Attached files

file filename
8-K - THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC 8K 5-17-2010 - SPIRE MISSOURI INCform8k.htm
AGA Financial Forum
May 17, 2010
 
 

 
AGA Financial Forum
May 17, 2010
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by
words such as, but not limited to, “estimates,” expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” and similar
expressions. Although our forward-looking statements are based on our reasonable
assumptions, future performance or results may be different than those currently anticipated.
Our forward-looking statements in this presentation speak only as of today, and we assume no
duty to update them. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied are discussed in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the “Risk Factors” section as well as
under the “Forward-Looking Statements” heading.
 
 

 
3
www.thelacledegroup.com
* Excluding the 2008 sale of our locating and marking subsidiary
§ Proud 153-year tradition
§ Public utility holding company
 formed 2001
§ Consistent earnings performance
 (including seven consecutive
 years of record earnings*)
§ Strong balance sheet and credit
 rating
§ Rewarding shareholders with a
 continuous and growing dividend
§ Listed on the NYSE (LG) for over
 120 years
§ S&P Small Cap 600 Company
 
 

 
4
§ Pipeline provides
 transport of various
 petroleum products,
 including LDC
 peaking needs
§ Potential growth
 platform for related
 investments
§ Core natural gas utility
§ Stable, primarily
 residential customer
 base
§ Investing to improve
 customer service and
 operating efficiency
§ Established mix of
 wholesale and retail
 customers
§ Leverages expertise in
 the natural gas market
§ Opportunities to
 expand
Laclede Group at a Glance
 
 

 
5
Strategic Objectives
§ Build on success of the core regulated utility business
§ Leverage LER’s competencies and strengths
§ Pursue logical growth opportunities
§ Enhance our financial strength
 
 

 
 
 

 
7
Our System and Strengths
§ Largest LDC in Missouri
  630,000 Customers
  Over 16,000 miles of pipe
  2009 Revenues of $1.1 billion; net
 income
of $33 million
§ Diversified gas supply
  30 suppliers, with limited exposure to
 Gulf supply issues
  Transportation on 7 interstate pipelines
  Ready access to conventional and
 shale supplies
§ Significant operating storage capacity
  Market area: ~4 Bcf natural gas, ~3
 Bcfe liquid propane
  Upstream contracted storage: 23 Bcf
 
 

 
8
Diversified Conventional Gas Supply
Peak day
Flowing gas capacity
1.1 Bcf
0.7 Bcf
Top 5 gas suppliers:
 § ONEOK Energy
 § Southwestern
 Energy
 § ConocoPhillips
 § Virginia Power
 (Dominion)
 § CenterPoint Energy
 
 

 
9
Henry Hub
Barnett
Fayetteville
Woodford
Marcellus
Eagleford
Active supply centers
Shale supplies
Supply Shift
§ Impact of new shale supplies
  More prevalent gas-on-gas competition
  Increased pipeline construction, with supplier-push pipeline projects targeting eastern markets
 
 

 
10
Customer Base
§ Stable customer base
§ Diverse commercial and industrial market with minimal by-pass threat
Therms sold and transported exclude fiscal 2009 off-system sales.
 
 

 
11
Regulatory Strategy
§ Consistent recovery of operating costs and reasonable returns
§ Long-standing focus on customer service, safety and reliability
§ Stability of rates
  Largely de-coupled rate design
  Mitigates exposure to weather and customer conservation
  Shifts recovery from total usage to customer charge and first block usage
  Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS)
  Allows for timely recovery of facility-related costs (depreciation, property taxes and rate of
 return) between rate cases
  Currently recovering $10.9 million annually
  Long-established Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) clause to ensure recovery of
 gas costs
  Prudent hedging programs to reduce gas cost volatility
§ Advocacy
  Missouri Energy Development Association
  Missouri Utility Shareholders Association
 
 

 
12
Pending Rate Case
§ Company filed for a rate increase with the Missouri Public Service
 Commission in December 2009
  Requested an increase in net annual revenues of $52.6 million
  Assumed ROE of 11.1% on an as-filed rate base of $755.0 million
  Incorporated an additional $8.1 million of ISRS recovery in rates at the time
 of filing
§ Hearing scheduled for August 2010
§ Decision expected by November 2010, at the latest
 
 

 
13
Improved Branding
Supports business objectives
§ Promote energy efficiency
§ Increase burner tips
Enhances customer awareness
Makes customers aware that using natural gas
versus electricity lowers their carbon footprint
Incorporates at all customer touch points
§ Advertising
§ Newsletters
§ Websites/online presence
§ Direct marketing
§ Collateral materials
www.OriginalGreenEnergy.com
 
 

 
14
Key Accomplishments:
 
§ Improved Customer Care
   New call system
   Reorganized reporting structure
§ Shortened Read-to-Bill Cycle
   Improves cash flow
   Reduces borrowing costs
§ Strategic Sourcing Initiative
   Better pricing, performance from vendors
§ E-bill Promotion
   Increased daily number of customer sign-ups since last summer
§ GPS Technology
   Quicker response times, improved work flow
Continuous Improvement
 
 

 
 
 

 
16
Laclede Energy Resources
§ Business profile
  Non-regulated natural gas marketer
  Serving large end-users since 1996
  Growing wholesale business since 2002
  Provide customers flexible pricing alternatives
  Operating primarily in the central United States
  Transactions predominantly settled with the physical delivery of
 gas
  Anchored by capacity on 13 interstate pipelines
  Experienced management team
§ 2009 operating results
  Revenues of $837 million
  Net income of $31 million
 
 

 
17
Target Markets
§ Long-term relationships with high-quality, credit-worthy
 customers
§ Major customer groups
  Utilities, municipalities and power generators
  Marketing affiliates of utilities and producers
  Diverse group of large Midwestern end-users
  Small independent producers with varying needs
§ Capture incremental opportunities using combination of
 firm and interruptible pipeline services
 
 

 
18
Henry Hub
Barnett
Fayetteville
Woodford
Marcellus
Market dynamics are shifting dramatically due to new supply sources
that are abundant and economical to produce
Eagleford
Active supply centers
Shale supplies
Shifting Supply
 
 

 
19
Supply Portfolio
§ Diverse supplier base
  70 different suppliers used (fiscal YTD 2010)
  100% onshore production
§ Top 5 Suppliers (by volume)
  Shell Energy North America
  ConocoPhillips
  Newfield Exploration (shale)
  Chesapeake Energy (shale)
  PetroQuest Energy (shale)
 
 

 
20
LER Risk Management
§ Conservative approach with strong oversight
§ Formal price and business risk management policy with
 daily monitoring
§ Credit and liquidity exposure
  Strategy incorporates master netting arrangements, letters of
 credit and pre-payments to manage customer credit exposure
 and liquidity requirements
  Exposures and counterparty limits reviewed daily
  Focuses on margin quality, not volume quantity, to manage both
 credit exposure and liquidity risk
 
 

 
21
Six months ended
March 31
LER Volume Growth
 
 

 
22
Volume Growth
§ Volume growth driven by
  Expansion of overall portfolio
  Additional long-term transportation capacity and gas supplies
  Increased number of counterparties
  Growth in sales base
  New retail / wholesale customers
  Producer services
  Customer asset management
§ Resulting FY 2009 sales volumes increased 49% over
 FY 2008
§ FY 2010 volumes were essentially flat through first six
 months
 
 

 
23
* See Appendix for further discussion of non-GAAP measures
Good Core Earnings
§ Record FY 2009 net income
  Captured significant locational basis differential
  Leveraged favorable long-term firm transportation contracts
  FY 2009 net income was 63% above FY 2008
 
§ FY 2010 earnings are under downward pressure
  Smaller regional price differentials and reduced price volatility
  Partially offset by
  Increased seasonal basis differential opportunities through
 additional park and loan transactions
  Continued operating cost control
  Resulting net economic earnings* of $8.4 million for the first six
 months of FY 2010
 
 

 
24
Henry Hub
TCO
Existing Markets
Current Expansion Focus
LER continues to execute on a measured expansion approach,
reflecting current market conditions
Measured Expansion
 
 

 
 
 

 
Opportunities
 
 

 
27
Rational, disciplined approach
Current Focus
§ Better utilization of existing peak-shaving assets
§ Investments in other distribution properties and
 complementary upstream market opportunities
§ Leveraging Laclede Pipeline
§ Managing a strategic balance of regulated and non-
 regulated businesses
 
 

 
Financial Overview
 
 

 
29
Financial Profile
§ Solid core operating earnings
§ Strong balance sheet and free cash flow
§ Top-tier credit rating
§ Sustainable dividend provides additional yield
 
 

 
30
§ Net economic earnings reflects earnings on actual settled transactions
  Excludes earnings volatility and timing differences associated with fair value accounting (as
 required by GAAP) for transactions that have not yet been completed or settled.
§ See Appendix for further discussion of non-GAAP measures
GAAP and Net Economic Earnings
 
 

 
31
Earnings
§ FY 2009
  Record annual operating earnings (excluding the gain on sale of
 SM&P in 2008)
  Laclede Gas earnings were down slightly due to higher
 unrecovered operating costs and lower volumes
  LER’s transport position captured significant value through
 unprecedented locational basis spreads
§ First Half FY 2010
  Laclede Gas benefits from
  Sale of propane in the non-regulated market
  Discipline in controlling operating costs
  Increased ISRS recovery
  LER earnings decline due to industry-wide narrowing of margins,
 but remains solidly profitable
 
 

 
32
§ Strengthened cash flow continues to support business requirements
§ Capital spending reflects prudent investment in utility infrastructure
* See Appendix for discussion of non-GAAP measures
Cash Flow
 
 

 
33
§ Dividend paid continuously since 1946
§ Dividend Yield: 4.5%
72%
61%
63%
62%*
53%
Payout Ratio
* FY 2008 payout ratio calculation excludes the gain on disposal of SM&P and related disposal costs
Dividends
 
 

 
34
§ Strong credit ratings
§ Ample credit facilities to finance short-term needs
  Laclede Group: $ 50 million
  Laclede Gas: $320 million
§ Upcoming long-term debt maturities
  $25 million at November 2010
  $25 million at October 2012
 
 
Laclede Group
Laclede Gas
FMB
Laclede Gas
CP
Standard
& Poor’s
A
A
A-1
Moody’s
 
A2
P-2
Fitch
A-
A+
F1
Liquidity and Financial Capacity
 
 

 
35
Laclede Group - Key Takeaways
 § Solid core regulated utility business
 § Financial strength and cash flow to support current needs
 and future investments
 § Able to leverage knowledge and expertise to capitalize on
 market opportunities
 § Seeking logical expansion opportunities to deliver long-term
 growth
 
 

 
Appendix
 
 

 
37
(1) Amounts presented net of income taxes. Income taxes are calculated by applying federal, state, and local income tax rates applicable to
 ordinary income to the amounts of unrealized gain (loss) on energy-related derivative contracts. For the six months ended March 31, 2010
 and 2009, the amount of income tax expense (benefit) included in the reconciling items above are $(1.4) million and $1.4 million,
 respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the amount of income tax expense included in the reconciling item above is
 $2.2 million.
This presentation includes the non-GAAP financial measure of “net economic earnings.” As LER continues to expand its business, the
number of transactions accounted for through fair value measurements has increased. As a result, management also uses this non-
GAAP measure internally when evaluating the Company’s performance. Net economic earnings exclude from net income the after-tax
impacts of net unrealized gains and losses on energy-related derivatives resulting from the current changes in the fair value of financial
and physical transactions prior to their completion and settlement. Management believes that excluding these timing differences
provides a useful representation of the economic impact of only the actual settled transactions and their effects on results of operations.
These internal non-GAAP operating metrics should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, GAAP measures
such as net income. The schedule below provides a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable GAAP
measure:
Net Economic Earnings Reconciliation
 
 

 
38
This presentation includes the non-GAAP measures of “free cash flow” and “operating cash flow from continuing operations (excluding working capital).”
Management uses these non-GAAP measures when evaluating the Company’s performance. Operating cash flow from continuing operations (excluding working
capital) is calculated as income from continuing operations plus depreciation, amortization, and accretion expense (from continuing operations), plus certain non-
cash charges (credits) to income (which are reflected in the “Other-net” line of the Statement of Cash Flows), minus certain tax-related benefits recorded pursuant
to FIN 48 (as codified in ASC 740). Free cash flow is operating cash flow from continuing operations (excluding working capital) reduced for capital expenditures
from continuing operations and dividends paid. Management believes that these measures provide a useful representation of the cash flows from continuing
operations generated by the Company because they exclude temporary working capital and other changes, which are primarily attributable to variations in the
timing of the collections of Laclede Gas’ gas cost and the utilization of the Company’s gas inventories. Further, by reflecting cash requirements for capital
expenditures and dividends, management believes that free cash flow provides an additional useful measure of the Company’s cash flow performance. These
internal non-GAAP measures should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, GAAP measures such as net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities. The schedule above provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Cash Flow Reconciliation