Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - Globalstar, Inc. | v188424_8k.htm |
EX-99.2 - Globalstar, Inc. | v188424_ex99-2.htm |
EX-99.4 - Globalstar, Inc. | v188424_ex99-4.htm |
EX-99.1 - Globalstar, Inc. | v188424_ex99-1.htm |
Exhibit
99.3
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
|
||
Audited
consolidated financial statements of Globalstar, Inc.
|
||
Report
of Crowe Horwath LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
statements of loss for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
statements of comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
statements of ownership equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007
|
6
|
|
Consolidated
statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
7
|
|
Notes
to consolidated financial statements
|
8
|
1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of
Directors and Stockholders
Globalstar,
Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Globalstar, Inc.
(“Globalstar”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of loss, comprehensive loss, ownership equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. We also have
audited Globalstar’s internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Globalstar’s management is responsible for these financial statements,
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and an opinion on the company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Globalstar as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also
in our opinion, Globalstar maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
As
discussed in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated
financial statements have been adjusted for the retrospective application of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-15
Accounting for Own-Share
Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance, which
became effective January 1, 2010 for the Company
/s/ Crowe
Horwath LLP
Oak
Brook, Illinois
March 12,
2010 except for Note 19, as to which the date is June 17, 2010
2
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except par value and share data)
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009 (1)
|
2008 (1)
|
||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 67,881 | $ | 12,357 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $5,735 (2009), and $5,205
(2008)
|
9,392 | 10,075 | ||||||
Inventory
|
61,719 | 55,105 | ||||||
Advances
for inventory
|
9,332 | 9,314 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
5,404 | 5,565 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
153,728 | 92,416 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
964,921 | 644,031 | ||||||
Other
assets:
|
||||||||
Restricted
cash
|
40,473 | 57,884 | ||||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
69,647 | 8,302 | ||||||
Other
assets, net
|
37,871 | 14,245 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,266,640 | $ | 816,878 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND OWNERSHIP EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 76,661 | $ | 28,370 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
30,520 | 29,998 | ||||||
Payables
to affiliates
|
541 | 3,344 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
19,911 | 19,354 | ||||||
Current
portion of long term debt
|
2,259 | 33,575 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
129,892 | 114,641 | ||||||
Borrowings
under revolving credit facility
|
— | 66,050 | ||||||
Long
term debt
|
463,551 | 172,295 | ||||||
Employee
benefit obligations, net of current portion
|
4,499 | 4,782 | ||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
49,755 | — | ||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
23,151 | 13,713 | ||||||
Total
non-current liabilities
|
540,956 | 256,840 | ||||||
Ownership
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
Stock, $0.0001 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding – none at December 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
||||||||
Series
A Preferred Convertible Stock, $0.0001 par value: one share authorized and
none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; none authorized, issued
or outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
— | — | ||||||
Voting
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; 865,000,000 and 800,000,000 shares
authorized at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,
274,384,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009;
136,606,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008
|
27 | 14 | ||||||
Nonvoting
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; 135,000,000 shares authorized, 16,750,000
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; none authorized,
issued or outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
2 | — | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
700,814 | 480,097 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,718 | ) | (6,304 | ) | ||||
Retained
deficit
|
(103,333 | ) | (28,410 | ) | ||||
Total
ownership equity
|
595,792 | 445,397 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and ownership equity
|
$ | 1,266,640 | $ | 816,878 |
(1) As
revised, see Note 19
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
3
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF LOSS
(In
thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009 (1)
|
2008 (1)
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||
Service
revenue
|
$ | 50,228 | $ | 61,794 | $ | 78,313 | ||||||
Subscriber
equipment sales
|
14,051 | 24,261 | 20,085 | |||||||||
Total
revenue
|
64,279 | 86,055 | 98,398 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately
below)
|
36,204 | 37,132 | 27,775 | |||||||||
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales:
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
9,881 | 17,921 | 13,863 | |||||||||
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales – impairment of
assets
|
913 | 405 | 19,109 | |||||||||
Total
cost of subscriber equipment sales
|
10,794 | 18,326 | 32,972 | |||||||||
Marketing,
general, and administrative
|
49,210 | 61,351 | 49,146 | |||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,862 | 26,956 | 13,137 | |||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
118,070 | 143,765 | 123,030 | |||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(53,791 | ) | (57,710 | ) | (24,632 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on extinguishment of debt
|
— | 41,411 | — | |||||||||
Interest
income
|
502 | 4,713 | 3,170 | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(6,730 | ) | (5,733 | ) | (9,023 | ) | ||||||
Derivative
loss, net
|
(15,585 | ) | (3,259 | ) | (3,232 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
665 | (4,497 | ) | 8,656 | ||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(21,148 | ) | 32,635 | (429 | ) | |||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(74,939 | ) | (25,075 | ) | (25,061 | ) | ||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(16 | ) | (2,283 | ) | 2,864 | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (74,923 | ) | $ | (22,792 | ) | $ | (27,925 | ) | |||
Loss
per common share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.36 | ) | |||
Diluted
|
(0.58 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.36 | ) | ||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
128,130 | 85,478 | 77,169 | |||||||||
Diluted
|
128,130 | 85,478 | 77,169 |
(1) As
revised, see Note 19
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
4
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In
thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008 (1)
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (74,923 | ) | $ | (22,792 | ) | $ | (27,925 | ) | |||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability adjustment
|
407 | (3,516 | ) | 402 | ||||||||
Net
foreign currency translation adjustment
|
4,179 | (6,199 | ) | 4,175 | ||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (70,337 | ) | $ | (32,507 | ) | $ | (23,348 | ) |
(1) As
revised, see Note 19
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
5
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OWNERSHIP EQUITY
(In
thousands, as revised see Note 19)
Common
Shares
|
Common
Stock
Amount
|
Preferred
Shares
|
Preferred
Stock
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances – December
31, 2006
|
72,545 | $ | 7 | — | $ | — | $ | 238,919 | $ | (1,166 | ) | $ | 22,937 | $ | 260,697 | |||||||||||||||||
Adoption
of FIN 48
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (630 | ) | (630 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock related to GAT settlement (including
interest)
|
154 | — | — | — | 123 | — | — | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with Thermo agreement
|
9,443 | 1 | — | — | 152,656 | — | — | 152,657 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted stock awards and recognition of stock-based
compensation
|
1,179 | — | — | — | 10,430 | — | — | 10,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock related to GdeV acquisition
|
25 | — | — | — | 246 | — | — | 246 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution
of services
|
— | — | — | — | 420 | — | — | 420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of redeemable common stock related to GAT settlement
|
347 | — | — | — | 4,949 | — | — | 4,949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
— | — | — | — | — | 4,577 | — | 4,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (27,925 | ) | (27,925 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances – December
31, 2007
|
83,693 | $ | 8 | — | $ | — | $ | 407,743 | $ | 3,411 | $ | (5,618 | ) | $ | 405,544 | |||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Notes
|
25,811 | 3 | — | — | 6,524 | — | — | 6,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted stock awards and recognition of stock-based
compensation
|
2,051 | — | — | — | 12,608 | — | — | 12,608 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in relation to Brazil acquisition
|
883 | — | — | — | 6,000 | — | — | 6,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution
of services
|
— | — | — | — | 449 | — | — | 449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock under the Share Loan Facility, net
|
24,168 | 3 | — | — | 520 | — | — | 523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of convertible notes, net of deferred taxes of $22,417 and issuance costs
of $1,762
|
— | — | — | — | 29,978 | — | — | 29,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption
of accounting guidance related to share loan agreement
|
— | — | — | — | 16,275 | — | — | 16,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | (9,715 | ) | — | (9,715 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (22,792 | ) | (22,792 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances – December
31, 2008
|
136,606 | $ | 14 | — | $ | — | $ | 480,097 | $ | (6,304 | ) | $ | (28,410 | ) | $ | 445,397 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted stock awards and recognition of stock-based
compensation
|
7,112 | — | — | 10,341 | — | — | 10,341 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Revolving Credit Facility to Common Shares
|
10,000 | 1 | — | — | 7,799 | — | — | 7,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility to Preferred Series A Stock
(net of offering costs)
|
— | — | 1 | — | 180,052 | — | — | 180,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Preferred Series A Stock to Common Shares
|
126,174 | 13 | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to Thermo
|
1,391 | — | — | — | 1,000 | — | — | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution
of services
|
— | — | — | — | 337 | — | — | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued associated with Subordinated loan
|
— | — | — | — | 5,215 | — | — | 5,215 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued in connection with conversions of 8% Notes
|
10,175 | 1 | — | — | 10,473 | — | — | 10,474 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with interest payments related to 8%
Notes
|
246 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return
of common stock under share loan facility
|
(6,868 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock in connection with acquisition
|
6,298 | — | — | — | 5,500 | — | — | 5,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
— | — | — | — | — | 4,586 | — | 4,586 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (74,923 | ) | (74,923 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances – December
31, 2009
|
291,134 | (1) | $ | 29 | (1) | — | $ | — | $ | 700,814 | $ | (1,718 | ) | $ | (103,333 | ) | $ | 595,792 |
(1) Includes 274,384 and 16,750 shares of
voting common stock and non-voting common stock,
respectively.
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
6
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008 (1)
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (74,923 | ) | $ | (22,792 | ) | $ | (27,925 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,862 | 26,956 | 13,137 | |||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
9,947 | 12,482 | 9,570 | |||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative instruments and derivative
liabilities
|
15,585 | 3,259 | 3,232 | |||||||||
Gain
on conversion of convertible notes
|
— | (41,411 | ) | — | ||||||||
Provision
for bad debts
|
824 | 1,818 | 1,774 | |||||||||
Interest
income on restricted cash
|
(115 | ) | (4,015 | ) | (2,310 | ) | ||||||
Equity
losses in investee
|
1,928 | 249 | — | |||||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
4,056 | 2,913 | 8,109 | |||||||||
Impairment
of assets
|
913 | 405 | 19,109 | |||||||||
Non-cash
expenses related to debt conversion
|
— | 508 | — | |||||||||
Other
|
669 | (870 | ) | 64 | ||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,405 | (128 | ) | 6,416 | ||||||||
Inventory
|
4,189 | (12,416 | ) | (36,445 | ) | |||||||
Advances
for inventory
|
(132 | ) | (1,695 | ) | 7,912 | |||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
895 | 2,137 | (971 | ) | ||||||||
Other
assets
|
(4,704 | ) | (1,805 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(8,584 | ) | 6,825 | 2,494 | ||||||||
Payables
to affiliates
|
(2,967 | ) | 2,261 | (5,075 | ) | |||||||
Accrued
expenses and employee benefit obligations
|
8,348 | (5,123 | ) | (2,503 | ) | |||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
796 | (965 | ) | (503 | ) | |||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
1,585 | 822 | (3,710 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(18,423 | ) | (30,585 | ) | (7,669 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Spare
and second-generation satellites and launch costs
|
(300,615 | ) | (268,433 | ) | (165,377 | ) | ||||||
Second-generation
ground
|
(21,212 | ) | (5,697 | ) | — | |||||||
Property
and equipment additions
|
(2,271 | ) | (11,956 | ) | (4,612 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
— | 141 | 263 | |||||||||
Payment
for intangible assets
|
— | — | (1,657 | ) | ||||||||
Investment
in businesses
|
(1,823 | ) | (2,620 | ) | — | |||||||
Cash
acquired on purchase of subsidiary
|
— | 1,839 | — | |||||||||
Restricted
cash
|
14,229 | 28,145 | (11,995 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(311,692 | ) | (258,581 | ) | (183,378 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from Thermo under the irrevocable standby stock purchase
agreement
|
— | — | 152,657 | |||||||||
Borrowings
from long term debt
|
— | 100,000 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds
from revolving credit loan, net
|
7,750 | 16,050 | 50,000 | |||||||||
Borrowings
from 5.75% Notes
|
— | 150,000 | — | |||||||||
Payments
on notes payable
|
— | — | (477 | ) | ||||||||
Borrowings
from 8.00% Notes
|
55,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Borrowings
from Facility Agreement
|
371,219 | — | — | |||||||||
Borrowings
from subordinated loan agreement
|
25,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Borrowings
under short-term loan
|
2,259 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred
financing cost payments
|
(63,047 | ) | (4,893 | ) | (2,503 | ) | ||||||
Payments
for interest rate cap instrument
|
(12,425 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Payments
related to interest rate swap derivative margin account
|
— | (9,144 | ) | (6,188 | ) | |||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
1,000 | 520 | — | |||||||||
Net
cash from financing activities
|
386,756 | 252,533 | 193,489 | |||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(1,117 | ) | 11,436 | (8,586 | ) | |||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
55,524 | (25,197 | ) | (6,144 | ) | |||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
12,357 | 37,554 | 43,698 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 67,881 | $ | 12,357 | $ | 37,554 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 15,379 | $ | 15,987 | $ | 3,526 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 308 | $ | 1,001 | $ | 173 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Conversion
of Thermo LOC, term loan and accrued interest from debt to
equity
|
$ | 180,177 | — | — | ||||||||
Accrued
launch costs and second-generation satellites costs
|
$ | 58,055 | $ | 14,762 | $ | 3,583 | ||||||
Conversion
of note receivable to equity in investee company
|
$ | 7,500 | — | — | ||||||||
Vendor
financing of second-generation Globalstar System
|
— | $ | 57,200 | — | ||||||||
Accrual
of interest for spare and second-generation satellites and launch
costs
|
$ | 7,185 | $ | 15,964 | $ | 196 | ||||||
Capitalized
interest paid in common stock and 8% Notes
|
$ | 7,257 | — | — | ||||||||
Conversion
of Convertible Senior Notes into common stock
|
$ | 10,738 | $ | 78,196 | — |
(1) As
revised, see Note 19
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
7
GLOBALSTAR,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Globalstar
is a leading provider of mobile voice and data communications services via
satellite. Globalstar’s network, originally owned by Globalstar, L.P. (“Old
Globalstar”), was designed, built and launched in the late 1990s by a technology
partnership led by Loral Space and Communications (“Loral”) and Qualcomm
Incorporated (“Qualcomm”). On February 15, 2002, Old Globalstar and three of its
subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code. In 2004, Thermo Capital Partners LLC (“Thermo”) became
Globalstar’s principal owner, and Globalstar completed the acquisition of the
business and assets of Old Globalstar. Thermo remains Globalstar’s largest
stockholder. Globalstar’s Executive Chairman controls Thermo and its affiliates.
Two other members of Globalstar’s Board of Directors are also directors,
officers or minority equity owners of various Thermo entities.
Globalstar
offers satellite services to commercial and recreational users in more than 120
countries around the world. The Company’s voice and data products include mobile
and fixed satellite telephones, Simplex and duplex satellite data modems and
flexible service packages. Many land based and maritime industries benefit from
Globalstar with increased productivity from remote areas beyond cellular and
landline service. Globalstar’s customers include those in the following
industries: oil and gas, government, mining, forestry, commercial fishing,
utilities, military, transportation, heavy construction, emergency preparedness,
and business continuity, as well as individual recreational users.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use
of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year consolidated
financial statements to conform to current year presentation.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Globalstar and all its
subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been
eliminated in the consolidation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted
cash is comprised of funds held in escrow by two financial institutions to
secure the Company’s payment obligations related to its contract for the
construction of its second-generation satellite constellation and the remaining
scheduled semi-annual interest payments on the 5.75 % Notes through April 1,
2011.
Derivatives
The
Company enters into financing arrangements that are hybrid instruments that
contain embedded derivative features. The Company accounts for these arrangement
in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC
815-10-50, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,”
“Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially
Settled in, a Company's Own Stock,” as well as related interpretations of these
standards. In accordance with this guidance, derivative instruments are
recognized as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial
position and are measured at fair value with gains or losses recognized in
earnings. Embedded derivatives that are not clearly and closely related to the
host contract are bifurcated and recognized at fair value with changes in fair
value recognized as either a gain or loss in earnings if they can be reliably
measured. The Company determines the fair value of derivative instruments based
on available market data using appropriate valuation models.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations
of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and restricted
cash. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consist primarily of highly
liquid short-term investments deposited with financial institutions that are of
high credit quality.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are uncollateralized, without interest and consist primarily of
on-going service revenue and equipment receivables. The Company performs
on-going credit evaluations of its customers and records specific allowances for
bad debts based on factors such as current trends, the length of time the
receivables are past due and historical collection experience. Accounts
receivable are considered past due in accordance with the contractual terms of
the arrangements. Accounts receivable balances that are determined likely to be
uncollectible are included in the allowance for doubtful accounts. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off
against the allowance.
8
The
following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts
(in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | 5,205 | $ | 4,177 | $ | 3,609 | ||||||
Provision,
net of recoveries
|
824 | 1,818 | 1,774 | |||||||||
Write-offs
|
(294 | ) | (790 | ) | (1,206 | ) | ||||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 5,735 | $ | 5,205 | $ | 4,177 |
Inventory
Inventory
consists of purchased products, including fixed and mobile user terminals,
accessories and gateway spare parts. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or
market value. Cost is computed using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method which
determines the acquisition cost on a FIFO basis. Inventory allowances are
recorded for inventories with a lower market value or which are slow moving.
Unsaleable inventory is written off. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company
recorded $0.9 million, $0.4 million and $19.1 million, respectively, in
impairment charges on its inventory representing a write-down of its first
generation phone and accessory inventory, respectively. This charge was
recognized after assessment of the Company’s inventory quantities and its recent
and projected equipment sales.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation and
impairment. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the respective assets, as follows:
Globalstar
System:
|
|
|
Space
component
|
Up
to periods of 8 years from commencement of service
|
|
Ground
component
|
Up
to periods of 8 years from commencement of service
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures & equipment
|
3
to 10 years
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Shorter
of lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, generally
5 years
|
The
Globalstar System includes costs for the design, manufacture, test, and launch
of a constellation of low earth orbit satellites, including in-orbit spare
satellites (the “Space Component”), and primary and backup control centers and
gateways (the “Ground Component”).
The
Company records losses from the in-orbit failure of a satellite in the period it
is determined that the satellite is not recoverable.
The
Company reviews the carrying value of the Globalstar System for impairment every
fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
recorded value of the Space Component and Ground Component may not be
recoverable. Globalstar looks to current and future undiscounted cash flows,
excluding financing costs, as primary indicators of recoverability. If
impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated
based on fair value.
The
Globalstar System includes costs for the design, manufacture, test, and launch
of a constellation of low earth orbit satellites, including satellites put into
service which were previously recorded as spare satellites and held as ground
spares until the Company launched four satellites each in May and October 2007.
The spare satellites and associated launch costs included costs that were
considered construction-in-progress and were transferred to Globalstar System
when placed into service. The Company began depreciating costs for each
particular satellite over an estimated life of eight years from the date it was
placed into service.
Deferred
Financing Costs
These
costs represent costs incurred in obtaining long-term debt, credit facilities
and long term convertible senior notes. These costs are classified as long-term
other assets and are amortized as additional interest expense over the term of
the corresponding debt, credit facilities or the first put option date for the
long term convertible notes. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had
net deferred financing costs of $69.6 million and $8.3 million, respectively.
The Company incurred an additional $73.6 million in financing costs during 2009.
Approximately $6.5 million and $0.4 million of deferred financing costs were
recorded as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Asset
Retirement Obligation
The
Company capitalized, as part of the carrying amount, the estimated costs
associated with the eventual retirement of five gateways owned by the Company.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had accrued approximately $0.8
million and $0.7 million, respectively, for asset retirement obligations. The
Company believes this estimate will be sufficient to satisfy the Company’s
obligation under leases to remove the gateway equipment and restore the sites to
their original condition.
9
Revenue
Recognition and Deferred Revenues
Monthly
access fees billed to retail customers and resellers, representing the minimum
monthly charge for each line of service based on its associated rate plan, are
billed on the first day of each monthly bill cycle. Airtime minute fees in
excess of the monthly access fees are billed in arrears on the first day of each
monthly billing cycle. To the extent that billing cycles fall during the course
of a given month and a portion of the monthly services has not been delivered at
month end, fees are prorated and fees associated with the undelivered portion of
a given month are deferred. Under certain annual plans, where customers prepay
for minutes, revenue is deferred until the minutes are used or the prepaid time
period expires. Unused minutes are accumulated until they expire, usually one
year after activation. In addition, the Company offers other annual plans
whereby the customer is charged an annual fee to access our system. These fees
are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the plan. In some
cases, the Company charges a per minute rate whereby it recognizes the revenue
when each minute is used.
Occasionally
the Company has granted to customers credits which are expensed or charged
against deferred revenue when granted.
Subscriber
acquisition costs include items such as dealer commissions, internal sales
commissions and equipment subsidies and are expensed at the time of the related
sale.
The
Company also provides certain engineering services to assist customers in
developing new applications related to our system. The revenues associated with
these services are recorded when the services are rendered, and the expenses are
recorded when incurred. The Company records revenues and costs associated with
long term engineering contracts on the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting.
The
Company owns and operates its satellite constellation and earns a portion of its
revenues through the sale of airtime minutes on a wholesale basis to independent
gateway operators. Revenue from services provided to independent gateway
operators is recognized based upon airtime minutes used by customers of
independent gateway operators and contractual fee arrangements. Where collection
is uncertain, revenue is recognized when cash payment is received.
During
the second quarter of 2007, the Company introduced an unlimited airtime usage
service plan (called the Unlimited Loyalty plan) which allows existing and new
customers to use unlimited satellite voice minutes for anytime calls for a fixed
monthly or annual fee. The unlimited loyalty plan incorporates a declining price
schedule that reduces fixed monthly fee at the completion of each calendar year
through the duration of the customer agreement, which ends on June 30, 2010.
Customers have an option to extend their customer agreement by one year at a
discounted fixed price. The Company records revenue for this plan on a monthly
basis based on a straight line average derived by computing the total fees
charged over the term of the customer agreement (including the optional year)
and dividing it by the number of the months. If a customer cancels prior to the
ending date of the customer agreement, the balance in deferred revenue is
recognized as revenue.
The
Company sells SPOT satellite GPS messenger services as annual plans and bills
the customer at the time the customer activates the service. The Company defers
revenue on such annual service plans upon activation and recognizes it ratably
over service term.
Subscriber
equipment revenue represents the sale of fixed and mobile user terminals,
accessories and SPOT satellite GPS messenger product. The Company recognizes
revenue upon shipment provided title and risk of loss have passed to the
customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and
determinable and collection is probable.
At times,
the Company will sell subscriber equipment through multi-element contracts that
bundle subscriber equipment with services. When the Company sells subscriber
equipment and services in bundled arrangements and determines that it has
separate units of accounting, the Company will allocate the bundled contract
price among the various contract deliverables based on each deliverable’s
relative fair value. The Company will determine vendor specific objective
evidence of fair value by assessing sales prices of subscriber equipment and
services when they are sold to customers on a stand-alone basis.
At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s deferred revenue aggregated
approximately $22.4 million (of which $2.5 million was included in non-current
liabilities) and $20.6 million (of which $1.3 million was included in
non-current liabilities), respectively.
The
Company does not record sales and use tax and other taxes collected from its
customers in revenue.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs were $4.3 million, $3.2 million and $2.9 million for 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and are expensed as incurred as cost of
services.
Advertising
Expenses
Advertising
expenses were $3.4 million, $5.4 million and $1.5 million for 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and are expensed as incurred as part of marketing, general
and administrative expenses.
Foreign
Currency
Foreign
currency assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current
exchange rates and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates in effect during each period. For 2009, 2008 and 2007, the foreign
currency translation adjustments were $4.2 million, $(6.2) million and $4.2
million, respectively.
Foreign
currency transaction gains and (losses) are included in net income. Foreign
currency transaction gains (losses) were $1.7 million, $(4.5) million and $8.2
million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These were classified as other
income or expense on the statement of operations.
10
Income
Taxes
Until
January 1, 2006, the Company and its U.S. operating subsidiary were treated as
partnerships for U.S. tax purposes (Note 8). Generally, taxable income or loss,
deductions and credits of the partnership are passed through to its partners.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company elected to be taxed as a C corporation
for U.S. tax purposes and began accounting for income taxes as a
corporation.
As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had gross deferred tax assets of
approximately $148.4 million and $122.6 million, respectively. The Company
established a valuation reserve of $148.4 million and $122.6` million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to its concern that it may be more
likely than not that the Company may not be able to utilize the deferred tax
assets.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company is required to recognize compensation expense in the financial
statements for both employee and non-employee share-based awards based on the
grant date fair value of those awards. Additionally, stock-based compensation
expense includes an estimate for pre-vesting forfeitures and is recognized over
the requisite service periods of the awards on a straight-line basis, which is
generally commensurate with the vesting term.
Segments
Globalstar
operates in one segment, providing voice and data communication services via
satellite. As a result, all segment-related financial information is included in
the consolidated financial statements.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
All
components of comprehensive income (loss), including the minimum pension
liability adjustment and foreign currency translation adjustment, are reported
in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized.
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period
from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources.
Earnings
Per Share
The
Company is required to present basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic
earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents are included in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share only when the effect of their
inclusion would be dilutive.
The
following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted loss per share
(in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
(Numerator)
|
Weighted-Average
Shares
Outstanding
(Denominator)
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
Basic
and dilutive loss per common share
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (74,923 | ) | 128,130 | $ | (0.58 | ) |
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
(Numerator)
|
Weighted-Average
Shares
Outstanding
(Denominator)
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
Basic
and dilutive loss per common share
|
||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (22,792 | ) | 85,478 | $ | (0.27 | ) |
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
|
Income
(Numerator)
|
Weighted-Average
Shares
Outstanding
(Denominator)
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
Basic
and dilutive loss per common share
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (27,925 | ) | 77,169 | $ | (0.36 | ) |
For 2009,
2008 and 2007, diluted net loss per share of common stock is the same as basic
net loss per share of common stock, because the effects of potentially dilutive
securities are anti-dilutive. See Note 15 for potentially dilutive
shares.
11
At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, 17.3 million and 24.2 million, respectively, in
Borrowed Shares related to our Share Lending Agreement (See Note 19) remained
outstanding. The Company does not consider the Borrowed Shares outstanding for
the purposes of computing and reporting its earnings per share.
Issued
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
Effective
January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s
(“FASB’s”) recently issued guidance on accounting for share loan facilities (see
Note 19).
Effective
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted the requirements of FASB ASC 855 (previously
FASB SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent
Events”) for subsequent events, which established standards for the
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are available to be issued. These standards are
largely the same guidance on subsequent events which previously existed only in
auditing literature.
Effective
April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC
820-10-50 (previously FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures About Fair
Value of Financial Instruments” ). These disclosures have been provided
in Note 13, “Derivatives.”
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the fair value measurement and disclosure
requirements of FASB ASC 820 (previously SFAS No. 157, “ Fair Value Measurements” )
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding accounting for convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash
settlement). The guidance requires the liability and equity components of
convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion
(including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner
that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. As such, the
initial debt proceeds from the sale of the Company’s 5.75% Convertible Senior
Notes (the 5.75% Notes), which are discussed in more detail in Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, are required to be allocated between a
liability component and an equity component as of the debt issuance date. The
resulting debt discount is amortized over the instrument’s expected life as
additional non-cash interest expense.
This
guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and
required retrospective application. During the first quarter of 2009, the
Company adopted this guidance. All prior year information has been revised to
present the retrospective adoption of this guidance. The adoption of this
guidance is described further below and in more detail in Note 19 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements contained in a Current Report on
Form 8-K dated August 21, 2009.
The
adoption of this guidance changed the Company’s full-year 2008 Consolidated
Statements of Operations because the gains associated with conversions and
exchanges of 5.75% Notes in 2008 were recorded in stockholders’ equity prior to
adoption of this standard. The Company capitalized the interest associated with
the accretion of debt discount recorded in connection with this adoption, which
resulted in an increase to property and equipment.
Issued
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06.
This ASU amends the ASC guidance on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The
ASU requires new disclosures regarding the transfer of items from Levels 1 and
2, new disclosure on the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements and
increased disclosure regarding the inputs and valuation techniques for Level 2
and 3 measurements. The adoption of the ASU will increase disclosure but should
have no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, which provides new standards for
the accounting for certain revenue arrangements that include software elements.
These new standards amend the scope of pre-existing software revenue guidance by
removing from the guidance non-software components of tangible products and
certain software components of tangible products. These new standards are
effective for Globalstar beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011,
however early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect these new
standards to significantly impact its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, which eliminates the use of the
residual method and incorporates the use of an estimated selling price to
allocate arrangement consideration. In addition, the revenue recognition
guidance amends the scope to exclude tangible products that contain software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s
essential functionality. The amendments to the accounting standards related to
revenue recognition are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2010. Upon adoption, the Company may apply the guidance retrospectively or
prospectively for new or materially modified arrangements. The Company is
currently evaluating the financial impact that this accounting standard will
have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
3.
ACQUISITION
On
December 18, 2009, Globalstar entered into an agreement with Axonn L.L.C.
(“Axonn”) pursuant to which one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries
acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Axonn in exchange for
payment at closing of $1.5 million in cash, subject to a working capital
adjustment, and $5.5 million in shares of its voting common stock. Of these
amounts, $500,000 in cash is held in an escrow account to cover expenses related
to the voluntary replacement of first production models of our second-generation
SPOT satellite GPS messenger devices. Additionally, 2,750,000 shares of stock
are held in escrow for any pre-acquisition contingencies not disclosed during
the transaction. Globalstar may be obligated to pay up to an additional $10.8
million for earnout payments based on sales of existing and new products over a
five-year earnout period. As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s best estimate
of the total earnout will be 100% or $10.8 million; consequently, the Company
accrued the fair value of that expected earnout or approximately $6.0 million.
Earnout payments will be made principally in stock (not to exceed 10% of the
Company’s pre-transaction outstanding common stock), but may be paid in cash
after 13 million shares have been issued at Globalstar’s option. Axonn was the
principal supplier of the SPOT satellite GPS messenger products.
12
In
connection with the transaction described above, the Company issued 6,298,058
shares of voting common stock to Axonn and certain of its lenders under Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction not involving a public
offering. The recipients may not sell any of these shares until the first
anniversary of the closing.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s initial allocation of the purchase
price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition (in
thousands):
December 18,
2009
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 1,176 | ||
Inventory
|
2,424 | |||
Property
and equipment
|
931 | |||
Intangible
assets and goodwill
|
10,776 | |||
Total
assets acquired
|
$ | 15,307 | ||
Accounts
payable and other accrued liabilities
|
2,311 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
$ | 2,311 | ||
Net
assets acquired
|
$ | 12,996 |
The
Company is accounting for the acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting. The Company allocated the total estimated purchase prices to net
tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values as
of the date of the acquisition, recording the excess of the purchase price over
those fair values as goodwill. This allocation is preliminary due to the
acquisition being completed late in the Company’s fiscal year and the Company
will be unable to complete the valuation prior to this report’s filing date.
This allocation will be finalized within one year from the acquisition
date.
The
Company has included the results of operations of Axonn in its consolidated
financial statements from the date of acquisition. The results of Axonn prior to
the acquisition are not material.
4.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Globalstar
System:
|
|
|
||||||
Space
component
|
$ | 132,982 | $ | 132,982 | ||||
Ground
component
|
31,623 | 26,154 | ||||||
Construction
in progress:
|
||||||||
Second-generation
satellites, ground and related launch costs
|
852,466 | 518,297 | ||||||
Other
|
1,223 | 958 | ||||||
Furniture
and office equipment
|
20,316 | 16,872 | ||||||
Land
and buildings
|
4,308 | 3,810 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
823 | 687 | ||||||
|
1,043,741 | 699,760 | ||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(78,820 | ) | (55,729 | ) | ||||
|
$ | 964,921 | $ | 644,031 |
Property
and equipment consists of an in-orbit satellite constellation, ground equipment,
second-generation satellites under construction and related launch costs,
second-generation ground component and support equipment located in various
countries around the world.
In June
2009, Globalstar and Thales Alenia Space entered into an amended and restated
contract for the construction of second-generation low-earth orbit satellites to
incorporate prior amendments, acceleration requests and make other non-material
changes to the contract entered into in November 2006. The total contract price,
including subsequent additions, is approximately €678.9 million. Upon closing of
the Facility Agreement (See Note 15 “Borrowings”), amounts in the escrow account
became unrestricted and were reclassed to cash and cash
equivalents.
In March
2007, the Company and Thales Alenia Space entered into an agreement for the
construction of the Satellite Operations Control Centers, Telemetry Command
Units and In Orbit Test Equipment (collectively, the Control Network Facility)
for the Company’s second-generation satellite constellation. The total contract
price for the construction and associated services is €9.8 million, consisting
primarily of €4.1 million for the Satellite Operations Control Centers, €3.6
million for the Telemetry Command Units and €2.1 million for the In Orbit Test
Equipment, with payments to be made on a quarterly basis through completion of
the Control Network Facility in the first quarter of 2010.
13
In
September 2007, the Company and Arianespace (the Launch Provider) entered into
an agreement for the launch of the Company’s second-generation satellites and
certain pre and post-launch services. Pursuant to the agreement, the Launch
Provider agreed to make four launches of six satellites each, and the Company
had the option to require the Launch Provider to make four additional launches
of six satellites each. The total contract price for the first four launches is
approximately $216.1 million. In July 2008, the Company amended its agreement
with the Launch Provider for the launch of the Company’s second-generation
satellites and certain pre and post-launch services. Under the amended terms,
the Company could defer payment on up to 75% of certain amounts due to the
Launch Provider. The deferred payments incurred annual interest at 8.5% to 12%
and became payable one month from the corresponding launch date. As of December
31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had approximately none and $47.3 million,
respectively, in deferred payments outstanding to the Launch Provider. In June
2009, the Company and the Launch Provider again amended their agreement reducing
the number of optional launches from four to one and modifying the agreement in
certain other respects including terminating the deferred payment provisions.
Notwithstanding the one optional launch, the Company is free to contract
separately with the Launch Provider or another provider of launch services after
the Launch Provider’s firm launch commitments are fulfilled.
In May
2008, the Company and Hughes Network Systems, LLC (Hughes) entered into an
agreement under which Hughes will design, supply and implement the Radio Access
Network (RAN) ground network equipment and software upgrades for installation at
a number of the Company’s satellite gateway ground stations and satellite
interface chips to be a part of the User Terminal Subsystem (UTS) in various
next-generation Globalstar devices. In January 2010, the Company issued an
authorization to proceed on $2.7 million of new features which will result in a
revised total contract purchase price of approximately $103.5 million, payable
in various increments over a period of 57 months. The Company has the option to
purchase additional RANs and other software and hardware improvements at
pre-negotiated prices. In August 2009, the Company and Hughes amended their
agreement extending the performance schedule by 15 months and revising certain
payment milestones. Capitalization of costs has begun based upon reaching
technological feasibility of the project. As of December 31, 2009, the Company
had made payments of $35.0 million under this contract and expensed $5.7 million
of these payments, capitalized $21.8 million under second-generation satellites,
ground and related launch costs and $7.5 million is classified as a prepayment
in other assets, net.
In
October 2008, the Company signed an agreement with Ericsson Federal Inc., a
leading global provider of technology and services to telecom operators. In
December 2009, the Company amended this contract to increase its obligations by
$5.1 million for additional deliverables and features. According to the $27.8
million contract, Ericsson will work with the Company to develop, implement and
maintain a ground interface, or core network, system that will be installed at
the Company’s satellite gateway ground stations.
As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, capitalized interest recorded was $75.1 million and
$39.2 million, respectively. Interest capitalized during 2009 and 2008 was $35.9
million and $38.1 million, respectively. Depreciation expense for 2009 and 2008
was $21.8 million and $26.8 million, respectively.
5.
ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Accrued
interest
|
$ | 7,434 | $ | 14,957 | ||||
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
3,404 | 3,413 | ||||||
Accrued
property and other taxes
|
3,939 | 3,182 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
2,581 | 2,666 | ||||||
Accrued
professional fees
|
1,641 | 1,168 | ||||||
Accrued
acquisition costs
|
1,910 | — | ||||||
Accrued
commissions
|
391 | 448 | ||||||
Accrued
telecom
|
478 | 433 | ||||||
Warranty
reserve
|
150 | 101 | ||||||
Accrued
second-generation construction and spare satellite launch
costs
|
4,109 | 35 | ||||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
4,483 | 3,595 | ||||||
|
$ | 30,520 | $ | 29,998 |
Other
accrued expenses primarily include outsourced logistics services, storage,
maintenance, and roaming charges.
Warranty
terms extend from 90 days on equipment accessories to one year for fixed and
mobile user terminals. An accrual is made when it is estimable and probable that
a loss has been incurred based on historical experience. Warranty costs are
accrued based on historical trends in warranty charges as a percentage of gross
product shipments. A provision for estimated future warranty costs is recorded
as cost of sales when products are shipped. The resulting accrual is reviewed
regularly and periodically adjusted to reflect changes in warranty cost
estimates. The following is a summary of the activity in the warranty reserve
account (in thousands):
14
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | 101 | $ | 235 | $ | 879 | ||||||
Provision
|
96 | 67 | (177 | ) | ||||||||
Utilization
|
(47 | ) | (201 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 150 | $ | 101 | $ | 235 |
6.
PAYABLES TO AFFILIATES
Payables
to affiliates relate to normal purchase transactions, excluding interest, and
were $0.5 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Thermo
incurs certain general and administrative expenses on behalf of the Company,
which are charged to the Company. For 2009, 2008 and 2007, total expenses were
approximately $146,000, $219,000 and $182,000, respectively. For 2009, 2008 and
2007, the Company also recorded $337,000, $449,000 and $420,000, respectively,
of non-cash expenses related to services provided by two executive officers of
Thermo (who are also Directors of the Company) who receive no cash compensation
from the Company which were accounted for as a contribution to capital. The
Thermo expense charges are based on actual amounts incurred or upon allocated
employee time. Management believes the allocations are reasonable.
7.
PENSIONS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Pensions
Until
June 1, 2004, substantially all Old and New Globalstar employees and retirees
who participated and/or met the vesting criteria for the plan were participants
in the Retirement Plan of Space Systems/Loral (the “Loral Plan”), a defined
benefit pension plan. The accrual of benefits in the Old Globalstar segment of
the Loral Plan was curtailed, or frozen, by the administrator of the Loral Plan
as of October 23, 2003. Prior to October 23, 2003, benefits for the Loral Plan
were generally based upon contributions, length of service with the Company and
age of the participant. On June 1, 2004, the assets and frozen pension
obligations of the Globalstar Segment of the Loral Plan were transferred into a
new Globalstar Retirement Plan (the “Globalstar Plan”). The Globalstar Plan
remains frozen and participants are not currently accruing benefits beyond those
accrued as of October 23, 2003. Globalstar’s funding policy is to fund the
Globalstar Plan in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and
regulations.
Components
of the net periodic pension cost of the Company’s contributory defined benefit
pension plan for the years ended December 31, were as follows (in
thousands):
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Interest
and service cost
|
$ | 805 | $ | 759 | $ | 761 | ||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(634 | ) | (843 | ) | (802 | ) | ||||||
Actuarial
loss, net
|
296 | 16 | 62 | |||||||||
Net
periodic pension cost (income)
|
$ | 467 | $ | (68 | ) | $ | 21 |
As of the
measurement date (December 31), the status of the Company’s defined benefit
pension plan was as follows (in thousands):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Benefit
obligation, beginning of year
|
$ | 13,453 | $ | 13,183 | ||||
Interest
and service cost
|
805 | 759 | ||||||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
983 | 248 | ||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(807 | ) | (737 | ) | ||||
Benefit
obligation, end of year
|
$ | 14,434 | $ | 13,453 | ||||
Fair
value of plan assets, beginning of year
|
$ | 8,671 | $ | 11,404 | ||||
Actual
return (loss) on plan assets
|
1,728 | (2,441 | ) | |||||
Employer
contributions
|
343 | 444 | ||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(807 | ) | (736 | ) | ||||
Fair
value of plan assets, end of year
|
$ | 9,935 | $ | 8,671 | ||||
Funded
status, end of year
|
$ | (4,499 | ) | $ | (4,782 | ) | ||
Unrecognized
net actuarial loss
|
4,773 | 5,180 | ||||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$ | 274 | $ | 398 | ||||
Amounts
recognized on the balance sheet consist of:
|
||||||||
Accrued
pension liability
|
$ | (4,499 | ) | $ | (4,782 | ) | ||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
4,773 | 5,180 | ||||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$ | 274 | $ | 398 |
15
At
December 31, 2009, and 2008, the fair value of plan assets less benefit
obligation was recognized as a non-current liability on the Company’s balance
sheet in the amount of $4.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
The
assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at December 31 were as
follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Discount
rate
|
5.60 | % | 5.75 | % | ||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
N/A | N/A |
The
principal actuarial assumptions to determine net period benefit cost for the
years ended December 31 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
5.75 | % | 6.00 | % | 5.75 | % | ||||||
Expected
rate of return on plan assets
|
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
The
assumptions, investment policies and strategies for the Globalstar Plan are
determined by the Globalstar Plan Committee. Prior to June 1, 2004, the
assumptions, investment policies and strategies for the Globalstar segment of
the Loral Plan were determined by the Loral Plan Committee. The expected
long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is selected by taking into
account the expected duration of the projected benefit obligation for the plans,
the asset mix of the plans and the fact that the plan assets are actively
managed to mitigate risk.
The plan
assets are invested in various mutual funds which have quoted prices. The
defined benefit pension plan asset allocation as of the measurement date
(December 31) and the target asset allocation, presented as a percentage of
total plan assets were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
Target
Allocation
|
||||||||||
Debt
securities
|
40 | % | 50 | % | 35% – 50 | % | ||||||
Equity
securities
|
57 | % | 47 | % | 50% – 60 | % | ||||||
Other
investments
|
3 | % | 3 | % | 0% – 5 | % | ||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % |
The
benefit payments to retirees are expected to be paid as follows (in
thousands):
Years
Ending December 31,
|
|
|||
2010
|
$ | 792 | ||
2011
|
822 | |||
2012
|
843 | |||
2013
|
862 | |||
2014
|
879 | |||
2015 – 2019
|
$ | 4,487 |
For 2009
and 2008, the Company contributed $343,000 and $444,000, respectively, to the
Globalstar Plan. The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately
$278,000 to the Globalstar Plan in 2010.
Other
Employee Plans
The
Company has established various other employee benefit plans, which include an
employee incentive program, and other employee/management incentive compensation
plans. The employee/management compensation plans are based upon annual
performance measures and other criteria and are paid in shares of the Company’s
common stock. The total expenses related to these plans for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $9.9 million, $12.5 million and $9.6
million, respectively.
On August
1, 2001, Old Globalstar adopted a defined contribution employee savings plan, or
“401(k),” which provided that Old Globalstar would match the contributions of
participating employees up to a designated level. Prior to August 1, 2001, Old
Globalstar’s employees participated in the Loral 401(k) plan. This plan was
continued by New Globalstar. Under this plan, the matching contributions were
approximately $395,000, $508,000 and $341,000 for 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
8.
TAXES
Until
January 1, 2006, the Company and its U.S. operating subsidiaries were treated as
partnerships for U.S. tax purposes. Generally, taxable income or loss,
deductions and credits of the partnership are passed through to its partners.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company elected to be taxed as a C corporation
for U.S. tax purposes, and the Company and its U.S. operating subsidiaries began
accounting for income taxes as a corporation.
16
The
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
basis, operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. The Company measures
deferred tax assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The Company recognizes the effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
The
Company also recognizes valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to
the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the
likelihood of realization, management considers: (i) future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences; (ii) future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carry-forwards; (iii) taxable income in
prior carry-back year(s) if carry-back is permitted under applicable tax law;
and (iv) tax planning strategies.
The
components of income tax expense (benefit) were as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Current:
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Federal
tax (benefit)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
State
tax
|
85 | 21 | 98 | |||||||||
Foreign
tax
|
(101 | ) | (1,302 | ) | 3,320 | |||||||
Total
|
(16 | ) | (1,281 | ) | 3,418 | |||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
Federal
and state tax (benefit)
|
— | (2,763 | ) | — | ||||||||
Foreign
tax (benefit)
|
0 | 1,761 | (554 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
0 | (1,002 | ) | (554 | ) | |||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | (16 | ) | $ | (2,283 | ) | $ | 2,864 |
U.S. and
foreign components of income (loss) before income taxes are presented below (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
U.S.
income (loss)
|
$ | (69,490 | ) | $ | (6,628 | ) | $ | (17,545 | ) | |||
Foreign
income (loss)
|
(5,449 | ) | (18,447 | ) | (7,516 | ) | ||||||
Total
income (loss) before income taxes
|
$ | (74,939 | ) | $ | (25,075 | ) | $ | (25,061 | ) |
As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had cumulative U.S. and foreign net operating
loss carry-forwards for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $300.7
million and $ 63.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had cumulative U.S. and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards for income tax
reporting purposes of approximately $ 196.0 million and $52.8 million,
respectively. The net operating loss carry-forwards expire on various dates
beginning in 2010. A small amount of the net operating loss carryforwards do not
expire which are some of the foreign carryforwards.
The
Company has not provided for United States income taxes and foreign withholding
taxes on approximately $2.9 million of undistributed earnings from certain
foreign subsidiaries indefinitely invested outside the United States. Should the
Company decide to repatriate these foreign earnings, the Company would have to
adjust the income tax provision in the period in which management believes the
Company would repatriate the earnings.
Commencing
in May 2008, the Company issued $150.0 million of 5.75% Notes. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, some of these note holders converted or exchanged their 5.75%
Notes for common stock, which resulted in a taxable gain in the U.S. of
approximately $71.8 million. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC 470-20,
which was effective retrospectively. Prior to this adoption, the Company had
recorded the net tax effect of the conversions and exchanges of the 5.75% Notes
during the fourth quarter of 2008 against additional-paid-in-capital and reduced
its deferred tax asset at December 31, 2008. The adoption resulted in the
Company’s recording of a gain from the exchanges and conversions of the 5.75%
Notes.
The
components of net deferred income tax assets were as follows (in
thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Federal
and foreign net operating loss and credit carry-forwards
|
$ | 134,756 | $ | 75,121 | ||||
Property
and equipment and other long term
|
3,786 | 35,286 | ||||||
Accruals
and reserves
|
9,855 | 12,214 | ||||||
Deferred
tax assets before valuation allowance
|
148,397 | 122,621 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(148,397 | ) | (122,621 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred income tax assets
|
$ | — | $ | — |
17
The
change in the valuation allowance during 2009 and 2008 was $25.8 million and
$0.2 million, respectively.
The
actual provision for income taxes differs from the statutory U.S. federal income
tax rate as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Provision
at U.S. statutory rate of 35%
|
$ | (26,227 | ) | $ | (6,106 | ) | $ | (8,762 | ) | |||
Nontaxable
partnership interest
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
State
income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
(4,086 | ) | 60 | (1,053 | ) | |||||||
Incorporation
of U.S. company
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Change
in valuation allowance
|
25,776 | 1,698 | 7,195 | |||||||||
Effect
of foreign income tax at various rates
|
594 | 759 | 1,664 | |||||||||
Permanent
differences
|
579 | 1,322 | 1,072 | |||||||||
Other
(including amounts related to prior year tax matters)
|
3,348 | (16 | ) | 2,748 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | (16 | ) | $ | (2,283 | ) | $ | 2,864 |
Tax
Audits
The
Company operates in various U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. The process of
determining its anticipated tax liabilities involves many calculations and
estimates which are inherently complex. The Company believes that it has
complied in all material respects with its obligations to pay taxes in these
jurisdictions. However, its position is subject to review and possible challenge
by the taxing authorities of these jurisdictions. If the applicable taxing
authorities were to challenge successfully its current tax positions, or if
there were changes in the manner in which we conduct its activities, the Company
could become subject to material unanticipated tax liabilities. It may also
become subject to additional tax liabilities as a result of changes in tax laws,
which could in certain circumstances have a retroactive effect.
A tax
authority has previously notified the Company that the Company (formerly known
as Globalstar LLC), one of its subsidiaries, and its predecessor, Globalstar
L.P., were under audit for the taxable years ending December 31, 2005, December
31, 2004, and June 29, 2004, respectively. During the taxable years at issue,
the Company, its predecessor, and its subsidiary were treated as partnerships
for U.S. income tax purposes. In December 2009, the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) issued Notices of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustments related
to each of the taxable years at issue. The Company disagrees with the proposed
adjustments, and intends to pursue the matter through applicable IRS and
judicial procedures as appropriate.
As a
result of the Company not yet realizing any current tax benefits related to the
deductions from the proposed adjustments, the Company would not incur any
current additional tax as a result of any adjustment. However, if there is any
adjustment to the basis of the assets, this could reduce the Company’s net
operating losses and allowed deductions in future years which could negatively
impact its future cash flow. The potential impact of such a possibility has been
considered in the Company’s analysis and it has adjusted its gross deferred tax
asset before valuation allowance to a tax position that is more likely than not
to be sustained.
Except
for the IRS audit noted above, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries
are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or by any
state jurisdiction in the United States. The Company’s corporate U.S. tax
returns for 2006 and 2007 and its U.S. partnership tax returns filed for years
prior to 2006 remain subject to examination by tax authorities. State income tax
returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years
after filing of the respective return. The state impact of any federal changes
remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year
after formal notification to the states.
In the
Company’s international tax jurisdictions, numerous tax years remain subject to
examination by tax authorities, including tax returns for 2001 and subsequent
years in most of the Company’s international tax jurisdictions.
The
reconciliation of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in
thousands):
2009
|
||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 80,791 | ||
Gross
increases (decrease) based on tax positions related to current
year
|
(2,011 | ) | ||
Reductions
to tax positions related to prior years Audit settlements paid during
2009
|
0 | |||
Gross
unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 78,780 |
The total
unrecognized tax benefit of $78.7 million at December 31, 2009 included $6.3
million which, if recognized, could potentially reduce the effective income tax
rate in future periods.
18
In
connection with the FIN 48 adjustment, at December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company recorded interest and penalties of $1.2 million and $0.8 million,
respectively.
It is
anticipated that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit reflected at December
31, 2009 will not materially change in the next 12 months; any changes are not
anticipated to have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial
position or cash flows of the Company.
The
Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating its tax positions
and determining its provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of
business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate
tax determination is uncertain.
9.
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The
revenue by geographic location is presented net of eliminations for intercompany
sales, and is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Service:
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 29,994 | $ | 32,092 | $ | 43,214 | ||||||
Canada
|
12,774 | 19,500 | 26,445 | |||||||||
Central
and South America
|
4,778 | 5,947 | 2,883 | |||||||||
Europe
|
2,338 | 3,521 | 4,692 | |||||||||
Others
|
344 | 734 | 1,079 | |||||||||
Total
service revenue
|
50,228 | 61,794 | 78,313 | |||||||||
Subscriber
equipment:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
5,395 | 12,513 | 7,303 | |||||||||
Canada
|
2,815 | 6,886 | 5,656 | |||||||||
Central
and South America
|
1,584 | 2,601 | 1,161 | |||||||||
Europe
|
800 | 1,895 | 5,334 | |||||||||
Others
|
3,457 | 366 | 631 | |||||||||
Total
subscriber equipment revenue
|
14,051 | 24,261 | 20,085 | |||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 64,279 | $ | 86,055 | $ | 98,398 |
The
long-lived assets (property and equipment) by geographic location are as follows
(in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Long-lived
assets:
|
|
|
||||||
United
States
|
$ | 955,105 | $ | 633,624 | ||||
Central
and South America
|
6,879 | 7,082 | ||||||
Canada
|
650 | 919 | ||||||
Europe
|
26 | 130 | ||||||
Others
|
2,261 | 2,276 | ||||||
Total
long-lived assets
|
$ | 964,921 | $ | 644,031 |
10.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Since
2005, Globalstar has issued separate purchase orders for additional phone
equipment and accessories under the terms of previously executed commercial
agreements with Qualcomm. Within the terms of the commercial agreements, the
Company paid Qualcomm approximately 7.5% to 25% of the total order as advances
for inventory. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, total advances to Qualcomm for
inventory were $9.2 million. As of each of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company had outstanding commitment balances of approximately $49.4 million. On
October 28, 2008, the Company amended its agreement with Qualcomm to extend the
term for 12 months and defer delivery of mobile phones and related equipment
until April 2010 through July 2011.
On August
16, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with
Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC, as administrative agent and swingline lender,
and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as issuing lender, which was
subsequently amended on September 29 and October 26, 2006. On December 17, 2007,
Thermo was assigned all the rights (except indemnification rights) and assumed
all the obligations of the administrative agent and the lenders under the
amended and restated credit agreement, and the credit agreement was again
amended and restated. In connection with fulfilling the conditions precedent to
funding under the Company’s Facility Agreement, in June 2009, Thermo converted
the loans outstanding under the credit agreement into equity and terminated the
credit agreement. In addition, Thermo and its affiliates deposited $60.0 million
in a contingent equity account to fulfill a condition precedent for borrowing
under the Facility Agreement, purchased $11.4 million of the Company’s 8% Notes,
provided a $2.3 million short-term loan to the Company, and loaned $25.0 million
to the Company to fund its debt service reserve account (See Note 15
“Borrowings”).
19
During
2009 and 2008, the Company purchased approximately $3.7 million and $7.7
million, respectively, of services and equipment from a company whose
non-executive chairman serves as a member of the Company’s board of
directors.
Purchases
and other transactions with affiliates
Total
purchases and other transactions from affiliates, excluding interest and capital
transactions, were $4.0 million and $7.9 million for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
11.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Future
Minimum Lease Obligations
Globalstar
currently has several operating leases for facilities throughout the United
States and around the world, including California, Florida, Texas, Canada,
Ireland, France, Venezuela, Brazil, Panama, and Singapore. The leases expire on
various dates through August 2015. The following table presents the future
minimum lease payments (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
|
||||
2010
|
$ | 1,619 | ||
2011
|
1,071 | |||
2012
|
1,035 | |||
2013
|
748 | |||
2014
|
192 | |||
Thereafter
|
116 | |||
Total
minimum lease payments
|
$ | 4,781 |
Rent
expense for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were approximately $1.8 million, $1.6 million
and $1.4 million, respectively.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company has purchase commitments with Thales, Arianespace, Ericsson, Hughes and
other venders totaling approximately $219.8 million, $184.4 million, $110.7
million, $83.4 million and $13.9 million in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and
thereafter, respectively. The Company expects to fund its long-term capital
needs with any remaining funds available under its Facility Agreement, cash
flow, which it expects will be generated primarily from sales of its Simplex
products and services, including its SPOT satellite GPS messenger products and
services, and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, additional equity
financings or a combination of these potential sources of funds.
Litigation
From time
to time, the Company is involved in various litigation matters involving
ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business. Management currently
believes that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
results of operations or financial condition. The Company is involved in certain
litigation matters as discussed below.
IPO Securities Litigation.
On February 9, 2007, the first of three purported class action
lawsuits was filed against the Company, its then-current CEO and CFO in the
Southern District of New York alleging that the Company’s registration statement
related to its initial public offering in November 2006 contained material
misstatements and omissions. The Court consolidated the three cases as Ladmen
Partners, Inc. v. Globalstar, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:07-CV-0976 (LAP), and
appointed Connecticut Laborers’ Pension Fund as lead plaintiff. The parties and
the Company’s insurer have agreed to a settlement of the litigation for $1.5
million to be paid by the insurer, which received the presiding judge’s
preliminary approval on September 18, 2009. After a hearing on February 18,
2010, the judge approved the settlement.
Walsh and Kesler v. Globalstar, Inc.
(formerly Stickrath v. Globalstar, Inc.). On April 7, 2007,
Kenneth Stickrath and Sharan Stickrath filed a purported class action complaint
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California, Case No. 07-cv-01941. The complaint is based on alleged violations
of California Business & Professions Code § 17200 and California Civil Code
§ 1750, et seq., the Consumers’ Legal Remedies Act. In July 2008, the Company
filed a motion to deny class certification and a motion for summary judgment.
The court deferred action on the class certification issue but granted the
motion for summary judgment on December 22, 2008. The court did not, however,
dismiss the case with prejudice but rather allowed counsel for plaintiffs to
amend the complaint and substitute one or more new class representatives. On
January 16, 2009, counsel for the plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Class Action
Complaint substituting Messrs. Walsh and Kesler as the named plaintiffs. A joint
notice of settlement was filed with the court on March 9, 2010. The Company has
recorded a liability for this settlement; however, the amount is not
material.
Appeal of FCC S-Band Sharing
Decision. This case is Sprint Nextel Corporation’s petition
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of,
among others, the FCC’s April 27, 2006, decision regarding sharing of the
2495-2500 MHz portion of the Company’s radiofrequency spectrum. This is known as
“The S-band Sharing Proceeding.” The Court of Appeals has granted the FCC’s
motion to hold the case in abeyance while the FCC considers the petitions for
reconsideration pending before it. The Court has also granted the Company’s
motion to intervene as a party in the case. The Company cannot determine when
the FCC might act on the petitions for reconsideration.
20
Appeal of FCC L-Band
Decision. On November 9, 2007, the FCC released a Second
Order on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order and Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. In the Report and Order (“R&O”) portion of the decision, the FCC
effectively decreased the L-band spectrum available to the Company while
increasing the L-band spectrum available to Iridium Communications by 2.625 MHz.
On February 5, 2008, the Company filed a notice of appeal of the FCC’s decision
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Briefs were filed and oral
argument was held on February 17, 2009. On May 1, 2009, the court issued a
decision denying the Company’s appeal and affirming the FCC’s decision.
Globalstar has not undertaken any further appeals.
Appeal of FCC ATC Decision.
On October 31, 2008, the FCC issued an Order granting the Company
modified Ancillary Terrestrial Component (“ATC”) authority. The modified
authority allows the Company and Open Range Communications, Inc. to implement
their plan to roll out ATC service in rural areas of the United States. On
December 1, 2008, Iridium Communications filed a petition with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the FCC’s Order. On
the same day, CTIA-The Wireless Association petitioned the FCC to reconsider its
Order. The court has granted the FCC’s motion to hold the appeal in abeyance
pending the FCC’s decision on reconsideration.
Sorensen Research & Development
Trust v. Axonn LLC, et al. On July 2, 2008, the Company’s
subsidiary, Spot LLC, received a notice of patent infringement from Sorensen
Research and Development. Sorensen asserts that the process used to manufacture
the SPOT satellite GPS messenger violates a U.S. patent held by Sorensen. The
manufacturer, Axonn LLC, has assumed responsibility for managing the case under
an indemnity agreement with the Company and Spot LLC. Axonn was unable to
negotiate a mutually acceptable settlement with Sorensen, and on January 14,
2009, Sorensen filed a complaint against Axonn, Spot LLC and the Company in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The Company and
Axonn filed an answer and counterclaim and a motion to stay the proceeding
pending completion of the re-examination of the subject patent. The court
granted the motion for stay on July 29, 2009. In connection with the Company’s
acquisition of Axonn’s assets in December 2009, Axonn agreed to continue to be
responsible for this case, subject to certain limitations. If Axonn fails to
perform this obligation, however, the Company’s recourse is generally limited to
seeking recovery from its stock held in escrow or reducing the earnout payments
that may otherwise be owed to Axonn under the acquisition
agreement.
YMax Communications Corp. v.
Globalstar, Inc. and Spot LLC. On May 6, 2009, YMax
Communications Corp. filed a patent infringement complaint against the Company
and its subsidiary, Spot LLC, in the Delaware U.S. District Court (Civ. Action
No. 09-329) alleging that the SPOT satellite GPS messenger service infringes a
patent for which YMax is the exclusive licensee. The complaint followed an
exchange of correspondence between the Company and YMax in which the Company
endeavored to explain why the SPOT service does not infringe the YMax patent.
Globalstar filed its answer to the complaint on June 26, 2009. On February 11,
2010, the Company and Ymax agreed to settle the dispute on mutually acceptable
terms, and on February 17 the court approved the settlement. The Company has
recorded a liability for this settlement; however, the amount is not
material.
12.
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
The
Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Plan) is a broad based,
long-term retention program intended to attract and retain talented employees
and align stockholder and employee interests. In January 2008, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the addition of approximately 1.7 million shares of
the Company’s common stock to the shares available for issuance under the Equity
Plan. The Company’s stockholders approved the Amended and Restated Equity Plan
on May 13, 2008, which added an additional 3.0 million shares of the Company’s
common stock to the shares available for issuance under the Equity Plan. In
January and August 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an additional
2.7 million shares and 10.0 million shares, respectively, of the Company’s
common stock to the shares available for issuance under the Equity Plan. At
December 31, 2009, the number of shares of common stock that remained available
for issuance under the Equity Plan was approximately 6.6 million. Equity awards
granted to employees in 2008 and 2009 under the Equity Plan consisted of
primarily restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. Equity awards
generally vest over a period of 2-5 years from the date of grant. The fair value
of the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is based upon the fair
value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
The
effect of recording stock based compensation expense for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
as follows (in millions):
For the year ended December 31, 2009
|
Stock
options
|
RSUs
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Cost
of services (includes research and development)
|
$ | — | $ | 2.2 | $ | 2.2 | ||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative
|
2.9 | 4.8 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Total
compensation expense
|
2.9 | 7.0 | 9.9 | |||||||||
Income
tax benefit
|
(0.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||||
Total
compensation expense, net of tax
|
$ | 2.6 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 8.9 |
For the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Stock
options
|
RSUs
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Cost
of services (includes research and development)
|
$ | — | $ | 2.9 | $ | 2.9 | ||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative
|
0.3 | 9.3 | 9.6 | |||||||||
Total
compensation expense
|
0.3 | 12.2 | 12.5 | |||||||||
Income
tax benefit
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||
Total
compensation expense, net of tax
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 11.6 | $ | 11.8 |
21
For the year ended December 31,
2007
|
Stock
options
|
RSUs
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Cost
of services (includes research and development)
|
$ | N/A | $ | 1.9 | $ | 1.9 | ||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative
|
N/A | 7.7 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Total
compensation expense
|
N/A | 9.6 | 9.6 | |||||||||
Income
tax benefit
|
N/A | (0.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | |||||||
Total
compensation expense, net of tax
|
$ | N/A | $ | 9.2 | $ | 9.2 |
At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the amount related to non-vested shares expected to
be amortized over the remaining vesting period was $14.5 million and $13.7
million, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average
remaining vesting term of the non-vested shares was 2.1 years and 1.2 years,
respectively.
The fair
value of stock based awards was estimated using either a Black-Scholes model or
a Binomial Lattice model, both of which requires the use of employee exercise
behavior data and the use of assumptions including expected volatility,
risk-free interest rate, turnover rates and dividends. The table below
summarizes the range of assumptions used to determine the fair value the stock
based awards and the related weighted average fair values:
Years
Ended
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Options
|
RSUs
|
Options
|
RSUs
|
Options
|
RSUs
|
||||||||||||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
60% – 120 | % | N/A | 60% – 120 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
<1
|
% |
<1
|
% | 1% – 3 | % | 1% – 3 | % | N/A | 1% – 3 | % | |||||||||||||
Turnover
rate
|
0% – 9 | % | 0% – 9 | % | 0% – 7 | % | 0% – 7 | % | N/A | 0% – 7 | % | |||||||||||||
Dividends
|
— | — | — | — | N/A | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected
life of options (years)
|
2 – 10 | 1 – 3 | 2 – 10 | 1 – 3 | N/A | 1 – 3 |
The
Company adjusts its estimates of expected equity awards forfeitures based upon
its review of recent forfeiture activity and expected future employee turnover.
The effect of adjusting the forfeiture rate for all expense is recognized in the
period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. The effect of forfeiture
adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.5 million and
$1.4 million, respectively. The effect of changes to the forfeiture estimates
during the year ended December 31, 2007 was insignificant.
Effective
August 10, 2007 (the “Effective Date”), the board of directors, upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the concurrent
termination of the Company’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and awards of
restricted stock or restricted stock units under the Company’s 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan to five executive officers (the “Participants”). Each award
agreement provides that the recipient will receive awards of restricted common
stock (or, for the non-U.S. Participant, restricted stock units, which upon
vesting, each entitle him to one share of Globalstar common stock). Total
benefits per Participant (valued at the grant date) are approximately $6.0
million, which represents an increase of approximately $1.5 million in potential
compensation compared to the maximum potential benefits under the Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan. However, the new award agreements extend the
vesting period by up to two years through 2011 and provide for payment in shares
of common stock instead of cash, thereby enabling the Company to conserve its
cash for capital expenditures for the procurement and launch of its
second-generation satellite constellation and related ground station upgrades.
At December 31, 2009, the amount related to non-vested share awards related to
the Company’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plan expected to be amortized
over the remaining vesting period was $3.9 million.
A summary
of the nonvested shares under the Company’s restricted stock and restricted unit
awards and changes during the years, is presented below:
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued Nonvested
Restricted Stock
Awards and
Restricted Stock
Units
|
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1
|
2,483,412 | $ | 8.92 | 1,618,743 | $ | 15.00 | 221,873 | $ | 15.00 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
9,076,652 | 0.88 | 2,297,173 | 4.12 | 1,470,138 | 10.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested
|
(7,818,773 | ) | 0.79 | (1,387,668 | ) | 3.44 | (50,095 | ) | 9.97 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(179,562 | ) | 8.77 | (44,836 | ) | 9.71 | (23,173 | ) | 14.41 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31
|
3,561,729 | $ | 6.29 | 2,483,412 | $ | 8.92 | 1,618,743 | $ | 11.06 |
22
13.
DERIVATIVES
In July
2006, in connection with entering into its credit agreement with Wachovia, which
provided for interest at a variable rate (See Note 15 “Borrowings”), the Company
entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement. The interest rate swap
agreement reflected a $100.0 million notional amount at a fixed interest rate of
5.64%. The interest rate swap agreement did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment. The decline in fair value for 2008 was charged to “Derivative loss,
net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The interest
rate swap agreement was terminated on December 10, 2008, by the Company making a
payment of approximately $9.2 million.
In June
2009, in connection with entering into the Facility Agreement (See Note 15
“Borrowings”), which provides for interest at a variable rate, the Company
entered into ten-year interest rate cap agreements. The interest rate cap
agreements reflect a variable notional amount ranging from $586.3 million to
$14.8 million at interest rates that provide coverage to the Company for
exposure resulting from escalating interest rates over the term of the Facility
Agreement. The interest rate cap provides limits on the six-month Libor rate
(“Base Rate”) used to calculate the coupon interest on outstanding amounts on
the Facility Agreement of 4.00% from the date of issuance through December 2012.
Thereafter, the Base Rate is capped at 5.50% should the Base Rate not exceed
6.5%. Should the Base Rate exceed 6.5%, the Company’s Base Rate will be 1% less
than the then six-month Libor rate. The Company paid an approximately $12.4
million upfront fee for the interest rate cap agreements. The interest rate cap
did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and changes in the fair value of
the agreements are included in “Derivative loss, net” in the accompanying
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The
Company recorded the conversion rights and features embedded within the 8.00%
Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes (“8.00% Notes”) as a compound embedded
derivative liability within Other Non-Current Liabilities on its Consolidated
Balance Sheet with a corresponding debt discount which is netted against the
face value of the 8.00% Notes (See Note 15 “Borrowings”). The Company is
accreting the debt discount associated with the compound embedded derivative
liability to interest expense over the term of the 8.00% Notes using the
effective interest rate method. The fair value of the compound embedded
derivative liability will be marked-to-market at the end of each reporting
period, with any changes in value reported as “Derivative loss, net” in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company determined the fair value of
the compound embedded derivative using a Monte Carlo simulation model based upon
a risk-neutral stock price model.
Due to
the cash settlement provisions and reset features in the warrants issued with
the 8.00% Notes (See Note 15 “Borrowings”), the Company recorded the warrants as
Other Non-Current Liabilities on its Consolidated Balance Sheet with a
corresponding debt discount which is netted against the face value of the 8.00%
Notes. The Company is accreting the debt discount associated with the warrant
liability to interest expense over the term of the warrants using the effective
interest rate method. The fair value of the warrant liability will be
marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with any changes in value
reported as “Derivative loss, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company determined the fair value of the Warrant derivative using a Monte
Carlo simulation model based upon a risk-neutral stock price model.
The
Company determined that the warrants issued in conjunction with the availability
fee for the Contingent Equity Agreement (See Note 15 “Borrowings”), were a
liability and recorded it as a component of Other Non-Current Liabilities, at
issuance. The corresponding benefit is recorded in prepaid and other non-current
assets and is being amortized over the one-year availability period. The fair
value of the warrant liability will be marked-to-market at the end of each
reporting period, with any changes in value reported as “Derivative loss, net”
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company determined the fair
value of the Warrant derivative using a risk-neutral binomial
model.
None of
the derivative instruments described above was designated as a hedge. The
following tables disclose the fair value of the derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and their impact on the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Operations for 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
December 31, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance
Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||
Interest
rate cap derivative
|
Other
assets, net
|
$ | 6,801 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Compound
embedded conversion option
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
(14,235 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Warrants
issued with 8.00% Notes
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
(27,711 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Warrants
issued in conjunction with contingent equity agreement
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
(7,809 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | (42,954 | ) | $ | N/A |
23
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||
|
Location of
Gain (loss)
recognized in
Statement of
Operations
|
Amount of
Gain (loss)
recognized on
Statement of
Operations
|
Location of
Gain (loss)
recognized in
Statement of
Operations
|
Amount of
Gain (loss)
recognized on
Statement of
Operations
|
||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap derivative
|
N/A | N/A |
Derivative
loss, net
|
$ | (3,259 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest
rate cap derivative
|
Derivative
loss, net
|
(5,624 | ) |
N/A
|
N/A | |||||||||||
Compound
embedded conversion option
|
Derivative
loss, net
|
2,997 |
N/A
|
N/A | ||||||||||||
Warrants
issued with 8.00% Notes
|
Derivative
loss, net
|
(14,920 | ) |
N/A
|
N/A | |||||||||||
Warrants
issued in conjunction with contingent equity agreement
|
Derivative
loss, net
|
1,962 |
N/A
|
N/A | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (15,585 | ) | $ | (3,259 | ) |
14.
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The
components of other comprehensive loss were as follows (in
thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Accumulated
minimum pension liability adjustment
|
$ | (4,773 | ) | $ | (5,180 | ) | ||
Accumulated
net foreign currency translation adjustment
|
3,055 | (1,124 | ) | |||||
Total
accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$ | (1,718 | ) | $ | (6,304 | ) |
15.
BORROWINGS
Current
portion of long term debt
The
current portion of long term debt at December 31, 2009 consisted of a loan of
$2.3 million from Thermo which is payable within one year at an annual interest
rate of 12%. The current portion of long term debt at December 31, 2008
consisted of $33.6 million due to the Company’s vendors under vendor financing
agreements. Details of vendor financing agreements are described later in this
Note.
Long
Term Debt:
Long term
debt consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement:
|
||||||||
Term
Loan
|
$ | — | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Revolving
credit loans
|
— | 66,050 | ||||||
Total
Borrowings under Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
|
— | 166,050 | ||||||
5.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
|
53,359 | 48,670 | ||||||
8.00%
Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes
|
17,396 | — | ||||||
Vendor
Financing (long term portion)
|
— | 23,625 | ||||||
Facility
Agreement
|
371,219 | — | ||||||
Subordinated
loan
|
21,577 | — | ||||||
Total
long term debt
|
$ | 463,551 | $ | 238,345 |
Borrowings
under Facility Agreement
On June
5, 2009, the Company entered into a $586.3 million senior secured facility
agreement (the “Facility Agreement”) with a syndicate of bank lenders, including
BNP Paribas, Natixis, Société Générale, Caylon, Crédit Industriel et Commercial
as arrangers and BNP Paribas as the security agent and COFACE agent. Ninety-five
percent of the Company’s obligations under the agreement are guaranteed by
COFACE, the French export credit agency. The initial funding process of the
Facility Agreement began on June 29, 2009 and was completed on July 1, 2009. The
facility is comprised of:
24
•
|
a $563.3 million tranche for
future payments and to reimburse the Company for amounts it previously
paid to Thales Alenia Space for construction of its second-generation
satellites. Such reimbursed amounts will be used by the Company (a) to
make payments to the Launch Provider for launch services, Hughes for
ground network equipment, software and satellite interface chips and
Ericsson for ground system upgrades, (b) to provide up to $150 million for
the Company’s working capital and general corporate purposes and (c) to
pay a portion of the insurance premium to COFACE;
and
|
•
|
a $23 million tranche that will
be used to make payments to the Launch Provider for launch services and to
pay a portion of the insurance premium to
COFACE.
|
The
facility will mature 96 months after the first repayment date. Scheduled
semi-annual principal repayments will begin the earlier of eight months after
the launch of the first 24 satellites from the second generation constellation
or December 15, 2011. The facility will bear interest at a floating LIBOR rate,
plus a margin of 2.07% through December 2012, increasing to 2.25% through
December 2017 and 2.40% thereafter. Interest payments will be due on a
semi-annual basis beginning January 2010.
The
Company’s obligations under the facility are guaranteed on a senior secured
basis by all of its domestic subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority
lien on substantially all of the assets of Globalstar and its domestic
subsidiaries (other than their FCC licenses), including patents and trademarks,
100% of the equity of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the equity
of certain foreign subsidiaries.
The
Company may prepay the borrowings without penalty on the last day of each
interest period after the full facility has been borrowed or the earlier of
seven months after the launch of the second generation constellation or November
15, 2011, but amounts repaid may not be reborrowed. The Company must repay the
loans (a) in full upon a change in control or (b) partially (i) if there are
excess cash flows on certain dates, (ii) upon certain insurance and condemnation
events and (iii) upon certain asset dispositions. The Facility Agreement
includes covenants that (a) require the Company to maintain a minimum liquidity
amount after the second repayment date, a minimum adjusted consolidated EBITDA,
a minimum debt service coverage ratio and a maximum net debt to adjusted
consolidated EBITDA ratio, (b) place limitations on the ability of the Company
and its subsidiaries to incur debt, create liens, dispose of assets, carry out
mergers and acquisitions, make loans, investments, distributions or other
transfers and capital expenditures or enter into certain transactions with
affiliates and (c) limit capital expenditures incurred by the Company to no more
than $391.0 million in 2009 and $234.0 million in 2010. The Company is permitted
to make cash payments under the terms of its 5.75% Notes. At December 31, 2009,
the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Facility
Agreement.
Subordinated
Loan Agreement
On June
25, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Thermo whereby Thermo
agreed to lend the Company $25 million for the purpose of funding the debt
service reserve account required under the Facility Agreement. This loan is
subordinated to, and the debt service reserve account is pledged to secure, all
of the Company’s obligations under the Facility Agreement. The loan accrues
interest at 12% per annum, which will be capitalized and added to the
outstanding principal in lieu of cash payments. The Company will make payments
to Thermo only when permitted under the Facility Agreement. The loan becomes due
and payable six months after the obligations under the Facility Agreement have
been paid in full, the Company has a change in control or any acceleration of
the maturity of the loans under the Facility Agreement occurs. As additional
consideration for the loan, the Company issued Thermo a warrant to purchase
4,205,608 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share with a five-year exercise
period. No common stock is issuable upon such exercise if such issuance would
cause Thermo and its affiliates to own more than 70% of the Company’s
outstanding voting stock.
Thermo
borrowed $20 million of the $25 million loaned to the Company under the Loan
Agreement from two Company vendors and also agreed to reimburse another Company
vendor if its guarantee of a portion of the debt service reserve account were
called. The debt service reserve account is included in restricted cash. The
Company agreed to grant one of these vendors a one-time option to convert its
debt into equity of the Company on the same terms as Thermo at the first call
(if any) by the Company for funds under the Contingent Equity Agreement
(described below).
The
Company determined that the warrant was an equity instrument and recorded it as
a part of its stockholders’ equity with a corresponding debt discount of $5.2
million, which is netted against the face value of the loan. The Company is
accreting the debt discount associated with the warrant to interest expense over
the term of the loan agreement using an effective interest rate method. At
issuance, the Company allocated the proceeds under the subordinated loan
agreement to the underlying debt and the warrants based upon their relative fair
values.
Contingent
Equity Agreement
On June
19, 2009, the Company entered into a Contingent Equity Agreement with Thermo
whereby Thermo agreed to deposit $60 million into a contingent equity account to
fulfill a condition precedent for borrowing under the Facility Agreement. Under
the terms of the Facility Agreement, the Company will be required to make
drawings from this account if and to the extent it has an actual or projected
deficiency in its ability to meet indebtedness obligations due within a
forward-looking 90 day period. Thermo has pledged the contingent equity account
to secure the Company’s obligations under the Facility Agreement. If the Company
makes any drawings from the contingent equity account, it will issue Thermo
shares of common stock calculated using a price per share equal to 80% of the
volume-weighted average closing price of the common stock for the 15 trading
days immediately preceding the draw. Thermo may withdraw undrawn amounts in the
account after the Company has made the second scheduled repayment under the
Facility Agreement, which the Company currently expects to be no later than June
15, 2012.
25
The
Contingent Equity Agreement also provides that the Company will pay Thermo an
availability fee of 10% per year for maintaining funds in the contingent equity
account. This fee is payable solely in warrants to purchase Common Stock at
$0.01 per share with a five-year exercise period from issuance. The number of
shares subject to the warrants issuable is calculated by taking the outstanding
funds available in the contingent equity account multiplied by 10% divided by
the Company’s common stock price on valuation dates. The common stock price is
subject to a reset provision on certain valuation dates subsequent to issuance
whereby the common stock price used in the calculation will be the lower of the
Company’s common stock price on the issuance date and the valuation dates. On
each of June 19, 2010 and June 19, 2011, additional warrants covering a number
of shares equal to 10% of the outstanding balance in the contingent equity
account divided by the Company’s common stock price on that date will be issued
and subject to the reset provision one year after initial issuance of the
warrants. On December 31, 2009, the common stock price used to calculate the
first tranche of warrants issued on June 19, 2009 was reset to $0.87 and will be
subject to another reset on June 19, 2010 should the common stock price be lower
than $0.87 per common share. The Company issued Thermo a warrant to purchase
4,379,562 shares of Common Stock for this fee at origination of the agreement
and on December 31, 2009 issued an additional warrant to purchase an additional
2,516,990 shares of common stock due to the reset provisions in the agreement.
No voting common stock is issuable if it would cause Thermo and its affiliates
to own more than 70% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock. The Company may
issue nonvoting common stock in lieu of common stock to the extent issuing
common stock would cause Thermo and its affiliates to exceed this 70% ownership
level.
The
Company determined that the warrants issued in conjunction with the availability
fee were a liability and recorded it as a component of Other Non-Current
Liabilities, at issuance. The corresponding benefit is recorded in other assets,
net and will be amortized over the one year of the availability
period.
8.00%
Convertible Senior Notes
On June
19, 2009, the Company sold $55 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.00%
Notes and warrants (Warrants) to purchase 15,277,771 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.80 per share to selected
institutional investors (including an affiliate of Thermo) in a direct offering
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The
Warrants have full ratchet anti-dilution protection, and the exercise price of
the Warrants is subject to adjustment under certain other circumstances. In
addition, if the closing price of the common stock on September 19, 2010 is less
than the exercise price of the Warrants then in effect, the exercise price of
the Warrants will be reset to equal the volume-weighted average closing price of
the common stock for the previous 15 trading days. In the event of certain
transactions that involve a change of control, the holders of the Warrants have
the right to make the Company purchase the Warrants for cash, subject to certain
conditions. The exercise period for the Warrants began on December 19, 2009 and
will end on June 19, 2014.
In
December 2009, the Company issued stock at $0.87 per share, which is below the
initial set price of $1.80 per share, in connection with its acquisition of the
assets of Axonn. Given this transaction and the related provisions in the
warrant agreements, the holders of the Warrants received additional warrants to
purchase 16.2 million shares of common stock. Additionally, the conversion price
of the 8.00% Notes, which are convertible into shares of common stock, was reset
to $1.78 per share of common stock.
The 8.00%
Notes are subordinated to all of the Company’s obligations under the Facility
Agreement. The 8.00% Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured debt obligations
and, except as described in the preceding sentence, rank pari passu with its
existing unsecured, unsubordinated obligations, including its 5.75% Notes. The
8.00% Notes mature at the later of the tenth anniversary of closing or six
months following the maturity date of the Facility Agreement and bear interest
at a rate of 8.00% per annum. Interest on the 8.00% Notes is payable in the form
of additional 8.00% Notes or, subject to certain restrictions, in common stock
at the option of the holder. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on
June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2009.
Holders
may convert their 8.00% Notes at any time. The current base conversion price for
the 8.00% Notes is $1.78 per share or 562.2 shares of the Company’s common stock
per $1,000 principal amount of the 8.00% Notes, subject to certain adjustments
and limitations. In addition, if the volume-weighted average closing price for
one share of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days immediately
preceding September 19, 2010 (“reset day price”) is less than the base
conversion price then in effect, the base conversion rate shall be adjusted to
equal the reset day price. If the Company issues or sells shares of its common
stock at a price per share less than the base conversion price on the trading
day immediately preceding such issuance or sale subject to certain limitations,
the base conversion rate will be adjusted lower based on a formula described in
the supplemental indenture governing the 8.00% Notes. However, no adjustment to
the base conversion rate shall be made if it would cause the Base Conversion
Price to be less than $1.00. If at any time the closing price of the common
stock exceeds 200% of the conversion price of the 8.00% Notes then in effect for
30 consecutive trading days, all of the outstanding 8.00% Notes will be
automatically converted into common stock. Upon certain automatic and optional
conversions of the 8.00% Notes, the Company will pay holders of the 8.00% Notes
a make-whole premium by increasing the number of shares of common stock
delivered upon such conversion. The number of additional shares per $1,000
principal amount of 8.00% Notes constituting the make-whole premium shall be
equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate principal amount of the 8.00% Notes
so converted multiplied by 32.00%, less the aggregate interest
paid on such Securities prior to the applicable Conversion Date divided by (ii) 95% of the
volume-weighted average Closing Price of the common stock for the 10 trading
days immediately preceding the Conversion Date. As of December 31, 2009,
approximately $10.7 million of the 8.00% Notes had been converted resulting in
the issuance of approximately 10.4 million shares of common stock. At December
31, 2009, $44.3 million in 8.00% Notes remained outstanding.
26
Subject
to certain exceptions set forth in the supplemental indenture, if certain
changes of control of the Company or events relating to the listing of the
common stock occur (a “fundamental change”), the 8.00% Notes are subject to
repurchase for cash at the option of the holders of all or any portion of the
8.00% Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
8.00% Notes, plus a make-whole payment and accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
Holders that require the Company to repurchase 8.00% Notes upon a fundamental
change may elect to receive shares of common stock in lieu of cash. Such holders
will receive a number of shares equal to (i) the number of shares they would
have been entitled to receive upon conversion of the 8.00% Notes, plus (ii) a
make-whole premium of 12% or 15%, depending on the date of the fundamental
change and the amount of the consideration, if any, received by the Company’s
stockholders in connection with the fundamental change.
The
indenture governing the 8.00% Notes contains customary financial reporting
requirements. The indenture also provides that upon certain events of default,
including without limitation failure to pay principal or interest, failure to
deliver a notice of fundamental change, failure to convert the 8.00% Notes when
required, acceleration of other material indebtedness and failure to pay
material judgments, either the trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the 8.00% Notes may declare the principal of the 8.00% Notes
and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration
immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or
insolvency relating to the Company or its significant subsidiaries, the
principal amount of the 8.00% Notes and accrued interest automatically becomes
due and payable.
The
Company evaluated the various embedded derivatives resulting from the conversion
rights and features within the Indenture for bifurcation from the 8.00% Notes.
Based upon its detailed assessment, the Company concluded that the conversion
rights and features could not be either excluded from bifurcation as a result of
being clearly and closely related to the 8.00% Notes or were not indexed to the
Company’s common stock and could not be classified in stockholders’ equity if
freestanding. The Company recorded this compound embedded derivative liability
as a component of Other Non-Current Liabilities on its Consolidated Balance
Sheet with a corresponding debt discount which is netted with the face value of
the 8.00% Notes. The Company is accreting the debt discount associated with the
compound embedded derivative liability to interest expense over the term of the
8.00% Notes using an effective interest rate method. The fair value of the
compound embedded derivative liability is being marked-to-market at the end of
each reporting period, with any changes in value reported as “Derivative loss,
net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company determined the
fair value of the compound embedded derivative using a Monte Carlo simulation
model based upon a risk-neutral stock price model.
Due to
the cash settlement provisions and reset features in the Warrants, the Company
recorded the Warrants as a component of Other Non-Current Liabilities on its
Consolidated Balance Sheet with a corresponding debt discount which is netted
with the face value of the 8.00% Notes. The Company is accreting the debt
discount associated with the Warrants liability to interest expense over the
term of the 8.00% Notes using an effective interest rate method. The fair value
of the Warrants liability will be marked-to-market at the end of each reporting
period, with any changes in value reported as “Derivative loss, net” in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company determined the fair value of
the Warrants derivative using a Monte Carlo simulation model based upon a
risk-neutral stock price model.
The
Company allocated the proceeds received from the 8.00% Notes among the
conversion rights and features, the detachable Warrants and the remainder to the
underlying debt. The Company netted the debt discount associated with the
conversion rights and features and Warrants against the face value of the 8.00%
Notes to determine the carrying amount of the 8.00% Notes. The accretion of debt
discount will increase the carrying amount of the debt over the term of the
8.00% Notes. The Company allocated the proceeds at issuance as follows (in
thousands):
Fair
value of compound embedded derivative
|
$ | 23,542 | ||
Fair
value of Warrants
|
12,791 | |||
Debt
|
18,667 | |||
Face
Value of 8.00% Notes
|
$ | 55,000 |
Amended
and restated credit agreement
On August
16, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with
Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC, as administrative agent and swingline lender,
and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as issuing lender, which was
subsequently amended on September 29 and October 26, 2006. On December 17, 2007,
Thermo was assigned all the rights (except indemnification rights) and assumed
all the obligations of the administrative agent and the lenders under the
amended and restated credit agreement and the credit agreement was again amended
and restated. On December 18, 2008, the Company entered into a First Amendment
to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Thermo, as lender and
administrative agent, to increase the amount available to Globalstar under the
revolving credit facility from $50.0 million to $100.0 million. In May 2009,
$7.5 million outstanding under the $200 million credit agreement was converted
into 10 million shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company had drawn $66.1 million of the revolving credit facility and the
entire $100.0 million delayed draw term loan facility was
outstanding.
On June
19, 2009, Thermo exchanged all of the outstanding secured debt (including
accrued interest) owed to it by the Company under the credit agreement, which
totaled approximately $180.2 million, for one share of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred), and the credit agreement was
terminated. In December 2009, the one share of Series A Preferred was converted
into 109,424,034 shares of voting common stock and 16,750,000 shares of
non-voting common stock.
27
The
Company determined that the exchange of debt for Series A Preferred was a
capital transaction and did not record any gain as a result of this
exchange.
The
delayed draw term loan facility bore an annual commitment fee of 2.0% until
drawn or terminated. Commitment fees related to the loans, incurred during 2009
and 2008 were not material. To hedge a portion of the interest rate risk with
respect to the delayed draw term loan, the Company entered into a five-year
interest rate swap agreement. The Company terminated this interest rate swap
agreement on December 10, 2008 (see Note 13 “Derivatives”).
5.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
The
Company issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Notes pursuant
to a Base Indenture and a Supplemental Indenture each dated as of April 15,
2008.
The
Company placed approximately $25.5 million of the proceeds of the offering of
the 5.75% Notes in an escrow account that is being used to make the first six
scheduled semi-annual interest payments on the 5.75% Notes. The Company pledged
its interest in this escrow account to the Trustee as security for these
interest payments. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the balance in the escrow
account was $6.2 million and $14.4 million, respectively.
Except
for the pledge of the escrow account, the 5.75% Notes are senior unsecured debt
obligations of the Company. The 5.75% Notes mature on April 1, 2028 and bear
interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum. Interest on the 5.75% Notes is payable
semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
Subject
to certain exceptions set forth in the Indenture, the 5.75% Notes are subject to
repurchase for cash at the option of the holders of all or any portion of the
5.75% Notes (i) on each of April 1, 2013, April 1, 2018 and April 1, 2023 or
(ii) upon a fundamental change, both at a purchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the 5.75% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. A
fundamental change will occur upon certain changes in the ownership of the
Company, or certain events relating to the trading of the Company’s common
stock.
Holders
may convert their 5.75% Notes into shares of common stock at their option at any
time prior to maturity, subject to the Company’s option to deliver cash in lieu
of all or a portion of the share. The 5.75% Notes are convertible at an initial
conversion rate of 166.1820 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount
of 5.75% Notes, subject to adjustment. In addition to receiving the applicable
amount of shares of common stock or cash in lieu of all or a portion of the
shares, holders of 5.75% Notes who convert them prior to April 1, 2011 will
receive the cash proceeds from the sale by the Escrow Agent of the portion of
the government securities in the escrow account that are remaining with respect
to any of the first six interest payments that have not been made on the 5.75%
Notes being converted.
Holders
who convert their 5.75% Notes in connection with certain events occurring on or
prior to April 1, 2013 constituting a “make whole fundamental change” (as
defined below) will be entitled to an increase in the conversion rate as
specified in the indenture governing the 5.75% Notes. The number of additional
shares by which the applicable base conversion rate will be increased will be
determined by reference to the applicable table below and is based on the date
on which the make whole fundamental change becomes effective (the effective
date) and the price (the stock price) paid, or deemed paid, per share of the
Company’s common stock in the make whole fundamental change, subject to
adjustment as described below. If the holders of common stock receive only cash
in a make whole fundamental change, the stock price will be the cash amount paid
per share of the Company’s common stock. Otherwise, the stock price will be the
average of the closing sale prices of the Company’s common stock for each of the
10 consecutive trading days prior to, but excluding, the relevant effective
date.
The
events that constitute a make whole fundamental change are as
follows:
•
|
Any “person” or “group” (as such
terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) is or
becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under
the Exchange Act, except that a person shall be deemed to have beneficial
ownership of all shares that such person has the right to acquire, whether
such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time),
directly or indirectly, of voting stock representing 50% of more (or if
such person is Thermo Capital Partners LLC, 70% or more) of the total
voting power of all outstanding voting stock of the
Company;
|
•
|
The Company consolidates with, or
merges with or into, another person or the Company sells, assigns,
conveys, transfers, leases or otherwise disposes of all or substantially
all of its assets to any
person;
|
•
|
The adoption of a plan of
liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
or
|
•
|
The Company’s common stock (or
other common stock into which the Notes are then convertible) is not
listed on a United States national securities exchange or approved for
quotation and trading on a national automated dealer quotation system or
established automated over-the-counter trading market in the United
States.
|
The stock
prices set forth in the first column of the Make Whole Table below will be
adjusted as of any date on which the base conversion rate of the notes is
otherwise adjusted. The adjusted stock prices will equal the stock prices
applicable immediately prior to the adjusted multiplied by a fraction, the
numerator of which is the base conversion rate immediately prior to the
adjustment giving rise to the stock price adjustment and the denominator of
which is the base conversion rate as so adjusted. The base conversion rate
adjustment amounts set forth in the table below will be adjusted in the same
manner as the base conversion rate.
28
Effective Date
Make Whole Premium (Increase in Applicable Base Conversion Rate)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock Price on
Effective Date
|
April 15, 2008
|
April 1, 2009
|
April 1, 2010
|
April 1, 2011
|
April 1, 2012
|
April 1, 2013
|
|||||||||||||
$ |
4.15
|
74.7818
|
74.7818
|
74.7818
|
74.7818
|
74.7818
|
74.7818
|
||||||||||||
$ |
5.00
|
74.7818
|
64.8342
|
51.4077
|
38.9804
|
29.2910
|
33.8180
|
||||||||||||
$ |
6.00
|
74.7818
|
63.9801
|
51.4158
|
38.2260
|
24.0003
|
0.4847
|
||||||||||||
$ |
7.00
|
63.9283
|
53.8295
|
42.6844
|
30.6779
|
17.2388
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
8.00
|
55.1934
|
46.3816
|
36.6610
|
26.0029
|
14.2808
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
10.00
|
42.8698
|
36.0342
|
28.5164
|
20.1806
|
11.0823
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
20.00
|
18.5313
|
15.7624
|
12.4774
|
8.8928
|
4.9445
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
30.00
|
10.5642
|
8.8990
|
7.1438
|
5.1356
|
2.8997
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
40.00
|
6.6227
|
5.5262
|
4.4811
|
3.2576
|
1.8772
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
50.00
|
|
4.1965
|
3.5475
|
2.8790
|
2.1317
|
1.2635
|
0.0000
|
|||||||||||
$ |
75.00
|
1.4038
|
1.1810
|
0.9358
|
0.6740
|
0.4466
|
0.0000
|
||||||||||||
$ |
100.00
|
0.4174
|
0.2992
|
0.1899
|
0.0985
|
0.0663
|
0.0000
|
The
actual stock price and effective date may not be set forth in the table above,
in which case:
•
|
If the actual stock price on the
effective date is between two stock prices in the table or the actual
effective date is between two effective dates in the table, the amount of
the base conversion rate adjustment will be determined by straight-line
interpolation between the adjustment amounts set forth for the higher and
lower stock prices and the earlier and later effective dates, as
applicable, based on a 365-day
year;
|
•
|
If the actual stock price on the
effective date exceeds $100.00 per share of the Company’s common stock
(subject to adjustment), no adjustment to the base conversion rate will be
made; and
|
•
|
If the actual stock price on the
effective date is less than $4.15 per share of the Company’s common stock
(subject to adjustment), no adjustment to the base conversion rate will be
made.
|
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the base conversion rate will not exceed 240.9638 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 5.75% Notes, subject to adjustment
in the same manner as the base conversion rate.
Except as
described above with respect to holders of 5.75% Notes who convert their 5.75%
Notes prior to April 1, 2013, there is no circumstance in which holders could
receive cash in addition to the maximum number of shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of the 5.75% Notes.
If the
Company makes at least 10 scheduled semi-annual interest payments, the 5.75%
Notes are subject to redemption at the Company’s option at any time on or after
April 1, 2013, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 5.75%
Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The
indenture governing the 5.75% Notes contains customary financial reporting
requirements and also contains restrictions on mergers and asset sales. The
indenture also provides that upon certain events of default, including without
limitation failure to pay principal or interest, failure to deliver a notice of
fundamental change, failure to convert the 5.75% Notes when required,
acceleration of other material indebtedness and failure to pay material
judgments, either the trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal
amount of the 5.75% Notes may declare the principal of the 5.75% Notes and any
accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration immediately due
and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency relating
to the Company or its significant subsidiaries, the principal amount of the
5.75% Notes and accrued interest automatically becomes due and
payable.
Conversion
of 5.75% Notes
In 2008,
$36.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Notes, or 24% of the 5.75%
Notes originally issued, were converted into common stock. The Company also
exchanged an additional $42.2 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Notes,
or 28% of the 5.75% Notes originally issued for a combination of common stock
and cash. The Company has issued approximately 23.6 million shares of its common
stock and paid a nominal amount of cash for fractional shares in connection with
the conversions and exchanges. In addition, the holders whose 5.75% Notes were
converted or exchanged received an early conversion make whole amount of
approximately $9.3 million representing the next five semi-annual interest
payments that would have become due on the converted 5.75% Notes, which was paid
from funds in an escrow account maintained for the benefit of the holders of
5.75% Notes. In the exchanges, 5.75% Note holders received additional
consideration in the form of cash payments or additional shares of the Company’s
common stock in the amount of approximately $1.1 million to induce exchanges.
After these transactions, approximately $71.8 million aggregate principal amount
of 5.75% Notes remained outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Common
Stock Offering and Share Lending Agreement
Concurrently
with the offering of the 5.75% Notes, the Company entered into a share lending
agreement (the “Share Lending Agreement”) with Merrill Lynch International (the
Borrower), pursuant to which the Company agreed to lend up to 36,144,570 shares
of common stock (the Borrowed Shares) to the Borrower, subject to certain
adjustments, for a period ending on the earliest of (i) at the Company’s option,
at any time after the entire principal amount of the 5.75% Notes ceases to be
outstanding, (ii) the written agreement of the Company and the Borrower to
terminate, (iii) the occurrence of a Borrower default, at the option of Lender,
and (iv) the occurrence of a Lender default, at the option of the Borrower.
Pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement, upon the termination of the share loan,
the Borrower must return the Borrowed Shares to the Company. Upon the conversion
of 5.75% Notes (in whole or in part), a number of Borrowed Shares proportional
to the conversion rate for such notes must be returned to the Company. At the
Company’s election, the Borrower may deliver cash equal to the market value of
the corresponding Borrowed Shares instead of returning to the Company the
Borrowed Shares otherwise required by conversions of 5.75%
Notes.
29
Pursuant
to and upon the terms of the Share Lending Agreement, the Company will issue and
lend the Borrowed Shares to the Borrower as a share loan. The Borrowing Agent
also is acting as an underwriter with respect to the Borrowed Shares, which are
being offered to the public. The Borrowed Shares included approximately 32.0
million shares of common stock initially loaned by the Company to the Borrower
on separate occasions, delivered pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement and the
Underwriting Agreement, and an additional 4.1 million shares of common stock
that, from time to time, may be borrowed from the Company by the Borrower
pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement and the Underwriting Agreement and
subsequently offered and sold at prevailing market prices at the time of sale or
negotiated prices. The Borrowed Shares are free trading shares. At December 31,
2009, approximately 17.3 million Borrowed Shares remained
outstanding.
The
Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the Borrowed Shares
pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement, and it will not reserve any proceeds
from any future sale. The Borrower has received all of the proceeds from the
sale of Borrowed Shares pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement and will receive
all of the proceeds from any future sale. At the Company’s election, the
Borrower may remit cash equal to the market value of the corresponding Borrowed
Shares instead of returning the Borrowed Shares due back to the Company as a
result of conversions by 5.75% Note holders.
The
Borrowed Shares are treated as issued and outstanding for corporate law
purposes, and accordingly, the holders of the Borrowed Shares will have all of
the rights of a holder of the Company’s outstanding shares, including the right
to vote the shares on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s
stockholders and the right to receive any dividends or other distributions that
the Company may pay or makes on its outstanding shares of common stock. However,
under the Share Lending Agreement, the Borrower has agreed:
•
|
To pay, within one business day
after the relevant payment date, to the Company an amount equal to any
cash dividends that the Company pays on the Borrowed Shares;
and
|
•
|
To pay or deliver to the Company,
upon termination of the loan of Borrowed Shares, any other distribution,
in liquidation or otherwise, that the Company makes on the Borrowed
Shares.
|
To the
extent the Borrowed Shares the Company initially lent under the share lending
agreement and offered in the common stock offering have not been sold or
returned to it, the Borrower has agreed that it will not vote any such Borrowed
Shares. The Borrower has also agreed under the Share Lending Agreement that it
will not transfer or dispose of any Borrowed Shares, other than to its
affiliates, unless the transfer or disposition is pursuant to a registration
statement that is effective under the Securities Act. However, investors that
purchase the shares from the Borrower (and any subsequent transferees of such
purchasers) will be entitled to the same voting rights with respect to those
shares as any other holder of the Company’s common stock.
On
December 18, 2008, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Share Lending
Agreement with the Borrower and the Borrowing Agent. Pursuant to Amendment No.1,
the Company has the option to request the Borrower to deliver cash instead of
returning Borrowed Shares upon any termination of loans at the Borrower’s
option, at the termination date of the Share Lending Agreement or when the
outstanding loaned shares exceed the maximum number of shares permitted under
the Share Lending Agreement. The consent of the Borrower is required for any
cash settlement, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, subject to the
Borrower’s determination of applicable legal, regulatory or self-regulatory
requirements or other internal policies. Any loans settled in shares of Company
common stock will be subject to a return fee based on the stock price as agreed
by the Company and the Borrower. The return fee will not be less than $0.005 per
share or exceed $0.05 per share.
The
Company evaluated the various embedded derivatives within the Indenture for
bifurcation from the 5.75% Notes. Based upon its detailed assessment, the
Company concluded that these embedded derivatives were either (i) excluded from
bifurcation as a result of being clearly and closely related to the 5.75% Notes
or are indexed to the Company’s common stock and would be classified in
stockholders’ equity if freestanding or (ii) the fair value of the embedded
derivatives was estimated to be immaterial.
In May
2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding accounting for convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash
settlement). The guidance requires the liability and equity components of
convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion
(including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner
that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. As such, the
initial debt proceeds from the sale of the Company’s 5.75% Notes are required to
be allocated between a liability component and an equity component as of the
debt issuance date. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the
instrument’s expected life as additional non-cash interest expense.
Upon
adoption of the accounting guidance the Company recorded a decrease in long-term
debt of approximately $23.1 million; an increase in its stockholders’ equity of
approximately $28.3 million; and an increase in its net property, plant and
equipment of approximately $5.9 million as of December 31, 2008. This adoption
changed the Company’s full year 2008 Consolidated Statement of Operations,
because the gains associated with conversions and exchanges of 5.75% Notes in
2008 were recorded in stockholders’ equity prior to adoption of this standard.
This adoption impacted the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for
2008 by reducing the net loss by approximately $52.9 million. At December 31,
2009 and 2008, the remaining term for amortization associated with debt discount
was approximately 39 and 51 months, respectively. The annual effective interest
rate utilized for the amortization of debt discount during 2009 and 2008 was
9.14%. The interest cost associated with the coupon rate on the 5.75% Notes plus
the corresponding debt discount amortized during 2009 and 2008, was $8.8 million
and $11.7 million, respectively, all of which was capitalized. The carrying
amount of the equity and liability component, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
is presented below (in thousands)
30
December 31,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Equity
|
$
|
54,675
|
$
|
54,675
|
||||
Liability:
|
|
|
||||||
Principal
|
71,804
|
71,804
|
||||||
Unamortized
debt discount
|
(18,445
|
)
|
(23,134
|
)
|
||||
Net
carrying amount of liability
|
$
|
53,359
|
$
|
48,670
|
Vendor
Financing
In July
2008 the Company amended the agreement with the Launch Provider for the launch
of the Company’s second-generation satellites and certain pre and post-launch
services. Under the amended terms, the Company could defer payment on up to 75%
of certain amounts due to the Launch Provider. The deferred payments incurred
annual interest at 8.5% to 12%. In June 2009, the Company and the Launch
Provider again amended their agreement modifying the agreement in certain
respects including cancelling the deferred payment provisions. The Company paid
all deferred amounts to the vendor in July 2009.
In
September 2008 the Company amended its agreement with Hughes for the
construction of its RAN ground network equipment and software upgrades for
installation at a number of the Company’s satellite gateway ground stations and
satellite interface chips to be a part of the UTS in various next-generation
Globalstar devices. Under the amended terms, the Company deferred certain
payments due under the contract in 2008 and 2009 to December 2009. The deferred
payments incurred annual interest at 10%. In June 2009, the Company and Hughes
further amended their agreement modifying the agreement in certain respects
including cancelling the deferred payment provisions. The Company paid all
deferred amounts to the vendor in July 2009.
16.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Company measures the financial assets and liabilities listed below on a
recurring basis and reports on a fair value basis. The Company classifies its
fair value measurements in one of the following three categories:
Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted
prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability;
The
Company uses observable pricing inputs including benchmark yields, reported
trades, and broker/dealer quotes. The financial assets in Level 2 include the
interest rate cap derivative instrument.
Level 3: Prices
or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market
activity).
The
derivative liabilities in Level 3 include the compound embedded conversion
option in the 8.00% Notes and warrants issued with the 8.00% Notes and
contingent equity agreement. The Company marks-to-market these liabilities at
each reporting date with the changes in fair value recognized in the Company’s
results of operations. The Company utilizes valuation models that rely
exclusively on Level 3 inputs including, among other things: (i) the underlying
features of each item, including reset features, make whole premiums, etc. (see
Note 15); (ii) stock price volatility ranges from 34% – 117%; (iii)
risk-free interest rates ranges from 0.47% – 3.85%; (iv) dividend
yield of 0%; (v) conversion prices of $1.78; and (vi) market price at the
valuation date of $0.87.
The
Company had no financial instruments measured on a recurring basis at December
31, 2008. The following table presents the financial instruments that are
carried at fair value as of December 31, 2009:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 using
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
December
31,
2008
|
Quoted Prices
in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
Balance
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
rate cap derivative
|
$ | N/A | $ | — | $ | 6,801 | $ | — | $ | 6,801 | ||||||||||
Total
other assets measured at fair value
|
N/A | — | $ | 6,801 | — | 6,801 | ||||||||||||||
Other
non-current liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Compound
embedded conversion option
|
N/A | — | — | (14,235 | ) | (14,235 | ) | |||||||||||||
Warrants
issued with 8.00% Notes
|
N/A | — | — | (27,711 | ) | (27,711 | ) | |||||||||||||
Warrants
issued with contingent equity agreements
|
N/A | — | — | (7,809 | ) | (7,809 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total
non-current liabilities measured at fair value
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (49,755 | ) | $ | (49,755 | ) |
31
The
following tables present a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest
components, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for 2009 as follows
(in thousands):
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
—
|
||
Issuance
of compound embedded conversion option and warrant
liabilities
|
(42,333
|
)
|
||
Derivative
adjustment related to conversions
|
2,539
|
|||
Unrealized
loss, included in derivative loss, net on the income
statement
|
(9,961
|
)
|
||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
(49,755
|
)
|
17.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2009
|
June 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 15,163 | $ | 15,716 | $ | 17,521 | $ | 15,879 | ||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (21,758 | ) | $ | (13,762 | ) | $ | (5,519 | ) | $ | (33,884 | ) | ||||
Basic
loss per common share
|
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | ||||
Diluted
loss per common share
|
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | ||||
Shares
used in basic per share calculations
|
111,308 | 116,580 | 127.527 | 155,151 | ||||||||||||
Shares
used in diluted per share calculations
|
111,308 | 116,580 | 127,527 | 155,151 |
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
June 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2008
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 22,134 | $ | 22,999 | $ | 22,525 | $ | 18,397 | ||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (6,635 | ) | $ | (7,177 | ) | $ | (26,019 | ) | $ | 17,039 | |||||
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.20 | |||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.20 | |||||
Shares
used in basic per share calculations
|
82,448 | 84,029 | 84,631 | 86,422 | ||||||||||||
Shares
used in diluted per share calculations
|
82,448 | 84,029 | 84,631 | 86,422 |
18.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
January 19, 2010, Thermo Funding Company LLC (Thermo) and the Company agreed to
covert its short-term debt of $2,259,531 (plus accrued interest) into 2,525,750
shares of nonvoting common stock.
After
this transaction, Thermo owned approximately 69.8% of the Company’s outstanding
equity and 67.7% of its voting power. Additionally, Thermo owns Warrants and
8.00% Notes that may be converted into or exercised for additional shares of
common stock.
32
19.
RETROSPECTIVE ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE NO. 2009-15
Accounting
for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt
Issuance
Effective
January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the FASB’s updated guidance on accounting
for share loan facilities. This guidance requires that share-lending
arrangements be measured at fair value at the date of issuance and recognized as
debt issuance cost with an offset to paid-in-capital. The issuance cost is
required to be amortized as interest expense over the life of the financing
arrangement. Per Company policy, this amortized debt issuance cost was
capitalized as construction in process related to its second generation
satellite constellation and, therefore, included in property and equipment, net
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The standard also requires additional
disclosures including a description of the terms of the arrangement and the
reason for entering into the arrangement. As described more fully in Note 15,
the Company was obligated to lend up to 36.1 million shares of its common stock
in conjunction with its 2008 $150.0 million convertible debt issuance that is
subject to the provisions of this updated guidance.
The
Company has retrospectively revised the Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 to reflect the
adoption of this updated guidance. In addition, the Company revised Notes 2, 4,
8, 9, 15, 16 and 17 to reflect the retrospective adoption.
The
following table illustrates the impact of this adoption on the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
As Originally
Reported
|
Effect
of Change
|
As Revised
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic
|
145,430
|
(17,300
|
)
|
128,130
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding – diluted
|
145,430
|
(17,300
|
)
|
128,130
|
||||||||
Basic
loss per share
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
loss per share
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.58
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
As Originally
Reported
|
Effect
of Change
|
As Revised
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
$
|
961,768
|
$
|
3,153
|
$
|
964,921
|
||||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
$
|
64,156
|
$
|
5,491
|
$
|
69,647
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
$
|
684,539
|
$
|
16,275
|
$
|
700,814
|
||||||
Retained
deficit
|
$
|
(95,702
|
)
|
$
|
(7,631
|
)
|
$
|
(103,333
|
)
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
As Originally
Reported
|
Effect
of Change
|
As Revised
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on extinguishment of debt
|
$
|
49,042
|
$
|
7,631
|
$
|
41,411
|
||||||
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
15,161
|
$
|
7,631
|
$
|
22,792
|
||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic
|
86,405
|
(927
|
)
|
85,478
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding – diluted
|
86,405
|
(927
|
)
|
85,478
|
||||||||
Basic
loss per share
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
loss per share
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
33
As of December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
As Originally
Reported
|
Effect
of Change
|
As Revised
|
||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
$
|
642,264
|
$
|
1,767
|
$
|
644,031
|
||||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
$
|
1,425
|
$
|
6,877
|
$
|
8,302
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
$
|
463,822
|
$
|
16,275
|
$
|
480,097
|
||||||
Retained
deficit
|
$
|
(20,779
|
)
|
$
|
(7,631
|
)
|
$
|
(28,410
|
)
|
Upon
adoption of the FASB’s updated guidance on accounting for own-share lending
arrangements, the share loan agreement was valued at $16.3 million and was
classified as deferred financing costs to be amortized utilizing the effective
interest rate method over a period of five years. The fair value of the share
loan was estimated using significant unobservable inputs as the difference
between the fair value of the shares loaned to the Borrower and the present
value of the shares to be returned and other consideration provided to the
Company, pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement. A Black-Scholes Option Pricing
model was used to estimate the value of the note holders’ right to convert the
5.75% Notes into shares of common stock under certain scenarios. A risk neutral
binomial model was also used to simulate possible stock price outcomes and the
probabilities thereof.
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, in accordance with the conversion of a portion of the
5.75% Notes as described in Note 15, $7.6 million of the unamortized deferred
financing costs were written off reducing the gain from extinguishment of debt
in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for that period. For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $1.4 million and $1.8 million of
deferred financing costs were amortized and included in capitalized interest. At
December 31, 2009, $5.5 million of the deferred financing costs remained
unamortized and approximately 17.3 million Borrowed Shares valued at
approximately $15.1 million remained outstanding.
If on the
date on which the Borrower is required to return Borrowed Shares, the purchase
of common stock by the Borrower in an amount equal to all or any portion of the
number of the Borrowed Shares to be delivered to the Company shall (i) be
prohibited by any law, rules or regulation of any governmental authority to
which it is or would be subject, (ii) violate, or would upon such purchase
likely violate, any order or prohibition of any court, tribunal or other
governmental authority, (iii) require the prior consent of any court, tribunal
or governmental authority prior to any such repurchase or (iv) subject the
Borrower, in the commercially reasonable judgment of Borrower, to any liability
or potential liability under any applicable federal securities laws (other than
share transfers pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement and Section 16(b) of the
Exchange Act or illiquidity in the market for Common Stock, each of (i), (ii),
(iii) and (iv), a “Legal Obstacle”), then, in each case, the Borrower shall
immediately notify the Company of the Legal Obstacle and the basis therefore,
whereupon the Borrower’s obligation to deliver Loaned Shares to the Company
shall be suspended until such time as no Legal Obstacle with respect to such
obligations shall exist (a “Repayment Suspension”). Following the occurrence of
and during the continuation of any Repayment Suspension, the Borrower shall use
its reasonable best efforts to remove or cure the Legal Obstacle as soon as
practicable; provided
that, the Company shall promptly reimburse all costs and expenses (including
legal counsel to the Borrower) incurred or, at the Borrower’s election, provide
reasonably adequate surety or guarantee for any such costs and expenses that may
be incurred by the Borrower, in each case in removing or curing such Legal
Obstacle. If the Borrower is unable to remove or cure the Legal Obstacle within
a reasonable period of time under the circumstances, the Borrower shall pay the
Company, in lieu of the delivery of Borrowed Shares otherwise required to be
delivered, an amount in immediately available funds equal to the product of the
Closing Price as of the Business Day immediately preceding the date the Borrower
makes such payment and the number of Borrowed Shares otherwise required to be
delivered.
34