agreement or the Company terminates the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances is the right to receive a reverse termination fee from Parent of $3.5 million and up to $1.0 million as reimbursement for certain of the Company’s out-of-pocket expenses.  The Company cannot seek equitable relief to enforce Parent to consummate the Merger.

Parent and Merger Sub have represented and warranted that they will have sufficient financing to consummate the Merger and there is no financing condition to closing.  Additionally, Francisco Partners II, L.P. and Francisco Partners Parallel Fund II, L.P., affiliates of Parent, have delivered to the Company a limited guarantee with respect to the payment of the Parent Termination Fee and out-of-pocket expenses of the Company.

5

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

2.        ORGANIZATION AND CONSOLIDATION

We are a provider of secure wireless solutions that are sold to: (1) domestic and foreign public safety / public service entities, (2) federal, state and local governmental agencies, including the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, and (3) domestic and foreign commercial customers.  Through EFJohnson, Transcrypt and 3eTI we design, develop, market, and support:

·                  mobile and portable wireless radios;

·                  stationary transmitters / receivers (base stations or repeaters);

·                  infrastructure equipment and systems;

·                  secure encryption technologies for proprietary wireless radios;

·                  customized wireless network centric products and systems to the federal government primarily under government funded Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs; and

·                  niche hardware and secure software technologies for the WLAN markets primarily in the government and industrial controls sectors.

Our products are marketed under the “EFJohnson,” “3eTI” and “Transcrypt” brandnames.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation. In order to be competitive in the public safety/public service market that has moved towards convergent telecommunications solutions with demand for interoperability and the continued transition from analog to digital platforms, the Company is organized in a single centralized corporate structure. In light of the converged telecommunication markets and our corporate structure, the Company has one segment to report.

3.        BUSINESS CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

The Company has incurred net losses of $12.2 million, $20.9 million and $41.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company generated net cash and cash equivalents of $4.8 million (net of restricted cash) in 2009, but used net cash and cash equivalents of $3.7 million (net of the $10.0 million term loan payment) in the first half of 2010. Additionally, the Company used net cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million and $7.2 million in fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company was not in compliance with certain of the financial covenants of its Revolving Line of Credit Loan Agreement, Term Loan Agreement and Security Agreement, as amended (the “Loan Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. for the quarter ending December 31, 2009. The Company executed an amendment to the Loan Agreement effective March 1, 2010 which waived these covenant violations on a one-time basis, but the amendment also included additional restrictions and further limited our access to liquidity (see Note 11).

As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $15.0 million due on June 30, 2010 under the term loan portion of the Loan Agreement. The Company had pledged $3.0 million to Bank of America, which is shown as Restricted Cash on our balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 that partially offset the term loan.

The Company did not anticipate that it would have sufficient cash on hand to pay off the term loan when due, without dedicating all or substantially all of our cash flow from operations to the payment of our indebtedness. The bank also indicated that it would not renew the loan agreement with terms favorable to the Company. As a result, the Company developed and implemented specific action plans to improve profitability and resolve this liquidly matter in the first half of 2010 including the following: i) flattening the organizational structure and reducing employee and operational expenses in January 2010, and ii)  retaining the services of an outside investment banking firm and to explore options available to the Company to refinance the debt, or raise additional funds through private equity or debt financing, sales of assets, or other strategic alternatives.

As more fully disclosed in Note 1 above, on May 15, 2010, the Company entered into the Original Merger Agreement  which was subsequently amended on June 19, 2010.

On May 15, 2010, the Company entered into a Seventh Amendment (the “Seventh Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement that extended the maturity of the Loan Agreement until August 31, 2010, in order to allow the Company to consummate the Merger. The bank also waived compliance with certain financial covenants contained in the Loan Agreement for the Company’s fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, on a one-time basis. In consideration of the bank’s

6

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

agreement, the Company agreed to pay down the outstanding principal balance of the term loan portion of the Loan Agreement from $15.0 million to $5.0 million on June 17, 2010. The parties further amended the Loan Agreement to increase the revolving line of credit from $3.75 million to $6.0 million effective June 17, 2010.  All future advances under the Loan Agreement will continue to be subject to the bank’s discretion.  The Seventh Amendment further requires the Company to continue to provide additional financial reporting to the bank on a monthly basis through the maturity of the loans.

On June 17, 2010, the Company paid down the outstanding principal balance of the term loan portion of the Loan Agreement from $15.0 million to $5.0 million as required by the Seventh Amendment. The Company authorized the bank to apply $5.75 million of funds held by the bank in a pledged account that reduced the outstanding principal balance of the term loan as of June 30, 2010. The Company has a remaining cash balance of $0.75 million pledged to Bank of America that is shown as part of the Restricted Cash on our balance sheet as collateral for the outstanding letter of credit. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $5.25 million available under its existing line of credit (subject to the bank’s discretion) net of the letter of credit outstanding for $0.75 million and had unrestricted cash of approximately $12.3 million.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

4.        RETROSPECTIVE ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the accounting standards related to revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables (“new accounting guidance”). The new accounting guidance permits prospective or retrospective adoption, and the Company elected to retrospectively adopt as of January 1, 2009 during the fourth quarter of 2009.

Prior to 2009, the Company had not provided a significant number of optional extended warranties; and therefore, the Company determined that the deferral of revenue associated with optional extended warranties was insignificant in prior years.

The new accounting guidance generally requires the Company to account for the sale of products and optional extended warranties as separate deliverables. The first deliverable is the hardware recognized at the time of delivery, and the second deliverable is the optional extended warranty recognized ratably over the period benefited. The new accounting guidance requires the Company to estimate a stand-alone selling price for the optional extended warranty, defer that amount as deferred revenue and recognize the revenue ratably over the period benefited.

The Company had the option of adopting the new accounting guidance at the start of the fiscal year on a prospective basis or at an interim period on a retrospective basis and elected retrospective adoption. Retrospective adoption required the Company to revise its previously issued 2009 quarterly interim financial statements as if the new accounting guidance had been applied from the beginning of the fiscal year.

7

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

The following table unaudited (in thousands, except per share amounts) presents the effects of the retrospective adoption of the new accounting guidance as of January 1, 2009 to the Company’s previously reported Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:

5.        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic income (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The diluted EPS calculation reflects the potential dilution from common stock equivalents such as stock options, stock satisfied stock appreciation rights (“SSAR’s”), restricted stock grants and restricted stock units (collectively “Incentive Shares”). For the three and six  months ended June 30, 2010 and the three months ended June 30, 2009, outstanding incentive shares with exercise prices lower than the average market price of the common stock for the period were considered common stock equivalents and were dilutive in the calculation of the diluted weighted average common shares. Outstanding incentive shares that had exercise prices higher than the average market price of the common stock for the period were considered anti-dilutive and excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 all outstanding incentive shares were considered anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the period end.  The outstanding incentive shares that are considered dilutive and anti-dilutive are as follows:

We use the treasury stock method to calculate diluted weighted average common shares, as if all such options were outstanding for the periods presented.

6.        ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of all stock option grants and stock satisfied stock appreciation rights (“SSAR’s”) (collectively “Options”). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized compensation expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to options and $0.1 million and virtually zero, respectively, related to restricted stock grants and restricted stock units.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to options and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to restricted stock grants and restricted stock units.  Additionally, $0.1 million of compensation expense was recognized related to equity grants made in the first quarter of 2009 to certain named executive officers associated with performance-based incentives earned for meeting certain operational, new product introductions and other personal goals.

8

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

7.        ESCROW FUND SETTLEMENT

On January 13, 2009, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) settling a claim made by the Company against the escrow fund established in connection with the acquisition of 3eTI by the Company in 2006.  Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “3eTI Merger Agreement”), dated July 10, 2006, by and among the Company, 3eTI, Avanti Acquisition Corp., Chih-Hsiang Li, as Stockholders’ Agent, and Steven Chen, James Whang, Chih-Hsiang Li and AEPCO, Inc., $3.6 million (or ten percent (10%) of the purchase price for 3eTI) was deposited into an escrow account at the time of closing to indemnify the Company for any claims under the 3eTI Merger Agreement.  In August 2008, the Company made a claim against the escrow fund for damages arising out of certain alleged breaches of representations and warranties contained in the 3eTI Merger Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company received on January 16, 2009, approximately $2.8 million, inclusive of interest, out of the escrow fund.  The remaining balance of the escrow fund (or approximately $1.1 million, inclusive of interest) was paid out to the former stockholders of 3eTI pursuant to the terms of the 3eTI Merger Agreement.  The Settlement Agreement also contains a mutual release of liability for claims related to the acquisition of 3eTI by the Company.

The escrow funds received as part of the settlement were recorded as a reduction of operating expense. The Company previously incurred research and development costs in connection with the re-design, re-testing and re-certification of certain 3eTI products to bring them up to specifications represented to exist at the acquisition date.

8.        INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENT AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

On July 19, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage interest costs and risks associated with changing interest rates, not for speculative or trading purposes. The interest rate swap agreement terminated on June 30, 2010. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and was recorded in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the swap were recorded in Accumulated Comprehensive Loss in the balance sheet as the derivative was assessed as effectively hedged. Changes in the fair value of the swap would have been  reclassified to other income (expense) to the extent the hedging instrument is determined to be ineffective.

The interest rate swap agreement effectively converted the variable LIBOR component of the interest rate on the $15.0 million term loan to a fixed rate of 5.64%. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company paid 5.64% and the counterparty paid LIBOR on a monthly basis.  The cumulative net unrealized loss was brought down to zero as of June 30, 2010.  Previously the cumulative net unrealized loss was included in the long term debt obligations and accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet. The following is a summary of comprehensive loss (in thousands):

9

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

9.        INVENTORIES

The following is a summary of inventories (in thousands):

10.       GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Our goodwill and intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of December 31 of each year unless events or circumstances would require an immediate review. Goodwill and intangible asset amounts are allocated to the reporting units based upon amounts allocated at the time of their respective acquisition. Intangible assets, consisting of existing technology, customer relationships, license and covenants not-to-compete, are amortized over their useful life on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets consisting of trademark and trade name and certifications are not subject to amortization.

We performed fair value-based impairment tests at December 31, 2009 and concluded that no impairment of the related goodwill or trade name had occurred.

No events occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which would indicate that an impairment of such assets had taken place as of such dates.

Amortization expense, related to intangible assets which are subject to amortization, was $0.3 million and $0.2 million  for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  Amortization expense, related to intangible assets which are subject to amortization, was $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.  Intangible assets consist of the following as of the dates indicated (in thousands):

10

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

11.       NOTE PAYABLE AND LINE OF CREDIT

We amended our Loan Agreement with Bank of America in July 2006 to increase our revolving line of credit of $15.0 million and include a term loan of $15.0 million. Both borrowings bear interest at a variable rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin (“LIBOR Margin”). The LIBOR Margin was 500 basis points at June 30, 2010 and 400 basis points at June 30, 2009. The interest rate of 5.35 % and 4.32% were in effect at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As discussed below, in conjunction with the execution of the Merger Agreement an amendment to the Loan Agreement was executed on May 15, 2010 that extended the expiration date from June 30, 2010 to August 31, 2010.

The $15.0 million term loan was fully funded and used to finance the acquisition of 3eTI. The Company did not borrow against the revolving line during 2009 or during the six months ended June 30, 2010.  There was $0.75 million open letters of credit under our line of credit at June 30, 2010 and 2009. The total available credit under the line of credit was approximately $5.25 million and $3.1 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed in more detail below, the maximum that we can borrow under the revolving credit line is $6.0 million through August 31, 2010.

The Loan Agreement provides for customary affirmative and negative covenants, including maintenance of corporate existence and certain reporting requirements, as well as limitations on debt, liens, fundamental changes, acquisitions, investments, loans, guarantees, use of proceeds and capital expenditures. In addition, the Loan Agreement contains certain financial covenants including a maximum ratio of funded debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Loan Agreement also provides for events of default that would permit the lender to accelerate the loans upon their occurrence. As collateral for the obligations under the Loan Agreement the Lender has a security interest in substantially all assets of the borrowers, including accounts receivable, inventories and general intangibles.

As noted in our Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain of the financial covenants of the Loan Agreement for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. As a result, effective March 1, 2010, we executed an amendment to the Loan Agreement whereby Bank of America waived such financial covenant defaults on a one-time basis, waived compliance with such financial covenants for the Company’s first quarter of 2010, and further amended the Loan Agreement to, among other things, (i) lower the revolving line of credit from $10.0 million to $3.75 million, (ii) make all future advances under the line subject to the lender’s discretion, (iii) further limit our ability to obtain letters of credit, (iv) require us to pledge additional cash collateral totaling $3.5 million for the remaining term of the loan agreement no later than June 15, 2010, and (v) require us to provide additional financial reporting to the bank on a monthly basis.  Failure to comply with any of these terms could constitute an event of default that would permit the lender to accelerate the loans upon their occurrence, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows.

On May 15, 2010, the Company entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Loan Agreement with Bank of America that extended the maturity of the Loan Agreement until August 31, 2010, in order to allow the Company to consummate the Merger. The bank also waived compliance with certain financial covenants contained in the Loan Agreement for the Company’s fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, on a one-time basis.  In consideration of the bank’s agreement, the Company agreed to pay down the outstanding principal balance of the term loan portion of the Loan Agreement from $15.0 million to $5.0 million on June 17, 2010.  The parties further amended the Loan Agreement to increase the revolving line of credit from $3.75 million to $6.0 million effective June 17, 2010.  All future advances under the Loan Agreement will continue to be subject to the bank’s discretion.  The Seventh Amendment further requires the Company to continue to provide additional financial reporting to the bank on a monthly basis through the maturity of the loan.  On June 17, 2010, the Company paid down the outstanding principal balance of the term loan portion of the Loan Agreement from $15.0 million to $5.0 million as required under the Seventh Amendment.  Under the terms of the Seventh Amendment, the Company authorized the bank to apply $5.75 million of funds held by the bank in a pledged account that reduced the outstanding principal balance of the term loan.

12.       INCOME TAXES

We did not record a tax benefit or provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 primarily due to our fully reserved deferred tax assets requiring no further provision for income taxes for each respective period end. The Company has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $0.5 million that did not change during the six months ended June 30, 2010

11

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

relating to carry forward of business credits. In addition, future changes in the unrecognized tax benefit will have no net impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance.

As of June 30, 2010, we have no accrual requirement for interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions since the tax benefits have not been included in prior income tax return filings.

The tax years 2005-2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. Additionally, upon inclusion of the NOL and R&D credit carry forward tax benefits from tax years 1996 to 2004 in future tax returns, the related tax benefit for the period in which the benefit arose may be subject to examination.

13.       WARRANTY COSTS

We provide a one-to-three year warranty on substantially all of our product sales, depending upon certain terms and conditions of the sale, and estimate future warranty claims based on historical experience and anticipated costs to be incurred over the life of the warranty. Warranty expense is accrued at the time of sale with an additional accrual for specific items after the sale when their existence is known and amounts are determinable. A reconciliation of changes in our accrued warranty reserve as of June 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):

14.       FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts of our current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of our term loan approximates fair value as it is based on prevailing market rates of interest. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreement represents the amount required to settle the agreement using prevailing market rates of interest.

The FASB authoritative guidance relating to the accounting for financial assets and liabilities which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, provides guidance regarding the manner in determining fair value of a financial asset when there is no active market for such asset at the measurement date and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

·                  Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

·                  Level 2—observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

·                  Level 3—unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

12

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

As of June 30, 2010, the interest rate swap agreement expired resulting in no further requirement to carry a liability in the consolidated balance sheet.  The following table provides the liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):

15.       COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are involved in certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal conduct of our business. At this time, we do not believe that any liabilities relating to such legal proceedings are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company has accrued legal settlement fees in the amount of $150,000 as of June 30, 2010. The total we have accrued in regards to all legal proceedings as of December 31, 2009 was $32,000.

In the normal course of our business activities related to sales of wireless radio systems to local and state governmental entities, we are required under certain contracts with various government authorities to provide letters of credit or performance or bid bonds that may be drawn upon if we fail to perform under our contracts. There was a $0.75 million letter of credit under our line of credit as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Performance and bid bonds, which expire on various dates, totaled $2.4 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. No bonds had been drawn upon at either date.  The majority of bonds relate to the contract awarded in May 2008 by the Government of Yukon, Canada that is collateralized by restricted cash of $2.0 million.

Litigation Relating to the Merger

Since the announcement of the Merger, two putative stockholder class action lawsuits have been filed against the Company and the members of the Board of Directors. Bruce L. Deichl and P. Elayne Wishart v. EF Johnson Technologies, Inc., et al., was filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas on May 21, 2010 and Edwin McKean, Raul Quino v. Michael Jalbert, et al. was filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas on May 26, 2010. The Plaintiffs in the Deichl and McKean lawsuits filed a consolidated amended petition on June 30, 2010. The consolidated petition names the Company, the members of the Board of Directors, Parent and Merger Sub as defendants. The consolidated petition asserts generally that the members of the Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to maximize stockholder value in the Merger and by failing to provide adequate disclosures in the Company’s June 23, 2010 preliminary proxy statement. The consolidated petition further asserts that the Company, Parent and Merger Sub aided and abetted those alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. The consolidated petition seeks, among other relief, an order enjoining the consummation of the Merger, rescissory damages or rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, other damages in an unspecified amount, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation. The Company, Francisco Partners, Parent and Merger Sub believe that these lawsuits are without merit and intend to defend them vigorously.

16.       COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

On November 15, 2007, the Company committed to an organizational plan (the “2007 Plan”) to shift from three divisions to one integrated corporate structure focused on secure wireless communications for government and industrial customers. The Plan resulted in improved efficiencies in our operations, reduced our infrastructure costs and supported a new technology roadmap driving toward a streamlined and more effective structure. Implementation of the Plan included senior and middle management changes as well as staff reductions designed to eliminate redundant positions and reflect the Company’s decision to consolidate operations and move production from three locations into a centralized operations and outsourcing program in the Dallas/Fort Worth area.  All exit costs for the 2007 plan had been incurred by March 31, 2009.

On December 31, 2009, the Company committed to a work force reduction plan (the “2009 Plan”) to realign certain executive and senior management positions as well as staff reductions resulting from the fourth quarter 2009 performance of land mobile radio product sales. The 2009 Plan was implemented in the first quarter of 2010.

13

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

Costs that were directly associated with the 2009 Plan were being recorded as “restructuring costs” and were included in general and administrative expenses. Other costs that do not qualify as restructuring costs are being classified as other operating expenses or costs of goods sold in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The timing of the recognition of costs associated with this move were determined in accordance the FASB authoritative guidance relating to the accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and provides that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity shall be recognized at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. In particular, employee-related termination costs associated with the relocation are generally recognized ratably over the period that the employees are required to provide services in order to earn the respective termination benefit.

The following table summarizes the estimates and actual exit costs incurred as of June 30, 2009 for the 2007 Plan (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the beginning and ending liability reserve for exit costs as of December 31, 2009 for the 2007 Plan (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the estimates and actual exit costs incurred as of June 30, 2010 for the 2009 Plan (in thousands):.

17.       RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the period October 2005 through June 2009, DRS Technologies, Inc. (“DRS”) was considered a related party due to Mr. Newman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of DRS, who also served as a director of the Company during this period. Effective June 5, 2009, Mr. Newman resigned as a Director of the Company due to potential conflicts of

14

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

interest relating to his position with DRS. Transactions with DRS subsequent to June 5, 2009 would not be considered related party transactions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, DRS and its related subsidiaries (part of Finmeccanica) acquired approximately $0.4 million of products from EF Johnson.

18.       RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, which amends FASB ASC 820. The updated guidance requires new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. The guidance also clarified existing fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. The guidance became effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009, with an exception for the disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  We do not anticipate the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” This ASU allows entities to make a policy election to use the milestone method of revenue recognition and provides guidance on defining a milestone and guidance on the criteria that should be met for applying the milestone method. The scope of this ASU is limited to the transactions involving milestones relating to research and development deliverables or units of accounting under which a vendor satisfies its performance obligations over a period of time, and when a portion or all of the consideration is contingent upon uncertain future events or circumstances, except when the guidance in the ASU conflicts with the guidance provided elsewhere in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. The guidance includes enhanced disclosure requirements about each arrangement, individual milestones and related contingent consideration, information about substantive milestones and factors considered in the determination. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively to milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after June 15, 2010. Early application and retrospective application are permitted. We have evaluated this new ASU and have determined that it does not have a significant impact on the determination or reporting of our financial results as of June 30, 2010. The Company is required to review certain new contracts pertinent to Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and related ASU’s on an on-going basis.

19.       SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

We have evaluated events occurring subsequent to the date of our financial statements and through the date our financial statements were issued. We have recognized the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at our balance sheet date as of June 30, 2010, including estimates inherent in the process of preparing our financial statements. There were no non-recognized subsequent events to be disclosed in our financial statements.

15

ITEM 2.          MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Discussions of certain matters contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and our industry, and reflect our beliefs and assumptions based upon information available to us at the date of this report. In some cases, you can identify these statements by words such as “if,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and other similar terms. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the results of our product development efforts, future sales and expense levels, our future financial condition, liquidity, and business prospects generally, the impact of our relocation of operating facilities, and outsourcing of manufacturing on our operating results, perceived opportunities in the marketplace for our products, and our other business plans for the future.

These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results, performance and outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements due to a number of risk factors including, but not limited to, the risks discussed in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 1A “Risk Factors” and in Part II of this report on Form 10-Q under Item 1A “Risk Factors.” We caution readers not to rely on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of this quarterly report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement for any reason except as required by law.

The following discussion is intended to provide a better understanding of the significant changes in trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

Overview

In order to be competitive in the public safety/public service market that has moved towards convergent telecommunications solutions with demand for interoperability and the continued transition from analog to digital platforms, the Company is organized in a single centralized corporate structure. In light of the converged telecommunication markets and our corporate structure, the Company has one segment to report.

We design, develop, market and support wireless radios and wireless communications infrastructure and systems for digital and analog platforms. In addition, we offer encryption technologies for wireless voice, video and data communications and we also design, develop, market and support secure wireless networking solutions that include Wi-Fi products, mesh networking, access points, and client infrastructure products. The Company’s customers include first responders in public safety and public service, the federal government, and industrial organizations.

Due to the timing of orders and seasonality, our quarterly results fluctuate. We experience seasonality in our results in part due to governmental customer spending patterns that are influenced by government fiscal year-end budgets and appropriations. The unpredictable sales cycle coupled with launching new products and solutions can also cause variations from quarter to quarter.

The Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Original Merger Agreement”) dated as of May 15, 2010, with FP-EF Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and FP-EF Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), as amended by that Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 19, 2010 (the “Amendment,” together with the Original Merger Agreement, the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation (“Surviving Corporation”) and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.  Parent is an affiliate of Francisco Partners II, L.P., a global technology-focused private equity fund.

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders will receive $1.50 per share in cash for their shares of stock of the Company, at which time the Company will be privately held. Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, among others, (i) approval of the Company’s stockholders, (ii) expiration or termination of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino Act waiting period, if applicable, (iii) absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (iv) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to the Company’s business and compliance by the Company with its covenants contained in the Merger Agreement, and (v) stockholders owning no more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock dissenting from the Merger and seeking appraisal rights.

16

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Parent, and further provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the Company will be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $1.5 million and/or reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses up to $1.0 million.  Additionally, the Company’s only recourse if Parent breaches the Merger Agreement or the Company terminates the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances is the right to receive a reverse termination fee from Parent of $3.5 million and up to $1.0 million as reimbursement for certain of the Company’s out-of-pocket expenses.  The Company cannot seek equitable relief to enforce Parent to consummate the Merger.

Parent and Merger Sub have represented and warranted that they will have sufficient financing to consummate the Merger and there is no financing condition to closing.  Additionally, Francisco Partners II, L.P. and Francisco Partners Parallel Fund II, L.P., affiliates of Parent, have delivered to the Company a limited guarantee with respect to the payment of the Parent Termination Fee and out-of-pocket expenses of the Company.

Our Products and Solutions

Our wireless radio offerings are primarily digital solutions designed to operate in both analog and digital system environments. Our products and systems are based on industry standards designed to enhance interoperability among systems, improve bandwidth efficiency, and integrate voice and data communications.

The Land Mobile Radio (“LMR”) industry utilizes two-way wireless communications through wireless networks, which include infrastructure components such as base stations, repeaters, transmitters and receivers, network switches and portable and mobile two-way communication radios. Individual users operate portable hand-held radios and vehicular-mounted radios in their wireless communications system. Utilizing licensed RF spectrum, the customer owns and operates the wireless communication system that is networked by linking together the infrastructure components. We develop customer solutions, which leverage the customer’s wireless system and wireless radios with customer specific or enterprise wide applications.

The majority of our revenues are derived from the sale of wireless radio products. Our federal, state and local governmental agency customers are increasingly demanding interoperable, secured communications products and systems. We believe this demand has created opportunities for us as we believe we are positioned to provide these products and systems. As a result, we expect to continue to allocate a majority of our on-going research and development expenditures to wireless radio features and enhancements, infrastructure components and system development efforts.

We provide the domestic and international LMR industry with secure encryption technologies for analog wireless radios. These products are specifically designed to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive voice communications in parts of the world where wireless radio systems remain analog and security needs are high. These products are sold as aftermarket add-on components or embedded components for existing analog radios and systems.

We also design, develop, market and support customized wireless network centric products and systems which include secure Wi-Fi products, including mesh networking, access point, bridge, and client infrastructure products, as well as security software. We provide sensor network solutions through our InfoMatics® middleware, which enable sensors and databases to communicate data to pertinent personnel for command and control applications in near real-time. These products and solutions utilize FIPS 140-2 validated wireless products, 802.11 wireless networking (WIFI) solutions, mesh networking and conditions based and location based telematics solutions.

Our Sales and Distribution Approach

Our products and systems are sold through multiple channels including a direct sales force, dealers, distributors, and strategic partnering arrangements. We utilize our dealer network to assist in installing, servicing, selling and distributing our products. We also generate revenues through the federal government under government funded research and development Small Business Innovative Research programs (“SBIR”). Additionally, we offer our products to commercial, non-governmental users.

Much of our business is obtained through submission of formal competitive bids. Our governmental customers generally can specify the terms, conditions and form of the contract. Our government business is subject to government funding decisions and contract types can vary widely, including cost plus, fixed priced, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”), and government-wide acquisition contracts with the General Services Administration (“GSA”), which require pre-qualification of vendors and allows government customers to more easily procure our products and systems.

Depending on the size and complexity of customer specifications and requirements, products can be shipped to the customer in a relatively short period of time (typically 90 days) or with complex integrations and various delivery dates, orders can span multiple years. For example, our longer-term system contracts and government services revenues are generated under customer contracts and agreements for which revenue is recorded under the percentage-of-completion method.

17

Description of Operating Accounts

Revenues. Revenues consist of product sales, services, and government-funded research and development services and solutions net of returns and allowances. Longer-term system and government services revenues are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales includes costs of components and materials, labor, depreciation and overhead costs associated with the production of our products and services, as well as shipping, royalty, inventory reserves, warranty product costs, and incurred cost under sales contracts.

Gross Profit. Gross profit is net revenues less the cost of sales and is affected by a number of factors, including competitive pricing, product mix, type of contract and cost of products and services including warranty and inventory reserves and conversion costs.

Research and Development. Unreimbursed research and development expenses consist primarily of costs associated with research and development personnel, materials, and the depreciation of research and development equipment and facilities. We expense all unreimbursed research and development costs as they are incurred while all research and development expenses that are reimbursed by our government customers are included as a component of cost of sales.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs of sales personnel, including sales commissions and travel expenses, as well as costs of advertising, product and program management, public relations and trade show participation.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other expenses associated with our management, post sales operations support, accounting, information systems and administrative functions. This expense also includes the impact of equity-based compensation expense and costs relating to our operating facility moves. Pertinent to 3eTI, accounting for government contracts delineates what is a direct charge allowable to include in contract costs and what is considered to be an indirect charge reflected as general and administrative expenses. We consider indirect engineering labor and operating costs such as quality, planning, operations, and company fringe benefits, general administrative salaries and other general administrative expenses as general and administrative expense.

Amortization of Intangibles.    Amortization of intangibles consist primarily amortization expense associated with the definite lived intangibles assets acquired in the 3eTI acquisition. Definite lived intangible assets, consisting of existing technology, customer relationships, license and covenants not-to-compete, are amortized over their useful life on a straight-line basis.

Escrow Fund Settlement.    Escrow fund settlement consists of funds received associated with the 3eTI reporting unit for settled claims against funds held in an escrow account. The escrow fund reimbursed the Company for previously incurred research and development costs in connection with the re-design, re-testing and re-certification of certain 3eTI products to bring them up to specifications represented to exist at the acquisition date.

Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net consists of interest expense on the term note, revolving line of credit and capital leases net of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision (benefit) for income taxes includes the increase or decrease in the valuation reserve that is based upon management’s conclusions regarding, among other considerations, our historical operating results and forecasted future earnings over a five year period, our current and expected customer base projections, and technological and competitive factors impacting our current products. Current financial accounting standards require that organizations analyze all positive and negative evidence relating to deferred tax asset realization, which would include our historical accuracy in forecasting future earnings, as well as our history of losses incurred within the past three years. Should factors underlying management’s estimates change, future adjustments, either positive or negative, to our valuation allowance may be necessary.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and all known facts and circumstances that we believe are relevant. Actual results may differ materially from our estimates. We believe the following accounting policies to be most critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations because they require us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding (1) revenues, (2) receivables, (3) inventories, (4) goodwill and other intangible assets, (5) warranty costs, (6) income taxes, (7) long-lived assets and (8) stock-based compensation. For a discussion of the critical accounting estimates, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

18

and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

19

Results of Operations

The following table presents certain Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations information as a percentage of revenues during the periods indicated: