Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND LLC | v178733_ex32.htm |
EX-31.1 - CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND LLC | v178733_ex31-1.htm |
EX-31.2 - CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND LLC | v178733_ex31-2.htm |
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
Form
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
Annual Report pursuant to
section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009
or
|
o
|
Transition report pursuant to
section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
transition period
from to
|
Commission
file number: 000-51868
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(Exact
name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
California
|
33-0827161
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
1920
Main Street, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92614
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
949-852-1007
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class:
|
||
None
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class:
|
||
Units of limited liability company interests |
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filed, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
Accelerated
filer
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
¨
|
¨
|
¨
|
x
|
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act): Yes o No x
The
aggregate market value of the units of membership interest held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $34,770,400 as of the last business day of
the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2009)
based upon the estimated liquidation value of the Registrant’s assets, as
determined by the managing member.
Documents
incorporated by reference. None.
PART
I
SPECIAL
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including
estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives
and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements
are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These
forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,”
“project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,”
“may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and
similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which
may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our expectations will be
realized.
Factors
which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations
include, but are not limited to:
|
·
|
Continuation of the credit
crisis;
|
|
·
|
National and local economic and
business conditions;
|
|
·
|
General and local real estate
conditions;
|
|
·
|
The impairment in the value of
real property due to general and local real estate
conditions;
|
|
·
|
Changes in federal, state and
local governmental laws and regulations
and
|
|
·
|
The availability of and costs
associated with sources of
liquidity.
|
A
detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking
statements is included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this
report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
As used
in this report, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC
except where the context otherwise requires.
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Overview
Cornerstone
Realty Fund, LLC is a California limited liability company (the “Fund”) that was
formed in October of 1998 to invest in multi-tenant business parks catering to
small business tenants. Our properties are located in major metropolitan areas
in the United States and are owned on an all cash basis without debt financing.
Our
managing member is Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC (“CIP”), a California
limited liability company. CIP is managed by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. is an experienced real estate operating company
specializing in the acquisition, operation and repositioning of multi-tenant
industrial business parks.
On August
7, 2001, we commenced a public offering of units of our membership interest
pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. On August 18, 2005,
we completed our public offering of these units. As of that date, we had issued
100,000 units to unit holders for gross offering proceeds of $50,000,000, before
discounts of $39,780.
Description
of Business
We are a
real estate fund that seeks return on our investments through the acquisition,
management and sale of multi-tenant industrial business parks. We have purchased
and operate a diversified portfolio of six existing leased multi-tenant
industrial business parks catering to the small business tenant.
Our
properties are located in major metropolitan areas in the United States. These
are geographic areas nationwide that have historically demonstrated strong
levels of demand for rental space by tenants requiring small industrial
buildings. We have properties located in the Los Angeles, Chicago and Phoenix
areas.
2
We have
acquired only completed properties that generate current income from rental
operations. Our strategy has been to acquire such properties at prices below
what our managing member estimates to be the new development cost of a similar
property located within the same competitive geographic area. In stabilized
market areas with high tenant demand, a tenant with an expiring lease may not be
able to find a competitive space to rent, causing rental rates and property
values to rise to the levels necessary to justify the construction of
competitive properties. If this occurs, we could experience financial gain as a
result of having purchased properties at prices below their new development
cost.
Multi-Tenant
Business Parks
Multi-tenant
business parks comprise one of the major segments of the commercial real estate
market on a nationwide basis. These properties contain a large number of
diversified tenants and differ from large warehouse and manufacturing buildings
that rely on a single tenant. Multi-tenant business parks are ideal for small
businesses that require both office and warehouse space. This combination of
office and warehouse space cannot generally be met in other commercial property
types. Multi-tenant business park tenants come from a broad spectrum of
industries including light manufacturing, assembly, distribution, import/export,
general contractors, telecommunications, computer technology, general
office/warehouse, wholesale, service, high-tech and other fields. Leasing
activity is typically diversified, with smaller-sized tenants. These properties
diversify revenue by generating rental income from multiple businesses instead
of relying on one or two large tenants.
The
properties we have acquired cater to the small business tenant and have lease
terms ranging from one to five years. During economic conditions when rental
rates are rising rapidly, the short-term leases should allow us to increase
rental income at a faster rate than properties with longer-term
leases.
One of
the most attractive features of multi-tenant business parks is the ability to
adapt to changing market conditions and to meet the diversification needs of
small business tenants. A multi-tenant business park is the first home for many
small businesses. In good economic times, new businesses are forming and
existing businesses are growing. Multi-tenant business parks can accommodate
this growth with a tenant’s expansion into multiple units. In difficult economic
times such as those currently being experienced, a tenant’s space requirements
often contracts, and tenants who previously outgrew their space in a
multi-tenant business park may move back. Accordingly multi-tenant industrial
park space is in demand in both growing and declining economies.
Investment
Strategy
Cornerstone
Ventures, Inc. specializes in and has substantial operating experience investing
in and operating multi-tenant business parks, offering in-depth real estate
expertise through an experienced team of industry professionals with extensive
understanding of industrial real estate.
Our
investment strategy has been to purchase properties in major industrial markets
with considerable tenant demand. We acquired properties in areas with strong
tenant demand and a large base of existing industrial properties, a high
population of small business tenants and substantial competitive barriers to
entry.
Our
strategy has involved purchasing multi-tenant business parks at prices below
replacement cost. Such opportunities may exist where rental rates at properties
configured for the small business tenant are below the levels necessary to
justify the development of new projects.
We
regularly conduct portfolio property reviews and, if appropriate, we make
determinations to dispose of properties that we do not believe meet our
strategic criteria based on economic, market and other
circumstances.
Although
the economic downturn that accelerated in the second half of 2008 and into 2009
had increased overall vacancy in multi tenant industrial properties, well
located properties are still experiencing some rental rate increases due to
demand. Properties serving the needs of the small industrial business tenant are
operating at or near capacity in many markets, and rental rates in these markets
are expected to rise to the point where development of new space is justified.
Compared to single-user industrial properties that typically have longer lease
terms, the shorter-term multi-tenant business park leases allow for greater
opportunities to increase rents and maximize revenue growth in upward trending
markets. Our investment strategy has been to purchase and reposition properties
and capitalize on shorter lease terms, rising rents, increasing cash flow and
capital appreciation.
Our
portfolio is comprised of multi-tenant properties serving the small business
tenant in three major metropolitan markets. The highest dollar amount we have
invested in any single property is $9.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, we had
purchased a total of seven properties for an aggregate investment of
approximately $37.5 million. On April 16, 2007, we sold one of our properties to
an unaffiliated third party for gross proceeds of $3.2 million. We do not expect
to acquire additional properties.
3
Property
Features
Land: Lot sizes for our
properties range from approximately 1.6 to 5.0 acres depending upon the number
of buildings and building sizes. Individual buildings contained in any specific
property may be located on a single parcel of land or on multiple parcels of
land depending upon the configuration and layout of the entire project. Sites
are zoned for industrial, commercial and/or office uses depending on local
governmental regulations. The location of each property is an important factor
in its future value. We have purchased properties in what we considered to be in
prime locations.
Buildings: The buildings
comprising our properties are generally rectangular in shape and constructed
utilizing concrete tilt up construction methods and in some cases brick and
mortar methods. Building sizes range from 30,000 to 86,000 square feet divided
into leasable unit sizes ranging from approximately 100 square feet to 20,000
square feet. Generally our buildings include the following
features:
|
·
|
Functional site plan offering
ample tenant parking and good truck and car
circulation;
|
|
·
|
Multiple truck doors with ground
level and dock high loading;
|
|
·
|
Ceiling clear heights in each
tenant space from 14 feet to 24
feet;
|
|
·
|
Attractive front entry and
visibility with a location for tenant’s address and
sign;
|
|
·
|
Quality office improvements
including private offices, restrooms and reception
area;
|
|
·
|
Minimum of 100 amps of electrical
service;
|
|
·
|
Heating, ventilating and air
conditioning systems for the office area;
and
|
|
·
|
Fire sprinklers where required by
local governmental agencies.
|
Property
Selection
The
experienced staff of our managing member were responsible for the selection and
evaluation of properties that we acquired. The acquisition process was performed
by our managing member with no acquisition fees payable by us to our managing
member. All property acquisitions were evaluated by our managing member based
upon its experience in the area of multi-tenant business parks and our
investment objectives and supported by appraisals prepared by a competent
independent appraiser.
The
Asset Management Function
Asset
management includes preparation, implementation, supervision and monitoring of a
business plan specifically designed for each property. Our managing member
performs the following asset management services for us:
|
·
|
Creates and implements an
individualized plan for enhancing the profitability and value of each
property;
|
|
·
|
Supervises the day-to-day
operations of property managers assigned to each
property;
|
|
·
|
Selects and supervises the
on-going marketing efforts of leasing agents responsible for marketing the
property to prospective
tenants;
|
|
·
|
Coordinates semi-annual rental
surveys of competitive projects in the local geographic area — this
function is designed to maintain the property at the highest possible
rental rates allowable in the market where the property is
located;
|
|
·
|
Approves lease terms negotiated
by leasing agents with new tenants and tenants renewing their leases —
this includes making sure that lease rates being attained are in line with
market conditions as well as in line with the then current operating plan
for the property;
|
|
·
|
Reviews and approves any capital
improvements necessary at the property, including tenant improvements
necessary to lease space;
|
|
·
|
Reviews
monthly financial reports prepared by property managers with a focus on
improving the cost efficiency of operating the
property;
|
4
|
·
|
Prepares annual property
operating budgets for review and approval by senior management;
and
|
|
·
|
Prepares regular updates
regarding operations of the property as compared to budget
estimates.
|
Although
most real estate operating companies charge a separate fee for asset management
services, our managing member does not charge us a separate fee for such
services. However, our managing member is entitled to receive an incentive share
of our net cash flows from operations, as described under Item 13. “Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Property
Management Services
Our
managing member is responsible for providing or obtaining property management
services for our properties and is responsible for overseeing all day-to-day
operations for each property, including the following:
|
·
|
Invoice tenants for monthly
rent;
|
|
·
|
Collect
rents;
|
|
·
|
Pay property level operating
expenses;
|
|
·
|
Solicit bids from vendors for
monthly contract services;
|
|
·
|
Provide property level financial
reports on a monthly basis;
|
|
·
|
Review and comment on annual
property operating budgets;
|
|
·
|
On-going
assessment of potential risks or hazards at the
property;
|
|
·
|
Clean up and prepare vacant units
to be leased;
|
|
·
|
Supervise tenant improvement
construction;
|
|
·
|
Supervise tenant and owner
compliance with lease terms;
|
|
·
|
Supervise tenant compliance with
insurance requirements;
|
|
·
|
Periodically inspect tenant
spaces for lease compliance;
and
|
|
·
|
Respond to tenant
inquiries.
|
Due to
the short-term nature of the tenant leases, as well as the large number of small
business tenants at each property, multi-tenant business parks are management
intensive. For this reason, property management fees for multi-tenant industrial
properties are generally higher than property management fees for other types of
commercial real estate. Our managing member believes that a very high level of
property management service and strict property maintenance standards maximizes
the value of each property. Our managing member may subcontract property
management services with either an affiliate or third party property management
organization. Currently, our properties are managed under subcontracts with CB
Richard Ellis, Inc., Essex Realty Management, Inc. and Corporate Facility
Services Inc. none of which are affiliated with us or with our managing
member.
Government
Regulations
The
properties we own are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Federal laws
such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Federal Clean Air
Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Emergency Planning and Community
Right to Know Act and the Hazard Communication Act govern such matters as
wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground
and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and
disposal of solid and hazardous materials and the remediation of contamination
associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations impose joint and
several liabilities on tenants, owners or operators for the costs to investigate
or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts
causing the contamination were legal. Compliance with these laws and any new or
more stringent laws or regulations may require us to incur material
expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material
environmental liability. In addition, there are various federal, state and local
fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required
to comply, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages
for noncompliance.
5
Our
properties may be affected by our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of
land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the
presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties.
The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these
substances, may make it difficult or impossible to sell or rent such
property.
Under
various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations,
a current or previous real property owner or operator may be liable for the cost
to remove or remediate hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such
property. These costs could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability
whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the
presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may
impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses
may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or
prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants that may be
impacted by such laws. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for
noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain
circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law
principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to
hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air.
Third parties may seek recovery from real property owners or operators for
personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released
hazardous substances. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of
complying with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any
contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could be
substantial.
We
obtained satisfactory Phase I environmental assessments on each property we
purchased. A Phase I assessment is an inspection and review of the property, its
existing and prior uses, aerial maps and records of government agencies for the
purpose of determining the likelihood of environmental contamination. A Phase I
assessment includes only non-invasive testing. It is possible that all
environmental liabilities were not identified in the Phase I assessments we
obtained or that a prior owner, operator or current occupant has created an
environmental condition which we do not know about. There can be no assurance
that future law, ordinances or regulations will not impose material
environmental liability on us or that the current environmental condition of our
properties will not be affected by our tenants, or by the condition of land or
operations in the vicinity of our properties such as the presence of underground
storage tanks or groundwater contamination.
Competition
We
experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of comparable
projects which may include our managing member and its affiliates. As a result,
we may be required to provide free rent, reduced charges for tenant
improvements, and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on
our results of operations. At the time we elect to dispose of our properties, we
will also be in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate
suitable purchasers.
Employees
and Resources
We have
no direct employees. Employees of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., an affiliate of
our managing member, perform a full range of real estate services including
leasing, property management, accounting, asset management and investor
relations for us. Our managing member may also engage consultants to provide
these services when our managing member deems this to be in our best interest.
See Item 13 — “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a summary of
the types of fees to be paid to our managing member and its affiliates for its
services.
Our
managing member provides us with office space for our operations without
charge.
Available
Information
Information
about us is available on our website (http://www.crefunds.com). We make
available, free of charge, on our Internet website, our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with the SEC. These materials are also available at no cost in print to
any person who requests it by contacting our Investor Services Department at
1920 Main Street, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92614; telephone (877) 805-3333.
Our filings with the SEC are available to the public over the Internet at the
SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may read and copy any filed document at
the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E., Room
1580, Washington D.C. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further
information about the public reference rooms.
6
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
The risks
and uncertainties described below can adversely affect our business, operating
results, prospects and financial condition. These risks and uncertainties could
cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our
forward-looking statements.
Recent
disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could
adversely affect the values of our investments and our ongoing operations.
Disruptions in the capital markets during the past two years have
constrained equity and debt capital available for investment in commercial real
estate, resulting in fewer buyers seeking to acquire commercial properties and
consequent reductions in property values. Furthermore, the current state of the
economy and the implications of future potential weakening may negatively impact
commercial real estate fundamentals and result in lower occupancy, lower rental
rates and declining values in our current portfolio. The current downturn may
impact our tenants’ business operations directly, reducing their ability to pay
base rent, percentage rent or other charges due to us.
The
occurrence of these events could have the following negative effects on
us:
·
|
the values of our investments in
commercial properties could decrease below the amounts we paid for the
investments;
|
·
|
we may not be able to sell our
properties at an attractive price and the time to effect a sale at any
price may be extended; and
|
·
|
revenues from our properties
could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and
potential increases in uncollectible
receivables;
|
These
factors could impair our ability to make distributions to you and decrease the
value of your investment in us.
Financial
markets are still recovering from a period of disruption and recession, and we
are unable to predict if and when the economy will stabilize or improve.
The
financial markets are still recovering from a recession, which created volatile
market conditions, resulted in a decrease in availability of business credit and
led to the insolvency, closure or acquisition of a number of financial
institutions. While the markets showed signs of stabilizing in the end of 2009,
it remains unclear when the economy will fully recover to pre-recession levels.
Continued economic weakness in the U.S. economy generally or a new recession
would likely adversely affect our financial condition and that of our tenants
and could impact the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us.
We may not
generate sufficient cash for distributions. If the cash flow generated by
operation of the properties we own is not sufficient to fully fund
distributions, we may fund distributions from cash reserves, from the proceeds
of a sale of a property or incur financing upon unit holders’ approval. If the
rental revenues from the properties we own do not exceed our operational
expenses, or our cash reserves are depleted or we cannot incur indebtedness, we
will not be able to make cash distributions until such time as we sell a
property.
If our
unit
holders approve a
proposed amendment to our operating agreement, we may incur debt financing to
pay our distributions. We intend to pay our distributions from cash flow
generated by operation of the properties and cash reserves. Currently our
operating agreement does not permit us to incur debt financing to support
distributions to our unit holders. However, if our unit holders approve a
proposed amendment to our operating agreement, our managing member will be
permitted to cause us to incur a limited amount of debt for working capital
purposes and to support cash distributions to unit holders. If we incur debt, we
would be subject to various risks associated with the use of debt financing.
Interest we pay could reduce overall returns to unit holders. Additionally, if
we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our
interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and overall returns to unit
holders. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising
interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments
in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on
such investments and could result in a loss.
We are dependent
upon our managing member and its affiliates to conduct our operations. Any
adverse changes in the financial health of our managing member or its affiliates
or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and the
return on investments in us. We are dependent on our managing member,
Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, to manage our operations and our
portfolio of real estate assets. Our managing member has limited operating
history and it depends upon the fees and other compensation that it receives
from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of our properties
to conduct its operations. To date, the fees we pay to our managing member have
been inadequate to cover its operating expenses. To cover its operational
shortfalls, our managing member has relied on cash raised in private offerings.
A recent FINRA inquiry, which relates to such private offerings, could adversely
affect the success of such private offerings or future private capital-raising
efforts. If our managing member is unable to secure additional capital, it may
become unable to meet its obligations and we might be required to find
alternative service providers, which could result in a significant disruption of
our business and may adversely affect the value of your investment in us.
7
Our managing
member, its affiliates, and its officers also have management responsibilities
to other entities.
Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC and Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. may
have conflicts of interests in allocating management time between us and other
entities. These other entities will purchase, operate and sell the same type of
properties, which we purchase, own and operate. Our managing member, which is
operated by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., may have conflicts of interest in
deciding whether or not to sell a property since the interest of our managing
member and the interests of our unit holders may differ as a result of their
financial and tax position and the compensation to which our managing member or
affiliates may be entitled to receive upon the sale of a property.
Our
managing member and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation based
upon the property we own and the sale of our properties and therefore our
managing and its affiliates may make recommendations to us that we hold or sell
property in order to increase their compensation. Our managing member will have
considerable discretion with respect to the terms and timing of our disposition
and leasing transactions. Our
managing member and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation related
to the management of our investments. In some instances our managing member and
its affiliates may benefit by us retaining ownership of our assets, while our
unitholders may be better served by sale or disposition. In other instances they
may benefit by us selling the properties which may entitle our managing member
to disposition fees and possible success-based sales fees. In addition, our
managing member’s ability to receive asset management fees and reimbursements
depends on our continued investment in properties and in other assets which
generate fees to them. Therefore, the interest of our managing member and its
affiliates in receiving fees may conflict with our interests.
Multi-tenant
industrial properties accommodating small business tenants have a substantial
on-going risk of tenant lease defaults. If a tenant defaults on a lease,
we will generally lose rental income and have to pay legal costs, repair costs
and re-leasing commissions. We may be unable to re-lease the property for as
much rent as we previously received. We may incur additional expenditures in
re-leasing the property. We could experience delays in enforcing our rights and
collecting rents due from a defaulting tenant.
Risks we cannot
control will affect the value of our properties. The values of the
properties we purchase will be affected by:
|
·
|
changes in the general economic
climate;
|
|
·
|
oversupply of space or reduced
demand for real estate in local
area;
|
|
·
|
competition from other available
space;
|
|
·
|
governmental
regulations;
|
|
·
|
changes in zoning or tax
laws;
|
|
·
|
interest rate
levels;
|
|
·
|
availability of financing;
and
|
|
·
|
potential liability under
environmental laws.
|
These
factors may cause our rental income and the value of our properties to decrease
and may make it difficult for us to sell properties.
Lease
terminations could reduce our revenues from rents and our distributions to our
stockholders and cause the value of our unit holders’ investment in us to
decline. The
success of our investments depends upon the occupancy levels, rental income and
operating expenses of our properties and our company. In the event of tenant
default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as
landlord and may incur costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our
property. We may be unable to re-lease the property for the rent previously
received. We may be unable to sell a property with low occupancy without
incurring a loss. These events and others could cause us to reduce the amount of
distributions we make to unit holders and the value of our unit holders’
investment in us to decline.
8
Rising
expenses at both the property and the company level could reduce our net income
and our cash available for distribution to unit holders. Our
properties are subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any
or all of which may reduce our net income. If any property is not substantially
occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is insufficient to cover
operating expenses, we could be required to expend funds with respect to that
property for operating expenses. The properties are subject to increases in tax
rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and
maintenance and administrative expenses. If we are unable to lease properties on
a basis requiring the tenants to pay such expenses, we would be required to pay
some or all of those costs which would reduce our income and cash available for
distribution to unit holders.
We may experience
uninsured losses on our properties. We intend to maintain
commercial general liability insurance and property damage insurance on our
properties. We believe this insurance will be adequate to cover most risks. We
may not obtain earthquake insurance on our properties due to the lack of
available and affordable earthquake insurance. If one of our properties sustains
damage as a result of an earthquake, we may incur substantial losses and lose
our investment in the property. If we, as a property owner, incur any liability
that is not fully covered by insurance, we would be liable for such
amounts.
We may be subject
to environmental liabilities. Various federal and state
environmental laws and regulations to investigate and clean up hazardous or
toxic substances, asbestos-containing materials, or petroleum product releases
at the property may require an owner or operator of real estate. The presence of
contamination or the failure to remedy contamination will adversely affect the
owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate. The owner or operator of a site
may be liable to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from
environmental contamination.
We will not seek
any rulings from the Internal Revenue Service regarding any tax issues.
We are relying on opinions of our legal counsel. The opinions are based upon
representations and assumptions and conditioned upon the existence of specified
facts. The opinions are not binding on the IRS or the courts.
If we lose our
“partnership” status we would be taxed as a corporation. Our legal counsel has
advised us that we will be treated as a “partnership” for federal income tax
purposes and that we will not be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation, subject to the publicly traded partnership rules. The application
of “publicly traded partnership” rules to us will be based upon future facts.
The IRS may determine that we will be treated as a “publicly traded partnership”
if our units of membership interests are publicly traded or frequently
transferred. We have included provisions in our operating agreement designed to
avoid this result. If we were to be reclassified as an association taxable as a
corporation or classified as a publicly traded partnership, we would be taxed on
our net income at rates of up to 35% for federal income tax purposes. All items
of our income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit would be reflected only on our
tax returns and would not be passed through to our unit holders. If we were
treated as a corporation, distributions to our unit holders would be ordinary
dividend income to the extent of our earnings and profits, and the payment of
such dividends would not be deductible by us.
The IRS may
challenge our allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction. The
operating agreement provides for the allocation of income, gain, loss and
deduction among the unit holders. The rules regarding partnership allocations
are complex. It is possible that the IRS could successfully challenge the
allocations in the operating agreement and reallocate items of income, gain,
loss or deduction in a manner that reduces benefits or increases income
allocable our investors.
The IRS may
disallow deduction of fees and expenses or reallocate basis. The IRS may
challenge or disallow our deduction of some or all fees and expenses. The IRS
could seek to reallocate our basis in properties among land, improvements and
personal property. This could result in reduced tax losses or increased income
without a corresponding increase in net cash flow to our unit
holders.
Future events may
result in federal income tax treatment of us and our unit holders that is
materially and adversely different from the current tax treatment.
Changes in current law, including the internal revenue code, the treasury
regulations, administrative interpretations, and court decisions, could affect
taxable years arising before and after such events. There can be no assurance
that future legislation and administrative interpretations will not be applied
retroactively.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
As of the
date of this report, we own six properties: Normandie Business Center in
Torrance, California; Arrow Business Center in Irwindale, California; Zenith
Business Centre in Glenview, Illinois; Paramount Business Center in Paramount,
California, Interstate Commerce Center in Tempe, Arizona; and Shoemaker
Industrial Park in Santa Fe Spring, California. We purchased these properties
for all cash, without debt financing.
9
Although
a considerable number of leases expire within the next twelve months, most
tenants’ average tenure at the property exceeds 5 years and typically smaller
“mom-and-pops” tenants renew on a one year basis with our larger corporate
tenants renewing for 3 to 5 years. Existing leases at the property generally
include annual rental increases ranging between 3% and 5%.
Following
are descriptions of our properties:
Normandie
Business Center, Torrance, CA
On
September 27, 2002, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known
as Normandie Business Center. Normandie Business Center is located on
approximately 2.45 acres and is comprised of two single-story buildings built in
1989 consisting of approximately 48,711 leasable square feet. Our total
acquisition cost was approximately $3.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, this
property was 95.1% leased to 20 tenants whose spaces range in size from 1,200 to
3,358 square feet.
The
property is located in Torrance, California, and is in the South Bay submarket
of Los Angeles. The South Bay is one of the largest and most active industrial
submarkets in Los Angeles County near the ports of Los Angeles and Long
Beach.
The
property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
|
Average Annual
|
|||
December 31
|
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
95 | % | ||
2006
|
94 | % | ||
2007
|
95 | % | ||
2008
|
96 | % | ||
2009
|
98 | % |
The
property was built in 1989 and is currently in good physical condition. We
intend to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next
two years.
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years
for those leases in place at December 31, 2009:
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total
Leasable
Area
Expiring (%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring (%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
4 | 8,682 | $ | 102,000 | 17.8 | % | 18.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
11 | 22,739 | 289,000 | 46.7 | % | 51.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
4 | 9,196 | 121,000 | 18.9 | % | 21.5 | % | |||||||||||||
2012
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
2013
|
1 | 3,358 | 51,000 | 6.9 | % | 9.1 | % | |||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
20 | 43,975 | $ | 563,000 | 90.3 | % | 100.0 | % |
Arrow
Business Park, Irwindale, California
On
December 10, 2003, we purchased an existing multi-tenant business park known as
the Arrow Business Center, a single-story three building property built in 1987
consisting of approximately 69,592 square feet of leasable space on
approximately 5.04 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately
$6.0 million. As of December 31, 2009, the property was 83.2% leased to 28
tenants whose spaces range in size from approximately 800 square feet to over
4,800 square feet.
10
The
property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
|
Average Annual
|
|||
December 31
|
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
95 | % | ||
2006
|
99 | % | ||
2007
|
94 | % | ||
2008
|
89 | % | ||
2009
|
83 | % |
The
property was built in 1987 and is currently in good physical condition. We
intend to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next
two years.
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years
for leases in place as of December 31, 2009:
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent Of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total
Leasable
Area
Expiring (%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring (%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
4 | 9,600 | $ | 110,000 | 13.8 | % | 16.7 | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
14 | 25,054 | 283,000 | 36.0 | % | 42.9 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
6 | 15,772 | 171,000 | 22.7 | % | 26.0 | % | |||||||||||||
2012
|
3 | 4,208 | 62,000 | 6.0 | % | 9.4 | % | |||||||||||||
2013
|
1 | 2,160 | 33,000 | 3.1 | % | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
28 | 56,794 | $ | 659,000 | 81.6 | % | 100.0 | % |
Zenith
Drive Centre, Glenview, Illinois
On
January 25, 2005, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known as
Zenith Drive Centre. Zenith Drive Centre is a single-story, three building
property built in 1978 consisting of approximately 37,990 square feet of
leasable space on approximately 2.54 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost
was approximately $5.3 million. As of December 31, 2009, the property was 93.4%
leased to 29 tenants whose spaces range in size from approximately 100 square
feet to 6,000 square feet. Included in the acquisition and purchase price of
Zenith Drive Centre were a billboard sign and cellular relay antenna located on
the property leased to a large media company and communications company,
respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $1.8 million related to this building. In the third quarter of
2009, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $1.2 million.
The
property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
December 31
|
Average Annual
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
69 | % | ||
2006
|
74 | % | ||
2007
|
92 | % | ||
2008
|
88 | % | ||
2009
|
90 | % |
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information:
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent Of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total
Leasable
Area
Expiring (%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring (%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
— | — | $ | — | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
16 | 18,779 | 211,000 | 49.4 | % | 57.2 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
6 | 7,322 | 45,000 | 19.3 | % | 12.2 | % | |||||||||||||
2012
|
5 | 9,938 | 39,000 | 26.2 | % | 10.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2013
|
1 | — | 41,000 | — | 11.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
1 | — | 33,000 | — | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
29 | 36,039 | $ | 369,000 | 94.9 | % | 100.0 | % |
11
Clear
Channel Communications leases a portion of the land parcel for the purpose of
maintaining and displaying a billboard sign. Annual rent is $41,000 paid
annually in advance. This lease expires in 2013. Successive five-year extensions
run until 2038.
Cingular
Wireless leases a portion of the land parcel for the purpose of maintaining and
operating a cell-site. This lease expires in 2028. Monthly rent is currently
approximately $1,900 per month.
Paramount
Business Center, Paramount, California
On April
28, 2005, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known as
Paramount Business Center, a single-story, two building property built in 1985
consisting of approximately 30,157 square feet on approximately 1.66 acres of
land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $3.2 million. As of December
31, 2009, the property was 66.5% leased to eight tenants whose spaces range in
size from 2,025 square feet to 3,794 square feet. The property’s historical
occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
December 31
|
Average Annual
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
93 | % | ||
2006
|
100 | % | ||
2007
|
96 | % | ||
2008
|
86 | % | ||
2009
|
66 | % |
We intend
to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two
years.
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information:
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent Of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total
Leasable
Area
Expiring (%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring
(%)(1)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
— | — | $ | — | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
5 | 10,727 | 105,000 | 35.6 | % | 61.1 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
2 | 5,803 | 67,000 | 19.2 | % | 38.9 | % | |||||||||||||
2012
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
2013
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
7 | 16,530 | $ | 172,000 | 54.8 | % | 100.0 | % |
Interstate
Commerce Center, Tempe, Arizona
On
September 30, 2005, we purchased a multi-tenant industrial park built in 1987 in
Tempe, Arizona, near the Phoenix airport. This property consists of four
buildings totaling 83,385 square feet of leasable space situated on
approximately 5.02 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately
$7.5 million. As of December 31, 2009, the property was 90.0% leased to four
tenants whose spaces range in size from 8,372 square feet to 28,099 square feet.
The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
December 31
|
Average Annual
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
82 | % | ||
2006
|
87 | % | ||
2007
|
100 | % | ||
2008
|
95 | % | ||
2009
|
90 | % |
We intend
to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two
years.
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five
years:
12
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent Of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total
Leasable
Area
Expiring (%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring (%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
— | — | $ | — | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
1 | 19,930 | 158,000 | 23.9 | % | 25.5 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
2012
|
1 | 14,883 | 125,000 | 17.9 | % | 20.2 | % | |||||||||||||
2013
|
2 | 40,200 | 336,000 | 48.2 | % | 54.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
4 | 75,013 | $ | 619,000 | 90.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Shoemaker
Industrial Park, Santa Fe Spring, California
On June
28, 2006 we acquired Shoemaker Industrial Park. The acquisition price was $9.9
million. This property consists of three buildings totaling 86,084 square feet
of leasable space situated on approximately 4.0 acres of land. As of December
31, 2009, the property was 70.9% leased to 15 tenants whose spaces range in size
from 1,960 square feet to 13,617 square feet. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we
recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.9 million related to this
building.
The
property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:
Year Ending
Dec 31
|
Average Annual
Occupancy (%)
|
|||
2005
|
99 | % | ||
2006
|
79 | % | ||
2007
|
95 | % | ||
2008
|
91 | % | ||
2009
|
78 | % |
We intend
to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two
years.
The
following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five
years:
Year Ending
December 31
|
No. of Leases
Expiring
|
Approx.
Amount of
Expiring
Leases (Sq.
Feet)
|
Base Rent Of
Expiring
Leases
(Annual $)
|
Percent of
Total Leasable
Area Expiring
(%)
|
Percent of
Total Annual
Base Rent
Expiring (%)
|
|||||||||||||||
Month
to month
|
1 | 2,422 | $ | 42,000 | 2.8 | % | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||
2010
|
8 | 19,473 | 212,000 | 22.6 | % | 34.8 | % | |||||||||||||
2011
|
2 | 14,680 | 145,000 | 17.1 | % | 23.8 | % | |||||||||||||
2012
|
3 | 22,537 | 210,000 | 26.2 | % | 34.5 | % | |||||||||||||
2013
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
2014
and thereafter
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
14 | 59,112 | $ | 609,000 | 68.7 | % | 100.0 | % |
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time in the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to legal
proceeding, claims, or disputes. As of the date hereof, we are not a
party to any pending legal proceedings
There are
no pending material legal proceedings to which we or our assets are
subject. In addition, no such material proceedings are known to be
contemplated against us.
13
ITEM
4. RESERVED
14
PART
II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS, RELATED MEMBER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
There is
no established public trading market for our units of membership interests and
it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will develop.
Under our operating agreement, our managing member has the right to refuse to
permit the transfer of units in its reasonable discretion.
Holders
On August
18, 2005, we completed our public offering of units. We had sold a total of
100,000 units of membership interest to 1,448 investors for a total investment
of $50,000,000. The sale of the units of membership interest was made pursuant
to a registration statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As of December
31, 2009, 98,814 units remained outstanding held of record by 1,299
holders.
Distributions
Holders
of our units are generally entitled to receive 90% of cash from operations, as
defined in the operating agreement, each year until investors receive an 8%
cumulative, non-compounded annual return, then 50% of cash from operations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a 12% cumulative non-compounded annual return
applies to specified early investors for the 12-month period subsequent to the
date of their capital contributions and is in lieu of the 8% return during that
period. Our managing member is entitled to receive the remaining cash from
operations. Holders of our units receive 100% of net proceeds from property
sales until they have received the return of their capital contributions, then
90% of net proceeds from property sales until they have received an overall 8%
non-compounded annual return, taking into account all prior distributions, and
thereafter 50% of net proceeds from property sales is paid to the holders of our
units and 50% is paid to our managing member.
As of
December 31, 2009, we have distributed a total of $15,187,000 to our investors,
of which $14,465,000 was paid to unit holders and $722,000 was paid to our
managing member. Of the amount paid to unit holders, $786,000 was paid directly
from funds of our managing member. We contemplate making distributions quarterly
but distributions may be made more or less frequently.
On
January 15, 2010, we distributed an additional $623,000 to our investors, of
which $623,000 was paid to unit holders and $0 was paid to our managing
member.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
We do not
have any equity compensation plans and no units of membership interests are
issuable under any individual compensation arrangement.
Unit
Repurchases
On
February 22, 2007, our unit holders approved an amendment to the Fund’s
operating agreement to eliminate the prohibition on repurchases of units by the
Fund and add a provision to the operating agreement specifically permitting the
managing member to cause the Fund to repurchase units at any time, and from time
to time, on such terms and conditions as the managing member may determine in
its sole discretion; provided that such repurchases do not jeopardize the status
of the Fund as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or cause the Fund
to be treated as a publicly-traded partnership.
As of
December 31, 2009, we have redeemed 1,186 units at the repurchase price noted
below per unit less a $37.50 per investor transaction fee. During the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, we repurchased units as follows:
15
Period
|
Total Number of Units
Repurchased (1)
|
Average Price Paid
per Unit
|
Approximate Number of
Units that may yet be
purchased under the
Program (2)
|
|||||||||
1st
quarter of 2008
|
75 | $ | 435 | 460 | ||||||||
2nd
quarter of 2008
|
95 | $ | 435 | 365 | ||||||||
3rd
quarter of 2008
|
105 | $ | 435 | 260 | ||||||||
4th
quarter of 2008
|
95 | $ | 435 | 165 | ||||||||
370 | ||||||||||||
1st
quarter of 2009
|
105 | $ | 435 | 575 | ||||||||
2nd
quarter of 2009
|
84 | $ | 348 | 491 | ||||||||
3rd
quarter of 2009
|
203 | $ | 348 | 288 | ||||||||
4th
quarter of 2009
|
144 | $ | 348 | 144 | ||||||||
536 |
(1)
|
All units were repurchased
pursuant to the Fund’s publicly announced unit repurchase
program.
|
(2)
|
The
number of units repurchased in the 2009 and 2008 calendar years may not
exceed $200,000 for each of the years or approximately $50,000 per
quarter.
|
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The
selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto and the “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Operating
Data
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 3,633,000 | $ | 4,033,000 | $ | 4,039,000 | $ | 3,298,000 | $ | 2,103,000 | ||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations
|
(2,141,000 | ) | (508,000 | ) | 1,285,000 | 796,000 | 592,000 | |||||||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | — | 351,000 | 78,000 | 36,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (2,141,000 | ) | $ | (508,000 | ) | $ | 1,636,000 | $ | 874,000 | $ | 628,000 | ||||||||
Net (loss) income allocable to unit holders | $ | (1,927,000 | ) | $ | (457,000 | ) | $ | 1,472,000 | $ | 787,000 | $ | 565,000 | ||||||||
Basic
and diluted (loss) income allocable to unit holders per weighted
average unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | (19.42 | ) | $ | (4.59 | ) | $ | 11.57 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 6.33 | ||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
— | — | $ | 3.16 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average units outstanding
|
99,218 | 99,618 | 99,930 | 100,000 | 84,127 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
distributions per weighted average units outstanding (a)
|
$ | 24.99 | $ | 35.06 | $ | 25.02 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 21.55 |
(a) Excludes distributions paid to
the managing member.
16
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately
$1.8 million on Zenith Drive Centre. In the third quarter of 2009, we
recorded an additional impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million on Zenith
Drive Centre. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded an impairment
charge of approximately $1.9 million on Shoemaker Industrial Park.
Balance
Sheet Data
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
29,239,000
|
$
|
34,401,000
|
$
|
38,830,000
|
$
|
40,269,000
|
$
|
41,506,000
|
||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
$
|
698,000
|
$
|
862,000
|
$
|
943,000
|
$
|
1,134,000
|
$
|
744,000
|
||||||||||
Members’
capital
|
$
|
28,541,000
|
$
|
33,539,000
|
$
|
37,887000
|
$
|
39,135,000
|
$
|
40,761,000
|
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with our audited financial
statements and notes thereto as well as the Section “Properties” contained
elsewhere in this report. See also the “Special Note about Forward-looking
Statements” preceding Item 1 of this report.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of
these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from the
estimates.
Revenue
Recognition and Valuation of Receivables
Revenue
is recorded in accordance with ASC 840-10, Leases, and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, as amended” (“SAB 104”). Revenue is recognized
when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the
rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured
collectability. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally
recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a
collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with
contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash
rental payments due for the period. Because the Fund’s leases may provide for
free rent, lease incentives, or other rental increases at specified intervals,
the Fund straight-line the recognition of revenue, which results in the
recording of a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. The Fund’s
revenues are comprised largely of rental income and other income collected from
tenants. Management is required to determine, in its judgment, to what
extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is
collectible. Management reviews unbilled rent receivable on a
quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the
financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which
the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is
located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with
respect to any given tenant is in doubt, the Fund records an increase in its
allowance for doubtful accounts or records a direct write-off of the specific
rent receivable.
Investments
in Real Estate
Upon
acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property based
upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land,
buildings, site improvements and intangible lease assets or liabilities
including in-place leases, above market and below market leases. We allocated
the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired
property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value of the building
is depreciated over an estimated useful life of 39 years.
In-place
lease values are calculated based on management’s evaluation of the specific
characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place lease intangibles,
which are included as a component of investments in real estate, is amortized to
expense over the average expected lease term.
Acquired
above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the
difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the
remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is
amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an
adjustment to rental revenue on our statements of operations.
Impairment
of Real Estate Assets
Rental
properties and intangibles are individually evaluated for impairment when
conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected
future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount. Impairment
indicators for our rental properties are assessed by project and include, but is
not limited to, significant fluctuations in estimated net operating income,
occupancy changes, rental rates and other market factors. We assess the expected
undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not limited
to, appropriate capitalization rates, available market information, historical
operating results, known trends and market/economic conditions that may affect
the property and our assumptions about the use of the asset, including, if
necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under
consideration. Upon determination that impairment has occurred and that the
future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, a write-down
will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount to its estimated fair
value.
17
Investment
in Real Estate Held-for-Sale
We
evaluate the held-for-sale classification of our owned real estate each
quarter. Assets that are classified as held-for-sale are recorded at the lower
of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Assets are generally
classified as held-for-sale once management commits to a plan to sell
the properties and has initiated an active program to market them for sale.
The results of operations of these real estate properties are reflected as
discontinued operations in all periods reported. At December 31, 2009, no real
estate assets were classified as held for sale.
Commitments
and Contingencies
We
monitor our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While
there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not
exist, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to
the properties that would have a material effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any
environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an
environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or
the recording of a loss contingency.
Our
commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate
owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of
management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our
financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are not presently
subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, any material
litigation threatened against the Fund which if determined unfavorably to us
would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or
results of operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Reference
is made to Notes to our Financial Statements, which begin on page F-1 of this
Form 10-K.
Results
of Operations
Overview
We were
formed in October of 1998 to invest in multi-tenant business parks catering to
small business tenants. Our properties are located in major metropolitan areas
in the United States and are owned on an all cash basis without debt financing.
Our revenues consist primarily of rental income from our properties and
additional rent in the form of expense reimbursements derived from our income
producing properties. Our properties are located in Los Angeles,
California, Chicago, Illinois and Phoenix, Arizona.
Market
Outlook – Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets
During
2008 and 2009, significant and widespread concerns about credit risk and access
to capital have been present in the global capital markets. Both the national
and most global economies have experienced substantially increased unemployment
and a downturn in economic activity. In addition, the failure or near failure of
several large financial institutions early in this period and the continued
failures of smaller financial institutions and businesses, together with
government interventions in the financial system, including interventions in
bankruptcy proceedings and restrictions on businesses, have led to increased
market uncertainty and volatility. Despite certain recent positive economic
indicators and improved stock market performance, the aforementioned conditions,
combined with stagnant business activity and low consumer confidence, have
resulted in an unprecedented global recession and continue to contribute to a
challenging macro-economic environment that may interfere with the
implementation of our business strategy or force us to modify
it.
18
As a
result of the decline in general economic conditions, the U.S. commercial real
estate industry has also been experiencing deteriorating fundamentals across all
major property types and most geographic markets. Tenant defaults are on the
rise, while demand for commercial real estate space is contracting. It is
expected that this will create a highly competitive leasing environment that
should result in downward pressure on both occupancy and rental rates, resulting
in leasing incentives becoming more common. Mortgage delinquencies and defaults
have trended upward, with many industry analysts predicting significant credit
defaults, foreclosures and principal losses, in particular for subordinate
securitized debt instruments. These
market conditions have and will likely continue to have a significant impact on
our real estate investments. In addition, these market conditions have impacted
our tenants’ businesses, which makes it more difficult for them to meet current
lease obligations and places pressure on them to negotiate favorable lease terms
upon renewal in order for their businesses to remain viable. Increases in rental
concessions given to retain tenants and maintain our occupancy level, which is
vital to the continued success of our portfolio, has resulted in lower current
cash flow. Projected future declines in rental rates, slower or potentially
negative net absorption of leased space and expectations of future rental
concessions, including free rent to retain tenants who are up for renewal or to
sign new tenants, are expected to result in additional decreases in cash
flows.
Continuing
Operations
During
2009 and 2008, we owned and operated six properties for the entire
year.
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Rental
revenues decreased to $3,001,000 in 2009 from $3,352,000 in 2008 primarily
due to longer lease up periods of vacant units, lower market lease rates and
higher concessions to attract and retain tenants as a result of the national
economic crisis partially offset by existing tenant leases with rent
escalations. Tenant reimbursements and other income decreased to $632,000 in
2009 from $681,000 in 2008 primarily due to the same reasons.
Property
operating and maintenance expense decreased to $879,000 in 2009 from $942,000 in
2008. The decrease is largely due to lower refurbishment and maintenance costs,
lower property administrative and insurance expense partially offset by an
increase in bad debt expense.
Property
tax expense increased to $603,000 in 2009 from $564,000 in 2008 primarily
due to an increase in assessed property tax value for two of the
properties.
General
and administrative expenses decreased to $250,000 in 2009 from $267,000 in 2008
due primarily to the decrease in audit and professional fees, partially offset
by an increase in Sarbanes Oxley readiness costs.
Depreciation
and amortization decreased to $947,000 in 2009 from $1,049,000 in 2008. The
decrease is due to a real estate impairment loss recognized in December 31,
2008, reducing depreciable basis, and full amortization of intangible assets at
two properties.
Impairment
of real estate increased to approximately $3,096,000 in 2009 from $1,808,000 in
2008 due to impairment charges recorded to reflect a decline in the
market value of two of our real estate properties in 2009 compared to one
property in 2008.
Interest
and other income decreased to $1,000 in 2009 from $89,000 in 2008. This decrease
is primarily attributable to lower short-term investment rates combined with a
lower average cash balance in 2009.
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
Rental
revenues decreased to $3,352,000 in 2008 from $3,380,000 in 2007 largely
due to higher vacancy rates offset by rental increases from new and existing
tenants in 2008. Tenant expense reimbursements and other income increased to
$681,000 in 2008 from $659,000 in 2007 largely due to tenant reimbursements
escalations from new and existing tenants offset by free rent provided to
new tenants and higher vacancies.
Property
operating and maintenance expenses increased to $942,000 in 2008 from $840,000
in 2007. The increase is largely due to higher bad debt, collection and
landscaping expenses offset by lower property insurance
costs.
19
Property
taxes decreased to $564,000 in 2008 from $581,000 in 2007 primarily due to lower
assessed property tax value for one of the properties.
General
and administrative expenses decreased to $267,000 in 2008 from $421,000 in 2007
due primarily to lower Sarbanes Oxley readiness and other professional
fees.
Depreciation
and amortization in 2008 was consistent with the 2007 amount.
Impairment
of real estate charges increased to approximately $1,808,000 in 2008 from $0 in
2007 due to an impairment change recorded to reflect a decline in the
market values of one real estate property, resulting from the fourth quarter
2008 economic decline.
Interest
and other income decreased to $89,000 in 2008 from $141,000 in 2007. This
decrease is primarily due to 2008 including a one-time 2004 property tax appeal
refund for approx $44,000 combined with 2008 having lower short-term investment
rates and a lower average cash balance.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
February 28, 2010, we had approximately $0.5 million in cash and cash
equivalents. Our management believes the cash on hand and the cash flow
generated by operation of the properties will be adequate to meet operating
costs of the properties and the company. If the cash flow generated by operation
of the properties we own is not sufficient to fully fund distributions, we
may fund distributions from cash reserves, from the proceeds of a sale of a
property, or upon unit holders’ approval, with debt financing.
We expect
that primary sources of capital over the long term will include net cash flows
from operations and net proceeds from the sale of our properties. We expect that
our primary uses of capital will be for the payment of tenant improvements and
leasing commissions, operating expenses and distributions.
We intend
to hold the properties in which we have invested until we determine that selling
or otherwise disposing of properties would help us to achieve our investment
objectives. General economic conditions, availability of financing, interest
rates and other factors, including supply and demand, all of which are beyond
our control, affect the real estate market.
Off-balance
Sheet Financings and Liabilities
Other
than lease commitments and legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of
business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or
liabilities. We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries or any interests in,
or relationships with, any special-purpose entities.
Contractual
Obligations
Not
applicable.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We invest
our cash and cash equivalents in FDIC insured savings accounts and securities
backed by the United States government, which, by their nature, are not subject
to interest rate fluctuations. At times, cash balances may be in excess of
amounts insured by Federal agencies.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our
financial statements, related notes and supplemental schedules are contained on
pages F-1 to F-16
of this report. The index to such items is included in Item 15(a).
ITEM
9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
BDO
Seidman, LLP, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm, was
dismissed on September 16, 2009. The reports of BDO Seidman, LLP on the
registrant’s financial statements for either of the past two years did not
contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the
Fund’s two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period preceding
such dismissal, there were no disagreements with BDO Seidman, LLP on any matter
of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of BDO Seidman, LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the
subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report. During the
same period, there have been no reportable events, as that term is defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
20
On
September 22, 2009, the Fund engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP as its new
independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to change
accountants was approved by the Financial Oversight Committee of the managing
member of the registrant.
During
the Fund’s two most recent fiscal years through September 22, 2009 the
registrant did not consult Deloitte & Touche LLP with respect to the
application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either
completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
the Fund’s financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events as
set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
The Fund
provided BDO Seidman, LLP with a copy of the Form 8-K filed with regard to the
change in independent registered public accounting firm, which was filed on
September 22, 2009 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and requested
BDO Seidman, LLP to furnish a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission stating whether or not it agreed with the statements above. A copy of
the letter from BDO Seidman, LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission,
dated September 21, 2009, is attached as Exhibit 16.1 to the September 22, 2009
report on Form 8-K.
21
ITEM
9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that
the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report.
In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that we maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our
most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Fund’s independent
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Fund’s
independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to
provide only management’s report in this annual report.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
22
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Cornerstone
Industrial Properties, LLC is a California limited liability company, which was
initially organized for the purpose of being our managing member. Our managing
member is owned by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. as well as various investors which
do not have any voting rights or control with respect to the operations of our
managing member.
Our
managing member also acts as the manager of another investment fund and is a
preferred shareholder of Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc., our Managing
Broker/Dealer. The manager of our managing member is Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. oversees the activities of our managing member and
provides many of the services necessary for our managing member to fulfill its
responsibilities to us. The Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. team of professionals
brings together a unique blend of talent and experience. As of March 22, 2010,
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. was the owner of 26.4% of the equity profits interest
in our managing member and has sole voting control with respect to our
operations.
Board
of Directors of Manager of Managing Member
Terry G. Roussel, age 56, is
one of the founding shareholders of the Cornerstone-related entities that
commenced operations in 1989. Mr. Roussel is President, Chief Executive Officer,
a Director and the majority shareholder of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., the
manager of our managing member of the Fund. Mr. Roussel is also the President,
Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT and
Cornerstone Growth & Income REIT, Inc. and their advisors, Cornerstone
Realty Advisors, LLC and Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC,
respectively and the majority shareholder, a director and an officer of Pacific
Cornerstone Capital, Inc. Under Mr. Roussel’s direction, Cornerstone Ventures
and its affiliates formed nine separate real estate investment funds and joint
ventures. In 1993, Cornerstone and its affiliates became managing joint venture
partner with Koll Capital Markets Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Koll
Management Services, Inc. (now owned by CB Richard Ellis).
On
December 11, 2009, Mr. Roussel and Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc.
entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) with the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) relating to alleged rule violations. The
AWC set forth FINRA’s findings that Pacific Cornerstone Capital and
Mr. Roussel had violated conduct rules in connection with private
placements conducted by Pacific Cornerstone Capital during the period from
January 1, 2004 through May 30, 2009. Without admitting or denying the
allegations and findings against them, Pacific Cornerstone Capital and
Mr. Roussel consented in the AWC to various findings by FINRA, which allege
that they violated NASD and FINRA rules relating to communications with the
public (NASD Rule 2210); supervision (NASD Rule 3010), and standards of
commercial honor and principles of trade (FINRA Rule 2010, formerly NASD Rule
2110). FINRA’s allegations, in sum, focus on claimed material misstatements and
omissions with respect to certain performance targets used in connection with
the private placements. Pacific Cornerstone Capital consented to a censure and
fine of $700,000. Mr. Roussel consented to a fine of $50,000, suspension from
association with a FINRA member in all capacities for 20 business days, and
suspension from association with a FINRA member firm in a principal capacity for
an additional three months.
As
managing partner of the above-described funds and joint ventures, Cornerstone
Ventures, Inc. and its affiliates were responsible for the acquisition,
operation, leasing, and disposition of all jointly owned properties between Koll
and Cornerstone. In connection with acquiring properties for the account of
these joint ventures, Mr. Roussel personally supervised the acquisition of each
property, initiated and directed the business plan for each property, and
arranged debt and equity financing the acquisition of each
property.
In
addition to his real estate experience, Mr. Roussel gained valuable financial
services industry experience earlier in his career. In 1985, Mr. Roussel started
the Special Investments Group, a new division within Bank of America’s Capital
Markets Group, which provided real estate investment opportunities to the bank’s
wealthiest private banking clients. Between 1980 and 1985, Mr. Roussel was
employed by Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc., a regional securities firm
headquartered in Los Angeles, California. In this capacity, Mr. Roussel was
promoted to First Vice President and Manager of the partnership finance
department where he was responsible for the due diligence and marketing of all
publicly registered and real estate funds offered by the firm.
Mr.
Roussel graduated with honors from California State University at Fullerton in
1976 with a B.A. in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting.
Subsequent to graduation, Mr. Roussel joined the accounting firm of Arthur
Andersen & Co. as an auditor and later transferred to the tax department of
Arthur Young & Co., a predecessor firm to Ernst & Young. Mr. Roussel
became a Certified Public Accountant in 1979 (now inactive).
23
Alfred J. Pizzurro, age 54, is a
Director and Senior Vice President and shareholder of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.
as well as a shareholder, director and officer of Pacific Cornerstone Capital,
Inc., the dealer manager for the Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC offering that
closed in August of 2005. Mr. Pizzurro joined Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. in
April 1998 and has been the individual primarily responsible for Cornerstone’s
marketing and new business development activities since that time.
Between
1993 and 1998, Mr. Pizzurro was responsible for business development both
domestically and internationally for The Joseph Company, a research and
development company. From 1986 to 1992, he was the Director of Marketing for a
regional real estate company. Mr. Pizzurro served as a pilot in the United
States Marine Corps between 1979 and 1986 where he attained the rank of
Captain.
Mr.
Pizzurro received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Communications from Clarion
University in 1978.
Financial
Oversight Committee
We do not
have a board of directors or an audit committee. Accordingly, as the managing
member of our manager, Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. has established a Financial
Oversight Committee consisting of Terry G. Roussel, as the Principal Executive
Officer and Sharon C. Kaiser, as the Principal Financial Officer of Cornerstone
Ventures, Inc. The Financial Oversight Committee will serve the equivalent
function of an audit committee for, among others, the following purposes:
appointment, compensation, review and oversight of the work of our independent
registered public accounting firm, and establishing and enforcing our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics. The Financial Oversight Committee is not
independent of us or the managing member.
Management
of the Managing Member
Mr.
Roussel is the Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Pizzurro is a Senior Vice
President of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. The remaining executive officer of
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. is Sharon C. Kaiser. The experience of Mssrs. Roussel
and Pizzurro are described above under “Board of Directors of Manager of
Managing member” Ms. Kaiser’s experience is described below.
Sharon C. Kaiser, age 65, has served as the Chief
Financial Officer of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. since October 2005. Ms. Kaiser
joined Cornerstone in July 2005 as Chief Financial Officer of Cornerstone Core
Properties REIT, Inc. and its advisor, Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC. Ms.
Kaiser is responsible for finance and accounting.
Prior to
joining Cornerstone, Ms. Kaiser was Director of Financial Operations for
Westfield America, Inc., Westfield is one of the largest REITs in the
world.
From 1999
to 2002, Ms. Kaiser served as Chief Financial Officer of The StayWell Company, a
subsidiary of Vivendi Universal, and from 1995 to 1999, where she served as
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of HemaCare Corporation, a
publicly traded biomedical company. Her responsibilities included financial
accounting and reporting, information technology, investor relations and human
resources, as well as strategic planning and acquisition due diligence and
integration.
Before
joining HemaCare Corporation, Ms. Kaiser served as the Chief Financial Officer
of a publicly traded (AMEX) REIT sponsored by the Koll Company. Earlier she
spent eight years with Arthur Andersen and Co.
Ms.
Kaiser holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the
University of Southern California and has been a Certified Public Accountant
since 1981.
Compensation
We
reimburse our managing member for its direct expenses in administering our
business and pay our managing member compensation for its services as provided
in the operating agreement. Our managing member is also entitled to receive a
percentage of net cash flow from operations and net sales proceeds, both as
defined in our operating agreement. See Item 13 for a discussion of the fees we
pay to our managing member and its affiliates.
Services
Performed by Others
Our
managing member and its affiliates outsource certain functions and intend to
continue hiring independent persons and companies to provide services to us as
called for by the operating agreement or which, in the opinion of our managing
member, would be in our best interests. We will pay the cost of all such
services unless those services are to be provided by our managing
member.
24
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our managers
and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our
equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Managers and
greater than 10% beneficial owners are also required by rules promulgated by the
SEC to furnish the Fund with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.
During
the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, there were no Section
16(a) filings required.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
Cornerstone
Ventures, Inc. has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to
all of its officers and directors, including Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be
found on http://www.crefunds.com.
ITEM
11.
|
COMPENSATION
OF OUR MANAGING MEMBER AND
AFFILIATES
|
We do not
have executive officers or directors. We did not pay compensation to the
executive officers of our managing member’s managing member for services
rendered to us. See Item 13 for a discussion of the fees paid to and services
provided by our managing member and its affiliates
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED MEMBER
MATTERS
|
There are
no units of membership interest owned by our managing member as of December 31,
2009. There are five units of membership interest owned by Terry G. Roussel as
of December 31, 2009 which represents less than 1% of the units
outstanding.
No
arrangements exist which would, upon implementation, result in a change in
control of the Company.
We do not
have any equity compensation plans and did not have any such plan as of December
31, 2009.
25
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Compensation
and Fees to be paid to our Managing Member and its Affiliates
Following
is a summary of the compensation and fees paid by us to our managing member and
its affiliates in connection with the operation of the company and the
liquidation of our properties for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Type
of Compensation
and
Recipient
|
Method
of Compensation
|
Amount
|
||||
OPERATIONAL
STAGE
|
||||||
Property
management fees payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some
or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties
|
Property
management fees equal to 6% of the gross rental income generated by each
property will be paid monthly
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Property
refurbishment supervision fee payable to our managing member and/or its
affiliates some or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third
parties
|
Property
refurbishment supervision fee equal to 10% of the cost of tenant
improvements or capital improvements made to our
properties
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Leasing
commissions payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some or
all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties
|
Leasing
commissions paid upon execution of each lease equal to 6% of rent
scheduled to be paid during the first and second year of the lease, 5%
during the third and fourth years and 4% during the fifth and later
years
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Incentive
share of net cash flow from operations payable to our managing
member
|
10%
of net cash flow from operations each year until unit holders have
received distributions equal to an 8% per annum, simple return for the
year or the early investors 12% incentive return, then 50% of net cash
flow from operations
|
$
|
192,000
|
|||
Reimbursement
of actual cost of goods, materials and other services supplied to us by
our managing member
|
Reimbursement
of actual expenses and costs
|
$
|
—
|
LIQUIDATION
STAGE
|
||||||
Property
disposition fees payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some
or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties. Our managing
member will not be given an exclusive right to sell our
properties
|
Property
disposition fees in an amount equal to 6% of the contract sales price of
the property
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Incentive
share of net sales proceeds payable to our managing member
|
After
the unit holders have received an amount equal to their aggregate capital
contributions, 10% of proceeds from property sales until the unit holders
have received an amount equal to an aggregate 8% per annum, cumulative,
non-compounded return taking into account all prior distributions and
thereafter 50% of proceeds from property sales
|
$
|
—
|
26
Director
Independence
We are a
limited liability company, not a corporation, and are therefore managed by our
managing member, Cornerstone Industrial Properties LLC, rather than by a board
of directors. Our managing member is managed by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.,
which has a board of directors comprised of two directors, Terry G. Roussel and
Alfred J. Pizzurro. Since our securities are not listed on a national securities
exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system, we are not subject to the director
independence standards that are applicable to listed entities. Neither Mr.
Roussel nor Mr. Pizzurro would be considered independent as defined in the rules
applicable to listed entities.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
BDO
Seidman, LLP audited our financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 and the first two quarters of 2009. Commencing with the
third quarter of 2009, Deloitte & Touche, LLP became our independent
registered public accounting firm.
Audit
and Non-Audit Fees
Aggregate
fees for professional services rendered to us by BDO Seidman, LLP and Deloitte
& Touche, LLP for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
Deloitte
& Touche
|
BDO
Seidman
|
||||||||||||||
Services
Provided
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||
Audit
Fees
|
$ | 74,000 | $ | - | $ | 38,000 | $ | 134,000 | |||||||
All
Other Fees
|
- | - | - | 1,000 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 74,000 | $ | - | $ | 38,000 | $ | 135,000 |
Audit Fees. The aggregate
fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were for the audits
of our financial statements and reviews of our interim financial statements
included in our annual and quarterly reports.
All Other Fees. The
aggregate fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were for
expense related to the audits of our financial statements and reviews of our
interim financial statements included in our annual and quarterly
reports.
27
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
The
Financial Oversight Committee has implemented pre-approval policies and
procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these
procedures, the Financial Oversight Committee pre-approves both the type of
services to be provided by its auditor and the estimated fees related to these
services.
During
the approval process, the Financial Oversight Committee considers the impact of
the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditor.
The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the
auditor’s independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations.
Throughout the year, the Financial Oversight Committee will review any revisions
to the estimates of audit and non-audit fees initially
approved.
28
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
(1)
|
Financial
Statements
|
The
following financial statements are included in a separate section of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K commencing on the page numbers specified below:
Reports of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firms
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
Statements
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Statements
of Members’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Notes to
Financial Statements
(a) (2)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
Schedule
II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule
III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(a) (3)
|
Exhibits
|
3.1
|
Articles of Organization
(incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File
No. 333-76609, filed April 20,
1999).
|
3.2
|
Operating Agreement (Amended and
Restated) dated as of June 30, 2003, as amended by Amendment No.1 dated as
of February 22, 2007 and Amendment No.2 dated as of June 2, 2009
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q
filed on August 10,
2009.)
|
3.3
|
Amendment to Articles of
Organization filed August 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File
No. 333-76609, filed February 4,
2000).
|
3.4
|
Amendment to Articles of
Organization of the Fund filed January 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference
to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11,
File No. 333-76609, filed February 4,
2000).
|
14.1
|
Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Form
10-K filed on March 29,
2006)
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 26th day of March
2010.
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
|
||||
By
|
CORNERSTONE
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, LLC:
|
|||
its
Managing Member
|
||||
By
|
CORNERSTONE
VENTURES, INC.:
|
|||
its
Manager
|
||||
By
|
/s/
TERRY G. ROUSSEL
|
|||
Terry
G. Roussel, President
|
||||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||||
By
|
/s/SHARON
C. KAISER
|
|||
Sharon
C. Kaiser, Chief Financial Officer
|
||||
(Principal
Financial Officer and
|
||||
Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following person
on behalf of the registrant has signed this report below in the capacity as and
on the date indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/
TERRY G. ROUSSEL
|
Director
of Cornerstone
|
March
26, 2010
|
||
Ventures,
Inc.
|
||||
Terry
G. Roussel
|
||||
/s/
ALFRED J. PIZZURRO
|
Director
of Cornerstone
|
March
26, 2010
|
||
Ventures,
Inc.
|
||||
Alfred
J. Pizzurro
|
30
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
F-2
|
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-4
|
Statements
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
F-5
|
Statements
of Members’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
F-6
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007
|
F-7
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
F-8
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Members
Cornerstone
Realty Fund, LLC
Irvine,
California
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC, (the
“Fund”) a California limited liability company, as of December 31, 2009 and the
related statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Our audit also included financial statement schedules
for the year ended December 31, 2009 listed in the index at Item 15. These
financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Fund’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedules based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC as of
December 31, 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial
statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
/s/DELOITTE
& TOUCHE, LLP
Costa
Mesa, California
March 26,
2010
F-2
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Members
Cornerstone
Realty Fund, LLC
Irvine,
California
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC, (the
“Fund”) a California limited liability company, as of December 31, 2008, and the
related statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows for each of
the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008. In connection with our
audits of the financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement
schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and
schedules are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedules based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC as of
December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Also, in
our opinion, the financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
Costa
Mesa, California
March 11,
2009
F-3
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
BALANCE
SHEETS
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 761,000 | $ | 2,289,000 | ||||
Investments
in real estate
|
||||||||
Land
|
10,443,000 | 11,474,000 | ||||||
Buildings
and improvements value, net
|
17,375,000 | 19,885,000 | ||||||
Intangible
lease value, net
|
106,000 | 198,000 | ||||||
Intangible
asset — in-place leases, net
|
9,000 | 84,000 | ||||||
27,933,000 | 31,641,000 | |||||||
Other
assets
|
||||||||
Tenant
and other receivables, less allowance of $190,000 in 2009 and $105,000 in
2008
|
313,000 | 274,000 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
52,000 | 36,000 | ||||||
Leasing
commissions, net
|
180,000 | 161,000 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 29,239,000 | $ | 34,401,000 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 204,000 | $ | 316,000 | ||||
Real
estate taxes payable
|
233,000 | 219,000 | ||||||
Tenant
security deposits
|
256,000 | 295,000 | ||||||
Intangible
lease liability, net
|
5,000 | 32,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
698,000 | 862,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) | ||||||||
Members’
capital (100,000 units authorized and issued at 2009 and 2008; 98,814 and
99,350 units outstanding at 2009 and 2008)
|
28,541,000 | 33,539,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and members’ capital
|
$ | 29,239,000 | $ | 34,401,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-4
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Rental
revenues
|
$
|
3,001,000
|
$
|
3,352,000
|
$
|
3,380,000
|
||||||
Tenant
reimbursements and other income
|
632,000
|
681,000
|
659,000
|
|||||||||
3,633,000
|
4,033,000
|
4,039,000
|
||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Property
operating and maintenance
|
879,000
|
942,000
|
840,000
|
|||||||||
Property
taxes
|
603,000
|
564,000
|
581,000
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
250,000
|
267,000
|
421,000
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
947,000
|
1,049,000
|
1,053,000
|
|||||||||
Impairment
of real estate
|
3,096,000
|
1,808,000
|
—
|
|||||||||
5,775,000
|
4,630,000
|
2,895,000
|
||||||||||
Interest
and other income
|
1,000
|
89,000
|
141,000
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(2,141,000
|
)
|
(508,000
|
)
|
1,285,000
|
|||||||
Discontinued
operation:
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of real estate
|
—
|
—
|
306,000
|
|||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
—
|
—
|
45,000
|
|||||||||
—
|
—
|
351,000
|
||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(2,141,000
|
)
|
$
|
(508,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,636,000
|
||||
Net
(loss) income allocable to managing member
|
$
|
(214,000
|
)
|
$
|
(51,000
|
)
|
$
|
164,000
|
||||
Net
(loss) income allocable to unit holders:
|
||||||||||||
From
continuing operations
|
$
|
(1,927,000
|
)
|
$
|
(457,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,156,000
|
||||
From
discontinued operations
|
—
|
—
|
316,000
|
|||||||||
$
|
(1,927,000
|
)
|
$
|
(457,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,472,000
|
|||||
Per
unit amounts:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted (loss) income from continuing operation allocable to unit
holders
|
$
|
(19.42
|
)
|
$
|
(4.59
|
)
|
$
|
11.57
|
||||
Basic
and diluted income from discontinued operations allocable to unit
holders
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
3.16
|
||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average units outstanding
|
99,218
|
99,618
|
99,930
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-5
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
STATEMENTS
OF MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
$ | 39,135,000 | ||
Cash
distributions to unit holders
|
(2,500,000 | ) | ||
Cash
distributions to managing member
|
(262,000 | ) | ||
Units
repurchased and retired
|
(122,000 | ) | ||
Net
income
|
1,636,000 | |||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
$ | 37,887,000 | ||
Cash
distributions to unit holders
|
(3,493,000 | ) | ||
Cash
distributions to managing member
|
(186,000 | ) | ||
Units
repurchased and retired
|
(161,000 | ) | ||
Net
loss
|
(508,000 | ) | ||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 33,539,000 | ||
Cash
distributions to unit holders
|
(2,479,000 | ) | ||
Cash
distributions to managing member
|
(192,000 | ) | ||
Units
repurchased and retired
|
(186,000 | ) | ||
Net
loss
|
(2,141,000 | ) | ||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
$ | 28,541,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-6
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(2,141,000
|
)
|
$
|
(508,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,636,000
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
gain on sale of real estate
|
—
|
—
|
(306,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
947,000
|
1,049,000
|
1,053,000
|
|||||||||
Provision
for bad debts
|
107,000
|
68,000
|
27,000
|
|||||||||
Impairment
of real estate
|
3,096,000
|
1,808,000
|
—
|
|||||||||
Straight-line
rent and amortization of acquired above/below market
leases
|
(30,000
|
)
|
(39,000
|
)
|
(116,000
|
)
|
||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Other
assets, net
|
(292,000
|
)
|
(110,000
|
)
|
(78,000
|
)
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(124,000
|
)
|
(22,000
|
)
|
(190,000
|
)
|
||||||
Real
estate taxes payable
|
14,000
|
(9,000
|
)
|
34,000
|
||||||||
Tenant
security deposits
|
(39,000
|
)
|
(21,000
|
)
|
14,000
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
1,538,000
|
2,216,000
|
2,074,000
|
|||||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Net
proceeds received from sale of real estate
|
—
|
—
|
2,925,000
|
|||||||||
Additions
to real estate
|
(209,000
|
)
|
(288,000
|
)
|
(163,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(209,000
|
)
|
(288,000
|
)
|
2,762,000
|
|||||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Cash
distributions to unit holders
|
(2,479,000
|
)
|
(3,493,000
|
)
|
(2,500,000
|
)
|
||||||
Cash
distributions to managing member
|
(192,000
|
)
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(262,000
|
|||||||
Units
repurchased and retired
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(161,000
|
)
|
(122,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(2,857,000
|
)
|
(3,840,000
|
)
|
(2,884,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash
|
(1,528,000
|
)
|
(1,912,000
|
)
|
1,952,000
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of year
|
2,289,000
|
4,201,000
|
2,249,000
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents - end of year
|
$
|
761,000
|
$
|
2,289,000
|
$
|
4,201,000
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Accrued
real estate additions
|
$
|
12,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-7
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
Organization and
Business
|
Cornerstone
Realty Fund, LLC, a California limited liability company (the “Fund”), was
formed on October 28, 1998. The members of the Fund are Cornerstone
Industrial Properties, LLC, a California limited liability company (“CIP”), as
the Managing Member (“Managing Member”), Terry G. Roussel, an individual, and
other various unit holders as described below. The purpose of the
Fund is to acquire, operate and sell multi-tenant industrial
properties.
The
operating agreement, as amended and restated, provides, among other things, for
the following:
|
—
|
CIP
generally has complete and exclusive discretion in the management and
control of our operations; however, unit holders holding the majority of
all outstanding and issued units have certain specified voting rights
which include the removal and replacement of the Managing
Member.
|
|
—
|
Net
Cash Flow from Operations, as defined, will be distributed 90% to the unit
holders and 10% to the Managing Member until the unit holders have
received either an 8% or 12% cumulative, non-compounded annual return on
their invested capital contributions, as defined. The 12%
return applies to specified early investors for the twelve-month period
subsequent to the date of their invested capital contributions and is in
lieu of the 8% return during that
period.
|
|
—
|
Net
Sales Proceeds, as defined, will be distributed first, 100% to the unit
holders in an amount equal to their Invested Capital Contributions; then,
90% to the unit holders and 10% to the Managing Member until the unit
holders have received an amount equal to the unpaid balance of their
aggregate cumulative, non-compounded annual return on their invested
capital contributions; and thereafter, 50% to the unit holders and 50% to
the Managing Member.
|
|
—
|
Net
Income, as defined, is allocated first, 10% to the Managing Member and 90%
to the unit holders until net income allocated equals cumulative net
losses, as defined, previously allocated in such proportions; second, in
proportion to and to the extent of net cash flow from operations and net
sales proceeds previously distributed to the members, exclusive of
distributions representing a return of invested capital contributions; and
then 50% to the Managing Member and 50% to the unit
holders.
|
|
—
|
Net
Loss is allocated first, 50% to the Managing Member and 50% to the unit
holders, until net loss allocated equals cumulative net income previously
allocated in such proportions; then remaining net loss is allocated 10% to
the Managing Member and 90% to the unit
holders.
|
|
—
|
All
allocations and distributions to the unit holders are to be pro rata in
proportion to their ownership
shares.
|
|
—
|
Effective
February 22, 2007, the Fund’s operating agreement was amended to permit
repurchase of units on such terms and conditions as the Managing Member
may determine.
|
|
—
|
Effective
June 2, 2009, the Fund’s operating agreement was amended and the
dissolution date was extended from December 31, 2010 to December 31,
2012.
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The
summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist
in understanding the financial statements. Such financial statements and
accompanying notes are the representations of management, who is responsible for
their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all
material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the
accompanying financial statements.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
materially from the estimates in the near term.
F-8
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents consist primarily of interest-bearing investments with original
maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. The Company
places its cash with major financial institutions. At times, cash
balances may be in excess of amounts insured by Federal agencies.
Investments
in Real Estate
Upon
acquisition of a property, the Fund allocates the purchase price of the property
based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of
land, buildings, site improvements and intangible lease assets or liabilities
including in-place leases and above market and below market
leases. The Fund allocated the purchase price to the fair value of
the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it
were vacant. The value of the building is depreciated over an estimated useful
life of 39 years.
In-place
lease values are calculated based on management’s evaluation of the specific
characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place lease
intangibles, which are included as a component of investments in real estate, is
amortized to expense over the average expected lease term.
Acquired
above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the
difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the
remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is
amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an
adjustment to rental revenue on the Fund’s statements of
operations.
The Fund
reviews each real estate asset owned to determine whether the carrying
amount of the asset can be recovered. Based on current market conditions
and management’s assessment of the market value of its properties, the Fund
recorded impairment charges of $1.9 million, $1.2 million and $1.8 million in
the fourth quarter of 2009, third quarter of 2009 and fourth quarter of 2008,
respectively. There was
no impairment charge taken in the year ended December 31, 2007.
Investments
in Real Estate Assets Held-for- Sale
The Fund
evaluates the held-for-sale classification of its owned real estate each
quarter. Assets that are classified as held-for-sale are recorded at
the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. Assets are generally classified as held-for-sale once
management commits to a plan to sell the Properties and has initiated an active
program to market them for sale. The results of operations of these
real estate properties are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods
reported. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
none of the Fund’s properties were classified as held-for-sale.
Leasing
Commissions
Leasing
commissions are stated at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the
related lease term. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Fund
had recorded approximately $324,000 and $289,000 in leasing commissions,
respectively. The unamortized portion of this asset was approximately
$180,000 at December 31, 2009 and $161,000 at December 31, 2008.
Revenue
Recognition and Valuation of Receivables
Revenue
is recorded in accordance with ASC 840-10, Leases, and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, as amended” (“SAB 104”). Revenue is recognized
when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the
rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured
collectability. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally
recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a
collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with
contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash
rental payments due for the period. Because the Fund’s leases may provide for
free rent, lease incentives, or other rental increases at specified intervals,
the Fund straight-line the recognition of revenue, which results in the
recording of a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. The Fund’s
revenues are comprised largely of rental income and other income collected from
tenants. Management is required to determine, in its judgment, to what
extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is
collectible. Management reviews unbilled rent receivable on a
quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the
financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which
the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is
located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with
respect to any given tenant is in doubt, the Fund records an increase in its
allowance for doubtful accounts or records a direct write-off of the specific
rent receivable.
Accounts
Receivable
We
periodically evaluate the collectability of amounts due from tenants and
maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from
the inability of tenants to make required payments under lease
agreements. The Fund exercises judgment in establishing these
allowances and considers payment history and current credit status of its
tenants in developing these estimates. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts was $190,000 and $105,000 as of December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
F-9
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standare Codification
(ASC) 820-10, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair
value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies prospectively to all other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The
adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on the Fund’s financial
statements since it does not record its financial assets and liabilities in its
financial statements at fair value. The Funds adopted ASC 820-10 with
respect to its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1,
2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10 with respect to its non-financial assets and
liabilities did not have a material impact on its financial
statements.
The
following table summarizes the two properties that were measured at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis:
Total Fair Value
Measurement
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total Losses
Three
Months
Ended
December
31, 2009
|
Total Losses
for the Year
Ended
December
31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investments
in real estate
|
$
|
9,222,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
9,222,000
|
$
|
(1,880,000
|
)
|
$
|
(3,096,000
|
)
|
ASC
825-10, Financial Instruments,
requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial
instruments whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet, for
which it is practical to estimate that value.
The Fund
generally determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using
quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or
using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as
discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate
information for similar types of instruments and its estimates for
non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected
by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and
estimates of future cash flow.
The Fund
‘s balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash
equivalents, tenant and other receivables, tenant security deposits,
real estate taxes payable, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities. We consider the carrying values of cash and cash
equivalents, tenant and other receivables, tenant security deposits,
accounts payable, real estate taxes payable and accrued liabilities to
approximate fair value for these financial instruments because of the short
period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected
payment.
Income
Tax Matters
It is the
intent of the Fund and its members that the Fund be treated as a partnership for
income tax purposes. As a limited liability company, the Fund is
subject to certain minimal taxes and fees, including California state income
taxes on limited liability companies; however, income taxes on the income or
losses realized by the Fund are generally the obligation of the
members.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit
risk are primarily cash investments; cash is generally invested in
investment-grade short-term instruments. Currently, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, generally insures amounts up to $250,000 per
depositor per insured bank. This amount is scheduled to be reduced to $100,000
after December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2009, we had cash
accounts in excess of FDIC insured limits.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.
Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification became
effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification did not have a
material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
F-10
In
June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting literature with respect to the
consolidation of VIEs. The new guidance impacts the consolidation guidance
applicable to VIEs and among other things require a qualitative rather than a
quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE, continuous
assessments of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and
enhanced disclosures about a company’s involvement with a VIE. The new
guidance applies to the Fund’s fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2010 and
early adoption is prohibited. The Fund adopted the guidance on January 1,
2010, and the adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standard Update to address
implementation issues associated with the accounting for decreases in the
ownership of a subsidiary. The new guidance clarified the scope of the entities
covered by the guidance related to accounting for decreases in the ownership of
a subsidiary and specifically excluded in-substance real estate or conveyances
of oil and gas mineral rights from the scope. Additionally, the new
guidance expands the disclosures required for a business combination achieved in
stages and deconsolidation of a business or nonprofit activity. The new guidance
became effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after
December 31, 2009 and must be applied on a retrospective basis to the first
period that an entity adopted the new guidance related to noncontrolling
interests. The Fund adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010 and the
adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
Reclassification
Certain
previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation. These immaterial reclassification had no impact on previously
reported financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
3.
|
Investments
in Real Estate
|
As of
December 31, 2009, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to
investments in real estate and related lease intangibles were as follows:
Land
|
Buildings and
Improvements
|
Intangible
Lease
Value
|
Acquired
In-Place
Lease
|
Acquired
Below-
Market
Leases
|
||||||||||||||||
Investments
in real estate
|
$ | 10,443,000 | $ | 19,689,000 | $ | 108,000 | $ | 770,000 | $ | (155,000 | ) | |||||||||
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
— | (2,314,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | (761,000 | ) | 150,000 | ||||||||||||
Net
Investments in real estate
|
$ | 10,443,000 | $ | 17,375,000 | $ | 106,000 | $ | 9,000 | $ | (5,000 | ) |
As of
December 31, 2008, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to
investments in real estate and related lease intangibles were as
follows:
Land
|
Buildings and
Improvements
|
Intangible
Lease
Value
|
In-Place
Lease
Value
|
Acquired
Below-
Market
Leases
|
||||||||||||||||
Investments
in real estate
|
$ | 11,474,000 | $ | 22,511,000 | $ | 365,000 | $ | 894,000 | $ | (155,000 | ) | |||||||||
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
— | (2,626,000 | ) | (167,000 | ) | (810,000 | ) | 123,000 | ||||||||||||
Net
Investments in real estate
|
$ | 11,474,000 | $ | 19,885,000 | $ | 198,000 | $ | 84,000 | $ | (32,000 | ) |
Depreciation
and amortization expense associated with investments in real estate and related
lease intangibles were $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.1 million in 2009, 2008
and, 2007 respectively.
Anticipated
amortization of lease intangibles for each of the five following years ended
December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Lease
Intangibles
|
||||
2010
|
$
|
14,000
|
||
2011
|
11,000
|
|||
2012
|
11,000
|
|||
2013
|
7,000
|
|||
2014
|
4,000
|
|||
Thereafter
|
63,000
|
|||
$
|
110,000
|
F-11
Future
Minimum Lease
The
future minimum lease payments to be received under existing operating leases for
the six properties owned as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Years ending December 31,
|
||||
2010
|
$ | 2,006,000 | ||
2011
|
1,237,000 | |||
2012
|
630,000 | |||
2013
|
109,000 | |||
2014
|
26,000 | |||
2015
and thereafter
|
401,000 | |||
$ | 4,409,000 |
Industrial
space in the properties is generally leased to tenants under lease terms that
provide for the tenants to pay increases in operating expenses in excess of
specified amounts. The above future minimum lease payments do not
include specified payments for tenant reimbursements of operating
expenses.
4.
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the total incentive share of
net cash flow from operations paid to the Fund’s Managing Member was
$192,000, $186,000 and $262,000, respectively.
5.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Fund
monitors its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic
substances. While there can be no assurance that a material
environmental liability does not exist, the Fund is not currently aware of any
environmental liability with respect to the properties that would have a
material effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Further, the Fund is not aware of any environmental liability
or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability
that the Fund believes would require additional disclosure or the recording of a
loss contingency.
The
Fund’s commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real
estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact
on its financial position, cash flows and results of operations. The
Fund is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to its
knowledge, any material litigation threatened against the Fund which if
determined unfavorably to the Fund would have a material adverse effect on its
cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
6.
|
Quarterly Financial Data
(unaudited)
|
Set forth
below is certain unaudited quarterly financial information. We believe that all
necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have
been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly, and in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, the selected quarterly
information when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements.
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
923,000
|
$
|
929,000
|
$
|
919,000
|
$
|
862,000
|
||||||||
Net income
(loss) from continuing operations allocable to unit
holders:
|
$
|
236,000
|
$
|
247,000
|
$
|
(854,000
|
)(a)
|
$
|
(1,553,000
|
)(a)
|
||||||
Per
unit amounts:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
2.38
|
$
|
2.49
|
$
|
(8.62
|
)
|
$
|
(15.70
|
)
|
||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average units outstanding
|
99,333
|
99,231
|
99,127
|
98,934
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
1,030,000
|
$
|
1,024,000
|
$
|
1,006,000
|
$
|
973,000
|
||||||||
Net income
(loss) from continuing operations allocable to unit
holders:
|
$
|
311,000
|
$
|
229,000
|
$
|
322,000
|
$
|
(1,319,000
|
)(a)
|
|||||||
Per
unit amounts:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$
|
3.12
|
$
|
2.30
|
$
|
3.24
|
$
|
(13.27
|
)
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average units outstanding
|
99,683
|
99,598
|
99,498
|
99,429
|
(a)
|
Includes impairment charge of
$1.9 million during
the fourth quarter of 2009, $1.2 million during the third
quarter of 2009 and
$1.8 million, during
the fourth quarter of
2008.
|
F-12
7.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
We report
results of operations from real estate assets that meet the definition of a
component of an entity that have been sold, or meet the criteria to be
classified as held for sale, as discontinued operations. As of October 1, 2006,
we determined that the potential sale of Sky Harbor Business Park to a third
party was probable and classified it as held for sale. This property
was sold on April 16, 2007. We included all results of these
discontinued operations in a separate component of income on the statements of
operations under the heading Income from Discontinued Operations.
The
following is a summary of the components of income from discontinued operations
for the year ended December 31, 2007:
2007
|
||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
120,000
|
||
Operating
expenses and real estate taxes
|
75,000
|
|||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
45,000
|
|||
Gain
on sale of real estate
|
$
|
306,000
|
8.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
During
the period between January 1, 2010 and March 19, 2010, we repurchased and
retired 144 units for approximately $50,000.
In March
2010, the Fund listed Zenith Drive Centre for sale. The decision was based
on our evaluation of Chicago real estate market dynamics which we
believe indicated that the value of the asset has been
maximized.
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
investment in real estate assets associated with Zenith Drive
Centre
|
$ | 1,726,000 | $ | 3,002,000 | ||||
Liabilities
associated with Zenith Drive Centre
|
$ | 261,000 | $ | 275,000 |
F-13
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
Schedule
II
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December
31, 2009
Description
|
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
|
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
|
Deductions
|
Balance at
End of
Period
|
||||||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 58,000 | $ | 27,000 | $ | (13,000 | ) | $ | 72,000 | |||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 72,000 | $ | 68,000 | $ | (35,000 | ) | $ | 105,000 | |||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 105,000 | $ | 107,000 | $ | (22,000 | ) | $ | 190,000 |
F-14
CORNERSTONE
REALTY FUND, LLC
(a
California limited liability company)
Schedule
III
REAL
ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December
31, 2009
Initial
Cost to
Fund
|
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
|
Gross
Amount
Invested
|
Life
on
which
Depreciation
in
Latest
Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Land
|
Building
and
Improvements
|
Improvements
|
Carry
Costs
|
Impairment
|
Land
|
Building
and
Improvements
|
Total
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Date
of
Construction
|
Date
Acquired
|
Statement
is
Computed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments
in
Real Estate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Normandie
Business
Center
Torrance,
CA
|
$ | 1,783,000 | $ | 2,206,000 | $ | 135,000 | — | $ | — | $ | 1,783,000 | $ | 2,341,000 | $ | 4,124,000 | $ | 547,000 |
1989
|
09/27/02
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arrow
Business Center Irwindale, CA
|
2,338,000 | 3,660,000 | 194,000 | — | — | 2,338,000 | 3,854,000 | 6,192,000 | 797,000 |
1987
|
12/10/03
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zenith
Business Center Chicago, IL
|
908,000 | 3,792,000 | 184,000 | — | (2,764,000 | ) | 355,000 | 1,278,000 | 1,633,000 | 13,000 |
1978
|
01/25/05
|
34
years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paramount
Business Center Paramount, CA
|
1,100,000 | 1,926,000 | 96,000 | — | — | 1,100,000 | 2,022,000 | 3,122,000 | 258,000 |
1985
|
04/28/05
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interstate
Commerce Center Tempe, AZ
|
1,750,000 | 5,495,000 | 328,000 | — | — | 1,750,000 | 5,823,000 | 7,573,000 | 699,000 |
1987
|
09/30/05
|
39
years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shoemaker
Ave, Santa Fe Springs, CA
|
3,900,000 | 5,994,000 | 41 ,000 | — | (1,880,000 | ) | 3,117,000 | 4,371,000 | 7,488,000 | — |
1974
|
06/28/06
|
36
years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 11,779,000 | $ | 23,073,000 | $ | 978,000 | — | $ | (4,644,000 | ) | $ | 10,443,000 | $ | 19,689,000 | $ | 30,132,000 | $ | 2,314,000 |
F-15
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
$
|
38,023,000
|
$
|
(1,368,000
|
)
|
|||
2007
Sale of real estate
|
(2,866,000
|
)
|
248,000
|
|||||
2007
Additions
|
163,000
|
(732,000
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
35,320,000
|
$
|
(1,852,000
|
)
|
|||
2008
Impairment of real estate
|
(1,623,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
2008
Additions
|
288,000
|
(774,000
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
33,985,000
|
$
|
(2,626,000
|
)
|
|||
2009
Impairment of real estate
|
(4,074,000
|
)
|
1,053,000
|
|||||
2009
Additions
|
221,000
|
(741,000
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
30,132,000
|
$
|
(2,314,000
|
)
|
(b) For
federal income tax purposes, the aggregate cost of the Fund’s 6 properties is
approximately $35.7 million.
F-16