Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - VRDT Corp | ex31-2.htm |
EX-32.2 - VRDT Corp | ex32-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - VRDT Corp | ex31-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - VRDT Corp | ex32-1.htm |
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the fiscal year ended March 31,
2010 Commission
file number 000-52677
WINWHEEL
BULLION, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
26-3773798
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
4695
MacArthur Court, 11th
Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number:
(202) 536-5191
Title
of each class
__________________________________________________________________
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
________________________________________________________________
|
|
None
|
None
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title
of Class
|
Common
Stock
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o
|
No
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o
|
No
x
|
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Yes o
|
No
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large Accelerated Filer
o
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
Non-accelerated
Filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o
|
No
x
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Shares Outstanding 3,400,726
|
1
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|||
PART
I.
Item 1.
|
|
Business
|
|
3
|
Item 1.A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
4
|
Item 1.B.
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
4
|
Item 2.
|
|
Properties
|
|
4
|
Item 3.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
6
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities
Holders
|
|
6
|
PART
II.
Item 5.
|
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
|
6
|
Item 6.
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
7
|
Item 7.
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation
|
|
7
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
9
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data
|
|
10
|
Item 9.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
|
23
|
Item 9A.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
23
|
Item 9B.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
24
|
PART
III.
Item 10.
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
|
|
24
|
Item 11.
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
26
|
Item 12.
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
26
|
Item 13.
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence
|
|
27
|
Item 14.
|
|
Principal Accounting Fees and
Services
|
|
27
|
PART
IV.
Item 15.
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement
Schedules
|
|
28
|
Signatures
|
29
|
|||
Exhibits
|
30
|
2
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 of the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended, that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but
rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our
industry, our beliefs and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipate”,
“expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks” and “estimates” and
variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of
which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Form 10-K.
Investors should carefully consider all of such risks before making an
investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock. The following
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements for Winwheel Bullion, Inc. Such discussion represents only the best
present assessment from our Management.
PART
I
Item
1. Business
General
Overview
The
Company formerly known as Skreem Entertainment Corp./Diversified Global
Holdings, Inc. was a development stage company that was incorporated in Nevada
on or about August 19, 1999 and was formed to promote, finance and manage
artists and projects in the music industry. The stockholders of
Skreem Entertainment Corp, on or about May 5, 2008, approved the name change
from Skreem Entertainment Corp. to Diversified Global Holdings, Inc., approved a
reverse split of ten shares of common stock for one share of common stock, and
approved the increase of authorized capital to 100,000,000 consisting of
95,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. On or
about September 4, 2008, Skreem Entertainment Corp. changed to Diversified
Global Holdings, Inc. with effective reverse split and increase of authorized
capital. On or about August 11, 2008, there was a change in control
as noted in Form 8-K dated August 19, 2008. The name of the Company
was officially changed from Diversified Global Holdings, Inc. to Winwheel
Bullion Inc. (“WWB” or the “Company”) as noted in Form 8-K dated October 20,
2008. The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “WWBU.OB” whereas prior to the name change
traded as SKNT.OB. With the change of officers and director of the
Company associated with change in control of majority shareholder as noted in
Form 8-K filings dated August 19, 2008 and September 16, 2008, incorporated as
though fully set forth herein, the director and officers, in the best interest
of the Company, have changed the business of the Company to land development.
The Company is a development stage company that was incorporated in Delaware on
August 1, 2008 and is located in the State of California. The Company has been
pursuing potential projects and funding. With the world economic issues and
status, the efforts of the Company are more challenging but will continue to
pursue in efforts to build business and bring in income generating
activities.
The
Company reports its business under the following SIC Code:
SIC
Code
|
Description
|
9532
|
Administration
of Urban Planning and Community and Rural
Development.
|
Our
corporate headquarters are located at 4695 MacArthur Court, 11th
Floor, Newport Beach, California 92660. The Company does not have a
website.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had no employees.
Available
Information
All
reports of the Company filed with the SEC are available free of charge through
the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy
materials filed by the Company at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100
F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may also obtain additional
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Patents
and Trademarks
None.
3
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The
following important factors among others, could cause our actual operating
results to differ materially from those indicated or suggested by
forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K or presented elsewhere by
management from time to time.
We
have not paid any cash dividends in the past and have no plans to issue cash
dividends in the future, which could cause the value of our common stock to have
a lower value than other similar companies which do pay cash
dividends.
We have
not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date and do not anticipate
any cash dividends being paid to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable
future. While our dividend policy will be based on the operating results and
capital needs of the business, it is anticipated that any earnings will be
retained to finance our future expansion. As we have no plans to issue cash
dividends in the future, our common stock could be less desirable to other
investors and as a result, the value of our common stock may decline, or fail to
reach the valuations of other similarly situated companies who have historically
paid cash dividends in the past.
It
is more difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares because we are not,
and may never be, eligible for NASDAQ or any national stock
exchange.
We are
not presently, nor is it likely that for the foreseeable future we will be,
eligible for inclusion in NASDAQ or for listing on any United States national
stock exchange. To be eligible to be included in NASDAQ, a company is
required to have not less than $4,000,000 in net tangible assets, a public float
with a market value of not less than $5,000,000, and a minimum bid price of
$4.00 per share. At the present time, we are unable to state when, if ever, we
will meet the NASDAQ application standards. Unless we are able to increase
our net worth and market valuation substantially, either through the
accumulation of surplus out of earned income or successful capital raising
financing activities, we will never be able to meet the eligibility requirements
of NASDAQ. As a result, it will more difficult for holders of our common
stock to resell their shares to third parties or otherwise, which could have a
material adverse effect on the liquidity and market price of our common
stock.
Sungjin
Kim owns indirectly through related parties approximately 48.6% of our
outstanding common stock, and has significant influence over our corporate
decisions, and as a result, if you invest in us, your ability to affect
corporate decisions will be limited.
Sungjin
Kim holds 1,800,000 shares of our common stock indirectly through Winwheel
Bullion Holdings, LLC (“WBHLLC”, formerly known as Winwheel Bullion, LLC),
representing approximately 48.6% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. Accordingly, Mr. Kim will have significant influence in
determining the outcome of all corporate transactions or other matters,
including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of
our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change in control even
after such conversion and exercise by other investors, as Mr. Kim will likely
continue to be our largest shareholder. The interests of Mr. Kim may differ from
the interests of the other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions
that are adverse to other shareholders. Additionally, potential investors should
take into account the fact that any vote of shares purchased will have limited
effect on the outcome of corporate decisions.
The
Company has entered into indemnification agreements with the officers and
directors and we may be required to indemnify our Directors and Officers, and if
the claim is greater than $1,000,000, it may create significant losses for the
Company.
We have
authority under Delaware and California law to indemnify our directors and
officers to the extent provided in that statute. Our Bylaws require the Company
to indemnify each of our directors and officers against liabilities imposed upon
them (including reasonable amounts paid in settlement) and expenses incurred by
them in connection with any claim made against them or any action, suit or
proceeding to which they may be a party by reason of their being or having been
a director or officer of the company. We maintain officer's and director's
liability insurance coverage with limits of liability of $1,000,000.
Consequently, if such judgment exceeds the coverage under the policy, the
Company may be forced to pay such difference. We have entered into
indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors containing
provisions that may require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers
and directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their
status or service as officers or directors (other than liabilities arising from
willful misconduct of a culpable nature) and to advance their expenses incurred
as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be
indemnified. Management believes that such indemnification provisions and
agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors
and executive officers. We are subject to claims arising from
disputes with employees, vendors and other third parties in the normal course of
business. These risks may be difficult to assess or quantify and
their existence and magnitude may remain unknown for substantial periods of
time. If the plaintiffs in any suits against us were to successfully prosecute
their claims, or if we were to settle such suits by making significant payments
to the plaintiffs, our operating results and financial condition would be
harmed. In addition, our organizational documents require us to indemnify our
senior executives to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware and California
law. If our senior executives were named in any lawsuit, our indemnification
obligations could magnify the costs of these suits.
Future
changes in financial accounting standards and other applicable regulations by
various governmental regulatory agencies may cause lower than expected operating
results and affect our reported results of operations.
Changes
in accounting standards and their application may have a significant effect on
our reported results on a going forward basis and may also affect the recording
and disclosure of previously reported transactions. New standards have occurred
and will continue to occur in the future. For example, in December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), as
amended, “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), which requires us to
expense stock options at fair value effective January 1, 2006. Under SFAS
No. 123R, the recognition of compensation expense for the fair value of
stock options reduces our reported net income and net income per share
subsequent to implementation; however, this accounting change will not have any
impact on the cash flows of our business. Under the prior rules, expensing of
the fair value of the stock options was not required and therefore, no
compensation expense for stock options was included in reported net income and
net income per share in fiscal 2006. The Company issued 100,000 shares of stock
options in fiscal 2007, recognizing $24,150 of compensation
expense. Any future issuances of stock options, in addition to the
fiscal 2006 issuances, will cause additional compensation expense to be
recognized. As of March 31, 2010, there are no outstanding stock
options.
4
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and various new rules subsequently implemented by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the NASDAQ National Market have
imposed additional reporting and corporate governance practices on public
companies.
In
addition, if we do not adequately continue to comply with the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the future, we may not be able to
accurately report our financial results or prevent error or fraud, which may
result in sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC.
Any such action could harm our business, financial results or investors’
confidence in our company, and could cause our stock price to fall.
The
nature of our businesses exposes us to the risk of litigation and liability
under environmental, health and safety and product liability laws.
Certain
aspects of our businesses involve risks of liability. In general, litigation in
our industry, including class actions that seek substantial damages, arises with
increasing frequency. Claims may be asserted under environmental, labor, health
and safety or product liability laws. Litigation is invariably expensive,
regardless of the merit of the plaintiffs’ claims. Given the general
risks, as stated, there is a chance that the Company could be named
as a defendant in the future, and there can be no assurance that regardless of
the merit of such claims, we will not be required to make substantial settlement
payments in the future.
If
the Company decides to operate internationally, there are risks which could
adversely affect operating results.
Currently,
we have no projects, projections or foreign interest involving international
operations. However, the Company may in the future, given the
opportunity, decide to pursue projects, business, or otherwise conduct
operations internationally. Doing business in foreign countries does
subject the Company to additional risks, any of which may adversely impact
future operating results, including:
•
|
international political, economic and legal
conditions;
|
•
|
our
ability to comply with foreign regulations and/or laws affecting
operations and
projects;
|
•
|
difficulties
in attracting and retaining staff and business partners to operate
internationally;
|
•
|
language
and cultural barriers;
|
•
|
seasonal
reductions in business activities and operations in the countries where
our international projects are
located;
|
•
|
integration
of foreign operations;
|
•
|
potential
adverse tax consequences;
and
|
•
|
potential
foreign currency
fluctuations.
|
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item
2. Properties
The
Company’s principal executive offices are located at 4695 MacArthur Court,
11th
Floor, Newport Beach, California. This office space is used by the Company’s
executive management team. There is no charge for the space as it is
provided by Mr. Kim as it is his personal office. The Company
believes that the current facilities are suitable for its current
needs.
5
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
None.
PART
II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
Market
for Common Equity
Market
Information
The
Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board under the
symbol “WWBU.OB.” As of March 31, 2010, the Company’s common stock
was held by approximately 187 shareholders of record, which does not include
shareholders whose shares are held in street or nominee name.
The
Company’s shares commenced trading on or about February 7, 2007. The
following chart is indicative of the fluctuations in the stock
prices:
For
the Year Ended
|
For
the Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March
31, 2010
|
March
31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
$0.51 | $0.15 | $0.30 | $0.06 | ||||||||||||
Second
Quarter
|
$0.51 | $0.20 | $1.50 | $0.04 | ||||||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
$0.60 | $0.20 | $1.50 | $0.30 | ||||||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$0.35 | $0.11 | $1.01 | $0.21 |
The
Company’s transfer agent is OTC Stock Transfer, Inc. of Salt Lake City,
Utah.
We have
not historically and do not intend to distribute dividends to stockholders in
the foreseeable future.
Securities authorized for issuance
under equity compensation plans
The
Company does not have any equity compensation plans.
Penny
Stock
Our
common stock is considered "penny stock" under the rules the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with
transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with
a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national
securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market System, provided that
current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such
securities is provided by the exchange or quotation system. The penny stock
rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to
deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission,
that:
-
|
contains a description of the nature and level of risks in
the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary
trading;
|
-
|
contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; |
-
|
contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; |
-
|
defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and |
-
|
contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation. |
The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any
transaction in a penny stock, the customer with:
6
-
|
bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; |
-
|
the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; |
-
|
the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the marker for such stock; and |
-
|
monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. |
In
addition, the penny stock rules that require that prior to a transaction in a
penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a
special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for
the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgement of the receipt
of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving
penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitably
statement.
These
disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in
the secondary market for our stock.
Related
Stockholder Matters
None.
Purchase
of Equity Securities
On May 5,
2008, the Board of Directors authorized a one for ten reverse split of its
common stock. Concurrent with the reverse split, the Board of
Directors authorized an increase in common shares from 50,000,000 to
95,000,000.
Item
6. Selected Financial Data.
As the
Company is a “smaller reporting company,” this item is
inapplicable.
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.
This
report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 of the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended, that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but
rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our
industry, our beliefs and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipate”,
“expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks” and “estimates” and
variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of
which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Form 10-K.
Investors should carefully consider all of such risks before making an
investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock. The following
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and summary of selected financial data for Winwheel Bullion, Inc.
Such discussion represents only the best present assessment from our
Management.
DESCRIPTION
OF COMPANY:
The
Company formerly known as Skreem Entertainment Corp./Diversified Global
Holdings, Inc. was a development stage company that was incorporated in Nevada
on or about August 19, 1999 and was formed to promote, finance and manage
artists and projects in the music industry. The stockholders of
Skreem Entertainment Corp, on or about May 5, 2008, approved the name change
from Skreem Entertainment Corp. to Diversified Global Holdings, Inc., approved a
reverse split of ten shares of common stock for one share of common stock, and
approved the increase of authorized capital to 100,000,000 consisting of
95,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. On or
about September 4, 2008, Skreem Entertainment Corp. changed to Diversified
Global Holdings, Inc. with effective reverse split and increase of authorized
capital. On or about August 11, 2008, there was a change in control
as noted in Form 8-K dated August 19, 2008. The name of the Company
was officially changed from Diversified Global Holdings, Inc. to Winwheel
Bullion Inc. (“WWB” or the “Company”) as noted in Form 8-K dated October 20,
2008. The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “WWBU.OB” whereas prior to the name change
traded as SKNT.OB. With the change of officers and director of the
Company associated with change in control of majority shareholder as noted in
Form 8-K filings dated August 19, 2008 and September 16, 2008, incorporated as
though fully set forth herein, the director and officers, in the best interest
of the Company, have changed the business of the Company to land development.
The Company is a development stage company that was incorporated in Delaware on
August 1, 2008 and is located in the State of California. The Company has been
pursuing potential projects and funding. With the world economic issues and
status, the efforts of the Company are more challenging but will continue to
pursue in efforts to build business and bring in income generating
activities.
The
following Management Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Form
10-K.
COMPARISON
OF THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 TO THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
7
Results of Operations
Overview
There
were no revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Total
operating expenses increased to $68,109 for the year ended March 31, 2010 from
$60,482 for the year ended March 31, 2009. This $7,627 or 12.6% increase was
primarily attributable to insurance expenses.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had cash of $38 and a deficit in working capital of
$254,834. Net loss was $73,636 for the year ended March 31, 2010. The Company
generated a negative cash flow from operations of $48,302 for the year ended
March 31, 2010. The negative cash flow from operating activities for the period
is primarily attributable to the Company's increase in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities, $22,789. The increase in financing activities is
primarily attributable to the Company’s proceeds from notes payable –
stockholder, $47,734.
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
31, 2010
|
March
31, 2009
|
March
31, 2008
|
||||||||||
Cash
used in operating activities
|
$ | (48,302 | ) | $ | (51,879 | ) | $ | (52,802 | ) | |||
Cash
used in investing activities
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Cash
provided by financing activities
|
$ | 47,734 | $ | 51,748 | $ | 53,200 | ||||||
Net
changes in cash
|
$ | (568 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | 398 |
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. The Company sustained losses of $73,636
and $6,954 for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
Company had an accumulated deficit of $8,593,074 at March 31, 2010. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as
a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company is highly
dependent on its ability to continue to obtain investment capital and loans from
an affiliate and shareholder in order to fund the current and planned operating
levels. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating
to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the
Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s
continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to bring in income
generating activities and its ability to continue receiving investment capital
and loans from an affiliate and shareholder to sustain its current level of
operations. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful
in these efforts.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates
and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues, and
expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our
estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other
assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events,
however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and assumptions.
While there are a number of significant accounting policies affecting our
financial statements; we believe the following critical accounting policies
involve the most complex, difficult and subjective estimates and
judgments:
|
·
|
Revenue
Recognition
|
|
·
|
Allowance
for uncollectible accounts
|
|
·
|
Impairment
of long-term asset
|
|
·
|
Fair
value of Stock-based compensation
|
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
the price to the customer is fixed, collectibility is reasonably assured and
title and risk of ownership is passed to the customer, which is usually upon
delivery..
8
Product
Warranty Reserves
Not applicable.
Not
applicable.
Allowance
for Uncollectible Accounts
We are
required to estimate the collectibility of our trade receivables. A considerable
amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization of these receivables
including the current creditworthiness of each customer and related aging of the
past due balances. In order to assess the collectibility of these receivables,
we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition.
Through these evaluations we may become aware of a situation where a customer
may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its
financial viability, credit ratings or bankruptcy. The reserve requirements are
based on the best facts available to us and are reevaluated and adjusted as
additional information is received. Our reserves are also based on amounts
determined by using percentages applied to certain aged receivable categories.
These percentages are determined by a variety of factors including, but are not
limited to, current economic trends, historical payment and bad debt write-off
experience. We are not able to predict changes in the financial condition of our
customers and if circumstances related to our customers deteriorate, our
estimates of the recoverability of our receivables could be materially affected
and we may be required to record additional allowances. Alternatively, if we
provided more allowances than are ultimately required, we may reverse a portion
of such provisions in future periods based on our actual collection
experience..
Impairment
of Long-Term Assets
In
accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 360-10, “Impairment or
Disposal of Long-lived Assets,” the Company reviews for Impairment of long-lived
assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
assets may not be recoverable. The Company considers the carrying value of
assets may not be recoverable based upon its review of the following events or
changes in circumstances: the asset's ability to continue to generate income
from operations and positive cash flow in future periods; loss of legal
ownership or title to the assets; significant industry or economic trends. An
impairment of $855 was recognized on long lived assets during the year ended
March 31, 2009.
Fair
Value of Stock-based Compensation
Not
applicable.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
As the
Company is a “smaller reporting company,” this item is
inapplicable.
9
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Index
|
Page
|
|
Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
11
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Balance
Sheets
|
12
|
|
Statements
of Operations
|
13
|
|
Statements
of Stockholders’ Deficiency
|
14
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
15
– 16
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
17
– 22
|
10
Board of Directors
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. as of March
31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. as of March
31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the
years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial
statements, the Company’s significant operating losses and working capital
deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are
described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
CHOI, KIM
& PARK, LLP
Los
Angeles, California
May 13,
2010
11
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
|
||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||
Balance
Sheets
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash | $ | 38 | $ | 606 | ||||
Prepaid
Expenses
|
2,982 | - | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
3,020 | 606 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 3,020 | $ | 606 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 154,498 | $ | 131,709 | ||||
Related
party payable
|
94,236 | 46,502 | ||||||
Notes
payable to affiliate
|
- | 61,000 | ||||||
Interest
payable to shareholder
|
9,120 | 3,593 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
257,854 | 242,804 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
257,854 | 242,804 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Deficiency
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 95,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized;
3,700,726 and 3,400,726 shares issued
|
||||||||
and
outstanding, respectively
|
3,701 | 3,401 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
8,334,539 | 8,273,839 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit during the development stage
|
(8,593,074 | ) | (8,519,438 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Deficiency
|
(254,834 | ) | (242,198 | ) | ||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency
|
$ | 3,020 | $ | 606 |
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
12
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
|
||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||||||
Statements
of Operations
|
||||||||||||
For
the Period
|
||||||||||||
August
19, 1999
|
||||||||||||
Years
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||||
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Sales
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 370,800 | ||||||
Cost
of sales
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
- | - | 370,800 | |||||||||
General
and administrative
|
||||||||||||
expenses
|
68,109 | 59,627 | 6,831,453 | |||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
- | 855 | 855 | |||||||||
Impairment
of loan receivable
|
- | - | 130,000 | |||||||||
Total
expenses
|
68,109 | 60,482 | 6,962,308 | |||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(68,109 | ) | (60,482 | ) | (6,591,508 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5,527 | ) | (3,361 | ) | (551,927 | ) | ||||||
Other
income
|
- | 56,889 | 56,889 | |||||||||
Loss
from conversion of
|
||||||||||||
shareholder
debt
|
- | - | (1,506,528 | ) | ||||||||
Net
Income (Loss)
|
$ | (73,636 | ) | $ | (6,954 | ) | $ | (8,593,074 | ) | |||
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
3,579,082 | 3,400,726 |
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
13
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statement
of Stockholders' Deficiency
|
For
the Period August 19, 1999 (Inception) to March 31,
2010
|
Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
During
the
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Development
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at inception, August 19, 1999
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
2,000 | 2 | 18 | - | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (84,021 | ) | (84,021 | ) | |||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 1999
|
2,000 | 2 | 18 | (84,021 | ) | (84,001 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (230,879 | ) | (230,879 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2000
|
2,000 | 2 | 18 | (314,900 | ) | (314,880 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (494,816 | ) | (494,816 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2001
|
2,000 | 2 | 18 | (809,716 | ) | (809,696 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (384,590 | ) | (384,590 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2002
|
2,000 | 2 | 18 | (1,194,306 | ) | (1,194,286 | ) | |||||||||||||
Reclassification
of debt to equity
|
4,300 | 4 | 1,581,979 | - | 1,581,983 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (736,364 | ) | (736,364 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2003
|
6,300 | 6 | 1,581,997 | (1,930,670 | ) | (348,667 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (205,994 | ) | (205,994 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2004
|
6,300 | 6 | 1,581,997 | (2,136,664 | ) | (554,661 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,592,469 | ) | (1,592,469 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2005
|
6,300 | 6 | 1,581,997 | (3,729,133 | ) | (2,147,130 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,376,529 | ) | (1,376,529 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2006
|
6,300 | 6 | 1,581,997 | (5,105,662 | ) | (3,523,659 | ) | |||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
88,285 | 88 | 123,511 | - | 123,599 | |||||||||||||||
Expenses
paid by related party
|
- | - | 515,000 | - | 515,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
issued as dividend
|
2,636,564 | 2,637 | (2,637 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Conversion
of SKRM Interactive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
payable
to equity
|
- | - | 4,382,718 | - | 4,382,718 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,810,502 | ) | (1,810,502 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2007
|
2,731,149 | 2,731 | 6,600,589 | (6,916,164 | ) | (312,844 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock
issued for debt
|
669,577 | 670 | 1,673,250 | 1,673,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,596,320 | ) | (1,596,320 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
3,400,726 | 3,401 | 8,273,839 | (8,512,484 | ) | (235,244 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (6,954 | ) | (6,954 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
3,400,726 | 3,401 | 8,273,839 | (8,519,438 | ) | (242,198 | ) | |||||||||||||
Conversion
of Martin debt
|
300,000 | 300 | 60,700 | 61,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(73,636 | ) | (73,636 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
3,700,726 | $ | 3,701 | $ | 8,334,539 | $ | (8,593,074 | ) | $ | (254,834 | ) | |||||||||
See
accompanying independent auditors report and notes to financial
statements.
|
14
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
|
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
For
the Period
|
||||||||||||
August
19, 1999
|
||||||||||||
Years
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (73,636 | ) | $ | (6,954 | ) | $ | (8,593,074 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
||||||||||||
cash
used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
- | 338 | 52,789 | |||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
- | 855 | 855 | |||||||||
Impairment
of loan receivable
|
- | - | 130,000 | |||||||||
Accrued
interest payable converted to equity
|
- | - | 209,817 | |||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
- | - | 123,599 | |||||||||
Loss
from conversion of stockholder debt to common stock
|
- | - | 1,506,528 | |||||||||
Expenses
paid by stockholder and affiliate
|
- | - | 636,796 | |||||||||
Payables
and services converted to common stock
|
- | - | 770,674 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
- | 4,734 | - | |||||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(2,982 | ) | - | (2,982 | ) | |||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
22,789 | (36,497 | ) | 163,752 | ||||||||
Interest
payable to stockholder
|
5,527 | 2,660 | 344,877 | |||||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
- | (17,015 | ) | - | ||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(48,302 | ) | (51,879 | ) | (4,656,370 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
- | - | (53,644 | ) | ||||||||
Loan
receivable
|
- | - | (130,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
- | - | (183,644 | ) | ||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from parent company
|
- | 37,248 | 697,193 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable - other
|
- | - | 385,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable - stockholder
|
47,734 | - | 1,863,384 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable - affiliates
|
- | 18,500 | 2,564,191 | |||||||||
Payments
on notes payable - other
|
- | - | (338,018 | ) | ||||||||
Payments
on notes payable - stockholder
|
- | (4,000 | ) | (190,699 | ) | |||||||
Payments
on notes payable - affiliates
|
- | - | (141,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
47,734 | 51,748 | 4,840,051 |
15
Winwheel
Bullion, Inc.
|
||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||||||
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
For
the Period
|
||||||||||||
August
19, 1999
|
||||||||||||
Years
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
(568 | ) | (131 | ) | 38 | |||||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
606 | 737 | - | |||||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | 38 | $ | 606 | $ | 38 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Taxes
paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock issued pursuant to conversion of note
|
||||||||||||
payable
|
$ | 61,000 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
See
accompanying notes to financial
statements.
|
16
WINWHEEL
BULLION, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2010 and 2009
NOTE
1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
and Operation
The
Company formerly known as Skreem Entertainment Corp./Diversified Global
Holdings, Inc. was a development stage company that was incorporated in Nevada
on or about August 19, 1999 and was formed to promote, finance and manage
artists and projects in the music industry. The stockholders of
Skreem Entertainment Corp, on or about May 5, 2008, approved the name change
from Skreem Entertainment Corp. to Diversified Global Holdings, Inc., approved a
reverse split of ten shares of common stock for one share of common stock, and
approved the increase of authorized capital to 100,000,000 consisting of
95,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. On or
about September 4, 2008, Skreem Entertainment Corp. changed to Diversified
Global Holdings, Inc. with effective reverse split and increase of authorized
capital. On or about August 11, 2008, there was a change in control
as noted in Form 8-K dated August 19, 2008. The name of the Company
was officially changed from Diversified Global Holdings, Inc. to Winwheel
Bullion Inc. (“WWB” or the “Company”) as noted in Form 8-K dated October 20,
2008. The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “WWBU.OB” whereas prior to the name change
traded as SKNT.OB. With the change of officers and director of the
Company associated with change in control of majority shareholder as noted in
Form 8-K filings dated August 19, 2008 and September 16, 2008, incorporated as
though fully set forth herein, the director and officers, in the best interest
of the Company, have changed the business of the Company to land development.
The Company is a development stage company that was incorporated in Delaware on
August 1, 2008 and is located in the State of California. The Company has been
pursuing potential projects and funding. With the world economic issues and
status, the efforts of the Company are more challenging but will continue to
pursue in efforts to build business and bring in income generating
activities.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance codified in ASC Topic 105, which
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) to
become the single source of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States. Rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles for SEC
registrants. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described
in ASC Topic 105. All other accounting literature not included in the
Codification is nonauthoritative. This guidance is effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of
this guidance did not have a significant impact on the determination or
reporting of the company’s financial results.
In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in
circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical
liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value
of such liability using one or more of the techniques prescribed by the
update. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In June
2009, the FASB issued guidance related to the accounting for transfers of
financial assets codified primarily in ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.”
This guidance requires entities to provide more information about transfers of
financial assets and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, with
transferred financial assets. It also requires additional disclosures about the
risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing
involvement in transferred financial assets. ASC Topic 860 eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for
de-recognition of financial assets. This Topic is effective for the company in
its interim and annual reporting periods beginning on and after January 1, 2010.
The company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASC Topic
860 will have on the reporting of its financial results.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance codified primarily in ASC Topic 855,
“Subsequent Events.” This guidance was issued in order to establish
principles and requirements for reviewing and reporting subsequent events and
requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated
and whether the date corresponds with the time at which the financial statements
were available for issue (as defined) or were issued. This guidance is
effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements. Refer to Note XX, “Subsequent Events,” for the
required disclosures in accordance with ASC Topic 855.
17
In
April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance codified primarily in ASC Topic
825, “Financial Instruments.” This guidance requires an entity to provide
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial
information and is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for
periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance
did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Refer to Note 5, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for the disclosures
required in accordance with this guidance.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which is codified primarily in
ASC Topic 715, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits.” This guidance is
related to an employer’s disclosures about the type of plan assets held in a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This guidance is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Concentration
of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit
risk consist principally of temporary cash investments and accounts
receivable.
The
Company places its temporary cash investments with financial institutions
insured by the FDIC.
Concentration
of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the
Company’s current conditions. The Company establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts when events and circumstances regarding the collectability
of its receivables warrant based upon factors such as the credit risk of
specific customers, historical trends, other information and past bad debt
history. The outstanding balances are stated net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts.
Impairment
of Long-Term Assets
In
accordance with ASC 360-10, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived assets,” the
Company reviews for Impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be
recoverable. The Company considers the carrying value of assets may not be
recoverable based upon its review of the following events or changes in
circumstances: the asset's ability to continue to generate income from
operations and positive cash flow in future periods; loss of legal ownership or
title to the assets; significant industry or economic trends.
Net
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
In
accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share,” basic net earnings (loss) per
common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the period by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed using the
weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares
outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalent
shares consist of preferred stock, convertible debentures, stock options and
warrant common stock equivalent shares which are not utilized when the effect is
anti-dilutive.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue on our products in accordance with the Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, (which
superseded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101) “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements”. Under these guidelines, revenue is recognized on sales transactions
when all of the following exist: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement did exist, delivery of product has occurred, the sales price to the
buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably
assured. We accrue a provision for estimated returns concurrent
with revenue recognition.
Segment
Information
In
accordance with the provisions of ASC 280, “Segment Reporting,” the Company is required
to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating
segments. The Company does not have any operating segments as of March 31,
2010.
NOTE
2 - RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
18
NOTE
3 - GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. The Company sustained losses of $73,636
and $6,954 for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
Company had an accumulated deficit of $8,593,074 and $8,519,438 at March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt about
the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern for a reasonable
period of time. The Company is highly dependent on its ability to continue
to obtain investment capital and loans from an affiliate and shareholder in
order to fund the current and planned operating levels. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and
classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as
a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is
dependent upon its ability to bring in income generating activities and its
ability to continue receiving investment capital and loans from an affiliate and
shareholder to sustain its current level of operations. No
assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in these
efforts.
The
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE
4 – BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
Prepaid
expenses consist of the following:
March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Prepaid
insurance
|
$ | 2,982 | $ | - | ||||
Total
prepaid expenses
|
$ | 2,982 | $ | - |
Accounts
payable consists of the following:
March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Vendors
|
$ | 154,498 | $ | 131,709 | ||||
Total
accounts payable
|
$ | 154,498 | $ | 131,709 |
NOTE
5 – NOTES PAYABLE
Martin
consultants, Inc. periodically provided loans to the Company for working capital
needs. Martin Consultants, Inc. is 100% owned by Jeffrey Martin, a previous
majority shareholder of the Company. Activity for the years ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 is as follows:
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
$ | 42,500 | ||
Issued
|
18,500 | |||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
61,000 | |||
Converted
to common stock
|
(61,000 | ) | ||
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
$ | - |
From the
time of change in control of the Company, Martin Consultants, Inc. and Jeffrey
Martin have agreed to forgo any further interest payments and the Company owes
no interest to Martin Consultants, Inc. In July 2009, the balance was
converted to 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
Since the
change in control of the Company, Winwheel Bullion Holdings, LLC (“WBHLLC”,
formerly known as Winwheel Bullion, LLC), the majority shareholder of the
Company, periodically provided loans to the Company for working capital needs.
WBHLLC is 100% owned by Sungjin Kim. Activity for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
19
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
$ | 9,254 | ||
Issued
|
37,248 | |||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
46,502 | |||
Issued
|
47,734 | |||
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
$ | 94,236 |
The notes
issued to WBHLLC are payable on demand and bears interest at the rate of 8% per
year.
Interest
expense for the notes payable was $5,527 and $3,361 for the years ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE
6 – RELATED PARTIES
WBHLLC is
owned 100% by Sungjin Kim, who was the Chief Executive Officer and Director of
the Company until his resignation on June 23, 2009. WBHLLC owns 48.6%
and 79.3% as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of the
Company. WBHLLC maintains business interests in other ventures
outside of the Company. Additionally, as discussed in Note 6 – Notes
Payable, the Company owes WBHLLC $94,236 and $46,502 as of March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The Company has accrued interest payable to
WBHLLC of $9,120 and $3,593 as of March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
NOTE
7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common
Stock
On July
28, 2009, the Company’s board of directors by unanimous written consent
authorized the conversion of the $61,000 debt to Martin Consultants, Inc. to
300,000 shares of common stock of the Company (see Note 5).
On May 5,
2008, the Company's board of directors by unanimous written consent authorized
one for ten reverse split. Accordingly, all references to numbers of
common shares and per share data in the accompanying financial statements have
been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split on a retroactive
basis. Concurrent with the reverse stock split, the board of
directors authorized an increase in common shares from 50,000,000 to
95,000,000.
On
September 5, 2007, the Company converted $167,392 of notes payable to Jeffrey D.
Martin to 669,577 shares of common stock. The common stock issued in
the conversion was valued at $0.25 per share, based on the quoted market price
and the Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $1,506,528 in
2007.
Preferred
Stock
The
Company authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $0.001 par
value. As or March 31, 2010, no shares have been issued or are
outstanding.
NOTE
8 – INCOME TAX
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of ASC 740,
“Income Taxes,” “which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
process for recording in the financial statements, uncertain tax positions taken
or expected to be taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position
on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more
likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing
authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if
it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The
Company recognizes federal and state tax liabilities or assets based on its
estimate of taxes payable to or refundable by tax authorities in the current
fiscal year. The Company also recognizes federal and state tax
liabilities or assets based on its estimate of future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A
valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that the Company
not be able to realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets.
Income
tax provision from continuing operations for the year ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 consists of the following:
20
3/31/2010
|
3/31/2009
|
|||||||
Current
income tax expense
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
State
|
- | - | ||||||
Total
|
- | - | ||||||
Deferred
income tax expense
|
- | - | ||||||
Provision
for income tax
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The
provisions for income taxes reconcile to the amount computed by applying
effective federal statutory income tax rate to income before provision for
income taxes as follows:
March
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
%
|
2009
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
provision at statutory tax rate
|
$ | (25,036 | ) | 34.00 | % | $ | (2,364 | ) | 34.00 | % | ||||||
State
tax, net of federal tax benefit
|
(6,509 | ) | 8.84 | % | (615 | ) | 8.84 | % | ||||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
31,546 | -42.84 | % | 2,979 | -42.84 | % | ||||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
$ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | - | 0.00 | % |
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the deferred tax assets at March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the
following:
3/31/2010
|
3/31/2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Federal
|
State
|
Federal
|
State
|
|||||||||||||
Net
operating loss
|
$ | 1,932,602 | $ | 312,627 | $ | 1,907,566 | $ | 308,577 | ||||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
deferred tax asset
|
1,932,602 | 312,627 | 1,907,566 | 308,577 | ||||||||||||
Less:
Valuation allowance
|
(1,932,602 | ) | (312,627 | ) | (1,907,566 | ) | (308,577 | ) | ||||||||
Net,
deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
The
significant component of the deferred tax asset (liability) at March 31, 2010
and 2009 was federal net operating loss carry-forward in the amount of
approximately $5,684,123 and $5,610,487, respectively, based on federal tax rate
of 34%. ASC 740 requires a valuation allowance to be recorded when it
is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, we established a full valuation
allowance on our net deferred tax assets based on the available evidences, both
positive and negative, to determine whether valuation allowance is
needed. Based on our losses before income taxes in the past years
before fiscal year 2010 and our estimated losses in the future three years,
management believed that it was more likely than not that most of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances for the full
amount of the net deferred tax asset were established to reduce the deferred tax
assets to zero based on the level of historical taxable income and projections
for future taxable income over the period of three years.
At March
31, 2010, the established valuation allowance for the net deferred tax asset was
increased by $29,086. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has federal
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5,660,000 for income tax
purposes after application of IRC Section 382 limitation on net operating losses
as result of the Company’s ownership change in the current
period. The Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will
begin to expire in 2010 to 2029 and 2010 to 2029, respectively.
In
assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets
is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment.
Because
of the historical earnings history of the Company, the net deferred tax assets
for 2010 and 2009 were fully offset by a 100% valuation
allowance. The valuation allowance for the remaining net deferred tax
assets was $2,245,229 as of March 31, 2010.
NOTE
9 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The
Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS)
amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
year. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year which is calculated
using the treasury stock method for stock options and assumes conversion of the
Company’s convertible notes. Common equivalent shares are excluded
from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive
effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the
average market price over the period have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and,
accordingly, are excluded from the calculation.
21
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
None.
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the
year ending March 31, 2010 covered by this Form 10-K. Based upon such
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has
concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange
Act) of the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
is still in the process of evaluating its internal controls over financial
reporting, based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this on-going evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of March 31,
2010 under the criteria set forth in the Internal Control—Integrated
Framework. The determination was made partially due to the small size
of the company and a lack of segregation of duties.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except as
set forth above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
The
Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be
met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect that
there are resource constraints and that the benefits must be considered relative
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because
of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of controls. The design of any system of controls
is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of
any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to
risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
22
Item
9B. Other Information.
On June
23, 2009, Sungjin Kim resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Director to focus
on other business activities that support the Company as third
parties.
On June
23, 2009, Inho Cho resigned as Interim Chief Financial Officer to pursue other
career options.
On June
23, 2009, the Board of Directors appointed Stephen V. Williams as Chief
Executive Officer and Director of the Company. Mr. Williams has
served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Alternative Construction
Technologies, Inc. (ACCY.OB). He is a retired Colonel from the
Georgia National Guard and a retired Senior Captain from Northwest
Airlines.
On June
23, 2009, the Board of Directors appointed Bruce Harmon as Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Director. Mr. Harmon has served as CFO,
Corporate Controller and/or Director for Alternative Construction Technologies,
Inc. (ACCY.OB), Accelerated Building Concepts Corporation (ABCC.OB), Organa
Technologies Group, Inc. (OGNT.PK), SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (SFSH.OB) and
ViroGroup, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIRO). He currently also serves as CFO and
Director of eLayaway, Inc. (TDOM.OB). Mr. Harmon has a Bachelors of
Science degree in Accounting from Missouri State University.
On June
23, 2009 the Board of Directors appointed Dr. Mervyn M. Dymally as a Director
for the Company. He is the Director of the Urban Health Institute at
Charles Drew University. Dr. Dymally is a former California
Assemblyman, State Senator, Lt. Governor and United States
Congressman. Dr. Dymally has also served as a foreign affairs
consultant in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean and currently serves as Honorary
Consul to the Republic of Benin in West Africa.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The
following table sets forth information with respect to persons who are serving
as directors and officers of the Company. Each director holds office
until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor has been
elected and qualified.
HELD
POSITION
|
||||||
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
SINCE
|
|||
Charles
Camorata
|
57 |
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
1/31/2004
(a)
|
|||
Karen
Alders
|
60 |
Chief
Financial Officer and Director
|
1/31/2004
(a)
|
|||
Sungjin
Kim
|
51 |
Chief
Executive Officer
|
9/12/2008
(b)
|
|||
Director
|
8/15/2008
(b)
|
|||||
Stephen
V. Williams
|
61 |
CEO
and Director
|
6/23/09
|
|||
Inho
Cho
|
58 |
Interim
Chief Financial Officer
|
9/12/2008
(b)
|
|||
Bruce
Harmon
|
51 |
Interim
Chief Financial Officer and Director
|
6/23/09
|
|||
Mervyn
M. Dymally
|
84 |
Director
|
6/23/09
|
|||
David
Price
|
46 |
Secretary
|
8/15/2008
|
|||
(a)
Resigned on September 12, 2008.
|
||||||
(b)
Resigned on June 23, 2009.
|
Biography of Directors and Officers
STEPHEN
V. WILLIAMS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR. Mr. Williams was
appointed as CEO of the Company in June 2009. Previously, he was the
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Alternative Construction Technologies,
Inc. (ACCY.OB) which specialized in “green” structural insulated panels (SIPs)
for commercial and residential structures, developer of homes, schools,
commercial buildings, churches, strip malls, modular buildings and other
applications. Mr. Williams is a veteran and retired as a Colonel in
the Georgia National Guard. He served as a fighter pilot (F-15 Eagle)
and also was a commercial airline pilot, senior flight instructor pilot and FAA
designated flight examiner with Northwest Airlines. He has a Bachelors degree in
Political Science from the University of Georgia.
23
BRUCE
HARMON, INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER. Mr. Harmon is the Interim CFO. He was
named Interim CFO in June 2009. Mr. Harmon was instrumental in the
public registration of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (SFSH.OB) in 2003, Alternative
Construction Technologies, Inc. (ACCY.OB) in 2006, Accelerated Building Concepts
Corporation (ABCC.OB) in 2007, and eLayaway, Inc. (TDOM.OB). He
served as CFO and Director of SHSH.OB, ACCY.OB, ABCC.OB and Organa Technologies
Group, Inc. (OGNT.PK). He currently is serving as CFO and Director of
TDOM.OB. Mr. Harmon owns Lakeport Business Services, Inc. and serves
as a corporate consultant to various companies. Mr. Harmon holds a
B.S. degree in Accounting from Missouri State University.
MERVYN M.
DYMALLY, PhD, DIRECTOR. Dr. Dymally is the Director of the new Urban
Health Institute at Charles Drew University. He is a former
California Assemblyman, State Senator, Lt. Governor and United States
Congressman. Dr. Dymally has traveled extensively to Africa, Asia and
the Caribbean as a foreign affairs consultant and he currently serves as
Honorary Consul to the Republic of Benin in West Africa. Dr. Dymally
holds a Ph.D from the United States International University at San Diego,
California (now Alliant International University), Masters Degree in Government
from California State University at Sacramento and BA in Education from Los
Angeles State Collage.
DAVID
PRICE, ESQ., SECRETARY. Mr. Price was appointed Secretary of the
Company in August 2008. He is a principal of Top Tier, LLC, a
Washington, D.C. law firm specializing in representing small public companies
with his practice focused on corporate law, securities matters, internal
investigations, white collar issues and arbitration / mediations. Mr.
Price has Bar affiliations with Maryland, United States District Court (Maryland
and District of Columbia), United States Court of Appeals, 4th
Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States. He is a member
of Corporate Lawyer’s Association, Euro-American Lawyers Group, Association of
U.S. Securities Attorneys, and the American Bar Association. Mr.
Price received his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Maryland and
his Juris Doctor from Antioch (DC) School of Law.
Our
directors are elected at the annual meeting of the shareholders, with vacancies
filled by the Board of Directors, and serve until their successors are elected
and qualified, or their earlier resignation or removal. Officers are appointed
by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors
or until their earlier resignation or removal. Any action required
can be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the corporation
which may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote,
if consent of consents in writing setting forth the action so taken, shall be
signed by the holders of the outstanding stock having not less than the minimum
number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a
meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and
shall be delivered to the corporation by delivery to its registered office, its
principle place of business, or an officer or agent of the corporation having
custody of the book in which the proceedings of meetings are
recorded.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
Delaware
Corporation Law allows for the indemnification of officers, directors, and any
corporate agents in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons under
certain circumstances for liabilities, including reimbursement for expenses,
incurred arising under the 1933 Act. The Bylaws of the Company provide that the
Company will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent
authorized or permitted by law and such right to indemnification will continue
as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Company and
will inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and Consultants;
provided, however, that, except for proceedings to enforce rights to
indemnification, the Company will not be obligated to indemnify any director or
officer in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such
person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of
Directors. The right to indemnification conferred will include the right to be
paid by the Company the expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred in
defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition.
The
Company may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of
Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses
to employees and agents of the Company similar to those conferred to directors
and officers of the Company. The rights to indemnification and to the
advancement of expenses are subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act to the
extent applicable.
Furthermore,
the Company may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and any
director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or another company against
any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Company would have the power
to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the
Delaware General Corporation Law.
None.
24
Item
11. Executive Compensation.
Our
directors do not receive any stated salary for their services as directors or
members of committees of the board of directors, but by resolution of the board,
a fixed fee may be allowed for attendance at each meeting. Directors may also
serve the company in other capacities as an officer, agent or otherwise, and may
receive compensation for their services in such other capacity. Upon their
election to the board, non-employee directors will be paid with stock options
and/or warrants of the Company.
No such fees have been paid to any
director since incorporation. Reasonable travel expenses are
reimbursed.
The
following table sets forth all the compensation earned by the person serving as
the Chief Executive Officer (Named Executive Officer) and each other executive
officer during the calendar years ended March 31, 2010 and 2008.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of our shares of voting stock as of March 31, 2010 by: (i) each person
who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock; (ii) the Chairman
and Chief
Executive Officer; (iii) the directors; and (iv) all of the executive officers
and directors as a group. For purposes of the beneficial ownership calculations
below, the Series A and C preferred stock, which is convertible into common
stock on a 1-for-1 basis, the options and warrants, are included on an as
converted basis such that the total issued, issuable and outstanding voting
stock becomes 16,415,816. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named below
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially
owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
Non-Equity
|
Non-qualified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive
|
Deferred
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
and
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Plan
|
Compensation
|
All
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Earnings
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles
Camorata, CEO
|
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
Karen
Alders, CFO
|
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
Sungjin
Kim, CEO
|
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
Inho
Cho, Interim CFO
|
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
David
Price, Secretary
|
2010
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||
Stephen
V. Williams, CEO
|
2010
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||
Bruce
Harmon, Interim CFO
|
2010
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
25
Amount and | ||||||||
Nature
of Beneficial
|
||||||||
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) (2)
|
Ownership
|
Percent
|
||||||
Charles
Camorata, CEO and Director (3) (6) (8)
|
22,500 | 0.61 | % | |||||
Karen
Alders, CFO and Director (3) (8)
|
- | 0.00 | % | |||||
Sungjin
Kim, CEO and Director (7) (9)
|
1,800,000 | 48.64 | % | |||||
Stephen
V. Williams, CEO and Director
|
- | 0.00 | % | |||||
Bruce
Harmon, Interim CFO and Director
|
- | 0.00 | % | |||||
Mervyn
M. Dymally, Director
|
- | 0.00 | % | |||||
David
Price, Secretary (5)
|
- | 0.00 | % |
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise noted, the address of each person or entity listed is c/o
Winwheel Bullion, Inc.,4695
MacArthur Court, 11th Floor, Newport Beach,
CA 92660.
|
(2)
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and
generally includes voting or investment power
with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to
options, warrants or convertible securities that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2007,
are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage
of the person holding such options, warrants or convertible securities but
are not deemed outstanding for computing
the percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote
and subject to community property laws where
applicable, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially
owned by
them.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Camorata and Ms. Alders' address is 11637 Orpington Street, Orlando, FL
32817.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Cho's address is 4840 Irvine Blvd., #113, Irvine, CA
92620.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Price's address is 1915 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20006.
|
(6)
|
Includes
shares owned by relatives of Mr.
Camorata.
|
(7)
|
Includes
shares owned by Winwheel Bullion Holdings,
LLC.
|
(8)
|
Resigned
September 12, 2008.
|
(9)
|
Resigned
June 23, 2009.
|
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
WBHLLC is
owned 100% by Sungjin Kim, who was the Chief Executive Officer and Director of
the Company until his resignation on June 23, 2009. WBHLLC owns 48.6%
of the Company. WBHLLC maintains business interests in other ventures
outside of the Company.
Item
14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Audit
Fees
The
Company has paid $21,000 and $18,000 for its quarterly financial reviews, Form
10-Q reviews, and Form 10-K reviews for 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The Company has paid $20,000 and $20,000 for its annual
financial audits for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Tax
Fees
The
Company’s taxes are prepared internally therefore no fees have been paid
associated with tax preparation.
All
Other Fees
The
Company has no other related fees.
The
Company’s Audit Committee has an Audit Committee Charter with the appropriate
policies and procedures regarding approvals. The Audit Committee has
approved of all items disclosed in this section.
The
Company’s auditors are Choi, Kim & Park, LLP, located in Los Angeles,
California.
26
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial
Statements
See Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Exhibits
See the
Exhibit Index following the signature page of this Registration Statement, which
Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
3.1 Articles
of Incorporation, as Amended*
3.2 Bylaws*
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. required by Rule
13a-14(1) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.**
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. required by Rule
13a-14(1) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.**
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C.
63.**
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C.
63.**
|
*
Previously filed with the Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2007 and is incorporated
herein by reference.
** Filed
herewith.
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
/s/ Stephen V.
Williams
|
May 14,
2010
|
|
Stephen
V. Williams, Chief Executive Officer
|
Date
|
/s/ Bruce
Harmon
|
May 14,
2010
|
|
Bruce
Harmon, Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
Date
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Stephen V.
Williams
|
May 14, 2010
|
|
Stephen
V. Williams, Director
|
Date
|
/s/ Bruce
Harmon
|
May 14, 2010
|
|
Bruce
Harmon, Director
|
Date
|
/s/ Mervyn M.
Dymally
|
May 14,
2010
|
|
Mervyn
M. Dymally, Director
|
Date
|
Supplemental
Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12
of the Act
(a)
Except to the extent that the materials enumerated in (1) and/or (2) below are
specifically incorporated into this Form by reference (in which case see Rule 12b-23(d)), every
registrant which files an annual report on this Form pursuant to Section 15(d)
of the Act shall furnish to the Commission for its information, at the time of
filing its report on this Form, four copies of the following:
(1)
Any annual report to security holders covering the registrant’s last
fiscal year; and
|
|
(2)
Every proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material
sent to more than ten of the registrant’s security holders with respect to
any annual or other meeting of security
holders.
|
(b) The
foregoing material shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the Commission or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Act, except to the
extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it in its annual report on
this Form by reference.
(c) If no
such annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders, a
statement to that effect shall be included under this caption. If such report or
proxy material is to be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing
of the annual report of this Form, the registrant shall so state under this
caption and shall furnish copies of such material to the Commission when it is
sent to security holders.
28