Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex31-2.htm |
EX-10.2 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex10-2.htm |
EX-10.1 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex10-1.htm |
EX-31.1 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex31-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex32-1.htm |
EX-32.2 - PC GROUP, INC. | v183230_ex32-2.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File No. 0-12991
PC
GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
11-2239561
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
employer
|
|||
of
incorporation or organization)
|
identification
number)
|
419
Park Avenue South, Suite 500, New York, New York 10016
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (212) 687-3260
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
x
|
NO
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
YES
o
|
NO o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
Reporting Company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
|
NO
x
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Stock, Par Value $.02— 7,848,774 shares as of May 4, 2010.
INDEX
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Page
|
||||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets As
of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009
|
3
|
|||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three
month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Three
month period ended March 31, 2010
|
5
|
|||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three
month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
6
|
|||
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
16
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
22
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
24
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
||
Signatures
|
27
|
|||
Exhibit
Index
|
28
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 3,178,557 | $ | 4,599,940 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and
returns and
allowances aggregating $89,531 and $314,440, respectively
|
6,255,956 | 4,394,180 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
6,745,827 | 5,988,209 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,031,600 | 1,190,081 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
17,211,940 | 16,172,410 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
8,353,064 | 8,490,229 | ||||||
Identifiable
intangible assets, net
|
7,781,682 | 8,017,568 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
11,175,637 | 11,175,637 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
380,119 | 426,073 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 44,902,442 | $ | 44,281,917 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 3,217,999 | $ | 2,422,003 | ||||
Obligation
under capital lease—current portion
|
130,240 | 81,011 | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
3,061,760 | 2,299,920 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
6,409,999 | 4,802,934 | ||||||
Long-term
debt:
|
||||||||
5%
Convertible Notes, net of debt discount of $750,000 at March 31, 2010 and
$862,500 at December 31, 2009
|
28,130,000 | 28,017,500 | ||||||
Obligation
under capital lease
|
2,569,760 | 2,618,989 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes payable
|
698,010 | 698,010 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
2,150 | 1,210 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
37,809,919 | 36,138,643 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 250,000 shares; no shares
issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, $.02 par value; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 11,648,512
shares
|
232,971 | 232,971 | ||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
53,738,787 | 53,686,944 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(44,428,539 | ) | (43,354,339 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
511,353 | 539,747 | ||||||
10,054,572 | 11,105,323 | |||||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 3,799,738 shares
|
(2,962,049 | ) | (2,962,049 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
7,092,523 | 8,143,274 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 44,902,442 | $ | 44,281,917 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 10,457,979 | $ | 9,064,923 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
7,416,318 | 6,911,697 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,041,661 | 2,153,226 | ||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
1,912,482 | 2,054,241 | ||||||
Selling
expenses
|
1,331,458 | 1,176,318 | ||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
245,821 | 234,905 | ||||||
Operating
loss
|
(448,100 | ) | (1,312,238 | ) | ||||
Other
expense, net:
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
15,162 | 8,704 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
(640,157 | ) | (645,288 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(1,105 | ) | 24,714 | |||||
Other
expense, net
|
(626,100 | ) | (611,870 | ) | ||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(1,074,200 | ) | (1,924,108 | ) | ||||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
— | 1,075,200 | ||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,074,200 | ) | (848,908 | ) | ||||
Discontinued
Operations:
Loss
from operations of discontinued subsidiaries
|
— | (75,876 | ) | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
— | — | ||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
— | (75,876 | ) | |||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (1,074,200 | ) | $ | (924,784 | ) | ||
Net
Loss per common share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted:
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
— | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | ||
Weighted
average number of common shares used in computation of net (loss) per
share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
7,848,774 | 8,659,474 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Foreign
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Treasury
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Currency
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders’
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Translation
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2010
|
11,648,512 | $ | 232,971 | $ | (2,962,049 | ) | $ | 53,686,944 | $ | (43,354,339 | ) | $ | 539,747 | $ | 8,143,274 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(1,074,200 | ) | $ | (1,074,200 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency adjustment
|
(28,394 | ) | (28,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (1,102,594 | ) | (1,102,594 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
51,843 | 51,843 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
March 31, 2010
|
11,648,512 | $ | 232,971 | $ | (2,962,049 | ) | $ | 53,738,787 | $ | (44,428,539 | ) | $ | 511,353 | $ | (7,092,523 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,074,200 | ) | $ | (924,784 | ) | ||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
— | 75,876 | ||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,074,200 | ) | (848,908 | ) | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
of property and equipment and amortization of identifiable intangible
assets
|
588,676 | 673,721 | ||||||
Amortization
of debt acquisition costs
|
90,080 | 90,081 | ||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
112,500 | 112,500 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
51,843 | 50,106 | ||||||
Increase
(decrease) in fair value of derivative
|
940 | (25,000 | ) | |||||
Provision
for (recovery of) doubtful accounts receivable
|
(65,771 | ) | 9,011 | |||||
Deferred
income tax benefit
|
— | (1,075,200 | ) | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,878,677 | ) | 247,655 | |||||
Inventories
|
(772,206 | ) | 196,315 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(11,602 | ) | (41,165 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
(44,125 | ) | 739 | |||||
Accounts
payable and other current liabilities
|
1,564,919 | 639,062 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations
|
(1,437,623 | ) | 28,917 | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
— | ― | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(1,437,623 | ) | 28,917 | |||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(215,625 | ) | (350,846 | ) | ||||
Net
proceeds from sale of subsidiary
|
237,500 | 116,418 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities for continuing
operations
|
21,875 | (234,428 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities of discontinued
operations
|
— | ― | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
21,875 | (234,428 | ) |
6
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
— | (92,856 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in financing activities of continuing operations
|
— | (92,856 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in financing activities of discontinued
operations
|
— | ― | ||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
— | (92,856 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(5,635 | ) | (6,184 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,421,383 | ) | (304,551 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
4,599,940 | 4,003,460 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 3,178,557 | $ | 3,698,909 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 72,077 | $ | 110,753 | ||||
Income
Taxes
|
$ | 250 | $ | 4,600 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Non Cash Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities relating to property and
equipment
|
$ | — | $ | 101,295 |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
7
PC
GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies and Other
Matters
|
(a)
|
Name
Change
|
On July
23, 2009, the Company changed its name from Langer, Inc. to PC Group,
Inc. The name change was approved at the Company’s 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on July 14, 2009. The Company also
changed its stock ticker symbol on NASDAQ from “GAIT” to “PCGR” effective at the
commencement of trading on July 24, 2009.
The new
name is intended to more accurately reflect the Company’s current business model
and scope of its product offerings. The Company has historically
designed, manufactured and distributed a broad range of medical products
targeting the orthopedic, orthotic, and prosthetic markets. Today,
the Company offers a more diverse line of personal care products for the private
label retail, medical and therapeutic markets and the name PC Group, Inc. better
conveys this broader scope of products.
(b)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals), other than the purchases and sale of affiliates discussed herein,
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the related financial statements and consolidated notes, included in the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009.
Operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2010.
The
Company classifies as discontinued operations for all periods presented any
component of our business that is probable of being sold or has been sold that
has operations and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally and
for financial reporting purposes. For those components, the Company
has no significant continuing involvement after disposal, and their operations
and cash flows are eliminated from ongoing operations. Sales of
significant components of our business not classified as discontinued operations
are reported as a component of income from continuing operations.
(c)
|
Non-recurring,
non-cash benefit
|
In the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company realized a non-recurring,
non-cash benefit from income taxes of approximately $1,075,000. This
benefit results from the reversal of a previously established tax valuation
allowance which is no longer required as a result of a change in the estimated
useful life of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of
18 years effective January 1, 2009.
(d)
|
Seasonality
|
Factors which can result in quarterly
variations include the timing and amount of new business generated by the
Company, the timing of new product introductions, the Company’s revenue mix, and
the competitive and fluctuating economic conditions in the medical and skincare
industries.
8
(e)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The total
stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
was $51,843 and $50,106, respectively, and is included in general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations.
The
Company accounts for share-based compensation cost in accordance with FASB ASC
718-10 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment”). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the
date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The
compensation cost is recognized over the service period which is usually the
vesting period of the award. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the price of the Company’s stock. The
risk-free interest rate is based on Treasury issues with a term equal to the
expected life of the option. The Company uses historical data to
estimate expected dividend yield, expected life and forfeiture
rates. For stock options granted as consideration for services
rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes compensation expense in
accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC 505-50 (prior authoritative
literature: EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued
to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and
Services” and EITF 00-18 “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions
involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees”).
(f)
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
FASB ASC
820-10 (prior authoritative literature: SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”),
was adopted January 1, 2008, and provides guidance related to estimating fair
value and requires expanded disclosures. The standard applies whenever other
standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair
value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances. In February 2008, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the
implementation of FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial assets and liabilities
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
non-recurring basis. The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 for non-financial
assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009, which did not have a material
impact on the results of operations. On a nonrecurring basis, the Company uses
fair value measures when analyzing asset impairment. Long-lived tangible assets
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined
such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be
fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining
amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value.
During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company evaluates goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment at the reporting unit
level.
The fair
value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data
(observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable
inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
|
·
|
Level
one— Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
|
|
·
|
Level
two— Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or
indirectly observable; and
|
|
·
|
Level
three— Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions,
which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions
that a market participant would
use.
|
The
following table identifies the financial assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value by level at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
March 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money
Markets
|
$ | 2,718,470 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,314,514 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,150 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,210 |
9
A level 3 unobservable input is used
when little or no market data is available. The derivative liability is valued
using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model using various assumptions. These
assumptions are more fully discussed below.
The following table provides a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities
valued using significant unobservable inputs (level 3):
Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Derivative
liability:
|
||||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$ | 1,210 | $ | 30,000 | ||||
Total
(gains) losses included in earnings
|
940 | (25,000 | ) | |||||
Ending
balance
|
$ | 2,150 | $ | 5,000 |
Total
gains and losses included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 are reported as other income in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Although
there were no fair value adjustments to non-financial assets, the following
table identifies the non-financial assets that are measured at fair value by
level at March 31, 2010:
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
Gains
(Losses)
|
||||||||||||
Identifiable
Intangible Assets
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,781,682 | $ | — | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
— | — | 11,175,637 | — | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,957,319 | $ | — |
As prescribed under adopted FASB ASC
360-10 (prior authoritative literature: FAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets,”) the Company tests annually for possible impairment to goodwill. The
Company performs its test as of October 1st each year using a discounted cash
flow analysis that requires that certain assumptions and estimates be made
regarding industry economic factors and future growth and profitability at each
of our reporting units. The Company also incorporates market participant
assumptions to estimate fair value for impairment testing. The Company’s
definite lived intangible assets are tested under FASB ASC 350-30 (prior
authoritative literature: FAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets”) when impairment indicators are present. An
undiscounted model is used to determine if the carrying value of the asset is
recoverable. If not, a discounted analysis is done to determine the
fair value. The Company engages a valuation analysis expert to
prepare the models and calculations used to perform the tests, and the Company
provides them with estimates regarding our reporting units’ expected growth and
performance for future years.
At March 31, 2010, the carrying amount
of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximated fair
value because of their short-term maturity. The carrying value of
long-term debt, net of discount, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$28,130,000 and $28,017,500, respectively. The approximated fair
value of long-term debt based on borrowing rates currently available to the
Company for debt with similar terms was $27,942,691 at March 31,
2010. Fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow
model.
10
(g)
|
Discount
on Convertible Debt
|
In June
2008, the FASB published FASB ASC 815-40 (prior authoritative literature: EITF
Issue 07-5 “Determining Whether an Instrument is Indexed to an Entity’s Own
Stock”) to address concerns regarding the meaning of “indexed to an entity’s own
stock” contained in FASB ASC 815-10 (prior authoritative
literature: “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities”). FASB ASC 815-40 addresses the issue of the
determination of whether a free-standing equity-linked instrument should be
classified as equity or debt. If an instrument is classified as debt,
it is valued at fair value, and this value is remeasured on an ongoing basis,
with changes recorded in earnings in each reporting period. FASB ASC
815-40 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption was not permitted. Although FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, any outstanding instrument at
the date of adoption requires a retrospective application of the accounting
principle through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon
adoption. The Company completed an analysis as it pertains to the
conversion option in its convertible debt, which was triggered by the reset
provision, and determined that the fair value of the derivative liability was
$30,000 and the debt discount was $1,312,500 at January 1, 2009. The
Company estimates the fair value of the derivative liability using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
March 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Annual
dividend yield
|
— | — | ||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
1.69 | 1.94 | ||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.60 | % | 1.70 | % | ||||
Expected
volatility
|
80 | % | 80 | % |
Expected volatility is based upon
historical volatility. The Company believes this method produces an
estimate that is representative of the Company’s expectations of future
volatility over the expected term of the derivative liability. The
Company currently has no reason to believe future volatility over the expected
remaining life of this conversion option is likely to differ materially from
historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining
term of the conversion option. The risk-free interest rate is based
on three-year U.S. Treasury securities. The Company recorded an
adjustment to retained earnings in the amount of $1,459,109, which represents
the cumulative change in the fair value of the conversion option, net of the
impact of amortization of the additional debt discount from date of issuance of
the notes (December 8, 2006) through adoption of this
pronouncement. In addition, as required by FASB ASC 815-40, the
Company recorded an adjustment to reduce additional paid in capital in the
amount of $476,873, which represents the reversal of the value of the debt
discount that was recorded in paid in capital in connection with a reset of the
bond conversion price in January 2007. The debt discount is being
amortized over the remaining life of the debt resulting in greater interest
expense. Interest related to the discount amounted to $112,500 in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(2) Discontinued
Operations
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of Langer UK on
January 18, 2008, Regal on June 11, 2008, Bi-Op on July 31, 2008 and
substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities related to the Langer
branded custom orthotics and related products business on October 24,
2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the operating
results of these wholly owned subsidiaries and businesses, which were formerly
included in the medical products and Regal segments, represent an adjustment to
increase the loss on the sale of Regal in the amount of $75,876.
(3)
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Identifiable
intangible assets at March 31, 2010 consisted of:
Assets
|
Estimated
Useful Life (Years)
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Carrying
Value
|
||||||||||||
Trade
names – Silipos
|
18
|
$
|
2,688,000
|
$
|
186,667
|
$
|
2,501,333
|
|||||||||
Repeat
customer base – Silipos
|
7
|
1,680,000
|
1,500,484
|
179,516
|
||||||||||||
License
agreements and related technology – Silipos
|
9.5
|
1,364,000
|
789,684
|
574,316
|
||||||||||||
Repeat
customer base – Twincraft
|
19
|
3,814,500
|
1,555,278
|
2,259,222
|
||||||||||||
Trade
names – Twincraft
|
23
|
2,629,300
|
362,005
|
2,267,295
|
||||||||||||
|
$
|
12,175,800
|
$
|
4,394,118
|
$
|
7,781,682
|
Identifiable
intangible assets at December 31, 2009 consisted of:
11
Assets
|
Estimated
Useful Life (Years)
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Carrying
Value
|
||||||||||||
Trade
names—Silipos
|
18
|
$ | 2,688,000 | $ | 149,334 | $ | 2,538,666 | |||||||||
Repeat
customer base—Silipos
|
7
|
1,680,000 | 1,432,186 | 247,814 | ||||||||||||
License
agreements and related technology—Silipos
|
9.5
|
1,364,000 | 753,790 | 610,210 | ||||||||||||
Repeat
customer base—Twincraft
|
19
|
3,814,500 | 1,489,496 | 2,325,004 | ||||||||||||
Trade
names—Twincraft
|
23
|
2,629,300 | 333,426 | 2,295,874 | ||||||||||||
$ | 12,175,800 | $ | 4,158,232 | $ | 8,017,568 |
As of
December 31, 2009, it was determined that the carrying value of the Twincraft
customer base was not recoverable and, accordingly, was written down to its fair
value resulting in an impairment of $1,000,000. Also, effective
January 1, 2009, the Company changed the estimated useful life of the Silipos
tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of 18 years.
Aggregate
amortization expense relating to the above identifiable intangible assets for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $235,886 and $265,158,
respectively. As of March 31, 2010, the estimated future amortization
expense is $680,805 for the remainder of 2010, $657,256 for 2011, $748,775 for
2012, $699,396 for 2013, $535,961 for 2014 and $4,459,489
thereafter.
(4)
Inventories, net
Inventories,
net, consisted of the following:
|
March 31, 2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 4,208,543 | $ | 3,752,980 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
431,889 | 277,372 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
2,740,908 | 2,572,236 | ||||||
7,381,340 | 6,602,588 | |||||||
Less:
Allowance for excess and obsolescence
|
(635,513 | ) | (614,379 | ) | ||||
$ | 6,745,827 | $ | 5,988,209 |
(5) Credit
Facility
On
May 11, 2007, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit facility
agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia”),
expiring on September 30, 2011. During 2008, the Company entered two
amendments that decreased the maximum amount that the Company may
borrow. The Credit Facility, as amended, provides an aggregate
maximum availability, if and when the Company has the requisite levels of
assets, in the amount of $12 million, and is subject to a sub-limit of $5
million for the issuance of letter of credit obligations, another sub-limit of
$3 million for term loans, and a sub-limit of $4 million on loans against
inventory. Loans under the Credit Facility will bear interest at 0.5
percent above the lender’s prime rate or, at the Company’s election, at 2.5
percentage points above an Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the Credit
Facility. The Credit Facility is collateralized by a first priority
security interest in inventory, accounts receivables and all other assets and is
guaranteed on a full and unconditional basis by the Company and each of the
Company’s domestic subsidiaries (Silipos and Twincraft) and any other company or
person that hereafter becomes a borrower or owner of any property in which the
lender has a security interest under the Credit Facility. As of March
31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding advances under the Credit Facility and
has approximately $6.5 million available under the Credit Facility related to
eligible accounts receivable and inventory. In addition, the Company
has approximately $1.8 million of availability related to property and equipment
for term loans.
If
the Company’s availability under the Credit Facility drops below $3 million or
borrowings under the facility exceed $10 million, the Company is required under
the Credit Facility to deposit all cash received from customers into a blocked
bank account that will be swept daily to directly pay down any amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility. In such event, the Company
would not have any control over the blocked bank account.
12
The
Company’s borrowing availabilities under the Credit Facility are limited to 85%
of eligible accounts receivable and 60% of eligible inventory, and are subject
to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Term loans shall be secured by
equipment or real estate hereafter acquired. The Company is required to submit
monthly unaudited financial statements to Wachovia.
If
the Company’s availability is less than $3 million, the Credit Facility requires
compliance with various covenants including but not limited to a fixed charge
coverage ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. Availability under the
Credit Facility is reduced by 40% of the outstanding letters of credit related
to the purchase of eligible inventory, as defined, and 100% of all other
outstanding letters of credit. At March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding
letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory of approximately
$332,000 .
To
the extent that amounts under the Credit Facility remain unused, while the
Credit Facility is in effect and for so long thereafter as any of the
obligations under the Credit Facility are outstanding, the Company will pay a
monthly commitment fee of three eights of one percent (0.375%) on the unused
portion of the loan commitment. The Company paid Wachovia a closing fee in the
amount of $75,000 in August 2007. In addition, the Company paid legal and other
costs associated with obtaining the Credit Facility of $319,556 in
2007. In April 2008, the Company paid a $20,000 fee to Wachovia
related to an amendment of the Credit Facility, which has been recorded as a
deferred financing cost and is being amortized over the remaining term of the
Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had unamortized deferred
financing costs in connection with the Credit Facility of $191,147. Amortization
expense for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was
$23,893.
(6)
Segment Information
As
of March 31, 2010, the Company operated in two segments (medical products and
personal care). Our medical products segment includes the Silipos
medical business. Our personal care segment includes Twincraft and the Silipos
skincare business. Assets and expenses related to the Company’s
corporate offices are reported under “other” as they do not relate to any of the
operating segments. Intersegment sales are recorded at
cost.
Segment
information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as
follows:
Three months ended March 31, 2010
|
Medical Products
|
Personal Care
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 2,570,060 | $ | 7,887,919 | $ | — | $ | 10,457,979 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,350,636 | 1,691,025 | — | 3,041,661 | |||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
205,351 | 81,607 | (735,058 | ) | (448,100 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
assets as of March 31, 2010
|
17,697,732 | 22,912,376 | 4,292,334 | 44,902,442 |
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
Medical Products
|
Personal Care
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 2,096,443 | $ | 6,968,480 | $ | — | $ | 9,064,923 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
935,300 | 1,217,926 | — | 2,153,226 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(76,926 | ) | (348,275 | ) | (887,037 | ) | (1,312,238 | ) | ||||||||
Total
assets as of March 31, 2009
|
17,786,424 | 29,070,955 | 6,035,853 | 52,893,232 |
Geographical
segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is
summarized as follows:
13
Three months ended March 31, 2010,
|
United
States
|
Canada
|
Europe
|
Other
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$ | 7,875,163 | $ | 818,412 | $ | 856,692 | $ | 907,712 | $ | 10,457,979 | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,952,035 | 171,988 | 440,853 | 476,785 | 3,041,661 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(688,000 | ) | 19,247 | 105,709 | 114,944 | (448,100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total
assets as of March 31, 2010
|
44,632,649 | — | 269,793 | — | 44,902,442 |
Three months ended March 31, 2009,
|
United
States
|
Canada
|
Europe
|
Other
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$ | 7,506,762 | $ | 171,342 | $ | 1,036,425 | $ | 350,394 | $ | 9,064,923 | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,572,010 | 30,521 | 394,499 | 156,196 | 2,153,226 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(1,324,502 | ) | (4,943 | ) | 9,646 | 7,561 | (1,312,238 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
assets as of March 31, 2009
|
52,568,810 | — | 324,422 | — | 52,893,232 |
(7)
Comprehensive Loss
The Company’s comprehensive losses were
as follows:
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,074,200 | ) | $ | (924,784 | ) | ||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||
Change
in equity resulting from translation of financial statements into U.S.
dollars
|
(28,394 | ) | (23,513 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$ | (1,102,594 | ) | $ | (948,297 | ) |
(8)
Loss per share
Basic
earnings per common share (“EPS”) are computed based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS are computed
based on the weighted average number of common shares, after giving effect to
dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The diluted
loss per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
exclude approximately 1,728,000 shares each, related to employee stock options
because the effect of including them would be anti-dilutive. The impact of the
5% Convertible Notes (as hereinafter defined) on the calculation of the
fully-diluted EPS was anti-dilutive and is therefore not included in the
computation for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
each.
The
following table provides the basic and diluted loss EPS:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
Loss
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted EPS
|
$ | (1,074,200 | ) | 7,848,774 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (924,784 | ) | 8,659,474 | $ | (0.11 | ) |
(9)
Related Party Transactions
5% Convertible Subordinated
Notes. On December 8, 2006, the Company sold $28,880,000 of the
Company’s 5% Convertible Notes due December 7, 2011 (the “5% Convertible Notes”)
in a private placement. The number of shares of common stock issuable on
conversion of the 5% Convertible Notes, as of March 31, 2010, was 6,195,165, and
the conversion price as of such date was $4.6617. The number of shares and
conversion price are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors,
and largest beneficial shareholder, Warren B. Kanders, purchased $3,250,000,
President and CEO, W. Gray Hudkins, and CFO and COO, Kathleen P. Bloch, each
purchased $250,000 of the Company’s 5% Convertible Notes from certain previous
debt holders. Mr. Kanders and trusts controlled by Mr.
Kanders (as trustee for members of his family) own $5,250,000 of the
5% Convertible Notes, and one director, Stuart P. Greenspon, owns $150,000 of
the 5% Convertible Notes. On September 29, 2008, an affiliate of Mr.
Kanders entered into letter agreements with Mr. Hudkins and Ms. Bloch pursuant
to which they agreed (i) not to sell, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of
or convert into common stock, any portion of the 5% Convertible Notes
respectively owned by them, and (ii) to cast all votes which they respectively
may cast with respect to any shares of common stock underlying the 5%
Convertible Notes in the same manner and proportion as shares of common stock
voted by Mr. Kanders and his affiliates.
14
(10)
Litigation
The
Company received a letter from Langer Biomechanics, Inc. f/k/a Langer
Acquisition Corp. (“Langer Biomechanics”) dated September 17, 2009, alleging the
breach by the Company of certain representations and warranties contained in the
Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 24, 2008 between the Company and Langer
Biomechanics (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), related to the sale of the assets
and liabilities of the Company’s former Langer branded custom orthotics and
related products business. No damages were alleged by Langer
Biomechanics at the time. As a result of Langer Biomechanics’
allegation, a receivable in the amount of $237,500 that was scheduled to be
released to the Company from escrow on October 24, 2009, continued to be held in
escrow in accordance with the terms of the Escrow Agreement dated October 24,
2008, by and among the Company, Langer Biomechanics, and The Bank of New York
Mellon. On February 18, 2010, Langer Biomechanics filed a formal
claim of indemnification. However, since the alleged damages were
below the alleged indemnification threshold in the Asset Purchase Agreement,
Langer Biomechanics agreed to release the remaining amount being held in
escrow. On March 1, 2010, the remaining escrow balance was released
and received by the Company.
Additionally,
in the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to claims and
litigation in the areas of general liability, including claims of employees, and
claims, litigation or other liabilities as a result of acquisitions completed.
The results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict and the Company cannot
provide any assurance that an action or proceeding will not be commenced against
the Company or that the Company will prevail in any such action or
proceeding.
An unfavorable resolution of any legal
action or proceeding could materially adversely affect the market price of the
Company’s common stock and its business, results of operations, liquidity, or
financial condition.
15
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Overview
Through
our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Twincraft and Silipos, we offer a diverse line of
personal care products for the private label retail, medical, and therapeutic
markets. In addition, at Silipos, we design and manufacture high
quality gel-based medical products targeting the orthopedic and prosthetic
markets. We sell our medical products primarily in the United States
and Canada, as well as in more than 30 other countries, to national, regional,
and international distributors. We sell our personal care products
primarily in North America to branded marketers of such products, specialty and
mass market retailers, direct marketing companies, and companies that service
various amenities markets.
Our broad
range of gel-based orthopedic and prosthetics products are designed to protect,
heal, and provide comfort for the patient. Our line of personal care
products includes bar soap, gel-based therapeutic gloves and socks, scar
management products, and other products that are designed to cleanse and
moisturize specific areas of the body, often incorporating essential oils,
vitamins, and nutrients to improve the appearance and condition of the
skin.
Twincraft,
a manufacturer of bar soap, focuses on the health and beauty, direct marketing,
amenities, and mass market channels, was acquired in January 2007, and Silipos,
which offers gel-based personal care and medical products was acquired in
September 2004.
Recent
Developments:
Name
Change
On July
23, 2009, we changed our name from Langer, Inc. to PC Group, Inc. The
name change was approved at our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on July
14, 2009. We also changed our stock ticker symbol on NASDAQ from
“GAIT” to “PCGR” effective at the commencement of trading on July 24,
2009.
The new
name is intended to more accurately reflect our current business model and scope
of our product offerings. We have historically designed, manufactured
and distributed a broad range of medical products targeting the orthopedic,
orthotic, and prosthetic markets. Today, we offer a more diverse line
of personal care products for the private label retail, medical and therapeutic
markets and the name PC Group, Inc. is designed to better convey this broader
scope of products.
NASDAQ
Stock Market Listing
On
January 11, 2010, we received notice from the Office of General Counsel of the
Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) that our request to transfer the listing of our
common stock from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market had been
approved by the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”) reviewing our
listing. The transfer became effective at the opening of the market
on January 13, 2010. Our common stock continues to trade under the
symbol “PCGR.” The Panel also granted us until July 19, 2010 to meet
the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market under
Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).
We
submitted our request to the Panel to transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market in
response to the letter we received from Nasdaq, previously disclosed on the Form
8-K we filed on October 28, 2009, informing us that for 30 consecutive business
days our common stock had not maintained the minimum market value of publicly
held shares of $5,000,000 for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Global Market
under Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C).
The
Nasdaq Capital Market is a continuous trading market that operates in
substantially the same manner as the Nasdaq Global Market. Companies
listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market must meet certain financial requirements and
adhere to Nasdaq’s corporate governance standards.
16
Segment
Information
We currently operate in two segments,
medical products and personal care products. The operations of
Twincraft and the personal care products of Silipos are included in the personal
care segment. The medical products segment includes the medical,
orthopedic and prosthetic gel-based products of Silipos.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 24.6%
and 23.1%, respectively, of our revenues from continuing operations from our
medical products segment and approximately 75.4% and 76.9%, respectively, from
our personal care products segment. For the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, we derived approximately 83.1% and 84.7%, respectively, of
our revenues from North America, and approximately 16.9% and 15.3% of our
revenues from outside North America. Of our revenue derived from
North America, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and 2009,
approximately 90.6% and approximately 97.8%, respectively, was generated in the
United States and approximately 9.4% and approximately 2.2%, respectively, was
generated from Canada.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with
absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the
exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Goodwill
and other identifiable intangible assets comprise a substantial portion (42.2%
at March 31, 2010 and 43.3% at December 31, 2009) of our total
assets. As prescribed under FASB ASC 350-10 (prior authoritative
literature: SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), we test
annually for possible impairment to goodwill. We engage a valuation
analysis expert to prepare the models and calculations used to perform the
tests, and we provide them with information regarding our reporting units’
expected growth and performance for future years. The method to
compute the amount of impairment incorporates quantitative data and qualitative
criteria including new information that can dramatically change the decision
about the valuation of an intangible asset in a very short period of
time. The Company continually monitors the expected cash flows of its
reporting units for the purpose of assessing the carrying values of its goodwill
and its other intangible assets. Any resulting impairment loss could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reported financial position and
results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual
period.
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company’s market capitalization was approximately
$3,532,000, which is substantially lower than the Company’s estimated combined
fair values of its three reporting units. The Company has completed a
reconciliation of the sum of the estimated fair values of its reporting units as
of October 1, 2009 (the annual testing date) to its market value (based upon its
stock price at March 31, 2010), which included the quantification of a
controlling interest premium. The Company has $28.8 million of
convertible notes at the corporate level that are not allocated to the reporting
units. This was done because this financing was raised for corporate
strategic alternatives and not to fund the operations of the individual
reporting units. Also, the Company’s corporate-level expenses are not
allocated to the individual reporting units as they do not relate to their
operations. In addition, the Company considers the following
qualitative items that cannot be accurately quantified and are based upon the
beliefs of management, but provide additional support for the explanation of the
remaining difference between the estimated fair value of the Company’s report
units and its market capitalization:
|
·
|
The
Company’s stock is thinly traded;
|
|
·
|
The
decline in the Company’s stock price is not correlated to a change in the
overall operating performance of the Company;
and
|
|
·
|
Previously
unseen pressures are in place given the global financial and economic
crisis.
|
17
There can
be no assurances that the Company’s estimated fair value of its reporting units
will be reflected in the Company’s market capitalization in the
future.
Three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
The
Company’s loss from continuing operations before income taxes was approximately
$(1,074,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to a net loss
from continuing operations before income taxes of approximately $(1,924,000) for
the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in the Company’s
net loss from continuing operations before income taxes is primarily due to an
increase in gross profit of approximately $888,000 due to higher net sales and a
higher margin percentage in the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2009. These factors are more
fully discussed below. Net loss from continuing operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $(1,074,000) or $(0.14)
per share on a fully diluted basis, compared to a net loss from continuing
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $(848,908)
or $(0.10) per share on a fully diluted basis. The operating results
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 include a non-recurring, non-cash
deferred tax benefit of approximately $1,075,000. This benefit
results from the reversal of a previously established tax valuation allowance
which is no longer required as a result of a change in the estimated useful life
of the Silipos tradename from an indefinite life to a useful life of
approximately 18 years effective January 1, 2009.
Net sales
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were approximately $10,458,000
compared to approximately $9,065,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
an increase of approximately $1,393,000, or 15.4%. Twincraft’s net
sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were approximately $7,464,000,
an increase of approximately $826,000, or 12.4% as compared to net sales of
approximately $6,638,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009. This increase is attributable to new customers obtained in the
national brand-equivalent products business as well as increases in sales to
existing customers. Silipos’ net sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 were approximately $2,994,000, an increase of approximately
$568,000, or 23.4% as compared to net sales of approximately $2,426,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase is primarily
attributable to an increase in the volume of orders from certain existing
customers.
Twincraft’s
sales are reported in the personal care products segment. Also
included in the personal care products segment are the net sales of Silipos
personal care products which were approximately $424,000 in the three months
ended March 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $94,000 or 28.5% as compared
to Silipos’ net sales of personal care products of approximately $330,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Net sales
of medical products were approximately $2,570,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to approximately $2,096,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2009, an increase of approximately $474,000 or 22.6% as a result of
the factors discussed above.
Cost of
sales, on a consolidated basis, increased approximately $504,000, or 7.3%, to
approximately $7,416,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
approximately $6,912,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 70.9% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to 76.2% for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in cost of goods as a percentage
of net sales is attributable to a decrease in raw material prices at Twincraft
in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2009. In addition, due to higher sales, production levels
at Silipos increased in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009, which resulted in increases to overhead
absorption.
Cost of
sales in the medical products segment were approximately $1,219,000, or 47.4% of
medical products net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
approximately $1,162,000 or 55.4% of medical products net sales in the three
months ended March 31, 2009, largely due to higher production levels
which resulted in higher manufacturing overhead absorption.
Cost of
sales for the personal care products were approximately $6,197,000, or 78.6% of
net sales of personal care products in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to approximately $5,750,000, or 82.5% of net sales of personal care
products in the three months ended March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the
factors discussed above.
18
Consolidated
gross profit increased approximately $888,000, or 41.3%, to approximately
$3,041,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to approximately
$2,153,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Consolidated
gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was 29.1%, compared to 23.8% for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Increases in net sales, reductions in raw material prices at
Twincraft and higher overhead absorption all contributed to the increase in
consolidated gross profit.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
approximately $1,912,000, or 18.0% of net sales, compared to approximately
$2,054,000, or 22.7% of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
representing a decrease of approximately $142,000. Approximately
$90,000 of the decrease is related to reductions in salaries and rents as a
result of our continuing efforts to reduce our corporate overhead
structure. In addition, legal fees decreased by approximately $45,000
and amortization of intangibles is approximately $29,000 lower in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2009. These decreases were offset by an increase in other
professional fees of approximately $36,000 related to the search for a new
CEO.
Selling
expenses increased approximately $155,000, or 13.2%, to approximately $1,331,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to approximately $1,176,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Selling expenses as a
percentage of net sales were 12.7% in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to 13.0% in the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
principal reasons for the increase were an increase in sales salaries and
related travel and entertainment expenses at Silipos of approximately $104,000
related to the hiring of additional personnel, including the vice-president of
sales and marketing in 2009 and an increase in advertising expenses of
approximately $20,000.
Research
and development expenses increased from approximately $235,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2009, to approximately $246,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $11,000, or 4.7%. This
increase is primarily attributable to an increase in clinical study costs at
Silipos of approximately $53,000, which was offset by a reduction in salaries of
approximately $36,000.
Interest
expense was approximately $640,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to approximately $645,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, a
decrease of approximately $5,000 as a result of lower interest expense on the
capital lease of the Silipos facility.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Working
capital as of March 31, 2010 was approximately $10,800,000, compared to
approximately $11,369,000 as of December 31, 2009, a decrease of approximately
$568,000. This reduction is primarily the result of increases in
accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $1,547,000, coupled with
a decrease in cash of approximately 1,421,000, offset by increases in accounts
receivable of approximately $1,862,000 and inventories of approximately
$758,000. Unrestricted cash balances were approximately $3,179,000 at
March 31, 2010, as compared to approximately $4,600,000 at December 31,
2009.
Net cash
used in operating activities of continuing operations was approximately
$1,438,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The cash used is
attributable to our loss from continuing operations of approximately $1,074,000,
net of depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash expenses of approximately
$844,000 and changes in our current assets and liabilities of approximately
$1,207,000. Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing
operations was approximately $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations for three
months ended March 31, 2009 is attributable to our loss from continuing
operations of $(849,000) and non-cash deferred tax benefit of approximately
$1,075,000, which was offset by non-cash depreciation, amortization, and other
non-cash expenses of approximately $875,000 and changes in the balances of
current assets and liabilities of approximately $1,078,000.
Net cash
provided by investing activities was approximately $22,000 in the three months
ended March 31, 2010. Net cash used in investing activities was
approximately $234,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash
flows provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010
were as a result of cash released from escrow which was related to the sale of
Langer Branded Orthotics of approximately $238,000, offset by approximately
$216,000 of cash used to purchase equipment. Net cash used in
investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2009 reflects the net
cash proceeds from the sale of Langer Branded Orthotics of approximately
$116,000, offset by purchases of property and equipment of approximately
$350,000.
19
The
Company did not have any cash flows from financing activities in the three
months ended March 31, 2010. Cash used in financing activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $93,000 and represents
amounts used to purchase treasury stock.
In the
three months ended March 31, 2010, we generated a net loss of approximately
$(1,074,000), compared to a net loss of approximately $(925,000) for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, an increase in net loss of approximately
$149,000. There can be no assurance that our business will generate
cash flow from operations sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity
needs. We may finance acquisitions of other companies or product
lines in the future from existing cash balances, through borrowings from banks
or other institutional lenders, and/or the public or private offerings of debt
or equity securities. We cannot make any assurances that any such funds will be
available to us on favorable terms, or at all.
Our
Credit Facility with Wachovia Bank expires on September 30,
2011. During 2008, the Company entered into two amendments that
decreased the maximum amount that the Company may borrow. The Credit
Facility, as amended, provides an aggregate maximum availability, if and when
the Company has the requisite levels of assets, in the amount of $12
million. The Credit Facility bears interest at 0.5 percent above the
lender’s prime rate or, at the Company’s election, at 2.5 percentage points
above an Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, as defined. The obligations under
the Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and
are secured by a first priority security interest in all the assets of the
Company and its subsidiaries. The Credit Facility requires compliance
with various covenants including but not limited to a Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 at all times when excess availability is less
than $3 million. As of March 31, 2010, the Company does not have any
outstanding advances under the Credit Facility and has approximately $8.3
million (which includes approximately $1.8 million in term loans based upon the
value of Twincraft’s machinery and equipment) available under the Credit
Facility. Availability under the Credit Facility is reduced by 40% of
the outstanding letters of credit related to the purchase of eligible inventory,
as defined, and 100% of all other outstanding letters of credit. At
March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit related to the
purchase of eligible inventory of approximately $332,000, and no other
outstanding letters of credit.
Long-Term
Debt
On
December 8, 2006, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement for the
sale of $28,880,000 of 5% convertible subordinated notes due December 7, 2011
(the “5% Convertible Notes”). The 5% Convertible Notes are not
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company filed a
registration statement with respect to the shares acquirable upon conversion of
the 5% Convertible Notes, including an additional number of shares of common
stock issuable on account of adjustments of the conversion price under the 5%
Convertible Notes, (collectively, the “Underlying Shares”) in January, 2007, and
filed Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement in November, 2007, Amendment
No. 2 in April 2008, and Amendments No. 3 and 4 in June 2008; the registration
statement was declared effective on June 18, 2008. The 5% Convertible
Notes bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum, payable in cash semiannually on
June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing June 30, 2007. For
each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company recorded
interest expense related to the 5% Convertible Notes of approximately
$361,000. At the date of issuance, the 5% Convertible Notes were
convertible at the rate of $4.75 per share, subject to certain reset provisions.
At the original conversion price at December 31, 2006, the number of Underlying
Shares was 6,080,000. Since the conversion price was above the market price on
the date of issuance and there were no warrants attached, there was no
beneficial conversion. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, on January 8, 2007 and
January 23, 2007, in conjunction with common stock issuances related to two
acquisitions, the conversion price was adjusted to $4.6706, and the number of
Underlying Shares was thereby increased to 6,183,359, pursuant to the
anti-dilution provisions applicable to the 5% Convertible Notes. On
May 15, 2007, as a result of the issuance of an additional 68,981 shares of
common stock to the Twincraft sellers on account of upward adjustments to the
Twincraft purchase price, and the surrender to the Company of 45,684 shares of
common stock on account of downward adjustments in the Regal purchase price, the
conversion price under the 5% Convertible Notes was reduced to $4.6617, and the
number of Underlying Shares was increased to 6,195,165 shares. This
adjustment to the conversion price resulted in an original debt discount of
$476,873. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB ASC 815-40 which required a retrospective adjustment to the
debt discount. At January 1, 2009, the debt discount was adjusted to
$1,312,500. This amount will be amortized over the remaining term of
the 5% Convertible Notes and be recorded as interest expense in the consolidated
statements of operations. The charge to interest expense relating to the debt
discount for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately
$112,500.
20
The
principal of the 5% Convertible Notes is due on December 7, 2011, subject to the
earlier call of the 5% Convertible Notes by the Company, as follows: (i) the 5%
Convertible Notes could not be called prior to December 7, 2007; (ii) from
December 7, 2007, through December 7, 2009, the 5% Convertible Notes may be
called and redeemed for cash, in the amount of 105% of the principal amount of
the 5% Convertible Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, through the
call date); (iii) after December 7, 2009, the 5% Convertible Notes may be called
and redeemed for cash in the amount of 100% of the principal amount of the 5%
Convertible Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, through the call
date); and (iv) at any time after December 7, 2007, if the closing price of the
common stock of the Company on the NASDAQ (or any other exchange on which the
Company’s common stock is then traded or quoted) has been equal to or greater
than $7.00 per share for 20 of the preceding 30 trading days immediately prior
to the Company’s issuing a call notice, then the 5% Convertible Notes shall be
mandatorily converted into common stock at the conversion price then
applicable. The Company had a Special Meeting of Stockholders on
April 19, 2007, at which the Company’s stockholders approved the issuance by the
Company of the shares acquirable on conversion of the 5% Convertible
Notes.
In the
event of a default on the 5% Convertible Notes, the due date of the 5%
Convertible Notes may be accelerated if demanded by holders of at least 40% of
the 5% Convertible Notes, subject to a waiver by holders of 51% of the 5%
Convertible Notes if the Company pays all arrearages of interest on the 5%
Convertible Notes. Events of default are defined to include change in
control of the Company.
The
payment of interest and principal of the 5% Convertible Notes is subordinate to
the Company’s presently existing capital lease obligations, in the amount of
approximately $2,700,000 as of March 31, 2010, and the Company’s obligations
under its Credit Facility. The 5% Convertible Notes would also be subordinated
to any additional debt which the Company may incur hereafter for borrowed money,
or under additional capital lease obligations, obligations under letters of
credit, bankers’ acceptances or similar credit transactions.
In
connection with the sale of the 5% Convertible Notes, the Company paid a
commission of $1,338,018 based on a rate of 4% of the amount of 5% Convertible
Notes sold, excluding the 5% Convertible Notes sold to members of the Board of
Directors and their affiliates, to Wm. Smith & Co., who served as placement
agent in the sale of the 5% Convertible Notes. The total cost of raising these
proceeds was $1,338,018, which will be amortized through December 7, 2011, the
due date for the payment of principal on the 5% Convertible Notes. The
amortization of these costs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$66,187.
In
connection with the acquisition of Silipos, the Company assumed the obligation
under a capital lease covering the land and building at the Silipos facility in
Niagara Falls, N.Y. that expires in 2018. This lease also contains two five-year
renewal options. As of March 31, 2010, the Company’s obligation under the
capital lease is $2,700,000.
Certain
Factors That May Affect Future Results
Information
contained or incorporated by reference in the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, in other SEC filings by the Company, in press releases, and in
presentations by the Company or its management, contains “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 which can be identified by the Company of forward-looking terminology
such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,”
“could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof,
other variations thereon or comparable terminology or by discussions of
strategy. No assurance can be given that future results covered by the
forward-looking statements will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, those relating to the Company’s financial and
operating prospects, future opportunities, the Company’s acquisition strategy
and ability to integrate acquired companies and assets, outlook and financial
health of customers, and reception of new products, technologies, and pricing.
In addition, such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, our
history of net losses and the possibility of continuing net losses during and
beyond 2010, the current economic downturn and its effect on the credit and
capital markets as well as the industries and customers that utilize our
products, the risk that any intangibles on our balance sheet may be deemed
impaired resulting in substantial write-offs, the risk that the Company may not
be able to maintain a listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market,
the risk that we may not be able to raise adequate financing to fund our
operations and growth prospects, the risk that the clinical study related to our
gel-care scar management products will not be positive, risks associated with
our ability to repay debt obligations, the cost and expense of complying with
government regulations which affect the research, development and formulation of
our products, changes in our relationships with customers, declines in the
business of our customers, the loss of major customers, risks associated with
the acquisition and integration of businesses we may acquire, and other factors
described in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s latest annual report
on Form 10-K and most recently filed Forms 8-K and 10-Q. Also, the
Company’s business could be materially adversely affected and the trading price
of the Company’s common stock could decline if any such risks and uncertainties
develop into actual events. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
following discussion about the Company’s market rate risk involves
forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements.
In
general, business enterprises can be exposed to market risks, including
fluctuation in commodity and raw material prices, foreign currency exchange
rates, and interest rates that can adversely affect the cost and results of
operating, investing, and financing. In seeking to minimize the risks and/or
costs associated with such activities, the Company manages exposure to changes
in commodities and raw material prices, interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates through its regular operating and financing activities. The
Company does not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes, nor does the Company utilize leveraged financial instruments or other
derivatives.
The
Company’s exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates
primarily to the Company’s short-term monetary investments. There is a market
rate risk for changes in interest rates earned on short-term money market
instruments. There is inherent rollover risk in the short-term money instruments
as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk
is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest
rates and business financing requirements. However, there is no risk of loss of
principal in the short-term money market instruments, only a risk related to a
potential reduction in future interest income. Derivative instruments are not
presently used to adjust the Company’s interest rate risk profile.
The
majority of the Company’s business is denominated in United States dollars.
There are costs associated with the Company’s operations in foreign countries,
primarily the United Kingdom and Canada that require payments in the local
currency, and payments received from customers for goods sold in these countries
are typically in the local currency. The Company partially manages its foreign
currency risk related to those payments by maintaining operating accounts in
these foreign countries and by having customers pay the Company in those same
currencies.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, who are, respectively, the Company’s principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010.
22
Changes
in Internal Controls
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting.
23
ITEM 1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
Company received a letter from Langer Biomechanics, Inc. f/k/a Langer
Acquisition Corp. (“Langer Biomechanics”) dated September 17, 2009, alleging the
breach by the Company of certain representations and warranties contained in the
Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 24, 2008 between the Company and Langer
Biomechanics (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), related to the sale of the assets
and liabilities of the Company’s former Langer branded custom orthotics and
related products business. No damages were alleged by Langer
Biomechanics at the time. As a result of Langer Biomechanics’
allegation, a receivable in the amount of $237,500 that was scheduled to be
released to the Company from escrow on October 24, 2009, continued to be held in
escrow in accordance with the terms of the Escrow Agreement dated October 24,
2008, by and among the Company, Langer Biomechanics, and The Bank of New York
Mellon. On February 18, 2010, Langer Biomechanics filed a formal
claim of indemnification. However, since the alleged damages were
below the alleged indemnification threshold in the Asset Purchase Agreement,
Langer Biomechanics agreed to release the remaining amount being held in
escrow. On March 1, 2010, the remaining escrow balance was released
and received by the Company.
Additionally,
in the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to claims and
litigation in the areas of general liability, including claims of employees, and
claims, litigation or other liabilities as a result of acquisitions completed.
The results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict and the Company cannot
provide any assurance that an action or proceeding will not be commenced against
the Company or that the Company will prevail in any such action or
proceeding.
An
unfavorable resolution of any legal action or proceeding could materially
adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock and its
business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
In
addition to the information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the
only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
ITEM 5. OTHER
INFORMATION
Consulting Agreement with
Kanders &
Company, Inc.
On May 5,
2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting
Agreement”) with Kanders & Company, Inc. (“Kanders &
Company”), the sole stockholder of which is Warren B. Kanders, the
Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, and who is the sole manager and
voting member of Langer Partners, LLC, the Company’s largest stockholder. The
Consulting Agreement provides that Kanders & Company will act as the
Company's non-exclusive consultant to provide the Company with strategic
consulting and corporate development services for a term of one year.
Kanders & Company will receive, pursuant to the agreement, an annual
fee of $300,000 in addition to separate compensation for assistance, at the
Company’s request, with certain transactions. The Company has also agreed to
provide Kanders & Company with indemnification protection which
survives the termination of the Consulting Agreement for six years, and extends
to any actual or wrongfully attempted breach of duty, neglect, error or
misstatement by Kanders & Company alleged by any claimant. The
Consulting Agreement replaces a previous agreement for similar consulting
services (the “Prior Agreement”), pursuant to which Kanders & Company
received an annual fee of $300,000 and the indemnification protection described
above. The Prior Agreement expired on November 12, 2007, but during
2008 and 2009, Kanders & Company continued to render consulting services to
the Company and the Company continued to pay for such services in accordance
with the terms of the expired Prior Agreement, as approved by the Board of
Directors. The foregoing summary of the terms of the Consulting
Agreement between the Company and Kanders & Company is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Consulting Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit
10.1 to this report.
24
Agreement with W. Gray
Hudkins
On
May 5, 2010, in recognition of the agreement of W. Gray Hudkins’, the
Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, to forego $200,000 of the
$300,000 base compensation for fiscal year 2010 to which he is entitled under
his Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2007 (the “Employment
Agreement”), between Mr. Hudkins and the Company, the Company agreed to waive
for 2010 the requirement of the Employment Agreement that Mr. Hudkins devote his
full business time and energies to the business and affairs of the
Company. Instead, during 2010, Mr. Hudkins agrees to devote such
business time and energies to the business and affairs of the Company as the
Company and Mr. Hudkins will agree upon, from time to time, as necessary and
appropriate. The foregoing summary of the terms of the agreement
between the Company and Mr. Hudkins is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this
report.
25
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Description
|
||
10.1
|
Consulting
Agreement, dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and Kanders &
Company, Inc.
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement,
dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and W. Gray
Hudkins.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section
1350).
|
26
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
PC
GROUP, INC.
|
||
Date:
May 5, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/
W. GRAY HUDKINS
|
W.
Gray Hudkins
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date:
May 5, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ KATHLEEN
P. BLOCH
|
Kathleen
P. Bloch
|
||
Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief
Financial
Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial
Officer)
|
27
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Consulting
Agreement, dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and Kanders &
Company, Inc.
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement,
dated May 5, 2010, between the Company and W. Gray
Hudkins.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(a)).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17
CFR 240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section
1350).
|
28