Attached files

file filename
EX-21 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex21.htm
EX-23 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex23.htm
EX-32.1 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex32-2.htm
EX-31.1 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex31-2.htm
EX-18.1 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex18-1.htm
EX-10.19 - CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPv176922_ex10-19.htm

  

  

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



 

FORM 10-K



 

 
x   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

 
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-28190



 

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

 
Maine   01-0413282
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 
2 Elm Street, Camden, ME   04843
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (207) 236-8821



 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 
Title of Each Class   Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, without par value   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $239,304,337. Shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer, director and person who beneficially own 5% or more of the Registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded, in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of March 10, 2010 is: Common Stock: 7,653,780.

Listed hereunder are documents incorporated by reference and the relevant Part of the Form 10-K into which the document is incorporated by reference:

(1) Certain information required in response to Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Camden National Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and Regulations of the Commission.
 

 


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
  
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
PART I
        

Item 1.

Business

    1  

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

    11  

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

    15  

Item 2.

Properties

    15  

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

    16  

Item 4.

[RESERVED]

    16  
PART II
        

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

    17  

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

    19  

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

    20  

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

    42  

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

    43  

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

    87  

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

    87  

Item 9B.

Other Information

    87  
PART III
        

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

    88  

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

    88  

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

    88  

Item 13.

Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence

    88  

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

    88  
PART IV
        

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

    89  
Signatures     91  

i


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The discussions set forth below and in the documents we incorporate by reference herein contain certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may make written or oral forward-looking statements in other documents we file with the Securities Exchange Commission, in our annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “assume,” “will,” “should” and other expressions which predict or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate to historical matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Camden National Corporation to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Some of the factors that might cause these differences include, but are not limited to, the following:

general, national, regional or local economic conditions which are less favorable than anticipated, including continued global recession, impacting the performance our investment portfolio, quality of credits or the overall demand for services;
changes in loan default and charge-off rates could affect the allowance for credit losses;
declines in the equity and financial markets which could result in impairment of goodwill;
reductions in deposit levels could necessitate increased and/or higher cost borrowing to fund loans and investments;
declines in mortgage loan refinancing, equity loan and line of credit activity which could reduce net interest and non-interest income;
changes in the domestic interest rate environment and inflation, as substantially all of our assets and virtually all of the liabilities are monetary in nature;
changes in carrying value of investment securities and other assets;
further actions by the U.S. government and Treasury Department, similar to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation conservatorship, which could have a negative impact on the Company’s investment portfolio and earnings;
misalignment of our interest-bearing assets and liabilities;
increases in loan repayment rates affecting interest income and the value of mortgage servicing rights;
changing business, banking, or regulatory conditions or policies, or new legislation affecting the financial services industry, that could lead to changes in the competitive balance among financial institutions, restrictions on bank activities, changes in costs (including deposit insurance premiums), increased regulatory scrutiny, declines in consumer confidence in depository institutions, or changes in the secondary market for bank loan and other products; and
changes in accounting rules, Federal and State laws, IRS regulations, and other regulations and policies governing financial holding companies and their subsidiaries which may impact our ability to take appropriate action to protect our financial interests in certain loan situations.

You should carefully review all of these factors, and be aware that there may be other factors that could cause differences, including the risk factors listed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, beginning on page 11. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described therein and should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

ii


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans and estimates at the date of this report, and we do not promise to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

iii


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview.  Camden National Corporation (hereafter referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”) is a publicly-held bank holding company, with $2.2 billion in assets at December 31, 2009, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maine and headquartered in Camden, Maine. The Company, as a diversified financial services provider, pursues the objective of achieving long-term sustainable growth by balancing growth opportunities against profit, while mitigating risks inherent in the financial services industry. The primary business of the Company and its subsidiaries is to attract deposits from, and to extend loans to, consumer, institutional, municipal, non-profit and commercial customers. The Company makes its commercial and consumer banking products and services available directly and indirectly through its subsidiary, Camden National Bank (“Bank”), and the Bank’s division, Union Trust, and its brokerage and insurance services through Acadia Financial Consultants (“Acadia Financial”). The Company also provides wealth management, trust and employee benefit products and services through its subsidiary, Acadia Trust, N.A. (“Acadia Trust”), a federally regulated, non-depository trust company headquartered in Portland, Maine. In addition to serving as a holding company, the Company provides managerial, operational, human resource, marketing, financial management, risk management and technology services to its subsidiaries. The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company accompanying this Form 10-K include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and its divisions, and Acadia Trust. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On January 3, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Union Bankshares Company of Ellsworth, Maine, including its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Trust Company. Immediately after the acquisition, Union Trust Company was merged into the Bank. The financial results of Union Bankshares Company are included in the Company’s results beginning on the January 3, 2008 acquisition date.

Descriptions of the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries

The Company.  Following is a timeline of major recent events of the Company:

In January 1985, the Company was founded following a corporate reorganization in which the shareholders of the Bank exchanged shares of the Bank stock for shares in the Company, at which time it became the Bank’s parent.
In December 1995, the Company merged with UnitedCorp, a bank holding company, and acquired 100% of United Bank and 51% of the outstanding stock of the Trust Company of Maine, Inc.
On December 20, 1999, the Company acquired KSB Bancorp, Inc., a publicly-held, bank holding company with one principal subsidiary, Kingfield Savings Bank.
On February 4, 2000, United Bank and Kingfield Savings Bank were merged to form UnitedKingfield Bank.
On July 19, 2001, the Company acquired Acadia Trust and Gouws Capital Management, Inc., which was merged into AT on December 31, 2001.
On October 24, 2001, the Company acquired the remaining minority interest in Trust Company of Maine, Inc.
On January 1, 2003, Trust Company of Maine, Inc. merged with Acadia Trust, with Acadia Trust remaining as the surviving entity.
On September 30, 2006, UnitedKingfield Bank was merged into the Bank.
On January 3, 2008 the Company acquired Union Bankshares Company, Maine, including its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Trust Company.

As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s securities consisted of one class of common stock, no par value, of which there were 7,644,837 shares outstanding held of record by approximately 1,400 shareholders.

1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Such number of record holders does not reflect the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee name through banks, brokerage firms and other nominees, which is estimated to be 3,500 shareholders.

The Company is a bank holding company (“BHC”) registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”).

Camden National Bank.  The Bank, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a national banking association chartered under the laws of the United States and having its principal office in Camden, Maine. Originally founded in 1875, the Bank became a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company as a result of the January 1985 corporate reorganization. The Bank offers its products and services in the Maine counties of Androscoggin, Cumberland, Franklin, Knox, Lincoln, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Somerset, Waldo and York, and focuses primarily on attracting deposits from the general public through its branches, and then using such deposits to originate residential mortgage loans, commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans and a variety of consumer loans. Customers may also access the Bank’s products and services using other channels, including the Bank’s website located at www.camdennational.com. The Bank is a member bank of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) insures the deposits of the Bank up to the maximum amount permitted by law.

Union Trust, a Division of Camden National Bank.  As a result of the acquisition of Union Trust, the Bank operates nine Union Trust branches located throughout Hancock and Washington counties, Maine, and a website located at www.uniontrust.com, with the same business purposes as the Bank branches.

Acadia Financial Consultants, a Division of Camden National Bank.  Acadia Financial is a full-service brokerage and insurance division of the Bank, which is in the business of helping clients meet all their financial needs by using a total wealth management approach. Its financial offerings include college, retirement, and estate planning, mutual funds, Strategic Asset Management accounts, and variable and fixed annuities.

Acadia Trust, N.A.  Acadia Trust, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a national banking association chartered under the laws of the United States with a limited purpose trust charter, and has its principal office in Portland, Maine, and a website located at www.acadiatrust.com. Acadia Trust provides a broad range of trust, trust-related, investment and wealth management services, in addition to retirement and pension plan management services, to both individual and institutional clients. The financial services provided by Acadia Trust complement the services provided by the Bank by offering customers investment management services. Acadia Trust is a member bank of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the OCC as well as to supervision, examination and reporting requirements under the BHC Act and the regulations of the FRB.

Competition.  Through the Bank and its divisions Union Trust and Acadia Financial, the Company competes throughout the State of Maine, and considers its primary market areas to be in Hancock, Knox, Waldo, Penobscot, Washington and Androscoggin counties, with a growing presence in Cumberland, Lincoln and York counties. The combined population of the two primary counties of Knox and Waldo is approximately 80,000 people and their economies are based primarily on tourism and fishing and supported by a substantial population of retirees. The Bank’s downeast, central and western Maine markets are characterized as rural areas, with the exception of Bangor and Lewiston, which have populations of approximately 32,000 and 36,000 respectively. Major competitors in the Company’s market areas include local branches of large regional bank affiliates and brokerage houses, as well as local independent banks, financial advisors, thrift institutions and credit unions. Other competitors for deposits and loans within the Bank’s primary market areas include insurance companies, money market funds, consumer finance companies and financing affiliates of consumer durable goods manufacturers.

The Company and its banking subsidiary generally have been able to effectively compete with other financial institutions by emphasizing customer service, which it has branded the Camden National Experience, including local decision-making, establishing long-term customer relationships, building customer loyalty and providing products and services designed to meet the needs of customers. No assurance can be given,

2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

however, that in the future, the Company and its banking subsidiary will continue to be able to effectively compete with other financial institutions. The Company, through its non-bank subsidiary, Acadia Trust, competes for trust, trust-related, investment management, retirement and pension plan management services with local banks and non-banks, which may now, or in the future, offer a similar range of services, as well as with a number of brokerage firms and investment advisors with offices in the Company’s market area. In addition, most of these services are widely available to the Company’s customers by telephone and over the internet through firms located outside the Company’s market area.

The Company’s Philosophy.  The Company is committed to the philosophy of serving the financial needs of customers in local communities, as described in its core purpose: Through each interaction, we will enrich the lives of people, help businesses succeed and vitalize communities. The Company, through the Bank, has branches that are located in communities within the Company’s geographic market areas. The Company believes that its comprehensive retail, small business and commercial loan products enable the Bank to effectively compete. No single person or group of persons provides a material portion of the Company’s deposits, the loss of any one or more of which would have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Company, and no material portion of the Company’s loans are concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries.

The Company’s Growth.  The Company has achieved a five-year compounded annual asset growth rate of 7.9%, resulting in $2.2 billion in total assets as of the end of 2009. The primary factors contributing to the growth were the acquisition of Union Trust, increases in security investments and retail lending activities at the Bank. The financial services industry continues to experience consolidations through mergers that could create opportunities for the Company to promote its value proposition to customers. The Company evaluates the possibility of expansion into new markets through both de novo expansion and acquisitions. In addition, the Company is focused on maximizing the potential for growth in existing markets, especially in markets where the Company has less of a presence.

The Company’s Employees.  The Company employs approximately 421 people on a full- or part-time basis, which calculates into 394 people on a full-time equivalent basis. The Company’s management measures the corporate culture every 12 months and is pleased with the most recent rating, which came in as a “positive” culture, signifying that employees understand and support the overall Company objectives and strategies. In 2009, the Company was named one of the top two “Best Places to Work in Maine” in the large-size category (200 or more employees) by ModernThink, a workplace excellence firm. There are no known disputes between management and employees.

The Company’s Employee Incentives.  All Company employees are eligible for participation in the Company’s performance-based incentive compensation program and Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan, while certain officers of the Company may also participate in various components of the Company’s 2003 Stock Option Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Postretirement Medical Plan, Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, Executive Incentive Compensation Program, Deferred Compensation Plan and Long-term Incentive Plan.

Supervision and Regulation

The business in which the Company and its subsidiaries are engaged is subject to extensive supervision, regulation and examination by various federal regulatory agencies (the “Agencies”), including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and the OCC. The Bank, is also subject to regulation under the laws of the State of Maine and the jurisdiction of the Maine Bureau of Financial Institutions. State and federal banking laws generally have as their principal objective either the maintenance of the safety and soundness of financial institutions and the federal deposit insurance system or the protection of consumers or classes of consumers, and depositors in particular, rather than the specific protection of shareholders. Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations that relate to the regulation of the Company and its banking subsidiaries. In response to the deterioration of the financial markets in 2008, comprehensive financial regulatory reform proposals are pending in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate which may be adopted in whole or in part in 2010. These proposals would restructure the regulatory regime for financial institutions and impose significant additional requirements and restrictions on banks and bank holding companies. To the extent the following material describes statutory or regulatory provisions; it is

3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. Any change in applicable law or regulation may have a material effect on the Company’s business and operations, as well as those of its subsidiaries.

Bank Holding Company — Activities and Other Limitations.  As a BHC, the Company is subject to regulation under the BHCA. In addition, the Company is subject to examination and supervision by the FRB, and is required to file reports with, and provide additional information requested by, the FRB. The enforcement powers available to federal banking regulators include, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities. Under certain circumstances, federal and state law requires public disclosure and reports of certain criminal offenses and also enforcement actions by the Agencies.

Under the BHCA, the Company may not generally engage in activities or acquire more than 5% of any class of voting securities of any company which is not a bank or BHC, and may not engage directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to its subsidiary banks, except that it may engage in and may own shares of companies engaged in certain activities the FRB determined to be so closely related to banking or managing and controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. However, a BHC that has elected to be treated as a “financial holding company” may engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to such financial activities, as determined by the FRB alone, or together with the Secretary of the Department of the Treasury. The Company has not elected “financial holding company” status. Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to give notice to or seek approval of the FRB before engaging in activities other than banking.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Riegle-Neal”) permits adequately or well capitalized and adequately or well managed BHCs, as determined by the FRB, to acquire banks in any state subject to certain concentration limits and other conditions. Riegle-Neal also generally authorizes the interstate merger of banks. In addition, among other things, Riegle-Neal permits banks to establish new branches on an interstate basis provided that the law of the host state specifically authorizes such action. However, as a BHC, we are required to obtain prior FRB approval before acquiring more than 5% of a class of voting securities, or substantially all of the assets, of a BHC, bank or savings association.

The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a BHC, such as the Company, unless the FRB has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the FRB, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting securities of a BHC with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the BHC. In addition, a company is required to obtain the approval of the FRB under the BHCA before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is a BHC) or more of any class of outstanding voting securities of a BHC, or otherwise obtaining control or a “controlling influence” over that BHC. In September 2008, the FRB released guidance on minority investment in banks which relaxed the presumption of control for investments of greater than 10% of a class of outstanding voting securities of a BHC in certain instances discussed in the guidance.

Activities and Investments of National Banking Associations.  National banking associations must comply with the National Bank Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the OCC, which limit the activities of national banking associations to those that are deemed to be part of, or incidental to, the “business of banking.” Activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking include taking deposits, borrowing and lending money and discounting or negotiating paper. Subsidiaries of national banking associations generally may only engage in activities permissible for the parent national bank.

Bank Holding Company Support of Subsidiary Banks.  Under FRB policy, a BHC is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiaries and to commit resources to their support. This support may be required at times when the BHC may not have the resources to provide it. Similarly, under the cross-guarantee provisions of Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (the “FDIA”), the FDIC can hold any FDIC-insured depository institution liable for any loss suffered or anticipated by the

4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FDIC in connection with (1) the “default” of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution; or (2) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution “in danger of default.”

Transactions with Affiliates.  Under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W promulgated thereunder, there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a BHC and its nonbank subsidiaries may borrow, obtain credit from or otherwise engage in “covered transactions” with its FDIC-insured depository institution subsidiaries. Such borrowings and other covered transactions by an insured depository institution subsidiary (and its subsidiaries) with its nondepository institution affiliates are limited to the following amounts: in the case of one such affiliate, the aggregate amount of covered transactions of the insured depository institution and its subsidiaries cannot exceed 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the insured depository institution; and in the case of all affiliates, the aggregate amount of covered transactions of the insured depository institution and its subsidiaries cannot exceed 20% of the capital stock and surplus of the insured depository institution. “Covered transactions” are defined by statute for these purposes to include a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate, a purchase of or investment in securities issued by an affiliate, a purchase of assets from an affiliate unless exempted by the FRB, the acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as collateral for a loan or extension of credit to any person or company, or the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. Covered transactions are also subject to certain collateral security requirements. Further, a BHC and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property of any kind, or furnishing of any service.

Declaration of Dividends.  According to its Policy Statement on Cash Dividends Not Fully Covered by Earnings (the “FRB Dividend Policy”), the FRB considers adequate capital to be critical to the health of individual banking organizations and to the safety and stability of the banking system. Of course, one of the major components of the capital adequacy of a bank or a BHC is the strength of its earnings, and the extent to which its earnings are retained and added to capital or paid to shareholders in the form of cash dividends. Accordingly, the FRB Dividend Policy suggests that banks and BHCs generally should not maintain their existing rate of cash dividends on common stock unless the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB Dividend Policy reiterates the FRB’s belief that a BHC should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its shareholders that places undue pressure on the capital of bank subsidiaries, or that can be funded only through additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the BHC’s ability to serve as a source of strength.

Under Maine law, a corporation’s board of directors may declare, and the corporation may pay, dividends on its outstanding shares, in cash or other property, generally only out of the corporation’s unreserved and unrestricted earned surplus, or out of the unreserved and unrestricted net earnings of the current fiscal year and the next preceding fiscal year taken as a single period, except under certain circumstances, including when the corporation is insolvent, or when the payment of the dividend would render the corporation insolvent or when the declaration would be contrary to the corporation’s charter.

Dividend payments by national banks, such as the Bank, also are subject to certain restrictions. For instance, national banks generally may not declare a dividend in excess of the bank’s undivided profits and, absent OCC approval, if the total amount of dividends declared by the national bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of the national bank’s retained net income of that year to date combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years. National banks also are prohibited from declaring or paying any dividend if, after making the dividend, the national bank would be considered “undercapitalized” (defined by reference to other OCC regulations). Federal bank regulatory agencies have authority to prohibit banking institutions from paying dividends if those agencies determine that, based on the financial condition of the bank, such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The FDIC has the authority to use its enforcement powers to prohibit a bank from paying dividends if, in its opinion, the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Federal law also prohibits the payment of dividends by a bank that will result in the bank failing to meet its applicable capital requirements on a pro forma basis.

5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Capital Requirements.  The FRB and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to United States banking organizations. In addition, the Agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels, whether because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.

The FRB risk-based guidelines define a three-tier capital framework. Tier 1 capital includes common shareholders’ equity and qualifying preferred stock, less goodwill and other adjustments. Tier 2 capital consists of preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, mandatory convertible debt, limited amounts of subordinated debt, other qualifying term debt and the allowance for loan losses up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 3 capital includes subordinated debt that is unsecured, fully paid, has an original maturity of at least two years, is not redeemable before maturity without prior approval by the FRB and includes a lock-in clause precluding payment of either interest or principal if the payment would cause the issuing bank’s risk-based capital ratio to fall or remain below the required minimum. The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital less investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries represents qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing Tier 1 and total capital by risk-weighted assets. Assets and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to one of four categories of risk-weights, based primarily on relative credit risk. The minimum Tier 1 capital ratio is 4% and the minimum total capital ratio is 8%. The Company’s Tier 1 capital ratio as of December 31, 2009 equaled 12.24%.

The leverage ratio is determined by dividing Tier 1 capital by adjusted average total assets. Although the stated minimum ratio is 3%, as a matter of policy the actual minimum is 100 to 200 basis points above 3%. Banking organizations must maintain a ratio of at least 5% to be classified as “well capitalized.” The Company’s leverage ratio as of December 31, 2009 was 8.17%.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (the “FDICIA”), among other things, identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) and requires the Agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements within such categories. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Failure to meet the capital guidelines could also subject a banking institution to capital raising requirements. An “undercapitalized” bank must develop a capital restoration plan and its parent holding company must guarantee that bank’s compliance with the plan. The liability of the parent holding company under any such guarantee is limited to the lesser of 5% of the bank’s assets at the time it became “undercapitalized” or the amount needed to comply with the plan. Furthermore, in the event of the bankruptcy of the parent holding company, such guarantee would take priority over the parent’s general unsecured creditors. In addition, the FDICIA requires the Agencies to prescribe certain non-capital standards for safety and soundness relating generally to operations and management, asset quality and executive compensation, and permits regulatory action against a financial institution that does not meet such standards.

The Agencies have adopted substantially similar regulations that define the five capital categories identified by the FDICIA using the total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios as the relevant capital measures. Such regulations establish various degrees of corrective action to be taken when an institution is considered undercapitalized. Under the regulations, a bank generally shall be deemed to be:

“well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive;
“adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater, has a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater (3.0% under certain circumstances) and does not meet the definition of “well capitalized;”
“undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio that is less than 4.0% (3.0% under certain circumstances);

6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3.0% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3.0%; and
“critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.

Regulators also must take into consideration (1) concentrations of credit risk; (2) interest rate risk (when the interest rate sensitivity of an institution’s assets does not match the sensitivity of its liabilities or its off-balance-sheet position); and (3) risks from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage those risks, when determining the adequacy of an institution’s capital. This evaluation will be made as a part of the institution’s regular safety and soundness examination. In addition, the Company, and any bank with significant trading activity, must incorporate a measure for market risk into their regulatory capital calculations.

At December 31, 2009, the Company’s subsidiary bank was deemed to be a “well capitalized” institution for the above purposes. The Agencies may raise capital requirements applicable to banking organizations beyond current levels. The Company is unable to predict whether higher capital requirements will be imposed and, if so, at what levels and on what schedules. Therefore, the Company cannot predict what effect such higher requirements may have on it. As is discussed above, the Company’s subsidiary bank would be required to remain a well capitalized institution at all times if the Company elected to be treated as an FHC.

Information concerning the Company and its subsidiaries with respect to capital requirements is incorporated by reference from Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the section entitled “Capital Resources,” and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, the section entitled Note 19, Regulatory Capital Requirements.

An institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan which meets specified requirements with an appropriate federal banking agency within 45 days of the date that the institution receives notice or is deemed to have notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. An institution which is required to submit a capital restoration plan must concurrently submit a performance guaranty by each company that controls the institution. A critically undercapitalized institution generally is to be placed in conservatorship or receivership within 90 days unless the federal banking agency determines to take such other action (with the concurrence of the FDIC) that would better protect the deposit insurance fund. Immediately upon becoming undercapitalized, the institution becomes subject to the provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, including for example, (i) restricting payment of capital distributions and management fees, (ii) requiring that the appropriate federal banking agency monitor the condition of the institution and its efforts to restore its capital, (iii) requiring submission of a capital restoration plan, (iv) restricting the growth of the institution’s assets and (v) requiring prior approval of certain expansion proposals.

The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to calculate their capital requirements and ratios under Basel II, an international standard regarding how much capital banks need to guard against financial and operational risks banks face, or in accordance with the Standardized Approach Proposal, which sets out specific risk weights for certain types of credit risk.

Other Regulatory Requirements

Customer Information Security.  The Agencies have adopted final guidelines for establishing standards for safeguarding nonpublic personal information about customers. These guidelines implement provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “GLBA”), which establishes a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the BHCA framework. Specifically, the Information Security Guidelines established by the GLBA require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, to protect against anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and to protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. The federal banking regulators have issued guidance for banks on response

7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

programs for unauthorized access to customer information. This guidance, among other things, requires notice to be sent to customers whose “sensitive information” has been compromised if unauthorized use of this information is “reasonably possible.” A majority of states have enacted legislation concerning breaches of data security and Congress is considering federal legislation that would require consumer notice of data security breaches.

Privacy.  The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires financial institutions to explain to consumers their policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, unless otherwise required or permitted by law, financial institutions are prohibited from disclosing such information except as provided in their policies and procedures.

USA PATRIOT Act.  The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain anonymous access to the U.S. financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, broker-dealers, mutual funds, insurance companies and businesses of other types involved in the transfer of money. The USA PATRIOT Act, together with the implementing regulations of various Agencies, has caused financial institutions, including banks, to adopt and implement additional, or amend existing, policies and procedures with respect to, among other things, anti-money laundering compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting, customer identity verification and customer risk analysis. The statute and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the FRB (and other Agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant and a target institution in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or under the Bank Merger Act. In 2006, final regulations under the USA PATRIOT Act were issued requiring financial institutions, including the Company and its subsidiaries, to take additional steps to monitor their correspondent banking and private banking relationships as well as their relationships with “shell banks.” Management believes that the Company is in compliance with all the requirements prescribed by the USA PATRIOT Act and all applicable final implementing regulations.

Deposit Insurance.  The Bank pays deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC based on an assessment rate established by the FDIC. For most banks and savings associations, including the Bank, FDIC rates depend upon a combination of CAMELS component ratings and financial ratios. CAMELS ratings reflect the applicable bank regulatory agency’s evaluation of the financial institution’s capital, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to risk. For large banks and savings associations that have long-term debt issuer ratings, assessment rates depend upon such ratings, and CAMELS component ratings. For institutions which are in the lowest risk category, assessment rates varied initially from 10 to 16 basis points per $100 of insured deposits.

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule that mandated that insured depository institutions prepay their quarterly risk-based assessments to the FDIC for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012 on December 30, 2009. The amount of the Bank’s prepaid deposit premium was $8.7 million as of December 31, 2009. Each institution, including the Bank, recorded the entire amount of its prepayment as an asset (a prepaid expense). The prepaid assessments bear a 0% risk weight for risk-based capital purposes. The prepaid assessment base for the Bank was calculated using its third quarter 2009 assessment rate (using its CAMELS rating on that date). That assessment base will be adjusted quarterly with an estimated 5% annual growth in the assessment base through the end of 2012. The prepaid assessment rate for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for 2010 is based on the Bank’s total base assessment rate for the third quarter of 2009, adjusted as if the assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009 had been in effect for the entire third quarter. Further, the prepaid assessment rate for 2011 and 2012 is equal to the adjusted third quarter 2009 total base assessment rate plus 3 basis points. As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, the Bank will record an expense for its regular quarterly assessment for the quarter and a corresponding credit to the prepaid assessment until the asset is exhausted. The FDIC will not refund or collect additional prepaid assessments because of a decrease or growth in deposits over the next three years. However, should the prepaid assessment not be exhausted after collection of the amount due on June 30, 2013, the remaining amount of the

8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

prepayment will be returned to the Bank. In 2008, the level of FDIC deposit insurance was temporarily increased from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor and the increased level of insurance coverage will remain in effect through December 31, 2013.

The FDIC has the power to adjust deposit insurance assessment rates at any time. We cannot predict whether, as a result of the adverse change in U.S. economic conditions and, in particular, declines in the value of real estate in certain markets served by the Bank, the FDIC will in the future further increase deposit insurance assessment levels.

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.  The Bank is participating in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”) component of the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”). Through the TAGP, the FDIC will provide unlimited deposit insurance coverage for all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts through June 30, 2010. This includes traditional non-interest bearing checking accounts, certain types of attorney trust accounts and NOW accounts as long as the interest rate does not exceed 0.50%. The TAGP carries an annualized 10 basis point assessment, paid quarterly, on any deposit amounts exceeding the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. This assessment shall be in addition to an institution’s risk-based assessment noted above.

The Community Reinvestment Act.  The Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) requires lenders to identify the communities served by the institution’s offices and other deposit taking facilities and to make loans and investments and provide services that meet the credit needs of these communities. Regulatory agencies examine banks and rate such institutions’ compliance with the CRA as “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” Failure of an institution to receive at least a “Satisfactory” rating could inhibit such institution or its holding company from undertaking certain activities, including engaging in activities newly permitted as a financial holding company under the GLBA and acquisitions of other financial institutions. The FRB must take into account the record of performance of banks in meeting the credit needs of the entire community served, including low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Bank has achieved a rating of “Outstanding” on its most recent examination.

Regulation R.  The FRB approved Regulation R implementing the bank broker push out provisions under Title II of the GLBA. The GLBA provided 11 exceptions from the definition of “broker” in the Exchange Act that permit banks not registered as broker-dealers with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to effect securities transactions under certain conditions. Regulation R, which was issued jointly by the SEC and the FRB, implements certain of these exceptions. The Bank began compliance with Regulation R on the first day of the bank’s fiscal quarter starting after September 30, 2008. The FRB and the SEC have stated that they will jointly issue any interpretations or no-action letters/guidance regarding Regulation R and consult with each other and the appropriate federal banking agency with respect to formal enforcement actions pursuant to Regulation R.

Regulatory Enforcement Authority.  The enforcement powers available to the Agencies include, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities. Under certain circumstances, federal and state law requires public disclosure and reports of certain criminal offenses and also final enforcement actions by the Agencies.

Identity Theft Red Flags.  The Agencies jointly issued final rules and guidelines in 2007 implementing Section 114 (“Section 114”) of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (the “FACT Act”) and final rules implementing section 315 of the FACT Act (“Section 315”). Section 114 requires the Bank to develop and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program (the “Program”) to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft in connection with the opening of certain accounts or certain existing accounts. Section 114 also requires credit and debit card issuers to assess the validity of notifications of changes of address under certain circumstances. The Agencies issued joint rules under Section 315 that provide guidance regarding reasonable policies and procedures that a user of consumer reports must employ when a consumer reporting agency sends the user a notice of address discrepancy. These final rules and guidelines became effective on January 1, 2008 and the Bank began complying with the rules by November 1, 2008.

9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fair Credit Reporting Affiliate Marketing Regulations.  In 2007, the Agencies published final rules to implement the affiliate marketing provisions in Section 214 of the FACT Act, which amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The final rules generally prohibit a person from using information received from an affiliate to make a solicitation for marketing purposes to a consumer, unless the consumer is given notice and a reasonable opportunity and a reasonable and simple method to opt out of the making of such solicitations. These rules became effective on January 1, 2008 and the Company began complying with the rules by October 1, 2008.

Available Information

The Company’s Investor Relations information can be obtained through its subsidiary banks’ internet address, www.camdennational.com. The Company makes available on or through its Investor Relations page without charge, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The Company’s reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Company makes available, free of charge, its press releases and Code of Ethics through the Company’s Investor Relations page. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this document and should not be considered part of this Report.

10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Recent market volatility may impact our business and the value of our common stock.

Our business performance and the trading price of shares of our common stock may be affected by many factors affecting financial institutions, including the recent volatility in the credit, mortgage and housing markets, the markets for securities relating to mortgages or housing, and the value of debt and mortgage-backed and other securities that we hold in our investment portfolio. Government action and legislation may also impact us and the value of our common stock. Given the unprecedented nature of this volatility, we cannot predict what impact, if any, it will have on our business or share price and for these and other reasons our shares of common stock may trade at a price lower than that at which they were purchased.

If we do not maintain net income growth, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

Our return on shareholders’ equity and other measures of profitability, which affect the market price of our common stock, depend in part on our continued growth and expansion. Our growth strategy has two principal components — internal growth and external growth. Our ability to generate internal growth is affected by the competitive factors described below as well as by the primarily rural characteristics and related demographic features of the markets we serve. Our ability to continue to identify and invest in suitable acquisition candidates on acceptable terms is an important component of our external growth strategy. In pursuing acquisition opportunities, we may be in competition with other companies having similar growth strategies. As a result, we may not be able to identify or acquire promising acquisition candidates on acceptable terms. Competition for these acquisitions could result in increased acquisition prices and a diminished pool of acquisition opportunities. An inability to find suitable acquisition candidates at reasonable prices could slow our growth rate and have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

Interest rate volatility may reduce our profitability.

Our profitability depends to a large extent upon our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income can be affected significantly by changes in market interest rates. In particular, changes in relative interest rates may reduce our net interest income as the difference between interest income and interest expense decreases. As a result, we have adopted asset and liability management policies to minimize the potential adverse effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income, primarily by altering the mix and maturity of loans, investments and funding sources. However, there can be no assurance that a change in interest rates will not negatively impact our results from operations or financial position. Since market interest rates may change by differing magnitudes and at different times, significant changes in interest rates over an extended period of time could reduce overall net interest income. An increase in interest rates could also have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations, which could not only result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures and write-offs, but also necessitate further increases to our allowance for loan losses.

If our allowance for loan losses is not adequate to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for probable loan losses based on a number of factors. Monthly, the Corporate Risk Management group reviews the assumptions, calculation methodology and balance of the allowance for loan losses with the board of directors for the bank subsidiary. On a quarterly basis, the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as the board of directors for the subsidiary bank, completes a similar review of the allowance for loan losses. If the assumptions are incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover the losses we could experience, which would have an adverse effect on operating results, and may also cause us to increase the allowance for loan losses in the future. In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provisions for credit losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by regulatory authorities could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. If additional amounts are provided to the allowance for loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our loans are concentrated in certain areas of Maine and adverse conditions in those markets could adversely affect our operations.

We are exposed to real estate and economic factors throughout Maine, as virtually the entire loan portfolio is concentrated among borrowers in Maine, with higher concentrations of exposure in Cumberland, Hancock, Knox and Waldo counties. Further, because a substantial portion of the loan portfolio is secured by real estate in this area, the value of the associated collateral is also subject to regional real estate market conditions. Adverse economic, political or business developments or natural hazards may affect these areas and the ability of property owners in these areas to make payments of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages. If these regions experience adverse economic, political or business conditions, we would likely experience higher rates of loss and delinquency on these loans than if the loans were more geographically diverse.

We experience strong competition within our markets, which may impact our profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is strong. In our market areas, we compete for loans, deposits and other financial products and services with local independent banks, thrift institutions, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally as well as nationally. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than those of our subsidiaries and may offer services that our subsidiaries do not or cannot provide. Our long-term success depends on the ability of our subsidiaries to compete successfully with other financial institutions in their service areas. Because we maintain a smaller staff and have fewer financial and other resources than larger institutions with which we compete, we may be limited in our ability to attract customers. If we are unable to attract and retain customers, we may be unable to achieve growth in the loan and core deposit portfolios, and our results of operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted.

Our banking business is highly regulated, and we may be adversely affected by changes in law and regulation.

Bank holding companies and national banking associations operate in a highly regulated environment and are subject to supervision, regulation and examination by various federal regulatory agencies, as well as other governmental agencies in the states in which they operate. Federal and state laws and regulations govern numerous matters including changes in the ownership or control of banks and BHCs, maintenance of adequate capital and the financial condition of a financial institution, permissible types, amounts and terms of extensions of credit and investments, permissible non-banking activities, the level of reserves against deposits and restrictions on dividend payments. The OCC possesses cease and desist powers to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law by banks subject to their regulation, and the FRB possesses similar powers with respect to BHCs. These and other restrictions limit the manner in which we may conduct business and obtain financing.

Our business is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the economic, fiscal and monetary policies of the United States and its agencies and regulatory authorities, particularly the FRB. The economic and fiscal policies of various governmental entities and the monetary policies of the FRB may affect the interest rates our bank subsidiary must offer to attract deposits and the interest rates they must charge on loans, as well as the manner in which they offer deposits and make loans. These economic, fiscal and monetary policies have had, and are expected to continue to have, significant effects on the operating results of depository institutions generally, including our bank subsidiary.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, interest rates and competitive pressures.

Our banking subsidiary has traditionally obtained funds principally through deposits and borrowings. As a general matter, deposits are a less costly source of funds than borrowings because interest rates paid for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market interest rates, competitive pressures or otherwise, the value of deposits at our banking subsidiary decreases relative to our overall banking operations, we may have to rely more heavily on borrowings as a source of funds in the future.

12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We are subject to liquidity risk.

Liquidity risk is the risk of potential loss if we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost. Our liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or by unforeseen outflows of cash. This situation may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties or us. Our credit ratings are important to our liquidity. A reduction in our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position, increase our borrowing costs, limit our access to the capital markets or trigger unfavorable contractual obligations.

Our access to funds from subsidiaries may be restricted.

The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from our banking and nonbanking subsidiaries. We therefore depend on dividends, distributions and other payments from our banking and nonbanking subsidiaries to fund dividend payments on the common stock and to fund all payments on our other obligations. Our subsidiaries are subject to laws that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds from those subsidiaries to the Company, which could impede access to funds we need to make payments on our obligations or dividend payments.

We have credit and counter-party risk inherent in our securities portfolio and bank-owned life insurance policies.

We maintain a diversified securities portfolio, which includes mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government and government sponsored agencies, obligations of the U.S. Treasury and government-sponsored agencies, securities issued by state and political subdivisions, private issue collateralized mortgage obligations and auction preferred securities. We also carry investments in bank-owned life insurance and Federal Home Loan Bank stock. We seek to limit credit losses in our securities portfolios by generally purchasing only highly-rated securities.

The current economic environment and recent volatility of financial markets increase the difficulty of assessing investment securities impairment and the same influences tend to increase the risk of potential impairment of these assets. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded charges for other-than-temporary impairment of securities of $11.0 thousand. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded charges for other-than-temporary impairment of securities of $15.0 million. We believe that we have adequately reviewed our investment securities for impairment and that our investment securities are carried at fair value. However, over time, the economic and market environment may provide additional insight regarding the fair value of certain securities, which could change our judgment regarding impairment. In addition, if the counter-party should default, become insolvent, declare bankruptcy, or otherwise cease to exist, the value of our investment may be impaired. This could result in realized losses relating to other-than-temporary declines being charged against future income. Given the current market conditions and the significant judgments involved, there is continuing risk that further declines in fair value may occur and additional material other-than-temporary impairments may be charged to income in future periods, resulting in realized losses.

Increases in FDIC deposit insurance premiums will increase our non-interest expense.

On December 16, 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule, which took effect on January 1, 2009, increasing the deposit insurance assessment rate by seven cents per $100 of deposits. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted another final rule, effective as of April 1, 2009, that, among other things, changed the way that the FDIC’s assessment system differentiates for risk and makes corresponding changes to assessment rates. As a result, our base assessment rate increased on April 1, 2009. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions. The special assessment amounted to 5 basis points on each institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a maximum equal to 10 basis points times the institution’s assessment base. The Bank’s special assessment in the aggregate amounted to $1.1 million. The increase in our deposit insurance premiums will result in an increase in our non-interest expense.

13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We could be held responsible for environmental liabilities of properties we acquire through foreclosure.

If we are forced to foreclose on a defaulted mortgage loan to recover our investment, we may be subject to environmental liabilities related to the underlying real property. Hazardous substances or wastes, contaminants, pollutants or sources thereof may be discovered on properties during our ownership or after a sale to a third party. The amount of environmental liability could exceed the value of the real property. There can be no assurance that we would not be fully liable for the entire cost of any removal and clean-up on an acquired property, that the cost of removal and clean-up would not exceed the value of the property, or that we could recoup any of the costs from any third party.

Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to litigation from time to time, some of which may not be covered by insurance.

As a holding company and through our bank subsidiary, we operate in a highly regulated industry, and as a result, are subject to various regulations related to disclosures to our customers, our lending practices, and other fiduciary responsibilities, including those to our shareholders. From time to time, we have been, and may become, subject to legal actions relating to our operations that have had, or could, involve claims for substantial monetary damages. Although we maintain insurance, the scope of this coverage may not provide us with full, or even partial, coverage in any particular case. As a result, a judgment against us in any such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.

We are subject to reputational risk.

Our actual or perceived failure to (a) identify and address potential conflicts of interest, ethical issues, money-laundering, or privacy issues; (b) meet legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the Bank and to the Company; (c) maintain the privacy of customer and associate personal information; (d) maintain adequate record keeping; (e) engage in proper sales and trading practices; and (f) identify the legal, reputational, credit, liquidity and market risks inherent in our products could give rise to reputational risk that could cause harm to the Bank and our business prospects. If we fail to address any of these issues in an appropriate manner, we could be subject to additional legal risks, which, in turn, could increase the size and number of litigation claims and damages asserted or subject us to enforcement actions, fines and penalties and cause us to incur related costs and expenses. Our ability to attract and retain customers and employees could be adversely affected to the extent our reputation is damaged.

To the extent that we acquire other companies, our business may be negatively impacted by certain risks inherent with such acquisitions.

We have acquired and will continue to consider the acquisition of other financial services companies. To the extent that we acquire other companies in the future, our business may be negatively impacted by certain risks inherent with such acquisitions. These risks include the following:

the risk that the acquired business will not perform in accordance with management’s expectations;
the risk that difficulties will arise in connection with the integration of the operations of the acquired business with the operations of our businesses;
the risk that management will divert its attention from other aspects of our business;
the risk that we may lose key employees of the combined business; and
the risks associated with entering into geographic and product markets in which we have limited or no direct prior experience.

We may be required to write down goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets.

When the Company acquires a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition is allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired determines the amount of the purchase price that is allocated to goodwill acquired. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets were approximately $46.4 million. Under current accounting standards, if the Company

14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

determines goodwill or intangible assets are impaired, it would be required to write down the value of these assets. The Company conducts an annual review to determine whether goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets are impaired. The Company recently completed such an impairment analysis and concluded that no impairment charge was necessary for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company cannot provide assurance whether it will be required to take an impairment charge in the future. Any impairment charge would have a negative effect on its shareholders’ equity and financial results and may cause a decline in our stock price.

We are subject to operational risk.

We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, information technology system failures and errors, customer or employee fraud and catastrophic failures resulting from terrorist acts or natural disasters. We depend upon information technology, software, communication, and information exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks and over the Internet. Despite instituted safeguards, we cannot be certain that all of its systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack or other technological difficulties or failures. If information security is breached or other technology difficulties or failures occur, information may be lost or misappropriated, services and operations may be interrupted and we could be exposed to claims from customers. While we maintain a system of internal controls and procedures, any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

The market value of wealth management assets under administration may be negatively affected by changes in economic and market conditions.

A substantial portion of income from fiduciary services is dependent on the market value of wealth management assets under administration, which are primarily marketable securities. Changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions, volatility in financial markets, and general trends in business and finance, all of which are beyond our control, could adversely impact the market value of these assets and the fee revenues derived from the management of these assets.

We may not be able to attract and retain wealth management clients at current levels.

Due to strong competition, our wealth management division may not be able to attract and retain clients at current levels. Competition is strong as there are numerous well-established and successful investment management and wealth advisory firms including commercial banks and trust companies, investment advisory firms, mutual fund companies, stock brokerage firms, and other financial companies. Many of our competitors have greater resources than we have. Our ability to attract and retain wealth management clients is dependent upon our ability to compete with competitors’ investment products, level of investment performance, client services, marketing and distribution capabilities. If we are not successful, our results of operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

There are no unresolved written comments relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end of our fiscal year.

Item 2. Properties

The Company operates in 39 facilities, all of which are fully utilized and considered suitable and adequate for the purposes intended. The Company’s service center is located at 245 Commercial Street, Rockport, Maine, and is owned by the Company. The building has 32,360 square feet of space on two levels. The headquarters of the Company and the headquarters and main office of the Bank are located at 2 Elm Street, Camden, Maine. The building, which the Bank owns, has 15,500 square feet of space on three levels. The Bank also owns twenty-five of its branch facilities, none of which is subject to a mortgage. The Bank’s Rockland branch in the renovated “Spear Block” building is owned by the Bank and has the Bank branch facility on the first floor and suites for rent or sale on the upper floors. The Bangor, Maine building has 25,600 square feet of space on two levels. The Bank occupies 16,975 square feet of space on both floors, the Company utilizes 2,042 square feet for off-site computer processing, and Acadia Trust leases 1,110 square feet

15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

on the first floor and 535 square feet of space on the third floor. The remainder of the Bangor, Maine building and the former Rockland branch are leased to third-party tenants. The Ellsworth Main Street location, the main office for the former Union Bankshares Company, is owned by The Bank and has the Union Trust branch on the first floor, along with 2,365 square feet of space leased to Acadia Trust, while the second floor is leased to third-part tenants. The Bank also leases fourteen branches, a parcel of land, two parking lots and parking spaces associated with those branches under long-term leases, which expire in years ranging from 2010 through 2077. In 2007, Acadia Trust renewed its facility lease at 511 Congress Street, Portland, Maine, under a long-term lease, which expires in May 2012. Acadia Trust leases and occupies 11,715 square feet on the 9th floor.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business, which in our opinion, are not expected to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 4. [RESERVED]

16


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As of January 2, 2008, the Company stock listing was transferred to the NASDAQ Global Market (“NASDAQ”) under the ticker symbol ‘CAC.’ The Company has paid quarterly dividends since its inception in 1984 following a corporate reorganization in which the shareholders of the Bank exchanged shares of the Bank stock for shares in the Company. The high and low sales prices (as quoted by NASDAQ for 2009 and 2008) and cash dividends paid per share of the Company’s common stock, by calendar quarter for the past two years were as follows:

           
  2009   2008
     Market Price   Dividends Paid
per Share
  Market Price   Dividends Paid
per Share
     High   Low   High   Low
First Quarter   $ 31.52     $ 14.34     $ 0.25     $ 34.96     $ 27.82     $ 0.24  
Second Quarter   $ 35.93     $ 21.63     $ 0.25     $ 34.94     $ 23.05     $ 0.25  
Third Quarter   $ 35.40     $ 31.10     $ 0.25     $ 38.02     $ 22.47     $ 0.25  
Fourth Quarter   $ 35.91     $ 27.80     $ 0.25     $ 34.98     $ 21.13     $ 0.25  

As of December 31, 2009, there were 7,644,837 the Company’s common stock outstanding. As of March 1, 2010, there were 7,658,561 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding held of record by approximately 1,400 shareholders, as obtained through our transfer agent. Such number of record holders does not reflect the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee name through banks, brokerage firms and other nominees, which is estimated to be 3,500 shareholders based on the number of requested copies from such institutions.

Although the Company has historically paid quarterly dividends on its common stock, the Company’s ability to pay such dividends depends on a number of factors, including restrictions under federal laws and regulations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, and as a result, there can be no assurance that dividends will be paid in the future. For further information on dividend restrictions, refer to the Capital resources section of Item 7.

17


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following graph illustrates the annual percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return of the Company’s common stock for the period December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2009. For purposes of comparison, the graph illustrates comparable shareholder returns of the ABA NASDAQ Community Bank Index, the SNL $1B – $5B Bank Index, and the Russell 2000 Stock Index. The graph assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2004 in each and measures the amount by which the market value, assuming reinvestment of dividends, has changed as of December 31, 2009.

Stock Performance Graph

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

In June 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2008 Common Stock Repurchase Program. Under the program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of its outstanding common stock for a one-year period. Under the 2008 Plan, the Company repurchased 50,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $32.00 during the second half of 2008 and made no repurchases in the first half of 2009. The authority, which expired on July 1, 2009, was not renewed for the coming year.

18


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

         
  At or for the Year Ended December 31,
(In Thousands, Except per Share Data)   2009   2008(1)   2007   2006   2005
Financial Condition Data
                                            
Investments   $ 539,587     $ 670,040     $ 483,648     $ 461,708     $ 387,559  
Loans     1,526,758       1,500,908       1,145,639       1,218,129       1,182,175  
Allowance for loan losses     20,246       17,691       13,653       14,933       14,167  
Total assets     2,235,383       2,341,496       1,716,788       1,769,886       1,653,257  
Deposits     1,495,807       1,489,517       1,118,051       1,185,801       1,163,905  
Borrowings     526,138       661,805       460,133       437,364       347,039  
Shareholders’ equity     190,561       166,400       120,203       107,052       129,538  
Operating Data
                                            
Interest income   $ 113,331     $ 127,120     $ 107,736     $ 107,238     $ 89,721  
Interest expense     40,320       56,899       57,866       53,048       34,697  
Net interest income     73,011       70,221       49,870       54,190       55,024  
Provision for credit losses     8,213       4,397       100       2,208       1,265  
Net interest income after provision for credit losses     64,798       65,824       49,770       51,982       53,759  
Non-interest income before other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities     19,447       16,660       12,652       11,629       10,050  
Other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities           (14,950 )                   
Non-interest expense     51,029       46,816       33,686       34,224       32,461  
Income before income taxes     33,216       20,718       28,736       29,387       31,348  
Income taxes     10,443       5,383       8,453       9,111       9,968  
Net income   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283     $ 20,276     $ 21,380  
Ratios
                                            
Return on average assets     1.00 %      0.67 %      1.16 %      1.17 %      1.34 % 
Return on average equity     12.81 %      9.15 %      18.34 %      18.40 %      16.99 % 
Allowance for credit losses to total loans     1.33 %      1.18 %      1.19 %      1.23 %      1.20 % 
Non-performing loans to total loans     1.30 %      0.85 %      0.93 %      1.12 %      0.79 % 
Non-performing assets to total assets     1.13 %      0.71 %      0.64 %      0.78 %      0.57 % 
Average equity to average assets     7.80 %      7.28 %      6.33 %      6.36 %      7.90 % 
Efficiency ratio(2)     54.27 %      52.43 %      52.70 %      51.08 %      49.14 % 
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio     8.17 %      7.19 %      8.55 %      7.63 %      7.60 % 
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio     12.24 %      11.11 %      13.41 %      11.29 %      10.67 % 
Total risk-based capital ratio     13.49 %      12.32 %      14.64 %      12.73 %      11.92 % 
Per common share data
                                            
Basic earnings per share   $ 2.98     $ 2.00     $ 3.09     $ 2.93     $ 2.81  
Diluted earnings per share     2.97       2.00       3.09       2.93       2.80  
Dividends declared per share     1.00       1.00       1.20       0.66       0.82  
Dividends paid per share     1.00       0.99       0.96       0.88       1.30  
Book value per share     24.93       21.78       18.45       16.18       17.21  
Tangible book value per share(3)     18.86       15.62       17.79       15.40       16.40  
Dividend payout ratio     33.56 %      50.00 %      38.83 %      30.03 %      46.26 % 

(1) The 2008 data includes the merger of Union Bankshares Company with and into the Company as of January 3, 2008.
(2) Computed by dividing non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income (tax equivalent) and non-interest income (excluding security gains/losses).
(3) Computed by dividing shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangibles by the number of common shares outstanding.

19


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis, which follows, focuses on the factors affecting our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and financial condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and, where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Selected Consolidated Financial Data.

Executive Overview

Net income for 2009 of $22.8 million, or $2.97 per diluted share was 48.5% higher than the net income of $15.3 million, or $2.00 per diluted share reported for 2008. The following were significant factors related to the results of fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008:

Total loans at December 31, 2009 were $1.5 billion, an increase of $25.9 million compared to December 31, 2008. These balances do not include an additional $72.5 million of residential mortgages that were originated during 2009 and sold to Freddie Mac.
Deposits increased $6.3 million from a year ago, almost reaching the $1.5 billion level at December 31, 2009. Interest checking, savings and money market deposits increased by $43.0 million and demand deposits increased by $13.1 million. These increases were partially offset by declines in retail certificates of deposit of $47.2 million and brokered funds of $2.6 million.
Balance sheet deleveraging resulted in a decrease in investment securities of $130.5 million and a reduction in borrowings of $135.8 million in 2009 compared to 2008, which favorably impacted the capital ratios.
Shareholders’ equity increased 14.5% due to current year earnings and other comprehensive net gains less dividends declared.
Net interest income on a fully-taxable equivalent basis for 2009 increased 3.7% to $74.6 million due to lower funding costs which increased the net interest margin to 3.53% in 2009 compared to 3.37% in 2008.
The provision for credit losses of $8.2 million increased $3.8 million in 2009 compared to 2008 as a result of an increase in net loan charge-offs and higher non-performing asset levels. Net loan charge-offs totaled $5.6 million, or 0.37% of average loans, compared to $4.7 million, or 0.31%, for 2008. Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets amounted to 1.13% and 0.71% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Non-interest income before the impairment write-down on Freddie Mac securities was $19.4 million for 2009, a 16.7% increase over 2008. The increase was driven by an increase in mortgage banking income, including mortgage-servicing income and gains on the sale of loans, and security losses of $624,000 realized in 2008.
Non-interest expense for 2009 was $51.0 million, an increase of $4.2 million, or 9.0%, over the prior year, which was primarily due to an increase in FDIC insurance assessment rates as well as a special assessment of $1.1 million. There were also increases in foreclosed properties and collection costs, in part offset by a decrease in the amortization of the core deposit intangible. An estimated maximum exposure of $637,000 pertaining to misappropriated funds was also expensed.

20


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Critical Accounting Policies

In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, management is required to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from our current estimates, as a result of changing conditions and future events. Several estimates are particularly critical and are susceptible to significant near-term change, including the allowance for credit losses, accounting for acquisitions and review of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets for impairment, valuation of other real estate owned, other-than-temporary impairment of investments, accounting for postretirement plans and income taxes. Our significant accounting policies and critical estimates are summarized in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Credit Losses.  The allowance for credit losses consists of two components: 1) the allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) which is present as a contra to total gross loans in the asset section of the balance sheet, and 2) the reserve for unfunded commitments included in other liabilities on the balance sheet. In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, the ALL requires the most significant amount of management estimates and assumptions. The ALL, which is established through a charge to the provision for credit losses, is based on our evaluation of the level of the allowance required in relation to the estimated loss exposure in the loan portfolio. We regularly evaluate the ALL for adequacy by taking into consideration, among other factors, local industry trends, management’s ongoing review of individual loans, trends in levels of watched or criticized assets, an evaluation of results of examinations by regulatory authorities and other third parties, analyses of historical trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, the character and size of the loan portfolio, business and economic conditions and our estimation of probable losses.

In determining the appropriate level of ALL, we use a methodology to systematically measure the amount of estimated loan loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio. The methodology includes four elements: (1) identification of loss allocations for specific loans, (2) loss allocation factors for certain loan types based on credit grade and loss experience, (3) general loss allocations for other environmental factors, and (4) the unallocated portion of the allowance. The specific loan component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The methodology is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We use a risk rating system to determine the credit quality of our loans and apply the related loss allocation factors. In assessing the risk rating of a particular loan, we consider, among other factors, the obligor’s debt capacity, financial condition and flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources of repayment, the performance with respect to loan terms, the adequacy of collateral, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry in which the obligor operates. These factors are based on an evaluation of historical information, as well as subjective assessment and interpretation of current conditions. Emphasizing one factor over another, or considering additional factors that may be relevant in determining the risk rating of a particular loan but which are not currently an explicit part of our methodology, could impact the risk rating assigned to that loan. We periodically reassess and revise the loss allocation factors used in the assignment of loss exposure to appropriately reflect our analysis of loss experience. Portfolios of more homogenous populations of loans including residential mortgages and consumer loans are analyzed as groups taking into account delinquency rates and other economic conditions which may affect the ability of borrowers to meet debt service requirements, including interest rates and energy costs. We also consider the results of regulatory examinations, historical loss ranges, portfolio composition, and other changes in the portfolio. An additional allocation is determined based on a judgmental process whereby management considers qualitative and quantitative assessments of other environmental factors. For example, a significant portion of our loan portfolio is concentrated among borrowers in southern Maine and a substantial portion of the portfolio is collateralized by real estate in this area. Another portion of the commercial and commercial real estate loans are to borrowers in the hospitality, tourism and recreation industries. Finally, an unallocated portion of the total allowance is maintained to allow for shifts in portfolio composition and account for uncertainty in the economic environment.

21


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Since the methodology is based upon historical experience and trends as well as management’s judgment, factors may arise that result in different estimations. Significant factors that could give rise to changes in these estimates may include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions in our market area, concentration of risk, declines in local property values, and results of regulatory examinations. While management’s evaluation of the ALL as of December 31, 2009 determined the allowance to be appropriate, under adversely different conditions or assumptions, we may need to increase the allowance. The Corporate Risk Management group reviews the ALL with the Camden National Bank Board of Directors on a monthly basis. A more comprehensive review of the ALL is reviewed with the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as the Camden National Bank Board of Directors, on a quarterly basis.

The adequacy of the reserve for unfunded commitments is determined similarly to the allowance for loan losses, with the exception that management must also estimate the likelihood of these commitments being funded and becoming loans. This is done by evaluating the historical utilization of each type of unfunded commitment and estimating the likelihood that the historical utilization rates could change in the future.

Accounting for Acquisitions and Review of Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets for Impairment.  We are required to record assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair value, which is an estimate determined by the use of internal or other valuation techniques. These valuation estimates result in goodwill and other intangible assets and are subject to ongoing periodic impairment tests and are evaluated using various fair value techniques. Goodwill impairment evaluations are required to be performed annually and may be required more frequently if certain conditions indicating potential impairment exist. If we were to determine that our goodwill was impaired, the recognition of an impairment charge could have an adverse impact on our results of operations in the period that the impairment occurred or on our financial position. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment using several standard valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analyses, as well as an estimation of the impact of business conditions. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different estimates of carrying value.

Valuation of Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”).  Periodically, we acquire property in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of debt previously contracted. The valuation of this property is accounted for individually based on its fair value on the date of acquisition. At the acquisition date, if fair value of the property less the costs to sell is less than the book value of the loan, a charge or reduction in the ALL is recorded. If the value of the property becomes permanently impaired, as determined by an appraisal or an evaluation in accordance with our appraisal policy, we will record the decline by charging against current earnings. Upon acquisition of a property, we use a current appraisal or broker’s opinion to substantiate fair value for the property.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments.  We record an investment impairment charge at the point we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. In determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, we review information about the underlying investment that is publicly available, analysts’ reports, applicable industry data and other pertinent information, and assess our ability to hold the securities for the foreseeable future. The investment is written down to its current market value at the time the impairment is deemed to have occurred. Future adverse changes in market conditions, continued poor operating results of underlying investments or other factors could result in further losses that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, possibly requiring an additional impairment charge in the future.

Accounting for Postretirement Plans.  We use a December 31 measurement date to determine the expenses for our postretirement plans and related financial disclosure information. Postretirement plan expense is sensitive to changes in eligible employees (and their related demographics) and to changes in the discount rate and other expected rates, such as medical cost trends rates. As with the computations on plan expense, cash contribution requirements are also sensitive to such changes.

Income Taxes.  We account for income taxes by deferring income taxes based on estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax and book basis of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. We must also assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and establish a valuation allowance for those assets determined not

22


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

likely to be recoverable. Judgment is required in determining the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income. Although we have determined a valuation allowance is not required for all deferred tax assets, there is no guarantee that these assets will be realized. Although not currently under review, income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2008 are open to audit by federal and Maine authorities. If we, as a result of an audit, were assessed interest and penalties, the amounts would be recorded through other non-interest expense.

Results of Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported record net income of $22.8 million compared to $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Diluted earnings per share for each of these years were $2.97, $2.00, and $3.09, respectively. The major components of these results, which include net interest income, provision for credit losses, non-interest income, non-interest expense, and income taxes, are discussed below.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is our largest source of revenue and accounts for approximately 80% of total revenues. Net interest income reflects revenues generated through income from earning assets plus loan fees, less interest paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates, by loan and deposit pricing strategies and competitive conditions, the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the level of non-performing assets.

Net interest income was $74.6 million on a fully-taxable equivalent basis for 2009, compared to $72.0 million for 2008, an increase of $2.7 million or 3.7%. The increase in net interest income is largely due to an improvement of 16 basis points in the net interest margin, to 3.53%, for 2009. The increase in the net interest margin resulted from a decrease in the cost of funds, offset in part by a decrease in income on earning assets, both of which were caused by the decline in interest rates. Average interest-earning assets decreased by $24.1 million for 2009 compared to 2008, primarily due to decreases in investments and commercial loans. The yield on earning assets for 2009 decreased 59 basis points, reflecting a decline in the interest rate environment impacting both the investment and loan yields. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $31.3 million for 2009 compared to 2008, primarily due to declines in wholesale funding, in part offset by an increase in retail deposits driven by increases in certificate of deposit accounts. Total cost of funds decreased 83 basis points due to the decline in short-term interest rates. Future growth in net interest income will depend upon consumer and commercial loan demand, growth in deposits and the general level of interest rates.

Net interest income was $72.0 million on a fully-taxable equivalent basis in 2008, compared to $51.3 million in 2007, an increase of $20.7 million or 40.4%. The increase in net interest income was largely due to the acquisition of Union Bankshares Company and an improvement in the net interest margin of 28 basis points to 3.37% for 2008. Average interest-earning assets increased by $477.2 million, or 28.7%, in 2008, primarily due to loans and investment securities acquired with Union Trust. The yield on total loans decreased 78 basis points in 2008, reflecting a decline in the interest rate environment whereas the yield on taxable securities increased 7 basis points in 2008 as investment purchases were added to the portfolio at slightly higher yields than maturing investments. In 2008, average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $451.0 million, or 30.6%, while cost of funds decreased 97 basis points. The increase in average-interest bearing liabilities was primarily due to deposits and borrowings acquired with Union Trust combined with growth in certificates of deposit. As short-term interest rates declined, we were successful in reducing retail deposit interest rates resulting in a 108 basis point decline in total retail deposit cost of funds.

23


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, average balance sheets, interest income, interest expense, and the corresponding average yields earned and rates paid, as well as net interest income, net interest rate spread and net interest margin.

Average Balance, Interest and Yield/Rate Analysis

                 
                 
  December 31, 2009   December 31, 2008   December 31, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)   Average Balance   Interest   Yield/
Rate
  Average Balance   Interest   Yield/
Rate
  Average Balance   Interest   Yield/
Rate
ASSETS
                                                                                
Interest-earning assets:
                                                                                
Securities – taxable   $ 539,959     $ 25,979       4.81 %    $ 547,276     $ 27,671       5.06 %    $ 422,197     $ 21,086       4.99 % 
Securities – nontaxable(1)     63,472       3,707       5.84 %      70,177       4,138       5.90 %      42,050       2,537       6.03 % 
Trading account assets     1,479       24       1.62 %      1,515       35       2.31 %                  % 
Federal funds sold                 %      335       11       3.28 %      8,098       373       4.61 % 
Loans(1)(2):
                                                                                
Residential real estate     622,535       35,726       5.74 %      626,519       37,634       6.01 %      411,552       24,389       5.93 % 
Commercial real estate     415,369       25,168       6.06 %      413,744       28,828       6.97 %      360,683       28,493       7.90 % 
Commercial     181,392       10,170       5.61 %      206,220       14,181       6.88 %      188,245       15,365       8.16 % 
Municipal     21,533       1,079       5.01 %      22,752       1,131       4.97 %      26,989       1,678       6.22 % 
Consumer     267,375       13,106       4.90 %      248,628       15,256       6.14 %      200,158       15,208       7.60 % 
Total loans     1,508,204       85,249       5.65 %      1,517,863       97,030       6.39 %      1,187,627       85,133       7.17 % 
Total interest-earning assets     2,113,114       114,959       5.44 %      2,137,166       128,885       6.03 %      1,659,972       109,129       6.57 % 
Cash and due from banks     28,985                         37,351                         29,357                    
Other assets     155,921                         146,108                         73,000                    
Less: ALL     (18,742 )                  (17,303 )                  (14,393 )             
Total assets   $ 2,279,278                 $ 2,303,322                 $ 1,747,936              
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                                                                
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                                
NOW accounts   $ 206,424       967       0.47 %    $ 186,652       1,490       0.80 %    $ 106,920       429       0.40 % 
Savings accounts     140,246       499       0.36 %      133,128       766       0.58 %      89,705       336       0.37 % 
Money market accounts     312,746       3,127       1.00 %      345,834       7,542       2.18 %      311,171       13,450       4.32 % 
Certificates of deposit     578,231       15,997       2.77 %      531,539       19,008       3.58 %      389,565       17,121       4.39 % 
Total retail deposits     1,237,647       20,590       1.66 %      1,197,153       28,806       2.41 %      897,361       31,336       3.49 % 
Broker deposits     75,204       1,987       2.64 %      71,513       2,894       4.05 %      121,221       5,116       4.22 % 
Junior subordinated debentures     43,462       2,845       6.55 %      43,356       2,949       6.80 %      36,083       2,381       6.60 % 
Borrowings     536,908       14,898       2.77 %      612,532       22,250       3.63 %      418,894       19,033       4.54 % 
Total wholesale funding     655,574       19,730       3.01 %      727,401       28,093       3.86 %      576,198       26,530       4.60 % 
Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,893,221       40,320       2.13 %      1,924,554       56,899       2.96 %      1,473,559       57,866       3.93 % 
Demand deposits     184,979                         186,924                         148,751                    
Other liabilities     23,348                         24,275                         15,032                    
Shareholders’ equity     177,730                   167,569                   110,594              
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,279,278                 $ 2,303,322                 $ 1,747,936              
Net interest income (fully-taxable equivalent)              74,639                         71,986                         51,263        
Less: fully-taxable equivalent adjustment           (1,628 )                  (1,765 )                  (1,393 )       
           $ 73,011                 $ 70,221                 $ 49,870        
Net interest rate spread (fully-taxable equivalent)                 3.31 %                  3.07 %                  2.64 % 
Net interest margin (fully-taxable equivalent)                 3.53 %                  3.37 %                  3.09 % 

(1) Reported on tax-equivalent basis calculated using a rate of 35%.
(2) Non-accrual loans are included in total average loans.

24


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table presents certain information on a fully-taxable equivalent basis regarding changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes attributable to rate and volume.

           
  December 31, 2009 vs 2008
Increase (Decrease) Due to
  December 31, 2008 vs 2007
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(Dollars in Thousands)   Volume   Rate   Total   Volume   Rate   Total
Interest-earning assets:
                                                     
Securities – taxable   $ (370 )    $ (1,322 )    $ (1,692 )    $ 6,241     $ 344     $ 6,585  
Securities – nontaxable     (395 )      (36 )      (431 )      1,697       (96 )      1,601  
Trading account assets     (1 )      (10 )      (11 )      35             35  
Federal funds sold     (11 )            (11 )      (358 )      (4 )      (362 ) 
Residential real estate     (239 )      (1,669 )      (1,908 )      12,739       506       13,245  
Commercial real estate     113       (3,773 )      (3,660 )      4,192       (3,857 )      335  
Commercial     (1,707 )      (2,304 )      (4,011 )      1,467       (2,651 )      (1,184 ) 
Municipal     (61 )      9       (52 )      (263 )      (284 )      (547 ) 
Consumer     1,150       (3,300 )      (2,150 )      3,683       (3,635 )      48  
Total interest income     (1,521 )      (12,405 )      (13,926 )      29,433       (9,677 )      19,756  
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                     
NOW accounts     158       (681 )      (523 )      320       741       1,061  
Savings accounts     41       (308 )      (267 )      163       267       430  
Money market accounts     (722 )      (3,693 )      (4,415 )      1,498       (7,406 )      (5,908 ) 
Certificates of deposit     1,670       (4,681 )      (3,011 )      6,240       (4,353 )      1,887  
Broker deposits     149       (1,056 )      (907 )      (2,098 )      (124 )      (2,222 ) 
Junior subordinated debentures     7       (111 )      (104 )      480       88       568  
Borrowings     (2,747 )      (4,605 )      (7,352 )      8,798       (5,581 )      3,217  
Total interest expense     (1,444 )      (15,135 )      (16,579 )      15,401       (16,368 )      (967 ) 
Net interest income (fully-taxable equivalent)   $ (77 )    $ 2,730     $ 2,653     $ 14,032     $ 6,691     $ 20,723  

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The ALL is our best estimate of inherent risk of loss in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The ALL was $20.2 million, or 1.33% of total loans, at December 31, 2009, compared to $17.7 million, or 1.18% of total loans, at December 31, 2008. For the year 2009, our provision for credit losses charged to earnings amounted to $8.2 million, compared to $4.4 million for 2008. The increase in the provision was based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio, including, among others, growth in the loan portfolio, elevated levels of nonperforming assets, and increased loan losses. The ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans was 0.37% for 2009 compared to 0.31% for 2008 with 2009 charge-off activity centered in commercial and commercial real estate loans. See additional ALL discussion under the caption “Asset Quality.”

During 2008, we provided $4.4 million of expense to the provision for credit losses compared to $100,000 for 2007. The increase to the ALL for 2008 was primarily due to growth in the loan portfolio, our evaluation of credit quality, and general economic conditions. In 2008, the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 0.85% from 0.93% in 2007. However, net charge-offs were $3.3 million greater in 2008 compared to 2007. The ALL as a percentage of total loans was 1.18% at December 31, 2008, a slight decrease from 1.19% at December 31, 2007.

25


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Non-Interest Income

     
  Year Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Income from fiduciary services   $ 5,902     $ 6,453     $ 4,914  
Service charges on deposit accounts     5,261       5,375       3,447  
Other service charges and fees     2,908       2,720       1,833  
Bank-owned life insurance     1,476       1,287       832  
Brokerage and insurance commissions     1,356       1,371       826  
Mortgage banking income (loss), net     1,314       (361 )      127  
Net gains (losses) securities     52       (624 )       
Other income     1,178       439       673  
Total non-interest income before security impairment write-down     19,447       16,660       12,652  
Other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities           (14,950 )       
Total non-interest income   $ 19,447     $ 1,710     $ 12,652  

Non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 totaled $19.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The significant changes in 2009 compared to 2008 include:

In 2008, a write-down of $15.0 million of other-than-temporary-impaired securities resulting from investments in Auction Pass-Through Certificates sponsored by Merrill Lynch & Co, the assets of which consisted of Freddie Mac preferred stock. On September 6, 2008, the U.S. Treasury Department placed Freddie Mac in conservatorship and, as a result of this action, the payment of dividends ceased on all Freddie Mac issued stock, including the preferred stock supporting the Auction Pass-Through Certificates,
Decrease in income from fiduciary services of $551,000, or 8.5%, resulting from market value declines in assets under administration,
Increase in earnings on bank-owned life insurance of $189,000 primarily due to an increase in the amount of bank-owned policies resulting purchase of additional policies in the second half of 2008,
Increase in mortgage banking income of $1.7 million due to the sale of $72.5 million of residential mortgages in the secondary market.

Non-interest income decreased to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $12.7 million in 2007, which was a decline of $10.9 million. The decline was primarily the result of a $15.0 million write-down of other-than-temporarily-impaired securities resulting from investments in Auction Pass-Through Certificates, which consisted of Freddie Mac preferred stock, and other net security losses of $624,000. These securities losses were partially offset by increases in service charges on deposit accounts of $1.9 million, income from fiduciary services of $1.5 million, other service charges and fees of $887,000, and brokerage and insurance commissions of $545,000.

Non-Interest Expenses

     
  Year Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Salaries and employee benefits   $ 24,588     $ 24,093     $ 18,486  
Furniture, equipment and data processing     4,359       4,574       2,917  
Regulatory assessments     4,035       1,041       507  
Net occupancy     3,908       4,023       2,739  
Consulting and professional fees     2,955       3,166       2,327  
OREO and collection costs     2,332       1,079       333  
Amortization of core deposit intangible     502       822       856  
Other expenses     8,350       8,018       5,521  
Total non-interest expenses   $ 51,029     $ 46,816     $ 33,686  

26


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Total non-interest expense increased $4.2 million, or 9.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The significant changes in 2009 compared to 2008 include:

Increase in regulatory assessments of $3.0 million due to a $2.9 million increase in the FDIC insurance assessment rates which included a special assessment of $1.1 million levied in the second quarter of 2009 and the full utilization, in 2008, of assessment credits,
Increase in costs associated with foreclosure and collection costs and expenses on other real estate owned of $1.3 million which includes OREO write-downs of $1.0 million due to declining real estate values,
Write-off of an estimated maximum exposure of $637,000 pertaining to misappropriated funds and does not take into consideration recovery efforts,
Modest or declining expenses in most other non-interest expense categories due to cost control measures combined with a full year benefit related to the integration of Union Trust, and,
The efficiency ratio (non-interest expense divided by net interest income on a tax equivalent basis plus non-interest income excluding net investment securities gains/losses) was 54.27% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 52.43% for 2008.

Total non-interest expense increased $13.1 million, or 39.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Increases were recorded in all categories due to the Union Trust acquisition with the most significant increase in salary and employee benefits cost of $5.6 million, furniture, equipment and data processing expenses of $1.7 million, occupancy costs of $1.3 million, and other non-interest expense of $2.5 million (related to integration costs such as courier, debit card program, postage, and donations). In addition, we experienced an increase of $746,000 in foreclosure and collection costs and expenses on other real estate owned related to the increase in non-performing assets.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense totaled $10.4 million, $5.4 million and $8.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rate was approximately 31.4%, 26.0%, and 29.4% in each of the past three years, respectively. These effective rates differ from our marginal rate of about 35%, primarily due to our significant non-taxable interest income from state and political subdivisions obligations as well as a historic rehabilitation tax credit realized in 2007. A full detail of these amounts can be found in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike many industrial companies, substantially all of our assets and virtually all of our liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the general level of inflation. Over short periods of time, interest rates and the yield curve may not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as inflation.

Financial Condition

Overview

Total assets at December 31, 2009 were $2.2 billion, a decrease of $106.1 million, or 4.5%, from December 31, 2008. The change in assets consisted primarily of a $130.5 million decrease in investments partially offset by net growth in the loan portfolio of $25.9 million. Total liabilities decreased $130.3 million as borrowings decreased $135.8 million partially offset by an increase in total deposits (including brokered deposits) of $6.3 million. Total shareholders’ equity increased $24.2 million, which was a result of current year earnings and an increase in other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends to shareholders.

27


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cash and Due from Banks

Cash and due from banks decreased 15.4%, or $5.4 million, at December 31, 2009 compared to 2008, primarily due to a decrease in clearing funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and declines in compensating balances maintained at correspondent banks.

Investment Securities

Investments in securities of U.S. government sponsored enterprises, states and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and FRB stock, investment grade corporate bonds and equities are used to diversify our revenues, to provide interest rate and credit risk diversification and to provide for liquidity and funding needs. As a result of balance sheet deleveraging, total investment securities decreased $130.5 million, or 19.5%, to $539.6 million at December 31, 2009. We have investment securities in both the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity categories.

Unrealized gains or losses from investments categorized as “held to maturity” are only recorded when, and if, the security is sold or is considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Unrealized gains or losses on securities classified as “available for sale” are recorded as adjustments to shareholders’ equity, net of related deferred income taxes and are a component of other comprehensive income contained in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity. At December 31, 2009, we had $7.1 million of unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of the deferred taxes, compared to $89,000 of unrealized losses, net of deferred taxes, at December 31, 2008. The change from 2008 to 2009 is primarily attributed to a decline in market interest rates.

At December 31, 2009, $9.6 million of our private issue collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) have been downgraded to non-investment grade. The Company’s share of these downgraded CMOs is in the senior tranches. Management believes the unrealized loss for the CMOs is the result of current market illiquidity and the underestimation of value in the market. Stress tests are performed regularly on the higher risk bonds in the portfolio using current statistical data to determine expected cash flows and forecast potential losses. The results of the stress tests at December 31, 2009, reflect no current credit loss in the base case, but did reflect potential future losses. Based on this analysis the Company recorded a $11,000 OTTI write-down on two private issue CMOs.

At December 31, 2009, the Company held Duff & Phelps Select Income Fund Auction Preferred Stock with an amortized cost of $5.0 million which has failed at auction. The security is rated Triple-A by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. Management believes the failed auctions are a temporary liquidity event related to this asset class of securities. The Company is currently collecting all amounts due according to contractual terms and has the ability and intent to hold the securities until they clear auction, are called, or mature; therefore, the securities are not considered other than temporarily impaired.

28


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth the carrying amount of our investment securities as of the dates indicated:

           
  December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)   2009   2008   2007
Securities available for sale:
                                                     
Obligations of US government sponsored enterprises   $       %    $ 4,603       0.8 %    $ 11,993       2.8 % 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions     18,060       3.8 %      25,347       4.2 %      7,250       1.7 % 
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by US government sponsored enterprises     428,356       89.3 %      525,336       86.7 %      317,332       75.0 % 
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations     28,872       6.0 %      46,777       7.7 %      64,763       15.3 % 
Total debt securities     475,288       99.1 %      602,063       94.4 %      401,338       94.8 % 
Equity securities     4,420       0.9 %      3,968       0.6 %      21,770       5.2 % 
Total securities available for sale     479,708       100.0 %      606,031       100.0 %      423,108       100.0 % 
Securities held to maturity:
                                                     
Obligations of states and political subdivisions     37,914       100.0 %      42,040       100.0 %      40,726       100.0 % 
Total securities held to maturity     37,914       100.0 %      42,040       100.0 %      40,726       100.0 % 
     $ 517,622           $ 648,071           $ 463,834        

The following table sets forth the contractual maturities and fully-taxable equivalent weighted average yields of our investment securities at December 31, 2009.

       
  Available for Sale   Held to Maturity
(Dollars in Thousands)   Book
Value
  Yield to
Maturity
  Amortized
Cost
  Yield to
Maturity
State and political subdivisions:
                                   
Due in 1 year or less   $ 795       3.95 %    $ 167       3.12 % 
Due in 1 to 5 years     4,935       3.68 %      3,456       3.78 % 
Due in 5 to 10 years     10,807       3.86 %      29,773       3.94 % 
Due after 10 years     1,523       3.93 %      4,518       4.02 % 
       18,060       3.82 %      37,914       3.92 % 
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored enterprises:
                                   
Due in 1 year or less     4,183       3.61 %             
Due in 1 to 5 years     26,383       4.75 %             
Due in 5 to 10 years     47,213       4.53 %             
Due after 10 years     350,577       4.61 %             
       428,356       4.60 %             
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations:
                          
Due after 10 years     28,872       4.60 %             
       28,872       4.60 %             
Equity securities:
                                   
Due after 10 years     4,420       0.24 %             
       4,420       0.24 %             
Total securities   $ 479,708       4.53 %    $ 37,914       3.92 % 

29


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

We are required to maintain a level of investment in FHLB Boston (“FHLBB”) stock based on the level of our FHLB advances. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, our investment in FHLB stock totaled $21.0 million. No market exists for shares of the FHLB. FHLB stock may be redeemed at par value five years following termination of FHLB membership, subject to limitations which may be imposed by the FHLB or its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board, to maintain capital adequacy of the FHLB. While we currently have no intention to terminate our FHLB membership, the ability to redeem our investment in FHLB stock would be subject to the conditions imposed by the FHLB.

In early 2009, the FHLB advised its members that it is focusing on preserving capital in response to ongoing market volatility. Accordingly, payments of quarterly dividends for 2009 were suspended and payment of quarterly dividends in 2010 is unlikely. During 2008, we received $1.0 million in dividends from the FHLB. Further, the FHLB has placed a moratorium on excess stock repurchases from its members. We will continue to monitor our investment in FHLB stock.

Loans

The Bank provides loans primarily to customers located within its geographic market area. At December 31, 2009, loans of $1.5 billion increased $25.9 million from December 31, 2008 due to increases in commercial real estate loans, consumer loans, and residential real estate loans of $34.5 million, $7.2 million, and $6.6 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decline in the commercial portfolio of $22.5 million as a result of normal pay-downs and decreased demand.

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

                   
December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
Residential real estate   $ 627,655       41 %    $ 621,048       41 %    $ 410,687       36 %    $ 412,812       34 %    $ 375,399       32 % 
Commercial real estate     434,783       28 %      400,312       27 %      333,506       29 %      392,381       32 %      429,490       36 % 
Commercial     191,214       13 %      213,683       14 %      197,736       17 %      213,450       18 %      187,752       16 % 
Consumer     273,106       18 %      265,865       18 %      203,710       18 %      199,486       16 %      189,534       16 % 
     $ 1,526,758       100 %    $ 1,500,908       100 %    $ 1,145,639       100 %    $ 1,218,129       100 %    $ 1,182,175       100 % 

Residential real estate loans consist of loans secured by one-to-four family residences. We generally retain adjustable-rate mortgages in the portfolio and, based on market risk assessments, frequently will retain fixed-rate mortgages. Residential real estate loan balances increased $6.6 million, or 1.1% at December 31, 2009 compared to a year ago. Mortgage refinancing activity was elevated during 2009 compared to prior years due to low mortgage rates. We originated and sold $72.5 million in residential fixed-rate real estate production on the secondary market to Freddie Mac. Due to historically low mortgage rates in 2009, a decision was made to sell current production falling under specified rates, as determined by our Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”). In 2008, residential real estate mortgage loans increased $210.4 million, or 51.2%, as a result of the assumption of $221.0 million from the Union Trust acquisition, in part offset by normal pay downs and declines in demand. The decline in demand was caused by continued volatility in the real estate market resulting from the tightening of credit markets and general declines in real estate values, which negatively impacted consumer demand for mortgage loans.

Commercial real estate loans consist of loans secured by income and non-income producing commercial real estate. We focus on lending to financially sound business customers within our geographic marketplace, as well as offering loans for the acquisition, development and construction of commercial real estate. In 2009, commercial real estate loans increased $34.5 million, or 8.6%, as a result of solid credit opportunities resulting from the pull-back of many financial institutions. In 2008, commercial real estate loans increased $66.8 million, or 20.0%, as a result of the assumption of $86.5 million from the Union Trust acquisition, partially offset by pay-offs and normal pay-downs of the commercial real estate portfolio, combined with softening demand due to economic factors and increased competition related to the rate and structure of loan agreements. In addition, we charged-off $3.2 million of commercial real estate loans and moved approximately $3.6 million to other real estate owned.

30


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Commercial loans consist of loans secured by various corporate assets, as well as loans to provide working capital in the form of lines of credit, which may be secured or unsecured. Municipal loans primarily consist of short-term tax anticipation notes made to municipalities for fixed asset or construction related purposes and are included in commercial loans. We focus on lending to financially sound business customers and municipalities within our geographic marketplace. In 2009, commercial loans decreased $22.5 million, or 10.5%, as a result of pay-downs and decreased demand. In 2008, commercial loans increased$15.9 million, or 8.1%, as a result of the Union Trust acquisition, partially offset by softening demand, continued pay-offs and normal pay-downs of the commercial portfolio.

Consumer loans are originated for a wide variety of purposes designed to meet the needs of customers. Consumer loans include overdraft protection, automobile, boat, recreation vehicle, and mobile home loans, home equity loans and lines, and secured and unsecured personal loans. In 2009, consumer loans increased by $7.2 million, or 2.7%, primarily as a result of utilization of low rate home equity loans and lines for home improvement, to consolidate debt and for general consumer purposes. In 2008, consumer loans increased by $62.2 million, or 30.5%, as a result of the assumption of $25.4 million from the Union Trust acquisition, and the demand for low rate home equity loans.

Asset Quality

The Board of Directors monitors credit risk management through the Directors’ Loan Committee and Corporate Risk Management. The Directors’ Loan Committee reviews large exposure credit requests, monitors asset quality on a regular basis and has approval authority for credit granting policies. Corporate Risk Management oversees management’s systems and procedures to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio, conduct a loan review program, maintain the integrity of the loan rating system and determine the adequacy of the ALL. Our practice is to identify problem credits early and take charge-offs as promptly as practicable. In addition, management continuously reassesses its underwriting standards in response to credit risk posed by changes in economic conditions.

Non-Performing Assets.  Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past due, renegotiated loans and property acquired through foreclosure or repossession.

The following table sets forth the amount of our non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:

         
  December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
Non-accrual loans   $ 17,940     $ 12,501     $ 10,625     $ 13,124     $ 8,938  
Accruing loans past due 90 days     1,135       206       6       555       447  
Renegotiated loans not included above     581                          
Total non-performing loans     19,656       12,707       10,631       13,679       9,385  
Other real estate owned     5,479       4,024       400       125        
Total non-performing assets   $ 25,135     $ 16,731     $ 11,031     $ 13,804     $ 9,385  
Non-performing loans to total loans     1.29 %      0.85 %      0.93 %      1.12 %      0.79 % 
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans     103.26 %      139.22 %      128.43 %      109.17 %      150.95 % 
Non-performing assets to total assets     1.13 %      0.71 %      0.64 %      0.78 %      0.57 % 
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing assets     80.75 %      105.73 %      123.77 %      108.18 %      150.95 % 

The OREO balance at December 31, 2009 consisted of ten properties, including two residential properties, seven commercial/mixed use properties, and one parcel of raw land. During 2009, the Company recorded an OREO valuation allowance primarily related to two properties that were included in OREO at December 31, 2008. The first property is a parcel of raw land that the Company relied upon the appraised value and an offer to purchase the land at the time of acquisition. The sale of the property did not occur and due to the continued deterioration in the real estate market, the value of the property was reassessed during the first quarter of 2009, which resulted in a $666,000 increase in the valuation allowance. The second property is a commercial property that was reassessed during the third quarter of 2009 and a new appraisal

31


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

resulted in a $340,000 increase in the valuation allowance. The OREO balance is higher than we have historically experienced, and in light of the current economic environment and limited bid activity at the point of auction, we anticipate the level of OREO to continue to be at a higher than normal level.

Non-performing loans increased $6.9 million since December 31, 2008 due to the deterioration in economic conditions, resulting from a continued decrease in retail sales in our market area, rising unemployment, and an overall decline in real estate values. The portfolio of loans listed as non-performing are diversified by region, collateral, and loan size. Our largest single exposure is secured by a commercial property in the southern region of the state. Until the economy improves, we expect that non-performing loans will remain at elevated levels.

Non-Accrual Loans.  A loan is classified as non-accrual generally when it becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal payments. All previously accrued but unpaid interest on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income in the current period. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans (including impaired loans) are applied as a reduction of principal. A loan remains on non-accrual status until all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2009 were $17.9 million, or 1.18% of total loans, compared to $12.5 million, or 0.83% of total loans, at December 31, 2008. The following table sets forth information concerning non-accrual loans at the date indicated.

   
(Dollars in Thousands)   December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008
Non-accrual Loans:
                 
Residential real estate loans   $ 6,161     $ 4,048  
Commercial real estate     6,476       4,957  
Commercial loans     4,145       2,384  
Consumer loans     1,158       1,112  
Total Non-accrual Loans   $ 17,940     $ 12,501  

Interest income that would have been recognized if loans on non-accrual status had been current in accordance with their original terms was approximately $961,000, $838,000 and $535,000 in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Interest income attributable to these loans included in the Consolidated Statements of Income amounted to approximately $431,000, $498,000 and $456,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Potential Problem Loans.  Potential problem loans consist of classified accruing commercial and commercial real estate loans that were between 30 and 89 days past due. Such loans are characterized by weaknesses in the financial condition of borrowers or collateral deficiencies. Based on historical experience, the credit quality of some of these loans may improve due to changes in collateral values or the financial condition of the borrowers, while the credit quality of other loans may deteriorate, resulting in some amount of loss. These loans are not included in the analysis of non-accrual loans above. At December 31, 2009, potential problem loans amounted to approximately $1.7 million, or 0.11% of total loans, compared to $4.1 million, or 0.27% of total loans at December 31, 2008. The reduction was attributed in part to the migration of a portion of potential problem loans at December 31, 2008 to non-accrual status during 2009.

Past Due Loans.  Past due loans consist of accruing loans that were between 30 and 89 days past due, include the potential problem loans noted above. The following table sets forth information concerning the past due loans at the date indicated.

   
(Dollars in Thousands)   December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008
Loans 30 – 89 days past due:
                 
Residential real estate loans   $ 1,847     $ 2,880  
Commercial real estate     2,196       2,314  
Commercial loans     639       3,601  
Consumer loans     563       829  
Total loans 30 – 89 days past due   $ 5,245     $ 9,624  
Loans 30 – 89 days past due to total loans     0.34 %      0.64 % 

32


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Allowance for Loan Losses.  We use a methodology to systematically measure the amount of estimated loan loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio for purposes of establishing a sufficient allowance for loan losses. During 2009, there were no significant changes to the allowance assessment methodology. The allowance is management’s best estimate of the probable loan losses as of the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to earnings and by recoveries of amounts previously charged off, and is reduced by charge-offs on loans.

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments.  The reserve for unfunded commitments is based on management’s estimate of the amount required to reflect the probable inherent losses on outstanding letters and unused loan credit lines. Adequacy of the reserve is determined using a consistent, systematic methodology, similar to the one, which analyzes the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, management must also estimate the likelihood that these commitments would be funded and become loans. This is done by evaluating the historical utilization of each type of unfunded commitment and estimating the likelihood that the current utilization rates on lines available at the balance sheet date could increase in the future.

The following table sets forth information concerning the activity in our allowance for credit losses during the periods indicated.

         
  Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
Allowance for loan losses at the beginning of period   $ 17,691     $ 13,653     $ 14,933     $ 14,167     $ 13,641  
Acquired from Union Trust           4,369                    
Provision for loan losses     8,162       4,397       100       2,208       1,265  
Charge-offs:
                                            
Residential real estate loans     792       221       50             55  
Commercial real estate     1,844       3,236       416       1,030       30  
Commercial loans     2,640       1,286       1,411       569       885  
Consumer loans     1,180       810       315       234       254  
Total loan charge-offs     6,456       5,553       2,192       1,833       1,224  
Recoveries:
                                            
Residential real estate loans     10       12             13       25  
Commercial real estate loans     127       78       215             5  
Commercial loans     306       422       425       202       306  
Consumer loans     406       313       172       176       149  
Total loan recoveries     849       825       812       391       485  
Net charge-offs     5,607       4,728       1,380       1,442       739  
Allowance for loan losses at the end of the period   $ 20,246     $ 17,691     $ 13,653     $ 14,933     $ 14,167  
Components of allowance for credit losses:
                                            
Allowance for loan losses   $ 20,246     $ 17,691     $ 13,653     $ 14,933     $ 14,167  
Liability for unfunded credit commitments     51                          
Balance of allowance for credit losses at end of the period   $ 20,297     $ 17,691     $ 13,653     $ 14,933     $ 14,167  
Average loans outstanding   $ 1,508,204     $ 1,517,863     $ 1,187,627     $ 1,225,933     $ 1,129,004  
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding     0.37 %      0.31 %      0.12 %      0.12 %      0.07 % 
Provision for credit losses to average loans outstanding     0.54 %      0.29 %      0.01 %      0.18 %      0.11 % 
Allowance for loan losses to total loans     1.33 %      1.18 %      1.19 %      1.23 %      1.20 % 
Allowance for credit losses to net charge-offs     361.99 %      374.18 %      989.35 %      1035.58 %      1917.05 % 
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans     103.00 %      39.22 %      128.43 %      109.17 %      150.95 % 
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing assets     80.55 %      105.73 %      123.77 %      108.18 %      150.95 % 

33


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2009, the Company provided $8.2 million of expense to the ALL compared to $4.4 million for 2008. The determination of an appropriate level of ALL, and resulting provision for loan losses, which affects earnings, is based on our analysis of various economic factors and review of the loan portfolio, which may change due to numerous factors including loan growth, payoffs of lower quality loans, recoveries on previously charged-off loans, improvement in the financial condition of the borrowers, risk rating downgrades/upgrades and charge-offs. We utilize a comprehensive approach toward determining the ALL, which includes an expanded risk rating system to assist us in identifying the risks being undertaken, as well as migration within the overall loan portfolio. The increase in the provision for loan losses was primarily a result of an increase in net charge-offs mainly associated with commercial real estate and commercial loans. Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets amounted to 1.13% at December 31, 2009, compared to 0.71% at December 31, 2008, resulting from an increase in non-accrual loans. Our local economy has continued to experience a decline in retail sales, rising unemployment, and an overall decline in real estate values. We believe the ALL of $20.2 million, or 1.33% of total loans outstanding and 103.0% of total non-performing loans at December 31, 2009, was appropriate given the current economic conditions in our service area and the condition of the loan portfolio, although if conditions continue to deteriorate, more provision may be needed. The ALL was 1.18% of total loans outstanding and 139.2% of total non-performing loans at December 31, 2008.

We remain vigilant in the monitoring of asset quality and continue to be proactive in resolving credit issues and managing through the economic cycle. We believe the economy is still in a credit cycle correction and could be negatively affected by national, regional and local economic impacts. We continue to have concerns regarding various industries, including fishing, hospitality, and commercial real estate development, and do not yet know how the economy will bear out. An additional future risk factor is a potential change in federal and state regulations which may impact a bank’s ability to take appropriate action to protect its financial interests in certain loan situations.

For further discussion of the ALL, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section, Item 1A. Risk Factors and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of the ALL by loan categories at the dates indicated.

                   
   As of December 31,
     2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
(Dollars in Thousands)   Amount   Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
  Amount   Percent of Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
  Amount   Percent of Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
  Amount   Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
  Amount   Percent of
Loans in
Each
Category
to Total
Loans
Balance at end of year applicable to:
                                                                                         
Commercial and commercial real estate loans   $ 11,576       41 %    $ 10,136       41 %    $ 9,249       46 %    $ 10,691       50 %    $ 10,148       52 % 
Residential real estate loans     2,714       41 %      2,985       41 %      1,461       36 %      1,370       34 %      1,172       32 % 
Consumer loans     2,335       18 %      2,294       18 %      1,169       18 %      1,097       16 %      1,011       16 % 
Unallocated     3,621       N/A       2,276       N/A       1,774       N/A       1,775       N/A       1,836       N/A  
     $ 20,246       100 %    $ 17,691       100 %    $ 13,653       100 %    $ 14,933       100 %    $ 14,167       100 % 

Prior to the Company’s recognition in 2009 of a separate reserve for unfunded commitments, a portion of the other category was reserved for inherent losses in the off-balance sheet exposures, which are not recognized in the separate liability.

34


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment in Bank-Owned Life Insurance

Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) amounted to $41.7 million and $40.5 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, with the increase due to normal increases in the cash surrender value less the proceeds for the surrender of two policies of $258,000. BOLI provides a means to mitigate increasing employee benefit costs. We expect to benefit from the BOLI contracts as a result of the tax-free growth in cash surrender value and death benefits that are expected to be generated over time. The largest risk to the BOLI program is credit risk of the insurance carriers. To mitigate this risk, annual financial condition reviews are completed on all carriers. BOLI is invested in the “general account” of quality insurance companies or in separate account product. All such general account carriers were rated “A” or better by two of the three major rating agencies at December 31, 2009. BOLI is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at its cash surrender value. Increases in BOLI’s cash surrender value are reported as a component of non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deposits

The Bank receives checking accounts, savings and time deposits primarily from customers located within its geographic market area, from the brokered deposit market, and the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry System (“CDARS”). Total deposits of $1.5 billion at December 31, 2009 increased $6.3 million over 2008. Core deposit growth was strong with increases in demand deposit balances of $13.1 million and increases in interest checking, savings and money markets of $43.0 million. Growth in total deposits was partially offset by a decline in retail certificate of deposits of $47.2 million and brokered funds of $2.6 million. At December 31, 2009, the Bank had $42.2 million with CDARS, compared to $53.4 million at December 31, 2008.

In 2008, total deposits increased $371.5 million over 2007, primarily reflecting the assumption of $331.5 million of deposits from the Union Trust acquisition. In addition to the amounts assumed from Union Trust, retail certificates of deposit increased $100.5 million as consumers sought security and responded positively to several CD rate specials promoted during the year, while checking accounts (demand deposit and NOW accounts) declined $21.9 million and money market accounts declined $40.4 million as consumers moved money to higher yielding accounts. At December 31, 2008, the Bank had $83.4 million of brokered deposit balances, of which $51.7 million were brokered certificates of deposit and $31.7 million were brokered money market accounts.

Borrowings

In 2009, borrowings decreased $135.8 million in conjunction with the decline in total assets, and were primarily due to a reduction in other borrowed funds which resulted from a decrease in overnight funds with the FHLB of $131.7 million. In 2008, borrowings increased $201.7 million primarily due to an increase in other borrowed funds which resulted from an increase in overnight funds with the FHLB and the increased use of commercial repurchase agreements as an alternate funding source. Through the Union Trust acquisition, we assumed $165.3 million of borrowings, the majority of which was comprised of $99.4 million of short-term borrowings and $58.6 million of term advances with the FHLB.

The borrowings we utilized have primarily been advances from the FHLB. In addition, we use Federal Funds, treasury, tax and loan deposits and repurchase agreements secured by United States government or agency securities. Approximately 27.7% of all borrowings mature or reprice within the next three months. The following table presents certain information regarding short-term borrowings included in other borrowed funds for the years ended:

     
  As of December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)   2009   2008   2007
Balance outstanding at end of year   $ 145,541     $ 232,705     $ 73,333  
Average balance outstanding     190,142       154,583       118,811  
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the year     277,562       232,705       201,669  
Weighted average interest rate during the year     1.92 %      2.37 %      4.05 % 
Weighted average interest rate at end of year     1.06 %      0.74 %      3.36 % 

35


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Shareholders’ Equity

Total shareholders’ equity increased $24.2 million, or 14.5%, which was a result of current year earnings of $22.8 million and an increase in other comprehensive income of $8.0 million offset by dividends declared to shareholders of $7.6 million.

The following table presents certain information regarding shareholders’ equity for the years ended:

     
  As of December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Return on average equity     12.81 %      9.15 %      18.34 % 
Average equity to average assets     7.80 %      7.28 %      6.33 % 
Dividend payout ratio     33.56 %      50.00 %      38.83 % 
Dividends declared per share   $ 1.00     $ 1.00     $ 1.20  
Book value per share     24.93       21.78       18.45  

Liquidity

Liquidity needs require the availability of cash to meet the withdrawal demands of depositors and credit commitments to borrowers. Liquidity is defined as our ability to maintain availability of funds to meet customer needs, as well as to support our asset base. The primary objective of liquidity management is to maintain a balance between sources and uses of funds to meet our cash flow needs in the most economical and expedient manner. Due to the potential for unexpected fluctuations in both deposits and loans, active management of liquidity is necessary. We maintain various sources of funding and levels of liquid assets in excess of regulatory guidelines in order to satisfy their varied liquidity demands. We monitor liquidity in accordance with internal guidelines and all applicable regulatory requirements. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, our level of liquidity exceeded target levels. We believe that we currently have appropriate liquidity available to respond to liquidity demands. Sources of funds that we utilized consist of deposits, borrowings from the FHLBB and other sources, cash flows from operations, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans, investments and mortgage-backed securities and the sales of mortgage loans.

Deposits continue to represent our primary source of funds. For 2009, average deposits (including brokered deposits) of $1.5 billion increased $42.2 million, or 2.9%, compared to 2008. Comparing average deposits for 2009 to 2008, declines were experienced in average money market account balances of $33.1 million and demand deposits of $1.9 million, while average interest checking, savings, and retail certificates of deposit increased $19.8 million, $7.1 million and $46.7 million, respectively. Average brokered deposits increased $3.7 million. Included in the money market deposit category are deposits from Acadia Trust, representing client funds. The balance in the Acadia Trust client money market account, which was $86.2 million at December 31, 2009, could increase or decrease depending upon changes in the portfolios of the clients of Acadia Trust. The shift from money market accounts to retail certificates of deposit was the result of changes in market rates, while the decline in checking accounts reflects an increase in seasonal outflows due to the current economic environment.

The maturity dates of certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of deposit, in denominations of $100,000 or more are set forth in the following table. These deposits are generally considered to be more rate sensitive than other deposits and, therefore, more likely to be withdrawn to obtain higher yields elsewhere if available.

 
(Dollars in Thousands)   December 31,
2009
Time remaining until maturity:
        
Less than 3 months   $ 33,655  
3 months through 6 months     33,955  
6 months through 12 months     78,177  
Over 12 months     71,921  
     $ 217,708  

36


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Borrowings are used to supplement deposits as a source of liquidity. In addition to borrowings from the FHLBB, we purchase federal funds, sell securities under agreements to repurchase and utilize treasury tax and loan accounts. Average borrowings and long-term debt for 2009 decreased by $75.5 million to $580.4 million. We secure borrowings from the FHLBB, whose advances remain the largest non-deposit-related funding source, with qualified residential real estate loans, certain investment securities and certain other assets available to be pledged. The carrying value of loans pledged as collateral at the FHLBB was $709.5 million and $650.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral at the FHLBB was $28.3 million and $135.8 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Through our bank subsidiary, we have an available line of credit with the FHLBB of $9.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008. We had an outstanding balance on the line of credit with the FHLBB at December 31, 2009 of $3.5 million which was paid off on January 4, 2010. We had no outstanding balance at December 31, 2008. Long-term borrowings represent securities sold under repurchase agreements with major brokerage firms and a note payable with a maturity date over one year. Both wholesale and retail repurchase agreements are secured by mortgage-backed securities and government sponsored enterprises. The Company has $10.0 million in lines of credit with a maturity date of December 23, 2010.

We believe the investment portfolio and residential loan portfolio provide a significant amount of contingent liquidity that could be accessed in a reasonable time period through sales of those portfolios. We also believe that we have additional untapped access to the brokered deposit market, commercial reverse repurchase transaction market and the FRB discount window. These sources are considered as liquidity alternatives in our contingent liquidity plan. We believe that the level of liquidity is sufficient to meet current and future funding requirements. However, changes in economic conditions, including consumer saving habits and availability or access to the national brokered deposit and commercial repurchase markets, could significantly impact our liquidity position.

Loan demand also affects our liquidity position. However, of the loans maturing over one year, approximately 54.2% are variable rate loans. The following table presents the maturities of loans at December 31, 2009:

       
(Dollars in Thousands)   <1 Year   1 Through
5 Years
  More than
5 Years
  Total
Maturity Distribution:
                                   
Fixed Rate:
                                   
Residential real estate   $ 3,831     $ 27,438     $ 408,495     $ 439,764  
Commercial real estate     1,835       35,648       28,879       66,362  
Commercial     13,588       34,815       4,845       53,248  
Consumer     2,011       14,401       93,552       109,964  
Municipal     430       8,374       4,765       13,569  
Total Fixed Rate     21,695       120,676       540,536       682,907  
Variable Rate:
                                   
Residential real estate     5,170       798       181,923       187,891  
Commercial real estate     6,128       46,264       316,029       368,421  
Commercial     48,345       17,987       58,065       124,397  
Consumer     1,816       1,123       160,203       163,142  
Total Variable Rate     61,459       66,172       716,220       843,851  
     $ 83,154     $ 186,848     $ 1,256,756     $ 1,526,758  

Capital Resources

Under FRB guidelines, we are required to maintain capital based on risk-adjusted assets. These capital requirements represent quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by our regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). These guidelines apply to us on a consolidated basis. Under the current

37


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

guidelines, banking organizations must maintain a risk-based capital ratio of 8.0%, of which at least 4.0% must be in the form of core capital (as defined). Our risk-based ratios, and those of our bank subsidiary, exceeded regulatory guidelines at December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company’s Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets was 12.24% and 11.11% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively and total capital to risk weighted assets was 13.49% and 12.32% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition to risk-based capital requirements, the FRB requires bank holding companies to maintain a minimum leverage capital ratio of core capital to total assets of 4.0%. Total assets for this purpose do not include goodwill and any other intangible assets and investments that the FRB determines should be deducted. Our leverage ratio was 8.17% and 7.19% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Although the junior subordinated debentures are recorded as a liability on our Statement of Condition, we are permitted, in accordance with regulatory guidelines, to include, subject to certain limits, the trust preferred securities in our calculation of risk-based capital. At December 31, 2009, $43.0 million of the trust preferred securities was included in Tier 1 and total risk-based capital.

As part of our goal to operate a safe, sound and profitable financial organization, we are committed to maintaining a strong capital base. Shareholders’ equity totaled $190.6 million and $166.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which amounted to 8.5% of total assets at December 31, 2009 and 7.1% of total assets at December 31, 2008. Total shareholders’ equity increased $24.2 million, or 14.5%, which was a result of current year earnings and increases in other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends declared to shareholders.

Our principal cash requirement is the payment of dividends on our common stock, as and when declared by the Board of Directors. We paid dividends to shareholders in the aggregate amount of $7.7 million, $7.3 million and $6.3 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our Board of Directors approves cash dividends on a quarterly basis after careful analysis and consideration of various factors, including the following: a) capital position relative to total assets, b) risk-based assets, c) total classified assets, d) economic conditions, e) growth rates for total assets and total liabilities, f) earnings performance and projections and g) strategic initiatives and related capital requirements. All dividends declared and distributed by the Company will be in compliance with applicable state corporate law and regulatory requirements.

We are primarily dependent upon the payment of cash dividends by our subsidiaries to service our commitments. We, as the sole shareholder of our subsidiaries, are entitled to dividends, when and as declared by each subsidiary’s Board of Directors from legally available funds. The Bank declared dividends in the aggregate amount of $12.0 million for 2009 and 2008. Under regulations prescribed by the OCC, without prior OCC approval our bank subsidiary may not declare dividends in any year in excess of the each bank’s (i) net income for the current year, (ii) plus its retained net income for the prior two years. If we are required to use dividends from the Bank to service unforeseen commitments in the future we may be required to reduce the dividends paid to our shareholders going forward.

In June 2008, the Board of Directors voted to authorize us to purchase up to 750,000 shares of outstanding common stock for a period of one year that expired on July 1, 2009, and was not renewed for the coming year. We repurchased 50,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $32.00 under the plan, all of which were purchased during 2008.

On April 29, 2003, our shareholders approved the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The maximum number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under this Plan is 800,000 shares. Awards may be granted in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock, unrestricted stock, performance share and dividend equivalent rights, or any combination of the preceding, and the exercise price shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of incentive stock options, or 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of non-qualified stock options. No stock options are exercisable more than ten years after the date the stock option is granted. Prior to April 29, 2003, we had three stock option plans. Under all three plans, the options were immediately vested when granted, and expire ten years from the date the option was granted. The exercise price of all options equaled the market price of our stock on the date of grant. For further information on equity compensation plans and related accounting treatment, refer to Note 1 and Note 15 within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Item 8.

38


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the normal course of business, we are a party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, which are not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. These financial instruments include lending commitments and letters of credit. Those instruments involve varying degrees of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. We follow the same credit policies in making commitments to extend credit and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments, including requiring similar collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the customer is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. At December 31, 2009, we had the following levels of commitments to extend credit.

         
  Total Amount
Committed
  Commitment Expires in:
(Dollars in Thousand)   <1 Year   1 – 3 Years   4 – 5 Years   >5 Years
Letters of Credit   $ 3,089     $ 2,873     $ 216     $     $  
Commercial Commitment Letters     4,103       4,103                    
Residential loan origination     9,009       9,009                    
Home Equity Line of Credit Commitments     153,245             6       1       153,238  
Other Commitments to Extend Credit     116,412       69,441       2,208       16,065       28,698  
Total   $ 285,858     $ 85,426     $ 2,430     $ 16,066     $ 181,936  

We are a party to several off-balance sheet contractual obligations through lease agreements on a number of branch facilities. We have an obligation and commitment to make future payments under these contracts.

At December 31, 2009, we had the following levels of contractual obligations.

         
  Total Amount
of Obligations
  Payments Due per Period
(Dollars in Thousands)   <1 Year   1 – 3 Years   4 – 5 Years   >5 Years
Operating Leases   $ 5,201     $ 769     $ 1,274     $ 659     $ 2,499  
Capital Leases     1,209       40       92       102       975  
FHLBB Borrowings – Overnight     28,675       28,675                    
FHLBB Borrowings – Advances     209,710       70,133       67,107       41,099       31,371  
Commercial Repurchase Agreements     126,466       20,000       65,144       36,000       5,322  
Other Borrowed Funds     113,366       113,366                    
Junior Subordinated Debentures     43,512                         43,512  
Note Payable     909       302       487       103       17  
Other Contractual Obligations     443       334       109              
Total   $ 529,491     $ 233,619     $ 134,213     $ 77,963     $ 83,696  

Borrowings from the FHLB consist of short- and long-term fixed and variable rate borrowings and are collateralized by all stock in the FHLB and a blanket lien on qualified collateral consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages secured by one-to-four family properties, certain pledged investment securities and other qualified assets. Other borrowed funds include treasury, tax and loan deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements. We have an obligation and commitment to repay all borrowings and debentures. These commitments, borrowings, junior subordinated debentures and the related payments are made during the normal course of business.

We may use derivative instruments as partial hedges against large fluctuations in interest rates. We may also use fixed-rate interest rate swap and floor instruments to partially hedge against potentially lower yields on the variable prime rate loan category in a declining rate environment. If rates were to decline, resulting in reduced income on the adjustable rate loans, there would be an increased income flow from the interest rate swap and floor instruments. We may also use variable-rate interest rate swap and cap instruments to partially hedge against increases in short-term borrowing rates. If rates were to rise, resulting in an increased interest cost, there would be an increased income flow from the interest rate swap and cap instruments. These

39


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

financial instruments are factored into our overall interest rate risk position. We regularly review the credit quality of the counterparty from which the instruments have been purchased. At December 31, 2009, the Company had an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $20.0 million which expires on March 15, 2010, and two forward interest rate swaps, each with a notional amount of $10.0 million, related to the junior subordinated debentures, expiring on June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2029.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market rates/prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The ongoing monitoring and management of this risk is an important component of our asset/liability management process, which is governed by policies established by the Bank Board of Directors, and are reviewed and approved annually. The Board of Directors’ Asset/Liability Committee (“Board ALCO”) delegates responsibility for carrying out the asset/liability management policies to the Management Asset/Liability Committee (“Management ALCO”). In this capacity, Management ALCO develops guidelines and strategies impacting our asset/liability management-related activities based upon estimated market risk sensitivity, policy limits and overall market interest rate levels/trends. The Management ALCO and Board ALCO jointly meet on a quarterly basis to review strategies, policies, economic conditions and various activities as part of the management of these risks.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in market interest rates. As interest rates change, the interest income and expense streams associated with our financial instruments also change, thereby impacting net interest income (“NII”), the primary component of our earnings. Board and Management ALCO utilize the results of a detailed and dynamic simulation model to quantify the estimated exposure of NII to sustained interest rate changes. While Board and Management ALCO routinely monitor simulated NII sensitivity over a rolling 2-year horizon, they also utilize additional tools to monitor potential longer-term interest rate risk.

The simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income received and interest expense paid on all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected on our Statement of Condition, as well as for derivative financial instruments, if any. None of the assets used in the simulation were held for trading purposes. This sensitivity analysis is compared to ALCO policy limits, which specify a maximum tolerance level for NII exposure over a 1-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth, given a 200 basis point (“bp”) upward and 200 bp downward shift in interest rates. Although our policy specifies a downward shift of 200 bp, this could result in negative rates as many benchmark rates are currently below 2.00%. A parallel and pro rata shift in rates over a 12-month period is assumed. Using this approach, we are able to produce reports that illustrate the effect that both a gradual change of rates (year-1) and a “rate shock” (year-2 and beyond) has on margin expectations. In the down 100 bp scenario, Fed Funds and Treasury yields are floored at .01% while Prime is floored at 3.00%. All other market rates are floored at 0.25%.

40


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During the fourth quarter 2009 and 2008, our NII sensitivity analysis reflected the following changes to NII assuming no balance sheet growth and a parallel shift in interest rates over a 1-year horizon. All rate changes were “ramped” over the first 12-month period and then maintained at those levels over the remainder of the ALCO simulation horizon. In 2008 the +400 bps scenario was based on a flattening rate curve.

   
  Estimated Changes in NII
Rate Change   2009   2008
Year 1
                 
+400 bp     (0.60 )%      1.90 % 
+200 bp     (0.60 )%      0.60 % 
-100 bp     (0.90 )%      (0.10 )% 
Year 2
                 
+400 bp     (1.50 )%      6.90 % 
+200 bp     (0.80 )%      2.40 % 
-100 bp     (6.30 )%      (4.30 )% 

The preceding sensitivity analysis does not represent a forecast and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results. These hypothetical estimates are based upon numerous assumptions including, among others, the nature and timing of interest rate levels, yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits and reinvestment/replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While assumptions are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, we cannot make any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.

The most significant factors affecting the changes in market risk exposure during 2009 were the decrease in the investment balances, lower cost of retail deposits, and an increase in lower cost overnight borrowings that resulted in an overall reduction in the cost of funds that outpaced the drop in the yield on average assets. If rates remain at or near current levels and the balance sheet mix remains similar, net interest income is projected to trend slightly downward as funding cost reductions slow and the asset base continues to adjust lower. In a falling interest rate environment, net interest income is expected to trend in line with the base case scenarios before developing a downward trend thereafter. Beyond the first year, opportunities to reduce funding costs become even more difficult while accelerated prepayments continue to drive asset yields lower; resulting in tighter spreads and a decrease in expected net interest income. In the initial stages of a rising rate environment, net interest income is projected to trend in line with the base scenarios over the first year. Thereafter, funding costs stabilize and the asset base continues to be reprice or replaced at higher levels, causing an upward trend to extend throughout the remaining simulation period. If the yield curve were to flatten as rate rise, pressure on net interest income would be greater. The risk in the various rate scenarios is within our policy limits.

Periodically, if deemed appropriate, we use interest rate swaps, floors and caps, which are common derivative financial instruments, to hedge interest rate risk position. The Board of Directors has approved hedging policy statements governing the use of these instruments. As of December 31, 2009, we had a notional principal amount of $20.0 million in an interest rate cap agreement and a notional principal amount of $20.0 million in interest rate swap agreements related to the junior subordinated debentures. Board and Management ALCO monitor derivative activities relative to its expectation and our hedging policies. These instruments are more fully described in Notes 1 and 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Market Risk

We are also subject to other market risks, including but not limited to, operational risks, actions of government agencies, solvency of counter-parties, changes in investment markets, and changes in consumer demand. For further descriptions of these additional market risks, refer to Risk Factors with Item 1A.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on our financial statements.

41


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Related Party Transactions

The Bank is permitted, in its normal course of business, to make loans to certain officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries under terms that are consistent with the Bank’s lending policies and regulatory requirements. In addition to extending loans to certain officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries on terms consistent with the Bank’s lending policies, federal banking regulations also require training, audit and examination of the adherence to this policy by representatives of the federal and national regulators (also known as “Regulation O” requirements). As described more fully in Notes 4 and 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we have not entered into significant non-lending related party transactions.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The information contained in the Market Risk section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation is incorporated herein by reference.

42


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

   
  December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)   2009   2008
ASSETS
                 
Cash and due from banks   $ 29,772     $ 35,195  
Securities
                 
Securities available for sale, at fair value     479,708       606,031  
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $39,639 and $41,954 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively)     37,914       42,040  
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost     21,965       21,969  
Total securities     539,587       670,040  
Trading account assets     1,725       1,304  
Loans     1,526,758       1,500,908  
Less allowance for loan losses     (20,246 )      (17,691 ) 
Net loans     1,506,512       1,483,217  
Goodwill     41,780       41,857  
Bank-owned life insurance     41,677       40,459  
Premises and equipment, net     26,054       25,872  
Prepaid FDIC assessment     8,197        
Interest receivable     7,236       8,325  
Other real estate owned     5,479       4,024  
Core deposit intangible     4,016       4,518  
Other assets     23,348       26,685  
Total assets   $ 2,235,383     $ 2,341,496  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                 
Deposits:
                 
Demand   $ 193,549     $ 180,407  
Interest checking, savings and money market     675,681       632,664  
Retail certificates of deposit     545,789       593,013  
Brokered deposits     80,788       83,433  
Total deposits     1,495,807       1,489,517  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances     209,710       258,925  
Other borrowed funds     272,916       359,470  
Junior subordinated debentures     43,512       43,410  
Accrued interest and other liabilities     22,877       23,774  
Total liabilities     2,044,822       2,175,096  
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6, 14, 15, 17 and 19)
                 
Shareholders’ Equity
                 
Common stock, no par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 7,644,837 and 7,638,713 shares on December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively     50,062       48,984  
Retained earnings     133,634       118,564  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of tax     7,083       (89 ) 
Net unrealized gains on derivative instruments, at fair value, net of tax     739        
Net unrecognized losses on postretirement plans, net of tax     (957 )      (1,059 ) 
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     6,865       (1,148 ) 
Total shareholders’ equity     190,561       166,400  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 2,235,383     $ 2,341,496  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

43


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

     
  Years Ended December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)   2009   2008   2007
Interest Income
                          
Interest and fees on loans   $ 84,901     $ 96,716     $ 84,603  
Interest on U.S. government and sponsored enterprise obligations     25,851       25,750       19,053  
Interest on state and political subdivision obligations     2,450       2,695       1,674  
Interest on federal funds sold and other investments     129       1,959       2,406  
Total interest income     113,331       127,120       107,736  
Interest Expense
                          
Interest on deposits     22,577       31,700       36,452  
Interest on borrowings     14,898       22,250       19,033  
Interest on junior subordinated debentures     2,845       2,949       2,381  
Total interest expense     40,320       56,899       57,866  
Net interest income     73,011       70,221       49,870  
Provision for credit losses     8,213       4,397       100  
Net interest income after provision for credit losses     64,798       65,824       49,770  
Non-Interest Income
                          
Income from fiduciary services     5,902       6,453       4,914  
Service charges on deposit accounts     5,261       5,375       3,447  
Other service charges and fees     2,908       2,720       1,833  
Bank-owned life insurance     1,476       1,287       832  
Brokerage and insurance commissions     1,356       1,371       826  
Mortgage banking income (loss), net     1,314       (361 )      127  
Net securities gains (losses)     52       (624 )       
Other income     1,178       439       673  
Total non-interest income before other-than-temporary impairment of securities     19,447       16,660       12,652  
Other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities           (14,950 )       
Total non-interest income     19,447       1,710       12,652  
Non-Interest Expenses
                          
Salaries and employee benefits     24,588       24,093       18,486  
Furniture, equipment and data processing     4,359       4,574       2,917  
Regulatory assessments     4,035       1,041       507  
Net occupancy     3,908       4,023       2,739  
Consulting and professional fees     2,955       3,166       2,327  
Other real estate owned and collection costs     2,332       1,079       333  
Amortization of core deposit intangible     502       822       856  
Other expenses     8,350       8,018       5,521  
Total non-interest expenses     51,029       46,816       33,686  
Income before income taxes     33,216       20,718       28,736  
Income Taxes     10,443       5,383       8,453  
Net Income   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283  
Per Share Data
                          
Basic earnings per share   $ 2.98     $ 2.00     $ 3.09  
Diluted earnings per share   $ 2.97     $ 2.00     $ 3.09  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     7,642,492       7,674,827       6,557,102  
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding     7,665,357       7,680,412       6,565,194  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

           
           
(In Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)   Common
Stock
  Retained
Earnings
  Net
Unrealized
Gains (Losses) on Securities Available for Sale
  Net
Unrealized
Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments
  Net
Unrecognized
Losses on Postretirement Plans
  Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2006   $ 5,034     $ 105,959     $ (2,985 )    $ (198 )    $ (758 )    $ 107,052  
Net income for 2007           20,283                         20,283  
Adjustment to record derivative as economic hedge                       198             198  
Change in unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of taxes of ($2,424)
                4,501                   4,501  
Change in net unrecognized losses on post-retirement plans, net of taxes of ($3)
                            5       5  
Total comprehensive income           20,283       4,501       198       5       24,987  
Stock-based compensation expense     275                               275  
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock (total 10,743 shares)     13       235                         248  
Common stock repurchase (113,950 shares)     (171 )      (4,305 )                        (4,476 ) 
Cash dividends declared ($1.20 per share)           (7,883 )                        (7,883 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2007     5,151       114,289       1,516             (753 )      120,203  
Net income for 2008           15,335                         15,335  
Change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of taxes of $864                 (1,605 )                  (1,605 ) 
Change in net unrecognized losses on post-retirement plans, net of taxes of $165
                            (306 )      (306 ) 
Total comprehensive income           15,335       (1,605 )            (306 )      13,424  
Shares issued during acquisition of Union Bankshares Company (1,222,497 shares)     43,523                               43,523  
Stock-based compensation expense     250                               250  
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock (total 12,005 shares)     194                               194  
Common stock repurchase (109,362 shares)     (134 )      (3,383 )                        (3,517 ) 
Cash dividends declared ($1.00 per share)           (7,677 )                        (7,677 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2008     48,984       118,564       (89 )            (1,059 )      166,400  
Net income for 2009           22,773                         22,773  
Change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of taxes of ($3,862)
                7,172                   7,172  
Change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments at fair value, net of taxes of ($398)                       739             739  
Change in net unrecognized losses on post-retirement plans, net of taxes of ($55)
                            102       102  
Total comprehensive income           22,773       7,172       739       102       30,786  
Stock-based compensation expense     1,072                               1,072  
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock (total 7,814 shares)     6                               6  
Common stock repurchased (1,690 shares)           (55 )                        (55 ) 
Cash dividends declared ($1.00 per share)           (7,648 )                        (7,648 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2009   $ 50,062     $ 133,634     $ 7,083     $ 739     $ (957 )    $ 190,561  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

     
  Years Ended December 31,
(In Thousands)   2009   2008   2007
Operating Activities
                          
Net income   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                          
Provision for credit losses     8,213       4,397       100  
Depreciation and amortization     2,688       2,303       1,390  
Stock-based compensation expense     1,072       250       275  
Decrease in interest receivable     1,089       869       390  
Amortization of intangible assets     578       897       856  
Net increase in trading assets     (421 )      (1,304 )       
Net securities (gains) losses     (52 )      624        
Other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities           14,950        
Increase in other real estate owned valuation allowance     1,006              
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale     (72,529 )             
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans     72,615              
Gain on sale of mortgage loans     (86 )             
Liquidation of defined benefit pension plan     (735 )      (2,000 )       
Increase in prepaid FDIC assessment     (8,197 )             
Increase in other assets     (1,532 )      (7,141 )      (2,624 ) 
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities     (3,811 )      (3,878 )      1,520  
Net cash provided by operating activities     22,671       25,302       22,190  
Investing Activities
                          
Acquisition of Union Bankshares Company           (29,028 )       
Proceeds from sale and maturities of securities held to maturity     4,038       90       439  
Proceeds from sales and maturities of securities available for sale     192,586       222,435       162,901  
Purchase of securities held to maturity           (39 )      (7,018 ) 
Purchase of securities available for sale     (55,460 )      (301,784 )      (168,852 ) 
Proceeds from redemption (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
          5,946       (1,877 ) 
Net (increase) decrease in loans     (30,226 )      8,289       71,110  
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance           (7,450 )       
Premium received on sale of branch           1,400        
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned     959       420        
Purchase of premises and equipment     (2,493 )      (1,073 )      (3,581 ) 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities     109,404       (100,794 )      53,122  
Financing Activities
                          
Net increase (decrease) in deposits     6,263       55,627       (67,750 ) 
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank long-term advances     11,663       201,094       104,858  
Repayments on Federal Home Loan Bank long-term advances     (60,879 )      (270,077 )      (85,069 ) 
Net change in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings     (128,160 )      78,994       (88,730 ) 
Net increase in other borrowed funds     40,604       36,919       57,356  
(Decrease) increase in note payable     714       (10,020 )      10,000  
Common stock repurchase     (55 )      (3,517 )      (4,476 ) 
Exercise of stock options     6       194       248  
Cash dividends paid on common stock     (7,654 )      (7,317 )      (6,317 ) 
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities     (137,498 )      81,897       (79,880 ) 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents     (5,423 )      6,405       (4,568 ) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year     35,195       28,790       33,358  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year   $ 29,772     $ 35,195     $ 28,790  
Supplemental information
                          
Interest paid   $ 41,349     $ 57,440     $ 58,212  
Income taxes paid     8,250       10,924       7,752  
Common stock issued in acquisition           43,523        
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned     3,420       3,924       410  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

46


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Camden National Corporation (the “Company”), a Maine corporation, is the bank holding company for Camden National Bank (the “Bank”) and Acadia Trust, N.A. The Bank serves individuals, businesses, municipalities and non-profits through a network of 37 banking offices and ATMs in Maine. Acadia Trust, N.A. provides trust and investment management services to their clients, who are primarily located in the State of Maine, and to the clients of the Bank.

On January 3, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Union Bankshares Company of Ellsworth, Maine, including its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Trust Company. Immediately after the acquisition, Union Trust was merged into Camden National Bank. The financial results of Union Trust are included in the Company’s financial results beginning on the January 3, 2008 acquisition date.

The accounting and reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to general practice within the banking industry. The following is a summary of the significant accounting and reporting policies.

Principles of Consolidation.  The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank (a wholly owned bank subsidiary), and Acadia Trust, N.A. (a wholly owned non-bank subsidiary). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Assets held by the non-bank subsidiary in a fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Company and, therefore, are not included in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The Company also owns 100% of the common stock of Camden Capital Trust A and Union Bankshares Capital Trust I. These entities are unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Company.

Reclassifications.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements.  The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could vary from these estimates. Several estimates are particularly critical and are susceptible to significant near-term change, including the allowance for loan losses (“ALL”), other real estate owned, postretirement benefits and asset impairment judgments including other-than-temporary declines in the value of securities and the recoverability of goodwill, other intangible assets and deferred tax assets.

Subsequent Events.  The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2009 for potential recognition or disclosure as required by GAAP.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  For the purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and amounts due from banks. The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve System to maintain non-interest bearing cash reserves equal to a percentage of deposits. The Company maintains the reserve balances in cash on hand or at the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”).

Securities.  Marketable equity and debt securities are classified as either available for sale securities or held to maturity securities. Management determines the classification of a security at the time of its purchase.

Securities for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and reported at amortized cost. All other securities are classified as available for sale and reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on securities classified as available for sale are reported on an after-tax basis in shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and FRB stocks are non-marketable equity securities reported at cost and evaluated for impairment.

47


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and reported in non-interest income.

Management conducts a periodic review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if the decline in fair value of any security appears to be other than temporary. The factors considered by management in its periodic review include, but are not limited to: the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the ratings of the security, whether the decline in fair value appears to be issuer specific or, alternatively, a reflection of general market or industry conditions, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value.

Declines in the fair value of individual equity securities that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in non-interest income when identified. For individual debt securities where the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of the debt security related to 1) credit loss is recognized in non-interest income and 2) other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income or loss. Credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of expected future cash flows using the interest rate at acquisition is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. For individual debt securities where the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost, the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s cost basis and its fair value at the date of the consolidated statement of condition.

The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Boston. As a requirement of membership, the Company must own a minimum amount of FHLB stock based on the level of its FHLB advances. No market exists for shares of the FHLB and therefore they are carried at par value. FHLB stock may be redeemed at par value five years following termination of FHLB membership, subject to limitations which may be imposed by the FHLB or its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board, to maintain capital adequacy of the FHLB. While the Company currently has no intentions to terminate its FHLB membership, the ability to redeem its investment in FHLB stock would be subject to the conditions imposed by the FHLB. The FHLB has advised its members that it is focusing on preserving capital in response to ongoing market volatility and, accordingly, payment of quarterly dividends for 2009 was suspended and payment of quarterly dividends for 2010 is unlikely. Further, the FHLB has placed a moratorium on excess stock repurchases from its members. The Company will continue to monitor its investment in FHLB stock.

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.  Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or market in the aggregate, with any adjustment for net unrealized losses reported in non-interest income. All other loans are reported at amortized cost adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALL and any deferred fees or cost. From time to time, management identifies and designates certain residential mortgage loans (either newly originated mortgage loans or held in the loan portfolio) for sale, and, accordingly, these loans are transferred to loans held for sale.

The ALL is established through provisions for credit losses charged to income. Losses on loans, including impaired loans, are charged to the ALL when all or a portion of a loan is deemed to be uncollectible. Recoveries of loans previously charged off are credited to the ALL when realized.

In determining the appropriate level of ALL, the Company uses a methodology to systematically measure the amount of estimated loan loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio. The methodology includes four elements: (1) identification of loss allocations for certain specific loans, (2) loss allocation factors for certain loan types based on credit grade and loss experience, (3) general loss allocations for other environmental factors, and (4) unallocated allowance. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful,

48


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The Company uses a risk rating system to determine the credit quality of loans and applies the related loss allocation factors. In assessing the risk rating of a particular loan, the Company considers, among other factors, the obligor’s debt capacity, financial condition and flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources of repayment, the performance with respect to loan terms, the adequacy of collateral, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry in which the obligor operates. These factors are based on an evaluation of historical information, as well as subjective assessment and interpretation of current conditions. Emphasizing one factor over another, or considering additional factors that may be relevant in determining the risk rating of a particular loan but which are not currently an explicit part of our methodology, could impact the risk rating assigned to that loan. The Company periodically reassesses and revises the loss allocation factors used in the assignment of loss exposure to appropriately reflect the analysis of loss experience. Portfolios of more homogenous populations of loans including residential mortgages and consumer loans are analyzed as groups taking into account delinquency rates and other economic conditions which may affect the ability of borrowers to meet debt service requirements, including interest rates and energy costs. The Company also considers the results of regulatory examinations, historical loss ranges, portfolio composition, and other changes in the portfolio. An additional allocation is determined based on a judgmental process whereby management considers qualitative and quantitative assessments of other environmental factors. Finally, an unallocated portion of the total allowance is maintained to allow for shifts in portfolio composition and account for uncertainty in the economic environment.

Since the methodology is based upon historical experience and trends as well as management’s judgment, factors may arise that result in different estimations. Significant factors that could give rise to changes in these estimates may include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions in the market area, concentration of risk, declines in local property values, and results of regulatory examinations.

Loans past due 30 days or more are considered delinquent. In general, consumer loans will be charged off if the loan is delinquent for 90 consecutive days. Commercial and real estate loans may be charged off in part or in full if they appear uncollectible.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate, and construction loans by one of three measures: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; the loan’s observable market price; or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. As such, the Company does not typically identify individual loans within these groupings as impaired loans for impairment evaluation and disclosure.

Interest and Fees on Loans.  Interest on loans is accrued at the contractual rate and credited to income based upon the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees received and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized in interest income as an adjustment of loan yield. A loan is classified as non-accrual generally when it becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal payments. All previously accrued but unpaid interest on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income in the current period. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans (including impaired loans) are applied as a reduction of principal. A loan remains on non-accrual status until all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

49


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible.  Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but rather is evaluated at least annually for impairment. Any impairment write-down would be charged to non-interest expense. Goodwill is evaluated at least annually for impairment utilizing several standard valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analyses, bank merger multiples, and an estimation of the impact of business conditions and investor activities on the long-term value of the goodwill.

Core deposit intangible represents the estimated value of acquired customer relationships and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of those relationships (10 years from the acquisition dates). On an ongoing basis, management reviews the valuation and amortization of intangible assets to determine possible impairment.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance.  Bank-owned life insurance represents the cash surrender value (“CSV”) of life insurance policies on the lives of certain active and retired employees where the Company is the beneficiary. The CSV of the policies is recorded as an asset. Increases in the CSV of the policies, as well as death benefits received, net of any CSV, are recorded in non-interest income, and are not subject to income taxes.

Premises and Equipment.  Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.

Other Real Estate Owned.  Other real estate owned (“OREO”) properties acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure are recorded initially at estimated fair value less costs to sell. Any write-down of the recorded investment in the related loan is charged to the ALL upon transfer to OREO. Thereafter, any further declines in the property’s values are recorded against current earnings. Upon acquisition of a property, a current appraisal or a broker’s opinion is used to substantiate fair value for the property.

Mortgage Servicing.  Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when servicing rights are acquired through the sale of residential mortgage loans with servicing retained. Capitalized servicing rights, which are reported in other assets, are initially recorded at fair value and are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future servicing of the underlying mortgages. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and terms. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Impairment for an individual stratum is recognized through earnings to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the stratum.

Other Borrowed Funds.  Other borrowed funds consist of commercial and retail repurchase agreements, FHLB overnight borrowings, federal funds purchased, line of credit advances, notes payable, and treasury, tax and loan deposits. Retail repurchase agreements generally mature within 30 days and are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. Commercial repurchase agreements are callable quarterly, generally 6 to 24 months after issuance, and mature within five years. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Treasury, tax and loan deposits generally do not have fixed maturity dates.

Income Taxes.  Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax implications attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or

50


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Earnings per Share.  Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if certain securities or other contracts to issue common stock (such as stock options) were exercised or converted into additional common shares that would then share in the earnings of the Company. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year, plus an incremental number of common-equivalent shares computed using the treasury stock method.

Effective January 1, 2009, in accordance with new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, unvested share-based payment awards, which include the right to receive non-forfeitable dividends, are considered to participate with common stock in undistributed earnings for purposes of computing EPS. Accordingly, share-based payment awards considered to be participating securities, are required to calculate basic and diluted EPS amounts under the two-class method. Restricted share grants and management stock purchase grants are considered participating securities pursuant to this guidance. Calculations of EPS under the two-class method (i) exclude any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities from the numerator and (ii) exclude the dilutive impact of the participating securities from the denominator. EPS amounts for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been presented in accordance with these requirements.

Postretirement and Supplemental Retirement Plans.  The Company sponsors a postretirement health care plan and life insurance to certain eligible retired employees. The cost of providing postretirement benefits is accrued during the active service period of the employee. A supplemental retirement plan is also maintained for certain officers of the Company. The supplemental retirement plan is accrued on a current basis and recognizes costs over the estimated employee service period.

Stock-Based Compensation.  The fair value of restricted stock and stock options is determined on the date of grant and amortized to compensation expense, with a corresponding increase in common stock, over the longer of the service period or performance period, but in no event beyond an employee’s retirement date. For performance-based restricted stock, the Company estimates the degree to which performance conditions will be met to determine the number of shares that will vest and the related compensation expense. Compensation expense is adjusted in the period such estimates change. Non-forfeitable dividends, if any, paid on shares of restricted stock are recorded to retained earnings for shares that are expected to vest and to compensation expense for shares that are not expected to vest.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related Financial Instruments.  In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into commitments to extend credit, including commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded as loans when they are funded.

Derivative Financial Instruments Designated as Hedges.  The Company recognizes all derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of Condition at fair value. On the date the Company enters into the derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative as a hedge of either a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”), a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value hedge”), or a held for trading instrument (“trading instrument”). The Company formally documents relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items. Changes in fair value of a derivative that is effective and that qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income or loss and are reclassified into

51


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

earnings when the forecasted transaction or related cash flows affect earnings. Changes in fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a fair value hedge and the change in fair value of the hedged item are both recorded in earnings and offset each other when the transaction is effective. Those derivatives that are classified as trading instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, that it is unlikely that the forecasted transaction will occur, or that the designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

Segment Reporting.  The Company, through its bank and non-bank subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services to individuals and companies in the State of Maine. These services include lending, demand deposits, savings and time deposits, cash management, brokerage and trust services. While the Company’s management monitors operations of each subsidiary, substantially all revenues and profits are derived by the Bank from banking products and services. Revenues and profits derived, and assets owned by Acadia Trust are less than 10% of the consolidated Company totals and, accordingly, the Company and its subsidiaries are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. Under the Statement, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) became the sole source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became non-authoritative. This Statement is now included in the Codification as FASB ASC 105-10. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. In the FASB’s view, the issuance of this Statement and the Codification will not change GAAP, except for those nonpublic nongovernmental entities that must now apply the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Inquiry Service Section 5100, “Revenue Recognition,” paragraphs 38 – 76, now part of ASC Topic 985. Management adopted ASC 105-10 in 2009 and there was no material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 (now incorporated into the Codification as ASC 860-10-65), Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, to improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets resulting from 1) practices that have developed since the issuance of certain guidance in ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that guidance and 2) concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of transferors. This Statement must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of ASC 860-10-65 and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (now incorporated into the Codification as part of ASC 810-10), Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), to amend certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The Statement is effective as of the beginning of each

52


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company will review the requirements of this Statement and comply with its requirements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which updates ASC 820-10. The update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

(1) A valuation technique that uses a.) the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, or b.) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets.
(2) Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Examples include an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.

This standard is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after August 2009. The Company will adopt ASU 2009-05 effective for the quarter ending December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-6, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, to amend the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance will become effective with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward activities for any Level 3 fair value measurements, which will become effective with the reporting period beginning January 1, 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2. Acquisition of Union Bankshares Company

On January 3, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Union Bankshares Company of Ellsworth, Maine, including its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Trust Company, for $72.6 million. The agreement provided for the acquisition of Union Bankshares Company with and into the Company, with the Company being the surviving corporation. Promptly thereafter, Union Trust Company merged with and into the Bank with the Bank being the surviving institution. The acquisition brings together two Maine-based community banking institutions, each with a 100-plus year history, and provides a natural extension of the Company’s geographic reach to Hancock County and the Downeast Maine area, while adding 16,000 households and businesses to which the Bank can market its expanded products and services. The trust department of Union Trust is managed for the Bank by the Company’s trust and investment subsidiary, Acadia Trust, N.A. The operating results of Union Trust have been included with those of the Company since the acquisition date.

53


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

2. Acquisition of Union Bankshares Company  – (continued)

Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 1,222,497 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $43.5 million, and paid $29.0 million in cash in exchange for all outstanding Union Trust shares. The value of the common stock issued was determined based on the trailing average for the 10-day period before the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and announced, excluding the high and low prices for that period.

The Company’s cost to acquire Union Trust was as follows:

 
Cash paid to Union Trust shareholders   $ 29,028  
Common stock issued to Union Trust shareholders     43,523  
Total consideration     72,551  
Professional fees and other acquisition costs     1,186  
Total acquisition cost   $ 73,737  

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at January 3, 2008.

   
  Fair
Value
  Fair Value
Hierarchy
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 17,028       Level 1  
Securities     121,408       Level 2  
FRB and FHLB stock     8,025       Level 2  
Loans, net     362,238       Level 2  
Goodwill     37,866       n/a  
Bank-owned life insurance     9,478       Level 2  
Bank premises and equipment, net     9,162       n/a  
Identifiable intangible assets     5,773       n/a  
Other assets     9,555       n/a  
Total assets acquired     580,533        
Deposits     (331,545 )      Level 2  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances     (58,634 )      Level 2  
Other borrowed funds     (99,446 )      Level 2  
Junior subordinated debentures     (7,224 )      Level 2  
Accrued interest and other liabilities     (9,947 )      n/a  
Total liabilities assumed     (506,796 )       
Total acquisition cost   $ 73,737        

The $5.8 million of acquired intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, includes $5.0 million of core deposit intangible, which has a weighted-average life of approximately 10 years, and $753,000 of trust relationship intangible, which also has a weighted-average life of approximately 10 years. The goodwill recognized in the acquisition of approximately $37.9 million was allocated between the Banking and Financial Services reporting units, with allocations of $34.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. As part of the acquisition, the Company transferred a lease and other fixed assets of a branch facility, and sold the related deposits, to another financial institution. As part of the sale of deposits, the Company received a deposit premium of $1.4 million, which was recorded in goodwill.

The unaudited pro forma financial information includes only the comparable prior year as the acquisition was near the beginning of the current year, and thus is reflected in the actual results for the year ended December 31, 2008. The pro forma information assumes that the Union Trust acquisition was consummated

54


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

2. Acquisition of Union Bankshares Company  – (continued)

on January 1, 2007, and is based on information available and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable. This pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations. The pro forma information is as follows:

 
  Year Ended
December 31,
2007
Interest income   $ 139,590  
Interest expense     73,821  
Net interest income     65,769  
Provision for loan losses     620  
Net interest income after provision     65,149  
Non-interest income     18,759  
Non-interest expense     50,451  
Income before income taxes     33,457  
Income taxes     9,367  
Net income   $ 24,090  
Basic earnings per share   $ 3.10  
Diluted earnings per share   $ 3.09  

55


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

3. Securities

The following tables summarize the amortized costs and estimated fair values of securities available for sale and held to maturity, as of the dates indicated:

       
  Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
December 31, 2009
                                   
Available for sale
                                   
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 17,587     $ 473     $     $ 18,060  
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored enterprises     412,113       16,608       (365 )      428,356  
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations     34,121       12       (5,261 )      28,872  
Total debt securities     463,821       17,093       (5,626 )      475,288  
Equity securities     5,000             (580 )      4,420  
Total securities available for sale   $ 468,821     $ 17,093     $ (6,206 )    $ 479,708  
Held to maturity
                                   
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 37,914     $ 1,725     $     $ 39,639  
Total securities held to maturity   $ 37,914     $ 1,725     $     $ 39,639  
December 31, 2008
                                   
Available for sale
                                   
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored enterprises   $ 4,539     $ 64     $     $ 4,603  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions     25,457       105       (215 )      25,347  
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored enterprises     514,049       11,339       (52 )      525,336  
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations     57,123       1       (10,347 )      46,777  
Total debt securities     601,168       11,509       (10,614 )      602,063  
Equity securities     5,000             (1,032 )      3,968  
Total securities available for sale   $ 606,168     $ 11,509     $ (11,646 )    $ 606,031  
Held to maturity
                                   
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 42,040     $ 213     $ (299 )    $ 41,954  
Total securities held to maturity   $ 42,040     $ 213     $ (299 )    $ 41,954  

During 2009, the Company recorded proceeds of $7.5 million on the sale of investments classified as available for sale, which resulted in gross realized gains of $65,000. In addition, proceeds of $864,000 were recorded on the sale of investments classified as held to maturity which resulted in gross realized losses of $2,000. The sale in the held to maturity portfolio was due to a drop in credit rating. Unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during 2009 and included in other comprehensive income amounted to $11.1 million, which were offset by the reclassification of realized gains of $52,000 in the Statement of Income, net of deferred taxes of $3.9 million.

During 2008, the Company recorded proceeds of $18.5 million on the sale of investments classified as available for sale, which resulted in gross realized losses of $1.1 million and gross realized gains of $500,000. Unrealized losses on securities available for sale arising during 2008 and included in other comprehensive loss amounted to $18.0 million, which were offset by the reclassification of realized losses of $15.6 million in the Statement of Income, net of deferred taxes of $864,000. During 2007 there were no sales in the available for sale portfolio.

56


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

3. Securities  – (continued)

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, securities with an amortized cost of $506.7 million and $473.5 million and a fair value of $519.3 million and $478.7 million, respectively, were pledged to secure FHLB advances, public deposits, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2009 are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

   
  Amortized
Cost
  Fair
Value
Available for sale
                 
Due in one year or less   $ 4,927     $ 4,978  
Due after one year through five years     30,203       31,318  
Due after five years through ten years     56,420       58,021  
Due after ten years     372,271       380,971  
     $ 463,821     $ 475,288  
Held to maturity
                 
Due in one year or less   $ 167     $ 171  
Due after one year through five years     3,456       3,576  
Due after five years through ten years     29,773       31,210  
Due after ten years     4,518       4,682  
     $ 37,914     $ 39,639  

57


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

3. Securities  – (continued)

Management reviews the investment portfolio on a periodic basis to determine the cause, magnitude and duration of declines in the fair value of each security. Thorough evaluations of the causes of the unrealized losses are performed to determine whether the impairment is temporary or other than temporary in nature. Considerations such as the ability of the securities to meet cash flow requirements, levels of credit enhancements, risk of curtailment, recoverability of invested amount over a reasonable period of time and the length of time the security is in a loss position, for example, are applied in determining other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. The following table shows the unrealized gross losses and estimated fair values of investment securities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, by length of time that individual securities in each category have been in a continuous loss position.

           
  Less Than 12 Months   12 Months or More   Total
     Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses   Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses   Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2009
                                                     
Mortgage-backed securities   $ 25,003     $ (364 )    $ 57     $ (1 )    $ 25,060     $ (365 ) 
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations                 27,910       (5,261 )      27,910       (5,261 ) 
Equity securities                 4,420       (580 )      4,420       (580 ) 
Total   $ 25,003     $ (364 )    $ 32,387     $ (5,842 )    $ 57,390     $ (6,206 ) 
December 31, 2008
                                                     
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $ 32,393     $ (477 )    $ 770     $ (37 )    $ 33,163     $ (514 ) 
Mortgage-backed securities     18,440       (38 )      4,407       (14 )      22,847       (52 ) 
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations     37,106       (6,193 )      9,652       (4,154 )      46,758       (10,347 ) 
Equity securities     3,968       (1,032 )                  3,968       (1,032 ) 
Total   $ 91,907     $ (7,740 )    $ 14,829     $ (4,205 )    $ 106,736     $ (11,945 ) 

At December 31, 2009, $57.4 million of the Company’s investment securities had unrealized losses that are primarily considered temporary. A large portion of the unrealized loss was related to the private issue collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), which includes $9.6 million that have been downgraded to non-investment grade. The Company’s share of these downgraded CMOs is in the senior tranches. Management believes the unrealized loss for the CMOs is the result of current market illiquidity and the underestimation of value in the market. Including the CMOs, there were 21 securities with a fair value of $32.4 million in the portfolio which had unrealized losses for twelve months or longer. Management currently has the intent and ability to retain these investment securities with unrealized losses until the decline in value has been recovered. Stress tests are performed regularly on the higher risk bonds in the portfolio using current statistical data to determine expected cash flows and forecast potential losses. The results of the stress tests at December 31, 2009, reflect no current credit loss in the base case, but did reflect potential future losses. Based on this analysis the Company recorded an $11,000 OTTI write-down on two private issue CMOs.

At December 31, 2009, the Company held Duff & Phelps Select Income Fund Auction Preferred Stock with an amortized cost of $5.0 million which failed at auction during 2008. The security is rated Triple-A by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. Management believes the failed auctions are a temporary liquidity event related to this asset class of securities. The Company is currently collecting all amounts due according to contractual terms and have the ability and intent to hold the securities until they clear auction, are called, or mature; therefore, the securities are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

58


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

3. Securities  – (continued)

At December 31, 2008, $106.7 million of the Company’s investment securities had unrealized losses that were considered temporary. The portfolio contained 16 securities, with a fair value of $14.9 million, that had unrealized losses for twelve months or longer. During 2008, the Company recorded a $14.95 million OTTI write-down on Auction Pass-Through Certificates collateralized by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) Preferred Stock with an amortized cost of $14.95 million. The income tax benefit related to this write-down was $5.2 million. On September 6, 2008, the U.S. Treasury Department placed Freddie Mac in conservatorship and, as a result, the payment of dividends ceased on all Freddie Mac issued stock, including the preferred stock supporting the auction pass-through certificates, and the Freddie Mac preferred stock collateralizing the securities severely declined in value.

4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The composition of the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31 was as follows:

   
  2009   2008
Residential real estate loans   $ 627,979     $ 620,956  
Commercial real estate loans     434,783       400,312  
Commercial loans     191,214       213,683  
Consumer loans     273,106       265,865  
Deferred loan fees net of costs     (324 )      92  
Total loans   $ 1,526,758     $ 1,500,908  

The Company’s lending activities are primarily conducted in Maine. The Company makes single family and multi-family residential loans, commercial real estate loans, business loans, municipal loans and a variety of consumer loans. In addition, the Company makes loans for the construction of residential homes, multi-family properties and commercial real estate properties. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company sold $72.5 million of fixed-rate residential mortgage loans on the secondary market, which resulted in a net gain on the sale of loans of $86,000. The Company did not sell mortgage loans in 2008 and 2007. The ability and willingness of borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is generally dependent on the level of overall economic activity within the geographic area and the general economy.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, non-accrual loans were $17.9 million and $12.5 million, respectively. Interest foregone was approximately $961,000, $838,000 and $535,000 for 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

The Company, in the normal course of business, has made loans to its subsidiaries, and certain officers, directors, and their associated companies, under terms that are consistent with the Company’s lending policies and regulatory requirements. Loans to related parties that in aggregate exceed $60,000 were as follows:

   
  2009   2008
Balance, January 1,   $ 11,082     $ 11,889  
Loans made/advanced and additions     643       2,164  
Repayments and reductions     (2,267 )      (2,971 ) 
Balance, December 31,   $ 9,458     $ 11,082  

59


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses  – (continued)

The following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:

     
  December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Balance at beginning of year   $ 17,691     $ 13,653     $ 14,933  
Loans charged off     (6,456 )      (5,553 )      (2,192 ) 
Recoveries on loans previously charged off     849       825       812  
Net charge-offs     (5,607 )      (4,728 )      (1,380 ) 
Acquired from Union Trust           4,369        
Provision for loan losses     8,162       4,397       100  
Balance at end of year   $ 20,246     $ 17,691     $ 13,653  

The ALL is management’s best estimate of inherent risk of loss in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for potential losses based on a number of factors. If our assumptions are wrong, our ALL may not be sufficient to cover our losses and may cause us to increase the allowance in the future. Among the factors that could affect our ability to collect our loans and require us to increase the allowance in the future are: general real estate and economic conditions; regional credit concentration; industry concentration, for example in the hospitality, tourism and recreation industries; and a requirement by our Federal and state regulators to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize additional charge-offs.

Information regarding impaired loans is as follows:

     
  December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Average investment in impaired loans   $ 17,008     $ 13,354     $ 7,610  
Interest income recognized on impaired loans, cash basis     431       498       456  
Balance of impaired loans     17,940       12,501       10,625  
Portion of impaired loan balance for which an allowance for loan losses is allocated     17,940       12,501       10,625  
Portion of allowance for loan losses allocated to the impaired loan balance     1,805       1,343       1,694  

5. Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible

In 2008, the Company acquired $37.9 million of goodwill, $5.0 million of core deposit intangible and $753,000 of trust relationship intangible related to the acquisition of Union Bankshares Company (“Union Bankshares”). During the first quarter of 2009, the Company completed its final adjustments to the goodwill related to the Union Bankshares acquisition. The changes in goodwill, core deposit intangible and trust relationship intangible for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the table below:

     
  Goodwill
     Banking   Financial
Services
  Total
Balance at December 31, 2007   $ 473     $ 3,518     $ 3,991  
2008 Activity     34,324       3,542       37,866  
Balance at December 31, 2008     34,797       7,060       41,857  
2009 Activity     (77 )            (77 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2009   $ 34,720     $ 7,060     $ 41,780  

60


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

5. Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible  – (continued)

     
  Core Deposit Intangible
     Total   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Balance at December 31, 2007   $ 9,424     $ (9,104 )    $ 320  
2008 Activity     5,020       (822 )      4,198  
Balance at December 31, 2008     14,444       (9,926 )      4,518  
2009 Activity           (502 )      (502 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2009   $ 14,444     $ (10,428 )    $ 4,016  

     
  Trust Relationship Intangible
     Total   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Balance at December 31, 2007   $     $     $  
2008 Activity     753       (75 )      678  
Balance at December 31, 2008     753       (75 )      678  
2009 Activity           (76 )      (76 ) 
Balance at December 31, 2009   $ 753     $ (151 )    $ 602  

The annual impairment evaluation of goodwill did not identify any impairment in 2009 or 2008. The following table reflects the expected amortization schedule for intangible assets at December 31, 2009:

   
  Core Deposit
Intangible
  Trust Relationship
Intangible
2010   $ 502     $ 75  
2011     502       75  
2012     502       75  
2013     502       75  
2014     502       75  
Thereafter     1,506       227  
Total unamortized intangible   $ 4,016     $ 602  

6. Premises and Equipment

Details of premises and equipment, at cost, at December 31 were as follows:

   
  2009   2008
Land and land improvements   $ 2,543     $ 2,680  
Buildings and leasehold improvements     29,509       29,321  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment     19,971       18,020  
Total cost     52,023       50,021  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization     (25,969 )      (24,149 ) 
Net premises and equipment   $ 26,054     $ 25,872  

Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.2 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Lease expense was approximately $789,000, $722,000 and $544,000 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A capital lease, assumed from Union Trust and recorded in other liabilities on the Statement of Condition, was entered into in March 2006 for a branch facility with payments extending until 2026 and an interest rate of 9.75% per year. The related asset, recorded in premises and equipment, has a cost

61


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

6. Premises and Equipment  – (continued)

basis of $855,000 and accumulated depreciation of $160,000. At December 31, 2009, under current operating and capital lease contracts, the Company had the following schedule of future minimum lease payments:

   
  Operating   Capital
2010   $ 769     $ 40  
2011     669       44  
2012     605       48  
2013     384       50  
2014     275       52  
Thereafter     2,499       975  
     $ 5,201     $ 1,209  

7. Other Real Estate Owned

OREO properties acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure are recorded at the fair value of the real estate, less costs to sell. Any write-down of the recorded investment in the related loan is charged to the allowance for loan losses upon transfer to OREO. Subsequent write-downs required for declines in value are recorded through a valuation allowance and a provision for losses charged to other non-interest expense.

Activity in other real estate owned was as follows:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Balance at beginning of year   $ 4,024     $ 400     $ 125  
Acquired from Union Trust           120        
Additions     3,420       3,924       410  
Increase in OREO valuation allowance     (1,006 )             
Properties sold     (959 )      (420 )      (135 ) 
Balance at end of year   $ 5,479     $ 4,024     $ 400  

8. Mortgage Servicing

Residential real estate mortgages are originated by the Company both for portfolio and for sale into the secondary market. The Company may sell its loans to institutional investors such as Freddie Mac. Under loan sale and servicing agreements with the investor, the Company generally continues to service the residential real estate mortgages. The Company pays the investor an agreed-upon rate on the loan, which is less than the interest rate received from the borrower. The Company retains the difference as a fee for servicing the residential real estate mortgages. The Company capitalizes mortgage servicing rights at their fair value upon sale of the related loans, amortizes the asset over the estimated life of the serviced loan, and periodically assesses the asset for impairment. The balance of capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net of a valuation allowance, included in other assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $810,000 and $139,000, respectively. For the same periods, the fair market value of the mortgage servicing rights approximated $965,000 and $174,000, respectively. In evaluating the reasonableness of the carrying values of mortgage servicing rights, the Company obtains third party valuations based on loan level data including note rate, type and term of the underlying loans. The model utilizes a variety of assumptions, the most significant of which are loan prepayment assumptions and the discount rate used to discount future cash flows. Prepayment assumptions, which are impacted by loan rates and terms, are calculated using a three-month moving average of weekly prepayment data published by the Public Securities Association and modeled against the serviced loan portfolio by the third party valuation specialist. The discount rate is the quarterly average 10-year U.S.

62


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

8. Mortgage Servicing  – (continued)

Treasury rate plus 4.22%. Other assumptions include delinquency rates, foreclosure rates, servicing cost inflation, and annual unit loan cost. All assumptions are adjusted periodically to reflect current circumstances. Amortization of the mortgage servicing rights, as well as write-offs of capitalized rights due to prepayments of the related mortgage loans, are recorded as a charge against mortgage servicing fee income.

The following summarizes mortgage servicing rights capitalized and amortized, along with the activity in the related valuation allowance:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Mortgage Servicing Rights:
                          
Balance at beginning of year   $ 139     $ 142     $ 324  
Acquired from Union Trust           1,199        
Capitalized upon sale     811              
Amortization charged against mortgage servicing fee income     (575 )      (734 )      (183 ) 
Valuation adjustment     435       (468 )      1  
Balance at end of year   $ 810     $ 139     $ 142  
Valuation Allowance:
                          
Balance at beginning of year   $ (469 )    $ (1 )    $ (2 ) 
Increase in impairment reserve           (490 )       
Reduction of impairment reserve     435       22       1  
Balance at end of year   $ (34 )    $ (469 )    $ (1 ) 

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Condition of the Company and amounted to $218.3 million, $190.5 million and $102.4 million at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with the foregoing loan servicing, and included in demand deposits, were $464,000 and $338,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

9. Deposits

The following is a summary of scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit as of December 31, 2009:

     
  Retail   Brokered   Total
2010   $ 405,409     $ 4,766     $ 410,175  
2011     78,819       10,000       88,819  
2012     16,935       11,805       28,740  
2013     9,097             9,097  
2014     28,738             28,738  
Thereafter     6,791             6,791  
Total   $ 545,789     $ 26,571     $ 572,360  

Certificates of deposit issued in amounts of $100,000 or more totaled $217.7 million and $238.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including brokered certificates of deposit of $26.6 million and $51.7 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company, in the normal course of business, has deposits from its subsidiaries, certain officers, directors, and their associated companies totaling $26.9 million and $16.3 million, respectively.

63


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

10. Borrowings

Other Borrowed Funds

Short-term borrowings consist of retail repurchase agreements, FHLB overnight borrowings and line of credit advances, and treasury, tax and loan deposits that are due within one year from the origination date. The Company, through its bank subsidiary, has an available line of credit with the FHLB of $9.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company had an outstanding balance on the line of credit with the FHLB at December 31, 2009 of $3.5 million which was paid off on January 4, 2010. The Company had no outstanding balance at December 31, 2008. Long-term borrowings represent securities sold under repurchase agreements with major brokerage firms and notes payable with maturity dates over one year. Both wholesale and retail repurchase agreements are secured by mortgage-backed securities and securities of government sponsored enterprises. The Company has $10.0 million in lines of credit with a maturity date of December 23, 2010.

The following table summarizes other borrowed funds outstanding at December 31:

   
  2009   2008
Short-term Borrowings:
                 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements – retail   $ 112,630     $ 71,808  
FHLB overnight     28,675       160,335  
Treasury, tax and loan deposits     736       562  
FHLB line of credit advance     3,500        
Total short-term borrowings     145,541       232,705  
Long-term Borrowings:
                 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements – commercial     126,466       126,577  
Notes payable     909       188  
Total long-term borrowings     127,375       126,765  
Total Other Borrowed Funds   $ 272,916     $ 359,470  

Information on the amounts outstanding and interest rates of short-term borrowings for each of the three years in the period ended December 31 are as follows:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Balance outstanding at end of year   $ 145,541     $ 232,705     $ 73,333  
Average daily balance outstanding   $ 190,142     $ 154,583     $ 118,811  
Maximum balance outstanding at any month end   $ 277,562     $ 232,705     $ 201,669  
Weighted average interest rate for the year     1.92 %      2.37 %      4.05 % 
Weighted average interest rate at end of year     1.06 %      0.74 %      3.36 % 

The securities sold under repurchase agreements — commercial are fixed rate borrowings, which are callable quarterly, with the following schedule of maturities, rate and year in which the instrument became or becomes callable, as of December 31, 2009:

     
  Amount   Rate   Callable
2010   $ 20,000       4.82 %      2007  
2012     65,144       4.75 %      2008 – 2009  
2013     36,000       3.33 %      2011  
2017     5,322       4.67 %      2008  
Total   $ 126,466       4.35 %       

64


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

10. Borrowings  – (continued)

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualified collateral consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages secured by one-to-four family properties, certain commercial real estate loans, certain pledged investment securities and other qualified assets. The carrying value of residential real estate and commercial loans pledged as collateral was $709.5 million and $650.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral at the FHLB was $28.3 million and $135.8 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The advances payable to the FHLB are summarized as follows:

       
  December 31, 2009   December 31, 2008
     Total
Outstanding
  Callable   Total
Outstanding
  Callable
Fixed Rate:
                                   
3.69% – 5.71% due in 2009   $     $     $ 57,283     $ 3,500  
2.60% – 6.36% due in 2010     70,054       11,500       66,555       11,500  
2.99% – 5.06% due in 2011     52,081       12,000       52,000       12,000  
3.27% – 7.23% due in 2012     15,085             15,079        
2.00% – 6.15% due in 2013     26,119       5,000       26,580       5,000  
2.99% – 3.35% due in 2014     15,000       10,000       10,000       10,000  
2.75% – 4.75% due in 2015     11,371       10,000       11,428       10,000  
3.99% – 4.06% due in 2017     20,000       20,000       20,000       20,000  
Total FHLB advances   $ 209,710     $ 68,500     $ 258,925     $ 72,000  

65


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

10. Borrowings  – (continued)

Junior Subordinated Debentures

In April 2006, the Company formed Camden Capital Trust A (“CCTA”), which issued and sold trust preferred securities to the public. The Company received $36.1 million from the issuance of the trust preferred securities in return for junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to CCTA. The Company owns all of the $1.1 million outstanding common securities of CCTA. The interest rate of the trust preferred securities is fixed at 6.71% through June 2011 and thereafter is a variable rate determined at the 3 month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 140 basis points. The proceeds from the offering were used to repurchase Company common stock under the tender offer completed in May 2006. The trust preferred securities, which pay interest quarterly at the same rate as the junior subordinated debentures held by CCTA, are mandatorily redeemable on June 30, 2036, or may be redeemed by CCTA at par any time on or after June 30, 2011.

In connection with the Union Trust acquisition, the Company assumed $8.0 million of trust preferred securities, held through a Delaware trust affiliate, Union Bankshares Capital Trust I (“UBCT”). In 2006, Union Trust issued an aggregate principal amount of $8.2 million of 30-year junior subordinated deferrable interest debt securities to UBCT. The Company owns all of the $248,000 outstanding common securities of UBCT. The debt securities obligate the Company to pay interest on their principal sum quarterly in arrears on January 7, April 7, July 7, and October 7 of each year. The interest rate of the trust preferred securities until 2011 is a blended rate equal to the sum of (1) the product of 50% times average three-month LIBOR plus 1.42%, plus (2) the product of 50% times 6.4725%, After 2011, the rate is average three-month LIBOR plus 1.42%. The debt securities mature on April 7, 2036, but may be redeemed by the Company, in whole or in part, beginning on April 7, 2011, on any interest payment date. The debt securities may also be redeemed by the Company in whole or in part, within 90 days of the occurrence of certain special redemption events as defined in the Indenture.

CCTA and UBCT are Delaware statutory trusts created for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds in junior subordinated debentures of the Company. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of the trusts. The Company is the owner of all of the common securities of CCTA and UBCT and fully and unconditionally guarantees each trust’s securities obligations. In accordance with GAAP, CCTA and UBCT are treated as unconsolidated subsidiaries. The common stock investment in the statutory trusts is included in “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Statement of Condition. Interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures totaled $2.8 million, $2.9 million and $2.4 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2009, $43.0 million of the trust preferred securities were included in the Company’s total Tier 1 capital and amounted to 23.9% of Tier 1 capital of the Company.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had two forward interest rate swaps, each with a notional of $10.0 million, related to the junior subordinated debentures, expiring on June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2029. As the interest on these debentures converts from a fixed interest rate to a variable rate on June 30, 2011, the Company swapped a portion of the variable cost for a fixed cost. One $10.0 million notional amount forward interest rate swaps is for ten years with a fixed cost of 5.09% maturing on June 20, 2021, and a second $10.0 million notional amount forward interest rate swap is for 18 years with a fixed cost of 5.84% maturing on June 30, 2029.

66


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

11. Income Taxes

The current and deferred components of income tax expense were as follows:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Current:
                          
Federal   $ 10,316     $ 8,463     $ 8,119  
State     407       341       340  
       10,723       8,804       8,459  
Deferred:
                          
Federal     (280 )      (3,421 )      (6 ) 
     $ 10,443     $ 5,383     $ 8,453  

The actual expense differs from the expected tax expense computed by applying the applicable U.S. federal corporate income tax rate to income before income taxes, as follows:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Computed tax expense   $ 11,626     $ 7,251     $ 10,058  
Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:
                          
Tax exempt income     (1,009 )      (1,038 )      (792 ) 
State taxes, net of federal benefit     265       221       221  
Income from life insurance     (450 )      (555 )      (291 ) 
Low income housing credits     (230 )      (485 )      (419 ) 
Historic rehabilitation credits                 (277 ) 
Other     241       (11 )      (47 ) 
     $ 10,443     $ 5,383     $ 8,453  

Items which give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the tax effect of each are as follows:

       
  2009   2008
     Asset   Liability   Asset   Liability
Allowance for possible losses on loans   $ 7,104     $     $ 6,192     $  
Allowance for investment losses     5,238             5,233        
Allowance for OREO valuation     366                    
Pension and other benefits     3,415             3,112        
Depreciation           1,252             1,261  
Deferred loan origination fees           1,152             1,223  
Deferred compensation and benefits     839             771        
Net unrealized gains/losses on investments available for sale and derivative instruments           4,208       48        
Net unrealized losses on postretirement plans     515             570        
Purchase accounting     1,188             1,662        
Deposit premium           941             700  
Mortgage servicing rights           284             49  
Prepaid expenses           656             506  
Other     145             499        
     $ 18,810     $ 8,493     $ 18,087     $ 3,739  

67


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

11. Income Taxes  – (continued)

The related income taxes have been calculated using a rate of 35%. No valuation allowance is deemed necessary for the net deferred tax asset, which is included in other assets.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the uncertain tax positions provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, ASC 740 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The provisions of ASC 740 have been applied to all tax positions of the Company as of January 1, 2007. Only tax positions that met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold on January 1, 2007 were recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption. The adoption of ASC 740 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The adoption of ASC 740 had no impact on the balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.

Although not currently under review, income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 are open to audit by federal and Maine authorities. If the Company, as a result of an audit, was assessed interest and penalties, the amounts would be recorded through other non-interest expense.

12. Shareholders’ Equity

Dividends

The primary source of funds available to the Company for payment of dividends to its shareholders is dividends paid to the Company by its subsidiaries. The Company’s subsidiaries are subject to certain requirements imposed by federal banking laws and regulations. These requirements, among other things, establish minimum levels of capital and restrict the amount of dividends that may be distributed by the subsidiaries to the Company. Under regulations prescribed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), without prior OCC approval a bank subsidiary may not declare dividends in any year in excess of the bank’s (i) net income for the current year, (ii) plus its retained net income for the prior two years. The Company declared $7.6 million, $7.7 million and $7.9 million in dividends to shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Common Stock Repurchase

In June 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2008 Common Stock Repurchase Program. Under the program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of its outstanding common stock for a one-year period. Under the 2008 Plan, the Company repurchased 50,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $32.00 during the second half of 2008 and made no repurchases in the first half of 2009. The authority, which expired on July 1, 2009, was not renewed for the coming year. In June 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company voted to authorize the Company to purchase up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Under the 2007 Plan, the Company repurchased 59,362 shares of common stock at an average price of $32.29, all of which were purchased during the first half of 2008.

In June 2009, the Company recorded receipt of 1,690 shares used to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligation in conjunction with a recipient’s restricted shares vesting.

68


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

13. Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method, as described in Note 1:

     
  2009   2008   2007
Net income, as reported   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283  
Weighted-average common shares outstanding –  basic     7,642,492       7,674,827       6,557,102  
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation     11,481       5,585       8,092  
Weighted-average common and potential common shares – diluted     7,653,973       7,680,412       6,565,194  
Basic earnings per share – common stock   $ 2.98     $ 2.00     $ 3.09  
Basic earnings per share – unvested share-based payment awards     2.98       2.00       3.09  
Diluted earnings per share – common stock     2.97       2.00       3.09  

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase 112,089 and 79,600 shares, respectively, of common stock were not considered in the computation of potential common shares for purposes of diluted EPS, since the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective periods.

14. Employee Benefit Plans

401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan

The Company has a 401(k) plan and the majority of all employees participate in the plan. Employees may contribute pre-tax contributions to the 401(k) plan up to the maximum amount allowed by federal tax laws. The Company makes matching contributions of up to 4% of their eligible compensation. The Company may make additional matching contributions subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and over the last three years have amounted to 3% of pre-tax compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, expenses under the plan amounted to $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $767,000, respectively.

Pension Plan

The Company, through its acquisition of Union Trust, had a qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all permanent full-time employees of the former Union Trust. Effective May 15, 2005, benefits accrued under this defined benefit plan were frozen based on participants’ then current service and pay levels. Prior to liquidation in December 2008, the fair value of plan assets totaled $2.3 million and the projected benefit obligation totaled $5.0 million resulting in an unfunded status of $2.7 million, which was recognized as a liability by the Company. A discount rate of 4.0% was used in determining the related pension obligation at December 31, 2008. There were no net actuarial losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at that date. Net periodic benefit income for this plan totaled $9,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The weighted average assumptions used to determine 2008 net periodic benefit income were (i) a discount rate of 4.5%, and (ii) an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.0%. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company contributed $2.0 million from the recorded liability to the plan, which was in the process of liquidation. On January 12, 2009, the Company paid out the remaining $735,000 liability related to this plan.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan

The Company sponsors unfunded, non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERP”) for certain officers. These agreements are designed to make up the shortfall (when compared to a non-highly compensated employee) in replacing income at retirement due to Internal Revenue Service compensation and

69


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

14. Employee Benefit Plans  – (continued)

benefit limits under the 401(k) Plan and Social Security. With a SERP in place, participants should be able to replace 65 – 75% of their final average compensation. For those eligible for benefits, the agreement provides for a minimum 15-year guaranteed benefit for all vested participants. In addition, the Company provides medical and life insurance to certain eligible retired employees under the other postretirement benefit plan.

The following table summarizes changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets for (i) the supplemental executive retirement plan and (ii) the other postretirement benefit plan as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.

       
  SERP   Other Postretirement Benefits
     2009   2008   2009   2008
Benefit obligations:
                                   
Beginning of year   $ 7,534     $ 4,640     $ 2,515     $ 1,176  
Acquisition           1,465             1,074  
Service cost     205       334       66       62  
Interest cost     418       404       136       137  
Actuarial (gain) loss     (86 )      942             186  
Benefits paid     (371 )      (251 )      (137 )      (120 ) 
End of year     7,700       7,534       2,580       2,515  
Fair value of plan assets:
                                   
Beginning of year                        
Employer contributions     371       251       137       120  
Benefits paid     (371 )      (251 )      (137 )      (120 ) 
End of year                        
Funded status at end of year, included in other liabilities   $ (7,700 )    $ (7,534 )    $ (2,580 )    $ (2,515 ) 

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not been recognized as components of net period benefit cost are as follows:

       
  SERP   Other Postretirement Benefits
     2009   2008   2009   2008
Unrecognized net actuarial loss   $ 1,075     $ 1,211     $ 279     $ 281  
Unrecognized prior service cost     118       137              
Net deferred tax benefit     (417 )      (472 )      (98 )      (98 ) 
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss   $ 776     $ 876     $ 181     $ 183  

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP was $7.5 million, and $6.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In 2010, approximately $30,000 and $19,000 in net actuarial losses and prior service cost, respectively, are expected to be recognized as components of net period benefit cost for the SERP, and approximately $2,000 in net actuarial loss is expected to be recognized for the other postretirement benefit plan.

70


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

14. Employee Benefit Plans  – (continued)

The components of net period benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income were as follows:

           
  SERP   Other Postretirement Benefits
     2009   2008   2007   2009   2008   2007
Net Period Benefit Cost Recognized in Net Income:
                                                     
Service cost   $ 205     $ 334     $ 310     $ 66     $ 62     $ 56  
Interest cost     418       404       260       136       137       64  
Recognized net actuarial loss     50       35       52       2             4  
Recognized prior service cost     19       18       18                    
Net period benefit cost     692       791       640       204       199       124  
Changes in Funded Status Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss:
                                                     
Net actuarial (gain) loss     (86 )      329       66             195        
Reclassifications to net period benefit cost Amortization of net unrecognized actuarial loss     (50 )      (35 )      (52 )      (2 )            (4 ) 
Amortization of prior service cost     (19 )      (18 )      (18 )                   
Net deferred tax expense (benefit)     55       (97 )      2             (68 )      1  
Recognized in other comprehensive loss     (100 )      179       (2 )      (2 )      127       (3 ) 
Total recognized in net period benefit cost and other comprehensive loss   $ 592     $ 970     $ 638     $ 202     $ 326     $ 121  

The following assumptions were used in determining benefit obligations and net period benefit costs:

           
  SERP   Other Postretirement Benefits
     2009   2008   2007   2009   2008   2007
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
                                                     
Discount rate     5.75 %      6.00 %      6.25 %      5.70 %      5.70 %      6.25 % 
Rate of compensation increase     4.50 %      4.50 %      4.50 %                   
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
                                                     
Discount rate     6.00 %      6.25 %      5.90 %      5.70 %      6.25 %      6.00 % 
Rate of compensation increase     4.50 %      4.50 %      4.50 %                   
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31:
                                                     
Health care cost trend rate assumed for future years                       7.00 %      7.00 %      7.00 % 

A 1.0% increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would not have a material impact on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation due to a built-in cap on annual benefits.

71


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

14. Employee Benefit Plans  – (continued)

In 2010, the expected contribution for the SERP is $501,000 and $214,000 for the other postretirement benefit plan. The expected benefit payments for the next ten years are presented in the following table:

   
  SERP   Other
Postretirement
Benefits
2010   $ 501     $ 141  
2011     501       149  
2012     486       149  
2013     483       156  
2014     349       165  
2015 – 2019     1,861       875  

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The effects of the Act on the accumulated projected benefit obligation or net period post-retirement benefit cost are not reflected in the financial statements or accompanying notes because the Company is unable to conclude whether the benefits provided by the Plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act.

15. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Stock-Based Compensation

On April 29, 2003, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The maximum number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan is 800,000 shares. Awards may be granted in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock, unrestricted stock, performance share and dividend equivalent rights, or any combination of the preceding, and the exercise price shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of incentive stock options, or 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of non-qualified stock options. Prior to April 29, 2003, the Company had various stock option plans with options vesting immediately upon grant and expiring ten years from the date of the option grant. The exercise price of all options equaled the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

Stock Option Awards

Stock options granted under the current Plan have been incentive stock options. Options granted vest based on five years of continuous service and have ten year contractual terms.

On the date of each grant, the fair value of each award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on assumptions made by the Company as follows:

Dividend yield is based on the dividend rate of the Company’s stock at the date of grant
Risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury bond rate with a term equaling the expected life of the granted options
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price
Expected life represents the period of time that granted options are expected to be outstanding based on historical trends

72


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

15. Stock-Based Compensation Plans  – (continued)

The following table presents the option pricing assumptions and the estimated fair value of the options using these assumptions.

     
  2009   2008   2007
Dividend yield     4.01 %      3.30 %      2.10 % 
Weighted average risk-free interest rate     1.60 %      3.44 %      4.77 % 
Weighted average expected volatility     42.89 %      28.28 %      26.66 % 
Weighted average expected life in years     5.20       5.80       5.00  
Weighted average fair value of options granted   $ 6.90     $ 6.47     $ 11.30  

Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period and totaled $189,000, $89,000 and $146,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost for nonvested stock options, which reflects an estimated annualized forfeiture rate of 5% per year over the vesting period, totaled $408,000 at December 31, 2009, and is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.0 years. No options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $60,000 and $167,000, respectively.

Stock option activity for 2009 is as follows:

       
  Number
of Shares
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value ($000)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008     91,600     $ 36.73                    
Granted     53,500       24.91                    
Forfeited     11,800       35.09              
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009     133,300     $ 32.13       7.3     $ 480  
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009     49,400     $ 35.76       5.5     $ 79  

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested stock options as of December 31, 2009 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

   
  Awards   Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009     53,500     $ 9.05  
Granted     53,500       6.90  
Vested     (16,400 )      8.83  
Forfeited     (6,700 )      8.39  
Nonvested at December 31, 2009     83,900     $ 7.77  

The fair value of the stock options vested during 2009 was $536,000 measured at the December 31, 2009 closing price of $32.70.

73


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

15. Stock-Based Compensation Plans  – (continued)

Restricted Stock Awards and Management Stock Purchase Plan

The Company issues restricted stock awards to certain key employees. Employees become fully vested in these shares generally after a three-year period, with requisite service conditions and no performance-based conditions to such vesting. The Company provides a Management Stock Purchase Plan (the “MSPP”) to provide an opportunity for management employees to receive restricted shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of their annual incentive bonus. Restricted shares under the MSPP are granted at a discount of one-third of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and fully vest two years after the grant date. During the vesting period, dividends are accrued on the restricted stock and the recipients are entitled to vote these restricted shares.

Compensation expense recognized in connection with the restricted stock awards and MSPP is presented in the following table:

     
  Year Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Restricted stock awards   $ 139     $ 144     $ 105  
Management stock purchase plan grants     21       17       23  
Total compensation expense   $ 160     $ 161     $ 128  
Related income tax benefit   $ 56     $ 56     $ 45  
Fair value of grants vested   $ 273     $ 86     $ 31  

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to restricted stock awards and stock purchase grants for the period indicated:

       
  Restricted Stock   Stock Purchase (MSPP)
     Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Number
of Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009     7,406     $ 37.99       3,262     $ 11.29  
Granted     2,000       24.46       3,339       6.57  
Vested     (6,975 )      37.61       (769 )      13.61  
Forfeited                 (440 )      8.56  
Nonvested at December 31, 2009     2,431     $ 39.71       5,392     $ 8.50  

At December 31, 2009, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards and stock purchase grants was $49,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 years.

Defined Contribution Retirement Plan

The Defined Contribution Retirement Plan (the “DCRP”) is an unfunded deferred compensation plan for the benefit of certain senior management employees of the Company. The Company’s Compensation Committee determines eligibility in the plan and annually participants will receive a credit to an account administered by the Company of 10% of each participant’s annual base salary and bonus for the prior performance period. Annual credits to a participant’s account will be denominated in Deferred Stock Awards (the right to receive a share of common stock of the Company upon the satisfaction of certain restrictions) based on the fair market value of the common stock of the Company on the date of grant. Vesting occurs ratably from the date of participation until the participant reaches the age of 65, at which time the participant is 100% vested. Upon retirement or termination of employment, the participant will receive shares of common

74


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

15. Stock-Based Compensation Plans  – (continued)

stock equal to the Deferred Stock Awards in the account multiplied by the vested percentage, reduced by the amount to be withheld for income taxes. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company granted 1,310 Deferred Stock Awards under the DCRP. Unrecognized stock compensation expense for the Deferred Stock Awards was $36,000 with a weighted-average remaining amortization period of 7 years at December 31, 2009.

Long-Term Performance Share Plan

The Long-term Performance Share Plan (“LTIP”) is intended to create incentives to allow the Company to attract and retain its executives who will contribute to its future success. It is further the intent of the Company that awards made under this plan will achieve the twin goals of aligning executive incentive compensation with increases in shareholder value and using equity compensation as a tool to retain key employees. The long-term performance period is a period of three consecutive years beginning on January 1 of the first year and ending on December 31 of the third year. Awards are based upon the attainment of certain performance targets on specific performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.

At December 31, 2009, there were 50,005 shares of performance-based share units that will vest only if certain revenue and expense goals or service conditions, as defined under the LTIP, are achieved. Failure to achieve the goals and service conditions will result in all or a portion of the shares being forfeited.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the performance units was $26.52, $27.95 and $45.80 for shares granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Compensation expense under the LTIP totaled $717,000 in 2009. No compensation expense was recorded in 2008 or 2007 based on projected performance measurement levels. The recognized tax benefit for stock compensation expense was $251,000 in 2009. Unrecognized stock compensation expense for the performance share awards was $122,000 with a weighted-average remaining amortization period of .4 years at December 31, 2009.

16. Other Non-Interest Expenses

Detail of other expenses included in the Statements of Income is as follows:

     
  Year Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Communication costs   $ 1,556     $ 1,653     $ 941  
Debit and ATM related costs     1,152       1,088       660  
Donations and marketing     1,133       1,452       1,036  
Employee related costs     1,105       830       577  
Office and branch supplies     710       732       537  
Other expenses     2,694       2,263       1,770  
Total   $ 8,350     $ 8,018     $ 5,521  

Communication costs include telephone and related costs, internet charges, and postage. Employee related cost includes hiring, training, parking, meeting and business travel costs.

75


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

17. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Contingencies

Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business, which in the opinion of management, are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments involving, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in addition to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

A summary of the contractual and notional amounts of the Company’s financial instruments follows:

   
  Year Ended December 31,
     2009   2008
Lending-Related Instruments:
                 
Loan origination commitments and unadvanced lines of credit:
                 
Home equity   $ 153,245     $ 157,542  
Commercial and commercial real estate     120,515       130,264  
Residential     9,009       16,536  
Letters of credit     3,089       1,734  
Derivative Financial Instruments:
                 
Interest rate cap     20,000       20,000  
Forward interest rate swap     20,000        
Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans           3,000  

Lending-Related Instruments

The contractual amounts of the Company’s lending-related financial instruments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements since certain of these instruments may expire without being funded and others may not be fully drawn upon. These instruments are subject to the Company’s credit approval process, including an evaluation of the customer’s creditworthiness and related collateral requirements. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes. The Company controls the credit risk of these instruments through collateral, credit approvals and monitoring procedures.

The Company has a notional amount of $20.0 million in forward interest rate swap agreements on its junior subordinated debentures. As the interest on these debentures converts from fixed interest rate to variable rate on June 30, 2011, the Company swapped a portion of the variable cost for a fixed cost. On March 18, 2009, the Company purchased a 10-year forward interest rate swap with a notional amount of $10.0 million, with a fixed cost of 5.09% and a maturity date of June 20, 2021. On July 8, 2009, the Company purchased an 18-year forward interest rate swap with a notional amount of $10.0 million, a fixed cost of 5.84% and a maturity of June 30, 2029. The fair value of the swap agreements at December 31, 2009 was $1.1 million and, as this instrument qualifies as a highly effective cash flow hedge, the change in fair value was recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, and other liabilities.

Through the acquisition of Union Trust, the Company acquired an interest rate cap agreement with a cap rate of 5.50%, notional amount of $20.0 million, and an expiration date of March 15, 2010. The fair value of the cap agreement at December 31, 2009 was zero. The Company considers this instrument to be an economic hedge; thus, changes in fair value are recorded in the Statement of Income.

76


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

17. Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

On July 14, 2005, the Company purchased interest rate protection agreements (floors) with notional amounts of $50.0 million, a strike rate of 6.0% and a termination date of July 14, 2010. These floors were acquired to limit the Company’s exposure to falling rates on Prime Rate loans. Under these agreements, the Company paid up front premiums of $410,000, which the Company amortized based on the expense amortization schedule established at the inception of the hedge, with the corresponding adjustment to the income statement. At inception, the hedging relationship was expected to be 100% effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the term of the hedge; however, the Company did not explicitly state within the original documentation the “first-payments received” methodology for describing with sufficient specificity the forecasted transaction. Accordingly, during the third quarter of 2007, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting and recorded the derivative transactions as economic hedges with a reclassification of the derivative’s losses from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings. Due to changes in market interest rates at the end of the fourth quarter of 2007, the fair value of the floor agreements increased and the Company sold the contracts for $441,000. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded income of approximately $39,000 related to the fair value adjustments and the subsequent sale of the floor agreements.

Forward Commitments to Sell Residential Mortgage Loans

The Company enters into forward commitments to sell residential mortgages in order to reduce the market risk associated with originating loans for sale in the secondary market. There were no commitments outstanding to sell mortgages at December 31, 2009. Commitments totaled $3.0 million at December 31, 2008. Based upon the minimal change in market interest rates between the commitment date and year end, and the notional amount of the commitment, the Company determined the balance sheet impact resulting from the change in fair value of the commitment was not material.

As part of originating residential mortgage and commercial loans, the Company may enter into rate lock agreements with customers, and may issue commitment letters to customers, which are considered interest rate lock or forward commitments. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, based upon the pipeline of mortgage loans with rate lock commitments and of commercial loans with commitment letters, and the change in fair value of those commitments due to changes in market interest rates, the Company determined the balance sheet impact was not material.

18. Fair Value Disclosures

GAAP permits an entity to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and other items at fair value. The Company has not made any fair value elections as of December 31, 2009.

Pursuant to GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists in GAAP for fair value measurements based upon the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.

Level 1:  Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2:  Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3:  Valuation is derived from model-based and other techniques in which at least one significant input is unobservable and which may be based on the Company’s own estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability.

When available, the Company attempts to use quoted market prices in active markets to determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1 or Level 2. If quoted market prices in active markets are not

77


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

18. Fair Value Disclosures  – (continued)

available, fair value is often determined using model-based techniques incorporating various assumptions including interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit losses. Assets and liabilities valued using model-based techniques are classified as either Level 2 or Level 3, depending on the lowest level classification of an input that is considered significant to the overall valuation. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at estimated fair value.

The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis.

       
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value
Measurements at
December 31,
2009
Assets:
                                   
Securities available for sale:
                                   
Obligations of states and political subdivisions   $     $ 18,060     $     $ 18,060  
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by US government sponsored enterprises           428,356             428,356  
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations           28,872             28,872  
Equity securities           4,420             4,420  
Trading account assets     1,725                   1,725  
Derivatives instruments           1,136             1,136  

       
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value
Measurements at
December 31,
2008
Assets:
                                   
Securities available for sale:
                                   
Obligations of US government sponsored enterprises
  $     $ 4,603     $     $ 4,603  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions           25,347             25,347  
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by US government sponsored enterprises           525,336             525,336  
Private issue collateralized mortgage obligations           46,777             46,777  
Equity securities           3,968             3,968  
Trading account assets     1,304                   1,304  
Derivatives instruments(1)                        

(1) The fair value at December 31, 2008 was less than $1,000.

78


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

18. Fair Value Disclosures  – (continued)

The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

       
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value
Measurements at
December 31,
2009
Assets:
                                   
Impaired loans   $     $ 16,135     $     $ 16,135  
Other real estate owned                 5,479       5,479  
Mortgage servicing rights           965             965  

       
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value
Measurements at
December 31,
2008
Assets:
                                   
Impaired loans   $     $ 11,158     $     $ 11,158  
Other real estate owned                 4,024       4,024  
Mortgage servicing rights           174             174  

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of other real estate owned measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:

 
  2009
Balance at beginning of year   $ 4,024  
Additions     3,420  
Valuation adjustments in the period     (1,006 ) 
Properties sold     (959 ) 
Balance at end of year   $ 5,479  

OREO properties acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure are recorded at the fair value of the real estate, less costs to sell. Any write-down of the recorded investment in the related loan is charged to the allowance for loan losses upon transfer to OREO. Upon acquisition of a property, a current appraisal or a broker’s opinion is used to substantiate fair value for the property. After foreclosure, management periodically obtains updated valuations of the OREO assets and, if additional impairments are deemed necessary, the subsequent write-downs for declines in value are recorded through a valuation allowance and a provision for losses charged to other non-interest expense.

79


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

18. Fair Value Disclosures  – (continued)

The carrying amounts and estimated fair value for financial instrument assets and liabilities are presented in the following table:

       
  December 31, 2009   December 31, 2008
     Carrying
Amount
  Fair Value   Carrying
Amount
  Fair Value
Financial assets:
                                   
Cash and due from banks   $ 29,772     $ 29,772     $ 35,195     $ 35,195  
Securities available for sale     479,708       479,708       606,031       606,031  
Securities held to maturity     37,914       39,639       42,040       41,954  
Trading account assets     1,725       1,725       1,304       1,304  
Derivatives instruments     1,136       1,136              
Federal Home Loan and Federal Reserve Bank stock     21,965       21,965       21,969       21,969  
Loans receivable, net of allowance     1,506,512       1,526,148       1,483,217       1,472,454  
Mortgage servicing rights     810       965       139       174  
Interest receivable     7,236       7,236       8,325       8,325  
Financial liabilities:
                                   
Deposits     1,495,807       1,502,020       1,489,517       1,486,620  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances     209,710       216,373       258,925       261,243  
Commercial repurchase agreements     126,466       135,189       126,577       131,197  
Other borrowed funds     146,450       146,450       232,893       232,893  
Junior subordinated debentures     43,512       51,075       43,410       48,376  
Interest payable     2,593       2,593       3,621       3,621  

The following assumptions, methods and calculations were used in determining the estimated fair value of financial instruments.

Cash and Due from Banks:  The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks approximate their fair value.

Securities Available for Sale and Trading Account Assets:  The fair value of securities available for sale and trading account assets is reported utilizing prices provided by an independent pricing service based on recent trading activity and other observable information including, but not limited to, dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, market interest rate curves, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the bond’s terms and conditions. The fair value of equity securities was calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis using observable information including, but not limited to, cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates and market spreads.

Securities Held to Maturity:  Fair values of securities held to maturity are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Federal Home Loan and Federal Reserve Bank Stock:  The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans:  For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of other loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Loan impairment is deemed to exist when full repayment of principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan is no longer probable. Impaired loans are reported

80


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

18. Fair Value Disclosures  – (continued)

based on one of three measures: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; the loan’s observable market price; or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the fair value measure is less than an impaired loan’s recorded investment, an impairment loss is recognized as part of the ALL. Accordingly, certain impaired loans may be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Management has estimated the fair values of these assets using Level 2 inputs, such as the fair value of collateral based on independent third-party appraisals for collateral-dependent loans.

Derivatives:  Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs obtained from third parties to value interest rate caps and swaps.

Mortgage Servicing Rights:  Mortgage servicing rights are evaluated regularly for impairment based upon the fair value of the servicing rights as compared to their amortized cost. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The Company obtains a third-party valuation based upon loan level data including note rate, type and term of the underlying loans. The model utilizes a variety of observable inputs for its assumptions, the most significant of which are loan prepayment assumptions and the discount rate used to discount future cash flows. Other assumptions include delinquency rates, servicing cost inflation, and annual unit loan cost.

Interest Receivable and Payable:  The carrying amounts approximate their fair value.

Deposits:  The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity is equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates and remaining maturities for currently offered certificates of deposit.

Borrowings:  The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings from the FHLB, securities sold under repurchase agreements, the notes payable and other short-term borrowings approximate fair value. The fair value of long-term borrowings and commercial repurchase agreements is based on the discounted cash flows using current rates for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Junior Subordinated Debentures:  The fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current rates for debentures of similar maturity.

19. Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Company and its bank subsidiary are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. These capital requirements represent quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by its regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). In addition, the OCC requires a minimum level of $2.5 million of Tier 1 capital to be maintained at Acadia Trust, N.A. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company and its subsidiaries meet all capital requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2009, the Bank was categorized by its supervisory regulatory agencies as well capitalized. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1

81


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

19. Regulatory Capital Requirements  – (continued)

risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events that management believes have changed the Bank’s respective capital categories.

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:

           
  Actual   For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
     Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
As of December 31, 2009
                                                     
Total risk-based capital   $ 179,941       12.42 %    $ 115,944       8.00 %    $ 144,930       10.00 % 
Tier 1 capital     161,798       11.16       57,972       4.00       86,958       6.00  
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio     161,798       7.37       87,789       4.00       109,737       5.00  
As of December 31, 2008
                                                     
Total risk-based capital   $ 166,699       11.53 %    $ 115,707       8.00 %    $ 144,634       10.00 % 
Tier 1 capital     149,008       10.30       57,854       4.00       86,780       6.00  
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio     149,008       6.61       90,236       4.00       112,795       5.00  
           

The Company’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:

           
  Actual   For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
     Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
As of December 31, 2009
                                                     
Total risk-based capital   $ 198,320       13.49 %    $ 117,613       8.00 %    $ 147,017       10.00 % 
Tier 1 capital     179,920       12.24       58,807       4.00       88,210       6.00  
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio     179,920       8.17       88,132       4.00       110,165       5.00  
As of December 31, 2008
                                                     
Total risk-based capital   $ 180,515       12.32 %    $ 117,205       8.00 %    $ 146,506       10.00 % 
Tier 1 capital     162,824       11.11       58,602       4.00       87,904       6.00  
Tier 1 leverage capital ratio     162,824       7.19       90,528       4.00       113,160       5.00  

82


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

20. Parent Company Financial Statements

Following are the condensed Statements of Condition, Income and Cash Flows for the Company.

STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

   
  December 31,
     2009   2008
ASSETS
                 
Cash   $ 11,090     $ 4,466  
Trading assets     1,725       1,304  
Premises and equipment     5,309       5,131  
Investment in subsidiaries:  
Bank subsidiary     207,995       188,738  
Other subsidiary     12,307       11,433  
Amounts receivable from subsidiaries     1,016       3,943  
Investments in Camden Capital Trust A and Union  
Bankshares Capital Trust I     1,331       1,331  
Other assets     3,054       1,882  
Total assets   $ 243,827     $ 218,228  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                 
Amounts due to subsidiaries   $ 38     $ 20  
Junior subordinated debentures     43,512       43,410  
Accrued interest and other liabilities     9,716       8,398  
Shareholders’ equity     190,561       166,400  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 243,827     $ 218,228  

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

     
  Years Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Operating Income
                          
Dividend income from subsidiaries   $ 12,000     $ 12,850     $ 36,000  
Fees from subsidiaries     15,218       14,603       11,368  
Other (loss) income     256       (362 )      60  
Total operating income     27,474       27,091       47,428  
Operating Expenses
                          
Interest on borrowings     2,845       2,954       2,388  
Salaries and employee benefits     9,598       8,282       7,110  
Net occupancy     483       482       441  
Furniture, equipment and data processing     2,278       2,275       1,687  
Other operating expenses     3,286       3,390       2,156  
Acquisition related expenses                 201  
Total operating expenses     18,490       17,383       13,983  
Income before equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries and income taxes     8,984       9,708       33,445  
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries     12,792       4,590       (14,005 ) 
Income before income taxes     21,776       14,298       19,440  
Income tax benefit     997       1,037       843  
Net Income   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283  

83


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

20. Parent Company Financial Statements  – (continued)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

     
  Years Ended December 31,
     2009   2008   2007
Operating Activities
                          
Net income   $ 22,773     $ 15,335     $ 20,283  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                          
Equity in undistributed (earnings) loss of subsidiaries     (12,792 )      (4,590 )      14,005  
Depreciation and amortization     944       969       825  
Stock-based compensation expense     1,072       250       275  
Decrease (increase) in amount receivable from subsidiaries     2,945       (3,987 )      (155 ) 
Increase in other assets     (1,068 )      (1,163 )      (920 ) 
Increase in accrued expenses     1,318       1,340       502  
Net cash provided by operating activities     15,192       8,154       34,815  
Investing Activities
                          
Purchase of premises and equipment     (865 )      (636 )      (887 ) 
Purchase of Union Bankshares Company           (18,548 )       
Net cash used by investing activities     (865 )      (19,184 )      (887 ) 
Financing Activities
                          
Exercise of stock options     6       194       248  
(Decrease) increase in note payable           (10,000 )      10,000  
Common stock repurchase     (55 )      (3,517 )      (4,476 ) 
Cash dividends paid on common stock     (7,654 )      (7,317 )      (6,317 ) 
Net cash used by financing activities     (7,703 )      (20,640 )      (545 ) 
Net increase (decrease) in cash     6,624       (31,670 )      33,383  
Cash at beginning of year     4,466       36,136       2,753  
Cash at end of year   $ 11,090     $ 4,466     $ 36,136  

84


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Tables Expressed in Thousands, Except Number of Shares and per Share Data)

21. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following table presents a summary of the quarterly results of operations for 2009 and 2008:

               
  2009   2008
     First   Second   Third   Fourth   First   Second   Third   Fourth
Interest income   $ 29,542     $ 28,694     $ 27,980     $ 27,115     $ 32,916     $ 32,077     $ 31,483     $ 30,644  
Interest expense     11,041       10,350       9,755       9,174       15,746       14,232       13,969       12,951  
Net interest income     18,501       18,344       18,225       17,941       17,170       17,845       17,514       17,693  
Provision for credit losses     1,730       2,783       2,000       1,700       500       450       1,170       2,277  
Non-interest income     4,554       5,043       5,149       4,701       4,396       4,705       3,697       3,861  
Other-than-temporary impairment of Freddie Mac securities                                         (13,950 )      (1,000 ) 
Non-interest expense     12,291       13,416       12,152       13,170       12,261       11,913       11,659       10,983  
Income (loss) before income taxes     9,034       7,188       9,222       7,772       8,805       10,187       (5,568 )      7,294  
Income tax expense (benefit)     2,820       2,184       2,894       2,545       2,611       3,080       2,452       (2,760 ) 
Net income (loss)   $ 6,214     $ 5,004     $ 6,328     $ 5,227     $ 6,194     $ 7,107     $ (8,020 )    $ 10,054  
Per common share:
                                                                       
Basic   $ 0.81     $ 0.66     $ 0.83     $ 0.68     $ 0.81     $ 0.92     $ (1.05 )    $ 1.32  
Diluted   $ 0.81     $ 0.65     $ 0.83     $ 0.68     $ 0.80     $ 0.92     $ (1.05 )    $ 1.32  

85


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Shareholders and Board of Directors
Camden National Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Camden National Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. We have also audited Camden National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Camden National Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Camden National Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, Camden National Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in COSO.

/s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker

Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker
Bangor, Maine
March 12, 2010

86


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

During the past two fiscal years, the Company has not made changes in, and has not had disagreements with, its independent accountant on accounting and financial disclosures.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company’s management conducted an evaluation with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer & Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the last fiscal year. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company and its management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer & Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that they believe the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. We intend to continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, and we may from time to time make changes to the disclosure controls and procedures to enhance their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements and other financial information contained in this Form 10-K. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for identifying the framework used to evaluate its effectiveness. Management has designed processes, internal controls and a business culture that foster financial integrity and accurate reporting. The Company’s comprehensive system of internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s accounting policies and internal control over financial reporting, established and maintained by management, are under the general oversight of the Company’s Board of Directors, including the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee.

Management has made a comprehensive review, evaluation, and assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. The standard measures adopted by management in making its evaluation are the measures in Internal Control — Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“the COSO”). Based upon its review and evaluation, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective and that there were no material weaknesses. However, Management recognizes a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, has inherent limitations and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met and may not prevent or detect all error and fraud. Therefore, even a system determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, an independent registered public accounting firm, which has audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-K, has issued its written attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which precedes this report.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

87


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the material responsive to such item in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2010.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the material responsive to such item in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2010.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans are as follows:

     
  Number of
Securities to Be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights
(a)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(b)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
(Excluding Securities
in Column a)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders     192,980     $ 22.62       578,842  
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders                  
Total     192,980     $ 22.62       578,842  

Refer to Notes 1 and 15 within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further information related to the Company’s equity compensation plans.

Other information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the material responsive to such item in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2010.

Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the material responsive to such item in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2010.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the material responsive to such item in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2010.

88


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) 1. Index to Financial Statements:

The consolidated financial statements of the Company and report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm incorporated herein are included in Item 8. of this Report, as follows:

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required under the instructions contained in Regulation S-X or because the information required to be set forth therein is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits:

 
Exhibit
No.
  Definition
(3.i.1)   Articles of Incorporation of Camden National Corporation, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.i to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 10, 2001).
(3.i.2)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Camden National Corporation, as amended to date (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 9, 2003).
(3.i.3)   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Camden National Corporation, as amended to date (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 4, 2007).
(3.ii)    The Bylaws of Camden National Corporation, as amended to date (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 10, 2008).
(10.1)     The Bank’s 1993 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 3, 2006).
(10.2)     Amendment No. 1 to the 1993 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 3, 2006).
(10.3)     The Company’s 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 8, 2008).
(10.4)     The Company’s form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 10, 2005).
(10.5)     The Company’s form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 25, 2005).
(10.6)     Management Stock Purchase Plan, as amended April 29, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 1, 2008).
(10.7)     The Company’s Long-Term Performance Share Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 15, 2005).
(10.8)     The Company’s Defined Contribution Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 4, 2008).

89


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Exhibit
No.
  Definition
(10.9)     The Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 4, 2008).
(10.10)    Union Trust Company’s Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008).
(10.11)    Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2008).
(10.12)    Director Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2008).
(10.13)    The Company’s Audit Committee Complaint Procedures (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 10, 2006).
(10.14)*   The Company’s 2010 Executive Incentive Compensation Program.
(10.15)    Form of Change in Control Agreement for chief executive officer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 14, 2009).
(10.16)    Form of Change in Control Agreement for named executive officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 14, 2009).
(10.17)    Employment Agreement between Camden National Corporation and Robert W. Daigle, dated as of April 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 1, 2008).
(10.18)    Restricted Stock Agreement between Camden National Corporation and Robert W. Daigle, dated as of April 29, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 1, 2008).
(10.19)    The Company’s Financial Planning Fringe Benefit Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 25, 2005).
(11.1)     Statement re computation of per share earnings is provided in Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
(14)       The Company’s Code of Ethics (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 10, 2006).
(18.1)*    Letter re change in accounting principles. Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker’s preferability letter concurring with the change in the goodwill impairment evaluation date for Acadia Trust, N.A., a reporting unit of the Company.
(21)*      Subsidiaries of the Company.
(23)*      Consent of Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker relating to the Company’s financial statements.
(31.1)*    Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2)*    Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.1)*    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.2)*    Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Filed/furnished herewith

90


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
  CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
Date: March 12, 2010   /s/ Gregory A. Dufour
Gregory A. Dufour
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities, and on the dates indicated.

   
Name   Position   Date
/s/ Gregory A. Dufour
Gregory A. Dufour
  President, Director and Chief Executive Officer   March 12, 2010
/s/ Deborah A. Jordan
Deborah A. Jordan
  Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer   March 12, 2010
/s/ Rendle A. Jones
Rendle A. Jones
  Chairman and Director   March 9, 2010
/s/ Ann W. Bresnahan
Ann W. Bresnahan
  Director   March 12, 2010
/s/ Robert J. Campbell
Robert J. Campbell
  Director   March 11, 2010
/s/ David C. Flanagan
David C. Flanagan
  Director   March 8, 2010
/s/ Ward I. Graffam
Ward I. Graffam
  Director   March 9, 2010
/s/ John W. Holmes
John W. Holmes
  Director   March 11, 2010
/s/ James H. Page
James H. Page
  Director   March 11, 2010
/s/ Robin A. Sawyer
Robin A. Sawyer
  Director   March 10, 2010
/s/ Karen W. Stanley
Karen W. Stanley
  Director   March 8, 2010

91