Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-13 - ANNUAL REPORT 2009 - FPB BANCORP INC | exhibit13.htm |
| EX-32.1 - SOX CEO CERT - FPB BANCORP INC | exhibit32_1.htm |
| EX-31.1 - CEO CERT - FPB BANCORP INC | exhibit31_1.htm |
| EX-32.2 - SOX CFO CERT - FPB BANCORP INC | exhibit32_2.htm |
| EX-31.2 - CFO CERT - FPB BANCORP INC | exhibit31_2.htm |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________________ to _____________
Commission File No. 000-33351
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
|
|
FLORIDA
|
65-1147861
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1301 SE Port St. Lucie Boulevard
|
Port St. Lucie, FL
|
34952
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(772) 225-5930
Issuer’s Telephone Number
Securities Registered Under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
Securities Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [] Yes [X]No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
[] Yes []No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]Yes []No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). □Yes □ No *This registrant has not yet been phased into the interactive data requirements.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. []
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [] Accelerated filer []
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). []Yes [X]No
The issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $13,967,000.
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
As of February 26, 2010, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $3,498,680.
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.
As of February 26, 2010, the Issuer had 2,058,047 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the 2009 Annual Report, filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2010 are incorporated in Part III of this Form 10-K by reference.
2009 Form 10-K Annual Report
| Contents | Page | |
| PART I. | ||
| Item 1. | Business |
1
|
| Risk Factors | 14 | |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
14
|
| Item 2. | Properties | 14 |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 15 |
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 15 |
| PART II. | ||
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities |
15
|
| Selected Financial Data | 15 | |
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 15 |
| Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 16 | |
| Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 16 | |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 16 |
| Item 9B. | Other Information | 16 |
| PART III. | ||
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 17 |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 17 |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 17 |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 17 |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountants Fees and Services | 17 |
| PART IV. | ||
| Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 17 |
| SIGNATURES | 19 | |
PART I
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements as defined by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this document, or in the documents incorporated by reference, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “may”, “intend” and “expect” and similar expressions are some of the forward-looking statements used in these documents. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause results to change materially include competition, inflation, general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, and changes in the value of collateral securing loans First Peoples Bank has made, among other things.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
FPB Bancorp, Inc.
FPB was incorporated on September 5, 2001. On December 3, 2001, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of First Peoples Bank in a one-for-one share exchange. As of December 31, 2009, we had total consolidated assets of $248.2 million, and total consolidated stockholders’ equity of $14.6 million.
First Peoples Bank
The Bank commenced banking operations in Port St. Lucie, Florida, on April 26, 1999, as a state-chartered commercial bank. Our customers are primarily individuals, professionals, small and medium size businesses, and seasonal retirees located predominantly in St. Lucie, Martin and Indian River counties, Florida. We currently have six retail full-service banking offices located in Port St. Lucie, Stuart, Palm City, Fort Pierce, and Vero Beach, Florida. Our Stuart branch office opened for business in December 2003, the Fort Pierce branch office opened in June 2004, the Vero Beach branch office opened in March 2006, the Palm City branch office opened in January, 2008, and the Gatlin branch office opened in May 2008. The Bank also opened an Operations Center in March of 2007. Our primary business is attracting deposits from the general public and using those deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, to originate loans and to purchase securities.
We offer a broad range of retail and commercial banking services, including various types of deposit accounts and loans for businesses and consumers. As part of our community bank approach, officers are encouraged to actively participate in community activities and organizations.
In June, 2008, the Bank formed a subsidiary, Treasure Coast Holdings, Inc., for the sole purpose of managing foreclosed assets.
Operating and Business Strategy
We are organized as a locally-owned, locally managed community financial institution, owned and managed by people who are actively involved in our market area and committed to our economic growth and development. With local ownership, management, and directors, we believe that we can be more responsive to the communities we serve. Local ownership allows faster, more responsive and flexible decision-making which is not generally available at the majority of financial institutions in or near our market area which mainly consist of branch offices of large regional holding company banks with headquarters located elsewhere in the United States.
(continued)
Our principal business is to attract deposits from the general public and to invest those funds in various types of loans and other interest-earning assets. Funds are provided for these investments from the proceeds from the sale of investments, from amortization and repayment of outstanding loans and investments, from net deposit inflow, and from borrowings. Our earnings depend primarily upon the difference between (1) non-interest income, the interest and fees we receive from loans, the securities held in our investment portfolio and other investments, and (2) the expenses we incur in connection with obtaining funds for lending (including interest paid on deposits and other borrowings) and expenses relating to day-to-day operations.
To the extent market conditions permit, our strategy is intended to insulate our interest rate gap from adverse changes in interest rates by maintaining spreads through the adjustability of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our ability to reduce interest-rate risk in our loan and investment portfolios depends upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including among others, competition for loans and deposits in our market area and conditions prevailing in the economy.
Our primary sources of funds for loans and for other general business purposes are our capital, deposits and loan repayments. We expect that loan repayments will be a relatively stable sources of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows will be significantly influenced by prevailing interest rates, money market rates, and general economic conditions. Generally, short-term borrowings may be used to compensate for reductions in normal sources of funds while longer-term borrowings may be used to support expanded lending activities.
We continually seek to develop new business through an ongoing program of personal calls on both present and potential customers. As a local independent bank, we utilize traditional local advertising media to promote and develop loans and deposits. In addition, all of our directors have worked and lived in or near our market area for a number of years. We believe that these factors, coupled with the past and continued involvement of the directors, officers and staff in various local community activities, will further promote our image as a locally-owned independent institution, which we believe is an important factor to our targeted customer base.
Personalized Products and Service. We strive to provide innovative financial products and high service levels, and to maintain strong customer relationships. We seek customers who prefer to conduct business with a locally owned and managed financial institution.
Local Management and Community Focus. We approach banking with a community focus, emphasizing local management and local decision-making. Our main office is located in one of the primary business districts of Port St. Lucie on Port St. Lucie Boulevard. Most of the executive officers and directors are long-time residents of the tri-county area, and all management decisions are made within our market area.
Dedicated Employees. We believe that the key to our success lies with our employees, because it is through our employees that we are able to provide our banking customers with a very high level of service and attention. To this end, we seek to hire well qualified banking professionals who are committed to providing a superior level of banking service and are willing to accept a significant degree of responsibility. Each employee focuses on the individual customer’s needs and strives to deliver the specific products and services that are best suited to achieve the customer’s financial goals.
Internal Growth and Branch Expansion. Our first branch office opened in December of 2003 at 715 Colorado Avenue in Stuart, Florida, in a 6,100 square foot leased facility.
Our second branch office opened in June of 2004 in a two-story branch building at 2500 Virginia Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida. The bank occupies 3,733 square feet on the first floor. We are leasing 5,025 square feet on the second floor to unaffiliated parties.
In March 2006, we opened a full-service branch office at 4000 20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, in a former bank branch building. An 11,000 square foot Operations Center, which is leased, opened in March of 2007, in Jensen Beach, Florida, and a fifth branch office at 3001 Martin Downs Boulevard in Palm City, Florida opened in January of 2008 and is 3,000 square feet. A 3,700 square foot building now houses our sixth branch office, which opened in May of 2008 on Gatlin Boulevard, in Port St. Lucie, Florida.
We have established a courier program which consists of six persons. This program currently enables us to service commercial deposit and loan customers in Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River Counties who are not in close proximity to the Bank. This has proven to be a great convenience to our customers, especially the small business owners.
Develop Commercial Loan Relationships. Since our inception, we have been gradually building our loan portfolio mix by purchasing, originating and retaining commercial and commercial real estate loans. We believe that large regional and out-of-state financial institutions have shifted their focus away from lending to small and medium-sized business. As part of our lending efforts, we have been developing, within our market, strong commercial loan and deposit relationships with small to medium-sized businesses which tend to value personalized service and attention to their specific borrowing needs. Timely decisions and prompt, courteous service is very important and we believe will foster long-term, quality loan and deposit relationships. In addition, we are active in the Small Business Administration lending program earning our Preferred Lender Status in 2002.
Residential Loans. In order to be a full service bank, we engage in residential lending activities which include the origination of residential mortgage loans. Our strategy is to sell, to the extent practical, all of our fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loan originations. The sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market provides additional non-interest income, including mortgage loan origination fees and gains on the sale of mortgage loans. Typically a minimal amount of these loans are held in our portfolio.
Maintain Strong Credit Quality. We place a great deal of emphasis on maintaining strong asset quality. The asset quality we are experiencing to date is principally due to our strict underwriting criteria, the relationship of our senior officers and directors to our customers and their knowledge of the demographics and needs of our local community. Nonetheless, due to the economic downturn, particularly in Florida, we have experienced a decrease in our overall asset quality in 2009 and 2008.
Primary Market Areas. We are the only financial institution headquartered in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Our geographic market area encompasses Martin County, St. Lucie County, and Indian River County, Florida. St. Lucie, Martin and Indian River Counties have a total combined year-round adult population of approximately 564,670. From 2000 to 2008, the population of St. Lucie County grew at a compound annual rate of 4.7%, while Martin County grew by 1.6% and Indian River County by 2.9%. In 2007, the U.S. Department of Commerce recognized St. Lucie County as having one of the fastest growing populations of all U.S. Counties.
St. Lucie West is home to the spring training facility for the New York Mets, the St. Lucie Mets and the PGA training center, one of the better golf training centers in the U.S.
Port St. Lucie is home to one of two family-oriented Club Med’s in the U.S. Major employers include St. Lucie County Medical Center, Liberty Medical, Indian River State College, Walmart, Lawnwood Regional Medical Center, QVC and Publix Supermarkets.
The newest major development in St. Lucie County is the Town of Tradition, which is a master-planned, mixed-use community. The Florida Center for Innovation at Tradition is a 120-acre research park under development, anchored by the $40 million East Coast headquarters for Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies. The 108,000 square foot Torrey Pines Facility is just the beginning of a much larger group of biotechnology companies planning to move into the 150 acre Florida Center for Innovation at Tradition. There is much hope that the biotech industry coming to Port St. Lucie will influence positive change in the economic structure of the city and the immediate surrounding area. In addition, the Oregon Health & Science University’s Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute will be expanding into a 130,000 square-foot facility, and the Mann Research Center, a six-building, 400,000 square foot life sciences complex adjacent to both facilities is planned, along with a new medical campus for Martin Memorial Health Systems. This local expansion is estimated to bring hundreds of new job opportunities to the St. Lucie County area. Our sixth branch office, which opened in May of 2008, is located on Gatlin Boulevard, just outside of the Tradition development.
(continued)
In Martin County, some of the major employers include Martin Memorial Health Systems, Martin County School District, Publix Supermarkets, Home Depot and Armellini Express Lines. In Indian River County, some of the major employers include Indian River Medical Center, Piper Aircraft, Inc., John’s Island, Sebastian River Medical Center and Visiting Nurse Association.
As of June 30, 2008, the 205 commercial bank and thrift branch offices operating within Martin County, St. Lucie County, and Indian River County, Florida maintained aggregate deposits of approximately $11.5 billion, representing a 27.12% increase over June 30, 2004 levels. Of the total deposits as of June 30, 2008, an estimated 61.59%, or $7.1 billion, of commercial bank and thrift deposits were held at offices of large, out-of-state institutions.
Competition. Our primary market areas are St. Lucie, Martin and Indian River Counties, Florida. The banking business in these areas is extremely competitive, and the level of competition may increase further, which may limit our asset growth and profitability. We experience competition in both lending and attracting deposits from other banks, savings institutions, and non-bank financial institutions located within our market area, many of which are significantly larger institutions. These institutions, which include Bank of America, Wachovia Bank (now Wells Fargo), Riverside National Bank of Florida, National City Bank (now PNC Bank), Seacoast National Bank, and SunTrust Bank offer services, including extensive and established branch networks and trust services, that we do not provide. Non-bank competitors competing for deposits and deposit-type accounts include mortgage bankers and brokers, finance companies, credit unions, securities firms, money market funds, life insurance companies and the mutual funds industry. For loans, we encounter competition from other banks, savings associations, finance companies, mortgage bankers and brokers, insurance companies, small loan and credit card companies, credit unions, pension trusts and securities firms, including many competing lenders that are outside our geographic market area.
The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates, the range of financial services offered, convenience of office locations, and the flexibility of office hours. The primary factors in competing for loans include interest rates, loan fees, flexible terms, and timely loan decisions. We compete for deposits by offering a variety of deposit programs geared to our potential customers. By developing strong ties in the local community and providing a high quality of personal banking services to families, professionals, retirees, and owner-operated businesses with an emphasis on flexibility and timely responses to customer demands, we believe that we can successfully compete in our market for deposits.
With respect to loans, we have targeted small to medium-sized businesses as our customer base, because we believe that the large out-of-state financial institutions continue to shift the focus away from these business opportunities.
Loan Activities
General. Our primary business emphasis is on making commercial business, commercial real estate and consumer loans. As of December 31, 2009, the net loan portfolio totaled $184.3 million, or 74.26% of total assets.
(continued)
Loan Underwriting. Loan activities are subject to underwriting standards and loan origination procedures prescribed by the board of directors and management. Loan applications are obtained to determine the borrower’s ability to repay, and the more significant items on these applications are verified through the use of credit reports, financial statements and confirmations. Our loan policy for real estate loans generally requires that collateral be appraised by an independent, outside appraiser approved by the board of directors.
General Loan Policies. Loans are approved at various management levels up to and including the board of directors, depending on the amount of the loan. Loan approvals are made in accordance with delegated authority approved by the board of directors. Generally loans less than $150,000 are approved by certain authorized officers. The President has individual loan authority up to $250,000. Loans up to $500,000 are approved by an officer’s loan committee, and loans between $500,000 and $1,000,000 are approved by a directors’ loan committee. All loans over $1,000,000 require approval by the board of directors.
For real estate loans, our policy is to have a valid mortgage lien on real estate securing a loan and to obtain a title insurance policy, which insures the validity and priority of the lien. Borrowers must also obtain hazard insurance policies prior to closing, and when the property is in a flood prone area, flood insurance is required.
We are permitted to lend up to 100% of the appraised value of the real property securing a single family residential mortgage loan. However, if the amount of a conventional, residential loan (including a construction loan or a combination construction and permanent loan) originated or refinanced exceeds 80% of the appraised value or of the purchase price, whichever is less, we are required by federal regulations to obtain private mortgage insurance on that portion of the principal amount of the loan that exceeds 80% of the value of the property or 65% on “raw” land loans. We will originate single-family residential mortgage loans with up to a 90% loan-to-value ratio if the required private mortgage insurance is obtained. Loans over 90% loan-to-value ratio are limited to special community support programs or one of the FHA, VA, or Farmers Home Administration guarantee or insurance programs. The loan-to-value ratio on a home secured by a junior lien generally does not exceed 90%, including the amount of the first mortgage, of the collateral. With respect to home loans granted for construction or combination construction/permanent financing, we will lend up to 80% of the appraised value of the property on an “as completed” basis. The loan-to-value ratio on multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans is generally limited to 80% of value. Consumer loans are considered to be loans to natural persons for personal, family or household purposes, and these loans may be unsecured, secured by personal property or secured by liens on real estate which, when aggregated with prior liens, equals or exceeds the appraised value of the collateral property.
The maximum amount which we could have loaned to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities as of December 31, 2009, was approximately $4.8 million on a secured basis, according to the Florida Banking Statutes, 658.48 or $2.9 million on a secured basis, based on our in-house policy limit. Our largest loan to a single borrower is a $3.7 million loan to a corporation, secured by a first commercial real estate mortgage on 40 acres of land. The loan is current.
Interest rates charged on loans are affected principally by competitive factors, the demand for such loans and the supply of funds available for lending purposes. These factors are, in turn, affected by general economic conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the Federal Reserve Board, legislative tax policies and government budgetary matters.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate loans are secured primarily by office, medical and retail business properties located in St. Lucie, Martin and Indian River Counties. These types of loans amounted to $107 million or 56.3% of the total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Commercial real estate loans may be amortized for up to 25 years, but frequently mature in three to six years.
(continued)
Commercial and multi-family real estate loans are originated with a loan-to-value ratio generally not exceeding 80%. Loans secured by this type of collateral will continue to be a part of our future loan program. Commercial and multi-family real estate loans are generally larger and involve a greater degree of risk than residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial property depend to a large degree on results of operations and management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. At December 31, 2009, the largest commercial and multi-family real estate loan was approximately $3.7 million to a Florida corporation, secured by 40 acres of land. The loan is current.
Commercial Loans. Commercial loans are business loans that are not secured by real estate and are dependent on business cash flows for repayment. At December 31, 2009, the largest commercial loan not secured by real estate was $963,000 loan to a corporation, secured by a motor home and a third mortgage on property located in St. Lucie County, Florida . While we have made Small Business Administration loans, we generally will underwrite commercial loans for our own portfolio utilizing other sources of collateral and a maximum of 80% loan to value. The majority of our commercial loans are adjustable-rate loans with adjustment periods ranging from daily to 5 years. As of December 31, 2009 we had $64 million in commercial loans, which was 33.6% of the total loan portfolio.
Residential Real Estate Loans. We currently originate fixed-rate residential mortgage loans and adjustable-rate mortgage loans for terms of up to 30 years. As of December 31, 2009, $790,000 or 0.42% of our total loan portfolio consisted of one-to-four family residential real estate loans. As of such date, all of these loans were adjustable-rate mortgage loans.
The residential adjustable-rate mortgage loans currently being offered have interest rates that are fixed for a period of one, three or five years and then after the initial period the interest rate is adjusted annually based upon an index such as the yield on treasury securities adjusted to a one-year maturity, plus a margin. Most of our adjustable-rate mortgage loans limit the amount of any increase or decrease in the interest rate at each adjustment and over the life of the loan. Typical limitations are 2% for each adjustment with a limit of 6% over the life of the loan. We may offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans with different annual and life-of-loan interest change limits, shorter or longer adjustment periods and different base indices as may be appropriate to meet market demands, portfolio needs, and our interest-rate risk management goals. While the initial rate on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may be below a fully indexed rate, the loan is always underwritten based on the borrower’s ability to pay at the interest rate which would be in effect after adjustment of the loan. Some adjustable-rate mortgage loans include features that allow the borrower, under special conditions, to convert the loan to a fixed rate at the then prevailing market rates.
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans reduce our risk of changes in interest rates, but involve other risks because as interest rates increase, the borrower’s required payments increase, thus increasing the potential for default. Marketability of real estate loans is also affected by the level of interest rates.
Our fixed rate home loans are originated for 30-year amortization terms. Borrowers requesting a term of 15 years or less are usually granted an interest rate slightly lower than is offered for a 30-year amortizing loan. These loans are originated in compliance with documentation and underwriting standards which permit their sale in the secondary market to institutional investors such as Fannie Mae. Fixed-rate home loans include a “due on sale” clause, which provides us with the contractual right to declare the loan immediately due and payable in the event the borrower transfers ownership of the property without our consent. The “due on sale” provision is always enforced.
We generally sell all fixed rate, 30-year home loans in the secondary market. No such loans are held in our loan portfolio.
Consumer Loans. We make various types of consumer loans, the majority of which are installment loans, which also include automobile and boat loans, and home equity loans. Consumer loans are originated in order to provide a range of financial services to customers and to create stronger ties to our customers and because the shorter term and normally higher interest rates on such loans help maintain a profitable spread between our average loan yield and our cost of funds. The terms of installment consumer loans generally range from one to five years and are typically at a fixed rate of interest, while home equity loans are at a variable rate of interest. Underwriting standards for consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s repayment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loans. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security, if any, to the proposed loan amount. Consumer loans generally involve more credit risks than mortgage loans because of the type and nature of the collateral or absence of collateral. Consumer loan repayments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and are likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce and illness. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans. In some cases, repossessed collateral may not provide full repayment of the outstanding loan balance. Our belief is that the yields earned on consumer loans are commensurate with the credit risk associated with such loans and, therefore, we intend to continue to increase our investment in these types of loans. As of December 31, 2009, consumer loans amounted to $17 million, or 9.1% of the total loan portfolio.
Income from Loan Activities. Fees are earned in connection with loan commitments and originations, loan modifications, late payments, changes of property ownership and for miscellaneous services related to loans. Income from these activities varies from period to period with the volume and type of loans originated, sold and purchased, which in turn is dependent upon prevailing interest rates and their effect on the demand for loans in our primary service area.
Loan fees typically are charged at the time of loan origination and may be a flat fee or a percentage of the amount of the loan. Current accounting standards state that the total amount of such fees cannot be recognized as income immediately; rather the fees are deferred and taken into income over the contractual life of the loan, using a level yield method. If loans are prepaid or refinanced, all remaining deferred fees with respect to such loans are taken into income at that time.
Non-performing Loans and Repossessed Assets. When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan, our loan officers attempt to collect the payment by contacting the borrower. If a payment on a loan has not been received by the end of a grace period (usually 10 days from the payment due date), notices are sent at that time, with follow-up contacts made thereafter. In most cases, delinquencies are cured promptly. If the delinquency exceeds 29 days and is not cured through normal collection procedures, more formal measures are instituted to remedy the default, including the commencement of foreclosure proceedings. We will then attempt to negotiate with the delinquent borrower to establish a satisfactory payment schedule.
A loan is generally placed on non-accrual status and ceases accruing interest when loan payment performance is deemed unsatisfactory. All loans past due 90 days, however, are placed on non-accrual status, unless the loan is both well collateralized and in the process of collection. Cash payments received while a loan is classified as non-accrual are recorded as a reduction of principal as long as doubt exists as to full collection of all principal and interest.
If foreclosure is required, when completed, the property is sold at a public auction in which we will generally participate as a bidder. If we are the successful bidder, the acquired real estate property is then included in the foreclosed assets account until it is sold. We are permitted under federal regulations to finance sales of foreclosed assets by “loans to facilitate,” which may involve more favorable interest rates and terms than generally would be granted under normal underwriting guidelines.
At December 31, 2009, we had $15.1 million of non-accruing loans which were contractually past due 90 days or more, and renegotiated debt of $5.6 million. As of December 31, 2009, we have $6.7 million in foreclosed assets.
Asset Classification. Commercial banks are required to review and when appropriate classify their assets on a regular basis. The FDIC and state banking examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: “substandard,” “doubtful” and “loss.” Substandard assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. If full collection of principal and interest is doubtful, the insured institution establishes specific allowance for loan losses, in accordance with the guidelines established under FAS114. All or a portion of general loan loss allowances established to cover possible losses related to assets classified substandard or doubtful may be included in determining an institution’s regulatory capital, while specific valuation allowances for loan losses generally do not qualify as regulatory capital. Assets that do not warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but possess weaknesses, are classified as special mention and are closely monitored.
In 2009, non-performing assets totaled $22.7 million or 9.15% of total assets, as a result of a deterioration in credit quality and borrowers’ ability to meet their loan obligations, due mostly to the drop in real estate values and overall recessionary pressures.
Provision for Losses on Loans. The provision for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged against income. Loans are charged against the provision when we believe that the full collection of principal and interest is doubtful or when an actual loss is incurred. The provision is an estimated amount that we believe will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on evaluations of its collectibility. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, specific impaired loans, and current anticipated economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. While we use the best information available to us to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the provision may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. At December 31, 2009, our total allowance for loan losses was approximately $4.7 million representing 2.49% of total loans.
Personnel. As of December 31, 2009, we had 70 full-time employees and 8 part-time employees. The employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. We believe our relations with our employees to be good.
Employees are covered by a comprehensive employee benefit program which provides for, among other benefits, hospitalization and major medical insurance, short and long-term disability insurance, life insurance, and education assistance. Such employee benefits are considered by management to be generally competitive with employee benefits provided by other major employers in our geographic market area.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
As a one-bank holding company, we are subject to an extensive body of state and federal banking laws and regulations which impose specific requirements and restrictions on virtually all aspects of our operations. We are affected by government monetary policy and by regulatory measures affecting the banking industry in general.
The following is a brief summary of some of the statutes, rules and regulations which affect our operations. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions referred to below and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to our business. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business.
FPB Bancorp, Inc.
We are a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. As such, we are required to file annual reports and other information with the Federal Reserve regarding our business operations and those of our subsidiary. We are also subject to the supervision of, and to periodic inspections by, the Federal Reserve.
The Bank Holding Company Act generally requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:
| · | Acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of a bank; |
| · |
Acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank or bank holding company; or
|
| · | Merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. |
The Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve, require that, depending on the particular circumstances, either the Federal Reserve’s approval must be obtained or notice must be furnished to the Federal Reserve and not disapproved prior to any person or company, not a bank holding company, acquiring control of a bank holding company, subject to certain exemptions. Control is conclusively presumed to exist when an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and either the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.
Except as authorized by the Bank Holding Company Act and Federal Reserve regulations or order, a bank holding company is generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in any business other than the business of banking or managing and controlling banks. Some of the activities the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation to be proper incidents to the business of banking, and thus permissible for bank holding companies, include:
|
·
|
Making or servicing loans and certain types of leases;
|
|
·
|
Engaging in certain insurance and discount brokerage activities;
|
|
·
|
Performing certain data processing services;
|
|
·
|
Acting in certain circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor;
|
|
·
|
Providing management consulting services;
|
|
·
|
Owning savings associations; and
|
|
·
|
Making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare.
|
In accordance with Federal Reserve policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. In adhering to the Federal Reserve’s policy, we may be required to provide financial support to the Bank at a time when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, it might not be deemed advisable to provide such assistance. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, the Federal Reserve may also require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a non-bank subsidiary (other than a non-bank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve’s determination that the activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness or stability of any subsidiary depository institution of the bank holding company. Further, federal bank regulatory authorities have additional discretion to require a bank holding company to divest itself of any bank or non-bank subsidiary if the agency determines that divestiture may aid the depository institution’s financial condition.
First Peoples Bank
As a state-chartered bank, the Bank is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Department and the FDIC. Through December of 2009, our deposits are insured by the FDIC for a maximum of $250,000 per account title (through December 31, 2013), and unlimited for all non-interest bearing accounts (through June 30, 2010, unless extended). For this protection, we must pay a semi-annual statutory assessment and comply with the rules and regulations of the FDIC. The assessment levied on a bank for deposit insurance varies, depending on the capital position of each bank, and other supervisory factors. Currently, we are subject to the statutory assessment.
|
|
Areas regulated and monitored by the bank regulatory authorities include:
|
|
·
|
Security devices and procedures;
|
|
·
|
Adequacy of capitalization and loss reserves;
|
|
·
|
Loans;
|
|
·
|
Investments;
|
|
·
|
Borrowings;
|
|
·
|
Deposits;
|
|
·
|
Mergers;
|
|
·
|
Issuances of securities;
|
|
·
|
Payment of dividends;
|
|
·
|
Establishment of branches;
|
|
·
|
Corporate reorganizations;
|
|
·
|
Transactions with affiliates;
|
|
·
|
Maintenance of books and records; and
|
|
·
|
Adequacy of staff training to carry out safe lending and deposit gathering practices.
|
Capital Adequacy Requirements
Banks are subject to regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC. Until a bank and its holding company’s assets reach $500 million, the capital adequacy guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve are applied to bank holding companies on a non- consolidated basis, unless the bank holding company is engaged in non-bank activities involving significant leverage, or it has a significant amount of outstanding debt held by the general public. The Department’s and the FDIC’s risk-based capital guidelines apply directly to insured state banks, regardless of whether they are subsidiaries of a bank holding company. Both agencies’ requirements, which are substantially similar, establish minimum capital ratios in relation to assets, both on an aggregate basis as adjusted for credit risks and off balance sheet exposures. The risk weights assigned to assets are based primarily on credit risks. Depending upon the riskiness of a particular asset, it is assigned to a risk category. For example, securities with an unconditional guarantee by the United States government are assigned to the lowest risk category. The aggregate amount of assets assigned to each risk category is multiplied by the risk weight assigned to that category to determine the weighted values, which are added together to determine total risk-weighted assets.
Capital is then classified into two categories, Tier 1 and Tier 2. Tier 1 capital consists of common and qualifying preferred shareholder’s equity, less goodwill and other adjustments. Tier 2 capital consists of mandatory convertible, subordinated, and other qualifying term debt, preferred stock not qualifying for Tier 1 capital, and a limited amount of allowance for credit losses, up to a designated percentage of risk-weighted assets. Under the risk-based guidelines, financial institutions must maintain a specified minimum ratio of “qualifying” capital to risk-weighted assets. At least 50% of an institution’s qualifying capital must be “core” or “Tier 1” capital, and the balance may be “supplementary” or “Tier 2” capital. In addition, the guidelines require banks to maintain a minimum leverage ratio standard of capital adequacy. The leverage standard requires top-rated institutions to maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital to assets ratio of 3%. All other institutions are required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4% or greater, based upon their particular circumstances and risk profiles.
Federal banking regulators have adopted regulations revising the risk-based capital guidelines to further ensure that the guidelines take adequate account of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the adverse effect that changes in market interest rates may have on a bank’s financial condition and is inherent to the business of banking. Under the regulations, when evaluating a bank’s capital adequacy, the revised capital standards now explicitly include a bank’s exposure to declines in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates. The exposure of a bank’s economic value generally represents the change in the present value of its assets, less the change in the value of its liabilities, plus the change in the value of its interest rate off-balance sheet contracts.
Federal bank regulatory agencies possess broad powers to take prompt corrective action as deemed appropriate for an insured depository institution and its holding company, based on the institution’s capital levels. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institution in question is considered “well-capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly under-capitalized”, or “critically undercapitalized”. Generally, as an institution is deemed to be less well-capitalized, the scope and severity of the agencies’ powers increase, ultimately permitting the agency to appoint a receiver for the institution. Business activities may also be influenced by an institution’s capital classification. For instance, only a “well-capitalized” depository institution may accept brokered deposits without prior regulatory approval, and can engage in various expansion activities with prior notice, rather than prior regulatory approval. However, rapid growth, poor loan portfolio performance or poor earnings performance, or a combination of these factors, could change the capital position of our subsidiary banks in a relatively short period of time. Failure to meet these capital requirements could subject the subsidiary banks to prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIC, which may include filing with the appropriate bank regulatory authorities a plan describing the means and a schedule for achieving the minimum capital requirements. In addition, we would not be able to receive regulatory approval of any application that required consideration of capital adequacy, such as a branch or merger application, unless we could demonstrate a reasonable plan to meet the capital requirement within an acceptable period of time.
Dividends
Our ability to pay further cash dividends may depend almost entirely upon the amount of dividends that the Bank is permitted to pay by statutes or regulations. Additionally, the Florida Business Corporation Act provides that we may only pay dividends if the dividend payment would not render us insolvent, or unable to meet our obligations as they come due.
The Department limits a bank’s ability to pay dividends. As a state-chartered bank, we are subject to regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends, including a prohibition of payment of dividends from the banks’ capital under certain circumstances without the prior approval of the Department and the FDIC. Except with the prior approval of the Department, all dividends of any Florida bank must be paid out of retained net profits from the current period and the previous two years, after deducting expenses, including losses and bad debts. In addition, a state-chartered bank in Florida is required to transfer at least 20% of its net income to surplus until their surplus equals the amount of paid-in capital.
Other Laws
State usury and credit laws limit the amount of interest and various other charges collected or contracted by a bank on loans. Our loans are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
·
|
Federal Truth-In-Lending Act, which governs disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
·
|
Community Reinvestment Act, which requires financial institutions to meet their obligations to provide for the total credit needs of the communities they serve, including investing their assets in loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers;
|
|
·
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligations to meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
|
|
·
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibitive factors in extending credit;
|
|
·
|
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, which requires lenders to disclose certain information regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements, and prohibits certain lending practices, as well as limits escrow account amounts in real estate transactions;
|
|
·
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and
|
|
·
|
The rules and regulations of various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
|
|
|
Our operations are also subject to the:
|
|
·
|
The privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which requires us to maintain privacy policies intended to safeguard consumer financial information, to disclose these policies to our customers, and allow customers to “opt out” of having their financial service providers disclose their confidential financial information to non-affiliated third parties, subject to certain exceptions;
|
|
·
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and
|
|
·
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E, which govern automatic deposits to, and withdrawals from, deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of debit cards, automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
|
Interstate Banking and Branching
Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, eligible bank holding companies in any state are permitted, with Federal Reserve approval, to acquire banking organizations in any other state. The Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act also removed substantially all of the prohibitions on interstate branching by banks. The authority of a bank to establish and operate branches within a state, however, continues to be subject to applicable state branching laws. Under current Florida law, we are permitted to establish branch offices throughout Florida with the prior approval of the Department and the FDIC. In addition, with prior regulatory approval, we would be able to acquire existing banking operations in other states.
Financial Modernization
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 sought to achieve significant modernization of the federal bank regulatory framework by allowing the consolidation of banking institutions with other types of financial services firms, subject to various restrictions and requirements. In general, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed most of the federal statutory barriers which separated commercial banking firms from insurance and securities firms and authorized the consolidation of such firms in a “financial services holding company”. We have no immediate plans to utilize the structural options created by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, but may develop such plans in the future.
Anti-Money Laundering
After September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., the United States government acted in several ways to tighten control on activities perceived to be connected to money laundering and terrorist funding. A series of orders were issued which identify terrorists and terrorist organizations and require the blocking of property and assets of, as well as prohibiting all transactions or dealings with, such terrorists, terrorist organizations and those that assist or sponsor them. The USA Patriot Act enacted in 2001:
|
·
|
Substantially broadens existing anti-money laundering legislation and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States;
|
|
·
|
Imposes new compliance and due diligence obligations;
|
|
·
|
Creates new crimes and penalties;
|
|
·
|
Compels the production of documents located both inside and outside the United States; including those of foreign institutions that have a correspondent relationship in the United States; and
|
|
·
|
Clarifies the safe harbor from civil liability to customers.
|
|
·
|
In addition, the United States Treasury Department issued regulations in cooperation with the federal banking agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Department of Justice to:
|
|
·
|
Require customer identification and verification;
|
|
·
|
Expand the money-laundering program requirement to the major financial services sectors; including insurance and unregistered investment companies, such as hedge funds; and
|
|
·
|
Facilitate and permit the sharing of information between law enforcement and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions themselves.
|
The United States Treasury Department also has created the Treasury USA PATRIOT Act Task Force to work with other financial regulators, the regulated community, law enforcement and consumers to continually improve the regulations. Recently, enforcement of the USA PATRIOT Act, the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering laws and regulations has greatly increased from both State and Federal regulators.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
In response to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) was signed into law on October 3, 2008, and established the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). As part of TARP, the U.S. Treasury established the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) to provide up to $700 billion of funding to eligible financial institutions through the purchase of capital stock and other financial instruments for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. On December 5, 2008, FPB issued $5.8 million in preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 183,158 shares of common stock at $4.75 to the U.S. Treasury. In connection with EESA, there have been numerous actions by the Federal Reserve Board, Congress, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others to further the economic and banking industry stabilization efforts under EESA. It remains unclear at this time what further legislative and regulatory measures will be implemented under EESA affecting FPB.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
On February 17, 2009 President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), more commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery package. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future CPP recipients that are in addition to those previously announced by the U.S. Treasury, until the institution has repaid the U.S. Treasury, which is now permitted under ARRA without penalty and without the need to raise new capital, subject to the U.S. Treasury’s consultation with the recipient’s appropriate regulatory agency.
Future Legislation
Various other legislative and regulatory initiatives, including proposals to overhaul the banking regulatory system and to limit the investments that a depository institution may make with insured funds, are from time to time introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as regulatory agencies. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of FPB and the Bank in substantial and unpredictable ways, and could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance depending upon whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of FPB or the Bank. With the recent enactments of EESA and ARRA, the nature and extent of future legislative and regulatory changes affecting financial institutions is very unpredictable at this time. FPB cannot determine the ultimate effect that such potential legislation, if enacted, would have upon its financial condition or operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Our main office was purchased in 2002 for approximately $1.1 million. It is located at 1301 SE Port St. Lucie Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952. We purchased land in 2001 and built a two-story, 9,600 square foot branch building located at 2500 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. The entire first floor is occupied by the Bank, and it opened for business in June of 2004. The 5,025 square feet on the second floor is leased to third parties. We also lease our Stuart, Palm City and Vero Beach branches. The Bank’s Operations Center, located in Jensen Beach, Florida opened in March of 2007, and is also leased. The Gatlin Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, Florida branch office opened in May of 2008, and is owned by the Company, with a 50-year ground lease.
There are no material proceedings to which FPB or the Bank is a party or to which any of our properties are subject which are not in the ordinary course of business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Our shareholders voted on no matters during the fourth quarter of 2009.
PART II
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
|
|
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUE PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
As of February 26, 2010, we had approximately 1,400 shareholders. On July 21, 2005, FPB became listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “FPBI.” Prior to that, there was no public market for the stock. The table below shows the high, low and closing bid prices on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the periods indicated. These over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.
|
Calendar Quarter Ended
|
High
|
Low | Closing | |||
|
|
||||||
| March 30, 2007 |
$
|
17.14
|
$ | 15.71 | $ |
16.19
|
| June 30, 2007 | $ |
16.61
|
$ | 14.87 | $ |
15.75
|
| September 30, 2007 | $ |
15.89
|
$ | 12.72 | $ | 13.40 |
| December 31, 2007 |
$
|
13.35
|
$ | 9.71 | $ | 9.80 |
| March 31, 2008 |
$
|
8.66 | $ | 8.25 | $ | 8.66 |
| June 30, 2008 |
$
|
7.21 | $ | 7.21 | $ |
7.21
|
| September 30, 2008 | $ | 5.26 | $ | 5.02 | $ | 5.02 |
| December 31, 2008 | $ | 2.84 | $ | 1.92 | $ | 1.99 |
| March 31, 2009 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 2.50 |
| June 30, 2009 | $ | 2.70 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 2.50 |
| September 30, 2009 | $ | 4.25 | $ | 2.50 | $ | 3.10 |
| December 31, 2009 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.15 |
On June 15, 2007, FPB paid a 5% stock dividend. No dividend was paid in 2009 or 2008.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
FPB hereby incorporates by reference the sections entitled “Selected Financial Data” contained at page 2 of the 2009 Annual Report and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained at pages 3 through 22 of the 2009 Annual Report. The 2009 Annual Report is attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
FPB hereby incorporates by reference the sections entitled “Selected Financial Data” contained at page 2 of the 2009 Annual Report and the section entitled “Consolidated Financial Statements” contained at pages 23 through 57 of the 2009 Annual Report. The 2009 Annual Report is attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Neither FPB nor the Bank has had any disagreements with its accountants.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
FPB maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that FPB files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon their evaluation of those controls and procedures performed within 90 days of the filing date of this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of FPB concluded that FPB’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of FPB’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
(c) Changes in internal controls
FPB made no significant changes in its internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation of those controls by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
FPB experienced no events during the fourth quarter of 2009, which were required to be reported on Form 8-K which were not so reported.
PART III
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information appearing under the headings “Election of Directors” of the definitive Proxy Statement and “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders, scheduled to be held on April 28, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference. None of the officers and directors named in those sections has been involved in any material legal proceedings. We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our executive officers, a copy of which was been filed with our 2005 Form 10-KSB as Exhibit 14. Persons who would like a copy of such code of ethics may receive one without charge upon request made to Nancy E. Aumack, Chief Financial Officer, FPB Bancorp, Inc., 1792 NE Jensen Beach Blvd., Jensen Beach, Florida 34957.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information appearing under the heading “Executive Compensation” of the definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
|
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information appearing under the heading “Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” of the definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIP AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information appearing under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” of the definitive Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information appearing under the caption “Proposal 3.Ratification of the Appointment Of The Independent Auditor for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2010” of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report. The exhibits marked with an (a) were previously filed as a part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1, filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on April 30, 2000; those marked with a (b) were filed with the Company’s From 10-KSB on March 31, 2003; those marked with a (c) were filed with the Company’s Definitive Schedule 14A on October 26, 2005; those marked with a (d) were filed with the Company's Form 8-A on November 16, 2001; those marked with an (e) were filed with the Company's Form 10-QSB/A on August 2, 2008; those marked with an (f) were filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q on November 6, 2008; those marked with a (g) were filed with the Company’s Form 10-KSB on March 28, 2005; those marked with an (h) were filed with the Company’s Form 8-K on December 5, 2008; those marked with an (i) were filed with the Company’s Form S-1 on September 17, 2009; and those marked with a (j) were filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q on November 16, 2009.
(continued)
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
(d)3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation
|
|
(d)3.2
|
Bylaws
|
|
(f) 3.3
|
Amendment to Bylaws
|
|
(d)4.1
|
Specimen copy of certificate evidencing shares of the Company’s common capital stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
(a)4.2
|
First Peoples Bank Stock Option Plan dated January 14, 1999
|
|
(b)4.5
|
Amendment to First Peoples Bank Stock Option Plan
|
|
(c)4.6
|
2005 Stock Compensation Plan
|
|
(a)10.1
|
First Peoples Bank Qualified 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, dated May 1, 1999
|
|
(f)10.2
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for David W. Skiles
|
|
(e)10.3
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement for Nancy E. Aumack
|
|
(e)10.4
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement for Stephen J. Krumfolz
|
|
(e)10.5
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement for Marge Riley
|
|
(h)3.4
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
|
|
(h)4.3
|
Form of Certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A
|
|
(h)4.4
|
Warrant to Purchase Up to 183,158 Shares of Common Stock
|
|
(h)10.6
|
Letter Agreement, dated December 5, 2008 between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury
|
|
(h)10.7
|
Form of Waiver, executed by each of David W. Skiles, Nancy E. Aumack and Marge Riley
|
|
(h)10.8
|
Form of Compliance Agreement, executed by each of David W. Skiles, Nancy E. Aumack
and Marge Riley
|
|
(h)10.9
|
Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury
|
|
(i)21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
(j)3.5
|
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
|
| 13 | |
|
(g)14
|
Code of Ethics
|
| 31.1 | |
| 31.2 | |
| 32.1 | |
| 32.2 |
Financial Statement Schedules. FPB hereby incorporates by reference the sections entitled “Selected Financial Data” contained at page 2 of the 2009 Annual Report and the
section entitled “Consolidated Financial Statements” contained at pages 23 through 57 of the 2009 Annual Report. The 2009 Annual Report is attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FPB BANCORP, INC.
Date: March 12, 2009 By: /s/ David W. Skiles
David W. Skiles
Principal Executive Officer,
President and Director
Date: March 12, 2009 By: /s/ Nancy E. Aumack
Nancy E. Aumack
Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|
/s/ Gary A. Berger
|
Chairman of the Board
|
March 12, 2010
|
||
|
Gary A. Berger
|
||||
|
/s/ Donald J. Cuozzo
|
Director
|
March 15, 2010
|
||
|
Donald J. Cuozzo
|
||||
|
/s/ Ann L. Decker
|
Corporate Secretary and
|
March 12, 2010
|
||
|
Ann L. Decker
|
Director
|
|||
|
/s/ Timothy K. Grimes
|
Director
|
March 15, 2010
|
||
|
Timothy K. Grimes
|
||||
|
/s/ John S. Leighton, III
|
Director
|
March 16, 2010
|
||
|
John S. Leighton, III
|
||||
|
/s/ Paul J. Miret
|
Director
|
March 16, 2010
|
||
|
Paul J. Miret
|
||||
|
/s/ Robert L. Seeley
|
Director
|
March 16, 2010
|
||
|
Robert L. Seeley
|
||||
|
/s/ David W. Skiles
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
March 12, 2010
|
||
|
David W. Skiles
|
President and Director
|
|||
|
/s/ Paul A. Zinter
|
Vice Chairman of the Board
|
March 12, 2010
|
||
|
Paul A. Zinter
|
20