Attached files

file filename
EX-3.1 - EX-3.1 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv3w1.htm
EX-3.2 - EX-3.2 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv3w2.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv31w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv31w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv32w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - FIRSTMERIT CORP /OH/l39627exv32w1.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2010
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-10161
FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
OHIO   34-1339938
(State or other jurisdiction of   (IRS Employer Identification
incorporation or organization)   Number)
III CASCADE PLAZA, 7TH FLOOR, AKRON, OHIO 44308-1103
(Address of principal executive offices)
(330) 996-6300
(Telephone Number)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if smaller reporting company)    
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
     As of May 6, 2010, 91,184,700 shares, without par value, were outstanding.
 
 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EX-3.1
EX-3.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2


Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                         
(In thousands)                  
(Unaudited, except December 31, 2009, which is derived from the   March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
audited financial statements)   2010     2009     2009  
ASSETS
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 721,938     $ 161,033     $ 179,397  
Investment securities
                       
Held-to-maturity
    67,256       50,686       30,588  
Available-for-sale
    3,102,407       2,565,943       2,576,637  
Other investments
    131,376       128,209       128,007  
Loans held for sale
    16,009       16,828       22,408  
Noncovered Loans:
                       
Commercial loans
    4,389,859       4,066,522       4,344,915  
Mortgage loans
    447,575       463,416       524,909  
Installment loans
    1,382,522       1,425,373       1,533,885  
Home equity loans
    766,073       753,112       741,073  
Credit card loans
    145,029       153,525       141,597  
Leases
    59,464       61,541       64,384  
 
                 
Total noncovered loans
    7,190,522       6,923,489       7,350,763  
Less: allowance for loan losses
    (117,806 )     (115,092 )     (106,257 )
 
                 
Net noncovered loans
    7,072,716       6,808,397       7,244,506  
Covered loans (includes loss share receivable of $108 million)
    277,315              
 
                 
Net loans
    7,350,031       6,808,397       7,244,506  
Premises and equipment, net
    164,408       125,205       130,920  
Goodwill
    187,945       139,598       139,245  
Intangible assets
    5,659       1,158       1,316  
Other real estate covered by FDIC loss share
    11,415              
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
    565,004       542,845       519,152  
 
                 
Total assets
  $ 12,323,448     $ 10,539,902     $ 10,972,176  
 
                 
 
                       
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Deposits:
                       
Demand-non-interest bearing
  $ 2,217,714     $ 2,069,921       1,848,200  
Demand-interest bearing
    686,503       677,448       669,789  
Savings and money market accounts
    4,103,657       3,408,109       2,763,058  
Certificates and other time deposits
    2,362,135       1,360,318       2,397,166  
 
                 
Total deposits
    9,370,009       7,515,796       7,678,213  
 
                 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    896,330       996,345       804,525  
Wholesale borrowings
    677,715       740,105       1,134,152  
Accrued taxes, expenses, and other liabilities
    224,041       222,029       271,017  
 
                 
Total liabilities
    11,168,095       9,474,275       9,887,907  
 
                 
Commitments and contingencies
                       
Shareholders’ equity:
                       
Preferred stock, without par value: authorized and unissued 7,000,000 shares
                 
Preferred stock, Series A, without par value: designated 800,000 shares; none outstanding
                 
Convertible preferred stock, Series B, without par value: designated 220,000 shares; none outstanding
                 
Fixed-Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, $1,000 liquidation preference; authorized and issued 125,000 shares
                120,622  
Common stock, without par value: authorized 300,000,000 shares; issued 97,521,571, 93,633,871 and 92,026,350 at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively
    127,937       127,937       127,937  
Common stock warrant
                4,582  
Capital surplus
    171,330       88,573       84,876  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (20,983 )     (25,459 )     (38,634 )
Retained earnings
    1,047,827       1,043,625       1,057,681  
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,711,936, 6,629,995 and 10,609,284 shares at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively
    (170,758 )     (169,049 )     (272,795 )
 
                 
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,155,353       1,065,627       1,084,269  
 
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 12,323,448     $ 10,539,902     $ 10,972,176  
 
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
                 
    Quarters ended  
(Unaudited)   March 31,  
(In thousands except per share data)   2010     2009  
Interest income:
               
Interest and fees on loans, including held for sale
  $ 83,150     $ 87,799  
Investment securities
               
Taxable
    24,870       28,295  
Tax-exempt
    3,339       3,262  
 
           
Total investment securities interest
    28,209       31,557  
Other earning assets
    495        
 
           
Total interest income
    111,854       119,356  
 
           
Interest expense:
               
Interest on deposits:
               
Demand-interest bearing
    152       155  
Savings and money market accounts
    7,601       5,377  
Certificates and other time deposits
    6,406       18,588  
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    1,127       999  
Interest on wholesale borrowings
    6,174       7,343  
 
           
Total interest expense
    21,460       32,462  
 
           
Net interest income
    90,394       86,894  
Provision for loan losses
    25,493       18,065  
 
           
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    64,901       68,829  
 
           
Other income:
               
Trust department income
    5,281       4,790  
Service charges on deposits
    15,366       14,163  
Credit card fees
    11,558       11,084  
ATM and other service fees
    2,509       2,606  
Bank owned life insurance income
    5,652       3,015  
Investment services and insurance
    1,928       2,918  
Loan sales and servicing income
    3,237       2,335  
Gain on acquistion
    5,090        
Gain on post medical retirement curtailment
          9,543  
Other operating income
    3,328       4,734  
 
           
Total other income
    53,949       55,188  
 
           
Other expenses:
               
Salaries, wages, pension and employee benefits
    48,156       42,682  
Net occupancy expense
    7,140       6,871  
Equipment expense
    6,050       5,797  
Stationery, supplies and postage
    2,693       2,275  
Bankcard, loan processing and other costs
    7,818       7,842  
Professional services
    5,237       3,480  
Amortization of intangibles
    234       87  
FDIC expense
    3,765       2,556  
Other operating expense
    12,920       11,613  
 
           
Total other expenses
    94,013       83,203  
 
           
Income before federal income tax expense
    24,837       40,814  
Federal income tax expense
    6,816       11,380  
 
           
Net income
  $ 18,021     $ 29,434  
 
           
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
               
Unrealized securities’ holding gain, net of taxes
  $ 4,476     $ 15,817  
Unrealized hedging loss, net of taxes
          (94 )
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes
          (277 )
 
           
Total other comprehensive gain, net of taxes
    4,476       15,446  
 
           
Comprehensive income
  $ 22,497     $ 44,880  
 
           
Net income applicable to common shares
  $ 18,021     $ 27,563  
 
           
Net income used in diluted EPS calculation
  $ 18,021     $ 27,563  
 
           
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic*
    87,771       82,514  
 
           
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted*
    87,777       82,523  
 
           
Basic earnings per share *
  $ 0.21     $ 0.33  
 
           
Diluted earnings per share *
  $ 0.21     $ 0.33  
 
           
Dividend per share
  $ 0.16     $ 0.29  
 
           
 
*   Average outstanding shares and per share data as of March 31, 2009 are restated to reflect the effect of stock dividends declared April 28, 2009 and August 20, 2009.
The accompaning notes are an integral part of the consoldiated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                                                 
                                    Accumulated                        
                      Common             Other                     Total  
(Unaudited)   Preferred     Common     Stock     Capital     Comprehensive     Retained     Treasury     Shareholders’  
(In thousands)   Stock     Stock     Warrant     Surplus     Income     Earnings     Stock     Equity  
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $     $ 127,937     $     $ 94,802     $ (54,080 )   $ 1,053,435     $ (284,251 )   $ 937,843  
Net income
                                  67,692             67,692  
Cash dividends — preferred stock
                                  (1,789 )           (1,789 )
Cash dividends — common stock ($0.61 per share)
                                  (50,286 )           (50,286 )
Stock dividend
                      5,765             (21,718 )     15,953        
Options exercised (2,400 shares)
                      (18 )                 58       40  
Nonvested (restricted) shares granted (536,058 shares)
                      (13,154 )                 13,151       (3 )
Treasury shares purchased (118,736 shares)
                      500                   (2,197 )     (1,697 )
Deferred compensation trust (29,597 shares)
                      (32 )                 32        
Share-based compensation
                      6,270                         6,270  
Issuance of common stock (3,267,751 shares)
                      (24,561 )                 84,517       59,956  
Issuance of Fixed-Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
    120,622             4,582                   (204 )           125,000  
Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes
                            47,568                   47,568  
Unrealized hedging gain, net of taxes
                            (94 )                 (94 )
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes
                            (831 )                 (831 )
 
                                               
Balance at March 31, 2009
  $ 120,622     $ 127,937     $ 4,582     $ 69,572     $ (7,437 )   $ 1,047,130     $ (172,737 )   $ 1,189,669  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $     $ 127,937     $     $ 88,573     $ (25,459 )   $ 1,043,625     $ (169,049 )   $ 1,065,627  
Net income
                                  18,021             18,021  
Cash dividends — common stock ($0.16 per share)
                                  (13,819 )           (13,819 )
Options exercised (29,161 shares)
                      (185 )                 677       492  
Nonvested (restricted) shares granted (4,375 shares)
                      (99 )                 99        
Treasury shares purchased (115,477 shares)
                      523                   (2,509 )     (1,986 )
Deferred compensation trust (8,828 shares)
                      (24 )                 24        
Share-based compensation
                      2,543                         2,543  
Issuance of common stock (3,887,700 shares)
                      79,999                         79,999  
Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes
                            4,476                   4,476  
 
                                               
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $     $ 127,937     $     $ 171,330     $ (20,983 )   $ 1,047,827     $ (170,758 )   $ 1,155,353  
 
                                               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                 
    Three months ended  
(Unaudited)   March 31,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Operating Activities
               
Net income
  $ 18,021     $ 29,434  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    25,493       18,065  
Depreciation and amortization
    5,277       4,938  
Accretion
    (3,116 )     (889 )
Amortization of investment securities premiums, net
    1,971       851  
Post medical retirement curtailment gain
          (9,543 )
Gain on acquisition
    (5,090 )      
Originations of loans held for sale
    (79,771 )     (130,899 )
Proceeds from sales of loans, primarily mortgage loans sold in the secondary mortgage markets
    81,893       120,558  
Gains on sales of loans, net
    (1,303 )     (926 )
Net change in assets and liabilities
               
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable
    (1,633 )     2,589  
Increase (decrease) in interest payable
    1,415       (421 )
Increase in prepaid assets
    (719 )     (5,175 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    2,114       (9,616 )
(Decrease) increase in taxes payable
    (4,297     6,243  
Decrease (increase) in other receivables
    741       (24 )
(Increase) decrease in other assets
    (5,688 )     68  
Other increases (decreases)
    8,203       (8,394 )
             
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    43,511       16,859  
Investing Activities
               
Dispositions of investment securities:
               
Available-for-sale — sales
    12,161       16,552  
Available-for-sale — maturities
    153,567       158,998  
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities
    (714,255 )     (97,745 )
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases
    (12,299 )     55,776  
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (2,266 )     (2,619 )
Sales of premises and equipment
          32  
Net cash acquired from acquisitions
    931,060        
             
NET CASH PROVIDED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    367,968       130,994  
Financing Activities
               
Net (decrease) increase in demand accounts
    (3,671 )     213,840  
Net increase in savings and money market accounts
    232,767       250,727  
Net increase (decrease) in certificates and other time deposits
    18,049       (384,033 )
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (100,015 )     (116,865 )
Net decrease in wholesale borrowings
    (62,390 )     (210,043 )
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
          125,000  
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
    79,999        
Cash dividends — preferred
          (1,667 )
Cash dividends — common
    (13,819 )     (23,317 )
Purchase of treasury shares
    (1,986 )     (542 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, conversion of debentures or conversion of preferred stock
    492       38  
             
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    149,426       (146,862 )
             
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
    560,905       991  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    161,033       178,406  
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 721,938     $ 179,397  
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 12,908     $ 13,162  
             
Federal income taxes
  $ 797     $  
             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

FirstMerit Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands except per share data)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Basis of Presentation — FirstMerit Corporation (“the Parent Company”) is a bank holding company whose principal asset is the common stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, FirstMerit Bank, N. A. The Parent Company’s other subsidiaries include Citizens Savings Corporation of Stark County, FirstMerit Capital Trust I, FirstMerit Community Development Corporation, FirstMerit Risk Management, Inc., and FMT, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
     The accounting and reporting policies of FirstMerit Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America and to general practices within the financial services industry. Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Other than resolving certain minor inconsistencies in current GAAP, the ASC is not intended to change GAAP, but rather to make it easier to review and research GAAP applicable to a particular transaction or specific accounting issue. Technical references to GAAP included in these Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements are provided under the new ASC structure.
     The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normally recurring accruals) that are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. No material subsequent events have occurred requiring recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year or for any future period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
     Certain reclassifications of prior year’s amounts have been made to conform to current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net earnings.
     Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards — In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 which has been codified into ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (“ASC 860”). This guidance removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from existing GAAP and removes the exception from applying the accounting and reporting standards within ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”), to

6


Table of Contents

qualifying special purpose entities. This guidance also establishes conditions for accounting and reporting of a transfer of a portion of a financial asset, modifies the asset sale/de-recognition criteria, and changes how retained interests are initially measured. This guidance is expected to provide greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, with the transferred assets. This guidance was effective for the Corporation as of January 1, 2010 and it not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) which was codified in ASC 810. This guidance removes the scope exception for qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Enhanced disclosures are also required. This guidance was effective for the Corporation as of January 1, 2010 and it did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
     FASB ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820 to require additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, the ASU requires disclosure of the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers; the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3; and information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. In addition to these new disclosure requirements, the ASU also amends ASC 820 to clarify certain existing disclosure requirements. For example, the ASU clarifies that reporting entities are required to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. Previously, separate fair value disclosures were required for each major category of assets and liabilities. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies the requirement to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. Except for the requirement to disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements on a gross basis, these disclosures are effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and are incorporated into Note 10 (Fair Value Measurement). The requirement to separately disclose purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of recurring Level 3 measurements becomes effective for the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
2. Business Combinations
     Asset Based Loans
     On December 16, 2009, FirstMerit Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), acquired $102.0 million in outstanding principal of asset based lending loans (“ABL Loans”), as well as the staff to service and build new business, from First Bank Business Capital, Inc., (“FBBC”) for $93.2 million in cash. FBBC is a wholly owned subsidiary of First Bank, a Missouri state chartered bank. This acquisition expands the Corporation’s market presence and asset based lending business into the Midwest.
     The purchase was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Accordingly, the ABL Loans and a non-compete

7


Table of Contents

agreement acquired were recorded at their fair values, $92.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively, on the date of acquisition. The Bank recorded goodwill of $0.4 million relating to the ABL Loans and non-compete agreement it acquired. Additional information can be found in Note 5 (Goodwill and Intangible Assets).
     All ABL Loans acquired were performing as of the acquisition date and as of March 31, 2010. The shortfall between the fair value of the ABL Loans acquired and the outstanding principal balance of these loans at the date of acquisition was a $9.3 million discount and will be accreted into interest income over their estimated useful life in accordance with ASC 310, Receivables.
     First Bank Branches
     On February 19, 2010, the Bank completed the acquisition of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities with respect to 24 branches of First Bank located in the greater Chicago, Illinois area. This acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805. The Bank recognized $1.4 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed in the current period. These costs are included in the line item entitled professional services in the consolidated income statement. Excluding the purchase accounting adjustments, the acquisition included the assumption of approximately $1.2 billion in deposits and the purchase of $301.2 million of loans and $23.0 million in real and personal property associated with the acquired branch locations. The Bank received cash of $832.5 million to assume the net liabilities.
     The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
                         
    Acquired     Fair Value     As Recorded by  
    Book Value     Adjustments     FirstMerit Bank, N.A.  
Assets
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 3,725     $     $ 3,725  
Loans
    301,236       (25,624 )     275,612  
Premises and equipment
    22,992       18,963       41,955  
Goodwill
          48,347       48,347  
Core deposit intangible
          3,154       3,154  
Other assets
    941       3,115       4,056  
 
                 
Total assets acquired
  $ 328,894     $ 47,955     $ 376,849  
 
                 
Liabilities
                       
Deposits
  $ 1,199,279     $ 7,134     $ 1,206,413  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    4,192       (1,271 )     2,921  
 
                 
Total liabilities assumed
  $ 1,203,471     $ 5,863     $ 1,209,334  
 
                 
     All loans acquired in the First Bank acquisition were performing as of the acquisition date and as of March 31, 2010. The shortfall between the fair value and the outstanding principal balance of these loans at the date of acquisition was a $25.6 million discount and will be accreted into interest income over their estimated useful life in accordance with ASC 310, Receivables.

8


Table of Contents

     Additional information regarding the goodwill and core deposit intangible acquired in the First Bank acquisition can be found in Note 5 (Goodwill and Intangible Assets).
     Pro forma financial statement information is not presented because the historical results of the First Bank branches acquired are not meaningful or significant to the Corporation’s results.
     George Washington Savings Bank — FDIC Assisted Acquisition
     On February 19, 2010 the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of the failed George Washington Savings Bank (“George Washington”), the subsidiary of George Washington Savings Bancorp, through a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulations, Division of Banking, declared George Washington closed on February 19, 2010 and appointed the FDIC as receiver.
     The Bank did not acquire the real estate, banking facilities, furniture and equipment of George Washington as part of the purchase and assumption agreement but has the option to purchase these assets at fair market value from the FDIC. This purchase option expires 90 days after acquisition date, but was extended by the FDIC. Fair market values for the real estate, facilities, furniture and equipment will be based on current appraisals and determined at a later date. The Bank is leasing these facilities and equipment from the FDIC until current appraisals are received and a final purchase decision is made.
     The acquisitions of the net assets of George Washington constitute a business combination as defined by ASC 805 and, accordingly were recorded at their estimated fair value on the date of acquisition. The Bank recognized $0.3 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed in the current period. These costs are included in the line item entitled professional services in the consolidated income statement. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The estimated fair value of assets acquired exceeded the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed, resulting in a bargain purchase gain of $5.1 million. The Bank and the FDIC are engaged in on-going discussions that may impact which assets and liabilities are ultimately acquired or assumed by the Bank and/or the purchase price. In addition, the tax treatment of FDIC assisted acquisitions is complex and subject to interpretations that may result in future adjustments of deferred taxes as of the acquisition date.
     In connection with the George Washington acquisition, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that collectively cover $327.1 million of assets including single family residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, and other real estate (collectively referred to as “Covered Assets”). The Bank acquired other George Washington assets that are not covered by the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC including investment securities purchased at fair market value and other tangible assets.
     Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses of up to $172.0 million with respect to the Covered Assets and will reimburse the Bank for 95% of losses that exceed $172.0 million. The Bank will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid the Bank 80% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements, and for 95% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid the Bank 95% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.
     The amounts covered by the loss sharing agreements are the pre-acquisition book values of the underlying Covered Assets, the contractual balance of acquired unfunded commitments,

9


Table of Contents

and certain future net direct costs incurred in the collection and settlement process. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and the Bank reimbursement to the FDIC, in each case as described above, for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to commercial loans and securities provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and the Bank reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years, in each case as described above. The Bank will service the Covered Assets. The expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements were recorded on the balance sheet as part of the covered loans acquired at their estimated fair values of $107.6 million on the acquisition date.
     The table below presents a summary of the assets and liabilities purchased in the George Washington acquisition recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition date. The Bank received a cash payment from the FDIC of approximately $40.2 million to assume the net liabilities. The estimated fair value of assets acquired and cash payment received from the FDIC exceeded the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed, resulting in a bargain purchase gain of $5.1 million.
                         
    As Recorded     Fair Value     As Recorded by  
    by FDIC     Adjustments     FirstMerit Bank, N.A.  
Assets
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 57,984     $     $ 57,984  
Investment securities
    15,410             15,410  
Covered Loans
                       
Commercial Loan
    256,832       (119,404 )     137,428  
Mortgage Loan
    24,078       (9,952 )     14,126  
Installment Loan
    27,218       (7,339 )     19,879  
 
                 
Total covered loans
    308,128       (136,695 )     171,433  
Loss share receivable
          107,550       107,550  
 
                 
Total covered loans and loss share receivable
                    278,983  
Core deposit intangible
          962       962  
Covered other real estate
    19,021       (7,561 )     11,460  
Other assets
    3,340             3,340  
 
                 
Total assets acquired
  $ 403,883     $ (35,744 )   $ 368,139  
 
                 
 
                       
Liabilities
                       
Deposits
                       
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts
  $ 54,242     $     $ 54,242  
Savings deposits
    62,737             62,737  
Time deposits
    278,755       4,921       283,676  
 
                 
Total deposits
    395,734       4,921       400,655  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    2,569             2,569  
 
                 
Total liabilities assumed
  $ 398,303     $ 4,921     $ 403,224  
 
                 
     The operating results of the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 include the operating results produced by the George Washington acquisition for the period of February 19, 2010 to March 31, 2010. Due primarily to the Bank acquiring only certain assets and liabilities in the George Washington acquisition, the significant amount of fair value adjustments,

10


Table of Contents

the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, and on-going discussions with the FDIC that may impact which assets and liabilities are ultimately acquired or assumed by the Bank, historical results from George Washington are not meaningful or significant to the Corporation’s results, and thus no 2010 and 2009 pro forma information is presented.
     The Corporation evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisition of George Washington for impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310-30”). Purchased loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected. In the assessment of credit quality deterioration, Management made numerous assumptions, interpretations and judgments, using internal and third-party credit quality information to determine whether it is probable that the Corporation will be able to collect all contractually required payments. This is a point in time assessment and inherently subjective due to the nature of the available information and judgment involved.
     The Corporation has elected to recognize the accretion of the purchase discount for purchased nonimpaired loans, excluding those with revolving privileges, based on the acquired loan’s expected cash flows, as described in the ASC 310-30. All purchased impaired and nonimpaired loans, excluding those with revolving privileges, are included in the ASC 310-30 financial statement disclosures to these consolidated financial statements. Revolving loans are excluded from purchased impaired loans accounting.
     The outstanding balance of all purchased loans accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30 in the George Washington acquisition was $268.8 million and $267.2 million, as of February 19, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. As of the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of contractually required payments receivable, including interest, for all loans accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30 acquired in the George Washington transaction was $349.4 million. The cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date for these loans were $173.9 million, including interest. These amounts were determined based upon the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. The fair value of these loans as of the acquisition date was $150.9 million. Interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, is being recognized on all purchased impaired and nonimpaired loans accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30.
     Changes in the carrying amount of accretable yield for purchased loans accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30 were as follows for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 for George Washington.

11


Table of Contents

                 
            Carrying  
    Accretable     Amount of  
    Yield     Loans  
Balance at the date of acquisition
  $ 22,999     $ 150,870  
Accretion
    (1,044 )     1,044  
Payments, received, net
          (3,742 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 21,955     $ 148,172  
 
           
     As of the acquisition date, the estimate of contractually required payments receivable, including interest, for all loans with revolving privileges acquired in the George Washington transaction was $46.3 million. The cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition dates for all loans with revolving privileges acquired in the George Washington transaction were $24.8 million, including interest. The fair value at acquisition date of loans with revolving privileges was $20.5 million. The difference between the fair value of the purchased loans with revolving privileges and the outstanding balance is being accreted to interest income over the remaining period the revolving lines are in effect.
3. Investment Securities
     The following tables provide the amortized cost and fair value for the major categories of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, which reflects historical cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with net unrealized gains or losses reported on an after-tax basis as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

12


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available for sale
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government agency debentures
  $ 280,333     $ 50     $ (743 )   $ 279,640  
U.S. States and political subdivisions
    288,439       4,964       (417 )     292,986  
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    1,653,689       56,189       (299 )     1,709,579  
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    752,443       20,103       (228 )     772,318  
Non-agency
    20             (1 )     19  
Corporate debt securities
    61,397             (17,603 )     43,794  
Other debt securities
    667                   667  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    3,036,988       81,306       (19,291 )     3,099,003  
Marketable equity securities
    3,404                   3,404  
 
                       
Total securities available for sale
  $ 3,040,392     $ 81,306     $ (19,291 )   $ 3,102,407  
 
                       
 
                               
Securities held to maturity
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. States and political subdivisions
  $ 67,256     $     $     $ 67,256  
 
                       
Total securities held to maturity
  $ 67,256     $     $     $ 67,256  
 
                       
                                 
    December 31, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available for sale
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government agency debentures
  $ 32,029     $     $ (132 )   $ 31,897  
U.S. States and political subdivisions
    289,529       4,984       (394 )     294,119  
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    1,557,754       55,325       (1,852 )     1,611,227  
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
       
U.S. government agencies
    566,151       16,394       (238 )     582,307  
Non-agency
    22                   22  
Corporate debt securities
    61,385             (18,957 )     42,428  
Other debt securities
    679                   679  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    2,507,549       76,703       (21,573 )     2,562,679  
Marketable equity securities
    3,264                   3,264  
 
                       
Total securities available for sale
  $ 2,510,813     $ 76,703     $ (21,573 )   $ 2,565,943  
 
                       
 
                               
Securities held to maturity
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. States and political subdivisions
  $ 50,686     $     $     $ 50,686  
 
                       
Total securities held to maturity
  $ 50,686     $     $     $ 50,686  
 
                       

13


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available for sale
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. States and political subdivisions
  $ 288,470     $ 3,722     $ (2,416 )   $ 289,776  
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    1,655,231       44,634       (405 )     1,699,460  
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
       
U.S. government agencies
    522,930       15,106       (164 )     537,872  
Non-agency
    19,480             (404 )     19,076  
Corporate debt securities
    61,347             (34,561 )     26,786  
Other debt securities
    717                   717  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    2,548,175       63,462       (37,950 )     2,573,687  
Marketable equity securities
    2,950                   2,950  
 
                       
Total securities available for sale
  $ 2,551,125     $ 63,462     $ (37,950 )   $ 2,576,637  
 
                       
 
                               
Securities held to maturity
                               
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. States and political subdivisions
  $ 30,588     $     $     $ 30,588  
 
                       
Total securities held to maturity
  $ 30,588     $     $     $ 30,588  
 
                       
     Other investments on the balance sheet include Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock.
                         
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    2010     2009     2009  
FRB stock
  $ 9,064     $ 9,064     $ 8,862  
FHLB stock
    122,312       119,145       119,145  
 
                 
Total other investments
  $ 131,376     $ 128,209     $ 128,007  
 
                 
     FRB and FHLB stock is classified as a restricted investment, carried at cost and valued based on the ultimate recoverability of par value. Cash and stock dividends received on the stock are reported as interest income. There are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on these investments carried at cost.
     At March 31, 2009, securities totaling $2.0 billion were pledged to secure trust and public deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value
     The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities in the securities available-for-sale portfolio by length of time that individual securities in each category had been in a continuous loss position.

14


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    At March 31, 2010  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
                    Number of                     Number of                
            Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses  
Debt Securities
                                                               
U.S. government agency debentures
  $ 232,571     $ (743 )     15     $     $           $ 232,571     $ (743 )
U.S. States and political subdivisions
    39,342       (417 )     63                         39,342       (417 )
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    131,708       (296 )     9       238       (3 )     1       131,946       (299 )
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    164,827       (228 )     13                         164,827       (228 )
Non-agency
    4       (1 )     1                         4       (1 )
Corporate debt securities
                      43,794       (17,603 )     8       43,794       (17,603 )
 
                                               
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 568,452     $ (1,685 )     101     $ 44,032     $ (17,606 )     9     $ 612,484     $ (19,291 )
 
                                               
                                                                 
    At December 31, 2009  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
                    Number of                     Number of                
            Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses  
Debt Securities
                                                               
U.S. government agency debentures
  $ 31,897     $ (132 )     3     $     $           $ 31,897     $ (132 )
U.S. States and political subdivisions
    39,059       (394 )     65                         39,059       (394 )
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    216,014       (1,849 )     15       271       (3 )     2       216,285       (1,852 )
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    68,513       (238 )     6                         68,513       (238 )
Non-agency
    5             1                         5        
Corporate debt securities
                        42,428       (18,957 )     8       42,428       (18,957 )
 
                                               
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 355,488     $ (2,613 )     90     $ 42,699     $ (18,960 )     10     $ 398,187     $ (21,573 )
 
                                               

15


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    At March 31, 2009  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
                    Number of                     Number of                
            Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized     Imparied             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses     Securities     Fair Value     Losses  
Debt Securities
                                                               
U.S. States and political subdivisions
  $ 61,369     $ (1,430 )     104     $ 24,427     $ (986 )     39     $ 85,796     $ (2,416 )
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    63,876       (401 )     10       347       (4 )     3       64,223       (405 )
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
                                                               
U.S. government agencies
    10,679       (2 )     1       25,606       (162 )     3       36,285       (164 )
Non-agency
    19,052       (404 )     1                         19,052       (404 )
Corporate debt securities
                      26,786       (34,561 )     8       26,786       (34,561 )
 
                                               
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 154,976     $ (2,237 )     116     $ 77,166     $ (35,713 )     53     $ 232,142     $ (37,950 )
 
                                               
     At least quarterly the Corporation conducts a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities in an unrealized loss position to determine if OTTI exists. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Under the current OTTI accounting model for debt securities, which was amended by the FASB and adopted by the Corporation in the second quarter of 2009, an OTTI loss must be recognized for a debt security in an unrealized loss position if the Corporation intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. In this situation, the amount of loss recognized in income is equal to the difference between the fair value and the amortized cost basis of the security. Even if the Corporation does not expect to sell the security, the Corporation must evaluate the expected cash flows to be received to determine if a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in income. The portion of the unrealized loss relating to other factors, such as liquidity conditions in the market or changes in market interest rates, is recorded in other comprehensive income. Equity securities are also evaluated to determine whether the unrealized loss is expected to be recoverable based on whether evidence exists to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis. If it is probable that the Corporation will not recover the amortized cost basis, taking into consideration the estimated recovery period and its ability to hold the equity security until recovery, OTTI is recognized.
     The security-level assessment is performed on each security, regardless of the classification of the security as available for sale or held to maturity. The assessments are based on the nature of the securities, the financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the securities, the extent and duration of the loss and the intent and whether Management intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. For those securities for which the assessment shows the Corporation will recover the entire cost basis, Management does not intend to sell

16


Table of Contents

these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of the amortized cost basis, the gross unrealized losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
     As of March 31, 2010, gross unrealized losses are concentrated within corporate debt securities which is composed of eight, single issuer, trust preferred securities with stated maturities. Such investments are less than 2% of the fair value of the entire investment portfolio. None of the corporate issuers have deferred paying dividends on their issued trust preferred shares in which the Corporation is invested. The fair values of these investments have been impacted by the recent market conditions which have caused risk premiums to increase markedly, resulting in the significant decline in the fair value of the trust preferred securities. Management believes the Corporation will fully recover the cost of these securities and it does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. As a result, Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010 and has recognized the total amount of the impairment in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Realized Gains and Losses
     Gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities are recognized upon sale and are determined using the specific identification method. There were no material gains or losses on sales of available-for-sale securities for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Contractual Maturity of Debt Securities
     The following table shows the remaining contractual maturities and contractual yields of debt securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale as of March 31, 2010. Estimated lives on mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities as issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

17


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                                    Residential                              
                            Residential     collateralized                              
                            collateralized     mortgage                              
                    Residential     mortgage     obligations -                              
    U.S.             mortgage backed     obligations - U.S.     non U.S.                              
    Government     U.S. States     securities - U.S.     Government     Government     Corporate                     Weighted  
    agency     and political     Government     agency     agency     debt     Other             Average  
    debentures     subdivisions     agency obligations     obligations     obligations     securities     securities     Total     Yield  
Securities Available for Sale
                                                                       
Remaining maturity:
                                                                       
One year or less
  $ 40,053     $ 11,477     $ 22,709     $ 22,302     $     $     $ 51     $ 96,592       2.62 %
Over one year through five years
    227,554       14,157       1,686,870       750,017       20             203       2,678,821       3.61 %
Over five years through ten years
          59,542                               253       59,795       5.97 %
Over ten years
    12,026       207,810                         43,794       160       263,790       4.86 %
 
                                                     
Fair Value
  $ 279,633     $ 292,986     $ 1,709,579     $ 772,319     $ 20     $ 43,794     $ 667     $ 3,098,998       3.82 %
 
                                                       
Amortized Cost
  $ 280,327     $ 288,439     $ 1,653,689     $ 752,443     $ 20     $ 61,397     $ 667     $ 3,036,982          
 
                                                       
Weighted-Average Yield
    0.95 %     6.07 %     4.15 %     3.41 %     3.93 %     0.96 %     0.00 %     3.82 %        
Weighted-Average Maturity
    2.4       10.4       3.3       2.5       4.0       17.6       13.2       4.0          
 
                                                                       
Securities Held to Maturity
                                                                       
Remaining maturity:
                                                                       
One year or less
  $     $ 19,163     $     $     $     $     $     $ 19,163       5.97 %
Over one year through five years
          3,417                                     3,417       5.97 %
Over five years through ten years
          9,619                                     9,619       5.97 %
Over ten years
          35,057                                     35,057       7.46 %
 
                                                     
Fair Value
  $     $ 67,256     $     $     $     $     $     $ 67,256       6.74 %
 
                                                       
Amortized Cost
  $     $ 67,256     $     $     $     $     $     $ 67,256          
 
                                                       
Weighted-Average Yield
            6.74 %                                             6.74 %        
Weighted-Average Maturity
            9.6                                               9.6          
4. Allowance for loan losses
     The Corporation’s Credit Policy Division manages credit risk by establishing common credit policies for its subsidiary bank, participating in approval of its loans, conducting reviews of loan portfolios, providing centralized consumer underwriting, collections and loan operation services, and overseeing loan workouts. The Corporation’s objective is to minimize losses from its commercial lending activities and to maintain consumer losses at acceptable levels that are stable and consistent with growth and profitability objectives.
     Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 4 (Allowance for Loan Losses) in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”) more fully describe the components of the allowance for loan loss model.
     There was no further credit detioriation requiring an allowance for loan losses related to the $523.3 million of acquired loans at March 31, 2010.
     The activity within the allowance for loan loss for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2009, is shown in the following table:

18


Table of Contents

                         
    Three months ended     Year ended  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009     2009  
Allowance for loan losses-beginning of period
  $ 115,092     $ 103,757     $ 103,757  
Loans charged off:
                       
Commercial
    8,895       4,554       39,685  
Mortgage
    1,646       923       4,960  
Installment
    8,805       8,438       31,622  
Home equity
    2,070       1,535       7,200  
Credit cards
    4,168       2,967       13,558  
Leases
    20             97  
Overdrafts
    591       519       2,591  
 
                 
Total charge-offs
    26,195       18,936       99,713  
 
                 
Recoveries:
                       
Commercial
    372       224       890  
Mortgage
    25       26       270  
Installment
    2,017       2,401       8,329  
Home equity
    257       85       494  
Credit cards
    473       387       1,710  
Manufactured housing
    31       53       171  
Leases
    9       5       57  
Overdrafts
    232       190       694  
 
                 
Total recoveries
    3,416       3,371       12,615  
 
                 
 
Net charge-offs
    22,779       15,565       87,098  
Provision for loan losses
    25,493       18,065       98,433  
 
                 
Allowance for loan losses-end of period
  $ 117,806     $ 106,257     $ 115,092  
 
                 
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
     Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 are as follows:
                                 
    Commercial     Retail     Wealth     Total  
Balance at January 1, 2010
  $ 73,827     $ 59,038     $ 6,733     $ 139,598  
Goodwill acquired:
                               
First Bank branches
    46,414       1,933             48,347  
 
                       
Balance at March 31, 2010
  $ 120,241     $ 60,971     $ 6,733     $ 187,945  
 
                       
     On February 19, 2010 the Bank completed the acquisition of certain assets and the transfer of certain liabilities with respect to 24 branches of First Bank located in the greater Chicago, Illinois area and recognized $48.3 million of goodwill. $45.3 million of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill associated with this acquisition was

19


Table of Contents

allocated to the Corporation’s reporting units based on the composition of the assets acquired.
     These acquisitions are more fully described in Note 2 (Business Combinations).
Other Intangible Assets
     The following tables show the gross carrying amount and the amount of accumulated amortization of intangible assets subject to amortization.
                         
    March 31, 2010  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Core deposit intangibles
  $ 9,326     $ (4,380 )   $ 4,946  
Non-compete covenant
    102       (6 )     96  
Lease intangible
    617             617  
 
                 
 
  $ 10,045     $ (4,386 )   $ 5,659  
 
                 
                         
    December 31, 2009  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Core deposit intangibles
  $ 5,210     $ (4,154 )   $ 1,056  
Non-compete covenant
    102             102  
 
                 
 
  $ 5,312     $ (4,154 )   $ 1,158  
 
                 
                         
    March 31, 2009  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Core deposit intangibles
  $ 5,210     $ (3,894 )   $ 1,316  
 
                 
     As a result of the ABL Loan acquisition on December 15, 2009, a non-compete asset was recognized at its acquisition date fair value of $0.1 million. This non-compete asset will be amortized on an accelerated basis over its estimated useful life of ten years.
     As a result of the acquisition of the First Bank branches on February 19, 2010, a core deposit intangible asset was recognized at its acquisition date fair value of $3.2 million and a lease intangible asset was recognized at its acquisition date fair value of $0.6 million. The core deposit intangible asset will be amortized on an accelerated basis over its useful life of ten years, and the lease intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining weighted average lease terms.

20


Table of Contents

     A core deposit intangible asset with an acquisition date fair value of $1.0 million was recognized as a result of the George Washington acquisition on February 19, 2010. The core deposit intangible asset will be amortized on an accelerated basis over its useful life of ten years.
     These acquisitions are more fully described in Note 2 (Business Combinations).
     Intangible asset amortization expense was $0.2 million and $0.1 for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows: 2010 — $1.4 million; 2011 — $1.2 million; 2012 — $1.0 million; 2013 — $0.4 million; and 2014 — $0.4 million.
6. Earnings per share
     The reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the treasury stock method and presented as follows:

21


Table of Contents

                 
    Quarter ended     Quarter ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2010     2009  
BASIC EPS:
               
 
               
Net income
  $ 18,021     $ 29,434  
Less: preferred dividend
          (1,667 )
Less: accretion of preferred stock discount
          (204 )
 
           
 
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 18,021     $ 27,563  
 
           
 
               
Average common shares outstanding (*)
    87,771       82,514  
 
           
 
               
Net income per share — basic
  $ 0.21     $ 0.33  
 
           
 
               
DILUTED EPS:
               
 
               
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 18,021     $ 27,563  
Add: interest expense on convertible bonds
           
 
           
 
  $ 18,021     $ 27,563  
 
           
Avg common shares outstanding (*)
    87,771       82,514  
Add: Equivalents from stock options and restricted stock
    6       9  
Add: Equivalents-convertible bonds
           
 
           
Average common shares and equivalents outstanding (*)
    87,777       82,523  
 
           
 
Net income per common share — diluted
  $ 0.21     $ 0.33  
 
           
 
*   Average common shares outstanding have been restated as of March 31, 2009 to reflect stock dividends of 611,582 shares declared April 28, 2009 and 609,560 shares declared on August 20, 2009.
     For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 options to purchase 4.6 million and 5.5 million shares, respectively, were outstanding, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive.
     On January 9, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) of $125.0 million of newly issued FirstMerit non-voting preferred shares as part of the Treasury’s Troubled Assets Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation issued and sold to the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $125.0 million in cash (1) 125,000 shares of FirstMerit’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Shares, Series A, each without par value and having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (2) a warrant to purchase 952,260 FirstMerit common shares, each without par value, at an exercise price of $19.69 per share. At March 31, 2009, the warrant was outstanding, but not included in the computation of diluted earning per share because it was antidilutive.

22


Table of Contents

     On April 22, 2009, the Corporation completed the repurchase of all 125,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A. On May 27, 2009, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the warrant held by the Treasury.
     On March 3, 2010, the Corporation entered into two distribution agency agreements with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (collectively, the “Sales Agents”), pursuant to which the Corporation may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Sales of the common stock are made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the Nasdaq Global Select Market at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed with the Sales Agents. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation sold 3.9 million shares with an average value of $20.91 per share.
7. Segment Information
     Management monitors the Corporation’s results by an internal performance measurement system, which provides lines of business results and key performance measures. The profitability measurement system is based on internal Management methodologies designed to produce consistent results and reflect the underlying economics of the businesses. The development and application of these methodologies is a dynamic process. Accordingly, these measurement tools and assumptions may be revised periodically to reflect methodological, product, and/or management organizational changes. Further, these tools measure financial results that support the strategic objectives and internal organizational structure of the Corporation. Consequently, the information presented is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions.
     A description of each business, selected financial performance, and the methodologies used to measure financial performance are presented below.
    Commercial — The commercial line of business provides a full range of lending, depository, and related financial services to middle-market corporate, industrial, financial, business banking (formerly known as small business), public entities, and leasing clients. Commercial also includes personal business from commercial loan clients in coordination with the Wealth Management segment. Products and services offered include commercial term loans, revolving credit arrangements, asset-based lending, leasing, commercial mortgages, real estate construction lending, letters of credit, cash management services and other depository products.
 
    Retail — The retail line of business includes consumer lending and deposit gathering, residential mortgage loan origination and servicing, and branch-based small business banking (formerly known as the “micro business” line). Retail offers a variety of retail financial products and services including consumer direct and indirect installment loans, debit and credit cards, debit gift cards, residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, deposit products, fixed and variable annuities and ATM network services. Deposit products include checking, savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit.
 
    Wealth — The wealth line of business offers a broad array of asset management, private banking, financial planning, estate settlement and administration, credit and deposit

23


Table of Contents

      products and services. Trust and investment services include personal trust and planning, investment management, estate settlement and administration services. Retirement plan services focus on investment management and fiduciary activities. Brokerage and insurance delivers retail mutual funds, other securities, variable and fixed annuities, personal disability and life insurance products and brokerage services. Private banking provides credit, deposit and asset management solutions for affluent clients.
 
    Other — The other line of business includes activities that are not directly attributable to one of the three principal lines of business. Included in the Other category are the parent company, eliminations companies, community development operations, the Treasury Group, which includes the securities portfolio, wholesale funding and asset liability management activities, and the economic impact of certain assets, capital and support function not specifically identifiable with the three primary lines of business.
     The accounting policies of the lines of businesses are the same as those of the Corporation described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to the 2009 Form 10-K. Funds transfer pricing is used in the determination of net interest income by assigning a cost for funds used or credit for funds provided to assets and liabilities within each business unit. Assets and liabilities are match-funded based on their maturity, prepayment and/or re-pricing characteristics. As a result, the three primary lines of business are generally insulated from changes in interest rates. Changes in net interest income due to changes in rates are reported in Other by the Treasury Group. Capital has been allocated on an economic risk basis. Loans and lines of credit have been allocated capital based upon their respective credit risk. Asset management holdings in the Wealth segment have been allocated capital based upon their respective market risk related to assets under management. Normal business operating risk has been allocated to each line of business by the level of noninterest expense. Mismatch between asset and liability cash flow as well as interest rate risk for mortgage servicing rights and the origination business franchise value have been allocated capital based upon their respective asset/liability management risk. The provision for loan loss is allocated based upon the actual net charge-offs of each respective line of business, adjusted for loan growth and changes in risk profile. Noninterest income and expenses directly attributable to a line of business are assigned to that line of business. Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated to the business line by various activity based cost formulas.
     The Corporation’s business is conducted solely in the United States of America. The following tables present a summary of financial results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

24


Table of Contents

                                         
                                    FirstMerit
March 31, 2010   Commercial   Retail   Wealth   Other   Consolidated
OPERATIONS:
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 42,649     $ 48,074     $ 4,704     $ (5,033 )   $ 90,394  
Provision for loan losses
    8,354       9,725       782       6,632       25,493  
Other income
    10,212       24,764       7,719       11,254       53,949  
Other expenses
    25,097       51,951       9,352       7,613       94,013  
Net income
    12,621       7,197       1,488       (3,285 )     18,021  
 
                                       
AVERAGES :
                                       
Assets
  $ 4,144,987     $ 2,841,569     $ 294,010     $ 4,076,544     $ 11,357,110  
                                         
                                    FirstMerit
March 31, 2009   Commercial   Retail   Wealth   Other   Consolidated
OPERATIONS:
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 37,647     $ 46,857     $ 4,046     $ (1,656 )   $ 86,894  
Provision for loan losses
    4,500       9,761       2,613       1,191       18,065  
Other income
    10,400       23,976       8,064       12,748       55,188  
Other expenses
    23,582       50,662       9,335       (376 )     83,203  
Net income
    12,977       6,767       106       9,584       29,434  
 
                                       
AVERAGES :
                                       
Assets
  $ 4,199,534     $ 2,900,257     $ 313,109     $ 3,702,142     $ 11,115,042  
8. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
     The Corporation, through its mortgage banking and risk management operations, is party to various derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management and customers’ financing needs. Derivative instruments are contracts between two or more parties that have a notional amount and underlying variable, require no net investment and allow for the net settlement of positions. The notional amount serves as the basis for the payment provision of the contract and takes the form of units, such as shares or dollars. The underlying variable represents a specified interest rate, index or other component. The interaction between the notional amount and the underlying variable determines the number of units to be exchanged between the parties and influences the market value of the derivative contract. Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and do not take into account the effects of master netting agreements. Master netting agreements allow the Corporation to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis, and to offset net derivative positions with related collateral, where applicable.
     The predominant derivative and hedging activities include interest rate swaps and certain mortgage banking activities. Generally, these instruments help the Corporation manage exposure to market risk, and meet customer financing needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value or net interest income will be adversely affected by fluctuations in external factors, such as interest rates, market-driven rates and prices or other economic factors.
Derivatives Designated in Hedge Relationships

25


Table of Contents

     The Corporation uses interest rate swaps to modify its exposure to interest rate risk. For example, the Corporation employs fair value hedging strategies to convert specific fixed-rate loans into variable rate instruments. Gains or losses on the derivative instrument as well as the offsetting gains or losses on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the same line item associated with the hedged item in current earnings. The Corporation also employs cash flow hedging strategies to effectively convert certain floating-rate liabilities into fixed-rate instruments. The effective portion of the gains or losses on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gains or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, are recognized in the current earnings.
     As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the notional values or contractual amounts and fair value of the Corporation’s derivatives designated in hedge relationships were as follows:
                                                                                                   
    Asset Derivatives       Liability Derivatives  
    March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009       March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009  
    Notional/             Notional/             Notional/               Notional/             Notional/             Notional/        
    Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair       Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair  
    Amount     Value (a)     Amount     Value (a)     Amount     Value (a)       Amount     Value (b)     Amount     Value (b)     Amount     Value (b)  
Interest rate swaps:
                                                                                                 
Fair value hedges
  $     $     $ 1,452     $     $ 640     $       $ 370,947     $ 28,762     $ 398,895     $ 27,769     $ 460,159     $ 45,709  
 
(a)   Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
(b)   Included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
     Through the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Advantage Program (“FRAP Program”) a customer received a fixed interest rate commercial loan and the Corporation subsequently converted that fixed rate loan to a variable rate instrument over the term of the loan by entering into an interest rate swap with a dealer counterparty. The Corporation receives a fixed rate payment from the customer on the loan and pays the equivalent amount to the dealer counterparty on the swap in exchange for a variable rate payment based on the one month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) index. These interest rate swaps are designated as fair value hedges. Through application of the “short cut method of accounting”, there is an assumption that the hedges are effective. The Corporation discontinued originating interest rate swaps under the FRAP program in February 2008 and subsequently began a new interest rate swap program for commercial loan customers, termed the Back-to-Back Program.
     The Corporation entered into Federal Funds interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate to offset the risk of future fluctuations in the variable interest rate on Federal Funds borrowings. The Corporation entered into a swap with the counterparty during which time the Corporation paid a fixed rate and received a floating rate based on the current effective Federal Funds rate. The Corporation then borrowed Federal Funds in an amount equal to at least the outstanding notional amount of the swap(s) which resulted in the Corporation being left with a fixed rate instrument. These instruments were designated as cash flow hedges. The last Federal Funds interest rate swap matured in the quarter ended March 31, 2009.

26


Table of Contents

     There were no cash flow hedges outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and there was no activity associated with cash flow hedges for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the amount of the hedge effectiveness on cash flow hedges recognized in OCI and reclassified from OCI into other income as well as the amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in other income is as follows:
                     
        Gain Reclassified        
        from Accumulated OCI     Gain Recognized in  
Amount of Gain / (Loss)     into Income     Income on Derivative  
Recognized in OCI     (Effective Portion)     (Ineffective Portion)  
$ 0     $ 692     $ 328  
               
Derivatives Not Designated in Hedge Relationships
     As of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the notional values or contractual amounts and fair value of the Corporation’s derivatives not designated in hedge relationships were as follows:
                                                                                                   
    Asset Derivatives       Liability Derivatives  
    March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009       March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009  
    Notional/             Notional/             Notional/               Notional/             Notional/             Notional/        
    Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair       Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair     Contract     Fair  
    Amount     Value (a)     Amount     Value (a)     Amount     Value (a)       Amount     Value (b)     Amount     Value (b)     Amount     Value (b)  
Interest rate swaps
  $ 694,277     $ 33,510     $ 639,285     $ 26,840     $ 543,789     $ 42,385       $ 694,277     $ 33,510     $ 686,947     $ 30,717     $ 594,065     $ 48,914  
Mortgage loan commitments
    106,894       1,239       55,023       396       82,519       2,408                                        
Forward sales contracts
    68,290       125       67,085       884       99,565       (1,139 )                                      
TBA Securities
                            211,237       (145 )                                      
Credit contracts
                                          61,876             62,458             62,189        
Other
                                          18,912             18,171             11,551        
 
                                                                         
 
                                                                                                 
Total
  $ 869,461     $ 34,874     $ 761,393     $ 28,120     $ 937,110     $ 43,509       $ 775,065     $ 33,510     $ 767,576     $ 30,717     $ 667,805     $ 48,914  
 
                                                                         
 
(a)   Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
(b)   Included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
     Interest Rate Swaps. In 2008, the Corporation implemented the Back-to-Back Program, which is an interest rate swap program for commercial loan customers. The Back-to-Back Program provides the customer with a fixed rate loan while creating a variable rate asset for the Corporation through the customer entering into an interest rate swap with the Corporation on terms that match the loan. The Corporation offsets its risk exposure by entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with a dealer counterparty. These swaps do not qualify as designated hedges; therefore, each swap is accounted for as a standalone derivative.
     The Corporation had other interest rate swaps associated with fixed rate commercial loans with a notional value of $47.7 million and $50.3 million as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. These swaps were accounted for as standalone derivatives. This portfolio of interest rate swaps was terminated in January 2010.

27


Table of Contents

     Mortgage banking. In the normal course of business, the Corporation sells originated mortgage loans into the secondary mortgage loan markets. During the period of loan origination and prior to the sale of the loans in the secondary market, the Corporation has exposure to movements in interest rates associated with mortgage loans that are in the “mortgage pipeline” and the “mortgage warehouse”. A pipeline loan is one in which the Corporation has entered into a written mortgage loan commitment with a potential borrower that will be held for resale. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within the mortgage warehouse of loans awaiting sale and delivery into the secondary market.
     Written loan commitments that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for resale are considered free-standing derivatives and do not qualify for hedge accounting. Written loan commitments generally have a term of up to 60 days before the closing of the loan. The loan commitment does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor does it guarantee that the Corporation will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, when determining fair value, the Corporation makes estimates of expected “fallout” (loan commitments not expected to close), using models, which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a borrower will abandon an interest rate lock loan commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower interest rate lock loan commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. In addition, expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities are included in the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment.
     Written loan commitments in which the borrower has locked in an interest rate results in market risk to the Corporation to the extent market interest rates change from the rate quoted to the borrower. The Corporation economically hedges the risk of changing interest rates associated with its interest rate lock commitments by entering into forward sales contracts.
     The Corporation’s warehouse (mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value, due to fluctuations in interest rates from the loan’s closing date through the date of sale of the loan into the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, the Corporation enters into forward sales contracts on a significant portion of the warehouse to provide an economic hedge against those changes in fair value.
     Effective August 1, 2008, the Corporation elected to fair value, on a prospective basis, newly originated conforming fixed-rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage warehouse loans. Prior to this election, all warehouse loans were carried at the lower of cost or market and a hedging program was utilized on its mortgage loans held for sale to gain protection for the changes in fair value of the mortgage loans held for sale and the forward sales contracts. As such, both the mortgage loans held for sale and the forward sales contracts were recorded at fair value with ineffective changes in value recorded in current earnings as Loan sales and servicing income. Upon the Corporation’s election to prospectively account for substantially all of its mortgage loan warehouse products at fair value it discontinued the application of designated hedging relationships for new originations.
     The Corporation periodically enters into derivative contracts by purchasing TBA Securities which are utilized as economic hedges of its MSRs to minimize the effects of loss of

28


Table of Contents

value of MSRs associated with increase prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSRs generally will increase while the value of the hedge instruments will decline. The hedges are economic hedges only, and are terminated and reestablished as needed to respond to changes in market conditions. There were no outstanding TBA Securities contracts as of March 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009. The Corporation held $211.2 million in outstanding TBA contracts as of March 31, 2009.
     Credit contracts. Prior to implementation of the Back-to-Back Program, certain of the Corporation’s commercial loan customers entered into interest rate swaps with unaffiliated dealer counterparties. The Corporation entered into swap participations with these dealer counterparties whereby the Corporation guaranteed payment in the event that the counterparty experienced a loss on the interest rate swap due to a failure to pay by the Corporation’s commercial loan customer. The Corporation simultaneously entered into reimbursement agreements with the commercial loan customers obligating the customers to reimburse the Corporation for any payments it makes under the swap participations. The Corporation monitors its payment risk on its swap participations by monitoring the creditworthiness of its commercial loan customers, which is based on the normal credit review process the Corporation would have performed had it entered into these derivative instruments directly with the commercial loan customers. At March 31, 2010, the remaining terms on these swap participation agreements generally ranged from one to nine years. The Corporation’s maximum estimated exposure to written swap participations, as measured by projecting a maximum value of the guaranteed derivative instruments based on interest rate curve simulations and assuming 100% default by all obligors on the maximum values, was approximately $4.1 million as of March 31, 2010. The fair values of the written swap participations were not material at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009.
     Gains and losses recognized in income on non-designated hedging instruments for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
                     
        Amount of Gain / (Loss)  
        Recognized in Income on  
        Derivative  
Derivatives not   Location of Gain / (Loss)            
designated as hedging   Recognized in Income on   Quarter ended,     Quarter ended,  
instruments   Derivative   March 31, 2010     March 31, 2009  
IRLCs
  Other income   $ 843     $ 1,817  
Forward sales contracts
  Other income     (758 )     (622 )
TBA Securities
  Other income           (2,106 )
Credit contracts
  Other income            
Other
  Other expenses            
 
               
Total
      $ 85     $ (911 )
 
               

29


Table of Contents

Counterparty Credit Risk
     Like other financial instruments, derivatives contain an element of “credit risk”— the possibility that the Corporation will incur a loss because a counterparty, which may be a bank, a broker-dealer or a customer, fails to meet its contractual obligations. This risk is measured as the expected positive replacement value of contracts. All derivative contracts may be executed only with exchanges or counterparties approved by the Corporation’s Asset and Liability Committee, and only within the Corporation’s Board of Directors Credit Committee approved credit exposure limits. Where contracts have been created for customers, the Corporation enters into derivatives with dealers to offset its risk exposure. To manage the credit exposure to exchanges and counterparties, the Corporation generally enters into bilateral collateral agreements using standard forms published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. These agreements are to include thresholds of credit exposure or the maximum amount of unsecured credit exposure which the Corporation is willing to assume. Beyond the threshold levels, collateral in the form of securities made available from the investment portfolio or other forms of collateral acceptable under the bilateral collateral agreements are provided. The threshold levels for each counterparty are established by the Corporation’s Asset and Liability Committee. The Corporation generally posts collateral in the form of highly rated Government Agency issued bonds or MBSs. Collateral posted against derivative liabilities was $73.7 million, $70.0 million and $81.9 million as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
9. Benefit Plans
     The Corporation sponsors several qualified and nonqualified pension and other postretirement plans for certain of its employees. The net periodic pension cost is based on estimated values provided by an outside actuary. The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
                 
    Pension Benefits  
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost
               
Service Cost
  $ 1,480     $ 1,322  
Interest Cost
    2,800       2,751  
Expected return on assets
    (3,015 )     (2,805 )
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs
    98       85  
Cumulative net loss
    1,427       758  
 
           
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 2,790     $ 2,111  
 
           

30


Table of Contents

                 
    Postretirement Benefits  
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Cost
               
Service Cost
  $ 15     $ 15  
Interest Cost
    240       299  
Cumulative net loss
    4       9  
 
           
Net Postretirement Benefit Cost
    259       323  
Curtailment Gain
          (9,543 )
 
           
Net periodic postretirement (benefit)/cost
  $ 259     $ (9,220 )
 
           
     In January 2009, FirstMerit announced to employees that the Corporation’s subsidy for retiree medical for current eligible active employees will be discontinued effective March 1, 2009. Eligible employees who retired on or prior to March 1, 2009, were offered subsidized retiree medical coverage until age 65. Employees who retire after March 1, 2009 will not receive the Corporation’s subsidy toward retiree medical coverage. The elimination of Corporation subsidized retiree medical coverage resulted in an accounting curtailment.
     The Corporation maintains a savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all full-time and part-time employees after three months of continuous employment. The savings plan was approved for non-vested employees in the defined benefit pension plan and new hires as of January 1, 2007. Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation has suspended its matching contribution to the savings plan.
10. Fair Value Measurement
     As defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value is based on quoted market prices, when available, for identical or similar assets or liabilities. In the absence of quoted market prices, Management determines the fair value of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities using valuation models or third-party pricing services. Both of these approaches rely on market-based parameters when available, such as interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and credit spreads, or unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs may be based on Management’s judgment, assumptions and estimates related to credit quality, liquidity, interest rates and other relevant inputs.
     GAAP establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for determining fair value that is based on the transparency of the inputs used in the valuation process. The inputs used in determining fair value in each of the three levels of the hierarchy, highest ranking to lowest, are as follows:

31


Table of Contents

    Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
    Level 2 — Valuations of assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities traded in the same market; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
 
    Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs significant to the overall fair value measurement.
     The level in the fair value hierarchy ascribed to a fair value measurement in its entirety is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement.
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
     The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010:
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Available-for-sale securities
  $ 3,404     $ 3,054,523     $ 43,813     $ 3,101,740  
Residential loans held for sale
          16,009               16,009  
Derivative assets
          34,874               34,874  
 
                       
Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis
  $ 3,404     $ 3,105,406     $ 43,813     $ 3,152,623  
 
                       
 
                               
Derivative liabilities
          62,272             62,272  
 
                       
Total liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis
  $     $ 62,272     $     $ 62,272  
 
                       
 
Note:   There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hiearchy during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
     Available-for-sale securities. When quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are valued using the quoted price and are classified as Level 1. The quoted prices are not adjusted. Level 1 instruments include money market mutual funds.
     For certain available-for sale securities, the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent third party pricing service or independent brokers. The detail by level is shown in the table below.

32


Table of Contents

                                 
            Level 2             Level 3  
            Independent             Independent  
    # Issues     Pricing Service     # Issues     Broker Quotes  
U.S. government agency debentures
    18     $ 279,640           $  
U.S States and political subdivisions
    938       292,986              
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    186       1,709,579              
Residential collateralized mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies
    73       772,317       1       1  
Non-agency
    1       1       1       18  
 
                               
Corporate debt securities
                8       43,794  
 
                       
 
    1,216     $ 3,054,523       10     $ 43,813  
 
                       
     Available-for-sale securities classified as Level 2 are valued using the prices obtained from an independent pricing service. The prices are not adjusted. The independent pricing service uses industry standard models to price U.S. Government agencies and MBSs that consider various assumptions, including time value, yield curves, volatility factors, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Securities of obligations of state and political subdivisions are valued using a type of matrix, or grid, pricing in which securities are benchmarked against the treasury rate based on credit rating. For collateralized mortgage securities, depending on the characteristics of a given tranche, a volatility driven multidimensional static model or Option-Adjusted Spread model is generally used. Substantially all assumptions used by the independent pricing service are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data, or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation obtains from the independent pricing service the inputs used to value a sample of securities held in portfolio. The Corporation reviews these inputs to ensure the appropriate classification, within the fair value hierarchy, is ascribed to a fair value measurement in its entirety. In addition, all fair value measurement are reviewed to determine the reasonableness of the measurement relative to changes in observable market data and market information received from outside market participants and analysts.
     Available-for-sale securities classified as level 3 securities are primarily single issuer trust preferred securities. These trust preferred securities, which represent less than 2% of the portfolio at fair value, are valued based on the average of two non-binding broker quotes. Since these securities are thinly traded, the Corporation has determined that using an average of two non-binding broker quotes is a more conservative valuation methodology. The non-binding nature of the pricing results in a classification as Level 3.
     Loans held for sale. Effective August 1, 2008, the Corporation elected to account for residential mortgage loans originated subsequent to such date at fair value. Previously, these residential loans had been recorded at the lower of cost or market value. These loans are regularly traded in active markets through programs offered by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), and observable pricing information is available from market participants. The prices are adjusted

33


Table of Contents

as necessary to include any embedded servicing value in the loans and to take into consideration the specific characteristics of certain loans. These adjustments represent unobservable inputs to the valuation but are not considered significant to the fair value of the loans. Accordingly, residential real estate loans held for sale are classified as Level 2.
     Derivatives. The Corporation’s derivatives include interest rate swaps and written loan commitments and forward sales contracts related to residential mortgage loan origination activity. Valuations for interest rate swaps are derived from third party models whose significant inputs are readily observable market parameters, primarily yield curves, with appropriate adjustments for liquidity and credit risk. These fair value measurements are classified as Level 2. The fair values of written loan commitments and forward sales contracts on the associated loans are based on quoted prices for similar loans in the secondary market, consistent with the valuation of residential mortgage loans held for sale. Expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities are included in the fair value measurement of written loan commitments. A written loan commitment does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor does it guarantee that the Corporation will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, when determining fair value, the Corporation makes estimates of expected “fallout” (locked pipeline loans not expected to close), using models, which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a borrower will abandon a fixed rate loan commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower fixed rate loan commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. Fallout is not a significant input to the fair value of the written loan commitments in their entirety. These measurements are classified as Level 2.
     Derivative assets are typically secured through securities with financial counterparties or cross collateralization with a borrowing customer. Derivative liabilities are typically secured through the Corporation pledging securities to financial counterparties or, in the case of a borrowing customer, by the right of setoff. The Corporation considers factors such as the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties, right of setoff, and remaining maturities in determining the appropriate fair value adjustments. All derivative counterparties approved by the Corporation’s Asset and Liability Committee are regularly reviewed, and appropriate business action is taken to adjust the exposure to certain counterparties, as necessary. Counterparty exposure is evaluated by netting positions that are subject to master netting agreements, as well as considering the amount of marketable collateral securing the position. This approach used to estimate impacted exposures to counterparties is also used by the Corporation to estimate its own credit risk on derivative liability positions. To date, no material losses due to counterparty’s inability to pay any uncollateralized position have been incurred. There was no significant change in value of derivative assets and liabilities attributed to credit risk for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
     The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 are summarized follows:

34


Table of Contents

                                                 
                                            Total changes  
            Total     Purchases, sales             Fair value     in fair values  
    Fair Value     unrealized     issuances and             quarter ended     included in current  
    January 1, 2010     gains/(losses) (a)     settlements, net     Transfers     March 31, 2010     period earnings  
Other debt securities
  $ 42,447     $ 1,366     $     $     $ 43,813     $  
 
                                   
 
(a)   Reported in other comprehensive income (loss)
     Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, nonrecurring valuations are the result of applying accounting standards that require assets or liabilities to be assessed for impairment, or recorded at the lower-of-cost or fair value. The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2010:
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Mortgage servicing rights
  $     $     $ 21,201     $ 21,201  
Impaired and nonaccrual loans
                109,645       109,645  
Other property (1)
                28,850       28,850  
 
                       
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
  $     $     $ 159,696     $ 159,696  
 
                       
 
(1)   Represents the fair value, and related change in the value, of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned by the Corporation during the period.
     Mortgage Servicing Rights. The Corporation carries its mortgage servicing rights at lower of cost or fair value, and therefore, can be subject to fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis. Since sales of mortgage servicing rights tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, the Corporation relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model, incorporating assumptions about loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors, to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. Since the valuation model uses significant unobservable inputs, the Corporation classifies mortgage servicing rights as Level 3.
     The Corporation utilizes a third party vendor to perform the modeling to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The Corporation reviews the estimated fair values and assumptions used by the third party in the model on a quarterly basis. The Corporation also compares the estimates of fair value and assumptions to recent market activity and against its own experience.
     Prepayment Speeds: Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors favorable to prepayments occur there is a corresponding increase in prepayments as customers refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage loan is prepaid the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing that loan are terminated, resulting in a reduction of the fair value of the capitalized mortgage servicing rights. To the extent that actual

35


Table of Contents

borrower prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant earnings volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, the Corporation utilizes a third-party prepayment model, which is based upon statistically derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving historical borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary market, current market interest rates and other factors, including the Corporation’s own historical prepayment experience. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are made for each product type within the mortgage servicing rights portfolio on a monthly basis.
     Discount Rate: Represents the rate at which expected cash flows are discounted to arrive at the net present value of servicing income. Discount rates will change with market conditions (i.e., supply vs. demand) and be reflective of the yields expected to be earned by market participants investing in mortgage servicing rights.
     Cost to Service: Expected costs to service are estimated based upon the incremental costs that a market participant would use in evaluating the potential acquisition of mortgage servicing rights.
     Float Income: Estimated float income is driven by expected float balances (principal, interest and escrow payments that are held pending remittance to the investor or other third party) and current market interest rates, including the six month average of the three-month LIBOR index, which are updated on a monthly basis for purposes of estimating the fair value of mortgage servicing rights.
     Impaired and nonaccrual loans. Fair value adjustments for these items typically occur when there is evidence of impairment. Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of Management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. The Corporation measures fair value based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or personal property including equipment and inventory. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of the collateral is determined based on internal estimates as well as third party appraisals or price opinions. These measurements were classified as Level 3.
     Other Property. Other property includes foreclosed assets and properties securing residential and commercial loans. Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosures are recorded initially at the lower of the loan balance or fair value, less estimated selling costs, upon the date of foreclosure. Fair value is based upon appraisals or third-party price opinions and, accordingly, considered a Level 3 classification. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are updated periodically, and the assets may be marked down further, reflecting a new carrying amount.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
     The Corporation may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in net

36


Table of Contents

income. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made.
     Effective August 1, 2008, the Corporation elected to fair value newly originated conforming fixed rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held for sale. Previously, these loans had been recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The election of the fair value option aligns the accounting for these loans with the related hedges. It also eliminates the requirements of hedge accounting under GAAP. The fair value option was not elected for loans held for investment.
     The following table reflects the differences, as of March 31, 2010, between the fair value carrying amount of residential mortgages held for sale and the aggregate unpaid principal amount the Corporation is contractually entitled to receive at maturity. None of these loans were 90 days or more past due, nor were any on nonaccrual status.
                         
                    Fair Value  
                    Carrying Amount  
    Fair Value     Aggregate Unpaid     Less Aggregate  
    Carrying Amount     Principal     Unpaid Principal  
Loans held for sale reported at fair value
  $ 16,009     $ 15,669     $ 340  
 
                 
     Interest income on loans held for sale is accrued on the principal outstanding primarily using the “simple-interest” method.
     Loans held for sale are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current earnings. The change in fair value for residential loans held for sale measured at fair value included in earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was not significant.
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
     The carrying amount and fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments are shown below.

37


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2010   December 31, 2009
    Carrying   Fair   Carrying   Fair
    Amount   Value   Amount   Value
Financial assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 721,938     $ 721,938     $ 161,033     $ 161,033  
Investment securities
    3,301,039       3,301,039       2,744,838       2,744,838  
Loan held for sale
    16,009       16,009       16,828       16,828  
Net noncovered loans
    7,072,716       6,673,377       6,808,397       6,362,674  
Covered loans and loss share receivable
    277,315       277,315              
Accrued interest receivable
    41,763       41,763       39,274       39,274  
Mortgage servicing rights
    20,652       21,201       20,784       22,241  
Derivative assets
    34,874       34,874       28,120       28,120  
 
                               
Financial liabilities:
                               
Deposits
  $ 9,370,009     $ 9,378,490     $ 7,515,796     $ 7,519,604  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    896,330       899,729       996,345       998,645  
Wholesale borrowings
    677,715       685,442       740,105       745,213  
Accrued interest payable
    15,303       15,303       11,336       11,336  
Derivative liabilities
    62,272       62,272       58,486       58,486  
     The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of each class of financial instrument presented:
     Cash and due from banks — The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.
     Investment Securities — See Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value above.
     Net noncovered loans — The loan portfolio was segmented based on loan type and repricing characteristics. Carrying values are used to estimate fair values of variable rate loans. A discounted cash flow method was used to estimate the fair value of fixed-rate loans. Discounting was based on the contractual cash flows, and discount rates are based on the year-end yield curve plus a spread that reflects current pricing on loans with similar characteristics. If applicable, prepayment assumptions are factored into the fair value determination based on historical experience and current economic conditions.
     Loans held for sale — The majority of loans held for sale are residential mortgage loans which are recorded at fair value. All other loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market, less costs to sell. See Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value above.
     Covered loans — Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and current discount rates. Loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash flows.
     Loss share receivable — This loss sharing asset is measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the covered assets and is not transferable

38


Table of Contents

with the covered assets should FirstMerit Bank choose to dispose of them. Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. These cash flows were discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC.
     Accrued interest receivable — The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.
     Mortgage servicing rights — See Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value above.
     Deposits — The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, which includes demand deposits, money market accounts and other savings accounts, are established at carrying value because of the customers’ ability to withdraw funds immediately. A discounted cash flow method is used to estimate the fair value of fixed rate time deposits. Discounting was based on the contractual cash flows and the current rates at which similar deposits with similar remaining maturities would be issued.
     Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and wholesale borrowings — The carrying amount of variable rate borrowings including federal funds purchased is considered to be their fair value. Quoted market prices or the discounted cash flow method was used to estimate the fair value of the Corporation’s long-term debt. Discounting was based on the contractual cash flows and the current rate at which debt with similar terms could be issued.
     Accrued interest payable — The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.
     Derivative assets and liabilities — See Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value above.
11. Mortgage Servicing Rights and Mortgage Servicing Activity
     The Corporation serviced for third parties approximately $2.0 billion of residential mortgage loans at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Loan servicing fees, not including valuation changes included in loan sales and servicing income, were $1.3 million and $1.2 million in each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     Servicing rights are presented within other assets on the balance sheet. The retained servicing rights are initially valued at fair value. Since mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, the Corporation relies primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis model to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. Additional information can be found in Note 10 (Fair Value Measurement). Mortgage servicing rights are subsequently measured using the amortization method. Accordingly, the mortgage servicing rights are amortized over the period of, and in proportion to, the estimated net servicing income and is recorded in loan sales and servicing income.

39


Table of Contents

     Changes in the carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights are as follows:
                 
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 20,784     $ 18,778  
Addition of mortgage servicing rights
    717       1,437  
Amortization
    (849 )     (790 )
Changes in allowance for impairment
          (364 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 20,652     $ 19,061  
 
           
Fair value at end of period
  $ 21,201     $ 19,078  
 
           
     On a quarterly basis, the Corporation assesses its capitalized servicing rights for impairment based on their current fair value. For purposes of the impairment, the servicing rights are disaggregated based on loan type and interest rate which are the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans. A valuation allowance is established through a charge to earnings to the extent the amortized cost of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the estimated fair value by stratification. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for the stratification, the valuation is reduced through a recovery to earnings. No valuation allowances were required as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. No permanent impairment losses were written off against the allowance during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
     Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of the mortgage servicing rights related to immediate 10% and 25% adverse changes in those assumptions at March 31, 2010 are presented in the following table below. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in the fair value based on 10% variation in the prepayment speed assumption generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the prepayment speed assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the below table, the effect of a variation in the discount rate assumption on the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights is calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, changes in prepayment speed estimates could result in changes in the discount rates), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
         
Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR)
    9.75 %
Decrease in fair value from 10% adverse change
  $ 776  
Decrease in fair value from 25% adverse change
    1,864  
Discount rate assumption
    9.71 %
Decrease in fair value from 100 basis point adverse change
  $ 731  
Decrease in fair value from 200 basis point adverse change
    1,409  
Expected weighted-average life (in months)
    106.1  

40


Table of Contents

12. Contingencies and Guarantees
     Litigation
     The nature of the Corporation’s business results in a certain amount of litigation. Accordingly, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, is of the opinion that the ultimate liability of such pending matters will not have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
     Commitments to Extend Credit
     Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Loan commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance. Additional information is provided in Note 8 (Derivatives and Hedging Activities). Commitments generally are extended at the then prevailing interest rates, have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Loan commitments involve credit risk not reflected on the balance sheet. The Corporation mitigates exposure to credit risk with internal controls that guide how applications for credit are reviewed and approved, how credit limits are established and, when necessary, how demands for collateral are made. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. Management evaluates the creditworthiness of each prospective borrower on a case-by-case basis and, when appropriate, adjusts the allowance for probable credit losses inherent in all commitments. The allowance for unfunded lending commitments at March 31, 2010 was $6.3 million. Additional information pertaining to this allowance is included under the heading “Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation of this report.
     The following table shows the remaining contractual amount of each class of commitments to extend credit as of March 31, 2010. This amount represents the Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss if the customer were to draw upon the full amount of the commitment and subsequently default on payment for the total amount of the then outstanding loan.
         
    March 31, 2010  
Loan Commitments
       
Commercial
  $ 1,435,466  
Consumer
    1,652,345  
 
     
Total loan commitments
  $ 3,087,811  
 
     

41


Table of Contents

     Guarantees
     The Corporation is a guarantor in certain agreements with third parties. The following table shows the types of guarantees the Corporation had outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
         
    March 31, 2010  
Financial guarantees
       
Standby letters of credit
  $ 144,963  
Loans sold with recourse
    55,439  
 
     
Total loan commitments
  $ 200,402  
 
     
     Standby letters of credit obligate the Corporation to pay a specified third party when a customer fails to repay an outstanding loan or debt instrument, or fails to perform some contractual nonfinancial obligation. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Collateral held varies, but may include marketable securities, equipment and real estate. Any amounts drawn under standby letters of credit are treated as loans; they bear interest and pose the same credit risk to the Corporation as a loan. Except for short-term guarantees of $88.4 million at March 31, 2010, the remaining guarantees extend in varying amounts through 2014.
     In recourse arrangements, the Corporation accepts 100% recourse. By accepting 100% recourse, the Corporation is assuming the entire risk of loss due to borrower default. The Corporation uses the same credit policies originating loans which will be sold with recourse as it does for any other type of loan. The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss, if the borrower completely failed to perform and if the collateral or other forms of credit enhancement all prove to be of no value, is represented by the notional amount less any allowance for possible loan losses. An allowance of $3.0 million was established as of March 31, 2010.

42


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
AVERAGE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
Fully Tax-equivalent Interest Rates and Interest Differential
                                                                         
FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION AND                  
SUBSIDIARIES   Three months ended     Year ended     Three months ended  
(Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
             
ASSETS
                                                                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 521,666                     $ 183,215                     $ 209,922                  
Investment securities and federal funds sold:
                                                                       
U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agency obligations (taxable)
    2,377,729       22,909       3.91 %     2,222,771       97,871       4.40 %     2,251,028       25,954       4.68 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions (tax exempt)
    344,899       5,139       6.04 %     321,919       19,718       6.13 %     320,943       4,914       6.21 %
Other securities and federal funds sold
    194,991       1,986       4.13 %     204,272       8,394       4.11 %     212,995       2,341       4.46 %
 
                                                           
Total investment securities and federal funds sold
    2,917,619       30,034       4.17 %     2,748,962       125,983       4.58 %     2,784,966       33,209       4.84 %
 
                                                                       
Loans held for sale
    14,538       184       5.13 %     19,289       1,032       5.35 %     23,248       322       5.62 %
Noncovered loans
    7,022,381       81,829       4.73 %     7,156,983       339,381       4.74 %     7,381,019       87,508       4.81 %
Covered loans and loss share receivable
    126,333       1,761       5.65 %                                    
 
                                                           
Total earning assets
    10,080,871       113,808       4.58 %     9,925,234       466,396       4.70 %     10,189,233       121,039       4.82 %
 
                                                                       
Allowance for loan losses
    (115,031 )                     (108,017 )                     (102,533 )                
Other assets
    869,604                       793,062                       818,420                  
 
                                                                 
 
                                                                       
Total assets
  $ 11,357,110                     $ 10,793,494                     $ 11,115,042                  
 
                                                                 
 
                                                                       
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                                                        
Deposits:
                                                                       
Demand — non-interest bearing
  $ 2,146,969                 $ 1,910,171                 $ 1,767,885              
Demand — interest bearing
    687,233       152       0.09 %     656,367       600       0.09 %     655,279       155       0.10 %
Savings and money market accounts
    3,709,246       7,601       0.83 %     2,886,842       23,472       0.81 %     2,638,166       5,377       0.83 %
Certificates and other time deposits
    1,797,348       6,406       1.45 %     2,056,208       54,610       2.66 %     2,582,788       18,588       2.92 %
 
                                                           
 
                                                                       
Total deposits
    8,340,796       14,159       0.69 %     7,509,588       78,682       1.05 %     7,644,118       24,120       1.28 %
 
                                                                       
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    951,927       1,127       0.48 %     1,013,167       4,764       0.47 %     941,112       999       0.43 %
Wholesale borrowings
    708,414       6,174       3.53 %     952,979       27,317       2.87 %     1,151,777       7,343       2.59 %
 
                                                           
 
                                                                       
Total interest bearing liabilities
    7,854,168       21,460       1.11 %     7,565,563       110,763       1.46 %     7,969,122       32,462       1.65 %
 
Other liabilities
    262,405                       267,835                       304,759                  
 
                                                                       
Shareholders’ equity
    1,093,568                       1,049,925                       1,073,276                  
 
                                                                 
 
                                                                       
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 11,357,110                     $ 10,793,494                     $ 11,115,042                  
 
                                                                 
 
                                                                       
Net yield on earning assets
  $ 10,080,871       92,348       3.72 %   $ 9,925,234       355,633       3.58 %   $ 10,189,233       88,577       3.53 %
 
                                                     
 
                                                                       
Interest rate spread
                    3.47 %                     3.24 %                     3.17 %
 
                                                                 
 
Note:   Interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans has been adjusted to a fully-taxable equivalent basis.
Nonaccrual loans have been included in the average balances.

43


Table of Contents

HIGHLIGHTS OF FIRST QUARTER 2010 PERFORMANCE
Earnings Summary
     The Corporation reported first quarter 2010 net income of $18.0 million, or $0.21 per diluted share. This compares with $14.5 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter 2009 and $29.4 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the first quarter 2009.
     Returns on average common equity (“ROE”) and average assets (“ROA”) for the first quarter 2010 were 6.68% and 0.64%, respectively, compared with 5.38% and 0.54% for the fourth quarter 2009 and 12.39% and 1.07% for the first quarter 2009.
     In the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation completed two strategic acquisitions in the Chicago area: 24 branches of First Bank and certain assets and substantially all of the deposits of the 4-branch George Washington Savings Bank.
     Net interest margin was 3.72% for the first quarter of 2010 compared with 3.64% for the fourth quarter of 2009 and 3.53% for the first quarter of 2009. The Corporation’s continued emphasis on core deposit gathering and shifting deposit mix away from higher-priced certificate of deposit products drove the expansion over both time periods.
     Average loans during the first quarter of 2010 increased $150.5 million, or 2.16%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 and decreased $281.5 million, or 3.81%, compared with the first quarter of 2009. Excluding $286.8 million in average loan balances related to the aforementioned Chicago bank acquisitions, average loans decreased $119.9 million, or 1.73%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 and decreased $568.4 million, or 7.70% compared with the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in average balances reflects a reduced level of commercial and consumer credit demand and the focus on debt reduction by the Corporation’s business and retail customer base.
     Average deposits during the first quarter of 2010 increased $943.2 million, or 12.75%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 and increased $696.7 million, or 9.11%, compared with the first quarter of 2009. During the first quarter of 2010 the Corporation increased its average core deposits, which excludes time deposits, by $687.3 million, or 11.74%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2009, and $1.5 billion, or 29.28%, compared with the first quarter of 2009. Acquisitions represent $706.5 million of average deposit growth and $275.5 million of average core deposit growth in the first quarter of 2010.
     Average investments during the first quarter of 2010 increased $168.4 million, or 6.13%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 and increased $132.7 million, or 4.76%, over the first quarter of 2009.
     Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) basis was $92.3 million in the first quarter 2010 compared with $89.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $88.6 million in the first quarter of 2009. Compared with the fourth quarter of 2009, average earning assets increased $366.7 million, or 3.77% and decreased $108.4 million or 1.06% compared to the first quarter of 2009.

44


Table of Contents

     Noninterest income net of securities transactions for the first quarter of 2010 was $53.9 million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 6.27%, from the fourth quarter of 2009 and a decrease of $1.2 million, or 2.25%, from the first quarter of 2009 which included $9.5 million due to curtailment of the postretirement medical benefit plan for active employees. Included in noninterest income in the first quarter 2010 was a $5.1 million ($3.3 million after-tax) gain related to the George Washington acquisition.
     The primary changes in other income for the 2010 first quarter as compared to the first quarter of 2009 were as follows: trust income was $5.3 million, an increase of 10.25% primarily due to advances in the equity markets; service charges on deposits were $15.4 million, an increase of 8.49% due to an increase in new accounts; credit card fees were $11.6 million, an increase of 4.28% attributable to the improvement in the economy; loan sales and servicing income was $3.2 million, an increase of 38.63%, primarily attributable to refinancing in the current low rate mortgage market environment; bank owned life insurance income was $5.7 million, an increase of $2.6 million attributable to realized policy proceeds. A separate line item was added for the $5.1 million gain on the acquisition of George Washington, while also separately stated in the first quarter of 2009 was the $9.5 million adjustment due to the curtailment of the postretirement medical plan for active employees.
     Other income, net of securities gains, as a percentage of net revenue for the first quarter of 2010 was 36.88% compared with 36.28% for fourth quarter of 2009 and 38.39% for the first quarter of 2009. Net revenue is defined as net interest income, on a FTE basis, plus other income, less gains from securities sales.
     Noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2010 was $94.0 million, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 0.92%, from the fourth quarter of 2009 and an increase of $10.8 million, or 12.99%, from the first quarter of 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, increases in operating expenses compared to the first quarter 2009 were primarily attributable to increased salary and benefits, professional services and FDIC expense. One time expenses associated with data processing conversions and related expenses for the acquisitions totaled $2.7 million.
     During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation reported an efficiency ratio of 64.10%, compared with 67.74% for the fourth quarter of 2009 and 57.81% for the first quarter of 2009.
     Net charge-offs totaled $22.8 million, or 1.36% of average loans, in the first quarter of 2010 compared with $31.2 million, or 1.79% of average loans, in the fourth quarter 2009 and $15.6 million, or 0.86% of average loans, in the first quarter of 2009.
     Nonperforming assets totaled $123.3 million at March 31, 2010, an increase of $22.3 million compared with December 31, 2009 and an increase of $47.1 million compared with March 31, 2009. Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2010 represented 1.80% of period-end loans plus other real estate compared with 1.48% at December 31, 2009 and 1.04% at March 31, 2009.
     The allowance for loan losses totaled $117.8 million at March 31, 2010, an increase of $2.7 million from December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was 1.72% of period-end loans compared with 1.68% at December 31, 2009 and 1.45% at March 31,

45


Table of Contents

2009. The allowance for credit losses is the sum of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. For comparative purposes the allowance for credit losses was 1.82% of period-end loans at March 31, 2010, compared with 1.77% at December 31, 2009 and 1.53% at March 31, 2009. The allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 110.80% at March 31, 2010, compared with 131.82% at December 31, 2009 and 159.93% at March 31, 2009.
     The Corporation’s total assets at March 31, 2010 were $12.3 billion, an increase of $1.8 billion inclusive of intangible assets, or 16.92%, compared with December 31, 2009 and an increase of $1.4 billion, or 12.32%, compared with March 31, 2009. Total loans increased $436.3 million, or 6.30%, compared with December 31, 2009 and increased $9.0 million, or 0.12%, over March 31, 2009.
     Total deposits were $9.4 billion at March 31, 2010, an increase of $1.9 billion, or 24.67%, from December 31, 2009 and an increase of $1.7 billion, or 22.03%, from March 31, 2009. The increase compared with March 31, 2009 was driven by both an overall increase in savings and demand deposits and the acquisitions of the First Bank branches and George Washington. Core deposits totaled $7.0 billion at March 31, 2010, an increase of $852.4 million, or 13.85%, from December 31, 2009 and an increase of $1.7 billion, or 32.70%, from March 31, 2009.
     Shareholders’ equity was $1,155.4 million at March 31, 2010, compared with $1,065.6 million at December 31, 2009 and $1,084.3 million at March 31, 2009. The Corporation maintained a strong capital position as tangible common equity to assets was 7.93% at March 31, 2010, compared with 8.89% and 7.60% at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. The common dividend per share paid in the first quarter 2010 was $0.16.
Acquisitions
     In the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation completed two strategic acquisitions. On February 19, 2010, the Bank completed the acquisition of certain assets and the transfer of certain liabilities with respect to 24 branches of First Bank located in the greater Chicago, Illinois, area. Excluding the purchase accounting adjustments, the acquisition included the assumption of approximately $1.2 billion in deposits and the purchase of $301.2 million of loans and $23.0 million in real and personal property associated with the acquired branch locations. The Bank received cash of $832.5 million to assume the net liabilities. All of the loans in the acquired portfolio were performing and pass-grade credits. This acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805.
     Also, on February 19, 2010, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and liabilities of George Washington through a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC. The Illinois Department of financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, declared George Washington closed on February 19, 2010 and appointed the FDIC as receiver. Excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, the Bank acquired approximately $403.9 million in assets and assumed $395.7 million of deposits of George Washington.
     In connection with the George Washington acquisition, the Bank entered into a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC that collectively covers $327.1 million of assets including

46


Table of Contents

single family residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, and other real estate. The Bank acquired other George Washington assets that are not covered by the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC including investment securities purchased at fair market value and other tangible assets.
     See Note 2 (Business Combinations), in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the details of these transactions.
RESULTS OF OPERATION
Net Interest Income
     Net interest income, the Corporation’s principal source of earnings, is the difference between interest income generated by earning assets (primarily loans and investment securities) and interest paid on interest-bearing funds (namely customer deposits and wholesale borrowings). Net interest income is affected by market interest rates on both earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, the level of earning assets being funded by interest bearing liabilities, noninterest-bearing liabilities, the mix of funding between interest bearing liabilities, noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity, and the growth in earning assets.
     Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $90.4 million compared to $86.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. For the purpose of this remaining discussion, net interest income is presented on an FTE basis, to provide a comparison among all types of interest earning assets. That is, interest on tax-free securities and tax-exempt loans has been restated as if such interest were taxed at the statutory Federal income tax rate of 35%, adjusted for the non-deductible portion of interest expense incurred to acquire the tax-free assets. Net interest income presented on an FTE basis is a non-GAAP financial measure widely used by financial services organizations. The FTE adjustment was $2.0 million and $1.7 million for the quarters ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     FTE net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $92.3 million compared to $88.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
     As illustrated in the following rate/volume analysis table, interest income and interest expense both decreased due to the falling interest rate environment.

47


Table of Contents

                         
    Quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009  
RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS   Increases (Decreases)  
        (Dollars in thousands)   Volume     Rate     Total  
INTEREST INCOME — FTE
                       
Investment securities
  $ 1,565     $ (4,740 )   $ (3,175 )
Loans held for sale
    (112 )     (26 )     (138 )
Noncovered loans
    (4,198 )     (1,481 )     (5,679 )
Covered loans and loss share receivable
    1,761             1,761  
 
                 
Total interest income — FTE
  $ (984 )   $ (6,247 )   $ (7,231 )
 
                 
INTEREST EXPENSE
                       
Demand deposits-interest bearing
  $ 7     $ (10 )   $ (3 )
Savings and money market accounts
    2,195       29       2,224  
Certificates of deposits and other time deposits
    (4,579 )     (7,603 )     (12,182 )
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    12       116       128  
Wholesale borrowings
    (3,358 )     2,189       (1,169 )
 
                 
Total interest expense
  $ (5,723 )   $ (5,279 )   $ (11,002 )
 
                 
Net interest income — FTE
  $ 4,739     $ (968 )   $ 3,771  
 
                 
     The net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income FTE by average earning assets. As with net interest income, the net interest margin is affected by the level and mix of earning assets, the proportion of earning assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities, and the interest rate spread. In addition, the net interest margin is impacted by changes in federal income tax rates and regulations as they affect the tax-equivalent adjustment.
     The following table provides 2010 FTE net interest income and net interest margin totals as well as 2009 comparative amounts:
                 
    Quarters ended  
    March 31,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
Net interest income
  $ 90,394     $ 86,894  
Tax equivalent adjustment
    1,954       1,683  
 
           
Net interest income — FTE
  $ 92,348     $ 88,577  
 
           
 
               
Average earning assets
  $ 10,080,871     $ 10,189,233  
 
           
Net interest margin — FTE
    3.72 %     3.53 %
 
           
     Average loans outstanding (excluding covered loans) for the current year and prior year first quarters totaled $7.0 billion and $7.4 billion, respectively. Increases in average loan

48


Table of Contents

balances from first quarter 2009 to the first quarter 2010 occurred in commercial and home equity, while mortgage loans, installment loans, credit card loans, and leases declined.
     Specific changes in average loans outstanding, compared to the first quarter 2009, were as follows: commercial loans were down $139.4 million or 3.22%; home equity loans were up $20.1 million or 2.73%; mortgage loans were down $82.0 million or 15.28%; installment loans, both direct and indirect declined $155.8 million or 10.00%; credit card loans increased $3.8 million or 2.57%; and leases decreased $5.3 million or 8.06%. Average covered loans have been separately stated and are described in more detail in Note 2 (Business Combinations). The majority of fixed-rate mortgage loan originations are sold to investors through the secondary mortgage loan market. Average outstanding loans for the 2010 and 2009 first quarters equaled 70.91% and 72.44% of average earning assets, respectively.
     Average deposits were $8.3 billion during the 2010 first quarter, up $696.7 million, or 9.11%, from the same period last year. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, average core deposits (which are defined as checking accounts, savings accounts and money market savings products) increased $1.5 billion, or 29.28%, and represented 78.45% of total average deposits, compared to 66.21% for the 2009 first quarter. Average certificates of deposit (“CDs”) decreased $785.4 million, or 30.41%, compared to the prior year. Average wholesale borrowings decreased $443.4 million, and as a percentage of total interest-bearing funds equaled 9.02% for the 2010 first quarter and 14.45% for the same quarter one year ago. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased $10.8 million, and as a percentage of total interest bearing funds equaled 12.12% for the 2010 first quarter and 11.81% for the 2009 first quarter. Average interest-bearing liabilities funded 77.91% of average earning assets in the current year quarter and 78.21% during the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Other Income
     Excluding investment gains, other income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $53.9 million, a decrease of $1.2 million from the $55.2 million earned during the same period one year ago. Other income as a percentage of net revenue (FTE net interest income plus other income, less security gains from securities) was 36.88%, compared to 38.39% for the same quarter one year ago.
     Trust department income was $5.3 million, up 10.25% primarily due to advances in the equity markets. Service charges on deposits were $15.4 million, up 8.49% primarily attributable to an increase in new accounts. Credit card fees were $11.6 million, up 4.28% reflecting the slight improvement in the economy. Loan sales and servicing income was $3.2 million, an increase of $0.9 million, primarily attributable improved revenue from the mortgage servicing function. Bank owned life insurance income was $5.7 million, up 87.46% attributable to realized policy proceeds. A separate line item was added for the $5.1 million gain on the acquisition of George Washington, while also separately stated in the first quarter of 2009 was the $9.5 million adjustment due to the curtailment of the postretirement medical plan for active employees. Other operating income was $3.3 million, a decrease of $1.4 million over the first quarter of 2009.

49


Table of Contents

Other Expenses
     Other (non-interest) expenses totaled $94.0 million for the first quarter 2010 compared to $83.2 million for the same 2009 quarter, an increase of $10.8 million, or 12.99%.
     For the three months ended March 31, 2010, FDIC expense increased $1.2 million over the prior year quarter due to increased assessments enacted in April 2009. Increases in operating expenses compared to the first quarter of 2009 were primarily attributable to increased salary, occupancy and professional services related to the first quarter 2010 acquisitions. One time expenses associated with the data processing conversions of the acquisitions totaled $2.7 million.
     The efficiency ratio for the first quarter 2010 was 64.1%, compared to 57.81% during the same period in 2009. The “lower is better” efficiency ratio indicates the percentage of operating costs that are used to generate each dollar of net revenue — that is during 2009, 64.1 cents was spent to generate each $1 of net revenue. Net revenue is defined as net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, plus other income less gains from the sales of securities.
Federal Income Taxes
     Federal income tax expense was $6.8 million and $11.4 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective federal income tax rate for the first quarter 2010 was 27.39%, compared to 27.88% for the same quarter 2009. Tax reserves have been specifically estimated for potential at-risk items in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. Further federal income tax information is described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 11 (Federal Income Taxes) in the 2009 Form 10-K.

50


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Acquisitions
     On February 19, 2010, the Bank completed the acquisition of certain assets and the transfer of certain liabilities with respect to 24 branches of First Bank located in the greater Chicago, Illinois, area. The Bank acquired assets with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $1.2 billion, including $276.5 million of loans, and $41.9 million of premises and equipment, and assumed $1.2 billion of deposits. The Bank received cash of $832.5 million to assume the net liabilities. The Bank recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $3.2 million and goodwill of $48.3 million.
     On February 19, 2010, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the FDIC to acquire deposits, loans, and certain other liabilities and assets of George Washington in an FDIC-assisted transaction. The Bank acquired assets with a fair value of approximately $368.1 million, including $171.4 million of loans, $15.4 million of investment securities, $58.0 million of cash and due from banks, $11.5 million in other real estate, and $403.2 million in liabilities, including $400.7 million of deposits. The Bank recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $1.0 million and received a cash payment from the FDIC of approximately $40.2 million. The Bank entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC and recorded, at its acquisition date fair value, a loss share receivable of $107.6 million, which is classified as part of covered loans in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The transaction resulted in a gain on acquisition of $5.1 million, which is included in noninterest income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
     See Note 2 (Business Combinations), in the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the details of these transactions.
Investment Securities
     At March 31, 2010, the securities portfolio totaled $3.2 billion; $67.3 million of that amount was held-to-maturity securities and the remainder was securities available-for-sale. In comparison, as of March 31, 2009, the total portfolio was $2.6 billion, including $30.6 million of held-to-maturity securities and $2.6 billion of securities available-for-sale.
     Available-for-sale securities are held primarily for liquidity, interest rate risk management and long-term yield enhancement. Accordingly, the Corporation’s investment policy is to invest in securities with low credit risk, such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency obligations, state and political obligations and mortgage-backed securities. Held-to-maturity securities consist principally of securities issued by state and political subdivisions. Other investments include FHLB and FRB stock.
     Net unrealized gains were $62.0 million, $55.1 million and $25.5 million at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009, respectively. The improvement in the fair value of the investment securities is driven by government agency securities held in portfolio.
     The Corporation conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities to determine whether any securities are other-than-temporary impaired. Only the credit portion of OTTI is to

51


Table of Contents

be recognized in current earnings for those securities where there is no intent to sell or it is more likely than not the Corporation would not be required to sell the security prior to expected recovery. The remaining portion of OTTI is to be included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax.
     Gross unrealized losses of $19.3 million, compared to $21.6 million as of December 31, 2009, and $37.9 million at March 31, 2009 were concentrated within trust preferred securities held in the investment portfolio. The Corporation holds eight, single issuer, trust preferred securities. Such investments are less than 2% of the fair value of the entire investment portfolio. None of the bank issuers have deferred paying dividends on their issued trust preferred shares in which the Corporation is invested. The fair values of these investments have been impacted by market conditions which have caused risk premiums to increase markedly resulting in the decline in the fair value of the Corporation’s trust preferred securities. However, prices are recovering from their lows reflecting increased liquidity for these securities as well as an improvement in the credit profile of the issuers as improving.
     Further detail of the composition of the securities portfolio and discussion of the results of the most recent OTTI assessment are in Note 3 (Investment Securities) to the consolidated financial statements.
Loans
     Total loans outstanding at March 31, 2010 were $7.4 billion compared to $6.9 billion at December 31, 2009 and $7.3 billion at March 31, 2009.
                         
    As of     As of     As of  
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    2010     2009     2009  
            (In thousands)          
Commercial loans
  $ 4,389,859     $ 4,066,522     $ 4,344,915  
Mortgage loans
    447,575       463,416       524,909  
Installment loans
    1,382,522       1,425,373       1,533,885  
Home equity loans
    766,073       753,112       741,073  
Credit card loans
    145,029       153,525       141,597  
Leases
    59,464       61,541       64,384  
 
                 
Total noncovered loans
    7,190,522       6,923,489       7,350,763  
Covered Loans
    169,270              
Less allowance for loan losses
    117,806       115,092       106,257  
 
                 
Net loans
  $ 7,072,716     $ 6,808,397     $ 7,244,506  
 
                 
     Despite the slowdown of the manufacturing-based economy in Northeast Ohio, commercial loans increased 1.03% from the prior year first quarter. Single family mortgage loans continue to be originated by the Corporation’s mortgage subsidiary and then sold into the secondary mortgage market or held in portfolio.

52


Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
     The Corporation uses a vendor based loss migration model to forecast losses for commercial loans. The model creates loss estimates using twelve-month (monthly rolling) vintages and calculates cumulative three years loss rates within two different scenarios. One scenario uses five year historical performance data while the other one uses two year historical data. The calculated rate is the average cumulative expected loss of the two and five year data set. As a result, this approach lends more weight to the more recent performance and would be more conservative.
     The uncertain economic conditions in which we are currently operating have resulted in risks that differ from our historical loss experience. Accordingly, Management deemed it appropriate and prudent to apply qualitative factors (“q-factors”) and assign additional reserves. These q-factors are supported by judgments made by experienced credit risk management personnel and represent risk associated with the portfolio given the uncertainty and the inherent imprecision of estimating future losses.
     As required by current accounting guidance, the acquired loans from First Bank were recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition, with no carryover of related allowances. The determination of the fair value of the loans resulted in a write-down in the value of the loans, which was assigned to an accretable balance which will be recognized as interest income over the remaining term of the loans. The acquired loans from George Washington were also recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition, with no carryover of related allowances. The determination of the fair value of the loans resulted in a write-down in the value of the loans, which was assigned a nonaccretable and an accretable balance which will be recognized as interest income over the remaining term of the loans. Also in connection with the George Washington acquisition, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that collectively cover single family residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, and other real estate. (See Note 2 (Business Combinations) for additional information. Because acquired loans are required to be accounted for at fair value on the date of acquisition, Management believes that asset quality measures are generally more meaningful when acquired loans are excluded from such measures. Therefore, the asset quality ratios included herein exclude the acquired loans with a period end balance of $523.3 million. In addition, ratios of nonperforming loans exclude these acquired loans and other real estate, with a period end balance of $11.4 million, covered by the FDIC loss share agreements.
     At March 31, 2010 the allowance for loan losses was $117.8 million or 1.72% of loans outstanding, excluding acquired loans, compared to $115.1 million or 1.68% at year-end 2009 and $106.3 or 1.45% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. There were no allowances for loan losses related to the $523.3 million in acquired loans at March 31, 2010. The allowance equaled 105.14% of nonperforming loans at March 31, 2010, compared to 125.55% at year-end 2009, and 151.35% for March 31, 2009. During 2008 additional reserves were established to address identified risks associated with the slow down in the housing markets and the decline in residential and commercial real estate values. These reserves totaled $20.0 million, $19.8 million, and $20.1 at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2009, respectively. The increase in the additional allocation augmented the increase in the calculated loss migration analysis as the loans were downgraded during 2010. Nonperforming loans have increased by

53


Table of Contents

$41.8 million over March 31, 2009, and $20.4 over December 31, 2009 primarily attributable to the declining economic conditions.
     Net charge-offs were $22.8 million for the first quarter ended 2010 compared to $87.1 million for year-end 2009 and $15.6 million in the first quarter ended 2009. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs equaled 1.36%, 1.22%, and 0.86% for March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009, respectively. Losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses as soon as they are identified.
     The allowance for unfunded lending commitments at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009 was $6.3 million, $5.8 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The allowance for credit losses, which includes both the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, amounted to $124.1 million at first quarter-end 2010, $120.8 million at year-end 2009 and $112.3 million at first quarter-end 2009.
Allowance for Credit Losses
     The allowance for credit losses is the sum of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.

54


Table of Contents

                         
    Quarter ended     Year Ended     Quarter ended  
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
        (In thousands)   2010     2009     2009  
Allowance for Loan Losses                        
Allowance for loan losses-beginning of period
  $ 115,092     $ 103,757     $ 103,757  
Provision for loan losses
    25,493       98,433       18,065  
Net charge-offs
    (22,779 )     (87,098 )     (15,565 )
 
                 
Allowance for loan losses-end of period
  $ 117,806     $ 115,092     $ 106,257  
 
                 
 
                       
Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments
                       
 
                       
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 5,751     $ 6,588     $ 6,588  
Provision for credit losses
    586       (837 )     (569 )
 
                 
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,337     $ 5,751     $ 6,019  
 
                 
 
                       
Allowance for credit losses
  $ 124,143     $ 120,843     $ 112,276  
 
                 
 
                       
Annualized net charge-offs as a % of average loans
    1.36 %     1.22 %     0.86 %
 
                 
 
                       
Allowance for loan losses:
                       
As a percentage of period-end loans, excluding acquired loans (a)
    1.72 %     1.68 %     1.45 %
 
                 
As a percentage of nonperforming loans
    105.14 %     125.55 %     151.35 %
 
                 
As a multiple of annualized net charge offs
    1.28 x     1.32 x     1.68 x
 
                 
 
                       
Allowance for credit losses:
                       
As a percentage of period-end loans, excluding acquired loans (a)
    1.82 %     1.77 %     1.53 %
 
                 
As a percentage of nonperforming loans
    110.80 %     131.82 %     159.93 %
 
                 
As a multiple of annualized net charge offs
    1.34 x     1.39 x     1.78 x
 
                 
 
(a)   Excludes loss share receivable
     The allowance for credit losses increased $3.3 million from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010, and increased $11.9 million from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010. The increase for both periods was attributable to additional reserves that were established to address identified risks associated with the slow down in the housing markets and the decline in residential and commercial real estate values. The following tables show the overall trend in credit quality by specific asset and risk categories.

55


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    At March 31, 2010  
    Loan Type  
Allowance for Loan Losses Components:   Commercial     Commercial R/E             Installment     Home Equity     Credit Card     Res Mortgage        
       (In thousands)   Loans     Loans     Leases     Loans     Loans     Loans     Loans     Total  
Individually Impaired Loan Component:
                                                               
Loan balance
  $ 16,805     $ 68,777     $     $     $     $     $     $ 85,582  
Allowance
    2,185       8,419                                     10,604  
Collective Loan Impairment Components:
                                                               
Credit risk-graded loans
                                                               
Grade 1 loan balance
    105,207       1,156       7,269                                       113,632  
Grade 1 allowance
    72             6                                       78  
Grade 2 loan balance
    43,085       38,301       63                                       81,449  
Grade 2 allowance
    50       63                                             113  
Grade 3 loan balance
    352,421       498,233       16,247                                       866,901  
Grade 3 allowance
    791       1,350       45                                       2,186  
Grade 4 loan balance
    980,056       1,621,687       35,020                                       2,636,763  
Grade 4 allowance
    9,165       16,206       327                                       25,698  
Grade 5 (Special Mention) loan balance
    69,325       89,821       852                                       159,998  
Grade 5 allowance
    2,717       4,402       34                                       7,153  
Grade 6 (Substandard) loan balance
    79,893       97,606       13                                       177,512  
Grade 6 allowance
    9,051       13,354       2                                       22,407  
Grade 7 (Doubtful) loan balance
    197       267                                             464  
Grade 7 allowance
    5       147                                             152  
Consumer loans based on payment status:
                                                               
Current loan balances
                          1,357,785       741,203       139,718       416,263       2,654,969  
Current loans allowance
                          18,688       6,155       8,013       3,403       36,259  
30 days past due loan balance
                          12,765       1,932       1,705       11,037       27,439  
30 days past due allowance
                          2,031       582       917       475       4,005  
60 days past due loan balance
                          3,907       642       1,270       2,516       8,335  
60 days past due allowance
                          1,627       410       969       351       3,357  
90+ days past due loan balance
                          2,268       1,044       2,336       17,759       23,407  
90+ days past due allowance
                          1,526       1,049       2,259       960       5,794  
 
                                               
Total loans
  $ 1,646,989     $ 2,415,848     $ 59,464     $ 1,376,725     $ 744,821     $ 145,029     $ 447,575     $ 6,836,451  
 
                                               
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
  $ 24,036     $ 43,941     $ 414     $ 23,872     $ 8,196     $ 12,158     $ 5,189     $ 117,806  
 
                                               
     Note: Total loans excludes loans acquired from First Bank and George Washington which were recorded at date of acquisition at their fair value.

56


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    At December 31, 2009  
    Loan Type  
Allowance for Loan Losses Components:   Commercial     Commercial R/E             Installment     Home Equity     Credit Card     Res Mortgage        
       (In thousands)   Loans     Loans     Leases     Loans     Loans     Loans     Loans     Total  
Individually Impaired Loan Component:
                                                               
Loan balance
  $ 17,480     $ 50,345     $     $     $     $     $     $ 67,825  
Allowance
    3,678       6,849                                     10,527  
Collective Loan Impairment Components:
                                                               
Credit risk-graded loans
                                                               
Grade 1 loan balance
    75,598       1,178       7,441                                       84,217  
Grade 1 allowance
    47             6                                       53  
Grade 2 loan balance
    59,946       74,839       67                                       134,852  
Grade 2 allowance
    52       88                                             140  
Grade 3 loan balance
    316,535       517,338       15,246                                       849,119  
Grade 3 allowance
    579       1,137       36                                       1,752  
Grade 4 loan balance
    1,030,872       1,647,918       38,179                                       2,716,969  
Grade 4 allowance
    8,666       16,306       257                                       25,229  
Grade 5 (Special Mention) loan balance
    42,066       40,748       30                                       82,844  
Grade 5 allowance
    1,224       1,873       1                                       3,098  
Grade 6 (Substandard) loan balance
    83,884       107,635       578                                       192,097  
Grade 6 allowance
    7,616       12,558       53                                       20,227  
Grade 7 (Doubtful) loan balance
    68       72                                             140  
Grade 7 allowance
    1       3                                             4  
Consumer loans based on payment status:
                                                               
Current loan balances
                            1,396,198       748,207       146,906       428,150       2,719,461  
Current loans allowance
                            18,038       5,829       8,106       3,304       35,277  
30 days past due loan balance
                            18,057       2,306       2,245       13,515       36,123  
30 days past due allowance
                            2,813       677       1,178       571       5,239  
60 days past due loan balance
                            5,919       1,678       1,622       4,301       13,520  
60 days past due allowance
                            2,461       1,081       1,217       617       5,376  
90+ days past due loan balance
                            5,199       921       2,752       17,450       26,322  
90+ days past due allowance
                            3,458       912       2,618       1,182       8,170  
 
                                               
Total loans
  $ 1,626,449     $ 2,440,073     $ 61,541     $ 1,425,373     $ 753,112     $ 153,525     $ 463,416     $ 6,923,489  
 
                                               
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
  $ 21,863     $ 38,814     $ 353     $ 26,770     $ 8,499     $ 13,119     $ 5,674     $ 115,092  
 
                                               

57


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    At March 31, 2009  
    Loan Type  
Allowance for Loan Losses Components:   Commercial     Commercial R/E             Installment     Home Equity     Credit Card     Res Mortgage        
       (In thousands)   Loans     Loans     Leases     Loans     Loans     Loans     Loans     Total  
Individually Impaired Loan Component:
                                                               
Loan balance
  $ 11,861     $ 52,038     $     $     $     $     $     $ 63,899  
Allowance
    4,567       5,421                                     9,988  
Collective Loan Impairment Components:
                                                               
Credit risk-graded loans
                                                               
Grade 1 loan balance
    31,584       5,967       6,058                                       43,609  
Grade 1 allowance
    30       11       7                                       48  
Grade 2 loan balance
    194,607       129,771       2,593                                       326,971  
Grade 2 allowance
    472       618       8                                       1,098  
Grade 3 loan balance
    507,255       538,629       19,315                                       1,065,199  
Grade 3 allowance
    1,377       4,010       65                                       5,452  
Grade 4 loan balance
    1,035,542       1,617,994       34,410                                       2,687,946  
Grade 4 allowance
    7,862       27,282       275                                       35,419  
Grade 5 (Special Mention) loan balance
    33,989       40,545       157                                       74,691  
Grade 5 allowance
    889       1,901       4                                       2,794  
Grade 6 (Substandard) loan balance
    67,205       77,836       1,851                                       146,892  
Grade 6 allowance
    5,013       9,175       127                                       14,315  
Grade 7 (Doubtful) loan balance
    33       59                                             92  
Grade 7 allowance
    3       5                                             8  
Consumer loans based on payment status:
                                                               
Current loan balances
                            1,511,155       737,797       135,627       494,140       2,878,719  
Current loans allowance
                            12,557       5,040       3,269       2,722       23,588  
30 days past due loan balance
                            13,897       1,930       1,780       11,502       29,109  
30 days past due allowance
                            1,733       575       708       421       3,437  
60 days past due loan balance
                            5,205       766       1,547       4,074       11,592  
60 days past due allowance
                            1,950       531       952       501       3,934  
90+ days past due loan balance
                            3,628       580       2,643       15,193       22,044  
90+ days past due allowance
                            2,320       659       2,169       1,028       6,176  
 
                                               
Total loans
  $ 1,882,076     $ 2,462,839     $ 64,384     $ 1,533,885     $ 741,073     $ 141,597     $ 524,909     $ 7,350,763  
 
                                               
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
  $ 20,213     $ 48,423     $ 486     $ 18,560     $ 6,805     $ 7,098     $ 4,672     $ 106,257  
 
                                               
Asset Quality
     Making a loan to earn an interest spread inherently includes taking the risk of not being repaid. Successful management of credit risk requires making good underwriting decisions, carefully administering the loan portfolio and diligently collecting delinquent accounts.
     The Corporation’s Credit Policy Division manages credit risk by establishing common credit policies for its subsidiaries, participating in approval of their largest loans, conducting reviews of their loan portfolios, providing them with centralized consumer underwriting, collections and loan operations services, and overseeing their loan workouts. Notes 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and 4 (Loans Allowance for Loan Losses) in the 2009 Form 10-K provide detailed information regarding the Corporation’s credit policies and practices.
     The Corporation’s objective is to minimize losses from its commercial lending activities and to maintain consumer losses at acceptable levels that are stable and consistent with growth and profitability objectives.

58


Table of Contents

Nonperforming Loans are defined as follows:
  Nonaccrual loans on which interest is no longer accrued because its collection is doubtful.
  Restructured loans on which, due to deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition, the original terms have been modified in favor of the borrower or either principal or interest has been forgiven.
Nonperforming Assets are defined as follows:
  Nonaccrual loans on which interest is no longer accrued because its collection is doubtful.
  Restructured loans on which, due to deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition, the original terms have been modified in favor of the borrower or either principal or interest has been forgiven.
  Other real estate (ORE) acquired through foreclosure in satisfaction of a loan.
                         
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    2010     2009     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Nonperforming commercial loans
  $ 94,798     $ 74,033     $ 54,070  
Other nonaccrual loans:
    17,245       17,639       16,134  
 
                 
Total nonperforming loans
    112,043       91,672       70,204  
Other real estate (“ORE”)
    11,277       9,329       6,039  
 
                 
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 123,320     $ 101,001     $ 76,243  
 
                 
 
                       
Loans past due 90 day or more accruing interest
  $ 21,099     $ 35,025     $ 18,602  
 
                 
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and ORE
    1.80 %     1.48 %     1.04 %
 
                 
     During 2009 and the first quarter 2010 the economic conditions in our markets continued to be challenging. Residential developers and homebuilders have been the most adversely affected, with the significant decrease of buyer resulting from a combination of the restriction of available credit and economic pressure impacting the consumer. Consumers continue to be under pressure due to high debt levels, limited refinance opportunities, increased cost of living and increasing unemployment. These conditions have resulted in increases in bankruptcies as well as charge offs. Commercial nonperforming loans increased/decreased $20.8 million from December 31, 2009 and $40.7 million from March 31, 2009. Criticized loans increased $80.7 million from December 31, 2009, and $138.0 from March 31, 2009.
     In nonperforming assets, other real estate includes $1.0 million of vacant land no longer considered for branch expansion which is not related to loan portfolios.

59


Table of Contents

     See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the 2009 Form 10-K for a summary of the Corporation’s nonaccrual and charge-off policies.
     The following table is a nonaccrual commercial loan flow analysis:
                                         
    Quarter Ended  
    March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    2010     2009     2009     2009     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Nonaccrual commercial loans beginning of period
  $ 74,033     $ 63,357     $ 48,563     $ 54,070     $ 40,195  
 
                                       
Credit Actions:
                                       
New
    31,211       34,612       24,491       7,259       22,912  
Loan and lease losses
    (5,367 )     (5,272 )     (3,886 )     (5,951 )     (1,950 )
Charged down
    (3,567 )     (12,710 )     (3,321 )     (4,182 )     (2,603 )
Return to accruing status
    (672 )     (478 )     (24 )     (660 )     (3,333 )
Payments
    (840 )     (5,476 )     (2,466 )     (1,973 )     (1,151 )
Sales
                             
 
                             
Nonaccrual commercial loans end of period
  $ 94,798     $ 74,033     $ 63,357     $ 48,563     $ 54,070  
 
                             
Deposits, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Wholesale Borrowings
     The following ratios and table provide additional information about the change in the mix of customer deposits.
                                                 
    Quarter Ended     Year Ended     Quarter Ended  
    March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     March 31, 2009  
    Average     Average     Average     Average     Average     Average  
    Balance     Rate     Balance     Rate     Balance     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Non-interest DDA
  $ 2,146,969           $ 1,910,171           $ 1,767,885        
Interest-bearing DDA
    687,233       0.09 %     656,367       0.09 %     655,279       0.10 %
Savings and money market
    3,709,246       0.83 %     2,886,842       0.81 %     2,638,166       0.83 %
CDs and other time deposits
    1,797,348       1.45 %     2,056,208       2.66 %     2,582,788       2.92 %
 
                                         
Total customer deposits
    8,340,796       0.69 %     7,509,588       1.05 %     7,644,118       1.28 %
 
                                               
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    951,927       0.48 %     1,013,167       0.47 %     941,112       0.43 %
Wholesale borrowings
    708,414       3.53 %     952,979       2.87 %     1,151,777       2.59 %
 
                                         
Total funds
  $ 10,001,137             $ 9,475,734             $ 9,737,007          
 
                                         

60


Table of Contents

     Total average demand deposits comprised 33.98% of average deposits in the 2010 first quarter compared to 31.70% in the first quarter 2009. Savings accounts, including money market products, made up 44.46% of average deposits in the 2010 first quarter compared to 34.51% in the first quarter 2009. CDs made up 21.55% of average deposits in the first quarter 2010 and 33.79% in the first quarter 2009.
     Deposits balances were elevated by the $395.7 million in deposits assumed as part of the George Washington transaction, and by $1.2 billion in deposits assumed on February 19, 2010 from First Bank. The Corporation received approximately $40.2 million from the FDIC associated with the George Washington transaction and believes that this provides sufficient liquidity to fund the potential at-risk deposit outflows.
     The average cost of deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and wholesale borrowings was down 119 basis points compared to one year ago, or 2.15% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
     The following table summarizes CDs of $100 thousand or more (“Jumbo CDs”) as of March 31, 2010, by time remaining until maturity:
         
Time until maturity:   Amount  
    (In thousands)  
Under 3 months
  $ 175,013  
3 to 6 months
    142,376  
6 to 12 months
    240,349  
Over 1 year through 3 years
    103,904  
Over 3 years
    32,125  
 
     
 
  $ 693,767  
 
     
Capital Resources
     The capital management objectives of the Corporation are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in the Corporation’s businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to assure ready access to the capital markets.
Shareholder’s Equity
     Shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2010 totaled $1.2 billion compared to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009 and $1.1 billion at March 31, 2009. The cash dividend of $0.16 per share paid in the first quarter has an indicated annual rate of $0.64 per share.
Capital Availability
     On March 3, 2010, the Corporation entered into two distribution agency agreements with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (collectively, the “Sales Agents”), pursuant to which the Corporation may, from time to time, offer and sell shares

61


Table of Contents

of the Corporation’s common stock. Sales of the common stock are made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the Nasdaq Global Select Market at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed with the Sales Agents. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation sold 3.9 million shares with an average value of $20.91 per share.
Capital Adequacy
     Capital adequacy is an important indicator of financial stability and performance. The Corporation maintained a strong capital position as tangible common equity to assets was 7.93% at March 31, 2010, compared to 8.89% at December 31, 2009, and 7.60% at March 31, 2009.
     Financial institutions are subject to a strict uniform system of capital-based regulations. Under this system, there are five different categories of capitalization, with “prompt corrective actions” and significant operational restrictions imposed on institutions that are capital deficient under the categories. The five categories are: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
     To be considered well capitalized, an institution must have a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%, a Tier I capital ratio of at least 6%, a leverage capital ratio of at least 5%, and must not be subject to any order or directive requiring the institution to improve its capital level. An adequately capitalized institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%, a Tier I capital ratio of at least 4% and a leverage capital ratio of at least 4%. Institutions with lower capital levels are deemed to be undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized, depending on their actual capital levels. The appropriate federal regulatory agency may also downgrade an institution to the next lower capital category upon a determination that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound practice. Institutions are required to monitor closely their capital levels and to notify their appropriate regulatory agency of any basis for a change in capital category.
     The George Washington FDIC-assisted transaction, which was accounted for as a business combination, resulted in the recognition of an FDIC indemnification asset, which represents the fair value of estimated future payments by the FDIC to the Corporation for losses on covered assets. The FDIC indemnification asset, as well as covered assets, are risk-weighted at 20% for regulatory capital requirement purposes.
     As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, as well as FirstMerit Bank, exceeded the minimum capital levels of the well capitalized category.

62


Table of Contents

                                                 
    March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
    2010   2009   2009
             (Dollars in thousands)        
Consolidated
                                               
Total equity
  $ 1,155,353       9.38 %   $ 1,065,627       10.11 %   $ 1,084,269       9.88 %
Common equity
    1,155,353       9.38 %     1,065,627       10.11 %     963,647       8.78 %
Tangible common equity (a)
    961,749       7.93 %     924,871       8.89 %     823,086       7.60 %
Tier 1 capital (b)
    1,002,610       11.75 %     971,013       12.09 %     1,001,901       11.86 %
Total risk-based capital (c)
    1,109,453       13.01 %     1,071,682       13.34 %     1,107,571       13.11 %
Leverage (d)
    1,002,610       9.03 %     971,013       9.39 %     1,001,901       9.13 %
 
                                               
Bank Only
                                               
Total equity
  $ 974,433       7.92 %   $ 946,626       9.00 %   $ 792,085       7.23 %
Common equity
    974,433       7.92 %     946,626       9.00 %     792,085       7.23 %
Tangible common equity (a)
    829,529       6.82 %     806,223       7.77 %     651,524       6.02 %
Tier 1 capital (b)
    796,182       9.35 %     826,517       10.31 %     794,697       9.43 %
Total risk-based capital (c)
    898,734       10.56 %     922,919       11.51 %     896,531       10.64 %
Leverage (d)
    796,182       7.09 %     826,517       8.00 %     794,697       7.26 %
 
(a)   Common equity less all intangibles; computed as a ratio to total assets less intangible assets.
 
(b)   Shareholders’ equity less goodwill; computed as a ratio to risk-adjusted assets, as defined in the 1992 risk-based capital guidelines.
 
(c)   Tier 1 capital plus qualifying loan loss allowance, computed as a ratio to risk-adjusted assets, as defined in the 1992 risk-based capital guidelines.
 
(d)   Tier 1 capital computed as a ratio to the latest quarter’s average assets less goodwill.
Market Risk Management
     Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices, including the correlation among these factors and their volatility. When the value of an instrument is tied to such external factors, the holder faces “market risk.” The Corporation is primarily exposed to interest rate risk as a result of offering a wide array of financial products to its customers.
Interest rate risk management
     Changes in market interest rates may result in changes in the fair market value of the Corporation’s financial instruments, cash flows, and net interest income. The Corporation seeks to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and capital while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. The Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) oversees market risk management, establishing risk measures, limits, and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. According to

63


Table of Contents

these policies, responsibility for measuring and the management of interest rate risk resides in the Corporate Treasury function.
     Interest rate risk on the Corporation’s balance sheets consists of reprice, option, and basis risks. Reprice risk results from differences in the maturity, or repricing, of asset and liability portfolios. Option risk arises from “embedded options” present in the investment portfolio and in many financial instruments such as loan prepayment options, deposit early withdrawal options, and interest rate options. These options allow customers opportunities to benefit when market interest rates change, which typically results in higher costs or lower revenue for the Corporation. Basis risk refers to the potential for changes in the underlying relationship between market rates or indices, which subsequently result in a narrowing of profit spread on an earning asset or liability. Basis risk is also present in administered rate liabilities, such as interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts where historical pricing relationships to market rates may change due to the level or directional change in market interest rates. Each of these types of risks is defined in the discussion of market risk management of the 2009 Form 10-K.
     The interest rate risk position is measured and monitored using risk management tools, including earnings simulation modeling and economic value of equity sensitivity analysis, which capture both near term and long-term interest rate risk exposures. Combining the results from these separate risk measurement processes allows a reasonably comprehensive view of short-term and long-term interest rate risk in the Corporation.
     Net interest income simulation analysis. Earnings simulation involves forecasting net interest earnings under a variety of scenarios including changes in the level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, and spreads between market interest rates. The sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates is measured using numerous interest rate scenarios including shocks, gradual ramps, curve flattening, curve steepening as well as forecasts of likely interest rates scenarios. Presented below is the Corporation’s interest rate risk profile as of March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                                 
    Immediate Change in Rates and Resulting Percentage
Increase/(Decrease) in Net Interest Income:
    - 100 basis   + 100 basis   + 200 basis   + 300 basis
    points   points   points   points
March 31, 2010
    *       1.99 %     3.41 %     4.22 %
March 31, 2009
    *       2.43 %     4.25 %     5.36 %
 
*   Modeling for the decrease in 100 basis points scenario has been suspended due to the current rate environment.
     Modeling the sensitivity of net interest earnings to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on numerous assumptions incorporated into the modeling process. To the extent that actual performance is different than what was assumed, actual net interest earnings sensitivity may be different than projected. The assumptions used in the models are Management’s best estimate based on studies conducted by the ALCO department. The ALCO department uses a data-warehouse to study interest rate risk at a transactional level and uses

64


Table of Contents

various ad-hoc reports to refine assumptions continuously. Assumptions and methodologies regarding administered rate liabilities (e.g., savings, money market and interest-bearing checking accounts), balance trends, and repricing relationships reflect Management’s best estimate of expected behavior and these assumptions are reviewed regularly.
     Economic value of equity modeling. The Corporation also has longer-term interest rate risk exposure, which may not be appropriately measured by earnings sensitivity analysis. ALCO uses economic value of equity (“EVE”) sensitivity analysis to study the impact of long-term cash flows on earnings and capital. EVE involves discounting present values of all cash flows of on balance sheet and off balance sheet items under different interest rate scenarios. The discounted present value of all cash flows represents the Corporation’s economic value of equity. The analysis requires modifying the expected cash flows in each interest rate scenario, which will impact the discounted present value. The amount of base-case measurement and its sensitivity to shifts in the yield curve allow management to measure longer-term repricing and option risk in the balance sheet. Presented below is the Corporation’s EVE profile as of March 31, 2010 and 2009:
                                 
    Immediate Change in Rates and Resulting Percentage
Increase/(Decrease) in EVE:
    - 100 basis   + 100 basis   + 200 basis   + 300 basis
    points   points   points   points
March 31, 2010
    *       2.82 %     3.09 %     2.27 %
March 31, 2009
    *       2.95 %     5.13 %     2.40 %
 
*   Modeling for the decrease in 100 basis points scenario has been suspended due to the current rate environment.
     Management of interest rate exposure. Management uses the results of its various simulation analyses to formulate strategies to achieve a desired risk profile within the parameters of the Corporation’s capital and liquidity guidelines. Specifically, Management actively manages interest rate risk positions by using derivatives predominately in the form of interest rate swaps, which modify the interest rate characteristics of certain assets and liabilities. For more information about how the Corporation uses interest rate swaps to manage its balance sheet, see Note 8 (Derivatives and Hedging Activities) to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Liquidity Risk Management
     Liquidity risk is the possibility of the Corporation being unable to meet current and future financial obligations in a timely manner. Liquidity is managed to ensure stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of funds to satisfy demand for credit, deposit withdrawals and investment opportunities. The Corporation considers core earnings, strong capital ratios and credit quality essential for maintaining high credit ratings, which allow the Corporation cost-effective access to market-based liquidity. The Corporation relies on a large, stable core deposit base and a diversified base of wholesale funding sources to manage liquidity risk.

65


Table of Contents

     The Treasury Group is responsible for identifying, measuring and monitoring the Corporation’s liquidity profile. The position is evaluated daily, weekly and monthly by analyzing the composition of all funding sources, reviewing projected liquidity commitments by future month and identifying sources and uses of funds. The Treasury Group also prepares a contingency funding plan that details the potential erosion of funds in the event of a systemic financial market crisis or institutional-specific stress. In addition, the overall management of the Corporation’s liquidity position is integrated into retail deposit pricing policies to ensure a stable core deposit base.
     The Corporation’s primary source of liquidity is its core deposit base, raised through its retail branch system. Core deposits comprised approximately 78.45% of total deposits at March 31, 2010. The Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, FirstMerit Bank, N.A., received approximately $40.2 million from the FDIC associated with the FDIC-assisted transaction involving George Washington. The Corporation believes these funds along with its other sources of liquidity provides sufficient liquidity to fund potential at-risk deposit outflows from this institution.
     The Corporation also has available unused wholesale sources of liquidity, including advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati, issuance through dealers in the capital markets and access to certificates of deposit issued through brokers. Liquidity is further provided by unencumbered, or unpledged, investment securities that totaled $1.2 million at March 31, 2010.
     The Corporation’s liquidity could be adversely affected by both direct and indirect circumstances. An example of a direct event would be a downgrade in the Corporation’s public credit rating by a rating agency due to factors such as deterioration in asset quality, a large charge to earnings, a decline in profitability or other financial measures, or a significant merger or acquisition. Examples of indirect events unrelated to the Corporation that could have an effect on its access to liquidity would be terrorism or war, natural disasters, political events, or the default or bankruptcy of a major corporation, mutual fund or hedge fund. Similarly, market speculation or rumors about the Corporation or the banking industry in general may adversely affect the cost and availability of normal funding sources.
     Certain credit markets that the Corporation participates in (from time to time), as sources of funding have been significantly disrupted and highly volatile since July 2007. As a means of maintaining adequate liquidity, the Corporation, like many other financial institutions, has relied more heavily on the liquidity and stability present in the short-term and secured credit markets since access to unsecured term debt has been restricted. Short-term funding has been available and cost effective. However, if further market disruption were to also reduce the cost effectiveness and availability of these funds for a prolonged period of time, management may need to secure other funding alternatives.
     The Corporation maintains a liquidity contingency plan that outlines the process for addressing a liquidity crisis. The plan provides for an evaluation of funding sources under various market conditions. It also assigns specific roles and responsibilities for effectively managing liquidity through a problem period.

66


Table of Contents

     Funding Trends for the Quarter — During the three months ended March 31, 2010, lower cost core deposits increased by $852.4 million from the previous quarter. In aggregate, deposits increased $1.9 billion. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $100.0 million from December 31, 2009. Wholesale borrowings decreased $62.4 million from the end of 2009 to March 31, 2010. The Corporation’s loan to deposit ratio decreased to 78.55% at March 31, 2010 from 92.14% at December 31, 2009.
     Parent Company Liquidity - The Corporation manages its liquidity principally through dividends from the bank subsidiary. The parent company has sufficient liquidity to service its debt; support customary corporate operations and activities (including acquisitions) at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences; as well as pay dividends to shareholders.
     During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, FirstMerit Bank did not pay dividends to FirstMerit Corporation. As of March 31, 2010, FirstMerit Bank had an additional $93.1 million available to pay dividends without regulatory approval.
     Recent Market and Regulatory Developments. Recent market conditions have made it difficult or uneconomical to access the capital markets. As a result, the United States Congress, the Treasury, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) have announced various programs designed to enhance market liquidity and bank capital.
     In response to the ongoing financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets, EESA was signed into law on October 3, 2008 and established TARP. As part of TARP, the Treasury established the CPP to provide up to $700 billion of funding to eligible financial institutions through the purchase of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities, capital stock and other financial instruments for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), more commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery package, was signed into law on February 17, 2009, by President Obama. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future TARP recipients until the institution has repaid the Treasury. On January 9, 2009, the Corporation completed the sale to the Treasury of $125.0 million of newly issued FirstMerit non-voting preferred shares as part of the CPP and a warrant to purchase 952,260 FirstMerit common shares at an exercise price of $19.69 per share. On April 22, 2009, the Corporation completed the repurchase of all 125,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A for $126.2 million which included all accrued and unpaid dividends as well as the unamortized discount on the preferred stock. On May 27, 2009 the Corporation completed the repurchase of the warrant held by the Treasury. The Corporation paid $5.0 million to the Treasury to repurchase the warrant.
     Separately, the FDIC announced its temporary liquidity guarantee program (“TLPG”) pursuant to which the FDIC will guarantee the payment of certain newly-issued senior unsecured debt of insured depository institutions (“Debt Guarantee”) and funds held at FDIC-insured depository institutions in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts in excess of the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount of $250,000 (“Transaction Account Guarantee”). Both guarantees were provided to eligible institutions, including the Corporation, at no cost

67


Table of Contents

through December 5, 2008. Participation in the TLPG subsequent to December 5, 2008 was optional. The Corporation elected to participate in the TLPG subsequent to December 5, 2008.
     The Transaction Account Guarantee is effective for the Corporation through June 30, 2010. Under the Debt Guarantee, qualifying senior unsecured debt newly issued by the Corporation during the period from October 14, 2008 to June 30, 2009, inclusive, is covered by the FDIC guarantee. The maximum amount of debt that eligible institutions can issue under the guarantee is 125% of the par value of the entity’s qualifying senior unsecured debt, excluding debt to affiliates that was outstanding as of September 30, 2008, and scheduled to mature by June 30, 2009. The FDIC will provide guarantee coverage until the earlier of the eligible debt’s maturity or June 30, 2012.
     Participants in the Debt Guarantee Program are assessed an annualized fee of 75 basis points for its participation, and an annualized fee of 10 basis points for its participation in the Transaction Account Guarantee. To the extent that these initial assessments are insufficient to cover the expense or losses arising under TLPG, the FDIC is required to impose an emergency special assessment on all FDIC insured depository institutions as prescribed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. In May 2009, the FDIC announced it was imposing an emergency special assessment of five basis points on average assets of all FDIC-insured depository institutions as of June 30, 2009. On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The prepaid assessments for these periods were collected on December 30, 2009, along with the regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. For the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, the prepaid assessment rate was based on each institution’s total basis point assessment in effect on September 30, 2009, adjusted to assume a 5% annualized deposit growth rate; for the 2011 and 2012 periods the computation is adjusted by an additional three basis points increase in the assessment rate. The three-year prepayment for the Corporation totaled $43.9 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
     The Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the financial services industry in which it operates. All accounting policies are important, and all policies described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the 2009 Form 10-K provide a greater understanding of how the Corporation’s financial performance is recorded and reported.
     Some accounting policies are more likely than others to have a significant effect on the Corporation’s financial results and to expose those results to potentially greater volatility. The policies require Management to exercise judgment and make certain assumptions and estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. These assumptions and estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.
     Management relies heavily on the use of judgment, assumptions and estimates to make a number of core decisions, including accounting for the allowance for loan losses, income taxes, derivative instruments and hedging activities, and assets and liabilities that involve valuation methodologies. A brief discussion of each of these areas appears within Management’s

68


Table of Contents

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2009 Form 10-K.
     Purchased loans and related indemnification assets. In accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance, all purchased loans and related indemnification assets are recorded at fair value at date of purchase. The initial valuation of these loans and related indemnification asset requires Management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates about how the acquired loans will perform in the future using valuation methods including discounted cash flow analysis and independent third-party appraisals. Factors that may significantly affect the initial valuation include, among others, market-based and industry data related to expected changes in interest rates, assumptions related to probability and severity of credit losses, estimated timing of credit losses including those the foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, expected prepayment rates, required or anticipated loan modifications, unfunded loan commitments, the specific terms and provisions of any loss share agreements, and specific industry and market conditions that may impact discount rates and independent third-party appraisals.
     On an ongoing basis, the accounting for purchased loans and related indemnification assets follows applicable authoritative accounting guidance for purchased non-impaired loans and purchased impaired loans. The amount that the Corporation realizes on these loans and related indemnification assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. The Corporation’s losses on these assets may be mitigated to the extent covered under the specific terms and provisions of any loss share agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     A detailed discussion of the Corporation’s off-balance sheet arrangements, including interest rate swaps, forward sale contracts, IRLCs, and TBA Securities is included in Note 8 (Derivatives and Hedging Activities) to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements included in this report and in Note 17 to the 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes since December 31, 2009.
Forward-looking Safe-harbor Statement
     Discussions in this report that are not statements of historical fact (including statements that include terms such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” intend,” and “plan”) are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and actual future results could differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties detained from time to time in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the 2009 Form 10-K.
     Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond a company’s control, and many of

69


Table of Contents

which, with respect to future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change. Examples of uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors, general and local economic and business conditions; recession or other economic downturns, expectations of and actual timing and amount of interest rate movements, including the slope of the yield curve (which can have a significant impact on a financial services institution); market and monetary fluctuations; inflation or deflation; customer and investor responses to these conditions; the financial condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the financial services industry; geopolitical developments including possible terrorist activity; recent and future legislative and regulatory developments; natural disasters; effectiveness of the Corporation’s hedging practices; technology; demand for the Corporation’s product offerings; new products and services in the industries in which the Corporation operates; and critical accounting estimates. Other factors are those inherent in originating, selling and servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in customer profiles. Additionally, the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), and other regulators; regulatory and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to the Corporation; and the Corporation’s success in executing its business plans and strategies and managing the risks involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ.
     Other factors not currently anticipated may also materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position. There can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations. While the Corporation believes that the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable, the reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date made. The Corporation does not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any obligation to update or alter any statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     See Market Risk Section in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     Management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has made an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.
     During the period covered by the report, there was no change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

70


Table of Contents

     Based upon the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     In the normal course of business, the Corporation is at all times subject to pending and threatened legal actions, some for which the relief or damages sought are substantial. Although the Corporation is not able to predict the outcome of such actions, after reviewing pending and threatened actions with counsel, Management believes that the outcome of any or all such actions will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or shareholders’ equity of the Corporation.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
     There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in 2009 Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a)   Not applicable.
(b)   Not applicable.
(a)   The following table provides information with respect to purchases the Corporation made of its common shares during the first quarter of the 2010 fiscal year:
                                 
                    Total Number of     Maximum  
                    Shares Purchased     Number of Shares  
                    as Part of Publicly     that May Yet Be  
    Total Number of     Average Price     Announced Plans     Purchased Under  
    Shares Purchased (2)     Paid per Share     or Programs (1)     Plans or Programs  
Balance as of December 31, 2009
                            396,272  
 
                               
January 1, 2010 - January 31, 2010
    38,762     $ 22.09             396,272  
February 1, 2010 - February 28, 2010
    64,017       21.05             396,272  
March 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010
    12,698       24.16             396,272  
 
                               
 
                       
Balance as of March 31, 2010:
    115,477     $ 21.73             396,272  
 
                       
 
(1)   On January 19, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3 million shares (the “New Repurchase Plan”). The New Repurchase Plan, which has no expiration

71


Table of Contents

    date, superseded all other repurchase programs, including that authorized by the Board of Directors on July 15, 2004 (the “Prior Repurchase Plan”). The Corporation had purchased all of the shares it was authorized to acquire under the Prior Repurchase Plan.
 
(2)   Reflects 115,477 common shares purchased as a result of either: (1) delivered by the option holder with respect to the exercise of stock options; (2) in the case of restricted shares of common stock, shares were withheld to pay income taxes or other tax liabilities with respect to the vesting of restricted shares; or (3) shares were returned upon the resignation of the restricted shareholder.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Corporation held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2010, for which the Board of Directors solicited proxies.
(1) Directors were elected at the Annual Meeting for terms expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with the following voting results:
                                 
                    Authority   Broker
    For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
Steven H. Baer
    64,394,273       *       6,103,010       8,410,770  
Karen S. Belden
    63,948,707       *       6,548,576       8,410,770  
R. Cary Blair
    63,259,864       *       7,237,420       8,410,770  
John C. Blickle
    64,023,421       *       6,473,862       8,410,769  
Robert W. Briggs
    64,091,003       *       6,406,281       8,410,770  
Richard Colella
    63,945,635       *       6,551,649       8,410,769  
Gina D. France
    64,408,180       *       6,089,104       8,410,769  
Paul G. Greig
    63,477,462       *       7,019,821       8,410,770  
Terry L. Haines
    63,341,507       *       7,155,777       8,410,769  
J. Michael Hohhschwender
    63,665,329       *       6,831,955       8,410,769  
Clifford J. Isroff
    63,093,621       *       7,403,663       8,410,769  
Philip A. Lloyd II
    62,142,643       *       8,354,640       8,410,770  
 
*   Proxies provide that shareholders may either cast a vote for, or abstain from voting for, directors.
In addition to the election of Directors, the following matters were voted on at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

72


Table of Contents

(2) Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010:
                             
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  76,673,409       1,738,647       495,991        
(3) Approval of amendments to Article FOURTH and Annex A of FirstMerit Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation which contain the express terms and standard provision of the Corporation’s previously issued shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A:
 
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  76,896,616       1,129,944       881,479       15  
(4) Approval of the amendments to Article III, Section 2 of FirstMerit Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to establish the number of directors within a range from nine to fifteen without shareholder approval and to establish the current number of directors at twelve:
 
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  70,881,457       7,135,137       891,445       15  
(5) Approval of the amendments to Article SEVENTH of FirstMerit Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to include a provision that would allow shareholders to approve, by a majority of the voting poser of the company, any matter that otherwise could require the approval of two-thirds or any other proportion (but not less than all) of the voting poser of the Corporation under Ohio law, and to eliminate the need to obtain shareholder approval for certain smaller business combinations and mergers:
 
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  70,853,923       6,985,958       1,068,152       20  
(6) Approval of the amendments to Article EIGHTH of FirstMerit Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to include a provision that would allow shareholders to approve all amendments to the Articles by a majority of the voting power of the Corporation:
 
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  75,893,990       2,038,591       975,454       19  

73


Table of Contents

(7) Approval of the amendments to Article III, Section 4 of FirstMerit Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated Code of Regulations to eliminate the provision requiring good cause for shareholders to remove a director during the term of office for which the director was elected:
                             
                Authority   Broker
For   Against   Withheld   Non-Votes
  76,388,240       1,604,132       915,668       13  
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.

74


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
         
Exhibit    
Number   Description
       
 
  2.1    
Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank All Deposits, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of George Washington Savings Bank, Orland Park, Illinois, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and FirstMerit Bank, N.A., dated as of February 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by FirstMerit Corporation on February 22, 2010).
       
 
  3.1    
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of FirstMerit Corporation, as amended (filed herewith).
       
 
  3.2    
Second Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of FirstMerit Corporation, as amended (filed herewith).
       
 
  10.1    
FirstMerit Corporation 2010 Retention Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by FirstMerit Corporation on February 22, 2010).
       
 
  10.2    
Distribution Agency Agreement dated March 3, 2010 between FirstMerit Corporation and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by FirstMerit Corporation on March 3, 2010).
       
 
  10.3    
Distribution Agency Agreement dated March 3, 2010 between FirstMerit Corporation and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by FirstMerit Corporation on March 3, 2010).
       
 
  31.1    
Rule 13a-14(a)/Section 302 Certification of Paul G. Greig, Chief Executive Officer of FirstMerit Corporation.
       
 
  31.2    
Rule 13a-14(a)/Section 302 Certification of Terrence E. Bichsel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FirstMerit Corporation.
       
 
  32.1    
Rule 13a-14(b)/Section 906 Certification of Paul G. Greig, Chief Executive Officer of FirstMerit Corporation.
       
 
  32.2    
Rule 13a-14(b)/Section 906 Certification of Terrence E. Bichsel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FirstMerit Corporation.

75


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION
 
 
  By:   /s/TERRENCE E. BICHSEL    
    Terrence E. Bichsel, Executive Vice President   
    and Chief Financial Officer
   (duly authorized officer of registrant and principal financial officer) 
 
 
May 10, 2010

76