Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv23w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv31w1.htm |
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv21w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv32w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - FURMANITE CORP | d71455exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-5083
FURMANITE CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 74-1191271 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
2435 North Central Expressway | ||
Suite 700 | ||
Richardson, Texas | 75080 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (zip code) |
(972) 699-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, Without Par Value | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates on
June 30, 2009 was $157,086,052 based on the closing price of the registrants common stock, $4.46
per share, reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009.
There were 36,673,852 shares of the registrant common stock outstanding as of March 5, 2010.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement to be furnished to stockholders in connection with its
2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report.
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Item | Page | |||||||
Number | Number | |||||||
3 | ||||||||
PART I |
||||||||
1. | 4 | |||||||
1A. | 7 | |||||||
1B. | 9 | |||||||
2. | 9 | |||||||
3. | 9 | |||||||
4. | 10 | |||||||
PART II |
||||||||
5. | 11 | |||||||
6. | 12 | |||||||
7. | 13 | |||||||
7a. | 28 | |||||||
8. | 28 | |||||||
9. | 28 | |||||||
9a. | 28 | |||||||
9b. | 29 | |||||||
PART III |
||||||||
10. | 30 | |||||||
11. | 30 | |||||||
12. | 30 | |||||||
13. | 30 | |||||||
14. | 30 | |||||||
PART IV |
||||||||
15. | 31 | |||||||
EX-21.1 | ||||||||
EX-23.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this Report) contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included
in this report, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our future financial position,
business strategy, budgets, projected costs, savings and plans, and objectives of management for
future operations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend,
estimate, anticipate, believe or continue or the negative thereof or variations thereon or
similar terminology. The Company bases its forward-looking statements on reasonable beliefs and
assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about itself and its industry. The
Company cautions that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain
risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted. In addition, the Company based many of these
forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate and
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as
of the date of this Report. Unless otherwise required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation
to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise.
3
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
Company Overview
On May 17, 2007, Xanser Corporation changed its name to Furmanite Corporation after the Companys
stockholders ratified the name change at its annual stockholder meeting. The Companys common
stock, no par value, began trading under the ticker symbol FRM effective May 18, 2007, superseding
the previous ticker symbol XNR on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Companys website also
changed from www.xanser.com to www.furmanite.com.
The Company was incorporated in Delaware on January 23, 1953. The Companys principal operating
office is located at 2435 North Central Expressway, Suite 700, Richardson, Texas 75080 and its
telephone number is (972) 699-4000.
Furmanite Corporation (the Parent Company) together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) provides specialized technical services, including leak sealing and hot tapping under
pressure, on-site machining, heat treatment, heat exchanger repair and manufacture, concrete
repair, bolting, valve manufacturing, testing and repair and other engineering products and
services, primarily to electric power generating plants, petroleum refineries and other process
industries in Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific
through Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and its domestic and international subsidiaries and affiliates
(collectively, Furmanite). The Company also provides services to the government contracting
industry through Xtria LLC (Xtria). Xtria offers consulting and other support services to various
federal government agencies. The combination of Furmanite and Xtria are representative of the
operations of the Company.
The Company files annual, quarterly, and other reports and information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These reports and other
information that the Company files with the SEC may be obtained on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
The Company also makes available free of charge on or through the internet website,
www.furmanite.com (select the Financial Reports link under the Investors pull-down menu),
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other
information statements and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable
after the reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Also available on the
Companys website free of charge are copies of the Companys Audit Committee Charter, Compensation
Committee Charter, Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, Code of Ethics and Corporate
Governance Guidelines. The Code of Ethics applies to all of the Companys officers, employees and
directors, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer. A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K will be provided free of charge upon
written request to Investor Relations at the Companys address. Information contained on or
connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be
considered part of the Report or any other filing with the SEC.
4
Table of Contents
Business Segment Data and Geographical Information
See Note 12 under Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Operations
Furmanites business is specialized technical services that are provided to an international base
of clients. Furmanite operations were founded in Virginia Beach, Virginia in the 1920s as a
manufacturer of leak sealing kits. In the 1960s, Furmanite expanded within the United Kingdom,
primarily through its leak sealing products and then into providing services. During the 1970s and
1980s, Furmanite grew through geographic expansion and the addition of new techniques, processes
and services to become one of the largest industrial services companies performing leak sealing and
on-site machining in the world. The Parent Company acquired Furmanite in 1991 to diversify its
operations and pursue international growth opportunities. In 2005, the Company added valve repair
and hot-tapping services to its operations as a result of an asset acquisition, and heat treating
services were introduced in 2006. In 2007, Furmanite expanded its operating presence into Bahrain
and mainland China and in 2008, offices in Canada and West Africa were opened to take advantage of
existing customer relationships in the area and launch the full range of service lines to existing
customers and other markets.
Products and Services
Furmanite provides on-line (under pressure) repairs of leaks (leak sealing) in valves, pipes and other components
of piping systems and related equipment typically used in flow-process industries (see Customers
and Markets below). Other under pressure services provided include hot topping, line stopping, composite repair and valve testing. In addition, the Company provides turnaround services including on-site machining, bolting,
valve repair, heat treating and repair on such systems and equipment. These
services tend to complement leak sealing and other under pressure services since these turnaround services are usually
performed while a plant or piping system is off-line. In addition,
Furmanite provides concrete repair, valve and other product manufacturing, and heat exchanger design and repair. Furmanite also performs diagnostic services on valves by, among other methods,
utilizing its patented Trevitest system. In performing these services, technicians generally work
at the customers location, frequently responding on an emergency basis. Over its history,
Furmanite has established a reputation for delivering quality service and helping its customers
avoid or delay costly plant or equipment shutdowns. For each of the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, under pressure services represented approximately 36%, 32%, and 31%, respectively,
of total revenues, while turnaround and valve repair services accounted for approximately 46%, 54%,
and 54%, respectively, of total revenue and product sales and other industrial services represented
approximately 18%, 14%, and 15%, respectively, of total revenues.
Furmanites on-line, leak sealing under pressure services are performed on a variety of
flow-process industry machinery, often in difficult situations. Many of the techniques and
materials are proprietary and some are patented. Furmanite believes these techniques and materials
provide Furmanite with a competitive advantage over other organizations that provide similar
services. The Company holds approximately 125 trademarks and patents for its techniques, products
and materials and continues to develop new and update existing patents, as it considers these
efforts to be essential to its operations. The patents, which are registered in jurisdictions
around the world, expire at various dates through December 2019. The skilled technicians work with
equipment in a manner designed to enhance safety and efficiency in temperature environments ranging
from cryogenic to 2,400 degrees Fahrenheit and pressure environments ranging from vacuum to 5,000
pounds per square inch. In many circumstances, employees are called upon to custom-design tools,
equipment or other materials to achieve the necessary repairs. These efforts are supported by an
internal quality control group as well as an engineering group and manufacturing group that work
with the on-site technicians in crafting these materials, tools and equipment.
The Company also provides consulting and other support services through Xtria to certain federal
government agencies. Revenues for Xtria represented approximately 1%, 2% and 3% of the Companys
total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
5
Table of Contents
Customers and Markets
Furmanites customer base includes petroleum refineries, chemical plants, mining operations,
offshore energy production platforms, steel mills, nuclear power stations, conventional power
stations, pulp and paper mills, food and beverage processing plants and other flow-process
facilities in more than 50 countries. Most of the revenues are derived from fossil and nuclear fuel
power generation companies, petroleum refiners and chemical producers. Other significant markets
include offshore oil producers, mining operations and steel manufacturers. As the worldwide
industrial infrastructure continues to age, additional repair and maintenance expenditures are
expected to be required for the specialized services provided by Furmanite. Other factors that may
influence the markets served by Furmanite include regulations governing construction of industrial
plants and safety and environmental compliance requirements and the worldwide economic climate. No
single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Companys consolidated revenues during any of
the past three fiscal years.
Furmanite believes that it is the most recognized brand in its industry. With an over 80-year
history, Furmanites customer relationships are long-term and worldwide. All customers are served
from the worldwide headquarters in Richardson, Texas and the Company has a substantial presence in
Europe, including the United Kingdom and Scandinavia, and Asia-Pacific. Furmanite currently
operates North American offices in the United States including Saraland, Alabama; Benicia,
California; Los Angeles, California; Hobart, Indiana; Geismar, Louisiana; Sulphur, Louisiana;
Paulsboro, New Jersey; Charlotte, North Carolina; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Houston, Texas; Salt
Lake City, Utah and Kent, Washington. The worldwide operations are further supported by offices
currently located in countries on six continents in Australia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belgium,
Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Malaysia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway
and Singapore and by licensee and agency arrangements in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Columbia,
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Russia, Thailand,
Trinidad, Tunisia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. Revenues by major geographic region for
2009 were 44% for the United States, 43% for Europe and 13% for Asia-Pacific. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 12 under Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Furmanites leak sealing under pressure and other specialty field services are marketed primarily
through direct sales calls on customers by salesmen and technicians based at the various operating
locations, which are situated to facilitate timely customer response, 24 hours a day and seven days
a week. Customers are usually billed on a time and materials basis for services typically performed
pursuant to either job quotation sheets or purchase orders issued under written customer
agreements. Customer agreements are generally short-term in duration and specify the range of, and
rates for, the services to be performed. Furmanite typically provides various limited warranties,
depending upon the services furnished, and has had no material warranty costs during any of the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007. Furmanite generally competes on the basis of service,
product performance and price on a localized basis with smaller companies and the in-house
maintenance departments of its customers or potential customers. Furmanite believes it currently
has an advantage over in-house maintenance departments because of the ability of its
multi-disciplined technicians to use the proprietary and patented techniques to perform quality
repairs on a timely basis while customer equipment remains in service.
Safety, Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters
Many aspects of Furmanites operations are subject to governmental regulation. Federal, state and
local authorities of the United States and various foreign countries have each adopted safety,
environmental and other regulations relating to the use of certain methods, practices and materials
in connection with the performance of Furmanites services and operations. Further, because of the
international operations, Furmanite is subject to a number of political and economic risks,
including taxation policies, labor practices, currency exchange rate fluctuations, foreign exchange
restrictions, local political conditions, import and export limitations and expropriation of
equipment. Except in certain developing countries, where payment in a specified currency is
required by contract, services are paid and operations are typically funded in the currency of the
particular country in which the business activities are conducted.
Furmanites services are often performed in emergency situations under circumstances involving
exposure to high temperatures and pressures, potential contact with caustic or toxic materials,
fire and explosion hazards and environmental contamination, any of which can cause serious personal
injury or property damage. Furmanite manages its operating risks by providing its technicians with
extensive on-going classroom and field training and
6
Table of Contents
supervision, maintaining a technical support system through its staff of specialists, establishing
and enforcing strict safety and competency requirements, standardizing procedures and evaluating
new materials and techniques for use in connection with the lines of service. Furmanite also
maintains insurance coverage for certain risks, although there is no assurance that insurance
coverage will continue to be available at rates considered reasonable or that the insurance will be
adequate to protect Furmanite against liability or loss of revenues resulting from the consequences
of a significant accident.
Furmanite is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and
various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the Company believes
its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no
assurance that environmental costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover,
it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws,
regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons
resulting from operations of the Company, could result in environmental costs and liabilities to
the Company. The Company has recorded, in other liabilities, an undiscounted reserve for
environmental liabilities related to the remediation of site contamination for properties in the
United States in the amount of $1.3 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in reserves in 2009 resulted from releases obtained on certain
properties during the year.
Employees
At December 31, 2009, the Company had 1,737 employees. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 255
employees were subject to representation by unions or other similar associations for collective
bargaining or other similar purposes, including 195 employees in the United Kingdom who are subject
to a collective bargaining contract. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
In evaluating the Company, the factors described below should be carefully considered. The
occurrence of one or more of these events could materially and adversely affect the Companys
business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Weakness in the industries Furmanite serves could adversely affect demand for our services.
A substantial portion of the business depends upon the levels of capital investment and maintenance
expenditures in the refining and chemical industries, as well as the power generation and other
process industries. The levels of capital and maintenance expenditures by Furmanites customers are
affected by general economic conditions, conditions in their industries and their liquidity, as
well as cyclical downturns in these industries and fluctuations in oil prices. Continued weaknesses
in the sectors served by Furmanite could adversely affect the demand for Furmanites services.
Political conditions in foreign countries in which Furmanite operates could adversely affect the
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow of the Company.
Operations in foreign jurisdictions accounted for approximately 56% of total revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company expects foreign operations to continue to be an important part
of its business. Foreign operations are subject to a variety of risks, such as:
| risks of economic instability; | ||
| potential adverse changes in taxation policies; | ||
| disruptions from labor and political disturbances; | ||
| adverse changes in tariffs or import or export restrictions; | ||
| war or insurrections; and | ||
| other adverse changes in the laws or regulations of the host country. |
7
Table of Contents
The Company may be adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and
foreign exchange restrictions.
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies, which represent a significant portion
of total revenues, and certain costs, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar. The primary foreign currencies of the Company are the Euro, British pound and
Australian dollar. For the year ended December 31, 2009, foreign currency based revenues and
operating income were $155.0 million and $11.4 million, respectively. Based on results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company estimates that a ten percent
fluctuation of all applicable foreign currencies would result in an annual change in revenues and
operating income of $15.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
The competitive position of Furmanite depends in part on the ability to protect its intellectual
property.
The competitive position of Furmanite depends in part upon techniques and materials that are
proprietary and, in some cases, patented. The Company holds approximately 125 trademarks and
patents for its techniques, materials and equipment. These patents are registered around the world
and expire at various dates ranging to 2019. Although Furmanite believes it has taken appropriate
steps to protect the intellectual property from misappropriation, effective protection may be
unavailable or limited in some of the foreign countries. In addition, adequate remedies may not be
available in the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of trade secrets and proprietary
techniques.
Furmanites products and services are offered in highly competitive markets, which limits the
profit margins and the ability to increase market shares.
The markets for Furmanites products and services are highly competitive. Furmanite competes
against large and well established national and international companies as well as regional and
local companies. Furmanite also competes with the in-house maintenance departments of customers or
potential customers. Competition is based on service, performance and price. If Furmanite does not
compete successfully, the business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If the Company loses any key personnel, the ability to manage the business and continue the growth
of the Company could be negatively impacted.
The Companys success is highly dependent on the efforts of its executive officers and key
employees. If any of the Companys key employees leave, its business may suffer. The growth of the
Companys business is also largely dependent upon its ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel in all areas of its business, including management. If the Company is unable to attract
and retain such qualified personnel, it may be forced to limit growth, and its business and
operating results could suffer. Organizational changes within the Company could also impact its
ability to retain personnel.
The Company is exposed to customer credit risks.
The Company is subject to risks of loss resulting from delinquent payment, nonpayment or
nonperformance or other obligations by its customers. If key customers default on their
obligations, the financial results of the Company could be adversely affected. Furthermore, some of
the Companys customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory
risks which may also limit their ability to pay or perform.
Changes in the general economy, including the global financial crisis that began to accelerate in
late 2008 and continued through 2009, may negatively impact the Companys business.
During late 2008 and throughout 2009, a global financial crisis accelerated and has produced a
global recession that may last for an indeterminable period of time. While the timing and extent of
the crisis cannot be predicted, the Company believes that the risks to its business in this
environment has been heightened. Lower levels of liquidity and capital adequacy affecting lenders,
increases in defaults and bankruptcies by customers and suppliers, and volatility in credit and
equity markets could negatively affect the Companys business, operating results, cash flows or
financial condition in a number of ways, including reductions in revenues and profits, increased
bad debts, and financial instability of suppliers and insurers. Furthermore, it may be more
difficult or costly to access or obtain, in the future, working capital or acquisition opportunity
financing.
8
Table of Contents
Climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of greenhouse gases could result
in reduced demand for the Companys services and products.
The adoption and implementation of any regulations which impose limiting emissions of carbon dioxide
and other greenhouse gases from customers for whom the Company provides repair and maintenance
services could adversely affect demand for the Companys products and services. Furthermore, some
scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the Earths
atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased
frequency and severity of storms, droughts, and floods and other climatic events; if any such
effects were to occur in regions where the Company operates, it could have an adverse effect on
the Companys assets and operations.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None
Item 2. | Properties |
The properties owned or utilized by the Company are generally described in Item 1 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Note 4 under Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this
Annual Report on Form
10-K. Additional information concerning the obligations of the Company for lease and rental
commitments is presented under the caption Commitments and Contingencies in Note 11 under Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such descriptions
and information are hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 2.
The Parent Companys corporate headquarters are located in an office building in Richardson, Texas,
pursuant to a lease agreement that expires June 30, 2012 and requires monthly lease payments of
approximately $40,000 plus certain operating expenses and provides for one five-year renewal
period. Functions performed in the corporate headquarters include overall corporate management,
planning and strategy, corporate finance, investor relations, governmental affairs and accounting,
tax, treasury, information technology, legal and human resources support functions. The facilities
used in the operations of the Companys subsidiaries are generally held under lease agreements
having various expiration dates, rental rates and other terms, except for five properties located
in the United Kingdom and five properties located in the United States, which are company-owned.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the
United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the
Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there
can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover, it is
possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations
and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from
operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The Company has
recorded, in other liabilities, an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities related to
the remediation of site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount of $1.3
million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in reserves
in 2009 resulted from releases obtained on certain properties during the year.
Furmanite America, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company is involved in disputes with two customers,
who are each negotiating with a governmental regulatory agency and claim that the subsidiary failed
to provide them with satisfactory services at the customers facilities. On April 17, 2009, a
customer, INEOS USA LLC, initiated legal action against the subsidiary in the Common Pleas Court of
Allen County, Ohio, alleging that the subsidiary, Furmanite America, Inc., and one of its former
employees, who performed data services at one of the customers facilities, breached its contract
with the customer and failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information
supporting the subsidiarys work at the customers facility from 1998 through the second quarter of
2005. The customers complaint seeks damages in an amount that the subsidiary believes represents
the total
9
Table of Contents
proposed civil penalty, plus the cost of unspecified supplemental environmental projects requested
by the regulatory agency to reduce air emissions at the customers facility, and also seeks
unspecified punitive damages. The subsidiary believes that it provided the customer with
adequate and timely information supporting the subsidiarys work at the customers facilities and
will vigorously defend against the customers claim.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35
million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that
the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believes that the sales broker is an affiliate of
another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its
affiliates, against the subsidiary. The action to vacate the arbitration award has terminated and
in January 2010, the subsidiary paid the full amount of the arbitration award plus accrued interest
to the sales broker. In separate pending actions, the subsidiary is seeking to enforce the prior
settlement agreement executed by the sales brokers affiliate and obtain an equitable offset of the
arbitration award.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident
to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the
ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or
determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $3.4
million and $2.4 million are recorded in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Item 4. | Reserved |
10
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
On May 18, 2007, the Companys Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol FRM.
Previously, the Companys Common Stock traded on the NYSE under the symbol XNR.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices per share of the Companys
common stock for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31, | High | Low | ||||||
2009: |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 6.02 | $ | 2.35 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 5.07 | $ | 2.99 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 5.00 | $ | 3.56 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 4.36 | $ | 2.91 | ||||
2008: |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 11.80 | $ | 8.18 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 9.54 | $ | 7.50 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 12.57 | $ | 7.40 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 10.46 | $ | 4.13 |
At March 5, 2010, there were approximately 2,243 stockholders of record.
The Company currently intends to retain future earnings for the development of its business and
does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The
Companys dividend policy is reviewed periodically and determined by its Board of Directors on the
basis of various factors, including, but not limited to, its results of operations, financial
condition, capital requirements and investment opportunities. Additionally, the credit facilities
for the working capital of Furmanite Worldwide, Inc and subsidiaries (FWI) contain restrictions
on its ability to pay dividends or distributions to the Company, if an event of default exists. At
December 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all applicable debt covenants under its
credit facility.
11
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data (in thousands, except per share amounts) is derived from the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 275,940 | $ | 320,942 | $ | 290,287 | $ | 246,388 | $ | 153,881 | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
274,406 | 293,941 | 269,640 | 244,488 | 154,772 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) 1 |
1,534 | 27,001 | 20,647 | 1,900 | (891 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest and other income |
(945 | ) | (1,445 | ) | (2,233 | ) | (1,941 | ) | (380 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
589 | 25,556 | 18,414 | (41 | ) | (1,271 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(3,419 | ) | (3,688 | ) | (5,919 | ) | (3,391 | ) | (2,995 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income 2 |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | $ | (3,432 | ) | $ | (4,266 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) |
1 | Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes restructuring charges of $1.1 million | |
2 | Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes restructuring charges of $0.9 million |
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 36,117 | $ | 30,793 | $ | 31,570 | $ | 23,937 | $ | 21,526 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
79,611 | 83,826 | 76,917 | 69,226 | 57,154 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
174,989 | 173,278 | 172,053 | 156,500 | 136,478 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
30,139 | 35,363 | 43,185 | 48,721 | 31,739 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
85,330 | 91,317 | 78,336 | 60,605 | 51,304 | |||||||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Business Overview
On May 17, 2007, Xanser Corporation changed its name to Furmanite Corporation after the Companys
stockholders ratified the name change at its annual stockholder meeting. The Companys common
stock, no par value, began trading under the ticker symbol FRM effective May 18, 2007, superseding
the previous ticker symbol XNR, on the NYSE.
The Company was incorporated in 1953 and conducts its principal business through subsidiaries in
the technical services industry.
The Parent Company together with the Company provides specialized technical services, including
leak sealing and hot tapping under pressure, on-site machining, heat treatment, heat exchanger
repair and manufacture, concrete repair, bolting, valve manufacturing, testing and repair and other
engineering products and services, primarily to electric power generating plants, petroleum
refineries and other process industries in Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East,
Africa and Asia-Pacific through Furmanite. The Company also provides consulting and other support
services to various federal government agencies through Xtria.
The combination of Furmanite and Xtria are representative of the operations of the Company.
Financial Overview
The Company recorded a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 of ($2.8) million, a decrease
of $24.7 million, or 112.9% compared to $21.9 million of net income for the year ended December 31,
2008. While the Company experienced favorable conditions in many of its service lines through the
first half of 2008, softening demand in the industries in which the Company operates was
experienced in late 2008 and continued throughout 2009, resulting in reduced revenues due to
deferral or cancellation of projects, primarily in turnaround services. The effects of the lower
demand in the marketplace, combined with competitive pricing in the industry and an unfavorable
foreign currency impact of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 contributed to the
unfavorable change compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company
committed to a cost reduction initiative in the fourth quarter of 2009 in order to more favorably
align its selling, general and administrative costs with its current level of operations. The costs
of this initiative negatively impacted operating income and net income by $1.1 million and $0.9
million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Companys diluted loss per share
for the year ended December 31, 2009 was ($0.08) compared to $0.59 diluted earnings per share for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
13
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 275,940 | $ | 320,942 | $ | 290,287 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
187,269 | 207,748 | 187,055 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
5,995 | 5,784 | 4,772 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
81,142 | 80,409 | 77,813 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
274,406 | 293,941 | 269,640 | |||||||||
Operating income |
1,534 | 27,001 | 20,647 | |||||||||
Interest income and other income (expense), net |
434 | 260 | 1,041 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,379 | ) | (1,705 | ) | (3,274 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
589 | 25,556 | 18,414 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
(3,419 | ) | (3,688 | ) | (5,919 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.35 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.35 |
14
Table of Contents
Geographical information
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 121,642 | $ | 147,045 | $ | 128,316 | ||||||
Europe |
119,211 | 141,716 | 130,724 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
35,087 | 32,181 | 31,247 | |||||||||
Total Revenue |
275,940 | 320,942 | 290,287 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
||||||||||||
United States |
82,703 | 97,274 | 86,313 | |||||||||
Europe |
84,048 | 91,525 | 83,276 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
20,518 | 18,949 | 17,466 | |||||||||
Total operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amoritization) |
187,269 | 207,748 | 187,055 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
||||||||||||
United States, including corporate |
3,278 | 3,348 | 2,583 | |||||||||
Europe |
1,661 | 1,544 | 1,495 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
1,056 | 892 | 694 | |||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization expense |
5,995 | 5,784 | 4,772 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
||||||||||||
United States, including corporate |
45,838 | 45,758 | 44,762 | |||||||||
Europe |
28,608 | 27,957 | 26,962 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
6,696 | 6,694 | 6,089 | |||||||||
Total selling general and administrative expense |
81,142 | 80,409 | 77,813 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
$ | 274,406 | $ | 293,941 | $ | 269,640 |
Geographical areas are the United States, Europe (which also includes operations of the United
Kingdoms subsidiaries in the Middle East and Africa) and Asia-Pacific. The following discussion
and analysis, as it relates to geographic information, excludes any allocation of headquarter costs
to Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Revenues
For the year ended December 31, 2009, consolidated revenues decreased by $45.0 million, or 14.0%,
to $275.9 million, compared to $320.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Changes related
to foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenues by $16.8 million, of which $15.2
million and $1.6 million were related to unfavorable impacts from Europe and Asia-Pacific,
respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, revenues decreased by $28.2
million, or 8.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period for the prior
year. This $28.2 million decrease in revenues consisted of a $25.4 million decrease in the United
States and a $7.3 million decrease in Europe, partially offset by a $4.5 million increase in
Asia-Pacific. The decrease in revenues in the United States was primarily due to reduced volumes of
turnaround services, including heat treating, valve repair services, and bolting of approximately
24% when compared to revenues in the same period for the prior year. The decrease in revenues in
Europe was primarily attributable to a decrease in turnaround services of approximately 16%, which
included volume decreases in bolting, on-site machining, and valve repairs when compared to
revenues in the same period for the prior year. The increase in revenues in Asia-Pacific was
primarily attributable to increases in underpressure services in Singapore which included volume
increases in hot tapping services. These increases were partially offset by decreases in turnaround
services in Australia, primarily volume decreases in on-site machining due to softening in the
mining industry in the first half of 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, consolidated revenues increased by $30.6 million, or 10.6%,
when compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Changes related to foreign currency exchange
rates unfavorably impacted revenue by $0.8 million, of which $1.8 million was related to an
unfavorable impact from Europe, which
15
Table of Contents
was partially offset by a $1.0 million favorable impact from
Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, revenue increased $31.4 million,
or 10.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $31.4
million increase in revenue consisted of an $18.7 million increase from the United States and $12.8
million increase from Europe that was slightly offset by a $0.1 million decrease from Asia-Pacific.
A majority of the increase in the United States was due to volume increases in heat treatment
services which more
than doubled when compared to prior year revenues due to continued expansion of this service line,
which was introduced in late 2006. In addition, under pressure services increased approximately
10% over the prior year, primarily related to volume increases in leak sealing services. The
revenue growth in the United States in 2008 was mitigated to some extent by a disruption in
business related to the shutdown of facilities in the Gulf Coast for nearly a month due to
hurricanes in the region. While the extent of the impact cannot be quantified, scheduled and
anticipated business was delayed or cancelled as a result of the shutdowns during this period. The
increase in Europe was related to the increases in both underpressure and turnaround services which
included volume increases in bolting and onsite machining of approximately 30% when compared to
prior year revenues, as well as volume increases due to the expansion of the Companys heat
treatment services which were introduced in Europe in early 2008. Revenues in Asia-Pacific remained
relatively flat across product lines but decreased slightly due to the completion of some larger
contracts in 2007 which did not recur in 2008.
Operating Costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
For the year ended December 31, 2009, operating costs decreased $20.4 million, or 9.8%, to $187.3
million, compared to $207.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The change related to
foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted costs by $10.2 million, of which $9.2 million
and $1.0 million were related to favorable impacts from Europe and Asia-Pacific, respectively.
Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, operating costs decreased $10.2 million, or
4.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same period for the prior year. This
$10.2 million decrease in operating costs consisted of a $14.5 million decrease in the United
States, partially offset by a $1.7 million increase in Europe and a $2.6 million increase in
Asia-Pacific. The decrease in operating costs in the United States was attributable to lower
salaries and related benefit costs of approximately 15% when compared to the same period for the
prior year, consistent with the decrease in revenue. In addition, other costs including equipment
rental, vehicle costs, supplies and materials and travel costs decreased by approximately 8% as a
result of the decline in revenues. The increase in Europe was due to increased labor and material
costs, as well as costs associated with the expansion of operations in the Middle East and Africa.
The increase in operating costs in Asia-Pacific was attributable to an increase in labor and
equipment costs associated with the increased activities in the region, especially in Singapore.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, operating costs increased $20.7 million, or 11.0%, when
compared to the year ended December 30, 2007. The change related to foreign currency exchange rates
favorably impacted operating costs by $0.1 million, of which $0.7 million was related to a
favorable impact from Europe which was partially offset by a $0.6 million unfavorable impact from
Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, operating costs increased $20.8
million, or 11.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This
$20.8 million increase in operating costs consisted of an $11.0 million increase in the United
States, an $8.9 million increase in Europe and $0.9 million increase for Asia-Pacific. Over half of
the increase in the United States was due to a 13% increase in labor and benefit costs, directly
correlating with the increase in revenues. Additionally, other costs including travel costs,
supplies and materials, equipment rental, equipment repairs and maintenance and vehicle costs
increased 6%, when compared to prior year costs, in support of the increase in revenues. The
increase in Europe was primarily due to an 18% increase in labor and benefit costs, when compared
to prior year costs, and to a lesser extent increases in travel costs, equipment repairs and
maintenance associated with the increase in revenue. The increase in Asia Pacific was primarily due
to increases in labor and benefit costs, which increased approximately 13% when compared to prior
year costs, associated with expansion into the region.
Operating costs as a percentage of revenue were 67.9% and 64.7% for the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The percentage of operating costs to revenues was higher for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period for the prior year as the result of an
unfavorable change in service mix, lower absorption of fixed costs due to the decrease in revenues,
a lower utilization rate of labor and more competitive pricing in the market during the current
year. Lower labor utilization rates were attributable to a combination of the decreased industrial
activity and the Companys decision to retain qualified, experienced technical personnel in order
to maintain the necessary expertise and capacity to meet customer needs currently and as market
conditions improve.
16
Table of Contents
Operating costs as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
consistent at 64.7% and 64.4%, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2009, depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.2 million,
or 3.6%, when compared to the same periods for the prior year. The change related to foreign
currency exchange rates favorably impacted depreciation and amortization expense by $0.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact,
depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was slightly higher than
the same period for the prior year, based on capital expenditures of approximately $6.5 million
over the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.0 million,
or 21.2%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to the
depreciation and amortization related to the $8.1 million of depreciable capital assets placed in
service in 2007 and to a lesser degree the $8.1 million of capital assets placed in service during
the year ended December 31, 2008 associated with the expansions into new markets and new service
lines, as well as additional capital on existing service lines and upgrades to the Companys global
financial data system.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2009, selling, general and administrative expenses increased
slightly by $0.7 million, or 0.9%, to $81.1 million compared to $80.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The change related to foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted costs
by $3.5 million, of which $3.0 million and $0.5 million were related to favorable impacts in Europe
and Asia-Pacific, respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate differences, selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $4.2 million, or 5.2%, for the year ended December
31, 2009, compared to the same period for the prior year. This $4.2 million increase in selling,
general and administrative costs consisted of a $0.1 million increase in the United States, a $3.7
million increase in Europe and a $0.4 million increase in Asia-Pacific. The United States increase
in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of an increase in salaries and
related benefit costs of approximately 7% when compared to 2008 due to additional sales force and
associated benefit costs added in late 2008 and early 2009. This increase was substantially offset
by decreases in other costs, which included decreases in travel costs and professional fees. The
increase in Europe was primarily attributable to expanded activities in the Middle East and Africa
as well as an increase in salaries and related benefits costs also related to an increase in sales
force. The increase in Asia-Pacific was attributable to general cost increases associated with the
increase in revenue level.
The Companys increase in sales force began in the second half of 2008 and carried forward into
early 2009 in an effort to maintain or increase revenues and market share while facing a downturned
economy. Results of this increase, specifically in the United States and Europe, did not have the
expected outcome and this, combined with the continued unfavorable impact on the Companys
operations as a result of the economic downturn, resulted in the Companys decision to undertake a
cost reduction initiative in late 2009 to realign selling, general and administrative costs with
its current level of operations. The ongoing initiative will initially result in additional
severance and consolidation costs, but will reduce ongoing expense levels. As a result of the
initiative, restructuring costs were incurred during the fourth quarter and will extend through
2010 with a majority of the costs expected to be recognized by the first quarter of 2010.
Restructuring costs incurred in 2009 totaled $1.1 million of which $0.4 million and $0.7 million
were incurred in the United States and Europe, respectively, with only minimal restructuring costs
incurred in Asia-Pacific. The costs incurred in 2009 were primarily related to severance and
related costs of $0.9 million, lease termination costs of $22.0 thousand and other restructuring
costs of $0.2 million. Restructuring costs in 2010 are expected to total approximately $2.3 million
of which $1.2 million are expected for severance and related costs, $0.6 million for lease
termination costs and $0.5 million for other restructuring costs. Of these estimated costs, $0.3
million are expected in the United States and $2.0 million are expected in Europe.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.6
million, or 3.3%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The change related to foreign
currency exchange rates favorably impacted costs by $0.1 million, of which $0.2 million related to
a favorable impact from Europe which
17
Table of Contents
was partially offset by a $0.1 million unfavorable impact in
Asia-Pacific. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $2.7 million, or 3.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. In the United States, Europe and Asia-Pacific, selling,
general and administrative costs increased by $1.0 million, $1.2 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. In the United States the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
due to a 32% increase in sales labor and
benefit costs when compared to 2007. This increase, coupled with increases in vehicle costs and
rent expense, supported the increase in revenue. There were also slight increases in bad debt
expense as a result of the global economic conditions. The increase in Europe also represented
increased sales labor and benefit costs of approximately 36% when compared with 2007. These
increases were incurred in support of the increased revenues as well anticipated future growth
within the locations. The increase in Asia-Pacific was associated with a 5% increase in sales and
administrative labor and benefit costs, when compared with 2007, as well as additional rent expense
due to expansion into the region.
Interest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2009, consolidated interest expense decreased by $0.3 million when
compared to the same period for the prior year. The decrease in interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was due to a decrease in average outstanding debt and interest rates for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, consolidated interest expense decreased by $1.6 million, or
47.9%, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in interest expense is due
to the conversion and payoff of the Companys 8.75% subordinated debentures which matured January
2008, as well as a decrease in outstanding debt and in interest rates from December 31, 2007 to
December 31, 2008. During 2008, payments on debt totaled $8.0 million. During 2007, $3.0 million of
the debentures were converted into 562,628 shares of the Companys common stock and $1.9 million of
the debentures were converted into 358,344 shares of the Companys common stock during the first
half of January 2008. The remaining $0.2 million of subordinated debentures matured and were paid
in full in January 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company maintains a valuation allowance to adjust the basis of net deferred tax assets in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC 740) Income Taxes. As a result, substantially all net deferred tax assets attributable to
U.S. federal income taxes, as well as certain state and foreign income taxes, recorded for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were fully reserved. The income tax expense recorded
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 consisted primarily of income taxes due in
foreign and state jurisdictions of the Company.
Income tax expense differs from the expected tax at statutory rates due primarily to the change in
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and different tax rates in the various foreign
jurisdictions. Additionally, the aggregate tax expenses are not consistent when comparing periods
due to the changing income tax mix between domestic and foreign operations and within the foreign
operations. In concluding that a full valuation allowance on domestic federal and certain state and
foreign income taxes was required, the Company primarily considered factors such as the history of
operating losses and the nature of the deferred tax assets.
Income tax expense as a percentage of income before taxes increased to 580.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from 14.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Income tax expense as a
percentage of income before taxes decreased to 14.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from
32.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The change in the rates is related to changes in the
mix of taxable income, between countries whose taxes are offset by full valuation allowances and
those that are not. The income generated in certain foreign countries is taxable in 2009, while
losses in the U.S. and certain other foreign countries is not tax effected. This, along with the
low level of pre-tax income, resulted in an extremely high effective tax rate in 2009.
The most significant factor impacting the variability in tax rates relates to foreign currency
transaction gains and losses. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Companys United Kingdom
subsidiary recognized approximately $3.5 million of foreign currency transaction gains compared to
approximately $7.4 million in foreign
18
Table of Contents
currency transaction losses for the year ended December 31,
2008, primarily related to U.S. dollar denominated notes outstanding under the Companys previous
credit agreement. During these same periods, U.S.-based subsidiaries of the Company recognized
foreign currency transaction losses in 2009 and gains in 2008 substantially offsetting the impact
of the currency transaction gains and losses in the United Kingdom, however income tax expenses and
benefits in the United Kingdom related to these gains and losses were not offset as the U.S.
transaction
gains and losses had no tax effect due to the aforementioned valuation allowance on the Companys
U.S. federal taxes.
As noted in the following Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion, the Company terminated its
previous credit agreement and replaced it with a new credit agreement in 2009. The Company
eliminated the foreign currency translation exposure which was inherent in the previous credit
facility through the structuring of the new credit facility, and as a result has significantly
reduced its foreign currency exposure, as well as any related income tax impacts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys liquidity and capital resources requirements include the funding of working capital
needs, the funding of capital investments and the financing of internal growth.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase of $1.4 million in net
cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to changes in working capital accounts of
$26.9 million partially offset by a decrease in net income of $24.7 million, when compared to the
year ended December 31, 2008. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven
by accounts receivable changes that increased cash flows by $13.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to a decrease of approximately $5.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2008. This change was a result of the decrease in revenues in the current year compared to the
year ended December 31, 2008, combined with improved collection efforts on accounts receivable. In
addition, income taxes payable increased cash flow by $2.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 compared to an decrease of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This change was
due to timing of estimated payments made on current year tax liabilities combined with refunds
received in the current year on prior year overpayments, primarily in the United Kingdom.
Net cash used in investing activities was $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The change was a result of lower
levels of capital expenditures in the current year verses prior year levels. Expenditures totaled
$6.5 million and $8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In
addition, $0.9 million of payments were made in the current year related to the acquisition of
assets and $0.4 million of proceeds were received from the sale of property and equipment in the
ordinary course of business.
Consolidated capital expenditures for the calendar year 2010 have been budgeted at $9.0 to $11.0
million. Such expenditures, however, will depend on many factors beyond the Companys control,
including, without limitation, demand for services as well as domestic and foreign government
regulations. No assurance can be given that required capital expenditures will not exceed
anticipated amounts during 2010 or thereafter. Capital expenditures during the year are expected to
be funded from existing cash and anticipated cash flows from operations.
Net cash used in financing activities was $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in cash used for
financing activities resulted from net principal payments made on the Companys credit facility
totaling $5.0 million and debt issuance cost payments on a new credit facility of $0.6 million in
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $7.5 million of principal payments made on its credit
facility and $0.1 million of payments made related to the final conversions of the Companys
convertible subordinated debentures in the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company entered into a
new credit facility in 2009 (described in more detail below), receiving borrowings of $35.0 million
from the new facility, and paid its remaining outstanding principal balance of $35.1 million upon
the termination of the previous credit facility.
19
Table of Contents
During the latter part of 2008 and throughout 2009, a global financial crisis has continued and has
resulted in a global recession, the duration of which is indeterminable. The ultimate timing and
extent of the crisis cannot be predicted, and as such, the Company believes that the risks to its
business in this environment remain heightened. Lower levels of liquidity and capital adequacy
affecting lenders, increases in defaults and bankruptcies by customers and suppliers, and
volatility in credit and equity markets could continue to negatively affect the Companys
business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition in a number of ways, including
reductions in revenues and profits, increased bad debts and financial instability of suppliers and
insurers.
In 2005, Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (FWI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Parent Company, entered into the Second Amendment to its Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated
August 11, 2002, with the Bank of Scotland (the previous loan agreement). Pursuant to the Second
Amendment, the Bank of Scotland increased the revolving credit commitment under the original Loan
Agreement from $25.0 million to $50.0 million in connection with an acquisition by the Company. FWI
funded the cost of the acquisition and certain related transaction costs by borrowing an additional
$15.6 million under the $50.0 million revolving bank facility (the $50.0 million facility). At
December 31, 2008, $27.6 million was outstanding under the $50.0 million facility which consisted
of amounts borrowed by the Company for working capital needs. Borrowings under the $50.0 million
facility bore interest at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate, at the
option of the borrower) which were 3.5% at December 31, 2008.
During 2006, $15.0 million, secured by a letter of credit, was borrowed under the $50.0 million
facility (the $15.0 million facility) that provided for working capital. The proceeds were used
to repay earlier borrowings outstanding under the $50.0 million facility and for working capital
purposes. At December 31, 2008, there was $7.5 million outstanding under the $15.0 million
facility. Borrowings under the $15.0 million facility bore interest
at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate, at the option of the borrower) which were 2.7% at December 31,
2008.
The previous loan agreement contained certain financial and operational covenants and was without
recourse to the Parent Company. Total outstanding borrowings under the previous loan agreement were
$35.1 million at December 31, 2008.
On August 4, 2009, FWI and certain foreign subsidiaries (the designated borrowers) of FWI entered
into a new credit agreement dated July 31, 2009 with Bank of America, N.A. (the existing credit
agreement). The existing credit agreement, which matures on January 31, 2013, provides a revolving
credit facility of up to $50.0 million. A portion of the amount available under the existing credit
agreement (not in excess of $20.0 million) is available for the issuance of letters of credit. In
addition, a portion of the amount available under the existing credit agreement (not in excess of
$5.0 million in the aggregate) is available for swing line loans to FWI. The loans outstanding
under the existing credit agreement may not exceed $35.0 million in the aggregate to the designated
borrowers.
The proceeds from the initial borrowing on the existing credit agreement were $35.0 million and
were used to repay the amounts outstanding under the previous loan agreement, which was scheduled
to mature in January 2010, at which time the previous loan agreement was terminated by the Company.
Letters of credit issued from the previous loan agreement were replaced with similar letters of
credit by the existing credit agreement. There were no material circumstances surrounding the
termination and no material early termination penalties were incurred by FWI.
At December 31, 2009, $30.0 million was outstanding under the existing credit agreement. Borrowings
under the existing credit agreement bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates
(based on the prime rate, federal funds rate or Eurocurrency rate, including a margin above such
rates, and subject to an adjustment based on a calculated funded debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined
in the existing credit agreement)) which were 2.5% at December 31, 2009. The existing credit
agreement contains a commitment fee which ranges between 0.25% to 0.30% based on the funded debt to
EBITDA ratio, and was 0.25% at December 31, 2009, based on the unused portion of the amount
available under the existing credit agreement. All obligations under the existing credit agreement
are guaranteed by FWI and certain of its subsidiaries under a guaranty and collateral agreement,
and are secured by a first priority lien on certain of FWI and its subsidiaries assets (which
approximates $118.5 million of current assets and property and equipment as of December 31, 2009)
and is without recourse to the Parent Company. FWI is subject to certain compliance provisions
including, but not limited to, maintaining certain funded debt and fixed charge coverage ratios,
tangible asset concentration levels, and capital expenditure limitations as well as
20
Table of Contents
restrictions on
indebtedness, guarantees and other contingent obligations and transactions. Events of default under
the existing credit agreement include customary events, such as change of control, breach of
covenants or breach of representations and warranties. At December 31, 2009, FWI was in compliance
with all covenants under the existing credit agreement.
Considering the outstanding borrowings of $30.0 million, and $3.5 million related to outstanding
letters of credit, the unused borrowing capacity under the existing credit agreement was $16.5
million at December 31, 2009, with a limit of $5.0 million of this capacity remaining for the
designated borrowers.
During January 2008, $1.9 million of the Companys remaining 8.75% convertible subordinated
debentures were converted, at the option of the holder, into 358,344 shares of the Companys common
stock, at a conversion price of $5.26 per share. The remaining subordinated debentures matured
January 15, 2008 and a final principal and interest payment of $0.2 million was made at that time.
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its
pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the Distribution) to its stockholders in
the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (KSL). On June 29, 2001, the
Distribution was completed, with each shareholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL
for each three shares of the Companys common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the
Distribution, resulting in the distribution of approximately 10,850,000 KSL common shares. Pursuant
to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the Distribution Agreement) with KSL,
whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities
incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also
requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the
Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax
from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the
extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or
(ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSLs common shares and the operations of KSLs
businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal
or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination,
administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has
agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSLs
obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued
income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both
reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax
exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in
2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses
distributed to common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
The Company does not anticipate paying any dividends as it believes investing earnings back into
the Company will provide a better long-term return to stockholders in increased per share value.
The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and
available credit under existing debt facilities, will be sufficient to finance current operations,
planned capital expenditure requirements and internal growth for the foreseeable future.
21
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents (in thousands) the long-term contractual obligations of the Company as
of December 31, 2009 in total and by period due beginning in 2010. The operating leases contain
renewal options by the Company that are not reflected in the table below. The Company anticipates
that these renewal options will likely be exercised.
Less Than 1 | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Year | 1 - 3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under existing revolving credit facility |
$ | 30,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 30,000 | $ | | ||||||||||
Capital leases |
313 | 174 | 111 | 28 | | |||||||||||||||
Debt subtotal |
30,313 | 174 | 111 | 30,028 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest on debt |
3,012 | 759 | 1,503 | 750 | | |||||||||||||||
Total debt and interest |
33,325 | 933 | 1,614 | 30,778 | | |||||||||||||||
Other contractual commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
24,149 | 7,473 | 9,929 | 3,514 | 3,233 | |||||||||||||||
Pension plan contributions |
11,350 | 1,135 | 2,270 | 2,270 | 5,675 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
10,000 | 500 | 4,000 | 5,500 | | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations1 |
690 | 690 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total other contractual commitments |
46,189 | 9,798 | 16,199 | 11,284 | 8,908 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 79,514 | $ | 10,731 | $ | 17,813 | $ | 42,062 | $ | 8,908 | ||||||||||
1 | Accrued restructuring costs |
Interest on debt is calculated based on outstanding balances, using interest rates in effect
at December 31, 2009. Estimated annual defined benefit pension plan contributions are assumed to
be consistent with the current expected contribution level of $1.2 million.
In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10-65 (FASB Interpretation No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, income tax liabilities are not included
in the above contractual obligations. At December 31, 2009, the Companys gross liability for
uncertainty in income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-65 was $1.0 million. The Company cannot determine
a reliable estimate of the timing of cash flows by period related to its FASB ASC 740-10-65
liability. However, should the entire FASB ASC 740-10-65 liability be paid, the amount of the
payment may be partially reduced as a result of offsetting benefits in other tax jurisdictions. See
Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional information regarding FASB ASC
740-10-65.
740-10-65.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) promulgated
by FASB, its predecessors, and others as of June 30, 2009, as well as future authoritative
accounting principles, are set forth in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Codification). Future references to U.S. GAAP will be to the Codification number, rather than to
literature numbers and titles such as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards numbers and
titles. A basic overview of the codification is available on the Internet without charge at
www.fasb.org where the codification is explained at FASB ASC 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
The preparation of the Companys financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Significant policies are presented in Note 1. under Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
22
Table of Contents
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Companys
financial position and results of operations. These policies require managements most difficult,
subjective or complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain. The Companys critical accounting policies and estimates, for which
no significant changes have occurred except for restructuring accrual for the year ended December
31, 2009, include revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill, intangible assets
and long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, income taxes, defined benefit pension plan and
contingencies. Critical accounting policies are discussed by management regularly, at least
quarterly, with the Companys Audit Committee.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended by SAB No. 104,
Revenue Recognition.
Revenues are based primarily on time and materials. Substantially all projects are generally short
term in nature. Revenues are recognized when services to customers have been rendered or when
products are shipped and risk of ownership is passed to the customer. The Company provides limited
warranties to customers, depending upon the service performed. Warranty claim costs were not
material during any of the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Revenues under long-term service contracts, generally greater than six months, are accounted for
using a proportional performance method or on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes
revenues on a proportional basis when a contract consists of milestones or activities that are
process-related and has no other material deliverables. The Company recognizes revenues on a
straight-line basis when billing terms and performance of the contract are substantially equivalent
throughout the life of the contract. Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
using the proportional method were not significant. The Company records revenues net of sales tax.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Credit is extended to customers based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and
generally collateral is not required. Accounts receivable outstanding longer than contractual
payment terms are considered past due. The Company regularly evaluates and adjusts accounts
receivable as doubtful based on a combination of write-off history, aging analysis and information
available on specific accounts. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become
uncollectible. Any payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance
in the period the payment is received.
Goodwill, Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of
FASB ASC 350 Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. Under FASB ASC 350, intangible assets with lives restricted by
contractual, legal or other means are amortized over their useful lives. At December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company had no significant intangible assets subject to amortization under FASB ASC 350.
Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually
(in the fourth quarter of each calendar year), or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Examples of such events or circumstances
include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action
or assessment by a regulator, or a loss of key personnel.
FASB ASC 350 requires a two-step process for testing goodwill impairment. First, the fair value of
each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication of
impairment exists. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment
(referred to as a component). Two or more components of an operating segment shall be aggregated
and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. The
Company has two reporting units, Furmanite and Xtria for the purpose of testing
23
Table of Contents
goodwill
impairment, as the operating results of these components are reviewed separately by management and
cannot be aggregated. All goodwill of the Company relates to Furmanite, accordingly, impairment of
goodwill is tested for that reporting unit. Second, if an impairment is indicated, the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill is determined by allocating the units fair value to its
assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had
been acquired in a business combination. The amount of impairment for goodwill and other intangible
assets is measured as the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value.
The Company uses market capitalization as the basis for its measurement of fair value, and
reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units to the enterprise market
capitalization. Management considers this approach the most meaningful measure as substantially all
of the Companys fair value is attributable to the Furmanite reporting unit and the quoted market
price provides the best evidence of fair value. In performing the reconciliation, the Company uses
the stock price on December 31 of each year as the valuation date. On December 31, 2009,
Furmanites fair value substantially exceeded its carrying value.
Based on valuations and market approach analysis performed by the Company at December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, no impairment was indicated. Future evaluations of the fair value of goodwill and
other intangible assets are dependent on many factors, several of which are out of the Companys
control, including the demand for services provided and the potential impact of the uncertain
global economic condition. To the extent that such factors or conditions change, it is possible
that future impairments could occur, which could have a material effect on the results of
operations of the Company. At each of December 31, 2009 and 2008, $2.1 million, of indefinite-lived
intangible assets (primarily tradenames) were included in other assets on the consolidated balance
sheets. Gross finite-lived intangible assets of $1.3 million and $0.3 million were also included in
other assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 with accumulated amortization of $0.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively. Amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets totaled $0.1 million and $23 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, future amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets
subject to amortization is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):
2009 | ||||
Fiscal Year: |
||||
2010 |
$ | 195 | ||
2011 |
194 | |||
2012 |
194 | |||
2013 |
194 | |||
2014 |
119 | |||
Thereafter |
122 | |||
Total |
$ | 1,018 | ||
The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets subject to amortization is
approximately 5.7 years.
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 360 (SFAS
No. 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under FASB ASC 360, the
Company reviews long-lived assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and property and
equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets
are no longer appropriate. Factors that may affect recoverability include changes in planned use of
equipment, closing of facilities and discontinuance of service lines. Property and equipment to be
held and used is reviewed at least annually for possible impairment. The Companys impairment
review is based on an estimate of the undiscounted cash flow at the lowest level for which
identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset and the impairment is viewed as
other than temporary. When impairment is indicated, an impairment charge is recorded for the
difference between the carrying value of the asset and its fair market value. Depending on the
asset, fair market value may be determined either by use of a discounted cash flow model or by
reference to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition. No impairment of long-lived
assets was recorded during 2009, 2008, or 2007.
24
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
All stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense in the financial statements and such costs
are measured at the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock-based
payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the Black-Scholes model is affected by the
Companys stock price on the date of the grant as well as other assumptions. Assumptions utilized
in the fair value calculations include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards (estimated using the historical volatility of the Companys stock price), the risk free
interest rate (based on the U.S. Treasury Note rate over the expected term of the option), the
dividend yield (assumed to be zero, as the Company has not paid, nor anticipates paying, any cash
dividends), and employee stock option exercise behavior and forfeiture assumptions (based on
historical experience and other relevant factors).
Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10-65, (FASB Interpretation No. 48), Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007.
The adoption of FASB ASC 740-10-65 had no net impact on the Companys tax reserves during 2007.
Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax
rate because unrecognized non-current tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss
carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments
of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of
the income tax provision. The Company incurred no significant interest or penalties for any of the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009 and
2008 were $1.0 million for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and
would impact
the effective foreign tax rate if recognized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the U.S. GAAP and tax
treatment of certain income and expense items. The Company must assess and make estimates regarding
the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered. To the extent that it is determined
the deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance must be established for such
assets. In making such a determination, the Company must take into account positive and negative
evidence including projections of future taxable income and assessments of potential tax planning
strategies. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys valuation allowance was $20.7 million and
$17.6 million, respectively. The net deferred tax assets in 2009 and 2008 relate to foreign and
certain state tax items.
The Company and its subsidiaries file numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the
United States as well as various foreign jurisdictions. The Companys U.S. federal income tax
returns for 2006 and subsequent years remain subject to examination. Additionally, net operating
loss carryforwards originating in years prior to 2006 could be subject to examination to the extent
of the loss carryforwards. All material foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years
through 2004.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Pension benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such
amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, expected investment return
on plan assets, mortality rates and retirement rates. The discount rate assumption used to
determine end of year benefit obligations was 5.7%. These rates are renewed annually and adjusted
to reflect current conditions. Based on this information the discount rate for 2010 is 5.7%. These
rates are determined based on reference to yields. The compensation increase rate of 4.0% per year
is based on historical experience. The expected return on plan assets of 6.8% for 2010 is derived
from detailed periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated
future long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks (standard deviations) and
correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans asset mix. While the
studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns, the
assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return. Mortality and retirement rates
are based on actual and anticipated plan experience. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results
that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore,
generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While management
believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in
assumptions may affect pension and postretirement obligation and future expense. The effect of a
0.5% increase in the discount rate would result in a $0.4 million decrease on the 2010
25
Table of Contents
estimated
pension expense while a 0.5% decrease in the discount rate would result in a $0.5 million increase
on the
2010 estimated pension expense. An increase of 0.5% in the discount rate would result in a $4.7
million decrease on the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2009 while a decrease of 0.5%
in the discount rate would result in a $5.2 million increase on the projected benefit obligation at
December 31, 2009.
Contingencies
Environmental
Liabilities are recorded when site restoration or environmental remediation and cleanup obligations
are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of
environmental costs through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources are recognized when such recoveries become certain.
The Company capitalizes environmental costs only if the costs are recoverable and the costs extend
the life, increase the capacity, or improve the safety or efficiency of property owned by the
Company as compared with the condition of that property when originally constructed or acquired, or
if the costs mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur and that
otherwise may result from future operations or activities and the costs improve the property
compared with its condition when constructed or acquired. All other environmental costs are
expensed.
Other
The Company establishes a liability for all other loss contingencies, when information indicates
that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Restructuring Accrual
On December 29, 2009, the Company committed to a cost reduction initiative, including planned
workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions. The Company has taken these specific
actions in order to more favorably align its selling, general and administrative costs with its
current level of operations. The Company expects to complete these cost reduction actions during
2010, with the majority of expense recognized in the first quarter of 2010.
In connection with this plan, the Company has recorded estimated expenses for severance, lease
cancellations, and other restructuring costs in accordance with FASB ASC 420-10, Exit or Disposal
Cost Obligations. Under FASB ASC 420-10, costs associated with restructuring activities are
generally recognized when they are incurred. In the case of leases, the expense is estimated and
accrued when the property is vacated. In addition, post-employment benefits accrued for workforce
reductions related to restructuring activities are accounted for under FASB ASC 712-10,
Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits. A liability for post-employment benefits is generally
recorded when payment is probable, the amount is reasonably estimable, and the obligation relates
to rights that have vested or accumulated. The Company continually evaluates the adequacy of the
remaining liabilities under its restructuring initiatives. Although the Company believes that these
estimates accurately reflect the costs of its restructuring plans, actual results may differ,
thereby requiring the Company to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such
provisions.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS No. 168). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative generally
accepted accounting principles for nongovernmental entities. The Codification did not change U.S.
GAAP. Instead, it took the thousands of individual pronouncements that previously comprised U.S.
GAAP and reorganized them into accounting Topics, displaying all Topics using a consistent
structure. Contents in
each Topic are further organized first by Subtopic, then Section and finally
Paragraph. The Paragraph level is the only level that contains substantive content. Citing
particular content in
26
Table of Contents
the Codification involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content
through the Topic, Subtopic, Section
and Paragraph structure. FASB suggests that all citations begin with FASB ASC, where ASC stands
for Accounting Standards Codification. The adoption of FASB ASC 105-10-05 (SFAS No. 168), did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements but did change the
referencing system for accounting standards.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FASB ASC 715-20-65 (FAS No.
132(R)-1), Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 amends
FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, to provide guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The additional disclosure requirements under
this FSP include expanded disclosure about an entitys investment policies and strategies, the
categories of plan assets, concentrations of credit risk and fair value measurements of plan
assets. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The
adoption of FASB ASC 715-20-65 (FAS 132(R)-1), did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 09-13, Revenue
RecognitionMultiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 09-13). ASU 09-13 updates the
existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included in FASB ASC 605-25,
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. The
revised guidance provides for two significant changes to the existing multiple element revenue
arrangements guidance. The first change relates to the determination of when the individual
deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of
accounting. The second change modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is
allocated across the separately identified deliverables. The first change will likely result in the
requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, ultimately leading to less revenue
deferral. Together, these changes are likely to result in earlier recognition of revenue and
related costs for multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance. This guidance also
significantly expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements. The
revised multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance will be effective for the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, however, early adoption is permitted,
provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of
adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 09-13 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
The Company was not a party to any off-balance sheet transactions at December 31, 2009, or for any
of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Inflation and Changing Prices
The Company does not operate or conduct business in hyper-inflationary countries nor enter into
long-term supply contracts that may impact margins due to inflation. Changes in prices of goods and
services are reflected on proposals, bids or quotes submitted to customers.
27
Table of Contents
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Companys principal market risk exposures (i.e., the risk of loss arising from the adverse
changes in market rates and prices) are to changes in interest rates on the Companys debt and
investment portfolios and fluctuations in foreign currency.
The Company centrally manages its debt, considering investment opportunities and risks, tax
consequences and overall financing strategies. Based on the amount of variable rate debt, $30.0
million at December 31, 2009, a ten percent increase in interest rates would increase annual
interest expense by approximately $3.0 million.
A significant portion of the Companys business is exposed to fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar as compared to foreign currencies as a result of the foreign operations of the Company in
Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Malaysia, The Netherlands,
New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Singapore and the United Kingdom. During the latter part of 2008 and
into the first quarter of 2009, currencies, primarily in the United Kingdom and Australia, weakened
relative to the U.S. dollar. These impacts reversed to some extent later in 2009, however overall
volatility in currency exchange rates has increased in recent periods. The fluctuations have
resulted in a significant unfavorable impact on the Companys U.S. dollar reported revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2009 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The revenue impact
was somewhat mitigated with similar exchange effects on operating costs thereby reducing the
exchange rate effect on operating income. The Company does not use interest rate or foreign
currency rate hedges.
Based on annual 2009 foreign currency-based revenues and operating income of $155.0 million and
$11.4 million, respectively, a ten percent fluctuation of all applicable foreign currencies would
result in an annual change in revenues and operating income of $15.5 million and $1.1 million,
respectively.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data of the Company begin on page F-3 of
this report. Such information is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 8.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9a. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have evaluated, as required by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by the Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were adequate and effective as of December 31, 2009 to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
28
Table of Contents
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the Companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the Companys board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management with the participation of the Companys principal executive and financial officers
assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009 using the framework and criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework.
Managements assessment included an evaluation of the design of internal control over financial
reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
Grant Thornton LLP, as independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, as stated in
their report included herein.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9b. Other Information
None.
29
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item 10 will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item 12 will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 will be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
30
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Beginning | ||||
Page | ||||
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules |
||||
(1) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
F-1 | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 | ||||
(2) Schedules: |
||||
None |
Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required
or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or related
notes thereto.
31
Table of Contents
(b) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated
herein by reference:
2.1
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2005, among Flowserve US Inc., IPSCO (UK) Limited, Flowserve Repair & Services B.V., Flowserve Management Company, Flowserve Belgium N.V., Furmanite US GSG LLC, Furmanite GSG Limited, Furmanite GSG BVBA, Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and Furmanite GSG B.V., incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2006. | |
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 26, 1979, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-16. | |
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated April 30, 1981, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981. | |
3.3
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated May 28, 1985, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1985. | |
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 17, 1985, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1985. | |
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated July 10, 1990, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990. | |
3.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 21, 1990, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1990. | |
3.7
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated August 8, 2001, incorporated by reference herein Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2001. | |
3.8
|
By-laws of the Registrant, as amended and restated June 14, 2007, filed as Exhibit 3.8 to the Registrants 10-K for the year then ended December 31, 2007, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
4.1
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights related to the Registrants Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. | |
4.2
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2008, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, as Rights Agent, which includes as exhibits, the Form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Stock, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 8-A/A filed on April 18, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. | |
4.3
|
Letters to stockholders of the Registrant, dated April 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Form 8-A/8 filed on April 18, 2008). | |
10.1*
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement effective January 1, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.1 of the exhibits to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.2*
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement effective January 1, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.2 of the exhibits to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is hereby |
32
Table of Contents
incorporated by reference. | ||
10.3*
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement effective January 1, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.3 of the exhibits to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.6*
|
Furmanite Corporation (formerly Xanser Corporation and formerly Kaneb Services, Inc.) Savings Investment Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.10 of the exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Form S-8) (S.E.C. File No. 033-41295) as Exhibit 4.1 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-14067), and as Exhibit 4.9 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-83968), which exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.7*
|
Furmanite Corporation (formerly Xanser Corporation and formerly Kaneb Services, Inc.) 1994 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended, as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2001, and as Exhibit 10.1 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, which exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.8*
|
Furmanite Corporation 1994 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated March 4, 2009, as Appendix A to Schedule 14A filed on April 7, 2009, and as Exhibit 99.1 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 filed on June 1, 2009, which Appendix A and exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.9*
|
Kaneb Services, Inc. $1.63 Director Stock Options, filed as Exhibit 4.12 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 033-58981), which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.10*
|
Kaneb Services, Inc. Directors Stock Options I, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-14069), which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.11*
|
Kaneb Services, Inc. 1996 Directors Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-14071) and as Exhibit 4.1 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-22109), and as supplemented, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-60195), which exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.12*
|
Kaneb Services, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Agreements, filed as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 to the exhibits of the Registrants Form S-8 (S.E.C. File No. 333-34496), which exhibits are hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.13
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.12 of the exhibits to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. | |
10.14
|
Credit Agreement, dated July 31, 2009, among Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Compass Bank as Syndication Agent and the Lenders party thereto, incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009. | |
10.15
|
Guaranty and Collateral Agreement, dated July 31, 2009, among Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and each of the other grantors (as defined therein) in favor of Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009. | |
21.1 ±
|
List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |
23.1 ±
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP. | |
31.1 ±
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of March 12, 2010. | |
31.2 ±
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of March 12, 2010 | |
32.1 ±
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, |
33
Table of Contents
dated as of March 12, 2010. | ||
32.2 ±
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated as of March 12, 2010. |
* | Denotes management contracts. | |
± | Filed herewith. |
34
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Furmanite Corporation
of Furmanite Corporation
We have audited Furmanite Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 12, 2010
March 12, 2010
F-1
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Furmanite Corporation
of Furmanite Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Furmanite Corporation (a Delaware
Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Furmanite Corporation and subsidiaries internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and
our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 12, 2010
March 12, 2010
F-2
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 36,117 | $ | 30,793 | ||||
Accounts receivable, trade (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,617 and $
4,627
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively) |
52,021 | 64,879 | ||||||
Receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders |
1,443 | 1,443 | ||||||
Inventories |
26,827 | 24,868 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
7,642 | 5,744 | ||||||
Total current assets |
124,050 | 127,727 | ||||||
Property and equipment |
66,909 | 58,119 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(36,741 | ) | (28,841 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
30,168 | 29,278 | ||||||
Goodwill |
13,148 | 13,148 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
3,707 | 948 | ||||||
Intangible and other assets |
3,916 | 2,177 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 174,989 | $ | 173,278 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 174 | $ | 336 | ||||
Accounts payable |
17,077 | 17,990 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
25,599 | 25,086 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,589 | 489 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
44,439 | 43,901 | ||||||
Long-term debt, non-current |
30,139 | 35,363 | ||||||
Net pension liability |
12,358 | 661 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
2,723 | 2,036 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Series B Preferred Stock, unlimited shares authorized, none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, no par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 40,682,815 and 40,612,815 shares
issued as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively |
4,723 | 4,715 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
132,106 | 131,418 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(21,859 | ) | (19,029 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(11,627 | ) | (7,774 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost (4,008,963 shares as of December 31, 2009 and 2008) |
(18,013 | ) | (18,013 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
85,330 | 91,317 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 174,989 | $ | 173,278 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 275,940 | $ | 320,942 | $ | 290,287 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
187,269 | 207,748 | 187,055 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
5,995 | 5,784 | 4,772 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
81,142 | 80,409 | 77,813 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
274,406 | 293,941 | 269,640 | |||||||||
Operating income |
1,534 | 27,001 | 20,647 | |||||||||
Interest income and other income (expense), net |
434 | 260 | 1,041 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,379 | ) | (1,705 | ) | (3,274 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
589 | 25,556 | 18,414 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
(3,419 | ) | (3,688 | ) | (5,919 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.35 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.35 | |||||
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares used
in computing net (loss) income per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
36,632 | 36,426 | 35,514 | |||||||||
Diluted |
36,632 | 36,951 | 36,052 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Common | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Treasury | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued | Treasury | Stock | Capital | Deficit | Income (Loss) | Stock | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2007 |
39,258,025 | 4,076,963 | $ | 4,558 | $ | 124,884 | $ | (53,438 | ) | $ | 2,921 | $ | (18,320 | ) | $ | 60,605 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 12,495 | | | 12,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and stock
option exercises |
139,139 | (28,000 | ) | 15 | 589 | | | 126 | 730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debentures to
common stock |
562,628 | | 70 | 2,890 | | | | 2,960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in pension net actuarial loss and
prior service credit, net of tax |
| | | | | (1,247 | ) | | (1,247 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | 2,793 | | 2,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
39,959,792 | 4,048,963 | 4,643 | 128,363 | (40,943 | ) | 4,467 | (18,194 | ) | 78,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 21,868 | | | 21,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and stock
option exercises |
294,679 | (40,000 | ) | 29 | 1,214 | | | 181 | 1,424 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debentures to
common stock |
358,344 | | 43 | 1,841 | | | | 1,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in pension net actuarial loss and
prior service credit, net of tax |
| | | | | (986 | ) | | (986 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for FASB ASC 715
(FASB Statement No. 158 )
measurement date change, net of tax |
| | | | 46 | (10 | ) | | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | (11,245 | ) | | (11,245 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
40,612,815 | 4,008,963 | 4,715 | 131,418 | (19,029 | ) | (7,774 | ) | (18,013 | ) | 91,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | (2,830 | ) | | | (2,830 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and stock
option exercises |
70,000 | | 8 | 688 | | | | 696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in pension net actuarial loss and
prior service credit, net of tax |
| | | | | (8,918 | ) | | (8,918 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | 5,065 | | 5,065 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2009 |
40,682,815 | 4,008,963 | $ | 4,723 | $ | 132,106 | $ | (21,859 | ) | $ | (11,627 | ) | $ | (18,013 | ) | $ | 85,330 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | |||||
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,995 | 5,807 | 4,772 | |||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
498 | 909 | 917 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
571 | 497 | 218 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(227 | ) | 381 | 79 | ||||||||
Other, net |
(313 | ) | (279 | ) | | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
13,652 | (5,910 | ) | (3,941 | ) | |||||||
Inventories |
(685 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (2,802 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(735 | ) | (533 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(902 | ) | 1,073 | 1,120 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
320 | (1,640 | ) | 3,916 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,187 | (3,899 | ) | 961 | ||||||||
Other, net |
426 | (117 | ) | (511 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
17,957 | 16,519 | 16,654 | |||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,541 | ) | (8,014 | ) | (8,097 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of assets |
(900 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
447 | 144 | | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(6,994 | ) | (7,870 | ) | (8,097 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Payments on debt |
(40,435 | ) | (8,015 | ) | (713 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
35,049 | | | |||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(658 | ) | | | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
125 | 438 | 512 | |||||||||
Payments on 8.75% convertible subordinated debentures |
| (155 | ) | | ||||||||
Bank overdrafts |
| | (1,553 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(5,919 | ) | (7,732 | ) | (1,754 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
280 | (1,694 | ) | 830 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
5,324 | (777 | ) | 7,633 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
30,793 | 31,570 | 23,937 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 36,117 | $ | 30,793 | $ | 31,570 | ||||||
Non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Conversion of 8.75% convertible debentures to common stock |
$ | | $ | 1,884 | $ | 2,960 | ||||||
Settlement of accrued bonuses in common stock |
$ | | $ | 488 | $ | | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 1,400 | $ | 1,883 | $ | 3,202 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received |
$ | 846 | $ | 4,837 | $ | 5,416 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | |||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
||||||||||||
Change in pension net actuarial loss and prior service credit, net of tax |
(8,918 | ) | (986 | ) | (1,247 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
5,065 | (11,245 | ) | 2,793 | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
(3,853 | ) | (12,231 | ) | 1,546 | |||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (6,683 | ) | $ | 9,637 | $ | 14,041 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
On May 17, 2007, Xanser Corporation changed its name to Furmanite Corporation after the Companys
stockholders ratified the name change at its annual stockholder meeting. The Companys Common
Stock, no par value, began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FRM,
effective May 18, 2007, superseding the previous ticker symbol XNR. The Companys website also
changed from www.xanser.com to www.furmanite.com.
Furmanite Corporation (the Parent Company) together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) provides specialized technical services,
including under pressure services such as leak sealing, hot tapping, line stopping, composite repair and valve testing. In addition, the Company provides turnaround services including on-site machining, heat treatment, bolting, and valve repair,
and other services including heat exchanger design and repair, concrete repair and valve and other product
manufacturing. These products and services are provided primarily to electric power generating plants, petroleum refineries and other process
industries in Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific
through Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and its domestic and international subsidiaries and affiliates
(collectively, Furmanite). Furmanite currently operates North American offices in the United
States including Saraland, Alabama; Benicia, California; Los Angeles, California; Hobart, Indiana;
Geismar, Louisiana; Sulphur, Louisiana; Paulsboro, New Jersey; Charlotte, North Carolina;
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Houston, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah and Kent, Washington. The worldwide
operations are further supported by offices currently located on six continents in Australia,
Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Malaysia, The Netherlands,
New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Singapore and the United Kingdom and by licensee and agency
arrangements in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Columbia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, India,
Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Russia, Thailand, Trinidad, Tunisia, Turkey and the United
Arab Emirates. The Company also provides services to the government contracting industry through
Xtria LLC (Xtria). Xtria offers consulting and other support services to various federal
government agencies. The combination of Furmanite and Xtria are representative of the operations of
the Company.
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its
pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the Distribution) to its stockholders in
the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (KSL). On June 29, 2001, the
Distribution was completed, with each stockholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL
for each three shares of the Companys common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the
Distribution, resulting in the distribution of approximately 10,850,000 KSL common shares. Pursuant
to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the Distribution Agreement) with KSL,
whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities
incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also
requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the
Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax
from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the
extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or
(ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSLs common shares and the operations of KSLs
businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal
or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination,
administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has
agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSLs
obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued
income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both
reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax
exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in
2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses distributed to
common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
F-8
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. The following significant accounting policies are followed by the Company and its
subsidiaries in the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements. All intercompany
transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash is generally invested in highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less. Accordingly, uninvested cash balances are kept at minimum levels. Cash equivalents are stated
at cost, which approximates market value, and are primarily invested in conservative, highly-rated
instruments issued by financial institutions or government entities with strong credit ratings.
At certain times, such amounts exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits. The Company has cash
balances on deposit with two banks at December 31, 2009 that exceeded
the balance insured by the FDIC in the amount of $16.6 million. The
Company has not experienced any losses on these investments. Cash in foreign bank accounts at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $12.4 million and $9.8 million,
respectively.
Accounts Receivable
The majority of accounts receivable are due from companies with petroleum refineries, chemical
plants, offshore energy production platforms, steel mills, nuclear power stations, conventional
power stations, pulp and paper mills, food and beverage processing plants and other flow-processing
facilities. Unbilled amounts included in accounts receivable related to governmental contracts
totaled $0.3 million and $1.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Credit is
extended based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and generally collateral is not
required. Accounts receivable outstanding longer than contractual payment terms are considered past
due. The Company regularly evaluates and adjusts for doubtful accounts receivable based on a
combination of write-off history, aging analysis and information available on specific accounts.
The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible. Any payments
subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance in the period the payment
is received.
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for the years ended December 31, are as
follows (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable at beginning of year |
$ | 4,627 | $ | 4,011 | $ | 3,341 | ||||||
Provisions for doubtful accounts |
498 | 909 | 917 | |||||||||
Currency adjustments |
46 | (91 | ) | 55 | ||||||||
Write-offs, net of recoveries |
(3,554 | ) | (202 | ) | (302 | ) | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable at end of year |
$ | 1,617 | $ | 4,627 | $ | 4,011 | ||||||
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted
average cost method. Inventory quantities on hand are reviewed regularly based on related service
levels and functionality, and carrying cost is reduced to net realizable value for inventories in
which their cost exceeds their utility, due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in
price levels or other causes. Inventories consumed or products sold are included in operating
costs.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at historical cost. Certain leases have been capitalized and the
leased assets have been included in property and equipment. Additions of new equipment and major
renewals and replacements of existing equipment are capitalized. Repairs and minor replacements
that do not materially increase values or extend useful lives are expensed in the period in which
they are incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is
provided on a straight-line basis at rates based upon the expected useful lives of the various
classes of assets. The expected useful lives of property and equipment are as follows: buildings
forty years, machinery and equipment five to ten years, furniture and fixtures three to five
years, vehicles four to five years and other property and equipment two to five years.
F-9
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC 360, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
(SFAS No. 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under FASB ASC 360,
the Company reviews long-lived assets, which consist of finite-lived intangible assets and property
and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these
assets are no longer appropriate. Factors that may affect recoverability include changes in planned
use of equipment, closing of facilities and discontinuance of service lines. Property and equipment
to be held and used is reviewed at least annually for possible impairment. The Companys impairment
review is based on an estimate of the undiscounted cash flow at the lowest level for which
identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset and the impairment is viewed as
other than temporary. When impairment is indicated, an impairment charge is recorded for the
difference between the carrying value of the asset and its fair market value. Depending on the
asset, fair market value may be determined either by use of a discounted cash flow model or by
reference to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition. No impairments of long-lived
assets was recorded during 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of
FASB ASC 350 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under FASB ASC 350, intangible
assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal or other means are amortized over their useful
lives. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no significant intangible assets subject to
amortization under FASB ASC 350. Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization
are tested for impairment annually (in the fourth quarter of each calendar year), or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired.
Examples of such events or circumstances include a significant adverse change in legal factors or
in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or a loss of key
personnel.
FASB ASC 350 requires a two-step process for testing goodwill impairment. First, the fair value of
each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication of
impairment exists. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment
(referred to as a component). Two or more components of an operating segment shall be aggregated
and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. The
Company has two reporting units, Furmanite and Xtria for the purpose of testing goodwill
impairment, as the operating results of these components are reviewed separately by management and
cannot be aggregated. All goodwill of the Company relates to Furmanite, accordingly, impairment of
goodwill is tested for that reporting unit. Second, if an impairment is indicated, the implied fair
value of the reporting units goodwill is determined by allocating the units fair value to its
assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had
been acquired in a business combination. The amount of impairment for goodwill and other intangible
assets is measured as the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value.
The Company uses market capitalization as the basis for its measurement of fair value, and
reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units to the enterprise market
capitalization. Management considers this approach the most meaningful measure as substantially all
of the Companys fair value is attributable to the Furmanite reporting unit and the quoted market
price provides the best evidence of fair value. In performing the reconciliation, the Company uses
the stock price on December 31 of each year as the valuation date. On December 31, 2009,
Furmanites fair value substantially exceeded its carrying value.
Based on valuations and market approach analysis performed by the Company at December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, no impairment was indicated. Future evaluations of the fair value of goodwill and
other intangible assets are
dependent on many factors, several of which are out of the Companys control, including the demand
for services provided and the potential impact of the global economic condition. To the extent that
such factors or conditions change, it is possible that future impairments could occur, which could
have a material effect on the results of operations of the Company. At December 31, 2009 and 2008,
$2.1 million, of indefinite-lived intangible assets (primarily tradenames) were included in other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Gross finite-lived intangible
F-10
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
assets of $1.3 million and $0.3 million were also included in other assets at December 31, 2009 and
2008, with accumulated amortization of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Amortization
expense for finite-lived intangible assets totaled $0.1 million and $23 thousand for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, future amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets
subject to amortization is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):
2009 | ||||
Fiscal Year: |
||||
2010 |
$ | 195 | ||
2011 |
194 | |||
2012 |
194 | |||
2013 |
194 | |||
2014 |
119 | |||
Thereafter |
122 | |||
Total |
$ | 1,018 | ||
The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets subject to amortization is
approximately 5.7 years.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended by SAB No. 104,
Revenue Recognition.
Revenues are based primarily on time and materials. Substantially all projects are generally
short term in nature. Revenues are recognized when services to customers have been rendered or when
products are shipped and risk of ownership is passed to the customer. The Company provides limited
warranties to customers, depending upon the service performed. Warranty claim costs were not
material during any of the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Revenues under long-term service contracts, generally greater than six months, are accounted for
using a proportional performance method or on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes
revenues on a proportional basis when a contract consists of milestones or activities that are
process-related and has no other material deliverables. The Company recognizes revenues on a
straight-line basis when billing terms and performance of the contract are substantially equivalent
throughout the life of the contract. Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
using the proportional method were not significant. The Company records revenues net of sales tax.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company translates the balance sheets of its foreign subsidiaries using year-end exchange rates
and translates income statement amounts using the average exchange rates in effect during the year.
Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from year to year are reported
separately as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders equity.
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated
statements of operations. The Company has no foreign subsidiaries subject to foreign exchange
restrictions.
Stock-Based Compensation
All stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense in the financial statements and such costs
are measured at the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock-based
payment awards on the date of grant as
F-11
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
determined by the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Companys stock price on the date of the
grant as well as other assumptions. Assumptions utilized in the fair value calculations include the
expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards (estimated using the historical
volatility of the Companys stock price), the risk free interest rate (based on the U.S. Treasury
Note rate over the expected term of the option), the dividend yield (assumed to be zero, as the
Company has not paid, nor anticipates paying, any cash dividends), and employee stock option
exercise behavior and forfeiture assumptions (based on historical experience and other relevant
factors).
Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10-65, (FASB Interpretation No. 48), Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007.
The adoption of FASB ASC 740-10-65 had no net impact on the Companys tax reserves during 2007.
Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax
rate because unrecognized non-current tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss
carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments
of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of
the income tax provision.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) and tax treatment of certain income and
expense items. The Company must assess and make estimates regarding the likelihood that the
deferred tax assets will be recovered. To the extent that it is determined the deferred tax assets
will not be recovered, a valuation allowance must be established for such assets. In making such a
determination, the Company must take into account positive and negative evidence including
projections of future taxable income and assessments of potential tax planning strategies.
Accordingly, a full valuation allowance on domestic net federal, certain state and foreign deferred
tax assets was required at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Pension benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such
amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, expected investment return
on plan assets, mortality rates and retirement rates. These rates are renewed annually and adjusted
to reflect current conditions. These rates are determined based on reference to yields. The
compensation increase rate is based on historical experience. The expected return on plan assets is
derived from detailed periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation strategies,
anticipated future long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks (standard deviations)
and correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans asset mix. While the
studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns, the
assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return. Mortality and retirement rates
are based on actual and anticipated plan experience. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results
that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore,
generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While management
believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in
assumptions may affect pension and postretirement obligation and future expense.
Contingencies
Environmental
Liabilities are recorded when site restoration or environmental remediation and cleanup obligations
are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of
environmental costs through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources are recognized
when such recoveries become certain.
The Company capitalizes environmental costs only if the costs are recoverable and the costs extend
the life, increase the capacity, or improve the safety or efficiency of property owned by the
Company as compared with the condition
of that property when originally constructed or acquired, or if the costs mitigate or prevent
environmental contamination that has yet to occur and that otherwise may result from future
operations or activities and the costs
F-12
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
improve the property compared with its condition when constructed or acquired. All other
environmental costs are expensed.
Other
The Company establishes a liability for all other loss contingencies, when information indicates
that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Restructuring Accrual
On December 29, 2009, the Company committed to a cost reduction initiative, including planned
workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions. The Company has taken these specific
actions in order to more favorably align its selling, general and administrative costs with its
current level of operations. The Company expects to complete these cost reduction actions during
2010, with the majority of expense recognized in the first quarter of 2010.
In connection with this plan, the Company has recorded estimated expenses for severance, lease
cancellations, and other restructuring costs in accordance with FASB ASC 420-10, Exit or Disposal
Cost Obligations. Under FASB ASC 420-10, costs associated with restructuring activities are
generally recognized when they are incurred. In the case of leases, the expense is estimated and
accrued when the property is vacated. In addition, post-employment benefits accrued for workforce
reductions related to restructuring activities are accounted for under FASB ASC 712-10,
Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits. A liability for post-employment benefits is generally
recorded when payment is probable, the amount is reasonably estimable, and the obligation relates
to rights that have vested or accumulated. The Company continually evaluates the adequacy of the
remaining liabilities under its restructuring initiatives. Although the Company believes that these
estimates accurately reflect the costs of its restructuring plans, actual results may differ,
thereby requiring the Company to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such
provisions.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,
(SFAS No. 168). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Codification) as the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles for
nongovernmental entities. The Codification did not change U.S. GAAP. Instead, it took the thousands
of individual pronouncements that previously comprise U.S. GAAP and reorganized them into
accounting Topics, displaying all Topics using a consistent structure. Contents in each Topic are
further organized first by Subtopic, then Section and finally Paragraph. The Paragraph level is the
only level that contains substantive content. Citing particular content in the Codification
involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and
Paragraph structure. FASB suggests that all citations begin with FASB ASC, where ASC stands for
Accounting Standards Codification. The adoption of FASB ASC 105-10-05 (SFAS No. 168), did not have
a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements but did change the referencing
system for accounting standards.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FASB ASC 715-20-65 (FAS No.
132(R)-1), Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 amends
FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, to provide guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The additional disclosure requirements under
this FSP include expanded disclosure about an entitys investment policies and strategies, the
categories of plan assets, concentrations of credit risk and fair value measurements of plan
assets.
This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of
FASB ASC 715-20-65 (FAS 132(R)-1), did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
F-13
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 09-13, Revenue
RecognitionMultiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 09-13). ASU 09-13 updates the
existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included in FASB ASC 605-25,
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. The
revised guidance provides for two significant changes to the existing multiple element revenue
arrangements guidance. The first change relates to the determination of when the individual
deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of
accounting. The second change modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is
allocated across the separately identified deliverables. The first change will likely result in the
requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, ultimately leading to less revenue
deferral. Together, these changes are likely to result in earlier recognition of revenue and
related costs for multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance. This guidance also
significantly expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements. The
revised multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance will be effective for the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, however, early adoption is permitted,
provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of
adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 09-13 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Companys financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The Companys significant estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill,
stock-based compensation, defined benefit pension plan and contingencies.
2. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated as net income (loss) divided by the weighted-average number
of shares of common stock and restricted stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
(loss) per share assumes issuance of the net incremental shares from stock options when dilutive.
The weighted-average common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings (loss) per share
reflect the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents including options to purchase shares of
common stock, using the treasury stock method.
Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding and earnings (loss) per share include
the following for the years ended December 31, (in thousands, except per share data):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,830 | ) | $ | 21,868 | $ | 12,495 | |||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
36,632 | 36,426 | 35,514 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents |
| 525 | 538 | |||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |
36,632 | 36,951 | 36,052 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.35 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.35 | |||||
Stock options excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares
outstanding because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect: |
648 | 118 | 55 |
The Companys outstanding 8.75% convertible subordinated debentures were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2007, because the effects
of assumed conversion would be anti-dilutive. The 8.75% convertible debentures were settled in full
in January 2008; therefore there is no effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-14
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
3. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 18,226 | $ | 14,690 | ||||
Work-in-process |
8,231 | 9,929 | ||||||
Finished goods |
370 | 249 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 26,827 | $ | 24,868 | ||||
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 1,305 | $ | 1,305 | ||||
Buildings |
4,940 | 4,630 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
47,214 | 37,196 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
7,100 | 6,797 | ||||||
Vehicles |
2,803 | 3,001 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
1,328 | 1,884 | ||||||
Other |
2,219 | 3,306 | ||||||
Total property and equipment |
66,909 | 58,119 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(36,741 | ) | (28,841 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
$ | 30,168 | $ | 29,278 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment for the years ending December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $6.0 million, $5.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
Equipment and vehicles under capital leases are included in the cost and accumulated depreciation
and amortization as follows at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Vehicles |
$ | 1,638 | $ | 4,583 | ||||
Equipment |
| 63 | ||||||
Total capital leases |
1,638 | 4,646 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,344 | ) | (4,107 | ) | ||||
Net equipment acquired under capital leases |
$ | 294 | $ | 539 | ||||
F-15
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
5. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits1 |
$ | 11,085 | $ | 9,505 | ||||
Estimated potential uninsured liabiltiy claims |
3,405 | 2,394 | ||||||
Value added tax payable |
1,612 | 2,007 | ||||||
Taxes other than income |
1,393 | 1,810 | ||||||
Professional, audit and legal fees |
879 | 1,521 | ||||||
Rent |
600 | 388 | ||||||
Other employee related expenses |
539 | 982 | ||||||
Payments due on purchased assets |
350 | | ||||||
Interest |
42 | 136 | ||||||
Other |
5,694 | 6,343 | ||||||
$ | 25,599 | $ | 25,086 | |||||
1 | Includes restructuring accruals of $0.7 million |
6. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt is summarized as follows at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Borrowings under existing revolving credit facility (the existing credit agreement) |
$ | 30,000 | $ | | ||||
Borrowings under
$50.0 million revolving bank facility (the $50.0 million facility) |
| 27,590 | ||||||
Borrowings secured by a letter of credit under
$50.0 million facility (the $15.0 million facility) |
| 7,500 | ||||||
Capital leases |
313 | 609 | ||||||
Total long-term debt |
30,313 | 35,699 | ||||||
Less current portion of long-term debt |
(174 | ) | (336 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt, non-current |
$ | 30,139 | $ | 35,363 | ||||
In 2005, Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (FWI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Parent Company, entered into the Second Amendment to its Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated
August 11, 2002, with the Bank of Scotland (the previous loan agreement). Pursuant to the Second
Amendment, the Bank of Scotland increased the revolving credit commitment under the original Loan
Agreement from $25.0 million to $50.0 million in connection with an acquisition by the Company. FWI
funded the cost of the acquisition and certain related transaction costs by borrowing an additional
$15.6 million under the $50.0 million revolving bank facility (the $50.0 million facility). At
December 31, 2008, $27.6 million was outstanding under the $50.0 million facility which consisted
of amounts borrowed by the Company for working capital needs. Borrowings under the $50.0 million
facility bore interest at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate, at the
option of the borrower) which were 3.5% at December 31, 2008.
During 2006, $15.0 million, secured by a letter of credit, was borrowed under the $50.0 million
facility (the $15.0 million facility) that provided for working capital. The proceeds were used
to repay earlier borrowings outstanding under the $50.0 million facility and for working capital
purposes. At December 31, 2008, there was $7.5 million outstanding under the $15.0 million
facility. Borrowings under the $15.0 million facility bore interest
at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate, at the option of the borrower) which were 2.7% at December 31,
2008.
The previous loan agreement contained certain financial and operational covenants and was without
recourse to the Parent Company. Total outstanding borrowings under the previous loan agreement were
$35.1 million at December 31, 2008.
F-16
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
On August 4, 2009, FWI and certain foreign subsidiaries (the designated borrowers) of FWI
entered into a new credit agreement dated July 31, 2009 with Bank of America, N.A. (the existing
credit agreement). The existing credit agreement, which matures on January 31, 2013, provides a
revolving credit facility of up to $50.0 million. A portion of the amount available under the
existing credit agreement (not in excess of $20.0 million) is available for the issuance of letters
of credit. In addition, a portion of the amount available under the existing credit agreement (not
in excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate) is available for swing line loans to FWI. The loans
outstanding under the existing credit agreement may not exceed $35.0 million in the aggregate to
the designated borrowers.
The proceeds from the initial borrowing on the existing credit agreement were $35.0 million and
were used to repay the amounts outstanding under the previous loan agreement, which was scheduled
to mature in January 2010, at which time the previous loan agreement was terminated by the Company.
Letters of credit issued from the previous loan agreement were replaced with similar letters of
credit by the existing credit agreement. There were no material circumstances surrounding the
termination and no material early termination penalties were incurred by FWI.
At December 31, 2009, $30.0 million was outstanding under the existing credit agreement. Borrowings
under the existing credit agreement bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates
(based on the prime rate, federal funds rate or Eurocurrency rate, including a margin above such
rates, and subject to an adjustment based on a calculated funded debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined
in the existing credit agreement)) which were 2.5% at December 31, 2010. The existing credit
agreement contains a commitment fee, which ranges between 0.25% to 0.30% based on the funded debt
to EBITDA ratio, and was 0.25% at December 31, 2009, based on the unused portion of the amount
available under the existing credit agreement. All obligations under the existing credit agreement
are guaranteed by FWI and certain of its subsidiaries under a guaranty and collateral agreement,
and are secured by a first priority lien on certain of FWI and its subsidiaries assets (which
approximates $118.5 million of current assets and property and equipment as of December 31, 2009)
and is without recourse to the Parent Company. FWI is subject to certain compliance provisions
including, but not limited to, maintaining certain funded debt and fixed charge coverage ratios,
tangible asset concentration levels, and capital expenditure limitations as well as restrictions on
indebtedness, guarantees and other contingent obligations and transactions. Events of default under
the existing credit agreement include customary events, such as change of control, breach of
covenants or breach of representations and warranties. At December 31, 2009, FWI was in compliance
with all covenants under the existing credit agreement.
Considering the outstanding borrowings of $30.0 million, and $3.5 million related to outstanding
letters of credit, the unused borrowing capacity under the existing credit agreement was $16.5
million at December 31, 2009, with a limit of $5.0 million of this capacity remaining for the
designated borrowers.
At December 31, 2009, debt maturities on consolidated debt were as follows (in thousands):
2009 | ||||
2010 |
$ | | ||
2011 |
| |||
2012 |
| |||
2013 |
30,000 | |||
2014 |
| |||
Thereafter |
| |||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 30,000 | ||
Capital leases |
313 | |||
Total long-term debt and capital lease |
$ | 30,313 | ||
During January 2008, $1.9 million of the Companys remaining 8.75% convertible subordinated
debentures were converted, at the option of the holder, into 358,344 shares of the Companys common
stock, at a conversion price of $5.26 per share. The remaining subordinated debentures matured
January 15, 2008 and a final principal and interest payment of $0.2 million was made at that time.
F-17
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
7. Retirement Plans
The Company has a defined contribution plan which covers substantially all eligible domestic
employees and provides for varying levels of employer matching. Contributions to this plan were
$1.8 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Two of the Companys foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans, one plan covering
certain of its United Kingdom employees (the U.K. Plan) and the other covering certain of its
Norwegian employees (the Norwegian Plan). As the Norwegian Plan represents approximately two
percent of the Companys total pension plan assets and liabilities, only the schedules of net
periodic pension cost (benefit) and changes in benefit obligation and plan assets include combined
amounts from the two plans, while all other assumption, detail and narrative information relates
solely to the U.K. Plan.
Benefits for the U.K. Plan are based on the average of the employees salary for the last three
years of employment. Generally, the employee contributes 6.5% to 12.0% and the employer contributes
up to 12.0% of pay. Plan assets are primarily invested in unitized pension funds managed by United
Kingdom registered fund managers. The most recent valuation of the U.K. Plan was performed as of
December 31, 2009. Estimated annual defined benefit pension plan contributions are assumed to be
consistent with the current expected contribution level of $0.9 million.
As required under FASB ASC 715 (SFAS No. 158), Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Post Retirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132 (R), the
Company changed its measurement date from October 31 to December 31 in 2008. For 2008, the Company
changed its valuation date to December 31. The Company chose to use the valuation performed as of
October 31, 2007, and apply it over the fourteen months from October 2007 through December 2008 as
permitted under FASB ASC 715. The net periodic benefit cost for the pension plan was recognized by
allocating two months of the cost to retained earnings and recognizing the remaining twelve months
of expense over the course of 2008.
Pension benefit costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such
amounts. The primary assumptions include factors such as discount rates, expected investment return
on plan assets, mortality rates and retirement rates. The discount rate assumption used to
determine end of year benefit obligations was 5.7%. These rates are renewed annually and adjusted
to reflect current conditions. Based on this information the discount rate for 2010 is 5.7%. These
rates are determined appropriate, based on reference to yields. The compensation increase rate of
4.0% per year is based on historical experience. The expected return on plan assets of 6.8% for
2010 is derived from detailed periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation
strategies, anticipated future long-term performance of individual asset classes, risks (standard
deviations) and correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans asset mix.
While the studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns,
the assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return. Mortality and retirement
rates are based on actual and anticipated plan experience. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual
results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and,
therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While
management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or
changes in assumptions may affect pension and postretirement obligation and future expense.
The effect of a 0.5% increase in the discount rate would result in a $0.4 million decrease on the
2010 estimated pension expense while a 0.5% decrease in the discount rate would result in a $0.5
million increase on the 2010 estimated pension expense. An increase of 0.5% in the discount rate
would result in a $4.7 million decrease on the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2009
while a decrease of 0.5% in the discount rate would result in a $5.2 million increase on the
projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2009.
F-18
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
Net pension cost included the following components for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (benefit): |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
673 | 721 | 805 | |||||||||
Interest cost |
3,272 | 3,931 | 3,942 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2,993 | ) | (5,044 | ) | (5,274 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(95 | ) | (112 | ) | (122 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
180 | | | |||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (benefit) |
$ | 1,037 | $ | (504 | ) | $ | (649 | ) | ||||
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are as follows at
December 31,:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Discount rate |
5.7 | % | 6.7 | % | ||||
Rate of compensation increase |
4.0 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||
Inflation |
3.5 | % | 2.5 | % |
The weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, are as follows:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Discount rate |
6.7 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
6.2 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.0 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||
Inflation |
2.5 | % | 3.2 | % |
The plan actuary determines the expected return on plan assets based on a combination of
expected yields on equity securities and corporate bonds and considering historical returns.
The expected long-term rate of return on invested assets is determined based on the weighted
average of expected returns on asset investment categories as follows: 6.8% overall, 8.5% for
equities and 5.1% for bonds.
F-19
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
The following table sets forth the changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets for the years
ended December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Projected benefit obligation: |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
$ | 45,392 | $ | 73,653 | ||||
Service cost |
673 | 721 | ||||||
Interest cost |
3,272 | 3,931 | ||||||
Participants contributions |
173 | 256 | ||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) |
16,554 | (8,370 | ) | |||||
Benefits paid |
(3,453 | ) | (2,354 | ) | ||||
Measurement date change |
| (1,134 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5,895 | (21,311 | ) | |||||
End of year |
68,506 | 45,392 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets: |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
44,729 | 74,083 | ||||||
Actual gain on plan assets |
7,924 | (6,468 | ) | |||||
Employer contributions |
1,200 | 925 | ||||||
Participants contributions |
173 | 256 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(3,453 | ) | (2,354 | ) | ||||
Measurement date change |
| (1,273 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5,575 | (20,440 | ) | |||||
End of year |
56,148 | 44,729 | ||||||
Excess projected obligation under (over) fair value at end of year |
$ | (12,358 | ) | $ | (663 | ) | ||
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
$ | 18,573 | $ | 6,218 | ||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
(671 | ) | (687 | ) | ||||
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 17,902 | $ | 5,531 | ||||
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income that are expected to be recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year are $0.8 million for the
defined pension plan.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.K. Plan was $61.8 million and $42.3 million at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The U.K. Plan has had no new participants added since the
plan was frozen in 1994.
F-20
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
The following table summarizes the plan assets of the U.K. Plan measured at fair value on a
recurring basis (at least annually) as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Asset Category | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) (a) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 316 | $ | 316 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Money Market |
2,101 | 2,101 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.K. equity (b) |
15,801 | | 15,801 | | ||||||||||||
U.S. equity index (c) |
4,376 | | 4,376 | | ||||||||||||
European equity index (d) |
3,869 | | 3,869 | | ||||||||||||
Pacific Rim equity index (e) |
2,027 | | 2,027 | | ||||||||||||
Japanese equity index (f) |
1,955 | | 1,955 | | ||||||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds (g) |
11,726 | | 11,726 | | ||||||||||||
U.K. government fixed income securities (h) |
7,346 | | 7,346 | | ||||||||||||
U.K. government index-linked securities (i) |
5,631 | | 5,631 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 55,148 | $ | 2,417 | $ | 52,731 | $ | | ||||||||
a) | The net asset value of the commingled equity and fixed income funds are determined by prices of the underlying securities, less the funds liabilities, and then divided by the number of shares outstanding. As the funds are not traded in active markets, the commingled funds are classified as Level 2 assets. The net asset value is corroborated by observable market data (e.g., purchase or sale activities). | |
b) | This category includes investments in a diversified portfolio of between 70 to 80 companies and aims to outperform the FTSE All-Share Index by 1.40% per annum over a rolling three year periods by taking a select number of carefully controlled and regularly monitored positions away from the index. | |
c) | This category includes investments in a variety of large, and small, U.S. companies and aims to achieve a return that is consistent with the return of the FTSE All-World USA Index. | |
d) | This category includes investments in a variety of large, and small, European companies and aims to achieve a return that is consistent with the return of the FTSE All-World Developed Europe ex-U.K. Index. | |
e) | This category includes investments in a variety of large and small companies across the Australian, Hong Kong, New Zealand and Singapore markets and aims to achieve a return that is consistent with the return of the FTSE-All-World Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Index. | |
f) | This category includes investments in a variety of large, and small, Japanese companies and aims to achieve a return that is consistent with the return of the FTSE All-World Japan Index. | |
g) | This category includes investment grade corporate bonds denominated in sterling and aims to achieve a return consistent with the iBoxx £ Non-Gilts Over 15 Years Index. This index consists of bonds with a maturity period of 15 years or longer. | |
h) | This category includes investments in U.K. government fixed income securities (gilts) that have a maturity period of 15 years or longer and aims to achieve a return consistent with the FTSE U.K. Gilts Over 15 Years Index. |
F-21
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
i) | This category includes investments in U.K. government index-linked securities (index-linked gilts) that have a maturity period of 5 years or longer and aims to achieve a return consistent with the FTSE UK Gilts Index-Linked Over 5 Years Index. |
Investment objectives for the U.K. Plan, as
of December 31, 2009, are to:
| optimize the long-term return on plan assets at an acceptable level of risk | ||
| maintain a broad diversification across asset classes | ||
| maintain careful control of the risk level within each asset class |
The trustees of the U.K. Plan have established a long-term investment strategy comprising global
investment weightings targeted at 55% (range of 52% to 58%) for equity securities and 45% (range
of 42% to 48%) for debt securities and other. Selection of the targeted asset allocation was based
upon a review of the expected return and risk characteristics of each asset class, as well as the
correlation of returns among asset classes. Actual allocations to each asset class vary from target
allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes, market value fluctuations and the timing
of benefit payments and contributions.
The following table sets forth the weighted average asset allocation and target asset allocations
by asset category, as of the measurement dates of the plan:
Asset Allocations | Target Asset Allocations | |||||||||||||||
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities |
50.8 | % | 42.8 | % | 55.0 | % | 55.0 | % | ||||||||
Debt securities |
44.8 | % | 49.7 | % | 45.0 | % | 45.0 | % | ||||||||
Other |
4.4 | % | 7.5 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
At December 31, 2009, expected future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service,
are as follows for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
2010 |
$ | 3,000 | ||
2011 |
3,000 | |||
2012 |
3,000 | |||
2013 |
3,000 | |||
2014 |
3,000 | |||
Thereafter |
16,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 31,000 | ||
8. Stockholders Equity
The holders of shares of the Companys common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on
all matters submitted to a vote of common stockholders. Each share of common stock is entitled to
participate equally in dividends, when and if declared, and in the distribution of assets in the
event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, subject in all cases to any rights
of outstanding preferred stock.
Series B Preferred Stock
On April 15, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend distribution of one
stock purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of Common Stock to stockholders of record
on April 19, 2008. These Rights are substantially similar to, and were issued in replacement of,
the rights that expired on April 19, 2008, pursuant to the then existing Companys Stockholders
Rights Plan. Pursuant to the replacement Stockholders Rights Plan, each Right entitles the holder,
upon the occurrence of certain events, to purchase from the Company one one-
F-22
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
hundredth of a share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value, at a price of
$48, subject to adjustment. The Rights will not become transferable from the common stock or become
exercisable until a person or group either acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the
Companys Common Stock or commences a tender or exchange offer that would result in ownership of
20% or more, whichever occurs earlier. The Rights, which expire on April 19, 2018, are redeemable
in whole, but not in part, at the Companys option at any time for a price of $0.01 per Right. As
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 400,000 Series B Preferred Shares authorized and none
were outstanding.
Stock Option Plans
The Company has stock option plans and agreements for officers, directors and key employees which
allow for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. The
options granted under these plans and agreements generally vest over periods of up to five years
and expire between five to ten years after the grant date. All options were granted at prices
greater than or equal to the market price at the date of grant. The stock option plan has 6,100,000
shares authorized and 2,439,452 shares were available for additional issuance at December 31, 2009.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, total compensation cost charged against
income and included in selling, general, and administrative expenses, for stock-based compensation
arrangements was $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Tax effects from the
stock-based compensation are insignificant due to the Companys current domestic tax position. As
of December 31, 2009, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options was $0.6
million. The total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options will be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Black-Scholes) as its method of
valuation under FASB ASC 718-10 (SFAS No. 123R) and a single option award approach. This fair value
computation is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
options, which is generally the vesting period. The fair value of stock-based payment awards on the
date of grant as determined by the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Companys stock price on
the date of the grant as well as other assumptions. Assumptions utilized in the fair value
calculations include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards (estimated
using the historical volatility of the Companys stock price), the risk free interest rate (based
on the U.S. Treasury Note rate over the expected term of the option), the dividend yield (assumed
to be zero, as the Company has not paid, nor anticipates paying any cash dividends), and employee
stock option exercise behavior and forfeiture assumptions (based on historical experience and other
relevant factors).
The weighted-average estimated value of employee stock options granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were
estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||
Expected volatility |
47.7% to 47.9% | 41.2% | 34.3% to 36.2% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.0% to 2.2% | 1.6% | 3.6% to 4.4% | |||
Expected dividends |
0% | 0% | 0% | |||
Expected term in years |
4 | 5 | 5 |
The Company granted options to purchase 160,000, 284,000 and 100,000 shares of its common
stock during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, that generally vest annually over five years. All
options were granted at prices equal to the market price at the date of grant. The weighted average
fair market value of options granted during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.56, $1.93 and $3.56 per
option, respectively. The maximum contractual term of the stock options is 10 years. The Company
uses authorized but unissued shares of common stock for stock option exercises pursuant to the
Companys stock option plans and treasury stock for issuances outside of the plan.
F-23
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
The changes in stock options outstanding for the Companys plan for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007
were as follows:
Weighted- | Aggregate | |||||||||||
Average | Intrinsic | |||||||||||
Exercise | Value | |||||||||||
Options | Shares | Price | ($000s) | |||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
1,013,675 | $ | 2.84 | |||||||||
Granted |
100,000 | $ | 9.65 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(153,377 | ) | $ | 2.37 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(30,000 | ) | $ | 4.65 | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
930,298 | $ | 3.59 | |||||||||
Granted |
284,000 | $ | 5.07 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(218,515 | ) | $ | 2.00 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(35,000 | ) | $ | 7.47 | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
960,783 | $ | 4.25 | |||||||||
Granted |
160,000 | $ | 3.96 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(40,000 | ) | $ | 3.14 | ||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(128,500 | ) | $ | 5.48 | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
952,283 | $ | 4.08 | 461 | ||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
551,583 | $ | 3.48 | 421 | ||||||||
The aggregate fair value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 was $42 thousand, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic
value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $27
thousand, $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested stock options for the year ended December 31,
2009, is as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Options | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
519,000 | $ | 1.71 | |||||
Granted |
160,000 | $ | 1.56 | |||||
Vested |
(153,800 | ) | $ | 1.61 | ||||
Forfeited |
(124,500 | ) | $ | 2.01 | ||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
400,700 | $ | 1.72 | |||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 was $40 thousand, $0.3 million and $0.8 million respectively. The aggregate fair
value of stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $0.2
million, $0.2 million, and $0.1 million, respectively.
F-24
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
At December 31, 2009, the range of option exercise prices, number of options granted, number of
options exercisable and weighted average exercise price, are as follows:
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Exercise Price per | Remaining | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise | Options | Outstanding | Exercisable | Contractual | Contractual | |||||||||||||||||||
Price | Outstanding | Exercisable | Options | Options | Life (Years) | Life (Years) | ||||||||||||||||||
$1.15 $2.29 |
10,000 | 10,000 | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.59 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||
$2.30 $3.13 |
195,783 | 195,783 | $ | 2.46 | $ | 2.46 | 4.3 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
$3.14 $11.80 |
746,500 | 345,800 | $ | 4.54 | $ | 4.11 | 2.5 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
952,283 | 551,583 | $ | 4.08 | $ | 3.48 | 2.8 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash received from option exercises under the stock option plans for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, was $0.1 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
A restricted stock award is an award of shares of the Companys common stock (which have full
voting rights but are restricted with regard to sale or transfer). Restricted stock awards are
independent of stock option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if service terminates
prior to the vesting of the restricted stock. The Company expenses the cost of the restricted stock
awards, which is determined to be the fair value of the restricted stock award at the date of
grant, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. For these purposes, the fair value of the
restricted stock award is determined based on the closing price of the Companys common stock on
the grant date.
No restricted stock awards were granted in 2007. During 2008, the Company granted 60,000 shares of
restricted stock awards to its directors at a grant date fair value of $10.17 per share that cliff
vest at the end of three years and may not be sold until they cease to be a director of the
Company. The fair value of the restricted stock awards issued in 2008 ($10.17 per share) was
determined based on the Companys closing stock price on the date of grant and, totaled $0.6
million.
Also during 2008, the Company issued an aggregate total of 55,778 shares of common stock under its
stock incentive plan in lieu of a cash payment of a predetermined portion of the discretionary
bonuses earned and accrued in 2007 for managers and field personnel responsible for the
year-over-year growth in foreign currency adjusted profit. The fair value of the shares ($8.70 per
share) was determined based on the Companys closing stock price on the date that the discretionary
bonuses were allocated to those managers and field personnel and approved, and totaled $0.5
million. The shares immediately vested and may not be sold for a period of up to three years.
During 2009, the Company granted 30,000 shares of restricted stock awards to it directors at a
grant date fair value of $3.93 per share that cliff vest at the end of three years and may not be
sold until they cease to be a director of the Company. The fair value of the restricted stock
awards was determined based on the Companys closing stock price on the date of grant and, totaled
$0.1 million.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested restricted stock awards for the year ended
December 31, 2009, is as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||
Weighted- | Remaining | |||||||||||
Average | Contractual | |||||||||||
Grant-Date | Term | |||||||||||
Restricted Stock Awards | Options | Fair Value | (Year) | |||||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
160,000 | $ | 7.19 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Granted |
30,000 | $ | 3.93 | |||||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
190,000 | $ | 6.67 | 1.7 | ||||||||
At December 31, 2009, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted
stock awards of approximately $0.5 million is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average
period of 1.7 years. The
F-25
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
aggregate fair value of restricted stock vested during the periods ended December 31, 2009, 2008,
2007 was $0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $0.1 million, respectively.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets
includes the following at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net actuarial loss and prior service credit |
$ | (17,902 | ) | $ | (5,531 | ) | ||
Less: deferred tax benefit |
4,991 | 1,548 | ||||||
Net of tax |
(12,911 | ) | (3,983 | ) | ||||
Adjustment for FASB ASC 715 measurement date change, net of tax |
| (10 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
1,284 | (3,781 | ) | |||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (11,627 | ) | $ | (7,774 | ) | ||
10. Income Taxes
In accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the tax benefit from
uncertain tax positions only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained
on examination by the applicable taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.
The tax benefit recognized is based on the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50
percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority.
The Company adopted FASB ASC 740-10-65, (FASB Interpretation No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FASB
ASC 740-10-65 had no net impact on the Companys tax reserves during 2007. Uncertain tax positions
in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax rate because
non-current unrecognized tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss carryforwards,
which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments of income taxes
and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of the income tax
provision. The Company incurred no significant interest or penalties for any of the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 of $1.0
million for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing are included in other liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheets and would impact the effective foreign tax rate if recognized.
A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the years December 31, is as
follows (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 974 | $ | 997 | $ | 877 | ||||||
Additions based on tax positions |
210 | 361 | 385 | |||||||||
Reductions due to lapses of statutes of limitations |
(177 | ) | (384 | ) | (265 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 974 | $ | 997 | ||||||
The Company and its subsidiaries file numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the
United States as well as various foreign jurisdictions. The Companys U.S. federal income tax
returns for 2006 and subsequent years remain subject to examination. Additionally, net operating
loss carryforwards (NOLs) originating in years prior to 2006 could be subject to examination to
the extent of the loss carryforwards. All material foreign income tax matters have been concluded
for years through 2004. Undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are considered
to be permanently reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal or state income taxes
has been provided thereon.
F-26
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
Income before income tax expense is comprised of the following components for the years ended
December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Domestic operations |
$ | (6,709 | ) | $ | 13,891 | $ | 404 | |||||
Foreign operations |
7,298 | 11,665 | 18,010 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 589 | $ | 25,556 | $ | 18,414 | ||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) is comprised of the following components for the years ended December
31, (in thousands):
Federal | Foreign | State | Total | |||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | | $ | 3,460 | $ | 186 | $ | 3,646 | ||||||||
Deferred |
| (227 | ) | | (227 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | | $ | 3,233 | $ | 186 | $ | 3,419 | |||||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 73 | $ | 2,724 | $ | 510 | $ | 3,307 | ||||||||
Deferred |
| 381 | | 381 | ||||||||||||
$ | 73 | $ | 3,105 | $ | 510 | $ | 3,688 | |||||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 185 | $ | 5,559 | $ | 96 | $ | 5,840 | ||||||||
Deferred |
| 79 | | 79 | ||||||||||||
$ | 185 | $ | 5,638 | $ | 96 | $ | 5,919 | |||||||||
The differences between the amount of tax expense provided and the amount of tax expense computed
by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes for the years ended
December 31, are as follows (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Expected tax expense at the statutory federal rate |
$ | 206 | $ | 8,945 | $ | 6,261 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
3,119 | (5,105 | ) | (2,489 | ) | |||||||
State income taxes, net |
186 | 510 | 516 | |||||||||
Foreign tax rate differences |
(822 | ) | (1,302 | ) | (586 | ) | ||||||
Permanent differences |
322 | 198 | 2,572 | |||||||||
Resolution of state and foreign tax issues |
33 | 61 | (67 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment to net operating loss carryforwards |
| | (473 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
375 | 381 | 185 | |||||||||
3,419 | $ | 3,688 | $ | 5,919 | ||||||||
Income tax expense differs from the expected tax at statutory rates due primarily to the
change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and different tax rates in the various state
and foreign jurisdictions. In 2008, net operating loss carryforwards offset substantially all
domestic operation income before income tax for federal tax purposes.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had available domestic federal tax NOLs, which will expire, if
unused, as follows: $2.6 million in 2022; $10.9 million in 2023; $12.2 million in 2025, $4.0
million in 2026 and $3.1 million in 2029. The utilization of these NOLs could be subject to
significant limitation in the event of a change in ownership, as defined in the tax laws, which
might be caused by purchases or sales of the Companys securities by persons or groups now or in
the future having 5% or greater ownership of the Companys common stock.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the U.S. GAAP and tax
treatment of certain income and expense items. The Company must assess and make estimates regarding
the likelihood that the
F-27
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
deferred tax assets will be recovered. To the extent that it is determined the deferred tax assets
will not be recovered, a valuation allowance must be established for such assets. In making such a
determination, the Company must take into account positive and negative evidence, including
projections of future taxable income and assessments of potential tax planning strategies. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Companys valuation allowance was $20.7 million and $17.6 million,
respectively. The net deferred tax assets in 2009 and 2008 relate to foreign and certain state tax
items.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, are as follows (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Federal net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 11,461 | $ | 10,345 | ||||
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards |
2,787 | 2,794 | ||||||
State net operating loss carryforwards |
982 | 887 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
2,176 | 1,110 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
547 | 784 | ||||||
Foreign subsidiaries, primarily NOLs, pension and accrued expenses |
9,284 | 4,586 | ||||||
Other |
671 | 654 | ||||||
Total gross deferred tax assets |
27,908 | 21,160 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation |
(1,353 | ) | (1,483 | ) | ||||
Foreign deferred tax liabilities, primarily property and equipment |
(725 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance |
25,830 | 18,909 | ||||||
Less valuation allowance |
(20,679 | ) | (17,560 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 5,151 | $ | 1,349 | ||||
Current net deferred tax assets of $1.4 million and $0.4 million and long-term net deferred
tax assets of $3.7 million and $0.9 million were recorded at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In 2009 and 2008, deferred tax benefits of $3.4 million and $390 thousand,
respectively, related to changes in pension net actuarial loss and prior service credit were
recorded in other comprehensive income.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases vehicles, office space, office equipment and other items of personal property
under leases expiring at various dates. Management expects that, in the normal course of business,
leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases. Total rent expense incurred under
operating leases was $12.9 million for 2009, $13.8 million for 2008 and $8.2 million for 2007.
The Company has contracts with two suppliers which include minimum purchase requirements to keep the contracts in effect.
The aggregate minimum requirements over the next five years under the two contracts totals $10.0 million.
F-28
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
At December 31, 2009, future minimum rental commitments under all capital leases classified as
long-term debt and operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
Capital | Operating | |||||||
Leases | Leases | |||||||
2010 |
$ | 183 | $ | 7,473 | ||||
2011 |
100 | 6,157 | ||||||
2012 |
14 | 3,772 | ||||||
2013 |
14 | 2,232 | ||||||
2014 |
10 | 1,282 | ||||||
Thereafter |
4 | 3,233 | ||||||
Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 325 | $ | 24,149 | ||||
Less amounts representing interest |
(12 | ) | ||||||
Present value of future minimum lease payments |
$ | 313 | ||||||
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in
the United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although
the Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations,
there can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover,
it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws,
regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons
resulting from operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The
Company has recorded, in other liabilities, an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities
related to the remediation of site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount
of $1.3 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The
decrease in reserves in 2009 resulted from releases obtained on certain properties during the year.
Furmanite America, Inc, a subsidiary of the Company, is involved in disputes with two customers,
who are each negotiating with a governmental regulatory agency and claim that the subsidiary failed
to provide them with satisfactory services at the customers facilities. On April 17, 2009, a
customer, INEOS USA LLC, initiated legal action against the subsidiary in the Common Pleas Court of
Allen County, Ohio, alleging that the subsidiary and one of its former employees, who performed
data services at one of the customers facilities, breached its contract with the customer and
failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information to support the subsidiarys
work at the customers facility from 1998 through the second quarter of 2005. The customers
complaint seeks damages in an amount that the subsidiary believes represents the total proposed
civil penalty, plus the cost of unspecified supplemental environmental projects requested by the
regulatory agency to reduce air emissions at the customers facility, and also seeks unspecified
punitive damages. The subsidiary believes that it provided the customer with adequate and timely
information to support the subsidiarys work at the customers facilities and will vigorously
defend against the customers claim.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35
million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that
the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believes that the sales broker is an affiliate of
another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its
affiliates, against the subsidiary. The action to vacate the arbitration award has terminated and
in January 2010, the subsidiary paid the full amount of the arbitration award plus accrued interest
to the sales broker. In separate pending actions, the subsidiary is seeking to enforce the prior
settlement agreement executed by the sales brokers affiliate and obtain an equitable offset of the
arbitration award.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident
to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the
ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on the financial
position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or
determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $3.4
million and $2.4 million are recorded in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
F-29
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
12. Business Segment Data and Geographical Information
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief decision maker, or
decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. For
financial reporting purposes, the Company operates in a single segment.
The technical services segment provides technical services to an international client base that
includes petroleum refineries, chemical plants, pipelines, offshore drilling and production
platforms, steel mills, food and beverage processing facilities, power generation, and other
flow-process industries.
Geographical areas are the United States, Europe (which also includes operations of the United
Kingdoms subsidiaries in the Middle East and Africa) and Asia-Pacific. The following geographical
area information includes revenues by major service line and operating income (loss) based on the
physical location of the operations (in thousands):
United | Asia- | |||||||||||||||
States | Europe | Pacific | Total | |||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services |
$ | 44,268 | $ | 38,891 | $ | 15,365 | $ | 98,524 | ||||||||
Turnaround services |
57,073 | 54,084 | 16,120 | 127,277 | ||||||||||||
Other services |
20,301 | 26,236 | 3,602 | 50,139 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 121,642 | $ | 119,211 | $ | 35,087 | $ | 275,940 | ||||||||
Operating (loss) income 1 |
$ | (10,177 | ) | $ | 4,894 | $ | 6,817 | $ | 1,534 | |||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs |
7,593 | (5,863 | ) | (1,730 | ) | | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating (loss) income |
$ | (2,584 | ) | $ | (969 | ) | $ | 5,087 | $ | 1,534 | ||||||
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services |
$ | 48,701 | $ | 43,936 | $ | 10,948 | $ | 103,585 | ||||||||
Turnaround services |
74,703 | 81,672 | 17,976 | 174,351 | ||||||||||||
Other services |
23,641 | 16,108 | 3,257 | 43,006 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 147,045 | $ | 141,716 | $ | 32,181 | $ | 320,942 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 665 | $ | 20,690 | $ | 5,646 | $ | 27,001 | ||||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs |
6,901 | (5,599 | ) | (1,302 | ) | | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 7,566 | $ | 15,091 | $ | 4,344 | $ | 27,001 | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services |
$ | 44,380 | $ | 37,256 | $ | 9,452 | $ | 91,088 | ||||||||
Turnaround services |
61,934 | 74,636 | 19,531 | 156,101 | ||||||||||||
Other services |
22,002 | 18,832 | 2,264 | 43,098 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 128,316 | $ | 130,724 | $ | 31,247 | $ | 290,287 | ||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
$ | (5,342 | ) | $ | 18,991 | $ | 6,998 | $ | 20,647 | |||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs |
5,493 | (4,408 | ) | (1,085 | ) | | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 151 | $ | 14,583 | $ | 5,913 | $ | 20,647 | ||||||||
1 | Includes restructuring charges of $1.1 million. |
F-30
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
Included in the Europe geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
are United Kingdom revenues of $51.0 million, $72.3 million and $66.5 million, respectively, and
United Kingdom operating income of $6.1 million, $15.9 million and $14.3 million, respectively.
The following geographical area information includes total long-lived assets (which consist of all
non-current assets, other than goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and deferred tax
assets) based on physical location at December 31, (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
United States |
$ | 17,050 | $ | 17,298 | $ | 16,566 | ||||||
Europe |
11,248 | 9,375 | 10,550 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific |
3,717 | 2,898 | 3,007 | |||||||||
$ | 32,015 | $ | 29,571 | $ | 30,123 | |||||||
The Companys capital expenditures were $6.5 million, $8.0 million and $8.1 million for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in the Europe geographic region at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were United Kingdom property and equipment, net of $5.7 million,
$5.1 million and $6.2 million, respectively.
Considering the Companys global nature, and its exposure to foreign currencies, the financial
results in any geographical area can be impacted by changes in currency exchange rates in any given
year. In 2009, the financial results were favorably impacted in Europe and Australia but were
substantially offset by an unfavorable impact in the United States as a result of currency exchange
rate changes during the year. Conversely in 2008, financial results in Europe were unfavorably
impacted but again were substantially offset by a favorable impact in the United States.
13. Significant Customers
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the consolidated revenues during any of the past
three fiscal years.
14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Risk
Fair value is defined under FASB ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit
price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to
measure fair value under FASB ASC 820-10 must maximize the use of the observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard established a fair value hierarchy based on
three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.
| Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. | ||
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. | ||
| Level 3 Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances. |
The Company currently does not have any assets or liabilities that would require valuation under
FASB ASC 820-10, except for pension assets which is separately described in Note 7. The Company
does not have any derivatives or marketable securities.
F-31
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to
maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of all debt as of December 31, 2009 and
2008 approximated the carrying value. These fair values were estimated based on the Companys
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, when quoted market
prices were not available. The estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would
be realized in a current market exchange.
The Company provides services to an international client base that includes petroleum refineries,
chemical plants, offshore energy production platforms, steel mills, nuclear power stations,
conventional power stations, pulp and paper mills, food and beverage processing plants, other flow
process facilities as well as the U.S. government. The Company does not believe that it has a
significant concentration of credit risk at December 31, 2009, as the Companys accounts receivable
are generated from these business industries with customers located throughout the United States,
Europe and Asia-Pacific.
15. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly operating results for 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows (in thousands, except per
share data):
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 63,032 | $ | 69,726 | $ | 70,757 | $ | 72,425 | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) 1 |
$ | 1,640 | $ | 806 | $ | 1,586 | $ | (2,498 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) 2 |
$ | 880 | $ | 231 | $ | 203 | $ | (4,144 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 73,387 | $ | 90,185 | $ | 75,883 | $ | 81,487 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 5,225 | $ | 10,508 | $ | 6,560 | $ | 4,708 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,710 | $ | 7,659 | $ | 5,402 | $ | 5,097 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 |
1 | Operating loss for fourth quarter of 2009 includes restructuring charges of $1.1 million | |
2 | Net loss for fourth quarter of 2009 includes restructuring charges of $0.9 million |
16. Restructuring
On December 29, 2009, the Company committed to a cost reduction initiative, including planned
workforce reductions and consolidation of certain functions. The Company has taken these specific
actions in order to more favorably align its selling, general and administrative costs with its
current level of operations. The Company expects to complete these cost reduction actions during
2010, with the majority of these costs expected during the first quarter of 2010.
In connection with this plan, the Company has recorded estimated expenses for severance, lease
cancellations, and other restructuring costs in accordance with FASB ASC 420-10, Exit or Disposal
Cost Obligations and FASB ASC 712-10, Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.
F-32
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $1.1 million in restructuring charges,
which included $0.9 million for severance and benefits, $22.0 thousand for lease costs, and $0.2
million for other restructuring costs. Of these charges, $0.4 million and $0.7 million were
incurred in the United States and Europe, respectively, with only minimal restructuring costs
incurred in Asia-Pacific. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has severance and benefit
liabilities of $0.7 million included in accrued compensation and benefits which relates to 2009
charges expected to be paid primarily during the first quarter of 2010. Additional restructuring
costs in 2010 are expected to total approximately $2.3 million of which $1.2 million are expected
for severance and related costs, $0.6 million for lease termination costs and $0.5 million for
other restructuring costs. Of these estimated costs, $0.3 million are expected in the United States
and $2.0 million are expected in Europe. The total workforce reductions are expected to include
terminations for 108 employees, which include reductions of 26
employees in the United States, 81 employees in Europe, and one
employee in Asia-Pacific. The total amount expected to be
incurred in connection with the cost reduction initiative is $3.4 million, with the majority of
remaining expenses to be recognized in the first quarter of 2010.
F-33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
FURMANITE CORPORATION |
||||
By: | /s/ JOSEPH E. MILLIRON | |||
JOSEPH E. MILLIRON | ||||
Chief Operating Officer and President | ||||
Date: March 12, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and as of
the date indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ CHARLES R. COX
|
Chief Executive Officer and | March 12, 2010 | ||
CHARLES R. COX
|
Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
/s/ ROBERT S. MUFF
|
Chief Accounting Officer (principal | March 12, 2010 | ||
ROBERT S. MUFF
|
financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
/s/ SANGWOO AHN
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
SANGWOO AHN |
||||
/s/ KEVIN R. JOST
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
KEVIN R. JOST |
||||
/s/ HANS KESSLER
|
Director | March 12, 2010 | ||
HANS KESSLER |
F-34