Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. | l39223exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. | l39223exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. | l39223exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. | l39223exv32w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended February 28, 2010 | File Number 001-13651 |
Robbins & Myers, Inc.
Ohio | 31-0424220 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
51 Plum Street, Suite 260, Dayton, Ohio | 45440 | |
(Address of Principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(937) 458-6600
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Common shares, without par value, outstanding as of February 28, 2010: 32,936,087
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
February 28, | August 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 132,420 | $ | 108,169 | ||||
Accounts receivable |
104,655 | 114,191 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Finished products |
33,456 | 33,034 | ||||||
Work in process |
39,708 | 37,984 | ||||||
Raw materials |
30,765 | 34,754 | ||||||
103,929 | 105,772 | |||||||
Other current assets |
14,619 | 11,573 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
11,304 | 12,519 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
366,927 | 352,224 | ||||||
Goodwill |
265,212 | 267,687 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets |
4,525 | 5,789 | ||||||
Deferred Taxes |
25,698 | 26,477 | ||||||
Other Assets |
8,985 | 9,490 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment |
303,082 | 303,448 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(175,116 | ) | (168,261 | ) | ||||
127,966 | 135,187 | |||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 799,313 | $ | 796,854 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 46,658 | $ | 55,918 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
77,054 | 68,059 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
30,853 | 30,194 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
154,565 | 154,171 | ||||||
Long-Term DebtLess Current Portion |
176 | 265 | ||||||
Deferred Taxes |
44,106 | 44,194 | ||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
114,411 | 115,113 | ||||||
Robbins & Myers, Inc. Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
152,160 | 150,344 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
352,040 | 344,530 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(32,179 | ) | (25,923 | ) | ||||
Total Robbins & Myers, Inc. Shareholders Equity |
472,021 | 468,951 | ||||||
Noncontrolling Interest |
14,034 | 14,160 | ||||||
Total Equity |
486,055 | 483,111 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 799,313 | $ | 796,854 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
2
Table of Contents
ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 129,919 | $ | 163,825 | $ | 259,332 | $ | 341,796 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
87,989 | 107,049 | 174,368 | 217,044 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
41,930 | 56,776 | 84,964 | 124,752 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
35,384 | 35,941 | 68,682 | 77,523 | ||||||||||||
Income before interest and income taxes |
6,546 | 20,835 | 16,282 | 47,229 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
161 | 90 | 304 | 143 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
6,385 | 20,745 | 15,978 | 47,086 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,932 | 5,290 | 5,299 | 14,247 | ||||||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
4,453 | 15,455 | 10,679 | 32,839 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
260 | 392 | 456 | 568 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Robbins & Myers, Inc. |
$ | 4,193 | $ | 15,063 | $ | 10,223 | $ | 32,271 | ||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
32,927 | 32,802 | 32,899 | 33,620 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
32,966 | 32,804 | 32,949 | 33,679 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Declared |
$ | 0.0425 | $ | 0.0400 | $ | 0.0825 | $ | 0.0775 | ||||||||
Paid |
$ | 0.0425 | $ | 0.0400 | $ | 0.0825 | $ | 0.0775 | ||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
February 28, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 10,679 | $ | 32,839 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
7,884 | 7,500 | ||||||
Amortization |
341 | 648 | ||||||
Net gain on asset sales |
(547 | ) | 0 | |||||
Stock compensation expense |
1,451 | 1,758 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
8,759 | 10,387 | ||||||
Inventories |
876 | (17,289 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(8,969 | ) | (17,650 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
8,070 | (14,197 | ) | |||||
Other |
959 | 929 | ||||||
Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Provided by Operating Activities |
29,503 | 4,925 | ||||||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures, net of nominal disposals |
(3,447 | ) | (7,044 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from asset sales |
1,094 | 0 | ||||||
Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Used by Investing Activities |
(2,353 | ) | (7,044 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from debt borrowings |
4,200 | 2,590 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(3,630 | ) | (4,785 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, including stock tax benefits |
366 | 859 | ||||||
Share buyback program |
0 | (39,114 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends paid |
(2,713 | ) | (2,616 | ) | ||||
Net Cash and Cash Equivalents Used by Financing Activities |
(1,777 | ) | (43,066 | ) | ||||
Exchange Rate Impact on Cash |
(1,122 | ) | (6,095 | ) | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
24,251 | (51,280 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
108,169 | 123,405 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
$ | 132,420 | $ | 72,125 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
February 28, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
February 28, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1Preparation of Financial Statements
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and subsidiaries (Company, we, our or us) contain all
adjustments, consisting of normally recurring items, necessary to present fairly our financial
condition as of February 28, 2010, and August 31, 2009, and the results of our operations for the
three and six month periods ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows for the six month
periods ended February 28, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we realigned our business segment reporting
structure as a result of organizational, management and operational changes implemented in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our Chemineer brand is now included in our Fluid Management segment,
instead of the Process Solutions segment where it was previously reported. The Fluid Management
segment is now comprised of R&M Energy Systems, Moyno, Chemineer and Tarby brands. The Process
Solutions segment is now comprised of Pfaudler, Tycon-Technoglass, and Edlon brands. The Romaco
segment is unchanged and includes Noack, Siebler, FrymaKoruma, Macofar and Promatic brands. All
intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Our Company has a Venezuelan subsidiary with net sales, operating income and total assets
representing approximately one percent of our consolidated financial statement amounts for fiscal
2009. Regulations in Venezuela require the purchase and sale of foreign currency to be made at an
official rate of exchange that is fixed from time to time by the Venezuelan government. We have
historically used the official exchange rate to translate the financial statements of our
Venezuelan subsidiary. The official exchange rate in Venezuela had been fixed at 2.15 bolivar
fuerte (VEF) to each U.S. Dollar for several years, despite significant inflation. In early
January 2010, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange
structure. The official exchange rate has been devalued from 2.15 VEF to each U.S. Dollar to 4.30
for non-essential goods and services and to 2.60 for essential goods. We expect our operations to
fall into the essential classification. As a result of this devaluation, we translated our
Venezuelan subsidiarys financial statements at the official rate for essential goods of 2.60 VEF
to each U.S. Dollar effective as of our second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The Venezuelan three year cumulative inflation rate exceeded 100 percent as of the beginning of our
second quarter of fiscal 2010. As a result, the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary
were consolidated and reported under highly inflationary accounting rules in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 and we recorded an income statement exchange loss of $0.6 million. Under highly
inflationary accounting, the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary are remeasured into
our Companys reporting currency (U.S. Dollars) and exchange gains and losses from this
remeasurement are reflected in current earnings, rather than accumulated other comprehensive income
on the balance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer considered highly inflationary.
If we are unsuccessful in sustaining the essential goods exchange rate of 2.60 VEF to each U.S.
Dollar, we could incur an additional income statement loss; however we do not expect that impact to
be material to our financial statements.
While we believe that the disclosures are adequately presented, it is suggested that these
consolidated condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2009. A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented therein on
page 30. There have been no material changes in the accounting policies followed by us during
fiscal year 2010 other than the adoption of a new accounting standard related to noncontrolling
interests in consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts presented in the prior period
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to our current year presentation and to
reflect the segment realignment discussed above.
5
Table of Contents
NOTE 2Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As discussed in Note 1 above, the Company made certain changes to its business segments effective
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This resulted in a $45.0 million reclassification of goodwill
from the Process Solutions segment to the Fluid Management segment. Changes in the carrying amount
of goodwill for the six month period ended February 28, 2010, by operating segment, are as follows:
Process | Fluid | |||||||||||||||
Solutions | Mgmt. | Romaco | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Segment | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 1, 2009 |
$ | 149,578 | $ | 106,189 | $ | 11,920 | $ | 267,687 | ||||||||
Chemineer goodwill reclassification |
(45,000 | ) | 45,000 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
Translation adjustments |
(1,852 | ) | (37 | ) | (586 | ) | (2,475 | ) | ||||||||
Balance as of February 28, 2010 |
$ | 102,726 | $ | 151,152 | $ | 11,334 | $ | 265,212 | ||||||||
Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows:
As of February 28, 2010 | As of August 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Net | Amount | Amortization | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents and
Trademarks |
$ | 11,285 | $ | 8,336 | $ | 2,949 | $ | 11,661 | $ | 8,138 | $ | 3,523 | ||||||||||||
Non-compete
Agreements |
8,860 | 7,705 | 1,155 | 8,998 | 7,622 | 1,376 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing
Costs |
9,602 | 9,181 | 421 | 9,631 | 9,145 | 486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
5,221 | 5,221 | 0 | 5,601 | 5,197 | 404 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,968 | $ | 30,443 | $ | 4,525 | $ | 35,891 | $ | 30,102 | $ | 5,789 | ||||||||||||
The amortization expense for the three and six month periods ended February 28, 2010 was $119,000
and $341,000 respectively. We estimate that the amortization expense will be approximately $400,000
for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and $800,000 for each of the next five years beginning fiscal
2011. The expected amortization expense is an estimate. Actual amounts of amortization expense may
differ from the estimated amounts due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, impairment of
intangible assets, intangible asset acquisitions, accelerated amortization of intangible assets and
other events.
6
Table of Contents
NOTE 3Net Income per Share
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Robbins & Myers, Inc. |
$ | 4,193 | $ | 15,063 | $ | 10,223 | $ | 32,271 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares |
32,927 | 32,802 | 32,899 | 33,620 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive options and restricted
shares/units |
39 | 2 | 50 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares |
32,966 | 32,804 | 32,949 | 33,679 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
For the three and six month periods ended February 28, 2010, 361,000 of stock options outstanding
were antidilutive and excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share. For the same
periods in the prior year, 266,000 of stock options outstanding were antidilutive and excluded from
the computation of diluted net income per share.
NOTE 4Product Warranties
Warranty obligations are contingent upon product failure rates, material required for the repairs
and service delivery costs. We estimate the warranty accrual based on specific product failures
that are known to us plus an additional amount based on the historical relationship of warranty
claims to sales.
Changes in our product warranty liability during the period are as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||
February 28, 2010 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
$ | 7,221 | ||
Warranty expense |
1,453 | |||
Deductions/payments |
(1,537 | ) | ||
Translation adjustment impact |
(50 | ) | ||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | 7,087 | ||
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 5Long-Term Debt
February 28, 2010 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Senior debt: |
||||
Revolving credit loan |
$ | 0 | ||
Senior notes |
30,000 | |||
Other |
1,029 | |||
Total debt |
31,029 | |||
Less current portion |
30,853 | |||
Long-term debt |
$ | 176 | ||
Our Bank Credit Agreement (Agreement) provides that we may borrow on a revolving credit basis up
to a maximum of $150,000,000 and includes a $100,000,000 expansion feature. All outstanding
amounts under the Agreement are due and payable on December 19, 2011. Interest is variable based
upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the Agreement, at our option,
and is payable quarterly. Indebtedness under the Agreement and the Senior Notes, discussed below,
is unsecured except for the pledge of the stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and approximately
two-thirds of the stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. We have $27,140,000 of standby letters
of credit outstanding at February 28, 2010. These standby letters of credit are used as security
for advance payments received from customers and for future payments to our vendors. Accordingly,
under the Agreement we have $122,860,000 of unused borrowing capacity.
We have $30,000,000 of Senior Notes (Senior Notes) outstanding with an interest rate of 6.84%,
due May 3, 2010, and therefore are classified as a current liability at February 28, 2010.
The Agreement and Senior Notes contain certain restrictive covenants including limitations on
indebtedness, asset sales, sales and lease backs, and cash dividends as well as financial covenants
relating to interest coverage, leverage and net worth. As of February 28, 2010, we are in
compliance with these covenants.
8
Table of Contents
NOTE 6 Retirement Benefits
Retirement and other postretirement plan costs are as follows:
Pension Benefits
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 681 | $ | 626 | $ | 1,373 | $ | 1,268 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
2,429 | 2,568 | 4,899 | 5,198 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(1,678 | ) | (2,069 | ) | (3,370 | ) | (4,200 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of transition (asset)/obligation |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (17 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
183 | 188 | 365 | 376 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized losses |
799 | 150 | 1,596 | 298 | ||||||||||||
Settlement expense |
0 | 113 | 0 | 226 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 2,406 | $ | 1,568 | $ | 4,846 | $ | 3,150 | ||||||||
Other Postretirement Benefits
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 155 | $ | 121 | $ | 310 | $ | 242 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
345 | 449 | 690 | 898 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
53 | 53 | 106 | 106 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized losses |
72 | 175 | 144 | 350 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 625 | $ | 798 | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,596 | ||||||||
NOTE 7Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was 30.3% for the second quarter and 33.2% for the year to date period of
fiscal 2010. The second quarter fiscal 2010 effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax
rate primarily due to statute lapses and audit settlements for items previously reserved of $0.8
million.
The effective tax rate was 25.5% for the second quarter and 30.3% for the year to date period of
fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate in fiscal 2009 was lower than the statutory tax rate due to
repatriation of a portion of the earnings of certain international subsidiaries, which resulted in
an overall lower effective tax rate.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties, as of February 28, 2010
and August 31, 2009 was $6.2 million, all of which would affect the effective tax rate if
recognized in future periods.
We do not anticipate a significant change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within the
next 12 months.
9
Table of Contents
NOTE 8Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to comprehensive (loss) income:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 4,453 | $ | 15,455 | $ | 10,679 | $ | 32,839 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(15,054 | ) | (12,110 | ) | (5,545 | ) | (55,203 | ) | ||||||||
Minimum pension liability
adjustment, net of tax |
(675 | ) | 0 | (675 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
(11,276 | ) | 3,345 | 4,459 | (22,364 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
48 | (166 | ) | (492 | ) | 412 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to
Robbins & Myers, Inc. |
$ | (11,228 | ) | $ | 3,179 | $ | 3,967 | $ | (21,952 | ) | ||||||
NOTE 9Stock Compensation
We sponsor a long-term incentive stock plan to provide for the granting of stock-based compensation
to certain officers and other key employees. Under the plan, the stock option price per share may
not be less than the fair market value per share as of the date of grant. Outstanding grants become
exercisable over a three-year period. In addition, we sponsor a long term incentive plan for
selected participants who earn performance share awards on varying target levels, based on earnings
per share and return on net assets. As of February 28, 2010, we had $3,917,000 of compensation
expense not yet recognized related to nonvested stock awards. The weighted average period that
this compensation cost will be recognized is 21 months. There were no stock options exercised in
the first six months of fiscal 2010 and 13,000 shares were exercised in the same period of the
prior year.
Total stock compensation expense for all stock based awards for the first six months of fiscal 2010
and 2009 was $1,451,000 ($943,000 after tax) and $1,758,000 ($1,143,000 after tax), respectively.
10
Table of Contents
NOTE 10Business Segments
The following tables present information about our reportable business segments. As discussed in
Note 1 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, effective in the first quarter of fiscal
2010, the Company realigned its business segment reporting structure as a result of organizational,
management and operational changes. Our Chemineer brand is now included in our Fluid Management
segment, instead of the Process Solutions segment where it was previously reported. The financial
information presented herein reflects the impact of this change for all periods presented.
Inter-segment sales were not material and were eliminated at the consolidated level.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated Customer Sales: | ||||||||||||||||
Fluid Management |
$ | 66,970 | $ | 86,871 | $ | 135,158 | $ | 187,401 | ||||||||
Process Solutions |
39,867 | 48,503 | 83,400 | 102,527 | ||||||||||||
Romaco |
23,082 | 28,451 | 40,774 | 51,868 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 129,919 | $ | 163,825 | $ | 259,332 | $ | 341,796 | ||||||||
Income Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT): | ||||||||||||||||
Fluid Management |
$ | 13,633 | $ | 22,283 | $ | 30,367 | $ | 50,507 | ||||||||
Process Solutions |
(2,538 | ) | 1,937 | (4,189 | ) | 5,222 | ||||||||||
Romaco |
340 | 442 | (418 | ) | (1,001 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate and
Eliminations |
(4,889 | ) | (3,827 | ) | (9,478 | ) | (7,499 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,546 | $ | 20,835 | $ | 16,282 | $ | 47,229 | ||||||||
February 28, | August 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Identifiable Assets: |
||||||||
Fluid Management |
$ | 318,859 | $ | 327,491 | ||||
Process Solutions |
252,205 | 269,146 | ||||||
Romaco |
90,888 | 98,335 | ||||||
Corporate and
Eliminations |
137,361 | 101,882 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 799,313 | $ | 796,854 | ||||
NOTE 11 Share Repurchase Program
On October 27, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
3.0 million of our currently outstanding common shares (the Program). Repurchases under the
Program have and will generally be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions
not exceeding prevailing market prices, subject to regulatory considerations and market conditions,
and have and will be funded from the Companys available cash and credit facilities. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, we acquired approximately 2.0 million of our outstanding common shares for
$39.1 million under the Program and were accounted for as treasury shares.
11
Table of Contents
NOTE 12 New Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a standard that established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) which amended the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) such that the ASC became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The
ASC did not change current U.S. GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.
All previously existing accounting standard documents were superseded and all other accounting
literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New accounting standards issued
subsequent to June 30, 2009 are communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards Updates. The
ASC was effective for the Company on September 1, 2009. This standard did not have an impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued an accounting standard codified in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. This standard established a single definition of fair value and
framework for measuring fair value, set out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the
source of information used in fair value measurements, and required disclosures of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value based on their level of hierarchy. We adopted this standard as
amended on September 1, 2008 on a prospective basis. An amendment to ASC 820 deferred the elective
date for one year with respect to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value but are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. We adopted the
amendment to the fair value measuring standard prospectively on September 1, 2009 (see Note 13).
In December 2007, the FASB issued and, in April 2009, amended a new business combination standard
codified within ASC 805, which changed the accounting for business acquisitions. Accounting for
business combinations under this standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination
to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination. This standard was effective for us on September
1, 2009. The standard had no immediate impact on our consolidated financial statements but could
affect our financial position and results of operations depending on future acquisitions.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new standard which established the accounting for and reporting
of noncontrolling interests (NCIs) in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries and the loss of
control of subsidiaries. This standard requires all entities to report NCIs (previously reported as
minority interests) in subsidiaries within equity in the consolidated financial statements, but
separate from the parent shareholders equity. This standard also requires any acquisitions or
dispositions of NCIs that do not result in a change of control to be accounted for as equity
transactions. Further, it requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. The standard was effective for us on September 1, 2009. Provisions of
this standard were applied to all NCIs prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which were applied retrospectively to all periods presented. As a result, upon
adoption, we retroactively reclassified the Minority Interest balance reported in the liabilities
section of the consolidated balance sheet to a new component of equity with respect to NCIs in
consolidated subsidiaries. The adoption of this standard also impacted certain captions identifying
net income including NCI and net income attributable to Robbins & Myers, Inc. Additional
disclosures required by this standard are also included in Note 8. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amended the list of factors that should
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
recognized intangible assets under ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The new standard
applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets as well
as intangible assets acquired in business combinations and asset acquisitions. Under this standard,
entities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must consider the historical
experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements, or, in the absence of historical
experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or
extension. This standard was effective for the Company on September 1, 2009 and required certain
additional disclosures (included in Note 2 above) and application to useful life estimates
prospectively for intangible assets acquired after August 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provides additional guidance on
employers disclosures about the plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plans. The disclosures required by the standard include a description of how investment allocation
decisions are made, major
12
Table of Contents
categories of plan assets, and concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additionally, this
standard requires disclosures similar to those required for fair value measurements and disclosures
under ASC 820 with respect to fair value of plan assets, such as the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure fair value and information with respect to classification of plan assets
in hierarchy of the source of information used to determine their value (see Note 13). The
disclosures under this standard are required for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. We
are currently evaluating the requirements of these additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a new standard regarding interim disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments. The standard essentially expands the disclosure about fair value of
financial instruments that were previously required only annually to also be required for interim
period reporting. In addition, the standard requires certain additional disclosures regarding the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. This
standard was effective for the Company on September 1, 2009 on a prospective basis. The additional
disclosures required by this standard are included in Note 13.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, that amends existing disclosure requirements under ASC
820, by adding required disclosures about items transferring into and out of levels 1 and 2 in the
fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about purchase, sales, issuances, and settlements
relative to level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This ASU is effective for us in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2010, except for the requirement to provide level 3 activity of purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective beginning our fiscal 2012. Since
this standard impacts disclosure requirements only, we do not expect its adoption to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements, which amends ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This ASU which was effective immediately,
removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated. We adopted this standard in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
13
Table of Contents
NOTE 13 Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued an accounting standard, codified in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. We adopted this standard on September 1, 2008 for all financial assets and
liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually).
In February 2008, the FASB deferred the effective date for certain nonfinancial assets and
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008. The Company adopted the remaining provisions of this fair value measurement standard related
to nonfinancial assets and liabilities, including goodwill and intangibles, prospectively on
September 1, 2009.
The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain financial assets at fair value on
a recurring basis as of February 28, 2010 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices | Significant | |||||||||||||||
in Active | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value at | Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
February 28, | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
$ | 132,420 | $ | 132,420 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | 132,420 | $ | 132,420 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
(1) | Our cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash in banks, commercial paper and overnight investments in highly rated financial institutions. |
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities at Fair value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the
assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair
value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). At
February 28, 2010, no fair value adjustments or fair value measurements were required for
nonfinancial assets or liabilities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and debt. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying values because of the
short term nature of these instruments. The fair value of long term debt instruments equal their
carrying value due to the short period until maturity or the variable rate nature of the
instruments.
NOTE 14 Subsequent event
On March 6, 2010, unionized employees at the Companys Chemineer manufacturing facility in Dayton,
Ohio, rejected the Companys labor contract offer and initiated a work stoppage. Operations at the
facility have continued during this work stoppage, and the Company does not expect a material
effect on its consolidated fiscal 2010 third quarter results.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Overview
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of engineered, application-critical equipment
and systems for the energy, industrial, chemical and pharmaceutical markets worldwide. We
attribute our success to our close and continuing interaction with customers; innovative products;
our manufacturing, sourcing and application engineering expertise; competitive cost structure and
our ability to serve and support customers globally. We attempt to continually develop initiatives
to improve our performance in these key areas. In late calendar year 2008 through mid calendar
year 2009, demand for most of our products started slowing due to lower oil and natural gas prices
as well as the worldwide economic downturn, which affected our operating results. We responded to
these challenging business conditions by cutting costs and initiating restructuring programs which
are intended to reduce manufacturing capacity while increasing utilization, standardizing product
offerings to allow greater utilization of our lower cost manufacturing capacities, leveraging
functional resources, and further integrating our business activities. In addition, we are
continuing our focus on emerging markets where economic growth remains well above the global
average and are committed to increasing margins through productivity initiatives, reductions in
discretionary spending and close management of fixed costs. We expect to continue our
restructuring and other permanent cost cutting measures through fiscal 2010 and into fiscal 2011.
Worldwide economic recovery is expected to gain strength in our fiscal 2010. First and second
quarter 2010 order levels were sequentially higher across all of our operating segments reflecting
these improving economic conditions.
Our Company has a Venezuelan subsidiary with net sales, operating income and total assets
representing approximately one percent of our consolidated financial statement amounts for fiscal
2009. Regulations in Venezuela require the purchase and sale of foreign currency to be made at an
official rate of exchange that is fixed from time to time by the Venezuelan government. We have
historically used the official exchange rate to translate the financial statements of our
Venezuelan subsidiary. The official exchange rate in Venezuela had been fixed at 2.15 bolivar
fuerte (VEF) to each U.S. Dollar for several years, despite significant inflation. In early
January 2010, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange
structure. The official exchange rate has been devalued from 2.15 VEF to each U.S. Dollar to 4.30
for non-essential goods and services and to 2.60 for essential goods. We expect our operations to
fall into the essential classification. As a result of this devaluation, we translated our
Venezuelan subsidiarys financial statements at the official rate for essential goods of 2.60 VEF
to each U.S. Dollar effective as of our second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The Venezuelan three year cumulative inflation rate exceeded 100 percent as of the beginning of our
second quarter of fiscal 2010. As a result, the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary
were consolidated and reported under highly inflationary accounting rules in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 and we recorded an income statement exchange loss of $0.6 million. Under highly
inflationary accounting, the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary are remeasured into
our Companys reporting currency (U.S. Dollars) and exchange gains and losses from this
remeasurement are reflected in current earnings, rather than accumulated other comprehensive income
on the balance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer considered highly inflationary.
If we are unsuccessful in sustaining the essential goods exchange rate of 2.60 VEF to each U.S.
Dollar, we could incur an additional income statement loss; however we do not expect that impact to
be material to our financial statements.
With approximately 62% of our sales outside the United States, we were favorably impacted by
foreign currency translation in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period in the
prior year, due to the U.S. Dollar weakening relative to our other principal operating currencies.
Additionally, the assets and liabilities of our foreign operations are translated at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with related gains or losses reported as a separate
component of shareholders equity, except for Venezuela discussed
above. For the first half of fiscal 2010, foreign currency marginally impacted our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
15
Table of Contents
Our business consists of three market focused segments: Fluid Management, Process Solutions and
Romaco. Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we realigned our business segment
reporting structure as a result of organizational, management and operational changes implemented
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our Chemineer brand is now included in our Fluid Management
segment, instead of the Process Solutions segment where it was previously reported. Certain amounts
presented in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to our current
year presentation and to reflect this segment realignment.
Fluid Management. Order levels from customers served by our Fluid Management segment have
recovered since the second half of fiscal 2009 and are showing an upward trend in fiscal 2010. Our
primary objectives for this segment are to expand our geographic reach, commercialize new products
in our niche market sectors, develop new customer relationships, capture synergies within the
segment and more tightly integrate our operations. Our Fluid Management business segment designs,
manufactures and markets equipment and systems, including hydraulic drilling power sections,
down-hole and industrial progressing cavity pumps, wellhead systems, rod guides, tubing rotators,
pipeline closures and customized fluid agitation equipment and systems. These products are used in
oil and gas exploration and recovery, specialty chemical, wastewater treatment and a variety of
other industrial applications.
Process Solutions. Order levels in our Process Solutions segment have also slightly improved from
the second half of fiscal 2009 levels. However, pricing trends remain unfavorable, especially in
global chemical markets. Our primary objectives in this segment are to improve productivity,
rationalize capacity through integration of operations and process improvements, increase
capabilities and leverage our lower cost locations, integrate and harmonize our global standards
and increase our focus on aftermarket opportunities. Our Process Solutions business segment
designs, manufactures and services glass-lined reactors and storage vessels, customized process
equipment and systems and customized fluoropolymer-lined fittings, vessels and accessories,
primarily for the pharmaceutical and specialty chemical markets.
Romaco. The primary target markets for Romaco include pharmaceutical, healthcare and cosmetics.
Order levels in our Romaco segment have also trended higher in the first half of fiscal 2010
compared with fiscal 2009. Our primary objectives are to maintain our simplified business model,
streamline operations by consolidating duplicate facilities, further develop our global
distribution capabilities, and increase our focus on aftermarket opportunities. Our Romaco business
segment designs, manufactures and markets packaging and secondary processing equipment for the
pharmaceutical, healthcare, nutriceutical and cosmetic industries. Packaging applications include
dosing; filling and sealing of vials, capsules, tubes, bottles and blisters; tablet counting and
packaging for bottles; blister and sachet packaging for various products including tablets and
powder; customized packaging; as well as secondary processing for sauces and semi solids.
16
Table of Contents
The following tables present the components of our consolidated income statement and segment
information for the three and six month periods of fiscal 2010 and 2009.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
67.7 | 65.3 | 67.2 | 63.5 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
32.3 | 34.7 | 32.8 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||
SG&A expenses |
27.3 | 22.0 | 26.5 | 22.7 | ||||||||||||
EBIT |
5.0 | % | 12.7 | % | 6.3 | % | 13.8 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
February 28, | February 28, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percents) | ||||||||||||||||
Segment |
||||||||||||||||
Fluid Management: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 66,970 | $ | 86,871 | $ | 135,158 | $ | 187,401 | ||||||||
EBIT |
13,633 | 22,283 | 30,367 | 50,507 | ||||||||||||
EBIT % |
20.4 | % | 25.7 | % | 22.5 | % | 27.0 | % | ||||||||
Process Solutions: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 39,867 | $ | 48,503 | $ | 83,400 | $ | 102,527 | ||||||||
EBIT |
(2,538 | ) | 1,937 | (4,189 | ) | 5,222 | ||||||||||
EBIT % |
(6.4 | )% | 4.0 | % | (5.0 | )% | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
Romaco: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 23,082 | $ | 28,451 | $ | 40,774 | $ | 51,868 | ||||||||
EBIT |
340 | 442 | (418 | ) | (1,001 | ) | ||||||||||
EBIT % |
1.5 | % | 1.6 | % | (1.0 | )% | (1.9 | )% |
The comparability of the segment data is impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates due
to translation of the non-U.S. Dollar denominated subsidiary results into U.S. Dollars.
EBIT (Income before interest and income taxes) is a non-GAAP measure. The Company uses this measure
to evaluate its performance and believes this measure is helpful to investors in assessing its
performance. A reconciliation of this measure to net income is included in our Consolidated
Condensed Income Statement. EBIT is not a measure of cash available for use by the Company.
17
Table of Contents
Three months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $129.9 million, $33.9 million
lower than net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Excluding the impact of currency
translation, sales decreased by $39.6 million, or 24.2%.
The Fluid Management segment had sales of $67.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010
compared with $86.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, a decrease of $19.9 million.
Excluding currency translation, sales decreased $21.3 million, or 24.6%. Orders for this segment
were $79.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with $66.7 million in the prior
year period. Excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, orders increased by 16.9%,
mainly due to increased demand for oilfield equipment products due to higher levels of oil and gas
exploration and recovery activity fueled by higher oil and natural gas prices worldwide in fiscal
2010. Ending backlog at February 28, 2010 is $46.9 million compared with $35.1 million at August
31, 2009.
The Process Solutions segment had sales of $39.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010
compared with $48.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, a decrease of 17.8%. Excluding
the impact of currency translation, sales decreased $11.1 million, or 22.8%, from the prior year
period. Orders for this segment were $44.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared
with $40.5 million in the prior year period. Excluding currency translation, orders increased 4.7%
from prior year period. This increase, we believe, is due to the slight recovery worldwide from the
economic downturn and credit crises in the prior year. Ending backlog at February 28, 2010 is $63.0
million compared with $59.7 million at August 31, 2009.
The Romaco segment, which is primarily a European-based business, had sales of $23.1 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with $28.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Excluding the impact of currency translation, sales decreased $7.2 million or 25.3% from the prior
year period. Orders increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and were $30.8 million compared
with $21.1 million in the same period of the prior year. We believe that this increase is due to
our increased focus on global market opportunities and product innovation combined with recovery in
the worldwide markets. Adjusting for changes in currency exchange rates, orders increased 31.7%
from prior year levels. Ending backlog at February 28, 2010 is $43.9 million compared with $40.1
million at August 31, 2009. Backlog at February 28, 2010 was reduced by approximately $9.3 million
for an order cancellation. The order was originally recorded in fiscal 2006, and the order
cancellation is not reflected as a reduction in our second quarter fiscal 2010 orders.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
Consolidated EBIT for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was $6.5 million, a decrease of $14.3
million from the second quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily due to decreased sales volume described
above in our Fluid Management segment and pricing pressures in our Process Solutions segment.
The Fluid Management segment had EBIT of $13.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010,
compared with $22.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Excluding foreign currency
translation impact, EBIT declined by $9.0 million mainly due to the lower sales volume described
above and Venezuelan hyper-inflationary currency loss of $0.6 million, offset by an asset sale gain
of $0.6 million.
The Process Solutions segment had negative EBIT of $2.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 compared with EBIT of $1.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, a decrease of $4.4
million. The decrease in EBIT is due principally to lower sales activity and pricing pressures.
The Romaco segment had EBIT of $0.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a marginal
decrease of $0.1 million from the second quarter of fiscal 2009. This slight decrease in EBIT in
spite of a drop in sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of the
prior year resulted from operational streamlining, personnel reductions and other cost-cutting
measures.
Corporate costs in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $1.1 million higher than the same period
in the prior year due to lower currency gains.
18
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was 30.3% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with 25.5% in the
prior year period. The second quarter fiscal 2010 effective tax rate was lower than the statutory
tax rate primarily due to statute lapses and audit settlements for items previously reserved of
$0.8 million.
The second quarter fiscal 2009 effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate due to
repatriation of a portion of the earnings of certain international subsidiaries as well as
implementing certain one-time tax strategies, which resulted in an overall lower effective tax
rate.
Six months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the first half of fiscal 2010 were $259.3 million; $82.5 million lower
than net sales for the same period of fiscal 2009. Excluding the impact of currency translation,
sales decreased by 27.1% due to lower sales in all three of our segments in fiscal 2010.
The Fluid Management segment had sales of $135.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared
with $187.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower
customer demand resulting from reduced levels of oil and gas exploration and recovery activity that
began in our second quarter of fiscal 2009. Orders for this segment were $148.0 million in the
first half of fiscal 2010 compared with $167.0 million in the same prior year period and are
substantially higher than the order levels of the second half of fiscal 2009. Ending backlog at
February 28, 2010 is $46.9 million compared with $35.1 million at August 31, 2009.
The Process Solutions segment had sales of $83.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2010, lower
than the $102.5 million recorded in the same period of fiscal 2009. Excluding the impact of
currency translation, sales decreased by $23.1 million, or 22.6%, from the prior year period.
Segment orders in the first half of fiscal 2010 continued to improve from the second half of fiscal
2009 to $86.7 million, but were lower than the $98.3 million recorded in the first half of fiscal
2009. Excluding currency translation, orders decreased by $16.0 million, or 16.1% from the same
period in the prior year period. Ending backlog at February 28, 2010 is $63.0 million compared with
$59.7 million at August 31, 2009.
The Romaco segment had sales of $40.8 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with $51.9
million in the same period of fiscal 2009. Excluding the impact of currency translation, sales
decreased $14.8 million or 28.5% over the prior year period. Orders in the first half of fiscal
2010 of $58.0 million were strong compared with $47.8 million for the same period of prior year.
Adjusting for changes in currency exchange rates, orders increased 10.0% from the same period in
the prior year. We believe this order increase, mainly in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, is an
outcome of the global economic recovery combined with our increased focus on worldwide market
opportunities and product innovation. Ending backlog at February 28, 2010 is $43.9 million compared
with $40.1 million at August 31, 2009. Backlog at February 28, 2010 was reduced by approximately
$9.3 million for an order cancellation. The order was originally recorded in fiscal 2006, and the
order cancellation is not reflected as a reduction in our second quarter fiscal 2010 orders.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
Consolidated EBIT for the first half of fiscal 2010 was $16.3 million, a decrease of $30.9 million
from the same period of the prior year. Excluding the impact of currency translation, EBIT
decreased by $31.1 million. This decrease is mainly attributable to the lower sales volume
described above and pricing pressures in the Process Solutions segment.
The Fluid Management segment had EBIT of $30.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 as compared
with $50.5 million in the same prior year period, a decrease of $20.1 million, or 39.9%. This
decrease in EBIT is due principally to the sales decrease described above, Venezuelan currency loss
impact of $0.6 million in the second quarter, offset by a favorable insurance recovery of $0.8
million and an asset gain of $0.6 million.
The Process Solutions segment had negative EBIT of $4.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2010
compared with EBIT of $5.2 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2009. Excluding the impact of currency
translation, six
19
Table of Contents
month EBIT decreased $9.1 million. This decrease is due principally to lower
sales activity and pricing pressures in fiscal 2010.
The Romaco segment had negative EBIT of $0.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 and negative
EBIT of $1.0 million in the first half of fiscal 2009. The marginal improvement in EBIT, despite
lower sales in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of prior year, resulted
from operational efficiencies.
Corporate costs were $2.0 million higher in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same
period in fiscal 2009, primarily due to costs associated with strategic and legal matters and lower
foreign currency gains.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was 33.2% for the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with 30.3% in the
comparable prior year period. The current year rate is lower than the statutory tax rate primarily
due to statute lapses and audit settlements for items previously reserved of $0.8 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The prior year effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate due to repatriation of a
portion of the earnings of certain international subsidiaries, which resulted in an overall lower
effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities
In the first half of fiscal 2010, our cash flow provided by operations was $29.5 million, $24.6
million higher than in the same period of the prior year. This increase from the prior year,
despite lower net income, was from changes in working capital, primarily by reduction in inventory
levels to reflect the lower levels of customer demand and contributions from accounts payable and
accrued expenses.
We expect our available cash, fiscal 2010 operating cash flow and amounts available under our
credit agreement to be adequate to fund fiscal year 2010 operating needs, shareholder dividends,
capital expenditures, repayment of our $30.0 million Senior Notes and additional share repurchases,
if any.
Investing Activities
Our capital expenditures were $3.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with $7.0
million in the first half of fiscal 2009. We reduced our capital expenditures due to lower
production levels and completion of prior year investment programs.
Financing Activities
On October 27, 2008 we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3.0
million of our currently outstanding common shares. We have acquired approximately 2.0 million of
our outstanding common shares for $39.1 million under the repurchase program in the first quarter
of fiscal 2009. There were no such share repurchases in the first half of fiscal 2010.
20
Table of Contents
Credit Agreement
We have $30.0 million of Senior Notes that are due on May 3, 2010 and therefore are classified as a
current liability at February 28, 2010. We have available cash to repay these Senior Notes, as well
as the ability to refinance these Senior Notes on a long-term basis under our Bank Credit Agreement
(Agreement). Our Agreement provides that we may borrow on a revolving credit basis up to a
maximum of $150.0 million and includes a $100.0 million expansion feature. All outstanding amounts
under the Agreement are due and payable on December 19, 2011. Interest is variable based upon
formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the Agreement, at our option, and is
payable quarterly. Indebtedness under the Agreement and the Senior Notes is unsecured, except for
the pledge of the stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and approximately two-thirds of the stock of
certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. While no amounts are outstanding under the Agreement at February
28, 2010, we have $27.1 million of standby letters of credit outstanding at February 28, 2010.
These standby letters of credit are used as security for advance payments received from customers,
and for future payments to our vendors and reduce the amount we may borrow under the Agreement.
Accordingly, under the Agreement we have $122.9 million of unused borrowing capacity.
Six banks participate in our revolving credit agreement. We are not dependent on any single bank
for our financing needs.
Following is information regarding our long-term contractual obligations and other commitments
outstanding as of February 28, 2010:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Two to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term contractual | One year | three | Four to | After five | ||||||||||||||||
obligations | Total | or less | years | five years | years | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 31,029 | $ | 30,853 | $ | 176 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Operating leases (1) |
14,000 | 5,000 | 6,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash
obligations |
$ | 45,029 | $ | 35,853 | $ | 6,176 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||||||||||
(1) | Operating leases are estimated as of February 28, 2010, and consist primarily of building and equipment leases. |
Unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, in the amount of $6.2 million, have
been excluded from the table because we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the
timing of the future payments. The only other commercial commitments outstanding were standby
letters of credit of $27.1 million, which are substantially due within one year.
Critical Accounting Policies
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we follow accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, which in many cases require us to make assumptions,
estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported. Many of these policies are
straightforward. There are, however, some policies that are critical because they are important in
determining the financial condition and results of operations and some may involve management
judgments due to the sensitivity of the methods, assumptions and estimates necessary in determining
the related income statement, asset and/or liability amounts. These policies are described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009. There have been no material changes in the
accounting policies followed by us during fiscal year 2010 other than the adoption of a new
accounting standard related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, as
discussed in Note 12.
21
Table of Contents
Safe Harbor Statement
In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements
identified by use of words such as expects, anticipates, believes, and similar expressions.
These statements reflect managements current expectations and involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those stated. The most significant of these risks and
uncertainties are described in our Form 10-K report filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and include, but are not limited to: the cyclical nature of some of our markets; a
significant decline in capital expenditures in our primary markets; a major decline in oil and
natural gas prices; reduced demand due to the general worldwide economic downturn and general
credit market crises; our ability to realize the benefits of our restructuring programs; increases
in competition; changes in the availability and cost of our raw materials; foreign exchange rate
fluctuations as well as economic or political instability in international markets and the
performance of our business in hyperinflationary environments, such as Venezuela; work stoppages
related to union negotiations; customer order cancellations; the possibility of product liability
lawsuits that could harm our business; events or circumstances which result in an impairment of, or
valuation against, assets; the potential impact of U.S. and foreign legislation, government
regulations, and other governmental action, including those relating to export and import of
products and materials, and changes in the interpretation and application of such laws and
regulations; the outcome of audit, compliance, administrative or investigatory reviews; proposed
changes in U.S. tax law which could impact our future tax expense and cash flow; and decline in the
market value of our pension plans investment portfolios affecting our financial condition and
results of operations. Except as otherwise required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to
publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In our normal operations, we have market risk exposure to foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. There has been no significant change in our market risk exposure with respect to
these items during the quarter ended February 28, 2010, except
for the change to highly inflationary accounting for our Venezuelan
subsidiary as discussed in the Overview section of
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations at Item 2 of this
Report. For additional information see
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk at Item 7A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(A) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO),
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls) as of February 28, 2010. Disclosure Controls are
controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of
Disclosure Controls includes an evaluation of some components of our internal control over
financial reporting, and internal control over financial reporting is also separately evaluated on
an annual basis.
Based on this evaluation, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28,
2010.
(B) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
Table of Contents
Part IIOther Information
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For information regarding factors that could affect the Companys operations, financial
condition and liquidity, see the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
A summary of the Companys repurchases of its common shares during the quarter ended February
28, 2010 is as follows:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | Maximum Number of Shares | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average Price | Part of Publicly | that May | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid per | Announced Plans or | Yet Be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased(a) | Share | Programs(b) | the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
December 2009 |
0 | | 0 | 992,463 | ||||||||||||
January 2010 |
0 | | 0 | 992,463 | ||||||||||||
February 2010 |
0 | | 0 | 992,463 | ||||||||||||
Total |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
(a) | The Company did not repurchase any of its common shares during the quarter ended February 28, 2010. | |
(b) | On October 27, 2008, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 3.0 million of our outstanding common shares (the Program). In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,007,537 of our outstanding common shares pursuant to the Program. In connection with the Program, the Company entered into a Rule 10b5-1 securities repurchase plan which was effective November 17, 2008 through January 7, 2009. The Program will expire when we have repurchased all the authorized shares under the Program, unless terminated earlier by a Board resolution. |
23
Table of Contents
Item 5. Other Information
a) | The Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Annual Meeting) of Robbins & Myers, Inc. was held on January 6, 2010. | ||
b) | Our Board of Directors (Board) comprised of eight directors, divided into two classes of four directors, with one class of directors elected at each annual meeting of shareholders for a term of two years. Effective with the commencement of the Annual Meeting on January 6, 2010, the Board has reduced the number of authorized directors to seven, with one class comprised of three directors and the other of four directors. At the Annual Meeting on January 6, 2010, the following persons were elected directors of Robbins & Myers, Inc. for a term of office expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2012: Richard J. Giromini, Stephen F. Kirk and Peter C. Wallace. The other directors whose terms of office continued after the Annual Meeting are: Andrew G. Lampereur, Thomas P. Loftis, Dale L. Medford and Albert J. Neupaver. David T. Gibbons, whose term of office as director expired at the Annual Meeting on January 6, 2010, retired from the Board at the end of his term. | ||
c) | At the Annual Meeting on January 6, 2010, three items were voted on by shareholders, namely: |
1) | The election of directors in which, as noted above, Messrs. Giromini, Kirk and Wallace were elected: |
Votes For | Votes Withheld | |||||||
Richard J. Giromini |
29,846,725 | 816,653 | ||||||
Stephen F. Kirk |
24,679,955 | 5,983,423 | ||||||
Peter C. Wallace |
29,799,122 | 864,256 |
2) | Re-approval of the performance goals in the Robbins & Myers, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended, was approved with 27,885,548 votes cast for approval, 2,040,343 against approval and 737,486 abstentions. | ||
3) | Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2010, was approved with 31,088,219 votes cast for approval, 568,867 against approval and 40,644 abstentions. |
Item 6. Exhibits
a) | Exhibits see INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
24
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. |
||||
DATE: March 24, 2010 | BY | /s/ Christopher M. Hix | ||
Christopher M. Hix | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
DATE: March 24, 2010 | BY | /s/ Kevin J. Brown | ||
Kevin J. Brown | ||||
Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
25
Table of Contents