Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Riverview Financial Corpa09-36283_1ex31d2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Riverview Financial Corpa09-36283_1ex32d1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Riverview Financial Corpa09-36283_1ex31d1.htm
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - Riverview Financial Corpa09-36283_1ex21d1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Riverview Financial Corpa09-36283_1ex32d2.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(D) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number 333-153486-99

 

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Pennsylvania

 

26-3853402

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

 

 

3rd and Market Streets
Halifax, Pennsylvania

 

17032

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 717.896.3433

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None.

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File, required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (d 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o   No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One).

 

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated Filer o

 

 

Non-accelerated Filer o

Smaller Reporting Company x

 

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o   No x

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, on June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $20,934,000.

 

As of March 18, 2010, the registrant had 1,750,003 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

PAGE

PART I

 

 

Item 1-

Business

1

 

 

 

Item 1A-

Risk Factors

12

 

 

 

Item 1B-

Unresolved Staff Comments

12

 

 

 

Item 2 -

Properties

13

 

 

 

Item 3 -

Legal Proceedings

13

 

 

 

Item 4 -

(Removed and Reserved)

13

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

Item 5 -

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

14

 

 

 

Item 6 -

Selected Financial Data

14

 

 

 

Item 7 -

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15

 

 

 

Item 7A -

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

37

 

 

 

Item 8 -

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

38

 

 

 

Item 9 -

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

80

 

 

 

Item 9A(T)

Controls and Procedures

80

 

 

 

Item 9B-

Other Information

81

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

Item 10 -

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

81

 

 

 

Item 11 -

Executive Compensation

85

 

 

 

Item 12 -

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

88

 

 

 

Item 13 -

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

90

 

 

 

Item 14 -

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

91

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

Item 15 -

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

92

 

 

 

Signatures

 

95

 

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

97

 



Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

 

The disclosures set forth in this Item are qualified by the section captioned “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” contained in Part II, Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and other cautionary statements are set forth elsewhere in this report.

 

Riverview Financial Corporation

 

Riverview Financial Corporation is a one bank holding company, incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on December 31, 2008 and is headquartered in Halifax, Pennsylvania.

 

Riverview was formed upon the consolidation of First Perry Bancorp, Inc., Marysville, Pennsylvania, and HNB Bancorp, Inc., Halifax, Pennsylvania.  Riverview is a registered bank holding company and its sole business is to act as a holding company for Riverview National Bank.

 

Riverview National Bank

 

Riverview National Bank was formed upon the consolidation of the charters of The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank on December 31, 2008 and is headquartered in Marysville, Pennsylvania.  However, after the consolidation, the branches of The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank continue to operate under their current names as trade names of Riverview National Bank.

 

Riverview National Bank is a full service commercial bank providing a wide range of services to individuals and small to medium sized businesses in its Central Pennsylvania market area of Perry and Dauphin counties.  Riverview National Bank’s commercial banking activities include accepting time, demand, and savings deposits and making secured and unsecured commercial, real estate and consumer loans.

 

Supervision and Regulation of Riverview

 

The Holding Company Act of 1956.  Riverview is subject to the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and to supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.  The following restrictions apply:

 

· General Supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.  As a bank holding company, Riverview’s activities are limited to the business of banking and activities closely related or incidental to banking.  Bank holding companies are required to file periodic reports with and are subject to examination by the Federal Reserve Board.  The Federal Reserve Board has adopted a risk-focused supervision program for small shell bank holding companies that is tied to the examination results of the subsidiary bank.  The Federal Reserve Board has issued regulations under the Holding Company Act that require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks.  As a result, the Federal Reserve Board may require that Riverview stand ready to provide adequate capital funds to Riverview National Bank during periods of financial stress or adversity.

 

· Restrictions on Acquiring Control of other Banks and Companies.  A bank holding company may not:

 

· acquire direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting stock, or substantially all of the assets of, any bank, or

 

1



Table of Contents

 

· merge or consolidate with another bank holding company,

 

without prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board.

 

In addition, a bank holding company may not:

 

· engage in a non-banking business, or

· acquire ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting stock of any company engaged in a non-banking business,

 

unless the business is determined by the Federal Reserve Board to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to banking.  In making this determination, the Federal Reserve Board considers whether these activities offer benefits to the public that outweigh any possible adverse effects.

 

· Anti-Tie-In Provisions.  A bank holding company and its subsidiaries may not engage in tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services.  These anti-tie-in provisions state generally that a bank may not:

 

· extend credit,

 

· lease or sell property, or

 

· furnish any service to a customer

 

on the condition that the customer provides additional credit or service to a bank or its affiliates, or on the condition that the customer does not obtain other credit or service from a competitor of the bank.

 

· Restrictions on Extensions of Credit by Banks to their Holding Companies.  Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are also subject to restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on:

 

· any extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries,

 

· investments in the stock or other securities of the corporation, and

 

· taking these stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower.

 

· Risk-Based Capital Guidelines.  Generally, bank holding companies must comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines.  However, small bank holding companies are sometimes eligible for certain exemptions.  The required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets, including some off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit, is 8%.  At least half of the total capital is required to be Tier I Capital, consisting principally of common stockholders’ equity, less certain intangible assets.  The remainder, Tier II Capital, may consist of:

 

· some types of preferred stock,

 

· a limited amount of subordinated debt,

 

· some hybrid capital instruments,

 

· other debt securities, and

 

· a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

The risk-based capital guidelines are required to take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk, and risks of nontraditional activities.

 

· Capital Leverage Ratio Requirements.  The Federal Reserve Board requires a bank holding company to maintain a leverage ratio of a minimum level of Tier I capital, as determined under the risk-based capital guidelines, equal to 3% of average total consolidated assets for those bank holding companies that have the highest regulatory examination rating and are not contemplating or experiencing significant growth or expansion.  All other bank holding companies are required to maintain a ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the stated minimum.  Riverview National Bank is subject to similar capital requirements pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

 

· Restrictions on Control Changes.  The Change in Bank Control Act of 1978 requires persons seeking control of a bank or bank holding company to obtain approval from the appropriate federal banking agency before completing the transaction.  The law contains a presumption that the power to vote 10% or more of voting stock confers control of a bank or bank holding company.  The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for reviewing changes in control of bank holding companies.  In doing so, the Federal Reserve Board reviews the financial position, experience and integrity of the acquiring person and the effect on the financial condition of the corporation, relevant markets and federal deposit insurance funds.

 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act represents a comprehensive revision of laws affecting corporate governance, accounting obligations and corporate reporting.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is applicable to all companies with equity or debt securities registered or that file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  In particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act establishes: (i) requirements for audit committees, including independence, expertise, and responsibilities; (ii) additional responsibilities regarding financial statements for the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the reporting company; (iii) standards for auditors and regulation of audits; (iv) increased disclosure and reporting obligations for the reporting company and its directors and executive officers; and (v) increased civil and criminal penalties for violations of the securities laws.  Many of the provisions were effective immediately while other provisions become effective over a period of time and are subject to rulemaking by the SEC.  Because neither First Perry’s nor HNB’s common stock was registered with the SEC, they were not subject to the 1934 Act.  However, Riverview is subject to the 1934 Act.

 

Permitted Activities for Bank Holding Companies

 

The Federal Reserve Board permits bank holding companies to engage in activities so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident of banking.  In 1997, the Federal Reserve Board significantly expanded its list of permissible non-banking activities to improve the competitiveness of bank holding companies.  The following list includes activities that a holding company may engage in, subject to change by the Federal Reserve Board:

 

· Making, acquiring or servicing loans and other extensions of credit for its own account or for the account of others.

 

· Any activity used in connection with making, acquiring, brokering, or servicing loans or other extensions of credit, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board.  The Federal Reserve Board has determined that the following activities are permissible:

 

· real estate and personal property appraising;

· arranging commercial real estate equity financing;

· check-guaranty services;

· collection agency services;

· credit bureau services;

· asset management, servicing, and collection activities;

 

3



Table of Contents

 

· acquiring debt in default, if a holding company divests shares or assets securing debt in default that are not permissible investments for bank holding companies within prescribed time periods, and meets various other conditions; and

· real estate settlement services.

 

· Leasing personal and real property or acting as agent, broker, or advisor in leasing property, provided that:

 

· the lease is a non-operating lease;

· the initial term of the lease is at least 90 days;

· if real property is being leased, the transaction will compensate the lessor for at least the lessor’s full investment in the property and costs, with various other conditions.

 

· Operating nonbank depository institutions, including an industrial bank or savings association.

 

· Performing functions or activities that may be performed by a trust company, including activities of a fiduciary, agency or custodial nature, in the manner authorized by federal or state law, so long as the holding company is not a bank.

 

· Acting as investment or financial advisor to any person, including:

 

· serving as investment advisor to an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940;

 

· furnishing general economic information and advice, general economic statistical forecasting services, and industry studies;

 

· providing advice in connection with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, investments, joint ventures, capital structuring, financing transactions, and conducting financial feasibility studies;

 

· providing general information, statistical forecasting, and advice concerning any transaction in foreign exchange, swaps and similar transactions, commodities, and options, futures and similar instruments;

 

· providing educational courses and instructional materials to consumers on individual financial management matters; and

 

· providing tax planning and tax preparation services to any person.

 

· Agency transactional services for customer investments, including:

 

· Securities brokerage—Providing securities brokerage services, whether alone or in combination with investment advisory services, and incidental activities, including related securities credit activities compliant with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and custodial services, if the securities brokerage services are restricted to buying and selling securities solely as agent for the account of customers and do not include securities underwriting or dealing;

 

· Riskless-principal transactions—Buying and selling all types of securities in the secondary market on the order of customers as ‘‘riskless principal’’;

 

· Private-placement services—Acting as agent for the private placement of securities in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules of the SEC; and

 

4



Table of Contents

 

· Futures commission merchant—Acting as a futures commission merchant for unaffiliated persons in the execution and clearance of any futures contract and option on a futures contract traded on an exchange in the United States or abroad, if the activity is conducted through a separately incorporated subsidiary of the holding company and the company satisfies various other conditions.

 

· Investment transactions as principal:

 

· Underwriting and dealing in government obligations and money market instruments, including bankers’ acceptances and certificates of deposit, under the same limitations applicable if the activity were performed by a holding company’s subsidiary member banks.

 

· Engaging as principal in:

 

· foreign exchanges, and

· forward contracts, options, futures, options on futures, swaps, and similar contracts, with various conditions.

 

· Buying and selling bullion, and related activities.

 

· Management consulting and counseling activities:

 

· Subject to various limitations, management consulting on any matter to unaffiliated depository institutions, or on any financial, economic, accounting, or audit matter to any other company; and

 

· Providing consulting services to employee benefit, compensation, and insurance plans, including designing plans, assisting in the implementation of plans, providing administrative services to plans, and developing employee communication programs for plans.

 

· Providing career counseling services to:

 

· a financial organization and individuals currently employed by, or recently displaced from, a financial organization;

 

· individuals who are seeking employment at a financial organization; and

 

· individuals who are currently employed in or who seek positions in the finance, accounting, and audit departments of any company.

 

· Support services:

 

· providing limited courier services; and

 

· printing and selling checks and related items requiring magnetic ink character recognition.

 

· Insurance agency and underwriting:

 

· Subject to various limitations, acting as principal, agent, or broker for credit life, accident health and unemployment insurance that is directly related to an extension of credit to a holding company or any of its subsidiaries;

 

· Engaging in any insurance agency activity in a place where Riverview or a subsidiary of Riverview has a lending office and that has a population not exceeding 5,000 or has inadequate insurance agency facilities, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board;

 

5



Table of Contents

 

· Supervising, on behalf of insurance underwriters, the activities of retail insurance agents who sell fidelity insurance and property and casualty insurance on the real and personal property used in Riverview’s operations or its subsidiaries, and group insurance that protects the employees of Riverview or its subsidiaries;

 

· Engaging in any insurance agency activities if Riverview has total consolidated assets of $50 million or less, with the sale of life insurance and annuities being limited to sales in small towns or as credit insurance.

 

· Making equity and debt investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare, and providing advisory services to these programs.

 

· Subject to various limitations, providing others financially oriented data processing or bookkeeping services.

 

· Issuing and selling money orders, travelers’ checks and United States savings bonds.

 

· Providing consumer financial counseling that involves counseling, educational courses and distribution of instructional materials to individuals on consumer-oriented financial management matters, including debt consolidation, mortgage applications, bankruptcy, budget management, real estate tax shelters, tax planning, retirement and estate planning, insurance and general investment management, so long as this activity does not include the sale of specific products or investments.

 

· Providing tax planning and preparation advice.

 

Permitted Activities for Financial Holding Companies

 

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, became law in November 1999, and amends the Holding Company Act of 1956 to create a new category of holding company—the financial holding company.  To be designated as a financial holding company, a bank holding company must file an application with the Federal Reserve Board.  In order to become a financial holding company, Riverview must be and remain well capitalized and well managed, as determined by Federal Reserve Board regulations and maintain at least a ‘‘satisfactory’’ examination rating under the Community Reinvestment Act.  Once a bank holding company becomes a financial holding company, the holding company or its affiliates may engage in any financial activities that are financial in nature or incidental to financial activities.  Furthermore, the Federal Reserve may approve a proposed activity if it is complementary to financial activities and does not threaten the safety and soundness of banking.  The Act provides an initial list of activities that constitute activities that are financial in nature, including:

 

· lending and deposit activities,

 

· insurance activities, including underwriting, agency and brokerage,

 

· providing financial investment advisory services,

 

· underwriting in, and acting as a broker or dealer in, securities,

 

· merchant banking, and

 

· insurance company portfolio investment.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

Supervision and Regulation of Riverview National Bank

 

General Overview

 

Banks operate in a highly regulated environment and are regularly examined by federal and state regulatory authorities.  The following discussion concerns various federal and state laws and regulations and the potential impact of such laws and regulations on Riverview National Bank.

 

To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions themselves.  Proposals to change laws and regulations are frequently introduced in Congress, the state legislatures, and before the various bank regulatory agencies.  We cannot determine the likelihood or timing of any such proposals or legislation, or the impact they may have on Riverview National Bank.  A change in law, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on Riverview National Bank’s business.

 

The operations of Riverview National Bank are subject to federal and state statutes applicable to banks chartered under the banking laws of the United States, to members of the Federal Reserve System, and to banks whose deposits are insured by the FDIC.  Riverview National Bank operations are subject to regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the FDIC.

 

Safety and Soundness

 

The primary regulator for Riverview National Bank is the OCC.  The OCC has the authority under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prevent a national bank from engaging in any unsafe or unsound practice in conducting business or from otherwise conducting activities in violation of the law.

 

Federal and state banking laws and regulations govern, but are not limited to, the following:

 

· Scope of a bank’s business

 

· Investments a bank may make

 

· Reserves that must be maintained against certain deposits

 

· Loans a bank makes and collateral it takes

 

· Merger and consolidation activities

 

· Establishment of branches

 

Riverview National Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and, therefore, the policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board have a significant impact on many elements of Riverview National Bank’s operations including:

 

· Loan and deposit growth

 

· Rate of interest earned and paid

 

· Levels of liquidity

 

· Levels of required capital

 

7



Table of Contents

 

Management cannot predict the effect of changes to such policies and regulations upon Riverview National Bank’s business model and the corresponding impact they may have on future earnings.

 

FDIC Insurance Assessments

 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) imposes an assessment against financial institutions for deposit insurance.  The FDIC imposes a risk-related premium schedule for all insured depository institutions that results in the assessment of premiums based on a bank’s capital and supervisory measures.  Under the risk-related premium schedule, the FDIC assigns, on a semiannual basis, each depository institution to one of three capital groups, the best of these being well capitalized.  For purposes of calculating the insurance assessment, Riverview National Bank is expected to be well capitalized.  The FDIC adjusts the insurance rates every six months and has indicated the possibility that all banks may again be required to pay deposit insurance premiums in the future if current trends related to insured deposits versus insurance funds continue.

 

Federal law requires that the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund be established by the FDIC at 1.15% to 1.50% of estimated insured deposits.  If this reserve ratio drops below 1.15% or the FDIC expects that it will do so within six months, the FDIC must, within 90 days, establish and implement a plan to restore the designated reserve ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits within five years (absent extraordinary circumstances).

 

Recent bank failures coupled with deteriorating economic conditions have significantly reduced the deposit insurance fund’s reserve ratio.  As of June 30, 2008, the designated reserve ratio was 1.01% of estimated insured deposits as of March 31, 2008.  As a result of this reduced reserve ratio, on October 16, 2008, the FDIC published a proposed rule that would restore the ratio to its required level of 1.15% within five years.  On February 27, 2009, the FDIC took action to extend the restoration plan horizon to seven years.

 

The amended restoration plan was accompanied by a final rule that sets assessment rates and makes adjustments that improve how the assessment system differentiates for risk.  Currently, most banks are in the best risk category and pay anywhere from 12 to 14 cents per $100 of deposits for insurance.  Under the final rule, banks in this category pay initial base rates ranging from 12 to 16 cents per $100 of deposits on an annual basis beginning April 1, 2009.

 

The FDIC also imposed a 5 basis point emergency special assessment on the banking industry on June 30, 2009, where the assessment was required to be accrued during the second quarter of 2009 and paid on September 30, 2009.  All FDIC insured financial institutions were required to pay the special assessment.

 

On November 12, 2009 the FDIC approved a final rule requiring banks to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated quarterly assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, as well as all of 2010, 2011 and 2012.  The assessment rate that was used for the entire period was the Bank’s base assessment rate that was in effect as of September 30, 2009.  The rate will be increased by 3 basis points for all of 2011 and 2012 based on the FDIC’s expectation that industry earnings will be stronger.  Each institution recorded the entire amount of its prepaid assessment as a prepaid expense (asset) as of December 31, 2009.  As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, each institution records an expense (charge to earnings) for its regular quarterly assessment for the quarter and an offsetting credit to the prepaid assessment until the asset is exhausted.  Once the asset is exhausted, the institution will record an accrued expense payable each quarter for the assessment payment, which will be paid in arrears to the FDIC at the end of the following quarter.  If the prepaid assessment is not exhausted by December 31, 2014, any remaining amount will be returned to the depository institution.

 

FDIC Insurance

 

As a member institution of the FDIC, deposit accounts at the bank were insured generally up to a maximum of $100,000 for each separately insured depositor, and up to a maximum of $250,000 for self-

 

8



Table of Contents

 

directed retirement accounts.  In 2009, the FDIC increased the deposit insurance available on all deposit accounts to $250,000, effective until December 31, 2013.  Additionally, certain non-interest-bearing transaction accounts maintained with financial institutions participating in the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLG Program”) are fully insured regardless of the dollar amount until June 30, 2010.  The FDIC implemented the TLG Program on November 21, 2008.

 

Community Reinvestment Act

 

All FDIC insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act (‘‘CRA’’) and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.  The OCC, which is a governmental agency that overviews national banks, is required to assess all financial institutions that it regulates to determine whether these institutions are meeting the credit needs of the community that they serve.  The Act focuses specifically on low and moderate-income neighborhoods.  The OCC takes an institution’s CRA record into account in its evaluation of any application made by any of such institutions.  A financial institution’s failure to comply with the CRA provisions could, at a minimum, result in regulatory restrictions on its activities including:

 

· Approval of a new branch or other deposit facility

 

· Closing of a branch or other deposit facility

 

· An office relocation or a merger

 

· Any acquisition of bank shares

 

The CRA, as amended, also requires that the OCC make publicly available the evaluation of a bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low-and-moderate-income neighborhoods.  This evaluation includes a descriptive rating of either outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, or substantial noncompliance, and a statement describing the basis for the rating.  These ratings are publicly disclosed.

 

Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions

 

Dividends are paid by the Corporation from its earnings, which are mainly provided by dividends from the Bank.  However, certain regulatory restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Corporation in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.  The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the Bank’s net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years.  Under this restriction, at December 31, 2009, the Bank could declare dividends of $609,000 to the Corporation without prior regulatory approval.

 

Capital Adequacy

 

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (‘‘FDICIA’’) institutions are classified in one of five defined categories as illustrated below.

 

Capital Category

 

Total
Risk-Based
Ratio

 

Tier 1
Risk-Based
Ratio

 

Tier 1
Leverage
Ratio

 

Well capitalized

 

>10.0

 

>6.0

 

>5.0

 

Adequately capitalized

 

>8.0

 

>4.0

 

>4.0*

 

Undercapitalized

 

<8.0

 

<4.0

 

<4.0*

 

Significantly undercapitalized

 

<6.0

 

<3.0

 

<3.0

 

Critically undercapitalized

 

 

 

 

 

<2.0

 

 


*                3.0 for those banks having the highest available regulatory rating.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Riverview National Bank’s capital ratios exceed the regulatory requirements to be considered well capitalized for Total Risk-Based Capital, Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital, and Tier 1 Leverage Capital.

 

Prompt Corrective Action

 

In the event an institution’s capital deteriorates to the undercapitalized category or below, FDICIA prescribes an increasing amount of regulatory intervention, including:

 

· Implementation of a capital restoration plan and a guarantee of the plan by a parent institution

 

· Placement of a hold on increases in assets, number of branches, or lines of business

 

If capital reaches the significantly or critically undercapitalized level, further material restrictions can be imposed, including restrictions on interest payable on accounts, dismissal of management and (in critically undercapitalized situations) appointment of a receiver.  For well-capitalized institutions, FDICIA provides authority for regulatory intervention where they deem the institution to be engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, or if the institution receives a less than satisfactory examination report rating for asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, or sensitivity to market risk.

 

Legislation and Regulatory Changes

 

From time to time, legislation is enacted that has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial institutions.  Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial institutions are frequently made in Congress, and before various regulatory agencies.  No prediction can be made as to the likelihood of any major changes or the impact such changes might have on Riverview National Bank’s operations.  Certain changes of potential significance to Riverview National Bank that have been enacted recently and others, which are currently under consideration by Congress or various regulatory or professional agencies, are discussed below.

 

Legislation and Regulations

 

USA Patriot Act

 

The USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 became law on March 9, 2006.  This enactment extended the requirements of the original act signed into law in October 2001 and was renewed in March 2006.  The USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing, and broadened anti-money laundering requirements.  By way of amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act included measures intended to encourage information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies.  Further, certain provisions of Title III imposed affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.

 

The rules, developed by the Secretary of the Treasury, require that banks have procedures in place to:

 

· Verify the identity of persons applying to open an account

 

· Ensure adequate maintenance of the records used to verify a person’s identity, and

 

· Determine whether a person is on any US governmental agency list of known or suspected terrorists or a terrorist organization

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The bank regulatory agencies have increased the regulatory scrutiny of the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering programs maintained by financial institutions.  Significant penalties and fines, as well as other supervisory orders may be imposed on a financial institution for non-compliance with these requirements.  In addition, federal bank regulatory agencies must consider the effectiveness of financial institutions engaging in a merger transaction in combating money laundering activities.  Riverview National Bank has adopted policies and procedures which are in compliance with these requirements

 

Multifactor Authentification

 

The bank regulatory agencies jointly published the ‘‘Interagency Guidance on Authentification in an Internet Banking Environment’’.  This guidance requires banks to implement enhanced security measures to authenticate customers using internet based services to process transactions that either access customer information or transfer funds to third parties.  The principles of this guidance apply to telephone banking systems and call centers if the same level of access is available through these services.

 

Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005

 

The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 was passed by Congress on April 14, 2005 and signed into law by the President on April 20, 2005.

 

This Act amends both the Bankruptcy Code and the Truth in Lending Act.  The Bankruptcy Code revisions became effective October 15, 2005.  The Bankruptcy Code was amended, adding requirements to the process for filing for bankruptcy.  The provisions related to the Truth in Lending did not become effective until October of 2006.  It requires lenders to:

 

· Warn customers about the impact of making only the minimum payment under an open-end consumer credit plan

 

· Provide a toll free number for consumers to call for information regarding the consequences of making only minimum required payments

 

· Inform customers that interest attributed to the portion of a home secured loan that exceeds the property’s fair market value is not tax deductible

 

· Provide new disclosures on solicitations and applications for open-end credit plans containing an introductory rate

 

Ongoing Legislation

 

As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States, Riverview National Bank’s business is particularly susceptible to changes in the federal and state legislation and regulations.  Over the course of time, various federal and state proposals for legislation could result in additional regulatory and legal requirements for Riverview National Bank.  Riverview National Bank can neither predict if any such legislation will be adopted nor if adopted how it would affect the business of Riverview National Bank.  Past history has demonstrated that new legislation or changes to existing legislation usually results in a heavier compliance burden and, therefore, generally increases the cost of doing business.

 

Recent Developments

 

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.  In response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, on October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law and subsequently amended by the American

 

11



Table of Contents

 

Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on February 17, 2009.  Under the authority of the EESA, as amended, the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program and through this program invested in financial institutions by purchasing preferred stock and warrants to purchase either common stock or additional shares of preferred stock.  As of December 31, 2009, the Treasury will not make additional investments under the TARP Capital Purchase Program but is considering continuing a similar program for banks under $10 billion in assets under a different program.

 

Available Information

 

Riverview Financial Corporation is subject to the informational requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and, accordingly, files reports, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The reports and other information filed with the SEC are available for inspection and copying at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, and Washington, D.C. 20549.  You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  Riverview Financial Corporation is an electronic filer with the SEC.  The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.  The SEC’s internet site address is http://www.sec.gov.

 

Riverview Financial Corporation’s headquarters are located at 3rd and Market Streets, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032, and its telephone number is (717) 896-3433.

 

At December 31, 2009, Riverview Financial Corporation had 53 full time employees and 10 part time employees.  In the opinion of management, Riverview Financial Corporation enjoys a satisfactory relationship with its employees.  Riverview Financial Corporation is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

 

None.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

 

Riverview owns a parking lot located at 110 Verbeke Street, Marysville, Pennsylvania 17053, which is adjacent to the main office of Riverview National Bank.  The table below sets forth the locations of the properties that are owned and leased in the name of Riverview National Bank, which include its main office, branch offices and certain parking facilities related to its banking offices.  As for those properties that are owned, all are owned free and clear of any lien.  The Bank’s main office and all branch offices are located in Pennsylvania.

 

Operating under the name “The First National Bank of Marysville, a division of Riverview National Bank”:

 

Office and Address

 

2040 Good Hope Road, Enola, Pennsylvania 17025 (leased)

1288 North Mountain Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112 (leased)

55 South Main Street, Duncannon, Pennsylvania 17020 (leased)

200 Front Street, Marysville, Pennsylvania 17053 (owned)

500 South State Road, Marysville, Pennsylvania 17053 (owned)

 

Operating under the name “Halifax National Bank, a division of Riverview National Bank”:

 

Office and Address

 

Third and Market Streets, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032 (owned)

311 South Market Street, Millersburg, Pennsylvania 17061 (owned)

Drive-through facility on 16 N. 3rd Street, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032 (owned)

15 N. 3rd Street, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032 (owned)

Parking Lot on N. 3rd Street, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032 (owned)

Market Street Main Building (owned)

34 South Market Street, Elizabethville, Pennsylvania 17023 (leased)

 

All of these properties are in good condition and are deemed by management to be adequate for Riverview’s purposes.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

Management is not aware of any litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of Riverview.  There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of Riverview and Riverview National Bank.  In addition, management does not know of any material proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities against Riverview or Riverview National Bank or any of its properties.

 

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

 

13



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

The authorized common stock of Riverview consists of 5,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.50 per share of which 1,750,003 shares were outstanding as of March 18, 2010 and held by approximately 370 holders of record.  The number of shareholders does not reflect the number of individuals or institutional investors holding stock in nominee name through banks, brokerage firms, and others.  Riverview common stock is not listed or traded on any market or exchange but instead is traded in a local over-the-counter market and privately negotiated transactions under the symbol “RIVE”. Therefore, the stock is traded at irregular intervals.

 

Riverview pays dividends on the outstanding shares of common stock on a quarterly basis at the discretion of the Board of Directors which bases its decision on Riverview’s earnings, cash requirements and overall financial position.  The following table presents the per share cash dividends declared by the Board of Directors and paid for the years presented.  Dividend information for the year 2008 reflects the dividends paid by First Perry Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Per Share Cash
Dividends Paid

 

2009

First quarter

 

$

0.100

 

 

Second quarter

 

0.100

 

 

Third quarter

 

0.100

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

0.120

 

 

 

 

$

0.420

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

First quarter

 

$

0.078

 

 

Second quarter

 

0.078

 

 

Third quarter

 

0.078

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

0.078

 

 

 

 

$

0.312

 

 

On March 3, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per common share, payable on March 31, 2010 to all common shareholders of record as of March 17, 2010.

 

Additional information relating to dividend restrictions can be found in Note 14 — Regulatory Matters and Shareholders’ Equity — in Part II, Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - incorporated in this Form 10-K.

 

Information about Riverview’s Equity Compensation Plans can be found in Part II, Item 7 under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

Not Required.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION.

 

SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain of the matters discussed in this document and in documents incorporated by reference herein, including matters discussed below, may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Riverview to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.

 

Riverview’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:

 

·                  anticipated cost savings and synergies from the consolidation may not be realized;

·                  the effects of future economic conditions on Riverview and the Riverview National Bank’s customers;

·                  the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation;

·                  governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes;

·                  the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other accounting standard setters;

·                  the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest rate protection agreements, as well as interest rate risks;

·                  the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in Riverview’s market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating locally, regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet;

·                  technological changes;

·                  acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses;

·                  the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan and lease losses and estimations of values of collateral and various financial assets and liabilities; and

·                  acts of war or terrorism;

·                  volatilities in the securities market; and

·                  deteriorating economic conditions.

 

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to Riverview are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.

 

We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.  They only reflect management’s analysis as of this date.  Riverview does not revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or changed circumstances.  Please carefully review the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents Riverview files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any other Current Reports on Form 8-K.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of Riverview’s consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with

 

15



Table of Contents

 

the Consolidated Financial Statements of Riverview and Notes thereto and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The consolidated financial statements include Riverview and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Riverview National Bank.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

The accounting and reporting policies followed by Riverview conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheets and results of operations for the periods indicated.  Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Riverview’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  The most significant accounting policies followed by Riverview are presented in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements.  Note 1 presents significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of its financial statements.  This discussion and analysis, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for an understanding and evaluation of Riverview and its results of operations.  Riverview has identified several policies as being critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions.  These policies relate to the allowance for loan losses, valuation of its securities and accounting for income taxes.

 

The allowance for loan losses is established through a charge to earnings for the provision for loan losses.  In determining the balance in the allowance for loan losses, consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing the estimate.  In estimating the allowance for loan losses, management considers current economic conditions, diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics and trends in actual and forecasted credit quality, results of internal loan reviews, borrowers’ perceived financial strengths, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, if collateral dependent, or present value of future cash flows and other relevant factors.  The use of different estimates and assumptions could produce different provisions for loan losses.  Additional information is provided in the “Provisions for Loan Losses”, “Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Credit Risk and Loan Quality” sections.

 

Declines in the fair value of securities held to maturity and available-for-sale, below their costs that are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, are reflected in earnings as realized losses.  In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Riverview to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any recovery in fair value.  No securities were deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2009.

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability method.  Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.  To the extent that current available evidence about the future raises doubt about the likelihood of a deferred tax asset being realized, a valuation allowance is established.  The judgment about the level of future taxable income, including that which is considered capital, is inherently subjective and is reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change.  Riverview has deemed that its deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized, and accordingly, has not established a

 

16



Table of Contents

 

valuation allowance for them.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Business Combination

 

On December 31, 2008 and pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Consolidation (the “Agreement”), dated, June 18, 2008, as amended, by and between First Perry Bancorp, Inc. (“First Perry”) and HNB Bancorp, Inc. (“HNB”), Riverview Financial Corporation (“Riverview”), a Pennsylvania Corporation, was formed upon the completion of the consolidation of First Perry and HNB under Pennsylvania law.  Each outstanding share of common stock of First Perry and HNB was converted into 2.435 and 2.520 shares of Riverview’s common stock, respectively.  Further, The First National Bank of Marysville, the wholly owned subsidiary of First Perry, and Halifax National Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of HNB, consolidated to form Riverview National Bank (the “Bank”), which is the wholly owned subsidiary of Riverview.  Riverview issued 1,750,003 shares of common stock and incurred $310,000 in transaction costs.  The primary reason for the combination was to pool resources to provide greater products and services to customers in the contiguous counties, and to provide better efficiencies and cost savings through the consolidation of operations.

 

As a community-focused financial institution, Riverview, through its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, generates the majority of its revenues from net interest income derived from its core banking activities.  During 2009, Riverview continued to experience strong financial performance and achieved solid growth in assets, loans and deposits.  Riverview was able to successfully grow while maintaining its commitment to ensure strong credit quality, retain and expand customer relationships and prudently manage interest rate risk.  In addition, Riverview continues to be focused on business practices that not only provide value to its customers but to its shareholders as well.

 

The combined financial information for the year ended December 31, 2008 reflects the impact of the consolidation of First Perry’s and HNB’s combined financial condition under the purchase method of accounting with First Perry treated as the acquirer from an accounting standpoint.  Under this method of accounting, Riverview was formed and treated as a recapitalization of First Perry, with First Perry’s assets and liabilities recorded at their historical values, and HNB’s at their fair values on the date the consolidation was completed.  In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, the financial information relating to the periods prior to December 31, 2008 of First Perry, the acquirer, is reported under the name of Riverview Financial Corporation.

 

Riverview’s results of operations are primarily derived from the management of spread income generated between the interest received on its interest-earning assets and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities.  Changes in net interest income are not only affected by changes in interest rates, but are also impacted by changes in the make-up of the balance sheet as well as the level of yield generated from interest-earning assets versus the costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities.  Riverview also generates non-interest income from fees associated with various products and services offered to customers, mortgage banking activities, bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) and from the sale of assets, such as loans or investments.   Offsetting these revenues are provisions for potential losses on loans, administrative expenses and income taxes.

 

As of the 2009 year end, Riverview achieved net income of $1,111,000, an increase of 199.5% from net income of $371,000 for the 2008 year end.  Basic earnings per share in 2009 were $0.63 per share, an increase of 61.5% from $0.39 per share in 2008.  The increase is primarily due to the fact that 2009 net income reflects the combined earnings of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and HNB Bancorp, Inc. and their wholly-owned subsidiaries, The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank (the “consolidation”), which were consolidated on December 31, 2008 to form Riverview Financial Corporation, as compared with 2008 net income, which only represents the earnings of First Perry Bancorp, Inc., the holding company of The First National Bank of Marysville.  Further impacting the increase in net income was the growth of assets as a result of the consolidation, and Riverview’s management of its net interest margin during a period in which short-term interest rates remained at historic lows.  Return on average assets was 0.46% in 2009 compared to

 

17



Table of Contents

 

0.29% in 2008.  Return on average equity was 4.45% in 2009 compared to 2.90% in 2008.  The increase in both ratios is attributable to the increase in net income during 2009.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

 

Net interest income is the most significant component of Riverview’s net income as a result of its focus on traditional banking activities.  It is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  The change in net interest income from year to year may be due to changes in interest rates, changes in volumes of interest-earning assets and liabilities as well as changes in the mix of such assets and liabilities.  Riverview’s principal interest-earning assets are loans to individuals and small businesses, with a secondary source of income earned from the investment securities portfolio and other interest-earning deposits with banks.  Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of demand deposit accounts, time deposits, money market accounts, savings deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and borrowings.  Generally, changes in net interest income are portrayed by net interest rate spread and net interest margin.  Net interest rate spread is equal to the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.  Net interest margin is the average yield on interest-earning assets minus the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing deposits.  Net interest income growth is generally dependent upon balance sheet growth and maintaining or growing the net interest margin.  For analysis purposes, net interest income is evaluated on a fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) basis.  The FTE basis is calculated by grossing up the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans by the Federal tax rate of 34% in order that the yield on tax-exempt assets may be comparable to interest earned on taxable assets.

 

2009 Compared to 2008

 

Total interest income increased on a fully tax equivalent basis (as adjusted for the tax benefit derived from tax exempt assets — see Table 1 for calculation), by $5,135,000, or 70.1 %, to $12,457,000 for 2009 from $7,322,000 for 2008.  This increase was due to the consolidation and organic growth, which contributed to the 85.8% increase in average interest-earning assets to $221,605,000 in 2009 from $119,246,000 in 2008.  The growth in average interest-earning assets was attributable to a 43.6 % increase in investment securities, 77.2% increase in loans and a 1651.3% increase in other interest-earning assets, mostly comprised of deposits with banks.  The increased volume offset the decline in yields (calculated on a fully tax-equivalent basis) to 5.62% for 2009 from 6.14% in 2008.  The decline in the yield on earning assets was attributable to changes in market interest rates.

 

Total interest expense increased $1,816,000, or 59.7% to $4,860,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $3,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Cost of funds decreased to 2.48% at the end of 2009 from 2.87% at the end of 2008.  The decline in the cost of funds offset the increase in the volume of average interest-bearing liabilities.  While average interest-bearing liabilities increased due to the consolidation and deposit growth, Riverview paid off $20,796,000 in short-term borrowings and took advantage of declining interest rates by securing more cost effective long-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”).

 

Net interest income calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis increased $3,319,000, or 77.6%, to $7,597,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $4,278,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Riverview’s net interest spread decreased to 3.14% at December 31, 2009 from 3.27% at December 31, 2008, while its net interest margin decreased to 3.43% at December 31, 2009 from 3.58% at December 31, 2008.  In consideration of the increased volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, management proactively managed the cost associated with interest-bearing liabilities and was able to improve its net interest spread and margin even though the yields from interest-earning assets declined.  Riverview’s ability to manage net interest income over a variety of interest rate and economic environments is important to its financial success.  Growth in net interest income is generally dependent upon the growth of the balance sheet and managing the net interest margin.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

2008 Compared to 2007

 

Total interest income increased on a fully tax equivalent basis, by $692,000, or 10.4%, to $7,322,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $6,630,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  This increase was attributable to a shift in the composition of interest-earning assets where the cash flows from investment securities and other interest-earning assets were reinvested in loans which generated a higher yield.

 

Total interest expense decreased $214,000, or 6.6%, to $3,044,000 in 2008 from $3,258,000 in 2007.  The decrease was attributable to a decline in cost of funds, which mitigated the impact of the 13.5% growth in total interest-bearing liabilities, which increased to $106,069,000 at the 2008 year end from $93,452,000 for 2007 as a result of increased borrowings.

 

Net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased by $906,000, or 26.9%, to $4,278,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $3,372,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.  This was attributable to the growth in interest sensitive assets and prime rate decreases, which had the impact of reducing cost of funds.  The net interest spread (on a fully tax equivalent basis) increased to 3.27% for 2008 from 2.80 for 2008, while the net interest margin (on a fully tax equivalent basis) increased to 3.58% for 2008 from 3.20% for 2007.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Table 1 presents a summary of the Bank’s average balances, interest rates, interest income and expense, the interest rate spread and the net interest margin, adjusted to a fully tax-equivalent basis, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

TABLE 1

 

AVERAGE BALANCES, RATES AND INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Balance

 

Interest

 

Yield/Rate

 

Balance

 

Interest

 

Yield/Rate

 

Balance

 

Interest

 

Yield/Rate

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-earning Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable securities (2)

 

$

15,731

 

$

514

 

3.27

%

$

15,917

 

$

596

 

3.74

%

$

17,187

 

$

664

 

3.86

%

Tax-exempt securities (1)(2)

 

11,516

 

686

 

5.96

%

3,061

 

208

 

6.80

%

5,045

 

344

 

6.82

%

Total securities

 

 27,247

 

1,200

 

4.40

%

18,978

 

804

 

4.24

%

22,232

 

1,008

 

4.53

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans (1)(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

4,959

 

281

 

5.67

%

3,622

 

276

 

7.62

%

4,440

 

348

 

7.84

%

Commercial

 

11,647

 

749

 

6.43

%

9,030

 

626

 

6.93

%

7,086

 

560

 

7.90

%

Real estate

 

159,136

 

10,065

 

6.32

%

86,553

 

5,585

 

6.45

%

 68,703

 

4,575

 

6.66

%

Total loans

 

175,742

 

11,095

 

6.31

%

99,205

 

6,487

 

6.54

%

80,229

 

5,483

 

6.83

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-earning assets

 

18,616

 

162

 

0.87

%

1,063

 

31

 

2.92

%

3,015

 

139

 

4.61

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest-earning assets

 

221,605

 

12,457

 

5.62

%

119,246

 

7,322

 

6.14

%

105,476

 

6,630

 

6.29

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest earning assets

 

21,217

 

 

 

 

 

10,007

 

 

 

 

 

 9,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

242,822

 

 

 

 

 

$

129,253

 

 

 

 

 

$

114,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

$

40,337

 

$

602

 

1.49

%

$

17,020

 

$

216

 

1.27

%

$

16,759

 

$

436

 

2.60

%

Savings deposits

 

28,709

 

302

 

1.05

%

15,067

 

137

 

0.91

%

15,617

 

203

 

1.30

%

Time deposits

 

108,321

 

3,569

 

3.29

%

51,059

 

1,942

 

3.80

%

50,989

 

2,103

 

4.12

%

Total deposits

 

177,367

 

4,473

 

2.52

%

83,146

 

2,295

 

2.76

%

83,365

 

2,742

 

3.29

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

8,111

 

49

 

0.60

%

9,743

 

152

 

1.56

%

3,579

 

190

 

5.31

%

Long-term borrowings

 

10,391

 

338

 

3.25

%

13,180

 

597

 

4.53

%

6,508

 

326

 

5.01

%

Total borrowings

 

18,502

 

387

 

2.09

%

22,923

 

749

 

3.27

%

 10,087

 

516

 

5.12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

195,869

 

4,860

 

2.48

%

106,069

 

3,044

 

2.87

%

93,452

 

3,258

 

3.49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demand deposits

 

20,338

 

 

 

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

 

 

8,279

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

1,652

 

 

 

 

 

692

 

 

 

 

 

857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 24,963

 

 

 

 

 

12,808

 

 

 

 

 

12,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

$

242,822

 

 

 

 

 

$

129,253

 

 

 

 

 

$

114,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Income

 

 

 

$

7,597

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,278

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,372

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Spread

 

 

 

 

 

3.14

%

 

 

 

 

3.27

%

 

 

 

 

2.80

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Margin

 

 

 

 

 

3.43

%

 

 

 

 

3.58

%

 

 

 

 

3.20

%

 


(1)   Yields on tax-exempt assets have been calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.

 

(2)   Available-for-sale securities are reported at amortized cost for purposes of calculating yields.

 

(3)   For yield calculation purposes, non-accruing loans are included in the average loan balances, and any income recognized on these loans is included in interest income.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Table 2 presents a summary of changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volumes (average balances) and changes in rates for the periods indicated.

 

TABLE 2

 

RATE VOLUME ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME

 

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

 

 

 

2009 vs. 2008

 

2008 vs. 2007

 

 

 

Increase/(Decrease)

 

Increase/(Decrease)

 

(In thousands)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

Total

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-Earning Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing due from banks and federal funds sold

 

$

151

 

$

(20

)

$

131

 

$

(53

)

$

(55

)

$

(108

)

Securities, taxable (1)

 

(7

)

(75

)

(82

)

(47

)

(21

)

(68

)

Securities, tax-exempt (1)

 

503

 

(25

)

478

 

(134

)

(2

)

(136

)

Loans (1)

 

4,836

 

(228

)

4,608

 

1,237

 

(233

)

1,004

 

Net Change in Interest Income

 

5,483

 

(348

)

5,135

 

1,003

 

(311

)

692

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

349

 

37

 

386

 

3

 

(223

)

(220

)

Savings deposits

 

144

 

21

 

165

 

(5

)

(61

)

(66

)

Time deposits

 

1,887

 

(260

)

1,627

 

2

 

(163

)

(161

)

Borrowings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

(8

)

(95

)

(103

)

97

 

(135

)

(38

)

Long-term borrowings

 

(90

)

(169

)

(259

)

302

 

(31

)

271

 

Net Change in Interest Expense

 

2,282

 

(466

)

1,816

 

399

 

(613

)

(214

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHANGE IN NET INTEREST INCOME

 

$

3,201

 

$

118

 

$

3,319

 

$

604

 

$

302

 

$

906

 

 


(1)                                  Yields on tax-exempt assets have been computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.

 

Provision for Loan Losses

 

Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level management considers adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  Credit exposures deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses.  Recoveries of previously charged-off loans are credited to the allowance for loan losses.  The Bank performs periodic evaluations of the allowance for loan losses with consideration given to historical, internal and external factors.  In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, delinquency trends and charge-off activity, status of past due and non-performing loans, growth within the portfolio, the amount and types of loans comprising the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to pay, the estimated value of underlying collateral, peer group information and prevailing economic conditions.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are caused to undergo interpretation and possible revision as events occur or as more information becomes available.  Loans are also reviewed for impairment based on discounted cash flows using the loans’ initial effective interest rates or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans as provided under the accounting standard relating to Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.  After an evaluation of these factors, the provision recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1,125,000 as compared with $380,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008.   A higher provision was made to the allowance for loan losses in 2009 due to an increase in criticized loans, and particularly, the adverse classification of two large commercial loans deemed to be impaired which required specific reserves.  The allowance for loan losses was $2,560,000 or 1.48% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2009 as compared to $1,710,000, or 0.96% of total loans at December 31, 2008.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Management assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes provisions for loan losses, if necessary, in order to maintain the adequacy of the allowance.  Management believes the reserve for loan losses at December 31, 2009 is maintained at a level that is currently adequate to absorb probable and potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  At the same time, management continues to allocate dedicated resources to continue to manage at-risk credits.

 

Non-Interest Income

 

Non-interest income continues to represent a considerable source of income for Riverview, representing 18.3% of the total revenues (comprised of net interest income and non-interest income) in 2009 and 12.1% in 2008.  Non-interest income consists primarily of customer service fees and charges derived from deposit accounts, mortgage banking activities, the investment in bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) and gains from the sale of loans and available-for-sale securities.

 

The increases in service charges on deposit accounts and other fee income for 2009 were generally attributable to the consolidation as well as increased core deposit activity.  Earnings from the cash value of life insurance increased in 2009 as compared with 2008 as a result of the consolidation as well as a gain of $26,000 from the proceeds of bank owned life insurance paid as a result of the death of a former director.  Also contributing to the increase in the 2009 non-interest income were gains from the sale of available-for-sale securities, which were $247,000 higher than the gains on sale recorded in 2008.  During 2009 the Bank recorded $443,000 in income, as compared with $50,000 recorded in 2008, that was generated from the sale of mortgage loans sold servicing released to Freddie Mac and to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) under its Mortgage Partnership Finance program (“MPF”).  The reason why this income is so much lower for 2008 is because the Bank did not partake in the sale of mortgage loans until the latter part of 2008 and due to a lower interest rate environment.

 

The following table presents the components of non-interest income and related fluctuations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Non-Interest Income

 

2009

 

Increase
(Decrease)

Amount

 

%

 

2008

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

$

288

 

$

132

 

84.6

%

$

156

 

Other service charges and fees

 

358

 

138

 

62.7

%

220

 

Earnings on cash value of life insurance

 

262

 

162

 

162.0

%

100

 

Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

 

287

 

247

 

617.5

%

40

 

Gain from sale of held for sale mortgage loans

 

443

 

393

 

786.0

%

50

 

 

 

$

1,638

 

$

1,072

 

189.4

%

$

566

 

 

Non-Interest Expenses

 

The increase of $2,556,000 or 64.2% in non-interest expenses is primarily attributable to the consolidation, increased professional fees relating to the consolidation and costs associated with the merger of systems and processes to expedite the union of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and HNB Bancorp, Inc. and their wholly-owned subsidiaries, The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank.

 

During the second quarter of 2009, the Bank updated its standard costs relating to the origination of all types of loans.  Generally accepted accounting principles relating to Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating of Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases establish the accounting treatment for fees and initial direct costs associated with the origination of a loan, where direct loan costs may be deferred and capitalized.  These costs will be expensed over the life of the related loan as a reduction of the loan yield.  Direct loan costs capitalized during 2009 increased $330,000 over 2008 as a

 

22



Table of Contents

 

result of the updated cost structure, the consolidation of the loan portfolios of the two merged banks, and the volume loan originations.  In recording the deferral of these direct loan costs, it had the immediate impact of reducing salary expense by $376,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared with $46,000 recorded in 2008.

 

With regard to the FDIC premium, on November 12, 2009, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rulemaking requiring insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012.  The FDIC also voted to adopt a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011.  Each institution recorded the entire amount of its prepaid assessment as a prepaid expense (asset) as of December 31, 2009.  As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, each institution will record an expense (charge to earnings) for its regular quarterly assessment for the quarter and an offsetting credit to the prepaid assessment until the asset is exhausted.  Once the asset is exhausted, the institution will record an accrued expense payable each quarter for the assessment payment, which will be paid in arrears to the FDIC at the end of the following quarter.  If the prepaid assessment is not exhausted by December 31, 2014, any remaining amount will be returned to the depository institution.  This expense for 2009  is higher than that of 2008 because of the expense incurred to record the special FDIC assessment that was required to be accrued during the second quarter but paid at the end of the third quarter of 2009.  All FDIC insured financial institutions were required to pay this special assessment.  In addition, there was a higher expense associated with the “regular” FDIC assessment as compared with the 2008 assessment, at which time the Bank received a one-time credit.

 

The following table presents the components of non-interest expenses and the related changes for the years ended 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Non-Interest Expenses

 

2009

 

Increase
(Decrease)
Amount

 

%

 

2008

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

$

3,048

 

$

843

 

38.2

%

$

2,205

 

Occupancy expense

 

675

 

226

 

50.3

%

449

 

Equipment expense

 

425

 

212

 

99.5

%

213

 

Telecommunications and processing charges

 

480

 

237

 

97.5

%

243

 

Postage and office supplies

 

225

 

131

 

139.4

%

94

 

FDIC premium

 

433

 

388

 

862.2

%

45

 

Bank shares tax expense

 

257

 

153

 

147.1

%

104

 

Directors’ compensation

 

219

 

114

 

108.6

%

105

 

Professional services

 

266

 

79

 

42.3

%

187

 

Other expenses

 

511

 

173

 

51.2

%

338

 

Total non-interest expenses

 

$

6,539

 

$

2,556

 

64.2

%

$

3,983

 

 

Income Taxes

 

The provision for federal income tax expense (benefit) was $153,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to ($42,000) for the year ended December 31, 2008.  The tax provision increased $195,000, or 464.3%, as a result of the increased level of net income achieved in 2009.  The tax provision reflects an effective tax rate of approximately a 12.1% expense for 2009 and a 13.0% benefit for 2008.  The effective tax rate continues to be less than the statutory Federal tax rate of 34%.  The difference between the statutory and effective tax rates reflects the tax-exempt status of interest income on loans and obligations of state and political subdivisions and the impact of the earnings from the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Securities

 

Riverview’s securities portfolio is comprised of securities, which not only provide interest income, including tax-exempt income, but also provide a source of liquidity, diversify the earning assets portfolio, allow for the management of risk and tax liability, and provide collateral for repurchase agreements and public fund deposits.  Policies are in place to address various aspects of managing the portfolio, including but not limited to, concentrations, liquidity, credit quality, interest rate sensitivity and regulatory guidelines.  Adherence to these policies is monitored by Riverview’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) on a quarterly basis.

 

Because of the changing nature of the banking environment and the need to correspondingly position assets, all investment securities are characterized as available-for-sale and carried at fair value with net unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as a separate component of comprehensive income.

 

Table 3 illustrates the composition of the securities portfolio for the periods presented.

 

TABLE 3

 

SECURITIES

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

2,375

 

$

7,264

 

$

4,092

 

State and municipal

 

14,950

 

9,373

 

4,480

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

17,258

 

11,181

 

11,718

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

302

 

 

 

 

$

34,583

 

$

28,120

 

$

20,290

 

 

During 2009 U.S. Government agencies declined as a result of investment maturities, prepayments and calls.  The balance of state and municipal bonds increased during 2009 due to the Bank’s need to generate more tax-exempt income to complement the increase in its net income.  In addition, mortgage-backed securities increased during 2009.  During the third quarter of 2009, management decided to sell most of its mortgage-backed securities that were issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”).  The reason for doing this was to alleviate some of the credit risk associated with these particular U.S. Government agencies in light of the fact that they do not carry a full-faith credit guaranty by the government.  The proceeds of the sale of these securities plus additional funds that were on deposit with banks were reinvested in mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), which is a government owned corporation and carries the full-faith credit guarantee of the United States federal government.

 

Included in the carrying values of investment securities at December 31, 2009 is a net unrealized gain of $245,000, compared to a net unrealized gain of $56,000 at December 31, 2008.  At December 31, 2009, the unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax, included in shareholders’ equity totaled $161,000, compared to $37,000 at December 31, 2008.  The net increase in the carrying value of securities is reflective of declines in the interest rate environment and a shorter duration of the portfolio which will cause the securities to trade closer to par.

 

No securities are considered other-than-temporarily-impaired based on management’s evaluation of the individual securities, including the extent and length of the unrealized loss, Riverview’s ability to hold the

 

24



Table of Contents

 

security until maturity or until the fair value recovers, and management’s opinion that it will not have to sell the securities prior to recovery of value.  Riverview invests in securities for the cash flow and yields they produce and not to profit from trading.  Riverview holds no trading securities in its portfolio, and the portfolio does not contain high risk securities or derivatives as of December 31, 2009.

 

Investment in stock of the FHLB is required for membership in the organization and is carried at cost since there is no market value available.  The amount that Riverview is required to invest is based upon a formula which weighs a dependence upon the relative size of outstanding borrowings that it has with the FHLB.  Excess stock was typically repurchased at par by the FHLB from Riverview if borrowings declined to a predetermined level.  Throughout most of 2008, Riverview earned a return or dividend based upon the amount invested.  In late December 2008, the FHLB announced that it had suspended the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock to preserve its capital level.  That decision was based on FHLB’s analysis and consideration of certain negative market trends and the impact those trends had on its financial condition.  The FHLB has not violated its agreement with its member banks by not repurchasing excess capital stock in that it is not generally required to redeem membership stock until five years after the membership has terminated.  Based on the financial results of the FHLB for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, management believes that the suspension of both the dividend payment and excess capital stock repurchase is temporary in nature.  Management further believes that the FHLB will continue to be a primary source of wholesale liquidity for both short- and long-term funding and has concluded that its investment in FHLB stock is not other-than-temporarily impaired.  Riverview will continue to monitor the financial condition of the FHLB quarterly to assess its ability to resume these activities in the future.

 

Table 4 presents the maturities and average weighted yields of the securities portfolio at fair value as of December 31, 2009.  Yields are based on amortized cost.

 

TABLE 4

MATURITIES AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE YIELDS OF SECURITIES

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

1 Year or Less

 

1 to 5 Years

 

5 to 10 Years

 

Over 10 Years or
No Maturity

 

Total

 

Due In:

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

512

 

1.32

%

$

1,357

 

2.84

%

$

506

 

4.35

%

$

 

 

$

2,375

 

2.84

%

State and municipal

 

 

 

1,391

 

5.47

%

4,809

 

5.71

%

8,750

 

5.80

%

14,950

 

5.74

%

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

2,736

 

2.69

%

14,522

 

3.63

%

17,258

 

3.48

%

 

 

$

512

 

1.32

%

$

2,748

 

4.17

%

$

8,051

 

4.60

%

$

23,272

 

4.45

%

$

34,583

 

4.42

%

 

All securities are available-for-sale and are accounted for at fair value.

 

Weighted average yields are calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.

 

Loans

 

The loan portfolio comprises the major component of Riverview’s earning assets and is the highest yielding asset category.  At December 31, 2009, total loans receivable (net of the allowance for loan losses, unearned fees and origination costs) amounted to $170,384,000, a decrease of $6,085,000, or 3.4%, as compared with $176,469,000 as of December 31, 2008.  Loans receivable, net of the allowance for loan losses, represent 67.4% of total assets and 79.3% of total deposits as of December 31, 2009, as compared to 76.1% and 101.2%, respectively, at December 31, 2008.  All of Riverview’s loans are to domestic borrowers.

 

25


 


Table of Contents

 

Table 5 presents the composition of the total loan portfolio for the periods presented:

 

TABLE 5

 

TOTAL LOANS OUTSTANDING

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2009

 

Total

 

2008

 

Total

 

2007

 

Total

 

2006

 

Total

 

2005

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial, financial, agricultural

 

$

13,614

 

7.9

%

$

12,967

 

7.3

%

$

8,845

 

10.5

%

$

   5,722

 

7.4

%

$

6,822

 

9.9

%

Real Estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

17,372

 

10.1

%

18,173

 

10.2

%

9,059

 

10.8

%

3,936

 

5.1

%

1,411

 

2.0

%

Mortgage

 

92,206

 

53.3

%

94,322

 

52.8

%

47,324

 

56.3

%

47,082

 

60.6

%

43,741

 

63.2

%

Commercial

 

46,728

 

27.0

%

48,773

 

27.3

%

15,352

 

18.2

%

16,061

 

20.7

%

12,213

 

17.7

%

Consumer installment

 

2,988

 

1.7

%

4,210

 

2.4

%

3,558

 

4.2

%

4,795

 

6.2

%

4,983

 

7.2

%

Total loans

 

172,908

 

100.0

%

178,445

 

100.0

%

84,138

 

100.0

%

77,596

 

100.0

%

69,170

 

100.0

%

Deferred loan fees

 

36

 

 

 

(266

)

 

 

(234

)

 

 

(248

)

 

 

(236

)

 

 

Total loans, net of fees

 

172,944

 

 

 

178,179

 

 

 

83,904

 

 

 

77,348

 

 

 

68,934

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

(2,560

)

 

 

(1,710

)

 

 

(970

)

 

 

(867

)

 

 

(591

)

 

 

Total loans, net

 

$

170,384

 

 

 

$

176,469

 

 

 

$

82,934

 

 

 

$

76,481

 

 

 

$

68,343

 

 

 

 

The decline in loans is attributable to an increase in the sale of loan participations.  In addition, less mortgage loans were recorded in the portfolio during 2009 since the Bank sold a greater number of mortgage loans servicing released to Freddie Mac and to the FHLB under its MPF program.  The benefit of selling mortgage loans versus keeping them in the portfolio resulted in generating fee income while eliminating the interest rate risk associated with those loans.  Going forward, the Bank will continue to evaluate its options regarding residential mortgage loans in consideration of its relationship with its customers, the interest rate environment and overall economic conditions.  In general, management projects continued growth in the loan portfolio as additional staff has been hired, and as the economy improves and opportunities are identified in Riverview’s market area.

 

Riverview manages risk associated with its loan portfolio by maintaining diversification within the portfolio, consistently applying prudent underwriting standards, ongoing monitoring efforts with attention to portfolio dynamics and mix, and procedures that are consistently applied and updated on an annual basis.  Riverview conducts a semi-annual independent review of the loan portfolio to provide continual assessment of asset quality through an evaluation of the established underwriting criteria used in originating credits.  Separately, every loan booked and loan turndown undergoes an internal audit review for conformity with established policies and a review for compliance with current regulatory lending laws.  Riverview has not lessened its loan underwriting criteria during this time, and management believes its standards continue to remain conservative.

 

Other than as described herein, management does not believe there are any trends, events, or uncertainties that are reasonably expected to have a materially adverse impact on future results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Table 6 summarizes the loan maturities and interest sensitivity for a segment of the loan portfolio.

 

TABLE 6

LOAN MATURITIES AND SENSITIVITY TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES

 

COMMERCIAL AND CONSTRUCTION LOANS

 

December 31, 2009

 

(In thousands)

 

Due Within
1 Year

 

Due 1 - 5
Years

 

Due Over 5
Years

 

Total

 

Commercial, financial, agricultural

 

$

5,576

 

$

5,488

 

$

2,550

 

$

13,614

 

Real estate, construction

 

10,451

 

6,319

 

602

 

17,372

 

Total

 

$

16,027

 

$

11,807

 

$

3,152

 

$

30,986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By interest rate structure:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

$

4,169

 

$

6,791

 

$

3,151

 

$

14,111

 

Variable rate

 

11,858

 

5,016

 

1

 

16,875

 

Total

 

$

16,027

 

$

11,807

 

$

3,152

 

$

30,986

 

 

Credit Risk and Loan Quality

 

Riverview strives to proactively monitor credit risk and exposure to ensure and protect the high quality of its loan portfolio.  Credit policy requires that underwriting, loan documentation and credit analysis standards be met prior to the approval and funding of any loan.  These practices have contributed to the strength and credit quality of the Riverview’s loan portfolio and have protected the portfolio during economic periods of uncertainty.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

Table 7 presents information about Riverview’s nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets for the periods presented.

 

TABLE 7

 

RISK ELEMENTS AND ASSET QUALITY RATIO

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-accruing loans

 

$

3,123

 

$

128

 

$

210

 

$

765

 

$

25

 

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

 

219

 

152

 

932

 

515

 

68

 

Total nonperforming loans

 

3,342

 

280

 

1,142

 

1,280

 

93

 

Foreclosed real estate

 

312

 

144

 

327

 

 

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

$

3,654

 

$

424

 

$

1,469

 

$

1,280

 

$

93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-accrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income that would have been recorded on non-accruing loans

 

$

193

 

$

10

 

$

64

 

$

55

 

$

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income for above loans included in net income for the period

 

$

89

 

$

8

 

$

51

 

$

34

 

$

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming loans to total loans

 

1.93

%

0.16

%

1.38

%

1.67

%

0.14

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

 

1.44

%

0.18

%

1.20

%

1.12

%

0.09

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

 

76.60

%

610.71

%

84.94

%

67.73

%

635.48

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments to lend additional funds to nonperforming loan customers

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

 

Total nonperforming loans (comprised of non-accruing loans and loans past due for more than 90 days) as of December 31, 2009, increased $3,062,000, to $3,342,000 as compared to $280,000 as of December 31, 2008.  The increase in nonperforming loans at the 2009 year end as compared with the 2008 year end is largely attributable to two particular commercial loans, whose businesses were negatively affected by the downturn in the economy and were place in a non-accrual status.  At December 31, 2009, the loans to these two borrowers were deemed impaired, evaluated in accordance with the accounting standard relating to Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan and appropriate additions to the loan loss reserve were made.  Management continues to be vigilant in its efforts to minimize, identify and evaluate credit risk and potential losses.  Management is proactive in addressing and managing risk appropriate to the increasing level of loan volume and delinquencies in the loan portfolio through its implementation of an enhanced credit administration process - including a more structured loan collection process and close monitoring of compliance with underwriting and loan to value guidelines.

 

Riverview had $312,000 in foreclosed real estate acquired through foreclosure as of December 31, 2009 as compared with $144,000 as of December 31, 2008.  Foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value.

 

Potential problem loans are loans not disclosed as non-performing or troubled debt restructurings but where there is known information about possible credit problems of borrowers that cause serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with loan repayment terms.  As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 there were no such potential problem loans.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

As a result of worsening local and national economic conditions and the softness in real estate in the market served by Riverview, management continues to be attentive to potential deterioration in credit quality due to economic pressures.  Riverview’s residential loan portfolio is centered in properties at price points which have held up well locally as evidenced by appraisals.  Loan-to-value ratios in this portfolio continue to provide adequate collateral support and management does not anticipate any material decline in Riverview’s ability to collect on these loans.  Although management is proactive in identifying and dealing with credit issues that it can control, it anticipates that going forward, additional provisions to its loan loss allowance may be warranted as a result of those economic factors it cannot control.

 

A loan concentration is considered to exist when the total amount of loans to any one or multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities or have similar economic characteristics, exceed 10% of loans outstanding in any one category.  The following table presents loan concentrations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31,
2009

 

December 31,
2008

 

Loans to Lessors of:

 

 

 

 

 

Residential buildings and dwellings

 

$

31,934

 

$

18,068

 

Nonresidential buildings

 

19,321

 

13,344

 

 

Although such loans were not made to any one particular borrower or industry, it is important to note that the quality of these loans could be affected by the region’s economy and overall real estate market.  Management has stress tested this portfolio by applying a 24% vacancy factor to the properties securing these loans and determined that the loans can still generally perform as agreed.

 

It is noted that the actual vacancy factors in Riverview’s market area in each class of non-residential space increased 1% to 4% during 2009, ending the year with total vacancies ranging from 6% to 12%.  Riverview’s non-residential market has not suffered the serious deterioration evident in certain other areas of the country.  Management does not believe that this concentration is an adverse trend to Riverview at this time.

 

Riverview’s lending policy is executed through the assignment of tiered loan limit authorities to individual officers of Riverview and the Board of Directors.  Although Riverview maintains sound credit policies, certain loans may deteriorate for a variety of reasons.  Riverview’s policy is to place all loans in a non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days delinquent in their payments, unless there is a documented, reasonable expectation of the collection of the delinquent amount.  Loans are reviewed bi-monthly as to their status.  Management is not aware of any material potential loan problems that have not been disclosed in this report.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established in the form of a provision expense for loan losses and is reduced by loan charge-offs net of recoveries.  When loans are deemed to be uncollectible, they are charged off.  Management has established a reserve that it believes is adequate for estimated losses in the loan portfolio. In conjunction with an external loan review function that operates independent of the lending function, management monitors the loan portfolio to identify risks on a timely basis so that an appropriate allowance is maintained.  Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a quarterly review of the allowance for loan losses to Riverview’s audit committee detailing significant events that have occurred since the last review.

 

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions.  This evaluation is inherently

 

29



Table of Contents

 

subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

 

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components.  The specific component relates to loans that are classified as substandard or doubtful and deemed to be impaired.  For such loans an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.  The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.  An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.  The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

 

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that Riverview will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

 

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.  Accordingly, Riverview does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless the loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

The following Table 8 sets forth information as to the analysis of the allowance for loan losses and the allocation of the loan losses as of the dates indicated:

 

TABLE 8

 

ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance, beginning of year

 

$

1,710

 

$

970

 

$

867

 

$

591

 

$

466

 

Provision for loan losses

 

1,125

 

380

 

120

 

295

 

150

 

Allowance acquired from HNB

 

 

496

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans charged off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial, financial, agricultural

 

217

 

32

 

 

 

 

Real estate mortgage

 

59

 

125

 

14

 

 

 

Installment

 

 

2

 

15

 

26

 

26

 

Total charged-off

 

276

 

159

 

29

 

26

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan recoveries:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate mortgage

 

 

23

 

4

 

2

 

 

Installment

 

1

 

 

8

 

5

 

1

 

Total recoveries

 

1

 

23

 

12

 

7

 

1

 

Net loans charged off

 

275

 

136

 

17

 

19

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance, end of year

 

$

2,560

 

$

1,710

 

$

970

 

$

867

 

$

591

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net charge-offs to average loans

 

0.16

%

0.14

%

0.02

%

0.03

%

0.04

%

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

 

1.48

%

0.96

%

1.16

%

1.12

%

0.86

%

 

In consideration of the risks and trends associated with the loan portfolio and the increase in non-performing loans, management allocated a $1,125,000 provision to the allowance for loan losses during 2009, which resulted in a total allowance of $2,560,000 as of December 31, 2009 as compared with $1,710,000 as of December 31, 2008.  Management continues to assess the effects of potential declines in the local economy and the local real estate values when determining specific allocations related to impaired loans.

 

The following Table 9 details the allocation of the allowance for loan losses to the various loan categories at December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.  The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the loan categories in which future credit losses may occur.  The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of loans.

 

TABLE 9

 

ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

% Gross

 

 

 

% Gross

 

 

 

% Gross

 

 

 

% Gross

 

 

 

% Gross

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Loans

 

Amount

 

Loans

 

Amount

 

Loans

 

Amount

 

Loans

 

Amount

 

Loans

 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

 

$

819

 

7.9

%

$

124

 

7.3

%

$

165

 

10.5

%

$

114

 

7.4

%

$

139

 

9.9

%

Real estate loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

18

 

10.1

%

77

 

10.2

%

47

 

10.8

%

50

 

5.0

%

2

 

2.0

%

Mortgage

 

356

 

53.3

%

403

 

52.8

%

419

 

56.2

%

427

 

60.7

%

82

 

63.2

%

Commercial

 

1,293

 

27.0

%

928

 

27.3

%

216

 

18.3

%

226

 

20.7

%

359

 

17.7

%

Consumer loans

 

74

 

1.7

%

116

 

2.4

%

43

 

4.2

%

36

 

6.2

%

9

 

7.2

%

Unallocated

 

 

n/a

 

62

 

n/a

 

80

 

n/a

 

14

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

2,560

 

100.0

%

$

1,710

 

100.0

%

$

970

 

100.0

%

$

867

 

100.0

%

$

591

 

100.0

%

 

31


 


Table of Contents

 

A significantly greater percentage of the allowance for loan losses shifted towards the commercial, financial, and agricultural loans segment at December 31, 2009 versus December 31, 2008.  This primarily reflects one commercial borrower whose business was negatively affected by the downturn in the economy.  This loan was deemed impaired and a specific allocation to the allowance for loan losses was made.  The remaining increase in the allocation for this segment of loans is consistent with the growth in this portfolio combined with weakened economic factors and the inherently higher level of credit risk associated with commercial borrowings in general.  The percentage of the allowance allocated to commercial real estate loans increased at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.  The overall quality of commercial real estate portfolio has remained consistent and the size of the portfolio was reduced by $2,045,000 since the 2008 year end.  However, the increase in the dollar amount of reserves in this segment relates to one land development loan which, due to market conditions, was deemed impaired and required a specific allocation to the allowance for loan losses.

 

Management currently believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009 is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary, and the results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations.  In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that material increases will not be necessary should the quality of the loans deteriorate as a result of factors discussed above.

 

Deposits

 

Riverview generates and services deposits through the Bank’s traditional branch banking delivery system.  Deposits are Riverview’s major source of funds available for lending and other investment purposes.  Total deposits at December 31, 2009, were $214,936,000, an increase of $40,583,000, or 23.3%, over total deposits of $174,353,000 as of December 31, 2008.  This increase was due to the consolidation and attributable to organic growth particularly in the interest-bearing demand deposit category, which experienced growth of 170.8 % at December 31, 2009 since the 2008 year end.  This increase is attributable to customer demand for the Bank’s Hometown Checking demand deposit product.

 

Table 10 sets forth the average balance of the Bank’s deposits and the average rates paid on those deposits for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.  All deposits are domestic deposits.

 

TABLE 10

 

AVERAGE DEPOSITS BY MAJOR CLASSIFICATION

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average
Balance

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
Balance

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
Balance

 

Average
Rate

 

Non-interest bearing demand

 

$

20,338

 

0.00

%

$

 9,684

 

0.00

%

$

8,279

 

0.00

%

Interest-bearing demand

 

40,337

 

1.49

%

17,020

 

1.27

%

16,759

 

2.60

%

Savings

 

28,709

 

1.05

%

15,067

 

0.91

%

15,617

 

1.30

%

Time

 

108,321

 

3.29

%

51,059

 

3.80

%

50,989

 

4.12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total deposits

 

$

197,705

 

 

 

$

92,830

 

 

 

$

91,644

 

 

 

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Table 11 displays the remaining maturities and amounts of time certificates issued in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2009.

 

TABLE 11

 

DEPOSIT MATURITIES

 

(In thousands)

 

Time
Certificates

 

 

 

 

 

Three months or less

 

$

5,380

 

Over three months but within six months

 

5,785

 

Over six months but within twelve months

 

7,040

 

Over twelve months

 

11,926

 

Total

 

$

30,131

 

 

Borrowings
 

Short-term borrowings are generally used to meet temporary funding needs and consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and overnight and short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh.  Short-term borrowings decreased $20,516,000 to $807,000 at December 31, 2009 as compared with $21,323,000 as of December 31, 2008.  Management’s decision to utilize the proceeds from the growth in deposits during 2009 to pay off all of the short-term borrowings that were outstanding with the FHLB was initiated for the purpose of lowering the Bank’s cost of funds

 

Long-term borrowings are generally utilized as a resource to fund growth.  Riverview also considers the use of long-term borrowings as a means of managing its cost of funds.  Long-term borrowings are also utilized as a tool to control interest rate positions within the overall asset-liability management function.  All borrowings of this nature have been provided through the FHLB.  Long-term borrowings as of December 31, 2009 increased $664,000 from the prior year end to $10,697,000 as compared to $10,033,000 as of December 31, 2008.

 

Additional information relating borrowings can be found in Note 11 — Borrowings — in Part II, Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — incorporated in this Form 10-K.

 

Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Requirements/Ratios

 

The net result of activity that affected shareholders’ equity during the year resulted in an increase of $512,000 in total shareholders’ equity to $24,717,000, at December 31, 2009, from $24,205,000, at December 31, 2008.  A summary of the transactions include:

 

·                  Net income of $1,111,000 generated in 2009;

 

·                  An increase of $124,000 in the change of accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale;

 

·                  The payment of quarterly cash dividends to shareholders totaling $736,000 in 2009 reduced shareholders’ equity.

 

·                  The recording of $13,000 in compensation cost associated with the granting of options.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Riverview places significant emphasis on maintaining strong capital levels.  The goals for capital planning are to build a strong capital base to fund future growth, to support risks inherent in the banking industry, to retain earnings to meet regulatory requirements and to provide an adequate return to shareholders.

 

Riverview meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Federal Reserve Board’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement.  Accordingly, Riverview is exempt from regulatory requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  However, the Bank is subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board.  Current capital guidelines issued by federal regulatory authorities require the Bank to meet minimum risk-based capital ratios in an effort to make regulatory capital more responsive to possible risk exposure related to a corporation’s on and off-balance sheet items.

 

Risk-based capital provides the basis for which all companies are evaluated in terms of capital adequacy.  Risk-based capital guidelines redefine the components of capital and establish a risk-adjusted ratio relating capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet items.  The components of risk-based capital are segregated as Tier I and Tier II capital.  Tier I capital is composed of total stockholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and other intangible assets.  Tier II capital is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and any qualifying debt obligations.  The minimum risk-based capital standards require all banks to have Tier I capital of at least 4% and total capital (which includes Tier I capital) of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets.

 

The Bank is also subject to leverage capital requirements.  This requirement compares capital (using the definition of Tier I capital) to quarterly average balance sheet assets and is intended to supplement the risk-based capital ratio in measuring capital adequacy.  The guidelines set a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for institutions that are highly rated in terms of safety and soundness, and which are not experiencing or anticipating any significant growth.  Other institutions are expected to maintain capital levels of at least 1% or 2% above that minimum.  As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had a Tier I leverage ratio of 9.0%.

 

Table 13 provides a comparison of the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios at December 31, 2009 and 2008, including the consolidation of The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank at December 31, 2008:

 

TABLE 13

CAPITAL RATIOS

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital

 

$

22,532

 

$

21,732

 

Tier II, allowable portion of:      

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

1,981

 

1,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital

 

$

24,513

 

$

23,442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier I risk-based capital ratio

 

14.3

%

14.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital ratio

 

15.5

%

13.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier I leverage ratio

 

9.0

%

9.5

%

 

Note:      Unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale and goodwill and intangible assets are excluded from regulatory capital components of risk-based capital and leverage ratios.

 

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank exceeded the minimum regulatory capital requirements and was considered to be “well capitalized” under applicable federal regulations.  Additional information

 

34



Table of Contents

 

relating to regulatory capital ratios can be found in Note 14 — Regulatory Matters and Shareholders’ Equity — in Part II, Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data incorporated in this Form 10-K.

 

The maintenance of a solid capital foundation continues to be a primary goal for Riverview.   An objective of the capital planning process is to balance effectively the retention of capital to support future growth, while at the same time, providing shareholders with an attractive long-term return on their investment.  Management believes that Riverview’s capital position is adequate to support current operations and growth, and anticipates earnings to grow in tandem with asset growth.  However, management is conscious of the impact that either rapid expansion or lower than projected earnings may potentially have on deteriorating Riverview’s capital position.  Management proactively monitors the capital levels to ensure that they remain well in line with regulatory requirements, and is positioned to enact appropriate measures to ensure the strength of Riverview’s capital position.  While Riverview continues to look for growth opportunities, there are no other known events, trends or circumstances that would adversely impact capital.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

                In January 2009, Riverview implemented a nonqualified stock option plan.  The purpose of the 2009 Stock Option Plan was to advance the development, growth and financial condition of the Corporation by providing incentives through participation in the appreciation of the common stock of the Corporation to secure, retain and motivate the Corporation’s directors, officers and key employees and to align such person’s interests with those of the Corporation’s shareholders.  The following table discloses the number of outstanding options granted by Riverview to participants in equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders, as well as the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plans.

 

 

 

Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options

 

Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan

 

170,000

 

$

16.00

 

-0-

 

 

The vesting schedule is a seven year cliff, which means that the options are 100% vested in 2016, which is the seventh year following the grant date and expire in 2019, which is ten years following the grant date.  Additional information relating to the 2009 Stock Option Plan can be found in Note 9 — Pension and Other Benefit Plans — in Part II, Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — incorporated in this Form 10-K.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

Riverview’s financial statements do not reflect various off-balance sheet arrangements that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk.  These commitments consist mainly of loans approved but not yet funded, unused lines of credit and letters of credit made under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments.  Unused commitments at December 31, 2009, were $19,991,000.  Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to Riverview.  Refer to Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the nature, business purpose and importance of Riverview’s off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

Management believes that any amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations.  Riverview has no investment in or financial relationship with any unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity or the availability of capital resources.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity refers to Riverview’s ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet financial obligations to its customers in order to fund loans, to respond to deposit outflows and to cover operating expenses.  Maintaining a level of liquid funds through asset/liability management seeks to ensure that these needs are met at a reasonable cost.  Liquidity is essential to compensate for fluctuations in the balance sheet and provide funds for growth and normal operating expenditures.  Sources of liquidity are provided on a continuous basis through scheduled and unscheduled principal reductions and interest payments on outstanding loans and investment securities.  Liquidity needs may also be met by converting assets into cash or obtaining sources of additional funding, whether through deposit growth, securities sold under agreements to repurchase or borrowings under lines of credit with correspondent banks.

 

Liquidity from the asset category is provided through cash, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold, which totaled $27,533,000 at December 31, 2009 as compared to $6,968,000 at December 31, 2008.  While liquidity sources generated from assets include scheduled and prepayments of principal and interest from securities and loans in Riverview’s portfolios, longer-term liquidity needs may be met by selling securities available-for-sale, selling loans or raising additional capital.  At December 31, 2009, unpledged available-for-sale securities with a carrying value of $13,203,000 were readily available for liquidity purposes, as compared with $11,362,000 at December 31, 2008.  The increase of $1,841,000 in unpledged available-for-sale securities was attributable to the growth in the investment portfolio and reducing collateral requirements as a result of paying off short-term FHLB borrowings.

 

On the liability side, the primary source of funds available to meet liquidity needs is to attract deposits at competitive rates.  The Bank’s core deposits, which exclude certificates of deposit $100,000 and over, were $184,805,000 at December 31, 2009 as compared to $143,279,000 at December 31, 2008.  The increase in core deposits is the result of the consolidation and organic deposit growth attributable to the Bank’s Hometown Checking demand deposit product.  Core deposits have historically provided a source of relatively stable and low cost liquidity, as has also been the case for securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  Short-term and long-term borrowings utilizing the federal funds line and credit facility established with a correspondent financial institution and the FHLB are also considered to be reliable sources for funding.  As of December 31, 2009, Riverview had access to two formal borrowing lines totaling $95,218,000 with the aggregate amount outstanding on these lines totaling $10,678,000.

 

There are a number of factors that may impact Riverview’s liquidity position.  Changes in interest rates, local economic conditions and the competitive marketplace can influence prepayments on investment securities, loan fundings and payments, and deposit flows.  Management is of the opinion that its liquidity position at December 31, 2009 is adequate to respond to fluctuations “on” and “off” the balance sheet since it manages liquidity on a daily basis and expects to have sufficient funds to meet all of its funding requirements.

 

Except as discussed above, there are no known demands, trends, commitments, events or uncertainties that may result in, or that are reasonably likely to result in Riverview’s inability to meet anticipated or unexpected needs.

 

Effects of Inflation

 

The impact of inflation upon financial institutions can affect assets and liabilities through the movement of interest rates.  The exact impact of inflation on Riverview is difficult to measure.  Inflation may cause operating expenses to change at a rate not matched by the change in earnings.  Inflation may affect the borrowing needs and desires of consumer and commercial customers, in turn affecting the growth of Riverview’s assets.  Inflation may also affect the level of interest rates in the general market, which in turn can affect Riverview’s profitability and the market value of assets held.  Riverview actively manages its interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities countering the effects of inflation.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

Return on Equity and Assets

 

The following table presents ratios as of the dates presented:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average assets

 

0.46

%

0.29

%

0.47

%

Return on average equity

 

4.45

%

2.90

%

4.34

%

Dividend payout ratio

 

66.25

%

79.49

%

55.36

%

Average equity to average assets ratio

 

10.28

%

9.91

%

10.74

%

 

New Financial Accounting Standards

 

Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements discusses the expected impact on Riverview’s financial condition and results of operations for recently issued or proposed accounting standards that have not been adopted.  To the extent we anticipate a significant impact to Riverview’s financial condition or results of operations, appropriate discussion takes place in the applicable note to the consolidated financial statements.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Not Applicable.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

39

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

41

Consolidated Statements of Income

42

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

43

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

44

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

45

 

38



Table of Contents

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Riverview Financial Corporation
Halifax, Pennsylvania

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Riverview Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.  Riverview Financial Corporation’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Riverview Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

 

/s/ Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC

 

 

 

 

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

 

March 24, 2010

 

 

39


 


Table of Contents

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Riverview Financial Corporation
Halifax, Pennsylvania

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Riverview Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.  Riverview Financial Corporation’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Riverview Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

 

 

ParenteBeard LLC

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

April 7, 2009

 

40



Table of Contents

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands, except share data)

 

Assets

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

6,339

 

$

4,545

 

Federal funds sold

 

 

1,034

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

18,494

 

439

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

24,833

 

6,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing time deposits with banks

 

2,700

 

950

 

Investment securities available-for-sale

 

34,583

 

28,120

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

1,124

 

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,560 and $1,710

 

170,384

 

176,469

 

Premises and equipment

 

7,238

 

7,472

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

782

 

812

 

Restricted investments in bank stocks

 

2,410

 

2,075

 

Cash value of life insurance

 

5,574

 

5,258

 

Foreclosed assets

 

312

 

144

 

Goodwill

 

1,796

 

1,785

 

Intangible assets

 

141

 

173

 

Other assets

 

2,185

 

1,511

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

252,938

 

$

231,911

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Demand, non-interest bearing

 

$

19,299

 

$

19,614

 

Demand, interest-bearing

 

69,833

 

25,789

 

Savings and money market

 

27,999

 

27,877

 

Time

 

97,805

 

101,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Deposits

 

214,936

 

174,353

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

807

 

21,323

 

Long-term borrowings

 

10,697

 

10,033

 

Accrued interest payable

 

389

 

499

 

Other liabilities

 

1,392

 

1,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

228,221

 

207,706

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.50 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,750,003 shares

 

875

 

875

 

Surplus

 

11,252

 

11,239

 

Retained earnings

 

12,429

 

12,054

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

161

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Shareholders’ Equity

 

24,717

 

24,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

$

252,938

 

$

231,911

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Interest and Dividend Income

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, including fees

 

$

11,021

 

$

6,406

 

Investment securities - taxable

 

514

 

558

 

Investment securities - tax exempt

 

453

 

137

 

Federal funds sold

 

4

 

28

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

140

 

3

 

Dividends

 

18

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Interest Income

 

12,150

 

7,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

4,473

 

2,295

 

Short-term borrowings

 

49

 

152

 

Long-term debt

 

338

 

597

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Interest Expense

 

4,860

 

3,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Income

 

7,290

 

4,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Loan Losses

 

1,125

 

380

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses

 

6,165

 

3,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest Income

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

288

 

156

 

Other service charges and fees

 

358

 

220

 

Earnings on cash value of life insurance

 

262

 

100

 

Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

 

287

 

40

 

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

 

443

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Noninterest Income

 

1,638

 

566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

3,048

 

2,205

 

Occupancy expenses

 

675

 

449

 

Equipment expenses

 

425

 

213

 

Telecommunication and processing charges

 

480

 

243

 

Postage and office supplies

 

225

 

94

 

FDIC premium

 

433

 

45

 

Bank shares tax expense

 

257

 

104

 

Directors’ compensation

 

219

 

105

 

Professional services

 

266

 

187

 

Other expenses

 

511

 

338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Noninterest Expenses

 

6,539

 

3,983

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before Income Taxes (Benefit)

 

1,264

 

329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicable Federal Income Taxes (Benefit)

 

153

 

(42

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

1,111

 

$

371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Per Share - Basic and Diluted

 

$

0.63

 

$

0.39

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

42



Table of Contents

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Common
Stock

 

Surplus

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 

Total
Shareholders’
Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1, 2008

 

$

481

 

$

317

 

$

11,983

 

$

(26

)

$

12,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

371

 

 

371

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

63

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

434

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock in exchange for HNB Bancorp, Inc. common stock

 

394

 

10,922

 

 

 

11,316

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends, $0.31 per share

 

 

 

(300

)

 

(300

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2008

 

875

 

11,239

 

12,054

 

37

 

24,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

1,111

 

 

1,111

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

124

 

124

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation cost of option grants

 

 

13

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends, $0.42 per share

 

 

 

(736

)

 

(736

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2009

 

$

875

 

$

11,252

 

$

12,429

 

$

161

 

$

24,717

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

43



Table of Contents

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,111

 

$

371

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

567

 

332

 

Provision for loan losses

 

1,125

 

380

 

Granting of stock options

 

13

 

 

Net amortization of premiums on securities available-for-sale

 

150

 

48

 

Net realized gain on sale of securities available-for-sale

 

(287

)

(40

)

Amortization of intangible assets

 

32

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(115

)

(147

)

Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans

 

30,862

 

3,715

 

Net gain on sale of mortgage loans

 

(443

)

(50

)

Mortgage loans originated for sale

 

(29,295

)

(4,789

)

Earnings on cash value of life insurance

 

(236

)

(100

)

Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets

 

(593

)

(458

)

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities

 

(216

)

330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

 

2,675

 

(408

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net purchases of interest-bearing time deposits

 

(1,750

)

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments

 

13,515

 

8,651

 

Proceeds from sales

 

6,942

 

2,731

 

Purchases

 

(26,595

)

(6,001

)

Net increase in restricted stock

 

(335

)

(566

)

Net (increase) decrease in loans

 

4,648

 

(26,976

)

Net cash acquired in business combination

 

 

2,870

 

Purchases of premises and equipment

 

(333

)

(279

)

Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets

 

144

 

327

 

Capitalized business combination transaction costs

 

(11

)

 

Purchase of life insurance

 

(249

)

 

Proceeds from life insurance

 

169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

 

(3,855

)

(19,243

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in deposits

 

40,583

 

6,175

 

Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings

 

(20,516

)

16,622

 

Proceeds from long-term borrowings

 

5,678

 

2,500

 

Payments on long-term borrowings

 

(5,014

)

(8,411

)

Dividends paid

 

(736

)

(300

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

19,995

 

16,586

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

18,815

 

(3,065

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning

 

6,018

 

9,083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending

 

$

24,833

 

$

6,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplementary Cash Flows Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

4,928

 

$

3,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

 

$

255

 

$

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets

 

$

312

 

$

144

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

44



Table of Contents

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Nature of Operations

 

On December 31, 2008, Riverview Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”) was formed and effected the consolidation of First Perry Bancorp (“First Perry”), Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The First National Bank of Marysville, and HNB Bancorp (“HNB”), Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Halifax National Bank.  Immediately thereafter, The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank were consolidated with and into Riverview National Bank (the “Bank”), the wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation.  The current branches of The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank continue to operate under their current names as divisions of the Bank.

 

The Corporation and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary provide loan, deposit and other commercial banking services through four full service offices in Marysville, Duncannon and Enola, Perry County, Pennsylvania, one full service office in Hampden Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania and three full service and one drive-up office in Halifax, Millersburg and Elizabethville, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.  The Corporation competes with several other financial institutions to provide its services to individuals, businesses, municipalities and other organizations.  The Corporation is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board while the Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

 

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation conform to generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry.  The following paragraphs briefly describe the more significant accounting policies.

 

Basis of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Riverview Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverview National Bank.  The Corporation was formed in 2008 and became operational upon its acquisition of First Perry, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Consolidation that was consummated on December 31, 2008.  The combined financial information reflects the impact of the consolidation of First Perry’s and HNB’s combined financial condition under the purchase method of accounting with First Perry treated as the acquirer from an accounting standpoint.  Under this method of accounting, Riverview was formed and treated as a recapitalization of First Perry, with First Perry’s assets and liabilities recorded at their historical values, and HNB’s at their fair values on the date the consolidation was completed.  The financial information relating to the periods prior to December 31, 2008 of First Perry, the acquirer, is reported under the name of Riverview Financial Corporation.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent

 

45



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the potential impairment of  goodwill and restricted stock, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment on securities and the valuation of real estate acquired by foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans.  The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions.  In connection with the determination of the estimated losses on loans and foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisals for significant collateral.

 

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions.  In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans.  Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additional losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.  Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term.  However, the amount of the change that is reasonably possible cannot be estimated.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents, for purposes of the statement of cash flows, consist of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banks.  Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one day periods.

 

Investment Securities

 

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the classifications as of each balance sheet date.

 

Investment securities available-for-sale are those securities that the Corporation intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily to maturity.  Any decision to sell a security classified as available-for-sale would be based on various factors, including movements in interest rates, changes in the maturity mix of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities, liquidity needs, regulatory considerations and other similar factors.  Investment securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value.  Unrealized gains or losses are reported as changes in other comprehensive income, net of the related deferred tax effect.  Any realized gains or losses, based on the amortized cost of specific securities sold, are included in current operations.  Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities.

 

Through December 31, 2009, unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on investment securities available-for-sale were reported as a net amount in a separate component (“accumulated other comprehensive income”) of shareholders’ equity until realized.  In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting pronouncement (ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities) that amends other-than-temporary

 

46



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

impairment (OTTI) guidance for debt securities.  The pronouncement changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary to debt securities and replaces the existing requirement that the Corporation’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with the requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) whether it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis.  Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are considered to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses.  The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.  The pronouncement does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI of equity securities.  The pronouncement is effective for the year ended December 31, 2009 and had no significant impact to the Corporation’s financial statements.

 

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

 

Mortgage loans originated and held for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate.  During 2009, the Bank entered into an agreement with Freddie Mac to sell loans with servicing release.  This was in addition to the agreement that the Bank entered into in 2008 to sell loans service released under the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh’s (“FHLB”) Mortgage Partnership Finance program (“MPF”). Premiums and discounts and origination fees and cost on loans held for sale are deferred and recognized as a component of the gain or loss on sale.  Loan sales under the Freddie Mac and MPF programs have been made on a recourse basis.  Recourse obligations, if any, are determined based upon an estimate of probable credit losses over the term of the loan, and are not material to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Loans

 

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at unpaid principal balances net of unearned income, deferred loan fees, and the allowance for loan losses.  Interest is computed based on the principal balances outstanding and is credited to income as earned.  Loan fees collected net of the costs of originating the loans are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield over the contractual life of the related loan.

 

The accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing.  A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured.  When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and all unpaid interest accrued is charged against the allowance for loan losses.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal.  Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.

 

47



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

Purchased loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration for which it is probable at purchase that all contractually required payments will not be collected are accounted for under an accounting standard relating to Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired at Transfer.  This standard addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality.  This standard requires impaired loans to be recorded at fair value and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances in the initial accounting for loans acquired in a transfer, including loans acquired in a purchase business combination.  Under this standard, the excess of cash flows expected at purchase over the purchase price is recognized as interest income over the life of the loans.  Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the loan’s yield over its remaining life.  Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings.  Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed.  Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

 

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

 

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components.  The specific component relates to loans that are classified as substandard or doubtful and deemed to be impaired.  For such loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.  The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.  An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.  The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

 

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present

 

48



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

 

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.  Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.

 

Premises and Equipment

 

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method for financial reporting and the straight-line and accelerated methods for income tax purposes.  When property is retired or disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.  Major additions or replacements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

 

Accrued Interest

 

Accrued interest is interest that has accumulated over a period of time and has been recognized even though the obligation to receive or pay has not occurred.  Accrued interest can either be income, such as the receipt of interest from loans or securities, or it can be an expense, such as the payment of interest on deposits and borrowings.

 

Restricted Investments in Bank Stocks

 

Restricted stock, which represents required investments in the common stock of correspondent banks, is carried at cost and as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, consists of the common stock of the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank.  In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock.

 

Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment in accordance with the accounting standard relating to Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others.  Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on its assessment of the ultimate recoverability of the cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value.  The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of the cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

 

Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the restricted stock as of December 31, 2009.

 

Transfers of Financial Assets

 

Transfers of financial assets, including loans and loan participation sales, are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered.  Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the corporation , (2) the

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and (3) the corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

 

Cash Value of Life Insurance

 

The Corporation invests in bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) as a source of funding employee benefit expenses.  BOLI involves the purchase of life insurance by the Corporation on a chosen group of directors and select management of the Bank.  The Corporation is the owner and beneficiary of the policies.  The life insurance investment is carried at the cash surrender value of the underlying policies.  These amounts are immediately available to the Corporation upon surrender of the policies.  Income generated from the increase in the cash surrender value of the policies is included in other income on the income statement.

 

Foreclosed Assets

 

Real estate and other foreclosed assets acquired in settlement of loans are carried at fair value of the property at the date of acquisition.  Subsequent to acquisition, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value of the property less selling costs.  Any write-down, at or prior to the dates the assets are foreclosed on, is charged to the allowance for loan losses.  Subsequent write-downs and expenses incurred in connection with holding such assets are reported in other expenses.  Any gains or losses resulting from the sale of foreclosed assets are recorded in other income.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired.  As a result of the adoption of the accounting standard relating to Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, business acquisition goodwill is no longer amortized into the income statement over an estimated life, but rather is tested at least annually for impairment.  Based upon the goodwill analysis performed by an independent third party, there was no goodwill impairment for the 2009 year end.

 

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights.  The Corporation’s intangible assets consist of a core deposit intangible, which has a finite life and is amortized over its estimated useful life.  Intangible assets are also subject to impairment testing when an indication of impairment exists.

 

Federal Income Taxes

 

The provision for income taxes is based on income as reported in the financial statements.  Certain items of income and expense are recognized in different periods for financial reporting purposes than for federal income tax purposes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method.  Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between book and tax basis of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities given current recognition to

 

50



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

changes in tax rates and laws.  As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for applicable income taxes.

 

On January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted the provisions of an accounting standard relating to Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of Accounting for Income Taxes, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions.  The adoption of this accounting standard did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.  The Corporation’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits, if any, in the income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.  The tax years subject to examination by the taxing authorities are the tax years ended December 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006.  See Note 10 for further discussion.

 

Advertising

 

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $43,000 and $29,000 for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Earnings Per Common Share

 

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  For diluted earnings per share, net income is divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental number of shares added as a result of converting common stock equivalents.  The Corporation’s common stock equivalents consist of outstanding common stock options, which amounted to 170,000 options as of the 2009 year end as compared with none as of the 2008 year end.  The following table presents the amounts used in computing earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

 

 

Income
Numerator

 

Common Shares
Denominator

 

EPS

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

1,111

 

1,750

 

$

0.63

 

 

Dilutive effect of potential common stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

1,111

 

1,750

 

$

0.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

371

 

963

 

$

0.39

 

 

Dilutive effect of potential common stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

371

 

963

 

$

0.39

 

 

Earnings and dividends per share have been adjusted to reflect the additional shares exchanged to First Perry and HNB shareholders upon the formation of the Corporation as of December 31, 2008.

 

51



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

Off Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered into off balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they become payable.

 

Segment Reporting

 

The Corporation operates in a single business segment consisting of traditional banking activities.

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be included in net income.  Changes in certain assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet.  Such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which represents a component of shareholders’ equity, represents the net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale, net of taxes.

 

The components of other comprehensive income and related tax effects for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities

 

$

475

 

$

135

 

Less reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income

 

(287

)

(40

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Unrealized Gains

 

188

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax effect

 

64

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net of Tax Amount

 

$

124

 

$

63

 

 

Reclassifications

 

For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2009 presentation.  Such reclassifications had no impact on net income.

 

New Accounting Standards

 

In December 2007, a new standard relating to Business Combinations was released.  The standard significantly changed the financial accounting and reporting of business combination transactions.  It establishes principles for how an acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  This standard is effective for acquisition dates on or after the beginning of an entity’s first year that begins after December 15, 2008.  This pronouncement will impact the Corporation’s accounting for business combinations consummated after January 1, 2009.

 

52



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

In April 2009, a new accounting standard was issued relating to Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies.  This standard amends and clarifies the Business Combination standard to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination.  This new standard is effective for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 111 (SAB 111).  SAB 111 amended and replaced SAB Topic 5.M. in the SAB Series entitled Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.  SAB 111 maintains the SEC Staff’s previous views related to equity securities and amends Topic 5.M. to exclude debt securities from its scope.  The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SAB 111 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2009, a new standard was released regarding Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to the Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities standard.  This statement prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets.  Specifically, among other aspects, this standard also amends the previous standard by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying generally accepted accounting principles related to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities.  It also modifies the financial-components approach previously used in accordance with the original standard.  This new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.  The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.

 

In June 2009, a new standard relating to The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 was issued.  This standard establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.  This standard is effective immediately. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.

 

In June 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 112 (SAB 112). SAB 112 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretative guidance included in the codification of SABs in order to make the interpretive guidance consistent with current U.S. GAAP.  The Corporation does not expect the adoption of SAB 112 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 (ASU 2009-05), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. ASU 2009-05 amends Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Overall,

 

53



Table of Contents

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

 

and provides clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period including interim period beginning after issuance.  The Corporation does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 (ASU 2009-12), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). ASU 2009-12 provides guidance on estimating the fair value of alternative investments. ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009.  The Corporation does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-12 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In October 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No. 33-99072, Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Exchange Act Periodic Reports of Non-Accelerated Filers.  Release No. 33-99072 delays the requirement for non-accelerated filers to include an attestation report of their independent auditor on internal control over financial reporting with their annual report until the fiscal year ending on or after June 15, 2010.

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events.  The guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events.  Subsequent events are events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.  The guidance is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The adoption of this guidance was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

 

The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-6 (ASU 2010-6), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.  The ASU amends Subtopic 820-10 with new disclosure requirements and clarification of existing disclosure requirements.  New disclosures required include the amount of significant transfers in and out of levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers.  In addition, the reconciliation for level 3 activity will be required on a gross rather than net basis.  The ASU provides additional guidance related to the level of disaggregation in determining classes of assets and liabilities and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques.  The amendments are effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the reconciliation for Level 3 activity on a gross basis which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.

 

Note 2 — Business Combinations

 

Effective December 31, 2008, the Corporation completed its consolidation of First Perry and HNB in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Consolidation dated June 18, 2008.  As part of the transaction, The First National Bank of Marysville, the wholly-owned subsidiary of First Perry, and Halifax National Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of HNB, consolidated with and into Riverview National Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation.  The primary reason for the combination was to pool resources to provide greater products and services to customers in the contiguous counties, and provide cost savings through the consolidation of operations.

 

In the consolidation, the Corporation issued 1,750,003 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.50 per share.  The shareholders of First Perry received 2.435 shares of the Corporation’s

 

54



Table of Contents

 

Note 2 — Business Combinations (Continued)

 

common stock for each share of First Perry common stock they owned on the effective date of the consolidation.  HNB shareholders received 2.520 shares of the Corporation’s common stock for each share of HNB common stock they owned on the effective date of the consolidation.  The shareholders of First Perry and HNB did not recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes on the shares that were exchanged for the Corporation’s common stock in the consolidation.

 

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the effective date of the consolidation.  This transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of the accounting standard relating to Business Combinations.  Accordingly the purchase price was allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values as of the effective date of the consolidation.

 

 

 

At December 31, 2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,870

 

Investment securities

 

13,124

 

Loans

 

67,579

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

(496

)

Net loans

 

67,083

 

Other assets

 

7,318

 

Total assets

 

90,395

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 

$

7,725

 

Interest-bearing deposits

 

65,981

 

Short-term borrowings

 

3,436

 

Long-term borrowings

 

2,533

 

Other liabilities

 

890

 

Total liabilities

 

80,565

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

9,830

 

 

55



Table of Contents

 

Note 2 — Business Combinations (Continued)

 

The excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.  Goodwill of $1,796,000 was recorded in connection with the consolidation.  The goodwill will not be amortized in accordance with SFAS No. 142 and is not deductible for tax purposes.

 

The following table provides the calculation of the goodwill (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

 

Purchase Price:

 

 

 

 

 

HNB common shares outstanding

 

312,500

 

 

 

Exchange ratio

 

2.52

 

 

 

Riverview common stock issued

 

787,478

 

 

 

Fair market value of Riverview common share

 

$

14.37

 

 

 

Purchase price assigned to shares exchanged for stock

 

 

 

$

11,316

 

Transaction costs

 

 

 

310

 

Total Purchase Price

 

 

 

11,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Assets Acquired:

 

 

 

 

 

HNB shareholders’ equity

 

9,881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) to reflect assets acquired at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

Loans (sum of the years method amortized over 13 years)

 

(164

)

 

 

Core deposit intangible (sum of the years method amortized over 8 years)

 

173

 

 

 

Bank premises, furniture, fixtures and equipment (39 year weighted average life)

 

71

 

 

 

Deferred tax asset

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease to reflect liabilities acquired at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

Time deposits (level yield amortization method over 3 years)

 

(124

)

 

 

Borrowings (level yield amortization method over 3 years)

 

(33

)

 

 

Net assets acquired

 

 

 

9,830

 

Goodwill resulting from consolidation

 

 

 

$

1,796

 

 

The fair value of certain assets and certain liabilities were based on quoted prices from reliable market sources.  When quoted market prices were not available, the estimated fair values were based upon the best information available, including obtaining prices for similar assets and liabilities, and the results of using other valuation techniques.  The prominent other valuation techniques used were the present value technique and appraisal/third party valuations.  When the present value technique was employed, the associated cash flow estimates incorporated assumptions that marketplace participants would use in estimating fair values.  In instances where reliable market information was not available, the Corporation assumed the historical book value of certain assets and liabilities represented a reasonable proxy of fair value.  The Corporation determined that there were no other categories of identifiable intangible assets arising from the HNB consolidation other than the core deposit intangible.

 

56



Table of Contents

 

Note 2 — Business Combinations (Continued)

 

The following are the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008 as though HNB had been consolidated on January 1, 2008:

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

Total interest income

 

$

12,285

 

Total interest expense

 

5,184

 

Net interest income

 

7,101

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

955

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

6,146

 

 

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

 

1,333

 

Total noninterest expense

 

7,383

 

Income before taxes (benefit)

 

96

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

(201

)

Net income

 

$

297

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.17

 

 

The above 2008 pro forma amounts include HNB’s pre-tax one time gain from the sale of real estate for $456,000, and pre-tax expenses associated with the merger of $455,000.

 

Note 3 - Restriction on Cash and Due from Banks

 

The Bank is required to maintain average reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank.  The required reserve at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $3,055,000 and $581,000, respectively.  In addition, the Bank’s other correspondents may require average compensating balances as part of their agreements to provide services.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities available-for-sale are reflected in the following schedules at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

2009

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

2,354

 

$

21

 

$

 

$

2,375

 

State and municipal

 

14,746

 

220

 

16

 

14,950

 

Mortgaged-backed securities

 

17,238

 

82

 

62

 

17,258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

34,338

 

$

323

 

$

78

 

$

34,583

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

7,236

 

$

28

 

$

 

$

7,264

 

State and municipal

 

9,363

 

10

 

 

9,373

 

Mortgaged-backed securities

 

11,163

 

56

 

38

 

11,181

 

Corporate debt securities

 

302

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

28,064

 

$

94

 

$

38

 

$

28,120

 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties:

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Fair
Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

508

 

$

512

 

Due after one year through five years

 

2,726

 

2,748

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

5,192

 

5,315

 

Due after ten years

 

8,674

 

8,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,100

 

17,325

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

17,238

 

17,258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

34,338

 

$

34,583

 

 

58



Table of Contents

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities Available-for-Sale (Continued)

 

Securities with an amortized cost of $21,157,000 and $16,702,000 and a fair value of $21,380,000 and $16,755,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

 

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2009 and 2008 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position are as follows:

 

 

 

Less Than 12 Months

 

More Than 12 Months

 

Total

 

 

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and municipal

 

$

1,448

 

$

16

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,448

 

$

16

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

6,138

 

46

 

1,386

 

16

 

7,524

 

62

 

 

 

$

7,586

 

$

62

 

$

1,386

 

$

16

 

$

8,972

 

$

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

$

4,980

 

$

37

 

$

99

 

$

1

 

$

5,079

 

$

38

 

 

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment, at least on a quarterly basis.  It is management’s intent to hold all investments until maturity unless market, economic, credit quality or specific investment concerns warrant a sale of securities.  Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the credit quality or financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

 

At December 31, 2009, three mortgage-backed securities and four state and municipal bonds had unrealized losses as compared with eight mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2008.  Management believes the unrealized losses relate to changes in interest rates since the individual securities were purchased and as opposed to underlying credit issues.  As management does not intend to sell any debt securities, and it is more likely than not that management will not be required to sell any debt securities before the cost bases are recovered, no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary.

 

As part of its strategy to reduce some of the risk inherent within the investment portfolio, the Bank sold 21 available-for-sale securities during 2009 totaling $6,683,000.  Gross realized gains amounted to $294,000, while gross realized losses amounted to $7,000, resulting in a $287,000 net gain on sale.

 

59



Table of Contents

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses

 

Loans receivable consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural

 

$

13,614

 

$

12,967

 

Real estate secured:

 

 

 

 

 

Construction

 

17,372

 

18,173

 

Mortgage

 

92,206

 

94,322

 

Commercial

 

46,728

 

48,773

 

Consumer installment

 

2,988

 

4,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,908

 

178,445

 

Deferred loan fees

 

36

 

(266

)

Allowance for loan losses

 

(2,560

)

(1,710

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

170,384

 

$

176,469

 

 

Included within the loan portfolio are loans on which the Corporation discontinued the accrual of interest.  Such loans approximated $3,123,000 and $128,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  If interest income had been recorded on all non-accrual loans outstanding during 2009 and 2008, interest income would have increased by $193,000 and $2,000, respectively.

 

Loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing interest at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $219,000 and $152,000, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the total recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $4,328,000 and $3,203,000, respectively, of which $3,550,000 and $668,000 required a valuation allowance, which approximated $1,047,000 and $225,000, respectively.  The average investment in impaired loans for 2009 and 2008 was approximately $4,963,000 and $1,395,000, respectively.  Interest income recognized on impaired loans was approximately $185,000 in 2009 and $122,000 in 2008.

 

The Corporation’s assessment of loans acquired in the acquisition of HNB as of December 31, 2008 identified loans totaling $3,010,000 for which a $475,000 purchase accounting adjustment was netted against the loan balance in accordance with the provisions of SOP 03-3.  As a result of the application of SOP 03-3, the Corporation recorded a purchase accounting adjustment of $475,000 as of the 2008 year end, which reduced loans and the allowance for loan losses.  Management does not expect to recover any of the $475,000.  During 2009, the remaining balance of all of the loans giving rise to the $475,000 purchase accounting adjustment were either collected or charged against the allowance for loan losses.

 

60



Table of Contents

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

 

An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance – January 1

 

$

1,710

 

$

970

 

Provision charged to operations

 

1,125

 

380

 

Acquired from HNB acquisition

 

 

496

 

Recoveries on charged off loans

 

1

 

23

 

Loans charged off

 

(276

)

(159

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31

 

$

2,560

 

$

1,710

 

 

The Corporation, in the ordinary course of business, has loan, deposit and other routine transactions with its executive officers, directors and entities in which they have principal ownership.  Loans are made to such related parties at substantially the same credit terms as other borrowers and do not represent more than the usual risk of collection.

 

Activity for these related party loans was as follows for the year ended December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

 

Balance - January 1

 

$

4,708

 

Advances

 

945

 

Payments

 

1,360

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31

 

$

4,293

 

 

Note 6 - Premises and Equipment

 

Premises and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

Estimated Useful
Life

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

$

741

 

$

741

 

Bank premises

 

7 - 50 years

 

4,545

 

4,459

 

Leasehold improvements

 

10 - 30 years

 

1,899

 

1,899

 

Furnishings and equipment

 

3 - 10 years

 

2,145

 

1,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,330

 

9,009

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

(2,092

)

(1,537

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,238

 

$

7,472

 

 

61



Table of Contents

 

Note 6 - Premises and Equipment (Continued)

 

Operating Leases

 

The Corporation entered into a fifteen year operating lease agreement in 2003 for the land on which the Duncannon office is located.  In 2005, the Corporation entered into an agreement to lease an office on Good Hope Road in Hampden Township, Cumberland County, on which lease payments began in 2006 and extend through 2017.  In January 2007, the Corporation entered into an agreement to lease office space in Linglestown, Dauphin County, on which lease payments began in 2007 and extend for a three year period. As part of the consolidation, the Corporation assumed the lease of HNB’s branch in Elizabethville, Dauphin County, which began in 2008 and expires 2018.  The Corporation is responsible for taxes, utilities and other expenses related to the properties.  All of the lease agreements contain renewal options.  Total expense for operating leases in 2009 and 2008 was $120,000 and $77,000, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2009, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable lease arrangements are as follows (in thousands):

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

$

122

 

2011

 

127

 

2012

 

127

 

2013

 

92

 

2014

 

93

 

Thereafter

 

197

 

 

Note 7 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill and intangible assets were $1,937,000 at December 31, 2009 and $1,958,000 at December 31, 2008.

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

Balance - January 1

 

$

1,785

 

$

 

Additions to goodwill from acquisition of HNB

 

11

 

1,785

 

Balance - December 31

 

$

1,796

 

$

1,785

 

 

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization related to the core deposit intangible at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core deposit intangible

 

$

173

 

$

32

 

$

173

 

$

 

 

Amortized expense of $32,000 and $-0- for 2009 and 2008, respectively, is included in other expenses.

 

62



Table of Contents

 

Note 7 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)

 

The amortization period of the core deposit intangible is based on the sum of the years method over an eight year period.  The Corporation estimates the amortization expense for the core deposit intangible as follows (in thousands):

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

$

28

 

2011

 

25

 

2012

 

22

 

2013

 

19

 

2014

 

19

 

Thereafter

 

28

 

 

 

$

141

 

 

Based upon the goodwill analysis performed by an independent third party, there was no goodwill impairment for the 2009 year end.

 

Note 8 - Deposits

 

Scheduled contractual maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

 

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

$

59,419

 

2011

 

16,016

 

2012

 

5,751

 

2013

 

11,781

 

2014

 

4,082

 

Thereafter

 

756

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

97,805

 

 

Time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $30,131,000 and $31,056,000, respectively.

 

Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000 or more, approximated $1,172,000 and $624,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

The Corporation accepts deposits of its executive officers, directors, their immediate families, and affiliated companies on the same terms as those for comparable transactions of unrelated customers.  The amount of these deposits totaled $2,747,000 and $2,365,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Note 9 - Pension and Other Benefit Plans

 

Defined Contribution Plan

 

The Corporation maintains a contributory 401(k) retirement plan for all eligible employees.  Currently, the Corporation’s policy is to match 100% of the employees’ voluntary contribution to the plan up to a maximum of 4% of the employees’ compensation.  Additionally, the Corporation

 

63



Table of Contents

 

Note 9 - Pension and Other Benefit Plans (Continued)

 

may make discretionary contributions to the plan after considering current profits and business conditions.  The amount charged to expense in 2009 and 2008 totaled $198,000 and $105,000, respectively.  Of these amounts, discretionary contributions approximated $111,000 and $84,000, respectively.

 

Director Emeritus Plan

 

To promote orderly succession of the Corporation’s Board of Directors, the Corporation adopted the “Director Emeritus Agreement” in 2001.  The agreement provides for a defined annual benefit based upon a percentage of the Director’s final fee.  The benefit can be offered to a Director upon termination of service on or after 65 years of age provided the Director has ten or more years of continuous service at the date of termination.  Provisions of the agreement are contingent on the Director electing to become a Director Emeritus, being available to act in the capacity of consultant to the Board, continuing to act as a “Goodwill Ambassador” for the Corporation, and avoiding any competitive arrangements that are contrary to the best interests of the Corporation.  The agreement also contains other general limitations and death benefit provisions.  Expenses recorded under the terms of this agreement were $12,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Deferred Compensation Agreements

 

The Corporation maintains four Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) agreements to provide specified benefits for key executives.  The agreements were specifically designed to encourage key executives to remain as employees of the Corporation.  The agreements are unfunded with benefits to be paid from the Corporation’s general assets.  After normal retirement, benefits are payable to the executive or his or her beneficiary in equal monthly installments for a period of either 15 for the two executives who were formally with Halifax National Bank and 20 years for the two executives who were formally with The First National Bank of Marysville.  There are provisions for death benefits should a participant die before his or her retirement date.  These benefits are also subject to change of control and other provisions

 

The Corporation also maintains a “Director Deferred Fee Agreement” (DDFA) which allows electing directors to defer payment of their directors’ fees until a future date.  The estimated present value of the future benefits is accrued over the effective dates of the agreement using an interest factor computed as a percent of the Corporation’s return on equity.  The agreements are unfunded, with benefits to be paid from the Corporation’s general assets.

 

The accrued benefit obligations of the two plans of $466,000 at December 31, 2009 and $357,000 at December 31, 2008 are included in other liabilities.  Expense related to these plans totaled $72,000 and $33,000 in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Stock Option Plan

 

In January 2009 the Corporation implemented a nonqualified stock option plan.  The purpose of the 2009 Stock Option Plan was to advance the development, growth and financial condition of the Corporation by providing incentives through participation in the appreciation of the common stock of the Corporation to secure, retain and motivate the Corporation’s directors, officers and key employees and to align such person’s interests with those of the Corporation’s shareholders.  Shares of the Corporation’s common stock that may be issued or transferred under this plan shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 170,000 shares at an exercise price of $16.00 per share.  The vesting schedule is a seven year cliff, which means that the options are 100% vested in the seventh year

 

64



Table of Contents

 

Note 9 - Pension and Other Benefit Plans (Continued)

 

following the grant date and the expiration date is ten years following the grant date.  As of December 31, 2009 none of the option grants were vested or exercisable.

 

During 2009, the Corporation granted 155,000 options on January 21, 2009, of which 7,000 options were forfeited in April 2009, and 22,000 options on September 16, 2009.  A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plan as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

 

Options

 

Shares

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price Per
Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding – January 1, 2009

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

177,000

 

16.00

 

Forfeited

 

7,000

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding – December 31, 2009

 

170,000

 

$

16.00

 

Options exercisable at year end

 

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options per share granted during the year

 

$

0.86

 

 

 

Remaining contractual life

 

9 years

 

 

 

 

No stock option plans were in existence prior to January 2009.

 

There was no intrinsic value associated with the outstanding stock options at December 31, 2009 because the exercise price for each of the options was higher than the trading price of the stock.  No options were exercised during 2009.

 

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions.

 

 

 

2009 Option Grants

 

 

 

January

 

September

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend yield

 

2.50

%

3.31

%

Expected life

 

8 years

 

8 years

 

Expected volatility

 

12.22

%

12.22

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.07

%

3.07

%

 

65



Table of Contents

 

Note 10 - Taxes

 

Income tax expense (benefit) and the related effective income tax rates are comprised of the following items for the years ended December 31:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax at statutory rates

 

$

430

 

34

$

112

 

34

%

Tax-exempt interest income

 

(206

)

(16

)

(101

)

(31

)

Life insurance income

 

(89

)

(7

)

(34

)

(10

)

Interest disallowance

 

20

 

1

 

10

 

3

 

Other

 

(2

)

 

(29

)

(9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Income Taxes (Benefit)

 

$

153

 

12

$

(42

)

(13

)%

 

Deferred income taxes result from income and expense items which are recognized for financial statement purposes in different reporting periods than for federal income tax purposes.  The current and deferred portions of applicable income taxes (benefit) for the years ended December 31 are as follows:

 

(In thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current tax

 

$

267

 

$

105

 

Deferred tax benefit

 

(114

)

(147

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicable Federal Income Tax (Benefit)

 

$

153

 

$

(42

)

 

The Corporation provides deferred taxes, at the 34% tax rate, on cumulative temporary differences. Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at December 31:

 

(In thousands)

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

793

 

$

665

 

Loans

 

36

 

5

 

Bank shares tax

 

41

 

 

Deferred directors’ fees

 

53

 

36

 

Deferred compensation

 

175

 

238

 

Purchase accounting adjustments

 

45

 

128

 

Alternative minimum tax

 

104

 

90

 

Other

 

30

 

5

 

 

 

1,277

 

1,167

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(356

)

(362

)

Unrealized gain on investment securities

 

(83

)

(19

)

 

 

(439

)

(381

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Deferred Tax Asset

 

$

838

 

$

786

 

 

66



Table of Contents

 

Note 10 — Taxes (Continued)

 

The Corporation has not recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets as management believes it is more likely than not that they will be ultimately realized.

 

The Corporation recorded a $287,000 net gain from the sale of available-for-sale securities during 2009, which was taxed at 34%, or $98,000.  This is in comparison with a $40,000 net gain from the sale of available-for-sale securities during 2008, which was taxed at 34%, or $14,000.

 

Uncertain Tax Position

 

The Corporation files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  With few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006.  The Corporation adopted the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes on January 1, 2009, with no impact on the financial statements.

 

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained.  The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period in which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any.  Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions.  Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above would be reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.  Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits would be classified as additional income taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  At December 31, 2009, there was no liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

 

Pennsylvania Corporate Tax Credit

 

In 2007, the Bank completed the construction of its new main office in Marysville.  As part of this project, the Bank applied for a $250,000 tax credit under the Pennsylvania Enterprise Zone Tax Credit Program which authorizes tax credits to private companies that make qualified investments in designated enterprise zones by rehabilitating, expanding or improving buildings within an enterprise zone.  The Bank recorded a $216,000 credit in 2007, representing the amount of costs management initially estimated it was eligible to receive as a tax credit and included it in Bank shares tax expense (credit) on the consolidated statement of income.  In July 2008, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue made a final determination that the Bank was entitled to the full $250,000 credit, and the additional $34,000 was recognized and used to offset the Bank’s 2008 Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax liability.  In 2009, the Bank recorded $257,000 in Bank share tax expense as compared with $104,000 recorded in 2008.

 

Note 11 - Borrowings

 

The Corporation has an unsecured line of credit agreement with Atlantic Central Bankers Bank in

 

67



Table of Contents

 

Note 11 - Borrowings (Continued)

 

the amount of $6,250,000 at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  Interest accrues based on the daily Federal Funds rate.  There were no amounts outstanding on this line of credit at December 31, 2009 or 2008.

 

Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the amount the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased for, plus accrued interest.  The Corporation requires investment securities to be held as collateral for the repurchase agreements.  The securities underlying the agreements were under the Corporation’s control.

 

The Corporation has entered into agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) which allow for borrowings up to a percentage of certain qualifying collateral assets.  At December 31, 2009, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity of approximately $88,968,000.  The borrowing capacity is collateralized by security agreements in certain residential real estate backed assets of the Corporation, including loans and investments.  Borrowings from the FHLB include long-term borrowing agreements which are subject to restrictions and penalties for early repayment under certain circumstances and borrowings under repurchase advance agreements.

 

A summary of short-term borrowings is as follows at December 31:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase agreements with customers

 

$

807

 

$

527

 

FHLB short-term borrowings

 

 

20,796

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

807

 

$

21,323

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average rate at end of year

 

0.54

%

0.54

%

Maximum amount outstanding at any end of month

 

$

28,902

 

$

21,323

 

Daily average amount outstanding

 

8,111

 

9,743

 

Approximate weighted average interest rate for year

 

0.60

%

1.56

%

 

FHLB borrowings under long-term arrangements are summarized as follows at December 31:

 

Maturity Date

 

Interest Rate

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

06/18/09

 

5.41

%

Fixed rate

 

$

 

$

5,000

 

06/18/12

 

2.24

 

Fixed rate

 

1,128

 

 

09/18/12

 

2.33

 

Fixed rate

 

2,000

 

 

06/18/13

 

2.67

 

Fixed rate

 

2,550

 

 

04/09/18

 

2.90

 

Fixed rate

 

5,019

 

5,033

 

 

 

 

 

until 04/09/11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

10,697

 

$

10,033

 

 

68



Table of Contents

 

Note 11 - Borrowings (Continued)

 

Scheduled contractual maturities of FHLB borrowings are as follows at December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

 

Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

$

3,128

 

2013

 

2,550

 

2018

 

5,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

10,697

 

 

Note 12 - Financial Instruments with Off Balance Sheet Risk

 

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments consist primarily of commitments to extend credit, typically residential mortgage loans and commercial loans and, to a lesser extent, standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet.

 

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.  The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on balance sheet instruments.  The Bank does not anticipate any material losses from those commitments.

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there are no violations of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extensions of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.  Collateral held varies but may include investments, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.  For loans secured by real estate, the Bank generally requires loan to value ratios of no greater than 80%.

 

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements and similar transactions.  The terms of the letters of credit vary and may have renewal features. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.  The Bank holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.  The current amount of the liability as of December 31, 2009 for guarantees under standby letters of credit is not material.

 

69



Table of Contents

 

Note 12 - Financial Instruments with Off Balance Sheet Risk (Continued)

 

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss for loan commitments (unfunded loans and unused lines of credit, including home equity lines of credit) and standby and performance letters of credit was as follows at December 31:

 

 

 

Contract or Notional Amount

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments to grant loans

 

$

8,549

 

$

6,428

 

Unfunded commitments of existing loans

 

10,331

 

10,334

 

Standby and performance letters of credit

 

1,111

 

1,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

19,991

 

$

17,825

 

 

Note 13 - Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

Substantially all of the Corporation’s business activity, including loans and loan commitments, is with customers located within its trade area of the counties of Perry, Cumberland and Dauphin, Pennsylvania.  The concentration of credit by type of loan is set forth in the Loans note to the financial statements.

 

Note 14 - Regulatory Matters and Shareholders’ Equity

 

Certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Corporation in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.  Regulatory approval is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds net profits (as defined) for that year combined with the retained net profits for the two preceding years.  At December 31, 2009, $609,000 of undistributed earnings of the Bank, included in consolidated shareholders’ equity, was available for distribution to the Corporation as dividends without prior regulatory approval.

 

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  Failure to meet the minimum regulatory capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation and the consolidated financial statements.  Under the regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The capital amounts and classification under the prompt corrective action guidelines are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors.

 

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of: total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and Tier 1 capital to average total assets (as defined).  Management believes, as of December 31, 2009, that the Bank meets all the capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

 

70



Table of Contents

 

Note 14 - Regulatory Matters and Shareholders’ Equity (Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2009 the Bank was categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  To remain categorized as well capitalized the Bank will have to maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the table below.  There are no conditions or events since that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

 

The Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule in 2006 that expands the definition of a small bank holding company (“BHC”) under the Board’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement and the Board’s risk-based and leverage capital guidelines for bank holding companies.  Based on the ruling, the Corporation meets the eligibility criteria of a small BHC and is exempt from regulatory requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.

 

The Bank’s actual capital ratios, at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the minimum ratios required for capital adequacy purposes and to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions are summarized below.

 

 

 

Actual

 

For Capital Adequacy
Purposes

 

To be Well Capitalized
under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions

 

 

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

24,513

 

15.5

$

³12,635

 

³8.0

$

>15,794

 

>10.0

%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

22,532

 

14.3

 

³6,317

 

³4.0

 

³9,476

 

³ 6.0

 

Tier 1 capital (to average total assets)

 

22,532

 

9.0

 

>10,036

 

>4.0

 

³12,545

 

³ 5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

23,442

 

14.3

$

³13,146

 

³8.0

$

>16,433

 

>10.0

%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

21,655

 

13.2

 

³6,573

 

³4.0

 

³9,860

 

³ 6.0

 

Tier 1 capital (to average total assets)

 

21,655

 

9.5

 

>9,150

 

>4.0

 

³11,437

 

³ 5.0

 

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

 

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments.  However, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique.  Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated.  The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates.  As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

 

71



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

In September 2006, a new accounting standard was released relating to Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  The standard establishes a fair value hierarchy regarding the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset.  The standard was effective for the Corporation as of January 1, 2008.  However, in February 2008 the effective date of this standard for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) was extended to the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The impact of this standard did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption on January 1, 2009.

 

In October 2008, a new accounting standard was issued related to Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset is Not Active to clarify the application of the provisions of Fair Value Measurements in an active market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market.  This standard was effective immediately and applied to the Corporation’s December 31, 2008 and later consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2009, a new accounting standard with regard to Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly was issued.  The standard for Fair Value Measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.  The new standard provides additional guidance for determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased.  The standard also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.  This standard also provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability.  When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements standard.  This standard clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly.  In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly.  The standard provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly.  A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.  This standard is effective for the Corporation for interim and annual reporting periods ending June 30, 2009 and after.  Adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

 

The Fair Value Measurements standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under this standard are as follows:

 

72



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

Level 1:                                                      Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2:                                                     Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

Level 3:                                                     Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

 

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had no liabilities subject to fair value reporting requirements.  For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at December 31 are as follows:

 

Description

 

Balance

 

(Level 1)
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

 

(Level 2)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

 

(Level 3)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for- sale

 

$

34,583

 

$

 

$

34,583

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for- sale

 

$

28,120

 

$

 

$

28,120

 

$

 

 

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

 

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Corporation to measure certain financial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements.

 

Loans Held for Sale

 

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.  These loans typically consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market.  Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2).  As such, the Corporation records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis.  The Corporation had no loans held for sale as of December 31, 2009 as compared with $1,124,000 in mortgage loans held for sale as of December 31, 2008, which were recorded at fair value.

 

73



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

Other Real Estate Owned

 

Certain assets such as other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at fair value of real estate acquired through foreclosure at an estimated fair value less cost to sell.  At or near the time of foreclosure, real estate appraisals are obtained on the properties acquired through foreclosure.  The real estate is then valued at the lesser of the appraised value or the loan balance, including interest receivable, at the time of foreclosure less an estimate of costs to sell the property.  Appraised values are typically determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Corporation using observable market data (Level 2).  However, if the acquired property is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered a Level 3.  The estimate of costs to sell the property is based on historical transactions of similar holdings.  The Corporation has OREO property valued at $312,000 (Level 2) at December 31, 2009.

 

Impaired Loans

 

ASC 820 applies to loans measured for impairment using the practical expedients permitted by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent).  Fair value of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of collateral.  The impairment of loans is measured based on the estimated value of underlying collateral if the loan.  The value of the collateral is typically determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Corporation using observable market data (Level 2).  However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3.  The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value of the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data.  Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3).  Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as a provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income.  The Corporation had impaired loans of $4,328,000 at December 31, 2009 out of which $3,550,000 required a valuation allowance of $1,047,000.  This compares with impaired loans of $3,203,000 at December 31, 2008, out of which $668,000 required a valuation allowance of $225,000.

 

Goodwill

 

The fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as goodwill recognized in a business combination and uses standard valuation methodologies.  Fair value may be determined using market prices, comparison to similar assets, market multiples, discounted cash flow analysis and other factors.  Estimated cash flows may extend far into the future and by their nature are difficult to determine over an extended time frame.  Factors that may significantly affect the estimates included specific industry or market sector conditions, changes in revenue growth trends, customer behavior, competitive forces, cost structures and changes in discount rates.  The Corporation did not incur goodwill impairment during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

74



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of Riverview’s assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.  The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost):

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

 

Interest-bearing time deposit (carried at cost):

Fair values for fixed-rate time certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.  The Corporation generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.

 

Securities:

The fair value of securities available-for-sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.  For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 3).  In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.  Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments.  Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) are used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments, if applicable.

 

Mortgage loans held for sale (carried at lower of cost or fair value):

The fair value of mortgages held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices.  If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of the loan is determined using quoted market prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

 

Loans (carried at cost):

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans.  Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal.  Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

 

75



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

Impaired loans (generally carried at fair value):

Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under the standard regarding Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, in which the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral.  Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds.  These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.  At December 31, 2009, the fair value consists of the loan balances of $3,550,000, net of a valuation allowance of $1,047,000.  Additional provisions for loan losses of $1,047,000 were recorded during the period.

 

Restricted investment in Bank stocks (carried at cost):

The carrying amount of restricted investment in Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

 

Accrued interest receivable and payable (carried at cost):

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

 

Deposit liabilities (carried at cost):

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts).  Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

 

Short-term borrowings (carried at cost):

The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

 

Long-term borrowings (carried at cost):

Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.  The prices were obtained from an active market and represent a fair value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

 

Off-balance sheet financial instruments (disclosed at cost):

Fair values for the Corporation’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

 

76



Table of Contents

 

Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)

 

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the following table:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

24,833

 

$

24,833

 

$

6,018

 

$

6,018

 

Interest-bearing time deposits

 

2,700

 

2,700

 

950

 

950

 

Investment securities

 

34,583

 

34,583

 

28,120

 

28,120

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

 

1,124

 

1,124

 

Loans, net

 

170,384

 

173,973

 

176,469

 

176,816

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

782

 

782

 

812

 

812

 

Restricted investments in bank stocks

 

2,410

 

2,410

 

2,075

 

2,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

214,936

 

211,249

 

174,353

 

175,173

 

Short-term borrowings

 

807

 

807

 

21,323

 

21,323

 

Long-term borrowings

 

10,697

 

10,180

 

10,033

 

10,137

 

Accrued interest payable

 

389

 

389

 

499

 

499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off balance sheet financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies

 

The Corporation is subject to numerous claims and lawsuits which arise primarily in the normal course of business.  At December 31, 2009, there were no such claims or lawsuits which, in the opinion of management, would have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation.

 

77



Table of Contents

 

Note 17 — Riverview Financial Corporation (Parent Company Only) Financial Information

 

Balance Sheets

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2

 

$

579

 

Investment in bank subsidiary

 

24,630

 

23,554

 

Real estate, net

 

72

 

72

 

Other assets

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

24,717

 

$

24,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

$

24,717

 

$

24,205

 

 

Statements of Income

 

 

 

Years Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income, dividends from bank subsidiary

 

$

160

 

$

700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income Before Equity in Undistributed (Distributions in Excess of) Net Income of Subsidiary

 

159

 

700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net income of subsidiary

 

952

 

(329

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

1,111

 

$

371

 

 

78



Table of Contents

 

Note 17 — Riverview Financial Corporation (Parent Company Only) Financial Information (Continued)

 

Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Years Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,111

 

$

371

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net income of subsidiary

 

(952

)

329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 

159

 

700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid

 

(736

)

(300

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

 

(736

)

(300

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(577

)

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning

 

579

 

179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending

 

$

2

 

$

579

 

 

Note 18 — Subsequent Events

 

The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2009 through March 24, 2010, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.  Based on the definitions and requirements of generally accepted accounting principles, we have identified one event that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2009 and through March 24, 2010 that requires disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.  On March 17, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the modification of the exercise price of the 170,000 options granted during 2009 to $13.00 from $16.00.  The Corporation did not incur any additional expense as a result of this change, nor were the Corporation’s financial statements impacted by this transaction.

 

79



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A (T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Riverview carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 as of December 31, 2009.  Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, Riverview’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to Riverview (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic SEC filings.

 

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in Riverview’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Riverview’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Riverview Financial Corporation Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

 

The Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the financial statements included in this annual report.  The financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

 

Management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.  The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits.  Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified.  Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.  Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

 

Management assessed the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on this assessment, management concludes that as of December 31, 2009, its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the “Internal Control — Integrated Framework”.

 

80



Table of Contents

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Corporation’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Corporation to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

 

/s/ Robert M. Garst

 

/s/ Theresa M. Wasko

Robert M. Garst

 

Theresa M. Wasko

Chief Executive Officer

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

 

None.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

 

Information about Directors

 

Information, as of December 31, 2009, concerning the three director nominees and the ten continuing directors comprising the Board of Directors is as follows:

 

81



Table of Contents

 

Name and Age

 

Director
Since(*)

 

Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years and
Positions Held with Riverview Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

Nominees:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James G. Ford, II, 62

 

2006

 

Mr. Ford is President of the J. LeRue Hess Agency, Inc. He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 2006. We believe Mr. Ford’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his 40 years of extensive sales and marketing experience in the insurance industry as well as his leadership as president of the company.

 

 

 

 

 

Robert M. Garst, 51

 

2008

 

Mr. Garst is Chief Executive Officer of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank. Prior to that Mr. Garst was Executive Vice President of First Perry and President of The First National Bank of Marysville from May 2006 to December 31, 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Garst was Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Pennsylvania State Bank. We believe Mr. Garst’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his vast banking knowledge and experience, his executive leadership skills and his expertise in organizing and developing corporate strategies.

 

 

 

 

 

Paul R. Reigle, 80

 

1995

 

Mr. Reigle is a retired banker. Mr. Reigle was Chairman of the Board of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Halifax National Bank since 1995. Mr. Reigle served as Cashier for Halifax National Bank from 1960 through 1990. We believe Mr. Reigle’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience in the banking industry, which exceeds 40 years, as well as his leadership role as the former Chairman of the Board of a bank holding company and bank.

 

 

 

 

 

Incumbent Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Roland R. Alexander, 60

 

2001

 

Dr. Alexander is a physician with and owner of East Shore Oncology, P.C., Harrisburg, PA. He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 2001. We believe Dr. Alexander’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his entrepreneurial experience and leadership in operating a local medical practice, his experience in public and federal grant administration and his nine years of experience as a Board member.

 

 

 

 

 

Arthur M. Feld, 67

 

1998

 

Mr. Feld is an Attorney-at-Law. He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 1998. We believe Mr. Feld’s qualifications to be on our Board of Directors include his extensive legal and business expertise and his 12 years of experience as a Board member.

 

82



Table of Contents

 

Name and Age

 

Director
Since(*)

 

Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years and
Positions Held with Riverview Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

Kirk D. Fox, 43

 

2007

 

Mr. Fox is President of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank. Mr. Fox was an Executive Vice President of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Chief Lending Officer of Halifax National Bank from August 2004 to December 31, 2008. Prior to that Mr. Fox was Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer for another bank, where he worked since 1988. He formerly served as a director of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Halifax National Bank since 2007. We believe Mr. Fox’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his vast banking knowledge and experience, leadership skills and his familiarity with the communities that the bank serves.

 

 

 

 

 

R. Keith Hite, 62

 

2006

 

Mr. Hite is a principal with Malady-Wooten, a Harrisburg based public affairs agency. He recently retired after 30 years as Executive Director of the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors. He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 2006. We believe Mr. Hite’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his executive leadership skills in managing a state association and his extensive knowledge of local markets served by the bank.

 

 

 

 

 

David W. Hoover, 49

 

2007

 

Mr. Hoover is President of Hoover Financial Services, Inc., located in Halifax, Pennsylvania. He formerly served as a director of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Halifax National Bank since 2007. We believe Mr. Hoover’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his leadership skills, financial expertise and his knowledge of the communities served by the bank.

 

 

 

 

 

William L. Hummel, 62

 

1983

 

Mr. Hummel is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of First Perry and Chief Executive Officer of The First National Bank of Marysville from April 1997 until December 31, 2008. He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 1983. We believe Mr. Hummel’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive banking experience, his knowledge of the communities the bank serves and his leadership role as the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the bank holding company and bank.

 

 

 

 

 

Joseph D. Kerwin, 46

 

2005

 

Mr. Kerwin is a partner and attorney with the law firm of Kerwin & Kerwin located in Elizabethville, Pennsylvania. He formerly served as a director of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Halifax National Bank since 2005. We believe Mr. Kerwin’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive legal and business expertise and his experience as a Board member.

 

 

 

 

 

James M. Lebo, 65

 

1996

 

Mr. Lebo is President of the Lebo Agency and is a licensed insurance agent. He formerly served as a director of HNB Bancorp, Inc. and Halifax National Bank since 1996. We believe Mr. Lebo’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience as a local businessman knowledgeable of local markets and his 14 years experience as a Board member.

 

83



Table of Contents

 

Name and Age

 

Director
Since(*)

 

Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years and
Positions Held with Riverview Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

John M. Schrantz, 59

 

1994

 

Mr. Schrantz is President of H.E. Rohrer, Inc. (Rohrer Bus Service). He formerly served as a director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since 1994. We believe Mr. Schrantz’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his financial expertise and leadership as president of a local company combined further enhanced by his knowledge of the communities served by the bank.

 

 

 

 

 

David A. Troutman, 53

 

2002

 

Mr. Troutman is President and owner of A.W. Troutman DBA/ Troutman’s Chevrolet — Buick - GMC, an automobile dealership in Millersburg, PA; owner of W.C. Troutman Company, a finance company in Millersburg, PA; and owner of Lykens Valley Golf Course in Millersburg, PA. He formerly served as a director of Halifax National Bank since 2002. We believe Mr. Troutman’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his business and entrepreneurial experience, his leadership in managing various enterprises and his knowledge of the people and communities served by the bank.

 


(*)  Includes service as director of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, The First National Bank of Marysville and HNB Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, Halifax National Bank.

 

Executive Officers

 

The following table provides information, as of March 18, 2009, about the Corporation’s executive officers.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Principal Occupation For the Past Five Years and Position
Held with Riverview Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

Robert M. Garst

 

51

 

Mr. Garst is Chief Executive Officer of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank. Prior to that Mr. Garst was Executive Vice President of First Perry and President of The First National Bank of Marysville from May 2006 to December 31, 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Garst was Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Pennsylvania State Bank.

 

 

 

 

 

Kirk D. Fox

 

43

 

Mr. Fox is President of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank. Mr. Fox was an Executive Vice President of HNB and Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Halifax National Bank from August 2004 until December 31, 2008. Prior to that Mr. Fox was Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer for another bank, where he worked since 1988. He has served as director of Halifax National Bank since 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

Theresa M. Wasko

 

57

 

Ms. Wasko is Chief Financial Officer of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank since January 2009. Prior to that Ms. Wasko served as Chief Financial Officer of Great Bear Bank (a bank in organization) from 2007 to 2009 and Chief Financial Officer of East Penn Bank from 1998 to 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

Paul B. Zwally

 

45

 

Mr. Zwally is an Executive Vice President and the Chief Lending Officer of Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank. Prior to that, Mr.  Zwally was a Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and The First National Bank of Marysville since March 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Zwally was a Vice President and commercial lending officer at PNC Bank and Community Bank since 1989.

 

84



Table of Contents

 

The Board of Directors of Riverview Financial Corporation has a separate Audit Committee comprised of independent directors.  The members of the Audit Committee are R. Keith Hite, Chairman, Arthur M. Feld and Joseph D. Kerwin.  While the Audit Committee is of the opinion that none of the individual committee members alone qualify as a “financial expert”, the committee further believes that the aggregate experience of the committee members as a whole provide the skills and understanding that meet the qualifications for a “financial expert”.

 

Riverview adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to directors, officers and employees of Riverview and the Riverview National Bank.  The Code of Ethics defines the standards of honesty, integrity, impartiality and conduct that are essential to ensure the proper performance of the bank’s business and to ensure the public’s trust.   The Code of Ethics was attached as Exhibit 14.1 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.  A copy of the full text of the Code of Ethics may be obtained by contacting Kandi Lopp, Riverview Financial Corporation, 3rd & Market Streets, Halifax, Pennsylvania 17032.

 

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to Riverview’s Board of Directors.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

Director Compensation

 

The following table sets forth the compensation received by directors of the corporation in 2009.

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash (1)
($)

 

Option
Awards
(2)
($)

 

All Other
Compensation

 

Total

 

Roland R. Alexander

 

$

15,000

 

$

4,945

 

$

 

$

19,945

 

Arthur M. Feld

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

James G. Ford, II

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

R. Keith Hite

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

David W. Hoover

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

William L. Hummel

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

146,929

(3)

166,874

 

Joseph D. Kerwin

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

James M. Lebo

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

Paul R. Reigle

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

John M. Schrantz

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

David A. Troutman

 

15,000

 

4,945

 

 

19,945

 

 


(1)  Retainer fee for services as a director.

(2)  During 2009, each director was granted 5,750 common stock options under the Corporation’s 2009 non-qualified Stock Option Plan at an exercise price of $16.00 per share.  The per share grant date fair market value under the accounting standard relating to Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation on the common stock option grants for the named executives was $0.86 per share.  Because the vesting schedule is a seven-year cliff, the options are not exercisable until 2016.

(3)  Includes salary of $40,000; bonus of $5,000; an automobile allowance of $2,072 for personal use; 401(k) match of $4,274; life insurance premiums of $194; profit sharing of $4,336; change of $21,150 in the pension value of supplemental retirement plan; $3,603 in payments under the supplemental retirement plan; and the first of two contractual severance payments for $66,300 related to consolidation activity.

 

85



Table of Contents

 

Executive Compensation

 

The following table summarizes the total compensation for 2009 and 2008 for Robert M. Garst, Riverview Financial Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Kirk D. Fox, Riverview Financial Corporation’s President, Theresa M. Wasko, Riverview Financial Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer and Paul B. Zwally, Riverview Financial Corporation’s Chief Lending Officer.  All compensation paid in 2008 to each executive officer was paid by either First Perry Bancorp, Inc. or HNB Bancorp, Inc. prior to their consolidation into Riverview Financial Corporation on December 31, 2008.  These individuals are referred to as the “Named Executive Officers.”

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal
Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Option
Awards
(1)
($)

 

All Other
Compensation

 

Total

 

Robert M. Garst,

Chief Executive Officer

 

2009

 

$

132,600

 

$

42,500

 

$

23,220

 

$

37,070

(2)

$

235,390

 

 

 

2008

 

132,600

 

30,000

 

 

73,444

(3)

236,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kirk D. Fox, President

 

2009

 

130,000

 

40,000

 

24,080

 

34,244

(4)

228,324

 

 

 

2008

 

105,000

 

30,000

 

 

74,019

(5)

209,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theresa M. Wasko,

Chief Financial Officer (6)

 

2009

 

110,769

 

12,500

 

12,900

 

10,194

(7)

146,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paul B. Zwally,

Chief Lending Officer

 

2009

 

118,450

 

37,000

 

14,405

 

20,622

(8)

190,477

 

 

 

2008

 

91,608

(9)

32,500

 

 

4,768

(10)

128,876

 

 


(1)     The per share grant date fair market value under the accounting standard relating to Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation on the common stock option grants for the named executives was $0.86 per share.  Because the vesting schedule is a seven-year cliff, the options are not exercisable until 2016.

(2)     Includes an automobile stipend of $6,000; 401(k) match of $5,555; life insurance premiums of $194; profit sharing of $10,320; and directors’ fees of $15,000.

(3)     Includes an automobile stipend of $6,000; 401(k) match of $3,210; life insurance premiums of $468; profit sharing of $13,766; and a one-time award for $50,000 in recognition of Mr. Garst’s extraordinary service related to consolidation activity.

(4)     Includes an automobile allowance for personal use of $480; 401(k) match of $5,205; life insurance premiums of $194; profit sharing of $8,749; change of $4,616 in pension value of supplemental retirement plan; and directors’ fees of $15,000.

(5)     Includes an automobile allowance for personal use of $560; 401(k) match of $3,150; life insurance premiums of $259; profit sharing of $5,038; change of $5,012 in pension value of supplemental retirement plan; and a one-time award for $60,000 in recognition of Mr. Fox’s extraordinary service related to consolidation activity.

(6)     There is nothing to report for 2008 since Mrs. Wasko was employed by Riverview National Bank January 2009

(7)     Includes life insurance premiums of $194; and a one-time sign-on bonus of $10,000.

(8)     Includes a country club allowance of $7,049; 401(k) match of $4,875; life insurance premiums of $194; and profit sharing of $8,504.

(9)     Mr. Zwally was employed by Riverview National Bank March 2008.

(10)   Includes a country club allowance of $4,534; and life insurance premiums of $234.

 

86



Table of Contents

 

Each of the named executive officers are respectively parties to either a one-year or three-year term rolling employment agreement with Riverview Financial Corporation and Riverview National Bank, wherein on every anniversary date of the agreement, the agreement will be extended for another year unless notice of nonrenewal is given.  The agreements provide that the executives may participate in those employee benefit plans in which they are eligible.  It also provides that if the executives are terminated without cause or if after a change in control there is a reduction in salaries or benefits, or a change in their reporting responsibilities, duties or titles, the following will occur:

 

·                  Messrs Garst and Fox will receive three times their Annual Compensation as defined in the agreement in 24 monthly installments.  The executives will receive a continuation of all non-cash benefits for three years.

 

·                  Mrs. Wasko will receive one times her annual base salary, payable in 12 equal monthly installments.  She will also be reimbursed for the monthly premium paid to obtain substantially similar employee benefits for 12 months following the date of termination.

 

·                  Mr. Zwally will receive one times his Annual Compensation as defined in the agreement in 24 monthly installments.  He will also receive a continuation of all non-cash benefits for one year.

 

If the payments are determined to be parachute payments and the executives are subject to excise taxes, they will receive an additional cash payment in an amount such that the after-tax proceeds of such payment will be equal to the amount of the excise tax.

 

2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

In January 2009 the Corporation implemented a nonqualified stock option plan.  The purpose of the 2009 Stock Option Plan was to advance the development, growth and financial condition of the Corporation by providing incentives through participation in the appreciation of the common stock of the Corporation to secure, retain and motivate the Corporation’s directors, officers and key employees and to align such person’s interests with those of the Corporation’s shareholders.  Shares of the Corporation’s common stock that may be issued or transferred under this plan shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 170,000 shares at a purchase price of $16.00 per share.  The vesting schedule is a seven year cliff, which means that the options are 100% vested in the seventh year following the grant date and the expiration date is ten years following the grant date.

 

87



Table of Contents

 

The following table represents each stock option grant awarded to the named executive officer in 2009 and their total value calculated in accordance with the accounting standard relating to Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.  In addition, the information presented also represents the stock options outstanding for each named executive as of December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

Grant
Date

(1)

 

All Other
Option
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Share)

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards

($)

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Robert M. Garst

 

1/21/2009

 

25,000

 

$

16.00

 

$

21,500

 

1/21/2019

 

 

 

9/16/2009

 

2,000

 

$

16.00

 

1,720

 

9/16/2019

 

Kirk D. Fox

 

1/21/2009

 

25,000

 

$

16.00

 

21,500

 

1/21/2019

 

 

 

9/16/2009

 

3,000

 

$

16.00

 

2,580

 

9/16/2019

 

Theresa M. Wasko

 

1/21/2009

 

10,000

 

$

16.00

 

8,600

 

1/21/2019

 

 

 

9/16/2009

 

5,000

 

$

16.00

 

4,300

 

9/16/2019

 

Paul B. Zwally

 

1/21/2009

 

15,000

 

$

16.00

 

12,900

 

1/21/2019

 

 

 

9/16/2009

 

1,750

 

$

16.00

 

1,505

 

9/16/2019

 

 


(1)  The per share grant date fair market value under the accounting standard relating to Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation on the stock option grants for the named executives was $0.86.

 

As of December 31, 2009 none of the options were vested or exercisable.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

 

Principal Holders

 

The following table shows, to the best of our knowledge, those persons or entities who owned of record or beneficially, on December 31, 2009, more than 5% of the outstanding Riverview Financial Corporation common stock.

 

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership

 

Percent of Class

 

Arlene G. Deckard

c/o First National Bank of Marysville

101 Lincoln Street, PO Box B

Marysville, PA 17053-1314

 

108,601

 

6.21

%

 

Beneficial Ownership of Executive Officers, Directors and Nominees

 

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2009, the amount and percentage of Riverview Financial Corporation common stock beneficially owned by each director, each nominee, each named executive officer and all directors, nominees and executive officers of the Corporation as a group.

 

Beneficial ownership of shares of Riverview Financial Corporation common stock is determined in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13d-3, which provides

 

88



Table of Contents

 

that a person should be credited with the ownership of any stock held, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares:

 

·                  Voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the stock; or

·                  Investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of the stock; or

·                  The right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after December 31, 2009.

 

Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote appearing below the table, all shares reported in the table below are owned directly by the reporting person.  The number of shares owned by the directors, nominees and executive officers is rounded to the nearest whole share.  The percentage of all Riverview Financial Corporation common stock owned by each individual director, nominee or executive officer is less than 1.18%.

 

Name of Individual or Identity of Group

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

 

Percent of Class

 

Directors and Nominees

 

 

 

 

 

Roland R. Alexander

 

20,500

 

1.17

%

Arthur M. Feld

 

14,100

 

0.81

%

James G. Ford, II

 

9,925

 

0.57

%

Kirk D. Fox

 

660

 

0.04

%

Robert M. Garst

 

1,217

 

0.07

%

R. Keith Hite

 

18,100

 

1.03

%

David W. Hoover

 

9,630

 

0.55

%

William L. Hummel

 

11,444

 

0.65

%

Joseph D. Kerwin

 

12,140

 

0.69

%

James M. Lebo

 

3,525

 

0.20

%

Paul R. Reigle

 

15,120

 

0.86

%

John M. Schrantz

 

13,510

 

0.77

%

David A. Troutman

 

15,930

 

0.91

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

 

Paul B. Zwally

 

100

 

0.01

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

 

145,901

 

8.34

%

 

Information about Riverview’s Equity Compensation Plans can be found in Part II, Item 7 under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

89



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

 

Currently, the Board of Directors has thirteen members.  Under the Nasdaq Stock Market standards for independence, the following ten directors meet the standards for independence:  Messrs. Alexander, Feld, Ford, Hite, Hoover, Kerwin, Lebo, Reigle, Schrantz and Troutman. This constitutes more than a majority of our Board of Directors.  Only independent directors serve on our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

In determining the directors’ independence, the Board of Directors considered loan transactions between Riverview National Bank and the directors, their family members and businesses with whom they are associated, as well as any contributions made to non-profit organizations with whom they are associated.

 

The table below includes a description of other categories or types of transactions, relationships or arrangements considered by the Board (in addition to those listed above and under the section entitled “Transactions with Directors and Executive Officers” below) in reaching its determination that the directors are independent.

 

Name

 

Independent

 

Other Transactions/Relationships/Arrangements

Mr. Alexander

 

Yes

 

None

Mr. Feld

 

Yes

 

Legal services — collection work

Mr. Ford

 

Yes

 

Insurance consulting

Mr. Hite

 

Yes

 

None

Mr. Hoover

 

Yes

 

Payroll processing services

Mr. Kerwin

 

Yes

 

Legal services — contracts

Mr. Lebo

 

Yes

 

Insurance consulting

Mr. Reigle

 

Yes

 

None

Mr. Schrantz

 

Yes

 

None

Mr. Troutman

 

Yes

 

None

 

In each case, the Board determined that none of the transactions above impaired the independence of the director.

 

Some of Riverview Financial Corporation’s directors and executive officers and the companies with which they are associated were customers of, and had banking transactions with, Riverview Financial Corporation’s subsidiary bank, Riverview National Bank or predecessor banks, The First National Bank of Marysville and Halifax National Bank, during 2009.  All loans and loan commitments made to them and to their companies were made in the ordinary course of bank business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and repayment terms, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers of the bank, and did not involve more than a normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.  Riverview Financial Corporation’s subsidiary bank anticipates that they will enter into similar transactions in the future.

 

The Board of Directors must approve all related party transactions that are significant.  The director in question is excused from the board meeting at the time the decision is made.

 

90



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

 

Prior to the formation of Riverview Financial Corporation on December 31, 2008, Beard Miller Company LLP, now known as ParenteBeard LLC, was the independent registered public accounting firm for First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and HNB Bancorp, Inc., individually.  On August 19, 2009, the Board of Directors approved the dismissal of ParenteBeard LLC as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm and approved the engagement of Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC as the Corporation’s new independent registered public accounting firm.  Riverview Financial Corporation notified ParenteBeard LLC of the dismissal on August 20, 2009.

 

The report issued by ParenteBeard LLC in connection with the audit of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

 

There were no disagreements with ParenteBeard LLC on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of ParenteBeard LLC would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreement in connection with its audited report or interim financial statements.

 

There were no reportable events within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K during the two most recent fiscal years or the subsequent interim period.

 

Aggregate fees billed by Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC, the independent registered public accounting firm for Riverview, for services rendered in the aggregate for the year ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:

 

 

 

2009

 

Audit fees(1)

 

$

46,008

 

Audit-related fees(2)

 

 

Tax fees(3)

 

2,750

 

All other fees(4)

 

 

Total

 

$

48,758

 

 


(1)                                Audit fees include professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of the corporation, quarterly review of the financial statements included in the corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, consents and other assistance required to complete the year-end audit of the consolidated financial statements, including review of the corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, and review and consents of documents filed with the SEC, including out-of-pocket expenses.

 

(2)                                Audit-related fees include reviews, analysis and consultations in regard to certain accounting transactions.

 

(3)                                Tax fees include fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

 

(4)                                All other fees include fees billed for products and services provided that are other than the services reported under the Audit fees, Audit-related and Tax fees sections of the table above..

 

91



Table of Contents

 

Aggregate fees billed by ParenteBeard LLC, the independent registered public accounting firm for Riverview, for services rendered in the aggregate for a portion of 2009 and the 2008 year end were as follows:

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

Audit fees(1)

 

$

13,201

 

$

241,823

 

Audit-related fees(2)

 

 

6,238

 

Tax fees(3)

 

 

2,845

 

All other fees(4)

 

2,700

 

 

Total

 

$

15,901

 

$

250,906

 

 


(1)                                Includes professional services rendered for the audit of Riverview’s 2008 consolidated financial statements and First Perry Bancorp, Inc. and HNB Bancorp, Inc.’s 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in Forms 10-Q, and procedures associated with registration statement on Form S-4, including out-of-pocket expenses.  Fees in 2009 are limited to Form 10-Q.

 

(2)                                Includes certain review, analysis and consultations in regard to certain accounting transactions.

 

(3)                                Includes review, analysis and consultations in regard to 280G compliance.

 

(4)                                Includes procedures in connection with transitioning to a new independent registered accounting firm.

 

The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.  These services may include audit services, audit related services, tax services and other services.  The Audit Committee pre-approval process is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget.  In addition, the Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case by case basis.  For each proposed service, the independent auditor is required to provide detailed back-up documentation at the time of approval.

 

Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC has been selected by the Board of Directors as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2010.

 

Representatives of Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC are expected to be present at the annual meeting. While the representatives will not have an opportunity to make a statement, the representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

(a)                                  1.                                       Financial statements are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8 hereof.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

92



Table of Contents

 

2.                                       The financial statement schedules, required by Regulation S-X, are omitted because the information is either not applicable or is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements.

 

3.                                       The following Exhibits are filed as part of this filing on Form 10-K, or incorporated by reference hereto:

3(i)                             The Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation.  (Incorporated by reference to Annex B included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-153486) filed November 4, 2008).

 

3(ii)                          The Registrant’s By-laws.  (Incorporated by reference to Annex C included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-153486) filed November 4, 2008).

 

10.1                         Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Robert M. Garst. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.2                         Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Kirk D. Fox.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.3                         Employment Agreement of Theresa M. Wasko. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.4                         Executive Employment Agreement of Paul B. Zwally.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.5                         Employment Agreement of William L. Hummel.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.6                         Acknowledgement and Release Agreement of William L. Hummel.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.7                         Form of Director Deferred Fee Agreements with Directors Roland R. Alexander, Robert M. Garst and Kirk D. Fox.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

93



Table of Contents

 

10.8                         2009 Stock Option Plan.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.9                         Release Agreement of Thomas N. Wasson.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2009.)

 

10.10                   Consulting Agreement of Thomas N. Wasson.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2009.)

 

10.11                   Second Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement Plan Agreement for Kirk D. Fox dated March 29, 2007, amended June 18, 2008 and entered into between Kirk D. Fox and Riverview National Bank on September 2, 2009.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11of Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2009.)

 

14.1                         Code of Ethics.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

21                                  Subsidiaries of Registrant.

 

31.1                         Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

 

31.2                         Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

 

32.1                         Chief Executive Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

 

32.2                         Chief Financial Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

 

94



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

By:

/s/ Robert M. Garst

 

 

Robert M. Garst

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 24, 2010

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Theresa M. Wasko

 

 

Theresa M. Wasko

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 24, 2010

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

 

 

DATE

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Robert M. Garst

 

March 24, 2010

 

Robert M. Garst

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Theresa M. Wasko

 

March 24, 2010

 

Theresa M. Wasko

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Roland R. Alexander

 

March 24, 2010

 

Roland R. Alexander, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Arthur M. Feld

 

March 24, 2010

 

Arthur M. Feld, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ James G. Ford, II

 

March 24, 2010

 

James G. Ford, II, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Kirk D. Fox

 

March 24, 2010

 

Kirk D. Fox, President & Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ R. Keith Hite

 

March 24, 2010

 

R. Keith Hite, Director

 

 

 

95



Table of Contents

 

By:

/s/ David W. Hoover

 

March 24, 2010

 

David W. Hoover, Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

and Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ William L. Hummel

 

March 24, 2010

 

William L. Hummel, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Joseph D. Kerwin

 

March 24, 2010

 

Joseph D. Kerwin, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ James M. Lebo

 

March 24, 2010

 

James M. Lebo, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Paul R. Reigle

 

March 24, 2010

 

Paul R. Reigle, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ John M. Schrantz

 

March 24, 2010

 

John M. Schrantz, Vice Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

and Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ David A. Troutman

 

March 24, 2010

 

David A. Troutman, Director

 

 

 

96



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

3(i)                             The Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation.  (Incorporated by reference to Annex B included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-153486) filed November 4, 2008).

 

3(ii)                          The Registrant’s By-laws.  (Incorporated by reference to Annex C included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-153486) filed November 4, 2008).

 

10.1                         Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Robert M. Garst. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.2                         Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Kirk D. Fox.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.3                         Employment Agreement of Theresa M. Wasko. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.4                         Executive Employment Agreement of Paul B. Zwally.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.5                         Employment Agreement of William L. Hummel.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.6                         Acknowledgement and Release Agreement of William L. Hummel.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.7                         Form of Director Deferred Fee Agreements with Directors Roland R. Alexander, Robert M. Garst and Kirk D. Fox.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

10.8                         2009 Stock Option Plan.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

97



Table of Contents

 

10.9                         Release Agreement of Thomas N. Wasson.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2009.)

 

10.10                   Consulting Agreement of Thomas N. Wasson.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2009.)

 

10.11                   Second Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement Plan Agreement for Kirk D. Fox dated March 29, 2007, amended June 18, 2008 and entered into between Kirk D. Fox and Riverview National Bank on September 2, 2009.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11of Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2009.)

 

14.1                         Code of Ethics.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.)

 

21                                  Subsidiaries of Registrant.

 

31.1                         Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

 

31.2                         Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

 

32.1                         Chief Executive Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

 

32.2                         Chief Financial Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

 

98