TAMALPAIS BANCORP - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-1 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex_.htm
EX-21 - EXHIBIT 21 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex_21.htm
EX-23 - EXHIBIT 23 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex_23.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex32_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex31_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex31_1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - TAMALPAIS BANCORP	ex32_2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x:	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 000-50878

TAMALPAIS BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California	68- 0175592
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

630 Las Gallinas Avenue, San Rafael, California 94903
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number including area code: (415) 526-6400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on which Registered

Common Stock, No Par Value	NASDAQ Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller Reporting Company x

(Do not check if a Smaller Reporting Company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of June, 30, 2009 was $17,904,461.

The number of registrant’s shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 10, 2010 was 3,823,634.

The following documents are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K: Items 10 through 14 of registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		PAGE
	PART I

Item 1.	Business	4

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	21

Item 2.	Properties	30

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	30

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	30

	PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	31

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	33

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	73

Item 8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	74

Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	125

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	125

Item 9B.	Other Information	127

	PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	127

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	127

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	127

Item 13.	Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence	127

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	128

	PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	128

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to the historical information, this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with respect to the financial condition, results of operation and business of Tamalpais Bancorp and its subsidiaries. Actual results may differ materially from management expectations, projections and estimates. These include, but are not limited to, statements that relate to or are dependent on estimates or assumptions relating to the prospects of loan growth, capital raising transactions, credit quality, capital adequacy, liquidity, reduction of loan concentrations, diversification of the deposit base, sales of nonperforming loans, changes in securities or financial markets, and certain operating efficiencies resulting from the operations of Tamalpais Bank and Tamalpais Wealth Advisors. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) regulatory actions that impact our holding company and bank subsidiary including the Order and the Directive issued with respect to our subsidiary, Tamalpais Bank, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and California Department of Financial Institutions, and the FRB Agreement between the Company and the Federal Reserve, and our ability to comply with these regulatory actions; (2) higher than expected credit losses; (3) our ability to enhance the capital ratios of the Bank and the Company; (4) our ability to diversify our loan portfolio; (5) our ability to reduce reliance on wholesale funding and generate low cost deposits from our market area; (6) competitive pressure among financial services companies increases significantly; (7) the failure to regain compliance with NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements within the grace period provided under NASDAQ rules, in which case, our shares of common stock would be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market; (8) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins; (9) general economic conditions, internationally, nationally or in the State of California are less favorable than expected; (10) legislation or regulatory requirements, regulatory actions against us, or changes adversely affect the businesses in which the consolidated organization is or will be engaged; (11) the ability to satisfy the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and other regulations governing internal controls; (12) decline in real estate values in the Company’s operating market areas; (13) volatility or significant changes in the equity and bond markets which can affect our ability to raise capital and the overall growth and profitability of the wealth advisors business; (14) our ability to sell nonperforming loans or sell such loans on terms acceptable to the Company; (15) changes in the quality or composition of Tamalpais Bank’s loan and investment portfolios; (16) changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; (17) asset/liability management risks and liquidity risks; and, (18) other risks detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to the Company, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect future events or developments.

Moreover, wherever phrases such as or similar to “the Company projects”, “In management’s opinion”, or “management considers” are used, such statements are as of and based upon the knowledge of management at the time made and are subject to change by the passage of time and/or subsequent events and, accordingly, such statements are subject to the same risks and uncertainties noted above with respect to forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

On October 28, 2008, the Board of Directors of Tamalpais Bancorp (the “Company”) elected to apply to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to become a bank holding company (“BHC”). On the same date, the Board of Directors of Tamalpais Bank (the “Bank”) elected to apply to the California Department of Financial Institutions (“CDFI”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to convert the Bank’s charter from a California industrial bank to a California state commercial bank. On January 8, 2009, the Company received the written consent from a majority of its shareholders to amend its Articles of Incorporation to authorize a class of preferred stock.

On January 30, 2009, the Company filed amended Articles of Incorporation of the Bank with the Secretary of State of the State of California whereby the Bank converted from a California industrial bank to a California state chartered commercial bank. On January 30, 2009, the Company also notified the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the FDIC that the amendment to the Bank’s Articles of Incorporation amending the purpose clause to provide that the Bank is authorized to conduct a commercial banking business was filed with the California Secretary of State.

Accordingly, as of January 30, 2009, the Bank is now a commercial bank and the transaction by which the Company became a BHC was consummated as of that date.

As of December 31, 2009, the subsidiaries of the Company consisted of the Bank and Tamalpais Wealth Advisors (“TWA”), both of which are consolidated subsidiaries. The Company has entered into an agreement for the disposition of TWA. See “Tamalpais Wealth Advisors” of this Report. San Rafael Capital Trusts II and III (the “Trusts”) are wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries which were formed during 2006 and 2007, respectively. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Company’s outstanding equity securities consist of one class of no par value, Common Stock. The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 630 Las Gallinas Avenue, San Rafael, California, 94903, telephone number (415) 526-6400, facsimile number (415) 485-3742. The Company makes available free of charge on its website at www.tambancorp.com its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments thereto, and reports of insider transactions on Forms 3, 4, and 5 as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company, or insiders, as the case may be, file such reports with, or furnishes them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Investors are encouraged to access these reports and the other information about the Company’s business on its website. The Company may also be contacted via electronic mail at info@tambancorp.com.

Regulatory Action

We have determined that significant additional sources of liquidity and capital will be required for us to continue operations through 2010 and beyond. We have engaged a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives, including potential significant capital raises, to address our current and expected liquidity and capital deficiencies. However, to date we have been unable to raise additional capital and failed to meet certain deadlines to increase capital imposed by our regulators as described in more detail below. There can be no assurance that we will be able to arrange for sufficient liquidity or to raise additional capital in time to satisfy regulatory requirements and meet our obligations as they come due. In addition, our regulators are continually monitoring our liquidity and capital adequacy. Based on their assessment of our ability to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner, our regulators may take other and further action to that described below, including assumption of control of Tamalpais Bank, to protect the interests of depositors insured by the FDIC.

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 17, 2009, the Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent (“Consent”) agreeing to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (“Order”) by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the California Department of Financial Institutions (“CDFI”). Based upon our Consent, the FDIC and the CDFI jointly issued the Order on September 14, 2009.

The Order is a formal corrective action pursuant to which the Bank has agreed to address specific areas through the adoption and implementation of procedures, plans and policies designed to enhance the safety and soundness of the Bank. These affirmative actions include, among others, the implementation of a capital plan which specifies how the bank will attain and maintain a Tier I capital ratio of not less than 9% and a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of not less than 12% by December 31, 2009, a contingency plan in the event that the Bank has not adequately complied with the capital requirements; have and retain qualified management of the Bank, assess management and staffing needs, qualifications and performance; maintain a fully funded allowance for loan losses; reduce commercial real estate loans; review, revise and adhere to the Bank’s loan policy, develop a liquidity funds management policy; not accept, renew or roll-over brokered deposits without obtaining regulatory approval; not pay cash dividends without regulatory approval; and furnish quarterly progress reports to the FDIC and CDFI regarding its compliance with the Order.

The Order specifies certain timeframes for meeting the requirements of the Order. The Bank has established a Board Oversight committee to monitor and coordinate compliance with the Order and such remedial measures are in process. The Order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC and the CDFI. We have not achieved the Tier I Capital or Total Risk-Based Capital Ratios required under the Order by December 31, 2009 nor have we reduced the Bank’s assets classified as “substandard” in relation to Tier I Capital plus the allowance for loan losses to not more than 100 percent by March 12, 2010. The failure to comply with the terms of the Order could result in significant enforcement actions against the Bank of increasing severity, up to and including a regulatory takeover of the Bank.

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “Federal Reserve”) effective January 14, 2010 (the “FRB Agreement”). The FRB Agreement generally provides for the development and implementation of actions to ensure the Bank complies with the Order, and any other supervisory action taken by the Bank’s federal or state regulators. Among other things, the FRB Agreement requires the Company to:

	●	Not declare or pay any dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors (the “Division Director”);
	●	Not make any distribution of interest, principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Division Director;
	●	Not incur, increase, or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve;
	●	Submit a written capital plan to the Federal Reserve within 60 days of the FRB Agreement;
	●	Provide a written statement regarding cash flow projections for 2010 within 60 days of the FRB Agreement and submit a cash flow projection for each calendar year thereafter;
	●	Comply with notice and approval requirements under applicable law and regulations relating to the appointment of directors, senior executive officers as well as any change in the responsibilities of any senior executive officers; and,
	●	Comply with the restrictions on indemnification and severance payments under applicable law and regulations.

The FRB Agreement specifies certain timeframes for meeting the requirements of the FRB Agreement. The Company has established an oversight committee to monitor and coordinate compliance with the FRB Agreement and responsive actions have been taken. The FRB Agreement will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the Federal Reserve. The failure to comply with the terms of the FRB Agreement could result in significant enforcement actions against the Company.

On March 12, 2010, the Company submitted to the FRB a written capital plan and a written statement regarding cash flow projections for 2010.

The Directive provides that within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. While the Company has not yet raised capital and no assurance can be given that it will be successful in its efforts to recapitalize the Bank, the Company has been, with the assistance of its investment banking firm, actively engaged in seeking additional capital from various sources.

The Directive also prohibits the Bank from: (1) paying interest on deposits in excess of prescribed limits; (2) accepting, renewing or rolling over any brokered deposits; (3) allowing its average total assets during any calendar quarter to exceed its average total assets during the preceding calendar quarter; (4) making any capital distributions or dividend payments to the Company or any affiliate of the Bank or the Company; and (5) establishing or acquiring a new branch and requires the Bank to obtain the approval of the FDIC prior to relocating, selling or disposing of any existing branch. In addition, the Directive provides that the Bank may not pay any bonus to, or increase the compensation of, any director or officer of the Bank without the prior approval of the FDIC, and the Bank must comply with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act without the exemption for transactions with certain affiliated institutions. Lastly the Bank may not enter into any material transaction, including any investment, expansion, acquisition, sale of assets or other similar transaction which would have a significant financial impact on the Bank without prior approval of the FDIC. The Bank was already substantially subject to each of these prohibitions prior to the issuance of the Directive, and since last year, key components of the Bank’s business strategy have included the reduction in its asset base and brokered deposits.

The failure to comply with the terms of the Directive could result in a regulatory takeover of the Bank. The Company’s principal assets are the capital stock of the Bank and it is not likely the Company would receive any recovery after such a regulatory action.

Additionally, the holding company unconditionally guarantees that the Bank will comply with the Capital Restoration Plan (“CRP”) until the FDIC notifies the Bank, in writing, that the Bank has been “adequately capitalized”, on average for four consecutive quarters. Additional undertakings by the holding company include:

	●	take any actions directly required of the holding company under the CRP;
	●	take any corporate actions necessary to enable the Bank to take actions required of the Bank under the CRP;
	●	not take any action that would impede the Bank’s ability to implement the CRP; and,
	●	ensure that the Bank is staffed by competent management.

Tamalpais Bank

The Bank was established in 1991 and is subject to primary supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the CDFI and by the FDIC as the Bank’s primary federal regulator. The Bank, now a California chartered commercial bank, has its deposits insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. The Bank operates seven full service branches in Marin County, located north of San Francisco, California. The Bank offers a full range of banking services targeting small-to-medium sized businesses, individuals and high-net worth consumers. The Bank seeks to focus on relationship-based community banking, providing each customer with a number of services, familiarizing itself with, and addressing itself to, customer needs. These customers demand the convenience and personal service that a local, independent financial institution can offer. The Bank attracts deposits, loans and lines of credit from small-to-medium sized businesses, not-for-profit organizations, individuals, merchants, and professionals who live and/or work in the communities comprising the Bank’s market areas.

The Bank’s deposit products include checking products for both business and personal accounts, tiered money market accounts offering a variety of access methods, tax qualified deposits accounts (e.g., IRAs), and certificates of deposit products. The Bank also offers commercial cash management products and DepositNOW Remote Deposit Capture, which is a check clearing tool that allows customers to deposit checks without going to a branch. A courier service is available to the Bank’s professional and business clients. Additionally, the Bank offers its depositors 24-hour access to their accounts by telephone and to both consumer and business accounts through its Internet banking products. The Bank’s ATM network is linked to both the STAR and PLUS networks and is also a member of the MoneyPass® nationwide network whereby customers have access to more than 24,000 surcharge-free ATMs.

The Bank’s lending programs include commercial and retail lending programs including commercial and industrial real estate loans, commercial loans to businesses including SBA loans, mortgages for multifamily real estate, revolving lines of credit and term loans, consumer loans including secured and unsecured lines of credit, land and construction lending for commercial real estate, single family residences and apartment buildings. Because of the regulatory actions as described in this Report, lending activities to borrowers have been curtailed by the Bank. The Bank is currently unable to fund any Commercial Real Estate loans as noted in the Order.

Economic Conditions

In connection with recent turmoil in the California economy and California real estate market, the Bank recorded a net loss of $37,628,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. This loss was primarily attributable to the increases in our loan loss provision for loans sold in the fourth quarter of 2009 and for loans planned to be sold in the first quarter of 2010 subject to regulatory approval, general loan loss provision, as well as non-cash charges of $11,231,000 for the valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets due to significant doubt as to the ability of the Company to realize these deferred tax assets against positive taxable income in future years.

Nonperforming assets totaled $46,946,000 at year end 2009, up from $17,175,000 as of December 31, 2008. Small business owners and investors have seen reduced revenues due to declining economic activity, and rising unemployment has caused some borrowers to become delinquent on loan payments. Additionally, the value of land, construction and commercial real estate loans have been severely impacted by the decline in occupancy rates, rental lease rates and property values. The net loss has had a negative impact on our liquidity and capital adequacy and has resulted in actions by our regulators to restrict our operations as discussed under Regulatory Action above in this Report. See further discussion in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Report. In response to those regulatory actions, we have implemented a remediation plan and are pursing alternative capital and liquidity options.

Tamalpais Wealth Advisors

TWA is a registered investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. TWA provides investment management, financial planning and advice to high-net worth individuals, families and institutions in the Marin County and surrounding marketplace.

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 4, 2010, the Bank entered into an agreement with a San Francisco-based firm whereby the staff of TWA will be absorbed by this firm, and its clients will be referred to the firm and the Company will share revenues from the clients who migrate to the San Francsico-based firm for a period of five years. See Note 25 of this Report on Subsequent Events for TWA.

Market Area

The Company is headquartered in Marin County, California, which has a population of 253,287, the second highest household income in the state and the 5th highest per capita income out of the 3,111 counties nationwide, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. In Marin County, the median price for a single-family home is $755,000, according to DataQuick’s December 2009 home sales report, up $80,000, or 11.9% from the same period a year ago. The per capita income is $91,483, which is the 5th highest in the nation, and household income is $83,910, which is the second highest in the State, according to data from U.S. Census Bureau. Marin County had $9.2 billion in total deposits as of June 30, 2009 and the Bank’s market share of total Marin County deposits increased from 5.14% to 5.27%, an increase of thirteen basis points for the twelve month period from June 2008 to June 2009 according to data from the FDIC (the latest data for which the information is available).

The Company’s market area consists primarily of Marin and San Francisco Counties and to a lesser degree the Greater Bay Area including Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma and Napa counties. The Bank’s deposit gathering efforts are focused primarily in the Marin County communities surrounding its full service branches.

Calendar year 2009 and 2008 were challenging times not only on the national level, but within the state of California, and more specifically, the Company’s primary market area. The ongoing recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2007 has severely impacted the national, state and local housing and commercial markets. The unemployment rate in California has increased dramatically, rising to 12.3% as of December 31, 2009, up from 9.1% as of December 31, 2008. The unemployment rate in Marin County has increased from 5.5% as of December 31, 2008 to 8.0% as of December 31, 2009. Although the Company’s market areas have historically weathered economic downturns better than other areas of the State, the decline in home values, commercial property values and rising unemployment, among other factors, have affected the ability of borrowers to satisfy their financial obligations on a national, state, and local level.

Company Strategy

The Company has adopted a business strategy of developing a business-based banking approach as a means of increasing market share in Marin County. The Company’s strategy of focusing on business owners and individuals residing in the Company’s market area and providing them with financial services and advice to help them grow and prosper incorporates a relationship-based approach to customer service and marketing. The Company has also focused its sales efforts through its Marin County based team of business banking professionals on building the balances of more profitable, noninterest bearing and lower cost transaction accounts from within our market area in order to reduce the cost of funds and dependence on brokered deposits.

Management has embarked upon several ongoing strategic initiatives to strengthen the Company’s financial position, reduce credit and funding risk, and lower the cost of funds. In the first quarter of 2009, the Bank eliminated wholesale commercial and multifamily lending through mortgage brokers, closed the loan production office in Santa Rosa, and eliminated SBA lending outside the Company’s Bay Area footprint. We believe this will allow us to focus solely on in-market customers with whom we can develop a complete banking relationship. It also allows the Company to reduce the level of wholesale funding, as loan portfolio growth will be limited to customers with whom the Bank has a deposit relationship, including low cost transaction and checking accounts. The Company believes this strategy will increase franchise value and strengthen the balance sheet. Additionally, the employees and directors of the Company maintain a high level of involvement and visibility within the community and not-for-profit sector.

The Company also added experience and depth to its credit administration team. In the fourth quarter of 2008, management hired a Chief Credit Officer with extensive in-market commercial lending experience and in the first quarter of 2009 added managers with specific experience in portfolio management and loan administration. In the second quarter of 2009, the Bank promoted Jamie Williams, who has over twenty years of experience working in the Marin County banking industry, to be Executive Vice President/Market President of the Bank. Management also obtains, from time to time, independent third party reviews and managers assistance of the loan portfolio from outside consultants who have bank regulatory or credit experience and are familiar with applicable regulatory guidelines and industry practices. All of these actions enable the Company to continue to be proactive in monitoring credit quality.

In addition, the Company is taking steps to enhance the capital position of the Bank and the Company. In this regard, the Company adopted a plan to reduce certain assets and wholesale liabilities of the Bank, control overhead once the Company has been stabilized, sell certain nonperforming and performing loans and retain earnings. The Board of Directors has suspended paying dividends on its shares of common stock and has deferred payments on the Company’s trust preferred securities to prudently manage its capital position. The Board of Directors is pursuing all alternative strategies, including raising capital, and has engaged a financial advisor.

The Bank is focused on selling performing and nonperforming loans, reducing its reliance on brokered deposits and FHLB funding and on reducing its cost of funds by acquiring small business and consumer deposits through its team of business banking professionals and through its retail branches. As a result of these efforts, the Bank sold $63.5 million in principal of performing and nonperforming loans during fiscal year 2009, FHLB borrowings have decreased $64.0 million, or 35% as of December 31, 2009 while noninterest bearing deposits increased $10.1 million, or 30.4% compared to December 31, 2008. Additionally, because of the regulatory actions as described in this Report, the Company is prohibited from any expansionary activities.

The Company’s strategy incorporates:

	●	tailoring loan and deposit products such as business lines of credit, owner-user commercial real estate, term loans and cash management services to small-to-medium sized businesses;
	●	providing business banking via the team of experienced business bankers focusing on relationship banking including generating business deposits and related loan opportunities;
	●	controlling general and administrative expenses;
	●	increasing core deposits while reducing wholesale funding sources;
	●	increasing capital and related ratios;
	●	focusing on credit quality with C&I, and a relationship oriented commercial lending and a diversified loan portfolio;
	●	increasing non-interest income to a greater portion of total revenue;
	●	utilizing new technologies to better meet the financial needs of businesses and professionals;
	●	aggressively managing-down existing nonperforming loans and OREO’s; and,
	●	proactively managing criticized and substandard performing loans.

The Bank has ongoing programs to evaluate the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses in the current economic conditions. These programs use quantitative analysis to stress test the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio under various default assumptions and incorporate current industry probabilities of default. In addition, the Bank has enhanced its process of evaluating nonperforming loans for impairment. This process involves, among other factors, obtaining updated appraisals, current financial statements, current credit reports, and verifying current net worth and liquidity positions of selected borrowers. The ongoing viability of businesses is also evaluated, including land and construction loans that have been impacted by the downturn in property values.

Based on the continued implementation of these processes and coupled with the increased level of nonperforming assets in fiscal year 2009, loan loss provisions are expected to remain elevated for fiscal year 2010. In addition, as updated appraisals and financial information are received on specific nonperforming assets, specific impairment charges are also likely to be recorded in fiscal year 2010 although the magnitude of these charges cannot be estimated at this time.

Competition

The banking and financial services business in California generally, and in the Company’s market area specifically, is highly competitive with respect to attracting both loan and deposit relationships. The increasingly competitive environment is a result of many factors including, but not limited to:

●

The deepening recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2007 has caused decreased real estate values, increased unemployment, and reductions in the liquidity and net worth of businesses and consumers in the Company’s primary markets.

	●	The ongoing sub-prime and Alt-A lending crisis, which began in the summer of 2007 and continued into 2008, has caused a liquidity shortage, particularly among large retail and commercial mortgage lenders. This has caused increased competition for retail deposits, as these institutions needed to offer above market rates for retail deposits due to their inability to raise liquidity through capital market sources.

	●	Significant consolidation among financial institutions which has occurred over the past several years, resulting in a number of substantially larger competitors with greater resources than the Company.

	●	Increasing integration among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities brokers, and investment banks.

	●	Continued growth and increased market share of non-bank financial service providers that often specialize in a single product line such as credit cards or residential mortgages.

	●	Increased Internet based competition causing the Bank to compete more frequently with remote entities soliciting customers in its primary market area via web based advertising and product delivery.

	●	Introduction of new technologies which may bypass the traditional banking system for funds settlement.

The Company competes for loans, deposits, investments, fee based products, and customers for financial services with commercial banks, savings and loans, credit unions, mortgage bankers, securities and brokerage companies, registered investment advisor firms, insurance firms, finance companies, mutual funds, and other non-bank financial service providers. Many of these competitors are much larger than the Company in total assets, personnel, resources and capitalization and enjoy greater access to capital markets and can offer a broader array of products and services than the Company currently offers.

As of June 30, 2009, approximately 95 banking offices with $9.2 billion in total deposits served the Marin County market. The four banking institutions with the greatest market share, Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America, Bank of Marin and Westamerica Bank, had deposit market shares of 25.1%, 18.9%, 9.4% and 8.1%, respectively, as of June 30, 2009, the most recent date for which data is available, compared with the Bank’s share of 5.3%.

The Company also competes for depositors’ funds with money market mutual funds and with non-bank financial institutions such as brokerage firms, investment management firms and insurance companies. Among the competitive advantages held by certain of these non-bank financial institutions is the ability to finance extensive advertising campaigns, and to allocate investment assets to regions of California or other states with areas of highest demand and often, therefore, highest yield. Large commercial banks also have substantially greater lending limits than the Bank and the ability to offer certain services which are not offered directly by the Bank.

In order to compete with other financial service providers, the Company uses to the fullest extent possible the flexibility and rapid response capabilities which are accorded by its independent status. This includes an emphasis on:

	●	development and sale of specialized products and services tailored to meet its customers’ needs;

	●	local, flexible, and fast decision making;

	●	personal service and the resulting personal relationships of its staff and customers;

	●	referrals from employees, directors and satisfied customers; and,

	●	local community involvement.

Employees

As of December 31, 2009, the Company employed 72 full-time employees. The employees are not represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes that its employee relations are good.

Other Information

There were no significant expenditures made by the Company during the last two fiscal years on material research activities relating to the development of services. The Company’s business is not seasonal. The Company intends to continue its business banking activities that have characterized the Company’s operations over the last year, subject to the restriction placed on the Company due to the Regulatory Orders.

Effect of Governmental Policies and Legislation

The commercial banking business is not only affected by general economic conditions but is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of regulatory agencies, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”). The FRB implements national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing inflation and combating recession) by its open-market operations in United States Government securities which effect short term rates such as the Fed Funds rate, by adjusting the required level of reserves for financial institutions subject to its reserve requirements and by varying the discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions. The actions of the FRB in these areas influence the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and impact on the Bank of any future changes in monetary policies cannot be predicted.

From time to time, legislation is enacted which has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial intermediaries. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial intermediaries are frequently made in Congress, the California legislature and before various banks regulatory and other professional agencies.

Supervision and Regulation

On January 30, 2009, the Bank converted from a California industrial bank to a California chartered commercial bank, and the Company became a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, (“BHCA”).

General

The Bank and holding company operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state regulatory agencies. This regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and not for the benefit of shareholders. Moreover, major new legislation and other regulatory changes affecting the Company, the Bank and the financial services industry in general have occurred in the current and recent years and can be expected to occur in the future. The nature, timing and impact of new and amended laws and regulations cannot be accurately predicted. The following information describes some of the more significant laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the Company and the Bank, and does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all particular statutory or regulatory provisions.

Regulation and Supervision of The Company

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation and examination by the FRB under the BHCA. The Company is required to file with the FRB periodic reports and such additional information as the FRB may require.

The FRB may require the Company to terminate an activity or terminate control of or liquidate or divest certain subsidiaries, affiliates or investments if the FRB believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary. The FRB also has the authority to regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt, including the authority to impose interest ceilings and reserve requirements on such debt. Under certain circumstances, the Company must file written notice and obtain FRB approval prior to purchasing or redeeming its equity securities. Further, the Company is required by the FRB to maintain certain levels of capital.

The Company is required to obtain prior FRB approval for the acquisition of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities or substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior FRB approval is also required for the merger or consolidation of a bank holding company with another bank holding company. Similar state banking agency approvals may also be required. Certain competitive, management, financial and other factors are considered by the bank regulatory agencies in granting these approvals.

With certain exceptions, bank holding companies are prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or furnishing services to subsidiaries. However, subject to prior notice or FRB approval, bank holding companies may engage in, or acquire shares of companies engaged in, those nonbanking activities determined by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.

FRB regulations require that bank holding companies serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to subsidiary banks and commit resources as necessary to support each subsidiary bank. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the FRB to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of FRB regulations or both. The FRB’s bank holding company rating system also emphasizes risk management and evaluation of the potential impact of nondepository entities on safety and soundness.

The Company is also treated as a bank holding company under the California Financial Code. As such, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to periodic examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the CDFI.

Directors, officers and principal shareholders of the Company have had and will continue to have banking transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of business. Any loans and commitments to lend included in such transactions are made in accordance with applicable law, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons of similar creditworthiness, and on terms not involving more than the normal risks of collection or presenting other unfavorable features.

As previously disclosed in this Report, the Company entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco which provides among other things, for the development and implementation of actions to ensure the Bank complies with the Order to Cease and Desist with the FDIC and CDFI, and any other supervisory action taken by the Bank’s federal or state regulators.

	●	take any actions directly required of the holding company under the CRP;
	●	take any corporate actions necessary to enable the Bank to take actions required of the Bank under the CRP;
	●	not take any action that would impede the Bank’s ability to implement the CRP; and,
	●	ensure that the Bank is staffed by competent management.

Securities Registration

The Company’s securities are registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading, corporate governance, and other requirements and restrictions of the Exchange Act.

Regulation and Supervision of The Bank

The Bank is a California state-chartered commercial bank and its deposits are insured by FDIC to the extent provided by law. The Bank is subject to primary supervision, periodic examination and regulation by the CDFI and the FDIC, as the Bank’s primary federal regulator. In general, under the California Financial Code, California banks have all the powers of a California corporation, subject to the general limitation of state bank powers under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) to those permissible for national banks. Specific federal and state laws and regulations which are applicable to banks regulate, among other things, the scope of their business, their investments, their reserves against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds and the nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans. The regulatory structure also gives the bank regulatory agencies extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Furthermore, the Bank is required to maintain certain levels of capital, and is also subject to consumer protection laws.

If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the FDIC or the CDFI should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank or its management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to those regulatory agencies. Such remedies include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of the Bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors and take possession and close and liquidate the Bank.

As previously disclosed in this Report, the Bank entered into an Order to Cease and Desist with the FDIC and CDFI effective September 14, 2009 and the Directive with the FDIC on February 19, 2010. The Order is a formal corrective action pursuant to which the Bank has agreed to address specific areas through the adoption and implementation of procedures, plans and policies designed to enhance the safety and soundness of the Bank. The failure to comply with the terms of the Order or the Directive could result in significant enforcement actions against the Bank of increasing severity, up to and including a regulatory takeover of the Bank.

Regulation of Non-banking Affiliates – TWA

TWA is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser and is subject to various regulations and restrictions imposed by those entities, as well as by various state authorities. Such regulations cover a broad range of subject matters. Rules and regulations for registered investment advisers cover such issues as sales and trading practices; use of client funds and securities; the conduct of directors, officers, and employees; record-keeping and recording; supervisory procedures to prevent improper trading on material non-public information; and qualification and licensing of sales personnel. The SEC’s risk assessment rules also apply to TWA as a registered investment adviser. These rules require a registered investment advisor to maintain and preserve records and maintain risk management policies and procedures. In addition to federal registration, state securities commissions require the registration of certain investment advisors.

Violations of federal, state and FINRA rules or regulations may result in the revocation of investment advisor licenses, imposition of censures or fines, the issuance of cease and desist orders, and the suspension or expulsion of officers and employees from the securities business firm.

Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds

Dividends from the Bank constitute the principal source of funds to the Company. The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. The Company’s ability to pay cash dividends is limited by California law such that shareholders of the Company may receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for such purpose. With certain exceptions, a California corporation may not pay a dividend to its shareholders unless: (i) its retained earnings equal at least the amount of the proposed dividend, or (ii) after giving effect to the dividend, the corporation’s assets would equal at least 1.25 times its liabilities and, for corporations with classified balance sheets, the current assets of the corporation would be at least equal to its current liabilities or, if the average of the earnings of the corporation before taxes on income and before interest expense for the two preceding fiscal years was less than the average of the interest expense of the corporation for those fiscal years, at least equal to 1.25 times its current liabilities.

The FDIC and the CDFI have authority to prohibit the Bank from engaging in activities that, in their opinion, constitute unsafe or unsound practices in conducting its business. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the bank in question and other factors, that the FDIC and CDFI could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments might, under some circumstances, be an unsafe or unsound practice. Furthermore, the FDIC has established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by banks under its jurisdiction. Compliance with the standards set forth in such guidelines and the restrictions that are or may be imposed under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law could limit the amount of dividends which the Bank may pay. An insured depository institution is prohibited from paying management fees to any controlling persons or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions if after such transaction the institution would be undercapitalized. The CDFI may impose similar limitations on the Bank. Under certain circumstances, dividends could be prohibited under the Trust Preferred Securities.

As a result of the Order and Directive as discussed in this Report, the Bank is not permitted to pay any cash dividend, without the prior written approval of FDIC and CDFI. As a result, the Bank currently cannot pay a dividend to the holding company.

Capital Adequacy

The federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based minimum capital guidelines for bank holding companies and banks that are expected to provide a measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and transactions, such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements, which are recorded as off balance sheet items. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar amounts of assets and credit equivalent amounts of off balance sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets with low credit risk, such as certain U.S. Treasury securities, to 100% for assets with relatively high credit risk, such as commercial loans.

The federal banking agencies require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risked-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to average assets, referred to as the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio must be 3%. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios that apply across the industry, the regulators have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above minimum guidelines and ratios.

As a result of the Order and Directive as discussed previously in this Report, our failure to remain “well capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes could result in a regulatory takeover of the Bank.

Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), among other things, identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) and requires the respective federal regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements to be classified as well-capitalized or adequately capitalized. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Failure to meet the capital guidelines could also subject a banking institution to capital raising requirements. An “undercapitalized” institution must develop a capital restoration plan.

An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized, may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or practice warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions. Banking agencies have also adopted regulations which mandate that regulators take into consideration: (i) concentrations of credit risk; (ii) interest rate risk (when the interest rate sensitivity of an institution’s assets does not match the sensitivity of its liabilities or its off-balance-sheet position); and, (iii) risks from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage those risks, when determining the adequacy of an institution’s capital. This evaluation will be made as a part of the institution’s regular safety and soundness examination. In addition, the banking agencies have amended their regulatory capital guidelines to incorporate a measure for market risk. In accordance with the amended guidelines, the Company and any company with significant trading activities must incorporate a measure for market risk in its regulatory capital calculations.

As disclosed previously in this Report, the Bank received a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive from the FDIC on February 19, 2010 due to the Bank’s “significantly undercapitalized” status as of December 31, 2009 under regulatory capital guidelines.

Safety and Soundness Standards

FDICIA imposes certain specific restrictions on transactions and requires federal banking regulators to adopt overall safety and soundness standards for depository institutions related to internal control, loan underwriting and documentation and asset growth. Among other things, FDICIA limits the interest rates paid on deposits by undercapitalized institutions, restricts the use of brokered deposits, limits the aggregate extensions of credit by a depository institution to an executive officer, director, principal shareholder or related interest, and reduces deposit insurance coverage for deposits offered by undercapitalized institutions for deposits by certain employee benefit accounts. The federal banking agencies may require an institution to submit to an acceptable compliance plan as well as have the flexibility to pursue other more appropriate or effective courses of action given the specific circumstances and severity of an institution’s noncompliance with one or more standards.

In December 2006, the FRB and FDIC issued joint guidance relating to institutions’ concentrations in commercial real estate lending. These agencies have observed that commercial real estate concentrations have been rising over the past several years and have reached levels that could create safety and soundness concerns in the event of a significant economic downturn. While these agencies are not establishing a limit on the amount of commercial real estate lending that an institution may conduct, they have established a threshold which examiners may use to identify institutions with potential concentration risk. Any institution that: (1) has experienced rapid growth in commercial real estate lending; (2) has notable exposure to a specific type of commercial real estate; or, (3) is approaching or exceeds the supervisory criteria may be identified for further examination.

Premiums for Deposit Insurance and Assessments for Examinations

The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) administered by the FDIC. FDICIA established several mechanisms to increase funds to protect deposits insured by the DIF. The FDIC is authorized to assess premiums on depository institutions which are members of the DIF, and borrow from the Treasury. Any borrowings not repaid by asset sales are to be repaid through insurance premiums assessed to member institutions. Such premiums must be sufficient to repay any borrowed funds within 15 years and provide insurance fund reserves of $1.25 for each $100 of insured deposits. FDICIA also provides authority for special assessments against insured deposits.

Congress adopted the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and the President signed it on February 8, 2006 and a companion bill, the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005, on February 15, 2006. This legislation provided for:

	●	Merging the DIF and SAIF deposit insurance funds;
	●	Annually adjusting the minimum insurance fund reserve ratio between $1.15 and $1.50 per $100 of insured deposits;
	●	Increasing deposit coverage for retirement accounts to $250,000;
	●	Indexing the insurance level for inflation, with any increases approved by the FDIC and National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) on a five-year cycle beginning in 2010 after review of the state of the deposit insurance fund and related factors;
	●	credits of up to $4.7 billion to offset premiums for banks that capitalized the FDIC by 1996; and,
	●	a historical basis concept for distributing credits and dividends to reflect past contributions to the insurance funds.

The FDIC has designated the DIF long-term target reserve ratio at 1.25% of insured deposits. Due to recent bank failures, the FDIC insurance fund reserve ratio has fallen below 1.15%, the statutory minimum. Effective January 1, 2009, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan that uniformly increased insurance assessments. The FDIC adopted changes to the deposit insurance assessment system beginning with the second quarter of 2009 to make the increase in assessments fairer by requiring riskier institutions to pay a larger share. Institutions would be classified into one of four risk categories. Within each category, the FDIC will be able to assess higher rates to institutions with a significant reliance on secured liabilities, which generally raises the FDIC’s loss in the event of failure without providing additional assessment revenue. The proposal also would assess higher rates for institutions with a significant reliance on brokered deposits but, for well-managed and well-capitalized institutions, only when accompanied by rapid asset growth. The proposal also would provide incentives in the form of a reduction in assessment rates for institutions to hold long-term unsecured debt and, for smaller institutions, high levels of Tier 1 capital. Together, the changes improved the way the system differentiates risk among insured institutions.

Under the EESA, adopted on October 3, 2008, certain increases in FDIC deposit insurance have also been approved, as amended. From October 3, 2009, until December 31, 2013, the amount of deposit insurance provided by the FDIC is increased from $100,000 to $250,000. This temporary increase is automatic. In November 2008, the FDIC adopted the Transaction Account Guaranty Program (“TAGP”) that provides, in exchange for additional assessments, unlimited deposit insurance on funds in noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, certain attorney trust accounts, and NOW accounts paying no more than 50 basis points of interest regardless of dollar amount. Given the current deficient funded condition of the DIF and expected continued bank failures, the Bank expects premiums for deposit insurance to remain elevated. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment of 5 basis points of each institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, not to exceed 10 basis points times its assessment base for the quarter. In November 2009, the FDIC adopted a rule requiring prepayment of assessments for 2010, 2011 and 2012. This rule allows the FDIC, however, to exercise its discretion under certain circumstances to exempt an institution that is under a Cease and Desist Order to be exempt from the prepaid requirement, and thus the Bank was exempt from prepaying these assessments in 2009.

Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations

The bank regulatory agencies are focusing greater attention on compliance with consumer protection laws and their implementing regulations. Examination and enforcement have become more intense in nature, and insured institutions have been advised to monitor carefully compliance with various consumer protection laws and their implementing regulations. The Bank is subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and regulations, including Community Reinvestment Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Fair Housing Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Penalties under these statutes may include fines, reimbursements and other penalties. Due to heightened regulatory concern related to compliance with these and other statutes generally, the Bank may incur additional compliance costs.

The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and Fair Lending Developments

The Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements and reporting obligations involving lending, investing and other CRA activities. CRA requires the Bank to identify the communities served by the Bank’s offices and to identify the types of credit and investments the Bank is prepared to extend within such communities including low and moderate income neighborhoods. It also requires the Bank’s regulators to assess the Bank’s performance in meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such assessment into consideration in reviewing application for mergers, acquisitions, relocation of existing branches, opening of new branches and other transactions. A bank may be subject to substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws. The federal banking agencies may take compliance with such laws and CRA in consideration when regulating and supervising other banking activities.

A bank’s compliance with its CRA obligations is determined based on a performance-based evaluation system which bases CRA ratings on an institution’s lending, service and investment performance. An unsatisfactory rating may be the basis for denying a merger application. The Bank’s latest CRA examination was completed by the FDIC and received an overall rating of outstanding in complying with its CRA obligations.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (“GLB Act”)

In November 1999, the GLB Act was enacted. The GLB Act repeals provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act which restricted the affiliation of Federal Reserve member banks with firms “engaged principally” in specified securities activities, and which restricted officer, director or employee interlocks between a member bank and any company or person “primarily engaged” in specified securities activities. In addition, the GLB Act contains provisions that expressly preempt any state law restricting the establishment of financial affiliations, primarily related to insurance. The general effect of the law is to establish a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the BHCA framework to permit a holding company to engage in a full range of financial activities through a new entity known as a “financial holding company.” “Financial activities” is broadly defined to include not only banking, insurance and securities activities, but also merchant banking and additional activities that the FRB, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines to be financial in nature, incidental to such financial activities or complementary activities that do not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally.

The GLB Act provides that no company may acquire control of an insured savings association unless that company engages, and continues to engage, only in the financial activities permissible for a financial holding company, unless the company is grandfathered as a unitary savings and loan holding company. The GLB Act grandfathers any company that was a unitary savings and loan holding company on May 4, 1999 or became a unitary savings and loan holding company pursuant to an application pending on that date. The GLB Act also permits national banks to engage in expanded activities through the formation of financial subsidiaries. A national bank may have a subsidiary engaged in any activity authorized for national banks directly or any financial activity, except for insurance underwriting, insurance investments, real estate investment or development, or merchant banking, which may only be conducted through a subsidiary of a financial holding company. Financial activities include all activities permitted under new sections of the BHCA or permitted by regulation.

To the extent that the GLB Act permits banks, securities firms and insurance companies to affiliate, the financial services industry may experience further consolidation. The GLB Act is intended to grant to community banks powers as a matter of right that larger institutions have accumulated on an ad hoc basis and which unitary savings and loan holding companies already possess. Nevertheless, the GLB Act may have the result of increasing the amount of competition that the Company faces from larger institutions and other types of companies offering financial products, many of which may have substantially more financial resources than the Company has.

Customer Information Security

The federal bank regulatory agencies have established standards for safeguarding nonpublic personal information about customers that implement provisions of the GLB Act (the “Guidelines”). Among other things, the Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information, and to protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.

Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”)

The BSA is a tool that the U.S. government uses to fight drug trafficking, money laundering and other crimes. Under the BSA, financial institutions are required to file certain reports, including suspicious activities reports and currency transaction reports, with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network under certain circumstances. Financial institutions are also required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the BSA. If a financial institution fails to timely file a report or fails to implement its BSA policies and procedures, it could subject the institution to enforcement action or civil money penalties. In July 2007, federal banking regulators issued the Intercompany Statement on Enforcement of Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Requirements to provide greater consistency among the agencies in enforcement decisions in BSA matters and to offer insight into the considerations that form the basis of such BSA enforcement decisions.

On October 26, 2001, the President signed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act also made significant changes to BSA. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and of identifying customers when establishing new relationships and standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. For example, the enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls generally require financial institutions to take reasonable steps:

	●	to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transaction;

	●	to ascertain the identity of the nominal and beneficial owners of, and the source of funds deposited into, each account as needed to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transactions;

	●	to ascertain for any foreign bank, the shares of which are not publicly traded, the identity of the owners of the foreign bank, and the nature and extent of the ownership interest of each such owner; and,

	●	to ascertain whether any foreign bank provides correspondent accounts to other foreign banks and, if so, the identity of those foreign banks and related due diligence information.

Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are to establish anti-money laundering programs to enhance their BSA. The USA PATRIOT Act sets forth minimum standards for these programs, including the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls, designation of a compliance officer, ongoing employee training program, and independent audit function to test the programs. Management believes that the Bank is currently in compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), was signed into law to address corporate and accounting fraud. SOX establishes a new accounting oversight board that will enforce auditing standards and restricts the scope of services that accounting firms may provide to their public company audit clients. Among other things, SOX also: (i) requires chief executive officers and chief financial officers to certify to the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC; (ii) imposes new disclosure requirements regarding internal controls, off-balance-sheet transactions, and pro forma (non-GAAP) disclosures; (iii) accelerates the time frame for reporting of insider transactions and periodic disclosures by public companies; and, (iv) requires companies to disclose whether or not they have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers and whether the audit committee includes at least one “audit committee financial expert.”

Under SOX, the SEC is required to regularly and systematically review corporate filings, based on certain enumerated factors. To deter wrongdoing, SOX: (i) subjects bonuses issued to top executives to disgorgement if a restatement of a company’s financial statements was due to corporate misconduct; (ii) prohibits an officer or director from misleading or coercing an auditor; (iii) prohibits insider trades during pension fund “blackout periods”; (iv) imposes new criminal penalties for fraud and other wrongful acts; and, (v) extends the period during which certain securities fraud lawsuits can be brought against a company or its officers. As a public reporting company, the Company was required to provide management’s report on internal control over financial reporting beginning with its 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The auditor’s attestation report on internal controls over financial reporting is not required until 2010 unless there is a deferment announced during 2010. The Company has adopted a code of ethics (“Code of Ethics”) that applies to its executive officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics is filed as an exhibit hereto.

California Financial Information Privacy Act/Fair Credit Reporting Act

In 1970, the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”) was enacted to insure the confidentiality, accuracy, relevancy and proper utilization of consumer credit report information. Under the framework of the FCRA, the United States has developed a highly advanced and efficient credit reporting system. The information contained in that broad system is used by financial institutions, retailers and other creditors of every size in making a wide variety of decisions regarding financial transactions. Employers and law enforcement agencies have also made wide use of the information collected and maintained in databases made possible by the FCRA. The FCRA affirmatively preempts state law in a number of areas, including the ability of entities affiliated by common ownership to share and exchange information freely, and the requirements on credit bureaus to reinvestigate the contents of reports in response to consumer complaints, among others.

Congress enacted the FACT Act, (“Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act”) of 2003, which has the effect of avoiding the sunset preemption provision of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) that were due to expire on December 31, 2003. The President signed the FACT Act into law on December 4, 2003. In general, the FACT Act amends the FCRA and, in addition, provides that, when the implementing regulations have been issued and become effective, the FACT Act preempts elements of the California Financial Information Privacy Act. A series of regulations and announcements were promulgated during 2004, including a joint FTC/Federal Reserve announcement of effective dates for FCRA amendments, the FTC’s “Free Credit Report” rule, revisions to the FTC’s FACT Act Rules, the FTC’s final rules on identity theft and proof of identity, the FTC’s final regulation on consumer information and records disposal, and the FTC’s final summaries and notices. Regulations implementing this provision of FACT Act have a mandatory effective date of October 1, 2008. The Bank has developed and implemented a written program to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft for certain new and existing accounts.

Regulation W

Transactions between a bank and its “affiliates” are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act applies Sections 23A and 23B to insured nonmember banks in the same manner and to the same extent as if they were members of the Federal Reserve System. The FRB also issued Regulation W, which became effective on April 1, 2003, which codifies prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and provides interpretative guidance with respect to affiliate transactions. Affiliates of a bank include, among other entities, the bank’s parent company and companies that are under common control with the bank. The Company is considered to be an affiliate of the Bank. In general, subject to certain specified exemptions, a bank or its subsidiaries are limited in their abilities to engage in “covered transactions” with affiliates:

	●	to an amount equal to 10% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with any one affiliate; and,

	●	to an amount equal to 20% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with all affiliates.

A “covered transaction” includes, among other things, a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate; a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate; a purchase of assets from an affiliate, with some exceptions; and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. In addition, a bank and its subsidiaries may engage in certain transactions only on terms and under circumstances that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank or its subsidiary, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. The Bank is in compliance with Regulation W.

Programs to Mitigate Identity Theft

In November 2007, federal banking agencies together with the NCUA and FTC adopted regulations under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 to require financial institutions and other creditors to develop and implement a written identity theft prevention program to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft in connection with certain new and existing accounts. Covered accounts generally include consumer accounts and other accounts that present a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft. Each institution’s program must include policies and procedures designed to: (i) identify indicators, or “red flags,” of possible risk of identity theft based; (ii) detect the occurrence of red flags; (iii) respond appropriately to red flags that are detected; and, (iv) ensure that the program is updated periodically as appropriate to address changing circumstances. The regulations include guidelines that each institution must consider and, to the extent appropriate, include in its program.

Pending Legislation

Changes to state laws and regulations (including changes in interpretation or enforcement) can affect the operating environment of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. From time to time, various legislative and regulatory proposals are introduced. These proposals, if codified, may change banking statutes and regulations and the Company’s operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. If codified, these proposals could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions. The Company cannot accurately predict whether those changes in laws and regulations will occur, and, if those changes occur, the ultimate effect they would have upon our financial condition or results of operations. It is likely, however, that the current level of enforcement and compliance-related activities of federal and state authorities will continue and potentially increase.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

Readers and prospective investors in our securities should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other information contained in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. Any of the following risks could adversely affect our financial performance and condition.

We have consented to the issuance of a cease and desist order by our regulators and failure to comply with the terms of this order could result in significant enforcement actions.

We and our subsidiaries are regulated by several regulators, including the Federal Reserve, SEC, FDIC and California DFI. Our success is affected by state and federal regulations affecting banks and bank holding companies, and the securities markets. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. The financial services industry also is subject to frequent legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes, the effects of which cannot be predicted. Federal bank regulatory agencies and the Treasury, as well as the Congress and the President, are evaluating the regulation of banks, other financial services providers and the financial markets and such changes, if any, could require us to maintain more capital, liquidity and risk management which could adversely affect our growth, profitability and financial condition.

On September 14, 2009 the FDIC and the California DFI issued the Order to the Bank. Among other things, the Order mandates that the Bank cease and desist from certain unsafe and unsound banking practices, including operating with: management whose policies and practices are detrimental to the Bank and jeopardize the safety of its deposits; inadequate board oversight; inadequate capital in relation to the kind and quality of assets held by the Bank; an inadequate loan valuation reserve; a large volume of poor quality loans; engaging in unsatisfactory lending and collection practices; and inadequate provisions for liquidity. Specifically, the Order required that the Bank submit to the regulators a detailed capital plan to address how the Bank would achieve and thereafter maintain its Tier I capital ratio above 9% and total risk-based capital ratio above 12% by December 31, 2009; the Bank did not meet these increased capital requirements by that date. The failure to comply with the terms of the Order could result in significant enforcement actions against the Bank of increasing severity, up to and including a regulatory takeover of the Bank.

Effective January 14, 2010, as a result of the Order, the Company entered into an FRB Agreement. The FRB Agreement generally provides, among other things, for the development and implementation of actions to ensure the Bank complies with the Order, and any other supervisory action taken by the Bank’s federal or state regulators. The FRB Agreement specifies certain timeframes for meeting the requirements of the FRB Agreement. Specifically, the Order required that the Bank submit to the regulators a detailed capital plan to address how the Bank would achieve and thereafter maintain its Tier 1 capital ratio above 9% and total risk-based capital ratio above 12% by December 31, 2009; the Bank did not meet those increased capital requirements by that date. The failure to comply with the terms of the FRB Agreement could result in significant enforcement actions against the Company.

The Bank’s regulatory capital position has fallen below the level necessary to be considered “well capitalized” and was categorized as “significantly undercapitalized” as of December 31, 2009. “Significantly undercapitalized” banks may not accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits or solicit deposits yielding more than 75 basis points over prevailing rates in either the Bank’s market area or the area where deposits are solicited. The Bank’s “significantly undercapitalized” status subjects it to additional regulatory restrictions that are generally consistent with the restrictions identified within the Order and include, among others, that the Bank generally may not make any capital distributions, must submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to the FDIC, may not increase its average total assets during a calendar quarter in excess of its average total assets during the preceding calendar quarter and may not establish or acquire a new branch office or sell, relocate or dispose of an existing branch without regulatory approval.

We have consented to the issuance of a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive by our regulators.

On February 19, 2010, the FDIC issued a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive (the “Directive) to the Bank due to the Bank’s “significantly undercapitalized” status as of December 31, 2009 under regulatory capital guidelines. The Directive provides that within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. The failure to comply with the terms of the Directive could result in a regulatory takeover of the Bank.

Difficult economic and market conditions have adversely affected our industry.

Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions. General downward economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. Financial institutions have experienced decreased access to deposits and borrowings. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. We do not expect that the difficult conditions in the financial markets are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial institutions industry. In particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:

●

Increased regulation of our industry. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.

	●	The process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. The level of uncertainty concerning economic conditions may adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the process.

	●	Significantly higher FDIC premiums because market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits.

If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the U.S. banking system. On October 3, 2008, President Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, in response to the current crisis in the financial sector. The U.S. Treasury and banking regulators have implemented a number of programs under this legislation to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system. On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. There can be no assurance, however, as to the actual impact that the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act or the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act or other legislative and executive initiatives will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced. The failure of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act or American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to help stabilize the financial markets and a continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the value of our securities.

U.S. financial markets and economic conditions could adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

Recent turmoil and downward economic trends have been particularly acute in the financial sector. The cost and availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and the demand for our products and services may decline as our borrowers and customers realize the impact of an economic slowdown and recession. In view of the concentration of our operations and the collateral securing our loan portfolio in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, we may be particularly susceptible to the adverse economic conditions in the state of California where our business is concentrated. In addition, the severity and duration of these adverse conditions is unknown and may exacerbate our exposure to credit risk and adversely affect the ability of borrowers to perform under the terms of their lending arrangements with us.

Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our nonperforming loans (which consist of non-accrual loans) totaled $43.4 million and $16.8 million, or 8.4% and 2.9% of the gross loans, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our nonperforming assets (which include foreclosed real estate) were $46.9 million and $17.2 million, or 7.5% and 2.4% of total assets, respectively. In addition, we had approximately $11.5 million and $12.8 million in accruing loans that were 30-89 days delinquent at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. Until economic and market conditions improve, we expect to continue to incur additional losses relating to an increase in nonperforming loans. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or other real estate owned, thereby adversely affecting our income, and increasing our loan administration costs. When we take collateral in foreclosures and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the related loan to the then fair market value of the collateral, which may result in a loss. These loans and other real estate owned also increase our risk profile and the capital our regulators believe is appropriate in light of such risks. Decreases in the value of these assets, or the underlying collateral, or in these borrowers’ performance or financial conditions, whether or not due to economic and market conditions beyond our control, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and our directors, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. There can be no assurance that we will not experience further increases in nonperforming assets in the future.

Our allowance for loan losses may prove inadequate or we may be adversely affected by credit risk exposures.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a $50.8 million provision for loan losses and charged off $35.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a $3.2 million provision for loan losses and charged off $37,000. Our business depends on the creditworthiness of our customers. We periodically review our allowance for loan losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality indicators, including past charge-off experience and levels of past due loans and nonperforming assets. We cannot be certain that our allowance for loan losses will be adequate over time to cover credit losses in our portfolio because of unanticipated adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events adversely affecting specific customers, industries or markets, or borrower behaviors towards repaying their loans. The credit quality of our borrowers has deteriorated as a result of the economic downturn in our markets, particularly in California. Continuing deterioration in the real estate market could affect the ability of our loan customers, including our largest borrowing relationships, to service their debt, which could result in additional loan charge offs and provisions for loan losses in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, net income and capital. As part of the Order, the Bank has agreed to review, at least quarterly, and revise as necessary its allowance for loan losses.

During 2009, our commercial and residential real estate portfolios have continued to be affected by adverse market conditions, including reduced real estate prices and sales levels and, more generally, the entirety of our loan portfolio has been affected by the sustained economic weakness of our markets and the impact of higher unemployment rates.

Our commercial and residential real estate loans have continued to be affected adversely by the on-going deterioration in real estate prices and reduced levels of sales. More generally, all of our commercial real estate loan portfolio, especially construction, hospitality and development loans, have been affected adversely by the economic weakness of our California markets and the effects of higher unemployment rates. We may have to increase our allowance for loan losses through additional provisions for loan losses because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions, and events that adversely affect our customers or markets. Our business, financial condition, liquidity, capital, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by additional provisions for loan losses.

We are a holding company and depend on Tamalpais Bank for dividends, distributions and other payments, which are currently restricted from being paid.

We are a company separate and apart from Tamalpais Bank that must provide for our own liquidity. Substantially all of our revenues are obtained from dividends declared and paid by the Bank for which prior approval from the FDIC and California DFI and additional action by our board of directors will be necessary. As a result of the Order and the Directive, the Bank is not permitted to pay any cash dividend at this time, without the prior written approval of these regulators. As a result, the Bank cannot pay a dividend to us. Although the Bank can seek to obtain approval to pay such a dividend, the FDIC and the California DFI may choose not to provide such approval and we would not expect to be released from this prohibition until our financial performance improves significantly. Therefore, the Bank may not be able to resume payments of dividends to us in the future.

We may be subjected to negative publicity that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

We may be the subject of negative news reports discussing our current financial situation and various departures of senior management as the press and others speculate about whether we will be able to continue as a going concern. These reports may have a negative impact on our business. For example, even though our deposits are insured by the FDIC, customers may choose to withdraw their deposits, and new customers may choose to do business elsewhere. In addition, we may find that our service providers will be reluctant to commit to long-term projects with us. Even if we are able to improve our current financial situation, we may be the object of negative publicity and speculation about our future.

We are subject to restrictions on the amount of interest that we can pay our customers, which could cause our deposits to decrease. Because we depend on deposits as a source of liquidity, a decrease in deposits would adversely affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

We are currently in default on our outstanding commitments to two of our lenders.

On September 3, 2009, we were notified by Pacific Coast Bankers Bank, or PCBB, that we are in default under the terms of our business loan agreements with PCBB. As a result of this default, PCBB has the option, to, among other things, declare the $5.7 million principal amount outstanding under the loan agreements immediately due and payable or foreclose on the collateral securing the loans, which includes the stock of the Bank. If PCBB were to declare a default under these loan agreements and proceed to exercise their available remedies, our business and financial conditions will be materially adversely affected.

Additionally, we are in technical default under the terms of the advances and security agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, or FHLBSF. When the holding company was unable to make its payment obligations to PCBB in the fourth quarter 2009, a cross-default provision in the agreement with the FHLBSF was triggered. As a result of this default, FHLBSF has the option to, among other things, declare the $119.1 million principal amount of advances outstanding under the advances and security agreement immediately due and payable or foreclose on the securities and loans pledged as collateral securing the advances. If FHLBSF were to declare a default under this agreement and proceed to exercise their available remedies, our business and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

We are not currently paying dividends on our common stock and are deferring distributions on our trust preferred securities, which restricts our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

We historically paid cash dividends before we suspended dividend payments on our common stock and distributions on our trust preferred securities. Future payment of cash dividends on our common stock, if any, will be subject to the prior payment of all deferred distributions on our trust preferred securities. All dividends are declared and paid at the discretion of our board of directors and are dependent upon our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. Further, distributions on our trust preferred securities are cumulative and therefore unpaid dividends and distributions will accrue and compound on each subsequent dividend payment date.

Our concentration of commercial real estate loans could result in increased loan losses.

At December 31, 2009, approximately 75.5% of our loan portfolio was concentrated in commercial real estate, or CRE, which has experienced significant deterioration as a result of economic conditions and their effect on our borrowers. The banking regulators continue to give CRE lending greater scrutiny, and banks with higher levels of CRE loans are expected to implement improved underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as higher levels of allowances for possible losses and capital levels as a result of CRE lending growth and exposures. For the fiscal year 2009, we added $50.8 million of provisions for loan losses compared to $3.2 million in the fiscal year 2008, $244,000 in 2007 and $439,000 in 2006, in part reflecting collateral evaluations in response to recent changes in the market values of multifamily and commercial real estate and land collateralizing acquisition and development loans.

Further deterioration in the hospitality industry may adversely affect our results of operations.

As of December 31, 2009, approximately 15.5% of our loan portfolio was comprised of hospitality loans. Our hospitality loans are made to borrowers within the San Francisco Greater Bay Area and other regions of Northern California. We have identified hospitality loans as a higher risk concentration based on the impact of the economic conditions on the hospitality industry and supported by the rise in delinquencies and requests for payment deferments. Further deterioration in the credit quality of the hospitality loan portfolio could result in additional loan charge-offs and provisions for loan losses in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, net income and capital.

Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.

FDIC insurance premiums have increased substantially in 2009 already and we expect to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums in the future. Market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. The FDIC adopted a revised risk-based deposit insurance assessment schedule on February 27, 2009, which raised deposit insurance premiums. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC also implemented a five basis point special assessment of each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of September 30, 2009, but no more than 10 basis points times the institution’s assessment base for the second quarter of 2009, to be collected on September 30, 2009. Additional special assessments may be imposed by the FDIC for future periods. We participate in the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, or TLG, for noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts. Banks that participate in the TLG’s noninterest-bearing transaction account guarantee will pay the FDIC an annual assessment of 10 basis points on the amounts in such accounts above the amounts covered by FDIC deposit insurance. To the extent that these TLG assessments are insufficient to cover any loss or expenses arising from the TLG program, the FDIC is authorized to impose an emergency special assessment on all FDIC-insured depository institutions. The FDIC has authority to impose charges for the TLG program upon depository institution holding companies, as well. These changes will cause the premiums and TLG assessments charged by the FDIC to increase. In addition, in November 2009, the FDIC enacted regulation to require banks to prepay three years of premiums by the end of 2009. Since the Bank is under a Cease and Desist order, the prepayment of the premiums is not applicable to the Bank. However, these actions could significantly increase our noninterest expense in 2010 and for the foreseeable future.

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than a year. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial condition or performance. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, we may experience adverse effects, which may be material, on our ability to maintain or access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity risks could affect operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities or on terms which are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Pursuant to terms of the Directive, the FDIC must approve material transactions, which could affect our ability to sell loans to increase liquidity. Our liquidity, on a parent only basis, is adversely affected by the inability of receiving dividends from the Bank, based on its current capital position. If our holding company is unable to receive dividends from the Bank, it may be unable to service its own obligations, which would adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as further disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

We are required to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, and if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses, an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as our regulatory requirements, would be adversely affected.

Both we and the Bank must meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. The Order requires, among other things, that the Bank submit a capital plan that will ensure that it achieves and maintains a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 9% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%. We have not met these increased capital requirements. Our ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry and market condition, and governmental activities, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to meet these capital and other regulatory requirements, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures. We have historically utilized deposits obtained out of our market area. As of December 31, 2009, we had wholesale deposits through deposit brokers of $92.0 million (18.9% of deposits) and through non-brokered wholesale sources of $121.7 million (25.0% of deposits). These deposits, some of which were certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, were obtained for generally longer terms than can be acquired through retail sources as a means to control interest rate risk or were acquired to fund all short term differences between loan and deposit growth rates. However, based on the amount of wholesale funds maturing in each month, we may not be able to replace all wholesale deposits with retail deposits upon maturity. As a result of the Order, the Bank is no longer permitted to accept new or renew maturing brokered deposits unless it receives the prior approval of the FDIC and the California DFI. Our financial flexibility could be severely constrained if we are unable to renew our wholesale funding or if adequate financing is not available in the future at acceptable rates of interest. We may not have sufficient liquidity to continue to fund new loan originations, and we may need to liquidate loans or other assets unexpectedly in order to repay obligations as they mature.

Our profitability and liquidity may be affected by changes in interest rates and economic conditions.

Our profitability depends upon net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Net interest income will be adversely affected if market interest rates change such that the interest we pay on deposits and borrowings and our FDIC deposit insurance assessments increase faster than the interest earned on loans and investments. Interest rates, and consequently our results of operations, are affected by general economic conditions and fiscal and monetary policies may materially affect the level and direction of interest rates. From September 2004 to mid-2006, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate from 1.0% to 5.25%. Since then, beginning in September 2007, the Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rates by 100 basis points to 4.25% over the remainder of 2007, and has since reduced the target federal funds rate by an additional 400 basis points to a range between zero to 25 basis points beginning in December 2008. Decreases in interest rates generally increase the market values of fixed-rate, interest-bearing investments and loans held, and increase the values of loan sales and mortgage loan activities. However, the production of mortgages and other loans and the value of collateral securing our loans, are dependent on demand within the markets we serve, as well as interest rates. The levels of sales, as well as the values of real estate in our markets, have declined. Declining rates reflect efforts by the Federal Reserve to stimulate the economy, but may not be effective, and thus may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition, liquidity and earnings.

Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in highly competitive markets.

We operate in the highly competitive markets of Marin County and the Greater Bay Area including San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma and Napa counties of California. Our future growth and success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in these markets. We compete for loans, deposits and other financial services in geographic markets with other local, regional and national commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions and mortgage lenders. Many of our competitors offer products and services different from us, and have substantially greater resources, name recognition and market presence than we do, which benefits them in attracting business. Larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we can, and have broader customer and geographic bases to draw upon.

We may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain key people and there are a limited number of qualified persons with knowledge of and experience in the banking industry in our market. Furthermore, recent demand for skilled finance and accounting personnel among publicly traded companies has increased the importance of attracting and retaining these people. Competition for the best people can be intense and we may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

Our ability to engage in routine funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems, losses of depositor, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. We could experience increases in deposits and assets as a result of other banks’ difficulties or failure, which would increase the capital we need to support such growth.

We are subject to internal control reporting requirements that increase compliance costs and failure to comply timely could adversely affect our reputation and the value of our securities.

We are required to comply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and NASDAQ. In particular, we are required to include management and, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, independent auditor attestation reports on internal controls as part of our annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Our failure to track and comply with the various rules may materially adversely affect our reputation, ability to obtain the necessary certifications to financial statements, and the value of our securities.

Technological changes affect our business, and we may have fewer resources than many competitors to invest in technological improvements.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to serving clients better, the effective use of technology may increase efficiency and may enable financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to use technology to provide products and services that provide convenience to customers and to create additional efficiencies in operations. We may need to make significant additional capital investments in technology in the future, and we may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services. Many competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements.

We may raise additional capital, which could have a dilutive effect on the existing holders of our common stock and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In order to comply with the Order and Directive, we may increase our capital resources by issuing additional common stock or preferred stock. Some of these issues, were they to occur, could substantially dilute the value of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in future public or private transactions may be influenced by market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of our future offerings. In addition, market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of securities in the future.

In addition, we face significant regulatory and other governmental risk as a financial institution, and it is possible that capital requirements and directives could in the future require us to change the amount or composition of our current capital, including common equity. In this regard, we note that we were not one of the 19 institutions required to conduct a forward-looking capital assessment, or “stress test,” in conjunction with the Federal Reserve and other federal bank supervisors, pursuant to the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, a complement to the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Assistance Program, which makes capital available to financial institutions as a bridge to private capital in the future. However, the stress assessment requirements under the Capital Assistance Program or similar requirement could be extended or otherwise impact financial institutions beyond the 19 participating institutions, including us. As a result, our regulators have required us to raise additional capital. There could also be market perceptions regarding the need to raise additional capital, whether as a result of public disclosures that were made regarding the Capital Assistance Program stress test methodology or otherwise, and, regardless of the outcome of the stress tests or other stress case analysis, such perceptions could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Our independent registered public accountants have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In their audit report for the year ended December 31, 2009, our independent registered public accountants have stated that certain matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have been significantly and negatively impacted by the events and conditions impacting the banking industry. We and the industry have been adversely affected by rising unemployment, declining real estate and financial asset prices, and rising delinquency and loss rates on loans. These in turn have caused significant losses, reduced our capital materially, and had other follow-on consequences. There is the potential for these events to impact our on-going access to liquidity sources. In addition, some of our on-going operations, particularly our ability to continue to access our traditional funding sources, are impacted by our regulatory capital ratios and regulatory standing. Should management be unable to execute on its plans, including restoring and maintaining its capital ratios at amounts that would result in its ratios being sufficient to be declared “well capitalized,” there could be a doubt on our ability to remain a going concern. Our audited financial statements were prepared under the assumption that we will continue our operations on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our shareholders will lose some or all of their investment in the Company.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth information relating to each of the Company’s offices as of December 31, 2009:

	Leased	Original Date	Date of
	Or	Leased or	Lease	Square
	Owned	Acquired	Expiration	Footage
Administrative Offices:
630 Las Gallinas Ave.	Leased	6/1/2005	12/16/2013	9,453
San Rafael, California 94903

Full Service Branch Offices Currently Open:
851 Irwin St., Suite 100	Leased	8/18/1998	6/30/2010	3,417
San Rafael, California 94901

453-455 Miller Ave.	Leased	5/1/2002	4/31/2012	3,026
Mill Valley, California 94941

575 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.	Leased	7/23/2002	7/31/2012	2,600
Greenbrae, California 94904

100 Sir Francis Drake Blvd.	Leased	11/15/2002	11/15/2017	2,184
San Anselmo, California 94960

630 Las Gallinas Ave., Suite 100	Leased	6/1/2005	6/1/2013	2,500
San Rafael, California 94903

71 Casa Buena Drive	Leased	12/29/2003	12/29/2013	3,746
Corte Madera, California 94925

1652 Tiburon Boulevard	Leased	8/15/2005	7/30/2015	2,230
Tiburon, California 94920

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of business. Management is of the opinion, based on its review with counsel of the development of such matters to date, that the ultimate disposition of such matters will not materially affect the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On November 25, 2009, the Company received the written consent from shareholders holding a majority of its outstanding common stock to the proposed amendment (the “Share Amendment”) to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized shares of common stock. As of November 25, 2009, 2,082,824 shares of common stock (54.47% of the 3,823,634 shares entitled to vote) voted to consent to the Share Amendment, 1,027,771 shares (26.88% of shares entitled to vote) voted to withhold consent, and 6,312 shares (0.17% shares entitled to vote) abstained.

On November 25, 2009, the Company received the written consent from shareholders holding a majority of its outstanding common stock to permit (but not require) the board of directors of the Company to amend its Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the Company’s Common Stock at any time prior to November 4, 2010, by a ratio of not less than one-for-two and not more than one-for-ten with the exact ratio to be set at a whole number within this range as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion. As of November 25, 2009, 2,738,062 shares of common stock (71.61% of the 3,823,634 shares entitled to vote) voted to consent to the Reverse Stock Split, 372,533 shares (9.74% of shares entitled to vote) voted to withhold consent, and 6,312 shares (0.17% shares entitled to vote) abstained.

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUERS PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol TAMB.

At February 27, 2010, 3,823,634 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value were outstanding. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low trade prices per share of the Company’s common stock.

		Sales Price of
		Common Stock
		High		Low
2009
	First Quarter	$	9.00	$	5.02
	Second Quarter		6.41		4.50
	Third Quarter		4.90		1.30
	Fourth Quarter		2.13		0.57

2008
	First Quarter	$	13.00	$	9.80
	Second Quarter		12.85		10.99
	Third Quarter		12.90		9.40
	Fourth Quarter		12.25		8.40

The Company’s closing price on December 31, 2009 was $0.84 per share, compared to the closing price one year earlier of $8.47 per share.

On March 12, 2010, we received a letter from the NASDAQ Stock Market notifying us that our shares of Common Stock no longer meet NASDAQ’s continued listing requirement under Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), or the Bid Price Rule, because the bid price for the Common Stock has closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. Pursuant to Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 days, until September 8, 2010, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule. If, prior to September 8, 2010, the bid price of the Common Stock closes at $1.00 per share, or higher, for at least 10 consecutive business days, NASDAQ will notify us that the matter will be closed.

If compliance with the Bid Price Rule cannot be established prior to September 8, 2010, our Common Stock will be subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Capital Market. We may, however, be eligible for an additional 180-day grace period if we satisfy the initial listing standards (with the exception of the Bid Price Rule) for listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market. We are evaluating our options following receipt of the notification and intend to take appropriate actions in order to retain the listing of our Common Stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Dividends

The Company initiated a cash dividend program in 2004. The Board of Directors evaluates the payment of dividends on a quarterly basis. The shareholders of the Company will be entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by its Board of Directors, out of funds legally available, subject to the dividend preference, if any, on preferred shares that may be outstanding and also subject to the restrictions of the California General Corporation Law. There are no preferred shares outstanding at this time. There is no assurance, however, that any dividends will be paid since they are dependent upon earnings, cash balances, financial condition, asset quality, and capital requirements of the Company and its subsidiaries as well as general economic conditions. See “Supervision and Regulation – Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds.” See also Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2007, the Board of Directors declared a 7% stock dividend payable on February 14, 2007 to shareholders of record on January 31, 2007. Cash was paid in lieu of issuing fractional shares. Earnings per share amounts and information with respect to stock options have been restated for all years presented to reflect the stock dividend.

The Company declared cash dividends of $0.045 per share in May and August 2007, respectively, and increased to $0.05 per share in November 2007. The Company declared cash dividends of $0.06 per share in January 2009 and November 2008, up from $0.05 per share in January 2008 and $0.055 per share in May and August 2008. On July 13, 2009, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had decided to suspend declaring quarterly dividends on its common stock.

The Company historically has been dependent on the payment of cash dividends from the Bank as the main source of liquidity to service its commitments and pay dividends to shareholders and other obligations. As noted earlier in this Report, the Order, Directive and the FRB Agreement prohibits the Bank from paying cash dividends to the Company without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the CDFI and the FRB. The inability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, absent other sources of funds, has, and is likely to continue to, adversely affect the liquidity of the Company.

Stock Repurchase

No shares of common stock were purchased during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and our repurchase plan was terminated.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2009 with respect to equity compensation plans. All plans have been approved by the shareholders.

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflecting in column (a)
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Plan Category

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan		139,539		11.90		—
2006 Incentive Stock Option Plan		169,710		12.30		191,430
2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan		97,420		12.21		28,840

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—

Total		406,669		—		220,270

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial condition and results of operations data as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005. This information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included herein and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein.

At or For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005

Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	629,729		$	703,390		$	556,815		$	503,514		$	461,839
Available-for-sale securities		50,951			56,416			40,661			26,516			15,118
Held-to-maturity securities		5,807			10,774			14,515			21,823			28,844
Federal Home Loan Bank restricted stock		8,652			8,652			6,886			5,892			6,198
Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank restricted stock		50			50			50			50			50

Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses		435,652			584,450			464,699			421,335			382,424
Loans Held-for-Sale		59,985			—			—			—			—
Deposits		487,217			460,301			361,175			369,805			313,399
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		119,085			183,085			146,508			86,251			107,812
Junior Subordinated Debentures		13,403			13,403			13,403			13,403			10,310
Long term debt		6,186			6,000			—			—			—
Other liabilities		4,077			3,228			2,797			3,175			3,472
Total stockholders’ equity		(239	)		37,373			32,933			30,881			26,845

Statement of Operations Data:
Interest income	$	39,985		$	43,172		$	39,041		$	35,815		$	28,724
Interest expense		16,668			19,864			21,482			18,185			11,728
Net interest income		23,317			23,308			17,559			17,630			16,996
Provision for loan losses		50,846			3,191			244			439			632
Net interest (loss)/income after provision for loan losses		(27,529	)		20,117			17,315			17,191			16,364
Noninterest income		2,161			2,187			2,546			2,176			1,634
Noninterest expenses		20,170			15,090			13,365			13,036			11,262
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes		(45,538	)		7,214			6,496			6,331			6,736
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes		(7,910	)		2,385			2,287			2,402			2,639
Net (Loss) Income	$	(37,628	)	$	4,829		$	4,209		$	3,929		$	4,097

Per Share Data:
(Loss) Earnings per share—Basic	$	(9.84	)	$	1.26		$	1.07		$	0.99		$	1.04
(Loss) Earnings per share—Diluted	$	(9.84	)		1.26			1.07			0.99			1.01
Common shares outstanding at end of period		3,823,634			3,823,634			3,818,284			3,960,852			3,937,239
Book value per share	$	(0.06	)	$	9.78		$	8.62		$	7.80		$	6.82

Performance Ratios and Other Data:
Net Interest Margin		3.45	%		3.79	%		3.50	%		3.71	%		3.89	%
Return on average assets		-5.39	%		0.76	%		0.81	%		0.81	%		0.92	%
Return on average stockholders equity		-115.2	%		13.7	%		12.9	%		13.8	%		16.5	%
Efficiency ratio		79.2	%		59.2	%		66.5	%		65.8	%		60.5	%

Tamalpais Bank Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 risk based capital		3.6	%		9.2	%		9.2	%		9.7	%		9.1	%
Total risk based capital		4.9	%		10.5	%		10.2	%		10.8	%		10.1	%
Tier 1 leverage capital		2.7	%		8.1	%		8.3	%		8.6	%		7.7	%

Tamalpais Bancorp Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 risk based capital		-0.1	%		—			—			—			—
Total risk based capital		-0.1	%		—			—			—			—
Tier 1 leverage capital		-0.1	%		—			—			—			—

Earnings per share, book value per share and common shares outstanding have been adjusted for the January 2007 7% stock dividend.

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements which have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the report of our independent registered public accountants, because of our obligations under the written agreements with our regulators, including among other things, restoring and maintaining our capital levels at amounts that would result in our capital ratios being sufficient for us to be considered well capitalized, our independent accountants believe there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are discussed in the “Business - Company Strategy.” The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Average balances, including balances used in calculating certain financial ratios, are generally comprised of average daily balances.

In January 2007, the Board of Directors declared a 7% stock dividend. Earnings per share and book value per share amounts have been restated for prior periods to reflect the stock dividend.

In September 2007, the Company received Board of Director approval to repurchase up to 5% of the share of the Company’s common stock over the next twelve months from the approval date in the open market. The repurchase plan represents approximately 200,649 of the Company’s then-outstanding shares as of July 28, 2007, as reported on the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 10, 2007. As of December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased 196,216 shares at prices ranging from $11.65 to $13.00 for a total cost of $2.5 million.

For discussion of stock dividends and share repurchases, see Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. The most complex accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. The Company has established detailed policies and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The following is a brief description of the current accounting policies involving significant management valuation judgments.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s best estimate of losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses charged to expense and reduced by loans charged-off, net of recoveries. The Company evaluates the allowance for loan loss on a quarterly basis and believes that the allowance for loan loss is a “critical accounting estimate” because it is based upon management’s assessment of various factors affecting the collectability of the loans, including current and projected economic conditions, past credit experience, delinquency status, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and a continuing review of the portfolio of loans and commitments. Management also obtains, from time to time, independent third party reviews and management assistance of the loan portfolio from outside consultants who have bank regulatory or credit experience and are familiar with applicable regulatory guidelines and industry practices.

The Bank determines the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, primarily on an analysis of the various components of the loan portfolio, including an analysis of all significant credits on an individual basis. The Bank segments the loan portfolios into as many components as practical. Each component would normally have similar characteristics, such as risk classification, past due status, type of loan, industry or collateral. The Bank analyzes the following components of the portfolio and provides for them in the allowance for loan losses:

	●	All significant credits, on an individual basis, that are classified doubtful.

	●	All other significant credits reviewed individually. If no allocation can be determined for such credits on an individual basis, they are provided for as part of an appropriate pool.

	●	All other loans that are not included by the credit grading system in the population of loans reviewed individually, but are delinquent or are classified or designated special mention (e.g. pools of smaller delinquent, special mention and classified commercial and industrial, and real estate loans).

	●	Homogenous loans that have not been reviewed individually, or are not delinquent, classified, or designated as special mention (e.g. pools of real estate mortgages).

	●	All other loans that have not been considered or provided for elsewhere (e.g. pools of commercial and industrial loans that have not been reviewed, classified, or designated special mention, standby letters of credit, and other off-balance sheet commitments to lend).

No assurance can be given that the Company will not sustain loan losses that are sizable in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio will not require an increase in the allowance. Prevailing factors in association with the methodology may include improvement or deterioration of individual commitments or pools of similar loans, or loan concentrations.

Available-for-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale securities are required to be carried at fair value. This is a “critical accounting estimate” in that the fair value of a security is based on quoted market prices or if quoted market prices are not available, fair values are extrapolated from the quoted prices of similar instruments. Adjustments to the available-for-sale securities fair value impact the consolidated financial statements by increasing or decreasing assets and shareholders’ equity.

Loans-Held-for-Sale

Any loan that management determines will not be held-to-maturity is classified as held-for-sale and are valued at fair value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is determined based upon an analysis of investor quoted pricing inputs.

Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan

The Company has entered into supplemental employee retirement agreements with certain executive officers. The liability is based on estimates involving life expectancy, length of time before retirement, appropriate discount rate, forfeiture rates and expected benefit levels. Should these estimates prove materially different from actual results, the Company could incur additional or reduced future expense.

Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred income taxes reflect the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws and regulations. The Company uses an estimate of future earnings to assess whether the benefit of the deferred tax assets will be realized. If future pre-tax income is forecasted to be negative or less than the amount of the deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they may be applied, the deferred tax assets may not be fully realized and, in such cases, a deferred tax valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amounts estimated to be realizable.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments such as stock options granted to employees. The Company records compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that were outstanding on January 1, 2006 and for all awards granted after that date as they vest. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant and amortized over the service period using an option pricing model. Critical assumptions that affect the estimated fair value of each option include expected stock price volatility, dividend yield, option life and the risk-free interest rate.

Fair Value

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted enhanced disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. These disclosures establish a hierarchical framework associated with the level of observable pricing scenarios utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of the observable pricing scenario. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of observable pricing and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no observable pricing and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Observable pricing scenarios are impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established and the characteristics specific to the transaction.

Accounting Change

For a description of the recent pronouncements applicable to the Company, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.

SUMMARY

Results of Operations

The Company reported on a consolidated basis a net loss of $37,628,000 for 2009 as compared to net income of $4,829,000 for 2008, a decrease of $42,457,000, or 879.3%. Diluted loss per share was $9.84 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to diluted earnings per share of $1.26 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of 880.2%.

Results for the fiscal year 2009 were negatively impacted by the substantial increase in the provision for loan losses recorded for loans sold in the fourth quarter of 2009 and for loans planned to be sold in the first quarter of 2010 subject to regulatory approval, general loan loss provision, as well as non-cash charges of $11.2 million for the valuation allowance established against the deferred tax asset due to the significant doubt as to the ability of the Company to realize those deferred tax assets against positive taxable income in future years. The ongoing and deepening recession has caused a continuing decline in real estate values and has reduced the liquidity and net worth of businesses and consumers in the Company’s market area. The loan loss provision in the year ended December 31, 2009 was $50,846,000, as compared to $3,191,000 for the prior year.

The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans held for investment was increased to 5.03% as of December 31, 2009, up from 1.37% as of December 31, 2008 to better position the Company to manage through a prolonged economic downturn.

Net interest income before provision for loan losses of $23,316,000 increased $8,000 from the same period last year. The Bank increased total deposits 5.8% over the last twelve months and increased noninterest-bearing deposits to $43,362,000, up 30.4% over the last twelve months. The success in generating low-cost deposits was one of the factors for net interest income increasing for the year.

In 2008, the Federal Reserve lowered its Federal funds rate (the rate at which banks may borrow from each other) by two hundred basis points resulting in lower deposit rates being offered by the Bank, which positively affected the interest margin. However, the variable rate loans adjusted downward with the decline in the Prime Rate, subject to any contractual floor rates. Even though these changes resulted in improvements to the net interest margin in the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the prior year, these improvements were more than offset by the increase in nonperforming assets, which decreased the yield of the loan portfolio for the respective periods. The slight increase in net interest income was more than offset by the increase in loan loss provisions related to substandard and nonperforming loans, an $11.2 million valuation reserve established against the deferred tax assets and by the $5.1 million increase in noninterest expense in 2009 as compared to the prior year.

The decrease in net income and fully diluted earnings per share for 2009 over the same period in 2008 was primarily the result of the following:

	●	For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, interest income decreased $3,188,000, or 7.4% which was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest income on overnight and other investments of $273,000, or 91.6% over the same period in the prior year and a decrease in interest and fees on loans of $2,904,000, or 7.3% which were primarily due to the increase in nonperforming loans, over the same periods prior year.

	●	The provision for loan losses in the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 was $50,846,000 as compared to a provision of $3,191,000 in the same period prior year. The increase in the provision reflects an increased allowance as a result of the current economic environment and the ongoing efforts to monitor and control credit risk.

	●	Noninterest expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 increased $5,080,000, or 33.7% over the same period in the prior year and is primarily attributable to the following. Other administrative expenses increased $3,978,000, or 148.0% as a result of an increase in loss provision for OREO, an increase for the reserve in off-balance-sheet commitments, and an increase in FDIC deposit insurance. Professional expenses increased $1,648,000, or 244.4% and advertising expenses increased $239,000, or 77.7% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 over the same period in the prior year. These increases, which were primarily the result of expenses for ongoing strategic initiatives related to regulatory oversight, were partially offset by a decrease in salaries and benefits of $698,000, or 8.2%.

	●	Noninterest income decreased $26,000, or 1.2% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a loss on sale of loans of $67,000 and a loss on sale of other real estate owned of $474,000 partially offset by an increase in a net gain on sale of securities of $778,000 with no significant corresponding gains on sales of securities in the same period prior year.

Partially offsetting the increase in the provision for loan losses, decreases in interest income, increases in noninterest expense and decreases in noninterest income, which had negative impacts on net income, were decreases in interest expense, which had positive impacts on net income as follows:

●

Interest expense decreased $3,196,000, or 16.1% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 respectively, as compared to the same period in the prior year, which was primarily due to interest expense on deposits decreasing $2,858,000, or 23.8% and a decrease in interest expense on borrowed funds of $501,000, or 7.1%.

There were $59,985,443 in Loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, and none for the same period in 2008. There were $2,498,130, $1,219,382 and $12,021,000 carrying value of loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, that were sold in January, February and March 2010, respectively. Additionally, there were $3,264,458 principal balance of loans not classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, that were sold in March 2010. The first quarter of 2010 sales of the loans classified as held-for-sale and the sale of the other loans resulted in a net pre-tax gain on sale of $705,647. See Note 25 of this report for further discussion.

Financial Condition

The Company began to manage down the size of its balance sheet during the third quarter 2009 to improve liquidity, the funding mix and manage capital resources. As of December 31, 2009, consolidated total assets were $629,729,000 as compared to $703,390,000 at December 31, 2008, which represents a decrease of $73,661,000, or 10.5%. As of December 31, 2009, there were annual decreases in investment securities of $10,431,000, or 15.5%, and net loans receivable of $148,797,000, or 25.5%. The decrease in investment securities was primarily due to pay downs in the held-to-maturity securities and $19,599,000 of available-for-sale securities which were sold in 2009 as compared to $4,259,000 in 2008. The decrease in loans was primarily attributable to the sale of loans sold during the fiscal year 2009 as well as $75 million principal amount of loans reclassified to Held-for-Sale classification. During the third quarter 2009, the Company sold approximately $19.8 million in loans at par value and during the fourth quarter 2009, the Company sold approximately $37,432,000 million in principal amount of certain nonperforming loans. In connection with this sale, the Company received proceeds of approximately $23,903,000 million and incurred a pre-tax charge of approximately $4,735,000 million to its fourth quarter earnings. The proceeds from the sale were primarily used to reduce outstanding borrowings. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in Federal funds sold of $15,001,000 from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 and was primarily due to the Bank bolstering its on-balance sheet liquidity. As of December 31, 2009, other real estate owned increased by $3,170,000, or 760.3%, and other assets increased by $10,425,000, or 138.5% as compared to December 31, 2008. The increase in other assets was primarily due to an increase in the income taxes receivable which resulted from the large taxable loss during the fiscal year 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year.

As of December 31, 2009, consolidated total liabilities were $629,968,000 as compared to $666,017,000 at December 31, 2008, which represents a decrease of 5.4%. Contributing to the decrease in liabilities during the fiscal year 2009 was an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits of $10,102,000, or 30.4% and certificates of deposits of $47,224,000, or 18.1%, partially offset by decreases in money market and savings deposits of $27,846,000, or 17.8% and decrease in FHLB advances of $64,000,000, or 35.0% as compared to December 31, 2008. FHLB advances decreased as the growth in deposits and loans which were sold during 2009 enabled us to pay down these borrowings. The Bank is reducing its reliance on FHLB borrowings but when necessary the FHLB borrowings are used to hedge interest rate risk in the loan and investment portfolios and mature evenly on a monthly basis.

Shareholders’ equity decreased $37,612,000, or 100.6% to $(239,000) at December 31, 2009 as compared to $37,373,000 at December 31, 2008. This was attributable to a net loss of $37,628,000, share-based compensation expense of $232,000, cash dividends declared of $229,000 and an unrealized security holding loss of $174,000 partially offset by an unrealized gain on a cash flow hedge of $187,000.

As of December 31, 2009, TWA had approximately $349.3 million in assets under management as compared to $254.0 million for the same period prior year. The increase was primarily due to increases in the institutional fixed income portfolio and market appreciation.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s return on average assets (“ROA”) was (5.39)% compared to 0.76% for the same period in 2008. The ROA was negative primarily due to the high loan loss provisions and large deferred tax asset valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009. The Company’s return on average equity (“ROE”) was (115.17)% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 13.74% for the same period last year. The Company’s ROE was negative due to the extremely large loss that the Company posted in fiscal year 2009.

The Bank is focusing on lowering the cost of funds and improving the core funding mix by generating low cost deposits through the Marin County based team of business banking professionals and paying off wholesale funding sources.

Summary of Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table below sets forth the results of operations for the four quarters of 2009 and 2008.

	2009 Quarters Ended												2008 Quarters Ended
	Dec. 31			Sept. 30			June 30			Mar. 31			Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		Mar. 31
Interest income	$	8,699		$	9,795		$	10,647		$	10,839		$	11,007	$	11,220	$	10,722	$	10,224
Interest expense		3,813			4,408			4,064			4,383			4,809		5,012		4,890		5,153
Net interest Income		4,886			5,387			6,583			6,456			6,198		6,208		5,832		5,071
Provision for loan losses		27,411			9,431			10,620			3,384			1,594		653		599		345
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan losses		(22,525	)		(4,044	)		(4,037	)		3,072			4,604		5,555		5,233		4,726
Noninterest income		387			751			472			555			523		523		477		664
Noninterst expense		6,371			5,727			4,131			3,940			3,905		3,785		3,763		3,636
(Loss) Income before provision for income taxes		(28,509	)		(9,020	)		(7,696	)		(313	)		1,222		2,293		1,947		1,754
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes		(314	)		(3,922	)		(3,403	)		(271	)		372		807		681		526
Net (Loss) Income	$	(28,195	)	$	(5,098	)	$	(4,293	)	$	(42	)	$	850	$	1,486	$	1,266	$	1,228
Net (Loss) Income per common share
Basic	$	(7.37	)	$	(1.33	)	$	(1.12	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.22	$	0.39	$	0.33	$	0.32
Diluted	$	(7.37	)	$	(1.33	)	$	(1.12	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.22	$	0.39	$	0.33	$	0.32

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, investments and other interest earning assets and the interest expense on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities, and is the most significant component of the Company’s revenue.

Net interest income is impacted by changes in general market interest rates and by changes in the amounts and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Comparisons of net interest income are frequently made using net interest margin and net interest rate spread. Net interest margin is expressed as net interest income divided by average earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest earning assets and the average rate incurred on total interest bearing liabilities. Both of these measures are reported on a taxable equivalent basis. Net interest margin is the higher of the two because it reflects interest income earned on assets funded with non-interest bearing sources of funds, which includes demand deposits and stockholders’ equity.

The average balance of nonperforming loans is included in the average balance of loans. Because nonperforming loans do not accrue income, an increase in nonperforming loans will result in a decrease in loan and asset yields.

As of December 31, 2009 compared to 2008, interest earned on interest-bearing assets declined faster than costs of interest bearing liabilities resulting in a thirty four basis point decrease in the net interest margin and thirty basis point decrease in the net interest spread. As of December 31, 2008 compared to 2007, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined faster than yields on earning assets, resulting in a twenty nine basis point increase in net interest margin. The following table presents average daily balances of assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity during 2009, 2008 and 2007, along with total interest income earned and expense paid, and the average yields earned or rates paid thereon and the net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Average Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

	For the Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2009								2008								2007
				Interest		Yields						Interest		Yields						Interest		Yields
	Average			Income/		Earned/			Average			Income/		Earned/			Average			Income/		Earned/
	Balance			Expense		Paid			Balance			Expense		Paid			Balance			Expense		Paid
Assets
Investment securities - Muni’s (1,2)	$	4,667		$	184		5.66	%	$	6,307		$	248		5.54	%	$	3,116		$	123		5.57	%
Investment securities - Taxable (2)		60,629			2,561		4.22	%		51,606			2,433		4.71	%		49,496			2,327		4.70	%
Other investments		9,521			25		0.26	%		8,031			298		3.71	%		5,348			293		5.48	%
Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions		515			21		4.08	%		669			31		4.63	%		899			40		4.45	%
Federal funds sold		15,928			46		0.29	%		6,301			111		1.76	%		3,129			161		5.15	%
Loans (3)		583,476			37,148		6.37	%		541,544			40,051		7.40	%		439,262			36,097		8.22	%
Loans Held-for-Sale		164			—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—
Total Interest Earning Assets		674,900			39,985		5.92	%		614,458			43,172		7.03	%		501,250			39,041		7.79	%
Allowance for loan losses		(15,784	)							(5,790	)							(4,663	)
Cash and due from banks		4,791								4,430								4,425
Net premises, furniture and equipment		3,680								4,319								4,998
Other assets		30,384								19,296								14,426
Total Assets	$	697,971							$	636,713							$	520,436

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest bearing checking	$	8,664			24		0.28	%	$	7,193			44		0.61	%	$	7,513			46		0.61	%
Savings deposits (4)		166,420			2,126		1.28	%		151,014			3,576		2.37	%		153,199			6,336		4.14	%
Time deposits		270,069			6,979		2.58	%		228,140			8,367		3.67	%		183,671			9,415		5.13	%
Other borrowings		160,126			6,527		4.08	%		167,854			7,028		4.19	%		103,088			4,562		4.43	%
Long term debt		6,010			289		4.79	%		4,011			213		5.31	%		—			—		—
Junior Subordinated Debentures		13,403			724		5.40	%		13,403			636		4.75	%		15,135			1,123		7.42	%
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities		624,692			16,669		2.67	%		571,615			19,864		3.48	%		462,606			21,482		4.64	%
Noninterest deposits		37,825								26,562								20,764
Other liabilities		2,782								3,401								4,406
Total Liabilities		665,299								601,578								487,776
Shareholders’ Equity		32,672								35,135								32,660
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	697,971							$	636,713							$	520,436

Net interest income				$	23,316							$	23,308							$	17,559
Net interest spread (5)							3.25	%							3.55	%							3.15	%
Net interest margin (6)							3.45	%							3.79	%							3.50	%

(1) Yields on securities and certain loans have been adjusted upward to a “fully taxable equivalent” (“FTE”) basis in order to reflect the effect of income which is exempt from federal income taxation at the current statutory tax rate.

(2) The yields for securities were computed using the average amortized cost and therefore do not give effect for changes in fair value.

(3) Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans but do not reflect average reserves for possible loan losses.

(4) Savings deposits include Money Market accounts.

(5) Net interest spread is the interest differential between total interest earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities.

(6) Net interest margin is the net yield on average interest earning assets.

In 2009, the Bank’s net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $8,000 over 2008 primarily due to a decrease in interest expense attributable to the decline in cost of funds partially offset by lower loan yields that were a result of nonperforming loans. The decrease of $3,187,000 in interest income on interest earning assets was primarily due to a decline in interest income on the loan portfolio. In 2008, the Bank’s net interest income before provision for loan losses increased $5,749,000 as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to a decrease in the cost of deposits related to interest bearing liabilities in addition to an increase in interest income on the loan portfolio driven by higher loan balances.

2009 Compared to 2008

The Bank’s yield on average interest earning assets decreased to 5.92% as of December 31, 2009 from 7.03% as of December 31, 2008 as a result of the following.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the Bank’s Net Interest Margin (“NIM”) was 3.45%, a decrease from the NIM of 3.79% for the same period in 2008. The decrease in the NIM in 2009 as compared to the same period of the prior year is primarily attributable to the Bank’s lower cost of funds in response to ongoing decreases in the Federal funds rates and discount rates resulting in lower funding costs and an improved funding mix which was more than offset by lower loan yields in a declining interest rate environment and interest foregone on non-accrual loans. The Bank’s yield on average interest earning assets decreased from 7.03% for 2008 to 5.92% for the year ended 2009 as a result of the factors described below.

The yield on the loan portfolio decreased one hundred and three basis points from 7.40% in 2008 to 6.37% for the year ended December 31, 2009 which is primarily attributable to the non-recognition of accrued interest income for the large balance of nonperforming loans during 2009 as well as the effect of competitive pressures on rates offered by the Bank due to decreases in interest rates implemented by the Federal Reserve Board in 2008. The yield on the Bank’s Federal funds sold decreased to 0.29% for 2009 from 1.76% in 2008. The decrease in the yields on loans and Federal Funds sold is the result of the Federal Reserve decreasing the Federal funds interest rate in 2008 as discussed previously. The average balance of investment securities – taxable in 2009 of $60,629,000 which represents an increase of $9,023,000 from 2008, had a decrease in yield from 4.71% in 2008 to 4.22% in 2009. Again, the decrease in yield was a function of purchasing more securities with lower yields than the yields on securities that matured or had balance reductions. Other investments yield decreased to 0.26% in 2009 from 3.71% in 2008. The yield on interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions decreased fifty-five basis points in 2009 as compared to 2008. The yield on investment securities for municipal securities increased from 5.54% in 2008 to 5.66% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The rate paid on average interest bearing liabilities decreased from 3.48% to 2.67% when comparing 2009 to the same period a year ago. The rate paid on savings deposits decreased from 2.37% in 2008 to 1.28% in 2009 and the rate paid on time deposits decreased from 3.67% in 2008 to 2.58% in 2009. These decreases are primarily attributable to the result of the previously discussed changes in market interest rates due to actions taken by the Federal Reserve in 2008. The rate on other borrowings decreased eleven basis points for 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The rate paid on junior subordinated debentures increased sixty-five basis points in the 2009 period when compared to 2008, and the rate paid on adjustable-rate long term debt of $6 million decreased fifty-two basis points in 2009 as compared to the same period a year ago.

2008 Compared to 2007

In 2008, the Bank’s NIM was 3.79%, an increase of 8.3% from the NIM of 3.50% in 2007. The increase in the NIM in 2008 as compared to the same period prior year is primarily attributable to the Bank’s lower cost of funds in response to ongoing decreases in the Federal funds rates and discount rates resulting in lower funding costs partially offset by lower loan yields in a declining interest rate environment.

The Bank’s yield on average interest earning assets decreased to 7.03% as of December 31, 2008 from 7.79% as of December 31, 2007 as a result of the following.

The yield on the loan portfolio decreased eighty two basis points from 8.22% in 2007 to 7.40% in 2008 which is primarily a result of the growth in loans held in the portfolio partially offset by the effect of competitive pressures on rates offered by the Bank as a result of a decrease in the interest rates implemented by the Federal Reserve Board in 2008. The yield on the loan originations were lower and maturities and paydowns of loans were at higher yields. The yield on the Bank’s Federal funds sold decreased to 1.76% in 2008 from 5.15% in 2007. The decrease in the yield for the Federal funds sold is the result of the Federal Reserve decreasing the Federal funds interest rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for short term borrowings) in 2008 by two hundred basis points. The yield on the investment securities – taxable in 2008 remained relatively unchanged as compared to the same period for 2007. The yield on other investments decreased to 3.71% in 2008 from 5.48% in 2007. The yield on interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions increased eighteen basis points from 2008 as compared to 2007.

The rate paid on average interest bearing liabilities decreased from 4.64% to 3.48% when comparing 2008 versus 2007. The rate paid on saving deposits decreased from 4.14% to 2.37% from 2007 as compared to 2008 and the rate paid on time deposits decreased one hundred forty six basis points from 5.13% to 3.67% from 2007 as compared to 2008. These decreases are primarily attributable to the result of the previously discussed decreases in market interest rates originating from actions taken by the Federal Reserve in 2008. The rate on other borrowings decreased twenty four basis points from 2008 as compared to 2007. The junior subordinated rate paid on debentures decreased from 7.42% to 4.75% at 2008 when compared to 2007. The decrease in the interest rate paid on debentures is attributable to the Company obtaining an issuance of $10 million in new trust preferred securities that bears a floating interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 1.44% as compared to the Company’s existing securities which bore a floating interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.65% which was redeemed with proceeds of the new issuance. New long term debt for $6 million was obtained in 2008 which had an average cost of 5.31%

Analysis of Volume and Rate Changes on Net Interest Income and Expenses

The following sets forth changes in interest income and interest expense for each major category of average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the amount of change attributable to volume and rate changes for the periods indicated. Changes not solely attributable to volume or rate have been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the changes in each.

	Year ended December 31, 2009									Year ended December 31, 2008
	Compared to Year ended December 31, 2008									Compared to Year ended December 31, 2007
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Increase/(decrease) in	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Income
Investment securities	$	324		$	(260	)	$	64		$	245		$	(14	)	$	231
Other investments		47			(320	)		(273	)		118			(113	)		5
Interest-bearing deposits		(7	)		(3	)		(10	)		(11	)		2			(9	)
Federal Funds Sold		78			(143	)		(65	)		98			(148	)		(50	)
Loans		2,958			(5,861	)		(2,903	)		7,817			(3,863	)		3,954
		3,400			(6,587	)		(3,187	)		8,267			(4,136	)		4,131

Increase/(decrease) in
Interest Expense
Interest-bearing checking	$	8		$	(28	)	$	(20	)	$	(2	)	$	—			(2	)
Savings deposits		334			(1,784	)		(1,450	)		(89	)		(2,671	)		(2,760	)
Time Deposits		1,364			(2,752	)		(1,388	)		1,981			(3,029	)		(1,048	)
FHLB and other borrowings		(238	)		(188	)		(426	)		2,908			(228	)		2,680
Junior Subordinated Debt		0			88			88			(117	)		(371	)		(488	)
		1,468			(4,664	)		(3,196	)		4,681			(6,299	)		(1,618	)
Increase/(decrease) in
Net Interest Income	$	1,932		$	(1,923	)	$	9		$	3,586		$	2,163		$	5,749

Non-interest Income

Non-interest income is comprised of (loss) gain on sale of loans, net, gain (loss) on sale of securities, net, (loss) on sale of other real estate owned, net, loan servicing income, fees generated by TWA and other income. Non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $2,161,000, $2,187,000 and $2,546,000, respectively, for a decrease of $26,000, or 1.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared with the same period in 2008, and a decrease of $359,000, or 14.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared with the same period in 2007.

The following table sets forth information regarding the non-interest income for the periods shown.

									2009 compared to 2008						2008 compared to 2007
	For the Year Ended December 31,								Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	For the Year Ended December 31,								Increase			Increase			Increase			Increase
	2009			2008			2007		(Decrease)			(Decrease)			(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
(Loss) Gain on sale of loans, net	$	(67	)	$	182		$	585	$	(249	)		-136.8	%	$	(403	)		-68.9	%
Gain (Loss) on sale of securities, net		784			(6	)		—	$	790			-13166.7	%	$	(6	)		0.0	%
(Loss) on sale of other real estate owned, net		(474	)		—			—	$	(474	)		0.0	%		—			—
Loan servicing		167			182			179	$	(15	)		-8.2	%	$	3			1.7	%
Registered Investment Advisory Services fee income		540			600			601	$	(60	)		-10.0	%	$	(1	)		-0.2	%
Other income		1,211			1,229			1,181	$	(18	)		-1.5	%	$	48			4.1	%
Total	$	2,161		$	2,187		$	2,546	$	(26	)		-1.2	%	$	(359	)		-14.1	%

2009 resulted in a loss on sale of loans as compared to an increase in 2008. The Bank lost approximately $67,000 in loan sales in 2009, which includes the cost of brokerage commissions, as compared to a gain on sale of loans of $182,000 in 2008. In 2008 as compared to 2007, the (loss) gain on sale of loans, net, decreased $403,000, or 68.9%. This decrease was primarily due to the Bank not selling the government guaranteed portions of the SBA loans in 2008 as compared to 2007. Loan sales in 2008 were limited to SBA 504 loans for which the Bank did not receive as large a premium.

In 2009 as compared to 2008, gain (loss) on sale of securities, net, increased $790,000. This increase is attributable to the Bank selling securities in the third and fourth quarter of 2009, to generate liquid funds and paydown FHLB borrowings, with no significant corresponding gains on sales of securities in the same periods for the prior year. In 2008 as compared to 2007, loss on sale of securities, net, remained relatively unchanged.

In 2009, there was a loss on sale of other real estate owned (“OREO”) of $474,000 with no losses or gains on sales of OREO for the same period in the prior year.

Loan servicing income for 2009 was $167,000, representing a decrease of $15,000, or 8.2% over the same period prior year which is primarily attributable to the Bank servicing less loans in 2009 as compared to 2008. Loan servicing income in 2008 was $182,000, representing an increase of $3,000, or 1.7% over the same period the prior year. These increases are attributable to the increase in the number of loans that the Bank is servicing for others.

Advisory Services fee income from 2009 as compared to 2008 decreased $60,000, or 10.0%. The decrease was primarily attributable to the market declines affecting fees associated with its high net worth portfolio partially offset by the growth in the institutional fixed income portfolio. In 2008 as compared to 2007, the Advisory Services fee income remained relatively unchanged.

In 2009, TWA had approximately $349.3 million in assets under management of which $57.1 million represents the Bank’s investment portfolio. In 2008, TWA had approximately $283.0 million in assets under management of which $67.4 million represents the Bank’s investment portfolio. TWA has required capital infusions from the Company. In 2009, 2008 and 2007 capital infusions totaled $112,500, $165,000 and $115,000, respectively.

On January 29, 2010, TWA entered into an agreement with CSI Capital Management (“CSI”) whereby the staff of TWA was absorbed by CSI and its clients were referred to the San Francisco-based firm. Under terms of the agreement, the Company will share the revenues from the clients referred to CSI for a period of five years.

Other income decreased $18,000, or 1.5% in 2009 as compared to the same period prior year. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decreases in application fee income of $8,800, travelers expense fee income of $13,000, reconveyance fee income of $4,400, Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) interest income of $76,000 due to declining interest rates, NSF fees decreased $33,000 as a result of decreasing service charges on checks drawn against insufficient funds, and debit card fee income decreased $14,000. Partially offsetting these decreases were an increase in return deposited item charges of $28,000, and ATM fee income of $18,000 and a recovery on “other than temporary impaired charge” of $103,000 related to Municipal Securities from 2009 as compared to 2008.

Other income increased $48,000, or 4.1% in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to the Bank obtaining a BOLI policy in April 2007 which contributed $54,000 to other income. NSF fees increased $66,000 as a result of management’s efforts to increase service charges on checks drawn against insufficient funds. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in miscellaneous fee income of $43,000.

Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, advertising, professional, data processing, equipment and depreciation and other administrative expenses. The Company’s non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $20,170,000, $15,090,000 and $13,365,000, respectively. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $5,080,000, or 33.7% as compared with the same period in 2008 and the increase for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $1,725,000, or 12.9% as compared with the same period in 2007.

							2009 compared to 2008						2008 compared to 2007
	For the Year Ended December 31,						Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	For the Year Ended December 31,						Increase			Increase			Increase			Increase
	2009		2008		2007		(Decrease)			(Decrease)			(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and benefits	$	7,791	$	8,489	$	7,336	$	(698	)		-8.2	%	$	1,153			15.7	%
Occupancy		1,421		1,482		1,469		(61	)		-4.1	%		13			0.9	%
Advertising		547		308		369		239			77.6	%		(61	)		-16.5	%
Professional		2,322		674		738		1,648			244.5	%		(64	)		-8.7	%
Data processing		666		610		469		56			9.2	%		141			30.1	%
Equipment and depreciation		757		839		900		(82	)		-9.8	%		(61	)		-6.8	%
Other administrative		6,666		2,688		2,084		3,978			148.0	%		604			29.0	%
Total	$	20,170	$	15,090	$	13,365	$	5,080			33.7	%	$	1,725			12.9	%

Salaries and benefits are the largest components of non-interest expense. In 2009, salaries and benefits decreased by $698,000, or 8.2%. This Company’s full time equivalent (“FTE”) employees decreased with FTE of 72 as of December 31, 2009 compared to FTE of 80 as of December 31, 2008. The decrease in salaries and benefits is primarily attributable to elimination of bonus accruals and lower employee commissions in 2009 as compared to 2008. Additionally, there were lower capitalization of deferred loan costs. Partially offsetting these decreases, there were increases in salaries and wages and workers compensation insurance in 2009 as compared to 2008.

In 2008, salaries and benefits increased by $1,153,000, or 15.7% compared to 2007. The increase is primarily due to the Company’s planned increases in full time equivalent (“FTE”) employees. The Company expanded its staff and management to 80 FTE in 2008 as compared to 77 for the same period prior year to strengthen its commercial and small business banking operations. Additionally, the Company had a higher incentive bonus accrual and commission payouts, regular salary adjustments, payroll taxes and higher employee and medical benefits for 2008 as compared to 2007.

The 2009 decrease of $61,000, or 4.1% in occupancy and equipment costs is largely due to the decreases in the amortization of tenant improvements and service and maintenance expense as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase of $13,000, or 0.9% in occupancy in 2008 as compared to 2007 is primarily attributable to the annual rental adjustments in the branch and administrative facilities.

Advertising costs from 2009 to 2008 increased $239,000, or 77.6%. The Company increased advertising expenses for the Bank in the second and third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same periods prior year. Advertising costs for 2008 as compared to 2007 decreased $61,000, or 16.5%. The Company reduced the promotional expenses in 2008 as compared to the same period prior year.

Professional services increased $1,648,000, or 244.5% in 2009 compared to the same period prior year. The increase in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily attributable to increased consulting expenses for ongoing strategic and regular oversight initiatives related to regulatory oversight, loan related legal expenses and non-recurring costs due to a legal settlement. Professional services decreased $64,000, or 8.7% in 2008 as compared to 2007. The decrease is largely attributable to the Company obtaining additional outside consulting services for compliance and marketing in 2007 as compared to 2008.

Data processing costs increased $56,000, or 9.2% in 2009 as compared to 2008 and $141,000, or 30.1% in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increases are largely attributable to an increase in third party IT support.

Equipment and depreciation expense for 2009 as compared to 2008 decreased $82,000, or 9.8% and decreased $61,000, or 6.8% in 2008 as compared to 2007. The decrease in 2009 as compared to 2008 is due to decreases in depreciation expense, service and maintenance expense and purchasing expense as compared to the same period prior year. The decrease in 2008 as compared to 2007 is primarily attributable to fewer new purchases and leasehold improvements being made in 2008 as compared to 2007.

Other administrative expenses in 2009 of $6,666,000 represents an increase of $3,978,000, or 40.3% increase over 2008. The increases are primarily attributable to an increase in FDIC insurance premiums of $1,650,000 as a result of an industry wide FDIC insurance special assessment of $321,000 and deposit insurance premiums that were higher due to the FDIC’s increase in deposit insurance premium rates, loss provision of $1,014,000 for OREO, loss on extinguishment of debt of $441,000, and OREO operating expenses of $579,000. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases of office supplies of $45,000.

Other administrative expenses in 2008 of $2,688,000 represents an increase of $604,000, or 29.0% increase over 2007. The increase is attributable to increases in item processing expense of $29,000, CDARS fee expense of $42,000, SBA loan servicing of $21,000, FDIC insurance premiums of $193,000, office supplies of $41,000, ATM/Debit card expense of $36,000, finance and bank charges of $21,000, D&O liability insurance of $17,000 and amortization of the Affordable Housing Project of $195,000 partially offset by a decrease in hazard insurance services of $21,000 from 2008 as compared to 2007.

The efficiency ratio measures the Company’s productivity. It is the cost required to generate each dollar of revenue. The Company’s efficiency ratio (the ratio of non-interest expense divided by the sum of non-interest income and net interest income) was 79.2% and 59.2% in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Bank formally assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The Bank provides as an expense an amount needed to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level necessary to provide adequate coverage for probable loan losses. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated based on several factors, including growth of the loan portfolio, analysis of probable losses in the portfolio and recent loss experience. Actual losses on loans are charged against the allowance, and the allowance is increased through the provision for loan losses charged to expense. The allowance is relieved of any applicable loss reserves when loans are reclassified to Held for Sale classification.

The U.S. economy is experiencing significantly reduced business activity as a result of, among other factors, disruptions in the financial system, dramatic declines in the housing market and increasing unemployment rate. In 2009 there has been continued volatility and illiquidity in the financial markets, witnessing the failure of well-known companies and including a national recession. The loan quality has shown significant weakness as a result of general and local economic conditions and could deteriorate even further. Consequently, the Bank has increased the provision for loan losses in 2009 and the book value of specific assets were written down to reflect current fair market values in this recessionary economy.

In 2009 the provision for loan losses was $50,846,000 as compared to $3,191,000 in 2008, representing an increase of $47,655,000, or 1493.4%. The increase in the specific and general loan loss provision includes provisions related to downgraded loans, loans sold during the year, loans reclassed to held-for-sale classification and provisions for specifically impaired loans. The provision for loan losses reflects the amount deemed necessary to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in the portfolio. The provision for loan losses was $3,191,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $2,947,000, or 1208.0% as compared to 2007. The increase in the provision was the result of growth in the Bank’s loan portfolio and deterioration in credit quality, and an increased provision associated with specific nonperforming loans.

Income Taxes

The Company reported a benefit of $7,910,000 for 2009 as compared to a provision for income taxes of $2,386,000 and $2,287,000, respectively, for years 2008 and 2007 a decrease of $10,296,000, or 431.5% for 2009 as compared to 2008 and an increase of $99,000, or 4.3% for 2008 as compared to 2007. The provision/(benefit) reflects accruals for taxes at the applicable rates for federal income and California franchise taxes based upon reported pre-tax income/(loss) and adjusted for the effects of all permanent differences between income for tax and financial reporting purposes. The Company manages its effective tax rate through tax benefits associated through the purchase of Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) (the revenue from BOLI is tax exempt), earnings on qualified municipal securities which are primarily tax exempt, tax credits associated with Affordable Housing Fund investments and lending in Enterprise Zones.

In December 2009, due to the uncertainty about the Company’s ability to generate taxable income in the near term, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $11,231,000 against its deferred tax assets. The Company will not be able to recognize the tax benefits until it can show that it is more likely than not that it will generate enough taxable income in future periods to realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets and loss carry forwards.

See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of the Provision for Income Taxes.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investment Securities

The Company purchases mortgage-backed securities and other high quality investments as a source of interest income, credit risk diversification, manage rate sensitivity, and maintain a reserve of liquid assets that can be pledged or sold to meet liquidity and loan requirements. Sales of “Federal Funds” and short-term loans to other banks are regularly utilized. Placement of funds in certificates of deposit with other financial institutions may be made as alternative investments pending utilization of funds for loans or other purposes. Securities may be pledged to meet security requirements imposed as a condition to secure Federal Home Loan Bank advances, the receipt of public fund deposits and for other purposes. Investment securities are held in safekeeping by an independent custodian. The Bank does not hold common or preferred stock of either the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) or non-agency backed securities.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying values of securities pledged were $6,522,089 and $67,190,000, respectively; the amount pledged at December 31, 2008 represented the entire investment securities portfolio. Not all of the securities pledged as collateral were required to secure existing borrowings. The Company utilizes the cash flow of the investments to meet the overall liquidity requirements.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the investment portfolio consisted of agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. agency securities, municipal securities and agency guaranteed collateralized mortgage obligations. Throughout 2009 the Company pursued a strategy to purchase GNMA securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The Company also owned $8,652,000 in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $50,000 of Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank stock as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Interest-bearing time deposits in other financial institutions amounted to $179,000 and $558,000 as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

At December 31, 2009, $5,807,181 of the securities were classified as held-to-maturity and $50,951,388 of the securities were classified as available-for-sale. At December 31, 2008, $10,774,000 of the securities were classified as held-to-maturity and $56,416,000 of the Company’s securities were classified as available-for-sale. The Federal Home Loan Bank stock and the Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank stock are not classified since they have no stated maturities. Available-for-sale securities are bonds, notes, debentures, and certain equity securities that are not classified as trading securities or as held-to-maturity securities. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported as a net amount in a separate component of capital until realized. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the specific identification method. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities consist of bonds, notes and debentures for which the Company has the positive intent and the ability to hold to maturity and are reported at cost, adjusted for premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity.

The following tables summarize the amounts and distribution of the Company’s investment securities, held as of the dates indicated, and the weighted average yields:

	As of December 31, 2009
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-sale
Mortgage backed securities
Issued by FNMA	$	4,404	$	73	$	(1	)	$	4,476
Issued by FHLMC		2,194		25		—			2,219
Issued by GNMA		936		50		—			986
	$	7,534	$	148	$	(1	)	$	7,681
U.S. Agency Securities
Issued by FHLB	$	1,172	$	37	$	—		$	1,209
Issued by Other Agency		1,800		10		—			1,810
	$	2,972	$	47	$	—		$	3,019
Municipal Securities
Rated AAA	$	2,814	$	25	$	(19	)	$	2,820
Rated A		324		2		(6	)		320
Unrated		202		—		(1	)		201
	$	3,340	$	27	$	(26	)	$	3,341
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
Issued by FNMA	$	730	$	30	$	—		$	760
Issued by FHLMC		2,522		51		—			2,573
Issued by GNMA		33,199		386		(8	)		33,577
	$	36,451	$	467	$	(8	)	$	36,910
Total Available-for-sale	$	50,297	$	689	$	(35	)	$	50,951

Held-to-maturity
Mortgage backed securities
Issued by FNMA	$	2,419	$	31	$	(10	)		2,440
Issued by FHLMC		3,388		52		—			3,440
	$	5,807	$	83	$	(10	)	$	5,880

	As of December 31, 2008
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-sale
Mortgage backed securities
Issued by FNMA	$	6,949	$	144	$	—		$	7,093
Issued by FHLMC		5,037		112		(31	)		5,118
Issued by GNMA		2,958		113		(84	)		2,987
	$	14,944	$	369	$	(115	)	$	15,198
U.S. Agency Securities
Issued by FHLB	$	3,095	$	124	$	—		$	3,219
Issued by Other Agency		2,072		1		—			2,073
	$	5,167	$	125	$	—		$	5,292
Municipal Securities
Rated AAA	$	3,506	$	55	$	(8	)	$	3,553
Rated AA		367		7		—			374
Rated A		902		6		(11	)		897
Unrated		450		—		(18	)		432
	$	5,225	$	68	$	(37	)	$	5,256
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
Issued by FNMA	$	2,705	$	92	$	—		$	2,797
Issued by FHLMC		6,122		131		—			6,253
Issued by GNMA		21,350		273		(3	)		21,620
	$	30,177	$	496	$	(3	)	$	30,670
Total Available-for-sale	$	55,513	$	1,058	$	(155	)	$	56,416

Held-to-maturity
Mortgage backed securities
Issued by FNMA	$	4,069	$	15	$	(85	)		3,999
Issued by FHLMC		6,705		—		(205	)		6,500
	$	10,774	$	15	$	(290	)	$	10,499

	As of December 31,
	2009					2008
	Balance		Yield			Balance		Yield
						(Dollars in Thousands)
Available for sale
Mortgage backed securities	$	7,681		3.81	%	$	15,198		5.23	%
U.S. Agency Securities		3,019		6.80			5,292		3.99
Municipal Securities		3,341		5.63			5,256		5.66
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation		36,910		3.61			30,670		4.63
	$	50,951		3.97	%	$	56,416		4.83	%

Held to maturity
Mortgage backed securities	$	5,807		2.50	%	$	10,774		4.02	%

The Bank does not hold any high risk collateralized mortgage obligations or structured notes as of December 31, 2009. The mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA, FNMA, or FHLMC or are collateralized by securities backed by these agencies. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures relating to the maturities and fair values of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Loans

Loans, net, decreased by $88,812,000, or 25.8% as of December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period prior year. During the fiscal year 2009, the Bank sold $63.5 million of loans. Of that amount, approximately $19.8 million loans were sold at par during the third quarter 2009 and $37.4 million in principal amount of certain nonperforming loans were sold in the fourth quarter 2009.

The following table sets forth components of total net loans outstanding in each category at the dates indicated:

	At December 31,
	2009(*)			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)

One-to-four family residential	$	32,288		$	33,695		$	22,098		$	16,742		$	16,995
Multifamily residential		122,891			171,136			123,077			120,287			121,176
Commercial real estate		281,409			322,861			246,258			220,049			183,288
Land		9,766			10,905			9,369			8,316			9,777
Construction real estate		33,667			31,077			28,988			33,188			26,003
Consumer loans		1,556			2,111			2,045			2,545			2,785
Commercial, non real estate		35,716			18,913			36,250			23,553			24,725
Total gross loans		517,293			590,698			468,085			424,680			384,749
Net deferred loan costs		1,442			1,845			1,529			1,327			1,907
Total loans receivable, net of deferred loan costs		518,735			592,543			469,614			426,007			386,656
Allowance for loan losses		(23,098	)		(8,093	)		(4,915	)		(4,672	)		(4,232	)
Loans receivable, net	$	495,637		$	584,450		$	464,699		$	421,335		$	382,424

(*) Includes $59,985 of loans classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, that have a carrying value equal to their estimated net selling value.

Commercial real estate and Multifamily loans declined $41,452,000, or 12.8% and $48,245,000, 28.2%, respectively, from December 31, 2009 to the same period prior year. The decline was primarily due to the partial charge-offs of loans included in the planned sale of $50 million of performing and $25 million of substandard-performing and nonperforming commercial real estate and multifamily loans in the first quarter of 2010, the sale of $19.8 million of loans sold in the third quarter of 2009, and the sale of approximately $37.4 million in principal amount of certain multifamily nonperforming loans in November 2009.

Outstanding loan commitments at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 primarily consisted of undisbursed construction loans, lines of credit, and commitments to originate commercial real estate and multifamily loans. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the hospitality industry was identified as a concentration of credit as it represented 15.5% and 13.4%, respectively, of the loan portfolio. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately 94.0% and 90.7%, respectively, of the Bank’s loans were secured by various types of commercial or residential real estate.

The substantial decline in the economy in general and the decline in residential and commercial real estate values in the Company’s primary market area in particular have had an adverse impact on the collectability of certain of these loans and have required increases in the provision for loan losses. The Bank monitors the effects of current and expected market conditions as well as other factors on the collectability of real estate loans. Management believes that the adverse impact on the collectability of certain of these loans will continue into 2010, as the combined effects of declining commercial real estate values and challenging economic conditions will place continued stress on the Bank’s small business and commercial real estate borrowers.

As of December 31, 2009, there was $80,281,000 in hospitality loans representing 15.5% of the loan portfolio. Of this amount $32,117,000 are loans originated through the SBA 504 program with an average original loan-to-value ratio of 52%, $37,026,000 are commercial real estate loans not originated through the SBA 504 program, $6,396,000 are the disbursed balance of construction loans, and $4,742,000 are commercial unsecured loans. Hospitality loans have been identified as a higher risk concentration based on the impact of the economic conditions and supported by the rise in delinquencies and requests for payment deferments. All loans have been assigned to a Portfolio Manager for enhanced monitoring. Updated financial data has been requested from borrowers. The allowance for loan losses may be increased in the coming quarters if there is further deterioration in the credit quality of the hospitality loan portfolio.

Real estate construction loans are primarily short term loans to finance the construction of commercial and single family residential property. Other real estate loans consist primarily of loans made based on the property and/or the borrower’s individual and business cash flows. Maturities on real estate loans other than construction loans are generally restricted to fifteen years (on an amortization of thirty years with a balloon payment due in fifteen years). Any loans extended for greater than five years generally have re-pricing provisions that adjust the interest rate at specified times prior to maturity.

Commercial and industrial loans and lines of credit are made for the purpose of providing working capital, covering fluctuations in cash flows, financing the purchase of equipment, or for other business purposes. Such loans and lines of credit include loans with maturities ranging from one to five years.

Consumer loans and lines of credit are made for the purpose of financing various types of consumer goods and other personal purposes. Consumer loans and lines of credits generally provide for the monthly payment of principal and interest or interest only payments with periodic principal payments.

In extending credit and commitments to borrowers, the Bank generally requires collateral and/or guarantees as security. The repayment of such loans is expected to come from cash flow or from the income or assets of the borrowers. The Bank’s requirement for collateral and/or guarantees is determined on a case-by-case basis in connection with cash on deposits with the Bank, management’s evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, owner/user properties, income-producing properties, residences and other real property. The Bank protects its collateral interests by perfecting its security interest in business assets, obtaining deeds of trust, or outright possession among other means.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the loan portfolio was primarily comprised of floating and hybrid fixed/ adjustable-rate loans. Hybrid fixed/adjustable-rate loans have an initial fixed-rate period, typically three to five years, after which the loan rate adjusts based on a specified frequency, repricing index, and margin, subject to lifetime floor and cap rates. The following table sets forth the percentages of the floating and hybrid/fixed adjustable-rate loans repricing in selected future periods as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Reprice within one year		49.1	%		40.9	%
Reprice within one to two years		10.0	%		9.5	%
Reprice within two to three years		13.3	%		10.7	%
Reprice within three to four years		14.1	%		12.0	%
Reprice within four to five years		5.3	%		19.1	%
Reprice after five years		8.2	%		7.8	%
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of loans as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. At those dates, the Bank had no loans with maturities greater than thirty years. In addition, the table shows the distribution of such loans between those loans with predetermined (fixed) interest rates and those with adjustable (floating) interest rates. Adjustable interest rates generally fluctuate with changes in the various pricing indices, primarily the six-month constant maturity treasury index, six month LIBOR, and Prime Rate.

	At December 31, 2009
	Maturing		Maturing		Maturing
	Within		One to		After
	One Year		Five Years		Five Years		Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family residential	$	—	$	1,795	$	30,493	$	32,288
Multifamily residential		2,110		2,202		118,579		122,891
Commercial real estate		22,156		19,642		239,611		281,409
Land		2,373		6,565		828		9,766
Construction real estate		21,941		11,726		—		33,667
Consumer loans		1,097		32		427		1,556
Commercial, non real estate		14,041		12,262		9,413		35,716
Total	$	63,718	$	54,224	$	399,351	$	517,293

Loans with predetermined interest rates	$	4,855	$	9,590	$	3,613	$	18,058
Loans with floating or adjustable interest rates		58,863		44,634		395,738		499,235
	$	63,718	$	54,224	$	399,351	$	517,293

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for potential losses in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made by charges to expense in the form of a provision for loan losses. All loans that are judged to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance while any recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management has instituted loan policies which include using grading standards and criteria similar to those employed by bank regulatory agencies to adequately evaluate and assess the analysis of risk factors associated with its loan portfolio and to enable management to assess such risk factors prior to granting new loans and to assess the sufficiency of the allowance. Actual loan losses could differ materially from management’s estimate if actual loss factors and conditions differ significantly from the assumptions utilized.

Management conducts an evaluation of the loan portfolio quarterly. This evaluation is an assessment of a number of factors including the results of the internal loan review, external loan review by outside consultants from time to time, any regulatory examination, loan loss experience, estimated potential loss exposure on each credit, concentrations of credit, value of collateral, and any known impairment in the borrower’s ability to repay and present economic conditions as the Bank is obtaining updated appraisals, current financial statements, current credit reports, and verifying current net worth and liquidity positions of selected borrowers. Additionally, the Bank uses a quantitative analysis to stress test the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio under various default assumptions and incorporate current industry probabilities of default. Loans receiving lesser grades fall under the “classified” category, which includes all nonperforming and potential problem loans, and receive an elevated level of attention to ensure collection. Foreclosed or repossessed loan collateral, OREO, is recorded at the lower of cost or appraised value less estimated costs to hold and sell.

There are, however, limitations to any credit risk grading process. The volume of loans and the frequency of receipt of updated appraisals and financials makes it impractical to re-grade every loan every quarter. Therefore, it is possible that some currently performing loans not recently graded will not be as strong as their last grading and an insufficient portion of the allowance will have been allocated to them. Grading and loan review often must be done without knowing whether all relevant facts are at hand. Troubled borrowers may deliberately or inadvertently omit information from reports or conversations with lending officers regarding their financial condition and the diminished strength of repayment sources.

Each quarter the Bank reviews the allowance and makes additional transfers to the allowance as needed. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses was 5.03% and 1.37%, respectively, of loans held-for-investment. No assurance can be given that the increase in the allowance is adequate to reflect the composition of the loan portfolio, non-accrual loans and the overall economic downturn, which may adversely affect small businesses and borrowers in the Bank’s market area as of December 31, 2009. The Bank is working diligently with all borrowers to proactively identify and address difficulties as they arise. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, charge-offs of loans totaled $35,845,000 and $37,000, respectively, and recoveries on previously charged-off loans totaled $4,000 and $25,000, respectively. There were forty-nine nonperforming loans and six other real estate owned properties as of December 31, 2009 and eighteen nonperforming loans and one foreclosed property that was transferred to other real estate owned as of December 31, 2008.

As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 53.2% and 48.3%, respectively. The allowance is maintained by categories of the loan portfolio based on loan type and loan rating; however, the entire allowance is available to cover actual loan losses. While management uses available information to recognize probable losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions and other matters. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance. Such agencies may require the Bank to provide additions to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. No assurance can be given that further economic difficulties or other circumstances which would adversely affect the borrowers and their ability to repay outstanding loans will not occur. These losses would be reflected in increased losses in the loan portfolio, which losses could possibly exceed the amount then reserved for loan losses.

The following table provides the allocation of allowance for loan losses by major loan category as of December 31, 2009:

	As of December 31, 2009
Balance at End of Period Applicable to:	Allowance for Losses on Loans		Percent of Allowance in each category to total Allowance
	(Dollars In Thousands)
One-to-four family residential	$	907		3.9	%

Multifamily residential		4,146		17.9	%

Commercial real estate		9,680		42.0	%

Land		631		2.7	%

Construction real estate		6,519		28.3	%

Consumer loans		3		0.0	%

Commercial, non real estate		1,212		5.2	%
	$	23,098		100.0	%

The following table summarizes the loan loss experience, transactions in the allowance for loan losses and certain pertinent ratios for the periods indicated:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
				(Dollars In Thousands)
Gross Loans Outstanding, Period End	$	518,735		$	592,543		$	469,613		$	426,007		$	386,657
Average Amount of Loans Outstanding		583,640			541,544			439,262			415,368			371,024
Period end non-performing loans outstanding		43,358			16,758			466			—			35

Allowance for Loans Loss, Beginning of Period	$	8,094		$	4,915		$	4,671		$	4,232		$	3,600
Charge-offs
Multifamily residential		(13,890	)		—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		(21,027	)		—			—			—			—
Consumer Loans		(28	)		(37	)		(1	)		—			—
One to Four family residential		(94	)		—			—			—			—
Construction		(807	)		—			—			—			—
Total Charge-offs		(35,846	)		(37	)		(1	)		—			—
Recoveries
Consumer loans		1			25			—			—			—
Multifamily residential		3			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		—			—			—			—			—
Total Recoveries		4			25			—			—			—
Additions/(Reductions) charged to operations		50,846			3,191			245			439			632
Allowance for Loan Loss, End of Period	$	23,098		$	8,094		$	4,915		$	4,671		$	4,232
Ratio of Net Charge-offs/(Recoveries) During the Period to Average Loans Outstanding During the Period		-6.14	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Ratio of Allowance for Loan Losses to Loans at Period End		4.45	%		1.37	%		1.05	%		1.10	%		1.09	%

Nonperforming Assets

The Bank manages credit losses by enforcing administration procedures and aggressively pursuing collection efforts with troubled debtors. The Bank closely monitors the markets in which it conducts its lending operations and continues its strategy to control exposure to loans with high credit risk and to increase diversification of earning assets. Internal and external loan reviews are performed periodically using grading standards and criteria similar to those employed by bank regulatory agencies. Management has evaluated loans that it considers to carry additional risk above the normal risk of collectability, and by taking actions where possible to reduce credit risk exposure by methods that include, but are not limited to, seeking liquidation of the loan by the borrower, seeking additional tangible collateral or other repayment support, converting the property through judicial or non-judicial foreclosure proceedings, selling loans and other collection techniques.

The Bank has a process to review all nonperforming loans on a quarterly basis. The Bank considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due (principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment on specific loans as of December 31, 2009 was $43,359,000 as compared to $16,758,000 as of December 31, 2008. The evaluation of impaired loans will continue in the coming quarters as the Bank receives updated appraisals, financial information, and economic trends relevant to individual non-accrual loans. The Bank’s policy is to place loans on non-accrual status when, for any reason, principal or interest is past due for ninety days or more unless they are both well secured and in the process of collection or if the Bank determines that there is little to no chance of being paid current by the borrower. In addition, some loans secured by real estate with temporarily impaired values and commercial loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties are placed on nonaccrual status even though the borrowers continue to repay the loans as scheduled. Such loans are classified by Management as “performing nonaccrual” and are included in total nonaccrual loans. Any interest accrued, but unpaid, is reversed against current income. Interest received on non-accrual loans is applied to principal until the loan has been repaid in full, at which time the interest received is credited to income. Nonaccrual loans are reinstated to accrual status when improvements in credit quality eliminate the doubt as to the full collectability of both interest and principal.

When appropriate or necessary to protect the Bank’s interests, real estate taken as collateral on a loan may be taken by the Company through foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Real property acquired in this manner is known as OREO. OREO is carried on the books as an asset at fair value less estimated costs to sell. OREO represents an additional category of “nonperforming assets.” The Company had six OREO’s as of December 31, 2009 for $3,587,000 and one OREO for $417,000 as of December 31, 2008.

The following table provides information with respect to the components of the nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

	Balances as of December 31,
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-accrual loans
Construction real estate	$	10,913		$	2,411		$	—		$	—		$	—
Multifamily residential		7,355			1,464			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			35
Commercial real estate		22,924			12,883			466			—			—
One-to-four family residential		679			—			—			—			—
Land		1,488			—			—			—			—
	$	43,359		$	16,758		$	466		$	—		$	35

Restructured Loans	$	—			—			—			—			—

Other real estate owned	$	3,587			417			—			—			—

Nonperforming assets as a percent of total loans		10.23	%		2.90	%		0.10	%		0.00	%		0.01	%
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets		7.46	%		2.44	%		0.08	%		0.00	%		0.01	%
Allowance for Loan Losses	$	23,098		$	8,093		$	4,915		$	4,671		$	4,232
Allowance for Loan Losses/ loans receivable outstanding at period end		5.03	%		1.37	%		1.05	%		1.10	%		1.09	%

The Company had forty-nine nonperforming loans with principal amounts totaling $43,359,000 and six OREO’s with carrying amounts totaling $3,587,000 for a total of $46,946,000 of principal amounts of nonperforming assets at December 31, 2009. There are eleven nonperforming loans which exceed $1.5 million each and have a total carrying value of $31,998,000 as follows:

	●	A $2,167,000 land/construction loan in Carmel Valley, CA secured by a first deed of trust on property zoned for hospitality with a 50% participation with another lender. This loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 25%.
	●	A $2,110,000 loan secured by a first deed of trust on a multifamily residential property located in Richmond, CA and cross-collateralization by a second deed of trust on commercial real estate. The combined original loan-to-value on the loan is 66%.
	●	A $3,979,000 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in San Francisco, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 65%.
	●	A $2,081,000 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in San Rafael, CA. The loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 75%.
	●	A $1,966,000 commercial line of credit secured by real estate located in Petaluma, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 38%.
	●	A $1,739,000 SBA 504 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in Sacramento, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 48%.
	●	A $1,578,000 construction loan secured by real estate located in Larkspur, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value ratio of 50%.

	●	A $7,168,000 construction loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in Healdsburg, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value of 69%.
	●	A $3,440,000 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in Mendocino, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value of 52.6%.
	●	A $2,530,000 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in Healdsburg, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value of 64%.
	●	A $3,240,000 commercial real estate loan secured by a first deed of trust on property located in Napa, CA. This loan had an original loan-to-value of 49%.

The remaining nonperforming loans total $11,361,000, are under $1.5 million each and are from a general cross-section of the loan portfolio.

The Bank has six OREO assets with a carrying value of $3,587,000 as of December 31, 2009. Included in the OREO assets is the following asset with a carrying value of $1,900,000 that exceeds $1.5 million.

●

A commercial bridge loan with a carrying value of $1,900,000 secured by a luxury single family home under construction in Scottsdale, Arizona. A charge-off of $1,400,000 was recorded against the original loan principal balance to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated net realizable value.

The remaining five foreclosed properties have a carrying value under $1.5 million each.

As of December 31, 2009, there were no restructured loans. The gross interest income that would have been recorded had non-accrual loans been current totaled $2,920,561 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

As of December 31, 2008, there were eighteen loans with principal amounts totaling $16,758,000 which were on non-accrual status as follows. Three of the non-accruals were multifamily loans totaling $1,464,000, two non-accruals were construction real estate totaling $2,411,000 and thirteen of the non-accruals were commercial real estate loans totaling $12,883,000.

Included in these totals are as follows:

	●	The $3,300,000 commercial bridge loan secured by real estate which is located in Scottsdale, AZ and was transferred to OREO in February 2009. The October 2008 appraised value of this loan was $4.3 million and it is one of three out-of-state loans for the Bank.

	●	The $5,400,000 commercial bridge loan secured by real estate and is located in San Francisco, CA and was originated in April 2007. It is zoned for residential condominium development and the original loan-to-value was at 64%. In August 2009, $3,434,682 of the loan balance was charged-off upon foreclosure of the loan and the balance of $1,965,318 was reverted to OREO. The OREO sold on 12/31/2009 for $1,630,000.

	●	The $2,167,000 construction loan is located in Carmel Valley, CA and is zoned for hospitality with a 50% participation with another lender and had an original loan-to-value ratio of 25%.

These three non-accrual loans represented 63% of the total nonperforming assets. The Bank also had one OREO property acquired via a foreclosed loan located in the Bank’s primary market. This property was sold on March 31, 2009 for approximately $485,000, and the Bank was able to record a gain on the sale of this property of approximately $62,000. The gross interest income that would have been recorded had non-accrual loans been current totaled $497,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, there were no restructured loans.

The following table provides information with respect to delinquent but still accruing loans at the dates indicated.

	Balances as of December 31,
	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
			(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans delinquent 30-89 days and accruing
Commercial real estate	$	7,477	$	6,566	$	139	$	1,137	$	308
Consumer loans		1		26		—		—		—
Multifamily		3,144		6,237		414		268		—
Land and Construction		880		—		—		531		534
Commercial, non real estate		23		—		—		—		—
	$	11,525	$	12,829	$	553	$	1,936	$	842
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Total nonperforming assets could increase in the future if the national and local economies weaken further which may adversely affect the small businesses in the market area. The performance of any individual loan can be impacted by external factors such as the economy and interest rate environment, or factors particular to the borrower.

Refer to Note 4 and 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Business section of this Annual Report for additional information concerning loans.

Deposits

The principal source of deposits for the Bank are non-interest and interest-bearing transaction accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposits from the Bank’s market areas and non-brokered wholesale deposits from financial institutions across the U.S.. At December 31, 2009, total deposits were $487,217,000, representing an increase of $26,916,000, or 5.8% over the December 31, 2008 balance. The Bank’s deposit growth plan for fiscal year 2010 and beyond is to concentrate its efforts on increasing noninterest-bearing checking, money market and retail certificate of deposit accounts. As of December 31, 2009, the noninterest-bearing checking accounts increased $10,102,000, or 30.4% as compared to December 31, 2008. The Bank had wholesale deposits through deposit brokers of $92.0 million (18.9% of deposits) and $84.8 million (18.5% of deposits) and through non-brokered wholesale sources of $121.7 million (25.0% of deposits) and $89.3 million (19.4% of deposits) as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

On April 30, 2009, the Bank renewed a $15.0 million time deposit from the State of California through the State Treasurer. This is included in non-brokered wholesale certificates of deposits. The time deposit bears interest at the rate of 0.19% and matured on July 30, 2009 and was not renewed.

The following table summarizes the distribution of deposits and the period ending rates paid for the periods indicated:

	December 31, 2009								December 31, 2008
						Weighted								Weighted
			Deposit			Average					Deposit			Average
	Balance		Mix			Rate			Balance		Mix			Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	43,362		8.9	%		0.00	%	$	33,260		7.2	%		0.00	%
Interest-bearing checking deposits		7,172		1.5	%		0.26	%		9,736		2.1	%		0.39	%
Money Market and savings deposits		128,633		26.4	%		1.17	%		156,479		34.1	%		1.79	%
Certificates of deposit		308,050		63.2	%		2.40	%		260,826		56.6	%		2.80	%
Total deposits	$	487,217		100.0	%		1.83	%	$	460,301		100.0	%		2.20	%

The following table summarizes the distribution and original source of certificates of deposit for the periods indicated:

	December 31, 2009								December 31, 2008
						Weighted								Weighted
			Deposit			Average					Deposit			Average
	Balance		Mix			Rate			Balance		Mix			Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Retail certificates of deposit	$	109,003		35.4	%		2.08	%	$	86,702		33.2	%		3.04	%
Brokered certificates of deposit		77,383		25.1	%		3.49	%		84,784		32.5	%		3.29	%
Non-brokered wholesale certificates of deposit		121,664		39.5	%		1.99	%		89,340		34.3	%		2.11	%
Total time deposits	$	308,050		100.0	%		2.40	%	$	260,826		100.0	%		2.80	%

The following schedule shows the maturity of the time deposits as of December 31, 2009:

	$100,000 or more								Less than $100,000
						Weighted								Weighted
			Deposit			Average					Deposit			Average
	Amount		Mix			Rate			Amount		Mix			Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Three months or less	$	9,564		11.5	%		2.01	%	$	44,323		19.7	%		1.61	%
Over 3 through 6 months		12,850		15.4	%		1.95	%		40,019		17.8	%		2.07	%
Over 6 through 12 months		36,227		43.5	%		2.25	%		59,097		26.3	%		2.41	%
Over 12 months through 2 years		20,848		25.0	%		2.76	%		63,199		28.1	%		2.84	%
Over 2 through 3 years		1,555		1.9	%		3.20	%		16,023		7.1	%		3.68	%
Over 3 through 4 years		1,005		1.2	%		4.21	%		1,260		0.6	%		3.56	%
Over 4 through 5 years		1,312		1.6	%		3.07	%		768		0.3	%		3.08	%
Total	$	83,361		100.0	%		2.36	%	$	224,689		100.0	%		2.41	%

Contractual Obligations

The Company has entered into non-cancelable contracts for leased premises and other agreements. The Company has no capital leases. The following table summarizes the significant contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009.

Contractual Obligations at December 31,	1 year		2-3 years		4-5 years		> 5 years		Total

Operating leases	$	821,948	$	1,447,708	$	725,870	$	371,571	$	3,367,097
Borrowings		44,090,000		61,995,000		13,000,000		—		119,085,000
Debt		—		500,000		—		19,089,000		19,589,000
	$	44,911,948	$	63,942,708	$	13,725,870	$	19,460,571	$	142,041,097

Borrowed Funds

The Bank has obtained advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 amounting to $119.1 million and $183.1 million, respectively, a 35.0% decrease. FHLB borrowings, which are used to manage interest rate risk in the loan and investment portfolios, mature approximately evenly on a monthly basis. Deposits generated through the business banking efforts, through consumers in the retail branches and the proceeds from loan sales totaling $63.5 million in fiscal year 2009 were used to partially pay down FHLB borrowings in 2009. This trend is expected to continue through 2010.

As of December 31, 2009, unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB was $35.2 million under a formula based on the lesser of the Bank’s overall credit limit with the FHLB or eligible collateral. As of December 31, 2009, assets pledged as collateral to the FHLB consisted of $356.1 million of the loan portfolio and approximately $5.8 million of the investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2008, unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB was $94.7 million. Assets pledged as collateral to the FHLB consisted of $476.6 million of the loan portfolio and $22.1 million of the investment securities portfolio as of December 31, 2008. Total interest expense on FHLB borrowings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $6,527,000 and $7,028,000, respectively, a decrease of $501,000, or 7.1%.

Included in the FHLB borrowings of $119.1million, as of December 31, 2009, the Company has borrowings outstanding of $74.1 million with FHLB for Advances for the Community Enterprise (“ACE”) program. ACE provides funds for projects and activities that result in the creation or retention of jobs or provides services or other benefits for low-and moderate-income people and communities. ACE funds may be used to support community lending and economic development, including small business, community facilities, and public works projects. An advantage to using this program is that the interest rates are slightly lower than rates on regular FHLB advances. The maximum amount of advances that a bank may borrow under the ACE program depends on a bank’s total assets as of the previous year end. For the Bank, the maximum amount of advances that can be borrowed is 5% of total assets as of previous year end.

During 2009, the Bank repaid $31.0 million of FHLB advances prior to their scheduled maturity. As part of the Bank’s strategy to downsize the balance sheet, loans and investments were sold and the proceeds were used to pay down brokered deposits and FHLB advances. The Bank incurred prepayment fees of $441,000 to extinguish these advances prior to their scheduled maturity.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our FHLB advances at or for the dates indicated:

	At December 31, 2009					At December 31, 2008
			Weighted					Weighted
			Average					Average
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Three months or less	$	10,090		2.45	%	$	8,000		3.76	%
Over 3 through 6 months		8,000		4.35	%		12,000		4.42	%
Over 6 through 12 months		26,000		4.04	%		30,000		4.36	%
Over 12 months through 2 years		45,995		3.87	%		60,090		4.31	%
Over 2 through 3 years		16,000		3.74	%		43,995		4.00	%
Over 3 through 4 years		13,000		3.74	%		16,000		3.74	%
Over 4 through 5 years		—		—			13,000		3.74	%
Total	$	119,085		3.79	%	$	183,085		4.14	%

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB advances:
Average balance outstanding	$	160,126		$	167,854		$	103,088
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the period		181,085			183,085			146,508
Balance outstanding at end of period		119,085			183,085			146,508
Average interest rate during the period		4.08	%		4.19	%		4.43	%
Average interest rate at end of period		3.79	%		4.14	%		4.38	%

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company issued a 30-year, $3,093,000 variable rate junior subordinated debenture. The security matures on September 1, 2036, but is callable after September 1, 2011. The interest rate on the debenture is paid quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 175 basis points. As of December 31, 2009, the interest rate was 2.01%. The debenture is subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of the Company.

During the third quarter of 2007, the Company issued a 30-year, $10,310,000 variable rate junior subordinated debenture. The security matures on December 1, 2037, but is callable on December 1, 2012. The interest rate on the debenture is paid quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 144 basis points. As of December 31, 2009, the interest rate was 1.70%. The debenture is subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of the Company.

In light of the continuing challenging economic conditions, on July 9, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors elected, pursuant to the terms of the respective indentures, to defer distributions on its $13.4 million of outstanding junior subordinated debentures. Total interest expense attributable to the junior subordinated debentures during 2009 versus the same period for 2008 was $724,000 and $636,000, respectively.

On March 28, 2008, the Company obtained a $5 million credit facility from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank. The credit facility bears a floating interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR rate and will mature on March 28, 2018. The interest rate resets quarterly. The Company paid a loan fee of 0.50% of the loan amount. An initial disbursement of $3 million was received on March 31, 2008. The Company received the $2 million in additional disbursements in the second quarter of 2008. The facility is a non-revolving line of credit for the first twelve months with quarterly interest only payments. After the first twelve months the facility converts to a nine year amortizing loan with quarterly principal and interest payments. The facility cannot be paid down below $3 million during the first twelve months and can be prepaid without penalty after the first twelve months. As of December 31, 2009, the floating interest rate on the $5 million credit facility that the Company obtained on March 28, 2008 was equal to three-month LIBOR plus 5.25%, which includes a default rate premium of 5.00% added to the base margin over LIBOR due the Company’s default on certain loan covenants as explained further below.

On June 26, 2008, the Company obtained a $1 million credit facility from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank. The credit facility bears floating interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR and will mature on June 26, 2018. The interest rate resets quarterly. The Company paid a loan fee of 0.75% of the loan amount. The $1 million was disbursed on June 26, 2008. The facility is a non-revolving line of credit for the first twelve months with quarterly interest only payments. After the first twelve months the facility converts to a nine-year amortizing loan with quarterly principal and interest payments. The facility cannot be paid down below $1 million during the first twelve months and can be prepaid without penalty after the first twelve months. As of December 31, 2009, the floating interest rate on the $1 million credit facility was equal to three-month LIBOR plus 6.00%, which includes a default rate premium of 5.00% added to the base margin over the LIBOR due to the Company’s default on certain loan covenants as explained further below.

In addition, pursuant to the Amendment, the Company agreed to establish a reserve account in the amount of $775,000 on or before August 31, 2009. The Company agreed to make a principal reduction payment equal to $2,000,000 by no later than November 30, 2009. The Company also agreed that it will reduce the outstanding principal amount of the loans with a portion of proceeds in the event of certain capital raising transactions.

The Company has not yet established a Reserve Account with Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank, nor has the Company paid the $2,000,000 principal reduction payment and, accordingly, is in default under the Agreements. On September 3, 2009, the Bank received notice from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank that one or more events of default have occurred under the two business loan agreements dated March 28, 2008 and as of June 26, 2008. The Holding Company has accrued but did not make the quarterly principal and interest payment due to Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank at the end of December 2009.

Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank informed the Company that it may, in its discretion, choose to delay exercise of the Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank remedies or to exercise fewer than all of the remedies that are available to it, and that any such action or inaction on Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank part does not constitute a waiver of any of the Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank’s rights under law or under the loan documents. The Agreements are not obligations of the Bank. However, nonpayment of the Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank obligation by the Company has resulted in a default by the Bank in its borrowing agreement with the FHLB under a Cross-Default provision in that agreement. FHLB may, at its discretion, choose to delay FHLB’s remedies or to exercise fewer than all of the remedies that are available to it, and that any such action or inaction on FHLB’s part does not constitute a waiver of any of the FHLB’s rights under law or under the loan document.

Total interest expense attributable to the long-term debt for 2009 and 2008 was $288,000 and $213,000, respectively.

The Company is dependent upon the payment of cash dividends from its subsidiary, the Bank, to service its commitments. As a result of the Order and Directive described in this report, the Bank is unable to declare and pay dividends to the Company. The Company is pursuing other measures to enhance liquidity in order for it to be able to service its commitments.

On September 28, 2009, the Company and a member of the Board of Directors executed an agreement whereby the Company received $500,000 in exchange for an unsecured promissory note that accrues interest at 0.75% per annum over its three year term and a warrant to purchase 12,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share over its five year term.

Capital Resources

The Company’s shareholders’ equity decreased $37.6 million to $(0.2) million as of December 31, 2009, from $37.4 million at December 31, 2008, reflecting the net loss including the $11.2 million valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets and the loan loss provisions recorded for loans sold in the fourth quarter of 2009 and for loans to be sold in the first quarter of 2010.

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking regulatory agencies. Under the capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and the Bank’s prompt corrective action classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Bank regulatory authorities have the authority to bring enforcement actions against banks and bank holding companies for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule or regulation, any condition imposed in writing by the appropriate bank regulatory agency or any written agreement with the authority.

As discussed in this Report in “Business – Regulatory Action,” on September 14, 2009, the Bank entered into the Consent agreeing to the issuance of the Order with the FDIC and CDFI. Among other things, the Order requires the Bank to:

●	Present a written capital plan to the FDIC and the Department within 60 days of the Order by which the Bank would achieve and thereafter maintain a Tier I Capital Ratio of not less than 9% and a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of not less than 12% by December 31, 2009. The capital plan must include a contingency plan in the event that the Bank has not adequately complied with the capital requirements. The contingency plan must include provisions for the sale or merger of the Bank; and,

●	Not pay cash dividends to the Company without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the CDFI.

Failure to meet the required minimum capital requirements pursuant to the capital adequacy guidelines or the Order could initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company’s business. These actions could include, among others, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, the issuance of additional directives to increase capital or enter into a strategic transaction, whether by merger or otherwise, with a third party, the appointment of a conservator or receiver, the termination of insurance of deposits, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders.

The Company presented a written capital plan to the FDIC on March 16, 2010 and to the CDFI on March 12, 2010.

Furthermore, as discussed in this Report in “Business-Regulatory Action,” on February 19, 2010, the Bank received the Directive from the FDIC. Among other things, the Directive requires the Bank to:

●

Within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that the Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. While the Company has not yet raised capital and no assurance can be given that it will be successful in its efforts to recapitalize the Bank, the Company has been, with the assistance of its investment banking firm, actively engaged in seeking additional capital from various sources.

Failure to meet the above minimum requirements pursuant to the Order or Directive, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company’s business which could include the appointment of a conservator or receiver of the Bank.

The Company and the Bank routinely project their capital levels by forecasting earnings, asset credit quality, securities valuation, asset and liability volumes and mix, rates on new assets and liabilities, shareholder dividends (if any), share repurchase activity (if any) and other factors. Capital ratios are reviewed by Management and the Board of Directors on a regular basis to assess whether capital exceeds the prescribed regulatory minimums and is adequate to meet the Company and the Bank’s anticipated future needs.

As of December 31, 2009, the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 4.9%, which did not meet the 10.00% level specified in the definition of “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio of 4.9% is also below the 12.00% minimum the FDIC requires the Bank to have achieved by December 31, 2009 pursuant to the Order. The Tier I capital ratio of 2.7% is below the 5.00% capital ratio required to be classified as “well capitalized” and below the 9.00% level for Tier I capital that the Bank is required to achieve by December 31, 2009 pursuant to the Order and also below the 3.00% minimum ratio to qualify as under-capitalized. Since the Bank is no longer deemed to be well capitalized, it must comply with interest rate limitations on the solicitation of retail and wholesale deposits and cannot accept brokered deposits.

The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio as of December 31, 2009 was (0.1)%, which did not meet the 10.00% level specified in the definition of “well capitalized” under the regulatory capital framework. The Company’s consolidated net loss of $37.6 million, primarily attributable to the large loan loss provisions and the $11.2 million valuation reserve for unrealizable deferred tax assets, has depleted consolidated capital for the Company.

In light of the capital requirements specified in the Order and the Directive, as presented below, the Bank and the Company have developed a formal plan to improve their respective capital positions. Potential actions and strategies to meet the capital requirements include actively managing assets and liabilities to a smaller base, controlling operating expenses, when possible, and retaining earnings, if any, as an internal source of capital. The Company has also suspended making quarterly dividends on its common stock and has deferred distributions on the Company’s $13.4 million of outstanding trust preferred securities to preserve the Company’s core capital and liquidity positions. The Company does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock until its capital position improves significantly. In addition, the Board of Directors is also evaluating other alternative strategies and has engaged a financial advisor to assist with raising capital. While the Bank and Company have developed a formal plan and implementing strategies designed to achieve compliance with the capital requirements specified in the Order and Directive, there is no guarantee that the plan and strategies will be successful or sufficient. If the Bank or Company does not achieve compliance with its capital requirements, we may be subject to additional regulatory actions in the future as described above.

The Bank’s and the Company’s capital adequacy ratios are presented in the following table. The capital ratios have been computed in accordance with regulatory accounting guidelines. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was not a bank holding company and, therefore, not subject to the FRB’s capital requirements, but was a bank holding company as of December 31, 2009.

Capital Ratios for the Bank:

									To Be Well
									Capitalized Under
					For Capital				Prompt Corrective
	Actual Capital				Adequacy Purposes				Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)

As of December 31, 2009:
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	25,146	4.9	%	$	41,308	8.0	%	$	51,634	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		18,482	3.6	%		20,650	4.0	%		30,975	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		18,482	2.7	%		27,080	4.0	%		33,850	5.0	%

As of December 31, 2008:

Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	62,968	10.5	%	$	48,159	8.0	%	$	60,199	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		55,423	9.2	%		24,229	4.0	%		36,343	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		55,423	8.1	%		27,471	4.0	%		34,339	5.0	%

Capital Ratios for the Company:

						For Capital
	Actual Capital					Adequacy Purposes
	Amount			Ratio		Amount		Ratio

As of December 31, 2009:

Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	(566	)	-0.1	%	$	41,348	8.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		(566	)	-0.1	%	$	20,673	4.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		(566	)	-0.1	%	$	27,062	4.0	%

Liquidity and Liability Management

Liquidity management for banks requires that funds always be available to pay anticipated deposit withdrawals and maturing financial obligations such as certificates of deposit promptly and fully in accordance with their terms and to fund new loans. Liquidity management also considers the potential for unanticipated deposit withdrawals, unanticipated loan demand and reductions in borrowing capacities. Liability management for banks involves evaluation and selection of the type, maturities, amounts, rates and availability associated with deposits, borrowings and other liabilities that a bank could undertake. Liability management is integral to the liquidity management process.

The Bank’s major sources of funds include retail and wholesale deposit inflows, payments and maturities of loans, sale of loans, investment security sales, investment security maturities and pay-downs, FHLB advances, borrowings under Federal funds lines, other borrowings and the acquisition of additional deposit liabilities. The Bank’s primary use of funds are for origination of loans, the purchase of investment securities, to redeem maturing CD’s, checking and savings deposit withdrawals, repayment of borrowings, payment of operating expenses and dividends to common shareholders and Company obligations (when authorized).

One method many banks can utilize for acquiring additional liquidity is through the acceptance of “brokered deposits” (defined to include not only deposits received through deposit brokers, but also deposits bearing interest in excess of 75 basis points over market rates), typically attracting large certificates of deposit at relatively high interest rates. A limitation of the Order and Directive previously discussed is that the Bank may not accept, renew or rollover any brokered deposits without obtaining a waiver from the FDIC. The Order also requires the Bank to implement a plan for reducing the Bank’s reliance on brokered deposits. The Bank has developed and is implementing the required plan; brokered deposits declined to $91,960,000 at December 31, 2009, from $111,486,000 at September 30, 2009. Additionally, the Order requires the Bank to develop and implement a written liquidity funds management policy to guide the Bank’s liquidity and liability management. The liquidity funds management policy has been developed and, among other things, establishes lower limits on brokered deposits and borrowed funds than the Bank has utilized in the past.

To meet liquidity needs, the Bank maintains a portion of funds in cash deposits in other banks, Federal funds sold, and investment securities. As of December 31, 2009, liquid assets were comprised of $29,189,000 in cash and cash equivalents, $179,000 in interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and $50,951,000 in available-for-sale securities. Those liquid assets equaled 12.8% of total assets at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, liquid assets were comprised of $558,000 in interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, $15,920,000 in cash and equivalents, and $56,416,000 in available-for-sale securities. Those liquid assets equaled 10.4% of total assets at December 31, 2008.

In addition to liquid assets, liquidity can be enhanced, if necessary, through short or long term borrowings. The Bank considers Federal funds lines, FHLB advances and other borrowings to be important sources of funding in the future. While management expects there to be adequate collateral for secured funding requirements, a decline in the Bank’s credit-worthiness would adversely affect the Bank’s ability to borrow on an unsecured basis via Federal funds purchased and likely would adversely affect the overall amounts the Bank could borrow on a secured basis, thus impacting the Bank’s contingent access to additional liquidity. During the third quarter, two correspondent banks suspended the Bank’s unsecured Fed funds purchased lines of credit totaling $20,000,000.

The Bank is also a member of the FHLB San Francisco and has a secured credit line for advances, the total usable amount of which is dependent on the borrowing capacity of pledged loans. The total borrowing capacity for advances was $160,012,000 at December 31, 2009, of which $35,238,000 was unused. As of December 31, 2009 the Bank’s approved credit limit for mortgage loan collateral was 20% of assets and an additional credit limit of 5% of assets if secured by the Bank’s investment securities. Additionally, the FHLB required the Bank to collateralize potential prepayment fees of $5 million and required delivery of pledged loans. The Bank pledged its $5,807,000 of Held-to-Maturity investment securities to the FHLB in December 2009 to maintain available borrowing capacity.

In February 2010, the FHLB reduced the maximum term the Bank could borrow funds from the current 36 months to 15 months. Further, FHLB requires that the Bank’s new and rolling advances above 15% of assets be secured by agency securities collateral. In February 2010, the Bank pledged an additional $37,636,000 of its agency securities to the FHLB. The FHLB has the discretionary right going forward to take actions to manage the risk of its credit relationship with the Bank, which potential actions include further reducing the Bank’s overall credit limit and reducing the borrowing capacity of pledged loans.

The Bank also has a $2,747,000 secured borrowing capacity available with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s Discount Window, which was not drawn upon at December 31, 2009. The Bank pledged $3,325,000 of Available-for-Sale investment securities to the FRB in December 2009 to maintain available borrowing capacity although there were no Discount Window borrowings outstanding at that time.

As of February 28, 2010, there was $44,158,000 of the investment portfolio pledged as collateral to the FHLB and $3,325,000 of the investment portfolio pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank, thus approximately $5,958,000 of the investment portfolio is immediately available to be sold or pledged for borrowings. To the extent that the investment securities are used as collateral for outstanding borrowings these securities cannot be sold unless alternative collateral is substituted to collateralize the outstanding borrowings. The inability to sell those securities would reduce our available liquidity.

Management anticipates that cash and cash equivalents, investments, deposits in financial institutions, planned loan sales (subject to regulatory approval) and borrowing capacities from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve should provide adequate liquidity for the Bank’s operating, lending, investing, customer deposit withdrawal and maturing borrowing needs and to meet its regulatory liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future. However, pursuant to the Order management will continue to reduce brokered deposits as a percentage of total deposits for the foreseeable future and no assurance can be given that the Bank’s liquidity needs will be met. Bank management also plans to reduce FHLB advances as a percentage of total assets in the future to reduce its reliance on collateralized borrowings, which is consistent with the Bank’s objective of increasing its commercial loans and reducing concentrations in commercial real estate loans.

The Company historically has been dependent on the payment of cash dividends from the Bank as the main source of liquidity to service its commitments and pay dividends to shareholders and other obligations. As noted earlier, the Order and Directive prohibit the Bank from paying cash dividends to the Company without the prior written consent of the FDIC and/or the CDFI. The inability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, absent other sources of funds, is likely to adversely affect the liquidity of the Company and its ability to meet its payment obligations including its requirement to establish a reserve account with Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank.

In the third quarter 2009, the Company and a member of the Board of Directors executed an agreement whereby the Company received $500,000 in exchange for an unsecured promissory note that accrues interest at 0.75% per annum over its three year term and a warrant to purchase 12,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share over the warrant’s five year term.

As discussed above, the Company agreed to establish a reserve account in the amount of $775,000 on or before August 31, 2009, and to make a principal reduction payment equal to $2,000,000 by no later than November 30, 2009. Due to the lack of receipt of dividends from the Bank and lack of sufficient alternate sources of liquidity, the Company was not able to establish the reserve account or make the principal reduction payments due by November 30, 2009. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009, the Company was not in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio covenant and two negative covenants related to the amount of nonperforming assets relative to Tier 1 capital, the allowance for loan losses, gross loans and OREO balances at quarter-end.

The Company had $286,000 of cash and due from banks at December 31, 2009. The Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank has certain remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default under the loan agreements including declaring all indebtedness immediately due and payable, apply funds in the reserve account (if any) to the indebtedness and exercise any rights or remedies that may be available at law, in equity or otherwise.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid cash dividends on its common stock of $229,000 and $831,000, respectively. As of July 9, 2009, the Company has suspended declaring quarterly dividends on its common shares and the Company does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock until its capital position improves significantly and is sustained.

Market Risk Management

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The Bank’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its loan, investment, deposit and borrowing functions. The careful planning of asset and liability repricing and maturities and the matching of interest rates to correspond with this repricing and maturity matching is an integral part of the active management of an institution’s net interest margin. To the extent repricing and maturities of assets and liabilities do not match in a changing interest rate environment, net yields may be affected. Even with perfectly matched re-pricing of assets and liabilities, risks remain in the form of prepayment of assets, the effect of nonperforming assets, timing lags in adjusting certain assets and liabilities that have varying sensitivities to market interest rates and basis risk. In an overall attempt to match assets and liabilities, the Bank takes into account rates and maturities to be offered in connection with the certificates of deposit and variable rate loans. Because of differences in the amounts and timing of repricing of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities, the Bank is negatively affected by increasing interest rates. Conversely, the Bank would be positively affected in a decreasing rate environment.

The Bank has generally been able to control the exposure to changing interest rates by maintaining a large percentage of hybrid fixed/adjustable interest rate loans and some of the time certificates in relatively short maturities. The majority of the loans have periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors. The Bank has also controlled the interest rate risk exposure of loans with initial fixed rate terms by locking in longer term fixed rate liabilities, including FHLB borrowings, brokered certificates of deposit, and non-brokered wholesale certificates of deposit. It is management’s strategy to minimize the use of FHLB advances and non-brokered deposits beyond the need for interest rate risk management.

Since interest rate changes do not affect all categories of assets and liabilities equally or simultaneously, a cumulative gap analysis alone cannot be used to evaluate the interest rate sensitivity position. To supplement traditional repricing/maturity gap analysis, the Company can perform simulation modeling to estimate the potential effects of changing interest rates. The process allows the Company to explore the complex relationships within the gap over time and various interest rate environments.

The following table shows the Company’s cumulative gap analysis as of December 31, 2009:

	At December 31, 2009
	Within			Three to
	Three			Twelve			One to			Over
	Months			Months			Five Years			Five Years			Total
Interest Earning Assets	(Dollars in Thousands)
Securities	$	1,256		$	21,136		$	18,629		$	15,737		$	56,758
Federal Funds		15,002			—			—			—			15,002
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		—			—			179			—			179
Loans		165,024			106,588			188,691			58,432			518,735
FHLB and PCBB Stock		8,702			—			—			—			8,702
Total	$	189,984		$	127,724		$	207,499		$	74,169		$	599,376

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-bearing checking		7,172			—			—			—			7,172
Money market and savings		128,633			—			—			—			128,633
Time deposits		53,883			148,195			105,972			—			308,050
FHLB advances		10,090			34,000			74,995			—			119,085
Long term debt		5,686			—			500			—			6,186
Junior Subordinated Debentures		—			—			13,403			—			13,403
Total	$	205,464		$	182,195		$	194,870		$	—		$	582,529

Interest rate sensitivity gap	$	(15,480	)	$	(54,471	)	$	12,629		$	74,169		$	16,847
Cummulative interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of interest-earning assets		-2.6	%		-11.7	%		-9.6	%		2.8	%		2.8	%

The target cumulative one-year gap ratio is -15% to 15%. The policy limit for net earnings at risk for a +/- 200 basis points change in rates is –25%, indicating a worst case 25% decrease in earnings over a one year horizon given a 200 basis point change in interest rates. The policy limit for net interest income for a +/- 200 basis points change in rates is –15%, indicating a 15% decrease in net interest income. Management strives to maintain rate sensitive assets on its books.

Management also evaluates the uses of FHLB products including longer-term bullet advances, amortizing advances, and interest rate swaps as tools to control interest rate risk. If one of the interest rate risk measures exceeds the policy limits management adjusts product offerings and repositions assets and liabilities to bring the interest rate risk measure back within policy limits within a reasonable timeframe. As of December 31, 2009, the current one year gap ratio is 11.7%. A negative one year gap indicates that in an increasing interest rate environment, it is expected that net interest margin over the following year would decrease, and in a decreasing interest rate environment, net interest margin over the following year would increase.

The Bank believes that there are some inherent weaknesses in utilizing the cumulative gap analysis as a means of monitoring and controlling interest rate risk. Specifically, the cumulative gap analysis does not address adjustable rate loans at their floor rates that cannot reset as rates change and does not incorporate varying prepayment speeds of loans and investment securities as interest rates change. The Bank, therefore, relies more heavily on a simulation model to monitor and control interest rate risk.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Bank uses a simulation model to estimate the impact of changes in market interest rates on its net interest income and economic value of equity. Sensitivity of Net Interest Income (“NII”) and Capital to interest rate changes arises when yields on loans and investments change in a different time frame or amount from that of rates on deposits and other interest-bearing liability. To mitigate interest rate risk, the Company manages its assets and liabilities with the objective of correlating the movements of interest rates on loans and investments with those of deposits and borrowings. The asset and liability policy sets limits on the acceptable amount of change to NII and Capital in changing interest rate environments. The Bank uses simulation models to forecast NII and Capital.

Simulation of NII and Capital under various scenarios of increasing or decreasing interest rates is the primary tool used to measure interest rate risk sensitivity. Using a third party vendor that has software developed for this purpose, management is able to estimate the potential impact of changing rates. A simplified statement of condition is prepared on a quarterly basis as a starting point, using as inputs, actual loans, investments, deposits and borrowings. Other information such as rates on new investments, loans, deposits, and borrowings, as well as any significant balance sheet changes such as loan growth or loan sales may be incorporated into the analysis.

In the simulation of NII and Capital under various interest rate scenarios, the simplified statement of condition is processed against two interest rate change scenarios. Each of these scenarios assumes that the change in interest rates is immediate, parallel across all terms and interest rates remain at the new levels. The model is used to assist management in evaluating and in determining and adjusting strategies designed to reduce its exposure to these market risks, which may include, for example, changing the mix of earning assets or interest-bearing deposits.

The table below summarizes the estimated effect on the Bank’s NII and Capital due to changing interest rates as measured against the current (base case) rate scenario.

	Estimated Net Interest Income Sensitivity				Estimated Change in Economic Value of Equity
Simulated Rate Changes	12/31/2009		12/31/2008		12/31/2009		12/31/2008

+ 300 basis points	-11.05	%	-7.26	%	-20.74	%	-32.02	%
+ 200 basis points	-7.05	%	-4.83	%	-15.98	%	-20.40	%
+ 100 basis points	-3.73	%	-2.48	%	-14.72	%	-10.90	%
Unchanged	—		—		—		—
- 100 basis points	4.77	%	1.04	%	23.73	%	13.87	%
- 200 basis points	6.76	%	-2.91	%	54.32	%	28.78	%
- 300 basis points	-0.18	%	-8.17	%	79.86	%	46.88	%

As illustrated in the above table, the Bank is currently liability sensitive for a rate change from -300 basis points to +300 basis points. The implication of this is that the Bank’s earnings will increase in a falling rate environment, as there are more rate-sensitive liabilities subject to reprice downward than rate-sensitive assets; conversely, earnings would decrease in a rising rate environment. Therefore, an increase in market rates could adversely affect net interest income. In contrast, a decrease in market rates may improve net interest income.

Management utilized the sale of intermediate-term fixed rate investments and prepayments of short-term advances in October 2009, and the sale of intermediate-term hybrid rate loans and prepayment of short-term advances in November 2009 to including the planned sale in first quarter 2010 of $60 million carrying value of loans held for sale and prepayment of a comparable amount of short and intermediate term FHLB advances, to mitigate the exposure of net interest and economic value of equity to rising rates.

Management believes that all of the assumptions used in the analysis to evaluate the vulnerability of its projected net interest income and economic value of equity to changes in interest rates approximate actual experiences and considers them to be reasonable. However, the interest rate sensitivity of the Bank’s assets and liabilities and the estimated effects of changes in interest rates on the Bank’s projected net interest income and economic value of equity may vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from the projections on which they are based.

The Asset Liability Committee and/or Board of Directors meets periodically to monitor the investments, liquidity needs and oversee the asset-liability management. In between meetings of the Committee, Executive Management oversees the liquidity management.

Return on equity and assets

The following table sets forth key ratios for the periods ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

	As of December 31,
	2009		2008		2007

Net (loss)/income as a percentage of average assets	-5.39	%	0.76	%	0.81	%
Net (loss)/income as a percentage of average equity	-115.17	%	13.74	%	12.89	%
Average equity as a percentage of average assets	3.47	%	5.52	%	6.28	%
Dividends declared per share as a percentage of net (loss)/income per share	-0.61	%	17.24	%	13.45	%

The Company declared dividends of $0.045 per share in May and August 2007, respectively, and increased to $0.05 per share in November 2007. The Company declared dividends of $0.06 per share in January 2009 and November 2008, up from $0.05 per share in January 2008 and $0.055 per share in May and August 2008. On July 13, 2009, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had decided to suspend declaring quarterly dividends on its common stock.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the Company’s return on average assets and return on average equity was negative primarily due to the high loan loss provisions and large deferred tax asset valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009.

Inflation

The impact of inflation on a financial institution can differ significantly from that exerted on other companies. Banks, as financial intermediaries, have many assets and liabilities that may move in concert with inflation both as to interest rates and value. However, financial institutions are affected by inflation’s impact on non-interest expenses, such as salaries and other operating expenses.

Because of the ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities, the Bank’s profitability tends to benefit slightly in the short-term from a decreasing interest rate market and, conversely, profitability compresses in an increasing interest rate market. The management of Federal Funds rate by the Federal Reserve and other market interest rates have an impact on the Bank’s earnings such that changes in interest rates may have a corresponding impact on the ability of borrowers to repay loans with the Bank.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our interest rate swap contracts were designated and initially qualified as cash flow hedges. In the ordinary course of business, the Bank enters into off-balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit. These financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded or related fees are incurred or received.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Although the Company manages other risks, for example, credit quality and liquidity risk in the normal course of business, management considers interest rate risk to be a principal market risk. Other types of market risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk, do not arise in the normal course of the Company’s business activities. The majority of the Company’s interest rate risk arises from instruments, positions and transactions entered into for purposes other than trading. They include loans, securities available-for-sale, deposit liabilities, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Interest rate risk occurs when assets and liabilities reprice at different amounts and times as interest rates change.

The Company manages interest rate risk through its Asset Liability Committee (ALCO) and/or Board of Directors. The ALCO and/or Board of Directors monitor exposure to interest rate risk on a quarterly basis using both a traditional gap analysis and simulation analysis. Traditional gap analysis identifies short and long-term interest rate positions or exposure. Simulation analysis uses an income simulation approach to measure the estimated change in interest income and expense under rate shock conditions. The model considers the three major factors of (a) volume differences, (b) repricing differences and (c) timing in its income simulation. The model begins by entering data into appropriate repricing buckets based on the terms of the financial asset or liability, or internally supplied algorithms (or overridden by calibration). Next, each major asset and liability type is assigned a “multiplier” or beta to simulate how much that particular balance sheet category type will reprice when interest rates change. The model uses numerous asset and liability multipliers consisting of bank-specific or default multipliers. The remaining step is to simulate the timing effect of assets and liabilities by modeling a month-by-month simulation to estimate the change in interest income and expense over the next 12-month period. The results are then expressed as the change in pre-tax net interest income over a 12-month period for +1%, +2% and +3% shocks.

ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA – Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	75

Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2009 and 2008	76

Consolidated Statements of Income For the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007	77

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007	78

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007	79

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	80

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Tamalpais Bancorp and Subsidiaries

San Rafael, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tamalpais Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tamalpais Bancorp and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations, changes in its stockholders’ equity, and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $37,628,026 during the year ended December 31, 2009, and, as of that date, was rated by the FDIC as significantly undercapitalized under the regulatory capital guidelines. The Company also has a net deficit in Stockholders’ equity of $238,578. As described more fully in Notes 14, 25 and 26 to the financial statements, the Company entered into an Order to Cease and Desist (the “Order”) with the FDIC and the CDFI effective September 14, 2009. On February 25, 2010, the FDIC issued a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action (the “Directive”) The Directive provides that the Bank must 1) raise additional capital to be adequately capitalized under Regulatory Guidelines or 2) accept an offer to be combined with another insured depository institution or be acquired by a depository institution holding company. The Company has not been successful in meeting these requirements. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
Rancho Cucamonga, California
April 15, 2010

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

	2009			2008
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	14,186,881		$	15,918,826
Federal funds sold		15,001,715			838
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents		29,188,596			15,919,664
Interest-bearing time deposits in other financial institutions		178,733			558,034
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale		50,951,388			56,415,727
Held-to-maturity, at cost		5,807,181			10,773,579
Federal Home Loan Bank restricted stock, at cost		8,652,000			8,652,000
Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank stock, at cost		50,000			50,000
Loans Held-for-Sale		59,985,443			—
Loans receivable		458,750,100			592,543,181
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(23,097,897	)		(8,093,499	)
Total Loans Receivable, net		435,652,203			584,449,682
Bank premises and equipment, net		3,322,794			3,935,230
Accrued interest receivable		3,205,232			3,861,854
Other real estate owned		3,587,468			417,000
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance		11,194,845			10,828,936
Other assets		17,953,434			7,528,510
Total Assets	$	629,729,317		$	703,390,216

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	43,362,167		$	33,259,929
Interest-bearing checking deposits		7,171,790			9,735,689
Money market and saving deposits		128,632,912			156,479,340
Certificates of deposit		308,050,249			260,826,102
Total Deposits		487,217,118			460,301,060
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		119,085,000			183,085,000
Long term debt		6,185,614			6,000,000
Junior Subordinated Borrowings		13,403,000			13,403,000
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		4,077,163			3,227,823
Total Liabilities		629,967,895			666,016,883

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)		—			—

Stockholders’ Equity


Common stock, no par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 3,823,634 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively		12,027,473			12,027,473
Additonal Paid-In-Capital		1,181,825			949,488
Retained earnings		(13,774,870	)		24,082,473
Accumulated other comprehensive income		326,994			313,899
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(238,578	)		37,373,333
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	629,729,317		$	703,390,216

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	2009			2008			2007
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	37,147,921		$	40,052,345		$	36,096,493
Interest on investment securities		2,744,977			2,680,668			2,450,353
Interest on Federal funds sold		46,016			110,668			161,022
Interest on other investments		24,913			298,165			293,064
Interest on deposits in other financial institutions		20,700			30,647			40,081
Total Interest Income		39,984,527			43,172,493			39,041,013
Interest Expense
Interest expense on deposits		9,129,615			11,987,917			15,797,174
Interest expense on borrowed funds		6,526,821			7,027,569			4,561,481
Interest expense on long term debt		287,826			212,803			—
Interest expense on Junior Subordinated Debentures		723,793			635,787			1,123,231
Total Interest Expense		16,668,055			19,864,076			21,481,886
Net Interest Income Before Provision For Loan Losses		23,316,472			23,308,417			17,559,127

Provision for Loan Losses		50,845,681			3,190,957			243,956
Net Interest (Loss) Income After Provision for Loan Losses		(27,529,209	)		20,117,460			17,315,171

Noninterest Income
(Loss) Gain on sale of loans, net		(67,219	)		182,489			584,748
Gain (Loss) on sale of securities, net		783,822			(5,780	)		—
(Loss) on sale of other real estate owned, net		(474,308	)		—			—
Loan servicing		166,982			182,093			179,422
Registered Investment Advisory Services fee income		540,448			599,537			601,429
Other income		1,211,498			1,228,544			1,180,409
Total Noninterest Income		2,161,223			2,186,883			2,546,008

Noninterest Expenses
Salaries and benefits		7,790,611			8,489,707			7,335,918
Occupancy		1,420,994			1,481,267			1,468,659
Advertising		547,168			307,868			369,291
Professional		2,321,692			674,067			738,090
Data processing		665,672			610,092			469,495
Equipment and depreciation		757,526			838,561			900,072
OREO operating expenses		1,014,215			2,295			—
Other administrative		5,070,375			2,685,851			2,083,693
Total Noninterest Expense		20,169,969			15,089,708			13,365,218

(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes		(45,537,955	)		7,214,635			6,495,961
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes		(7,909,929	)		2,385,901			2,286,847
Net (Loss) Income	$	(37,628,026	)	$	4,828,734		$	4,209,114
(Loss) Earnings Per Share
Basic	$	(9.84	)	$	1.26		$	1.07

Diluted	$	(9.84	)	$	1.26		$	1.07

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

															Accumulated
							Additional								Other			Total
	Common Stock						Paid in		Comprehensive			Retained			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount			Capital		Income			Earnings			Income/(Loss)			Equity

Balance, January 1, 2007		3,960,852		$	10,384,816		$	381,993				$	20,236,571		$	(122,520	)	$	30,880,860

Stock options exercised		53,966			248,138			—		—			—			—			248,138
Redemption and retirement of stock		(196,216	)		(2,455,627	)		—		—			—			—			(2,455,627	)
Cash Dividends								—		—			(559,710	)		—			(559,710	)
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of stock dividend		(318	)					—		—			(1,162	)		—			(1,162	)
7% stock dividend declared on January 26, 2007					3,800,146								(3,800,146	)					—
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			264,531		—			—			—			264,531
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		—			—			16,689		—			—			—			16,689
Comprehensive income
Net Income for the period		—			—			—	$	4,209,114			4,209,114			—			4,209,114
Unrealized security holding gains (net of $219,803 tax expense)		—			—			—		329,704			—			329,704			329,704
Total Comprehensive Income									$	4,538,818
Balance, December 31, 2007		3,818,284		$	11,977,473		$	663,213				$	20,084,667		$	207,184		$	32,932,537

Stock options exercised		5,350			50,000			—		—			—			—			50,000
Cash Dividends								—		—			(830,928	)		—			(830,928	)
Share-based compensation expense compensation		—			—			286,275		—			—			—			286,275
Comprehensive income
Net Income for the period		—			—			—	$	4,828,734			4,828,734			—			4,828,734
Unrealized gain/(loss) on cash flow hedge (net of $176,506 tax benefit)									$	(264,759	)				$	(264,759	)		(264,759	)
Unrealized security holding gains (net of $222,831 tax expense)		—			—			—		371,474			—			371,474			371,474
Total Comprehensive Income									$	4,935,449
Balance, December 31, 2008		3,823,634		$	12,027,473		$	949,488				$	24,082,473		$	313,899		$	37,373,333

Stock options exercised		—			—			—		—			—			—			—
Cash Dividends								—		—			(229,418	)		—			(229,418	)
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			232,438		—			—			—			232,438
Comprehensive income
Net Loss for the period		—			—			—	$	(37,628,026	)		(37,628,026	)		—			(37,628,026	)
Unrealized gain/(loss) of 186,765 on cash flow hedge (net of $124,510 tax expense)									$	186,765					$	186,765			186,765
Unrealized security gain (net of $238,535 tax benefit)		—			—			—	$	296,623			—			296,623		$	296,623
Reclassification of (gains) on sale of securities (net of $313,529 tax benefit)		—			—			—		(470,293	)		—			(470,293	)		(470,293	)
Total Comprehensive Income									$	(37,614,931	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		3,823,634		$	12,027,473		$	1,181,926				$	(13,774,971	)	$	326,994		$	(238,578	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	2009			2008			2007
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net (Loss)/Income	$	(37,628,026	)	$	4,828,734		$	4,209,114
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss)/Income to Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		759,655			848,592			908,862
Provision for loan losses		50,845,681			3,190,957			243,956
Change in deferred income taxes		2,048,000			(428,408	)		(223,000	)
Change in deferred costs, net of amortization		(580,391	)		125,974			413,072
Change in loan servicing asset, net of amortization		44,518			57,894			(23,607	)
Net amortization of premiums on investment securities		258,929			65,077			79,215
Share based compensation		232,438			286,275			264,531
FHLB stock dividends		—			(386,500	)		(281,400	)
Loss/(Gain) on Sale of Loans		67,219			(166,293	)		(584,748	)
Loans originated for Sale		—			(300,000	)		(11,383,875	)
Proceeds from Loan Sales		63,456,961			7,345,593			11,994,373
Loss on sale of premises and equipment		2,341			—			—
Write-down on fixed assets		11,020			—			—
Net (gain)/loss on of sale of investment securities		(783,822	)		5,780			—
Loss/(Gain) on sale of other real estate owned		474,309			—			—
Write-down of OREO		1,014,215			—			—
Net change in bank owned life insurance		(365,909	)		(441,562	)		(387,374	)
Decrease/(increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(11,910,536	)		(2,682,518	)		(438,819	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		—			—			(16,689	)
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,160,613			492,817			81,489
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		69,107,215			12,842,412			4,855,100
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Loans originated or purchased, net of repayments		(32,452,893	)		(129,908,065	)		(43,975,298	)
Principal reduction in securities available-for-sale		14,491,109			7,947,509			5,719,268
Principal reduction in securities held-to-maturity		2,183,045			3,689,012			7,231,771
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale		1,461,374			(29,417,111	)		(19,316,939	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		2,816,674			—			—
Net change in interest earning deposits		379,301			69,353			359,918
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			(1,379,600	)		(2,246,500	)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			—			1,533,900
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale		19,598,706			4,258,911			—
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale		(27,027,270	)		1,999,759			—
Purchase of bank owned life insurance		—			—			(10,000,000	)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		3,250			—			—
Purchase of property and equipment		(163,833	)		(129,951	)		(287,818	)
Net Cash Used By Investing Activities		(18,710,537	)		(142,870,183	)		(60,981,698	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net change in deposits		26,916,058			99,126,363			(8,629,987	)
Net change in FHLB advances		(64,000,000	)		36,577,500			60,256,723
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures		—			—			10,310,000
Redemption of junior subordinated debentures		—			—			(10,310,000	)
Net change in long term debt		185,614			6,000,000			—
Dividends paid		(229,418	)		(830,928	)		(559,710	)
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of stock dividend		—			—			(1,162	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		—			—			16,689
Stock repurchases		—			—			(2,455,627	)
Stock option exercise proceeds		—			50,000			248,138
Net Cash (Used)/Provided By Financing Activities		(37,127,746	)		140,922,935			48,875,064

Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	13,268,932		$	10,895,164		$	(7,251,534	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year		15,919,664			5,024,500			12,276,034
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year	$	29,188,596		$	15,919,664		$	5,024,500
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest paid	$	16,552,996		$	19,813,303		$	16,320,856
Income taxes paid	$	1,970,000		$	3,342,389		$	2,200,000
Transfer of loans held-for-investment to held-for-sale	$	59,985,443		$	6,840,592		$	—
Transfer of loans to OREO	$	8,468,399		$	417,207		$	—
Loans to facilitate	$	388,000		$	—		$	—
Non-Cash Investing Activities

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income	$	(13,095	)	$	106,715		$	329,704

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Introductory Explanation

On January 30, 2009, the Company filed amended Articles of Incorporation for the Bank with the Secretary of State of the State of California whereby the Bank converted from a California industrial bank to a California state chartered commercial bank. On January 30, 2009, the Company also notified the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the FDIC that the amendment to the Bank’s Articles of Incorporation amending the purpose clause to provide that the Bank is authorized to conduct a commercial banking business was filed with the California Secretary of State.

Accordingly, as of January 30, 2009, the Bank was a commercial bank and the transaction by which the Company became a BHC was consummated as of that date.

NOTE 1: Regulatory Action

The Order is a formal corrective action pursuant to which the Bank has agreed to address specific areas through the adoption and implementation of procedures, plans and policies designed to enhance the safety and soundness of the Bank. These affirmative actions include, among others, the implementation of a capital plan which specifies how the bank will attain and maintain a Tier I Capital Ratio of not less than 9% and a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of not less than 12% by December 31, 2009, a contingency plan in the event that the Bank has not adequately complied with the capital requirements; have and retain qualified management of the Bank, assess management and staffing needs, qualifications and performance; maintain a fully funded allowance for loan losses; reduce commercial real estate loans; review, revise and adhere to the Bank’s loan policy, develop a liquidity funds management policy; not accept, renew or roll-over brokered deposits without obtaining regulatory approval; not pay cash dividends without regulatory approval; and furnish quarterly progress reports to the FDIC and CDFI regarding its compliance with the Order.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2010, as previously disclosed, the Bank entered into the Order as described above with the FDIC and CDFI on September 14, 2009. As a result of the Order, the Company entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “Federal Reserve”) effective January 14, 2010 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement generally provides for the development and implementation of actions to ensure the Bank complies with the Order, and any other supervisory action taken by the Bank’s federal or state regulators. Among other things, the Agreement requires the Company to:

	●	Not declare or pay any dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors (the “Division Director”);
	●	Not make any distribution of interest, principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Division Director;
	●	Not incur, increase, or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve;
	●	Submit a written capital plan to the Federal Reserve within 60 days of the Agreement;
	●	Provide a written statement regarding cash flow projections for 2010 within 60 days of the Agreement and submit a cash flow projection for each calendar year thereafter;
	●	Comply with notice and approval requirements under applicable law and regulations relating to the appointment of directors, senior executive officers as well as any change in the responsibilities of any senior executive officers; and,
	●	Comply with the restrictions on indemnification and severance payments under applicable law and regulations.

The Agreement specifies certain timeframes for meeting the requirements of the Agreement. The Company has established an Oversight committee to monitor and coordinate compliance with the Agreement and such remedial measures are in process. The Agreement will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the Federal Reserve. The failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement could result in significant enforcement actions against the Company.

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010, the Bank received a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive (the “Directive”) from the FDIC due to the Bank’s “significantly undercapitalized” status as of December 31, 2009, under regulatory capital guidelines. The Bank was already subject to many of the restrictions of the Directive and addressing these items before its receipt of the Directive.

The Directive provides that within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. While no assurance can be given that it will be successful in its efforts to recapitalize the Bank, the Company has been, with the assistance of its investment banking firm, actively engaged in seeking additional capital from various sources.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. The most complex accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. The Company has established detailed policies and control procedures that are intended to result in valuation methods being well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to provide a process whereby changing methodologies will be implemented in an appropriate manner. The following is a brief description of the current accounting policies involving significant management valuation judgments.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Investment in Nonconsolidated Subsidiary

The Company accounts for its investments in its wholly owned special purpose entities, San Rafael Capital Trust I (paid off in 2007), II and III, using the equity method under which the subsidiaries’ net earnings are recognized in the Company’s statement of income.

Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting policies underlying the preparation of these financial statements require management to make estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments may affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The most significant of these involve the Allowance for Loan Losses, as discussed below under “Allowance for Loan Losses and the valuation reserve for Deferred Tax Assets, as discussed under “Income Taxes.”

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold, money market mutual funds, and other investments with original maturities of less than 90 days, presenting insignificant risk of changes in value due to interest rate changes.

The Bank is required at times to maintain a reserve balance with the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank met reserve balance requirements with vault cash and was not required to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank.

Investment Securities

Investments in debt and equity securities are classified as either held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale. Investments classified as held-to-maturity are those that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity and are reported at their remaining unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums or nonaccreted discounts. Investments that are bought and held principally for the purposes of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Investments that will be held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that may be sold in response to changes in market interest or prepayment rates, needs for liquidity, and changes in the availability of and the yield of alternative investments, are classified as available-for-sale. These investments are carried at fair market value which is determined using published quotes as of the close of business. If quoted market prices are not available, we obtain pricing information from a reputable third-party service provider, who may utilize valuation techniques that use current market-based or independently sourced parameters, such as bid prices, dealer-quote prices, interest rates, benchmark yield curves, prepayment speeds, and credit spreads. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported net of related tax and recorded as other comprehensive income and included in shareholders’ equity until realized.

The amortized cost of investment securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity or, in the case of mortgage-backed securities, over the estimated life of the security, using a method that approximates the effective interest method. Such amortization and accreted interest are included in interest income. Gains and losses on sales of investments are recognized based on specific identification and are included in noninterest income.

Declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and, (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of fair value.

Loans

Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans and premiums and discounts on purchased loans. The Bank’s decision to hold these loans for investment is based on the Bank’s intent and ability to hold the portfolio for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The Bank’s loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding net of deferred fees and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued daily on the outstanding loan balances using the simple interest method. The Bank’s policy is to place loans on non-accrual status when, for any reason, principal or interest is past due for ninety days or more unless they are both well secured and in the process of collection or if the Bank determines that there is little to no chance of being paid current by the borrower. In addition, some loans secured by real estate with temporarily impaired values and commercial loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties are placed on nonaccrual status even though the borrowers continue to repay the loans as scheduled. When loans are placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued but uncollected interest is reversed from current period interest income, and additional income is recorded only as payments are received. Loans are generally charged off at such time as the loan is classified as a loss. Loan origination fees, net of direct underwriting costs, are deferred and amortized to income by use of a method that approximates a level yield over the contractual lives of the related loans. If a loan is paid off prior to maturity, then the remaining unamortized deferred fee is immediately recognized to interest income.

The Bank defines a loan as impaired when it is probable the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Since most of the Bank’s loans are collateral dependent, the calculation of the impaired loans is generally based on the fair value of the collateral. Income recognition on impaired loans conforms to the method the Bank uses for income recognition on nonaccrual loans. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance. Nonaccrual loans are reinstated to accrual status when improvements in the credit quality eliminate doubt as to the full collectability of both interest and principal.

Loans Held-for-Sale

Loans held-for-sale are reported at the lower of cost or estimated “net realizable” value. Gains or losses on loan sales are recognized at the time of the sale and are determined by the difference between net sale proceeds and the net book value of the loans less the estimated fair value of any retained mortgage servicing rights.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for known losses as well as unidentified losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based upon management’s assessment of various factors affecting the collectability of the loans, including current and projected economic conditions, past credit experience, delinquency status, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and review of the portfolio of loans and commitments.

The allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, and ultimate losses may vary from the current estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become known. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and is reduced by net charge-offs.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations. When property is acquired, any excess of the recorded investment in the loan balance and accrued interest income over the estimated fair market value of the property less estimated selling costs is charged against the allowance for loan losses. A valuation allowance for losses on other real estate is maintained to provide for declines in value after acquisition. The allowance is established through a provision for losses on other real estate which is included in noninterest other administrative expenses. Subsequent gains or losses on sales or write downs resulting from further declines in fair value are recorded in other income or expense as incurred. There was $3,587,000 and $417,000 in other real estate owned at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Investment in Affordable Housing

The Company is a limited partner in limited partnerships that invest in low-income housing projects that qualify for Federal and/or State income tax credits. The investment is recorded in other assets on the balance sheet and is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

Loan Sales and Servicing

Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sale of loans. For sales of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans prior to January 1, 2007, a portion of the cost of the loan was allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair values. The Company adopted “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets”, on January 1, 2007, for sales of SBA loans beginning in 2007. Servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gain on sale of loans. Fair value is based on a valuation that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows from the servicing assets. The valuation model uses assumptions that market participants would use in estimating cash flows from servicing assets, such as the cost to service, discount rates and prepayment speeds. The Company compares the valuation model inputs and results to published industry data in order to validate the model results and assumptions. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimate future net servicing income of the underlying loans.

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to the carrying amount. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into groupings based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. For purposes of measuring impairment, the Company has identified each servicing asset with the underlying loan being serviced. A valuation allowance is recorded when the fair value is below the carrying amount of the asset. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and changes in the discount rates.

Servicing fee income which is reported on the income statement as servicing income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal and recorded as income when earned.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Premises and Equipment

Furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated by the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or lease terms. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five to eight years, and equipment is generally depreciated over three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the leases or their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company files its income taxes on a consolidated basis with its subsidiaries. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with “Accounting for Income Taxes”, resulting in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense approximates taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the balance sheet method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and recognizes enacted changes in tax rates and laws in the period in which they occur.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management judgment that realization is more likely than not. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement. A valuation reserve is established for deferred tax assets for which realization is unlikely or doubtful. Interest and penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense.

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Earnings/(Loss) Per Share

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. However, the Company realized a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the effects of any outstanding options and warrants would be anti-dilutive on earning per share.

Salary Continuation Plan

The Company has entered into salary continuation plans with certain executive officers. The liability is based on estimates involving life expectancy, length of time before retirement, appropriate discount rate, forfeiture rates and expected benefit levels. Should these estimates prove materially different from actual results, the Company could incur additional or reduced future expense.

Share-Based Compensation

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

All derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and are measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. For derivatives not designated as hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings, in noninterest income.

The accrued net settlements on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in interest income or interest expense based on the item being hedged. Changes in fair value of derivatives including accrued net settlements that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in noninterest income.

When a cash flow hedge is discontinued, but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transaction is still expected to occur, changes in value that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized or accreted into earnings over the same periods which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Current Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which established the Codification to become the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, with the exception of guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and its staff. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification is not intended to change GAAP, but rather is expected to simplify accounting research by reorganizing current GAAP into approximately 90 accounting topics. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” had no impact on retained earnings and will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006, an accounting standard was issued related to fair value measurements, which was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. This standard defined fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities. The Company deferred adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

In April 2009, an accounting standard was issued which provided guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and in identifying transactions that are not orderly. In such instances, the accounting standard provides that management may determine that further analysis of the transactions or quoted prices is required, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with GAAP. The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009. The provisions in this accounting standard were applied prospectively and did not result in significant changes to the Company’s valuation techniques. Furthermore, the adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

In April 2009, an accounting standard was issued that related to disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2009. As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements about the fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 23 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.”

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Derivative Financial Instruments

In March 2008, an accounting standard was issued that related to disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities. Expanded qualitative disclosures required under this accounting standard included: (1) how and why an entity uses derivative financial instruments; (2) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under GAAP; and (3) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.

This accounting standard also required several added quantitative disclosures in financial statements. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2009. As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedged items, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 24 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”

Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments for Debt Securities

In April 2009, an accounting standard was issued which amended other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) guidance in GAAP for debt securities by requiring a write-down when fair value is below amortized cost in circumstances where: (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security; (2) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and an amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This accounting standard does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI write-downs of equity securities. This accounting standard also extends disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities to interim reporting periods. The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net income.

Future Application of Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, an accounting standard was issued which amends current GAAP related to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, including the removal of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from GAAP. This new accounting standard also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing direct or indirect involvement with the transferred financial asset. This accounting standard is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after December 31, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

In June 2009, an accounting standard was issued which will require a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for consolidation purposes. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This accounting standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.

NOTE 3: Investment Securities

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities classified as available-for-sale and held–to-maturity resulting in investment securities available-for-sale being carried at fair value and investment securities held-to-maturity being carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretions of discounts.

The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the available-for-sale investment securities as of December 31, 2009, follows:

			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value

Mortgage backed securities - Agency guaranteed	$	7,533,477	$	148,456	$	(1,150	)	$	7,680,783
U.S. Agency Securities		2,971,901		46,839		—			3,018,740
Municipal Securities		3,340,080		27,100		(26,475	)		3,340,705
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations		36,452,209		466,740		(7,789	)		36,911,160
Total Available-for-sale	$	50,297,667	$	689,135	$	(35,414	)	$	50,951,388

All of the Collateral Mortgage Obligations are backed by Agency-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities or agency-guarantee loans.

The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investment securities as of December 31, 2009, follows:

			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value

Mortgage backed securities - Agency guaranteed	$	5,807,181	$	82,626	$	(9,738	)	$	5,880,069

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

All of the Collateral Mortgage Obligations are backed by Agency-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities or agency-guarantee loans.

The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the available-for-sale investment securities as of December 31, 2008, follows:

			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value

Mortgage backed securities - Agency guaranteed	$	14,944,115	$	369,234	$	(114,624	)	$	15,198,725
U.S. Agency Securities		5,167,184		124,861		—			5,292,045
Municipal Securities		5,225,086		68,801		(38,362	)		5,255,525
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations		30,176,960		495,877		(3,405	)		30,669,432
Total Available-for-sale	$	55,513,345	$	1,058,773	$	(156,391	)	$	56,415,727

The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investment securities as of December 31, 2008, follows:

			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value

Mortgage backed securities - Agency guaranteed	$	10,773,579	$	15,041	$	(290,127	)	$	10,498,493

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available–for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2009, by expected maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. In addition, such factors as prepayments and interest rates may affect the yield on the carrying value of mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not hold any high-risk collateralized mortgage obligations that entail higher risks than standard mortgage-based securities.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	For the year ended December 31, 2009
		Securities
		Amortized
	Maturity	Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-Sale
	1 year or less	$	3,508,209	$	3,631,657
	1 to 5 years		15,893,019		16,238,035
	5 to 10 years		28,911,244		29,084,405
	Over 10 years		1,985,195		1,997,291
		$	50,297,667	$	50,951,388

Held-to-maturity, at cost	1 year or less	$	1,639,026	$	1,653,212
	1 to 5 years		1,063,802		1,080,490
	5 to 10 years		1,486,299		1,512,922
	Over 10 years		1,618,054		1,633,445
		$	5,807,181	$	5,880,069

The Company held nine and twenty seven securities that were in an unrealized loss position and are summarized and classified according to the duration of the loss period for 2009 and 2008, respectively, as outlined below.

	December 31, 2009

	< 12 continuous months					> 12 continuous months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Available-for-Sale
Mortgage backed securities	$	395,789	$	(1,150	)	$	—	$	—
Municipal Securities		1,359,992		(26,474	)		—		—
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation		4,863,639		(7,789	)		—		—
Total Available-for-Sale	$	6,619,420	$	(35,413	)	$	—	$	—

		December 31, 2009
	< 12 continuous months				> 12 continuous months
		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss

Held-to-Maturity
Mortgage-Backed Securities	$	—	$	—	$	1,151,806	$	(9,738	)

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	December 31, 2008

	< 12 continuous months					> 12 continuous months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Available-for-Sale
Mortgage backed securities	$	3,001,416	$	(37,288	)	$	3,267,709	$	(77,336	)
Municipal Securities		1,533,053		(38,362	)		—		—
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation		5,094,246		(3,405	)		—		—
Total Available-for-Sale	$	9,628,715	$	(79,055	)	$	3,267,709	$	(77,336	)

	December 31, 2008

	< 12 continuous months					> 12 continuous months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Held-to-Maturity
Mortgage-Backed Securities	$	4,248,194	$	(80,112	)	$	5,688,638	$	(210,015	)

Management periodically evaluates each investment security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. This temporary impairment is attributable to general changes in short-term and intermediate interest rates as measured by the U.S. Treasury yield curve. The ratings of the issuers were reviewed and no issuers were identified related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. Management has determined that no investment security is impaired due to credit quality and no investment security is other-than-temporarily impaired.

Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale during 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $19,598,706, $4,258,911 and $0, respectively. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, gross gains on those sales were $808,651, $11,840 and $0, respectively, and gross losses on those sales were $24,829, $17,620 and $0, respectively. Proceeds from principal reductions of mortgage-backed securities in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $14,491,109, $7,947,509 and $12,951,039, respectively. Proceeds from principal reductions of held-to-maturity securities in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $2,183,045, $3,689,012 and $0, respectively. Included in stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $173,670 and $371,474 net unrealized gains (net of $115,780 and $222,831 estimated tax expense for 2009 and 2008, respectively).

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 4: Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The majority of the Bank’s loan activity is with customers located in California, primarily in the Northern California region. The Bank’s loan portfolio is primarily real estate located in Northern California with approximately 94.0% of the loans secured by real estate.

Outstanding loans at December 31, consisted of the following:

	2009		2008

One-to-four family residential	$	32,287,692	$	33,695,013
Multifamily residential		122,891,068		171,135,977
Commercial real estate		281,409,810		322,860,535
Land		9,766,426		10,905,347
Construction real estate		33,666,750		31,076,822
Consumer loans		1,556,313		2,111,004
Commercial, non real estate		35,715,829		18,913,301
		517,293,888		590,697,999
Net deferred loan costs		1,441,655		1,845,182
	$	518,735,543	$	592,543,181

There were $59,985,443 in Loans Held-for-Sale at December 31, 2009 and none for the same period in 2008.

Net unamortized premiums on purchased loans amounted to $206,854 and $254,741 for 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Bank also originates SBA loans only in the Bank’s market area. Depending on its current asset/liability strategy, the Bank may sell the guaranteed portion of the SBA loans to governmental agencies and institutional investors. The Bank generally receives a premium in excess of the adjusted carrying value of the loan at the time of sale. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 the unpaid balance of SBA loans not sold totaled $69,111,606 and $75,142,440, respectively.

Nonaccruing loans totaled $43,358,523 $16,758,314, and $466,080 at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. As of December 31, 2009, $43,358,523 loans on nonaccrual were classified as impaired. If interest on nonaccrual loans had been recognized at the original interest rates, interest income would have increased $2,920,561, $496,900, and $10,188 for the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:

	2009		2008		2007

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance	$	28,290,680	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance		15,067,843		16,758,314		466,080
Total impaired loans	$	43,358,523	$	16,758,314	$	466,080
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	5,056,042	$	—	$	—

Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	31,296,109	$	3,210,296	$	729,355

Cash receipts applied to reduce principal balance	$	469,781	$	492,298	$	—

Interest income recognized for cash payments	$	69,052	$	97,369	$	—

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank had no loan past due 90 days or more in principal or interest and still accruing interest. The Bank had no loans classified as troubled debt restructuring for December 31, 2009 and 2008

A summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses is as:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007
Balance, Beginning of Year	$	8,093,499		$	4,914,553		$	4,671,596
Provision for loan losses		50,845,681			3,190,957			243,956
Charge Offs
Multifamily residential		(13,889,733	)		—			—
Commercial real estate		(21,026,056	)		—			—
Consumer Loans		(28,039	)		(37,268	)		(999	)
One-to-four family residential		(93,954	)		—			—
Construction		(807,336	)		—			—
		(35,845,118	)		(37,268	)		(999	)
Recoveries								—
Consumer loans		516			25,257			—
Multifamily residential		3,319			—			—
Commercial real estate					—			—
		3,835			25,257			—

Balance, End of Year	$	23,097,897		$	8,093,499		$	4,914,553

NOTE 5: Loan Servicing

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others were $28,697,052 and $27,206,436 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in these amounts are SBA loans sold to governmental agencies and institutional investors. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the unpaid principal balance of SBA loans serviced for others totaled $22,545,793 and $19,205,760, respectively.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Activity for SBA servicing rights, included with other assets on the balance sheet, that are measured at amortized cost and related valuation allowance, fair value and key assumptions used to estimate the fair value are as follows:

The following summarizes servicing assets capitalized and amortized:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2007

Carrying Amount at Beginning of Year	$	215,744		$	273,638		$	250,031
Additions from SBA Loan Sales		—			4,457			84,234
Amortization		(44,518	)		(62,351	)		(60,627	)
		171,226			215,744			273,638

Less Valuation Allowance		—			—			—
Carrying Amount at End of Year	$	171,226		$	215,744		$	273,638

Fair Value, Beginning of Year		250,664			367,789			392,344
Fair Value, End of Year		252,380			250,664			367,789

Discount Rates	6.25% to 8.25%			6.25% to 8.25%			8.00% to 8.75%
Prepayment Speeds	12.00% to 16.00%			15.00% to 20.00%			15.00% to 20.00%

NOTE 6: Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:

	2009		2008
Furniture and equipment	$	2,658,341	$	2,656,250
Leasehold improvements		5,483,259		5,466,739
		8,141,600		8,122,989
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		4,818,806		4,198,779
Construction-in-progress		—		11,020
Total	$	3,322,794	$	3,935,230

Depreciation and amortization expense included in noninterest expense amounted to $759,654, $848,592 and $908,862 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 7: Investment in Affordable Housing

In 2006, the Company agreed to invest $2,000,000 in a limited liability partnership operating qualified affordable housing project to receive tax benefits. In 2007, the Company agreed to invest $2,000,000 for another limited liability partnership operating qualified affordable housing project to receive tax benefits. These low-income housing credit (“LIHC”) investments provide tax benefits to investors in the form of tax deductions from operating losses and tax credits. Based upon the Company’s contribution as stated above, the Company will receive 6.13% interest in these investments.

For 2009 and 2008, the Company funded $126,199 and $1,095,800, respectively, and the amortization expense was $351,907 and $318,595, respectively. The total funding since inception is $4,000,476. The Company has a commitment to fund as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 an additional $0 and $125,723, respectively, for the purposes of obtaining tax credits and for Community Reinvestment Act purposes. The investment is recorded in other assets on the balance sheet and is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company recognizes its ownership share of the profits and losses of the fund. This investment is regularly evaluated for impairment by comparing the carrying value to the remaining tax benefits expected to be received or to estimates of the net value the Bank could receive if the Bank sold these investments to investors in the secondary market for these types of CRA eligible tax credit investments. Tax credits received from the fund are accounted for in the period earned (the flow-through method) and are included in income as a reduction of income tax expense.

The partnership must meet regulatory requirements for affordable housing for a minimum 15-year compliance period to fully utilize the tax credits. If the partnership ceases to qualify during the compliance period, the credits may be denied for any period in which the projects are not in compliance and a portion of the credits previously taken is subject to recapture with interest.

NOTE 8: Deposits

Following is a summary of deposits at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

	2009								2008
						Weighted								Weighted
			Deposit			Average					Deposit			Average
	Balance		Mix			Rate			Balance		Mix			Rate

Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	43,362,167		8.9	%		0.00	%	$	33,259,929		7.2	%		0.00	%
Interest-bearing checking deposits		7,171,790		1.5	%		0.26	%		9,735,689		2.1	%		0.39	%
Money Market and savings deposits		128,632,912		26.4	%		1.17	%		156,479,340		34.1	%		1.79	%
Certificates of deposit over $100,000		83,360,987		17.1	%		2.36	%		128,182,646		27.8	%		2.19	%
Certificates of deposit < $100,000		224,689,262		46.1	%		2.41	%		132,643,456		28.8	%		3.39	%
Total deposits	$	487,217,118		100.0	%		1.83	%	$	460,301,060		100.0	%		2.20	%

Interest expense on time certificates of deposits greater than $100,000 was $3,910,202, $4,744,376 and $4,673,578 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

At December 31, 2008, the scheduled maturities of total time deposits are as follows:

Year Ending
December 31,	Total
2010	$	202,080,235
2011		84,046,376
2012		17,577,899
2013		2,265,293
2014		2,080,445
	$	308,050,249

Brokered deposits, totaled $91,960,360 and $84,784,013 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are included as a component of certificates of deposit and money market savings.

NOTE 9: Borrowings

Total Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings were $119,085,000 and $183,085,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008. The following table summarizes the borrowings:

December 31,	Weighted Average Rate			Balance
2010	3.73	%	$	44,090,000
2011	3.87	%		45,995,000
2012	3.74	%		16,000,000
2013	3.74	%		13,000,000
	3.79	%	$	119,085,000

The maximum amount outstanding at any month end for FHLB borrowings was $181,085,000 and $183,085,000 during 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Bank maintains collateralized lines of credit with the FHLB. The Bank pledges both loans and investment securities to FHLB as needed to secure borrowings. Loans with a principal balance of $356,076,805 have been pledged to secure advances of $119,085,000 and investment securities with a borrowing capacity of $6,352,925. Advances have a fixed rate of interest and bear interest at a weighted-average rate of 3.79% percent and range in maturity from one business day to four years. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank had unused borrowing capacity with the FHLB of $35,237,867 and $94,699,711, respectively. The Bank also has available unused unsecured lines of credit totaling $0 and $20.0 million, respectively, for Federal Funds transactions at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company issued a 30-year, $3,093,000 variable rate junior subordinated debenture. The security matures on September 1, 2036 but is callable after September 1, 2011. The interest rate on the debenture is paid quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 175 basis points. As of December 31, 2009, the interest rate was 2.01%. The debenture is subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of the Company.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

During the third quarter of 2007, the Company issued a 30-year, $10,310,000 variable rate junior subordinated debenture. The security matures on December 1, 2037 but is callable on December 1, 2012. The interest rate on the debenture is paid quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 144 basis points. As of December 31, 2009, the interest rate was 1.70%. The debenture is subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of the Company.

In light of the continuing challenging economic conditions, on July 9, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors has elected, pursuant to the terms of the respective indentures, to defer distributions on its $13.4 million of outstanding junior subordinated debentures. The Company may defer interest for up to five years without triggering an event of default, pursuant to the indentures. Total interest expense attributable to the junior subordinated debentures during 2009 versus the same period for 2008 was $724,000 and $636,000, respectively.

On March 28, 2008, the Company obtained a $5 million credit facility from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank. The credit facility bears floating interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR and will mature on March 28, 2018. The interest rate resets quarterly. The Company paid a loan fee of 0.50% of the loan amount. An initial disbursement of $3 million was received on March 31, 2008. The Company received the $2 million in additional disbursements in the second quarter of 2008. The facility is a non-revolving line of credit for the first twelve months with quarterly interest only payments. After the first twelve months the facility converts to a nine year amortizing loan with quarterly principal and interest payments. The facility cannot be paid down below $3 million during the first twelve months and can be prepaid without penalty after the first twelve months. As of December 31, 2009, the floating interest rate on the $5 million credit facility that the Company obtained on March 28, 2008 was equal to three-month LIBOR plus 5.25%, which includes a default rate premium of 5.00% added to the base margin over LIBOR due to the Company’s default on certain loan covenants as explained further below.

On June 26, 2008, the Company obtained a $1 million credit facility from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank. The credit facility bears floating interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR and will mature on June 26, 2018. The interest rate resets quarterly. The Company paid a loan fee of 0.75% of the loan amount. The $1 million was disbursed on June 26, 2008. The facility is a non-revolving line of credit for the first twelve months with quarterly interest only payments. After the first twelve months the facility converts to a nine-year amortizing loan with quarterly principal and interest payments. The facility cannot be paid down below $1 million during the first twelve months and can be prepaid without penalty after the first twelve months. As of December 31, 2009, the floating interest rate on the $1 million credit facility was equal to three-month LIBOR plus 6.00%, which includes a default rate premium of 5.00% added to the base margin over LIBOR due to the Company’s default on certain loan covenants as explained further below.

On July 9, 2009, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Waiver Agreement with Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank with respect to these two credit facilities (the “Amendment”). Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank agreed to a temporary and limited waiver of the Company’s failure to comply with the debt service coverage ratio covenant during the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. The Amendment also revised the agreements with respect to the two credit facilities by adding additional negative covenants that set maximum limits on the amount of nonperforming assets and a minimum amount of the allowance for loan losses. In addition, pursuant to the Amendment, the Company agreed to establish a reserve account in the amount of $775,000 on or before August 31, 2009. The Company agreed to make a principal reduction payment equal to $2,000,000 by no later than November 30, 2009. The Company has also agreed that it will reduce the outstanding principal amount of the loans with a portion of proceeds in the event of certain capital raising transactions.

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

On September 3, 2009 the Bank received notice from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank that one or more events of default have occurred under the two business loan agreements dated March 28, 2008 and as of June 26, 2008. The Company has not yet established a Reserve Account with Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank, nor has the Company paid the $2,000,000 principal reduction payment and, accordingly, is in default under the Agreements. Additionally, the Holding Company accrued but didn’t make its quarterly interest and principal payment due to Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank as of December 31, 2009 due to insufficient liquidity. On September 3, 2009 the Bank received notice from Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank that one or more events of default have occurred under the two business loan agreements dated March 28, 2008 and as of June 26, 2008.

Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank informed the Company that it may, in its discretion, choose to delay exercise of the Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank remedies or to exercise fewer than all of the remedies that are available to it, and that any such action or inaction on Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank part does not constitute a waiver of any of the Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank’s rights under law or under the loan documents. The Agreements are not obligations of the Bank and the Bank. However, nonpayment of the Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank obligations by the Company has resulted in a default by the Bank on its borrowing agreement with the FHLB under a cross-default provision in that agreement. As a result of this default, FHLB has the option to, among other things, declare the $119.1 million principal amount of advances outstanding under the advances and security agreement immediately due and payable or foreclose on the securities and loans pledged as collateral securing the advances.

Total interest expense attributable to the long term debt for 2009 and 2008 was $288,000 and $213,000, respectively.

The Company is dependent upon the payment of cash dividends from its subsidiary, the Bank, to service its commitments. As a result of the Order described in this report, the Bank is unable to declare and pay dividends to the Company. The Company is evaluating other measures to enhance liquidity in order for it to be able to service its commitments.

NOTE 10: Benefit Plans

Salary Continuation Plan

The Salary Continuation Plan was established in 2002 for a key employee to provide incentive for the employee to continue the employee’s current capacity. The Plan is intended to be an unfunded deferred compensation plan for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. In 2003, an additional employee was added to the Plan. The benefit under this plan for the two key employees would be equal to payments of $100,000 each per year for a period of 15 years. The first payout commenced on January 1, 2005 and continues until January 1, 2020 and the second payout commences on January 1, 2015, or upon retirement if later until January 1, 2030. The Bank has determined for 2009 and 2008 the net present value of both obligations to be $1,623,453 and $1,669,675, respectively, and the accrued pension payable was $1,233,363 and $1,210,291, respectively, assuming a discount rate of seven percent. The Bank has recorded a current year expense of $69,575 for 2009 and $75,900 for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

100

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

401(k) Savings Plan

The Company has a 401(k) tax deferred savings plan which commenced on January 1996 and is available to all employees. Under the plan, all eligible employees may elect to defer a percentage of their annual salary, subject to limitations imposed by federal tax law. The Company matches the employee deferrals at a rate set by the Board of Directors. Employees become eligible to participate in the plan after 90 days of employment with the Company and matching contributions vest immediately. The Company contributed $182,415, $181,151 and $182,465 to the plan in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively and are included in “salaries and benefits”.

NOTE 11: Bank Owned Life Insurance

In April 2007, the Bank purchased life insurance policies on the lives of certain officers of the Bank ($11,194,845 cash surrender value at December 31, 2009) related to certain employee benefit programs. The investment in the Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) policies are reported in “other assets” at the cash surrender value of the policies. The cash surrender value includes both the Bank’s original premiums invested in the life insurance policies and the accumulated accretion of policy income since inception of the policies. Income of $365,909 and $441,562 was recognized on the life insurance policies during 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is reported in “other non-interest income.”

NOTE 12: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Disclosure of the fair value information about financial instruments is required, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet. The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Certain financial instruments are excluded and all nonfinancial instruments from these disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

101

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:

	2009				2008
	Carrying				Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	29,188,596	$	29,188,596	$	15,919,664	$	15,919,664
Investment securities		56,758,569		57,202,411		67,189,306		66,914,220
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		178,733		178,733		558,034		558,034
Federal Home Loan Bank restricted stock		8,652,000		8,652,000		8,652,000		8,652,000
Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank stock		50,000		50,000		50,000		50,000
Loans net		495,637,646		507,694,000		584,449,682		619,231,000
Bank Owned Life Insurance		11,194,845		11,194,845		10,828,936		10,828,936
Accrued interest receivable		3,205,232		3,205,232		3,861,854		3,861,854

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		487,217,118		483,035,684		460,301,060		470,525,000
Federal Home Loan Advances		119,085,000		123,466,959		183,085,000		189,518,000
Long Term Debt		6,185,614		618,561		6,000,000		6,000,000
Junior subordinated debentures		13,403,000		1,340,300		13,403,000		13,403,000
Accrued interest payable		272,347		272,347		116,043		116,043

	Notional		Cost to Cede		Notional		Cost to Cede
	Amount		or Assume		Amount		or Assume
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
Commitments to extend credit	$	50,546,000	$	505,460	$	74,915,000	$	749,150

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures:

	·	Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents are valued at their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these investments.

	·	Investment Securities: Investment securities are valued at the quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, we obtain pricing information from a reputable third-party service provider, who may utilize valuation techniques that use current market-based or independently sourced parameters, such as bid prices, dealer-quoted prices, interest rates, benchmark yield curves, prepayment speeds, and credit spreads.

	·	Interest-bearing Deposits with Other Financial Institutions: The carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other interest-bearing deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current rates for similar types of deposits.

	·	Restricted Stock: The carrying values of restricted equity securities approximate fair values due to redemption provisions of the stock.

102

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007


	·	Loans: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying amounts. The fair values for other loans (for example, fixed rate commercial real estate loans, variable rate loans with initial fixed rate periods, and variable rate loans at their contractual cap or floor rates) are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics.

	·	Accrued Interest Receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

	·	Bank Owned Life Insurance: The fair value of bank owned life insurance is based on the estimated realizable market value of the underlying investments and insurance reserves.

	·	Deposits: The fair values disclosed for transaction accounts; for example, interest-bearing checking deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated contractual maturities on such time deposits.

	·	Borrowings: The fair values of the Company’s long term borrowings at December 31, 2009, are estimates of the amounts that the creditors could receive from third parties in a sale of the creditors’ extensions of credit to the Company. Due to the financial condition of the Company and the disruption of the capital markets for new subordinated debt, rates for incremental borrowings for similar types of borrowing arrangements are not available at December 31, 2009. Therefore, the Company used 10% of carrying value. The fair values of the Company’s long term borrowings at December 31, 2008, were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

	·	Accrued Interest Payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates fair value.

	·	Off-balance Sheet Instruments: Fair values of loan commitments and financial guarantees are based upon fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the counterparties’ credit standing.

103

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 13: Income Taxes

The current and deferred components of the income tax provision / (benefit) for each of the three years ended December 31, are as follows:

	2009			2008			2007
Provision for income taxes / (benefit)
Federal
Current	$	(9,960,241	)	$	3,098,566		$	2,147,842
Deferred		1,543,435			(1,113,497	)		(164,247	)
Subtotal Federal		(8,416,806	)		1,985,069			1,983,595
State
Current		2,400			765,334			362,005
Deferred		504,477			(364,503	)		(58,753	)
Subtotal State		506,877			400,831			303,252
Total	$	(7,909,929	)	$	2,385,901		$	2,286,847

The effective tax rate of the Company for 2009, 2008 and 2007 differs from the current Federal statutory income tax rate as follows:

	2009						2008						2007
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent

Federal income tax at statutory rate	$	(15,483,000	)		34.0		$	2,453,000			34.0		$	2,209,000			34.0

State franchise taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit		(3,440,000	)		7.6			248,000			3.4			226,000			3.5
Deferred tax asset valuation reserve		11,231,000			(24.7	)		—			—			—			—
Other, net		(217,929	)		0.5			(315,100	)		(4.3	)		(148,153	)		(2.2	)
	$	(7,909,929	)		17.4		$	2,385,901			33.1		$	2,286,847			35.3

104

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The following table shows the tax effects of the Company’s cumulative temporary differences as of December 31:

	2009			2008
Deferred Tax Assets	(In Thousands)
Reserve for loan losses	$	9,506		$	3,331
State NOL carryforward		2,240			—
Accruals		762			648
OREO expenses/charges		508			1
Other		77			449
Total Deferred Tax Assets		13,093			4,429

Valuation Allowance		(11,231	)		—
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Fixed assets		461			440
Deferred loan costs and fees		250			684
FHLB stock dividends		516			509
Investment securities valuation (available-for-sale)		218			209
Prepaid expenses		137			250
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities		1,582			2,092
Net Deferred Tax Assets	$	280		$	2,337

The Company had a federal taxable loss of $28.6 million in 2009, all of which will be carried back and applied against federal taxable income for the years 2004 to 2008. Total federal taxes to be recovered from the carry back of the 2009 federal net operating loss and low income housing credits is estimated to be $10.0 million. At December 31, 2009, we had $0 federal operating loss carry forwards and state operating loss carry forwards of approximately $30.3 million, which will expire at various dates beginning in 2010 thru 2019.

At December 31, 2009, $11.5 million of deferred tax assets remained after application of the federal net operating loss carry backs; $11.2 million of the deferred tax assets are dependent on future years’ taxable income and available tax strategies. A fiscal year 2009 loss position and continued near-term losses represent significant negative evidence that caused us to conclude that a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was necessary. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is deemed appropriate due to the significant doubt that the value of certain of those tax assets will be realized in the future. Accordingly, we established a valuation allowance as of December 31, 2009 for $11.2 million of deferred tax assets for which realization is solely dependent on future years’ taxable income.

The Company is subject to federal income tax and income tax of the state of California. The federal income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2009. 2008 and 2007 are open to audit by the federal authorities and the California state tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are open to audit by state authorities.

105

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

In 2008, the Company had a Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) enterprise zone audit for fiscal years 2004 and 2005. The Company had to pay $101,530 and $115,505 in taxes owed for 2004 and 2005, respectively, as a result of this audit. The amounts paid were fully accrued in the income tax expense. The FTB will be conducting another enterprise zone audit for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 in 2010.

NOTE 14: Regulatory Capital Requirements

Banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by Federal banking agencies, specifically, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on a Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, a Bank must meet specific capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of a Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. A Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy requires the Bank maintain certain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined).

As discussed in this Report, on September 14, 2009, the Bank entered into the Consent agreeing to the issuance of the Order with the FDIC and CDFI. Among other things, the Order requires the Bank to:

●	Present a written capital plan to the FDIC and the Department within 60 days of the Order by which the Bank would achieve and thereafter maintain a Tier I Capital Ratio of not less than 9% and a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of not less than 12% by December 31, 2009. The capital plan must include a contingency plan in the event that the Bank has not adequately complied with the capital requirements. The contingency plan must include provisions for the sale or merger of the Bank; and,

●	Not pay cash dividends to the Company without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the CDFI.

106

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Furthermore, as discussed in this Report, on February 19, 2010, the Bank received a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive from the FDIC. Among other things, the Directive requires the Bank to:

●

Within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that the Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. While no assurance can be given that it will be successful in its efforts to recapitalize the Bank, the Company has been, with the assistance of its investment banking firm, actively engaged in seeking additional capital from various sources.

Failure to meet the above minimum requirements pursuant to the Directive, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company’s business which could include the appointment of a conservator or receiver of the Bank.

As of December 31, 2009, the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 4.9% and Tier I capital ratio was 2.7%, which did not meet the 10.00% and 5.00% levels, respectively, specified in the definition of “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio of 4.9% and Tier I capital ratio of 2.7% were below the 12.00% and 9.00% levels for total risk-based capital and Tier I capital, respectively, that the Bank is required to achieve by December 31, 2009 pursuant to the Order. Since the Bank is no longer deemed to be well capitalized it must comply with interest rate limitations on the solicitation of retail and wholesale deposits and cannot accept brokered deposits.

The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio and Tier I capital ratio as of December 31, 2009 was (0.1)%, respectively, which did not meet the 10.00% and 5.00%, respectively, levels specified in the definition of “well capitalized” under the regulatory capital framework.

107

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Capital Ratios for the Bank:

									To Be Well
									Capitalized Under
					For Capital				Prompt Corrective
	Actual Capital				Adequacy Purposes				Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)

As of December 31, 2009:
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	25,146	4.9	%	$	41,308	8.0	%	$	51,634	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		18,482	3.6	%		20,650	4.0	%		30,975	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		18,482	2.7	%		27,080	4.0	%		33,850	5.0	%

As of December 31, 2008:

Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	62,968	10.5	%	$	48,159	8.0	%	$	60,199	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		55,423	9.2	%		24,229	4.0	%		36,343	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		55,423	8.1	%		27,471	4.0	%		34,339	5.0	%

Capital Ratios for the Company:

						For Capital
	Actual Capital					Adequacy Purposes
	Amount			Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars In Thousands)
As of December 31, 2009:

Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	(566	)	-0.1	%	$	41,348	8.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		(566	)	-0.1	%		20,673	4.0	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets		(566	)	-0.1	%		27,062	4.0	%

In light of the capital requirements specified in the Order and the Directive, as presented above, the Bank and the Company have developed a formal plan to improve their respective capital positions. Potential actions and strategies to meet the capital requirements include actively managing assets and liabilities to a smaller base, controlling operating expenses when possible and retaining earnings, if any, as an internal source of capital. The Company has also suspended making quarterly dividends on its common stock and has deferred distributions on the Company’s $13.0 million of outstanding trust preferred securities to preserve the Company’s core capital and liquidity positions. The Company does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock until its capital position improves significantly. In addition, the Board of Directors is also evaluating other alternative strategies, and has engaged a financial advisor, including raising capital. The Bank and Company have developed a formal plan and are implementing strategies designed to achieve compliance with the capital requirements specified in the Order and Directive, there is no guarantee that the plan and strategies will be successful or sufficient. If the Bank or Company does not achieve compliance with its capital requirements, we may be subject to additional regulatory actions in the future as described above.

As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had declared and paid cash dividends to the Company of $1,282,000. California State Banking Law restricts the payment of dividends. Generally, payment of dividends by the Bank is also limited under FDIC regulations. The amount that can be paid in any calendar year without prior approval of the Department of Financial Institutions cannot exceed the lesser of net profits (as defined) for the last three fiscal years less the amount of any distributions made during that three year period, or retained earnings. Under these restrictions, the Bank was able to declare dividends for the years ended December 31, 2008.

108

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 15: Commitments and Contingencies

The Bank has entered into twelve operating leases with nonaffiliates for office and branch space which expire through the year 2017. Monthly payments under these seven leases total $74,979 with some leases having scheduled annual adjustments and other leases having annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index.

Future minimum rent payments, net of sublease income, under the non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,
2010	$	821,948
2011		777,239
2012		670,469
2013		560,190
2014		165,680
Thereafter		371,571
	$	3,367,097

The above information is given for existing lease commitments and is not a forecast of future rental expense. Rental expenses included in occupancy expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $969,596, $982,389 and $902,219, respectively.

The Bank entered into sublease arrangements for portions of the leased space. Rental payments received for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $93,813, $97,759 and $89,754.

As permitted or required under California law and to the maximum extent allowable under that law, the Company has certain obligations to indemnify its current and former officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at the Company’s request in such capacity. These indemnification obligations are valid as long as the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited; however, the Company has director and officer insurance policies that mitigate the Company’s exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is minimal.

109

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 16: Concentration of Credit Risk

The majority of the Bank’s loan activity is with customers located in California, primarily in the counties of Marin, San Francisco, Alameda and Sonoma. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a large portion of its loans are for commercial property, and 94.0% of the Bank’s loans are secured by real estate. Additionally, the hospitality industry represents 15.5% of the loan portfolio.

The Bank’s loan portfolio presents significant geographic concentration as follows: San Francisco, 17.3%, Marin County, 15.3%, Alameda, 13.0%, Sonoma County, 12.4%, Contra Costa County, 6.6%, San Mateo 6.8%, Santa Clara, 4.1%, Sacramento, 3.7% and Other, 20.8%.

NOTE 17: Stock Options

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Plan (the “Plan”) in which options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, or rights to be paid based on the appreciation of the options in lieu of exercising the options, are granted at the Board of Directors’ discretion to certain employees. The Plan was originally established in 1997 and was replaced by a new Plan in 2006. The 2006 Plan terminates in 2016 and provides for a maximum of 28,890 shares (561,668 after stock splits, stock dividend and a revision to the original plan) of the Company’s common stock. Options are issued with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options generally vest 20% on each anniversary of the grant for five years or may be subject to vesting over a specific period of time, as determined by the Board of Directors. Options have a contractual term of ten years unless a shorter period is determined by the Board of Directors, or upon a specified period after termination of employment.

The Company also maintains a Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Director’s Plan”). The Director’s Plan was established in 2003 and terminates in 2013. The Director’s Plan provides for the grant of options for up to 135,890 shares of Company common stock, subject to adjustment upon certain events, such as stock splits. However, at no time shall the total number of shares issuable upon exercise of all outstanding options under the Director’s Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company and the total number of shares provided for a stock bonus or similar plan of the Company exceed thirty percent (30%) of its then outstanding shares of common stock. Options are issued with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. The options may vest immediately or may be subject to vesting over a specific period of time, as determined by the Board of Directors. Each option will expire 10 years after the date of grant, or if sooner, upon a specified period after termination of service as a Director.

110

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

A summary of activity for the Company’s options as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is presented below.

	December 31, 2009
				Weighted		Total		Average Remaining
	Number of			average		Intrinsic Value		Contractual Term
	Shares			Exercise Price		(in thousands)		(in years)

Options outstanding, beginning of period		509,792		$	12.09		—	—
Granted		—		$	6.00		—	—
Cancelled/forfeited		(103,124	)	$	11.89		—	—
Exercised		—		$	—		—	—
Options outstanding, end of year		406,668		$	12.14	$	—	6.37
Exercisable (vested), end of period		235,400		$	12.06	$	—	5.33

	December 31, 2008
				Weighted		Total		Average Remaining
	Number of			average		Intrinsic Value		Contractual Term
	Shares			Exercise Price		(in thousands)		(in years)

Options outstanding, beginning of period		410,339		$	12.26		—	—
Granted		185,750		$	11.74		—	—
Cancelled/forfeited		(80,947	)	$	12.42		—	—
Exercised		(5,350	)	$	9.35	$	12	—
Options outstanding, end of year		509,792		$	12.09	$	1,845	7.28
Exercisable (vested), end of period		221,899		$	11.77	$	732	5.66

111

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	December 31, 2007
				Weighted		Total		Average Remaining
	Number of			average		Intrinsic Value		Contractual Term
	Shares			Exercise Price		(in thousands)		(in years)

Options outstanding, beginning of period		510,734		$	11.36		—	—
Granted		80,000		$	13.44		—	—
Cancelled/forfeited		(126,429	)	$	12.66		—	—
Exercised		(53,966	)	$	4.57	$	351	—
Options outstanding, end of year		410,339		$	12.26	$	488	7.22
Exercisable (vested), end of period		211,392		$	11.52	$	95	6.43

NOTE 18: Share-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions to account for share-based compensation using the modified prospective transition method and, therefore, has not restated results for prior periods. Share-based compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards granted after January 1, 2006 is based on the grant-date fair value estimate.

The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. It is required that an estimate of future forfeitures be made and that compensation cost be recognized only for shares that are expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures and adjusts annually estimated forfeitures to actual forfeitures and only recognizes expense for those shares expected to vest. Certain of the Company’s share-based award grants contain terms that provide for a graded vesting schedule whereby portions of the award vest in increments over the requisite service period.

The Company determines fair value at grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model that takes into account the stock price at the grant date, exercise price, expected life of the option, volatility of the underlying stock, expected dividend yield and risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The risk free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. No stock options were granted in 2009, but there were 12,500 warrants issued in 2009.

112

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

			As of
	2008		December 31, 2007
Risk-free interest rate	3.42	%	4.66	%
Expected dividend yield	1.50	%	1.40	%
Expected life in years	7		7
Expected price volatility	24.24	%	25.61	%

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $3.70, $4.21 and $4.53, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 there was $912,822, $1,186,985 and $1,067,006, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements and the weighted average period over which the cost is expected to be recognized is 2.50, 3.25 and 2.92 years, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions listed above represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, the Company’s recorded share-based compensation expense could have been materially different from that reflected in these consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeitures rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from the estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.

NOTE 19: Shareholder’s Equity

Beginning in January 2006, the fair value of stock options on the grant date is recorded as an expense on the income statement with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in-capital. See Note 17 and 18 for further information on accounting for stock options and share-based payments.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders are recorded as a reduction to retained earnings. The Company declared dividends of $0.06 per share in January 2009 and November 2008, up from $0.05 per share in January 2008 and $0.055 per share in May and August 2008. On July 13, 2009, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had decided to suspend declaring quarterly dividends on its common stock.

NOTE 20: Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (EPS)

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock is calculated on both a basic and diluted basis based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings. However, the Company realized a net loss for the year ended 2009 and the effects of any outstanding options and warrants would be anti-dilutive to loss per share amounts.

113

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator of the Basic and Diluted earnings (loss) per share computations:

	As of December 31,
	2009			2008		2007
Net (Loss)/Income as Reported	$	(37,628,027	)	$	4,828,734	$	4,209,114
Weighted average shares:
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding		3,823,634			3,820,535		3,950,541
Dilutive effect of stock options		4,065			17,569		1,177
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		3,827,699			3,838,104		3,951,718

Net (loss) income per common share:
Basic	$	(9.84	)	$	1.26	$	1.07
Diluted	$	(9.83	)	$	1.26	$	1.07

NOTE 21: Transactions with Related Parties

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has granted loans to, and accepted deposits from, certain directors, officers, principal shareholders and the companies with which they are associated. All such loans and deposits were made under terms which are consistent with the Bank’s normal lending and deposit policies with the exception of the Company’s Employee Loan Program. As part of the Employee Loan Program, all employees, including executive officers, are eligible to receive mortgage loans at one percent below the industry prevailing interest rate at the time of loan origination. All loans to executive officers under the Employee Loan Program are made by the Bank in compliance with the applicable restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act.

An analysis of the activity with respect to related party loans during 2009 and 2008 are as follows.

	2009			2008

Outstanding Balance, beginning of the year	$	2,020,000		$	2,020,000
Credit granted, including renewals		670,000			—
Repayments		(1,249,750	)		—
Outstanding Balance, end of year	$	1,440,250		$	2,020,000

The Bank accepts deposits from shareholders, directors and employees in the normal course of business, and the terms are comparable to those with non-affiliated parties. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank held deposits from related parties of $822,573 and $549,770, respectively.

114

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 22: Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Bank makes commitments to extend credit in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of loans or through lines of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Bank is exposed to credit losses in the event of non performance by the borrower, in the contract amount of the commitment. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments and evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case by case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Bank is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies but primarily consists of residential and commercial property.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company has no outstanding standby Letters of Credit, approximately $22,484,000 in commitments to fund commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans, $3,840,000 in commitments to fund revolving, open ended lines secured by 1-4 family residential properties, and $24,222,000 in other unused commitments. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has no outstanding standby Letters of Credit, approximately $51,726,000 in commitments to fund commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans, $9,071,000 in commitments to fund revolving, open ended lines secured by 1-4 family residential properties, and $14,118,000 in other unused commitments.

The Bank has set aside an allowance for losses in the amount of $329,000 and $70,601 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for these commitments, which is recorded in “accrued interest payable and other liabilities.”

NOTE 23: Fair Value Measurement

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted revised fair value measurement standards. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings recorded upon adoption.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the Company groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are as follows:

●

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

115

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	●	Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations and impaired loans.

	●	Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

If quoted market prices are not available, we obtain pricing information from a reputable third-party service provider, who may utilize valuation techniques that use current market-based or independently sourced parameters, such as bid prices, dealer-quote prices, interest rates, benchmark yield curves, prepayment speeds, and credit spreads. The service provider also subscribes to several pricing services. Prices obtained from the third party service provider are used to provide fair value data for the purposes of recording amounts related to fair value measurements in the financial statements.

In order to determine if the prices are appropriate there is a month-end pricing process that includes an evaluation of process to: (1) recent market conditions, (2) previous evaluation prices, and (3) price comparison between the various pricing services that the third party subscribes to. Where appropriate, securities are repriced using a secondary or tertiary pricing service, or referred to a fixed income pricing/analytics group or a trading desk for evaluation pricing.

There are some bond market sectors and sub-sectors where no third-party service provides what we’ve determined to be acceptably accurate evaluation pricing. Furthermore, there are many fixed income securities which are simply not priced by a third-party vendor (i.e., many local non-rated municipals and other obscure, narrowly traded debt). In such cases, we use a matrix pricing provided through a joint effort of our third party’s trading desk, fixed income research and information technology personnel.

We validate the accuracy of the prices provided by the third party vendor by comparing these prices to prices obtained through our subsidiary, TWA. We thus have the ability to adjust prices received from our third party provider, although to-date we have not done so.

116

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2009. Recurring assets are initially measured at fair value and are required to be re-measured at fair value in the financial statements at each reporting date. Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis are assets that, as a result of an event or circumstance, were required to be re-measured at fair value after initial recognition in the financial statements at some time during the reporting period.

			Fair Value Measurements
			at December 31, 2009 Using

			Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant Unobservable
			Markets for Idential Assets		Observable Inputs		Inputs
Description	December 31, 2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

Available-for-sale securities	$	50,951,388	$	—	$	50,951,388	$	—
Loans Held-for-Sale		59,985,443				59,985,443
Derivative financial liabilities		287,467				287,467
	$	111,224,298	$	—	$	111,224,298	$	—


Assets and liabilities measured on a non recurring basis:

Impaired loans	$	43,358,523	$	—	$	43,053,149	$	—
Other real estate owned		3,587,468		—		3,587,468		—
	$	46,945,991	$	—	$	46,640,617	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements
			at December 31, 2008 Using

			Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant Unobservable
			Markets for Idential Assets		Observable Inputs		Inputs
Description	December 31, 2008		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

Available-for-sale securities	$	56,415,727	$	—	$	56,415,727	$	—
Derivative financial liabilities		449,889				449,889
	$	56,865,616	$	—	$	56,865,616	$	—

Assets and liabilities measured on a non recurring basis:

Impaired loans	$	16,758,314	$	—	$	16,758,314	$	—
Other real estate owned		417,207		—		417,207		—
	$	17,175,521	$	—	$	17,175,521	$	—

The following method was used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument above:

Securities – Fair values for available-for-sale securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators from market makers, when market quotes are not readily accessible or available.

Loans Held-for-Sale – Loans classified as Held-for-Sale are measured at their estimated net selling value, which is based on the prices of similar loans that were recently sold, by the Bank, if any, or the estimated selling prices of loans in the secondary loan market obtained from sources and the loan brokers.

117

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Impaired loans – A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral or the discounted expected future cash flows. The Company measures impairment on all non-accrual loans for which it has established specific reserves as part of the specific allocated allowance component of the allowance for loan losses. As such, the Company records impaired loans as non-recurring Level 2 when the fair value of the underlying collateral is based on an observable market price or current appraised value. When current market prices are not available or the Company determines that the fair value of the underlying collateral is further impaired below appraised values, the Company records impaired loans as non-recurring Level 3. At December 31, 2009, substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans not classified as Held-for-Sale were evaluated based on the fair value of their underlying collateral based upon the most recent appraisal or the market data available to Management.

Derivatives – The fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on the income approach using observable Level 2 market inputs, reflecting market expectations of future interest rates as of the measurement date. Standard valuation techniques are used to calculate the present value of the future expected cash flows assuming an orderly transaction. Valuation adjustments may be made to reflect both the Bank’s own credit risk and the counterparty’s credit quality in determining the fair value of the derivatives. Level 2 inputs for the valuations are limited to observable market prices for London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) cash rates (for the very short term), quoted prices for LIBOR futures contracts (two years and less), observable market rates for LIBOR swap rates (at commonly quoted intervals from two years to beyond the derivative’s maturity) and 1-month and 3-month LIBOR basis spreads at commonly quoted intervals. Mid-market pricing of the inputs is used as a practical expedient in the fair value measurements. Key inputs for interest rate valuations are used to project spot rates at resets specified by each swap, as well as to discount those future cash flows to present value at measurement date. When the value of any collateral placed with counterparties is less than the interest rate derivative liability, the interest rate liability position is further discounted to reflect the potential credit risk to counterparties.

Other real estate owned – Other real estate owned and foreclosed collateral are adjusted to fair value, less any estimated costs to sell, at the time the loans are transferred into this category. The fair value of these assets is based on independent appraisals, observable market prices for similar assets, or Management’s estimation of value. When the fair value is based on independent appraisals or observable market prices for similar assets, the Company records other real estate owned or foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 2. When appraised values are not available, there is no observable market price for similar assets, or Management determines the fair value of the asset is further impaired below appraised values or observable market prices, the Company records other real estate owned or foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 3.

NOTE 24: Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

In March 2008, new derivative and hedging disclosures became applicable to the Company which explains the Company’s exposure to certain risk relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are market risk and interest rate risk. In October 2008, the Bank entered into an interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of $13.0 million to hedge the interest rate associated with the $13.4 million of the variable rate junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate swap held by the Bank is scheduled to mature in December 2013. The Bank entered into an interest-rate swap agreement with a counterparty bank. The swap was designated as cash flow hedges that was reported at fair value measured on a recurring basis. The purpose of entering into the interest rate swap was to hedge the interest cash flow of the Company’s variable-rate liability though December 2013, thus reducing the volatility in the Company’s earnings.

118

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

The structure of the swap is as follows. The Company enters into a swap with a counterparty bank to allow the Company to pass on the interest-rate risk associated with the Trust Preferred Securities. The net effect of the transaction allows the consolidated Company to pay interest on the Trust Preferred Securities at a variable rate based on three month LIBOR plus a spread while the consolidated Company recognizes the financial effect of a long term fixed rate liability. The change in the market value of the swap is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Because the re-pricing characteristics of the interest rate swap closely match the re-pricing of the Trust Preferred Securities there was an immaterial amount of ineffectiveness that was recorded on the Company’s results of operation through June 2009. As explained below, the swap became ineffective as a cash flow hedge in the third quarter 2009 due to deferral of interest on the Company’s Trust Preferred Securities.

The fair value of this interest rate swap contract amounted to a payable of approximately $287,467 and $450,000 at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and was reported in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The interest expense was $390,649 and $8,624 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

As of December 31, 2009, the $211,000 third quarter reclassification from other comprehensive income to non interest expense was partially offset by a $92,430 gain in the fourth quarter of 2009 for an $118,570 year-to-date net unrealized loss on the interest rate swap. The reclassification was required because the swap became ineffective as a cash flow hedge due to the deferral of interest on the Company’s trust preferred securities which became effective September 1, 2009.

NOTE 25: Subsequent Events

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Nonrecognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management has reviewed events occurring through April 15, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued and the following subsequent events occurred requiring disclosure.

As previously disclosed, the Bank entered into an Order to Cease and Desist (the “Order”) with the FDIC and CDFI effective September 14, 2009. As a result of the Order, the Company entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco effective January 14, 2010 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement provides for the development and implementation of actions to ensure the Bank complies with the Order, and any supervisory action taken by the Bank’s federal or state regulators. Among other things, the Agreement requires the Company to:

●

Not declare or pay any dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors (the “Division Director”);

119

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	●	Not make any distribution of interest, principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Division Director;
	●	Not incur, increase, or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve;
	●	Submit a written capital plan to the Federal Reserve within 60 days of the Agreement;
	●	Provide a written statement regarding cash flow projections for 2010 within 60 days of the Agreement and submit a cash flow projection for each calendar year thereafter;
	●	Comply with notice and approval requirements under applicable law and regulations relating to the appointment of directors, senior executive officers as well as any change in the responsibilities of any senior executive officers; and,
	●	Comply with the restrictions on indemnification and severance payments under applicable law and regulations.

On January 29, 2010, TWA entered into an agreement with CSI Capital Management (“CSI”) whereby the staff of TWA will be absorbed by CSI and its clients will be referred to the San Francisco-based firm. Under terms of the agreement, the Company will share the revenues from the clients referred to CSI for a period of five years.

As we reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010, the Bank received a Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive (the “Directive”) from the FDIC due to the Bank’s “significantly undercapitalized” status as of December 31, 2009 under regulatory capital guidelines. The Bank was already subject to many of the restrictions of the Directive and addressing these items before its receipt of the Directive.

The Directive provides that within 30 days of the effective date of the Directive (by March 21, 2010), the Bank must: (1) sell enough voting shares or obligations of the Bank so that Bank will be “adequately capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines; and/or (2) accept an offer to be acquired by a depository institution holding company or combine with another insured depository institution. While no assurance can be given that it will be successful in its efforts to recapitalize the Bank, the Company has been, with the assistance of its investment banking firm, actively engaged in seeking additional capital from various sources.

The Directive also prohibits the Bank from: (1) paying interest on deposits in excess of prescribed limits; (2) accepting, renewing or rolling over any brokered deposits; (3) allowing its average total assets during any calendar quarter to exceed its average total assets during the preceding calendar quarter; (4) making any capital distributions or dividend payments to the Company or any affiliate of the Bank or the Company; and (5) establishing or acquiring a new branch and requires the Bank to obtain the approval of the FDIC prior to relocating, selling or disposing of any existing branch. In addition, the Directive provides that the Bank may not pay any bonus to, or increase the compensation of, any director or officer of the Bank without the prior approval of the FDIC, and the Bank must comply with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act without the exemption for transactions with certain affiliated institutions. Lastly the Bank may not enter into any material transaction, including any investment, expansion, acquisition, sale of assets or other similar transaction which would have a significant financial impact on the Bank without prior approval of the FDIC. The Bank has already substantially subject to each of these prohibitions prior to the issuance of the Directive, and since last year, key components of the Bank’s business strategy have included the reduction in its asset base and brokered deposits.

120

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

On March 12, 2010, the Company received a letter from the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) notifying the Company that it no longer meets NASDAQ’s continued listing requirement under Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Bid Price Rule”) because the bid price for its common stock has closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days.

The notification does not result in the immediate delisting of the Company’s common shares from the NASDAQ Capital Market because, pursuant to Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the company has 180 days, until September 8, 2010, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule. If, prior to September 8, 2010, the bid price of the Company’s common stock closes at $1.00 per share, or higher, for at least 10 consecutive business days, NASDAQ will notify the Company that the matter will be closed.

If compliance with the Bid Price Rule cannot be established prior to September 8, 2010, the Company’s common stock will be subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Capital Market. The Company may, however, be eligible for an additional 180-day grace period if it satisfies the initial listing standards (with the exception of the Bid Price Rule) for listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The Company is evaluating its options following receipt of the notification and intends to take appropriate actions in order to retain the listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market.

There were $59,985,443 in Loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, and none for the same period in 2008. There were $2,498,130, $1,219,382 and $12,021,000 carrying value of loans Held-for-Sale at December 31, 2009, that were sold in January, February and March 2010, respectively. Additionally, there were $3,264,458 principal balance of loans not classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2009, that were sold in March 2010. The first quarter of 2010 sales of the loans classified as held-for-sale and the sale of the other loans resulted in a net pre-tax gain on sale of $722,923.

In March 2010, the FDIC notified the Bank that it would not approve the request to sell $45.0 million principal balance of performing loans that were classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2009.

121

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 26: Going Concern

The conditions and events discussed in this report cast significant doubt on our ability to continue as a going concern. We have determined that significant additional sources of liquidity and capital will be required for us to continue operations through 2010 and beyond. We have engaged a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives, including potential significant capital raises, to address our current and expected liquidity and capital deficiencies. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to arrange for sufficient liquidity or to raise additional capital in time to satisfy regulatory requirements and meet our obligations as they come due. In addition, our regulators are continually monitoring our liquidity and capital adequacy. Based on their assessment of our ability to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner, our regulators may take other and further action, including assumption of control of the Bank, to protect the interests of depositors insured by the FDIC. Finally, there can be no assurance that our correspondent bank will not declare us in default or that the exploration of strategic alternatives will result in an infusion of sufficient additional capital.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future, and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of our inability to repay the outstanding principal balance of our debt or from any extraordinary regulatory action, either of which would affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

122

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

NOTE 27: Condensed Financial Information of Tamalpais Bancorp (Parent Company)

Balance Sheets

	2009			2008			2007
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	285,857		$	148,878		$	111,166
Investment in subsidiary		19,710,187			56,165,232			45,781,157
Investment in nonconsolidated subsidiary		—			407,632			408,961
Prepaids and other assets		184,722			235,891			144,280
Total Assets	$	20,180,766		$	56,957,633		$	46,445,564

Liabilities
Junior subordinated debentures		13,403,000			13,403,000			13,403,000
Other long term debt		6,185,614			6,000,000			—
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		830,730			181,300			110,027
Total Liabilities		20,419,344			19,584,300			13,513,027

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock		13,209,298			12,976,962			8,840,540
Retained earnings		(13,774,870	)		24,082,472			23,884,813
Accumulated other comprehensive income		326,994			313,899			207,184
Total Stockholders’ Equity		(238,578	)		37,373,333			32,932,537
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	20,180,766		$	56,957,633		$	46,445,564

Statements of Income

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries	$	(36,284,225	)	$	5,854,101		$	5,471,496
Other income		—			18,837			41,130
Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures		(333,144	)		(635,787	)		(1,123,231	)
Interest expense on long term debt		(287,826	)		(210,282	)		—
Other expenses		(1,530,425	)		(933,135	)		(1,095,434	)

Income Before Income Taxes		(38,435,620	)		4,093,734			3,293,961

Income Tax Benefit		807,594			735,000			915,153

Net Income	$	(37,628,026	)	$	4,828,734		$	4,209,114

123

TAMALPAIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

Statements of Cash Flows

	2009			2008			2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	(37,628,026	)	$	4,828,734		$	4,209,114
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided/(used) by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed income of Subsidiaries		36,284,225			(5,854,101	)		(5,471,496	)
Share-based compensation		32,797			73,517			114,545
Net change in assets and liabilities		896,704			472,311			628,354

Net cash used by operating activities		(414,300	)		(479,539	)		(519,483	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital contributions to Subsidiaries		(318,547	)		(5,983,821	)		(345,990	)

Net cash used by investing activities		(318,547	)		(5,983,821	)		(345,990	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Repurchase of Stock		—			—			(2,455,627	)
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures		—			—			—
Issuance of debt		500,000			6,000,000			—
Dividends received from Bank		897,000			1,282,000			3,745,000
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		(229,418	)		(830,928	)		(560,872	)
Stock options exercised		—			50,000			248,138

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,167,582			6,501,072			976,639

Net (Decrease)/Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		434,735			37,712			111,166
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year		(148,878	)		111,166			—
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year	$	285,857		$	148,878		$	111,166

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	242,579		$	597,062		$	1,049,121
Non-Cash Investing Activities
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income	$	13,094		$	106,715		$	329,704

124

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2009, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009 are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act.

The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company’s Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

125

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Tamalpais Bancorp (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. The internal control system contains monitoring mechanisms, and appropriate actions taken to correct identified deficiencies.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. In addition, because of changes in conditions and circumstances, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time and controls may become inadequate, and the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate, over time.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), is effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report on this annual report.

126

(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

For the year ended December 31, 2009, there have not been any significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect disclosure or financial reporting controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. The Company is not aware of any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses; therefore, no corrective actions were taken.

ITEM 9A (T) – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

See “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in this Annual Report.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the sections captioned “Nominees for Director”, “Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors” and “Executive Compensation – Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Executive Compensation” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The information required in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Beneficial Ownership of the Common Stock” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Certain Transactions” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

127

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in the section captioned “Ratification of the Selection of Independent Auditors” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit

1.1		Solicitor’s Agreement between CSI Capital Management and Tamalpais Wealth Advisors

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Bancorp (1)

3.2		Bylaws of the Bancorp (9)

3.3		Amendment and Restated Bylaws of the Bancorp (7)

3.4		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (12)

4.1		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (8)

4.2		Trust Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement (1)

4.3		Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture of Tamalpais Bancorp (1)

4.4		Form of Certificate Evidencing Capital Securities of San Rafael Trust II (1)

4.5		Form of Common Security Certificate of San Rafael Trust II (2)

4.6		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (6)

4.7		Trust Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement (6)

4.8		Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture of Tamalpais Bancorp (6)

4.9		Form of Certificate Evidencing Capital Securities of San Rafael Trust II (6)

4.10		Form of Common Security Certificate of San Rafael Trust II (6)

4.11		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated 7-25-07 (9)

4.12		Trust Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement dated 7-25-07 (9)

128


4.13		Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture of Tamalpais Bancorp dated 7-25-07 (9)

4.14		Form of Certificate Evidencing Capital Securities of San Rafael Trust III dated 7-25-07 (9)

4.15		Form of Common Security Certificate of San Rafael Trust III dated 7-25-07 (9)

5.1		Indemnification Agreements with respective Directors and Officers

10.1		Tamalpais Bancorp 2006 Employee Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (3) *

10.2		Salary Continuation Plan for Mark Garwood (1)*

10.3		Tamalpais Bank Defined Contribution Plan; Tamalpais Bank Defined Contribution Trust; EGTRRA Amendment for 401(k) Plans; Defined Contribution Plan Amendment (1) *

10.4		Tamalpais Bancorp 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and Agreement (2)*

10.5		Agreement signed on July 19, 2005 between TWA and Kit M. Cole (4)

10.7		Tiburon lease agreement between Tamalpais Bank and Main Street Properties (3)

10.8		Las Gallinas lease agreement between Tamalpais Bank and Citibank (4)

10.9		Tamalpais Bancorp 2006 Employee Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Plan (5)

10.10		Bank-Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) Program (8)

10.11		Agreement with Pacific Coast Bankers Bank, as amended (10)

10.12		Amendment to Mark Garwood’s SERP Agreement (11)

10.13		Approval of Executive Severance Plan

10.14		Order to Cease and Desist with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and California Department of Financial Institution (13)

10.15		Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement

10.16		Agreement with Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (14)

10.17		Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (15)

11		Earnings Per Share (See Note 20 to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report)

14		Code of Ethics

21		Subsidiaries of Tamalpais Bancorp

23		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24		Power of Attorney

129


31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certificate of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2		Certificate of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(1)	Attached as Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, respectively, to Registration Statement No. 333-105991 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)	Attached as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively to Registration Statement No. 333-132197 on Form S-8 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-135143 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the SEC at Incorporation by reference.

(4)	Attached as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(5)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-135143 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the SEC at Incorporation by reference.

(6)	Attached as Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5, respectively to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with Securities and Exchange Commission.

(7)	Attached as Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2009 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(8)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(9)	Attached as Exhibits 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5, respectively, to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with Securities and Exchange Commission.

(10)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(11)	Attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(12)	Attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by Tamalpais Bancorp with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(13)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed by Tamalpais Bancorp on September 17, 2009 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(14)	Attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Tamalpais Bancorp on January 21, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(15)	Attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Tamalpais Bancorp on February 25, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

130

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Tamalpais Bancorp has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Tamalpais Bancorp:

By:	/s/ MARK GARWOOD	By:	/s/ KARRY K. BRYAN
	Chief Executive Officer		Interim Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
	April 15, 2010		April 15, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Members of Tamalpais Bancorp’s Board of Directors:

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ CAROLYN B. HORAN	Director and Chairman of the Board	April 15, 2010
Carolyn B. Horan

/s/ RICHARD E. SMITH	Director	April 15, 2010
Richard E. Smith

/s/ EVELYN S. DILSAVER	Director	April 15, 2010
Evelyn S. Dilsaver

/s/ ALLAN G. BORTEL	Director	April 15, 2010
Allan G. Bortel

/s/ PAUL DAVID SCHAEFFER	Director	April 15, 2010
Paul David Schaeffer

/s/ MARK GARWOOD	Director and Chief Executive Officer	April 15, 2010
Mark Garwood	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ LARRY E. ROSENBERGER	Director	April 15, 2010
Larry Rosenberger

/s/ LYNNE E. CRAWFORD	Director	April 15, 2010
Lynne E. Crawford

131

TAMALPAIS BANCORP - FORM 10-K - April 15, 2010

Attached files