As filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 5, 2010
Registration
No. 333-167193
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
PLY GEM HOLDINGS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3089
|
|
20-0645710
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification
No.)
|
5020 Weston Parkway,
Suite 400
Cary, North Carolina 27513
(919) 677-3900
(Address, including
zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrants principal executive offices)
Shawn K. Poe
Chief Financial Officer
Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
5020 Weston Parkway, Suite 400
Cary, North Carolina 27513
(919) 677-3900
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
John C. Kennedy, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
(212) 373-3000
|
|
Stephen L. Burns, Esq.
William J. Whelan III, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
(212) 474-1000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box: o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering: o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering: o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering: o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
CALCULATION OF
REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(2)
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
$300,000,000
|
|
|
$21,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee in accordance with
Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of 1933.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Previously paid.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We and the selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
Subject to
completion, dated August 5, 2010
Prospectus
shares
Ply Gem Holdings,
Inc.
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
common stock.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price of the common
stock is expected to be between $
and $ per share. We intend to
apply for listing of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol PGEM.
We are
selling shares
of common stock. The selling stockholders named in this
prospectus have granted the underwriters an option to purchase a
maximum
of
additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments. We
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the
selling stockholders.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See
Risk factors on page 13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
|
Price to Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made against
payment in New York, New York on or
about ,
2010.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
J.P.
Morgan |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
UBS Investment Bank |
Deutsche Bank
Securities
|
|
|
|
Zelman
Partners LLC |
BB&T Capital Markets |
Stephens Inc. |
Knight/Houlihan Lokey |
,
2010.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus and any free writing prospectus we provide to you.
Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized any other person
to provide you with different information. If anyone provides
you with different or inconsistent information, you should not
rely on it. Neither we nor the underwriters are making an offer
to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or
sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information
appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on
the front cover of this prospectus or such other date stated in
this prospectus.
Table of
contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
EX-23.1 |
EX-23.2 |
i
Market and
industry data
Market data and other statistical information used throughout
this prospectus are based on independent industry publications,
government publications, reports by market research firms or
other published independent sources. Some data are also based on
good faith estimates by our management, which are derived from
their review of internal surveys, as well as the independent
sources listed above. Gary E. Robinette, our President and
Chief Executive Officer, is a member of the Policy Advisory
Board of Harvard Universitys Joint Center for Housing
Studies, and we have relied, in part, on its study for the
market and statistical information included in this prospectus.
ii
Prospectus
summary
This summary highlights material information about us and
this offering, but does not contain all of the information that
you should consider before investing in our common stock. You
should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the
Risk factors and our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus before investing. This prospectus includes
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
See Cautionary note regarding forward-looking
statements.
Unless otherwise specified or the context requires otherwise,
(i) the term Ply Gem Holdings refers to Ply Gem
Holdings, Inc.; (ii) the term Ply Gem
Industries refers to Ply Gem Industries, Inc., the
principal operating subsidiary of Ply Gem Holdings;
(iii) the terms we, us, or
our, Ply Gem and the Company
refer collectively to Ply Gem Holdings and its subsidiaries; and
(iv) the term Reorganization Transactions
refers to the transactions described in Certain
relationships and related party transactionsReorganization
transactions. The use of these terms is not intended to
imply that Ply Gem Holdings and Ply Gem Industries are not
separate and distinct legal entities.
Except as the context otherwise requires, references to
information being pro forma or on a pro forma
basis means such information is presented after giving
effect to the Reorganization Transactions, the entry into the
tax receivable agreement described in Certain
relationships and related party transactionsTax receivable
agreement, this offering and the estimated use of proceeds
from this offering. See Unaudited pro forma financial
information.
Our
company
We are a leading manufacturer of residential exterior building
products in North America, operating in two reportable segments:
(i) Siding, Fencing, and Stone and (ii) Windows and
Doors, which comprised approximately 60% and 40% of our sales,
respectively, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
These two segments produce a comprehensive product line of vinyl
siding, designer accents and skirting, vinyl fencing, vinyl and
composite railing, stone veneer and vinyl windows and doors used
in both new construction and home repair and remodeling in the
United States and Western Canada. Vinyl building products have
the leading share of sales volume in siding and windows in the
United States. We also manufacture vinyl and aluminum soffit and
siding accessories, aluminum trim coil, wood windows, aluminum
windows, vinyl and aluminum-clad windows and steel and
fiberglass doors, enabling us to bundle complementary and
color-matched products and accessories with our core products.
We believe that our comprehensive product portfolio and
geographically diverse, low cost manufacturing platform allow us
to better serve our customers and provide us with a competitive
advantage over other exterior building products suppliers. For
the year ended December 31, 2009, we had net sales of
$951.4 million, adjusted EBITDA of $116.2 million and
net loss of $76.8 million. For the three months ended
April 3, 2010, we had net sales of $204.2 million,
adjusted EBITDA of $12.4 million and net income of
$54.1 million as compared to net sales of
$182.8 million, adjusted EBITDA of $(12.5) million and
net loss of $55.5 million for the three months ended
April 4, 2009.
1
Our competitive
strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths differentiate us
from our competitors and are critical to our continued success:
|
|
|
Leading Manufacturer of Exterior Building
Products. Based on our internal estimates and
industry experience, we believe we have established leading
positions in many of our core product categories including:
No. 1 in vinyl siding in the U.S.; No. 1 in aluminum
accessories in the U.S.; No. 2 in vinyl and aluminum
windows in the U.S.; and No. 2 in windows and doors in
Western Canada. We achieved this success by developing a broad
offering of high quality products and providing superior service
to our customers. We are one of the few companies that operate a
geographically diverse manufacturing platform capable of
servicing our customers across the entire United States and
Western Canada. The scale of our operations also positions us
well as customers look to consolidate their supplier base. We
believe our broad offering of leading products, geographically
diverse manufacturing platform and long-term customer
relationships make us the manufacturer of choice for our
customers exterior building products needs.
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Product Portfolio with Strong Brand
Recognition. We offer a comprehensive portfolio of
over twenty exterior building product categories covering a full
range of price points. Our broad product line gives us a
competitive advantage over other exterior building product
suppliers who provide a narrower range of products by enabling
us to provide our customers with a differentiated value
proposition to meet their own customers needs. Our leading
brands, such as Ply
Gem®,
Mastic®
Home Exteriors,
Variform®,
Napco®,
Georgia-Pacific (which we license) and Great
Lakes®
Window, are well recognized in the industry. Many of our
customers actively support our brands and typically become
closely tied to our brands through joint marketing and training,
fostering long-term relationships under the common goal of
delivering a quality product.
|
We believe a distinguishing factor in our customers
selection of Ply Gem as a supplier is the innovation and quality
for which our brands are known. As a result, our customers
positive experience with one product or brand affords us the
opportunity to cross-sell additional products and effectively
introduce new products. Since 2007, we have successfully
implemented a more unified brand strategy to expand our
cross-selling opportunities between our siding and window
product offerings. For instance, we recently consolidated
certain window product offerings under the Ply Gem brand to
offer a national window platform to our customers, which we
believe represents a comprehensive line of new construction and
home repair and remodeling windows in the industry. With our
extensive product line breadth, industry-leading brands and
national platform, we believe we can provide our customers with
a more cost-effective, single source from which to purchase
their exterior building products.
|
|
|
Multi-Channel Distribution Network Servicing a Broad
Customer Base. We have a multi-channel distribution
network that serves both the new construction and home repair
and remodel end markets through our broad customer base of
specialty and wholesale distributors, retail home centers,
lumberyards, remodeling dealers and builders. Our multi-channel
distribution strategy has increased our sales and penetration
within these end markets, while limiting our exposure to any one
customer or channel such that our top ten customers only
accounted for approximately 36.3% of our net sales in 2009. We
believe our strategy enables us to minimize channel conflict,
reduce our reliance on any one channel and reach the greatest
number of end customers while providing us with the ability to
increase our sales and to sustain our financial performance
through economic fluctuations.
|
2
|
|
|
Balanced Exposure to New Construction and Home Repair and
Remodeling. Our products are used in new
construction and home repair and remodeling, with our
diversified product mix reducing our overall exposure to any
single sector. We operate in two reportable segments:
(i) Siding, Fencing, and Stone, which has been weighted
towards home repair and remodeling, and (ii) Windows and
Doors, which has historically focused on new construction. We
have recently begun to expand our presence in the home repair
and remodel window sector through the launch of a new series of
repair and remodel window products, focusing on the unique
requirements of this sector while leveraging our existing
customer relationships. This is one of several new initiatives
that have been well received by our customers and that
complement our established product offerings by utilizing our
national sales force to sell multiple products in our portfolio.
We believe the diversity of our end markets and products
provides us with a unique opportunity to capitalize on the
overall housing market recovery.
|
|
|
|
Highly Efficient, Low Cost Operating
Platform. Since mid-2006, we have closed or
consolidated eight plants, generating savings of over
$30 million annually, and reduced our workforce by
approximately 50%. During this time, we also invested
approximately $54 million in capital expenditures,
including new product introductions and upgrades to equipment,
facilities and technology, to continue improving our vertically
integrated manufacturing platform. For example, our multi-plant
window manufacturing platform allows us to service our customers
with less than one week lead times across a broad geographic
coverage area, providing us a competitive advantage with the
ability to operate in
just-in-time
fashion. This capability provides a unique service proposition
to our customers while allowing us to maintain minimal inventory
levels in our window product offerings. In addition, as a result
of our Polyvinyl Chloride Resin (PVC) purchasing scale (we are
one of the largest purchasers in North America based on industry
estimates), we are able to secure favorable prices, terms and
input availability through various cycles.
|
Through our strong cost controls, vertically-integrated
manufacturing platform, continued investment in technology and
significant purchasing scale, we have improved efficiency and
safety in our manufacturing facilities while reducing fixed
costs to approximately 21% of our total cost structure, which
provides significant operating leverage as the housing market
recovers. Furthermore, our manufacturing facilities are among
the safest in all of North America with three of them having
received the highest federal
and/or state
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
safety award and rating. We believe that we have one of the most
efficient and safest operating platforms in the exterior
building products industry, helping to drive our profitability.
|
|
|
Proven Track Record of Acquisition Integration and Cost
Savings Realization. Our five acquisitions since early
2004 have enhanced our geographic diversity, expanded our
product offerings and enabled us to enter new product
categories. Most recently, our acquisition of United Stone
Veneer (now branded Ply Gem Stone) in 2008 enabled us to enter
the stone veneer product category, which is one of the fastest
growing categories of exterior cladding products. We have
maintained a disciplined focus on integrating new businesses,
rather than operating them separately, and have created
meaningful synergies as a result. Through facility and headcount
rationalizations, strategic sourcing and other manufacturing
improvements, we have permanently eliminated over
$50 million in aggregate costs. We view our ability to
identify, execute and integrate acquisitions as one of our core
strengths and expect that this initial public offering will
significantly improve our financial position and flexibility,
enabling us to lead the continued consolidation of the exterior
building products industry.
|
3
|
|
|
Strong Management Team with Significant
Ownership. We are led by a committed senior
management team that has an average of over 20 years of
relevant industry experience. Our current senior management,
with financial and advisory support from affiliates of
CI Capital Partners LLC, has successfully transformed Ply
Gem from operating as a holding company with a broad set of
brand offerings to an integrated business model under the Ply
Gem brand, positioning our Company to grow profitably and
rapidly as the market recovers. As of April 3, 2010, after
giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions (assuming a
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus)), members of our
management team held common stock and stock awards representing
approximately % of the shares of
our Company, which will decline
to % upon completion of this
initial public offering.
|
Our business
strategy
We are pursuing the following business and growth strategies:
|
|
|
Capture Growth Related to Housing Market
Recovery. As a leading manufacturer of exterior
building products, we intend to capitalize on the recovery in
new construction and home repair and remodeling. The 2009 level
of 441,000 single family housing starts was approximately 60%
below the 50 year average, representing a significant
opportunity for growth as activity returns to historical levels.
Furthermore, we believe that the underinvestment in homes during
the recent recession and the overall age of the
U.S. housing stock will drive significant future spending
for home repair and remodeling.
|
We expect current and new homeowners purchases to focus on
including or replacing items that provide the highest return on
investment, have positive energy efficiency attributes and
provide potential cost savings. Our broad product offering
addresses expected demand growth from all of these key trends,
through our balanced exposure to the new construction and home
repair and remodel end markets, diverse price points, the high
recovery value for home improvements derived from our core
product categories and the ability to provide products that
qualify for many of the energy efficiency rebate and tax
programs currently in effect or under consideration.
|
|
|
Continued Increase of Market Penetration. We
intend to increase the market penetration of our siding, fencing
and stone products and our window and door products by
leveraging the breadth of our product offering and broad
geographical footprint to serve customers across North America.
Additionally, our continued investments in product innovation
and quality, coupled with strong customer service, further
enhance our ability to capture increased sales in each of our
core product categories. For example, based on our internal
estimates and industry experience, we believe that we have
increased our penetration of the U.S. vinyl siding end
market and that in 2009 we accounted for approximately 33% of
total unit sales as compared to approximately 29% in 2008. In
addition, we believe that we have increased our share of total
unit sales of U.S. vinyl and aluminum windows for new
construction from approximately 17% in 2008 to 22% in 2009. In
2010, we will be introducing a new line of vinyl windows under
our Ply Gem brand as well as under our Mastic Home
Exteriors brand, historically associated with vinyl siding
products, that will be marketed and sold by our vinyl siding
sales force, a first for Ply Gem. We believe that this
demonstrates the substantial opportunity across our product
categories to continue to cross-sell and bundle products,
thereby increasing revenues from our existing channel partners
and industry relationships. We expect to build upon the
approximately $285 million in product share gains we
achieved in
|
4
|
|
|
2008 and 2009, and as the market recovers from its current low
levels we expect to further enhance our leading positions.
|
|
|
|
Expand Brand Coverage and Product
Innovation. We will continue to increase the value
of the Ply Gem brands by introducing new product categories for
our customers and by developing innovative new products within
our existing product categories. For example, we have developed
a complete series of window products under the Ply Gem brand to
target the higher margin home repair and remodeling window end
market. Furthermore, our recent addition of stone veneer to our
product offering in the Siding, Fencing, and Stone segment
provides existing siding customers with access to the fastest
growing category of exterior cladding products.
|
Our new products frequently receive industry recognition, as
evidenced by our Ply Gem Mira aluminum-clad wood window, which
was an International Builders Show Product Pick in 2008.
In addition, our Cedar Discovery designer accent product and our
Ovation vinyl siding product were both named one of the top 100
products by leading industry publications. The result of our
commitment to product development and innovation has been
demonstrated in the $85 million of incremental annualized
sales that we recognized from new products introduced in 2008
and 2009.
|
|
|
Drive Operational Leverage and Further
Improvements. While we reduced our production
capacity during the past several years, we have retained the
flexibility to bring back idled lines, facilities and/or
production shifts in order to increase our production as market
conditions improve. This incremental capacity can be selectively
restarted, providing us with the ability to match increasing
customer demand levels as the housing market returns to
historical levels of approximately one million or more single
family housing starts without the need for significant capital
investment. In our Windows and Doors segment, where we have
historically focused on new construction, we believe that our
new window products for home repair and remodeling will be able
to drive increased volumes through these manufacturing
facilities and enhance operating margins.
|
Over the past several years, we have significantly improved our
manufacturing cost structure; however, there are opportunities
for further improvements. We believe that the continued
expansion of lean manufacturing and vertical integration in our
manufacturing facilities, along with the further consolidation
of purchases of key raw materials, supplies and services will
continue to provide us with cost advantages compared to our
competitors. In addition, the integration of our sales and
marketing efforts across our product categories provides an
ongoing opportunity to significantly improve our customer
penetration and leverage the strength of our brands.
Furthermore, we have centralized many back office functions into
our corporate office in Cary, North Carolina and believe that
additional opportunities remain. We believe all of these factors
should drive continued growth in profitability while improving
our cash flow and capital efficiency.
Building products
end markets
Demand for exterior building products, including siding,
fencing, stone, windows and doors, is primarily driven by the
construction of new homes and the repair and remodeling of
existing homes, which are affected by changes in national and
local economic and demographic conditions, employment levels,
availability of financing, interest rates, consumer confidence
and other economic factors.
5
New
construction
New construction in the United States experienced strong growth
from the early 1990s to 2006, with housing starts increasing at
a compounded annual growth rate of 3.8%. However, from 2006 to
2009, single family housing starts declined 70% according to the
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). While
the industry has experienced a period of severe correction and
downturn, management believes that the long-term economic
outlook for new construction in the United States is favorable
and supported by an attractive interest rate environment and
strong demographics, as new household formations and increasing
immigration drives demand for starter homes. According to the
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, net new
households between 2010 and 2020 are expected to be between
12.5 million units and 14.8 million units, with the
low end of the range equal to net new housing units achieved
between 1995 and 2005. Strong demographics and interest rates on
home loans at historically low levels are stimulants for demand
in the United States for new construction. According to the NAHB
April 23, 2010 forecast, annual single family housing
starts are expected to increase by 25.3% and 52.3% in 2010 and
2011, respectively. In addition, new construction in Canada is
expected to benefit from similar demand stimulants as new
construction in the United States, such as strong demographic
trends and historically low interest rate levels. According to
the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation
(CMHC), housing starts in Alberta, Canada are
estimated to increase by approximately 18.5% and 19.4% in 2010
and 2011, respectively, demonstrating the recovery in new
construction in Western Canada.
Home repair
and remodeling
Since the early 1990s and through 2006, demand for home repair
and remodeling products in the United States increased at a
compounded annual growth rate of 4.3%, according to the
U.S. Census Bureau, as a result of strong economic growth,
low interest rates and favorable demographics. However,
beginning in 2007 the ability for homeowners to finance repair
and remodeling expenditures, such as replacement windows or
vinyl siding, has been negatively impacted by a general
tightening of lending requirements by financial institutions and
the significant decrease in home values, which limited the
amount of home equity against which homeowners could borrow.
Management believes that expenditures for home repair and
remodeling products are also affected by consumer confidence
that declined during 2009 due to general economic conditions and
increased unemployment levels. Although certain aspects of the
federal stimulus plan enacted in early 2009, such as energy
saving tax credits and Homestar, may encourage some consumers to
make home improvements, including the replacement of older
windows with newer more energy-efficient windows, management
believes that these favorable measures could be offset during
2010 by the effects of high unemployment, limited availability
of consumer financing and lower consumer confidence levels.
However, management believes the long-term economic outlook of
the demand for home repair and remodeling products in the United
States is favorable and supported by the move towards more
energy-efficient products, recent underinvestment in home
maintenance and repair and aging housing stock.
6
Risks associated
with our business
Our business is subject to numerous risks, which are highlighted
in the section entitled Risk factors.
These risks represent challenges to the successful
implementation of our strategy and the growth of our business.
Some of these risks are:
|
|
|
Downturns in the home repair and remodeling and new
construction sectors or the economy and the availability of
consumer credit could adversely impact our end users and lower
the demand for, and pricing of, our products, which in turn
could cause our net sales and net income to decrease.
|
|
|
|
We face competition from other exterior building products
manufacturers and alternative building materials. If we are
unable to compete successfully, we could lose customers and our
sales could decline.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the costs and availability of raw materials,
especially PVC resin and aluminum, can decrease our profit
margin by increasing our costs.
|
|
|
|
Because we depend on a core group of significant
customers, our sales, cash flows from operations and results of
operations may decline if our key customers reduce the amount of
products that they purchase from us.
|
|
|
|
Our business is seasonal and can be affected by inclement
weather conditions that could affect the timing of the demand
for our products and cause reduced profit margins when such
conditions exist.
|
|
|
|
As of April 3, 2010, on an adjusted basis after
giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions and this
offering, we would have had approximately
$ million of indebtedness
outstanding. The significant amount of our indebtedness may
limit the cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of
our business.
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service
all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions
to satisfy our obligations under such indebtedness, which may
not be successful. We may also be unable to generate sufficient
cash to make required capital expenditures.
|
For a discussion of these and other risks you should consider
before making an investment in our common stock, see the section
entitled Risk factors beginning on
page 13.
Our principal
stockholders
After giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions (assuming
a public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus)), affiliates of,
and companies managed by, CI Capital Partners LLC (CI
Capital Partners), including Caxton-Iseman (Ply Gem), L.P.
and Caxton-Iseman (Ply Gem) II, L.P. (collectively, the CI
Partnerships), will beneficially own
approximately % of our common
stock. Upon completion of this offering, after giving effect to
the Reorganization Transactions (assuming a public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the estimated public offering price range set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus)), the CI Partnerships are
expected to beneficially own
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock, or % if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
7
CI Capital Partners is a leading private equity investment firm
specializing in leveraged buyouts of middle-market companies
located primarily in North America. Since its inception, CI
Capital Partners investment activities have been managed
by Frederick Iseman and Steven Lefkowitz who have invested
together for 17 years. CI Capital Partners senior
investment professionals have 59 years of collective
experience at CI Capital Partners.
Reorganization
transactions
In connection with this offering, we will merge with our parent
corporation and engage in a series of transactions that will
convert the outstanding subordinated debt and preferred stock of
our parent corporation into common equity and result in a single
class of our common stock outstanding.
Currently, Ply Gem Prime Holdings, Inc. (Ply Gem
Prime) owns 100% of our capital stock. Immediately prior
to the closing of this offering, Ply Gem Prime will merge with
and into Ply Gem Holdings, with Ply Gem Holdings being the
surviving entity. In the reorganization merger, we will issue a
total
of shares
of our common stock, representing %
of our outstanding common stock after giving effect to this
offering. In the reorganization merger, all of the preferred
stock of Ply Gem Prime will be converted into a number of shares
of our common stock based on the initial public offering price
of our common stock and the liquidation value of and the maximum
dividend amount in respect of the preferred stock. The holders
of common stock of Ply Gem Prime will receive an aggregate
number of shares of our common stock equal to the difference
between
and the number of shares of our common stock issued to the
holders of preferred stock of Ply Gem Prime. Based on an assumed
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), in the
reorganization merger, holders of preferred stock of Ply Gem
Prime will receive an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock and holders of common stock of Ply Gem Prime
will receive an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock.
Finally, in connection with the reorganization merger, options
to purchase shares of common stock of Ply Gem Prime will be
converted into options to purchase shares of our common stock
with adjustments to the number of shares and per share exercise
prices. See Certain relationships and related party
transactions Reorganization transactions.
Corporate
information
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on
January 23, 2004. Our principal executive offices are
located at 5020 Weston Parkway, Suite 400, Cary, North
Carolina 27513. Our telephone number is
(919) 677-3900.
Our website is www.plygem.com. Information contained on our
website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
8
The
offering
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding before this offering |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. |
|
Common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering |
|
shares. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be $ million, after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds to us
(i) to redeem or repurchase a portion of our outstanding
indebtedness and (ii) to pay transaction fees and other
expenses. |
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our common
stock by the selling stockholders if the underwriters exercise
their option to purchase additional shares from the selling
stockholders. |
|
|
|
See Use of proceeds. |
|
NYSE symbol |
|
PGEM. |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should read the Risk factors section of
this prospectus for a discussion of factors that you should
consider carefully before deciding to invest in our common stock. |
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering
excludes shares
that are subject to options granted pursuant to the Ply Gem
Prime Holdings, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 2004
Option Plan) as
of ,
2010 at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share
and shares
reserved for issuance under our 2010 Equity Award Plan (and
together with the 2004 Option Plan, the Equity
Plans). See Executive compensation.
Unless we indicate otherwise, all information in this prospectus:
|
|
|
assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their option to
purchase from the selling stockholders up
to shares
of our common stock to cover over-allotments;
|
|
|
assumes a public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
estimated public offering price range set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus); and
|
|
|
gives effect to the Reorganization Transactions.
|
9
Summary
historical and pro forma consolidated financial data of Ply Gem
Holdings, Inc.
The summary historical consolidated financial data presented
below for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2009 have been derived from, and should be
read together with, our audited consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary historical consolidated statement of
operations data for the three month periods ended April 3,
2010 and April 4, 2009 and the balance sheet data as of
April 3, 2010 have been derived from the Ply Gem Holdings
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and
have been prepared on the same basis as our audited financial
statements. In the opinion of management, the Ply Gem Holdings
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include
all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position and results of operations in these periods.
The results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative
of the results that can be expected for the full year or any
future period.
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction
with Capitalization, Unaudited pro
forma financial information, Selected
historical consolidated financial data,
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations and our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
204,205
|
|
|
$
|
182,751
|
|
|
$
|
951,374
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,019
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,546
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
167,308
|
|
|
|
169,691
|
|
|
|
749,841
|
|
|
|
980,098
|
|
|
|
1,083,153
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33,806
|
|
|
|
40,962
|
|
|
|
141,772
|
|
|
|
155,388
|
|
|
|
155,963
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
207,908
|
|
|
|
215,559
|
|
|
|
911,264
|
|
|
|
1,605,136
|
|
|
|
1,260,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
(32,808
|
)
|
|
|
40,110
|
|
|
|
(430,117
|
)
|
|
|
102,649
|
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
Interest expense(2)
|
|
|
(34,007
|
)
|
|
|
(33,756
|
)
|
|
|
(135,514
|
)
|
|
|
(138,015
|
)
|
|
|
(99,698
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt(2)
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
60,634
|
|
|
|
(66,587
|
)
|
|
|
(94,718
|
)
|
|
|
(568,426
|
)
|
|
|
8,616
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
6,532
|
|
|
|
(11,049
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
(69,951
|
)
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common
stockholders per common share
|
|
$
|
541.02
|
|
|
$
|
(555.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(767.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,984.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
49.82
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(5)
|
|
$
|
12,357
|
|
|
$
|
(12,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
116,215
|
|
|
$
|
96,095
|
|
|
$
|
176,016
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
7,807
|
|
|
|
16,569
|
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
|
13,896
|
|
|
|
56,271
|
|
|
|
61,765
|
|
|
|
54,067
|
|
Annual single family housing starts(6)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Selected Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,844
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(3,028
|
)
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
(7,835
|
)
|
|
|
(11,487
|
)
|
|
|
(56,407
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
38,950
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
|
(17,528
|
)
|
|
|
78,233
|
|
|
|
(15,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 3, 2010
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma(4)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,011,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
926,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We adopted the recognition and
disclosure requirements in 2007 and the measurement provisions
in 2008 of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R) (now included in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
715, CompensationRetirement Benefits). On January 1,
2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (now included in ASC 740, Income
Taxes). In addition, we elected to change our method of
accounting for a portion of our inventory in 2008 from the
last-in, first out (LIFO) method to the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. |
|
(2)
|
|
During the three months ended
April 3, 2010, we separately classified a non-cash gain on
extinguishment in connection with the redemption of our 9%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (the 9% Senior
Subordinated Notes). During the year ended December 31, 2008, we
classified extinguishment losses arising from $14.0 million of
non-cash deferred financing costs associated with previous term
debt, $6.8 million for a prepayment premium and
$6.8 million of bank amendment fees as interest
expense. |
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the Reorganization
Transactions and the change in the Companys capital
structure prior to the completion of this offering. |
The following details the computation of the pro forma
earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
For the Year
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(76,752)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma weighted average common share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Ply Gem Prime Holdings common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Ply Gem Prime Holdings preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited basic pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock effect of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited diluted pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The summary pro forma financial
data are based upon available information and certain
assumptions as discussed in the notes to the unaudited financial
information presented under Unaudited pro forma financial
information. The summary pro forma financial data are for
informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what
our results of operations |
11
|
|
|
|
|
or financial position actually
would have been if each such transaction had occurred on the
dates specified above, nor does this data purport to represent
the results of operations for any future period. |
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA means net income
(loss) plus interest expense (net of interest income), provision
(benefit) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization,
non-cash gain on extinguishment of debt, non-cash foreign
currency gain/(loss), amortization of non-cash write-off of the
portion of excess purchase price from acquisitions allocated to
inventories, restructuring and integrations costs, customer
inventory buybacks, impairment charges and management fees paid
under our advisory agreement with an affiliate of the CI
Partnerships. Other companies may define adjusted EBITDA
differently and, as a result, our measure of adjusted EBITDA may
not be directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA of other
companies. Management believes that the presentation of adjusted
EBITDA included in this prospectus provides useful information
to investors regarding our results of operations because it
assists both investors and management in analyzing and
benchmarking the performance and value of our business. We have
included adjusted EBITDA because it is a key financial measure
used by management to (i) assess our ability to service our
debt and/or incur debt and meet our capital expenditure
requirements; (ii) internally measure our operating
performance; and (iii) determine our incentive compensation
programs. In addition, our $175.0 million senior secured
asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL
Facility) has certain covenants that apply ratios
utilizing this measure of adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Despite the importance of this
measure in analyzing our business, measuring and determining
incentive compensation and evaluating our operating performance,
as well as the use of adjusted EBITDA measures by securities
analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies,
adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you
should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP); nor is
adjusted EBITDA intended to be a measure of liquidity or free
cash flow for our discretionary use. Some of the limitations of
adjusted EBITDA are: |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for
capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements to
service interest or principal payments under our 11.75% senior
secured notes due 2013 (the Senior Secured Notes),
our 13.125% senior subordinated notes due 2014 (the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes) or the ABL
Facility;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect income tax payments we are required to make; and
|
|
|
|
Although
depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets
being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced
in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements.
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA included in this
prospectus should be considered in addition to, and not as a
substitute for, net earnings in accordance with U.S. GAAP as a
measure of performance in accordance with U.S. GAAP. You are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on adjusted
EBITDA. |
The following table presents our calculation of adjusted
EBITDA reconciled to net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net(2)
|
|
|
33,954
|
|
|
|
33,691
|
|
|
|
135,303
|
|
|
|
137,398
|
|
|
|
97,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
6,532
|
|
|
|
(11,049
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
(69,951
|
)
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
|
13,896
|
|
|
|
56,271
|
|
|
|
61,765
|
|
|
|
54,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash gain on extinguishment of debt(2)
|
|
|
(98,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on currency transaction
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
(3,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash charge of purchase price allocated to inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring/integration expense
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
10,859
|
|
|
|
10,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer inventory buyback
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees(8)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
12,357
|
|
|
$
|
(12,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
116,215
|
|
|
$
|
96,095
|
|
|
$
|
176,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Single family housing starts
data furnished by NAHB forecast (as of April 23,
2010). |
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Gives effect to the
Reorganization Transactions, the creation of liabilities in
connection with entering into the tax receivable agreement
described in Certain relationships and related party
transactionsTax receivable agreement, this offering
and the application of the net proceeds from this offering as if
such transactions took place on April 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
After the completion of this
offering, the advisory agreement with an affiliate of the CI
Partnerships will be terminated and management fees will no
longer be paid. |
12
Risk
factors
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risks. In
addition to the other information in this prospectus, you should
carefully read and consider the risk factors set forth below
before deciding to invest in our common stock. Any of the
following risks could adversely affect our business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity. The market price
of our common stock could decline if one or more of these risks
and uncertainties develop into actual events, causing you to
lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. Certain
statements in Risk factors are forward-looking
statements. See Cautionary note regarding forward-looking
statements.
Risks associated
with our business
Downturns in
the home repair and remodeling and new construction sectors or
the economy and the availability of consumer credit could
adversely impact our end users and lower the demand for, and
pricing of, our products, which in turn could cause our net
sales and net income to decrease.
Our performance is dependent to a significant extent upon the
levels of home repair and remodeling and new construction
spending, which declined significantly in 2009 as compared to
2008 and are affected by such factors as interest rates,
inflation, consumer confidence, unemployment and the
availability of consumer credit.
Our performance is also dependent upon consumers having the
ability to finance home repair and remodeling projects
and/or the
purchase of new homes. The ability of consumers to finance these
purchases is affected by such factors as new and existing home
prices, homeowners equity values, interest rates and home
foreclosures, which in turn could result in a tightening of
lending standards by financial institutions and reduce the
ability of some consumers to finance home purchases or repair
and remodeling expenditures. In fact, it is estimated that as of
May 2010, 23% of all U.S. home mortgages were
underwater, whereby the homes worth is less than the
amount owed by the homeowner on the mortgage. Recent trends,
including declining home values, increased home foreclosures and
tightening of credit standards by lending institutions, have
negatively impacted the home repair and remodeling and the new
construction sectors. If these credit market trends continue,
our net sales and net income may be adversely affected.
We face
competition from other exterior building products manufacturers
and alternative building materials. If we are unable to compete
successfully, we could lose customers and our sales could
decline.
We compete with other national and regional manufacturers of
exterior building products. Some of these companies are larger
and have greater financial resources than we do. Accordingly,
these competitors may be better equipped to withstand changes in
conditions in the industries in which we operate and may have
significantly greater operating and financial flexibility than
we do. These competitors could take a greater share of sales and
cause us to lose business from our customers. Additionally, our
products face competition from alternative materials: wood,
metal, fiber cement and masonry in siding, and wood in windows.
An increase in competition from other exterior building products
manufacturers and alternative building materials could cause us
to lose our customers and lead to decreases in net sales.
13
Changes in the
costs and availability of raw materials, especially PVC resin
and aluminum, can decrease our profit margin by increasing our
costs.
Our principal raw materials, PVC resin and aluminum, have been
subject to rapid price changes in the past. While we have
historically been able to substantially pass on significant PVC
resin and aluminum cost increases through price increases to our
customers, our results of operations for individual quarters can
be and have been hurt by a delay between the time of PVC resin
and aluminum cost increases and price increases in our products.
While we expect that any significant future PVC resin and
aluminum cost increases will be offset in part or whole over
time by price increases to our customers, we may not be able to
pass on any future price increases.
Certain of our
customers have been expanding and may continue to expand through
consolidation and internal growth, which may increase their
buying power, which could materially and adversely affect our
revenues, results of operations and financial
position.
Certain of our important customers are large companies with
significant buying power. In addition, potential further
consolidation in the distribution channels could enhance the
ability of certain of our customers to seek more favorable
terms, including pricing, for the products that they purchase
from us. Accordingly, our ability to maintain or raise prices in
the future may be limited, including during periods of raw
material and other cost increases. If we are forced to reduce
prices or to maintain prices during periods of increased costs,
or if we lose customers because of pricing or other methods of
competition, our revenues, operating results and financial
position may be materially and adversely affected.
Because we
depend on a core group of significant customers, our sales, cash
flows from operations and results of operations may decline if
our key customers reduce the amount of products that they
purchase from us.
Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 36.3% of our
net sales in the year ended December 31, 2009. Our largest
customer, BlueLinx, distributes our vinyl siding and accessories
through multiple channels within its building products
distribution business, and accounted for approximately 8.6% of
our net sales in the first quarter of 2010 and approximately
9.2% of our net sales in each of 2009 and 2008, respectively. We
expect a small number of customers to continue to account for a
substantial portion of our net sales for the foreseeable future.
The loss of, or a significant adverse change in our
relationships with, BlueLinx or any other major customer could
cause a material decrease in our net sales.
The loss of, or a reduction in orders from, any significant
customers, losses arising from customers disputes
regarding shipments, fees, merchandise condition or related
matters, or our inability to collect accounts receivable from
any major retail customer could cause a decrease in our net
income and our cash flow. In addition, revenue from customers
that have accounted for significant revenue in past periods,
individually or as a group, may not continue, or if continued,
may not reach or exceed historical levels in any period.
14
Our business
is seasonal and can be affected by inclement weather conditions
that could affect the timing of the demand for our products and
cause reduced profit margins when such conditions
exist.
Markets for our products are seasonal and can be affected by
inclement weather conditions. Historically, our business has
experienced increased sales in the second and third quarters of
the year due to increased construction during those periods.
Because much of our overhead and operating expenses are spread
ratably throughout the year, our operating profits tend to be
lower in the first and fourth quarters. Inclement weather
conditions can affect the timing of when our products are
applied or installed, causing reduced profit margins when such
conditions exist.
Increases in
the cost of labor, union organizing activity and work stoppages
at our facilities or the facilities of our suppliers could delay
or impede our production, reduce sales of our products and
increase our costs.
Our financial performance is affected by the availability of
qualified personnel and the cost of labor. As of April 3,
2010, approximately 14.7% of our employees were represented by
labor unions. We are subject to the risk that strikes or other
types of conflicts with personnel may arise or that we may
become a subject of union organizing activity. Furthermore, some
of our direct and indirect suppliers have unionized work forces.
Strikes, work stoppages or slowdowns experienced by these
suppliers could result in slowdowns or closures of facilities
where components of our products are manufactured. Any
interruption in the production or delivery of our products could
reduce sales of our products and increase our costs.
We may be
subject to claims arising from the operations of our various
businesses arising from periods prior to the dates we acquired
them. Our ability to seek indemnification from the former owners
of our subsidiaries may be limited, in which case, we would be
liable for these claims.
We have acquired all of our subsidiaries, including Ply Gem
Industries, MWM Holding, Inc.
(MWM Holding), AWC Holding Company
(AWC, and together with its subsidiaries,
Alenco), Alcoa Home Exteriors, Inc.
(AHE), Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation
(Pacific Windows) and United Stone Veneer, LLC (now
known as Ply Gem Stone), in the last several years.
We may be subject to claims or liabilities arising from the
ownership or operation of our subsidiaries for the periods prior
to our acquisition of them, including environmental liabilities.
These claims or liabilities could be significant. Our ability to
seek indemnification from the former owners of our subsidiaries
for these claims or liabilities is limited by various factors,
including the specific limitations contained in the respective
acquisition agreement and the financial ability of the former
owners to satisfy such claims or liabilities. If we are unable
to enforce our indemnification rights against the former owners
or if the former owners are unable to satisfy their obligations
for any reason, including because of their current financial
position, we could be held liable for the costs or obligations
associated with such claims or liabilities, which could
adversely affect our operating performance.
We could face
potential product liability claims relating to products we
manufacture.
Our historical product liability claims have not been material
and while management is not aware of any material product
liability issues, we do face an inherent business risk of
exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use
of any of our products results in personal
15
injury or property damage. In the event that any of our products
proves to be defective, among other things, we may be
responsible for damages related to any defective products and we
may be required to recall or redesign such products. Because of
the long useful life of our products, it is possible that latent
defects might not appear for several years. Any insurance we
maintain may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to
us or such coverage may not be adequate for liabilities actually
incurred. Further, any claim or product recall could result in
adverse publicity against us, which could cause our sales to
decline, or increase our costs.
We are
dependent on certain key personnel, the loss of whom could
materially affect our financial performance and
prospects.
Our continued success depends to a large extent upon the
continued services of our senior management and certain key
employees. To encourage the retention of certain key executives,
we have entered into various equity-based compensation
agreements with our senior executives, including
Messrs. Robinette, Poe, Wayne, Morstad, and Pigues,
designed to encourage their retention. Each member of our senior
management team has substantial experience and expertise in our
industry and has made significant contributions to our growth
and success. We do face the risk, however, that members of our
senior management may not continue in their current positions
and their loss of services could cause us to lose customers and
reduce our net sales, lead to employee morale problems
and/or the
loss of key employees, or cause disruptions to our production.
Also, we may be unable to find qualified individuals to replace
any of the senior executive officers who leave our company.
Interruptions
in deliveries of raw materials or finished goods could adversely
affect our production and increase our costs, thereby decreasing
our profitability.
Our dependency upon regular deliveries from suppliers means that
interruptions or stoppages in such deliveries could adversely
affect our operations until arrangements with alternate
suppliers could be made. If any of our suppliers were unable to
deliver materials to us for an extended period of time, as the
result of financial difficulties, catastrophic events affecting
their facilities or other factors beyond our control, or if we
were unable to negotiate acceptable terms for the supply of
materials with these or alternative suppliers, our business
could suffer. We may not be able to find acceptable
alternatives, and any such alternatives could result in
increased costs for us. Even if acceptable alternatives were
found, the process of locating and securing such alternatives
might be disruptive to our business. Extended unavailability of
a necessary raw material or finished good could cause us to
cease manufacturing one or more of our products for a period of
time.
Environmental
requirements may impose significant costs and liabilities on
us.
Our facilities are subject to numerous United States and
Canadian federal, state, provincial and local laws and
regulations relating to pollution and the protection of the
environment, including those governing emissions to air,
discharges to water, use, storage and transport of hazardous
materials, storage, treatment and disposal of waste, remediation
of contaminated sites and protection of worker health and
safety. From time to time, our facilities are subject to
investigation by governmental regulators. In addition, we have
been identified as one of many potentially responsible parties
for contamination present at certain offsite locations to which
we or our predecessors are alleged to have sent hazardous
materials for recycling or disposal. We may be held liable, or
incur fines or penalties in connection with such requirements or
liabilities
16
for, among other things, releases of hazardous substances
occurring on or emanating from current or formerly owned or
operated properties or any associated offsite disposal location,
or for newly-discovered contamination at any of our properties
from activities conducted by previous occupants. The amount of
such liability, fine or penalty may be material. Certain
environmental laws impose strict, and under certain
circumstances joint and several, liability for the cost of
addressing releases of hazardous substances upon certain classes
of persons, including site owners or operators and persons that
disposed or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at
contaminated sites.
Changes in environmental laws and regulations or in their
enforcement, the discovery of previously unknown contamination
or other liabilities relating to our properties and operations
or the inability to enforce the indemnification obligations of
the previous owners of our subsidiaries could result in
significant environmental liabilities that could adversely
impact our operating performance. In addition, we might incur
significant capital and other costs to comply with increasingly
stringent United States or Canadian environmental laws or
enforcement policies that would decrease our cash flow.
Manufacturing
or assembly realignments may result in a decrease in our
short-term earnings, until the expected cost reductions are
achieved, due to the costs of implementation.
We continually review our manufacturing and assembly operations
and sourcing capabilities. Effects of periodic manufacturing
realignments and cost savings programs could result in a
decrease in our short-term earnings until the expected cost
reductions are achieved. Such programs may include the
consolidation and integration of facilities, functions, systems
and procedures. Such actions may not be accomplished as quickly
as anticipated and the expected cost reductions may not be
achieved or sustained.
We rely on a
variety of intellectual property rights. Any threat to, or
impairment of, these rights could cause us to incur costs to
defend these rights.
As a company that manufactures and markets branded products, we
rely heavily on trademark and service mark protection to protect
our brands. We also have issued patents and rely on copyright
protection for certain of our technologies. These protections
may not adequately safeguard our intellectual property and we
may incur significant costs to defend our intellectual property
rights, which may harm our operating results. There is a risk
that third parties, including our current competitors, will
infringe on our intellectual property rights, in which case we
would have to defend these rights. There is also a risk that
third parties, including our current competitors, will claim
that our products infringe on their intellectual property
rights. These third parties may bring infringement claims
against us or our customers, which may harm our operating
results.
Increases in
fuel costs could cause our cost of products sold to increase and
net income to decrease.
Increases in fuel costs can negatively impact our cost to
deliver our products to our customers and thus increase our cost
of products sold. If we are unable to increase the selling price
of our products to our customers to cover any increases in fuel
costs, net income may be adversely affected.
17
Declines in
our business conditions may result in an impairment of our
tangible and intangible assets which could result in a material
non-cash charge.
A decrease in our market capitalization, including a short-term
decline in stock price, or a negative long-term performance
outlook, could result in an impairment of our tangible and
intangible assets which results when the carrying value of the
our assets exceed their fair value. In 2007 our other intangible
assets suffered an impairment and in 2008 our goodwill suffered
an impairment. Additional impairment charges could occur in
future periods.
The
significant amount of our indebtedness may limit the cash flow
available to invest in the ongoing needs of our
business.
As of April 3, 2010, on an adjusted basis after giving
effect to the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, we
would have had approximately
$ million of indebtedness
outstanding, including $65.0 million of outstanding
borrowings under the ABL Facility.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences. For example,
it could:
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to interest and principal payments on our
indebtedness, reducing the availability of our cash flow for
other purposes, such as capital expenditures, acquisitions and
working capital;
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business, the industry in which we operate and the
general economy;
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
less debt;
|
|
|
expose us to fluctuations in the interest rate environment
because the interest rates of our ABL Facility are at variable
rates; and
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
|
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects
and ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.
The terms of
our debt covenants could limit how we conduct our business and
our ability to raise additional funds.
The agreements that govern the terms of our debt, including the
indentures that govern the Senior Secured Notes and the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the credit agreement
that governs the ABL Facility, contain covenants that restrict
our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
incur and guarantee indebtedness or issue equity interests of
restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
repay subordinated indebtedness prior to its stated maturity;
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on or redeem or
repurchase our stock;
|
|
|
issue capital stock;
|
|
|
make certain investments or acquisitions;
|
|
|
create liens;
|
18
|
|
|
sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies;
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with stockholders and affiliates;
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; and
|
|
|
pay dividends, distributions or other payments from our
subsidiaries.
|
These restrictions may affect our ability to grow our business
and take advantage of market and business opportunities or to
raise additional debt or equity capital.
In addition, under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability
is less than the greater of (a) 15% of the lesser of
(i) the commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and
(b) $20.0 million, we will be required to satisfy and
maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio not less than 1.1 to 1.0.
Our ability to meet the required fixed charge coverage ratio can
be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure
you that we will meet this ratio. A breach of any of these
covenants under the ABL Facility or the indentures governing our
Senior Secured Notes or our 13.125% Senior Subordinated
Notes could result in a default under the ABL Facility or the
indentures. An event of default under any of our debt agreements
would permit some of our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed
from them to be due and payable and, in some cases, proceed
against the collateral securing such indebtedness.
Moreover, the ABL Facility provides the lenders considerable
discretion to impose reserves or availability blocks, which
could materially impair the amount of borrowings that would
otherwise be available to us. There can be no assurance that the
lenders under the ABL Facility will not impose such actions
during the term of the ABL Facility and further, were they to do
so, the resulting impact of this action could materially and
adversely impair our liquidity.
We may be
unable to generate sufficient cash to service all of our
indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy
our obligations under such indebtedness, which may not be
successful. We may also be unable to generate sufficient cash to
make required capital expenditures.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our
debt obligations and to make capital expenditures depends on our
financial condition and operating performance, which is subject
to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to
financial, business and other factors. We will not be able to
control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in
the industry in which we operate and competitive pressures. We
cannot assure you that we will maintain a level of cash flows
from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay or
refinance our indebtedness, including the Senior Secured Notes,
the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes or our indebtedness
under our ABL Facility, or make required capital expenditures.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we and our subsidiaries could face
substantial liquidity problems and may be forced to reduce or
delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital
or restructure or refinance our indebtedness.
In addition, if we do not have, or are unable to obtain,
adequate funds to make all necessary capital expenditures when
required, or if the amount of future capital expenditures are
materially in excess of our anticipated or current expenditures,
our product offerings may become dated, our productivity may
decrease and the quality of our products may decline, which, in
turn, could reduce our sales and profitability.
19
Our income tax
net operating loss carryovers may be limited and our results of
operations may be adversely impacted.
We have substantial deferred tax assets related to net operating
losses (NOLs) for United States federal and state
income tax purposes, which are available to offset future
taxable income. As a result, we project that the U.S. cash
tax rate will be reduced from the federal statutory rate and
state rate as a result of approximately $154.1 million of
gross NOLs for federal purposes and $204.4 million of gross
state NOLs. Our ability to utilize the NOLs may be limited as a
result of certain events, such as insufficient future taxable
income prior to expiration of the NOLs or annual limits imposed
under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), or by state law, as a result of
a change in control. A change in control is generally defined as
a cumulative change of more than 50 percentage points in
the ownership positions of certain stockholders during a rolling
three year period. Changes in the ownership positions of certain
stockholders could occur as the result of stock transactions by
such stockholders
and/or by
the issuance of stock by us. Such limitations may cause us to
pay income taxes earlier and in greater amounts than would be
the case if the NOLs were not subject to such limitations.
Should we determine that it is likely that our recorded NOL
benefits are not realizable, we would be required to reduce the
NOL tax benefits reflected on our consolidated financial
statements to the net realizable amount by establishing a
valuation reserve and recording a corresponding charge to
earnings. Conversely, if we are required to reverse any portion
of the accounting valuation against our U.S. deferred tax
assets related to our NOLs, such reversal could have a positive
effect on our financial condition and results of operations in
the period in which it is recorded.
In addition, upon the closing of this offering, we intend to
enter into a tax receivable agreement with an entity controlled
by our current stockholders (the Tax Receivable
Entity). This tax receivable agreement will generally
provide for the payment by us to the Tax Receivable Entity of
85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal,
state and local income tax or franchise tax that we actually
realize in periods after this offering as a result of
(i) NOL carryovers from periods (or portions thereof)
ending before January 1, 2010, (ii) deductible
expenses attributable to the transactions related to this
offering and (iii) deductions related to imputed interest
deemed to be paid by us as a result of this tax receivable
agreement. See Certain relationships and related party
transactionsTax receivable agreement.
We will be
required to pay an affiliate of our current stockholders for
certain tax benefits we may claim, and the amounts we may pay
could be significant.
The amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable
agreement will vary depending upon a number of factors,
including the amount and timing of the taxable income we
generate in the future and the tax rate then applicable, our use
of NOL carryovers and the portion of our payments under the tax
receivable agreement constituting imputed interest.
The payments we will be required to make under the tax
receivable agreement could be substantial. We expect that, as a
result of the amount of the NOL carryovers from prior periods
(or portions thereof) and the deductible expenses attributable
to the transactions related to this offering, assuming no
material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn
sufficient taxable income to realize in full the potential tax
benefit described above, future payments under the tax
receivable agreement, in respect of the federal and state NOL
carryovers, will be approximately
$ million and will be paid
within the next five years. These amounts reflect
20
only the cash savings attributable to current tax attributes
resulting from the NOL carryovers. It is possible that future
transactions or events could increase or decrease the actual tax
benefits realized and the corresponding tax receivable agreement
payments from these tax attributes.
In addition, although we are not aware of any issue that would
cause the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
to challenge the benefits arising under the tax receivable
agreement, the Tax Receivable Entity will not reimburse us for
any payments previously made if such benefits are subsequently
disallowed, except that excess payments made to the Tax
Receivable Entity will be netted against payments otherwise to
be made, if any, after our determination of such excess. As a
result, in such circumstances, we could make payments under the
tax receivable agreement that are greater than our actual cash
tax savings and may not be able to recoup those payments, which
could adversely affect our liquidity.
Finally, because we are a holding company with no operations of
our own, our ability to make payments under the tax receivable
agreement is dependent on the ability of our subsidiaries to
make distributions to us. The ABL Facility and the indentures
governing our Senior Secured Notes and our 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to
make distributions to us, which could affect our ability to make
payments under the tax receivable agreement. To the extent that
we are unable to make payments under the tax receivable
agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and
will accrue interest until paid, which could adversely affect
our results of operations and could also affect our liquidity in
periods in which such payments are made.
In addition, the tax receivable agreement provides that, upon
certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business
combinations or certain other changes of control, our or our
successors obligations with respect to tax benefits would
be based on certain assumptions, including that we or our
successor would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize
the NOL carryovers covered by the tax receivable agreement. As a
result, upon a change of control, we could be required to make
payments under the tax receivable agreement that are greater
than or less than the specified percentage of our actual cash
tax savings.
Risks related to
this offering and our common stock
We are
controlled by the CI Partnerships whose interest in our business
may be different than yours, and certain statutory provisions
afforded to stockholders are not applicable to us.
After giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions and this
offering, the CI Partnerships will own
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock (or % if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment in full) based on an
assumed public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). Prior to
the consummation of this offering, we will enter into an amended
and restated stockholders agreement with the CI Partnerships and
certain of our current and former members of management and
their related parties. Under the stockholders agreement, the CI
Partnerships will be initially entitled to nominate a majority
of the members of our board of directors and all of the parties
to the stockholders agreement have agreed to vote their shares
of our common stock as directed by the CI Partnerships. See
ManagementBoard structure and
Certain relationships and related party
transactionsStockholders agreement for
additional details on the composition of our board of directors
and the rights of the CI Partnerships under the stockholders
agreement.
21
Accordingly, the CI Partnerships will be able to exercise
significant influence over our business policies and affairs. In
addition, the CI Partnerships can control any action requiring
the general approval of our stockholders, including the election
of directors, the adoption of amendments to our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and the approval of mergers or sales of
substantially all of our assets. The concentration of ownership
and voting power of the CI Partnerships may also delay, defer or
even prevent an acquisition by a third party or other change of
control of our company and may make some transactions more
difficult or impossible without the support of the CI
Partnerships, even if such events are in the best interests of
minority stockholders. The concentration of voting power among
the CI Partnerships may have an adverse effect on the price of
our common stock.
In addition, we have opted out of section 203 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which we refer
to as the Delaware General Corporation Law, which,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits a publicly held
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination
transaction with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the interested stockholder became such unless the
transaction fits within an applicable exemption, such as board
approval of the business combination or the transaction which
resulted in such stockholder becoming an interested stockholder.
Therefore, after the
lock-up
period expires, the CI Partnerships are able to transfer control
of our company to a third party by transferring their common
stock, which would not require the approval of our board of
directors or our other stockholders.
For additional information regarding the share ownership of, and
our relationship with, the CI Partnerships, you should read the
information under the headings Principal and selling
stockholders and Certain relationships and
related party transactions.
As a
controlled company within the meaning of the
NYSEs corporate governance rules, we will qualify for, and
intend to rely on, exemptions from certain NYSE corporate
governance requirements. As a result, our stockholders may not
have the same degree of protection as that afforded to
stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the
NYSEs corporate governance requirements.
Following this offering, we will be a controlled
company within the meaning of the NYSEs corporate
governance rules as a result of the ownership position and
voting rights of the CI Partnerships upon completion of this
offering. A controlled company is a company of which
more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual,
group or another company. As a controlled company we may elect
not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance rules that
would otherwise require our board of directors to have a
majority of independent directors and our Compensation and
Nominating and Governance Committees to be comprised entirely of
independent directors. Accordingly, our stockholders will not
have the same protection afforded to stockholders of companies
that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance
requirements and the ability of our independent directors to
influence our business policies and affairs may be reduced.
See ManagementControlled company.
Our directors
who have relationships with the CI Partnerships may have
conflicts of interest with respect to matters involving our
Company.
Following this offering, three of our eight directors will be
affiliated with the CI Partnerships. These persons will have
fiduciary duties to both us and the CI Partnerships. As a
result, they may have real or apparent conflicts of interest on
matters affecting both us and the CI Partnerships,
22
which in some circumstances may have interests adverse to ours.
In addition, as a result of the CI Partnerships ownership
interest, conflicts of interest could arise with respect to
transactions involving business dealings between us and the CI
Partnerships including potential acquisitions of businesses or
properties, the issuance of additional securities, the payment
of dividends by us and other matters.
In addition, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation will provide that the doctrine of corporate
opportunity will not apply with respect to the Company, to
any of the CI Partnerships or certain related parties or any
directors of the Company who are employees of the CI
Partnerships or their affiliates in a manner that would prohibit
them from investing in competing businesses or doing business
with our customers. To the extent they invest in such other
businesses, the CI Partnerships may have differing interests
than our other stockholders.
There has been
no prior public market for our common stock and the trading
price of our common stock may be adversely affected if an active
trading market in our common stock does not develop. Our stock
price may be volatile, and you may be unable to resell your
shares at or above the offering price or at all.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock, and an active trading market may not develop or be
sustained upon the completion of this offering. We cannot
predict the extent to which investor interest will lead to the
development of an active trading market in shares of our common
stock or whether such a market will be sustained. The initial
public offering price of the common stock offered in this
prospectus was determined through our negotiations with the
underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price of
the common stock after this offering. The market price of our
common stock after this offering will be subject to significant
fluctuations in response to, among other factors, variations in
our operating results and market conditions specific to our
industry.
Future sales
of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause
our stock price to fall significantly even if our business is
profitable.
Upon the completion of this offering, after giving effect to the
Reorganization Transactions (assuming a public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
estimated public offering price range set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus)), we will have outstanding shares of
common stock. Of these shares, the shares of common stock
offered in this prospectus will be freely tradable without
restriction in the public market, unless purchased by our
affiliates. We expect that the
remaining shares
of common stock will become available for resale in the public
market as shown in the chart below. Our officers, directors and
the holders of substantially all of our outstanding shares of
common stock have signed
lock-up
agreements pursuant to which they have agreed not to sell,
transfer or otherwise dispose of any of their shares for a
period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus,
subject to extension in the case of an earnings release or
material news or a material event relating to us. The
underwriters may, in their sole discretion and without notice,
release all or any portion of the common stock subject to
lock-up
agreements. The underwriters are entitled to waive the
underwriter
lock-up
provisions at their discretion prior to the expiration dates of
such lock-up
agreements.
23
Immediately following the consummation of this offering, our
shares of common stock will become available for resale in the
public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Date of availability for resale
into the public market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Upon the effectiveness of this prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
180 days after the date of this prospectus, of which
approximately are
subject to holding period, volume and other restrictions under
Rule 144
|
|
|
As restrictions on resale end, the market price of our common
stock could drop significantly if the holders of these
restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as
intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more
difficult for us to raise additional funds through future
offerings of our common stock or other securities. Following
this offering, we intend to file a registration statement under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act)
registering shares of our common stock reserved for issuance
under our Equity Plans, and we will enter into a registration
rights agreement under which we will grant demand and piggyback
registration rights to the CI Partnerships and certain members
of management.
See Shares available for future sale for
a more detailed description of the shares that will be available
for future sale upon completion of this offering.
Because the
initial public offering price per common share is substantially
higher than our book value per common share, purchasers in this
offering will immediately experience a substantial dilution in
net tangible book value.
Purchasers of our common stock will experience immediate and
substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share from
the initial public offering price per share. After giving effect
to the Reorganization Transactions, the sale of
the shares
of common stock we have offered under this prospectus and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us, and the application of the net
proceeds therefrom, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
value as
of ,
2010, would have been
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock. This
represents an immediate dilution in pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value of $ per share
to new investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this
offering. See Dilution for a calculation of
the dilution that purchasers will incur.
We do not
intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, and, because
we are a holding company, we may be unable to pay
dividends.
For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to
finance our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors
and will be dependent on then-existing conditions, including our
financial condition and results of operations, capital
requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and
other factors that our board of directors considers relevant.
Furthermore, because we are a holding company with no operations
of our own, any dividend payments would depend on the cash flow
of our subsidiaries. The ABL Facility and the indentures
governing our Senior Secured Notes and our 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes limit the amount of distributions our
subsidiaries can make to us and the purposes for which
distributions can be made. In addition, Delaware law may
24
impose requirements that may restrict our ability to pay
dividends to holders of our common stock. Accordingly, we may
not be able to pay dividends even if our board of directors
would otherwise deem it appropriate. See
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operationsLiquidity and capital
resources and Description of capital
stockCapital stockCommon stock. For the
foregoing reasons, you will not be able to rely on dividends to
receive a return on your investment.
Provisions in
our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent our acquisition by a
third party.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
by-laws, which we intend to adopt prior to the completion of
this offering, will contain several provisions that may make it
more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire control
of us without the approval of our board of directors. These
provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger,
acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction
that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a
premium over the market price for their common stock. The
provisions include, among others:
|
|
|
provisions relating to creating a board of directors that is
divided into three classes with staggered terms;
|
|
|
provisions relating to the number and election of directors, the
appointment of directors upon an increase in the number of
directors or vacancy and provisions permitting the removal of
directors only for cause and with a
662/3%
stockholder vote;
|
|
|
provisions requiring a
662/3%
stockholder vote for the amendment of certain provisions of our
certificate of incorporation and for the adoption, amendment or
repeal of our by-laws;
|
|
|
provisions barring stockholders from calling a special meeting
of stockholders or requiring one to be called;
|
|
|
elimination of the right of our stockholders to act by written
consent;
|
|
|
provisions that set forth advance notice procedures for
stockholders nominations of directors and proposals for
consideration at meetings of stockholders; and
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to designate one or more
series of preferred stock and issue shares of preferred stock
without stockholder approval.
|
For more information, see Description of capital
stock. The provisions of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and by-laws and the ability of our
board of directors to create and issue a new series of preferred
stock or a stockholder rights plan could discourage potential
takeover attempts and reduce the price that investors might be
willing to pay for shares of our common stock in the future
which could reduce the market price of our stock.
Failure to
maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting
could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results
and stock price.
Maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and is
important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If we are
unable to maintain adequate internal controls, our business and
operating results could be harmed. The requirements of
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and the related rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), require,
among other things, our management to assess annually
25
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. In addition, our independent registered public
accounting firm will be required to issue a report on our
internal control over financial reporting beginning with our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2011. As of and for the
period ended April 4, 2009, management concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and that
we had a material weakness in internal control over financial
reporting related to the accounting for income taxes. We believe
that we remediated this deficiency as of December 31, 2009.
In the future, we may identify deficiencies that we may be
unable to remedy before the requisite deadline for those
reports. Also, our auditors have not yet conducted an audit of
our internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to
remediate material weaknesses noted by us or our independent
registered public accounting firm or to implement required new
or improved controls or difficulties encountered in their
implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting
obligation or result in material misstatements in our financial
statements. If our management or our independent registered
public accounting firm were to conclude in their reports that
our internal control over financial reporting was not effective,
investors could lose confidence in our reported financial
information, and the trading price of our common stock could
decrease significantly. Failure to comply with Section 404
of Sarbanes-Oxley could potentially subject us to sanctions or
investigations by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority or other regulatory authorities.
26
Cautionary
note regarding forward-looking statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements.
These statements relate to future events or our future financial
performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, expect,
plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict, potential
or continue, the negative of such terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions.
Actual events or results may differ materially.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility
for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking
statements. All written and oral forward-looking statements made
in connection with this prospectus that are attributable to us
or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the Risk factors and other
cautionary statements included in this prospectus. We are under
no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after
the date of this prospectus to conform such statements to actual
results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by
federal securities laws.
There can be no assurance that other factors will not affect the
accuracy of these forward-looking statements or that our actual
results will not differ materially from the results anticipated
in such forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to
identify all such factors, factors which could cause actual
results to differ materially from those estimated by us include,
but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
downturns in the home repair and remodeling and new construction
sectors or the economy and the availability of consumer credit;
|
|
|
competition from other exterior building products manufacturers
and alternative building materials;
|
|
|
changes in the costs and availability of raw materials;
|
|
|
consolidation and further growth of our customers;
|
|
|
loss of, or a reduction in orders from, any of our significant
customers;
|
|
|
inclement weather conditions;
|
|
|
increases in the cost of labor, union organizing activity and
work stoppages at our facilities or the facilities of our
suppliers;
|
|
|
claims arising from the operations of our various businesses
prior to our acquisitions;
|
|
|
products liability claims relating to the products we
manufacture;
|
|
|
loss of certain key personnel;
|
|
|
interruptions in deliveries of raw materials or finished goods;
|
|
|
environmental costs and liabilities;
|
|
|
manufacturing or assembly realignments;
|
|
|
threats to, or impairments of, our intellectual property rights;
|
27
|
|
|
increases in fuel costs;
|
|
|
material non-cash impairment charges;
|
|
|
our significant amount of indebtedness;
|
|
|
covenants in the ABL Facility and the indentures governing the
Senior Secured Notes and the 13.125% Senior Subordinated
Notes;
|
|
|
limitations on our NOLs and payments under the tax receivable
agreement to our current stockholders;
|
|
|
failure to generate sufficient cash to service all of our
indebtedness and make capital expenditures;
|
|
|
control by the CI Partnerships;
|
|
|
compliance with certain corporate governance requirements;
|
|
|
certain of our directors relationships with the CI Partnerships;
|
|
|
lack of a prior public market for our common stock and
volatility of our stock price;
|
|
|
future sales of our common stock in the public market;
|
|
|
substantial dilution in net tangible book value;
|
|
|
our dividend policy;
|
|
|
provisions in our charter and by-laws; and
|
|
|
failure to maintain internal controls over financial reporting.
|
These and other factors are more fully discussed in the
Risk factors and Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations sections and elsewhere in this prospectus.
These risks could cause actual results to differ materially from
those implied by forward-looking statements in this prospectus.
28
Use of
proceeds
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be $ million, after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. This estimate is based on an assumed offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the estimated public offering price range set forth on the
cover of this prospectus).
The following table sets forth the estimated sources and uses of
funds in connection with this offering and the other
transactions described below as if they had occurred on
April 3, 2010. Actual amounts may vary. See also
Unaudited pro forma financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of funds (in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of funds (in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered hereby, net of underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Redeem or repurchase existing debt(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees and expenses(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total uses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We intend to use a portion of the
proceeds from this offering to redeem or repurchase a portion of
our Senior Secured Notes and our 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes. The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at a
rate of 11.75% per annum and mature on June 15, 2013. The
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes bear interest at a rate
of 13.125% per annum and mature on July 15, 2014. The
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes were issued on
January 11, 2010 and the proceeds from the issuance of such
notes were used to redeem a portion of our 9% Senior
Subordinated Notes and to pay related costs and expenses. For a
description of the terms of the Senior Secured Notes and the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes, see
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operationsLiquidity and capital
resources11.75% Senior Secured Notes due
2013 and 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes
(i) $ million of
estimated expenses associated with this offering and (ii) a
termination fee equal to
$ million payable to an
affiliate of the CI Partnerships in connection with the
termination of an advisory agreement.
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $ per share (the midpoint of
the estimated public offering price range set forth on the cover
of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the amount of
proceeds from this offering available to us by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us.
Prior to their final application, we may hold any net proceeds
in cash or invest them in liquid short- and medium-term
securities.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our common
stock by the selling stockholders if the underwriters exercise
their option to purchase shares from the selling stockholders.
Dividend
policy
We have not paid any dividends since our inception in 2004. For
the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to
finance our business. Any future determination to pay dividends
will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be
dependent upon then-existing conditions, including our financial
condition and results of operations, capital requirements,
contractual restrictions (including restrictions contained in
the ABL Facility and the indentures governing our Senior Secured
Notes and our 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes), business
prospects and other factors that our board of directors
considers relevant.
29
Capitalization
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of April 3, 2010:
|
|
|
on an actual basis, and
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis, giving effect to the following
transactions as if they occurred on April 3, 2010:
|
(i) the Reorganization Transactions;
(ii) the creation of liabilities in connection with
entering into the tax receivable agreement;
(iii) the sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the estimated public offering price range set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus) after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us; and
(iv) the application of the net proceeds of this offering
as described in Use of proceeds.
You should read the following table in conjunction with
Unaudited pro forma financial information,
Selected historical consolidated financial
data, Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of
operations and our consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 3, 2010
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABL Facility(1)
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
11.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2013(2)
|
|
|
725,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount on $700.0 million 11.75% Senior
Secured Notes due 2013(2)
|
|
|
(4,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount on $25.0 million 11.75% Senior
Secured Notes due 2013 issued October 23, 2009(2)
|
|
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014(3)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount on $150.0 million 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014(3)
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
926,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
324,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(469,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
782,947
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Borrowings under the ABL
Facility are limited to the lesser of the borrowing base, as
defined therein, or $175.0 million, after giving effect to
an amendment to the ABL Facility on July 16, 2009.
Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes. As of
April 3, 2010, we had approximately $103.3 million of
contractual availability and approximately $63.5 million of
borrowing base availability under the ABL Facility, reflecting
$65.0 million of borrowings outstanding and approximately
$6.7 million of letters of credit. |
|
(2)
|
|
The Senior Secured Notes have a
face value of $725.0 million, but were offered at an
original discount of $11.5 million. |
|
(3)
|
|
The 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes have a face value of $150.0 million, but
were offered at an original discount of
$4.3 million. |
30
Dilution
If you invest in our common stock, you will be diluted to the
extent the initial public offering price per share of our common
stock exceeds the pro forma net tangible book value per share of
our common stock immediately after this offering. Dilution
results from the fact that the per share offering price of the
common stock is substantially in excess of the book value per
share attributable to the shares of common stock held by
existing equity holders.
Our pro forma net tangible book value as
of ,
2010 was approximately
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock. Pro
forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of
our pro forma tangible net worth, or total tangible assets less
total liabilities, divided
by shares
of our common stock outstanding as of that date, after giving
effect to the Reorganization Transactions and the creation of
liabilities in connection with entering into the tax receivable
agreement.
After giving effect to (i) the issuance and sale
of shares
of our common stock sold by us in this offering and our receipt
of approximately $ million in
net proceeds from such sale, based on an assumed public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the estimated public offering price range set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus) after deducting the underwriting
discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us and
(ii) the application of such net proceeds as discussed
under Use of proceeds, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share as
of ,
2010 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share. This amount
represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book
value of $ to existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible
book value of $ per share to new
investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this
offering. Dilution per share is determined by subtracting the
pro forma net tangible book value per share as adjusted for this
offering from the amount of cash paid by a new investor for a
share of our common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value is
not affected by the sale of shares of our common stock offered
by the selling stockholders if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option. The following table illustrates the per
share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as
of ,
2010 before giving effect to the tax receivable agreement
|
|
$
|
|
|
Effect of the tax receivable agreement
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share before the change
attributable to new investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
new investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after
this offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $ per share (the midpoint of
the estimated public offering price range set forth in the cover
page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) our pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value by
$ ,
the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share
after this offering by $ and the
dilution per share to new investors by
$ , assuming the number of shares
31
offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
The following table presents on the same pro forma basis as
of ,
2010 the differences between the total consideration paid to us
and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders
and by new investors purchasing ordinary shares in this
offering, before deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us (amounts in thousands,
except percentages and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
price
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foregoing tables do not include outstanding options to
purchase an aggregate
of shares
of common stock under our Equity Plans. See
Shares available for future
saleOptions/equity awards. As
of ,
2010, after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions,
there
were options
outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share pursuant to the 2004
Option Plan. To the extent that any of these options are
exercised, there would be further dilution to new investors. If
all of these options had been exercised as
of ,
2010, pro forma net tangible book value per share would have
been $ and total dilution per
share to new investors, on a pro forma basis, would have been
$
or %.
32
Unaudited pro
forma consolidated financial information
The historical financial information of Ply Gem Holdings for the
year ended December 31, 2009 was derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical financial
information of Ply Gem Holdings as of and for the three month
period ended April 3, 2010 was derived from our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical
financial information of Ply Gem Prime as of December 31,
2009, and for the year then ended, and as of April 3, 2010,
and for the three months then ended, are unaudited. There are no
historical operating results for Ply Gem Prime since it is a
holding company with no independent operating assets or
liabilities. For financial reporting purposes, the consolidated
operating assets and liabilities of Ply Gem Prime were the same
as Ply Gem Holdings as of December 31, 2009 and for all
previous years since inception.
The Reorganization Transactions include the merger of Ply Gem
Holdings with its parent company, Ply Gem Prime, which will
ultimately result in the conversion of Ply Gem Primes
common stock, preferred stock and long-term debt due to related
parties into shares of Ply Gem Holdings common stock. See
Certain relationships and related party
transactionsReorganization transactions for
further details of the Reorganization Transactions. The pro
forma consolidated financial information reflects the
consolidation of Ply Gem Prime and Ply Gem Holdings and also
gives effect to the Reorganization Transactions and certain
transactions that will occur in connection with this offering.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data as of
April 3, 2010 gives effect to the following transactions as
if they occurred on April 3, 2010: (i) the
Reorganization Transactions, (ii) the creation of
liabilities in connection with entering into the tax receivable
agreement; (iii) the sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us; (iv) the application of the net proceeds of
this offering as described in Use of
proceeds; (v) the write-off of
approximately $ million of
debt issuance costs and the related tax benefit of approximately
$ million attributable to the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the Senior Secured Notes
redeemed
and/or
repurchased with the proceeds from this offering; (vi) a
$ charge related to call premiums,
if applicable, associated with the redemption
and/or
repurchase of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the
Senior Secured Notes; and (vii) the recognition of deferred
compensation charges of approximately
$ million, net of tax impact
of $ million, in connection
with the completion of this offering.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations
data for the three months ended April 3, 2010 and the year
ended December 31, 2009 gives effect to the following
transactions as if they occurred on January 1, 2009:
(i) the Reorganization Transactions; (ii) the sale of
shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us; and (iii) the application of the
net proceeds of this offering to redeem and/or repurchase the
Senior Secured Notes.
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
we will record the following one-time charges in our
consolidated statement of operations at the time of the
respective
33
transactions: (i) the write-off of approximately
$ million of unamortized debt
issuance costs, $ million of
debt discounts and $ million
of call premiums, if applicable, net of tax impact of
$ million, attributable to
the redemption
and/or
repurchase of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the
Senior Secured Notes with a portion of the proceeds from this
offering; and (ii) the recognition of deferred compensation
charges of approximately
$ million, net of tax impact
of $ million, in connection
with the completion of this offering. Because these charges are
non-recurring in nature, we have not given effect to these
transactions in the pro forma consolidated statements of
operations. However, these items are reflected as pro forma
adjustments to accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance
sheet as of April 3, 2010.
The presentation of the unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information is prepared in conformity with
Article 11 of Regulation
S-X. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information has been
prepared by our management and is based on our historical
financial statements and the assumptions and adjustments
described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information below.
We based the pro forma adjustments on available information and
on assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. See Notes to unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial information for a discussion of
assumptions made. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
information is presented for informational purposes and is based
on managements estimates. The unaudited pro forma
consolidated statements of operations do not purport to
represent what our results of operations actually would have
been if the transactions set forth above had occurred on the
dates indicated or what our results of operations will be for
future periods.
34
Ply Gem Holdings,
Inc.
Unaudited pro
forma consolidated balance sheet
as of
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ply Gem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
adjustments
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ply Gem
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
after
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
adjustments
|
|
reorganization
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
114,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
41,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
25,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
42,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
|
109,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
21,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
277,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
35,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
264,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
304,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(167,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
|
136,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
167,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
393,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Ply Gem Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
143,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
597,074
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
143,831
|
|
|
597,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,011,301
|
|
$
|
(143,831
|
)
|
$
|
143,831
|
|
$
|
1,011,301
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
68,099
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
68,099
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and taxes
|
|
|
92,231
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
160,330
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
65,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt due to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,287
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
926,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,343
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
324,174
|
|
|
114,281
|
|
|
(324,174
|
)
|
|
114,281
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c),(g)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(469,643
|
)
|
|
(517,956
|
)
|
|
469,643
|
|
|
(517,956
|
)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
(268,650
|
)
|
|
143,831
|
|
|
(268,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,011,301
|
|
$
|
(143,831
|
)
|
$
|
143,831
|
|
$
|
1,011,301
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma financial information.
35
Ply Gem Holdings,
Inc.
Unaudited pro
forma consolidated statement of operations
for the three
months ended April 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ply Gem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ply Gem
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
204,205
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,205
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
167,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33,806
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
207,908
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gain
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(34,007
|
)
|
|
|
(3,007
|
)(1)
|
|
|
9,848
|
(2)
|
|
|
(27,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
9,848
|
(1)
|
|
|
(9,848
|
)(2)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in subsidiarys income
|
|
|
60,634
|
|
|
|
5,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiarys income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,102
|
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
60,634
|
|
|
|
59,343
|
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
65,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,532
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
57,811
|
|
|
$
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,811
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma financial information.
36
Ply Gem Holdings,
Inc.
Unaudited pro
forma consolidated statement of operations
for the year
ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ply Gem
|
|
|
Ply Gem Prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
951,374
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
951,374
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
749,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
141,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
911,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
40,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gain
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(135,514
|
)
|
|
|
(11,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before equity in loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(94,718
|
)
|
|
|
(11,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
|
76,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(94,718
|
)
|
|
|
(87,935
|
)
|
|
|
76,752
|
|
|
|
(105,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,752
|
|
|
$
|
(87,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma financial information.
37
Notes to
unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information
Pro forma
adjustments
Balance sheet
as of April 3, 2010
(a) Reflects the income tax benefit resulting from the
write-off of debt issuance costs, debt discounts and call
premiums, if applicable, paid in connection with debt repayment
with the proceeds from this offering.
(b) Reflects the write-off of approximately
$ million of debt issuance
costs attributable to the outstanding 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes and Senior Secured Notes redeemed
and/or
repurchased with the proceeds from this offering.
(c) Reflects adjustments to record a liability primarily
related to our tax receivable agreement with the Tax Receivable
Entity. Under this tax receivable agreement, we are required to
pay the Tax Receivable Entity 85% of the amount of cash savings,
if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or
franchise tax that we actually realize in periods after this
offering as a result of (i) net operating loss carryovers
from periods (or portions thereof) ending before January 1,
2010, (ii) deductible expenses attributable to the
transactions related to this offering and (iii) deductions
related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result
of this tax receivable agreement.
(d) Reflects the application of a portion of the proceeds
from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses, to redeem
and/or
repurchase a portion of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated
Notes and the Senior Secured Notes.
(e) Reflects the Reorganization Transactions, including the
conversion of preferred stock and long-term debt due to related
parties of Ply Gem Prime into shares of common stock of Ply Gem
Holdings and the exchange of common stock of Ply Gem Prime for
common stock of Ply Gem Holdings. The Reorganization
Transactions will create one class of stock outstanding, which
will be the common stock of Ply Gem Holdings.
(f) Reflects the recognition of a charge, net of the
related income tax benefit, attributable to the following:
|
|
|
The write-off of approximately
$ million of unamortized debt
issuance costs, $ million of
debt discounts and $ million
of call premiums, if applicable, net of tax impact of
$ million, attributable to
the redemption
and/or
repurchase of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the
Senior Secured Notes with a portion of the proceeds from this
offering; and
|
|
|
The recognition of deferred compensation charges of
approximately $ million, net
of tax impact of $ million,
in connection with the completion of this offering.
|
(g) Reflects the offering
of shares
of common stock in exchange for proceeds of
$ million, a portion of which
will be utilized to repurchase
and/or
redeem the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and the Senior
Secured Notes.
38
For the three
months ended April 3, 2010
(1) These adjustments reflect non-recurring adjustments for
Ply Gem Prime resulting from the debt extinguishment occurring
during the three months ended April 3, 2010. The advisory
fee paid to an affiliate of the CI Partnerships of
$1.6 million, interest expense of $3.0 million related
to the long-term debt due to related parties of Ply Gem Prime,
the interest income of $9.8 million paid to a related
party, and the state income tax expense of $1.5 million
related to the capital gain can all be attributed to the debt
extinguishment in the quarter ended April 3, 2010. These
items will not recur after the Reorganization Transactions and
occurred only during the three month period ended April 3,
2010.
(2) During February 2010, the CI Partnerships contributed
approximately $218.8 million aggregate principal amount of
9% Senior Subordinated Notes to Ply Gem Holdings in
exchange for equity of Ply Gem Prime valued at approximately
$114.9 million. Prior to this $218.8 million
contribution to Ply Gem Holdings, the CI Partnerships initially
transferred the notes to Ply Gem Prime, which then transferred
the notes to Ply Gem Holdings and Ply Gem Holdings transferred
such notes to Ply Gem Industries as a capital contribution and
the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes were then cancelled. As a
result of these debt transactions, Ply Gem Holdings paid
interest to Ply Gem Prime of approximately $9.8 million.
Ply Gem Prime recorded this amount as interest income and Ply
Gem Holdings recorded this amount as interest expense. This
adjustment reflects the elimination of this interest income and
expense upon consolidation of these entities.
In addition, the interest expense related to long-term debt due
to related parties of Ply Gem Prime reflected on Ply Gem
Primes financial statements will not be recurring in the
future as the debt to which this interest relates will be
converted into outstanding common stock of Ply Gem Holdings in
the Reorganization Transactions eliminating any future interest
expense for Ply Gem Prime.
(3) Reflects the reduction of interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs as a result of the
redemption
and/or
repurchase of a portion of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated
Notes and the Senior Secured Notes with a portion of the
proceeds from this offering.
(4) Reflects the incremental provision for state and
federal income taxes as a result of the pro forma adjustments.
(5) The pro forma basic weighted average common shares
outstanding reflect the issuance of shares of common stock
issued in connection with the following transactions as if such
shares had been issued on January 1, 2010:
(i) The Reorganization Transactions;
(ii) The sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us; and
(iii) The application of the net proceeds of this offering
as described in Use of proceeds.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
ended April 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of common stock issued in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The pro forma diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
reflect the treasury stock effect of the outstanding stock
options. In connection with the Reorganization Transactions,
options to purchase shares of common stock of Ply Gem Prime will
be converted into options to purchase shares of common stock of
Ply Gem Holdings with adjustments to the number of shares and
per share exercise prices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
ended April 3,
2010
|
|
|
Pro forma basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
Treasury stock effect of outstanding options
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
For the year
ended December 31, 2009
(A) Reflects the reduction of interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs as a result of the assumed
redemption
and/or
repurchase of a portion of the Senior Secured Notes with a
portion of the proceeds from this offering.
In addition, the interest expense related to long-term debt due
to related parties of Ply Gem Prime reflected on Ply Gem
Primes financial statements will not be recurring in the
future as the debt to which this interest relates will be
converted into outstanding common stock of Ply Gem Holdings in
the Reorganization Transactions eliminating any future interest
expense for Ply Gem Prime.
(B) Reflects the incremental provision for state and
federal income taxes as a result of the pro forma adjustments.
(C) The pro forma basic and diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding reflect the issuance of shares of common
stock issued in connection with the following transactions as if
the shares had been issued on January 1, 2009:
(i) The Reorganization Transactions;
(ii) The sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the estimated public offering price range
set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us; and
(iii) The application of the net proceeds of this offering
as described in Use of proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Reorganization Transactions
|
|
|
Shares of common stock issued in this offering
|
|
|
Pro forma basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
40
Selected
historical consolidated financial data
You should read the information set forth below in
conjunction with Capitalization, Unaudited pro
forma financial information, Managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected data presented below under the captions
Selected Statements of Operations Data,
Selected Statements of Cash Flows Data and
Selected Balance Sheet Data as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and for each of the years in the three year
period ending December 31, 2008, are derived from the
consolidated financial statements of Ply Gem Holdings and
subsidiaries, which financial statements have been audited by
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008,
and for each of the years in the two year period ended
December 31, 2008, and the report thereon, are included
elsewhere in the prospectus. The selected data should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the
two year period ended December 31, 2008, the related notes
and the independent registered public accounting firms
report, which refers to a change in the Companys method of
accounting for a portion of its inventory in 2008 from the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method to the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method, the Companys adoption of the
recognition and disclosure requirements in 2007 and the
measurement provisions in 2008 of Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (now included in
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits), and the Companys
adoption of FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (now included in FASB ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes).
The selected data presented below under the captions
Selected Statements of Operations Data,
Selected Statements of Cash Flows Data and
Selected Balance Sheet Data as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009 are derived from the consolidated
financial statements of Ply Gem Holdings and subsidiaries, which
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm. The data should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related
notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The following selected historical consolidated financial data as
of and for the three month periods ended April 3, 2010 and
April 4, 2009 have been derived from, and should be read
together with, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of Ply Gem Holdings and subsidiaries included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations in these periods.
41
The selected historical consolidated financial data set forth
below is not necessarily indicative of the results of future
operations. The results of any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the full year or any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statements of Operations Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
204,205
|
|
|
$
|
182,751
|
|
|
$
|
951,374
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,019
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,546
|
|
|
$
|
1,054,468
|
|
|
$
|
838,868
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
167,308
|
|
|
|
169,691
|
|
|
|
749,841
|
|
|
|
980,098
|
|
|
|
1,083,153
|
|
|
|
829,518
|
|
|
|
645,976
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33,806
|
|
|
|
40,962
|
|
|
|
141,772
|
|
|
|
155,388
|
|
|
|
155,963
|
|
|
|
125,619
|
|
|
|
92,738
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
|
|
11,942
|
|
|
|
9,761
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
207,908
|
|
|
|
215,559
|
|
|
|
911,264
|
|
|
|
1,605,136
|
|
|
|
1,260,897
|
|
|
|
967,861
|
|
|
|
748,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
(32,808
|
)
|
|
|
40,110
|
|
|
|
(430,117
|
)
|
|
|
102,649
|
|
|
|
86,607
|
|
|
|
90,393
|
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Interest expense(2)
|
|
|
(34,007
|
)
|
|
|
(33,756
|
)
|
|
|
(135,514
|
)
|
|
|
(138,015
|
)
|
|
|
(99,698
|
)
|
|
|
(76,680
|
)
|
|
|
(57,657
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt(2)
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
60,634
|
|
|
|
(66,587
|
)
|
|
|
(94,718
|
)
|
|
|
(568,426
|
)
|
|
|
8,616
|
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
34,476
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
6,532
|
|
|
|
(11,049
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
(69,951
|
)
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
13,259
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
54,102
|
|
|
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
7,062
|
|
|
|
21,217
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax
benefit of $57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
$
|
6,976
|
|
|
$
|
21,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common
stockholders per common share
|
|
$
|
541.02
|
|
|
$
|
(555.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(767.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,984.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
49.82
|
|
|
$
|
69.76
|
|
|
$
|
212.17
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(5)
|
|
$
|
12,357
|
|
|
$
|
(12,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
116,215
|
|
|
$
|
96,095
|
|
|
$
|
176,016
|
|
|
$
|
130,052
|
|
|
$
|
118,849
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
7,807
|
|
|
|
16,569
|
|
|
|
20,017
|
|
|
|
20,318
|
|
|
|
14,742
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
|
13,896
|
|
|
|
56,271
|
|
|
|
61,765
|
|
|
|
54,067
|
|
|
|
33,816
|
|
|
|
26,125
|
|
Annual single family housing starts(6)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,844
|
|
|
$
|
53,425
|
|
|
$
|
63,910
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(3,028
|
)
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
(7,835
|
)
|
|
|
(11,487
|
)
|
|
|
(56,407
|
)
|
|
|
(432,168
|
)
|
|
|
(14,362
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
38,950
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
|
(17,528
|
)
|
|
|
78,233
|
|
|
|
(15,068
|
)
|
|
|
405,396
|
|
|
|
(34,334
|
)
|
Selected Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,659
|
|
|
$
|
17,215
|
|
|
$
|
17,063
|
|
|
$
|
58,289
|
|
|
$
|
52,053
|
|
|
$
|
48,821
|
|
|
$
|
22,173
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,011,301
|
|
|
|
1,037,855
|
|
|
|
982,033
|
|
|
|
1,104,053
|
|
|
|
1,616,153
|
|
|
|
1,649,968
|
|
|
|
1,052,798
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
926,778
|
|
|
|
1,124,433
|
|
|
|
1,100,397
|
|
|
|
1,114,186
|
|
|
|
1,031,223
|
|
|
|
1,042,894
|
|
|
|
635,776
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(143,831
|
)
|
|
|
(298,563
|
)
|
|
|
(313,482
|
)
|
|
|
(242,628
|
)
|
|
|
241,787
|
|
|
|
230,591
|
|
|
|
217,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We adopted the recognition and
disclosure requirements in 2007 and the measurement provisions
in 2008 of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R) (now included in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
715, CompensationRetirement Benefits). On January 1,
2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (now included in ASC 740, Income
Taxes). We adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(now included in ASC 718, CompensationStock
Compensation and ASC 505, Equity) on January 1, 2006.
In addition, we elected to change our method of accounting for a
portion of our inventory in 2008 from the last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method to the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. |
|
(2)
|
|
During the three months ended
April 3, 2010, we separately classified a non-cash gain on
extinguishment in connection with the redemption of the 9%
Senior Subordinated Notes. During the year ended December 31,
2008, we classified extinguishment losses arising from $14.0
million of non-cash deferred financing costs associated with
previous term debt, $6.8 million for a prepayment premium and
$6.8 million of bank amendment fees as interest
expense. |
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the Reorganization
Transactions and the change in the Companys capital
structure prior to the completion of this offering. |
The following details the computation of the pro forma
earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
For the year
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
(amounts in thousands (except per share data))
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma weighted average common share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Ply Gem Prime Holdings common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Ply Gem Prime Holdings preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited basic pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock effect of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited diluted pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The pro forma financial data are
based upon available information and certain assumptions as
discussed in the notes to the unaudited financial information
presented under Unaudited pro forma financial
information. The pro forma financial data are for
informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what
our results of operations or financial position actually would
have been if each such transaction had occurred on the dates
specified above, nor does this data purport to represent the
results of operations for any future period. |
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA means net income
(loss) plus interest expense (net of interest income), provision
(benefit) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization,
non-cash gain on extinguishment of debt, non-cash foreign
currency gain/(loss), amortization |
43
|
|
|
|
|
of non-cash write-off of the
portion of excess purchase price from acquisitions allocated to
inventories, restructuring and 2006 phantom stock conversion
costs, customer inventory buybacks, impairment charges,
cumulative effect of accounting change and management fees paid
under our advisory agreement with an affiliate of the CI
Partnerships. Other companies may define adjusted EBITDA
differently and, as a result, our measure of adjusted EBITDA may
not be directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA of other
companies. Management believes that the presentation of adjusted
EBITDA included in this prospectus provides useful information
to investors regarding our results of operations because it
assists both investors and management in analyzing and
benchmarking the performance and value of our business. We have
included adjusted EBITDA because it is a key financial measure
used by management to (i) assess our ability to service our
debt and/or incur debt and meet our capital expenditure
requirements; (ii) internally measure our operating
performance; and (iii) determine our incentive compensation
programs. In addition, our ABL Facility has certain covenants
that apply ratios utilizing this measure of adjusted
EBITDA. |
|
|
|
Despite the importance of this
measure in analyzing our business, measuring and determining
incentive compensation and evaluating our operating performance,
as well as the use of adjusted EBITDA measures by securities
analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies,
adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you
should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP; nor is
adjusted EBITDA intended to be a measure of liquidity or free
cash flow for our discretionary use. Some of the limitations of
adjusted EBITDA are: |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for
capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital needs;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements to
service interest or principal payments under our Senior Secured
Notes, 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and ABL
Facility;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does
not reflect income tax payments we are required to make; and
|
|
|
|
Although
depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets
being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced
in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements.
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA included in this
prospectus should be considered in addition to, and not as a
substitute for, net earnings in accordance with U.S. GAAP
as a measure of performance in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on adjusted
EBITDA. |
The following table presents our calculation of adjusted
EBITDA reconciled to net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
$
|
6,976
|
|
|
$
|
21,217
|
|
Interest expense, net(2)
|
|
|
33,954
|
|
|
|
33,691
|
|
|
|
135,303
|
|
|
|
137,398
|
|
|
|
97,994
|
|
|
|
75,475
|
|
|
|
56,927
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
6,532
|
|
|
|
(11,049
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
(69,951
|
)
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
13,259
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
|
13,896
|
|
|
|
56,271
|
|
|
|
61,765
|
|
|
|
54,067
|
|
|
|
33,816
|
|
|
|
26,125
|
|
Non-cash gain on extinguishment of debt(2)
|
|
|
(98,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on currency transaction
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
(3,961
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
Non-cash charge of purchase price allocated to inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring/2006 phantom stock conversion expense
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
|
|
10,859
|
|
|
|
10,356
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer inventory buyback
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees(7)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
12,357
|
|
|
$
|
(12,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
116,215
|
|
|
$
|
96,095
|
|
|
$
|
176,016
|
|
|
$
|
130,052
|
|
|
$
|
118,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Single family housing starts
data furnished by NAHB forecast (as of April 23,
2010). |
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
After the completion of this
offering, the advisory agreement with an affiliate of the CI
Partnerships will be terminated and management fees will no
longer be paid. |
44
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations in
conjunction with our historical financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
following discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the
timing of events may differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements due to a number of
factors, including those set forth under Risk
factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. This historical
discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition
and results of operations does not give effect to the
Reorganization Transactions, the entry into the tax receivable
agreement, this offering and the application of the net proceeds
of this offering.
General
We are a leading manufacturer of residential exterior building
products in North America, operating in two reportable segments:
(i) Siding, Fencing, and Stone and (ii) Windows and
Doors, which comprised approximately 60% and 40% of our sales,
respectively, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
These two segments produce a comprehensive product line of vinyl
siding, designer accents and skirting, vinyl fencing, vinyl and
composite railing, stone veneer and vinyl windows and doors used
in both new construction and home repair and remodeling in the
United States and Western Canada. Vinyl building products have
the leading share of sales volume in siding and windows in the
United States. We also manufacture vinyl and aluminum soffit and
siding accessories, aluminum trim coil, wood windows, aluminum
windows, vinyl and aluminum-clad windows and steel and
fiberglass doors, enabling us to bundle complementary and
color-matched products and accessories with our core products.
We believe that our comprehensive product portfolio and
geographically diverse, low cost manufacturing platform allow us
to better serve our customers and provide us with a competitive
advantage over other exterior building products suppliers.
Ply Gem Holdings was incorporated on January 23, 2004 by
affiliates of CI Capital Partners for the purpose of acquiring
Ply Gem Industries from Nortek, Inc. (Nortek). The
Ply Gem acquisition was completed on February 12, 2004.
Prior to the Ply Gem acquisition, our business was known as the
Windows, Doors and Siding division of Nortek, where the business
operated as a holding company with a broad set of brands. Since
the Ply Gem acquisition, we have acquired five additional
businesses to complement and expand our product portfolio and
geographical diversity. After being recruited by our directors
affiliated with CI Capital Partners, Gary E. Robinette, our
President and Chief Executive Officer, joined Ply Gem in October
2006, and has employed the strategy of transitioning Ply Gem to
an integrated and consolidated business model under the Ply Gem
brand.
The following is a summary of Ply Gems acquisition history:
|
|
|
On August 27, 2004, Ply Gem acquired MWM Holding, a
manufacturer of vinyl, wood, wood-clad, composite, impact and
aluminum windows and patio doors under the name MW
Windows & Doors.
|
|
|
On February 24, 2006, Alenco, a manufacturer of aluminum
and vinyl windows and door products, was acquired by Ply Gem.
This acquisition supported our national window strategy and
today operates under common leadership with our other
U.S. window businesses.
|
45
|
|
|
On October 31, 2006, Ply Gem completed the acquisition of
Alcoa Home Exteriors, Inc. (AHE), a leading
manufacturer of vinyl siding, aluminum siding, injection molded
shutters and vinyl, aluminum and injection molded accessories.
As a result of the AHE acquisition, AHE became part of our
Siding, Fencing, and Stone Segment and operates under common
leadership with our existing siding business.
|
|
|
On September 30, 2007, Ply Gem completed the acquisition of
CertainTeed Corporations vinyl window and patio door
business, which we have named Ply Gem Pacific Windows, a leading
manufacturer of premium vinyl windows and patio doors.
|
|
|
On October 31, 2008, Ply Gem acquired substantially all of
the assets of Ply Gem Stone (formerly United Stone Veneer), a
manufacturer of stone veneer products. As a result of the Ply
Gem Stone acquisition, the Company modified the name of its
Siding, Fencing, and Railing segment to
Siding, Fencing, and Stone during 2008.
|
Prior to January 11, 2010, Ply Gem Holdings was a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Ply Gem Investment Holdings, Inc.
(Ply Gem Investment Holdings), which was a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Ply Gem Prime. On January 11,
2010, Ply Gem Investment Holdings was merged with and into Ply
Gem Prime, with Ply Gem Prime being the surviving corporation.
As a result, Ply Gem Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Ply Gem Prime. Immediately prior to the closing of this
offering, Ply Gem Prime will merge with and into Ply Gem
Holdings, with Ply Gem Holdings being the surviving entity.
We are a holding company with no operations or assets of our own
other than the capital stock of our subsidiaries. The terms of
the ABL Facility and the indentures governing the Senior Secured
Notes and the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes place
restrictions on Ply Gem Industries and its subsidiaries
ability to make certain payments and otherwise transfer assets
to us. Further, the terms of the ABL Facility place restrictions
on our ability to make certain dividend payments.
Financial
statement presentation
Net sales. Net sales represent the fixed selling
price of our products plus certain shipping charges less
applicable provisions for discounts and allowances. Allowances
include cash discounts, volume rebates and returns among others.
Cost of products sold. Cost of products sold
includes direct material and manufacturing costs, manufacturing
depreciation, third-party and in-house delivery costs and
product warranty expense.
Selling, general and administrative
expense. Selling, general and administrative expense
(SG&A expense) includes all non-product related
operating expenses, including selling, marketing, research and
development costs, information technology, restructuring, and
other general and administrative expenses.
Operating earnings (loss). Operating earnings (loss)
represents net sales less cost of products sold, SG&A
expense and amortization of intangible assets.
Comparability. All periods after the Pacific Windows
acquisition in September 2007 include the results of operations
of Pacific Windows. All periods after the Ply Gem Stone
acquisition in October 2008 include the results of operations of
Ply Gem Stone.
46
Impact of
commodity pricing
PVC resin and aluminum are major components in the production of
our products and changes in PVC resin and aluminum prices have a
direct impact on our cost of products sold. Historically, we
have been able to pass on the price increases to our customers.
The results of operations for individual quarters can be
negatively impacted by a delay between the time of raw material
cost increases and price increases that we implement in our
products, or conversely can be positively impacted by a delay
between the time of a raw material price decrease and
competitive pricing moves that we implement accordingly.
Impact of
weather
Since our building products are intended for exterior use, our
sales and operating earnings tend to be lower during periods of
inclement weather. Weather conditions in the first and fourth
quarters of each calendar year historically result in those
quarters producing significantly less sales revenue than in any
other period of the year. As a result, we have historically had
lower profits or losses in the first quarter, and reduced
profits in the fourth quarter of each calendar year due to the
weather. Our results of operations for individual quarters in
the future may be impacted by adverse weather conditions.
Critical
accounting policies
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations are based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. Certain of our accounting policies require
the application of judgments in selecting the appropriate
assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. We periodically evaluate the judgments and
estimates used for our critical accounting policies to ensure
that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for our interim
and year-end reporting requirements. These judgments and
estimates are based upon our historical experience, current
trends and information available from other sources, as
appropriate. If different conditions result compared to our
assumptions and judgments, the results could be materially
different from our estimates. Management also believes that the
five areas where different assumptions could result in
materially different reported results are 1) goodwill and
intangible asset impairment tests, 2) accounts receivable
related to estimation of allowances for doubtful accounts,
3) inventories in estimating reserves for obsolete and
excess inventory, 4) warranty reserves and 5) income
taxes. Although we believe the likelihood of a material
difference in these areas is low based upon our historical
experience, a 10% change in our allowance for doubtful accounts,
inventory reserve estimates, and warranty reserve at
December 31, 2009 would result in an approximate
$0.5 million, $0.7 million, and $4.3 million
impact on expenses, respectively. Additionally, we have included
in the discussion that follows our estimation methodology for
both accounts receivable and inventories. While all significant
policies are important to our consolidated financial statements,
some of these policies may be viewed as being critical. Our
critical accounting policies include:
Revenue Recognition. We recognize sales based upon
shipment of products to our customers net of applicable
provisions for discounts and allowances. Generally, the customer
takes title upon shipment and assumes the risks and rewards of
ownership of the product. For certain products, our customers
take title upon delivery, at which time revenue is then
recognized. Revenue includes the selling price of the product
and all shipping costs paid by the customer.
47
Revenue is reduced at the time of sale for estimated sales
returns and all applicable allowances and discounts based on
historical experience. We also provide for estimates of
warranty, bad debts, shipping costs and certain sales-related
customer programs at the time of sale. Shipping and warranty
costs are included in cost of products sold. Bad debt expense
and sales-related marketing programs are included in SG&A
expense. We believe that our procedures for estimating such
amounts are reasonable and historically have not resulted in
material adjustments in subsequent periods when the estimates
are reconciled to the actual amounts.
Accounts Receivable. We maintain an allowance for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses from the inability of our
customers to make required payments, which is provided for in
bad debt expense. We determine the adequacy of this allowance by
regularly reviewing our accounts receivable aging and evaluating
individual customers receivables, considering
customers financial condition, credit history and other
current economic conditions. If a customers financial
condition were to deteriorate which might impact its ability to
make payment, then additional allowances may be required.
Inventories. Inventories in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets are valued at the lower of cost or
market. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we elected
to conform our method of valuing our inventory to the FIFO
method from the LIFO method since over 92% of our inventory used
FIFO. We believe that the FIFO method is preferable because it
provides a better measure of the current value of its inventory
and provides a better matching of manufacturing costs with
revenues. The change resulted in the application of a single
costing method to all of our inventories. We record provisions,
as appropriate, to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to
estimated net realizable value. The process for evaluating
obsolete and excess inventory often requires subjective
judgments and estimates concerning future sales levels,
quantities and prices at which such inventory will be sold in
the normal course of business. Accelerating the disposal process
or incorrect estimates of future sales potential may cause the
actual results to differ from the estimates at the time such
inventory is disposed or sold.
Asset Impairment. We evaluate the realizability of
certain long-lived assets, which primarily consist of property
and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization,
based on expectations of undiscounted future cash flows for each
asset group. If circumstances indicate a potential impairment,
and if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is
less than the carrying amount of all long-lived assets, we would
recognize an impairment loss. A decrease in projected cash flows
due to depressed residential housing construction and remodeling
was determined to be a triggering event during 2009 and 2008.
The impairment test results did not indicate that an impairment
existed at December 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
Refer to Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for additional
information regarding long-lived assets including the level of
impairment testing, the material assumptions regarding these
impairment calculations, and the sensitivities surrounding those
assumptions.
Goodwill Impairment. We perform an annual test for
goodwill impairment during the fourth quarter of each year and
also at any other date when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of these assets may exceed
their fair value. We use the two-step method to determine
goodwill impairment. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value (Step One Analysis), we measure the
possible goodwill impairment based upon a hypothetical
allocation of the fair value estimate of the reporting unit to
all of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting
unit, including previously unrecognized intangible assets
48
(Step Two Analysis). The excess of the reporting units
fair value over the amounts assigned to its assets and
liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment
loss is recognized to the extent that a reporting units
recorded goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.
To evaluate goodwill impairment, we estimate the fair value of
reporting units considering such factors as discounted cash
flows and valuation multiples for comparable publicly traded
companies. A significant reduction in projected sales and
earnings which would lead to a reduction in future cash flows
could indicate potential impairment. Depressed residential
housing construction and remodeling was determined to be a
triggering event during the third quarter of 2008. The test
results indicated that an estimated impairment of approximately
$200.0 million existed at September 27, 2008. This
impairment was recognized within the Windows and Doors
segments operating earnings in the third quarter of 2008.
Our annual goodwill impairment test performed during the fourth
quarter of 2008 was affected by further housing market declines
as well as significant decreases in market multiples. The test
results indicated that an additional impairment of approximately
$127.8 million existed in our Windows and Doors segment at
December 31, 2008. In addition, an impairment of
approximately $122.2 million was recognized in our Siding,
Fencing, and Stone segment. These impairments were recognized in
the respective segments in the fourth quarter of 2008. Our
annual goodwill impairment test performed during the fourth
quarter of 2009 indicated no impairment. The Windows and Doors
and Siding, Fencing, and Stone reporting units exceeded their
carrying values at December 31, 2009 by approximately 26%
and 50%, respectively.
We performed the following sensitivity analysis on the reporting
unit Step One fair values as of December 31, 2009,
December 31, 2008, and September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Windows and Doors reporting unit fair value (decrease)
increase in the event of a 10% increase in the weighting of the
market multiples method
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,800
|
)
|
Estimated Siding, Fencing, and Stone reporting unit fair value
(decrease) increase in the event of a 10% increase in the
weighting of the market multiples method
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
49
A summary of the key assumptions utilized in the goodwill
impairment analysis at December 31, 2009, December 31,
2008, and September 27, 2008, as it relates to the Step One
fair values and the sensitivities for these assumptions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows and Doors
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated housing starts in terminal year
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
Terminal growth rate
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
Discount rates
|
|
|
19.0%
|
|
|
|
19.0%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
Market approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control premiums
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
|
20.0%
|
|
Sensitivities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% decrease in
the terminal year growth
|
|
$
|
11,565
|
|
|
$
|
7,937
|
|
|
$
|
26,629
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% increase in
the discount rate
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
15,876
|
|
|
|
43,331
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% decrease in
the control premium
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siding, Fencing, and Stone
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated housing starts in terminal year
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
Terminal growth rate
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
Discount rates
|
|
|
19.0%
|
|
|
|
18.0%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
Market approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control premiums
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
Sensitivities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% decrease in
the terminal year growth
|
|
$
|
23,989
|
|
|
$
|
18,330
|
|
|
$
|
38,064
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% increase in
the discount rate
|
|
|
45,248
|
|
|
|
35,659
|
|
|
|
64,261
|
|
Estimated fair value decrease in the event of a 1% decrease in
the control premium
|
|
|
7,470
|
|
|
|
5,316
|
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
50
We provide no assurance that: 1) valuation multiples will
not decline further, 2) discount rates will not increase or
3) the earnings, book values or projected earnings and cash
flows of our reporting units will not decline. We will continue
to analyze changes to these assumptions in future periods. We
will continue to evaluate goodwill during future periods and
further declines in residential housing construction and
remodeling could result in additional goodwill impairments.
Income Taxes. We utilize the asset and liability
method in accounting for income taxes, which requires that the
deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the
amounts recorded in our financial statements and the amounts
included in our federal and state income tax returns be
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The amount
recorded in our consolidated financial statements reflects
estimates of final amounts due to timing of completion and
filing of actual income tax returns. Estimates are required with
respect to, among other things, the appropriate state income tax
rates used in the various states in which we and our
subsidiaries are required to file, the potential utilization of
operating and capital loss carryforwards for both federal and
state income tax purposes and valuation allowances required, if
any, for tax assets that may not be realized in the future. We
establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return
positions are fully supportable, certain positions could be
challenged, and the positions may not be fully sustained. We
have entered into a tax sharing agreement with Ply Gem
Industries and Ply Gem Prime pursuant to which tax liabilities
for each respective party are computed on a stand-alone basis.
Our U.S. subsidiaries file unitary, combined federal income
tax returns and separate state income tax returns. Ply Gem
Canada, Inc. (Ply Gem Canada), formerly CWD Windows
and Doors, Inc., files separate Canadian income tax returns.
At December 31, 2008, we were in a net deferred tax
liability position and had sufficient taxable income from
reversing taxable temporary differences to realize the federal
deferred tax assets. We scheduled out the reversing temporary
differences associated with their deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities to reach this conclusion. Due to recent
cumulative losses accumulated by us, our management did not rely
upon projections of future taxable income in assessing the
recoverability of deferred tax assets. At December 31,
2009, we were in a full federal valuation allowance position as
we were no longer in a net deferred liability tax position and
continued to incur losses for income tax purposes. Refer to
Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information
regarding income taxes.
Purchase Accounting. Business acquisitions are
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The cost
of the acquired company is allocated to identifiable tangible
and intangible assets based on estimated fair value with the
excess allocated to goodwill.
51
Results of
operations
The following table summarizes net sales and net income (loss)
by segment and is derived from the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations included in this report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2010
|
|
|
April 4, 2009
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siding, Fencing, and Stone
|
|
$
|
117,668
|
|
|
$
|
108,460
|
|
|
$
|
577,390
|
|
|
$
|
709,432
|
|
|
$
|
828,124
|
|
Windows and Doors
|
|
|
86,537
|
|
|
|
74,291
|
|
|
|
373,984
|
|
|
|
465,587
|
|
|
|
535,422
|
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siding, Fencing, and Stone
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
(7,517
|
)
|
|
|
77,756
|
|
|
|
(75,431
|
)
|
|
|
73,560
|
|
Windows and Doors
|
|
|
(10,756
|
)
|
|
|
(21,682
|
)
|
|
|
(23,504
|
)
|
|
|
(344,140
|
)
|
|
|
36,134
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
(3,609
|
)
|
|
|
(14,142
|
)
|
|
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
|
(7,045
|
)
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows and Doors
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siding, Fencing, and Stone
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Windows and Doors
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
33,951
|
|
|
|
33,747
|
|
|
|
135,289
|
|
|
|
137,005
|
|
|
|
96,431
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
(6,532
|
)
|
|
|
11,049
|
|
|
|
17,966
|
|
|
|
69,951
|
|
|
|
(3,634
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54,102
|
|
|
$
|
(55,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(498,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth our results of operations based
on the amounts and the percentage relationship of the items
listed to net sales for the periods indicated.
This review of performance is organized by business segment,
reflecting the way we manage our business. Each business group
leader is responsible for operating results down to operating
earnings (loss). We use operating earnings as a performance
measure as it captures the income and expenses within the
management control of our business leaders. Corporate management
is responsible for making all financing decisions. Therefore,
each segment discussion focuses on the factors affecting
operating earnings, while interest expense and income taxes and
certain other unallocated expenses are separately discussed at
the corporate level.
52
Siding, Fencing,
and Stone segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
April 3, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
April 4, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
117,668
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
108,460
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
577,390
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
709,432
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
828,124
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
90,294
|
|
|
|
76.7%
|
|
|
|
95,475
|
|
|
|
88.0%
|
|
|
|
428,037
|
|
|
|
74.1%
|
|
|
|
578,850
|
|
|
|
81.6%
|
|
|
|
659,423
|
|
|
|
79.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,374
|
|
|
|
23.3%
|
|
|
|
12,985
|
|
|
|
12.0%
|
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
|
|
25.9%
|
|
|
|
130,582
|
|
|
|
18.4%
|
|
|
|
168,701
|
|
|
|
20.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
14,729
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
|
|
18,372
|
|
|
|
16.9%
|
|
|
|
63,072
|
|
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
|
75,240
|
|
|
|
10.6%
|
|
|
|
86,068
|
|
|
|
10.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
122,227
|
|
|
|
17.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
|
$
|
(7,517
|
)
|
|
|
−6.9%
|
|
|
$
|
77,756
|
|
|
|
13.5%
|
|
|
$
|
(75,431
|
)
|
|
|
−10.6%
|
|
|
$
|
73,560
|
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Ply Gem Stone acquisition, we shortened the
name of our Siding, Fencing, Railing and Decking
segment to Siding, Fencing, and Stone during 2008.
The Ply Gem Stone results were included within this segment from
October 31, 2008 forward. The other operations within this
segment remain unchanged.
Net
sales
Net sales for the three months ended April 3, 2010
increased compared to the same period in 2009 by approximately
$9.2 million, or 8.5%. The increase in net sales was driven
by improved industry wide market conditions in new construction
as single family housing starts increased favorably impacting
demand for our products. According to the U.S. Census
Bureau, fourth quarter 2009 and first quarter 2010 single family
housing starts were estimated to increase by approximately 1.5%
and 46.0% respectively from actual levels achieved in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. The increase in
net sales that resulted from improved market conditions in new
construction were partially offset by overall market softness in
repair and remodeling expenditures. According to the Joint
Center for Housing Studies of Harvard Universitys leading
indicator of remodeling activity (LIRA) index, repair and
remodeling activity declined in the first quarter of 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased
from the year ended December 31, 2008 by approximately
$132.0 million, or 18.6%. The decrease in net sales was
driven by industry wide market declines resulting from lower
single family housing starts, which negatively impacted the new
construction sector and overall softness in repair and
remodeling expenditures. These market conditions negatively
impacted demand for our products. According to the NAHB, single
family housing starts for 2009 were 441,000 units, which
represents a decline of approximately 28.4% from 2008 levels of
616,000. In addition to lower unit volume shipments, selling
prices were generally lower in 2009 as compared to 2008 due to
market pressure that resulted from lower raw material and
freight costs. The decrease in net sales that resulted from
industry wide market demand declines and lower selling prices
were partially offset by product share gains from sales to new
customers
and/or
expanded sales to existing customers from additional products or
sales in new geographical regions. As a result of our market
share gains, we believe that we outperformed the vinyl siding
industry. Our 2009 unit shipments of vinyl siding decreased
by approximately 12% as compared to the U.S. vinyl siding
industry, as summarized by the Vinyl Siding Institute, which
reported a 23% unit shipment
53
decline in 2009. As a result, we estimate that our share of
U.S. vinyl siding units shipped increased from
approximately 29% in 2008 to 33% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Additionally, our 2009 sales include
sales contributed by Ply Gem Stone which was acquired in October
2008.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased
from the year ended December 31, 2007 by approximately
$118.7 million or 14.3%. The decrease in net sales was
driven by industry wide market declines resulting from lower
single family housing starts, which negatively impacted the new
construction sector and overall softness in repair and
remodeling expenditures. These market conditions negatively
impacted demand for our products. According to the NAHB, 2008
single family housing starts declined approximately 40.5% from
actual levels achieved in 2007 with single family housing starts
declining from 1,036,000 units in 2007 to 616,000 in 2008.
The decrease in net sales that resulted from industry wide
market demand declines was partially offset by price increases
that we implemented in response to increasing raw materials and
freight costs as discussed below in cost of products sold and
sales from Ply Gem Stone.
Cost of
products sold
Cost of products sold for the three months ended April 3,
2010 decreased compared to the same period in 2009 by
approximately $5.2 million, or 5.4%. The decrease in cost
of products sold was driven by lower material cost due to the
termination of an aluminum supply agreement in early 2009, which
resulted in abnormally high aluminum material cost charged to
cost of products sold in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease
in cost of products sold was partially offset by increased sales
as discussed above. In addition, we incurred $1.3 million
less expense associated with new customers that resulted from
the buy-back, or lift-out, of our competitors product on
initial stocking orders for the three months ended April 3,
2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Gross profit
percentage for the three months ended April 3, 2010
increased from the same period in 2009 from 12.0% to 23.3%. The
improvement in gross profit percentage resulted from lower
aluminum material cost and new customer buy-back expense as
previously discussed. In addition, our gross profit percentage
improved as a result of managements initiatives to reduce
fixed expenses, including the consolidation of the majority of
the production from our vinyl siding plant in Kearney, Missouri
into our other three remaining vinyl siding plants which was
completed in the second quarter of 2009.
Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $150.8 million, or 26.1%. The decrease in
cost of products sold was primarily due to lower sales as
discussed above and decreased raw material costs, primarily PVC
resin and aluminum, as well as lower freight costs driven by
lower oil costs. We estimate that the 2009 full year average
market cost of pipe grade PVC resin and aluminum declined by
approximately 8.1% and 35.2% respectively as compared to 2008.
Gross profit percentage increased from 18.4% in 2008 to 25.9% in
2009. The improvement in gross profit percentage resulted from
decreased raw material and freight cost discussed above,
partially offset by lower selling prices. In addition, our gross
profit percentage improved as a result of managements
initiatives to reduce fixed expenses which included the closure
of the vinyl siding plant in Denison, Texas, which ceased
production in February 2008, the consolidation of the majority
of the production from our vinyl siding plant in Kearney,
Missouri into its other three remaining vinyl siding plants, and
the consolidation of our metal accessory production from our
Valencia, Pennsylvania facility into our Sidney, Ohio facility
which occurred during the later part of 2008 and early 2009. The
improvement in gross profit that resulted from managements
54
initiatives was partially offset by initial costs that were
incurred with new customers that resulted from the buy-back, or
lift-out, of our competitors product on the initial
stocking orders with our new customers which totaled
$7.4 million in 2009 as compared to $1.4 million in
2008.
Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $80.6 million or 12.2%. The decrease in cost
of products sold was due to lower sales as discussed above, but
was partially offset by higher raw material costs, primarily PVC
resin and aluminum, as well as higher freight costs driven by
higher oil costs. Gross profit percentage decreased from 20.4%
in 2007 to 18.4% in 2008. The decrease in gross profit
percentage was driven by lower unit sales volume and increased
raw material and freight costs. During 2008, we implemented
selling price increases in response to higher raw material costs
and freight costs, however, our gross profit percentage was
negatively impacted by the delay between the time of raw
material and freight cost increases and the price increases that
we implemented. We experienced market wide decreases in our raw
material costs and freight costs during the later months of
2008, which resulted in corresponding decreases in our selling
prices as a result of the lower raw material and freight costs.
Additionally, in light of current market conditions for building
products, we have adjusted the size of our workforce and reduced
our fixed overhead structure, including reductions in certain
fixed expenses related to the vinyl siding plants in Atlanta,
Georgia and Denison, Texas, which ceased production in April of
2007 and February of 2008, respectively.
SG&A
expense
SG&A expenses for the three months ended April 3, 2010
decreased compared to the same period in 2009 by approximately
$3.6 million, or 19.8%. The decrease in SG&A expense
was primarily caused by lower marketing expenses related to our
brand conversion from Alcoa Home Exteriors to Mastic Home
Exteriors during the first quarter of 2009. We reduced
administrative and other fixed expenses in light of current
market conditions and incurred lower restructuring and
integration expense which totaled approximately
$0.1 million for the first quarter of 2010 as compared to
approximately $1.2 million for the same period in 2009.
SG&A expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $12.2 million, or 16.2%. The decrease in
SG&A expense was due to lower administrative and other
fixed expenses that have been reduced in light of current market
conditions, as well as, lower restructuring and integration
expense. We incurred restructuring and integration expense of
approximately $2.9 million in 2009 as compared to
approximately $6.9 million in 2008.
SG&A expense for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $10.8 million or 12.6%. The decrease in
SG&A expenses was primarily due to lower selling and
marketing costs and other fixed expenses that have been reduced
in light of current market conditions for building products. In
addition, SG&A expense for 2007 included certain expenses
incurred to integrate the AHE acquisition into our Siding,
Fencing, and Stone segment.
Amortization
of intangible assets
Amortization expense for the three months ended April 3,
2010 was consistent with the same period in 2009.
55
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
was consistent with the year ended December 31, 2008.
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $0.5 million.
Goodwill
impairment
There were no impairment indicators which would trigger an
interim impairment test during the quarter ended April 3,
2010 or April 4, 2009.
Our annual goodwill impairment test performed during the fourth
quarter of 2009 indicated no impairment. During 2008, we
conducted our annual goodwill impairment test. As a result of
depressed residential housing construction and remodeling, we
incurred a $122.2 million impairment charge to operating
earnings during the fourth quarter of 2008 for our Siding,
Fencing, and Stone operating segment. Our annual goodwill
impairment test performed during the fourth quarter of 2007
indicated no impairment.
Windows and Doors
segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
April 3, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
April 4, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
86,537
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
74,291
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
373,984
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
465,587
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
535,422
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
77,014
|
|
|
|
89.0%
|
|
|
|
74,216
|
|
|
|
99.9%
|
|
|
|
321,804
|
|
|
|
86.0%
|
|
|
|
401,248
|
|
|
|
86.2%
|
|
|
|
423,730
|
|
|
|
79.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
9,523
|
|
|
|
11.0%
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
52,180
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
64,339
|
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
|
|
111,692
|
|
|
|
20.9%
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
15,625
|
|
|
|
18.1%
|
|
|
|
18,981
|
|
|
|
25.5%
|
|
|
|
64,579
|
|
|
|
17.3%
|
|
|
|
69,602
|
|
|
|
14.9%
|
|
|
|
62,850
|
|
|
|
11.7%
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
5.4%
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
|
11,105
|
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
11,104
|
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
327,773
|
|
|
|
70.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Intangible impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(10,756
|
)
|
|
|
−12.4%
|
|
|
|
(21,682
|
)
|
|
|
−29.2%
|
|
|
|
(23,504
|
)
|
|
|
−6.3%
|
|
|
|
(344,140
|
)
|
|
|
−73.9%
|
|
|
|
36,134
|
|
|
|
6.7%
|
|
Currency transaction gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
−0.1%
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
$
|
(911
|
)
|
|
|
−0.2%
|
|
|
$
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
Net sales for the three months ended April 3, 2010
increased compared to the same period in 2009 by approximately
$12.2 million, or 16.5%. The increase in net sales resulted
from higher demand for our window and door products due to
higher sales of our new construction window and door products
resulting from U.S. single family housing starts increases
as previously discussed. In addition, sales of our window and
door products in Western Canada were favorably impacted by
market wide increased demand that resulted from increased
housing starts in Alberta, Canada. According to the CMHC,
housing starts in Alberta, Canada were estimated to have
increased by 126.9% in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to
the same period in 2009. Our unit shipments of windows and doors
in the United States increased 8.8% in the first three months of
2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, while our unit
shipments of windows and doors in Western Canada increased by
48.9% in the first three months of 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009.
56
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased
compared to the same period in 2008 by approximately
$91.6 million, or 19.7%. The decrease in net sales was due
to lower demand for our window and door products due to lower
sales of our new construction window and door products which
were negatively impacted by market wide decreased demand that
resulted from reductions in single family housing starts in the
United States as previously discussed. In addition, sales of our
window and door products in Western Canada were negatively
impacted by market wide decreased demand that resulted from
reductions in housing starts in Alberta, Canada which were
estimated to show a decline of 30.1% in 2009 as compared to 2008
according to the CMHC. The decrease in net sales that resulted
from industry wide market demand declines in both the
U.S. and western Canadian markets were partially offset by
product share gains from sales to new customers
and/or
expanded sales to existing customers from additional products or
sales in new geographical regions. Our unit shipments of windows
and doors in the United States were down 16.8% in 2009 as
compared to 2008, while according to the NAHB, single family
housing starts for 2009 were expected to show a decline of
approximately 28.4% from actual levels achieved in 2008. Our
unit shipments of windows and doors in Western Canada were down
15.8% in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased
from the year ended December 31, 2007 by approximately
$69.8 million, or 13.0%. The decrease was due to lower
sales of our new construction window products which were
negatively impacted by market wide decreased demand that
resulted from reductions in single family housing starts as
discussed above, as well as lower demand for our repair and
remodeling windows which declined due to a slowdown in the
remodeling and replacement activity across the United States.
The decrease in sales was partially offset by the sales from
Pacific Windows which was acquired in September 2007 and price
increases that were implemented in response to increasing raw
material and freight costs as discussed below.
Cost of
products sold
Cost of products sold for the three months ended April 3,
2010 increased compared to the same period in 2009 by
approximately $2.8 million, or 3.8%. The increase in cost
of products sold was due to increased sales as discussed above.
Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from 0.1% in
2009 to 11.0% in 2010. The improvement in gross profit
percentage resulted from lower fixed manufacturing costs due to
the closure of our Hammonton, New Jersey, Phoenix, Arizona and
Tupelo, Mississippi window plants during 2009 and realigned
production within our three west coast window plants, including
the realignment of window lineal production during 2009. Also,
impacting our gross profit were the initial costs that were
incurred with new customers that resulted from the buy-back, or
lift-out, of our competitors product on the initial
stocking orders with our new customers which were
$0.0 million in 2010 as compared to $0.2 million for
2009.
Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased compared to the same period in 2008 by approximately
$79.4 million, or 19.8%. The decrease in cost of products
sold was primarily due to lower sales as discussed above and
decreased raw material costs, primarily PVC resin and aluminum,
as well as lower freight costs driven by lower oil costs as
previously discussed. Gross profit percentage increased from
13.8% in 2008 to 14.0% in 2009. The increase in gross profit
percentage resulted from lower fixed manufacturing costs that
were reduced in response to lower market demand and decreased
raw material costs, primarily PVC resin, aluminum and glass, as
well as lower freight costs driven in part by lower oil costs.
The reduction in fixed manufacturing costs resulted from the
closure of our Hammonton, New
57
Jersey, Phoenix, Arizona and Tupelo, Mississippi window plants
during 2009 and realigned production within our three west coast
window plants, including the realignment of window lineal
production during 2009. Also, impacting our gross profit results
were the initial costs that were incurred with new customers
that resulted from the buy-back, or lift-out, of our
competitors product on the initial stocking orders with
our new customers which totaled $1.0 million in 2009 as
compared to $0.5 million for 2008.
Cost of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $22.5 million, or 5.3%. The decrease in cost
of products sold was due to lower sales as discussed above, but
was partially offset by cost of products sold attributable to
Pacific Windows, which was acquired in the fourth quarter of
2007 and by higher raw material costs, primarily PVC resin and
aluminum, as well as higher freight costs driven by higher oil
costs. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased from
20.9% in 2007 to 13.8% in 2008. The decrease in gross profit
percentage was driven by lower unit sales volume, increased raw
material and freight costs which were not fully offset by
selling price increases, as well as Pacific Windows which
carried a lower gross profit margin than our other window and
door products.
SG&A expense
SG&A expenses for the three months ended April 3, 2010
decreased compared to the same period in 2009 by approximately
$3.4 million, or 17.7%. The decrease in SG&A expense
was due to lower administrative and other fixed expenses that
have been reduced in light of current market conditions. In
addition, we incurred $2.7 million lower restructuring and
integration expense for the first quarter of 2010 as compared to
the same period in 2009.
SG&A expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $5.0 million, or 7.2%. The decrease in
SG&A expense was due to lower administrative and other
fixed expenses that have been reduced in light of current market
conditions. These SG&A expense reductions were partially
offset by higher restructuring and integration expenses that
were incurred in 2009 of approximately $5.6 million as
compared to approximately $3.3 million in 2008.
SG&A expense for the year ended December 31, 2008
increased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $6.8 million, or 10.7%. The increase in
SG&A was primarily due to the addition of Pacific Windows
and reorganization expenses incurred to integrate our
U.S. window companies into one operating group. The
reorganization expenses are primarily comprised of fees paid to
third party consultants assisting with the reorganization and
integration of our U.S. window group, as well as severance
costs related to positions that have been eliminated. We believe
that the reorganization of our U.S. window group will allow
us to better serve our customers and end users, while reducing
future operating costs.
Amortization
of intangible assets
Amortization expense for the three months ended April 3,
2010 increased compared to the same period in 2009 by
approximately $1.9 million due to the change in the
estimated lives of certain tradenames. During the quarter ended
April 3, 2010, we decreased the life of certain trademarks
to three years (applied prospectively) as a result of future
marketing plans regarding the use of the trademarks.
58
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
was consistent with the amortization expense for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Amortization expense for the year ended
December 31, 2008 increased from the year ended
December 31, 2007 by approximately $2.5 million, due
to the reclassification of the tradenames intangible asset from
an indefinite lived asset to a definite lived asset.
Goodwill
impairment
There were no impairment indicators which would trigger an
interim impairment test during the quarter ended April 3,
2010 or April 4, 2009.
Our annual goodwill impairment test performed during the fourth
quarter of 2009 indicated no impairment. As a result of
depressed residential housing construction and remodeling, we
incurred a $127.8 million impairment charge to operating
earnings during the fourth quarter of 2008 for our Windows and
Doors operating segment. The $127.8 million impairment
charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2008 was in addition to
the estimated $200.0 million impairment charge to operating
earnings taken in our fiscal third quarter of 2008 for our
Windows and Doors operating segment. Our annual goodwill
impairment test performed during the fourth quarter of 2007
indicated no impairment.
Intangible
impairment
There were no impairment indicators which would trigger an
interim impairment test during the quarter ended April 3,
2010 or April 4, 2009.
We evaluated the intangible assets as of December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 and determined that there was no
impairment. We evaluated the intangible assets (tradenames) with
indefinite lives for impairment as of November 30, 2007 and
determined that there was an impairment. The impairment charge
was primarily a result of a change in the assumption of
long-term revenue growth related to the tradenames. As a result,
we wrote down those assets by approximately $4.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Currency
transaction gain (loss)
Currency transaction gain (loss) changed from a loss of
approximately $88,000 for the three months ended April 4,
2009 to a gain of approximately $104,000 for the three months
ended April 3, 2010.
Currency transaction gain (loss) changed from a loss of
approximately $0.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 to a gain of approximately
$0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Currency transaction gain (loss) changed from a gain of
approximately $4.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to a loss of approximately
$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
59
Unallocated
operating earnings, interest, and provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
|
April 4,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
$
|
(3,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,609
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,045
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
(3,609
|
)
|
|
|
(14,142
|
)
|
|
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
|
(7,045
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(33,960
|
)
|
|
|
(33,756
|
)
|
|
|
(135,328
|
)
|
|
|
(137,395
|
)
|
|
|
(97,558
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
98,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(6,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,049
|
|
|
$
|
17,966
|
|
|
$
|
69,951
|
|
|
$
|
(3,634
|
)
|
|
|
SG&A
expense
Unallocated SG&A expense include items which are not
directly attributed to or allocated to either of our reporting
segments. Such items include legal costs, corporate payroll, and
unallocated finance and accounting expenses. The unallocated
SG&A expense for the three months ended April 3, 2010
decreased by approximately $0.2 million compared to the
same period in 2009 primarily due to lower professional fees.
The SG&A expense increase of approximately
$3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
compared to December 31, 2008 was driven by the expansion
of the corporate office and centralization of back office
functions from the operating units to the corporate office
including payroll, payables, credit (US Windows), cash
application and billing.
The increase of approximately $3.5 million in expenses for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the prior
year was primarily due to higher salary and travel and
entertainment expenses due to the addition of a corporate
marketing department and one-time expenses related to the 2008
corporate office movement to Cary, North Carolina.
Amortization
of intangible assets
The amortization expense for the for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 was approximately $9,000 compared to no
amortization expense for the three months ended April 4,
2009.
The amortization expense for the year ended December 31,
2009 was approximately $21,000. There was no amortization
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Interest
expense
Interest expense for the three months ended April 3, 2010
increased by approximately $0.2 million over the same
period in 2009 due to interest of approximately
$0.5 million on the additional
60
$25.0 million of Senior Secured Notes issued in October
2009, interest of approximately $0.5 million due to the
amortization of the bond discount associated with the additional
$25.0 million of Senior Secured Notes, and an increase of
approximately $0.2 million due to a higher interest rate on
ABL borrowings, partially offset by approximately
$1.0 million of financing costs expensed as interest in
2009.
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased by approximately $2.1 million over the same
period in 2008. The decrease was due to the following:
|
|
|
a decrease of approximately $27.6 million due to interest
costs incurred in the second quarter of 2008 related to the
issuance of new debt (approximately $14.0 million deferred
financing costs associated with previous debt, approximately
$6.8 million for a prepayment premium, and approximately
$6.8 million of bank amendment fees that was subsequently
retired);
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $16.6 million due to 2009
interest of approximately $37.2 million on the
$700.0 million Senior Secured Notes issued on June 9,
2008, as compared to approximately $20.6 million of 2008
interest on our previous term loan which was repaid on
June 9, 2008;
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $1.2 million due to interest
paid on increased borrowings under the ABL Facility;
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $6.7 million of interest
charges related to the various debt financing activities which
occurred during 2009 involving third party fees; and
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $1.0 million due to higher
amortization of deferred financing costs in 2009 as compared to
2008.
|
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008
increased by approximately $39.8 million, or 40.8%, over
the same period in 2007. The increase was due to the following:
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $46.2 million due to
additional interest on the $700.0 million Senior Secured
Notes issued on June 9, 2008;
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $27.6 million due to interest
costs incurred in the second quarter of 2008 related to the
issuance of new debt (approximately $14.0 million deferred
financing costs associated with previous debt, approximately
$6.8 million for a prepayment premium, and approximately
$6.8 million of bank amendment fees that was subsequently
retired);
|
|
|
an increase of approximately $1.8 million on ABL/revolver
borrowings;
|
|
|
a decrease of approximately $34.6 million due to interest
paid in 2007 on our previous term loan which was paid off
effective June 9, 2008; and
|
|
|
a decrease of approximately $1.2 million resulting from the
reclassification of 2007 third-party financing costs from other
expense to interest expense.
|
Interest
income
Interest income for the three months ended April 3, 2010
was consistent with the same period in 2009.
61
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $0.4 million as a result of lower interest
rates in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased from the year ended December 31, 2007 by
approximately $0.7 million as a result of lower interest
rates in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Gain on
extinguishment of debt
As a result of the redemption of $141.2 million aggregate
principal amount of the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes on
February 16, 2010, we recognized a loss on extinguishment
of debt of approximately $2.2 million related predominantly
to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. As a result
of the contribution of $218.8 million aggregate principal
amount of the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes by the CI
Partnerships in exchange for equity of Ply Gem Prime valued at
approximately $114.9 million on February 12, 2010, we
recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$100.4 million including the write-off of unamortized debt
issuance costs of approximately $3.5 million. The net
$98.2 million gain on debt extinguishment was recorded
within other income (expense) separately in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the period ended
April 3, 2010.
We recognized no gain on extinguishment of debt for the years
ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Income
taxes
The income tax provision for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 increased by approximately $17.6 million
over the same period in 2009. Our pre-tax income for the quarter
ended April 3, 2010 included a $98.2 million gain on
extinguishment of debt in which the majority of this gain was
recognized during 2009 for income tax purposes. Our pre-tax loss
for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 adjusting for the
extinguishment gain was $37.6 million compared to a pre-tax
loss of $66.6 million for the quarter ended April 4,
2009. Therefore, the reason for the increase in the tax
provision relates to the favorable operating performance during
the first quarter of 2010 in which pre-tax loss improved
$29.0 million. The reason for an income tax expense despite
the pre-tax loss relates to state income taxes as well as income
taxes for Ply Gem Canada. For the quarter ended April 3,
2010, our estimated effective income tax rate for the full year
was approximately 11.4%, which varied from the statutory rate
primarily due to state tax expense, a decrease in the valuation
allowance, and for cancellation of debt income offset by a
repurchase premium and original issue discount. During the
quarter ended April 4, 2009, our effective tax rate was
16.5% which was consistent with our expectation for the full
2009 fiscal year.
During February 2010, the CI Partnerships contributed
approximately $218.8 million aggregate principal amount of
9% Senior Subordinated Notes to us in exchange for equity
of Ply Gem Prime valued at approximately $114.9 million.
Prior to this $218.8 million contribution to us, the CI
Partnerships initially transferred the notes to Ply Gem Prime,
our direct parent, which then transferred the notes to us and we
transferred such notes to Ply Gem Industries as a capital
contribution and the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes were then
cancelled. As a result of these debt transactions, we recognized
$35.3 million of additional cancellation of indebtedness
income (CODI) for income tax purposes during the
quarter ended April 3, 2010. During the quarter ended
April 4, 2009, affiliates of the CI Partnerships purchased
a majority of the
62
9% Senior Subordinated Notes. We determined that
approximately $95.7 million would be considered CODI for
the quarter ended April 4, 2009 as the acquiring party was
deemed a related party for income tax purposes.
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the
Act). Among its provisions, the Act permits certain
taxpayers to elect to defer the taxation of CODI arising from
certain repurchases, exchanges or modifications of their
outstanding debt that occur during 2009 and 2010. For debt
acquired in 2009, the CODI can be deferred for five years and
then included in taxable income ratably over the next five
years. The CODI deferral and inclusion periods for debt acquired
during 2010 would be four years. If this election is made by
September 2010 for debt acquired in 2009 or September 2011 for
debt acquired during 2010, we would be required to defer the
deduction of all or a substantial portion of any original
issue discount (OID) expenses as well as the
CODI. These OID deductions also would be deferred until 2014 and
we would be allowed to deduct these costs ratably over the same
four or five-year period. We do not currently plan to defer the
2009 or 2010 CODI.
In addition to the $35.3 million of 2010 CODI income
recognized for income tax purposes, we recognized a repurchase
premium deduction of approximately $10.3 million and an OID
deduction of approximately $17.8 million in conjunction
with the debt transactions occurring during the quarter ended
April 3, 2010. These deductions partially offset the CODI
that was recognized for income tax purposes in the quarter ended
April 3, 2010. The remaining $7.2 million of CODI was
offset during the quarter ended April 3, 2010 by net
operating losses.
Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009
decreased to approximately $17.9 million from a benefit of
approximately $70.0 million for 2008. The decrease was
caused by an increase in valuation allowances of approximately
$42.0 million offset by the tax benefit of approximately
$24.9 million associated with cancellation of debt income
and improved operating performance compared to 2008. As of
December 31, 2009, a full valuation allowance has been
provided against certain deferred tax assets as it is presently
deemed more likely than not that the benefit of such net tax
assets will not be utililized. Due to recent cumulative losses
accumulated by us, management did not rely upon projections of
future taxable income in assessing the recoverability of
deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately 18.9%. At
December 31, 2008, we were in a net deferred tax liability
position and had sufficient taxable income from reversing
taxable temporary differences to realize the federal deferred
tax assets. We scheduled out the reversing temporary differences
associated with our deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities to conclude that a full valuation allowance was not
necessary at December 31, 2008.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2008
changed from a tax provision of approximately $3.6 million
for 2007 to a tax benefit of approximately $70.0 million,
primarily as a result of a pre-tax loss incurred during 2008
caused primarily by the $450.0 million goodwill impairment
and the $27.6 million in deferred financing cost expenses.
Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008
was 38.1% excluding the goodwill impairment charge.
Liquidity and
capital resources
During the three months ended April 3, 2010, cash and cash
equivalents increased approximately $14.6 million compared
to $31.7 million as of April 3, 2010, reflecting
increased borrowings on the ABL Facility due to our seasonal
working capital needs. During the year
63
ended December 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents
decreased approximately $41.2 million to $17.1 million
as of December 31, 2009, reflecting the challenging
economic conditions currently affecting the housing industry.
Our business is seasonal because inclement weather during the
winter months reduces the level of building and remodeling
activity in both the home repair and remodeling and the new home
construction sectors, especially in the Northeast and Midwest
regions of the United States and Western Canada. As a result,
our liquidity typically increases during the second and third
quarters as our borrowing base increases under the ABL Facility
reaching a peak early in the fourth quarter, and decreases late
in the fourth quarter and throughout the first quarter.
Our primary cash needs are for working capital, capital
expenditures and debt service. As of April 3, 2010, our
annual interest charges for debt service, including the ABL
Facility, were estimated to be approximately
$108.5 million. We do not have any scheduled debt
maturities until 2013. On a pro forma basis, after giving effect
to this offering and the application of net proceeds from this
offering, our annual cash interest charges for debt service are
estimated to be $ million.
The specific debt instruments and their corresponding terms and
due dates are described in the following sections.
Our capital expenditures were estimated to be approximately 1.4%
to 1.6% of net sales on an annual basis. As of April 3,
2010, our purchase commitments for inventory were approximately
$65.0 million. We finance these cash requirements through
internally generated cash flow and funds borrowed under the ABL
Facility.
We intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering
(i) to redeem or repurchase a portion of our outstanding
indebtedness and (ii) to pay transaction fees and other
expenses. See Use of proceeds. As of
April 3, 2010, on an adjusted basis after giving effect to
the Reorganization Transactions and this offering, we would have
had approximately $ million
of indebtedness outstanding, including $65.0 million of
outstanding borrowings under our ABL Facility.
Substantially all of our outstanding indebtedness will mature in
2013 and 2014. Although we expect to refinance such
indebtedness, we may not be successful in refinancing, extending
the maturity or otherwise amending the terms of such
indebtedness because of market conditions, disruptions in the
debt markets, our financial performance or other reasons.
Furthermore, the terms of any refinancing, extension or
amendment may not be as favorable as the current terms of our
indebtedness. If we are not successful in refinancing our
indebtedness or extending its maturity, we and our subsidiaries
could face substantial liquidity problems and may be forced to
reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek
additional capital or restructure our indebtedness. See
Risk factors Risks associated with our
business We may be unable to generate sufficient
cash to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to
take other actions to satisfy our obligations under such
indebtedness, which may not be successful. We may also be unable
to generate sufficient cash to make required capital
expenditures.
Our specific cash flow movement for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 are
summarized below:
Cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 was approximately $21.4 million. Net
cash used in operating activities for the three months ended
64
April 4, 2009 was approximately $48.7 million. The
decrease in cash used in operating activities for the first
quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009 was
primarily caused by favorable working capital changes for
accounts payable. Throughout the past twelve months, we have
closely monitored our payment terms to maintain and improve
liquidity especially during the fourth and first quarters when
weather impacts our business.
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately $16.9 million. Net
cash used in operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was approximately $58.9 million and
net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was approximately $73.8 million. The
change in cash used in operating activities for 2009 as compared
to 2008 was primarily driven by lower sales of approximately
19.0% for 2009. The sales decrease can be attributed to the
28.4% decrease in single family housing starts during 2009 as
compared to 2008. With lower sales, receivables were lower
throughout the year which contributed to less cash from
operations. The lower sales levels were offset by a positive
inventory change of approximately $26.4 million and
favorable working capital changes for accounts payable and
accrued expenses of approximately $31.6 million compared to
2008. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007
reflected the 40.5% decrease in single family housing starts
which contributed to lower net income during the period.
Cash used in
investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended
April 3, 2010 was approximately $3.0 million. Net cash
used in investing activities for the three months ended
April 4, 2009 was approximately $2.4 million. The cash
used in investing activities for both periods was primarily used
for capital expenditures.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately $7.8 million. Net
cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was approximately $11.5 million and
net cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was approximately $56.4 million. The
cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was primarily used for capital
expenditures. The cash used in investing activities for year
ended December 31, 2008 was predominantly from capital
expenditures of $16.6 million and the acquisition of Ply
Gem Stone for approximately $3.6 million, partially offset
by the sale of assets of approximately $8.8 million. The
decrease in capital expenditures during 2009 reflects
managements ability to effectively manage expenditures
during the current economic downturn. The cash used in investing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
primarily used to fund the acquisition of Pacific Windows and
for capital expenditures.
Cash provided
by (used in) financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months
ended April 3, 2010 was approximately $39.0 million,
primarily from revolver borrowings of $40.0 million and
proceeds from long-term debt of approximately
$145.7 million, offset by the redemption of approximately
$141.2 million principal amount of 9% Senior
Subordinated Notes, and debt issuance costs of approximately
$4.9 million. Net cash provided by financing activities for
the three months ended April 4, 2009 was approximately
$10.0 million and consisted primarily of proceeds from ABL
borrowings.
65
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately $17.5 million,
primarily from net revolver payments of $35.0 million,
proceeds from debt issuance of $20.0 million and debt
issuance costs of approximately $2.5 million. Net cash
provided by financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was approximately $78.2 million and
consisted of approximately $15.6 million of net proceeds
from long-term debt, net revolver borrowings of approximately
$60.0 million and a $30.0 million cash equity
contribution that we received from CI Capital Partners,
partially offset by approximately $26.6 million of debt
issuance costs and approximately $0.8 million of
repurchased net equity. The cash used in financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2007 was primarily used to
pay down debt.
Our specific debt instruments and terms are described below:
11.75% Senior
Secured Notes due 2013
On June 9, 2008, Ply Gem Industries issued
$700.0 million of the Senior Secured Notes at an
approximate 1.0% discount, yielding proceeds of approximately
$693.5 million. Ply Gem Industries used the proceeds to
repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under the then
existing senior secured credit facility of approximately
$676.2 million of term loan borrowings and approximately
$15.0 million of revolver borrowings. The Senior Secured
Notes will mature on June 15, 2013 and bear interest at the
rate of 11.75% per annum. Interest will be paid semi-annually on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. On October 23, 2009,
Ply Gem Industries issued an additional $25.0 million of
its Senior Secured Notes in a private placement transaction. The
net proceeds of $20.0 million were utilized for general
corporate purposes. The additional $25.0 million of Senior
Secured Notes has the same terms and covenants as the initial
$700.0 million of Senior Secured Notes.
Prior to April 1, 2011, Ply Gem Industries may redeem up to
35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured
Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings
at a redemption price equal to 111.75% of the aggregate
principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes
remains outstanding after the redemption. In addition, not more
than once during any twelve-month period, Ply Gem Industries may
redeem up to $70.0 million of the Senior Secured Notes at a
redemption price equal to 103% of the aggregate amount of the
Senior Secured Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
At any time on or after April 1, 2011, Ply Gem Industries
may redeem the Senior Secured Notes, in whole or in part, at
declining redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing
the Senior Secured Notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date.
The Senior Secured Notes are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on a joint and several basis by Ply Gem Holdings and
all of the domestic subsidiaries of Ply Gem Industries (the
Guarantors). The indenture governing the Senior
Secured Notes contains certain covenants that limit the ability
of Ply Gem Industries and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions or
repurchase or redeem their stock, make loans and investments,
sell assets, incur certain liens, enter into agreements
restricting their ability to pay dividends, enter into
transactions with affiliates, and consolidate, merge or sell Ply
Gem Industries assets. In particular, Ply Gem Industries
may not incur additional debt (other than permitted debt in
limited circumstances) unless, after giving effect to such
incurrence, the consolidated interest coverage ratio of Ply Gem
Industries would be at least 2.00 to 1.00. In the
66
absence of satisfying the consolidated interest coverage ratio,
Ply Gem Industries may only incur additional debt in limited
circumstances, including purchase money indebtedness in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $25.0 million at any one
time outstanding, debt of foreign subsidiaries in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $30.0 million at any one time outstanding,
debt pursuant to a general debt basket in an aggregate amount
not to exceed $25.0 million at any one time outstanding and
the refinancing of other debt under certain circumstances. As of
April 3, 2010, Ply Gem Industries only had
$5.0 million of availability under its general debt basket
following the October 2009 issuance of additional Senior Secured
Notes. In addition, Ply Gem Industries is limited in its ability
to pay dividends or make other distributions to Ply Gem
Holdings. Permitted dividends and distributions include those
used to redeem equity of its officers, directors or employees
under certain circumstances, to pay taxes, to pay
out-of-pocket
costs and expenses in an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000
in any calendar year and to pay customary and reasonable costs
and expenses of an offering of securities that is not
consummated.
On November 3, 2008, Ply Gem Industries completed its
exchange offer with respect to the Senior Secured Notes by
exchanging $700.0 million Senior Secured Notes, which were
registered under the Securities Act, for $700.0 million of
the issued and outstanding Senior Secured Notes. Upon completion
of the exchange offer, all issued and outstanding Senior Secured
Notes were registered under the Securities Act. However, the
$25.0 million of Senior Secured Notes issued in October
2009 were not registered under the Securities Act and there is
no contractual requirement to register these notes.
The Senior Secured Notes and the related guarantees are secured
on a first-priority lien basis by substantially all of the
assets (other than the assets securing our obligations under the
ABL Facility, which consist primarily of accounts receivable and
inventory) of Ply Gem Industries and the Guarantors and on a
second-priority lien basis by the assets that secure the ABL
Facility.
In addition, our stock ownership in our subsidiaries
collateralizes the Senior Secured Notes to the extent that such
equity interests and other securities can secure the Senior
Secured Notes without
Rule 3-16
of
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act requiring separate financial statements
of such subsidiary to be filed with the SEC. As of
December 31, 2009, no subsidiarys stock has been
excluded from the collateral arrangement due to the
Rule 3-16
requirement.
Senior Secured
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility due 2013
Concurrently with the Senior Secured Notes offering on
June 9, 2008, Ply Gem Industries, Ply Gem Holdings and the
subsidiaries of Ply Gem Industries entered into the ABL
Facility. The ABL Facility initially provided for revolving
credit financing of up to $150.0 million, subject to
borrowing base availability, with a maturity of five years (June
2013) including
sub-facilities
for letters of credit, swingline loans, and borrowings in
Canadian dollars and U.S. dollars by Ply Gem Canada.
In July 2009, we amended the ABL Facility to increase the
available commitments by $25.0 million from
$150.0 million to $175.0 million. As a condition to
this availability increase, the applicable margins payable on
the loans were increased and made subject to certain minimums.
The July 2009 amendment also changed both the availability
threshold for certain cash dominion events and compliance with
the fixed charge coverage ratio and other covenants.
67
In October 2009, we amended the ABL Facility to allow for the
issuance of the additional $25.0 million Senior Secured
Notes and to permit certain refinancing transactions with
respect to our 9% Senior Subordinated Notes. The October
amendment also permits Ply Gem Industries to issue equity
securities to us, its parent. The October 2009 amendment did not
affect the $175.0 million availability amount or the
applicable interest rate margins under the ABL Facility.
The ABL Facility provides that the revolving commitments may be
increased to $200.0 million, subject to certain terms and
conditions. We had borrowings of $65.0 million and
$25.0 million outstanding under the ABL Facility as of
April 3, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As
of April 3, 2010, Ply Gem Industries had approximately
$103.3 million of contractual availability and
approximately $63.5 million of borrowing base availability
under the ABL Facility, reflecting $65.0 million of
borrowings outstanding and approximately $6.7 million of
letters of credit issued.
The interest rates applicable to loans under the ABL Facility
are, at our option, equal to either a base rate plus an
applicable interest margin, or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an
applicable interest margin, as defined in the ABL Facility
credit agreement. As of April 3, 2010, our interest rate on
the ABL Facility was approximately 6.0%. The ABL Facility
contains a requirement to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio
of 1.1 to 1.0 if our excess availability is less than the
greater of (a) 15% of the lesser of (i) the
commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and
(b) $20.0 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio was
not applicable at any point during 2009 or the first quarter of
2010.
All obligations under the ABL Facility, and the guarantees of
those obligations, are secured, subject to certain exceptions,
by substantially all of the assets of Ply Gem Industries and the
Guarantors, including a first-priority security interest in
personal property consisting of accounts receivable, inventory,
cash, deposit accounts, and certain related assets and proceeds
of the foregoing and a second-priority security interest in, and
mortgages on, substantially all of Ply Gem Industries
material owned real property and equipment and all assets that
secure the Senior Secured Notes on a first-priority basis. In
addition to being secured by the collateral securing the
obligations of Ply Gem Industries under the domestic collateral
package, the obligations of Ply Gem Canada, which is a borrower
under the Canadian
sub-facility
under the ABL Facility, are also secured by a first-priority
security interest in substantially all of the assets of such
Canadian subsidiary, plus additional mortgages in Canada, and a
pledge by Ply Gem Industries of the remaining 35% of the equity
interests of Ply Gem Canada pledged only to secure the Canadian
sub-facility.
The ABL Facility contains certain covenants that limit our
ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions or
repurchase or redeem their stock, make loans and investments,
sell assets, incur certain liens, enter into transactions with
affiliates, and consolidate, merge or sell assets. In
particular, we are permitted to incur additional debt in limited
circumstances, including permitted subordinated indebtedness in
an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50.0 million at any
time outstanding (subject to the ability to incur additional
permitted subordinated debt provided that immediately after
giving effect to such incurrence excess availability is more
than 25% of the lesser of the total borrowing base and the
aggregate commitments and Ply Gem Industries is in pro forma
compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio), purchase money
indebtedness in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$15.0 million at any one time outstanding, debt of foreign
subsidiaries (other than Canadian subsidiaries) in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $2.5 million at any one time
outstanding, unsecured debt in an aggregate amount not to
68
exceed $50.0 million at any one time outstanding and the
refinancing of other debt under certain circumstances. In
addition, Ply Gem Industries is limited in its ability to pay
dividends or make other distributions to Ply Gem Holdings.
Permitted dividends and distributions include those used to
redeem equity of its officers, directors or employees under
certain circumstances, to pay taxes, to pay operating and other
corporate overhead costs and expenses in the ordinary course of
business in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2.0 million
in any calendar year plus reasonable and customary
indemnification claims of its directors and executive officers
and to pay fees and expenses related to any unsuccessful debt or
equity offering. Ply Gem Industries may also make additional
payments to Ply Gem Holdings which may be used by Ply Gem
Holdings to pay dividends or other distributions on its stock
under the ABL Facility so long as before and after giving effect
to such dividend or other distribution excess availability is
greater than 25% of the lesser of the total borrowing base and
the aggregate commitments and Ply Gem Industries is in pro forma
compliance with the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio.
9.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012
Concurrently with the acquisition of Ply Gem Industries on
February 12, 2004, Ply Gem Industries issued
$225.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
9% Senior Subordinated Notes, which were guaranteed by the
Guarantors. Subsequently, in August 2004, in connection with the
MWM Holding acquisition, Ply Gem Industries issued an
additional $135.0 million of 9% Senior Subordinated
Notes, which were also guaranteed by the Guarantors, including
MWM Holding and its subsidiaries. Ply Gem Industries paid
interest semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each
year. As of December 31, 2009, certain affiliates of the CI
Partnerships owned approximately $281.4 million of the
outstanding 9% Senior Subordinated Notes.
On November 19, 2009, Ply Gem Industries launched an
exchange offer for certain of its 9% Senior Subordinated
Notes which expired in accordance with its terms without any
notes being accepted by it. In connection with this exchange
offer, we incurred third party and bank fees of approximately
$0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2009
which has been recorded within interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations.
In connection with the issuance of $150.0 million of the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes on January 11, 2010,
Ply Gem Industries redeemed approximately $141.2 million
aggregate principal amount of the 9% Senior Subordinated
Notes on February 16, 2010 at a redemption price of 100% of
the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest.
Approximately $218.8 million aggregate principal amount of
the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes held by certain affiliates
of the CI Partnerships were transferred to our indirect
stockholders and ultimately to Ply Gem Prime. Such notes were
then transferred to us and then to Ply Gem Industries as a
capital contribution and cancelled on February 12, 2010. In
connection with the redemption, we recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.2 million and in
connection with the capital contribution, we recognized a gain
on extinguishment of debt of approximately $100.4 million.
See Unallocated operating earnings,
interest, and provision for income taxesGain on
extinguishment of debt. In connection with the
transaction in which a majority of the 9% Senior
Subordinated Notes were acquired by certain affiliates, we
expensed approximately $6.1 million of third party fees
which has been recorded within interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
69
13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014
On January 11, 2010, Ply Gem Industries issued
$150.0 million of 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes at
an approximate 3.0% discount, yielding proceeds of approximately
$145.7 million. Ply Gem Industries used the proceeds of the
offering to redeem approximately $141.2 million aggregate
principal amount of its 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2012 and to pay certain related costs and expenses. The
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes will mature on
July 15, 2014 and bear interest at the rate of 13.125% per
annum. Interest will be paid semi-annually on January 15 and
July 15 of each year.
Prior to January 15, 2012, Ply Gem Industries may redeem up
to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes with the net cash
proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption price
equal to 113.125% of the aggregate principal amount of the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, provided that at least 60% of the original
aggregate principal amount of the 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes remains outstanding after the redemption. On
or after January 15, 2012, and prior to January 15,
2013, Ply Gem Industries may redeem up to 100% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes
with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a
redemption price equal to 103% of the aggregate principal amount
of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any. On or after January 15, 2013, Ply
Gem Industries may redeem up to 100% of the aggregate principal
amount of the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes with the
net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date.
The 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes are unsecured and
subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and
future debt, including the ABL Facility and the Senior Secured
Notes. The 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes are
unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by the
Guarantors (other than certain unrestricted subsidiaries) on a
senior subordinated basis. The guarantees are general unsecured
obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all
existing senior debt of the Guarantors, including their
guarantees of the Senior Secured Notes and the ABL Facility.
The indenture governing the 13.125% Senior Subordinated
Notes contains certain covenants that limit the ability of Ply
Gem Industries and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions or
repurchase or redeem their stock, make loans and investments,
sell assets, incur certain liens, enter into transactions with
affiliates, and consolidate, merge or sell Ply Gem
Industries assets. In particular, Ply Gem Industries may
not incur additional debt (other than permitted debt in limited
circumstances) unless, after giving effect to such incurrence,
the consolidated interest coverage ratio would be at least 2.00
to 1.00. In the absence of satisfying the consolidated interest
coverage ratio, Ply Gem Industries may only incur additional
debt in limited circumstances, including, purchase money
indebtedness in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$25.0 million at any one time outstanding, debt of foreign
subsidiaries in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$30.0 million at any one time outstanding, debt pursuant to
a general debt basket in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$25.0 million at any one time outstanding and the
refinancing of other debt under certain circumstances. In
addition, Ply Gem Industries is limited in its ability to pay
dividends or make other distributions to Ply Gem Holdings.
Permitted dividends and distributions include those used to
redeem equity of its officers, directors or employees under
certain circumstances,
70
to pay taxes, to pay
out-of-pocket
costs and expenses in an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000
in any calendar year, to pay customary and reasonable costs and
expenses of an offering of securities that is not consummated
and other dividends or distributions of up to
$20.0 million. Ply Gem Industries may also pay dividends or
make other distributions to Ply Gem Holdings so long as it can
incur $1.00 of additional debt pursuant to the 2.00 to 1.00
consolidated interest coverage ratio test described above and so
long as the aggregate amount of such dividend or distribution
together with certain other dividends and distributions does not
exceed 50% of consolidated net income plus certain other items.
On June 30, 2010, Ply Gem Industries completed its exchange
offer with respect to the 13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes
by exchanging $150.0 million 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes, which were registered under the Securities
Act, for $150.0 million of the issued and outstanding
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes. Upon completion of the
exchange offer, all issued and outstanding 13.125% Senior
Subordinated Notes were registered under the Securities Act.
Senior Term
Loan Facility
Our senior facilities with a syndicate of financial institutions
and institutional lenders provided for senior secured financing
of up to approximately $762.1 million. On May 23,
2008, we entered into an amendment of the fifth amended and
restated credit agreement which consisted of changes to certain
debt covenant ratios. The amendment also increased the interest
rate on the term loan and extended the maturity of the revolving
credit facility from February 12, 2009 to August 12,
2010. On May 23, 2008, Ply Gem received from affiliates of
CI Capital Partners a $30.0 million cash equity
contribution as a condition to the credit facility amendment. On
June 9, 2008, we used the proceeds from the Senior Secured
Notes offering to pay off the obligations under the senior term
loan facility.
As a result of the debt amendment that occurred on May 23,
2008 and the issuance of Senior Secured Notes on June 9,
2008, we evaluated our financing costs and expensed
approximately $27.6 million of fees for the year ended
December 31, 2008 which has been recorded within interest
expense on the consolidated statement of operations. The
$27.6 million was comprised of approximately
$14.0 million of non-cash deferred financing costs
associated with the previous term debt, approximately
$6.8 million for a prepayment premium, and approximately
$6.8 million of bank amendment fees that were subsequently
retired. We deferred costs of approximately $26.6 million
in conjunction with this transaction which have been recorded
within other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Liquidity
Requirements
We intend to fund our ongoing capital and working capital
requirements, including our internal growth, through a
combination of cash flows from operations and, if necessary,
from borrowings under our ABL Facility. We believe that we will
continue to meet our liquidity requirements over the next
12 months. We believe that our operating units are positive
cash flow generating units and will continue to sustain their
operations without any significant liquidity concerns. The
performance of these operating units is significantly impacted
by the performance of the housing industry, specifically single
family housing starts and home repair and remodeling activity.
Any unforeseen or unanticipated downturn in the housing industry
could have a negative impact on our liquidity position.
71
In order to meet these liquidity requirements as well as other
anticipated liquidity needs in the normal course of business, as
of April 3, 2010 we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $31.7 million, $103.3 million of
contractual availability under the ABL Facility and
approximately $63.5 million of borrowing base availability,
and as of December 31, 2009 we had cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $17.1 million,
$142.9 million of contractual availability under the ABL
Facility and approximately $77.9 million of borrowing base
availability. Management currently anticipates that these
amounts, as well as expected cash flows from our operations and
proceeds from any debt or equity financing should be sufficient
to meet ongoing operational cash flow needs, capital
expenditures, debt service obligations, and other fees payable
under other contractual obligations for the foreseeable future.
Contractual
obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations
under financing arrangements and lease commitments as of
December 31, 2009, including interest amounts. Interest on
the Senior Secured Notes and the 9% Senior Subordinated
Notes is fixed at 11.75% and 9.0%, respectively. Interest on the
ABL Facility is variable and has been presented at the current
rate. Actual rates for future periods may differ from those
presented here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
amount
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
1,110,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
385,000
|
|
|
$
|
725,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
369,644
|
|
|
|
121,188
|
|
|
|
209,713
|
|
|
|
38,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cancelable lease commitments(3)
|
|
|
151,258
|
|
|
|
26,168
|
|
|
|
35,838
|
|
|
|
26,581
|
|
|
|
62,671
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(5)
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,644,002
|
|
|
$
|
148,666
|
|
|
$
|
633,171
|
|
|
$
|
792,944
|
|
|
$
|
69,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Long-term debt is shown before
discount (premium), and consists of our Senior Secured Notes,
9% Senior Subordinated Notes and ABL Facility. For more
information concerning the long-term debt, see
Liquidity and capital resources above. As a
result of the redemption of the 9% Senior Subordinated
Notes in February 2010, we will have no principal payments due
until our 2013 fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Interest payments for variable
interest debt are based on current interest rates and debt
obligations at December 31, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Non-cancelable lease commitments
represent lease payments for facilities and equipment.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Purchase obligations are defined as
purchase agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and
that specify all significant terms, including quantity, price
and the approximate timing of the transaction. These obligations
are related primarily to inventory purchases.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Other long-term liabilities include
pension obligations which are estimated based on our 2010 annual
funding requirement. Because we are unable to reliably estimate
the timing of future tax payments related to uncertain tax
positions, certain tax related obligations of approximately
$9.7 million have been excluded from the table above.
|
72
The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations
under financing arrangements and lease commitments as of
April 3, 2010 including interest amounts, on a pro forma
basis after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions,
this offering and the application of the net proceeds of this
offering. Interest on the Senior Secured Notes and the
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes is fixed at 11.75% and
13.125%, respectively. Interest on the ABL Facility is variable
and has been presented at the current rate. Actual rates for
future periods may differ from those presented here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1 - 3 years
|
|
|
3 - 5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cancelable lease commitments(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Long-term debt is shown before
discount (premium), and consists of our Senior Secured Notes,
13.125% Senior Subordinated Notes and ABL Facility. For
|