UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from               to

Commission file number: 000-51161

ODIMO INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		22-3607813
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

9858 Clint Moore Road, Boca Raton, Fl		33496
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(954) 993-4703
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

ODIMO INCORPORATED
FORM 10-K — ANNUAL REPORT
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I			1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			1
ITEM 1. Business			1
Item 1A. Risk factors			2
Item 2. Properties			5
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			5
PART II			6
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			6
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			7
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			7
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			11
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			11
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures			11
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures			12
Item 9B. Other Information			13
PART III			13
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			13
Item 11. Executive Compensation			14
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			15
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			17
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			18
PART IV			19
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			19
SIGNATURES			22
EX-23.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This report contains various forward-looking statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and future plans and projects. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts and can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions. In this report, for example, we make forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, our expectations about our ability to continue as a going concern.

     Although these forward-looking statements reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based upon facts and factors currently known to us. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth below under the caption “Risk Factors.” For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they were made. They give our expectations regarding the future but are not guarantees. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law.

ITEM 1.		BUSINESS

      Non-Operating Shell Company

     We are a non operating shell corporation. We intend to effect a merger, acquisition or other business combination with an operating company by using a combination of capital stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources, if available. We intend to devote substantially all of our time to identifying potential merger or acquisition candidates. There can be no assurances that we will enter into such a transaction in the near future or on terms favorable to us, or that other funding sources will be available.

      Cessation of Online Retailing Business of the Company

     Prior to May 2006, we were an online retailer of high quality diamonds and fine jewelry, current season brand name watches and luxury goods through three websites, www.diamond.com, www.worldofwatches.com and www.ashford.com. In May 2006, we sold assets related to our online diamond and jewelry business operations, including our domain name www.diamond.com. In December 2006, we sold assets related to our online watch business operations, including our domain name www.worldofwatches.com. In April 2007, we sold our domain name www.ashford.com and related intellectual property rights, product images and other intangibles.

     Other than Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Executive Officer, who, commencing in 2008, serves the Company for no compensation, we have no full time employees.

      Going Concern

     Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in our historical financial statements, we have incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations for the past several years and as of December 31, 2009, our financial statements reflect negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency.

     These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the registered public accounting firm’s report states that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

     On August 24, 2009, we received from the State of Delaware a cash refund in the amount of approximately $110,000, which represented a refund of previously paid Delaware franchise fees.

     On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board, purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     On February 4, 2008 we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to three investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board and Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     We may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy our future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities.

     Available Information

     We make available free of charge our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. All of our filings with the SEC may be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and other information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A.		RISK FACTORS

     Some of the statements in this report and in particular, statements found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that are not historical in nature may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are often identified by the words “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “hope,” or similar expressions. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, many of which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors described below.

     Our actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, and accordingly, we can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what impact they will have on our results of operations or financial condition. In view of these uncertainties, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect the occurrence of events after the date hereof.

     You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all other information included in this report, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes herein, as well as in our other public filings, before making any investment decision regarding our stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects would likely be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

We are a non-operating shell company.

     We are a public shell company with no operations and we are seeking to effect a merger, acquisition or other business combination with an operating company by using a combination of capital stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources, if available. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in identifying acquisition candidates or that if identified we will be able to consummate a transaction on terms acceptable to us.

     While we anticipate having sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities, if we do not have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities we will seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities. Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in our historical financial statements, we have incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations for the past several years and as of December 31, 2009, our financial statements reflect negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock, and, consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates.

     We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth.

Our common stock is currently quoted for trading on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board which may adversely impact the liquidity of our shares and reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

     Effective August 14, 2006, our common stock was delisted from quotation on the Nasdaq Global Market (formerly known as the Nasdaq National Market) and on the same day our common stock became quoted on the Over-The-Counter Market on the NASD Electronic Bulletin Board (OTCBB). Our common stock has historically been sporadically or “thinly traded” (meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent) and no assurances can be given that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained in the future or that current trading levels will be sustained. You may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you desire to liquidate your shares. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price.

Because our common stock is considered a “penny stock” any investment in our common stock is considered to be a high-risk investment and is subject to restrictions on marketability.

     Our common stock is currently traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTC Bulletin Board”) and is considered a “penny stock.” The OTC Bulletin Board is generally regarded as a less efficient trading market than the NASDAQ Market.

     The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and any salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must

make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock.

     Since our common stock is subject to the regulations applicable to penny stocks, the market liquidity for our common stock could be adversely affected because the regulations on penny stocks could limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and thus your ability to sell our common stock in the secondary market. There is no assurance our common stock will be quoted on NASDAQ or the NYSE or listed on any exchange, even if eligible.

Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile.

     The market price for our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control.

Future sales of our common stock may cause our stock price to decline.

     A small number of our current stockholders hold a substantial number of shares of our common stock. Shares held by our officers, directors and principal stockholders are considered “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act and, are eligible for resale subject to the volume, manner of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144.

     Sales of a substantial number of shares, or the expectation that such sale may occur, could significantly reduce the market price of our common stock. Moreover, the holders of a substantial number of our shares of common stock have rights to require us to file registration statements to permit the resale of their shares in the public market or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. We also have registered all common stock that we may issue under our stock incentive plan. Accordingly, these shares, when registered, can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to restrictions under the securities laws. If any of these stockholders cause a large number of securities to be sold in the public market, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may discourage or prevent a change in control, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders, which could affect our stock price adversely and prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

     Our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws contain provisions that may delay or prevent a change in control, discourage bids at a premium over the market price of our common stock and adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. These provisions include:

	•		Our board of directors has the exclusive right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;
	•		Our stockholders may not act by written consent. As a result, a holder or holders controlling a majority of our capital stock would be able to take certain actions only at a stockholders’ meeting;
	•		No stockholder may call a special meeting of stockholders. This may make it more difficult for stockholders to take certain actions;
	•		Our stockholders may not remove a director without cause, and our certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms. As a result, it could take up to three years for stockholders to replace the entire board;
	•		Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. This

			limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;
	•		Stockholders must provide advance notice to nominate individuals for election to the board of directors or to propose matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting. These provisions may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company; and
	•		Our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

     As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to certain Delaware anti-takeover provisions. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. Our board of directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of us.

A significant portion of our voting power is concentrated and, as a result, our other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters may be limited.

     Elao, LLC, a limited liability company controlled by Alan Lipton and a trust established for the benefit of Mr. Lipton’s minor child together own approximately 38.5% of our outstanding voting stock. Accordingly, Mr. Lipton will have significant influence over the management and affairs of Odimo and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of Odimo or its assets, for the foreseeable future. This concentrated control limits the ability of our other stockholders to influence corporate matters and, as a result, Mr. Lipton may take actions that Odimo’s other stockholders do not view as beneficial.

Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards may be limited.

     Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in its stock ownership. We have preliminarily reviewed the applicability of the annual limitations imposed by Section 382 caused by previous changes in our stock ownership and believe the availability of our net operating loss carryforwards is substantially limited. There can be no assurance that we will be able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the future. This limitation may adversely affect our ability to attract certain business combination candidates and/or consummate a business combination with an operating business.

Our limited resources make it impracticable to conduct a complete and exhaustive search for a business combination.

     Our limited resources and the lack of extensive management will likely make it impracticable to conduct a complete and exhaustive investigation and analysis of a business opportunity before we commit our resources thereto. Management decisions, therefore, will likely be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analysis, market surveys and the like which, if we had more funds available to us, would be desirable. We will be particularly dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoter, owner, sponsor, or others associated with the business opportunity seeking our participation.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     Our corporate office address is Boca Raton, Florida, where we lease approximately 200 square feet pursuant to a month to month agreement. We pay approximately $200 per month for this space.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

     Our common stock was quoted for trading on the Nasdaq National Market from February 15, 2005 through August 13, 2006 and has been quoted for trading on the OTCBB since August 14, 2006 under the symbol ODMO. Prior to February 15, 2005, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as reported on the OTCBB for the quarterly periods for fiscal years 2008 and 2009. The high and low bid prices for the periods indicated reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

		High				Low
First Quarter 2009			0.025				0.011
Second Quarter 2009			0.025				0.015
Third Quarter 2009			0.06				0.015
Fourth Quarter 2009			0.08				0.016
First Quarter 2008			0.13				0.05
Second Quarter 2008			0.08				0.05
Third Quarter 2008			0.09				0.08
Fourth Quarter 2008			0.04				0.009

     The approximate number of holders of record of our common stock as of March 25, 2010 is 39, inclusive of those brokerage firms and/or clearing houses holding shares of common stock for their clientele (with each such brokerage house and/or clearing house being considered as one holder).

Dividend Policy

     We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan

     The following table details our equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2009:

2009 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

(c)

Number of

securities

(a)

remaining

Number of

(b)

available

securities to

Weighted-

for future

be

average

issuance

issued upon

exercise price

under equity

exercise of

of

compensation plan

outstanding

outstanding

(excluding

options,

options,

securities

warrants

warrants

reflected in

Plan Category

and rights

and rights

column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

26,000

$

24.48

533,391

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—

—

—

Total

26,000

$

24.48

533,391

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

     On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     On February 4, 2008 we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to three investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board and Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares. We relied upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 in making the sale.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

     None.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

     As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item 6.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth previously under the caption “Risk Factors.” This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements

and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

     We ceased operations as an online retailer at December 31, 2006 and, other than commissions we earned prior to April 2007 which were based on a percentage of gross sales made to visitors to our www.ashford.com homepage who were redirected to websites owned and operated by others, we have recorded no net sales or other operating revenue since our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. We do not expect to generate operating revenue until such time as we consummate a business combination with an operating business, if at all. Our historical operating results disclosed in this Report on Form 10-K are not meaningful to our future results. On August 24, 2009, we received from the State of Delaware a cash refund in the amount of approximately $110,000, which represented a refund of previously paid Delaware franchise fees.

     Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in our historical financial statements, we have incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations for the past several years and as of December 31, 2009, our financial statements reflect negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency.

     These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $95,000 and $105,000, respectively. During 2009, such expenses consisted primarily of rent, accounting and other general and administrative expenses. We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will remain low until such time as we effect a merger or other business combination with an operating business, if at all.

     Net Income(Loss). Net income, including a cash refund for franchise fees of $110,000, was $17,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to a net loss of $99,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     As of December 31, 2009, we had cash of approximately $122,000 and total liabilities of approximately $243,000. On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000 which is being used for working capital. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares. On February 4, 2008, we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000, which we are using for working capital.

     We intend to continue devoting substantially all of our time to identifying merger or acquisition candidates. In the event we locate an acceptable operating business, we intend to effect the transaction utilizing any combination of our Common Stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources that we reasonably believe are available. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to consummate a merger or acquisition of an operating business on terms favorable to us, if at all, or that other funding sources will be available. If such shares of Common Stock are issued, our stockholders will experience a dilution of their ownership interest. If a substantial number of shares of common stock are issued in connection with a business combination, a change in control may occur.

Discussion of Cash Flows

     Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $71,000 compared to net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 of $119,000 due to the cash refund received of approximately $110,000 in 2009.

     Net cash provided by investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $6,000 in the year ended December 31, 2008.

     Net cash provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2009 was $50,000 as compared to $113,000 of net cash provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2008. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2009 and 2008 related to proceeds from sale of common stock.

Liquidity Sources

     Our current source of liquidity consists of cash on hand and sale of securities. As of December 31, 2009, we had $122,000 of cash on hand.

     Until required for other purposes, our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in deposit accounts or highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.

     We had previously borrowed from Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board of Directors the net sum of $525,000. We issued to Mr. Lipton an 8% promissory note in exchange for the funds (the “Note”). Under the Note, $525,000 plus all interest was repayable by the Company upon the earlier to occur of (a) January 16, 2010; or (ii) the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. Our repayment obligation under the Note was secured by all of the Company’s assets. We used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for working capital purposes, including payment of our existing liabilities. As of April 14, 2008, we were informed by Alan Lipton that he had released us from repaying all amounts we owed to him under the Note.

     On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     On February 4, 2008 we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to three investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board, and Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     We may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy our future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities.

Contractual Obligations

     As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this section.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

Outstanding Stock Options

     As of December 31, 2009, we had outstanding vested options to purchase approximately 26,000 shares of common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $24.48 per share. We have no outstanding unvested options. The per share value of each share of common stock underlying the vested options, based on the difference between the weighted average exercise price per option and the estimated fair market value of the shares ranges from $0 to $16.25 per share.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 1 to our financial statements included in this report, we believe the policies discussed below are the most critical to understanding our financial position and results of operations.

Income Taxes

     We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets since we have determined that it is more likely than not that we may not be able to realize our deferred tax asset in the future.

Recent Accounting Developments

     In February 2010, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective upon issuance. The adoption of ASU 2010-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-06 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

     In December 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-17,Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities , which replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the

right to receive benefits from the entity. ASU 2009-17 also requires additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. ASU 2009-17 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-17 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

     In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In June 2009, FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which establishes the Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. Following this statement, FASB will not issue new standards in the form of statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (1) update the Codification; (2) provide background information about the guidance; and (3) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. ASC 105 was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In April 2009, FASB issued amendments to ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which provides amendments to guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent and provides additional authoritative guidance in determining whether a market is active or inactive and whether a transaction is distressed. The amendments are applied to all assets and liabilities (i.e., financial and non-financial) and requires enhanced disclosures. The amendments are effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the ASC 820-10 amendments did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 requires an entity to measure a business acquired at fair value and to recognize goodwill attributable to any noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) rather than just the portion attributable to the acquirer. ASC 805 also results in fewer exceptions to the principle of measuring assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at fair value. In addition, ASC 805 requires payments to third parties for consulting, legal, audit, and similar services associated with an acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather than capitalized as part of the business combination.

Also in December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). ASC 810 requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. The Company simultaneously adopted ASC 805 and ASC 810 as of January 1, 2009, as required. These standards will have no impact on the previous acquisitions recorded by the Company in the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item 7A.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     See the list of financial statements filed with this report under Item 15 below.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

     None.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Amerisa Kornblum, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

     Due to the material weakness (discussed below in subsection c of this Item), our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2009 to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods and that such information is accumulated and disclosed appropriately.

     Notwithstanding this material weakness, we believe that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods and dates presented.

     b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

     Our management has determined that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

     c. Management Report On Internal Control Over Reporting.

     Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

     Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment using those criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2009 because we create, review and process financial data without internal independent review.

     Since January 2007, Amerisa Kornblum began to serve as both our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer whereas prior to that date, Ms. Kornblum was the Chief Financial Officer. Commencing January 1, 2007, we have observed that, although our operations subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2006 are limited, we have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting in that we create, review and process financial data without internal independent review due to our not having sufficient personnel. Due to this material weakness, there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our financial statements could occur and not be detected, prevented or corrected. Notwithstanding this material weakness, we believe that the financial statements included in this Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods and dates presented.

     This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

     None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     The following table sets forth our executive officer and each Class I director, Class II director, and Class III director, their ages and present positions with Odimo as of March 20, 2009.

Name		Age				Position
Alan Lipton			59			Chairman of the Board, Class III Director
Amerisa Kornblum			48			Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Sidney Feltenstein(1)			69			Class III Director
Stanley Stern(2)			52			Class I Director
Steven Tishman(3)			53			Class II Director

     Alan Lipton has been our Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 2004 and a member of our Board of Directors since November 1999. From November 1999 through May 11, 2006, Mr. Lipton was our Chief Executive Officer and President. From 1983 to 1994 Mr. Lipton was the Chief Executive Officer of Jan Bell Marketing, Inc., which was a publicly held watch and jewelry retailer and supplier to wholesale price clubs. After retiring from Jan Bell Marketing in 1994, Mr. Lipton founded the Lipton Foundation, a philanthropic organization. From 1994 to the present, Mr. Lipton has been involved with the Lipton Foundation and in various real estate development projects in South Florida.

     Amerisa Kornblum has been our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since November 1999, our Secretary since November 2005 and our Chief Executive Officer since January 2007. From October 1997 to November 1999, Ms. Kornblum served as Chief Financial Officer of Gold Coast Media, Inc. From 1994 through 1997, Ms. Kornblum was a financial systems consultant, for various catalog and retail companies. From 1988 to 1993, Ms. Kornblum worked for Jan Bell Marketing, Inc. in various capacities, including Controller, Director of Internal Audit, and Director of Investor Relations. From 1985 to 1988, Ms. Kornblum was a senior auditor for Deloitte & Touche LLP. Ms. Kornblum is a certified public accountant in the State of Florida. Ms. Kornblum is married to Jeff Kornblum, our former President and Chief Executive Officer.

     Sidney Feltenstein has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2004. Mr. Feltenstein currently is a private investor. From June 2006 through February 2008, Mr. Feltenstein was the Chairman of Sagittarius Brands, a restaurant holding company. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Feltenstein served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Yorkshire Global Restaurants, an operator of A&W Restaurants and Long John Silver’s restaurants. Mr. Feltenstein has served in a variety of operations and marketing management positions in the restaurant business including Chief Marketing Officer for Dunkin Donuts and Executive President of Worldwide Marketing for Burger King Corporation. Mr. Feltenstein is active in various organizations, including the International Franchise Association. From 2003 through 2007, Mr. Feltenstein was a director of BUCA, Inc., a publicly traded restaurant company.

     Stanley Stern was a member of our Board of Directors from November 1999 through May 2004 and rejoined the Board in February 2005. Since March 2004, Mr. Stern has been a Managing Director and head of investment banking

with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm. From February 2002 to March 2004, Mr. Stern served as a Managing Director and head of investment banking with C.E. Unterberg, Towbin, an investment banking firm. From January 2000 to February 2002, Mr. Stern served as Managing Director of STI Ventures Advisory USA Inc. and as a member of the board of directors and the investment committee of STI Ventures. Mr. Stern also serves as the chairman of the board of Tucows, Inc., and is a director of Fundtech, a provider of financial payment processing solutions.

     Steven Tishman has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2005. Since October 2002, he has been a Managing Director of Rothschild Inc., a merchant banking firm. From November 1999 to July 2002, Mr. Tishman was a Managing Director of Robertson Stephens, Inc., an investment banking firm. Mr. Tishman is also a director of Cedar Fair, L.P., an operator of amusement parks.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership with the SEC. Reporting persons are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. These reports are available for review on our website at www.odimo.com. Based solely on a review of these reports, we believe that all directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements for 2009.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

     Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees, in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and the Nasdaq Rules. Upon written request to our Corporate Secretary, Odimo Incorporated , 9858 Clint Moore Road, Boca Raton, Fl , we will provide, without charge, any person with a copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics.

Audit Committee Financial Experts

     Our Board of Directors has determined that both Mr. Tishman and Mr. Feltenstein satisfy the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as promulgated by the SEC by virtue of their educational and work experience as described above and are both independent from our executive officers in accordance with the definition of “independence” as promulgated by the American Stock Exchange.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     Since January 2007, Amerisa Kornblum has been our only executive officer. From January 2007 through December 2007, we paid Ms. Kornblum $2,500 per month. Commencing January 2008, Ms. Kornblum agreed to continue to serve in her capacity as our sole executive officer for no compensation. Since January 2007, Ms. Kornblum has served us as our sole executive officer with no written employment agreement. Due to our severely limited resources we are unable to attract other executive talent and we are unable to offer any compensation to Ms. Kornblum. While we have, in the past and may in the future grant stock options as a means to attract and provide equity incentives to executives, no options have been granted since 2004 and all options that have heretofore been granted to prior executive officers have been cancelled.

     Amerisa Kornblum, our sole executive officer (the “Named Executive”) was paid no compensation and no amounts were accrued for her services during 2008 and 2009.

Stock Options /Equity Awards

     No stock options or equity awards were granted, exercised or outstanding in favor of any of the Named Executive during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Pension Benefits

     We do not have any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with, retirement.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

     We do not have any plan that provides for deferred compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

     We have not implemented stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

     As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this section.

Director Compensation

     We do not pay directors compensation but have in the past, reimbursed directors for certain expenses incurred by them in connection with their duties to the Company.

Communications with Directors

     Stockholders may communicate with our Board of Directors or one or more directors by sending a letter addressed to our Board or to any one or more directors in care of our Corporate Secretary, Odimo Incorporated, 9858 Clint Moore Road, Boca Raton, Fl, in an envelope clearly marked “Stockholder Communication.” Our Corporate Secretary’s office will forward such correspondence unopened to Mr. Feltenstein or Mr. Tishman, or another independent director as the Board of Directors may specify from time to time, unless the envelope specifies that it should be delivered to another director. If multiple communications are received on a similar topic, our Corporate Secretary may, in her discretion, forward only representative correspondence.

Compensation Committee Report

     As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this section.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     The following table sets forth, as of March 19, 2010, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Odimo’s Common Stock by (i) each stockholder known by Odimo to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Odimo’s Common Stock, (ii) each director of Odimo, (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table above, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of Odimo as a group. This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC.

     Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them and their address is our address.

     Applicable percentage ownership in the following table is based on 11,086,575 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 19, 2010.

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

		Shares
		Beneficially
Beneficial Owner		Owned				Percentage
5% STOCKHOLDERS
ELAO, LLC(1)			3,096,058				27.93	%
c/o Alan Lipton
Lily Maya Lipton Family Trust (1) c/o Alan Lipton, Trustee			4,274,629				38.56	%
Relao 2, LLC(4) c/o Charles Rennert 100 SE 2 nd Street 2900 Miami Fl 33131			1,178,571				10.63	%
Bruce Galloway(3) Gary Herman (3) c/o Galloway Capital Management, LLC 720 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10019			2,593,227				23.39	%
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Alan Lipton(1)(2)			4,274,629				38.56	%
Amerisa Kornblum(4)			178,571				1.6	%
Stanley Stern			4,000				*
Sidney Feltenstein			—				—
Steven Tishman			—				—
All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons)			4,281,127				38.62	%

Changes In Control

     We are not aware of any arrangement that might result in a change of control in the future.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     We had previously borrowed from Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board of Directors the net sum of $525,000. We issued to Mr. Lipton an 8% promissory note in exchange for the funds (the “Note”). Under the Note, $525,000 plus all interest was repayable by the Company upon the earlier to occur of (a) January 16, 2010; or (ii) the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. Our repayment obligation under the Note was secured by all of the Company’s assets. We used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for working capital purposes, including payment of our existing liabilities. As of April 14, 2008, we were informed by Alan Lipton that he had released us from repaying all amounts we owed to him under the Note.

     On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares. On February 4, 2008 we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to three investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board and Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     We may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy our future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities.

     Our audit committee is charged with monitoring and reviewing issues involving potential conflicts of interests and reviewing and approving all related party transactions. In general, for purposes of the Company’s written policy, a related party transaction is a transaction, or a material amendment to any such transaction, involving a related party and the Company involving $120,000 or more. Our policy required the audit committee to review and approve related party transactions. In reviewing and approving any related party transaction or material amendment to any such transaction, the audit committee must satisfy itself that it has been fully informed as to the related party’s relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction and as to the material facts of the transaction, and must determine that the related party transaction is fair to the Company.

Director Independence

     The board of directors has determined that, with the exception of Alan Lipton, the Chairman of our board of directors, all of the members of our board are “independent directors” as that term is defined in the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange. Such independence definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not an employee of the company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the company. In addition, as further required by the American Stock Exchange listing standards, the board of directors has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the board of directors,

would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     We retained Rachlin, LLP, to act as our independent registered public accounting firm during our fiscal year 2009. On June 1, 2009, Rachlin, LLP, (“Rachlin”), merged with and into Marcum, LLP, and began practicing in Florida as“MarcumRachlin, a division of Marcum, LLP” (“MarcumRachlin“or “Rachlin”). Accordingly, effective June 1, 2009, Rachlin ceased to act as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and MarcumRachlin became the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm through the balance of our fiscal year 2009 and has been retained as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year 2010. This change in the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was accepted by the Audit committee of the Company’ Board of Directors.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

     The following table sets forth fees billed to us by MarcumRachlin for services provided during the period for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

		2009				2008
Audit Fees		$	25,000			$	44,000
Audit Related Fees			0				0
Tax Fees			0				0
All Other Fees			0				0
Total		$	25,000			$	44,000

     Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of Odimo’s consolidated financial statements and review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by its independent registered accounting firms in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

     Audit-Related Fees. Odimo did not incur any additional fees under this category.

     Tax Fees. Odimo did not incur any additional fees under this category.

     All Other Fees. Odimo did not incur any additional fees under this category.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies And Procedures

     The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. These services may include audit services, audit-related services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. Management is required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accountants in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. During fiscal year 2009, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

     (a) Documents filed as part of this report.

     1. The following financial statements of Odimo Incorporated and Report of MarcumRachlin independent registered public accounting firm, are included in this report:

		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Balance Sheets		F-2
Statements of Operations		F-3
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		F-4
Statements of Cash Flows		F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6

     2. Financial statement schedule:

     None.

     3. List of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. See part (b) below.

     (b) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:

Exhibit Number		Description
2.1 (1)		Asset Purchase Agreement among registrant and Ashford.com, Inc. dated December 6, 2002
3.1 (1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Bylaws
4.1 (1)		Form of Specimen Stock Certificate
4.2.1 (1)		Investors’ Rights Agreement dated November 18, 1999 by and between the registrant and certain holders of the registrant’s capital stock
4.2.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated March 30, 2004 by and between the registrant and certain holders of the registrant’s capital stock
10.1.1 (1)		Odimo Incorporated Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan
10.1.2 (1)		Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Odimo Incorporated Stock Incentive Plan
10.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 between the registrant and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.3.1 (1)		Promissory Note dated December 6, 2002 by the registrant in favor of GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc.
10.3.2 (1)		Security Agreement dated December 6, 2002 between the registrant and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., as assignee
10.3.3 (1)		Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Licenses Security Agreement dated December 6, 2002 between the registrant and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., as assignee
10.4.1 (1)		Lease Agreement dated December 14, 1999 between the registrant and MDR Fitness Corp.
10.4.2 (1)		Lease Amendment and Extension Agreement dated January 8, 2003 between the registrant and MDR Fitness Corp.
10.5.1 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Alan Lipton
10.5.2 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Jeff Kornblum
10.5.3 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Amerisa Kornblum
10.5.4 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and George Grous
10.5.5 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Alan Lipton

Exhibit Number		Description
10.5.6 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Jeff Kornblum
10.5.7 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Amerisa Kornblum
10.5.8 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and George Grous
10.5.9 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Michael Dell’Arciprete
10.5.1 (1)		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 27, 2004 between the registrant and Alan Lipton
10.6 (1)		Form of Indemnification Agreement between the registrant and each of its directors and executive officers
10.7 (1)		Supply Agreement dated March 30, 2004 between the registrant and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.8.1 (1)		Loan and Security Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.8.2 (1)		Revolving Promissory Note dated as of July 31, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.8.3 (1)		Intellectual Property Security Agreements dated as of July 31, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by each of the registrant and Ashford.com, Inc.
10.8.4 (1)		Unconditional Guaranties dated as of July 31, 2004 of Softbank Capital LP, Softbank Capital Partners LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.9 (1)		Commercial Lease dated as of January 1, 2006 between the registrant and IBB Realty, LLC
10.10 (1)		First Loan Modification Agreement dated as of November 13, 2004 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.11 (1)		First Amended and Restated Note dated as of November 13, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.12 (1)		Amendment and Reaffirmation of Guaranty dated as of November 13, 2004 of Softbank Capital, LP, Softbank Capital Partners, LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.13 (1)		Second Loan Modification Agreement dated as of January 7, 2005 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.14 (1)		Second Amended and Restated Note dated as of January 7, 2005 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.15 (1)		Second Amendment and Reaffirmation of Guaranty dated as of January 7, 2005 of Softbank Capital, L.P., Softbank Capital Partners, LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.16 (1)		Confirmation letter dated January 7, 2005 from Softbank Capital Partners LP, regarding financial support.
10.17 (5)		Termination Agreement dated March 29, 2006 by and between Odimo Incorporated and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.18 (5)		Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated March 30, 2006, by and among Silicon Valley Bank, Odimo Incorporated, Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.19 (6)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006 by and among Ice.com, Inc., Ice Diamond, LLC, and Odimo Incorporated.
10.20 (6)		Transition Services Agreement dated as of this May 11, 2006, by and between Ice Diamond, LLC, Ice.com, Inc., and Odimo Incorporated.
10.21 (6)		Separation Agreement dated May 11, 2006 by Odimo Incorporated and Alan Lipton.
10.22 (6)		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Contract dated as of May 11, 2006, by and among Odimo Incorporated and Jeffrey Kornblum.
10.23 (7)		Modification and Settlement Agreement dated November 6, 2006 by and between IBB Realty, LLC and Odimo Incorporated.
10.24 (8)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 by and among Odimo Incorporated, Worldofwatches.com, Inc. and ILS Holdings, LLC.
10.25 (9)		Separation Agreement dated as of January 16, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and Jeff Kornblum.
10.26 (9)		Separation Agreement dated as of January 16, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and George Grous.
10.27 (9)		Termination Agreement dated as of January 15, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and Amerisa Kornblum.
10.30 (11)		8% Secured Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $300,000

Exhibit Number		Description
10.31 (11)		Amended and Restated 8% Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $500,000
10.32 (11)		8% Demand Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $30,000
10.33 (10)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 6, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated, Ashford.com, Inc. and Luxi Group, LLC.
10.34 (12)		Amended and Restated 8% Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $525,000
14.1 (2)		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
16.1 (3)		Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated September 2, 2005
16.2 (3)		Letter of Rachlin Cohen & Holtz LLP dated September 2, 2005
21.1 (1)		Subsidiaries of Odimo Incorporated
23.1 (4)		Consent of MarcumRachlin
31.1 (4)		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2 (4)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1 (4)		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 (4)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-117400) originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2004, as amended thereafter, and is incorporated herein by reference.
(2)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(3)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated August 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2005 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(4)		Filed herewith.
(5)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(6)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated May 11, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(7)		This exhibit was previously filed as and exhibit to the Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(8)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated December 1, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 4, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(9)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated January 11, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated April 11, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(11)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(12)		This exhibit was previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name		Title		Date
/s/ Amerisa Kornblum   Amerisa Kornblum		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ( Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer )		March 29, 2010
/s/ Alan Lipton   Alan Lipton		Chairman of the Board of Directors		March 29, 2010
/s/ Sidney Feltenstein   Sidney Feltenstein		Director		March 29, 2010
/s/ Stanley Stern   Stanley Stern		Director		March 29, 2010
/s/ Steven Tishman   Steven Tishman		Director		March 29, 2010

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Odimo Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Odimo Incorporated (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Odimo Incorporated, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations and, as of December 31, 2009, reflects a significant working capital deficiency and a stockholders’ deficiency. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MarcumRachlin, a division of Marcum LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 29, 2010

Odimo, Incorporated

BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value)

		December 31,				December 31,
		2009				2008
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash		$	122			$	1
Prepaid expense and other current assets			—				4
Total		$	122			$	5
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	240			$	246
Note payable to related party			3				3
Total current liabilities		$	243			$	249
Commitments, Contingencies and Subsequent Events
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50 million shares authorized, none issued and outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300 million shares authorized, 11,086 and 7,753 shares issued and outstanding			10				7
Additional paid-in capital			104,527				104,424
Accumulated deficit			(104,658	)			(104,675	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)			(121	)			(244	)
Total		$	122			$	5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Odimo, Incorporated

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2009				2008
Revenues		$	—			$	—
Operating expenses			(17	)			105
Total operating expenses			(17	)			105
Income (Loss) from Operations			17				(105	)
Other Income (Expense):
Gain on sale of assets			—				6
Net Income (Loss)		$	17			$	(99	)
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic and diluted		$	0.00			$	(0.01	)
Weighted Average Number of Shares:
Basic and diluted			10,539				7,687

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Odimo, Incorporated

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
(in thousands, except per share data)

										Additional								Total
		Common Stock								Paid-In				Accumulated				Stockholders’
		Shares				Par Value				Capital				Deficit				Equity (Deficiency)
BALANCE — December 31, 2007			7,039			$	7			$	103,705			$	(104,576	)		$	(864	)
Sale of common stock			714				—				100				—				100
Forgiveness of note payable and accrued interest to related party			—				—				563				—				563
Credit arising from services contributed by related parties			—				—				56				—				56
Net loss			—				—				—				(99	)			(99	)
BALANCE — December 31, 2008			7,753				7				104,424				(104,675	)			(244	)
Sale of common stock			3,333				3				47				—				50
Credit arising from services contributed by related parties			—				—				56				—				56
Net income			—				—				—				17				17
BALANCE — December 31, 2009			11,086			$	10			$	104,527			$	(104,658	)		$	(121	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Odimo Incorporated

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2009				2008
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)		$	17			$	(99	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Charge in lieu of compensation contributed by officer and related party			56				56
Gain on sale of assets							(6	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			4				13
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable			(6	)			(68	)
Accrued liabilities			—				(15	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			71				(119	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sale of assets, net of expenses			—				6
Net cash provided by investing activities			—				6
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes payable to related party, net of repayments							13
Proceeds from sale of common stock			50				100
Net cash provided by financing activities			50				113
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents			121				—
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning			1				1
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Ending		$	122				1
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		$	—			$	—
Forgiveness of note payable to related party		$	—			$	563

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ODIMO INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business — The Company is a non-operating public shell company. The Company is seeking suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company previously was an online retailer of watches, luxury goods, diamonds and jewelry through three websites, www.diamond.com, www.ashford.com and www.worldofwatches.com. The Company’s operating results disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10 K are not meaningful to its future results.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

General and Administrative Expenses — General and administrative expenses include professional fees, insurance, rent, and other general corporate expenses.

Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is recognized with respect to all temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and with respect to the benefit from utilizing tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is prohibited or uncertain.

Income (Loss) Per Share — Basic loss per share is computed based on the average number of common shares outstanding and diluted earnings per share is computed based on the average number of common and potential common shares outstanding under the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted loss per share was the same as the basic loss per share for each period presented since the inclusion of potential common stock in the computation would be antidilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     In February 2010, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-09,Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements , which amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective upon issuance. The adoption of ASU 2010-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-06 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-06 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

     In December 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-17,Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities , which replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. ASU 2009-17 also

ODIMO INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements

requires additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. ASU 2009-17 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-17 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

     In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-05,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In June 2009, FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which establishes the Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. Following this statement, FASB will not issue new standards in the form of statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (1) update the Codification; (2) provide background information about the guidance; and (3) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. ASC 105 was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     In April 2009, FASB issued amendments to ASC 820-10,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which provides amendments to guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent and provides additional authoritative guidance in determining whether a market is active or inactive and whether a transaction is distressed. The amendments are applied to all assets and liabilities (i.e., financial and non-financial) and requires enhanced disclosures. The amendments are effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the ASC 820-10 amendments did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 requires an entity to measure a business acquired at fair value and to recognize goodwill attributable to any noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) rather than just the portion attributable to the acquirer. ASC 805 also results in fewer exceptions to the principle of measuring assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at fair value. In addition, ASC 805 requires payments to third parties for consulting, legal, audit, and similar services associated with an acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather than capitalized as part of the business combination.

Also in December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). ASC 810 requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. The Company simultaneously adopted ASC 805 and ASC 810 as of January 1, 2009, as required. These standards will have no impact on the previous acquisitions recorded by the Company in the Company’s financial statements.

2. GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS AND LIQUIDITY

The Company is a non-operating public shell company and is seeking suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy its future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. The Company’s plans to repay its liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by its inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy its liabilities.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s report on its financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in its historical financial statements, the Company has incurred significant recurring net losses for the past several years and as of December 31, 2009, its financial statements reflected negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the registered public accounting firm’s report states that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As of December 31, 2009 the Company had borrowed from Alan Lipton, its Chairman of the Board of Directors the sum of $3,000. The Company used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for payment of its existing liabilities. During the year ended December

ODIMO INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements

31, 2009, the Company raised an additional $50,000 from existing stockholders for working capital purposes. In addition, during the third quarter, the Company received a refund of its franchise taxes of approximately $112,000.

3. STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Company adopted its employee stock option plan in 1999. The Plan was amended in April 2004 and renamed the Odimo Incorporated Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and reserved for issuance an aggregate of 559,391 shares under the Plan. The Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors, which has discretion over who will receive awards, the type of the awards, the number of shares awarded, and the vesting terms of the awards. Options granted under the Plan generally vest ratably over the vesting period, which is generally 3 years. Vested options expire 2 to 10 years after vesting. Once vested, the options become exercisable upon the occurrence of a “realization” event (i.e., an IPO, merger, etc.) as defined in the Plan. Upon either an involuntary or voluntary termination of employment, vested options are not forfeited, and must be exercised within three months after a “realization” event. Options granted under the Plan are generally granted at fair value on the date of the grant. The Company has historically determined the fair value of its shares through the consideration of previous sales of shares to third parties and independent appraisals.

There were no stock options granted to non-employees during 2009 and 2008.

The stock option transactions related to the Plan are summarized as follows (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price) for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

		December 31, 2009								December 31, 2008
						Weighted Average								Weighted Average
		Options				Exercise Price				Options				Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year			26			$	24.48				26			$	24.48
Granted			—				—				—				—
Exercised			—				—				—				—
Outstanding at December 31, 2009			26			$	24.48				26			$	24.48
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009			26			$	24.48				26			$	24.48

The weighted average remaining life of outstanding stock options is 2 years.

4. INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of the statutory Federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands, except tax rates):

		2009								2008
		Amount				Rate				Amount				Rate
Income taxes at statutory rate		$	6				34.0	%		$	(24	)			34.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit			1				3.6				(3	)			3.6
Increase in taxes:
Penalties and fines			—				0.0				—				0.0	)
Meals and entertainment			—				0.0				—				0.0
Adjustment of deferred balances			—				0.0				—	)			0.0
Valuation allowance			(7	)			(37.6	)			27				(37.6	)
		$	—				—	%		$	—				—	%

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $78.2 million as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards will expire beginning in 2019 through 2028. Because it is not more likely than not that sufficient tax

ODIMO INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements

earnings will be generated to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards, a corresponding valuation allowance of approximately $29.4 million and $29.4 million was established as of December 31, 2009, and 2008 respectively. Additionally, under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the amounts of, and benefits from, net operating losses may be limited in certain circumstances, including a change in control.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in its stock ownership. The Company has preliminarily internally reviewed the applicability of the annual limitations imposed by Section 382 caused by changes that occurred prior to, as well as, during the year ended December 31, 2007 in its stock ownership and believe the availability of the net operating loss carryforwards is substantially limited. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the future.

5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note Payable to Related Party — As of December 31, 2009, the Company had borrowed from Alan Lipton, its Chairman of the Board of Directors the sum of $3,000 which bears interest at 4% and is due on demand. The Company used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for payment of its existing liabilities.

Sale of Common Stock —On March 3, 2009 the Company sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in the sale.

On February 4, 2008 the Company sold 714,284 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $.001, to three investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, and Amerisa Kornblum, its President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in the sale.

Services Contributed by Stockholders — During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, certain stockholders rendered professional services to the Company. A charge in lieu of compensation for the estimated fair value of the services rendered by the officer and the related party ($56,000) has been charged to expense together with a credit to additional paid in capital in the accompanying financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

6. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued. No events required disclosure.