11 GOOD ENERGY INC - FORM S-1

Attached files

file	filename
EX-10.3 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-3.htm
EX-3.3 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex3-3.htm
EX-2.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex2-1.htm
EX-3.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex3-1.htm
EX-5.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex5-1.htm
EX-2.2 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex2-2.htm
EX-3.2 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex3-2.htm
EX-3.4 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex3-4.htm
EX-10.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-1.htm
EX-10.5 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-5.htm
EX-23.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex23-1.htm
EX-10.6 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-6.htm
EX-21.1 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex21-1.htm
EX-10.2 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-2.htm
EX-10.8 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-8.htm
EX-10.7 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-7.htm
EX-10.4 - 11 GOOD ENERGY INC	c60913_ex10-4.htm

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2010

Registration No. _______

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) __________________


Delaware	2860	26-0299315


(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	I.R.S. Employer Identification Number

4450 Belden Village Street N.W., Suite 800, Canton, OH 44718, Phone 330-492-3835

(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Frederick C. Berndt, 4450 Belden Village Street N.W., Suite 800, Canton, OH 44718

330-492-3835

(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)

Copies to:

Steven Morse, Esq.

Morse & Morse PLLC.

1400 Old Country Road, Suite 302

Westbury, New York 11590

phone (516) 487-1446

facsimile (516) 487-1452

Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (Check one):


Large Accelerated Filer	o	Accelerated Filer	o
Non-accelerated Filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of each Class of Securities to be Registered	Amount to be Registered	Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Security (1)			Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price			Amount of Registration Fee(3)


Common stock, $.0001 par value (1)	3,282,936		$	.74		$	2,429,373		$	173.21
Common Stock, $.0001 par value (2)	686,239			4.50			3,088,076			220.18


Total	3,969,175					$	5,517,449		$	393.39



(1)	In accordance with Rule 457, the aggregate offering price of shares of common stock of 11 Good Energy, Inc. is estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fees payable pursuant hereto, as determined in accordance with Rule 457(f)(2), based upon the book value of the company’s common stock as of December 31, 2009 (i.e. the latest practicable date). These shares of common stock are currently outstanding and are being offered for sale by selling security holders.

(2)	In accordance with Rule 457, the aggregate offering price of shares of common stock of 11 Good Energy, Inc., issuable under certain warrants, is estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fees payable pursuant hereto, as determined in accordance with Rule 457(g), based upon the exercise price of outstanding warrants of $4.50 per share.

(3)	Based upon a multiplication factor of $.00007130.

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling shareholders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.


Subject to Completion
Preliminary Prospectus dated April 16, 2010

PROSPECTUS

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC.

The Resale of Up to 3,969,175 shares of Common Stock

The selling price of the shares will be determined by market factors at the time of their resale.

This prospectus relates to the resale by the selling security holders of up to 3,969,175 shares of common stock, including shares underlying certain warrants. The selling security holders may sell the stock from time to time in the over-the-counter market, if and when established, at the then prevailing market prices or in negotiated transactions.

We will receive no proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling security holders, though we will receive proceeds from the private exercise of the related warrants. The warrants are not included in this prospectus.

Our common stock has no public trading market at this time.

Investing in the common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should invest in the common stock only if you can afford to lose your entire investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus.

Please read this prospectus carefully. It describes our company, products and business activities. Federal and state securities laws require that we include in this prospectus all the important information that you will need to make an investment decision.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus to make your investment decision. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. The selling security holders are not offering these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front page of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this Prospectus is April 16, 2010

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following is a glossary of terms unique to our industry:

Low Sulfur Diesel #2 (LSD #2) - #2 grade diesel fuel processed to reduce Sulfur emissions. This is a carbon based fuel, made from crude oil, and is the current standard of diesel fuel used to power trucks, trains, and ships.

Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel #2 (ULSD #2) - #2 grade diesel fuel processed to remove a greater level of sulfur than the LSD #2 above. ULSD #2 is to replace LSD #2 as the government standard sulfur level of diesel fuel used for trucking, rail, and marine transportation. This product is currently being produced, but its use is currently not a requirement. This fuel will be more expensive than LSD #2 and requires additives to increase lubricity lost in the Sulfur reduction process.

Traditional #2 Diesel Fuel- either LSD #2 or ULSD #2.

Bio-fuel – fuel derived from bio based sources. This category of fuel includes biodiesel, ethanol and G2 Diesel.

biodiesel – a form of Bio-fuel produced by combining a form of feedstock oil (Soybean, Palm, etc) and ethanol/methanol alcohol and catalyst. This fuel can power diesel engines in the same manner as traditional #2 grade diesel fuel.

G2 Diesel - a form of Bio-fuel produced by combining soybean oil, ethanol alcohol and a catalyst. This method of bio-fuel manufacturing is based on the company’s proprietary manufacturing process as described herein.

Blended biodiesel – a blend of biodiesel (which depending upon the context may refer to our G2 Diesel or other competitors’ biodiesel) and traditional #2 grade diesel fuel.

B5 – a blend of fuel with 5% G2 Diesel or biodiesel and 95% traditional #2 grade diesel fuel.

B20 – a blend of fuel with 20% G2 Diesel or biodiesel and 80% traditional #2 diesel fuel.

B100 – 100% G2 Diesel or biodiesel.

Ethanol – alcohol type generally derived from bio-based sources such as corn.

Methanol – Toxic Alcohol type generally derived from petroleum sources.

Catalyst – proprietary blend of materials used in the manufacturing process.

Gel Point (Pour Point) - temperature where fuel ceases to flow properly in fuel systems.

EU-27 – represents a group of 27 industrial countries in the European Union.

The following Table of Contents has been designed to help you find important information contained in this prospectus. We encourage you to read the entire prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	SECTION	PAGE
1.	Prospectus Summary	4
2.	Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward Looking Statements	7
3.	Risk Factors	8
4.	Use of Proceeds	18
5.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis	20
6.	Description of Business	29
7.	Legal Proceedings	38
8.	Market for Common stock and Related Shareholder Matters	38
9.	Management and Directors	40
10.	Ownership of Securities by Beneficial Owners and Management	43
11.	Executive Compensation	44
12.	Director Compensation	48
13.	Certain Transactions	49
14.	Selling Security Holders	51
15.	Plan of Distribution	58
16.	Description of Securities	59
17.	Indemnification Disclosure For Securities Act Liabilities	60
18.	Experts	61
19.	Legal Matters	61
20.	Where You Can Find More Information	61
21.	Index to Financial Statements

No dealer, salesperson, or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares offered hereby and only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of the date of this prospectus.

Through and including _______, 2010 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.

Market and Industry Data and Forecasts

This prospectus includes estimates of market share and industry data and forecasts that we obtained from industry publications, surveys or others sources. Industry publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources, nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in the common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section and the financial statements and related notes.

Overview

11 Good Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation formed on May 23, 2007 for the purposes of developing, testing, manufacturing and distributing bio-fuel with energy related plans and pursuits relying on the commercialization of our proprietary fuel product, G2 Diesel, as discussed below.

We have developed many contacts and contracts in our business, created an experienced Management team and have cash and cash equivalents of $4.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, we have finalized the principal development of our proprietary process and have designed, built and currently operate a fuel manufacturing facility.

In October of 2007, our company completed the purchase of an existing biodiesel manufacturer, 11 Good’s Energy, LTD (“11 Good’s”), a limited liability company (becoming our wholly owned subsidiary), formed in the State of Ohio in February 2006. Historically, our subsidiary has been a development stage company, which has primarily engaged in research activities to develop a proprietary manufacturing process to produce bio-fuel for diesel applications.

Principal Products

G2 Diesel, our primary product, is a form of Bio-fuel produced by combining soybean oil, ethanol alcohol and a catalyst. This method of bio-fuel manufacturing is based on our proprietary manufacturing process as described herein. Our manufacturing process also produces a crude glycerin by-product. Our goal is to market and distribute, and improve as we may be able, our G2 Diesel product first nationally and later internationally. Energy is one of our nation’s primary concerns due to a combination of health, commercial and even national security considerations, and the concern includes development of cleaner, cost effective, and safer fuels.

Marketing and Distribution

As of December 31, 2009, we have contracts with vendors, advisors and professionals nationally assisting us in our business, but have no firm contracts or backlog of orders from customers to purchase our G2 Diesel fuel or our crude glycerin by-product described herein. Through our past and current testing programs, we are building relationships with trucking fleets, marine diesel and rail companies requiring locomotive diesel fuel. The company’s sales and marketing focus consists of building lasting relationships with major transportation companies to provide large quantities of G2 Diesel. We expect order flow to occur once these companies complete their testing programs, which has proven to be part of the process to reach a contract. We can provide no assurances that Management’s plans will be realized, that there will be sufficient order flow of G2 Diesel fuel to support our intended operations or that we will be able to operate profitably and/or on a positive cash flow basis in the future.

We will attempt to sell our crude glycerin by-products to manufacturers of cosmetics, toiletries, pharmaceuticals and food products, since we do not have the capability of refining the glycerin. Our ability to sell this by-product will be limited to those manufacturers who require crude glycerin and have the capability to refine it. We can provide no assurances that we will be successful in selling our crude glycerin by-product; among other reasons, our major focus will be the sale of our G2 Diesel. See Risk Factors.”

Competitive Advantages

Though we may face competition from larger more established providers with greater resources and penetration, Management believes competitive advantages of the company’s G2 Diesel are multi-faceted. Our proprietary manufacturing process produces a clean natural fuel that testing has shown, reduces harmful emissions produced by diesel engines. The company’s production process is cost efficient, it produces no waste water and it does not require natural gas. (Natural gas is a costly component used by others in manufacturing biodiesel duel.)

Risk Factors

We are subject to a variety of risks which may be adverse to our company, our business, and aspects of the ownership, and sale of our securities. There is no assurance we will succeed in our plans. See Risk Factors starting on page 8.

Facilities and Production Capacity

We maintain our corporate office at 4450 Belden Village St., Suite 800, NW, Canton, OH 44718, and our telephone number is 330-492-FUEL. In November 2009, we completed construction of our bio-fuel manufacturing facility or plant in Magnolia, Ohio. The facility is currently configured to produce between 4.6 million and 6.4 million gallons of G2 Diesel per year with an ability to expand capacity as the market for G2 Diesel fuel grows. From November 1, 2009 to April 1, 2010, we produced an approximate total of 150,000 gallons of G2 Diesel at our plant.

This year we plan efforts to increase sales and also locate a site to purchase or lease land to build a second production facility. The costs of the new production facility could exceed our cash reserves, with the actual cost of this new facility depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, the location and cost of the land, demolition costs of existing facilities (if any) on the site, environmental concerns (if any) and the size of the new plant. Further, as a development stage corporation with limited sales to date, we will need our existing cash resources to support our intended sales efforts from our existing plant in Magnolia, Ohio as well as other working capital needs. While Management anticipates generating operating cash flow over the next 12 months, which could be substantial, we cannot provide any assurances that this will occur. Accordingly, we will likely require additional financing to support the purchase and construction of a second facility and to supplement our operations. We cannot assure are plans, including establishment of the additional plant, will succeed. See “Risk Factors.”

Recent Financings

Over a period of approximately two years, we borrowed principal of $7,930,000, which became due and payable on June 30, 2009, subject to each note holder’s right to convert the principal and accrued interest thereon into common stock and warrants of the company at a 15% discount to the per share offering price of the next established equity raise. Of the $7,930,000, $6,498,708 of principal and accrued interest thereon were converted into 2,548,513 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 3,228,523 shares of common stock, each exercisable at $2.55 per share and we redeemed a total of $1,967,916 in principal debt for cash plus accrued interest therein. This prospectus includes the resale of a portion of these conversion shares.

From August 2009 through March 2010, the company completed an equity financing of $12,052,000 from the sale of 4,017,333 shares of common stock and Class A warrants to purchase 2,008,667 shares of common stock, exercisable at $4.50 per share. We also issued agency warrants to purchase 686,239 shares, exercisable at prices ranging from $2.55 to $4.50 per share. This prospectus covers the resale of the shares issuable upon exercise of the agency warrants as well as a portion of the shares sold in the equity financing. The shares issued by us are the subject of this prospectus.

The Offering


Common stock Offered	3,969,175 shares

Common stock Outstanding:	19,976,560 shares

	The foregoing summary of our outstanding securities does not reflect outstanding options to purchase 500,000 common shares exercisable at $3.00 per share or outstanding warrants to purchase 5,923,713 shares of common stock exercisable into common shares, at prices ranging from $2.55 per share to $4.50 per share, 686,239 shares of which are part of the shares to be offered by selling shareholders.

Preferred Stock Outstanding;	11,000,000 shares

	The Preferred stock has the right to vote together with Common stockholders, but has no other dividend, conversion, liquidation or other preferential rights over common stock.

Offering Price	The shares being registered hereunder are being offered by the selling security holders from time to time at the then current market price.

Dividend Policy	We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Use of Proceeds	The shares offered herein are being sold by the selling security holders and as such, we will not receive any of the proceeds of the offering, except from the possible cash exercise of outstanding warrants.

Material Risk Factors	This offering involves a high degree of risk, elements of which include, without limitation, we are a development stage company with limited operating history or profitability; we expect the need to raise substantial additional capital and there is no assurance that we will be successful in this regard; we are dependent upon the market acceptance of our G2 Diesel fuel products; technology changes could render our G2 Diesel fuel products uncompetitive or obsolete; and we face material competition. See “Risk Factors.”

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus and documents incorporated by reference contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to our future operations. They estimate the occurrence of future events and are not based on historical facts. Forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as:


	•	believes
	•	intends
	•	projects
	•	forecasts
	•	predicts
	•	may
	•	will
	•	expects
	•	estimates
	•	anticipates
	•	probable
	•	continue

This list is not comprehensive. Similar terms, variations of those terms, and the negative of those terms may also identify forward-looking statements.

The risk factors discussed in this prospectus are cautionary statements. They identify some of the factors that could cause actual results to be significantly different from those predicted in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements were compiled by us based upon assumptions it considered reasonable. These assumptions are subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, forecasted and actual results will likely vary, and these variations may be material.

There can be no assurance that the statements, estimates, and projections contained in this prospectus will be achieved. Thus, we make no representation or warranty as to their accuracy or completeness. In addition, we cannot guarantee that any forecast in this prospectus will be achieved.

These forward-looking statements were compiled as of the date of this prospectus. We do not intend to update these statements, except as required by law. Therefore, you should evaluate them by considering any changes that may have occurred after the date these forward-looking statements appear.

We cannot guarantee the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. Therefore, while these forward-looking statements contain our best good faith estimates as of the date of this prospectus, we urge you and your advisors to review these forward-looking statements, to consider the assumptions upon which they are based, and to ascertain their reasonableness.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves major risks. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that there are various risks, including those described below. You should carefully consider these risk factors together with all of the other information included in this prospectus before you decide to purchase shares of our common stock. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information presented in this prospectus, in evaluating us and our business. Any of the following risks, as well as other risks and uncertainties, could harm our business and financial results and cause the value of our securities to decline, which in turn could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

We have a limited operating history, and our business may not be as successful as we envision.

We are currently in an early stage of our current business plan. We have limited operating history with respect to the construction and operation of biodiesel refineries for our own use. Our limited operating history makes it difficult for potential investors to evaluate our business. Therefore, our proposed operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the initial expenses, challenges, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the formation of any new business, as well as those risks that are specific to the biodiesel industry in general. Investors should evaluate an investment in our company in light of the problems and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies attempting to develop markets for new products, services and technologies. Despite best efforts, we may never overcome these obstacles to achieve financial success.

Our business is speculative and dependent upon the implementation of our business plan, as well as our ability to enter into agreements with third parties for necessary financing, the provision of necessary feedstock sources, engineering, procurement and construction services and the sale and distribution of our biodiesel fuel on terms that will be commercially viable for us. There can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful or result in revenue or profit. There is no assurance that we will earn significant revenues or that our investors will not lose their entire investment.

Possible need for substantial additional financing.

This year we plan to locate a site to purchase or lease land to build a second production facility. While we have cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4,900,000 at December 31, 2009, the costs of a new production facility could exceed this amount, with the actual cost of this new facility depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, the location and cost of the land, demolition costs of existing facilities (if any) on the site, environmental concerns (if any) and the size of the new plant. Further, as a development stage corporation with limited sales to date, the company will need its existing cash resources to support our intended sales efforts from our existing plant in Magnolia, Ohio. Accordingly, we will likely require substantial additional financing to support the purchase and construction of a second facility and to support operations. We can provide no assurances the company will be able to obtain adequate financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

We have yet to attain profitable operations and because we will need additional financing to fund our activities, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue to operate as a going concern is fully dependent upon our ability to obtain sufficient financing to continue our development and operational activities. The ability to achieve profitable operations is in direct correlation to our ability to raise sufficient financing. It is important to note that even if the appropriate financing is received, there is no guarantee that we will ever be able to operate profitably or derive any significant revenues from our operation. We will be required to raise additional financing to fully implement our entire business plan.

There is no guarantee that we will ever operate profitably or even receive positive cash flows from full operations.

Our products may not be accepted by the biodiesel industry.

The company’s proprietary process is new to the biodiesel industry and management believes that it will change the biodiesel production process; all while using 95 to 99% renewable agricultural sources. However, we can provide no assurances that our G2 Diesel products will be accepted by the biodiesel industry or be blended in with other diesel fuel products.

We have no firm contracts to purchase our G2 Diesel or crude glycerin by-product and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to sell our products at or near its stated capacity, if at all.

As of December 31, 2009, we have no firm contracts or backlog of orders to purchase our G2 Diesel fuel or our crude glycerin by-product. We are currently building relationships with trucking fleets, marine diesel and rail companies requiring locomotive diesel fuel. We can provide no assurances that there will be sufficient order flow of G2 Diesel fuel or glycerin by-product to support our intended operations or that we will be able to operate profitably and/or on a positive cash flow basis in the future.

Our lack of diversification beyond the renewable bio-energy industry may increase our risk.

We expect our primary source of revenue will come from renewable energy assets that generate cash flow from the sale of biodiesel, bio-ethanol and by products from the bio-fuels production process. Any diminution in the value of our assets or decrease in operating revenues could negatively affect our ability to become profitable. Further, the illiquid nature of the assets we own and intend to purchase could jeopardize our ability to satisfy our working capital needs or impair our ability to meet any debt obligations that may become due.

Our G2 Diesel has been tested by Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (SARTA) and Wheeling Lake Erie Railroad and it may be tested by other entities. We can provide no assurances that our customers will be satisfied with test results.

The Stark Area Regional Transit Authority in Northeastern Ohio has tested our G2 Diesel fuel. The Wheeling Lake Erie Railroad company, a short line rail with track located in Ohio and West Virginia has also tested our G2 Diesel fuel. While management believes that the foregoing entities are satisfied with their initial

testing results of our G2 Diesel, we can provide no assurances that additional testing by SARTA, Wheeling Lake Erie Railroad and other entities will lead to satisfactory results from the prospective of our clients.

Our business is not diversified and we are dependent upon the operation of our plant in Magnolia, Ohio to produce biodiesel and glycerin for sale.

Our success depends largely on our ability to profitably operate our biodiesel plant. We do not have any other lines of business or other sources of revenue if we are unable to operate our biodiesel plant and manufacture biodiesel and its by-product, crude glycerin. If we are forced to continue to operate at significantly less than capacity or cease operations at our biodiesel plant for any reason, our ability to produce sales revenue would be adversely affected. In such an event, our stockholders could lose some or all of their investment.

Volatility in pricing, supply and demand could harm our ability to generate sales and profits.

Our revenues will be greatly affected by the price at which we can sell our biodiesel and crude glycerin by-product. These prices can be volatile as a result of a number of factors over which we have no control. These factors include overall supply and demand, level of government support, and the availability and price of competing products, such as diesel fuel. Increased production of biodiesel may lead to lower prices. Any lowering of biodiesel prices may negatively impact our ability to generate profits. Over supply of our crude glycerin by product could result in us being forced to pay third parties to accept our crude glycerin by-product.

Technological advances could cause our plant to become uncompetitive or obsolete.

It is possible that technological advances in the processes and procedures for processing biodiesel could make the processes and procedures that we utilize at our plant less efficient or obsolete. Our Magnolia, Ohio plant is a single-purpose facility and has no use other than the production of biodiesel and crude glycerin. Much of the cost of the plant is attributable to the cost of production technology which may be impractical or impossible to update. If we are unable to adopt or incorporate technological advances, our biodiesel production methods could be in the future less efficient than those of our competitors. If our competitors develop, obtain or license technology that is superior to ours or that makes our technology obsolete, we may be required to incur significant costs to enhance or acquire new technology so that our biodiesel production remains competitive. Alternatively, we may be required to seek third-party licenses, which may be unavailable and/or could result in significant expenditures. These costs could negatively impact our financial performance by increasing our operating costs and reducing our net income.

Intense competition in the biodiesel industry may affect our ability to sell biodiesel at profitable prices.

We operate in a very competitive environment. We face competition for capital, labor, management, feedstock (such as soy oil) and other resources. Some of our competitors may be substantially larger than us and may have significantly greater name recognition and financial, sales and marketing, technical, and other resources. These competitors may also have more established distribution channels and may be able to respond more rapidly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to biodiesel development, promotion and sale of their products. In 2009, approximately 500 million gallons of biodiesel were produced in the United States. We expect that additional biodiesel producers will enter the market if the demand for biodiesel increases. We may not be able to compete successfully or such competition may reduce our ability to generate the profits necessary to operate our plant.

Competition from other sources of fuel and diesel fuel lubricity additives may decrease the demand for our biodiesel.

The EPA has issued regulations to reduce the amount of sulfur in diesel fuel in order to improve air quality. The removal of sulfur from diesel fuel reduces its lubricity which must be corrected with fuel additives, such as biodiesel which has inherent lubricating properties. Our biodiesel plant is expected to compete with producers of other diesel additives having similar lubricity values as biodiesel, such as petroleum-based lubricity

additives. Many major oil companies produce these petroleum-based lubricity additives and strongly favor their use because they may be used in lower concentrations than biodiesel. In addition, much of the infrastructure in place is for petroleum-based additives. As a result, petroleum-based additives may be more cost-effective than biodiesel. Due to such competition, it may be difficult to market our biodiesel, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

Because our activities may involve the use of hazardous materials, we may be subject to claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of these materials that could be time consuming and costly.

If we use biological and hazardous materials in a manner that causes injury, we may be liable for damages. Our research and development activities may involve the controlled use of potentially harmful biological materials as well as hazardous materials or chemicals. We cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from the use, storage, handling or disposal of these materials. In the event of contamination or injury, we could be held liable for damages that result, and any liability could exceed our resources. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations could be significant. Our proven practices when handling these materials has shown to mitigate these risks.

Cold weather may cause biodiesel to gel, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to successfully market our biodiesel.

In colder temperatures, lower biodiesel blends are recommended to avoid fuel system plugging. This may cause the demand for our biodiesel in northern markets to diminish during the colder months. The tendency of biodiesel to gel in colder weather may also result in long-term storage problems. At low temperatures, fuel may need to be stored in a heated building or heated storage tanks. This may result in a decrease in demand for our product in colder climates due to increased storage costs.

Excess production of glycerin may cause the price of glycerin to decline, thereby adversely affecting our ability to generate revenue from the sale of glycerin.

As biodiesel production has increased, the glycerin market has become increasingly saturated, resulting in significant declines in the price of glycerin. Any further excess glycerin production capacity may limit our ability to market our glycerin by-product, and even result in us paying for the disposal of glycerin, which would negatively impact our revenues.

There may not be an adequate supply of feedstock to supply the demands of the biodiesel industry, which could threaten the viability of our plant.

There may not be an adequate supply of feedstock to supply the demand of the food products and biodiesel industries. Consequently, the price of feedstock may rise to the point where it threatens the viability of our pricing model. If we experience a sustained period of high feedstock costs, such pricing may significantly limit our ability to market our product.

Increased insurance risk could negatively affect our business

Insurance and surety companies may take actions that could negatively affect our business, including increasing insurance premiums, requiring higher self-insured retentions and deductibles, requiring additional collateral or covenants on surety bonds, reducing limits, restricting coverages, imposing exclusions, and refusing to underwrite certain risks and classes of business. Any of these would adversely affect our ability to obtain appropriate insurance coverage at reasonable costs which would have a material adverse effect on our proposed business.

The loss of key management personnel could harm the company’s business and prospects.

The company’s success may be dependent upon its ability to retain the services of its key executives and founder, in particular, the services of Frederick C. Berndt, Chief Executive Officer, Gary R. Smith, the company’s Chief Operations Officer, and Daniel T. Lapp, the company’s Chief Financial Officer. The ability of the company to pursue its business strategy effectively will also depend upon, among other factors, the successful recruitment and retention of additional highly skilled and experienced managerial, marketing, engineering and technical personnel. There can be no assurance that the company will be able to retain or recruit such personnel.

Loss of or ineligibility for favorable tax benefits for biodiesel production could hinder our ability to operate at a profit and reduce the value of our units.

The biodiesel industry and our business are assisted by various federal biodiesel incentives such as the subsidy for small agri-biodiesel producers. These tax incentives for the biodiesel industry may not continue, or, if they continue, the incentives may not be at the same level. The elimination or reduction of tax incentives to the biodiesel industry could reduce the market for biodiesel, which could reduce profits by making it more costly or difficult to produce and sell biodiesel.

Our operating subsidiary is subject to a court order preventing the use of our products from being sold as a specific purpose additive.

Our operating subsidiary, a consultant to the company and an employee are subject to a court order dated May 22, 2006 and are enjoined as follows:


•	Defendants shall not directly or indirectly for five years from the date of this (court ordered) entry blend or manufacture bio-based or petroleum based lubricants, greases, fuel conditioners, additives, and cleaners (fuels and glycerin and glycerol are excluded);
•	Defendant 11 Good’s shall not blend or manufacture lubricants, greases, fuel conditioners, additives, and cleaners using glycerin and glycerol for a period of 2 years from the date of this (court ordered) entry;
•	Defendant Harnar shall never for his lifetime disclose Plaintiff’s (i.e. Renewable Lubricants, Inc.) formulas and processes for bio-based or petroleum based lubricants, greases, fuel conditioners, fuel and additives, and fuel cleaners to any of the other Defendants or any entity or person; and
•	Defendants shall not sell bio-based lubricants, greases, fuel conditions, fuel additives, and fuel cleaners for two years from the date of this (court ordered) entry unless such products are purchased from Plaintiff.

We can provide no assurances that the sale of products, as fuel and which is taxed as fuel; will not be determined by a court of law to be an additive or otherwise in violation of the Court Order. Any such violation of the Court Order as determined by a court of law could materially and adversely affect our operations.

Business expansion poses numerous risks that could limit the company’s growth and financial prospects.

The company’s management intends to aggressively expand the company’s business as capital resources permit. The company may not be successful in managing any future growth or raising additional capital. In order to manage this expansion and to grow in the future, the company will need to expand or enhance management, manufacturing, research and development and sales and marketing capabilities. The company may not be able to hire the management, staff or other personnel required to do so. As the company grows it may not be able to install adequate control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and current or planned operational systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support future operations or new acquisitions. Difficulties in installing and implementing new systems, procedures and controls may significantly burden management and internal resources.

Our operations are subject to various regulatory schemes, including environmental regulations, and failure to comply with such regulations could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

All phases of designing, constructing and operating biodiesel production facilities present environmental risks and hazards. We are subject to environmental regulation implemented or imposed by a variety of federal, state and municipal laws and regulations as well as international conventions. Among other things, environmental legislation provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills and discharges, as well as emissions of various substances produced in association with biodiesel fuel operations. Legislation also requires that facility sites be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed in such a way that would satisfy applicable regulatory authorities. Compliance with such legislation can require significant expenditures and a breach may result in the imposition of fines and penalties, some of which may be material. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner we expect may result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines, penalties and liability, as well as potentially increased capital expenditures and operating costs. The discharge of pollutants into the air, soil or water may give rise to liabilities to governments and third parties, and may require us to incur costs to remedy such discharge.

Failure to comply with government regulations could subject us to civil and criminal penalties require us to forfeit property rights and may affect the value of our assets or our ability to conduct our business. We may also be required to take corrective actions, including, but not limited to, installing additional equipment, which could require us to make substantial capital expenditures. We could also be required to indemnify our directors, officers and employees in connection with any expenses or liabilities that they may incur individually in connection with regulatory action against them. These could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future terrorist attacks or related disasters may impact the company’s profitability and ability to operate.

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, have had an adverse impact on various regions of the US and on a wide range of industries. The terrorist attacks, the allied military response and subsequent developments may impact the US and global economies and may adversely affect our future results of operations. We are unable to determine at this time the extent of the impact and whether these events will negatively affect the operations or profitability of the company. In the future, civil unrest, fears of economic recession, war and additional acts of terrorism may continue to impact the US and global economies and financial markets and could adversely affect the business of the company.

The obstacles to procurement and enforcement of our intellectual property that we have or may develop and proprietary rights could harm our competitive position by allowing competitors access to our proprietary technology that we may develop and to introduce competing products. Costly litigation may be necessary to protect our intellectual property rights. We may be subject to claims alleging the violation of the intellectual property rights of others.

Our products and related intellectual property rely primarily on a combination of trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret laws and other methods to protect our proprietary rights. As of the date of this Prospectus, we have pending international (PCT) and Canadian patent applications, and we are considering additional filings in the future including, but not necessarily limited to, national stage entry applications based on the international application. We place considerable importance on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for our technologies, products and/or processes. Our success will depend at least in part on our ability, and the ability of any of our licensors, to obtain and keep proprietary rights in our products and processes, which permit us to exclude others from taking commercial advantage of what we consider to be our inventions, and prevent others from using our trade secrets; if we fail to secure patents and other intellectual property rights that cover our products and technologies, we may be unable to derive as much financial return on commercialization of our products as we would if such rights were obtained. The standards which the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) utilizes in deciding whether to grant patents can change, which may result in us being unable to determine the type and extent of any future patent claims that will be issued to us or to our licensors in the future, if any patent claims are issued at all, and the fees associated with filing and prosecuting patent applications may increase significantly, which might result in us incurring higher expenses and adversely affect our intellectual property strategy.

The commercial success of our products might also be affected by the intellectual property rights of others. We intend to operate in a way that does not result in willful infringement of patent, trade secret or other intellectual property rights of other parties. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that a claim of infringement will not be asserted against us or that any such assertion will not result in a judgment or order requiring us to obtain a license in order to make, use, or sell our products. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us in the future with respect to any products. Any such claims or litigation, with or without merit, could be costly and a diversion of management’s attention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Adverse determinations in such claims or litigation could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

A third party may claim that we are using inventions in which it has patent rights and may go to court to stop us from engaging in our normal operations and activities, such as research, development and the sale of any future products. Such lawsuits are expensive and would consume time and other resources. There is a risk that the court will decide that we are infringing the third party’s patents and order us to stop the infringing activities. In addition, there is a risk that a court will order us to pay the other party damages for having infringed their patents. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the prevailing patent owner would offer us a license so that we could continue to engage in activities claimed by the patent, or that such a license, if made available to us, could be acquired on commercially acceptable terms. In addition, third parties may, in the future, assert other intellectual property infringement claims against us with respect to our products, technologies or other matters.

International patent protection is particularly uncertain, and if we are involved in opposition proceedings in foreign countries, we may have to expend substantial sums and management resources.

Patent law outside the United States is even more uncertain than in the United States and is currently undergoing review and revision in many countries. Further, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as United States laws. We may participate in opposition proceedings to determine the validity of our foreign patents or our competitors’ foreign patents, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our efforts.

We are subject to government regulations creating burdensome costs.

Various aspects of our operations are or may become subject to federal, state or local laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. Costs arising out of any regulatory developments could be time-consuming, expensive and could divert management resources and attention and, consequently, could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.

We may suffer losses from product liability claims if our products cause harm.

Any of our products that we may sell and develop in the future could cause adverse events and could lead to product liability lawsuits. If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our products. Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks, which are inherent in the testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of bio-fuel products. We may not be able to avoid product liability claims. A successful product liability claim brought against us may cause us to incur substantial liabilities and, as a result, our business plan may fail.

Our securities have no public market.

Our common stock are “restricted securities” and may not be sold and/or transferred except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption under the 1933 Act and applicable state or “blue sky” laws. There is currently no market for any of our common stock. We are utilizing our “best efforts” to have a broker-dealer file a 15c2-11 application with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for the purpose of listing our common stock on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board. We can provide no assurances that our common stock will become available for quotation and trading on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board or that an established pubic market will even develop for our common stock. In the event that no public market develops for our common stock, then investors may have to hold on to their investment in our securities for an indefinite period of time. There are no current or future plans to attempt to establish a public market for the company’s outstanding warrants.

We have never declared or paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon the our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, applicable contractual restrictions and other such factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

If an established trading market for our common stock does develop, trading prices may be volatile.

In the event that an established trading market develops in the future, of which there can be no assurances given, the market price of our shares of common stock may be based on factors that may not be indicative of future market performance. Consequently, the market price of our common stock may vary greatly. If a market for

our common stock develops, there is a significant risk that our stock price may fluctuate dramatically in the future in response to any of the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:


	•	variations in our quarterly operating results;
	•	announcements that our revenue or income/loss levels are below analysts’ expectations;
	•	general economic slowdowns;
	•	changes in market valuations of similar companies;
	•	announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts; and/or
	•	strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments.

Our common stock may be considered to be a “penny stock” and, as such, the market for our common stock may be further limited by certain Commission rules applicable to penny stocks.

To the extent the price of our common stock may in the future have a public market price below $5.00 per share or we have a net tangible assets of $5,000,000 or less, our common shares will be subject to certain “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Commission. Those rules impose certain sales practice requirements on brokers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000). For transactions covered by the penny stock rules, the broker must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale. Furthermore, the penny stock rules generally require, among other things, that brokers engaged in secondary trading of penny stocks provide customers with written disclosure documents, monthly statements of the market value of penny stocks, disclosure of the bid and asked prices and disclosure of the compensation to the brokerage firm and disclosure of the sales person working for the brokerage firm. These rules and regulations adversely affect the ability of brokers to sell our common shares in the public market should one develop and they limit the liquidity of our shares of common stock.

The perception of future sales of registered securities by selling security holders could lead to a decline in the price, if any, of our common stock.

Future sales of substantial amounts of our currently outstanding common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, particularly due to the 3,969,175 shares requested for resale by selling security holders, could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. We cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of our common stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, will have on the market price of our stock.

The price of common stock may fluctuate significantly, which could result in substantial losses for our stockholders and subject us to litigation.

The market price, if any, of our common stock also may be adversely impacted by broad market and industry fluctuations regardless of our operating performance, including general economic and technology trends. The various stock markets in general have, from time to time, experienced extreme price and trading volume fluctuations, and the market prices of technology companies such as ours have been extremely volatile. In addition, some companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. We may be involved in securities class action litigation in the future. This litigation often results in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract our management.

As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls for financial reporting. We will be required to document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires regular management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and eventually, a report by our independent registered public accountants addressing these assessments. During the course of our testing, we may identify deficiencies which we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight will be required. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, we may need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in a timely fashion. Our estimated costs associated with going public could exceed $200,000 per year.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholder, except for funds received from the exercise of warrants held by certain of the selling stockholder, if and when exercised. We plan to use the net proceeds received from the exercise of any warrants, if any, for working capital and general corporate purposes. The actual allocation of proceeds realized from the exercise of these securities will depend upon the amount and timing of such exercises, our operating revenues and cash position at such time and our working capital requirements. There can be no assurances that any of the outstanding warrants will be exercised.

MARKETING INFORMATION

Holders

As of April 16, 2010, there were approximately 327 holders of our common stock.

Dividends

We have not paid dividends on our common stock, and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We have no compensation plans to issue equity securities. However, on July 22, 2009, we granted 5 of our Directors options to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of Common Stock exercisable at $3.00 per share over a term of three years ending July 22, 2012.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

From May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through April 14, 2010, there have been 925,000 shares repurchased pursuant to transactions described under “Certain Transactions.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Since May 23, 2007 (date of inception), we had limited private sales of our securities, summarized as follows:

Date of
Sale

Title of
Security

Number Sold

Consideration
Received and
Description of
Underwriting or
Other Discounts to
Market Price or
Convertible Security,
Afforded to
Purchasers

Exemption from
Registration
Claimed

If Option,
Warrant or
Convertible
Security, terms of
exercise or
conversion

May 2007

Common stock

10,000,000 Shares

$1,000; no commissions paid.

Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506.

Not applicable.

May 2007

Preferred Stock

11,000,000

$1,000; no Commissions paid

Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506.

Not applicable.

2007 -
2009

Debentures

$7,930,000 Debentures

$643,700 of finder’s fees and commissions paid

Rule 506.

Notes are convertible at $2.55 per share. Each note holder also received one warrant exercisable at $2.55 per share and expiring June 30, 2012 for each common share issued or issuable upon conversion of the note.

2009 and
2010

Common stock and warrants

4,017,333 shares and 2,008,667 Warrants

$12,052,000; $1,205,200 commission paid

Rule 506

Warrants exercisable at $4.50 per share through June 30, 2012

2009 and
2010

Common stock and warrants

2,548,513 shares; 3,228,523 warrants

Conversion of debt totaling $6,498,708; no commissions paid

Section 3(a)(9)

Warrants exercisable at $2.55 per share through June 30, 2012.

2010

Placement Agent Warrants

686,239 Warrants

Services rendered

Section 4(2)

Five year Warrants exercisable from $2.55 to $4.50 per share.

2009

Common stock options

500,000 Options

Services rendered; no commissions paid

Section 4(2)

Three year options exercisable at $3.00 per share.

Each of the certificates issued or to be issued representing the securities in the transactions listed above bears or will bear a restrictive legend permitting the transfer thereof only in compliance with applicable securities laws. The recipients of securities in each of the transactions listed above represented to us or will be required to represent to us their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof. All recipients had or have adequate access, through their employment or other relationship with our company, the selling agent and/or through other access to information provided by our company, to information about our company.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. All statements contained herein that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements regarding anticipated future capital requirements, our future plan of operations, our ability to obtain debt, equity or other financing, and our ability to generate cash from operations, are based on current expectations. These statements are forward-looking in nature and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results.

Overview

11 Good Energy, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed on May 23, 2007 for the purposes of developing, testing, manufacturing and distributing bio-fuel with energy related plans and pursuits relying on the commercialization of our proprietary fuel product, G2 Diesel, as discussed below.

We have developed many contacts and contracts in our business, created an experienced Management team, and have cash and cash equivalents of $4.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, we have finalized the principal development of our proprietary process, and have designed, built and currently operate a fuel facility.

On October 23, 2007, we completed the purchase of an existing biodiesel manufacturer, 11 Good’s Energy, LTD, a limited liability company (becoming our subsidiary), formed in the State of Ohio in February 2006. Historically, our subsidiary has been a development stage company, which has primarily engaged in research activities to develop a proprietary manufacturing process to produce bio-fuel for diesel applications.

In early 2008, we began construction on a new manufacturing facility at the location of our operating subsidiary in Magnolia Ohio (Magnolia Plant). In June 2008, we began placing tanks and constructing the infrastructure of the Magnolia Plant. Unfortunately, the industry experienced changes in fire suppression regulations due to an explosion at a competitor’s Bio-diesel manufacturing facility in Ohio. The new regulations required us to invest over $1,500,000 in additional infrastructure not anticipated in the original capital expenditure budget. We had to cease operations from November 2008 to October 2009 in order to secure the financing and make the necessary changes to the fire suppression system and design of the Plant.

Acquisition of 11 Good’s Energy, LTD

On October 23, 2007, we completed the purchase of 11 Good’s Energy, LTD. As a result of this transaction, all of the assets, liabilities and proprietary technology of 11 Good’s were transferred to us by the former partners of 11 Good’s in exchange for $500,000 in cash, $223,390 in assumed liabilities and 4,285,714 shares of common stock of the company. The assets and liabilities of 11 Good’s were recorded at fair market value at the time of acquisition. 11 Good’s is our sole subsidiary and operations and the management of 11 Good’s and us are the same. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of us and our wholly-owned subsidiary and all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

We performed a valuation analysis of the technology and the consideration given for the acquired proprietary technology as of the purchase date and recorded $2,942,555 in the form of non-compete agreements, core developed technology and in-process research and development.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and disclosures on the date of the financial statements. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and other assumptions as the basis for making judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We are required to make judgments based on historical experience and future expectations, as to the expectations of goods billed to our customers. These judgments are required to assess the propriety of the recognition of revenue based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605-10, “Revenue Recognition,” and related guidance. We make such assessments based on the following factors: (a) customer-specific information, and (b) historical experience for issues not yet identified.

Inventory Valuation. We are required to make judgments based on historical experience and future expectations, as to the realizability of our inventory. We make these assessments based on the following factors: (a) existing orders and usage, (b) age of the inventory, and (c) historical experience.

Property and Equipment. We are required to make judgments based on historical experience and future expectations, as to the realizability of our property and equipment. We made these assessments based on the following factors: (a) the estimated useful lives of such assets, (b) technological changes in our industry, and (c) the changing needs of our customers.

Fair Value of Intangible Assets. We have adopted Statement of Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 805-10 (“ASC 805-10”). ASC 805-10 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period.

We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 805-10 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for its stock based compensation under ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” using the fair value based method. Under this method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. This guidance establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges it equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

There were no employee stock options and employee stock purchases granted to employees and directors during the period from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2008. On July 22, 2009, the company granted 500,000 stock options to outside directors at an exercise price of $3.00 per share. We recorded the fair value of $200,205 as current period compensation expense as a result of this transaction. These options

are for a period of three years and are fully vested. There were no unvested options outstanding as of the date of adoption of FASB ASC Topic 718.

We use the fair value method for equity instruments granted to non-employees (if any) and will use the Black-Scholes model for measuring the fair value of options, if issued. The stock based fair value compensation is determined as of the date of the grant or the date at which the performance of the services is completed (measurement date) and is recognized over the vesting periods.

Results of Operations

By virtue of the our purchase of 11 Good’s, which became its sole operations, the company is considered to be in the development stage in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 915 – Development Stage Enterprises. Since its inception, the company has devoted substantially all of its time to raising capital, obtaining financing, and research and development activities. Furthermore, the company has had a total of $177,934 of revenues and has had recurring losses since its inception.

The following table sets forth certain selected condensed consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated:


	Year ended December 31,
	2009			%		2008			%
Revenue	$	84,218		100	%	$	76,730		100	%
Cost of goods sold		75,252		89	%		73,904		96	%


Gross profit		8,966		11	%		2,826		4	%

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3,580,934		>100	%		1,131,133		>100	%
Research and development		238,208		>100	%		30,373
Depreciation and amortization		384,402		>100	%		362,259		>100	%

Total operating expenses:		4,203,544					1,523,765

Net loss from operations		(4,194,578	)				(1,520,939	)

Other income/expense:
Interest, net		(2,789,029	)	>100	%		(868,568	)	>100	%
Other income		109,049		>100	%		-


Net loss	$	(6,874,558	)	>100	%	$	(2,389,507	)	>100	%

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

The company generated revenues of $84,218 in 2009 compared to $76,730 in 2008. The increase in revenues in 2009 of $7,488, or 9.8% is consistent with the testing platform continued by the company in 2009.

Cost of goods sold was $75,252 and $73,904 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, or 89% of revenues for the year ended 2009 and 96% of revenues for the year ended 2008. Costs of goods sold primarily consist of the procurement and transportation of soybean oil, ethanol and other raw materials used in the manufacture of G2 Diesel; including payroll costs associated with labor, depreciation of manufacturing equipment, manufacturing facilities expense, insurance costs and other operating costs directly related to production. The overall increase in cost of goods sold of $1,348 or 1.8% for 2009 is due to the company’s increase in sales volume. We expect margins to improve once we have sales contracts in place after the testing programs are complete.

Gross profit was $8,966 in 2009 as compared to $2,826 in 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues was 10.7% and 3.7% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Over the past two years and throughout the company’s testing phase with potential customers, gross margins have continued to be a small percentage of total revenues. In addition; gross margin percentages will vary from period to period depending upon the extent of fuel testing with potential customers and the pricing offered by the company. The gross margin for 2009 and 2008 is not necessarily indicative of the margins that may be realized in future periods.

Research and development costs increased $238,208 in 2009 as a result of the testing and product development programs initiated in 2009 compared to $30,373 in 2008. We have increased efforts to develop new feedstock alternatives and improve fuel manufacturing techniques. Depreciation and amortization increased by $22,143 or 6.1%. The increase is primarily due to the capitalization of $2.5 million to Leasehold Improvements and Manufacturing Equipment, which began depreciating in November 2009.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses of $3,580,934, exceeded revenues by $3,496,716. Such costs include, among others, payroll and related expenses, insurance costs and occupancy costs. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $2,449,801 in 2009 is primarily related to an increase in the number of employees in the administrative offices, increases in sales management and other payroll related expenses and an increase in the number of consultants and advisors


•	More specifically, our payroll and related costs increased by $771,149 due to hiring a new Chief Operating Officer, Plant manager, Accounting Controller, and administrative staff.
•	Payments to consultants and Board of Directors common stock from the Company’s CEO treated for accounting purposes as donated capital of $531,000
•	Additional consulting and service provider fees such as advisory, legal and accounting of $846,339

Research and development expenses of $238,208 included pilot processes and costs associated with product development in 2009 compared to $30,373 in 2008.

Depreciation and amortization of $384,402 in 2009 compared to $362,259 in 2008. The increase represents additional property, plant and equipment placed in service in 2009 of approximately 2 million.

Interest expense, net was $2,789,029 in 2009 as compared to $868,568 in 2008 or a net increase of $1,920,461. The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in the amortized debt discount and interest relating to our convertible notes payable. In 2009, we issued additional convertible notes payable in the amount of $4,830,000, for a total for the convertible notes to $7,930,000.

Net loss was $(6,874,558) in 2009 compared to $(2,389,507) in 2008. Basic and fully diluted net loss per share for 2009 and 2008 was $(.48) and $(.17), respectively. Basic and fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding for 2009 and 2008 were 14,361,659 and 14,285,714, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009, the company has raised $7,930,000 by issuing notes payable convertible into Common Stock, bearing 8% interest per annum. These Notes (including principal and accrued interest thereon) became convertible at a price of $2.55 per share (the “Conversion Price”) based upon a 15% discount to the company’s equity raise which was completed at an offering price of $3.00 per share between August 2009 and March 2010. In addition to the number of conversion shares to be delivered to

each Holder of this Note, upon conversion of the Principal Amount and accrued interest thereon, the company also delivered Unclassified Warrants expiring June 30, 2012 to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of Conversion Shares. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the company had outstanding $35,000 and $2,667,721 respectively, of these convertible notes.

The company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4.9 million at December 31, 2009. Cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4,242,950; this would primarly used to fund the aforementioned losses of the company of $6,874,558 as compared to a loss of $2,389,507 in 2008. Cash used in investing activities was $3,241,868, which included the purchase of property and equipment for 1,971,697, the purchase of treasury stock for $450,000, the purchase of securities held for sale for $1,028,123, also included are proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale of $204,752. Cash provided by financing activities was $12,354,567 and consisted of proceeds of $4,855,000 from the private placement of Convertible Debentures and $9,473,023 in proceeds from common stock subscription, net of repayments of convertible notes of $1,695,000 and loans to related party of $278,456.

The company had cash and cash equivalents of $0 at December 31, 2008. Cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $486,382. Cash used in investing activities was $781,848, which consisted entirely of the purchase of property and equipment. Cash provided by financing activities was $1,158,703 and consisted of net proceeds of $1,540,678 from the private placement of Convertible Debentures, loans to related party of $297,654 and $25,000 of a commercial note payable. In addition, the company made a payment of $84,321 to retire the commercial note payables assumed as a result of the company’s acquisition of 11 Good’s Energy, LTD.

As of March 15, 2010, the company converted $6,498,708 of Convertible notes payable to Common Stock at a price of $2.55 per share, or 2,548,513 shares and warrants to purchase 3,228,523 shares of Common Stock and the entire remaining balance of convertible notes was redeemed, with principal and accrued interest paid to each redeeming note holder.

As of March 15, 2010, the company had raised $12,052,000 through the sale of its Common Stock at a price of $3.00 per share, for a total of 4,017,333 shares, resulting in net proceeds to us of $10,847,000.

We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to finance our accounts receivable and inventories, and from the need to fund our current obligations and capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements will be current cash, cash generated from operations, and raising additional capital either from the sale of equity, other securities or debt. In 2010, the company plans to locate a site to purchase or lease land to build a second production facility. We estimate this facility to cost approximately $6,000,000. While we have cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4,900,000 at December 31, 2009, the costs of a new production facility exceeds this amount, with the actual cost of this new facility depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, the location and cost of the land, demolition costs of existing facilities (if any) on the site, environmental concerns (if any) and the size of the new plant. Further, as a development stage corporation with limited sales to date, the company will need its existing cash resources to support our intended sales efforts from our existing plant in Magnolia, Ohio. Accordingly, we will likely require additional financing to support the purchase and construction of a second facility and to supplement our operations. We can provide no assurances that the company will be able to obtain adequate financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

Recent Accounting Developments

In June 2009, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance now codified under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 105-10, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity of GAAP. ASC Topic 105-10 explicitly recognizes rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under federal securities law and authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Upon adoption of this guidance under ASC Topic 105-10 supersedes all then existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non

SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became non-authoritative. The guidance under ASC Topic 105-10 became effective for the company as of July 1, 2009. References made to authoritative FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated to the applicable codification section.

In accordance with Release No. 8760 of the Securities Act of 1933, commencing with the company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the company will become subject to the requirement to include in its annual report management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting. This assessment will require the company to document and test its internal control procedures in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The company’s independent registered public accountants will be required to attest to the company’s assessment of internal controls for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.

Effective November 1, 2007, the company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10-25, as required. As of a result of implementing ASC 740-10-25, there has been no adjustment made to the company’s consolidated financial statements and the adoption of ASC 740-10-25 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure. The objective of ASC 820 is to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and to expand disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of ASC 820 are effective for fair value measurements made in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of ASC 820-10-55 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 820-10-55, which delayed the effective date of ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 820-10-55 did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 825-10-15 which addresses accounting for registration payment arrangements. ASC 825-20-15 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with ASC 450-10, Contingencies. ASC 825-20-15 further clarifies that a financial instrument subject to a registration payment arrangement should be accounted for in accordance with other applicable generally accepted accounting principles without regard to the contingent obligation to transfer consideration pursuant to the registration payment arrangement. For registration payment arrangements and financial instruments subject to those arrangements that were entered into prior to the issuance of ASC 825-20-15, this guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 825-10 which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. ASC 825-10 is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Board’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. ASC 825-10 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007, although earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 805 – Business Combinations which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. ASC 805 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 730 – Research and Development which requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development (R&D) activities be deferred and amortized over the period that the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. ASC 730 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 810 – Consolidations which will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be re-characterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheet. ASC 810 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 808 – Collaborative Arrangements which defines collaborative arrangements and requires collaborators to present the result of activities for which they act as the principal on a gross basis and report any payments received from (made to) the other collaborators based on other applicable authoritative accounting literature, and in the absence of other applicable authoritative literature, on a reasonable, rational and consistent accounting policy is to be elected. ASC 808 also provides for disclosures regarding the nature and purpose of the arrangement, the entity’s rights and obligations, the accounting policy for the arrangement and the income statement classification and amounts arising from the agreement. ASC 808 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will be applied as a change in accounting principle retrospectively for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 815 - Derivatives and Hedging. ASC 815 is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under ASC 815 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 350 which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. We are required to adopt ASC 350 on November 1, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The guidance in ASC 350 for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after adoption, and the disclosure requirements shall be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASC 350 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic 470-20-15 which requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt)

and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 on a retroactive basis. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC 815-40 which provides guidance on determining what types of instruments or embedded features in an instrument held by a reporting entity can be considered indexed to its own stock for the purpose of evaluating the first criteria of the scope exception in FASB ASC 810-10-15 (Prior authoritative literature: paragraph 11(a) of SFAS 133). The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855-10 which establishes general standards for accounting and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are available to be issued (“subsequent events”). More specifically, FASB ASC 855-10 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition in the financial statements, identifies the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. FASB ASC 855-10 provides largely the same guidance on subsequent events which previously existed only in auditing literature. The guidance under ASC Topic 855-10 became effective for the company as of June 30, 2009.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of our company. Our company and its representatives may from time to time make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including statements contained in this report and other company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in our reports to stockholders. Statements that relate to other than strictly historical facts, such as statements about the company’s plans and strategies and expectations for future financial performance are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “will” and other similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are and will be based on management’s then current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance, and speak only as of their dates. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of events and circumstances that could affect our financial performance or cause actual results to differ materially from estimates contained in or underlying our forward-looking statements.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business Development

11 Good Energy, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed on May 23, 2007 for the purposes of manufacturing and distributing bio-fuel. In October of 2007, we completed the purchase of an existing bio-fuel, 11 Good’s Energy, LTD, a Limited Liability company, formed in the state of Ohio in February 2006. Historically, our subsidiary has been a development stage company, which has primarily engaged in research activities to develop a proprietary manufacturing process to produce bio-fuel for diesel applications. We have developed many contacts in our business but have achieved limited sales to date.

Description of the Traditional Biodiesel Industry and Markets

The biodiesel industry is relatively new and unknown. In 2009, the biodiesel industry reported that it produced an estimated 500 million gallons of biodiesel, constituting only a fraction of the 60 billion gallon per year U.S. diesel fuel market. Due to the recent economic downturn and other factors, some plants are currently closed and many do not currently operate at full capacity.

Biodiesel, in general, is a high-lubricity, clean-burning alternative fuel produced from domestic, renewable resources and is primarily used in compression ignition (diesel) engines. Biodiesel is comprised of mono-alkyl esters of long chain fatty acids derived from vegetable oils or animal fats. A chemical process called transesterification removes the free fatty acids from the base oil and creates the desired esters. Transesterification is the reaction of vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol, such as methanol or ethanol, in the presence of a catalyst. Biodiesel can be used in neat (pure) form or blended with petroleum-based diesel. Biodiesel that is in neat form is typically designated in the marketplace as B100. The “100” indicates that the fuel is 100% biodiesel. Biodiesel is frequently blended with petroleum-based diesel. When biodiesel is blended, it is typically identified in the marketplace according to the percentage of biodiesel in the blend. For example, “B20” indicates that 20% of the fuel is biodiesel and 80% is petroleum-based diesel. These characteristics are true for the company’s G2 Diesel as well.

Principal Products and Facilities

The principal products we produce at our plant located in Magnolia, Ohio are bio-fuel (G2 Diesel) and crude glycerin. In 2010, we plan to locate a site to purchase or lease land to build a second production facility. The costs of a second production facility could be in excess of our cash reserves, with the actual cost of this new facility depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, the location and cost of the land, demolition costs of existing facilities (if any) on the site, environmental concerns (if any) and the size of the new plant. Further, as a development stage corporation with limited sales to date, we will likely need our existing cash resources to support our intended sales efforts from our existing plant in Magnolia, Ohio. Accordingly, we will likely require financing to support the purchase and construction of a second facility and to supplement our operations. See “Risk Factors.”

Our Magnolia plant primarily requires propane and electricity to operate. We expect that electricity and propane will be our prime energy cost. In our opinion, our plant configuration and processes have a minimal environmental impact on the surrounding region.

G2 Diesel compared to Traditional Biodiesel

Proprietary Manufacturing Process

Our proprietary manufacturing process uses soybean oil, ethanol alcohol and a catalyst. Our processing method differs from the traditional forms of producing biodiesel. Other producers also use a form of animal or vegetable based oil; however, they also use the toxic petroleum derived methanol during processing, which is used in the traditional method of producing biodiesel. Our proprietary process is new to the biodiesel industry. Our manufacturing process reduces toxic emissions and eliminates wastewater production associated with conventional or traditional biodiesel production. We use no water to wash the fuel in their manufacturing process.

Pricing of G2 Diesel

Management believes that our G2 Diesel commands a pricing premium when compared to other biodiesel products. The selling price per gallon is determined by the cost of soybean oil, ethanol and catalyst. We build our pricing model based primarily on these raw material commodity prices. We have developed our pricing model to trend with the feedstock prices. When our feedstock prices rise or fall, the pricing model adjusts to preserve the desired margins. Soybean Oil has historically trended with petroleum oil. So our selling price would increase or decrease in the same manner as #2 diesel fuel. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to maintain our profit margins and increase the sales price of our G2 Diesel at times of rising feedstock costs. See “Risk Factors.”

Blending of G2 Diesel with traditional 2 diesel fuel

G2 Diesel blends especially well with traditional #2 diesel fuel. The viscosity of the two fuels are very similar and allow the two fuels to splash blend, which means the fuel blends with no induced agitation. This is an important attribute of our fuel that differentiates the G2 Diesel product from the rest of the Biodiesel industry. Many of our competitor’s products do not have a viscosity similar to diesel and therefore does not blend well with diesel.

We intend to sell our product as a 99 – 100% bio-fuel and do not plan to blend our product with any traditional #2 diesel fuel at the company’s facilities. We are prohibited by court order from selling our G2 Diesel as an additive. See “Risk Factors.” We expect that customers may on their own accord choose between a 2% – 20% blend with traditional #2 diesel fuel, with a limit of 5% G2 Diesel blend for on road use. The customer will be responsible for blending their traditional #2 diesel fuel with the G2 Diesel purchased from us and pumping the blended fuel to their vehicle or vessel. This can be done by the end user and/or their current fuel distributor. Our G2 Diesel fuel will be sold as fuel in this regard and will be subject to applicable fuel taxes.

Consistency of feedstock

We currently use soybean oil as our feedstock. We believe that the quality control procedure for our feedstock is essential to the production of a quality fuel. Other producers in the industry will use multiple feedstock of differing quality, mainly to minimize their material costs. This can lead to an inconsistent finished fuel product which performs differently with each change of materials. The control and consistency of feedstock quality is a key attribute to making a high quality fuel.

The effect of cold flow on biodiesel markets.

Biodiesel produced from traditional means using various feed stocks have different cold flow properties, depending on the type of feedstock used in its manufacture. “Cold flow” refers to a fuel’s ability to flow easily at colder temperatures and is an important consideration in producing and blending biodiesel for use in colder climates. The pour point for a fuel is the temperature at which the flow of the fuel stops. Therefore, a lower pour point temperature means the fuel flows better in colder temperatures. The pour point of 100% traditional soy oil based biodiesel is approximately 27°F to 30°F. Based on recent independent testing conducted by a third party

laboratory, the pour point of 100% G2 Diesel is -9F. G2 Diesel’s pour point provides a great advantage in cold climate markets.

Current Production and Markets

In November 2009, we completed construction of our bio-fuel manufacturing facility in Magnolia, Ohio. The facility is currently configured to produce between 4.6 million and 6.4 million gallons of G2 Diesel with an ability to expand capacity as the market grows for the company’s proprietary fuel. From November 1, 2009 to April 1, 2010, we produced an approximate total of 150,000 gallons of G2 Diesel at our plant.

Testing and performance of product

Our G2 Diesel has been tested by the Stark Area Regional Transit Authority (SARTA) in North Eastern (Canton) Ohio. SARTA tested the fuel in their buses and transport vehicles at a 10 to 15% blend of our G2 Diesel with traditional #2 diesel fuel and recorded their results. SARTA’s report shows an increase of 1 to 3 miles per gallon; which depending on the vehicle type translates to a 15 to 25% increase in fuel efficiency. The most significant change that drivers noticed was that a bus equipped with an automatic transmission using a blend of G2 Diesel had more power going up hills and would up-shift while ascending a hill. SARTA’s same buses using regular diesel fuel do not up-shift, in some circumstances there was a difference of two gears, third gear as opposed to first gear, on the same hill. The drivers also experienced less engine noise and a more pleasant smell in the cab of the bus.

Over the past year, we also conducted an independent customer trial with Wheeling Lake Erie Railroad, testing our G2 Diesel in their locomotives. The test uses a 20% blend of G2 Diesel with traditional #2 diesel fuel. The test shows that the locomotives have experienced a reduction in overall fuel consumption. This trial will conclude in the spring of 2010, when Wheeling and Lake Erie railroad will conduct a component tear down and inspection of the diesel engines of the locomotives tested.

The Timken company, a manufacturer of roller bearings and specialty steels, has agreed to trial G2 Diesel starting in mid-March 2010. G2 Diesel will be tested for performance efficiency and wear reduction capabilities.

It is important to note that testing arrangements, discussions and meetings, as noted above, do not represent we have, with such third parties, entered into agreements for the sale of our product and no assurance can be given that such efforts will either bear good testing results nor achieve contracts for sales.

Biodiesel Markets

Bio-fuel is primarily used as fuel for diesel engines. It is produced using renewable resources and provides environmental advantages over petroleum-based diesel fuel. Bio-fuel is frequently used as fuel in transport trucks, ships, trains, in farming activities and in many government vehicles. Government legislation that seeks to encourage the use of renewable fuels could lead to an expansion of the market for bio-fuel in the future. Additional markets may become available as a result of growing environmental concerns by American consumers as well as an increased awareness of energy security and the United States’ ability to supply its own fuel needs.

Wholesale Market / Biodiesel Marketers. The wholesale market involves selling biodiesel directly to fuel blenders or through biodiesel marketers. Fuel blenders purchase B100 from biodiesel production plants, mix it with petroleum diesel fuel according to specifications, and deliver a final product to retailers. There are few wholesale biodiesel marketers in the United States.

Retail Market. The retail market consists of biodiesel distribution primarily through fueling stations to transport trucks and “jobbers,” which buy products from manufacturers and sell them to retailers for the purpose of supplying farmers, maritime customers and home heating oil users. Retail level distributors include oil companies, independent station owners, marinas and railroad operators. The biodiesel retail market is still in its very early stages as compared to other types of fuel. The present marketing and transportation network must expand significantly in order for us to effectively market our biodiesel to retail users. Areas requiring expansion include, but are not limited to:


	•	additional rail capacity;
	•	additional storage facilities for biodiesel;
	•	increases in truck fleets capable of transporting biodiesel within localized markets;
	•	expansion in refining and blending facilities to handle biodiesel; and
	•	growth in service stations equipped to handle biodiesel fuels.

Substantial investments required for these infrastructure changes and expansions may not be made or they may not occur on a timely basis. Any delay or failure in making the changes to or expansion of infrastructure could hurt the demand or prices for biodiesel, impede delivery of biodiesel, impose additional costs on or otherwise negatively affect our proposed results of operations or financial position.

Government/Public Sector. The government has increased its use of biodiesel since the implementation of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, amended in 1998, which authorized federal, state and public agencies to use biodiesel to meet the alternative fuel vehicle requirements of the Energy Policy Act.

We anticipate that the Renewable Fuel Standard may increase demand for biodiesel, as it sets a minimum usage requirement for biodiesel and other types of biomass-based diesel. However, there can be no assurance that the Renewable Fuel Standard will increase demand for biodiesel.

Competitive Advantages & Infrastructure

The energy industries are highly competitive. There are significantly larger companies that have larger market penetration than our own. We believe, however, we have certain advantages that could be considered to contrast us from our competition, though sales do not currently reflect the advantages.

Competition from Other Fuel Sources and Additives

The biodiesel industry is in competition with the traditional # 2 diesel fuel segment of the petroleum industry. The price of diesel reached record high prices in July 2008 of approximately $4.70 per gallon for No. 2 ultra low sulfur diesel, and thereafter declined sharply to approximately $2.04 as of March 23, 2009. In addition, other more cost-efficient domestic alternative fuels may be developed and displace biodiesel as an environmentally-friendly alternative. If a new fuel is developed to compete with biodiesel; it may be difficult to market our biodiesel, which could result in the loss of some or all of our ability to operate profitably.

Renewable diesel is another form of diesel with which we may be required to compete. Renewable diesel has characteristics similar to that of petroleum-based diesel fuel and can be co-processed at traditional petroleum refineries from vegetable oils or animal fats mixed with crude oil through a thermal de-polymerization process. According to a February 2009 report from the DOE’s Alternative Fuels & Advanced Vehicles Data Center, renewable diesel is close to full commercialization as manufacturers continue to modify and expand research and development.

We also expect to compete with producers of other diesel additives made from raw materials other than soybean oil having similar lubricity values as biodiesel, such as petroleum-based lubricity additives. Some major oil companies produce these petroleum-based lubricity additives and strongly favor their use because they may be used in lower concentrations than biodiesel. In addition, much of the infrastructure in place is for petroleum-based additives. As a result, petroleum-based additives may be more cost-effective than biodiesel. Therefore, it may be difficult to market our biodiesel as a lubricity additive.

Competition with Other Biodiesel Producers

We face competition for market share, capital, labor, management, feedstock (such as soy oil) and other resources. In 2009, approximately 500 million gallons of biodiesel was reported to be produced in the United States. Biodiesel plants are currently operating throughout the United States. We expect that additional biodiesel producers will enter the market if the demand for biodiesel increases.

We must compete with other biodiesel producers not just in the sale of our bio-fuel, but also in the acquisition of soybean oil and other raw materials. A majority of plants, and many of the largest producers, utilize soybean oil. This may change over time as high soybean oil prices are encouraging biodiesel producers to find ways to utilize alternative and less costly types of feedstock. For example, research within the bio-fuel industry is currently underway to develop technology to produce biodiesel from alternative feedstocks such as algae.

Some of our competitors have soy-crushing facilities and are thus not reliant upon third parties for their feedstock supply. As a result, we face a competitive challenge from biodiesel plants owned and operated by the companies that supply our feedstock. Such vertical integration provides certain competitors with greater control over their feedstock supplies, thereby providing them with a competitive advantage over plants like ours that do not have soy-crushing capabilities, especially as prices and competition for soybean oil and other feedstocks have increased.

Currently, there are other active biodiesel plants in Ohio. Because of recent adverse economic conditions and other factors affecting the biodiesel industry, a few plants in Ohio and many across the country have either curtailed production or stopped production completely. Nevertheless, Management believes that with an increase in the public’s desire to use bio-fuels, the current environment allows a new product like G2 Diesel to obtain a market share in a struggling industry.

Primary Co-product — Glycerin

Glycerin is the primary co-product of the biodiesel production process and equals approximately 10% of the quantity of biodiesel produced. It is highly stable under typical storage conditions, compatible with a wide variety of other chemicals and comparatively non-toxic. Glycerin possesses a unique combination of physical and chemical properties that are used in a large variety of products. It is an ingredient or processing aid in cosmetics, toiletries, personal care products, pharmaceuticals and food products. In addition, new uses for glycerin are frequently being discovered and developed due to its versatility. Many of these uses, however, require refined glycerin. Our plant only produces crude glycerin and does not have the capability to refine glycerin.

Glycerin Demand and Markets

We are not capable of refining the crude glycerin produced at our plant. Prices for refined glycerin are typically higher than prices for crude glycerin. In early February 2009, the Jacobsen Biodiesel Bulletin reported average refined glycerin prices of 27 to 35 cents per pound compared with an average of 4 to 7 cents per pound for crude glycerin. Relatively higher refined glycerin prices have prompted some of our competitors to expand their glycerin refining capacities. These biodiesel producers have a competitive advantage over plants like ours that do not have glycerin refining capabilities.

Glycerin Competition

It is estimated that every million gallons of biodiesel produced adds approximately another one hundred thousand gallons of crude glycerin into the market. Over the past few years, as biodiesel production has increased, the glycerin market has become increasingly saturated. Excess glycerin production capacity may limit our ability to market our glycerin co-product, and we may even be forced to pay to dispose of our glycerin if prices. Low glycerin prices may also limit our ability to generate revenues through the sale of our by-product. This may negatively affect the profitability of our business.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

Soybean Oil Costs and Supply

The cost of feedstock is the largest single component of the cost of biodiesel production. We expect that soybean oil will continue to be our primary feedstock unless we are able to successfully procure and process alternative feedstock and achieve the desired performance of the fuel. As a result, our pricing per gallon has been, and will likely continue to be, particularly susceptible to changes in the price of soybean oil. The twenty-year average price for soybean oil is approximately $0.23 per pound. However, in June 2008, soybean oil reached a new high of $0.62 per pound. Soybean oil prices have since fallen, but remain volatile. The March 2009 Oil Crops Outlook report prepared by the USDA states that the February 2009 average soybean oil price was $0.29 cents per pound. The charts below show U.S. soybean oil prices over the past ten years and for each month in the 2007-2008 marketing year:

U.S. Soybean Oil Prices


Marketing Year	Price (cents)
1997/98		25.80
1998/99		19.90
1999/00		15.60
2000/01		14.15
2001/02		16.46
2002/03		22.04
2003/04		29.97
2004/05		23.01
2005/06		23.41
2006/07		31.02
2007/08		52.03
2008/09		28.5 - 31.5 ⁽¹⁾



(1) Preliminary Price. Data provided by USDA, Oil Crops Outlook Report, March 12, 2009.

We believe that continued increases in the price of soybean oil will result in us increasing the selling price of G2 Diesel. G2 Diesel pricing has historically trended with petroleum oil pricing. If crude oil should increase by 10%, our pricing model will generate a very similar percentage increase in G2 Diesel price, as the result of a similar percentage increase in soybean oil. Management believes that the incremental cost increase to the customer of a 5% blend of G2 Diesel with traditional #2 diesel fuel does not exceed the benefits in fuel efficiency and maintenance costs. We have explored the possibility of acquiring technology for or otherwise obtaining other feedstocks for our G2 Diesel production process. However, our research thus far has determined that the performance characteristics are best achieved through the use of soybean oil. We expect to purchase our soybean requirements from multiple available sources in the United States.

Ethanol and Catalyst Costs and Supply

The production of biodiesel at our plant requires ethanol and a catalyst. We have experienced no difficulties in obtaining adequate supplies of ethanol or our catalysts used to produce finished products. As we have in the past, we expect to purchase our ethanol and a catalyst from multiple qualified sources.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

Our proprietary products and processes are protected primarily by a combination of trademark, patent and trade secret rights.

As of the date of this Prospectus, we have pending international (PCT) and Canadian patent applications, and we are considering additional filings in the future including, but not necessarily limited to, national stage entry applications based on the international application. We place considerable importance on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for our technologies, products and/or processes. Our success will depend at least in part on our ability, and the ability of any of our licensors, to obtain and keep property rights in our products and processes, which permit us to exclude others from taking commercial advantage of what we consider to be our inventions, and prevent others from using our trade secrets; if we fail to secure patents and other intellectual property rights that cover our products and technologies, we may be unable to derive as much financial return on commercialization of our products as we would if such rights were obtained. The standards which the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) utilizes in deciding whether to grant patents can change, which may result in us being unable to determine the type and extent of any future patent claims that will be issued to us or to our licensors in the future, if any patent claims are issued at all, and the fees associated with filing and prosecuting patent applications may increase significantly, which might result in us incurring higher expenses and adversely affect our intellectual property strategy.

The commercial success of our products might also be affected by the intellectual property rights of others. We intend to operate in a way that does not result in willful infringement of the patent, trade secret or other intellectual property rights of other parties. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that a claim of infringement will not be asserted against us or that any such assertion will not result in a judgment or order requiring us to obtain a license in order to make, use, or sell our products. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us in the future with respect to any products. Any such claims or litigation, with or without merit, could be costly and a diversion of management’s attention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Adverse determinations in such claims or litigation could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Should third parties file patent applications, or be issued patents, claiming technology also claimed by us in pending applications or in issued patents, we may be required to participate in interference proceedings in the USPTO to determine priority of invention. An adverse outcome in an interference proceeding could require us to cease using the technology, to license rights from prevailing third parties, and/or to lose exclusive rights in our products or processes. There is no guarantee that any prevailing party would offer us a license or that such a license, if made available to us, could be acquired on commercially acceptable terms.

We maintain confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, affiliates, customers and business partners. Any confidentiality agreements required of our employees and that we enter into with other parties may not provide adequate protection for our future trade secrets, know-how or other confidential information or prevent any unauthorized use or disclosure or the unlawful development by others. If any of our confidential intellectual property is disclosed, our business may suffer. In addition, certain of our present and future scientific and management personnel may have been previously employed by other companies where they conducted research in areas similar to those that we now pursue. As a result, we could be subject to allegations of trade-secret violations and other claims relating to the intellectual property rights of these companies.

Government Regulations

Renewable Fuel Standard

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 created the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) which required refiners to use 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2012. The Energy Independence and Security Act (“EISA”) expanded the existing Renewable Fuel Standard to require the use of 9 billion gallons of renewable fuel in 2008, increasing to 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel by 2022. The EISA requires that 600 million gallons of renewable fuel used in 2009 must come from advanced biofuels other than corn-based ethanol, such as ethanol derived from cellulose, sugar or crop residue and biomass-based diesel (which includes biodiesel and renewable diesel), increasing to 21 billion gallons in 2022. The EISA further includes a requirement that 500 million gallons of biodiesel and biomass-based diesel fuel be blended into the national diesel pool in 2009, gradually increasing to one billion gallons by 2012. However, in November 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced that the RFS program in 2009 will continue to be applicable to producers and importers of gasoline only. This means that the 500 million gallons of biomass-based diesel required by the RFS, as amended by the EISA, does not have to be blended into U.S. fuel supplies in 2009. This is due to the fact that the regulatory structure of the original RFS program does not provide a mechanism for implementing the EISA requirement for the use of 500 million gallons of biomass-based diesel. The EPA intends to propose options and develop mechanisms for implementing the EISA biomass-diesel requirements.

We anticipate that the Renewable Fuel Standard may increase demand for biodiesel in the long-term, as it sets a minimum usage requirement for biodiesel and other types of biomass-based diesel. However, there can be no assurances that demand for biodiesel will be increased by the RFS. Accordingly, there is no assurance that additional production of biodiesel and biomass-based diesel will not continually outstrip any additional demand for biodiesel that might be created by this new law. Furthermore, any additional delays in the EPA’s implementation of the EISA biomass-based diesel requirements could hinder the stimulation of additional biodiesel demand. We also anticipate that the expanded RFS will be primarily satisfied by ethanol, including both corn-based and other types of ethanol. The amount of corn-based ethanol that may be used to satisfy the RFS requirements is capped at 15 million gallons starting in 2015 and, accordingly, other types of ethanol, including cellulose-based ethanol, will likely be used to satisfy any requirements over and above the 15 million gallon corn-based ethanol cap.

The Renewable Fuel Standard system will be enforced through a system of registration, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for obligated parties, renewable producers (RIN generators), as well as any party that procures or trades Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), either as part of their renewable purchases or separately. Any person who violates any prohibition or requirement of the RFS program may be subject to civil penalties for each day of each violation. For example, under the final rule, a failure to acquire sufficient RINs to meet a party’s renewable fuels obligation would constitute a separate day of violation for each day the violation occurred during the annual averaging period. The enforcement provisions are necessary to ensure the RFS program goals are not compromised by illegal conduct in the creation and transfer of RINs. The Environmental Protection Agency has assigned “equivalence values” to each type of renewable energy fuel in order to determine compliance with the RFS. The equivalence values used ethanol as the base-line measurement (such that one gallon of ethanol is equivalent to one credit towards RFS compliance) and assigned biodiesel an equivalence

value of 1.5 (so that for each gallon of biodiesel used, the obligated party will receive one and one-half gallons credit towards its RFS compliance).

Biodiesel Tax Credits

The Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (VEETC) provides a tax credit of $1.00 per gallon for agri-biodiesel, which is biodiesel derived solely from virgin vegetable oils and animal fats that are blended with petroleum biodiesel. This includes esters derived from crude vegetable oils from corn, soybeans, sunflower seeds, cottonseeds, canola, crambo, rapeseeds, safflowers, flaxseeds, rice bran, and mustard seeds. The VEETC also provides a tax credit of $0.50 per gallon for non agri-biodiesel blended with petroleum diesel, which is biodiesel made from non-virgin or recycled vegetable oil and animal fats. The exercise tax credit may be claimed in both taxable and nontaxable markets, including exempt fleet fuel programs and off-road diesel markets. The desired effect of the excise tax credit is to streamline the use of biodiesel and encourage petroleum blenders to blend biodiesel as far upstream as possible, which will allow more biodiesel to be used in the marketplace. The excise tax credit expired on December 31, 2009; we believe there will be new legislation in 2010 to extend the expiration date. There is no assurance that additional legislation further extending the excise tax credit will be adopted. See “Risk Factors.”

State Legislation

Several states are currently researching and considering legislation to increase the amount of biodiesel used and produced in their states. However, Minnesota is the first and only state to mandate biodiesel use. The legislation, which became effective in September 2005, requires that all traditional #2 diesel fuel sold in the state contain a minimum of 2% biodiesel. The G2 Diesel blend has nearly the same cold flow properties as No. 2 petroleum diesel, which allows it to be used in Minnesota’s colder climate much the same as petroleum diesel throughout the year.

Other states have enacted legislation to encourage (but not require) biodiesel production and use. Several states provide tax incentives and grants for biodiesel-related studies and biodiesel production, blending and use. In addition, several governors have issued executive orders directing state agencies to use biodiesel blends to fuel their fleets.

Effect of Government Regulation

Environmental laws aimed at lowering fuel emissions may also promote biodiesel consumption. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required the EPA to regulate air emissions from a variety of sources. In a 2001 rule, the EPA provided for the decrease of emissions from vehicles using on-road diesel by requiring the reduction in the sulfur content of diesel fuel from 500 parts per million (ppm) to a significantly lower 15 ppm commencing in June 2006, and 10 ppm by 2011. Reducing the sulfur content of petroleum-based diesel leads to a decrease in lubricity of the fuel, which may adversely impact diesel engines. However, biodiesel is able to supply lubricity, which makes biodiesel an attractive blending stock to satisfy the requirements.

Furthermore, environmental regulations that may affect our company change frequently. It is possible that the government could adopt more stringent federal or state environmental rules or regulations which could increase our operating costs and expenses, or might eliminate provisions such as the Clean Air Act Amendments that may promote the use of biodiesel. The government could also adopt federal or state environmental rules or regulations that may have an adverse effect on the use of biodiesel. Furthermore, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) governs our plant operations. OSHA regulations may change such that the costs of the operation of the plant may increase. Any of these regulatory factors may result in higher costs or other materially adverse conditions affecting our operations, cash flows and financial performance.

Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws

The government’s regulation of the environment changes constantly. It is possible that more stringent federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted, which would increase our operating costs and expenses. It also is possible that federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted that could have an adverse effect on the use of biodiesel. There is always a risk that the Environmental Protection Agency may enforce certain rules and regulations differently than Ohio’s environmental administrators. Ohio or EPA rules are subject to change, and any such changes could result in greater regulatory burdens on plant operations. Any of these regulatory factors may result in higher costs or other materially adverse conditions affecting our operations, cash flows and financial performance.

Employees

As of April 14, 2010, we have 12 full-time employees.

Facilities

Our principal executive offices are located at 4450 Belden Village Street, N.W., Suite 800, Canton, Ohio 44718. These facilities are leased for a period of 2 years through September, 1 2011 from a non-affiliated party at annual rate of $54,000 (plus tax and other escalation charges.). Our Magnolia manufacturing plant is located at 3691 Hope Road, N.W., Magnolia, OH.

Since April 1, 2008, we have occupied warehouse space provided by one of our founders. We agreed to pay a total of $1 per month for the space. We record this fee as rent expense when incurred. From April 2008 to November 1, 2009, we constructed a leasehold improvement to the leased warehouse space for the purpose of locating our bio-fuel manufacturing facility.

Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this Prospectus, we are not a party to any legal proceedings.

Reports to Security Holders

We intend to file all required reports due under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Form 8-K and other information we are required to file pursuant to securities laws. You may read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC which is http://www.sec.gov. Our estimated costs associated with going public could exceed $200,000 per year.

No public market for our common stock

Our shares of common stock are “restricted securities” and may not be sold and/or transferred except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption under the 1933 Act and applicable state or “blue sky” laws. There is currently no market for any of the company’s common stock. The company is utilizing its “best efforts” to have a broker-dealer file a 15c2-11 application with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for the purpose of listing our common stock on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board. We can provide no assurances that our common stock will become available for quotation and trading on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board or that an established pubic market will even develop for our common stock. In the event that no public market develops for our common stock, then investors may have to hold on to their investment in our

securities for an indefinite period of time. There are no current or future plans to attempt to establish a public market for the company’s outstanding warrants. See “Risk Factors.”

MANAGEMENT

The following sets forth certain information with respect to the company’s executive officers and directors (based solely on information provided by them) as of the date hereof, it being understood that there are two vacancies on the Board of Directors and the Board is currently searching to fill such vacancies.


Name	Age	Title
Frederick C. Berndt	35	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Gary R Smith	66	Chief Operations Officer and Director

Daniel T. Lapp	40	Chief Financial Officer and Director

John D. Lane	62	Director

Dennis A. Nash	55	Director

Frederick C. Berndt

Frederick C. Berndt has an extensive background in banking, having studied Finance and Economics at Geneva College in Pennsylvania. Mr. Berndt began his career in Commercial Banking in 1995. In 1997, he became licensed as an NASD Series 7 and 63, for Rise Securities and became a Partner/Vice President of Berndt & Associates Investment Management, a full service money management firm that was formed in the early 1970’s. In 1999, Mr. Berndt passed his Securities Principal’s license and became the principal and compliance officer for Rise Securities, Inc. In 2001, Mr. Berndt left Berndt & Associates to pursue a consulting career in investment banking. He consulted for EWRX Internet solutions, an anti-virus software company and also consulted for Hamilton Scientific, a New Jersey based medical software company. In 2002, Mr. Berndt founded Bible Resources, Inc., a private corporation formed for the purpose of oil and gas exploration. He then successfully orchestrated the reverse takeover of The Havana Group, and co-developed this company which is now known as Surge Global Energy, Inc. Mr. Berndt served Surge Global Energy as Executive Vice President and a member of the Board of Directors for approximately three years between 2004 and 2006. Since 2007, Mr. Berndt has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of 11 Good Energy, Inc.

Gary R. Smith

Mr. Smith’s leadership ability, decision making skills, determination, and strength come largely from his longtime involvement in sports, as both an athlete and an official. At St. Cloud State University, Mr. Smith won the 1963 and 1964 National Collegiate NAIA Wrestling Championships. He then placed fourth in the 1964 Olympic Wrestling trials.

In 1977, Mr. Smith joined Cummins Engine company, managing major accounts for the industrial division. Mr. Smith advanced with Cummins, becoming the Executive Director of national accounts before leaving Cummins in 1984. Mr. Smith then joined Hercules Engines, Inc. where he gained an extensive knowledge of alternative fuel engines.

In 1998, Mr. Smith joined High Plains Corporation, an ethanol manufacturer, for the purpose of restructuring the company. Mr. Smith coordinated Abengoa’s acquisition of High Plains Corporation and as a result of Mr. Smith’s leadership in the deal, per share value of High Plains increased from $.69 to $5.64, the amount Abengoa offered per share for High Plains Corporation. After the successful restructuring and sale of High Plains, Mr. Smith decided to leave the company and pursue other interests, leaving behind the solid management team that he created. He was a member of the Abengoa Board of Directors for three years. He also served two terms as Chairman of the Renewable Fuels Association in 2000 and 2001. Today, Mr. Smith lives in Canton, Ohio and serves on the Board of Directors for the National Wresting Hall of Fame and the Professional Football Hall of Fame. Since March 1, 2009, Mr. Smith serves as Chief Operating Officer and as a Director for 11 Good Energy, Inc. As Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Smith’s duties include providing strategic planning advice in the areas including, but not limited to, marketing strategies; developing strategic alliances with suppliers, affiliations, and end users; assisting in attracting key personnel; general business consulting and operations.

Daniel T. Lapp

Daniel T. Lapp began his accounting and finance career 17 years ago as an auditor with Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, in Washington D.C., planning and performing audits for the government contractor, high technology and oil and gas industries. His public accounting experience lead to the position of manager of operational/internal audits for Harman International Industries, Inc., an international Fortune 1000 electronics manufacturer. This position focused on financial audits of all aspects of the balance sheet, review of the internal control environment, and analysis of manufacturing facilities for accounting and asset valuation issues and performing due diligence procedures for potential acquisition targets. Mr. Lapp planned and performed the accounting/operational audits of over 50 subsidiary companies within this company. Over his career, Mr. Lapp has also has built and extensive knowledge of accounting system management and contract review to complement his internal audit and public accounting experience. Mr. Lapp graduated from Kent State University and is a licensed CPA. Since May 2007, Mr. Lapp has served as a Director and Chief Financial Officer of 11 Good Energy, Inc.

John D. Lane

Mr. Lane entered the securities industry in May 1969 with a bank-trading firm in New Jersey. He founded Lane Capital Markets, LLC in 2001 as an Investment Banking Partnership. Mr. Lane has managed/co-managed over 45 IPO or secondary transactions and has participated in hundreds of underwriting and selling groups since the early 1990’s. Prior to forming Lane Capital Markets, he held the position of Managing Director of Capital Markets at a New York based firm in Fairfield County, Connecticut. He has been associated with several major firms including Boettcher & Co., Advest & Co. and Dain Rauscher. Mr. Lane has served as officer, director, owner, trader, department manager, corporate finance director and syndicate manager. He has been active in several Fairfield County organizations. Mr. Lane has been quoted in Business Week, Barron’s, Forbes, Investment Dealer Digest, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Entrepreneurial Magazine and several other business publications. Mr. Lane served as a Director of the National Investment Bankers Association between 1991-1995 and has served as a Director and Advisor to several other boards. He regularly speaks on issues facing the changing securities industry. Having traveled several times to Washington, D.C. he has lobbied on behalf of the securities industry.

Mr. Lane has been an active member of several SIFMA committees, including the SIFMA Small Firms Committee, in which he was Chairman in 1994, the SIFMA Membership Committee, in which he was Chairman for several terms, and also served three years on the SIFMA Syndicate Committee. He is currently serving as District Chairman for the Security Industry association in the New England district. In 1996, John traveled to China with the SIFMA for 17 days as a guest of the Chinese government to meet with banks, brokerage firms and the government to discuss experiences in the capital-raising arena and several topics regarding the securities business.

Mr. Lane is currently a FINRA mediator working to resolve industry disputes. John was appointed to a three-year term to serve as Chairman in 2002 on the FINRA District Business Conduct Committee out of Boston, MA. He has recently completed his three year term on the FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board, which meets and

recommends solutions to industry issues and their impact on regional and small broker/dealers. Also, Mr. Lane has recently completed his 3^rd three year term on the FINRA Corporate Finance Committee and has been active in crafting a policy on the hot topic of research analyst payment for deal gathering. Mr. Lane worked for two years toward the restructuring of the recently adopted FINRA’s Corporate Finance Rules. Mr. Lane was elected to a one year term on the FINRA Advisory Board in 2002, meeting on national issues affecting the securities industry. In September 2002 Mr. Lane was appointed to the FINRA Nominating Committee, and served as Chairman in 2003 representing the Boston District. Mr. Lane was appointed, in January 2003, to serve on the standing FINRA consultive committee designed to provide input to FINRA staff on the investigations of disciplinary matters involving emerging regulatory issues, standards of practices, or new practices, or market and securities industry issued where industry expertise would be of value. Mr. Lane has served as a director of 11 Good Energy since July 2009.

Dennis A. Nash

Dennis A. Nash has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Kenan Advantage Group (KAG) and it predecessors since 1991. As a young teen, he moved from Alma, Michigan to Pittsburg, Pennsylvania where he later began his career in the transportation industry. He then moved to Akron, Ohio to participate in a transportation management program sponsored by Coastal Industries and attended Kent State University. After spending several years in the petroleum transportation industry with Coastal, he moved to Leaseway Transportation, based in Cleveland, Ohio. With Leaseway, Mr. Nash spent the next fifteen years holding senior management positions in operations, sales and marketing.

In 1991, Mr. Nash made a decision to join entrepreneurial ranks by forming KAG predecessor company, Advantage Tank Lines, Inc. He has served as President and CEO from the beginning and has taken the company (now known as Kenan Advantage Group) from annual revenues of $7 million in 1992 to over $800 million today. The company is North America’s largest bulk transportation and logistics provider to the petroleum and specialty products industries. KAG operates from 100 terminals and 98 satellite locations in 38 states, employs approximately 5,000 people, and is the only fuels delivery business with a national presence.

With respect to industry affiliations, for many years Mr. Nash has served on various labor and advisory councils and the Board of Directors for National Tank Truck Carriers and the American Trucking Association. He also serves on the Northwestern University Transportation Center Business Advisory Council. Other professional affiliations include the Pro Football Hall of Fame, Stark Development Board, Dedicated Transport and Mercy Medical Center, where he also serves on the board’s Executive Committee. Mr. Nash has served as a director of the company since July 8, 2009.

Committees

We do not have a standing audit, nominating, compensation committee, or committees performing similar functions. Our board of directors believes that it is not necessary to have standing audit, nominating or compensation committees at this time because the functions of such committees are adequately performed by our board of directors. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, requires the company to have an audit committee consisting solely of independent directors.

John D. Lane and Dennis A Nash may be considered “independent directors”, but none of them are “financial experts” as those terms are defined herein. Under the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“NASDAQ”) definition, an independent director means a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individuals having a relationship that, in the opinion of the company’ board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of the director. The board’s discretion in determining director independence is not completely unfettered. Further, under the NASDAQ definition, an independent director is a person who (1) is not currently (or whose immediate family members are not currently), and has not been over the past three years (or whose immediate family members have not been over the past three years), employed by the company; (2) has not (or whose immediate family members have not) been paid more than $60,000 during the current or past three fiscal

years; (3) has not (or whose immediately family has not) been a partner in or controlling shareholder or executive officer of an organization which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in excess of the greater of $200,000 or 5% of that organizations consolidated gross revenues, in any of the most recent three fiscal years; (4) has not (or whose immediate family members have not), over the past three years been employed as an executive officer of a company in which an executive officer of our company has served on that company’s compensation committee; or (5) is not currently (or whose immediate family members are not currently), and has not been over the past three years (or whose immediate family members have not been over the past three years) a partner of our company’s outside auditor. The term “Financial Expert” is defined as a person who has the following attributes: an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements; has the ability to assess the general application of such principals in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the company’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities; an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and an understanding of audit committee functions.

In the future, we intend to have an audit committee, compensation committee, management committee, nominating committee and such other committees as determined by the Board of Directors to be in the best interest of the company and to be in compliance with all applicable securities and state laws and listing requirements of any applicable exchanges or NASDAQ that the company’s securities may become listed on in the future, of which we can provide no assurances that this will occur. In the event we form an audit committee, we intend to have a “financial expert” as an independent board member serving on the Audit Committee, although no assurances can be given in this regard.

Corporate Governance

Our business, property and affairs are managed by, or under the direction of, our Board, in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and our By-Laws. Members of the Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer and other key members of management, by reviewing materials provided to them by management.

In the past, there have been no arrangements or understandings pursuant to which a director or executive officer was selected to be a director or executive officer other than employment contracts with each of our executive officers. We have had no nominating committee of the Board. Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board, subject to their rights under any employment contracts.

We continue to review our corporate governance policies and practices by comparing our policies and practices with those suggested by various groups or authorities active in evaluating or setting best practices for corporate governance of public companies. Based on this review, we have adopted, and will continue to adopt, changes that the Board believes are the appropriate corporate governance policies and practices for our Company. We intend to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and subsequent rule changes made by the SEC and any applicable securities exchange.

Director Qualifications and Diversity

The board seeks independent directors who represent a diversity of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the board’s deliberations and decisions. Candidates shall have substantial experience with one or more publicly traded companies or shall have achieved a high level of distinction in their chosen fields. The board is particularly interested in maintaining a mix that includes individuals who are active or retired executive officers and senior executives, particularly those with experience in the natural resources, finance and capital market industries.

In evaluating nominations to the Board of Directors, our Board also looks for certain personal attributes, such as integrity, ability and willingness to apply sound and independent business judgment, comprehensive understanding of a director’s role in corporate governance, availability for meetings and consultation on Company matters, and the willingness to assume and carry out fiduciary responsibilities. Qualified candidates for membership on the Board will be considered without regard to race, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national origin or disability.

Risk Oversight

Enterprise risks are identified and prioritized by management and each prioritized risk is assigned to the full board for oversight as follows:

Risks and exposures associated with corporate governance, and management and director succession planning, strategic, financial and execution risks and other current matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects or reputation.

Risks and exposures associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosure, internal control over financial reporting, financial policies, investment guidelines and credit and liquidity matters.

Risks and exposures associated with leadership assessment, and compensation programs and arrangements, including incentive plans.

Board Leadership Structure

The Chairman of the Board presides at all meetings of the Board. The Chairman is appointed on an annual basis by at least a majority vote of the remaining directors. Currently, the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are not separated. The company has no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer could become part of the succession planning process and that it is in the best interests of the company to make this determination from time to time.

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of company common stock prior to and after the Offering:


	•	each of our stockholders who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
	•	each of the company’s executive officers; and
	•	each of the company’s directors.

Beneficial ownership is determined based on the rules and regulations of the Commission. A person has beneficial ownership of shares if the individual has the power to vote and/or dispose of shares. This power can be sole or shared, and direct or indirect. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options or warrants held by that person are counted as outstanding. These shares, however, are not counted as outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares set forth opposite that stockholder’s name.




	Shares of Common Stock
Name of Beneficial Owner	Beneficially Owned	% of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)

Frederick C. Berndt (2)	3,900,000		19.5
Daniel T. Lapp (2)	350,000		1.7
Gary R. Smith (3)	300,000		1.4
John Lane (4)	801,000		3.8
Dennis Nash (5)	320,000		1.5

All officers and directors as a group (six persons) (6)	5,671,000		28.4

5% Shareholders
Clayton Livengood and Susan Livengood	1,625,000		7.9




(1)	Based upon 19,976,560 common shares outstanding as of April 1, 2010.
(2)	Mr. Berndt also owns 11,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock which have the same voting rights as Common Stock, except as otherwise provided by Delaware law, which shares are not reflected in the table above. Mr. Lapp directly owns 300,000 common shares and he had 50,000 shares held in a family trust.
(3)	Includes options to purchase 100,000 common shares.
(4)	Includes options and warrants to purchase 101,000 shares of common stock.
(5)	Includes warrants to purchase 40,000 shares.
(6)	Includes options and warrants to purchase 441,000 shares of common stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.

We have no compensation plans to issue equity securities. However, on July 22, 2009, we granted to our officers and Directors options to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of Common Stock exercisable at $3.00 per share over a term of three years ending July 22, 2012. The fair value of the options of $200,205 was charged to current period operations.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the overall compensation earned over the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 by (1) each person who served as the principal executive officer of the company during fiscal year

2009; (2) the company’s most highly compensated (up to a maximum of two) executive officers as of December 31, 2009 with compensation during fiscal year 2009 of $100,000 or more; and (3) those two individuals, if any, who would have otherwise been in included in section (2) above but for the fact that they were not serving as an executive of the company as of December 31, 2009.


						Salary Compensation
Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)	Stock Awards	Options Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($) (2)(3)		Total ($)
Frederick C. Berndt	2009	$	196,000	50,000	N/A		N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	246,000
Chief Executive
Officer, President	2008	$	196,000	—	N/A		N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	196,000

Daniel T. Lapp	2009	$	105,000	50,000	N/A		N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	155,000
Chief Financial Officer	2008	$	105,000	—	N/A		N/A	$	—	$	—	$		$	105,000

Gary R. Smith	2009	$	250,000	80,000	N/A	$	40,041	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	370,041
Chief Operations
Officer	2008		N/A	—	N/A		N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—





N/A	Not applicable.

(1)	ASC 718 requires the company to determine the overall value of the options as of the date of grant based upon the Black-Scholes method of valuation, and to then expense that value over the service period over which the options become exercisable (vest). As a general rule, for time-in-service-based options, the company will immediately expense any option or portion thereof which is vested upon grant, while expensing the balance on a pro rata basis over the remaining vesting term of the option. For a description ASC 718 and the assumptions used in determining the value of the options under the Black-Scholes model of valuation, see the notes to the financial statements included with this Memorandum.

(2)	Includes all other compensation not reported in the preceding columns, including (i) perquisites and other personal benefits, or property, unless the aggregate amount of such compensation is less than $10,000; (ii) any “gross-ups” or other amounts reimbursed during the fiscal year for the payment of taxes; (iii) discounts from market price with respect to securities purchased from the company except to the extent available generally to all security holders or to all salaried employees; (iv) any amounts paid or accrued in connection with any termination (including without limitation through retirement, resignation, severance or constructive termination, including change of responsibilities) or change in control; (v) contributions to vested and unvested defined contribution plans; (vi) any insurance premiums paid by, or on behalf of, the company relating to life insurance for the benefit of the named executive officer; and (vii) any dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards that are not factored into the grant date fair value required to be reported in a preceding column.

(3)	Includes compensation for service as a director described under Director Compensation, below.

For a description of the material terms of each named executive officers’ employment agreement, including the terms of the terms of any common share purchase option grants, see that section of this Prospectus captioned “Employment Agreements.”

We have reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all employees and concluded that any risks arising from our policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)) imposes a $1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid to the company’s chief executive officer or any of the company’s four other most highly compensated executive officers who are employed as of the end of the year. This limitation does not apply to compensation that meets the requirements under Section 162(m) for “qualifying performance-based” compensation (i.e., compensation paid only if the individual’s performance meets preestablished objective goals based on performance criteria approved by the stockholders). Prior to this offering, we were not subject to Section 162(m). Going forward, we will seek to maximize the compensation deduction of our executive officers and to structure the performance-based portion of the compensation of our executive officers in a manner that complies with Section 162(m). However, because we will compensate our executive officers in a manner designed to promote our varying corporate objectives, our compensation committee may not adopt a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. For 2009, cash compensation paid to our executive officers did not exceed the $1 million limit for any covered officer.

No outstanding common share purchase option or other equity-based award granted to or held by any named executive officer in 2009 were repriced or otherwise materially modified, including extension of exercise periods, the change of vesting or forfeiture conditions, the change or elimination of applicable performance criteria, or the change of the bases upon which returns are determined, nor was there any waiver or modification of any specified performance target, goal or condition to payout.

For a description of the material terms of any contract, agreement, plan or other arrangement that provides for any payment to a named executive officer in connection with his or her resignation, retirement or other termination, or a change in control of the company see “Employment Agreements”.

Executive Officer Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides certain information concerning any common share purchase options, stock awards or equity incentive plan awards held by each of our named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2009.


Option Awards							Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Frederick C. Berndt	—	—	—	$	—	—	—	—	—	—


Daniel T. Lapp	—	—	—	$	—	—	—	—	—	—



Gary R. Smith	100,000	—	—	$	3.00	06/30/2012	—	—	—	—

Employment Agreements

Each of the following executive officers is a party to an employment agreement with the company.


Name	Position	2010 Annual Salary (1)		2010 Bonus (1)

Frederick C. Berndt	Chief Executive Officer,		$ 196,000	(1)
	President

Daniel T. Lapp	Chief Financial Officer		$ 105,000	(1)

Gary R. Smith	Chief Operations Officer		$ 250,000	(1)




(1)	Bonuses each year are at the discretion of the Board as described below.

The company entered into employment contracts as of November 11, 2007 with each of Frederick C. Berndt and Daniel T. Lapp. The term of each contract terminates on the close of business on December 31, 2012. Gary R. Smith entered into a three year employment contract on March 1, 2009 and his contract expires on March 1, 2012. Mr. Berndt’s contract provides for him to act as the Chief Executive Officer of the company. Mr. Lapp’s contract provides for him to serve as the Chief Financial Officer of the company. Mr. Smith’s contract provides for him to serve as the Chief Operating Officer. The employment contracts provide for essentially the same terms and conditions except as otherwise noted herein. The base annual salaries of Messrs. Berndt, Lapp and Smith are $196,000, $105,000 and $250,000, respectively, plus bonuses in the discretion of the company. Each agreement provides for indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law. Each executive may be terminated for cause after providing the executive with 30 days’ prior written notice. The executive may terminate his employment contract after providing the company with 30 day’s prior written notice upon the occurrence of one of the following events:


•	Failure of the company to elect the executive or to reappoint the executive to his current job title;
•	Any material change by the company in executive’s functions, duties and responsibilities;
•	The liquidation, consolidation or merger (including assumption of control by other parties) of the company or transfer of all or substantially all of the company’s assets unless such consolidation, merger or business consolidation does not adversely affect executive’s position or the dignity of responsibility of executive, executive’s judgment; and
•	Any material breach of the agreement by the company.

In the event that agreement is terminated other than for cause, the company shall pay a lump sum on the date of termination, severance compensation to the executive in an amount equal to the sum of executive’s salary and bonus paid in the prior fiscal year. In the event the employment contract expires and the executive is not rehired in the same position under the terms and conditions of a new executive employment agreement mutually acceptable to the parties or in the event executive dies or becomes disabled, the company shall pay in lump sum on the date of termination severance compensation in an amount equal to the sum of executive’s salary and bonus paid in the prior fiscal year. In addition, executive (except in the case of his death) shall be entitled to continue health benefits for a period of 18 months or until the executive is employed full time with another employer

In the event of a reorganization, merger of consolidation where the company is not the surviving corporation or in the case of a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the company, then all of executive’s options to purchase common stock of the company outstanding at the time of the event and which were granted six months or more prior to the event, shall immediately become exercisable in full and, upon the election of the executive given to the company within 180 days of the event, and the company shall repurchase for

cash all or any part of the options as specified in the written election at a price per share equal to the difference between the fair market value of the company’s stock on the execution date and the option exercise price per share.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Frederick C. Berndt entered into a revolving note agreement with the company beginning on November 11, 2007. The company initiated the note arrangement to allow Mr. Berndt to assist the company, primarily in the early stages of development, personally with operating capital as required. In addition, the company initiated the revolving note agreement to allow the company to assist Mr. Berndt with cash advances used for costs incurred during the process of improving the company’s marketing, political and regulatory exposureMr. Berndt has agreed to reimburse the company for the costs of these promotions. These costs consisted primarily of travel and sponsorship costs. The company charges 5% interest per annum calculated on the last day of the year based on an average of the quarterly balance of the note. The balance of the note including interest was due and payable on December 31, 2009, with a term of 30 days to settle the note payable. Mr. Berndt has signed a note receivable for $508,688, as of December 31, 2008. On December 15, 2009, Mr. Berndt retired the note and accrued interest balances of $787,144 through a stock repurchase transaction with the company. See “Certain Transactions”

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Stock Options

Stock options and equity compensation awards to our non-employee / non-executive directors are at the discretion of the Board. On July 22, 2009, three year options to purchase 100,000 shares exercisable at a price of $3.00 per share were granted to five directors, including four non-employee / non-executive directors. The company recorded $200,205 of compensation expense relating to these options as of December 31, 2009.

Cash Compensation

Each of our non-employee / non-executive directors is eligible to receive a fee of $2,500 quarterly to be paid for attending each Board meeting. In addition, each non-employee/non-executive director also receives $3,000 for each annual in person meeting attended.

Travel Expenses

All directors shall be reimbursed for their reasonable out of pocket expenses associated with attending the meeting.

Director Compensation

The following table shows the overall compensation earned for the 2009 fiscal year with respect to each non-employee and non-executive director (including Phil E. Pearce who recently passed away) as of December 31, 2009. It should be noted that the stock awards required transfer of shares to the named directors from principal stockholders of the company.


	DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name and Principal Position	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($) (4)	Option Awards ($) (1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (2)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($) (3)	Total ($)

John D. Lane		7,500	—		40,041	—	—	—	$	47,541
Dennis A. Nash		5,000	—		40,041	—	—	—		45,041
Gary Smith		—	—		40,041	—	—	—		40,041
Phil E. Pearce		2,500	—		40,041	—	—	—		42,541
Glen Schaffert		2,500	—		40.041	—	—	—		42,541


(1)	ASC 718 requires the company to determine the overall value of the options as of the date of grant based upon the Black-Scholes method of valuation, and to then expense that value over the service period over which the options become exercisable (vest).


	The table above reflects the full value of the options granted for the year of grant. As a general rule, for time-in-service-based options, the company will immediately expense any option or portion thereof which is vested upon grant, while expensing the balance on a pro rata basis over the remaining vesting term of the option. For a description ASC 718 and the assumptions used in determining the value of the options under the Black-Scholes model of valuation, see the notes to the financial statements included with this Memorandum.

(2)	Excludes awards or earnings reported in preceding columns.

(3)	Includes all other compensation not reported in the preceding columns, including (i) perquisites and other personal benefits, or property, unless the aggregate amount of such compensation is less than $10,000; (ii) any “gross-ups” or other amounts reimbursed during the fiscal year for the payment of taxes; (iii) discounts from market price with respect to securities purchased from the company except to the extent available generally to all security holders or to all salaried employees; (iv) any amounts paid or accrued in connection with any termination (including without limitation through retirement, resignation, severance or constructive termination, including change of responsibilities) or change in control; (v) contributions to vested and unvested defined contribution plans; (vi) any insurance premiums paid by, or on behalf of, the company relating to life insurance for the benefit of the director; (vii) any consulting fees earned, or paid or payable; (viii) any annual costs of payments and promises of payments pursuant to a director legacy program and similar charitable awards program; and (ix) any dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards that are not factored into the grant date fair value required to be reported in a preceding column.

(4)	John D. Lane, Dennis A. Nash and Phil E. Pearce were transferred 700,000 shares, 100,000 shares and 100,000 shares respectively, from certain principal stockholders of the company, as additional consideration for their service as a director of the company, the value of which is not included in the table above.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

In May 2007, the company was formed and we issued its founder stock in the amount of 9,700,000 shares to six persons at a cash purchase price of $.0001 per share. Included in the 9,700,000 shares were 9,050,000 shares issued to Frederick C. Berndt, 300,000 shares issued to Daniel T. Lapp, 100,000 shares issued to Krista R. Ringer, 200,000 shares issued to Steven S. Quinn and 50,000 shares issued to members of the law firm of Morse & Morse, PLLC, securities counsel to the company. Mr. Berndt also purchased at a cash purchase price of $.0001 per share, 11,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock which have no rights, preferences or privileges other than the right to vote the same as an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock, except as otherwise provided by applicable Delaware law.

In October 2007, the company completed its acquisition of 11 Good’s Energy Ltd., its operating subsidiary, and in connection therewith, the company issued an aggregate of 4,285,714 shares to the founders of 11 Good Energy Ltd., including 2,782,000 to Clayton Livengood, 1,218,000 shares to his wife, Susan K. Livengood, and 285,714 shares to Aaron R. Harnar.

Subsequent to the receipt of shares by Frederick C. Berndt and Clayton Livengood, they have reduced their Common Stock ownership directly owned by them to 3,900,000 shares and 407,000 shares, respectively; through the sale and/or gift of 5,150,000 shares and 2,375,000 shares, respectively, to various directors of the company identified herein and to various family, friends and non-affiliated persons.

On September 11, 2008 Frederick C. Berndt personally secured a $275,000 note payable of the company to Surge Global Energy, Inc. with real property owned by him. This loan has since been retired by the company.

In October of 2009, we agreed to purchase 450,000 shares of the company’s outstanding common stock held by Surge Global Energy, Inc, an investor in 11 Good Energy, Inc. The purchase price was $450,000 ($1 per share). The company has recorded the transaction at cost to Treasury Stock.

On December 15, 2009, we agreed to purchase 425,000 shares of our outstanding common stock held by Frederick C. Berndt, our founder and CEO. The purchase price was $850,000 ($2 per share). The transaction satisfied a loan payable by Frederick C. Berndt to the company in the amount of $787,144. The remaining amount was paid to Frederick C. Berndt in 2010. The company has recorded the transaction at cost to Treasury Stock.

In February 2010, the company agreed to purchase 50,000 shares of the company’s outstanding common stock held by Surge Global Energy, Inc, an investor in 11 Good Energy, Inc. The purchase price was $122,500 ($2.45 per share). The company has recorded the transaction at cost to Treasury Stock. Mr. Berndt is a stockholder of Surge and a former director of Surge.

Note Offering

Between 2007 and 2009, the company raised approximately $7,930,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of its convertible promissory notes which became due and payable on June 30, 2009. The company paid commissions (finders fees) totaling $643,700 in connection with this offering. The notes provided for each noteholder to have the option to convert their notes into common stock based upon a 15% discount to the company’s first equity raise which later occurred between August and December 2009 at $3.00 per share. Therefore, the conversion price of the notes became $2.55 per share. Upon repayment of each note or the conversion thereof, each noteholder received one warrant for each share of common stock that was issued upon conversion of the notes (including accrued interest thereon) or, in the case the notes were retired through the payment of cash, one warrant for each share of common stock that would have been issued upon the conversion of these notes had the noteholder converted the principal only into common stock. These unclassified warrants, which total 3,228,523, have an expiration date of June 30, 2012. The exercise price of the warrants which is equal to the conversion price of the notes is fixed at $2.55 per share. Upon completion of the equity offering described below, the noteholders had 30 days to elect to convert their notes as described above or to receive its return of their principal and accrued interest thereon. As of December 31, 2009, the company repaid $1,967,916 in principal plus accrued interest thereon to note holders and as of March 1, 2010, converted the remaining $6,498,708 in principal plus accrued interest thereon to 2,548,513 shares of common stock.

Equity Offering

In August 2009, the company commenced an equity offering which had several closings between August 2009 and March 2010. The company raised gross proceeds of $12,052,000 from the sale of 4,017,333 shares of common stock and Class A warrants to purchase 2,008,667 shares of the company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share through the close of business on June 30, 2012. The company paid commissions totaling $1,205,200 in connection with this offering. In March 2010, the company also granted 686,239 warrants to the placement agent in connection with the equity offering.

Transactions with Affiliates

Since April 1, 2008, the company has occupied warehouse space provided by one of the company’s founders. The company agreed to pay a total of $1 per month for the space. The company records this fee as rent expense when incurred. During this time period, the company constructed a leasehold improvement to the leased warehouse space for the purpose of locating our bio- fuel manufacturing facility.

Other Transactions

The company has entered into consulting agreements with outside building contractors, individuals responsible for creating political liaisons and investor relations. The agreements are generally for a term of one year or less from inception and renewable unless either the company or the consultant terminates such agreement by written notice. The company incurred $750,996 and $289,190 in fees to these individuals for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in a consulting role.

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

The following table provides certain information with respect to the selling security holders’ beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 1, 2010 and as adjusted to give effect to the sale of all of the shares offered hereby. The column “shares beneficially owned prior to the Offering” includes outstanding common stock and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding Warrants/Options held by the Selling Security Holders. The column Maximum Shares Offered in Offering represents shares of common stock that are currently outstanding except as otherwise noted. None of the Selling Security Holders is an affiliate of us, and none of them has had a material relationship with us during the past three years, except John D. Lane and Dennis A. Nash are directors of the company and Jesup & Lamont Security Corp. acted as our Placement Agent in connection with an equity offering of $12,052,000, and Susan Bertash, Bill Corbett, Ryan Mitchell, Greg Ricker and John D. Lane are together with Jesup members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or persons associated or affiliated with a FINRA member. See “Plan of Distribution.” Each selling security holder possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities shown, unless otherwise noted, whether a shareholder beneficially owns a security is determined by Rule 13d-3(a) of the Exchange Act. Rule 13d-3(a) provides that a beneficial owner includes: “any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i).Voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security; and/or, (ii) Investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security.” Lastly, Rule 13d-3(a) provides that a “person shall be deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security… if that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such security, as defined in Rule 13d-3(a)…within sixty days, including but not limited to any right to acquire…through the conversion of a security ….”


	SHARES	MAXIMUM	SHARES
NAME OF EACH	BENEFICIALLY	SHARES	OWNED	% SHARES
SELLING	OWNED PRIOR	OFFERED IN	AFTER	BENEFICIALLY
STOCKHOLDER	TO OFFERING	OFFERING	OFFERING	OWNED
				BEFORE /AFTER(1)


Stephen P. Smith	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*
David E. Marcus	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*
Donald Drapkin	210,000	70,000	140,000	*/*
A. Morgan Wright	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*

Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd.	75,000	25,000	50,000	*/*
Cranshire Capital LP	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*
Rios Family Trust	225,000	75,000	150,000	*/*
Michael Peters	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
Sun Creek, LLC	120,000	40,000	80,000	*/*
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*
EDJ Limited	30,000	10,000	20,000
Porter Partners, L.P.	120,000	40,000	80,000	*/*

Edwin A. Turner and Jeanne C. Turner
JTWROS	30,000	10,000	20,000	*/*

Serenity Farms Properties, LLC	30,000	10,000	20,000	*/*
Paul Meades	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Einion Roberts	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Argosy Control Engineering, LTD	193,322	60,080	133,242	*/*
Kevan and Elaine Millichip	131,478	37,120	94,358	*/*
Noel Dempsey	76,248	22,062	54,186	*/*

Massey Bros (Feeds), LTD Argosy Control EPP	96,720	28,180	68,540	*/*
Nigel Walls	30,000	10,000	20,000	*/*

Malachy Brennan Pension Trust	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Stuart Sheppard	95,576	28,519	67,057	*/*
John Adrian Simpson	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Declan Counihan	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Stephen McCracken	50,334	15,084	35,250	*/*
Paul A Newbould	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Dipak M. Shah	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Richard Atkinson	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Jeremy N. Barker	99,044	26,261	72,783	*/*
Faheem Hashmi	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Andrew Biggs	20,108	6,027	14,081	*/*
Brian and Jean Adam	557,694	172,443	385,251	*/*
JM Bond	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Imtiaz Ahmed	10,500	3,500	7,000	*/*


Philip Piers Parbury	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
David C. Stroud	18,000	6,000	12,000	*/*

Michael Tomkins and Kay Tomkins	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
Alex J. Hazle	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Peter & Phillip Robinson	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Richard Pugh	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Leo Brennen Pension Trust	61,500	20,500	41,000	*/*
Leo G. Brennen	16,500	5,500	11,000	*/*
Mayur N. Patel	71,244	22,061	49,183	*/*
Paul Treacy Pension Trust	181,500	60,500	121,000	*/*
Nigel Collingwood	13,500	4,500	9,000	*/*

Rollo Frederick Thistlewaite Thompson	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Colin McKenzie	18,000	6,000	12,000	*/*
Fenland Enterprises LTD	13,500	4,500	9,000	*/*
Kiritkumar Sonigia	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
Geoffery John Palmer	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Russell Godfrey	22,044	6,011	16,033	*/*
Allan Parbery	34,500	11,500	23,000	*/*
Eno & Nonye Williams	21,000	7,000	14,000	*/*
Edward A. McQuat	27,000	9,000	18,000	*/*
R.C. Maude	37,648	11,537	26,111	*/*
Mukesh Shah	18,126	5,032	13,094	*/*
Angus John Maclellan	30,000	10,000	20,000	*/*
Aidan Mcauley	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Leslie Allan	100,596	26,774	73,822	*/*
Trevor Routh	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Yogesh Ramji	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Damien and Roisin Lynch	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Thomas Hugh Damien Lynch Personal Pension Plan	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Peter Allen Investments, LTD	60,000	20,000	40,000	*/*
Derek Henry	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
Peter Allen and Henry Bladon	270,000	90,000	180,000	*/*
Peter Victor Dickerson	69,000	23,000	46,000	*/*

Tenex Distribution Services, LTD.	19,500	6,500	13,000	*/*
Pat Mooney	39,000	13,000	26,000	*/*
Paul Hopkinson	18,000	6,000	12,000	*/*
Laurant M. Avenet	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Simon Jackson	51,762	15,566	36,196	*/*

A&M Bargains (Wyre) LTD.	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
John Barton	28,500	9,500	19,000	*/*
Andrew George Place	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Richard Horswill	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*


Eyes Right Opticians, LTD	160,394	46,723	113,671	*/*
Ian James Cruickshank	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Matthew P. Lupa	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Ashwin Patel	18,000	6,000	12,000	*/*
Gary A. Mason	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Gerard McCloskey	106,192	28,673	77,519	*/*
Neelam Haria	18,148	5,037	13,111	*/*
Nicholas Campeau	16,500	5,500	11,000	*/*
Andrew Peter Noel Toy	21,000	7,000	14,000	*/*
Vijaya and Varsha Halabe	18,000	6,000	12,000	*/*
Ian Bowker	40,500	13,500	27,000	*/*
Neil Lawless	96,000	32,000	64,000	*/*
Pat McGowan	22,999	7,666	15,333	*/*
Gerald Carroll	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
David A. Bradfield	36,000	12,000	24,000	*/*
Berrick Industries	193,500	64,500	129,000	*/*
Mark Roberts	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Anthony Treacy	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Terry Commons	10,500	3,500	7,000	*/*
Martin Davies	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
James Ure SIPP	34,500	11,500	23,000	*/*
Robin North	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Tanvic Group	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
David Charles Stone	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*

Trustees of Vibracoustics Retirement Benefit Scheme	237,246	70,687	166,559	*/*
Mullingar Pewter, LTD	388,302	105,825	282,477	1.9/1.4
Christopher Hayward	16,500	5,500	11,000	*/*
Simon Ledee	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Stephen Murray	57,688	17,547	40,141	*/*
Geoff McCarthy	137,404	42,476	94,928	*/*
Raymond Mabel Herron	36,000	12,000	24,000	*/*
Winston Ledee	26,736	7,559	19,177	*/*
Wayne & Anne Marie Nunn	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Andrew Fuller	42,000	14,000	28,000	*/*
John Rudland	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
Denis Doyle	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Nick Kinghorn	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Mark and Deidra Rafferty	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Philip & Adele Nielsen	255,406	75,101	180,305	1.2/*
Derek Kennedy	58,334	16,084	42,250	*/*
Philips Mark Router	40,500	13,500	27,000	*/*

John Anton George Quarry Pension	93,000	31,000	62,000	*/*

Andrew Phillip Nute Personal Pension	25,500	8,500	17,000	*/*
Pace Export, (UK) LTD	150,000	50,000	100,000	*/*
John and Aisling Murray	10,500	3,500	7,000	*/*
Pat McMahon	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Pat Rathborne	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*


Michael & Rachel Kirkwood	218,230	67,057	151,173	1.0/*
Andrew Thorpe	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
John Hirst	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
The Green Island Scheme	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Elena McCloskey	120,000	40,000	80,000	*/*
Dan McCloskey	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*

Robin & Florence Waterer	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
The Berkshire Trout Farm	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Kieran Middleton	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Gregory Ledee	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
Gyronix USA LLC	10,500	3,500	7,000	*/*
Peter Milchard	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Robert & Patricia Walters	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Roger & Elizabeth Hughes	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Martin Healy	42,680	12,545	30,135	*/*
Paul Adrian Battera	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Briane Silke	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*

Brendan Quinn Pharmacy LTD.	18,550	5,512	13,038	*/*
Gary Jolly-Betts	26,214	7,053	19,161	*/*
Howard Sherrington	24,000	8,000	16,000	*/*
Roger Duckworth	72,766	22,566	50,200	*/*
John Norquay Kippen	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Browne Logistics	16,500	5,500	11,000	*/*
Neil Browne	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
Val Lee Pension Trust	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Alex Larkin	34,500	11,500	23,000	*/*

Henry Bladon - Chase Lodge Care	12,000	4,000	8,000	*/*
Ashwani Kumar Saggar	9,000	3,000	6,000	*/*
Steve Cyr	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
John Duffy	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
David John Lee	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
BW SIPP Trustees Limited	15,000	5,000	10,000	*/*
Thistle Bagpipes Works	7,500	2,500	5,000	*/*
Tony Cyr	6,000	2,000	4,000	*/*
Joseph and Dawn Bridson	70,196	20,049	50,147	*/*
Dennis Nash	120,000	40,000	80,000	*/*
Elwood Noxon	40,724	11,681	29,043	*/*
Bruce Noxon	42,000	14,000	28,000	*/*
Windows of Heaven	92,734	23,183	69,551	*/*
Bob Harmelink	92,614	23,154	69,460	*/*
Walter Webb	23,088	5,772	17,316	*/*
John Rainieri	19,608	4,902	14,706	*/*
Wayland Louie	22,000	5,500	16,500	*/*
Ron Dougherty	29,412	4,902	24,510	*/*
Doug Carli	23,024	5,756	17,268	*/*
Marcus Pelham Webb	85,014	21,253	63,761	*/*
Elizabeth Glancy	88,757	21,500	67,257	*/*
Bob Horton	44,776	11,182	33,594	*/*


Wyatt L. McCulloch	22,796	5,699	17,097	*/*
Mark Hastings	22,796	5,699	17,097	*/*
Helen R. Bradshaw	45,584	11,396	34,188	*/*
Barbara F. Drake	22,740	5,685	17,055	*/*
Dan Hanlon	181,926	45,481	136,445	*/*
KateTim Partners, LTD	80,000	20,000	60,000	*/*
5143 Interests LP	117,648	29,412	88,236	*/*
Robert Holman	22,620	5,651	16,969	*/*
Kenneth Bollweg	22,388	5,597	16,791	*/*
Wilbur G. Lee	22,380	5,595	16,785	*/*

John A. and Paul W. Baughman	43,996	10,996	33,000	*/*
Maria E. Henderson	21,924	5,481	16,443	*/*

Mai N. Pogue - CMG IRA Rollover Custodian	43,634	10,909	32,725	*/*
David Rios	43,410	10,852	32,558	*/*

Equity Trust company Custodian FBO - John Baughman IRA	84,808	21,202	63,606	*/*
Rita Clare Mann	121,122	20,274	100,848	*/*
Anthony Roberts	101,438	25,360	76,078	*/*
Manor Park Care	169,826	42,456	127,370	*/*

Phillip Stewert and Wendy Adams	40,522	10,131	30,391	*/*
Brian Gordon Gregory	20,262	5,065	15,197	*/*
Richard Boyers	12,130	3,033	9,097	*/*
PJ Meegan	40,428	10,107	30,321	*/*
Michael Stevenson	8,076	2,019	6,057	*/*
Roger Martindale	28,348	7,087	21,261	*/*
Martin Deal	20,184	5,046	15,138	*/*
Kishare Shah	24,180	6,045	18,135	*/*
Hydro Plant, Ltd	104,872	28,218	76,654	*/*
Tim Smee	20,222	5,056	15,166	*/*
Anthony T. Paine	228,866	57,214	171,652	*/*
Robert Woolsey	20,184	5,046	15,138	*/*
Roy Roberts	36,384	9,096	27,288	*/*
Mark Mercer	40,270	10,068	30,202	*/*
Atlas Industries	4,032	1,008	3,024	*/*
John Hardwick	20,206	5,052	15,154	*/*
Ian and Madeleine Bibby	40,298	10,074	30,224	*/*
Hassan Iqbal	20,210	5,052	15,158	*/*
James Whiteley Ure	80,536	20,134	60,402	*/*
Gary & Jillian Muglach	80,648	20,162	60,486	*/*
Donald and Jane Miller	80,412	20,103	60,309	*/*
Rodney George	20,124	5,031	15,093	*/*
Vibracoustics, LTD	100,746	25,186	75,560	*/*
Stephen Roberts	8,050	2,012	6,038	*/*
Tony Hay	40,248	10,062	30,186	*/*
Martin Scott	8,012	2,003	6,009	*/*
Henry L and Marianne Nieves	321,976	80,494	241,482	1.5 / 1.2


Gareth Hopkins	8,010	2,002	6,008	*/*
Richard Massey	8,034	2,008	6,026	*/*
Shane Scott	28,010	7,003	21,007	*/*
Martin Daly	8,040	2,010	6,030	*/*
Graham Powell	40,204	10,051	30,153	*/*
Robert Gordon Perkins	8,028	2,007	6,021	*/*
Chris B. Wilson	12,040	3,010	9,030	*/*
James Skalko	44,196	11,049	33,147	*/*
JAS	29,790	4,112	25,678	*/*
Sean Farrelly	20,094	5,024	15,070	*/*
Thomas Forster-Hall	72,368	18,092	54,276	*/*
Valentine Lee	36,068	9,017	27,051	*/*
Todd Havemeister **	152,816	152,816	-0-	*/*
Ron Eiger **	152,816	152,816	-0-	*/*
Susan Bertash**	10,000	10,000	-0-	*/0
Jesup & Lamont**	220,384	220,384	-0-	1.1/0
Bill Corbett**	146,923	146,923	-0-	*/*
Ryan Mitchell**	300	300	-0-	*/0
Greg Ricker**	2,000	2,000	-0-	*/0
John Lane**	801,000	1,000	800,000	3.8/3.8


*	Represents less than one percent of the total number of shares outstanding. The percentage beneficially owned is based upon the number of share outstanding before the offering, plus the number of shares issuable upon exercise of any warrants by the named selling security holder.
**	This Selling Security Holder owns Agency Warrants, with the underlying shares registered for resale.

We are registering shares for resale by the selling security holders in accordance with the registration rights granted to the selling security holders. We will pay the registration and filing fees, printing expenses, listing fees, blue sky fees, if any, and fees and disbursements of our counsel in connection with this offering, but the selling security holders will pay any underwriting discounts, selling commissions and similar expenses relating to the sale of the shares, as well as the fees and expenses of their counsel. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify the selling security holders and certain affiliated parties, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with the offering. Certain selling security holders have agreed to indemnify us against certain losses. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors or officers, or persons controlling our company, we have been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

We will file a prospectus supplement to name any successors to any named selling security holder who are able to use the prospectus to resell the securities. All of the shares being registered for resale by the selling security holders were acquired from us in a private placement transaction, which is summarized under “Certain Transaction.”

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Each Selling Stockholder (the “Selling Stockholders”) of the common stock and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:


	•	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

	•	block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

	•	purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

	•	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

	•	privately negotiated transactions;

	•	settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;

	•	broker-dealers may agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

	•	through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

	•	a combination of any such methods of sale; or

	•	any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with the sale of the common stock or interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares of the common stock short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such

event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed the company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the Common stock. In no event shall any broker-dealer receive fees, commissions and markups which, in the aggregate, would exceed eight percent (8%).

The company is required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the company incident to the registration of the shares. The company has agreed to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

None of the Selling Security Holders is an affiliate of us, and none of them has had a material relationship with us during the past three years, except John D. Lane and Dennis A. Nash are directors of the company and Jesup & Lamont Security Corp. acted as our Placement Agent in connection with an equity offering of $12,052,000, and Susan Bertash, Bill Corbett, Ryan Mitchell, Greg Ricker and John D. Lane are together with Jesup members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or persons associated or affiliated with a FINRA member.

Because Selling Stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act including Rule 172 thereunder. In addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 rather than under this prospectus. There is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of the resale shares by the Selling Stockholders.

We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the shares may be resold by the Selling Stockholders without registration and without regard to any volume or manner-of-sale limitations by reason of Rule 144, without the requirement for the company to be in compliance with the current public information under Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect or (ii) all of the shares have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect. The resale shares will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale shares may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of the common stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

company Capital Stock

At formation of the company in May 2007, the company was authorized to issue:


	•	38,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”);

	•	11,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).

In March 2010, the Board approved and the stockholders ratified an increase in the number of authorized common shares to 65,000,000. To reflect this change, a certificate of amendment to the company’s certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of state of the state of Delaware on March 22, 2010. The company currently has 19,976,560 shares of company Common Stock issued and outstanding. Of the 19,976,560 shares outstanding, 4,475,000 common shares are owned and controlled by Frederick C. Berndt, the company’s Chief Executive Officer. In addition, Mr. Berndt owns and controls Series A Preferred Stock (11,000,000 shares) which have the voting rights of 11,000,000 common shares but no other conversion, dividend, liquidation or other preferential rights over Common Stock. See “Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management”

Class A Warrants

The company has outstanding Class A Warrants to purchase 2,008,667 shares as of April 1, 2010. Each Class A Warrant is exercisable at a price of $4.50 per share through June 30, 2012. The Class A Warrants have anti-dilution protection against stock splits, combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations and the like.

Unclassified Warrants

The company has outstanding unclassified warrants to purchase 3,228,523 shares of Common Stock through June 30, 2012 at an exercise price of $2.55 per share. These Unclassified Warrants also have anti-dilution protection against stock splits, combinations, stock dividends, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations and the like.

Ageny Warrants

In March 2010, the company granted to the Placement Agent of its equity offering 5-year Warrants to purchase 686,239 shares of common stock, exercisable at $3.00 per share. These Warrants have anti-dilution protection the same as our other Warrants. The shares of common stock underlying these warrants are registered for resale by certain Selling Security Holders.

INDEMNIFICATION

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company under Delaware law or otherwise, we have been advised the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than payment by us for expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of our company in successful defense of any action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

As far as exculpation or indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted for directors and officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such exculpation or indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

EXPERTS

The audited financial statements of the company and its subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were audited by RBSM, LLP, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of this firm as expert in accounting and auditing.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the securities offered by this prospectus is being passed upon for us by the law firm of Morse & Morse, PLLC, 1400 Old Country Road, Suite 302, Westbury, NY 11590. The law firm and its members own less than 1% of our outstanding common stock.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At your request, we will provide you, without charge, a copy of any exhibits to its registration statement. If you want more information, write or call us at:

11 Good Energy, Inc.
4450 Belden Village Street, Suite 800, NW
Canton, OH 44718
Telephone: (330) 492-FUEL

Our fiscal year ends on December 31. As of the date of this prospectus, we have become a reporting company and will file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information we file at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. You can receive copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC Internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that, which is contained in this prospectus. Each selling stockholder named herein will be offering to sell shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock.

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and from the period May 23, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009		F-3

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the period from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and from the period May 23, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009		F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6 ~F-25

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of 11 Good Energy, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 11 Good Energy, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”), a development stage company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to the above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 11 Good Energy, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two–year period ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and does not have sufficient cash or working capital to meet anticipated commitments through 2010. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


	/s/ RBSM LLP
New York, New York
April 16, 2010

F-1

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDARY

(a development stage company)

CONSOLDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008


	2009			2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	4,869,749		$	-
Inventory		274,479			11,331
Accounts receivable, net		47,351			-
Other current assets		270,834			45,341

Total current assets		5,462,413			56,672

Property, plant and equipment, net		2,814,591			901,857

Other assets:
Available for sale securities		980,724			-
Intangible assets, net		2,244,448			2,566,651

Total other assets:		3,225,172			2,566,651

Total assets	$	11,502,176		$	3,525,180


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	292,565		$	861,455
Notes payable, related party		25,000			25,000
Convertible notes payable, net of discount		35,000			2,642,721

Total current liabilities		352,565			3,529,176

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Series A Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 11,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		1,100			1,100
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 38,000,000 shares authorized; 15,055,714 and 14,285,714 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively		1,506			1,429
Common stock subscribed-convertible note		6,477,739			-
Common stock subscribed		7,137,223			-
Additional paid in capital		8,793,613			3,638,679
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(10,011,074	)		(3,136,516	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		49,504			-
Due from related party		-			(508,688	)
Treasury stock		(1,300,000	)		-

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		11,149,611			(3,996	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	11,502,176		$	3,525,180

See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

F-2

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


							From May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009
	Years ended December 31,
	2009			2008
REVENUE:
Sales	$	84,218		$	76,730		$	177,934

Cost of sales		75,252			73,904			167,416


Gross profit		8,966			2,826			10,518

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General, selling and administrative expenses		3,580,934			1,131,133			5,230,200
Research and development		238,208			30,373			268,581
Depreciation and amortization		384,402			362,259			809,721

Total operating expenses		4,203,544			1,523,765			6,297,984

NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(4,194,578	)		(1,520,939	)		(6,235,798	)

Other income/(expense):
Interest income		27,324			19,430			55,239
Interest expense		(2,816,353	)		(887,998	)		(3,842,904	)
Realized gain on sale of securities		107,849			-			107,849
Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment		-			-			(34,474	)
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment		1,200			-			1,200


Net loss before provision for income taxes		(6,874,558	)		(2,389,507	)		(10,011,074	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-


NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	(6,874,558	)	$	(2,389,507	)	$	(10,011,074	)


Net loss per common share (basic and fully diluted)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.74	)


Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic and fully diluted)		14,361,659			14,285,714			13,626,748


Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	$	(6,874,558	)	$	(2,389,507	)	$	(10,011,074	)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		49,504			-			49,504


Comprehensive loss	$	(6,825,054	)	$	(2,389,507	)	$	(9,961,571	)

See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

F-3

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

From May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009


													Additional Paid in Capital		Due from Related party			Treasury Stock			Other Comprehensive Income		Accumulated Deficit during Development Stage
	Preferred			Common			Common stock Subscribed - Convertible Note Amount			Common stock Subscribed Amount																Total
	Preferred			Common
	Stock	Amount		Stock	Amount
May 23, 2007, date of inception	11,000,000	$	1,100	9,700,000	$	970		$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	2,070
Common stock issued for services to be rendered	-		-	300,000		30			-			-		155,970		-			-			-		-			156,000
Common stock issued to acquire 11 Good’s Energy LTD	-		-	4,285,714		429			-			-		2,229,736		-			-			-		-			2,230,165
Beneficial conversion feature relating to the issuance of convertible notes	-		-	-		-			-			-		639,719		-			-			-		-			639,719
Increase in due from related party	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		(211,034	)		-			-		-			(211,034	)

Net loss	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		-			-			-		(747,009	)		(747,009	)


Balance, December 31, 2007	11,000,000		1,100	14,285,714		1,429			-			-		3,025,425		(211,034	)		-			-		(747,009	)		2,069,911
Beneficial conversion feature relating to the issuance of convertible notes	-		-	-		-			-			-		613,254		-			-			-		-			613,254
Increase in due from related party	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		(297,654	)		-			-		-			(297,654	)
Net loss	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		-			-			-		(2,389,507	)		(2,389,507	)


Balance, December 31, 2008	11,000,000		1,100	14,285,714		1,429			-			-		3,638,679		(508,688	)		-			-		(3,136,516	)		(3,996	)
Beneficial conversion feature relating to the issuance of convertible notes	-		-	-		-			-			-		2,054,806		-			-			-		-			2,054,806
Common stock to be issued in exchange for convertible notes and accrued interest	-		-	-		-			6,477,739			-		-		-			-			-		-			6,477,739
Compensation of services by a related party	-		-	-		-			-			-		531,000		-			-			-		-			531,000
Compensation of services by a Consultant	-		-	-		-			-			-		59,000		-			-			-		-			59,000

Sale of common stock	-		-	770,000		77			-			7,137,223		2,309,923		-			-			-		-			9,447,223
Fair value of options granted to directors	-		-	-		-			-			-		200,205		-			-			-		-			200,205
Increase in due from related party	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		(278,456	)		-			-		-			(278,456	)
Common stock re-acquired for cash	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		-			(450,000	)		-		-			(450,000	)
Common stock re-acquired for receivable due from related
party and issuance of related party note	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		787,144			(850,000	)		-		-			(62,856	)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		-			-			49,504		-			49,504
Net loss	-		-	-		-			-			-		-		-			-			-		(6,874,558	)		(6,874,558	)


Balance, December 31, 2009	11,000,000	$	1,100	15,055,714	$	1,506		$	6,477,739		$	7,137,223	$	8,793,613	$	-		$	(1,300,000	)	$	49,504	$	(10,011,074	)	$	11,149,611

See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

F-4

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


							From May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009
	Year ended December 31,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss for the period	$	(6,874,558	)	$	(2,389,507	)	$	(10,011,074	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		418,759			364,941			847,207
Amortization of debt discount		2,512,084			688,329			3,307,777
Compensation of services by a related party		531,000			-			531,000
Compensation of services to consultant		59,000			-			59,000
Fair value of options issued for services		200,205			-			200,205
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(1,200	)		-			(1,200	)
Realized gain on sale of securities available for sale		(107,849	)		-			(107,849	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventory		(263,148	)		9,128			(274,479	)
Accounts receivable		(47,351	)		-			(51,524	)
Other current assets		(225,493	)		95,453			(221,925	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(444,399	)		660,953			56,749

Net cash (used in) operating activities		(4,242,950	)		(570,703	)		(5,666,113	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition, net of cash acquired		-			-			(2,930,347	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(450,000	)		-			(450,000	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		3,200			-			3,200
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(1,971,697	)		(781,848	)		(152,247	)
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		204,752			-			204,752
Purchase of securities available for sale		(1,028,123	)		-			(1,028,123	)

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(3,241,868	)		(781,848	)		(4,352,765	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of shares to founders		-			-			2,070
Due from related party		(278,456	)		(297,654	)		(787,144	)
Proceeds from common stock subscription		9,498,023			-			9,498,023
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes		4,830,000			1,600,000			7,930,000
Proceeds from related party note payable		-			25,000			25,000
Payments of notes payable		-			(84,322	)		(84,322	)
Payments of convertible notes		(1,695,000	)		-			(1,695,000	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		12,354,567			1,243,024			14,888,627

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		4,869,749			(109,527	)		4,869,749
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		-			109,527			-


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4,869,749		$	-		$	4,869,749


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	227,109		$	-		$	227,109

Non cash financing activities:
Common stock issued to acquire 11 Good’s Energy, LTD	$	-		$	-		$	2,230,165
Treasury stock received in exchange for related party note receivable and accrued interest	$	787,144		$	-		$	787,144

See the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

F-5

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the presentation of the accompanying financial statements follows:

Basis and business presentation

11 Good Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on May 23, 2007. The Company is in the development stage, as defined by Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 915-10, Development Stage Entities (“ASC 915-10”) and is developing alternative fuel sources, particularly the manufacture and distribution of Bio-fuel products for diesel engine applications. To date, the Company has generated minimal sales revenues, has incurred expenses and has sustained losses. Consequently, its operations are subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. For the period from inception through December 31, 2009, the Company has accumulated a deficit through its development stage of $10,011,074.

On October 23, 2007, the Company acquired 11 Good’s Energy, LTD, a limited liability corporation organized in February 2006.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary 11 Good’s Energy, LTD (“11 Good’s”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Acquisition of 11 Good’s Energy, LTD

On October 23, 2007 the Company acquired all outstanding membership interests of 11 Good’s for a purchase price totally $2,953,295. The Company acquired all the assets and assumed all liabilities of 11 Good’s. There were no contingent payments, options or commitments associated with the acquisition. A summary of consideration is as follows:


Cash	$	500,000
4,285,714 shares of the Company’s common stock		2,230,165
Liabilities assumed		223,130

Total purchase price	$	2,953,295

11 Good’s is an existing biodiesel manufacturer formed in the State of Ohio in February 2006. Historically, 11 Good’s has been in development stage primarily engaged in research activities to develop a proprietary manufacturing process to produce bio-fuel for diesel applications.

The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:

F-6

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)


Cash	$	22,948
Accounts receivable		4,173
Inventory		26,236
Other current assets		119,218
Property, plant and equipment		61,295
Non compete agreement		544,343
Developed core technologies		809,015
In process research and development		1,589,197
Liabilities assumed		(223,130	)

Net Assets acquired	$	2,953,295
Less cash acquired		(22,948	)

Acquisition, net of cash acquired		2,930,347

Details of acquired intangibles are as follows:


Amortizable Intangible Assets	Amount Assigned		Weighted Average Amortization Period	Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Used In Purchase Price Allocation

Non compete agreement	$	544,343	5 years	50.0	%
Developed core technologies		809,015	12 years	50.0	%
In process research & development		1,589,197	10 years	50.0	%

Total	$	2,942,555

The Company believes that the estimated tangible assets represent fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of an asset is defined as the amount for which an asset or liability could be bought or sold in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties when neither party is acting under compulsion.

The Company valued the developed core technologies and in process research and development using a form of the income approach known as the multi-period excess earnings method. This method measures the present value of the future earnings to be generated during the remaining lives of the assets. Expected costs, including income taxes, are deducted from revenues attributed to the asset to arrive at after-tax cash flows. From these cash flows, contributory asset charges are deducted. These charges represent costs of the use of contributory assets (which includes: working capital, fixed assets, workforce and other intangible assets) employed to support the technology-based asset and help in the generation of revenue. The remaining cash flows are discounted to present value and then summed. Then, the value of the amortization tax benefit is added to the sum of the present values to arrive at the fair value of the intangible asset. Based on this methodology the Company assigned the value of developed core technologies at $809,015 and in process research and development at $1,589,197. The Company will amortize these amounts over the estimated useful life of twelve years and ten years, respectively.

F-7

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The Company valued the non-compete agreements using the with and without method of the income approach. This methodology determines the impact on discounted net cash flow should the restricted parties decide to compete directly against the Company. This method requires the use of certain estimates, including projected cash flows, discount rates and probability factors related to the likelihood of future competition. Based on this methodology the Company assigned the value of non-compete agreements at $544,343. The Company will amortize this amount over the estimated useful life of five years.

The estimated fair value of the assets acquired was based upon management’s and independent appraiser’s estimates.

Unaudited proforma information for the acquisition of 11 Good’s has not been presented as the acquisition is not significant to the results of operations for the period from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 30, 2009.

Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosure. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates include management’s assessments of useful lives of assets and related depreciation and amortization methods applied.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-10, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605-10”) which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.

ASC 605-10 incorporates Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements (“ASC 605-25”). ASC 605-25 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing 605-25 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations was not significant.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

F-8

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair Values

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”). ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. ASC 820-10 delays, until the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the effective date for ASC 820-10 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operations. Refer to Footnote 13 for further discussion regarding fair valuation.

Accounts Receivable

The Company assesses the realization of its receivables by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. Through these evaluations, the Company may become aware of a situation where a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial viability, credit ratings or bankruptcy. The Company’s reserve requirements are based on the best facts available to the Company and are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received. The Company’s reserves are also based on amounts determined by using percentages applied to certain aged receivable categories. These percentages are determined by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, current economic trends, historical payment and bad debt write-off experience. Allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable was $-0- as of December 31, 2009.

Available for Sale Securities

Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with the net unrealized gains and losses (that are deemed to be temporary) reported, net of tax, as a component of other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses and charges for other-than-temporary impairments are included in determining net income, with related purchase costs based on the first-in, first-out method.

Segment information

Accounting Standards Codification subtopic Segment Reporting 280-10 (“ASC 280-10”) which establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. ASC 280-10 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company applies the management approach to the identification of our one reportable operating segment as provided in accordance with ASC 280-10. The information disclosed herein materially represents all of the financial information related to the Company’s principal operating segment.

F-9

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Research and Development

The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 730-10, Research and Development (“ASC 730-10”). Under ASC 730-10, all research and development cost must be charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and developments cost is expensed as incurred.

The Company incurred expenditures of $238,208, $30,373 and $268,581 on research and product development for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. When retired or otherwise disposed, the related carrying value and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from disposition, is reflected in earnings. For financial statement purposes, property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360-10”). ASC 360-10 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 360-10 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Income Taxes

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”) which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes include, but not limited to, accounting for intangibles, debt discounts associated with convertible debt, equity based compensation and depreciation and amortization. The adoption of ASC 740-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

F-10

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Comprehensive Income

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 220-10, Comprehensive Income (“ASC 220-10”) which establishes standards for the reporting and displaying of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owners sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. ASC 220-10 requires other comprehensive income (loss) to include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.

Loss per Share

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260-10”) specifying the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements of earnings (loss) per share information. Basic loss per share has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of the diluted loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805-10. The Company assigns to all identifiable assets acquired (including intangible assets), and to all identifiable liabilities assumed, a portion of the cost of the acquired company equal to the estimated fair value of such assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition. The Company records the excess of the cost of the acquired company over the sum of the amounts assigned to identifiable assets acquired less liabilities assumed, if any, as goodwill.

As a result of the acquisition 11 Good’s on October 23, 2007, the Company acquired intangible assets in the aggregate amount of $2,942,555.

The Company allocated $544,343, $809,015 and $1,589,197 to identifiable intangible assets including non compete agreement, developed core technology and in process research and development, respectively.

The Company amortized its identifiable intangible assets using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit. The estimated useful lives of the non compete agreement is five years, the developed core technology is ten years and in process research and development is twelve years. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets and takes into account events or circumstances that warrant revised estimates of useful lives or indicate that impairment exists.

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of 11 Good’s and their carrying values at December 31, 2009 are:

F-11

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)


	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Weighted average Amortization Period (Years)

Non compete agreement	$	544,343	$	235,882	$	308,461	5
Developed core technology		809,015		175,287		633,728	10
In process research and development		1,589,197		286,938		1,302,259	12

Total	$	2,942,555	$	698,107	$	2,244,448

Total amortization expense charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $322,203 and $322,203, respectively. Estimated amortization expense is as follows:


Year ended December 31,
2010	$	322,203
2011		322,203
2012		304,058
2013		213,335
2014 and after		1,082,649

Total	$	2,244,448

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

Dependency on key management

The future success or failure of the Company is dependent primarily upon the continued services of its key executives and founder, in particular, the services of efforts Frederick C. Berndt, Chief Executive Officer, Gary R. Smith, the company’s Chief Operations Officer, and Daniel T. Lapp, the company’s Chief Financial Officer. The ability of the company to pursue its business strategy effectively will also depend upon, among other factors, the successful recruitment and retention of additional highly skilled and experienced managerial, marketing, engineering and technical personnel. There can be no assurance that the company will be able to retain or recruit such personnel.

Stock based compensation

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 718-10, Compensation (“ASC 718-10”) which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro-forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. This statement does not change the accounting guidance for share based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in ASC 505-50. On July 22, 2009, the Company granted 500,000 fully vested options to directors to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $3.00 per share over three years. The fair value of $200,205 was charged to current period operations.

F-12

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIBARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (Topic 855)” (“2010-09”). 2010-09 clarifies the interaction of Accounting Standards Codification 855 “Subsequent Events” (“Topic 855”) with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as well as the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events found in paragraph 855-10-50-4 in Topic 855. This update is effective for annual or interim periods ending after June 15, 2010. Management is currently evaluating whether these changes will have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-08 “Technical Corrections to Various Topics” (“2010-08”). 2010-08 represents technical corrections to SEC paragraphs within various sections of the Codification. Management is currently evaluating whether these changes will have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“2010-06”). 2010-06 requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and disclosures regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, on a gross basis, for Level 3 fair value measurements. 2010-06 also calls for further disaggregation of all assets and liabilities based on line items shown in the statement of financial position. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating whether adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-05 “Compensation—Stock Compensation—Escrowed Share Arrangements and Presumption of Compensation” (“2010-05”). 2010-05 re-asserts that the Staff of the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC Staff”) has stated the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share represent a compensatory arrangement. 2010-05 further clarifies the criteria required to be met to establish a position different from the SEC Staff’s position. The Company does not believe this pronouncement will have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-04 “Accounting for Various Topics—Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs” (“2010-04”). 2010-04 represents technical corrections to SEC paragraphs within various sections of the Codification. Management is currently evaluating whether these changes will have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2010 the FASB issued Update No. 2010-02 “Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary—a Scope Clarification” (“2010-02”) an update of ASC 810 “Consolidation.” 2010-02 clarifies the scope of ASC 810 with respect to decreases in ownership in a subsidiary to those of a: subsidiary or group of assets that are a business or nonprofit, a subsidiary that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture, and an exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity to a non-controlling interest including an equity method investee or a joint venture. Management, does not expect adoption of this standard to have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations or operating cash flows. Management does not intend to decrease its ownership in wholly-owned subsidiary.

F-13

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN MATTERS

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, from May 23, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009 the Company incurred net losses attributable to common shareholders of $10,011,074 and used $5,406,854 in cash for operating activities. In addition, the Company anticipates its cash balance to be insufficient to support its operations and capital expenditure commitments for the next 12 months. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations and acquiring other sources of financing. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to developing its products and services and acquiring these additional financing sources, there can be no assurance that the Company’s efforts will be successful. The planned principal operations have not commenced and no assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems.

NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost is determined using the first-in first-out method. Costs of finished goods inventory include costs associated with the procurement and transportation of Soybean oil and other raw materials used in the manufacture of G2 Diesel. Costs of inventories are reduced by applicable government excise tax rebates.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, inventories consisted of the following:


	2009		2008

Raw materials	$	174,152	$	11,331
Finished fuel		100,247		-

Total	$	274,479	$	11,331

NOTE 4 – OTHER CURRENTASSETS

Other assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are comprised of the following:


	2009		2008

Prepaid inventory	$	110,000	$	-
Prepaid fuel/product testing		99,925		-
Prepaid consulting		45,000		39,000
Prepaid other		9,568		-
Accounts receivable, other		4,178		4,178
Rental deposit		2,163		2,163

Total	$	270,834	$	45,341

F-14

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 5 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The Company’s property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consist of the following:


	2009		2008

Leasehold improvements	$	345,381	$	278,902
Factory equipment		2,305,475		501,029
Furniture and fixtures		21,709		12,458
Office equipment		20,545		18,777
Vehicles		91,642		26,300
Computer equipment and software		138,243		76,239
Web design		40,250		40,250

Total		2,963,245		953,955
Less accumulated depreciation		148,654		52,098

Net	$	2,814,591		901,857

Property and equipment are recorded on the basis of cost. For financial statement purposes, property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.

Expenditures for repair and maintenance which do not materially extend the useful lives of property and equipment are charged to operations. When property or equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts with the resulting gain or loss reflected in operations. Management periodically reviews the carrying value of its property and equipment for impairment.

Depreciation expense was $96,556 and $42,737 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which $34,357 and $2,682 was included as part of cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

NOTE 6 – AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES

Cost and fair value of marketable equity securities at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:


	2009		2008

Available for sale securities:
Equity securities:
Fair value	$	980,724	$	-
Total gains in accumulated other comprehensive income		49,504		-

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company realized an aggregate realized gain of $107,849 with the sales of marketable securities. Unrealized gains (losses) are accounted for as other comprehensive income (loss).

F-15

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 7 – NOTE PAYABLE, RELATED PARTY

Note payable, related party is due to shareholder and officer and is comprised of a non interest bearing demand note. The note was issued in exchange for acquisition of treasury shares.

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Since inception, the Company issued an aggregate of $7,930,000 unsecured convertible notes payable due June 30, 2009 bearing interest at 8% per annum.

The convertible notes payable (which include principal and accrued interest thereon) are convertible at a price (the “Conversion Price”) based upon a 15% discount to the next established equity offering price per share (the “Conversion Shares”).

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 470-20, Debt-Debt With Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”), the Company recognized an embedded beneficial conversion feature present in the notes. The Company allocated a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid-in capital. The Company recognized and measured an aggregate of $2,353,595 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes. The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is amortized over the notes’ maturity period (till June 30, 2009) as interest expense.

In connection with the issuance of the notes, the Company issued a commitment to issue detachable warrants granting the holders the right to acquire an aggregate of 3,206,956 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.55 per share. The warrants expire on June 30, 2012. In accordance with ASC 470-20, the Company recognized the value attributable to the warrants in the amount of $954,184 to additional paid in capital and a discount against the notes. The Company valued the warrant commitment in accordance with ASC 470-20 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions: contractual terms of 3 to 5 years, an average risk free interest rate of 1.30% to 4.22%, a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility of 110.19% to 162.99%. The debt discount attributed to the value of the warrant commitment issued is amortized over the notes’ maturity period (till June 30, 2009) as interest expense.

Amortization of $2,512,085 and $688,329 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company paid $1,695,000 in settlement of certain convertible notes. No gain or loss was recorded in the settlement of the notes.

F-16

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (continued)

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has issued an aggregate of 2,540,290 shares of its common stock in settlement of $6,477,739 convertible notes payable and accrued interest. The value of the common shares issued did not materially differ from the face value of the convertible notes and accrued interest.

As of December 31, 2009; the Company has a remaining $35,000 convertible note payable. The remaining convertible note was paid and or converted as of January 31, 2010, completing the conversion of debt to common stock.

The following schedule presents the convertible note balance for the years ending:


	2009		2008

Convertible Notes payable		35,000		3,100,000
Unamortized debt discount		-		(457,279	)

		35,000		2,642,721

NOTE 9 – CAPITAL STOCK

Preferred stock

On June 22, 2007, the Board of Directors designated 11,000,000 shares as Series A preferred stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), with a par value of $0.0001 per share. The preferred stock is not entitled to any preference upon liquidation, dividend rights and has no conversion rights into the Company’s common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote equivalent to one share of common stock on the record date for the vote or consent of shareholders, and with respect to such vote, each holder of Series A Preferred Stock shall have full voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of the Company’s common stock.

On June 22, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,000,000 shares of preferred stock to founders for activities prior to the formation of the Company and relating to its incorporation. The founders paid par value for the stock.

Common stock

On May 23, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,700,000 shares of common stock to founders for activities prior to the formation of the Company and relating to its incorporation. The founders paid par value for the stock.

On June 27, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 300,000 shares of common stock in exchange for future services. The fair value of the common stock was determined by management in consultation with an independent appraiser and did not differ materially from the services to be provided.

On October 23, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,285,714 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition of 11 Good’s. As described in Note 1, fair value of the common shares issued was determined by management in consultation with an independent appraiser.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has received net proceeds of $9,498,023, through the subscription for the sale of units of common stock or warrants consisting of 3,701,333 shares of common stock and 1,850,667 warrants.

F-17

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 10 – OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Employee options:

The following table summarizes options outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees at December 31, 2009:


		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price

$	3.00		500,000		2.55	$	3.00		500,000	$	3.00

Transactions involving stock options issued to non employees are summarized as follows:


	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Price Per Share

Outstanding at December 31, 2007:		-	$
Granted		-
Exercised		-
Canceled or expired		-

Outstanding at December 31, 2008:		-
Granted		500,000		3.00
Exercised		-
Canceled or expired		-		-

Outstanding at December 31, 2009:		500,000	$	3.00

On July 22, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 500,000 fully vested employee stock options to directors in connection with services rendered at the exercise price of $3.00 over three years.

The fair values of the vesting non employee options were determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:


Dividend yield:	-0-%
Volatility	161.79%
Risk free rate:	1.50%
Expected option life	3 years

The fair value of $200,205 was charged to current period operations.

F-18

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 10 – OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)

Warrants

The following table summarizes in warrants outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees at December 31, 2009:


		Warrants Outstanding						Warrants Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price

$	2.55		3,206,956		2.50	$	2.55		3,206,956	$	2.55

Transactions involving warrants issued are summarized as follows:


	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Price Per Share


Outstanding at December 31, 2007:		-	$
Granted		-
Exercised		-
Canceled or expired		-

Outstanding at December 31, 2008:		-
Granted		3,206,956		2.55
Exercised		-
Canceled or expired		-		-

Outstanding at December 31, 2009:		3,206,956	$	2.55

In connection with the issuance of convertible notes (see Note 8 above), the Company issued a commitment to issue detachable warrants granting the holders the right to acquire an aggregate of 3,206,956 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.55 per share. The warrants expire on June 30, 2012. The Company valued the warrant commitment in accordance with ASC 470-20 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions: contractual terms of 3 to 5 years, an average risk free interest rate of 1.30% to 4.95%, a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility of 105.07% to 162.99%. The debt discount attributed to the value of the warrant commitment issued is amortized over the notes’ maturity period (till June 30, 2009) as interest expense. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the issued an aggregate of 3,206,956 warrants in connection with the convertible notes.

F-19

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment and consulting contracts

The Company entered into employment agreements with certain officers and employees of the Company each for a term ranging from 12 to 36 months. Total annual base salaries under these agreements are $551,000.

In the event certain employment agreements are terminated other than for cause, the company shall pay a lump sum on the date of termination, severance compensation to the executive in an amount equal to the sum of executive’s salary and bonus paid in the prior fiscal year. In the event the employment contract expires and the executive is not rehired in the same position under the terms and conditions of a new executive employment agreement mutually acceptable to the parties or in the event executive dies or becomes disabled, the company shall pay in lump sum on the date of termination severance compensation in an amount equal to the sum of executive’s salary and bonus paid in the prior fiscal year. In addition, executive (except in the case of his death) shall be entitled to continue health benefits for a period of 18 months or until the executive is employed full time with another employer.

The Company has entered into consulting agreements with individuals responsible for creating political liaisons, government agency and investor relations. The agreements are generally for a term of one year or less from inception and renewable unless either the Company or the consultant terminates such agreement by written notice. The Company incurred $750,996 and $289,190 in fees to these individuals for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in a consulting role.

The Company has two commitments for business consulting services. One contract is from October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010 at a rate of $20,000 per month. The other is from March 31, 2009 through March 31, 2010 at a rate of $30,000 per month, generating a total commitment of $270,000 for 2010.

Lease contracts

The Company leases its office space and warehouse facility for $4,501 per month through August 31, 2011. The Company has determined not to record deferred rent in order to recognize rent expense over the term of the lease on a straight line basis, as the amount has been determined to be immaterial to the overall consolidated financial statements. Rent expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $35,376 and $26,552, respectively. The renegotiated lease payments are reflected in the table below.

Future minimum lease payments are as follows for the year ending December 31:


Year ended December 31,
2010	$	54,012
2011		36,008

Total	$	90,020

Litigation

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Except as described below, we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

F-20

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Due from related party

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Frederick C. Berndt entered into a revolving note agreement with the Company beginning on November 11, 2007. The Company initiated the note arrangement to allow Mr. Berndt to assist the Company, primarily in the early stages of development, personally with operating capital as required. In addition, the Company initiated the note to allow the Company to assist Mr. Berndt with cash advances used for costs incurred during the process of improving the Company’s marketing, political and regulatory exposure. The cash advances exceeded the amounts of reimbursable costs resulting in amounts Mr. Berndt owed back to the Company. Mr. Berndt has agreed to reimburse the Company for the excess costs of these promotions. These costs consisted primarily of travel and sponsorship costs. The Company charges 5% interest per annum calculated on the last day of the year based on a average of the quarterly balance of the note. The balance of the note including interest of $27,915 becomes due on December 31, 2009, with a term of 30 days to settle the note payable.

On December 15, 2009, the Company accepted 425,000 shares of the Company’s common stock held by Mr. Berndt in full settlement of the outstanding note receivable and related accrued interest for $787,144 and recorded an obligation to Mr. Berndt for $62,856. The fair value of the shares issued was determined based on the recent sale of the Company’s common stock.

Consistent with ASC 505-10-45 (“Equity-Other Presentation”), the amount recorded on the balance sheet is presented as a deduction from stockholders’ equity (deficit). This is also consistent with Rule 5-02.30 of Regulation S-X of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Facilities

Since April 1, 2008, the Company has occupied warehouse space provided by one of the Company’s founders. The Company agreed to pay a total of $1 per month for the space. The Company records this fee as rent expense when incurred. During this time period, the Company constructed a leasehold improvement to the leased warehouse space for the purpose of locating our bio- fuel manufacturing facility.

Donated Capital

During the year ended December 31, 2009; the Company’s Chief Executive Officer transferred 100,000 personally owned shares of the Company’s common stock for services rendered to the Company by an outside consultant and 900,000 shares to members of the board of directors. The fair value of $531,000 was charged to operations with an offset to additional paid in capital.

NOTE 13 – FAIR VALUE

ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

F-21

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Items recorded or measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consisted of the following items as of December 31, 2009:


	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2	Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3 (A)

Assets:
Securities available for sale	$	980,724	$	980,724

Total		980,724		980,724

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 825-10 prospectively effective as of the beginning of Fiscal 2008. For financial assets and liabilities included within the scope of ASC 825-10, the Company will be required to adopt the provisions of ASC 825-10 prospectively as of the beginning of Fiscal 2009. The adoption of ASC 825-10 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The fair value of the assets, securities available for sale, at December 31, 2009 was grouped as Level 1 valuation as the market price was readily available.

F-22

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”) which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes include, but not limited to, accounting for intangibles, debt discounts associated with convertible debt, equity based compensation and depreciation and amortization.

At December 31, 2009, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $8,203,572, expiring in the year 2029, that may be used to offset future taxable income. The Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the earnings history of the Company; it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized. Based upon the change in ownership rules under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, if in the future the Company issues common stock or additional equity instruments convertible in common shares which result in an ownership change exceeding the 50% limitation threshold imposed by that section, all of the Company's net operating losses carryforwards may be significantly limited as to the amount of use in a particular years. Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009 are as follows. All or portion of the remaining valuation allowance may be reduced in future years based on an assessment of earnings sufficient to fully utilize these potential tax benefits.

At December 31, 2009, the significant components of the deferred tax assets (liabilities) are summarized below:


Net operating loss carry forwards expiring in 2029	$	8,203,572


Tax Asset		2,871,250
Less valuation allowance		(2,871,250	)


Balance	$	—


Net operating loss carry forwards 2007	$	484,034
Net operating loss carry forwards 2008		969,980
Net operating loss carry forwards 2009		6,749,558

Balance	$	8,203,572

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has no unrecognized tax benefit, including interest and penalties.

F-23

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES (continued)

The difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory corporate tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:


	December 31,

	2009			2008

Statutory federal income tax rate		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income taxes and other		0.0	%		0.0	%


Effective tax rate		35.0	%		35.0	%

Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expenses for the financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences representing deferred tax asset and liabilities result principally from the following:


		December 31,

		2009		2008

Deferred Tax Asset: (Liability)

Net operating loss carryforward		$	2,821,500		398,440
Depreciation			26,250		12,637
Travel and entertainment;			17,500		8,948

Deferred compensation and taxes			-		88,880

	Subtotal		2,871,250		508,905

Valuation allowance			2,871,250		508,905


Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability)		$	-	$	-

F-24

11 GOOD ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated through April 13, 2010, a date that the financial statements were issued.

On February 2, 2010, the Board of Directors elected to cancel the options granted to GLEN SHAFFERT, a former Board member. These options were for a period of 3 years and priced at $3.00 per share.

In February 2010, the Company agreed to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock held by Surge Global Energy, Inc, an investor in 11 Good Energy, Inc. The purchase price was $122,500 ($2.45 per share). The Company has recorded the transaction at cost to Treasury Stock.

As of March 15, 2010, the company completed financing of $10,847,000 from the sale of 4,017,333 shares of common stock at a price of $3.00 per share

As of March 15, 2010, the company converted $6,498,708 of convertible notes payable to common stock at a price of $2.55 per share, or 2,548,513 shares and the entire remaining balance of convertible notes was redeemed, with principle and accrued interest paid to each redeeming note holder.

In April of 2010, the company issued placement agent warrants to purchase 686,239 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $2.55 to 4.50 per share.

F-25

PART II — INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, if any, payable by the Company relating to the sale of common stock being registered. All amounts are estimates except the SEC registration fee:


SEC Registration Fee		$254.62
Edgar and Printing		$5,000.00*
Legal Fees and Expenses		$35,000.00*
Accounting Fees and Expenses		$*
Miscellaneous Expenses		$*

Total		$250,000**

____________________________

*	To be filed by amendment
**	Estimated

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

Section 102 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware permits a corporation to eliminate the personal liability of directors of a corporation to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached his duty of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit. The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides that a director of the Company shall not be personally liable to it or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent that such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware as currently in effect or as the same may hereafter be amended.

Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation and other persons serving at the request of the corporation in related capacities against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlements actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with an action, suit or proceeding to which he is or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such position, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful, except that, in the case of actions brought by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court determines that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnify for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.

The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, as amended from time to time, indemnify each person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was, or has agreed to become, a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer, partner, employee or trustee of, or in a similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including any employee benefit plan) (all such persons being referred to hereafter as an “Indemnitee”), or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such capacity, against all expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of an Indemnitee in connection with such action, suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom.

II-1

As a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to be indemnified, the Indemnitee must notify the Corporation in writing as soon as practicable of any action, suit, proceeding or investigation involving such Indemnitee for which indemnity will or could be sought. With respect to any action, suit, proceeding or investigation of which the Corporation is so notified, the Corporation will be entitled to participate therein at its own expense and/or to assume the defense thereof at its own expense, with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnitee.

In the event that the Corporation does not assume the defense of any action, suit, proceeding or investigation of which the Corporation receives notice under this Article, the Corporation shall pay in advance of the final disposition of such matter any expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an Indemnitee in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, proceeding or investigation or any appeal therefrom; provided, however, that the payment of such expenses incurred by an Indemnitee in advance of the final disposition of such matter shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay all amounts so advanced in the event that it shall ultimately be determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized in this Article, which undertaking shall be accepted without reference to the financial ability of the Indemnitee to make such repayment; and further provided that no such advancement of expenses shall be made under this Article if it is determined that (i) the Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, or (ii) with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

The Corporation shall not indemnify an Indemnitee pursuant to this Article in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such Indemnitee unless the initiation thereof was approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation shall not indemnify an Indemnitee to the extent such Indemnitee is reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, and in the event the Corporation makes any indemnification payments to an Indemnitee and such Indemnitee is subsequently reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, such Indemnitee shall promptly refund such indemnification payments to the Corporation to the extent of such insurance reimbursement.

All determinations hereunder as to the entitlement of an Indemnitee to indemnification or advancement of expenses shall be made in each instance (a) by a majority vote of the directors of the Corporation consisting of persons who are not at that time parties to the action, suit or proceeding in question (“disinterested directors”), whether or not a quorum, (b) by a committee of disinterested directors designated by majority vote of disinterested directors, whether or not a quorum, (c) if there are no disinterested directors, or if the disinterested directors so direct, by independent legal counsel (who may, to the extent permitted by law, be regular legal counsel to the Corporation) in a written opinion, or (d) by the stockholders of the Corporation.

The rights provided in this Article (i) shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which an Indemnitee may be entitled under any law, agreement or vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, and (ii) shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of the Indemnitees. The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by its Board of Directors, grant indemnification rights to other employees or agents of the Corporation or other persons serving the Corporation and such rights may be equivalent to, or greater or less than, those set forth in this Article.

The company’s By-laws provide for indemnification to the full extent permitted by Delaware law.

The Company has purchased certain liability insurance for its officers and directors.

II-2

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

The following table provides information about the sales of unregistered securities for the past three years.

Date of Sale	Title of Security	Number Sold	Consideration Received and Description of Underwriting or Other Discounts to Market Price or Convertible Security, Afforded to Purchasers	Exemption from Registration Claimed	If Option, Warrant or Convertible Security, terms of exercise or conversion
May 2007	Common stock	10,000,000 Shares	$1,000; no commissions paid.	Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506.	Not applicable.
May 2007	Preferred Stock	11,000,000	$1,000; no Commissions paid	Section 4(2) and/or Rule 506.	Not applicable.
2007 - 2009	Debentures	$7,930,000 Debentures	$643,700 of finder’s fees and commissions paid	Rule 506.	Notes are convertible at $2.55 per share. Each note holder also received one warrant exercisable at $2.55 per share and expiring June 30, 2012 for each common share issued or issuable upon conversion of the note.
2009 and 2010	Common stock and warrants	4,017,333 shares and 2,008,667 Warrants	$12,052,000; $1,205,200 commission paid	Rule 506	Warrants exercisable at $4.50 per share through June 30, 2012
2009 and 2010	Common stock and warrants	2,548,513 shares; 3,228,523 warrants	Conversion of debt totaling $6,498,708; no commissions paid	Section 3(a)(9)	Warrants exercisable at $2.55 per share through June 30, 2012.
2010	Placement Agent Warrants	380,607 Warrants	Services rendered	Section 4(2)	Five year Warrants exercisable at $3.00 per share.
2009	Common stock options	500,000	Services rendered; no commissions paid	Section 4(2)	Three year options exercisable at $3.00 per share.

II-3

Item 16. Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed herewith unless otherwise noted:

Exhibit
No.

Description of Exhibit

All exhibits are filed herewith.

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Organization between Registrant and 11 Good Energy, LTD.

2.2

Corrections to Exhibit 2.1

3.1

Certification of Incorporation

3.2

By-Laws

3.3

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation

3.4

Certificate of Designation

5.1

Legal Opinion

10.1

Employment Contract - Frederick C. Berndt

10.2

Employment Contract - Daniel Lapp

10.3

Employment Contract - Aaron Harnar

10.4

Consulting Agreement with Clayton R. Livengood

10.5

Employment Agreement - Gary R. Smith

10.6

Finder's Agreement - Jesup Lamont

10.7

Consulting Agreement with Capital Keys

10.8

Consulting Agreement with California Strategies

21.1

Subsidiary of Registrant

23.1

Consent of Morse & Morse PLLC - See Exhibit 5.1

23.2

Consent of Accountant

II-4

Item 17. Undertakings.

(a)	The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(1)	To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
	(i)	To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;
	(ii)	To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of this registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement;
	(iii)	To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

	(2)		That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

	(3)		To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

	(4)	That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

(b)		Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by them is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-5

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in Canton, Ohio on April 15, 2010.


		11 GOOD ENERGY, INC.

		By: Name:		/s/ Frederick C. Berndt Frederick C. Berndt
		Title:		President & Chief Executive Officer
				(principal executive officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Frederick C. Berndt and Daniel T. Lapp and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including his capacity as a director and/or officer of 11 Good Energy, Inc.) to sign any or all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement and any and all additional registration statements pursuant to rule 462(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto each said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name/Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Frederick C. Berndt Frederick C. Berndt	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)	April 15, 2010

/s/ Daniel T. Lapp Daniel T. Lapp	Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)	April 15, 2010

/s/ Gary R. Smith Gary R. Smith	Chief Operating Officer and Director	April 15, 2010

/s/ John D. Lane John D. Lane	Director	April 15, 2010

/s/ Dennis A. Nash Dennis A. Nash	Director	April 15, 2010

II-6

11 GOOD ENERGY INC - FORM S-1 - April 16, 2010

Attached files

11 GOOD ENERGY INC Reports